HomeMy WebLinkAbout150 ABBE RDw
APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074(PHONE) 860444-2511 EXT. 230
DEPARTMENT DECISION
APPLICATION IS HEREBY:
APPROVED: BLDG.PERMIT NUMBER
DATE INSPECTOR
LOCATION OF WORK:
APPLICANT: OWNER: TYPE OF STRUCTURE:
f
NEW BUILDING
NAME: S i Ct JY U NAME: 2 E Vl D J Y1 c+A ) [I ADDITION
PHONE NUMBER nQ 971/-PHONE NUMBER ' ( ' g
p-
a I
STING BUILDING
ADDRESSI:a C Y4i ADDRESS: /SV 7 a
TYPE OF USE:
6 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
PLUMBING INFORMATION: FURTHERI DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
TYPE OF INSTALLATION:T r 1,N!U/J M ' 5 ' VV1t`J(C Al_n i w C uw}1q P
o
r ll-^+" f
NO.OF TOIETS: STYLE: NO.OF BATHTUBS: J 1`Fec c fi nil
NO.OF SHOWERS: NO.OF LAVATORIES:
Q nn
s k 1 (t
NO.OF CATCH BASINS: NO.OF FLOOR DRAINS: hieI. L V AA U u 1
ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY WINDOW?
YES oNO ESTIMATED COST: S
SIZE OF WINDOW: SIZE OF DUCTS:
SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK: FEE ENCLOSED:S
SIZE OF WATER PIPING AND RISER:
WATER HEATER: TYPE MANUFACTURER
FEE SCHEDULE:$18 PER S1,000 OF THE ESTIMATED COST.
ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROJECT IS
1.00 OVER (.26 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE INCLUDED AS PART
OF THE PERMIT FEE)
THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL
ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.: 3 TYPE: STATE: C
I
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE:r
APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 (PHONE)W"44-2511 EXT.230
DEPARTMENT DECISION PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICATION IS HEREBY: 7 ,!a---
APPROVED: BLDG.Pl RMU NUMBER
9 , A
DATE INSPECTOR
LOCATION OF WORK. I V N'I JJ li 1"YJ
APPLICANT: OWNER TYPE OF STRUCTURE:
GIL) Ojvrmt j A6Q-k,,)(ca$elV.
p
o NEW BUILDING
NAME: G he-vW %bw-ki NAME: lC rl CPyN ^ Sr 0ADDITION
PHONE NUMB R: O 6 a g 0 O 9,t&Z- PHONE NUMBER-
lt
IaD ^' BUILDING
ADDRESS: 0 0-3 LauI (tom AcDDRESS:1J V ub 6- 169
TYPE OF USE:
C- ap 0 L D U'I W 1 Nw-,wf G IJ
RESIDENTIAL o COMMERCIAL
11
HVAC INFORMATION: FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
e _
TYPE OF SYSTEM: HEATING 40C C.t illNkGv G L A1 4alkw 1
HEATING: C D` ( k/VC-w, 1 C.c l 11 r 3.S'[. Z`•4CE fe f L
TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH) T (HEAT LOSS SHEET REQUIRED)Al LH/ c
DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDE MAKE AND MODEL NO.):
ESTIMATED COST:fw
Q
AIR CONDTI7
DESIGN TEMP:OUTSIDE O+ °F iSIDE7]—'F DIFFERENCE 1 F' FEE ENCLOSED:S
v"
C)4
TOTAL HEAT GAIN MrMBY (HEAT GAIN SHEET REQUIRED)
DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUPMENT(INCLUDE MAKE AND MODEL NO.):
FEE SCHEDULE:Sib PER S1,000 OF THE ESTIMATED COST.
ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROJECT IS
1.00 OVER. (.26 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE INCLUDED AS PART
OF THE PERMIT FEE)
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMTI TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND
STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE: STATE: C
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE:
do 19 015-6 ({
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074(PHONE)860-644-2511 EXT.230
DEPARTMENT DECISION
PFRMLT NUMBER
APPLICA Y:
APPROVED: BLDG.PERMIT NUMB
DATE ECTOR
LOCATION OF WORK ` V o
APPLICANT: OWNER:TYPE OF STRUCTURE:
CY1r S GNIv6cl NEW BUILDING
NAME: 5eC 1.er gje,(- 'r)L L LL NAME: K, o ADDMON
PHONE NUMBER: C- 1' G 2"i 3 PHONE NUMBER:O ti 0• Ll z
J-E)aSTWG BUILDING
ADDRESS: 37 3 R c ADDRESS: Sy R
TYPE OF USE:
RESIDENTL4L co
ELECTRICAL INFORMATION: FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
TYPE OF INSTALLATION:: lC L C '`-n (4N'7
SIZE OF SERVICE: ?, U Gl M 2 n(/QI l I eCT V i(j v C b
SIZE OF MAIN SERVICE:
1 '
1'} ;y` y'j
2
NUMBER OF METERS: V S C S 3 7 6 CC CC
NUMBER OF PANELS:
NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS:ESTIMATED COST:S
NUMBER OF SWITCHES:
NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES: FEE ENCLOSED:
NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS:
FEE SCHEDULE• 18 PER$1, O THE ES FUKATED COST.
NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS:ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROJECT
IS SI.00 OVER (.26 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE INCLUDED AS
NUMBER OF OUTLETS: PART OF THE PERMIT FEE)
THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL
ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNETTCTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
T
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.: lid noo I L
I
TYPE: STATE:f
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: {A,A hjC /GI LY DATE: S"Z 1- 7()),1
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT(Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? YES Er NO
RESIDENTIAL CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY
BUSINESS
ASSEMBLE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY
EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE
FACTORY
STORAGE ADDRESS
GARAGE
O MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP
Other plus Vc,-Jp)
TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD Fv L C" ,.r-- • RyC .TES p L
SIZE OF SERVICE SIZE OF MAIN CONDUCTORS
NUMBERS OF METERS NUMBERS OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS
NUMBERS OF PANELS NUMBERS OF DISCONNECTS REQUIRED? YES 0 NO
NUMBERS OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER.CIRCUITS
NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS
NUMBER OFLIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUTTs
NUMBER'OF A IC CIRCUITS
SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMMD.
DESCRIP'ITON OF WORK
THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO
COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOR-
MANCE OF SUCH WORK
CT
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE 2?
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT
DEPARTMENT DECISION TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT#
Applic ereb BUILDING DEPARTMENT
APPRO 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE
644-251.1.ext. 230 Bldg:Permit#
Date ilding Inspector o
Application must be printed or typed
FEE SCHEDULE
F
Lo tGcn of Job:
0-$1,000=$15.00
Over$1,000=No. Street L,ot No.
15.00 per$1,000
or any fraction thereoft Designation Apt.No.P
APPLICANT J/9/q F'!C CZ a E/tc_&rc L
APPLICANT ADDRESS P O d oX 3S
yrrl CT a c
APPLICANT'S PHONE# yGG- 7 2/ 7 Y 7g
SOW N S
q
OWNER
OWNER ADDRESS
O F
OWNER PHONE
C ESTIMATED COST$ moo,
U IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? --*Yes No
14%V FEE ENCLOSED$ S .
TYPE OF JOB:t'I 3 y
SOR•CO VINew Installation
Alteration/Addition/Repair
76011
Revised 03/05/10
Electric # 150 Abbe Ro APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMITPlumbing#
HVAC# g g g , Date:
Sprinkler#
FINAL APPROVALS Estimated Cost $
Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee 7 Se'
Engineering Occupancy Fee $TYPE OF PRINT ONLYAffidavit Eng. Insp.Fee $
Appr.forCO. vir Mr. SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE rTotalFee7
TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,CT (Additional Cost) $
The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following:
Applicant 1R5cxt(*1y LocationofWork S Qa LotNo.
Applicant's Address a S 0 - Tel # 860 -Y 3 a -306n
Town c eS et' e Zip 060Y Lic.#
Owner Ke h 141 ZO V Architect
O•Swnoer'sL ddress a Architect's Address
TT00 &ASO T Zip 06 Q Z Zip
Sq.Ft. New Area: 1st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI.Tot I New Area
Purpose ot this permit 0o ,-4 OQ e r p- p1.
City Water Well Ll Septic System Sewer Q
Ins: HO rt.--Vn4 Area Basement Garage
Approved by ate Use Group Construction Type
Revised 1108
lectric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMITiumbing#
HVAC# Date: 5 f 9
Sprinkler#
FINAL APPROVALS Estimated Cost $ 191, o 00 .
Permit Fee yz DBuildingCOMPLETEREDBOXEDAREASOccupancyFee $Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $Affidavit
SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE tAppr.forCO.
Total Fee zl - a(o
TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT additional Cost) $
The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following:
Applicant A n reU nS4 I o Location of Work 1 S 0 4lo fie_ Lot No.
Applicant's Address !g%W c 1 St Tel # -AO-6 y 'S yp
Town (44:-.V%Ckes•1e,r ZipaC 0 Lic.#-S'C.. 0507Y07
Owner Architect 1
Owner's Address 1.50 AV,6,L R,L Architect's Address
I"rl W ti so r Zip zip- __
Sq. Ft. New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd Fl.Total New Area
Purpose of this permit Gr'yev%61'%j fmo^.-ho^ rf—p19cerv,e v
City Water J Well , Septic System J Sewer
Ins: HO SP t. —k!! Area Basement Garage
Approved by ca Date s &" 1 Use Group Construction Type
kz,/9 0 e aroe
I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of
South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this
permit is asked, and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required
distances from all other zones and is located in which this building and its use is allowed.
Signe
I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit.
Signed
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
INSPECTION COMMENTS
RESIDENTIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
77 MEAoovwlEW LANE,VERNON,CT 06066
860)8714830 •FAX(860)871-1393 • E-MAIL ResEng88@gmall.com
INSPECTIONS: HOME•COMMERCIAL•STRUCTURAL•TERMITE•RADON OWATER&WELL
DESIGN SERVICES:STRUCTURAL
WILLIAM F. NEAL, PE,CONSULTING ENGINEER
December 21,2016
Mr. Keith Dunnigan
150 Abbe Road
South Windsor,CT
Dear Mr. Dunnigan:
I visited your home at this address today for the specific purpose of conducting a visual
examination of the concrete foundation. Based on our conversation at the time, the house was
built in 1987 and you have occupied the home for approximately one week. Several days ago
water entered the basement through the foundation and you removed some of the drywall on the
finished basement walls to investigate. Behind the drywall you discovered cracked and
crumbling concrete.
The basement is approximately 50% finished,and one half of the rear wall has been
plastered,which gave us limited visual access to the interior of the foundation. I strongly
recommend that all of the drywall be removed so I can examine the rest of the foundation. The
exterior of the foundation has also been plastered except at the right side,where there are visible
cracks. The visible concrete foundation, both exterior and interior, has spider-web and horizontal
cracks and the foundation walls have turned a dark color. There are also sections of the
foundation wall that are spalling(crumbling). The foundation wall in at least one location is
bowing inward by as much as 3/4". Heavy efflorescence(a white powder from the concrete)is
present in many areas of the basement,especially in more heavily cracked areas.
The size, location, orientation,and nature of the cracks are consistent with deterioration
caused by, and indicate the presence of hotite in the aggregate used to make the concrete.
The defect typically causes this type of is ess be visible 15 to 20 years or more after the
foundation is poured. The defect will continue to deteriorate the concrete and the foundation
walls will very likely bulge inward until they structurally fail. There is no way to arrest the
process and there is no way to repair the existing damage. The foundation walls are structurally
unsound and corrective action is necessary. I do not recommend testing to determine what type
of defect is in fact causing the deterioration.Testing is very expensive and will not indicate a
different solution to the problem. It is my recommendation that the foundation walls and footings
be replaced. Based on its condition at this time,this foundation is a class 3 on the seven.1.findex
scale.
It is not possible to predict how quickly the foundation will deteriorate to the point it is
structurally dangerous.I therefore urge you to develop a corrective plan with a licensed
contractor as soon as possible. All work must be done with a Building Permit issued by the
Town of South Windsor Building Department.Photos are attached.
With your permission I am sending a copy of this report to Attorney Brenda Draghi.
Please let us know if there are any questions or ifwe can help in any other way.I am very
concerned about the condition of the foundation and what may happen in the near future. If the
condition of the foundation noticeably changes,it is imperative you contact me for further
evaluation. Thank you. We appreciate and value your business and your trust, and I sincerely
hope this problem comes to a successful and appropriate resolution very soon.
Sincerely,
w'&O' fAw
William F. Neal, PE
vaspF oott.y;P'..e
01 OM
r
jo-
NO. 11705
Page 2 of6
E N 1 STA 14 Industrial Drive East,Suite 2 Tou+m $98.782.3473
S.Deerfield,MA 01373 envistaforensics-com
FORENSICS
April 5, 2017
Mr. Leland Craver
Regional General Adjuster
Hanover Insurance Company
P.O. Box 15147
Worcester, MA 01615-0147
leraver@hanover.com
Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Hanover File Number: 15-00889280
Envista File No: MAT-60455-W6138
Subject: Letter of Findings
Mr. Craver:
Per your request, PT&C1LWG Forensic Consulting Services(PT&CILWG), now known as.Envista';
Forensics, conducted a site visit on January 10, 2017 to investigate the cause of the:reported
foundation damage at the Dunnigan property located at 150 Abbe Road, South Windsor;
We are forwarding the results of our site visits, our review of available background,...'
and our associated engineering review of the observed foundation damage for your consideration.r•,;F:,, m ,
and use.
CAUSE OF DAMAGE s
Based on a reasonable degree of engineering certainty, our opinion is that the observed'`
foundation damage and distress is due to a chemical reaction with the aggregate(sand.an stone):`
used in the original concrete mix. The chemical reaction is associated with the oxidation* f.the::;:.>_;=:;,;-.. :;:,
pyr_rhot it mineral present in the concrete. Additional details and information may be found in the'. :=
a at' khed report from my colleague, Anthony J. Papa, P.E. (Attachment 1) .and Ste.ven...J:3 :;
Stokowski, P.G. (Attachment 2).
CLOSURE
This Letter of Findings is for the exclusive use of our client and is:.nof:intended`for:any other €=
purpose. Our report is based on information made available to us at this`time;:Should additional>:
information become.available, we reserve the right to determine-:the impact,,.l.any, of:the.:new!
information on our opinionsand conclusions..and.to revise our,:opinions:and:'conclusions;:•:if
necessaryand warranted b the discovery of additional information::;:;:Y rY
CERTAINTY IN AN UNCERTAIN WORLD
EN ISTA Page2of2
Envista File No: MAT-64455-W6P8
FORE KS 1 C 5 Hanover Insurance File No: Claim No. 15-00889280
Thank you for allowing us to provide this service. If you have any questions or need additional
assistance, please call me.
Sincerely,
PT&CILWG Forensic Consulting Services
J.
1-Awow,tL
G. Daniel Gagaris, P.E.
Project Manager
Attachments
Attachment 1) Report by Anthony J. Papa, P.E., dated March 30, 2017
Attachment 2) Report by Steven J. Stokowski, P.G., dated March 14, 2017
EN 1 STA 14 Industrial Drive East ou-FREE 888.782-3473
FORENSICS
S.Deerfield,MA 01373 envistaforensics.com
Y s
March 30, 2017
n..
57lr.!
Mr. G. Daniel Ga aris, P.E.
Principal Consultant
Envista Forensics
14 Industrial Drive East, Suite 2
South Deerfield, MA 01373 r'
Insured: Chi Dunnigan rf tn
Project:150 Abbe Road, South Windsor, CT
Subject: Hanover Claim No. 15-00889280 na,`';t:
Envista File No: 60455-W6P8
Mr. Gagaris, 4^' ...
On January 10, 2017, Envista Forensics (Envista) inspected the property of Chi Dunnigan located at` -r;
150 Abbe Road, South Windsor, CT. This letter contains Envista's findings and conclusions reached ?r '
as a result of.that inspection and review of available information.
r
PURPOSE
The Hanover Insurance Group retained Envista to assess the reported foundation damage. Specifically,
Envista was requested to review the subject property to determine the cause of distress noted:. in
the cast-in-place concrete foundation and to obtain core samples of the concrete from the foundation in
order to test the quality of the concrete. The Owner, Mr. Dunnigan, and Mr. Leland Carver::(
Property Adjuster for The Hanover Insurance Group) were present during my visit.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The referenced project is an existing two-story, single-family residential'structure. In accdrdance
with public record, the house was.on InaIty constructed circa 1987. Mr. Dunnigan just recently
purchased then house lest than a month from the time of our visit. We estimate the house
encompasses approximately2,450 square-feet.
The house is situated on the east side of Abbe Road with the front facing',west—The;grade around
the residence is relatively flat with a mild slope from west to east. The property in front of the house
does exhibit a mild slope toward the front of the home. There is a small riere runs to the north
and east sides of the house called the Podunk River. There does appear."to be some water
infiltration through cracking within the foundation wall on the west side ofthe horse
Mr. Dunnigan indicated that he did have a home inspector conduct an inspection of the house prior
to his purchase and the report did not indicate unusual distress within the foundation.''The report
specifically stated that "small foundation cracks observed, but no pattern cracking observed". Mr.
Dunnigan indicated that he noticed unusual cracking within the foundation.during the process of
purchasing the home, but indicated that he was assured by. his 11omejnspector that the cracking
CERTAINTY.'IN'AN UNCERTAIN WORLD y r..:.:•:. ra:
P73C Corrh'—.5c 1m.PA.I T;F6m Regkwwlo #F-9190 I NC Finn RepLPrafl n C-28370E!'ti55i
r
E N 1 STA Page 2 of 9
FORENSICS Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
was not unusual. Subsequent to the purchase of the home, Mr. Dunnigan had the foundation
reviewed by a structural engineer, Mr. William Neal, PE. Mr. Neal's report indicates that based on
visual observation, the foundation distress is the result of a chemical reaction resulting from
incompatible materials used in the concrete mix.
The Owner noted that the cracks perpetuate in random patterns both vertically, horizontally, and
diagonally. Mr. Dunnigan also became aware of issues associated with deteriorating foundations as
a result of a chemical reaction that is occurring within several foundations in the northeast portion of
the state of CT from various news reports.
OBSERVATIOMS
My observations are briefly described below. Please note that my review included a visual review of
exposed areas of the cast-in-place concrete foundation as well as the results of petrographic
examination of core samples taken from select areas of the foundation. The area where core
samples were taken was typically selected where distress was noted (see key plan and photos
below). It should be noted that the results of the petrographic examination provide information of the
concrete where the samples were taken only and the results may not be consistent throughout the
foundation. Not all existing conditions and as-built construction can be understood without
destroying otherwise adequate or serviceable portions of the structure, building envelope, and
finishes.
During my visit to the referenced property, Mr. Dunnigan pointed out the noted distress within the
concrete walls of the foundation as well as the garage walls. Mr. Dunnigan indicated that he did not
notice any serviceability issues with his house such as doors or windows that do not work properly.
The existing foundation wall measures 10-inches thick and the foundation wall is approximately 7-
foot, 5-inches in height above the finished basement floor slab. We noted several random map
cracks within the foundation wall from both the exterior side and interior side (see photos below).
The size of the cracks range in size from relatively hairline with the larger cracks being 1/84nch to
3/16-inch wide at the time of our visit. The concrete floor slab within the basement also exhibited
similar random map cracking noted within the foundation walls, although less noticeable visually.
We also noted that the exterior side of the foundation was treated with what appears to be a
cementitious parging or similar material, and portions of the interior side of the foundation also
exhibits a cementitious coating (see photos below). This coating may have been applied by the
previous Owner.
The characteristics of the cracking suggest a chemical reaction resulting in deterioration of the
concrete in lieu of an issue associated with shrinkage cracking, accidentalIstructural loadings,
corrosion of embedded metals, freeze thaw, differential settlement, and/or design error. Two core
samples were extracted from the foundation wall and one core same was extracted from the
basement floor slab for petrographic analysis.
PETROGRAPHIC RESULTS SUMMARY
The concrete core samples taken from the foundation on January 10, 2617 were sent to TEC
Services located in Lawrenceville, GA for petrographic examination. Please refer to the key plan
and photos below for more details about the core samples. Petrographic analysis is a method of
E N 1 STA Page 3 of 9
FORENSICS Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
identifying issues associated with concrete such as durability, low strength, freeze-thaw, cracking,
chemical reactions, fire damage, etc. Petrographic analysis makes use of microscopes to examine
samples of concrete to determine their mineralogical and chemical characteristics. Suitable
surfaces (either polished or thin sections) are prepared by sawing, lapping, and polishing. The
samples are examined through a petrological (geological polarizing) microscope, using either
reflected or transmitted light.
Please refer to the results of the petrographic analysis prepared by TEC Services attached to this
report. The results of the testing as it relates to the noted distress within the foundation can be
summarized as follows:
The concrete used for the foundation and basement floor slab appears to be of relatively
poor quality from the time of construction. The concrete was not air entrained and the
water/cement ratio appears to be very high. Air entrainment is used with concrete subject to
freeze-thaw as the microscopic air cells introduced into the concrete at the time of batching
relieve internal pressure by providing tiny chambers for water to expand into when it freezes.
Regarding water/cement ratio, the higher the ratio, the less durable the concrete.
The concrete of the basement floor slab has a fine aggregate particle affected by ASR
alkali silica reaction). However, this was noted to have not damaged the concrete.
P rrrh content within the aggregate within the foundation walls and basement floor slab
is unusually high. Pyrrhotite is a naturally occurring mineral in various types of rock.
However, the mineral is unstable and oxidizes when exposed to oxygen and water. The
oxidation of the mineral causes internal expansive pressure within the concrete, which
results in random cracking.
PHOTOGRAPHS
J% 3r.{ •'::•..; ',t;;rrr ras:." r4,Y{a.
Photo 1: Cementitious coating / patching on Photo 2: Cementitious coating patching on
foundation wall. foundation wall.
E STA Page 4 of 9
70 RE N s i c s - Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
L 'V
a -
h 1.T'"!? lire t F 1 r'"'4 "t•y
11x 1 S
Photo 3: Cementitious coating patching on
foundation wall. Photo 4: Horizontal cracking in foundation wall.
t
e
q
Photo S: Cementitious coating on foundation wall. Photo 6: Cementitious coating on foundation wall.
r
Photo 7: Cementitious coating on interior side of
Photo 8: Core sample W 1.foundation wall.
E N 1 STA Page 5 of 9
F O R E N S I C S Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
7 Y
Photo 7: Random map cracking - interior. Photo 8: Random map cracking - interior.
k
Photo 7: Random map cracking - interior.
Photo 8: Random map cracking—floor at Core
sample F1.
9'
Photo 7: Basement looking south. Photo 8: Core F1.
E N 1 STA Page 6 of 9
FORENSICS Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
II
II
II
II
II
Q ll
c
1: r=
10'-roll
f
13MeMENT
El: 40 -5
a-
rl-'MDUNNIGANS fi ENCE PLAN
5K-d
E N 1 S TA Page 7 of 9
F O e t N S I C S Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
CORE SAMPLES:
C l
r' A -../ ++ Yr 4r .. t:M ',x3 g;f4 f''.:i
I
Photo 1:Core sample El. Photo 2: Core sample El.
Tr:77 7-
Photo 3: Core sample W1.Photo 4: Core sample W1.
t
Photo 5: Core sample F1. Photo 6: Core sample Fl.
EN 1 STA Page 8 of 9
FORE H S I CS Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
CONCLUSIONS
After conducting an inspection at the subject property located at 150 Abbe Road in South Windsor, CT
and review of available information, it is Envista's professional opinion that:
The distress observed within the foundation of the referenced property is due to a chemical reaction
associated with the aggregate (sand and stone) used in the concrete mix. The chemical reaction is
associated with oxidation of the pyrr rhfife mineral present as it is exposed to oxygen and water. The
oxidation causes expansive pressure(tensile stress) that the concrete has limited ability to resist, which
results in the random map cracking. Concrete is an excellent building material for the resistance of
compression stress, but has limited capacity to resist tensile stresses.
This type of deterioration of the concrete has been a known issue for decades. In the interest of quality
control, aggregates used for concrete are tested for injurious amounts of organic impurities or minerals
that are deleteriously reactive before use. However, this testing was often not performed and/or
enforced for single-family residential construction. This type of distress is rarely seen in commercial
construction projects where review of materials, testing, and inspection programs are routinely
conducted pre-construction and during the construction phase, and are typically enforced by
engineers/architects and local building departments. Review of concrete mix designs along with
material certifications for aggregates proposed for use within the mix design are part of this commercial
pre-construction review process.
It should be noted that the foundation of the house is currently not in a state of collapse. However,there
remains a large percentage of pyrrhotite mineral that is not completely oxidized and the remaining
pyrrhotite has the potential to cause additional deterioration of the concrete foundation.
Unfortunately, there is no known repair for this type of concrete deterioration caused by the chemical
reaction of the pyrrhotite mineral other than removal and replacement of the concrete foundation
containing the unstable material.
EN 1 STA Page 9 of 9
FORENSICS Insured: Chi Dunnigan
Envista Matter No: 60455-W6P8
Hanover Insurance Claim No: 15-00889280
CLOSURE
This report is for the exclusive use of our client and is not intended for any other purpose. Our
report is based on information made available to us at this time. Should additional information
become available, we reserve the right to determine the impact, if any, of the new information on
our opinions and conclusions and to revise our opinions and conclusions if necessary and
warranted by the discovery of additional information.
Thank you for allowing us to provide this service. If you have any questions or need additional
assistance, please call.
Sincerely,tt:a rfrnf
Envista Forensics 4 o14
r/nthonyv J. Papa, PE e:;s
AssociateJil`;, `.
Attachment: Petrographic Evaluation Report by TEC Services
Electric'# APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMITPlumbing#
150 Abbe Rol
HVAC# Dtite: G 3 li
Sprinkler# Estimated Cost $FINAL APPROVALS Permit Fee 7BuildingCOMPLETEREDBOXEDAREASOccupancyFee $Engineering TYPE OF PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $Affidavit
Appr.forCO. SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE
Total Fee S
TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $
The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following:
Applicant Ate Y P y Location of Work a Lot No.
Applicant's Addr s a S 0, Tel # 60 Y 3 a 306
Town Gf' P rAAef_ C Zip Lic.#Q3
Owner h l"` 4 ZO S' Architect
Owner's ddress Wkb P PtO 1 Architect's Address
Zip—a 0-'7 Zip
Sq.Ft.New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI.Tot I New Area
Purpose o this permit 0 o ilk O V c r-
AA
City Water Well J Septic System 0 Sewer
Ins: HO Area Basement Garage
Approved by ate Use Group Construction TypeZ7lv fRevised 1108
I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of
South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this
permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper di tance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required
distances from all other zones and is located in w is buil n d i se is allowed.
Signed
I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work de abed in this application for the permit.
Signed
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINF
INSPECTION COMMENTS
INSPECTION FIELD SHEET O1/12/12
Printed by Peart, Dayshell 09 18 08
INSPECTION: 40297 FINAL PERMIT:
STATUS:
APPLICATION: 201100582
LOCATION: 150 ABBE ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR
PROPERTY ID: 00600150
OWNER: MAZOTAS KENNETH R & LYNNE G
CONTRACTOR:
REQUEST BY:
DESCRIPTION: ROOFING OVER EXISTING LAYER OF SHINGLES AND INSTALL RIDGE
WORK ORDER:
INSPECTOR: ROSE RESULT: PASS
REQUESTED: 12/09/11 PRIORITY:
SCHEDULED: 12/09/11 AM COMPLETED: 12/09/11
UNPAID FEES: 00 Date Time
TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE
COMMENTS
LooO PL.rti1 EbrnT
Tn'CowN oC SouTN
Y
ca
J r
Q N
4 2to s,
S`cTnNk
O .
Z g8,240.3
Z,o., I..oT C:
v za.`z,v 0
O2io.o
2. 2yo xo
4' Z
ol
1
c
240,E 2-Ic•8 240.5
2'W.4 240•239.6 j
ago tno.,.33Z.c.4 P
242.ia i
Aae on.o
MORTGAGE SURVEY
LOT 'C' - ABBE:_ ROAD
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECT&UT
SCALE: 1" = 40 '
I hereby certify that the location of the building as shown is
o _0 substantially correct and that there are no zoning violations
of the same.
0 CLASS D
rv (U
W L.S . #10839
DATE: May 5, 1986
o .s REFERENCE: Re-Subdivision Property of Herman Maskel Abbe RoadV)0, South Windsor, Conn. Emil W. Lucek Associates South Windsor ,
a o _ Conn. Scale 1" = 40 ' Date 12-10-79 Revisions 2-13-80 6-16-80
7-17-80 7-28-80 4-9-81 5-12-81
CLASS D
THIS MAP IS COMPILED FROM OTHER MAPS , DEED DIMENSIONS AND OTHER
o . o SOURCES OF INFORMATION, NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ACCURATE SURVEY
0 > AND SUBJECT TO FINAL CHANGES AS A MORE ACCURATE SURVEY MAY DISCLOSE."
W .0 i
GARDNER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES
Z
Or `M TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT
ppRo..._ ..__ _.
TO`!NOff' SOUTHWIf:17SOR
GINEERINDPART(,TENT
DATE
SIG.%
yV
ik.9q
6j'
OF Maske)
or),er vc(1-i ov) Eo6cme-ni)
r.
HAY BAIaE APPLICATIONS it /' . I 1 ` '
Sheet Flow Applications woll
1 . Bales shall be placed in a single row, lengthwise on the contour , i , 2-s0.00'
with ends of adjacent bales tightly abutting one another .
1 J f
J 11 FLOOD PL A1N
2 . All bales shall be either wire-bound or string-tied. Bales shall
be installed so that bindings are oriented around the sides rather TOwf1
J / r
1` N or- SOVTff (/t,/N D502
than along the tops and bottoms of the bales to prevent deteriation
of the bindings .
1
shallbarriershallbeentrenchedandbackfilled. A trench sa3. The
be excavated the width of a bale and the length of the proposed
barrier to a minimum depth of 4 inches. After the bales are staked
and chinked, the excavarted soil shall be backfilled against the
barrier. Backfill soil shall conform to the ground level on the
downhill side and shall be built up t.e 4 inches against the uphill
ideally, bales should be placed 10 feet away Asideofthebarrier . y,
from the toe of slope.
4 . Each bale shall be securely anchored by at least two stakes or
rebars driven through the bale. The first stake in each bale shall O
I z
be driven toward the previously laid bale to force the bales together.
Stakes or re.-bars shall be driven deep enough into the ground to uL
securely anchor the bales. 0 r
o
5 . The gaps between bales shall be chinked (filled by wedging) with
straw to prevent water from escaping between the bales . (Loose I I
Q
w scattered over the area immediately uphill from a straw bale
HAv (
71PJC
1
straw 4i
barrier tends to increase barrier efficiency. ) In sloping areas 1
O J
the bale line perpendicular bale checkswheresurfaceflowfollows
1 N
shall be installed at appropriate intervals ( 100 feet- Maximum) . i' '
0 3Z
LAJ
6 . Inspection shall be frequent. and repair or replacement shall be
1
made promptly as needed.
7 . Bale barriers shall be removed when they have served their usefulness, p T O sZ ' zyo V)
but not before the upslope areas have been permanently stabilized.
oo ' -'Proposed House
O GARAGE
O
LZ
1
Co.rCRETE I. b'S'
zo.Joo rmouvrrt&nJ T 1 337•
N S 3'- as - COO E
s 3d1' E_
1ti°0 230 232 23yZ Z38 d40
242 OA DAggER
PLAN LEGEND
c.a le, 0'oo.
a EXISTING ELEVATION
S 1 "= Z
o xNOTES
o PROPOSED ELEVATION
1 . Soil Testing by Town of South Windsor . Leo -- - - _- -- __ _ .- .-- - --- -- - _ -- _ - - - - - _ zLto Ioo EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
2 . Design based on a 4 bedroom house and a percolation rate in the EDGE PAVEMENT
range of 10 min. / inch. PROPERTY LINE
3 . Provide a 1250 gallon concrete septic tank and 3 leaching trenches Fr: z38.s' R= 23a5' 3$'s S BUILDING SEWER PIPEgQ;.
75 feet long by 36 inches wide - 225 lin. ft. , or 675 sq. ft. of 238 Za SOLID PIPE
leaching area. Provide a footing drain as shown. Drain is to PEFORATED PIPE
outlet on the ground surface a shown. Outlet to be screened again:>t OVERFLOW PIPE
rodents .F FOOTING DRAIN
4 . House sewer to be 4" I .D. extra heavy cast iron pipe , with bell C - - - CURTAIN DRAIN
spigot joints - leaded or equal , set at a min . slope of 4" per W WATER L INE
lin. ft . STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
CATCH BASIN
5 . Level distx _bution - trenches to be set level at elevations shown
and ends of trenches to be connected as shown.FIN. FLOOR= 243.0 ' SAC I ION - DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERCOLATION TEST
O TEST HOLE
6 . Construction area to be loamed and seeded . Final grade area to EE SEPTIC TANK
shed surface water. FIN. GRADE
FIN. GRADE Scale HorZ: 1": 10'DISTRIBUTION BOX
7 . Elevations shown are based on an assumed datum. The benchmark OVERFLOW BOX
shown (elevation 242 . 80) is top of concrete monument as established j Veri : I ` Z
by the field survey.
8 COVER( MIN )
S . No in-ground fuel tank is to be within 75 feet of a well .
p
J LAYER OF HAY OR UNTREATED BUILDING PAPER
MAP IS NOT A BOUNDARY SUR4'= Y. Property information shown
BUILDING SEWER
TO LOWER TRENCH_—
y
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DESIGN
9 . THIS p y 3„SOLID PIPE 2'
2' MIN.;<
j
is based on Resubdivision Property of Herman Maskel , Abbe Road ,
o 0 0 4" DIA PERFORATED PIPE o ° °
LIQUID LEVEL 12"MIN.
2 LYNN MAZOTAS
South Windsor Ct. By Emil W. Lucek Associates. Revised to 5-12-81 . .
u
SOLID PIPE BACK FILLED BBINV= 139.5 INV.= Z38--1 0 I BROKEN STONE OR I SCREENED GRAVEL' - WITH SOIL (NOT STONE) ABBE ROAD
INV= 2YO-Z NOT LESS THAN 3/4"' a NOT MORE THAN 2 .
10 . It is recommended that the town sanitarian be ont.acted before s" COMPACTED SAND t6 COMPACTED SAND SOUTH WINDSOR, CT.
any Site work is performed . OR GRAVEL
BOTTOM TO BE SET LEVEL OR GRAVEL
EXTRA HEAVY CAST OVERFLOW BOX
IRON PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL 12so GAL. SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTION BOX
LEACHING TRENCH
WHERE SPECIFIED )
GARDNER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES
REVISIONS 576 OLD POST ROAD
BIZq/g TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT
L.A.NO suRVe,YOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL DISTRIBUTION go By RJT SCALE DATE SHEET NO. MAP N0.
t o
NOT TO SCALE 1vU1 ER HPT AS SHovN I OF I 6926
v0
JOSEPH MERRITT i CO. 19 1253
1
27
N/F Mas 61
Cco SGrVGIT,O+' CaSe meV)1
HAY BAIjE APPLICATIONS
i
Sheet Flow Applications
1. Bales shall be placed in a single row, lengthwise on the contour,
with ends of adjacent bales tightly abutting one another.
2 . All bales shall be either wire-bound or string-tied. Bales shall FLOOD PLANii ,' i '
be installed so that bindings are oriented around the sides rather
than along the tops and bottoms of the bales to prevent deteriation of SO!/TH WINpSpRofthebindings .
3 . The barrier shall be entrenches: and backfilled. A trench shall
be excavated the width of a bale and the length of the proposed
barrier to a minimum depth of 4 inches . After the bales are staked 20
and chinked, the excavarted soil shall be backfilled against the r '
barrier . Backfill soil shall canfcrm to the ground level on the
downhill side and shall be built_ up to 4 inches against the uphill
side of the barrier. Ideally, bales should be placed 10 feet away O yE.y Z30
from the toe of slope. J
O4 . Each bale shall be securely anchored by at least two stakes or vp I
rebars driven through the bale. The first stake in each bale shall
be driven toward the previously laid bale to force the bales together.
22y, i'/ I iStakesorre-bars shall be driven deep enough into, the ground to P
securely anchor the bales. o`-
1
5 . The gaps between bales shall be chinked ( filled by wedging) with 9 3
straw to prevent water from escaping between the bales . (Loose i 1
straw scattered over the area immediately uphill from a straw bale HAv gAzEs p0 Q
barrier tends to increase barrier efficiency. ) In sloping areas N
where surface flow follows the bale line, perpendicular bale checks
shall be installed at appropriate intervals (100 feet Maximum) . r N
6 . Inspect.ion shall be frequent and repair or replacement shall be
made promptly as needed.
7 . Bide barriers shall be removed when ttrey have served their usefulness ,
but not before the upslope areas have been permanently stabilized. 240
n7 N
i
I
ProposeJouse.
TW=2y2.o
S5 MT-z35..S- d
10
MY. COWCRC-Te
ZS•- 00 E_
r
LLo
Z4
zyz Lyv
AggE RoAp
PLAN- LEGEND
N O T E S
1 .
loo•
a EXISTING ELEVATIONSoil 'Testing by Town of South Windsor. xo PROPOSED ELEVATION2'o z tv EXISTING CONTOUR2 . Design based on a 4 bedroom house and a percolation rate in the
range of 10 min. / inch. PROPOSED CONTOUR
EDGE PAVEMENT
3 . Provide a 1250 gallon concrete septic tank and 3 leaching trenches
FL: 238.s' 23as Fk_ 238.s PROPERTY LINE75feetlongby36incheswide = 225 lin. ft . , or 675 sq. ft_ of 1'Q: n:: BUILDING SEWER PIPEleachingarea . Provide a footing drain as shown. Drain is to 23S 39 SOLID PIPEoutlet. on the ground surface a shown. Outlet to be screened against t
rodents . PEFORATED PIPE
e OVERFLOW PIPE
4 . House sewer to be 4" I .D. extra heavy cast iron pipe, with bell F FOOTING DRAINspigotjoints - leaded or equal , set at a min . slope of per C - - - CURTAIN DRAINlin. ft .
W WATER L INE
Level distributic r. - trenches to be set level at elevations shown STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
and ends of trenc~:es to be connected as shown. CATCH BASIN
6 .
FIN FLOOR= 243.0 SEC I ION - DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERCOLATION TESTConstructionareatobeloamedandseeded. Fir al grade area to TEST HOLEshedsurfacewater .
seeded.
SEPTIC TANKFIN. GRADE Scale7 . Elevations shown are based an an assumed datum. The benchmark FIN. GRADE Horz: 1 'z 10'11 DISTRIBUTION BOX/
F
shown (elevation 242 .80) is tap of concrete monument as established Verl Z OVERFLOWLOW BOXbythefieldsurvey.
8 . No in-ground fuel tank is to be within 75 feet of a well . s"cOVER( MIN )
LAYER OF HAY OR UNTREATED BUILDING PAPER
9 . TH1S MAP IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. Property information Shown BUILDING SEWER 2 TO LOWER TRENCH 1^^^
is based on Resubdivision PropF,rty of ?i'rnlan Maskel , Abbe Road , 3 SOLID PIPE 2
0 4 DIA. PERFORATED PIPE o 0 0 FACE DISPOSAL DESIGN
LIQUID LEVEL 2" LYNN MAZOTAS
South Windsor Ct . By Emil W. LUCE?k ASf OC'iatES . Revised t.i7 5-12-81 . . r12 MIN.
SOLID PIPE BACKFILLEOINV = Z39.5 INV.= 238. 1 1" BROKEN STONE OR I" SCREENED GRAVEL
ABBE ROAD10 . It is recommended that. the town sanitarian be contacted before INV= 2Y-Z
NOT LESS THAN 3/4"' B NOT MORE THAN 2
WITH SOIL (NOT STONE)
6 COMPACTED SANDanysiteworkisperformed.BOTTOM TO BE SET LEVEL 6 COMPACTED SAND SOUTH WINDSOR, CT.OR GRAVEL OR GRAVEL
EXTRA HEAVY CAST
IRON PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL 12s0 GAL. SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTION BOX OVERFLOW BOX
WHERE SPECIFIED)
LEACHING TRENCH
WHERE
PETERSON ASSOCIATESREVISIONS
S Zqf 8
576 OLD POST ROAD
TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT
LANDSUBSURFACEDISPOSALDISTRIBUTION SURVEYOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS
NOT TO SCALE PC C F-G+az BY RTT SCALE DATE SHEET N0. MAP NO.
EGA NEER HPT AS SHOVN 15/85 OF I 6926
f JOSEPH MERRITT a Co. 19 1253
11, -
N/'F- ANNA MOSEs l ASKE 1.
To'TowK oS' So.•
Z
C
LCACHING E..LO
3 Y o r .415.4
2A2.Z.1'
1 G•F'.241.5 Z.W• N
H
r3 ar ?.c 21.L• •+,
N••'_IS 1•_fe•Z-_Le.t
J u 9t.0 o. yRe Au
2 e, Zie•2i0•$
i39.d 2ic,.
WELL.
E)
4
ZbA Meg..
I'
33Z.C.'1-
c,
242.0
Aa E RaAo
KNIN!
MORTGAGE SURVEY
LOT 'C' - ABBE'. ROAD
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTLUT
SCALE: 1" = 40'
I hereby certify that the location of the building as shown is
substantially correct and that there are no zoning violationsofthesame.
y '` CLASS D
AUG 0 4 1986
South Windsor
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TO M SOLO 16 DEPT. TOWN OF SOUTH MIINDSOit
Thb4ortftled that this plan and specifications aretsale
8111114" Ot It" proposed bufldfng or aiteratioas to be
ad at
5"D d b'p--Ro.4,_ Strew
tOMther with rr ..'d._n m x olicrtioh and
ith pi 2Anins.
and al t - r:• rs a shill 0W
luued by the ; ., a ,l ring pandenav
40 this appll0otl,,n ;,—I ce of a buHdlft
MQN.
do With n„r d,ti-gin that
e/MM an r f- L.ai:;,W shall 6a
ellawled a t"
MeMBNnelly Appr,ved Thase filed w{th
Wldltld inspector C ferk
Me 1(O'Z
1900267 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT
DATE: 05/15/2019
GIS ID:00600150 FEE:47.06
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201900874 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT LOCATION
NAME:ANDREW ANSALDI COMPANY ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: 186 BIDWELL STREET,OWNER: DUNNIGAN KEITH JR&
150 ABBE ROAD
MANCHESTER,CT 06040
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPLACE DAMAGED FOUNDATION
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY IE DGPARTMENT.
1
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDIgG OFFICIAL
5/15/2019 1 1:19 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE
11000251 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT
DATE: 06/13/11
GIS ID: 00600150 FEE:75.00
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201100582 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT LOCATION
NAME: BAILEY HOME IMPROVEMENTS ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: 262 OAK STREET OWNER: MAZOTAS KENNETH R&LYNNE G
MANCHESTER,CT 06040, 150 ABBE ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: ROOFING OVER EXISTING LAYER OF SHINGLES AND INSTALL RIDGE
VENT.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL
6/13/2011 1:20 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE
1900452 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER HVAC PERMIT
DATE: 07/29/2019
GIS ID:00600150 FEE:72.00
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201901564 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT - , LOCATION
NAME:NUTMEG MECHANICAL SERVICES,INC.ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: 130-3 UTOPIA ROAD OWNER: DUNNIGAN KEITH JR&
150 ABBE ROAD
MANCHESTER,CT 06042
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REMOVE FURNACE FOR FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT
REPLACE AC
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL
7/29/2019 4:06 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE
1900452 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER HVAC PERMIT
DATE: 07/29/2019
G1S ID:00600150 FEE:72.00
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201901564 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT LOCATION
NAME:NUTMEG MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: 130-3 UTOPIA ROAD OWNER: DUNNIGAN KEITH JR&
150 ABBE ROAD
MANCHESTER,CT,06042
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REMOVE FURNACE FOR FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT
REPLACE AC
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL
7/29/2019 4:06 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE
1900218 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER ELECTRICAL PERMIT
DATE: 06/14/2019
GIS ID:00600150 FEE: 0.52
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201900874 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT LOCATION
NAME:BECKER ELECTRIC,LLC ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: 373 PLAINS ROAD OWNER: DUNNIGAN KEITH JR&
150 ABBE ROAD
COVENTERY,CT 06238
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPLACE DAMAGED FOUNDATION
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:DISCONECT&RECONNECT ELECTRICAL
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY ;
A;
RTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDIN OFFICIAL
6/14/2019 3:18 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE
1700251 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
PERMIT NUMBER ELECTRICAL PERMIT
DATE: 08/07/2017
GIS ID:00600150 FEE:15.00
MUNIS APPLICATION# 201700998 BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT LOCATION
NAME: DANA DEPERCIO ELECTRIC INC. ADDRESS: 150 ABBE ROAD
ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 735 OWNER: DUNNIGAN KEITH JR&
ROCKY HILL,CT 06067 150 ABBE ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: WIRE FOR SEWER INJECTION PUMP WITH NEW 20 AMP CIRCUIT.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL
8n12017 3:25 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE