HomeMy WebLinkAbout180 Pheasant WayElectrE:# APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
Plumbing# 10436P 18 0 PHEASANT WAY
Dat Ap,,Zi P-3o ,cqq5HVAC # JZ5 6'n 14(0%ot 0-16) No, 26039
Sprinkler#
tlmQt Sf
Building 1-C--E COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee aS lr, —
Engineering D f TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee $ 5
Affidavit SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE
Appr.for CO. t f i S Total Fee 75 7 -
TO BUALDM DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Additional Cost) —
The undersigned h reby applies to do work according to the following specifications:
n
Jo6 Location Lot No. Side of Street W Zone Rl-
Applicant C Tel.# p Q noun
Address 3 D Zip Lic.#
Owner S a,vy..x Address
Architect sa Address
Sq. Ft.New Area: 1st FI. / Gl SJ 2nd FI. /q? 5 3rd Fl. Total New Area JS ci C7
Rooms Lavatories U Bathrooms Garages --
Purpose of this permit: Ne 1N -4)U SQ
Ci Wat K Well Septic System Sew
Ins. H.O. P. Cert. Area SS Basem nt 1507 Garage 725
Approved 6y Dat Use Group `{ Construction Type 69
ReAed 1197
I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of
South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans r specifications of the Building for which this
permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be I the proper i tan fr m all street lines,side yard lines,and required
distances from all other zones and is located in whic this buil ' g a is flowed.
Signed
I hereby apply for a Certificate of Oc for t rk n his application for the permit.
Signed
DO NIT RITE BELO THIS LINE
INSPECTION COMMENTS
Location of job AFFIDAVIT Additional Fee
State of Connecticut
ss.
County of Hartford
m Owner
I .. . . . . . . . . . . HAs . . . . . . . . . .. .of .C 4 S.t"for building erected under
onto
Permit No. . . . ??3 1. . . . . .. . . . . . . . issued by the Dep't of Building of the Zbwn of South Windsor being duly sworn,make oath
and say that the actual cost of the completed work authorized under said permit was . . . ..''. .... .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
Subscribed and swor`n,to before me this . . . . . day of . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. A.D.19 . . . . .
EsEimate Cost:$ D-3(0(kod
i
Difference: $ Notary Public.
Inspection / Approval Date By Appl
Code Description Due Whom Code Comment
99-26039-B 214,000
BO1 FOOTING 06/17/99 DCJ A
B02 FOUNDATION 06/24/99 JFF D NOT READY RECHECK 062599
B02 FOUNDATION 06/25/99 JFF A
B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 08/13/99 DCJ D WEB STIFFENERS, FLANGE CUT IN TJI, LATERAL
BRACING OF TRUSSES, DRAFTSTOP DUCT CHASE
E03 ROUGH 08/13/99 DCJ A
P03 ROUGH 08/13/99 DCJ A
PO4 GAS TEST 08/13/99 DCJ A LEFT STICKER
H03 ROUGH 08/13/99 DCJ A
E01 SERVICE 08/18/99 DCJ A RELEASED TO N.U.
B04 INSULATION 08/18/99 DCJ A LTR NEEDED FROM ENG. RE: CUT OUT OF TJI
B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 08/18/99 DCJ A
99-10558-H 9,000
99-10435-P 7,800
99-16372-E 6,000
Total Est Value 236,800
Dwelling 3,555 145,470.60
Basement 1,587 19,678.80
Garage 725 8,990.00
Smoke Det 7 525.00
BOCA Value 197,370.77
Difference 39,429.23) n
i
SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
180 PHEASANT WAY LOT ##37 Reviewed By En eerin g
CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed o T Denied
2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By P anning)
BP_#_26039_ Ph_#_(860) 648-2006 Date Reviewed pprov /Denied
Date Submitted 05/13/99 FO"Co
As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of
Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and
approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include:
y
Approved Denied N/A
1. Approved building permit plan
2. Finish grading per approved
building permit plan
3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs,
dumpsters, required parking
4. Utility location;
a. sanitary sewer/septic system
b. foundation drain
c. electrical & telephone
d. water
e. other
5. Sewer connection charge paid OV'Ak5
6. Appropriate certification
7. Bonding
8. Planning & Zoning/
Inland Wetlands Considerations
Sewer Permit No. U`19
Pavement Excavation No.
COMMENTS:
f
C
ox
jo
CT 8 1999
SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT.
9.180 PHEASANT WAY LOT_#37 Reviewed By FE:V-"A En ineering)
CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed Approved nied
2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By anning)
BP_#_26039 Ph_#_(860) 648-2006 Date Reviewe Approve Denied
Date Submitted 04/30/99 FOR BUIL N P
15-h13 )aftInaccordancewiththeZoningand/ Subdivision Regulations, prior to the
building of any structure on a lot, a Topographic Plot Plan shall be submitted
for approval. The minimum requirements shall include:
Approved Denied N/A
1. Name, address & phone number of owner/applicant
2. Name, address & phone number of plan preparer
3 . Zoning Information - i.e. zone, open space,
floodway, etc.
4. Plot Plan at 1" = 40' scale
a. Subdivision reference, abutting properties, etc
b. Easements of record
C. Lot description, bearings, building lines,
distances, area, etc.
d. Contours, existing & proposed, 1 or 2 ft.
interval where appropriate
e. Building location with dimensions.
Elevations of proposed finish floor, garage
floor & centerline of road at driveway
f. Elevations of gravity drainage systems, sanitary
foundation drain at the house and the street
g. Tentative utility location (gas, water,
electric, septic system, etc.)
h. Title block with name and address of preparer,
date, appropriate certification, live seal and live
signature consistent with the Board of Registration
requirements. (P.E. & L.S.)
5. Sedimentation and erosion control
6. Special Planning & Zoning, Inland/Wetlands
considerations (Plans on file w/Town Clerk)
COMMENTS: 11 1$
O
MAY 1 3 1999
sm w
Es.
DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT
P)2T7",Z
Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permi #
APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE lm%
644-2511 ext.230
Date ding Inspector
r
iZ)id( Inspector Application must be printed or typed
Location ofjob
ITO Ao fewol Alvcl 97
Street No.Ufreet Lot No.
T
Street I
FEE SCHEDULE
FloorFloor Apt.No.
0 - $1,000 - $12.00 FOver $1,000
12.00 per$1,000 OWNER (f
or any fraction thereof
ADDRESS
V
OWNERS PHONE# fIg'—dCO 67
APPLICANT
Sf ADDRESS
0*.N
roll
ESTIMATED COST$ mad.ad
0
L/IS THIS A CONTRACT COST?
1A YES NO
FEE ENCLOSED $
R-Co TYPE OF JOB:
Original Installation
Alteration/Addition Repair
Revised 11/95
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT(Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF BUILDING
IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (!ES / NO
BUSINESS
ASSEMBLY CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY soa, ,c, r C 7
MERCANTILE
EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY
INSTITUTIONAL
FACTORY
STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE
GARAGE
MIXED USE ADDRESS
CITY STATE ZIP
Other please specify)
TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD
SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED 4110 .Se"cJ g.•
NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS
NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED?YES NO
NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS `0
NUMBER OF SWITCHES60 NUMBER OF OUTLETS 60
NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES 41
NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS ` NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS
SEPERATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
4
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS
TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
Gina eS
NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE GNATURE OF APPLICANT
PHONE NO. 7l DATE 7
T 7177 4.d "v774r' , -S .x• 7-7 5 p. .try t r , - f-, ,x _ •'
z.-4SYECIM DATE<6-N!j TIME
LOCATION C_ -7
INSPECTION: CODE: RESULT(D/A) :
BUILDING:
ELECTRICAL:
z
r PLUMBING:
E HVAC:
OTHER:
i
DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT z 3s
Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit
APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE
644-2511 ext.230
Date uilding Inspector Application must be printed or typed
Location ofjob
180 Pheasant Way Lot#37
Street No. Street Lot No.
FEE SCHEDULE
Floor Apt.No.
0 - $1,000 - $12.00
Over $1,000
12.00 per$1,000 OWNER Chase Associates, Inc/.
or any fraction thereof
ADDRESS 2033 Ellington Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
OWNERS PHONE# 648-2006
APPLICANT Frank Mauri
OWN SR. ADDRESS 29 Bissell Street
East Hartford, CT 06108
Cn ESTMATED COST$ 7800.00
O
IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? x
YES NO
l FEE ENCLOSED 96.00
TYPE OF JOB:OR-CO x Original Installation
Alteration/Addition/Repair
Revised 10/96
APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT(Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION YES / NO
RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY
ASSEMBLY
MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY single dwelling
EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTION
FACTORY ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE
STORAGE
GARAGE ADDRESS
MIXED USE
CITY STATE ZIP
Other please specify)
TYPE OF INSTALLATION original SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN 4"
NO. OF TOILETS 4 STYLE siphon NO. OF URINALS STYLE
NO. OF BATHTUBS 3 NO. OF SHOWERS 1 NO. OF LAVATORIES 5
NO. OF CONDUCTORS SIZE NO. OF STACKS 1 SIZE 3
AREA OF ROOF NO. OF CATCH BASINS NO. OF FLOOR DRAINS
NO. OF OTHER FIXTURES 1_KIND
ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TOO R AIR BY A WINDOW YES/N"
SIZE OF WINDOW 3 x 3 IF NONE C.F.M. OF VENTILATOR
SIZE OF DUCTS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK sewer
SIZE OF WATER MAIN 1" SIZE OF WATER PIPING&RISER 3f4 & 1/2
WATER BEATER
TYPE gas MANUFACTURE American
TANKS SAFETY DEVICES
TEMPERATURE
CAPACITY_Sp RELIEF VALVE 100XL
TEST PRESSURE 300 WORKING PRESSURE 150 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE 100XL
TYPE MANUFACTURER
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Complete plumbing for new single dwelling
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS
TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH W
1
2013'4 P-1
NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
PHONE NO. 289-9511 DATE 7/29/99
DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT
Application is hereby: TOWN of SCUM WRMSOR
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
y" APPRO 1540 SUUJVAN AVENUE
r LL=
644-2511 ext.230
Date Building Inspector
4 ,
o
w"A` '
dui 3±•a'+r`^X -.fv'aY=iacJ:.yf;t W#T:>_'„Y@'-"'f "
Street SueCt
FEE SCHEDULE
Yv_`v "'z`
y..- •"=
s ,'' r.,
Floor"y zWr_
0 - $1,000 - $12.00
Over 1,000r=;; _e.
12.00 r$1000 k n = .zq Xrrs .OWNER
or any fraction thereof
ADDRESS 0 k
w
OWNERS mOl\ri# ~• " r 4'`:,"; .vcs, „F ,. - ..a r'ki; "F' ,c."
a?
4g„e T i-r.ii i i-! •I.:Yin r i.•iti+rirri s` -:;Y y ''''`,-az". N:-
f 'ms? ,•. >.
APPLICANT tt
O ADDRESS
ESTIMATED COSTS
O •
Iw•••YwY1S1rV
A! .' t - ..r%
Y _.
IS THIS A CONTRACT COST?
S
FEE ENCLOSEDS l l3 ,
As TYPE OF JOBo ;o
Original Installation x
Alterflan Addition ftair E` 'na`'r .:,rat a}1+f y'•.-
a z pper,.
W+ter.
s`.^
gip.
APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT (Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF SYSTEM TYPE OF BUILDING
HEATING RESIDENTIAL
A/C COMMERCIAL
VENTILATION INDUSTRIAL
HEATING
STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS.HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS.
HYDRONIC WARM AIR__y UNIT RADIANT HEATER
EXISTING RADIATION ADDITIONAL RADIATION TOTAL RADIATION
DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE_0 F INSIDE2(_F DIFFERENCEe-7 OF
TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH) e 0 p O 0
HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION)
DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.)
6
GROSS HEATING CAPACITY (INPUT-BTUH) SaG NET RATING (OUTPUT-BTUH) /off 9a a
TYPE OF FUEL
OIL-GPM GAS-INPU" &o u 0 ELECTRIC-KW
OIL TANK SIZE&LOCATION
INSIDE OUTSIDE CAPACITY LPG TANK CAPACITY
AIR CONDITIONING
DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE ?0 F INSIDEZS:_F DIFFERENCEZtil F
TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH)_el,,pac 0
HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION)
DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.)
IjEA-110Ko Co
TONNAGE COOLING CAPACITY(BTUH) 'd 10
VENTILATION
DESCRIBE ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUST EQUIPMENT)
TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM(CFM) FRESH AIR INTAKE(CFM)
PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION)
FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO
COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
STATE LICENSE-NO.NAME&TYPE NA OF APPLICANT
PHONE NO. d,.S' 3 G DATE
f
L ;---nn,_x b j ecti sae G ui d,:-- to I nsta1 I ati on C ompar•i son
T+l"• •1 ly,rP i +1 il.T rf,)V rf, '. %i,:`I(:``•1 7C /r 1' T•f•T+f+rl` )T•+1` .7'. 1/i1 •` :k iA. '2(}t(i. f •A j` if' 'i i !a it :f.ri:,1 I, T +5••1%7.T:
LOGIC Software Group
L.Wnno x InclustriI-- ) j-,.
0a11 ,:-g s , Tx.
10/06/ 9c; LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 1
1—o T ##•9
1 (_ `_ t q y1
I A R R L E j r.'/F..I'
It—r,j Tri lf'El'N. Tj_IhyE : (_c:; .Er F
lj61M -R TN IEEE ?a 11 9P1ER OUTSIDE90
I L_V TFMF'ER^,TL.1I E RAN(a(' INC')ICAT R P'1
P- N rN(--' Rf.1.ATIV. 111.1MIP,ITtr'' 4 _.
F,,F E NC R r"H L..A T I TJ.1 I^,L•.
a,TN-r r, AIR HAN L-S PL. r, r1(7,!R'
F;rlt;q I F `•,i`1I L
A L R - 4 I NC H r;'•r•T F' 1='c I (
Iry I i 1 C)''ti 1 AC) I ,, L,F.. i'.'.r l E 1. 1? i;L kh) E) F R M F 1 Nei . r, i ,
1 ,`•t T r f: T( f.1 I-{ _'`.,I ?'1•,.: `1'P /' ( _ 1"i I_ (-
r P CI L Y j 'y 1=i 4 0 0 1 2
i R D w c I•l .!I N r 1- F j_ ( t` )
1 T'r N 3 'j ,FM
I h1 r'11 Pi !r•J C I_ T(:r T l ;,r. i; r F:1 fa i .I B L.E r; I(''',1
iI. 1O " '. 1N P'(IihT-• j 121
II
w
I0/0 6/1 ir, LOT 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 2
Ih!nr,E)FR7 D F..
AIN
EiC)Jh9 - ' I: IT H'Pt :LiE % E i X
W A L_I- R !4 I N C II E T R f• 01 +,,
is+i' l._(.! ; i f='1 '•w L,f'. i Lw ;a. M E T A L. F A'.:,T rJ r -
TINT -'I'lNTEU HA1)1NG C'RAP Er C.)R, F',L_Tt'•!r)r
IHA0IN', C`nEr I- L('IENT 1
WINDOW A i_.'r,116 L. E F',';N E CLR, G I..A, :' -kh)" CID F R M F A C I N G - N
T T I`I T - F T IIT I~'D H r,O T NG "-f RAP F. H A.1..1=
H^.:_; T r C: rr 1 C J:F:r T _ ! : VEAL. i 0
F=I.,R 1 + iA,'C,I rr".'F VTN'rI. F L_'a'r R + N
r v
t t Nr ; T N w 11. T f,' a.T:l i` I c:F M
Ih9hlf Ft TNF 11. 1`P: F.T I 4 F1 9 IE'L_F '.,^•I
MF: N 1 1 VF(N r _L z• F l f=I4 j(aIi
PEC,PL. E I_I''..1 E,L f, r. 18 C(Q
PPLT NC E .• 1 rin,
r; I.I;.T L.C, iM I!I_ T 10 G,,A:I N 1'91_(l_ T .1 (1 I i ?I,j I)
1 4 <:'9 1 5 7 ^0
ri r I!) t I I
RAI- L i .' 3 R 1 '1 C, S ()
r !111''1 S ,I I P-
T
I ! ; t+tip a(;'r' iA I I I I'r. I' 14
r T I tiI I' 1.17(`.I
i A L I I !•_ r i r", , , "( I••I i^ i ,`(," j,' j'' ,I +Y+ I , i i I ..
01
L is ,4 N Y I. FI,r1 i;i;;' + i',I(1 r r,I
t+•ITNTIf-f: J
M r I'Y7'r` l g LI1c
I Y^;ICI
LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 3
T 0
TA L P
4 4 ' 065ENST" L F
IF N T
R()C)M — 4 LIVINC;T
W A L L 1 1 /2 4 1 E X T P IN,L.Y 3 2
NC' W 3 D01.12-1I—C PANE C11-R GLA."` WOOD FRM F A,", f N G— 30 -1 190 4 `3
T 1 rd'1 1-11%)1 C C H,AP 1 N G--D F/'-..PF u H,"",[ 'F (')F'AWI--1
4WP,i L I N r'H F Y'l P PC,-1.,
ri N
F L C,i NY!- F L CJ C,NC-1 TN 44
7 T C f" Ir.,i F -1 .T F:A TIZI N
T F
L, 'T' N J
P L N I B
tr A
f N F1 U 10 4 14
T T
N I C L
C) L
f N11 T P I
D R
W I N'r E,'-,' 1:N F 11, Tr T U)N'
1-1 OrINrILI''F.' F M E N"I B L
I'E N T
1 1 B L A T NPEC1PLEEN 600'
LATENT G A,I N 460 L
APPLIAN('Ec' 1200
D UCI T C,c":'. M L.T 10 G Al N M U LT I'll 0 286 270
1O/O/QO LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 4
qO0DBRlp6[
L T #g
AREA RTUH GTU|
q FT LOSS GAIm
TDTAI R0OM 5 1 , rmO 'CU FT 1810
SEN9Tf-"iIF 3 ` 1 2 2 , 870
A.TE NT 1 , D 4 63 L
R M O DEN ] N Z0M[ 'I
WALL 12J3 R- 1 19 + /2 OR ]/4 INCH EXTR POLY 58 20g 54
0VERHANC, 1 . 0
WZM OW A OOURLE P NE CLR 5LA WO D F R M FA[ ING-S 9O 1 , 18O 75
T71"N7 -TINTE HALF PRAWN
H 0TMG C0EFFICZENT = 1
FLOO 19A HARD-VOOU OR VINYL FLO0R + NO INS 143 1 , SU8 O
WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 1 ` 612
SUMMEP INFILTRATION 29 rFM SFNSIBLE GAIN 80
LATENT IN 830 L
PEDPLF 8ENSI8LE AIM 1200
ATEMT GAIN 920 L
APPLIAN?E 1200
nUCT MULT ' ' 1O AIN MULT= . 1O 402 341
TDTAL F, f I G 1 , 14 4 CU FT 43
SEM3IBL 51079 31750
LATENT 1 , 750 i
RO0M - 7 BATH I# -ONE' 1 7 »-ONE'
FLD0R 19A vZMYL FL00k + NO IM8 029 O
WINT[R TNFTLTRA M U CFM O
UMMER T FILrRATI'v/ O FN SEWSIBLE I
LATEWT GAlN O L
PE PLE 1 gENSI8LE GA IN 300
LATENT GAI 2' cl L
DUCT L S MULT = . 1O 6 IN MULT J 30
TOTAL F R R M 7 4 jB CU F7 5R
S WSIGL[ O02 O
LATENT 230 L
RDOM - 8 M J Z0NE 2 18 X 17
kq ALL 1 ?J3 R - 8 " 1 /? nR 3/4 INCH E X T R P0LY 98 356 ' 92
0V[KH JG
10/06/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 5
A.R I,`A B T])H B T 1,11 F!
I N
N 5 54 clLF1_4 Wr,,rD FRM F Ar INwINDl_)w 00UB1 L f N
1 1.0 P-\A P E H,,LF f.')RAMNTIN'F TINTED I .1\DJNG -
WA L L 1 -1 IR - 19 + 1 /2 0 IR ';'/'4 1 N S 11 E X-1-F. PlDIL 'Y 4 0 12 6
CEILING 16 DARX R - '10 III 1.,ATION 394
W I N TE k J'N f T.F.I T I k:''N 4 1
1 I_ F T I C.)N'N1 N1 I- I N F N:)
T NT N 1 2 4 L
61)nPEOPLEN'." _f C3 LF "I ea"11`41
11 N T k 1'N 6(1 1
r 77 47
fjTOTAL. F P F:\' I II FT
LATENT 1 7 6 L
0 9 E,/',Tii I N 1,J r X 9
1. 1 -2-i .3 F 1 9 + -1 /2 0 R. 3 4 INCIH EXT'r". PO Y V-3 6 490
tj
M E C H AN I
DUCT L M L 1- 10 G,4,I N M IJ L T,;-. 0 113 3 3
1 6 8 F T 17
legsSI
LAT ENT 04 5 L
3/4 EXTF,' PIDLY 1214AL2.,13 F,,.- 1 9 21 C,P
V
f
i
LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 6
A.RF,''.6T1.1H T U H
N,1,I F-T L!1 14,.A,Ih•!
W I N 171 f I.1 R I. F 4 T.•J! ': I. I 1:,l," J'I r , F F n( F R5
h.1"'.T 0
T
1 9 0 360
TIP-,!T_.-T:1:NT n H4 INQ-0R a.PE HALF
A LL 19 2) R 3/4 INCH E'XTR F' LY 346 89
n/1.L{( R " .30 IN . 111_ATION 0 57n 309
WIP,iTF F; I N'" J L TrR,A,`I I tN' 0 1" M 1
IIhji''j1- F: TNF 1:1. TR, TI N q FH C:N - I 1 r a ".TPj s30
LA.Tr 47' A,TIC 1130 L
l
111'"7 F ! fl :;!,,.T,rJ ti1 I I L 7' - . 1 0 41 19 s;
7 I T A L :'I F; r:l:l l::l l' 1 01 , 0 :I_I F r, ri
RI 4' 'FF NT 1 , 2c,0 L
WALL I ^ 1 ':3 R 19 1/2 '?Rl 3 4 INC,H E X T R PO Y r'4 u'66 60
T N C?I,I;d 3 i'. 01^I 1,1 C,L F P A N S C- L R :L A 3 1 1''o o F'R h1 ( A.(.;I,I i; i) 1 , 1 9 0 4 7
TIN.T , TJ.NT cIIADJNG DRAF'Er HALF DRAWN
HAC,IN; 10EI-F= F('IENT 'I
FTLTNI:; 16G ARK F: _ : 0 J LATJi;'N I }: 371 201
1.%IINTEI.' INF"II- TR,,.TI()N 0 I Fill 1 , 6 1 2
40C;
L,'\ T E N T ,,''A. t N U n L
LA7 EN T CIAIN 460 L
D C I C.T i •_1!. T 9 ; h, :J N h4 111.. T 1 C 4 b I
T C,T.,Al L. F ::1 R F:rl,f)Tj 1 'I 1 . 2 4 8 Ll F T
EN IELE 3 , 783 2 , 007
LATENT 1 , 290 L
R C'IM,M - 1 2 F. . R 4 f N 0P,I L 1 X 1 3
WALL 1 ;yl3 R - 19 R 3/4 IN H E X T R POLY 8 209 54
Imo)t,r
F I',u I'l L R ;1 0 FR M F";;C T N G 3 0 1 190 475
TINT 7 r;,!7 f,D HAL'JN , -DR/, PE . H1°,I P,".,la,,rtN'
OtMwp
10 /0(-1/196 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 7
L T #9
RC," ii 1--i rIJH
C A J'NFT
17 45WALL12-i 3 R. -- 1 4, 1 4 1" H x T R, f" Y
III-A. 10 N
W I N R NI TL T RA 1 (.1--4
UMMER 480
cl L
00LSLCI'NpEpLE
LATE N I'A I P11 460 L
OUCT j 1.I 1_T 0 GAIN MULT-= 0 184
Tj')TA[ F(..)F Rl.-, M 12 i 414 14 ,
021
1. T F N'T 9 0 1
I I x 2
14 E X T 1 263 6 e
W R I..A'-" '01 C C, F r.".M F,A 1 N
I," T E N T
T N(:#I t, Xk1iAL
W A L L 1 7.
0
1j, I N t'H E A T
F,
A p v R - 3 f1 T N T ION
F 1._n r)F., I N'Y L, F t -in RN 1 N 41'' 2 1 F': 0
WINTER I N T 1-T RA I -.[ C"'N
U M M E f" I N f I L T RA-T DG'N M I Ir-L f-" J.,PJ 4 0
L A T E r-J'F (I AT P.) 415 1.-
PFOF'L E Erg S,1 1.. E A.1r<< 1200
i',IT N 0 L
DU,""T M N M U I T' 10 29
f ")I' L 9 6 C 11 F-1 14
LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 8
E
T 9
T F.11 f-T 11 F E- TO,Tr, 1.S FT
I b L F D 2'
LATCNT 4 0 50 L
2ximurl", I ty I1 -4 p.---I(--; I -
i
R'i r j-)t
19 ly", of Total L o.9-d
V =z i 92 -1 4(*,R
L o r c)ni r)1,j t t i n t,v r o d u ce H he rp r o c.e u r sThiinririd
fi -9 n d f t h i n d i t it i n C n n t i c t c r f A me,1 7, W'9- it 1-1 a 1
f I Z,1-,;7,1-1 ll p 0 J tit
I tion
k,lk
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
860-648-2006
December 19, 2000
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling
Exterior Design Specialists, Inc.
Talaga Bros.
Dave Miller Construction
Newsom Construction
Ranc,ourt Construction
Design Works
Re: Woodbridge Roofing Leaks
Chase Orchards Subdivision
Lot's 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, Wand 38
Dear Contractor:
Regretfully I am sending you this correspondence. We each have suffered much
disappointment and loss with our involvement at Chase Orchards. Prior to the outset of the
Gerber Construction lawsuit and ultimate foreclosure by Glastonbury Bank and Trust, we shared
a healthy business relationship. Unfortunately when a project is siphoned for what has now
reached almost $1,000,000.00 it is impossible to overcome the demise that has occurred.
This correspondence is sent as notice to all parties concerned in this matter as a single
correspondence to avoid multiple letters concerning the same subject. In that vain, this
correspondence relates individual as well as collective lots referenced above of which you may
or may not have performed work at. Specifically at this time, I am aware roofing leaks are
occurring at lots 5, 9, 22, 27, and 34.
The Problem:
A roofing leak has occurred at five of the eleven Woodbridge homes that were built at Chase
Orchards. The construction requires a valley (cricket) be framed over the garage where the
garage roof meets the second floor sidewall of the bedroom that is located over the dining room
of the Woodbridge model. When this problem was originally discovered, Angelo D'Leo of
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling inspected the eleven homes and reported to me that in his
opinion the leaking is being caused by the valley that was not properly framed with a cricket
which would shed the water away from the sidewall and therefore prevent any leaking from
occurring.
Chase Orchards, LLC Opinion:
After the inspection and ensuing discussion, I originally concurred with the opinion of Angelo
D'Leo, however after further consideration and inspection of the valleys with others, I believe
improper roofing and flashing installation is causing the leaks.
Page 2, Woodbridge leaks
The installation of the roofing by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling in the valley area included
15 lb. felt paper installed under the roofing and Ice and Water that was installed under the IKO
Architectural shingles in the valley. Standard step flashing was installed along the sidewall and
around the corner of the front corner post were it meets the valley.
The problem that occurs is leaking in heavy rains and/or during freezing temperatures. Firstly
when heavy rain is experienced, the water is unable to move past the corner post quickly
enough without backing up against the corner of the house. This backing up is causing the
water to seep over the step flashing and into the house. Secondly, when freezing temperatures
are prevalent, rain and snow forms into an ice dam that again works its way over the step
flashing and into the interior sidewall. In addition the ice dam backs up in the valley and works
its way under the roofing shingles, and leaks through the valley.
Conclusion (see drawings enclosed):
15 lb. felt paper should first be applied over the roof sheathing. Ice and water should be installed
under the valley and be installed in a continuous method up the sidewall and the front wall
where the wall meets the corner post. Ice and water should extend at least 36" beyond the open
side of the valley. Seams should be tarred to insure sealing. At the corner post, if necessary
additional Ice and Water should be installed to ensure a tight seal at that point. This requires
careful installation of the Ice and Water to ensure a solid seal. Step flashing should be installed
in a reverse method so as to extend higher on the sidewall. This would require additional or
double courses) to be installed with each course of the roofing shingles. Roofing should then
be installed and the valley shingles should be sealed (tarred) on each course.
It is our opinion, if the above method of installation was used, there would not be any leaking on
Woodbridge models. Mr. D'leo disagrees, and claims the valleys installed by the framing
contractors are improperly constructed and that new crickets need to be installed to prevent the
leaking. Allphase Roofing and Remodeling was hired as a professional experienced in the
residential roofing business. It was expected they would use that experience and proper
installation methods to ensure a quality job that would not leak. The method of installation by
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling did not provide that installation and in our opinion they are
responsible to make corrections to any and/or all Woodbridge models.
Mr. Adebola H. Owodunni the owner of Lot 5 has notified Chase Orchards, LLC that his roof is
leaking. He has obtained an estimate from Barnett Construction Co. (copy enclosed) to make
these repairs. I am informed, he is not contracting with Barnett to make these repairs, but is
entering into an agreement with Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling to make the
repairs at a lesser cost. It is Mr. Owodunni's position that he will have the work repaired and file
a suit to recover the cost of repairs from Chase Orchards, LLC. Chase Orchards, LLC will
implead all parties concerned in this matter if that occurs. We do anticipate a conclusion would
result in responsibility to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling.
John J. Doran
Chase Orchards, LLC
Cc/ John Collins, Building Inspector Town of South Windsor
Terrance Zehnder, State of CT, Dept of Consumer Protection
Bola Owudunni
c11 i 2d00 11:40 8606684822 BARNETT CONST
Page No. of rages
BARNETT CONSTRUCTION CO. 5022
127 SPENCER S7
SUFFIEW,CT ON78
1-86v-668-4822
UC.#UM85
I
ii P OSAI SUe"17TED TO wow; DATE
S f J06 NAME
CrTY, TE MID ZIP CODe
JOB LOCATION
ji,AjX C-T- 0(oo-74- L&V-kMY6 5: 46 dwAeMW
DATE OF PLANS
JOB PHONARCNRECTE
Wa herby submrt spe it"ione ano estlrnatea for:
IN
u-
r. ..... is
rr n p n r hereby to furnish materi I and labor complete in accordance with above specifications,for the Sum ot:
dollars( y
Payment to b1macle As-follows:
i FOFj ACCOUNTS OVER 30 DAY6 IA%PER MONTH,18%PER ANNUM
Al,meter I is guaranteed to be ea ofied. I to be oom lOd In a workmanlike 11
manner, Ord n9 to Standard practi s hortkedAnyalnordeationmabovespecifrcattons5gnetureinvolvingextraCostswillbeCXOCUtedonlyuponwrittenorders,atxl will beCOmQ an BztrB
cr.1(94 over anC above the estimate All agreemeMS Contingent upon strikes,accidents or
oelays oeyona our control.Owner to carry fire,tornado anC other neceasary insurance Our t
1tno1'00qPtedw1ftVhtln
be asys
workers are fully covered t)y Workmen's Compensabon Insurance.withdrawn by
fi 1 S*NATURE
C1LtQ If2iYCCP Df !`Ci}IIIH —The above prices,specrkations and
j condMonS are satisfactory and are hereby accepted You are authorized to do theworkasapectfiedPaymentwIItgmadeasoutlinedabove
510NATUME
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE.
ion
n .n ...n .,nnnr.n . nnww.n.nn
DEC ^ 1 i00 12:44 8606684822 PAGE.002
ARCHITECTURAL
CONT RIDGE VENT
TOP OF PLATE
ILA
RN CLO CONT.
VENTED SOFFrT
SIDING TO SLMIFIN.FLR.
FIN CL40
iii -_- iii iii =_ 11 _== -__
oll u u lioFINFLFt
FRONT ELEVATION
rARCHITECTL
sa'-
0•
wIMDSt
21'
4r
PC
2174r
r
d
E-
0.
4.
4-
4'-
0•
4'-
r
T•(
r
4'-
W
2•
r-
rlc:
D
13*
4
llr
10
a
e-
0'
U
4-
0'
E-
0'
BEDROOM
2
N
Q
b
THESE
DRAW
MASTER
BEDROOM
is
REIRODu
v
1ArtTH
uT
rr
p
DESIGN
M
t+
b
7•
7-0'
LE(
W
2-
7-
0r
C
r-0-
2-
7-
af4
ASSOC
A
7-
ram•
b
2033
EL
SOUTH
Wl
W
i
W
Lc
Ll
1
BEDROOM
3
19tv
74r
T
b
A.
y-
r-
0,
rr
r-
r
b
W
BEDR
4
OPEN
TO
BONUS
RM
ru-1
I
Q
I
FOYER
p
MICROLAMLVL
0-
MICROLAM
LVL
4'-
r
T-
T
4'-
W
T-0
o
o
m
fob
A{
o
11
b
p
4
O
hV4
4'
4r
uj
PRE-
ENGINEERED
ATTIC
TRUSS
24'
OIC
V
it
M
S1
1
Ip
c
J
a.
b
r .
I
v4f'
4
t
v
1.•-
l
s
I
i
1
3'-
0'
4'-
0'
a-
0.
V-
X
s•-
a-
s.,
o
4'-
0'
4-
0
3•-
0'
6'-
0'
3'-
0'
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
February 14, 2001
Re: Chase Orchards Roofing
Woodbridge Models
Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38
Dear Chase Orchards Homeowner:
As you are aware, some buyers of Woodbridge model homes have experienced leaking
between the sidewall of the upstairs front bedroom/study into the garage and sometimes
basement area. We have worked diligently to have these repairs made by Allphase Roofing and
Remodeling and I am hopeful they will make the repairs to other homes as they have to lot# 5. If
the repairs are not made within 30 days receipt of my letter to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling
copy enclosed), Chase Orchards will file small claims action against Allphase Roofing and
Remodeling for each home that has a leaking roof, and will have the repairs made by Mr.
Barrett.
Thank you,
John J. Doran, Member
Chase Orchards, LLC
Chase Orchards Homeowners:
Lot# 4 Erin & Mary Cole 648-2714
Lot# 9 Scott & Laura Snyder 648-9097
Lot# 22 John & Pam Valente 644-2270
Lot# 26 Charles & Sandra Graves 648-9661
Lot# 27 Frank & Jewel Amoruso 644-2392
Lot# 30 Steve & Susan Suprenant 648-0034
Lot# 31 Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri 648-4032
Lot# 34 Jack & Susan Archambeault 285-5117 Jack work
Lot# 36 Carl & Beth Bishopric 648-4686
Lot# 37 Jim & Kathryn Elder 648-4406
Lot# 38 Wally & Ranke Orsamolu 648-4481
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
February 14, 2001
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling CERTIFIED MAIL
3 Enfield Street
Windsor Locks, CT 06096
Re: Chase Orchards Roofing
Woodbridge Models
Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38
Dear Angelo:
Recently you made repairs to the roof at lot# 5 at Chase Orchards to stop the leaking that was
occurring. I have inspected the work that you completed with an independent roofing contractor
and it appears the work has been completed satisfactorily. In our previous discussion after my
letter to you of 12-10-00, you indicated it would be necessary to install a cricket to correct the
leaking that was occurring. You further indicated that the reason the roofs were leaking was
because crickets were not installed by the framing contractors and if they had been the original
roof installations could have be done correctly and the roofs would not have leaked. When you
made the corrections to lot# 5 you did not install the crickets you insisted were needed. Per my
previous correspondence to you dated 12-10-00 1 disagreed with you position regarding the
crickets and provided a written- as well as a plan illustration of the method that should have been
used to install the roofing correctly. My independent roofing contractor Mr. Leonard Barrett has
confirmed my position regarding the crickets you claimed should have been installed and of the
installation method I provided to you. It appears you applied that method to correct the leaking
at lot# 5.
You stated in a telephone message to me after receipt of my 12-10-00 correspondence that we
did not provide sufficient materials for the correct installation. As you are aware, our agreement
for your services provided that we supply all materials except nails for the installation. Part of
those materials was Ice and Water Shield You stated in your message that we did not supply a
sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the valleys. May I remind you your
workmen were not limited in quantity to the materials that were ordered by us for roof
installation. We relied on you as a professional roofer experience in proper roofing application.
We in fact did supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the roofing
at all homes in Chase Orchards, however if you or your workmen indicated additional Ice and
Water Shield was necessary for the Woodbridge models, it would have been supplied to you as
it had on numerous occasions when your men indicated you were short materials.
There remain eleven additional Woodbridge models at Chase Orchards, some continue to leak.
I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Barrett's estimate to make the repairs to these eleven homes. I
would like to give you the opportunity to make the repairs. Please contact the homeowners
Page 2, Allphase
listed on the enclosed ASAP to determine if any leaking is occurring and make repairs to homes
that are leaking. Additionally the roof leaks have caused damage to the drywall and paint in
several of the houses. I believe your insurance would cover the cost of those repairs and
would request you contact them for inspection of the repairs that are necessary. You may want
to make the repairs with your own workmen and l would agree if you were inclined to do so.
These homeowners have been very patience in this matter and I would hope you would act
expeditiously to make these corrections so as to not inconvenience them further.
Thank you,
John J. Doran, Member
Chase Orchards, LLC
Cc/
Glenn Terk
John Collins
Terry Zenhder
Erin & Mary Cole
Bolla & Saundra Owodunni
Scott & Laura Snyder
John & Pam Valente
Frank & Jewel Amoruso
Charles & Sandra Graves
Steve & Susan Suprenant
Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri
Jack & Susan Archambeault
Carl & Beth Bishopric
Jim & Kathryn Elder
Wally & Ranke Orsamolu