Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1645 Ellington Road (8)R TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM D Application No. : MIT Date Received :MAR 26 1991Action/Public Hearing by : Receipt No. : South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission APPLICANT: Jr)hn G. Samsel , Jr. ADDRESS : 152 Deming Street, South Windsor, Ct. 06071ELEPHONE: 644-1157 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : John Samsel, Jr. ,Richard Mahoney & ADDRESS : c/o Clark Corners Associates, 152 Deminq St. ,Melvyn Marks South Windsor, Ct. 066-7-4 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast Corner of Ellington Road and Clark Street Intersection; see "Location_ Map" on ZONE: RC drawing No. 1 of site plan NAME, ADDRESS , & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: John Samsel, Jr. 152 Deming Street, South Windsor, Ct. 06074 TELEPHONE: 644-1157 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR : (Check one of the following) 1 . Zone Change to Public Hearing required) . 2 . Subdivision . 3. Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required) . 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Special Exception to Article Public Hearing Required) . X 6. Site Plan of Development. 7. Earth Filling [Section 10 ] and/or Earth Removal [Section 9] Public Hearing Required) . 8 . General Plan of Development . 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision 10. Other (explain in detail) : CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED IN TR LICATE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ON ATTACHED CHECKLIST. 00-7-- 7A e.iplicant Owner CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E. /L.S . ) declaringthatallrequiredinformationisprovided. Items 1-7 are requiredforallapplications ; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplies. 1 . On each sheet for plans or maps, titlee block with thefollowinginformation: a. Name , address and telephone of applicant . b. Name , address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. C. Name of Development. T d. Date when drawings were made. X _2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet, which can be used as an overlay onMetropolitanDistrictMaps. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surroundingpropertywithin500feet. X a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lo•t coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. X b. Layout of buildings C. Layout of streets and parking. d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows. X_ e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows. Y f . Names of surrounding property owners. X g . Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. X h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties. 3. Architectural Elevations: Plans of the proposedbuildingsdrawntoascaleof1/8" = V - 0" showingtheelevationsofallsidesoftheproposedbuildings in sufficient detail to show architectural styling . Architect ' s seal on elevations for buildings in excess of 5000 square feet (per CGS Chapter 390) . Page 2 (Site Plans) S'wV`j ar 4 . Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn toascaleof1inchequals40feetoneitherofthefollowingsizesheets: ( 1 ) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin ; (2) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin , containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line stations, curve data, and parking spaces . C. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures includingsigns, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened) e. Easements, noting grantors , grantees, and purpose. f. Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points , or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated . i. A-2 certification ; P.E. /L.S. Seal. roSi r+n rv1+r. j Ior 5. Topographic Map : A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to40feetonsheetsnotexceeding24inchesby36inches , including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following : a. All existing and proposed buildings. b. Curb lines and pavement width, sidewalks. C. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers . d . Existing and proposed water systems . e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines . Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot elevations . A g . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. Y h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls , manholes , lengths and sizes of pipes. (M*Ximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches. ) i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed. j . Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 Certification; P.E. /L.S, Seal. 6. Landscaping plan. 7. Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines . . X_8. Traffic report. N_9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to RIVATe 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 'feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage. C. Sight line at driveway & street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material. f . Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g . Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used . on all sites accessible to these controls . The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations , sizes, lengths , and slopes of pipes.- Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces , a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. 11 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems; the report should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points: a. General nature and development of surrounding area. b. Topography and natural drainage pattern. C. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level conditions , ledge rock, and general nature of soil. d. General description of type of development contemplated. e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various ground conditions, materials to be used, and the general layout pattern to be used, etc. f . Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. g. Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout . h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers . i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4. 13. 5. All information required above is included in this application at the time of submission . PLAN EP R R P. E. L.S . November , 1987 r I I CLARK CORNERS SITE PLAN 1 .Appli tion for a Ite plan of velopment on 11 .3 ac. of lan located on he southerly id of Ellington ad, ea erly side f Clark Stree , northerly side Deming S eet, RC zone. Th e aar six buildi s p ro ed totallirf 4 000 s ft.7' g P P g q T c ud ive o,f i s 1idings and a bank. 2 . rT T r --- - The proposed building coverage is 13 .5%; 25% allowed. The proposed impervious coverage is 40 . 3%; 65% allowed. These percentages do not include the open space of 4 . 36 acres which is proposed to remain in its natural state. The front yard setback line has been hled for all pavement also, so that all pavement is at least 65 feet from the street line. The parking requirement for these various uses is 176 spaces . The applicant is showing 176 spaces. It appears that all other zoning requirements have been met. 3 . 5],i/ whe receOrd two v ances . In November of 1988, ed variances be re1-1eved,. from the 50' nt alon lling n RoaAand ClarkStreet. a Town ecentl appli for and/teceived a the f ro t yard etback, line to a.low it/to mit cur ently when Clark Street is recthis' summer. With the setback variance, the closest building will stil be set back 40' from the edge of pavement. 4 . VWat an sew are ailable. Wa r Pol ution Contr Y hor' y- a prova is required; t app 'c t is scheduled o m with C on May/21 . Sewerage la ave eenP coo. inapt be this app i nt d th Be n-Ru o laV off* acros Clar]c §treet so at b h ma be rued by the ewer a ensioh. LThe fi e marshal has indicated, he has no concerns with the proposed layout. D -^-L 5 . There is no 100 year floodplain on this site. This- a y n 3y-r`u e requiring a bond in the amount of 15,000 . (This incorporates this site as well as Kirby Holcomb's site. ) In addition, they are requiring a long term maintenance plan to be included for the 4 .86 acres of open space to ensure that it is maintained as open space. 6 . There is only one entrance proposed into the site off of Clark Street. A traffic study has been prepared by the applicant and indicates that the proposed development will not disrupt traffic flow on the adjacent roadway system. The traffic report does indicate that left turns from Ellington Road onto Clark Ostreet encoutnter Level of Service f during both peak hours either with or without this development. This application will more than double the number of vehicles making that left turn onto Clark Street during the a.m. peak hour; and Town staff expressed concern that these left-turning vehicles would increase the disruption to through vehicles heading west on Ellingtoln Road. In response to this concern, the applicant's plans show a widening on the south side of Ellington Road along the applicant' s frontage to provide bypass capability on Elliington Road. Restriping of Ellington Road may be necessary in order to be sure the widening serves its purpose. 7 . Clark Street reconstruction will begin in earnest this spring. Town staff were also concerned that the newly reconstructed Clark Street not be subsequently torn up for utility installation; and the applicant has agreed to coordinate his utilities construction with reconstruction of Clark Street so the street may be left intact. The site plan shows sidewalks along the Ellington Road and Clark Street frontage to the site driveway. 8 . The landscaping plan proposed for the site shows a variety of trees, shrubs and perennial plants . The plan includes street trees along Clark and Deming streets . f `The Architecture and Design Review Board has reviewed these plans 1' and have made the following comments: they like the architecture style and size proposed for the building would like to see a berm incorporated along the corner of Clark Street and Deming Street would like to see additional plantings placed in this corner to attempt to soften the parking lot they request the applicant come back in with more definitive architecturals as each building is proposed. Also, they would like a chance to review the proposed signage. If this application is approved, there are no other planning department modifications to request. Ir S Y INDEX A. Statement of Purpose B. Introduction C. Operation and Maintenance Plan D. Resume of Christopher Stone E. Zoning Board of Appeals Letter of Approval F. Zoning Board of Appeals Letter of Approval Front Yard Set Back Approval) G. Inland Wetlands Conservation Commission Approval Letter H. Reconstruction Letter RE: Clark Street Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works) I. Letter fromn Department of Environmental Protection J. Application for Planning and Zoning RE: Clark Corners K. Letter from Mr. Stanley Waldron L. Letter from Mr. and Mrs. Steven Andross M. Letter from Mr. and Mrs. Lenoard Cote N. Letter from Fire Marshall William Lanning 0. Traffic Study from Fuss and O'Neill - (Separate Booklet) P. Letter from J. Kirby Holcombe Q. Letter from Ronald Morin APPLICATION OF JOHN SAMSEL, JR. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The purpose of the regulated activities is to provide parking, access and drainage for a proposed office and commercial development on the upland portions of the site. Please refer to Erosion and Seditment Control Plan" (Sheet 5 of 10) of the site plans submitted with this application for the wetlands and watercourse boundary, 40 foot setback delineation and location of regulated activities. A summary of wetlands impacts is provided on sheet 5, but the overall impact has been reduced from the former application from 3.63 Ac (41%) to 2.83 Ac (3 2%). This area includes an increase in proposed waterbody of 0.33 Ac. INTRODUCTION Since South Windsor was a country town, consisting of tobacco and potato fields, one of its three political centers lay at Wapping, at the intersection of the farmers' arterial roads of Clark Street, Buckland Road, Sullivan Avenue (formerly Wapping Road) and Oakland Street, where they intersected with the major east/west highway of the town, Ellington Road just as it turned to the northeast. Here were the Congregational and Methodist/ Episcopal churches and their parsonages and church yards, the post office, the high school, and a number of stores. Through the nineteenth century, the Stoughtons, the Clarks, the Grants, Sextons and Carters owned land in and around Wapping and ran the small businesses and shops of the center. As the town developed, the high school and the town hall, municipal government center became to be also located at the Five Corners of Wapping. Because Clark Street did not intersect Ellington Road directly at Five Corners, the stretch of Ellington Road from Clark Street to Five Corners became a locus of the small businesses and stores that served the town. Virtually all traffic from the southwest and west would pass those locations. Thus, the Zoning Commission properly rezoned the entire quadrant to RC Restricted Commercial Zone, in anticipation of the planned growth of the western highlands of the town. Since that time, a number of commercial developments have been approved in the quadrant. The last major vacant portion of the quadrant consists of an over fifteen acre parcel of land lying along the easterly street line of Clark Road from Deming Street to Ellington Road, and is characterized by a rolling, wooded, and meadowed tract, divided by wetlands along a farm pond built in 1976 as approved by the Soils Conservation Service, and a brook flowing northerly to and crossing Ellington Road. Tonight, John Samsel, Jr., and Clark Corners Associates, the owners of the subject parcel, are applying for zoning approval for a cluster of six federal/colonial style buildings consisting of 44,000. square feet. At this date, it is anticipated that, there would be a mixed use of office, restaurant, and banking facilities. The meadow, the pond, a new pond, and the woodlands will form a significant site amenity, and most will be dedicated as open space under a conservation restriction. The character of the neighborhood, the plan of development of the town, the intersection of the arterial highways, the environmentally sensitive character of the site, all require a careful, sympathetic, low scale business development of the site, in accordance with the requirements of sound planning and good zoning practice. The Clark Corners project was designed with the input and help of the surrounding neighbors. The size, design and location of each building are such to create a smooth transition from residental to a commercial area in the center of South Windsor. Site Plan Application of John Samsel, Jr . et al - Clark Corners Statement of Conformance with Applicable Zoning Regulations Section of Regulations Required Comment 2 . 0 General Requirements Plans conform to General Requirements . 3 .9 Corner Visibility On a corner lot, no wall, No obstructions to fence or other structure view will occur . shall be erected and no hedge, shrub, or tree or other growth shall be maintained between the building line and street line, if the same creates a traffic hazard by obstructing the view 4 . 4 RC-Restricted Commercial 4 . 4 2 . 1 Commercial and professional Proposed mixed and offices, financial institutions uses are 4 . 4 2 . 2 and agencies, retail stores, are permitted, permitted uses . applicant proposes 44, 000 sq. ft. office ) 4 . 4 . 3 Two signs on premises Sign details to be advertising business or described at product; if not affixed to Public Hearing building not to exceed 12 square feet in area. 4 . 4 . 4 Site development plan required Provided and in accordance with section 4 . 13 . complete . 4 .13 Form and Content of Final Site Complete-Town Development Plans Staff requirements have been addressed . Section of Regulations Schedule of Areas, Yards and Height Requirements 5 . 2 Min. Lot area 30, 000 sf 15 . 29 acres Min. Lot width 150 sf 158 ft Min. Lot depth 150 sf 11150 ft Max. stories 3 2 Max. Height 45 ft 35 ft Max. lot coverage 25% 4 . 0% Min. front yard 65 ft 65 ft Min. rear yard 25 ft 25 ft Min. side yard 10 ft 10 ft Section of Regulations Reguired Coments 5 . 4 Buffer 50 feet buffer from Variance residential zone obtained 8 . 0 Off Street Parking and Loading 8 . 3 Parking space shall be no less Provided than 10 feet by 20 feet . 8 . 4 8 spaces per 1, 000 sf of gross 4 per 1, 000 sf office space for business office provided offices and financial institutions . 8 . 4 . 1 Modification of Minimum Required Parking Spaces 176 parking spaces required Proposed 176 4 per 1, 000 sf office ) parking spaces Section of Regulations Modification of Minimum Required Parking Spaces 8 . 5 In the case of more than one Computed in use of a building or lot, accordance required parking facilities with Section shall be construed to be the 8 . 5, however sum of the requirements for request re- all uses computed separately duction in according to the Schedule in 8 . 4 . accordance with Section 8 . 4 . 1 Off-Street Loading Requirements 8 . 6 a . Loading space shall be not less than 1Ox25xl4; b. Every building or block of buildings containing more than 5000 sf gross floor area of retail trade requires one loading space 8 . 7 . 3 Lighting of parking areas and This will be access of driveways shall have the achieved . light source shaded from residential districts and public streets . CONCLUSION The proposal before you tonight has been the result of the careful analysis and study of the site and its environs, and is made by a local businessman whose previous developments have been a credit to the character and image of the town of South Windsor. The buidlings are small in scale, and provide a transition from the business of five corners to the open residential and rural character of the town to the southwest. As special permited uses in the RC zone, if the applicant demonstrates conformity with the standards of the application, the proposal is permitted. Each and every element of the RC zone standards has been met or exceeded. The consultants and Mr. Samsel have checked off each item, and have proven without question the standards are fulfilled. Mr. Samsel and his design and engineering team have demonstrated that the proposed design is the inevitable solution to the problems of the site, the culmination of the opportunities that the site offers, and the finest design resolution of the structures of zoning, planning and character requirments of the orderly and well-planned development of South Windsor in the last part of the twentieth century. We hope that you will look upon this application in a favorable manner. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN CLARK CORNERS JOHN SAMSEL ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT All activities identified will be performed at least annually: SWALE AREA & NON-LAWN OPEN SPACE 1 . Inspect the swale by walking the entire length, noting erosion and seepage areas, depressions, and rodent holes . Revegetate as called for in the original specifications for permanent seeding. If rodent damage is more than minimal, devise and initiate an eradication plan. Cut all woody vegetation within the swale at ground level and treat to insure that it does not become reestablished. Utilize only non-residual herbicides. 2 . Examine rock riprap and bedding (if visible) and make repairs necessary to meet original requirements . Rock shall be durable and resistant to weathering; shales and siltstone shall not be used. Remove any siltation and regrade to proper pitch to insure proper drainage of the swale. 3 . All areas void of vegetation shall be reseeded with the permanent seed mixture as called for in the original specifications. 4 . Mow all vegetated areas at least annually. DETENTION AREAS 1 . Cut all woody vegetation within 15 ' of the outlet and inlet channels . Remove dead trees, snags, and debris which may block the functioning of the outlet during a flood event. 2 . Inspect any trees and shrubs planted under the construction contract and prune, replace or supplement woody vegetation as necessary. 3 . Inspect and clean the culvert(s) under Ellington Road to insure free drainage so that the road does not act as a dam" during flood events. 4 . Control the undesirable plants (reed grass, purple loosestriffe, multiflora rose) by weeding or spot herbicide treatment. Utilize only non-residual herbicides. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES & BIOFILTERS 1 . Repair spalled or cracked concrete by replacement with a high strength, non-shrink, non-metallic, cement-based grout. 2 . Check for erosion or settlement around concrete structures. Fill any settled areas with a properly graded gravel or 3 . Inspect riprap and bedding in the biofilter for displaced, dislodged, or deteriorated materials . Properly graded and durable materials shall be used to repair damaged areas . Inspect the channel for growth of woody growth which restricts flow and remove such growth if present. Inspect the earth portions of the outlet channel for erosion on the side slopes and bed. Stabilize eroded areas by regrading to a stable side slope and installing vegetation, jute matting, or riprap, as necessary. CHRISTOPHER 0. STONE, P.E. EDUCATION B.S.E. Civil and Urban Engineering, University of Pennsylvania Licensed Professional Engineer - Connecticut PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Stone joined Fuss & O'Neill in 1982. His involvement in a broad spectrum of civil and environmental engineering applications has contributed to his primary expertise in the area of site design. His responsibilities cover the entire range of project design and management from conceputal drawings to final approvals and construction. Examples of his experience encompassing these qualities include: Site utility and roadway design for industrial and residential subdivisions, including st o rmwate r managment, parking design, grading, water, sewer, and utility layouts. Also construction cost, estimates, specifications, and administration; Specialized designs and presentations of soil erosion and sediment control plans for subdivisions, excavation sites, landfills, roadways, and flood hazard zones for review by Soil and Water Conservation District staff. Participated in special workshop on soil erosion and sediment control conducted by the Connecticut Council on Soil and Water Conservation; Designs, specifications, cost estimates, and detailed reports for rehabilitation of roadway networks and fuel transport facilities at U.S. Naval Stations at Newport and Melville, Rhode Island, South Weymouth, Massachusetts, and Casco Bay, Maine. Prepared for Federal review and approval. Received special commendation for excellence; All aspects of municipal, state, and federal site-oriented applications, including local zoning, subdivision, and wetlands application processes as well as Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection discharge and diversion permits and Federal Emergency Management Agency flood boundary permits; Preparation and presentation of site-oriented reports for private clients, attorneys, developers, local commissions, and government review, including presentations to local boards. t C CJ v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 Solt-co' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 November 4, 1988 Clark Corners Associates 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Reference: Application #1886-88 Gentlemen: At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 3, 1988, a variance to Section 5.4 of the buffer regulations was granted as follows: 1) Allowed not to adhere to the 50' buffer requirement along entire length of Ellington Road and Clark Street. 2) Allowed not to adhere to the 50' buffer requirement along Deming Street from the intersection of Clark Street to the boundary line of the open space as shown on the plot plan. The variance granted is conditional upon site plan approval from the Planning Department. Also, the "intent of buffer" should be complied with. This action is effective November 18, 1988, and upon your filing of the en- closed form in the Town Clerk's office at your own expense. Very, truly yours, z. ..,I IL A_006 Richard H. Eriksson Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RHE:mr Enclosure: No schedule A attached) I , Richard H. Eriksson, Chairman Of"the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals , hereby certify that on ;1' 179 November 3, 1988 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to Clark Corner Associates, 152 Deming Street, S. Windsor, CT a variance to Section 5.4 of the Zoning Regulations to be allowed not to adhere to the 50' buffer requirement F along entire length of Ellington Rd. & Clark Street, to be allowed not to adhere to the 50' buffer requirement along Deming St. , from the intersection of Clark St. to the boundary line of the open space as shown on the plot plan, conditional i 'Intent of BuffeF"-. on premises located at corner of Clark Street and Ellington Rd, S. Windsor and more particularly bounded and described as follows : SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE IER OF RECORD: John G. Samsel Jr. , Richard T.. Mahnnpy MPlvvn R Marlcc Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut 1 4OF-APPEALS day of NnvPmhar 19_gg_. It icharcd' ZONING B PUBLIC ACT # 75-317 19 8 Received for Record this day of t----Rece at A ATTEST: TOWrT , L Assistant ivw r February 21, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I L Ms. Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor Director of Planning 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct 06074 RE: ZBA Application #1621-91 - Ellington Rd. & Clark St. Dear Ms. Banach: At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on February 7, 1991, a variance was granted to Section 5.2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow less than the required front yard setback on property located at the southeast corner of Ellington Rd. and Clark St . (RC Zone) The Board noted the variance will allow the buildings, as defined on the application or any modifications made by the Planning & Zoning Commission, to be placed on the existing building line, as shown on the plan submitted. This action is effective upon your filing of the enclosed form in th Town Clerk's office at your own expense. Very truly yours, Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW:dlb Enclosure I, Robert Warren, Chairman of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals, hereby certify that on 2/7/91 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to: the Town of South Windsor a variance to Section 5 . 2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow less than the required front yard setback on premises located at the southeast corner of Ellington Rd . and Clark St . and more particularly bounded and described as follows: i FIRST PIECEt NORTHF.RLYt By premises owned now or formerly by Florence Waldron] EASTERLY i SOUTHERLYt By the SECOND FIECE hereinafter described{ and WESTERLYt By Clark Street, so-called. isid premises contain approximately 2.2 acre• of land. and are more particularly described in a Dead appearing in Vol. 46 Page 235 of the South Windsor Land Records, PECOttD PIECEt HORTHERLYt By the FIRST PIECE above daccribed and by land formerly of Lillian H. Mayo, nor said to belong to Old* Wapping Realty, Inc., in part by each{ EASTERLYt By land nov or formerly of Thomas J. Molloy, Jr., at ux{ SOUTHERM By Deming Street, so-called{ and WESTUM By the curve of the are of Deming Street at its intersection vith Clark Street, and by the FIRST PIECE above described, in part by each. t / OWNER OF RECORD: John S am s e t Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 24thday of Feb ' 19 91 RES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC ACT #75-317 Received for Record this day of 19 at ATTEST: TOWN CLERK Jim at 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203 644-2511 March 13, 1991 John Samsel, Jr. Clark Corners Associates 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: Re: Application #90-80P, Clark Corners At the March 11, 1991 meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions Application 90-80P - IWA/CC permit for the construction of office buildings on property located on the southeast corner of Ellington Road, easterly side of Clark Street and northerly side of Deming Street, RC zone as shown on plans prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. , Project #87-546 dated August 30, 1988, revised December 14, 1990. 1 . Two blueprint copies of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission . This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. 2 . Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3 . The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4 . The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on March 11, 1992. 5 . All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6 . A contact person shall be identified directly on the plans. 7 . We recommend a bond in the amount of $15,000.00 to be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. It01i y r T-a 01 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 R•CO AREA CODE 203 644-2511 April 15, 1991 Mr. John Samsel Buckland Professional Center 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: Subject: R.O.W. - Clark Street Pursuant to our previous conversations, you have indicated a willingness to provide at no cost, the R.O.W. area along Clark Street to permit the Town' s road improvement work to be undertaken. Initially, you had concerns about granting said R.O.W. because of the building line locations relative to a new R.O.W. line and any proposed building you were considering for the property. The Town, on your behalf, applied for and was granted a variance allowing the buildings to be placed on the existing building line. Enclosed, again for your consideration, are the easement documents . As the Town is ready to initiate its reconstruction project, please advise by April 24, 1991 if you are willing to grant the R.O.W. at no cost to the Town. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Michael J. Gdatick, P.E. Director of Public Works MJG:bmr Enclosures Certified Mail: P 007 592 673 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION U.J% NATURAL RESOURCES CENTER 165 Capitol Avenue, Room 553 Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Biology Program 17 January 1989 John Samsel Samsel Properties 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel , I have reviewed Natural Diversity Data Base maps and files regarding the area delineated on the map ,you provided: SouthWindsor - proposed office park in Ellington Rd. /Clark Street area. - According to our information there are no known extant populations of Federally Threatened Species and Connecticut Species of Special Concern" known to occur at or adjacent tothesiteinquestion. Natural Diversity Data Base information includes allinfor.'mation regarding critical biologic resources available to usatthetimeoftherequest . This information is a compilation ofdatacollectedovertheyearsbytheNaturalResourcesCenter' s Geological and Natural History Survey and cuuper•aLing units ofDEP, private conservation groups and the scientific community.This information is not necessarily the result of comprehensive or site-specific field investigations . Consultation with theDataBaseshouldnotbesubstitutedforon-site surveys requiredforenvironmentalassessments . Current research projects and new c•01it "ibutors continue to identify additional populations of species and locations of habitats of concern, as well as , enhance existing data. Such new information is incorporated into theDataBaseasitbecomesavailable . Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this information ( 566-3540 ) . Thank-you for consulting the Natural Diversity Data Base. Sincerely, Nancy M. Murray Biologist/Data M7ager Phone: 165 Capitol Avenue • Hartford, Connecticut 06106 An Equal Opportunity Employer H TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM OSOR.00 Application No . : Date Received : Action/Public Hearing by : Receipt No . : APPLICANT: John G. Samsel , Jr. ADDRESS : 152 Deming Street, South Windsor, Ct. 06071ELEPHONE: 644-1157 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : John Samsel, Jr. ,Richard Mahoney & ADDRESS : c/o Clark Corners Associates, 152 Deminq St. ,Melvyn Marks South Windsor, Ct. COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast Corner of Ellington Road and Clark Street Intersection; see "Location Map" on ZONE: RC drawing No. 1 of site plan NAME, ADDRESS , & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: John Samsel, Jr. 152 Deming Street, South Windsor, Ct. 06074 TELEPHONE: 644-1157 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR : (Check one of the following) 1 . Zone Change to Public Hearing required) . 2 . Subdivision . 3. Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required) . 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Special Exception to Article Public Hearing Required) . X 6. Site Plan of Development. 7. Earth Filling (Section 10] and/or Earth Removal [Section 9] Public Hearing Required) . 8 . General Plan of Development . 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision 10. Other (explain in detail) : CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED IN TR LICATE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ON ATTACHED CHECKLIST. plicant Owner CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E. /L.S . ) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications ; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplies. 1 . On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information: X a. Name , address and telephone of applicant . b. Name , address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. C . Name of Development. X d. Date when drawings were made. 2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet, which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet. X a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lo*t coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements , etc. X b . Layout of buildings C. Layout of streets and parking. d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows. X e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows. X f . Names of surrounding property owners. X g. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. X h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties. 3 . Architectural Elevations: Plans of the proposed buildings drawn to a scale of 1/8" = V - 0" showing the elevations of all sides of the proposed buildings in sufficient detail to show architectural styling . Architect' s seal on elevations for buildings in excess of 5000 square feet ( per CGS Chapter 390) . Page 2 (Site Plans) 4 . Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: ( 1) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled _ margin ; (2) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin , containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line stations, curve data, and parking spaces . C. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened) e. Easements, noting grantors , grantees, and purpose. f . Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points , or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated . These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. i. A-2 certification; P .E. /L.S. Seal. ros;.o+n Cr+r•I j/or 5. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: a. All existing and proposed buildings. b . Curb lines and pavement width, sidewalks. C. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers . d . Existing and proposed water systems . x e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines . T Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. v f . Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot elevations . g . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins , endwalls, manholes , lengths and sizes of pipes. (M*Ximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches . ) i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed. j . Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 Certification; P.E. /L.S, Seal. 6. Landscaping plan. 7. Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines . . 8. Traffic report. lye 9. Plans and Profiles : A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to VATS 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage. C. Sight line at driveway & street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material. f . Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g . Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used - on all sites accessible to these controls . The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations , sizes, lengths , and slopes of pipes.- Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. NA 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. 11 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems; the report should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points: a. General nature and development of surrounding area. b. Topography and natural drainage pattern. C. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level conditions, ledge rock, and general nature of soil. d. General description of type of development contemplated. e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various ground conditions, materials to be used, and the general layout pattern to be used, etc. f . Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. g. Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout . h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers . i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4. 13. 5. All information required above is included in this application at the time of submission. s l PLAN TIREPARSR P. E. L. . November , 1987 W May 6, 1991 Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Chairman and Members. I am the property owner of the property on 859 Clark Street immediately across the street from the land owned by John Samsel, Jr. and his partners. I believe an application is pending before your commission on what is to be Clark Corners. Recently, everyone in authority in the Town of South Windsor has considered Wapping Center to be the commercial center of South Windsor. The master plan adopted by the town and reaffirmed repeatedly shows that site as being considered ideally suited for commercial use. I agree 100% that the property should be developed on that basis. I can conceive of no reason in the world why there will be any problem so long as commercial water and sewer are available for its development. I farmed that land for years, the water drains naturally, and reasonable safeguards for the elimination of excess water should not prohibit the development of that land. About the year 1946, my brother and I, blasted the present man-made swale to better drain what was then a swamp near Clark Street. Again, with the approval of the State Soil Conservation Service, about 1976, I established a pond and improved the drainage swale to Ellington Road with a drag line. Thus, the man-made pond and swale. The wetlands map adoped by the Town of South Windsor was not truly a wetlands map. A large percentage of the soil conservation map covered an area that was not truly wetlands. Everyone who bought property surrounding that tract, was well aware of the fact that they had bought adjacent to future commercial use. They should have no complaints with its development. The additional revenue to the Town of South Windsor in the form of additional taxes, services to be provided, and the use of the land according to its maximum capabilities, would be in the best interest of the town and its taxpayers. Unreasonable restriction, and denial of reasonable plans based upon professional advice, makes me wonder what is happening. I am in favor of and strongly urge you to approve the plans submitted Sincerely, r'uj'ot Stanley aldron May 1, 1991 Steven and Jill Andross 1583 Ellington Road South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 To Whom It May Concern, We wish it to be known that we are not opposed to the proposed development referred to as Clark Corners located on the propertyr- formally owned by the Waldron family bordering Clark Street, Ellington Road and Deming Street. I am a resident of South Windsor for thirty-two years and Jill for nine. Together we have seen much development in this town and feel that John Samsel, Jr's proposed development of the above mentioned parcel will be an asset to the residents of South Windsor and the best use of that particular property. Sincerely, Cell Steven Andross Jill Andross May 1, 1991 Leonard and Judy Cote 748 Clark Street South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Samsel Properties 152 Deming Street South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear John, Although I would like to see our town keep the rural atmosphere that prompted me to move my family here, I do realize that time does bring about constant change. I have seen some proposals for developing the parcel that you call Clark Corners and was more than a little astonished at the total disregard their obvious detrimental impact had on our town. I, came away from your presentation last night feeling that at last someone wants more than a fast profit, regardless of what effect it may have on the neighborhood. I'm convinced that the town will have to go far to equal your proposal. Just as improtant, when I look at what you have just a short way further down Deming Street, I have no reason to doubt that Clark Corners will continue to be an asset to this neighborhood for many years. Thank you again for allowing me to attend your preseentation and Good Luck. Sincere , Leon rd Cote 374 Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor, Conn. 06074 May 14, 1991 Mrs. Louise Evans, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Conn. 06074 Re: Application #91-10 Clark Corners. Dear Mrs. Evans, I would like to express my support for application 91-10 Clark Corners. I am unable to attend the public hearing as I will be out of Town. It is my intention to develop the property immediately adjacent to Clark Corners and I think this project of John Samsel 's is an asset to my project as well as the Town. Mr. Samsel 's buildings are always very attractive and well maintained. V/er tr y o s, Ki y Holcombe r NATIONWIDE INSURANCE Ronald P. Morin,CLU,ChFC Nationwide is on your sid Buckland Hills Ins Agency r HOME OFFICE ONE NATIONWIDE PLAZA•COLUMBUS,OHIO 43216 Box 828 497 Buckland Rd South Windsor, CT 06074' 203) 644-3800 May 14, 1991 Town of South Windsor, CT Sullivan Ave South Windsor, CT 06074 ATTN: Ping. & Zoning I would like to take this opportunity to state my personal support for the office project known as Clark Corners here in South Windsor. The contractor/builder for the office project has shown both himself and his company to be excellent citizens and civic supporters here in the town. There buildings have always been among the best maintained in this town which only adds to the quality of life here. They have made their other buildings available to the town, such as the fire department, for training. I firmly believe that granting approval for the Clark Corners project will improve that section of town for all as we move to make the best use of our available land for the benefit of both the residents and that segment of the business community that has been targeted for growth here in South Windsor. Sincerely, Ronald P. Morin,CLU,ChFC CLARK CORNERS ASSOCIATES Richard L. Mahoney 152 Deming Street Melvyn B. Marks South Windsor, CT 06074 John Samsel, Jr. 203) 644-1157 FAX: (203) 644-5992 December 14, 1990 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State of Connecticut Traffic Commission Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill P. 0. Drawer A Wethersfield., Connecticut 0 610 9-0 8 01 RE: STC# 132-8906-01 Dear Mr. Stoeckert Please be advised that, Clark Corners Associates, is in the process of reapplying to both Inland/Westlands Commission and Planning and Zoning for development of property located at the corner of Ellington, Road, Clark Street and Deming Street. Clark Corners Associates would like to have the above file number kept open. We realize that there will be changes in traffic data and analysis. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you should have any questions, please call. Sincerely, John Samsel, Jr. For Clark Corners Associates cc. Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Mr. Daniel W. O'Neil Q;)- Z),v L s-t• M.a . r 71a 07eu 9 v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 20, 1990 TO: James A. Lombardi, Chairman, Inland_ Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission FROM: John E. McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer - • RE: Application #90-80P, Clark Corners (John Samsel, Jr. ) DOCUMENTS REVIEWED: Application form and plans titled "Clark Corners" dated 12/14/90. COMMENTS: 1. On December 14, 1990 Kirby Holcombe and John Samsel, Jr. each submitted applications. Kirby Holcombe was applying for the activity easterly of the swale and John Samsel, Jr. was applying for the activity westerly of the swale. As the property is still legally one piece; and the drainag improvements, "wetlands creation" , calculation of impacts and like are addressed based on the total 15.29 acres, it was decided that this should be submitted as one application. Kirby Holcombe withdrew his application on December 18, 1990. 2. There have been previous proposals for this site which were denied by the Agency. The most recent application was #89- 50P, Clark Corners which was denied on October 30, 1989 and is currently pending litigation. A copy of the Agency's denial and concerns is attached. As part of the presentation the applicant should identify the changes made to the plans with regard to those concerns. 3 . Previous applications were scheduled for a public hearing. It would seem that this should also be scheduled for a public hearing and, at such time, the applicant should ensure that the "prudent and feasible alternatives" issue is addressed. 4 . The previous application (#89-50P) represented 2.83 acres of wetland/watercourse alteration. This application represents 2.59 acres of wetland/watercourse alteration. This includes approximately' 2,800 yards of fill material. The reduction in wetland/watercourse alteration is a r sult of eliminating the crossing of the swale. James A. Lombardi Page Two December 20, 1990 Application #90-80P 5 . Sheet 5 of 10 has a summary table which indicates the wetland impacts in terms of acreage. Of the total 15.29 acres included on this site, 8.8 acres is designated as wetland. The total wetland disturbance is 2.59 acres, the total fill area is 2.04 acres with the remaining .55 acre being reworked for the proposed pond. 6 . The proposed pond, which also appears to function as a detention basin, is identified as a "wetland creation" . This is more appropriately a wetland enhancement as it is already a wetland by soil type. The landscaping plan includes various zones for water plants which are to be part of the final product. Wetland creation is a relatively new concept and additional groundwater and drainage information is necessary for an accurate evaluation. There should be a professional representative, who has expertise in wetland creation, available during the construction process. 7 . There were several documents that have been part of past applications which should be submitted with this application (i.e. , statement of purpose, drainage calculations, soil report, vegetative and wildlife information (including Natural Diversity Data Base report) and alternatives considered. 8 . A detail for the discharge point "biofilter typicals" , as shown on sheet 5 of 10, is included on sheet 7 of 10 . On sheet 4 of 10, the asterisk indicating the biofilters should be replaced with a more accurate representation like that shown on sheet 5 of 10) . 9 . It may be necessary to provide backup erosion and sedimentation checkdams downstream of the project. This could be done via placement of staked haybales in the stream northerly of Ellington Road. Permission to place checkdams downstream would have to be gained from the owner of that property. A note should be added to the plan stating that this will be done if necessary. 10 . Fabric siltation fences are recommended, instead of haybales, in those areas where they will be in place for any extended period of time. r' Mr. James Lombardi Page Three December 20, 1990 Application #90-80P 11. The phasing of the project, as shown on sheet 5 of 10, should more accurately reflect the dividing of the development- easterly and westerly of the swale. The biofilters should be installed as part of phase I with the installation of the drainage structures. The phasing limits, once clarified, should be physically established on the site during construction. 12. Spot elevations should be provided for the existing watercourse as well as any proposed grades that may be necessary to ensure proper drainage. 13 . An anti-tracking apron should be shown on sheet 5 of 10 for the entrance/exit off Ellington Road. 14 . The application form doesn't indicate that abutters have been notified by certified mail. This should be done and proof of notification, as well as a sample copy of the letter, should be submitted. 15 . With the proposed roadway off Ellington Road they should consider relocating the "organic material stockpile for wetland creation" to a more appropriate location. 16 . The application form indicates "clean free draining material per DOT form #814" . The fill used should conform to clean fill per section 2.1t of the Regulations. This definition, and a note, should be included on the plans . 17 . It would appear that a dumpster is proposed easterly of the swale. This should be labeled as such. 18 . A detail should be provided for the proposed foot bridge. 19 . The cover sheet indicates 28.7% impervious coverage. It would seem that this has been reduced slightly and the figure should be adjusted if appropriate. 20 . A plan should be submitted for the long term maintenance of the proposed 4. 86 acres of open space. 21 . Note #1 of the construction schedule ,on sheet 7 of 10, should be modified to reflect new proposed commencement dates . Mr. James Lombardi Pacfe 4 December 20 1990 Application #90-80P 22. The Agency was once shown a plan which represented the elimination of building H . The square footage was added 1 between buildings "C" and G , with a small portion also being added to building DII . This should be considered as it slightly reduces the wetland impacts in that area. 23 . These comments should be addressed before final action or decision by the Agency. c r a u Ts 4s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINOSOR. CONN. 06074osot•co' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 November 2, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL John G. Samsel, Jr. 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: Re: Application #89-50P, Clark Corners At the October 30, 1989 meeting of the South Windsor Inland WetlandsAgency/Conservation Commission, Application #89-50P, Clark Cornerswasdenied. The concerns expressed by the Agency are: 1 . In accordance with Connecticut State Statutes theCommissionfeelsthereisaviablealternativeto crossingthewetlands. Q 2• The impact on the downstream wetlands. 3 • The creation of wetlands in a wetland. Very truly yours-1 James A. Lombardi, ChairmanInlandWetlands- Agency/Conservation Commission JAL/pmm cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of PlanningMichael__J. Gantick, _Director of Public WorksJohnR. Collins, Clri-ef gVi1U1IIg_Of f icialPlanning & Zoning CommissionJerryIazzetta, Town EngineerCynthiaJ. Gurrieri, Robinson & Cole, One CommercialP1azaHartford, CT 06103-3597Fuss & O'N*ill, Consulting Engineers, 146 Hartford RoadManchester, CT 06040 r- iY- F'*34'i.r+'n r d6:°-•.11 T o'e" at4 C mac,1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. pl-Co' AREA CODE 20 3/644-2511 f FES 2.5 i991 SD. WINDSOR PLAPIN)IVG DEpT, February 211, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I La. Ms. Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor Director of Planning 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct 06074 RE: ZBA Application #1621-91 - Ellington Rd. & Clark St. Dear Ms. Banach: At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on February 7,1991, a variance was granted to Section 5. 2 of the ZoningRegulationstoallowlessthantherequiredfrontyardsetbackonpropertylocatedatthesoutheastcornerofEllingtonRd . and ClarkSt . (RC Zone) The Board noted the variance will allow the buildings, as defined ontheapplicationoranymodificationsmadebythePlanning & ZoningCommission, to be placed on the existing building line, as shown ontheplansubmitted . This action is effective upon your filing of the enclosed form intheTownClerk's office at your own expense. Very truly yours, Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW:dlb Enclosure TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT March 8, 1991 F CON GotiH'i, W• o.•• Its Co No. 16469 •• Z. : N13321 % EN ,,G` Gi sS' ......ZONAL i 0NAL E 6` . Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT 06040 Project No. 87-546 DWO0212B91/87-546 O FUSS&aNEILL consulting engineers March 8, 1991 Ms. Marcia Banach Town Planner South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Traffic Impact Report Clark Corners Dear Ms. Banach: On behalf of Samsel Properties, we are submitting herewith eight copies of the Traffic Impact Report for Clark Corners. This report evaluates the impact of the development's generated traffic on the surrounding roadway network. Should you have any questions regarding the attached material, please contact us. Very truly yours, J- eD Daniel W. O'Neill, P.E. 4p en F.XMmichellA, P. Transportation Engineer Associate Director of Traffic Engineering DWO:SFM:gp Enclosures DWO0212891/87-546 cc: J. Samsel 146 HARTFORD RD. / MANCHESTER, CT 06040 /TEL: (203) 646-2469, FAX: (203) 643-6313 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY RECYCLED PAPER TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i A. INTRODUCTION 1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 C. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 2 D. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 4 E. ANALYSES 5 F. CONCLUSIONS 8 APPENDIX A - TABLES 1. HOURLY TRIP GENERATION VOLUMES 2. TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3. LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY APPENDIX B - FIGURES 1. SITE LOCATION MAP 2. TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS 3. 1992 A.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4. 1992 P.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5. ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION 6. A.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 7. P.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 8. 1992 A.M. PEAK HOUR COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9. 1992 P.M. PEAK HOUR COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES APPENDIX C - A.M. PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D - P.M. PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS DWO0212B91/87-546 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As an aide to reviewers, the Executive Summary has been included to outline the various study parameters utilized in this report. Although a full explanation of the study methodologies is included in the text of the report, this summary can serve as a useful reference for reviewers. DEVELOPER: SAMSEL PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT SIZE/TYPE: 44,000 s.f. Office Park APPLICATIONS: South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission DESIGN YEAR: 1992 BACKGROUND GROWTH FACTOR: 3% OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC INCLUDED: South Windsor School Facility Plaza at Buckland Hills Gerber Scientific Buckland Hills Development Partners Buckland Hills Mixed Use Pavilions at Buckland Hills Town Shopping Center TRAFFIC COUNTS: Turning movement counts - Jan. , 1991 (F&O) Machine counts 12/81, 10/83, 3/87, 6/90 (ConnDOT) PEAK HOURS ANALYZED: A.M. Peak Hour - 7:15 to 8: 15 A.M. P.M. Peak Hour - 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. TRIP GENERATION: Based on ITE's Trip Generation ( 1987 ) (L.U.C. 750) A.M. Peak Hour - 112 Trips P.M. Peak hour - 107 Trips CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Technique: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Execution: HCS Version 1.5 i DWO0212B91/87-546 A. INTRODUCTION Samsel Properties has proposed the construction of Clark Corners, a 44,000 square foot office park. Clark Corners is located in South Windsor, east of Clark Street and south of Ellington Road, as shown in Figure No. 1 of Appendix B. Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. has been retained to study the traffic impact of the proposed office park. This report has been prepared to document the findings of the study and is being submitted in support of an application for site plan approval, along with the supplemental information listed in the Table of Contents. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is bounded by Ellington Road to the north, Clark Street to the west, Deming Street to the south, and a stream to the east. Access to the site will be provided by a single driveway proposed to be located on Clark Street, approximately 625 feet south of its intersection with Ellington Road. Ellington Road is an east-west major street and is designated as State Route 30, from Route 5 to the "Five Corners" intersection. West of Clark Street, it is a two-lane, bi-directional roadway with a pavement width that varies from 22 feet to 30 feet. East of Clark Street, it widens to a four-lane roadway with a pavement width of 48 feet. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 35 mph eastbound and 40 mph westbound. 1 - DWO0212A91/87-546 Ellington Road forms an unsignalized "T" intersection with Clark Street. This intersection is currently being reconstructed and when completed a two-lane egress from Clark Street will be provided. East of the Clark Street intersection, Ellington Road forms a signalized intersection with the driveway to the Town Shopping Center. Further to the east Ellington Road, along with Sullivan Avenue, Buckland Road, and Oakland Road, form the "Five Corners" intersection. This intersection is slated for reconstruction beginning in 1991. The reconstruction will eliminate the northeast leg of Ellington Road as well as provide widening on the remaining approaches and an upgraded traffic signal. Clark Street is a north-south local road. It is a two-lane, bi-directional roadway and is currently being reconstructed to provide a uniform width of 30 feet. Deming Street is a east-west local roadway. It is a two-lane, bi-directional roadway approximately 20 feet in width. This road, along with Clark Street, provides a bypass around the "Five Corners" intersection for vehicles traveling between Buckland Road and Ellington Road. C. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC In order to determine the traffic impact of the proposed development on adjacent street traffic, representatives of Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. conducted manual turning movement counts in the vicinity of the site in January 1991. These counts were compared with previous counts conducted by the Connecticut D.O.T. over the past ten years. After reviewing 2 - DWo0212A91/87-546 and balancing the count data, the traffic volumes were projected to the 1992 design year using a peak hour growth factor of 3 percent per year to account for normal growth in the area. Inquiries were made to the State Traffic Commission (STC) and the Town of South Windsor concerning approved or pending developments (not yet operational) which may impact traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site. As a result of the inquiries, traffic from the following developments was added to the background volumes: 1. South Windsor School Facility 2. Plaza at Buckland Hills 3. Gerber Scientific 4. Buckland Hills Development Partners 5. Buckland Hills Mixed Use 6. Pavilions at Buckland Hills 7. Town Shopping Center Figure Nos. 3 and 4 show 1992 external traffic, which is defined as traffic that will exist prior to the expansion, and includes traffic from the above listed developments. The greatest traffic impact on the roadway network will occur during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, the periods when commuter trips are at their highest levels. The traffic counts indicate that the A.M. peak hour is 7:15 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. and the P.M. peak hour is 4:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. Therefore, these hours were subsequently analyzed. 3 - DWO0212A91/87-546 D. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Estimates of the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed development were made using the 1987 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation. This publication is a compilation of trip generation data for similar facilities and provides data for entering and exiting traffic, relative to the size of the development. Using the size of the development, the calculations yield the number of vehicles which can be expected to enter and exit the site during peak hours and on a daily basis. These generation volumes are summarized in Table No. 1 of Appendix A. A regional arrival/departure distribution for site generated traffic traveling to and from the proposed development, as shown in Figure No. 5, was developed by reviewing the existing traffic patterns. Using the arrival/departure distribution, site generated traffic was added to the roadway system with the results shown in Figure Nos. 6 and 7 of Appendix B. These volumes were then added to the external volumes to yield the combined peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure Nos. 8 and 9. Table No. 2 of Appendix A is a computer generated table which shows the traffic movements at all analyzed intersections. The movements are keyed to Figure No. 2 Traffic Movements" of Appendix B; existing, projected, and combined design year traffic volumes are presented in this table. 4 - DWO0212A91/87-546 E. ANALYSES 1. Intersection Capacity Analysis In discussing intersection capacity analyses, two terms are used to describe the operating condition of the road or intersection. These two terms are volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and level of service (LOS) . The volume to capacity ratio (v/c) is a ratio of the volume of traffic using an intersection to the total capacity of the intersection (the maximum number of vehicles that can utilize the intersection during an hour) . The v/c ratio can be used to describe the percentage of capacity utilized by a single intersection movement, a combination of movements, an entire intersection approach, or the intersection as a whole. As the v/c ratio approaches 1, the intersection nears capacity and it may become impossible to accommodate all the vehicles attempting to travel through the intersection. Level of service is a measure of the delay experienced by stopped vehicles at an intersection. Level of service is rated on a scale from A to F, with A describing a condition of very low delay (less than 5 seconds per vehicle) , and F describing a condition where delays will exceed 60 seconds per vehicle. Delay is described as a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Therefore, intersections with longer delay times are less acceptable to most drivers. 5 - DWo0212A91/87-546 Level of service is generally used to describe the operation (based on delay time) of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, while the v/c ratio is applied to signalized capacity analyses only. These definitions for v/c ratio and level of service, as well as the methodology for conducting signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses, are taken from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Special Report No. 209), published by the Transportation Research Board. Using the above referenced methodologies, A.M. and P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were conducted at the following intersections: 1. Clark Street/Site Drive 2. Ellington Road/Clark Street 3. Ellington Road/Town Shopping Center drive 4. Ellington Road/Sullivan Avenue/Oakland Road/Buckland Road Table No. 3 of Appendix A is a summary of the levels of service and v/c ratios calculated for the intersections analyzed in this study. Copies of the capacity analysis worksheets can be found in Appendices C and D. The Ellington Road/Clark Street intersection and the Ellington Road/Sullivan Avenue/Oakland Street/Buckland Road intersection were analyzed to take into account their final configuration after reconstruction. Since Clark Street is currently under construction and "Five Corners" soon will be, the subject development will 6 Dwo0212A91/87-546 most likely be built and occupied during or after the reconstruction of these intersections. Therefore, the traffic impact of this development was analyzed using the future geometric configurations of the roadway system. The capacity analysis indicates that the left turns from Clark Street to Ellington Road will experience LOS F. during both peak hours, under external and combined traffic conditions. However, the analysis technique does not take into account the artificial gaps in the Ellington Road traffic that will be created by the nearby traffic signal at the Town Shopping Center drive. These gaps should provide a greater number of opportunities for vehicles to turn left from Clark Street. Additionally, the improved operational characteristics of the former "Five Corners" intersection should lessen the number of vehicles using Deming Street and Clark Street as a bypass route and thereby decrease the number of vehicles turning left from Clark Street. These two factors should cause the left turns to operate at a better level of service than indicated by the capacity analysis. 2. Sight Distance Analysis Sight distances for the proposed site driveway will meet or exceed the required sight distances as set forth in ConnDOT's Guidelines for Highway Design January 1990) . The developer will ensure that these sight distances will be provided and maintained. 7 _ DWO0212A91/87-546 3. Accident Analysis Accident data for the past three years was obtained from the Connecticut Department of Transportation in order to determine if there is any significant incidence of accidents in the vicinity of the site. The only significant accident pattern observed was in the vicinity of the "Five Corners" intersection. The planned reconstruction of this intersection should reduce the accident experience at this location. F. CONCLUSIONS Based on the foregoing analyses, it is the professional opinion of Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. that (with the aforementioned improvements) the introduction of traffic generated by the proposed development will not disrupt the continuity of traffic flow on the adjacent roadway system. Roadway conditions will be sufficient to provide safe and efficient travel for the traffic in the area. 8 - Dwo0212A91/87-546 APPENDIX A TABLE NO. 1 Trip Generation Volumes Clark Corners South Windsor, Connecticut Office Park 44,000 s.f. ITE Land Use Code 750) A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR Enter 100 14 Exit 12 93 Total 112 107 Average weekday vehicle trip ends = 591 Calculated using methodology described in "Trip Generation" published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE) in 1987. DWO0212B91/87-546 nrr nABLENnu. A'•r• r.rr'r,rC,LA K GUnncnS nnrr+Ir rl•\1Rr n_, nn\ra rt••n+nr•T SOU. w1 RHO uucv'NK 11L'u I Rrnr \rr•nr nnr, UC3:ON tCtin = 177 5i11J1• YEAR = 17711 onnqi r RATE = 1.UvJu . 1 n.;i. fcAli, noun 1VV Y CASI 77u1nCn } 17% }aiiiC OC :nH;CG i^.!-ifft:, }! :7it }} TRAFFIC $Y CASJi11ia $ UCVELOWF- # CAIE.RNAv #--------------T------------#--------vile 1 la. kiJ Cfil inM"i'v CFi Intif'av C C;Cn:tt. CA:;:v } I i;!iL IRh{,r.:v YY i;\Nf'SL t i VJL T vu # Y;;L #$ lt} ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt 1 }$J $ U 715 7 $ 7 t$ t S67 } V lOG }} v± } s: } i6i7 } Lv C.d * V V } 1712 7. t 1 i #$ :,•J # V # G. Y :; .. T ii 4: * 1 y it717 laL } 434 } SV i T \ U t. i_ }! 1J }+ J r i30 r is - .. 1 ! ; }* 17 t.. G iC }T :u•s } V } 06 } Uv 7 t 7 }}S i; }} T- L•: L 7 Jai V :.V V L: 't L1: Y 11L $ J7: $ V T Gv v Y G #t y•:_% s# LL {! •Ji% } J 7 ! 7 v } y y E: y' t {J rr t} 7L f L4 }} 6 i tt i• r! av } G * tv t v ; T U Lr ! 1J }! i.J Y! w }} 77t 7 } V V '1U J } rt ra 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------}} f & 0 fnl.iid!CL; •1.1\ GI—v't0' f-}----1-R7-n7-1:--------tRt-Ti-r„l-cr-ar----}---------------------------------------------------------------TnMrr, #* i1-,LR #arrTr aRrncrnH/-I-J 6 r t Tn rr71::-. EXISTINGaraTrG * uc„cLuR,- } r T r nhrL }--------------t------------}-------- uu Nc-i :# MU'VEM,ENC: inrlr=:i # MENi # InMFf:1. # ciiicnTIN T teiii1io # fulH }# 'nN'rii ** f ----------## ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------t# i Rr• r r. •r r Ji #} LJO *i„ # L +1 Gv G G #*G: ** wv t 4 t v V 1•f 4l+ sty: T l'r 4C }r 3: }i J:; IJi LZZG:Fl• 17Ji ** JI: sw } -t7 } 7` } sue: * v V T is v } v fGv # .. L v G J i# Fs: ** :i * 177•J } 91 * w' t LC +M iLi ULFiC.+,i ft ff r.MI. PEAK rI IR fY if f tt t ENTER =i4 tf tt ff CXlt =U if ttt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tf f# a77: } utl7tn f :77L #Gltt OCiIItnMICU TRAFFIC #2 a77: ff rr--Ir r•: —+ ri wr rr r•innt-rl:, ft t iGti tn } ucvuur— t };;tr,fvn, t---------------------------#--------t# f mt.iYCm t TnM'r:L f Mttif f Inn.w f CrMtCn:vG T CA:t lnu i::tAL ## inr-rraL t# r i-f*t InMrr::. } t A VOLOLt Y }* f ----------?f -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #2 L }f v # v U f v 'r - v Lti' t iv y t 4 if 1G7vz V. 4 ff :G7 f o f I"IJ f :v 't T U t 4 it 2Y J 7 tt iJ7 t tr } f' t i 1:v v t is tt Y :l if Ili 2 4 t G:J Y U T l Y if Gaw t# f :i tt li t V t lvL f v 2 t`r t 717 # T V tY f i ti 40 } G t 41 t isr i T u o f i iG: rt v 1 v 73 fit.)V t tt JJl rt t •G Yr avG f ila # v V :J i t 7 22 aL• f? J, t t; T GL Gv t G: tt i44 ft 7,i t v Lr T i 1 f 1 v t?vy f? r— r r•r r2aitttJ7tG t G.a v L T GJ GV t Gt; tt Gut }t 74 w t w # i4_3 # •i c? >t L., }tom t t« } C:. 7 T t 7 t!f:'t t} Y f iJ 7Y t Gv 7 tr Y 7 ##Jti ft t .: tY i i t i7 } 7:, } ti: T •. , t tt 7G tt 2 G fY :•:'f Y GL t 1G' f t JOG # : ;; 'fv :t t ti•i tY ti t 4%3 t 24 t ti L.} tt 47Z* t} f7t r r;—r ? U- r u.;-:-i NInj o7-:46: aLt NK'tit: ..LAnN7. t} t • nn• ui } n,n }r._E nra._.,T—n T' - -- if1y7:uii'It^ i77: alsc atrttnNstu {1Nr:v EXTERNALCIIF{NL }"__"—T______T--__T___TT_T}--------jr} 4YC Cii1 iilHi'1L mCiY i(1Hi':v C;17C1:i] T CA:ilila i FA;L I ...L VI } Y iL }} f} ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l 30 f} J'1 t GU t 110, } U T V V } V E}aiG }t f 3i fa GaU f 117 f03 tt L,)G } lr } LY } V 'J T it 17.: t# v L }N4 f 77G f V V V V t} 7t} f } (C'F i tYl% f lU'FG } Yv G T _r t: } 0 f} 1V;.j #* 76 Vt r t Y•. }f ;7 x T L } :; tj T i t ; tit u tvvw• ii::. Gi—.tG F.i_C for?` ;.AN i TABLE NO. 3 Level of Service Summary Clark Corners South Windsor, Connecticut 1992 A.M. 1992 P.M. INTERSECTION EXTERNAL COMBINED EXTERNAL COMBINED a. Clark St./Site Drive A A b. Ellington Rd./Clark St. A/F A/F C/F D/F C. Ellington Rd./Town Shopping Ctr. B/0.53 B/0.57 B/0.69 C/0.76 d. Ellington Rd./Sullivan Ave./ Oakland Rd./Buckland Rd. C/0.66 C/0.69 C/0.77 C/0.80 DWo0212C91/87-546 APPENDIX B CIA MEM'y O I N veRs TM se so oo BOACr I 1a[ ARK q T c SAID Tal R A r fACll • \ i O V a c 1 N V AIIIIII CIA ELL P 4 wG tit 0 M4 z SITE r F p I i G tc! i a r Kur AVENLN FIGURE NO.I v am" ST MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT CA e SITE LOCATION MAP 1 CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT M rol No. 87-546 DATE-JAN. 1991 cMtCKID @y:Dv/0 JOSEPH MERRITT i CO. M 1 42 41 *-43 1 Lw r-40 BUCKLAND STREET r t N in In 1 N N 26 4.--2T 1 25 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER tr N 1 N SITE in In 11 17 N 16 f--18 1 lr -4 '6 C LAR K STREET Tr T t N FIGURE NO. 2 foMANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS W SEE TABLE NQ 2, APPENDIX A t` c CLARK CORNERS ac SOUTH WINDSOR CONNIE TICUT NOT TO SCALE PROS•NO.8T-546 GATE JAN.1991 CHECKED er'y1p 0 1 t— 19ginW--651 --T11 aj1 L r-41 BUCKLAND STREET 3os Altr 0 m 1 ti a' t 23 *--55 32 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER ro N ol SITE 40 0 1 1 t-30 l--168 t'0 *-168 STREETLor138CLARKi -168 0 132 0-1 132-- ago I FIGURE NO. 3 1992 A.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES W 1- 0 CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT NOT TO SCALE DATE JAIL 1991 CHECKED BYO" 0 in Oi 1 t-10 9 a N* r969 4---1172 1 Lo r'`4 BUCKLAND STREET 40 P a v 1 t--169 4---2 67 1 • r-98 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER N m 1 Oi 1A S I TE 0 o 83 co 1 1 112 -195 J -193 4--195LoCLARK STREETj t ro 0-± a a 14 3--a 14 3-- oo*- I a FIGURE' NO. 4 F FLISSM)TAIMLOrANCNESTEA. COMMECTICtJT 1992 P.M. PEAK HOUR W EXTERNAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES f` o CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT o NOT TO SCALE POW.NO.9T-546 DATE JAK 1991 CHECKED /Y 25% 25% BUCKLAND STREET TOWN SHOPPING CENTER 65% 65% L.-S 100°i6 10096 7 5 96 25% 4-- - C LAR K STREET 5% 25% 10% 10% FIGURE NO. 5 Loca MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 0 ARRIVAL/ DEPARTURE W DISTRIBUTION 00CLARK CORNERS WINDSOR CTICUTNOTTOSCALE6T-54C DATE: JAIL 1"l CHECKED •1'b1Av, t! N 1 a a r- -- aj I L. r' BUCKLAND STREET 1 Al1r v lops a e a n to j TOWN SHOPPING CENTER r o t e SITE N to — ob on t25 1 9 C LAR K Zs STREET 75-t o T y O FIGURE NO. 6 AMCMESTER. CONNECTICUT A.M. PEAK HOUR W SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 00 CLARK CORNERS ac SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT P c NOT TO SCALE IRO .R •87-546 DATE JAN.1991 CHECKED BY m O 1 agin t-- 19 In a r-631 4--711 a 1 r"41 BUCKLAND STREET illillillillillllllllIll Al 11* N N at 0 0 0 1 ti 01 L 23 f--55j - i-32 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER rw 1 g a SITE N OD 1 O ti = t-38 0 L s--193139 ~ ITT C LAR K 68 STREET Tr75Olin2OT -0132 — as in I FIGURE NO. 8 5OMANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT 1992 A.M. PEAK HOUR J_ w COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES o CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WI NDSOR C N NECT ICUT NOT TO SCALE 'ROd•NO.8T-546 DATE JAN.1991 CHECKED a 1 t-109 N N r969 6--1172 l 94 BUCKLAND STREET not Owe a 1. m oa l t-1619 *-- 267L* r-98 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER T so t g SITE to N 1 Ion t-144 1-- ti N L 4 j L --121 263 C LAR K J L -195 4- 199 STREET tf 11 in in 154— 143—* o t ao o+ FIGURE NO. 9 f CONNECTICUT i 1992 P.M. PEAK HOUR W COMBL NED TRAFFIC VOLUMES o' CLARK CORNERS SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT c NOT TO SCALE ROJ-NO.8T-546 GATE JAN.1991 CMECKEO BY APPENDIX C 148_j HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION A`JERAGE RUNNING SPEED., MAJOR STREE-i". . 't=: PEAF:: HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME OF THE EAi:?-i WE.'Sl" S"!-Rcr_E--T. . . . . . . . . CLARP" C r iE.Fi'Ey TJ i NAME O, THE NDRTH ColjT„ STF'EET. . . . . . . CLARI-:' S-;- NAME OF THE ANALYE1T. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . FUSS 4: O!NE ILL, INC. — DWO DATE O[- f 1•l 1-1 N A L T .a.:.. t mfTf! d.» 7'i a r t_.._ LI—. ."f 1 TIME PE!'.J L,.rD ANIALY-Z E_u o 0 0 . r . e r 1 i f i, OTHER' I,FOIF-J-{PT I ON. . . . C:OMD..I NET."' TR F-E I C CC a Ah.i.:,"! 1.I4 i it_}C: iLily I s { r11yL t_• N RIOL I NTEF-;LE!:T I ON TYPE: T--I NTERSECT I ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC: ',VOLUME`1 E_ W F' N E C TL r f t' THRU R I G HT LA,NEC i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURE-( RADIUS (f t) ACCELLERAT I CIN LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TUR;uS EA STDOUND ------ WESTBOUND ou 90 H NORTHBOUi',3 t,, t:,t:z 9i i i N SOUTHBOUND c). i)c1, fit_; i•ti V E H I CLE COMPO',I-10N 2I_IONTFUCI:::S C f r i i I V r u, T r, r-' r-• 1-'yr•'TL;0Ut'y WESTB0UNT, NORTH B.0U3`i ci 7—R I T I CAL Gh1F''_7 TABULAR Ai_UES ADD U fEL. SIGHT Tab 1 tr 1(_ ,2) VALUE AL' USTME NT CF,i? I,:r`I._ CAF' t•'i r t OR 3TS. WB 5j. 5,0 Q. r C, , r—FT'r' M I NO LEr T'3 E IDEN TIF','ING INFOR TICP,' r r nS,-,-:'W>!r"' fF,,1, E-r Cs r, '! NAME OF THE NORTH/SOL'T1-i STREET. . . . CaLAFiF.• ST Dt TC_ Ar T i w1E C3=- THi= A3'di=L'f'S I=. . . . t-'y'._15-1^c'i g 1=?' _ At=sr F'E"'4-. OTHER' I t1;>~.;3" '!AT I r r . r . COMBINED TFiAFF I', C 1 tih1 CAFACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN-ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M MINOR STREET WB LEFT 3 569 541 541 7 A RIGHT 10 910 910 910 90 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 83 986 986 986 n 4 A I D EN YIN JRM TIO NAME OF THE EAST/WEST TREE T. . . . . . CLA ERS Dr. NAME OF r'E NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . CLAP CS T D TE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 02-15-1991 ; 199 AM PEA| OTHER INFORMATION. . . . COMBINE RAFFIC CC AMC 1985 HCM: UNS I GNAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS Pay IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AV E Pi'l, ._. IRLi N11 1 NG S P E E J 9 rIh•iti..OFF J T 'tE" t 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 M E Ci F TPA,,: t=rl.__T;''W E_:L..ti-1 S s FfE.E 7. . . . . . . . ROUTE _,,(_) NA F •—+f' F',:_ r Oy'. F ,: — . .. , } BE ET. . . . . i.__AF: r ME:_ C 1 HE_ r,NF.I—YE31. . . . . FUSE r NE:_1 L.i._.9 r••; : :_ of i { _ ANALKEDIS (stlf r'd ; ;I`t'. . . . . . . y--107 1 T I i!E PERIOD E-'NA!_YZEi;. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i`':?`r'__' AM PEA OTHER 1 NF Js`='C'A! ION. . . . E_ TE_RNi-- L TFROFFTC INTERSEC IO,'.I TYi=•'c_ ANI) CONTROL L 4 1.7_ J c ur I ON TYPE: T- I 1417FJ L_C T 1 ED MA 0hi ,3 T FT—.E , 1)1 R E C T 1 t..as ti. EA Z5i ;1 W E S i ti. - 1 : F'E 140F;T111.:3 JNI): S s ED F' _}I r;Fr-4 r U M L.E F i i Es Z l r A y.i r•O F L. F tyL'- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Faye— PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURES RADIUS fft? ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNIS FOR R I rF;T TURN"Ej EASTBOUND o. t._)t_:9t=) WESTBOUND t_). On 9 t_i N NORTHBOUND 0 9t_i SOUTHBOUND ------ VEi-i I C LE COMF,OS I T 1:ON SU TRUCh:::S % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND C) WESTBOl ND NORTHIBOUP,40 tD SOUTHBOUND C".R I T I CAL :OAF'S A,,—,.'. s i s L S r -rE T y7- c ti rTr'-L i11- v HL_"E A1.T J i ED i! I L' v L N ' L f Tau e I-L t„'ALUE AA.JI;TI`'IEhdT C :I T I Ci-li_ SAF' P MAJC L E FT WB 5. t-) h' O .' LEFTS=, I DEN-11 I F•Y 1 N C:33 I NFORMAT I ON NAME Oi:_' THE EAS•*r,'WEST "_I i%'EE"i . . . . . . C0 U I E t=? NAME OF THEM i`.fOF' :.'SOL'TFi L,?",__T. . . . Cl-a` ST DATE AND TIME O','_ THE ANALYSIS. . . . . ti;'_I i)--199 I s 19 9: Ahi OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXTERNAL TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE Page-3 F'OTEN--ACTUAL FLOW_. T I AL MOVEMENT SHAFTED RESE-RVE RATE CAPACITY CAF'AC I T`r'CAF'AC I TY C;F'i=i;r I T Y MOVEMENT v ipcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = C - v L D s R Nil S F; S HI MINOR STREET NF, LEFT i y 1.OC) 144 a F R I>>HT 3 644 6-44 1 1 A MAJOR Sa-BEET I U T I F Y I Cjr- I NFOR SA T I O NAhi_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . ROUTE 3c IAi`'!E:' OF TL.41E.. '••ORTH./S U-7i•4 STREET. . . . CLARP:. S LATE AND T I t°;L OF THE. ANAL.Y S I'_,. . . . . t; - 15--- 1 75 i R i:' AC,'i F'EA . OTHER; i C4F-OF.CA T I ;C(. . . . E;'TERNAL TFTA"F*I G 1985 HCM UNS I GNAL I EEC INTERSECTIONS Fare 4-df•######•4•if••lF••4•#•••#•34 k•#''f#####•if•##•f•###•E•4#4E•it•if••E•#f••F••3t•l4•••a'.•if••!f•#•94•#at•it•••?•••f-#if-#i4•if•#-• I DENT I F Y I Psi I IMF=ORMAT I ON AVERAGE RUNklING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. 4+ F'EAF: HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5t:r-)c_a NAM E. OF THE EA^-T•,'WEST S:TRE?' r- ( rr f -r I ! 07lciICL hhA C L-iC • R I . . . . . . . NAME OF TFAE: AN()LYr T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FUSS & O'NE ILL, -1 1N!:'„ DATE 017 TI ir._ Al 41A1._Y S I aiif" r li `'i'i . . . . . . %,_ 1 J.... 1 .} 1 TIME PERIOD A'NALYLEEr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 Ai'i r'LE OTHER C!i iL;I r;f:_i`r T F;t iF'-t-I r INTER'=,E CT -1C. TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T—.I NTEFti-,E"CT I ON DR _STREET r,I REC I GI`d o Ert•: i :tWEST LEFT r-Urrs F-I_ NUMBt—r• IDF :%s:r— LANE'u s ADJUSTMENT FACTORS a.g -'^ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS (f t) ACCELER,*,T i.0r LANE. GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNED'FOR RI GHT TURrAS EASTBOUND y, iac:;90 IN ha WESTBOUND y, cisi 9 y i NORTHBOUND c;. 90 SOUTHBOUp:[D _..____. VEHICLE COMF'OID I T I ON io S I TRUCI-."23 COME;I NAT. I ON AND Ir"'V S VEH I CLEF M 0 T 0 RIC`f C LE•G' EASTBOUND C) W ES,TB0)Ur'D C-) NORTHBOUND C) i) S0UTHB'-J:- ri !J i r !-z-.-!-1 J-r F1,14 r Table 1 t}- ) VALUE_ T!IE:NT CF:I T f--;r;i_. GAIF M I r•a.,Dr,. R I GHT,, MAJOIF% LEFTS MINOR LE=TS I DENT I FyT I rJ I by FOF;M T 10!'114* NA IE 0E- H STREET. . . . . . 'S:'DU 1 NAME ,)F T='iE r.I t';- ti. '!i_i-'',-, c-,"REE-T. . . . C!_ARf:: ST DATE AND TIME 01F THE ANAL`r`S I S. . . . . (}C--1 0--1 9 7 1 ; 1 9'-'- AC'; F-L-t-11 0-1 HEF' I h•1F,!-F MAT 701\41. . . . COS`B I NELi TRAFFIC cc CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE Page-3 POTEN—ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAFAC`J.TY C AF'AC I TY CAFAC i TY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c -- ,; L.OS p MINOR STREET N L. LEFT J. r. _y J.•=-4 1 1 s r" RIGHT 4 2 639 6.-9 i H MA1.3'-"R ST EET WB LEFT r A In Y I raGF I Or:rrrF NAME Ot= THE EH-"ST/WEST STREET. . . . . . ROUTE 3C. NAME OF THE NORTHiSOUI-w STRr E T DATE: ANTD TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . c_-2-15—19':,- 19`r,•:: AM PE A 1,.. OTHER INFO}:MAT )ra. . . . O FUSS&O NE[LL= PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PRO. oorL< Itirg engines BY BY Awl30 ® /o w.c! Sfi v, G SHE I. INTERSECTION.-GEOMETRY.a VOLUMES 7Z7 60 10 I I' 13' 3S 1 (f 3 2 Z 3 IT' rtI T S 2. SIGNAL PHASING I 2 3 4 f ale— Tr 3 Tom-31 o G zo C yGLs LC vvr a = goo Glaaayc /J3 LTF-r4 0.95 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION- ROUTE 3{'/TOWN SHOPPING CTR EA TYPE. . . . . OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . . FUSS& O'NEILL, INC. - DWO DATE. . . . . . . . . . 02-15-1991 TIME. . . . . . . . . . 1992 AM PEAK HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . . EXTERNAL TRAFFIC C05AMEX VOLi|MES GEOMETRY EB WB NF SB : EB WE-1 NB SB LT 0 90 32 0 : T 11 . 0 L 11 . 0 L 12. {. 12. 0 TH 357 727, 0 0 : F 13. 0 T 13. 9 R 2. 12. 0 RT 35- 0 23 0 : 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 RR 0 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. Q 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 2. 0 ADJUSTMENT FAC ]RS GRADE HV AD'J P| G BUSE5 PHF PEDS PED. BUT. 47077. TYPE 51) W YIN Nm Nb min r EB 0. 00 LL. t)CN N 0 WB 0. 00 4. 00 D. O8 cl 11 . 7 NB 0. 00 4. 00 N 88 0 SED 0. 00 4. 0''W C cl 0. 88 0 N 19. 8 3 S GNAL SETTINGS CY[LE LENGTH PH PH PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-:1 PH-4 EB LT N,B L7- 7K X TK FT X RT x PD PD WD LT X X SB LT TH X TH FYI- F-:- PD P1--) LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE ern. V/1: G 'C DELAY LO1:APP. DE|-AY APP. EB T 0. 39 s 0. 6O0 8. 1 B 7. 9 B R C. 03 0. 600 6. 24 B WB L 0. 000 0. 700 3. 7 A 5. 6 D. T 65 0. '} 5. 8 B NB L 0. 108 0. 200 4. 9 24. 8 C R 0. 08 0. 20 24 . 6 C INTERSE TIO. De/ = . 2 (sec/ek V/ = 0. O = P OFUSS&O NFaLL= PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT t, consuItirxj engineers BY BY GL,4 JAL•C.o?NFZi S 99Z A 1 it e oc? 3D v /o/it iNv Gi •- SHEET NO CAti16/Nc 710;0.4 rF/G- I of 2 I. INTERSECTION.'G EO M ETRY.a VOLUMES 79Z 90 f- 13' II' I!' I t' 3 2 Z 3 3.> NF 2. SIGNAL PHASING r 2 3 4 TT 31, TF 31 C YCLc LcN6Tr-! _ /OD s ATE: 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. . ROUTE 30/TOWN SHOPPING CTR AREA T Y PE. . . . . OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . . FUSS& O'NEILL, INC. - DWO DATE. . . . . . . . . . 02-15-1991 TIME. . . . . . . . . . 1992 AM PEA|( HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . . COMBINED TRAFFIC CC3AMCO VOLUME-S GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 90 32 0 : T 11 . 0 L 11 . 0 L 12. » 1 . 0 TH 365 792 R 13. 0 T12. 0 12. 0 RT 35 0 23 0 : 12. 0 12. 0 12. 12. 0 RR 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 1. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 AL,JUSTMENT FACT OF:S GRA E HV AD P G B 5E PHF PEDS pED. T. ARF.. Y/N Nm Nu mxn T E5 0. 00 4. 0o N 0 0 0. 88 4. 00 N NB 0. 00 4. 001. G 3 1`7. 6 3 SI NAL SETTINGS CyL LENGTI PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PFK-1 P EB LT TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WE-' LT X X F 7, RT LE EL CF SERVICE R 43 S WB L 00t- T 0. 708 0. 70C' 6. 6 B NB L C. 10 {'. 0 w . 4. 8 C R 0. 200 Lj INTERSECTIOw ve/ FUSS$c0'N PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO- BY2consLAf3f'vjr tiers BY e7-s4& Cl-4' K CCRAIMs 39Z -M SHEETNO. susjEcr: 30 ® JK.i.(.A tD u[.•/11SA n/ I Va 1 of Z LAN E Aoa sTED o Suw VMj kva' ai to1114 3Z1 Z ZSL 94 l Z r l 5sage-Z 17Z ZTe 30 LitIt' 4Af I IZT 6 30 70 . 7/3 l d • 9¢ 1 38 li I 41 !vs 1 r q IIZ s' 14 2 Se. K X A Y-Tow Y.t, X-tIV X- Ta' TLT 7 LT S SKt ano•+ SATURATION FLOW AD ORKSHEET FLOW UNE CROUPS AD FACTORS p 0 O O O O O O ® ® ® ®'L Ldt Appc I„tie ideal Na of t e+e Heap) eta& Ph6. &a Area T TSatLinesWdth1ehwn Rate Mv w Flow N f f E f Em0a i t a 9-5 9.4 9-794 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 «) EB 800 98 i I 1 0 boo Z /03 16 1 I ,9 / 3 3 9 w3 Bov Z 1,o3 pe Ag Z /.a3 a goo l 98 i l 9 i i sa V3 "8 l I I l 113(,L4j. i FUSSSOaNSLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. OOr enjr>ee"S BY BY Z I g-q R7 5-' svalEcr: c ,cam Cry? e.s 19Z tsrNO. D 1 iC l S(/GG/(/A 6% X T?N A L L 2.°f L 3.fJ f' LANEP A AD F ov/ cRmcA U oP y C r--T SAT. A+fSIS ouP ASE FLOW FLOW RAT10 F owS /C A?•JT I t • 0 6 07 ,Zs2 n •6 G to!1 40 z Z 3 379 .080 3 / 0 53 YW43fl277ZT9 .ZZS .345 1KiL .GGZ 7 07.[. G•5 7 I 1 7 c.3 36 /eo 7` .052 TER.S6GTON Qo2 IACo .Gv3 DEt-AY= '9a d S G8 3 34 .211 L o s = G Fh* seaond'Il rmmw Lbtal is iAs s.c+ O ® O O _ O O O 4 4 Lane v/c Germ C cle Delay Lane Delay Progresim Lane Lane App Geoap Ratio Ratio Length d, CIMT d: Factor CamW Croup Delay LOSimove- X SIC C (sec/veh) Cgmdty (sec/veh) PF Delay Los (sec/veN Table eeee s Sec) c Table 9-13 (set/veh) Table 94 p,) x 94 113 go eB aB ZSL •511 00 poi' Ito /v76 O o 3 . 810 39 00 Z9,Z Z 3 3 0.13 Zg 3Z e^00 WG G&Z .34r /00 Z 1. 13 Gc. N ` •07 •039 /00 3(o- ue 00 a I.-s C 00 1 5u .30Z /0 23.0 /0 7 0,u ,9 Z 1.!0 9 G Sa c. .U5-4 W 31•lo 3 Zip4,b4 / 7- /00 /g.53 14 o, 1 2 5s. as i fFUSS80WPREPAREDDATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT l'm tiru.1'1C'jt' ers BY BYOo hwo Z 9-ql E87--s4& SUSJECr-- CL ARK CCRAlEXs AAAr SHEETI 30 ® axz LAND:RID 1,5 au-i WA/-.ANrs" CQ/'1f ic/tom ,AF'1L f f LANE T X s Avaysr" Vaw•yc LA MVi F SW.t.i,M IWs 3zi' 2 2 s 9 . V l 2-x 6/ A99 I3o , { 4 ,s• _• 430 r r i 5-5 q4 2 5 f q¢ iZTE 30 E 441L 44 ZTE 913 0/ tf- ,z i' K' 14 Z 950 q4 z 2. X N X. t,.x Y OW I.tV- Y.t& Y,-Fa. Y,tLT }LTt,- = S s SATURAnON FLOW ADJUSTMENT wORKSHEEr FL `d LANE CROUPS AD FAC.`TM O O O OO O O 4 ® ® ® Adl®+c Lane Ideal NaL of H,ss Area It idt FlowwPP Grasp Sat Lanes Width eh Cade Tyr =nen f Rate Morenw+es Flow i i ( om) N rpbs) 9-S 9 9a 9-6 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 ov I yg - l /I I • S /G Soo 98 800 z 03 .18 r 1J ,q4 / 341(o w3 0o0 f Boo Z 1.03 .98 I l > > •94 /4 Na 800 9s I •9 / pe eve a 4f 800 Z a3 j$ i / I l l yr34 Boo / 000 /98 113 I EI PREPAREDIrma ,DATE CHECKED DATE ?P OJECT NO. BY BY r B7 AWL SMT No. susJEcr: Y 4 e C'l3/N 2,407Z f 2 of z PMSI04 ; J r t 1 l SAT FAH/ cRmc C-Rop V I S1 ENE NAsE ADS. LOW RATIa -owS U/C A C s yRo p F,.aw 03 z(o 3411, ,081 311, 074 de L .O 5 1 w1+3 s z 799 3411, 234 llc.l 1 t,8t 1 • 1r ozlo .0 8 v4 713 3 314 1141 32 221 T L o s = G Font arm Sewnd'ILrm TaW Une iAS 4.tErtL o OF SsdWd O ® O O - O O O O O Commmww/c Cyde Delay Cup Delay tee iAne AppLM A6 Gmup Ratio Ratio Lgr4&d2 Factor Group GroW Delay 1Koulr X C (sw/vch) Capacity (sec/veh) PF Delay LO S (eec/VdQ Mdk c Tabk 9-I3 (set/vcW We 91 vph) X 91 1? l 9 U 9 391 aZ 3.7 e3l _;00 z3 49 es 252 ,3/L o 11.34 lo7l 0,p3Co Ito, MA ILL r. , Z .l 37 z q,3 3 Z30 A• (4 1 Z9.41 3 L wo 88 1 1340 /00 Z r.10 i ill, /.z Z I ZZ•SZ b5 .038 /00 3&-d !,4 1, 9-5 I c3,oC, E N8 Gz .3r4 OD ZZ.z3 //4 0,wv OZ 1 fl./32 3.77 1 L 9i Z7 0i G lgls 3 140 APPENDIX D 1985 HCh l: UNS I tul` AL I Z ED I N 31 EI .SEC T •_3 Pa.,-e-- i. it it it it it#44 if•if is it it 4141 if*it 40 it A 146 it.4*_xt.0:.j 0-.ti r...C. .#.:. .s,_X -Y. X. 'A. I-_x x_X iL..y 4-t+,-9#l6•?:-k 0 4. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION r,AVERAGE F r. I i h , rr- STREET. . 7 C) PEAK HOUR Fir AA a . . . . a a a a . P . . a n 1 A i E A r-'3{ Ul.__A. 7 I 0N. . P . a n n u u u . . . a . . . . . 2 L s s...._ 4 i . 4 pi i.:_ pi a rR i-un, _7'_.!!.._! , F4 ,_, AN,% . . . . . . _,_A re.+ S r1 PI E 0 — T r-3__ FA WA L i •._! s . . . . a a . s. . . P . a . . u !AT s i•a i....J —....... , .LI!. . _..——_. D A 7 i:- OF- T F'i!_ A N`-L T+_.+1 S k IIn+ dlr.: T P1E 11 C a.: to K!11L 1Y Cr a n a • e s a . e . o e a a . . . J.'—. _._1 ... _.. i i IEr's F'—!:+si:+. ,31',i >. s s i—•,r!T'T TRAFFIC.RFT — I NFERSECT I CIN TYPE ANT_ _ :•+W' +_- Jr h iT r 'SEi1T 3.r -„1 T4.•F,E- -r_ , —c,r!-+_'7•,•+-!i. i T f _'L. _ :i r 5 r- - ^- A EEB IQ FFI rF Sr! s 1F_7 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT' RIGHT T_R r 4 L_•JF!s: _.r•i L y'_'S 4't ) p!_1...ET L_.E-_ 'tI L 14 E EINE,T B 0Ukill) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBD!IND i 90 r W E:- E;-,'...t';, TAB._=L_14F Vf-iL_ iL•3 Az_!t_ ..J•— i !::_i.. 3 c3.. 1) L 13 T. F +, - t. to b 1 __ 1 v`A!L_L!i._ L r'.1-, a A L I i ce:•_ E'+T Gri' 12 L l=Er'.,T l F x ra,-: I r'•aF--'F f IY1? r•, '1: -r r t,f_ , r -)-, r- Ai,t:r. t C . . 0,1—i! -- Q - - r,,.,= r-.,_ T 11 L.R 3.14 IW 0 f I44 1 .L `I. . . .. _r 1 L'1 r d._f) iTRAFFICI__: L.•C I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF—SERVICE F=-,.--k i e-_r Pc?-rLr -ACTti A._. F L.C3W-- T]:AL MOVEr'IEWT SHAFTED FRE,SE-RV _. F A T E I!A F 0)Cl T Y l._by F`1)C I T' C 04Pit I_: Y Cto FT 0) T 1.' PICIV Ell E:PAT V (pcph i C (pcph 7 c (P)C—pl 1 C tP3c1311 7 c c- - L.0 Es FP r., i FR _ P!I N 0 FR STF;Li_-I W B L_.1._F"1 2•D 591, L 1 •... Fi Z C3 R C 1-r.r-'-•T 1 DEA:-7 1 1.__. T h 1."' 1-4 0{-,hf, •T T Cl ti 1'-H: 11.""_ OF { HE E h•)_H-it W •_1 S 1R1:::' . . .i_..h•' I._._!i'•'•N.... ...= L F'• NAM:M: OF . CIE= N'_'R M _. _'L TH S f FI ZE_T. . . . I_.ti!; r:•-, i.r•4 1 1\• ". win11•_ c 1.• v i• r., `i S' _ j ... r' •A Li h 1 ,..,I F CD r:1 I r'1 1 _..1 coin mL i) vwuw i cc I_;L r, A 7e.5 RCM: UI--iS1GNAL] ZED INTERSECTIONSLt`'..SECT101•3S r,_ ig!- it it 44 it*it 4?•?t_*-A?4 9f 3t I-art•art it 41 it#*A it it A it•it it- •fit 4145 iF 34 1.if it it 3t•fit•3F X.-if•?(at•fit •0_x•#C• •x 0 -x-g -n_x -X z nF_r,T T FY T NG I NFORPAT I OI,,:i AI'\ESA , '!_!' .U!....t—; , 1:_, . . . . . v • . r . . . . • • . 1_5{-1 0 I1)01E 0E— 17t F;E 1'.:=' f .`I:dE:-10 : S I RE.E 1.. . . . . . . . . RC3 Li T E ._,i_, i't=? +._II ! ! 1E_ At41)!_ T .. 1 dd p , . . . . . . 02 i_! ! , s !L. 1' ,'..'_ _''-1 1!.!1..: A. 1-i.y L.. L'.:n. ,: :, . . . . . u . u . 1 I`:'.. IF !••;!...I f W :FR St_!,T i 0!N T Y! C_e s N-F E.:R:,t_' I i I_'i I_.,t-;f. _MW E "'";-t Y&;-f r.W. T T t C_, ,-' -!ii•J E rJar112E.T: C3F7 i,A14 'W ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 F'ERCEN11- RIGHT TURN CURB, RAE,I U.S* t f t? ACCELERATION LANE GRADE 14NGL_E FDF Fi I G!---iT TURNS FOR F1 1 GI'-; UmNs-L WEST DOU1,lad SOU nip_ -•1 ,1. ,- VEHICLE C OMPOS I T I Ci•; it S._ TFRLi C E•.S ir: CO, IE}I NP f f`•i r f`{: I t.=V '_J 4 L...,•i 1'....L_ES o pi i 0fj:C t '_.r ..`._ NORTHBOUND C Li El T. L'ir'I 4 aL:;1 =. I t.?-- '` A L.1_!E F+ -U 03 Al El!'•.IT C F':1 1-;.i._A .. ri r f!'d.. f _.'_ w .,:.,C' NAME. Or- =1_ E:t- 00777r _ 1 .. 7:7 LJ ! ... - - AT P" A h=' T T KE OFF 1-1 i r_ 5.!i•-1 OTHE:.ft•i,r-i at-=: ;, T,` E ,. -ER1',11AL TF ,:F:F I: C N!"14 tC i T +i• 1 4 14 1) L.L_t4 L.L..__11 F7.-.^E7 F {y`I C L_ Pa g F-, `Y i1 T L A L. PIC3 VEiPIEi N i L3H1)FiE=U RE=_DE..FT E.E_ F;t-;T E C:to,to C,I ; 'v` N,-'Ai.=I i •t•CCAPAZ I TY C A. A ?T• E . ramrr. _;r.i-1 -i THE; EA'.._ W,:. SO-7 :._T Ri.FT 1 . . . , . . F.71_.T!_. _. . NAME t;F= THE I'0F C%if ;;'I-A i_L Ei T t A El it,. ... "T Cl:", T L— 1..,i N L.y ti,7-=- . . . 0.. 154 n,A _ "NU P 11 _. Al i_ Fi._.., ii•l : :iY:..`', a.!—ji•,. . . . El E:r"'I'I`';_. . FRAFt yeti x 1?8" FICM d Ut IC I GNAL_ Z E.-D I NTEFRSECT I C3t,i F-_{q;,-:- a A- IDENTIFYING:; I NFORtU)T I ON aVER AS F- r-;L,N1,11 r4'-.. tilr'E-EE 1. , P1ANJ,_.1;•,. _, -. • E: i 4_ F' AK HOLin FI•-ft..+TCV;. • . . . . . . . eou 1 01RE1) F'JF"UL_A I r]i. . . . . . . . . f . . . . . . . . . . . ::.5 C)0•_' NH11E =_'.t= T;;E __A`_•;,/14F...S-r STF;E=ET . f . . . `Z,0Ul N1)P!E _ - THE t•,'riF'T H1 030004 ESTREF-•- . . . . . P C:._PAr-', _ N[-(.y -r•• +} /ram r, +..i.-'C' E fr_•-;• :: r••:-•r•, i •*+ ,f_'r' ;;_' 1 1 i 1 F 0r- T 1•E AN A L. 1 L f P f f u P P A b P 1 '-1:_!•_•f 1, i••_ •L._._L.L.q 1 1•y'—:P 1. :/•.1 1 1)- '-E,r5 THf_ ANAL_•1•S 1 E3 (ai!Ii;• Cj C:r/ y•y) . . . . . ()2'-1 r. r . T :i, ' C,'- + -+1) r , r Z r-i-•i CAPS?S? Fooli ,• r; 1 1 4_ 1 i. 1 _/... f•i i y r•i L. 1 L 1....... A O f Y P b f A P P n . / /.l... 1 1 ..At* 1t i .f IF-1 -CJi•.. . ., A T E F:`EECT I ON TYF='L._ AND PIT ET?SE.CI l N_.e -f—I NT EMENCT I CIN r 0.. , ,-.i_:L_ , F t(;THF;iiL 1t,ritl i is I 0 07 . .._ r _ _. ._ Y. r-b. will 1 r F' r_ . B 15 4 r 1,r_ 1 i .•r.t L 1.. ADJUETME!'' T FACTORS Fla - r T + -r f r'-r- r.n r 'E. r r 7;•. 4114 r--PEF CEN f + G11 l C L; FRAE)i LE. l f i_. C ,'=Lt_..i;A , 'r..;,•.: 1... 0 GF;A1)E,... 14NGL.E FOR F,I GHT TUFRIAC FOR R I C,-,,T T "RP:;S EASTBOUND 90 20- 4 WESTBOUND c-; 20 r— G.,-i4r_ is 44.ti J. :.._ f_ I 1 r4_3,? I—tl- ii r 1_I 77 r--•23-r• r, fr•-.- --r•1-r --I- 1 7•r- _- N1)PI El 0 F T;E: i+.}0R T H. E)0 L_T H 23 F'F. .._ . . . . Th F 1 7 '- D t j1 I AN1)1_. YI S 1 2 . . . .. . _ -2 -15 _ T ti 1 i 9 2 , 1 PEEF•'! OTHEM ,. WOR t.T I_;N. . . . !0r11_,1 riL_1' -F R 11; ry I r; cc_... Cr-jF'A'_,i T r AND LEVEL--011:7 3ER-, :i l'.E P....YEN....iCTUAL FLOW-- T I AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESEFRVE:: RATE 1:1A1=AC•i T•Y' CAPACITY CAPACITY CA PA C'T T't M0V'EI''{E.1`t1T v (:!rph) C c:pcph) r: t pcph' _ (prpfi) C: _= r_= MINOR SITIEFT MA_ 01•i E t rt1-1_T DENTNT I; `t I PVS I C;r:.OR i''ii=t T ON 17 ;_. Er{r! . .`r 1_ _ —' +;E L ! o . r r r rl— t;rl.._ OF ! r` . NGr'-Y•L-I !r:'}! !T - - -r-^!^ CLAW:1AC 1 DWI! A N'._ T I r 1 E•_ OF THET A N ri!. L:I.,r , r < < <._ :! ._. y 10 F%I.:i.:. . 1 r L.., .r h I r— .hi;__".'i 1 y r r-, a r^•i! t. 1 1 1' I.! . .R; . . 7 '-!I;r r u !_... .1 IF_'I N...rr ! IRA ,. _.. r '1 !'_ r JJOO PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECi' r,USS&O NEILL BY BYconsullting,engineers 8<AL c 4 X GoRN s 1910 PM K Nye SHEETNO 4 r I of 2 I INTERSECTION.-GEOMETRY.8 VOLUMES. 4 z f 7¢ 141 fit 131 1 S Z I -•- I I 1 ra Z, F = 0,97 2. SIGNAL PHASING 1 2 3 4 Tr 31 TF to Zv r Glu n L A13 i TF +a •95, 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Ak.******** INTERSECTION. . ROUTE 30/71 014N SHOPPING CTR AREA TYPE. . . . . OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . . FUSSto O'NEILL, INC. - DWCc, DATE. . . . . . . . . . 02-15-1991 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . 1992 PM PEA|' HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . . EXTERNAL TRAFFIC CC3PMEX VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NS SD : EL tiB NB 3 LT 0 14c'9S 0 : 7 11 . L 11 . 0 L 12.. [' 1:7. 0 TH 821 42 R 13. 0 T 1 F, z2. 0 12. cl RT 118 0 169 RR C. 12. 0 1. 0 1. O 12. 0 12. 0 1. { 12. 0 1:1. A.USTMEN- A TORS GRA1)[H%n ADJ P/.G BL`S3E9 PED57 PEQ. BUT. 14 A F?. TYpE 51) 511 Y/N for N Y/ E 0. 0C WB 0. 00 4. 00 N 0 0 0. 7 , 31- cl. 00 4. 0C;t 4 C 0 7, SIGNAL. SETTINGS VYCLE 004757 = 10C.. 0 PV 1 p11-2 FH-3 P14-u 7'' 4 E)D LT ND LT X TH X TH RT PTD PD W L-7 X 6E LT T X rH RT PD LEV'EL OF SEF,VICE LAN[ GRF C. OS 1;F'[ . 11E 1;\ B T 0. O:2W; 0. b 0 0 1 0 la D R 0. 17.1 A T 3 70 NB L R SC'1 0. 2}0 7NTERSEC7-:EO1.; l , / . 1 (per .en PARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECl' f,1 . USS&O NEiLL PREPARED BYcorLsJ1t1ngengineers GLA?K•Go 2N _ I912 PM w'C SHEET NO OUT .3D a 10 WA1 f //Vv / G'p/rJ/t / i,iF/G I of 2 i. INTERSECTION.'GEOMETRY.a VOLUMES s- 4 3 4 1411 11' to I NF = D,9 r2. SIGNAL PHASING i 2 3 4 IT 31 31Z IUDTL; L TL 1985 HCM: SISNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT X.- INTERSECTION— ROUTE 30/TOWN SHOPPING CTR AREA TYPE. . . . . OTHER ANALYST. . . . . . . FUSS& O'NEILL, INC. DATE. . . . . . . . . . 02-15-1991 TIME. . . . . . . . . . 1992 PM PEAK HOUR COMMENT. . . . . . . COMBINE TREAFFlC C0301CO VC UMES GEOMETRY EB WE NP SB : EB WB NB S LT 0 149 90 0 : T 1 0 L I L 12. [ 12. 0 TH 882 434 13. 0 T 17. 0 R 12. 0 12. 0 RT 11O 169 0 : 12. 0 12. 0 1:1. 0 12. 0 12. 0 2. ADJUSTMEr T FACTOR GFAADE I"V 0)10 P) C7 GW SES pHF PEE,11 pED. 8yT. Wp. 7 '1' 5;1 11) Y/t ps Nb Y/b, mi m T E15 Q . 6) 4 N 0 9 N 1 4 uZ. 0. 00 4. 00 N 7 N 97 SJGNAL SETTIN6S CV 7:1 E LE| 5:T K Q' . Pl-i-1 2 PH-3 P 4. FK ! PF-Q P1'' 77 P'i-4 EB L.T NB LT TKI TH FT X pT PD F'D RT PD LE EL F LOW S P. 11 'C fy/C 10[L1)Y LQ I V' 1, 77 y R 0. 1 y1 0. 600 6. 6 A D C. OX: 24 I|TER[ T 1O|': Delar = 1. 1 O = 13 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DAZE ,PROJECT NO. f1gineers BY BY v/p Z-l9-9/ CLA?K Cor?N S M9Z qC SHEET NO. SUBJECT: 1 L j of 3 LAw E x Aux srEb F LOB YowhE Lw M 4*7 zZo Z 5E q 93 f U 33 j140 4-5 11 2 44 ZTE it, 1166- 1) 4 13 it' IJ, I 243 93 - I r S—•4-73-6- 14ql,910q a• 14 Z 604- . 93 I gas 1/7z Jo- Y.-fxf Y-Trr Z—' 6 sgro n,W4 SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSIMENT WoORKSHEEr Fwow LANE GROM AD FAC'InRS p O O O O O O O ® ® Left ideal Na of Lane Weave Grade Pkg. &m Am TT Tom+ RatejAppr- W Sat Lanes Width 1kh F,, f E t f E f E E a N rPhB) 9•5 9-6 9a 9-8 9-9 9-10 94 9.12 s 80 o Z /.0,3 •98 / f I r .1 / :szs w3 r' Boo I .98 I l l I I i800 Pal tovo me Soo I •9g 1 I Igoo I z r.a3 56 to e ao l 98 / l r •9 /lam I FUSSBcOIIVEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY BY coro.ttf19 .r ers 9Z Am, 'Awe SHEET NO. sv 2•' S 1e40;*c 2 D C VL vvGG/1//A b XTEZN 4— 7-1 LANE 3.U!' APT SAT FLo w' CRITICAL Q U.RC 0 P V//C r .-.... •--r-- LANE U Ursa G.R,p tAs F1.o/ FLOW RATta Fi-ows C Ate`T r Z l 17 71i 4 1S'1 Z ..7 G G 3 3 3 5 L 5 .IBgv 3oiv 1071 Z 11 1 48i 3343 . 144 lP> IvZS .170 r 77(.0 3 4 P 41-5 .453 43 /SSG SSZ. DES-AY- 44; 8 G.s 3 ,Z 3v 1.o S = G Sewnd DtUy TAd Ddacmcowtos coop saws O 4 O O O O O O Lane Lie wpp` Lane r/c Ceeest Cede Detay GasQ Y Pam°" DekyL06 C"+ewp Ratio Ratio Length d= Fstba P ( sec/vdt) Tabk I o rr X a/C C (sec/veh) Capsdty (sec/veh) PF Y 9-imove- c Table 9-23 (set/veh) TAIL Vph) X 91 Zo Q 2S,.4 I8.3 7?Z .1e IOI z 3-4zA o,Z4 557 ,3ali Oo z 3 i 1079 17 G Z -8 Z k3ar. ,34 053 7 Cll.i3 w e"00 7770 ./S /00 1 Z S i sZ Jo 1 /00 C.10 /f 3 4.9 NB 1' .7 S 147.a 00 /8. 1} 14 9G /,f34 Z 7, G 2Z.4: Zol r sD ' .2s3 -tw ilk 41 S 0 r 7 L s Q 4,1, .s .431 /Ur p is 5kt. o 1 77,rl 3 9 Q LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET tt INPUT VARIABLES t NORTHBOUND t SOUTHBOUND if EASTBOUND t WESTBOUND #{ tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt CYCLE LENGTH C 100.00 t 100.00 } tt EFFECTIVE GREEN 9 t t 42. C': t 19.00 tt NUMBER OF LANES N # 1.00 t 1.00 } tt TOTAL APK FLOW RATE v(a) t 941.00 t 698.00 if if tt MAINLINE FLOW RATE vim? t t 836.00 t 525.00 t tt LEFT TURFY F;OW RATE V(LT) t t 101 oc t 171 oc t tt tt PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) t 0.11 } 0.25 tt t OPPOSING LANES N(0) t 2.00 t 2.00 tt tt OPPOSING FLOW RAIE v(0) t t 1159.00 it48!.0,0 It tt fitPROF LT IN OPP VC,- P(L7 0; t t 0.00 } 0.0f) t t tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt COMP'-'TAT I ONS t NORTHBOUND t SOUTHB?UND t EASTBOUND it WESTB:,jN.rl tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt SAT PLOW RATE, OP: S(n) t t 3600.00 t 360C. ,0 IF tt tt FLOW RATIO, OPF .,,,:. t t 0,32 t 0.11 t tt ttp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) t t 14.46 t 6.51 t t+ tt LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) t t 0.15 t 0.57 t tt p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) t t 0.11 t 0.25 t tt tt p/o GRh BLODAD 5 t it 27.54 t 12.49 t tt tt p/e T^ IN SHARE LN P(T; t t 0.E9 t 0.75 t tt tt INITIAL P-lo GRN t t 12.93 t 5.0! t tt tt TH EaviVALEN L) t t 7.47 t 1.96 t tt tt LT F:70RR? SHARED {f(m) t t 0.56 t 0.67 F(L t tt t LT FACTOR T) t it0.56 t On if t tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------t't F & 0 PR2 ='CT NUMBER 87-546 SHEET 3 OF 3 i Ira So PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. isating EP14neers BY BY Op CLA?K Cor?lJS q9Z /NIC SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Ic.,I4AAI A vk; ' 3//c ,L f 3 F716 LAM E Ftro Yap+•LA D5 3 suu.ivA* kva 93 13 Sqos Zge q3 C/ 8 3 14% 19' Is' Zz.-- 4l 7 r i 45 93 POP34e,75 Z Te dog— 4 73 c?/ IL' I TC 3c 079 93 q4 9 io9 c 2{3 93 zc V 1s• Is' 14 3 b-7 1 I 2 se X l x T 03 T0w x.. T3 X-TV x-4u VLTIM- YJW X.T I r S y r,,aan• SATURA37ION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET FLOW LANE GROUPS ADIUSIMENTFACInRS 0 O O O © O O O ® ® i0 Adj.5a` AM tAM deal tom of Go& 6- 7ype " qft Taea RFlaotw GrowS.t Lanes f f ftT Rs Flow f t E f f pq*W i) iJ vphB) 9-S 9-6 9.7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 ggggg ov 80o i 98 I 1 .G 9 /z Boo Z /03 98 I 9 ! 35Z w3 Ir Soo i 1 .y$ l I 1 9s (• r Boo Z /,03 ,98 I I .9Z l 3343 Ae Savo z11.P3 66 i800 98 i r •9 lU 7i! SA fe, I DATE CHECKED DATE (=Cr NO. WEILL PREPARED DA BYBY moo, r -.,,+_ - +mow^-;+f'• l.+rF ' G G Ii S 19Z /AIL SHEET NO. SUBJECT: C di ie Z,of. LANE 3•C tP, Apt: SAT FLOW atmcAL UIC p V/C 4-- LAMS r-- F1 owS Z° Ursa c-TRap ' F v! FLOW RATIa S MP ve G orb 3SzS .18 3Z II Z ' WIt3 t 2 4 S 3343dF-14s ,l8Z (off •qg Ole 4 12 eLAYc Z4D Q LZ /S3 'SL8 o S = G Sewad'IViLly tios o f saw[ O ® O O _ O O O ion [one t,ae e APPL Lam % Grew Cie Y IAne ' redw CAP Group Delay iA6 C Ratio Ratio L gth s Group PF Delay L06 (,«/ Table Move- X a/C C (sue/ ) P tY ('/ ) Table9-13 ( veh) Tabk 94 a K) c X 91 95 ,19Z Z .z. 3Z2 3 7> s i00 L9.,5Z aB 31 .32 0 Z 5-4- r13Z 0.; n NO 3-_17 q U•S 7 1 41.7.E E 151 /00 ZITS Uv8 5 f l 4 L 00 Z.31 115 c l S•3g Q`s 09 19.9..C NB fl-' 0 *,5 /0O 14-53 .L J r 6,43 /Vo 14.S z 403 D,C 7 1 t i. 9 c sQ 5L8 .4zy lbD b.7,..' Z';`' LEFT TARN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET f-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND } WESTBOUND }} ff CYCLE LENGTH C loc.00 f 100.00 f EFPECTIVE GREEN g 4L 00 f 2N 00 # If ff N0PER OF LANES N 1.00 it 1.00 if TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a; f 940.00 f 761.00 f ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f 840.00 f ` 9,00 LEFT TURN FLOk RATE v(LT) 101 oc f !BE cc PROPORTION OF LT P(LT)0.2 C.24 f IR OPFO3:N3 LANES N(0) f 2.0C 00 fit OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(L) f 115,(s * 4E5.00 ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff rrf ,,.TnT.n r`f r,lT r; `IrT.,;t n1MLiA71ON_ f NC;7r'BOUND f SOU+HBOUN. f EAS:L O.'N: f f" .'•, f*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------#F SA7 F-OW RATE, OPF S(op) 36 0",00 f 36:"'.0 3 FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o)0.32 * :1:.? ff f+R nT Wit', r f 1 iffP/o GRN N , BLCCi.t f G l'u) 1:.99 7.54 LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(,)i .i5 0.57 r r Ftir p 11 24 arc GRN RLO:KED g(q;28.01 12.46 ff ff r;c TH IN SHARE LP. P!T) f f C.89 f 0.76 fx ff INiTIA!, r'_ &jRN 0) f is 13,02 f 5,19 if ff r rf-':VALE T r( 4' 97ff1 CR_.v t 1. f L .. f ff ff LT F A^-TCR s SWARE 1 (M. f f 0.56 f 0.6? f ff It LT FACTOR f(l) f 0.56 f 0,6; f ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff r Oj :T U 51h{L F Jy"T 3 C 3 pow N aE'( C awn- 0-14?SOUIA ?d&,GJ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 060744wf sOR•co' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 13, 1991 John Samsel, Jr. Clark Corners Associates 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: Re: Application #90-80P, Clark Corners At the March 11, 1991 meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions Application 90-80P - IWA/CC permit for the construction of office buildings on property located on the southeast corner of Ellington Road, easterly side of Clark Street and northerly side of Deming Street, RC zone as shown on plans prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. , Project #87-546 dated August 30, 1988, revised December 14, 1990. 1 . Two blueprint copies of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission . This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. 2 . Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3 . The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4 . The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on March 11, 1992. 5 . All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6 . A contact person shall be identified directly on the plans . 7 . We recommend a' bond in the amount of $15,000.00 to be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. John Samsel, Jr. Page Two March 13, 1991 Application #90-80P B . There shall be a professional representative, who has expertise in wetland creation, available during the construction of the wetland enhancement. 9 . The detailed plan for the proposed foot bridge shall be included on the final plans. 10. The plan submitted for the long term maintenance of the 4 .86 acres of open space shall be included on the final plans. This shall be placed on the plot plan (sheet 3 of 10) to ensure that it gets filed with the Town Clerk. The final plans shall also indicate that the 4.86 acres of open space is to remain as open space and shall be maintained in accordance with the maintenance plan. 11 . Note #2, on sheet 5 of 10, shall be clarified to indicate, clean free draining material per DOT Form 814 and Section 2.1t of the South Windsor Inland Wetlands, Watercourses, and Conservation Regulations" . Very truly yours, tlizabeth A. Warren, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission EAW/pmm cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Marcia A.Banach, Director of Planning Planning & Zoning Commission r T 0 pSlo ?d&U146&te 1 U v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 l soe•co' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 17, 1991 Mr. John Samsel 125 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Application #91-10P, Clark Corners Site Plan Dear Mr. Samsel: Attached is a copy of comments from the Planning and Engineering Departments regarding the above-referenced application. Please make the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets to the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure, please contact me. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning cc: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer CLARK CORNERS SITE PLAN Planning Comments Key Map a. abutting property owner must be identified b. the open space shown on the key map must be shown to belong to either lot #1 or lot #2 (the way it appears now it is a separate parcel by itself making this a three lot subdivision) c. the zoning data block should reflect only figures relating to this specific site plan (it should not include lot #2 which is to be developed by others) L/d. the zoning data block should show a breakdown of parking indicating the square footages for the different uses proposed on the site (i.e. , office, banks, restaurants, medical facilities) 2 . Plot Plan a. abutting property owner must be shown on the adjacent site b. copies of the ZBA variances should be placed on the plans L--'c. the 50 foot buffer line should be shown from the streetline, not the front setback line (if you even want to show it at all in the areas where it was waived) 3 . Landscaping Plan tea. quantities of trees and shrubs to be planted should be listed on the plant list 4 . Architectural Elevations elevations must be submitted with the plans April 18, 1991 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of P1 ng FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee RE: Clark Corners #91-10P 5 We have reviewed the drawings dated 3-1 -91 for the proposed Clark Corners Site Plan and have the followin c ents: 1 . The plans do not reflect the proposed road configuration of Clark Street. This is under contract and needs to be shown. The new configuration will cause several changes in the proposed Site Plan. 2 . Topographic Map a. Size and type of storm and underdrain pipes need to be indicated. Also top of frame elevation inverts etc. for the structures should be shown. b. The proposed sanitary sewer to Ellington Road as shown is not acceptable. There are several alternatives that would be acceptable. 1 . If the sanitary sewer is installed prior to or as part of the Clark Street Reconstruction Project a . The sanitary manhole in Clark Street opposite building "D" should be placed in the middle of the new pavement and the manhole near building E" brought out into the center of the new pavement. The 3001± of 8" pipe between these two would then become a main line and would be under Clark Street. b. The sanitary manhole in Clark Street opposite building "D" should be placed in the middle of the new pavement and a new manhole placed on Clark Corner property between building "D" and the manhole in Clark Street. The manhole near building "E" should be used for lateral connections and a single pipe run to the manhole in Clark Street. 2 . If the sanitary sewer is installed after the reconstruction of Clark Street is completed, the sanitary sewer will be run on Clark Corner property parallel to Clark Street and will connect to the existing sanitary main in Ellington Road. A new manhole will be placed over the existing sewer main to make this connection. Marcia A. Banach April 18, 1991 Page 2 . C . The proposed sanitary sewer at Deming Street and Clark Street does not coordinate with the approved Berman- Russo Site Plan and Clark Street Reconstruction plans. Also there are too many connections to the existing manhole. Please have applicants engineer coordinate this and present a new plan. d. The proposed sanitary manholes should be numbered for ease of identification, and inverts, top of frame elevations should be shown. Also inverts for laterals need to be shown. e. A guard rail should be utilized in the parking lot for Building "D" along the edge fronting on the proposed pond. f . Type of pipe used for sanitary sewer should be noted. 3 . Sheet 8 of 10 a . Pavement section indicates 4" stone base and 5" gravel subbase. Please provide pavement design indicating that this is sufficient. b. Timber guide rail is detailed, however no guide rail is shown on the plans . C . Underdrain and pipe trench details need to show warning tape above pipes . d. Sanitary sewer trench detail needs to be identified. 4 . Sheet 9 of 10 a. A detail "Orifice Plate" is shown. Where is this to be utilized? b. A toe wall is required for the concrete culvert end. The plans submitted ignore the proposed Clark Street reconstruction and the approved Berman-Russo improvements . Until the plans address these, we cannot make a recommendation. Also the reconstruction of Clark Street is projected to start in June 1991 and the improvements proposed by the Clark Corners Project must be coordinated so that they will be in place prior to the new pavement being put in place. JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Town OfMEMORANDUMSouth M: Marcia A. Banach - Director of Planning Windsor FROM: sergeant T. Hart #103 DATE: 23 April, 1991Police ServicesSUBJECT. Project # 91-10P Clark Corners No comment at this time. Please refer to previous comments on above project as was submitted earlier. t SIGNATURE Sergeant Thomas C. Hart #103 Traffic Services APPROVED. it JL DATE. SWPS-4 Rev. 9/87) 4 'joiN af,` a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 l osOR•CON AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 30, 1991 Mr. John G. Samsel 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: re: Appl. #91-10P, Clark Corners Site Plan Please be advised that the public hearing in the above matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 14, 1991, at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Signs advertising the hearing must be posted for 10 consecutive days prior to the hearing, and must be clearly visible from the road. Please have them posted by Friday, May 3, 1991 . Signs should be placed on the easterly side of Clark Street, the southerly side of Ellington Road, and the northerly side of Deming Street. Signs can be purchased in the Town Hall for $5 . 00 each. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION l J Louise C. Evans Chairman cc: Applicant Engineer M. Banach, Dir. of Planning PLANNING DEPAR 1' IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORK TO: Jean Zurbrigen,. Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, M 1 Stead,I Thomas Hart, Fire Marshall Lanning, "maSnow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# 9 1-1 o •P C'o Zone R Acreage 1' . 50 Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial_ Industrial Location: SUVA1_'e Gt,,tom• CAz"_'n J Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No_,,, a)new streets existing frontage also) b)new open space/recreation area active passive c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by y 3 if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your d partment when I do a Planning Department report. t a . sue-- gfi.. , ,.; U-'_ C-d---V\„-- Qk i CM•--.:N '' .r-e.-y_ cL, /C,-.+:K/p Ufi • /1.. ..IUa,,.--f,L.,...e. ,, c5--.C.4J,....:v-q PiW-Cr c 9-1-ya.t /.Je3l 't.. ....nct..e-e./S wt.nMn.S' Ol.a liLc/•/ 411 Mci ten,.--'..`-'f`-•-- -E- s 4Z,-t,-.,..- ,.,,..--, f`, f-[-y }„ ___. Lam_ „ cj RECEIVED PLANNIM D APR 22 1991 IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORK SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPTo TO: Jean Zurbrigen, Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fre$, Shaw Thomas Hart, Fire Marshall Canning, FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# 9 1-i o IN cja,iay, Zone 4,,.—Acreage o . -So Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial_ Industrial_ Location: Sc,e a-,uA.1V\. C,EA/,un VProjectDescription: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No a)new streets existing frontage also) b)new open space/recreation area active passive c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by yl,a q i if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your epartment en I do a Planning Department report. Rpm BERMAN & RUSSO MAY 14 1991 ATTORNEYS AT LAW I 481 BUCKLAND xOAD South Windsor SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 06074 Planning & Zoning Commission TELEPHONE(203)644-1548 FAX(203)644-6286 VERNON OFFICE JON D. BEAMAN 81 WEST MAIN STREET FRANK W.RUSSO ROCKVILLE,CONNECTICUT 06066 BRIAN S. KABPE TELEPHONE(203)872-7505 REPLY TO:SOUTH WINDSOR May 14, 1991 Planning & Zoning Commission Town Hall South Windsor, CT. 06074 RE: Clark Corners/Public Hearing Dear Commission Members: We are the owners of property known as 819 Clark Street located directly opposite the "Clark Corners" parcel. We have reviewed the site plan before you and have worked with Town staff and the applicant to coordinate various items of mutual interest. We would like to express our complete support for the Clark Corners proposal. Sincerely, Obn D. Berman Frank W. usso May 14, 1991 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Plauning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee RE: Clark Corners - #91-10P We have reviewed the revised plans dated J- 0-91 received on 5-13-91 for the proposed Clark Corners site and have the following comment: 1 . The key map should reflect the revised sanitary sewer design. 2 . The new storm sewer system for Clark Street should be shown on plans and also sewer profile where appropriate. 3 . The intersection of Ellington and Clark Street should be carefully coordinated with the Clark Street Reconstruction Project. 4 . Site distance from the Clark Corners exit should be checked before final planting of trees . 5 . Sanitary manhole #4 should indicate its location by using the stationing of the new centerline of Clark Street. 6 . The location of the sidewalk along Clark Street should be reviewed. 7 . Provide a detail for connection of sanitary lateral from Building H to sanitary main. Also provide proposed inverts. 8 . Trench detail - please identify pipe bedding material. JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works tBYKED DATE PROJECT Q NEILL PREPARED DATE FUSS BY consulting engineers 5. 1-5-9 1 SHEET r j f lC Corn ors (S- a- orao k of - M G 1G 1 I I r 71 7 IV LLc..G- I 177 jz I J fi"---_—i L 'f'_ mot------f-_ JL a i--'---; - T- 6-4 qq // I- .... _ - 1_•- tL41 1 FUSS&O NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT r consulting engineers BY By I p ( SHEET NOryornbe_ C'G r K ;o n e r 5 .,f o be-oO) ofimp G iA) 1a- Z roS6 t r-M j 05) 44- r-I I, i TT loli izi-I i --- 4 ; i4 t i i { FO-0 110 Storm Sewer System Design Iq FT-4-3 4J lei, 43 E V u p• p' ,+.LTJ H a1 1-3 ai cv a at t.a of Y q rl ' a; ii l 4 cD to a E 4 E f • c 14 1.1 12 13 1 2 3 l 5 _ 7 9 55 01 0$ 6, O 1 z91 r O L LL I 5 { 3 15 3 Z ' 03 2 9; . C ,015 13.5 (9 2 I _L 1 Q c8 4-og 'S I Z 2 I 3 Lo 5'' I_(o'03 3 . , qS' ,015 p RL °a 5 52 J _ 3 005 3,1'coI i 5' •015 FES o9 l4 o n D 1 Z 1 OI o 01 5 inlet 0 IN U Sta_ ion and Off set J IU1 IN ln I, i I Imo: Time to Inlet I 1111i II Ilil . l N W Area in Acres A Runo- H Coe* lEicient INiiil . Illlllill i1i11 I I N n ISum of AI I 40- II V. IA I 1-- j Total Al I I I [ Al fa' I Rainfall Intensity I 111ii1 Q to Inlet tT 0 `, O 0 u O •= Grade of Gutter f E O ll r 1 Cross Slope of O O Shoulder r Depth of Flow N at Gutter O Width of Plow Bypass: L inlet AI Bypassing Inlet AI- Entering Catch J U1 Bas in oNI zaauc nq pa toa40 C'" - 4 t , 33h, ZS 3yIiQ 4q aso saQu O oa;. o 3 LETTER OF TRANSMITTALO Date - - Project No. consulting engineers Attention: 146 Hartford Rd,Manchester,CT 06040-5921/(203)646-2469 Fax: (20 )643-6313 RE: TO cr We are sending you ttached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop Drawings 0,16rints Plans Samples 0 Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order 0 Other Copies Date No.Descriptio MAY 2 S ski S09th Windsor Ding Commissiop These are transmitted as checked below: V.EIFr approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval r your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment For Bids Due 19 Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS Copy to SIGNED:-- FO-100 QQMAY291991 ASSI U v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511SOR.C TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JUNE 1, 1991 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION At its May 28 , 1991 regular meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to take the following action: 1 . Approve Appl . #91-10p, John G. Samsel, for a Site Plan of Development of 11+ ac, to be known as Clark Corners, located on the southerly side of Ellington Rd. , easterly side of Clark St. , and northerly side of Deming St. , RC zone PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Louise C. Evans, Chairman Bernard Hart, Secretary Item #1 - the vote was unanimous with Evans, Gallicchio, Castro, Hart, Murrin, and March voting in favor of the application C U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 R•ca AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 5, 1991 RECEIVED Mr. John Samsel 152 Deming Street JUN 7 1991 South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: 3g' WINDSOR PLMMAG Uffo Subject: Easement - Clark Street Per our conversation today, please find enclosed an additional copy of the easement document and map for said easement. As we have discussed previously, the timing oforyouulaand your partners granting of the easement and the schedule rk Corners' utility installation (namely, the sanitary sewer) are of critical concern to the Town. Previous conversations have indicated that the granting of the easement would be forthcoming after the granting of the ZBA building line variance, then subsequently, after P & Z approval of Clark Corners . Based on this information and in an effort to coordinate both the Town project and Clark Corners, the Town temporarily suspended its work on Clark Street. It is now my understanding that the easement will be granted only after the 15 day appeal period for Clark Corners has expired, after the review/approval of Mr. Holcombe's application for an adjoining parcel, and after Mr. Holcombe's payment to you for said parcel. As I have indicated before, we had been expecting to resume work on Clark Street at the end of June. Non-acquisition of this necessary easement may seriously delay our progress. We would appreciate knowing what your anticipated time frame is for granting of the easement so that we may make appropriate arrangements and decisions. We appreciate your effort and cooperation in this matter but ask for your consideration in affording any opportunity to expedite the easement granting process . We stand ready to meet with you, your bankers and/or attorney to resolve this matter. s i i Mr. John Samsel i June 5, 1991 Page 2 I thank you for your attention to this matter, and I would appreciate hearing from you by June 13, 1991 so that we may evaluate our schedule. Very truly yours, 22rri Lit-r 4 Michael J. GaAtick, P.E. Director of Public Works I MJG:bmr Enc. I i cc: Jean E. Zurbrigen, Town Manager Marcia Banach Director of Planning Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer i i I r yaw N e4( ti U 7-a aps q0&U&0tO C 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 f SOR•CON AREA CODE 203/644-2511 February 4, 1992 John Samsel, Jr. 152 Deming Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Samsel: Re: Application #90-80P, Clark Corners At the February 3, 1992 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved a three year extension of Application #90-80P with all original and standard conditions. Application #90-80P expires on March 11, 1995. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission EAW/pmm cc: Director of Planning Planning & Zoning Commission Town Engineer