Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Chapel Road (37)
From: hart To: gantic@TWN HALL.TOWN HALL Date: 8/25/97 9:41AM Subject: STORM DRAIN-JURGLES JOHN WAS ARRESTED AND PLACED ON A$475.00 CASH BOND.HE STILL THINKS COVEN HAS MADE CONTACT WITH YOU ABOUT THE WORK TO BE DONE.HE WAS INFORMED THAT YOU HAVE NOT HAD CONTACT WITH COVEN ABOUT THE PORJECT. TOM From: gantic To: hart Date: 8/25/97 9:49AM Subject: Re:STORM DRAIN-JURGLES I saw Mike Covensky Friday.He said he had mailed something to me but it has not appeared. He also said he gave Jurgeles a copy,but again I have not seen anything. Condition Report Chapel Road Storm Drain LOCATION: One near SNET pole#622 (178 Chapel Road) one near SNET pole#623 (160 Chapel Rod) ORIGIN: The type of design and construction would indicate that this storm drainage system was constructed in the mid-thirties to early forties. T. A. Petersen was a local engineer that often did work for the community and used this design in several areas (clay tile with 90° elbow hood to prevent floating debris from entering the pipe). CONSTRUCTION: The inlet structures are constructed with clay brick and mortar. An opening has been left on the southwest face near ground level to allow water to enter. I suspect that when originally constructed,there was a swale left along the north side of Chapel Road to collect the street run- off and overland flows from the north. Steel bars were installed in the opening and a rectangular concrete cover was placed over the manhole shaped structure. CONDITION PRIOR TO JULY 16, 1997: The two structures in question were as they have been previously described. They were complete and undamaged. Several homes had been constructed since the original installation and there was no visible evidence that a swale ever existed along the north side of Chapel Road. The area is mostly lawn area. CONDITION JULY 16, 1997: The structures had been damaged by some sort of mechanical equipment as evidenced by the condition of the structures and the tire tracks left adjacent to them. The top row of bricks is not completely intact. DETAILS: The inside diameter of the round manholes is 46". The outside diameter is 62 inches. The rectangular covers were 66" x 66" and are broken and no longer usable. Standard manhole frames are not large enough in diameter to safely span the 46" diameter hole. Special manhole frames are available. r 8 One frame that is available has a grate type top has an outside flange dimension of 50 '/2 inches. This would leave a 2" wide footprint on the brick if the manhole frame was perfectly centered. Another frame available is larger at 62" outside frame diameter. This has two covers. One smaller than the other at 22" inch diameter. The other 50" in diameter. No inlet type grate is available. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Remove and replace entire structure with all standard construction. $1,500 ea. 2. Leave at current height, replace loose or missing bricks and place one of the non standard covers. $750 ea. 3. Remove 10 or more courses of brick and corbel in to fit standard manhole frame. $1,000 ea. SPECIAL NOTES: The structure furthest east at Starr's (178 Chapel) serves to collect water from the vacant land north of Chapel Road. During months when the ground is frozen, rain on accumulated snow could create conditions where a grated structure may not receive the run off at a sufficient enough rate to contain the flow. Even leaving a side opening may not be enough if grass, leaves, etc. accumulate at the inlet. Neither of these structures will be needed for collection of the street run off since the new construction. However, the pipe in them will carry the flow downstream to the Podunk River. If the structure near 178 Chapel is completely rebuilt a stub pipe should be left on the north side for a future private connection. MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer FROM: Robert T. Donahue, Project Engineer 7/ g/97 DATE: July 24, 1997 RE: CHAPEL ROAD — REPORT OF CONVERSATIONS WITH.MR. JURGELAS I was inspecting the Chapel Road Culvert project on the afternoon of July 11, 1997. The Guerrera Construction crew had left the site and Mr. Starr and Mr. Jurgelas were present at the driveway entrance to Mr. Starr's house. Mr. Starr brought my attention to the yard drain in the tree belt just west of his driveway and asked when it would be repaired. I explained to him that there were no Immediate plans to upgrade the two yard drains he referred to. The other is abutting the Cordeiro property approximately two hundred feet west. He became loud and angry upon hearing this and Mr. Jurgelas began to complain as well. They remarked that the rich people on the other side of Town wouldn't be neglected. I told them that I did not have the authority to upgrade the structures at their request. Mr. Starr then asked why the Town should bother to send me to a job site if I could not fix what was wrong. Mr. Jurgelas then began to complain about the Guerrera Construction crew. He felt they did nothing all day besides building one catch basin while the roadway was dirty and dusty. He said to me, 'you call yourself a [expletive] inspector — would you want to live with that [expletive] being blown on your home". Since these men were becoming abusive I told them that I was returning to the office and I left. I inspected the site on July 14, 1997 and Mr. and Mrs. Starr were present in front of their house. They complained to me that no one had contacted them about the yard drains. When I told them there were no immediate plans to upgrade the structures, they both became visibly upset but Mrs. Starr seemed to be more rational so I continued to speak directly to her. She mentioned contacting a State representative but I told her that might be a bit extreme. I suggested that she deal directly with Town officials and politicians regarding this matter. She mentioned the high taxes that she was paying and I changed the subject to the South Windsor Public Schools which she seemed to approve of. Her husband remained annoyed at the situation but the conversation ended there. While inspecting the Chapel Road site during the morning of July 15, 1997, I had the truck parked in the tree belt next to John Jurgelas's house. He drove by me in a golf cart while I was seated in the truck talking to the Engineering Department office. He drove by the vehicle very close and stared right at me without saying anything or acknowledging me in any way. (It seemed to me that he was attempting to intimidate me and seemed to enjoy being abusive.) A ' Jerry Iazzetta Re: Chapel Road July 24, 1997 Page 2. When I inspected the site later that afternoon, Mr. Jurgelas was using his own roller to compact a trench patch connecting two new catch basins east of his home. When he stopped operating the roller he looked - at me and began complaining about the yard drains and the outrageous taxes that he pays. I replied that South Windsor was among the finest towns east of the Connecticut River to which he replied, "[expletive] you" He was again loud and abusive to me in front of the entire Guerrera Construction crew. I finished my inspection and returned to the office. On the morning of July 16, 1997, the operator for Guerrera Construction brought my attention to the damaged yard drains which were the subject_ of past complaints from the Starrs and John Jurgelas. I immediately contacted Ron Asselin who appeared at the site ten minutes later. He informed me to report this to Jerry Iazzetta and to take photographs of the damaged structures. I went to the Engineering Department to inform Jerry and to get the camera. When I returned to the site I ,spoke to a police officer concerning all that I knew about the situation. On short notice I failed to report all of the contents of this report but mentioned Mr. Starr and Mr. Jurgelas as two residents who were upset about the condition of the existing yard drains. I then photographed the structures and noticed tire tracks in front of both which indicated that a skid steer loader might have been responsible for the damage. RTD/jsv -GU RRERA General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian Street CO., INC. Phone(203) 268-4159 Fax(203) 888-7191 Oxford,CT 06478 July 30, 1997 "Revised Mr. Jerry Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement South Windsor, CT Dear Jerry, We are pleased to provide you with our estimate for the following: -Repair of 2 manholes to be converted to catch basins (Budgetary number only) $1,000.00 each Sincerely,1 Robert J. Rossi Project Superintendent RJR/ss 2 � 1 ,cE E0 ..� Alit G or s V s G UERRERA General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian Street CO., INC. Phone (203)268-4159 Fax (203) 888-7191 Oxford,CT 06478 July 30, 1997 "Revised Mr. Jerry Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement South Windsor, CT Dear Jerry, We are pleased to provide you with our estimate for the following: -Repair of 2 manholes to be converted to catch basins (Budgetary number only) $1,000.00 each Sincerely, Robert J. Rossi Project Superintendent RJR/ss 2 S NO G 1 .o W °r s v JUL-30 97 09:24 FROM:CUERRERA CONST. CO. 203-99e-7191 T0:260 G44 3781 PAGE:02 C UERR'R General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian Street CO., INC. Phone(203)268-4159 Fax(203) 868-7191 Oxford,CT 06478 July 30, 1997 **Revised Mr. Jerry lazzetta Town. of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor.,CT 06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement, South Windsor., CT Dear Jerry, We are pleased to provide you with mnr ectimwe, for the following: -Repaii of 2 enaeibvics lu be convertud its catch basins (Budgetary number only) $1,000.00 each Sincerely, Robert J.Rossi Project Superintendent RJR1ss MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer FROM: RobertT. Donahue, Project Engineer IR7177 DATE: July 24, 1997 RE: CHAPEL ROAD — REPORT OF CONVERSATIONS WITH.MR. JURGELAS I was inspecting the Chapel Road Culvert project on the afternoon of July 11, 1997. The Guerrera Construction crew .ham left the site and Mr. Starr and Mr. Jurgelas were present at the driveway entrance to Mr. Starr's house. Mr. Starr brought my attention to the yard drain in the tree belt just west of his driveway and asked when it would be repaired. I explained to him that there were no immediate plans to upgrade the two yard drains he referred to. The other is abutting the Cordeiro property approximately two hundred feet west. He became loud and angry upon hearing this and Mr. Jurgelas began to complain as well. They remarked that the rich people on the other side of.Town wouldn't be neglected. I told them that I did not have the authority to upgrade the structures at their request. Mr. Starr then asked why the Town should bother to send me to a job site if I could not fix what was wrong. Mr. Jurgelas then began to complain about the Guerrera Construction crew. He felt they did nothing all day besides building one catch basin while the roadway was dirty and dusty. He said to me, "you call yourself a [expletive] inspector — would you want to live with that [expletive] being blown on your home". Since these men were becoming abusive I told them that I was returning to the office and I left. I inspected the site on July 14, 1997 and Mr. and Mrs. Starr were present in front of their house. They complained to me that no one had contacted them about the yard drains. When I told them there were no immediate plans to upgrade the structures, they both became visibly upset but Mrs. Starr seemed to be more rational so I continued to speak directly to her. She mentioned contacting a State representative but I told her that might be a bit extreme. I suggested that she deal directly with Town officials and politicians regarding this matter. She mentioned the high taxes that she was paying and I changed the subject to the South Windsor Public Schools which she seemed to approve of. Her husband remained annoyed at the situation but the conversation ended there. While inspecting the Chapel Road site during the morning of July 15, 1997, I had the truck parked in the tree belt next to John Jurgelas's house. He drove by me in a golf cart while I was seated in the truck talking to the Engineering Department office. He drove by the vehicle very close and stared right at me without saying anything or acknowledging me in any way. (It seemed to me that he was attempting to intimidate me and seemed to enjoy being abusive.) Jerry Iazzetta Re: Chapel Road July 24, 1997 Page 2. When I inspected the site later that afternoon, Mr. Jurgelas was using his own roller to compact a trench patch connecting two new catch basins east of his home. When he stopped operating the roller he looked-at me and began complaining about the yard drains and the outrageous taxes that he pays. I replied that South Windsor was among the finest towns east of the Connecticut River to which he replied, "[expletive] you" He was again-loud an-d abusive tr�-n7P v in front of the entire Guerrera Construction crew. I finished my inspection and returned to the office. On the morning of July 16, 1997, the operator for Guerrera Construction brought my attention to the damaged yard drains which were the subject_ of past complaints from the Starrs and John Jurgelas. I immediately contacted Ron Asselin who appeared at the site ten minutes later. He informed me to report this to Jerry Iazzetta and to take photographs of the damaged structures. I went to the Engineering Department to inform Jerry and to get the camera. When I returned to the site I .spoke to a police officer concerning all that I knew about the situation. On short notice I failed to report all of the contents of this report but mentioned Mr. Starr and Mr. Jurgelas as two residents who were upset about the condition of the existing yard drains. I then photographed the structures and noticed tire tracks in front of both which indicated that a skid steer loader might have been responsible for the damage. RTD/jsv G UERRERA General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian Street CO, INC. Phone (203)268-4159 Fax(203)888-7191 Oxford,CT 06478 July 30, 1997 "Revised f; Jerry Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement South Windsor, CT Dear Jerry, We are pleased to provide you with our estimate for the following: -Repair of 2 manholes to be converted to catch basins (Budgetary number only) $1,000.00 each Sincerely, 0 Robert J. Rossi Project Superintendent RJR/ss 2 � AUG 1 JIL-30 "97 09,24 FROM-GUERRERA CONG7. CO. 203-192E-7191 TOe860 644 3791 PAGE-02 G UERRERA General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian street CO./ INC. Phone(203)268-4139 Fax(203) 888-7191 Oxford,Cr 06478 July 30, 1997 **Revised Mr. Jerry twetta Town.of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,C'I'06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement South Windsor, CT Dear Jerry, We. are pleased to provide you with nnr estimate. for the following: -Repair of t muct.bulcs lu tic cunvcrtc d to catch basins (Budgetary number only) S1,000.00 each Sincerely, Robert J.Rossi Project Superintendent FJR/ss JUL-30 97 09:24 FROM:GUEPRERA CONST. CO. 203-99e-7191 TO:860 G44 3791 PAG2!02 G UE.RRERA General CONSTRUCTION Contractors 154 Christian Street CO., INC. Phone(203)268-4139 Fax(203)868-7191 Oxford,CT 06478 July 30; 1997 **Revised Mr. Jerry iazzetta Town.of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor.,CT 06074 Re: Chapel Road Bridge Replacement South Windsor, CT Dear Jerry, We are pleased to provide you with nnr estimate for the following: -RepaiL 0 f 2 i►ia[11tLACS lu be conwrtc;d to catch basins (Budgetary number only) $1,000.00 each Sincerely, Az -? Robert J.Rossi Project Superintendent RJR1ss �OyN N Se4 m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 oSOB nor AREA CODE 860/644-251 1 September 30, 1997 Attorney James H. Throwe 33 Connecticut Boulevard East Hartford, Connecticut Dear Mr. Throwe: SUBJECT: STORM DRAIN DAMAGE/CHAPEL ROAD/JURGELAS Please be advised that as of this date the storm drain damage caused by Mr. Jurgelas has been repaired to the satisfaction of the Town of South Windsor. Very truly yours, Michael J. Gantick, E. Director of Public Works MJG:bmr Cc: Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Streets Barry Guliano, Town Attorney Matthew B. Galligan, Town Manager TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074-2786 Telephone # ( 8601 644-25 F FAX # (860 ) 644-3781 DATE Sept . 30, 1997 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME Attorney James H. Throwe COMPANY FAX # 282- 1539 FROM: NAME Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works , Town Hall TITLE South Windsor MESSAGE: See attached letter re: Storm Drain Damage/Chapel Rd./Jurgelas If you did not receive all pages (including the cover) ,- or if you have any questions, please call 644-2511 as soon as possible. C� CON THEUNIS WERKHOVEN.MAYOR RON OSELLA,DEPUTY MAYOR To um o Maackester WALLACE J.IRISH.JR..SECRETARY f; = • 8 ® Cq DIRECTORS 41 Center Street STEPHEN T.CASSANO o e�B� ®®e�� Manchester, Connecticut 06040 JOYCEG.EPSTEIN JAMES F.FOGARTY ELLEN BURNS LANDERS GEOFFREYNAAB RICHARD J SARTOR.GENERAL MANAGER THOMAS M.RYAN 2 j September 25, 1991 RECEivEO Mr. Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E. j �pcYlodn Town Engineer Town of South Windsor 1+ 1540 Sullivan Avenue 6 � South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Replacement of Town Line Monument at Chapel Road Dear Mr. Iazzetta, In response to your August 20, 1991 letter, the Town of Manchester agrees to maintain the immediate road surface sur- rounding the monument described above. We have enclosed a copy of our construction specifications for the setting of this bound and we are confident if this is utilized only minor settlement will take place. Please contact this office with your intended schedule for monument placement as Mr. Scott Neff, L.L.S. desires to be present when the monument is set. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 647-3152 . Thank you for your concern in this matter. Since el , 4' Willia J. Camosci Direc or of Engineering Services SLN: lfb Enc1 : cc: Scott Neff, L.L. S . , Chief of Surveys, Manchester Peter P. Lozis, Jr. , P.E. , Director of Public Works ,Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works, South Windsor An Equal Opportunity Employer COVER DIM TX 12" CAST IRON FRAMES COVER FOR TOWN BOUNDARY MARKER MIN. WGT. 62 Ibs- • C('NFOF.M TO AA SH.TO.-M105 CLASS 25 (c4mc�3Ect- ' 2 Soa en- 2900 i I A �- - --� A I 1 ; L � I I NOTE PLAN VIEW DUE TO THE INCREASE IN TH: ROADWAY WIDTH, THE EXISTING TOWN BOUNDARY MARKER WiLL[3E WI-HIN THE PAVEMENT AR•=A -HE FRAME Q COVER IS R=_WIRED PROPOSED FRAME 12 TO COVER THE MCNJMENT IN THE AND COVER RCAC'WAY ARE A I , "DEPRESSION 1 FINISHED PAV'T IN TRAVELWAY e BIT. CO 40 v 4'± GRANITE Wm STGNE TGNN BOUNDARY z{_ MARKER z �v 61Im_ I a PROCESSED AGGREGATE _ BASE t I 407E 2 BAGS(BOLBS EACH) OF DRY MORTAR MIX, SHALL BE MIXED WITH PROCESSED •� AGGREGATE BASE ' 12 12" MATERIAL WITHIN THESE LIMITS . •'� COMPACTED ORIGINAL GROUND SECTION IA - A" TYPICAL DETAIL RESETTING TOWN BOUNDARY MARKER W/ NEW FRAME AND COVER �towN sf'q�� o r `W U �sotdA s a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 October 2, 1988 Tri-State Excavators Inc. 13-9 St. Marc Circle South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Street Opening Permit #495 For Chapel Road Gentlemen: In accordance with ordinances of the Town of South Windsor governing excavations within the Town Right of Way where there appears to be concern for the public safety and welfare by such excavation, you are hereby directed to restore the surface in the area disturbed by installing the utilities to 340 Chapel Road. If you have any questions, you can contact me Or Lester Braddock at 644-2511, Ext. 240 . Very truly yours, A. Bowen Davies Deputy Town Engineer ABD/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Lester A. Braddock, Sr. Engr. I s ector 02UENBH0058 The Hartford Insurance - Y ~ . MEMORANDUM April 29, 1988 / TO: Richard Sartor , Town Manager RE: One hundred and twelve .Chapel Road in between Route 5 and Main Street. It is on the north side of the road , and a little west of the center of this stretch. If one is driving westerly on Chapel Road from Main Street the illusion of a mailbox and paper tube being in the street is presented. The pavement is not in the center of the right-of-way. It meanders left and right , and in some cases the north edge of pavement appears coincide with the apparent street line. As one approaches 112 Chapel , which is just over a slight knoll , the ` pavement alignment becomes more centered in the right-of-way and the ' illusion of the mailbox in the street disappears. The driveway at 112 is fairly flat and looks to be below the road. It is even possible that water from the street may enter the driveway here. Certainly, if the gutter at this location were raised the water would run down the driveway toward the garage. The visual impression when looking from east to west , is that the road tilts northerly and that it may have 7 or 8 inches of crown. However , when looking from west to east , the crown does not look that severe*. I think the flatness of the driveway has something to do with it. I will ash the Engineering Division to take elevations at this location to see just what the elevations are, and refer the site question to Chief Tyler for a recommendation on signing. ' . .~^ ,^.. a. , J"'"r' Superintendent of Street Services MC8/dm c: Michael Gantick ca OE F I Tv vo Gk' oz M C � A Town aie Sot&h ?dzad�lot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �tioSOR.00 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 RICHARD J. SARTOR Town Manager April 29, 1988 Mr. Jack Lawton 112 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mr. Lawton: I received your letter of April 25, 1988, in which concern was expressed for safety due to .road conditions. I have requested the Director of Public Works, Mr. Michael Gant.ick, to investigate and report as to road conditions and safety in front of your home. Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention, so that appropriate review is initiated. Very truly yours, T wn Mar er RJS:prb cc: Director of Public Works EVEd MAY 3 1988 of SL Pat 8 9 F r . 9.'.� ✓ti..oa-cam ��� � .20 ���" =�. \cvv STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION r4wsrk* A G x,,rx !3> �f DES March 17, 1988 Fuss & O'Neil Incorporated 210 Main Street Manchester , CT 06040 Attn: William Ginter Subject : State Project 132-89, Storm Drainage reconstruction Chapel Street , South Windsor Dear Sir : As related in our correspondence to February 22, 1988 no diversion permit is required for the above mentioned project . Be advised that that the drainage improvements contemplated by the town for the future which would ultimately utilize the proposed 60" culvert under Route 5, may require a water diversion permit. Future drainage proposals for this area should be submitted to this office for review. Should you have questions on this matter , contact Andrew Smith of my staff at 566-7160. Sincerely, Benjamin A. Warner Director Water Resources Unit BAW:AGS:ps cc : Town of South Windsor , Engineer 1 t� � MAR Z 5 19� �. L 8 � 6 Phone: 165 Capitol Avenue • Hartford, Connecticut 06106 An Equal Opportunity Employer _U .SOW N 6 c r - w n 0-/?Slott,-! L C e � a + � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R-CO � AREA CODE 203/644.2511 June 15, 1983 Ms. Cheryl Hyland Mr. Robert Staruski 71 Timothy Road East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Ms. Hyland & Mr. Staruski: I wish to acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 8, 1983, to Commissioner Elisha Freedman, concerning the condition of various roads and appurtenances in the area. I would also like to offer the following information concerning Chapel Road ,and the railroad crossing on Chapel Road at Route 5 in South Windsor. We have, at present, two distinct projects in the preliminary design phase. The first project is the "Reconstruction of Chapel Road" from the Manchester Town Line to within ± 30 feet of the previously mentioned railroad crossing. This will be a federally funded project administered through the Connecticut Department of Transportation. Construction of this project is expected to begin in 1985 . The second project is also being administered by the Connecticut Department of Transportation. This project involves the total reconstruction of three (3) railroad crossings within South Windsor, one of which is the crossing that you referred to. The timetable established for this project is similar to that set for the recon- struction of Chapel Road. Both of these projects were initiated through the realization of both local and State personnel that serioud problems do exist. Until construction can actually begin on these projects, every effort is being, and will continue to be made, to insure that this roadway is kept in the best possible condition. Very truly yours, Rob t r enault Director of Public Works RA:bw cc: Richard J. Sartor, Town Manager O 71 Timothy Road East Hartford, CT 06108 S % \0 June 8, 1983 R� \016VP 11 � c Commissioner Elisha Freedman State of Connecticut Bureau of Public Works N 165 Capital Avenue Hartford, CT Dear Commissioner Freedman: You think that just because your crew goes out every year in the --------spring and -f-ills. -•the -potholes.,,-:that-4-he—r4oads-.are good to travel v.. .. on for another year. All you are doing is making more bumps in the road as there is no way a few pats with a hand shovel will make a smooth filling. And, the excess loose tar pebbles end up sticking to or hitting your car each time you drive over a newly filled pothole. This letter, which should have been written five years ago, is now being sent to you, along with others named at the bottom, due to the recently filled holes on the road of the Bissell Bridge; Rte 291, Windsor to Bloomfield; School Street, East Hartford; as well as complaining about why the railroad tracks on Chapel Road, South Windsor and School Street, East_ Hartford (both sets) are still a mess. I have been driving on these roads to and from work in Bloomfield daily for the past five years and my boyfriend also has been driving on these roads since 1971. About three years ago, the RR tracks -on School St, EH near Rte 5 were poorly repaired, the tracks near Tolland St are still shock absorber killers. Why is this? Part of School St was repaved, poorly I might add_ , why not all of it? As for the RR tracks on Chapel -Road, 'South -Windsor. near. Rte 5, .they are the pits! Bob and I will be traveling on this road come July, as we will be moving to Tolland and do not look forward to crossing them. Why should we have to break every time we come to RR tracks when they could look as good ad:he ones. on Ellington Rd, South Windsor, near Lou's Restaurant. And, now, the Bissell Bridge/Rte 291 roads. I cannot believe. that pakting white lines on either side of -the -toll booth takes precedence over repair and repaving the main road. There are more bumps on the Rte 291 now than before. At least when you fill potholes, get a roller out instead of hand shovels. The intersection at Rte .291 and Deerfield St has never been repaired without causing a roller coaster ride daily. The cost of the toll increasei2 years ago so "the roads could be improved" among other reasons, however, Bob and I have yet to see any noticeable improvement. Page 2 I am sure you, Commissioner, travel on roads that aren't to your liking or cross RR tracks that perhaps cause you to get new shocks sooner, but why prohibit tandem trailers from using- the major highways when Connecticut cannot even take care of their regular roads that its residents travel daily. Sincerely, Cheryl Hyland Robert 1&tarulsW4 and saw that new yellow lines were painted is this really going to help the roads! ! ! cc: Governor Wm. O'Neil Public Works-Dept, -East Hartford, Mr. Mulligan Richard Torpey, llth District Donald Bates, 9th District Tim Moynihan, loth District John Woodcock, III, 14th District Ruth Fahrback, 61st District Public Works Dept, South Windsor, Robert Arsenault Public Works Dept, Windsor, Mr. Phillips Congresswoman Barbara Kennelly Senator Christopher Dodd i k:AAMINA I IDN REPORT - - rnr► accrrvn ror r_va. urvrsron use LABORATORY N TOYMN NO. PHYSICAL CO MT )L-81.REV. 1�-74 1. Type or print one set and send to the address below. 6885 132 ' � 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of cX37 health or state agencies. DATE RECEIVED DATE R RT .'TO: Cdnn. State Dept. of Health, Laboratory Div., P.O. Box 1689 Hartford, CT 06101 3-3-77 COLLECTION NAM F PROPERTY Where sample was taken) ADDRESS Detrex Chem. Corp. OWN _ REPo:4r; P 260. Chapel Rd. So. Windsor ILL CTED BYfName) COLLECTOR'SNO DATECOLLECTED TIMEC LLECTEO SAMPLIN OINT C. McClellan BSW 3-3-77 10:00 A .M. Wash room. Iaarne and Address of person to receive Laboratory Report Well Semi-Public Privates Identification: IX ❑ - None Filtered Chlorinated Softerre.1. Treatment: F;;71 ❑ ❑ ("( L..� E A.S.D. Other?Specity) ...._ NAME OE'LA8 THAT MADE LAST 7XAMATE OF LAST M .. state 9-76 r-k.OPERT`t OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS(If different from name and address above) ;Jahn Nielson & Sons Inc., 260 Chanel Rd. Fold Reason For Conformation to Laws Suspected o 1Caa-using Disease Other (Specify or give details here) Here, Examination: ❑ (Specify) J '(Clive Details) ❑ Complaints Color Odor Taste Sediment Foaming, Other (Specify) Of:: ❑ ] E ❑ ❑ ❑ Use Of Constant Emergency DATEOF LAST USE CONDITIONS THAT MA-Y AFFECT WATER QUALITY(Specify) Supply: !U� in use solvent storage ?ource Of Drilled Well Driveennit dWell Dug Well Spring Other(specify) *!ester: ❑ E�J ❑ ❑ ❑ r je WELL DEPTH WELL DIAMETER CONDITION OF CURB AND TOP SEAL DATE OF LAST PLUMBING WORK INSYSTEM scription Of Waier Source: 30 - Ft. 2 In. buried - - Passible Source Septic Tank Farm Industry Other (Specify) W t"y,ollution: ❑ ❑ ❑ solvent sner.ial Tests Bacti, Chem. and Hydrocarbons &. Organohalides ?equ iced Additional Description If Needed: ,+-7na`ure DATE SENT i;,r! Title: Cliff' McClellan - Sr. Sanitarian 3_3_77 iABORATORY EXAMINATION REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Division) Note: Chemical results are in Mg/L. :PARENT COLOR l TRUE COLOR l ODO TURBIDITY %trong Hydrocabrons 2 NITRITE Sodium as No Maganese as Mn cgxiyl'�8, ttc i _. oxo NITRATE Alkalinity as CoCO3 Bicarbonate Fluoride as F ' Nitrogen 2.I ►"%t)S fo rose,- yle'i�'.. �S' C `rf :. nstituents 3.0 a!G r & as AMMONIA le4,38 Alkalinity as CaCO3 Carbonate Detergent as ABS - - - - trogan (N) than 0.05 0.0 ALBUMINQRsB Total Hardness as CaCO3 Sulfate as SOq Hydrogen-ion Concentration(pli) than C.05 26. brides as Cl Iron as Fe MEMBRANE FILTER TEST 0'2 Coliform Colonies/100ML. 01. y CONCLUSIONS:The results of the analysis of this somple- htcct the require-:cnts for a potable water. _ j tic t the requirt:munt4 for a potabl-c water; however, the chemical or physical constituents listed below appear abnormally high for a ground supply. The ' %N 1..•r should he suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents is a potentially harmful one. a,not meet the t,aa rements for a potable water because: -f-coliforn,d rnity exceeds acceptable limits. The presence of the colifotm group, while not necessarily meaning that disease producing organisms; are present, does indicate that such contamination might reach the supply to the same extent. The water should be considered as unsafe for drinking . until the source of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. I he concentration of certain chemical or physical constituents exceeds acceptable limits. These are as follows: © 0 ff -ir�c3rbe.rs; C}nt ,I slightly tow pH y �'1.os� ti e'i�c`f�'d ��✓� �>thet: , Varer sap— t/4 c be S-v s: RIC—C MAR 151977 n•{-Y.a _-.— -- — - - K,/" r_A�,.__ IOri dCq rrVU — L... W—F.'W"Vs@ i dTION REPORT LABORS-0 TOWN NO. PH tCpL t; LLTr REV. 12-74 1.Type or print one set and send to the address below. e� PAU 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of health or state agencies. 51 AN DATE Ef D ; TE RE TO: Comm. State Dept. of Health, Laboratory Div., P.O. Box 1689 Hartford, CT 06101 3 '" NAM FPROPERTY(Where...5ampla;awas taken) ADDRESS r TOWPO COLLECTION ! �. REPORT: (` {_ ? 'I? r i;t�. L •. :2 i._ :F../y 1l /\ _.��1� ,.e. �. ; '-Ot i LTEO 8Y iNsr-ir) ( COLL C OR'S�NO' DATE COLLECTEDTIME COLLECTED SAMPLING OI 3 <. )"#fl 4�' I/��''(.F.•: ,' If ✓ ,:] .f"r ,f ii�.�� /'� M. 14ome and Address of person to receive Laboratory Report Well Semi-Publie Private Identification: None Filtered Chlorinated Softene Treatment: y» Other (SPeclty). NAME OF LAS THAT MADE LAST EXAM DATE Of LAST EXAM. iE Op RTY OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS(it different from name and address above) Fold _ Here sown For Conformation to Laws Suspects of Causing Disease Other (Spgoify or give details ere) i~,+tt mination: (Specify) ❑(GfNe Details) ❑ Complaints Color Odor Taste Sediment Foaming Other(Specify) of:, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑. ' Asir Of Constant mergency 'DATEOF LAST USE CONOITIONS THAT MA )AFFECT WATER QUALI A.y( pecify)f ivpply /.,r .-tA: e r � ti•t iavree Of Drillbd Well Driven Well Dug Well Spring Other(Specify) wafer: _ F_j IR ❑ ❑ ❑ WELL DEPTH WELL DIAMETER. CONDITION OF CU yP! AND TOP SEgL DATE OF LAST PLUMBING WORK IN5Y5 EM 34ascription Of f/ (at.r Source: Ft. 'nssibie Source Septic Tonk Form Industry Other (Specify) .if Pollution; ❑ ❑ El }-firt1T K.'"l•!. peciol Tests acquired )'14 ./i ,y: +t Xr ✓ ! - i?ditionai Description If Needed: r" I DATE SENT ignature J �? 1rd Title: r .- ✓ - �F' i` v�/ PLI :. LABORATORY EXAMINATION REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Division) Nate: Chemical Oesults are in MglL« F?ARE_NT COLOR TRUE COLOR ODOR - TURBIDITY - f� NiT ITE Sodium as No Magonese as Mn 6T^ ana Aa 1, es 0. 00:3 NITRATE Alkalinity as C00O3 Bicarbonate Fluoride as FQ. 'Nitrogen n 3 fe` ,; :nstituents as AMMONIA Alkalinity as.CoCO3Carbonate Detergent as ABS Nitrogen (N) `+.0• 0.L-, c ALBIlMINOip� Total Hardness as C00O3. Sulfate as SOy Hydrogen-ion Concentration{pH} .Kforides as Cl - Iron as Fe MEMBRANE FILTER TEST q L) C`_ if Coliform Colonies/100ML. l CONCLUSIONS:The results of the analysis of this'scimple- t'ect th., requirements for a potable wa:cr. ?:feet the requirements for a potable water; however,the chemical or physical constituents listed below appear abnormally high for a ground supply. 'ine watct should be suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents is a potentially hartnU one. �., A. C. DAUB r-; Di not =meet the requirements for a pot-able water because: ❑'llie :oliforrn density exceeds acceptable limits. The presence of the coliform group, viailc not necessarily meaning that disease producing organisms-' ar l reser;a, does indicate that such contamination might reach the supply to the stone extent. The water should be considered as unsafe for drinking' _ until the source of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. C'nc r ��"EhF concentration of certain chemical or physical constituent exceeds acceptable limits. 'These are as,allows: � `I't1Ca,� p ��=�l•{ j t/r?�C i" �a;:•+^�O l-�G�. bt% G. C,)C ''�.S�rJ (5 S 3`�'i♦S'�c's G�Tc' � { iOther: .0j".'r+C ay ics�S+ r h�trS dF /urrs.� fJaatC 2�C2 `" MAR 1519F . L. COLE ` LABORATORY-_40 TOWN NO. PHYSICAL COMa?LpJE_: •I.W.L-81 �.ev. 12-74 1. Type or print one set and send to the address below. 6884 13�, 1SS 117�EE 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of a health or state agencies. DATE RECEIVED DATE R£ Ft'fED TO_ Conn. State Dept. of Health, Laboratory Div., P.O. Sox 1689 Hartford, CT 06101 3-3-?7 .3- 77 �; OLLF_CTIaN NAME OF R RTY(f(.'here sample was taken} ADDRESS -- -]TOWN REPORT; � National Auto Parts 240 Chapel Road Sputh Windsor �CO -C;EQ BY(Na:rte) COL LECTOR'S NO A7 COLLEC7E0 TIME COLLECTEG SAMPLING POINT '�, t,` CZellan 2Sw 3-3-77 9:30 A..M. wash sink _Mamc and Address of person to receive Laboratory Report. Well Semi-Public Private Identification: El { i None Filtered Chlorinate Softened Treatment: MV ❑ El • Other(Specify) ' L�I • NAME OF LAB THAT MADE LAST EXAM DATE OF LAST AM. state 9-76 PRCF-ERTY OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS(If different from name and address above) lfere4 :Reason Far Conformation to Laws Suspected of Causing Disease Other (Specify or give details here) ".Exomination: El (Specify) ❑(Give Details) ❑ ;Complaints Color Odor Testa Sediment Foaming Other(Spacfty) L�J� LL_X_11 Use Of Constant Emergency DATE OF LAST USE CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFECT WATER QUALITY(specify) +Supply: © ❑ in use solvent spill urea Of Drilled Well Driven Well Dug Well . Spring Other(Specify) n WELL DEPTH WELL DIAMETER CONDITION OF CURB AND TOP SEAL DATE OF LAST PLUMBING WORK IN SYSTEM 11e6criptio W-uter Source:Of 30 Ft. 2 In. buried 160ssible Source Septic Tank Form Industry Other (Specify) Of Pollution: �] ❑ ❑ ® solvent spill Special Tests , Required; Bact. , Chem and Hydrocarbons & OrganoWides �oditionul Description If Needed: Strong solvent smell T $i:)nature DATE SENT lurid Title: C. McClellan, Sr. Sanitarian 3-3-77 LABORATORY EXAMINATION REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Divis;lon) Note: Chemibal result} are in Mg/L. APP¢RENT COLOR TRUE COLOR ODOR �, I URBIDITY 1 2 2 Strong hydrocarbons NITRITE Sodium as No Magonese as Mn + 0.002 � A !: Nitrogen NITRATE � Alkalinity as C00O3 Bicarbonate Fluoride as F 3• � i! Constituents 7.0 to « `r- as AMMONIA less Alkalinity as CoCO3 Carbonate Detergent as ABS . Nitrogen (N) w)lEld! 0.05 0.0riCfafDYdt4�s?+� jl3d. !t AL$UMiNO (,fi8 Total Hardness asCaCO3 Sulfotaios SO4 Hydfogen-ion�Conncentration(pH), 8• ; • W:,:orides as CI Iron as Fe MEMBRANE FILTER TEST s 3•0 0.0 Coliform Colonies/1100ML. 0 't— CONCLUSIONS:The results of the analysis of this sample- I %,t tl.r rcquintlicnts for a potable water. y - 9 - �i. r tho requirc•tnents for a potable water: however,the chemical or physical constituents listed tSelow appear abnormally high Eor a ground supply. "ihe } wat s should be suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents iP a potentially harmful one. ,. ' �:ot :reef the requirements for a potable water because: i "Rte coliiorm density exceeds acceptable limits. The presence of the coliform group, while not necessarily meaning that disease producing organisms' are present, does indicate that such contamination might teach the supply to the same extent. The water should be considered as unsafe for drinking: t until,he source of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. The concentration of certain chemical or physical constituents exceeds acceptable limits. These are as follows: ❑ Other: loK PA� Y��•�Cr� 3�r,-f�' ll'''— (r.y ar._ �C ��"�' i. ;, •� •- t� nT�ON REPORT �' � LABORATORY NO. TOW NO. HYS MP ET t•i L.$1 REV. 12-74 1. Type or print one set and send to the address below. 8 ; /� i 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of 8 DATE IV 0 A E ORTED health or stole agencies. �� �7 �� �� �^f�. TO: Conn. State Dept. of Health; Laboratory Div., P.O. Box 15f14 Hartford, CT 06101 -77 NAM OF PRO a RTY(!Ih ;e sample w . taken) ADDRESS TOWN COLLECTION G REPORT: s lCf �. �' f3, �=:� {tom''' ..� r7.,;r{ y:. €CTED BY f.:ame) COLLECTOR' NO DATEC,OLLECTE.D TIME O LEG' ED SAMPL ING POINT fr t "A �.tn,z %Ind Address of person to receive Laboratory Report Well Semi-P blic Privete Identification: Nona 5iItered Chlorinated Softened } Treatment: _❑ ❑ ❑ J ' NAME OF B T AT! DE LAST EXAM DATE ?OF L EXAM-- ~ t- OPLIRTY OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS l�f different from name and address Wbola 'axon For Conformation to Lows Suspected of Causing Disease Other (specify or give details tore) n(specify) (G e Details) ❑ t ' Taste complaints Color Odor T a Sediment ooming ter(Specify) - f: ❑ r ❑ ❑ ❑' Ms, Of Constant Emergency DATEOF LAST USE CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFEC�TER QUALITY f p, ) e • Supply: ❑ :.vr i_ti,:.s�__- ..�••>•.�. ;+..• Source Of Drilib�li Driven Well Dug Well Spring Other(Specify) Wet er: El ❑ 11 ' WELL I;IEPTH WELL DIAMETER CONDITION O :CURB AND T?P SEAL OATEOF AST/ UMVN WORK INSY M Description Of Plater Source: t>(. / ..� Ft. �/ In. r''ossible source Septic Tank Farm Industry Other (Specify) I ;`S Y,ollutian: ❑ ❑ ❑ t j�l r `'.j .ley: �,v t , p_ciol Tests /4 $trttuircd: i /r'c h417L"L'jL.Ci •� Y�if 3' s/l�LG, �_.-'l'L C./.%�1. t.ociitionai Description If Needed: tali. ✓in!.:y2, l ,.` i/ .�tr.G! (, �.-J't.ri✓�t.J N�' -- 41 DATE SENT 5;gnature y i t 1 t tel: ( ( f) f N f t a,d Title: ( i t ./ CJ•.t./1P ' `/.'!. ,t <trt ��VY a VLABORATORY EXAMINATION( REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Division) Note: Chemical results are in Mg/L. &; µRENT COLOR 1 TRUE COLOR ODOR TURBIDITY i .� NITRITE Sodium as No Magonese as Mn Qy^�a o ha O. oa.2. f'�C1 . ) GGl3S3 c NITRATE Alkalinity as C00O3 Bicarbonate Fluoride os F it nitrogen ^ � I� J j / nstituents V as AMMONIA Alkalinity as C00O3 Carbonate Detergent as ABS ! / 'filirrogan (N) < U. j ! 0. C. i ALBUMINOID Total Hardness as C00O3 Sulfate as SO4 Hydrogen-inn Concentration (pH). hiorides as Cl Iron as Fe MEMBRANE FILTER TEST n `h Q 0• G Co}iform Colonies/100ML. V CONCLUSIONS:The results of the analysis of this sample- Nte- t Ilic requirements for apotable water. I Sfce: the requirements for a potable water; however, the chemical or physical con:cituents listed below appear abnormally high for a ground supply. The H.u.-r ,could be Suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents is a potentially harttuul one. A. C. DAUB_ Ihl not ricer the requirements for a potable ware.because: "ll,e colifom-,density exceeds acceptable limits. 'Be presence of the coliform group,while not necessarily meaning that disease producing organisms arc present, does indicate that such contamination might reach the supply to the same extent. The water should be considered as+in safe for drinking until the sour-cc of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. 'Ilse conccntration of certain chemical or physical constituents exceeds eptable I* its. The a e as follows: z Nvav,-6Z5 : ��Jr cc• �'r b a.r...S . �"��t.. ,��7�"_ 7`'�C-{ � �'f'`''►�- �c��tt�._� � - D. / O I� C, ;%�J �t'dS�`iL. i Y MAR 15 7 .., � . 4n (per 0•� this Jectlon . Division Use � �; *XA,fiAtPlt�Tt01'1 REPORT L B R t1 Y .. PHYSICAL COMPLE t a,`_-ui RE A V. 12-74 1.Type or print one set and send to the address below. tt i ` 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of j 46 health or state agencies. DA E REPORTED O: Conn. Stete Dept. of Health, Laboratory Div., P.O. Box 1689 Hartford, CT 06101 t ,3-'f 4, '7 COLLECTION LECTION oft i r ME PROPER T Y(i'hwi; .sample µfirs taken) ADDRESS rowNt 5 F <, 1 REPORT: ~��.� ,. 's. �.•f._.i^f �.+.5�. ,,d•i',.f{a•� .".; .�" .. �'�/,.[�+.d� �f�,.4�. - � a..-'t..3+•a""' d/!.�-�l�r.� •.�:.r,[f"* 3 TFU EY (Nanwi COLLECTOR'SNO� DATE COLLECTED TIME COLLECT D SAMPLING 1 f M. a:nc and Address of person 4to receive Laboratory Report Well Semi-P blic Private 71 Identificotton: ( D }� r r ! Treatment None Filtered 'Chlorinoted Softened'' iSpecaty El Ej i } • NAME Or LAS THAT AQ.E LAST XAM DATE OF EJf M KT:—0 F7 TR.TY OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS(it different from natne and address above) / I - i )Sere kra at: For Conformatto to Laws Suspected of Causing Disease Other (Specify or give details ere) i t (Specify) ❑(Give Details) a t Cot npf tints Color Odor Taste Sediment Foaming Other(specify) t �. ,. - El ❑ ❑ se Of Con stant Emergency DATE OF LAST USE CONDITIONS THAT MAY/f FFECT WATER QUA TY(Specify) Drilled Wall Driven WelI Dug Well Sprag Other(SAecuy) otcr: ! i t WE'LL DEPTH; WELL DIAMETER ICONDITiO pF CURB AN TOP SEA DATE OF LA IT PLUMBINGO wRR54SYSTEM 3a-cription Of s IcIter 5,c,ce: _ r1 Ft. _ In. :�"l)it• s�-t Septic Tank . Form Industry Other (Specify) ass:o,e Source r) , -11 P, I ution: L__) "vquirl Tests : t;Ud a. r'fvi t V. d � r r ..l�r':' r.:•�. -1 ....J .1� ;Gr` - �•-+j�•:• -�,._!. ' ,.. sciditicnol Description If Needy: sJna t,,re. J.l itd Title: - LABORATORY EXAMINATION REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Division) Note: Chemico'111results are in Mg/L. �i'1RE:NT COLOR - TRUE COLOR` ODOR TURBIDITY. - - -- NITRITE Sodium as No Moganese as Mn Nitrogen NITRATE/ Alkalinity as Ca-0O3 Bicarbonate Fluoride as F .c•nsiituents ` • 7� �1?J�.. eY3! t T'`� c:, AMMONIA Alkalinity as C00O3 Carbonate Detergent as ABS Nitrogen (N) < {✓ C:. , & ALBUMINOID Total Hardness as C,00O3 Sulfate as SO4 Hydrogen-ion Concentration (pH) hior ;les os Cl Iron as Fe MEMBRANE FILTER TEST Q. Coliform Colortiesl100ML. CONCLUSIONS:The results of the analysis of this sample. i \feet tat,requirements for a potable w•atcr. I Mt c: rttc requirements for a potable, -water; however, the chemical or physical constituents listed below appear al=rm®liy `high for a ground supply. The - n.trt r should be suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents is a potentially harmful one.' A. C. DAB ; -1± t:ot meet the requirements for a potable water because; B •0 flue c0lifo--31 density exceeds acceptable limits. The presence of the coliform group, %•bile not necessarily meaning chat disease producing organismsl are prc:;ent, does indicate that such contamination might reach the supply to the same ektent. The water should be considered as unsafe for drinking'! until the source of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. I �11te concentration of certain chemical or physical constituents exceeds acceptable limits. These are as follows: �ilthor: �/lYrdY •J3 �t *' ��► " a �' MAR 151977 1 _ ;AAM$`N TION REPORT 844T This Section for Lab. Division Use 12_74 1.Type or print one set and send to the address below. L -{g'>_ No. TOlW? Fit Ep �E 2.Reports will be furnished only to local director of health or state agencies. DATE RE TO: Conn. State Dept. of Health, Laboratory Div., P.O. Box 1689 Hartford, CT 06101 3-18-7? gi" h 31eo� NAM RO Y(Wh etsample wa taken) ADDRESS COLLECTION TOWN f REPORT: l + LkT_TL0 tiY(\'ame, ii L •_ �L ✓ <' Z3- J t f f/ COLLE T R N A COL L CT�E{D + E OLLE/C1TED SAMPLING OIIN n �-7' � "" `J// •M. / �L3�!` _.�1d�C/71✓_:.tme and Address o person to receive Laboratory Report ¢ Well Semi-Public . Private Identification:' _ Nona Filtered Chlorinated Softened Treatment Q [—� �-•" .�,,_. •� �� Other(Specifyj "__-1._1 ....»......»__»..�---j_ JNAME OF •AB HA MADE LAST-EXAMI OAT LAST-EX-AM ^70 ER i Y OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS(11 diff i at from name and addre a above) _..-_-- '�.'t'i' ;~'�.i: ,� J-�a��-•C-r"w ..•� / =� / + � � .,«�fe} ,' '.�. 7 "T..• ..a /. Fold lseasan For Conformation'to-Lows Suspected of Causing Disease Other (specify or give details here -- -� Here- xaminoTion: �(Specity) �k(GiveDetails) ❑ Complaints Color Odar TQste Sediment Eoaminq Ot er(specify) } S1sr. Of Constant Emer ency ORTEOF LAST USE CONOI7IONS THAT MAY AFFECT ATER QUALITY{$psaify) ,pply. _ ,rce Of Drilled Driven Well Dug Well Spring Other (specify) . .___ a+e�: _ a F ❑ 5cription Of WELL DEPTH WELL DIAMETER CONOITION OF CttgB AND TOP SEAL DATE OF LAST PLUMBING ORK IN SYSTEM, :ter Source: \, Ft. In. ( yssible Source 5eptiTank Form Industry Other (Specify) Pollution: e:eial Tests i quired: 1 ..;itional Description If Neededt _ .____._ -,=i.. l -. ..';, ... 2:.*'(,i..Z' '!- C:._s-,.. -Z t: -s,._ -I a _� {�•'`. it c:`.'.' ,+,..'- �`r'Y�a /.;5..i.: :.i �:+ .• atu re y i Title. DAfiE SENT'�"� 7 -- / i._+"ram.r : ✓ Cf; 37✓ .AB( RATORY EXAMINATION REPORT: (To be filled out by Laboratory Division) r Note: Chemical results era in Mg/L. ARENT COLoR TRUE COLOR ODOR TUR9IDlTY I '` lv D ;t , NITRITE So�diuy' as No 1 Maganese as Mn (�. C� C: Z 1/ 1l� C';�t c C.t.t ;titre, en NITRATE Alkalinity as C00O3 Bicarbonate Fluoride as F -:stituents1~ as AMMONIA Alkalinity as CaCOg Carbonate. Detergent as ABS �r�rj yc�� ogre (N) // Lt ALBJ`AiN01D Total Hardness as CoCO3 Sulfate s SOa Hydrogen-ion Concentration (pH) i::JCS as C1 - Iron as Fe { " MEMBRANE FILTER TEST Coliform Colonies/100ML. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis of this sample. Nice, the requirements for a potable water 1 tr tlae requirements for a potable water; however, the chemic d or physical constituents listed belArer ow appear abnormal[ high for a 11 � st=oil nc> suspect if local conditions indicate that the source of these constituents is a potentially harmful one, y F ground supply. T1se '. •lot meet uac-req;airements for a potable water because: i_l 111c coliiorm density exceeds acceptable limits. The presence of the coliform group, while not necessarily meaning that disease producing`orgatiisms: ire present, Joe i indicate that such contamination might reach the supply to the sane extent. The water should be considered as unsafe for drinking i antil the source of this bacterial contamination can be located and removed. 1 111c.- concentration of certain chemical or physical`constituents exceeds ai it a aTk i rr-;s� i:T[-4 I. �-'i>1`�l jr C��c-�.'� .2t %V y N. 't L F e 6j>L, {�Y :. I Ilk'on SA - _ c�• ,�s f �, � ��b Vie' 4e.#- M-I"Mmr-1!20 r� iC � 7 R, #I . TSK W MR --! )i � -�-j7-''S" e'v .S �S y ';' `� LS RF{ 'S` 4.t•'.tc,�� Gt .� F' I� - �� 3. � §:.3����� "a,.. .a•s�.��' �`-P-w�� rt�s� ��� : ��,{ � L� r r ��.c._ •c.r r•q r 1 ;�. ��F - c;f.C- F � ,� i�'Fa-Sti fiz i r �kh ¢e $t f �` 3, 'l�} s� �v5 �'-as. 4 * `x''°# F- `�gsk�sx'".��f ;-.� i4`sa•' F 'a rS' t •` �("'x .� r vju. R Ci+i 7 3'�t 3v u `Y`s'3 l� ®R� 2 �� - � � ,S f Set -Y� ��py � - >$. ��,{� 'k¢r�.q� } � rr :^Sa• AP at - S 3N r 3t'.s �a• � - S -7 4..k;. �l6 k iry i. e+. e k W._-ss IG -fu jv ��gl -? � F ����� � •i l�'a' �3 �Y s Arr2�4 ���,' �C.2 � o-",g�� pi Sh i s; „e ��� t'� i .ti fi R � � �� r �* e Y- '��a ��,ti �� � �i¢1���'t$"�i.`"3� ����•2r1t�r ''fir��,y,'� k:. 7 z,.�� x b i NS s 'A z t,>f�x c �'`' 4 et •�F�'� S' Y �.1:�S.;A+� -3� :� �n>''v-ti'sSr .. { R+" S .�+j t'� ;. - � ti iyt�> .iti+Y � Yr t 'i.3(ti#'°+ `� - .• _y4�: s u-,� < a° d `�, f � -. •� �� 'ter- p �Z, � „• M- v d sm c.0 MEMORANDUM March 27, 1978 To: Allan S. Young Re: Jurgelas Claim - Chapel. Road I visited the subject site and observed the following: Chapel .Road at this point is straight. There are no curves, and no special plowing problems. This area of Chapel Road is and has been plowed as any other street in Town; that is, the plow is lowered to the pavement and the vehicle moves along the street uninterrupted from one end to the other. There is no negligence in the way the street is plowed. Further observation shows the land immediately west of this house is substantially higher than the house allowing overland flow of surface water in its direction. There is also a drainage structure approximately six feet off the road and west of the house lot. On the day I checked this site - March 20, 1978 - water was flowing easterly along the north gutter line and into this drainage structure. Storm Jerry, which dumped 13" of snow over a two-day period, occurred on January 20th and 21st. Drifting and icing conditions continued for an additional two days. The build-up of plowed snow along the street gutters should have contained any water on the street. The driveway at this location pitches downward from the road. Storm water could flow down this driveway if the volume were substantial enough. I received your memo and the attached claim March 15, 1978. I had not been aware of any abnormal accumulation of water on Chapel Road and am unable to supply first-hand knowledge of the subject com- plaint. If this is to be pursued further, perhaps the Engineering Depart- ment should make a topographic survey at this location. E f Melvin C. Stead, Acting Superintendent of Streets MCS/ml TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN HALL SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 :- 19�B �5 F . TO Allan Young DATE March 9, 1978 Director -of Public Works SUBJECT: Agnes Jurgelas-178 Chapel Road .FOLD- - Claim for damages Please comment on the attached. BY Paul F. Talbot • March 3, 1978 i. g-` Mr. Paul Talbut, Town Manager `Z r �`�y� ✓ Town of South Windsor f w 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 MAR 7 1978 Mr. Charles Enes, Town Clerk Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue _ ! South-Windsor, Connecticut 06074ta / Dear Sirs: � . Re: Agnes Jurgelas 178 Chapel Road I South Windsor, Connecticut This is to notify you that Agnes Jurgelas makes a claim for damages against the Town of South Windsor based on its failure to take reasonable precautions to prevent the accumulation of a large body of water on her �! property which destroyed the foundation of her home located as above. Date of Occurrence: January 25, 1978. and subsequent dates. �! Cause of Occurrence: The accumulation of water on her property because the Town of South Windsor, and its agents and servants, caused or allowed snow to pile up preventing water running along Chapel Road from entering a brook If nearby and, in addition thereto, causing- a culvert situated !; property to be overfilled and bubbling water onto her driveway,andnagainstr her home. The foundation and the footing as well have been destroyed in. large measure. Agnes Jurgelas hereby makes a claim against the Town of South Windsor for all the damages resulting from its negligence, misfeasance and nonfeasance= ii in allowing the water to accumulate. ff i If . The damages are estimated to be about Three Thousand Five.Hundred ii ($3,500.00) Dollars and she looks forward to the Town of South Windsor for payment thereof. Very truly yours, AGNES JURGELAS ' if ! BY Maurice R.• Gersten Her Attorney of Gersten. & Gersten 234 Pearl Street j Hartford, Connecticut 06103 �+ CERTIFIED MAIL: If RETUP-N RECEIPT REQUESTED fi it C °� REGIp cag CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVER MENTS97 ELM STREET— HARTFORD, CONN. 06106 Tel. 203 522-2217 ANMENTS DANA S. HANSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR December 9, 1977 Mr. Harold F. Heintz Deputy Commissioner Conn. Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Commissioner Heintz: Attached is a revised proposal for "Advanced Preliminary Engineering" for your review. This revised proposal- is the result of a meeting with members of your staff and RMA. We view the activities to be undertaken by this proposal as representing approxi- mately 25% of the preliminary engineering phase of most of the Interstae Trade-In projects presently proposed. Examples of specific projects we would initially undertake to evaluate include: 1) East Hartford - Reconstruct Tolland Street - Burnside Avenue to the Manchester Town Line. 2) Manchester - Reconstruction of Vernon Street - Lydall Street to Vernon Town Line. 3) South Windsor - Reconstruction — Chanel Road, 4) Wethersfield - Pedestrian Ramps - Various Locations. 5) Windsor - Widen and reconstruct Day Hill Road - Prospect Hill Road easterly 9060+. A VOLUNTARY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FORMED TO INITIATE AND IMPLEMENT REGIONAL PROGRAMS OF BENEFIT TO THE TOWNS AND THE REGION. As we have mentioned in previous correspondence, anticapted funding for this project would be 70% federal and 300 local. We would greatly appreciate your comments on this material at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, / Francis P. AkMahon Senior Transportation Planner /mh Enc. cc: Donato Altobelli Mayor Richard Blackstone Oo ul Talbot Robert .-Weiss Cynthia Matthews Albert Ilg ADVANCED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (APE) ' Objective: To assist the towns of the Capitol Region with the various engineering aspects of projects to be implemented using Interstate Trade-In funds. Methodology: CRCOG staff will prepare an engineering evaluation of proposed projects in this category. Upon completion of this evaluation, preliminary plans will be prepared showing proposed solutions to the problems defined in the engineering evaluation and cost estimates of each. These plans will be at a scale (20 or 40) suitable for review by local boards and commissions as well as state and federal agencies. The specifc areas to be studied and plan detail to be provided shall include: A) Traffic Counts - Staff will collect and reduce pedestrian and vehicular traffic volume data as required (peak hour, ADT) . This data will then be analyzed to determine capacity of the existing system. Projection of future volumes will be made for various alternate proposals and related to the system capacity, i.e. one way systems, turn prohibitions, pedestrian volumes, etc. B) Accident Analysis - Staff will collect and analyze accident data, (latest three years). Specific recommendations will be made to improve safety in areas found to be deficient. C) Parking Regulations - Existing parking regulations will be compiled. In addition to this,on and off street parking data will be collected and analyzed. Recommendations will be made concerning changes necessary in existing regulations to implement proposed improvements, and the impact of these on surrounding properties. D) Transit Service - An analysis of existing transit service will be made. Recommendations for improvements such as bus shelters, turnouts, bus stop adjustments to facilitate traffic flow, etc. will be the output of this activity. E) Environmental Impact - Staff will work with DEP to access the impact of the proposed project on air and water quality. Recommendations will be made concerning specific areas to reduce adverse impacts. F) Town standard specifications will be reviewed and areas of conflict with Form 811 will be outlined. This will allow for an early determination of what materials will be specified. G) Typical cross sections will be developed incorporating the above-mentioned specifications. AM • - 2 - H) ROW - Existing ROW information will be incorporated in the plans to be prepared. This data will greatly assist in determining feasible alternates and specific impacts of various plans. Where applicable potential sites for replacement parking will be investigated. I) Speed and delay studies will be conducted, where appropriate, to define areas of congestion. This data will then be analyzed to determine the cause of this congestion (i.e. , outdated signal equipment, lack of capacity, substandard geometry, etc.) and recommended improvements. K) An inventory of traffic control devices (signing, signal equipment, pavement markings) will be prepared and evaluated. Q Other activities related to specific aspects of invididual projects. Products: A "Preliminary Evaluation Report" will be prepared presenting the various inventory data, evaluations of these data and recommended improvements. This report will be circulated for review and comment by appropriate officials and the public. MEMORANDUM September 9, 1976 To: Allan S. Young Director of Public Works Re: Industrial Area of Chapel Road This memorandum is to bring you up to date on the developments on the Chapel Road well problems. To date, we have found three (3) wells contaminated in the Chapel Road area. A lab report from the State Health Department revealed a count of 1 mg/l of Carbon Tetrachloride, or some closely related substance. This sample was removed from the Nielsen Brothers Plant. We are cooperating with DEP officials in a survey of all the wells in the area. In a very cursory inspection on September 8, we found numerous health code violations, such as--crank case oil being discharged onto the ground; soluable oil used for cooling in machine shops was being discharged onto the ground; chlorinated hydrocarbons stored in 55 gal. drums which were rusting out and leaching into the soil. These solvents are transported by rail sometimes, and it is apparent that spills have occurred in transfer, in the past. As you are aware, we have no Director of Health. This puts us in a compromising position. Although DEP is aware of this, they are not exactly sure what jurisdiction they have in these matters. I feel it is my duty to inform those citizens involved of the likely health problems; however, I have no wish to start a panic in the residential sector. Frank J. Smith Superintendent FJS:prb Saws. Seq` - T1Sw'q-?- 0-/? �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 Cora AREA CODE 203/644-2511 Public Works April 21, 1976 Mrs. Barbara S. Borzage 503 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mrs. Borzage: This letter will respond to your correspondence regarding an underground water problem at 503 Chapel Road. The Bureau of Engineering has reviewed, in detail, the situation as it currently exists, and has determined that the sewer construc- tion on Chapel Road could have produced no negative affect on underground water conditions in the immediate area It is, therefore, my opinion that this condition is clearly a private matter and is the sole responsibility of the landowner, requiring no involvement on the part of .the Town of South Windsor. Very truly yours, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Allan SAllang Director f Public Works ASY:prb CC: Charles Enes, Acting Town Manager Melvin C. Stead, Jr. James Throwe Memo from TERRY V. SPRENKEL TOWN MANAGER SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 April 12, 1976 Allan: Would you review this matter with Mel Stead. There is a file of correspondence regarding this matter you might want to review. Thank you! Terry February 20, 1976 Director of Public Works Town Hall Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Sir: Re : Underground Water Problem I reside at 503 Chapel Road, South Windsor, Connecticut.. I had this house built in 1960; at the time of building no underground water appeared and the Building Department recommended that foundation drainage tile would be a waste of money. I have never had any basement wat-er until the Town installed the Sewerage System. Since then, I have had to install a perimeter foundation drainage the system with a pump due to water coming into my basement. The water flowing to the pump utilizes 2 inches of a 4 inch pipe . The pump must run continuous for 8 months of the year to keep water from coming into my basement. The Town also is draining water from Chapel Road into my yard. The water flow is increasing rapidly during and after every rain and I now have two pumps running together to keep the water level down. Please resolve this problem due to the Town Sewerage System causing it. Also, please notify me as to what corrective action the Town is. taking to resolve this problem. Sincerely, Mrs. Barbara S . Borzage 503 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut c c: LO -,Town Manager Town Engineer 'l RECEIVED a FEB 241976 2 Town of South Windsor 9 ti �, February 20, 1976 Director of Public Works Town Hall Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Sir: Re : Under gr d Water Problem I reside at 503 Chape oad, South Windsor, Connecticut. I had this hous bui in 1960; at the time of building no underground water appeared and the Building Department recommended that foundation drainage the would be a waste of money. I have never had any basement water until the Town installed the Sewerage System. Since then, I have had to install a perimeter foundation drainage the system with a pump due to water coming into my basement. The .water flowing to the pump utilizes 2 inches of a 4 inch pipe . The pump must run continuous for 8 months of the year to keep water from coming into my basement. The Town also is draining water from Chapel Road into my yard. . The water flow is increasing rapidly during and after every rain and I now have two pumps running together to keep the water level down. Please resolve .this problem due to the Town Sewerage System causing it. Also, please notify me as to what corrective action the Town is taking to resolve this problem. Sincerely, Mrs. Barbara S . Borzage 503 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut cc : Town Manager. °" 'own Engineer its 1976 I r t S. �sgo South ear, Cceio 'Tb Y +, ?20-% a MMON W delay in responding to your Utter of Fe pertAining to -the undorpvund water problem Wit` have been � �, 1r home ikt- 503`C pel Ro4d� Our delay at I asked t at your l�,y due to the fact that I asked the Bangiue+ering Division to =Aertmke q thou An` ticn of the prcblam you Aarve been on- . cc��torimg..' The wg0Aweri4 report,° shiab I ,an enclosing for your review and :2ftlysis indid-ates that you s e riencin$ a. problem of ground water being recirculated on they prpperrty, There doeu riot 4par to be any support for the possibility that the instmnition,of. t6 s-adt try sewers are causing the ground water problem. old you` nve 3.ny questions regarding'the engineering report p3sum feel free to- contn Qt Mr. HteAd of the Souath�Windsor Engineering Division. Very truly yours, TOWN OF SOUTH WMCM Terry V. Sprenkol, Town MmIger encl. act Town Attorney Thomas Dennis Melvin Stead; Acting Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM March 1, 1976 To: Terry V. Sprenkel Re: Borzage Residence 503 Chapel Road Although it is true that Mrs. Borzage is having a water problem at 503 Chapel Road, I cannot connect this problem with the sanitary sewer system installed in the street. Ground water in the area is high and flows westerly from Long Hill Road. The surface contours indicate that a large low area exists to the rear of the Borzage home. This serves as a collection point for surface water which, in turn, enters the water table at that point. The sewer line in the street is at elevation 63.9. The elevation of the basement floor is approximately 64.5, and is somewhat higher than the sewer line. As you know, the sewer line has been bedded with suitable material.'and, therefore, is the path of least resistance. I believe that no ground water will flow southward toward the Borzage home through 50 feet of undisturbed soil due to the sewer installation, but rather, it would flow north and west to, and along, the sewer line. The reason for the volume of water being pumped is the installation of the foundation drainage tile that was installed as a perimeter drain. This drain is apparently functioning as it was intended to. It collects and concentrates the ground water around the foundation to a location where it can be pumped. This keeps seepage through the walls to a minimum. However, the ground contours indicate that the water being pumped out onto the surface is reentering the ground water table and is being recycled through the pump. There is no drainage in this area to carry the surface water off the site. Melvin C. Stead, Jr. MCS:prb April 5 , 1976 Mr. Terry V. Sprenkel Town Manager Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Mr. Sprenkel : In reply to your letter dated March 8, 1976 and Memorandum from Mr. Melvin C. Stead, Jr. , dated March 1, 19169 I cannot agree with Mr. Stead's report of the water problem at my house. It is fast that the sewer line runs north and west past my property. The perimeter foundation drainage the has been properly installed at the bottom of the foundation footings , at approximately elevation 63 .5 . The sewer elevation at 63 .9 is above the perimeter drainage tile, thereby, capable of draining into the perimeter drainage system. The suitable material the sewer line is embedded in is a path of least resistance, but has greatly increased the underground volume of water flowing past my house. The 50 feet of undisturbed soil now has much more volume of water to retain and is not able to do so. The fact that recently the Town had to install a storm drain manhole next to my driveway further indicates that water volume has increased. It is also possible that by installing the sewer system, an underground spring has been diverted, changing the flow or direction of the underground water. Mr. Stead indicates that in the rear of my house is an existing low area that collects water. This area has been there for many years . My pump is discharging the water into this area which is approximately 100 feet away from the house. I cannot believe that water can run uphill for 100 feet, to be recycled by the pump. I cannot understand how the Town can claim no responsibility for water coming into my basement when for over ten years the low water collection pond has been there, and I had no drainage system without any water in my basement, until the Town installed the sewer system. Since then, at great expense, I have had to install a perimeter drainage system and that the water flow keeps increasing. Nith all of the timely previous facts , it can only be determined that the Town sewerage system has created water in my basement. I feel the Town needs to make :a...more accurate survey of this problem and resolve the problem it created. Please advise me as to what corrective action the Town is taking to resolve this problem. Sincerely, /7 Mks. Barbara S . -B�orzage 503 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut cc -* Dennis, Town Attorney Stead, J. Throwe, Sewer Comm. MEMORANDUM March 1, 1976 i To: Terry V. Sprenkel Re Borzage Residence - 503 Chapel Road Although it is true that Mrs. Borzage is having a water problem at 503 Chapel Road, I cannot connect this problem with the sanitary sewer system installed in the street. Ground water in the area is high and flows westerly from Long Hill Road. The surface contours indicate that a large low area exists to the rear of the Borzage home. This serves as a collection point for surface water which, in turn, enters the water table at that point. The sewer line in the street is at elevation 63.9. The elevation of the basement floor is approximately 64.5, and is somewhat higher than the sewer line. As you know, the sewer line has been bedded with suitable material and, therefore, is the path of least resistance. I believe that no ground water will flow southward toward the Borzage home through 50 feet of undisturbed soil due to the sewer installation; but rather, it would flow north and west to, and along, the sewer line. The reason for the volume of water being pumped is the installation of the foundation drainage tile that was installed as a perimeter drain. This drain is apparently functioning as it was intended to. It collects and concentrates the ground water around the foundation to a location where it can be pumped. This keeps seepage through the walls to a minimum. However, the ground contours indicate that the water being pumped out onto the surface is reentering the ground water table and is being recycled through the pump. There is no drainage in this area to carry the surface water off the site. Melvin C. Stead, Jr. MCS:prb February 20, 1976 Director of Public Works Town Hall Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Sir: Re : Underground Water Problem I reside at 503 Chapel Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. I had this house built in 1960; at the time of building no underground water appeared and the Building Department recommended that foundation drainage the would be a waste of money. I have never had any basement water until the Town installed the Sewerage System. Since then, I have had to install a perimeter foundation drainage the system with a pump due to water coming into my basement. The water flowing to the pump utilizes 2 inches of a 4 inch pipe. The pump must run continuous for 8 months of the year to keep water from coming into my basement. The Town also is draining water from Chapel Road into my yard. The water flow is increasing rapidly during and after every rain and I now have two pumps running together to keep the water level down. Please resolve this problem due to the Town Sewerage System causing it. Also, please notify me as to what corrective action the Town is taking to resolve this problem. Sincerely, Mrs. Barbara S . Borzage 503 Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut cc: Town Manager Town Engineer MEMORAN D U M TO: Melvin Stead, Acting 'Dire(ztor of Public Works - Jules Page, Planning and Zoning Coordinator FROM: Terry V. Sprenkel, Town Manager , DATE: January 6, 1976 SUBJECT: MEETING WITH EDC MEMBERS AND BUSINESS OWNERS REGARDING ACCESS ROAD TO BUSINESSES SUCH AS PROPANE GAS AND DUNN BROTHERS, ETC. I am asking both of you to attend a meeting with members of the EDC and property owners served by the riglL--of-way mentioned above. The meeting will be at�;110:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 8, 1976 at Jerry Z's. The purpose of the meeting is to ascertain if a proper right-of-way can be obtained to meet Town specifications and if there is continued interest to involve the use of Town funds under the provisions of the Industrial Road Guidelines if there is assurance of adequate building construction. I hope I can also attend the meeting. You will be expected to provide technical assistance and possibly answer questions that may arise involving your area of responsibility. 0%4 aF44 O � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SID AREA CODE 203 f 644-2511 - Public Works July 25, 1975 Mr. Ralph Paolella, Vice President Quinnipiac Industrial Corporation 1883 Dixwell Avenue Hamden, Connecticut 06514 Dear Mr. Paolella I am enclosing a Map of the proposed drainage facility affecting your property, starting at Chapel Road and pro- ceeding northerly to the Podunk River. In your letter of May 5, 1975, you requested that you be provided with a proposal incorporating the required property and the contemplated purchase price. I suggest that the proposal" be provided to you simply in the form of a "Quit Claim Deed, " transferring to the Town of South Windsor your interests in the subject Easement area, together with the right-to-drain on your property, as shown on the enclosed Map. The "purchase price" that the Town has contemplated is., frankly,. a token figure (for instance, $1.00) , since it is felt that this drainage facility and the Town's invest- ment in its construction, will significantly benefit all abutting properties; and that this benefit would far exceed the value of the relatively small land area involved. The Town' s Attorney is presently preparing the necessary Deed for this land transfer,. and I shall forward it to you as soon as it is available. Very truly yours, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Emil W. Lucek Director of Public Works EWL:p rb cc: Terry V. Sprenkel Atty. Thomas Dennis Melvin C. Stead, Jr. Quinnipiac Industrial Corporation 1883 DIXWELL AVENUE • HAMDEN, CONNECTICUT 06514 • Telephone 288-1641 r May 5 , 1975 Mr. Melvin C. Stead, • J.r. Project and Design Engineer Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Conn. 06074 Dear Mr. Stead: I have your letter of April 1 regarding the acquisition of a right-of-way 50 feet in width and 540 feet in length across our property, as well as an Easement or right-to-drain from the northern end of the right-of-way to the Podunk River. /rj, tO 61 ,e ' J If you will kindly prepare a proposal incorporating the raluired property and . the contemplated purchase price for the: right-of-way and the Easement , and will forward sane to me, I will see that it is given prompt and due consideration. At that time I will be happy to arrange an appointment. Sincerely, I i Ralph Paolella' Vice President . QUINNIPIAC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION Sa � - 0 ° � MEMORANDUM April 30, 1975 To: Attar. Thomas Dennis Re: Chapel Road Storm Sewer Easement You shall shortly be receiving plans for the proposed storm sewer easement north of Chapel Road. There are, presently, funds available for the purchase of this land in the amount of $9,000, in Account #4023 of the Public Works Department. As custodian of this account, expenditure of these funds must be approved by me. These funds must be expended by June 1, 1975, per directive of the Town Comptroller. if I may be of further assistance, please feel free to call. " 1 W. Lucek EWL:prb -cc: Terry V. Sprenkel Ted Ellis VZad�-ot o-P SatdA - r 6 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 1- } ✓caH AREA CODE 203 644-2511 Sott•c�. Public Works April 10, 1975 Petersen & Hoffman 68 Temple Street Hartford, Connecticut Attention: Mr. Melvin C. Stead, Sr. Dear Mr. Stead: Re: Chapel Road Storm Sewer Easements Please consider this letter an authorization to proceed with the preparation of a Plan and Profile for a Proposed Storm Sewer Easement, running from Chapel Road, northerly, approximately 1, 100 feet. It is understood that your price shall be based on an hourly billing with an "up-set, " or "not-to-exceed" limit of $850. Very truly yours, TO'NN OF SOUTH I DSOR f �. s I i_ , Eiji l W. Luc ek Director of Public Works EWL:prb CC: Terry V. Sprenkel Atty. Thomas Dennis Melvin C. Stead, Jr. r,lp iw IIE Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Public Works May 28, 1974 Atty. John J. Reid Gordon, Muir and Fitzgerald 39 Lafayette Street Hartford, Connecticut Dear Attorney Reid: I have thoroughly checked our personal records and time-sheets- for the period on, .or after, December. 28, 1972 and find no - record of any repair work done to the stop sign to which you refer in your letter of March 13, 1974. Further, we find no record of any complaints received with regard to this stop sign. Please feel free to call if you have any further questions.. --- -Very truly yours, TOWN OF SOUTH WIND'-OR r - - Erkil W. Lucek'. Director of Public Works EWL:prb w M GORDON, MUIR AND FITZGERAL.D ATTORNEYS AT LAW 39 LAFAYETTE STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 - GEORGE MUIR MARY C. FITZGERALD TELEPHONE S25-5361 STEPHEN M.RILEY WILLIAM S.GORDON,JR. EDWARD J. FOLEY - 1946-1956 PETER C.SCHWARTZ JOHN J. REID JOHN H.GOODRICH,JR. PHILIP N.ANDERSON March 13, 1974 Our File A7376 Department of Public Works Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut Re: Aldo Prario VS. Robert W. Lehrer Dear Sir: We represent Robert W. Lehrer in a civil lawsuit which has been instituted against him by Aldo Prario. The lawsuit arises out of an automobile accident which occurred at the intersection of Chapel Road and Long Hill Road in South Windsor on December 28, 1972 at approximately 5 p.m. One of the issues in the lawsuit involves the condition of the stop sign on Chapel Road at the intersection governing. traffic travelling in a westerly direction on Chapel Road. It is claimed that the stop sign had been bent at an angle which made it quite difficult to see in the darkness hours for traffic proceeding westerly on Chapel Road. We would appreciate your checking your records to determine whether you have any information regarding this claim that the stop sign was bent at the time, such as whether your records indicate that any complaints were received shortly before or at any time subsequent to December 28, 1972 regard- ing the sign or whether any repairs were made to the sign subsequent to December 28, 1972. i Department of Public -2- March 13, 1974 Works By copy of this letter, we are requesting the South Windsor Police Department for any information they may have in regard to this. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours , HN J. REID JJR/sal CC : South Windsor Police Department v Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 April 18, 1974 Mr. Emil Lucek Director of Public Works Town of South Windsor South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Emil: Please look into the sewer assessment charge for South Windsor property owners who will be serviced by the sewer line proposed to be built by the Town of Manchester on Deming Street, Baldwin Road and some adjacent streets. It seems unfair that South Windsor residents shoild have to pay Manchester charges for sewer lines in South Windsor. Please review with Tom, -Dennis our agreement with Manchester and be prepared to report at the next meeting of the Sewer Commission. Very truly yours, imes H. Throwe Chairman South Windsor Sewer Commission JHT/brs CC: Thomas G. Dennis, Town's Attorney