HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc Correspondence 374 Abbe Road Extens /t0.pN a 4
O p.
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 \
�f~�SOR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
JEAN E.ZURBRIGEN
Town Manager April 25, 1991
Mr. Kirby Holcombe
374 Abbe Road Extension
South Windsor, Connecticut
Dear Mr. Holcombe:
In response to your letter of April 23, 1991, please be
assured that I have investigated your complaints regarding
your plan for your serkrer connection; and trust that any
misunderstanding regarding the sufficiency of your plans has
been resolved.
Mr. Shaw, Asst. Director of Public Works, informed me that
no engineering plans were submitted to the Water Pollution
Control Authority--but rather, a previously drawn plan with
a line indicating the approximate location of your proposed
sewer connection. You are indeed correct that the issue
regarding your failing septic system has been protracted;
however, it was always the Town's intent to work with you
and your neighbors for a solution that was agreeable rather
than punitive.
Mr. Shaw has assured me that, with the submission of
appropriate plans provided by your Engineer and accepted by
the WPCA, your sewer installation can move forward as
expeditiously as possible.
If. there are any further questions regarding the Town' s
position relative to appropriately engineered sewer
installations, please do not hesitate to call my office.
very truly yours,
Manager
JEZ:prb
cc: C. F. Shaw, Asst. Dr. of Public Works
R. Deptula, Environ. Health Officer -
May 29, 1991
MUURANDUK
TO: George Spring, Jr, , Director of Finance
RE: Sanitary Sewer System Bond -
374 Abby Road Extension, South Windsor
Bank book in amount of $101000. 00
The subject property has recently been connected to public sewers,
and the Savings Bank of Rockville bank book should therefore be
returned to Mr. J. Kirby Holcombe, 374 Abby Road Extension, South
Winddor.
Robert De tula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
RD:jh
I
i
r
LAW OFFICES
KUEHN, CAVANAUGH AND CUMMINGS, P. C.
166S ELLINGTON ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN, 06074
(203) 644-3473
EDWARD R. KUEHN Xa�rc+ xax ,
HAROLD R . CUMMINGS WEST HARTFORD OFFICE:
FRAZIER G. SCOTT
968 FARMINGTON AVENUE
xX:are�xixx�xrc��araxx
RONA C. LYNCH - WEST HARTFORD, CONN. 06107
MICHAEL J. LANZA - -
(203) 236-2973
PLEASE REPLY TO:SOUTH WINDSOR
February 26, 1988
Mr. Robert Deptula
Town Sanitarian
Town of South Windsor
South Windsor Town Hall
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Cr 06074
In re: Sanitary Sewer System Bond-
Property of J. Kirby Holcombe and Elaine K. Holcombe
374 Abbe Road Extension, South Windsor
Dear Mr. Deptula:
Enclosed please find a bank book in the amount of $10,000.00. Our understanding is
that this bond of $10,000.00 is being delivered to the Town of South Windsor to ensure
the installation of a subsurface sanitary sewerageS&Lposal system on the property we
own at 374 Abbe Road Extension, South Windsor by 30, 1988. This bond will be
held by the Town of South Windsor and will only be released upon the occurence of either
of the following events:
A. Approval by the South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authortiy for the
connection of the above property to the South Windsor Sanitary Sewer system and the
completion of such connection to the South Windsor Sanitary Sewer system in accordance
with the regulations of the South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority; or
B. in the event that connection of the property to the South Windsor Sanitary
Sewer system is not approved by the South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,
then, in that event, installation of a subsurface sanitary sewer system on the property,
in accordance with the public health regulations of the State of Connecticut.
Upon connection to the Town sewer system, or installation of a sanitary sewer system
on the property, as provided above, then this bond shall be released and returned to us.
Our understanding is that this bond is being delivered to the Town in consideration
of your authorization of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy with regards to the
property.
Sfg-
In the event that we do not perform our obligations by ALuee 30, 1988 then the Town
of South Windsor, at its option may declare us in default: Ile
In the event we are in default we agree that the Town of South Windsor has the right to
enter onto our property and perform all the necessary work to complete the septic or
KUEHN, CAVANAUGH AND CUMMINGS, P.C.
sewer system. In that event we are liable for all costs incurred by the Town of
South Windsor, even if such costs exceed the amount of the bond.
Sincerely yours,
J. irbyv olcombe
e- el
Elaine K. Holcombe
SOURCE TELEPHONE(Home)
Ck—CBT TELEPHONE(Business) TIiIE
644-1189 SAVINGS BANK OF ROCKVILLE 05-7XCC�3dER
DATE OPENED
3-7-88 RATE
MAT.DATE 25 Park Street Rockville, CT 06066
5.50%
EMPLOYER ----- (MAIN OFFICE)
OCCUPATION INITIAL DEPOSIT BY I:.,..:. BRANCH OFFICES
Town of S.W. Town Mng 10 000
•00 MF I ROCKVILLE VERNON SOMERS
i, .. 1*afayette Square (203) 871-0717 Pitkin Road and Route 83 Playhouse Plaza
SINGLE NOW ACCT. 17 Park Street (203) 871-1858 (203) 871.0200 (203) 749.2231
JOINT REG.SAVINGS IMMA/IMMNOW SOUTH WINDSOR ENFIELD ELLINGTON
PERSONAL CKG. C.D.ACCT. MINOR 869 Sullivan Avenue *74 Palomba Drive Ellington Commons
IRA BUSINESS CK. TRUST—ADULT i' (203)644-4758 (203) 745-3771
CLUB ACCT. (203) 871.1858
ORGANIZATION DATE EXP. i *Lending Office Connecting All Offices (203) 871.1858
IDENTIFICATION IN Town of South Windsor for the
ADDRESS CHANGE ACCOUNT
WITH Benefit of J. Ke'rby and Elaine K.
Holcombe
I(we)agree to the terms and conditions of The Savings Bank of Rockville Deposit Account
Agreement and acknowledge receipt of same.
This account is not transferable except on the books of The Savings Bank of Rockville.
Please refer to your copy of the Deposit Contract for currently applicable rules and regulations
ACCOUNT TITLE Town of south Windsor for ACCOUNT NO. MEMBER FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
`rb & E i , 05-00-0000833
SIGNATURE Holcombe
DATE OF BIRTH Take advantage of the wide variety of services offered by THE SAVINGS BANK
SIGNATURE OF ROCKVILLE - the BEST COMMUNITY BANK IN CONNECTICUT!
2.
DATE OF BIRTH SAVINGS LOANS
SIGNATURE • Regular Savings Accounts • Home Mortgages
DATE OF BIRTH • Winner Check Club • Home Improvement
3 • Insured Money Market Accounts • Home Equity+Home Equity line of credit
ADDRESS(STREET) • Insured Money Market NOW Accounts • Personal
CITY-TOWN STATE • Certificate of Deposit (Your Choice Of Term •ZIP ) Auto/Recreational Vehicles
• Individual Retirement Accounts • Collateral - Stock and Passbook
LAST NAME
Sart FIRST MI S.S.NO. • Commercial Mortgages
•or Richard INVESTMENTS • Preauthorized Payment on all SBR Loans
LAST NAME Brokerage Services
FIRST M' S.S. Purchase and Redemption of U.S. Treasury BANKING CONVENIENCES
2 Holcombe J. Kirby .S.NO. Securities • Savings Bank Life Insurance (SBLI)
LAST NAME
044-32-7085 • U.S. Savings Bonds • Night Deposit
3.
FIRST • Notary Public and Signature Guarantee
MI S.S.NO. • Saturday Banking
s • Direct Deposit
Member F.D.I.C. EQ xo Ixe • Money Orders/Travelers Checks
OVER FOR SOCIAL SECURITY NO.CERTIFICATION. ND R • SNET and CLP Payment Agency
• Drive-In Banking
• SBR/24 - 24 Hour Banking
I t ay r / et 's and our very competitive rates.
Prep d f r you y: THANK YOU
PLEASE VERIFY ENTRY BEFORE LEAVING
"-nn-nnnnRaz '
DATE WITHDRAWAL
DIVIDEND DEPOSIT
BALANCE
NOTIFY BANK OF ANY
CHANGE OF ADDRESS
DATE WITHDRAWAL
DIVIDEND DEPOSIT
BALANCE
SAVINGS BANK OF ROChiMLE
THANK YOU
ORGANIZATIONS
(Clubs, Corporations)
To: The Savings Bank of Rockville, Rockville, Ct.
I, Secretary of , do hereby certify that the
following is a true copy of certain resolutions duly adopted at a meeting
of the of this organization.
Resolved:
1) that the Deposit Account Contract between the Organization and the Bank
is hereby authorized •and approved.
2) that each officer and agent of this Organization be and hereby is
authorized to deposit funds of this Organization with the Bank, which is
hereby designated as a depository of this Organization, and to withdraw
the same upon orders for payment drawn against any account with the Bank
in the name of this Organization, and made or signed by any of the
following persons:
Name Title Specimen Signature
3) that the foregoing resolution shall remain in full force and effect until
the Bank receives written notice of the modification or repeal thereof.
I further certify that none of the foregoing resolutions has been modified
or repealed and that each of them is in full force and effect as of this
date.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name (and if the Organ-
ization is a corporation, I have hereunto affixed its seal) this
day of 19
Secretary President
(Pre.sident must sign additionally only if the Secretary is one of the
persons authorized above).
TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
MEMORANDUM February 9, 1988
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works and
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 374 Abby Road
The above-referenced property has recently been renovated and
increased in size. There is no record available as to the type and
size of septic system which serves the dwelling.
A septic tank cleaner has indicated that the septic tank is of metal
construction, and is apparently still functioning properly. However,
since use of metal septic tanks was discontinued long ago, this tank
cannot be expected to be functional for much longer, nor can the
leaching area associated with it, if they were both installed at the
same time. The system currently is not failing.
At the request of the propertyowner, I observed a series of deep
observation pits on the property to determine the feasibility of
installing a new septic system. The majority of these pits con-
tained ledge close enough to existing grade to preclude a normal
septic system installation. The system, if installed in this area,
would have to be a filled and most likely pumped system.
Several test pits had ledge -deep enough to allow a non-filled or
pumped system to be installed. However, it is currently unknown-If
this "usable:'area" is Buff"icient"'in" size '-to afilow--the nsta.11at- on '
of the required amount of leaching area. Additional test pits may
have to be dug to determine ledge grades in this area.
The well serving this dwelling is presently located closer than
seventy-five (75) feet from the septic tank. The location of the
leaching area is unknown. The State Public Health Code does not
currently allow the installation of a septic system within 75 feet
of a well. The "usable area" referred to above is as close as
25 - 35 feet from the existing well. If this area were to be used-
for septic system installation, use of the well would have to be
discontinued and a new well drilled.
In summation, although the present septic. system is not currently
failing, the limited knowledge about it would indicate that it
cannot be expected to function too much longer. The lot is large
enough to accomodate a new septic system; however, an engineer
design would be needed and the system may have to be filled and
pumped. Also, a new well may have to be drilled to provide proper
separating distances.
Robert Dept,YAa, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
irk. `� �c�e�a -��r-�.c� ,vrr�'�� ..f:�
� � 6
, - �,= 0 ,
ram- � ���s.� � �
f-_--___s.�
(G) NEW BUSTNESS CC v
1. Beldon Road - 30-lot subdivision
( 6apuano Builders/Developers -plans by Design Professional of South
Windsor - dated February 1, 1990 - Pages 6-17 of 18 pages; 6 of 18,
through pages 7-18 inclusive. )
Steve Colbath of Design Professionals presented blueprints of a
proposed 30-lot subdivision, which had received approval from other
town agencies and had been reviewed by Mr. Shaw and the engineering
staff. Mr. Colbath discussed the location of the proposed sewer lines
and shown on the blueprints. The commission approved the 30-lot sub- `
division sewer system as shown on the blueprint presented with lateral
lines appropriately placed, on motion made by C. Westbrook, seconded by R. Dickinson, and by a-.unanimous vote.
2. #374 Abbe Rd., Extn. - .Kirby Holcombe - Sewer Discussion
Kirby Holcombe, property owner at 374 Abbe Rd., Extn. , discussed
the prospect of connecting into the sewer lines owned by Arthur Plumley
of 341 Abbe Rd. , Extn. He felt to make that connection- was too costly.
Mr. Carino noted that when a line is put in to serve an individual 's
property, it is the policy of the Commission that it is- shared by those
involved. Mr. Plumley had previously opted to pay for the installation
of a sewer line to his property, and if another property owner connects
to it, that property owner should share a portion of Mr. Plumley's costs.
Mr. Carino explained that if no one connects to Mr. Plumley's line, Mr.
Plumley bears the entire cost of the installation. If another property
owner wishes to connect, he should pay a fair share to Mr. Plumley. Mr.
Holcombe felt it was not cost effective for him to connect. Mr. Carino
said the W.P.C.A. had sought funding for this project, but was turned
down by the Town Council .
3. Manchester Sewer Agreement - Reference letter from Town of
Manchester dated December 4, 1990
Representatives from the Town of Manchester discussed the proposed
sewer lines needed to get started on their projects, the anticipated gallons
of flow per day, and presented blueprints of areas which would be affected.
The Commission granted conceptual approval to the Town of Manchester on
motion made by A. Falzarano, seconded by R. Dickinson, and by a unanimous
vote. Mr. Carino asked that plans and specifications be made available to
the Commission and said he would notify the Town Council of the conceptual
approval .
4. Pond Estates at Red Rock
Jay Giles of Fuss & O'Neill , a Manchester engineering firm,
presented specifications and plans for a 25-acre, 20-lot subdivision. He
sought the Commission's approval for a gravity feed line. After much
discussion and reviewing the prints, a motion was made by C. Westbrook
to approve the sub-division with a gravity feed line as shown on the
Key map - Pages 2-16, 7 of 16; Page 15 of 16, dated August 17, 1990,
subject to the South Windsor staff's technical approval and Manchester's
approval relative to South Windsor's sewer agreement with Manchester and
their requirements. C. Fletterick seconded the motion and it was approved
by a unanimous vote.
374 Abbe Road Ext.
South Windsor, Conn. 06074
April 23, 1991
Ms. Jean E. Zurbrigen
Town Manager
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Ave.
South Windsor, Conn. 06074
Re: Connection to sewer line.
Dear Ms. Zurbrigen,
Today my sewer contractor was denied a permit to begin construction of
a sewer line to serve my home. The sewer connection fee and the
$1,300.00 payment to my neighbor required by the sewer commission had
been paid.
At the March 19,1991 meeting of the sewer commission my plan for the
sewer connection was approved by the commission and m The Town was told I was looking to connect the first y plan submitted.
thought everything was set. part of April. I
Discussions with the Town Sewer Commission about connection to the
Town line have been going on for 21 years now. The Town holds a bond
in the amount of $10,000.00 primarily because my well is to insure correction of the problem,
too close to my septic field.
My septic field has now failed and is an odorous problem for my
neighbors and the leaching effluent threatens to contaminate my well.
I am presently having my well water tested. If I find it to be
contaminated I intend to hold the Town of South Windsor responsible.
For 21 years now I have pursed a reasonable solution to my sewage
disposal problems. The Town has moved painfully slow and has delayed
and obstructed my efforts to solve this problem. My intention would be
to recover from the Town the cost of a new well and the $1,300.00 paid
my neighbor if a different solution is necessary.
Please, can we not resolve this situation in 'a timely manner.
Ve t 1 urs,
Ki olcombe
cc: Attorney M. Lanza
e -
ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWERS
SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 2, 1990
UPDATED FOR
SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
JUNE 11, 1990
t '
r
M E M O R A N D U M
RE: ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWERS
In -the following chronology, those events, discussions, and
reports pertaining to the request for sanitary sewers are listed
for your review.
DATE DESCRIPTION
Nov. 3, 1987 Town Sanitarian inspection of
observation pits at 374 Abbe Road
Extension (owner Kirby Holcomb) .
House purchased and renovated by Mr.
Holcomb required issuance of a C.O. ;
existing metal septic tank and
location of well in 'relation to
septic system was in violation of
State regulations.
Nov. 17, 1987 Mr. Holcomb attends W.P.C.A. meeting
and requests extension of sanitary
sewer service.
Feb. 16, 1988 W.P.C.A. reviewed information
provided concerning existing sewer
servicing properties at #364 and #350.
Mar. 1, 1988 W.P.C.A. reviews fact sheet on
alternative ways of sewering area;
petition for sewers presented to
Authority.
Mar. 15, 1988 W.P.C.A. considers feasibility
of providing sewers by tie-in to
lateral serving lots #364 and #350.
Staff directed to determine actual
size of pipe.
Apr. 1, 1988 Staff reports that there are no
as-builts for 6-inch lateral; exact
location cannot be determined without
destructive .testing. Staff recommends
that if sewers are to be provided they
should be properly designed.
Memo
Re: Abbe Rd. Ext. - Sanitary Sewers
Page 2.
DATE DESCRIPTION
May 3, 1988 W.P.C.A. awaiting information from
Town Engineering Department.
June 7, 1988 W.P.C.A. reviews preliminary sewer
design and construction cost
estimates. Staff directed to prepare
a report for Town Council presentation.
July 26, W.P.C.A. reviewed draft of report to
Town Council.
Sept. 14, 1988 Report to Council submitted to Town
Manager for inclusion as a Council
Agenda item. Decision was made that
this should be included in the W.P.C.A.
budget request for FY 1989/1990.
Mar. 20, 1989 W.P.C.A. Budget FY 1989/1990
submitted for Council Approval.
$48,071 was requested for Abbe Road
Sewer; funding project was not proposed
in the Town Manager Budget.
Apr. 10, 1989 Town Council Budget Session for
Boards and Commission; meeting
attended by W.P.C.A. Chairman
and Staff representative (Supt.
Pollution Control) . Council had no
questions and supported Town Manager's
proposal.
May 1, 1989 Resident attends Town Council Regular
Meeting to request that funding be
reinstated. Mayor states that subject
will be discussed by Council at a
future Work Session.
May 16, 1989 Resident requests W.P.C.A. to
participate in Town Council Work
Session discussion concerning project
funding.
Res Abbe Rd. Ext. - Sanitary Sewers
Page 3.
BATE DESCRIPTION
June 6, 1989 W.P.C.A. informed that Council
will probably discuss issue at
June 26, 1989 work session.
Council Streeter expressed
Council's need to know if the Town
has any obligation to fund this
project.
June 1,9, 1989 Updated report to Town Council in
preparation of Work Session
presentation.
June 26, 1989 Council Work Session. Discussion of Abbe
Road Ext. sewer issue results in Council
request for more information and WPCA input.
August 17, 1989 Letter from Town Environmental Health
Officer recommending adjustment of
distribution box at 341 Abbe Rd. Ext.
September 1, 1989 Distribution box dug up by home-owner;
through 9/5, 1989 Health Officer inspected and determined
that this distribution box was "not a
causative factor of the failing septic
system".
September 19, 1989 Two year Abbe Rd. Ext. Sewer Project
chronology prepared by Town Public
Works Department. W.P.C.A. had requested
an engineering assesment of possible
solutions , and E. Lucek, civil engineer
hired by residents, states that need
exists and that while repair is
technically possible, sewers are the
most practical solution.
November 10, 1989 Plan for alternate sewer presented by
E. Lucek to Town Engineering and W.P.C.A.
January 2, 1990 W.P.C.A. requests detailed report analy-
zing costs and benefits of sewers vs.
replacement or repair of existing septic
systems .
Re: Abbe Rd. Ext. - Sanitary Sewers
Page 4.
DATE DESCRIPTION
January 23, 1990 Documented report issued by E. Lucek
concludes and recommends that sewers
are most cost effective and practical
solution.
February 16, 1990 Letter from R. Deptula indicating that
technically feasible alternatives to
sewers exist.
February 20, 1990 After additional discussion the W.P.C.A.
concluded that the area has health
problems and voted unanimously to request
funding for extension of the sewer line
on Abbe Rd. Ext.
March 23, 1990 W.P.C.A. letter indicates that no funds
are available; Item not submitted to
Town Council.
April 3, 1990 WPCA meeting - Engineering department
indicates that private sewer connection
at owner's expense might be accepted by
the town as a viable alternative in view
of budget situation. Affected property
owner installation of extended lateral
to existing sewer also discussed.
Z
4
.0
x
w
F `
1 lair
X * tt
_ t
PROJECT LOCATION
r
N.T.S.
4
U Robrit M.
C Joan T. Bi///. W.AC Lsl/is V. hl f,'LbwnQ
' V Lev:ratan F/O"*S I I P/aos/sy ( AWCor»bd
1 Yo% 9e, may. /d Vo% .I70,Al3dd y./. fe f�.5 Yo%4B6,f ?i3
jMain level l 1
� Sill. 23;W 1 1
X Main Main
Level Sill: 249.87 Level Sill:2441.09 11 ROfell101r lane
321 331 0/00
341 35 5 lic
1 A/ics B. Rodn�i
l VoL /o.t Pg.404 d'
i.r• 0....�.
1 I f .eiw a s_..
I Existing Son.k11 Ne92 1
$#a.let15.5 \ M
T F. 243.55
rL 232.20 \��i� N i •I
Ff
ioo•o�.�- ir:, o 'i � ioW_aN N iA_v•A.a t I ram' -'F�' 1sa�I•L4iI
,a 1 Son.Ib1 He 92 A
xo� 1 N
_ 1 ro.21+15.5
t -- - - u Cry.._. -- -r���'�`' -- -•r---,�_
iao•a.�i U I,1 i i/o.�s•a..i isv.�e•ow ' ( isi•a..i I I -_�-
"
330 HOP
:` N Y
Io's«S.--....sr•r Moira 374
Sill:24e.0e Main Level Sill:252.70
1
e M.Ns 35 Elev, 244 4f 1 350 �,.«< 1
Spike in 24"Oak to Main Level
I II J. Kirby C E/pins tf. Ho/com bvr
Sill.
n/i' Yo% S//, Ry.J4/
w1a4 Robe[f.G���tru/i L�ei,tAiciF
Yo% .t SS Py. 214
ouiae rock atop TotaOh ,T Ti. C Rhono/Hoic%
Vo% Soo.Fy,.SO6 Kr/sloe PLAN
Exhibit E
Request .for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
�7� � 8� ��• ExT
.� .r0 M((�� y F ,.r 4 r• f .'j.. r x � r >• .1. 1> � � �R it�' < ,,A t; Si 1• ram, r/(+'T'• 1 r .r ,,'1. Y"' i Ir/' ..r
y V _ Y' 'J•� •f � ,•�,- 'r 1 ',I,s' ..C�:1:.. �(( ,,` ,•.J, x�•J i'� J`• 1/•''r'.+th 1�'•-y� � ,.�: .y J,•\ •'f: i� = Y.r/ .I•:'t,,•..
�•� � I •�� 1 t: r 1 `` �.. 1. a -1Y j•. Y. Y .x •a .)vl I t"':r d i '•.� .t, t r 1 Yr: y i'• � r t.� :�' i- '
`w � t ♦ 2 f ! . Y�T.� S. �: �� ,J Fr�... ^. it •r
r v, �� �n,r• :� •�,s t' 2 ��yr i ,tip �,. ..,! ti �l " �t •S~��'�It<r i.,,G�� tl' : ` '-a,� :t T •r, ti
r ,:;. �'` ',�/� r2'.. f. ,t f. ^ r•+"` via J,p i, ++,v ,I y_..• �•y .+ i is
.!'` .��"� +�� 'i f ,'i ; .r:.�r ,•r .� ,f . e ! a '� �,, {I� '.> ^ rt+ !. t.1Ige •h i `,.- 11 4 r� Y '. t t.•ff� (:.�. �A� r :
QL
VV v � \ + � '�• f ' �}.^ it' .•...fir I+ s .11. .:!.a.,�.�*1 r .! u. iS'• 1 'rt' �r_•' "Y .t•a r a' `,F.' � 'i..
t ' _•? s. i ..x {. � ee, �� : i•� (-t} \ � V ��1 9'a � f '1 r, t 1.
• �. :r .. Q'.w.�=,rai.�.,. ."'1 '` h.a L, ., 'a D II r �
(�� 1 'f i r � '1 j`r s F M 1 :� Y'' � ' '.` ,•T f ) ` A I t
- r �% •� .r, � q tt \ �", 4ti,1f �N, 1� •w � J ' r t ' �, `t �- � s '
r
' 4 ��.t +• ."t••'p � 3' :/�' ,{ .` s_ -r4
i t ,,. � r - ! � '•c � � � \1'I+ + 'n'7�, �',, �' � ^� �•y aL ' �h� �• 1,.L i F1 .; Z,1q.
•r r tr' ,� 0 ,IPA Is� , ���y�` p �s y: fir`: `S i r! F'
ON
"�• . •4 :�' g ,. �V• �,,., .:Y+h:�•�,,,.M:T• _ �•: f ;� � � '�• t7�0 T e:. � jj`4 ° �' Il,
IlA' `` tl � '� 'rt: '.i• r� r. ( t.P � +.r �� fir' 1 a ., is .,.
1 •� Y7 n T d h. L. Y r �
. .. 1 '► q .I'r
d .
.� 1 � :� ., �� � �••w.-�•�.�...\ �( sue"��r� 4+..; s o3•:
'00
�•'a' r s ��s J I ,e, f • t tY'r V •i �r.�. ��y t�. ~ i+ r Y. f *' l,r•r�� ''I
' 't•::' t•` ', ai\ � uw T �, s '•� ' t s '� •j 2 'i ,•-e s ., •S.p~ �4 i' i i � 7f•' .r b ss
.� / r .R. r \' ;r .:t 2• •.• ( - .,r. . ..J..rts'.+ .�:�1 •tr yS ♦s',''� 2 c i t
�, • � \ '4 �. t r r i, � �' t ;; rl fr1' � 'r � � �•t C i
art' 'wV{�- �O ;� t � 6 •� 2i. •' r '( f.. �h r .�s • 1 F n+ rto �..�1 y.;w r� r, //��
4Vh r 1 r
It
�l
.+ t�' '`'r� � ���.•� ••� \ `;� � �i �v� �� °':rf ter+..w. t..� + � t,'3 } .�.. �• •�.
.t• try•: � �. .. r .. .� � '0•V � �' `, � \. i •' iF r i �,l 2 sr\ h .�, y � .:1 r.t t �.r lilt
'D •�� - J t`! 1 ♦ /� �'.�' �.,7'�'4 '1 • a = .�c>� r� - •: r 1 .rF. I �`' �JV.
;';� �s �; 'Y1 .� r �'K /�� � \ „ ,( � 1��1'O_�,O•`�' Y rT. r,�+J'�`, '� -"• `1 I� ; t �,k� -ti � 4( 1 �" ,� Q�
'.f:��. ��, � .. 'w tr`1 ,�. ^ �* .���'\.`\ y� �•, :af F� � .� xa, R'� 1 `�- f•A1� f+ ->'•ti '• .i'�. t S. .
't�/' r •A' ( �, V �. \•� '.� r t t r: it ��� a yr ! �I
i► R V ,�. l '� Q•�. Aj� o ,t{ �7 AK 'at! � Jr •t� f - ��, t :I� .. r
• f t r� •V:' � l �.. ,�� ``� � �• '1 t, ! is '"� �R � L'r f- I �y�,C ? • :I. ' •'.'.
.` s 'n' ('.�. p 2 (� t' R, r :'4 T r �r� '• ,�-' t;,�'�i� /w v i..-;-. �' t
•\ �,� '• '' t:.•� aJ� •� � �.�w4V.�����` i t• 4•� .Tysf 1{ri." Q i�'"E .y •"�` � , .x.
_ .;YI �• 1 , a r •`+ � •� � Y 6' \ �, ' o � "�s T, r�i•. K L � •r r� � T �• �F x t T' � t•
`�l,` YY 11 .:•4• t, .tA O. `4�,} �'�. •FV \ '�` � •Y� ' x H';.i ' a�as �� :•/L� \\9�i"rrlr F �i• ~S''Y "t i.•,.� � p � ,,
`' -.��. s �.i ` •� , /� y..(' � � � ti f w 4 N i.t T ?f fit; It r; 1 � M •,
�!1. ,�� 7 ,'t rl jr 4 `I•.0'� (1 •♦ n �, �} �. Yk ` :.r'�* 1 t •;+ y , ` 4 , a'i t.
"5', r itel lit N �l � 11 '\ C'7 J� a h' 1 Y � FA sX�`� l �rr 1 i �. .•'yl ' :} r" • r `. . l
.,t i 't i '•Q• � '�r •C,s ` � 0. � i ,'J M'•s� �X s'��rr . 'k,.. x ( fit, ` ! 1
,�1' F � � ���/. t. R M. ( ,, w� t .i t 'i 4i ••J. \ +li te' ..�.�.
, ,lt � .� % :1. r ,: •Q'� V �,\,r ''� .4 � v Y }y `+'�r".ti•ilrs 1 "i�.i�� �'.r�F.+.�;;r,�•v i ' �t' Xr.4 fr 1• 'F k' :t ��r:.t�r'e r; ` t ,,. Ft + I`ti,
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY '
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
March 7, 1990
Mr. and Mrs. Arthur L. Plumley
341 Abbe Road Extn.
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Plumley:
The Water Pollution Control Authority recently presented its pro-
posed budget - fiscal year 1990-91 - to the Town Manager.
After much discussion and deliberation with town staff, including
the town finance officer, Mr. Shaw and myself, the manager deter-
mined that funding is not available for sewer lines on Abbe Road
Extension, and that item has been removed from our budget.
As you are aware, it has not been determined that there is a serious
health hazard and there are economically feasible alternatives open
to you and, if undertaken in compliance with town requirements, would
be acceptable to the town.
If you wish to discuss these alternatives with the Commission, please
contact our office.
Sincerely,
Joseph Carino
Chairman
JC/br
3/7/90
MEMORANDUM September 5, 1989
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works (&)
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 341 Abby Road Extension
On Friday September 1, 1989, the property-owner excavated the
distribution box of his septic system as suggested in this
Department's letter to him dated 8-17-89 (copy enclosed) .
This distribution box was not tipped or dislodged as had been
theorized and therefore is not the causative factor of the
failing septic system.
The distribution box was observed to be full to overflowing with
effluent (above the top of the outlets) from the septic tank,
indicating that the two existing drywells are no longer capable
of absorbing effluent as quickly as it is discharged to them,
thus leading to system failure.
Solid material from the septic tank was also observed in the
distribution box. Solids should be retained in the septic tank
by means of a baffle at the outlet end. The property owner
indicated that he recalled the septic tank baffle being broken
but he could not recall if it had been repaired.
If it was not repaired, solids could have entered the leaching
areas (two existing dry wells) and clogged them, thus preventing
leachate from being absorbed.
It is currently unknown if indeed. this is the situation.
Excavation of the dry wells could determine if this is the
situation or if they are naturally no longer capable of
functioning.
The property-owner was informed by this department that this
further exploration may or may not produce positive results and
could be done or not, at his discretion.
Whatever the cause, the system is presently not functioning
properly and does indeed have periods where effluent does surface
on top of the ground.
Robert Deptula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
r
40wN sf'q
co
7OW;n 071e
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
soe.CC
oN� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
August 17, 1989
Mr. Arthur Plumley
341 Abby Road Ext.
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Plumley,
As we have discussed, due to the physical flow pattern within a
septic system (from the dwelling to the septic tank which retains
solids, to the distribution box which disperses effluent equally
to the leaching areas) it may be possible that an adjustment(s )
of the distribution box may solve the septic system problem.
As indicated above, the purpose of the distribution box is to
equally distribute liquid to the respective leaching areas . If,
during the process of backfilling the system, or if because of
settlement after construction, the distribution box became
tipped, equal distribution may not be occurring within the
system. Therefore, in this particular case, one of two drywells
(leaching areas ) may be receiving all of the effluent from the
dwelling, thereby causing premature failure of this one leaching
area, with the other dry well not receiving any effluent.
To determine if this has happened, the distribution box would
have to be excavated. This is a fairly simple process which can
easily be accomplished within one hours time by using a hand
shovel . Once the distribution box is excavated the cover would
be removed and the flow of leachate from it would be observed.
If indeed, all effluent was flowing to one leaching area,
adjustments would be made to equalize the flow. As a worse case
situation, the distribution box may have to be replaced. This
can also be accomplished by use of only a hand shovel, probably
within several hours time.
This department would be eager to provide Technical assistance to
you if you so desire. If you have any questions or if I can be
of further assistance, please contact me at the South Windsor
Town Hall 644-2511 extension 248 .
&4 .PJ
Robert Dep ula, R.S .
Environmental Health Officer
Cc: C.F. Shaw Superintendant of Pollution Control/Assistant
Director of Public Works
Lucek. Engineering Associates, Inc.
g
Consulting
Engineers & Land Surveyors
490 Buckland Road
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
1� 12 a hone (203) 644-2474
Emit W. Lucek, PE, LS
January 23 , 1990 `'"
Mr. Joseph Carino,ChairmanAA
P,._ . ..
Water Pollution Control Authority `
Town of South Windsor ;
South Windsor, CT 06084
RE: Request for sanitary sewer service
fJ. Kirby Holcombe
and Arthur Plumley, Abby Road Extension
Dear Chairman Carino,
At the January 2 , 1990 meeting of the WPCA the subject request
for sanitary sewer service
report discussed.
preparedAtanalyzing that eand u
directed that a detailed and benefits of providing sewer service
comparing the costs
as requested versus the replacement or repair
Thisfdocumentuwill
sewage disposal systems (septic systems) .
provide you with that analysis and comparison for your
consideration and action.
REASONS FOR REQUEST erties of the parties
It has been well documented that the pro P uate,
to this request contain
iolatetthesStateystems h at are e
ofConnecticutPublic .
are failing, and/or
Health Code. (see attached correspondence of obert3�19/88a,
South Windsor Environmental Health officer, 2/ improperly
and 9/5/89) . These parties are suffering and unattractive
functioning internal plumbing systems , unhealthy ro erty
outside yard conditions , andeviouslyt decreaseing
requestedthe1advice
value. Both parties have p
and assistance of the Env
inonthesel' Heal
t officer regarding
on site means of correcting
(Sub-
soils in this area are a Tisbury silt lloam,
a soil
which
characteristically suffers from a widely and underlain by
er
table, close to the surface in the spring
a compact layer causing poor internal drainage.
- 1 -
ALTERNATIVES TO SANTITARY SEWER SERVICE
374 Abby Road; Property of J.Kirby Holcombe
The existing septic system at this property violates
the Public Health Code in three areas.
1.Septic Tank is steel and too small.
2.Leaching area is too small.
3 .Well to septic system separating distance is not
sufficient: 40" exists; 75" required.
This is a dangerous combination. If the leaching area is
too small and the well too close, there is a real danger of
well-contamination.
Recent tests pits excavated by Mr. Holcombe in the presence '
of the Environment Health Officer indicated the possibility
of expanding the existing leaching area. If such an expansion
was done, the existing steel septic tank (probably 1000 gallon
capacity) should be replaced by a concrete tank of 1250 gallon
capacity. Further, the existing well must be abandoned and
a new well drilled. (Note: Testing showed that relocating
the leaching area is not feasible or practical because ledge
in other parts of the property is so shallow that the Public
Health Code requirements would again be violated) .
A COST ESTIMATE FOR THIS WORK IS AS FOLLOWS.
Pump, disconnect, remove and replace existing septic tank:
reconnect to system. $3200.
Enlarge leaching area $2000.
Disconnect, fill existing well, drill and reconnect
new well to house plumbing and electric $4500
TOTAL $9700.
This work would provide a workable septic system for this
property. However, the normally required system reserve area
would not be addressed. Further, because of the -high ground
water table, a continuing possibility of ground water
contamination would still exist.
341 Abby Road, Property of Arthur Plumley.
The existing septic system violates .the Public Health Code
in four areas :
1 . Septic tank too small
2. Leaching area too small
3 . Insufficient separating distance between bottom of drywell
and ledge
4 . Possible unbaffled septic tank.
2 -
This septic system is and has been documented as failing since
March, 1988 . Raw sewage effluent surfaces in the yard.
The Environmental Health Officer has suggested that an unbaffled
septic tank may be allowing solid wastes to enter and clog
the leaching areas.
To correct this problem, the existing septic tank and dry
wells must be removed; the septic tanks replaced, and a new
leaching field installed. In order to install an adequately
sized new leaching field, Public Health Code requirements
defining separating distances to the pool, to the property
lines, and to the storm sewer pipe which runs along the south
. edge of this property must be waived by the Environmental
Health Officer.
If these waivers were granted, the cost of this work would
be as follows:
Pump, disconnect, remove and replace existing
septic tank, reconnect to system $3 ,200 .
Remove dry wells , install new leaching fields ,
reconnect to septic tank $5 , 000 .
$8 , 200 .
Again, this work would not provide a reserve area or address
the problem of possible ground water contamination.
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION -
In November, 1989 , Lucek Engineering Associates proposed a
plan for extending sanitary sewer service to these properties.
The plan, as designed, would also provide sewer service to
two additional properties at #331 and #355 Abby Road. Bids
were solicited from area contractors, the low bid being
$20 ,800 . 00
TOWN INCOME FROM ASSESSMENTS
The WPCA staff has computed that assessment return to the
town for the ..extension would be about $13 ,000 . broken down
as follows :
331 Abby Road $2150 . & $400. connecting fee= $2550 .
341 Abby Road $2150. & `$40O-. -connecting fee= $2550 .
355 Abby Road $2883. & $400. connecting fee= $3283 .
374 Abby Road $4300. & $400 . connecting fee= $4700 .
TOTAL $13 , 083 .
The Town contribution would, therefore, be about $8000 . 00 .
3 -
y i b ti
SUMMARY
From a comparison of the costs, to the property owners, and
the town, it is obvious that the most cost-effective expenditure
by all parties is the extension of the sanitary sewer.
The sewer extension is a permanent solution to private and
public health concerns .
The sewer extension is a reliable solution which will function
essentially forever.
The sewer extension conforms to the Public Health Code and
the expressed purpose to the WPCA.
The sewer extension is the most logical and practical solution.
Re e tfully mitt d,
Emil W. Lucek
Conn Reg PELS 6293
4 -
A
Re
9'
t
is
P
M E M O R A N D U M September 14, 1989
TO: South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority
FROM: Fred Shaw, Ass't. Dir. of Public Works/Pollution Control
RE: ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWERS
In the following chronology, those events, discussions, and
reports pertaining to the request for sanitary sewers are listed
for your review. This subject will be an agenda item for the
next regular meeting of the Authority on September 19, 1989 .
DATE DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT
Nov. 3, 1987 Town Sanitarian inspection of --
observation pits at 374 Abbe Road
Extension (owner Kirby Holcomb) .
House purchased and renovated by Mr.
Holcomb required issuance of a C.O. ;
existing metal septic tank and
location of well in relation to
septic system was in violation of
State regulations.
Nov. 17, 1987. Mr. Holcomb attends W.P.C.A. meeting A
and requests extension of sanitary
sewer service.
Feb. 16, 1988 W.P.C.A. reviewed information B
provided concerning existing sewer
servicing properties at #364 and #350.
Mar. 1, 1988 W.P.C.A. reviews fact sheet on C
alternative ways of sewering area;
petition for sewers presented to
Authority.
Mar. 15, 1988 W.P.C.A. considers feasibility D
of providing sewers by tie-in to
lateral serving lots #364 and #350.
Staff directed to determine actual
size of pipe.
Apr. 1, 1988 Staff reports that there are no E
as-builts for 6-inch lateral; exact
location cannot be determined without
destructive testing. Staff recommends
that if sewers are to be provided they
should be properly designed.
Memo
To: W.P.C.A.
Re: Abbe Rd. Ext. - Sanitary Sewers
Sept. 14, 1989
Page 2 .
DATE DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT
May 3, 1988 W.P.C.A. awaiting information from F
Town Engineering Department.
June 71 1988 W.P.C.A. reviews preliminary sewer G
design and construction cost
estimates . Staff directed to prepare
a report for Town Council presentation.
July 26, 2989 W.P.C.A. reviewed draft of report to H
Town Council.
Sept. 14, 1988 Report to Council submitted to Town I
Manager for inclusion as a Council
Agenda item. Decision was made that
this should be included in the W.P.C.A.
budget request for FY 1989/1990 .
Mar. 20, 1989 W.P.C.A. Budget FY 1989/1990 J
submitted for Council Approval.
$48,071 was requested for Abbe Road
Sewer; funding project was not proposed
in the Town Manager Budget.
Apr. 10, 1989 Town Council Budget Session for --
Boards and Commission; meeting
attended by W.P.C.A. Chairman
and Staff representative (Supt.
Pollution Control) . Council had no
questions and supported Town Manager' s
proposal.
May 1, 1989 Resident attends Town Council Regular K
Meeting to request that funding be
reinstated. Mayor states that subject
will be discussed by Council at a
future Work Session.
May 16 , 1989 Resident requests W.P.C.A. to L
participate in Town Council Work
Session discussion concerning project
funding.
Memo
To: W.P.C.A.
Re: Abbe Rd. Ext. - Sanitary Sewers
Sept. 14, 1989
Page 3 .
DATE DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT
June 6, 1989 W.P.C.A. informed that Council M
will probably discuss issue at
June 26, 1989 Work Session.
Council Streeter expressed
Council's need to know if the Town
has any obligation to fund this
project.
June 19, 1989 Updated report to Town Council in N
preparation of Work Session
presentation.
June 26, 1989 Council Work Session (Abbe Road Ext. 0
issue was not included as an agenda
item. )
Sept. 5, 1989 Town Environmental Health Officer's P
report of failing septic system at
341 Abbe Road Extension.
'Re3iAtCW 67
(D) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Items Not On Agenda)
There was no one present from the public under this category .
(E) BILLS , CHANGE ORDERS , DISBURSEMENTS
None .
Mr . Falzarano made a motion to suspend the rules and go to item
G . 1 . New Business . Mr . Lanza seconded the motion . Motion unani-
mously carried .
(G) NEW BUSINESS
1 . Sewer Connection - 350 Abbe Road Extension (Kirby Holcombe)
Mr . Holcombe was present to address the W. P . C. A. He said in
the opinion of a drain layer regarding his septic system, it is
on its way out . Mr . Holcombe said he had testing done on his
property and there is alot of ledge. He said there is only one
spot on the 2 acre piece of property that is suitable for a
septic system. The problem is that the well is too close and
would have to be moved .
Mr . Shaw said Mr . Holcombe owns a lot just north of the second
house that Mr . Kelley connected two properties into a single
�•. lateral several years ago . These two houses are located on the
east side of Abbe Road Extension .
Mr . Shaw said Mr . Deptula , the Environmental Health Officer, has
looked at Mr . Holcombe ' s septic system and said it is in need of
replacement and since the septic system is located so close to
the well , Mr . Holcombe would have to go to the State for a
variance . Mr . Shaw said Mr . Deptula feels that the State would
allow Mr . Holcombe to do this .
Mr . Shaw said in the past we have allowed two houses to
connect to a single lateral . Allowing Mr . Holcombe to connect
to thislateral and becoming. a third house on a single lateral ,
would be a first . Since this sewer line is on private property ,
it would require some kind of an easement or agreement even
though the W. P . C . A. allows it .
Mr . Holcombe said he has since discussed connecting to this
line with the two property owners that are involved since the
discussion he had with Mr . Shaw. There is a question as to
whether they ran a 6 inch line all the way up to the property
or they went with the four inch .
Mr . Lanza asked if there was another alternative.
l .
-3- CxRIBIr
Mr . Holcombe said he spoke with a neighbor acros the street
and he said he would like to see the sewer line extended from
where is stops now on Abbe Road Extension, which is where the
cross country line comes in to Mr . Holcombe 's property .'
Mr . Lanza asked if the lateral could be upgraded in 'order for
Mr . Holcombe to connect to it . Maybe this would be the most ,
_ cost effective .
Mr . Carino said there are different ways of handling this :
I . -Extend the existing private lateral to the
Kirby Holcombe residence to accommodate three
houses instead of two .
2 . Make an engineering study to determine the feasibility
Of putting in a sewer and extend the sewer from where
we are at now as far as we think is necessary to service
houses in that area .
3 . Treat this lateral and get an agreement between the
property owners and then take it over as a cross country
line with an easement .
4 . Look at the feasibility of just hooking in the Holcombe
property and the possibility of coming across the frontage
of the property and hooking some of these others into
that line and service whoever we can .
Mr . Carino asked Mr . Holcombe if he can use his septic system for
a little while longer .
Mr. Holcombe said "Yes . "
Mr. Carino asked Mr . Shaw to discuss this matter with the Town
Staff and report back to the Commission.
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 . Proposal for Developers Contributing to Upgrading the
Benedict Drive Pump Station (Assessment Subcommittee)
Mr . Lanza said .since Mr . Alexander is not present at this meeting
he is not prepared to discuss this item.
Mr . Lanza said Mr. Alexander told him have a meeting with .that he is willing to to
the subcommittee on this item outside a
W. P . C . A. meeting .
The new Assessment Subcommittee will be Mr . Lanza, Mr . Carino ,
and Mr . Dickinson .
Mr . Carino asked Mr . Lanza to get in touch with Mr . Alexander
as to when he is available to have a meeting with the subcommittee
and to get in touch with him.
Regular Meeting - February 16, 1088 W. D. C. A. Minutes of Meetir.z
3
of 491 Buckland Road , South Windsor. The Project title is
Roncalli at South Windsor, Roncalli Institute address is 421
Main Street , Cromwell . Drawing? Title is Sanitary Sewer Easements
Sheet No. 1 of 1. The -approval will be subject to our acceptance
and approval of the easement. It was seconded by Mr. Dickinson
and voted approved by Mrs . 'les tbrook, Mr. Dickinson, Mr.
Kupchunos , Mr. Carino and Mr. Lanza. Mr. Falzarano abstained .
Mr. DeMallie said in response to a questior. from !'Irs. 'r!esthrook that
it was hoped the building would be completed and occupied by loPo.
A motion was ma0e , seconded and approved that the commissior move
on to (r) Item 2 on the adRenda which was a request for return of
Connection Fee by Mrs . Sunderland of 1[t Strong Road who had ar-
rived earlier as was noted on pare one of the minutes . The back-
ground of this was that (lue to minor trouble with her septic system
Mrs. Sunderland wanted to connect to the sewer line along Strong
Road . She had understood the cost was going to be about $1,eOO.
but when she went to connect , she found after hiring a contractor
that the cost was going to be much more than $l,t00., possibly
another $5000yplus because well was located in close proximity to
where tree pipe going to the sewer would have to run and State
regulations required a duct iron pipe rather than plastic . Costs
were increased because there was no lateral going to the main line.
Since she had already given the contractor y$800 for two ser)arate
d,wellin�: units in this house (2 connection fees of �00. each) the
'000. check was paid to the Tourn and she had some concern about
going ahead with the project. Her letter said that the problem
went away. Mr. Sh nw had discussed this with the Town Sanitation
Officer, the septic system is functioning adequately now and she
would like to get the $800.00 back. A motion was made, seconded
and approved to direct the Collector of Revenue of Town of. South
Windsor to .refund her $800.00 payments for connection fees. Mr.
Shaw told them he would send a letter to the Tax Collector this
week and put the return of her money in motion.
Mr. Lanza suggested that they move to Item (E) on the adPenda
(F ) BILLS, CHAP.7F ORDrR ,D D IS BU.IS-17.7?TS
None
(1171 ) TINFINIS1FD 13 SINFSS
le* 1. Sewer Connection - 374 Abbe Road Ext . (Kirby Holcomb )
Mr. Shaw gave commission the backfzround information he had on
this conrection to hook into long lateral which serves two houses .
Mr. Holcomb gave Mr. Shaw some information which he was not aware
of and Shaw expects to meet with Bob Deptula the Town Sanitarian
and go over the information. Mr. Shaw had a written report and
shared some of the information with commission members as to cost
of this connection in the range of $47,000. , the fact that there
was not a failed sewer system involved here but one that could
be brought up to c o('e with some modifications . Mr. Shaw said-
they would discuss this situation at another ti^:e when they have
obtained more information.
n
n//' Arthv/L.�'Ho��ttS .J�Fi'rsy hlf,'GbwnG.
Rbrie a ,ro T.an Bi//y W.
o M. Lss/ie V. I P/vim/`y I /SfO/eoinba
I Levineon Fionks I 9 / 9e Yo% 486�i 8i3
Yo/. . , �. /8 Vo% 4 78�f�3�d t
.� 0 f
1 t
1 Main Level 1
' Sill. 24 r.8^v main 11 Rosemary lane
Main
X level Sill: 249.87 Level Sill:2411.09 h//,
W 321 331 341 355 A/ici B. fTodn��
Yo%
1
on:w.�. t
` Row e-rs.... 1 1
1 1 r 1
I Existing Son.Mi N=92
M
sto.WtI5.5 \ A
TF. 243.55 \�i\ e •
rl 232.20 ��f� `� N Ih1 ICY 1 ssi.si•�--� —
IZ
�.... , ( N Son.MI N2 92A
of—�
zo 1 Sto.21t15.5
OL
i iVil
11
11 le E���st• +�
330 �n '
r,
1 364 374
II >._.. Main Level
Main Level Sill:252.78
p Sill:248.08
1 11 �wEtc
n 350
B.M.N=35 Elev� zaa a6 Zp .T. Kirby t. E/oint K. /`/o/coin
Spike in 24"Oak =II Main Level Yo% .T//, P�•-7+�/
1
I1) Si11:245.84 0/�
��,�,«< ?Robsif P.G ��fsuds Oenshic/r
/f Vo% SD, Pp. 2/6
n
ouise Tock aeon TosePh J Z. C Rhona Moic% PL AN
Yo% Soo.Py.Sob Kr/Stan
Vol 932, 917./8/
' i
3 i-A i B IT
e
(D) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ( Items Not On Agenda)
There was no one present from the public under this category .
(E) BILLS , CHANGE ORDERS , DISBURSEMENTS
None .
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
i . Treatment Plant Modifications
Mr . Shaw said the belt press improvements are proceeding slowly .
The contractor is having M. B . E . problems . He said the contractor
didn ' t want to follow the plan the way the engineer designed it ,
however , he was informed that the problem has been resolved .
2 . Sewer Connection - 374 Abbe Road Extension(Kirby Holcomb)
Mr . Shaw reviewed the report titled "Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary
Sewer Alternatives - Fact Sheet" dated February 29 ,1988 . (See
Attached) .
Mr . Lanza asked that the record show he could not vote on this item
because his law firm is involved . _ _ _
Mr . Robert Denshick - 364 Abbe Road Extension
Mr . Denshick said he was assessed for the front of his property when
the lateral was installed several years ago . He said at that time , `
he was told he would -have to main the sewer if the pipe broke .
Mr . Denshick said he asked who would maintain the pipe from his
house to the road . Mr . Denshick said he has an agreement with the
Town that they would maintain the line right up to his property.
He was ' told that if anyone connected to his line , it would nullify
any agreement that he made with the Town .
Discussion followed .
Mr . Shaw said in looking at the minutes , there was to be a single
lateral to serve two properties .
Mr . Carino said this is a private line . Therefore , the Town doesn ' t
have any responsibilities for that line .
Mr . Lanza said based on what the Town Sanitary says in his memo ,
there isn ' t a need for sewers at this time . (See Attached) .
Mr . Arthur Plumley - 341 Abbe Road Extension
Mr . Plumley said things are alright if the water table is down .
When there is large usage, he gets water coming up and this creates
a nuisance . He said instead of going to the expense of putting in
a new septic system, he would rather be able to connect to the sewer .
Mr . Shaw asked Mr . Plumley if he is experiencing problems in the
house .
Mr . Plumley said he has surface water .
Mr . Bill Frank Jr . - 331 Abbe Road Extension
Mr . Frank said sometimes he experiences backing up . He has only
lived at this address since last April . Mr . Frank said the manhole
is right at the end of the driveway . He said it is a logical
assumption, at least to him, that he can tie-in to the manhole .
Mr . Lanza asked Mr . Denshick if he would have any objections to
Mr . Holcomb hooking into his lateral .
Mr . Denshick said he believes if he allows this to happen, it will
nullify the agreement he has with the Town.
Further discussion followed .
Mr . Lanza asked Mr . Holcomb what his feelings are regarding putting
in a new septic system.
Mr . Holcomb said other than the expense , we have to consider that
there is alot of ledge in this area .
Further discussion followed.
Mr . Shaw said last fall , people from Berle Road came to the W. P . C . A.
to ask for sewers in that area. He said that the position of the
Commission is if there is no evidence of a failed system, the
Town would not consider putting in sewers . However , the Commission
did tell the Berle .Road residents that the Town would design a sewer
and the sewer would be installed if the residents paid the entire
cost .
Further discussion followed .
The Commission asked that the terms of the easement be looked at .
The Commission also asked that Mr. Deptula report as to whether
there is a house in that area that has a septic system failing .
Mr . Dickinson asked that an 8 X 11 inch sketch of the properties
on Abbe Road Extension be sent to the Commission members along
with the agenda for the next meeting .
The Commission was presented with a petition for sewers by the
Abbe Road Extension property owners present . (See Attached) .
w r
ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWER ALTERNATIVES
FACT SHEET
Objective: Respond to request for sanitary sewer service made by
owner (K. Holcomb) of property at 374 Abbe Road Extension.
Current Status : Existing sanitary sewer on Abbe Road Extension terminates
at a distance of about 300 feet south of said property. A common 6 inch
lateral serves two lots (364 and 350) adjacent to and south of said
property. There is no as-built plan for this lateral, nor is there an
easement in favor of the Town of South Windsor.
Extension of the sewer 300 feet along Abbe Road Extension to reach 374,
would provide service to three other properties in this area.
There is no evidence of a failure of the septic system at 374 Abbe Road
Extention, and the present need to replace the septic tank is to satisfy
a regulatory requirement. (Exhibit A) .
There has been no petition received by the W.P.C.A. from a majority of
the residents in this area requesting an extension of the sewers.
Alternative Sewer Construction
1. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 364 and 350 Abbe Road Extention - lateral
remains private.
2. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 350 and 364 - Town assumes ownership and
maintainance responsibility of lateral.
3 . Town installs sewer in road to serve 374 Abbe Road Extension
and three other lots not presently fronting on a sewer (350
and 364 are connected to the sewer and have both been assessed) ;
Town assumes ownership and maintenance responsibility for line.
4. Town installs sewer off road to serve 374, and three other lots;
Town assumes ownership and maintenance for line.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 1 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
Alternative 2 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
` *Town unable to clean small
lateral with equipment in
current use.
*Town assumes risk of lateral
maintenance and repair.
3 `3 ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 3 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47, 696)
` suitable capacity.
*Proper design facilitates *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
required. )t4v` r
Alternative 4 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47,949 )
suitable capacity
*Proper design facilitites *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
not required.
SEWER ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS - TOWN INSTALLED SEWER
Alternative 3 (In Road) Alternative 4 (Off Road)
a. Construction Costs: ($47 ,696) ($47,949)
b. Funding Sources
i. Sewer Assessments 11,492 � , 11,492
ii. Connection Fees 1 , 600 ' 1,600 _
iii.• Funding Short Fall 634 ,604) ( TT,85 7) �
• C-•X 1-t i 8 i i C
1'
Request for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
J7-1 /D. E'x7-
Ae-
121 Fx
rc-k, 15)t 1 a�
Mr . Carino made a motion that the W. P . C . A . consider sewering
up to four houses on the south side of Chapel Road on Long Hill
Road , to the technical feasibility of sewering 2 ,3, or 4 houses ,
depending on the engineering analysis of the slopes and the depth
of the sewer line in Chapel Road and the height of these four
houses relative to the sewer line , which could result in gravity
flow.
Mr . Gay seconded the motion . Motion unanimously carried .
3 . Sewer Connection - 374 Abbe Road Ext . (Kirby Holcomb)
Mr . Holcomb , 374 Abbe Road Extension and Mr . Plumley, 341 Abbe Road
Extension were present to hear the W. P . C . A. discuss the situation
that exists on Abbe Road Extension . Mr. Holcomb is seeking permission
from the W. P . C . A. to tie-in to the Denshick/Cotton lateral .
Mr . Plumley has a septic system that is failing , according to Town
Sanitarian Robert Deptula . (See attached memo) .
Mr . Shaw directed the W. P . C . A . members to look at their packet
concerning Abbe Road Extension .
Discussion followed .
Mr . Carino asked Mr . Shaw if a six inch sewer line was put in .
Mr . Shaw said he doesn ' t know because the Town never received as-
builts .
Further discussion followed .
Mr . Carino said not only is it important to know if there is a
six inch pipe , it is also important to know the depth of that pipe .
Further discussion followed .
Mr . Carino suggested if there is a 6 inch pipe , the W. P. C . A .
consider the houses on the west side of Abbe Road Extension (Lots
4 , 5 , & 6 ) for sewering off the road , to be connected from Lot 4-331
to the manhole so we don ' t have to dig up the pavement .
Mr . Carino suggested that Mr . Holcomb be the only one to connect
to the cross country line on the Denshick/Cotton easement..
Mr . Lanza asked the members if this project bears additional
consideration by the W . P . C . A . if this is a 6 inch line.
The Commission Members said "Yes . "
Mr . Shaw was asked by the Chairman to have his Staff check to see
if this is a 6 inch line .
-4-
Mr . Lanza asked that this item be placed on the agenda for the
next regular meeting .
(G) NEW BUSINESS
1 . One Lot On Farmstead Road - South Windsor Heights -
Re-Subdivision (Emil Lucek)
Mr . Lucek was present to ask approval for a one lot subdivision .
He said he has already been to Planning & Zoning . He needs to
extend the sewer 125 feet and put in one manhole . The property
is at the end of a cul-de-sac . Mr . Lucek said he would like the
Town to take ownership of 125 feet of the sewer .
Mr . Shaw asked if there is any potential to extend the road .
Mr . Lucek said "NO . " He said the only house to connect to the
sewer is this one lot .
Mr . Shaw said the Staff looked at the plans and has no problems
with them.
The W . P . C . A. reviewed the plans with Mr . Lucek.
Mr . Carino made a motion to accept the proposal of the one lot
subdivision presented by Emil Lucek - South Windsor Heights -
632-A, subject to the following conditions :
1 . The approval is subject to the technical approval
of the Town Staff .
2 . The approval letter must be affixed to the final set
of mylars and filed with the Town of South Windsor .
3 . The manhole being located in the center of the
traveled portion of the road .
Mr . Gay seconded the motion . Motion unanimously carried .
2 . 1987 Industrial/Commercial Sewer User Charges
Mr . Carino made a motion to accept the 1987 Industrial/Commercial
Sewer User Charges as presented by Mr . Shaw in his memo of
March 15 , 1988 and attached to these minutes . Mr . Falzarano
seconded the motion . Motion unanimously carried .
P
March 14, 1988
MEMORANDUM
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works/
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: Numbers 331, 341, 355 Abby Road Ext.
A sanitary survey was conducted at the above referenced
properties. Following are the results:
#331 This property is currently for sales. The property owner
reports that sometimes drainage from the fixtures is very
slow, and that sometimes the downstairs toilet must be
flushed twice. If he does not sell his property, he wants
the sewer line extended.
#341 This property presently has a failing septic system. (Area
of sewage overflow in rear yard) . The owner wants the
sewer line extended.
#355 This property owner reports having no problems with his
septic system, and there was no evidence of failure. H
wants the sewer line extended.
Robert Deptula, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
-3-
(E) BILLS , CHANGE ORDERS , DISBURSEMENTS
Chairman Lanza presented the following bill for consideration :
1 . Mankey Associates $2 , 707 . 00
Garage Improvements
FINAL BILL
Mrs. Westbrook made a motion to pay Mankey Associates , FINAL PAYMENT
in the amount of $2 , 707 . 00 for his work on the garage improvements .
Mr . Falzarano seconded the motion . Motion unanimously carried .
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 . Treatment Plant Modifications
Mr . Shaw said the project is close to completion . However, he had
to prepare a change order for time extension on this project . The
contractor had problems with his subcontractor on the Minority
Business Enterprises requirement . The contractor has since hired
a different subcontractor . Mr. Shaw discussed this with the State
and there is no problem. This doesn ' t mean there will be additional
costs involved , just the extension of time.
Jr- 2 . Sewer Connection - 374 Abbe Road Extension (Kirby Holcomb)
Mr . Shaw said he was asked to go out and determine if there is a
6 inch pipe in the ground on Abbe Road Extension. He said the Town
doesn ' t have an as-built drawing on this project . There is concern
regarding using the pipe to service six houses . He said the problem
is that the pipe is not visible and the clean outs do not come to
the surface . Mr. Shaw said the Town doesn ' t know exactly where the
pipe is . The only way they can find out is to dig up the ground .
Mr . Shaw said this pipe was designed as a lateral . It wasn ' t
designed to be maintained by the Town . The Town doesn ' t have
adequate facilities to get in there and clean it . Mr. Shaw said the
sewer should be designed properly so that the Town can maintain it .
Mr . Shaw said he discussed the Cotton/Denshick easement agreement
with the Town Attorney ' s partner , and he says we have no responsibility
to maintain this line .
Mr . Denshick was present at this meeting 'and he remembers that when
this matter was first discussed , several years ago , the Town said
that they would maintain the cross country line right up to his
house .
Fx I lialI-T
-4- ,
Mr . Lanza said the W . P . C . A . has not ruled that this easement
is not enforceable nor has it ruled that they have no obligation
to maintain the. lateral .
Mr . Lanza asked that this item be put on the agenda for the next
meeting when Mr . Carino can be present to vote whether the Commission
wants to proceed in putting in a sewer in Abbe Road Extension .
(G) NEW BUSINESS
1 . Clover Meadows - Sewer Approval (William Aman - Developer)
Mr.. Aman from Wilmar Construction was present to present his proposal
to the W. P . C . A. He said this involves 17 lots on Clark Street and
Strong Road . He said this is a gravity system to' an established
manhole .
Mr . Shaw said the Town Staff has reviewed this proposal and has no
problems with it .
The proposal has already been presented to Planning & Zoning .
Mr . Falzarano made a motion to approve the proposal of Clover Meadows
as presented by Mr . Aman , as shown on a map dated 11/24/86 - Project
#86001 - Sheet 4 of 12 - Scale one inch equals 40 feet, with the
following conditions :
1 . This project receives the technical approval of the
Town Staff .
2 . This approval letter is affixed to the final set of
mylars ' and filed with the Town of South Windsor.
3 . The manhole is located- in the center of the travelled
portion of the road .
Mr . Gay seconded the motion . Motion unanimously carried.
2 . Two Lot Subdivision - Sewer Approval - Avery Street
(Robert & Carol Hatch)
Mr . & Mrs . Mario Burgio were present to seek approval for a two
1•ot subdivision on Avery Street .
Mr . Gay made a motion to accept the proposal to sewer a two lot
subdivision on Avery Street , as shown on a map dated 3/29/85 -
Revised map 3/19/87 - Project #85-021. - Page. Engineering - subject
to the following conditions:
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 312RIO aA+os�ns3siss�
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
MAY 3, 1988
Vice-Chairman Carino called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M.
(A) ROLL CALL
Present: '
Vice-Chairman Carino, Mr. Dickinson, Mr. Falzarano, Mr. Gay,
Mr. Kupchunos
Absent: Mrs. Westbrook
Also Present: Mr. Shaw
(B) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS ,
Vice-Chairman Carino presented the following minutes for consideration:
1. April 19, 1988 - Regular Meeting
Mr. Falzarano made a motion to accept the minutes of the April 19, 1988 regular
meeting as presented. Mr. Gay seconded the motion. Motion unanimously carried.
(C) COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
1. Superintendent of Pollution Control
Mr. Shaw had nothing to report that was not on the agenda.
2. Council Liaison
Not present at this meeting. -
3. Commissioners
Mr. Carino asked if the Long Hill sewers is moving along well.
Mr. Shaw said he thinks that this is one of the items that had been approved.
Mr. Carino asked why the Abbe Road Extension project wasn't an agenda item.
Mr. Shaw said we can leave this on the agenda if the Commission so desires. However,
he is waiting for information from the Engineering Department concerning the design.
They have been directed to pursue a survey and design and to come back with a cost
estimate.
4. Other Agencies
None.
(D) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Items Not On Agenda)
There was no one present from the public at this meeting.
C
RLi.F 01,,r-- Me4F; m 7TL.4,' 7 EX 14 1 S 1-V
-2-
4 . Other Agencies
None .
(D) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Items Not On Agenda)
There was no one present from the public under this category .
(E) BILLS , CHANGE ORDERS , DISBURSEMENTS
None .
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 . Treatment Plant Modifications
Mr . Shaw said the contractor is completing the punch list items
and are substantially complete . He said he is meeting with the
contractor tomorrow to discuss the few items that are left to be
done .
c - 2 . Abbe Road Extension (Sewer Construction Estimate)
Mr . Shaw said the Engineering Department has put together a preliminary
design as well as a cost estimate .
Mr . Shaw said he was asked to look at all the alternatives for sewering
this area . The cost to put it off the road was pretty much the same
as putting the sewer in the middle of the road . Therefore, it was
decided to put it in the middle of the road , so it is easier to
maintain . This would involve sanitary sewer service to 331 , 341 ,
and 355 , as well as the opposite side of the road, 374 . 350 and 364
are connected to a sewer lateral . Mr. Shaw passed out a cost estimate
to the W. P . C . A. for this project . (See attached) .
Mr . Shaw said he would like to arrange a presentation for the Town
Council . Also he would like to discuss the approach that we should
take with the Finance Director . He would like to approach the Council
sometime in July .
Mr . Carino asked Mr . Shaw to calculate the actual assessments and
put together Bob Deptula ' s reports and other reports that support
this . Mr . Carino said we had four options . Tell the Council why
we chose this option .
(G) NEW BUSINESS
1 . Heather Farms - Sewer Approval (William Grace)
Mr . Grace was present to seek sewer approval for Heather Farms . He
f said this is 1 , 300 feet of a sewer line connecting Kent Lane and
Evans Crossing . Mr . Grace said he received Planning and Zoning and
Inland/Wetland approval . He said the plans the W. P . C . A. is looking
at are Final plans . Thirteen lots are involved .
Ex1�1grTC
- J ISOC•y Q- - 6b - �� ^
--- _......=w_ Pc.c,�.�,.-._ cwni•"c, -.—Soo L.s= 4
-- ._.�Gtn!`t�l� �wa,- Lcc•1-..�yK�3 -_.___ --------� rJ� --L,F c') �rJ G SOS
17ov
550
Soo
� 000 ---__
e
' ' �la� w«�.a-►n o -3- EX 1 I�' H
7'U0 U, z U � F
I�
Mr. Carino said the W. P. C. A. can't take action of this at this time, as
the Commission members haven't had the opportunity to look over the Town
Attorney's letter and digest the Proposed Draft Agreement.
Mr. Carino asked Mr. Shaw to have the Town Attorney look at the Proposed Draft
by Mr. Jacques and see if it is satisfactory to him.
Mr. Jacques and his attorney, Michael Ziska were present at this meeting.
I
Mr. Carino said the Commission should corrdinate with the developer to see
what his target dates are for completion of his projects. He said a reason-
able number of houses should cause that pump station to funtion efficiently.
I
Mr. Ziska said he would like some idea as to which option the Commission would
prefer.
Mr. Carino asked the Commission which option they would prefer and they all
agreed that they would prefer Option #3, with the understanding that we work
on the percentage of completion of homes.
Mr. Carino pointed out that he didn't want to enter into an agreement with T. & M.
He said he just wants a two-way agreement with Mr. Jacques and the Town.
Mr. Carino said T. & M. is still responsible for the station. If Mr. Jacques
takes over the station, the obligation becomes his.
I
Mr. Ed Waltman of T. & M. was present at this meeting and he said T. & M. is
agreeable to work with Mr. Jacques.
Mr. Carino asked Mr. Shaw what happens if we take over the pump station and we
have to go to the Council for monies to maintain that station.
Mr. Shaw said the Commission can enter into agreements without going to the
Council. He said as far as money is concerned, he doesn't believe we will have
to go to the Council as we have user and connection fees to help cover the costs.
3. Abbe Road Extension Sewer - Council Presentation
Mr. Shaw reviewed his presentation with the Commission.
Mr. Carino suggested that Mr. Shaw put the health considerations after the I
background, not the costs. (See attached) . He also. told Mr. Shaw to weigh
heavily on Mr. D.eptula's reports.
i
Discussion followed.
i
Mr. Carino told Mr. Shaw he would go with him to present the report to the Council.
He asked other Commission members to be present if it is possible.
i
I�
�X 13 I T �
U1 t.
G U
Q w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
~asoR.00 AREA CODE 203/644-2511
September 14 , 1988
Members of the Town Council
South Windsor Town Hall
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Councillors:
RE: Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
The Water Pollution Control Authority (W.P.C.A. ) requests Town
Council consideration to fund a project to extend sewers on Abbe
Road Extension. This project involves the construction of
approximately 300 feet of gravity sanitary sewer that will serve
four residential units . (Exhibit A, attached)
This project is in response to a petition requesting sewer
service signed by all the property owners; and the W.P.C.A. has
determined by survey results that there is a need for sanitary
sewers in this area.
Background
The first request for sewers in this area was made by the
property owner at 374 Abbe Road Extension. A septic system
inspection completed by the Town ' s Environmental Health Officer
(Exhibit B, attached) indicated that while the existing septic
system had not yet failed, there were signs that the system was
near the end of its useful life, and that a costly replacement of
the septic system would be required.
The W.P.C.A. investigated alternative methods of assisting this
property owner, which included this use of an existing lateral
currently serving the properties - #364 and #350 ( Exhibit C,
attached) ; it was concluded that a Town sewer was the most
feasible alternative (Exhibit D , attached) .
This property owner was informed as to the W.P.C.A. requirement
that a request for sanitary sewer service must include a petition
for such services signed by a . majority of the affected property
owners. A petition was subsequently submitted to the W.P.C.A.
(Exhibit E, attached) , and included three additional properties.
Members of the Town Council
RE : Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 2 .
The Environmental Health Officer was requested by the W.P.C.A. to
conduct a sanitary survey, the results of which indicated that at
least one system was in the processing of failing (Exhibit F ,
attached )
The lots in this area are without city water service and
therefore depend upon wells for potable water. The lots are not
large, and because of the need for wells and other evidence
suggesting the presence of ledge and a high ground water table,
there are limited opportunities for installation of new septic
systems . Because of these factors, the W.P.C.A. considered
sewers to be the most reliable alternative to protect the public
health in this area.
Cost Analysis
The W.P.C.A. considered the sewer avoidance costs of septic tank
replacements in this area where there was ledge, limited lot size
(AA30) , and no city water, and it was determined that such costs
for each property owner would be in the range of between $6 ,000
and $8 ,000 .
The cost to the property owners for sanitary sewers were
calculated as follows:
#374 #355 #341 #331
1. Sewer Assessment
Base Charge $1 ,000 $1 ,000 $1,000 $1 ,000
Frontage 2,400 1 ,284 1,200 1 ,200
Lateral 350 350 350 350
2 . Connection Charge 400 400 400
400
3 . House Connection 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Total $5 ,650 $4 ,534
$4,450 $4 ,450
Furthermore, the Town Public Works Department plans to overlay
Abbe Road Extension later in this fiscal
if
accepts the recommendation of the W.P.C.A.year to ; the Council fund said sewer
construction on Abbe Road Extension, then this work should be
completed before the road resurfacing work is started in the
Spring of 1989 .
Members of the Town Council
RE : Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 3 .
Sanitary Sewer Design and Project Cost Estimate
In consideration of the aforementioned factors, the W.P .C.A.
pursued the alternative involving sanitary sewer construction.
Several different alternative ways of sewering the area were
considered by the W.P.C.A. ; the alternative selected by the
- W.P.C.A. as the most cost effective alternative is shown in the
attachment labelled "Exhibit E" . This alternative involves a 300
foot extension of the existing sewer within the roadway and will
serve the properties at #331 , #341 , #355 , and #374 . This sewer
extends to the top of the wasteshed in this particular area;
properties to the north of this area will gravity drain toward
the existing sewer on Rosemary Lane.
The Town ' s Public Works Department has estimated the project cost
at $45,350 . Funds collected from sewer assessments will total
$11 ,484; therefore, a source of funding is required • for the
balance of $33,866 .
Very truly yours,
Anthony Palzatano, J`r . , Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority
CFS/jsv
Attachments
4J
x:
X [
W M�. �•y
F 1 1
M +.
a
o
PROJECT LOCATION
N.T.S.
• Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM February 9, 1988
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works and
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 374 Abby Road
The above-referenced property has recently been renovated and
increased in size. There is no record available as to the type and
size of septic system which serves the dwelling.
A septic tank cleaner has indicated that the septic tank is of metal
construction, and is apparently still functioning properly. However,
since use of metal septic tanks was discontinued long ago, this tank
cannot be expected to be functional for much longer, nor can the
leaching area associated with it, if they were both installed at the
same time. The system currently is not failing.
At the request of the propertyowner, I observed a series of deep
observation pits on the property to determine. the feasibility of
installing a new septic system. The majority of these pits con-
tained ledge close enough to existing grade -to preclude a normal
septic system installation. The system, if installed in this area,
would have to be a filled and most likely pumped system.
Several test pits had ledge deep enough to allow a non-filled or
pumped system to be installed. However, it is currently unknown if
this "usable area" is sufficient in size to allow the installation
. of the required amount of leaching area. Additional test pits may
have to be dug to determine ledge grades in this area.
The well serving this dwelling is presently located closer than
seventy-five (75) feet from the septic tank. The location of the
leaching area is unknown. The State Public Health Code does not
currently allow the installation of a septic system within 75 feet
of a well. The "usable area" referred to above is as close as
25 - 35 feet from the existing well. If this area were to be used
for septic system installation, use of the well would have to be
discontinued and a new well drilled.
In summation, although the present septic system is not currently
failing, the limited knowledge about it would indicate that it
cannot be expected to function too much longer. The lot is large
enough to accomodate a new septic system; however, an engineer
design would be needed and the system may have to be filled and
pumped. Also, a new well may have to be drilled to provide proper
separating distances.
Robert Deptula, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
.a
Robe Af b' jo.,n T. Bi//y W. d LeJ//e V. Art/sarL.f!'/Iorirtl. jerl.-sy 1.1f,'LbwoC,.
Levin ton \
�� 7 Fronks P/.min/sy ffo%o nlM
Yo% 478�Hj 34d ( Yb/. 9Q R1.J� ( Vo%486,Rj 2!3
I I Main Level
Z
^� Sill. 245.80 I 1
WMain Loin 11 Rosemary Lane
Level Sill: 249.87 L
evel Sill:
321 331 341 55 A/i` B fTodntr
1
1 Vo% /O.$ og.4B4 S
1 Existing San. fm N292 1 t t
sto.18*15.5 A
TF. 243.55 t\�
rL 232.20 ,j=_ N •
/tt r, _ 1 N I It
Foo•o.,.�— FwYr-� o, 'i�' /00•A..J 1 N /aiO�4ei 1= 1 »•she�1 1.li SO-
1. �—" d twrr►avi
�.,.e.•.��-s. IMse.._vie
le I Is II 20 San.M•1 N!92A
1 S to.21+15.5
iso•a.•-e I I I so.ss•a..i Fss.eo•nw I ( ioo•a..i /9
V
330
to•s...s...,_
,t
n T�_..! ` 364
p Lip Level 374
1 II Sill 2d8.08 Main Level Sill:252.78
B M.N=35 Eler 2a4.46 1 Ali 350 �we4t 1 n/F
Spike in 24 Oak I11 Main Level
J. Kirby G� E/oi//t tf Ho/combe
I II I Si11:245.84 n/F
Yo% S//F Py.34/
`wrm Rob—L"f'e4d'ifrrFdF A01- ck
fl0 Ve% 154 Pp. 2/6
Louisc Tock:ton Tos--,oh J. Jr. C Rhono Az"rm PLAN
V%/ Jao,Pg.SO6 /fNston
Exhibit D
February 29 , 1988
ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWER ALTERNATIVES
FACT SHEET
Objective: Respond to request for sanitary sewer service made by
owner (K. Holcomb) of property at 374 Abbe Road Extension.
Current Status: Existing sanitary sewer on Abbe Road Extension terminate
at a distance of about 300 feet south of said property. A common 6 inch
lateral serves two lots (364 and 350) adjacent to and south of said
property. There is no as-built plan for this lateral, nor is there an
easement in favor of the Town of South Windsor.
Extension of the sewer 300 feet along Abbe Road Extension to reach 374,
would provide service to three other properties in this area.
There is no evidence of a failure of the septic system at 374 Abbe Road
Extention, and the present need to replace the septic tank is to satisfy
a regulatory requirement. (Exhibit A) .
There has been no petition received by the W.P.C.A. from a majority of
the residents in this area requesting an extension of the sewers.
Alternative Sewer Construction
1. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 364 and 350 Abbe Road Extention - lateral
remains private.
2. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 350 and 364 - Town assumes ownership and
maintainance responsibility of lateral.
3. Town installs sewer in road to serve 374 Abbe Road Extension
and three other lots not presently fronting on a sewer (350
and 364 are connected to the sewer and have both been assessed)
Town assumes ownership and maintenance responsibility for line.
4. Town installs sewer off road to serve 374, and three other lots
Town assumes ownership and maintenance for line.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 1 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
Alternative 2 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
*Town unable to clean small
lateral with equipment in
current use.
*Town assumes risk of lateral
maintenance and repair.
• Exhibit D
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative. 3 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47, 696)
suitable capacity.
*Proper design facilitates *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
required.
Alternative 4 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47,949)
suitable capacity
*Proper design facilitites *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
not required.
SEWER ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS - TOWN INSTALLED SEWER
Alternative 3 (In Road) Alternative 4 (Off Road)
a. Construction Costs: ($478696) ($47,949)
b. Funding Sources
i. Sewer Assessments ll,492 11,492
ii. Connection Fees 1 600 1,600
iii. Funding Short Fall 34,604) (�)
Exhibit E
Request for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
/717
d 31 4& 121 e4r
Exhibit F
March 14, 1988
MEMORANDUM
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works/
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: Numbers 331, 341, 355 Abby Road Ext.
A sanitary survey was conducted at the above referenced
Properties- Following are the results:
#331 This property is currently for sales. The
reports that sometimes drainage from the firo
xtures is veryslow, and that sometimes the downstairs toilet must be
flushed twice. If he does not
'le sewer line extended. sell his property, he wants
,
#341 This property presently has a failin se of sewage overflow in rear t • {Area
sewer line extended. Yard) • T g p he tic systesystem-owner wants the
#355 This property owner reports having no his
septic system, and there was no evidence
of faiblems lure. He
wants the sewer line extended.
Al
l
Robert Deptula, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
FUNCTION : ANNUAL REPORT
DEPT: ACTIVITY: Account No:
GENERAL GOVERNMENT BOARDS & COMMISSIONS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTH01129
1989-90 1989-90 1989-90
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 Department Manager Council
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION Actual Adopted Estimated . Request Pro
PERSONAL SERVICES
posed Approved
r' 113 PART TIME SALARIES --- 3,634 -,' ------ 3 400 �----------------------------
3 858 3,400
3,400 3,400
dy ------------------------------------
Sub-Totals PERSONAL SERVICES 3,634 3,858 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400
MATERIALS & EXPENSES
LU
210 OFFICE SUPPLIES
----------------------------------------
Sub-Totals MATERIALS & EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-----------------------------------
° -------200 200------------
310 ADVERTISING 250 197
320 PROFESSIONAL200
330 RENTAL & LEASES
350 PRINTING 26 200 200 200 200 200
371 MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS 100 76 100 100 100
390 OTHER PURCHASE SERVICES
-------------------------------473--------500
Sub-Totals 500
` . CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 26 550 500
CAPITAL OUTLAY ----------------------------
-----------------------------------------
430 CAPITAL PROJECTS 800 800 48 871 441 OFFICE EQUIPMENT r 800 800
Sub- -------- --800
Totals CAPITAL OUTLAY 800 800 48,871 800----
•t
' bEPARTNENT TOTAL 3,660 5,208 4,673 52,771 4,700 4,700
r4 Town of South Windsor Connecticut
E�XHISIT K
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 1, 1989
11 . Communications and Petitions from Council
Mayor Havens asked Town Attorney Ralph Alexander to review
South Windsor's contract with the Connecticut Resource
Recovery Authority (CRRA) in light of the article about the
CRRA which was in the Sunday, April 30th, Hartford Courant.
Mayor Havens read his annual budget statement, attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
Councillor Ryan distributed to the Council a letter
regarding the 89-90 budget, attached Exhibit B.
Mayor Havens explained Exhibit C, entitled "Budget
Appropriation Adjustments 1989/1990" .
Councillor Streeter presented the Council with a letter
regarding the budget, attached Exhibit D and Councillor
Brown also presented a letter, Exhibit E.
12 . Public Participation
Mr. Kirby Holcombe of 374 Abbe Road Extension asked that
the extension of the sewer line to the Abbe Road Extension
area be reinstated in the 1989-90 budget. Mr. Holcombe
explained that the septic systems in that area are failing
or near failure. Mayor Havens explained that this item was
cut by the Town Manager before the budget reached the
Council. Mayor Havens stated that although it was too late
to address in this year's budget, it will be discussed by
the Council at a future work session.
Mr. Barry Guliano stated that he wanted to share his
personal comments, not the Board of Education's, regarding
the 1989-90 budget. He thanked the Council for the
responsible way the cuts to the Board of Education's budget
were handled.
Mr. Fred Doocy of Ellington Road asked that the Council
remember the "over 55" population that lives in South
Windsor. He stated that the constant increase in taxes is
making it prohibitive for retired people, many on limited
income, to live in South Windsor.
Mrs. Honora Futtner of Main Street stated that she felt the
Council should communicate better to each other.
Mr. Jeff Holcombe of expressed wholehearted support for
Councillor Browns suggestion that preliminary monies should
be set aside for a recycling program.
Mr. Frank Neiderwerfer asked that the Council put more
money in this year's budget for land preservation.
2 _
121563
. I.
i
r -2-
I
(D) PARTICIPATION (Items Not On Agenda)
Mr. Bob Brennan of 110 Niederwerfer Road was at the meeting to I
ask the W.P. C.A. to consider letting him hook up to a manhole on
Niederwerfer Road, as his septic system has been failing for
quite some time. Mr. Brennan stated that his system has been
failing ever since the Town installed a storm drain near his
Property.
Mr. Shaw stated that the Town may have an obligation to help
repair the problem, since the Town installed the storm drain, and
it seems it may be contributing to the problem. Mr. Shaw stated
that the Engineering Department and the Town Sanitarian should
look into the situation.
Mrs. Westbrook made a motion to approve Mr. Brennan' s hookup to
the sewers, after checking with the appropriate departments. Mr.
Falzarano Seconded the motion. Motion Unanimously carried.
(E) BILLS, CHANGE ORDERS, DISBURSEMENTS
None
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 . Abbey Road Extension - Proposed Sewer Extension.
Mr. Plumley from 340 Abbey Road Extension attended the meeting to
ask the W.P. C.A. to consider extending the sewers on Abbey Road
Extension. Mr. Plumley has a failing septic system. Mr. Shaw
passed out a packet of information concerning this project. Mr.
Plumley also asked if a member of the W.P. C.A. would attend the
next Town Council Work Session meeting to ask the Town Council to
consider putting the money back into the budget to complete the
extension of the sewers.
G) NEW BUSINESS
1 . Windshire III (RSK-Kellco) for W.F.C.A. approval
Mr. Bruce Kelley submitted an application to finish the last
phase of a resubdivision. This would include 5 new lots and 2
lots off Miller Road.
Mr. Gay Made a motion to accept the proposal subject to approval
from Town technical staff. Mr. Dickinson seconded the motion.
Motion unanimously carried.
i
i
Ex F+1
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR �UlV� `i: low
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 6, 1989
Vice Chairman Carino called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
(A) ROLL CALL
Present Mr. Carino, Mr. Kupchunos, Mrs. Westbrook, Ms.
Fletterick
Absent: Mr. Gay, Mr. Dickinson, Chairman Falzarano
Also Present Mr. Shaw, Councilman Streeter
(B) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
Vice Chairman Carino presented the following minutes for
approval.
1 . May 16, 1989 - Regular Meeting
Mr. Carino made a suggestion to table the approval for the
minutes to a later date, until he had a chance to read them
through. Mr. Kupchunos agreed.
1 C) COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
I . Superintendent of Pollution Control
Mr. Shaw stated that on June 26 the Town Council will discuss
Abbe Road Extension, concerning the budget cut for sanitary
sewers in that area.
Also he had further information concerning Mr. Brennan' s property
on Niederwerfer Road. Mr. Shaw met with Mr. Davies in the
Engineering Department. , and Mr. Deptula, the Town Sanitarian.
They looked for ways to solve the problem in the most cost
effecient way. He will notify the Commision as to the outcome of
that meeting at a later date.
2. Council Liaison
Mr. Streeter was present at this meeting, and he stated that he
and the mayor were concerned with possible expenditures with a
hookup, and they want any and all information as to if the Town
has any obligation to repair this matter, and if so what is the
time table.
to4N SC,(
.4 • F �� 0
9 w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
SOR•co � AREA CODE 203/644-2511
June 19, 1989
Members of the Town Council
South Windsor Town Hall
1540' Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Councillors:
RE: Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
The Water Pollution Control Authority (W.P.C.A. ) requests Town
Council consideration to fund a project to extend sewers on Abbe
Road Extension. This project involves the construction of
approximately 300 feet of gravity sanitary sewer that will serve
four residential units . (Exhibit A, attached)
This project is in response to a petition requesting sewer
service signed by all the property owners; and the W.P.C.A. has
determined by survey results that there is a need for sanitary
sewers in this area.
Background
J - i
The first request for sewers in this area was made by the
property owner at 374 Abbe Road Extension. A septic system
inspection completed by the Towns Environmental Health Officer
(Exhibit B, attached) indicated that while the existing septic
system had not yet failed, there were signs that the system was
near the end of its useful life, and that a costly replacement of
.the septic system would be required.
The W.P.C.A. investigated alternative methods of assisting this
property owner, which included this use of an existing lateral
currently serving the properties - #364 and #350 (Exhibit C,
attached) ; it was concluded that a Town sewer was the most
feasible alternative (Exhibit D, attached) .
This property owner was informed as to the W.P.C.A. requirement
that a request for sanitary sewer service must include a petition
for such services signed by a majority of the affected property
. owners . A petition was subsequently submitted to the W.P.C.A.
(Exhibit E, attached) , and included three additional properties .
CK (T �J
Members of the Town Council
RE: Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 2 .
The Environmental Health Officer was requested by the W.P.C.A. to
conduct a sanitary survey, the results of which indicated that at
least one system was in the processing of failing (Exhibit F,
attached)
The lots in this area are without city water service and
therefore depend upon wells for potable water. The lots are not
large, and because of the need for wells and other evidence
suggesting the presence of ledge and a high ground water table,
there are limited opportunities for installation of new septic
systems. Because of these factors, the W.P.C.A. considered
sewers to be the most reliable alternative to protect the public
health in this area.
Cost Analysis
The W.P.C.A. considered the sewer avoidance costs of septic tank
replacements in this area where there was ledge, limited- lot size
(AA30) , and no city water, and it- was determined that such costs
for each property owner would be in the range of between $8,000
and $10,000.
The cost to the property owners for sanitary sewers were
calculated as follows:
#374 #355 #341 #331
1. Sewer Assessment
Base Charge $1,200 $11,200 $1,200 $1,200
Frontage 4,000 2,140 2,000 2,000
Lateral 600 600 600 600
2 . Connection Charge 600 600 600 600
3 . House Connection 1,500 11500 11500 1,500
Total $7, 900 $6,040
$5,900 $5,900
Furthermore, the Town Public Works Department plans to overlay
Abbe Road Extension later in this fiscal year; if the Council
accepts the recommendation of the W.P.C.A. to fund said sewer
construction on Abbe Road Extension, then this work should be
completed before the road resurfacing work is started in the
Spring of 1989 .
Ex14isIr
Members of the Town Council
RE: Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 3 .
Sanitary Sewer Design and Pro ect Cost Estimate
In consideration of the aforementioned factors, the W.P.C.A.
pursued the alternative involving sanitary sewer construction.
Several different alternative ways of sewering the area were
considered by the W.P.C.A. ; the alternative selected by the
W.P.C.A. as the most cost effective alternative is shown in the
attachment labelled "Exhibit E" . This alternative involves a 300
foot extension of the existing sewer within the roadway and will
serve the properties at #331, #341, #355, and #374. This sewer
extends to the top of the wasteshed in this particular area;
properties to the north of this area will gravity drain toward
the existing sewer on Rosemary Lane.
The Towns Public Works Department has estimated the project cost
at $48,871 . Funds collected from sewer assessments will total
$17,340; therefore, a source of funding is required for the
balance of $31,531 .
Very truly yours,
Anthony Falzarano, Jr. , Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority
CFS/jsv
Attachments
o
1
s
� � w
•
w
PROJECT LOCATION
N.T.S.
Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM February 9, 1988
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works and
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 374 Abby Road
The above-referenced property has recently been renovated and
increased in size. There is no record available as to the type and
size of septic system which serves the dwelling.
A septic tank cleaner has indicated that the septic tank is of metal
construction, and is apparently still functioning properly. However,
since use of metal septic tanks was discontinued long ago, this tank
cannot be expected to be functional for much longer, nor can the
leaching area associated with it, if they were both installed at the
same time. The system currently is not failing.
At the request of the propertyowner, I observed a series of deep
observation pits on the property to determine the feasibility of
installing a new septic system. The majority of these pits con-
tained ledge close enough to existing grade -to preclude a normal
septic system installation. The system, if installed in this area,
would have to be a filled and most likely pumped system.
Several test pits had ledge deep enough to allow a non-filled or
pumped system to be installed. However, it is currently unknown if
this "usable area" is sufficient in size to allow the installation
of the required amount of leaching area. Additional test pits may
have to be dug to determine ledge grades in this area.
The well serving this dwelling is presently located closer than
seventy-five (75) feet from the septic tank. The location of the
leaching area is unknown. The State Public Health Code does not
currently allow the installation of a septic system within 75 feet
of a well. The "usable area" referred to above is as close as
25 - 35 feet from the existing well. If this area were to be used
for septic system installation, use of the well would have to be
discontinued and a new well drilled.
In summation, although the present septic system is not currently
failing, the limited knowledge about it would indicate that it
cannot be expected to function too much longer. The lot is large
enough to accomodate a new septic system; however, an engineer
design would be needed and the system may have to be filled and
pumped. Also, a new well may have to be drilled to provide proper
separating distances.
Robert Deptu1a, 'R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
Robert M.-e Joers T. pi//y W.Z/Les/ie V. Arthvrl.f//Horii-tl. .kf%'ray 1✓f,'gswnC�.
4.1 Lerinton Fionks P/am/ay I Ho%ombc \
1 Yo% 9B, fig. /B Yo/ 478,Ry. $18 I yo% m, Yo%486,fg 2/9
r I 1 Main Level 1 1
Sill 245.80 1 1
Main Main
W 11 Rosemary Level Sill: 249.87 Level Si11.24f1.09 Y Lane
321 331 341 355
1 A/ice B. Rodner•
1 _ Yo/ /03, f'g.4B4 d
1 Existing San.mi N:92 1 1 t
1
eta.18+15.5 lot
TF. 243.55
rl. 232.20
ArIV
11 d
.oe_w.. ss..si•
r.rr+. 1
nrJtr..P.j�
is 1e II 20 San.NH N2 92A
Sto.21+15.5
Itoo•as I I r
III I,e I �
I �lr
L'6 Ah.
II �rt F.......�[.� I �•c. 1 1
330r�-•--
10•S—s.....
is
364
Main Level 374
1 II Sill•248.08 Main Level Sill:232.78
B.M.N°35 Elev. 244.46 1 350 1
�wE[c I n/f Spike in 24"0ok I II Main Level I .T. Kirby fi E/o//7e K. Ho%rube II Sill:245.84 n/F
�wcec Robert AG'6srtr[/de OensAic*
,'ouise .Tockst'on Joseph J. J,: g'Rh000 Morc%
!ra/. Soo.Pg-Spb KrYston PLAN
Vol 932,
Exhibit D
February 29 , 1988
ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - SANITARY SEWER ALTERNATIVES
FACT SHEET
Objective: Respond to request for sanitary sewer service made by
owner (K. Holcomb) of property at 374 Abbe Road Extension.
Current Status: Existing sanitary sewer on Abbe Road Extension terminates
at a distance of about 300 feet south of said property. A common 6 inch
lateral serves two lots (364 and 350) adjacent to and south of said
property. There is no as-built plan for this lateral, nor is there an
easement in favor of the Town of South Windsor.
Extension of the sewer 300 feet along Abbe Road Extension to reach 374,
would provide service to three other properties in this area.
There is no evidence of a failure of the septic system at 374 Abbe Road
Extention, and the present need to replace the septic tank is to satisfy
a regulatory requirement. (Exhibit A) .
There has been no petition received by the W.P.C.A. from a majority of
the residents in this area requesting an extension of the sewers.
Alternative Sewer Construction
1. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 364 and 350 Abbe Road Extention - lateral
remains private.
2. Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 350 and 364 - Town assumes ownership and
maintainance responsibility of lateral.
3. Town installs sewer in road to serve 374 Abbe Road Extension
and three other lots not presently fronting on a sewer (350
and 364 are connected to the sewer and have both been assessed) ;
Town assumes ownership and maintenance responsibility for line.
4. Town installs sewer off road to serve 374, and three other lots;
Town assumes ownership and maintenance for line.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 1 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
Alternative 2 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertain.
*Need for easement agreement.
*Town unable to clean small
lateral with equipment in
current use.
*Town assumes risk of lateral
maintenance and repair.
Exhibit D
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 3 - *Proper design provides *High cost ($47, 696)
suitable capacity.
*Proper design facilitates *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
required.
Alternative 4 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47,949)
suitable capacity
*Proper design facilitites *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users)
*Easement agreement
not required.
SEWER ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS - TOWN INSTALLED SEWER
Alternative 3 (In Road) Alternative 4 (Off Road)
a. Construction Costs: ($47,696) ($47,949)
b. Funding Sources
i. Sewer Assessments 11,492 11,492
ii. Connection Fees 1, 600 1,600
iii. Funding Short Fall 934,604)
r
Exhibit E
Request .for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
��. xT
All,
led ,6- -4\i
e /� ��� �
l� �� 3 31
Exhibit F
March 141 ' 1988
MEMORANDUM
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works/
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: Numbers 331, 341, 355 Abby Road Ext.
A sanitary survey was conducted at the above referenced
properties. Following are the results:
#331 This property is currently for sales. The property owner
reports that sometimes drainage from the fixtures is very
slow, and that sometimes the downstairs toilet must be
flushed twice. If he does not sell his property, he wants
the sewer line extended.
#341 This property presently has a failing septic system. (Area
of sewage overflow in rear yard) . - The owner wants the
sewer line extended.
#355 This property owner reports having no problems with his
septic system, and there was no evidence of failure. He
wants the sewer line extended.
Robert DeptulAf R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
r
ExiiisIT' 0
',ItltRt 2 R 2���
MINUTES
TOWN COUNCIL
MADDEN ROOM WORK SESSION
SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN HALL JUNE 26, 1989
TIME: 7:45 P.M.
1 . Call meeting to order
Mayor Havens called the meeting to order at 7:45 P.M.
2. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Havens
Deputy Mayor Kupchunos
Councillor Brown
Councillor Kerensky
Councillor Mitchell
Councillor Moynihan
Councillor Ryan
Councillor Sagese
Councillor Streeter
3 . Public Participation
L Mr. Kirby Holcombe of Abbe Road Extension asked that the
Council consider extending the sewer line to four houses C
on his road. Mr. Holcombe stated that the Water
Pollution Control Authority was petitioned last year and
passed a resolution recommending that this extension be
budgeted for in 1989-90 . Mayor Havens stated that money
to fund the sewer extension had been cut from the 1989-90
budget by Town Manager Richard Sartor before it reached
the Council. Acting Town Manager Jean Zurbrigen
explained that Mr. Holcombe's septic system was found to
be "not up to today's standards" , due to its proximity to
Mr. Holcombe's well, when he did remodeling in his home
which required a Certificate of Occupancy be signed off
by the Town. Mr. Holcombe's system is not presently in
failure. Mr. Arthur Plumley, also of Abbe Road
Extension, asked to speak to the Council about the
extension of the sewers. He stated that his septic
system has failed and urged the Council to extend the
sewer line to help his situation. Ms. Zurbrigen
explained that Mr. Plumley's system was approximately 10
years old and that a swimming pool had been installed in
the area of the leaching fields. Mayor Havens stated
that he knew of other failed septic systems and
questioned how extending sewers for only one area could
be justified. Mr. Holcombe stated that the Water
121KC3
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 26, 1989
WORK SESSION
3 . Continued
Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) has stated that it
will be rediscussing the Abbe Road Extension problem at a
future WPCA meeting. Councillor Kerensky asked that the
WPCA be contacted and put on a Council agenda for
discussion.
4 . Communications
Deputy Mayor Kupchunos asked whether the Nevers Road Park
could be sprayed for mosquitoes, especially when there
are concerts planned at the park. Acting Town Manager
Jean Zurbrigen replied that spraying can be done if the
Town Council wishes, however, spraying has not been
popular in the past with residents . It was decided that
people attending the concerts can bring their own
mosquito repellant.
The Deputy Mayor asked whether town land on Nevers Road
had been rented for agricultural purposes. Ms. Zurbrigen
said she would check into the rental. The Deputy Mayor
also stated that he would like the Council to send a
message to South Windsor residents that South Windsor
does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision on flag
burning. He suggested that the Town make American Flags
available to town residents at cost. There was
discussion about other possible ways of showing South
Windsor's support for the flag and it was decided that
the Patriotic Commission, with Council involvement,
should come up with some ideas on this matter.
5 . Town Manager's Report
Acting Town Manager Jean Zurbrigen reported that the
CRCOG Housing Compact was endorsed by all twenty-nine
towns in the region. Ms. Zurbrigen also reported that
she, Councillor Brown and Assistant Director of Public
Works Fred Shaw attended the recycling meeting at CRCOG
on Friday, June 23rd. Ms. Zurbrigen and Councillor Brown
both stated that they were left with the impression that
CRRA may become involved in the regional recycling
process . It was the Council's consensus that action
needs to be taken on a recycling plan in the near future.
Ms . Zurbrigen went on to report that the CRCOG Policy
Board approved the list of transportation projects as
anticipated.
- 2 - 12 16%3 4
r.
r
MEMORANDUM September 5, 1989
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works (&)
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 341 Abby Road Extension
On Friday September 1, 1989, the property-owner excavated the
distribution box of his septic system as suggested in this
Department's letter to him dated 8-17-89 (copy enclosed) .
This distribution box was not tipped or dislodged as had been
theorized and therefore is not the causative factor of the
failing septic system.
The distribution box was observed to be full to overflowing with
effluent (above the top of the outlets) from the septic tank,
indicating that the two existing drywells are no longer capable
of absorbing effluent as quickly as it is discharged to them,
thus leading to system failure.
Solid material from the septic tank was also observed in the
distribution box. Solids should be retained in the septic tank
by means of a baffle at the outlet end. The property owner
indicated that he recalled the septic tank baffle being broken
but he could not recall if it had been repaired.
If it was not repaired, solids could have entered the leaching
areas (two existing dry wells) and clogged them, thus preventing
leachate from being absorbed.
It is currently unknown if indeed this is the situation.
Excavation of the dry wells could determine if this is the
situation or if they are naturally no longer capable of
functioning.
The property-owner was informed by this department that this
further exploration may or may not produce positive results and
could be done or not, at his discretion.
Whatever the cause, the system is presently not functioning
properly and does indeed have periods where effluent does surface
on top of the ground.
Robert Deptula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
C t� s1 ; �•
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDS.OR, CONN. 06074
,OS.7 R-- AREA CODE 203/644-2511
September 14 , 1988
Members of the Town Council
South Windsor Town Hall
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor , CT 06074
Dear Councillors :
RE : Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
The Water Pollution Control Authority (W.P .C. A . ) requests Town
Council consideration to fund a project to extend sewers on Abbe
Road Extension . This project involves the construction of
approximately 300 feet of gravity sanitary sewer that will serve
J. residential units . ( Exhibit A, attached)
This project is in response to a petition requesting sewer
service signed by all the property owners ; and the N. P . C. A . has
determined by survey results that there is a need for sanitary
sewers in this area .
Background
The first request for sewers in this area was made by the
property owner at 374 Abbe Road Extension , A septic system
inspection completed by the Town ' s Environmental Health Officer
(Exhibit B, attached) indicated that while the existing septic
system had not yet failed , there were signs that the system was
near the end of its useful life , and that a costly replacement of
the septic system would be required .
The W.P .C.A . investigated alternative methods of assisting this
property owner , which included this use of an existing lateral
currently serving the properties - 7#364 and 4350 ( Exhibit C,
attached) ; it was concluded that a Town sewer was the most
feasible alternative (Exhibit D , attached ) ,
This propert.�CT owner was informed as to the W.P , C.A. requirement
that a request for sanitary sewer service must include a petition
for such services signed by a majority of the affected property
oWne1S . A petition Wi Ss subseruen tly submitted to the W.U , C. 1%. ,
(Exhibit E , attached) , and included three additional properties ,
Members of the Town Council
RE : Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 2 .
The Environmental Health Officer was requested by the W.P . C.A. to
conduct a sanitary survey, the results of which indicated that at
least one system was in the processing of failing ( Exhibit F,
attached)
The lots in this area are without city water service and
therefore depend upon wells for potable water . The lots are not
large, and because of the need for wells and other evidence
suggesting the presence of ledge and a high ground water table ,
there are limited opportunities for installation of new septic
systems . Because of these factors , the W.P .C .A. considered
sewers to be the most reliable alternative to protect the public
health in this area .
Cost Analysis
The W.P.C.A . considered the sewer avoidance costs of septic tank
replacements in this area where there was ledge , limited lot size
(AA30) , and no city water , and it was determined that such costs
for each property owner would be in the range of between $6 ,000
and $8 , 000 .
The cost to the property owners for sanitary sewers were
calculated as follows :
#374 #355 #341 #331
1 . Sewer Assessment
Base Charge_ $1 , 000 $1 , 000 $1 , 000 $1 , 000
Frontage 2 , 400 1 , 284 1 , 200 1 , 200
Lateral 350 350 350 350
2 . Connection Charge 400 400 400 400
3 . House Connection 1 , 500 1 , 500 1 , 500 1 , 500
Total $5 , 650 $4 , 534 $4 , 450 $4 ,450
Furthermore, the Town Public Works Department plans to overlay
Abbe Road Extension later in this fiscal year ; if the Council
accepts the recommendation of the W.P .C.A. to fund said sewer
construction on Abbe Road Extension, then this work should be
completed before the road resurfacing work is started in the
Spring of 1989 .
t
Members of the Town Council
RE : Abbe Road Extension - Sanitary Sewer Petition
Page 3 .
Sanitary Sewer Design and Project Cost Estimate
In consideration of the aforementioned factors, the W.P . C. A .
pursued the alternative involving sanitary sewer construction .
Several different alternative ways of seweri.ng the area were
considered by the W.P .C.A. ; the alternative selected by the
W.P . C.A . as the most cost effective alternative is shown in the
attachment labelled "Exhibit E" . This alternative involves a 300
foot extension of the existing sewer within the roadway and will
serve the properties at #331 , #341 , #355 , and #374 . This sewer
extends to the top of the wasteshed in this particular area;
properties 'to the north of this area will gravity drain toward
the existing sewer on Rosemary Lane.
The Town ' s Public Works Department has estimated the project cost
at $45 ,350 . Funds collected from sewer assessments will total
$11 , 484 ; therefore, a source of funding is required for the
balance of $33 , 866 .
Very truly yours,
Anthony FalzaEano, Jz . , Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority
CFS/jsv
Attachments
♦P
T y10 t
PROJECT LOCATION
N.TS.
i
Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM February 9, 1988
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works and
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 374 Abby Road
The above-referenced property has recently been renovated and
increased in size . There is no record available as to the type and
size of septic system which serves the dwelling.
A septic tank cleaner has indicated that the septic tank is of metal
construction, and is apparently still functioning properly. However,
since use of metal septic tanks was discontinued long ago, this tank
cannot be expected to be functional for much longer, nor can the
leaching area associated with it, if they were both installed at the
same time. The system currently is not failing.
At the request of the propertyowner, I observed a series of deep
observation pits on the property to determine. the feasibility of
installing a new septic system. The majority of these pits con-
tained ledge close enough to existing grade to preclude a normal
septic system installation. The system, if installed in this area,
would have to be a filled and most likely pumped system.
Several test pits had ledge deep enough to allow a non-filled or
pumped system to be installed. However, it is currently unknown if
this "usable area" is sufficient in size to allow the installation
of the required amount of leaching area. Additional test pits may
have to be dug -to determine ledge grades in this area.
The well serving this dwelling is presently located closer than
seventy-five (75) feet from the septic tank. The location of the
leaching area is unknown. The State Public Health Code does not
currently allow the installation of a septic system within 75 feet
of a well . The "usable area referred to above is as close as
25 - 35 feet from the existing well. If this area were to be used
for septic system installation, use of the well would have to be
discontinued and a new well drilled.
In summation, although the present septic system is not currently
failing, the limited knowledge about it would indicate that it
cannot be expected to function too much longer. Ths lot is large
enough to accomodate a new-septic system; however, an engineer
design would be needed and the system may have to be filled and
pumped. Also , a new well may have to be drilled to provide proper
separating distances .
Robert Dept a, R. C .
Environmental Health Officer
U n/f n/f
Robert //6 Joan 7." Bi/iy W .16 Lcs/ic V. AifhurL.f, Ho�iell jcF,fney W. 4'49<7W17 Cs.
yJ �on FO/' /7A-s Plum/c
LeviF� Yo% 47®�Pg. 34,9 I I Yo% 9,5, .59j Yo -a86,17.2i9
�-{ I Main Level
Sill 24'5.80
i;
� Main Main
Level Sill: 249.87 �Sill:24�9.09 II Rosemary tans
321 331 341 n/F
t A/icc B. Roanai
" i g Row e.>:_'.. , t
I Existing San. N+i N'92 I ( + t
sva,18 5 11
. 243.3.55
,� !I
U232.20
p,� a II
i oo•ow., o .,.
'��so �d 1 ioo•O,•,d , II ioo•o,.es I'�ci I
I{� .t'S.•'a f./J�AYI -���_-1_^Y'r'IL>/
—E�v.,e•ny n'Jo —�cI iMSL..-.P.'Pw — _.______ �_.-�.
_ e _I 9 1� Za San. W N2 92A
Sta. 21+15.5
II .v I /60.7 7"Ows./ —.—
.SOO'q.wd
II �v
330
II E.w r w 364 ,J-
q >•_� 1t
Main Level
374
1 II Sill:248.08 Mai;, Levr;l Sill:252.78
B.M.N°35 Elev: 244.46 1 o II 350 I
C wcrt 4 ` 12
Spike in 24"Ook I t II Main Level
I I T- y r;' E///, L( Ho/cam,G�
Sill: 245.84 n/F S//, Vy• 3.¢/
�wc« /?obanf f 6 CjeF frudc Ocnshiclr
L ouisc ,rock stop Pg. '�/�
.TosePh J. Ti. �'Rhona /7oic/c pL AN
Ya/, Soo•Py,S06 K�/sC`on
ExhlblL D
February 29 , 1988
ABBE ROAD EXTENSION - ;S-ANITARY SEWER ALTERNATIVES
FACT SHEET
Objective: Respond to request for :unitary sewer service made by
owner (K. Holcomb) of property at 374 Abbe Road Extension.
Current Status : Existing sanitary sewer on Abbe Road Extension terminal
at a distance of about 300 feet south of said property. A common 6 inc.
lateral serves two lots (364 and 350 ) adjacent to and south of said
property. There is no as-built plan for this lateral, nor is there an
easement in favor of the Town of South Windsor.
Extension of the sewer 300 feet along Abbe Road Extension to reach 374 ;
would provide service to three other properties in this area.
There is no evidence of a failure of the septic system at 374 Abbe Road
Extention, and the present need to replace the septic tank is to satisf--
a regulatory requirement. (Exhibit A) .
There has been no petition received by the W.P.C.A. from a majority of
the residents in this area requesting an extension of the sewers .
Alternative Sewer Construction
1 . Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 364 and 350 Abbe Road Extention - lateral
remains private.
2 . Permit connection of 374 Abbe Road Extention to existing
lateral serving 350 and 364 - Town assumes ownership and
maintainance responsibility of lateral.
3 . Town installs sewer in road to serve 374 Abbe Road Extension
and three other lots not presently fronting on a sewer (350
and 364 are connected to the sewer and have both been assesses:
Town assumes ownership and maintenance responsibility for li_=
4 . Town installs sewer off road to serve 374 , and three other lc--
Town assumes ownership and maintenance for line.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 1 * lower cost - ---- *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncertai.:•.
*Need for easement agreement.
Alternative 2 * lower cost *Without as-built plan,
capacity of lateral uncerta-in
*Need for easement agreement.
*Town unable to clean small
lateral with equipment in
current use.
*Town assumes risk of lateral
maintenance and repair.
�71sD L L D
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 3 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47 , 696 )
suitable capacity.
*Proper design facilitates *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users )
*Easement agreement
required.
Alternative 4 *Proper design provides *High cost ($47 ,949 )
suitable capacity
*Proper design facilitates *Limited service area
line maintenance (4 users )
*Easement agreement
_ not required.
SEWER ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS - TOWN INSTALLED SEWER
Alternative 3 (In Road) Alternative 4 (Off Road)
a. Construction Costs : ($47, 696 ) ($47, 949 )
b. Funding Sources
i . Sewer Assessments 11, 492 11, 492
ii. Connection Fees 1 , 600 1 , 600
iii. Funding Short Fall 034 , 604 ) ( 34 , 857)
EX11iI)it E
Request .for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext, South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
v
M
Exhibit F
March 14 , 1983
MEMORANDUM
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director
of Public Works/
Superintendent of pollution
trol
Re: Numbers 331, 341, 355 Abby Road Ext.
A sanitary survey was conducted at the above referenced
properties . Following are the results :
#331 This property is currently for sales . The property owner
reports that sometimes drsinage f' ^"' the fixtures is very
slow, and that sometimes the downstairs toilet must be
flushed twice. If he does not sell his property, he wants
the sewer line extended.
#341 This property presently has a failing septic system. (Area
of sewage overflow in rear yard) . " The owner wants the
sewer line extended.
ms with
#35 This property owner thererts washnoleg no idenPeoofefailure.h1He
septic system,
wants the sewer line extended.
Robert DeptulA, R.S .
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
4
N HOUSE
(IDEA r )
I A�)' 4
DRY�dC
v Xr.
NOTES SOUTH WINDSOR POLLUTION CONTROL
LOCATION 3 4 1 A BB Y R0/-\D
OWNER PLUM L E Y
TYPE OF WORK TEPT(C sys Tc M RE-PAIR,
DATE 8 1a 78 PERMIT PIPE
INSTALLER
INSPECTOR 8. D. DRAWN BY S L.
Department of Pollution Control_
SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
DRAIN LAYER'S PERMIT u -)Ir'-
Application for Permit to Install or , .epa Individual Sewage Disposal System
Fee Paid $.../0.2.. .................... By ............���....k.V.E.N.................. ..01A.-ST-................................................... Permit No. ......7 ..",��.v`^.......,.
Date ............$.-.9..:... : ............:.....................
Pursuant to written application, permission is hereby granted to the Licensed. Drain Layer named herein
for repair ......... or construction ......... of an individual sewage disposal system concerning which the following
information is submitted:
1. Owner of Property ..........................P '"..f y.............................................. Address of Owner .....!4!/......... y....... . . ...................................
2. Location of Property ........ Y�..................A5.51..............�22 ......................................................................... Lot No. ..............................
3. Type of Structure ........................ Et-..j .��e..................................................................................................
(Dwelling, Commercial Building, Store, etc.)
4. Number of Families or Persons to Occupy Premises ............Q..Nf.........f .t�/.y.....................................................................................................
5. Number of Bedrooms ................................................
6. Average Daily Flow ................................................... -
Manufacturer and
7. Liquid Capacity of Septic Tank .........................................................
............................ Material of Septic Tank ..........................................................................................
S. Soil Conditions: Type of Soil ................................
(Sand, Gravel, Clay, etc.)
Maximum ground water table ..............,..................................................... ..
9. If not served by public water supply:
Distance from Owner's well ........................................................................
Fromadjacent wells ............................................................................................
10. Distance to nearest water course, drainage ditch, storm drain or embankment .............................................................
11. ..........................
Percolation Tests: Time for 1" drop in soil test ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Classificationof soil .............................................................................................................. ........................
12.
Minimum square feet of effective seepage area required .....................
.................................
............. ............................W....... .......................................................
3. Leaching System: Number of trenches ............. ................................. Length ................................ ....
.................... idth... ...................................................
Total ................................................ Other ............................................................................:...............
14.
Plot Plan Attached. ...............................................................
15. Layout Approved. .........................................
16. This permit expires ..................................................................................
Signature .................... G�. Z�1
............................... ..........................................
(Licensed Drain Layer)
Installation Completed, Inspected and Approved in accordance with State Public Health Code and Local Ordinances
.......................................................................................................b....':......1.......... 19.:.7.4...... By
Pollution Problem abated Date ................................:...........
........... ...... .. �......................................_.I.............
✓1Lv�, �, .s -46 Inspector
P
♦ 10AN 9F,( -
O U
w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
�N4soR.co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
August 17 , 1989
Mr. Arthur Plumley
341 Abby Road Ext.
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Plumley,
As we have discussed, due to the physical flow pattern within a
septic system (from the dwelling to the septic tank which retains
solids, to the distribution box which disperses effluent equally
to the leaching areas) it may be possible that an adjustment(s)
of the distribution box may solve the septic system problem.
As indicated above, the purpose of the distribution box is to
equally distribute liquid to the respective leaching areas . If,
during the process of backfilling the system, or if because of
settlement after construction, the distribution box became
tipped, equal distribution may not be occurring within the
system. Therefore, in this particular case, one of two drywells
(leaching areas ) may be receiving all of the effluent from the
dwelling, thereby causing premature failure of this one leaching
area, with the other dry well not receiving any effluent.
To determine if this has happened, the distribution box would
have to be excavated. This is a fairly simple process which can
easily be accomplished within one hours time by using a hand .
shovel. Once the distribution box is excavated the cover would
be removed and the flow of leachate from it would be observed.
If indeed, all effluent was flowing to one leaching area,
adjustments would be made to equalize the flow. As a worse case
situation, the distribution box may have to be replaced. This
can also be accomplished by use of only a hand shovel, probably
within several hours time.
This department would be eager to provide Technical assistance to
you if you so desire. If you have any questions or if I can be
of further assistance, please contact me at the South Windsor
Town Hall 644-2511 extension 248 .
Robert Dep ula, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
Cc:. C.F. Shaw Superintendant of Pollution Control/Assistant
Director of Public Works
FEE
TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT Application No.
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Date 8
I hereby apply for permit tobuild a sewage disposal system for a
/I,C S;je 440 p-
(Residence , tc.)
Owned by C I I ao I s�/'C e-r of
And located atc�
To be built by �I1�T 0 1-d VJ. �/ C e-r of FA r/n b-7 lye -A
in accordance with detailed information stated below.
Signed
( �pl'cant)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GENERAL INFORMATION
1 . Estimated population of premises (present)_ (future)
2. Description of premises (including number of bedrooms)
No. Fixtures
(Above basement): Water Closets �y Urinals Lavatories
Bath tubs Showers Kitchen Sinks Laundry Tubs /
Garbage Grinder List basement fixtures
3. Water Supply Kind of Well
(R4b4e-, well, ng , _._t_rn) /
Location of well and underground water piping 7-5 -
Method of obtaining or storing supply jo /Y
W , tank, ete:)
4. Character of soil at proposed location of leaching system, including depths of
various strata T7,� ��I�
ay , hardpan, rze —11se test pits.)
5. Elevation of highest ground water
(with reference to both present & future grade)
x �3 k' k 'sue nc- 7•
Ad
zp
`C
'Q �1� ��_ '[• `��-' 4 ' - irk:
a
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
REGULAR MEETING
February 20, 1990
Commissioner Joseph Carino called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
(A) ROLL CALL
.Absent: William Gay
Present: J. Carino, A. Falzarano, C. Fletterick, C. Westbrook,
R. Dickinson, J. Kupchunos.
Also Present: Fred Shaw
(B) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the meeting of Tuesday, February 6, .1990 were
accepted on motion of R. Dickinson, seconded by C. Fletterick, and
a unanimous vote.
(C) COMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTS
1. Superintendent of Water Pollution Authority
Mr. Shaw said he had received a letter of resignation from
William Gay.
He also had received letters approving the appointment to W.P.C.A.
of Robert Dickinson and Anthony Falzarano.
2. Council Liaison
None
3. Commissioners
None
4. Other Agencies
None
(D) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Item Not On Agenda)
None
(E) BILLS, CHANGE—ORDERS DISBURSEMENTS
None
(F) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. . Abbe Road Extension (Mr.. Plumley, 341 Abbe Rd. , Extn.)
Engineering Report
After much- discussion concerning the ongoing sewer problems on
Abbe Road Extension, the W.P.C.A. voted to recommend to the Town
Council that a segment of sewer lines be installed on Abbe Road
Extension.
Mr. Shaw pointed out that the designed sub-surface disposal sewer was a
feasible alternative to sewers. Both Mr. Shaw and Bob Deputal , town sani-
tarian felt that the sub-surface disposal system was a practical and feasi-
ble alternative and Mr. Deptula felt that on-site repairs were possible, but
noted that no guarantee as to length of time it would be serviceable could be
set.
The Commission , considered that the area had health problems. There was also
the possibility of obtaining waivers from the town sanitarian and/or State
Health Department which, if granted, could make onsite repairs feasible. It wa
noted that the state requires a reserve area equal in size i.e. if there is a
6O' by 40' leeching trench, there would have to be the same size piece of land
in reserve in case the original trench failed. It was determined that a sewer
system affords long term service and -that the property owners in the Abbe Road
Extension area had waited long enough.
Mr. Carino noted that if an alternative plan was -implemented, the property
owners could be back to the Commission within five years - or it could last
20 years.
He felt that before approaching the Town, Council , it would have to be determia---
just what the cost factor is, the health problems, and have a petition form th_
property owners.
After polling the Commissioners, it was unanimously voted that the W.P.C.A.
should go to the Town Council ,to request that a segment of sewer lines be
installed on Abbe Road Extension.
2. South Windsor/Manchester Sewer Agreement
Mr. Carino asked Mr. Shaw to provide a map of the area to be effected
by the sewer agreement indicating just where the pipe lines would go
in order to accommodate Manchester. He said that South Windsor had
agreed to accept X number of gallons of sewerage into its system and
said if it is necessary to modify the town's system to accommodate
Mancheter, Manchester should have to share the cost.
3. Budget Discussion
It was voted that the proposed cost of the Abbe Road Extension sewer
system be included in the budget for the Fiscal Year 1990-91, in the
amount of -approximately $50,000 for. a 300-linear foot gravity sewer.
(G) NEW BUSINESS
1. Election of Officers
Joseph Carino was elected chairman of W.P.C.A. for a two year term;
Anthony Falzarano, vice chairman; and Robert Dickinson, secretary.
-2-
(H) MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING CLAIMS
None
(I) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 P.M. on motion made by C. Fletterick,
seconded by J. Carino, and unanimously accepted.
Betty r, C1 e
-3-
S CwN 8f,
O E+
7own o-,,PS-otdA ?And4at
9 C� 1540 SUL.LIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
R-co AREA CODE 203/644-2511
February 16, 1990
Mr. Emil W. Lucek
Lucek Engineering Associates, Inc.
490 Buckland Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Lucek:
This letter will serve to confirm this departments comments
regarding your report to the Water Pollution Control
Authority regarding the request for sanitary
Extension. sewer service
Of J. Kirby Holcombe and Arthur Plumley, Abby Road
Reasons for request:
Even though the septic systems may not conform to
current standards, they would not be considered as
violations since they are existing conditions, except
for 374 Abby Road Extension which required the
issuance of a C.O. which mandates compliance with all
codes.
The Hartford County soil survey accurately delineates
soil types by area. However, it is necessary to dig
deep test pits in the exact area that the system will
go in, for verification of soil type.
Alternatives to Sanitary Sewer Request:
374 Abby Road Extension
Lucek Engineering has indicated that a seption tank
cleaner has stated the tank is approximately 1000
gallons.
The size of the leaching area is unknown. However,
if it is the original installation, it is most
likely undersized.
If a new septic system were installed on this
property it would most likely have to be filled,
necessitating a pump to elevate above ledge,
however, additional test pits may indicate a
suitable area without fill.
+l
Mr. Emil W. Lucek
Page 2
February 6, 1990
The well may also have to be moved. However, if
the system has to be pumped anyway, it can be
located far enough away from the existing well.
The purpose of a filled septic design is to raise
the system above ledge to meet code requirements.
A reserve area would not be required for a repair.
.341 Abby Road Extension
At this point, since no deep test pits were dug,
the separating distance between dry well bottom and
ledge is only assumed.
A new baffle could be installed in the septic tank.
The existing septic tank would not have to be
replaced unless it was deteriorating.
A percolation test would be required to accurately
size the septic system.
Exceptions to certain sections of the Code may be
granted by the local Health Department.
A reserve area would not be required for a repair.
The system would be installed per code requirements
to maintain proper separating distance above ground
water table. It is possible this may necessitate a
elevated and pumped system.
Yours very truly,
Robert Dept la, R. S.
Environment Health Officer
cc: C. F. Shaw, Asst. Director, Public Works
Supt. Pollution Control
_ I
-� Lucek Engineering_Associates,-Inc. -
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
490 Buckland Road
South Windsor-, Connect i fit- 074
Emil W. Lucek, PE, LS ,( ` Telephone (203) 644-2474
January 23 , 1990 - -- -
Mr. Joseph Carino,Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority ---
Town of South Windsor
South Windsor, CT 06084
RE Request for sanitary sewer service of J. Kirby Holcombe
and Arthur Plumley, Abby Road
Extension
Dear Chairman Carino,
At the January 2 , 1990 meeting of the WPCA the subject request for
sanitary sewer service as discussed. At that time, you directed that
a detailed report be prepared, analyzing and comparing the costs and
benefits of providing sewer service as requested versus the replacement
or repair of individual sewage disposal systems (septic systems) .
This document will provide you with that analysis and comparison for -
your consideration and action.
REASONS FOR RE
Q
It has been 11 documented that the properties of the arties to this
request n sepl�i-���semp �t—ar ate, a e failing, and/or
iolat the State of Connecticut Public Health Cod ( see attached
correspondence of -Robert- Deptula, - South -Windsor Env ronmental Health
Officer, 2/9/88 , 3/19/88 . and 9 5 89) . These Dar ies are suffering
from improperly functioning internal plumbin s stem unhealthy and
unattractive out ide yard conditio-n-s—, 75-n-d a resulting decrease in property
value. -Both parties hav7 previously requested the advice and
the Environmassistance-
/ofth Officer regarding on site means of correcting
these conditions.
�R
( Sub-soils in this area are a Tisbury silt loam, a soil- which
characteristically suffers from a widely fluctuating water table, close
to the surface in the spring and underlain by a compact layer causing
poor internal drainage.
ALTERNATIVES TO SANTITARY SEWER SERVICE -
374 Abby Road; Property of J:Kirby-Ho1-combe-•-----
The existing septic system at this property violates the Public
Health Code in three areas.
1.Septic Tank is steel and too mall .
2 .Leaching area is too small. =
3.We.11 to septic system separang distance is not
sufficient: 40" exists; 75" required.
This Is a dangerous combination. If the leaching area is- too small _
and the well too close, there is a real danger of well-contamination.
Recent tests pits excavated by -Mr. Holcombe in the presence of the
Environment Health Officer indicated the possibility of expand.i g the
existing leaching area. If such ,an expansion was done, the . loon
existing steel septic tank (probably 1000 gallon capacit should be
replaced by -a concrete -tank of 1250 gallon capacity. Further, the
existing well must be abandoned and a new well drilled. (Note: Testing
showed that relocating the leaching area is not feasible or practical
because ledge in other parts of the property is so shallow-that the
Public Health Code requirements -would again be violated) .
A COST ESTIMATE FOR THIS WORK IS AS FOLLOWS.
Pump, disconnect, remove and. replace existing septic tank:
reconnect to system. $3200 .
_ Enlarge leaching area $2000 .
Disconnect, fill existing well , drill and reconnect
new well to house plumbing and electric $4500
TOTAL $9700 .
This work would rovide a wor stem for this property.
Howevere norma yy _uir_ed-_.syG.tPm reserve area would not be addresse
Further, ecause_ of the high ground water table, a continuing possibility
of ground water contamination would still exist.
341 Abby Road, Property of Arthur Plumley.
The existing septic system- violates-the- Public-Health Code in four areas : ? 'OF
1 . Septic tank too small "'
2 . Leaching area too small
3 . Insufficient separating stance between bottom of dry well
and ledge.�_��� ���f�� �� i ���
4 . Possible unbaff led septic tank. -oar... 4*4—d A�*t '
This septic system-is and has been documented as failing since March,
1988 . Raw sewage effluent surfaces--in the yard. The Environmental
Health Officer has sugges"ted that an unbaffled septic tank wry y be allowing
solid wastes to enter and clog the leaching areas
To correct this problem, the existing septic tank and dry wells must
be removed; the septic tanks` r laced, and -a new _leaching field installed.
In order to install a adequately s-ed` new -leaching field Public
Health Code requirements,defining separating distan es _to the pool ,
to the property lines , and to the storm sewer pipe high runs along
the south edge of this property must be ward by he Environmental
Health Officer.
2 -
If the waiver were granted, the cost of this work would be as follows :
Pump, disconnect, remove and replace existing
septic tank, reconnect to system $3 , 200 .
Remove dry wells , install new leaching fields ,
reconnect to septic tank $51000 .
w $8, 200. _
Again, this work would not provide a reserve area or address the- problem
of possible ground water contamination•._ Iu
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION
r�-
In November, 1989 , Lucek Engineering Associates proposed a -plan. for --
extending sanitary sewer service to these properties . The plan, as
designed , would also provide sewer service to two additional properties
at #331 and #355 Abby Road. Bids were solicited from area contractors ,
the low bid being $20 , 800 .00 -
TOWN INCOME FROM ASSESSMENTS
The WPCA staff has computed that assessment return to the town for
the extension would be about $13 , 000 . broken down as follows :
331 Abby Road $2150 . & $400 . connecting fee $2550 .
341 Abby Road $2150 . & $400 . connecting fee $2550 .
355 Abby Road $2883 : &` $400 . connecting fee= $3283 .
374 Abby Road $4300 . & $400 . connecting fee= $4700 .
TOTAL $13,083 .
The Town contribution would, therefore, be about $8000 .00 .6W
SUMMARY
From a comparison of the costs , to the property owners , and the town,
it is obvious that the most cost-effective expenditure by all parties
is the extension of- the sanitary sewer.
The sewer extension is a permanent solution to private and public health
concerns .
The sewer extension is a reliable solution -which will function essentially
forever. -
The sewer extension conforms to the Public Health Code and the expressed
purpose to the WPCA. - -
The sewer extension is the most logical and practical solution.
_ 3
ca
r 710v� sou ?d&&40t
e �
w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONK. 06074
'IosoR,co�'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
June 28, 1989
Jean E. Zurbrigen
Acting Town Manager
Town of South Windsor
Re: 341 Abby Road Extension
This property owner is currently having problems with his septic
system. There is leachate surfacing from the area of one drywell
which was installed approximately eleven years ago. This type of
situation usually indicates' a completely failed septic system.
However, due to the physical flow pattern within a septic system
(from the dwelling to the septic tank which retains solids, to
the distribution box which disperses effluent equally to the
leaching areas) it may be possible that an adjustment(s ) of the
distribution box may solve the problem.
As indicated above, the purpose of the distribution box is to
equally distribute liquid to the respective leaching areas . If,
during the process of backfilling the system, or if because - of
settlement after construction, the distribution box became
tipped, equal distribution may not be occurring within the
system. Therefore, in this particular case, one of two drywells
(leaching areas) may be receiving all of the effluent from the
dwelling, thereby causing premature failure of this one leaching
area, with the other dry well not receiving any effluent.
To determine if this has happened, the distribution box would
have to be excavated. This is a fairly simple process which can
easily be accomplished within one hours time by using a hand
shovel. Once the distribution box is excavated the cover would
be removed and the flow of leachate from it would be observed.
If indeed, all effluent was flowing to one leaching area,
adjustments would be made to equalize the flow. As a worse case
situation, the distribution box may have to be replaced. This
can also be accomplished by use of only a hand shovel, probably
within several hours time.
This department would be eager to provide Technical assistance to
the property owner(s) if they so desired.
R- ,/ 1' .4 6� 1
Robert Dept 1i a, R-.S. -
Environmental Health Officer
Cc: C.F. Shaw Superintendant of Pollution Control/Assistant
Director of Public Works
MEMORANDUM September 5, 1989
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works {&)
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 341 Abby Road Extension
On Friday September 1, 1989, the property-owner excavated the
distribution box of his septic system as suggested in this
Department's letter to him dated 8-17-89 (copy enclosed) .
This distribution box was not tipped or dislodged as had been
theorized and therefore is not the causative factor of the
failing septic system.
The distribution box was observed to be full to overflowing with
effluent (above the top of the outlets ) from the septic tank,
indicating that the two existing drywells are no longer capable
of absorbing effluent as quickly as it is discharged to them,
thus leading to system failure.
Solid material from the septic tank was also observed in the
distribution box. Solids should be retained in the septic tank
by means of a baffle at the outlet end. The property owner
indicated that he recalled the septic tank baffle being broken
but he could not recall if it had been repaired.
If it was not repaired, solids could have entered the leaching
areas (two existing dry wells) and clogged them, thus preventing
leachate from being absorbed.
It is currently unknown if indeed this is the situation.
Excavation of the dry wells could determine if this is the
situation or if they are naturally no longer capable of
functioning.
The property-owner was informed by this department that this
further exploration may or may not produce positive results and
could be done or not, at his discretion.
Whatever the cause, the system is presently not functioning
properly and does indeed have periods where effluent does surface
on top of the ground.
Robert Deptula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
r
SOwN Sir+ -
o
y
rA
a
y 01P S-0� ?d&U&Ot
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
lN�SOR-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511
February 6, 1990
Emil W. Lucek
Lucek Engineering Associates, Inca
490 Buckland Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Lucek:
This letter will serve to confirm this departments comments
regarding your draft report (as indicated verbally to this
department) to the Water Pollution Control Authority regarding the
request for sanitary sewer service of J. Kirby Holcombe and Arthur
Plumley, Abby Road Extension.
Reasons for request:
Even though the septic systems may not conform to current
standards, they would not be considered as violations since
they are existing conditions, except for 374 Abby Road
Extension which required the issuance of a C.O. which
mandates compliance with all codes.
The Hartford County soil survey accurately delineates soil
types by area. However, it is necessary to dig deep test
pits in the exact area that the system will go in, for
verification of soil type.
Alternatives to Sanitary Sewer Request:
374 Abby Road Extension
Lucek Engineering has indicated that a seption tank
cleaner has stated the tank is approximately 1000
gallons.
The size of the leaching area is unknown. However, if
it is the original installation, it is most likely
undersized.
If a new septic system were installed on this property
it would most likely have to be filled, necessitating a
pump to elevate above ledge, however, additional test
pits may indicate a suitable area without fill.
r
Page 2
February 6, 1990
The well may also have to be moved. However, if the
system has to be pumped anyway, it can be located far
enough away from the existing well. The purpose of a
filled septic design is to raise the system above ledge
to meet code requirements.
A reserve area would not be required for a repair.
341 Abby Road Extension
At this point, since no deep test pits were dug, the
separating distance between dry well bottom and -ledge is
only assumed.
A new baffle could be installed in the septic tank.
The existing septic tank would not have to be replaced
unless it was deteriorating.
A percolation test would be required to accurately size
the septic system.
Exceptions to certain sections of the Code may be
granted by the local Health Department.
A reserve area would not be required for a repair. The
system would be installed per code requirements to
maintain proper separating distance above ground water
table. it is possible this may necessitate a elevated
and pumped system.
Yours very truly,
Robert Deptu a, R. S.
Environment Health Officer
cc: C. F. Shaw, Asst. Direct�ar-,—Public Works
Supt. Pollution Control
T _ .
a
aAleAl
Zia L
• , � a, C.O. .,Lv�� �tieiy�c � �x�<.tZn,,.a.� (.tJ� ���
�. le7d .
I
- r
J J `
I
i Cc ,o
I
. . l
G
� . - � a
i�
t
.�'
��� � � - � �
a
�,�� �
.��u�.'
�-� ,���_
C� C� f: fLlt��fi .f�sJ�:�f- �jUllJ 1 Sa.��. �jl�l � 1
dv-
Gh •a. �Z"I�f*- d�Y 2G�.e.�Qwf� +.�..0 �-�r-��C.ca�..a„,o
-71
o._..a��.
_ 7,4
lV I � � ' 1 ` Q I 1
T �
1 �J r ` LI � I
�� f v
I
i 1 i � d
� �'
� � �- I
y j � � '�
i _1
i g i 1
�. �'�
1 I� 1 I r
i i �I � 1 I i I I
� � ��� � � �
I v
I � � ( ,
� 1 1 i
1 r ' 1
_� �
�� � � .�
_� ; ^ ��
, � �
I � � ;
I
1
I �
�1
- ---- - _ _ - � /i .e. -ate „�'_�.a*�•.�L� ..�e..
_ CC
MEMORANDUM September 5, 1989
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works (&)
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 341 Abbey Road Extension
On Friday September 1, 1989, the property-owner excavated the
distribution box of his septic system as suggested in this
Department's letter to him dated 8-17-89 (copy enclosed) .
This distribution box was not tipped or dislodged as had been
theorized and therefore is not the causative factor of the
failing septic system.
The distirubtion box was observed to be full to overflowing with
effluent (above the top of the outlets) from the septic tank,
indicating that the two existing drywells are no longer capable
of absorbing effluent as quickly as it is discharged to them,
thus leading to system failure.
Solid material from the septic tank was also observed in the
distribution box. Solids should be retained in the septic tank
by means of a baffle at the outlet end. The property owner
indicated that he recalled the septic tank baffle being broken
but he could not recall if it had been repaired.
If it was not repaired, solids could have entered the leaching
areas (two existing dry wells) and clogged them, thus preventing
leachate from being absorbed.
It is currently unknown if indeed this is the situation.
Excavation of the dry wells could determine if this is the
situation or if they are naturally no longer capable of
functioning.
The property-owner was informed by this department that this
further exploration may or may not produce positive results and
could be done or not, at his discression.
Whatever the cause, the system is presently not functioning
properly and does indeed have periods where effluent does surface
on top of the ground.
Robert Deptula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
F=4 V SOUTH WINDSOR HEALTH -2- Investigation for S e
DEPARTMENT -gin.. .ewag `.Dispossj�sys
SPWTAL CONDITIONS
System design larger than 2,000 g.p.d.
Water supP17 W&Urshed
ffigh ground water (less thaa 14 ft.)
Possible seasonal high
ground water
Watercourse, marsh or pond
Possible seasonal flooding
Limited suitable area
Slope over 15%,
Marginal, soil -
(30 60 mins.�iach) Sba1l0i ledge (less than T ft.) (�
Underlying tight soil (less than 4 ft) Other
1 7
Apj
CONCLUSION
_LF Suitable for sewage disposal,
�h go Unsuitable for sewage disposal
P e-.-9 ,, Additional investigation required
C� Retest during Wet season
Weerts 21az required /4C "
Q rp ,"et W,,C& C,4y
. DESIGN 1 ObeCMMTIONS
G r
Investigated by Title '?er,,,,. _
Confirmed/Witnessed by Title
w
Co®eats S
Bench.mark location
Elevation
f
MEMORANDUM June 20, 1989
TO: C.F. Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control and
Assistant, Director of Public Works
RE: Feasibility/Longevity of Engineer Design Septic Systems
The Connecticut Public Health Code states that certain criteria
must be met in order to install a private subsurface sewage
disposal system. In many instances, these criteria can be met
under naturally occurring conditions and the life expectancy of
these systems, if they are properly maintained, is between 20 to
30 years.
However, there are situations where suitable, naturally occurring
conditions do not exist and the above referenced criteria cannot
be met. These areas are addressed in the Health Code as areas of
special concern. The code requires that new septic systems in
areas of special concern be designed by a professional engineer.
It also states that the local authority may require an engineered
design for the repair and alteration of a septic system in an
area of special concern.
An example of an area of special concern would be maximum ground
water table less than three feet below ground surface. In this
particular situation a certain amount of fill material would have
to be added to the existing grade to elevate the bottom of the
septic system to the required height above the maximum ground
water table so as to simulate as closely as possible naturally
occurring conditions .
The existence of site specific conditions such as in this example
can be determined only by on-site observations . These
observations could be accomplished only by the digging of several
six to ten foot observation pits with a back-hoe and the digging
of a percolation test pit to a suitable depth. It is the
responsibility of the individual property owner to have the pits
dug.
t
Engineer Design Septic Systems - Page 2
June 21, 1989
Engineered design septic systems are actually quite common since
the Health Code defines many areas of special concern. These
design plans are always reviewed on the local level and sometimes
the State level as well, depending on circumstances .
Each design attempts to alleviate the site specific problem(s )
and bring the installation into compliance with the State Health
Code. From that perspective the installation would then be
similar to systems installed in natural conditions and should
have a similar life expectancy to those systems .
Robert Dept la, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/jdn
r �9
MEMORANDUM June 20, 1989
TO: C.F. Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control and
Assistant, Department of Public Works
RE: Feasibility/Longevity of Engineer Design Septic Systems
The Connecticut Public Health Code states that certain criteria
must be met in order to install a private subsurface sewage
disposal system. In many instances, these criteria can be met
under naturally occurring conditions and the life expectancy of
these systems, if they are properly maintained, is between 20 to
30 years .
However, there are situations where suitable, naturally occurring
conditions do not exist and the above referenced criteria cannot
be met. These areas are addressed in the Health Code as areas of
special concern. The code requires that new septic systems in
areas of special concern be designed by a professional engineer.
It also states that the local authority may require an engineered
design for the repair and alteration of a septic system in an
area of special concern.
An example of an area of special concern would be maximum ground
water less than three feet below ground surface. In this
particular situation a certain amount of fill material would have
to be added to the existing grade to elevate the bottom of the
septic system to the required height above the maximum ground
water table so as to simulate as closely as possible naturally
occurring conditions .
The existence of site specific conditions such as in this example
can be determined only by on-site observations . These
observations could be accomplished only by the digging of several
six to ten foot observation pits with a back-hoe and the digging
of a percolation test pit to a suitable depth. It is the
responsibility of the individual property owner to have the pits
dug.
Engineer Design Septic Systems - Page 2
June 21, 1989
Engineered design septic systems are actually quite common since
the Health Code defines many areas of special concern. These
design plans are always reviewed on the local level and sometimes
the State level as well, depending on circumstances .
Each design attempts to alleviate the site specific problem(s)
and bring the installation into compliance with the State Health
Code. From that perspective the installation would then be
similar to systems installed in natural conditions and should
have a similar life expectancy tothose systems.
Robert Deptula, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/jdn
G J �
yr 3�71
(I✓ ' =)- ,,t,� _ �s3,� 7Q,13 h ���+ ^�'°
l Oyl N Sf�
C r �CJ� Ole
a
C, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
r R.CpN AREA CODE 203/644-2511
'yOgO
August 17, 1989
Mr. Arthur Plumley
341 Abby Road Ext.
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Plumley,
As we have discussed, due to the physical flow .pattern within a
septic system (from the dwelling to the septic tank which retains
solids, to the distribution box which disperses effluent equally
to the leaching areas) it may be possible that an adjustment(s )
of the distribution box may solve the septic system problem.
As indicated above, the purpose of the distribution box is to
equally distribute liquid to the respective leaching areas . If,
during the process of backfilling the system, or if because of
settlement after construction, the distribution box became
tipped, equal distribution may not be occurring within the
system. Therefore, in this particular case, one of two drywells
(leaching areas) may be receiving all of the effluent from the
dwelling, thereby causing premature failure of this one leaching
area, with the other dry well not receiving any effluent.
To determine if this has happened, the distribution box would
have to be excavated. This is a fairly simple process which can
easily be accomplished within one hours time by using a hand
shovel . Once the distribution box is excavated the cover would
be removed and the flow of leachate from it would be observed.
If indeed, all effluent was flowing to one leaching area,
adjustments would be made to equalize the flow. As a worse case
situation, the distribution box may have to be replaced. This
can also be accomplished by use of only a hand shovel, probably
within several hours time.
This department would be eager to provide Technical assistance to
you if you so desire. If you have any questions or if I can be
of further assistance, please contact me at the South Windsor
Town Hall 644-2511 extension 248 .
Robert Dep ula, R.S.
Environmental-Health Officer
Cc: C.F. Shaw Superintendant of Pollution Control/Assistant
Director of Public Works
MEMORANDUM September 5, 1989
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works (&)
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: 341 Abbey Road Extension
On Friday September 1, 1989, the property-owner excavated the
distribution box of his septic system as suggested in this
Department's letter to him dated 8-17-89 (copy enclosed) .
This distribution box was not tipped or dislodged as had been
theorized and therefore is not the causative factor of the
failing septic system.
The distirubtion box was observed to be full to overflowing with
effluent (above the top of the outlets) from the septic tank,
indicating that the two existing drywells are no longer capable
of absorbing effluent as quickly as it is discharged to them,
thus leading to system failure.
Solid material from the septic tank was also observed in the
distribution box. Solids should be retained in the septic tank
by means of a baffle at the outlet end. The property owner
indicated that he recalled the septic tank baffle being broken
but he could not recall if it had been repaired.
If it was not repaired, solids could have entered the leaching
areas (two existing dry wells) and clogged them, thus preventing
leachate from being absorbed.
It is currently unknown if indeed this is the situation.
Excavation of the dry wells could determine if this is the
situation or if they- are naturally no longer capable of
functioning.
The property-owner was informed by this department that this
further exploration may or may not produce positive results and
could be done or not, at his discression.
Whatever the cause, the system is presently not functioning
properly and does indeed have periods where effluent does surface
on top of the ground.
Robert Deptula, RS
Environmental Health Officer
N HOUSE
(KpA
' 421
t
DRYkIE LL
3,X0
NOTES
SOUTH WINDSOR POLLUTION CONTROL
LOCATION....__5 4- 1 A B B Y ROAD
OWNER PL UM L E Y
TYPE OF WORK s-cP7(c SY�5 is M
DATE 8//0/i8 PERMIT PIPE
INSTALLER
INSPECTOR B. D. �. DRAWN BY �.
_.P
Request for Sanitary Sewers
Abbe Road Ext. South Windsor
We the undersigned residents of Abbe Road Ext. , South
Windsor request the South Windsor Sewer Commission to
authorize extension of the Town sewer system to serve
our residences.
3 aMM � �
ovi
a u0 Ye
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
�f��soa•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
June 28, 1989
Jean E. Zurbrigen
Acting Town Manager
Town of South Windsor
Re: 341 Abby Road Extension
This property owner is currently having problems with his septic
system. There is leachate surfacing from the area of one drywell
which was installed approximately eleven years ago. This type of
situation usually indicates a completely failed septic system.
However, due to the physical flow pattern within a septic system
(from the dwelling to the septic tank which retains solids, to
the distribution box which disperses effluent equally to the
leaching areas) it may be possible that an adjustment(s) of the
distribution box may solve the problem.
As indicated above, the purpose of the distribution box is to
equally distribute liquid to the respective leaching areas . If,
during the process of backfilling the system, or if because of
settlement after construction, the distribution box became
tipped, equal distribution may not be occurring within the
system. Therefore, in this particular case, one of two drywells
(leaching areas) may be receiving all .of the effluent from the
dwelling, thereby causing premature failure of this one leaching
area, with the other dry well not receiving any effluent.
To determine if this has happened, the distribution box would
have to be excavated. This is a fairly simple process which can
easily be accomplished within one hours time by using a hand
shovel. Once the distribution box is excavated the cover would
be removed and the flow of leachate from it would be observed.
If indeed, all effluent was flowing to one leaching area,
adjustments would be made to equalize the flow. As a worse case
situation, the distribution box may have to be replaced. This
can also be accomplished by use of only a hand shovel, probably
within several hours time.
This department would be eager to provide Technical assistance to
the property owner(s) if__they—qo desired.
Robert Dept la, R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
Cc: C.F. Shaw Superintendant of Pollution Control/Assistant
Director of Public Works
Aw �
Ak .
.. -
c�) 61000, j,14,0,j
0-4
�����. Cali �. � ✓�� �. ..��
�I'�/j,E/1'1*.q,�Gc�✓te- � ��/jic,4 Pxrr— ' �,�...-
e s+—�a� Q- `O�� � � Y ��" `n.�"�%��� •'G+GR .ram'-�
a �� j
March 14, 1988
MEMORANDUM
To: C. F. Shaw, Assistant Director of Public Works/
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Re: Numbers 331, 341, 355 Abby Road Ext.
A sanitary survey was conducted at the above referenced
properties. Following are the results:
#331 This property is currently for sales. The property owner
reports that sometimes drainage from the fixtures is very
slow, and that sometimes the downstairs toile's must be
flushed twice. If he does not sell his property, he wants
the sewer line extended.
#341 This property presently has a failing septic system. (Area
of sewage overflow in rear yard) . The owner wants the
sewer line extended.
#355 This property owner reports having no problems with his
septic system, and there was no evidence of failure. He
wants the sewer line extended.
Robert Deptul , R.S.
Environmental Health Officer
RD/ml
Lucek- Engineering Associates,-Inc. - -
r' -
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
- 490 Buckland Road
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 -
Emil W. Lucek, PE, LS Telephone (203) 644-2474
January 23 , 1990
Mr. Joseph Carino,Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority
Town of South Windsor -
South Windsor, CT 06084
RE: Request for sanitary sewer service of J. Kirby Holcombe
and Arthur Plumley, Abby Road -
Extension
Dear Chairman Carino,
At the January 2, 1990 meeting of the WPCA the subject request for
sanitary sewer service as discussed. At that time, you directed that
a detailed report be prepared, analyzing and comparing the costs and
benefits of providing sewer service as requested versus the replacement
or repair of individual sewage disposal systems (septic systems) .
This document will provide you with that analysis and comparison for -
your consideration and action.
REASONS FOR REQUEST
It has been well documented that the properties of the parties to this
request contain septic systems that are inadequate, are failing, and/or
violate the State of Connecticut Public Health Code. (see attached
correspondence of Robert Deptula, South Windsor Environmental Health
Officer, 2/9/88, 3/19/88 . and 9/5/89 ) . These parties are suffering
from improperly functioning internal plumbing systems, unhealthy and
unattractive outside yard conditions, and a resulting decrease in property
value. Both parties have previously requested the advice and assistance--
of the Environmental Health Officer-regarding on site means of correcting
these conditions. -
(Sub-soils in this area are a Tisbury silt loam, a soil- which
characteristically suffers from a widely fluctuating water table, close
to the surface in the spring and underlain by a compact layer causing
poor internal drainage.
ALTERNATIVES TO SANTITARY SEWER SERVICE - - -
374 Abby, Road; Property of J.Kirby Holcombe
-The existing septic system at this property violates the Public
Health Code in three areas.
1.Septic Tank is steel and too small.
-2.Leaching area is too small.
3.We11 to septic system separating distance is not
sufficient: 40" exists; 75" required. --
w
1
- This is a dangerous combination. If the leaching area is. too small
and the well- too close, there is a- real danger of well-contamination.
Recent tests pits excavated by -Mr. Holcombe_ in the presence of the
Environment Health Officer indicated the possibility of expanding the
existing leaching area. If such •an expansion was done, the
existing steel septic tank (probably 1000 gallon capacity) should be
replaced by -a concrete -tank of 1250 gallon capacity. Further, the
existing well must be abandoned and a new well drilled (Note: Testing
showed that relocating the leaching area is not feasible or practical
because ledge in other parts of the property is so shallow that the -
Public Health Code requirements -would again be violated) .
A COST ESTIMATE FOR THIS WORK IS AS FOLLOWS.
Pump, disconnect, remove and replace existing septic tank:
reconnect to system. $3200.
_ Enlarge leaching area $2000.
Disconnect, fill existing well , drill and reconnect
new well to house plumbing and electric $4500
TOTAL $9700.
This work would provide a workable septic system for this property.
However, the normally required system reserve area would not be addressed.
Further, because of the high ground watertable, a continuing possibility
of ground water contamination would still exist.
341 Abby Road, Property of Arthur Plumley.
The existing septic system violates the Public Health Code in four
areas :
1. Septic tank too small
2 . Leaching area too small
3 . Insufficient separating stance between bottom of dry well
and ledge.
4 . Possible unbaffled septic tank.
This septic system-is and has been documented as failing since March,
1988 . Raw sewage effluent surfaces---in the yard. The Environmental
Health Officer has suggested. that an unbaffled septic tank may be allowing
solid wastes to enter -and clog the leaching areas.
To correct this problem, the existing septic tank and dry wells must
be removed; the septic tanks replaced, and a new leaching field installed.
In order to install an adequately sized new leaching field, Public
Health Code requirements_ defining -separating distances to the pool,
to the property lines, and to the storm sewer pipe which runs along
the south edge of this property must be waived by the Environmental
Health Officer.
- - 2 - -
If the waiver were granted, the cost of this work would be as follows:
Pump, disconnect, remove and replace existing
septic tank, reconnect to system $3 , 200 .
Remove dry wells , install new leaching fields ,
reconnect to septic tank $5,000.
$8 ,200 . - -
Again, this work would not provide a reserve area or address the problem
of possible ground water contamination. -
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION
In November, 1989 , Lucek Engineering Associates proposed a -plan. for -
extending sanitary sewer service to these properties . The plan, as
designed, would also provide sewer service to two additional properties
at #331 and #355 Abby Road. Bids were solicited from area contractors,
the low bid being $20 ,800. 00
TOWN INCOME FROM ASSESSMENTS
The WPCA staff has computed that assessment return to the town for
the extension would be about $13 , 000. broken down as follows :
331 Abby Road $2150. & $400 . connecting fee= $2550 .
341 Abby Road $2150. & $400. connecting fee= $2550 .
355 Abby Road $2883 . & $400 . connecting fee= $3283.
374 Abby Road $4300 . & $400. connecting fee= $4700.
TOTAL $13 ,083 .
The Town contribution would, therefore, be about $8000 .00 .
SUMMARY
From a comparison of the costs, to the property owners, and the town,
it is obvious that the most cost-effective expenditure by all parties
is the extension of the sanitary sewer.
The sewer extension is a permanent solution to private and public health
concerns
The sewer extension is a reliable solution which will function essentially
forever. _
The sewer extension conforms to the Public Health Code and the expressed
purpose to the WPCA.
The sewer extension is the most logical and practical solution.
3 - -
For '
For Date �
Time
Date Time W ILE YO WERE OUT
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
M From
From Phone No. _
Phone No. Area Code Number
Extension
Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED URGENT
TELEPHONED URGENT PLEASE CALL WANTS TO SEE YOU
PLEASE CALL WANTS TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN CAME TO SEE r�
WILL CALL AGAIN CAME TO SEE YOU YOU
RETURNED YOUR CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message C&AV
Message `'`'`
AO
rotor MZ
Operator Z�� rj 9161
DATACOM 9161
Z
n —
For '
For Date iX
Time
Date Time W ILE YO WERE OUT
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
M From
From Phone No. _
Phone No. Area Code Number
Extension
Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED URGENT
TELEPHONED URGENT PLEASE CALL WANTS TO SEE YOU
PLEASE CALL WANTS TO SEE YOU WILL CAII AGAIN
WILL CALL AGAIN CAME TO SEE YOU CAME TO SEE YOU
RETURNED YOUR CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message Message
-Alp 41
012� AO
rotor MZ
Operator 9161
.DATACOM 9161
Ve
n -� a 9,z