Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout130 STONEFIELD TRL Electric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# — HVAC# )30 C12�it��L� � 'a' I Date: +Z 5\ jao\q Sprinkler# Id- OW009 Estimated Cost $--is,39 5.00 FINAL APPROVALS Permit Fee $ r-,�Oi5 Building _ COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit Appr.for CO. I SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE A Total Fee $oty TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: Applicant i (S LL C Location of Work Tra 6� Lot No. Applicant's Address CA (r 1Ve(5e SA-- Tel # �Zi--c651-1Sg00 Town C'7v P`� C�CIS _ Zip 0600-7(D Lic.# �I c-0&34013I5 Ownerc-104 V,n n�' Oyd.\e Architect AA?�A Owner's Address O 2\C\ 7ro, Architect's Address W O( Zip 0(Qd 1 LA Zip Sq. Ft. New Area: 1 st Fl.. 2nd Fl. 3rd FI. _ _ _Total New Area Purpose of this permit`' a(-"p.\ 1 Ic �c&icos (e QCQov City Water Well :..I Septic System ] Sewer YJ Ins: HO SP Area Basement Garage Approved by Date l Use Group Construction Type G a Revised 1108 )01 q I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this building and its use is allowed. SignP I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS r � 202000500 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION DATE: 07/07/2020 FEE: GIS ID: 86100130 ZONE: MUNIS APPLICATION# 201902985 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL UNDER APPLICATION NUMBER 201902985 CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONNECTICUT BASIC BUILDING CODE AND THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR AND IS HEREBY APPROVED OF OCCUPANCY AS INDICATED BELOW: APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY PARTIAL FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT SPECIAL CONDITIONS NOTICE: IF THIS CERTIFICATE IS LOST OR DESTROYED,A DUPLICATE SHOULD BE OBTAINED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/14/2021 9:40 AM ANY CHANGE OR EXTENSION OF THE USE HEREIN APPROVED REQUIRES A NEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY INSPECTION FIELD SHEET O1/14/21 Printed by Middleton, Morgan 09 39 14 INSPECTION: 125871 FINAL PERMIT: STATUS APPLICATION: 201902985 LOC: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 86100130 OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G & JOAN S CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: PARTIAL FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: WEAR RESULT: PASS REQUESTED: PRIORITY: SCHEDULED: 03/16/20 AM COMPLETED: 03/16/20 UNPAID FEES 30 00 Date Time MILEAGE: 00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS ALL INSPECTIONS: INSPECTED INSPECTOR RESULT INSP DESCRIPTION 02/19/20 DOUG PASS B001 FOOTING 02/20/20 DOUG PASS B001 FOOTING 02/20/20 DOUG PASS B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) B004 INSULATION B005 FIREPLACE / CHIMNEY B006 WOOD / GAS STOVE B009 OTHER B002 FOUNDATION lk Electric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# HVAC# 7(1 Date: 1 (Z5IZO70 Sprinkler# au- LFINAL APPROVALS Estimated Cost $ 11 Permit Fee $ Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit Appr.for CO. ► SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE A Total Fee $_ TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: Applicant U,wkj_(5 tLc Location of Work i \ Lot No. Applicant's Address Lit CQC\V�eCSe SV . Tel # i5z-165k-8$00 Town tkLoA -d SQLn4.S Zip CYQQ_1CO Lic.#MC-cAoSLW58 Owner C-loxv,;rn 4 Joan T 1 \R Architect Owner's Address \ (OL I Architect's Address 7poyC yi SO,r Zip 00007M Zip Sq. Ft.New Area: 1 st Fl. 2nd Fl. 3rd Fl. Total New Area POLA Purpose of this permit 10' u I4 ' Slicee(\Pd ?Qnch City Water Well J Septic System J Sewer St Ins: HO SP Cert. Area Basement Garage Approved bye- Date Use Group`,&,�— Construction Type-;;;;�- ' Y' a(Dao oo i Cl u Revised 1108 s I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the oper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this b g and is use llowed. Signe I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS f i INSPECTION FIELD SHEET O1/14/21 , Printed by Middleton, Morgan 09 35 36 INSPECTION: 126633 FINAL PERMIT: STATUS APPLICATION: 202000190 LOC: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 86100130 OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G & JOAN S CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: 16' X 141 SCREENED PORCH WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: DOUG RESULT: PASS REQUESTED: PRIORITY: SCHEDULED: 03/10/20 PM COMPLETED: 03/12/20 UNPAID FEES 00 Date Time MILEAGE: 00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS SUNROOM ROOF ALL INSPECTIONS: INSPECTED INSPECTOR RESULT INSP DESCRIPTION B001 FOOTING B002 FOUNDATION B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) B004 INSULATION B005 FIREPLACE / CHIMNEY B006 WOOD / GAS STOVE B009 OTHER �cJ caiu EXISTING STAIR N EXISTING X 5T(�� A 1——————- 3'-10"t DRAINAGE A S1 GRATE C A R N S1 S1 S1 EXISTING OIL EXISTING 4r0 �oRG TANKS. EXISTING SANITARY PIPE, RELOCATE AS ELECTRICL l y_p• T-OM REQUIRED SERVICE ANEL J RELOCATE AS 7'_p' RELOCA AS EX STING WATER _ REQUIRED REQUIRE, SERVICE PIPE. EXTEND rJECT CRACKS Aq REQUIRED )ATION WALL " m7l WAY -- L--- ----------- -------------- — — 1 � V PLAN at WALL I d � 4 -„rf C , o 0 0 o EXISTING Y INJECTED Sim S' , ° FU ° RELOCATE n EPDXY INJECT EXISTTNG WALL, EXCAVATE AND C14� I Cl Co Co PROVIDE 2x8 P.T. o REQUIRED _ N N BLOCKING BETWEEN X PROVIDE 2x8 P.T. x TOP OF NEW AND X , W I THE RATE OF DETERIORATION OF THE g W BLOCKING BETWEEN BOTTOM OF EXISTING LiEXISTING BEAM Sl TOP OF NEW AND 2r - ( BOTTOM OF EXISTING 3 y 0 r"--- ——————————LALLY — 23'-3"t ----- -- BEAM COLUMN, TYPICAL - St SIM 61_4» EX (2) 2x10 — EX (3) 2x8 — — — I 1 7-0 S1 ci ( I o I I EX. (2) 2x10_�----- " `'J - 1 PARTIAL FOUNDATION 1st FL B I , s1 r 16'-1 "t o N EXISTI G STAIR N ++ SC. 1/4"=1'-0" N I0„ 0 BE o R ON URE _ ,, r o v w W AS IRE to v EX 15T1 SIC 1. ® INDICATES NEW 8 THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE 1 x 9'-1"f �' 17'-4"f o 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS TO BE VERIFIE ---- --- -- _-- N N 41 7PP^4 CAR FIELD PRIOR TO START OF NEW WORK. I o VA Aerz 3. ALL TEMPORARY SHORING IS THE SOLE RESPON' OF THE CONTRACTOR. OVE ANDx LiI PON EXISTING 4"0 4. RWORK NCLUDINGPLACE PIPES, ELECTRICAL, EANY AND ALLTA 17'_lpt I SANITARY PIPE. 5. CODE: 2005-CONNECTICUT STATE BUILDING COD A RELOCATED AS (EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2009) 2003 INTERNATIO, Sl REQUIRED 20D5 CONNECTICUT SUPPLEMENT, WITH THE 200 2005 CONNECTICUT SUPPLEMENT. 6'-4" EXISTING WATER A 6. INDICATES APPROXIMATE HEIGHT OF EXISTING Q 7'-0* SERVICE PIPE. EXTEND S1 BASEMENT SLAB ON GRADE E AS REQUIRED A REFER TO ALTERNATE PARTIAL v SIM S1 (; PLAN FOR �� Sf+nt'[7���( In��1 !5ao235' APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT DEPARTMENT DECISION TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# A tc is he by: BUILDING DEPARTMENT VED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext. 230 Bwg:Permit# Date i1jmQ Inspector , • �150 r7 b33 Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: $0-$1,000-$15.00 ISO SEone wlc� -rvt�l Over$1,000 a Street No. Street Lot No. $15.00,per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt No. APPLICANT Aacoc� I.oc}s APPLICANT ADDRESS 9.21 av+•N¢,• MUk6� Arc _N " 1944Q'In, Cr . 060SZ APPLICANT'S PHONE* 8 b0 .3.2y.7 yo 1 DW N $� OWNER �C,►cV►n. 8ov 'y� & OWNER ADDRESS Sojw. w.r,65ac cr otb0-7V O OWNER PHONE 8bo, y N. 0o S6 Q ESTIMATED COST$--- 3s7,3.zY.a o IS THIS A CONTRA T? Yes No �~ ' FEE ENCLOSED$ 495 _ rA i TYPE OF JOB: .A� 4�o LI dSOR•Co New Installation X Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 03/05/�0 ... , -:� �; �g'9�"-++��?'.wr*w�.,w+.+5ab+ems��, � ....4 '4 �' .'� �`n,•t w ,�. '� r APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL,PERNIIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF B TiT DIN IS THIS APPLICATIONASSOCIATED WITHA- BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? l .YES. ❑-.NO RESIDENTIAL CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY O-BUSIA s O.ASSEMBLY FU FURE USE AND OCCUPANCY ❑ EDUCATIONAL; ❑ INSTITUTIONAL, ENGINEER'S NAME ❑ FACTORY PHONE, O STORAGE ADDRESS ❑GARAGE ❑ MIXED USE CTTy STATE ZIP (other plcase'specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION[WIRING METHOD SIZE OF SERVICE SIZE OF MAIN CONDUCTORS NUMBERS OF METERS NUMBERS.OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBERS OF PANELS NUMBERS OF DISCOMdE4'TS REQUIRED? ❑ YES ❑ NO NUMBF,RS OF EIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF.SWITCHES. NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF-LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER'OF HEAT CIRCUITS' NUMBER'OF A IC CIRCUITS SEPARATE BEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BESUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK e\���c.cr� vas irk FC,r cn �r,b�c..\���c►� of a s o1c� �,! coo F �r�,� •- x� THE UNDERSIGNED FIE4,R11YAPPI,IES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND rS TO COMPLY WITH ALL-LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES.IN THE PERFOR- MANCE OF SUCH WORK o 19789q C-r 9/30/1S CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OFAPPLICANT DATE I Il S 11S G-Tec Solar, LLC 28 Pinnacle Mountain Rd. Simsbury, CT. 06070 888-52-SOLAR I.Aaron DLoltzauthorize G�-Ebfm)l to pull an electrical permit for the following job: Name: Location: 'So Phone: Description of job: oc\ t>{ G- Job date: Job cost: Authorize signaturw- License 4 ELC.0197899-El t. ?A-R-7-FA-EPITT QF z-rj-J,,JqUh4 T, Be it known that J, AARON D LOITZ • 521 SHUTTLE MEADOW A17:r,,: NEW BRITAIN, CT 06052-1826 has been certified by the Department Of Consumer Protection as a licensed ELECTRICAL UNLIMITED CONTRACTOR License #ELC.0197899-El Effective: 10/01/2014 Expiration: 09/30/2015 P­GARDIIER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES L;7.CLO PotrnO:.o TOLLAND, C0NN C)JCUTC.v", n J 00 O ro / v 0 e0 T p.Z2 cv—m 0 t0 7 \ N q T N • „�.. ' �� r •i O r (001 r �a v\ j3,Ss J ' r ti Goa a� iJ �r- � 3S-c 7 i //C S ! 0 ,0` V ti •p .y f i PERMIT PLAN LOT #8 STONEFIELD TOWN OFISOUT40WINDSOR* CONNECTICUTSCALE: �? •9�• r .4 Ile �3v ' L�h L. S. # 10839 1 une 25, 1985 I REFERENCE: "Subdivision Plan Stonefield Town of South Windsor, Conn." by Gardner & Peterson Associates Scale 1" = 40' Date 7-28-84 Revisions 1-12-85 I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS YY i 4ag'Z• 8 P wA, o� R O ENCI',Vi�RISO, R DATE: _p DZ7AAn7-P��N SIG.: i r lyst'� I ter.. r,ti A_"St;LIATES -576 OLD POST RCAD TOLLAND, CONNECT/G#,.'i.,:L,.s +� O Li av � v Gt�e 3 t,p..,0 11olE V 9 w ate ti��� * 3, ,.•, �/C � ti ��•��t�,_, M "!•W Ek L r.\ i �'J_J._u, o J y) to i i 11 TEl- 3,8 h �t "— 3ts• t �' 03 Z MORTGAGE SURVEY LOT #8 - STONEFIELD TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT / ! SCALE: 1" = 40' D { Z , I hereby certify that the location of the building as �! shown is substantially correct and that there are no N+ zoning violations of the same. s r1 CLASS D e C� L.S. #10839 DATE: November 25, 1985 REFERENCE: Subdivision Plan Stonefield Town of South Windsor, Conn. Gardner & Peterson Associates Tolland, Connecticut Scale 1" = 40' Date 7/28/84 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS Ez- To"-,ml 0= N DATE:-4-2---/a, <— SIG.: t��'C Q►ee C G� -"q e-1 -� cbt) ,&c+cr c,, (2 IIS �`-�°".00►�'`� {�n'latlen�_ ElIctric # APPLICATION FOR BU DING PERMIT-, Plumbing# HVAC# 30 .S�on�-Ii e I�l ��r 1 Date: 7' S C-S+' Sp rinkler# Estimated Cost 0 06, FINA A ROVALS Permit Fee $ Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ Engineeri g TYPE OF PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit ► SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE t Total Fee $ J9 I dq t23 TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ �2 The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: Applicant 42ae- �- Location of Work Lot No. Applicant's Address Tel # Town S - ff e 0 Zip Oir U;" Lic.# 451 63 4-lO S 4 Owner 6�0,tl 1 in 7^ Architect �Owner's Address 3 -[bvt,G 7✓i i L Architect's Address S,/VA / I i'd"A y,- Zip O 60-2 L/ Zip Sq. Ft.New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI. -T Total New Area Purpose of this permit 1144 / e—er h .iLt l'1► l City Water❑ Well ❑ Septic System ❑ Sewer❑ 2ot go 1$�7 Ins: HO SP J Cert. Area Base nt Garage Approved by Date `I % Use Group Construction Type Revised 1108 r R ' I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this building and its use is 3 owed. Signet! I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS VIA I • Qerrhi+ be;n� 61d Elettric # Cpyt} �r. APP ICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT PluNFINALAP HV Date: �z?, P- Spr Estimated Cost $ 7S',in� ALS Permit Fee $Bui COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ a Engineering Affidavit TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ ApprJorCO. SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE t Total Fee $ t, 23S TO THE BJILDING DEPART NT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ 72 9 The undersigned hereby applies to Nwork according to the following: Applicant Vj Location of Work 1 U - Tr, Lot No. _ Applicant's Address ld r oar _ Tel # �JE�s7-Gyy-S&YY Town Zip Oleo?y Lic.# Owner ire Archi t Owner's Address Architect's ddress Zip Zip Sq.Ft. New Area: 1st Fl. 1 2nd FI. 3rd Fl Total New Area Purpose of this permit r e w i r AAA we J��,.r.�-�-�aw City Water J Well J Septic System J Se r J ?p I LA 0\,j Ins: HO SP Cert. Area Basement rage Approved by Date Use Group Construction Ne Revised 1108 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of ` South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this building and its use is allowed Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed Z16 4-� — DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS INSPECTION FIELD SHEET 12/03/15 Printed by Peart, Dayshell 10 34 16 INSPECTION: 73313 FOOTING PERMIT: STATUS: APPLICATION: 201401827 LOC: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 86100130 OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G & JOAN S CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: REPAIR FAILING FOUNDATION. WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: ROSE RESULT: N/A REQUESTED: PRIORITY: SCHEDULED: COMPLETED: 12/03/15 UNPAID FEES 00 Date Time MILEAGE: 00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS ALL INSPECTIONS: INSPECTED INSPECTOR RESULT INSP DESCRIPTION 12/03/15 ROSE N/A B002 FOUNDATION 12/03/15 ROSE N/A B003 FRAMING (ROUGH) 12/03/15 ROSE N/A B004 INSULATION 07/16/15 ROSE PASS B005 FIREPLACE / CHIMNEY MARK Q 860-833-3013SMOKE CHAMBER 12/03/15 ROSE N/A B006 WOOD / GAS STOVE 12/03/15.,.- ROSE ��,-m--..N/A__. ,_ B009 _.OTHER -_ �i08/07/15 DOUG PASS BO10 FINAL '�^ WITH-CONTRACTOR, HOMEOWNER"'­ Electric'# I SU > ,t-� APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# _ HVAC# 0o Era,ne--�i c(rJ 1 ►'!t I Date: I I/5/IS Sprinkler# _ I SU U033 Estimated Cost $ 2.Oo0-o0 FINAL APPROVALS Permit Fee $_ Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavit AppinforCO. ► SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE -4 t Total Fee $ TO THE BUILDING RTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ �3 The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following: Applicant GC, Sokav Location of Work ISO S4one. K. 'TVCC% 1 Lot No. Applicant's Address .5y2 Nopn @4&SR SF. AM3 ISO Tel # 8b0.580•'7�7�{ Town SimSNzo x4 Zip Ob'10"70 Lic.# 0636344 Owner 6CLCV;r% 1&coQ6 — Architect Owner's Address 130 SArorim dA 'tiRC•\ Architect's Address Zip Zip Sq. Ft. New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI. Total New Area Purpose of this permit t'odW T% City Water Well J Septic System ] Sewer J iS�CbL(o Ins: HO SP Cert. Area Basement Garage Approved by Date ��� Use Group Construction Type Revised 1108 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of , South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this b g and its use is allowed. Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the wollescribed in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS INSPECTION FIELD SHEET 08/26/15 Printed by Peart, Dayshell 09:07:36 JNSPECTION: 73811 `�` PERMIT: STATUS: APPLICATION: 201500066 LOC: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY ID: 86100130 OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G & JOAN S CONTRACTOR: REQUEST BY: PROJ DESC: INSTALLATION OF ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY. WORK ORDER: INSPECTOR: RESULT: -k REQUESTED: 08/20/15 PRIORITY: ��g SCHEDULED: 08/24/15 04:00 COMPLETED: ` UNPAID FEES: .00 Date Time MILEAGE: .00 TIME: TRAVEL ONSITE COMMENTS: MIKE ® 860-580-7174 ALL INSPECTIONS: � INSP TOR Y RESULT IN$,P_;P,$iSCRIPTION "+�#I��� OK TO RELEASE TO EVERSOURCE CLAIM INVESTIGATION at 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Insured: Boudle Claim No.: 60002005513 File No.: 15-02398 Date of Loss: 12/18/13 Prepared by: Carl S. Cianci. P.E.. Principal C�3 011� CIANCI ENGINEERING, UC CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGfNEERS 53 Hurlbut Street West Hartford,CT 061 10-1912 (860)527-6415 FAX (860)249-1918 1 Prepared for: Mr. Dallas Dodge,Jr. A.E. Oberhaus, Inc. ddodge't raeoberhaus.com - - r CNC Project No. 15 019 03 February 9, 2015 { i 130 Stonefteld Trail South Windsor,CT Page I INTRODUCTION It is our understanding that the owner and insured of the residence located at the referenced address has filed a claim for damages to the residences foundation. It was reported that the foundation is cracking and failing. Cianci Engineering. LLC was retained by Mr. Dallas Dodge, Jr. of A.E. Oberhaus, Inc. to investigate the claimed damages in order to render an opinion on their cause and origin. When the claim was assigned to Cianci Engineering. LLC, it was discovered that the insured also recently retained Cianci Engineering. LLC directly to investigate the foundation. render an opinion on its structural soundness and to make recommendations on remedial work, if required. Prior to investigating the claim on behalf of A.E. Oberhaus, we notified both Mr. Dodge and Mr. Boudle (the owner and insured)of our previous involvement and the current claim assignment. OBSERVATIONS On February 6. 2015. Mr. Carl S. Cianci, P.E. made a site visit and met with Mr. Dodge and Mr. Boudle. At the site. Mr. Boudle reported that he is the original owner of the residence that was constructed in 1985. Approximately 7 to 10 years ago,the perimeter of the concrete slab on grade in the basement was removed to allow the installation of a drain and sump pump. A waterproofing product, such as Thoroscal. was also reportedly applied some time ago to the interior face of a portion of the foundation walls. Mr. Boudle also reported that he became aware of the cracks within the foundation towards the end of 2014. At that time, he retained our firm to investigate the foundation walls. The foundation was investigated and drawing S-1 was issued on December 24. 2014 (3 showing a scope of work to add a new foundation wall on the inside of the existing. f1x distressed foundation walls. 4� �f 3: At our February 6. 2015 site visit, we were directed to the basement space where we (' observed the subject foundation walls. We noted that the walls were 10"thick. poured in place, concrete approximately 7 ft high above the concrete slab on grade. Photographs 1 through 3 show general views of the interior face of the foundation walls that contain map cracking, which is not consistent with normal shrinkage and settlement cracks in foundation walls. As seen in the photographs, there is evidence of efflorescence. which is indicative of high ground water conditions. The map cracking observed is shown in closer view in photograph 4. As seen in the photograph, the cracking is both horizontal and vertical. Photograph 5 shows the foundation wall below the fireplace on the first floor, where map cracking was observed. It was reported that there was also distress in the finishes on the first floor. adjacent to the fireplace. We observed the upper level and noted a crack in the interior wall adjacent to the fireplace, as shown and highlighted in photograph 6. We also observed the foundation wall at the basement stair landing and noted a crack in the corner jog. with evidence of some vertical movement. Distress and evidence of movement was also observed to the interior finishes above the subject stair landing. CIANCI Engineering,LLC CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 130 Stonefiekl Trail South Windsor. CT Page 2 CONCLUSIONS The insured's concrete foundation has evidence of map cracking that is not consistent with normal shrinkage and settlement cracks. The observed damage is not due to a sudden or isolated event, in our opinion. Based on the above and our experience investigating similar claims, it is our opinion that the cause of the claimed distress to the insured's foundation is due to a material defect in the concrete that is causing an expansion reaction taking place within the wall. The reaction involves water and likely an unsuitable aggregate used in the concrete mix when the residence was constructed in 1985. The observed conditions have been gradually occurring for many years and will worsen with time, in our opinion. The foundation has not Net deteriorated to a point that collapse is imminent, in our opinion. We have investigated numerous concrete foundations in the general area that have been constructed at approximately the same time as the insured's residence and have experienced similar problems. The cause of the typical problem observed is due to an expansion reaction taking place within the concrete. The reaction has been documented to be dependant on ground and surface water exposure to the concrete. Foundation walls exposed to higher levels of ground water have deteriorated at a quicker rate then those walls exposed to less (or no) ground water, such as interior walls. We are aware of at least two properties that have had extensive testing of their concrete. including core samples and a petrographic analysis of the concrete. One concern was a problem known as Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR), which occurs when some aggregate in the concrete reacts with highly alkaline cement paste. ASR was ruled out as the cause of the distress on the concrete foundation with similar distress that had extensive testing. There is no known repair that can be implemented to correct the problem. Since the rate of deterioration has been determined to be dependant on the exposure to ground and rf water. exterior waterproofing can be installed to low t rate of the deterioration surface ate . e o rp g s he e and prolong the life of the subject foundation. The wall will. however, very likely continue to deteriorate over time. Other options include replacement of the defective foundation with a new foundation, which requires a rather extensive scope of work. Some owners with similar problems have selected to pour a new foundation wall on the inside of the existing foundation, which is what was previously designed and detailed for the insured, and shown on drawing S-1 prepared by our firm dated December 1-4, 2014. While this scheme is considered a reinforcing scheme, it will not correct the material +: deficiency with the existing concrete. We trust that this meets your needs at this time and will be available to discuss our ri findings in further dctail, if required. is enclosures: Photographs 1-6 ii CIANCI Engineering, LLC CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SE^ South Windsor,CT Page 3 1'.._ � .• ...]'yam 's+^ T �` Photograph I Photograph _ 7 � Photograph Photograph r�nA Photograph • CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS `-=3�►��- _=� CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS CIAMCI eMaIM•<ExINA,LLC MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Dallas Dodge,Jr. via email at ddodge,a:aeoclaims.net From: Mr. Carl S. Cianci. P.E. Re: 130 Stonefield Trail, South Windsor,CT Insured: Boudle Claim No. 60002005513,'File 15-02398 CNC# 15 019 03 Date: March 15, 2016 In accordance with your March 8. 2016 email. we have reviewed the March 8, 2016 CieoDesign, Inc.Engineering Report(including the appendices)authored by Mr. Ulrich La Fosse. P.E. Appendix 3 of the report includes a Petrographic Examination report prepared by Testing. Engineering, and Consulting Services. Inc. (TEC Services) dated March 7. 2016. The purpose of TEC's investigation was to determine the reason(s) for the deterioration of the concrete. Briefly,the conclusions of the TEC report indicate the following: • The concrete was of low quality, retempered to a higher water cement ratio than originally batched and was not air entrained. • The pyrrhotite content is high and unusual. • The deterioration in the concrete is due to oxidation of the pyrrhotite in the aggregate. • Less than 10%of the pyrrhotite is completely oxidized. Based on our review of the referenced reports. we reaffirm the opinions expressed in our report of findings dated February 9, 2015. 53 Hurlbut Street, West Hartford, Connecticut 06110-1912 Phone (860) 527-6415 Telefax (860) 249-1918 \AR G E O 0 E 8 I C& N GEOTECHNICAL I CONSTRUCTION I ENVIRONMENTAL I N C O R P O R A T E D ENGINEERS and SCIENTISTS March 8,2016 -- -1'7 File No.3821-001.04 Dallas C. Dodge Jr.,General Adjuster , OU A. E. Oberhaus, Inc. G``' 1 2�1� Suite 318 Sou`.h %%',n or 56 Arbor St. Building Deoa�ment Hartford,CT 06106 Via e-mail: ddodge(cDaeoberhaus.com Re: Engineering Report Deterioration of Concrete Foundations Claim Residence at 130 Stonefield Trail South Windsor, CT 06074-1718 Dear Mr. Dodge: GeoDesign Inc., (GeoDesign) is pleased to provide our engineering report for the captioned residence. The purpose of our investigation was to supplement the investigation by the structural engineer, to provide site specific data regarding the make-up and condition of the exposed portions of concrete foundations, to obtain representative core samples of the concrete foundations for testing, and to obtain subsurface data and samples along the exterior of the foundations. Our engineering investigation included: one or more site visit(s), interviewing the owner of the residence, viewing deteriorated portions of the exposed concrete foundations (both inside the basement and outside the home), sample and data collection, testing assignment, summarizing of the testing data, and findings. The engineering field work was performed either by the undersigned or by Rob Brautigam (EIT)working under the undersigned's direct supervision. The concrete coring, drilling of test borings, and well installation was performed under GeoDesign's direction by Associated Boring Contractors, at locations selected by GeoDesign. 1.0 Following, in list form, is the data we obtained: Site Location: 130 Stonefield Trail, South Windsor, CT Name of Present Owner(s): Garvin G. Boudle Date of Site Visit by Ulrich LaFosse,P.E.: 10-9-2015 Date of Foundation Coring: 12-15-2015 Number of Foundation Concrete Cores: 4 984 SOUTHFORD ROAD • MIDDLEBURY, CONNECTICUT 06762 • TELEPHONE: 203.758.8836 • FACSIMILE: 203.758.8842 Residence at 130 Stonerield Trail,South Windsor,CT A.E.Oberhaus,Inc. March 8,2016 File No.3821-001.04-Page 2 Foundation Concrete Cores Designations: C-04-1U;C-04-1L; C-04-2U; C-04-2L Date of Drilling of Test Boring: 12-15-2015 Number of Test Borings: 2 Test Boring Designations: B-1, B-2 Date of Observation Well Installation: 12-15-2015 Date of Follow up Observation Well Reading: 12-15-2015 Observation Well installed in Boring: B-2 Depth to groundwater relative to Ground surface: No Groundwater to> 10 ft. Depth to groundwater above or below main Basement Level: >2 ft+/- Date of Follow up Observation Well Reading: None Date representative soil sample(s)was/were sent to Testing Laboratory: 12-21-2015 Date Foundation Concrete Samples sent to Testing Laboratory/Petrographer: 12-21-2015 2.0 Attachments: The following data is included in the appendices: Appendix 1 —Field Sketch (Depicting Boring/Well/Foundation Core Locations) Appendix 2—Boring/Well Logs Appendix 3—Petrographic Examination Results(by TEC Services) Appendix 4—Foundation Concrete Core Strength Testing Results Appendix 5—Soil Testing Results (by Fugro Consultants via Geotesting Express) Appendix 6—Limitations 3.0 Findings: 3.1 Soil Soluble Sulfate Testing Results: Two of the soil samples which were tested for soluble sulfate (ASTM D-516) indicated levels below the detection limit (<100 mg/kg, or parts per million on dry weight basis). One soil sample had a soluble sulfate concentration of 370 mg/kg, and another soil sample had a soluble sulfate concentration of 202 mg/kg. 3.2 Petrographic Examination: As concluded in the March 7, 2016 Report Petrographic Evaluation, prepared by Testing, Engineering& Consulting Services, Inc.. Residence at 130 Stonerield Trail,South Windsor,CT �1 A.E.Oberhaus,Inc. March 8,2016 File No.3821-001.04-Page 3 • The concrete was of low quality at the time of construction; • The pyrrhotite content in the aggregate is high and unusual; • The deterioration of the concrete in upper and lower levels of the house foundation is due to oxidation of the pyrrhotite in the aggregate; and • Less than 10% of the pyrrhotite is completely oxidized, with the remaining pyrrhotite having a potential for causing additional detrimental reactions that may further deteriorate the concrete. 3.3 Concrete Strength Test Results: Four concrete core samples (C-04-2U-A; C-04-2U-A; C-04-2U-A and C-04-2U-B) were tested for compressive strength (by the ASTM C42 method) and indicated Compressive Strengths of 3,490; 3,550; 3,660; and 3,570 psi, respectively. 3.4 Follow up Well Measurements: As needed, additional field measurement(s) of the groundwater monitoring well can be obtained (in particular during the typical seasonally high groundwater period) to supplement the available data. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Very Truly Yours, GeoDesign, Inc. l I" Ulrich La Fosse,P.E. Senior Principal Appendix 1 Field Sketch (Depicting Boring/%Vell/Foundation Core Locations) 3$24-0o 1,o 4 SHEET NO. OF G E O 0 E S 1 0 N CALCULATED BY DATE 4b s- G♦<OTLCHNICAL ENGINE E" fN RONMfNTA( CON5w lANY5 CHECKED BY Lr DATE 3 9454 SOUTHFORD ROAD MIDDLEBURY CONNECTICUT C+67C.2 TELEPHONE: (203)758-8836 FACSIMILE: (203)758—BB42 =,E .ilrwri I31L,co bWRB 14''1' I1 �-of-lv 24'Uo4-2L C-o1-2L UNFIN V GAS8i &Akw SLAB OA) So SToA.E'PrFL� �7tML DOC— 3'rewEG�ttD T7�Alt_ LEGEND Go'L-or-sic B-1 Alk TEST BORING NO. AND LOCATION (ow) BY GEODESIGN. INC. I- OBSERVATION WELL INSTALLED C-M-1 U CONCRETE FOUNDATION CORE NO. AND LOCATION BY GEODESIGN. INC. SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE CONCRETE SILL SILL FOUNDATION FOUll"TON FDUlbAT10N FOUl�ATI�1 Fxrirl.� — _ — w3f'(a� xM Ex�s'TW¢►o" ►7' �1 7w" C-o�-1L C-of-Zl,. 1'r , CONCRETE CONCRETE 8/k4EIdENT BASEMENT FLOOR SLAB FLOOR SLAB I I SECTION A—A' SECTION B—B' NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCAM Appendix 2 Boring/Well Logs BORPTG LOG goring No.: B-1 Project Name G E O 0 E S 1 4% N Page No.: 1 N G O R P O R A T E D Geotechnical I Construction I Environmental 130 Stonefield Trail File No.: - 001.04 Engineers and Scientists South Windsor,Connecticut 884 Southford Road - Middlebury,CT 06762 Checked By: Telephone:(203)758-8836 Fax:(203)758-8842 Boring Company: Associated Bonng Company sin. Sampler: Groundwater Observations Foreman: Jaime Uoret Type: HSA Ss Date Depth Ekv. Notes GenDesign Rep.: Robert Braut am I.D.: 325 in. 138 in. (11) (ill Date Started: December 15,2015 Date Finished: December 15,2015 Hammer WL: N/A 140 Ibs T 12/15/15 None observed N.Coordinate: E.Coordinate: Hammer Fad N/A 30 in. 2 Ground Surface Elevation(feet): Rig Type* C M E 45B Truck T Stalon- (1A"cct h a c Te. Donut-Catheed IT Sample Information Strata Sample Description 3 Description s e Blows/6 inch Interval m�i r— y,, G TE O Depth& t7 u ci.:.. z.. O 0-6 6-12 12-I B 1 B-24 :.�E U Elevation(feet) Classification System:Modified Butimster Fill 1 Ss 24 8 10 3 4 5 6 Loose,red-brown fine to coarse SAND,little Silt, little fine to coarse Gravel,trace Organic Fibers 2 Ss 24 6 3.0 5 8 7 10 Medium dense,red-brown fine to coarse SAND, trace fine Gravel,trace Silt 5 5.0 3 ss 1 24 s 5.0 30 36 1 32 45 Gravelly Sand o Very dense,red-brown fine to coarse SAND,little 0 >00 >00 1>00 >00 fine Gravel,trace Silt 7.0 Bottom of E)loration at 7.0 ft 10 0 15 0 0 a z z N z 2 u) 20 O O 'a 1 25 w LL U, (J N n a 0 0 0 30 N o 1.)Borehole advanced open-hole to T below grade with split spoon(no augers/casing)until hole caved after Sample S-3. o m E 0 h � U E (7 O Notes:1)Stratifncaton)sues represent approximate boundary between matenal tvpes,transitions may be gradual O 2)Water level readings have been made at times and under condition stared.fluctmtions of groundwater nay occur due to other factors than thou present at the time mcastaememu were trade.AC=After z coring NR=Not Recorded. Fr 3)Abbreviations A=Auger.C=Core.NTC.Nacrocore;D=Driven;G=Grab.PS=Piston Sample;SS=Split Spoon,SSL=3 5 Inch ID SplitSpoon.Sr=Shelby Tube. TV=Vane;WORE=Wcot of Rod Ibmrner a)Proportions Used.Trace=1-10'..Link=10-2a:,some=20-35.And=35-50". Boring No.: B-1 BORING LOG Boring No.: B-2 Project Name G E O 0 E S I G H Page No.: 1 N C O R r O R A T E D Geotechnical I Construction I Environmental 130 Stonefield Trail File No.: 3821-001.04 Engineers and Scientists South Windsor,Connecticut 984 Southford Road - Middlebury,CT 06762 Checked By: Telephone:(203)7588836 Fax:(203)758-8842 Boring Company: Associated Bonnq Company cm . Sampler: Groundwater Observations Foreman: Jaime Uoret Type: HSA SS Date Depth Elev. Notes GenDestgn Rep.: Robert Braun am I.D.: 3.25 in. 138 in. (ft) (ft) Date Started: December 15,2015 Date Finished: December 15,2015 Hammer Wt.: NIA 140 lbs T 12/15/16 None observed N.Coordinate: E.Coordinate: Hammer Fal N/A 30 in. T Ground Surface Elevation(feet): Rig Type: CME 458 Truck T Stab on' O set ft smmer %_� Donut-Ca}need T Sample Information Strata Sample Description 3 Description o E m Blows/6 inch Intenal G C G C U y t G r C 'E C Depth& 0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 :J 0 Ekvahon(feet) Classification System Modified Barrister Fill 1 SS 24 8 10 1 1 1 1 Very losse,fine to coarse SAND,little Silt,trace fine Gravel,trace Roots 2 SS 24 4 3.0 2 2 2 3 Loose,brown fine to coarse SAND,little fine to coarse Gravel,little Silt 5 3 Ss 24 12 5.0 6 15 27 35 6.0 Dense,red-brown fine to coarse SAND,little fine Gravelly o to coarse Gravel,trace Silt Sand a O 10 0 4 SS 24 10 100 11 13 16 13 o Medium dense,red-brown fine to coarse SAND, some Silt,little fine Gravel 12.0 Bottom of Eiploration at 12.0 ft 15 O U O (Y O Q N 2 U n 20 O O U 'a t, w 25 LL Z U N n e 0 0 0 30 N m 1.)Groundwater monitoring well installed to 10'below grade with 1.25"PVC pipe.5'Screen and 5'solid pipe,filter pack sand. i; o F N a U f (7 O Notes:1)Stratificanon lines represent approximate boundary between matcnal types,transitions may be gradual. U 2)Water level readmp have been made at tints and under conditions stated.fluctuations of groundwater my occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were ride.AC=After Z coring;hint-Not Recorded 3)Abbreviations'A=Auger,C-Core:A1C=bfacmcore;D=DmvN G-Gab;PS=Piston Sairpk;SS=Split Spoon;SSL=3 5 Inch m Split Spoon;ST=Shelby Tube; m V=Vane;WORN-Weight of Rod Hatm cr 4)Prupottiom Used Trace-1-Itr.Link=10-20!a Some=20-350iw And=35-506: Boring No.: B-2 Appendix 3 Petrographic Examination Results (by TEC Services) Bill TEC Services Te5ft • Engineering•Comfting March 7,2016 Mr. Ulrich La Fosse, P.E. GeoDesign, Inc. 984 Southford Road Phone: 203-758-8836 Middlebury, CT06762 email: u.lafosse@geodesign.net Subject: Report of Petrographic Evaluation Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundation 130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,Connecticut TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2,TEC Lab ID 15-1344 Dear Mr. La Fosse: Testing, Engineering, and Consulting Services, Inc. (TEC Services) is pleased to submit this report of our petrographic evaluation of two (2) cores drilled horizontally from residential concrete foundations for the residence on 130 Stonefield Trail, in South Windsor, Connecticut. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the reason(s) for deterioration of the concrete. Our report includes background information, core information, petrographic observations, conclusions, figures (scans, photos, sketches, and photomicrographs), an Appendix on some of the technical terms used by petrographers, and an Appendix that discusses pyrrhotite degradation in concrete. PROVIDED CORE SAMPLES On December 30, 2015, 2 cores, nominally 4" in diameter, were received by TEC Services in Lawrenceville,Georgia.These cores were taken from upper(marked as"U")and lower levels (marked as "L") of the concrete foundations. The upper core was taken 16-inches from the top the concrete foundation while the lower core was taken 46—inches below the top of the foundation. The cores were drilled horizontally,and taken from the interior to the exterior. PETROGRAPHIC EXAMINATION OF CONCRETE(ASTM C856) Preparation To maximize the opportunity to identify deterioration in the concrete, the cores were diamond sawn into longitudinal sections perpendicular to the top of the foundation (Figures la-2b) and then the flat surface was polished. Cracks in the concrete were noted and sketched in Figures lb and 2b. Pyrrhotite in the aggregate was identified on the polished surfaces.Thin sections were prepared of a cross section across the interior of the companion half cores. Sketches of the location of the thin sections in relation to the cores are provided as Figures 3b and 4b. The thin sections were prepared by initially vacuum impregnating the thin section portion of the concrete in blue-dyed epoxy. The impregnated surface was ground flat and adhered to the surface of a glass slide. A final sawcut was made within 2 mm of the glass slide surface. The concrete adhered to the glass slide was ground to a thickness of 30 microns to I50 17025 ��a� Testing.Engineering&Consulting Services,Inc "- © 235 Buford Drive I Lawrencevitic GA 30046 s DAD LtDOa"M a . 770-995 8000 1 770-995-SSSO(F) I www.teoeMces.com ""`AO1"' Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT complete the thin sections. The remaining portion no longer adhered to the glass slide, commonly referred to as a billet, was ground and polished. Photos of the polished billets and thin sections are provided as Figures 3a and 4a. The thin sections were examined with a polarized light microscope at magnifications of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400X. Our evaluations were performed in accordance with the applicable sections of ASTM C856, Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete. Our significant petrographic observations are provided below. General Observations The concrete is internally cracked (Figures lb and 2b). Most of the cracks have a "random" pattern. These cracks go through both the aggregate and the paste, indicating that the expansion is related to expansion of the aggregate, although expansion of the cement paste may have also occurred from any associated chemical reactions. Some of the cracks in the cross section of the concrete appear to originate in the coarse aggregate particles. Table 1.Summary of Visual and Petrographic Observations Carbonation Depth Est. Est.Air Surface Treatment Binder for Degradation Core ID (mm) Water/Cement Entrainment Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Concrete Ratio (9'0) Intensity C-04-1U 20 36 None None Cement 0.4/0.65 <0 5 Moderate to retempered strong Too C-04-21. 28 23 Bitumen None Cement deteriorated <0 5 Moderate to r g measurement Notes: (1) Degradation intensity is based on paste hardness,amount of dissolved material and cracking,and amount of secondary deposits. (2) The water cement ratio is a visual estimation and may be difficult to determine due to the severity of the degradation of the paste. Coarse Aggregate Observations • The coarse aggregate is primarily crushed stone comprised of mainly subangular grains of granofels with minor biotite schist, and mafic rocks. A few pieces of natural gravel are present. Major minerals present include garnet, pyrrhotite, pyrite, chlorite, muscovite, biotite, amphiboles, pyroxenes, feldspars, quartz, sillimanite, sericite, and microcrystalline quartz. Pyrrhotite may occur as bands, veins, and small blebs, with some readily oxidized and replaced with goethite and/or hematite. The coarse aggregate appears to be well graded and well distributed with a maximum grain size of Y4" Oxidation and decomposition of the pyrrhotite occurred and resulted in cracking, leaching,and overall degradation of the concrete. • There is a potential for late-slow alkali-silica reactivity (ASR) of the coarse aggregate due to the presence of strained,myrmekitic,and microcrystalline quartz. No ASR gel was observed. Page 2 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Fine Aggregate Observations • The fine aggregate is comprised mainly of manufactured sand. From the mineralogy, the sand appears to originate from the same quarry as the coarse aggregate.The fine aggregate consists of angular grains of quartz, biotite, feldspars, and chunks of pyrrhotite grains. Fine aggregate grains may also be solution-pitted in areas of degradation. The fine aggregate is densely distributed in the paste. Paste Observations • The concrete was made with portland cement. In each of the core samples,the maximum grain size of the cement and the mineralogy indicates a Type I cement. No supplemental cementitious materials such as fly ash or slag were present in the core samples. • Air content is estimated to be—<0.5% but the percentage is difficult to estimate as the air voids may be completely or partially filled with ettringite, or may be completely disintegrated. The concrete is not air entrained and would not expected to be durable in a freeze/thaw environment. • The original water cement ratio (w/c) was low in sample C04-11J, approximately —0.3, then retempered to —0.65. Sample C14-2L was too deteriorated to determine the w/c. Concrete typically is designed with a lower w/c, generally 0.4 to 0.5. The higher w/c ratio would result in lower strengths and durability. • The paste is generally soft,and can be easily scratched with a Moh's Hardness 2 tip,especially in areas where FA grains have been solution-pitted.The paste otherwise is no harder than a Moh's hardness 3. • The paste is of generally of poor quality, disintegrating and often with many voids and cracks that may be traced along cracks leading to an aggregate. Some of the paste may be completely to partially dissolved,and may contain calcite crystallites in the paste. • The aggregate-paste bond is poor, often with a gap. These gaps and cracks may be filled with sulfates such as ettringite. The gaps appear to have formed because of degradation of the cement paste. Pyrrhotite Observations • Pyrrhotite was observed in the aggregate. Almost all (up to 99%) of the coarse aggregate had some amount of pyrrhotite. See Table 2 for calculated count percentage on the coarse aggregate. It is unusual to observe any pyrrhotite in aggregate. These concentrations are unusually high. Page 3 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Table 2.Count of the number of coarse aggregate particles containing any amount of pyrrhotite. House Core ID Pyrrhotite Count CA YES NO % 130 Stonefield C-03-1U 91 1 99 Trail C-03-21- 108 1 99 Average 99 • The amount of pyrrhotite in each aggregate particle varies largely from <1% up to 99%. Varieties of pyrrhotite include whole, massive euhedral pyrrhotite (Figure 5), mm-scale pyrrhotite bands within aggregate (Figure 6), and finely disseminated blebs (Figure 7). It was also observed that massive pyrrhotite grains were present in paste that appear as fine aggregate particles (Figure 8). It is likely that these could be pieces of pyrrhotite that was broken off from the coarse aggregate particles during the crushing and/or mixing of the coarse aggregate. Occasionally, pyrite may occur with pyrrhotite(Figure 9). • Some of the pyrrhotite observed has also oxidized, forming reaction products in the paste, creating distinct "rust" stains associated with cracking, and soft dissolution byproducts (Figures 10— 12). These cracks often originate from the separation planes within the aggregate associated with pyrrhotite (Figures 13, 14), extending into the paste and in and around other aggregate,often creating a separated gap that may be filled with ettringite(Figures 15-16). • The oxidation of pyrrhotite results in the formation of sulfur acids. This may lead to the dissolution and weakening of the paste, and the formation of popcorn calcite (PCD) in the dissolved paste(Figures 17, 18). • Less than 10% of the pyrrhotite is completely oxidized (visual examination). The remaining pyrrhotite has the potential for causing additional detrimental reactions that may further deteriorate the concrete. Page 4 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are based on the review of the provided background information, visual observations of the provided samples, petrographic observations and our experience. • The concrete was of low quality at the time of construction. It was retempered to a higher w/c than originally batched. It also was not air-entrained and would not be freeze/thaw resistant. • The pyrrhotite content in the aggregate is high and unusual. • The deterioration of the concrete in upper and lower levels of the house foundation is due to oxidation of the pyrrhotite in the aggregate. The pyrrhotite in the aggregate oxidizes and reacts with the paste, leading to the dissolution of the paste, internal cracking, and formation of ettringite. • Less than 10% of the pyrrhotite is completely oxidized, with the remaining pyrrhotite having a potential for causing additional detrimental reactions that may further deteriorate the concrete. CLOSING Testing, Engineering and Consulting Services, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide our professional services for this important project. If you have any questions regarding this report,or if we can be of further assistance please contact us at 770-995-5000. Sincerely, TESTING,ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. Steven J.Stokowski,P.G., Aisyah Abdkahar Principal Petrographer Project Geologist GA Professional Geologist No. 606 Attachments: Figures la—22 (Scans and Photomicrographs) Appendix I, List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Appendix II, Discussion on Pyrrhotite in Concrete Page 5 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC I5-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT V41- If j?"x77 - `�' i:- ` +� Yam= i t� • � f A. !f 1 x 1 l 1 f WORLD STANDARD IN MATERIAL TESTING •woos� Figure la. Digital scan of sawn polished longitudinal sections of Core ID "C-04-11J". Outside to left, up at top of image. low- � .� • �� �� .- . -.ems ,1. III I fill 1111firl f s a • • VY(=STANDARD IN AM1H"TESTING AA 4"17 Figure lb. Digital scan of sawn polished longitudinal sections of Core ID "C-04-11J" with major cracks highlighted in red. Outside to left, up at top of image. Page 6 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT 40 • 1 ' y '4 fWd WORLD STANDARD IN MATERIAL.TESTING *A3406-7 Figure 2a. Digital scan of sawn polished longitudinal sections of Core ID "C-04-2L". Outside to right, up at top of image. 10 IM i r'.1 t "•Y 4 '' aw 4 y i (r• yya < .y. p' « 1 WORLD STANDARD IN MATERIAL TESTING *^Idwv Figure 2b. Digital scan of sawn polished longitudinal sections of Core ID "C-04-2L" with major cracks highlighted in red. Outside to right, up at top of image. Page 7 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT t: 14 V Z3\ B Figure 3a. Digital scan of polished billets and thin sections of Core ID "C-04- 1U". See Figure 3b for orientation and location of samples. TOP C-04-1 U t z m z B o A A Figure 3b. Sketch of locations of the thin section of Core ID "C-04-1U". Page 8 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT a v 4 ~ � Y v s La B n Figure 4a. Digital scan of polished billets and thin sections of Core ID "C-04- 2L". See Figure 4b for orientation and location of samples. TOP C-04-2L t A 0 W z B ti Figure 4b. Sketch of locations of the thin section of Core ID "C-04-2L". Page 9 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT S M Figure 5. Photomicrograph of massive pyrrhotite grain as part of an aggregate from the upper core. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). .or a Figure 6. Photomicrograph of banded pyrrhotite in an aggregate from the upper core. Red arrows point to pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). Page 10 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Ar IF f r` t i f� '•Y Figure 7. Photomicrograph of fine grained disseminated pyrrhotite in an aggregate from the upper core. Red arrows point to bronze flecks of pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). .25 nrn/ Figure 8. Photomicrograph of pyrrhotite occurring as a fine aggregate particle from the upper core.The particle may be from a coarse aggregate particle that may have flaked off. Red arrows point to pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). Page 11 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04-130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT MW Figure 9. Photomicrograph of pyrrhotite occurring with pyrite in an aggregate particle from the upper core. Red arrows point to pyrrhotite, yellow arrows point to pyrite. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). D e.nt Figure 10. Photomicrograph of an oxidizing pyrrhotite grain leaching into the paste with distinctive "rust" stains from the upper core. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). Page 12 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT y; s M ii► 1 q � .0 mm,'di Figure 11. Photomicrograph of a partially disintegrated aggregate in the upper core due to oxidizing of pyrrhotite leading to cracks in the aggregate and paste. Red arrows show cracking. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). x- r, x 0 mmi Figure 12. Photomicrograph of a partially disintegrated aggregate in the upper core due to oxidizing of pyrrhotite leading to cracks in the aggregate and paste. Red arrows show pyrrhotite, yellow arrows show cracking. (Photomicrograph of polished section obtained in oblique reflected light with digital microscope). Page 13 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT sou Figure 13. Photomicrograph of internal separation planes and cracking from pyrrhotite oxidation in a granofels coarse aggregate, from Slide B of the upper core. Red arrows point to cracks, yellow arrows point to pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in plane polarized transmitted light (PPL) with the polarized light microscope (PLM)). Figure 14. Photomicrograph of internal separation planes and cracking from pyrrhotite oxidation in a granofels coarse aggregate, from Slide B of the upper core. Red arrows point to cracks, yellow arrows point to pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of thin section Page 14 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT obtained in reflected light with the polarized light microscope (PLM)). Reflected light image of figure 13. Page 15 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT wo a� Figure 15. Photomicrograph of gap around the aggregate from cracking and expansion due to pyrrhotite oxidation from Slide A, lower core. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in plane polarized transmitted light (PPL) with the polarized light microscope (PLM)). •f` t � t� y- Figure 16. Photomicrograph of gap around the granofels aggregate from cracking and expansion due to pyrrhotite oxidation from Slide A, lower core. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in cross-polarized transmitted light (XPL) with the polarized light microscope(PLM)).XPL of Figure 15. Page 16 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT 100 Figure 17. Photomicrograph of porous paste evidenced by strong absorption of blue epoxy dye from Slide B of the lower core. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in plane polarized transmitted light(PPL)with the polarized light microscope(PLM)). Figure 18. Photomicrograph of porous paste evidenced by strong absorption of blue epoxy dye from Slide B of the lower core. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in cross-polarized transmitted light (XPL) with the polarized light microscope (PLM)). XPL of Figure 17. Page 17 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No. TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT i E ^a e b � r ,wdn Figure 19. Photomicrograph of biotite schist coarse aggregate from Slide A of the lower core. Red arrows show pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in plane polarized transmitted light(PPL)with the polarized light microscope(PLM)). e' Figure 20. Photomicrograph of biotite schist coarse aggregate from Slide A of the lower core. Red arrows show pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in cross- polarized transmitted light(XPL)with the polarized light microscope (PLM)). XPL of Figure 19. Page 18 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonef eld Trail,South Windsor,CT s Figure 21. Photomicrograph of partially dissolved aggregate from Slide A of the lower core. Note the void space of high absorption of blue epoxy dye in aggregate (yellow arrows). Red arrows point to pyrrhotite. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in plane polarized transmitted light(PPL)with the polarized light microscope(PLM)). . a Figure 22. Photomicrograph of partially dissolved aggregate from Slide A, lower core. (Photomicrograph of thin section obtained in cross-polarized transmitted light (XPL)with the polarized light microscope(PLM)).XPL of Figure 21. Page 19 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 StoneFeld Trail,South Windsor,CT Appendix LIST OF ACRONYI1IS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAR Alkali-Aggregate Reaction or Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity ACI American Concrete Institute ACR Alkali-Carbonate Reaction or Alkali-Carbonate Reactivity ASR Alkali-Silica Reaction or Alkali-Silica Reactivity ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials CA Coarse Aggregate CH Calcium Hydroxide CSH Calcium Silicate Hydrate FA Fine Aggregate GGBFS Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag Gyp Gypsum. Usually refers to the Gypsum,or First Order, late used with a petrographic microscope HCC Hydraulic Cement Concrete ITZ Interface Transition Zone P/EF Polarizin E ifluorescence PCA Portland Cement Association PCC Portland Cement Concrete(more inclusive term HCC, above,is used throughout) PCD Popcorn Calcite Deposition, internal carbonation of cement paste with deposition of calcite crystallites after acidic dissolution of cement paste. pH The negative log of the activity of the hydrogen ion in water PLM Polarized-Light Microscopy or Polarized-Light Microscope PPL Plane-Polarized Light UEA Undulatory Extinction Angle UV Ultra-Violet Light,Typically Short Wave,Causes Fluorescence w/cm Water to Cementitious Material Ratio w/c Water to Cement Ratio XPL Cross-Polarized Light Page 20 of 21 Report of Petrographic Evaluation March 7,2016 Investigation of Concrete Residential Foundations TEC Services Project No.TEC 15-6043.2 House:C-04—130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Appendix II DISCUSSION ON PYRRHOTITE DEGRADATION IN CONCRETE Pyrrhotite, with a chemical formula of Fe(l_x)SZ, is an iron sulfide mineral that is naturally occurring in various igneous and metamorphic rocks. Pyrrhotite, under atmospheric conditions, is an unstable mineral, especially when exposed to oxygen and water. Pyrrhotite oxidizes readily when first exposed to water and oxygen, which may occur as early as the quarrying process. It breaks down, expansively cracks, and forms iron oxides and hydroxides, along with other minerals, usually sulfates,when the acid and sulfate ion formed during the oxidation of pyrrhotite reads with the components in the concrete. The deterioration of the concrete is known as internal sulfate attack. It is the cause of expansive cracking within the cement paste due to the formation of ettringite, gypsum, and thaumasite as well as further propagating any existing cracks, and perhaps degrading some of the aggregate and paste thus affecting the strength and integrity of the concrete. The oxidation products of pyrrhotite may also yield a larger volume than the original mineral,causing surface pop-outs in addition to expansion and pattern cracking. Pyrite, FeSZ, another common sulfide mineral that may also be found in aggregate, behaves in a similar way, but reads much slower than pyrrhotite. Page 21 of 21 GEODESIGN,INC. REQUEST FOR LABOR 1TORY SERVICESREQUES7'FOR LABORATORY SERVICES/Chain of Custody Project Name: 130 Stonefield Trail Page I of I Location(t'uwn.Rfate):South Windsor,CT Date Samples Submitted 1 2/2 112 0 1 5 VIA FEDEX Ground GeoDesign File No.:3821-001 04 Date Results Requested ASAP Client/Company Name:GeoDesign,Inc Samples Collected By RJB Contact Name:U1nch LaFosse.P F, Date(s)Samples Collected 12/15/2015 Contact Phone/Fax'203-758-8836 ext 105 ROCK SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IDENTIFICATION TESTS STRENGTH CONSOLIDATION COMPACTION OTHER i C u � u s m D o h U o d oo h v C 'O r VI 1 v ° p v u 3 10Un o CDu • " P E r F" E Tt 1 g a H w s '+ '+ h Z o a o y D E ' u A u Q vi vi of 3 B o o u a v u � c v E u p .o ,rz o o `o ° w' Q u m U m ,o E 4 U .� '3 72 v v 2 F m u —' 3 0 o u o o v w w a 0.,E °u E E u o ,� u w 'o c 7 o o u o 0 0 u o M H Q' _ v� -r 'n C-04-1 U 16 #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 1 46 C-04-1 L #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 2 17 C-04-2U #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 2 C-04-21- 46 #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 1 #of Tests #of Tests #of Tests Test Totals 6 Cut 10-inch cores in half as needed to allow assigned testing =� Samples Submitted to TEC,235 Buford Drive,Lawrenceville GA 30046 Attention Steven Stokowski,Jr. G E O 0 t s 1 o N Submitted BY Rob Brautigam Date 12/21/2015 'rimed Fame 984 Southford Road, Middlebury CT 06762 Phone:203-758-8836 Fax:203-758-8842 .Samples Received By Date 'raced!Came Request for Lab Senim Appendix 4 Foundation Concrete Core Strength Testing Results Venso M■TEC Services 2J5120 3 /5/2013 .M Te5u4- V-cormAmm T037 Report of ASTNI C 42-13 Concrete Core Compressive Strength Determination Client: GeoDesign Date January 29,2016 Project Name: Connecticut Foundations/Pyrhottite Lab Number. C-04-2U Date of Coring: December 15,2015 Project Number. TEC 15-6043 2 Date of Placement Unknown Location: 130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Specified Strength: n/a Age at Testing: Unknown Sample Curing: n/a Machine Used: Test Mark Marc Agg.Size: 3/4" Calipers: TEC#2398 Obtained By: GeoDesign Orientation of Cores: 901 to concrete surface Loading Rate: 35 fpm Core Length Sawed Dry Density Capped Maximum Correction Compressive Fracture Sample 1D Date Tested Diameter(in) Weight(g) Area(in.) LD Ratio t (in.) Length(in) (pct) Length(in) Load(Ibtl Factor Strength(Psi) Type C-04-2U-A 1213V2015 3.69 10.29 4.77 1998.1 nd 4.93 10.69 39666 1.330 0.940 3490 2 C-04-2U-B 1131_015 3.69 10.29 4.83 1998.1 nd 5.10 10.69 40075 1.380 0.946 3550 3 Average 3520 Note 1-Fractures types are per AS]M C39-12. Note 2-The cores have a wavy surface that may reduce the measured strength. Note 3-The ends of the core samples were wet sawed on 01/05/2016 at 17:30.When samples were visibly dry the samples were sulfur capped on 1/11/2016 and kept in the 50%Humidity Room until time of testing on 01/1212016. The test results presented only pertain to the samples tested. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report please feel free to contact the undersigned. Tested By: Chip Sherwood Reviewed By: Steven J Stokowski T esnml Ingne ing S Con"tin3 Servsres Inc. 23S EUord Urtve I LrwrenceMle,GA 30046 770.995-8000 1 770.99S8S50(F)I w Jw -%nvtces.cam TEC 5ervices Verison3 z/sr_o 13 .- Te5&g- -CcrtsubV T037 Report of ASTAI C 42-13 Concrete Core Compressive Strength Determination Client: GeoDesign Date January 29,2016 Project Name: Connecticut Foundations/Pyrhottite lab Number. G"I L Date of Conng: December 15,2015 Project Number. TEC 15-6043 2 Date of Placement Unknown Location: 130 Stonefield Trail,South Windsor,CT Specified Strength: n/a Age at Testing: Unknown Sample Curing: Na Machine Used: Test Mark Max Agg.Size: 3/4" Calipers. TEC#2398 Obtained By: GeoDesign Orientation of Cores: 901 to concrete surface Loading Rate: 35 fpm Core Length Sawed Dry Density Capped Maximum Correction Compressive Fracture Sample ID Date Tested Diameter(in) (in.) Length(in) Weight(g) (pcf) Length(in) Area(in.) Load(IbO LD Ratio Factor Strength(psi) Type' C-04-IL-A 11312015 3.69 10.34 4.96 19932 nd 5.13 10.69 38034 1.380 0.946 3360 3 C-04-1L-B 12/31,2015 3.69 10.34 4.87 1975.7 nd 5.03 10.69 40468 1.360 0.943 3570 3 Average 3465 Note I-Fractures types are per ASTM C39-12. Note 2-The cores have a wavy surface that may reduce the measured strength. Note 3-The ends of the core samples were wet sawed on O1,052016 at 17:30.When samples were visibly dry the samples were sulfur capped on 1/11/2016 and kept in the 50916 Humidity Room until time oftesting on 01/12/1-016. The test results presented only pertain to the samples tested. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project if you have any questions regarding this report please feel free to contact the undersigned. Tested By: Chip Sherwood Reviewed By: Steven] Stokowski Tesnr.ry Engineering S Cornulwrg Serves,trx�. Z3S tiudotd Drive I L.*wrencevale.GA 30046 770-99"000 1 770-995S"o(FJ I www.tecsmnceicam GEODESIGN,INC. REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICESREQIIEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES/Chain of Custody Project Name 130 Stonefield Trail Page 1 of 1 Location(Toxn,Stale) South Windsor,CT Date Samples Submitted 12/21/2015 VIA FEDEX Ground (ieoDesign File No.:3821-001 04 Date Results Requested ASAP Client/Company Name:GeoDesibm,Inc Samples Collected By RJB Contact Name.lunch LaFosse.P E Date(s)Samples Collected 12/15/2015 Contact Phone/Fax 203-758-8836 ext105 ROCK SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IDENTIFICATION TESTS STRENGTH CONSOLIDATION COMPACTION OT11ER c as r eu ° o 10 U u o o , U u t u ° c g c c E >~ 7 F c o u b V) u c o o Y In >. U �° Q U U r 3 a o r N t4 u E i y 3 y f A o 6uU o 't S 2� z o o73 • u 4] A d E o v u Q N vS ei 3 1 0 o u C7 U U $ F- c c ❑ c 15 Q ,o W urn $! Z c u v a9 E o ,o o .o p a u N Q ~ u In u o u y Uu m U eb o —' K IE o a 3 0 o v c 3 " 3 u = u c 2 L ° `2 P a E b E u on vi 10 `� o c 5 - o o u o o `.3 ° c w u o C-04-1 U 16 #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 1 C-04-1 L 46 #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 2 C-04-2U 17 #of Tests 4"Core x 10" 1 2 C-04-21- 469 of Tests 4"Core x 10" 1 #of Tests #of Tests #of Tests Test Totals 6 Cut 10-inch cores in half as needed to allow assigned testing =� 2 Samples Submitted to TEC,235 Buford Drive,Lawrenceville GA 30046 Attention Steven Stokowski,Jr. �111x1, G E o o ■ s 1 O H 1 N C U R • O 0. A T e D Submitted By Rob Brautigam Dote 12/21/2015 'rrnred A'ume 984 Southford Road, Middlebury CT 06762 Phone:203-758-8836 Fax:203-758-8842 Sand les Received By Date 'rimed Name Request for Lab Senices Appendix 5 Soil Testing Results FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. ORD 6100 HILLCROFT HOUSTON,TEXAS 77081 PHONE(713)369-5400 FAX(713)369-5518 RESULTS OF TESTS PROJECT: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT REPORT DATE: 01-12-16 (GTX304201) CLIENT NUMBER: JOB NUMBER: 04.1116-0003 FOR: GEOTESTING EXPRESS,INC. REPORT NUMBER: 125 NAGOG PARK ACTION,MA 01720 DATE SAMPLED: TIME SAMPLED: REPORTED TO: ETHAN MARRO SAMPLED BY: CLIENT DATE RECEIVED: 01-08-16 TIME RECEIVED: 1100 SOLUBLE SULFATE ASTM D-516 ** RECEIVED BY: SD SAMPLE ID RESULTS UNITS LAB No. I TIME/DATE ANALYST B-1, S-2, 3—5' < 100* mg/kg mg/kg 0108034 0930/01-12-16 7S757-71 B-1, S-3, 5—7' < 100 * mg/kg 1 0108035 0930/01-12-16 1SD B-2, S-2, 3—5' 370 * mg/kg 1 0108036 0930/01-12-16 1 SD B-2, S-3, 5 —7' 202 * mg/kg 1 0108037 0930/01-12-16 1 SD SO4 004-16 Respectfully submitted, Dry weight basis Steve DeGregorio Chemist SD ••WATER EXTRACTION PERFORMED BY USING A 1:10 RATIO OF SAMPLE AND REAGENT WATER FOLLOWED BY CENTRIFUGE AND VACUUME FILTRATION. THE WATER EXTRACT IS THEN ANALYZED USING THE ASTM D-512 AND D-516 METHODS. THE RESULTS RELATE AS TO THE LOCATION TESTED AND NO OTHER REFERENCE SHALL BE MADE. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. END OF REPORT GeoT s n�g E x P n E S S SOIL CHAIN OF CUSTODY & TEST REQUEST GeoTesting Express,Inc. CLIENT INVOICE(complete If different from Client 125 Nagog Park Acton,MA 01720 Com an :a-,P,IR Company 800 434 1062 Toll Free Address:oewsa.+me— Address: 978 635 0266 Fax City,State,ZI :µ-*n,oroen2 City,State,Zip Contact:-*- Phone:2 W3137077 Contact: Phone: E-mail:ftWw-o"—w- Cell:ma+span E-mail: Cell: 2358 Perimeter Park Drive,Suite 320 PROJECT Atlanta,GA 30341 Project Name:+oosaawrlaw Client Project#:MI oa+•a4 Purchase Order#: 770 645 6575 Tel Project Location:South Windsor,CT GTX Sales Order#: Requested Turnaround:Standard 770 645 6570 Fax On-site Contact: E-mail: Phone: www.geotesting.com gr D 13 SOIL S 000 E N� s � e c = o E ply gyp, E qo n N 430 8 CV �!V Y ('00 O L I f tnS.q 'a t'a Ca a uG 8V' U 6 �9 C C I I I C BoringID Sample 10 Depth ;Q `� c R 2 k 0 0 B-1 S-2 T-5' X B-1 S-3 5'-7' X B-2 S-2 T-5' X B-2 S-3 5'-7' X 'Specify Test Conditions(Undisturbed or Remolded,Density and moisture,Test Normal Loads,Test Confining Stresses,etc.): AUTHORIZE BY SIGNI G rDD NG.. I For arxU.eosty Robert Brautigam 12/21/15 Incoming Sample Inspection Performed❑ SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: DATE: Adverse conditions: Relinquished By: DATE: Received By: DATE: TIME: TIME: Relinquished By: DATE: Received By: DATE: TIME: TIME: Appendix 6 Limitations LIMITATIONS 1. The scope of GeoDesign's services was intended to evaluate soil conditions adjacent to the residence and concrete conditions of representative exposed foundations.The findings submitted in this report are based in part upon the data obtained from subsurface explorations and concrete foundation cores performed at the locations indicated. If subsurface variations between these explorations and/or coring locations become evident,a re-evaluation of the findings in this report may become necessary after GeoDesign has had an opportunity to observe the characteristics of the conditions encountered. 2. Water level readings have been made in the drill holes and/or wells at times and under conditions stated on the boring logs. These data have been reviewed and interpretations have been made in the text of this report. However,it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, and other factors occurring since the time measurements were made. 3. The scope of our services did not include any environmental assessment or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater, or surface water within or beyond the studied site. 4. Except as noted in this report, no quantitative laboratory testing was performed as part of our services. Where such analyses have been conducted by outside laboratories, GeoDesign has relied upon the data provided,and has not conducted an independent evaluation of the reliability of these data. GeoDesign is not responsible for the findings and conclusions made by others based on their data. 5. Testing was performed in general accordance with recognized testing methods and guidelines; minor procedural variations that are not expected to affect the findings in this report may have been taken. 6. This report should be read in its entirety to gain a complete understanding of the information provided, and aid in any decisions made or actions taken, based on the information contained in this report. 7. This report has been prepared by GeoDesign for the exclusive use of A. E. Oberhaus, Inc. and their consultants and/or client for specific application to the residence referenced in this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. PERMITS/INSP PAYMENT RECPT# 20909609 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 DATE: 01/13/20 TIME: 13 26 CLERK: morganami DEPT: CUSTOMER#: 704760 LAROCHE BUILDERS PARCEL: CHG: BLDPRM BUILDING PERMIT 20 28 AMOUNT PAID: 20 28 PAID BY: LAROCHE BUILDERS PAYMENT METH: CHECK 10529 REFERENCE: 130 STONEFIE AMT TENDERED: 20 28 AMT APPLIED: 20 28 CHANGE: 00 2000009 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 01/17/2020 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 20.28 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201902985 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: LAROCHE BUILDERS ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 41 CONVERSE STREET', OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL STAFFORD SPRINGS,CT 06076 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: PARTIAL FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT EDUCATIONAL FEE... SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/[7/2020 11:45 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 2000058 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 02/18/2020 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 324.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 202000190 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: LAROCHE BUILDERS ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 41 CONVERSE STREET OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S r 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL STAFFORD SPRINGS;CT 06076 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 16'X 14'SCREENED PORCH y SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 2/18/2020 1 I:48 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 201500179 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION DATE: 12/03/2015 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 10.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201401827 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: LAROCHE BUILDERS ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 41 CONVERSE STREET OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S STAFFORD SPRINGS,CT 06076 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPAIR FAILING FOUNDATION. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 12/3/2015 10:34 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 202000500 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION DATE: 07/07/2020 FEE: GIS ID: 86100130 ZONE: MUNIS APPLICATION# 201902985 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL UNDER APPLICATION NUMBER 201902985 CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONNECTICUT BASIC BUILDING CODE AND THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR AND IS HEREBY APPROVED OF OCCUPANCY AS INDICATED BELOW: ` APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY PARTIAL FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT SPECIAL CONDITIONS NOTICE: IF THIS CERTIFICATE IS LOST OR DESTROYED,A DUPLICATE SHOULD BE OBTAINED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/14/2021 9:40 AM ANY CHANGE OR EXTENSION OF THE USE HEREIN APPROVED REQUIRES ANEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1500235 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 06/02/2015 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 1616.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201401827 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT _ -. LOCATION NAME: LAROCHE BUILDERS = ` -ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 41 CONVERSE STREET OWNER:- ,1BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S STAFFORD SPRINGS,CT 06076, - 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 - F DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPAIR FAILING FOUNDATION. a SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ' a ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS'APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 6/2/2015 3:36 PM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 1500033 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 01/29/2015 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 30.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201500066 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT LOCATION NAME: C-TECH SOLAR ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 542 HOPMEADOW STREET OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S PMB 130 ' 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SIMSBURY,CT 06070 SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: INSTALLATION OF ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY. a a. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/29/2015 10:27 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE 1500017 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT PERMIT NUMBER ELECTRICAL PERMIT DATE: 01/29/2015 GIS ID: 86100130 FEE: 495.00 MUNIS APPLICATION# 201500066 BUILDING DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT, LOCATION NAME: C-TECH SOLAR ADDRESS: 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL ADDRESS: 542 HOPMEADOW STREET OWNER: BOUDLE GARVIN G&JOAN S PMB 130 130 STONEFIELD TRAIL SIMSBURY,CT 06076 SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: ELECTRICAL WORK FOR AN INSTALLATION OF A SOLAR PV ROOF MOUNT. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICATION AND PLANS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: BUILDING OFFICIAL 1/29/2015 10:27 AM THE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES A$0.26 PER THOUSAND CT STATE EDUCATION SURCHARGE