Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1742 Main Street • MAL INSPE IONS: Building = APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing HVAC Date: Sprinkl —17 4 2 —MAIN -STREET _ Electric Estimated Cost $ Zoning ! s 2117 5 Permit Fee $ Affidavit j NO. Occupancy Fee $ 3 Eng. Dept. `� �� Fire Dept. COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS. Total Fee 1 3 Health Dept. TYPE OR PRINT ONLY 'T�Z SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE. Approved for CO: ,��� (Additional Co TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT �� 6��FF,`,•/ The undersigned, hereby applies to do work according to the following specificatio s;,,, 611 Zz 47 S�ro/ Job Location Lot No. Side of Street one - Applicant C6WW ke 1301 L*244 , Qfr-- Vs Lr . Tel. Address I W F-1\44L;0re VTW �'t- 'N'1WhIVAT40 Zip ®&Z7 I Lic.# STREET CITY S ATE Owner Address Architect e;P�e Address Size New Area: Ft. Front Overall +Ft. Deep Overall l!l Total Area 5140 #Garages 1 C-4 y Lavatories Size of Lot •3,Ig3� Dist. from Street Line 3 Bathrooms Rooms 1 st--4?-2nd 15 3rd Purpose of this Permit New Single Family Dwelling 'C?&O City Water K Well 0 Sep 'c 0 Sewer Use Group Construction Type Approved by J Date 'L ( BD1A 11/88 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor ' and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines and required distances from all other zones and is located in a zone in which this building and its use is allowed. Signe I xV zZ v , I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in thi on for permit. Signed 5ieA 1 f AVI -DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIN v 1 f f�o INSPECTION RECORD Footing Framing Foundation Fireplace/Chimney Insulation Plumbing Permit# � Inspections: HVAC Permit# O T / Inspections: Electrical Permit .3 0 A, Inspections: Sprinkler Permit# Inspections: f Location of job AFFIDAVIT Additional Fee . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . State of Connecticut ss. County of Hartford (06 w1.�V S �v� v . . . . r/7 2 .'°`.C .. . . for buildin erected under I �.. . . . of Contractor Permit No. �1.22-C)0'1 Q! . . . . . issued by the Dep't of Building of the Zbwn of South Windsor being duly sworn,make oath and say that the actual cost of the completed work authorized under said permit was.. . . .. �o.. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .day of . . . . .�� . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D.19 . Estimate Cost:$ 3 �i �� Difference: $ 67, F UU . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. otary Public. 111SPeCLIUil / MJJPL-UVdl UdLe 13Y H(Jpl Code Description Due Whom Code Comment ---------------------------- 95-22461-B 9,000 B10 FINAL 01/08/96 JFH D SNOWED IN B10 FINAL 06/28/96 JFH A APPROVED FOR CLOSEOUT FINAL INSPECTIONS: Building APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing HVAC Date: � Sprinkler 1742 MAIN STREET Electric Zoning Estimated Cost $ /�D O �� � Permit Fee; /y Affidavit NO. 22099 Occupancy Fee $ 't 3 Eng. Dept. 27_li793 Fire Dept. COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS. Total Fee $ Health Dept. TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Approved for CO: SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE. (Additional Cost) $ TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT The undersigned, hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications: Job Location 5 Lot No. Side of Street Zone Applicant _ O/a/,-7h o b al✓a'Gr<_2_ Tel. # (a V `(-eSJ V Address 7 &n a •Wj'?a s0P— e-1' Zip06 4 I .--- STREET CITY STATE �LIC.# Owner QMh o VE k 141-2 Address C'/yM t a r Architect Address Size New Area: Ft. Front Overall Ft. Deep Overall Total Area #Garages Size of Lot Dist. from Street Line Lavatories Bathrooms Rooms 1 st 2nd 3rd Purpose of this Permit p+LC-7c *C.T/" ONe - UN ee o-.2 y 7 City Water 0 Welt 13 Septic 0 Sewer O Use Group Construction Type Approved by J Date BD1A 11/88 I hereby agree to conform to all th requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and th Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distanc from all street lines,side yard lines and required distances from all other zon s and is located in a zone in which this building and its use is allowed. ,f SI9 D /� ned Q'f� I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application or perm't. Signed Drrn —DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIAt� INSPECTION RECORD Footing Framing Foundation Fireplace/Chimney Insulation Plumbing Permit# .S;a Inspections: HVAC Permit# Rci Inspections: LO A4o- Electrical Permit# /32�Z- J 3�36 Inspections Sprinkler Permit# _Inspections: Inspection / Approval Date By Appl Code Description Due Whom Code Comment ` ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 94-21175-B 315,700 BO1 FOOTING 07/22/94 JFF A B02 FOUNDATION 07/25/94 JFF D STRIPPINGFOOTINGSSUBWALLNOTFORMED B09 OTHER 08/12/94 JFF REBARSINPLACEPER072294PLAN B02 FOUNDATION 09/19/94 JFH A B09 OTHER 11/29/94 JFH STOP WORK ORDER B05 FIREPLACE/CHIMNEY 12/22/94 JFH A P03 ROUGH 01/13/95 JFF A H03 ROUGH 01/23/95 JFH A B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 02/01/95 JFH D BEAMS NEED BRACING E01 SERVICE 02/23/95 JFF A RELEASE ISSUED B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 03/07/95 JFH D FRRAMING NOT FIXED E03 ROUGH 03/07/95 JFH A PRIOR TO INSULATION B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 03/08/95 JFH A B10 FINAL 07/06/95 JFF D NOT READY B10 FINAL 07/14/95 JFH A W/ PROMISARY LETTER WORK TO BE DONE IN 5 DAYS 94-8944-H 24,000 94-12947-E 8,500 94-9522-P 12,000 94-13282-E 6,000 10 Total Est Value 366,200 * !UVV C2 IV Dwelling 5,740 234,880.80 Basement 3,930 48,732.00 Garage 900 11,160.00 Smoke Det 20 1,500.00 BOCA Value 334,788.26 /� IQ,�"� Difference (31,411.74),� 8 p•� � ZI�,1�� SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 1742 MAIN STREET LOT_# ie eering) DISAIVATORE COLOMBO JR & KAREN Date Reviewed Approve /Denied 76 KENT LANE,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT Reviewed By lanning) BP_#_22099_ Ph_#_(203)644-8514 Date Review 7 /I J pprov /Denied Date Submitted 07/10/95 ***** FOR 6 of 0 ati**** As -�qu,red in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of Ocr—ir,ancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: Approv Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan 3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking 4. Utility location; a. sanitary sewer/sep*d==s em b. foundation drain c. electrical & telephone d. water e. other 5. Sewer connection charge paid 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding 8. Planning & Zoning/ Inland Wetlands Considerations r Sewer Permit No. Z Z Z Pavement Excavation No. COMMENTS: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: &0e-Wftj<1 CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Phone No. 4 -C-2 Address W Q G &�*27 1 Site Name P&Z No. s-T�IAJ Owner 1 — Phone No. (p Contractor let 1�G Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Engr. Date: 2 CHANGE: (Describe location and n ture of change. Include three (3) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) I. 2o A400 T OF flSff�j� LELA901A P-7NEt- jZf 6f F:0* V0J-q'10 0 2.1 97x-> AWL19- QWf;f 6 A�> -9.) R)3usT DK12bLVbA LbYw r. Reason for Change: (Why is change required) htW2 VC!EA "0�4� APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir.. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer. Date: G"Z 7-!� Dir. of Pub i43rks Date: Other:, 2 M96J Date: '16-Z a-T - STAFF CO ENTS: (TW�J- C(- APft,--* 93-NSuV vvA � a N2 e� White - Town Engineer lr Pink - Director of Planning Ut , G Yellow - Applicant A �� h , y�i '�{ 4 J W&&Aot �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 I CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Certificate Number s- 7 Date Issued ?116AE To: rALAV�7V,0!�f ! 0 pp i cant , Name(s) of Owner S4,*01,5 Address /7A/Z /A/ c�r�ef'E7 Address of proposed work Contractor 1 - Y On 2- the Historic District Commission voted to grant this ate Certificate of Appropriateness for work described in Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness .Number 9S• 7 dated 915�9� k COMMENTS/STIPULATIONS: EEE A-777'�rf E4b �C Sc•e�vj7 0�,/ Blvd S�a.o,E of uo.e.�C. e H i stor c Di stri om. - ----------- ---------- For Building Inspectof Use (when inspection is necessary) This certifies that the work herein described has been completed in compliance with the terms specified. Date of Inspection Attest Building Inspector Dated: C r T-awn Ole slou� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 fat-co r'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 q s- C To: Historic District Commission Date: 5 f APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under an "Ordinance Establishing an Historic District within the Town of South Windsor", Ordinance 100, for proposed work as described below and as shown on photographs and plans or drawings (where applicable) , accompanying this application. Name of Applicant: C'pIt)ry) 1)Ca/e", D 1301 V01-8rk- - Address: 17 Ll 2_ Mal"A 'Si Name(s) of Owner(s): Address of Owner(s): cl Z mm Sl Address of proposed work: 1 'J L1 1_ mi1i.1 Si Agent or Contractor: 4-1 1 Address: Nature and description of proposed work: (include plan, photo(s) if possible, and elevation drawing where necessary. ) Enclosed is a copy of Ordinance and applicable Statutes which you should review in filling out this Application. Use reverse side hereof and/or additional pages if needed. You will be notified of a hearing date. fy\ VH� 0',,, L1 Proposed date of commencement of work: el-,30-el �o Estimated completion date: S Signature of Owner���./c hi gnat ure of Appl i cant lt;9lIZZ6),-�14tx Signature of Owner ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR COMMISSION USE ONLY: Application No. "1 Approved: Date Received: / , r Denied: Date: DISALVATORE NETWORK MARKETING INCORPORATED P.O. Box 516 East Windsor Hill CT 06028-0516 Tel:2e9-644-8514dt?9`_700'0 Fax:-208-644-25M �y 6 August 30, 1995 Town of South Windsor Historic Society Re: Lamposts on driveway Dear members, Enclosed are the proposed lamposts and the lights for the top. We have also drawn out the placement of these lamposts. Please let us know if these are acceptable for the keeping in this historic district. Thank you very much. We are very excited to living in the beautiful section of Old Main Street, South Windsor. Sincerely, Karen DiSalvatore .Sfi IG1rmpQ5* Ri4wg- - - - �-- - - -- - — -- - -- -dap-fit-. . I 174E main 1)L�oIJonre1i r a ,s •N� ,t1: 00 . w OF All i Mi , �N ��- ALL CLEAR WESTERN RED CEDAR CENTER- DRILLED , ---------------------- S`,y�" Ak (i 5,Sr r i , i G 4t,4(-e. C/,Oi;9,,., OA pl au f` hq,it �i rt /��t� ocwlet. ---- ---- -- - h(61 let) --- S i l aura l /nr I tii�v✓ d✓� ITLv�c _ :�t 2O �Mi.•� / Tt 4 1�lcl(crS FleA Covl q uej4) �P4�h ��c�o1G Jt-.+t.✓T ---- i /o p,fl�ywti L;..< i,�✓s�a��Ji� - =1'------ - ---- ----------- —- -- i --- / yC -- --'— - ------- -- ---- ------------------ j VIP t1 -- - � --------,�-.�� ,V�"'�-/_��-�l�.S�t/--ASP��d��+-� - -Fi�/'t -�I�!t ----�I F ��✓�i'�-- ---------------------- I Lew G,I S tf 7 - - , i --------------------------- -- ----------- - ------ - -------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Cf a 75' C7 v J� ,2 7oa657 Se f G104 �...T nR tt at, 4L e J co - - — E/p✓� !r14� Ud1'y� N-t!c/ ----- - -�l�a Ts�✓Y ,lbw/sN � � � - -- L,'NtsMCA,c ----- --- ------- S �',, ' Colonial Builders_off, T, . E_. ..,�_.���. c�m_��:, �':�_��,, �..�. r, 21175 16 5 River Rd. , W.W_i l l ington., Ot 16 "9 4..�,.(P.M y. ) #1742 Main St. e Disalvator Reside_ r,. . _ ence _ Lt _• - f�Za— s Tat s� �a�� _ R3—4 S-W •� � �_ .i. :tom_ �, _ .. `� s. -�. _17. a. ` .._3+ :. _ _ )' �'s_�_;.�_'. G-. I.�..'�_ � ;'� '_ Fti f�.,1. r I_ j_ , '_ 1 If i C'"kjec Y0� C G��oti�c,1 e1d�� : u?;ll Call wvx- Wl t.,, U-4,3S a c(e,,r; CAM -�Ik 1Je,, lNe�[�.•�I s (�('PN,,,( C,Q,,jj J4 ') o� Sw /cc e.F4tr� Vol • ! r l� I_ _� . _`(, i t � � � r -- .J_. , � -/� �l.� - c �I � °� � � i � � y�' ,rt �+-y, I„� { IT • _ l ! .i i '� �) �� � 1 � ] � L ��� C�_ 1.✓1 _` _� „ 1 T 12 2 T 71 11, L` , 77 _:1 U++7 C i C j%C)rl 13 7D 11"l jj "` Tr. E ') q-_ ol _ 1 p _ i q `l r71 _ :J :i � :� '�'�T U;,0 S 03:1_1 11j?1 11 12 1jI— -,C-)i_�s til,� t 1��_;C(7)j 1ED PF3S ' 11LTU S lQw S Li. �1c3, �! Ti — C � — 4 1 11 J__ C11 12 1 TE U ! TU 0 LQ 1,i 7 j 1f �fl 1 JAN 2 5 1995 South Windsor -- --- -- 1 + BUILDING - --------- 0 y y - -- l! ---- --- -- ------ -- -----�'L Z__M s7L ------------- - - - ------ ------------------------------- ----------------- I a I ------- --- r, - - ---------��� ---'6 Q NL r �i I' -------- -- - - ---� -- -- -- --- - - -- ---- --------- --- --- ---- ---- III zt emu. . - -2 - ----- ---------- -------- --- - - ----------------------- - 1 ------ -- - --------------- 1 i i; , , 'I I, „I z + f� KY a Fa F .. - wry f � may: Y y. { w,. r r s i ' r 3 ` Y i r ^+ t—I to � n , i s t r TO•d -1di0i 7.5 COLONIAL BUILDERS FAX Cover Sheet A,Tradition of Excellence our FAX Number is 429-9015 Dat To: From: r74-z �11V�1V � ��/� YM Re: DISAWA-TOM RE098'al Instructions: pS, ,t, foU,0V)-- 4r TO My '7/ZVI+ W fw)e 5whofo IWO z T 15 NoTw Mp-AWjp& IS G-TILL ItJCLADW . 7Ne T N 5CEE� PpalLy IWO 0� f ems, r C-1 z-,M 4#I,-- !�P L4 F se call us if the message or copy you received was incomplet or not 1 gibl . Total number of gags 1_ __ (including this cover page) . 165 Riv r Road West Wiliington, CT 06279 Tel. (203) 429-5708 i 0'd S S 06 630 ZOE S63QI I f la 1d I NO-M 9 Z:L Z V66 Z-BO-o ld 7 g, f < COLONIAL BUILDERS A Tradition of Excellence FAX Cover Sheet Our FAX Number .is 429-9015 Date: -7 /-z zlc TO: From: , Re: 1-74Z WOq-. Instructions: R4zr-;6P *VED g1) Fa�p� Af 1,-- -To YaA fW -� F1 ase call us if the message or copy you received was incomplete or not legible. Total numb r of pages {including this cover pa4 ) . 165 River Road West WiAington, CT 06279 Tel. (203) 429-5708 Told ST06 6zv 2az Sd3G-1 I nE IU I N0-100 Sb:SZ V66T-zz--lnr 1^ ED•d nalol 7 2, --III COLONIAL K --�— °��-- --- SHEET l65 River Road DATE WEST WIl.L1NGTON, CONNECTiCUT 06279 caLouLATEDSY (2Q3) 429-70+43 DATE CHECKED --+--. sGCE wza TM ...... FAC-6 ZO•d si0G 6zv 20Z s83dn I ns Id I N0103 917:si j;,66i-z;-inr I COLONIAL BUILDERS A Tradition of Excellence June 24, 1994 Jerry Iazzetta Town Engineer Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 1742 Main Street South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Iazetta: On behalf of the owners, Mr. and Mrs. DiSalvatore, we would like to implement the changes described herein and shown on the accompanying plan. 1 . Shift the house location twenty feet (20) to the north and east . 2 . Raise the foundation top of wall elevation 2 . 83 ft, from 82 . 0 ft . to 84 . 83 ft . The garage floor will be raised 2 . 83 ft . to 83 . 83 . The basement floor will be raised 2 . 83 ft . to 78 . 13 . 3 . The invert for the sanitary line will be raised from 78 . 4 ft . to 79. 0 ft . 4 . The driveway layout will be adjusted as shown. 5 . A landscaping wall will be constructed along the frontal area of the house as shown. Wall will taper into the grade and will be a maximum of 4' high. We would like to commence work the week of June 27, but will only proceed pending your approval of these changes. Sincerely, Ste hen Bocwinski Project Manager 165 River Road West Willington, CT 06279 Tel. (203) 429-5708 1 �3 SCHEDULE A A certain piece or parcel of land situated on the easterly side of Main Street in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin set in the general easterly line of Main Street at the southwesterly corner of the parcel herein described, which point is also a northwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Dudley F. Clapp; thence southeasterly from said point of beginning in line of land of said Clapp on a line forming an interior angle of 880 53' 51" with said easterly line of Main 11� Street, a distance of 356.29 feet to a point marked by a tree with embedded wire; thence continuing in line of land of said Clapp along a line forming an interior angle of 1790 49' 41" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 130.43 feet to another tree with embedded wire; thence continuing in line of land of said Clapp on a line forming an interior angle of 1810 07' 44" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 364.23 feet to another tree with embedded wire; thence still continuing in line of land of said Clapp on a line forming an interior angle of 1750 12' 18" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 51.82 feet to a fence post set at the southeasterly corner of the parcel herein described; thence still continuing in line of land of said Clapp on a line forming an interior angle of 70' 29' 39" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 32.19 feet to an old fence post; thence continuing in line of land of said Clapp on a line forming an interior angle of 1960 55' 52" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 237.34 feet to a 42" cherry tree at the northeast corner of the parcel herein described; thence in line of land now or formerly of Talcott I. Clapp and land now or formerly of William Lacy, in part on each, on a line forming an interior angle of 950 29' 21" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 558.52 feet to an iron pin set at a northwesterly corner of the parcel herein described; thence southwesterly in line of land now or formerly of Robert J. Accorsi, which line forms an interior angle of 920 01' 34" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 204.22 feet to another iron pin; thence continuing in line of land of said Accorsi which line forms an exterior angle of 2680 53' 51" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 30U.00 feet to an irur► pin set in said easterly lice of Main Street; thence southwesterly in said easterly street line, which forms an interior angle of 91" 06' 09" with the last mentioned line, a distance of 50.01 feet to the point and place of beginning. CONTAINING 165,239 square feet of land. TOGETHER with and subject to a right of way running from Main Street easterly across the northerly 12 feet of land of said Robert J. Accorsi and the above described parcel as shown on the hereinafter referred to map. REFERENCE is hereby made to a map or plan entitled, "Property Surveyed for MARION P. CASE Main Street South Windsor, Conn. Boundry Survey Scale 1" = 40' Date 9-28-78 Revised Date 6-24-82 R.M. I hereby certify that map is substantially correct and in accordance with Class A-2 of the code of the Connecticut Technical Council, Inc. Kenneth R. Boud L.S. #6392", which map is' on file at the Town Clerk's Office of said Town of South Windsor. SAID premises are subject to any and all provisions of any ordinance, municipal regulation, or public or private law and to encumbrances as of record may appear. SAID premises are further subject to Inland - Wetland Regulations as of record may appear. AND taxes on the Grand List of October 1, 1992, which taxes the Grantees assume and agreed to pay. FLAHERTY, MEISLER & COURTNEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 30 LAFAYETTE SQUARE SUITE 116 P.O.BOX 508 321 BRICKTOP ROAD VERNON,CONNECTICUT 06M P.O.BOX 4 WILLIMANTIC,CONNECTICUT 06226 LEO B FLAHERTY (203)872-72W (203)423-4W e ARTHUR P.MEISLER REPLY TO VERNON OFFICE JOSEPH D COURTNEY October 27, 1993 Town Planner's office Marcia Banach, Director 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 1742 Main Street South Windsor Dear Marcia: As per our telephone conversation of even date concerning the above mentioned property enclosed please find a copy of Memorandum of Decision dated October 21, 1981. Please review said document and advise as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your kind cooperation in this matter and I await your reply. Very truly yours, -jtl-v�"'� >-s Joseph D. Courtney JDC/pam Enc. cc: Ralph Alexander, Esq. ij 1 N0. 25 16 32 ' DUDLEY F. CLAPP, ET AL SUPERIOR COURT IV• JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ I f NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD , IZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF I THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR : OCTOBER 21, 1981 I+ MEMORANDUM OF DECISION I I This appeal is from a decision of the South Windsor Zoning l Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the "Board") granting I I a variance of the 150 foot frontage requirement to allow the use :- of backland as a residential building lot with frontage of 50.01 ; feet on Main Street. The pertinent facts are as follows: The owner of the subject property is Mrs. Marion P. Case of South Windsor. When Albro Case, the deceased husband of Marion P.' Case, purchased the tract in 1962, , it had approximately 254 feet of frontage on the easterly side of .1 Main Street and an average depth of approximately -880 :feet. Shortly - after the a purchase, Mr. Case conveyed the northerly 204 feet, to a depth of 300 'feet (now known as ) , to a third !, party. He retained title to the remaining portion consisting of 11roughly 3.8 acres with frontage on Main Street of 50.01 feet. Mr.' ') Case diedd Marion P. Case inherited title to the 3.8 : .� >trls Igo lid 0 18nc� 11OWUnl II �1831U 3N1 �U 3U1��0 r Facres. Her application for a variance was granted by the Board on October 2, 1980 and it is that action which i•s the subject of 1 this appeal. i, The land is located in an A-40 Residential Zone. Section I' . 1' 5.2 of the South Windsor zoning regulations requires that a residential building lot in the stated zone have frontage of 150 ' feet on a public street. Mrs. Case had originally applied to the i IiBoard on January 10, 1979 for a variance of the front footage 11requirement to allow the construction of a single family residence I !' on the 3.8 acres. After a public hearing on that application, the 1, I' Board, on or about February 1, 1979, voted to deny the variance on the ground that the hardship was self-created. That denial of iiher request for a variance was appealed to the Superior Court, I� ! Judicial District of Hartford, and the Court (Bieluch, J) •sustain d I, the appeal in a Memorandum Of Decision filed April 22, 1980. The Court found that •"the :situation falls* outside- the ' scope of the !- self-created hardship rule" since "the manner in which [Mrs. Case] �Iacquired the property [by inheritance] was purely involuntary." I On June 20, 1980, Mrs. Case filed this application for a variance of Section 3. 2 to permit use of the acreage as a ; residential building lot with less than the required frontage. i 2 I i I � S P hearin�A public ,, on the second application was noticed for hearing ,, on 10, 1980, but, on that date, the application was tabled at the request of Mrs. Case. The public hearing was held on July 29, 1980. At the conclusion thereof, the Board's chairman inquired as i ° to whether the subject property was in a flood management area; , as neither attorney was certain, action on the application was I, deferred pending receipt of that information. Thereafter, upon (, P g being advised that no portion of the parcel was within a "flood ( control management" area, the Board voted to grant the second iapplication stating the following reasons: i "because this parcel suffers an unusual hardship in that the property cannot be II utilized for any other purpose because of the I topography of the land and the character of I� the neighborhood would not be detrimentally affected .because any residence would be subject to approval by the historic' distrlct:- - Tie variance is not out of harmony with the general I purpose and intent of the zoning laws and I •. regulations since the lot size provides a more than adequate buffer or separation between j it residences, and the public health, safety, I �� 3 1 1 f convenience, welfare and property values are protected and not harmed. The conditions of 1 , the approval are that any building constructed would have to comply with a theoretical building I line at least 150 feet behind adjoining property . (' on Main Street, and plans would have to be sub- mitted to Planning and Zoning and approved by Planning and Zoning for the housing of any livestock, specifically for the approval and/or I fencing for such livestock. jl i Plaintiffs in this appeal each own land which abuts the subject Ilacrea e. The contend that 1 there was insufficient evidence g Y ( > before the Board to support the reasons stated for. the granting lof the variance; (2) the Board exceeded its authority in granting 1 ' a variance allowing only 50.01 feet of street frontage when the , regulation _required 150---f.eet...of..-frontage. -in- an.*!40. zone.;- -and, ,1 (3) the Board exceeded its authority in attaching conditions to I� the variance. In its Answer, defendant Board pleaded two special ' defenses: (1) the Superior Court judgment of April 22, 1980, sus- i, 'jtaining the appeal from the denial of Mrs. Case's first application i for a variance, is res iudicata as to this action; and, (2) the ►f i 4 I i �=w I I I I . I 1� Board, in the past, had granted other applications under substan- tially ! PP ; the same circumstances and therefore a denial of this ' � r application would constitute an arbitrary decision by the Board. ' Y I . Plaintiffs are Dudley F. Cl.app, 1726 Main Street, and, Robert J. Accorsi, 1752 Main Street, both of South Windsor. The record indicates that the Accorsi land is bounded on two sides by the subject tract; the• Clapp land abutts this tract on the south. General Statutes Sec. 8-8 provides that "[a]ny-person severally or jointly aggrieved by any decision of [the Board], or a y person I. � ' owning land which abuts or is within a radius of one hundred feet F' of any portion of the land involved in any decision of (the Board], E'may • o * take an appeal to the superior court. * *" (Emphasis added) ' Since both - • - ---- - _ ---- ---- - '--plaintiffs are abutting ownersp they clearly--have - statutory statutory standing .to .prosecute this appeal. ' I II i The Board's first special defense warrants initial consid- Aeration since if the prior decision of the Superior Court,' filed i April 22, 1980, is res.. udicata as to the instant proceeding, - - - 'Ithat, in and of itself, would require the dismissal of this appeal. I .I 5 i) A review of the record in this case discloses that the town ,of South Windsor did not file an appeal from Judge Bieluch's decision in Dk. No. 228741, Marion P. Case v. Zoning Board of ,'Appeals, Judicial District of Hartford/New Britain. Thus, the 1- judgment entered in that case, on the Memorandum of Decision filed iAprii 22 1980 is a final judgment. h l � � j g The doctrine of res udicata ('mandates that an existing final judgment rendered upon the merits, ' Owithout fraud or collusion, by a- court of competent jurisdiction, ,' is conclusive of causes of action and of facts or issues thereby I I litigated as to the parties and their privies in all other actions in the same or any other judicial tribunal of concurrent juris- ; diction. Wade's Dairy, Inc. , Et. Al. v. Town Of Fairfield, Et. Al. , 42 Conn. L.J. . No. 4, p. 5, 6 (July 22, 1980). Where the same cause * I lof action is again sued upon, the prior final judgment is a bar s Awith respect to any claims relating to the cause of action which i ,(were actually made or which might have been made. Bridgeport ;j ffydraulic Co-v. Pearson, 139- Conn. 1816,' 196 - (1'952)-. Our Supreme res I I1Court has held that the doctrine of udicata a, ._._,. PPlies to a Ijjudgment rendered by a court on review of a decision made .by an ' administrative body.. Corey v. Avco Lyc minx_ Division, 163 Cdnn. 1, 309, 317-318 (1972). 6 i I I The doctrine of res judicata is one of rest and is enforced i on the ground of public policy"; the purpose of- the doctrine is , to prevent a multiplicity of suits. Accordingly,g y, where "there is an identity of actions between the same parties, or where the , actions,actons, though not. identical, g cal, do raise identical issues, or where ; some issue is necessarily involved in both actions, and those issues ! are litigated before and finally determined by a court of competent . jurisdiction, they become res judicata as to the parties and those' j who are in privity with them." (Emphasis added) Brad v. ,' Anderson, 110 Conn. 432, 435 (1930). A cause of action is that single group of facts which is i, claimed to have brought about an unlawful injury to the plaintiff ; and which entitles the plaintiff to relief. Wade's Dairy, In Et Al V. Town of Fairfield Et Al. , supra at -pt 7,-- -H-er-el- the cause I' of action which was the subject matter of the fir I - • st appeal is I- identical to that which has given rise to this appeal : both were abased on Mrs., Case's applications for the same variance with respect to the Ii P same land and upon the same legal grounds. Thus, - lithe same legal and factual issues were before the Board on both Ilapplications. However, on the basis of the record now before th I, isI court, it is impossible to ascertain if all of the factual and I i , j i � I i Ilegal issues being raised here were actually and finally determined � by the Board on Mrs. Case's previous application and, therefore, ;! if those issues were before the Superior Court in the previous appeal. The sole reason given by the Board for the denial of the first application (according to the Superior Court's Memorandum Of .. Decision) was that "the hardship was self-created." . The Memorandum �IOf Decision states that evidence was submitted to the Board that I the land in question was not suitable for any permitted use other i than the proposed building lot, and, that a denial of the variance would practically destroy the value of the property. However, on ithe present record, it is unclear whether the Board (on the first application), or the Court in the appeal from the Board' s first decision determined an issue on the requested variance other � � Y than that of a "self-inflicted hardship." Certainly, as the Board ' concedes, the emphasis in the previous appeai wdff on the questioni I I' of a -self-created hardship. As stated in Brady v. -Ande-r-sons, euPra _ . .at-`p --435 i-,th-w-prtneipi,"f udicnta..­-binds--the--p 4* -4-n-_._ the subsequent action only when the same issues were "litigated before and finallydetermined by a court" in the previous action. On the record now before this court, it cannot be said that the issues being raised in the present appeal were finally litigated j in the prior proceedings. i I�) I� (I 11 Accordingly, the court concludes that the present appeal is inot barred, or subject to dismissal, under the doctrine of res udi ata. - I 1 i III i The question before the court in the instant a ppeal is whether ,I the Board, in granting Mrs. Cases second application for a variance, ;; acted illegally, arbitrarily, or in abuse of its administrative '' discretion. Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 385 (1967). Determinations of local zoning boards are not to be I overturned on judicial review unless it is found that they acted unfairly, without proper motives, or upon invalid reasons. Devaney , v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 143 Conn. 322, 325 (1956) ; Malloy v. West Hartford,138 Conn. 497, 505 (1952). Whether the action taken was arbitrary, illegal, or an abuse of discretion is to -be deter 1 mined on the record of the board's proceedings. Miclon v. ZoninA Board of A gals, 173 Conn. 420 (1977) Belkna v:- Zonin _ - --- ; p s� Beard p supra. Where it appears that an honest 1 .2f -Avveals, PP nest judgment has been reasonably and fairly exercised after a full hearin courts s should be cautious about disturbing the decision of a local authority. Kutcher v. Town Planning Commission, 138 Conn. 705, 1' 710 (1952). Since zoning questions involve circumstances and i - -_9. I I f 1 � , conditions peculiarly within the knowledge of local zoning ! authorities, the solutions are properly within the province of ! 1 -isuch local boards. Levinsky y. Zoning Commission, 144 Conn. 117 (1965). On appeal, the court should not substitute its judgment I' for the proper discretion of the local zoning authority. Couch v. liZoning Commission 141 Conn. 349 (1955). The burden of proof in 11overturning a decision of a local zoning board rests upon the plaintiff. Rocchi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 157 Conn. 106, 110 11 (1968); McMahon v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 140 Conn. 433, 438 ,; (1953); DeFelice v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 130 Conn. 1569 164 ;I ► (1943); Perdue v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 118 Conn. 174, 178 (1934). ' It is fundamental that an applicant for a variance has the burden of establishing unusual hardship resulting from the appli- . 1 ,! cation of the zoning regulation. A party seeking a variance must demonstrate that 'his` property is peculiarly disadvantaged- by the = ' ` ; operation of the =zoning ordinance--and not merely:thA - . �....�. ras�ii"" a ua"T a tdbfie-to-fir-prvF 'tea�- P 9 P fin' � e r--- • hood, results from this enforcement of the code. Ward v. Zoning ' Board of Appeals, 153 Conn. 141, 143 (1965). Section 11.4.1,c of-the South Windsor zoning regulations !, authorizes the Board to determine and vary the application of the I i .II 1 10 I; . 1 I) I , (I I! • zoning laws and regulations in harmony with their general purpose land intent and with due consideration for conserving the public 11 ,Ihealth, safety, convenience, welfare and property values, solely with respect to a parcel of land where owing to conditions espe- Jcially affecting such parcel, but not affecting generally the � district in which it is situated, a literal enforcement of such zoning laws and regulations would result in exceptional difficulty or unusual hardship." The ordinance is consistent with the powers ' granted local zoning authorities under Section 8-6 of the General I' Statutes. Under such a provision, the Board was justified in 11 igranting the variance only (1) if the effect of the zoning �iregulatfon upon the subject property has been to create an excep- I! tional and unnecessary hardship, and (2) if the Board's exercise !!' of it authorityto va permitted a use which is in harmony with s vary p y " the general 'purpose of the zoning ordinance (or comprehensive i, plan) and results in substantial justice. Libby V. Board, of ! Zoningw als, 141 Conn. 5959 600 ' (1954). i Ii Plaintiffs' first contention is that the applicant for the variance (Mrs. Case) failed to establish the required hardship. As stated, the Board. predicated the hardship on the finding that of the "the parcel cannot be used for any other purpose because/topography V. ; of the land. . ." The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized� y ha p sized that economic loss, alone, is not the decisive factor in determining jwhether a variance should be granted. Ga ribaldi v. ZoningL Board I' of Appeals 163 Conn. 235 239 (1972) Carlson I ' ' �• V. Zoning Board of ARReals, 158 Conn. 86, 89 (1969) , Libby - _ v. Board of Zoning Appeals, supra at p. 51. However, if the Board can reasonablyconclude de that a zoning regulation practically destroys or ' ti y greatly decreases the value of a specific piece of property, it may vary the terms ' � of the regulation provided th . e variance does not materially impair the effectiveness of the� zoning regulation as a whole,e, and, further, iithat the Board's action promotes substantialJustice* Board of Zoning Appeals, supra; Plumb v. Board of Zoni ng Aepeals, �! supra at p. 601. Thus, the hardship required for the granting of a variance exists where the application of the zoningregulation g ation to the particular parcel of land "greatly -decreases or practically destroys" its value for, -any perMIt.ted­use- and where-th . .-�---�.-..�.,_.a.�._._.-..._....�....�.�.e. .aPPl ication...--- - - - nance bears I so little relationship to the purpose of, P zoning that, as to the subject parcel,, the ordinance, in effect, ! is confiscatory or arbitrary. Lessner v. I Zoning Board of Appeals, 1151 Conn. 165 170-71 � (1963). It must be demonstrated to the Board that the har dship is peculiar to this particular land and that it is not merely 'e sly a 1 4 1 1 • 1 , general hardship equally applicable to other properties in the I neighborhood. Ward v. Zoning Board of ARReals, •supra; CymeUs I V. Zoning Board of Appeals, 151 Conn. 49, 50-51 (1963). The 11granted reason for this is that a variance, by its very•definition, is with respect to a particular piece'of property and, thus, may be enjoyed not only by the present owner but by all subsequent owners; a variance is not a personal, exemption from the enforce- 1 I� ment of the zoning regulation, it is a legal status granted to la certain iece f property without regard to ownership. Garibaldi ! v. Zoning Board of A peals, supra at p. 239. At the July 29, 1980 public hearing, the basis for the i� ,; claimed hardship was placed before the Board by the detailed state �iment of Mrs. Case's attorney in the presence of both the applicant t conclusion of the statement b her . sand opposing counsel. At he y I� attorney, Mrs. Case was asked by the Board chairman if there was ! anything she wished to add; her response was 'that -the attorney had "covered it all." Opposing counsel then addressed"the-Board T ( delivering an equally detailed statement as to why the opposition I contended the application should be denied. No formal or sworn ' testimony was offerdd by either side. Statements of counsel made 11 ' (' in open, public hearing where they are subject to question and 13 • I 1 1 i i I contradiction from the opposition are entitled to such weight � PP g and � credence as the Board deems them worthy the receive. McMahon v. +� Board of Zoning A,p,peeals, 140 Conn. 433, 435 (1953), citing ( Parsons v. Board of Zoning Appeals 140 Conn. 290 293 (1953) . t Here, the Board was entitled to accept the statements of counsel ' ! in lieu of sworn testimony and to afford them whatever weight it ,' deemed appropriate. 140 Conn. at p. 293. The applicant' s attorney stated to the Board that Mrs. Case i ; had the property for sale; the potential purchaser wished to construct a single family residence on the parcel; the land was wooded and a certain portion thereof came under the inland-wetlands legislation; � the potential buyer wished to place the residence on a portion of the land where it could not be seen from the road; the entire I property was in a historic district;. -.the-_pF-operty itself was, vastly � ' in excess of the amount of land normally required for a minimum �, -lot -in the area; thai the f50 foot frontage_on_Main Street^ tQuvsl._be - Tiused principally for a means of ingress and egress to the single ' family residence; and that the land had been "unproductive." The ," Board was fully aware that the pending sale of the land was conditioned upon the .obtaining of the- variance. - The Board also -- {' heard that there was no other practical use that the land could be (' put to other than a residential building lot; that it was open r - ;14 I I 1 space which produced no income, and, as the land was located ex- elusively in an area of residential homes, there existed no other i� reasonable permitted use. The Board was informed that the existing 3� economic hardship was not brought about by any action of the �i applicant (existingowner 2 and that the land and the proposed ) � � C P P : use) satisfied the zoning requirement in all respects, except as ; to the extent of frontage on Main Street. Thus, there were before I+ the Board sufficient facts of an economic hardship establishing ' that the land was not suitable for any permitted use other than �y the proposed building lot and that the denial of the variance i, would result in the land, for all practical purposes, having little . or no marketable value. From such facts, the Board could reason- ;' ably conclude that the application of the zoing regulation to this 1� ., particular piece of land greatly decreased or practically destroyed its -vaitie for any permitted use, and, that the application of the ' regulation, under these circumstances, was so minimally -related to the u oee of i the A� O residential zone that M--as to -tfiis land r P.. i'P the effect of the regulation was confiscatory or arbitrary.3 ii Plaintiffs argue that there was no evidence before the Board that the property could not be utilized for any other purpose "because of the topography of the land." The Board, . however, had 15 I 1 I I before it the statement of the applicant's counsel as it related ' !Ito the character of the subject land, the maps of the parcel and of the surrounding area, and it was aware of the size and dim nsions i� lof the property. Additionally, the Board members were entitled to' take into account their own knowledge of the condition of the land ,, and any facts about the area learned through personal observation. ' ': Cameo Park Homes.- Inc. v_-Planning & Zoning Commission, 150 Conn. 672, 679 (1963) ; Mrowka v. Board of Zoning A, 134 Conn. 149, 1154 (1947). The members of the Board were familiar with the zoning map and the ordinance; as their questions to the attorneys and the public indicated they were familiar with the subject land and the area in which it is located.4 Accordingly, the court , finds that the Board's conclusion regarding a peculiar and unusual hardship has reasonable support in the record. Our Supreme Court j,'has stated that a hardship resulting from a peculiar topography or condition of- the 'land constitutes the -unnecessary or unusual type- - of w_ y ._ J hardship contemplated by such zoning regulations. Plumb v. i } Board of Zoning A,Rpe ls,, supra at p. 601; Talmadge v. Board of. Zoning Appeals, 141 Conn. 639, 643-644 (1954). i Plaintiffs next-. contend that there-Is no basis in -the record for the Board's finding that the granting of the- variance would I 16 I I ' ` I I I 1 not be out of harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations, and, that the public health; safety, conve- nience, and property values, would be protected, not harmed. Such contention overlooks the fact that the Board was aware the property that ' was located in a residential zone,/the purpose of the variance was 1. to permit the construction of a single-family dwelling permitted I I ' I Ilin the A-40 district, that the parcel far exceeded the size re- quirement for a residential building lot in that district, the Pi dimensions of the land met all the minimum lot 'requirements of the i ' district in which it was located, and the only non-conformity was the extent of frontage on Main Street. Under such circumstances, ! the Board-could reasonably conclude that the granting of a street 1 ! frontage variance, permitting the construction of one single-family . . II:� r-esidencet would not- materially u set. the .com r- ehensive zoning Plan. ! With reference to public health, safety, convenience, welfare, and 11property values, plaintiffs' attorney, at the public hearing, s �jalluded briefly to the relationship of the street frontage require- Iment to police and fire protection, esthetic value, and good ! community planning. However, the Board was not required to accept i ! that brief comment of counsel and, again, could only rely on its down knowledge of the area, the zoning and area maps, and the I . i !I I� 17 it h ti• � I . r f (proposed use of the land in concluding that the public health, !safety, and property values would not be harmed ,by the granting lof the variance. Plaintiffs also assert that the Board, in granting a variances to permit fifty feet of street frontage in a zone requi ring one- I ;hundred fifty feet, exceeded its authority under Section 11.4.1.c i to grant variances from a "literal" enforcement of the ordinance. (; Plaintiffs argue that such a substantial variance of the front I 11footage requirement constitutes far more than simply varying the i "literal" enforcement of the zoning regulation. This contention, ; however, overlooks the facts and information before the Board i. concerning the dimensions of the land and the proposed use. In 1!considering the effect of the variance, the Board was aware that , I on the residence would be constructed/backland which satisfied all the milnim m diinension requiremenAs 'for a residential building lot. -The--Board was informed that -the -fifty--€oot=VOft ��- i waeVoF b7e used sorely for Ingress and~egreBa*---Tr"e portioti-o-f--t-he t - ;parcel on which the 'single-family residence was to be constructed Thad a boundary facing Main Street which exceeded the minimum lot I'width requirement; however, the varianco was required simply :because that boundary did not front on the public street. Under I such circumstances, it cannot be said that the Board exceeded its �r 18 I i i1 authority, or abused its discretion, in granting the variance to permit a 50-foot frontage. In this regard, the ,Board specifically found that the reduced street frontage would not detrimentally affect any adjacent properties or the residential character of the I loverall neighborhood. Plaintiffs also argue that the Board lacked authority to- place restricting conditions on the granting of the variance. Our Supreme Court has stated that the "right to attach reasonable conditions to the grant of a variance is not dependent upon express authorization from the law making body." Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of A,ppe_als, 141 Conn. 632, 636 (1954). The Court has approved conditions attached to variances which are 'I "reasonably designed to ensure public welfare and safety." Neilsen ' v. Zoning Board of ARReals, 150 Conn. 120, 124 (1964). The decision in Bora v ZoninR Board of Appeals, 161 Conn. 297 (1971) -- - - --- - - i s--itlapp i icabl t--s-itice- d---there-had- f �eendtttans-- I ffimIit�ng the ours o opera. on or a refa I �I-iquor ou'EZe w iic i ;under the General Statutes, could only be effected by a vote of a , town meeting or by the enactment of an ordinance. Here, the • �Iconditions imposed violated no provisign of the General Statutes Pand were reasonably consistent with the purpose and-character-of-the residential zone. 1 • I 1 • i IV For the reasons stated, the court concludes that (1) the 1. I Oudgment of the Superior Court, filed on or about April 21, 19800 sustaining the appeal from the denial of the first application for a variance, is not res iudicata as to this appeal; and, : (2) the Board, in granting the second application for a variance, I ' did not act arbitrarily, illegally, or in abuse of its adminis- ! trative discretion. S � Accordingly, judgment may enter dismissing the appeal. } I {i I r .�,r+ter.+.+..�.�--_•,._-•---�-�-,.— - .� .., _-.-.-..-_--.- - _-•-- .u.-_ - -----'-- -'•- . .-...-.,b--...r..-•......-..tr..-•--«......,.-.- +..-...-...-. -...-• .-- -^—•-_ K-_-• - '.' . I II • I 1 I . I 20 1 , I Footnotes I Defendant stresses that the Court in Wade'Dairy_ Inc_ stated that a prior judgment on the merits is 'res udicata with p j 8m ._._. , respect to any claims which actually were made or mijht have ` been made under the first cause of action. Here, it is not a question of whether the issues raised in this appeal were previously raised; rather, the issue presented is whether they ') ed in the prior proceedings.- were finally litigated and determined_... On the present record, it cannot be ascertained what issues ,I other than that of a "self-inflicted hardship" were considered by the Board, and determined. The reason stated by the Board would indicate that it concluded the hardship was self- inflicted and went no further; that is, the Board did not - determine_those, otter_ J.xsi relating- to__t.ha -iasuance.-o.f.-a variance which are being raised in this appeal. Additionally, where the zoning authority stated a reason for its action., the- ' reviewing court would have merely determined whether that assigned ground was supported by the administrative record and- if that reason was pertinent to the considerations which the authority was required to apply under the- zani-ng---r-egul.-a-tions-f- -- - - j+ §cnith v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 174 Conn. 323,- 325 (1978); I Goldberg vv.Zoning_ Co�ission, 173 Conn. 23, 25-26 (1977) . 12. As stated, the Court, in the previous appeal, held that the i s hardship was not self-imposed. At the public hearing on this , application, plaintiffs' counsel acknowledged that the Superior Court decision, upon becoming final, was the law of !; this case and, if the application were to be denied, the denial must be grounded upon "other reasons." 3. Plaintiffs rely on Laurel Beach Assn._ y. Zoning Board of Appeals, 166 Conn. 385 (1974) . However, in that case, there ' was no basis for a conclusion that the property reasonably e could not b put to any other permitted use and that, as a !! result of the application of the zoning regulation, its value - 11. ..was- greatly- decreased .or -practically .destroyed. Also, with jf reference to the acknowledged and fundamental rule of variances set forth at p. 388 of that decision, the Board here -specifi=.. cally articulated the "peculiar characteristic" of this hereinafter, property (topography) and, as stated/ the reasons given by the Board find support in the record and in the memberd personal , knowledge of the subject property. • 1 4. According to defendant's Brief, the Board consisted of r f "low _ I f I 1 , "veteran members" all of whom were long time residents of South I Windsor. One member who voted in favor of the application stated, on the record, that he had lived in`South Windsor for twenty-seven years. l; - ! 5. In view of the court's holding, it is not necessary to rule on f defendant Board's second special defense. In Parsons v. Board 1�I of Zoning Appeals,, 140 Conn. 290 (1953) , the zoning authority had considered the fact that similar variances had been granted I� in the past for similar uses in the same general neighborhood; upon appellate review, the Supreme Court decision implied that a Board's consideration of other similar variances was proper (� with respect to the changing character of the area. However, ! 4 -146 in Ward v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra at p. 1 5 , the _. . _-_.Courtr_diacuaaiMg- Parsoali statedr "The criteria discussed in the Parsons case might mislead :pro ert ..owners and nning_-offircials=- -=--_ ---_-�-- encouraging them to justify variances on the basis E that one piece of property is under just as great a hardship as another for which a variance has already been granted. It requires no great insight - to realize that such a practice can lead to a f i' r �1 chain reaction effect, reinforcing the justification for each new variance- on the ground that the 'whole area is changing'. board which aRRroves variances in such a fashion undertakes zoning le illation on an ad hoc basis and abuses the discretion with which it is vested. To the extent that [Parsons] approves this practice, we cannot follow it.,, li (Emphasis added) Defendant argues, however that he re ere the information on the other similar variances was j offered, not to show a c i hanging ! neighborhood, but to demonstrate -that a denial of this application ,' would constitute arbitrary action. In t ' his court a view, facts of other variances.are--not gee to-'the- Fpaal betaysg� untter - ;' War:,the granting of any application for a vari ance must stand or fall on its own merits, as derived solely f __ , _ _..�_..�► , lished before the Board. Cf. Hi hland Park Inc. v. Zon ing nina Board ilof Appeals, 155 Conn. 40, 43.44 (196) . t !, 24 4 ~N aps � _ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 e•c AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 5, 1993 John Collins Building Inspector Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 9 re: Historic District Jurisdiction - property at 1742 Main Street Dear John: The town attorney, Ralph Alexander, has determined that the Historic District Commission has no jurisdiction over the construction of a house which falls outside of the boundary of the Historic District. The Historic District Commission will have jurisdiction on the portion of the property within the district boundaries. We expect the owners to contact the Commission in the future regarding any use of the property within the Historic District. Sincerely, Peter Walsh Commissioner cc: John Guff, Colonial Builders FEBlic—5-'.%(9 12 2 0 8 1994 South Windsor BUILDING DEPAR I MENT PERMIT N DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT 23f3 Application is hereby: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT. APPROVED DISAPPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 Ext. 230 Date 1a1A Inspector Application must be printed or typed 1 . LOCATION OF JOB Z y� �'- j FEE $CIIEDULE No . Street $ 0 - $19000 - $10.00 Floor Apt, No. Over $1,000 - $10.00 j per $1 ,000 or 2 . OWNER �lD,c: 1c , fraction thereof 3. ADDRESS Alidej:", 4. APPLICANT ��y-- ��G�12 C- 5. ADDRESS �` //� (T r�w20 ) 6. ESTIMATED COST $ 4�0 j!V D o0 7. IS THIS A CONTRACT COST x a o 8. FEE ENCLOSED $ OD #72f1-7s' j 9. TYPE OF BUILDING: RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL 10. TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Additi n/Repair RD 3A 11 iee APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from Reverse Side) A '7 11 . LOCATION OF JOB_ 171 NO. STREET APT. NO , 12 . TYPE OF INSTALLATION 13 . SIZE OF MAIN FEEDER 14 . NO . OF LIGHT LOOPS 15 . NO. OF HEAT LOOPS 16. NO . OF POWER LOOPS 17 . NO. OF LIGHT OUTLETS_______ 18 . NO . OF HEAT CIRCUITS 19 . NO . OF POWER OUTLETS_ 20 . NO . OF CONVENIENCE OUTLETS 21. NO. OF HEAT CIRCUITS 22 . NO. OF POWER CIRCUITS 23 . NO. OF LIGHT CIRCUITS 24. SIZE OF HEAT CIRCUITS� 25 . NO. OF MOTORS_ 26 . NO . OF PANELS 27 . TOTAL WATTAGE 28 . NO. OF POWER FEEDERS 29 . NO. OF SWITCHES_ 30 . A/C LOAD 3-3 31. SIZE OF POWER FEEDERS_ 32. NO . OF FIXTURES�'U 33. TOTAL HORSEPOWER_ 34 . NAME OF SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR TRADES 35 . REMARKS AND FURTHER DETAILS : LICENSE NO. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE PHONE NUMBER: 7 �l�/ i."-�'�:::�Vw�i� t�,i ,�q i'�ild���,,�'4,k,.��1��,,� t Ir ,i- 9� I' +�d'��.��sw+..•�I.L�.�yy„��Yl „�l{•�bw, #�y� INSPECTOR J DATE TIME _ 2 ' LOCATION ���� f"'�'''� S7 INSPECTION: CODE: RESULT(D/A) : BUILDING: ELECTRICAL: �l f PLUMBING: HVAC: OTHER: Suburban Propan Quantum 90 Macktown Road • P.O. Box 220 • Windsor, CT 06095 203.683.0769 DATE- JOB NAME: (;;2- c�1 STARTING DATE: CONIRACTOR S AGENT: ��/�✓ TO: CITY/'TOWN OF:PLEASEPLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE ABOVE REE YR CED AGENT HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM YOUR BUILDING DEPAR'II-M FOR THE SPECIFIED PROJECIP IN 'THE NAME OF THE CONTRACTOR. SIGNED �,,��.�� F' 4f � LICENSE # 308608 41./Wemo from TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN HALL SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074 TO Love Electric DATE 4/05/94 616 Merrow Road Tolland, CT 06084 L SUBJECT: Appl. Electrical Permit--1742 Main Street I FOLD- i Mr. Love: We are returning your Electrical Application & check for $80.00. According to your application the estimated cost is $8500. 00. Therefore, the cost for fee would be $90.00 ($10. 00 per thousand and every fraction thereof) . Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, by returning the Application with corrected fee. JAI i sy C. H. Murray Rii i 1 d ina Denartment PERMIT NO. DEPARTMENT DECISION A P P L I CAT ION FOR Application is hereby : PLUMBING PERMIT TOWM OF SOUTH WINDSOR APPROVED DISAPPROVED BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT. tZ tijAL 644-2511 Ext. 230 D a t e u I n s p e c t o r Application must be printed or typed. 1. LOCATION OF JOB: FEE SCHEDULE 2. OWNER:. /-sL�ry`a $ 0 - $l,000 - $10.00 3. ADDRESS: Over $1 ,000 - $10.00 per $1 ,000 or 4. APPLICANT: -- fraction thereof rid ��.�/Vr� 5. ADDRE S S: 6. EST. COST: $ �' 7. IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? is NO 8. FEE ENCLOSED: $ 9. TYPE OF BUILDING: � f � �� _RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL 10. TYPE OF JOB: ORIGINAL ALTERATION INSTALLATION ADDITION REPAID. BD 2A 11/88 APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT (Cont. from Reverse Side) 11. LOCATION OF JOB: IZ4=2 P11A( t GENERAL PLUMBING 12. KIND OF INSTALLATION: ht(,) J6f p o g e 13. SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN l 0 14. NO. OF TOILETS_ -STYLE 15. NO. OF URINALS STYLE 16. NO. OF BATHTUBS__ 16A. NO. OF SHOWERS 17. NO. OF LAVATORIES 1 Q 18. NO. OF SINKS- 19. DISPOSAL 19A. DISWASHER�_ 20. NO. OF CONDUCTORS f SIZE 21. NO. OF STACKS _SIZE 22. AREA OF ROOF 23. NO. OF CATCH BASINS 24. NO. OF FLOOR DRAINS 25. NO. OF OTHER FIXTURES KIND 26. ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY A WINDOW? 27. SIZE OF WINDOW 28. IF NO WINDOW, WHAT KIND OF VENTILATION IS THERE? 29. SIZE OF DUCTS 30. OSEWERR SEPTIC TANK? 31. SIZE OF WATER MAIN /c�� �j�c.(� 31A. SIZES OF WATER PIPING & RISERSc� 32. REMARKS AND FURTHER DETAILS WATER HEATER 33. TYPE ?��},� Q, l/r 34. MANUFACTURER TANKS SAFETY DEVICES TEMPERATURE 9 35. CAPACITY 6� ( -m� 39. RELIEF VALVE / 5-0 36. TEST PRESSURE LBS. 40. MANUFACTURER 37. WORKING PRESSURE LBS. 41. PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE 38. TYPE 42. MANUFACTURER LICENSE NO. DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PHONE NO. 9.3 2 g � �. ( �u4�, t���. s � R7 ao, � �• °"t4•a,-w'§,; >� _ - ' .gyp` ,4 •, S+e to f "L" ' • u' [ , T, a "` i -, „ ' t'P ';��� ! '•, fi1r �; `s Jar 644P623�r » �. 41130 r r 10 , io.00 , $ +fir Ira LOCATION OF B I1LWD3� _ Noe t : a 4, / A4 �AW T49 HV C1COMACTOR AMMSS TOWN N N TYPE OF SYSTEM: HEATING TYPE OF BUILDING: RESIDENTIAL_' A/C COMMERCIAL , - VENTILATION BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL _..__ IF HEATING: STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS, HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HYDRONIC WARM AIR UNIT RADIANT HEATER (INCLUDING WOOD COAL BURNING STOVE) TYPE OF FUEL: OIL-GPM GAS IN-PUT ELECTRIC KW WOOD COAL OIL TANK - SIZE & LOCATION INSIDE_ OUTSIDE_ CAPACITY LPG TANK - CAPACITY_ - EXISTING RADIATION_ ADDITIONAL ION TOTAL RADIATION_ DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE IF INSIDE F DIFFERENCE °F TOTAL HEAT LOSS (BTUH) (HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST AC CO APPL TION DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE & MODEL NO.): C9 �I G OSS HEATING CAPACITY (INPUT-BTUH) NET RATING (OUTPUT-BTUH)` lea Y IF AIR CONDITIONING: DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE' pD°F IN E�F DIFFERENCE F TOTAL HEAT GAIN (BTUH) (HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST A COMPANY PLICATION) DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING MAKE A MODEL NO.): �_/el Z' f-ev- I,� NNAGEF COOLING CAPACITY (BTUH) W Of IF VENTILATION: DESCRIBE ALL AIR-HANDLING EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUSE EQUIPMENT): TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM (CFM) FRESH AIR INTAKE (CFM) (PLAN MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION) The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to perform the following work and is to comply with all local ordinances and State of Conn. Building Codes in the performance of such work. FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK: / Ab STATE LI SE - NAME & TYPE It DATE MNAITRE OF PLIC T APPROVED DATE I - B - R CALCULATION SHEET 1503 (Modern Method) Copyright 1971 by The Hydronlcs Institute OWNER ADDRESS DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE F. DATE COL.A COL.9 COL.C COL.D COL.E COL.F COL.G 1 ROOM _ Q O H L W H L W H L W H L W H L W Design Water Temp. 2 ROOM DIMENSIONS, FT. ~ -- U STUN per F 1 1 3 LENGTH EXPOSED WALLS,FT. < Radiation Selected 4 WINDOW AND OUTSIDE DOOR AREA v STUN STUH STUN STUN STUN 5 WALL CONSTRUCTION ROOM LIN. FT.Of (Table 9,Line 3 x H 1 _ TOTALS RADIATION 6 TYPE OF GLASS FROM LINE 12 SELECTED (B it in of table used tar Line 5) 7 CEILING CONSTRUCTION C (Table 9, L x W) f) FLOOR CONSTRUCTION1 _ O— (Table 9, L x W or Lin. F t l E 9 COLD PARTITION CONSTRUCTION f (Table 9,L x H) -- G 10 -C 1 Wall(With Openings) c; 2 Wells(With Openings) Z X H 3 W all s I W rth Openings)or E nt.H all 11 TOTAL BTUH AT 70F TEMP DIFFERENCE' 12 TOTAL BTUH AT DESIGN TEMP DIFFERENCE K --- COL.A — -- -__ COLS COL.H — COL.1 COL^J — COL.K COL.L TOTAL BTUH TOTAL 1 ROOM OF SUILDING RADIATION tt — - -- AT SELECTED O H L W H L W H L W H L W H L W DESIGN TEMP.• 2 ROOM DIMENSIONS. FT -- DIFFERENCE U -- — 3 LENGTH EXPOSED WALLS, FT < 4 WINDOW AND OUTSIDE DOOR AREA STUN STUN STUN BTUH BTUH 5 WALL CONSTRUCTION •INCREASE BATHROOM (Table 9,Line 3 x HI TOTAL 20% 6 TYPE OF GLASS (Bottom f table used tar Line 51 7 CEILING CONSTRUCTION --- — — - IFOR CONCRETE FLOOR ON ( GROUND OR FILL AT Table 9, L x WI GRADE LEVEL,USE LINEAR B FLOOR CONSTRUCTIONt FEET OF EXPOSED EDGE (Table 9,L x W or Lin Ft 1 9 COLD PARTITION CONSTRUCTION (Table 9,L x H) 10 C 1 Wall(With Openings) O 0 ------ -- ---- ---- --- -- - - ------- — — 2 Wells(With Openings) G x — -- - - -- ---- — ------ — 3 Wells I W rth Openings) r Ent Hall 4. 11 TOTAL BTUH AT 70F TEMP DIFFERENCE' 12 TOTAL BTUH AT DESIGN TEMP DIFFERENCE — FORM 1503 This form Is available from The Hydronlc•Institute 36 Russo Place,Berkeley Helghtt,N J 07922 i AIR�k��r C& R '50 furH faNhVG&y 11-01-9 4 1lltjy �Q&Sp?ejr 4T1NG 60601903 . 15 ft*i Cr reox8 SUMMARY REPORT -------------- i Prepared For : Prepared By • i COLONIAL BUILDERS 165 RIVER ROAD RICHARD RODZIEWICZ WEST WILLINGTON , CT 06279 C&R AIR COND & HEATINGJob Name : DISALVATORE DESIGN CONDITIONS for WEST WILLINGTON OUTDOO'k INDOOR SUMMER WINTER SUMMER WINTER Dry Bulb 100 0 78 68 Wet Bulb 75 60 Daily Range 20 Daily Swing 3 .0 Latitude 39 Elevation 465 Safety Factor (%) 10 Latent Factor (%) 24 Room Sens•j�le Name Heating Heating Cooling Cooling ---- BTUH CFM BTUH CFM Bedroom 2 111614 ---162 --4 ,906 ---248 Bedroom 3 109767 151 5 ,499 278 GALLERY 0 0 0 0 BEDROOM 5 11 ,252 157 41826 244 BEDROOM 4 111733 164 5 ,450 275 MAIDS ROOM 5 ,606 78 31442 174 BATHS 6&4 67331 89 2 ,585 131 BATHS 2&3 182 3 54 3 WALK IN CLOSETI 81564 120 32582 181 FOYER 7 )318. 102 3 ,219 163 FAMILY.�OOM CEI 81975 126 4 ,515 228 ------- ------- ------- ------- 82 ,340 1 ,152 389077 1 ,923 HEATING DELTA T 65 .0 COOLING DELTA T 18.0 M1*fin F ZON; . 60601903 . 15 t~ = DETAILED REPORT FOR ENTIRE HOUSE 'repared For : Prepared By : -COLONIAL BUILDERS RICHARD RODZIEWICZ 165 RIVER ROAD C&R AIR COND & HEATING WEST WILLINGTON , CT 06279 Job Name : DISALVATORE EXPOSURE GLASS NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NE/NW SE/SW HORZ. TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------- AREA 1i 909 9911 3011 159 ON 01i 09 23411 COOLING 1i 196749 2 ,63311 1 94589 72911 09 Oii 09 6 ,49411 HEATING I 1 ,6711i 1 ,8389 5579 2789 Oil Oil 09 4 ,3449 BELOW WALLS NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NE/NW SE/SW GRADE TOTAL ' - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- i AREA 11 415189 3 2939 2 402fl 1 77711 ON 09 09 %11 ,99011 i COOLING 17 ,737 526409 4 ,114ii 390439 Oil 09 09 20 ,5341i HEATING 11 18 3979 13 4099 9 7 8111 7 ,236fl Oil 011 011 48 ,82211 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOORS NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NE/NW SE/SW TOTAL - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AREA 9 Oil ON 0ii ON ON ON 1i 09 COOLING 1i 09 09 Oii Oil 09 09 9 Oil HEATING I ON Oil 09 0ii Oil 0ii N Oil ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- FLOOR AREA COOLING HEATING --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2530 1i 446 it 1 ,517 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CEILING AREA COOLING HEATING --------------------------------------------------------------------------- , 2530 11 1 7251 11 4 ,252 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MISCELLANEOUS COOLING LOADS --------------------------- People Sensible Load 0 Latent Load 89430 Lights & Appl. Load 0 Latent Safety Btuh 843 Ventilation Load 0 y Duct Heat Gain 5 ,608 Inf iltration Load 792 Sensible Safety Btuh 2 ,952 TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD 381077 TOTAL LATENT LOAD 9 ,273 Summer ACH 0 .08 Temp. Swing Mul t. 1 .00 *** Total Cooling Load 47 ,350 BTUH Or 3 .95 Tons *** MISCELLANEOUS HEATING LOADS --------------------------- Infiltration Load 49894 Ventilation Load 0 Duct Heat Loss 121128 Safety Btuh 6 ,383 Winter ACH 0 .25 *** Total Heating Load 82 ,340 BTUH *** AMOff 's.• 4:z II 1I i 6 11-01-94 60601903 . 15 SUMMARY REPORT -------------- Prepared For : Prepared By: COLONIAL BUILDERS RICHARD RODZIEWICZ 165 RIVER ROAD C&R AIR COND & HEATING i WEST WILLINGTON , CT 06279 Job Name : DISALVATORE DESIGN CONDITIONS for WEST WILLINGTON OUTDOOR INDOOR SUMMER WINTER SUMMER WINTER Dry Bulb 100 0 78 68 Wet Bulb 75 60 Daily Range 20 Daily Swing 3 .0 Latitude 39 Elevation 465 Safety Factor (%) 10 Latent Factor (%) 24 • Sensible Room Heating Heating Cooling Cooling Name BTUH CFM BTUH CFM ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- THIRD FLOOR 44 ,967 629 19 ,109 965 44 ,967 629 199109 965 HEATING DELTA T 65 .0 COOLING DELTA T 18 .0 11-01-94 _ 60601903 .15 DETAILED REPORT FOR ENTIRE HOUSE pared For: Prepared B SON IAL BUILDERS ,5 RIVER ROAD RICHARD RODZIEWICZ ,EST WILLINGTON CT 06279 C&R AIR COND & HEATING Job Name : DISALVATORE • GLASS--- NORTH SOUTH EAST EXPOS WEST N ------------------------------------E/NW---SE�SW--_HORZ_- TOTAL AREA 11 ON 459 ON 011 0� p¶ ---------- COOLING I Oti 1 ,19711 p¶ p¶ Ott 459 HEATING 11 01i 83511 p� 011 O11 O11 1 ,19 71i oil Off Oil 835% WALLS-- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST BELOW -------------------------------------m----------- GRADE TOTAL AREA 11 1 ,920% 124271 1 ,344U 123449 1 ,47211 p¶____'----------- OR COOLING 11 3 ,2889 2 ,444fi 2 ,302t1 223029 295211 Oti Off 12 , 561 7 ,85611 _HEATING 11- ---7 98189 5181111 514731 524731 5 ,99411 p 11 1 Oti 301567t1 DOORS-- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST------------------------------------ ------------------------------------NE-NW-----m--------_ TOTAL AREA 11 011 Oii 011 p� 011 ON ------------ COOLING 11 01i Oil 011 p� Oil of t1 Oil -HEATING 11 Oil 09 O11 011 Oii 11 pil ------------------------ _ -- 0i ¶ Oti FLOOR---- AREA ----COOLING -------------------------------- ------------------------------------------HEATING----------------- CEILING AREA COOLING--------------------------------- HEATING ----------------- ¶ ----- ¶ -- --- ----- 1' --- ------ --------- - 776 447 S21 � ---------------------------------------------------- MIS CELLANEOUS COOLING LOADS �! People Sensible Load 0 Latent Load " 4 ,231 '---- Lights & App1, Load ' Ventilation Load O Latent Safety Btuh 423 Duct Heat Gain 2 ,815 Inf iltration Load 313 Sensible Safety Btuh 1 ,481 TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD 19 ,109 TOTAL LATENT LOAD Summer ACH 0 . 13 4 ,654 Temp. Swing Mul t. 1 .00 *** Total Cooling Load 23 ,763 BTUH Or 1 .98 Tons ** MISCELLANEOUS HEATING LOADS -------- __ ____ Infiltration Load 11935 Ventilation f Duct Heat Loss ion Load 6 ,623 Safety Btuh 0 Winter ACH 0 . 25 3 ,486 I *** Total Heating Load 44 ,967 BTUH ** i ©c 3 5, 11-01-94 60601903 . 15 SUMMARY REPORT -------------- Prepared For : Prepared By : COLONIAL BUILDERS RICHARD RODZIEWICZ 165 RIVER ROAD C&R AIR COND & HEATING WEST WILLINGTON , CT 06279 Job Name : DISALVATORE DESIGN CONDITIONS for WEST WILLINGTON OUTDOOR INDOOR SUMMER WINTER SUMMER WINTER Dry Bulb 100 0 78 68 Wet Bulb 75 60 Daily Range 20 Daily Swing 3 .0 Latitude 39 Elevation 465 Safety Factor (%) 10 Latent Factor M 24 Sensible Room Heating Heating Cooling Cooling Name BTUH CFM BTUH CFM MASTER BEDROOM 201836 291 99714 491 MASTER BATH&CLO 171149 240 59898 298 STUDY 82222 115 31847 194 Living Room 11 ,127 156 32536 179 Family Room 141681 205 61387 323 FOYER 21 9608 302 7 9785 393 DINING AREA 141136 198 5 ,800 293 Kitchen 51949 83 22399 121 Dining Room 101658 1493 ,392 ---171- ------- --- - ------- 1249368 11739 48 ,757 21462 HEATING DELTA T 65 .0 COOLING DELTA T 18.0 �0:, . 11-01-9 4 60601903 15 `, LL DETAILED REPORT FOR ENTIRE HOUSE Prepared For • • - ' COL Prepared By : COLONIAL BUILDERS 165 RIVER ROAD RICHARD RODZIEWICZ WEST WILLINGTON CT 06279 C&R AIR COND & HEATING Job Name : DISALVATORE EXPOSURE GLASS NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NE/NW SE/SW HORZ. - ----------------------------- TOTAL AREA 11 117 2561i ------------TOOT-- ---TOOT-- AREA G 1i 2 17 7 68 Oil 309 0¶ -- 011 --- pil 4039 HEATING 1( 2 ,17211 4p752� 01 1 ,45811 Oti O11 011 10 ,44411 ----------------------------------------------------------- ---- 0¶ ----- 1 BELOW WALLS -_---NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NE/NW SE/SW GRADE TOTAL AREA 9 %10 0731i 7 ,8949 1 ,60011 2 67011 ��----------------TOOT-- COOLING ti 12 ,6�1ti 9 ,94611 2 ,016ti 3 ,36411 Oil Oti %22 ,237 HEATING-11 30 217511 2326479 427931 7 ,99811 OR 0� Oil 28 ,017 ---------------------TOOT-- _ 0¶ OR 66 ,613 DOORS------NORTH---SOUTH EAST WEST----NE�NW --SE/SW-----------TOTAL--- TOTAL AREA 1 09 0� 011 --0�------0-------011 --------------- COOLING I OR 01 09 01T 09 t1 011 HEATING 11 OR 01i 011 0,1 i1 011 - ----------------------------------------��------011------0¶ -TOOT-� 011 FLOOR AREA ---TOOT-- -----------------------------------COOLING---TOOT--HEATINGTOOT-- -------------------2744------¶-----------�---------� 13 ,508 CEILING---_--_-----AREATOOT- COOLING HEATING------------------ -- --- -------------------2744 9 1 ,019 ¶TOOT---3 ,465-----------TOOT-- MISCELLANEOUS COOLING LOADS ---- ------------ i People Sensible Load 0 Latent Load Lights & Appl• Load 0 10 ,718 Ventilation Load Latent Safety Btuh 1 072 0 Duct Heat Gain 3 ,688 Infiltration Load 1 493 Sensible Safety Btuh 4 ,097 TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD 48 ,757 Summer ACH TOTAL LATENT LOAD 11 ,790 011 . Temp. Swing Mult• 1 .00 *** Total Cooling Load 602547 BTUH Or 5 .05 Tons MISCELLANEOUS HEATING LOADS -------------------------- Infiltration Load 92229 Ventilation Duct Heat Loss 14 042 Load 0 Safety Btuh Winter ACH 0 .25 10 2030 *** Total Heating Load124 ,368 BTUH **k .r i PERMIT # DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT Application is hereby : TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ;PPROVED DISAPPROVED BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT.644-2511 Ext . 230L Application must be printed typed . a e nsp for i. LOCATIO F JOB FEE SCHEDULE Street $ 0 - $19000 - $10.00 ,L15 Floor Apt . No. Over $1 ,000 - 1 $10.00 T r per $1,000 or 2 . OWNER Colonial Builders fraction there 3. ADDRESS 165 River Rd. illin ton C . 4. AP ICANT LnVP F.1 art ri r 5 . ADDRESS 16 Merrow Rd. Tolland Ct. 0 4 6. ESTIMATED COST, n nn ,,N 7 . IS THIS A CONTRACT COS No 8. FEE ENCLOSED 9. TYPE OF BUILDING : XXX RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL r 10. TYPE OF JOB : yx_Original Installation f Alteration/Addition/Repair BD3A11/88 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from Reverse Side) 11 . LOCATION OF JOB 1742 Main St. NO . STREET APT. NO 12 . TYPE OF INSTALLATION wiring for new house 13 . SIZE OF MAIN FEEDER 2-200 amp panels from a 320 amp meter box 14 . NO . OF LIGHT LOOPS 20 15 . NO. OF HEAT LOOPS 2 16. NO. OF POWER LOOPS 6 17 . NO. OF LIGHT OUTLETS 120 18 . NO . OF HEAT CIRCUITS_ 19 . NO. OF POWER OUTLETS_ 20. NO. OF CONVENIENCE OUTLETS 130 21. NO. OF HEAT CIRCUITS 22 . NO. OF POWER CIRCUITS_ 23. NO. OF LIGHT CIRCUITS 20 24 . SIZE OF HEAT CIRCUITS1s amp 25 . NO. OF MOTORS 26 . NO. OF PANELS- 27 . TOTAL WATTAGE 28 . NO. OF POWER FEEDERS 29 . NO. OF SWITCHES 30. A/C LOAD 80 amps 31. SIZE OF POWER FEEDERS z 32 . NO. OF FIXTURES 12n 33 . TOTAL HORSEPOWER 34 . NAME OF SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR TRADES 35 . REMARKS AND FURTHER DETAILS : E-1 104950 LICENSE NO. I-qTNIURE OF APPLICANT DATE PHONE NUMBER: 875-9686 12-5-94 To who it may concer_ ,this is my notifcation to recind my electrical permit for 1742 Main St South Windsor Ct. Jeffrey J. Love Owner of Love Electric PERMIT l DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT 1135 Application is hereby : TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT. APPROVED DISAPPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE 644-2511 Ext. 230 a e u g Inspector Application must be printed or typed 1 . LOCATION OF JOB 1-7 '-/:Z 0(d MOOP SiN FEE SCHEDULE No . Street $ 0 - $19000 - $10.00 Floor Apt. No. Ov r $1,000 - $10.00 2 . OWNER C01061%tL [� ` �'+U✓� per $1 ,000 or '$� y�fraction thereof 3. ADDRESS 4. APPLICANT D_r M & I G 5, ADDRESS if�(1 �`✓Z U cZS r�(Ou n _ C�CQD 3� 6. ESTIMATED COST $ aU 7. IS THIS A CONTRACT COST X _ Ye• No 8. FEE ENCLOSED $ �0 W 9. TYPE OF BUILDINCs RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL 10. TYPE OF JOB: Original Installation Alteration/Addition/Repair Rn 3A 11/88 APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from Reverse Side) 11 . LOCATION OF JOB �y� 0 lei /Gti/u �, NO. STREET APT. NO , 12 . TYPE OF INSTALLATION 13 . SIZE OF MAIN FEEDER 14 . NO . OF LIGHT LOOPS 15 . NO. OF HEAT LOOPS 16 . NO . OF POWER LOOPS 17 . NO. OF LIGHT OUTLETS 18 . NO . OF HEAT CIRCUITS 19 . NO. OF POWER OUTLETS 20 . NO. OF CONVENIENCE OUTLETS 21. NO. OF HEAT CIRCUITS 22 . NO. OF POWER CIRCUITS 23 . NO. OF LIGHT CIRCUITS 24. SIZE OF HEAT CIRCUITS 25 . NO. OF MOTORS 26 . NO . OF PANELS 27 . TOTAL WATTAGE 28 . NO . OF POWER FEEDERS 29 . NO. OF SWITCHES 30. A/C LOAD 31. SIZE OF POWER FEEDERS 32 . NO . OF FIXTURES 33. TOTAL HORSEPOWER 34 . NAME OF SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR TRADES 35 . REMARKS AND FURTHER DETAILS : Ns 4o Ye?keN, 6 A u4r-� kt, C:'� � 11 C a-+ N N Q a 0 Y� i.�c+L 7";-Cf.ems 4?eQ S� 1, k 4 LICENSE NO. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE PHONE NUMBER: 6577 8�0)a1 R AC E v/pia,a o KA S TANDBY jq .I N C OR P O R A T E D SYSTEMS CSAPSS80OO/N PSS200001A AUTOMATIC 1 ' ' oC== TRANSFER _ i' i 1 0 •� SWITCH e e 1 11 1 o G- Ij- 01 0 Engine Generator Set 0 Automatic Transfer Switch Fo iivco INSTALLATIONOPERATORS MANUAL I N C O R P O R A T E D AND 0 225 SOUTH CORDOVA AVE LE CENTER MN 56057 612-357.6831 TESTING POLICY: A.T.S. as standard equipment. The A.T.S. also contains the power failure sensing circuitry necessary to send a Before any generator is shipped from the factory, it is fully start/stop signal to the engine generator set. checked for performance. The generator is loaded to its ci 2) ENGINE/GENERATOR full cap acity.ty. and the voltage. current, and frequency are carefully checked. PSS8000- The engine generator set consists of a Briggs Rated output of generators is based on engineering tests of & Stratton Vanguard, two cylinder OHV, air cooled typical units, and is subject to, and limited by, the tem- engine equipped to run on L.P./N.G. fuel. The engine perature. altitude. fuel. and other conditions specified by operates at 3600 rpm and frequency regulation is the manufacturer of the applicable engines. maintained by the engine governor within 4 cycles variation (62.5 Hz - 58.5 Hz) from no load to rated load. INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION The 8000 watt (8kW) generator is a brushless. single bearing. direct drive. rotating field design. The generator Is connected to the engine's tapered (quill) crankshaft The package standby engine-generator set includes all extension. The engine generator is mounted in a NEMA Items necessary for a completely automatic standby 311 enclosure for outside installation. Connection boxes power system as standard equipment. The entire are provided to all customer connections (both AC package is then tested to insure proper operation of all output and DC control). A customer supplied 12 Volt. components and the total systems performance and re- 235 CCA(BCI group U1) battery is required to complete liability. the installation. Engine operation is controlled by an Electronic Engine Control Module (E.C.M.) mounted in DESCRIPTION the engine generator enclosure. The E.C.M. is equipped standard with a 10 second start delay. 3 minute cool This packaged power system is designed to automatically down delay and 5 cycles of 12 second on/12 second off provide standby power to unattended loads during cranking• electrical outages. Upon an interruption of normal electrical service this packaged power systems electrical PSS20000- The engine generator set consists of a Ford control circuits will automatically start the engine. The Industrial, four cylinder, water cooled engine equipped generator will produce electrical power and the Auto- to run on L.P./N.G. fuel. The engine operates at 3600 matic Transfer Switch ULT.S.) will automatically transfer rpm and frequency regulation is maintained by the th electrical loads to the engine-generator set: Upon engine governor within 3 cycles variation (61.5 Hz - 58.5 restoration of normal electrical service the emergency Hz)from no load to rated load. The 20.000 watt(20M transfer switch will sense return of the normal commer- generator is a single bearing, direct drive. rotating arm cial power. The Automatic Transfer Switch will retrans- design. The generator is connected to the engine fly- fer the load back to normal commercial power source. wheel via a flexible drive disk. The engine generator is The engine control circuits will begin a 3 minute cool- mounted in a drip proof enclosure for outside installa- down cycle. after which the fuel supply will be shut off tion. Connection boxes are provided to all customer con- and the engine ignition system disabled. nections (both AC output and DC control). A customer supplied 12 Volt, 500 CCA(BCI group 24) battery is re- These packaged power systems consist of quired to complete the installation. Engine operation is two major components: controlled by an Electronic Engine Contrr 1 Module (E.C.M.) mounted in the engine generator enclosure. 1) AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH The E.C.M. is equipped standard with a 10 second start delay. 3 minute cool down delay and 5 cycles of 12 PSS8000- 100/50 AMP wall mounted Automatic seconds on/12 seconds off cranking. Transfer Switch )LT.S.) designed for inside installation. ••NOTICE•• The A.T.S. consists of a 100 AMP line side contactor and a 50 AMP generator side contactor. The contactors are This unit will automatically transfer if a power outage both electrically and mechanically interlocked. An occurs while running in an exercise mode. aut matic taper battery trickle charger (40 MA max) and a seven day electronic exerciser clock are installed in the SPECIFICATIONS A.T.S. as standard equipment. The A.T.S. also contains the power failure sensing circuitry necessary to send a start/stop signal to the engine generator set. GENERATOR PSS20000- 225/100 AMP wall mounted Automatic MODEL WATTS• VOLTS AMPS* HZ PH RPM Transfer Switch (A.T.S.) designed for inside installation. PSS8000 8,000 120/240 33.3 60 1 3600 The A.T.S. consists of a 225 AMP line side contactor and PSS20000 20.000 120/240 83.0 60 1 3600 a 100 AMP generator side contactor. The contactors are PSS20000-4 20,000 120/208 55.6 60 3 3600 both electrically and mechanically interlocked. An PSS20000-17 20.000 120/240 48.1 60 3 3600 automatic taper battery trickle charger (40 MA max) and *berate 10% for Natural Gas operation. Derate 3.5% per a seven day electronic exerciser clock are installed in the 1000 feet elevation above sea level. 22060 Page 2 60706-111 FUEL CONSUMPTION "Concealed Damage" is understood to mean damage to the NG (1,000 BTU/cU FT) L.P.VAPOR (2.520 BTU/CU FT) contents of a package which is not in eviderr'ce at th MODEL CF/HR BTU/HR #/HR GAL/HR CF/HR BTU/HR time of delivery by the carrier, but which is discovered PSS8000 200 200.000 11.4 17 97.6 246.000 later. The carrier or carriers are responsibl f r mer- PSS20000 325 325.000 16.8 4.0 142 358.000 chandise last r damaged in transit. The title to goods rests with the consignee when generators are shipped L.P. TANK SIZING fob factory,and only the consignee can legally file a claim. Minimum required L.P. Tank size for L.P. Vapor with- drawal operating at various outside temperatures given CAUTION **** in degrees fahrenheit (celsius) The PS88000 is shipped without oil. The PSS20000 Is TANK TEMPERATURE shipped with oil. and a 50/50 mix of coolant. Be sure to MODEL 60 ft 16 c) 30 f(0 c) 0 f(-18) .20 11-29 c) check all f luld levels before operating. See engine manu- PSS8000 70 Gal. 80 Gal. 200 Gal. 700 Gal. facturer's Instruction manual for recommended oil re- PSS20000 100 Gal. 150 Gal. 500 Gal. 1500 Gal. quirements before initial starting. ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS: UNPACKING: Refer to engine operating and maintenance instructions • NOTICE * 1.Carefully remove the carton. Regarding Engines - This manual covers the generator 2.After inspecting the engine-generator for external portion of these units. See the separate engine instruc- physical damage. check for the following items packed tion manual for engine-related problems, detailed engine inside the carton. information and engine warranty. a.Ownees manual, wiring diagram and parts list. 11 CAUTION * b.Engine manufacturer's instruction manual. c.USDA approved spark arrestor (PSS8000 only) B sure to check the engine oil level frequently, as specified 4.Remove main frame hold down bolts, (4). In the engine manual. 5.Unit can now be lifted from shipping rails. ['he engine manufacturer has established an excellent INSTALLATION world-wid engin service organization: engine service is available from a nearby authorized dealer or distributor: check the yellow pages of the telephone directory under General Information "engines,"or ask the dealer from whom you purchased th power plant sssssssssssss sssss WARNING ssss %e rated power of each engine-generator is limited by the ss****sss**** temperatur . altitude and all other ambient conditions specified by the engine manufacturer. Engine power will Before proceeding with the installation, be sure the opera- decrease 3-1/2% f r each 1000 ft. above sea level, and will decrease an additional 1% for each 10 degrees tlon selector switch is to the stop position. fa►hrenheit above 60 degrees fahrenheit. These engine/generator sets are designed to be mounted JNPACKING INSTRUCTIONS on a concrete pad outdoors only. The transfer switch is mounted next to your distribution panel inside the building. Consult a qualified. licensed electrician or con- ` NOTICE tractor to install and wire the transfer switch. The Vhen u installation must comply with all national. state and repacking th generator set. be sure to inspect It local codes. carefully forfreight loss or damage. jr loss or damage Is noted at th time of delivery. require that the person sssss CAUTION **** making the delivery make note of the loss or damage on th freight bill. or aSU his signature under the c0n- s19ner'3 m mo of th loss or damage. Contact the carrier EgUIPMENT DAMAGE- The PSS20OW must be mounted on f r Balm procedures, a solid concrete pad to prevent air from exiting under the unit.Allowing air to exit under the unit may caus the Vhen k6s or damage is noted after delivery.segregate the unit to overheat from lack of proper airflow.. damaged material. and contact the carrier f r claim Procedures. 60706-111 Page 3 22060 07/26/1995 14:09 C&R AIR CQND.& HEATING 2032236060 P.01 VA AD A 1.0ditlonr Heath • 00061 FAX 3"830 P/ TOOIV, r . dr ATrAW- 9 FROM Tam 71 • i0o le/-.w r KK %Nor 17 Extended Page .. •,♦ ••. Yw:i.M.rwr�l•.rv:AAs�•M....f.+ri.:•.t-.•.•:..•'.i•r.%rtw?rw:n.���i'�'J!• STE- & STAMPED FA4Y•�~'ir M 777. +� AMIPIUM Lim& Al V � tl w.97 a� 0>c7 ,0511 .10r1 ,et 1410 rr n ..1 3 I. 5i0 i0 1111r i a90 1670 nten N -15 to Vol-two 30i NO lfy f 9eS 1 i 80 i 671 . n. 1 33 '052 . 130 1P5 x 4• T mw qty. r 9 11 13 IS 22 VN. 1 430 4100 75D too IN 1500 *0►r x 6n ;+ T.P.(In.W.q.1 012 pc 1 .034 .042 .065 19b 158 *12►r x 4" 30 Thm611(fo ; ! 10 {b _ "cD 24 ._._ 10" x 51 r S1 WL V� - sae 480 600 720 690 -- -- 1200 1440 Tip. P• "! .DIS b2'r 035 .052 004 13U A80 *14 rr X 4" 6' - ' ..- 7 9 - 11 is 10 22 _26 411 514 91? -8231 We 1234 1440 _ 1214 x 5" !a38Zeklm- _. .__ _o,3 ,02t .030 0�4 _-oeo - 10 150 rP� r rr QH � 3.._- _ _ -) 9 {1 _14 16 21 _Vp _..28 1 0 V 310 4I4 568 7{8 •941 1137 1326515 4-3-a .019 ,044 073 .104 .140 ,e0 8" X 8" 40 � 4._, 10 14 11 7s 24 28 VOL 440 510 720 900 1060 1260 1440 n. -q .015 Ott 0 zo Oe2 .110 .14P 160 `1 r X 'I 46 Throw(114 8 10 13 i820P3 26 29 Vi1. 1 M - 409 oeo 6io ego O10 11to 12ea 14 . _. _:Un.W`,••,) 01 T 0 045 OGG �0" .112 .142 .110 101, x 811, .62 Throw tfla - _ __9 t 2 1 "-�6 i; -- .. ._.. �} 28 31 Vol. 1 aa;1 565 706 -847 000 1129 1270 1412 01.4 026 .039 AEG .076 .100 .122 tab r30 *14" x O►rr 66 Throw(fLI - 9 12 ,!� _ 10 _ 21 ._24 9i :'U 35 Vol.11111MI --393 574 655 lee 9t& loo 1178 1309 1571 16"x 6" 84 _.031 .044 010 era boa .116 '170 n• _ ,otu 1Zs x 8rr4 Throw L�• -- -- .. _ 11 �14 1r• _19 ?? ?5 78 33 VN. ( 4r;4 5e1 697 913 029 1045 1161 1393 n• - 0{4 TVP 041 .054 .069 .084 118 1G0 .203 x 75 Threw(}I.) 16 20 9� 7,, 30 35 43e4 480 706 854 960 1152 1344 1y36 - • � W Ga 016 .0" .031 D40 .051 .06P MOP '120 .150 125 16 X all �' Thfsw(f1.► _ 1! 14 +8 19 41 73 Ze 73 37 42 Vol,(I 1n) 414 - 497 SJR t,G7 745 B28 993 1159 r:1ia 1490 Note 'Available In A1bV slue, f W link assembly Any Lima muitivalve or opposed blade damper(steel or aluminum) can be ordered with an attached fusible link,assembly. I his is recommended for installation requiring that registers automatically close to roduce drafts in case of fire. The link is available with melting point of 2121'F When the link melts, it roleases a spring that forces tho damper to a fully cy closed position. The attachment does riot interface with damper Operation. Where larder size grilles require multiple valves, additional link assemblies wiil also be attached. Contact factor if cxtrornel y y srrr-1 ,�izes appear impractical to attach link asscrribly. NC)lty Fusibi,ink in mwS inbly i5 UI approved. a I F STEEL & STMWED I FACE AMMIINUM rml S IOV & Al V T.P.(In.W.G.) 027 059 .108 168 240 6 rr X 4 rr 13 Th row(ft.) _-_ s _ 9 ;2 15 —_16 -- --- -- — —_-- - Vol.(fpm) 550 830 1110 1390 1670 T.P.(In.W.G.) 014 031 054 088 120 215 {7 *p rr X 4 n 18 _Throw(ft.) -- ----5 -----8 __10 13 15 _20 -- —-- ---- — -- - ---- --- - ---- -- Vol.(fpm) 393 590 787 983 1180 1574 — - —-- -- — - — - -- ---- T.P.(in.W.G.) 018 033 052 075 .130 195 *10" X 4" 24 Throw(ft.) —_ +7 _ 9 ---11 13 _18 22 Vol.(fpm) 450 600 750 900 1200 1500 *8" x 6" 29 T.P.(in.W.G.) 012 021 034 049 085 125 158 - *12" X 4" 30 Throw(ft.) 6 8 10 12 16 20 24 10" x 5" 31 Vol.(fpm) 360 480 600 720 960 1200 1440 T.P.(In.W.G.) 015 025 035 062 094 .130 .180 *14" x 4" 35 Throw(ft.) 7 -_9 11 15 19 22 26 --- Vol.(fpm) 411 514 611 1 823 1 1028 1234 1440 12" x 5" 38 T.P.(In.W.G.) 013 021 030 052 080 110 .150 195 —_ *10" x 6" 38 Throw(ft.)_ - _-7 9 11 14 18 21 25 28 Vol.(fpm) 379 474 568 758 947 1137 1326 1516 T.P.(In.W.G.) 07 019 027 048 073 104 140 180 8" X 8" 40 Throw(ft.)-_ 7 9 10 14 17 21 24 28 — Vol.(fPM) 360 450 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440 T.P.(in.W.G.) 015 021 038 058 082 110 142 180 *12" X 6" 46 Throw(ft.) 8 10 13 16 20 23 26 29 Vol.(fpm) 400 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 T.P.(in.W.G.) 017 .030 045 066 088 112 1 142 170 _ 10" X 8" 52 Throw(ft.) 9 12 15 18 21 25 28 31 Vol.(fpm) 423 565 706 847 988 1129 1270 1412 T.P.(In.W.G.) _ 015 026 039 056 076 100 122 150 230 *14" X 6" 55 Throw(ft_) 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 29 35 Vol.(fpm) 393 524 655 786 916 1047 1178 1309 1571 IL�y e 16" X 6rr 64 T.P.(In.W.G.) _ — 020 031 044 059 078 098 116 170 v 12" X 8" 64 Throw(ft.) 11 14 17 19 22 25 28 33 Vol.(fpm) 464 581 697 813 929 1045 1161 1393 T.P.(In.W.G.) 014 021 031 .041 .054 069 084 _118 .160 203 14" X 8" 75 Throw(ft.) _ 10 _13 15 18 20 23 25 30 35 40 Vol.(fpm) 384 480 576 672 1 768 864 960 1152 1344 1536 T.P.(In.W.G.) 016 023 031 040 051 062 090 120 150 195 16ffX 8 87 Throw(ft.) 14 16 19 21 _23 28 33 _37 42 Ve1.(11 LIpm) 414 497 579 662 745 828 993 1159 1324 1490 Note: `Available in A10V also. fusible link assembly Any Lima multivalve or opposed blade damper (steel or aluminum) can be ordered with an attached fusible link assembly. This is recommended for installation requiring that registers automatically close to reduce drafts in case of fire. The link is available with melting point of 212OF. When the link melts, it releases a spring that forces the damper to a fully ° closed position. The attachment does not interface with damper operation. Where larger size grilles require multiple m ° ® o valves, additional link assemblies will also be attached. Contact factory if extremely small sizes appear a00 ° impractical to attach link assembly. Note Fusible link In assembly is UL approved 17 . .. r a _ i .. � , .� +++n�r,6'�•�R.m��x. . wv......-�-i'S'r:�t*.C.� FINAL INSPECTIONS: Building -.s" APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumb' HVA Date: Sprinkler 1742 MAIN STREET c� Electric Estimated Cost $ Zoning Permit Fee$ Zee Affidavit NO. 222 68 Occupancy Fee $ Eng. Dept. COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS. Fire Dept. TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Total Fee $ Health Dept. SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE. Approved for CO: (Additional Cost) $ TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT The undersigned, hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications: Job Location j Loto. ` Side of Street Zone Applicant a ,/ Tel. # r�>S Jy_S� Address IU y� �-� -Zip Lic.# T CITY STATE Owner Address— Architect Address Size New Area: Ft. Front Overall Ft.Deep Overall Total Area #Garages Lavatories Size of Lot Dist. from Street Line _Bathrooms Rooms 1 st 2nd 3rd Purpose of this Permit �c.S"� % lc<� UU&!1-C' City Water 0 Well 11 Septic 0 Sewer 0 Use Group /J 4 Construction Type Approved by � Date BD1A 11/88 I hereby agree to conform to all the requir ments of the Laws of the Stat of Connecticut and the Ordinanc s of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines,side yard lines and required distances from all other zones and is located in a zone in which this building and its use is allowed. " Signed— -Z I hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for permit. Signed —DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE— INSPECTION RECORD Footing Framing Foundation Fireplace/Chimney Insulation Plumbing Permit# Inspections: HVAC Permit# Inspections: Electrical Permit# Inspections: Sprinkler Permit# Inspections: Electric# APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Plumbing# 1742 MAIN STREET HVAC # Date: 2fid= Sprinkler# NO• 2 2 d 6 11 FINAL APPROVALS Estimated Cost $ D0U Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee $ qU Engineerin IF TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee $ Affida SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE Appr.for CO. Total Fee $ 90 TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,CT (Additional Cost) $ Th undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications: 7 U 06 Job Location JZAII� S� Lot No. Side of Street Zone Applicant hir"L f 1VI-4-.-h r�e-' Tel. # 6 4�¢rS-/4• Address A Zip Lic. # Owner h r Address a /(&2� Architect Address Sq. Ft. New Area: 1st Fl. 2nd Fl. 3rd Fl. Total New Area #Rooms #Lavatories #Bathrooms #Garages Purpose of this permit: City Water ❑ Well ❑ Septic System ❑ Sewer Use Group Construction Type N Area / Basement Garage Approved by Date '?LtaZF Revised 6/95 I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this permit is asked, and agree that this building is to be located the proper distance from all street lines, side yard lines and required distances from all other zones and is located in a z in hich th' bu/ildi rid its us s allo d. � po Signed `I ��VU 1 hereby apply for a Certificate of Occupancy for the work described in this application for the permit Signed -- DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -- INSPECTION COMMENTS