Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Files_82693_pg0334 1 2: 1-291 WB Ramps & Route 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour * I -1 4\ I # W' O M Nam" z,:. a 1 6t `­_Wfi 'W SBR MAW Lane Configurations '� tt tt idea! Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1000 1.900 1900 Mr, A ' Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' Lane,Ud,. Factor 0.97 1.00 1,00 0.95 0.95 1,00 AR Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1100 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(Prot) 3213 1482 1736 3471 3505 1568 F1t:Rermitted" �0.95 1:00 0.95 1.00 -1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3213 1482 1736 3471 3505 1568 Volume(vph). 180 90 420 910 870 480 w as Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 Add F.,low(vph) , 217 1,08 _442 958 946 522 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 94 0 Q 0 0 Lane Group 22 flow(vph) 217 14 442 958, 946 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 4% 4% 3% 3% Turn,Type Perm Prot Free' Protected Phases 4 1 2 2 Permitted Phases 4 Free3T: Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 10.4 28.2 36.1 36.1 90.0 Effective Green, g(s) 11.8 1'1:8 28.2 38.0 38.0 90.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.42 0.42 1.00 Clearance. me s ' 5,4 , 5A 4.0 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 3.0 Lane,Grp Ca (vph 421" " 194 �544 1466 1480 1568 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.25 c0.28 0.27 v/s Ratio'Perm 0.01 0 33 ;` 64 � ..�"�_� v/c Ratio 0.52 0.07 0.81 0.65 0.64 0.33 Vq Uniform Delay,d1 36.4 34.3 28.5 20.7 " 206 0 0 . Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.25 0.99 1.00 Its Incrernental Delay, d2 0.4 0,1 �`7.2 1.9 1.7 04 Delay(s) 36.9 34A 27.8 27.8 22.0 0.4 Level of Service D C. JC Approach Delay(s) 36 0 27.8 14 4 Approach LQSjwjg x� .,j r, MW .w _ HCM"Average Corifro7 Delay 22 5 HCM Level of Serve = C iWIN HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 69 Actuated C cle Len th s 90 0 Sum,of,lost time.Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.8% ICU Level of Service C Arialysis Period (mini) 15 t.. c Critical Lane Group , J:\72189.10\tech\Traffic\synchro\2010 EX-PM.sy7 Synchro 6 Report VHB, Inc. i