The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About103 BUCKLAND RD BUCK LAND ROAD OLD STREET LINE (EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY) M -•—I YY RE LINE 100 ± o W) o In v' v� ? O. OLD BUILDING LINE (u �iu 2 O NEW BUILDING LIN �v 4,- _ U O Q HOUSE ? = ek 103 p oO O 2 +� IAJ U 4u (0 t/ _ Q O U U o O N 4)_ \ U � NEW LOT AREA S.F. O OLD LOT :.tea 12,200-.S.F 17/ 94 Z 100, ± PLOT PLAN SHOWING LAND OF RUDOLPH G. MILDRED L. ELIASSON I hereby certify this map to be a substantiallyc�.-e.F�..e�r correct Class "D" map which has been compiled from maps supplied by the Town of South Windsor and Buckland Road construction plans prepared by Petersen & Hoffman, April 1973. This lot is nonconforming to current RR zoning regulations for building setback and lot area requirements. �1,00*vvvrh►s (,L'N % p, oo r T GRISWOLD &. FUSS , INC . CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS J MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT ' 4 :SCALE 1 = 40' PROJ. NO. 74- 71—D22 DATE: MARCH 15, 1974 �`�'f b f .,. - �� II r it' i i 1 ' ,� � I 1 { I 61 60 59 803.36 r9 nD ' o � O ss o < 0 Fn zcn ►v c 0 i N c _ _rn w rc's � z o mz_ c � �6) •s� O� ww � 3r�3) sS� 2859? SAS r CQi cO Doti o° �Z\IV `Z LL'SZ 28 05 281.05 29 oti� d '1 r tom. ,r � ,'.+�� >, � .tit ' �w� ' �• -.c 4 ' Ate ,; .47Ac. , A ) , i �� ,. ,�: � J yf�y'"a t.:.z± .�Aid' ; .i,•:� n r J 1 fgoeosEo / � g OCT 0 1992 South Windsor BUILDING DEPARTMENT A. and stale laws and s 0i :—i-s as e (I oY the G°ailding (?-pnrt m+•M dufing i, eY o' this application and final issuanc of a C,i,IOg lfnrmit. Signed This plan Is approved subs' , o the eor,4it�o at •�rtl,-rs and ordinances regu! ng buikjmg sna. r+e < „plied with. paditionally Approve4 These fi,ed :�,n,:i! Sanding Inspeoto.( u t No tlp: -1IFICAJION OF ZOivlivu L-�i,ii Proposed building(s), use(s) and/or strixtu, ?go?05EC� as shown ort this plan appear(s) to be D£c�. Conformance with current South Wind tegulations. Variances and special exception. Wnay, apply.. pcT �a 5 191 Z � ,, g Enforcement Offlcer 200'± OLD LOT AREA = 82 ,900t S.F. N EW LOT A REA = 81 , 000 t S.F. 19 / 94 Y (n ' 3 Q Y Q U E- Q +I �I 0. _ {J 0 0 1 v v , I o Q 0 _ v J I _J I 3 1 z z J 0 W W_ Q LL 1*1 HOUSE z dk 116 NEW BUILDING LINE OLD BUILDING LINE O O � 1 NEW STREET LINE 200' L IRON OLD STREET LINE I EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY ) - -- BUCKLAND ROAD I hereby certify this map to be a substantially correct Class "D" Mar) which has been compiled PLOT PLAN from maps supplied by the Town of South Windsor and Fucktand Road construction plans prepared SHOWING LAND OF by Petersen & Hoffman, April 1973. This lot is nonconforming to current &A-30 zonin-, W I L L I AM F. P E R RO T T A regulations for buUctin,_setback requirements. , rsa� s 2a£33► GRISWOLD & FUSS , INC . ru ��''"��fs�f'• ewe CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS LMANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT q (7L) SCALE- 1 = 40 PROD. NO. 74-71-D15 DATE. MARCH 15 , 1974 - i -r. ,..---- - - r-- __ _ _ f i I STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPAR TMENT OF CONSTR UCTION SERVICES 9°V OFFICE OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL December 07, 2015 Mr. Mark Woodcock SCANNED BUCKLAND ROAD ASSOCIATES 30 Kennedy Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: FM-0312-15 116 BUCKLAND ROAD APARTMENTS 116 BUCKLAND ROAD, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Dear Mr. Woodcock; Based upon additional information from the Local Fire Marshal, the Office of State Fire Marshal has re-evaluated our decision in the matter of Modification Request FM-0312-15 dated November 24, 2015 in the matter of dimensional criteria for existing Secondary Means of Escape Windows within an existing apartment occupancy. In accordance with Section 29-296 of the Connecticut General Statutes, this request seeks to permit existing double hung windows to remain as the Secondary Means of Escape Windows from the bedrooms of Apartment 1 and Apartment 3 within this Existing Two Story, Four Dwelling Unit Apartment Building. This request seeks to permit an existing window from each of the effected bedrooms to have a clear opening height of 20 inches where a minimum height of 22 inches is required and that provides a clear width of 28 inches with a building opening height of 43 inches is ACCEPTABLE. This decision is based that the clear and building openings exceed the minimum square footage criteria for Secondary Means of Escape Windows. Evaluated by JLD Decision Endorsed by: William Abbott STATE FIRE MARSHAL U C: Fire Marshal Water Sommers; TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR "In accordance with Connecticut General Statute 29-309, any person determined to have the right to appeal may appeal the decision of the State Fire Marshal in this matter to the State Codes&Standards Committee within thirty (30)days after receipt." State Codes&Standards Committee 165 Capitol Avenue Room 265 Hartford,CT 06106 Tel:860-713-5750 STATE OF CONNECTICUT Department of Administrative Services Division of Construction Services Office of State Fire Marshal MODIFICATION REQUEST# FM-0312-15 PROJECT NAME: TWO STORY/FOUR DWELLING UNITS EmSTING APARTMENT OCCUPANCY ADDRESS: 116 BUCKLAND ROAD Town: SOUTH WINDSOR ATE FIRE MARSHAL STATE n In accordance with Section 29-296 of the Connecticut General Statutes,the decision of the Office of the State Fire Marshal in this matter is: This modification request seeks relief to Part IV; Section 24.2.2.3(C) of the 2005 Connecticut State Fire Safety Code, as amended August 01, 2009 and October 02, 2012 (CSFSC); to permit existing double hung windows to remain as the Secondary Means of Escape Windows,from the Bedrooms of Apartment 1 and Apartment 3 within this Existing Two Story, Four Dwelling Unit Apartment Building. This request is to permit an existing window from each of the effected bedrooms, to have a clear opening height of not less than 20 inches, and that provides a clear width of not less than 28 inches, with a total clear height of 43 inches (if both sash's where to be removed), to be considered as a Secondary Means of Escape is RETURNED WITHOUT ACTION. This decision is based that the clear opening dimensions, meet and/or exceed the minimum dimensional criteria for new emergency escape and rescue windows for construction, under the requirements of the CSFSC Part III, Sections.1025.1 and 1025.2. Evaluated by JLD J Reviewed by: -04�` Joseph.Kingston �Decision endorsed by: _ ,{��,(./€t� f''" William Abbott State Fire Marshal Date: NoVGio o?0 S "In accordance with Connecticut General Statute 29-309, any person determined to have the right to appeal may appeal the decision of the State Fire Marshal in this matter to the State Codes&Standards Committee within thirty(30)days after receipt."State Codes&Standards Committee 165 Capitol Avenue,Room 265 Hartford,CT 06106 Tel:860-713-5900,Fax 860-713-7410 DPS-0927-C Rev.1/2001 - ------- ----- State of Connecticut, Department of Public Safety j ; Division of Fire, Emergency&Building Services ' Office of State Fire Marshal , APPLICATION FOR REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF A FIRE SAFETY RFq.8"A oT 2015 ES YY ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 541 OF THE CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUT [_Keference No. Facility Name: 116 Buckland Road Apartments — + Facility Address: 116 Buckland Road South Windsor Connecticut 06074 Number Street City State Zip Facility Owner: Buckland Road Associates Telephone: (860)604-6442 Owner's Address: P.O. Box 684 South Windsor CT 06074 um r e zip Applicant's Name: Mark Woodcock Telephone:(860)604-6442 Applicant's Address: 30 Kennedy Road South Windsor CT 06074 Number Street city State ZIP Contact Person: Mark Woodcock Telephone:Work(860)528-4144 Cell(860)604-6442 ` Type of Facility: 4-Family Apartment Building .� This Facility is: ❑ New; ® Existing; ❑ Renovation; Date of Construction: 1850 , Date of Present Use: 1850 Previous modifications for this Facility: ❑ Unknown; ® No;❑ Yes, Modification Numbers: i ❑ Check if a Modification Request to the State Building Code is being submitted to the Office of State Building Inspector. I,the above named applicant,being a lawful agent of the owner, request modification/relief from a requirement of the CT: ❑ Moving Picture Theater Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-109 ❑ Gas Equipment&Piping Code pursuant to ❑ Amusements/Tent and Portable Shelter Codes pursuant to C.G.S.§29-329(c) 1 C.G.S.§29-140 ❑ Liquefied Petroleum Gas&Liquefied Natural Gas Code ® State Fire Safety Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-296 pursuant to C.G.S.§29-333 ❑ Oil Burning Equipment Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-317(c) ❑ Hazardous Chemical Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-338 ❑ Fireworks and Special Effects Code pursuant to ❑ Flammable&Combustible Liquids Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-357(c) C.G.S.§29-321 ❑ Model Rocketry Code pursuant to C.G.S.§29-368 For the requirement as prescribed in: Regulation Number: CSFSC Standard: Part IV Section Number: _Chapter 24 Section 2.2.3 29.292-8d,29-317-1b (If Applicable) NFPA 30,NFPA 54,etc Identify Section Number I request this modification/relief due to the following reasons: ® Equivalent Alternative ® Practical Difficulty ❑ Requirements Unwarranted Descnbs area of nonconformance with the appropriate regulation,b location in the facility,and a brief description why code compliance cannot be achieved,sp"dimensions as applicable. Apartment 1 -Apartment 1 is a one-bedroom,second floor apartment.The windows in the bedroom do not meet the secondary means of escape requirements as outlined in the CSFSC(see photos and sketches attached on separate sheet). Apartment 3 -Apartment 3 is a one-bedroom,first floor apartment.The window in thebedroom of Apartment B does not meet the secondary means of escape requirements as outlined in the CSFSC(see photos and sketches attached on separate sheet). ® Separate Sheet Attached Side of I intend to provide the following safeguard(s)as an alternative measure to secure public safety in lieu of strict compliance with the requirement of the CSFSC,Part IV,Chapter 24 Section 2.2.3 noted above: Insert Name of KeglutatiOn for wn crI ModjyjcaljorvKeuefs emg eques a an se on o egrilill5n Apartment 1 -In Apartment 1 I intend to install DC smoke alarms that are interconnected wirelessly* (see product info attached on separate sheet). I will install two(2)of these smoke alarms in the living area and one (1)inside the bedroom in question(see Apartment 1 sketch attached). Apartment 2-In Apartment 21 intend to install DC smoke alarms that are interconnected wirelessly* (see product info attached on separate sheet). I will install two(2)of these smoke alarms in the living area and one (1)inside the bedroom in question(see Apartment 2 sketch attached). * The technology in these smoke alarms allows them to communicate wirelessly like interconnected AC smoke alarms. When one smoke alarm activates,all of the smoke alarms in the apartment will alarm. ® Separate Sheet Attached In addition the following are enclosed ® Plans/Drawings/Sketches; ®Photographs; ® Product Data Sheets ❑Supplement Information Sheet ❑Other as necessary for clarification of the information provided. ,, s1 , , , Applicant s Signature Telephone Number Date FOR LOCAL FIRE MARSHAL USE I, ®Support, ❑Do NOT Support, this Request for Modification to Connecticut CSFSC, Part IV,Chapter 24.2.2.3 ; Identify Code by Name;Le.Fire Safety Code,Oil Burning Equip Code Regulation of Connecticut State Agency Insert nclusive;as identified above to Section Insertregulation Number i.e.I.s.24292-ed,2911-Sa,etc , because of the following reasons: Identify code flow I.e.occupancy chapter,core chapter as applicable I feel that the building owner's proposed modifications meet the intent of the CSFSC and will provide the occupants with early notification in the event of a fire. ❑ Separate Sheet Attached Walter Summers `6�~,�� ; k 860-282-0669 EXT 4 q �: �� Fire Marshal Revi e s Signature I Title Telephone Number Dale // ❑ Contact me regarding this Request. STATE FIRE MARSHAL The response of the Commissioner of Public Safety/State Fire Marshal to this request in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes§29 9 is attached on a separate sheet. is Initials Sde2of3 l r APPLICATION FOR REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF A FIRE SAFETY REGULATION SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION SHEET If Modification request is for a building or structure,please complete the following: Date of Construction: 1850 Date of Occupancy for Present Use: 1850 Number of Stories(Above grade) 2 Dimension/Area Per Floor: 1st Floor= 1,424 sq ft 2"d Floor= 1,424 sq ft Attic: ❑ Full Basement—#of Levels: ® Full ❑ Finished ® Partial ❑ Partial ❑ Storage ❑ None ❑ None ❑ Crawl Space 5 Type of Occupancy (Check all that apply) ❑ New ® Existing[] Addition ❑ Renovation of building ❑ Change of Occupancy: From to ❑ Assembly ❑ Detention ❑ Residential Board ❑ Hotel/Motel/Dorm Occupant Load: persons ❑ with locking II ❑ Large ❑ Small ❑ Lodging/Rooming ❑ Educational ❑ with locking III ❑ Prompt ❑ Bed &Breakfast ❑ Business ❑ with locking IV ❑ Slow ❑ 1 &2 Family ❑ Single Tenant ❑ with locking V ❑ Impractical ❑ Industrial ❑ Multiple Tenant ® Apartment ❑ Storage ❑ Mercantile No. of Units: 4 ❑ Health Care ❑ High Rise ❑ Class A ❑ Day Care ❑ Hospital ❑ Underground ❑ Class B ❑Adult ❑ Nursing Home ❑Windowless ❑ Class C ❑Family ❑ Ambulatory ❑ Other: ❑ Covered Mall ❑Group ❑ Limited ❑Other: Type of Construction per NFPA 220: (Check all that apply) ❑Type I ❑Type II ❑Type III ❑Type IV ®Type V ❑ 1 (443) ❑ II (222) ❑ III (211) ❑ (2HH) ❑V(111) ❑ 1 (332) ❑ II (111) ❑ III (200) ®V(000) ❑ II (000) Approved Systems Provided (Check all that apply): ❑Automatic Sprinklers ❑ Fire Alarm ❑ NFPA 13 ❑Throughout the Building ❑ Manual Activation ❑ Occupant Notification ❑ NFPA 13R ❑ Partial: Location ❑Automatic Activation ❑ General ❑Zoned ❑ NFPA 13D ❑ Electrically Supervised ❑ Throughout the Building ❑Voice Evacuation ❑CSFSC 7-7.1.2 Isolated Hazardous Area System ❑ Partial Location: Location: ❑ Water Flow ❑ Special System: ❑ Emergency Lighting❑ NFPA 96 Hood System ❑ Other Activation Means: ❑ Smoke Control ❑Standpipe; Class: ® Other Systems: DC Single-Station smoke alarms Other Information Building has 3 existing AC/DC smoke alarms in the basement. Side 3 of 3 I intend to provide the following safeguard(s)as an alternative measure to secure public safety in lieu of strict compliance with the �'• requirement of the CSFSC,Part IV,Chapter 24 Section 2.2.3 noted above: UnSart Name Or agu a on r w i w o a e is sung eques vd-antity section o sgu a on Apartment 1 -In Apartment 1 I intend to install DC smoke alarms that are interconnected wirelessly*(see product info attached on separate sheet). I will install two(2)of these smoke alarms in the living area and one (1)inside the bedroom in question(see Apartment 1'sketch attached). Apartment 2-In Apartment 2 I intend to install DC smoke alarms that are interconnected wirelessly*(see product info attached on separate sheet). I will install two(2)of these smoke alarms in the living area and one (1)inside the bedroom in question(see Apartment 2 sketch attached). * The technology in these smoke alarms allows them to communicate wirelessly like interconnected AC smoke alarms. When one smoke alarm activates,all of the smoke alarms in the apartment will alarm. ® Separate Sheet Attached In addition the following are enclosed ®Plans/Drawings/Sketches; ®Photographs; ®Product Data Sheets ❑Supplement Information Sheet ❑Other as necessary for clarification of the information provided. tn��., �,�,-J quo—(s+ Applicant's Signature Telephone Number Date FOR LocAL FIRE MARSHAL USE _ I, ®Support, ❑Do NOT Support, this Request for Modification to Connecticut CSFSC,Part IV,Chapter 24.2.2.3 , Identify Code by Name;La.Fire Safety Code,Oq auming Equip Code Regulation of Connecticut State Agency inclusive;as identified above to Section Insert regulation Number La 29.292-0d,z&317Js,ate. because of the following reasons: Identify code flow Le.occupancy diapter,core chapter as applicable I feel that the building owner's proposed modifications meet the intent of the CSFSC and will provide the occupants with early notification in the event of a fire. ❑ Separate Sheet Attached "/ 860-282-066 Walter Summers GG. �s �rw�'!`�� 9 EXT 4 Fire Hershel Ravi s Signature/Title Telephone Number Date ❑ Contact me regarding this Request STATE FIRE MARSHAL The response of the Commissioner of Public Safety/State Fire Marshal to this request in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes§29- is attached on a separate sheet tairial, Side z or a I I i I !i 1 t. 1 I DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# Application is hereby: b BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# 644-2511 ext. 230 Date Building[nsp r Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: F7Tenant $0-$1,000=$15.00 Street Lot No. Over$1,000= $15.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof gnation Apt.No. APPLICANT APPLICANT ADDRESS l'Y �' Tu e� �r�lC_ AU L41ir 6ip-.s4'r. CI— 6" APPLICANT PHONE# OW N Se- OWNER Ark _� � _ - OWNER ADDRESS SA F, OWNER PHONE— ,S2 d'— 4I 9q C ESTIMATED COST$ �U(� IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? _ No FEE ENCLOSED$ SO .Co TYPE OF JOB: R _New Installation �Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 4/01//2002 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A d RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? B YES 0 NO 0 BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY ❑ASSEMBLY ❑MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑INSTITUTIONAL ❑FACTORY ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE 0 STORAGE ❑GARAGE ADDRESS ❑MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP (Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD SIZE OF SERVICE SIZE OF MAIN CONDUCTORS NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? ❑YES O NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. 1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. / CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT —�" IJ --'"T � u u ➢ 1 I r o o l r_ 4. •.,V;, - Electric # APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# Date: HVAC # 116 Z�J=�L J 0 Sprinkler Estimated Cost $ z FINAL APPROVALS L Permit Fee $_(� Building F00000- SIGN PLETE RED BOXED AREAS Occupancy Fee $ ID Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Eng. Insp. Fee $ Affidavitppr. for CO. ON REVERSE SIDE -- ---- - - -- - - ------- Total Fee $ 100 _ TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT (Additional Cost) $ The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the follo 'ng: Applicant L/.4,n — 12;d-c Z,,yf Co. Location of Work vi Lot No. Applicant's Address/4'2 f/g.., 11&, ST A�� G/r, Tel.# 9S1 "4r3-67 Town b�w4C*•j a,. Zip d l06 Lic. Owner c*N Sae_ 1�G C Architect Owner's Address i ck" ST Architect's Address Zip Zip- -Sq. Ft. New Area: 1 st FI. 2nd FI. 3rd FI. Total New Area Purpose of this p rmit 1?,014,w City Water❑ Well❑ Septic System❑ Sewer❑ Ins: HO S Area Basement Garage Approved by Date �' e Use Group Construction Type Revised W02 o 351- I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in which this building and its use is allowed. Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit. Signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Application and supplements must be tiled in triplicate. 2. Application must be typewritten or printed in ink. 3. Answer all items, with particular attention to Page 3. 4. Application must be delivered to Chairman or Secretary no later than 15 days prior to first Thursday of each month. Submit application as soon as possible because it will be returned if incomplete or not described satisfactorily. 5. The applicant or his representative must be present for the Board Meeting(time and place to be advised). TO BE COMPLETED BY BOARD Town of South Windsor Applicant Filed 1540 Sullivan Ave. , South Windsor, CT //' / ' Mailing Address . . Fee Receipt No. 9( 7.q. , Is applicant a corporation, co-partnership or individual? Corporation If corporation list names of officers, if co-partnership—owners: T... V. .Sprenkel,. Town,Manager Address•1549, Sullivan Ave. , So. Windsor,CT Town Council :1540 Sullivan Ave. , So.Windsor,CT Address. . . . . . . . . . . Address: . Is applicant owner, lessee or prospective tenant? .Pro ppAgtive owner. . Check one of the following: REQUEST VARIATION OF ZONING ORDINANCE: To vary Article ?r!?. Section to allow A. ,variance for the ,building. setback. res ulting from relocation of the street line. . ❑OR SPECIFIC EXCEPTION OR ❑ APPROVAL UNDER Section. . . . to allow ❑OR AN APPEAL FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTOR'S DECISION INVOLVING . . ❑ OR STATE HEARING UNDER 14-321❑ OR 14-54❑ OF THE GENERAL STATUTES FOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L7 OR TEMPORARY AND CONDITIONAL PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . on premises known as114. & 116. Buckland Rd. , South k'indsor, CT Zone AA-30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (STREET AND NUMeERI Owner of property William F. Perrotta . , . . Address 186 Brook St,So.Windsor,CT —1— Ii State,the particular hardship or unnecessary difficulty that prompts this application: Application, is made by, the Town pursuant ,to Section . 4Q-.?4, Pr. the, General Statutes. ,Relocation} .(?f tbe, street llne, by. .tllq .Town. W.i. l . rendgr building ,49479PTIfoxgr;i491 (Continue on Page 4) Signature of applicant .�. .�. ,. -4 . . . . . . . or This application was executed by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (Attomey or Authorized Agent) in behalf of 4 CApplicant) Liquor Outlets Within the Restricted Area Locations and Distances from Location in Question: Liquor outlets listed Date Distances listed by . . . . . . . . . Date —2— Indicate plot by diagram, photographs and/or letters, in space below, showing streets, lot lines, building line, zone boundary lines, dimensions and buildings present and proposed. It is important to include adjacent properties with dis- tances from subject property. In case of structural changes or new structure blue print or drawing made to scale must be submitted with this application. ACTION OF THE BOARD at the meeting held on GRANTED DENIED . . . . . Restrictions: -3 200*t OLD LOT AREA - 92.9001 S.F. NEW LOT AREA m 41.000 it S.F. ' 19/94 i Q d � Y J Q 2 D: 44 1" in �a +1 a tJ 0 1 v O Q Q J 1 � 1 W \ O Z Z J O W W K Q f U. \ HOUSE Z •11s 11+ fuLDINS Ulf OLD GUILflff uK • o o � 0 I rce VMUT LINK 200' 'L IRON OLo fTI1fR LM[ Iffff of TNMV[Ltf W-A—Vil BUCKLAND ROAD I hereby certify this map to be a substantially correct Class "D" Mao which has been compiled PLOT PLAN from maps suoplied by the Town of South Windsor and EEuckland Road construction plans prepared SHOWING LAND OF by Petersen & Hoffman, April 1973. This lot is nonconforming'to current AA-30 zoning WI LLIAM F. PE R ROTTA regulations for buildirQ setback requirements. CA i °t •'a 10s3 GRISWOLD & PUSS. INo. �'^.:..•.v'• ; CONDULTINO ENOINEErts AND OIL)RVEVON• �y t J MANCH•/TER.CONNECTICUT e-? , 70 SCALE, 1"-40' PROJ. NO. T4-71-DI5 DATE; MARCH 15,19T4 MAY 17 Zoning Board of Appeals South Windsor Town Hall May 8. 1974 8:00 P. M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Messrs. Archer, Devney (sitting in for Clinton) , Warren, Mrs. Murray and Chairman Eriksson Chairman Eriksson waived reading of the Legal Notice since it was quite lengthy, and instructed the Secretary to attach.a copy of it to the Minutes. He announced that all of the applications, Nos. 983-74 to 1005-740 concerned the widening of Buckland Road and were in the same area. Mr. Eriksson asked if anyone in the audience intended -to speak about any of the applications and the following persons res onded: . Mr. Richard Davis, 544 Buckland Road (App. No. 985-74 ; ,Mrs. Pauline K. Fox, 490 Buckland Road (Appp. No. 989-74) = Mr. Alex Sele, 350 Buckland Road (App. No. 991—Ms Mr. & Mrs. Suita, 206 Buckland Road (App. No. 997-74) ; Mr. William F. Perrotta. 114 & 116 Buckland Road (App. No. 998-74) and Mrs. Patricia LaFleur, 326 Buckland Road (App. No. 993-74) . Other than the above, no one was present to speak in favor or opposition to the other applications. Attorney Thomas G. Dennis of 656 Ellington Road, South Windsor, appeared on behalf of the Town of South Windsor and said that the Town is going to widen Buckland Road, but as yet no street line has been established. He stated they wished to establish a width of 50 feet from Oakland Road to the intersection of Deming, and from there to the Town line a width of 40 feet. The paved portion won't be those widths, but that is what the right of way will be. He stated that parcels must be acquired from each of the abutting properties and in some cases it will result in lots being less than the required area in the zoning regulations, and some structures will be located less than the minimum distance from the street line. He further stated that many of ,the properties are already non-conforming primarily because they were built long before building lines were established. Attorney Dennis went on to ,say that since the Town was making them more non-conforming. the Town felt it should apply for variances for these properties and is proceeding under Section 48-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Mr. Dennis presented copies of the statute in question to the Board members. The Statute gives the condemning authority the right to apply for variances on behalf of property owners when they are taking part of the land. By taking part of the land the condemning authority will l render it non-conforming. If a variance is not applied for, the property owner can require the Town to buy the whole parcel of land and the town does not need the entire parcel, just the strip to widen the road. L484 Attorney Dennis stated that this is a classic case of hardship as outlined in the Statutes. The property owners are the victims of governmental activity and through no fault of their own are being rendered in violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Attorney Dennis then asked the audience if anyone had any questions and Mr. William Perrotta of 114 and 116 Buckland Road, asked about compensation for the land. Chairman Eriksson stated that it is not this Board's function to discuss compensation for the land, or whether or not it can be taken, but merely to grant or deny a variance since it will be non-conforming. A lengthy discussion ensued among Messrs. Dennis, Perrotta and Chairman Eriksson about whether or not compensation should be dis- cussed at this meeting. Mrs. Pauline Fox of 490 Buckland Road, Mr. Alex Sele of 350 Buckland Road, and Mrs. Patricia LaFleur of 326 Buckland Road joined in the discussion. Another lengthy discussion ensued as to whether or not a munici- pality can take land, and Mr. Dennis explained the law to the parties, and Mr. Eriksson explained the function of the Zoning Board. Mr. Warren asked Mr. Dennis.if he understood correctly, that if the variances were not granted the Town could acquire the entire• parcel of land. Mr. Dennis stated yes, and further stated that this hearing had no effect whatsoever on whether or not the road is widened, and that the road was going to be widened. After another discussion, Mrs. LaFleur, of 326 Buckland Road decided to take back her objection to the granting of the variance on her property (App. No. 993-74)• Chairman Eriksson stated for the record that the properties in question are in three zones, which have the following requirements : AA-30 30,000 sq. ft. 50 foot setback RC 30,000 sq. ft. 65 foot setback RR 40,000 sq. ft. 50 foot setback It was noted for the record that the dimensions and figures shown in the surveys or maps attached to the applications are correct and shall be made part of the record. The Board then proceeded to discuss each application and to examine each survey individually: No. 983-74 - 5 Oakland Road, RC Zone. Attorney Dennis stated the Town is asking for a variance for building setback and lot area, and the building is already non-conforming. No. 984-74 - 550 Buckland Road, RC Zone. Town is asking for vari- ance for building setback and lot area. It is already non-conforming. 1485 No. 985-74 - 544 Buckland Road, RC Zone. Mr. Richard Davis, owner of the property in questions stated for the record that he is in favor of this variance being granted. The Town is asking for a variance of the building setback and lot area. Mr. Dennis mentioned the survey incorrectly shows the house number as 542, It should be shown as 544. No. 986-74 - 530 Buckland Road, RC Zone. Mr. Dennis noted that the application in this matter asks for variance of building setback and lot area, however, the survey shows that a lot area variance is not necessary. No. 987-74 - 513 Buckland Road, RC Zone. Variance for setback asked for. No. 988-74 - 498 Buckland Road, RC Zone. The application in this matter asks for variance of building setback and lot area, however, the survey shows the lot area variance is not necessary. No. 989-74 - 490 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Variance for lot area is requested. No. 990-74 - 400 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Just a building setback variance is required. The Town will have to buy, one barn which will V be torn down. No. 291-74 -- 350 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Just a variance for building setback is requested. No. 992-74 - 335 Buckland Road, RR Zone. A variance for building setback and lot area is requested. No. 993-74 - 326 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. This application asked for variance of building setback and lot area, however, the survey shows only building setback is necessary. Mrs. LaFleur, owner of the property, asked Attorney Dennis what the most they could lose was, and he informed her about 7-1/2 feet at most, and that the blacktop cannot come in more than 7-1/2 feet. No. 994-74 - 325 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Both building setback and lot area variances required. No. 995-74 - 252 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. This application asked for variance of building setback and lot area, however, only building setback is required. Attorney Dennis stated that this property was conforming before. No. 996-74 - 240 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. A variance for building setback is required. There was a--brief discussion regarding traffic control on Buckland Road, and Attorney Dennis stated he didn't know if the Town intended to put up any stop signs, but that the Town Council had recently instructed the Town Manager to see that the speed limits are strictly enforced in the future. Once the road is straightened and repaved and the bumps removed, it is possible there could be a traffic problem. No. 997-74 - 206 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Variance for setback is requested. No. 998-74 - 114 and 116 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Building setback variance required. Mr. Eriksson noted that he knows there is a garage on this property which does not show on the survey. No. 999-74 - 103 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Both building setback and lot area variances are required. No. 1000-74 - 95 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Building setback and lot area variance is required. No. 1001-74_- 79 Vuckland Road, RR Zone. Building setback and lot area variance required. No. 1002-74 - 70 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Lot area variance requested. No. 1003-74 - 70 Buckland Road, AA-30 Zone. Just building setback required. No. 1004-74 - 15 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Building setback and lot area variance required. Property was conforming as to setback before taking. t" No. 1005-74 - 9 Buckland Road, RR Zone. Building setback and lot area variance required. Igrs; Murray moved the Board go into Executive Session. Mr. Devney seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was a discussion regarding the fact that the Board felt the variances should be granted, however, they were concerned because the surveys do not show the actual amount of the setback from the new street line to actual buildings on the properties. Mir. Warren moved that the Board request the Town Clerk to duly record the actual setback from the new street line to actual buildings on the properties affected in the setback requirements by the expansion of the Buckland Road new street line and that the Town Attorney be notified of this requirement. Mr. Archer seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed. Mr. Archer then moved that variances be granted on the applications as follows, and in conformance with the maps submitted with the applications: I AS7 No. 983-74 setback and lot area; No. 984-74 setback and lot area; No. 985-74 setback and lot area; No. 986-74 setback; No. 987-74 setback; No.. 988-74 setback; No. 989-74 lot area; No. 990-74 setback; No. 991-74 setback; No. 992-74 setback and lot area; No. 993-74 setback; No. 994-74 setback and lot area; No. 995-74 setback; No. 996-74 setback; No. 997-74 setback; No. 998-74 setback; No. 999-74 setback and lot area; No. 1000-74 setback and lot area; No. 1001-74 setback and lot areal -No. 1002-74 lot area; No. 1003-74 setback; No. 1004-74 setback and lot area and No. 1005 setback and lot area. The Board felt in granting these variances that this is a classic case of hardship as ...outlined in the General Statutes, and that the property owners are victims of governmental activity and through no fault of their own their properties are being rendered in violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Warren seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed. Effective Datet May 21, 1974. ReApectfully submitted; Richard H. triksson, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals