Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1735 Ellington Road (14)
TOWN OF SOUTH WIND SOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Application No. The Cession will official l receive applications Received D .a?-10y Pp at its .�eoular meeting on the 4th Tuesday of the Action or ubl ' Hearing y: 7 1 ��� rwnth, provided it has been submitted to the C Trrdssion Chairman, Secretary or agen Receipt N preceding day. , ' , „; j APPLICANT : s ADDRESS : S &ti a Ac 8r 6 6 0 Z/ OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: ` d Planning & Zoning Commissiod ADDRESS : 7,VV — , -S:h. WjnLe)r C.2L COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: &rkland and ZONE_ t?l , NAME , ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: &ore, TELEPHONE Ze/44 � THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING) 1. Zone Change* to (public hearing required) 2 . Filing for Subdivision 3. Filing for Open Space Subdivision (public hearing required) 4 . Filing for Resubdivision (public hearing required) 5 . Special Exception to Article (public hearing required) 6 . Site Plan of Development 7 . Removal of Sand, Gravel , Clay or Quarry Stone & Ore (public hearing required) 8 . Other (explain in detail) &IMQ jjam 1 LQ 0 oe tj�,�r- THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED WITH 6 SETS OF PLANS (7 sets if public hearing is required) BEFORE IT IS RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION. Applicant OWE R PLANING AND LOVING COMMISSION TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Fee Schedule and Policv I. An application processing fee of $25 per lot ($50 minimum) is required for: Subdivisions, resubdivisions, and open space subdivisions. 2. An application processing fee of $50 is required for: Change of Zone, Zoning Amendment, Special Exception, and Earth Removal or Land Filling Operations. 3. An application processing fee of $25 is required for Site Development Plans, except: where new buildings/additions/renovations of 2,000 s. f. or more are proposed, said fee shall be S50; said fee shall be $500 for Site Development Plans in the Designed Commercial Zone; $50 plus $5 per dwelling unit for Adult Housing ($500 minimum) . 4. An application processing fee of $10 per acre ($300 minimum) is required for a Change of Zone/General Plan of Development in the Designed Commercial Zone. 5. An application processing fee of $100 is required for a Change of Zone/ General Plan of Development in the Multi-Family or DA-15 Residential zones; or for a Special Exception/General Plan of Development for Adult Housing. 6 . An application processing fee of $50 plus $5 per dwelling unit is required for a Special Exception/Site Plan of Development in the Multi- Family or DA-15 Residential zones (S500.00 minimum). 7. Application processing fees are non-refundable after the application has been officially received by the Commission. Application processing fees may be returned prior to the application's official reception provided a letter of withdrawal, signed by the applicant, has been submitted to the Commission prior to the meeting at which said applica- tion is scheduled to be officially received. 8. Applications unaccompanied by the required application processing fee are incomplete, and as such may be returned to the applicant and removed from the Commission's agenda. 9. Complete applications and required fees shall be submitted at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Regular or Special Meeting at which it will be received. 10. Fees for a previously denied application shall not apply to any subsequent application. However, when a subdivision, resubdivision, or open space subdivision application has been denied within the preceding 12 months or approved for fewer lots than requested, and a new application for the subject tract is submitted by the same appli- cant, then the fee for the new application shall be a minimum of $50 plus $25 for each lot above and beyond the number of lots contained in the earlier application. 11. A fee of $5 per sign is required for signs to be posted by the applicant on the subject property. 12. Other Fees: Subdivision Regulations - $3.00; Zoning Regulations - $4.00; Zoning Map $1 .00; fees for other documents is as determined by the Commission. 13. All checks shall be made payable to "Town of South Windsor. " Adopted: 4/10;8y Revised: 12/4/84 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER ENTRANCE 1 . his ap ication is%for an addition entrance be pro v'ded to Town Shopping Center fr the west ide of Bu land ,/-he ad, just south of Society f r Savings, C zone. 2. When t e origi Town Sho ing Center ap 1-ication was submitted ' 1986, a applica had proposed o provide an entrance nto Buc and Road. At that time a Commiss' denied the ap ication ith a pri ry concern b 'ng that en ance and the i creased , raffic ent ring onto Buck and Road w ere the tra is is already backe up. A second application was filed ip '1987 showing only one entrance tad the Town Shopping Center,�6f f of Ellington,-Road which was appr ed. AFess at time the ST /permit which ha been granted would �nother allow construction/of a portion of a Center Y until a was obtain That provisi has bee satis ied due o the fact that cars can enter a exit th ugh the eery Office Park entranc . 3. An advantage to having this curb cut is that it would allow Society for Savings to connect, thus eliminating the curb cut closest to the 5-corners intersection. The disadvantage to this curb cut is the potential for same-direction conflicts- c citi•ng .i.th-- crating s nd cars slowing down to enter in front of, cars accelerating out of the intersection (T� If this application is to be approved, the planning department requests that the applicant provide assurance that Society for Savings intends to connect. The engineering department requests that is this application is approved that the engineering of the road work be subject to their approval. oWnCent2�r Ellington Road and Buckland Road at the Five Corners We the undersigned, Merchants at Town Center, have reviewed the plans for the driveway on Buckland Road and we feel it is very important for the promotion of our businesses to have motorists be able to enter Town Center directly from Buckland Road. -7 wh Q- Business Name S ature -bR, Business Nanhe 1 t r Business Name Signature All< or ,T�✓ t 1-4 111 MJSo VC, Business Name Sig �r CoLvod VAGIV Business Name nature S ,r / r ang S' t r Tm pregg on S Business Nafne Signature A , 56V?14 wayo sa 'Plu d Business Name Signa ure Business Name Si cXfa e Business Name lu r L Business Nam Signature 4y4ize—d-I Business N me Si at e / ?4 11,z -� Business 'Name 'gnature )IlDlb Business Name S re Business Name Signature Today's Concept for Business and Retail Developed,BuiltandLeasedby: 1744 Ellington Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074•(203)644-8761 •644-8140 Fax 644-5650 FZSK KELLEO INC TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - In connection with TOWN SHOPPING CENTER - ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT — PREPARED FOR: RSK- KELLCO COMPANY — PREPARED BY: STORCH ASSOCIATES 161 MAIN STREET WETHERSFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06109 March 3, 1987 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY in connection with Town Shopping Center Ellington Road South Windsor, Connecticut Prepared for: RSK-Kellco Company Prepared by: STORCH ASSOCIATES 161 Main Street Wethersfield, Connecticut March 3 , 1987 STORCH ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. AUTHORIZATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. SCOPE AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III. DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A. Site and Adjacent Roadway Descriptions. . . . 2 Drawing No. 1 - Area Location Map Drawing No. 2 - Site Location B. Roadway Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C. Wapping Five Corners. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 V. TRAFFIC GENERATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Drawing No. 3 - Site Plan VI. TRIP ASSIGNMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Drawing No. 4 - Distribution of Site Generated Traffic VI I. ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 VIII. RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS. . . . . 8 IX. SITE OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 X. CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 APPENDIX Traffic Volumes Accident Histories Volume Analysis Capacity Analysis STORCH ASSOCIATES I. AUTHORIZATION This study was commissioned by RSK-Kellco, Inc. on February 12 , 1987 and authorized by Mr. Richard Kelley. II. SCOPE AND PURPOSE The study was undertaken to review the potential traffic impacts which would result from the construction of a proposed Town Shopping Center on Ellington Road (Route 30) in the Town of South Windsor. This study is an update of the earlier work conducted by Storch Associates in connection with an initial application. Modifications in the original project concept have been proposed to address previously noted concerns. The present study program was designed to further analyze the project and present an implementation program which mitigates traffic concerns. III. DEFINITIONS In order to clarify the meaning of the certain specialized traffic engineering terms used in this Report, the following definitions are offered: Trip is a one-way movement to or from a site. One car entering and leaving a site constitutes two trips. Traffic Generation is the actual number of vehicle movements which may reasonably be expected to be attracted by a specific development. Usually, traffic generation is expressed as a number of trips. 1 STORCH ASSOCIATES Average Weekday Traffic is the total traffic generation of a development on a typical working weekday. Peak Hour Generation is the maximum traffic generation which may be anticipated during the highest volume hour for the particular development. This analysis parameter may vary as to the time of day, depending on the type of facility proposed. Office buildings normally generate peak volume rates which coincide with the peak volume rates of the surrounding roadway network, fast food restaurants have peak traffic during the Noon hour. Trip Distribution is the process of determining the proportion of the generated trips that can be expected to originate at any location. Traffic Assignment is the process of assigning the trips which have been distributed from the various points of origin to the roadway system which would provide the most direct route -- between the points of origin and destination. Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) are terms utilized to describe the ability of a roadway to handle its traffic assignment. -- IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Site and Adjacent Roadway Descriptions _ The Town Shopping Center is proposed to be located on 21.4 acres of land on the south side of Ellington Road (Route 30) west of the Wapping Five Corners intersection. The general location -- is shown in Drawing No. 1, Area Location Map and more specifically in Drawing No. 2 , Site Location. 2 i VAWd SION Now%Mtn one aF J ��1 �. �/■ i:.�r �. _►�•. I .Ira all 9�►� r TOWN SHOPPING CENTER SOUTH WINDSOR, CT AA AREA LOCATION MAP a. T, �.�_ J d I / 1� N I Q o<(• Q i �\ ��// S \c4p J S4N0 W w > 5«l a c � r1�t� 'EOgQ / BgEtt� A / W r oEERF?ELO rq\ `(��C ELUMGTON O 04kcgh0 3 'r i F ~ vP SITE LOCATION _ I C TOWN SHOPPING CENTER RWR OFFICE COMPLEX SOUTH W I N DSOR, CT xxs: SITE LOCATION N.T.S. p�Nwq my. F.Y.M. STORCN NAItCM fleT ASSOCIATES wRwas�a.0.CT osM9 2 STORCH ASSOCIATES The site is roughly the same location as in the previous application, but has been expanded by the acquisition of land to provide a contiguous parcel. It is proposed that the site be served by a single drive located on Ellington Road approximately 960 ft. west of Buckland Road. Although the site has a front, no access is proposed to this project from Buckland Road. This is the major conceptual change from the previous application. The site is generally level and at the elevation of the adjacent roadways, thus facilitating access drives. B. Roadway Conditions The site is bordered by two roadways, namely Ellington Road (Route 30) and Buckland Road. Ellington Road (Route 30) is a two-lane state highway varying from 30 to 40 ft in width. Its alignment in the project area is straight and level, and sight distances measured from the proposed drive were found to be adequate. The road is constructed of bituminous concrete and is marked as two lanes with a double centerline pavement marking pattern. Buckland Road is a two-lane town road which measures approximately 30 to 36 ft in width and is constructed of -- bituminous concrete. As noted previously, no direct access to this street is proposed. C. Wapping Five Corners The Wapping Five Corners ' intersection is located in the immediate vicinity of the Town Shopping Center. This — intersection, with its multi-phased traffic signal, is the major 3 STORCH ASSOCIATES traffic capacity constraint in the area of the Town Shopping Center. The intersection is the junction of three state highways (Route 30 , 194 and 74 ) . In addition, Buckland Road extends from the intersection to Manchester and I-84. Adjacent development to the site of the Town Shopping Center is primarily commercial with Society for Savings, SNET, Colonial Cornere, and the Town Hall located in the vicinity. V. TRAFFIC GENERATION The Town Shopping Center will consist of a mixture of office and retail uses. The task of estimating traffic generation, therefore, is a function of developing projected traffic flows for each use category and then making a composite flow estimate. The use categories comprising the Town Shopping Center were: o Shopping Center 50,000 - 99 ,000 sq. ft. o General Office under 100 ,000 sq. ft. -- o Bank with Drive-in Present plans call for the shopping center to occupy approximately 65,000 sq. ft. with approximately 55,000 sq. ft. of general office and a 2,500 sq. f t. bank as shown in Drawing No. 3, Site Plan. The methodology used to project traffic flows was based on traffic generation factors published in the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1985 Edition) . Table I presents the results of this generation. 4 . sG z �y M F O D cp .............. .............. a � RT E 30 1 ROAD ELLMGTON a� 1 c 0 r z 1 1 , O 1 DETEN7 .� �% 13ASIN 1 1 1 1 1 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 1 SCALE: SITE PLAN N/A DRAWN BY: F.M.W. CHECKED BY: STORCH 161 MAIN STREETDATE:J.W.F. FEB ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES WETHERSFIELD,CT 0610' DWG. N.1 3 STORCH ASSOCIATES TABLE I Projected Trip Generation Town Shopping Center Trips Enter Exit Land Use Time Period No. % No. % Total Retail Daily 2665 2665 5330 65 , 000 sq. ft. AM Peak Hour 91 52% 85 48% 176 PM Peak Hour 208 49% 221 51% 429 Office Daily 487 488 975 55 ,000 sq. ft. AM Peak Hour 80 85% 14 14. 9% 94 PM Peak Hour 11 15% 63 85% 74 Drive-In Daily 240 240 480 Bank AM Peak Hour 8 89% 1 11% 9 PM Peak Hour 35 48% 38 52% 73 Composite Daily 6785 Site AM Peak Hour 179 64% 100 36% 279 PM Peak Hour 254 44% 322 56% 576 VI. TRIP ASSIGNMENT The size of the proposed town Shopping Center is in the classification of Community type retail center. The size of the retail center is such that it will not serve as a regional magnet, but will fungtion primarily serving the needs of local clientele. The center will attract passing tra�fic also and it is estimated that at least 20% of peak hour trips to this site will be traffic which is passing the site for another trip purpose. Such Trips are called "capture trips" since they would pass the site in any case. The 20% level is conservative in that some studies by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) have seen peak hour capture rates as high as 75%. 5 STORCH ASSOCIATES For the office component of the site, trips would be assumed to be "new" trips and would be added directly to existing volumes. Trip assignments were made for the morning and evening peak hour periods. As both of these analysis periods represent journey-to-work, it was assumed that directional distribution of the Town Shopping Center traffic would follow the existing pattern. Thus, the "new" Town Shopping Center traffic was assigned to the highways on the basis of existing traffic flows. This distribution is shown on Drawing No. 4 , Distributioon of Site Generated Traffic. VII. ANALYSIS Once the level of projected traffic flows have been determined and thus, traffic assigned to the roadways, an analysis of projected impact was possible. To perform this part of the study traffic volume data obtained in April and May of 1986 was used and updated. This data was combined with the projected Town Shopping Center traffic and future volumes projected. These figures were then analyzed for traffic operational levels. Observations of existing traffic flows were performed and the accident histories for area roads obtained. The critical traffic period was determined to be the evening peak hour. This period of homeward bound type vehicles exhibits the highest traffic flows. 6 II i SAND _ °I° R040 0 / °I° �/ Q Q� �( L•fw % N °\° W�/ h ev �{ SCGi� C4•f �l II - eaEE2•� � /'/ V r ofERFIELD Z �° 71% 9 of� 1A1 � a Elt_N+3'7M ROAD U. / 04 k +h k, / pp a O .,P O 1 y �y 1 \�\ ° M��Fcaa - 51 �� \\ O I fIAO w 0 Y/ , 06 r Zo,/- O C °Oc ,T"/ 1 ° TOWN SHOPPING CENTER o ! SOUTH'WI N DSOR, CT \ acxi: ` DISTRIBUTION N.Ts. (V) OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC p111MM By: F.M.W. \ V 1 VRCH NI MAIN/ vrwu 46. MARCH rMT ASSOCIATES •1T 1!!mma,C7 osall ps, 00.4 STORCH ASSOCIATES Existing traffic flows show marked congestion at the Wapping Five Corners intersection and long traffic queues are seen in Buckland Road and Ellington Road (Route 30 ) . We are aware that the Town and State have identified the Wapping Five Corners intersection as requiring major improvement: and are currently developing a project to this end. The concept being evaluated includes the widening of Buckland Road to four lanes and the relocation of Route 74 to intersection Sullivan Avenue west of the Post Office. The present Wapping Five Corners _ intersection would be markedly simplified. Our analysis confirms the need for these changes. It is, however, recognized that this project would not be in place when the Town Shopping Center is opened. Thus, we reviewed methods available to mitigate the traffic concerns surrounding the Town Shopping Center. Since the driveway to Buckland Road has been eliminated, traffic operational impacts have been concentrated to the single site access on Ellington Road. Problem areas which arose included: 1. Turning traffic obstructing through traffic 2. Insufficient gaps to enter traffic stream from driveway 3. Extensive queueing from the Wapping Five Corner intersection past the site drive. Specific traffic engineering measures have been developed to address these concerns. offsite traffic improvements will be required and a specific program has been recommended. 7 STORCH ASSOCIATES VIII. RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS Analysis of the area roadways and proposed site driveway revealed the need for certain traffic control measures to ensure adequate traffic operations are maintained. It should be noted that the changes in the Wapping Five Corners intersection are essential if overall congestion and delay are to be corrected. The improvement program identified herein is designed to allow acceptable traffic operations to be maintained until that project is completed. The recommended program is as follows and is shown on Drawing No. 5, Traffic Control Plan, enclosed in the attached pocket. 1. Widen Ellington Road (Route 30) in the vicinity of the Town Shopping Center drive to provide a westbound left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane. 2. Install actuated signals to control the drive and assume safe entry to Route 30. 3. Interconnect the driveway signal with the Wapping Five Corner signal to assume maintenance of proper signal coordination. _ 4. Implement timing changes and equipment modifications at the Wapping Five Corners intersection to provide for access management operations during the evening peak. IX. SITE OPERATIONS Our review of the site layout did not reveal areas which would not function as intended. We have examined the proposed parking to be provided and it is well within the number of spaces 8 STORCH ASSOCIATES which would be required to support this use. Parking accommodation data sheets are included in the Appendix for office and retail uses. In general, we would estimate a demand of: _ 1. One space for each 330 sq. f t. of office space 2. One space for each 200 sq. ft. of retail space X. CONCLUSION On the basis of the analyses conducted and assuming the improvements recommended are in pace at the time the Town Shopping Center is opened, it is the opinion of Storch Associates that traffic impacts related to the Town Shopping Center will not materially adversely affect area roadways. Identified concerns will be mitigated to an acceptable level _ by the noted improvement program. Resolution of overall congestion will be realized upon implementation of the currently planned Town/State plans for the _ Wapping Five Corners intersection. .._ 9 _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ yn� nu � � �� � nm ��~ � °~ .~ - _ __ _ _ ^ ' _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ MAC::INE COUNT SUMMARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: _BUCKLAND ROAD Town: SOUTH WINDSOR Tape # 300 FT. SOUTH OF RTE.194 74&30 INTERS Date: 3-(27126)-86 W 33 _ Counter # Direction: _ NORTH BOUND Project 7 -- MOND AY T U F S D AY WEDNES= TrURSDAY FRID AY SAT UR DAY S UNDAY DATE Aid 83 _2 AM �3 %Z- 3 AM y 3-4 AM 9 4-5 AM �� • S-6 AM. 3y _ 6-7 AM q7 7-8 AM 18.3 8-9 AM �y 9—10 AM •;. _ 0_1I AM 2,$6 2,q7 - _ I1'-12 AM 12- 1• PM v� I - 2 PM 2-3 PM yid 3-4 PM 4 -5 PM - 7/0 5-6 PM 6-7 PM -- 7-6 PM 387 8 -9 Pm 88 9 -10 PM 10-11. PM if=12 PM HIGH NS - Z4 HR.TaT ' J WmMENTO ~ MACHINE COUNT SU?WARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: BUCKLAND ROAD Town: SOUTH WINDSOR :'ape # 00 FT. SOUTH OF RTE.194 74&30 INTERS Dale: _f^7_ 50 _ ' W ?L4 Counter I Direction: SOUTH BOUND Project i : MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 7URDAY SUNDAY DATE 7-S6 12- 1 . AM 013 }_2 AM3y 37 3� 2- 3 AM 3-4 AM 4-S AM 6-7 AM 7-6 AM 3 D y 13.3 g-9 AM .332 ;Z 3 7/ 9 -10 AM 'y37 3y3 33.E /63 10—I 1 AM I1'-I2 AM .?7Z 12- 1' PM 330 1 - 2 PM 77y yaS y2�- 66 yy� 2-3 PM 36� 3 9y , l 97 3-4 PM 33� 3s,3 . 2r8 _ 4 -5 PMJ 32o 277 . -- 5-6 PM y70 3-7/ 6-7 PM �123 36� . 337 3z7 ;7-9g 3,2 ;yi e -9 PM 20 /V / 90 17.o� 9 -10 PM- TD-11. PM - 92 2 ° l 83 s1—i2 PM 7y 8 10.3 VG HIGH NS 24 HFLTC;TA4 COMMENT: MACS .INE COUNT SUMMIARY STORCH ENCq4l0&,NEERS f�uCkr14tit � Tape # Location: _J �- � �.. �, �p�c, ► off'. -���, � ? S�=p< Date: _ Counter Direction: _ 57, 3,1WJZ> Project 1 : MONDAY TUFSDAY T-H R CAY FRIDAY SATURDAYISUNDAY IATZ -- IZ- 1 . Apt t y -2 AM ll - 2- 3 AM - 3-4 AM S 4-S AM II - S-6 Am 6-7 AM y32 7-8 AM 6-S AM ��3 9-1D AM •" tD-II AM -lz AM 22- !' PM I ` I - 2PM1 2-3 Pm _ 4 3 PM - - 5-6 PMl � I .6 -7 PM - 7-8 PM 8 -9 pm - - - -9 -I O PM -' 31-i 2 PM ,�• f f HIGH R z�Wi-7 TOWIN pib 1ul •., �f /1 I,�`.i I I 'j)AI � _ ,c�rrr► r.1 Li -_�-==--- ATE. 0 � ' EATHER-5UAIN/V ROAD SURFACE U,S • 0 LENGTH eY + LOCATION- Q Lt C k L AhlT COMPUTED pY R. F H 19y �0 7y CHECKED 6Y S MOVEMENT N0. 15 MOVEMENT NO. 15 MOVEMENT N0. 15 MOVEMENT N0. M N LIME PERIOD MIN. MIN. 2 3 MIN. 4 5 6 Tt7TAL T 8 9 TOT-AL 10 I I 12 A i TOTAL 6 AM - 6:1 5 6115 — 600, �T 6130 - 6>4 5 6:4 5 - 7:00 �'6d �6 36 HOURLY TOTAL ' 7:00 - 7:15 Ti 15 -- 7 30 /75 101 2�G r30 - 7:45 l7S 9y 7T 4 5 — 8100 —3 S)- 2�15 HOURLY TOTAL 6 7� 362 1039 eloo - 8:15 I P 6 22� 8:15 - 8:30 1 3 1 8;30 — 8:4 5 a 4 5 - 9:00 HOURLY TOTAL 9 00 — 9:1 5 ' 9:15 — 930 9:30 — 945 - 9:4 5 — 10.00 . HOURLY TOTAL 1000 - 10, 15 ID 15 - 10:30 ------- 103 0 - 1045 10:4 5 - 11 00 HOURLY TOTAL WOO - 11115 _-_----- 11tI5 - 11:30 11:30 - 11:45PD 11:4 5 -121H_0011 . HOURLY'- ; -A L ...._.� , MACHINE COUNT SUMMARY STORCH ENGINEERS E ._ FLL � C,77O" Gn Lr-ation: Town: C; , Tape � , -f�U V/ I A U-!7-Y LA Date: ]_- - 6 W 3 L -- ection: _ fin/. R rJV N 'J Project # : y6 y7-vri ( Counter # 0 . MOddDAY TUESDAY THL RSDAY FR1DAY TURDAY SUNDRY DATE �5--7,S6i 12- 1 . AM IS 2 AM 1 � 2- 3 AM Q 3-4 AM Q-S AM 16 S-6 ABM 7� 6-7 AM 410 7-8 AM 93q 8-9 AM 637 - 9—10 AM 0-11 AM T-12 AM 2,73 12- 1' pM 3 2 1 - 2PM 31y 2-3 Pm - 3-4 PM - 4 -3 PM - 5-6 PM -- 6 -7 PM .3DJ 7-8 PM 273 - e -9 PM 9 -IOPM ( 2Q 10-11. PM - U - 11-12 PM AV . HIGH R 4 HP.-TOT WMEKT: MACHINE COUNT SuMb"ARY STORCH ENGINEERS Location: _ E LLING-QN lit/(/l/r)SQQ Tape # • �T• fzu2etifAll^ Date: w _ 3� _ Counter # ^Direction: RO AND _ Project 1 : 7-ao 1 -1 -- MDNDAY TUFSDA7 WEDN=CW T MSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY DATE AM �9 - f -z AM 2 2- 3 AM 0 3•-4 AM 6 : 6-7 AM I 7-B AM 6_9 AM 3 00 9 -10 AM - 0-11 AM 2 it--IZ AM � Z2Fs - i2- �• PM 336 I - J _ 2PN4 2-3 PM �6 1 _ 3-4 PM 4 -5 PM I $47 5-6 P M Sb� 6-7 Plati ' 472 - 7— s PM 11 3 9 -10-PM I S 1 gay I ?O—11. PM 11-12 PM V • R f — H lGH Z 4 HP._TC;TA I 1 C.Di,tltr?ZT: - - TI •1 1 i ♦ ► i - 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 • • • man no= ®errs �r� mmmm • mmm mmmm • mm mmmmmm wmr�mmm r■����■r • ��r� ��■rr�� mmm� mmmmmmm • ���r�r r��� mmmm •, wr�s �ar�� mmmm • �s�n� rr�� mmmm 1 �- ---� ---- -��- .1 mmm� • ���� i■�s� mmm� mmm� mmmm • �rA� �s�sr�w mmm •• �r�w �r��r mmm� mmm .• ® r - ©t�mi� worm"cam Amy • a r�c� : r_ c�m� min . c� • ®m® rmor m Cl I mm= goc �on�� M�:�m� 1 1-- Cn1— 00 1 1 AT_ x� - wE DA' 'I1� � ) 1 (OWN S� t�,th5C1R r Cr P j(7 1�d�� Q- A0A0 SUnrACE DMRY y i Al�1E A �1,l�IIY - --1' LENGIN 6Y I IL � LOCATION TA�� Rff�-� �F '�I - ��cw�rav � P�,tEo BY R F N - 7 y, 4v. - aN n`____- fib. CHECK E 0 BY —. - - ,- MOVEMENT NO. 15 MOVEMENT NO. 15 MOVEMENT NO. 15 IME PERIODS MOVEMENT NO. 15 M V M 11+ MIN. 13 14 15 ( MIN. 16 �7 18 � OTA 19 20 f 01A1 DIAL TOTAL :1 12:15 ' 12.15 - 1230. 12.30 - 1245 12-45 - 100 I oU1�LY T OTC I:00 - 1:15 1:3 0 - 1:4 5 I: 4 5 - 2:00 IOURLY TOTAL 2:00 -- 2115 2:15 -- 2:30 230 - 2:45 _2:4 5 - 3:00 HOURLY TOTAL 3:0 - 3' S 3:15 - 330_ 3:30 - 345 3:4 5 - 4-00 ftoVall NTA—L 77 kq 1-7 4 4:15 7 z.7 -31 d- 26 45 77 11 15 82 1vg Hd 11 FT69 - 6 4:I5 - 4W 430 �- 4A 5 � Z4 68 5 2� 3 I 16 7 Z� �9 3 z I 154�45 5Q0 110URLY TOT Z5 /all IYq Z7 331 5 00 -- :15 _,� 7 F � 18 836 - 5�032 3 7 2. zo gq A5 �q 34 ci5 3 zy :61Z � y0 5 y 6 �y 2 Z�_ 75 � �-1 25:4 5 - @00 76 Z3 HOURLY TOTAL I 15 33d I G11ANb TOTA • TES 309194 AND 74 AT BUCKLAND ROAD COLLISIO=DIAGRAM . ROUTES �N • JUL.1,1982—JUN,30,1985. SOUTH WINDSOR ti 40 or Q - OA KLA 11tp RpA D s ��4��c6' 1;4 7;�47� 8Y Y7'2� Z. ,3yp.•, •;1,�,,, -�83�:ti4a.r, Zli�, �;$-3P,,, P"'� �7 1 r�sP4 3 1-12 ��Zq� �2-iY134 p,., o r 2�a,-►.� Ls ��.3- RTE. 3 0 .o��„� 3. :z ; b:�DEHTS 3T T*f m-,AL I o`•1 o I o 0. IPERxTI 6 L4 1 C? z I 3q I t 2 III a - -- -n1•�L � � yl 16 I �6 _ � LEGEND MOVING VEHICLE --♦� LEFT TURN COLLISION -----► SIDE SWIPE PEDESTRIAN � ® PARKED VEHICLE �'�� OUT OF CONTROL ---�*' REAR END COLLISION WITH PARKING OR UNPARKED VEHICLE BACKING -VEHICLE p FIXED OBJECT --�+--� -R E-A R END --COLL IS10 N FATAL ACCIDENT — — fl PERSONAL iKJ_URY HEAD ON COLLISION 1510N . . sTOno* EwozwEcns 2/25/1987 - TOWN SHOPPING CENTER C4715A zwTsnssoTzow � noUTE 30 @ -AOUTE 30 @ szTE DnIusw�� WE[KD�Y AM 1991 CDD?N ^_SEMI-wCTuwTEo szmmwL - M�uon sTnssT nuws FAST / wssT ...............-....................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................ TnAFFIC & AOADWAY CONDITInwS - onAns nu nJ m1\c I...w . ousss oowr . Pcos Tow *nn wnP (Ik Y/w wm /wu ) P*r ( neus/1.)r ) T/m ssc TYo� ........� .................... ........... .................................... ................ �............ ..........................._� ...................................... ................ _- EB n � m o o 0 .90 0 w V . o 3 WB O 5 w 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0 . 0 3 NE. V o w n n 0 . 90 n w w . m o ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o: EOnETAIC, S / ooLUMES - LAmE mnOUPS VOI...UMs 1. 2 3 �PP L.T T* nT mwm I...ms Wo rion I...ws IAJo Mwn I...ms WD ............ ................................................................ ............................................--........- ............................................................. ............................................................... _ sB O e59 op T 1 A.e . m n J. :1.e . 0 uB 1.-el 0 898, 0 L :1. 12. 0 T 1 12 . 0 NB 78 V 22 L 1 12 . 0 n 1 :1.2 . 0 _ ............-............................-........-------................--........-....-....-........-............................-........--..................................................................................................... ---- - SICNwL PHA SING' APn PHASE 1ST MV 2ND Mu 3AD MV PAOT PMSV C YfA --- ----- ------ ....-............- ------ ---- ---- -- --- _ EB 1 T R A 40 50 WB A. T I.' '10 o0 �xB 3 L T L 24 66 wB e 1 F/ I.'n 20 70 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2/25/1987 sTono* cmoIwEsnS INTEASE�TIOm C�7z5w _ m � — W -+- [ | S ~ — nouTs ao E/W 5Tn[s'1 _ -........-....................................................-....................................................-............-............................................................................-........................ «............ � _ �--- � v \/ . ........... > _ 1 ---� v _ ............................................................... ....................-............................................ � { > � — AOUTE 30 | | | | / ) | | | / | / � P59 | � ' } 898 � — -----x <....-........- EB TOTAL ua ToTPIL 290 o9 1q0 1U38 — ....-........-. SITE DRIVEWAY . ----- v w/S STnEET v . _ 78 22 � . . � — ma TO TA L 100 _ _ _- . -- PA[;E J. sTOno* EmCINEEAS 2/25/19B7 - TOWN s*onPzwo CA715A INrEQSECTzr]N � nouTE ,an m - AOUTE 30 @ szTs nnIuEwwT WEEK0wY AM M 1.991 CaD ? m _ SEMI-ACTUwTED szoNw� - nAJoA STnsET nuws swsT / wcsT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------' oo ... unE ^^ nJusTncwT _ APPnoACH �wwE CnoUp r�ow RATE L.Ams uTz� �ou F�ou P�oP oF Tunws num vo�ur1E zm onouP V f.)oToP, nwTc T nT _ ................................ ___ ______ ................................ ______ ____ _............ ...._........ EB T 259 288 1 . 0O 288 0 . 00 0 . 00 o . mo J. . ou _ WB L 140 156 1 . 00 156 1 . 00 O . 00 T 898 998 1. . 00 �9- 8 V . nn o . 00 78 87 1. . n0 E37 mo n 22 2'1 n . 00 1. . o0 _ -----....................................................-........-....-...........................----....-....................--....-....................-............------------...........-....-........................... SwTUAwTION FLOW ' _ zosAL 41- or ............--........--....-........ FACTORS- ....................--............--- wou. wPP MVM SAT FLOW LwNEs wIDTH * . V . ��mwDE PwAK BUS �Rsw^ AT LT F1...OW --- --- -------- .................... ....-............ ---- .................... ............- ---- ---- ....-........ ---- ---- -- EB T 1800 J. 1 . 00 0 .9B J. . 0o 1 . 0D J. . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . O0 176^m A 1800 J. 1 . UO 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . ()0 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 85 1 . Om z-el 99 VI Ell L 1800 1 1 . 00 O .98 1 . 00 1 . 0o 1 . Do J. . 0D 1 . 00 0 . s'5 1676 T zamO J. :1. . om 0 . 98 :1. . om J. . om I . Vm :1. . oo :1. . oo :1. nu 176'v NB L z80n 1 z 0 . 98 1 . o0 1. . 00 1. . oU 1 . 00 :1. . 00 0 . 85 1 lei 99 -- A zC)no J. J. . nn 0 . 98 J. . no J. . 815 1 . ou j.^v9q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Pv^CE e sTono* EwCIwE[ns 2/25/198� - TOWN C4715A zwTEAsEoTzow � nouTs on fif? - AOUTE 30 @ SzTc DnIoc��Y WEEKDAY wn pEAK 7-oAn x99z CnD r w !:*)EMI----wCTUATED SICw�... - MwuOn sTAsET AUNS EwST / wEST _ �������������������������������������������������������������������������������_. - oAPAoI 'r � wwALy � zs �m cw AD'..) r�Ow PnsV oDu swT r...oW csm L.w V/� _ APP MVn AATE LT FLOW F�w AT QATIO CAIT ? AwTIO Cf)-PPiCITY nATIO ............ ............ ................ ........-....-........ ........................ .................... ........................ ................... -............-............ ----- I:::Ell T 2ee n x76-el u . :1.ao m 7e/v 0 . o67 A ^u3 0 zq99 0 . 029 N 666 o u65 _ WB L 151 � 1676 0 . 090 N 38 T 'v`pca 0 z76-'1 0 . 566 y /x o . 79. 6 _ wa � 07 0 :1. 99 o . u5e Y 1.31: 3 0 . 26z n ew n :1.4,29 o . 01.161' w o . a2a a3o o . 072 _ Cl YCLs I-EwmT* 'pn . m sUn oF wEs~ �...ou nwTzos u . aew LOSS TIME PEA CYCLE 6 INTEASECTION V/C � 0 . 669 _ - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SEAVICE - LN GA V/C CnEEN CYo 1st LN ['A 2 n d L'N CA LN onR wPP *^PP f�PP nVn AATzo nATzo LEm DELwY CAP DB-AT PF DEL T LoS DEL�� LOS --- --- -................ ----- --- .................... --- ----- -- ----- ............ ----- --- _ EB T 0 .367 n . ��� 90 :1.e . 6 :1.2 .7 B ' A O . 065 0 . 4/*I4 90 10 . 9 666 0 . 0 1 . o0 10 . 9 B 12. 4 B WB L O .338 m . 2a7 � 90 20 . 2 ��7 0 . 2 1 OU 2O .z; C - T 0 . 796 O 90 6 . 6 :1.e5w 2 . 6 :1. . 00 9.2 B 10 . 7 B w 1 0 . 26:1. 0 . 2ee 90 2e . 0 ooa 0 . :1. 1. . nn 22 . :1. o _ A 0 . 072 o . 222 90 21 . 0 333 0 . 0 1 . 0o 2:1. . 0 C 21 . 7 o zmTEPssCTzow oB-AY ll. . e secs/ve� _ LEVEL Or SEAvICE B _ _ _ _ _ sTono* cw�zwssns 2/25/1987 - TOWN S*oPPzwm CENTsR o471.5P INTEASECTIOw � noUTs 30 (h) - AOUTE 30 @ SITE onzuEMwY WEEKDwY pn PEAK Was PM 1.191?1. canrm sspoI-wCTU�TED szc:NA� _ - nwuon sTnscT nuws EAST / WcsT .............................................................................................................................................. ------...................................................................................................................-....................... TAmF, FI (� m nowowwY oowozTznws - CnONos *v wUu . Pno L.N . BUSES CONF PcoY, ['EU :n mPP (% ) ( t ) Y/m wm (m1:-� ) P*F ( p^`us/}`r ) Y/m sF:r TYPF:. --- .................... ............ ....................-............ ................ .............. ....................................... ...................................... -- ' -_ sB o o w o o n . 9V n w no a WB u 5 N o 0 0 . 90 0 m 0n o NB o 5 m 0 0 0 . 90 o w n . 0 3 _ ----------............ .....................................................---....................................----------------......................................................--................................ CEomsTnIoS , vo � ur1sS - LANws mnooPs uoLu ill E 1. z 3 APP LT T* nT nom I.'mS wD non L.ws wo Mon L.w5 WD --- ................................................................ ................................................................ ........................-........-........................ ............................-................................ _ EB o 9�5 1.8o T 1. 1.e . o n 1. 1.2 . 0 WB 74 367 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 1 z2 . 0 ma 93 o ee9 � J. �2 . 0 A 1. z2 . 0 _ ....-.................................................................................................-............------------------------------------------------- - SICNAL PHASImC A P P P*AsE 1.ST Mo 2wD MV 31:',,o Mu PAOT PnSu [n Yfn .................... ______ ______ ______ ____ ____ __ _ EB J. T n n 45 45 EB 3 T n Q 15 75 we 1 L T L 45 /15 mB 2 � A eq 6 6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' _ . ' sTOnc* EwozwEsnS 2/25/1987 INTEASECTION CA17151:` _ N � — W -f- E } S _ _ noUTs po E/W sTnEE� _ .............................-........................................................................................................................................................................................................' ` <............ � _ �--- 1 v . ---» _ 1 ---w' v _ ----------------- -....................-....................-................ {* *> � � — ADUTE 30 \ } | | | | \ � | � 915 � a67 _---- _ -----» � WB ToTAL Eo TOTAL :1.090 :1.e0 DAIVEWAY . ----- v w,s sTnssT v . s'3 229 | / | | — we TOTA L 322 _ ' _ , PACE J. sTono* swGzwEcus 5/198�r - TOWN C4715P INTEASs om � nouTs �n m - ADUTE 30 @ SITE DAIVEw�Y WEE�ox�T pn o....6 pn 1912- :1. _ SEMI- .. - MAJOA STnEET AUws EAST / WEST ----------------------------------------------------------------------'--------- VOLu � c AoJusTncwT _ ApPA011�-,C* ow L.Aws uTzL. oj r}.ow px/(/p or T�/Pws mom vo�uMF zw pAo7ou n(-)Ts |�T _ ................................ _........ ........................ ________ ........................ ................ ............... ____ Ea T 1.017 :L Vm 101r n . no o . 00 Q oo 1. ow _ WB L 74 C. J. 82 z . no o . 00 T ouT /108 1 . n0 /ona 00 om - NB L 1 00 103 1 00 n 229 a5(1 25-(1 0 . 00 z . 0O _ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- SATUAATION FLOW - IDEwL w OF, ..................... -................--ADuUSTnENT FACTOns---'----------- Aou . APP MuM SAT � mES wzDT* H . u . Cl.nwnE PnnK BUS AnEw AT L'T FL ow --- --- ............--....-- -............- ............-- ....-........ ........-........ ................ ................ ---- ............- ................ ....-........ -- EB T :1.800 1. 1. . V0 m . 98 1. . 00 :1. . 00 :1. . nV 1. . nO :I. . n0 1. . 00 176,(1 A 18n0 1 J. 00 u . 9B 1 . o0 :I. . o0 1 . om :1. . 00 0 . 85 z . Oo :1.q�9 _- WB L 1800 1 1 . 00 0 .98 1 . O0 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 1'11 24r7 T 1800 J. . 98 :1. . 00 :L no :1. . 00 :1. . 00 l nm 1 00 1764 Na L. 1800 1 1 . V0 o .98 1. J. . 85 - 1499 - A :1. . 00 0 . 9e :1. . Vn 1 . 00 :1. . 00 1. . 00 n . B :1. . 00 1.4p9 _ _ _ _ _ -- ' ' 2/25/1PQ7 .`w^Cc 2 sTonc* �mozmEcn� — TOWN SHOPPINC CENTER CA [NTEnSECTIom � AouTE oV 0) -POUTE 30 @ �zTc nnzocwmY ^ocsKoAY 9x C,ao '/ w _SEMI-wCTUwTED Slow�vL - mAJOn sTnEET AUNS EAST / wsST ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... --- - CAP � CI7Y wNm | F�UW Pm!:�o ow �n[cn _App nvM AATE L.T pLoW F�w A7 nATIO CnIT ? nP11IO CAPw(�zTY n�rIO --- ............ ................ ............................ ........................ ........-........ ------ ................... ............................... ............-- Ee T 1017 n :1.r6w n 577 Y 0 . 667 11 0 . 865 k 200 0 1w99 0 . zo3 w 0 . 667 pp� 0 .200 _ WB L c/� 0 247 0 332 y 0 . 11-500 123 0 . 667 T �oo n �7�w o . eo1 w o �on �ae 0 .wa3 _ wo � 103 o :1./112 9 n . oup n u i�."u7 -el om o . 12or n 25zl n 1499 O l69 Y 0 267 /lo0 O635 —oYC�E 90 . 0 sUn OF CAITIC/oL LANES' F�OW nwTIoS 1 . 07o �'Dss TznE Psn CYoLE � a zwTs PS)sCTzDw u/o 15 _........................................................................ -............_....--_--------_---_---_------------_---------- ........................................... LEVEL OF SEAVICE — �w on u/o mnssw oYc 1sn �w GP 2nu LN oR LN CA wnP /�Pp wPP nuM AATIO nwTIO LEm AY Cwp DELAY osLmY I...os osLw`r �os --- --- ----- ----- --- ................- ............ ----- -- ........-........ ............ -........-.... --- se T o .e��:� 0 . 667 �o � V x �76 � . 9 � . 00 �o . 9 e -- n 0 . 200 0 . CS6T 90 4 . /1 999 0 . 0 :1. . 00 el el A :1.2 .3 a WB � L 0 . 667 0 .500 90 :1.2 . 8 � 8 . 6 :1. . 00 22:1. .w c — T o . 'vao O . oVo ��o �� . � oa2 0 . 3 � . 00 11 . w a 13 . 0 B NB L o .257 0 . 267 90 :1.9 .7 -el n0 0 . :1. 1 . 00 19 a C _ A O . 635 0 . 267 90 22 . 1 -el Oo 2 . 3 1 . O0 24 . -el C e3 . 0 o ImTEASECTION DELAY — �EuEL O� SEnvICE � B _ _ _ _ # # STORCH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM # Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # _ Tise Period...AM PEAK 7-8 AM # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 t # # # FINAL COMBINED VOLUMES # # \� N\A # 0 # v ;i # „ # #„ # 0 ------ 0 # 140 # 11004 # �f AT. 30 # X # RT. 30 ;; # 289 # ----) 307 -46t- ------) 78 0 22 _ # # „ # 100 # # v ;; # # 179 ; - ;; ; 100 # ' # SITE DRIVE # # # ~ # STORCH ASSOCIATES # f INTERSECTION # * TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # Tise Period...AM PEAK 7-8 AM # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 X CURRENT BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES # # # # # # # N\A # # * v „ # # „ # 0 t 0 # # # 0 0 0 ►! (------ 839 839 t---- # 0 # 839 (---- (-- v --} v # AT. 30 # -- AT. 30 # 242 0 ------` # 0 # " # # " # # „ # # 0 # # # „ „ 5IT� �"IVE T ######################################################################################################################### # STORCH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # TURNING MOUEMENT DIAGRAM # # Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # Tine Period...AN PEAK 7-8 AM # rondition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 # # # # FUTURE YEAR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC # # # # \; N\A # 0 # 0 a # 0 0 0 ;! (------ 926 926 (---- # 0 # 926 (---- (-- v --> ;; v # AT. 30 # # AT. 30 267 # ----) 267 267 ------> ;; 0 0 0 # # 0 ; 0 # 0 # v # SFTE kTVc R���i?in R•��w.�:+f•�.�S�Rt q+1.�i.4����TT��,.q.��il•��Tndh-F}���1��.X*1�r��Ihw.)��ih�%*.�!t At�*it�����.T•ti A:�.�i.d..FT!�'.������y;S�A.T.i.��R?�Y�.n R��A}fi•'.'l,�Ym�.i.�, STOP.CH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM # # Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # # Tine Period...AM PEAK 7-8 AM # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 $ # SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES # # # # # # \� N\A # # # # ! \ 0 0 „ # 0 0 # „ x 0 0 0 1.1 (------ 0 140 (---- # # 0 140 # # 78 (---- (-- v --> v # # AT. 30 # _ # AT. 30 # 22 # # # ----} 39 0 ------} ;; 78 0 22 # # 39 1 „ 100 # -- # v # , # # 179 100 # v , „ „ # „ „ EiTE DRIVE r y a- fi�xl.+y.S1�l�y�^���R•�•�T`�nF.���d����I,..T P,T�A f A���InT�f`T�ll�����.1��wy���.I.�l�l��X.f.���R•T��`�^}����.��$#Ar Ih�����R� Y f.�v��^�{•���r-�Y.•T#x�tr..�.x Lt.�.�l _ sTOACw EwCIwsEAs e/1.9/:1.987 _ Towm s*OPPINC CENTEA lwTEA5EoTIOm � �OUTE 3m @ ; )UTE 0 m c-TE DAIwE WEEmDA`r ^vn PEwm 7....e wn 199z o�o7w 1—IsICNAl...%ZED ' MAJOA STnEET AUNS EAST / ussT ....-........-....-................-....-............................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... .................................. _ TAAFFzC & ROADWA � CONDzTIoN5 mnwDc *v Ao� . PKo L.N . m.jsss cowF ncos pso auTTow nnn Y/w m w� n I`r > Y/N Ssc T\P[ --- .................... --- --............-........... ................ ---- ................------ ............................ ......... ................ _ Ea 0 5 w m n m . pm o w o . o o wB o 5 N o n 0 . 90 O N 3 NB m 5 N 0 O 0 . 90 m w wm 3 ~ ............._..........................................................................................._............ _________________________________________ _ msonsTnzCS / vo � UMES LANE, [;AOUPS oOLuME 1 a 3 APP LT TH QT hvM. �ws wD mVn �ms ub non �wS wD _ ............ ................................................................ ................................................................ ........................---------- .............................................................. EB 0 267 39 Tw z ze . V We 1-elm 926 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 1 12. 0 ' — wB 78 o e2 L 1. :1.2 . 0 1: 3.e. 0 _ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . 19 98.7 STOAcm sw('Vzmssns — IMTEASECTION CA715A N ( -- W ....f.... E | S _ _ nouTc yo E,W STREET _ .......................................................................................... ....-........---....-....-.................................................... '............-................--....-- �--- z _ w'--- 1 ^^/ 1 --*> v ' _ -----_--_------_- ----------------- / xw' `*> | -- EVw 5TAsET | \ | � | | _ 267 | | | 926 -----» {----- EB TOTAL WE., TOTAL 306 39 1^n0 1066 _ -----. sIT onzuE . ----- v N/S 5TAEE7 v ' — 7e 22 { . . > wB TOTwL :1.Vn ' _ _ _ _ . ' ' STDmo* ENcnINsEns 2/1.9/1.987 _ Toww G*oPPzmG osrNTEA o^n715w lNTEASECTION � nouTs om m _ �OUTE 3O @ :iITE onzvs WEEKoAT AM PEAK 7....e An 1.1291. Cao?m ~-4..VN5I[;NALIZED - MAJOA STREET AUNS EAST / WEST ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ Um z w ("i L. zZEn onITzC., wL. (.,I APs — .... ............. ------CQITICAL CAPS ( SEC)---------- APP LErT TuAw THnouG.* AI[;*T TUnm --- ....----................ ------- ........... ------- _ WB 5 . 00 --- ....-.... _ NB. 6 . '50 --- 5 . 15o _ ---------------------------------------------------------------....-............................. ---- _ VOLUME ALLOC' ATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T A L T A L T A _ --- -------------- -------------- -------------- sg m e67 om 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- WB 140 0 0 U 926 0 0 U � wB 78 m 0 O 0 22 0 0 ' ~...._.......--_-_ ......................................................-----------__--.......................................................... --------------------_-_- UwSIcaNALIZED — wPP LAmE :1. LA.NE P. LwwE 3 ___ --_---- -_----- _------ . — E8 AESEAVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LsusL OF Ssnoz�E _ We QESsnvs Cl'wp/vCzTY 733 --- --- LEVEL OF SEAVICE A wa QESEnuE CwPwCITY 29 Tr5 --- — LEVEL OF SEAVICE E A nOIJon STRsET - sa/Wa _ _ # # STORCH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 9 Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. — # Time Period...PM PEAK 5-6 PM # # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 # * # # # # FINAL COMBINED VOLUMES # # # * * # # r r $ # r ! \� N\A # T 1\ 11 • _ * rr 0 0 # # ri ii i ri v ri r ri ri $ ii rr rr r r 9 0 0 0 Si <------ —882— 456 <---- # # i 0' ------ # f 74 # 475 (---- (-- v --) I'0 v # to RT. 30 # # -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- # --------------------------------------------ii}------------------------------------------ * RT. 30 — I'll # 1,179 r1 rr r r # ----> 11131 __Rw ------> Ili 93 0 229 # if 160 ;; 322 # rr # if # -- $ 1 ri — _ r r # 254 322 rr r rr # # rr rr # # SITE DRIVE * # ######################################################################################################################### # # # STORCH AS50CIATES # # INTERSECTION # # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM # Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # Tiae Period...PM PEAK 5-6 PM # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 # # # # # # CURRENT BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES # # # # \� N\A # \ 0 0 # v # # # 0 ------ 0 # # 0 0 0 (------ 346 346 (---- # # 346 (---- (-- v --> v # RT. 30 # RT. 30 �� # # <-- --) ----) 861 # # ----) 861 861 ------) 0 0 0 # # 0 0 # # v !� # # 0 0 # # v �! # SITE DRIVE # # # STORCH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM # # Project.......TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # * Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. * Time Period...PM PEAK 5-6 PM * Condi.ion.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 * * — * FUTURE YEAR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC # # # * # * * \; N\A # 1 \ 0 f 0 # # # * 0 ------ 0 # * 0 0 0 ;; (------ 382 382 (---- # 0 # # 382 (---- (-- v --> v # * AT. 30 * AT. 30 951 0 ----- 0� # * „ # — * ----) 951 951 ------> 1.1 0 0 0 # „ # 0 0 # * # „ # v „ * # , * * , # SITE DRIVE # _ � yyy y y.} y {.y �r yy. {y yyy y spy y{. +,r J yyyy l yp yyyyyy�r y yyjr y+,i M y y ,r L y} q y1�ryty.�e 4..�.X.��I0.�q.R A��.�•�q•4•�3,•��Y R.R.�F�XR.f•!t*!k 4�AR.R.�X,.RAT X.N-T I.AA!fi•M*!,�4t iF 1R}l.��nAA�.�4 4++�¢4+R4i�R A�.P fi.4ir.�T f F/;.�,�'.4.�T I..F44?�t.��T��f�F��b-�.I�Ar.F/.4T T•i•T # # # STORCH ASSOCIATES # # INTERSECTION # # TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM # # Project..... ..TOWN SHOPPING CENTER # # Location......SOUTH WINDSOR CT. # _ # Time Period. PM PEAK 5-6 PM # # Condition.....DESIGN YEAR 1991 # # # — # SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES # # # # # # \; N\A # # # # r \ 0 ;; 0 0 sc 0 # It 15 # 0 0 0 (------ 0 74 (---- # # 0 74 # 93 (---- (-- v --) v # # ;; RT. 30 # # RT. 30 # 229 ------' — # ----> 180 0 ------> ;� 93 0 229 # 180 322 # v all # # 254 322 # v ii i # " # # " # " # # SITE OPIVE ' STOQCH ENGINEERS 2/19/3.987 _ TOWN SHOPPING, CENTEA CA1715P IwTsAssCTzow � _ nOUTE 30 @ AOUTE 30 @ SITE DQIoE WEEmDAY PM PEAK 5-6 Pn 3.991 Cao?N - umSzGwwLIZED - MAJOR STREET FAUNS EAST / wsST ............................................................................-----................-------------------------------------------------- - TnAFrIC u noAoWAY COwDITIOwS CQADE HV ADJ PKC LN . BUSES CONF . PEDS PED BUTTON AAA mpP (%) (%> y/m mu. (mu ) P*F ( p(--,u�/�r ) Y/w sco TTPs --- ----- ............ --------- ................ ---- ........................................ ................-....--........ ................ _ EB 0 5 N O m 0 . 90 o w m . m 3 wa m N m m � . 9. n m m 0 . o a NB n 5 N 0 n 0 . 90 n w n0 o _ ........-....-.................-.....................................--------............ --------------------------------------------------- _ G, EOMETAICS / u () LUMES LANE GROUPS uoLuns 1 �.? a APP LT TH AT mun L.NS WD MuM L.NS WD MVn LNS WD _ --- ---------------- ........-............................-........-........ ....................................................-........ ---------------- Ee n s/�:1. 1.sm Tm z :1.2 . 0 WB 7-11 3B2 0 L 1 l2 . 0 T 1 12. O - wB 93 0 229 L 1 :1.2 . 0 n J. :1.2 . 0 _ _ ' _ _ _ _ ~ _ -- . '2 19?19e7 SToAC* EwGImsEA5 _ Ii4TEASECTION CA715P N | W -f- E | 5 ^ _ _ noUTE ao s/w sTnssT _ --------------------------------------------------- .................... ----- <--- 1 _ *--- J. v v _ --------_---_-_-_ _-------_-_--_--- | <* »k> | — ROUTE 30 | | \ | E/W 5TAEET | | � � | | _ 951 ---__y <-.... _-- EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 113� 180 7-el 456 — ----- . SITE mAIoE . ----- v N/S STQEET v ' — 90 229 < . . � | | | � — wB TOT�� 322 ' _ _ _ --. . 5TOACH EN GlNEEAS 2/1.9/1987 _ TOWN SHOPPING CEMTEA CA715P INTEA5ECTION � nouTs on UP 30 @ szTE mnIVE WEEKDAy PM PEAK 5-6 PM :1.99:1. cDD?t4 —uNSI[oNALIZED - MAJOP STREET AUNs swsT / WEST ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ uNSICm ^^ LzZcD cnzTzowL. nwr` s — ...........................................(:-nITICAL coAPS ( sEXII)------------- APp LEFT TuAN THAOUCH nI��HT TuAw --- ....-............................ -----_- ---------- _ EB --- --- --- _ wB 5 . 00 --- ---' No 6 . nm _ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - VOLUME ALLOCxxTION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 ApP I... T w L T T n _ --- ....-....-....................----- ...-........ ---------- -------------- EB 0 951 18m 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- WB D 0 V 382 O 0 0 0 N8 93 0 0 m 0 229 0 0 0 ............---------------------------------------............ ------------'--------------------- _ UNSI [: NALIZED — wPP LwmE 1. LANE. 2 LANE 3 — EB AESEnVE CAPACITY --- --- --- �'EVEL oF ssAoICE _ wB mESsnvs C�Pw�zT`/ ��6o --- --- LEVEL OF SEAVICE C ' NB AESEAVE CAPACITY -15 74 --- — �EVEL OF sEAoICE FwILuAE E MwJOA STREET _ _ SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Shopping Center, 50,000-99,999 G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code 821 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Gross Square Feet Leasable Area -- Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak A.M. Enter 1.4 1.7 1.1 2 80.0 Hour Between Exit 1.3 1.6 1.0 2 80.0 of 7 and 9 Total _ Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit 3.4 5.5 1.7 11 79.7 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 7.8 '13.3 3.1 19 75.6 Peak A.M. Enter 3.0 3.8 1.5 3 80.0 Hour Exit 2.9 3.6 1.6 3 80.0 Of Total 7.5 13.2 3.1 ~= Generator P.M. Enter 3.9 5.6 2.4 6 81.1 Exit Total 9.3 15.4 4.1 19 74.0 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter 5.1 _ 7.3 4.0 - 6 79.2 Hour of Exit 5.3 7.9 .3.4 8 76.0 - Generator Total 11.1 18.3 60.9 12 75.8 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 49.3 100.9 21.5 6 78.5 Peak -- Enter 3.9 4.1 3.8 2 80.0 - Hour of Exit 3.5 4.1 3.1 2 80.0 Generator Total 6.5 8.2 4.7 3 82.0 Source Numbers 3, 4, 69 14, 199 59, 64, 72, 759, 78, 98, 1101, 124 - -- ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, 1979, Rev. 1982 - r�"" - G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Q2neral Office Under 100,000 G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code 7.11 Independent Variable—Trips per _1,0. nn rrnss SailarP FPPt of Rui 1 dj ng Ares — Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Av rage Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak A.M. Enter 1.45 1. 0 1. 28 24 . Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total -- Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total Peak A.M. - Enter Hour Exit - of Total Generator P.M. Enter - -- - - - Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak _ Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter. -- Hour of Exit Generator Total 4 Source Numbers 5, 21; 540 72 , 882 890 920 981, 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1 9 8 2 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Drive-in Bank ITE Land Use Code 912 Independent Variable—Trips per 1,000 Gross Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Averag Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 192 220. 0 160 4 4 . 8 Peak A.M. Enter 3. 0 Hour Between Exit 0, of 7 and 9 Total 5. 4 7 . 1 Adjacent P.M. Enter 14 . 0 55 . o 4 . Street Between Exit 15 . 1 55. 0 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 2 Peak A.M. Enter 1 . Hour Exit 1 _ • of Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 8. 12. 8 5. 0 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of -- - - Exit - - Generator Total Source Numbers 89 , 90, 92 , 98, 104 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1979, Rev. 1982 4�-.- Caution, limited sample size, use carefully. PC "' Planning & Zoning Commission He explained to the Commission that retail space drive in banks mean different things to traffic office space, and en look at the different uses when determiningtrafficgineers and need to pg. 5 gives a summary of trips and gives figuresfor peakgeneration. Table 1, generation. Table 5 breaks this down for AM and Peak hour traffic PM peak hours. Analysis of the area roadways and proposed site d the need for certain traffic control measures to ensure rivewasure revealed traffic operations are maintained. adequate It should be noted that the changes in the Wappi section are essential if overall congestion and dg Five Corners inter- corrected. The improvement program identified herein is to gbe n allow acceptable traffic operations to be maint � is to to is completed. ained until that project The recommended program is as follow s and is shown Traffic Control Plan, enclosed in the attached poc on Drawing No. 5, pocket. 1. Widen Ellington Road (Route 30) in the vicinity Town Shopping Center drive to provide a westbouof the turn lane and eastbound right turn lane. d left 2. Install actuated signals to control the d safe entry to Route 30. rive and assume 3. Interconnect the driveway signal with signal to assume maintenance of properthe signal coordination. si ppingFive Corner g 4.. Implement timing changes and e "'at -- equipment modifications at the I Wapping Five Corners intersection t p provide for access management operations during the evening peak. Mr. Ford went* on to say that proposed g s provided is well within the number of spaces which would be required to support this use. � Attorney Kerensky interjected that the minimum a is 980, and actual proposed 565, therefore they rking spaces required Of spaces. y are asking for a reduction Mr. Richard Kelley, the applicant, commented that this site denote the center of town and it will he would like to see ' a focal oint have the green area as point. He stated that the structures will be primaril i with very little wood, and some aluminum sidin y brick type buildings with large windows. The structure They would be colonial j areas surrounding it. s will tie in both the Ms. Banach, the Director of Planning, � - - t g, had the following comments_; The applicant proposes a total of 112,500 s ft ----office space in six separate buildings, q sq. sg4' ft. for space in one building.p g and 65,000 sq. ft. retail ►71 L11 C1L1VC1 Ati- l/ll 1 i Planning & Zoning Commission - 7 - 3/10/87 This plan appears to meet all zoning requirements regarding lot i coverage, setbacks, building height, etc. Lot coverage with build- ings is 13.6%, 25% allowed. (There is no impervious surface coverage limitation in this zone) Maximum building height is 401 ; 45' allowed. A substantial waiver of parking spaces is requested. This appears to be borne out by the Urban Land Institute's "Shopping Center Devel- opment Handbook. " There is a small amount of regulated wetlands on the site, adjacent to Ellington Road. The IWA/CC has approved the plan with conditions that 1) right to drain be acquired from the Land Trust, and 2) locations of temporary sediment basins be shown. There are several existing buildings along Ellington Road which will be removed. I understand that all intervening lot lines for this property are being dissolved and the entire site will be under common ownership. The landscaping plan looks quite aggessive and attractive - in excess of 150 trees of respectable size, and several hundred shrubs. There is quite a variety of trees and shrubs - flowering evergreen and leafy - maples, oaks, dogwood, honey locust, blue spruce, london plane. There are one or two stretches of parking areas which are somewhat unbroken, but it appears' that from Ellington Road and Buckland Road the unbroken areas are screened with landscaping. The area to the south of the site with single family residences off Deming Street is also screened with white pines. The gazebo area is planned to be set off in a park-like manner with a continuous line of burning bush shrubs and grass lawn, with planting beds around the 'gazebo- itself. There is certainly not an overabundance of dumpsters. Where provided, they are screened with stockade fences and plantings such that none should be visible externally. The architecture is overall quite attractive, with some good use of brick and block. Roof lines are varied and aesthetically pleasing. All buildings will blend quite well together and should blend in nicely' with the existing surrounding office buildings. I would hope to see extensive use of brick on the fronts of buildings. Sign control is also planned so all signs are attractive. Internal traffic flow has been designed to accommodate interconnections both to Terry Office Park to the west of this site. The Waldron property to the west is currently in the site planning stage, and the Terry Office Park may have future--plenz -for-new buildings so all the site plans can reflect the interconnections to each other. Tonights site does contain one access road which does not travel through, parking areas and which serves both interconnections. With all three commercial sites developing simultaneously, there is no reason for patrons to have to exit back onto Ellington or Buckland Roads to patronize any of the other commercial facilities. I would strongly recommend that PZC ensures that the interconnections are in fact provided. I do want to hear from the Fire Marshal & Police Chief regarding this plan. 1 a Ij ; Planning & Zoning Commission - 8 - 3/10/87 Pedestrian access throughout this site has been provided. To the maximum feasible extent, buildings are accessible via pedestrian paths from the other buildings on the site. There are sidewalks provided on both Buckland Road and Ellington Road frontages. The walks are concrete along the road frontages, and are bituminous in- j ternally. Widths vary, and at a work session the Commission may wish to look at the different widths to be sure they are adequate. Also, the sidewalk stub out to Ellington Road should be eliminated. Once again, traffic will be the major issue for this site. The Buckland Road access has been eliminated, and the Ellington Road access is about 900 ' away from Five Corners. This project will add to peak hours flow but will attempt to make that newly generated traffic manageable through the improvements suggested. There is a strong potential for an eventual outlet onto Buckland Road via Terry Office Park as well as an outlet onto Clark Street via the Waldron property for safety and emergency vehicle access. The Five Corners improvement project is certainly in limbo right now - the best case scenario right now is that it will get constructed but two years behind schedule -- the worst case scenario is that it won't get constructed with State and Federal funding. There is a tough issue to be faced here - knowing that no matter what this Commission does to act responsibly regarding traffic flow at this intersection and whether we like it or not we have massive development planned for just south of our border to the tune of about two million square feet, which will certainly add to our problems at this intersection without providing any benefits to this town. The project before us tonight will add -vehicles to this intersection but is attempting to mitigate the problem as much as possible -- and will also provide benefits to this town. This project will require STC approval. STC has the final word on traffic improvement. On balance, the plans are overall quite reasonable and the site should be aesthetically pleasing if approved. The Town does need the retail facilities. If approved, there should be some kind of phasing to ensure that the site is not wide open all at once. If approved, the following plan modifidations are needed: (1) Parking formula should also reflect the Town's requirement for each use. (2) Show water lines. !t . Planning & Zoning Commission - 9 - 3/10/87 Mr. Martel , the Town Engineer, reported: The applicant will have to go to WPCA & plans should be ' modified so as much sanitary as possible be directed toward Buckland Road. Drainage computations have not been completely reviewed. Pavement section along where major traffic corridors, base, thickness, etc. Water needs to be shown and approval by fire marshal for hydrants, etc. Parcel abutting Buckland Road needs to show complete topography out to Buckland Road. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or opposition to this application. No public comments were received. The Commissioners then asked questions. Mr. Conde was concerned with the parking reduction, but Mr. Ford from Storch Associates said in com- paring the size of this site with other similar sized sited that these are adequate estimates. Mr. Kerensky commented that additional parking could be added if needed. Mr. Conde asked about the five-corners with development going on outside the town. Mr. Ford addressed his questions by stating that they tried tc accommodate for development occuring outside of the town and feel adequat traffic operations can be maintained. Mrs. Rossi had questions about one-way traffic and any specific stip- ulations for trucks entering and exiting. Betsy Kaemmerlen said the intent is to encourage them to use the loop road. Mrs. Rossi wanted to go on record saying she is very much in favor of the idea of the developers working together to interconnect roadways in areas where there are currently dead ends. Mrs. Klenke asked if the project would be phased and Mr. Kelley said tha,_ the roads and utilities would be put in first, and the buildings would be phased based upon demand. Mrs. Klenke. also asked about any restauran- coming in -- Mr. Kelley said that no fast foods would be put in, however most likely some restaurant would go in, Mr. Hallowell wanted to be assured that the final A-2 survey would show the property under one ownership-.--., Mr. Kerensky said that Mr. Kelley would own all of the lots and Mr. OlNeill commented that it could be shown on the single tract. Mr. Hallowell addressed the possibility of Mr. Kelley placing a con- servation easement on the center green area and Mr. Kerensky stated that the applicant would probably not object. of Ellington Road, between Clark Planning & Zoning Commission -10- . 3/10/87 111so, Mr. Hallowell addressed the proposed road corner and the drop off present. Betsy Kaemmer in the southeast this road connection onto the Samsel r len assurred him that however it will need a considerable amountrOf would gbe . possible, questioned a left hand turn lane on Buckland grading. Mr. Hallowell What affect the proposed development on theRoad and 'also questioned five-corners intersection. Mr. Hart asked about the proposed improvements to Ellington Road. Mr. Ford responded that the widening would 1 beg ' Way of Society for Savings and would continue-' across from the drive- beyond the driveway cut of the south until 450-500 feet would take place on both sides Ofotheeroadvelopment. He stated widening Mrs. Evans commented on the overhead wires they should not appear on the final plans. shown on Page Sd2, and said about the internal circulation of cars throughout Evans was also concerned Ms. Betsy Kaemmerlen said the internal 'circu ghout the development. it would have a 30 foot road in front of t'circulation was designed so that cars and/or trucks sto he retail business so that pping would not inhibit traffic flow. Mrs. Evans final question was to ask wh lewd out to Ellington Road Y there was no sidewalk which would said this could be added, however s from Community Road) . Bets people crossing Ellington Road, it in order to minimize the n Y numKaebers ofrlen been left off. umbers of 1Zth no more comments to be made, the Public c hearing was closed. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P.M. AIS-ROVED: Respectfully submitted, _ _ Michele Rowley, Assistant Planner 6 J 9 STANDARD APPROVAL MODIFICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN (rev. 2/7/89) /� PROJECT I '' APPL. NO. O 1 _ , � '�; �.. ENGINEER/ARCHITECT �� ,�, =-� PROD. NO. DATE i q 1--1 REV. DATE ash a DWG. NO. 8� SUBMIT MYLARS OF SHEETS . . • 1 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff . 2. No building permits will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's Office. 3 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $ • 4 . An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a C rtificate of Occupancy per Section 4 . 13 . 10 of the Zoning Regulations . 5. Footing drains are required if the building has a basement_ required and 6 . A landscape bond in the amount of $ is re q must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 7 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets # 9 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland W tlands Ag ncy/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the office of the Town Clerk within 90 days . After filing t th se plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted t g Department. Q►� Svbi c c-� dt,�ar IS o (Do-c� WO-7 -(''ItiP I D W►n �� r �PE r G 9� a STORCH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS-ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 161 MAIN STREET WETHERSFIELD.CONNECTICUT 06109 (203)529-7727 June 15, 1987 Mr. Richard S. Kelley President RSK-Kellco Company, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Subject: Certificate Application Town Shopping Center Ellington Road South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mr. Kelley: This letter will bring you up to date on the status of the review of the Town Shopping Center by the State Traffic Commission (STC) . On May 13 , 1987, Storch Associates filed with State Traffic Commission Application for certification pursuant to Section 14-311. On May 29, 1987, correspondence was returned to us transmitting comments of the planning division, specifically Mr. John Curtis, concerning trip distribution assignments. We would note that the comments involved, not the numbers of vehicles to be generated by the Town Shopping Center, but rather differences in opinion as to the methodology used with respect to assigning these trips to the roadway network. On June 1, 1987, we met with Mr. Curtis and resolved the concerns and are currently preparing additional information with respect to this application as requested by Mr. Curtis. In summary, the State has requested that we use a less weighted approach to distributing traffic to the roadway system. This will result in a more balanced assignment of trips to roadway network. This, we believe, will not materially affect the results of our analyses presented in the report prepared for the Planning & Zoning Commission. In fact, the analysis which is being utilized at this point results in a less critical volume condition for the Five Corners Intersection, in that the volumes are not as heavily weighted on a per approach basis. FLORHAM PARK WESTBURY BOSTON MANCHESTER PROVIDENCE NEW JERSEY NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS NEW HAMPSHIRE RHODE ISLAND STORCH ASSOCIATES Mr. Richard S. Kelley Page Two June 15, 1987 We have also received indications from the Department of Transportation that the specific concerns of the Town of South Windsor raised with respect to the Buckland Mall impact on the Five Corners Intersection will be considered during the review of the Town Shopping Center. We trust that you understand that the traffic certificate review is an ongoing process, one which is very detailed and inquiries will be received from time to time from the Department of Transportation as specific areas are reviewed. We are pleased to have been able to resolve, so quickly, the initial comments from the Bureau of Planning and will, of course, keep you advised of the progress of this application. V y truly yours, ST RCH ASSOCIATE f" i James W. Ford, P.E. Associate JWF:mt Wecr 4715 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL fro PLANNING DEPARTMENT s TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 4��osoR.co���` 1540 SULLIVAN AVE. SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 203 644-2511 Date / cA � - .O TO: %All,� RECEIVED 11 MAY ? 1 1990 ® 1� ^ f"South lrldsgr WE ARE SENDING YOU: W P&Z initial plans Q Drainage comps EM P&Z final plans = Bond estimate requests O Inland Wetlands plans 0 Bond reduction requests M Final plans for filing 0 Change order form C] Other O Correspondence Copies App. No. Project THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 10 For review and comment O For your file M For your use 0 Returned with revisions M As requested [ZI Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: COMMENTS: ,.Jed 0, 2- r r L� i Copy t r PLANNING D$PARTl�'P IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Jean Zurbrigen, Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Thomas Hart, Fire Marshall Lanning, Jim Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# 0 - y/70 Zone ecC Acreage Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial Location: Project Description:t Q�lit _Ir AL,_t V"Ik, �-%/�ol'� At Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No ✓, (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by 61,1,6 if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. pZC r Tia 01 � m v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 4�~4soa-co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 18, 1990 Mr. Richard S. Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelly: Re: Application #90-41P, Town Shopping Center Entrance Site Plan We are pleased to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 17, to approve the above-referenced application for a site plan of development in accordance with drawing No. 2, dated May 1987 and last revised February 4, 1988 prepared by Storch Associates with the following modifications: 1 . Prior to .commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff . 2 . An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 4 . 13 . 10 of the Zoning Regulations . 3 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 4 . The engineering details of the roadway are subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 5 . It is strongly suggested that an island be added to Society for Savings driveway, between the entrance and exit portions of the driveway. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet #2 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within Mr. Richard Kelley July 19, 1990 Page Two 90 days . After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION C- �. U Lou se C. Evans Chairman cc: M. Banach, Planning Director J. Collins, Chief Building Official J. Iazzetta, Town Engineer F. Shaw, Supt. of Pollution Control E. Belleville, Assessor W. Lanning, Fire Marshal Registrar of Voters Contact Person KAHAN, KERENSKY, CAPOSSELA, LEVINE 8 BRESLAU ATTORNEYS AT LAW 45 HARTFORD TURNPIKE Box K VERNON. CONNECTICUT 06068 SOLOMON KERENSKY MAUREEN A. CHMIELECKI JOSEPH P. CAPOSSELA TELEPHONE (203) 646-1974 EDWARD C. TAIMAN. JR. JEROME D. LEVINE TELECOPIER (203)647-8302 BRUCE P. FADER WILLIAM E. BRESLAU JAY A. GABRIEL* JOEL M. FAIN SUZANNE E. CARON MICHAEL A. BARS DEAN W. HUMMEL WILLIAM J. DAKIN MICHAEL J. KOPSICK** GARY W. HOHENTHAL OF COUNSEL COLLEEN M. McCARTHY ROBERT E KAHAN July 18 , 1990 ALSO MASSACHUSETTS BAR "ALSO NEW YORK BAR Ms. Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor jj�31�0 RECEIVED 1540 Sullivan Avenue den t h 1 South Windsor, CT 06074 JUL 19 1990 Re: Richard Kelley - Town Center SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Dear Marcia: Please send to my office a copy of the approval letter in connection with the above-captioned case. Thank you for your cooperation ' th his matter. Si c el 0 o Kerensky SK/sd f l0~M 8 e � �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JULY 21, 1990 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION At its July 17, 1990 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to take the following action: 1. Approve, with modifications, as a settlement of pending litigation of Jehovah's Witnesses vs. the Planning and Zoning Commission, Application #89-47P, for a Special Exception to Article 4 .1.8.b of the zoning regulations and site plan of development for property located on the north side of Burnham Street. 2. Approve, with modifications, Application #90-41P, Town Shopping -Center Entrance Site Plan, south side of Ellington Road, west side of Buckland Road, RC zone. 3. Deny, without prejudice, Application #90-07P, Bray Site Plan, Special Exception 4 . 7 .2.8, 489 Sullivan Avenue, I zone. 4 . Approve, with modifications, Application #90-47P, Town of South Windsor Community Center Site Plan, east side of Nevers Road, RR zone: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Louise C. Evans, Chairman Bernard Hart, Secretary UPADER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address In the"RETURN TO"Spec*on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this o•ro from being returned to you. $be Damn For additional Ion the following services are available.Consult postrnester for fen and check boxes for additional earvlce(s)requested. 1. O Show to whom delivered,data,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery t(Extra charre)t t 8xtro oharae t 3. Article Addesued to: 4. Article Number P 007 587 012 `,e Mr. Richard Kelley Type of service: Rk4ellco, Inc. ❑ Registered! ❑ insured 1744 Ellington Road ® Canifled COD ❑ Express Mall Sout11 Windsor, CT 06074 Alwaye obtain signature of addresses r. or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Signature—Addressee S. Addressee's Address MNL Y If X requested and fee paid) 6. u —Agent 5,,,, - (���, q1P go PS Farm 31811, Msx.1987 u8.400.Is-W-17on MV DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. • Complete items 1,2,3,and 4 on the reverse. U.S-MAIL Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. PENALTY FOR PRIVATE End rse article "Return Receipt USE,$300 Requested"adjacent to number. RETURN Print Sender's name,address,and ZIP Code in the space below. TO 'f '+'-- +i i r,_, LETTER OF TRANS-MlITAL 4 y r o � PLANNING DEPARTMENT = �� TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR kf�oson'cor'`a� 1540 SULLIVAN AVE. SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 Date (203) . 644-2511 714 M 7 Iwo 'k M Nr.- r WE ARE SENDING YOU: Q P&Z initial plans Q Drainage comps . P&Z final plans Q Bond estimate requests Q Inland Wetlands plans Q Bond reduction requests Q Final plans for filing Q Change order form Q Other Q Correspondence Copies App. No. Project J THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Q For review and comment Q For your file Q For your use Q Returned with revisions C-1 As requested Q Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: _ COMMENTS: L2 IV Copy to. It From: f Af 2.. Application of Richard S. Kelley, for a site plan of development for �b property located on the south side of Ellington Road, between Clark �p Street and Buckland Road, known as the Town Shopping Center, RC Zone . (Bob Conde sitting for Marshall Montana) Attorney Sol Kerensky, representing Richard Kelley, described the proposed site located off of Rt. 30 and Buckland Road in the south west corner. It would consist of a retail - commercial office park with approximately 65,000 sq. ft. being retail and 57 ,500 sq. ft. being office (of which 2,500 sq. ft. would be a banking institution. He stated the applicant . had appeared previously, July 1, 1986, with another proposal which was denied - and since that time significant changes have been made to the plans which include the following: one entrance onto Ellington Road as opposed to two (Ellington and Buckland Road) , the entrance has been moved westward, the site is now one contiguous piece of land of 21.43 acres as opposed to two pieces of approx. 18 acres. They have acquired a third parcel which makes the piece contiguous. He stated South Windsor has the need for additional commercial space. Attorney Kerensky indicated that the sensitive issue was tr i affic aid hope to establish that the level of service on the two roads would not change through some-modifications in the area. At this time he introduced Exhibit #1, the Site Development Plans proposed Town Shopping Center. Betsy Kaemmerlen, liscensed Landscape Architect for Fuss & O'Neill, described the' layout' of the plan. She stated there would be a double boulevard entry into the site with one lane entering and two lanes exiting. ^A car is able to circle throughout the site by the curved road which also leads through all the parking. , The offices are located on the outskirts with smaller parking lots, and the larger lot service the retail center. The trucks will enter off of Ellington Road and a service road has been provided behind the retail area for trucks to un- load. This area will be buffered with evergreens. The pedestrian circulation system, which connects off of the street, leads into an internal circulation system linked to -a11 the buildings. The plantings proposed will maintain an "open New England look". The retail area is set far back from the road, and therefore need some open vista' s from the road - therefore they are proposing to plant trees. They are proposing raised planters and extensive flower/shrub beds at the- retail entry. The landscape maintenance will attempt to match the look of the Samsel properties. The focal point of the area will be the Center where they show a proposed gazebo. However, Mr. Kelley is open to suggestions. He will offer this area for Town use, i.e. concerts, craftshows, etc. The size of the center green area is 1 1/2 acres. At this point, Attorney Kerensky entered Landscape Plan Sd7,sd8 as ex- hibits, and asked Ms. Kaemmerlen to explain the sidewalks. Ms. Kaemmerlen went on to discuss the sidewalks that would link the whole system together. She mentioned that the building coverage is only 13.6t therefore leaving a lot of green space. Attorney Kerensky introduced Phil O'Neill, the principle in Fuss & O'Neill and stated he was available to answer questions. Mr. Kerenrky�went on to state that all zoning regulations have been met. He stated there had been some concern about the affluent going to Ellington Road, and stated it would be no problem to direct it towards Buckland Road. Also, there was some questions of satisfactory easements for the surface drainage, and he stated there would be no problem getting surface drainage easements. Jim Ford, a liscensed traffic engineer, principle in the firm of Storch Associates, explained Exhibit #3, the Traffic Impact Study. He stated that his firm had conducted a previous study, but this was a different situation as only one driveway is proposed. He acknowledged that the Wapping five corners operates at F at peak hour and proposes certain mitigating measures to keep that intersection operating at that level. I • 1 TRRFF I r At•JM_*-r'S I S PF?OGF?'MI F,R i1Li_T: TOIIW SHOPPING CENTER LOCATI014 SOUTH IJIt-JOSOR CT. PER I OD AM PEAK: 7-8 All CONDITION: DES I GIJ YEAR 1991 '51TE GUIENUED TRAFFIC: 279 EIJTER 64;: 179 EX I T :: :j6% 100 ESCALATION ;:/YF! 2.OOY. SPECIAL IIE'V'ELOPMENT IF ANY Ni IME TRAFFIC GEN. 11 WARS F'RU.1, 5 EI-11 ER ll� 0 --------- EXIT 0;: 0 NAI IE_ TRAFFIC GUI. 0 STREETS _ ENTER I T;: 0 -'______ EXIT 0 APPROACH 1 RT. 31) APPROACH 2 N':A APPROACH 3 RT. 30 APPROACH 4 SITE DRIVE MOVEMENT CODE 1=ENTERING 3 2= EXITING) O=NOT AFFECTED MOVE COUNT C OUN T SITE 5I TE SPEC DEV .,SPEC DEV MOPE - SPEC DEV SPEC PONE TIME INCREASE NC]L TOTAL APPKIACH CODE VOLUME :: VOLUME % VOLUME ;: CODE VOLUME CODE YOLUME VOLUME 0 LEFT 0 0% 0 0': 0 04 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0.., FIF'Fhr_iACH 0 5TRCHT -42 too,,, 0 OX 0 O: 0 0 0;: 0 2h7 267 Ci7 C�7 1 1 RIGHT 0 U;: 39 22% 0 0;: 0 0 0% 0 0 39 1 RT. 30 TOTAL 1242 313 0 LEFT 0 FPP.. 0 0% 0 O O O 04 0 0 0 ERR FII F 1=r�f���H 0 0 U 0 EF�R 0 STRGHT 0 EPP. 0 0': 0 0;: 0 tl 0: 0 R I GHT O EPR 0 0% 0 0:, 0 0 CC: 0 0 O EPR N'.A TOTAL 0 0 r 1 LEFT 0 0% 140 78;. 0 0:. 0 0 C i; 0 0 1400 APPROACH 0 STP..GHT 839 100;: 0 0e: 0 0% 0 0 OX I 0 926 9 26 1066 3 O RIGHT 0 0:: 0 0-" 0 0 4 Ci O 0?. 0 0 0 RT. 30 TOTAL 839 140 I y 0 0;, 0 0 C�,: 0 O 78 785: 2 LEFT 0 ERR78 r 3,. �• Af'MlArH 0 STP.GHT 0 ERR 0 0% 0 0;: 0 0 r�.: 0 0 4 2 F I GHT 0 ERR 22 22i.% SIZE DPIVE TOTAL 0 100 i I I / TRRF'F I C VOL—UNE Rr4RL—YS I S PRCCRRrl I ,G 1ECT: TOWN SHOPP I NG CENTER LOCAT I01-1 SOUTH W I NDSOR CT. PER 100 PH PEAK. 5-6 PP1 COND I T I01-1: DES I G14 YEAS' 1991 TE GE14ERATED TPAFFIC: 576 ENTER 44Y. 254 E.X I T ,! 56•r. 322 ESCALATION X P 2.00% SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT I F A14Y 41E TRAFFIC GEN. 0 YEARS PR0.1. 5 E14TEP n;: 0 -------- EXIT OX 0 41E TRAFFIC: GEN. 0 STREETS ENTER 0." 0 - EXIT 0?: 0 APPROACH 1 RT. 30 APPROACH 2 N`.A APPROACH 3 RT. 30 APPROACH 4 5ITE DRIVE MOVEMENT CODE 1=E11TER I NG, 2= EXITING, 0=NOT AFFECTED MOVE COUNT COUNT SITE SITE SPEC DEV SPEC DEV MOVE SPEC DEV 5PEC MOVE TIME INCREASE VOL Ti)TAL APPROACH CODE VOLUTE is VOLUME Y. VOLUME is CODE VOLUME 'r: CODE VOLUME VOLUME 0 LEFT 0 0;., 0 0:: 0 0'l. 0 0 0 0 C� 0': PPPOACH 0 STRGHT 861 100:: 0 0, 0 0:! 0 0 0-: 0 951 951 1131 84 1 1 RIGHT 0 0It: 180 �1�: 0 „ 0:! 0 0 0;: 0 0 1�'%i 16% T. 30 TOTAL 861 180 0 LEFT 0 EF'R 0 0:: 0 Q:! 0 0 Ox 0 0 0 ERR OF POACH 0 STP,GHT 0 ERR 0 0-: 0 0 0 0 0;: 0 0 ci 0 ERR 2 0 RIGHT 0 ERR 0 ON 0 ox 0 0 0:: 0 0 G ERR Ik,A T 13THL 0 +) 1 LEFT 0 0% 74 29:: 0 0;: 0 I 0 0?: 0 0 4 16% tPFRUACH 0 STRGHT 346 100�: 0 Or 0 0 Ov 0 I 0 n;: 0 382 3,32 456 84r: 0 0:! I 0:. O 0 Cr: 0 0 0': 3 0 BIGHT 0 0of. )T. 30 TOTAL 346 74 2 LEFT 0 ERR 93 219ox 0 0y. 0 0 0.0 0 0 93 29X 322 0% iF f RCiACH 0 STRGHT 0 ERR 0 0;. 0 0.6 0 0 0% 4 ? P I GHT 0 EF'R 229 71:! 0 0:: 0 u 0f: 0 0 ?041 SITE DRIVE TOTAL 0 322 I i -=T I I 5 550 10 544 530 MPL SNET �jl \ DR% 5046 1 DR. I /DR.i DR. ( 1 DR.I _ - 1 6 UCK LAND ROAD Ce r7lC .� SNET# 55 -♦ SNET# 54 , SNET#53 1 / 2-20" --- 4 4�. SPRUCE MPL IOMPL. I 1 TOWN SHOPPING CENTER SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 1 &4O• ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Rr ' c��r STARCH wo ono PORM NO. • Tno Asi�OC1�TES nom v wLL cr ower airs.