Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
125 Buckland Hills Drive (5)
Electric# A13 (At von . 16 apl Ir A TION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# 00 12 5 BUGKLy LND MILLS DRIVE HVAC #D 'Road) Date: fn Sprinkler# 14 6 -t II t((E-rc No.26752 FINAL APPROVAL ((q{= ircsqfP Estimated Cost $ UU.O 0BuildingOoJ/L. COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee 3_c`Engineering oo TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee $ 3PYAffidavito6QOSIGNONREVERSESIDEAppr.for CO. ti v J/lC, Total Fee V'6 d vTOBUILDINGDEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Additional Cost) $ The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications: Job Location_:, CCU L K1 - , Lot No._Side of Street s Zone 6,0ApplicantoywE_le Co fj!5 —2 uCT!'o Co i,2 P, Tel. Address_`333 N0 49 r- Zi a Lic. # Owner"t'I RC,6? S7'O DES Address 0 cJ C'ffbLC,FT ,GG. ILIZIyIUE,a.'S M IU ciCi4orArchitect$7TE'2, L/}cff LTicJMT12dM Addressl2o j::f_t2S7-AUIJ tJ012Tt74 "iiCJVfz4& QS 0 Ut -cfo/Sq. Ft.New Area: 1st FI. rz TS647 2nd FI. 3rd FI. Total New Area Iz4 {Rooms `f94 Lavatories 11 Bathrooms Garages_ QPurposeofthispermit: 1-0 COlist4W T P if P2 F—TftI:i—' 0 Pil-RrJL4a OT- City Water Well 0 Septic System 0 Sewer Use Group Nk Construction Type Area Basement Garage Approved by Date Revised 6/95 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines and required distances from all other zones and is located in a zone in which thi building and its use is allowed. Signed I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this a ication for the permit 7ESigned DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LI - INSPECTION COMMENTS AFFIDAVIT Location of Job: Target Store T-1249 Additional Fee: None required South Windsor, CT State of Minnesota ) ss. .Minneapolis County of Hennepin ) I. Daniel J. Willenbring, Project Manager, agent for Target Stores, a division of Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, the Owner of the building erected under Permit No.26752 issued by the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut,being duly sworn,make oath and say that the actual cost of the improvements authorized under permit was under the estimated cost of 7,3819185. t Si ed: Daniel J. W' lenbring Project M ager- Target/Stes Estimated Cost: $ 7,381,185 Difference: $Zero Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th_day of September, 2000. 1. 1rNOTARYNDA E. JOHNSON PUBLIC-AMESOTA ommission 60U JM.31.2006 Notary Public SEAL My commission expires: 3 p Approval By Appl Inspection / Due Whom Code Comment Code Description 6,680,000 WITH SUPER BOB- SMEDLEY FOOTING 1LINE J TO C26752-B 05/0910/00 JFF A 05/ /00 JFF A WITH SUPER BOB SMEDLEY OK TO POUR 1LINE A TB01FOOTING B01 FOOTING D A LINE 1 TO 5 05/11/00 JFF A WITH SUPER J LINE 1 LINE TO 4PLUS OK TO POUR BO1 FOOTING 05/11/00 JFF A WITH SUPER PERIMETER SLAB INSULATION 1 LINE B04 INSULATION J TO H 2IN STYROFOAM 4FT DEEP34WITH SUPER 05/12/00 DCJ A 10 PADS, COL. LINE 2, , BO1 FOOTING 05/15/00 JFF A WITH SUPER FRONT WALL B04 EAST OF 4 LINE TO 8 B01 FOOTING 00 JFF A PERIMERTER SLAB 2IN RIGID R1005/15 B04 INSULATION A WITH SUPER INSTALLING SLAB INSULATION 05/1 B01 FOOTING 05/16/00/ 00 JFF JFF A FRONT WALL A LINE COL 6 TO 10 B01 FOOTING 00 JFF D POUR CANCELLED RAIN WITH SUPER 05/18 B01 FOOTING D WITH SUPER CANCELLED RAIN PIERS BO1 FOOTING 05/ 9/ 00/ 00 JFF JFF A J LINE 6PT5 TO 13 ON J LINE E TO H LINE05/1 B01 FOOTING 6 TO 9 FOOTING ON J LINE 05/23/00 JFF A WITH SUPER COL PIERS D TO G LINE 7 8 9 B01 FOOTING B04 BACK WALL COL 1 TO 6 05/24/00 JFF A WITH SUPER FOOTING 13 LINE J TO F BO1 FOOTING 00 JFF A PIERS 7 AN 8 LINE 13 LINE FOOTING E TO C05/25 05/2 /00 JFF A COL PIERS 9 10 11 LINE F TO I WITH SUPER BOBB01FOOTING B01 FOOTING 05/30/00 JFF A WITH SUPER 7 COL MATS B01 FOOTING 06/14/00 JFF A RESTROOM 143 AN RELATED FLOOR DRAINS AREA P02 UNDERGROUND LINE 12 F TO G JFF A CONNECTING LINE FROM MAINTENCE RM143 12 OF LI06/15/00 P02 UNDERGROUND LINE 5PD AIR WITH SUPER BOB AN SULLIVAN E02 UNDERGROUND 06/15/00 JDI A REMAINDER 06/16/00 JFF A ER OF CONNECTING LINE FROM RM 143 T P02 UNDERGROUND DISCHARGE SLAB POUR 5 TO 9 C TO J CHECK INT. WALL ASSEMBLY-REQUEST RVALUE ON 06/19/00 CJD A B03 FRAMING (ROUGH)STYROFOAM. STYRO./1/2 PLY/5/8 SHEETROCK 8/00 JFF A VARIOUS WALLS WITH SUPER BOB06/2 B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) JFF A UG HVAC INSIDE MAIN ENTRANCE 06/2 /00 H02 UNDERGROUND 06/ /00 JFF A WATER MAIN ENTRANCE APPROX 5FT WITH SUPER BOB29 P02 UNDERGROUND 06/ 29/ 00 DCJ A B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 07/03/00 CJD A PHARMACY AREA B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 06/30/00 JDI A RELEASED TO N.U. E01 SERVICE 06/30/00 JDI A 9 OTHER p7/05/00 JFF A MAIN ENTRANCE PARAPET WEST LINE 10 TO 4 AE0 P0 ROUGH INTERIOR OFFICE WALLS WITH SUPER BOB 07/07/00 DCJ A TRENCH DRAIN AT MAIN ENTRANCE, DWV AND WATER P03 ROUGH AT BATHROOMS 07/13/00 JFF A OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER EXIT CORRIDOR B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) WITH SUPER BOB 07/13/00 JFF A OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER EXIT CORRIDOR E03 ROUGH WITH SUPER BOB 07/13/00 JFF A OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER CORRIDOR WITH P03 ROUGH SUPER BOB 07/14/00 DCJ A OFFICE AREAS B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 07/14/00 DCJ A PUBLIC REST ROOMS P03 ROUGH 07/14/00 DCJ A PARTIAL ABOVE CEILING E03 ROUGH 07/18/00 JFF A WITH CONTRACTOR 4 4IN CONDIUT MANHOLE TO E02 UNDERGROUND TRANSFORMER PAD 42IN BURIAL PLUS 3IN CONCRETE 07/19/00 JFF A ABOVE CEILING FIXTURES AN DIFFUSERS SEPERATED B03 FRAMING (ROUGH)HUNG WITH SUPER 08/03/00 JDI A PROGRESS E09 OTHER 08/03/00 JDI A KITCHEN AND FRONT FOYER E03 ROUGH 08/30/00 JFF A LEFT APPROVAL STICKERT WITH SUPER BOB PO4 GAS TEST 800 1146-S 60,00010600-P 180,00010899-H 125,0001140-S Inspection / Approval Date By Appl Code Description Due Whom Code Comment 16832-E 300,000 1141-S 385 16863-E 10,000 16885-E 3,000 16895-E 12,000 16986-E 10,000 Total Est Value 7,381,185 f Inspection / Approval Date By ApplCodeDescriptionDueWhomCode Comment 6,680,000--------26752-B B01 FOOTING 05/ 10/ 00 JFF A WITH SUPER BOB SMEDLEY FOOTING 1LINE J TO CBO1FOOTING05/10/00 JFF A WITH SUPER BOB SMEDLEY OK TO POUR 1LINE A TOB01FOOTING05/11/00 JFF A WITH LSUPER JINE1OLINE1LINETO4PLUSOKTOPOURB04INSULATION05/11/00 JFF A WITH SUPER PERIMETER SLAB INSULATION 1 LINEB01FOOTINGJTOH2INSTYROFOAM4FTDEEPB01FOOTING05/12/00 DCJ A 10 PADS, COL. LINE 2,3,4 WITH SUPERB04INSULATION05/15/00 JFF A WITH SUPER FRONT WALL B04 EAST OF 4 LINE TO 8B01FOOTING05/15/00 JFF A PERIMERTER SLAB 2IN RIGID R10B01FOOTING05/16/00 JFF A WITH SUPER INSTALLING SLAB INSULATIONB01FOOTING05/17/00 JFF A FRONT WALL A LINE COL 6 TO 10B01FOOTING 05/18/00 JFF D POUR CANCELLED RAIN WITH SUPERB01FOOTING 05/19/00 JFF D WITH SUPER CANCELLED RAIN05/22/00 JFF A J LINE 6PT5 TO 13 ON J LINE E TO H LINE PIERSB01FOOTING6TO9FOOTINGONJLINE05/23/00 JFF A WITH SUPER COL PIERS D TO G LINE 7 8 9B01FOOTING05/24/00 JFF A B04 BACK WALL COL 1 TO 6B01FOOTINGWITHSUPERFOOTING13LINE J TO F 05/26/ 00/ 00 J B01 FOOTING 05/2 JFF A PIERS 7 AN 8 LINE 13 LINE FOOTING E TO CB01FOOTINGFFACOLPIERS91011LINEFTOIWITHSUPER BOBP02UNDERGROUND05/30/00 JFF A WITH SUPER 7 COL MATS06/14/00 JFF A RESTROOM 143 AN RELATED FLOOR DRAINS AREAP02UNDERGROUND06/15/00 JFF A LINE 12 F TO G CONNECTING LINE FROM MAINTENCE RM143 12 OF LIE02UNDERGROUND06/15/00 JDI ALINE SPD AIR WITH SUPER BOB AN SULLIVANP02UNDERGROUND06/16/00 JFF A REMAINDER OF CONNECTING LINE FROM RM 143 TOB03FRAMING (ROUGH)DISCHARGE SLAB POUR 5 TO 9 C TO J06/19/00 CJD A CHECK INT. WALL ASSEMBLY-REQUEST RVALUE ONAB03FRAMING (ROUGH) 06/28/00 JFF A VARIOUS YWALLSWIITHISUPERYBOBB SHEETROCKH02UNDERGROUND06/29/00 JFF AP02UNDERGROUND06/29/00 JFF p,UG HVAC INSIDE MAIN ENTRANCEB03FRAMING (ROUGH) 06/30/00 DCJ A WATER MAIN ENTRANCE APPROX 5FT WITH SUPER BOBB03FRAMING (ROUGH) 07/03/00 CJD AE01SERVICE06/30/00 JDI A PHARMACY AREA E09 OTHER 06/30/00 JDI A RELEASED TO N.U. P03 ROUGH 07/05/00 JFF A MAIN ENTRANCE PARAPET WEST LINE 10 TO 4 ANP03ROUGHINTERIOROFFICEWALLSWITHSUPERBOB07/07/00 DCJ A TRENCH DRAIN AT MAIN ENTRANCE, DWV AND WATERB03FRAMING (ROUGH) 07/13/00 JFF AAT BATHROOMS OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER EXIT CORRIDORE03ROUGH07/13/00 JFF A WITH SUPER BOB OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER EXIT CORRIDORP03ROUGH07/13/00 JFF AWITH SUPER BOB OFFICE AREA EAST OF CENTER CORRIDOR WITHB03FRAMING (ROUGH) 07/14/00 DCJ A SUPER BOB P03 ROUGH 07/14/00 DCJ A OFFICE AREAS E03 ROUGH OMS07/14/00 DCJ A PARTIAL PUBLIC RABOVEEST OCEILINGE02UNDERGROUND07/18/00 JFF A WITH CONTRACTOR 4 4IN CONDIUT MANHOLE TOB03FRAMING (ROUGH)TRANSFORMER PAD 42IN BURIAL PLUS 3IN CONCRETE07/19/00 JFF A ABOVE CEILING FIXTURES AN DIFFUSERS SEPERATEDE09OTHER08/03/00 JDI A HUNG WITH SUPER E03 ROUGH 08/03/00 JDI A PROGRESS PO4 GAS TEST KITCHEN AND FRONT FOYER 1146-S 800 08/30/00 JFF A LEFT APPROVAL STICKERT WITH SUPER BOB10600-P 60,00010899-H 180,0001140-S 125,000 Inspection / Approval Date ApplCodeDescriptionDueWhomCodeCode Comment 16832-E 300,0001141-S 38516863-E 10,00016885-E 3,00016895-E 12,00016986-E 10,000 Total Est Value 7,381,185 f SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 125 BUCKLAND HILLS DRIVE LOT_# Reviewed By Engineer' KONOVER CONSTRUCTION CORP Date Reviewed D Approved eni 333 NORTH MAIN STREET,WEST HARTFORD,CT Reviewed By Pla BP # 26752 Ph_# (860)236-6981 Date Reviewed v Approve enied Date Submitted 00/00/00 FOR C of 0 ***** As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: Approved Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan 3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking 4. Utility location; a. sanitary sewer/septic system b. foundation drain c. electrical & telephone d. water e. other 5. Sewer connection charge paid Lolulvo 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding i 8. Planning & Zoning/ Inland Wetlands Considerations A. Lighting B. Signage Freestanding Wall C. Fee in lieu of Open Space Sewer Permit No. '7 br5 Pavement Excavation No. Ri VE COMMENTS: eAUG 2 8 2OW i SOUTH WINDSORA0411C-6* ENG.DEPT. i 23- 3s SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECT C1jrW 125 BUCKLAND HILLS DRIVE LOT_# Reviewed By ering) KONOVER CONSTRUCTION CORP Date Reviewed prov enied 333 NORTH MAIN STREET,WEST HARTFORD,CT Reviewed By Planning) BP_#_26752_ Ph_# (860)236-6981 Date Reviewe Approv enied Date Submitted 00/00/00 FOR C o O ***** As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: Appro ed Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan 3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking 4. Utility location; a. sanitary sewer/septic system fb. foundation drain C. electrical & telephone d. water e. other 5. Sewer connection charge paid 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding B. Planning & Zoning/ Inland Wetlands Considerations X A. Lighting B. Signage Freestanding Wall C. Fee in lieu of Open Space Sewer Permit No. qq O Pavement Excavation No. 1® k0lVEp COMMENTS: EP 000 ENG.DEFT, t d k44 rg DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT PERMIT# Application is hereby:TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 3BUILDINGDEPARTMENT APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# 4Dale o 644-2511 ext. 230 Yllaing Inspector Application must be printed or.typed Location of Job- C Ire Ct a1/. A1 7/1FEESCHEDULE4 r 0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Street Lot No. Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No. APPLICANT APPLICANT ADDRESS 7 6 l el-o 4 ST e7(00/0 APPLICANT PHONE# 97 d 7 3 J_J N OWNER SC, Vt-C / VI S OWNER ADDRESS Co WCIJ91 Le ac OWNER PHONE F( 0 MJ C , INA C ESTIMATED COST$ c C)U C IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? Ayes O No ICJ FEE ENCLOSED$ 3, 00 TYPE OF JOB: SOR.co Original Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8i99 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION?Ad YES NO BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCYASSEMBLY 1 MERCANTILE El EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'-S NAMEFACTORY PHONE STORAGE ADDRESSGARAGE MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD110 SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? YES NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBNUTTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK o C THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TOCOMPLYWITHALLLOCALORDINANCESANDSTATEOFCONNECTICUTBUILDINGCODESINTHEPERFORMANCEOFSUCHWORK. ekl-3 3 z Z-- ( CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 7—OVDATEel DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT PERMIT# Application is hereby:TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# 7//(cw 30&644-2511 ext. 230 a S Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed I Location of Job: FEE SCHEDULE ee tt a 0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Lot No. Over$1,000 13.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No. APPLICANT te APPLICANT ADDRESS C7 .r GyoO,d l cacza Ol a G 7 APPLICANT PHONE# 111000 0* N OWNERSie'e 07 9 OWNER ADDRESS OWNER PHONE s ESTIMATED COST$ D 0 IS THIS A CONTRACT COST?Yes 0 No FEE ENCLOSED$ ri TYPE OF JOB: SOR.Cp11 JROriginal Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8i99 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? YES NO 40 BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCYASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONEFACTORY STORAGE ADDRESS GARAGE MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD /Oct Q SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? YES NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO, TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE DEPARTMENT DECISION ELECTRICAL PERMIT PER BAPPLICATIONFORELECTL Application is hereby: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit# PR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE S 644-2511 ext.230 cx fee,, Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed Location ofjob Street No. Street Lot No. FEE SCHEDULE Floor Apt.No. Over $1,000 wp$1w per$1,000 OWNER or any MiCtion thereof ADDRESS 19vGIl a oAn OWNERS PRONE# L µ 4 APPLICANT 1 - C T'^ ADDRESS E Q' Ot O q oc.. s'tom..f• f a.• 3= 'COD ,. ESTIMATED COSTS ,,.r' C IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? _•y YES NO FEE ENCLOSED S s.OR CO TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 11/95 1 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT(Continued from rcvcrse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH AESIDENTIALBUILDINGPERMITAPPLICATIONYES / NOBUSINESS ASSEMBLY [CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCYMERCANTILE EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY INSTITUTIONAL FACTORY STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONEGARAGE MIXED USE ADDRESS Other please specify) CITY STATE ZIP TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD N, - w I Vr60 CTY SY54-CM . SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED?YES/NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPERATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORD CCT/ t) THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND ISTOCOMPLYWITHALLLOCALORDINANCESANDSTATEOFCONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. cae lxfkz cz, El 12s Il l Of NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIG 2TUREEOfAPPLICANTPHONENO. U-a){-9 7g DATE DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATI ON FOR ELECTRICAL PERMITApplicationishereby:TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# BUILDING DEPARTMENT 0 3APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext. 230 Bldg.Permit# ate Building Inspector c,C(o Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: 13(4 c k1Cj,0 1;11fit-$100—$13.00 Street No, r Over$1,000=Street Lot No, 13.00 per$c1 000 or any'fmction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No. fi 3 TZ APPLICANT APPLICANT ADDRESS A/ APPLICANT PHONE# OWNER 2 346 OWNER ADDRESS ice E.n OWNER PHONE ESTIMATED COST$ IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? es 13 No FEE ENCLOSED$ Q --- TYPE OF JOB: 406riginal Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 r = F' tLt APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? YES NO 0 RESIDENTIAL QV SINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY 0 ASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY lZ EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ENGINE,ER'-S NAME PHONE G FACTORY STORAGE ADDRESS 2 -5 2 GARAGE MIXED USE CITY eje STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATIONIWIR.ING METHOD SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? YES NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. 44 e Xe -932 CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE Sep 20 00 12: 05p R. R. MOrrison 860-497 aaICI----.-TARGET CORM o 1-7 Town of South Windsor Chief Building Inspector John Collins 1540 Sullivan St. Dear John Collins, Target Corporation through their subcontractor Getronics, Inc. hired Howard Baldwin Company to do the initial low voltage wiring rough-in, and subsequently hired All Electric Company to do the final terminations. Sincerely, Richard Morrison, O.S.R. 900 Hartford Turnpike Waterford,CT. 06378 Property Development 1000 Nicollet Mall,Minneapolis, ?Ainnes=55403 DEPARTMENT DECISION kAPPLICATIONFORELECTRICALPERMIT Application is hereby:TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# 0(Ap BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 ext. 230 Bldg.Permit# 3DateBuildingInspector Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: s v C k/on LCr i+Z0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Street Lot No.Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 f or any fraction thereof Tenant De ignation Apt.No. APPLICANT ALL A1"Y1-"S I.LJ r APPLICANT ADDRESS 60 APPLICANT PHONE# a O - 041 N St OWNER rV -j-q< OWNER ADDRESS OWNER PHONE ESTIMATED COST$ Q 00 QV IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? 13 Yes 0 No FEE ENCLOSED$ / 0. y, SOR-C0 TYPE OF JOB: 0 Original Installation O Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 Vol APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? YES NO RESIDENTIAL Q:BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY ASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE FACTORY STORAGE ADDRESS GARAGE MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD SIZE OF MAIN FEEDERS AND RATING OF WIRE USED NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? YES NO NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED. DESCRIPTION OF WORK dA o p? )e -ham4 l sA w0r•K S-(A,4e 3 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. r 1- ' CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. IE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE v 56 Honcyoomb UL Nfilford40,06460 Fax-203-882-M13 Emm*(-AF?CACINC ao#.wm To Who it may emcem iris k8w is to inft=YM*a(PAIy t om)k*U& rtW tO tAC oat EkWice!PW'Uit'a tSW2- Proi.ed City Projed Addrew 2a d Ul.Wa*Order#: Lj Holdiar-.rams'w Lx%m rr 1'." r=s emu.• T a t. 4 • r.. icy_-;....a i.r..'s. .r;.ar._.......:..++i R. DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT PERMIT# Application is hereby: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR o 0z BUILDING DEPARTMENT AP3jw 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# 644-2511 ext. 230 f b0 ate Application must be printed or typed Location of Job: FEE SCHEDULE Mc ar/ Str . h r4 Street Lot No. Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 Apt.No. or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation I / dAPPLICANT474wv, a APPLICANT ADDRESS S, P17 s vL APPLICANT PHONE# 70 N St OWNER 0Wq f .. OWNER ADDRESS C L, OWNER PHONE ESTIMATED COST$ IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? XYes 0 No G FEE ENCLOSED$ F 1 TYPE OF JOB: SCR C New Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUELDLNG IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? YES ElNO BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY ASSEMBLY MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE FACTORY STORAGE ADDRESS GARAGE MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP Other please specify) TYPE OF INSTALLATION A&Le fjv SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN - NO.OF TOILETS D STYLE NO.URINALS Z STYLE NO.OF BATHTUBS NO.OF SHOWERS NO.OF LAVATORIES NO.OF CONDUCTORS SIZE NO.OF STACKS 2-- SIZE Jj AREA OF ROOF NO.OF CATCH BASINS NO.OF FLOOR DRAINS NO.OF OTHER FIXTURES 2. KIND F/ee e'lipls . ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY A WINDOW YESANO SIZE OF WINDOW IF NONE C.F.M.OF VENTILATOR SIZE OF DUCTS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK SIZE OF WATER MAIN SIZE OF WATER PIPING&RISER WATER HEATER: TYPE / ' P- , MANUFACTURER 7 DESCRIPTION OF WORK THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. C33. P--z o cCT2 CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT PERMIT# Application is hereby: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# W-2511 ext. 230 oc B ing Inspector Application must be printed or typed Location of Job: FEE SCHEDULE 0-$1,000=$13.0 Street No. Street Lot No. Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 Apt.No. or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation p APPLICANT APPLICANT ADDRESS APPLICANT PHONE# ab "b c,Z OWNER 1t,tZ '. 1i-K tJG OWNER ADDRESS OWNER PHONE t$o anoESTIMATEDCOST$ IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? eyes 13 No FEE ENCLOSED$ ZJe TYPE OF JOB: FOR O C O iVew Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT (Continued from reverse side TYPE OF YSTEM: TYPE OF BUILDING: HEATING RESIDENTIAL UKAIC a'COMMERCIAL UrVENTILATION INDUSTRIAL HEATING STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HYDRONIC WARM AIR UNIT RADIANT HEATER EXISTING RADIATION ADDITIONAL RADIATION TOTAL RADIATION DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE OF INSIDE OF DIFFERENCE OF TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUH) F(HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) GROSS HEATING CAPACITY(INPUT—BTUH) NET RATING(OUTPUT—BTUH) TYPE OF FUEL OIL—GPM OIL TANK LOCATION:INSIDE OUTSIDE CAPACITY GAS—INPUT LPG TANK CAPACITY ELECTRIC—KW AIR CONDITIONING DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE OF INSIDE OF DIFFERENCE OF TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH) HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL COOLING E PMENT(INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.) TONNAGE COOLING CAPACITY(BTUH) VENTILATION DESCRIBE ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUST EQUIPMENT) TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM(CFM) FRESH AIR INTAKE(CFM) PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK --rc"lcc W-64"- J,-tl P---Z JA t7t THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK. 1 - 503Y5-3 CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE I P- w DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR SPRINKLER PERMIT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PERMIT# Application is hereby: lBUILDINGDEPARTMENT APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit# Du 644-2511 ext. 230 2 6 }75-Q, Date Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed Location of Job: FEE SCHEDULE tD/2 0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Street Lot No. Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No. APPLICANT D u t APPLICANT ADDRESS 3 j— APPLICANT PHONE# 3 y 7- Zl P 5 W N $OWNER 2 L! 01 q OWNER ADDRESS O + OWNER PHONE C ESTIMATED COST$ IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? O Yes 0 No FEE ENCLOSED$ 13, 06 TYPE; New B: OR CO Installation 0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 APPLICATION FOR SPRINKLER PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USE GROUP NO. OF STORIES 9,AESIDENTIAL IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED ITH A PERMIT APPLICATION?AYEEVBUSINESSBUILDINGPEYES ASSEMBLY MERCANTILE CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY FACTORY STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE GARAGE MIXED USE ADDRESS Other please specify) CITY STATE ZIP KIND OF INSTALLATION DRY WET COMBINATION CHEMICAL SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN WATER PRESSURE AT STREET(PSI) ARE SPRINKLER HEADS ALTERED? YES NO IF YES,CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: ADDED DELETED ALTERED IF MORE THAN 3 HEADS ARE ADDED HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY(CHECK ONE)PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER INSURANCE COMPANY WATER FLOW WATER PRESSURE AT SPRINKLER HEADS(PSI) ARE PUMPS REQUIRED? YES NO IF YES,CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: FIRE BOOSTER OTHER ARE STANDPIPES PROVIDED? YES NO IS A SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROVIDED? YES NO SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAIN WATER SUPPLY RATING GPM TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD(TDH)OF FIRE PUMP PSI DESCRIPTION OF WORKIAJ,,S'rA- -L(- 4 AfS u c?J THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TOCOMPLYWITHALLLOCALORDINANCESANDSTATEOFCONNECTICUTBUILDINGCODESINTHEPERFORMANCEOFSUCHWORK. 46003 000 y 3 0CONTRACTORSLICENSENO. TYPE STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE L5 C DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR SPRINKLER PERMIT MIT Application is hereby:TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PER BUILDING DEPARTMENT PPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg. Permit 644-2511 ext. 230 2G ate Building Inspector Application must be printed or typed FEE SCHEDULE Location of Job: 0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Street Lot No. Over$1,000= 13.00 per$1,000 or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No. APPLICANT ` rti,..t 'Eyv c ZAR U APPLICANT ADDRESS APPLICANT PHONE# Q> -- Zak 100,01,111,111111111111111111WN S OWNER ,G ''T - -- —l— .! O OWNER ADDRESS OWNER PHONE C ESTIMATED COST$ V IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? Moves 0 No hoCJFEEENCLOSED$ I Cs ZS TYPE OF JOB: OR-CO M ew Installation Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99 I APPLICATION FOR SPRINKLER PERMIT (Continued from reverse side) TYPE OF BUI .nING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USE GROUP NO. OF STORIES RESIDENTIAL IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED ITH A BUSINESS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? DYES NO ASSEMBLY lO MERCANTILE CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY FACTORY STORAGE ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE GARAGE MIXED USE ADDRESS Other please specify) CITY STATE ZIP KIND OF INSTALLATION DRY lid WET COMBINATION CHEMICAL SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN ,Zo(WATER PRESSURE AT STREET PSI 1 ARE SPRINKLER HEADS ALTERED? YES 5-N'O IF YES,CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: ADDED DELETED ALTERED IF MORE THAN 3 HEADS ARE ADDED HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY(CHECK ONE)PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER INSURANCE COMPANY WATER FLOW 1442, (P WATER PRESSURE AT SPRINKLER HEADS(PSI) 8 2 l swas ARE PUMPS REQUIRED? YES UKO IF YES,CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: FIRE BOOSTER OTHER ARE STANDPIPES PROVIDED? YES U O IS A SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROVIDED? WYES NO SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAIN WATER SUPPLY RATING GPM TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD(TDH)OF FIRE PUMP PSI ESCRIPTION OF WORK f?lv (" t-c.tr9>l ,mow - 5—Z S THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TOCOMPLYWITHALLLOCALORDINANCESANDSTATEOFCONNECTICUTBUILDINGCODESINTHEPERFORMANCEOFSUCHWORK. 14C-114? I? 7- CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. STATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE 1 w LERSPRINHIPofHAZARDVILLE9INC.K 15 Barber Pond Road Bloomfield,Cr 06002 860)286-2804 FAX(860)243-5490 South Windsor Town Hall Building Dept. South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn.: Building Official Re: Application for Permit HFP Job# 00-4022 Gentlemen, In accordance with Public Act 91-95,this letter authorizes the below named agent to sign the above referenced application of William J. Rhodes Fire Sprinkler Contractor:HFP Sprinkler of Hazardville,Inc. 15 Barber Pond Road Bloomfield,CT 06002 Project Name: Target Store Location: Bucklamd Hills Drive South Windsor, Connecticut Starting Date:May 2000 Authorized Agent: James Underwood T u or yo o ion, ita Lic. #F11499 I viot ts ura ws K••o« Conn.Contractor's License F11499 TMCoNWMWI• N N N.MKu Nr.iK s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•C AREA CODE 860 / 644-25110 July 13, 2000 CERTIFIED#P462498103 Amco Sign Co., Inc. 1133 South Broad Street Wallingford, CT 06492 Re: Appl. #2468-00—Arnco Sign Co., Inc., representing Target Store's, Drive, Manchester, CT., GD zone To Whom It May Concern: At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals held on July 6, 2000, the Board approved with conditions your request for a variance to section 17.8.5 a to allow a free standing sign to be 48 squarefeet (24 square feet allowed). The Board concluded the hardship to be that ifthe sign were not erected, a traffic safety issue would arise. The conditions placed on this approval are as follows: 1.The bottom portion of the sign to be made of masonry brick, which will match the building. 2.No other business to be placed on the sign other than in the area identified as Lowes and Target Stores. 3.Illumination of the sign to be consistent with what was stated in the application. At the meeting the Board also approved your request for a variance to section 17.8.5 b to allow a second building sign approximately 60 square feet, at 125 Buckland Hills Drive, Manchester, CT., GD zone. The Board concluded the same hardship - if this sign were not erected there would be a traffic safetyissue. Any new building, or alteration/additions to existing buildings, requires a building permit prior to start of construction. Lemorx.L...... A To: John Collins,Building official CC: Planning&Zoning From: Charles P.Danna Jr.,Assessor EM6: 05/12/00 Re: Northern Hills Subdivision,Street(re)numbering As part of the recent subdivision&reconfiguration of the Northem Hills properti itistheappropriatetimetomendallstreetreferencesforpropertiesinvolved. erefore it is suggested that the following be considered for use and reference sPes Street'references shall be as though each individual building is located on Buckland Hills vethanasoffBucklandRoad(as is currently referenced). The code for Buckland Hills Drive 15400. rather yy,MM,,kkYf R k KITF 1 AKA 10 Buckland NKA 39 Buckland Hills Drive k AKA NKA Lot#3 AKA 20 Buckland R NKA 125 Buckland Hills Drive Lot#4 AKA O"` j C?-acj NKA 95 Buckland Hills Drive 105 Buckland Hills Drive h.Y Fy. ArS S k+ f_ 1 J J J STATE OF7777CONNmiouT ` 1 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION 6/03/1999 165 CAPITOL AVE • HARTFORD CT 06.106-1630 MAJOR CONTRACTo Be it kii1 i1.that KONOVER CONS'I'R.UCTION CORPSUITE305 333 N.MAIN$'I' W HARTFQR:CT 06117 Is certified by the Departriient of Consniaaer Protection as a isteredeg Mal:.;.or contractor, Registration lltumber:MCO.D0900071EffectiveDate: 7/01/1999 Expiration Date:.: 6/30/2000es T. FlemingCommissiorier sr DETACH CERTIFICATE ABOVE ALONG PERFORATION STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION 165 Capitol Avenue, Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1630 Attached is your registration. The pocket card below shall be carried on your person at all times while performingg said work. Such registration shall be shown to any properly interested person on request. No such re istration shallbetransferredtoorusedbyanyotherpersonotherthanthepersontowhomtheregistrationwasissued. If you need assistance,please feel free to contact the Department of Consumer Protection,Professional Trades Division at (860) 713-6135, coon,Real Estate C August 11, 1999 Raquel Rudquist,AIA Senior Project Architect Dayton Hudson Corp. 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis,MN 55403 Dear Ms. Rudquist: I have spoken with Dan Tierney in the Connecticut State Building Inspector's Office regarding your request for modification of the minimum design for roof pitch. He has indicated that such a modification would not be granted solely on the basis to meet the needs of an existing design for a new building. As you had indicated in our prior phone conversation,it would appear that a design modification on your part to accommodate the in nunum 1/" per foot roof pitch is necessary to approve this project. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Very truly yours, John R. Collins Chief Building Official Ni , tia DHC PROPERTY DELOPMENT r F . y1 4r August 2, 1999 C N Mr. John Collins Town Hall g = d 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 SUBJECT: Proposed Target Store in South Windsor(Manchester)CT IS, Target d; Target request for a modification to a requirement of the 1996 BOCA Building Code. d Dear Mr. Collins: ad„F Enclosed you will find the package for Target's request for modification of the State Building Code. Included are: 1. A request form 2. A cover letter to the state q 3. A proto set of construction documents. (NOTE; The South Windsor project foot print may be slightly different - but the systems used will be the same, although store specifica y k designed. Sincerely, N 5 Raquel Rudquist,AIA Senior Project Architect Dayton Hudson Corporation 612)761-1597 cc: Lori Johnson,TPN-11 C File 2.2 OR 3 , P h H:\data\wordRaquelR\RR080299.doc xy d 1 8y 4 et Mall,Minneapolis,MN 55403 1. 4M f. DHC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT July 30, 1999 s 5 State Of Connecticut Department of Public Safety Division of Fire,Emergency and Building Services Office of The State Building Inspector P.O.Box 2794 x Middletown, CT 06457-9294 15 9 SUBJECT: Request for Modification of the State Building Code UN RE: Proposed Target Store in South Windsor(Manchester)CT Dear Sir or Madam: 4'39 This letter is a request for a modification to a requirement of the 1996 BOCA Building Code submitted under the provisions of Section 106.2 "Modifications". BOCA 1996 section 1507.5 "Low Slope Roof Coverings requires that a 1/4" per 12" roof slope be designed for all roof systems except for coal-tar built-up roofs. Target requests a modification to this requirement as follows: Provide a roof structure with 1/8" per 12" slope typical. Provide a "Class A" roofing systemtsv "'g'tL 3 R, , comprised of a thermoplastic single ply membrane according to the requirements o arget s roofing specifications. In support of this request for Modification I offer the following facts for your consideration: This type of roof has been successfully installed on hundreds of Target stores nationwide over the past ten years with the 1/8" per 12" roof slope design. Based on this history an experience kx Rs Target believes that this roofing system is both appropriate and economical for the intended use on this project. The roofing manufacturers that are listed in the roofing specifications each have products that have been reviewed carefully for performance b experienced design professionals. The y p Y P com anies listed have had to provide business and financial information to Target in order top meet Target's requirements for ongoing roof warranty support. 6.3 r. Y dition of installed roofingTargethasestablishedaroofmaintenanceprogramtomonitorthecon x on all of the stores. This program includes a "Store Building Specialist" who is a trained y g employee located at the store. This person's job includes a monthly inspection of the roofing system. Information from these inspections is passed to Target's roofing consultant or evaluation. 3 t Mall,Minneapolis,MN 55403 July 30, 1999 Page 2 Roofing repairs and/or replacement is carried out based on an "as needed" condition of the roof system. Target has gained a great deal of practical experience with all types of single ply and built up roof systems.This experience has contributed to the refinement of the approved roofing designs and specifications that are currently in place for Target's construction program. Target expects the single ply membrane systems that are specified on current projects to have a functional lifetime of 15 to 20 years and possibly longer. Based on the experience of previous projects completed, the technical quality of the roofing systems,the experienced installation procedures, and the ongoing maintenance programs Target requests modification of the above referenced provision in the 1996 BOCA Code. Please respond with a written interpretation at your earliest convenience. If I can provide additional information please contact me at the number listed. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Sincerely, AQC F4 vattl Raquel Rudquist,AIA Senior Project Architect Dayton Hudson Corporation 612)761-1597 Encl: Project Manual Section 07500"Membrane Roofing System" One set of proto construction documents cc: Rich LaVere,TPN-12B Lori Johnson,TPN-11 C File 2.2 H:\data\wordRaquelR\RR073099.doc STATE OF CONNECTICUT FILE# DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE OF THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR P.0.BOX 2794 MIDDLETOWN,CT 06457-9294 TELEPHONE: (860) 685-8310 FAX: 860) 685-8365 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE 1. Name and Location of Building_ Target Stores NEQ Buckland Hills Dr. & Buckland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 No. Street Town State Zip 2. Building Owner Target Stores a Division of Dayton Hudson Corporation 3. Applicant's Name Raquel Rudquist Telephone (612) 761-1597 Name of Person to Contact Raquel Rudguist Telephone (612) 761-1597 Applicant's Address Target Plaza North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 No. Street Town State Zip 4. Date of Application for Building Permit 10/22/99 (estimate) 5. Use Group Mercantile A. Was there a change of use: 0 Yes. IMNo B. If yes from to 6. Type of Construction-Type 2c 7. Square Foot Area of Building (Total) 126218 s f. Maximum Square Foot Area per Floor not applicable 8. Number of Stories One story 9. Check Applicable Designation: JR New Building 0 Existing 0 Addition 13 Other(Explain) REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE Page 2 10. Building Code Section that modification is requested from BOCA 1996 section 1507.5 Low S1ope"Roof Coverings" requires that a 1/4" per .12" roof slope be designed for all roof systems except for coal-tar built up roofs. . 11. Modification Sought Provide a roof structure with -1/8" per, 12" slope tgpical. Provide a "Class A" roofing system comprised of a thermoplastic single ply membrane according to the requirements of Target's roofing specifications. In support of this request for Modification I offer the following facts for•your consideration: This type of roof has been successfully installed on hundreds of Target stores cont. on back) 12. Important Requirement (Failure to provide the following information will delay modification process). The Building Official must comment below on the modification request as per Connecticut General Statute 29-254 W. Support Request Do Not Support Request The decision on this request is left to the Office of the State Building Inspector. Please contact the undersigned. Building Official (Printed) Town Building Official Signature Date Telephone Number Best Time to Contact Building Official's written comments, if desired. MODAPP Rev.6/11/99 nationwide over the past ten -years with the 1/8" per 12" roof slope design. Based on this history and experience Target.believes .that this roofing system is both appropriate and economical for the intended use on this project. The roofing manufacturers that are listed in the roofing specifications each have products that have been reviewed carefully for performance by experienced design professionals. The companies listed have had to provide business and financial information to Target in order to meet Target's requirements for ongoing roof warranty'support. The roofing manufacturers accepted our 1/8" per 12" roof slope design (see attachments) . S 4 STRUCTURAL Statement of Special InspectionsENGINEERS COALITION CONNECTICUT ENGINEERS IN PRIVATE PRACTICE Project: T-1249; Target South Windsor, CT LOcation: Buckland Hills Drive and $uckland Road, South Windsor, Owner. Target Corporation I Owner's Address: 1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 F E B 10 2000 g Architect of Record: Robert M. Lucius Structural Engineer of Record:KONOVER C®NF ,RgTIONCharlesM. AultCORP. This Statement of Special Inspections is submitted as a condition for permit issuance in accordance with the Special Inspection requirements of the BOCA National Building Code. It includes a Schedule of Special Inspection Services applicable to this project as well as the name of the Special Inspector and the identity of other approved agencies intended to be retained for conducting these inspections. The Special Inspector shall keep records of all inspections and shall furnish inspection reports to the Building Official, Structural Engineer and Architect of Record. Discovered discrepancies shall be brought to the immediate attention of the Contractor for correction. If such discrepancies are not corrected,the discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of the Building Official, Structural Engineer and Architect of Record. The Special Inspection program does not relieve the Contractor of his or her responsibilities. Interim reports shall be submitted to the Building Official,Owner,Structural Engineer and Architect of Record. A Final Report of Special Inspections documenting completion of all required Special Inspections and correction of any discrepancies noted in the inspections shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of tUseandOccupancy. Job site safety and means and methods of construction are solely the responsibility of the Contractor. Interim Report Frequency: Weekly Minimum or per attached schedule. Prepared by: Charles M. Ault ES M.9 /0GPGLJ1 r type or print name) ar * N . 884 tom, 2la(S040 Signature Date Desi n''Pssional Seal Owner's Authorization: Building Official's Acceptance: Signature Date Signature Date SEC/CT Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections • OSEC/CT 1999 Sheet 2 of 7 Project: Schedule of Special Inspection Services The following sheets comprise the required schedule of special inspections for this project. The constructiondivisionswhichrequirespecialinspectionsforthisprojectareasfollows: Soils and Foundations Cold-Formed Steel FramingCast-in-Place Concrete Spray Fire Resistant MaterialPrecastConcreteWoodConstruction Masonry Exterior Insulation and Finish SystemStructuralSteelSpecialCases Inspection Agents Firm Address 1. Special Inspector Eastern Materials 114 Woodlawn Road Robert Powell, P.E. Testing, A Division of Berlin, CT 06037 Jaworski Geotech 2. Testing Laboratory Eastern Materials 114 Woodlawn Road Robert Powell, P.E. Testing, A Division of Berlin, CT 06037 Jaworski Geotech 3. Testing Laboratory 4. Other 1100 Peavey Building Charles M. Ault, P.E. Setter Leach & Lindstrom 730 Second Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Note: The qualifications of all personnel performing Special Inspection activities are subject to the approval oftheBuildingOfficial. The inspection and testing agent shall be engaged by the Owner or the Owner's Agent, and not by theContractororSubcontractorwhoseworkistobeinspectedortested. Any conflict of interest must be disclosedtotheBuildingOfficial, prior to commencing work. The credentials of all Inspectors and testing technicians shall be provided if requested. It is recommended that the person administering the Special Inspections program be a Professional Engineerexperiencedinthedesignofbuildings. Key for Minimum Qualifications of Ins ection A ents where indicated on Schedules PE Professional Engineer EIT Engineering in Training ACI American Concrete Institute Certified Concrete Field Testing TechnicianAWSAmericanWeldingSocietyCertifiedWeldingInspector ASNT American Society of Non-Destructive Testing-Level II or III Qualifications of inspection agents may be indicated on the Schedule in instances where the StructuralEngineerdeemssuchrequirementsareappropriate. SEC/CT Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections . ©SEC/CT 1999 Schedule of Special Inspection Services Sheet 3 of 7 Solis and Foundations Project: Item Agent No. Scope Qualif.) 1. Shallow Foundations 3 1. Site preparation: Determine pad has been P.E. Sup prepared in accordance with Geotechnical ervision) report prepared by the Geotechnical Group, . Inc., dated 11 January 1999. 2. Soil compaction at footing elevations each spread footing and along wall footing at 75' max spacing. 3. During backfill and base fill placement. 2.Controlled Structural FBI N/A 3. Deep Foundations N/A r 4. Other N/A SECJCT Form 101 Statement of Special Inspections ®SEC/CT 1999 Schedule of Special inspection Services Sheet 4 of 7 Cast-in-Place Concrete Project Item Agent No. Scope Qualif) 1. Mix Design 4. Historical or mixture data in accordance PE) with ACI 318. 2. Material Certification 4 Aggregate test reports PE) 4 Fly Ash chemical and physical analysis PE) 3. Reinforcement Installation 2 Placement of reinforcing for footings and.wall ACI) 4. Post-Tensioning Operations N/A 5. Batching Plant N/A 6. Formwork Geometry N/A 7. Concrete Placement 2 Footings and walls CAC I) 8. Evaluation of Concrete 2 One set (3 cylinders per set) for each days' Strength ACI) pour for each type of concrete. One addition set for each additional 50 cubic yards exceeding 25 cubic yards. 9. Curing and Protection 2 Footings and walls and slabs. ACI) 10. Other 2 One slump test per each 25 cubic yards or Slump and air ACI) fraction thereof. entrainment One air entrainment test for each 50 cubic yards or fraction tthereof. SEC/CT Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections • OSEC/CT 1999 of Special Inspection Services Sheet 5 of 7 Schedule Spec P Project: Masonry Item Agent No. Scope Qualif.) 1. Material Certification 4 Certification of: masonry unit type density an PE) shrinkage, mortar products. Mortar and grout mix design. 2. WWng of Mortar and Grout 2 First 100 square feet of wall. CACI) 3. Installation of Masonry 2 First .1000 square feet of wall. ACI) All wall prisms. All wall construction prior to grouting and closure of cleanouts. 4. Reinforcement Installation 2 All prior to grouting. CACI) 5. Grouting Operations 2 All ACI) 6. Weather Protection 2 Intermittent, as required, dependent on ACI) weather conditions. 7. Evaluation of Masonry 2 Prism method: prior to construction one set, Strength ACI 5 prisms. During construction one set, 3- prisms, per each 5000 &quare feet of wall. Unit strength method: Prior to construction de ermi compressive strength of masonry based on stre th o Tested masonry uni a mortar. During 8. Anchors and Ties construction strength test of masonry units, mo rtar and grout for each 5000 square feet of wall. 2 ACI) All 9. Other Schedule of Special Inspection Services i Sheet 6 of 7 Structural Steel Project Item Agent No. Scope Quaiif.) 1. fabricator Certification/ 4 AISC certified, Category I or independent Quality Control Procedures PE) testing laboratory inspection as specified in Specification Section 5110. 2. Material Certification 2 Structural steel, bolts, nuts, and washers: AWS, .Material identification markings and conforman( e ASNT) to specified ASTM standards. Weld Filler Mat- erials: Manufacturer's designation (certifica e of compliance required) and conformance to AWS 3. Open Web Steel Joists 2 Joist, joint girder bearing details, CAWS, including welds and bolts. ASNT) ' 4. Bolting 2 All, Specification,Specification, for structural joints ASNT) using ASTM A325 or ASTM A.450 bolts." 5. Welding 2 All, per AWS Dl.l. AWS) 6. Shear Connectors N/A 7. Structural Details 2 All for fit up and layout. AWS) ASNT) 8. Metal Deck 2 All fastenings for size, quality and spacing. AWS All deck laps to adjoining safety and ASNT) structure. 9. Other SEC/CT Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections • ®SEC/CT 1999 Schedule of Special Inspection Services Sheet. 7 of 7 Cold-Formed Meet Framing Project: Rem Agent No. Scope Qualif.) 1. Member Sizes 2 Cold formed steel size and conformance to AWS, specified size. ASNT) 2 Material Thickness 2 Cold formed steel thickness identification and AWS, conformance to specified thickness. ASNT) 3. Material Properties 2 Cold formed steel material identification and AWS, conformance to specified ASTW standards. ASNT) 4: Mechanical Connections 2 All: size, type, quantity and quality. ASNT) 5. We 2 All: per AWS D1.3. AWS, ASNT) 6. Framing Details All fit up and layout AWS, ASNT) 1NOVER 7.Other SEC/CT Form 101 Statement of Special Inspections • OSEC/CT 1999 STRUCTURAL ENGINEE Final Report of Special InspectionsRS COALITION CONNECTICUT ENGINEERS IN PRIVATE PRACTICE Project T-1249; Target South Windsor, CT Location: Buckland Hills Drive andBuckland Road, South Windsor, CT Owner. Target Corporation Owner's Address: 1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Architect of Record: Robert M. Lucius Structural Engineer of Record: Charles M. Ault To the best of my information, knowledge and belief, the Special Inspections required for this project, anditemizedintheStatementofSpecialInspectionssubmittedforpermit, have been performed and all discovered discrepancies have been reported and resolved other than the following: Comments: Attach continuation sheets ifrequired to complete the description of corrections.) Interim reports submitted prior to this final report form a basis for and are to be considered an integral part ofthisfinalreport. Respectfully submitted, Special Inspector Type or print name) Signature Date Design Professional Seal SEC/CT Form 102 • Final Report of Special Inspections • ©SEC/CT 1999 S U M N E R 5 C H E I N A DIVISION OF CARTER& BURGESS, INC December 10, 1999 Mr. John Collins Chief Building Inspector 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06460 Regarding: TARGET SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 99604 Dear Mr. Collins: Attached please find our report relative to the Independent Structural Engineering Review of the above-referenced building. It is my professional structural opinion that the structure has been properly organized and is conceptually correct, and complies with the intent of the therein- referenced Building Code requirements. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, SUMNER SCHEIN A DIVISION OF CARTER & BURGESS, INC. i Do ,,,Klrrs u_"l*" J' lw.a a ..: e:, 'e. Via•`, •.r.sn 16sulw; t 'll', Ag 1 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 23 EAST STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 T 617 225 0200 F 617 225 0216 Independent Structural Review South Windsor, Connecticut December, 1999 REPORT TO CITY OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVE. SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 06074 ATTENTION: JOHN COLLINS CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR REGARDING TARGET STORE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT DECEMBER 1999 99604.02 Page I Independent Structural Review South Windsor, Connecticut December, 1999 Building Description The Target structure is a one-story steel frame containing approximately 124,847 square feet of plan area, exterior reinforced masonry bearing walls, and masonry foundation walls supported by continuous concrete strip footings. The interior steel tube columns are supported on spread footings below floor slab. The structure was designed by Setter Leach & Lindstrom Inc. of Minneapolis Minnesota, with Charles M. Ault (Connecticut P.E. #18884) the Structural Engineer of Record. Attachment A lists the information that has been submitted and reviewed. Criteria for Review The following tasks have been performed (based upon the 1996 BOCA Basic Building Code and 1999 Connecticut Supplement): Verification that design loads conform to the minimum recommendations of the Code. Verification that other design criteria and assumptions conform to the Code and are in accordance with accepted engineering practices. Review of the geotechnical report to verify that the design has properly incorporated said recommendations. Verification that the organization of the structure is conceptually correct. Development of independent calculations for a representative fraction of systems, members and details to verify adequacy. 99604.02 Page 2 Independent Structural Review Milford, Connecticut August, 1999 Findings of Independent Structural Review It is my conclusion that the Structural Engineer of Record has adequately interpreted and applied the dead and live loads (including wind and seismic loads) required by the Code, has applied generally accepted engineering practice in his design criteria and assumptions as required by the Code, and has properly applied the Geotechnical Engineering Report recommendations. It is my professional structural opinion that the structure has been properly organized and is conceptually correct for vertical and lateral loads. I have performed independent calculations for a representative fraction of systems, members and details, and conclude that the design is adequate as required by the Code. No structural review was performed of secondary framing components or of the storage rack elements. There are no unresolved disputes between the Structural Engineer of Record and the Reviewing Engineer. Terms and Conditions of Independent Structural Review The review discussed herein has been performed in accordance with the requirements of the 1996 BOCA Basic Building Code and 1999 Connecticut Supplement, and the scope of services of the contract with the owner. No review of shop drawings has been performed. It is not the intention of this review to relieve, in any way, the responsibility of the Structural Engineer of Record for its design competence, nor is any position taken by the Reviewing Engineer relative to the architectural, plumbing, HVAC and electrical designs, life safety code issues, or zoning/land use code application. This report is wholly intended to review the application of structural engineering principles and practice issues. 99604.02 Page 3 Independent Structural Review Milford, Connecticut August, 1999 ATTACHMENT A TARGET SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT INDEPENDENT STRUCTURAL REVIEW DOCUMENT LIST Structural Calculations: by Setter Leach & Lindstrom, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota Geotechnical Engineering Studies: by Dr. Clarence Welti PE PC Glastonbury, Connecticut Architectural Drawings by Robert M. Lucius, Architect Minneapolis, Minnesota Number Title Latest Date AO Cover Sheet 1 1/07/1999 Al Floor Plan 11/07/1999 A2 Floor Finish, Blocking & Insulation Plan 1 1/07/1999 A3 Reflected Ceiling Plan 1 1/07/1999 A4 Roof Plan 11/07/1999 A5 Food Service & Entry Plan 1 1/07/1999 A5A Office & Pharmacy Plan 1 1/07/1999 A6 Food Service & Entry Reflected Ceiling Plan 1 1/07/1999 A6A Office & Pharmacy Reflected Ceiling Plan 11/07/1999 A7 Dock & Fitting Room Plans 1 1/07/1999 A7A Backroom Plan 11/07/1999 A8 Exterior Elevations 1 1/07/1999 A9 Interior Elevations 1 1/07/1999 99604.02 Page 4 Independent Structural Review Milford, Connecticut August, 1999 Number Title Latest Date A9A Sales Floor & Neon Elevations 1 1/07/1999 A10 Room Finish Schedule & Partition Types 1 1/07/1999 All Door Schedule & Details 1 1/07/1999 Al 1 A Storefront Elevations & Details 11/07/1999 Al2 Wall & Building Sections 1 1/07/1999 Al 2A Not Used Al2C Not Used A13 Roof Details 11/07/1999 A14 Dock & Compactor Details 1 1/07/1999 A14A Sidewalk Plan & Details 1 1/07/1999 A15 Exterior Details 1 1/07/1999 A16 Interior Finish Details 11/07/1999 Al 6A Interior Finish Details 1 1/07/1999 99604.02 Page 5 Independent Structural Review South Windsor, Connecticut December, 1999 Structural Drawings: by Setter Leach & Lindstrom, Inc . Minneapolis, Minnesota Number Title Latest Date S1 Foundation Plan 1 1/07/1999 S2 Roof Framing Plan 1 1/07/1999 S3 General Notes, Schedules, Dock Plan & Details 11/07/1999 S4 Foundation Details 1 1/07/1999 S5 Roof Details 1 1/07/1999 S6 Details 1 1/07/1999 99604.02 Page 6 1100 Peavey Building 730 Second Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55402-2454 architecture tel:612 338.8741 fax:612 338.4840 engineering web:www.setterleach.com interiors October 21, 1999 Mr.John Collins Chief Building Official Town of South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Subject: Mechanical Equipment Installation Requirements Dear Mr. Collins, The purpose of this letter is to document our telephone conversations on October 19, 1999.The following items were discussed: 1. Rooftop packaged air handling unit condensate drains will be directed to the roof, where it will drain to roof drains located at the rear of the store and to the storm sewer. 2. Floor drain trap primers will not be required on any floor drain. 3. The allowable sanitary slop is as stated in the 1997 International Plumbing Code. 4. The bathroom, men's and women's, exhaust can be combined with the janitor closet exhaust and will be exhausted with a single properly sized rooftop exhaust fan. 5. The grease ductwork from the Type 1 hood is not required by NFPA 96 to have a fire rated enclosure. However, the International Mechanical Code does require an enclosure. An exception to the enclosure is to wrap the ductwork with an approved through-penetration firestop system. We will wrap the with two layers of 1 1/2 inch calcium silicate refractory ceramic fiber blanket fastened with carbon steel or stainless steel banding from the hood duct interface to the exterior duct exhaust fan interface. SFTTFR LINDSTROM Mr.John Collins October 21, 1999 Page 2 architecture engineering interiors If, in your review of this letter, you find that your interpretation of any of the subject matter varies,please advise us. You can contact me at (800) 328-8664. Sincerely, Theodore M Tio Robert Kuebelbeck,AIA Mechanical Engineer Project Manager dal 9099.031.000 Store T-1249 cc: Mark Erenberg-RSP Architects Basil\vol_1\TARGET\9099\031000\OS\LTRJohn Collins 10-19-99.doc LINDSTROM 1100 Peavey Building 730 Second Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55402-2454 architecture tel:612 338.8741 fax:612 338.4840 engineering web:www.setterleach.com interiors October 8, 1999 Mr.John Collins Chief Building Official Town of South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Subject: Insulation Requirements for Target South Windsor T-1249 Dear Mr. Collins, The purpose of this letter is to describe how we determined~the wall-and roof insulation requirements for the new Target store:'The State'of Connecticut has'adopted the.BOCA Building Officials and Code Administrators) National Building Code 1996. Chapter 13 . Energy Conservation, references"the CABO `(Council of American;Building =Officials) Model Energy Code 1995. Chapter 7, Building Design for all Buildings other than Residential Buildings of CABO, references the ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers) Standard 90.1. Standard 90.1 requires that the roof have a maximum average U-value (thermal transmittance) of 0.053 Btu/h fe OF. Considering the roof construction, the insulation is required to have a minimum R-value (thermal resistance) of 17.0 h fe-'F/Btu. The required average maximum wall U-value is 0.093 Btu/h fe OF. Considering the wall construction, the insulation is required to have a minimum R-value of 7.7 h fe.'FBtu. We then calculated the required average building U-value,which is 0.061 Btu/h fe OF. In order to minimize construction costs and maximize retail space, exterior walls will not be fully insulated. Consequently, the average wall U-value is 0.137, which contravenes the required value. We propose to increase the roof insulation so that the overall building U- value meets or exceeds the required value.To achieve this;the average roof U-value:must not`exceed 0.040 Btu/h fe OF, which requires the insulation to have a minimum R-value.of 25 h fe-OF/Btu.,This,'results"in an`average building U-value, of 0.060'Btu/h ft2 OF.- The average -building U-value exceeds the required value, which results in greater energy Mr.John Collins October 8, 1999 Page 2 architecture engineering interiors savings than would occur if the building were constructed strictly following ASHRAEStandard90.1. If you have any questions regarding our calculation methods or more details concerning where insulation will be located and how much will be installed, you can contact me at 800) 328-8664 or ttiofisetterleach.com. Sincerely, Y V- Theodore M Tio Robert Kuebelbeck, AIAMechanicalEngineerProjectManager Mal 9099.031.000 Store T-1249 cc: Mark Erenberg-RSP Architects J:ITARGET\90991031000\OS\LTRJohn Collins 10-8-99.doc 1100 Peavey Building 730 Second Avenue South Minneapolis,MN 55402-2454 architecture tel:612 338.8741 fax:612 338.4840 engineering web:www.setterleach.com interiors October 4, 1999 Mr.John Collins Chief Building Official Town of South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Subject: Request for approval to revise the quantity of outside air in the sales area of the Target Store located at South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mr. Collins, The purpose of this letter is to inform you of how we intend to meet the code requirements regarding outside air quantities for the South Windsor Target store. The International Mechanical Code (IMC) 1996 Chapter 4 governs the outdoor air requirements for occupied spaces within buildings. Table 403.3 specifically deals with the quantity of outside air required for various types of occupancies. Retail stores, sales floors and showroom floors (basement and street level) shall be ventilated at a rate at 0.3 cfm/fe. Section 403.2 lists an exception that allows reductions of outside air quantities provided that containment concentrations achieved by the higher outdoor air rate are not exceeded. The basis for ventilation requirements in most building codes in the United States is ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers) Standard 62-1989. The International Mechanical Code does not specifically reference Standard 62, but the table values are identical. Standard 62 also has a performance-based procedure that is better defined than the exception of IMC Section 403.2. This performance-based procedure of Standard 62 defines concentration limits of key indoor contaminants. If sufficient ventilation is provided to maintain these concentrations below limits, acceptable air quality is obtained. Mr.John Collins October 4, 1999 Page 2 architecture engineering interiors To prove compliance with the performance procedure of Standard 62, Target contracted with the Minnesota Building Resource Center (Graduate School, University of Minnesota) to provide an indoor air quality test of a Target store sales area in Stillwater, Minnesota. The intent of the test was two fold: 1. Determine the main pollutant in the environment of a Target store sales floor area. 2. Determine the outside air quantity that would maintain acceptable indoor air quality as required by Standard 62. The test concluded that the primary pollutant is Formaldehyde and using 0.07 cfm/fe of outside air will maintain levels well bellow the 0.1 PPM that is recommended by Standard 62. A copy of the report executive summary is attached. These revised quantities of outside air will also enable the Target store to comply with the intent of ASFIRAE Standard 90.1 (Energy Efficient Design Of New Buildings Except Low- Rise Residential Buildings). We have been in contact with the State of Connecticut Department of Public Safety regarding a new Target store in Waterford, Connecticut. A copy of the State's acceptance letter is attached. We have agreed to the stipulations and will accept those stipulations for the South Windsor store. After you have had a chance to review this request, and the attached documentation, please feel free to call me at 1-800-328-8664 with any questions. We are requesting from you a letter accepting our design under IMC Section 403.2. Sincerely, Theodore M Tio Robert Kuebelbeck, AIA Mechanical Engineer Project Manager Mal 9099.031.000 Enclosure: Target Stillwater executive summary Target Waterford acceptance letter from State of Connecticut cc: Mark Erenberg-RSP Architects J:\TARGET\9099\031000\OS\LTRJohn Collins.doc 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS 078 P02 SEP 20 199 16:24r.C"/U'd i'lU:V 1 J :10 A 0Q, 7LI i i U STATE OF CONNECTICUT IDEFAR"I" OW OF P MY„IC SAFETy DIMON OF FME,EMBROL~NC'yAM BUILDING SERVICES September 15, 1999 CERTIFIED-RETURN RECEIPT Mr.Chris Romano nimm 75 Chapman Street PrOvidcnft, RI 02905 RE: M-581-99 Target Store NVVC S.R.85&I-95 Waterford, Connecticut Dear Mr. Romano: 1 have reviewed the referenced rKOM far Mdificatft of Secticu 401.2. ofthe 1996 Imenmianal Medmical Code poltion ofthc 1999 Statc Building Cade,Which states in part that mry occupiedspaceshallbeventilaWbyna#ural means is with Section 402 or mechanical nmcou inaccordancewithSection403. It is my decision to approve this snodificattOk as roqucsted,with the following stipulations: The muAi*dl building official be provided with a detailed analysis of the anticipatedcontatntaaatshiZbtspacetobeventilated, the acceptable occupant exposure lMts oroa0WJratianlforthosecSWthemcaosandnwthodstoocantrolthecofitamioanu. Also,an dasip critcTia and aS9UnTd=made regarding oMpIncy cauditxons,equipm owsystam pazform ace andants. 2. A schedule uvq table to tig municipal buildig oMe al of ta,rbg after Occupe lay withmerchandiseinplacetodetcnnimeornplia=. or any corrective acdon ifnarasary. This decision is baW on the ext Melon W Smden 403.2. Ifyou haveY any quesnons,please eentad etc at(860)6$5.8310, U, YYours. w Darnel J. Tiomey Supervisor Public Safety Building Official DJT:DZ:pm cc: Prank Hm818nd III,Waterford Building Official 1111 Covatry Club Road P.O.Boot 2W4 Middletown,CT 06457.9294 A4 Egrta!oppodud{yEmployer APPLICATION OF ASHRAE STANDARD 62-1989 IAQ PERFORMANCE METHOD TO DETERMINE REQUIRED VENTILATION IN A TARGET STORE Barry B. Bridges', Daniel E. Hadlich', David T. Grimsrud', Neil Carlson Minnesota Building Research Center-University of MinnesotaDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealthandSafety-University of Minnesota EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We Ventilation requirements for commercial buildings in the United States must satisfyASHRAEStandard62-1989 in most jurisdictions. The standard consists of two major compliance paths. The first, called the ventilation rate procedure, defines ventilation requirements for various types of buildings depending on their use. If the ventilation rates specified in this prescriptive procedure are provided, acceptable air quality is presumed to result. The second path is called the indoor air quality (IAQ) procedure. This 'performance-based' procedure defines concentration limits of key indoor contaminants. If sufficient ventilation is provided to maintain concentrations below these limits, acceptable air quality is obtained. This study has explored the performance procedure in a long term study ofventilationandairqualityinatypicalTargetStorelocatedinStillwater, MN. The work was done by MnBRC; the Principal Investigator of the project was DavidGrimsrud. MnBRC has been involved in,indoor air quality, energy efficiency,building systems analysis and design development research and service projectssince1989. Dr. Grimsrud was vice-chairman of.the revision committee that wrote Standard 62-1989 for ASHRAE. He lis'currently a member of the committee that is revising 62-1989; he also serves as the-chair of the subcommittee that responds to interpretation requests-about the standard. This study examined ventilation and*indoor air quality during four week-longmeasurementperiodsatthreemonthintervalsforoneyearintheTargetStore. The results show that indoor air quality in the Target Store meet the Standard 62-1989 performance-based'procedure requirements with ventilation rates lower. than the 0.3 cfm/ft2 specified in the 'prescriptive' portion of the Standard. Page 1 INTRODUCTION Both the designer and building owner are concerned about choosing the proper amount of outdoor ventilation air to supply in a building. This is an important issue for the designer who must specify equipment that can supply the proper ventilation required by code. The owner is concerned because the cost of conditioning and moving ventilation air can be a substantial fraction of the total energy cost of the building. The basis for most ventilation requirements in building codes in the United States is a set of ventilation standards published by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). This series, designated Standard 62, has been updated about once each decade. For some building types and uses, Standard 62-1989 uses substantially higher ventilation rates than those contained in the previous version, Standard 62-1981. This is the case for retail spaces. The ventilation rate prescribed in the standard for retail spaces increased from 0.15 cfm/ft2 to 0.3 cfm/ft2 on basement and street level sales floors. The increase is the result of committee judgment about the strength of pollutant sources in retail spaces. It is not based on occupant density, the dominant pollutant source for most building types in Standard 62-1989. This report describes measurements performed and discusses results obtained from an investigation of the ventilation and indoor air quality performance of a Target store located in Stillwater, Minnesota. The authors employed the performance-based procedure that exists in Standard 62- 1989 to examine spaces in which unusually strong or weak pollutant sources exist. This 'performance-based' method, called the indoor air quality (IAQ) procedure, allows a building owner to demonstrate compliance with the standard through field measurements of pollutant concentrations rather than 'prescriptive' ventilation rates. The employed IAQ procedure included analysis of pollutant and ventilation measurements taken over an entire year to include seasonal weather changes and mixes of displayed products. The analysis indicates that acceptable pollutant concentrations (as described in Standard 62-1989) are possible with ventilation rates less than the Standard 62-1989 prescriptive value of 0.3 cfm/ft2 in Target Stores. Page 2 MEASUREMENTS The Standard 62-1989 IAQ procedure calls for measurements of all critical pollutants in order to assure appropriate indoor air quality at a modified ventilation rate. Measurements performed in the retail store were based on discussions with industrial hygienists. Critical contaminants were determined through previous measurements, information about product stock, cleaning procedures and occupancy in the retail space. Additionally, the retail store, was completed in mid- 1994, and thus had gone through its initial off-gassing phase. In this study we have elected to use the guideline limits recommended in the public review draft of the revised Standard 62. These are listed in Table C-1 of Appendix C in the public review draft (ASHRAE, 1996). Pollutants measured were formaldehyde, carbon dioxide (CO2)1 carbon monoxide (CO), particle concentration and size distribution, selected organic compounds and total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs). Environmental parameters sampled included temperature, relative humidity and differential pressures between various points in the store and outdoors. Ventilation rates were measured using SF, tracer decays (ASTM, 1993). These measurements were verified independently using both flow hood measurements and temperature differences between the outdoor air, return air and mixed air streams. There are no federally mandated standards for indoor air pollutants. Common practice and building codes use the guidelines described in Section 6.2.1 of ASHRAE 62-1989. The guidelines listed apply the National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS) to the indoor environment; also adds four pollutants: CO2, chlordane, ozone and radon listed in Table 3 of ASHRAE 62-1989; then suggests that additional pollutants and guidelines be selected from Appendix C of ASHRAE 62-1989. The following table presents the guideline limits from the 1996 ASHRAE 62 public review draft for those contaminants chosen as pollutants of concern for this study. Table 1:Guideline Limits for Pollutants of Concern Contaminant Concentration of Interest Note CO 9 ppm average 8 hour exposure HCHO 120 /m3(100 b) 30 minute exposure Odors(CO2)1000 ppm Particles (PM3) 50 µ /m3 24 hour exposure Total Volatile C<300 µg/m3 complaints unlikely semi-quantitative measure Organic Compounds 300<C<3000 µg/m3 complaints possible of indoor pollution. TVOC) C>3000 µg/m3 complaints likely C>1000µg/m3 determine C > 1000 µ /m3 trigger further analysis individual compounds. Page 3 VENTILATION Ventilation measurements were performed using SF6 tracer decays. Measurements were made at multiple points in the main retail area of the store and additionally atlocationswithinthezoneabovetheretailarea's suspended ceiling and in thestockroom. This coupled three zone system is defined by a set of coupled differentialequationswhichdefinetheventilationinthestore (Hernandez and Ring, 1982). Measured SF6 data are modeled by inserting flow values into these differential equations from which the airflow from outdoors into each inside zone can becalculated. The combination of these values yields the total outdoor air supplied tothestorebytheventilationsystemandthroughinfiltration. This is the air whichdilutesthepollutantsinthestore. Results of the tracer decay were consistent with results obtained by flow hood measurements and temperature based measurementsduringtestingperiods. Control of outdoor air quantity is not a simple adjustment.Nonetheless, the damper settings resulted in outdoor air rates that were close tothoseintended. DISCUSSION The measurements described above comprise a measurement set. This set wasrepeatedthreetimesintheinitialsequence; then two times each at three monthintervalsforoneyear (November 1995 - September 1996). The span of measurement periods permits evaluation of pollutants from the varied retail product mixes present during each different season. These periods were also spread out over a one year period to sample Minnesota's climate with its warm, humid summers and cold winters. The four measurement periods are referred to as first,second, third and fourth quarterly measurement periods. The multiple measurement sets performed during each of the four quarterlymeasurementperiodscorrespondtodifferentventilationrates. The intended ventilation values ranged between 10% and 30% outdoor air. These intended percentages were set by an HVAC Test and Balance contractor. The actual result wasthenmeasuredmorepreciselybytracergasdecayandtestedforconsistencyusingconventionalflowhoodandthermalbalancemeasurements. Thus, for each measurement set, there are corresponding contaminant and ventilation measurements. Similar management procedures (care and cleanliness), and minor regional variations in merchandise may allow simple extrapolation of the results in this study to other buildings which are nearly identical. The contaminant levels seen in this store differed during a quarterly test set because of the changes made to the ventilation rate. Comparisons between quarterly test sets with similar ventilation rates indicate a variance in the measurements that are due to weather, cleaningpracticesandmixofproductsondisplay. The application of these findings to other Target Store locations is possible because the air distribution systems, productsdisplayedandmanagementpracticesareconsistentacrossallstores. Page 4 MEASUREMENT RESULTS Temperature, humidity, particles, CO and CO2 were measured continuously. The variations over a day relate to human activity and are shown in the quarterlyreports. In the following figures, the average value of each measurement performed in the retail area is presented for each of the 9 measurement periods. Furthermore, the amount of outdoor air measured by tracer gas decay wasdeterminedforseveralinjectionsandtheaverageispresented. Except for temperature and humidity there is an inverse relation between the concentrationmeasuredandtheflowrateofoutdoorair. The specific values used for the following charts are presented in Table 2 which follows this discussion.c Differential Pressure Differential pressure measurements revealed that the retail area of the store consistently remains at a higher pressure than outdoors even during the nighttimehours. The retail area of the store also remains at a consistently higher pressurethanthestockroomandtheareaabovetheretailarea's suspended ceiling. Temperature Indoor Temperature vs. Outside Air (CFM) Indoor air temperatures averaged 7 4 between 68 and 75 °F during store v 73 let Quarter 2nd Quarter open hours (8:00 AM to 10:00 PM) m 7 2 3rd Quarter regardless of the season of the year. 71 ath Quarter 70 M 69 68 67 CFM 0 10,000 200000 30,000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 O.A. Relative Humidity Indoor Relative Humidity vs. Outside Air (CFM) Relative humidity measurements 6 0 varied greatly from season to season 5 0 eat Qum 2nd Quarter 8% - 60%). With averages in the 4 0 srd Quarter winter slightly below the desired 3 0 4th Quarter level for comfort. 20 10 0 CFM 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.A. Page 5 PM3 Indoor Particles (PM,) vs. Outside Air (CFM) The smaller three micron particle is a 50 _______________ greater concern for respiratory w 40 ( 24hour) end Quarter damage than the 10 micron size. The E 3rd Qurtera annual and 24 hour guidelines are 3 0 04tn Quarter shown with a nearly undetected 2 0 (annual) value for the store. Typical nightly a 10 maximum PM3 concentrations 0 ranged from 10 to 20 µg/m3; CFM 0 100000 20,000 30,000however, concentrations exceeded 50 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 µg/m3 on several occasions. As 0.A. discussed in the CO section the nightly operation of a propane-powered burnisher was a strong source of carbon monoxide and particles. CO and particle concentrations were very low after the nightly spikes were diluted. No other obvious sources of CO or particles wereidentified. Carbon Dioxide(CO2)Indoor Carbon Dioxide vs. Outside Air (CFM) 1200 Iat er Daily increases in carbon dioxide 1000 ——————___ end Quarter were observed duringstore hours as A w Quarter a. 8 0 0 4th Quarter occupancy increased; however, CO, 6 0 0 concentrations remain below any o 4 0 0 A guideline values [1000 ppm] for all 2 0 0 Outside Ave.) ventilation rates tested. 0 CFM 0 10,000 20,000 309000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.A. Formaldehyde (HCHO) Indoor Formaldehyde vs. Outside Air (CFM) Formaldehyde concentrations during 14 0 120 ---------- •1st Quartereachofthequarterlymeasurementa2,d Quarter periods remained below 40 9g/m3 (33 100 A3rd Quarter ppb) for all outdoor air settings. The o s o 4th Quarter concentration of interest is 120 µg/m3 =40vwhichisequivalentto100ppb. 2 0 CFM 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.A. Page 6 Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC) TVOC measurement procedures are of particular interest due to some variations between different sampling methods. This study employed a scan for commonly found organic compounds sampled in store at five locations using 3M Model 3500 passive organic vapor badges. Two badges were placed at each interior location for 48 hours. The two badges were combined into one sample during analysis to improve sensitivity. The same procedure was used for the outdoor measurement and control samples. Analysis of the badges was performed by Braun Intertec. Volatile organic compound (VOC) measurement results were broken down into more than 25 different chemical components. Only those VOC's with concentrations above the detection limit were reported. These included toluene, butoxyethanol, ethanol, isopropanol, methyl-ethyl-ketone (MEK), cyclo-hexanone, benzene, d-limonene, and acetone. Elevated concentrations of d-limonene help explain a larger than expected TVOC result during the fourth quarter period. D-limonene is a constituent in some cleaning products. A cleaning product containing d-limonene was used extensively by store employees during this measurement period. One constituent of the TVOC signal is the d-limonene from this source. TVOC concentrations were below the Indoor Total VOC vs. Outside Air (CFM) threshold of concern for all tests. A 12 0 0 concentration of TVOC greater than a 1000 ————————— •1at Quarter 1000 µg/m3 is an indication of E 8 0 0 2nd Quarter concern and further testing should be atn Quarter done to identify the individual 0 soo 4 0 0 volatile organic compounds causing A the high reading.200 N M • 0 TVOC is the most useful CFM 0 10,000 209000 309000 measurement parameter due to its CFMisF 0 0.11 0JL 0.21 0.32 higher toxicity and its clear response related to changes in ventilation rate. Therefore, TVOC would be the best candidate to confirm appropriate design application in another Target Store. Analysis of TVOC concentrations in stores in different locations would provide a leading indicator contaminant test of acceptability. Low TVOC concentrations would indicate that other contaminants will be low, and adequate ventilation is present. TVOC concentrations that exceed the guideline could be the result of inadequate ventilation, excessive source strength or both. Thus, the TVOC test indicates acceptability but does not identify a cause (excessive source strength or inadequate ventilation or both) if it fails. Page 7 Carbon Monoxide (CO) All pay Average Indoor Carbon Monoxide vs. Outside Air (CFM) Average CO readings for all day, store 1 °1 at uartsr open and store closed time periods 2nd Quarter are shown in the figures. s 3rdQuarter as 6 4th Quarter wo O 4 C 2 0 CFM 0 100000 20,000 309000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 c• 0.A. With the store closed, the typical Store-Closed Carbon Monoxidestore-wide CO concentrations reached vs. Outside Air (CFM) 20 ppm nightly with a maximum of 59 ppm. CO and particle 1° —_— Z ————— 2nd Quarter Quarter' concentrations were very low after e nightly burnisher spikes were a s i 3ra Quarter diluted. No other obvious sources of '" 4 atn Quarter CO or particles were identified. c° 2 0 CFM 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.A. Store-Open Carbon Monoxide During the occupied hours of the day vs. Outside Air (CFM) the concentrations were lower, but 1 ° still high enough to reveal the Iat Quarter residual effects of the nighttime 8 uarter 3rdQuarter burnisher use. The day time average a s ad,Quarter CO concentration is below the O 4 concern level. V 2 0 CFM 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 CFM/SF 0 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.A. Page 8 The following table represents the numerical values of data presented in each of the preceding figures. Table 2: Measurement Results for Retail Area of Target Store. Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Date 11/14/95 11/15/95 11/16/95 3/1-3/2 2/28-2/29 6/19-6/20 6/21-6/22 9/25-9/29 9/30-10/1 Intended O.A.%10%20%30% 10%20%10%20%10%20% Measured m3/hr 9,200 29,000 41.000 14,400 19,600 14 400 25 400 11 000 23 000 Measured CFM 5,400 17,000 24,000 8,500 11,550 8,500 15,000 6 500 13,500 Measured O.A.% 8% 24%33% 12%16%12%21% 9% 16% Measured CFM/s .ft. .06 18 26 09 12 09 16 07 12 CO 1st Quarter 4.9 3.3 2.2 m 2nd Quarter 3.3 3.1 3rd Quarter 5.8 2.3 4th Quarter 5.3 3.6 CO2 1st Quarter 720 590 550 ppm) 2nd Quarter 680 610 3rd Quarter 570 520 4th Quarter 580 470 PM2 1st Quarter gg/M3 2nd Quarter 4.4 3.6 3rd Quarter 5.6 2.2 4th Quarter 3.7 3 HCHO 1st Quarter 20 14 12 gg/W) 2nd Quarter 12.8 9.9 3rd Quarter 37 26 4th Quarter 32.3 28.2 VOC 1st Quarter 640 230 30 m' 2nd Quarter 240 160 3rd Quarter 370 190 4th Quarter 690 400 Temp. 1st Quarter 70.2 68.6 67.7 F 2nd Quarter 70.9 70 3rd Quarter 72.8 72.8 4th Quarter 73.3 72.1 R.H. 1st Quarter 19.3 19.4 15.9 2nd Quarter 9.5 9.4 3rd Quarter 51.6 47.9 4th Quarter 37.2 33.2 Open CO 1st Quarter 4.21 1.97 1.72 m 2nd Quarter 3.2 2.58 3rd Quarter 2.43 1.61 4th Quarter 3.92 2.4 Close CO 1st Quarter 6.03 5 2.97 m 2nd Quarter 3.47 3.94 3rd Quarter 8.57 3.08 4th Quarter 7.02 5.09 Page 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors of this report gratefully acknowledge Mr.James Boler of Dayton-Hudson Corporationforsupportingthisprojectthroughcontractnumber9606137. We also thank James Boler and Bill George for helpful discussions, and the employees of the Stillwater,Minnesota store(with special mention to Gary Anderson)for considerable patience and help. REFERENCES ASHRAE(1996) Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality-Public Review Draft,Atlanta, GA,American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAEStandard62-1989R). ASHRAE(1989) Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality,Atlanta,GA,American Society ofHeating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE Standard 62-1989). ASTM(1993)Standard Test Methodsfor DeterminingAir Change in a Single Zone by Means ofaTracerGasDilution,Philadelphia,PA,American Society for Testing and Materials(StandardDesignationE741-93). Bridges B.B., Hadlich, D.E., Carlson N. and Grimsrud D.T. (1997)Evaluation of Ventilation andIndoorAirQualityinaRetailStore-Quarterly Reports,Minnesota Building Research Center, University of Minnesota,February 1997. Hernandez,T.L. and Ring,J.W. (1982) "Indoor radon source fluxes: experimental tests of a two- chamber model",Environment International, 8,45-57. Page 10 Target Store Ventilation and IAQ Key Parameters Design Specifications Retail Above Ceiling Office Storage Length feet 376 376 204 200 Width feet 248 248 50 72 Height feet 14 6.5 10 18 Floor Area Wl 93,250 93,250 10,200 14,400 Net Volume ft3 1,2301000 606,000 102,000 255,000 CFM Total ** 72,000 5,000 duct leak 10150 11,250 CFM O.A. ** 7,200 500 1,020 1,125 CFM O.A./s .ft. ** 0.077 0.005 0.1 0.89 ACH ** 0.33 0.05 0.6 0.29 Net Open Volume=Gross Volume 1,305,000 cu.ft.less shelving and display rack outline 14000 0 0.6 paddng factDr=75,000 cu.ft Note: These are'design'values. Actual findings are discussed in the final report. Critical Contaminant TVOC is the contaminant class that is closest to guideline limits in our measurement. Therefore, it becomes the critical contaminant that determines the ventilation requirements for the store. According to ASHRAE,TVOC concentrations between 300 and 3000 µg/m3 complaints are possible, and values above 1000 µg/m3 are elevated enough to consider further investigation. Extrapolating from conditions found during each testing period: Airflow for 600 µg/m3 TVOC in Retail Area Measurement Period Qtr. 1 Qtr. 2 Ott. 3 Qtr. 4 Average Air Change Per Hour ACH 0.35 0.16 0.27 0.36 0.29 Cubic Feet Per Minute CFM 7,430 3 400 5,530 7 550 5 980 Percent Outdoor Air %11 5 8 11 8.75 CFM Per Square Foot 08 03 06 08 06 Formulae 0 Temperature calculation for OA% = RA—OA x 100 t 1 F (Note: 1°F is temp.sensor accuracy)RA DA Contaminant concentration: C=S/Q=source strength/airflow rate Air-flow conversions for the test store three-zone volume(1,900,000 ft3): 10%O.A. =0.08 CFM/sq.ft.=0.24 ACH=7,400 CFM O.A. Definitions ACH: Air Changes per Hour. CFM: Cubic Feet of Air per Minute. OA: Outdoor Air Temp. DA: Discharge Air Temp. RA: Return or Space Air Temp. Performance IAQ: Measured concentrations of specific contaminants to be below acceptable values for a particular operation of HVAC systems. PM.: Particle mass at or below 3 microns. This measure permits useful analysis, because one large particle does not skew the data. PPM/PPB: Concentrations are measured as number of molecules (parts) per million or per billion molecules of air. Conversions Irom these units to µg/m3 and other convenient units are possible. Prescriptive IAQ: Follow a formula in design and construction for guideline CFM O.A./sq.ft. Sulfur Hexafloride (SF,): A unique man-made gas, easily detected and measured at a very low concentration;considered harmless at the range of our measurement which is below 200 ppb. TVOC:Total volatile organic compounds(TVOC)is a mass measure of all VOCs found in a sample. Orl M it,t C r. T-Own O s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 July 13, 2000 CERTIFIED#P462498103 Arnco Sign Co.,Inc. 1133 South Broad Street . , Wallingford, CT 06492 Re: Appl. #2468-00—Arnco Sign Co.,Inc., representing Target Store's, 125 Buckland Hills Drive,Manchester, CT., GD zone To Whom It May Concern: At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board ofAppeals held on July 6, 2000,the Board approved with conditions your request for a variance to section 17.8.5 a to allow a free standing sign to be 48 square feet(24 square feet allowed). The Board concluded the hardship to be that if the sign were not erected, a traffic safety issue would arise. The conditions placed on this approval are as follows: 1. The bottom portion of the sign to be made of masonry brick, which will match the building. 2. No other business to be placed on the sign other than in the area identified as Lowes and Target Stores. 3. Illumination of the sign to be consistent with what was stated in the application. At the meeting the Board also approved your request for a variance to section 17.8.5 b to allow a second building sign approximately 60 square feet, at 125 Buckland Hills Drive, Manchester, CT., GD zone. The Board concluded the same hardship - if this sign were not erected there would be a traffic safety issue. Any new building, or alteration/additions to existing buildings, requires a building permit prior to start of construction. Arnco Sign Co., Inc. Representing Target Store's July 13, 2000 Page 2 These actions are effective upon your filing the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's Office at your own expense. Very truly yours, Don 1AC0 I Z Wkj-r- Marjorie Anthony, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals MA:dr cc: Building Department a 6126777102 PSP APCHITECTS e45 P01 SEP 29 100 13:43 Robert M.Lucius,Architect 120 First Avenue North Minneapolis,MN 55401 r'AX roy 2-00"760 12439-0313 Facsimile Transmittal Date. Comm. No: b FAX Number: Number of Pages'(including this sheet): 2!? 7a: 44014 Gay. ! l Company: 7-Okog Farr,• MA)e A(v n-//7 Description: AAPAOmJ&O;r'o ToAA4610 "OCA& 7ar SOL" W lAlt)SOPOM, 0 J6-4*" %qTAjSAj&Jt dople PMM%Z;1wJAL Message. 1 YOU 4aU ' t, A No f 4.C. qZ l^ *T N aA14 IRA L 'mrYOU 111A MMOOPAeooViL. p C-PWA16-6X /;5 UPA04,6- -7';0 1914Y "MIZ "ta/hS,/t YL HX R57UPOS IMP NIZ OPIWIZoS 90M MdNOA eAir.T 2, r, Tt9d- 4*1410AL 'rOL OAC Vth- P4/4,4,, OLer "MY6 qSEA Lo AAO T4*NA"5 &000 THd. 15T*VC*AAL S*We454- Ift Z' AS mar*C* L io 4KJP% V IZIAA L kodllffoe*4 If there are any problems with this transmission,or if you wish to reply,contact 612-339-0313 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS 945 P02 SeP 29 100 13:44 STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION PROJECT:Sough Windsor,CT: T-1249 LOCATION: Buckland Hilts Drive and Buckland Road, South Windsor, CT OWNER: Target Corporation Property Development OWNERS ADDRESS: 1 000 Nicollet Mull,Minneapolis,MN 55403 ARCHITECT OF RECORD: Robert M.Lucius,AJ.A. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD: Charles M.Ault,P-F. GENERAL CONTRACIOR: Mark Hopkins; Konover Construction To the best of our information,knowledge,and belief Target Store T-1249, located at Buckland Hills Drive and Buckland Road, South Windsor,CT is in:cub*.tamtia,l compliance with the approved plans on file with the'South Windsor Building Official. The attached Site Observation Metros,based on the architectural site visit of28 September 2000,and the structural site visit of 15 and 16 June 2000, form the basis for,mid are to be cunsidcrud ati hiteg,cal Pali of this Statement of Professional opinion. The General Contractor is responsible for completing or correcting work not in compliance with the Contract i.)ocuments or approved atternates. Ir () r.. CQ. kO0• k` M' • 4P SIR. 5 s Architcct Structural Engineer Date: dro Date:_, General Contractor: Date: eW.No.: ,aat,00 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS 945 P03 SEP 29 100 13:44 kabert M . Lucius Architect COMM.NO: 9099.032.01 Copy: Bill Penk-Target Corp. CLIENT: Target/Mervyn's Stores Dan W illenbring-Target Corp. FROJECTz South Windsor,CT;T. 1249 Mich Morrison-Target Corp. Mark Hopkins-Konover SU ECT: Architectural Field Report#I Mw-k Sulwfuhik- SLL MEMO BY: Mark Erenberg Craig R. Johnson- SLL DATE: 29 September 20 0 ' Jim Buss- SLL Robert M.Lucius-RML BK,-RML File 7 TIME: 12:30 p.m. ESTDAATED COMPLETION: 99% WEATHER: Cloudy TEMPERATURE: 65°t The following observations were made for Target T-1249-Huckland Hills Drive and buckland Road, South Windsor,CT on 28 September 2000. WORK IN PROGRESS: The construction work can the building is nearly complete except for a small amount of punahlist type work. Some of the work being done includes: Painting of truck dock doors fainting and touch-up painting of roof hatch,metal access panels Adjustment of door hardware Adjustment of EAS pedestal alarms Installation of walkway pads around roof top equipment Connection of light fixtures in Pharmacy Restraam 127 Connection of Targefs security system equipment The lattice above planters is being installed on the exterior wall The construction work on the site is nearly complete. Electrical connections for the site pylon sign are being made. Landscape materials are being installed in planting areas and drain the Is being installed behind the building. The parking lot is striped,landscaped and pole mounted lighting is installed. OBSERVATIONS: 1. Sidewalk control joints at the entry have not heen instal led. 2. The slope of the front sidewalk at the east end is revised from the plan. A handrail has been added where the curb is more than G inches higher than the pavement. This solution is acceptable. Robert M.LUCIUS,AIA 120 First Avenue North,Minneapolis, Minnesota 65401 FAX 612 -330-6700 TEL 612.339.0313 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS E45 PO4 SEP 25 100 13.45 MEMORANDUM Amliket;tural Field Report No. 1 -South Windsor,CT 29 September 2000 Page 2 3. Are access panel steeds to be installed in the gypsum board furring at the rainwater conductor on the rear wall approximately 10 feet east of Grid 2. 4. Exterior bollards by the gas meter at right sidewall need to be.painted. S. Exterior access panel at the rainwater conductor on rear wall near Grid 7 needs to be painted. ti. The following doors do not appear to have all the required clearance for accessibility at the latch side of Doors 111, 157,and 158 where a minirnum of F-6"clearance is dimensioned on plan. 7. The Kiosk on the front sidewalk needs to be completed. COMMENTS AND 0-RSER V ATTOWIR: l. All work yet to be completed and changes required by the observations above should be completed in accordance with the Contract Documents or approved alternates. 2. We recommend that the Contractor document in writing,action taken regarding any of the observations listed in this memo. Contractor alternatives should be submitted for review prior to installation. 3. Exclusion of any items from this memo does not relieve the Contractor from compliance with the Contract Documents. Please contact us ifwe can be of any further assistance. AdWdp Tar er9l/new/S1v ndsar/M'o'9AfRE 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS 945 P05 SEP 29 100 13:45 1 SETTER Memoran&m LEACH LINDSTROM 1100 Icwcy MdinS 730 Saord Avem*South Miftma"lis,MN 55402.3454 archi e e re tok 612 33114741 lax:612 336.4940 engineering Twb:wwvw.merk%eh.eom interiors tOMANSSION 6 9099.032.000 cuwr Target pFnw:cr Target South Windsor,CT su*r Structural Site Observation a sY Richard Graves DATE June 23,2000 fo Lean Willenbring,Target PM Rich Morrison,Target OSR Mark Hopkins,Konover Raquel Rudquist,Target PA Mary Erenberg,RSP PA MFSSAa The conditions recorded for the South Windsor store(r-1249)were observed.onjune 15 and 16, 20M. Present on site were Bob Smedley and Mark Hcypkins,Konover Comw zon Company. The strums site observadon is normally scheduled to coincide with the completion of the majority of the structural systems. Lhx to construction delays and mquencing,the site observation was conducted approximately 2 weeks before it would typiagy be conducted in order that the roof dock installation could be observed prior to being covered by the roofing materials. General Construction S=s: 1. The perimeter masonry walls were approximately /o complete. 'Work was in progress in the vicuuty of the loading dock. 2. The steel roof Ewing was approximately 76%complete. Work was ui progress in the viu.Uty ofthe laaduig duck and the main enay. 3. The steel roofdeck installation was approximately 70%c plete. installation of rooms material beginning. 4. The interior concrete floor slab was approc tely 30%complete. Work wu in progms. Observations: In general,the work appeared to comply with the intent of the Contract Documents,except as indicated below. 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS 945 P06 SEP 29 100 13'46 08r?3/00 Page 2 of4 1. Reference Fouadadm flan}1/51,and Deter.IW54. Measurements were taken to determine the location of the Maim entry cokxmrs relative to the front w4. The distance from the inside face of the Mont wall to the centerline of the coluum meamed perpendicular to the fioont wall,was 17- In accordance with 1151,this mraqirPmWnr chrnikl have been 11". 2. Reference Detail fi1S5. Severaljoists along Gridsj and 12 were not centered on the bearing plate. S. The anchor bolts on the east side of the column at theinter cdon ofGri&j and 12 did not extend above the bast plate. 4. Reference Detail 13156. One pair ofstiffs=plates were missing at tic beam-to-joist girder connecdorns at two locadons,the' on of Crids C and 3,and the intersection of Grids F and 11, 5. Reference Roof Framing Plan,1/S2. The bottom chord of thejoist girder markedjG-14 was damaged near the cdhamn at the intdcsearon of Grids D and 12. 6. T a rear anchor bolts at the cohums at the intersection of Grids C and 1 and the intersection ofGrids B.4 and 1 were not v sNe above the trip of the pier. 7. Reference Detail&55. 1"diameter pigrs wise not uWMUCd at d=uitciscc:tiuit ur Gikla D and 6. 8. Reference Detail 31Sb SIM. Did not observe the 3/8 x 4 Y.F-0"plates at thejoists with axial load along Grid 10. 9. Reference Deud 265 MI. The L2x2xl/4 angles were typically not installed at thejoist girders along Grid D. 10. Reference Details 60,7155 and 21/S5. The roof deck ledger angle splice plates were typkaly not Seri. 11, Reference Detail 2/56. There were tots few sidelap fasteners perjoist span in the roof deck in zones B,C and D. 12. Reference Detail 23/S6. Roof deck lap at constr caonrwNnginnjointalnngCTrid6was welded prior to installation of roofing materi . JATARGE1\909%03 CorrlrYtiS3ibri l9099A32 0 0 6126777102 RSP ARCHITECTS S45 P07 SEP 29 100 13:46 G l23NOa page3of4 13, Deference Detail 7155. The roofdeck ledges'angle at two locations on Grid,,between Grids 1 and 2 and betty om Grids 12 and 13,was idled such that the vertical leg was below the ho&=W leg. A,a result,these sections of ledger angle could not be spliced with adjarent rtinnq in arrnrdanrr with Detail 91 A5. Quimialu wid RC."L:Ci Wit2LJAd wLs; For Observation Numbered 1: locate column as specified in the Contract Drawings. Submit alternate detail for Wrinection between colurnu base plate and pier to this office for review. For Obscrvatk=Nuvibcmd 2: The inc mascd masonry bearing s&cs=caused by the caccnaic joist loads were adadated acid were determined to be in accords with the applicable design code. 1heretbre,it is our opinion that corrective action is not required. For Observations Numbered 3 and 6: Submit alternate detail for connection between column base plate to this office for review. Y For Observations Numbered 4, 71 8,9, 10 and 11: Complete work in accordance with the Contract Documents. D Fnr Ohsemtion Numbered 5- A-ubmit dactimentatic+n ofdamge to' 'st girder to Fahringtor for review and direction regarding necmny repairs,if required.Submit documentation of W.;Uuii utkrtt Cu this uMtx. For Observation Numbered 12: The purpose of the comtruction eXpa Won joint is to prevent age to,or separation betwwi,the roof deck and supporting roof sttuetue caused by thermal expariion and contraction of the roof deck over the entire width of the building during construction. According to Detail 231S6,this joint i3 to be weldcd after the roofing mataW 1u bew installed. Separating the welch between the deck and structure would have caused significant damage to the roof beck. An alternate e'xparmion could have been meted,but this would have resulted in a suit delay in the construction schedule: Since the deck is designed to be continuous over three spares,a strip of deck approximately 18'wide would have been required to be repLued over the entire depth of the building. Although no damage was evkleru at the time of the site;visit,we recommend that conditions be mai utored for sign of distress. The deck may need to be repaired if damage develops. For Observation Numbered 13: Submit alternate splice detail to this office for review. ATARGEr\% 32pOGWS\MM\062300rlQ4x Comr !ssion#MA3= 125777102 RSP ARCHITECTS e45 P02 SEP 29 100 13!4 QWZ30 PBge 4Of4 All work should be completed in accordance with the Contract 1 kxmmmts or approved altemates. We recommend that the contractor doo=cnt in wieW action taken regarding the recomnwndations listed in this memo. Contractor alternates should be submitted for review prior to4UtallaA . Exclusion of any items from this memo does not relieve the contractor from cgnpliace with the Conna Doammm Please contact ua if we'can be of any further assistance. Photographs taken dtuing the site visit am on fik in our ofiirx and availabk for reference. Richard Graves Mark G.She PE Project Structural Engineer Project Manager Artad=cat dal J erat M9o9gw32WWS\MM 3WftAck c comet inn sA3 mo nVl IVVCI Construction Corporation September 22, 2000 John Collins Town of South Windsor Building Department 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 RE: Target Store No. T-1249 (B99-030-01) South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Collins, Please be advised that Konover Construction Corporation has completed all work in substantial compliance with the approved construction documents, on file with the Town of South Windsor, as prepared by Robert M. Lucius, Architect, for Target Store No. T-1249, at 20 Buckland Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. Sincerely, 4Mark opki KONOVER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Project Manager cc: Mike Tighe File K:\99030\corrmisc.Misc007.rgw Mailing Address:P.O.Box 4052,Farmington,CT 06034-4052 Business Office: 16 Munson Road,Farmington,CT 06032 Phone:860.284.7110 Fax:860.284.1174 www.konoverconstruction.com Connecticut Maryland Florida 09/29/2000 15:04 FAX 860 284 1174 BONOVER CONSTRUCTION 17i001/042 KONOVER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 16 Munso[l Road Farmington, C`:T 0FO.12 860) 284-7110 Mailing Address-- P.O. Box 4052 Farmington, CT 06034-4052 FAA,CSIMILE COVER SHE To: M10141,44 cam" . cornpany: Phone: Fax: 44 '51 1 From: tf`. Company: K angf.ructinn C-orporatioe Phoue: (860) 284-7110 Fax: (860) 284-1174 bate_ 1-I Pages including this cOVer page: Z-0 Comments: 09/29/2000 15:05 FAX 860 284 1174 KONOVER CONSTRUCTION Z 002/002 STRUCTURAT. eiN Rs Final Report ofSpgC-,aj Ins e nss, COALITION PIUVATE rRACTfCE rO1ed T-12490 Target South Windsor, CT LGptiW l: RElckl ud i£11 s Di iv'e 4ud.Suukland Road o SOUCh Wlnd&or, Ur Target Corporation Uwners Address; 1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis 5 40I1 I 5 Architect of Rid: Robert X. Luaiva Sttuctural Engineer of Record; Charles M. Aul t TO the b"t of my a-to!4i1atioa, knee 3W Defier, the SWjW InspeelonG,mired iremt ed in the Veterner of S ! !ins this 1 end dou ered 1iscre f P Avdions' submkted *W pemmk have n perponciic ic rmed and,have been r09:sled gild reSWVBO oMer VW#tin#odi&W ng: Attach cominuation sheets ifrequrre#'to complete the de=jp kn ofow #rons Werim reports submftted prior to this final report form a basis for and are to be considered eri.this rhX1 foacort. WeAml part of R.MeM.fidly submIted per Ins-Peclor tii iiiirNfir a. GO ' figw0 T.1rpc or print n e e sfar t, M.. r SECICT Form 102 Final Rqmt of$pedal!nPodko rs ecACICT I OC,TT nn a nni fN,M•. MYw TT/s,vn v I1 r e•-,•••s• .+. ti.:. r ALL STATE FIRE EQUIPMENT Co. INC FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALIST OFFICE(860)585-8885P.O. Box 9262 BRISTOL, CT 06011-9262 FAX(860) 589-2225 August 17, 2000 To Whom it May Concern, I Michael Gagner CT. Lic. #F30042, give Gary Monterville permission to pull a FireSuppressionSystemPermitfortheaddressbelow. Target Buckland Road. South Windsor, CT. Sincer Mic a gnier Ge al Manager Cr Lic. #F30042• MA Lic. #001133 r STATEOV CO' CTICVT 9620/ 94 DEPARTMENT OF C NSUIfER PRLTECTION 165 TfR? CT96! O 163PIT L AUE . HAo U 1f` 1 y 1 ' l• Be it known that I co, 1 MICA iAELj r A NI. 4 208 TRUMBULL AVE i PLANVILLE060. 62 Is hereby certified by the Department of Consumer Protectiani as a licensed FIRE LTD CONT RAC o 9 i LIEN E NLi1vt ER: I? ATE: 11/ Ol/ 1999 T Ele I' IRATION DATE: 14/ 31/ 2000 dames Commissioner MA k-- SIC r . I t ,` ' y ' ' r, r' 1 : I I., i 1 1. 7' T 1. r_-' -!- n t i : ^, • • ri I if; n . ` ' ; t al nl/_' F , _ I 11ilA,, r a 1 i i 1. I" 1 ! ,"! 1. 1. 7- I I 1 i, 1 im CGDCDGDGDDCDCDGDCC CC C GD CIIIGCDCCDBD . rn R • ^ - - t 7` C) t11 APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT SIGN PERMIT W Approval: 125 Buckland Hills Drive Est. Cost: lo No. 27306 Permit Fee: S_ f2> Final Inspections: Approved: UCJ Building 0 tb vl Electric # Zoni Applicant Name te—cl Address "._ S--l 0<i Phone (?,'02?.,(r Location of Sign0'. Zone Sign Size (square feet Sign eight of signs on site: Free-standing Wall, TYPE of SIGN: Wall or Free-standing New or Replacement Illuminated? Yes No Description of sign materials and lighting: cc> le y ATTACH DIAGRAM OF SIGN INCLUDING DIMENSIONS have read, understand and agre to abide by the South Windsor Zoning Regulations, Signs. SIGNATURE Date S a,I 1f APPLICATION FOR PERMANE NT SIGN PERMITZoningApproval: 125 Buckland Hills Dr 've Ref. 4! 36 Est. Cost: $No. 275FinalInspections: Permit Fee: $ 3t-40tBuilding10( Jk Approved: Zoni Electric # Applicant Name Address Phone Location of Sign r S "(/ d ne/-'.Sign Size (square feet) Sign Heightg of signs on site: Free-standing WallTYPEofSIGN: all or[] Free-standing @No eW or Replacement Illuminated? es [] NoDescriptionofsignmaterialsandlighting: 4s 6 -O ATTACH DIAGRAM OF SIGN INCLUDINGIhaveread, understand and agree to abide y the South Windsor Zonin DIMENSIONS g Regulations, Signs SIGNATURE Date l e(J