The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About25 VALLEY VIEW DR APPLICATION FOR:ELECTRICAL PERMIT DEPARTMENT DECISION TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# Application is hereby: BUILDING DEPARTMENT APP O D . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE ' 644-2511.ext. 230 Bldg:Permit# Dat6 Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: $041,000=$15.00 Over$1,000= Street No. Street Lot No. $15.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt No. APPLICANT 2"_/e c 0"�- c APPLICANT ADDRESS 33 s� v-1 4 s i APPLICANT'S PHONE# OWNER 0W N SFq< OWNER ADDRESS y 1/1 n trh Cn OWNER PHONE 6 — Z S 7 //Y C ESTIMATED COST$—'T'- � � IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? 1 Yes No FEE ENCLOSED,$ a TYPE OF JOB: Ca 5-b sOR•C0 New Installation Alteration/Addition/ epair -A ;2.81(ooNy3 Revised 03/05/10 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERAUT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDIlVG IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAATION? W YES ❑ NO RESIDENTIAL CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY r13 BUSINESS ASSEMBLY FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE FACTORY ❑ STORAGE ADDRESS ❑ GARAGE ❑ hECED USE CITY STATE ZIP (Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD, SIZE OF SERVICE SIZE OF MAIN CONDUCTORS NUMBERS OF METERS _ NUMBERS OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBERS OF PANELS NUMBERS OF DISCONNECTS REQUIRED? 0 YES 0 NO NUMBERS OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUTfS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FDCTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER-OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUSTBE-SUBMTITED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEARBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFOR- MANCE OF SUCH WORK �2-3yT- CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. _- TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE ! 1, 2 Electric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing#. HVAC# � v Date: Sprinkler# ( (Q� S-3 Estimated Cost $ S FINA OVAL�S Permit Fee $ Building - COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit ► SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE t Appr.for CO. Total Fee $ TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ tYe The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: Applicant ocationofWork D15 Q LotNo._ Applicant's Address Q Tel # Town mar L tV Zip0t�,� �[ _Lic.#��O^�� Owner A , lW ,n Architect_ _ Owner's Address �`tjl� Architect's Address Zip Zip Sq. Ft.New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI. Total New Area Purpose of this permit kiF 'l r City Water J Well J Septic System ] Sewer J l I Ins: HO SP Area Basement Garage Approved by � Date 8 �- Use Group P)-+ Construction Type Revised 1108 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alter plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be loc he er distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in whi is b ng and its use is allowed. Signe I hereby apply for a Certificate of c ancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS INSPECTION FIELD SHEET 11/05/18 Printed by Acevedo, Maria 15 it 29 INSPECTION: 88034 FOOTING PERMIT: STATUS APPLICATION: 201601143 LOC: 25 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 91200025 OWNER: MELOUGH JAMES STEWART & NANCY S CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION. WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: ROSE RESULT: PASS REQUESTED: 09/21/16 PRIORITY: SCHEDULED: 09/23/16 AM COMPLETED: 09/23/16 UNPAID FEES 00 Date Time MILEAGE: 00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS ALL INSPECTIONS: INSPECTED INSPECTOR RESULT INSP DESCRIPTION 09/28/16 DOUG PASS B002 FOUNDATION RE BAR OK 11/10/16 DOUG PASS B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) SHEILA @ 860-643-0502 11/10/16 DOUG PASS E003 ELECTRIC ROUGH 11/05/18 DOUG PASS BO10 FINAL STRUCTURAL REPORT RECEIVED AEGIS En¢ineering Services, Inc. 141 Weymouth Street Rockland, MA 02370 Tel: (781)982-4008 Fax: (781)982-4009 E-Mail: info@aegiseng.net June 3,2016 Mr.Craig Entwistle Paul C. Higgins Insurance Adjuster 250 State Street North Haven, CT 06473 RE: Claim No.: PR132341 Insured: Jim Melough Location: 25 Valley View Drive, South Windsor,CT Claim: Foundation Damage AEGIS File No.: A13994 Dear Mr.Entwistle, On May 17, 2016, AEGIS Engineering Services, Inc. (AEGIS)was retained to review the above referenced claim. The objective of our assignment was to evaluate the cause of claimed damage to the cast-in-place concrete foundation at the rear addition of the insured's house. On May 26, 2016,AEGIS met at the property to observe the claimed damages and interview Mr. Melough. On the same date, we reviewed the property file at the South Windsor Building Department. The following is a summary of our findings. Property Description and Loss Background Mr. Melough has owned the subject property since 1991. The property is improved with a raised g J P P Y ranch that was built in 1973. A 24-foot by 26-foot addition was constructed at the left end of the rear wall of the house in 1997. The rear addition is wood framed and is constructed on a cast-in- place concrete foundation that encloses a fully finished basement that walks-out to the rear of the house. Mr. Melough stated that a few years ago he noticed some small cracks in the exterior face of the concrete foundation at the rear left and right corners of the rear addition. He stated that he recently became aware of news reports of deteriorating foundations in the area that were Consulting Engineers and Scientists Insured:Jim Melough PR132341 June 3, 2016 Page 2 of 4 •constructed with concrete supplied by the J.J. Mottes Company of Stafford, CT. Mr. Melough stated that he then took a closer look at the exterior surfaces of the concrete foundation walls of the rear addition and noticed more cracks. Mr. Melough stated that he contacted the builder of the rear addition, and that the builder informed him that the concrete used to build the foundation of the rear addition was supplied by J.J.Mottes Company. Review Findings Due to drywall finishes in the basement, AEGIS was not able to evaluate the interior surfaces of the foundation walls of the rear addition. Based on these finishes, it appears that the top of the concrete foundation walls extend approximately 44-inches above the basement floor. Our evaluation of the concrete foundation was limited to the exterior surfaces of the foundation walls that extended above-grade. The following was observed at the rear addition: 0—The rea undation-wall-extended-approximately-4 I-inches-above-grade-along-its-full ---- length. At the left side of the addition, the top of the foundation wall extended 38 inches above grade at the front-left corner and 41 inches above grade at the rear-left corner. At the right side of the addition, the foundation wall extended 4 inches above grade at the front-right corner and 16 inches above grade at the rear-right comer. • The exterior surfaces of all three of the concrete foundation walls at or near grade level were covered with a pattern of interconnected horizontal and vertical cracks, commonly referred to a"map-cracking" The cracks varied in width from hairline to approximately 3/16 inch. • Visible map cracking was most severe at the rear left and right comers of the foundation, and along the right foundation wall. • The visible areas of the foundation walls did not appear to be leaning or bowed. There were no interior finish damages in the basement that would indicate foundation movement has occurred. Common causes of map cracking in concrete include, but are not limited to alkali-silica- reactivity (ASR); internal sulfate attack(ISA); and external sulfate attack(ESA). The primary difference between internal and external sulfate attack is the source of the sulfate ions which "attack" components of the concrete mixture and cause distress in the concrete. In ISA, the sulfates were incorporated in the concrete mixture prior to placement. In ESA, the source of sulfates is external (e.g., contained in the soil or groundwater), but the sulfate ions gradually leach into the concrete via groundwater or surface water transport. In short, in ISA the concrete itself is defective while in ESA harmful chemicals from the environment leach into otherwise sound concrete via groundwater or surface water transport. It is our understanding that distress, in the form of map cracking, of many cast-in-place concrete foundations in the region has been linked to J.J. Mottes, who obtained crushed stone aggregate Insured:Jim Melough PR132341 June 3, 2016 Page 3 of 4 containing a deleterious mineral known as Pyrrhotite from Becker's Quarry in Willington, CT. Pyrrhotite is an iron sulfide. When exposed to moisture and oxygen, the Pyrrhotite oxidizes and expands in volume, cracking the crushed stone aggregate and the surrounding cement paste, which leads to visible map cracking and eventual failure of the concrete. Further testing would be required to determine the exact cause(s) of the distress. Testing would include core sampling and petrographic analysis of the concrete that comprises the foundation, and possibly testing of soil and groundwater. Conclusion The observed map cracking and deterioration of the concrete are characteristic of underlying problems with the concrete mixture, or external sulfate attack via groundwater transport. There are several potential defects in the concrete that could result in the observed damages. The deterioration of the concrete could be due to deleterious materials that were introduced into the mixture at the time of production (i.e.ASR, ISA, or aggregate containing Pyrrhotite), or due to sulfates from the surrounding environment that were introduced into the concrete via CP ndwater-or surface-water-transport-after_-it_was-placed-(i.e.,r-ESA). Tbe-Aack-of-nearb-y------ wetlands or a septic system (common sources of sulfates within the environment) immediately adjacent to the deteriorated areas of the insured's foundation suggests that external sulfate attack is not a likely cause. The insured believes that the concrete used to construct the foundation of his house in 1997 was supplied by J.J. Mottes. The map cracking observed in the foundation walls is consistent with oxidation of Pyrrhotite, a deleterious mineral that has been linked to aggregate in concrete supplied by J.J. Mottes to the Stafford Springs area in the 1980s and 1990s (when the rear addition house was built). Collection and laboratory analysis / testing of core samples (including petrographic analysis), and possibly sampling and analysis of soil and groundwater would be necessary to determine the exact cause(s)of the observed damage to the concrete. It should be noted that our findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based on our observations during our site visit. Unless expressly stated otherwise, interior finishes were not removed and contents were not moved to observe and evaluate all areas of the structure. Our conclusions concerning extent of damages and necessary repairs are, therefore, limited to the degree that structural elements of the building were readily accessible and visible at the time of our inspection. Our opinion(s) concerning the necessary scope of repairs have been prepared for estimating purposes only and could change if further intrusive investigation by AEGIS or others reveals that the damage is more extensive than indicated by our initial limited inspection or if the local building official requires code upgrades that are not anticipated in the repairs. AEGIS is not serving as the engineer of record for repairs. If required by the local building official or by regulation,the insured should retain their own engineer to develop an appropriate repair plan. Insured:Jim Melough PR132341 June 3,2016 Page 4 of 4 •Thi's report is intended for the sole use of State Auto Insurance Companies and Paul C. Higgins Insurance Adjuster. The scope of services performed in execution of this investigation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re-use of this document or the findings,conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Please call the undersigned should you have any questions or need anything further. Very Truly Yours, AEGIS Engineering Services,Inc. James E. Holmes,P.E. James M.Reg Structural Engineer Principal Attachments: Photographs .�y FOR BUILDING* PURPOSES ONLY �2. !64 a o �`p r ,4 ,� N o DAP , , �css /� ppp/IIRr►►7�ij',, , V A ,� oaopa C a Nxza v1 t :Z No.2683 .11V Irv- 40 N p briai•pIp►pt CONN f� 50' �`� c�t� hQ oho G ' FSS�OV I _ PROPERTY OF NO . VALLEY. VIEW DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR.. CONN. Being Lot No. 75 on map entitled "Map of Valley View Farms Ellington Road South Windsorp Conn. Property of Emma Palmer & Kenneth Palmer Scale 1" a 801 Nov. 1. 1960 Hayden L. Griswold C.E." Scala 1 " .. 50 c/11.d_ _1 ./_�i�,2z GriswoldT&-TUSS1C'1= � �..-� South Windsor BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO THE BUILDING DEPT, TOWN OF SOUTH Ihltv'US,, This certified that this Plan and specifications are Ir,., coPies of the Proposed building or alterations to Le erected at togetherh ��` � Sir filed with plan ry amendments stated in application ,.,,� and I agree to con,Ply with all ionir;I, Building and state laws and such orders as shaft issued by the Building Department of this application and final during pende�•7 permit. issuance of a bulld.rq,signed S� L/i1w �Al This plan is aPProved su Diee�o the orders and urdinunees regulatingcondition thr eon,Plied with building shall bt Cond.lionaUy Approved These tiled wftN 641W.a; Inspector -'� E%4NM Sato CERTIFICATION OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Proposed building(s), use(s) and/or structure(41 as shown on this plan appc-ar(s) to be in conformance with current So-lth Wind regulations. Variances and special excepticl:a / Inay apply. i Date CAMng E rcement Officer e2 FOR BUILDING PURPOSES ONLY 72• fir, e y 1 6Q 900 �U 0 7�- � 75 ti �h 40"AMP A a, ♦♦♦d9p�F AC°N fC �I, AI&C- 7A•/A//�." .. ,� N1.2683 ��y+i, r0 a u a a,a�p♦♦♦♦ � 'ro v� O♦ O ��'►� rs 46'S9 �F CO N N r Nv �e\y C Ali � �`` � ��•��~.� � -� No. 2633RE IsTy'o �w PROPERTY OF NO. VALLEY. VIEW DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. Being Lot No. 75 on map entitled "Map of Valley View Farms Ellington Road South Windsor, Conn. Property of Emma Palmer & Kenneth Palmer Scale 1" - 801 Nov. 1p 1960 Hayden L. Griswold C.E." Scale 1 " - 50 Griswold'& FUSS;:Ins NED. ��F t ) o�. N � �[ ��'vFSE,v v �$' � Pp� I.Q�►� G, tv N N I V C. c y 'A 0 3 I/ Sao • .•YIN.TNICR ON {i LR F.,RIC 0.'7 /L 3 G' CT°ON M OT :•CRV,NE /A Q 0 FILT[R r.MIC � DR p, (� d E- 1.. Ef9S� qcE N t&A % �2J �lEtiT S NSTtUCTION ENTRANCE NTH C4 A �" ;AF '� . ' WEA°" IMPROVEMENT LOCATION PLAN O .� � , YL•l fo„ .'�`� Nm �' a - d ^ M SHOWING PROPOSED POOL ' s . tPROPERTY OF p aR[ r�or i.. .RCRfIL .�. y JAMES STEWART MELOUGH / !, NOMOI CONTRO S�•� \ fKTLR . -. 1 2+O � ,ECTICN... -•�I. N h , ^�x SILT FENCE OIJ �• ►trs NANCY S. MELOUGH 2a . Gp.fZ• Go.S� N �c, NOTES: 25 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE TYPE OF SURVEY= IMPROVEMENT LOCATION. ' PURPOSE IS TO LOCATE PROPOSED POOL z 2. PROPERTY LOCATED IN ZONE AA-30. $ 0 3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SOUTH WI N DSOR, CONNECTICUT r ANY CONSTRUCTION. z S¢ 4. ALL WORK AND RESTORATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF SCALE: 1" = 40' MARCH 23, 2000 it SOUTH WINDSOR REQUIREMENTS. 5. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DEPICTED ARE APPROXIMATE IN NATURE. OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT DEPICTED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS- 1•p�P£ "CALL BEFORE YOU DIG'1-800-922-4455 TOLL FREE. I Q!�0 6. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS OR SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL tp i ��..� POOL DIMENSIONS. ` I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION MAP IS SUBSTANTIALLY V CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND WERE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE v WTH THE STANDARDS OF A CLASS A-2 DEPEIVENT RESURVEY AS DEFINED IN pE 4j SECTIONS 20-30 1 THRU 20-30M-2D OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE I'P AGENCIES-'MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SURVEYS AND MAPS IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT'EFFECTIVE 6-21-96 AS ADOPTED BY THE CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION PETER PARIZO SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING OF LAND SURVEYORS,INC.ON SEPTEMBfR;ZA 19W. ,�.1. L�,^' I t` ! /j .� 536 SOUTH MAIN STREET �� 3 Z T Zoo v PAWEST HARTFORD, CT 06110 ti- ✓h5�v� (860)561-02M PETER PARIZO,LS.148M ' ' I DATE TO THE IUILDIP, DEFT TOWN OF SOOTS 14"NOSOI This grtified that this plan and speelfleatlons are tru. staples of the Proposed duldinQ ratted at or alterations to D• toMost, with amendments stated 1�— Streef on i7ul dingfit - Plan and te lewsree an to comply wthlt alit lZoning. i and e4 d such ing D, ofs this a th• Bull and ,n Partr�ntoduring Pgnderders as incy a application final Permit. issuance of a building 1 Signed _ ( yq This plan Ie eC `` �`Proved sub orders and ordinances 1 t to the condition ees regulating that Complied with. Q building shell be Conditionally Approved ritaN filed with Bull.ding Inspector Claris Bale Ct�, i 0� LUi�liJv LOMPLIANCE Proposed building(s), use(s) and;or structure(s) as shown on this plan appears) to be in ;conformance with current South Windsor regulations. Variances and special exceptions may apply. Date Zoning Enforcement Officer 1600557 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 09/21/2016 GIS ID: 91200025 FEE: 0.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201601143 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: CREATIVE REMODLERS GROUP ADDRESS: 25 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE ADDRESS: 945 CENTER STREET OWNER: MELOUGH JAMES STEWART&NANCY S MANCHESTER,CT 06040 25 VALLEY VIEW DR SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION. FEES WAIVED. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 9/21/2016 9:36 AM TIIE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 1600551 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER ELECTRICAL PERMIT DATE: 11/22/2016 GIS ID:91200025 FEE: 0.26 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201601143 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: ROCKY HILL ELECTRIC ADDRESS: 25.VALLEY VIEW DRIVE ADDRESS: 3352 MAIN STREET.," w. OWNER: MELOUGH JAMES STEWART&NANCY S ROCKY HILL, CT 06067 - 25,VALLEY VIEW DR -SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: WIRE ROOM TO CODE. mAu ' c } SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ,. ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 11/22/2016 12:06 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE