The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About28 MAIN ST 04/08/2005 FRI 12:43 FAX 860 644 7280 South Windsor Town Hall 0001 ********************* *** FAX TX REPORT *** ********************* TRANSMISSION OK JOB 110. 3941 DESTINATION ADDRESS 96671430 PSWD/SUBADDRESS DESTINATION ID ST. TIME 04/08 12:42 USAGE T 00' 44 PGS. 1 RESULT OK fA ° r Town op So� %2&opt 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 �Osoa•co� TELEPHONE(860)644-2511 John T.Cortese April 7,2005 Village Park Inc. 28 Main Street South Windsor,Cr 06074 Re:Electrical Inspection/Permit# 19297 Dear I&Cortese, As accurately referenced in your letter to the Department of Consumer Protection,dated January 21,2005,I inspected worm associated with permit#19297. Prior to March 22,2005.my office received a phone call from Newington Electric stating an electrical inspector from this office made a statement as you alleged in your complaint. On March 22,2005,I spoke with Lynda Macha from Newington Electric Company for information on this matter.She stated from a copy of your complaint that I made a reference to the charges for their worm I assured her that neither I nor any inspector in this office has the authority or the right to-consider anything outside of code related issues. Shortly thereafter,I spoke with you.You stated no recollection that I made such a comment and that it was not in the complaint of January 21,2005.Since I had not seen a copy of this complaint,I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Since that phone call I have seen a copy of the complaint and it indeed contains such a comment in the postscript. I would accept your written correction to the complaint,dated January 21,2065,reflecting an accurate account of my inspection.Your complaint as stands is flawed , r L At0~N •t4 c7— C.1 • V -Own O-P Sotl',A Z ti 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 Solt-co`' TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 John T. Cortese April 7,2005 Village Park Inc. 28 Main Street South Windsor,Cr 06074 Re:Electrical Inspection/Penmit# 19297 Dear Mr. Cortese, As accurately referenced in your letter to the Department of Consumer Protection,dated January 21,2005,I inspected work associated with permit#19297. Prior to March 22,2005 my office received a phone call from Newington Electric stating an electrical inspector from this office made a statement as you alleged in your complaint. On March 22,2005,I spoke with Lynda Marha from Newington Electric Company for information on this matter.She stated from a copy of your complaint that I made a reference to the charges for their work I assured her that neither I nor any inspector in this office has the authority or the right to consider anything outside of code related issues. Shortly thereafter,I spoke with you.You stated no recollection that I made such a comment and that it was not in the complaint of January 21,2005.Since I had not seen a copy of this complaint,I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Since that phone call I have seen a copy of the complaint and it indeed contains such a comment in the postscript. I would accept your written correction to the complaint,dated January 21,2005, reflecting an accurate account of my inspection.Your complaint as stands is flawed. Sin 1 Christoph J.Dougan Chief B 'ding Officaial Cc Lynda Marha,Newington Electric Company Department of Consumer Protection 04/08/2005 FRI 12:44 FAX 860 644 7280 South Windsor Town Hall 0001 , ********************* *** FAX TX REPORT *** ********************* TRANSMISSION OR JOB NO. 3942 DESTINATION ADDRESS 97137239 PSWD/SUBADDRESS DESTINATION ID ST. TIME 04/08 12:43 USAGE T 00' 20 PGS. 1 RESULT OR u ti 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 ~OsoR.co�'`� TELEPHONE(860)644-2511 John T.Cortese April 7,2005 Village Park Inc. 28 Main Street South Windsor,CT 06074 Re:Electrical Inspection/Permit# 19297 Dear Mr.Cortese, As accurately referenced in your letter to the Department of Consumer Protection,dated January 21,2005,I inspected work associated with permit#19297. Prior to March 22,2005 my office received a phone call from Newington Electric stating an electrical inspector from this office made a statement as you alleged in your complaint. On March 22,2005,I spoke with Lynda Macha from Newington Electric Company for information on this matter.She stated from a copyof your complaint that I made a reference to the charges for their work I assured her that neither I nor any inspector in this office has the authority or the right to-consider anything outside of code related issues. Shortly thereafter,I spoke with you.You stated no recollection that I made such a comment and that it was not in the complaint of January 21,2005.Since I had not seen a copy of this complaint,I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Since that phone call I have seen a copy of the complaint and it indeed contains such a comment in the postscript. I would accept your written correction to the complaint,dated January 21,2065,reflecting an accurate account of my inspection.Your complaint as stands is flawed. Sinn 1 /�(iw low" 8'4 O Z ti 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soR•co � TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 John T.Cortese April 7,2005 Village Park Inc. 28 Main Street South Windsor,CT 06074 Re:Electrical Inspection/Permit# 19297 Dear Mr.Cortese, As accurately referenced in your letter to the Department of Consumer Protection,dated January 21,2005,I inspected work associated with permit# 19297. Prior to March 22,2005 my office received a phone call from Newington Electric stating an electrical inspector from this office made a statement as you alleged in your complaint. On March 22,2005,I spoke with Lynda Macha from Newington Electric Company for information on this matter.She stated from a copy of your complaint that I made a reference to the charges for their work I assured her that neither I nor any inspector in this office has the authority or the right to consider anything outside of code related issues. Shortly thereafter,I spoke with you.You stated no recollection that I made such a comment and that it was not in the complaint of January 21,2005.Since I had not seen a copy of this complaint,I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Since that phone call I have seen a copy of the complaint and it indeed contains such a comment in the postscript. I would accept your written correction to the complaint,dated January 21,2005,reflecting an accurate account of my inspection.Your complaint as stands is flawed. Sin Fing Christugan Chief ficaial Cc Lynda Macha,Newington Electric Company Department of Consumer Protection 7r�c�jgy� !`'��"�vt�� V ��, —Lr�cuL��Q, { i otiVAR�Fti �w °� Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 �9ND SkG October 29,2009 MR.JOHN CORTESE CASE NO.:09-01-1539A 28 MAIN STREET COMMUNITY: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, S.WINDSOR,CT 06074 HARTFORD COUNTY,CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY NO.: 090036 DEAR MR.CORTESE: This is in reference to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine if the property described in the enclosed document is located within an identified Special Flood Hazard Area, the area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. Using the information submitted and the effective NFIP map, our determination is shown on the attached Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) Determination Document. This determination document provides additional information regarding the effective NFIP map, the legal description of the property and our determination. Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding the subject property and LOMAs. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are enclosed. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination/Comment document. If you have any questions about this letter or any of the enclosures, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, LOMC Clearinghouse, 6730 Santa Barbara Court, Elkridge,MD 21075. Sincerely, Kevin C. Long,Acting Chief Engineering Management Branch Mitigation Directorate LIST OF ENCLOSURES: LOMA DETERMINATION DOCUMENT(REMOVAL) cc: State/Commonwealth NFIP Coordinator Community Map Repository Region Page 1 of 2 Date: October 29,2009 Case No.:09-01-1539A LOMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F � Washington,D.C.20472 �ak�SEA LETTER OF MAP AMENDMENT DETERMINATION DOCUMENT REMOVAL COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, A parcel of land,as described in the Warranty Deed, recorded as HARTFORD COUNTY, Document No.000521, in Volume 550, Pages 187 and 188, in the CONNECTICUT Office of the Recorder,Town of South Windsor,Connecticut COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NO.:090036 NUMBER:09003CO367F AFFECTED MAP PANEL DATE:9/26/2008 FLOODING SOURCE:CONNECTICUT RIVER;PODUNK APPROXIMATE LATITUDE&LONGITUDE OF PROPERTY:41.799, -72.630 RIVER SOURCE OF LAT&LONG:GOOGLE EARTH DATUM:WGS84 DETERMINATION OUTCOME 1%ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT BLOCK/ SUBDIVISION STREET REMOVED FROM FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVATION SECTION THE SFHA ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION (NAVD 88) NAVD 88) (NAVD 88 28/30 Main Street Structure X 31.9 feet 32.8 feet -- (shaded) Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any qiven year(base flood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below. PORTIONS REMAIN IN THE SFHA This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Amendment for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have determined that the structure(s) on the property(ies) is/are not located In the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of j being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document amends the effective NFIP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFIP map; therefore, the Federal mandatory flood insurance requirement does not apply. However, the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan. A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is { available for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 1 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, LOMC Clearinghouse, 6730 Santa Barbara Court, Elkridge,MD 21075. Kevin C.Long,Acting Chief Engineering Management Branch Mitigation Directorate Page 2 i'if 2 Date: October 29,2009 Case No.:09-01-1539A LOMA 'AQARTMF Federal Emergency Management Agency -'AMU S .a� Washington,D.C.20472 QL' LETTER OF MAP AMENDMENT DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY REMAIN IN THE SFHA(This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) Portions of this property, but not the subject of the Determination/Comment document, may remain in the Special Flood Hazard Area. Therefore, any future construction or substantial improvement on the property remains subject to Federal, State/Commonwealth, and local regulations for flood lain management. 9 P This attachment provides additional information regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627(877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency,LOMC Clearinghouse,6730 Santa Barbara Court,Elkridge,MD 21075. Kevin C.Long,Acting Chief Engineering Management Branch Mitigation Directorate