Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout279 PEPIN PL BLDG 14 �9 7 RJ�t? Electric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# HVAC# ( �Z? QV4 I t{ Date: Sprinkler# Estimated Cost $ 3,S"0O0 FINAL APPROVALS Permit Fee $ 14 30 Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ 30 Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit Appr.forCO. POP- SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE A Total Fee $ 24166 TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: �Iq(„ Applicant U -Location of Work !1_ig Lot No. Applicant's Address Tel # b 6,! 4 h?- Town 0 zip Cc-7 Lic.# 66 /T 93 0 Owner Architect_ �u g S2A1 Owner's Address Architect's Address Zip 6RSTAbory zip lQ&Q3 Sq. Ft. New Area: 1 st FI. f 2nd FI. 7 -3 3rd FI. 3"°i� Total New Area Purpose of this permit r City Water Well > Septic System J SeweLj/ Ins: HO SP Cert. Area Basement Garage Approved by Date Use Group Construction Type S-& I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper di ance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in whic this builddii'n nd i use is allowed. Signed L� I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occup y for the work scr ed in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELO THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS 201900547 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATE: 01/10/2020 y FEE: GIS ID:70700279 � '�•; 3- ZONE: MUNIS APPLICATION# 201801860 :Cl _ +- - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT x. , PEPIN PLACE'..-,-, -,UNDER APPLICATION NUMBER 201801860 CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE RBQUZ79. IREMENTS OF THE CONNECTICUT BASIC BUILDING CODE AND THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WIND-SOR'AND IS HEREBY APPROVED OF OCCUPANCY AS INDICATED BELOW: f APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY:OCCUPANCY:f 4fCONSTRUCT A•1938 SQFT SINGLE FAMILY-TOWN HOUSE W/2 BEDROOMS _2 1f/2 BATH,2 CAR GARAGE&DECK_',,?` =� SPECIAL CONDITIONS NOTICE: IF THIS CERTIFICATE IS 5LOST OR DESTROYED,A DUPLICATE SHOULD BE OBTAINED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. �L ;''.1 'y,�i .- .,,-.a r.:E•' '.l:•.+, by CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: r� r BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/10/2020 1:59 PM ANY CHANGE OR EXTENSION OF THE USE HEREIN APPROVED REQUIRES A NEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY INSPECTION FIELD SHEET 02/10/21 Printed by Middleton, Morgan 15 14 08 INSPECTION: 109565 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND PERMIT: STATUS: APPLICATION: 201801860 LOC: 279 PEPIN PLACE SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 70700279 OWNER: T & M BUILDING CO INC CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: CONSTRUCT A 1938 SQFT SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOUSE W/2 BEDROOMS WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: DOUG RESULT: PASS REQUESTED: 05/16/19 PRIORITY: SCHEDULED: 05/16/19 AM COMPLETED: 05/16/19 UNPAID FEES: 00 Date Time MILEAGE: 00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS ALL INSPECTIONS: INSPECTED INSPECTOR RESULT INSP DESCRIPTION O1/10/20 DOUG PASS B001 FOOTING O1/10/20 DOUG PASS B002 FOUNDATION 09/30/19 ROSE PENDING B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) CLOSE DUCT CHASE AT CEILING. (ATTIC) PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STUD BELOW TRUSS ECCENTRIC LOADED DUE TO SEVERED WALLPLATE (2 LOCATIONS) 10/02/19 ROSE PASS B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) RECHECK/ COMPLETE SEAL CHASE 10/02/19 ROSE PASS B004 INSULATION INCLUDING FIRESTOPPING SEP. WALL O1/08/20 DOUG PASS BO10 FINAL 07/29/19 ROSE PASS E001 ELECTRIC SERVICE RELEASED TO EVRESOURCE 7/30/19 CRS#3305544 09/30/19 ROSE PASS E003 ELECTRIC ROUGH 09/30/19 ROSE PASS H003 HVAC ROUGH 05/16/19 DOUG PASS P002 PLUMBING UNDERGROUND 09/11/19 ROSE PASS P003 PLUMBING ROUGH WATER TEST ON RG.PLBG WASTE & VENTS/TEST ON WATER PIPES 09/04/19 ROSE PASS P004 PLUMBING GAS TEST APPROVED FOR METER SERVICE Z003 CO PLANNING INSPECTION 14W APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074(PHONE) 860444-2511 EXT. 230 DEPARTMENT DECISION 1�1U�ER APPLICATION IS HEREBY: (�fJ APPROVED: BLDG.PERMIT NUMBER DATE INSPECTOIC LOCATION OF WORK: 7 9 ' BPS ��G /-&3 APPLICANT: / OWNER: TYPE OF STRUCTURE: It 1�4 iyvl 7 I�/.-Yl �iJ .�f nn >QlEWBUILDING NAME: —MrJ 9Z ZA^IeW/GZ NAME: 7' 4'lM �u I�Ay ea • ❑ADDITION PHONE NUMBER �� ?3 PHONE NUMBER:�I D y F4 T ?>a 9 0 EXISTING BUI[LDING ADDRESS: 5 .5 'FALL %l e"+PQr4 y-m ADDRESS: As A6r&-lc - .-� TYPE OF USE: C T IDENTTAI, o COMN(ERCIAL PLUMBING INFU01HATION:: FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK: TYPE OF INSTALLATION:—,t3P_ L0 la LOW hA ant$ 1���M(�T� —'a NO.OF TOILETS:_�STYLE:kb CO.OF BATHTUBS: `]�W AS N D ftl LG ��N SHIN W�rfi✓ NO.OF SHOWERS:_�_NO.OF LAVATORIES: NO-OF CATCH BASINS: NO.OF FLOOR DRAINS: ARE TOUXT COMPART[(EtM VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY WINDOW? s cm ESnMATED COST: S SIZE OF WINDOW: SUE OF DUCTS: SEWER OR SEMC TANK: S ruv-6r FEE ENCLOSED S SIZE OF WATER PIPING AND RISER: I& + !�- WATER HEATER: TYPE fir I G MANUFACTURER A&S-tiA v FEE SCHEDULE:$19 PER SI,000 O THE ESTIMATED COST. ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROTECT IS $1.00 OVER (.26 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE IIVaQM AS PART OF THE PERMPT FEE) THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK. CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.: _ TYPE: STATE: D ZZ�h? SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE: ao��•4 S c � APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 (PHONE) 860-644-2511 EXT. 230 DEPARTMENT DECISION PERMIT NUMBER: APPLICATION IS HEREBY: 14'a 3/ .7 APPROVED: BLDG.PERMIT NUMBER. DATE INSPECTOR LOCATION OF WORK: -2 79 APPLICANT: OWNER: TYPE OF STRUCTURE: A,&BUILDING NAME: QCZ tL!y(�Id1✓JSCI��' NAME: j�l✓"✓!7 R/7//.D//�� ❑ADDITION PHONE NUMBER: �bG� 73O' _ PHONE NUMBER,���ip,--�ZSZ'�-ro/yy ❑EXISTING BUILDING ADDRESS: -.22 ADDRESS: TYPE OF USE: aESIDENTIAL ❑COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL INFORMATION: FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK: TYPE OF INSTALLATION: /yz-z/� SIZE OF SERVICE: -W.4 SIZE OF MAIN SERVICE: -2/9o14 NUMBER OF METERS: / NUMBER OF PANELS: NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS: ESTIMATED COST:S .S 89r NUMBER OF SWITCHES: S 0� NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES: FEE ENCLOSED:S D C� NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS: FEE SCHEDULE:S18 PER$1,000 OF THE ESTIMATED COST. NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS: //> __ ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROJECT IS$1.00 OVER. (Z6 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE INCLUDED AS NUMBER OF OUTLETS: PART OF THE PERMIT FEE) THE UNDERSIGNED HEAEBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK. CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.: /D.3Slz TYPE: E--/ STATE: cT SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: * �L DATE: 71Z g do, gc/syy 5 "~ APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT" TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 (PHONE) 860-644-2511 EXT. 230 DEPARTMENT DECISION PERMIT NUMBER:I ���Q9 APPLICATION IS HEREBY: `1 APPROVED: BLDG.PERMIT NUMBER: DATE INSPECTOR LOCATION OF WORK: Q/ 9 *Fo p 1 n plc-c-L L-c,-�- (G' APPLICANT: OWNER: / TYPE OF STRUCTURE: 1 1 P �t PI NEW BUILDING NAME:A�t 4IY1�,,,cc.n H P��.Til1u�/� NAME: TF M �P s o ADDITION PHONE NUMBER:'Do -S 7 9 -Li9a 8 PHONE NUMBER: gG0' 9-603( o EXISTING BUILDING a ADDRESS:770 �Und ri n e_go ADDRESS: �( d- m"k %,e- r TYPE OF USE: P.oec"c 6397 tTn(c 4-1- cT- Tot, CT oG7(;o PRESIDENTIAL oCon�MERC1AL HVAC INFORMATION: FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK: TYPE OF SYSTEM: �ATING efA/C TY) wC�r V�. C HEATING: S TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH) °F (HEAT LOSS SHEET REQUIRED) DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDE MAKE AND MODEL NO): Cioocc Mr..,-I GMrSS-1 60�'-/o N ESTIMATED COST:f GCX� AIR CONDITIONING: ! 1 Of, DESIGN TEMP:OUTSIDE .F INSIDE °F DIFFERENCE P FEE ENCLOSED:S r s py ��— W TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH) (HEAT GAIN SHEET REQUIRED) DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUPMENT(INCLUDE MAKE AND MODEL NO.): FEE SCHEDULE:S18 PER S1,000 OF TILE ESTIMATED COST. &C-10G M5it'n � �Cj ALL J ROUND UP TO THE NEXT THOUSAND ONCE THE PROJECT IS SI.00 OVER. (.26 CENT EDUCATIONAL FEE INCLUDED AS PART OF TI1E PERMIT FEE) THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOMANCE OF SUCH WORK. CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.: 03cr799 TYPE: S STATE: �+C// SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE: G 1� aotgol-73q �4owh ar�� riovu Ole slout�i ?l &41at 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINASQR, CT 06Q74 TELEPHONE (660) 644-2611 'AN ,ACT CONCERNING •CONCRETE �`OUri1DA'T`IC�NS. Section t 0'6UC Ad NO- 1"5) &Odve Ootabea 1 20l�)� Prior to the issuanco of t,,ettiScats of O �caupanoy for a new residevedi or mmmaomtal building for wWoh a conor to foundation was installed,on or a te,r 0dober 1,2016,the spplioant shell provide the SnUdiu,g Ojackl with written doavuaoutetion of the aamo of the fm&YOW or entity that m"ged the ommto and the name of the individual or entity that ittatallai the conoreto, Copies of such documentation abaci be wabodainod is:the records of the office of the Balding Offloiai for not iris theta ft(50)years, Please AU the information in and submit to the Buffdbag De arbnent: Date of Wormadout r*cetve'Wffld: i-- 9 .1'0,a^�J �1COi�CL RPCBt�OJt1: SDk�.lL �!Y1K WO Job descrlPdon: �Nd M ) 79 -e p;,, P1,0-ce— ,_,�/J Name: �L11I 0'r CDKCI�E� - Nsune: Ace 6',DN.4 . (Please Px�nt) t;Pleesa � Address:,_,1 �� �LP�►l J� Address:_.,.. ,wr OOZY Phone/Contact: o~ ✓l' - 7//l phone Contact: hL6 y�• '�f p A •YCAN'jYCON'i`�eCTOB nfnrn�wHn (Pleue pdnt) Aadtirase: �. Phon,e/contact: I" >�4tV 6 E-mrett: OD , toil/ Signature: Date: /- 9 Go y WORK SITE SHEET . • 08-23-2019 CompanyiTM Building . . • Brook Street00 Pleasant Valley -. •• •c of project: Decks no roof or • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■7■■�■■�■■�■f'`°�■`a■■MINI■■`'�■Ir■\'�■`'• ■■KSM0\■MININU NIMN■■■■MINE■■MINI■■■■■■ MINI"■`■■`r■`■■■!��Z■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MKIMEMM ' ■_- - ME 0 EMKOM ■---- Kam ■--�- ature of Installer: ) i tachna Me* po:.s Selection Table - Techno Metal Post Maximum compressive bearing Lateral bearing ado Techno M apidt),ttxe capacitys bendtag Past Model Project Type US ULS SLS ULS (bs) (b) (W) (lb) (klY) (b•ft) (kN-m) PI (O.D.1.9 in/ Light residential(deck,patio,etc.) 6 800 30.2 9 520 42,3 225 1.0 1010 1.4 483mm) P2 NMum residential and Ngbt commercial (OD.2.4 in/ catpott,sunrooms,single storey residential 9 600 42,7 13 440 59.8 450 2.0 1785 2.4 603mm) dditionEing, pedestrian bridge,ctc.) ddendal,Llgiat to MedinaP3 ciai and Industrial(Cottage,camp, (O.D.3.5 in/ me,two storey residential addition, 33750 150,1 47250 210,2 2250 10.0 6454 8,8 88.9rnm) ed,supporting cokunn, brill etc.) P4 envy Residential,Light to Medium (O.D.4.0 in/ mmercial and Industrial(cottage,camp, 45000 200.2 63 000 280,2 2 700 12,0 9 411 12,8 101.6nun) ile home,supporting column, ing,pedestrian bridge etc.) P3-HD vy Residential,Light to Heavy (O.D.3.5 in/ CommercW and Industrial(supporting 50 625 225.2 70 873 315.3 2 250 10,0 9 057 12.3 88.9mm) kmm,underpinning,etc.) P4-14D vy Residential,Light to Heavy (OD.4.0 in/ maereld and Industrial(supporting S0 625 225.2 70 873 313.3 2 700 12.0 13 394 18.2 101.611111) ahumm,underpinning em) PS cavy Residendal,Light to Heavy (OD.5.6 in/ mmcrelal and Industrial(cottage,camp, 50 US 225.2 70 873 315.3 4 SW 20.0 21316 28.9 mm 141.3n) le home,supporting column,sign,lamp w9aPinnig.pedestrian bridge,etc.) P6 eavy Residesdal,Light to Heavy in/ mercid and Industrial(cottage,camp' (O.D.6.6 168.6.6 in ife home,supporting column,sign.lamp 50625 225,2 70 575 315,3 6 750 30,0 33 876 45,9 t,MIgnuing. brldm ctc.) Oks: t.The maximum tensile toad capacity an be obtained,conservatively,by halving the values of the bearing capacity is compression shown In the sckctiun table. .The naxinu m compressive bad(SLS)shown in the selection table limit the settlements to 12 rant(1/2 inch). 3.Too ntaximumt compressive hearing capacity(SLS)is determined by the nuxlatum torque allowable by the installation equipment used(see specifications of Installation equipment) .When the pile is laterally trsupponed(soil vary bore/soft,liquefiable soils,water and air),the structural strength tithe pile nun be approved by des technical depertmart of Techno Metal Post. Tie values of latent capacity are average values and an be modified,more or fats,depending on the characteristics of the existing soil. oaneets: For my questions.please comet the technical department of Techno Metal Poet, Lager Techno Metal Post cm be used for applimdom requiring a lateral or pending tasistmce higher than shown in the selection table. This process for the above listed project involved the screwing of specifically designed and engineered posts applicable for this project. PSI readings were taken on each individual post during the installation and with the use of a correlation table these measurements are listed and described below. • PSI/Torque: Pounds per square inch/The rotational pressure taken to drive the post • Depth:The distance downward from its top surface. • TYM, Piers are categorized for each individual specific project • Bearing:Downward pressure post can withstand • Pinned:Bored into solid immoveable rock reaching maximum compression and tension.Once the post was driven one additional test was performed,the percussion test.This test involves stalking the post with a sledge hammer,5 times per set,while being measured for resistance.Once there Is zero downward moment the post and pressures are verified. • t1 lit:The force required to putt the post out of the ground.the uplift value Is half of the bearing. 1 i i I fh RPM ENERGY SOLUTIONS 69 PERRY RD,HAMDEN CT BUILDING LEAKAGE TEST 06514 203-903-7387 BPI#5005996 Date of Test: 11/22/2019 Test File:279 pepin place Customer: BOB Technician: V CASTELLON Project Number: Building Address: 279 PEPIN PL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Test Results 1. Airflow at 50 Pascals: 718 CFM50 (50 Pa=0.2 w.c.) 2.99 ACH50 X PASS 2. Leakage Area: 39.5 in2 LBL ELA @ 4 Pa 3. Building Leakage Curve: Flow Coefficient(C)= 56.5 Exponent(n)=0.650(Assumed) 4. Test Settings: Test Standard: RESNET One-Point Test Test Mode: Depressurization 5. Accuracy Level Standard Level of Accuracy Test V CASTELLON 203-903-7387 Infiltration Estimates 1. Estimated Average Annual Infiltration Rate: 32.6 CFM 0.14 ACH 8.1 CFM per person 2. Estimated Design Infiltration Rate: Winter. 46.1 CFM Summer: 36.3 CFM 0.19 ACH 0.15 ACH Cost Estimates 1. Estimated Cost of Air Leakage for Heating: 2. Estimated Cost of Air Leakage for Cooling: Mechanical Ventilation Guideline(based on ASHRAE 62.2-2010) Recommended Whole Bldg Rate: 46.0 CFM Base Rate: 46.0 CFM �~ RPM ENERGY SOLUTIONS DUCT LEAKAGE TEST RESULTS 69 PERRY RD,HAMDEN CT 06514 203-903-7387 BPI#5005996 Date of Test: 11/22/19 Test File: 279 PEPIN PLACE Test Performed For: BOB Phone V CASTELLON 203-903-7387 Test Results 1. Test Type: Total Leakage (Duct Blaster Only) 2. Test Pressure: 25.0 Pa 3. Measured Duct Leakage: 66.0 CFM(10.6 sq. in.) 4. Duct Leakage as a Percent of System Airflow: 5. Duct Leakage as a Percent of Building Floor Area: 3.5% X PASS Additional Information Duct leakage is often one of the largest sources of energy loss in a house. Leaky supply ductwork causes expensive conditioned air to be lost before it can be delivered to the house,forcing your system to run longer to keep you comfortable. Leaky ductwork can seriously degrade indoor air quality by pulling pollutants and irritants directly into your house. Leaky return ductwork can also pull moisture into your home, making it feel uncomfortable even when the air conditioning is running. RPM ENERGY SOLUTIONS 69 PERRY RD,HAMDEN CT BUILDING LEAKAGE TEST 06514 203-903-7387 BPI#5005996 Date of Test: 11/22/2019 Test File:279 pepin place Customer: BOB Technician: V CASTELLON Project Number. Building Address: 279 PEPIN PL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Test Results 1. Airflow at 50 Pascals: 718 CFM50 (50 Pa=0.2 w.c.) 2.99 ACH50 X PASS 2. Leakage Area: 39.5 in2 LBL ELA c@ 4 Pa 3. Building Leakage Curve: Flow Coefficient(C)= 56.5 Exponent(n)= 0.650(Assumed) 4. Test Settings: Test Standard: RESNET One-Point Test Test Mode. Depressurization 5. Accuracy Level Standard Level of Accuracy Test V CASTELLON 203-903-7387 Infiltration Estimates 1. Estimated Average Annual Infiltration Rate: 32.6 CFM 0.14 ACH 8.1 CFM per person 2. Estimated Design Infiltration Rate: Winter. 46.1 CFM Summer: 36.3 CFM 0.19 ACH 0.15 ACH Cost Estimates 1. Estimated Cost of Air Leakage for Heating: 2. Estimated Cost of Air Leakage for Cooling: Mechanical Ventilation Guideline(based on ASHRAE 62.2-2010) Recommended Whole Bldg Rate: 46.0 CFM Base Rate: 46.0 CFM RPM ENERGY SOLUTIONS DUCT LEAKAGE TEST RESULTS 69 PERRY RD,HAMDEN CT 06514 203-903-7387 BPI#5005996 Date of Test: 11/22/19 Test File:279 PEPIN PLACE Test Performed For: BOB Phone V CASTELLON 203-903-7387 Test Results 1. Test Type: Total Leakage (Duct Blaster Only) 2. Test Pressure: 25.0 Pa 3. Measured Duct Leakage: 66.0 CFM(10.6 sq. In.) 4. Duct Leakage as a Percent of System Airflow: 5. Duct Leakage as a Percent of Building Floor Area: 3.5% X PASS Additional Information Duct leakage is often one of the largest sources of energy loss in a house. Leaky supply ductwork causes expensive conditioned air to be lost before it can be delivered to the house,forcing your system to run longer to keep you comfortable. Leaky ductwork can seriously degrade indoor air quality by pulling pollutants and irritants directly into your house. Leaky return ductwork can also pull moisture into your home, making it feel uncomfortable even when the air conditioning is running. r• REScheck Software Version 4.6.5 Compliance Certificate Project Building 14-unit 103- Baltic Energy Code: 2012 IECC Location: South Windsor, Connecticut CA Construction Type: Single-family IVNED Project Type: New Construction Orientation: Bldg. faces 45 deg. from North Conditioned Floor Area: 1,938 ft2 Glazing Area 2% Climate Zone: 5 (6155 HDD) Permit Date: Permit Number: Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 279 Pepin PI. T&M Building Co., Inc. Hans Hansen South Windsor, CT 06074 110 Brook Street Hans Hansen Architectural Design Torrington, CT 06790 150 Sycamore Street 860-489-9229 Glastonbury,CT 06033 info@TandM.com 860-995-9671 hanshansendesign@yahoo.com • • • UA trade-off Compliance: 0.3%Batter Than Code Maximum UA: 319 Your UA: 318 The%Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how close to compliance the house Is based on code trade-off riles. it DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum code home. Envelope Assemblies Gross Area Cavity Cont. Perimeter Wall 1:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 63 19.0 0.0 0.060 4 Orientation: Back Comment:Southeast wall Wall 2:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 333 21.0 0.0 0.057 18 Orientation: Left side Comment: Northeast wall Door 4: Solid 20 0.260 5 Orientation: Left side Wall 3:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 63 19.0 0.0 0.060 3 Orientation: Front Comment: Northwest walls Door 3:Solid 20 0.260 5 Orientation: Front Wall 16:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 63 19.0 0.0 0.060 4 Orientation: Right side Comment:Southwest wing wall Wall 4:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 261 22.0 0.0 0.056 15 Orientation: Right side Comment: Southwest party wall Wall 5:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 180 19.0 0.0 0.060 9 Orientation: Back Comment: Sotheast 1st floor walls Project Title: Building 14-unit 103- Baltic Report date: 09/25/18 Data filename: C:\Users\Bob\Documents\bce\Bldg-14-unit 103-Baltic.rck Pagel of 3 1 Gross Area Cavity Cont. Perimeter Window 5:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 7 0.290 2 Orientation: Back Door 5:Solid 18 0.260 5 Orientation: Back Wall 6:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 9 19.0 0.0 0.060 1 Orientation: Left side Comment: Northeast 1st floor walls Wall 17:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 324 22.0 0.0 0.056 18 Orientation: Left side Comment: Northeast party wall 1st floor Wall 9:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 180 19.0 0.0 0.060 9 Orientation: Front Comment: Northwest 1st floor walls Window 7:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 16 0.290 5 Orientation: Front Window 8:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 6 0.290 2 Orientation: Front Wall 10:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 261 22.0 0.0 0.056 15 Orientation: Right side Comment: Southwest party wall 1st floor Wall 10:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 72 19.0 0.0 0.060 4 Orientation: Right side Comment: Southwest walls 1st floor Wall 11:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 160 19.0 0.0 0.060 8 Orientation: Back Comment: Southeast wall 2nd floor Window 10:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 20 0.290 6 Orientation: Back Wall 13: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 8 19.0 0.0 0.060 0 Orientation: Left side Comment: Northeast wall 2nd floor Wall 18:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 324 22.0 0.0 0.056 18 Orientation: Left side Comment: Northeast party wall Wall 12:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 160 19.0 0.0 0.060 8 Orientation:Front Comment: Northwest walls 2nd floor Window 10:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 20 0.290 6 Orientation:Front Window 10:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 6 0.290 2 Orientation: Front Wall 14:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 232 22.0 0.0 0.056 13 Orientation: Right side Comment: Southwest party wall 2nd floor Wall 15:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 64 19.0 0.0 0.060 4 Orientation: Right side Comment: Southwest wing wall 2nd floor Wall 18:Wood Frame, 24" o.c. 100 19.0 0.0 0.059 6 Orientation: Front Comment: Loft-Front Wall Wall 19:Wood Frame, 24" o.c. 100 19.0 0.0 0.059 6 Orientation: Back Comment: Loft-Back Wall Wall 20:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 175 22.0 0.0 0.056 10 Orientation: Right side Comment: Loft-Right Side Party Wall Wall 21:Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 175 22.0 0.0 0.056 10 Orientation: Left side Comment: Loft-Left Side Party Wall Floor 1:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 481 30.0 0.0 0.033 16 Comment: Floor over garage Project Title: Building 14-unit 103- Baltic Report date: 09/25/18 Data filename: C:\Users\Bob\Documents\bce\Bldg-14-unit 103- Baltic.rck Page 2 of 3 Gross Area Cavity Cont. Perimeter Floor 2:Slab-On-Grade:Heated 36 10.0 0.796 29 Insulation depth: 1.7' Comment: Insulation at garage slab haunchs Floor 3: Slab-On-Grade:Heated 27 10.0 0.702 19 Insulation depth: 3.0' Comment: Perimeter foundation frost wall Ceiling 2: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 300 38.0 0.0 0.030 9 Comment: Ceilings not in loft Ceiling 3: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 432 30.0 0.0 0.035 14 Comment: Loft Ceilings Skylight: FSM08:Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Double Pane with Low-E 22 0.440 10 Compliance Statement. The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been design d to meet the 2012 IECC requirements in RESch k Version .6.5 and to comply with the mandatory require4re ed in thM ck Inspection Checklist. lzf Name-Title S' Date Project Title: Building 14-unit 103- Baltic Report date: 09/25/18 Data filename: C:\Users\Bob\Documents\bce\Bldg-14-unit 103- Baltic.rck Page 3 of 3