Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWell Correspondence 00 Clark Street (3) � re - y STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION April 14, 1997 Robert Deptula 3/ op Sanitarian Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Water Supply Order No. 4458 Modified Dear Bob: As we discussed in our meeting on April 9, 1997, the Town of South Windsor has not fulfilled its obligations under Water Supply Order No...,,4,458 Modified and Water Supply Order No. W,,C49 which require the provision of a permanent water supply to residents whose wells have bi2�n polluted with pesticides including EDB and dieldrin. I have enclosed a copy.of my letter dated September 18, 1996 that summarized our discussion of September 17, 1996 including identification of those items the Town was to complete. Per our discussion of April 9, 1997, many of these items have not been completed by the Town of South Windsor. This letter summarizes our discussions of April 9 including the tasks that the To«n of South Windsor must complete. It also identifies the tasks that are necessary to address the properties on Beelzebub Road. GAC Filter System Installations: The Town of South Windsor is eligible to receive funding under the grant agreement dated November 9. 1987 for the installation of GAC filter systems and 5 years costs for maintenance and monitoring of the GAC filters at the following properties where public water is not available: . . ` 437 CIark Street 339 Oakland Street 440 Deming Road 359 Oakland Street As 17eneral information I have enclosed a cone of the Department's Fact Sheet on GAC filter systems and the specifications for &k` filter installations. Please note that the specifications for installation have been modified to be specific for removal ofEDB. It should also be noted*that-althou`h required in the specifications. a filter system installed Without the pressure gauges will be acceptable for removal of EDB. (Printed on Rec:•cied Paper) An Equal Opportunity Emplawer a For any property that is installing a GAC filter system, the Town must notify the property owner regarding the procedure to follow to install a GAC filter system. As noted in my September 18. 1996 letter, the Town should collect water samples from the homes that are to install GAC filters for analysis for bacteria and general physical/chemical parameters including iron and manganese to determine if chlorination or pretreatment is required. The Town must also provide the homeowner with guidance on the maintenance that the homeowner should take (replacement of sediment filters and replacement of carbon). Based on testing that has been done by the DEP, carbon filter maintenance (moving the backup carbon canister into the primary canister location and installing fresh carbon into the backup location) should be completed once every two years. As we discussed, the cost for filter maintenance for the first five years after installation is a grant eligible cost. The Town,.however, must submit a cost estimate (including justification) for the 5 years maintenance/monitoring costs for DEP approval and to ensure that appropriate funds will be available. Additionally,the costs for annual monitoring of the raw and treated water for the first five years after installation is a grant eligible cost. The Town must submit, for DEP approval, an estimate of what these costs will be or reimbursement will not be available. Again, as stated in my September 18 letter, for any property that previously installed a GAC filter system, the Town must provide the homeowner with information on the recommended maintenance schedule and should determine, and notify the DEP, whether or not any - maintenance has been performed. If sediment filters and/or carbon changes have not been completed, then the Town should submit a proposal (including.costs estimates) to complete such work for a five year period to the DEP for approval. Please note that the Town must notify the DEP in writing once a GAC filter system has been installed. This will allow me to update my data table and as necessary, discontinue bottled water deliveries. Public Water Connections: The Town of South Windsor is eligible to receive funding under the grant agreement dated November 9. 1987 for the connection to public water and the abandonment of water supply wells at the following properties: 1Z,D1-0( �� ® e 480 Clark: Street 250 Smith Street 1� +� �P n 489 Clark Street 274 Smith Street —,/t/t CA l e e S L-�►3 c 321 Deming Road 291 Smith Street `1.ocK-o�(' &Ow 6Y 7�2 �5 29 Ridge Road for ge�-i� As stated in my September 18 letter, these residents must be notified of the ,procedure to be followed to connect to public water and abandon their water supply wells. Funding for the connections %v ll be avaiiaole orny :r the ,%eels are a-bandoned. As previously diSCUSsed, there 3 7 may be specific situations in which the DEP will allow a polluted well to remain. If anv Z homeowner indicates that they would consider connecting to public water onlv if they could continue to use their well for watering extensive lawns, etc., they should contact me directly or submit a letter to me outlining why they want to continue using their polluted well. Please note that if the DEP approves continued use of a well, the homeowner will incur certain expenses for backflow preventors, cross connection surveys, and treatment of the po-lluted water. For any homeowner that intends to connect to public water, the Town.must submit 3 cost estimates for the connection and well abandonment to the DEP for approval. This will ensure that funds are available for reimbursement. The following summarizes our discussions regarding specific addresses: 175 Clark Street/1075 Pleasant Valley Road These two properties share a well. A GAC filter was installed in October 1990. Per prior correspondence you were to arrange for sampling of the raw and treated water. Based on our recent conversation, this testing has not yet been completed. It was agreed that you would complete this testing within 1-2 weeks. (Please note the property owner should be notified regarding appropriate maintenance requirements). 361 Clark Street: The DEP is scheduled to resample this residence in July, 1997. Per my letter of September 18. you were to send the results of the July 1996 testing to the resident. Based on our most recent discussions. a letter was sent to the homeowner and you will forward me a copy. 437 Clark Street: The Town is eligible to receive funding for a GAC filter system for this property. Based on our recent discussions, you will arrange for bacteria and general chemical.1physical parameter sampling and submit cost estimates for the GAC filter installation and maintenance. 479 Clark Street: --- `110 04. u-f Per my letter of September 18, you were to sampie to ev-aluate current levels of.EDB in the water. suonlN: well at this residence. If the concentration of EDB exceeds the action_ level. the Trnvr, will be e!:gioie to rec:ei,.e funding for pubic water 6f a\ai:abae) ur a GAL niter. I*o gate nis resting, has not been completed. In our April 9 meeting you indicated the sampling will be conducted. 4 480 Clark Street: The Town is eligible to receive funding for connection to public water and abandonment of the water supple well for this property. Per my letter of September 18 and our September discussions. you were to send the results of the July 1996 testing to the resident and notifi them of the procedure to follow to connect to public water. Based on our recent discussions, you will send the appropriate notification. 489 Clark Street: The Town is eligible to receive funding for connection to public water and abandonment of the water supply well for this property. Per my letter of September 18, you were to notify the resident of the procedure to follow to connect to public water including notification regarding discontinuance of bottled water deliveries. (See attached 9/18/96 letter). -315 and 373 Deming Street These two properties are scheduled to be sampled by the DEP this month. 324 Deming Street: The Town is eligible to receive funding for connection to public water and abandonment of the water supply well for this property(the concentrations of both EDB and TCP are above the action levels). Per my letter of September 18 and our September discussions, you were to notify the resident of the procedure to follow to connect to public water. Based on our recent discussions. you will send the appropriate notification. i 350 Deming Street: This residence installed a GAC filter system in order to receive a Certificate of Occupancy from the Town. It was agreed that you would collect water samples from the raw, 1st treated and 2nd treated taps to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment system. Additionally, information regarding maintenance requirements must be forwarded to the homeowner. Funding for maintenance may be available as noted above. 440 Deming Street: This residence is currently receivin_ bottled water from the DEP due :o FDB above he acro-i iev ei. The Town is eligible to receive funding for a GAC filter system for this property. The Weil water.must be tested for bacteria and general chemical/physical parameters to evaluate the need for pretreatment. notification regarding procedure for installation must be sent to the homeowner. and cost estimates for the GAC filter installation and maintenance sunmitted to the DEP You 5 indicated in our discussion that the water main may be extended past this property in the future. Unless this extension is imminent, the property owner must be notified of the procedure regarding GAC installation. If public water comes in at a later date, the resident will then have the option of connecting on their own. 443 Deming: You confirmed that this property is still vacant and likely to be demolished in the future. 395 Ellington Road: A GAC filter system was installed at this property in 1990. Per prior correspondence you were to arrange for sampling of the raw and treated water. Based on our recent conversation, this testing has not yet been completed. It was agreed that you would complete this testing within 1-2 weeks_ and also determine if maintenance has been completed in the past. Please note the property owner should be notified regarding appropriate maintenance requirements. 430 Ellington Road: The DEP is scheduled to resample this residence in July, 1997. Per my letter of September 18. you were to send the results of the July 1996 testing to the resident. Based on our most recent discussions,a letter may have been sent to the homeowner. If a letter was sent, a copy must be forwarded to me. If not, the results must be sent to the homeowner(with a copy to me). 56 Felt Road: Per my letter September 1996 letter, you were to sample this residence to evaluate current EDB concentrations. This testing must be completed. 339 Oakland Road: The Town is eligible to receive funding for a GAC filter system for this property, which is currently receiving bottled water. Per my letter of September 1996, you were to send notification regarding filter instal lation/maintenance. The well water at this home must be tested for bacteria and general chemical/physical parameters to evaluate the need for pretreatment. notification regarding the procedure for filter installation must be sent to the homeo-L-neY, and cost estimates for the GAC tlter installation and maintenance submitted to the DEP for approval prior to installation. This property installed a GAC filter system in 1992. Per prior correspondence, you were to gran>e `;r sampling of the ra,,t- and treated ,xater. Based on our r:ce^t con--.ersation. this.test 6 has not yet been completed. It was agreed that you would complete this testing within 1-2 weeks and also determine if maintenance has been completed in the past. Please note the propert-, owner should be notified regarding appropriate maintenance requirements and available funding, 359 Oakland Road: The Town is eligible to receive funding for a GAC filter system for this property. Per my letter of September 1996, you were to send notification regarding filter installation/maintenance. The well water at this home must be tested for bacteria and general chemical/physical parameters to evaluate the need for pretreatment,'notification regarding the procedure for filter installation must be sent to the homeowner, and cost estimates for the GAC filter installation and maintenance submitted to the DEP for approval prior to installation. 29 Ridge Road: This property has EDB at levels that exceed the action level. Per my letter dated September 18. 1996 the Town is eligible to receive funding for this property to connect to public water and abandon their well. However, my records indicate that the homeowner installed a GAC filter system at this property. It was previously agreed that you would notify the homeowner regarding their eligibility for the public water connection,the discontinuance of bottled water, and if they chose to keep their GAC filter, provide guidance on maintenance requirements. These items must be addressed. It is recommended that samples be collected to confirm the GAC filter is working effectively. 236 and 307 Smith Street: These two properties are scheduled to be sampled by the DEP this month. 250 Sm:th Strut: This property was not discussed in our September 1996 meeting. The residents are currently receiving bottled water due to elevated concentrations of TCP. Due to the historical presence of EDB at concentrations exceeding the action level, the Town is eligible to receive funding for connection to public water and abandonment of the water supply well for this property. The homeowner must be notified of the appropriate procedure to follow and cost estimates submitted for approval prior to the initiation of the work. 2174 Smith Street. i'�- -i.. ... __.�� :;�t�r.:� : . •:,. . �,:. S, I a L­:er ate 1 to p:,:,:e:L. notifying them that they should connect to public water and abandon their well. The Town must follow-up with the property owner to obtain written notification as to whether or not they will connect. P!..--se note -hat th-- concen:rdtion of TCP in the water supply xell at this property 111'so 7 exceeds the action level. 291 Smith Street: Per my letter dated September 18, 1996, you sent a letter dated October 9, 1996 to this property notifying them that they should connect to public water and abandon their well. The Town must follow-up with the property owner to obtain written notification as to whether or not they will connect. / �/ Beelzebub Road Properties: The Town of South Windsor is eligible to receive funding under the grant agreement for the. connection to public water and the abandonment of water supply wells at the following properties: 65 Beelzebub Road 121 Beelzebub Road 80 Beelzebub Road 122 Beelzebub Road 81 Beelzebub Road 136 Beelzebub Road 90 Beelzebub Road 146 Beelzebub Road 102 Beelzebub Road 152 Beelzebub Road 105 Beelzebub Road 161 Beelzebub Road The same general guidelines listed Above must be followed to notify these residents of the procedure to connect to public water and abandon their water supply wells. As noted above, fUriding for the connections will be available only if the wells are abandoned. The Town is requested to complete all sampling identified in this letter by April 30, 1997. Additionally..please send me copies of any'cotrespondence sent to the properties identified in this letter. As we discussed, the Town of South Windsor must follow-up with those residents who have not responded to prior notification from the Town regarding connection to public water or installation of GAC filter systems. A summary letter outlining the items that have been completed and a schedule for completing the remaining items must be submitted to me by May 9, 1997. w O \ If you have any questions, please contact me at (860) 424-3771. Sincerely, Naomi Davidson Supervising Environmental Analyst Permitting, Enforcement& Remediation Division c: Hilda Dodge Matthew Galligan, Town Manager Sent Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 01/30/04 10:06 FAX 1@ 001 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, PROTECTION January 29, 2004, Rudolph Masciovecchlo Residence 359 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Masciovecchio. Enclosed is a Copy of the laboratory analysis for the unfiltered (raw)water sample collected from 359 Oakland rsence dibrom de (EDB), 1d,2,3-trichlo p p ne on 1/9/2004. The a(TCP)ater nd le 2 d b omoo--d3-chloro for the proe a e ( of ethylene p p DBCP). Results from the analyses are summarized in Table 1 (attached). Table 1 also includes each compound's respective action level set by the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH)_Please note that only established action levels are included in Table 1. If an action level has not been listed it means that an action level has not been established for that particular compound and its detection does not render the water unsafe for drinking or other domestic uses. Refering to Table 1, the water sample collected from your unfiltered water supply contained detectable concentrations of pollutants at concentrations at or above their respective action level_ An action level is the concentration at or above which the DPH has determined there could be a risk to the health of persons consuming the water. Consequently, your unfiltered water is not considered to be potable. According to the analytical results for water samples collected from after your GAC filter system (final treated), your filtered water is potable with respect to those parameters analyzed and is Suitable for drinking and other domestic uses_ Copies of the analytical results for the post filter water samples are also attached for your records. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at(860)424-3796. Sincerely, Post it Fax Note 7671 Date i_ M34 To l MaryAnne Danyluk Co. AIWILIL Environmental Analyst 2 comept rWaste Management Bureau Phone 0 Phone#Remediation Division Fax# 7 Fax# Enclosures (Printed on Recycled Paper 79 Elm Strect • Hertford, CT 06106-5127 http://dcP,state,ct.us An Equal Opportunity Employer 01430/04 10:06 FAX Q02 TABLE ONE Raw Water Sample Results 359 Oakland Road South Windsor,Connecticut CONY TGUND ANALYZED CONCENTRATION DEFECTED uz/1 ACTYON LEVEL us/1 1,2 dibronioethane(EDB 0.04 0 1,2,3-trichloropropane(TCP) ND 0.05 1,2 dibromo-3-chloropropane(DBCp) ND NAL 140tes: ug/l Microgram per liter ND Not detected above analytical detection limits NAY, An action level bas not been established by the Departznent of Public Health(DPH) 01/•30/04 10:07 FAX 0003 STATE OF CONNECTICCJT ACCESSION NO. Department of Public Hcdth Division of Laboraory Services qR:3593 11SO19460 S 66074 t} 1 10 Clinton SL,P.O.Box 1689 INFORMATION Hartford,Cr 06144 13?SQUTH W I NDSOR CONN.CLINICAL TIrMG LICENSE#CL-0197 RLIDOLPHE MAST;I OVECCH TELEPHONE:(860)509-8500 Z59 OAKLAND RD SOUTH W I NDSOR CT 06074 ROBERT DEPTULA, SANITARIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AVE • •' TOWN HALL. 01/09/0 01/09/04 4 01/16/0 L SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 15y3? 13 04 FINAL REPORT ' SAMPLING POINTS BEFORE FILTER COLLECTOR: DANYL tK, MARYAN TITLE; EAZ PRIVATE WEI..L TREATMENT s ATE ANALYZED 01/13/04 ---------------------------------------------------------- EPA METHOD 504. 1 MEASUREMENT OF 1,2--DIBROMOETHANE CEDE? ► 1 ,Z-DIBRDMO- 3--CHL-OROPROPANE (DBCP) AND ir2,3 TRICHLOROPROPANE ( 123TCP) IN DRINKING WATER BY MICROEXTRACTIQN AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. „_-------------_--------------_--- ------------------------ PA 504. 1 COMPOUND RESULT MDL POL 1 ,2-D I BROMOETHANE 0.04 0.004 0.0Z 1 ,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND 0.002 0.02 172,3-TRICHLOROPRQPANF NO 0.003 0.04 All Valises OXPressd in ug/1 (PPb) ND - None Detected ( less then the PQL) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit POL - Practical Quantitation Limit ( lowest standard) MDL calculated based on a Signal/Naive Ratio of 5: 1 according to CFR Part 136 Appendix B REMEDIATION SECTION,2ND FL RECEIVED JAN 2 S 2004 iwj WASTE MANAGEMENT BUREAU ----- END Or REPORT RM NO.OL-GA REV.01-02 01/30/04 10:07 FAX 0 004 STATE OF CONNECTICut WIYR Dcpartment of Public Hcallh Division of Laboratory Scrvices NR:359M7461 5Q607 10 Clinwn St.,P.O.Box 1699 Hartford, N LICC614 UTH W I NDSOR CONK.CLINICAL,TES7'1NG LICENSE#CL4197 TELEPHONE:(860)509.5500 RUDOLPHE MASCIOVECCH --� 359 OAKLAND RD SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ROBERT DEPTULA, SANITAIRIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AVE SOUTH HALL O 1/09/0 01/09/04 01/16/04 H wltyDSDR CT ObO�4 09:14 15a 3g 13:04 JFINAL REPORT SAMPLING POINT: MIDDLE FILTER COLLECTOR: DANYLUK, MARYAN TITLE: EA 2 PRIVATE WELL TREATMENT: )ATE ANALYZED 01/13/04 - EPA METHOD 504.1 _----��_ MEASUREMENT OF I '2-DIBROMOETHANE IEDB} y 1.2-DiBROMO-- 3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) AND 1,2,3 TRICHLQROPROPANE ( 123TCP) IN DRINKING WATER BY MaCROEXTRACTION ARID GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. ------------------------------------ _ 'PA 504. 1 COMPOUND RESULT ------------------ 'PA _—`_ 1 ,2-DIBROMOETHANE ND 0.004 0.0:2 IP2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND 0.002 0.02 1 .2 r 3-TRICHL-OROPROPANE ND 0.005 0.04 All values expnessd in US/1 tppb: ND None Detected ( 1059 t!-ten the PQL) MDL -- Minimum Detection Limit PQL - Praoticat ©uantitation Limit ( 'lowest, standard) MDL Calculated based on a SXBnat/Noise Ratio of 3;1 according to CFR Part 136- Appendix B REMEDIATION SECTION,2ND FL RECEIVED JAN 2 8 Z004 WASTI=MANAGEMENT BUREAU END OF REPORT W NO.OL-6A REV.01-02 01✓30/04 10:07 FAX IM 005 STATE OF CONNECUCUT -ACCES5ioNr�o., 1ACCOLUINTNO. Department or Public Health Division of Laboratory Services NR 1359A 18019462 S06074 O 1 10 Clinton SL,P.O.Box 1689 Hanford,CT 06144 f 32SQUTH W I MDSCIR , CON".CLINICAL TESTING LICENSE#CL.-0197 RClDOLPH^c I"iASCIOVEGCH TELEPIrONE:(860)509-8500 F —I 359 OAKLAND RD SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ROBERT DEPTULAr SANITARIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AVE COLLECTED RECEIVED REPORTEu TOWN HALL 01/0g/0 01/09/04 01/16/04 L SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 J 09a14 15;39 13:06 FINAL REPORT 16 JI&M - 0 SAMPLING POINT= AFTER FILTER COLLECTOR: DANYLUK r MARYAN T I Ti_E= EA 2 PRIMATE WELL TREATMENTS . EJE )ATE ANALYZED EPA METHOD 504. 1 ---------- MEASUREMENT OF 1 .2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDR) , 1r2-DIBRQMO-- 3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) AND -IrZ,3 TRICHLOROPRQPANE ( 123TCP) IN DRINKING WATER IIY M I CROEY,TRACT ION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. _ r ^_^T__-y ---------------- -----' __ :PA 5C�4. ;. COMPOUND RESULT MDL RQL 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE ND 0.004 0.02 I .2-DrSROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND 0.002 0.02 1 r 2 r 3-TR I CHLOROPRQ PANE ND 0.005 0.04 A 1 l values oxpr essd in US/1 (ppb) ND - None Detected ( less them the POL) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit PUL - Practical QuantiCation Limit ( lowest Standard) MDL calculated based on a Signal/Noise Ratio of 5s1 according t6 CFR part 136 Appendix B REMEDIAMON SECTION,2ND FL RECEIVED JAN 2 S 2004 0& WASTE MANAGEMENT BUREAU --------- �EaE END OF REPORT RM NO.OL-9A REV.01.02 01/3Q/04 10:07 FAX IM006 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION w January 5, 2004 Niel Lanier Residence 339 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. or Ms. Lanier_ Enclosed is a copy of the laboratory analysis for the unfiltered (raw)water sample collected from 339 Oakland Road on 12/17/2003. The water sample was analyzed for the presence of ethylene dibromide (EDB), 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP), and 1,2 dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP). Results from the analyses are summarized in Table 1 (attached)_ Table 1 also includes each compound's respective action level set by the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH). Please note that only established action levels are included in Table 1. If an action level has not been listed it means that an action level has not been established for that particular compound and its detection does not render the water unsafe for drinking or other domestic uses. Refering to Table 1, the sample collected from your unfiltered water supply did not contain compounds at concentrations above any established action level. An action level is the concentration at or above which the DPH has determined there could be a risk to the health of persons consuming the water. Consequently, your water is potable with respect to those parameters analyzed and is suitable for drinking and other domestic uses_ According to the analytical results for water samples collected from after your GAC filter system (final treated), your filtered water is potable with respect to those parameters analyzed and is suitable for drinking and other domestic uses. However,the filters need to be changed. The DEePscontractor. Aqua Pump will be contacting you to make arrangements to change out of the Copies of the analytical results for the post filter water samples are also attached for your records. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at(860)424-3796. Sincerely, MaryAnne Danyluk Environmental Analyst 2 Waste Management Bureau Remediation Division Enclosure (Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street a Hartford, CT 06106.5127 Lttp:Udep.atate.tt.na An Equal Opponunity Employer 01/39/04 10:08 FAX. 1@ 007 TABLE ONE Raw Water Sample Results 339 Oakland Road South Windsor,Connecticut COMPOUND ANALYZFA CONCENTRATION DETECTED ap/1 ,ACTION LEVEL u pfi 1,2 dibromoethane(EDB) 0.1 0.05 1,2,3-trichloropropane(TCF) ND 0.05 1,2 dibromo-3-chloropropane(DBCp) ND NAL Notes- ug/1 Microgram per liter ND Not detected above analytical detection limits NAL An action level has not been established by the DepaMnent of public Health(DpH) 01/3Q/04 10:08 FAX 1@ 008 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DePartmcnt of public Health Division of Laboratory Servicos =339.1318019400 S06074 0 10 Clinton.St..P.O.Box 1689 Iiartford,CT 06144 ' CONN.CLINICAL TESTING LICENSE#CL-0197 132SOUTH WINDSOR TELEPHONE:(860)5094500 MIEL LANIER F —� 339 OAKL.AND SOUTH WINDSOR CT `.)6074 ROBERT DLPTULA, SANITARIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AVE1818 TOWN HALL 12/17/0 12/17/077 L SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 J 10:45, 11:53 FINAL REPORT AN& SAMPLING POINT: BEFORE FILTER COLLECTOR: DANLYUK, M TITLE: EA2 PRIVATE WELL TREATMENT: , DATE ANALYZED 12/17/03 lwP,�! METHOD 504.1 '---�-__ ---^-- MEASUREMENT OF 1 ,2-DIBROMOETHAME (EDB) , 1 ,2-DIBR0MO- 3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) AND 1 ,2,3 TRICHLOROPROPANE (123TCP) IN DRINKING WATER BY M I CROEXTRACT I ON AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. ---------------------------------------------- EPA 504.1 COMPOUND RESULT MDL -POL- -- 1 ,2-DIBROMOETHANE 0. 1 0.004 0.02 i ,2-DIBROMO-3-GHLOROPROPANE ND Q.Q02 0,42 1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 0.005 0.04 All values wXpr&ssd in U9/1 (ppb) ND - None Detected (less than the PQL) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit PQL - PracticAl Qusntitation Limit (10west standard) MDL calculated based on a SISnal/NaiSe Ratio of 5: 1 according to CFR Part 136 Appendix a REMEDIATION SECTION,2ND FL RECEIVED DEC 2 4 2003 WASH MANAGEMENT BUREAU -- * END OF REPORT RM NO.OL-SA REV.01.02 01/39/04 10:08 FAX 1@009 STATE OF CONNECTICUT ACCESSION NO, ACCOUNT No, Dcp&tnmt of Public Hcalth Division of Laboratory Scrvicas Nit:339M !8 01 5p•b- ESS 07410 Clinton St.,P,O,Box 1699 4N f Harford,CT 06144 3ZBUCONN.CLINICAL TESTING LICENSr#CL-0197 1QTH WINDSOR TELEPHONE:(860)509-8500 NIEL LANIER 339 0ACL SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ROBERT DEPTULA, SANITARIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AVE • . •.-INDI. TOWN HALL !2l17ft� 12l17/`0L2/22lp3 SOUTH WINDSDR CT 08074 12/170;45 11 :.172/12 "FINALPORT SAMPLING POINT: MIDDLE FILTER COLLECTOR: DANYLUK, M TITLE: EA2 PRIVATE WELL TREATMENT, DATE ANALYZED 12/17/03 ----- --------------------------- ------ ' EPA METHOD MEASUREMENT OF 1 ,2-DIRROMOETHANE (EDB) , 1 ,2-DISRO_OMp-_---_ 5 3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) AND 1,2,3 TRICHLOROPROPANE Ci23TCP) IN DRINKING WATER BY MICROEXTRACTION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. =PA 504. 1 COMPOUND--------------------------------------------------- RESULT MDL POL 1 ,2-DIBROMOETHANE 0.09 0.004 0.02 172--DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND U.002 0.0z 1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE NO 0.005 0.04 All VR1ues exPressd in ugll (Ppb) NO - Noma Detectad ( LOSS then the FOL) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit POL -- practical Guantitetion Limit (lawest standard) MDL calculated based on a Signul/Noise Ratio of 5:1 according to CFR Part 136 APpendi.c B MEDIA77ON SECTION,2ND FL �'1vU 4wM"--p- RECEIVED DEC 2 4 2003 Vy TE MANAGEMENT BUREAU - _ - END OF REPORT N NO.OL-6A REV.01-02 91/3U/04 10:08 FAX 0 010 STATE OF CONNECTICUT Deparfincni of Public Health • ' Division of Laboratory Services NR*339A i�a1948z 10 Clinton St,P.O.Box 1689 IS06074 p 1 iartford,CT 06144 I .- 0011N•CLINICAL TESTING LICENSE#CL-0197 132SOUTH WINDSOR TELEPHONE:(860)509-8500 N I EL LAN I ER F 334 OAKLAND SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ROBERT DEPTULA, SANITARIAN 1540 SULLIVAN AYE 71-- - TOWN HALL SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 12f171017/0 12f2-/0- 10:�45 33 0B:07 -------------- FINAL REPORT • SAMPLING POINT: AFTER FILTER 001-LECTDR: DANYLUK, M TITLE: EA2 PRIVATE WELL TREATMENT: DATE ANALYZED 12/17/03 ^.. _ MEASUREMENT OF 1 ----------- -__--- EPA METHOD 504. 1 3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) AND E1H2N3 TRDCHL.OROPROPANEMO- ( 123TCP) IN DRINKING WATER By MICROEYTRACTION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION. .PA 504. 1 COMPOUND--------------------------------------------------- RESULT---------------------,T_- RESULT MDL POL 112-DISROMOETHANE ND 01404 0.02 1 .2-'DI BROMO-3-CHLOROPR0PANE ND 01.002 d.42 1 ,2,3-TRICHL.OROPROPANE ND 0.005 0.04 All values WKPressd in ug/t (Ppb) ND - None Detected ( less then the POL) MDL - Minimum Detection Limit PQL- - PPactical Quantitation Limit (10west standar-d) MDL calculated based on a Signal/Noise Ratio of Mji acearding to CFR Pant 136 APPendix B RE ED1A�7ON SEC REC,e/ N,2ND FL DEC E 4 2003 was MA*GS1WE Nr,8uR,u END OF REPORT N NO,OL-W%REV.01-02