HomeMy WebLinkAbout140 Rye Street (2) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
3 �`� ( The Commission will officially receive applications
Application No . at either special or Regular meetings
g g provided they
Received Date : were submitted to the Commission Chairperson, Secretar;
c t ion or Public Heari g by : or agent, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the
meeting at vnich they will be officially received.
No application officially received at a Special Meeting
Receipt No . I will be acted upon at that meeting.
i
APPLICANT: - 2 ""009z
ADDRESS : ` 1 1-' TELEPH0NEG��
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS :
ADDRESS :
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: _ --
'1001-
ZONE
NAME, ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE
DIRECTED :
TEL HONE
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING) MPR ✓F" 1°�6
1 . Zone Change to (public hearing requtoa�1)1�`�I d�Or
& zoning Commission
2. Filing for Subdivision rlanning
3 . Filing for Open Space Subdivision (public hearing required)
4. Filing for Resubdivision (public hearing required )
5. Special Exception to Article (public hearing required)
6 . Site Plan of Development
7 . Removal of Sand , Gravel, Clay or Quarry Stone & Ore (public
hearing required)
8 . Other (explain in detail )
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
AND SUBMITTED WITH 6 SETS OF ANS ( 7 sets if public hearing is re
FOE IT R ED BY PLANTING & Z . I`Gl CO SI
Appli 0�:
12/84
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
Fee Schedule and Policv
1. An application processing fee of $25 per lot ($50 minimum) is required
for: Subdivisions,.. resubdivisions, and open space subdivisions.
2. An application processing fee of $50 is required for: Change of Zone,
Zoning Amendment, Special Exception, and Earth Removal or Land Filling
Operations.
3. An application processing fee of $25 is required for Site Development
Plans, except: where new buildings/additions/renovations of 2,000 s. f.
or more are proposed, said fee shall be S50; said fee shall be $500
for Site Development Plans in the Designed Commercial Zone; $50 plus
$5 per dwelling unit for Adult Housing ($500 minimum) .
4. An application processing fee of $10 per acre ($300 minimum) is required
for a Change of Zone/General Plan of Development in the Designed
Commercial Zone.
5. An application processing fee of $100 is required for a Change of Zone/
General Plan of Development in the Multi-Family or DA-15 Residential zones; or
for a Special Exception/General Plan of Development for Adult Housing.
6. An application processing fee of $50 plus $5 per dwelling unit is
required for a Special Exception/Site Plan of Development in the Multi-
Family or DA-15 Residential zones ($500.00 minimum).
7. Application processing fees are non-refundable after the application
has been officially received by the Commission. Application processing
fees may be returned prior to the application' s official reception
provided a letter of withdrawal, signed by the applicant, has been
submitted to the Commission prior to the meeting at which said applica-
tion is scheduled to be officially received.
8. Applications unaccompanied by the required application processing fee
are incomplete, and as such may be returned to the applicant and
removed from the Commission' s agenda.
9. Complete applications and required fees shall be submitted at least
fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Regular or Special Keating
at which it will be received.
10. Fees for a previously denied application shall not apply to any
subsequent application. However, when a subdivision, resubdivision,
or open space subdivision application has been denied within the
preceding 12 months or approved for fewer lots than requested, and a
new application for the subject tract is submitted by the same appli-
cant, then the fee for the new application shall be a minimum of $50
plus $25 for each lot above and beyond the number of lots contained in
the earlier application.
11. A fee of $5 per sign is required for signs to be posted by the
applicant on the subject property.
12. Other Fees: Subdivision Regulations - $3.00; Zoning Regulations - $4.00;
Zoning Flap $1.00; fees for other documents is as determined by the
Commission.
13. All checks shall be made payable to "Town of South Windsor."
Adopted: 4/10/84
Revised: 12/4/84
-T4
41
V, e, i I' di C
c c
a
4e)
cx
lj
rj A
I LA
4e-
Wv
N
VV-)
r
cl Ll i-!,
SHEPARD-POLA, INC.
P.O. BOX 415
EAST WINDSOR HILL, CONN. 06028
TEL. 289-6414
I
�►�..
Via-
December 4, 1985
�1 .. ;
Planning & Zoning Commission �,� ' '�� los i
9 � 6
Town of South Windsor pEC
1540 Sullivan Avenue �jyiri�sOt fan
South Wi ndsor, Conn. 06074 c�ptlLr o��n� Goa'��s
Gentlemen: Qlarn��g &
t
As of December 15, 1985, Gaer Brothers Inc., of 140 George Road,
South Windsor is terminating their Lease with Shepard-Pola, Inc.
As of this date, we have two potential out-of-town customers which
would fall under Zoning Regulations 4722 and 4723, both occupying said
building, separated by a fire wall .
It would appear that both tenants would look for immediate occupancy
of said building in preparation for their start-up.
Would we need to come before Planning & Zoning with these two potential
tenants if we are changing said building from Warehousing only to
Manufacturing, Processing and Warehousing?
We look forward to your reply at your earliest possible convenience.
Time is of the essence.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
HEPARD-POL, C., /
. E. Shepa
President
JESIII:cpm
.5291
Planning & Zoning Commission -4- 3/25/86
voted in favor and so ordered.
4. Mountainview Estates, Section III - Dart Hill Road
The Town Engineer recommended the bond amount be set at $20 , 000 for
the improvements to Dart Hill Road. Mr. Abell made a motion to
establish a bond amount of $20 , 000 for such improvements, and Mr.
Sorenson seconded the motion. It was unanimously voted in favor
and so ordered.
5. Possible Drainage Projects
Mr. Hallowell made a motion to table this item, seconded by Mrs.
Montana and unanimously voted in favor.
6 . Zoning Amendment - Beverage Container Processing Operations in
Industrial and Industrial Park Zones
Mr. Hallowell said he doesn' t want this use permitted at all. Mr.
DeMallie said the amendment would provide special exception permits
with controls. Mr. Gilligan said the question is whether it is
better to regulate this use, or prohibit it.
Mrs. Rossi said the question originally was whether the Commission
would permit this use in the General Commercial Zone, and to look
at zones that already permit it so that the Commission can control this.
Mr. Sorenson suggested that both issues go to public hearing. One
amendment to prohibit the use in I and IP zones, and the other
to control it by special exception.
At this point, Mr. Kip Shepard, said he has 115 ,000 s. f . of his
building on George Road which is idle. Part of the building is being
leased to Moser. Mr.Shepard pointed out that Section 4 . 7. 2. 2 allows
the manufacturing, processing, packaging, or assembling of components
or goods. He said they are talking to Mobile Redemption as a
possible tenant. He noted that the Planning Director has seen Mobile' s
operation and East Hartford is being unjust to them. Everything
Mobile does would be done inside the building, and it doesn' t make
any difference what they do as long as it is going on inside the
building. A discussion ensued, and itvas noted that an application had been submitted (item k) for a site plan approval. Mr. Shepard
asked if it was necessary to update the site plan for this existing
building. After a brief discussion Mr. Shepard was advised to submit
a revised site plan.
Mrs . Rossi said she would like a legal opinion from the Town Attorney
as to whether this use can be prohibited. Mr. Hallowell made a motion
to schedule a public hearing on both proposed amendments and to write
to the Town Attorney for a legal opinion on whether this use can be
prohibited. Mr. Sorenson seconded the motion and itwas unanimously
voted in favor and so ordered.
Planning & Zoning Commission -3- 4/22/86
in favor and so ordered.
6 . Rainbow Hills (Home Farm Partnership)
Mr. Martel recommended a bond reduction from $280, 000 to $225 ,000.
Mr. Sorenson moved that the bond in the above matter be reduced
from $280, 000 to $225 , 000 . Mrs. Rossi seconded the motion and it
was unanimously voted in favor and so ordered.
7 . App. #1135 - Shepard-Pola, Site Plan, North side George Road
Mr. Kip Shepard was present. He said he submitted this site plan
at the request of PZC because there was no site plan on file for
this building. He said they plan to paint and fix up the exterior
of the building. There are tires in the field west of the building
which will be removed. Mr. Shepard questioned the necessity for
installing eastern white pines as indicated on the plans. Mrs .
Rossi said she agreed.
Marcia Banach, Assistant Planner, reported as follows : This is
an existing vacant building with 114 , 000 s. f. Applicant is
requesting a primary use change from warehousing to multi-occupant
industrial uses. The cul-de-sac illustrated on the plan does not
exist, and the pavement of George Road terminates in the parking area
to the west of the building. The site is completely surrounded
by I zoned land and truck traffic is likely to utilize Route 5
to Sullivan Avenue to Rye Street, all of which is industrially zoned
lane. Planning Department recommended the white pines to provide
a visual screening to the north and west. There are woods to the
east. The plans should contain a note indicating that the building
use is "multi-tenant industrial facility for manufacturing, processing,
packaging or assembling of components or goods; and warehousing. "
After a brief discussion,' Mr. Hallowell made a motion to approve
the site plan of development for property located on the north side
of Geroge Road, in an I zone, as shown on a plan prepared by Gardner
& Peterson Associates, dated 4-8-86 , Map No. 7674 , subject to the
following modifications:
1. The Eastern White Pine trees shown on the plan may be
deleted.
2. The site plan shall contain a note indicating the building
use is "Multi-tenant industrial facility for the
manufacturing, processing, packaging or assembling of
components or goods; and warehousing. "
A black and white mylar shall be submitted to this Commission
to be stamped and signed, -together with three blueprint copies.
The letter of approval of this Commission should be reproduced
on the mylar, which will be returned to the applicant after
it has been signed. The mylar must be filed in the Town Clerk' s
office within 90 days after it has been returned to the applicant.
Planning & Zoning Commission -4- 4/22/86
Mr. Abell seconded the motion and it was unanimously voted in
favor and so ordered.
8. Comprehensive Plan of Development
a. Draft of Future Land Use Map
The Commissioners reviewed a draft of the future land use map and a
brief discussion ensued regarding open space.
b. Utilities Element
The Commissioners unanimously endorsed the Utilities Element
draft dated March 24, 1986 , a copy of which is attached hereto
marked Exhibit A.
C. Transportation Element - Highway Plan - Goals & Recommendations
Copies of the attached draft Transportation Element (marked Exhibit
B) were distributed to the Commissioners.
d. Highway Plan - Major Reconstruction
Copies of cross sections for minor arterial, major collector and
minor collector roads were distributed to the Commissioners (attached
hereto marked Exhibit C) .
The Commissioners then reviewed the Highway Plan/Major Reconstruction
map which has been revised through August 1984. They agreed to
the following changes in reconstruction/realignment locations :
Add the Clark Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection;
Delete the Foster/Ellington Road intersection because it has
already been completed in connection with Strawbridge;
Eliminate the Route 5/Newberry/Colony Roads intersections since
this was recently completed by the State in conjunction with the
Route 5 light synchronization project;
Add the railroad crossing at Governor' s Highway due to increased
traffic volumes and its relatively poor condition;
Add the Troy Road/Brookfield Road intersection;
Add the hairpin turn on West Road south of Sullivan Avenue;
Add the Sand Hill Road/Ellington Road intersection due to
the necessity of additional turning lanes to accommodate peak hour
traffic volumes.
The following changes were agreed upon in connection with the Priori-
tized Reconstruction/Realignment Projects :
Add the reconstruction and realignment, and possible widening
of Route 30 between Pleasant Valley Road and five corners to the
first priority list;
Add to the first priority list the possible widening to four lanes
of Sullivan Avenue between five corners and Route 5;
A0�
0_� soam ?&nd440t
s v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
R•co�'�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, APRIL 26, 1986
LEGAL NOTICE
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
At the April 22, 1986 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission
voted to take the following action:
1. Approve, with modifications, the application of Shepard-Pola
Company, for a site plan of development for property located
on the north side of Geroge Road, as shown on a plan prepared
by Gardner & Peterson Associates, dated 4-8-86 , Map No. 7674,
I zone.
Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 23rd day of April, 1986 .
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Marshall Montana, Vice-Chairman
David H. Sorenson, Secretary
�AowN SC,(�
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
SOR-co�'�w AREA CODE 203/644-2511
April 29 , 1986
Mr. J. E. Shepard
Shepard-Pola
200 Sullivan Avenue n O`er
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
IG
Dear Sir:
Re: A Development
1135 Site Plan of Develo J
App. # p
North side of George Road
Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on
April 22nd to approve your application for a site plan of develop-
ment for property located on the north side of George Road, in an
I zone, as shown on a plan prepared by Gardner & Peterson Asso-
ciates, dated 4-8-86 , Map No. 7674, subject to the following
modifications:
1. The Eastern White Pine trees shown on the plan may be
deleted.
2. The site plan shall contain a note indicating the building
use is "Multi-tenant industrial facility for the manufacturing,
processing, packaging or assembling of components or goods; and
warehousing. "
Please submit a black and white mylar, with this letter of approval
reproduced thereon, together with three paper prints , so that it
can be stamped and signed by the Commission. After signing, the
mylar must be filed in the Town Clerk' s Office.
Yours very truly,
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
r
v By:
g
arshall Montana, Vice-Chair'marl
CC: T. D'Auria, Building Official
E. Belleville, Assessor /
P. DeMallie, Planning Director ✓
R. Martel, Town Engineer
10-27-86
Report on requested representation of Planning & Zoning at Town Council Meeting:
Subject:Mobile Redemption Location and Activity.
Minutes of P & Z meetings - pertaining to Mobile Redemption Location - were submitted
to the Town Council for their understanding of the process of the P & Z Commission.
n brief explanation of what the minutes contained and answers were given to both the
Council and those persons in the public who asked questions, by this P & Z representative
and by the building owner, Mr. Kip Shepard and one of the Mobile Redemption owner's, as
well as Chief of Police, Ryan.
In July, when Mobile Redemption was setting; up at it's location on Rye Street, the transit
syst m employed by M. R. was incorrectly dropping M. R. employees at the Shell AM, PM
location nt the corner of Sullivan and Rye Street. When Mr Shepard and the Mobile Redempt.
owners were finally made aware o." this problem(as well as any other, they immediately took
action to correct the problems. Mr Shepard had left his card with all telephone numbers
with the owner of the AM/PM - -prior to the M. R. re-location - asking that he be contacted
immediately if any problems occured. He was not contacted, by the owner as requested.
The South Windsor Police reports were in Jiily. in response to complaints by the AM/PM
ovmer, a motorist and an employee of Mobile Redemption. (the last one is still open)
On October 6th, the owner of the AM/PM Shell Store made a complaint to the Town Council
at the Town Council Meeting, as evidently suggested and supported by a group-active in
that area-who are seeking solutions to problems of that particular area of Town.
I strongly suggested that in the future, should any problem arise, t. P+ nontact be made
to the Town Manager's Office, prior to the Town Council, as the Town Manager could
direct the person or group to the proper town agency for a quicker and more positive
response. (In this case, I believe, it should have been the Town Planner and/or the
P & Z C. as it would have resulted in direct contact with the building owner and the
business owner with a much speedier conclusion/solution.)
Respectfully submitted,
M. Rossi
az4/"I rj�,
�j
71
Lk