The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About22 Wheeler Road (3)JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS' P.C• TRAPPIC • TRAN8PORTATION RNOINRERt 862 COMMERCE STREET • THORNWOOD, N. Y.• 10504•(014)7694= TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY THE PLAZA AT BUCKLAND HILLS MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT JOB NO. 269 REVISED MAY 11 1989 Page 1 SECTION I INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Figure No. 1) A mixed-use development to be known as The Plaza at Buckland Hills is proposed to be constructed on a parcel of land located in the Towns of South Windsor and Manchester, Connecticut. As shown on Figure No. 1, the site is situated in the northwest corner of the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Buckland Street west of the proposed Buckland Hills Mall. The site has approximately 3,800 feet of frontage along Pleasant Valley Road, 500 feet of frontage along Buckland Street, 1,300 feet of frontage along Wheeler Road and 1,300 feet of frontage along Smith Street.Access to the development would be provided by driveway connections to Pleasant Valley Road, Buckland Street and Smith Street.The site, when completed, would consist of approximately 500,000 s.f. of retail space and 400,000 s.f. of office space. B. SCOPE OF STUDY This study has been prepared to analyze the traffic impact of The Plaza at Buckland Hills and to make recommendations for Page 2 roadway improvements which may be required to mitigate the traffic impact of the project. In the course of this study, traffic volumes on the roadways surrounding the site were established and projected into the future, taking into account regional traffic growth and the traffic generated by other developments in the vicinity of the site. In addition, estimates of the new traffic that would be generated by the site were made and added to the projected external traffic volumes to form the combined traffic volumes. These volumes were then analyzed to determine future operating conditions and any roadway improvements that may be required. Throughout this study traffic volumes are discussed in the following terms: 1. Projected External Traffic Volumes The existing traffic volumes on the roadways in the vicinity of the site projected into the future taking into account normal regional traffic growth and the traffic generated by other proposed developments in the area. 2. Site Generated Traffic The anticipated traffic volumes entering and exiting the proposed development. Page 3 3. Diverted Traffic An intermediate stop made by a portion of the Projected External Traffic Volumes which is seen as a compon nt of the Site Generated Traffic Volumes. Such vehicles would exist on the external roadway network even if the development were not built. 4. New Traffic The Site Generated Traffic Volumes minus the div rt d traffic volumes represent the New Traffic that would b added to the adjoining roadway network. 5. Combined Traffic Volumes The total of, the External Traffic Volumes and the New Traffic generated by the proposed development. C. EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK As shown on Figure No. 1, the site is generally bounded by Smith Street to the north, Pleasant Valley Road to the south, Wh eler Street to the west and Buckland Street to the east. As mentioned previously, direct access to the site would be provided by driveways located on Buckland Street, Pleasant Valley Road and Smith Street. Regional access to the site will be provided via Interstate Route 84 and its ramps to Pleasant Valley Road and Buckland Street.The following is a brief description of these and oth r roadways in the vicinity of the site: Page 4 1. Interstate Route 84 is a limited access, major, east/west, facility.The ' roadway extends from th Connecticut/New York State line near Danbury,. Connecticut, across the State, to the Connecticut/Massachusetts State line near Mashapaug. In the vicinity of the site, the roadway is presently under reconstruction and work is expected to be completed by the year 1990. When finished, the roadway will provide three travel lanes in each direction and an additional High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction.Access to the HOV lanes would be provided to and from the west at Buckland Street. Ramps to and from eastbound I-84 are also provided to Buckland Street while westbound I-84 on and off ramps are provided to Pleasant Valley Road. 2. Buckland Street is a local north/south roadway that originates to the north in South Windsor at the Wapping Five Corners intersection (CT. Routes 30, 194 and 74) and extends south into Manchester to its intersection with Tolland Turnpike.As part of the C.D.O.T. I-84 reconstruction project, Buckland Street has been widened between Smith Street and Tolland Turnpike. The widening in this area generally provides two through lanes in each direction and separate turning lanes at key intersections. Signalization is provided at major intersections. A commuter parking lot has been Page 5 contructed in conjunction with the I-84 reconstruction project 'in the south/west corner of the intersection of Buckland Street and Pleasant Valley Road. Additional improvements are planned for this intersection in conjunction with the proposed Buckland Hills Mall being developed by Homart Development Company.A new roadway designated "North Access Road" would be constructed opposite Pleasant Valley Road and extend between Buckland Road and Slater Street. This proposed access road would provide two inbound lanes and four outbound lanes at Buckland Street in the form of a double left turn lane, one through lane and a through/right turn lane.The northbound approach of Buckland Street would be provided a double left turn lane, two through lanes and a separate right turn lane.The southbound approach of Buckland Street at this intersection would be provided a separate 1 ft turn lane, an exclusive through lane and a through/right turn lane. The Pleasant Valley approach to the intersection would be widened to provide thr e lanes, a left turn lane, a through lane and a separat right turn lane. 3. Pleasant Valley Road in the vicinity of the site, provides two through lanes in each direction between Buckland Street and the eastern J.C. P nney driv way. Page 6 West of this driveway, the roadway tapers to an existing two lane section. 4. Tolland Turnpike is an east/west local roadway that extends from North Main Street to Connecticut Rout 30. Reclently, Tolland Turnpike was widened east of th J.C. Penney driveway in conjunction with the I-84 reconstruction project.Additional widening between Chapel Road' and the J.C. Penney entrance will tak place along Tolland Turnpike in conjunction with the Interstate 291 construction project. D. PEAK HOURS Based upon a review of the projected traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site and typical traffic generating characteristics of the proposed development, the following peak hours were determined to be critical with respect to the traffic analysis: The Peak AM Highway Hour (Weekday Morning Rush Hour) The Peak PM Highway Hour (Weekday Afternoon Rush Hour) The Peak Saturday Hour (Shopper Hour) E. EXISTING AND PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Information was coll ct d regarding xisting traffic volumes at key intersections in th vicinity of the site. The counts Page 7 contained in the Traffic Impact Report prepared for the Homart Development at Buckland Hills prepared by Fuss and O'Neill, Inc. dated July 16, 1987 (and subsequent Peak PM Hour counts) were utilized in this report. These counts as well as traffic count data obtained from the Connecticut Department of Transportation and traffic count information contained in other studies prepared for the area formed the basis of the Projected External Traffic Volumes in the vicinity of the site. These volumes take into account an approximately 3% increase in traffic due to normal regional traffic growth as well as the traffic generated by several other developments in the vicinity of the site. These developments include: o Homart Development at Buckland Hills which entails: 1,161,000 s.f. retail Three restaurants (625 seats) 200 room hotel 80,000 s.f. office o Lakewood Condominiums o Brentwood Condominiums o J.C. Penney Retail Outlet Conversion o Heartland Shopping Center o Economy Electric Distribution Center o Red Roof Inn 0 Town Shopping Center Page 8 For ease of review, the Combined Traffic Volumes prepared by Fuss and O'Neill in their July 16, 1987 report (with adjustments to take into account their subsequent peak PM hour counts and the traffic generated by the Town Shopping Center) were us d to r present the Projected External Traffic Volumes in this r port and where provided have been reprinted on Figure Nos. 2, 3 and 4 which are located in Appendix "A" of this study. It should be noted, that additional adjustments were made to the traffic xiting the I-84 eastbound off ramp to reflect 18% of the exiting traffic using the H.O.V. ramp (as per Connecticut Department of Transportation planning projections) . Based upon discussions with the Connecticut Department of Transportation Planning Division, traffic will grow at an annual rate of 3% per year due to normal traffic growth. This traffic would be in addition to the traffic generated by other developments. Shown on Figure Nos. 5, 6 and 7 is the additional traffic due to normal traffic growth between 1990 and the d sign y ar of the project - 1992. The addition of the 1990 Projected External Traffic Volumes and the normal traffic growth resulted in the 1992 Project d External Traffic Volumes shown on Figure Nos. S. 9 and 10. Page 9 SECTION II SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC A. TRIP GENERATION RATES The site generated traffic volumes or the estimated number of vehicular trips entering and exiting a development during the peak hours are normally expressed in terms of vehicle trips per 11000 s.f. of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) for retail development or Gross Floor Area for office development. In this study the hourly trip generation rates utilized reflect new rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engine rs ITE) as contained in their informational report entitled "Trip Generation", 4th Edition, September, 1987. It is generally recognized that not all trips to a new shopping c nter are new trips added to the roadway system. This concept, generally termed "diverted traffic" takes into account that portion of vehicular trips that would have been seen on the roadway network even if the development were not built. These are trips that are diverted to the retail development which would have passed by the site if it were not there. This study conservatively assumes a 20% shopper credit during the Peak PM Highway Hour, a 13% credit during the Peak Saturday Hour and 0% credit during the Peak AM Highway Hour. In Page 10 addition, it was assumed that 10$ of the office traffic would be destined to the shopping center during the Peak PM Highway Hour mixed use credit) . The trip generation rates for the office space are based upon the rates published by ITE for office development. The trip v g neration rates utilized and the anticipated amount of n w traffic generated by each development type are shown on Table No. 1 in Appendix "B" of this report. B. ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION The origins of shopper patrons were based upon a market study prepared for the retail development, while the origins of office traffic were based upon the arrival/departure distribution patterns prepared for the Homart Development as contained in the Fuss and O'Neill Study. Utilizing these origins the arrival/departure distribution of site traffic was assigned to the various roadway segments in the area, Figure Nos. 11 and 12 in Appendix "A" show the retail assignment.The r tail assignment reflects a 10% interplay with the Homart development via the North Access Road.Figure Nos. 13 and 14 show the ffice assignment. Since the retail assignment reflects that 10% of the traffic entering and exiting the Plaza's retail development will b exiting from and ntering to th Homart d v lopment, a portion Page 11 of Homart generated traffic had to be diverted. Th se diversions are depicted on Figure Nos. 15, 16 and 17 in Appendix A" of this report. C. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC The amount of site generated traffic added to the roadway n twork and the traffic diverted due to the pass-by credit application is depicted on Figure Nos. 18, 19, and 20 for th retail development and Figure Nos. 21, 22 and 23 for the office development. The application of the Peak PM Highway Hour and the Peak Saturday Hour "Passby Trip Credits" are illustrated on Figure Nos. 24 and 25, respectively. It should be noted that the traffic diverted from pass-by volumes does not exceed 10% of the 1992 Projected External Traffic Volumes excluding the Homart d velopment traffic (Connecticut Department of Transportation planning guidelines) . D. COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES The "new traffic" generated by the Plaza at Buckland Hills was added to the 1992 Projected External Traffic Volumes on each roadway segment resulting in the 1992 Combined Traffic Volumes. Th se volumes, which were utilized in the capacity analysis, are shown on Figure Nos. 26, 27 and 28 in App ndix "A" of this report. Page 12 SECTION III TRAFFIC ANALYSIS A. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS In order to determine future operating conditions and what improvements if any would be needed to serve future traffic volumes it was necessary to perform capacity analysis. The following is a brief description of the analysis method utilized in this report. 1. Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis The capacity analysis for signalized intersections were performed in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual published by th Transportation Research Board. The terminology used in identifying traffic flow conditions is Levels of Service, with a Level of Service "A" representing the best condition and a Level of Service "F" representing the worst condition.A Level of Service "C" is generally used as the design standard while a Lev 1 of Service "D" is acceptable during peak periods. A Level of Service "E" represents an operation at or n ar capacity.In order to identify an intersections Level of Service the average amount of vehicular delay is computed for each approach of an intersection. Page 13 2. Unsignalized Capacity Analysis The unsignalized intersection capacity analysis method utilized in this report is also performed in accordanc with procedures described in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The procedure is based upon the utilization of gaps in the major traffic stream and it computes a Level of Service based upon the reserve capacity of each key movement at an intersection. on roadways such as those in the vicinity of the site, it can normally be expected that the uncontrolled major traffic str am will exhibit favorable operating conditions, while side street traffic may experience some delays, during p ak periods, when turning left or crossing the major traffic stream. Additional information concerning Levels of Service at signalized and unsignalized intersections can be found in Appendix "D" of this report. Capacity analysis was conducted for several key locations in the vicinity of the site. These locations are listed below: 1. Route 30 & Pleasant Valley Road 2. Pleasant Valley Rd. & I-84 WB Ramps/Drwy No. 2 3. Pleasant Vall y Rd. & Driv way No. 3 Page 14 4. Wapping Five Corners 5. Buckland Street and Pleasant Valley Road 6. Buckland Street and S. Access Road 7. Buckland Street and I-84 HOV ramps S. Buckland Street and I-84 EB ramps 9. Buckland Street and Tolland Turnpike 10. Pleasant Valley Road and Long Hill Road 11. Pleasant Valley Road and Clark Street 12. Buckland Street and Deming Street 13. Buckland Street and Driveway No. 1 14. Pleasant Valley Road and J. C. Penney's (East) 15. Pleasant Valley Road and Croft Drive/Driveway No. 5 16. Pleasant Valley Road and Wheeler Road 17. Pleasant Valley Road and Driveway No. 4 18. Wheeler Road and Smith Street 19. Smith Street and Driveway No. 6 20. Smith Street and Buckland Street Since several improvements are expected to be in place prior to the completion of the development, they have been included in the analysis presented in this report. These improvements which are outlined in the Homart Study include: 1. Completion of the I-84 interchange at Buckland Stre t. 2. The Hale Road extension from Deming Street to Slater Street in the vicinity of the proposed "North Acc ss Road" of the Homart dev lopm nt. Page 15 3. The improvements outlined in STC Certificate No. 603 for the Buckland Hills project and improvements outlined in the study prepared for the Town of Manchester by Purcell Associates. These are listed in Appendix "E" of this report. (Reprinted from the Buckland Hills Mall Traffic Study) 4. The intersection improvements being undertaken in conjunction with the Buckland Hills mall expansion. 5. The additional improvements recommended in this study in conjunction with the development of The Plaza at Buckland Hills. B. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were conducted for key intersections utilizing the Projected External Traffic Volumes. Analysis was conducted assuming the improvements listed in Nos. 1 through 4 above w r implemented. Results of the capacity analysis conduct d utilizing the 1992 Projected External Traffic Volumes are shown on Table No. 2 in Appendix "B" of this report. A review of the levels of service obtained at each of th, k y intersections indicates that acceptable operating conditions would be provided at each location except the Wapping Five Corners intersection. This int rs ction can b expect d to Page 16 operate at or near capacity during the peak hours due to continued traffic growth in the area.As indicated in th Buckland Hills Mall Traffic Study, right-of-way restraints and the location of historically significant properties make capacity improvements to the intersection difficult. Studies are currently being undertaken by the Town in order to improv th traffic operation of the intersection. Capacity analyses were conducted at each of the key locations utilizing the Combined Traffic Volumes for each of the p ak hours.The analyses were conducted assuming the implementation of the improvements mentioned previously and the roadway improvements and access design listed below and shown on Figure No. 29 in Appendix "A". 1. Construct Driveway No. 1 on Buckland Street near the northern site property line to provide a right turn entering and a right turn exiting movement only. The right turn exiting movement should be placed under stop sign control. 2. Construct Driveway No. 2 opposite the I-84 westbound on/off ramps at Pleasant Valley Road to provid two entering lanes and three exiting lanes in the form of a separate left turn lane, a through lane and a separate right turn lane. Page 17 3. Construct Driveway No. 3 on Pleasant Valley Road opposite the westernmost J. C. Penney driveway. The driveway should provide one entering lane and two exiting lanes in the form of a separate left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. 4. Construct Driveway No. 4 on Pleasant Valley Road west of Driveway No. 3 to provide additional right turn ingress and egress to the office development. 5. Construct Driveway No. 5 on Pleasant Valley Road opposite Croft Drive to provide one wide entering lane and two exiting lanes in the form of a separate 1 ft turn lane and a separate right turn lane. 6. Construct Driveway No. 6 on Smith Street to provide one wide entering lane and one wide exiting lane. Install a "stop" sign on its approach to Smith Street. 7. Construct a separate right turn lane on the southbound approach of Buckland Street at Pleasant Valley Road/North Access Road. S. At Pleasant Valley Road intersection with the I-84 westbound on/off ramps. Pleasant Valley Road eastbound approach should be widened to provide a separate left turn lane and a separate right turn lane. Pleasant Page 18 Valley Road westbound approach to the intersection should be widened to provide a separate right turn lane. 9. Pleasant Valley Road in the vicinity of proposed Driveway No. 3 should undergo roadway improvements to flatten the existing horizontal curve on Pleasant Valley Road in this area. In addition, Pleasant Valley Road in this area should be widened to provide two lanes on both the east and westbound approaches of this intersection with Driveway No. 3. 10. Pleasant Valley Road at its intersection with Croft Drive and proposed Driveway No. 5 should be widened to provide a separate left turn lane on both the eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection. 11. New actuated traffic signals should be installed at the following intersections: o Pleasant Valley Road at proposed Driveway No. 3 and western most J.C. Penney driveway. o Pleasant Valley Road at Croft Drive and proposed Driveway No. 5. Page 19 12. The existing traffic signals at the following locations should be modified in accordance with the proposed geometric revisions to the intersection: o Buckland Street at Pleasant Valley Road/North Access Road. o Pleasant Valley Road at the I-84 westbound on/off ramps/proposed Driveway No. 2. 13. Interconnect the existing and proposed traffic signals on Pleasant Valley Road at Driveway No. 2,3 and 5 and at the Buckland Street intersection. 14. Monitor the intersection of Buckland Street and Smith Street for future signalization. Results of the capacity analysis conducted for each of the key locations, assuming the implementation of the improvements recommended above and the improvements mentioned previously, indicated that acceptable operating conditions would be provid d at all locations analyzed except the Wapping Five Corners intersection. This intersection will operate at or n ar capacity during the peak hours with or without the proposed development. Page 20 The Town is currently studying the situation.A compl t summary of the Levels of Service obtained at each of the key locations is shown on Table No. 2 in Appendix "B" of this report. C. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This report presents an analysis of futre traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site with and without the Plaza at Buckland Hills development. Analysis of the No-Build condition indicates acceptable operating conditions will be experienced on the adjoining roadway network assuming the implementation of the extensive improvements being undertaken by the State, Town and developers in the area. Analysis of the Build condition (with the development) indicated that several additional roadway improvements should be implemented to mitigate the increase in traffic associated with development. These improvements, (which are listed in the previous section) if implemented, will provide acceptable operating conditions on the adjoining roadway network even after completion of the Plaza at Buckland Hills. Res tfully submitted, JO 0 I N ERS P.C. Jo n Collins, P D. ,P.E. Peter J. ackiewicz Project Engineer jd.tislat st T APPENDIX "A" FIGURES SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE Isa ARNATA S.C. t t ELLINGTON RD. o lb t J ft oElwnrs sr. SMIM sr SITE ccEss le. MALE NO. aat OIL HILLS sURNNAM SL summ"!t i si a asT °, J+ 4A.VtIlWV ea AC r o all+xe N a st• VDI I Ago r 6i at Z NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE LOCATION MAP MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE APRIL .1989 FIGURE NO.1 SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE I94 0 s pwtELLN1(iTpp no. h s r 1 b LinN s' N w It r s N r ee w ri3 ss S o aiT'' qy+ rat ss + 17 ST ft NALE RO• IIII SERT»e COWT9L 3»0 w p o;u . InL fa n w.ur" r t 56S sm it 1 20 o S h cT11TE 04 e° r f 7 fn as.Pomw oa J FM IM p f o • SEE INSERTY Now 1-M LIL A tp<,1NO 1tlItMPIKE 517 p gr- N FAIN ST. O u Z157-i Rg Z NOTE:LINE 0101RAN NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1990 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS T+ORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO.Z- M M SULLOWA AVE. ROUTE 194 o a A o ti No rs,, 1 t ELIINGTON RO. sJoet- z ems. 391 < . to it.23 t DOWN orAop y 4• SITE sccEss foe. tu:. aaT.RWOMAWs•r, e1aINSERT•A• j aMNNAM NftL sm 1 L I r Palo"ea Yri i0 M+IM e c 1 SEE INSERT•A• i-Mto M 209- NOTE:LINE OIAORAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1990 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW 1fORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO. 3 M M SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 o ab0 Vv t ELLMpTOMI0..=_Nrs 3 0 01I1 r&ts 1 r ti' T t Ib tt j If t OrE J s>' seIs9 w iyl Come sr Sr o r r 6 SITE f MALE'Ra C110/T oft 3"me 0 soomme INSERT"A" i 14-0 No" lit 1 ppA II E e• k o 0 ea prwa. x o o SEE INERT"A" c NOW am" 1 cft 1-ML66 MKE 2 262'i NOTE:LINE DIA mm NOT TO$CAI E PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER F390 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW 1fORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,889 FIGURE NO.4 SULLI%M ME. RME W4 y 00 ANOM oPrva o o1. 7 17 ELL IINGTON goo 400" 0-0 Ito. Oo to 1 i5 o 01t fir+ a p M10 o • L V L _ dro Swm ST.' 6 O0% /'` b' r°r SITE l ccts °` r p' NALE*Ito. 1NSERT wAr COOIT aft i3 we O O,890RLAW eWWWAM In i 3 Lo jl.r o w N. for 10 OI• I ! O h e nc g PM ILL SEE IIAEIITe r O VhNLL NKE S M`I- N MAIN Si. TOLLANO r T' a NOTE.LINE OIAGINAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER NORMAL TRAFFIC GROWTH MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. 1990 TO 1092 PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO. 5 sut.Llww ME. IIOUTE 194 ep eMne Its, i3 AVIIv e° e /' O Y'O •t E«MI6TON RO, od i Z e A a d,'! N` or 3 I yD w s a MM tM sr.* SITE aEss INSERT"A" 3"Y a ' e SZOUCKAW aNlNIIAM fE ewe n Go* r 11 WL i r'1# sm too k M g FM ee. t SEE INERT"A". 10 O O G w ROM 4-0 1-e4LIL tU1111P11tE r3 N.%41N. M TpLLANO t N I NOTE:LINE 01JUMM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER NORMAL TRAFFIC GROWTH MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. 1990 TO 1992 PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE=APRIL,889 FIGURE NO.G SULLIVAN AM. ROUTE 194 090 A1MO o • ejv N_ t ELLMp;TON O oil. dp 4--z i srSO1-6 v i ems' bw IleSITE w NAU'R0. w e! 1 NlERT wAw 3 w= e VA W Bums" st A "' e u 44 e• nA« t e1 Mot INTAt ou rw w,°. o= b SEE MISERYwAw ev to h lob o 1 01 Az7I1-04 s.a pNP1KE wS i +1 N.Am OT. TogLANO N M1 NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT To SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER NORMAL TRAFFIC GROWTH MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. 1990 TO 1992 PEAK SATURDAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW 1fORK PROJECT N0. 269 QATEI APRIL,889 FIGURE NO.7 3ULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 0 000 O r c. 00 r ELLI N17 Ro. Nl l ..t91 s3j 170 —;ltrf6 64'1 0-14 ro SO tom" r ' 9 00 ar. w SITE f 41 *%. NAU"NO. CAOIT R w 0' 0v3weINSERToeiV0 IRLe .. wnotwmmmSTrST0001fA'If w< < 1 0 o F INm sm G+ 9-0 ll u.ramET a J` F FM A.1l. Q 0 SEE INSERTwAw amps 33 1 gTa pp 1-M tR r RNMKE N.'OI IIf '. O tOLIANO r= 163 —„h NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO"GALE o, PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR9 CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE: JANUARY. 1989 FIGURE NO.8 SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 e% eee f. t ELtINaTON NO. e f fi ro 16 v 9 a-/9e sNrrN Sr SITE I._4>fj OGEE !: f NALE Ra OMIT eR 3•we l t r ela YiINSERT•A ANNMIAM SL ee ST 1 a k u.ISMsr ea rep w.e. e r r O e a SEE INSERT A y b~ ~1•e4 e.e. t0`LANO Ti1RMP1KE yj A, : N AMAlot ST- bb 014 1 tJlr-i^M z NOTE:LINE OI40RAN NOT TO KALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW 1fORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE=APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO.9 4 SULLMN AVE. ROUTE 194 . 000 A1.1 1M 00 A too AssELLINRTpNft. M Z1 ;IV i aft w r' 7M b 47e r/! 04 low ob Ek K ib SMITN ft erso a St 4. SITE N AU W cow.sa 1 NlERT A'eveftme MIRMIAM ![ W a i tot rA" S 41 If,r 1e13 sm j Ist es *It r 1Nrt11ACTatLto N' ewn L -IQ rN w.a 1 s1 SEE INSERT`O o o a jse Z3 N O 1-M to o MKE 93 N 44114 ST. v.. N,hn 77& f ZZAr NOTE:LINE K46RAM NOT TO SCALE i N PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD. NEW YIORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE.-APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO.10 SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 3% AAYATA s.0 tt EIIINOTON no 5% / 1% 1% 2% 'v IOx oE111 p 296 9x ' IOx 1% i SITE ,,,. ccsF 10%'. 12 x 1 NALE R0. 2% CWT eR ` 10xa 40% 50% VJMMAM WE 11111110M ST 14% ; 30% 34% MOP ac.ptowl CO. moo Z5 4% 996 3% 4x- TURM~KE N 1N• TOt., g 1j 8% 3 0% NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 2 PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER ARRIVAL DISTRIBUTION RETAIL MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE: APRiL .1989 FIGURE NO.ll SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 V 3% ARM S.C. ATA 1 t 1% ELLINGTON Ro.2% 1/O t tit z U t 5% ' 10% ST,TE ts At•' 4t 'Z°1rs /' 9% / OEM sr e . 2910 SITE oEss U• i 40% 10% t•G NALE'NO. e h 0% U. CROFT OIL i` 50 1 1 10'Xe. SOCKLAND 32%I I j "s e11R1a" :R J 2 6 28% a q E e 1241i 16x 2218° gysPoemCO. t° o 13x 4%r1RNpIKE d`yAIIL.ST. Toll o 30e/b / 6 xt NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 1 DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER RE TAIL MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW PORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE zAPRIL .1989 FIGURE NO.I SULLMN AVE ROUTE 194 2lydo w S.C.c. 1 k EIIINGTON R0. fx 4.4 89fi oat a. 196 i 66°J6 SITE sss 0• t 2% CmwT OR weaAwom W elIRNNAM sL alew".11T - ggx s_22%.1 1 44% 22%tC g P° 9.140"T a.Sy J 15% 8% t° 1396 JIA IN 1 -p11tE 2% o TOL•N 5% 4 4% NOTE:LINE OIo"m NOT TO SCALE ARRIVAL DISTRIBUTION PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER OFFICE MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS FIGURE NO. 15 THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE=APRIL.,1989 I I SULLIVAN AVE. RQUTE 194 S AIIMATA C tw t / t 1% ELLINGTON R0. 1% I 1% IA Y. o oo5 to 6% hTE dT Y,A SWN 1'Xe 29'o IO' `) 9% SITE cosss NALE'RO. CROIT OIL OLLS eIMiRAM W . a1R11HAM W SURNIUrI MT j ; IIAL J u.rcMar as 41 22°Jb g 0 O 2°yo` tp'' l o r 11 O TURNo1KE 13 ys! N. 1N St,8% b 44% 5% NOTE:LINE OMRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION MAN CHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. OFFICE JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD T NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE: APRIL . 1988 FIGURE NO.14 M SULLIWA ME. ROUTE 194 AVevZo0300301a4.0 y 0 N j t ELLINgTpr0R0. O Op 1 o o 8 ooa a e 0 00 00 sdt rv, 0 o OEM" St o 0 0 SA O wL,J s01rN or 000 ve i Ow 1 4, SITE Nis_ j OEss ° MALE Rao- CIIO/f M 0 3 Z lINMNIAM R w0.w0 ST 000"o-Ole at 94 OTCt, L 1.1r 11 IO0 000 Qo w u.rcl.n oa lw 0 0 SEE INSERT-A' o New 0-0 O~ 1,94L& MKE 007 p II 494IN ST- TOL1-ANO t i0 J tl' Ono NOW:LINE OIA4RAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER TRAFFIC DIVERTED FROM HOMART MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD.NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL.M9 FIGURE NO.IS SULLI%M ME. ROUTE 04 e••• a w. e•o yoe• y • os e e : ! Je o Abe, 1 ELLINGTpI 1 0-0 s 1t'r. Z o fit• i t i O r 40—e J 'so o o to r i'—• a • s< • e 1 0 gym+ ST ti s ad1' v SITE rj ass taisrrsw3' a INS w oo f r 1 Met1w SURINIAMI SL sv n 1 e L i z Pf-- 1 e S *it t gu..cMr as 49 SEE INXIIT00e 1•0+ta gNNKE 0 M.44114 st r t01.I.ANO 0 f o i N 3lJ Oo NOTE:LINE DUORAN NOT TO SCALE e PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER TRAFFIC DIVERTED FROM HOMART MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD. NEW 11ORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE=APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO./G SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 00 Alums 1Ase. 0 100oaoe0e got G• 0 0 i—o t` 0 PSI A A r e 1 0 Comm sr sr v SITE cc`0 mu RO. eowir se. If o e M I"lERT'A Irii 1 °BURNHAM St L s wp 4 R s tr:rr L gar a7 00 I1no o g ya rMaA 00 GEE INSER 00 O RAN" 1006 1-04 Lk 7uRNnKE 7 •a N AMA1N J toL ANO N i NO NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO!CALF a PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER TRAFFIC DIVERTED FROM HOMART MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO 269 DATE=APRIL,1989 FIGURE No.17 1 f LEGEND SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 TRAFFIC 100)-OIVENTEO TRAFFIC O 000 ALe. Np 4A 1. u O o o,o0 1 t ELLIIHiTpq RD. HO 110 =000 0 00 Y o0J o b of0 000 0 49 0 0 14 It. 0 0n or 0 0 Sr O y y a 00 op6 iIf .4» S ITE I._01j ass I& K Coal NI NSERT80 3 Ne eININ1IAM at ry VIP w 14 o O u.rel ea 0 SEE IN ER,V o 0 13 hM L• R11f1KE 6 7 N'P44IN Ow tOLLANO 4 )O 80,E t W z0MCNOTE:LINE OIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR RETAIL) JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW 11ORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL.1989 FIGURE NO,18 suLLrAN AVE. ROUTE 194 . 00-NEW TRAFFIC 001-DIVERTED TRAFFIC Epp AFAn A 1a o A 51%eae 1 oELLIN:TON RD. 00 1 .L0 000 o e o! o o f-0 at p r o o ro T boo o pro 0 6rwoo/+ b o SITE w Ess C E Olt +, MALE RO• awls NL INSERTwAw M WASSe11RN11ANRftowwmyWALL 0 TV RiE!+ WALL 4 u.rcicn as( M v g p= 1*"ILL SEE IIISfRf 60 o sl Olt 01 C, 0. O TURN 7 N.44IN 0-r+ta PIKE TOL4AN0 t o M4 O-NO NOTE:LINE DIAORAN NOT TO!GALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR RETAIL) JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW PORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL.1989 FIGURE NO. SULLWAN AVE. ROUTE 194 00-NEW TRAFFIC 00)-DIVERTED TRAFFIC 0 A 0 o O 4 tf. o e" d0 ° o o00 2 I 1• t ELLINGTON RD. O 00 O 1 O o 0 eIonlIrIy o * o PI o=0 0 04f- 0 J o f o ° dot ch.A 0 r 0 Y o 00000O O rE Et 0 4, SITE l cress Ve 1•VI HALE RO. alas OR j 400 *1 #. 1 NSERT*A"3 r =~ 0 waw e t e1NIN1IAM SL r St v 1 i tNLtO-1 s wtoLoIliycs f• 1 Otro s):z.? °1 Ntf ststE s4IYLLeo' o^M w wNt y o P9"WV a16 g P"a4. O SEE INSERTMAr O N011 JO 0 ° l"`'`'' O OAJf 0/ a1 9S-0 1URN Rf 7 , N''MN St.ra t.w AI N tOLLANO O f 277 1rl z z O NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR RETAIU JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS R v sED: THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO.269 DATE: MAY,1989 FIGURE 140.20 sULLI%M AVE. ROUTE 194 0 06 o 400 0 r 9140 LaILINGTpIno. Op O- O 1 o o s t o o0 oo 7 to t EN. o sr 0 OP SO f SITE otss -fw4» IIALIt Ro. cmw v M. / 3.age 0-0 1 INSERT Aw OULLSN @URN"" ST sr o00 r253AoLamo 1 a 8 too 1 Fr N ae.amw aL 3b 0 hN UK 00 0 t SEE INSERT"Aw o vi K a 0-0 0 1-N LL TURNhKE 4 1 N,44101 ST. to$L0,NO O-10 00 NOTE:LINE OIAORAN NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR OFFICE) JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD. NEW VMK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO.V SULLINMII AVE. ROUTE 1T 0 AI`t 0 0 0 O t ELL Voo ono 1 0-p1noRo. 00 4 b 0 0 0o S 0I t', 0 o 0 `oo a° E 37DEW* ar t 0 t a-0 o fi s9 xoeby4. SITE ti• l ccEss Ra K. cmwr MALE'Ra 101SERT A 3 me 00 wdttAtr lIMIMIIAM S[ a WALL s to LO t O sat[ lo S olt I- IIrtERstmm 94 i ro L crar7 woo QToae.KNM as 02..a SEE INSERT`A' 00 o r 0 07 1-84La MwoP1KE 23 oo Av.AmoM St. t01.L1 NO M1 39 0 t('0 00 NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME4 MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR OFFICE) JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD.NEW 1fORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL.B69 FIGURE NO. Z Z SULLMN 49. ROUTE W4 o KARvmse. io•t o• o r Goo 0 1 at ELLIfNiTpl RD. ev 1 O e ej * o u%•2 1 ra 00 81 b s e e e k O e 4f 1 v ; t c ee 40-a o a it rrN so alp, SITE 1. w e Oil we NALE Ra ee 1••.e INSERT"A" 3 e NHAM IM MALL W i•L• l • e iwr 310 IN ri 00 r IC.K1Mtr OA f ffe.. 0e OSEEINSERT"A" 0 1-04[.a Z A O00 441N St TOLLANp p t too Oil o o z NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 2 PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR OFFICE) JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 2B9 DATE=APRIL,1989 FIGURE NO.23 VOL. DIVERTED BASE VOLUMES: 29 687 46 FUSS a ONEILL HOMART NO-BUILD I 2 283 19 FACTORED 1& 6% FOR BACKGROUND 13 304 20 GROWTH 05 127 8 o 08 183 13 PROPOSED 1286_48 43 SHOPPER CREDIT DRIVEWAY 100 2346 157 209/6 DIVERTED 4Y, 0 — FROM PASS BY VOLUMES 157= 7% OF EXTERNAL TRAFFICQi DURING PM PEAK wO 0 00 !_-.0. +19+20=+39 PLEASANT VALLEY J--283 -19 j-1304 -to RD. 45(es 4 13 448 13 183 v0 w X o. +r a Z VOL. IN=157s I-84 VOL. OUT=ITT RAMP NOTE DRIVEW co VOLUME EXMNG TO RAMP ADJUSTED - BY+20 FOR HIGHER OUTBOUND VOLUME a NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER APPLICATION OF PASS-By TRIP CREDITS MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLONS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE: APRIL, 1989 FIGURE NO. 74 6 VOL_ DIVERTED BASE VOLUMES: mmmmwm. 29 482 4 8 FUSS S ONEILL HOMART NO-BUILD 16 258 26 FACTORED Q 6%. FOR BACKGROUND 14 224 23 GROWTH 07 117 12 06 113 10 93212 15 PROPOSED 1SHOPPERCREDITDRIVEWAY_... ... 1OOo o/ 1658 166 13%. DIVERTED q$ --- FROM PASS BY VOLUMES 166-=10% OF EXTERNAL TRAFFIC ON SATURDAY coolJI p 2b+23=+49 PLEASANT VALLEY U t3 R0. 47 s 15+32 O aim s Z wok w X 4 i; It VOL. IN = 166 I-84 N VOL. OUT-- 166 RAMP 0 a NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER APPLICATION OF PASS-BY TRIP CREDITS MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR. JOHN COLONS ENGINEERS REVISED:THORNWOODt NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE: MAYj 1989 FIGURE NO.25 1t l 1 SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 70 4116 111,111, 14 10 SO Op r a SITE f son INSERT00 3 we BURNHAM St wiww n i O-1'13 1 it tp1' nr +p*ATE FM IM o SEE INERT'r ww N r 14S I-M LIL O Q IaNpKEI/3 b N.k11M 0. Qi T0s LAND i3'Z x NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS EN3INEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE=APRIL,M9 FIGURE NO.26 j 1 sULLIwN ONE. ROUTE 194 r 0% ae. s ELLM OTWO RD JO.lt K OI 1 to K7 06 wJ N 0 Zo lei x aDom" a'f3 t,, a awn, srora 1NaERT00 BURNHAM R i of PLLS fartS!0 ww,t MS hta NfEoral MLL u.rcNn oa J4tillwaie' SEE INSERT*AO wb 1-M[.a RNMKE a 7 fa N.kA1N'. T0L1./NO e 1 z2/r NOTE:LINE DUMIRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:APRIL,1989 FIGURE N0.27 E I r SULLIVAN AVE. ROUTE 194 M AI^ rY. 1 t' ELLINGTON IS3 3s 341 -It rr&04-1 own 0 to 4p r ch.A a 4 , r E Irk27 oErrwG sr s° try L','b 0. sa 9/° wr rNs w Op ti6 f _SITE I+— j os o• HALE no- cow?oft, INSERT+A` LS s INMMAM sT. st M4 sm ffiftL N L.bb 41 6110,1SN No I ATE 04 u.rtusr Ca 00 t SEE INSERT"A" o Nov A/MAIs 1•Nt.a TURMMKE 3f2•7 M M 'MAIN ST TOL%14140 arigP 16, h N/T3 J 1('W 2V' $x NOTE:LINE DMMU NOT TO SCALE s PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER 1992 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. PEAK SATURDAY HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS REWSEPS THORNWOOD, NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 269 DATE:MAY,1989 FIGURE NO.28 1 i SULLIVAN AVE ROUTE 194 CONSTRUCT I)RIVEIMV 140.6 TO SMITH A"»MA STREET TO PROVIDE ONE WIDE ENTERING s C. A LANE AND ONE WIDE EXITING LANE WITH l' ev STOP SIGN CONTROL T MONITOR FOR FUTURE 1RAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY NO.1 TO PROVIDE t ELLINGTON, no. FOR RIGHT TURNS ENTERING AND EXITING TO PROVIDEE ONE ENTERINGNING LANE FLATTEN THE HORIZONTAL AND TWO EXITING LANES AND WIDEN ALIGNMENT OF PLEASANT VAt1EY PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD TO PROVIDE A ROAD N THE VICINITY OF CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY NO.2 TO LDN E ON T A SEPARATE HO A TURN SEPARATE LEFT TURN LANE ON EACH DRIVEWAY NO.3 PROVIDE TWO ENTERING LANES LANE ON AN SOUTET AND APPROACH 1 AND THREE EXITING LANES.OF BUCKLAND STREET AND MODIFY THE APPROACH.INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. E b TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION. CONSTRUCT A SEPARATERIGTi Cd/STRUCT ORNEWAY THE WESTWUNDAPPRO CIII y Ab Na 3 TOPROVIDE ONE ENTERING,LANE AND TWO t h EXITING LANES l M tl•dT,Nr 7iAE. i DEMNG or Sr so SI C,&SS JULCONSTRUCT01IVEWnTNOATO4" I--- MALE R4 PROVIDE FOR ROM TURN!v ENTERING AND EXITING T e~ 3 2 eraNAlle , LLS NRNINHAM ST DOamtlr MIT smt WIDEN PLEASANT VALLEY ROADJyTOPROVIDEANADDITIONALLANE. rs111Kr CO. ON EACH APPROACH rb INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL i AT THE INTERSECTION 0%;. F o tURHPlICE 41II01$1- i TOLLAND I i CONSTRUCT A SEPARATE LEFT y MODIFY THE TRAFFIC 316NAL TURN LANE AND RIGHT TURNLANE fi AT THE INTERSECTION ON THE EASTBOUND APPROACH 3h w 6 NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER CONCEPTUAL HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS MANCHESTER/SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS THORNWOOD,NEW YORK PROJECT N0. 269 DATE:APRIL,B89 FIGURE NO.24 APPENDIX "B" TABLES JOB NO. 269 MAY, 1989 TABLE NO. 1 HOURLY TRIP GENERATION RATES AND ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 500,000 S.F. RETAIL 400,000 S.F. OFFICE ENTERING EXITING ENTERING EXITING PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR I .T.E. RATE 0.64 320 0. 28 140 1.44 576 0. 21 84 SHOPPER CREDIT 0 0 0 0 MIXED USE CREDIT 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 320 140 576 84 PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR I.T.E. RATE 1. 57 785 1. 77 885 0.25 100 1. 30 520 SHOPPER CREDIT (20%) 157 177 0 0 MIXED USE CREDIT 52 0 0 52 10% OF OFFICE EXITING) TOTAL 576 708 100 468 PEAK SATURDAY HOUR I .T.E. RATE 2. 55 1275 2. 45 1225 0.40 160 0. 35 140 SHOPPER CREDIT (13%) 166 166 0 0 MIXED USE CREDIT 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1109 1059 160 140 JOB No. 269 MAY, 1989 TABLE No.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY THE PLAZA AT BUCKLAND HILLS MANCHESTER / SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT AM HIGHWAY HOUR PM HIGHWAY HOUR SATURDAY HOUR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS EXTERNAL BUILD EXTERNAL BUILD EXTERNAL BUILD M-M MY-MAY--M- --M w--- ROUTE 30 A PLEASANT VALLEY 0. D D B C B B PL. VALLEY RD. t I-84 NB RAMPS/DRNY Na.2 C D C C C C PLEASANT VALLEY RD. 6 DRIVEWAY No.3 N/A C N/A C NIA B WAPPIN6 FIVE CORNERS F F F F E E-F BUCKLAND ST. I PLEASANT VALLEY RD. C C D 0 D D BUCKLAND ST. A S. ACCESS RD.B B B B B B BUCKLAND ST. 6 I-94 NOV RAMPS B B 8 B B B BUCKLAND ST. 6 I-84 EB RAMPS C C C C B C BUCKLAND ST. I TOLLAND TPKE C C D D C C PL. VALLEY RD E CROFT DR/DRWY No.9 UNSI6 C UNSI6 C UNSI6 C UNSISNALIZED INTERSECTIONS PL. VALLEY RD I LONG HILL RD. C D C D C C PL. VALLEY RD 6 CLARK ST. D D 0 D C D BUCKLAND ST. 6 DEMING ST. E E E E E E BUCKLAND ST. 6 DRIVEWAY No.1 NIA B NIA C N/A B PLEASANT VALLEY RD. A J.C. PENNEY'S (EAST) E E E E D E PLEASANT VALLEY RD. 6 CROFT DR. C SI6 0 SI6 C SI6 PLEASANT VALLEY RD. A WHEELER RD. D D 0 D B C PLEASANT VALLEY RD. & DRIVEWAY No.4 N/A C N/A A N/A A BUCKLAND STREET 6 SMITH STREET D E E E E E SMITH STREET A WHEELER ROAD A A A A A A SMITH STREET 6 DRIVEWAY No.6 N/A A N/A A N/A A I t APPENDIX "C" CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2 F ROUTE 30 & PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD 3 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 6 15 89 52 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 195 648 392 133 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 20 195 7 17 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N e.9 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N O 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.180 0.544 6.7 B 6.7 B WB LTR 0.990 0.544 30.6 D 30.6 D NB LTR 0.897 0.367 27.5 D 27.5 D SB LTR 0.573 0.367 16.1 C 16.1 C INTERSECTION: Delay 25.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.952 LOS = D y 19B5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY ER WB NB SB : EB WB NB SEA LT 22 2B 75 196 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 701 202 159 324 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 118 95 30 8 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB LTR 0.694 0.367 16.6 C 16.6 C WB LTR 0.718 0.367 18.9 C 18.9 C NB LTR 0.398 0. 544 7.9 B 7.9 B SB LTR 0.728 0.544 12.1 B 12.1 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.724 LOS = B s 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK. SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB s EB WB NH SB LT 19 26 107 63 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 310 242 139 129 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 92 63 32 22 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EH 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 NFL 0.00 4.00 N O 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EH LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.365 0.367 13.5 B 13.5 B WB LTR 0.580 0.367 15.7 C 15.7 C NB LTR 0.381 0.544 7.7 B 7.7 B Ss LTR 0.286 0.544 7.2 B 7.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.461 LOS = B to 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY ER WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 6 15 93 52 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 195 648 400 176 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 32 195 7 17 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.189 0.544 6.7 B 6.7 B WB LTR 0.990 0.544 30.6 D 30.6 D NB LTR 0.952 0.367 34.5 D 34.5 D SB LTR 0.658 0.367 17.7 C 17.7 C INTERSECTION: Delay 26.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.974 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EBB WB NB SEA LT 22 28 94 196 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 701 202 214 348 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 131 95 30 8 : 12.0 12.0 122.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.706 0.367 16.8 C 16.8 C WB LTR 0.725 0.367 19.1 C 19.1 C NB LTR 0.518 0.544 8.9 B 8.9 B SB LTR 0.791 0.544 14.1 B 14.1 P INTERSECTION: Delay 15.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.764 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .ROUTE 30 /PLEASANT VALLEY RD AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE.. . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 19 26 129 63 : LT 12.0 LTR 15.0 LTR 13.0 LTR 13.0 TH 310 242 192 181 : TR 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 116 63 32 22 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 4 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.9 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NBA LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.387 0.367 13.7 B 13.7 B WB LTR 0.584 0.367 15.8 C 15.8 C NB LTR 0.497 0.544 8.7 B 8.7 B SB LTR 0.355 0.544 7.6 B 7.6 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.532 LOS = B 1 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & I-84 WEB RAMPS/DRIVEWAY NO.2 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 586 531 0 : T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 279 478 O 0 TR 14.0 L 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 RT 146 0 308 0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.B 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.6 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 25.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 0.618 0.210 20.2 C 20.2 C WB L 0.731 0.260 28.0 D 19.0 C T 0.523 0.510 8.0 B NB L 0.814 0.410 25.0 D 17.5 C R 0.302 0.670 4.5 A INTERSECTION: Delay = 18.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.742 LOS = C r J 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT O 866 127 0 t T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 732 384 0 0 : TR 14.0 L 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 RT 183 0 114 0 : 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 33.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 0.828 0.330 21.1 C 21.1 C WB L 0.826 0.340 26.7 D 19.3 C T 0.302 0.710 2.5 A NB L 0.380 0.210 26.1 D 17.1 C R 0.136 0.550 7.1 B INTERSECTION: Delay 19.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.720 LOS = C a 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES r GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EH WB NB SB LT 0 1013 113 0 = T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 433 400 0 O r TR 14.0 L 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 RT 152 0 117 0 : 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 r 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 38.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB TR 0.678 0.260 19.0 C 19.0 C WB L 0.842 0.390 24.8 C 18.6 C T 0.323 0.690 2.9 A NB L 0.309 0.230 24.4 C 14.6 B R 0.124 0.620 5.1 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 18.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.661 LOS = C 13 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS/DRWY 2 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST.. . . . . .RR DATE. .. . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 6 568 658 39 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 301 773 58 28 : T 12.0 L 12.0 TR 14.0 T 12.0 RT 197 96 308 3 s T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : R 14.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD PD GREEN 19.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.084 0.220 23.6 C 12.2 B T 0.408 0.220 15.9 C R 0.249 0.520 6.3 B WB L 0.894 0.200 40.0 D 35.4 D T 1.003 0.460 35.5 D R 0.137 0.460 7.3 B NB L 0.927 0.460 34.8 D 26.9 D TR 0.508 0.460 12.7 B SB L 0.582 0.120 39.6 D 33.3 D T 0.139 0.120 25.5 D R 0.018 0.120 25.1 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 28.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.862 LOS = D 1 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS/DRWY 2 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 68 820 141 249 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 806 485 120 195 s T 12.0 L 12.0 TR 14.0 T 12.0 RT 447 212 106 41 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 14.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD PD GREEN 10.0 13.0 28.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.363 0.110 31.9 D 23.6 C T 0.829 0.290 22.9 C R 0.838 0.350 23.6 c WB L 0.890 0.290 33.2 D 22.4 C T 0.616 0.470 11.4 B R 0.262 0.530 6.1 B NB L 0.060 0.300 19.0 C 23.9 C TR 0.678 0.200 26.9 D SB L 0.177 0.300 19.7 C 21.5 C T 0.582 0.200 24.9 C R 0.093 0.310 15.8 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 22.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.816 LOS = C 19- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/I-84 WB RAMPS/DRWY 2 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY E-B WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 69 93B 13B 341 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 457 590 222 250 : T 12.0 L 12.0 TR 14.0 T 12.0 RT 305 382 105 57 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 14.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 18.0 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD PD GREEN 13.0 15.0 18.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.289 0.140 29.5 D 23.7 C T 0.718 0.190 22.3 C R 0.800 0.250 24.3 C WB L 0.869 0.340 28.8 D 24.0 C T 0.903 0.390 25.5 D R 0.557 0.450 10.0 B NB L 0.060 0.350 16.4 C 23.9 C TR 0.766 0.250 27.0 D SB L 0.567 0.350 23.3 C 22. 1 C T 0.597 0.250 22.7 C R 0.103 0.390 12.5 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 23.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.785 LOS = C 1(0 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & DRIVEWAY NO. 3 jq 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/DRIVEWAY No.3 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. .. . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 32 134 96 20 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 419 983 51 22 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 44 45 15 14 = 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 O 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.355 0.622 7.2 B 6.0 t B TR 0.450 0.622 5.9 B WB L 0.277 0.622 6.0 B 22.8 C TR 0.992 0.622 25.0 D NB L 0.228 0.289 18.6 C 17.2 C TR 0.141 0.289 15.3 C SB L 0.050 0.289 17.6 C 15.9 C TR 0.079 0.289 15.0 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.750 LOS = C 1 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/DRIVEWAY Na.3 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EH WB NB SB LT 58 60 45 99 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 965 465 92 113 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 95 81 72 71 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 58.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.128 0.656 4.4 A 22.3 C TR 0.978 0.656 23.3 C WB L 0.604 0.656 13.2 B 4.9 A TR 0.508 0.656 4.0 A NB L 0.173 0.256 19.9 C 18.7 C TR 0.410 0.256 18.3 C SB L 0.358 0.256 21.2 C 19.6 C TR 0.456 0.256 18.7 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.832 LOS = C 1J 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/DRIVEWAY No.3 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 111 59 40 148 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 479 476 177 169 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 41 155 80 106 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 4 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.485 0.511 12.1 B 1i.1 B TR 0.614 0.511 10.9 B WB L 0.190 0.511 9.1 B 11.3 B TR 0.765 0.511 11.6 B NB L 0.108 0.400 12.9 B 12.7 B TR 0.402 0.400 12.7 B SB L 0.386 0.400 14.9 B 13.6 B TR 0.435 0.400 12.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.620 LOS = B ly' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/DRIVEWAY No.3 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB s EB WB NB SF LT 111 59 40 148 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 - L 12.0 TH 479 476 177 169 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 41 155 80 106 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 4 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.485 0.511 12.1 B 11.1 B TR 0.614 0.511 10.9 B WB L 0.190 0.511 9.1 B 11.3 B TR 0.765 0.511 11.6 B NB L 0.108 0.400 12.9 B 12.7 B TR 0.402 0.400 12.7 B SB L 0.386 0.400 14.9 B 13.6 B TR 0.435 0.400 12.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.620 LOS = B 20 rt WAFT'I NG FIVE CORNERS ZI 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Y2- INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . .. . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES E/5 Sy T /so,t R? 7, VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 91 31 31 114 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 170 531 332 444 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 64 307 80 1 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.367 18.8 C 22.5 C TR 0.514 0.283 24.0 C WB LT 1.298 0.283 R 0.628 0.333 23.3 C NB L 0.077 0.308 22.4 C 43.1 E T 0.947 0.225 50.2 E R 0.220 0.275 21.7 C SB L 0.074 0.308 22.3 C 105.3 F TR 1.180 0.225 126.6 F INTERSECTION: Delay = # (sec/veh) V/C = 0.877 LOS = # ZZ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS y/ SUMMARY REPORT Z INTERSECTION. .WAPPINS FIVE CORNERS1xvoTE 7y AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES 0 : GEOMETRY flo TL- 7'/ EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 91 31 31 6 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 LTR 13.0 TH 170 531 332 337 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 64 307 80 294 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ER LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 26.0 t 26.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.367 18.8 C 22.5 C TR 0.514 0.283 24.0 C WB LT 1.298 0.283 R 0.628 0.333 23.3 C NB L 0.068 0.308 22.3 C 43.1 E T 0.947 0.225 50.2 E R 0.220 0.275 21.7 C RoE 7 LTR 1 .985 0.225orlifN --- ----------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = # (sec/veh) V/C = 1.127 LOS = # 23 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Z INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/5/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ls E SHED Z T 7v VOLUMES a GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB ER WB NB SB LT 413 21 70 255 L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 667 303 440 510 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 97 250 344 9 a 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 U 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE_ M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 32.5 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.731 0.404 35.4 D TR 1.449 0.321 WB LT 0.838 0.321 32.8 D 26.8 D R 0.459 0.371 18.9 C NB L 0.077 0.363 19.1 C 43.1 E T 1.011 0.279 58.1 E R 0.789 0.329 28.8 D SB L 0.074 0.363 19.0 C 66.5 F TR 1.112 0.279 89.8 F INTERSECTION: Delay = # (sec/veh) V/C = 1 .029 LOS = # 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Z INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS// ou;rg 79' AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES AT 7y : GEOMETRY 711 EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 413 21 70 48 L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 - LTR 13.0 TH 667 303 440 142 TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 97 250 344 114 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 32.5 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.731 0.404 35.4 D TR 1.449 0.321 WB LT 0.838 0.321 32.B D 26.8 D R 0.459 0.371 18.9 C NB L 0.130 0.363 19.5 C 43.1 E T 1.011 0.279 58.1 E R 0.789 0.329 28.8 D y SB 7-ILTR 1.584 0.133 INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.002 LOS = * as 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . .. .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. .. . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . .. . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Sc' sr1 Er fad 7y VOLUMES s GEOMETRY ER WB NB SB : EB WB NB SEA LT 174 32 91 184 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 341 283 380 356 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 86 2Ci3 191 2 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK.G BUSES PHF PEDS'PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 29.0 25.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.350 19.8 C 43.2 E TR 0.985 0.267 52.8 E WB LT 0.809 0.267 33.3 D 28.6 D R 0.437 0.317 21.4 C NB L 0.077 0.333 20.8 C 39.8 D T 0.975 0.250 52.9 E R 0.481 0.300 22.8 C SB L 0.074 0.333 20.8 C 31.2 D TR 0.855 0.250 36.6 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 36.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.741 LOS = D i985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS//OJre y AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . sous . . sPEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES AO-r 7* : GEOMETRY Qov9C 75/ EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 174 32 91 35 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 LTR 13.0 TH 341 283 380 124 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 86 203 191 133 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK.G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EH 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 N 13.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 29.0 25.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.077 0.350 19.8 C 43.2 E TR 0.985 0.267 52.8 E WB LT 0.809 0.267 33.3 D 28.6 D R 0.437 0.317 21.4 C NH L 0.184 0.333 21.6 C 39.9 D T 0.975 0.250 52.9 E R 0.461 0.300 22.8 C S 7y LTR 0.949 0.217 6 E 52.6 E t s----------------------------------- ------ ---------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 39.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.596 LOS = D r7 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . 9 . . . . .5/15/B9 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EPA WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 91 31 34 114 s L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 170 531 341 4A7 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 76 307 85 1 s 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.367 18.8 C 22.9 C TR 0.543 0.283 24.4 C WB LT 1.299 0.283 R 0.628 0.333 23.3 C NB L 0.077 0.308 22.4 C 46.3 E T 0.972 0.225 54.8 E R 0.233 0.275 21.8 C SB L 0.074 0.30@ 22.3 C TR 1.294 0.225 INTERSECTION: D lay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 0.905 LOS = * o 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Z INTERSECTION. .WAPP I NG FIVE CORNERS//vL);r0 71K AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES -4?jV: GEOMETRY XvillC EB WB NH SB : EB WB NB SB LT 91 31 34 6 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 LTR 13.0 TH 170 531 341 358 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 76 307 85 294 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SEA 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT x RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.367 18.8 C 22.9 C TR 0.543 0.283 24.4 C WB LT 1.299 0.283 R 0.628 0.333 23.3 C NB L 0.074 0.308 22.3 C 46.3 E T 0.972 0.225 54.8 E R 0.233 0.275 21.8 C S 741 LTR 2.045 0.225 INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.144 LOS = * ag 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT 2. INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . .. .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . ..RR DATE. . .. . . . . . .5/5/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . ..BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Sc'r Sh %Z Fo/C /4 7y) VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 413 21 88 255 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 667 303 495 536 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 106 250 374 9 1 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 O 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EH LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 32.5 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.731 0.404 35.4 D TR 1.468 0.321 WB LT 0.838 0.321 32.8 D 26.8 D R 0.459 0.371 18.9 C NB L 0.077 0.363 19.1 C 67.4 F T 1.138 0.279 101.9 F R 0.858 0.329 33.1 D SB L 0.170 0.363 19.8 C 84.8 F TR 1.168 0.279 115.2 F INTERSECTION: Delay * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.061 LOS 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT 2z INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS1.Xoo7o 7y AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES 4-f 7V: GEOMETRY eov7e 7y EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SEA LT 413 21 Be 48 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 LTR 13.0 TH 667 303 495 157 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 106 250 374 114 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK.G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SF LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 32.5 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.731 0.404 35.4 D TR 1.468 0.321 WB LT 0.838 0.321 32.8 D 26.8 D R 0.459 0.371 18.9 C NB L 0.164 0.363 19.7 C 67.4 F T 1.138 0.279 101.9 F R 0.858 0.329 33.1 D LTR 1.656 0.133 r INTERSECTION: Delay = # (sec/veh) V/C = 1.033 LOS = # 31 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Z INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/ AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR lCOMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES f VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NB SB : ES WB NB SR LT 174 32 110 184 t L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 L 11.0 TH 341 283 434 407 : TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 TR 12.0 RT 104 203 223 2 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 t 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 16.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 29.0 25.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.077 0.350 19.8 C 51.6 E TR 1.032 0.267 64.0 F WB LT 0.811 0.267 33.5 D 28.7 D R 0.437 0.317 21.4 C NB L 0.077 0.333 20.8 C 63.3 F T 1.114 0.250 94.3 F R 0.561 0.300 23.9 C SB L 0.074 0.333 20.8 C 42.4 E TR 0.976 0.250 52.1 E INTERSECTION: Delay = 48.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.792 LOS = E 3m2 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .WAPPING FIVE CORNERS/AVTE 741 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES X7 yy s GEOMETRY 7' EB WB NB SB : ES WB NBA SB LT 174 32 110 35 : L 10.0 LT 10.0 L 10.0 LTR 13.0 TH 341 283 434 153 a TR 12.0 R 13.0 T 10.0 12.0 RT 104 203 223 133 : 12.0 12.0 R 10.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 13.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 29.0 25.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS ER L 0.077 0.350 19.8 C 51.6 E TR 1.032 0.267 64.0 F WB LT 0.811 0.267 33.5 D 28.7 D R 0.437 0.317 21.4 C NB L 0.223 0.333 21.9 C 63.5 F T 1.114 0.250 94.3 F R 0.561 0.300 23.9 C 4 B 7y__LTR-----1- 5--- _217------i-9------ --------71-9-----------F----E-- INTERSECTION: Delay = 53.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.836 LOS = E 33 BUCKLAND STREET & PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD 3q 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 37 31 456 52 : L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 43 89 304 382 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 370 17 292 446 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 14.0 s 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 3 1 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SR 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 14.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.145 0.150 28.1 D 16.7 C T 0.171 0.150 17.5 C R 0.656 0.370 15.5 c WB L 0.067 0.150 27.7 D 25.0 C TR 0.216 0.150 24.1 c NB L 0.653 0.220 28.5 D 18.1 C T 0.283 0.320 12.0 B R 0.406 0.470 8.3 B SB L 0.139 0.220 23.9 c 24.2 C TR 0.840 0.320 24.2 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.806 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 136 264 669 154 : L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 142 391 845 514 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 608 E35 409 127 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 17.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 6.0 20.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.444 0.180 28.4 D 22.3 C T 0.471 0.180 17.8 C R 0.886 0.450 22.0 C WB L 0.476 0.180 28.4 D 29.5 D TR 0.811 0.180 30.2 D NB L 0.780 0.270 28.8 D 20.0 C T 0.788 0.320 18.6 C R 0.537 0.500 8.4 B SB L 0.565 0.160 31 .4 D 36.3 D TR 0.939 0.210 37.5 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 25.1 (sec/v h) V/C = 1 .062 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SF : ER WB NB SB LT 47 352 771 233 : L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 161 554 562 320 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 337 108 588 85 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) 7.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 28.0 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EEC LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WEB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 14.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 5.0 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.184 0.150 28.3 D 11.4 B T 0.437 0.220 16.2 C R 0.417 0.530 6.8 B WB L 0.761 0.150 35.8 D 35.1 D TR 0.920 0.220 34.7 D NB L 0.783 0.310 26.7 D 25.1 D T 0.645 0.260 18.5 C R 0.941 0.410 29.1 D SB L 0.651 0.210 30.2 D 30.2 D TR 0.780 0.160 30.2 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 26.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.837 LOS = D 37 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. .. . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . .. . .5/15/69 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NH SB : EB WB NB SB LT 51 24 818 50 : L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 55 100 304 396 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 405 13 282 446 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 O 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-I PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 12.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 32.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.230 0.130 29.7 D 11.7 B T 0.205 0.160 17.2 C R 0.542 0.490 8.7 B WB L 0.060 0.130 29.0 D 24.6 C TR 0.214 0.160 23.6 C NB L 0.780 0.330 25.5 D 20.9 C T 0.412 0.220 15.9 C R 0.529 0.350 12.7 B SB L 0.089 0.330 17.6 C 23.9 C T 0.537 0.220 22.8 C R 0.836 0.350 25.6 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.007 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . suss .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 207 243 909 138 s L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 199 418 845 585 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 796 79 368 127 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR O 0 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.1 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 14.6 18.6 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 10.4 17.5 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.780 0.156 39.8 D 39.9 D T 0.606 0.196 21.4 C R 1.046 0.500 44.6 E WB L 0.506 0.156 30.1 D 28.7 D TR 0.776 0.196 28.0 D NB L 0.942 0.304 37.7 D 24.4 C T 0.744 0.339 17.1 C R 0.488 0.495 8.2 B SB L 0.541 0. 150 31.6 D 35.0 D T 0.944 0.185 40.0 D R 0.245 0.341 15.4 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 30.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.315 LOS = D 39 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SBA : EEC WB NB SEA LT 153 314 1218 210 s L 14.0 L 13.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 250 604 562 424 : T 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 495 96 524 85 : R 14.0 T 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 TR 13.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 4 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 4 SEA 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.4 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 10.2 22.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 10.5 12.3 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.802 0.112 46.6 E 17.0 C T 0.649 0.230 20.6 C R 0.546 0.595 6.0 B WB L 0.909 0.112 51.8 E 40.0 D TR 0.927 0.230 34.7 D NB L 1.051 0.365 59.0 E 39.9 D T 0.582 0.288 14.7 B R 0.860 0.400 22.5 C SB L 0.587 0.210 28.8 D 37.9 D T 0.951 0.133 46.1 E R 0.228 0.245 19.5 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 35.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.115 LOS = D yo SUCKLAND STREET & SOUTH ACCESS ROAD qj 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 20 0 43 s 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 1341 759 s 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 82 172 0 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.)M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0•.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C a/c DELAY LOS APP. DELAY ARP. LOS WB L 0.050 0.260 21.1 c 15.8 C R 0.096 0.340 14.5 B NB T 0.719 0.540 10.0 B 9.0 B R 0.141 0.800 1.1 A SB L 0.316 0.080 33.4 D 5.1 B T 0.333 0.660 3.5 A INTERSECTION: Delay = 8.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.507 LOS = B a 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/DUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . , . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EH WB NB SB : EB WB NEB SB LT 0 86 0 60 : 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 1391 1495 : 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 446 340 0 : 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N O 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH--4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.199 0.280 20.9 C 16.7 C R 0.480 0.370 15.8 C NB T 0.790 0.510 12.1 B 10.0 B R 0.282 0.790 1.4 A SB L 0.391 0.090 33.4 D 7.6 B T 0.677 0.640 6.6 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.700 LOS = B L13 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/99 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB s EB WB NB SB LT 0 122 0 86 s 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 1236 944 : 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 663 523 0 s 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 ti WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SLR 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11. 1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.282 0.290 21.5 C 19.3 C R 0.713 0.370 18.9 C NB T 0.702 0.510 10.7 B 8.0 B R 0.434 0.790 1.7 A SB L 0.561 0.090 36.4 D 6.9 B T 0.427 0.640 4.3 A INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.764 LOS = B qq 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB a EB WB NB SB LT 0 20 0 43 a 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 1693 801 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 82 172 0 s 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR 0 0 0 0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 a 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 v WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.050 0.260 21.1 C 15.8 C R 0.096 0.340 14.5 B NB T 0.908 0.540 16.1 C 14.7 B R 0.141 0.800 1.1 A SB L 0.316 0.080 33.4 D 5.1 B T 0.352 0.660 3.6 A INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.623 LOS = B MY 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SF LT 0 66 0 60 : 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 O 1590 1733 : 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 446 340 0 : 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR O 0 O 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11 .1 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EH LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.199 0.280 20.9 C 16.7 C R 0.480 0.370 15.8 C NB T 0.903 0.510 17.0 C 14.2 B R 0.282 0.790 1.4 A SB L 0.391 0.090 33.4 D 8.8 B T 0.784 0.640 7.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.739 LOS = B y( 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .SOUTH ACCESS DRIVE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. .. . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NH SB s EB WB NB SB LT 0 122 0 86 s 12.0 L 11.0 T 14.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 1619 1170 : 12.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 663 523 0 s 12.0 R 13.0 R 14.0 T 14.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SEA 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.1 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD SREEN 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.282 0.280 21.5 G 19.3 C R 0.713 0.370 18.9 C NB T 0.920 0.510 17.9 C 14.0 B R 0.434 0.790 1.7 A SR L 0.561 0.090 36.4 D 6.9 E T 0.530 0.640 4.7 A INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.890 LOS = B y 4 BUCKLAND STREET & I-84 HOV RAMPS Woo"' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 HOV RAMPS/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB a EB WB NB SB LT 112 0 21 0 a L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH 0 0 1229 713 R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 36 0 172 66 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK6 BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N O 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 O 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EEC LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY ARP. LOS EB L 0.185 0.380 15.7 C 14.2 B R 0.050 0.470 9.3 B NB L 0.147 0.090 31.9 D 8.5 B T 0.659 0.540 9.3 B R 0.123 0.920 0.2 A SEA TR 0.537 0.410 10.7 B 10.7 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.463 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 HOV RAMPS/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NH SB LT 179 0 22 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH 0 0 1244 1437 : R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 48 0 340 85 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N B.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.432 0.260 23.9 C 21.6 C R 0.085 0.370 13.2 B NB L 0.126 0.110 30.5 D 3.9 A T 0.546 0.660 4.4 A R 0.242 0.920 0.2 A SB TR 0.839 0.510 14.4 B 14.4 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.630 LOS = B 5-0 r- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .I-84 HOV RAMPS/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. .. . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. .. . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 170 0 16 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH O 0 1067 951 : R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 58 0 523 115 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY ARP. LOS EB L 0.281 0.380 16.4 C 14.6 B R 0.081 0.470 9.4 B NB L 0.112 0.090 31.8 D 5.3 B T 0.572 0.540 7.4 B R 0.373 0.920 0.3 A SB TR 0.737 0.410 14.4 B 14.4 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.476 LOS = B 51 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 HOV RAMPS/PUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SS : EB WB NB SB LT 155 0 21 0 L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH 0 0 1538 757 : R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 36 0 172 64 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SEA LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY ARP. LOS EB L 0.256 0.380 16.2 C 14.9 B R 0.050 0.470 9.3 B NB L 0.147 0.090 31.9 D 11.9 B T 0.825 0.540 13.0 B R 0.123 0.920 0.2 A SB TR 0.565 0.410 10.9 B 10.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.590 LOS = B CQ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 HOV RAMPS/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/B9 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SS : EB WB NH SB LT 207 0 22 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH 0 0 1415 1682 : R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 46 0 340 78 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 r_ WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SEA 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.500 0.260 24.7 C 22.5 C R 0.085 0.370 13.2 B NB L 0.126 0.110 30.5 D 4.8 A T 0.621 0.660 5.5 B R 0.242 0.920 0.2 A SB TR 0.969 0.510 22.2 C 22.2 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.725 LOS = B S3 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 HOV RAMPS/BUCKLAND ST ' AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SEA LT 224 0 16 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 14.0 TH O O 1396 1189 : R 14.0 12.0 T 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 58 0 523 103 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 22.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 22.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EEC L 0.370 0.380 17.2 C 15.6 C R 0.081 0.470 9.4 B NB L 0.112 0.090 31.8 D 7.8 B T 0.749 0.540 10.4 B R 0.373 0.920 0.3 A SB TR 0.889 0.410 20.1 C 20.1 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 13.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.592 LOS = P t.J q r-- BUCKLAND STREET & I-84 EB RAMPS ss 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 EB RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/B9 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SEA LT 510 0 0 90 = L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 911 659 L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 163 0 155 0 R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.8 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.423 0.380 17.5 C 16.7 C R 0.281 0.380 14.0 B NB T 0.877 0.310 24.0 C 20.8 C R 0.147 0.690 2.5 A SB L 0.149 0.190 25.7 D 8.5 B T 0.354 0.540 6.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.524 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 EB RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY ER WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 814 O 0 370 s L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH O 0 792 1142 : L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 216 0 525 0 : R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T ER 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.8 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.674 0.380 20.6 C 19.4 C R 0.373 0.380 14.6 B NB T 0.875 0.270 25.8 D 17.4 C R 0.530 0.650 4.7 A SB L 0.507 0.230 26.0 D 13.0 B T 0.613 0.540 8.8 P INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.692 LOS = C V 117 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 EB RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST.. . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES s GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB s EB WB NEB SB LT 776 0 0 117 : L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 829 894 : L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 269 0 244 0 s R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK.G BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) 7.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.B 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.626 0.390 19.4 C 18.2 C R 0.453 0.390 14.9 B NB T 0.798 0.310 19.2 C 15.4 C R 0.229 0.700 2.5 A SB L 0.205 0.180 26.6 D 9.4 B T 0.489 0.530 7.1 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.601 LOS = B 5y 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 ES RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY ER WB NB SB : ES WB NB SB LT 809 O 0 133 : L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH O 0 921 660 : L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 163 0 155 0 : R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK:G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.8 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.670 0.380 20.6 C 19.5 C R 0.281 0.380 14.0 B NB T 0.886 0.310 24.5 C 21.3 C R 0.147 0.690 2.5 A SB L 0.220 0.190 26.1 D 9.5 B T 0.354 0.540 6.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.649 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 EB RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SF : EB WB NB SB LT 970 0 0 601 s L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 807 1156 : L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 216 0 525 0 R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.8 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 22.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.804 0.380 23.7 C 22.1 C R 0.373 0.380 14.6 B NB T 0.892 0.270 26.7 D 18.0 C R 0.530 0.650 4.7 A SB L 0.823 0.230 32.8 D 17.1 C T 0.620 0.540 8.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 18.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.836 LOS = C 60 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . I-84 EEC RAMPS /BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 1073 0 0 339 L 14.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 14.0 TH 0 0 861 910 L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 269 0 244 0 R 14.0 12.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 24.8 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 24.8 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 12.3 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT SB LT X TH TH X X RT RT PD PD GREEN 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 17.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.866 0.390 25.9 D 23.7 C R 0.453 0.390 14.9 B NB T 0.829 0.310 22.0 C 17.7 C R 0.229 0.700 2.5 A SB L 0.593 0.180 29.8 D 13.3 B T 0.497 0.530 7.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 18.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.797 LOS = C 401 FUCKLAND STREET & TOLLAND TURNPIKE 0a 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB ; ES WB NB SB LT 146 208 231 197 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 187 608 469 461 L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 103 333 111 179 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 19.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 19.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.230 0.200 25.5 D 19.9 C T 0.236 0.230 20.3 C R 0.157 0.430 11 .3 B WB L 0.611 0.200 29.9 D 23.5 C T 0.789 0.230 26.5 D R 0.508 0.430 13.9 B NB L 0.678 0.200 31 .6 D 25.0 D T 0.666 0.210 24.8 C R 0.178 0.410 12.1 B SB L 0.310 0.200 26.0 D 19.5 C T 0.655 0.210 20.6 C R 0.286 0.410 9.3 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 22.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.733 LOS = C 03 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB ND SB : EB WB NB SB LT 570 300 227 455 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 669 326 584 601 : L 12.0 T - 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 433 239 361 362 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31 .8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 20.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APR. LOS EB L 0.855 0.210 36.0 D 28.0 D T 0.843 0.230 28.4 D R 0.676 0.420 16.8 C WB L 0.839 0.210 39.4 D 25.3 D T 0.423 0.230 21.4 C R 0.373 0.420 13.0 B NB L 0.701 0.190 33.1 D 25. 5 D T 0.830 0.210 29.1 D R 0.564 0.420 14.9 B SB L 0.754 0.190 32.6 D 25.0 D T 0.854 0.210 27.8 D R 0.566 0.420 10.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 26.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.005 LOS = D 408 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EH WB NB SB LT 326 323 222 268 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 447 415 392 405 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 293 248 377 419 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 s 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.10 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 3 SEA 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 21.5 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18. 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.459 0.225 25.8 D 22.0 C T 0.617 0.210 24.1 C R 0.475 0.405 14.5 B WB L 0.843 0.225 38.5 D 26.1 D T 0.590 0.210 23.8 C R 0.402 0.405 13.9 B NB L 0.668 0.195 31 .7 D 21 .8 C T 0.557 0.210 23.4 C R 0.569 0.435 14.4 B SB L 0.433 0.195 27.2 D 18.0 C T 0.575 0.210 17.2 C R 0.632 0.435 12.8 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 21.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.937 LOS = C 6s 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 145 208 273 197 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 207 683 480 464 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 113 333 111 177 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) t Y.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31 .8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD PD WB LT x SB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD PD GREEN 19.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 19.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.228 0.200 25.5 D 19.8 C T 0.261 0.230 20.4 C R 0.172 0.430 11.3 B WB L 0.611 0.200 29.9 D 26.2 D T 0.886 0.230 31.0 D R 0.508 0.430 13.9 B NEB L 0.801 0.200 37.4 D 27.3 D T 0.682 0.210 25.1 D R 0.178 0.410 12.1 B SEA L 0.310 0.200 26.0 D 19.5 C T 0.659 0.210 20.6 C R 0.283 0.410 9.3 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 23.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.767 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EEC WB NB SB : EB WB NB SEA LT 566 300 255 455 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 770 386 603 622 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 484 239 361 355 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK:G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE 7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 L WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31 .8 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EEC LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 20.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.849 0.210 35.6 D 32.9 D T 0.970 0.230 39.8 D R 0.756 0.420 i6.8 C WEB L 0.839 0.210 39.4 D 25.3 D T 0.501 0.230 22.0 C R 0.373 0.420 13.0 B NB L 0.788 0.190 37.3 D 27.3 D T 0.857 0.210 30.4 D R 0.564 0.420 14.9 B SB L 0.754 0.190 32.6 D 25.9 D T 0.B84 0.210 29.5 D R 0.555 0.420 10.8 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.050 LOS = D G'J 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .TOLLAND TPKE/BUCKLAND ST AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB s EB WB NEB SB LT 322 323 273 268 : L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 L 14.0 TH 553 528 430 434 : L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 342 248 377 406 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : T 14.0 R 14.0 R 14.0 T 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 R 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.3 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31 .8 3 SR 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 31.8 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NEB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SEA LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 21.5 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.5 20.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.451 0.225 25.7 D 23.3 C T 0.763 0.210 26.7 D R 0.554 0.405 15.4 C WB L 0.843 0.225 38.5 D 27.1 D T 0.750 0.210 26.5 D R 0.402 0.405 13.9 B NB L 0.822 0.195 39.3 D 24.5 C T 0.611 0.210 24.0 C R 0.569 0.435 14.4 B SB L 0.433 0.195 27.2 D 19.1 C T 0.617 0.210 20.1 C R 0.612 0.435 12.6 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 23.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.001 LOS = C g PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & LONG HILL ROAD 9 z'i'Ui'-;_UN'I'ilt)1,1,:•:i i ti'; ;;:: ':` i :'.: i)i? ?•'_ 269 cOfVT 1o'/VG- T Tjt i= . ;;r•<- .r I' %7I - p/pSEG7G/ 7.t'/AL ,lj`iC 1 i/vim 5 DATE Cit: oN6, H/// D n JIL eR1,A5/9n/T le7 Ail A 04 LoNU o-li// ID N—S E—W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 338 TABLE I0-5. CAPACITY OF A Two-sY•Two LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND PLI'TS c^PACrr, VOLUME/CAPACITY DEK^NO SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 t.sw 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tout np.oc7.'dt kµ 90MCE Rd. TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE L[vELorSERViCE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEG TINS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH c DZMAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 8Y 2 2 BY 4 4 8Y 4 30/50 1.200 1,800 2,200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2.070 60/40 1.080 1.660 1.970 65/33 1.010 1,630 1.880 70/30 960 1.610 1.820 PACITY OP i'UI'-LUN'i'llt)1,1,•:i I ti'; i:i3 i , .. i)P., NO. rER ark-CT T ON: j 1 AS 9/VT Al.L y /D -- LC V, 6TMEOF Ac DATE C 4^ a0 M o Asp icy 2 y/6 N N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 7/5 35 079' TABLE 10-5. C,kPACnY OF A TWO-BY-TWO LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS n CAPACITY* VOLUME/CAPACITY 6 DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 30/50 1.900 55/45 1.800 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tetal eap eicy; Iq SOURCL Rd TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEG TIONS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DECO NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 30/50 1,200 11800 2,200 55/45 1.140 1,720 2,070 60/40 1.080 1,660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1,630 1,880 70/30 960 1.610 1,820 MRCS.rd.w 71 C" PAI-ITY OF T ruwag ow ExTEe/yA J_. 35 N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 87 S3 y 7Z) TABU 10.5. CAPACITY OF A Two-BY-TWO LANE FOUR-WAY TO!-Commo LED INTERsECnON FOR VARious DEMAND Spun GPACrre VOLUME/CAPACITY DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 1.800 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tid np+dcr:all I t. sotlt s TA9LE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVL•L-oF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEG TIONS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME,VPH Do"" NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE 4f SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 50/50 1.200 1.800 2.200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2.070 60/40 I.080 1.660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.880 70/30 960 1.610 1.820 InIMCF Rd to a ITY OF J')TI, NO.ON'll I T 10 t-1 vsrEPIZI:7Cr V--TTT DATE Gl: AN;L"tS lGi za N N 7' 911el 1/0 leo N-S E—W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 359' 7y2 30 TABLE 10-5. CAPACITY OF A Two-ey-Two LAI,.,F-FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLM C cokp^crrir VOLUME/CAPACITY DEMAND SPLIT vPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 1.800 60/40 1,700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 TOW=po&y.a l,6L SOURCL."f TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECT UN C SERVICE VOLUME,VFH SWCAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 By 2 2 oy 4 4 BY 4 50150 1.200 1.800 2.200 55/45 1,140 1.720 2,070 60/40 1,080 1.660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.880 70/30 960 11610 1.820 PACITY, OF iloil-CONTROLLED p ATER'Cr7CTION: V,—T 1go1w _;Aorle JIMIM46 5TIME0:- DATE OF Ni y z9Z 7 0 N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 3 IS y9 30170 oz_rl TABLE 10-5. CAPACITY OF A TWO-BY-TWO LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS c^p^cn-e VOLUME/CAPACITY DEMAND SPLIT VIPH) 50150 1.900 51/45 1.8m 60/40 11700 65/35 1,600 70/30 1.5m Tow=Puky..an&WL SWJRCL-RoL t TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERsE6 WNS WS C SERVICE VOLUME VPH 00"ND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 By 2 2 By 4 4 By 4 50150 19200 1.8w 2.200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2,070 60/40 1,080 1.6w 1,970 65/35 1,010 1.630 1,880 70/30 960 1.610 1.820 7 q P/ v7p 1,4114FY A -I-- 410fv6- T T ME Of 4 lc DATE 0F A 11 L IwYG ON1 A2MA.5,ol1V;r 1,41),_1 N—S E—W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME. 4;F12 720 2 s . 3 2 TABLE 10-5. CAPAcrry OF A Two-By-Two LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROf I F lNTERsECnON FOR VARious DEmAm SpLrTs CAPACrnr VOLUME/CAPACITY DEMAND SPLIT VFH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 1.3w 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tow apwky,;Sv bgL SOURCE PAL t TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSE6 Tjom LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES — LEVEL OF SERVICE— Cf 0,e SPLIT 2 By 2 2 oy4 4 By 4 50/50 1.200 1,800 2.200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2.070 60140 11080 1.660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.990 70/30 960 1,610 1.320 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & CLARK STREET PACITY 0!-' r!TER r2on'T I T I C,N IN 1)&EY lfb 4. 577/- Ej!F 7- alp T I f E OF il,t.., V T AO low DATE OF APJA*L`-S I 3 W_K&7. C44oe,(' 57Za+77 ti—S E—W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME Z`// 862 ZQ Sa 0-3 TABLE TO-5. CAPACITY OF A.TWO-BY.Two LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VAjuous DEMAND SPLITS CAPACITY VOLUME/CAPACITY 0, 05 DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 35/45 1.8m 60/40 1,700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.5m Tow awedw.'al JWL SOURCL."0 T^wx 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR SOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTEASEC. LOS C SERVICE VOLUME VPH VO4AND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE vLrr 2 vy2 2 BY 4 oy4 50150 1,200 1.800 2,200 55/45 1,140 1,720 2.070 60/40 1,080 1,660 1,970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.980 70/30 960 1.610 1,820 P AIC I TY 0! S A 4-z,on A,P•f''Ef c n 'T'l0N, A71VT Xe 5 1, Ap ,4,e e—Arl_ACVTUee- 7,,4Z) F-,k7,r,elIALT'jr MgE 0. t-1 DATE Ot AI-I L "S1 1.SI ZeFr LMNN 1-7T4,A";of ifIlel 258 17 N—S E—W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 7G 1300 TABLE 10-5. CAPACITY OF A TWO-BY-TWO LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLEDE INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS c^PACrrvA VOLUME/CAPACITY C7 76 DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.9m 55/45 1.800 60140 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Total a*scky.,ag kss. SOURCE PAL t TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LcvcL-OF-SERVICE C SERvicE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSE6 T19-Ns LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE NLrr 2 By 2 2 oy4 4 By 4 50/So 1.200 1.800 2,200 55/45 1,140 1.720 2,070 60/40 11080 1.660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1,880 70/30 960 1,610 1,820 L.: FKe DATE OF W-IMA;tS'l t OF NM w4 Zyrl pz'C'4so V7 Y14//.:7/ Z Z N N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME Zo6 3y z S gyo TABLE 10-5. CkPACI7Y OF A TWO-BY-Tw0 LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS 0 G PACI'IY VOLUME/CAPACITY 60 DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 `1.800 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tow avm&y.,an kw SOURCE.IPA• TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEG T19—N5 LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DWAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 OY 2 2 BY 4 4 9Y 4 50/50 1,200 1.800 Z200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2.070 60/40 1,080 1.660 1.970 65/35 1,010 1,630 1.880 70/30 960 1,610 1.820 I'A'-I 'i'v OF P. rEF E=i T TC h!: /7 / d- CiJit?iC ? c.L DATE OF t- N LItZ fzc-,4;lvll 4 3,;17 s/ ',/dry'D N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME z6z 9:57 zd 80 2i9 Una-10-5. CAP^crry OF A Two-BY-Two LANE FoUR-W^Y STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR Vmuous DEMAND spun CAPACn-e VOLUME/CAPACITY DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 I'm 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tow!=Pcky.82 USL SOURCL"t TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEvm-or-SERvicE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEC- TIONS UX C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 oY4 4 BY 4 50150 1.200 1.800 2,200 55/45 1,140 1,720 2,070 60/40 1.080 1,660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1,880 70/30 1 960 1.610 1.820 26 9 C/C s/i<Li-t:77 T Ijf=E. L.. Of- Ar.;;l_•.':r _ Cf l W DATE OF ANALYSISD: N p o y E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME SAS 73 TAsLE TO-S. GPAcrn OF A Two-ev Two LANE FovR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS Q C GlACITY' VOLUME/CAPACITY o/ 8 / DEMAND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 1.800 60/40 11700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Tout=Pmit1:ao k9L SOURCE;•"9 FABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE UVELOFSERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEC- TIONS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF SERVICE SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 50/50 1,200 1,800 2,200 55/45 1,140 1.720 2.070 40/40 1,080 1,660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.880 70/30 960 1.610 1,820 gl r. 'OF i:)P, T3: EPEFCTTt N': Tit-48E Cl:: s7Re.2:77' i q /Zv 363- C' 5,ree2F7F+ N-S E-W DEMAND SPLIT TOTAL VOLUME 037 2d S o TABLE 10-5. CAPAcrry OF A Two-BY-Two LANE FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROL LM INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS CAPACITle VOLUME/CAPACITY 0, 05 DEM^ND SPLIT VPH) 50/50 1.900 55/45 1.800 60/40 1.700 65/35 1.600 70/30 1.500 Term aw t.an kSL SOURCE Rd 9 TABLE 10-7. APPR xtmATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEC- TIONS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME.VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES LEVEL OF S E R V I C E SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 50/50 1.2W 1.800 2,200 55/45 1.140 1.720 2.070 60/40 1.080 1,660 1.970 65/35 1.010 1.630 1.880 70/30 960 11610 1.820 MM'W 10 a SUCKLAND STREET & DEMING STREET g'3 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 2 28 78 7 THRU 0 39 417 859 RIGHT 28 22 10 1 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 Lf'71ML V 1'7VL.L l l t I l t 8y ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pag -2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 i WESTBOUND 2 i 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 i SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EEC 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES g5- CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2 97 61 61 >59 > E THROUGH 0 130 111 267 111 > 235 ill >C D RIGHT 30 351 351 351 > 321 > B MINOR STREET WB LEFT 30 103 84 84 > 54 > E THROUGH 42 130 112 124 112 > 29 70 >E E RIGHT 24 636 636 636 > 613 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 7 736 736 736 729 A NB LEFT 83 431 431 431 347 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED,, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 11 22 36 53 THRU 24 11 934 646 RIGHT 58 20 46 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WEB NEB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 LMIVG U M7G L 1 L 1 1 21,02 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SF 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET ES LEFT 12 83 63 63 }52 > E THROUGH 26 103 89 164 89 > 65 63 >E E RIGHT 62 472 472 472 > 410 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 83 54 54 >30 > E THROUGH 12 103 89 Be 89 > 32 77 >E E RIGHT 21 303 303 303 > 282 > C MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 57 369 369 369 312 B NEB LEFT 38 556 556 556 518 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES gq 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 12 10 28 22 THRU 11 10 719 677 RIGHT 21 7 11 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 LriIVG Vanuc i L . 7V r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION 1. SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 r, WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET ES LEFT 13 90 79 79 >66 > E THROUGH 12 114 107 146 107 > 99 95 >E E RIGHT 22 454 454 454 > 431 > A MINOR STREET WEB LEFT 11 Be 75 75 >65 > E THROUGH 11 115 108 112 108 > 83 97 >E E RIGHT 7 424 424 424 > 417 > A MAJOR STREET SLR LEFT 24 506 506 506 482 A NB LEFT 30 539 539 539 509 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 12 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK: AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 2 28 78 7 THRU 0 39 434 935 RIGHT 28 22 10 1 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES i 1 i 1 q3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND 2 i 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2 83 48 48 >46 > E THROUGH 0 113 95 229 95 > 197 95 >D E RIGHT 30 313 313 313 > 283 > C MINOR STREET WB LEFT 30 Be 70 70 >40 > E THROUGH 42 114 96 106 96 > 11 54 >E E RIGHT 24 624 624 624 > 600 > A MAJOR STREET SLR LEFT 7 722 722 722 714 A NB LEFT 83 390 390 390 306 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 : PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9r 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 11 22 36 53 THRU 24 11 1036 696 RIGHT 58 20 46 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 9 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURET RADIUS (fit) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAR MINOR RIGHTS EEC 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SR 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NH 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WS 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EP 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WEB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK. PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EEC LEFT 12 83 62 62 > 50 > E THROUGH 26 103 87 158 87 > 59 61 >E E RIGHT 62 440 440 440 > 378 r> B MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 83 52 52 >28 > E THROUGH 12 103 87 85 87 > 28 75 >E E RIGHT 21 265 265 265 > 244 > C MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 57 324 324 324 268 C NB LEFT 38 522 522 522 483 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SP LEFT 12 10 28 22 THRU 11 10 824 775 RIGHT 21 7 11 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 qq ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMESINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTROUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SEA 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.8i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 z PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Boa CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET ED LEFT 13 83 72 72 > 59 > E THROUGH 12 103 96 131 96 > 84 84 >E E RIGHT 22 393 393 393 > 370 > B MINOR STREET WPC LEFT 11 83 69 69 > 59 > E THROUGH 11 103 96 101 96 > 72 85 >E E RIGHT 7 366 366 366 > 359 > B MAJOR STREET SEA LEFT 24 444 444 444 421 A NB LEFT 30 475 475 475 445 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DEMING STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES lbl 4 SUCKLAND STREET & DRIVEWAY NO. 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/B9 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYRE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 0 368 B7B RIGHT 14 0 32 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES i 1 1 03 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (fit) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 i CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ! PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 q CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT U 127 127 127 > 127 > 334 319 B RIGHT 15 334 334 334 > 319 > B MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT D 404 404 404 404 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/69 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 0 1131 733 RIGHT 117 0 104 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT EIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCK.LAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK: PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 r---------------------------------- POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EEC LEFT 0 83 83 83 >83 > y 389 263 C RIGHT 125 389 389 389 > 263 > C MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT D 443 443 443 443 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 108 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. i NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR: OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYRE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ER WB NB SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 0 811 565 RIGHT 154 0 159 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1oq ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 1 i SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 : PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES lld h CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 0 93 93 93 >93 > 476 312 B RIGHT 165 476 476 476 > 312 > B MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 0 510 510 510 510 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & J .C. PENNEY'S (EAST) ha 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED,, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 277 5 THRU 370 732 0 RIGHT 5 0 55 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SEA LANES 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION a SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NEB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 5 97 63 63 58 E RIGHT 59 893 893 893 834 A MAJOR STREET WD LEFT 296 705 705 705 409 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Ps 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . , J .C. PENNY (EAST) NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 86 25 THRU 762 425 0 RIGHT 5 0 153 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 11 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c p M SH R SH(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS MINOR STREET NB LEFT 27 115 97 97 71 E RIGHT 163 697 697 697 534 A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 92 421 421 421 330 P IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 100 5 THRU 453 413 0 RIGHT 8 0 132 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SF LANES 2 2 2 11 9 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 i 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHPOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.G. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES lea CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 5 185 164 164 158 D RIGHT 141 847 847 847 706 A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 107 638 638 638 531 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES la I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDv MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK. AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 277 5 THRU 449 1157 0 RIGHT 5 0 55 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 a a ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 1 i NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS 5.50NB5.50 5.50 0.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J .C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 3 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 5 75 47 47 41 E RIGHT 59 851 851 851 792 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 296 644 644 644 348 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J .C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/B9 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES l 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED,, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES Eg WEB NB S& LEFT 0 86 25 THRU 1167 581 0 RIGHT 5 0 153 NUMBER OF LANES ELF WR NEB SEA LANES 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION Y SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. FENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES l 6 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 27 75 52 52 25 E RIGHT 163 544 544 544 381 B MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 92 244 244 244 152 D IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NH SB LEFT 0 100 5 THRU 699 685 0 RIGHT 8 0 132 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 a8000, ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J .C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES a 9 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 5 GO 67 67 61 E RIGHT 141 725 725 725 584 A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 107 461 461 461 354 B$ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . J.C. PENNY (EAST) DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; LEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & CROFT DRIVE l31 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . Menomonee 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . CROFT DRIVE NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 5 10 THRU 341 608 0 RIGHT 2 0 50 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 13 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SORTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 i 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR. LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ft CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 11 228 228 228 > 217 > C 536 472 A RIGHT 53 736 736 736 > 683 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 5 832 832 832 827 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK. AM HOUR OTHER, INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES P ire 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . CROFT DRIVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ELF WB NB SB LEFT 0 48 2 THRU 708 372 0 RIGHT 17 0 12 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NEB SB LANES 1 1 1 135" ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION X SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES X MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 i SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 13l0 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 2 171 161 161 > 159 > D 361 346 B RIGHT 13 455 455 455 > 442 > A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 51 524 524 524 473 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 13 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDS MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . seem . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . CROFT DRIVE NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR THEFT INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EEC WEB NB SP LEFT 0 24 2 THRU 395 350 0 RIGHT 9 0 6 NUMBER OF LANES ES WB NB SS LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES IS-9 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 2 304 298 298 > 296 > C 517 509 A RIGHT 6 685 685 685 > 679 > A MAJOR STREET WF LEFT 26 774 774 774 749 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CROFT DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & CROFT DRIVE DRIVEWAY NO. 5 yl 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/CROFT DR/DRWY No. 5 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK AM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 58 5 20 68 : L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 TH 377 622 0 0 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 2 322 50 8 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M Y.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.0 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.5 3 NEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 5.0 60.5 0.0 0.0 GREEN 19.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.060 0.715 3.2 A 5.9 B TR 0.368 0.615 6.3 B WB L 0.060 0.715 3.2 A 24.4 C TR 0.965 0.615 24.5 C NB LTR 0.259 0.205 21 .7 C 21.7 C SB L 0.231 0.205 25.3 D 24.8 C TR 0.027 0.205 20.5 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.710 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/CROFT DR/DRWY No. 5 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEAK PM HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : ER WB NB SB LT 10 48 2 379 : L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 TH 763 452 0 0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 17 56 12 47 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11. 5 3 NEB 0.00y 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 G 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EEC LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 6.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.054 0.590 6.6 B 31.6 D TR 0.973 0.480 31.9 D WB L 0.054 0.590 6.6 B 13.0 B TR 0.642 0.480 13.6 B NEB LTR 0.033 0.330 14.7 B 14.7 B SB L 0.778 0.330 28.1 D 26.7 D TR 0.100 0.330 15.0 B INIERSECTION: Delay = 24.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.793 LOS = C 6 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .PLEASANT VALLEY RD/CROFT DR/DRWY No. 5 AREA TYPE. . . . .OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . .RR DATE. . . . . . . . . .5/15/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . .PEnK SAT HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . .BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES GEOMETRY EEC WB NB SR : EB WB NB SB LT 16 24 2 114 : L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 TH 511 466 0 0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 9 90 6 14 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 FAR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PING BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y.) 7.)Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EEC 0.00 4.00 N O O 0.95 50 N 11.5 3 WEB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 4.00 N 0 O 0.95 50 N 14. 5 L SB 0.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 6.0 46.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.054 0.580 6.9 B 14.1 ' B TR 0.662 0.470 14.4 B WB L 0.054. 0.580 6.9 P 15.4 C TR 0.726 0.470 15.7 C NB LTR 0.018 0.340 14.2 B 14.2 B SEA L 0.226 0.340 18.0 C 17.6 C TR 0.029 0.340 14.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.461 LOS = C PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & WHEELER ROAD r 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/69 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYRE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WP NB SS LEFT 2 0 70 THRU 273 625 0 RIGHT 0 3 26 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SD LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (f t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SEA 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES l Y CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SR LEFT 75 250 250 250 > 175 > D 290 188 D RIGHT 28 516 516 516 `r 489 > A MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 2 590 590 590 588 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 : PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Ply 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDO MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/B9 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK: PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 1 0 14 THRU 711 357 0 RIGHT 0 17 12 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 9 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page--2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES 1 MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP' MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EEC 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 r PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ls CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SEA LEFT 15 190 190 190 > 175 > D 287 259 C RIGHT 13 714 714 714 > 701 > A MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT i 801 801 801 eoo A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ! PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1955 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED! MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SS LEFT 1 0 7 THRU 397 344 0 RIGHT 0 8 6 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 S~Z ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHPOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SEA 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SS LEFT 7 318 318 318 > 311 > 8 430 416 A RIGHT 6 730 730 730 > 724 ? A MAJOR STREET ES LEFT i 823 823 823 822 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Isy 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . memo 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER. INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 2 0 70 THRU 367 647 0 RIGHT 0 3 26 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 l,Ss_ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (fit) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N 4 VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/B9 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pag -3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SR LEFT 75 209 20B 208 > 133 > D 247 145 D RIGHT iB 501 501 501 > 474 > A MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 2 575 575 575 573 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/B9 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Rage-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . soon 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 1 0 14 THRU 776 484 0 RIGHT 0 17 12 NUMBER OF LANES r-. EB WB NB SB LANES 1 i 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ;, PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES S9 r CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pag -3 7---------------------------------- POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 15 139 139 139 > 124 > D 216 189 D RIGHT 13 614 614 614 > 601 > A MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 1 690 690 690 689 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 00 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 1 0 7 THRU 529 476 0 RIGHT 0 8 6 NUMBER OF LANES EEC WB NB SB LANES 1 i 1 l ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURES RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 i CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF' MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6a CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SEA LEFT 7 211 211 211 > 203 > C 304 290 C RIGHT 6 624 624 624 > 617 > A MAJOR STREET ER LEFT 1 705 705 705 704 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/B9 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES N3 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD & DRIVEWAY N0. 4 l(o 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDa MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . seamen . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD Y NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 495 949 0 RIGHT 0 144 10 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 i Aos- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB PADIU9 (f t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 2. N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION G SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SEA 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EEC 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 0 96 96 96 >96 > 302 291 C RIGHT li 302 302 302 > 291 > C MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 0 331 331 331 331 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ! PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6/7 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/139 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NH SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 1154 556 O RIGHT 0 25 10 NUMBER OF LANES Y' EB WF NB SB LANES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 : PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAFTED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 0 95 95 95 >95 > 556 545 A RIGHT 11 556 556 556 > 545 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 0 622 622 622 622 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 17 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED! MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY NO. 4 NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/B9 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WS NB SB LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 631 582 0 RIGHT 0 40 10 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 i NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 i 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED. SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SEA 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY NO. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK: SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1f7) CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 4 148 148 148 > 148 > 533 522 A RIGHT 11 533 533 533 > 522 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 0 594 594 594 594 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . PLEASANT VALLEY RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY NO. 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 13 SUCKLAND STREET & SMITH STREET oy 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDO MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK. AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 29 14 0 THRU 0 344 852 RIGHT 28 0 12 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 IY- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 i CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL . FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EEC LEFT 28 136 134 134 > 106 > D 192 138 D RIGHT 27 352 352 352 > 325 > B MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT 15 429 429 429 414 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 7--------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES l'1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 16 42 0 THRU 0 1024 780 RIGHT 15 0 24 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURES RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 s PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EEC LEFT 15 83 78 78 >63 > E 127 98 E RIGHT 14 365 385 385 > 371 > B MAJOR STREET Ng LEFT 45 461 461 461 416 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCK.LAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 16 30 0 THRU 0 687 616 RIGHT 22 0 22 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N t VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF' MINOR RIGHTS ER 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES i- CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 7---------------------------------- POTEN-ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET ER LEFT 15 ill 107 107 >92 > E Y 195 159 D RIGHT 21 488 498 4BB > 467 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 32 568 568 568 536 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BtUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED} MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAK.: HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . ."some . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . s . ss BUCK.LAND STREET NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK. AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 36 14 0 THRU 0 354 882 RIGHT 28 0 58 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 18"y ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHPOUND 2 1 J. CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL . FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pc ph) c (pc ph) c (pc ph) c (pc ph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 34 123 121 121 >86 > E 166 105 D RIGHT 27 326 326 326 > 299 > C MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT 15 387 387 387 372 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 18'( 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED! MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . , RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 53 42 0 THRU 0 1089 822 RIGHT 15 0 32 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 J 7 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.90 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . $UCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 g READ PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 51 83 78 .>78 >27 > E 94 29 E RIGHT 14 362 362 362 > 348 > B MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT 45 434 434 434 389 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES l q 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BUCKLAND STREET NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 27 30 0 THRU 0 781 702 RIGHT 22 0 34 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES i 1 1 l90 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Rage-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF MINOR RIGHTS EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 26 83 80 80 >54 > E 126 79 E RIGHT 21 428 428 428 > 407 ? A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 32 501 501 501 469 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . , . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BUCKLAND STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES SMITH STREET & WHEELER ROAD 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . wassawassommus RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ER WB NB SB LEFT 0 14 3 THRU 26 14 0 RIGHT 31 0 7 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 M4 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES Y. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 i WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHSOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 3 847 839 839 > 836 > A 944 934 A RIGHT 7 998 998 998 > 990 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 15 1000 1000 1000 985 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES lq( 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pag -1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . assume 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) a . a . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 21 7 THRU 19 32 0 RIGHT 11 0 9 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 i f7 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURES RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES l 98' CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Rage-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NP LEFT 7 838 827 827 > 820 > A 916 899 A RIGHT lei 999 999 999 > 989 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 22 1000 1000 1000 978 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1qq 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR r OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 19 6 THRU 25 29 0 RIGHT 14 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 too() ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 i WESTBOUND 2 1 i NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/69 : PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES a, CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 6 836 826 826 > 619 > A 926 t 909 A RIGHT 11 998 998 998 > 988 ? A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 20 1000 1000 1000 980 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PROJECTED EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES POD 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Rage-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK. AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 14 3 THRU 32 15 0 RIGHT 31 0 7 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 0103 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 i WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES y CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Rage-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE BATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 3 839 832 832 > 829 > A 941 931 A RIGHT 7 998 998 998 > 990 > A MAJOR STREET Wb LEFT 15 1000 1000 1000 985 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 a PEAK AM HOUR OTHER. INFOR,MATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES t aas 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED9 MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 21 7 THRU 20 37 0 RIGHT 11 0 9 NUMBER OF LANES ELF WB NEB SEA LANES 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 i 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NP 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WS 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 B32 821 821 > S13 > A 912 895 A RIGHT 10 999 999 999 > 989 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 22 1000 1000 1000 978 A r- IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK. PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . WHEELER ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . ago 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 19 b THRU 27 30 0 RIGHT 14 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 a Ni ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURBS RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHROUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 i 1 n NORTHBOUND 2 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NEB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5. 50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES pia CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 833 822 822 > 616 > A 924 907 A RIGHT 11 998 998 998 > 988 > A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 20 1000 1000 1000 960 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . WHEELER ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES ail SMITH STREET & DRIVEWAY NO. 6 h 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ease 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 46 1 THRU 33 28 0 RIGHT 6 0 7 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 I 1 1 ai3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 J. 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 i SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 1 804 780 780 > 779 > A 964 956 A RIGHT 7 998 998 998 .= 991 > A MAJOR STREET Wg LEFT 49 1000 1000 1000 951 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/69 ; PEAK AM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pag -1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. b NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 8 5 THRU 28 53 0 RIGHT 1 0 37 NUMBER OF LANES EEC WEB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 c;) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURT RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LAME GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBDUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 1 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 1 SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF' MINOR RIGHTS NEB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WEB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NEB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES ir7 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NEB LEFT 5 826 822 822 > 816 > A 974 929 A RIGHT 40 999 999 999 > 959 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 9 1000 1000 1000 991 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 ; PEAK PM HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEDv MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sage . 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RR DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 5/15/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 12 1 THRU 35 48 0 RIGHT 2 0 it NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES i i 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 1 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 i SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 : PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT i 8i9 813 813 > 812 > A 979 967 A RIGHT 12 998 998 998 > 966 > A MAJOR STREET WEB LEFT 13 1000 1000 1000 987 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . SMITH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . DRIVEWAY No. 6 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 5/15/89 r PEAK SAT HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES w APPENDIX "D" STANDARDS r-. page 1 1. LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service for signalized intersectons is defined in terms of delay.Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level-of-service criteria- are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-minute analysis period. The criteria are given in table 9-1 from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board in their Special Report 209 . Delay is a complex measure, and is dependent on a number of variables, including the qualityof progression, the cycle length, the green ratio , and the v/c ratio for the lane group or approach in question . I*AUUi 9.1. L uvEL-OI-•JEMVICL- CRITERI^ FOR SIGNALIZU13 INTU-SECTIONS STOPPED DELAY PER VEHICLE LEVEL OF SERVICE SEC) A S 5.0H5.1 to 15.0C15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F 60.0 Level-of-Service A describes operations with very low delay, i .e. , less than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase .Most vehicles do not stop at all . Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. page 2 Level-of-Service 8 'describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for Level of Service A, causing higher levels of average delay. f Lev 1-of-Service C describes operations with delay in the iange of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level . The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level , although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level-of-Service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle.At lever D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable . Level-of-Service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60 .0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios.. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. page 3 Level-of-Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 68. 0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i .e. , when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures.Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also'be major contributing causes to such delay levels. page 4 2. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The computations described above result in a solution for the capacity of each lane on the minor approaches to a STOP-or-YIELD controlled intersection. Level-of-Service criteria for this methodology are stated in very general terms, and are related to gen ral delay ranges. The criteria are given in Table 10-3 from the Transportation Research Board Special Report 209, and are based on the reserve, or unused, capacity of the lane in question. This value is computed as: CR = CSH - V where: ' CR = reserve or unused capacity of the lane, in pcph; CSH = shared-lane capacity of the lane, in pcph: and V = total volume or flow rate using the lane, in pcph. TABLE 10.3. LEvEL•OF•SFRVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIONAL- ICED N-rBRSECT1ONS RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF LXPLCTED DLLAY TO PCP/I) SERVICE MINOR zTMJZT TR^FF1C 2 AM A Little or no delay 300-399 D Shon ttafrie delays 200-299 C Average ttatfie delays 100-199 D Long tralfte delays 0- 99 E very long traffic delays F t•'M*i.e.awt•010ma abasedo the tayeo.27 of the Let.pule..otters tilt be.e.Mteuted teeth 1.tYMI W%kh we.?ewt+ tt-ate Yn1060A altettiwj etAet Iralfee"v4ppeteY jetthe ee.ter"ese. Thn gw0:t4.•a.ellr..tnawtt a em-ttweett tit the iwantsti.w. APPENDIX "'E" TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AGREEMENT The following is a list of the improvements outlined in the Tax Increment Financing Agreement: Buckland Street - I-84 E.B. Ramps to Town Line South Access Road - Buckland to Mall North Access Road - Buckland to Slater Hale Road Construction - Slater to Route 30 Slater Street - Access Road to Tolland Turnpike Route 30 - Manchester/South Windsor Town Line to Oakland Install Traffic Signals a. Buckland and Access Road- b. Route. 30 and Tolland Turnpike c. _ Chapel Road and Tolland Turnpike Revise Traffic Signals a. Buckland St./Pleasant Valley/N. Access Road b. Route 30/Avery St./I-84 W.B. Ramps C. Route 30/Tolland Turnpike d. Route 30/Route 83/Oakland St./I-84 E.B. Ramps Interconnect Signals - Buckland Street Interconnect Signals - Route 30 Widen South Access Road to provide additional left turn onto Buckland Road southbound Widen Buckland Road to provide additional left -turn into I-84 eastbound ramp Widen Buckland Road and Tolland Turnpike to provide additional through lanes southbound and eastbound Widen Deming Street to provide additional left and right turn into I-84 westbound ramp