The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About198 Talcott Ridge RoadElectric.# 6 l 9 L) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# 198 TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD Dat i iHVAC # A3AS Sprinkl r# No.119 FINAL APPR V LS Estimated Cost $ o2 l 0 6fJ'd Building Z G COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee Engineering TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee Affidavit SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE Appr.for CO. 9 Total Fee ASS TO BOLDING DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Additional Cost) $ — 0 — The undersigned h reby applies to do work according to the following specifications: Job Location l 9 4f Lot No. 3 0 Side of Street /0 Zone Applicant Tel.# FLI6 - 6 Vo'--2 0 d-Q Addr ss Z6-3 K v Zip 61SO 2 Lic.# Own r 6c7 Address Architect & . Address C Sq.Ft.New Area: 1st FI. 41-Y6 2nd FI. 1 9 3rd Fl. Total New Area Rooms Lavatories/ Bathrooms 3 Garages Purpos of this permit: /V&, Ap• Tp City Water Well Septic System SewerX Ins. H.O. S.P. Cert. 6V- Area ' Basement 1598 Garage Approved by Date t (mot Use Group 2 Construction Type 55 Revised 1197 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to ted the rope stanc f all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in ich t is b ' g a d it al Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of c ncy r e o d in his application for the permit. Signed O OT WRITE OW THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS l,ocation of job AFFIDAVIT Additional Fee -0- State of Connecticut ss. County of Hartford c a9 F q al of 1Els E OwnerA)P..c Agent for building erected under ConNctor Permit No. 25.823 issued by the Dept of Building of the 7bwn of South Windsor being duly sworn.make oath and say that the actual cost of the completed work authorized under said permit was 33.900.0 . Signed . . . TZkSubscribedandsworntotoeforemethis . ..... .. . day of A.D. EsCmate Cost:$ 231,900.00 Difference: t 0— Public .. ..... Inspection / Approval Date By Appl Code Description Due Whom Code Comment 99-25823-B 210,000 B01 FOOTING 01/21/99 JFF A WITH CONTRACTOR B02 FOUNDATION 01/28/99 DCJ A B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 04/09/99 DCJ D MISSING LVL SPECS. E03 ROUGH 04/09/99 DCJ A P03 ROUGH 04/09/99 DCJ D NO TEST, NAIL PLATES, MID STORY SUPPORTS H03 ROUGH 04/09/99 DCJ A P03 ROUGH 04/12/99 DCJ A B04 INSULATION 04/13/99 DCJ D NOT READY B04 INSULATION 04/14/99 DCJ A E01 SERVICE 05/21/99 DCJ A RELEASED TO N.U. B10 FINAL 06/24/99 JFF D NOT READY WITH JOSE B10 FINAL 06/28/99 DCJ D CLOSET LIGHTS, ISLAND RECEPTICLE, RELABEL BREAKER B10 FINAL 06/28/99 DCJ A APPROVED FOR CO CLOSEOUT (BLDG) 99-10444-H 9,000 99-10354-P 8,900 99-16196-E 6,000 Total Est Value 233,900 Dwelling 3,688 150,912.96 Basement 1,598 19,815.20 Garage 700 8,680.00 Smoke Det 7 525.00 BOCA Value 203,324.47r,1 Difference 30,575.53) 1 SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 198 TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD LOT_##30 Reviewed B /-- JIeering) CHASE ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reviewed z' I2033ELLINGTONROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Reviewed By a BP #_25823_ Ph ## (860) 648-2006 Date Reviewe Date Submitted 06/24/99 FOR f OAsrequiredintheZoningand/or Subdivison Regulations, no Ce 1 Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: vf I Approved Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan 3 . Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking Z 4. Utility location; a. sanitary sewer/septic system b. foundation drain C. electrical & telephone d. water e. other 5. Sewer connection charge paid 3lict/i9 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding 8. Planning & Zoning/ 67 Inland Wetlands Considerations Sewer Permit No. Pavement Excavation No. COMMENTS: da i/'PC j 'r R i S e !' p'r-f c/r,600 4 Y o s 0-20'1.y SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST vops- TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 198 TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD LOT_##30 Reviewed By J RIJ En ineering)CHASE ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reviewed Approve Denied 2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By a ning)BP_#_25823_ Ph_# (860) 648-2006 Date Reviewe S pprove enied Date Submitted 01/13/99 FOR BUILD PE In accordance with the Zoning and/or Subdivision Regulations, prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a Topographic Plot Plan shall be submitted for approval. The minimum requirements shall include: Approved Denied N/A V -- 1. Name, address & phone number of owner/applicant V_ 2. Name, address & phone number of plan preparer w/ 3. Zoning Information - i.e. zone, open space, floodway, etc. Vol' Z 4. Plot Plan at 1" _ 01 scale a. Subdivision reference, abutting properties, etc b. Easements of record Vel C. Lot description, bearings, building lines, distances, area, etc. d. Contours, existing & proposed, 1 or 2 ft. interval where appropriate e. Building location with dimensions. Elevations of proposed finish floor, garage floor & centerline of road at driveway f. Elevations of gravity drainage systems, sanitary foundation drain at the house and the street g. Tentative utility location (gas(-, water, electric, septic system, etc.) h. Title block with name and address of preparer, date, appropriate certification, live seal and live signature consistent with the Board of Registration requirements. (P.E. & L.S.) 5. Sedimentation and erosion control 6. Special Planning & Zoning, Inland/Wetlands considerations (Plans on file w/Town Clerk) COMMENTS: t 1 DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT PE T# t Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit# APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext.230 4 v Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed I Location ofjob f Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Over $19000 12.00 per$1,000 OAR CA 5r t 5 54 c 101 or any fraction thereof ADDRESS I fiJe el A56t i OWNERS PHONE# a oo 1 APPLICANT es sp l OW N S4t ADDRESS l S 4 4,e7L o 4•-7 G ESTIMATED COST$ vd O C7 o C IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? YES NO l G FEE ENCLOSED $ Za 00 1 f 4 0 COS TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 11/95 F APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION S NO BUSINESS ASSEMBLY CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY MERCANTILE EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY INSTITUTIONAL FACTORY STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE GARAGE MIXED USE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED `l% .Sr v c a C) NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED?YE SON NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS L NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS i NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS /NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPERATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. Id t c? NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PHONE NO. — , _3 7 DATE 5 a i INSPECTOR DATE ,2i TIME LOCATION m Lam.. L oT INSPECTION: CODE: RESULT(D/A) : BUILDING: F t ELECTRICAL:A A&I q g PLUMBING: HVAC: OTHER: DEPARTMENT DECISION PEFMT# APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT 16 54 P Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit# APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext. 230 Date ding Inspector Application must be printed or typed Location ofjob 198 TAT-COTT RTEYZE, ROAD Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Over $1,000 12.00 per$1,000 OWNER or any fraction thereof ADDRESS 2088 PT,T,TNc;rPoN ROAD SOUTH wiNDsoR, CT 06074 OWNERS PHONE# R60 648-9006 APPLICANT FRANK MAURI N SR. ADDRESS 29 BISSELL STREET PAST HARTFORD< CT 06108 ESTIMATED COST$ 8Ct0Q IS THIS A CONTRACT COST?x YES NOmow FEE ENCLOSED $ ME OF JOB:OR-Co X Original Installation Alteration/Addition Repair Revised 10/96 APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION YES / NO X RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY ASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY SINGLE DWELLING EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION FACTORY ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE STORAGE GARAGE ADDRESS MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION ORIGINAL SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN 4" NO. OF TOILETS_STYLE NO. OF URINALS STYLE NO. OF BATHTUBS ( NO. OF SHOWERS )- NO. OF LAVATORIES 4 NO. OF CONDUCTORS SIZE NO. OF STACKS 1 SIZE 3" AREA OF ROOF NO. OF CATCH BASINS NO. OF FLOOR DRAINS NO. OF OTHER FIXTURES 1 KIND WHIRLPOOL ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY A WINDOW YES/M SIZE OF WINDOW3 X 3 IF NONE C.F.M. OF VENTILATOR SIZE OF DUCTS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANKSEWER SIZE OF WATER MAIN 1" SIZE OF WATER PIPING&RISER3/4" & 1/2" WATER HEATER TYPE GAS MANUFACTURE AMERICAN TANKS SAFETY DEVICES TEMPERATURE CAPACITY RELIEF VALVE lo.oYI TEST PRESSURE300 WORKING PRESSURE 150 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE 100XL TYPE MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETE PLUMBING MR- NEW SINGLE—FAMILY THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WO NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIG A OF APPLICANT PHONE NO. 289-9511 DATE 5 ) DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT P T# Application is hereby:TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit# APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext.230 E Date ding Inspector jApplicationmustbeprintedortyped Location ofjob 71--JC 0 7T LjC/ J 0 Street No. Street Lot No.i 1 FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Over $1,000 12.00 per$1,000 OWNER O c, or any fraction thereof ADDRESS OWNERS PHONE# I — LzF—;? O O APPLICANT^ ON S ADDRESS G S /l 0 5 9/v im r/ q< rv) ESTIMATED COST $ d D O C) C IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? NO CJ FEE ENCLOSED $ O — dsOR Cow TYPE OF JOB: ZrOriginal Installation Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 11/95 APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF SYSTEM TYPE OF BUILDING HEATING RESIDENTIAL 7A/C OK COMMERCIAL VENTILATION INDUSTRIAL HEATING STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS.HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HYDRONIC WARM AIRS UNIT RADIANT HEATER EXISTING RADIATION ADDITIONAL RADIATION TOTAL RADIATION DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDEjj,_F INSIDE_2.F DIFFERENCEZz F TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH)eQ o 0 d HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) GROSS HEATING CAPACITY (INPUT-BTUH Yi ,lov NET RATING (OUTPUT-BTUH 00 C7 TYPE OF FUEL OIL-GPM GAS-INP ELECTRIC-KW OIL TANK SIZE&LOCATION INSIDE OUTSIDE CAPACITY LPG TANK CAPACITY AIR CONDITIONING DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE F INSIDE2C_F DIFFERENCES'F TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH) HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) TONNAGE_ COOLING CAPACITY(BTUH) D O VENTILATION DESCRIBE ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUST EQUIPMENT) TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM(CFM) g 0 0 v FRESH AIR INTAKE(CFM) y PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. c3 0 y G - do l V STATE LICENSE-NO. NAME&TYPE IGN OF APPLICANT PHONE NOA 0 7—,3 DATE ennox Cib jecti ve Guide to = nstal 1 ati on Comparison LOGIC Software Group Lennox xndu tri V"- Inc. . Da11 -as , Tx 1 - 800...a2.7 •-3506 ic:.**-:K**k Y kf*K:k c k**K*k c k*k*****K K**:ky c:K**:rc c k K K K K k s k,*K::k k K rye c1E, LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 1 WOODBRIDGE C'PARED FOf PREPA•R D BY : LARRIE MEYER C .A.S. FILE" TITLE : DORAN2 DESIGN TEMPERATURES (DEGREES F ) Wlt',ITER INSIDE 72 WINTER OUTSIDE 0 MMER INSIDE 75 SUMMER OUTSIDE 00 D/,,ILY TEMPERATURE RANGE , INDICATOR M DESIGN GI• IA%lINS RELATIVE HUMIDITY 42 DEGREES NORTH LATITUDE ' 41 11MMER AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 1 . 0 kAilNTFR AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 0 . 7 R:A f:?.TIJH B T 3': FT L..C' tti,,t}! ... • f"f`,1 I L Y f;C'0 M I N Z O N E. 1 9 X 17 1 % 13 R- '! 0 1 ,r'''? OR :) 14 INCH EXTR POLY 1 077 3 3` r1) 3A D0)LIE,LE PANE CL.R GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-t4 45 5 4ri TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHAD7N,G C,,JE'FFICIENT = 1 12•1 '3 R-- '! ,9 .f 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 130 490 i 6 VE:RHANG = 1 . 0 9,'', HARDWO D OR VfNYL FLOOR + NO IN'" 3? :3 214 i:: 0tJr i'! N F I ! T R X;T 1 C'N a''I '•.,F P4 4 1 c; 1,E, I N F ILTRr.TI,-)N 44 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN A'0 LATENT GAIN 1 , 24u L rLf.- 6 SENSIBLE GAIN 1 0 LATENT GAIN 13 f' Cl L. L.0 S'S, M!LT•y . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 83 `' 29 SE"N IELf ATE:.NT 216,26 10/Q6/9E LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 2 WOODBRIDGE= L'OT ##9 AREA BTUH elTUI.I 0t•'I - 2 KITCHEN IN ZONE 1 20 X 1 r 12-i; -• .19 + 1/ OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY I C33 5,'37 D V E F:I i AN Ci w 1 . 0 ps f:.'NG DR r 2 PN CLR GtLAS0 METAL. FACING--N 36' i , 31 96 TINT-T1NTED SHADING- DRAPES OR BLINDS, HARING COEFFICIENT w 1 itJf t+l A DOUBLE PANE C'L.R GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-•N 9 a57 I0; TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COE FFIC CENT 1 REVEAL. w 11. 0 n 19A. HARDWOOD CR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS33E3 ; , 796 ID 1V')'N r ER' :I.NFll TF;'ATI''JN 31 CFM 2 14 18 i 1 1EF' TNF 1L'1"R ",TxJN 44 Cfr1 SENSIBLE GAIN LATENT GAIN 1 s 24 G +. VEN-r ! LA"I ON `al) . 0 CFIM a , )F3t'7 8 6 BEN:; I6LE GAIN 1 u C)(:t I_ATENT GAIN 1380 i 1iP _ l /''.N,'-"F I fl 1" LC''_ : rlIJLT, . 10 (aA.IN 1,.1ULT Q SENSIBLE 14 , a 97 5 , 720 LATENT 4 , 054 L C.C,' I _ a C,INI.NG R',-)OM IN ZONE 1 13 X 15 I,. i _. ? R -- 1 `;) 1/2 (-)R 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 9Ul 3 'I 0 f.3t) r 00 IJ E L,t I'A N-. 'w L R GI.A 1+00D F R Ptl FACING..N I 3 7 .i 4 TTNT--TINTE[I SHADING- DRAPES 1•1AL.F DRAWN HADING 'l':()CFFl('.'lENT - 1 l 1 ' I 3 F; 19 + / ' OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 1 ',"? 1 '! Cl VE F:H,PJ'i - 1 , U 1 Lan. HARDWO':.'D OR VINYL. FLOOR + NO y i 9 a 2 t 'I 90 ri 12 F iM F:R T1.11F' 1:._.TR,A.TTC)N FN1 SENSIBLE GAIN LATENT C;AIN 49C3 L. 0EN'IBLr GAIN LATENT GAIN 1 3 8 0 L.. 1 ri G A I.N 'M U L.T_ . 10 24 6 1 LOGIC 1 000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIv PAGE 3 WOODBRIDGE LOT #J F'E A B T I I i•_1 L .F I i F T C,T'r;L. I R0ClM :3 11560 CU FT 19 SENSIBLE 4 14 f 01,`, LATENT I , ti (:: i F; M - 4 LIVING F:;C'OM IN 20NE 1 14 X 13 tly! L.L_ 12 J a t - 19 + 1/2 C)R 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 02 9 15 1 W 3 DC.IELE PANE CLr GLAaS WOOD FRi l FACING- 3 a 1 ; 191) t+ r T'.1N.F TINTED SHADING--DRAPE - HALF DRAWN I N COEFFICIENT - 1 1 .. ...I:3 R - 19 i" 112 C,R 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 1 ,'?0 4:32- i 'f OVERHANG = 1 . 0 191, HA.R'f t 1'OD GF VINYL FLOOR + I'J0 INS IO2 2 ; a44 T'F. I:: INF.`l:LTRATT )r1 20 CFM 12 Tr F TLTF ATItw'r 2t CF I`9 3EN- IBL F GAIN LATENT r,f' IN LATENT GAIN i :, ;,r L IiUi. Tt . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 Cy57 4 '1 SENSIBLE 3131 t+ '5 , r' r i_. i R - 19 + '1 /2 .OR 3/4. IN H EXTt PO'l-Y MF" i.. R c! AS W''.,("',11 F F;F'r,r TINT-TINTEC; I"N DNVI,F F" 1) AWN r.{IN'-.t CnEFF ICIENT - 'I 1 UH F'ANEI... & WOOD STORM ti IfiJTr F; rNF=ILTIRATION 22 CFM M Fti INFIL. TRAT1ON 31 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN LATENT GAIN IS11,:111") pP P L 1-, 2 EENSIBLL: MAIN LATENT GAIN 46() P L J.AN( L 1 i." 0"i i'4'.. i 11.ii."r= . 1 a !!,IN P ULT= . 1 ( 286 2' w 10/06/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 4 WOODS RlD(liE LOT #9 AREA 6'r liH BT,I FT L0 IS GAIN 1 , %'8 0 CU FT 1 6 f) SENSIBLE 3 142 2 j 970 LATENT 1 , 34G, ? F r;I?M - S DEN IN ZONE 'I 11 X 13 LL 12•_3 R- 19 + 1/2 (",R 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 58 209 4 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 rlNGi_)W 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLA'E"S WOOD FRM FACING,-S 30 I g 190 4 7 '7 Ti.NT-TINTED SHADING--DRAPES' HALF DRAWN wHAD,ING COEFFICIENT - I i_C;C 19A F1ARD410OD OR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 143 1 , o()6 I^IT'NT(:R INFILTRATION 20 CFM 1 , G 1 2 IJMME R INFILTRATION 29 OFM SENSIBLE GAIN 80 LATENT 3A IN 830 - EN:aISL.E. GAIN LATENT GAIN 920 L flT Lid',; P1_LT- . 10 iaAIN MULT= . 10 462 341 T Q T A L F'0 R R00M 8 1 , 144 CU FT 14:3 FNSIELE a g o 7 9 LATENT 1 0 1 R I9A HARDWOisD OR 'VINYL ["LOOR + NO INS 56 11,309 V-1I NTER INFI.L.TF,AT10N 0 C F M 0 i+1P1E( INFIL T RATION 0 FM SENSIBLE GAIN LATENT GAIN I LE 1 3::r-IBL.E 3uGAIN c:l LATENT GAIN 230 L. L MULT= . 10 GAIN M_LTM . 10 C3 30 T r"r;( Fr)R F,,CJ0 7 448 CU FT 5(_ SENSIBLE 692 LATENT 2'3 (1 ! CJ1,I - r> M . B . R . IN ZONE 2 18 X 17 1 ,13 R; 1 9 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 99 356 9 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 1 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 5 WOODBRIDGE L_O T #9 ARl:.A BTU P1 BTI.1I C: p T T N w I N D W 3A DOUBLE:: PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FAC1NG•'N TINT-TINTED HADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 WALL 1 :2i "'a R-19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 136 490 1 `6 OVERHANG - 1 . 0 t G! 161:: DARK R-30 INSULATION 306 727 394 i r 1 , "N f= L.T F'A 7'1"l:, 1 3 '1 C.F 4 4 .1 `'c t)P1M1 1 INf ."l.T( 'T C,N 44 (FM SENSIBLE GAIN 7 ''C, LATENT GAIN 11246 L p pLIL 2 - SENSIBLE GAIN E;+Jr1 LATENT GAIN 460 1. i.!I" L MIIL•r= . 'I GAIN MULT= . 10 57 a 4 7 1 "l"llAL Fr;R RkDr)pq f3 2 , 448 C!J FT T i 3 LATENT 1 , l t+b I 9 M . EATH IN 2C',lNF 2 19 x 9 r'.,I. Fz -' 19 + 1•/ OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLYI ?0 490 1 ?c: L P. Ill-A"'' V D. F r 9 = 1C I J i N I C 9 1iAD`1f C —DF,'E. F.1ALP C:i.At-VN AN III..A1 ?.l.lN 406 l 1 6 C m 1..A F E N I^(1 i,. J r•1E 1,ANIr:A1. t. + 7:1.ON 715 , 0 C l E .PLfw 2 SENSIBLF GAIN 12,' LAT 1 TN 0! m_Ii—"r= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 113:3 3 TC! Y L. FrIR ROOM 9 1 , 358 C U FT 17 1 SENSIBLE 94 LATENT a 5 04 L. 1. 10 B . R , 2 1N Z 0 N E 2 0 X 12 1 G11 3 R-- 1 9 + 'I'2 OR 3/4 .INCH . EXTR POLY 130 4L3 s I)VERHANG = 1 . 0 U,'afif 9E3 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 6 WOODBRIDGE:. LOT #J AREA BTUH 2'"ruH! S Q FT L S G a..!"1 tq I rd C:,r)W 3 A D 0!_!P.L.[ PANE w L.F; GLASS WOOD f=F P4 F AC TN O.~ r TINT—TINTED SHADING—DRAPE!3 HALF DRAWN HADING (CDEFFICIENT W 1 i5.1_L 1 2•_13 R— 19 - 1/2 OR .3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 96 346 3'! OVERHANG " 1 d `/ N{; l6 G DAR!<R -30 INSULATION 240 570 tiCl r 1,il 1'1'1 1 N1' 1,LTRAT1ON 20 CFM 1 i INF ILTRATIl')N 28 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN E3E! LATENT GAIN ra SENSIBLE GAIN LATENT GAIN 4(-J0 L L M!iLT . 'I0 GAIN MULT= . 10 419 1 ;C, L. F R RC) M 10 11920 CSU FT 240 EN3IBLE 4j604 LATENT 1 , 2 1 1 B . R . 3 IN `LONE: 2 1 3) X 12 L_ I 2-i 3 R —/1 9 + '1•/2 OR 3' y/ 4 INCH EXTR POLY r 4 13 V E-f 1 ANG •" 1 . 0 INF!i w 3ia• DCUL,l.,.E PANE CLR ('3LAS•S WOOD' FRM FACING 30 1 , "100 47 ': T:CI• 'T';-'r1NTED SHADING--DRAPES HALF DRAWN HADING COEFFICIENT = 1 wF IL.,ING 16G DARK R-30 INSULATION 156, 37 1 tITNTEIR INFILTRATION 20 CFM 1 , 6 12 1 P911L-f; INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENS#16LE GAIN 4E E LATENT GAIN r L; i L SENSIBLE GAIN E: U0 LATENT GAIN 60 l_ T L o,,: MUL..T 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 D- 44 I p r' TC,TAL_ FOR F;O(,)M 1 1 1 , 248 CI_! FT SENSIBLE LATENT I 2 a01 I F u, 11 1 `? P. . R . 4 IN ZONE: 2 1 1 X 13 2•_13 R— 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 5f3 09 54 OVERHANG = '1 . 0 3,6 DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WO, FRM FhCING—S 30 -i 190 4 ? :> TINT—TINTED SHADING —DRAPES HALF DRAWN 101/06/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 7 W0 DBR1DGE LOT #9 AREA 6T!JH t!11 SQ FT Aa N SHADING' COEFFICIENT 1 L 12_3 R— 19 + '1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 48 I ?3 4 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 I+_.INi"." 1 6 , DARK R-30 INSULATION 143 340 84 I1N TFR I.NFILTRATION 20 C FM 15612 UM MER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE i.;A:IN 48tj LATENT GA:Lr-- s. C PEC-1PLE w SENSIBLE: FAIN J 1) LATENT GAIN 4 r") C,, ; P9+.!1_T= , 10 GAIN MUL'i = . 10 3`2 1 TA F R M 1 '2 1 ; 14 U FT 14:' LATENT F•' . 1 j E;i:)N I_ F::)0 M I N N E 3 1 1 X 22 1 2 J 3 R-- 1 o + 1/2 Ors /1+ INCH EXTR POLY 73 263 0 V F RHANIG ._ 1 . 0 4 1F4D W 3A Di-1-1_E.L_E PANE CLR GLAS'1 WOOD FRM FACING -S 15 595 3 19, TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN IiAf Ir? COEFFICT.ENT = 1 4%J',L. r;J R - 1 9 + '1 2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR pC?L.Y 1 28 46 1 1 ., OVERHANG - 1 . 0 14 A.L 1.. 12•J3 R -- '19 + 1/2 ()R 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY i '-r8 461 t:.,VEF:HANG 1 . 0 1 N G 16G 0AR,K R-3 0 INSULATION 242 75 f 1 9A HAR'C—VIOCT) OR VINYL FL..rOR + NO INS 24 :' 2 ; 7 'I 0 INFILTRATION 10 C F M 30f3 1NrTLTR.AT TCN 15 C FM S,E.N *!BL.E GP,,IN L.ATENT (,AIN L.LI Lk)["ILE 4 SENSIBLE: GAIN 1 x U ? LATENT GAIN r)'?i) L_ L 0 M(ILTA z 10 GAT.N MUI..T= . 10 C,TV,' L F,_ . R.0 M 1 u 1 , 936 CU FT 242 SENSIBLE 6 , 415)(i 2 , 5 }4 LATENT LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PACE 8 WOODBRIDGE LOT #9 11,11('Tl!RL, TOTA.I..c 2 'i , 240 CU ET 2 5 as LATENT 24 , 050 (. MINIMUM Cooling rapacity needed is 63 , 379 btU eft 90 .dez-gre s outside and 75 degrees inside maximum Desired Cooling Capacity is 72 , 885 btu 1 1 5% of Total Load) Version 92 . 'I a it rt ;, 00linq LoadCi Computation was t Q d L!C Ci u s 1 tl the b1 of th,-; Ai r C o n d i ti o n i n9 Co'nt ctorr; of Amer,1 c ' 5 M .;nua1 : i . ' 1. it' + i i+t. r`t«i,•y o1 thecalculate loads `der) . n;r I. hr;, • 1.':11 +i1 a boon X C t`,W: E,(J t. t t h i..+ (:1 i :V P' k.r .;km: ;>, 5t;sc;;.;« •:;;k:r,.n:k}:cti:,*m 'ic rk`km:k::'m%is?k*m t :WW:k:Y.`ft:k,.l:::.i; :; ,,,• :;w;;,w, , J P a CUSTOM AIR SYSTEMS, INC. Connecticut License Numbers 308065 381479 CBS, 307832 306190 Heating • Air "Conditioning 765•HOU8ATONIC AVENUE BRIDGEPORT, CONN 06604 203)333-1906 FAX: (203)334-1247 y MUNICIPALITY i JOB NAME STARTING DATE JOB NAMEzoo JOB DESCRIPTION f PER PUBLIC 'ACT 91-95 , THIS LETTER AUTHORIZES L.".4 TO SIGN THE PERMIT AS AN AGENT OF -CUSTOM AIR SYSTEMS, C FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED JOB AND MUNICIPALITY. APPLICABLE •LICENSE 1 6 OH ANNA -SR S-1 026 6 J CARLOS LARRACUENTE I 4 f Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 860-648-2006 December 19, 2000 Allphase Roofing and Remodeling Exterior Design Specialists, Inc. Talaga Bros. Dave Miller Construction Newsom Construction Rancourt Construction Design Works Re: Woodbridge Roofing Leaks Chase Orchards Subdivision Lot's 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37and 38 Dear Contractor: Regretfully I am sending you this correspondence. We each have suffered much disappointment and loss with our involvement at Chase Orchards. Prior to the outset of the Gerber Construction lawsuit and ultimate foreclosure by Glastonbury Bank and Trust, we shared a healthy business relationship. Unfortunately when a project is siphoned for what has now reached almost $1,000,000.00 it is impossible to overcome the demise that has occurred. This correspondence is sent as notice to all parties concerned in this matter as a single correspondence to avoid multiple letters concerning the same subject. In that vain, this correspondence relates individual as well as collective lots referenced above of which you may or may not have performed work at. Specifically at this time, I am aware roofing leaks are occurring at lots 5, 9, 22, 27, and 34. The Problem: A roofing leak has occurred at five of the eleven Woodbridge homes that were built at Chase Orchards. The construction requires a valley (cricket) be framed over the garage where the garage roof meets the second floor sidewall of the bedroom that is located over the dining room of the Woodbridge model. When this problem was originally discovered, Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling inspected the eleven homes and reported to me that in his opinion the leaking is being caused by the valley that was not properly framed with a cricket which would shed the water away from the sidewall and therefore prevent any leaking from occurring. Chase Orchards, LLC Opinion: After the inspection and ensuing discussion, I originally concurred with the opinion of Angelo D'Leo, however after further consideration and inspection of the valleys with others, I believe improper roofing and flashing installation is causing the leaks. Page 2, Woodbridge leaks The installation of the roofing by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling in the valley area included 15 lb. felt paper installed under the roofing and Ice and Water that was installed under the IKO Architectural shingles in the valley. Standard step flashing was installed along the sidewall and around the corner of the front corner post were it meets the valley. The problem that occurs is leaking in heavy rains and/or during freezing temperatures. Firstly when heavy rain is experienced, the water is unable to move past the corner post quickly enough without backing up against the corner of the house. This backing up is causing the water to seep over the step flashing and into the house. Secondly, when freezing temperatures are prevalent, rain and snow forms into an ice dam that again works its way over the step flashing and into the interior sidewall. In addition the ice dam backs up in the valley and works its way under the roofing shingles, and leaks through the valley. Conclusion (see drawings enclosed): 15 lb. felt paper should first be applied over the roof sheathing. Ice and water should be installed under the valley and be installed in a continuous method up the sidewall and the front wall where the wall meets the corner post. Ice and water should extend at least 36" beyond the open side of the valley. Seams should be tarred to insure sealing. At the corner post, if necessary additional Ice and Water should be installed to ensure a tight seal at that point. This requires careful installation of the Ice and Water to ensure a solid seal. Step flashing should be installed in a reverse method so as to extend higher on the sidewall. This would require additional or double courses) to be installed with each course of the roofing shingles. Roofing should then be installed and the valley shingles should be sealed (tarred) on each course. It is our opinion, if the above method of installation was used, there would not be any leaking on Woodbridge models. Mr. D'leo disagrees, and claims the valleys installed by the framing contractors are improperly constructed and that new crickets need to be installed to prevent the leaking. Allphase Roofing and Remodeling was hired as a professional experienced in the residential roofing business. It was expected they would use that experience and proper installation methods to ensure a quality job that would not leak. The method of installation by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling did not provide that installation and in our opinion they are responsible to make corrections to any and/or all Woodbridge models. Mr. Adebola H. Owodunni the owner of Lot 5 has notified Chase Orchards, LLC that his roof is leaking. He has obtained an estimate from Barnett Construction Co. (copy enclosed) to make these repairs. I am informed, he is not contracting with Barnett to make these repairs, but is entering into an agreement with Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling to make the repairs at a lesser cost. It is Mr. Owodunni's position that he will have the work repaired and file a suit to recover the cost of repairs from Chase Orchards, LLC. Chase Orchards, LLC will implead all parties concerned in this matter if that occurs. We do anticipate a conclusion would result in responsibility to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling. John J. Doran Chase Orchards, LLC Cc/ John Collins, Building Inspector Town of South Windsor Terrance Zehnder, State of CT, Dept of Consumer Protection Bola Owudunni CONT RIDGE VENT ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES 54 TOP OF PLATE UCT CHASE OMFINCLO. VENTED SOFFIT I•- FIN.FLR SIDINGc • , ir t FIN FLR. FRONT ELEVATION Ntar r ARCHITECTI wlNosc PI 19t0'-0•21'-0• 20F0 r-w d r Wo 4'-4• Wo 4'-r e•-0• 4'- lc:D17 2-r4r 13'-41/r b Ip a 0' 4 0• r o• BEDROOM 2 N 2-7-r- n n o THE"DRAW REPRODU ti g MASTER BEDROOM to WITHOUT 1M DaB10N Vr h 7 8' C a7 LA r-r 2.7- ASSOC 7.4•7.a. b g 2033 EL SOUTH Wi irrn I?W Lc BEDROOMS hI 2.7-W N 7-e• 11.1• a'-o• ti' r4l 1/r r-r r-r W RC- 10 OPEN TO BONUS RM, BEDR 4 FOYER Q MICROLM4 LVL MICROIAM lVL Ir WIf y C or Mr Pei{. O r eo 4'-0• h 0 W_ RE-ENGINEERED ATTIC TRUSS 24'O1C V it N J(K b e V ll N Y 6 ar t 3'-0' 4'-0• 0- e'-o• s•Io• s•-+- 4--0• 4•-0• 3.-0- To 3--e- sro j1/ 2d00 11:40 8606684822 ARNET7 CONST C- Page No. of rages BARNETT CONSTRUCTION CO. 5022 127 SPENCER ST SUFFIELD,CT 06078 1-860-669-4822 LIC.#640-085 it DATE F OSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE oLq owoo I /z/ fJn W6574,Y44 dleQ O s JOB NAME 7"rL CQ tzl u (2-D F i 0 CITY, TE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION a cam- C~t" 4 6 ARCHITECT DATE OF"KS JOB PHONE We hereby suhmn apedt"ione am eWanatea for- Lel d.--(2 - r., _'l •Ala—a-.^ u use I W r ern V n n r herebyto furnish mated I and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications,for the sum of Uv d011arb($ Payment to blniaclo as Allows' FOR ACCOUNTS OVER 30 DAYS 1 Alt%PER MONTH.18%PER ANNUM I Al,matey I.a guaranteed to be w cified. I 10 be corfrn ad in a workmanlike manner ord-ngto standard practi S Any a n or deviation above specifications Avthonzed invol•nng extra costs will be execUted only upon written orders,and will become an extra 51gnalwe_—LdaL cnirge Ovb"anC above the esnmate All agreem6ntS Conlingeni upon strikes,accidents or I delays Deyono our controi Owner to carry fire,tornado and Other necessary Insurance Our I is pr wfthlnworkersarefullycoveredbyWorkmen's Compensation Insurance.withdrawn by ttnot oeeptad d'yg r S*NATUREArrEpInreillF1`opos The above prices,specifications and condrtions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted You are authorized to do the work as apecrtied Payment will Do made as outlined above I;IDATE OF ACCEPTANCE- Ionn..r ..n n,nnnn•nr .i. nnww.n.nn Ion DEC 1'00 12:44 8606684822 PAGE.002 Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 February 14, 2001 Allphase Roofing and Remodeling CERTIFIED MAIL 3 Enfield Street Windsor Locks, CT 06096 Re: Chase Orchards Roofing Woodbridge Models Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38 Dear Angelo: Recently you made repairs to the roof at lot# 5 at Chase Orchards to stop the leaking that was occurring. I have inspected the work that you completed with an independent roofing contractor and it appears the work has been completed satisfactorily. In our previous discussion after my letter to you of 12-10-00, you indicated it would be necessary to install a cricket to correct the leaking that was occurring. You further indicated that the reason the roofs were leaking was because crickets were not installed by the framing contractors and if they had been the original roof installations could have be done correctly and the roofs would not have leaked. When you made the corrections to lot# 5 you did not install the crickets you insisted were needed. Per my previous correspondence to you dated 12-10-00 1 disagreed with you position regarding the crickets and provided a written as well as a plan illustration of the method that should have been used to install the roofing correctly. My independent roofing contractor Mr. Leonard Barrett has confirmed my position regarding the crickets you claimed should have been installed and of the installation method I provided to you It appears you applied that method to correct the leaking at lot# 5. You stated in a telephone message to me after receipt of my 12-10-00 correspondence that we did nct provide sufficient materials for the correct installation. As you are aware, our agreement for your services provided that we supply all materials except nails for the installation. Part of those materials was Ice and Water Shield You stated in your message that we did not supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the valleys. May I remind you your workmen were not limited in quantity to the materials that were ordered by us for roof installation. We relied on you as a professional roofer experience in proper roofing application. We in fact did supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the roofing at all homes in Chase Orchards, however if you or your workmen indicated additional Ice and Water Shield was necessary for the Woodbridge models, it would have been supplied to you as it had on numerous occasions when your men indicated you were short materials. There remain eleven additional Woodbridge models at Chase Orchards, some continue to leak. I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Barrett's estimate to make the repairs to these eleven homes. I would like to give you the opportunity to make the repairs. Please contact the homeowners Page 2, Allphase listed on the enclosed ASAP to determine if any leaking is occurring and make repairs to homes that are leaking. Additionally the roof leaks have caused damage to the drywall and paint in several of the houses. I believe your insurance would cover the cost of those repairs and would request you contact them for inspection of the repairs that are necessary. You may want to make the repairs with your own workmen and I would agree if you were inclined to do so. These homeowners have been very patience in this matter and I would hope you would act expeditiously to make these corrections so as to not inconvenience them further. Thank you, John J. Doran, Member Chase Orchards, LLC Cc/ Glenn Terk John Collins Terry Zenhder Erin & Mary Cole Bolla & Saundra Owodunni Scott & Laura Snyder John & Pam Valente Frank & Jewel Amoruso Charles & Sandra Graves Steve & Susan Suprenant Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri Jack & Susan Archambeault Carl & Beth Bishopric Jim & Kathryn Elder Wally & Ranke Orsamolu Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 February 14, 2001 Re: Chase Orchards Roofing Woodbridge Models Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38 Dear Chase Orchards Homeowner: As you are aware, some buyers of Woodbridge model homes have experienced leaking between the sidewall of the upstairs front bedroom/study into the garage and sometimes basement area. We have worked diligently to have these repairs made by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling and I am hopeful they will make the repairs to other homes as they have to lot# 5. If the repairs are not made within 30 days receipt of my letter to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling copy enclosed), Chase Orchards will file small claims action against Allphase Roofing and Remodeling for each home that has a leaking roof, and will have the repairs made by Mr. Barrett. Thank you, John J. Doran, Member Chase Orchards, LLC Chase Orchards Homeowners: Lot# 4 Erin & Mary Cole 648-2714 Lot# 9 Scott & Laura Snyder 648-9097 Lot# 22 John & Pam Valente 644-2270 Lot# 26 Charles & Sandra Graves 648-9661 Lot# 27 Frank & Jewel Amoruso 644-2392 Lot# 30 Steve & Susan Suprenant 648-0034 Lot# 31 Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri 648-4032 Lot# 34 Jack & Susan Archambeault 285-5117 Jack work Lot# 36 Carl & Beth Bishopric 648-4686 Lot# 37 Jim & Kathryn Elder 648-4406 Lot# 38 Wally & Ranke Orsamolu 648-4481