The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-42P Evergreen WalkTOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING 55 ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM Application No:g2 ‘b‘2f)RECEIVED omcial Receipt Date:Z*&§z *6y Receipt No:Jl 11 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPTAPPLICANT:Evergreen Walk LLC PROJECT NAME:Evergreen Walk ADDRESS:151 Buckland Road OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS:Ex/erqreen wk 1m:EVerqreen walk Master miation,Inc. ADDRESs;llO9 Rose Lane,Virginia Beach,VA 23451 COMPLETE LOCATION OF pROpERTY:WaEt of Mlard Road,North of Snit-h St.,South of Dem'ng St. ASSESSOR’S MAP #27 PARCEL #15 ZONE Manta Rd.(hteway Develgent Zme NAME,ADDRESS,TEL &FAX #OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Alan F.Lamson,FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc.,19 Silver Lane,East HartforO,CT (B60 )568-4030,Fax (860 )568—5129 Estimated presentation time:l 'O hrs' THIS APPLICATION IS FOR:(Check all that apply): Signature Applicant Signature of Property OwnerWNW D Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certificate of Mailing) D Subdivision/Resubdivision D Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) D Subdivision D Minor E Major D Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required)D Minor D Major B Conditional Approval E Special Exception to Article 4-2.4 (c)(Public Hearing,Certificate of Mailing) D Site Plan of Development g General Plan of Development -State Hearing per Section 14—55 for B Earth Filling (Sec.15)and/or Earth Removal (Sec.14 -Public Hearing Required) E Regulation Amendment D Zoning D Subdivision —Attach proposed amendment (Public Hearing Required) D Temporary and Conditional Permit for (Public Hearing Required) D In Law apartment/Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing Required) D Major Home Occupation for (Public Healing Required) D Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the -opert x-all applications ten (10)days prior to being heard by the Co )V W Quite RECEIVED .nn “i H,2007 LAW OFFXCES OF Mr.Alan F.Lamson FLB Architect-me &Planning Inc. 19 Silver Lane East Hartford,Connech'cut 06118 Re:Evergreen Walk,LLC - Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission,et a1 Dear Mr.Lamson: In my capacity as Co-Executor of the Estate of Richard Ripps,a Member of Evergreen Walk, LLC,and pursuant to my Power of Attorney from John Finguerra,Managing Member of Evergreen Walk,LLC,please construe this letter as authorizau‘on for you to act as agent for Evergreen Walk,LLC in the filing of a General Plan of Development and all other matters relating thereto. Very truly yours,EVERGREEN WALK,LLC By John Finguerra,Its Managing Member /NUQ,.M 'N‘la ~u~~PW Laurence P.Rubinow,His Attorney-in-Fact ' ESTATE OF RICHARD RIPPS y fl.W -&:ecw£’\ Laurence P.Rubinow,Co-Executor LPR/jcs EW-Evergreen Walk\lamon.062807 SOUTH WNDSOR PLANNING DEF}.WOODHOUSE,RUBINOW 8c MACHT,P.C. 555 MAIN STHEET MANCHESTER,CONNECTICUT 06040-5191 LAURENCE P.RUEXNOW (850)643A6100 TELECOPIER 1rubinow®wrmpc.com (360)647-0692 J1me 28,2007 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF EVERGREEN WALK (updated 4/12/2007) Address Owner Evergreen Walk Planned Unit Development: Unit #1 (The Shops at Evergreen Walk,Phase Ill) 35 Tamarack Ave.Buckland Road Retail LLC Mailing Address Lij different) 27/15 Unit #2 (The Shape at Evergreen Walk) 0000 Evergreen Way Unit #3 151 Buckland Road Unit #4 151 Buckland Road Unit#5 151 Buckland Road Unit#6 151 Buckland Road Unit#7 151 Buckland Road Unit #8 151 Buckland Road Unit #9 151 Buckland Road Unit #10 (L.A.Fitness) 100 Cedar Ave. Unit 1 1 151 Buckland Road Unit #11A 151 Buckland Road Unit #12 151 Buckland Road Unit #12A 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk Lifestyle Centers Evergreen Walk LLC 6410 Popular Ave.STE 850,, Memphis TN 381 19 6410 Popular Ave.STE 850, Memphis TN 381 19 Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 27/15 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 27/15 27/15 27/15 27/15 27/15 27/15 27/15 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 27/15 27/15 Commercial Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. Vacant Com. 1 F:\_FLB PROJ ECTS\FINGUER\99508.00\FLB_ZONE\GenPlanDev.070‘/1 0\Abutting0wners.doc Land Use Vacant Com. Map/Lot Address Owner Mailing Address (ji different)Map/Lot Land Use Unit #13 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/1 5 Vacant Com.Unit #14 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/1 5 Vacant Com.Unit #15 (ECHN Medical Offices) 2800 Tamarack Drive Evergreen Walk Medical 200 Fisher Drive 27/15 CommercialAssociatesLLCAvon,CT 06001 c/o The CASLE Corporation Other Parcels: 105 Buckland Hills Dr.Centro Bradley c/o Centro Watt 2 F:\_FLB PROJECTS\Fl NGUEH\99508.00\FLB_ZONE\GenP|anDev_O7071 O\AbuttingOwne4's.doc Northern Hills LLC 131 Dartmouth St.,Boston,MA 021 16 18/4 Commercial31BucklandHillsDr.Lowes Home Centers,inc.P.O.Box 1 1 11,No.Wilkesboro,NC 28656 18/6 Vacant95BucklandHillsDr.Centro Bradley c/o Centro Watt Northern Hills LLC 131 Dartmouth St.,Boston,MA 021 16 18/7 Commercial 1 Buckland Rd.Leonard,Scott 110 Lavender St,South Windsor,CT 06074 1 8/8 Single Family 9 Buckland Rd.Leonard,Scott 18/9 Single Family 15 Buckland Rd.Leonard,Scott 110 Lavender Lane,Rocky Hill,CT 06067 18/10 Single Family 70/90 Buckland Rd.MS Townline Associates LLC c/o Laurence Rubinow 555 Main St,Manchester CT 06040 18/3 Commercial 79 Buckland Rd.Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 27/12 Vacant 95 Buckland Rd.Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 27/13 Vacant 103 Buckland Rd.Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 27/14 Vacant 116 Buckland Rd.Buckland Road Assoc.LLC 395 Buckland Rd,South Windsor,CT 06074 27/10 4F/SF 130 Buckland Rd.Krawski,William 27/9 Single Family 179 Buckland Rd.Part of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St,Manchester CT 06040 27/1 Vacant) 190 Buckland Rd.Reichle,Earl &Barbara 247 Abby Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 27/8 Vacant 206 Buckland Rd.Rounseville,Marion &Roy 27/3 Single Family 207 Buckland Rd.Luu Dinh Hoang,Nguygen Trang Thonh 27/2 Single Family 218 Buckland Rd.Kochanski,Craig &Lynn.27/4 Single Family 235 Buckland Rd.Pan of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 38/11 Single Family) Address Owner Mailing Address 1E different)Map/Lot Land Use 240 Buckland Rd.Croteau,Arlene C.27/5 Single Family251BucklandRd.Part of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 38/12 Single Family)252 Buckland Rd.Wolf &Guerra,LLC 989 Ellington Rd.,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/10 Single FamilyR014/274 Buckl.Rd.Wolf &Guerra,LLC 989 Ellington Rd.,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/9 Vacant 296 Buckland Rd.Messiah Evan.Lutheran Ch.38/8 Single Family300BucklandRd.Messiah Evan.Lutheran Ch.38/7 Commercial326BucklandRd.Schiavone,Steven&Luca,Kawa 44 Highwood.,Simsbury,CT 06070 38/6 Single Family325/335 Buckland Rd.Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 38/13 Vacant350BucklandRd.Asticon Investment Ltd.1744 Ellington Rd,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/5 Vacant395BucklandRd.Woodcok,John J.Ill P.O.Box 684,South Windsor,CT 06074 38/1 Commercial419BucklandRd.Carmon &Co.807 Bloomfield Ave.,Windsor,CT 06095 51/34 Commercial432BucklandRd.Benchmark GPT Windsor,LLC 51/33 Commercial 40 Williams St.,Ste.350,Wellesley,MA 02482435BucklandRd.South Windsor ‘Reality CO LLC 51/35 Commercial c/o Peretz Resnick &CO LLP 303 South Broadway Tarrytown NY 10591 5422 3 F:\_FLB PROJECTS\FINGUER\99508.00\FLB_ZONE\GenPlanDev_070710\AbuttingOwners.doc 469 G Buckland Rd.Buckland Meadow Associates 51/49 CommercialR007SmithSt.Downeast Assoc.,Ltd.Prtnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206—6120 18/16 Vacant R002 Smith St.Downeast Assoc.,Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206-6120 17/16 175 Wheeler Rd.KF Properties,LLC 175 Wheeler Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/1 Res/Comm. 188 Wheeler Rd.Kebalo,Waiter 188 Wheeler Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/2 Single Family 140 Smith Street Jean Marc Jacques 658 Ellington Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 25/30 Vacant 198 Smith St.French,Margaret 17/3 Single Family 21 6 Smith St.Antosik,Scott &Beverly 17/4 Single Family 236 Smith St.Johnson,Aaron &Karen 17/5 Single Family 250 Smith St.Nation,Craig D.c/o JE Shepard CO, P.O.Box 41 5,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/6 Single Family 260 Smith St.Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 17/7 Single Family 274 Smith St.Rozwadowski,Robert &Ewa 17/8 Single Family 291 Smith St.Kilburn,Wayne &Norene 17/1 5 Single Family 302 Smith St.White,Lorraine 17/9 Single Family 307 Smith St.Pulford,Beth &Robert 17/1 3 Single Family 314 Smith St.314 Smith St.Assoc.332 Smith St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/1 0 Single Family 319 Smith St.Gill,Theodore &Betty 17/14 Single Family 4 F:\_FLB PROJ ECTS\Fl NG U EH\99508.00\FLB__ZON E\GenPlanDev_O7071 O\AbuttingOwners.doc Address Owner Mailing Address 1E different)Map/Lot Land Use 331 Smith St.Colavecchio,Vincent &Diane 17/12 Single Family332SmithSt.Hayes,Robert &Beverly 17/11 Single Family340SmithSt.Fraser,Brenda &.&Bruce D.18/1 Single Family345SmithSt.Beaupre,Gene 18/1 7 Single Family357SmithSt.Boutin,Emil &Lucille 18/15 Single Family367SmithSt.Downeast Assoc.Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206-6120.18/14 Single Family377SmithSt.DuFour,Willard &Claire 18/1 3 Single Family383SmithSt.Gancarz,Richard &lrene 18/12 Single Family395SmithSt.Leonard,Scott 110 Lavender Lane,Rocky Hill,CT 06067 18/1 1 Vacant22WheelerSt.Downeast Assoc.Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206-6120 17/17 Vacant5DrakeCt.Hill,Michael 25/30-31 Residential6DrakeCt.Stryker,Greg 25/30-20 Residential7DrakeCt.Chaudhry,Zanib B.25/30-30 Residential8DrakeCt.Muddassir,Syed M.25/30-21 Residential9DrakeCt.Sobieski,Peter 25/30-29 Residential10DrakeCt.Reid,Lennox &Shannon 25/30-22 Residential11DrakeCt.Edgecomb,David &Laura 25/30-28 Residential12DrakeCt.Case,Wendy O.&Ryan 25/30—23 Residential14DrakeCt.Machowski,James &Adrienne 25/30—24 Residential15DrakeCt.Roncaioli David J 25/30-27 Residential 16 Drake Ct.Kleczkowski,James &Shannon 25/30—25 Residential 17 Drake Ct.Luczha,Joseph;25/30—26 Residential R003 Deming St.Jamil,Muhammad &Humera 17 Deming St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 50/23 Vacant 17 Deming St.Jamil,Muhammad &Humera 50/19 Single Family 25 Deming St.Cotton,Esther 50/20 Single Family 33 Deming St.Soucy,Lionel &Margaret 50/21 Single Family 43 Deming St.Soucy,Lionel &Margaret 50/22 Single Family 47 Deming St.Kebalo,Andrian &Cheryl 51/44 Single Family 50 Deming St.Molloy,Elizabeth 51/47 Single Family 6O Deming St.DFV Associates LLC 51/46 Single Family 67 Deming St.Gaines,Michelle &Jason 51/43 Single Family 68 Deming St.Freeman,Daniel 51/45 Single Family 75 Deming St.Wisneski,David &Nathalie 51/42 Single Family 76 Deming St.Jones,Robert &Townsend,Phyliss 51/40 Single Family 83 Deming St.Desrocher,James 51/41 Single Family Address Owner Mailing Address (E different)Map/Lot Land Use 112 A Deming St.Hershcopf,Steven 112 Deming St,Unit A 51/38—1 Commercial112BDemingSt.Gerlt,Wayne PO Box 1 132 South Windsor CT 06074 51/38-2 Commerciai112CDemingSt.Gerlt,Wayne PO Box 1132 South Windsor CT 06074 51/38—3130DemingSt.Grilli,Gary &Jean 435 Buckland Road,S.Windsor,CT 06074 51/37 Commercial152DemingSt.South Windsor Reality CO LLC c/o Peretz Resnick &CO LLP 303 South Broadway Tarrytown NY 10591 542251/36 Commercial F:\_FLB PROJ ECTS\Fl NGUER\99508.00\FLB_ZONE\GenPIanDev_07071 0\AbuttingOwners.doc 240 Deming St.Cavalry Church of the Assemblies 400 Buckland Road 38/2 Commercial R01 7 Clark St.Waldron,Stanley 859 Clark St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 37/7 VacantR016ClarkSt.Gray,Freddie 119 Columbia Rd,Windsor,CT 06095 37/3 VacantR014ClarkSt.Waldron,Stanley 859 Clark St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 37/6 Vacant490ClarkSt.Szymczyk,Leon &Sophie 37/9 Single Family500ClarkSt.Hood,Donald 37/10 Single Family 61 0 Clark St.Dinse,Merle &Audrey 37/8 Single Family748ClarkSt.Kaufman,Cynthia &Clark,Patrick 50/28 Single Family 760 Clark St.Karzar,John &Patricia 50/27 Single Family RECEIVED JUL 1 0 2007 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc.19 Silver Lane East Hartlord GT 06118 (860)568-4030 fax:(860)568-5129 e-mail:flh@flharch.com web:www.1lbarch.com TO:Town of South Windsor -Planning and Zoning CommissionAttn.Marcia Banach,Director of Planning /1 M£FROM:Frank Hubeny,AICP 4/. DATE:7/09/2007 / RE:Evergreen Walk — General Plan of Development and Special Exception requestProjectNo.99508.00 This memorandum accompanies an application for a General Plan of Development (GPD)for Evergreen Walk and as part of the GPD the request for a Special ExceptionaccordingtoSection4.2.4 (c)for residential use as part of the new GPD.The combinedlanduseoftheexistingandproposeddevelopmentfortheEvergreenWalkproperty shows725,000 SF retail building area,550,000 SF of office use,75,000 SF of indoor recreationarea,250 hotel rooms,and 200 residential dwelling units.This program is based on a full‘build-out’proposal of the property (see sheet Z-3). The applicant feels that the residential units as shown on the Master Plan is closely knittedintotheretail/commercial concept and will be a key element in the future development ofEvergreenWalk.The presence of the future residents will enhance not only the proposeduses,but will also support the existing retail,grocery,fitness,and medical office facilities intheirongoingsuccess. The application considered the following criteria for the Special Exception request' (1)The trip generation of all the proposed uses,including the 200 residential dwellingunitswasstudiedbyF.A.Hesketh &Associates.The findings of the study and the roadimprovementrecommendationshavebeensubmittedtotheStateTramcCommission forreviewandapproval.A copy of this report has been submitted to this Commission as partofthisapplication.The applicant does not see a detrimental tramc impact on thesurroundingareabasedontheTrafficReport. (2)&(3)The proposed residential units are envisioned to be of a very high quality,exceeding rental property standards found to date east of the river in the greater Hartfordregion.The applicant is confident that the presence of residential units will change thecharacterofEvergreenWalktoa24—hour community,which will have a very positive impactontheexistingresidentialpropertiesalongBucklandRoadandSmithStreet.This will alsosupportexistingandproposedcommercialusesintheGatewayZoneandbeyond.This 24- hour community will blend well with the surrounding mix of residential and commercial propenies and will therefore conserve and raise property values in the surrounding areas. (4)The existing capacity of the utilities and drainage system can handle theadditionalloadcreatedbytheresidentialuse.Fuss &O’Neill has studied the impact on allutilitiesandthereporthasbeensubmittedforyourreviewaspartoftheGPDapplication package.As shown in the Master Plan it is proposed to improve and add to the existingsidewalksystemonEvergreenWalkwhichwillprovideanattractiveandsafepedestrianenvironment. (5)All residential units are proposed to be located in one,two,or three stories abovecommercialspace.Both the ‘town square’and ‘main street’concept provide for a pedestrian oriented environment which invites people to spend time along the side walks,outdoor dining areas,and other open spaces which can be utilized for a broad variety ofuses.The units will be oriented towards these open spaces and designed in way tooverlooktheactivityofthestreetsandthesquare.Entrance situations will not be hidden orseparated,but rather integrated into the overall facade design of the buildings to allow forinteractionbetweenvisitorsandresidentsofthecommunityandalloweasyaccessfortheresidentstotheserviceslocatedonthestreetlevel. (6)The proposed residential units will be designed in terms of access and interiorlayouttomeetallConnecticutStateBuildingCodestandardsandtomeetalllegalrequirementsforthedisabled. (7)The overall design of the buildings will use design elements and material choicesthatreflectthelocalcharacterofSouthWindsor.The architecture will strike a balancebetweenaformalframeworktotietheoveralldevelopmenttogetherandaninterestingvariationofstorefrontsanddetailswhichwillprovideforanintriguingatmosphereon asmallerscale.A conceptual elevation drawing is provided as part of the application package.Detailed material palettes and architectural elevations will be provided to thisCommissionattheFinalSitePlanapplication. (8)The closest adjacent residential use is located along the north side of SmithStreet.The proposed mixed use buildings with residential units in the upper stories arelocatedbetween140and400feetnorthofthesouthempropertyline,abutting Smith Street.Per the Buckland Road Gateway Development regulations a 75-feet landscaped bufferalongthepropertylineabuttingaresidentialzoneisrequiredasshownontheMaster Plan.In addition to this buffer a conservations easement is in place located between the KabaloresidentialdevelopmentandtheEvergreenWalkproperty.The southem boundary of thissectionofEvergreenWalkiscurrentlyheavilyvegetatedanditisproposedtomaintainandenhancetheexistingvegetationinthebufferzoneandinmostsectionsbeyondasshownontheplan. (9)We believe that the application conforms to the best of our knowledge to therequirementsoftheSouthWindsorZoningRegulations. (9)The South Windsor Plan of Conservation and Development does not specificallyrefertoresidentialdevelopmentontheEvergreenWalksite.However,it does refer to theBucklandRoadGatewayDevelopmentZoneasan‘Economic Development Area’.Morespecificallyitstates“Mixed uses,designed to replicate a more traditional way of life,may beappropriateinsomeareassuchastheBucklandRoadGatewayDevelopmentZone”(page14).We feel the traditional New England downtown pattern of commercial uses on the ground floor and a mix of office and residential on the upper floors would certainly fall intothecategoryofareplicaof”a more traditional way of life”. (10)The property is physically suitable for multistory development and the gentle slope of three to five percent from east to west provides for an ideal setting for the proposed development,while maintaining the existing natural boundaries surrounding the site. (1 1)The historic use of the property is farming as in many other parts of the Town of South Windsor.The proposed development does not interfere with the protection of significant historic factors. (12)The integrated character of a variety of uses will provide a significant amount of daily services to its residents.In addition the close proximity to the existing retail establishments,restaurants,grocery store,fitness facility,and medical office buildings within a pedestrian friendly layout will serve the future residents well. lf you should have any questions regarding the General Plan of Development or Special Exception application in front of you please do not hesitate to contact our omce. file F:\FLB PROJECTS\FINGUER\995D8.00\FLB_ZONE\Genplandev_07071 0\PZC_Narrative_070709.Doc Hesketh EH 6 Creamery Brook -East Granby,CT 06026 F.A.Hesketh&Associates,Inc. July 9,2007 RECEWED Alan F.Lamson,AIA FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc.§,5:19 Silver Lane East Hartford CT 061 18 SOUTHWINDSORPLANNINGDEPI. univ,, RE:Proposed General Plan of Development Traffic Impact -Evergreen Walk Town of South Windsor Our File:00167 Dear Mr.Lamson: We have prepared the attached report to document the potential traffic impact associated with the proposed General Plan of Development for the Evergreen Walk Property on Buckland Road in South Windsor,Connecticut. The report has also been submitted to the State Traffic Commission as part of an application to amend the current Certificate for the development.lt is currently under review by the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The report recommends some intersection improvements at Tamarack Drive,the southerly site entrance.With these improvements in place,the additional traffic generated by this proposal will not have any adverse impact on the surrounding roadway system. lt is our understanding that this report will accompany an application for this plan to the Town Planning &Zoning Commission.lf you require any additional information,pleaseletusknow. Verytruly yours, an ger of Transportation Engineering cc:John Finguerra John Mallin Laurie Rubinow Jay Giles Michelle Carlson T:\00167\reg change\2nd\alam4247.doc Civil &Traffic Engineers -Surveyors -Planners -Landscape Architects Tel 860.653.8000 -Fax 860.844.8600 'email mail@fahesketh.com .i REGENED Jr!(‘) WUTH MNDSOR PLANMNG DEPT‘ MM Eve Trarfflrceen g 'Report Walk Part 2 Adden ExpanSIon dum I RECEIVED SEP 0 7ZUU/ SOUTH WENGINEER,INDSOR NG DEP‘lj u Saturday Background Traffic Lanes,Volumes.Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 24:I-84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan )—»wr*k‘xTr\l</ Lane Configura ‘i 4 F !dea'lFlpW](vphpl)’900@900g&1 900%1900 Total Lost Time (s) Leading Detector:(ft Trailing Detector (ft) Turning Speed (mpLaneUtllFactor 3,0 3.0:50aggggz;5o Flt Permitted Satd Flow ‘ Travel Time Volume (vph Ad]Flow (vph)Lane Group Flow (vp'l‘i)@‘7TurnTypecustom Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detéeto'r Phase'eW’a $4 Minimum initial (s 4.0 Minimum Split Total Split (s)62.0 :To l Split (% mum Green s Yellow Time ( Lead Lag Optimiz. Vehicle Extensmn ,(s)§Recall Mode 40.0 Total Dela y Aroach Delapp y 90th %ile Green (s 580 36.0 36.0 1 54.0 t ' l A ’Jgiicoomt Coordi-Max Coor1"0‘5'‘70th %iie Green (s)58.0 58.0 80 36.0 36.14.0 4.0 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 1 tlo ;%§190 3 3 h )‘ (pg‘Th ( ) 3 m; I V ) ) (5'Wgi,‘0,0 M i () s All Red Time ( Lead/Lag¥.é§ e §3.0 20.0 20 0‘33%‘8‘O"'‘ . Q LOS%W Approach LOS W,‘ )4 0 90h %ile Term Cod'e g Max 0 5 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 24:l-84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Reducedv/c Ratuo 0.89 0.89 0.44 o.95 0.15 0.85 0.80 Intersecn Caac Uzan 8 %tio pny trhtlo 3 8 -Volume exceeds caa.ueue theoreall 3E Queue shownl 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\001 67\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 2 StoragekLCap Reductn %V‘'wank lntersectron Slgnal Delay Anaiysrs Period (mm)153$ pCIty q Is ticy Infinite x 01 P m2 é 121418’?'4 r 3&3’ Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 21:I-84 HOV Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations Iiiéai‘Fiow (vphpl) fetal Lost Time (s) Leading Detector (ftTrailingDetector(ft Turning Speed (Lane Utii,Factor Fit Permitted WSatdFlow(permyW Right Turn on Red fggmswo 58%0 41 4‘3 4.6 2.4 .2¥%éé’zo. 4.8 2.6TotalDelaLowApproachDelay Approaoh LOS 90th %ile Green (s) 90th %ile Term Cod 70th %ile Green (s) 5/16/2007 Ft A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackAsyY Page 1 94.0 94,0 94.0 rd Cdord coordl .0”3 94.0 94.0 2 ) ) mp ‘8 ‘r _;ro2 ye* e 3‘0 §§f§a4 Ad]Flow (vph)Lane Group Flow (vph)Turn Type Minimum Initial (s)Minimum Split (s)“w. 18 3A)18 A:8127%:81.1%811% A Red Time(s) Lead/Lag”%“b Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s)h 0 81 0.81 0.81 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 21:I-84 HOV Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan etil Is SigrimVolumefor95thprcenequeuemeteredbyupstream ai 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 2 gas! Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 17:Pavillions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations Ideal Fiow (vphpiTdtaiLostTime (s)Leading Det’ector'(ft):§ Trailing Delecfor (ft)Turning Speed (mp h)& Factor Flt Permitted S‘atdxFlow (perm)ga Right Turn on Redm Satd Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor 1 00 Link Speed (m Travel Time vdiume (vh) Adi Flow(vph) Lane Group Flo‘W-(v Turn Type Protected Phas Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio gag Control Dela 90m %ile Green (s) 90th %ile Term Cod 70th %ile Green (s) 5/1 6/2007 Ft At Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 1 2210 84.028.0 28.0 58.0 ) i g W ph) ( p p‘M e Yellow Time ( All Red Time (s ) y e Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 17:Pavillions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Base Caacrtvh 830 561 2717 1583 339 2558 m Volume for 95th percenme queue Is metered by upstream srgnal 5/16/2007 F.A1 Hesketh &Associates,lnc‘Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA,sy7 Page 2 py(p)S m2 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpi Total Lost Time (s)Lééding Déiecfor (ft Tralllng Detector (ft e V SatdfFloWKprot) Flt Permitted Fit Pro c d’ 0.950 k tance (ft) Volue vh 2‘97‘g;i833 193 ane Group,FIOW (vTurnType Protected Phasestz Permitted Phases Total Sp s) ota i Lead Lag Optimize ehie Extensn s ? Vcl io () Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated /C Ra None one 7 4 Total Dela lg: Aproach Delay 90th e Green (s) 90th %ile Term Code 70th %ile Green (s) 5/16/2007 Ft AA Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 3 Max @Maxw46o '4 o 9 913132 ), ))’%§' a" Lin Dis ime(s)’rn (p)wiosz o L p i 0.0 2 0 O 0%167% lit ( Tl S lt (% g tio % QueueDelay'7w y p Approach LOS %il N‘6 270$247’ o 2 0 2 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 70th ”/oilé T rmVC 50th %ile Green (s)50th %xle Term Cod 30th %Ile Green (s) 30th %lle Term Co 10th %Ile Green (s)5 1 13.1 Ie Term CodemGl a _ Stops (vph 9 1 22 6ap$Hold§$Ww$é Ga a : CO EmISSIons (g/hr) NOx Emissions (g/hr VOC EmISSIons (g/hr Dilemma Veh1cles (# Queue Length 50th Turn Base Bay CapaCIty Length (vph) (f 452 1032 1583 541 1091 1583 1108 1119 583 89 868 153 Starvation Cap Redu Splllback Cap Reduc Storage Cap Redu Reduced v/c Ratio 102 135 o WW“"'‘.§¥ycle Length 120 Actuated Cycle Le gth 101 6 Control Tpe Actuated Uncoordlnatedy ctlon Signal Del ctton Capacity A ySIs Period (mm)15 90th %Ile Actuated Cycle 1 70th %Ile Actuated Ccle 120 m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream Slgnal 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates.Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackAtsy7 Page 4 o e de ) jG p ) ) ) Queue Length 95t h ;V Internal Link Dist (ft)t wg ’r 1 1 0 c L’. t c e a e Ut 2 " y g 969d MS'VXGBS 1ES\Slun09 DSSMQJWBId AeJ LOOZ 3)mds {emf (S)1nds [2101),mds‘iu‘nwgww "L§§fg L sesaqd pamuuedses~9ud papexuded/(i umi Lid/x)MQH dnoJs a a] (udA)MOH fpv 332:]JnoH xead (qdA)ewnloA )ewLL 191ml (1;)eoue1s1c]>lurl §('dw)paads xun Jopej AEMpeaH 618)MOB fmes‘ pea uo uJnimEIa LuJad)Mala fp1'es palIIUJJQd 1H (10id Mela ‘mes P 13310Jd 1H Jomei [an auej )paads 6ulum_l_ )Jopema Bumeu 1;)Jopmsa 6u1pee1 s)eLuIL 3s01 lemi (IdudA)MOH Jeep! Uouem6uuoo 9ue1 fk @omg§§929 é‘gsase 86a om 929 999 001OO'L 00 L $§W 09 W 09 g?09 §09 OV OV OV OV 0v O'V OV O 0V _006V 0 6L 006L 00’v O'V ueld Jeysew z eseqd 'JG Helea ’8 9908 KQIIBA 1U9599Id i9 Head LVS 3!};EJJ.PunOJBXOEH OLOZ s5u!wu_‘seLumoA ‘seue‘l A ‘’S %0 OZ %0 ‘_av€i§é__%‘z‘9%o 9 ~»a %( 0 s 7§ @ :( ~;;) y w ( ‘ § OV W ” V 06 3 300 64hkE uodeg 9 OJuou/(s -:)Ul ‘selepossv ’8 HJQXSSH ‘V 'd LOOZ/QL/Q 08L 09L 919 L9 L89 6€Z 6'93 (S)ueeJs ell%umI;'xew $91014 @ ‘990C)UJJeJ.9Il%H106 (S uems 9II%u106 [mag leuol Kama enano t Aeleq puuoomww 01A 69 O Z9 O oueg 3/6 pe1en1av€§g we§9 8 (S)emu pea Ilv*:(s)awn;MouaA O EL O EL (s)ueeJs umuuxew Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 5:Pleasant Valley Road &Retail Dr.Phase 2 Master Plan Area Type Cycle Length 9 Actualed Ccle Lenth 90 Slits and Phases:5:Pleasant Valle Road &Retail Dr.p y 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackAlsy7 Page 6 0%'r y g L 962d MS’WOEE 193\Slun00 PQS!/\9J\Ueld ASJ LOOZ K€W\LQLOO\OOOZ\VJ_VGSOH\3H nodeg 9 OJLpu/(s '9Ul ‘Salepossv ’8 HISXSSH 'V 'd LOOZ/QL/S [LL [LL (S)uaeJs 9m um ouea 0/6 palemov )Heals m3 19v epow ueoea ‘s)umsueua epxqaA (,eZIuJudo 62-1 p231 >199cl LVS 0!J49JJ_pun015>10€8 OLOZ sSugwu ‘sewmoA ‘saue‘l ‘ W 0 69 0 VL L%Z ?L %Z wr ‘O’LL 'H (S)mds IeJOL‘O’LL ‘o'u KS)Juds wnwwlw (S)le!uUI liJhuJ!ii!waseudmagma aSEqd pewuuadseqdpewswJdad/(L UJn_Lveggéggovzi(QdX)iA‘cSH dnms‘sum 99 80L OVZ [Z (udA)M0l:i 'Ipv $5t6 o %§L6 0 JomeJ‘moH ){éeaWL(udA)VauinjbAk 5%?(s)emu [aAeJL W€Sk%&%W HOLE)MOH mespeauoumiNBIHwad)'MOH mes P91¥!U~Ued 1H (10m)M013 'mes' P9139}01cl "jwww£96 O 96 0 101023 um aue1 %%%gg@ (udw)peeds 6u1umi (;Jo1oa1aq BunIEJiq“(g)1010319a 6u1p291 0 V 0 V 0'7 (S)awu.Isow Iem 006i V ‘006 L 006:‘“(IdudA)MOH IeemH‘suoueJnBuuoo eue'} W r ueld Jezsew z asaqd 193113 puemong )g aAgJQ xoeJBuJei :9 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan 0th %lle_erm 50th %Ile Green s 30th %Iie Green s 30th %1le Term 10th %Ile Green (s) 10th %Iie Term Code Stops (vp 1274 512 2165gg‘ Area Type: cybie Length‘‘1 2 Actuated Cyc intersection CapaCIty 5/1 6/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 8 7 Co () ()C ’ w M’ h 0 l U I I Analysis Period (min Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan eaing Deecor frailing Detector (ftTurhing’Speed (mpL‘a‘he Utn.Factor Flt Protected Sétd,Flow (prFltPermitted Satd Flow (perm)Rlght Turn on Red g Satd Flow,(RTO l-leadway Factorw Link Speed (mphLkDustance(ft)I vel Time (s).... Volume (vph) Peak Hour Fac Ad]Flow(vph) Lane Group Flow (v Pe o RV ) .. tor ph):_ rotcted Phases Permitted Phases To a Splvt(s) Total Split (% Maximum Green s Yellow Time (s)Ail-Red Time (s ead/L Recall Mode Act Actuated Effct Green /C Ratio(s)g 0.0,16 0.84 O 84 O 7g gém 69 9 ;’T 7%04 2 2 5 5 Queue’Delay Total Dela pp y Approach LOS ll ( 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 9 Aroach Dela 9m %n Green (spé ) 90th %1le Tem Code % 70th ”/ae Green ) r m 900§3190 4 o Ld tt (ft), ) A h) _) ()’" )Lag 23‘‘W’W, :‘ja 'I y u Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 50th %Ile Green ( 50th %lIe Term 30th %Ile Green (s) 30th °/a1le Term Code 10th %Ile Green s ay Length ( lty (vh 0.45 0,3 Intersection Capacny Utlllzatron 52 2% Analysis Period (mln)jSj Splits and Phases: 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 1 0 s Co J? () B ft)‘ C p) 2”“r§i gf”?‘ Lanes,Volumes,Timings 201 O Background Traffic SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Fit Protected Satd Flow (prot) Flt Perm Itted R ght Turn on Red Satd Flow (RTOR) Headwa Factor 62egg 64 841 986 tt§iaegt8 ProteCted Phase Permitted Phases Detector Phas Minimum lnmai (s) Minimum Split Total Slit s Act Effct Green (s)‘ Actuated g/C Ra 007 O14 086 O86 O80 080 70th %ile Green (s).0 100‘8 92.8 928 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates.lnc.Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackAtsy7 Page 1 1 W ; W y mx s e (s) p () § :gjl 03 tio Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan i;L ’ m Volume for 95th percentlle queue Is metered by upstream srgna! Slits and Phases:8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Streetp 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 12 9L 952d MS‘VWEE 1?S\31U”03 DSS!/\9J\UEld A91 [.002 KBW\L9LOO\000Z\V.LVGSOH\3H uodaH 9 OJqou/(g 'OUI ‘SQIBDOSSV ’9 ulaXSBH 'V 'd LOOZ/9L/Q 8173 (S)ueaJs ell%uloe gWso‘l qoemddvAel9c1uoemddv O'V 8'VZ é)(Jams)16;;3 19v990wneoea s)uo‘sumxa apmeA 5e1 p291 521/9991 O‘L 0'L 0'L 0'L ()ewu.pea nv$o09gangi'O'e agg o 9a o 93 (s)uaaJs wnuuxew §§~9§(%)1Ilds i (S)1Ildss)mdg ujhwiuiw ad/(i uJni MWDH'dnoJa sue-1 (udA)MOH fpv g%§gsm§g%:02;,JnoH xaad 8 L t €L L (udA)auJmoA (u)Jo1oa1ea BuuIeJimmwmbaah6wpeé1” mu.:SO'I IEJOL s aue1 362.1013 ldudA)MOH leap:subjjéhiigwog eue1 09L 0 006L 006L ueld Jasew z aseqd mans pueppng )g wens 6u1uJea :6 Head J_VS OHJEJJ.PUHOJBXOES OLOZ s6uuugi ‘seumloA ‘seue‘l _.....g '' ,( ’( ”w »0i i’%( ”H ot9'“f;:0 00 L g’V mst $E“ W :( Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 9:Deming Street &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan W? 90th %lle Te Co 70th %lle Green (s) 70th %rle Term Co 50th %lIe Green (s Stops (vph)Fuel Used(ga VOC Emlssrons (g/ Dilemma Vehlcies Queue Length 50th (ft )h t uct Reducedv/cRatIo 0.11 016 0.29 052 049 0.16 0.35 0.30 0.34 Internal Link Dlst (ft T Bay Lengt gase CapaCIty (vph) Starvatlon Cap Reduc Splllback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Red m Volume for 95th percentlle queue Is metered by upstream Signal Stits and Phases:9:Demin Street &Buckland Streetpg 5/1 8/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 14 r 0 r d’ d ) l) h (# ) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 201 0 Background Traffic SAT Peak 10:Deming Street &Site Drive Phase 2 Master Plan cSH 1700 1700 1337 1700 590 809 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 3 Saturday Combined Traffic L 969d Mslwwa 193\S‘”“°°PQSMQJNBId A91 Looz KewugL00\ooozwi\10s3H\:H JJOdeg 9 OJuou/(s '°”'‘Selemssv ‘9 HISWSQH 'v ':I Looz/gL/Q so‘]uoemddv Kelaa’uaeoi‘ddv SO’IAmeamoi Aelaa ensno [63 6'Q9 ILZ Lv€99L €9L OVZ [9L O‘SZ (s)ueeJs pg;19v LV#)SIIEO ueu;saped >HEM 1UOG qsaH ,(s)9w31i>1reM QPOW H9398 (S)luds ueml)llldS lunulgui 9d/(_L uJni 89$?LE3 gk (ud’AYMoH dnmg aueq V63 ISZ (qdA)MOH fpv (qdA)ewnloA (s)awll [eAeJi(u)souBISJa Mum pawwed 1H 10w)MOId me u)J°1oe;ea Swpe-(al (S)awn 1s0‘l mm ueld Jasew z aseqd *8 peoa u016um3 :€€ mead ivs oweu pun016>ioea 0Loz s6u!w!i ‘saLumoA ‘seum r J ) S w 9 H w§ (s Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 33:Ellington Road &Phase 2 Master Plan 70th %lIe Green (s)V ’ 70fn ’%rlke>’Tenn Code Max Hold rle Green (s)$§$@§1 tops (vFuelUsedal (g) l CO Emrsrr Queue Length 95th (ft 12 104 ntemal Link Dist intersection Signal D lntersectlon Capacrty 90th %Ile Actuated Ccle 75y 10th %Ile Actuated Cycle 65 5/16/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates.Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 2 %5 0 S ph) slons(glh) %’ )4 I (ft) Base Capacny (v ph) Starvation Cap Reductn Splllback Cap Reu dctn w i é‘a”»H ......,... \’m‘l “f m2 Jaé§W§§l 303 a5“sawm Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Master Plan Total Lost Time s n t Flt Protected Satd Flow (pr Fit Permitted Minimum Initial s ) Yeliow Time (s )Ail Red Time (s) Lead Lag Optimi Vehicle Extensio Recall Mode WélkTime (s)§%%hash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#lActEffctGreen(s) A uated gIC Rati’ onro e Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Dela Approach LOS 5/1 6/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 1 6 110 110oww 108 1032 1032 917 ()Leadig Deector'(ft)‘ o V z n §¢’l A hr v§% ,7 ”“ go Ctl Dlay y: Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Background Traffic SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Master Plan 0th %iie Green (s50th%ile Term Code %lie,Green,(s)£§30th %ile Term Code 30th'%iiererééh’(s), 10th %ile'Term Code ueue Length 50th Queue Length 95th ft Spiitback Cap Reduc Storage Cap Reductn Offset 78 9 66%Referenced to hase 2 NBTL and 6 SBT Start of Yellow ControlTyp Actate o ated Intersecn nal Dela naly Ped (15 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\OO1 67\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat BackA.sy7 Page 17 5 )1% 30th1 §g “’ Q (ft) () t ()pNaturalCycte55 e ud Cor m ~MaXImum v/c Ratio 0 5 tio Sig y 7 2 tn ’rsection Capacity Utilize ion \’’ ASIs rio min) é‘T m2 86‘: Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 24:I—84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations ideal Flow (vphpl” Total Lost Time (s "i 4 i" 900i§§wg§1900oo 3 o 3 o 0m50§ Tuming Speed (mph Lane Utll Factor S'atd.~Flow,(pr Fit Permitted S m-g3“’“htd :Fiow (per lume (vph) Peak Hour Fa Adj Flow(vph)1638 83 Lane Group,\Flgyyf(v £1638 $8 Turn Type PrOtected Phases: Permitted Phases inimum Split Totai Spht MaXImum Green (s) low Time (s)§i Red Time (s V‘ehiclekEktens’io‘n (s Re¢aii Mode Ad Effct Green (s)§Actuated g/C Ratio Approach Dela Approach LOS 90th %ile Green s) goth %ile Term Co 70th %ile Green (s) 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA,sy7 Page 24 580 58.0 370 370 130 54.0 )_::§)5§ér ‘ L ot) o ‘cio p e _‘i ”3. " M (s) (s :I @) ) %§590 y d Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 24:i—84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Base CapaCIty(vph 826 828 784 1610 401 1622 Area Type Cycle Length 12 Actuated Cycie Le ~Volume exceeds caacny‘ueue istheoreticaii infinite@§ueue sho #95th percentile volume exceeds caaCIty,queue ma be lonerpyg 5/16/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 25 ) x3e :54;w 5; d 0 ‘ n p q VyQn m4 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 21:I-84 HOV Ramps &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan "i M%ideai Flow (vpnpi)900%1900ggg fetal Lost Time (s)3.o 3.0 3.0 3‘0’”3.0 Leading Detector (ft)wégoWw Trailing Detec or ft 0 Turning Spe Lane Utii Factor g”?v Fit Pmtected d Flt Permitted Satd Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd.Fiow (pr Trav ‘Time s Volume (vph)160 16 31 2961 Peak Hour Factor 90g 0.90%0 901 ’09 ) Turn Type Protected Pha Permitted Phases DetectorPhases Minimum Initial (sMinimumSplil_( Totai'épiii (s)To‘tai spiii(%)§’~‘ M mum Green s All Red Time (s ) Lead Lag Optimiz Vehicle Extensmn Recall Mode Aqt Effcl Green-(S)l Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio W Control Dela ()km.“‘M _,3”'’’ PlAdjFlow(vph ’18 ¥1 0 0 34 3290 350 350 292 31 90th %ile Green (s QOth %ile Term;C 70th %ile Green (s)191 19 1 92.9 9219 5/16/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 22 miAj900%:1900 19001 :‘i H w 'oW‘sof ()e ‘ s r s)‘ ) "§” () %% 0 e (s ? W y ) od Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak21:l-84 HOV Ramps &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan AnaiySIS Period (min 1 m Volume for 95th percentlie queue is metered by upstream Signal Splits and Phases:21:l—84 HOV Ramps &Buckland Street 5/1 8/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 23 Q‘T m2 g m4 £§ 85 5W7$W2§§WW @a€4§¥§% Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 17:Pavillions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Totai Lost Time (s) Leading Deiector'm Trailing Detector (ft) F Protected Satd Flow (pr ot Fit Permitted Satd Flow(perr‘n'/i§i htTurn’on Red Volume (vph) Peak Hour Facto 9705703022151 Turn Type Protecte has P mitted Phases inimum Split sM()Total Split (s) Yellow Time (s'All Red Time (s) Quene DelaTote!DelayLos ‘ 90th %ile Green (s) 90th %ile Term Cod 70th %ile Green (s)26.0 26.0 63.0 19.0 1910 86.0 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates.Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 2O ) )‘! r d Pes ‘ew )_ y,» w; e Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 17:Pavillions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan e'GVireken‘5 50th %lIe Term 30th %lle Green s 10th %1Ie Green (s)22 O 10th %lie Term Codw (vh 255 1851 VOC EmISSIons (g/hr) Dliemma Vehicies (# Length 50th 195 Internal Link Dist (ft)506 Tum Bay Length (Base CapaCIty (vph) tarvation Cap Reduc #95th percentlle volume exceeds caaCIt,ueue ma be loner Mueue showm imaXI m Voiume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream Signal 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 21 & o (‘)4 Code w” () G s p) f)3 ft);N S tn py q y gm Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan rkl H i'‘i‘i ll1 0'900 1900 1900 11190 4.0 4o 4o 4.0 4,0 o&5o wt 5o %50%;;5%0 V o o o o Total Lost e (s) g Detector (ftrn ) g Detector ft Flt Permitted Headway Factor ink Speed (mph)‘ V ume (vph“ak Hour Fac 583 867 ata split (s 33.0 0.0 33.0 %.2;f5v00%‘75”/ Yellow Time (s All Red Time (s Aot Effct Green (s),4.7;tE’é120 Actuated g/C Ratio Control De ay Queue Delay m y 2TotalDela98 30 0.29 1.00 90th %ile Gree (s) 90m %ile Term Cod 6 ‘K L 70th %ile Green(s)18.0 31.28 0 29.0 34.0 21 .0 27 O 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 3 Tim n () L w" ) P torhv Minimum Split ts)fl ) ) ) w e §t§$§ykM Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Vaiiey Road &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan 70th %iie Term'Co 0th %1le Green (s) 50m %lie Term Cod 30th %Ile Green (s) 30m %lIe Term Cod 10th %Ile Green (s) 10th %ile Term Co Stops (vph) Fuel Used(gal) CO Emissions (é NO)?EmisSions (g/VOC Emissions (g/hr)Dilemma Vehicies (#Length 50th ft ength 95th internal Link Dist (ft) Turn ,ay Length (ft Base Capaoityu(vph) Starvation Cap Red Splllback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reduc d e d e g hr);-’§§i§199M ) ()L (ft) )“ u t Reducedv/cRatio 1.03 0.49 0.25 0.60 0.97 0.22 1.02 0.97 0.38 0‘91 1.05 0.47 Area Typ Cycle-Length;12 Intersection Signal Deia 5 7 Intersection Capacrty U zatlon AnaIySIs Period (min)15 9'0th %ile Actuated iCycie:1 70th %iié Actu'atéd Cycie:120 50t ile Aotuated Cycie:1 30th 0th %iie Actuated Cycie 1 Volume exceeds capaCIty qu #95th percentile volume exceeds capaCIty ueue ma be loner §Queue shown is maxrmum after two cycl K hmVolumefor95thpercentilequeueismeteredbyupstreamsignal 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATAQOOO\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 4 e 0 ‘-“ y 3 20 h °/20,5: 1 19 e q y ge Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 5/1 6/2007 Fr A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 5 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 5:Pleasant Valley Road &Retail Dr.‘j r H Phase 2 Master Plan J f\.l./ Lane onfigurati ‘i HidealFléw'(vphpl)00%1 900%?1 90 Total Lost Tim'e () Leading DetéCtOr (ft‘ Trailing Detector (fl) TUrning Speed (mp Lane Util Factor Frt'» Flt Protected Satd.iFlow_(pro Fit Permittéd‘i SatdxFIdwxpema‘)%%170§§1¥3E39§g1 583%‘34333§§’1 Right Turn on Red Saft‘d‘Flow (RTOR “ Headway Factor Link Speed (n'i‘ph) Link,Distance it Turn Te Prot Protyp Protcted Phse Perted Phases Detector Phas e a Minim nitia )um Il (s 4.0 4.0MinimumSplit_(s);@90 -_20.0%, Total Slit s)1 2 7 01 Yellow Time (s)ggég t0 ”it 3 0 Al ed e Lea a OedLgptimi27 Vehicle Recall Mode ExteSionn (S)W;0 None a Max CVMa x None C M ax C M‘ax ‘n Noe “No ne 9.7 35,2 éControlDelay Queue Dela Approach Delay Approach LO 90th %iie Gren (s)17 0 17 O 90thi%ileTerm‘Cod p Coord Coord %Max Co 70th %ile Green (s)4 4 19 7 19 7 42 3 57 6 57.6 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\001 67\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 6 _1m o 9 0 é 4 0 4 O 4 0 )'”""' h x t 86 ’ gi; §§w () mit p (5 O 2 o Total Split (ww ...V... g»,o‘24 4% l R Tim(2 0 _ Lead/Lag ' 4t ,»Lag Qi0§§§Otog‘.?"y gw Sé e a a or /1 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 5:Pleasant Vailey Road &Retail Dr.Phase 2 Master Plan Reducedv/c Rato 009 056 03 0.81 .22 043 0.35 0,46 0.64 Slits and Phases:pM E5:Pleasant Valle Road &Retail Dr‘y 5/1 6/2007 F.Av Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 7 i ’5 “A ’W 6 t;: Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 8 100 0 95 Fit Permitted Séfd;Flow (perm)mRightTumonRed Satd Fiow (RTORHeadwayFactor Link Speed (mphLinkDistance(ftTrav'éi Time (sVolume(vph) Turn Type Prot Protected Phases m W§§6 r Permitted Phase Detector Phases Minimum lnitial( Minimum_S‘piiti(s Totai Spiit (s)59,0 16.0 i .”Total Spiit’(%)§&g§§§§'492%133%“13‘3%”§2.5% Maxumum Green (s)12 0 12.0 Yeiiow Time (s)myAllRedTime(s) Vehicie ExtenSIon (s)Recall Mode 11 9%“9 349%42 0 10 O 29 99.7 63.2Queue'D’eiay _»@0 0 “2&0 ‘0 W” Total Delay 99.7 ”163.2 LOSyWw Approac De yApproachLOS ‘‘90th %ile Green (s)19.0 40.0 90th %Ile Term Code Fi:‘,Max .Coor’di‘70th %Ile Green (s)9.0 9.0 12.0 12.02 42.0 63.0 ‘1 9.0 40.0 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 1 551203 m Volume for 95th percentlle queue Is metered by upstream Signal 5/1 6/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates.inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 9 gym“ Wz‘% Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan )wxiiz i H W‘‘‘Lane Conflguraiions peéd MiLaneUtllFactor Volume (vphr 90th Green (s90th%rle Term C 70th %ile Green (s) 5/16/2007 F.AA Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 1O 190 850 6 2 ‘S mi )U Fag Protected Phases “3 WPermittedPhases %e ) od Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan 4 a #95th ercentile volume exceeds caacit.ueue ma be ioner.p py q y g m Volume for 95th percentlie queue Is metered by upstream signal. Slits and Phases:7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Streetp 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 11 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan fw‘xf$</ Ad Flowvph 189 251 178 974 1133 160 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates.Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 12 j () Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan /‘\\T¢J m Volume for 95th percentHe queue is metered by upstr signaLem Slits and Phases:8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street k 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\001 67\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 13 p,‘T 2 93 17L eSed MS'VEWOO 1BS\S1Un00 p99!/\9J\Ueld A91 AOOZ KBW\L9LOO\OOOZ\VJ.VGSOH\iH uodea 9 OJuauAs '9UI ‘Salepossv ’8 H19>1$9H 'V ':l LOOZ/Qt/S 91L 0'9 8'9;s'v Z'Qz Z’gz Z'sz z93 'QZ (S)ua9199II%u106 99 vvO t 6Zt P91331°Jd 1H WM§5§$11:. Jopej nn au21 awn 1s01 lam seuéj a'EeJozg 1;)Lu6ue1 aBeicns (IdqdA)Mo’s leap!suouemSuuog euE’] u2ld Jasew z eseud wens puemong Q wens 6ugweg :6 Xead LVS D9U!qw00 OLOZ s6u!u1u_‘seLunl0/\‘seuej ’{g ;WE‘k: I ( i Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 9:Deming Street &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Actuated Cycle Length 120 Intersection Caactt Utilization 62 9%py m Volume for 95th pe cen ie queue is metered by upstream Signal Slits and Phases:9:Demin Street &Buckland Street 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Incl Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA,sy7 Page 15 p g HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 Combined SAT Peak 10:Deming Street &Site Drive Phase 2 Master Plan Pedestrians vCu unblocked vol 252 479 230 cSH 1700 1700 1313 1700 530 809 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 3 9 mi Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Master Plan x‘w ‘x i i ¥mwBm‘ 1 00 1 008%59 058’3g ’$atd.Flow(protfm i @1'f0 Satd “Flow (per Right Turn on Red Permitted Phases VehiclérEXie'nsion;(s)% ‘ )’: ‘'m. RecaH Mode None pApproach LOS 5/16/2007 Ft A.Hesketh &Associates,inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBAisy7 Page 17 mé . m): Nam, ”‘E\§a t §@%“if%§ Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Master Plan Queue Length 95th (ftnkDist‘(ft)‘1é(tyLengthf Analysus 2+ Slits and Phases:12:Town Center Dr &p 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 18 ) I isI w gz 969d MS‘VQWOO IES\SlUn00 P93!/\SJ\U9Id A31 LOOZ AEW\L9LOO\OOO&VJ.VGSOH\1H uodeg 9 OJqou/(s '0UI ‘9919!90SSV ’8 H19>1S9H ‘V ':!LOOZ/QL/S O $01 qoemddv o a 0'0 0‘0 ”TL'L’Z @e‘v 000000 %LD€%L 09 %LVL % (u)eoualSIo >IUI‘I...E (qdw)paeds ){un Jomej AEMpeeH 96'0 96'0 Jena 'mn aue1 uam)paeds 5uiumi (u)Jo1oa1aa BumeJlwogi§m ymvOS $09g§§§aw 10109190 Emma-1‘0's oé ‘09 0's 0's»0":0‘2»? ~05 09 02 (S)emu 1s01 12m‘09 006t OO6L We (IdudA)M01;leepisuouem6ghogeué1 8&WW 3%"89W aggggaj“ w T x o’¢ u2ld Jasew z eseud ’9 peoa u015uma $8 Need IVS PQUMUJOO OLOZ s6u!uJ!J_‘sawnIOA ‘seue‘l Lanes,V0lumes,Timings 2010 Combined SAT Peak 33:Ellington Road &Phase 2 Master Plan 90th %lle Term Code 701h %lle Green (s)70th %ile T m Co p ) Fuel Used(gal) CG Emissions (g/hfNOxEmlssmns(VOC Emissmns ( Dilemma Vehicles (# Actuated Cycle L Natural Cycle 60 lnterseclion Signal D ela intersection Capacny Utilization 7O 4%ICU Level of Sewice C 70th %ile Actuated Cycle 50th %ile Actuated Cycl 71 1 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 27 d § )’,3§§£% g/ g/h ) eng A W 7 e 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 ReportH:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMBA.sy7 Page 28 Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined33:Ellington Road &Phase Splits and Phases:33:Ellington Road & SAT Peak 2 Master Plan x m1iilmléw f ‘\95 1W1 \ Saturday Combined Traffic with Improvements Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 24:i-84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Tr\i¥ F%WBT%SB" Total Lost Time (s Leading Detector ' Trailing Detector (ft) Flt Permitted O 950 O 952 Said.Ftqw,_(perrn)%§§§2éiéhtTurnonRed Satd Flow(RTO Headway Factor Link Speed (mph Link Distance,Travet Time Volume (vph Turn Type Protected Phas Permitted Phases Minimum Initi Minimum‘Split‘ Total Split (s 5o o 0. otal Split (%7%41 Vehicle Extensio Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s Actuated g/C Ratio Approach Delay Approach LOS 90th %iie Green (s)46 o 90th %ile Term CodeewMax $§M 70th %ile Green (s)46 0 4 5/1 6/2007 Ft A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 24 -réat'x ’Co’ord gW 18D 66.0 BR i ) (ft) 2 ,Hi :a ,.......50853751583,I ‘ V R ) (s ) es a ts)’v ‘ 50 T ).7% n (3mm ‘ ) 0 3 0 39 9 0.39 §..i030 %090 $055 I" 46 0’4a 6 O M Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 24:l-84 EB Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan #95th ercenme volume exceeds caacn,ueue ma be Ionerppyqyg 5/1 6/2007 Fe A,Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA‘sy7 Page 25 m4 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp‘SAT Peak 21:I-84 HOV Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan )w‘xii v vi t Actuated g/C Ratio O 15 O 15 O 80 0 80 0 80 90th %ile Green (s) 90th %Iie Term Cod 70th %iie Green (s) 5/1 6/2007 F.AA Hesketh &Associates,inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA,sy7 Page 22 i r ‘m mWVa900 ef ' Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 21:1-84 HOV Ramps &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Area Type Cycle Length 120 Actuated Ccle Length 120 lntersectlon CaaCIt Utilization 58 4%ICU Level of SerVIce Bpy m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream Signal 5/1 6/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA‘sy7 Page 23 , y Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 17:Paviliions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations [deaf Flow'()i‘phpliTotalLostTime (s 90th %ile Green ) ile Term A aile Green (s) 5/16/2007 Fl A,Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impAtsy7 Page 2O gy‘”) ma: ( 9‘0t %Code Fit ermitted Satd Fiow(perrn)%$%xiii? Right Turn on Red Travel Time (s)Volumetvph)570 302 21é1 97o L ”T 903%0 90i§§0 903 Adj Flow(vph)633 336 2390 1078 38 182 1é99 Lane Group Flow (vph)3%,' Minimum Split (Total Split (s) :T ‘al Split (%MaXImum Green (s) Yellow Time (s)All Red Time (s) Recall Mode ActEffctGreen(s):'ék '‘3 12o o§§l Actuated g/C Ratiot 0.22 0.22 0 55 1 00 Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined w/imp.SAT Peak 17:Pavillions Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan W 70th %iie e r 50th %lie Term 30th %Ile Green 30m %ile Ter 15837725042808o‘ S rage Ca Reduced v/c intetsectio Area Type: #95t percentile volume exceeds caaCIt,ueue ma be loner m Volume for 95th percentlle queue Is metered by upstream slgnai 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnci Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impAisy7 Page 21 C (m C p msumm'ary: h py q y g§§E 2 g 962d MS'VdUJ!8WOO 1€S\Slun00 DQSMQAUEH A91 LOOZ Aewug L00\OOOZ\VJ_VGSOH\1H uodaa 9 OJqou/(s ‘OUI ‘SalBDOSSV ’9 H19H89H 'V ':l LOOZ/QL/Q 0‘8z (S)ueeJs)9lI%um poo we;em H106 (S)ueeJs ell%H106 Aelaq Lpemddv s 919VVLO‘LZ O'LZ O'vQ 0'63 ouea 0/6 pelemav S)uaa’Js xdga‘ )mds 12 (s)1Ilds 12ms)“ids umunulw lemul umwuuw 101d 991:] €€ 9 giga L6Z 1769 V69 $17 V6V 329 ones(udxmb-‘tpvJnoH xeaa dA)eL AuuO g Jomej EMpeeH paa uo umi luEIa uued)Mold ,pxes PawlUJQd 1l:l (10VJd)‘:MoH:p1é§ Jopei Inn eu21 u)peeds 6uluml(u)Jo1oe1aa 6uuleJi s e 1s0']le1ol I O v 7'00m 00m umd Je1sew z aseqd wens pueppng 19 peog AeueA lueseeld :17 Wad ivs 'dwl /M PSUMHJOO OLOZ s6uguni ‘seLumoA ‘seum ‘e ‘%%o1 (wv r %m v ‘( ) 9 ez @ 6 ‘‘g§a *’;J A (awmli‘mes‘ w ’( L )wli W (dudA)MH 129m 0 01 A Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan K‘\t/*\¢J 70th %Ile er m C 50th %lle Green (s lle rm Cd 30th e Green (s e ‘QeLeert o ft lnternal k ft Control T Actuated Uncoordrnatedype Anal Ped )15 90th %1Ie Actua ‘d Cycie 120 70th e Actuated Ccl 120 #95th ercene volume exceeds caa ueue mabe lone§m Volume for 95th percentl|e queue Is metered by upstream nalSig 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 4 50th %Te oe %Il ) Illemma Vehrcls (#)’ u'iVV‘Li’gh bth ()Quéue‘tedgth‘95th‘(ft)“yaqegLinDr() ySIs rlo (mm %Il ye Is maXImum after two cycies %M%.‘‘..e ;wegg} ptil pCIty q y‘grE§Queue shown Is maXImu a tw cyclesW , Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 4:Pleasant Valley Road &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Slits and Phases:4:Pleasant Valle Road &Buckland Street 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 5 p y Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 5:Pleasant Valley Road &Retail Dr.Phase 2 Master Plan l />\l J’a8%3% Lane Conflguratuons ’i M FIdealFlow(vphpl)§900§1900x§$§1900 J 19 Total Lost Time (s) Flt Permllted Satd Flow(perm’) R h Turn on Red H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA‘sy7 Page 6 B 3§ ;l4 0 4 Lead/Lag ‘ Lead Lag Opllmlze’? Vehlcle Extensuon (s)LRecallMode None Act Effct Green (s)eé§l§7§§§'5‘: Actuated g/C Ratlo 0.06 70th %Ile Green (s)197 197 423 576 576 130 130 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 5:Pleasant Valley Road &Retail Dr.Phase 2 Master Plan Actuated Ccle Lenth 90yg Slits and Phases:5:Pleasant Valle Road &Retail Dr.p y 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 7 g 362d MS‘VdLU!BWOO 1€S\Slun00 DQSMSJWEId A91 LOOZ KEWMQL00\OOOZ\VJ_VGSOH\1H uodea 9 mqouAs '9Ul ‘391BFJOSSV ’8 H19X39H 'V ‘d LO0Z/9t/9 0 LL (S)ueeJs au%umooLUIS;ell%Luce S)uaaJs ell%u106 O 00'93 9 0 '92 01L 0L0 980zz v _,té zeuoNeuoN 990W “9398 §§j§umsumx3 elmqeA (,eZIuJudo 5e1 peej (s)eun_;_m¢w o“ (s)ueeJs wnwlxew0930€L 0€L 01L OSZ ”/clQS %ZVL %Z?L %9ZV %9£oo/S~ vV OtL OLL OLS OLZ '(S)1ns mm S)ul'ds wnwwm )le!1!UI wnwww ésesetw Joweje'd sesaqd pawuued ggw’seseud pawawJddsed/(i u ni’é ’‘Vi ‘1‘$L8 171m v83 96 696 L69 9Lz 89L m 96g L9t £6 §§zmd10 Méfgvdrimg (udA)MOH eUéj'[pv pea uo umiwa$§§awmdmmd m pauIwJed 1H zgggdMOH m dw)peads 6uxu1n_ (u)Jaiéauea 6Umeu (19 Momea 6u1p291 (S)auJu :sdi Iaiél ueid Je1sew z aseqd wens puemong 19 eAuQ xoeJewei :9 Xeed LVS 'dlUl /M P9U!qw00 OLOZ s6u!Lu!L ‘sawnloA ‘seuej p ( § 3;;H n d”( S g gu. £es g es u l_ 1% Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Pian ptil pcrty q y g#95th ercene volume exceeds caa ueue ma be Ioner m Voiume for 95th percentde queue Is metered by upsiream Signal 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 9 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Conflgurahons Idea!Flow (vphp! Tdtal Lost Time (s) Leading Detector (ftTralilngDetectorft Fit ermitted Satd.Flow (per Riht Turn on Red ow:(RT(; Headway Factor Link Speed (mpLinkDistance (ft TraVeI Time (svolume(vph)‘ Peak Hour Fac Adj Flow (vph) Lane Group Fiow'(V T rn Type 1.00 100 100 1.00 889 1075 Minimum Split (, Total Split (s) Total Split (%)&‘§§§K§%§2 Maxrmum Green s 2 Actuated g/C Ratio ‘e 70th %ile Green (s) 5/16/2007 F.AA Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 10 () )*h m g l&;) h ) ) to p k 5 O ()6 0 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 7:Hemlock Drive &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan py(pBaseCaaCItvh)384 669 390 2612 1856 #95th ercentlle volume exceeds caacut,ueue ma be lonerppyqyg Slits and Phases:7:Hemlock Drive &Buckland Streetp 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 11 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan a'n‘”§E6 Lane Confiurans i Flow (hl)'deal vpp Satd Flow >(pr Flt Permitted Headway Factor Link S eed (mph) (p) Peak Hour Fator Ad Flow(vh) Volume vh c 195 251 ow (vph)3l3§§195%2 j p Fl 51 Protected ases Perted Phases s in s “ 2 43‘0 16.0 9 .'- ead/Lagy maizLeadLagptle’ Recall Mode Act EffctGreen (s) Actuated g/C Ratio .5 gt x26 6%96 5 §96 5g§85 4 013 022 080 080 O71 Approach Delay Approach L0 90th %Ile Green 70th %lle Green (s) 5/1 6/2007 F.At Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 12 gtio 0t)k Ph mit 7 0 3 023225?358‘7/313%’77 . L emlz? 5 %! 8 Lanes,Voiumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream signal Slits and Phases:8:Cedar Avenue &Buckland Streetp 5/16/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 13 vL 958d MS‘VdlU!BWOO IBS\S)Un00 P95!A9J\Ueld A9J A002 K€W\19L00\OOOZ\VLVGSOH\1H uodaa g omouKs 'OUI ‘SEJEDOSSV ‘8 HISHSSH ‘V ‘d LOOZ/QL/Q Z'gz Z‘sz (S)ueeJE)el!%woeZ'QZ Misc le10i§Ae1ag eneno L88 VOL epow ”mayuogsue1x3alamaA S)ewu pea nv )awli MoneA 9a o 9a o 9z%o ’9z %o 9%%o é?“%o €€§$§m§w mds r S )ulds 121m ueld JeJSEW z eseqd 1eaJ1S puemona y wens 6U!LueQ :6 xeed ivs 'dwl /M pamqwoo 0Loz s6u!u1u_‘sewnloA ‘sauaj é ) (s 9 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 9:Deming Street &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Naturai Cycle 60 m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream signal Slits and Phases:9:Demin Street &Buckland Streetpg 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnct Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 15 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 Combined w/imp.SAT Peak 10:Deming Street &Site Drive Phase 2 Master Plan H 1700 1700 1313 1700 530 809 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates.Ino.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA,sy7 Page 3 '7 w¢S Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Masier Plan Lane Configurations Idea!Flowivphpi)%&1TotalLostTime(s) Leading Detector (Tralling Detector (ft)TufhihgWSpe''edgtriioh Lane Util Factor Flt Protected Sé‘tdEFlovv'(pr Fit Permitted Link Speed (Link Distance ( Travel Time (volume (vph) Peak Hour Fact Adj Flow (vph) Lane Group Fm!(yTurnType Protecte’diPhase Permitted Phases 29.5 2 905 685V83%754% Vehicle Extension ( Recall Mode Walk Time (s Fiash Dent Waik s)11.0 11 11 11 Effct Green s v/c Ra Queue Dela la LOS Approach LOS 5/16/2007 F‘A.Hesketh &Associates,Incl Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 17 %§ www )“...‘..W ?)4 mp e)f o‘ p s 20 ((0‘ W OV o Eu A () Actuated g/C Rati . tio Control Delay yTotalDey Approach Delay Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/imp.SAT Peak 12:Town Center Dr &Phase 2 Master Plan »w\t¢# 36m '%ne Green (sy 30th %ile férm Code tops (vpFuelUsed(gal ‘(g/irCO:Emissions f NOx Emissmns g/hr) VOC Emissmns (g/hr) DIlemma Vehicles (#) ength 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th t lntemai Link Dist (Turn Bay Length (ft Cycle Length 120 Actuated Cycle Length Intersection Signal Dela ction Capactty U is Period (min)15 lume for»:95th pe Slits and Phases:12:Town Center Dr &p 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Incl Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 18 m‘ S h) ) % L w)ft ‘ ) ; 12 y 5 8 )Retilizat s .o r QZ 959d MS‘VdLU!8WOO IBS\S1Un03 P93!/\9J\Ueld A9J Looz K€W\L9LOO\OOOZ\V.LVCISOH\iH uodaa 9 OJLpu/(s ‘OUI ‘3919!0053V ’8 H19>l39H 'V ‘:l LOOZ/9l/9 301 LpeOJddv 5; ’Kéiea qbeoJddV seseud penguuad~sasgud pemawJaedAl LiJni’dA MOE anmé QUé‘I (udA)M013 IpvASZZELvLZ 8H 992 pewwed 1H d)MOH m 96'0 960 OO‘L 96'0 96'0 OO'L 00L OO'l OO'L 96‘0 S6'0 OO'L 10109:!'l!m 9U9 d’uj)'p'éads 6uxu1n (S)ewu 1s01 lewiggudum)MOH Ieepl suoueJnBuuoo auej ueld Jasew z aseqd ’8 P908 U015UHI3 188 Nead J_VS ‘dLUI IM PQUMLUOO OLOZ sBuuugi ‘seLunloA ‘sauej £ f (q) w es 1ul iw Lanes,Volumes‘Timings 2010 Combined w/Imp.SAT Peak 33:Ellington Road &Phase 2 Master Plan Starvation Cap Reductn O Spxllback Cap Reductn §a “éé 0 10th %Ile Actuated Cycle 65 3 h percentlte volume exc Queue shown Is maXImum a ter two cycles 5/1 6/2007 F‘A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Repon H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA‘sy7 Page 27 % t e 5/16/2007 F,A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Repon H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB impA.sy7 Page 28 Lanes‘Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/ 33:Ellington Road &Phase Splits and Phases:33:Ellington Road & Imp.SAT Peak 2 Master Plan \’1 $4 2xm51?l%wi&éi H Analysis of Pedestrian Phase Buckland Road &Tamarack Drive Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/PED PM Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckiand Street Phase 2 Master Plan Lane Configurations Ideél Flow (vphpi Total Lost Time (s) Leading Detector (ft)W WOWW Trailing Detector (ft)o 0 0 Turning/“Speed (mph)§WLanekUtilFeetor 0 Fft mmFltProtected Satd Flow (prot)$3 wrw"OW 3 Fli Permitted ht Turn on Red Satd Flow (RTOR Headwa Factor 1.00 10 10 10 1.00 Volume vh) Ad.Flow(vh Turn Tpe Potectedr Paseh 58 97 159 64 107 231%: 12 0 2 120 280 180 52‘0 64.0 Recall Mode G 1 71 0.10”‘‘ 0 6 O 55g 0 50 7 17 90th %ile Green (s) 90th_%ile Term Cod£§ 70th %ile Green (s)11.0 5/1 6/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\PM COMB PED A.sy7 Page 1 8.0 14.0 72.0 ) ‘ 5 ‘’ 5 483 Rig y ”e 353W m 0 0 0 Travel Time (s (p Peak Hour Facto j p) Lane Group Flowm m l y 091 W o mam 0%10 Act Effct reen (s)g 00 0 § Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/PED PM Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan Totai Lost Time (s)Leading Detector (ftTrailinDetector(ft) Lane Utii.Fator o pFitPerted Riht Turn on Red a HeadNay Factr Link Speed (mphLinkDistance(ftTraveiTime(s) Volume (vph) P ak Hour Fact Ad Flow vph Turn Type Protected Pha Permitted Phases Detector Phas Minimum lnitial(5‘0 Minimum Split (s) Total Spiii (s) ' T‘tal‘Split ( s e )‘ %)7 Yellow Time All Red Time (s Lead Lag Opimize’7 Vehicle Extension_(s keéaii Mode 90th %Ile Green (s) 90th %ile Term Co d ,_ 70th %ile Green (s)0.0 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\PM COMB PED A.sy7 Page 3 ) g Tuming Speed (mphe Fiw (ro mit.... g $td._Flow (RTOR)‘ i o ) ) or j () (s)) t ) Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/PED PM Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 0 0;"11.11. Base Capac vh 401 2153 1135 177 2083 Storage Cap Redu Reduced v/c Ratio 0‘43 0.96 0.55 0‘04 0.99 0‘60 Area Type Cycle Length 120 Actuated Cycle Length 120 O nce I _ffset 0(O%),Refere #95th percentlle volume exc §‘ue shown is maXI m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream signal 5/16/2007 Ft A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\PM COMB PED A.sy7 Page 4 (50th %ile Green s) 50th %ile Tenn Cod 30th %ile Green s)(r Tum Bay Length (ft)ny (p) ~“ Intersectlon Capacny U tl|I Anaiysis Period (mln)1 e Q e Lanes,Volumes.Timings 2010 Combined w/PED PM Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc,Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\OO167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\PM COMB PED A.sy7 Page 5 L eSed MS'V 03d 8WOO 19S\31U“03 PQS!A9J\UBld AQJ AOOZ ‘9W\i9L00\000aVLVCISOH\1H uodea 9 OJuou/(S ‘oul ‘selepossv ’8 H19>139H 'V ':l LOOK/9 L/Q (S)uews 6l!%um 8V0 9V0 99'0 Z90 LZO 930 0L0 0L0 380 80'0 OREH 0/palenwv 96'0 96‘0 OO'L 96‘0 suoueJn5uuoo euej #T\«/¢\wa/‘K‘F’f u2ld Jeusew z aseud 199113 pueppng )9 eAua xoeJeLuei :9 Xead LVS GBd /M P9U!qw00 OLOZ s6u!w!J_‘saLumoA ‘sauej 5 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/PED SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan ¢ Lead Lag Optimize? 70th /olle Green (s)0.0 5/16/2007 F.A.Hesketh &Associates,inc.Synchro 6 Repon H:\HCSDATA\2000\00187\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB PED A.sy7 Page 3 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 2010 Combined w/PED SAT Peak 6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Street Phase 2 Master Plan \ir\i</ py (p)Base Caacn vh 290 783 168 177 581 715 1843 1068 295 1678 Area Type: Qic’'iie‘gi #95th ercentile voiume exceeds caacn,ueue ma be Ionerppyqyg til Is SigmVolumefor95thpercenequeuemeteredbyupstream nal Slits and Phases:6:Tamarack Drive &Buckland Streetp 5/1 6/2007 Ft A.Hesketh &Associates,lnc.Synchro 6 Report H:\HCSDATA\2000\00167\May 2007 rev Plan\revised counts\Sat COMB PED A.sy7 Page 4 §Mé3§l~”‘ w‘" 5 'a Utility Impact Statement For Evergreen Walk South Windsor,Connecticut lune 18,200] Revised lulv 9,2007 Developer:Evergreen Walk Associates,LLC c/o John Finguerta 1109 Rose Lane Virginia Beach,VA 23451 FUSS &O’NEILL Ditup'lincx m Ddhwr Engineer:Civil and Environmental Fuss &O’Neill 146 Hartford Road Manchester,CT 06040 RECEIVED Project N0.2llllll—48la\lll dl Ii 7 0 [0'07v UUTH ll/uVDSDR MANN/N6 DEPT FUSS 8cO’NEILL UTILITY IMPACT STATEMENT FOR EVERGREEN WALK SOUTH WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT SECTION PAGE EXHIBITS Site Locau'on Plan Water Supply Exhibit Sanitary Sewer Exhibit G'\PZUUO\4BI\1\‘I0\U'l'ILITYREPOR’l‘j;\YS PROPOSED CHANGES 2007 0709.DOC Cortes.(HQ)i INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 A.Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................1 B.Site Location .....................................................................................................1 C.Project Description ...........................................................................................1 II.WATER SUPPLY ......................................................................................................2 A.Projected Public Water Supply Requirements ...................................................2 B.Existing Water System ......................................................................................2 C.Proposed Improvements ...................................................................................3 D.Conclusion ........................................................................................................3 III .SANITARY SEWERS ...............................................................................................3 A.Projected Sewage Flows From Proposed Project ..............................................3 B.Existing Sewerage Facilities ...............................................................................4 C.Proposed Improvements ...................................................................................4 D.Conclusion ........................................................................................................4 IV.STORM DRAINAGE ................................................................................................5 A.Exisn'ng Conditions ..........................................................................................5 B.Proposed Detention and Storm Sewer System ..................................................5 V.OTHER UTILITIES ................................................................................................6 A.Electric Power ..................................................................................................6 B.Gas ...................................................................................................................6 C.Communicau'ons ...............................................................................................6 0 FUSS $5 O’NEILL Purpose and Scoge This U1i1ity Impact Statement has been prepared in accordance with the most current revisions to the Town of South Windsor Zoning Regulations.Its purpose is to define,in a general way,the projected impact that the proposed land uses and intensities will have on the Town's infrastructure,with particular emphasis on: 1.Water supply and distribution system 2.Sanitary sewers 3.Stormwater management Site Location The development site is located in the south central part of the Town of South Windsor north of the Manchester town line.It is approximately 243 acres in size and is generally bounded on the north by Deming Street,on the east by Buckland Road,on the south by Smith Street and on the west by Plum Gulley Brook (Exhibit 1).On—site existing topographic elevations range from 70 to 150 feet above mean sea level.The major roadway network that will provide primary access to this project has been reviewed and is further discussed in a separate Trafnc Impact Study. Project Description The 243 acre site has been used for farming for many years.Currently,The Shoppes at Evergreen Walk,a retail center;ECHN,a medical ofnce building, and LA Fitness,an indoor recreation center,have been constructed.Additional projects are in various stages of construction or approval,including Phase 2 of “The Shoppes”and a second medical office complex for ECHN.The proposed revised Evergreen Walk project anticipates the following development: The location of Evergreen Walk is shown on the accompanying Locanon Plan (Exhibit 1).The utilities necessary to support the proposed development area G:\P2000\481 \:\10\U’I'ILITYRE1’OR’1‘jAYS PROPOSED CHANGES 2007 0709DOC Cortes.(HQ)1 INTRODUCTION A. TABLE 1 Land Use Proposed Size Hotel 250 rooms Indoor recreation 75,000 SF Ofnce 550,000 SF Retail 725,000 SF Residential 200 “nits FUSS &O’NEILL are shown on Exhibit 2 (\X/ater Supply)and Exhibit 3 (Sanitary Sewer).The storm drainage watershed for the site is shown on Exhibit 1. II.WATER SUPPLY A.Projected Public Water Supgly Reguirements Based on the table of uses indicated in Table I and as shown on the Land Use Study,a projection of domestic water requirements was prepared.This projection is detailed in Table 2 and,in general,is self-explanatory In accordance with the usual and customary practice,the tabulated flows must be available for usage at residual pressures in the ranging from a low of 25 pounds per square inch to a maximum of about 110 pounds per square inch. Requirements for water for fire protection purposes were determined based on the proposed development.Relative to retail areas,current standards indicate that a fire flow of 2,000 to 3,000 gpm at a 25 psi minimum residual pressure for up to a three hour period may be required. Existing Water System The existing public water system is owned by the Connecticut Water Company (CWC).The system is operated by the CWC Northern Division,with offices at 25 North Road,East Windsor,CT 06088.A 12 inch water main fronts the site on three sides,Deming Street on the north,Buckland Road on the east,and Smith Sueet on the south (Exhibit 2). G:\P2000\481 \.r\1U\U'I‘II.I'lYlUiPOR’l'JAYS PROPOSED CHANGES 2007 [)709DOC Corres.(HQ)2 TABLE 2 Land Use Unit Flow Peak Daily FlowU) Peak Hourly Flow?)Average Daily Description Size (SF)(Gal/Day)Flow (Gal)(Gal)(Gal/Min) OfEce 550,000 0.11/S.F.60,500 121,000 242,000 Hotel 250 Rms 150/R.m 37,500 75,000 150,000 Indoor Recreation 75,000 0.1 S/S.F.11,250 22,500 45,000 Retail 725,000 0.10/S‘F.72,500 145,000 290,000 Residential 200 150/Rm 45,000 90,000 180,000 Units/300 rooms (1)Peak daily flow is 2.0 times the demand for an average day. (2)The peak hour demand is 2,0 nines the peak daily rate. FUSS &O’NEILL A fire flow test conducted by the CWC on October 23,2006 at a hydrant on Buckland Road yielded a flow of 1,135 gallons per minute (gpm)with a residual pressure of 7O pounds per square inch (psi).The Stank:pressure was 90 psi.The hydrant tested is located near the existing Old Navy storei Currently,one water main services ECHN and the approved ECHN H.lt branches off of the Deming Street water main and extends south along Tamarack Avenue. The service for LA Fitness branches off of Buckland Road and extends west along Cedar Avenue.In addinon,a water main branches off of Buckland Road at the southern end and extends west along Tamarack Avenue.This water line follows Evergreen Way north for a portion,splits,and then recombines and is capped near the existing Old Navy and Highland Park Market.This line services The Shoppes at Evergreen Walk. C.Proposed Improvements Ultimately,the Tamarack Avenue extension at the north end of the site will create a loop to the Cedar Avenue stub once additional development for this area is completed.The Evergreen Way water line will also complete a loop. That configuration has not yet been determined. D.Conclusion In conclusion,it is our opinion that the existing and proposed water facilities will be adequate to provide water service for domestic and fire fighting purposesinthequantitiesandpressuresrequiredtosupportthedevelopmentproposedherein III.SANITARY SEWERS A‘Projected Sewage Flows from Proposed Project This General Plan of Development proposes five land uses:office,hotel, recreation,retail,and residential It is anncipated that sewage will be generatedfromthisprojectinthefollowingamounts: (}:\I’2000\481\.\10\U’l‘II‘IT\’RP,POR'l'jAYS PROPOSED CHANGES 2007 0709.DOC Corres.(HQ)3 TABLE 3 Typical Land Use Descripu'on Size(s.F_)Unit Flow (U (Gal/Day) Average Daily Flow (Gal) Office 550,000 0.11 /S.F.60,500 Hotel 250 rooms ISO/rm 37,500 Indoor Recreation 75,000 0.15/S.Fi 11,250 Retail 725,000<2l 0.10/SIF,72,500 Residential 200 units/300 rooms 150/rm 45,000 (”All units of flow were estimated from data generated by Fuss &O'Neill for similar types ofestablishments/uses(Zllncluding restaurants FUSS &O’NEILL The following table summarizes the total average daily flow and includes a contribution from groundwater inflow: B.Existing Sewerage Facilides The Evergreen Walk site lies within the wasteshed area of the Clark Street sewage pump station.Gravity sewers are located in Deming Street (northernboundaryofthesite),Clark Street (west of the site),Wheeler Road (south of the site)and in Smith Street west of Wheeler Road (southwest of the site).All of these sewers flow by gravity to the Clark Street pump station. In 1995,Weston and Sampson performed a sewer study of the Buckland Road wasteshed,and determined the most cost effective sewering plan for the wasteshed.The most cost effective sewer alignment to serve what is now the Evergreen Walk site was found to be a gravity sewer which connected to the existing sewer system on Clark Street.Such an alignment included the installation of 1,900 lineal feet of 12 inch sewer from a manhole north of the Clark Street pump station to the western property line of Evergreen Walk, generally as shown on Exhibit 3.From that point,the ennre site could be served.The new alignment is in place and referred to as the Gateway Trunk Sewer.This alignment required the crossing ofwetlands and Plum Gulley Brook. Improvements to the capacity of the Clark Street pump station are not required to accommodate sewage flows anticipated by the proposed General Plan of Development. Proposed Improvements There are no additional off-site improvements required for the proposedEvergreenWalkdevelopment. Conclusion The quantity of sewage to be discharged from the uses proposed in the preliminary development plan can be adequately served by the exisnng Town of South Windsor sewerage facilities G:\P2000\481 \/\10\UTII.I'lYREl’OR'l'jAYS PROPOSED Cl L\N(}I£S 2007 0709.1)0C Corres.(HQ)4 TABLE 4 Contributing Peak Design Sewage Average Daily Peak Daily Flow Peak Infiltration Source Flow (Gal)<1)(Gal) Arm (Acres)243 Ac x 60%(1)Flow (Gal) Flow (gal/day) Project Site 226,750 907,000 146 146,000 1,053,000 (1)Assumes a Peaking Factor of 4.0 for the mixed—use development (1)peak Infiltration =acreage x 1000 gallons/day 0 FUSS Bz O’NEILL IV.STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A.Existing Conditions The proposed project is situated on a parcel of land containing 243 acres located west of Buckland Road,north of Smith Street and south of Deming Street. Plum Gulley Brook runs near the westerly boundary of the project and is actually within the project area for a distance of about 2400 feet.There are two unnamed streams on the site that are tributary to Plum Gulley Brook.One of the streams runs along the southerly boundary and originates south of Smith Street.The larger stream flows west to east from Buckland Road about 2,000 feet north of Smith Street.This second stream,which originates on the east side of Buckland Road,joins Plum Gulley Brook within the project area. In addition to the stormwater runoff from within the project area,there are about 190 acres east of Buckland Road that drain to the project.Part of this flow is from the detention basin constructed as a part of the Lowe's/Target project.It is assumed that any future construction within the drainage area east of Buckland Road will include detennon facilities that will maintain flow rates equal to existing levels. All of the stormwater runoff from the site and the area east of Buckland Road discharges to Plum Gulley Brook.A little over one mile downstream of the proposed development,Plum Gulley Brook and Whaples Brook join at Vintons Mill Pond to form the Podunk River. Proposed Detention and Storm Sewer System In order to minimize environmental damage and the possibility of increased runoff overloading downstream drainage facilities,stormwater best management pracdces (BMPs)will be utilized both during and after construction.A series of sedimentation and detention basins will be constructed to control sediment and peak storm flows.Infiltration of storrnwater will be utilized where geologic conditions permit During the design stage,efforts will be made to create detention and innltration basins that are aesthetically pleasing and nuisance free. During construcdon,erosion control measures will be installed to minimize erosion and sedimentation.Haybale erosion checks and silt fence will be installed where needed.Sedimentation basins will be constructed when needed. In some cases,detennon basins may be used as temporary sedimentation basins.All erosion control measures will be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the latest edition of Connecticut “Guidelines for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control”. G:\I’2001)\481 \Al U\U’I‘ILI'I‘YRL‘POR’I‘jAYS PROPOSED CHANGES 2007 0709.DOC Cones.(HQ)5 0 FUSS SzO’NEILL V.OTHER UTILITIES A.Electric Power Past discussions with off1cials of Connecticut Light and Power indicate that no major problems exist relative to the supply of power to the proposed site.New service to the site is and will continue to be underground. Gas Yankee Gas has a main line in Deming Street that is adequate to serve the proposed development. Communications There is adequate telephone and data service available to the proposed development. (}:\P2000\481 \;\1U\U’I'Il .I’l‘YREI’OR'l'J AYS PROPOSED CI [AN (Hi3 2007 0709.DOC Cortes.(HQ)6 NEE _ m2_ uz<sz_ ism ”E3 2E =§ziees§xaoo~a§sa§ :oaoz E<F3o8~§e§m an: Ezmua. .msu._== ”3&3 oo._ eni 3s 2a iaam: .ma EON N3 “.3: awe . PROJ MANAGER SCALE WWW.FondO.CDM 860.646.2469 FUSS &O'NEILLDisciplinea‘to Deliver MANCHESTER,CT 06040146HARTFORDRD CONN ECTICUT EVERGREEN WALK LLC EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT SOUTH WINDSOR CHIEF DESIGNER:HORZ: REV‘EWED EY.DA TE VERT,’ DATUM: HORZ, VERY: GRAPHIC SCALE DDATEDESCRIPT‘ON BY REV‘SIONS I & ‘m Sh ... 75E 083w _.om.wm . .. 34.3zoumti/ .5 3 . zmg ) «a? cwwSmm .mgez<mc<:c gas .mEy 332.5 Eot st“? how EB x §h amE 3M ..... omgmgw 63$ .. 5%.0. BEwEoo cm $833. ovoE MA.u ._ku§a » mz<§opm <N<1E _.§__ y; ._ n _.E ;Q_,.93 aaoxmvI ‘—\z-jUv ‘V'nmégéi' @K /\ ‘ 7 . w m _ n zL , . \J .< L1 i .. _, r a _V o 200mm 369E: . uzlu: $3$%‘ _ f )$§ 7 @ia_§,¢.. \ Elk .q 5”. a .:.v u... 3w), .. 7 6.. kw i, aw .ZxmE 1 v..._...,\‘4. H$m.§mnmwx>.~ mzzmmd . ‘ .- l..- .i/ , .. .p a .. V n. “$2 322mg . ..‘. Q04... ,ycca ,. . mmzm x233 V mam: aukagizi‘ .E :Ccu Efcci; NOTE:PROF0$ED EUWLDINGS TO BE CONNECTED TO WATER LINE :xusmm mm?UN : Ex‘snm:mm?LIN : WWWumm§mmmwuWWW ppm mmwc“ME"m 1 As w «mm ‘3 “wfwmm WW,A mwuumw WM MW WWW"mm,on m “WW”w mmwwwWW mm,mm WWW mm. w “WW:umW“JwmwmWWH2;mm m M FLB AmNhuwl i Plannhli,Inc.I!Sllnl lane E$sl Hamom U IISHEmwatmmmsm»(Iiulsil-tnsn In:mama-5119 n-mn;"wan-mum uh:www.mmunm , q t NOTE:PROPOSED BU‘LDINGS TO BE CONNECTED TO SANITARY LINE 3:v : WmmtsgémmwmmmwMWWW mm m Mm”IU‘SNCuowwmam m(mtmww mm mm.mummwmwn‘vmmmwm mmw a; mm wwm(,mmmhownhmmm m W n5 Amman-n s Vlannlnu Inn("mil-Inn n:(“minim-Ia sum una Em namnm c1 nsnun-mu:"mnnnmnm nun:unJInanmam ;M mW W :umm PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF EVERGREEN WALK (updated 7/12/2007) Address Owner Mailing Address (E different)Man/Lot Land Use Evergreen Walk Planned Unit Development: Unit #1 (Expo)35 Tamarack Ave.Buckland Road Retail LLC 6410 Popular Ave.STE 850,27/15 Vacant Com. Memphis TN 381 19 Unit #2 (The Shops at Evergreen Walk) 0000 Evergreen Way Evergreen Walk 6410 Popular Ave.STE 850,27/15 CommercialLifestyleCentersMemphisTN38119 Unit #3 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com.Unit #4 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #5 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com.Unit #6 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #7 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #8 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #9 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #10 (L.A.Fitness) 100 Cedar Ave.Evergreen WalknLLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit 11 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #1 1A 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. Unit #12 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com.Unit #12A 151 Buckland Road Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 27/15 Vacant Com. 1 P:\06404.10\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc Address Unit #13 151 Buckland Road Unit #14 151 Buckland Road Owner Evergreen Walk LLC Evergreen Walk LLC Unit #15 (ECHN Medical Offices) 2800 Tamarack Drive Other Parcels: 105 Buckland Hills Dr. 31 Buckland Hills Dr. 95 Buckland Hills Dr. 1 Buckland Rd. 9 Buckland Rd. 15 Buckland Rd. 70/90 Buckland Rd. 79 Buckland Rd. 95 Buckland Rd. 103 Buckland Rd. 116 Buckland Rd. 130 Buckland Rd. 179 Buckland Rd. 190 Buckland Rd. 206 Buckland Rd. 207 Buckland Rd. 218 Buckland Rd. 235 Buckland Rd. Evergreen Walk Medical Associates LLC c/o The CASLE Corporation Centro Bradley Northern Hills LLC Lowes Home Centers,Inc. Centro Bradley Northern Hills LLC Leonard,Scott Leonard,Scott Leonard,Scott 110 Lavender Lane,Rocky Hill,CT 06067 MS Townline Associates LLC c/o Laurence Rubinow Town of South Windsor Town of South Windsor Town of South Windsor Buckland Road Assoc.LLC Krawski,William Part of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC Reichle,Earl &Barbara Rounseville,Marion &Roy Luu Dinh Hoang,Nguygen Trang Thonh Kochanski,Craig &Lynn. Part of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC Mailing Address 1E different) 555 Main St,Manchester,CT 06040 555 Main St.,Manchester,CT 06040 200 Fisher Drive Avon,CT 06001 c/o Centro Watt 131 Dartmouth St.,Boston,MA 021 16 P.O.Box 1111,No.Wilkesboro,NC 28656 c/o Centro Watt 131 Dartmouth St.,Boston,MA O21 16 110 Lavender St,South Windsor,CT 06074 555 Main St,Manchester CT 06040 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 395 Buckland Rd,South Windsor,CT 06074 555 Main St,Manchester CT 06040 247 Abby Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 2 P:\O6404.1 0\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc Mao/Lot Land Use 27/15 Vacant Com. 27/15 Vacant Com. 27/15 Commercial 18/4 Commercial 18/6 Vacant 1 8/7 Commercial 18/8 Single Family 18/9 Single Family 18/10 Single Family 18/3 Commercial 27/12 Vacant 27/13 Vacant 27/14 Vacant 27/10 4F/SF 27/9 Single Family 27/1 Vacant) 27/8 Vacant 27/3 Single Family 27/2 Single Family 27/4 Single Family 38/11 Single Family) Address Owner Mailing Address $different)Map/Lot Land Use 240 Buckland Rd.Croteau,Arlene C.27/5 Single Family251BucklandRd.Part of Evergreen Walk PUD (Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 38/1 2 Single Family)252 Buckland Rd.Wolf &Guerra,LLC 989 Ellington Rd.,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/1 0 Single FamilyR014/274 Buckl.Rd.Wolf &Guerra,LLC 989 Ellington Rd.,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/9 Vacant 296 Buckland Rd.Messiah Evan.Lutheran Ch.38/8 Single Family 300 Buckland Rd.Messiah Evan.Lutheran Ch.38/7 Commercial326BucklandRd.Schiavone,Steven&Luca,Kawa 44 Highwood.,Simsbury,CT 06070 38/6 Single Family325/335 Buckland Rd.Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave.,CT 06074 38/13 Vacant 350 Buckland Rd.Asticon Investment Ltd.1744 Ellington Rd,S.Windsor,CT 06074 38/5 Vacant395BucklandRd.Woodcok,John J.lll P.O.Box 684,South Windsor,CT 06074 38/1 Commercial419BucklandRd.Carmon &Co.807 Bloomfield Ave.,Windsor,CT 06095 51/34 Commercial 432 Buckland Rd.Benchmark GPT Windsor,LLC 51/33 Commercial 40 Williams St.,Ste.350,Wellesley,MA 02482 435 Buckland Rd.South Windsor Reality CO LLC 51/35 Commercial c/o Peretz Resnick &CO LLP 303 South Broadway Tarrytown NY 10591 5422 469 G Buckland Rd.Buckland Meadow Associates 51/49 Commercial R007 Smith St.DowneastAssoc.,Ltd.Prtnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,lN 46206-6120 18/16 Vacant R002 Smith St.DowneastAssoc.,Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206-6120 17/16 175 Wheeler Rd.KF Properties,LLC 175 Wheeler Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/1 Res/Comm. 188 Wheeler Rd.Kebalo,Walter 188 Wheeler Rd.,South Windsor,Ct 06074 17/2 Single Family 140 Smith Street Jean Marc Jacques 658 Ellington Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074 25/30 Vacant 198 Smith St.French,Margaret 17/3 Single Family 21 6 Smith St.Antosik,Scott &Beverly 17/4 Single Family 236 Smith St.Johnson,Aaron &Karen 17/5 Single Family 250 Smith St.Nation,Craig D.c/o JE Shepard CO, P.O.Box 415,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/6 Single Family 260 Smith St.Evergreen Walk LLC 555 Main St.Manchester CT 06040 17/7 Single Family 274 Smith St.Rozwadowski,Robert &Ewa 17/8 Single Family 291 Smith St.Kilburn,Wayne &Norene 17/15 Single Family 302 Smith St.White,Lorraine 17/9 Single Family 307 Smith St.Pulford,Beth &Robert 17/13 Single Family 314 Smith St.314 Smith St.Assoc.332 Smith St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 17/1 0 Single Family 31 9 Smith St.Gill,Theodore &Betty 17/1 4 Single Family 3 P:\O6404.10\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc Address Owner Mailing Address (E different)Map/Lot Land Use 331 Smith St.Colavecchio,Vincent &Diane 17/12 Single Family 332 Smith St.Hayes,Robert &Beverly 17/11 Single Family340SmithSt.Fraser,Brenda &.&Bruce D.18/1 Single Family345SmithSt.Beaupre,Gene 18/1 7 Single Family357SmithSt.Boutin,Emil &Lucille 18/15 Single Family367SmithSt.Downeast Assoc.Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,lN 46206—6120.18/14 Single Family377SmithSt.DuFour,Willard &Claire 18/13 Single Family383SmithSt.Gancarz,Richard &Irene 18/12 Single Family395SmithSt.Leonard,Scott 110 Lavender Lane,Rocky Hill,CT 06067 18/11 Vacant22WheelerSt.Downeast Assoc.Ltd.Ptnrs.P.O.Box 6120,Indianapolis,IN 46206-6120 17/17 Vacant 5 Drake Ct.Hill,Michael 25/30—31 Residential6DrakeCt.Stryker,Greg 25/30-20 Residential 7 Drake Ct.Chaudhry,Zanib B.25/30-30 Residential 8 Drake Ct.Muddassir,Syed M.25/30—21 Residential 9 Drake Ct.Sobieski,Peter 25/30-29 Residential 10 Drake Ct.Reid,Lennox &Shannon 25/30-22 Residential 11 Drake Ct.Edgecomb,David &Laura 25/30-28 Residential 12 Drake Ct.Case,Wendy O.&Ryan 25/30—23 Residential 14 Drake Ct.Machowski,James &Adrienne 25/30-24 Residential 15 Drake Ct.Roncaioli David J 25/30—27 Residential 16 Drake Ct.Kleczkowski,James &Shannon 25/30-25 Residential 17 Drake Ct.Luczha,Joseph;25/30-26 Residential R003 Deming St.Jamil,Muhammad &Humera 17 Deming St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 50/23 Vacant 17 Deming St.Jamil,Muhammad &Humera 50/19 Single Family 25 Deming St.Cotton,Esther 50/20 Single Family 33 Deming St.Soucy,Lionel &Margaret 50/21 Single Family 43 Deming St.Soucy,Lionel &Margaret 50/22 Single Family 47 Deming St.Kebalo,Andrian &Cheryl 51/44 Single Family 50 Deming St.Molloy,Elizabeth 51/47 Single Family 6O Deming St.DFV Associates LLC 51/46 Single Family 67 Deming St.Gaines,Michelle &Jason 51/43 Single Family 68 Deming St.Freeman,Daniel 51/45 Single Family 75 Deming St.Wisneski,David &Nathalie 51/42 Single Family 76 Deming St.Jones,Robert &Townsend,Phyliss 51/40 Single Family 83 Deming St.Desrocher,James 51/41 Single Family P:\06404.10\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc Address 112 A Deming St. 112 B Deming St. 112 C Deming St. 130 Deming St. 152 Deming St. 240 Deming St. R01 7 Clark St. R01 6 Clark St. R014 Ciark St. 490 Ciark St. 500 Clark St. 61 0 Ciark St. 748 Ciark St. 760 Clark St. Kebaio Ln., Common Land 101 KEBALO LANE 102 KEBALO LANE 103 KEBALO LANE 104 KEBALO LANE 201 KEBALO LANE 202 KEBALO LANE 203 KEBALO LANE 204 KEBALO LANE 301 KEBALO LANE 302 KEBALO LANE 303 KEBALO LANE 304 KEBALO LANE 400 KEBALO LANE 501 KEBALO LANE 503 KEBALO LANE P:\06404.1 O\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc Owner Mailing Address (E different)Map/Lot Land Use Hershcopf,Steven 112 Deming St.,Unit A 51/38-1 Commerciai Gerlt,Wayne PO Box 1132 South Windsor CT 06074 51/38-2 CommerciaiGerlt,Wayne PO Box 1132 South Windsor CT 06074 51/38—3 Grilli,Gary &Jean 435 Buckland Road,S.Windsor,CT 06074 51/37 Commerciai South Windsor Reality CO LLC c/o Peretz Resnick &CO LLP 303 South Broadway Tarrytown NY 10591542251/36 Commerciai Cavalry Church of the Assemblies 400 Buckland Road 38/2 Commercial Waldron,Stanley 859 Clark St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 37/7 Vacant Gray,Freddie 119 Columbia Rd,Windsor,CT 06095 37/3 Vacant Waldron,Stanley 859 Clark St.,South Windsor,CT 06074 37/6 Vacant Szymczyk,Leon &Sophie 37/9 Single Family Hood,Donald 37/10 Single Family Dinse,Merle &Audrey 37/8 Single Family Kaufman,Cynthia &Clark,Patrick 50/28 Single Family Karzar,John &Patricia 50/27 Single Family K F PROPERTIES LLC 175 WHEELER RD,South Windsor,CT 06074 LARSON BURTON L &JOAN D Res.Condo SULLIVAN TIMOTHY P &ELAINE Res.Condo ARCHAMBAULT RONALD A &JEAN A Res.Condo TULEJA DONALD R &ELIZABETH A Res.Condo PINEO DANNE M Res.Condo DELCONTE EMIDIO J Res.Condo HUNT HOLLY K Res.Condo ARCELL CELESTE Res.Condo MOYNIHAN MARGARET M Res.Condo SAMSELL JOHN S &ELAINE Bv Res.Condo GUASTAMACHIO CLARA A Res.Condo ALLISON NANCY Res.Condo WHEELER ESTATES CONDO ASSN INC Res.Condo BRAND NANCY J Res.Condo LIBUDRI RICCARDO &ELISABETTA Res.Condo 601 KEBALO LANE 602 KEBALO LANE 603 KEBALO LANE 604 KEBALO LANE 701 KEBALO LANE 702 KEBALO LANE 703 KEBALO LANE 704 KEBALO LANE 705 KEBALO LANE 706 KEBALO LANE MARSH BRYAN H &SALLY L GRAICERSTEIN RITA DIRRIGL IRENE G BRETON ROBERT A &VINCENZA M HANSON RICHARD W &CAROL A PERRIN JANE F RYAN RICHARD IRREVOCABLE TRUST L/U C/O PATRICK J RYAN TRUSTE SINCLAIR ANN W KING ELIZABETH R EVANS KENNETH E &GAIL G Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo Res.Condo P:\06404.1 0\FLB Zone\AbuttingOwners.doc PLANNING DEPARMENT IN—HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE:7-1 1—07 TO:Matt Galligan,Fred Shaw,Michael Gantick,Rich Bond,Walter Summers,Jeff DoolittleRayFavreau,Karl Reichle,Mark Owens,Steve Lavigueur,Chris Dougan,Bob DeptulaJohnCaldwell,Dennis Sheridan,Ron Asselin FROM:Marcia A.Banach,AICP,Director of Planning The Planning &Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl O7-42P,Evergreen Walk LLC General Plan of Development &Special Exception Location:north of Smith Street,south of Deming Street,west of Buckland Road D Site Plan D Subdivision No.Acres 243 Zone GD D Industrial Commercial %Residential N0.Lots/Units 200 Water:&Public B Private Well Sewerage:g Public D Septic System725,000 sf retail,550,000 sf office,75,000 sf indoor recreation,250ProjectDescription:hotel rooms,200 apartments Future Town-owned property involved?D Yes g No B new street(s)D new detention area D new open space/recreation area D active Epassive Flaming Dept.comments:Update of the existing General Plan of Development &SpecialExceptionrequestfor200apartments Please comment by 7/3 1/07 and return to the Planning Department. FLB Archmecture &P‘annmg,inc.-19 Silver Lame,East Hartford,CT Oél 18 860.568.4030 'fax:860.5685 ‘29 -http://home.att.net/~archflb July 12,2007 CERTIFIED MAIL Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor,CT 06074 Dear Property Owner: Re:Evergreen Walk,Evergreen Walk LLC In accordance with Section 4.2.4 (c)of the “Town of South Windsor Zoning Regulations",we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission.The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments,however,you are not required to attend.You may also submit written comments regarding the application priorto the hearing if you so desire.For further information regarding the specific date this will be heard please contact Marcia Banach,Director of Planning,at 644—251 1. Sincerely, /-/ca “Lg/Iv.aw/f/x/ Alan F.Lamson,AIA FLB Architecture &Planning,lnc. 19 Silver Lane East Hartford,CT 06118 860-568—4030 Name and Address of Sender ‘gCheck type of mai!or service: /9 /"& St ’¢/}/7(’(€+1’” /V<'/AQA € CAL p/Qnn Aqj :7: L Recorded Registered etum Receipt Deiivery for Memhandise (lmernationaD namre ConrmangS‘f Nq rf )Ca/Ql ,C)‘a é/Lf‘ Addresses Name Street and PO Address " 1 o oe Lee/(g o oo 9/?éj_._J,Z,?{ice 7 fr Article Number i,£- é é c A Fleceived at Post Office Z P coverage on international mail Spemal handling charges apply only lo Standard Mail A)and Standard Mail (B)parcel Complete by Typewriter,Ink,or Ball Pomt Pen otal Number of Pieces isted by Sender M P S Form 3877,August 2000 7W5 'w>Slg fitio .....I J V W .3 o ,.t_-€f _ t s TL Number of Pieces dared by Sender 4f..... w Form 3877 August 2000 Complete by Typewriter,Ink,or Ball Point Pen 1 ?’r of coverage on Internanonal man Specral handllng charges apply only to Standard Marl (A)and Standard Mall (B)parcels and Address of Sender ‘Check type of mavl or service lAffix Stamp Here‘(If issued as ag4f</)7(6a51u/C’k //rnn,ygj‘wemfled ?Recorded Delivery(lnternationa|)‘ 3 S,/u c r Aan e ‘[’7 COD Dehvery Confirma‘bn [3 $tgurn istered Receiptfor MerchandiseExpressMailCrSignarureConfirmationE_,“Agree f e weed/xirArtic!e Number ‘Addressee Name Streel and PO Address Postage7‘7",‘r LA“,Dink Moe/Effiw 190 L j’z’j’o coo/?(jf 5 7f w pzo7 @e Mer ,,_§,,Zg.JT, Q?l/_, i /\/q A C ”/h i of I,94g ‘3“c:/‘ ldAgg/gF r4 s7‘Condo. we é 2?ice kzjele A/Q hay rjv 7L f 7 /) /rt/7 z D r W’V /r D M w at;ff JL‘éM «Q A lAffix Stamp Here )(If Issued as a LJ Recorded Dellvery (InternatmnaD u certificate of mailing, Fjggtgllifgeeieipi {or Merchandise icopiesorfor additional of this bill) 3 Signature Confirmation l Posimark and nd Address of Sender lCheck type of mail o:service:a #re/r ¢ca¢urek Q/cmnmg ‘/\Qr%/Cé fc/tCV Article Number aJc/I’eAddresseeNameStreelandPOAddress Postage Fee Chae Retered aLu Ce /~e.§7c fct // AA 1i 7Lf'j a9 A Lb!1_L(i JA §CdCj ,['ffl o?oyx Kubq/JLAA ,_5uLk/f l¢1 b )L/l MI r} m Mc/q}r“Ié?6 €4ASL‘!25%baru ,,IL n ”a Jgaaaaa fé r ”W m W/cJLccrd /Jo/;~5Q ,7 45+/"/r/)V L‘fc/ Lia éJ x7 . 57LC'VcA 5%,mv a )7 K1&5 HQ Al’ifbaasml i ywbla/gLrcl mesxrqh kvcm AMM Churq/ Luo g a!6 “er;Q47L J (°yl //e (799 duo jndélg go![4 ,e43/géclwfz igrzw e srp éé 09 41m ml!H E//ImU, i Handg Aciual Value l :9 iv 6 om/l‘Lgi é fa gel 5&4 kabglLAiWSu) J1 o D?lQen‘FQ ,,Q???%l2p £149,bgrln Ange,,‘ fan a Dr r I i) 4 @JL 7 é 53’(j @L ,7;7i?eaze émLLgaLgm go- Mil/l1 €00 C 9‘/*1 /€1“é mg ]m éL um Indemnity payable lorreconelructionofonnegotiabledocumenlsundarExpressMaildocumenlreconstructioninsuranceIs$500 per piece subjac toformultiplepiecesioslordamagesinasinglecatastrophicoccurrenceThemaximumindemnitypabieonExpressMailmerchandiseinsuranceis$500,but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available ioriup to$5 000 to some but not all countries The maxrmum indemnity payable is $25 000 lor registered mail See Domestic Mail‘ManuaIRQOO S913 and 5921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail See internal/anal MailManualior limitations i lot coverage on international mail SpeCial handling charges apply only to Standard Mail (A)and Standard Mali (B)parcelorm3877,August 2000 Complete by Typewriter,ink,or Ball Paint Pen taiNumberofPieces at Post Office /’ 'o 7 %1 W ,Ei l if gis Ve i L(# l a gkg g) e J J ' kl w dmw ‘ 5 [C __%(fen (g 3 f l‘7 l 'Wm i :Date of Rece/Qt lin —r"__ 2 li h 7 A .e “ f‘ 3+ m ll \ ii s F Stamp Here D Recorded Delivery (lmernational) Addressee Name,Street,and PO Address 2- Check type of mail or service:and Address of Sender &f1fCA/7ZT 0/544 I‘?k jy/Qnh h]c ?S }I l/fr LI“),t}‘[’r: L Return 'tered Receim forMerchandise [:5 Signature Coniirmation1i4%#qmeg/Q/f CToc.m? Anicle Number HS-Ei 7 i ii ¢&2jr*~ L &*M”a ooo/7(J3i A WJI U14 ,emm ifmwégzéw ,C/ Ml /77 Giant/:‘r;NI“i/O 5w c "*‘k/C arc/1 Lf Q éVrJ V60 éwurww g Jag c i Sw g mq gmr¥u~w AWS“I) £b 54o 11:11”(ga _.. Mil/f7 7T4.,7 L r\_/b _ 9a 0/7 r’;9i m r:o \ i i W Wife kriuiww L ‘7‘rt; coverage on /§ 3877,August 2000 Complete by Typewriter,Ink,or Ball Point Pen :r of Pieces ‘7 ”75 [\[y "/ n m 7 _ W1.d, _f‘ f$ V i . k } Lz ,_ 7 7 r‘ ‘\ g,,d : r /6//Z@bn /.6 ,.1 Stamp Here i eturn Receipi 1m Merchandise [J Signature Confirmation Addressee Name Sireet and PO Address i Recorded Delivery (mternational) lj gistered and Address of Sender Afgi %va5zcu‘e V y/q/W’hh 9gi/V€F A/i 0‘57;Hqrfvg/Q/CT 0 cli WHR Fee Fee ét‘i/(Q/‘Q/DA _.l. ,$xild ¢§c7L (Rrj (sn De (kyW-lcr é J LAISLS y l K/zd {w q ”farc /cn Lg Z1J¢,Ccs[fig t/'hJiq?im“07 vn;1e% fad * x fg, Aer/r4 tn wlz}fe: ez L £Ljg’d/Jv )F/ 5a1 gcQ 1?? L C 2a ‘__J_.__ coverae on ternanal m l hand chares al onl to Standard M A)and Standard M (B)parcel Complete by Typewriter,Ink,or Ball Pomt Pen.3 877,August 2000 ‘‘ Re Check type of mail or service: e‘ ‘f‘R f ij ,7 1 //L fi of f2 i m z &§a¢n£:/&J2¢L . i ]V 7 ‘2L @alq i, 7 :z W 7W.wil ?i,£I M j7;#Q“‘J (/l Total Number oi ces‘Pie Reced at Post Offceieiv ‘ g intio ail SpeCIa ling g ppy y ail (ail s @CQWV 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE o SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 TELEPHONE (860)644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 2150 0005 7640 3695 July 19,2007 Town Clerk Town of Manchester 41 Center Street Manchester,CT 06040 Dear Madam/Sir: Re:Notice to Adjoining Municipalities In accordance with Connecticut General Statutes concerning notification to municipalities regardingFlaming&Zoning Commission applications that could affect the abutting town,we hereby notify youoftheapplicationsubmittedbyEvergreenWalk,LLC.(Appl #07-42P) The applicant requests is for General Plan of Development approval to update the General Plan forEvergreenWalktoinclude725,000 square feet of retail;550,000 square feet of office;75,000 squarefeetofindoorrecreation;250 hotel rooms;and Special Exception to Section 4.2.4.c of the zoningregulationsfor200residentialdwellingunits;all located on 243 +/-acres located west of BucklandRoad,south of Deming Street and north of Smith Street,Buckland Gateway Development Zone. This application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the Flaming &Zoning Commission onSeptember11,2007 at 7:30 p.m.in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall. If you have any question,please feel free to contact the Flaming Department at 644-251 l,ext.253. Very truly yours, Michele R.Lipe,AICP {E4.7 v7 1 Assistant Director of Flaming MRL/ma 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE -SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 TELEPHONE (860)644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7004 2510 0003 9802 9974 August 29,2007 Alan F.Lamson FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc. 19 Silver Lane East Hartford CT Dear Mr.Lamson: Re:Appl #07-42P-Evergreen Walk LLC -request for General Plan of Development approval to update the General Plan for Evergreen Walk to include 725,000 square feet ofretail;550,000 square feet of office;75,000 square feet of indoor recreation;250 hotel rooms;and Special Exception to Section 4.2.4.0 of the zoning regulations for 200 residential dwelling units;all located on 243 +/-acres located west of Buckland Road,south of Deming Street and north of Smith Street,Buckland Gateway Development Zone. Please be advised that the Public Hearing of the Planning &Zoning Commission in the above referenced matter has been scheduled for Tuesday,September ll,2007 at 7:30 in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall,1540 Sullivan Avenue.Someone must be present at the hearing to represent the application. One signs advertising the hearing must be posted on the property for ten (10)consecutive days prior to the hearing and must be clearly visible from a town street.Please have one sign posted on 151 Buckland Road by August 3 l ,2007. Signs can be obtained in the Planning Department. Sincerely, /‘.y 2&4/JZ/Qéggjc/CI,g 9 Maria D.Acevedo Administrative Secretary Appl #07-42P,Evergreen Walk General Plan 0f Development Update and Special Exception to Section 4.2.4.c Public Hearing 9-11-2007 Planning Department Report 1 Request for approval of an updated General Plan of Development for theremainderofthe232acresonthewests1deofBucklandRoadBuckland Gateway zone 1n accordance w1th the prov131ons of Seetlon 8 l 2 The or1g1na1EvergreenWalkGeneralPlanwasapproved1n2001andmuchconstructlonhasoccurredundertheor1g1nalGeneralPlanTheupdatedGeneralPlanshowsex1st1ngandapprovedbulldlngsaswellasconceptsforfutureconstructionf/t >)/?The major dlfferences between the proposed General Plan update and the prev10usly approved General Plan 1nclude o }hcrease 1n retall from 375 000 sq it to 725 000 sq ft crease 1n office space from 650 000 sq ft to 550 000 sq ft o ‘Addltlon of 200 resrdentlal dwelling unlts ‘ o The updated plan shows full burld out of the entlre s1te the orlglnal GeneralPlanhadundesrgnatedareasshownas“Other land of Evergreen WalkLLCa) ‘»o Hotel rooms stay the same at 250,but in two,4-story buildings rather thanone,6-story building;and w}o Parking “decks”have been added to create 2 level parking 3.T n ert appllcant new ls sectlon also requestlng 4 2 5 c of a/Specral the Buckland Exceptlon Gateway for zone 200 ho 17%: mg Comm1ss10n units may pr ve the/speCIaI exception for multifamlly use 1f 1t determlnes that thefollowmgcr1ter1aaremet hq proposal 1s cons1stent w1th the goals and obj ectlves of the Plan oforiservatlonandDevelopment o The appl1cat1on has met the requirements of the zoning regulations. o The land is physically suited to the proposed use. o Mt nlmall 1f any,adverse env1r0nmental Impacts are created o NO traffic 0r other hazards w111 be created o The Impacts on the capac1ty of the present and proposed ut111t1es streetdramagesystemsSldewalksandotherelementsofthe1nfrastructure W111 beMnlmal o There W111 be minimal or noadverse effects on existing uses in the'area. o The character of the nelghborhood W111 be malntalned or mlnimally disrtfpted o The general Welfare of the community will be seirhed o ZFhere is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community needs O storic factors are adequately protected or due conSIderatlon toreservatlonofhistorlcfactorshasbeendemonstrated 0 The overall phy51cal appearance of the proposed development is compatlble :Mth surrounding development and the Comm1ss1on s goals for thenefghborhood/corrldor o The archltectural deSIgn is aesthetlcally pleasmg and blends well into thesurroundingarea o The location of the multl famlly resrdentlal use 1s fully integrated w1th othercommercralretailofficeand/or recreatlonal uses The proposed multl famlly re81dent1al use shall be appropriately bufferedfromadjacentres1dent1aluses The multi famlly reSIdentlal use has been de31gned to meet the legalrequirementsforthedisabledand o Whether the Slte elther 1s or W111 be w1th1n reasonable pedestrian prox1m1tytoishopplng,servrces and institutions as are routinely required by the futurer631dentsoftheSite .ctidn 4 2 15 prOVIdes spec1f1c requirements for multifamily development Theiss10nhastheabilitytolimitanyphasetol10orlessreSidentialunits .An approved General Plan is valid for up to five years.Prior to any actualbuildingorsiteconstruction,a full site plan of development that is in conformance with the approved general plan must be submitted and approvedbytheCommission.Each site plan will include all of the engineering details aswellasfinalbuildingdesignandsitelayout. 6/There is a substantial amount of traffic associated with any development of thismagnitude.The traffic report indicates that about 1,000 additional weekday p.m.peak hour and Saturday peak hour trips will be generated on BucklandRoadbythedevelopmentasproposedThisquantityisapprox1matelydoubletheprOJectedbackgroundpeakhourtraffic1ftheremamderofEvergreenWalk1snotbulltout.J.// i 4’\/}ff '‘/:7 V d .x7StateTrafficComm1ss1onapproval1srequiredandanapplicationhasbeen’ submitted STC customarlly lssues its final recommendatlons and permlt afterapprovalfromPZChasbeenobtained / stri access has been prov1ded throughout the Site As 1nd1v1dual Slten_e prepared we w1ll strengthen pedestrlan interconnections as neededT:completion of Tamarack Avenue Will create a trans1t corridor that Willaccommodatebuses 9}Maximum impervious coverage allowed is 60%,with a minor bonus forconsolidatedparcels.There is a requirement in the Gateway zone that areareservedforopenspaceandsetasidetomeetimperviouscoveragerequirementsshallbedistributedthroughoutthesiteinsuchamannerthatthelandisvisiblefrompublicstreetsand/or useable (for example for pedestrian Circulationoutdoorentertainmentandculturaleventsbandshellorarts/crafts shows)TheCommissmnshouldreViewtheproposaltomakesurethatyouarecomfortablew1ththeopenspacedistribution x l0)All of the retail buildings without residences are proposed to be one or twostories;retail-buildings with—residences are-proposedare 2-4 stories.The officebuildingsvaryfromtwot0fourstories,and the 2 hotels are proposed to have 4stories ll Required parking is apprOXimately 4200 spaces With 4200 to be prov1dedSomeoftheparkingisproposedtobedeckparkingOff-street parking must bedistributedaroundbuildings 1%A 75 foot buffer is required along res1dential zone boundaries and has beenshownonthedeVelopmentplan 13 There are regulated wetlands on the Site IWA/CC has no process by which toaddressageneralplansoIWA/CC approval is required at the Site plan stage. \ s r h lyPublic uwaterand sewer are a‘vaii‘aby As of this date,the design of the publicflreprotectionwatermainhasnotbeenresolvedtotheFireMarshal’ssatisfaction.Fire Marshal approval of the water main size and routing needs tooccurpriortoactionbythisCommissionsothatwecanbecertainthatfire /\protection is fully adequate. 161f this General Plan is approved,Planning Dept.requests that the parking table K ix“:be incorporated into the General Plan. SEP ’zuuz SOUTHWWDSORMNMMEJJ’ at Buckland Hills SOuth WindsonConnecticut K“»0‘1 ‘x \IN f\0(UV?!“¥. /a 1m x vmuuymvnm‘e‘»l Hm [<9 1x w-umsrkvux ”N H M»MM“\‘rvgmalk k V'Ai‘n"! R i I ;\\“MKA ‘MA I‘i‘ll H,<\‘\c k‘launcr'Awhamu hMYxc linumccr ‘mm \(H'I \A m wl Fimnm; If»S:\\i‘§(M‘Hh PLAN 1m:Ii:nf:::d;\l’i 1mm NKARY U l.\"\I 10).dwpc Aghnm <ml and uuwmnmmu;Lngmm‘AI’INh D}MU x «'(m i (rm V3 I \\($V(‘\m\u}ht ",\l!~,zw’d H mwu I mm EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 08/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Shde No.1 Ir..1’m EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Deveiopmem Slide No.2 . Sa w : :8 mé m o : OE m .o z wg a Ew E u 2 w > w o Ho :m E .m h w c m w v_ . _ < > > zm m m w m m > m PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development FZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide N0.5 PZC Hearing 09/11/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide No.6 EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/11/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.7 , EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/11/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.8 m ,oz mg m E9 5 2 9 2 “ . $0 cm E .m L m c m O vj < > > 2m m m w m m > m Ba : :8 95 $ : oE EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 112007 General Plan of Development Slide No‘‘10 PARKING TABLE USE TYPE BUILD!NG AREA INDEX NEW REQUIHED APPROVED RETAIL EXlsnNG 375.000 SF 1 .996 PROPOSED 350,000 SF 4.0/1 .000 1 .400 OFFICE EXISTING 43,690 SF 192 UNDER CONST.58,800 SF 294 PROPOSED 506,310 SF 4.0/1 .000 2,026 RECREATION EXIsnNG 45,000 SF 31o PROPGSED 30.000 SF 4.0/1 .000 120 HOTEL PROPOSED 250 ROOMS 1.0/ROOM 250 RESI DENTIAL PROPOSED 200 UNITS 1.75/UNH'350 TOTAL 4,146 SPACES 2,792 SPACES TOTAL NEW PROPOSED PARKING 4,1 65 SPACES EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearmg 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Developmem Slide No.11 EVERGREEN WALK FZC Hearing 0911 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.12 PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide No.13 PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide No.14 PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERG REEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide N0.15 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Shde No.16PZCHearing09111/2007 PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK Genera!Plan of Development Shde No‘17 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide N0.18PZCHearing09111/2007 ~w1~y EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Devempment, EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide Na.20 EVERGREEN WALK EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.22 Shde No 23 17/260 PZC Heanng 091/ §giw §§§%§§%u«%% 9 I j‘ g: n. , ‘Z QE§w EM§£ l w 7 Wm.m %b "W ‘NAM m— tr?$ 4‘’ 7"?w—J m u‘ . )I ; NF? 'raw M EVERGREEN WALK at Buckland Hills ww itifyww I'EH§:;:Y;0»Wm ”MW Apphum1‘mgmuxNagy! 1r:;:'‘i’t‘€w:x;g w s {\(mwf’xmms):f‘?2x-;m.,,Mmm»;mK Shcus 1~i Al)! m\urgu u PL;\\ A .H :m‘~L vm (,V x I 7 )"II.§J\H\/‘.RY Ll f:VA“03 {,_.y)(anc;.x A hum ms, m y‘.makm i mummy hu- El mx mwmcw Mandm‘!"( n m T x '€,‘1 t L1 3m \\!‘l A\‘Ma N I 1 3 ()I‘!\AAM‘tk I‘I.,\\\\x é md km;Humwmwuc my:w mm“)‘\, 1wW umfEHrQx mt “mm b Wax-Lan um»;*1 “My. 7rd PH \S \U N '\N (‘ na;7A I \\'1\(i PLAN (,4,“(A Pl ;\\ numu EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slme No.25 m 1 ;N , , mN .o z mg m Em E n Q m > w Q he :m E .m L w c m o vj < > > zm m m m v m m > m SO N : :m o 9& 3 : 0N “ . PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development $Iide No.27 wN .o z wu _ _ m vj < > > zm m m O m m > m Ew E n o _ m > m a E :m E _S m c m 0 Bo w : :m o 95 m m : uN a na m u w d gu s u g a u mg : aé w n i u x .m w ‘ . iE h u u Em m a . .5 3 : .E . g= § n u u s .3 3 . . . .= \ E . du b s : .2 . :5 : ma i n : .G . EVERGREEN WALK Genera!Plan of DevelopmentPZCHearing09/1 1/2007 Slide Noe 29 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development ewel' TABLE 3 Typical Land Use Description Size(S.F.)Unit Flow (1) (Gal/Day) Average Daily How (Gal) Office 550,000 0.1 1 /S.F.60,500 Hotel 250 rooms 150/rm 37,500 Indoor Recreation 75,000 0.1 5 /S.F.11,250 Retail 7250000 O.1 0 /S.F.72,500 Residential 200 units/300 rooms 150/rm 45,000 (”All units of flow were estimated from data generated by Fuss &O'Neill for similar types 0f establishments/uses.(”Including restaurants Slide No‘ 31 Plan foDitpmeneveo Glenera 109/120071 PZC Hiearng PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK Genera]Plan of Development Slide Nu‘32 mm dz mg m 88 : :8 95 3 x OE Em E n o E > w Q ho :m E _E w : m 0 v_ . _ < > > zm m m Om m > m EVERGREEN WALK HSde NO. 34 EVERGREEN WALK Genera]Plan of Development Water Supply TABLE 2 Peak Daily Peak Hourly Land Use Unit Flow Average Daily Flow“)Flowa) Description Size (SF)(Gal/Day)Flow (Gal)(Gal)(Gal/Min) Ofece 550,000 0.11/S.F.60,500 121,000 242,000 Hotel 250 Rxns 150/Rm 37,500 75,000 150,000 Indoor Recreation 75,000 0.15/S.F.11,250 22,500 45,000 Retail 725,000 0.10/S.F.72,500 145,000 290,000 Residential 200 Units/300 ISO/Rrn 45,000 90,000 180,000 rooms (1)Peak daily Elow is 2.0 times the demand for an average day, (2)The peak hour demand is 2.0 times the peak daily rate. EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.36 EVERGREEN WALK $i?:Heanng 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide Nu,37 Ring Road Cross-section Not m Soul: EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of DevelopmentPZCHearing08/11/2007 Slide No.33 ‘.Evygqm tv¢z9 ecrun géyacmu ,wkmj 3mg .-5kwb 9 /—~7H;Ml:"v/5’3W5 .%,ugy1g~u tmumnuwmdw“M.Mi .Qma‘ p mm?(«aQwuwbMkk ‘-_-—r way),rcpt“i Jug warv‘m‘w / agm'l.h.A wungnMa” ,v'cwbuw Mlrunvu,‘” ezxxicwzw W .’rhhmmw;yi-«wu‘ anmakycoupmypavcv‘é g Anm/al;“*4? 5kruba “in. Grsaec;(+grf wfiuamzia 6M“Tna :m‘) .6kwbs / /4-$mMmh ‘Emasadwam,iagd" .«v‘nu59mm a3:z.mplc;u¢nimMymw ”3“”.w'nrw,‘P"Pn¢-a bmmangs aa $Pv’ng'f‘AL.‘9 uyc \gqa t Typical Round—about Treatment Mk r—zw v r. EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Sllde No.39 w . h \ FZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 EVERGREEN WALK General Plan of Development Slide No.40 PZC Hearmg 09/11/2007 General Plan of Development Shae No.41 EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide Nu,42 Node Intersewon Tabie 5 Level of Service Summary Synchro Analysis 2010 Background 2010 Combined Tfafflc Tla0ic LOS delay $LOS delay VIC PZC Hearing 09/11/2007 EVERGREEN WALK Generai Pian of Development Slide N04 43 2010 Combined Traffic wl improvmeMS Los delay g 24 Buck‘and Street@ PMPeak D 357 1‘00 D 46.6 0.99 C 34.2 0.87 L84 EBRamps SATPeak D 417 0‘95 E 56.8 1.02 D 37.1 0.90 21 Buckiand Street@ PMPeak A 7.8 0.65 A 8.4 0.72 A 9.8 0.72 I-BA HOVRamps SATPeak A 6.3 0.72 A 68 0.68 A 5.9 0.68 17 Buckland Street©PMPeak B 15.7 0.80 C 21.2 0.80 C 22.5 0.81 PaVIlions Dnve SATPeak C 20.7 0.01 C 0.85 C 21.2 0.85 4 Buckland Street@ PMPeak C 265 0,86 C 335 0.92 C 335 0.92 PleasantVaIIeyRuad SATPeak D 37.6 0.93 D 53.7 1.05 D 53.7 1.05 5 PleasantVaIleyRuad@ PM Peak C 244 093 C 232 0.92 C 23.2 0.92 1-84 Ramps SATPeak C 22.2 0.92 C 22.6 0.93 C 22.5 0.93 6 BucklandRoad@ PM Peak B 12.2 0.85 D 421 0.99 D 37.9 0.99 Ta marack Drive SATPeak C 203 0,87 E 81.3 1.12 D 46,9 0.98 7 Buck1andRoad@ PM Peak A 5.7 0.70 B 18.1 0.73 B 19.1 0.73 HemlockDrive SATPeak B 10.1 0.75 C 28.5 0.99 C 25.8 0.95 8 Buck1andRDad@ PMPeak A 8.9 0.82 C 21.1 0.94 C 204 0.95 CedarAvenue SATPeak A 6.3 0.73 B 11.9 0.85 B 15.4 0.85 9 BuckIandRoad@ PMPeak B 15.3 0.88 B 14.7 0.90 B 15.0 0.91 Deming Skreet SATPeak B 15.4 0.88 B 16.3 0.87 B 13.5 0.87 10 Deming Stree1@ PM Peak Site Drive WBIe0 A 7.6 A 80 A 8.0 NBIeft B 12,5 C 15.0 C 15.0 NBrighk B 100 B 108 B 108 SAT Peak WBief‘t A 77 A 7.8 A 7.8 NBleft B 111 B 12.1 8 121 NB light A 95 A 96 A 9.6 12 Buckiand Road@ PMPeak A 6.0 0.51 A 6.0 0.51 A 7.4 0.48 ' Town Center Drive SATPeak A 7.2 0,52 A 6.1 0.52 A 5.8 0.52 33 Buckland Road@ PM Peak C 25.0 077 C 0.94 C 311 0.94 Rt,30&Rt 194 SATPeak B 19.1 0.62 C 0.73 C 21.1 0.73 EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing OQ/11/2007 General Plan of Development Shde No.44 BUCKLAND RD./TAMARACK AVE. EVERGREEN WALK PZC Haaring 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Shde No‘45 EVERGREEN WALK PZC Hearing 09/1 1/2007 General Plan of Development Slide No.46 Hesketh LIEH Dear Ms.Banach: At the Public hearing on September 11,2007,there was some discussion of the possibleadditionofapedestrianphasetothesignaloperationattheintersectionofTamarack Drive &Buckland Road. We are writing to clarify our recommendation regarding this issue. The analysrs of the intersection that was conducted by our office and is currently under reviewbyJimBubaris,the Town’s consultant shows that the operation of the intersection will beimpactedtoasmaiidogreewhenthepedestrianphaseiscalled,This is typical,and in fact,itwascorrectlynotedatthehearingthattheimpactwaslessthanwewouldhaveothenNise expected.Nonetheless,several movements at this intersection will drop to LOS E or Fwheneverthebuttonsareactuated.Assuming that pedestrian traffic remains light for theforeseeablefuture,this should not present a substantial problem. We propose to include the pedestrian phase at this location assuming that it is agreed to by Town staff,your consultant,the Town Legal Traffic Authority and the Planning &Zoning Commission that the pedestrian phase is recommended.Please be aware,however,that thesignaloperationissubjecttoapprovalbytheStateTrafficCommission,as well. We hope that this will clarify our intent to provide this pedestrian phase for the Town. Very truly yours, F.A.ket &s iates nc F.Mitchell,P.E. Manag rof Transportation Engineering John Finguerra Alan Lamson Laurie Rubinow T:\00167\May 2007exp\mban91 47.doc Civil &Traffic Engineers -Surveyors 'Planners ‘Landscape Architects Tel 860.653.8000 -Fax 860.844.8600 -email mail@fahesketh.com 6 Creamery Brook -East Granby,CT 06026 F.A.HeskethRECENEDSIAssociates,Inc. September 14,2007 E L L‘ Marcia A.Banach,AICP isomHMNusoRPLANMNGDEPLDirectorofP!anning Town of Souih Windsor 1540 Suliivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 RE:Evergreen Walk Proposed General Plan of Development Our File:001 67 , $2 . n5 ? w WN U V W d $F J M W M QC RE C E I V w $0 U I H W I N D S O R P L A N N M Q Q E E I SE P :2(@ L Z W Typical Cross-walk Area Plantinqs (Note:Height of plants will not exceed 18") Botanical Name Common Name Shrubs: Arctostaphyios uva-ursi Bearberry Buxus x microphylla Little—Ieaf Boxwood Ornamenta!Grasses: Festuca glauca Blue fescue Helictotn'chon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass Pennisetum alopecuroides ‘Little Bunny'‘Little Bunny’Fountain Grass Perennials: Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’‘Moonbeam’Coreopsis Hemerocallis ‘Stella D'oro'‘Stella D'oro’Daylily Narcissus spp.Daffodils Salvia ‘May Night’‘May Night’Salvia Veronica austriaca ‘Georgia Blue’‘Georgia Blue'Veronica RECEIVED SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT FLB Architectute &Planning,Inc.19 Silver Lane East Hamord GT 06118 (860)568-4030 tax:(860)568-5129 e-mail:flb@1lbarch.com web:www.1lharch.com TO:Walter Somers,Fire Marshal Town of South Windsor FROM:Alan F.Lamson,AIA,AICP Mark A.Gendron,PE Acorn Engineering Consultanis DATE:September 19,2007 RE:Evergreen Walk —General Plan of Development Project No.99508.00 In response to a request for further information regarding the adequacy of the water systemtoaccommodatetheproposeddevelopmentasshownontheGeneralPlanofDevelopmentforEvergreenWalkassubmittedtothePlanningandZoningCommissionforapproval,weofferthefollowing. It is our understanding that a further engineering study of the water system as existing and proposed in the area is being completed.This memo is intended to address the issueregardingthecoderequirementsforfireprotectionatanyoftheproposedbuildings.Forreference,the size of piping has little to do with the pressure in the water system.Ratherthatisafunctionoftheelevationofanysite(or any portion of a building on a site)and withsystemlossesinthepipingitself. The types of buildings proposed within the General Plan of Development will,in alllikelihood,be classified as light or ordinary hazard in accordance with NFPA-13.Themaximumdemandforasprinklersysteminanyofthebuildingsisestimatednottoexceed500gpm(gallons per minute)at 6O psi.This estimate includes outside hose streams andtakesintoconsiderationthatthesystemwillbeawetpipesystem. We have also estimated the system demand for a standpipe system in the buildings.Forclarification,none of the buildings proposed wili be classified as high rise (per NFPA-145.4.1.1)or more than 75 feet in height from the lowest level of fire department vehicleaccesstothefloorlevelofthehigheststory.Any building not so classified is required tohaveeitheramanual,automatic,or semi-automatic standpipe system.Section 905 of theConnecticutStateBuildingCoderequiresthatanybuildingover30feetinheight(measuredfromthelowestleveloffiredepartmentvehicleaccesstothefloorlevelofthehigheststory),but not more than 75 feet in height,provide a Class lll standpipe system.Since all buildingswillalsohaveafiresprinklersystem,Exceptioni of Section 905.3.1 applies and Class l stand pipes are permitted.NFPA-14,5.2.5.1 for manual wetvpipe standpipe systems statesthatthesystemneedswaterfromafiredepartmentpumper(or similar)to be pumped intothesysteminordertosupplythesystemdemand. Further,the demand of the first standpipe in any building per NFPA—14 Section 7 10 is 500gpm.Each additional standpipe requires 250 gpm with a maximum,total demand for asprinkleredbuildingof1,000 gpm.Again,demands should be met by the fire departmentapparatus. There is nothing in the above requirements that precludes the size and height of buildingsproposedintheGeneralPlanofDevelopmentandtheengineeringstudyoftheoverallwatersystembyFuss&O’Neill indicates that the fire flows and pressures necessary tomeetthesedesignrequirementsareorwillbeavailable. Currently,we are proposing to leave the 8-inch water mains already installed or alreadyapprovedbySitePlanApprovalsastheyare.The future connection along TamarackAvenueisproposedtobea12-inch main and all connections between Buckland Road andtheexisting8-inch mains on Cedar Avenue and Hemlock Avenue will be 8-inch to the 12-inch main in Tamarack Avenue.Projected fire flows (see the system engineering studymaterial)are well in excess of 1,000 gpm. Alan F.Lamson,AIA Mark A.Gendron,PEFLBArchitecture&Planning,Inc.Acorn Engineering Consultants Encl. c:file Planning &Zoning Commission Evergreen Walk LLC F:\_FLB PROJECTS\FINGUER\99508.00\Genera|Plan 2007\WSO70919Doc RECEIVED cm ;rm}; SOUTH WINDSOR PLANMNG DEPT‘ Q:FLB Architecture &Planning Inc 19 Silver Lane East Hartford CT 06118WE§(360)568-4030 tax (860)560 ’5129 e-mau tlb@nharch com web wwwtlbarcn com TO:Marcia Banach,Town Planner Town of South Windsor FROM:Alan F.Lamson,AIA,AICP DATE:September 20,2007 RE:Evergreen Walk General Plan of Development Project No.99508.00 In response to an inquiry from the Planning and Zoning Commission,we have reviewed the steps necessary for the completion of Tamarack Avenue between the existing segments at the north and south end of Evergreen Walk as well as the completion of Cedar Avenue and Hemlock Avenue from their current terminus to the completed Tamarack Avenue This involves the construction of approximately 4,000 lineal feet of roadway including four roundabouts and road cross-sections with and without medians Our preliminary estimate is that the cost of completing the major roads (Tamarack Avenue, Cedar Avenue,and Hemlock Avenue)would be approximately $600 per lineal foot. Additionally,the location of the roadways,depicted on the General Plan Development,is based on our estimates of developable areas and building sizes and configurations that will change as each parcel is designed and developed.This has certainly been shown to be true with a comparison of the original General Plan of Development and the mal design for the buildings that have been constructed to date.Obviously,this is a significant expense that is impossible to finance solely on the development of any one specific section of the property. Our anticipated plan is to make the final construction of the main roads shown on the General Plan of Development coincident with the development of the adjoining sites in a manner that allows as much flexibility in final site design as possible and in a manner which is economically achievable. The attached copy of the proposed General Plan of Development was been annotated to identify potential development areas and sections of Tamarack Avenue to allow us to formulate a description of how we envision completion of the road network. Area 1 and Area 2 are served by the segment of Tamarack Avenue between the existing south terminus of Tamarack Avenue and the end of the extended Hemlock Avenue (SectionA).We would anticipate completion of this entire segment when the final development planforArea1ispresentedforapproval.We feel that two access points to this portion of the site and the amount of the road that fronts on this portion of the site make the completion of this segment feasible.Conversely,whether Area 2 is submitted as fully developed,or is done in stages,and the final amount of office space proposed will impact how much of Section A will be constructed.We will review these office buildings and the road segments with the Town staff and the Commission as we approach each final site plan. Area 3 is served by the segment of Tamarack Avenue between Hemlock Avenue and Cedar Avenue and the extension of both of those side avenues (Section B).Assuming that all of Area 3 west of Tamarack Avenue is submitted for approval of nnal site plan and based on the type and amount of proposed building construction,we would review this development with the Town staff and the Commission to determine whether completion of this Section is necessary and feasible. The completion of the final location of the north end of Evergreen Way is,as has been previously agreed to,dependent upon an expansion of LA Fitness,If that expansion is proposed and approved,then the final intersection of Evergreen Way with Cedar Avenue will be known and the secondary roadway of Evergreen Way extension to the north to Area 6 can be nnalized.In any event,the five year period for finalization of the location and construction of Evergreen Way expires on September 30,2009 per the approval letter for the LA Fitness site plan. The completion of Area 7 will be served primarily by the current Cedar Avenue and the extension of Evergreen Way.No extension of Tamarack Avenue is required for that area. The completion of Area 6 will require the extension of Evergreen Way to the north and then to the west connecting with Tamarack Avenue at its approved terminus at the southwest corner of the ECHN 2 approved final site plan.This will provide the two access points for the site contemplated by the proposed General Plan of Development. The development of Area 4 is planned for more than 100,000 SF of ofhce use.lf the final development plan includes office use of approximately this magnitude,then we would anticipate completion of Tamarack Avenue south to Cedar Avenue and the completion of Cedar Avenue to Tamarack Avenue (Section C).A final development plan for the large office use will also define the final location of Tamarack Avenue in this area and any further development would have to conform to this alignment of roadway.A final development planforthehotels(Area 5)would have to be evaluated.If the southern hotel location is developed this could possibly be adequately served by the extension of Cedar Avenue only. However,development of both hotels will require either the full extension of Evergreen Way or the final construction of Tamarack Avenue and Cedar Avenue (Section C). I am sure that you realize that the construction of the avenues in the General Plan of Development is a significant expense.Great care needs to be exercised in each situation where premature and unnecessary construction of the avenues will jeopardize any site development because of an overly burdensome responsibility for roadway construction, where such premature roadway construction results in subsequent removal and reconstruction of portions of the avenues,or the creation of remaining buildable areas that cannot be responsive to future development proposals, Enci.Tamarack Avenue —Phasing Plan dated 9/20/07 c:fiie F:\FLB PROJECTS\FINGUER\99508.00\Genelal Plan 2007\MBD70920TamaraokDoc Jay J.Giles,P.E. Land Development Consultant 65 Doane Street Manchester,CT 06040 September 19,2007 Mr.Walter Summers Fire Marshal Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 RE:Evergecn Walk —Water Supply Dear Mr.Summers: In response to your concems about the proposed size of the water main proposed forinstallationinTamarackAvenue,I have studied the water system,both existing and proposed,and offer the following information. The Connecticut Water Company (CWC)system that serves Evergreen Walk is fedh‘om one 12-inch main in Deming Street.It feeds the 12—inch main in BucklandRoad,which then provides water to several branch connections into Evergreen Walk.No supply comes hom the west so that makes my task of predicting fire flows mucheasier.All tire flows currently enter the Evergeen Walk system nom the BucklandRoad12—inch main or the 8-inch main off Deming on Tamarack Avenue near theECHNMedicalBuilding. A hre flow test was conducted by the CWC on 10/23/06 near the Old Navy (at aboutelev.128)store on Evergreen Way.I believe you were present.It was reported to methatthehydranttestedproduced1,135 gallons per minute (gpm)at a residual pressure of 70 psi.The static pressure before the test was 9O psi.Please refer to theattachedsketchlabeledFireFlowTestatOldNavybyCWC.I’m sure you werehappytoseesuchgreatresults.A similar test on 7/13/98 at a hydrant on BucklandRoad(at about elev.162),near Bldg.800A of The Shops at Evergreen Walk,yielded1,400 gpm at a residual of 50 psi (the static was about 72 psi).This latter test,although 9 years old,produced very similar results in that it produced a flow inexcessof1,000 gpm while loosing only 22 psi ofpressure. Please look at the attached sketch labeled No Connecting Water Main inTamarack.On that sketch you will note that 500 gpm fire flow could be supplied toafuturehotelattheintersectionofCedarwithTamarackataresidualpressureof83 psi without any connection to the existing and proposed 8—inch water main in thenorthernsectionofTamarack.We intend to make that connection in the future but Jay J.Giles,P.E. Land Development Consultant 65 Doane Street Manchester,CT 06040 wanted to show that it is not necessary to provide an adequate f1re flow and it doesnotneedtobea12-inch main.Please also note that a fire flow of approximately2,300 gpm could be provided to that same hotel at a residual pressure of 20 psi.Yourfirepumpingequipmentcouldthereforepumpinexcessof2,000 gpm without goingbelowtherecommendedlowerpressurelimitintheCWCsystem. I also calculated the fire flow to the above hotel with an 8-inch water mainconnectioninTamarackfromtheendoftheapproved8-inch water main about to beconstructedtotheintersectionofTamarackandCedar.Please refer to the attachedsketchlabeledAll8”in Tamarack to Cedar.Such a connection is beneiicial butonlyimprovedtheresidualpressureby2psihorn83to85.It is more beneficial inthemuchhigherfireflows.For example,if your fire department were to draw the pressure down to the 20 psi limit,they could potentially get 3,125 gpm with such aconnectioninplace.In a word,these flows and pressures are “fantastic”. As you will note on the sketch labeled 8"and 12"in Tamarack to Cedar a 12-inchmaindoesnotimprovetheresidualpressureanymorethanthe8-inch did.The 500 gpm flow still has a residual pressure of 85 psi. In conclusion,lam satisfied that an 8-inch main in Tamarack from Deming to CedarwillmorethanadequatelyservethenorthernportionofEvergreenWalk.South ofCedar,a 12—inch main may be required in Tamarack but hirther study is necessary.IunderstandthattheCWChasofferedtocomputermodeltheentireEvergreenWalksystemandwewillworkwiththemtoprovideasmuchinformationaspossible.Ifthatmodelrequiressucha12-inch main south of Cedar,it will be shown on futureFinalDevelopmentPlansforapprovalbyboththeTownofSouthWindsorandtheConnecticutWaterCompany. Sincerely, Jay J.Giles,P.E. Land Development Consultant for Evergreen Walk,LLC Attachments: 8 ///4ND k?l///U /{~:}""’7f;/‘j/3}1%,.‘1 7 (D wy< Cuyewm~CbvNsrcrmax/¢Wa 57:/ WWDWE EA!» BY 7aJJaA U I I h —’-{‘3230*:,A aRf,~:<§ a 5'50 Jpm (awn/'9’; 13 gm og’y’g-”cw”? a :'(I/l"fem i L)x 9Z4I e‘ 2':gig! 8m EXI57~4 ”éI awwe.9/3/a7 55E qym (:93 ;59,5i (paglcQMJ?“‘5 EAN CUYWTL'(Maavma/#z W SHE %DYE BY wwo U; 5T6 5i/3/o7 NO CoMuiN/Ms Aw MAr/V w gmwmewj? #amq 42$ \o 7ZH&I> 50 g bl? $2/mb x/75o’ ?/'—4-qzsg $IM GL§$Mfzi -.Oygvéwgpg é7f59: /5'5’”/55%7§o ‘8?//0073 m 8 EP P49“)3.35MaD "LIBZL/p ip’mwWGT69/3 07 ‘ QPC,FLOW W37 Ar @(D‘ Mww Isa cw. .«tw I“ F&E> wa£xanw ”‘ m”“m w: €mél,‘f::J Z,(.oo’72+— IaUU 3" Ct m&Nzw#au 0§MGDA~I?._ ozg/Wa : fiéa$:o.={4’assI‘7 3" fi‘ 1 35d gw/2.6.3’ v/ H35“ jpmC/camp) Z3 '4’;m .._ :32;93/437 REV.9/17/07 234’ /&$n’)(/,35zJ / ;3/.73 / t /3‘74'p5£.v /C>/ZJ%/29é amt,Q55 =mst.‘ .ZASEV‘W 5331“(pfskzlw) "?:é:fwam -éZO%8// ‘4 A : J~ <$x A Shift Toward Service Jobs By MICHAEL REGAN Courant Staff Writer September 23,2007 Hammad lg Gwwing Fmm ZUDQ thraugh 261:6.Eerv'ice cccunatians axeunted fair Heart;hatfaf the fetal grwnh in Cmnecticut‘elaburface.Balcw.a camtzxan'gon of the gwwth of variaus wowpatic-na 3§m% 22.2% 155% Farming.Pmduetim.fighing‘transrftation frregtry —Lm§Em on.minimum M839Sabsi Manaumnt, pmfia‘swml m s .n 14J}% inside mneactiicut -, Wetkers in service occupation;have l0wer median imamEE than workeFS in aw ether greun in ihe state. “my YwWJalm-e mmpamd Ti)Uther Kate's Median inmme far fuii-tin’e.year-round 5erviee werkera in Cmrectieut i5 the highest in ti‘e natien;the giate ia in the tea lD fer siiworkerii FULL-TINIE SERVICE WQRKERS ALL SEHV ifiE WQRKERS 5CIJR°C£1 $.55.935%Swazi,m£i5 Amican Een'mn‘t;Sarge; WE.WT FO mi C¥§t£$NT Homebound traffic is just beginning to fill downtown Hartford streets as a crowd of workers gathers on the sidewaik near the Old State House. Severai dozen strong,bearing flags and placards,they form a line and begin the famiiiar union chants. Most of the workers at this raily are in food service -cooks,cashiers, servers,dishwashers employed in the cafeterias of downtown businesses or at nearby colleges. They are a cross section of the city and surrounding towns:young and old,male and female,Hispanic, black and white. And they are part of the fastest- growing employment group in the state,what the U.S.Census Bureau calls the service occupations.They account for nearly half the total growth in the state workforce from 2000 through 2006,according to new census figures. The change in the nature of the workforce is nothing new.Across the country,employment in service occupations has grown rapidly for years as the proportion of workers in other areas,particularlymanufacturing,stagnated or declined. But the latest census data indicate the change is happening more rapidly here than in other parts ofthe country.Connecticut ranks in the upper third of states in workforce growth attributed to service occupations,the lowest-paying jobcategory,and near the bottom in growth attributed to professional and managerial occupations,the highest—paying category. Aii aceupa‘tians $3?-,§£1.@imManagamem.emfggaienai $455.5???%S,5&Q EerviCE $23,158 $31.3!) Sales,svffiea mm?mag Farmingi fishing.farestry $3.0m $36i822 Sonwuctian anti mainiiénanm W‘WQ $4E‘3m Pmducticn.t3n3p3matian $31,3l3 33-7‘é3e Mia:wmhgs ”m mi“; ffaanrteetiazm 31.?38 Nevada Efm Masaaehwms 3a§§$Hawaii 33.113- Rhatie l5land 2&6Q3 Maryland ELSE-'i Mawiand 2§.5&2 m Jamey $3.234.New Jersey 2‘3,&§2 Cyameeticut 2i3,1§& A Iaska 2&55?New Yam law. Maw Hampshire 2&3é3 MassachuserB IQEEQ Mada 2a3£2 Rhtée igknd 18,%z£ Hawaii $7,???Alaaks 1&583 New “fark 21km Qeiawana liviw’iii United Staies 2%,565 Li nit-ed grates 1631153 Haw Engiard 2§,¢?1 New England mxza Median Salary by Years Experience -Job:Retail Store Manager (United States) é Print Lem than '1 year{3m}Email g“Embediinyears€3¢i62) 5-?were {Wye} mm:E?yeam{3&3'3) 2E}years wawe:{3553) .,¥m:ilayScate‘t%k Currency:USD i Updated:9/18/2007 i Individuals reporting:12,858 Median Salary by Years Experience -Job:Office Manager (United States) PrintLeaf:man 1 yea: igé)’Email 14'year‘g 2&32}§fi Embed{‘: 5*?years £2.32} 1649 years:game) :20 years :32“ mare:{i3} $8 i ‘8«38 $3 ?ay$cale Currency:USD i Updated:9/23/2007 i Individuals reporting:9,077 e?"‘3?i§w KJu‘3»Q§*‘* v n‘!§i§§ : 35 e e ei ». Median Hourly Rate by Company Size -Job:Retail Serv§ce Clerk (United States) pgq Printwawgw; Emaili-ezém “EmbedEgg-Egewg} 5a_1g9§@z%} Eagemwé} Beaamwgwi33§ 2§i§€i§~§l§§9§(2.12:1 zeagwaggg gm §Q®-19§§g}5} $£¥E3 “39$[38 2 m ma iw?ay5cele 1:3 g é‘i#‘3$t $§6$§§ 12m Currency:USD i Updated:9/23/2007 i Individuals reporting:344 33-49 §3a3§ Median Hourly Rate by Company Size -Job:Office Cierk,Genera!(United States) é.Print EmailSIIE-igg {23?} 3%{E?§3 E?“Embed 20§3-§g§{2E7} 5GQ—iggg {ifiQ mag-age?{aai 5Q§3$—1§g§9 (62} 5€3QQG+{2&1 2QC§QI3~4§§§§{2&3 ir¢ gggi FayScaie {Mm m?!1a CurrencyzUSD i Updated:9/22/2007 i Individuals reporting:1,454 The median earnings of all service-occupation workers in Connecticut rank among the highest in the country at $20,158,but that is less then 55 percent of the statewide median income,according to the census figures,and a little more than a third ofthe earnings of management and professional workers. In addition to being the lowest-paid occupational group,service workers are more likelyto be minorities,more likely to be women and far less likely to have year-round,full-time jobs,according to the survey. Steve Matthews,the Connecticut director of Unite Here,a union that represents workers in food service and other service occupations,likens them to an earlier group of laborers. "The analogy l draw is to the 19103 and '20s,when there was this upsurge in manufacturing,"he said."Those jobs were dirty,difficultjobs,long hours,poor pay and no benefits. "Then,beginning in the 1930s,workers started to organize,"he said."We now look back at the late '40s,'50s and '60s as this golden era of working-class life. That was standing on the shoulders of serious organizing decades before that." There's another similarity:Like the new factory workers of a century ago,many of today's service workers are immigrants.And now,as then,immigrants often draw suspicion and antipathy. Although the American Community Survey figures don't break down the service occupation workers by place of birth,for years much ofthe growth in Connecticut's working age population has come from immigration.And, Matthews said,many ofthe newcomers end up in the kind ofjobs his union targets. How the U.S.Census Bureau defines WhG Are They?Service workers in Connecticut are moreservice‘occupation categories:likety to be minorities and female,and less likeiy to work full time. MlNORlTY FEMALE FULL-TEME MEBlANlNCOME s OU RCE:LLS.Census Bu reau,26%:American Community Sum ey b Protective-service workers (fire- fighters,iaw enforcement officers). p»Health care support workers. b Food preparation and servtce work~ All workers Service workers 54 6% 63.9%$48,714 ers. >Buildings,grounds,maintenance 47.6%48.8%$3L730 workers.35.4% r Personal care workers.23.3%k Transportation,tourism,Eodgéng attendants. Iv Child care workers.,........ Put another way,for every two workers added to the ranks of professional and managerial employees since 2000,three entered service occupations. The pace of change has some economists concerned that Connecticut ultimately could lose its cherished position in the top ranks for per capita income. "We have a disproportionate job creation in lower-income,lower-skill areas,"said Fred Carstensen,professor of economics at the University of Connecticut and director of the Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis."You have to have those jobs -that's part of economic development.You're going to have a range of incomes and skills.But we're getting this corrosive shift away from the higher- income positions.lt's not good." "We're going to see other states do better than we are,"West Hartford economist Ron Van Winkle said."We‘re going to see other states begin to catch us in median income." The men and women marching in a long,thin loop on the Central Row sidewalk in Hartford have an answer forthat concern. "l know for a fact l should get paid a lot more money than l get paid right now," worker Jose Sanchez said. Analogy To 1910s,'205 Connecticut remains among the most white collar of states,with 39 percent of workers over 16 saying they are employed in management or professional jobs, according to the Census Bureau's 2006 American Community Survey,a large- scale national sampling operation.Another 15 percent said they held office jobs. But while those categories accounted for more than half of all workers in 2000, they accounted forjust 28 percent of the people added to the workforce since then. Service workers represented just over 14 percent of all workers in 2000 but more than 47 percent of the growth in the workforce since then.They include nurses aides and home health aides;security guards;food service workers;building and grounds workers;day-care attendants;tourism and hospitality employees;and personal appearance workers. The category also includes relatively well-paying police and firefighting jobs,most of which are unionized and provide benefits,but they account for no more than a tenth of the total.Overall,workers in the service occupations have lower median earnings than any other group. “Our members are from all over the world.They're hardworking and come to the United States to have a better life,"he said."They face ail kinds of chailenges, and our union faces all kinds of challenges,in terms ofthe outright hostility that some sectors of our society have for immigrants." Source Of Concern For all they may lack in terms of pay and benefits,service jobs have one advantage over the manufacturing jobs they seem to be replacing:They aren't Iikelyto be moved out of state or overseas. "Health care,protective services,restaurants aren't affected much by this nationai competition,or world competition,to find the Iowest price,“Van Winkle said."They compete against each other." And in some ways,he said,the rapid growth of service employment can be seen as a sign that Connecticut remains economically healthy,at least for now:The higher your income,the more likely you are to go out to restaurants,for example, or hire gardeners or housekeepers. But jobs in those areas tend to be cyclical,UConn's Carstensen noted,and can be hit hard if the economy falters.That's particularly true in areas such as tourism,which has spurred growth in service employment from the casinos in New London County to the new convention center in Hartford. The expansion of low-paying jobs and stagnation in higher—paid occupations is a sign that the state needs work on bringing higher-paying jobs back to the state, Carstensen said. "lt's a source of real concern for the kind of state that we are,"he said."It just underlines how extraordinarily important it is to have a coherent economic development strategy and for the state to make strategic investments." But Jacqueline Cotto and Jose Sanchez don't want jobs in different industries. They want the jobs they have,in food service,to pay better. That's the point of the downtown demonstration:to push for organization of corporate cafeteria workers employed by Aramark,the 240,000-employee international food service giant.The downtown workers are joined by unionized employees of Aramark and other food-service companies at nearby colleges. Earl Baskerville,president of Unite Here,Local 217,atthe University of Hartford, said he's paid about $19 an hour plus benefits after 1O years with Aramark. Cotto,who works for Aramark at United Healthcare's cafeteria,said she makes $1 1 .64 an hour,without benefits. "l've been there eight years -that was my first food service job.Basically i do everyjob in that kitchen,"she said."We serve like 2,000 customers a day,so it‘s a busy place." Cotto,who is 29,married and has three chiidren,said she thinks about going back to school so she can get a different job,but she would rather stay where she is. "I like the job.It's a good job.I'm a hands-on person,l like to muiti-task,"she said."i like my hours.I'm home when my kids come home —that gives me ail day with them.“ That's only possible,though,because her husband has a good job,with benefits, at the Hartford Ciub. "If i wasn't married and my husband didn't have such a good job,i would be working two jobs to make ends meet because after taxes what you bring home isn't a Iot." Sanchez,47,already works two jobs:40 hours a week for Aramark at Travelers and 3O hours in a union job for the food service company Chartweli's at Trinity Coilege.He and his wife,who also works at Trinity,are raising seven chiidren and depend on the benefits they get from Chartweli's. "I like what i do,"he said.But he'd like to do a bit less of it. "lt'd be nice for me to have one job making that kind of money"that he now gets from two,Sanchez said."That's the way it should be,follow me?Now you can spend time with the kids.Me working back-to-back jobs,by the time i go home, the kids are asleep." Contact Michael Regan at mregan@courant.com. Mamorandum To:Marcia Banach,Dir.Of Planning CC:South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission From:Jeff Folger,Environmental Planner Date:9/25/2007 Re:Status of wetlands on Evergreen Walk As requested I will provide a status report on the wetlands on the Evergreen Walk property,both naturally occurring and man-made. The naturally occurring wetlands on the property consist of several watercourses that act as drainage conduits that channel runoff from the Buckland Road area west to the Plum Gully Brook stream corridor.These watercourses have a flashy nature,in that stormwater significantly effects the water levels in the channels.The development occurs quite close to the watercourses in the eastern portion of the site and was bridged in three locations.Erosion controls were utilized to protect sediment from impacting the watercourses.The erosion controls were successful in preventing sedimentation to the channels.Several areas along the channels were reinforced with either gabion baskets or coconut iiber logs as a mitigation measure.The hard measures (gabions)are working well,but the soft measures (fiber logs)in several places have suffered from the severe storms we have had in the past few years.The watercourse channels continue to generate a bed load to the west but the volumes of sediment is less due to less runoff directly entering the watercourses laterally as it did when the property was farmed. Several lobes of wetland areas are present adj acent to the watercourses that were avoided during construction and are thriving.Groundwater and roof runoff continue to supply water to these areas.Erosion controls adequately protected these areas as well during the construction phase. The created wetlands on the site occur as either stormwater management measures (detention/biofrlters)or as mitigation measures to compensate for wetland losses. Currently,there are four detention/biofrlter basins receiving stormwater runoff from the three phases of the property and the Evergreen Run property as well.All of these structures are fully functional and working as designed.The wetland plant communities present in these structures also act as high quality wildlife habitat and compliment the adj acent natural areas.The mitigation wetlands are fully vegetated with a variety PlANNlNE IIEP'I'. September 25,2007 wetland plants that provide high quality wildlife habitat and an aesthetically pleasingfeaturethatwillbeincorporatedintothefuturewalkingtrailsystemforpublicenjoyment.Additionally,invasive plants adj acent to this area have been removed which will encourage re-colonization by native vegetation. Ms.Robbin L.Cabelus Executive Director State Traffic Commission 2800 Berlin Turnpike,P.O.Box 317546 Newington,CT 06131—7546 RE:Evergreen Walk Expansion Dear Ms.Cabelus: The Town of Manchester is concerned with the developer’s currently proposed traffic mitigation within the Town of Manchester for the Evergreen Walk Expansion in South Windsor.In particular,the developer’s consultant has proposed a triple left turn at the town owned andmaintainedintersectionofBucklandStreetand1-84 Eastbound exit 62.This would apparently be the first of its kind in Connecticut. Although the use of triple left turn lanes has been introduced in other parts ofthe country as an approach to handling at-grade intersections with heavy leh turn movements,the Town has majorreservationsaboutthisconceptandisnotinfavorofestablishingatripleleftturnatBuckland Street and 1-84 Exit 62 for the following reasons: o Downstream traffic weaving between the left lane of the ramp to the right tum only lane at Pavilions Drive will be difficult to safely accomplish. 0 It will be difficult to provide adequate width in the downstream receiving lanes onBucklandStreet. o Motorists in the middle lane will be uncomfortable for fear of sideswipe from the left orright c To a lesser degree,it will be difficult for the town to maintain pennanent,all—weather andclearlydefinedintersectiondashmarkingstodelineatethethreetravellanes. The intersection of Buckland Street and the 1-84 EB ramp is heavily utilized.In 2004,the town’s consultant on State Project 76-197,the Buckland Hills Closed Loop traffic signal system, projected an intersection level of service for the year 2009 of “F”for the Saturday peak hour and“F”for the weekday PM peak hour even with the closed loop system operational and without An Equal Opportunity Employer .dz’Vcbestmé JOSH M.HOWROYD,MAYORLISARO’NEILL.DEPUTYMAYOR 41 Center Street 'P‘O.Box 191 KEVIN L.ZHVGLER,SECRETARY DIRECTORSJASONE.DOUCETTE Manchester,Connecticut 06045—01 91 MA 77HEWB.PEAKCHERIA.PELLEUERwww.ci.manchester.ct.us DA VID M SHERIDANSCOTTSHANLEY.GENERAL MANAGER LOUIS A.SPADA CCINIJOHND.TUPPING October 25,2007 consideration of the Evergreen Walk expansion proj ect.The developel’s consultant is proj ecting the same conditions will result in a level of service‘lJ’during the same peak periods in 201 0. Actual turning movement counts from 2002 show 1,280 left turns from the exit ramp during the peak hour on Saturday in August.“Balanced’counts nom the Buckland Transportation study show 1,460 left turns per hour in 2005.August,2007 counts submitted to DOT nom the Evergreen Walk consultant show 1,1 18 left turns per hour during the Saturday peak period.These discrepancies on existing volumes and level of service assessments require a rigorous review by the STC before consideration of the increased volumes projected by the proposeddevelopment. Although the applicant has proposed geometric revisions at Buckland Street and the 1-84 EB Exit ramp,he has not proposed any other improvements within the Town of Manchester to mitigate the impact of the proposal.The traffic increase that prompted the proposal will also be traversing Buckland Street to the intersection of Buckland Hills Drive.Again,the Town’s consultant says this intersection will be operating at level of service‘E’during Saturday peak hour and‘F’during the weekday PM peak hour with the closed loop system operational in 2009,and the Evergreen Walk consultant proj ects level of service‘T)’and"C’respectively for the same conditions in 2010. In fact,the Evergreen Walk consultant states that even alter the expansion is completed,the intersection will continue to operate at the same level of service. The Town of Manchester is extremely concerned that the proposed expansion will have negative effects on the town roadway system,and mitigation proposals at this time are inadequate.I askthatyouscrutinizetheproposedtrafficprojectionsandrequirethedevelopertoseriously consider alternative mitigation proposals that extend beyond the exit ramp so as not to impose safety and congestion problems on the motoring public and the Town of Manchester. Sincerely,S Scott Shanley General Manager Cc:Mark F.Carlino,P.E.,Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Mark Pellegrini,Director of Neighborhood Services and Economic Development James M.Mayer,P.E.,Traffic Engineer R:\PUBLIC\Units\Design\Traftic\2007\Evergreen Walk expansiondoe TTAORNEYS AT LAW U ERALT SERHWOOD, AND LLC P0.. BOX !20\‘ JURIS NO. 410620 I (860) 6520042- GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT 050336620- - - ENEAVU 701 HEBRON - CITATI ON TO THE MARSHAL OF THE COUNTY OF HARTFORD,OR HIS DEPUTY WITHIN SAID COUNTY,GREETING: BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT,you are hereby commanded to summon the SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,Connecticut t0 appear before the SUPERIOR COURT to be held within and for the JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD,State of Connecticut,on November 20,2007,said appearance to be made by said SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION or its attorney,by filing a written statement of appearance with the Clerk of said court on or before the second day following said retum date,then and there t0 answer the foregoing complaint of EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC,by leaving with the Town Clerk of the Town 0f South Windsor at least two true and attested copies of said complaint and of the summons and citation (one copy for the clerk t0 retain and one copy for the clerk to forward to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission),within the time and manner prescribed by law,and thereafter you are commanded to summon EVERGREEN WALK,LLC,by leaving with Laurence P. Rubinow,Esquire,555 Main Street,Manchester,Connecticut 06040 /239 Cedar Ridge Drive, Glastonbury,Connecticut 06033,its designated agent for service of process,a true and attested copy of said complaint and of the summons and citation in the manner provided by law for the l {w a f9j a r,‘l <f f e (“LL" I k T )_U A g3 T414 \ cc I:f1 (L rL r &, if)a L/@ '\\K 4O am x Kgwnkg§slw1k§l .HW; RETURN DATE:NOVEMBER 20,2007 SUPERIOR COURT EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC HARTFORD VS.AT HARTFORD SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, EVERGREEN WALK,LLC AND EVERGREEN WALK MASTER ASSOCIATION,TNC.OCTOBER 25,2007 ALTER SHERWOOD, AND ATTORNEYS TA LAW LLC O 701 HEBRON AVENUE PO‘. EDX !420 . - JURIS NO. 4‘0620 - 860() 5524OZO< GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT 060336520' ' service of civil process,and to summon EVERGREEN WALK MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC.,by leaving with Laurence P.Rubinow,Esquire,555 Main Street,Manchester,Connecticut 06040 /239 Cedar Ridge Drive,Glastonbury,Connecticut 06033,its designated agent for service of process,a true and attested copy of said complaint and of the summons and citation in the manner provided by law for the service of civil process. Hereof fail not,but of this writ with your doings thereon,due service and return make. l hereby certify that I have personal knowledge of the financial responsibility of the plaintiffs and deem them sufficient to pay the costs of this action. Evergreen Walk Lifestyle Center,LLC,as principal and Lori Macri of 701 Hebron Avenue, Glastonbury,Connecticut 06033 as surety are recognized in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00)to prosecute this appeal to effect and comply with the orders and decrees of this Court. Buckland Road Retail,LLC,as principal and Lori Macri of 701 Hebron Avenue,Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 as surety are recognized in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00)to prosecute this appeal to effect and comply with the orders and decrees of this Court. Dated at Glastonbury,Connecticut,this 25m day of October,2007. WW Petci Jay Algr,Esquire TEALR ESHRWOOD, AND LLC ATTORNEYS TA LAW ' JURIS NO. 410620 ' GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT 060336620- 860() 5524020- ' ' FO.. BOX 1420 701 HEBRON AVENUE I RETURN DATE:NOVEMBER 20,2007 SUPERIOR COURT EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD VS,AT HARTFORD SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, EVERGREEN WALK,LLC AND EVERGREEN WALK MASTER ASSOCIATION,TNC‘ OCTOBER 25,2007 APPEAL FROM THE SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD,t0 be held 0n the 20th day of November,2007 comes EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC,having an address 0f 6410 Poplar Avenue,Suite 850,Memphis, Tennessee 381 19,and BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC,having an address of 6410 Poplal Avenue,Suite 850,Memphis,Tennessee 381 19,and complains and says: l.At all times relevant hereto the defendant SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (hereafter “the Commission”),of 1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074,acted as a combined planning and zoning commission within the meaning of Chapters 124 and 126 of the Connecticut General Statutes, Sections 8-1 et seq,and 8—18 et seq.respectively,and has promulgated Zoning Regulations (hereafter the “Zoning Regulations”). 2.Upon information and belief,Evergreen Walk,LLC,having an address of 555 Main Street,Manchester,Connecticut 06040 and Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc, ALTER SHEWROOD, NDA LLC ATTORNEVS AT LAW 0 FD.. BOX 1420 JURIS NO. 410620 ' (860) 6520420- GLASTONEURY, CONNECTICUT 060335520- - - 701 HEBRON AVENUE - having an address 1109 Rose Lane,Virginia Beach,Virginia 23451,are among the record owners of cenain pieces or parcels of real property comprising approximately 243 Acres,more or less,situated west of Buckland Road,south of Deming Road,and north of Smith Street in the Town of South Windsor.Said land is further identified for tax assessment purposes as Assessor’s Map #27,Parcel #15. On or about July 10,2007,Evergreen Walk,LLC,having a listed address of 1109 Rose Lane,Virginia Beach,Virginia,23451,submitted an application to the Commission for a General Plan of Development and a Special Exception to Article 4.2i4(c )of the Regulations. Plaintiff,EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC,owns certain real property,improved by a commercial real estate development,situated in the Town of South Windsor.The Plaintiff‘s real property is further identified as Unit 2,Evergreen Walk,a Flamed Community and said real property abuts the property that is the subject of the application filed by the defendant Evergreen Walk,LLC,and lies within the property which is subject to the General Plan of Development sought to be amended by said application. Plaintiff,BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC owns certain real property,improved by a commercial real estate development,situated in the Town of South Windsor.The Plaintiffs real property is further identified as Unit l,Evergreen Walk,a Flamed Community and said real property abuts the property that is the subject of the application filed by the defendant,Evergreen Walk,LLC,and lies within the property which is subject to the General Plan of Development sought to be amended by said application. ATTORNEYS TA LAW ' ALTER SHERWOOD, AND LLC PO.. BOX 1420 JURIS NO. 4lO620 ' STONBGLEAURCONNCTIYTUC, 060336620- 860() 5524020- - - 7DI HEBRON AVENUE ' Plaintiff,EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC,holds an option to purchase certain rEal property}situated in the Town of South Windsor.The real property in which Plaintiff EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC holds an option is further identified as Unit 3,Evergreen Walk,a Planned Community and said real property lies within the property which is subject to the General Plan of Development sought to be amended by said application. The Zoning Regulations,Article 8.2.A,contain a requirement that “Applications must be made by the property owner of record,or an individual having substantial interest in the property,or a duly authorized agent or attorney.” The application upon which the Commission acted does not comply with Article 8.2.A.in that it is not made by Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc,and Plaintiff,who are all owners of interests in the property that is subject of the General Plan of Development and the amendment thereto, The Zoning Regulations,Article 8.2.D.l,contain a requirement that an application shall include “....completed application form signed by the applicant and the owner of the property.” The application upon which the Commission acted does not comply with Article 8.2.D.1 in that it is not signed by Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc.and Plaintiff,who are all owners of interests in the property that is the subject of the General Plan of Development and the amendment thereto. 10. ALTER SHERWOOD, ATTORNEYS AND LLC AT LAW ‘ JURIS NO. 410520 ' (850) 5524020* ' GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT 060336620< FO.. BOX 1420 ' 701 HEBRON AVENUE I ll.Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc.was not authorized by a majority in interest of its Board of Directors,its members and/or unit owners to make,join in or participate in the application. The Zoning Regulations,Aiticle 8.2.C.,require that for all Special Exception applications,“the applicant shall notify abutting property owners in writing by mail within 7 calendar days of the time an application is submitted that an application is pending in front of the Commission.The applicant shall provide written proof of mailing.” The applicant failed to comply with the notice and reporting requirement of Article 8.2.C.,with respect to the Special Exception,including but not limited to,by failing to notify Plaintiff BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC,of the pending application, although said Plaintiff is an abutting owner. On or about October 9,2007,the Commission approved the application of Evergreen Walk,LLC as to its proposed General Plan of Development and the Special Exception. A legal notice ofthe Commission’s decision was published on October l3,2007. For the reasons set forth above,and for reasons which may become apparent from a review of the administrative record,the Commission’s decision and administrative findings,inferences,conclusions and decisions relating thereto are: (i)in violation of constitutional,statutory and/or agency regulatory provisions; (ii)in excess of the statutory authority of the agency; (iii)made upon unlawful procedure; (iv)affected by other errors of law; l2. l3. l4. 15. l6. ALTER SHERWOOD, AND LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 0 F0.V BOX 2014 JURIS NO. 04!520 - (850) 5524020- GSTONLABURY. CONNECTICUT 050336620- ' - 70! HEERON AVENUE ' (v)clearly erroneous in View of the reliable,probative and substantial evidence of the whole record;and (Vi)arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion. The Plaintiff is aggrieved by the actions of the Defendant Commission because the Plaintiff is the owner of real property within a radius of 100 feet of the land involved in the decision. The Plaintiff is further aggrieved as it has a specific and legal interest in the subject matter of the Commission’s decision in a manner and extent that is special and not common to other properties or persons in the Town of South Windsor. THE PLAINTIFFS EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC By An¢<<$e’“ Peter Jay Alter,their attorney 701 Hebron Avenue PO Box 1530 Glastonbury,Connecticut 06033 Tel:(860)652-4020Fax:(860)652-4022e—mail:peter.jay.alter@att.netJurisN0.106072 17. 18. JURIS NO. 410520 - (850) 6524020- CLAIMS FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE,the plaintiff appeals from the actions of the South Windsor Flaming and Zoning Commission and prays this Court to render judgment in favor of the plaintiff sustaining this appeal to find that the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision was illegal arbitrary,capricious and an abuse of discretion and/0r that its procedure and/or decision was illegal or unconstitutional,and to reverse the decision ,sustain the appeal,or to grant other such relief as may be appropriate. Dated at Glastonbury,Connecticut this 25th day of October,2007. ATTORNEYS AT LAW i ESHRWOOD, ALTER AND LLC PO.. BOX 1420 GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT 060335620< - I VENUEA 701 HEBRON - e r,Juris No.106072 THE PLAINTIFFS EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC Peteryday AlteiVEsquire 701 Hebron Avenue,P.O.Box 1530 Glastonbury,CT 06033 Tel.(860)652-4020 Fax.(860)652—4022 Their Counsel Juris No.106072 I hereby enter my appearance for the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action. RETURN DATE:NOVEMBER 20,2007 SUPERIOR COURT EVERGREEN WALK LIFESTYLE CENTER,LLC AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF BUCKLAND ROAD RETAIL,LLC HARTFORD VS.AT HARTFORD SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, EVERGREEN WALK,LLC AND EVERGREEN WALK MASTER ASSOCIATION,INC.OCTOBER 25,2007 JOSH M.HOWROYD,MAYOR%zwz gf Manciesier EVIN L.ZINGLER,SECWZARY 41 Center Street 'P‘O.Box 191 JASON E,DOUCETTE Manchester,Connecticut 06045—0191 MA TTHEWH‘PEAK CHERIA.PELLEHER Re:Evergreen Walk ExpansioneTnple Left Turn Dear Matt: Enclosed is a copy of a letter I sent to the STC regarding Manchester’s long standingissueswiththe‘m‘ple left tuni’concept and its impacts on existing failing intersections. Please call if you want to get together on this issue. Respectfully, SJ L~ Scott Shanley General Manager CF ,J ‘l oDZupL‘i Enclosure q’trbeyti'vAllEquulOppommiryEmployer www,ci.manchesrer.cr.us DA VID M.SHERIDAN LOUISA.SPA DA CCINISCOWSHANLEY,GENERAL MANAGER JOHN D.mPPING R EC E W E D November 1,2007 NOV 07 2007 RECEIV ‘ S‘JUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DE.‘T NOV 0 5 ZUU7 Matthew B.Galligan TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSORTownManager Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074—2786 STATE OF CONN ECTICUT MEMBERS Subject:Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk Expansion Enclosed is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report No.132—0706—01 approved at the May 6,2008 meeting of the State Traffic Commissian,detailing conditions for the issuance of a Certificate. In accordance with Section 14—311 of the General Statutes,a building/foundation permit cannot be obtained from the Town until a certificate is issued. A certificate will not be issued by this office until: 1.the Traffic Investigation Report has been recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with Condition No.24,and this office has been provided with evidence of recording (i.e.copy of recorded report); 2.a bond,sufficient to cover the full cost of implementing the required improvements,has been posted with the Department of Transportation District l Office (Attn:Mr.David A.Sawicki)at 1107 Cromwell Avenue in the Town of Rocky Hill,CT 06067,(860)258—4544,as noted in Condition No.2l,and this office has been so notified by that office;and 3.a bond,sufficient to cover the full cost of implementing the required improvements on Buckland Street,has been posted with the Town of Manchester, as noted in Condition No.23,and this office has been so notified in writing by the Town. Additionally,an encroachment permit must be obtained from the District Office prior to performing any work within the state highway right—of—way.An encroachment permit will not be issued until the certificate has been issued and filed on the municipal land records in accordance with the enclosed procedure,a bond has been posted with the Town of South Windsor for the work on Buckland Road,as noted in Condition No.22,and detailed construction plans have been reviewed and approved by the District Office.The approval will expire on May 5, 20l0,unless all the requirements are satisfied. Very truly yours,@mmgw Robbin L.Cabelus Executive Director Enclosures cc:Lieutenant Richard A.Bond Mr.Christopher J.Dougan ~Please confirm certificate issuance with STC. Planninq and Zoning Commission Mr.Stephen E‘.Mitchell,P.E. Mr.Lyle Wray STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION/Commissioner of Transponation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE,P.O.BOX 3 17546 Commissioner ofPublic Safety NEWINGTON,CT 06131-7546 Commissioner of Motor VehiclesPhone:(860)594-3020 Fax;(860)594-2377 May 7 ,2 00 8 RECEI VED Mr.John Finguerra MAY 7 3 2008EvergreenWalk,LLC 1109 Rose LaneVirginiaBeach,VA 23451 Meow Dear Mr.Finguerra: TRA—IDREVI/08 Recommendation: In accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes as revised it isrecommendedthattheStateTrafficCommission(STC)issue a certificate to Evergreen Walk:LLCforthe550,000 square foot expansion of Evergreen Walk,for a total 1,789 000 square-foot grossfloorareamixed-use development including 734,000 square-feet of retail,3,00,000 square-feet ofresidential,75,000 square-feet of indoor recreation,a 130,000 square-foot hotel and 550 000 square-feet of office space with 6,999 parking spaces,located on Buckland Road in South Windsor statingthattheoperationthereofwillnotimperilthesafetyofthepublicbasedonthefollowingconditions. This recommendation is referenced to the plans entitled and dated as follows: A.“Master Plan—General Plan of Development,Evergreen Walk,Evergreen Walk,LLC,”sheetZ—3,prepared by FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc.,dated July 10,2007 and last revisedOctober22,2007. . Windsor, “Evergreen Connecticut,” Walk,LLC, sheet Buckland EX-2,prepared Road,Proposed by Fuss & Improvements O’Neill,dated Manchester/South June 6,2007 and further revised by the Department of Transportation April 8,2008. “Roadway Plan,Prepared For,Evergreen Walk,Buckland Street,Manchester Connecticut ”. sheet RW-l,prepared by F.A.Hesketh &Associates,Inc.,dated June 7:2007 and lastrevisedApril4,2008. .That all conditions of the previous Certificate No.1533-A as described in TrafficInvestigationReportNo.132—0405-01 remain in effect. That the site driveways on Buckland Road and Deming Sn‘eet be located and reflect the geometry in substantial conformance with the referenced plans. That Buckland Road in the vicinity of the southem site drive be widened in substantialconformancewiththereferencedplans. That the 1-84 eastbound off-ramp be widened in substantial conformance with the referenced plans. Report by:JGB Date:04/08 Checked by:PJC Date:04/08 Recommended WW , STATE OF CONNECTICUTDEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION REPORT TO THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION STC No:132-0706-01 L00 N0- Approved by STC Date: See Previous Trafflc Investigation Report No:132-0405-01 Town of South Windsor Location:EvergreenWaIk Buckiand Road Requested by:F.A.Hesketh,Inc. How Requested:Certificate Appiication Date:June 13.2008 gym m 5f 8am EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk Buckland Road Traffic Investigation Report No.132-0706—01 Page 2 That Buckland Street in the vicinity of the 1—84 eastbound ramps be widened in substantialconformancewiththereferencedplans. That all roadway and drainage improvements within the State highway right—of-way besubjecttoreviewbytheDepartmentofTransportationandalltheirrequirementsincludingthosepertainingtomaintenanceandprotectionoftafficbesatisfiedpriortotheissuanceof a permit for work within the highway right—of—way. That the guide rail affected by improvements noted in Condition No.4 be revised in a mannersatisfactorytotheDepartmentofTransportation’s (Department)District 1 Office.The revisionsmayinclude,but are not limited to,the replacement and relocation of the guide rail to conformwithcurrentDepartmentdesigistandards,regrading,and installation of appropriate endtreatments. That the 1-84 eastbound off-ramp be overlaid within the limits of the widening.The extent oftheoverlayistobedetenninedbytheDepartmentofTransportation’s District l Officer That all conflicting pavement markings in the area of roadway work be eradicated to thesatisfactionoftheDepartmentofTransportation. 10.That all work on roadways that are owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in conformance with the standards and specifications of the Town. ll.That all work on roadways that are owned and maintained by the Town of Manchester be performed in conformance with the standards and specifications of the Town. That any cutting,removal or pruning of trees,shrubbery or vegetation situated partially orwhollywithinthelimitsoftheStatehighwayright-of-way be in accordance with Department ofTransportationRegulations. That intersection sight distances be provided and maintained from the site driveways onBucklandRoadandDemingStreetinaccordancewiththeTownofSouthWindsorstandards. That the traffic signal be revised on Buckland Road at southern site drive and the drive toLowe’s and Target. 15.That the traffic signal be revised on Buckland Street at the 1—84 eastbound ramps.Therevisionshallincludemaintainingcoordinationwiththeexistingtown-owned closed loopsignalsystem. l2. l3. l4. Tovsm of South Windsor Evergreen Walk Buckland Road Traffic Investigation Report No.132—0706—01 Page 3 That force-off vehicle detection be provided on Buckland Street northbound between the 1—84 eastbound ramps and the 1—84 HOV ramps.The detection will be designed to help preventvehiclestravelingfromthe1-84 eastbound off-ramp onto Buckland Street northbound from queuing through the intersection with Buckland Street when traffic on Buckland Street northbound is heavy. That the applicant install overhead guide signs on the I—84 eastbound off-ramp approach to Buckland Street,in accordance with Department of Transportation standards. That signs and pavement markings on the 1—84 eastbound off—ramp,Buckland Street and Buckland Road,be installed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans,and in accordance with the “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,”latest edition. That all pavement markings installed on State roads be of epoxy material,or of a material as directed by the Department of Transportation. 20.That an encroachment permit be obtained from the Department of Transportation’s District l Office prior to performing any work within the State highway right-of-way.The permit forms must include the applicable detailed construction plans. 21.That prior to the issuance of a Certificate,a bond be posted and maintained in the amount of $2,600,000 to cover the costs of satisfying the conditions of this report.Upon submission of the final design plans,the dollar amount of this bond may be adjusted either upward or downward during the encroachment permit review process. 22.That prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit,a bond be posted and maintained with the Town of South Windsor to cover the costs of the work required on Buckland Road.Upon posting of the bond,the bond noted in Condition No.21 may be reduced accordingly. 23.That prior to the issuance of a Certificate,a bond be posted and maintained with the Town of Manchester to cover the costs of the work required on Buckland Street. 24.That prior to the issuance of a Certificate,a copy of this report be recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with the attached procedure.A copy of the Certificate shall be recorded on the land records upon issuance. 25.That the STC reserves the right to require additional improvements or changes,as deemed necessary,due to the development’s traffic in the future.The cost of any additional improvements or changes shall be home by the owner of the development. l6. l7. l8. l9. Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk Buckland Road Traffic Investigation Repon No.132—0706—01 Page 4 Mr.Stephen F.Mitchell,P.E.,the applicant’s authorized representative,concurred with the above recommendations,except No.25,on April 9,2008. Lieutenant Richard Bond,representative for the Local Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor,concurred with the above recommendations on April 10,2008. Mr.James Mayer,representative for the Local Traffic Authority for the Town of Manchester, concurred with the above recommendations on April 10,2008. Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk-Buckland Road Trafflc Investigation Report No.132-0706-01 Description: Evergreen Walk is currently certified for a total 1,239,000 square-foot gross floor area mixed-use commercial development with 5,243 parking spaces.The developer is proposing to expand and change the use of previously approved square footage for a total of 1,789,000 square feet with 6999 parkingspaces.The following is a breakdown ofpreviously approved and currently proposed land uses: Access to the development will remain at four previously approved drives;three signalized drives on Buckland Road and one unsignalized drive on Deming Street.The intersection of Buckland Road at the southern site drive and the drive to Lowe’s and Target will be modified as part of the proposedexpansion.The northbound approach of Buckland Road will be widened from four lanes to five lanes in order to provide a double-left into the site drive.The southbound approach will remain as three lanes,but the lanes will be shifted to maintain alignment for the through movement.All roadway widening will be done on the west side of Buckland Road along the development’s frontage.The other three drives will remain as existing. Generated Traffic: The revised site is expected to generate a total of 1154 trips during the a.m.peak hour (840entering,314 exiting),3380 trips during the p.m.peak hour (1429 entering,1951 exiting)and 3361 trips during the Saturday peak hour (1771 entering,1590 exiting).This represents an overall decrease of 187 trips during the a.m.peak hour,an overall increase of 1356 trips during the p.m.peak hour and an overall increase of 1437 trips during the Saturday peak hour from the previously approved volumesi The Bureau of Policy and Planning has reviewed and approved these volumes. Department of Transportation’s Recommendations: Buckland Street at the 1—84 Eastbound Ram§ During the initial STC certification for Evergreen Walk in 2002,the developer proposed an additional lane on the I—84 eastbound off—ramp to provide three lanes onto Buckland Street northbound.At that time,it was felt that the overall capacity of the intersection could be improved by revising the lane configuration on Buckland Street to provide a three lane northbound approach,and that the additional lane for the off-ramp was not necessary. Land Use Approved (sq-ft)Proposed (sq—ft) Retail 3 84,000 734,000Residential0300,000IndoorRecreation75,000 75,000Hotel130,000 130,000 Office 650,000 550,000 Total 1,239,000 1,789,000 Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk-Buckland Road Traffic Investigation Report No.132—0706-01 Page 2 At this time,projected volumes indicate that additional capacity is again needed at this intersection,and it is felt that an additional lane for the 1-84 eastbound off-ramp should now be provided.A preliminary design has been developed which realigns both the on and off-ramps and widens Buckland Sweet.The revised intersection will provide the necessary roadway curvature to allow for three lanes from the off-ramp to continue onto Buckland Street northbound and for a channelizcd right‘tum lane from the off-ramp onto Buckland Street southbound.This preliminarydesignhasbeenagreeduponbytheTownofManchester,the Department of Transportation and the developeri The existing traffic signal will also be revised based on the new geometry of the intersection. In conjunction with the additional lane on the off—ramp,overhead guide signs will be installed to guide motorists to their desired lane.The exact location and specifications of the signs will be determined during the encroachment permit process. Developer’s Recommendations: Buckland Road at the southern site drive and the drive to Lowe’s and Target: In order to accommodate the additional site traffic generated by the revised development,the developer proposes to widen Buckland Road to provide the following lane-use for the northbound approach: t A right-tum lane o Two through lanes o Two len—turn lanes The existing traffic sigial will also be revised based on the new geometry of the intersection. Town ofManchester Concerns: The Town of Manchester has expressed concems regarding traffic operations along Buckland Street,specifically from the 1-84 eastbound off—ramp northerly to the town line.They are concerned about the additional lane from the 1-84 eastbound off—ramp allowing more vehicles off the ramp only to cause delays downstream on Buckland Street.There is a federally funded project currently in construction to upgrade the traffic signals and provide a closed loop traffic signal system in the Buckland Hills area.The intersections along Buckland Street are included in this project.When the intersection of Buckland Street at the 1—84 eastbound ramps is revised as part of this development,the new traffic signal will be coordinated into the new closed loop system.Also,force—off vehicle detection will be providedonBucklandStreetnorthboundtohelppreventvehiclesfromqueuingfromtheoff—ramp through the Buckland Street intersection when traffic is heavy on Buckland Street.The off-ramp is one-mile long,so queues on the ramp are not expected to reach 1-84. The Town of Manchester has also expressed several concems about several details relating to the preliminary design of the intersection of Buckland Street at the 1—84 eastbound ramps.Discussions have taken place between the town,the Department ofTransportation and the developer’s consultant,and it has Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Evergreen Walk-Buckland Road Traffic Investigation Report No.132-0706-01 Page 3 been mutually agreed that these concerns will be addressed during the town’s local approval process of the traffic signal and intersection design. Conclusion: The above described improvements are expected to mitigate the traffic generated by the revised site.A bond in the amount of $2,500,000 will be required to cover the cost of the improvements to the state highway system.Additional bonds will be required to be posted with the towns of South Windsor and Manchester to cover the cost of improvements on town-owned roadways. South Windsor fa“ ROAD noMumcm r‘ RD‘ ?L 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE o SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 TELEPHONE (860)644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 3450 October 12,2010 Mr.Alan Lamson FLB Architecture &Flaming,Inc. 19 Silver Lane East Hartford,CT 061 18 Re:Appl 07-42P,Evergreen Walk General Plan of Development Update &Special Exception to Section 4.2.5.c for 200 Dwelling Units Dear Mr.Lamson: At its October 9,2007,meeting,the Flaming and Zoning Commission voted to approve yourrequestforEvergreenWalkGeneralPlanofDevelopmentUpdateandSpecialExceptionto Section 4.2.5.c of the zoning regulations for 200 residential dwelling units;all located on 243 +/- acres located west of Buckland Road,south of Deming Street and north of Smith Street, Buckland Gateway Development Zone as shown on plans prepared by FLB Architecture & Flaming,Inc,sheets Z1-8;by Insite LLC,sheets L1-2;and by Fuss &O’Neill,EX 1-5,dated July 10,2007 as revised.This approval is subject to the following conditions: .Site Plan of Development approval is required prior to construction,per Section 4.2.l 5D of the zoning regulations.Construction phasing must be included on the Site Plan of Development if appropriate. 2.No building permits will be issued until any required STC approval has been issued (perCGS§14-31 1). 3.This approval is for a General Plan of Development,which does not address many engineering and site design details.The applicant must submit an application for a site planofdevelopmentapproval,at which time the Commission will review all specific details of the proj ect,including but not limited to the following concerns raised during the General Plan application process: o Roadway improvements,which may include new road corridor(s); 0 Pedestrian access across Buckland Road o Traffic calming on Tamarack Avenue o Completion of Tamarack Avenue prior to approval/construction of a second phase ofresidentialconstruction. 4.Completion of Tamarack Avenue through to Hemlock Avenue must occur prior to issuanceofthefirstresidentialCertificateofOccupancy. Black and white mylars of sheets Z3 (1-3)of the General Plan of Development (on 24"x36”sheets),with this approval letter reproduced thereon,must be submitted.After the mylars havebeenendorsedbytheCommission,they will be returned to you for filing in the office 0f theTownClerk.Three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must also be submitted. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk’s office.The special exception will take effect upon filing. Sincerely, Wé?Patrick Kennedy,Chairman Flaming and Zoning CommissionPK/ma Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal I,Patrick Kennedy,Chairman of the South Windsor Flaming &Zoning Commission,herebycertifythatonOctober9,2007 the Flaming and Zoning Commission granted to Evergreen WalkLLCandEvergreenWalkMasterAssociation,Inc.a Special Exception to Article 4.2.4 (c)of theZoningRegulationsto200residentialdwellingunitsonpropertylocatedonthewestofBucklandRoad,south of Deming Street and north of Smith Street,Buckland GatewayDevelopmentZone,as shown on plans prepared by Fuss &O’Neill,EX 1-5,dated July 10,2007asrevised. GIS PIN (See attached deed) OWNER OF RECORD:Evergreen Walk LLC and Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc. Dated at South Windsor,Connecticut this 12 day of October,2010. In ordance with CGS Sectio " /Chairman Patrick Kennedy Planning &Zoning Commission Received for record this atdayof,200 , South Windsor,Connecticut ATTEST: UNIT SIX LEGAL DESCRIPTION A CERTAIN PARCEL IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,THE STATE OFCONNECTICUTCONTAINING12.124 ACRES OR 528,142 SQUARE FEET.SAIDPARCELBEINGMOREPARTICULARLYDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT,SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLYCORNEROFPUDUNIT2OFEVERGREENWALK,LLC.AS DEPICTED ON MAPENTITLED:BOUNDARY SURVEY EVERGREEN WALK,LDC BUCKLAND ROAD&DEMING STREET SOUTH WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT DATED 12/07/09 SCALE1":200’BY FUSS &O’NEILL,INC. THENCE RUNNING:S87°03'03"E,201.77 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINEOFUNIT2EVERGREENWALK,LLC TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:302°56'57"W,191.47 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINEOFUNIT1EVERGREENWALK,LLC TO A POINT. THENCE RUNNING:N87°17'43"W,56.17 FEET ALONG LAND N/F ROBERT J.&BEVERLY E.HAYES TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:N88°22'43"W,238.90 FEET ALONG LAND N/F OF ROBERTJ.&BEVERLY E.HAYES AND 314 SMITH ASSOCIATES,L.L.L.IN PART BYEACHTOAPOINT; THENCE RUNNING:N88°22'43"W,43.40 FEET ALONG LAND N/F LORRAINEM.WHITE TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:N85°09'53"W,170.78 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N05°02'57"E,61.70 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N68°07'06"W,323.36 FEET TO A POINT;THE LAST THREE COURSES RUN ALONG LAND N/F HCTSS,LLC.THENCE RUNNING:N67°31'27"W,271.24 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:519°06'44"W,240.40 FEET TO A POINT;THE LAST TWO COURSES RUN ALONG LAND N/F MARJORIE A.MARQUIS.THENCE RUNNING:N50°16'45"W,325.22 FEET ALONG LAND N/FMARGARETR.FRENCH TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:N18°51'51"W,449.03 FEET ALONG LAND N/F K.F.PROPERTIES,LLC TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:S81°24'04"E,124.63 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:S30°59'04"E,191.19 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:S66°57'03"E,392.20 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N53°09'49"E,205.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:S75°28'37"E,201.28 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:S61°05'50"E,191.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:813°20'06"W,33.69 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:854°58'08"E,230.96 FEET'TO THE PONT AND PLACE OFBEGINNING. P:\99508.13\TSq Zoning Approval 2010\UNIT_6 property description 101011.docCones.(HQ) UNIT SEVEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION A CERTAIN PARCEL IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,THE STATE OFCONNECTICUTCONTAINING35.601 ACRES OR 1,550,782 SQUARE FEET.SAIDPARCELBEINGMOREPARTICULARLYDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT,SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLYCORNEROFPUDUNIT2OFEVERGREENWALK,LIE.AS DEPICTED ON MAPENTITLED:BOUNDARY SURVEY EVERGREEN WALK,LLC BUCKLAND ROAD&DEMING STREET SOUTH WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT DATED 12/07/09 SCALE1”=200’BY FUSS &O’NEILL,INC. THENCE RUNNING:N54°58'08"W,230.96 FEETTO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N13°20'06"E,33.69 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N61°05'50"W,191.66 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N75°28'37"W,201.28 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:853°09'49"W,205.06 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N66°57'03"W,392.20 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N30°59'04"W,191.19 FEET TO A POINTTHENCERUNNING:N81°24'04"W,124.63 FEET TO A POINT;THE LAST EIGHT COURSES RUN ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF UNIT 6EVERGREENWALK,LLC. THENCE RUNNING;N67°14'25"W,454.70 FEET ALONG LAND N/F K.F.PROPERTIES,LLC TO A POINT; THENCE RUNNING:N18°49'56"E,368.60 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N20°46'57"E,452.05 FEET TO A POINT;THE LAST TWO COURSES RUN ALONG LAND N/F JMJ CONSTRUCTION JEANMARCJACQUES. THENCE RUNNING:S69°21'20"E,892.66 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:N20°37'45"E,199.00 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING:859°00'15"E,805.13 FEET TO A POINT;THE LAST 3 COURSES RUN ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNIT LINES OF UNIT 8EVERGREENWALK,LLC. THENCE RUNNING:S22°33'10"W,341.18 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF255.41 FEET,A DELTA ANGLE OF 9°48’50”,AND A LENGTH OF 43.75 FEET TOAPOINT; THENCE RUNNING:N76°24'01"W,40.00 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF328.36 FEET,A DELTA ANGLE OF 26°03’04”,AND A LENGTH OF 149.30 FEETTOAPOINT; THENCE RUNNING:N13°08'40"E,81.61 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE RUNNING ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF606.70 FEET,A DELTA ANGLE OF 11°31’22”,AND A LENGTH OF 122.01 FEETTOAPOINT; P:\99508.13\TSq Zoning Approval 2010\UNIT_7 property description 101011.d0cCones.(HQ) THENCE RUNNING:802°41‘46"W,230.17 FEET TO THE PONT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. P:\99508.13\TSq Zoning Approval 2010\UNII‘_7 property description 101011.doc Cones.(H Q) 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE o SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 TELEPHONE (860)644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 4082 September 19,2011 Alan F.Lamson FLB Architecture &Planning 19 Si1ver Lane East Hartford,CT O61 18 Re:Appl.11—24 P,Evergeen Walk LLC,Final Plan approval,pursuant to Section4.2.15 to include:relocation of residential structures [totaling 203,447 square feet};109,755 square feet of commercial space [121 hotel rooms (7 1,550 square feet)];general commercial space (9,800 square feet);.office space (28,405squarefeet)];to be completed in two phases and to be located on a portion of 151 Buckland Road [within"Evergreen Walk"including portions of Units 6 and 7],and being approximately 1,200 feet west ofBucklandRoadand400’feet north of Smith Street;Buckland Road Gateway Development Zone. We are pleased to advise you that the Planning &Zoning Commission voted on September l3,2011 to approvetheabovereferencedapplicationforFinalPlanapprovalasshownonplanspreparedbyFuss&O’Neil,proj ectnumber2481.320 dated 4/25/11 as revised,with the following modifications. 1.Prior to commencement of any 'site work,a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2.No building‘‘permit will be i'Ssueduntil'the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3.This application is subj ect to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/ConservationCommission,including bonds in the amount of $50,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance oferosionandsedimentcontrols;$50,000 for construction of stormwater systems;and $3 0,000 for wetland plantings. 4.A landscape bond in the amount of $50,000 is required and must be submitted pn'or to filing of mylars. 5.All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6.An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Article 9.l .2.B of the ZoningRegulations. 7.All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town ofSouthWindsor. 8.This approval does not constitute approval ofthe sanitary sewer,which can only be granted by the WaterPollutionControlAuthority. 9.The building street numbers must be included on the final plan. 10.Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11.All nee standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12.If a State Trafiic Commission certiiicate is required,no building pennits will be issued until the certificate has been issued (per CGS §14-3 1 1). 13.The Town Engineer’s review comments dated September 8,201 1,as revised 9/1 3/11 must be incorporated into the final plans. 14.The zoning data table must include all zoning data (e.g.parking and open space)and included on the planstobeiiledintheTownClerk’s office. 15.The phasing of the improvements of the required open space should be clarined on the plans. 16.Architectural elevations for all non-residential building in Phase II must be reviewed by the Architecture and Design Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. ‘I 7.The Fire Chief's comments regarding ire hydrant locations must be added to the plans.-f 18.The conditions of the site plan phasing of the Development Area Plan include the “Phasing Sequence forFinalPlan”document submitted by the applicant and included as Attachment A. 19.The blinking light for the pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Evergreen Way and Tamarack Ave.must be evaluated for its effectiveness prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy in Phase 2. 20.The Recreational trail shown for phase l must be connected to the trail in phase 2 and the trail extendednorth-up to the unit 8 parcel. 21.A school bus shelter must be.added to the plans in a location designated by the Board of Education in compliance with current BOB policies. 22.The developer must examine the sequencing of the traffic lights along Buckland Road and makeadjustmentstothetimingasappropriate. 23.The roof top screening for the hotel must be added to block the views from Buckland Road of all themechanicalunits. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet #C8101 C8104 CG1 12 with the above modifications together With three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations and landscaping plans)must be suomittea to tnis Conmnssmn to oe stamped and Sigied The letters Oi approval of tnis Co‘nniisswn as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commissmn must be reproduced on the mylars After the mylars have been signed by the Commission,they will be returned to you for tiling in the Office of theTownClerk.After tiling these plans,a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, /C m Patrick ChalrmanPK/ma Kennedy, Flaming and Zoning Commisswncc:Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor of Pollution ControlSuperintendent Fire Marshal Hhm Wit IF Phasing Sequence for Final Plan as Provided in Site Plan Agglicau‘on Phase 1: 1.Temporary extension of Evergreen Way behind LA Fitness to Tamarack Avenue (adjacent to ECHN2),including temporary sidewalk for pedestrian access. Widening and improvements to Tamarack Avenue (north-south along Town Square project). Modifications and improvements to Tamarack Avenue (east-west between Shops atEvergreenWalkandLLBean). Pedestrian access from LL Bean site to Town Square along south side-of Tamarack .Avenue. Pedestrian access and improvements between Shops at Evergreen Walk and TownSquare. Modifications to and lighting at Shops at Evergreen Walk Site Preparation Parts Aand B (includes construction of Detention Basins 2 and 2a). South portion of ring road through Town Square. Town Square construction. 10._Hotel and associated parking,access drives,sidewalks,utilities and otherimprovements. 11.South residential building and associated parking,access drives,sidewalks,utilitiesandotherimprovements. 12.Water main l00p to serve Phase I and Phase 2. 13.Natural gas loop to serve Phase 1 and Phase 2. 14.Commercial buildings (2)south of hotel and within Town Square,and associatedsidewalks,utilities and other improvements. Phase 2: 1.Trunk sewer relocation. 2.Northerly residential building and associated parking,access drives,sidewalks,utilities and other improvements. 3.Office condominiums and associated parking,access drives,sidewalks,utilities and other improvements. Special Phasing Conditions: 1.Prior to commencing construction activities in Phase 2:(a)the commercial building shall be “substantially constructed”in Phase 1,which means that all framing, sheathing and roofing of the commercial building in Phase 1 shall be completed;(b)the improvements at the Buckland Road and Tamarack intersection shall be completed;(c)the tempomry intemal connection of Tamarack and Evergreen Way shall be completed (Without final coat)and (d)a surety or performance guarantybondasprovxdedbylawshallbeprov1dedinanamounttoassurethecompletion of all Site improvements intended to be completed as part of Phase 1 which site improvements shall constitute all utilities storm water system comnonents Site lighting,retaining walls driveways,parking areas roadways,sidewalks curbs Signs, linestnping,guiderails fences grading and seeding All such site improvements in Phase 1 and items (b)and (c)above shall be completed Within one year of the date that building construction activities in Phase 2 are commenced A reduction in the amount of said surety or performance guaranty bond shall be permitted as Site improvements are completed in Phase 1 However,Site preparation,construction of the Site improvements and construction of the building foundations in Phase 2 shall be permitted Without having to comply with the aforementioned provisions providedforinthisspecialphasingcondition. 2.Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for the residential building in Phase 2:(a)all construction in Phase 1 shall be completed,including all site improvements;(b)at least fifty (50%)percent of the commercial buildings required for the 2:1 residential /commercial square footage ratio in Phase 2 shall be“substantially constructed,”which means that all framing,sheathing and roofing of such commercial buildings shall be completed and (c)a surety or performance guaranty bond as provrded bylaw shall be provrded m an amount to assure the completion of all Site improvements intended to be completed as part of Phase 2 which shall constitute all utilities storm water system components Site lighting, retaining walls,driveways,parking areas,roadways,sidewalks,curbs,signs, linestriping,guiderails fences grading and seeding in Phase 2 A reduction in the amount of said surety or performance guaranty bond shall be pennitted as Site improvements are completed in Phase 2 2032l19vl 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE o SOUTH WINDSOR.CT 06074 TELEPHONE (860)644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7007 1490 0000 3753 1193 October 16,2007 Mr.Alan Lamson FLB Architecture &Planning,Inc. 19 Silver Lane East Hartford,CT 061 18 Re:Appl 07-42P,Evergreen Walk General Plan of Development Update Dear Mr.Lamson: At its October 9,2007,meeting,the Flaming and Zoning Commission voted to approve yourrequestforEvergreenWalkGeneralPlanofDevelopmentUpdateasshownonplanspreparedby FLB Architecture &Flaming,Inc,sheets Zl-S;by Insite LLC,sheets L1-2;and by Fuss & O’Neill,EX 1-5,dated July 10,2007 as revised.This approval is subject to the followingconditions: .Site Plan of Development approval is required prior to construction,per Section 4.2.15.D of the zoning regulations.Construction phasing must be included on the Site Plan of Development if appropriate. 2.No building permits will be issued until any required STC approval has been issued (perCGS§14-311). 3.This approval is for a General Plan of Development,which does not address many engineering and site design details.The applicant must submit an application for a site planofdevelopmentapproval,at which time the Commission will review all specific details of the project,including but not limited to the following concems raised during the General Plan application process: o Roadway improvements,which may include new road corridor(s); o Pedestrian access across Buckland Road ViizlWPABEOWW l/II/Illllllllll I!!!III/IIIIIIIIIIIIIII/I IIIIIIWII/Illlllllll!IIIIIIIII F11e#BookDoc ID:21913295 Page002084360004 48 -51 Type:LAN 303Vp I,Patn‘ck Kennedy,Chaimlan of the South Windsor Planning &Zoning Commission,hereby certify that on October 9,2007 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Evergreen Walk LLC and Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc.a Special Exception t0 Article 4.2.4 (c)ofthe Zoning Regulations to 200 residential dwelling units on property located on the west ofBucklandRoad,south of Deming Street and north of Smith Street,Buckland GatewayDevelopmentZone,as shown on plans prepared by Fuss &O’Neill,EX 1—5,dated July 10,2007 as revised. GIS PIN (See attached deed) OWNER OF RECORD:Evergreen Walk LLC and Evergreen Walk Master Association,Inc. Dated at South Windsor,Connecticut this 12 day of October,2010. In ordance with CGS Sectio ,’C}\.f Chairman Patrick Kennedy Planning &Zoning Commission \ Received for record this >day of ,20 at South Windsor,Connecticut ATTEST: (0H)'sauoa nnp‘uoml Honduosap Kuadmd Q‘JJNmmoz [mmddv gulwz bs¢\€1'80§66\:d ‘QNINNIQHa do EDVH CINV lNocI aHL OL ‘Laai 96'09z ‘3“80 .8§ovSS :SNINNmI aaNaHiflNIOdvo;lagd 69'9;‘AAH90 .oz aEIS ISNINNHH aaNaHLEmmavOLL33599‘I6I ‘3“09 .So 019s ISNINNmI HQNHHLiLNIoaVOL133:1 8Z'I0z ‘HHLQ .8z ogLs :9NINNmI HQNaHlfLNIoaVOLmag90'§0z ‘amv .60 °€§N IDNINNmi HQNHHLflNloavOLmagOZ‘Z6£Hugo ‘LS 099s :DNINNmI HQNHHLfLNIOdVOLmag61'I6I ‘awo ‘6s 009$:QNINNmI aaNaHlfLNIoaVOLHEM€9'17ZI ‘Ewo ‘vz OI8S :DNINNHH aaNEIHlfLNIoaVOL3T1‘Salmadoad an a/N QNV1 DNmV 133d $061717 ‘AAHIS .19 °8IN :DNINNHH EDNHHLflNIOdVOLHGNHHg ‘H laHVQHVwg/N aNV1 9N01V L335 ZZ’szg mugv ‘9I OOSN :DNINNmI 33N3Hl‘SIHOHVW ‘V 3momvw 3/N (INV3 QNOTV N03 s3sar103 0m LSV3 3H3fLNIOdVOLL333017'0vz ‘mm .90 °6IS :DNINNmI 3:)N3HlELNIOAVOL3333VZ'ILZ ‘m..Lz ‘IE oLgN :QNINNna 33N3H1 OTI ‘SSLQH 3/N GNV3 9N03V Nmi $391003 33331 LSV1 3mfLNIOdVOLL33399€z£‘AA‘.90 .L0 089N IQNINNmI 33N3HLfLNloaVOLL3330L‘I9 ‘3‘.L9 ‘zo OSON :QNINNmI 33N3HLfLNIOdVOLL3338mmMUES.60 .S8N :9NINNmI 33N3HLfLNIOdVOL3LIHAA ‘w 3NIV3303 3/N GNV3 QNOTV L333 ov‘gv ‘mmv .zz 088N :9NINNmL 33N3HLfLNIoaVOLH3V333LHVdN13'33 ‘s3LV130SSV HLIws H9 GNV S3AVH ‘3 A333A33 7?‘r L33308 3o 3/N aNV3 9N03V L333 06'8sz ‘AA..£17 .zz .88N :DNINNHH 33N3HLfLNIOdVOLS3LVH'3 A333A3373>‘r LH3303 3/N GNV3 9N03V L333 LI'9§‘AA..£17 .LI oLgN :DNINNmx 3:)N3HL‘LNIOJ V OL 333 ‘X3VAA N33HQH3A3 I LINn 3o 3NI3 A333LS3AA 3HL 9N03V L333 H7361 ML;.99 ozos :9NINNmI 33N3HLfLNIocIVOL333‘33VAA N333333A3 z LINn 3o 3N13 A3H3HLnos 33L 3N03V L333 LL'Ioz 3€0 £0 oLss ISNINNmI 33N3HL ‘QNI ‘TIIHN‘O 79 SSFH A8 ‘OOZ=“IHWDS60/L0/ZI GHLVG .LflOLLDHNNOD ‘HOSCINIAA HIHOS JEHELS DNIWHG 78’ GVOH (INVFDIDI‘IS OTI ‘XIVM NHHHDHEAE AEAHHS AHVCINOOS 1G31LILNH dVW NO GHlOIdEICI SV 011 ‘)I'IVAA NEIHHDHHAH :IO Z .LINH GHd :IO HHNXOQ AFIHHLSBAAHLHOS HHJ.NO DNIHS lNIOd CIIVS ‘LNIOd V .LV {)NINNIDHQ :SAAOTIO&SV GHSIHDSHG A’IW’IHDLLHVd HXOW DNIHE ”IHQHVd GIVS 113333 HXVHOS ZVI‘SZS HO SEIHDV VZI‘ZI DNINIVLNOD IHQILDHNNOC) :IO HLVLS HHI ‘HOSGNIAA HiflOS iO NAAOI HHJ.NI ”IHOHVd NIVLHHD V NOIJAIHDSEG TVSEI’I XIS .LINf] bnDUmmyaszrL (OH)'swoa 30m IOIOI Honduasap Kuodwd L‘uNmomz mmddv guuwz bsml‘sos‘sévd fLNIOd V OimagI0‘zz1 :10 HmNErI V CINV zzz (IE an §0 319W vnaa V ‘iaad 0L'909 :10 snIGVH V QNIAVH mom am OL Emma V SNOW QNINNmi HQNHHIflNIOdVOLmag[9‘18 ‘a..017 .80 °£IN :DNINNnH aoNaHlfLNIoaV OL L333 096171 :10 HLDNEH V (INV 2170 £0 o9z Jo 319W VHEICI V 133a 998a :10 snIGVH V DNIAVH 1:131 HHL OL aAana V SNOW DNINNnH aaNaHlflNIOdV01mag00'017 ‘AAHIO .vz 09m :DNINNmI EDNHHLfLN10&V OL mag SL117 :10 HLDNEH V (INV 2‘09 1817 o6 :10 310W VHEIG V 133:1 It'ggz 30 smaVH V 0N1AVH 1333 3111 01 3A11110 V 0N01V 0NINNm1 30N3H1f1NIOdV011333811W‘AAHOI £5 ozzs :0NINNm1 3:)N3H1 0T1 ‘>1”1VAA N33HD113A3 8 11m 30 S3Nn 11m AIH3H100s 3H1 0N03V N011 $333000 g 1SV"1 3H1f1N103V011333£1'§08 ‘3..SI 100 o6ss :DNINNmI 30133131f1N10c1V01133300'661 3§v 11:00w :DNINNna 331331-11f1N103V01133399'Z68 ‘3“0z .IZ °69S :0NINNmI 30N3H1‘S3000V1 oaVw NV3I 11011001119100 rm 3/N (INV'I 0N03V N011 s3s3000 0M1 1SV3 3H151N103V011333s0‘zsv ‘3“Lg 1917 oozN =0N1NN03 30N3H151N103V01133309'899 ‘3“9g 16v O81N =0N1NN03 30N3H1f1N10c1V010T1031111330113‘3‘)1 3/N CINV'I 0N0"1V 1333 011707 ‘mugz 1171 oLgN f0N1NN011 30N3H1'033 ‘>11VAA N3311033A3 9 1INO 30 3N0 13113H1110N 3H1 0N03V N011 s3s11000 1H013 1SV”1 3H1f1N1011V011333£9'17z1 ‘AAnvo .vz OISN :DNINN011 30N3H1 1N1011 V 01 1333 61'161 ‘muvo .6§°0£N :DNINN011 30N3111f1N1011V0113330Z'Z62 9111.90 .LS °99N :0NINN011 30N3H1f1N103V01133390'S0z 7111617 .60 °£§s :0NINN011 30N3H1f1N103V0113338z‘10z ‘muLs .8z DSLN :DNINN011 30N3H1i1N1011V01133399‘161 ‘muog .go 019N :0N1NN011 30N3H1f1N103V01133369m‘3190 .oz °£1N =0NINN011 30N3H1f1N103V01133396'05z ‘AA..80 .8s 017SN :0N1NN011 30N3H1 ‘ONI ‘TIIHN1O 75’SSfH A8 :00Z=11I HWDS 60/L0/ZI CIHLVG .LflDIlDHNNOD ‘HOSGNIAA HlflOS IEIERLLS 9NIWHG 78’ CIVOH GNV'DIDDS 3T1 ‘)I’IVAA NEIHXDBHAEI AHAHHS AHVGNHOH ZGHFLLILNH dVW NO GHlQIdHG SV 0’11 ‘XFIVAA NHHHDHHAH :IO Z IINH CHM :IO HHNXOD ArlkIEILSHAAHlHOS HHI NO DNIHH lNIOd (IIVS ‘lNIOd V lV DNINNIDHH 1SAAO'TIOI SV GHSIHDSHG A1HV1DOILHVd HHOW DNIHH 'IHOHVd GIVS 'lEIHi HHVDOS Z8L‘0SS‘I HO SHHOV I09‘S‘5 DNINIVINOD lfDLLDEINNOC) :10 HLVIS HHL ‘HOSGNIAA HlflOS :IO NAAOL EHL NI "IEDHV&NIVLHHD V NOIMIHDSEIG TVDH’I NEAES lINfl 01001911111120 VQLZI QiPmEUUSI THENCE RUNNING:802°41‘46"W,230.17 FEET TO THE PONT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. dég/ajfo'ZOHT-\,ENEU l f‘;\r-g: :Lmm '1 2&\§V¢L’U\§J&Q ff \u g ¢k$lrhk P:\99508,13\T5q Znning Approval 2010\UNIT_7 property description 1010ll.doc Cones,(HQ) A Stormwater Management Report‘EVergreen Walk State Traffic Commission Drainage Report Buckland Road South Windsor,CT June 12,2007 FUSS &O’NEILL Disciplines ta Deliver Fuss &O’Neill 146 Hartford Road Manchester,CT 06040 FUSS &O’NEILL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT EVERGREEN WALK BUCWD ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES END OF REPORT A WATERSHED MODEL PODUNK RIVER WATERSHED TO VINTON’S PONDA'I'ROUTE 30 -EXISTING CONDITIONS (PONDPACK) B WATERSHED MODEL FULL BUILD ANALYSIS ‘PODUNK RIVER WATERSHED TO VINTON’S POND AT ROUTE 30 ~PROPOSED CONDITIONS (PONDPACK) F3 STORM SEW/ER SIZING (FOR DESIGNED PROJECT UNITS) F:\I’2000\d8l \1\30\S’I‘C\I)mimge Rcpnndnr SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 5.0 METHODS 5.1 Storm Sewer System 5.2 Podunk River Watershed Analysis .............................................................................. 6,0 PODUNK RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS .................................................................. 6.1 Assumptions in the Model ............................................................................................3 7.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................4 EECEIVEDFIGURES 1.USGS LOCATION MAP aux I U 2m}? WATERSHED MAP SQUIH WINDSOR PWINING DEPT. 3.SOILS MAP 4.FEMA MAP FUSS 8zO’NEILL 1’0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This stormwater management report has been prepared in support of the Evergreen WalkMasterDevelopmentPlanbasedontheplanentitled,“Preliminary Plan of Development,PPD»l,dated 6/5/07 by FLB Architecture 8c Planning,Inc”.The original property consisted oflargeareasofmeadowandforestedareasaroundtheedgesofthefields.The total area of thedevelopmentis240acreslocatedonthewestsideofBucklandRoadextendingfromSmithStreetnorthtoDemingStreet. Some 0f the property has been developed.The following projects have been constructed or areapprovedforconstruction:The Shops at Evergreen Walk,a portion of the Expo DesignCenter(now being constructed for L.L.Bean),LA.Fitness,ECHN,and ECHN IIV Theremainingparcelsopenfordevelopmenthaveconceptualdesignswhichincludeaddinonalofficespaces,retail,a hotel,and a mixed use development. Evergreen Walk drains to Plum Gulley Brook which subsequently,crosses under Clark Street inSouthWindsor,Plum Gulley Brook terminates at Vinton’s Mill Pond.The discharge from this pond crosses under CI‘IRT—30 and discharges into the Podunk River.The watershed analysisdesignpointistheculvertunderRoute30andincorporatesthesubwatershedswhichcontribute to this design point. Existing (preidevelopment)and proposed (postidevelopment)hydrologic conditions for the sitewereevaluated.Without a proposed stormwater management system,the addition of impervious surface area resulting from development would cause an increase in peak runoffflowratesfromthesitetotheRoute30designpoint. A stonnwater management program has been designed to address the increase in peak runoff,while maintaining existing drainage patterns.Stormwater runoff from developed portions ofthesite(the constructed and future developments,associated access,and parking lots)will becollectedincatchbasinsandraingardenswhichdischargeintomultipleexistingandproposeddetentionbasinslocatedthroughouttheproperty.The detention basins will discharge into Plum Gulley Brook.Peak rates of runoff from the 2,10,25 and 100-year design storms into the receiving drainage systems will be less than the preidevelopment peak flow rates.As aresult,the Evergreen Walk Master Development Plan does not adversely impact the state drainage facility at Route 30. The storm sewer capacity analysis has been provided in this report for the constructed andapprovedprojectunitsontheEvergreenWalkproperty.The conceptual design of the remaining parcels does not include storm sewer sizing. 2.0 INTRODUCTION Evergreen Walk,LLC proposes to construct Evergreen Walk in accordance with the MasterDevelopmentPlanatBucklandRoad,South Windsor,Connecticut.A site location map is presented as Figure 1. F:\PZO(l0\4M \.-\5ll\S'l‘C\Dramuge Reportdor FUSS &O’NEILL This report was pmpaxed to evaluate exisu'ng hydrologic conditions and the proposedstormwatermanagementsystemforthedevelopedsite,including the effects of the development on receiving drainage systems.The report presents design calculations for the constructed or approved for construction stormwater collection and conveyance system,and the design calculations and analyses of all existing and proposed detention basins. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The Podunk River drainage area encompasses over 7,000 acres at the Route 30 design point,which includes approximately 2,700 acres of Plum Gulley Brook drainage area (Watershed Map, Figure 2).A large percentage of the drainage area is comprised of residential area,\vhile the remainder is forest and farmland.Approximately half of the area has Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS,formerly SCS)soil type B.The Podunk River drainage area has some areas of type C soil,and both the Plum Gulley Brook and Podunk River drainage areas have small amounts of type A and D soils (Soil Maps,Figure 3).The project’s location on FEMA mapping is depicted in Figure 4. The majority of Evergreen Walk is currently large areas of meadow and forested areas around the edges of the neldst The Shops at Evergreen Walk,a portion of the Expo Design Center (now being constructed for L.L.Bean),LAY Fitness,ECHN,and ECHN II are constructed or currently under construction and have been included as exisnng conditions for stormwarer modeling.The area drains from higher points in the east to Plum Guliey Brook to the west. Analysis of the Podunk River Watershed to Vinton’s Pond is included in Appendix A (existingconditions)and Appendix B (proposed conditions). 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed master development plan includes projects already constructed or approved for construction such as The Shops at Evergreen \Walk,a portion of the Expo Design Center (nowbeingconstructedforL.L.Bean),LA.Fitness,ECHN,and ECHN II.In addition,the remaining parcels for development have conceptual designs which include additional office spaces,retail,a hotel,and a mixed use development The development includes access drives, parking facilities,and utilities. Detentions basins N0.1,4,and 8 have been constructed at Evergreen \Valki Detention basin 7 has been approved for construction.Detennon basin 2 has been proposed as the final basin for the Master Development Plan.Based on the attached analyses of downstream conditions at the property line,at Plum Gullev Brook at Clark Street and at the Podunk River at Route 30 it will be necessary to detain storniwater runoff from the proposed site due to the timing of the hydrograph peaks for developed conditions.Stormwater runoff will be collected in catch basins with 4 foot sumps and trap hoods and will be discharged into the detention basins.The capacity of the detention basins and their outlet structures are designed for development in accordance with the Evergreen Walk Master Plan without increasing the peak flows of the Podunk River at Route 30. F'\P2000\481 \x\3l)\ST(i\Dmmagc Reportdoc 2 FUSS &O’NEILL The stoxm sewer systems have been designed to convey the 25‘year storm in accordance withtheTownofSouthWindsorregulations.Pipes will be corrugated plastic pipe with a minimumslopeof0.5%.The method used to size the pipes is described below.The storm sewer systemsforthefuturedevelopmentsdescribedintheMasterDevelopmentPlanwilladheretothesamedesigncriteriaabove. Because the design point for the analyses is the Route 30 crossing of the Podunk River and peak flows to that design point are proposed to be reduced,the capacity and adequacy of theState’s drainage facility was not calculated. 5.0 METHODS 5.1 Storm Sewer System The storm sewer system was sized using the StormCAD computer model (Storm Sewer Sizing,Appendix C),Input information for the model was derived using Rational Formula methodsbasedonthedrainageareasdepictedinthedrainageareamapsinAppendixC.Times ofconcentrationforpavedareaswereassumedtobetheminimumallowabletjmeof5minutes.The StormCAD output indicates that all of the proposed pipes will have adequate capacity. 5.2 Podunk River Watershed Analysis Haestad Method’s Pondpack computer program was used to model the Plum Gulley Brook andPodunkRiverwatersheds.The analyses for existing and proposed conditions on the Podunk River at Route 30 for the Evergreen Walk Master Development Plan are included as Appendix A and Appendix B respectively.The Pondpack program is based on NRCS TR—20 calculation methods.The methods described in the NRCS TR~55 manual were used to calculate the input data for this model.Times of concentration were calculated using the TR—SS methods for sheet and shallow concentrated flows. 6.0 PODUNK RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS 6.1 Assumptions in the Model The following assumptions were made in the model: 0 Channel storage in Plum Gulley Brook and the Podunk River are negligible O Storage in Vinton’s Millpond is negligible Both of the above assumptions were proven to be valid in early stages of the model.Storage and outfall information for Vinton’s Millpond were entered into early versions of the model and were subsequently removed after being shown to have no effect on discharge ratesi As can be seen on the drainage area map,the Podunk River passes through swampy areas which could attenuate flood flow.The Muskingum channel routing option was used t0 model F:\]’2000\481 \/\}0\S'I‘C\Dminagc Report doc 3 FUSS 8L O’NEILL the potential effect of this storage,which was found to have no effect on How.In order to simplify the model,the channel storage was removed from the model in subsequent runs, To calibrate the model,Curve Numbers (CNS)of 50 were arbimzrily assigned to the PlumGulleyBrookandPodunkRiverdrainageareas.Originally,CNS of 64 and 65,respectively,were calculated for these areas based on land use and soil type,but yielded a 100 year dischargeof6,500 cfs,compared t0 the FEMA flow of 2,580 cfs for a similar watershed on the PodunkRiver.Although the CNs for these areas may be artificially low,they remain constant duringevaluationofexistingandproposedconditions,and have no impact on evaluating how stormwater should be managed at the Evergreen Walk site.For this model,the time ofconcentrationisthemoreenticalvariable,as the timing of peak flows determines the extent oftheproposedeffectsontheexistingconditionsmorethantheCN. The times of concentrations for both the Plum Gulley Brook and Podunk River watershedsweremeasuredfromthemosthydraulicallyremotepointofthewatershedstothepoints atwhichthestreamsconcentrate.The paths of the times of concentrations are labeled “Tc”,andcanbefoundontheUSGSWatershedMap(Figure 2).The travel times of the receiving streamsweremodeledusingModifiedPulsrouting.The streams were modeled with 50:1 side slopes,which represent the relatively mild slopes of the overbank areas which flood flows would passovertThechannelroutingremainsconstantbetweenexistingandproposedconditionsanddoesnothavealargeimpactontheresults. 7.0 SUMMARY The existing discharge is taken from the PondPack Model,Podunk River Watershed toVinton’s Pond at Route 30 —Existing Conditions in Appendix A.The proposed discharge istakenfromthePondPackModelFullBuildingAnalysisofPodunkRiverWatershedtoVinton’s Pond at Route 30 —Proposed Conditions in Appendix B.Pre and post-development flow ratesforthePotlunkRiveratVinton’s Millpond dam will be: Development in accordance with the Evergreen Walk Master Development Plan will notadverselyimpactthestatedrainagefacilityatRoute30. F:\P2000\48l \1\30\STC\Drainage RcporLdne 4 Frequency (yrs) Existing Proposed ChangeDischarge (CFS) Discharge (CFS) (CFS) 2 163.44 163.02 04210972.90 970.39 —2.51 25 1722.27 171 8.35 V3.92 100 3646.83 3499.20 4147.63 out 515mm ‘wuwronaocou FUSS &O y NEILLDiyciplinextoDeliver ”5 "‘RWRD R9 “MC“KST‘R‘C’050‘“5505‘67‘59 EVERGREEN WALK,LLC USGS LOCATION MAP QUADRANGLE NAME:MANCHESWRQUADRANGLENUMBER:41072765-TF-024EVERGREENDEVELOPMENT sown \vmnsoR CONNEcncm ”URL Hm, mumum Non V9“ cumuc 5cm P4 : aw x w a w r g rm .g w bo o m " ; .1 9§ $ é ¥ 1 £ 1 4 \L n r w ‘ . » § .m i . r} ‘m m k w m I O Z < _ > — Q m m QZ E Q < 2 z ‘ ._ §% .q 2- m £ . . m n & l w § 33 $ ,, H. ” >m 2 2 m a .0 4 . x ¥K < m .. . £1 , n; . . ru b / y «m m < m¢ « z . < ¢ n . W \W . . \ ‘ } . . \ . ” J/ $4 . 5 6 55 . x . r’ u <m m < mw < z _ < m o A mm z m x2 3 9 . . é Q . m e . 170 0L ) . . . , ‘ m9 hu m u 00 0 0 m m M2 ~ k9 ; z ms w 2 «Kw é a. . . . \% o 5\c _\, - \ .. . W H i V7 I4! .y o .. , . . -_ n . h V. #4 . . , .. . _‘ \t ’ i . \é @ ._ r. . . . vb . x . , . .. . r/ . . ‘ ‘ x~ Fagl-, ?AM swos J3A“ r.g=,3\”"-/j3&"“s’"’t§§ sea ’§’dyfé?” Cf A'3 i ..‘ >.g‘im23:)“’o £0 -OD 8O'Jn:gég:i(0m3%Eu. gou. J 4. ;I m -_‘’ :‘E-@¥%~'h‘e‘.' -~ WK Rag:xupf) ,i .x‘m.‘ v‘” ?\é 4-—?EMA Mk? ‘ 3 Fr—‘ MRumgULLY a;\BRooK '‘1T W" MAP SCALE 250 0 H _j‘P1 1 -"=500' $00 1000 FEE1 _a A 50 “V ‘ "3%., i 1h‘‘‘ ‘ ,y.\PANEL 0,008E “ {‘ ‘ J‘ FLOHD INSURANCE RATE MAP TOWN OF soUTH wmDsOR, CONNECTICUT HARTFORD COUNTY PANEL 3 OF 13 (BEE MAP INDEX FDH FIRM PANEL LAXOUYI‘m ggMmuMW NyMm m wsoummmomamasmamams m MAP Mun/1mnauuaaonuaE J MAP REVIsEn1ummamIs.mos‘‘Fcdzml Emergency Mxmgtmem Agency J / A " ‘ A‘§yt . ' e é ‘m9,,"‘nw %VA ‘ ‘m3w i@ " ;‘ m %I/V / ‘/x V PRDJECT éAREACUNTINUEsTusnUTHr\I 1i %v *w This IB an mdd copy of a poman n!{he abcva rdevenced uaad map.I:gaggi‘ntg'indé‘t‘aimgr‘?‘2§&m2£“§u§322$$$$§§§2$M lwa,Hogk,‘For kha lmwt prnauct lmnrmntlun chant Nsuarml Fla¢d InlulinceProgramnowmapschuckm9FEMAFlawstom‘at as,45 " 703060M mmfd‘mlrwwImlw-mhu.uw. IIA" milwwc‘ I-. rmuu-m Iuu‘mmw vmwnA-n _«t/ ‘V AV "54 -m‘.. '‘§kwammuVKV‘ ‘i‘ih f FUSS &O'NEEL INC.Consulting Engineers 146 HARTFORD ROAD,MANCHESTER.CONNEC‘HGJT O60“)860’6461469 www.FandO.mm BVERGREENWALKM DRAINAGEAREAS IIFESTYIEW mmwm noun t-n'savan; w GRAPHIC SCALE I “ESaim 82<Si 88o. go ‘sm ?§.i‘_g_a_§_lba.b.§f-§i iL:.§.§3§-....l§l:(.. ZEIB'itr‘uti 11‘s.; ng't'ne €T‘S 14-6 HARTFORD ROAD.MANCHES'IER.CONNECBGJT 06040 www.Fa1dOmn 860.646.2469 FUSS &O'NEILL INC.Consuuma E{o m DRAINAGE AREAS SOUTHWNNOR 1WW?mm WE .'5015 GRAPHIC SCALE raw}! a‘r £w 7.. j 4% $Y. . x: ‘.g \