Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application Files_82693_pg0321
' 4: 1-291 EB Ramps & Route 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 No-Build Weekday PM Peak Hour ' �, y EBL. E47T "" EBR � YYT # 'ttY{-7 NL7t3 '" 7s11- =ST, '� .47T Lane Configurations T+ tt r 1 , t�` r Ideal Flow(vph01) _ 1900 190T 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 =1900.' 1900 1000 ' Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4 0 4,0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util: Factor 0.97 1 M 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1'M 0.95 1.00 ._ _1.00, 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.,00 1.00 0.85 FltProtected 0.95 1 00 1.00 ' 0.95 . 1_00, 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 . Satd. Flow(prot) 3367 18-27 1553 1770 1718 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 FIt.Permitted 0.06 1.00 1 00 0 05 1.00 0.95 1`:00 1 00; 0.95 1:00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3367 1827 1553 1770 1718 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Volume'(vph) 1475 " 805 515 115 60 -;65 160 860, . 265,. 20 600 390 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,82 0.82 0 82 Adj. Flow(vph) 505 420 548. 144 75 81 1`72 925 285 24 732 476 ' RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 505 420 548 144,111"1 Q 0 172 925 116 24 732 476 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4%° 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%° 2% Turn Type Split, Free " Split Prot Perm Prot Free Protected Phases 4 4 7 7 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Free 6 °Free - Actuated Green, G (s) 20.9 20.9 90.0 11.6 11.6 11.6 34.7 34.7 2.8 25 9 90.0 Effective Green;g (s) 21.9 21.0 90:0 12:6 12.6 11.6 36.7 36 7 2:8,. 27.9 9Q(? Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 1.00 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.03 0.31 1.00 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5 0 5 0 5:0 4.0 6.0 "6 0 ` '4.0 6 0 y i Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph)- 819 445 1553 248 241° 228 ` 1443 "646 55 1097 1,583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0..23 c0.08 0.06 c0.10 c026 0.01 0.21 v/s_ Ratio Perm 0 35 0.07 0.3, � � v/c Ratio 0.62 0.94 0.35 0.58 0.46 0.75 0.64 0.18 0.44 0.67 0.30 Uniform Delay,d1 30,3` 334 Q 362 35.6, 37 8 21.4 " 17.0 42.8 27.0 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.64 1.00 Incremental Delay d2; 1,0 28,5 0.6 '2:2 Q;5 11.8 2.2 0.6 1 ��`2 6 0 4 ' Delay(s) 31.3 61.9 0.6 38.5 36.1 49.7 23 6 17 6 32.4 47.0 0.4 L',eveLof Service C E A� D D D C B C D A �.��- ,.__ . Approach Delay(s) 28.6 37.2 25.6 28.7 Approach LO D C C i { HCM Average Control,Delay 28.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 ActuatedCycle Lengfh;'(s}: 90,0 Sum of lost"fime Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis,Period(mm) `. 15 c Critical Lane Group J:\72189.10\tech\Traffic\synchro\2015 NB-PM.sy7 Synchro 6 Report VHB, Inc.