The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About179 Trumble LaneElectric#I&a L 3 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# 6 3 94 9,179 TRUMBULL LANE HVAC #D "l mi-E Date: A&I92 No. 25939 Sprinkl r# FINAL APPR VALS Estimated Cost $ -ZA o" Building rLZ lN n& COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee Engineering k TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee $ S Affidavit 2 3 ? SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE Appr.for CO. Z 3 4 N S Total Fee TO BUILDW,I)PARTMBvf,TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,Cr Additional Cost) $ —a— The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications: Jo6 Location n iZ It Lo, ' Lot No. ! Side of Street Zone Applicant rj s L- L Tel# gtO 2 0z)-( Address 2-0 3 3 C-1 Zip 6-C 6 ZY Lic.# Own r Address Architect !Z Address Sq.Ft.N w Area: 1st Fl. 2nd FL `I(o 3rd FL Total New Area '-c5Go> Rooms Lavatories Bathrooms Garages S— Purpose of this permit: AL0 L6t%A City Water pL ell Septic System Sewer Ins. H.O. S.P. Cert. Area :3&5 9 Basement 1 Garage 8-38 Approved by cS U—Date LfRf 5cl Use Group Construction Type 5-LS Revised 1197 I h reby agree to conform to all the requirements ofthe Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be I ted t proper ' tan m all street lines,side yard lines,and required distances from all other zones and is located in whic t s b I ing and lowed. Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of O nc for th rk i this application for the permit. Signed DON RITE BEL W THIS LINE INSPECTION COMMENTS Location of job AFFIDAVIT Additional Fee —0— State of Connecticut SS. County of Hartford of s2}S'C IG t4S actor for building eeccted under Permit Na 25939 issued by the Dept of Building of the 7bwn of South Windsor being duly sworn,make oath and say that the actual cost of the completed work authorized under said permit was$240 r 000. 00Si vSubscribedandsworntobeforemethis . ... . .. ............. day of A.D.19 EsGmate Cost:t 240 r 000.00 0Difference: t otary Public v Inspection / Approval Date By Appl Code Description Due Whom Code Comment 99-25939-B 218,000 B01 FOOTING 04/09/99 JFF A WITH CONTRACTOR B02 FOUNDATION 04/19/99 DCJ A B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 05/17/99 DCJ A E03 ROUGH 05/17/99 DCJ A E01 SERVICE 05/17/99 DCJ A RELEASED TO N.U. P03 ROUGH 05/17/99 DCJ A H03 ROUGH 05/17/99 DCJ A B04 INSULATION 05/19/99 DCJ A HEAT DUCT TO BE DRAFT STOPPED PO4 GAS TEST 05/20/99 DCJ A LEFT STICKER PO4 GAS TEST 05/21/99 DCJ A LEFT STICKER 99-10478-H 9,000 99-10384-P 8,000 99-16263-E 5,000 Total Est Value 240,000 Dwelling 3,659 149,726.28 Basement 1,574 19,517.60 Garage 838 10,391.20 Smoke Det 7 525.00 BOCA Value 203,580.89 Difference 36,419.11) SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNEC.TICUT 179 TRUMBULL LANE LOT_#26 Reviewed By J. Fe A eering) CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed of Apprftft-oved enied 2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By anning) BP_#_25939_ Ph_#_(860) 648-2006 Date Reviewe -7 pproveDenied Date Submitted 04/06/99 FO C of O ** As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: Approved Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan 3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking 4. Utility location; a. sanitary sewer/septic system b. foundation drain C. electrical & telephone d. water y e. other Cc'As UZ 5. Sewer connection charge paid Ljjkpjl1 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding 8. Planning & Zoning/ Inland Wetlands Considerations Sewer Permit No. 0 I Pavement Excavation No. COMMENTS: C,(y -OU-C Or - IA STAW> 'V- - SSW. UA-T. Gt,s Zo 7/ 9r*Gk .oN APE, A•.x> s-•I T R.ci + d' l!= - r (on c.QwtiG(Z Q tvl (fsC t D v4 PA fL RECCE' FRosi a outs . rJUL 2 11999 mmwam v ENG.DEPT. SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 179 TRUMBULL LANE LOT_#26 Reviewed By -:5• ?SgQA En ineering) CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed Approved enied 2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By anning) BP_#_25939 Ph_##_(860) 648-2006 Date Review Approv /Denied Date Submitted 04/06/99 FOR BUI ING PE In accordance with the Zoning and/or Subdivision Regulations, prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a Topographic Plot Plan shall be submitted for approval. The minimum requirements shall include: r Approved Denied N/A 1. Name, address & phone number of owner/applicant 2. Name, address & phone number of plan preparer 3. Zoning Information - i.e. zone, open space, floodway, etc. 4. Plot Plan at 1" = X' scale tz a. Subdivision reference, abutting properties, etc b. Easements of record c. Lot description, bearings, building lines, distances, area, etc. d. Contours, existing & proposed, 1 or 2 ft. interval where appropriate e. Building location with dimensions. Elevations of proposed finish floor, garage floor & centerline of road at driveway f. Elevations of gravity drainage systems, sanitary foundation drain at the house and the street g. Tentative utility location (gas, water, electric, septic system, etc.) h. Title block with name and address of preparer, date, appropriate certification, live seal and live signature consistent with the Board of Registration requirements. (P.E. & L.S.) 5. Sedimentation and erosion control 6. Special Planning & Zoning, Inland/Wetlands considerations (Plans on file w/Town Clerk) COMMENTS 11 12 L----ATc1> .J pWvE-"n 1 MA =aEZtJI CAN'T 1K 1o1 -t •'''ciL . t d APR 61999 w cp smwmw PEZDEPARTMENTDECISIONAPPLICATIONFORELECTRICALPERMITA'(,3 Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg PerMit# 31540SULLIVANAVENUE 1 , 911 APPROVE 644-2511 ext.230 11 ale IdingLUnspectorgn Application must be printed or typed Location ofjob zz Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Fo Over $1,000 12.00 per$1,000 OWNER 575 6 r any fraction thereofF0, ADDRESS dd33 Ci/2 f 1 OWNERS PHONE APPLICANT ADDRESS< a/ arc/ ESTIMATED COST e!5 Cf6 C ;,: 0 IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? YES NO FEE ENCLOSED $ OR Cow7 OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Addition Repair Revised 11/95 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION NO BUSINESS ASSEMBLY CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY MERCANTILE EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY INSTITUTIONAL FACTORY STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE GARAGE MIXED USE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WRUNG METHOD `"1 LC /'rn c SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS_ NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS L C& NUMBER OF PANELS_ REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED?YES NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS AR NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES S C NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPERATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE JIGNATURE OF APP ICANT PHONE NO. DATE NMI fry INSPECTOR \ cC7 DATE TIME wn LOCATION 1Z INSPECTION: CODE: RESULT(D/A) : 5—i3? / 5o3BUILDING: jECT PLUMBING: A HVAC: i4 o 3 J OTHER: i DEPARTMENT DECISION gAPPLICATIONFORPLUMBINGPERMIT Application is hereby:TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit APPRO 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE W4 d4q— 644-2511 ext. 230 6E Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed Location ofjob 1 79 TRIIMBI-11-1, T-ANE 96 Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULEF] Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Over $1,000 12.00 per$1,000 F or any fraction thereof OWNER mAsp, ASSOCIATES, TNC, ADDRESS 20-,1--i PT,r,TNc-,ToN ROADLSQT"H WINDSORx r-T 06074 OWNERS PHONE# 860 648-2006 APPLICANT FRANK mAiTRT OADDRESS 2q RTS.RPT.T. STREET EAST HARTEMDO Or 06108 tjj ESTMIATED COST$ 0 IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? x YES NO j wC FEE ENCLOSED OR•Co TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Addition Repair Revised 10/96 APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION YES / NO RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCYASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY SINGLE DWELLINGEDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION FACTORY ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE STORAGE GARAGE ADDRESS MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION ORIGINAL SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN 41, NO. OF TOILETS 4 STYLE SIPHON NO. OF URINALS STYLE NO. OF BATHTUBS_3 NO. OF SHOWERS 1` NO. OF LAVATORIES6 NO. OF CONDUCTORS SIZE NO. OF STACKS_SIZE AREA OF ROOF NO. OF CATCH BASINS NO. OF FLOOR DRAINS NO. OF OTHER FIXTURES_ 1 KIND WHIRLPOOL ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY A WINDOW YES/I SIZE OF WINDOW3 X 3 IF NONE C.F.M. OF VENTILATOR SIZE OF DUCTS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK SIZE OF WATER MAIN SIZE OF WATER PIPING&RISER /4 1/2 WATER HEATER TYPE MANUFACTURE AMERICAN TANKS SAFETY DEVICES TEMPERATURE CAPACITY SC) RELIEF VALVE I C)nXL TEST PRESSURE m WORKING PRESSURE i rn PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE I GnxT. TYPE MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETE PT.TTMRINC, FM NEW SING--E FAMITY THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WO . L &A,t NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIG OF APPLICANT PHONE N0289-9511 DATE 3 1 PEDEPARTMENTDECISIONAPPLICATIONFORHVACPERMIT14 Application is hereby:TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Pe # APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE a 644-2511 ext.230 Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed Loca 'on ofjob Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. 0 - $1,000 - $12.00 Over $1,000 12.00 per$1,000 OWNER S d or any fraction thereof ADDRESS Gd G T- Cl 2 — OWNERS PHONE# y "- A D i a APPLICANT S' /O Ile OWN $t ADDRESS 8P1 C'- o G=L U Uj ESTIMATED COST $ D O 6 IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? S NO FEE ENCLOSED $ y SOR Cow TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation 3 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 11/95 APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT(Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF SYSTEM TYPE OF BUILDING HEATING RESIDENTIAL A/C C_ COMMERCIAL VENTILATION INDUSTRIAL HEATING STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS.HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HYDRONIC WARM AIR UNIT RADIANT HEATER EXISTING RADIATION ADDITIONAL RADIATION TOTAL RADIATION DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE_f F INSIDE 7,,7-F DIFFERENCE-7-7- F TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH) HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) GROSS HEATING CAPACITY (INPUT-BTUHY o.a NET RATING (OUTPUT-BTUH)/SO 0 O TYPE OF FUEL OIL-GPM GAS-INPUII33 Od 0 ELECTRIC-KW OIL TANK SIZE&LOCATION INSIDE OUTSIDE CAPACITY LPG TANK CAPACITY AIR CONDITIONING C DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE,F INSIDU e F DIFFERENCV TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH) Me o 0 HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) TONNAGE_ COOLING CAPACITY(BTUH) v VENTILATION DESCRIBE ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUST EQUIPMENT) TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM(CFMOd FRESH AIR INTAKE(CFM) c PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN. BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. 0 5e- P-/ STATE LICENSE-NO. NAME&TYPE l OFIGNAAPPLICANT PHONE NO. a2 y S) ,fS& 1 ' l ennox Objective Guide to S nstal lati on Comparison LOGIC Software Group Lennox Indus,tri es Inc . Dallas , TX 1 -800-527 --3506 Y y`...,,^epp26.'!^',`.;.; Ly,". ;" ,,I , l ..r v 'ivy ix°•'•''.; t,rrEy,.x•n'nlea rs•;- =i" , `y `' r,l';:r.fir, _ y„?', :', .....i f. ,; , hh'R..J.n 1. ,j..,•: rY:• 4 .:", a."iy,. ,;':[L.. .,.•..F,_ _ v. w`dies£,,. b ,4e Rye-,•y ` t s-°t 0t06/..9.64 } L,OGI 1,OQ.1` 1 SIb+ENT n L` ,LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 1 rv.'¢;lf.14 tip, tk'r`e•i?. wr .,;:..+.,,i.af[' p i.-wt'.n •';:+'.;_ Fu-.. .r, . M f,.G" ik'" ,,;t x- Y}r "t" 'v'h s j"nf{' d..uq,+l.=.., o->5;;`r"'f,+•[l,.'f.. ,.i•'' j t 4„ •.'X',,.`j Y;Y Cyr•', 'a ' l i .. ,`,fo-".., i,;' t k '" 1 o T ' PREPARED .,FOR,* DORAN , PREPARED BY : LARRIE MEYER /' C . A. S . FILE TITLE : DORAN2 DESIGN TEMPERATURE:: (DEGREES F ) MINTER INSIDE 72 WINTER OUTSIDE 0 SUMMER INSIDE 75 SUMMER OUTSIDE 90 DAILY TEMPERATURE RANGE , INDICATOR M DESIGN GRAINS RELATIVE HUMIDITY, 42 DEGREES NORTH LATITUDE 41 SUMMER AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 1 . 0 WINTER AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 0 . 7 AREA BTUH BTUH SQ FT LOSS GAIN ROOM 1 FAMILY ROOM IN ZONE -I 19 X 17 WALL 12j3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 .INCH EXTR POLY 107 385 100 WINDOW . 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 45 11785 540 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 WALL 1 2'.J:3 R-- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 136 490 126 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 289 31246 0 WINTER INFILTRATION 31 CFM 21418 SUMMER INFILTRATION 44 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 720 LATENT GAIN 11246 L t PEOPLE fi ' 'SENSIBLE GAIN 1 800 i 1r4 LATENT GAIN 1380 L ' e e r r b DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 832 329 TOTAL FOR ROOM 1 2 , 584 CU FT '" `.., - 23 SENSIBLE 9,.,156, .6.14 Iy.,, 71174 10/06/96 LOGIC.'1060*'`RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 2 WOODBRIDGE LOT `#9 AREA BTUH BTUH SQ FT LOSS GAIN ROOM - 2 KITCHEN IN ZONE 1 26 X 13 WALL, 12J3 . R- 19 + 1 /2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 163 587 152 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 DOOR 80 SLDNG DR , 2 PN CLR GLASS 'METAL FACING-N 36 11879 396 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES OR BLINDS SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 9 357 108 TINT-TINTED , SHADING--DRAPES HALF (RAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 REVEAL = 1 . 0 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR ' VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 338 31796 0 LINTER INFILTRATION' 31 CFM 21418 SUMMER INFILTRATION 44 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 720 LATENT GAIN 11246 L MECHANICAL VENTILATION 50 . 0 CFM 31960 825 PEOPLE 6 SENSIBLE GAIN 1800 LATENT GAIN 1380 L APPLIANCES 1200 DUCT LOSS MULT 10 GAIN MIJLT= . 10 11300 520 TOTAL FOR ROOM 2 21704 CU FT 338 SENSIBLE 141'297 51720 LATENT 41054 L ROOM - 3 DINING ROOM IN ZONE 1 13' X 15 FALL 12'J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 8G 310 80 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 tA1INDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE. CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 18 714 216 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT w 1 WALL 12'J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH' EXTR POLY 120 432 112 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 FLOOR 1 0A HARDWOOD OR VINYL, FLOOR + NO INS 195 2 , 100 0 WINTER INFIL0RATION 12 CFM ' 967 31.1MMER INFILTRATION 17 CFM SENSIBLE GAIP4 288 LATENT GAIN 498 L r PEOPLE 6 SENSIBLE GAIN 1800 LATENT GAIN 1380 L APPLIANCES x' DIICWT L.OS S MULT ti . 1 0 GAIN MULT= . 1 Q 4'G'1 .; _,7 Q° 111 10/06/96 LOGIC 1000 'RESIDENTIAL 'LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 3 WOODBRIDGE LOT 49 AREA B,TUH B,TUH SQ? FT LOSS GAIN TOTAL FOR ROOM 3 1 1560 'CU FT 1 95 SENSIBLE 6 , 074 41065 LATENT 1 , 878 L ROOM - 4 LIVING ROOM IN ZONE 1 14 X 13 WALL 1 2•.J3 R-19' + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 82 295 76 OVERHANG. = 1 . 0 WINDOW 3A ' DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 30 11190 475 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 WALL 12•-13 R- 19 + 1/2 nR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 120 432 112 0VE"HANG = 1 , 0 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR' + NO- INS 182 2 , 044 0 WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 11612 SUMMER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 480 LATENT GAIN 830 L PEOPLE 6 SENSIBLE GAIN 1800 LATENT GAIN 1380 L APPLIANCES 1200 DUCT LOSS MULT=z . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 557 414 TOTAL FOR ROOM 4 11456 CU FT 182 SENSIBLE 61131 49557 LATENT 2 , 210 L ROOM - 5 FOYER IN 70NE 8 X 20 WA,L l_ J ? R - 19 11 ;, CIF. 3/1+ 1 1i "XTF, !='I.Y 1 15 30 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 WINDOW A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING--3 14 555 238 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING 'COEFFICIENT = 1 DOOR 10H PANEL' '& WOOD STORM 18 467 121 WINTER INFILVATION 22 CFM 1 , 7 19 SUMMER INFILTRATION 31 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN ' 512 LATENT GAIN 886 L PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LATENT GAIN 460 L APPLIANCES a =fa`e. , 1°2`00, DUCT LOSS MULTI- . 1 0 GAIN MULT= . .1 0 286 270 , F _i^ , .,.Y.• '}-., '_d,,T.l 11.,rta,p"-:n$:'"cs n ilc i.,,. _ 10/06/96 LOGIC 100(l 'RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 4 WOODB'RIDGE 1QT #•9 AREA BTUH - STUH SQ FT LOSS.'GAIN TOTAL FOR ROOM 5 11280 CU FT 160 SENSIBLE 31142 21970 LATENT 11346 L ROOM — 6 DEN IN ZONE 1 11 X 13 MALL 1 2J 3 R— 1 9 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 58 209 54 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING—S 30 11190 475 TINT—TINTED SHADING—DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT w 1 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 143 11606 0 WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 11612 SUMMER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 480 LATENT GAIN 830 L PEOPLE 4 SENSIBLE GAIN 1200 LATENT GAIN 920 L APPLIANCE.:E'_73, 1200 DUCT LOSS MULT- . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 462 341 TOTAL FOR ROOM 6 1 , 144 CU FT 143 SENSIBLE 51079 39750 LATENT 19750 L ROOM — 7 BATH IN ZONE 1 7 X 8 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR. VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 56 629 0 WINTER INFILTRATION 0 CFM 0 SUMMER INFILTRATION 0 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 0 LATENT GAIN 0 L PEOPLE 1 SEN SIBLF GAIN 300 i LATENT GAIN 230 L • DUCT LOSS MOLT= . 10 GAIN MULT= , 10 63 30 r TOTAL FC)R ROOM 7 448 CU FT 56 SENSIBLE 692 330 LATENT'230 L: ROOM — 6 M . B . R . IN ZONE 2 1'8 X 17 WALL"1.2 J 3 R 1,, + 1/2 CAR.. 3/4' INCH .x r a?:LY 9 9 ` 3 5`5 9 2 y, `, 7 t....: Kw4 k`aiq;yd,•_"rs`"i-s{ `, t J "O Ws•. .!"li,-Y+""'"'"': Z'h-"+li,l7'^Rtr. '.l 'q 10/06/96 LOGIC 1,000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 5 WOODBRIDGE LOT #9 AREA BTUH BTUH SQ, FT LOSS GAIN WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING•-N 45 11785 540 TINT-TINTED' SHADINGI-QRAPES' HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 WALL 12J3 R'-;Ig + 1/2-,OR ' 3%4', lNCH` EXTR POLY 136 490 126 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 CEILING . 1.6.G ' ' DARK'' R-30 INSULATION 306 727 394 WINTER INFILTRATION 31 CFM 21418 SUMMER INFILTRATION 44 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 720 LATENT GAIN 11246 L PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LA'FENT t;AIN• 460 L DUCT LOSS MULT-- . 10 GAIN MULT= . 1 0 578 247 TOTAL FOR ROOM 8 21448 CU FT 306 SENSIBLE 61354 21719 LATENT 11706 L ROOM -M . B-ATH IN ,.ZONE'. .2 .- :":,,, r , 1`9 ;X 9 Nit'. WALL '` 12J3 R`1'9.>'+ °1/.2°' OR 4. INCH 5X'TR POLY 136 490 126 OV* '2 H fAN' R'= 1 . 0 t WINDOW . . 3A . .'DOUZLS'q;PANE' C R., G°hASS WOOQ FRM FACING-N 16 635 192 TIf T.-TINTED'"'` SH'ADING-D PAP ES HALF DRAWN WHAD"I' N'G'ACOEFFICIENT w 1 CFII.. ING 16G DARK . R-30 INSULATION 171 406 220 WINTER TNFTI-TRATION 11 CFM 950 SUMMER INFILTRATION 1'6 CFM SFN'SIE,I. F (-iATN 256 LA'FENT Q'iAIN 443 1 MECHANICAL \,'I.NTILATION 75 . 0 CFM 5 ; C340 1 , 2)36 PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LATENT GAIN 460 L DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10' 833 263 TOTAL FOR ROOM 9 11368 CU FT 171 SENSIBLE 91163 21895 LATENT 3 , 045 L ROOM -- 10 B . R . 2 IN ZONE 2 20'`'`'X` 12 y WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 130 68 { .'12 1':' OVERHANG = 1 . 0 10/06/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 6 WOODBRIDGE LOT #9 AREA BTUH BTUH SQ -FT LOSS GAIN WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 30 11190 360 TINT—TINTED` SHADING—DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT w 1 WALL 1121J3 R--19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 96 346 89 OVERHANG, = 110 C:EILIN I . 16G DARK R-30 INSULATION 240 570 309 WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 11612 SUMMER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 480 LATENT GAIN 830 L PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LATENT GAIN 460 L DUCT LOSS MULT= : 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 419 196 TOTAL FOR ROOM 10 11920 CU FT 240 SENSIBLE 41604 21155 LATENT 19290 L ROOM — 11 B . R . 3 IN ZONE 2 13 X 12 WALL 12,13 R- 19 +• 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 74 266 69 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 wINDt_JW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING—S 30 1 , 190 475 TINT—TINTED SHADINGS—DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 CEILING 16G DARK R-30 INSULATION 156 371 201 WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 11612 SUMMER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 460 LATENT GAIN 830 L PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LATENT GAIN 460 L DUCT LOSS MUL:T= . 1 0 GAIN MULT= . .10 344 182 TOTAL FOR ROOM 11 1 , 248 Cl_I FT 156 SENSIBLE 31783 21007 . LATENT 11290 L r ROOM — 12 B . R . 4 IN ZONE 2 11 x 13 WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 58 209." 54_ OVERHANG — 1 . 0 WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING..S 80` ~ J 19 1`0 TINT—TINTED SHADING—DRAPES . HALF DRAWN t" a a 10/06/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 7 WOODBRIDGE LOT #9 AREA BTUH B.TUH SQ FT LOSS GAIN SHADING COEFFICIENT 1 r WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1 /2 , OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 48 173 45 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 CEILING 16G ,DARK R-30 INSULATION 143 340 184 WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 1 , 612 SS-1-1MMFR INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 480 LATENT GAIN 830 L PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600 LATENT GAIN 460 L OUCT LOSS Mljl-T= , 1 0 GAIN MULT= , 1 0 352 184 TOTAL FOR R,''lOM 12 11144 CU FT- 143 ' SENSIBLE 31876 21021 LATENT 11290 L ROOM - 13 BONDS ROOM IN ?ONE 3 11 X 22 WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 73 263 68 OVERHANG = 1 , 0 WINDOW 3A DC)UBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 15 595 238 TINT-TINTED SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN SHADING COEFFI.CIENT = 1 MALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 128 461 119 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 WALL 12j3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 126 461 119 OVERHANG = 1 . 0 CEILING 16G DARK R--30 INSULATION 242 575 311 FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL. FLOOR + NO INS 242 2 , 718 0 MINTER INFILTRATION 10 CFM 806 SUMMER' INFILTRATION 15 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 240 LATENT GAIN 415 L PEOPLE, 4 SENSIBLE GAIN 1200 LATENT' GAIN 920 L DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MOLT= . 10 588 229 ' TOTAL FOR ROOM 13 1 '1936 CU FT 242 r SENSIBLE 61466 21524 LATENT 1 , 335 L • f u{, ;.'{: u:,f'.r"'.ii,}ra ! N u x't '+-. r 3zi•w t , r q LOG I 1004 S ILIENTIA.L LOADS ANAL Y: I : PAGE ti 1_I CT N _ J1 M".1, F f , , I I i i I'' .I ,' I .i 'iiti,'7' -I ,' I Y; I II i ,, i •,I i 'i' y ' ;' ,. '4 ? ;s• r ,, y ;;7 r.w K '' "a •: k '' <'i `4: >k do ,4;`:. ? s ; '• ' •>,y y, it k .d k• r' I I,! .-i I , r I. (:ijlllll I (~I `^',• - (•"Ciil( •- i i,l i" ii - "is ,tea- ;1{i — •. V I - .1` L .i i i I 1 ! i I ', i ', f 1 I 1-j (r r f„i j I ;•1` I I,l "l IL -, 1 I >t I' Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 860-648-2006 December 19, 2000 Allphase Roofing and Remodeling Exterior Design Specialists, Inc. Talaga Bros. Dave Miller Construction Newsom Construction Rancourt Construction Design Works Re: Woodbridge Roofing Leaks Chase Orchards Subdivision Lot's 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37and 38 Dear Contractor: Regretfully I am sending you this correspondence. We each have suffered much disappointment and loss with our involvement at Chase Orchards. Prior to the outset of the Gerber Construction lawsuit and ultimate foreclosure by Glastonbury Bank and Trust, we shared a healthy business relationship. Unfortunately when a project is siphoned for what has now reached almost $1,000,000.00 it is impossible to overcome the demise that has occurred. This correspondence is sent as notice to all parties concerned in this matter as a single correspondence to avoid multiple letters concerning the same subject. In that vain, this correspondence relates individual as well as collective lots referenced above of which you may or may not have performed work at. Specifically at this time, I am aware roofing leaks are occurring at lots 5, 9, 22, 27, and 34. The Problem: A roofing leak has occurred at five of the eleven Woodbridge homes that were built at Chase Orchards. The construction requires a valley (cricket) be framed over the garage where the garage roof meets the second floor sidewall of the bedroom that is located over the dining roomoftheWoodbridgemodel. When this problem was originally discovered, Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling inspected the eleven homes and reported to me that in his opinion the leaking is being caused by the valley that was not properly framed with a cricket which would shed the water away from the sidewall and therefore prevent any leaking from occurring. Chase Orchards, LLC Opinion: After the inspection and ensuing discussion, I originally concurred with the opinion of Angelo D'Leo, however after further consideration and inspection of the valleys with others, I believe improper roofing and flashing installation is causing the leaks. Page 2, Woodbridge leaks The installation of the roofing by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling in the valley area included 15 lb. felt paper installed under the roofing and Ice and Water that was installed under the IKO Architectural shingles in the valley. Standard step flashing was installed along the sidewall and around the corner of the front corner post were it meets the valley. The problem that occurs is leaking in heavy rains and/or during freezing temperatures. Firstly when heavy rain is experienced, the water is unable to move past the corner post quickly enough without backing up against the corner of the house. This backing up is causing the water to seep over the step flashing and into the house. Secondly, when freezing temperatures are prevalent, rain and snow forms into an ice dam that again works its way over the step flashing and into the interior sidewall. In addition the ice dam backs up in the valley and works its way under the roofing shingles, and leaks through the valley. Conclusion (see drawings enclosed): 15 lb. felt paper should first be applied over the roof sheathing. Ice and water should be installed under the valley and be installed in a continuous method up the sidewall and the front wall where the wall meets the corner post. Ice and water should extend at least 36" beyond the open side of the valley. Seams should be tarred to insure sealing. At the corner post, if necessary additional Ice and Water should be installed to ensure a tight seal at that point. This requires careful installation of the Ice and Water to ensure a solid seal. Step flashing should be installed in a reverse method so as to extend higher on the sidewall. This would require additional or double courses) to be installed with each course of the roofing shingles. Roofing should then be installed and the valley shingles should be sealed (tarred) on each course. It is our opinion, if the above method of installation was used, there would not be any leaking on Woodbridge models. Mr. D'leo disagrees, and claims the valleys installed by the framing contractors are improperly constructed and that new crickets need to be installed to prevent the leaking. Allphase Roofing and Remodeling was hired as a professional experienced in the residential roofing business. It was expected they would use that experience and proper installation methods to ensure a quality job that would not leak. The method of installation by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling did not provide that installation and in our opinion they are responsible to make corrections to any and/or all Woodbridge models. Mr. Adebola H. Owodunni the owner of Lot 5 has notified Chase Orchards, LLC that his roof is leaking. He has obtained an estimate from Barnett Construction Co. (copy enclosed) to make these repairs. I am informed, he is not contracting with Barnett to make these repairs, but is entering into an agreement with Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling to make the repairs at a lesser cost. It is Mr. Owodunni's position that he will have the work repaired and file a suit to recover the cost of repairs from Chase Orchards, LLC. Chase Orchards, LLC will implead all parties concerned in this matter if that occurs. We do anticipate a conclusion would result in responsibility to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling. John J. Doran Chase Orchards, LLC Cc/ John Collins, Building Inspector Town of South Windsor Terrance Zehnder, State of CT, Dept of Consumer Protection Bola Owudunni CONT RIDGE VENT CHITECTURAL SHINGLES TOP oF PLATE FIN CLO 30= VENTED SOFFIT FIN.FLR. SIDINWG TO O lul FIN.FLRL lop 4 FRONT ELEVATION a LW ARCHMECTL se•-0- 1NIND 10-0• 21'-0• 20'-0• r-w P.d W-T 4'-S• 4'4r 4'-r Ir-T I 4'4- 2-7am• h 10-r Or 17•4 1R- tY/ b b Q-0' 4'-0• lr4r Z. BEDROOM 2 r N MASTER BEDROOM io THE"DRA" REPR DU wtTHouT W D9SION N 7-4- r e• LE( g r-W 7-0- 2.7 Assoc ram•ram• 2033 EL W.7,SOUTH Wi 4 I d w I.c.BEDROOM 2 2'-W H h 74r r•r 1'-1- a o- r v r-a err r•r W BONUS RM.BEOR M 1 r° OPEN TO FOYER Q MICROLAM LVL MICROLAM LVL T-T 4'-0"TO 4'-T M W T14 O 1COIL-e'0' 1'-0• E-ENGINEERED ATTIC TRUSS 24'OIC V t h X O lleY w0 m H s 3'-0• C-0' e'-0- 5'-10• 5-IT 4•-0• 4'-T 3'-e- e'o' Y-W sr-w Ali 2r700 11: 40 8606684822 BARNETT CONST Page No. — of gages BARNETT CONSTRUCTION CO. 502222I. j 127 SPENCER ST SUFFIELD,CT 06078 1-860-668-4822 LlC.#54MB5 I ii P IOSAL SUe"IT'TED TO PHONE DATE oLA Ciwo E-Z-4-t2W5 /4"A 116 5 TT, JOB NAME LC4 Cie i d.) A&F r CrrY, TE AND ZIP CODS: JOB LOCATION , A 6k-APWg nC±6AQ o6n! Oua I ARCNIT ECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE C.. P60 bo s4i 44-49¢9 We hereby sub-d specthcalione eno ewlrnates for' LLow firp-t P-- te q Q_, 1i,•_ 2 !?dtr. ,SJ rJfi -' S --- -- --, 1 JOL e WILec e L.S cS f Ili jr hereby to furnish mated I and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications,forthe sum of, 1. 00, kA dollars(S Payment to made dS 011OWS' FOR ACCOUNTS OVER 30 DAYS 1 A%PER MONTH.18%PER ANNUM I Al,matey i.a guaranteed to be as C:' Al to be com tad m a workrrt9nhke manner ord n9to standard practi s Any a n orde atia mabove specdreationS AVthwaed nvol-^ng extra costs will to gxeCUted only upon wntten orders,and will baComQ an extra 51gneture Cr•arge over ano above the estimate All agreemAMS Contingent upon 5tnkes,accidents or I aetays oeyono our control Owner to carry fire,tomado arid other necessary insurance Our r is pr be workers are fully covered oy Workmen's Compensa>ton Inaurancs.mthdr""^by of rot °esptad wftftln d8ys LLr tt pfartte niI`[}1L1S 1 3 GNATURE The above pncea,specifications and condtons are satisfaclory and are hereby accepted You are authorized to do the i work as specrlied Payment will W made as outlined above i DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: 510NATURE i. .r .•.n . nnnr•nr• nnww n•nn won DEC 1 '00 12:44 8606684822 PAGE.002 Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 February 14, 2001 Allphase Roofing and Remodeling CERTIFIED MAIL 3 Enfield Street Windsor Locks, CT 06096 Re: Chase Orchards Roofing Woodbridge Models Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38 Dear Angelo: Recently you made repairs to the roof at lot# 5 at Chase Orchards to stop the leaking that was occurring. I have inspected the work that you completed with an independent roofing contractor and it appears the work has been completed satisfactorily. In our previous discussion after my letter to you of 12-10-00, you indicated it would be necessary to install a cricket to correct the leaking that was occurring. You further indicated that the reason the roofs were leaking was because crickets were not installed by the framing contractors and if they had been the original roof installations could have be done correctly and the roofs would not have leaked. When you made the corrections to lot# 5 you did not install the crickets you insisted were needed. Per my previous correspondence to you dated 12-10-00 1 disagreed with you position regarding the crickets and provided a written as well as a plan illustration of the method that should have been used to install the roofing correctly. My independent roofing contractor Mr. Leonard Barrett has confirmed my position regarding the crickets you claimed should have been installed and of the installation method I provided to you. It appears you applied that method to correct the leaking at lot# 5. You stated in a telephone message to me after receipt of my 12-10-00 correspondence that we did not provide sufficient materials for the correct installation. As you are aware, our agreement for your services provided that we supply all materials except nails for the installation. Part of those materials was Ice and Water Shield You stated in your message that we did not supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the valleys. May I remind you your workmen were not limited in quantity to the materials that were ordered by us for roof installation. We relied on you as a professional roofer experience in proper roofing application. We in fact did supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the roofing at all homes in Chase Orchards, however if you or your workmen indicated additional Ice and Water Shield was necessary for the Woodbridge models, it would have been supplied to you as it had on numerous occasions when your men indicated you were short materials. There remain eleven additional Woodbridge models at Chase Orchards, some continue to leak. I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Barrett's estimate to make the repairs to these eleven homes. I would like to give you the opportunity to make the repairs. Please contact the homeowners Page 2, Allphase listed on the enclosed ASAP to determine if any leaking is occurring and make repairs to homes that are leaking. Additionally the roof leaks have caused damage to the drywall and paint in several of the houses. I believe your insurance would cover the cost of those repairs and would request you contact them for inspection of the repairs that are necessary. You may want to make the repairs with your own workmen and I would agree if you were inclined to do so. These homeowners have been very patience in this matter and I would hope you would act expeditiously to make these corrections so as to not inconvenience them further. Thank you, John J. Doran, Member Chase Orchards, LLC Cc! Glenn Terk John Collins Terry Zenhder Erin & Mary Cole Bolla & Saundra Owodunni Scott & Laura Snyder John & Pam Valente Frank & Jewel Amoruso Charles & Sandra Graves Steve & Susan Suprenant Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri Jack & Susan Archambeault Carl & Beth Bishopric Jim & Kathryn Elder Wally & Ranke Orsamolu Chase Orchards Homeowners: Lot#4 Erin & Mary Cole 648-2714 Lot# 9 Scott & Laura Snyder 648-9097 Lot# 22 John & Pam Valente 644-2270 Lot# 26 Charles & Sandra Graves 648-9661 Lot# 27 Frank & Jewel Amoruso 644-2392 Lot# 30 Steve & Susan Suprenant 648-0034 Lot# 31 Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri 648-4032 Lot# 34 Jack & Susan Archambeault 285-5117 Jack work Lot# 36 Carl & Beth Bishopric 648-4686 Lot# 37 Jim & Kathryn Elder 648-4406 Lot# 38 Wally & Ranke Orsamolu 648-4481 Chase Orchards, LLC POB 752 Essex, Connecticut 06426 February 14, 2001 Re: Chase Orchards Roofing Woodbridge Models Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38 Dear Chase Orchards Homeowner: As you are aware, some buyers of Woodbridge model homes have experienced leaking between the sidewall of the upstairs front bedroom/study into the garage and sometimes basement area. We have worked diligently to have these repairs made by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling and I am hopeful they will make the repairs to other homes as they have to lot# 5. If the repairs are not made within 30 days receipt of my letter to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling copy enclosed), Chase Orchards will file small claims action against Allphase Roofing and Remodeling for each home that has a leaking roof, and will have the repairs made by Mr. Barrett. Thank you, John J Doran, Member Chase Orchards, LLC