HomeMy WebLinkAbout121 Talcott Ridge Road Electric# 121 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
Plumbing# 16 Pe TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD
HVAC # O l>kl�F144�f� Date: &t (l 3� � � q
�6. 26028
Sprinkler#
FINAL APPROVALS Estimated Cost 13 66�
Building COMPLETE RED BOXED AREAS Permit Fee 6 Q 8^
Engineering 2 Zo Sj TYPE OR PRINT ONLY Occupancy Fee $
Affidavit a SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE
Appr.for CO.`!�I, X s092 Total Fee /6/3
TO BU DING DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF SOUTH WNDSOR,CT (Additional Cost) `/y $
The undersigned hereby applies to do work according to the following specifications:
N.
fob Location o� r Lot No. 3 Side of Street Zone
Applicant 0 mil 0-tS (—(,C. Tel# 6 K(f-Z ao 6
Address 0 33 CZ- I Gi S. 61J(ucPca- Zip 660'2"( Lic.#
Own r Z't w�Q Address
Architect So-v4•.Q Address
Sq.Ft.N w Area: lst FL / U 2nd FL /ZtSo 3rd FL Total New Area
#Rooms Y"' #Lavatories / #Bathrooms 2- #Garages Z
Purpose of this permit: e
City Water Well ❑ Septic System ❑ Sewerl<
Ins. H.O. S.P. Cert. Area 30 5 Basement t 50-1 _ Garage
Approved by Dat 1�j Use Group Construction Type r09
Reused l/97
I hereby agree to conform to all the requirements of the Laws of the State of Connecticut and the Ordinances of the Town of
South Windsor and to notify the Building Inspector of any alteration in the plans or specifications of the Building for which this
permit is asked,and agree that this building is to be I ted the proper distaAce from all street lines,side yard lines,and required
distances from all other zones and is located in whi his Iluilding d* is allowed.
Signed
I hereby apply for a Certificate of p y fo hZ- orkdescr in this application for the permit.
Signed
DO WRITE B�/oW THIS LINE
INSPECTION COMMENTS
Location of Job: AFFIDAVIT Additional Fee$ SyO
State of Connecticut
ss.South Windsor
County of Hartford
Owner
1 3,bttr--� --?:�:6g1'oj of Agent for the building erected
Contractor
under Permit No. issued by the Building Department of the n of S t bei g
duly sworn,make oath and say that the actual cost of the completed work autho zed nde 'd pe it id t
exceed the most current accepted BOCA value of S. 1 act Z
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 641�- y
da of !f A.D.20 4 U
Estimated Cost S 57 1 000
Difference: S y-c i 21q Z
T
Notary Public
Inspection / Approval Date By Appl
Code Description Due Whom Code Comment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99-26028-B 134,000
B01 FOOTING 07/26/99 DCJ A
B02 FOUNDATION 08/04/99 DCJ A
B03 FRAMING (ROUGH) 10/26/99 DCJ D CUT TJI IN KITCHEN, 2 NAILS EACH END OF STUDS
TRUSS LATERAL SUPPORTS
E01 SERVICE 10/26/99 DCJ A RELEASED TO N.U.
E03 ROUGH 10/26/99 DCJ D REPLACE DAMAGED WIRE ABOVE 2ND FLOOR BATH
P03 ROUGH 10/26/99 DCJ A
H03 ROUGH 10/26/99 DCJ D DRAFT STOP DUCTS BETWEEN 2ND FLOOR AND ATTIC
B04 INSULATION 10/29/99 DCJ D CORRECTIONS NOT MADE IN DUCT CHASE DRAFTSTOPS
99-10630-H 9,000
99-10496-P 8,000
99-16520-E 6,000
Total Est Value 157,000
Dwelling 3,654 149,521.68
Basement 1,567 19,430.80
Garage 741 9,188.40
Smoke Det 7 525.00
BOCA Value 201,892.44
Difference 44,892.44 /PLp �'
1 �
SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
121 TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD LOT_#38 Reviewed By C A (Engineering)
CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed j'L47.,cjq9Ap ov Denied
2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By (Planning)
BP_# 26028 Ph_# (860) 648-2006 Date Reviewed Zj Approve enied
Date Submitted 12/17/99 ***** FOR C bfjb **
As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of
Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and
approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: .
Approved Denied N/A
1. Approved building permit plan
2. Finish grading per approved
building permit plan
3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs,
dumpsters, required parking
V/ 4. Utility location;
— :sz a. sanitary sewer/septic system
-S/ b. foundation drain
C. electrical & telephone
d. water
e. other (6ftA-S j
5. Sewer connection charge paid 5f�i5�1
6. Appropriate certification
7. Bonding
8. Planning & Zoning/
Inland Wetlands Considerations
Sewer Permit No. filsob 9051
Y
Pavement Excavation No.
COMMENTS:
bK�a iNAG�� 5wALJL 'Tm 8E Cp►�S�Rv�. c►� -112` 1
►K�s w��� 51L A4Co,,fP(JSUSC> A rap, scuN t>e-,RAAj , c9 RECE�vEp
d.�u.,.Fy FS-tnQcSS1�.r T cov rr�, w�oF� r,., $.> � , o D EC 17 1999
SOUM WINDSOR
ENG.DEPT.
A`a
SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
121 TALCOTT RIDGE ROAD LOT_##38 Reviewed By 75, PSuNJA, (En ineering)
CHASE ORCHARDS LLC Date Reviewed 5 9! pprove enied
2033 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By anning)
BP_#_26028_ Ph_##_(860) 648-2006 Date Review pprove Denied
Date Submitted 04/30/99 ***** FOR BUILDtNG P ****
In accordance with the Zoning and/or Subdivision Regulations, prior to the
building of any structure on a lot, a Topographic Plot Plan shall be submitted
for approval. The minimum requirements shall include:
Approved Denied N/A
1. Name, address & phone number of owner/applicant
2. Name, address & phone number of plan preparer
3. Zoning Information - i.e. zone, open space,
floodway, etc.
4. Plot Plan at 1" scale
a. Subdivision reference, abutting properties, etc
b. Easements of record
c. Lot description, bearings, building lines,
distances, area, etc.
d. Contours, existing & proposed, 1 or 2 ft.
interval where appropriate
e. Building location with dimensions.
Elevations of proposed finish floor, garage
floor & centerline of road at driveway
f. Elevations of gravity drainage systems, sanitary
/ & foundation drain at the house and the street
g. Tentative utility location (gas, water,
electric, septic system, etc.)
h. Title block with name and address of preparer,
date, appropriate certification, live seal and live
signature consistent with the Board of Registration
requirements. (P.E. & L.S. )
5. Sedimentation and erosion control
6. Special Planning & Zoning, Inland/Wetlands
considerations (Plans on file w/Town Clerk)
COMMENTS: 8
MAYhod
3
3999
� titi
DEPARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT
PERMIT#
Application is hereby: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR J b SAO
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit#
j 4C 644-2511 ext. 230 a
Date Building Inspector
Application must be printed or typed
` Location of Job:
FEE SCHEDULE
1011 740 �� � _
$0-$1,000=$13.00 Street No. Street Lot No.
Over$1,000=
$13.00 per$1,000
or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No.
APPLICANT Z11 rs r sa�n
APPLICANT ADDRESS
APPLICANT PHONE# g 71
O W N S OWNER
�< OWNER ADDRESS
�.�
O40 OWNER PHONE —c3 C4�o
C ESTIMATED COST$ o UC-'e 00
IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? E Yes 13 No
FEE ENCLOSED$ 00
OR.Cp11 TYPE OF JOB:
l�S
'New Installation
0 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT (Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION? OYES ❑NO
WRESIDENTIAL
❑BUSINESS CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY
❑ASSEMBLY
❑MERCANTILE FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY
❑EDUCATIONAL
❑INSTITUTIONAL ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE
❑FACTORY
❑ STORAGE ADDRESS
❑GARAGE
❑MIXED USE CITY STATE ZIP
(Other please specify)
TYPE OF INSTALLATION/WIRING METHOD lc.,n e-x
SIZE OF SERVICE c2 00 qtvjoSIZE OF MAIN CONDUCTORS V!0 ,SC c�
NUMBER OF METERS NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS AND RATINGS
NUMBER OF PANELS REMOTE DISCONNECT REQUIRED? ❑YES CVO
NUMBER OF LIGHT CIRCUITS _ NUMBER OF POWER CIRCUITS _
NUMBER OF SWITCHES NUMBER OF OUTLETS
NUMBER OF LIGHT FIXTURES L NUMBER OF HEAT CIRCUITS
NUMBER OF A/C CIRCUITS
SEPARATE HEAT LOSS AND A/C CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO
COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
Ao-5� 66
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. TYPE STATE
j�,
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT � �'''"� DATE l'0 L
�"'�� ww'r�� yKd.Kwp4_ip+.YaY �.elss*.R!+`yrY'"w'w!.'r�'`"'_r` w'°m'e+ �'.r°'?`.
INSPECTOR L DAT D TIME
LOCATION 2 �-
LOT
INSPECTION: CODE: RESULT(D/A) :
BUILDING:
ELECTRICAL:
4
PLUMBING: 20 v
o q ct (o
HVAC:
l�
OTHER:
DEPARTMENT DECISiOtiT APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT PERMIT#P
Application is hereby-: TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Bldg Permit#
APPROVED 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE C�a�
644-2511 ext. 230
Date Building Inspector
Application must be printed or typed
Location of job
121 Talcott Ridge Road Lot#38
Street No. Street Lot No.
FEE SCHEDULE
Floor Apt. No.
$0 - $1,000 - $12.00
Over $1,000
$12.00 per$1,000 OWNER Chase Orchards LLC
or any fraction thereof
ADDRESS 2033 Ellington Road
South Windsor, CT
OWNERS PHONE# 648-2006
APPLICANT Frank Mauri
ADDRESS Ica Rj-,acel 1
Eaci- Hart ford CvP 06108
C� ESTIMATED COST$ 8,000.00
o
C IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? x
_
IPA YES NO
FEE ENCLOSED $ 104.00
1
r TYPE OF JOB:
_x Original Installation
Alteration/Addition/Repair
Revised 10/96
APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT(Continued from reverse side)
TYPE OF BUILDING IS THIS APPLICATION ASSOCIATED WITH A
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION YES / NO
RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS ASSEMBLY CURRENT USE AND OCCUPANCY
MERCANTILE EDUCATIONAL FUTURE USE AND OCCUPANCY Single family dwelling
INSTITUTION
FACTORY ENGINEER'S NAME PHONE
STORAGE
GARAGE ADDRESS
MIXED USE
CITY STATE ZIP
(Other please specify)
TYPE OF INSTALLATION original SIZE OF MAIN DRAIN 4"
NO. OF TOILETS 4 STYLFsiphon NO. OF URINALS STYLE
NO. OF BATHTUBS 3 NO. OF SHOWERS 1 NO.OF LAVATORIES 5
NO. OF CONDUCTORS SIZE NO. OF STACKS 1 SIZE 3"
AREA OF ROOF NO. OF CATCH BASINS NO. OF FLOOR DRAINS
NO. OF OTHER FIXTURES 1 KIND whirlpool
ARE TOILET COMPARTMENTS VENTILATED TO OUTER AIR BY A WINDOW YES/NO
SIZE OF WINDOW 3 x 3 IF NONE C.F.M. OF VENTILATOR
SIZE OF DUCTS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK sewer
SIZE OF WATER MAIN 1" SIZE OF WATER PIPING&RISER 3/4" & 1/2"
WATER HEATER
TYPE gas MANUFACTURE,faer,
ean
TANKS SAFETY DEVICES
TEMPERATURE
CAPACITY 50 RELIEF VALVE 100 XL
TEST PRESSURE j()n WORKING PRESSURE I rn PRESSURE RELIEF VALVEnY _
TYPE MANUFACTURER
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
COMPLETE PLUMBING EM NEW FAMILY DWELLING
ING
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS
TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONN.BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
201334 P-1 0 f-AAAg
NAME STATE LICENSE NO. TYPE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
PHONE NO.289-9511 DATE 10/21/99
DEP 14
ARTMENT DECISION APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT PERMIT#
Appl
ication is hereby: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR R �� �
BUILDING DEPARTMENT to
APPROVE 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE Bldg.Permit#
1
644-2511 ext. 230
ate ding fIn�
Application must be printed or typed
FEE SCHEDULE / Location of Job:
$0-$1,000=$13.00 Street N . Street Lot No.
Over$1,000=
$13.00 per$1,000
or any fraction thereof Tenant Designation Apt.No.
APPLICANT
APPLICANT ADDRESS ) o cK.r-,4-j-P..-r C
APPLICANT PHONE# --2 02
OWN .S OWNER „�,S' �T -s'O C
OWNER ADDRESS
OWNER PHONE " �C 0
ESTIMATED COST$ G
IS THIS A CONTRACT COST? _;*Yes 0 No
CJ FEE ENCLOSED$
O�� TYPE OF JOB:
OR C' •
516ew Installation
13 Alteration/Addition/Repair Revised 8/99
APPLICATION FOR HVAC PERMIT (Continued from reverse side
TYPE OF SYSTEM: TYPE OF BUILDING:
HEATING SIDENTIAL
A/C 0 COMMERCIAL
VENTILATION ❑INDUSTRIAL
HEATING
❑ STEAM LOW PRESSURE LIMIT LBS. HIGH PRESSURE LIMIT LBS.
❑HYDRONIC L)SWARM AIR ❑UNIT RADIANT HEATER
EXISTING RADIATION ADDITIONAL RADIATION TOTAL RADIATION
DESIGN TEMP. OUTSIDE�_°F INSIDE�°F DIFFERENC17 'I- OF
TOTAL HEAT LOSS(BTUHK3y;2°F(HEAT LOSS SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY
APPLICATION)
DESCRIBE ALL HEATING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.)
06
GROSS HEATING CAPACITY(INPUT-BTUH) 0 G NET RATING(OUTPUT-BTUH)/ g PQ G
TYPE OF FUEL
❑ OIL-GPM OIL TANK LOCATION:❑INSIDE❑ OUTSIDE CAPACITY
❑GAS-INPUT LPG TANK CAPACITY ELECTRIC-KW
AIR CONDITIONING
DESIGN TEMP.OUTSIDE OF INSIDE OF DIFFERENCE _OF
TOTAL HEAT GAIN(BTUH) M0 0 (HEAT GAIN SHEET MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION)
DESCRIBE ALL COOLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING MAKE&MODEL NO.)
0 y y
TONNAGE_ COOLING CAPACITY(BTUH)
VENTILATION
DESCRIBE ALL AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT(INCLUDING KITCHEN EXHAUST EQUIPMENT)
TOTAL SIZE OF SYSTEM(CFM) FRESH AIR INTAKE(CFM)
(PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY APPLICATION)
FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK ( `X-� ��� '¢r��� ��`
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED AND IS TO
COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT BUILDING CODES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF SUCH WORK.
IRd6 // (5� Z,/ (? 0
CONTRACTORS LICENSE TYPE STATE
SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN DATE
t_ ennox C:)bjecti ve Guide to = nstal 1 ati on C:ompa'ri son
LOGIC Software Group
Lennox Industries Inc .
Dallas , TX
1 -800--527-3506
10/04/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 1
CHASE ASSOC..
JOHN DRAAN
PREPARED FOR : BLD . DEPT.
PREPARED BY : LARRIE MEYER / C .A. S .
FILE TITLE : ANDOVER
DESIGN TEMPERATURES (DEGREES F)
MINTER INSIDE 72 WINTER OUTSIDE 0
SUMMER INSIDE 75 SUMMER OUTSIDE 90
DAILY TEMPERATURE RANGE INDICATOR M
DESIGN GRAINS RELATIVE HUMIDITY 42
DEGREES NORTH LATITUDE _ 41
SUMMER AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 1 . 0
WINTER AIR CHANGES PER HOUR 0 . 7
AREA BTUH BTU►
SC, FT LOSS GAS.{
ROOM - 1 LIVING ROOM IN ZONE 1 14 X 14
WALL 12j3 R- 19 + '1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 88 317 ,j
WINDr,kq 3A D i'BLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 24 952 69;
TINT-PLAIN SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 ,
WALL 1 2-.J 3 F`- 1 9 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 88
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-W 24 952 1136
TINT-PLAIN "SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = '1
FLOOR 19A 'HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOO-R + NO IflS 196 21201
WINTER INFILTRATION 27. CFM 21161
5UMMER INFILTRATION 39 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 64'-'
LATENT GAIN 11113 L
PEOPLE 5 SENSIBLE GAIN 1 500
LATENT GAIN 1150 1.,
DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 6i90 437
TOTAL FOR ROOM 1 1 , 568 CU FT 196
SENSIBLE 71591 41806
LATENT 21263 L
•
• r
I
10/04/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 2
CHASE ASSOC .
i JOHN DORAN
AREA BTUH BTUfi
SQ FT LOSS GAIN
ROOM — 2 FOYER IN ZONE 1 11 X 12
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 40 144 37
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 12 476 34
TINT—PLAIN SHADING—DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING" COEFFICIENT = 1
DOOR 10H PANEL & WOOD STORM 36 933 241
FLOOR . 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 132 . 11483 C;
WINTER INFILTRATION 27 CFM 21161
SUMMER INFILTRATION 39 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 64 "
LATENT GAIN 11113 L.
PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 60('
LATENT GAIN 460 1_
DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 520 18
T T'.AL Fr,F; F; tj ?. 1 , 056 CU FT 132
SENSIBLE 5 , 717 ., 2 , 056
LATENT 11573 L
�1i.1�•�M1 �:• 7 { i �.�r ! i (. �� IN ZONE 1 14 X 11
ol
ti'VAI_ L 112•_ ? fr - J + i/ ? C,F; 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 88 317 82
+A17'NL) ttir ra. r; i.► :',i F P.MF Ct—R. GLASS MOOD FRM FACING—S 24 952 6()E
-TNT•-" IN `SHADING'--DRAPE':~ HAI..F DRAWN
-iADING Cf_)FFFIr'7"FNT 1
'4ALL 12•_i3 -R-- -19 + 1/2 OR- :3/4. INCH EXTR F'01'Y 88 317
FLOOR 1 9A I-iAF,..0 W-,:)r.,D OR ''SIN Y!_ FLOOR + NO INS 1 154 1 ; 7r 7 0 �
WINTER INFILTRAT-Ir)N 14 CFM 1 , 08 1
SUMMER INFILTRATION 19 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN
LATENT GAIN 557 !.
PEOPLE 5 SENSIBLE GAIN 150U
LATENT GAIN 1150 L
DUCT LOSS MULTI= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 440 268
TOTAL FOB; ROC)P1 3 1 , 232 CU _FT 154
SENSIBLE 41836 29949
LATENT 11707 L
ROOM — 4 FAMILY ROOM IN ZONE 1 16 X 15
4
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3J4 INCH EXTR POLY 92 331 86
s�
t � .
c
10/04/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 3
CHASE ASSOC .
•.JOHN DRAAN
f
AREA BTUH BTUH
SCE FT LOSS GAIN
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING.-N 36 1 ,428 64c
TINT--PLAIN SHADING--DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT =. 1 ,-
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 120 432 112
FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR * NO INS 240 21696 0
WINTER INFILTRATION 20 CFM 11621
SUMMER INFILTRATION 29 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 482"
LATENT GAIN 835 L
PEOPLE 5 SENSIBLE GAIN 1500
LATENT GAIN 1150 L
DUCT L0 S MULT= . 1 0 GAIN MULT= . 1 0 651 28:
TOTAL FOR ROOM 4 11920 CU FT 240
SENSIBLE. 71159 31110
LATENT 1 1985 I_
ROOM - 5 KITCHEN IN ZONE 1 23 X 17
WALL 12J3 R-- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 168 .605 156
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 16 635 288
TINT-PLAIN SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1 ,
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + ' 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 100 360 93
DOOR 10H PANEL &. WOOD STORM 36 933 241
FLOOR 19A HARDWOOD OR VINYL FLOOR + NO INS 391 41392 0
WINTER INFILTRATION . 30 CFM 21-342
SUMMER INFILTRATION 42 • CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 697
LATENT GAIN 11206 L
MECHANICAL VENTILATION 75 . 0 CFM 5 , 940 1 , 238
PEOPLE 5 SENSIBLE GAIN 1500
LATENT GAIN 1150 L
APPLIANCES 1200
DUCT LOSS MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 19521 541
TOTAL FOR ROOM 5 31 128 CU FT 391
SENSIBLE 16 , 726 51954
LATENT 41498 L
ROOM - 6 M , B . R , IN ZONE 2 e 16 X 30
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 104 ' 374 917
I
I ,
l
10/04/96 ,.,LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE :4
CHASE ASSOC .
JOHN DRRAN
AREA BTUH BTUH
SCE FT LOSS GAIN
WINDOW 3A -DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 24 952 696
TINT-PLAIN SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1
WALL 12,J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 116 418 108
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-N 12 476 21E.,
TINT-PLAIN SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADIN(5' COEFFICIENT = 1
WALL 12J3 R - 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 216 778 201
WINDOW! 3A DOUBLE PANE CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-W 24 952 11368
TINT-PLAIN SHADING-DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = ,1
CEILING 16G DARK R-30 INSULATION 480 1 $ 140 618
WINTER INFILTRATION 34 CFM - 21702
SUMMER INFILTRATION 49 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 804
LATENT GAIN 1 , 392 L.
MECHANICAL VENTILATION 50 . 0 CFM 3 , 960 825
PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600
LATENT GAIN 460 L
DUCT MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 1 , 175 553
TOTAL FOR ROOM 6 31840 CU FT 480
SENSIBLE 12 , 927 61086
LATENT 31280 l
ROOM - 7 E . R . 2 IN ZONE 2 13 X 11
WALL 12J3 .R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH' EXTR 'POC.Y 80 288 74
WINDOW 3A DOUBLE PANE' CLR GLASS WOOD FRM FACING-S 24 952 696
TINT-PLAIN SHADING--DRAPES HALF DRAWN
SHADING COEFFICIENT = 1
WALL 12J3 R- 19 + 1/2 OR 3/4 INCH EXTR POLY 88 317 82
CEILING 16G DARK R-30 INSULATION 143 340 184
WINTER INFILTRATION 14 CFM 11081
SUMMER INFILTRATION 19 CFM SENSIBLE GAIN 322:
LATENT GAIN 557 L
PEOPLE 2 SENSIBLE GAIN 600
LATENT GAIN 460 L
- DUCT LOB:W MULT= . 10 GAIN MULT= . 10 298 196
TOTAL FOR ROOM 7 1 , 144 CU FT 143
SENSIBLE 3-1275 21 1f4
�, LATENT 11017 L
' ' yr h'• r�T ' ., {' .. ,. „_ '^, T -4' , • r .,f , .., '-',$35t. A ..r �' . .A ,'_l,
10/04/96 LOGIC 1000 RESIDENTIAL LOADS ANALYSIS PAGE 6.
CHASE ASSOC .
JOHN DORAN
STRUCTURE TOTALS 16 , 536 CU FT 2 , 067
SENSIBLE 64 , 677 30 , 851
LATENT 18 , 357 L
___________________.._______________________________________-
MINIMUM Cooling. Capacity needed is 49 , 207 btu
at 90 degrees outside and 75 degrees, inside
Maximum Desi r,ed .Cooling Capacity is 56 , 589 btu
( 1 15% of Total Load)
_____.._______-___________w____.._-_______-___..____..__.._______
** * ********* ***** **** **** Version 92 . 12 ** **** ******* * ** ** ******
* This Heating and Cooling Load Computation was produced using the procedures
* and tables of the Air, Conditioning - Contractors of Amer•i ca ' s Manual J ,
* 3-eventh Edition . The accuracy of the calcul ,,ted loads depends upon the
* accuracy of the data used and the accuracy of the Manual .J load calculation
* pr,ocedur•es for• the given conditions . No war,r•anty , either, expressed or•
* -i'mpl i ed , is given by Lennox Industr,i es Inc . with respect to the accuIr,acy
* and/or, sufficiency of the information pr••ovi ded by this r•epor•t . •'
*******************************************************************************
F ,
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
860-648-2006
December 19, 2000
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling
Exterior Design Specialists, Inc.
Talaga Bros.
Dave Miller Construction
Newsom Construction
Rancgurt Construction
Design Works
Re: Woodbridge Roofing Leaks
Chase Orchards Subdivision
Lot's 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37and 38
Dear Contractor:
Regretfully I am sending you this correspondence. We each have suffered much
disappointment and loss with our involvement at Chase Orchards. Prior to the outset of the
Gerber Construction lawsuit and ultimate foreclosure by Glastonbury Bank and Trust, we shared
a healthy business relationship. Unfortunately when a project is siphoned for what has now
reached almost $1,000,000.00 it is impossible to overcome the demise that has occurred.
This correspondence is sent as notice to all parties concerned in this matter as a single
correspondence to avoid multiple letters concerning the same subject. In that vain, this
correspondence relates individual as well as collective lots referenced above of which you may
or may not have performed work at. Specifically at this time, I am aware roofing leaks are
occurring at lots 5, 9, 22, 27, and 34.
The Problem:
A roofing leak has occurred at five of the eleven Woodbridge homes that were built at Chase
Orchards. The construction requires a valley (cricket) be framed over the garage where the
garage roof meets the second floor sidewall of the bedroom that is located over the dining room
of the Woodbridge model. When this problem was originally discovered, Angelo D'Leo of
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling inspected the eleven homes and reported to me that in his
opinion the leaking is being caused by the valley that was not properly framed with a cricket
which would shed the water away from the sidewall and therefore prevent any leaking from
occurring.
Chase Orchards, LLC Opinion:
After the inspection and ensuing discussion, I originally concurred with the opinion of Angelo
D'Leo, however after further consideration and inspection of the valleys with others, I believe
improper roofing and flashing installation is causing the leaks.
Page 2, Woodbridge leaks
The installation of the roofing by Allphase Roofing and Remodeling in the valley area included
15 lb. felt paper installed under the roofing and Ice and Water that was installed under the IKO
Architectural shingles in the valley. Standard step flashing was installed along the sidewall and
around the corner of the front corner post were it meets the valley.
The problem that occurs is leaking in heavy rains and/or during freezing temperatures. Firstly
when heavy rain is experienced, the water is unable to move past the corner post quickly
enough without backing up against the corner of the house. This backing up is causing the
water to seep over the step flashing and into the house. Secondly, when freezing temperatures
are prevalent, rain and snow forms into an ice dam that again works its way over the step
flashing and into the interior sidewall. In addition the ice dam backs up in the valley and works
its way under the roofing shingles, and leaks through the valley.
Conclusion (see drawings enclosed):
15 lb. felt paper should first be applied over the roof sheathing. Ice and water should be installed
under the valley and be installed in a continuous method up the sidewall and the front wall
where the wall meets the corner post. Ice and water should extend at least 36" beyond the open
side of the valley. Seams should be tarred to insure sealing. At the corner post, if necessary
additional Ice and Water should be installed to ensure a tight seal at that point. This requires
careful installation of the Ice and Water to ensure a solid seal. Step flashing should be installed
in a reverse method so as to extend higher on the sidewall. This would require additional or
(double courses) to be installed with each course of the roofing shingles. Roofing should then
be installed and the valley shingles should be sealed (tarred) on each course.
It is our opinion, if the above method of installation was used, there would not be any leaking on
Woodbridge models. Mr. D'leo disagrees, and claims the valleys installed by the framing
contractors are improperly constructed and that new crickets need to be installed to prevent the
leaking. Allphase Roofing and Remodeling was hired as a professional experienced in the
residential roofing business. It was expected they would use that experience and proper
installation methods to ensure a quality job that would not leak. The method of installation by
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling did not provide that installation and in our opinion they are
responsible to make corrections to any and/or all Woodbridge models.
Mr. Adebola H. Owodunni the owner of Lot 5 has notified Chase Orchards, LLC that his roof is
leaking. He has obtained an estimate from Barnett Construction Co. (copy enclosed) to make
these repairs. I am informed, he is not contracting with Barnett to make these repairs, but is
entering into an agreement with Angelo D'Leo of Allphase Roofing and Remodeling to make the
repairs at a lesser cost. It is Mr. Owodunni's position that he will have the work repaired and file
a suit to recover the cost of repairs from Chase Orchards, LLC. Chase Orchards, LLC will
implead all parties concerned in this matter if that occurs. We do anticipate a conclusion would
result in responsibility to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling.
John J. Doran
Chase Orchards, LLC
Cc/ John Collins, Building Inspector Town of South Windsor
Terrance Zehnder, State of CT, Dept of Consumer Protection
Bola Owudunni
CONT RIDGE VENT
SHINGLES
TOP OF m
•
FIN CLO CONT.
fir
VENTED SOFFIT
FIN.FLR. SIDING . ._
r
Z:
FIN FLFL
FRONT ELEVATION
ARCHITECTU
se�-
ININDSC
21r4' r-0- dam•
Y-0' 4•-0- 4'-0- 4'-r
2-r
h to-r 4
e / IT-4 ur
b IP d Q• 4*-W E-0• BEDROOM 2
2-r4r J° o
Q m I A b THROE DRAW
1' g MASTER BEDROOM io !- I q RlMtom
VT(� �/ !3 W THO W
3 DEBION ri
b 7-0• 7-W LE(
h 2.7-0 7
" u 7417 2•z-Qti Assoc
a;
7-4- ra- ID 't` 2033 EL
eat ;;LL
SOUTH Wi
19,
§ W.I.C. BEDROOM 3 19
2.7-0-H
U274rr.t- tt•-t• " e•o• r-0 Ur ,r-r
I? W
10 OPEN TO
BONUS RM. BEDR 4 FOYER
MICROIMA LVL - p - -MICROIAM LV -
L 3'-0- 4'-0• 7'-0• 4'-0'
. oho !2 Yca
•�a` Silk a 11 b W
y In. C o► Itf, Poll+$ a O
O
H � 0'-0• 4'-8-
W
RE-ENGINEERED ATTIC TRUSS 24'O/C V t N Sol 1lp
Y 64r�ajt ���� 4 w 11 s
1
3'-0• 4'-0'
E'-0' !f-0• 5'•,0• 5-t0' 4'-0' 4'-0• 3'd' E'-0' 7'd•
e'-,r ,z-0• a-s• ,r-0• e•-0•
j1 i 2d00 11: 40 6606684822 BARNETT CONST �-
Page No. of rages
`! BARNETT CONSTRUCTION CO. 5022
127 SPENCER S7
SUFFIELD,CT 06078
1-860-668-48=
uC.#54MB5
P OSAL SUB►arT'rE0 TO • PHONE DATE
I DLA w VIuN � w - /01/� 0-0
JOB NAME
S
1 ►r LC4 12i CR (ZD
CITY, TE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION ,
JOa PRONE
ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS
Wo homy submd spedttcatione @no ewknates for:
I
_3P-t n
hereby to furnish materi I and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications,forthe sum of,
dollars(3 )
Payment to macro dS oilows:
FOR ACCOUNTS OVER 30 DAYS I4t%PER MONTH.18S PER ANNUM
AI,matey i l m la guaranteed to be as txfied. to be co ted In a workmanlike
manner ord,ng to standard practi S Any aftosilron ordewaUon libm above specifications Avthonred I I
! involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders,and will become an extra 51gnatur•
cr.i%Q ova,ano above the estimate All agreemAnIS contingent upon strikes,accidents or I
obtays oeyono our control.Owner to carry fire,tornado ano other necessary Insurance Our Not Is Pr be
withdrawn by A not pted wAttttn Sys
workers are fully covereo oy Workmen's Compensation Insurancs. '
1
3►GNATURE
/
�\
Ampta nre Df f ropDHaI —The above prices.spectficat,ons and
!; condtons are sattslactory and are hereby accepted You are autnorized to do the
work as spectfied Payment will bo made as outlined above
t '
i DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. 510NATURE
I�
DEC 1 '00 12:44 8606684822 PAGE.002
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
February 14, 2001
Allphase Roofing and Remodeling CERTIFIED MAIL
3 Enfield Street
Windsor Locks, CT 06096
Re: Chase Orchards Roofing
Woodbridge Models
Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38
Dear Angelo:
Recently you made repairs to the roof at lot# 5 at Chase Orchards to stop the leaking that was
occurring. I have inspected the work that you completed with an independent roofing contractor
and it appears the work has been completed satisfactorily. In our previous discussion after my
letter to you of 12-10-00, you indicated it would be necessary to install a cricket to correct the
leaking that was occurring. You further indicated that the reason the roofs were leaking was
because crickets were not installed by the framing contractors and if they had been the original
roof installations could have be done correctly and the roofs would not have leaked. When you
made the corrections to lot# 5 you did not install the crickets you insisted were needed. Per my
previous correspondence to you dated 12-10-00 1 disagreed with you position regarding the
crickets and provided a written as well as a plan illustration of the method that should have been
used to install the roofing correctly. My independent roofing contractor Mr. Leonard Barrett has
confirmed my position regarding the crickets you claimed should have been installed and of the
installation method I provided to you. It appears you applied that method to correct the leaking
at lot# 5
You stated in a telephone message to me after receipt of my 12-10-00 correspondence that we
did nct provide sufficient materials for the correct installation. As you are aware, our agreement
for your services provided that we supply all materials except nails for the installation. Part of
those materials was Ice and Water Shield You stated in your message that we did not supply a
sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the valleys. May I remind you your
workmen were not limited in quantity to the materials that were ordered by us for roof
installation. We relied on you as a professional roofer experience in proper roofing application.
We in fact did supply a sufficient amount of Ice and Water Shield to correctly install the roofing
at all homes in Chase Orchards, however if you or your workmen indicated additional Ice and
Water Shield was necessary for the Woodbridge models, it would have been supplied to you as
it had on numerous occasions when your men indicated you were short materials.
There remain eleven additional Woodbridge models at Chase Orchards, some continue to leak.
am enclosing a copy of Mr. Barrett's estimate to make the repairs to these eleven homes. I
would like to give you the opportunity to make the repairs. Please contact the homeowners
Page 2, Allphase
listed on the enclosed ASAP to determine if any leaking is occurring and make repairs to homes
that are leaking. Additionally the roof leaks have caused damage to the drywall and paint in
several of the houses. I believe your insurance would cover the cost of those repairs and
would request you contact them for inspection of the repairs that are necessary. You may want
to make the repairs with your own workmen and I would agree if you were inclined to do so.
These homeowners have been very patience in this matter and I would hope you would act
expeditiously to make these corrections so as to not inconvenience them further.
Thank you,
John J. Doran, Member
Chase Orchards, LLC
Cc/
Glenn Terk
John Collins
Terry Zenhder
Erin & Mary Cole
Bolla & Saundra Owodunni
Scott & Laura Snyder
John & Pam Valente
Frank & Jewel Amoruso
Charles & Sandra Graves
Steve & Susan Suprenant
Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri
Jack & Susan Archambeault
Carl & Beth Bishopric
Jim & Kathryn Elder
Wally & Ranke Orsamolu
Chase Orchards, LLC
POB 752
Essex, Connecticut 06426
February 14, 2001
Re: Chase Orchards Roofing
Woodbridge Models
Lot's 4, 5, 9, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 and 38
Dear Chase Orchards Homeowner:
As you are aware, some buyers of Woodbridge model homes have experienced leaking
between the sidewall of the upstairs front bedroom/study into the garage and sometimes
basement area. We have worked diligently to have these repairs made by Allphase Roofing and
Remodeling and I am hopeful they will make the repairs to other homes as they have to lot# 5. If
the repairs are not made within 30 days receipt of my letter to Allphase Roofing and Remodeling
(copy enclosed), Chase Orchards will file small claims action against Allphase Roofing and
Remodeling for each home that has a leaking roof, and will have the repairs made by Mr.
Barrett.
Thank you,
John J. Doran, Member
Chase Orchards, LLC
Chase Orchards Homeowners:
Lot# 4 Erin & Mary Cole 648-2714
Lot# 9 Scott & Laura Snyder 648-9097
Lot# 22 John & Pam Valente 644-2270
Lot# 26 Charles & Sandra Graves 648-9661
Lot# 27 Frank & Jewel Amoruso 644-2392
Lot# 30 Steve & Susan Suprenant 648-0034
Lot# 31 Bharat & Vijaya Kolluri 648-4032
Lot# 34 Jack & Susan Archambeault 285-5117 Jack work
Lot# 36 Carl & Beth Bishopric 648-4686
Lot# 37 Jim & Kathryn Elder 648-4406
Lot# 38 Wally & Ranke Orsamolu 648-4481