Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1725-39 Ellington Road TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Commission will officially receive applications Application No . ��f at either Special or Regular meetings provided they Received Date : _�� � were submitted to the Commission Chairperson, Secretary Ction or Public Hearing by : or agent, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the meeting at which they will be officially received. No application officially received at a Special Meeting eceipt No . will be acted upon at that meeting. APPLICANT: k/p/��_�SrC- � 11ra 7—,,c-_ ADDRESS : 1741V TELEPHONE OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : k' ( YfO�^d ADDRESS : ��/ F/Ilno gc 'St d), nl� idi COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 11!Jp LL241ec 0-aracorn /1 RC'CtIGn'4 6zd' �IYI� ���finJ�s n ��,7 >«�iq�r,J Orh �� � �i(d. • d �SrXrP�r �cs _ '�O�% :��_S _�`�n ZONE 12c- NAME, ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED : Pr LEPHONE THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING) APR 1 . Zone Change to (public hearingSO IjJA�ioagr Planning & Zoning Commission 2 . Filing for Subdivision 3 . Filing -for Open Space Subdivision (public hearing required) X �4 . Filing for Resubdivision (public hearing required) 5 . Special Exception to Article (public hearing required) J 6 . Site Plan of Development 5� 7 . Removal of Sand , Gravel , Clay or Quarry Stone & Ore (public hearing required) 8 . Other (explain in detail) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED WITH 6 SETS OF PLANS ( 7 sets if public hearing is required) BEFOR I�T/ IS RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING & ZON11 G COMM11SS/ION. X;1111t-;z Applicant Owner "'7 12 /84 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER - RSK 1) . The shopping center site is just under 12 acres and has 380 feet of frontage on Ellington Road. The site is zoned RC and is completely surrounded by RC zone , including land across Ellington Road, with the exception of Church ' s Community Center. The proposed use is a permitted use in this zone . 2 ) . The architecture is quite compatible with recent development in the Wapping Center area, and is in fact very attractive for an outdoor shopping center of this type . 3) . The applicant has indicated his desire to exercize signage control within the shopping center , and has included proposed facade signs on the architectural elevations . The Planning Department feels very strongly that signage should be designed with restraint and with a careful eye toward continuing the attractive appearance which char- acterizes the Wapping Center area. The applicant is aware that he is permitted either one 12 s . f. free standing sign for the center or facade signs but must seek a variance to erect both, or to erect a larger free standing sign. 4) Traffic concerns for this site involve difficult turning movements onto both Buckland Road and Ellington Road. The applicant' s traffic report seems to accurately present the problems of congestion at the 5 corner ' s and the turning movement difficulties which would be ex- perienced as a result of this site development. The Ellington Road entrance to the shopping center is directly across from one entrance to Colonial Cornere, and a traffic signal at this entrance as;proposed would ensure that vehicles are generally able to enter and exit the site safely. Coodination of the two signal lights is critical . This traffic signal is of course, subject to approval by Conn. DOT. Should the signal not be approved by DOT, left turns onto Ellington Road will be extremely difficult (if not impos- sible) during much of the PM peak hour, and will be hazardous at best. We could use more information on the anticipated effects of a traffic light at that location, given the nature of the existing queing problems. The Buckland Road entrance, which will be shared with Burger King if approved, will be subject to difficult left turn movements at PM peak hour. In all likelihood, vehicles would exit the shopping center at the traffic signal on Ellington Road during traffic peak hours . The applicant has proposed a slight widening of Buckland Road northbound to provide a left turn queing lane for vehicles entering the site from northbound Buckland Road. The Town has already acknowledged that a serious traffic situation exists at the 5 Corners intersection and is currently in the process of addres- sing a solution through improvements to the intersection and Buckland Road. In the interim, the adequacy of safety measures proposed by the applicant to mitigate hazardous movements must be evaluated by the commission, but even moreso, the State D.O.T. has jurisdiction over this matter, and indeed has final say over all external traffic improve- ments. TOWN SHOPPING CENTER - RSK Page 2 5) . Internal traffic circulation appears to be adequate , with the exception that all parking spaces directly in front of the proposed building should be relocated to create a fire lane. Police Chief Ryan and Fire Marshall Bill Lanning concur with this , and the applicant has already agreed to relocate the spaces. Traffic control markings and signage are indicated on the plans where needed. 6) . A minimum of 400 parking spaces are required for retail buildings of greater than 50 , 000 s. f. , or six spaces for each 1 ,000 s. f. The ap- plicant is proposing 307 spaces and is requesting a waiver for 93 spaces. It is the applicant' s responsibility to justify the parking waiver. 7) . Landscaping plans are very well prepared and the end result should be quite attractive. The plans include about 18 Oak, Red Maple and Sycamore trees on the south side of the site in partial replacement for trees which have been removed from the site. There are over a hundred trees included in the planting plan, many of which are 13 ' -15 ' in height at time of planting. 8) . There is a very small amount of regulated wetlands on the site, adjacent to Ellington Road. The rest of the site is free of wetlands and is one of very few commercially zoned sites which does not have wetlands limitations. The application is scheduled to be heard at the June IWA/CC meeting. 9) . The applicant has made most of the modifications requested by the Planning Department, with the exception of the removal of parking spaces in front of the building. This should be addressed on the final plans. 10) . SUMMARY: a) . The architecture is very pleasing and in character with the area. b) . Sign control is very important to the appearance of the final project; c) . Traffic concerns, i.e. safe entering and exiting of vehicles , is of primary concern to this application; d) . Landscaping looks outstanding . V J. F page 2 quick resolve, and that the decision will be made some time this year. �N ew Business A. Promotional Brochure : %Ir. Shemo has spoken to several companies for layouts and designs. i-'r. Lon King of South "Jindsor may possibly donate his time. Review of ',Viapping Center Development Proposal- Atty . Sol Kerensky: Chairman Brill continued the meeting by intro- . �. ducing Attorney Sol Kerensky to the commission, who ;ave a presentation to the commission on "The Crossroads" , a planned blend of residential with retail/commercial. This would be built on an area of 13.6 acres in the geographical center of town , near the °lapping five corners. He explained that the area was first ear-marked for a shopping center, but that this had been reconsidered. He introduced Greg 'clontana to the commission, who proceeded to show the approximate layout of the site. FIr. Mlontana explained that 28 ,000 sq. ft. would be retail , 6 ,800 sq. ft. commercial, with 12,000 sq. ft . office and 50 to 60 units of adult housing or condiminiu.,.s. He added that Peter DeMallie and John Shemo had stipulated that the multi-family units be either of the luxurious type , or housing for the elderly . He added that a zone change or variance , an "rc" zone , for over 10 acres would be needed. ?fir. Robert .smith addressed the commission , asking if the commission felt that this plan would make good use of the center of town. Discussion followed. ',Ir. Salerno told the commission that he has seen a lot of"mixed use"around the country , and likes the concept. Mr. Shemo added that he wants at least 30 ,000 sq. ft. to be used -as retail , as the property is commercially zoned now. He also feels that the housing should be more luxurious than any .hing that we have to date in South 'Nindsor. 'fir. Salerno moved that the commission be in favor of the concept as a mul-ti7!_use resident- ial/commercial project. '.Ir. ;:oriarty seconded the .motion , :"rhich was passed. As an amendment , L%Ir. Brill moved that the commission would recommend that the housing not be government subsidized or low cost , and should be upscale in nature. The motion was seconded and passed. Public Participation: None page 3 Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9 :30 p.m. Subm tted b Kenneth Brill, Chairman KB: ccp J s 40 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•c0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 4, 1984 Mr. Richard J. Sartor, Town Manager South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Sartor: At a Regular Meeting of the South Windsor Town Council held December 3, 1984, the following Resolution was approved: BE IT RESOLVED that the South Windsor Town Council hereby authorizes the Town Manager Richard J. Sartor to enter into an Agreement with Bronson and Hutensky, et al, developers of the Proposed Winchester Mall, to accept monies and other valuable consideration to be used to complete off—site improvements deemed necessary by the Town to the Proposed Winchester Mall Development, said Agreement to be conditional on all necessary approvals being obtained by the developer. Sincerely, Eileen G. Jalet Clerk of the Counci egj cc: Mr. Jeffrey G. Maguire Tyler Cooper & Alcorn �So,MN sF1<� e � .a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 R. 0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 May 28, 1986 Mr. Richard S. Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor , Ct. 06074 Dear Dick: Re: App. #1147 - Site Plan of Development Town Shopping Center Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on May 27th to accept the 65 day extension of time you granted in which to act in the above matter. The extension is from June 27th to August 31st. Yours very truly, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 1 vg By: Robert F. Gilligan, C airman - '*,oF F?5K KELLCGINC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 203-644-8761 / 644-8140 May 15, 1986 n,�AY 20 1986 South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission TO: Town of South- Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission RSK-Kellco, Inc. hereby grants the Planning and Zoning Com- mission an extension of sixty-five (65) days in which to act on the application for the Town Center shopping complex per your verbal request on May 13, 1986. We understand the extension is to commence on May 29, 1986, and end August 2, 1986. S' ely, (F y 1 �_o C� , Richard S. Kelleyi� ,. of . 40 We Build Our Reputation 1 OwN SE,( 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �►oSoR-co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 23, 1986 RSK Contractors Inc. �i CERTIFIED MAIL 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, Ct 06074Q -1 �J Attn: Richard Kelley J RE: Application #391 - Corner of Ellington Road and Buckland Road behind Society for Savings - Construction of s shopping area. Dear Mr. Kelley: At the June 16 , 1986 meeting , the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission approved with conditions , application #391 . The following conditions must be adhered to for this permit to be valid. 1 . Deputy Town Engineer ' s comments to be incorporated in plans . 2 . Sediment and Erosion Control notes to be adjusted in regards to the construction sequence and seeding to meet Town Engineer ' s approval . 3 . No work can commence prior to receipt of documentation showing down stream drainage rights to drain into abutting property. 4 . Plans must be ' revised adding trees in open area. 5. Plans to be modified to show grading to stop 10 feet from the property line along the west end of the lot. 6 . We recommend a bond in the amount of $15 , 000 be submitted to Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures . 7 . Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. -2- TO: Richard Kelley June 23 , 1986 RE: Application 4391 - Shopping area 8 . The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use . 9 . The permit is valid for one year and shall expire June 16 , 1987 . Very truly yours , John M. Moran, Jr. , Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission Town of South Windsor JMM:dlb CC: A. B. Davies , Deputy Town Engineer Richard Martel, Town Engineer Robert Gilligan, Planning & Zoning Commission Thomas D'Auria, Building Official Marcia Banach, Acting Director of Planning John Shemo, Economic Development Coordinator SOWN sE.4 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 8, 1986 RECEIVED ' Mr. Richard S. Kelley JUL. , I.W RSK-Kellco, Inc . 1744 Ellington Road WIND$QR South Windsor, Ct. 06074 PLANNING DEPT. Dear Sir: Re: App. #1147 - Site Plan of Development Town Shopping Center Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on July lst to deny, without prejudice, your application for a site plan of development for property located on the south side of Ellington Road, between Clark Street and Buckland Road, in an RC zone, because of the increased traffic it would generate on Ellington Road and the way traffic would exit onto Buckland Road. Before this site is developed the Commission feels a new traffic study should be done, and it highly recommends that an exit to another road be seriously considered. Yours very truly, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Robert F. Gilligan, Ch irman 1 CC: M. Banach, Acting Planning Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED STORCH ENGINEERS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. AUTHORIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II . SCOPE AND PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III . DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A. Site and Adjacent Roadway Descriptions 2 Figure 1 - Area Location Map . . . . . Following Page 2 Figure 2 - Site Location Map . . . . . Following Page 2 Figure 3 - Roadway Layout . . . . . . . Following Page 2 Figure 4 - Roadway Layout . . . . . . . Following Page 2 B. Roadway Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 V. TRAFFIC GENERATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1 - Trip Generation Estimates 4 VI . TRIP ASSIGNMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 VII. ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 VIII . RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. Buckl and Road . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 B. Ellington Road. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 APPENDIX I . ITE Generation Data II. Volume Counts III. Accident Data IV. Capacity Estimates STORGH ENGINEERS I. AUTHORIZATION The study has been authorized by Mr. Richard Kelley, President of RSK-Kellco Corporation, the developer of the proposed project. II. SCOPE AND PURPOSE The proposed study was undertaken to assess the potential of the proposed development of the Town Shopping Center and RWR Office Complex to impact traffic operations in the vicinity of Wapping Five Corners. The study was to address both interior traffic operations and on-site circulation. The Scope of the study included supplementing data acquired for the Burger King study as necessary and the conduct of manual and automatic traffic counts with observation of peak hour traffic patterns. III. DEFINITIONS In order to clarify the meaning of the certain specialized traffic engineering terms used in this Report, the following definitions are offered: Trip is a one-way movement to or from a site. One car entering and leaving a site constitutes two trips. Traffic Generation is the actual number of vehicle movements which may reasonably be expected to be attracted by a specific development. Usually, traffic generation is expressed as a number of trips. Average Weekday Traffic is the total traffic generation of a development on a typical working weekday. 1 STORGH ENGINEERS Peak Hour Generation is the maximum traffic generation which may be anticipated during the highest volume hour for the particular development. This analysis parameter may vary as to the time of day, depending on the type of facility proposed. Office building normally generate peak volume rates which coincide with the peak volume rates of the surrounding roadway network, fast food restaurants have peak traffic during the Noon hour. Trip Distribution is the process of determining the proportion of the generated trips that can be expected to originate at any location. Traffic Assignment is the process of assigning the trips which have been distributed from the various points of origin to the roadway system which would provide the most direct route between the points of origin and destination. Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) are terms utilized to describe the ability of a roadway to handle its traffic assignment. IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Site and Adjacent Roadway Descriptions The site of the proposed Shopping Center and Office Complex is located on two parcels of land adjacent to Wapping Five Corners. It is proposed that the Town Shopping Center has access drives to Buckland Road and Ellington Road (Route 30) . The RWR Office Complex would be served by drives to Ellington (Route 30) . The general location of the project is shown in Figure One with a site location map presented in Figure 2 and driveway locations shown for each development in Figure 3 (Town Center) and Figure 4 (RWR Office) . 2 a Ir' • i • 'w. . .fir � � • r Isom ..��-� � 1 ����. � • :. ,, -.= is 1i .���i1���r ki TOWN OFFICERWR • COMPLEX • - J AREA LOCATION MAP mo .1- J 7 i Q �S pD�p S�aC'�p Iv r 0°MD top qJ°D 04, l +; e r 8 i pq� 5`p,� Y[ q / / v D(C 4FIf Lp W O , rc` ~� l � o � 2 ¢ f •� (10 ¢ O a ELLMGT M ROAD v Dqk CghD 'I a e/ 0 a a � Oy *C)"FGQA i [r o SITE LOCATION pCM�hG 4 O9 BA�C 3 i f{ 0 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER RWR OFFICE COMPLEX SOUTH W+N-QSOR-, CT SCAM T.S. SITE LOCATION MAP ammo. - Cummm- fiff: lA STORCH N► r.►w srwaT rITtogg ENGPMEERS wcrwmWnol CT osw+ aw, wo. 2 ELLINGTON _ ROAD ti I o °I FFICE BUILDING I9 I C 5,000 S.F. I 0 I O I N I ._ r Ir I ° I W 1rQ Z SITE D W I U N C �� N I o � 0 10 I _Z 1. I a O PROPOSED BURGER KING I I a O_ ( BY OTHERS) 0 I 250�f _ I (D — co I 199.60. ICI I 101 o 1 v to I I N I 101.81 I M I N I � O N 240 02' -- 317.90 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER RWR OFFICE COMPLEX SOUTH W IN DSOR, CT SCALE: N.T.S. ROADWAY LAYOUT pRn Sy: A.J.K Ic"mcxQ MYTO SRCH N<1 rain STRUT rA;r. EN6F1rEEftS I wcT'»otsFcLa.CT Dews ors. Ro. 3 1 -- ELLINGTON ROAD 1 � EXISTING NOUf[ + O J N I m O I W O U N 0 o I V I 1; a) N E:l SITE I I I m rn co M c co I a' I I i TOWN SHOPPING CENTER RWR OFFICE COMPLEX SOUTH WINDSOR, CT !CALK: N.T.S. 219:3,� ROADWAY LAYOUT p� A.J.K. C1161®R'f L M.R. c�/� /'�(� !V�LfI NI uA1M ITRtLT MA' 19" 4 ENGINEERS I wCr"VM-KLD,CT csio! M-, No. 4 STORCH ENGINEERS B. Roadway Conditions In the vicinity of the proposed development the various conditions of the roadways were noted as follows: Buckland Road is a two-lane highway some 36± feet wide with a straight and level alignment in the project area. The roadway is bituminous concrete and sight distances from the proposed driveway location were found to be adequate. Ellington Road (Route 30) is a two-lane highway varying from 36 to 40 feet in width. It is straight and level in the project area and sight distances measured from proposed driveways were adequate. Adjacent development is primarily commercial with Society Bank, SNET, Colonial Cornere, Post Office, and Town Hall located in the vicinity. V. TRAFFIC GENERATION The proposed development will consist of two separate sites and traffic generation for each was estimated separately. Town Shopping Center is proposed to contain 60,000 square feet of retail space and a separate 5,000 square foot Office Building. RWR Office Complex is proposed to contain 12,000 square feet of office space. Traffic Generation estimates are given in Table I . 3 STORCH ENGINEERS TABLE I Trip Generation Estimates I . Town Shopping Center Daily Generation 60,000 S.F. Retail = 60 Generation Units x 79. 1 = 4 ,800 Trips 5,000 S.F. Office = 5 Generation Units x 12.30 = 60 Trips 4,860 Trips Morning Peak Period 60 x 2.9 = 180 5 x 2.32 = 12 192 Trips Afternoon Peak Period 60 x 8.2 = 492 5 x 2.20 = 11 503 Trips II . RWR Office Complex 12,000 S.F. = 12 Generation Units Daily 12 x 12.30 = 145 Trips Morning Peak Period 12 x 2.32 = 29 Trips Afternoon Peak Period 12 x 2.20 = 26 Trips Source - Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Technical Committee 6A-6 4 STORCH ENGINEERS Additional development in the area of the Town Shopping Center is proposed Burger King Restaurant. This will add a maximum of 157 trips during the PM peak hour period. VI . TRIP ASSIGNMENT A general review of the type of retail use proposed was conducted. The Town Shopping Center will not serve as a regional magnet but rather will have a local clientel . In addition some transient business will be generated from passing traffic. It is not likely that the facility will generate large amounts of "new" traffic during the peak traffic periods . Trips were therefore assigned to the drives on the basis of approaching volume percentages. Traffic associated with the RWR Office Complex is assumed to be "new" traffic and the volume added to background traffic. VII. ANALYSIS The nature of the proposed development is such that it should not of its own right aggrevate traffic conditions by increasing volumes. The Town Shopping Center is not of sufficient size to be a major regional traffic attractor. Most of those drivers utilizing the Center driveway the critical evening peak would have been in the area in any event. Thus a major increase in volume is not anticipated. There will however be different turning patterns because of the new drives. The evening peak period shows marked increases in traffic congestion at the Wapping Five Corners intersection. F STORGH ENGINEERS Manual turning movement counts when compared to analytical estimates of capacity indicated the intersection possesses little ability to process more vehicles. Observations during the evening peak hour confirmed levels of congestion were occurring on all approaches to the Wapping Five Corners signal . Vehicle queuing was excessive on Buckland Road and Ellington Road (Route 30) . The duration of observed traffic congestion was for approximately one hour between 4 :30 PM and 5: 30 PM. This would be consistant with travel times from Hartford - the major employment center. During the above period queues were seen to extend from the Wapping Five Corners signal east on Buckland Road past the proposed drive and south on Ellington Road (Route 30) past the proposed drive to the Town Shopping Center. Thus the major concern in assessing the impact of the proposed developments is the ability of traffic to safely enter or exit the site. To obtain a thorough understanding of the noted conditions meetings were held with Town staff. At these meetings it was noted that the Town has identified the "Wapping Five Corners" problem and will soon execute a contract for design of traffic control improvements to the area . The concept being proposed includes a widening of Buckland Road to four traffic lanes in the project area and the relocation of Ellington Road (Route 74) to intersect Sullivan Avenue west of the Post Office. Thus the project would eliminate one "leg" of the Wapping Five Corners intersection. Our analysis of the traffic conditions confirms the need for these changes . 6 STORCH ENGINEERS Recognizing the Town was proceeding on this course and with the understanding that those improvements would most likely not be constructed for 4-5 years we concentrated our analysis on those measures necessary to provide workable traffic operations at the driveways of the Town Shopping Center until the final project is contracted. The major problem area encountered would be by motorists attempting to exit the site during the evening peak period. Right turners would likely have little problems . Left turners would encounter queues that block sight distance an also provide little opportunity to enter the traffic stream. The fact that Buckland and Ellington Road (Route 30) are two lanes in the driveway areas also provides for delay potential to vehicles attempting to turn left into the site. Traffic engineering methods are available to mitigate these problem areas and we recommend a specific program in the following sections. VIII . RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION Based on the detailed analysis which was conducted for this project it has been found that certain remedial measures would be necessary to assure adequate traffic operations at site driveways pending completion of the widening of Buckland Road and construction of the Wapping Five Corners bypass road. A. Buckland Road Construct a minor widening to provide a westbound bypass lane so through traffic would not be delayed by traffic turning left into the center. 7 STORCH ENGINEERS B. Ellington Road (Route 30) Construct a minor widening to provide a southbound left turn lane into the Town Shopping Center. It is recommended that the drive to Ellington Road (Route 30) be considered for signalization with the signals tied to those at Wapping Five Corners. These would be operated to assure the ability to enter Ellington Road (Route 30) from Town Shopping Center or Colonial Cornere during heavy traffic periods. Upon completion of the Wapping Bypass Road signalization should be re-evaluated and if not warranted removed. Provided the improvements to the driveways are implemented as recommended we do not foresee a materially adverse effect in area traffic operations by the construction of the Town Shopping Center or RWR Office Complex. While area traffic conditions are currently congested during the evening commuter peak the improvements noted would mitigate any further deterioration and provide safe access to the proposed center. 8 APPENDIX SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable—Trips per 10000 Gross Square Feet. Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 12 . 0 4 . 5 L 6 2 Peak A.M. Enter 1 . 86 1 . 8 210 Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total i Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total o Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total c Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends R Peak Enter o Hour of Exit � Generator Total R Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 2 , 5 . 19, 20 , 21 , 51 , 5� 0 540 720 880 89 , 92 , 95 , 97 ITE Technical C-ommittee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: l475 Rev. 1979 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Shopping Center Land Use/Building Type 50 909 te oo on9 Gress Square Feet ITE Land Use Code 821 Independent Variable—Trips per 1 ,000 Gross Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 79. 1 161 .3 25.5 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 2.9 4 73.7 Adjacent P.M. Enter 2.4 96-4 Street Between Exit 2 .7 96-4 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 8 7 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total 9. 1 13 73.5 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter 4.2 1 85.0 Hour of Exit 5.6 3 72.5 Generator Total 12.6 5 76. 1 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 44.5 1 89 .3 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 3, 4, 6, 14, 19, 59 , 64, 72, 7S , 78 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date. 1975 , Rev. 1979 MACHINE COUNT SUMMARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: BUCKLAND ROAD Town: SOUTH WINDSOR Tape f 300 FT. SOUTH OF RTE.194 74&30 INTERS Date • 3-(27/28)-86 y� Counter # Direction: NORTH BOUND Project f : W�q7-9-11 7 MONDAY TUESDAY'WEDNES= TJRSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY n DATE 12- 1 . AM 8S 1-2 AM y3 2- 3 AM y 3-4 AM y 4-5 AM 5-6 AM 6-7 AM �7 7-8 AM I F3 8_g AM ley 9 -10 AM •�.6� �3y 30-11 AM z$6 z97 i1'-12 AM 12- f PM -v 1 - 2 PM 2-3 PM -� 3-4 PM /y� 4 -5 PM 7/0 5-6 PM 637 6 -7 PM y,z 7- 6 PM 3F7 8 -9 PM SS 9 -10 PM 10-11 PM 1 yy 11-12 PM HIG R 24 RLTOT COMMENT: MACHINE COUNT SUKKARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: BUCKLAND ROAD Town• SOUTH WINDSOR Tape # 00 FT SOUTH OF RTE.194,74&30 INTERS Date: ^-'^ �_ s�` _ 1- 4 W `U BOUND Counter # Direction: SOUTH Project # : ,qK ?7-0,Vf Q MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNMDAY TMJRSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY DATE 12- 1 Ali }-2 AM sy 37 3� 2- 3 AM F� 3-4 AM �D II 4-5 AM 5-6 AM 6-7 AM 7-8 AM 30� ) 33 �b 8-9 AM 33z 233 7/ 9 _10 • V7 3y3 AM 3.3.2 /63 10-11 AM �7r 3q� s ISW �,15 11'-12AM 12- f PM y/� �/06 Z-//3 330 1 - 2 PM 3?y 2- 3 PM yy'z 365 .3 9 y l 97 3-4 PM /y - 3-7 1 2-08 4 -5 PM 5-?9 3 106 320 7-77 . 5-6 PM - y70 3 -3l 2,61 6 -7 PM �z3 337 327 7- 8 PM 9g 3z� zz3 B -9 PM �7-0,� 9 -10 PM Abd 1, 38 /o 7 10-11 PM 9z 2 1911 83 Ll 11-12 PM 7� ^ 03 �- V . HIGH R 24 Wi TDT COMMENT: MA%--H:NE COUNT SUMP-kRY S70RCH ENGINEERS Location: ^u �� �snr T. � 'r 1T'� yr+r��<�ta ^ape # a �� p•� �c'. ;c � ?' 1/J`sR< Date: __�i__ 4 � � Counter ; Direction: Project MONDAY TUESDAY TKJRSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY DATE —31-56 12- 1 . AM I y —z AM / I 2- 3 AM 3-4 AM -9 4-S AM 5-6 Am 7/ 6-7 AM y32 7-8 Am 7;Z3 6-9 AM _523 9 -10 AM t D-11 AM I I"-IZ AM 1 12- 1• PM i - 2PM 2-3 PM I 3-4 PM J I 4 -5 PM 3-6 PM 6 -7 PM 7- 8 PM 8 -9 PM 9 -10 PM to-it PM 11-12 PM i H GH R t 2-4 MF.TDT Al C.pi.+ MENT: COLLISION DIAGRAM: ROUTES 30,194 AND 74 AT BUCKLAND ROAD JUL.1,1982-JUN,30,1985 ZSOUTH WINDSOR cr ,\o ti A� Cod d < N 7 0 � O r �, N 4 • 0 OAKLgND ROAD > a� 1���� T� r ?22^ �ygj, P 9- 5PM s-6-g$ P^� �� 6-7- /I'll 21 7- -r per• � 6.•4'op..• RTg, 30 -��8 �:J�p•T at 3;=DENTS 3T TYoc 7'rpE ;j.T +KICK �. O ✓XT,Aj_ ( D I O I O Q k�urr- lrA^&Ar. L� l �+ vl io l �6 Ile m LEGEND ----► MOVING VEHICLE —�+� LEFT TURN COLLISION ----► PEDESTRIAN SIDE SWIPE ® PARKED VEHICLE ^�♦ OUT OF CONTROL PARKING OR UNPARKEO VEHICLE S REAR END COLLISION WITH D FIXED OBJECT BACKING VEHICLE —" 0- REAR END COLLISION 1 FATAL ACCIDENT i HEAD ON COLLISION O PERSONAL INJURY • .* or.�T earl � CnLL !SION �4TE—UU� L — EATHER SALdL/V ROAD SURFACE LE LENGTH _— BY 1 R FN LOCATION T ��' COMPUTED HY CHECKED BY MOVEMENT NO 15 MOVEMENT NO. 15 TIME PERIODS MOVEMENT NO. 15 MOVEMENT N0. 15 PAIN MIN. MIN. 4 5 6 MTIITAL 7 9 9 TOTAL 10 I I 12 q 1 2 3 TAL 6AM - 6:15 6115 - 630 6130 - 645 3� 6A 5 - 700 HOURLY TOTAL 7.00 - 7;1 5 6� 85 245 �15 - 730 101 T 30 - 7:4 5 l 7,W 9 N z72 T45 - 8:00 163 S2 `1 ► OURLY TOTAL 6715 362 l03� 810 0 - 8:15 1�q 6 222 8:15 - 8,30 131 rj2 /83 845 8.45 - 900 HOURLY TOTAL goo - 9:1 5 9--15 - 930 9:30 - 9.4 5 9:4 5 - 1000 HOURLY TOTAL 10:0 0 - 10: 15 ID 15 - 10130 1030 - 1045 10-.45 - 11 00 HOURLY TOTAL 11.00 - 11,15 11,15 - 11-.30 I I-30 - 11*45 I I:4 5 -i2 N_OOf 1 -T----1 HOURLY 'AL --� MACHINE COUNT SUMMARY STORCH ENGINEERS i )cation. F i i i �i��T���� A '� Town: ��/ '/1'�<�C Tape # wry-,00 f1 iir �riRA1>> ST — Date: � /7- - 5 � �+' � 3 Counter # ection: \11J R II)'/ N J Project # : 1697- "U 1 i i MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDW TKIRSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY DATE -7 8e� -�-86 i t2- i AM S -2 AM Z 2- 3 AM q 3—a AM 4-5 AM �tS S-6 AM 7F 6-7 AM y10 7-8 AM 939 8-9 AM 637 9 -10 AM V-I I AM .F-12 AM 2,73 12- I• PM 1 - 2PM 31y 2- 3 PM 3 oG 3-4 PM �y 4 -5 PM 3�y 5-6 PM 3�6 6 —7 PM 7- 8 PM e -9 PM 86 9 -10 PM 2Q 10-11 PM ( U 2 11- 12 PM z V H G R WLTMAI �MME►dT: Ml+CH:NE COUNT SUKKARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: E LL. /yG 7 UN R 7- _ Town: :'ape #-500 FT 1.t/FST.DF _�3y�1r Aii��T Date • 6 J? W L13Q Direction: c 30V/yD project Q7-av 1 counter # MONDAY TUESDAY YAMNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY DATE I2- 1 . AM I-f9 1-2 AM 2 2- 3 AM 3-4 AM 6 4—S AM 13 3-6 6-7 AM f ( 6 7-6 AM 24 2 8-9 AM 3 OD 0-11 AM I 2 11'-I2 AM 2 2.R 12- 1• PM 330 1 - 2 PM 3,26 2-3 PM 361 { 3-4 PM �z 4 -5 PM , gp-7 I S-6 PM g6l 6-7 PM ( 472 7- 8 PM ) 311 I 6 -9 PM 1� 9 -IO PM I 3 10-11 PM J/0y 11-12 PM MJVG - i 24 H:LTC;TAI. I I COMMENT: • man r�aoror MUM MrrM rrrrrr rrrrM rrrrrrrr rrrirrrr rrrrrrrr rrrrrr= Cirirr . ' rrrr rrrrrrr rrrr rr ..�..� .. rrrr rrrrr :�:C:■� rrrrr. rrrr rrrrrrrrrr . , MMIMrr rrrr rrMMM rrMMM C= rrrrrr rrMMM r MMM rrMMM rrrrr■ MMMM rrrr rrrr .. r,r,r I== rr MMM rrrri■rrr iii • • rrrrM rrrrrrrrr rrrrr■rr .. rrrrrrrr rrMMM rrrrrrr rrrrM rrrr rrrr rrrr r�'�'iiii rrrr rrrr MMM ;, rrrrrr rrrrrrr �irMirrMir rMirsrM■�rMir rrrrrrrrr rr • �rMM rrrr rrMMM rrMMM rMM rrrr rrrr rrrr rrrr r MMM rrrrrr M �r C ..•� ...... rrrrrrrr iiiir rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrr �rrrrrrrrr .. ®M®® ©=am mr©camInal � m c�rmMarl rn� ©rorcflr. mrao.r� ®mom, • , ® ®� �rm® ®© IM UM rrrrmm m.c�r.©car ® • .. rate-9t ©erm� ®or . �m� ®MI¢� ra M ®® �. MMEM m a�sarc��r rrM • 1 ZMMAMMF - • rMl•7 io/IS1 � MMM_ rrr R' iSEr N _ A F . l (OWN S, u�Clf� �`�` 67 1 toil �v ATIIEA ROAD SUnrACE Q S1L�d.QY LENGTH BY LOCATION luk-OUPUTED N BY RF- ' E'LwCrav RD, F- 15HECKED BY _ �- T 15 WE PERIODS MOVEMENT No. 15 MOVEMENT NO. 15 MOVEMENT No. MOVEMENT NO. MIN. MIN. MIN. MIN. 13 14 15 ' OTA 16 17 18 TOTAL19 2 0 f OTAI DTAL 2WON- 12:15 12- 1 5 - 1230. 12-30 - 1245 1245 - 100 �IOORLY TOTAL 1;00 - 1:15 I: 15 — 1-30 1 :3 0 — 1;4 5 1: 45 — 2.00 HOURLY TOTAL 2�00 - 2115 2;15 - 2:30 230 - 2:45 2.45 - 3:00 HOURLY TOTAL 3,00 - 3115 3:15 - 330 3:30 - 345 3:4 5 - 400 I-QUR -Y TOTAL_ ti4 I 4 00 — 4:1 5 7 Z-1 -3 1 d� 6 17 54 7 7 4�15 — 4�0 � 26 45 -11 11 15 82 1013 HU 1� 5 430 — 445 ,f 24 3 68 2�1 -6 3 I �- -7 - 4-45 Z 16 9g - 300 7 Z9 �3Z 7 � HOURLYTOT Z5 lay{ I Hy Z73 a _ S 2 U 5 225 q0 5.00 — 6:15 3 7F 18 5F 83 J56 \o 6 515 - 5.30 32 3� 7.5 2 Zo 67 89 6�' 75 5:30 — 545 %4 34 ti5 3 Zy 6 Z 8 12 Ll 7� 5:45 - 600 Ll6 94 blin 'ALA75 4 2 10 HOURLY TOTAL I / 5 33U 2 Z3 "3 Z GRAND TOTAL] -- - - STORCH ENGINEERS Job !"K !?7-oc,7 STORCH ASSOCIATES SHEET NO OF Engineers - Architects - Landscape Architects f� Planners - Environmental Consultants CALCULATED BY /� �. N DATE (203) 529-7727 CHECKED BY DATE_ SCALE A A/A L•V S/ < I CA RA C I TS/ o f cT I o Al 0 F. RUC XLAMD .5., RTF5, ?G�, r9ti 174V �N SO L4TH W %AvDSCGP, I R(ACkLA VbST• RT4 30. W,9 • E-,B RT�. �y R i E 19 y RTF�0• L R L R L R L R L R -0 VEi41CLF )59 37? 32 J 3 y 4 -7 9 2 16 7 2 �z-4( k7 q0 6 APP' \.t!A (.am) ► 2 2 Li I SV, -6�Z7 262 3>2 2 !�y7 �/ 0 , 65 0 . G 7-o r',q L � 9 I v' I I I I �40wN 3F4( co 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR• CONN. 06074 �l�Osoe•co�'�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JULY 5, 1986 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION At the July 1, 1986 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted to take the following action: 1. Deny the application of Manchester Food Services, Ltd. for a subdivision of land located on the west side of Buckland Road, south of the Five Corners intersection, RC zone. 2 . Deny the application of Manchester Food Services, Ltd. for a site plan of development for "Burger King" , located on the west side of Buckland Road, south of the Five Corners intersection, RC zone . 3 . Deny, without prejudice, the application of Richard S. Kelley and R. S. K. -Kellco, Inc. for a site plan of development for property located on the south side of Ellington Road (Route 30) between Clark Street and Buckland Road, RC zone. 4 . Approve, with modifications, the application of R. W. R. Associates for a site plan of development for property located on the south side of Ellington Road (Route 30 ) between Clark Street and Buckland Road, RC zone. 5 . Approve, with modifications, the application of Daniel and Marie Onofrio, Fastener ' s Specialties, for a site plan of development for property located on Lots 7 and 8 , Commerce Way, in the John Fitch Industrial Center, I zone. 6 . Deny the application of Windshire Abbe Estates , Ltd. for a 4 lot resubdivision, known as Windshire Abbe Estates ,Phase III , located at the northerly end of Bramblebrae, south of Miller Road, consisting of 14 . 95 acres in $ze AA-30 , RR and FP zones. 7. Approve a Temporary and Conditional Permit for 2 years for Electro- Methods, Inc. , 330 Governors Highway, I zone, to park five storage containers on site as shown on the plan submitted. Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 2nd day of July, 1986 . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Item 1, 2 , 3 and 6 were denied by a Robert F. Gilligan, Chairman 6 to 0 vote with 1 abstention. Voting David H. Sorenson, Secretary in favor of the denial were Commis- sioners Hallowell, Conde, Asplund, Rossi , Castro and Sorenson. Mr. Gilligan abstained. Items 4 , 5 and 7 were approved by a 6 to 0 vote with 1 abstention. Voring in favor were Commissioners Hallowell, Conde, Asplund, Rossi and Castro. Mr. Gilligan abstained. Virginia S. Graney, Recording Secretary