Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
App 16-51P STAR Center
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING 8s ZONING COMMISSION - -- ED APPLICATION FORM Application Number: 61a JJ 17 SEP 0 6 2016 Official Receipt Date: 1 3 1 Munis Application #: / O SOUTH N1INDSOR PLANNING DEPT. APPLICANT: Tellier Properties, LLC PROJECT NAME: S.T.A.R. Center COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2045&2063 John Fitch Boulevard OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Paul R.&Judith M.Tellier OWNER ADDRESS: 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor,CT 06074 GIS PIN # 47702045&47702063 ZONE A20 R5NOZ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE& EMAIL ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor,CT 06074 860-291-8755 pdemallie@dpinc.co Estimated presentation time: 30 min. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) [IOpen Space Subdivision/Resubdivision (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ® Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑X Minor ❑ Major f 7 3 ►-m`f ❑ Conditional Subdivision X❑ Special Exception to Table 5.8.4 B.5 (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ® Site Plan of Development ® New ❑ Modification Building(s) Sq Ft 24,810 ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Dept of Motor Vehicle License - State Hearing per Section 14-55 for ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 7.6) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 7.16) (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision -Attach proposed amendment (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit Renewal (Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Detached In Law Apartment or ❑Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation (Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Other(explain in detail) *An Application Pending Sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten(1.0) days prior to being heard by the Commission. t 9 Sikatur Applicant SigiiatureofProperty Owner P.O. BOX 1 167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 8onalsi .8757 .com www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island • • September 6, 2016 • Narrative Statement Site Plan/ Special Exception/Resubdivision South Windsor S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard(U.S. Route 5) South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj.No. 3300 Project Summary: The South Windsor Star Center is a proposed recreational facility on a 3.7 acre parcel fronting on U.S. Route 5 at the Crow Park Road(Scantic Road) signalized intersection, which is very close to the East Windsor Town Line. A new paved entrance drive will become the fourth leg (westerly) of this intersection. The underlying zoning district is A-20, and the application comes under the new Route 5 North Overlay Zone. The building has a footprint of 18,000 square feet,with a proposed 6,810 sq. ft. mezzanine (this may be built at a later date). No commercial kitchen is planned. Food and beverages are expected to be available through vending machines, or a caterer with off-site kitchen. The building will be sprinklered for fire protection. There are 93 parking spaces in a formal parking lot(100 required, request 7 spaces in reserve to be built only if needed). The site will be served by public water and a septic system. Applications : have been submitted to the Inland Wetlands Agency, and Planning&Zoning Commission. Approval from the Connecticut Department of Transportation will be required for the new access drive and traffic signal improvements. Bubaris Traffic Associates has written a Site Traffic Evaluation Study,which recommends two new signal heads, and related improvements, to serve the new access drive. The intersection will remain at very good to excellent levels of service. It has a satisfactory accident experience.No significant traffic-related improvements are recommended. This report is being revised to reflect the reduced scope of the development and smaller building size. : The indoor recreation facility will feature large practice areas,three lease areas for tenants, a foyer, bathrooms, elevator, offices and a vending area. The primary tenant for the building is a large youth-oriented competitive cheerleading group, known as ECE All-Star Cheer, which represents a merger in 2014 between the Phoenix All Stars and the East Celebrity Elite franchises. This group competes nationwide, and most teams are ranked in the top ten in the nation. With its limited space,the group is presently at 85 athletes plus coaching staff. Many of the program's participants are from South Windsor. The building will also serve other youth and adult recreation groups, such as soccer, cheerleading,basketball,volleyball,tennis, and gymnastics. Many of the anticipated tenants were co-applicants with Phoenix All Stars for the zone change and zoning amendment to create the Route 5 North Overlay Zone, which allows the subject use. Current building scheduling indicates there will be numerous hours available to groups (youth, adult and seniors), including the Town's recreation department programming. The Town has a shortage of • G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Applications\3300,9-6-16 Narrative.docx : indoor gymnasium space. The new Orchard Hill Elementary School, for example, will have a smaller gym, which is typical for the Town's elementary schools. The South Windsor S.T.A.R. Center will thus help to meet this need, albeit privately funded, staffed, operated and maintained, and paying real property and personal property taxes to the community. It has been endorsed by the South Windsor Economic Development Commission. Typical contemplated maximum hours of operation are M-TH 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., and 7 a.m. to midnight on weekends and holidays. Available parking (93 spaces, expandable to 100), will be more than adequate for anticipated S.T.A.R. Center activities. The facility in East Windsor currently used by ECE All-Star Cheer has only 22 parking spaces and functions adequately, since most participants are dropped off and picked up by a family member for normal daily operations. • The Tellier property presently consists of two parcels, the first of which contains the residence of Paul&Judith Tellier (2063 John Fitch Boulevard), and the second of which contains the residence : of William&Laurie Tellier(2045 John Fitch Boulevard), and a large tree farm. The property will be resubdivided to include a 45.75 acre tree farm(statutory division), in South Windsor and East Windsor, a 3.7 acre parcel for the new indoor recreation center(2075 John Fitch Boulevard/Lot No. 1), and reconfigured house lots for the two residents at 2063 (Lot No. 2) and 2045 John Fitch Boulevard(Lot No. 3). The Tellier's seasonal Christmas Tree farm will continue operations. All Christmas Tree customers will be routed through the signalized intersection,receive a saw, and will then proceed from there directly to the farm's fields to select their desired tree. Access easements are depicted to maintain the tree farm. • With respect to the site plan,please note that we have observed an 80 feet separation from the toe of the slope westerly of the site's drives,parking and buildings. Also,the site plan has evolved, and there is no longer consideration for large public gathering events, such as competitions. It is primarily a practice facility for recreation activities. An emergency vehicle access drive easement is provided over 2045 John Fitch Boulevard(i.e. Lot No. 3). Also,while an on-site septic system is proposed, the design accommodates a stub for a future connection to a public sanitary line, should it become available (there is an existing public sewer nearby in East Windsor). The applicant plans to commence facility construction in the Autumn of 2016, and to complete construction in the Summer of 2017. • eaign • G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Applications\3300,9-6-16 Narrative.docx S TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS SUBDIVISIONS/RESUBDMSIONS APPLICANT PROJECT NAME 5.z.A.R , C.�EP.iT�R This checklist must be signed by plan preparer(P.E/L.S) declaring that alLrequired information is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied. Subdivision Minor ftular I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION A. GeneralInfonnation J1. Appl. &owner name, address x x ✓ 2. Engineer&land surveyor name, address, license no. / &seal x x f 3. Key map at 1" = 100'scale showing location of tract with reference to surrounding properties, streets, municipal boundaries, etc., within 500'. Key map must include: x x La. Outline,of buildings. ✓ b. Layout of streets and lots. c. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500 / feet d. Names of abutting property owners. N A e. Proposed"open spaces and recreation areas. f. Driveway arts on abutting properties and any properties across from proposed site 2 Subdivision Minor Regular g. Distance to and name of nearest intersection street. J4. A schedule of required and provided zoning district requirements including lot area, lot frontage, lot depth,yard setbacks, open space.variances granted, etc. x x S. North arrow and scale. x x J6. Appropriate certification block. x x J7. Date of original drawing and all revisions. x x 8. Name of development x x B. Plot plan at I"= 40'scale an standard 18"x 24'or 24"x 36"sheets with a 1/2'" ruled margin containing the following data. Developments which require more than two 24"x 36"sheets may submit the plot plan at 1" = 100'scale. x x lo. Metes and bounds description showing dimensions, bearings, curve data, length of tangents, radii, arcs, chords, and central angles for all centerlines and rights-of-way, and centerline curves on streets. Monuments are required at comers and angles of all new streets and new street lines, at all points of curvature and tangency,and at critical comers and angles of all new Town open space. Coordinates for / monuments shall be in tabular form. x x ✓ CGS datum shall be used on all subdivisions accessible to controls. The Town Engineer shall determine the accessibility of these controls. 3 Lot layout numbers, square footage of all lots, and all lot dimensions. Iron pins are required at all property angle points. No lots shall be divided on 2 / sheets. x x ✓ Yard setbacks dimensioned. x x J 5 Easements, noting grantors, grantees and purpose. x x must be shown in table format, e.g. below Grantor Grantee Type of Date Filed V01/Pg Easement 3 Subdivision Minor Regular 6. Development phasing, If proposed. x x Names of abutting property.owners. x x N/A 8. Proposed street names (use approved list of names). x x N/A 9. All open space reserved for common or public uses. x x �10. Appropriate A-2 certification &LS seals. x x H Topographic map at same scale as plot plan containing all dataincluded on the plot plan plus the following: / :/ 1. All existing structures, streets,wetlands and existing watercourses, or other environmentally structs sensitive areas, including enough data streets x beyond property boundaries to allow a wednds reasonable evaluation of the property's fldpin ecological relationship to surrounding areas, 100 yr. floodplain. x Existing and proposed contours to extend a x sufficient amount beyond subject property, to determine the effects on the property as follows (town mapping): 100' x up to 3%grade: I'contour interval ` 3%grade&over; 2'contour interval 3. Boundary limits, nature, and extent of wooded areas, specimen trees, and other significant physical features. x x ✓ 4. Existing system of drainage of subject site and of any larger tract or basin of which it is a part(can use Town stormwater x x study). ✓ 5. Drainage area map. * x ✓ 6. Drainage calculations * x J7. Perc test data, preliminary indication of septic system feasibility if individual sanitary * x sewerage systems provided. 4 Subdivision Minor Reaular ✓ 8. Proposed utility infrastructure plans, inducting sanitary sewer. water, storm water management. * x 9. Spot and finished elevations at all property comers,comers of all structures or dwellings, or proposed first floor elevations x x J 10. Construction details(per standard specs.) x 11. Road and paving cross-sections (per, standard specs). * x /�12. Proposed street names. x x 13. Landscape plan and details. x x J/ :14. Site identifications signs, traffic control signs, and directional signs. * x P� 15. Sight triangles at new road intersections. * x N P 16. Sight triangles at driveway entrance x x (where there may be a question).. J 17. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns (less detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan, and general plan of development. * x III . Plans and profiles(1"= 40'horizontally and 1" = 4'vertically) showing the following: x b( A . a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. x rJ A b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, and partial lot lines x 5 Subdivision Minor Regular L\ A c. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades, all tangent grades, and all vertical curve information x d. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage pipe material to be described. x n! A e. Typical/critical cross-sections where grading is outside street right-of-way or is at street right- of-way. x N A f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook, sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. x N/_A g. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including pipe material, elevations, sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for habitable buildings shall be shown. * x ✓ 15. Traffic report(by traffic engineer) Po 16. Open space site improvement plan. * x ✓ 17. Architectural elevationsrnformation per Sect. 8.70 of the zoning regulations * - if required by Town Engineer ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION. Date L Plan P parer(PE/LS) February 2002; updated 7/28/05; updated 6/7/11 W:\Planning Admin\Forms\Check Lists\Subdivisions Check List.doc t IP 7SCP 62016 SOUTH WNDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Stormwater Drainage Report South Windsor Star Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT IICI lllif//// C 0 ,A67C���'% �� y,.Y z; = ;< o'• 27475 a Prepared by: Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 rofiessionals September 6, 2016 Table of Contents Section Page Summary 1 Site Conditions 1 Storm Water Management&Water Quality 1 Storm Sewer Analysis 1 Sedimentation&Erosion Control 2 Low Impact Development Component 2 Conclusion 2 Appendices A NRCS Soil Survey B Stormceptor Report C Storm Sewer Analysis Results D Catchbasin Watershed Delineation (DA-1) 1. SUMMARY This project involves the construction of a 17,900 sf commercial recreational facility, paved access drives and parking areas, an onsite septic system, stormwater collection system, landscaping, connection to utilities and associated site improvements. There are regulated inland wetlands on the property as delineated by John Ianni, a certified soil scientist. There is no proposed filling of any regulated inland wetlands with this proposal although there is proposed work within the 80' upland review area. A portion of an existing paved/gravel driveway to the farmland to the west of the proposed building will be relocated in order to maintain access to the rear portion of the property. The site also contains 2 existing residential homes which will be re- subdivided onto separate lots. These houses are connected to municipal water and both lots will have code complying septic areas in conformance with the Connecticut public health code. 2. SITE CONDITIONS The topography of the site varies from a relatively flat(24%) in the eastern 250' section along John Fitch Boulevard with a steep embankment down to another relatively flat flood plain area. The soils in the development area according to the NRCS web soil survey generally consist of Agawam Fine Sandy Loam, 0 to 3% slopes (HSG: A) and Windsor Loamy Sand, 0 to 3% slopes (HSG: A). The west portion of the development area is classified as Saco Silt Loam. The NRCS mapping also indicates an"eos" delineation (escarpment) which symbolizes a steep slope or cliff associated with the Connecticut River valley flood plain. See Appendix A for NRCS web soil survey data. 3. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT &WATER QUALITY Stormwater runoff from the proposed site development area will be collected in catch basins and piped through a Stormceptor STC 900 water quality unit for treatment. The proposed stormceptor unit will serve to remove suspended solids if runoff before it is discharged to a proposed plunge pool to be located to the west of the main site disturbance. Based upon manufacture's specifications, the unit is designed to achieve an 80% total suspended solid removal rating as recommended by The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. See Appendix B for sizing and analysis reports for the Stormceptor unit. This report was generated using design software from their manufacturer Imbrium Systems Inc. Due to the sites close proximity to the Connecticut River and associated flood plain, limiting post-development peak flows to be equal to or less than pre-developed peak flows is not required or warranted. 4. STORM SEWER ANALYSIS The proposed subsurface stormwater collection and conveyance system was designed to adequately convey proposed runoff under 10- year storm event conditions. The design of the storm sewers followed the guidelines set forth in the Connecticut Department of Transportation's Drainage Manual. It is estimated that during a 10-year storm event, all proposed subsurface culverts will convey storm runoff without resulting in any unacceptable flooding conditions. 1 Hydraflow Storm Sewers computer software was used for analysis. The computations are included in Appendix C, and a catchbasin watershed delineation map is provided in Appendix D. 5. SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL The project will take place in 1 phase. Erosion controls that will be implemented to minimize soil erosion and control sediment include: • sediment fence or wood chip berms installed downgradient of construction areas • anti-tracking pad at the construction exit • stone check dams in channel areas • water quality units for filtering stormwater prior to discharging into infiltration areas • staked hay bales or silt sacks installed at all catch basins after installation until paving is initiated • rip rap outlet protection at all discharge points • staked hay bales or approved equal at discharge outlet areas 6. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT In order to reduce the overall water usage on site, a rain water harvesting cistern will be installed. All captured roof runoff during storm events will be conveyed to the cistern for storage. In the event that the maximum capacity of the cistern is exceeded, an overflow connection to to the main drainage system is proposed. The cistern will allow for irrigation of the lawn areas and other landscaping features. The final design of this irrigation system is to be determined by others. 7. CONCLUSION It is our opinion that the proposed stormwater management design as presented on the accompanying site plans, will not pose any significant detrimental impacts to the environment surrounding the site. 2 Appendix A NRCS Soil Survey 3 Soil Map—State of Connecticut 3 (South Windsor Star Center) 698500 698530 698560 698590 698620 698650 698680 698710 698740 698770 698800 41°574"N 410 52'4"N M n n M O N M O N OJ n M 0 C 5 rz p M F M p F ^8 �Mp V p i; M 41°51'58"N 41°51'S8"N 698500 698530 698560 698590 698620 698650 698680 698710 698740 698770 698800 3 3 Map Scale:1:1,460 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet Meter; i NN 0 20 40 80 120 /V 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84 tJSpq Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Appendix B Stormceptor Report Starmceptore a " I . d Brief Stormceptor Sizing Report - Star Center South Windsor Star Center 3300 South Windsor Connecticut United States of America 9/2/2016 Daniel Jameson Design Professionals Inc 860-291-8755 djameson@dpinc.co Stormwater Treatment Recommendation The recommended Stormceptor Model(s)which achieve or exceed the user defined water quality objective for each site within the project are listed in the below Sizing Summary table. Star Center • - 80 • • 80 • H V •• - STC 900 The recommended Stormceptor Model achieves the water quality objectives based on the selected inputs, historical rainfall records and selected particle size distribution. Stormceptor Sizo Summary Stormceptor Model %TSS Removal Provided STC 450i 72 STC 1200 80 STC 1800 80 STC 2400 84 STC 3600 85 STC 4800 88 STC 6000 88 STC 7200 90 STC 11000 93 STC 13000 93 STC 16000 94 StormceptorMAX Custom Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report—Page 1 of 2 Start cept©re Sizing ObjectiveDrainage Area Water Quality 2 s7 so.o Rainfall 52.2 HARTFORD WSO AIRPORT Connecticut 3456 • Stream Storage 52 41°56'17"N 0.000 0.000 72°40'57"W Up Stream FlowDiversion ■ • on selectedThe PSD defines TSS removal 20.0 20.0 1.30 60.0 20.0 1.80 150.0 20.0 2.20 400.0 20.0 2.65 2000.0 20.0 2.65 MQM • Stormceptor performance estimates are based on simulations using PCSWMM for Stormceptor,which uses the EPA Rainfall and Runoff modules. • Design estimates listed are only representative of specific project requirements based on total suspended solids(TSS) removal defined by the selected PSD, and based on stable site conditions only, after construction is completed. • For submerged applications or sites specific to spill control, please contact your local Stormceptor representative for further design assistance. For Stormceptor Specifications and Drawings Please Visit: hftp://www.imbriumsystems.com/technical-specifications Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report—Page 2 of 2 Appendix C Storm Sewer Analysis Results Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3138 Plan YD 3 12 Y p11 0 11 a Outfall 1 P CB 7 DMH 1 YD 1 Q4 a 2 10 a 7 CB 6 P 6 CB 5 PF 5 CB 4 3 C pF DMH 2 P3 TC-900 9 a CB 8 Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:12 Date:9/6/2016 Storm Sewers v10.50 Storm Sewer Tabulation Pagel Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vol Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Elev Line ID coeff (1) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (inlhr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 30.821 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 9.5 4.9 8.31 9.46 5.88 18 0.81 24.00 24.25 25.12 25.37 25.52 32.17 P1 2 1 125.478 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 9.4 4.9 8.36 9.84 12.36 12 6.50 29.17 37.33 29.88 38.32 32.17 42.38 P2 3 2 98.000 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 9.2 5.0 8.41 9.03 11.07 12 5.48 37.43 42.80 38.32 43.79 42.38 45.64 P3 4 3 7.000 0.35 2.87 0.66 0.23 1.70 8.0 9.2 5.0 8.41 8.99 11.08 12 5.43 42.90 43.28 43.79 44.27 45.64 48.90 P4 5 4 69.175 0.18 1.03 0.71 0.13 0.53 8.0 8.8 5.0 2.67 2.74 3.98 12 0.51 43.81 44.16 44.61 44.95 48.90 49.10 P5 6 5 67.325 0.19 0.85 0.64 0.12 0.40 8.0 8.5 5.1 2.05 6.26 3.53 12 2.63 44.26 46.03 45.08 46.64 49.10 49.40 P6 7 6 53.854 0.39 0.66 0.49 0.19 0.28 8.0 8.2 5.2 1.45 2.73 3.53 12 0.50 46.13 46.40 46.65 46.92 49.40 49.40 P7 8 7 37.852 0.27 0.27 0.33 0.09 0.09 8.0 8.0 5.2 0.46 1.85 2.69 8 2.01 46.67 47.43 47.01 47.75 49.40 50.10 P8 9 4 114.503 0.97 0.97 0.57 0.55 0.55 8.0 8.0 5.2 2.88 4.56 5.42 12 1.40 45.90 47.50 46.48 48.23 48.90 50.50 P12 10 4 124.668 0.20 0.52 0.83 0.17 0.38 6.0 8.6 5.1 1.95 2.72 3.25 12 0.50 43.38 44.00 44.27 44.62 48.90 47.00 P9 11 10 63.971 0.06 0.32 0.90 0.05 0.22 6.0 8.3 5.1 1.12 1.95 4.54 8 2.22 44.33 45.75 44.73 46.25 47.00 49.90 P10 12 11 73.808 0.26 0.26 0.63 0.16 0.16 8.0 8.0 5.2 0.85 1.85 3.70 8 2.01 45.85 47.33 46.25 47.77 49.90 50.00 P11 Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:12 Run Date: 9/6/2016 NOTES:Intensity=54.74/(Inlet time+10.80)^0.80; Return period=Yrs.10 c=cir e=ellip b=box , Storm Sewers 00.50 Inlet Report Page 1 Line Inlet ID Q= Q Q Q Junc Curb Inlet Grate Inlet Gutter Inlet Byp No CIA carry capt Byp Type Line' Ht L Area L W So W Sw Sx n Depth Spread Depth Spread Depr No (cfs) WS) (S) Ws) (in) (ft) (sgft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (Nft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) 1 DMH 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 2 DMH 2 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 3 STC-900 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 12.00 0.030 0.030 0.011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 4 CB 3 1.20 0.00 1.20 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 1.35 2.31 Sag 12.00 0.030 0.030 0.011 0.18 6.16 0.27 6.16 1.0 5 CB 4 0.67 0.00 0.67 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.024 0.024 0.013 0.14 5.93 0.23 5.93 1.0 Off 6 CB 5 0.63 0.00 0.63 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.038 0.038 0.013 0.15 3.89 0.23 3.89 1.0 Off 7 CB 6 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.036 0.036 0.013 0.19 5.23 0.27 5.23 1.0 ff 8 YD 1 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 Grate 0.0 0.00 1.76 1.55 2.00 Sag 12.00 0.092 0.092 0.013 0.18 2.00 0.27 2.00 1.0 9 CB 8 2.88 0.00 2.88 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.026 0.026 0.013 0.35 13.48 0.43 13.48 1.0 Off 10 CB 7 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.040 0.040 0.013 0.19 4.65 0.27 4.65 1.0 11 YD 2 0.31 0.00 0.24 0.06 Grate 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 3.028 12.00 0.028 0.028 0.013 0.08 2.90 0.13 1.61 1.0 Off 12 YD 3 0.85 0.00 0.76 0.10 Grate 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.046 12.00 0.240 0.240 0.013 0.24 1.00 0.19 0.45 1.0 Off Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:12 Run Date: 9/6/2016 NOTES: Inlet N-Values=0.016;Intensity=54.74/(Inlet time+10.80)^0.80; Return period=10 Yrs.; 'Indicates Known Q added. All curb inlets are throat. Stour,Sewers 00.f • 1 • Appendix D Catchbasin Watershed Delineation Map Soil Map—State of Connecticut (South Windsor Star Center) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOi) 1A Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. F7 Area of Interest(AOI) � StonySot p Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Solis Very Stony Spot ® Soil Map Unit Polygons Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line Soil Map Unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Other Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. � *� Special Point Features Water Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map V Blowout measurements. _. Streams and Canals IN Borrow Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoiisurvey.nres.usda.gov Clay Spot ++4 Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Closed Depression ti Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravel Pit N US Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate 0 Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. �i A. Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of g the version date(s)listed below. Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: State of Connecticut , i Mine or Quarry Survey Area Data: Version 14,Sep 22,2015 0 Miscellaneous water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 Perennial Water or larger. Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 28,2011—Apr 18, 2011 Saline Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were 0.4 Sandy Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Severely Eroded Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot LispA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—State of Connecticut South Windsor Star Center Map Unit Legend State of Connecticut(CT600) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent ofAO1 29A Agawam fine sandy loam,0 to 3 1.7 17.5% percent slopes 36A Windsor loamy sand,0 to 3 2.8 29.0% percent slopes 102 Pootatuck fine sandy loam 0.8 8.5% 108 Saco silt loam 4.3 45.0% Totals for Area of Interest 9.7 100.0% USDk Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 ' z nano-LL� r N/F - - �� - NOTES: COUR/E C. d AM E. BA/LEY \ (-VOL. 24e9 PG. 69) 1. USDA MAPPING INDICATES THAT THE SOILS WITHIN aa�PNL :W \ THE WATERSHED AREA CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING SOIL a Noo' TYPES: °° W, SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY LINE ACO SILT LOAM HSGma`s (TYPICAL) B/D / WINDSOR LOAMY SAND, 0-3% SLOPES HSG A r N/F \ / AGAWAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 0-3% SLOPES, HSG B tl� as PAUL R. !'JUD/TN,1'1. W TELL/ER �1-?L. 126 PG'127) _ MAP REFERENCE: I, / EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN 0 H ®_ - NS INF ON SHO N THIS PLAN s 1 1\ TAKEN NFROM PROPERTY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR PAUL R. N �e & JUDITH TELLIER, 2045 JOHN FITCH BLVD. SOUTH WINDSOR, S CONNECTICUT PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 4BY 0 dl O sF SF ° DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. ATE / /4 SCALE 1 =40 - LS I 12 23 1 ' 'PROPOSED BUILDING _ CATCHMENT DRAINAGE AREA i _€ p� g . - -- - 24,810 SF TOTAL 8YYg9 SF \yam 18,000 SF 1ST FLOOR _ H B y- - SF 2ND FLOOR _ - $ 3 °b - v° BASH DETALS i 810 FF: 51.00 8 I} - YD-Z \A TOTAL AREA-0.27 ACRES 3 HSG: A � ` 36A ggg ez € I COVER �i �61Es CRASS HSC A:0.03 ACRES Y ✓ YD-1 CRASS HSC B:0.19 ACRES ' \ ROOF AREA:0.05 ACRES ° 0 � / C-023 v o sv' J' ' ga YD- ( Tc-8 MINUTES o y m % _ TOTAL AREA-0.06 ACRES LL «r v F C B-7 N COVER ® LL0. e ` YD 2 IMPERVIOUS:0.01 ACRES a c - ROOF AREA:0.05 ACRES 0 3 sF A p QT C 0.90 - wC ~N °n TOTAL AREA 0.26 ACRES s' E Tc-6 MINUTES fi � ®qq COVER n `F 613 G \ CRASS HSC 4 ACRES - /�^ YD-3 CRASS HSG B:0.06 ACRES C B-4 ' - ROOF AREA.0.16 ACRES w CB 5 C-0.63 SG:. B ®. Tc 8 MINUTES O �+ O u I' TOTAL AREA-0.35 ACRES W u !II ys� \ COVER Z 1 \ CRASS HSC A:0.12 ACRES Z Z 0 C B-3 __ _ - CB-3 IMPERVIOUS:0.23 ACRES W a \ 'S � C-0.66 V 00 0 Tc-8 MINUTES u p TOTAL AREA-0.18 ACRES _ LL 3 / ? COVER _ x t CRASS HSC A:0.05 ACRES O CB-4 IMPERVIOUS:0.08 ACRES Un� ROOF AREA:0.05 ACRES N p N v ' C-0.71 3. SOIL TYPE OUND'ARY LINE Tc-a Mwures ( TOTAL AREA-0.19 ACRES COVER CRASS HSC A:0.07 ACRES (TYPICAL) CB-5 IMPERVIOUS:0.02 ACRES _ ��T.. i ROOF AREA:0.10 ACRES ' C-0.64 \ C B-8 H A ,': / TOTAL c- 8 MINUTES 0.39 ACRES z 36A COVER 1n HSG B GRASS HSC A:0.14 ACRES > CB-6 GRASS HSG B:0.09 ACRES LU IMPERVIOUS:0.16 ACRES C-0.49 \ - Tc-8 MINUTES SG:, B D \ _ TOTAL AREA -0.20 ACRES _ \. 08 \ OVER CB-7 GRASS HSC B/D:0.02 ACRES � IMPERVIOUS:0.18 ACRES g-, \ C-XX Tc-6 MINUTES S \ TOTAL AREA 0.97 ACRES � G° r COVER to Q o - GRASS HSC A:Q28 ACRES ' 018 ACRES ~ 11J m GRASS HSG B: Q Z \\ CB-8 GRAVEL DRIVE:0.10 ACRES W a N/F IMPERVIOUS:0.41 ACRES = Z JUSTIN DARCY _ (-VOL. 2102 PG. 139) C-0.57 Tc-8 MINUTES V a m Legal Description I Lot 1—2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor,CT 06074 A certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford,State of Connecticut as shown on the map referenced Subdivision & Easement Plan S.T.A.R.Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, Connecticut Prepared for Tellier Properties, LLC Date:09/06/2016 Scale 1"=30' Sheet CS-1 Sheet 3 of 15. Piece or parcel of land more particularly described and bounded as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5), said point being the southeasterly property corner of land now or formerly Courie C. &Amy E. Bailey; a Thence S13°08'17"E along the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5)a distance of ! 141.51 feet to a point; i Thence S13'08'20"E along the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5)a distance of 68.10 feet to a point being the northeasterly property corner of now or formerly Lot 2; Thence S76°51'43"W along the northerly property line of now or formerly Lot 2 a distance of 182.77 feet j to a point; Thence S13°32'28"E along the westerly property line of now or formerly Lot 2 a distance of 122.93 feet to a point being the northwesterly property corner of now or formerly Lot 3; Thence S13°32'28"E along the westerly property line of land now or formerly Lot 3 a distance of 128.61 feet to a point in the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy; Thence N89°37'35"W along the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy a distance of 74.97 feet to a concrete monument; i Thence N45°20'19"W along the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy a distance of 660.16 feet to a concrete monument being the southwesterly corner of now or formerly Parcel A; Thence N88°45'24"E along the southerly property line of now or formerly Parcel A a distance of 322.18 feet to a point being the southwesterly property corner of land now or formerly Courie C. &Amy E. Bailey; Thence N86°21'36"E along the southerly property line of land now or formerly Courie C. &Amy. E Bailey a distance of 294.45 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said parcel contains 161,338 SF or 3.704 acres. i 1 i Page 1 of 1 VOL. 1 .5 4--5 PAGE 315 STATUTORY)FORM WARRANTY DEED 10407 We,PAUL IL TELLIER and JUDITH M.TELLIER of the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford,and State of Connecticut,, For good and valuable consideration, grant to TELLIER FARM,L.L.C.of the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford,State of Connecticut and with WARRANTY COVENANT An undivided one-half interest in a certain piece or parcel of land,together with the buildings and other improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereto, located and situate partly in Town of South Windsor and partly in the Town of East Windsor, in the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,bounded and described as follows,to wit; Situated partly in the Town of South Windsor and partly in the Town of East Windsor, and bounded Northerly by land now or formerly of Edward J.Wells and land now or formerly of Lewis R. Brock,partly by each;easterly by the highway and land now or formerly of Louis R Brock and land now or formerly of George F.Bancroft,partly by each; Southerly by land now or formerly of Charles P. Hudson, land now or formerly of George F. Bancroft and by the Scantic River,partly by each; and Westerly by the Connecticut River and land now or formerly of Edward J.Wells;containing Sixty-Five (65)acres,more or less,with all the buildings thereon; Excepting from the above piece or parcel of land, the following piece or parcel of land,situated in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,bounded and describer[as follows: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of the Hartford-Springfield Highway known as Route #5,which point marks the northeast comer of land now or formerly of Charles P.Hudson,thence running westerly 540- IT, a distance of 1294.5 feet in a straight line to a merestone;thence running northerly 107'-6,a distance of 441 feet in a straight line to a merestone; thence running easterly 660-50% a distance of 432.95 fleet in a straight line to a merestone, thence running southeasterly 163° -44',a distance of 660 feet in a straight line to a merestone; thence running easterly 224'-221,a distance of 260.8 feet in a straight line to a merestone set in the westerly tine of said highway; thence running southerly along the westerly line of said highway, a distance of 275 feet to the point of beginning: bounded Northerly in a general way on other land of Abe Stroh;Easterly by the Hartford-Springfield Highway(Route#5);Southerly by lands now or formerly of Charles P.Hudson and George F.Bancroft, partly by each;land Westerly by other land of Abe Stroh. Said premises are conveyed subject to any and all provisions of any ordinance,municipal regulation or public or private law;taxes on the list of October I immediately preceding the date of this deed;and to a grant of Right-of-Way to JET LINES,INC.,dated March 29.,1972 as of record appears. Signed this r7_day of October,2003. WitmEsed by: ,,�j �c�J�• //d U��1CYCrt iAJ Paul R.Tallier sQt=til, � Judith M.Tellitx STATE OF CONNECTICUT ss: South Windsor October ,2003 COUNTY OF HARTFORD Personally Appeared Paul R.Tellier and Judith M.Tallier ' Hers of the for oinS Instrument,and acknowledged the same to be their free act and dood,before me. ;w Grantee's NlWing Address: 2003 John Fitch Boulevard John .w o k III South Windsor,CT 06074 Conftissioner of the uperior Court CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED RB IV D FOR REGOR STATE 9 LOCAL No X 12ATE o o TIME)a 4 Y' K TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WWD50R Volume: 1545 Pager It if f`�1' ' -W407 Seq: 9 ► 8 �, �87 STATUTORY FORM QUIT-CLAIM DEED WILLIAM F•. MYETTE, Of Broad Brook, Connecticut, for good and valuable consideration, grants to PAUL R. TELLIER and JUDITH M, TELLIER as JOINT-TENANTS of South Windsor, Connecticut, with QUIT-CLAIM COVENANTS: An undivided one-half interest in a certain piece or parcel, of land, together with the buildings and other improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereto, located and situate partly in Town of South Windsor and partly in the Town of East Windsor, in the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, bounded and described as follows, to wit: Situated partly in the Town of South windsor and partly in the Town of East Windsor, and bounded Northerly by land now or formerly of Edward J. Wells and land now or formerly of Lewis R, P Brock; partly by eachl easterly by the highway and land now or { formerly of Louis R. Brock and land now or formerly of George P. }#. Bancroft, partly by each; Southerly by land now or formerly of j Charles P. Hudson, land now or formerly of George F. Bancroft and by i the Scantic River, partly'by each; and Westerly by the Connecticut River and land now or formerly of Edward J. Wells; containing Sixty-five (65) acres, more or less, with all the buildings thereon; Excepting from the above piece or parcel of land, the following piece or parcel of land, situated in the Town of. South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of, the Hartford-Springfield Highway known as Route #5, which point marks the northeast corner of land now or formerly of Charles P. Hudson; thence running westerly S4°-18', a distance of 1294.5 feet in a straight line to a merestone; thence running northerly 107°-61, a distance of 441 _feet in a straight line to a merestone; thence running easterly 66°-501, a distance of 432.95 feet in a straight line to a merestone, thence running southeasterly 163°-441, a distance of 660 feet in a straight line to a merestone; thence running easterly 2240-221, a distance of 260.E feet in a straight line to a merestone set in the westerly line of said highway; thence running southerly along the westerly line of said highway, a distance of 275 feet to the point of I beginning: bounded Northerly in a general way on other land of Abe a Stroh; Easterly by the Hartford-Springfield Highway (Route #5); Southerly by lands now or formerly of Charles P. Hudson and George F. Bancroft, partly by each; land Westerly by other land of Abe. Stroh. Said premises are conveyed subject to any and all provisions of any ordinance, municipal regulation or public or private law; taxes on the list of October 1 immediately preceding the date of this deed; ' and to a grant of Right-of-Way to JET LINES, INC. dated March 29, 1972 as of record appears. I signed this ` j day of June , 1985. nes L4 Q ) / WILLIAM F. MX E ah . "No MTSKColectod Town.Ck*of East WlndW- ;VM IZ8 PA 1ST STATE or CONNECTICUTs so.. Hartford June 11 , 1985 'COUNTY OF RARTFORD Personally appeared- William F. Myette, as aforesaid, signer.,. of the foregoing instrument, and ack 1 the m to be his free act and deed, before me. 'Co i4 o r a �WSP-, ior Court • Not•a�y'L+bi�.•r Grantees' Mailing Address: An executed counterpart of this-document is being filed contemporaneously in the South Windsor Town Clerk's office. . Page 2 Statuory Form.Quit-Claim `Deed from.William P. Myette to Paul R..Tellier and Judith M. Tellier Resat ed tai Recant At me � 1 � '• A OWN �: t (' Page 1 of 2 �..... ._. ....... . w......................{a................... .... . ..... .......... "9 V 00536 WARRANTER DEED Isurnronh,p) Na11433 Q84V*T0d14PIslank&"ka,Nartfad.OpmI To all People to whom these Presents shall come,Greetk4 � KNOW M THAT I, Jennie A. Myette, of the Town of South Windsor, ' County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, for the considerstion of Ten (10) Dollars and other valuable oonsiderstions received to' MY full saWaetion of Judith It. Myette and Paul R.. I 1 Tnllisr, of said Town, County and State, i do give,grant, bargain,sell and confirm unto the said Judith H. Myetts and Paul R. Tellier and the survivor of them,and the heirs and assigns of the survivor of them forever a eortalt piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor, County i of Hartford and State of Connecticut, on the westerly aide of V.S. Route #5 and more particularly described on a certain map or plan F entitled " Property of Paul Tallier and Judith R. Myette Route 5 i I South Windsor Scale 1" = 1001 April 1967 William J. Carrington ' Reg. L. S. " which map or plan is on file in the office of Town Clerk + in asid Town of south Windsor for reference thereto. { Said premises are bounded) NORTHERLY by other land of the Grantor herein, in all, four hundred sixteen and 23/106 (416.23) feet; EASTERLY by V.S. Route #5, two hundred (200) feet; SOUTHERLY by other land of the Grantor herein, three hundred (300) feat; and i WESTERLY by other land of the Grantor herein, three hundred sixteen and 23/100 (316.23) feet. Being a portion of the same premises conveyed to the Grantor L herein in a certain Quit-Claim Deed from Julia Cavalari dated April 2, 1963 and recorded in the South Windsor Land Records in Vol. 95, at ' page 531. i The Grantor herein reserves for herself and her husband, William i A. Myetto and their heirs and assigns, the use of a right-of-way situated on the westerly portion of the above described premises, to other land of the Grantor herein. The Grantor herein also reserves for herself,and her husband, William A. Myatt*, the use of a tobacco shed situated on the above - described promises, for the remainder of the their natural lives. I� I A. Page 21of 2 ■ vol TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises,with the sp.' purtenances thereof,unto them the said grantees and the survivor of them,and the heirs and assigns of the survivor of them forever,and to their own proper use and behoof. And also I the said grantor do for myself, my heirs,executors, administrators,and assigns covenant with the said ggrrantees,their survivor and such sur. vivoes heirs and assigns,that at and until the ansealI g of these presents, T an well seized of the premises,as a good indefeasible estate.in FEE SIMPLE; and a good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written;and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as is above written. i AND FURTHERMORE, I the said grantor do by these presents bind mY eel f and my heirs and assigns forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to them the said grantees and to the survivor of them and to such survivor's heirs and assigns,against all claims and demands whatsoever,except as is above written. In Witness Whereof, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of April 196 7 I Signed Seated and deliveredin the presence of q.e07al;� ennie A. `myette P ickli�fi ........... ............... ................... . ........................«.......................,,...»................ . ., ..,..,..».. . . .,. .�L.S.] .............»....................... .............»....... :,.......,.. STATE OF CONNECTICUT f SL South Windsor, April 28, 1967 COUNTY OF Hartford j On this �7th day of ,April , 196 7,before me Charles X. gAois ,,,, ,, „ • ,the undersigned officer, personalty I appeased . J9nni.e A. mystto known i to me(of satisfactorily proven) to be the person whose name islam subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge!that Wshe ddugt executed the same for the purposes therein contained In Witness Whereof 1 hereunto set my hand lGcial seal.`//�]/�My Co .mas Expires 4/`1/7o �l Ht2o Nolary Public--Bumawsmiovttarrn fi�fnr SJI�lI�3K*,b7r7CAc ! - • STATE OF CONNECTICUT }as. f COUNTY OF J On this day of . . ............ .,. 196 ,before me . , .. ,the undersigned officer, personally i appeared ..,. . ............. .. ».. who acknowledged I hin,self/hessoif to be the...... ..... .. ...... of ,.•,»..... . ,a corporation,and that he ,as such being authorized so to do,executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein corstained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as.............. .. »...,,.», . I In Witness Whereof I hereunto set my hand and official seal. Grantee's Address 1 •' NoraryPubllc--Commissioner of the Street and Number Superior Court E City Slate I Received May 15, t46Z.Ar,�RtQ�tA� Recorded in.. Scyth Windsor land Records-•Vol 119 P"�sdr't: H¢EeI„?.van Bioklin......... Iowa Clerk ..... �I V J Yi Y 6 o III a filCAPITAL STUDIO m J O arc IvAI n F7 eeClHAMWI17,W. I fi6u3H_l4 fu NO—.11 t ! t'S fI .2 : I IIII I i I �. i I I , Nit I I I I I I I I I I I (lli I I I I I I I ��. ll! �I I ;I , II� I11IliiIll II i t III II ':IIII i I I I III I. wavNuc�K - I � , yII I IIIII i i ILI •�. xNoxs s�+mcF _ ryy Y�' I r I I 1 I I I I I I ' I .I I j I I�� illl `'I IIII I '�' `� — '--- ---- ---, --plarxaeunox--------- --- 1 ----------- -----� -x— - I''I �I ( ' ll'll il, IIII ii Il,il 1{— ___ -- __ __ rII I I II ,I I IIII ) II III I I +'III I II II i III Ijj I 5 0 U T H ELEVATION LI•.III!I'III'Ili i1� Ili'I�; A-2A SCALE:3/32":I'-0' Ji ,I I I 11I) III II IIIII rli IIi I:. III II I i 1 I I)1 1 I,,Ia III! III i�i I IiI,I ii III IIi IIIII i IIII I (I I I I i l IiI I+III I I I I I.i' l l i III IIII I�,+ I) � II III�II IIII i IIfII I IIIII�I I I' Ihl(;III 'i I I ,'I1( Y� I VII i 1 "1I I I 11 QIII oII( oIII €°� II' I IIIIII II 11 n I I I II II IIII �: II f I II rNa v , AL 9 _` I I I i IIII IiI III II I I lljl A 11 �I IiI I li IIII I (',IIII Ij' II I° II III sIL II III I i I p {yI�{ I IIII• II it II' s — — ------------_----- __ � Ili i I :Ih III II II I'll ,I I.i li III I, IIIII IIIII I EAST ELEVATION II II ,I III ; IIII!) I,I I i+I iijl lIl d A-2�Q SCALE:3/32"=I'-0' II I u I I f I I III date 112/Ib drawn scale A5 NOTED f x checked projed no. 13-43 fi I Y% 0 F r u a i ..,..lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111181111111111111111111111111111111 - 1 z 1 ------------------- I, ��1,�l���I��>��►�1�� ������ ���������,,,1,�,��1��►��IcI���E I! ��1�� �� � ����i��►�I � � I7 ��i ll�( ����►�� ��� ����1 � ����ili��1��Ii� ►I IC�II.�N� 1 �II��IIN�II�G�111�11�11�1►�b � J.;� ! �Ni ep■ If ��Ni Y LnotB9�q�6g aPACO1 Jim f 9B ,O*N Sfq -0 07 O > x FSIOUM ?d&U&Ot a * w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE ® SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 l�OSOR-Co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 Certified #70142120000332144174 September 22, 2016 Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 22 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Appl. #16-51 P—STAR Center, 2075 John Fitch Blvd Dear Mr. DeMallie: At the September 21, 2016 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission \ approved Appl.#16-51 P—South Windsor Star Center—2075 John Fitch Blvd—IWA/Conservation Commission application for the construction of a 24,000 sq ft building, parking, sidewalks, stormwater structures and associated utilities. The site is located westerly side of John Fitch Blvd., A20/Rte 5 North Overlay Zone, with following conditions: 1. The final approved copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon must be submitted to the Planning Department. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning & Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability, which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on September 21, 2021. It is the landowners)/applicant(s) responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 4. Bonds shall be collected in the amount of$20,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, $25,000 for installation of stormwater structures and $10,000 for slope plantings and stabilization plantings. 5. Plans shall be developed for removal and stabilization of the slope on the west side where there has been the depositing of, primarily, woody debris. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Town Environmental Planner. 6. Catch basins shall be provided with trap hoods. 7. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 8. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/CONSERVATION COMMISSION Elizabeth Warren, Chairperson EW/dt cc: Director of Planning Chief Building Official SOy'N S f4< '.. O x V / 0v� 074Cs1Vam V&ul&�t G a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�Osoi-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL#7011 1570 0000 6337 2201 September 8,2016 - Joanne Slater, CCTC, Town Clerk Town of East Windsor 11 Rye Street Broad Brook, CT 06016 Dear Ms. Slater: Re: Notice to Adjoining Municipalities In accordance with Connecticut General Statutes concerning notification to municipalities regarding Planning & Zoning Commission applications that could affect the abutting town, we hereby notify you of the Application 16-51P, Tellier Properties LLC, S.T.A.R. Center request for a three lot subdivision of 4.9 acres to create one new lot; request for Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 and Site Plan of Development for a 24,810 sf recreational facility on Lot#3, on property located at 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard (westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor Town Line), A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay Zone. This application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the Planning & Zoning Commission on October 25,2016 in the Council Chambers of the Town Hall. If you have any question,please feel free to contact the Planning Department at 860-644- 2511, ext. 253. Very truly yo s, Michele R. Lipe,AICP Director of Planning MRL/llz P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:8onalsi .8757 c.com vwvw.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/ PLANNERS/ SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island • • • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Lauren Zarambo Date: 9Rl2016 DPI Project No. 3300 Re: IWA&PZC Applications S.T.A.R Center • 2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor,CT WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: • ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • • • • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 9/7/16 3300 Copy of abutter list 1 9/7/16 3300 Copy of abutter letter 1 9/7/16 3300 Copy of certificates of mailing : • These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval : ® For your use ❑ Make corrections ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Forbids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: s • RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2016 SWT{WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. SIGNED: CC: L&A Cenci, Executive Assistant P.O. BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.875 7 www.designprofessionals!nc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, * Rhode 15/and • : DIRECT ABUTTER LIST : S.T.A.R.Center DPI Project No.:3300 September 6,2016 • Parcel ID Site Address Owner Name Mailing Address Mailing City Mailing Mailing • State Zip • 44702085 2085 John Fitch Bailey,Courie&Amy E 2085 John Fitch South Windsor CT 06074 : Boulevard Boulevard 47702039 2039 John Fitch Darcy,Justin 65 Ludlow Road Windsor CT 06095 Boulevard • • • • • • • • • • • • • : G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Applications\3300 Abutters list.doc P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH 1MNDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.87S7 www.designprofessionatsinc.com, CIVIL &TRAFFIC ENGINEERS I PLANNERS/ SURVEYORS I GIS ANALYSTS/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connectrc"t, Maasach"setts, t Rhode Island • September 6,2016 • Re: S.T.A.R.Center Inland Wetlands&Watercourses/Planning&Zoning Applications • 2075 John Fitch Boulevard Dear Abutting Property Owner: in accordance with Section 7.3b of the"Town of South Windsor Inland Wetlands,Watercourses,and Conservation Regulations",we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission.The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. e As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments,however,you are not required to attend.You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire.For further information regarding the specific date this will heard please contact Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer,Planning Department,860-644-2511,ext.229. Furthermore,in accordance with the Rules&Regulations of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission,you are hereby notified that an application has been filed on the property located at 595 Nutmeg Road North,abutting your property,and is subject to a hearing by the Planning&Zoning Commission.The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. : As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and/or give comments,however, you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the t meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact Michele Lipe,AICP,Town Planner,at the South Windsor Planning Department at 860-644-2511,ext.252. If you have any questions regarding the specifics of the plans,please feel free to contact our office at 860-291-8755. • Thank you. : Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC. BenJamin Pheeler,PLA Director of Operations Cc: Town of South Windsor Client • G:1Jobs13300\Doa\Appllcations\3300 2016-09-06 Abutter Notice.doc d Address of Sender Check type of mail or service: Affix Stamp Here (if issued as a 2 Certified Recorded Delivery(International) certificate of mailing, COD Registered or for additional Delivery Confirmation Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) Express Mail Signature Confirmation Postmark and Insured Article Number Addressee(Nan Le,Street,City,State,&ZIP Code) Postac D RR U,% PRSTAGE :e Fee Justin Darcy SOpU11WINDSOR, CT 65 Ludlow Road SE060 4 NT Windsor, CT 06095 11.30 Courie &Amy E. Bailey 1000 06074 R 1 8088-1 2 \ ©� 2085 John Fitch Boulevard p South Windsor, CT 06074 a _ — , :r U, . Po STAGE SOppMW INDSOR, CT 3 8074 SEP�70,AU1NT $1 .30 100d 08095 R2304N118088-12 - - O iCO ' t usSpS i ber of Pieces Total Number of Pieces Postmaster Per(Name of receiving employee) lender Received at Post Office ��� See Privacy Act Statement on Reverse 3877,February 2002(Page 1 of 2) Complete by Typewriter,Ink,or Bali Point Pen `(0 . 5-) P P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serwng Connecticut, Maesachusetts, * Rhode Island • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Michele Li e p Date: 9/9/2016 DPI Project No. 3300 Town of South Windsor Re: S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard • WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Renderings g El Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • • • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 15 Updated Wetland Report by Highland Soils, LLC 13 Site Traffic Evaluation Study by Bubaris Traffic Associates These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ No exceptions taken El Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections • El Submit copies for distribution • ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit � ❑ Return corrected prints • ® For review and comment ❑ Forbids due El Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: • [REC- --®0 9 2016R PLANNING DEPT. : • SIGNED: CC: Ben in P.Wheeler, PLA 1 B u ba ri s Traffic James G.Bubaris P.E. S S O C A T E S Principal Planning* Engineering* September 6, 2016 Mr. William Tellier, Owner Tellier Properties, LLC j 2045 John Fitch Boulevard , South Windsor, CT 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR P1 aNPNNC SFr.-rj f Re: Site Traffic Evaluation Study 2 - Proposed S.T.A.R. Recreation Center John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mr. Tellier: Reference is made to the proposal to develop a recreation center on the parcel of land located on the west side of John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) at no. 2045 opposite Crow Park Road, which is also known as Scantic Road (in abutting East Windsor which this road serves), in the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut. Introduction Please refer to Exhibit 1 of the Appendix which contains two maps locating this site with respect to the surrounding roadway network, with John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) running north-south, and Crow Park Road intersecting the west side of Route 5 at a signalized intersection directly opposite the proposed full access / egress Site Drive for this development to be located on the west side of Route 5. Plans are to signalize the proposed Site Drive to create the new fourth leg of this signalized intersection. Please refer to Exhibit 2 of the Appendix which shows the proposed site plan for this development which will maintain the second and third residential parcels at the southern end of this property. The subject facility will provide indoor practice areas on a membership basis for various sports teams located within the immediate surrounding areas. Hours of operation will be on a daily basis with Monday through Thursday from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, and Friday through Sunday from 7:00 am to 12:00 midnight. The facility will provide comprehensive athletic activities including exercise and weight rooms. The building will provide about 24,810 square feet of building area and be served by 100 parking spaces (includes 4 handicap parking spaces and an area of 7 reserve spaces). 1 1 PO Box 4250• Yalesville,CT 06492• Phone:203-265-8086 . Cell:203-606-4742 •JimBubaris@hotmail.com • 2 ' Background Conditions ' Given the nature of this development and the manner in which it interfaces with the surrounding roadway network, the selected study area for the subject , development consists of the proposed site drive intersection on John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) as follows and as shown in Exhibits 1 and 2 of the Appendix: ' • U.S. Route 5 (John Fitch Boulevard) at Proposed Site Drive and Crow Park Road: This is a 3-way, signalized intersection with Route 5 running north- ' south, and Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) as the east leg. The new Site Drive will become the west leg of this intersection to form a 4-way, signalized intersection. The Route 5 northbound approach is two ' lanes wide, with what will be one combination left/through lane and one combination through/right lane. The Route 5 southbound approach is two lanes wide, with one combination left/through lane and what will be one , combination through/right lane. The Crow Park Road westbound approach will remain as one-lane wide and will accommodate a combination of left/through/right movements. The new Site Drive eastbound approach will have one lane to accommodate a combination of left/through/right movements. In addition the new Site Drive will have one lane for all inbound traffic. The traffic signal at this location is a simple two-phase signal with no , advance turn features and is part of the closed loop interconnected system along Route 5 to the north and south of this location. Plans are to signalize ' the new Site Drive as well and to have the outbound movements move concurrently with the existing side-street phase which controls the Crow Park Road westbound approach. ' Background Traffic Volumes For the purposes of establishing background traffic volumes for the subject study ' area, manual turning movement counts were conducted in 2015 at the intersection of Route 5 at Crow Park Road during the typical peak periods ' evaluated for a use such as the subject recreation center. These periods included from 7 to 9 am on a typical weekday morning peak period, from 4 to 6 pm on a typical weekday evening peak period, and from 11 am to 1 pm on a , typical Saturday midday peak period. Please refer to Exhibits 3 through 5 of the Appendix which graphically summarize the 2015 existing weekday am, weekday pm, and Saturday midday peak traffic volumes that were obtained from the aforementioned traffic counting exercises. ' Please refer to Exhibits 6 through 8 of the Appendix which graphically summarize the 2017 background (no-build) weekday am, weekday pm, and ' Saturday midday peak traffic volumes that can be expected next year when the subject development is expected to be operational, but without the subject facility in place. ' 3 ' The background (no-build) volumes in Exhibits 6 through 8 were derived by expanding the existing volumes from Exhibits 3 through 5 by a factor of 1.04 to incorporate the typically accepted traffic growth rate of 2 percent per year for ' each of two years since the traffic count measurements were conducted. Site-Generated Traffic Volumes and Distributions ' For the purpose of estimating site-generated traffic volumes fo r the subject recreation center, we applied the trip generation equations from ITE's (Institute of ' Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual to estimate the amount of site traffic to be generated and distributed. Please refer to Exhibit 9 of the Appendix which summarizes the trip generation calculations that were conducted for the subject facility utilizing ITE's Land Use Code No. 493 for athletic clubs similar to the subject development proposal. A review of Exhibit 9 in the Appendix ind icates dicates the trip generation estimates for the proposed 24,810 square foot recreation center as summarized in Table 1 on the next page of this study. A review of Table 1 shows that the subject recreation center can be expected to generate from 74 to 165 trips per hour during the three study peak hours, where a trip is defined as a vehicular movement traveling either to or from the subject facility. For the purpose of distributing the estimated site-generated traffic on the ' surrounding roadway system, the following scenario has been assumed based on the distribution of the relative background traffic volumes carried by each of the surrounding street approaches: ' 45 percent to and from the north via Route 5 45 percent to and from the south via Route 5 10 percent to and from the east via Crow Park Road (Scantic Road) Please refer to Exhibits 10 through 12 of the Appendix for graphical ' representations of the site-generated traffic volume estimates associated with the subject development, distributed on the surrounding roadway as estimated above, for each of the three assumed peak study periods. ' Operations Analysis ' 2015 existing weekday am, weekday pm, and Saturday midday peak hour analyses are based on the peak hour traffic volumes shown'as Exhibits 3 through 5 of the Appendix. 2017 background (no-build) weekday am, weekday pm, and Saturday midday peak hour analyses, without the subject development, are based on the peak hour traffic volumes shown as Exhibits 6 through 8 of the Appendix. Table 1 ' Trip Generation Estimates , Proposed S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) , South Windsor, Connecticut Weekday AM Peak Hour Inbound 45 Outbound 29 ' Total 74 Weekday PM Peak Hour Inbound 93 ' Outbound 55 Total 148 ' Saturday Mid-day Peak Hour Inbound 81 ' Outbound 84 Total 165 Bubaris Traffic Associates ' September 2016 ' 4 ' 2017 combined (build) weekday am, weekday pm, and Saturday midday peak hour analyses, representing conditions when the proposed development is expected to be open for use, are based on the peak hour traffic volumes shown ' as Exhibits 13 through 15 of the Appendix. Exhibits 13 through 15 were developed by combining the background no-build ' traffic volumes from Exhibits 6 through 8 with the estimated site-generated traffic volumes from Exhibits 10 through 12. ' Intersection operational analyses were performed for the defined study intersections utilizing the methodology described in the latest edition of Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985, ' updated to 2012. Application of this methodology was facilitated by use of Synchro Analysis Software, developed by the Trafficware Corporation, Version 9, 2015. Operational analyses are utilized to determine a Level of Service (LOS) for ' a given intersection operating under either signalized or unsignalized control. In the case of signalized intersections similar to the proposed Site Drive signalized intersection, Level of Service (LOS) is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, increased fuel ' consumption, and lost of travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is comprised of a number of factors that relate to control, geometric, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually ' experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. ' Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle, typically for a 15-minute analysis period. Delay is a ' complex measure and depends on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the green ratio, and the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for the lane group. In the case of signalized intersections, the Level of ' Service for each approach is computed, and an overall Level of Service for the entire intersection is determined. In today's environment, Levels of Service C to D are considered acceptable, and Levels of Service A to B are seldom achieved ' at signalized intersections. Please refer to Exhibit 16 in the Appendix, which provides details on the ' definitions of Levels of Service for signalized intersections. The results of the operational analyses, which compare 2015 existing, 2017 ' background (no-build) and 2017 combined (build) conditions, are summarized in Table 2 on the next page of this study. 1 Table 2 Summary of.Traffic Operations.Analyses Levels of Service Proposed S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) South Windsor, Connecticut 2015 Existing 2017 Background 2017 Combined AM Peak PM Peak SAT Peak AM Peak PM Peak SAT Peak AM Peak PM Peak SAT Peak John Fitch Boulevard Route 5 at Pro osed North Drive and Crow Park Road John Fitch Boulevard northbound approach A A A A A A A A A John Fitch Boulevard southbound approach A A A A A A A. A A North Drive eastbound approach C C C C C C B C C Crow Park Road westbound approach D C D D C D D C D -Overall- -B- -A- -A- -B- -A- -A- -B- -A-- Average Delay(seconds) 12.9 7.3 7.0 13.4 7.6 7.3 13.8 8.6 8.5 Bubaris Traffic Associates September 2016 5 ' The computer-generated worksheets for these operational analyses are included as Exhibits 17 through 25 of the Appendix as follows: • Exhibit 17— 2015 Existing AM Peak • Exhibit 18 —2015 Existing PM Peak • Exhibit 19 —2015 Existing Saturday Peak • Exhibit 20 —2017 Background AM Peak • Exhibit 21 — 2017 Background PM Peak • Exhibit 22 —2017 Background Saturday Peak • Exhibit 23 — 2017 Combined AM Peak ' • Exhibit 24 —2017 Combined PM Peak • Exhibit 25 —2017 Combined Saturday Peak A review of Table 2 shows that levels of service in the year 2017 when the subject recreational facility is expected to be in place will remain at virtually the same satisfactory levels as would otherwise exist without this development. ' The signalized intersection of Route 5 at Crow Park Road and the proposed Site Drive will remain at overall level of service B (considered very good) during the ' weekday am peak, and overall level of service A (considered excellent) during the weekday pm peak and the Saturday midday peak. ' Therefore, the proposed recreational development will not have an adverse impact on traffic operations that would otherwise exist within the defined study area without the subject development. ' Traffic Crash Experience ' A review was made of recent available three-year traffic crash experience summary for the subject study area as compiled by the Connecticut Department of Transportation for the three-year period which included 2011 through 2013. ' Please refer to Table 3 on the next page of this study which summarizes the traffic crash data contained in Exhibit 26 of the Appendix for the subject study area and experience period. ' A review of Table 3 shows a veryfavorable traffic crash experience p fence for the intersection of Route 5 at Crow Park Road, with no recurring problems requiring ' correction, or that may be exacerbated by the proposed development, in that no type of crash or particular crash pattern has occurred more frequently than five times in any given year. Table 3 Summary of Traffic Crash Experience 3 Years, 2011 through.2013 Proposed S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Study Area South Windsor, Connecticut John Fitch Boulevard(Route 5)at Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) Rear End Crashes Right Angle Crashes Head-On Crashes Fixed Obiect NB/NB SB/SB EB/EB WB/WB Total EB/NB EB/SB WB/NB WB/SB Total NB/SB EB/WB Total NB GRANQ SB EB WB Total TOTAL s s 14 1 1 0 0 1.5. Totals: s a 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Bubaris Traffic Associates September 2016 IIIIIIII� IIIIIIII� IIIIIIII� IIIIII� IIIIIIII� I� ' 6 Recommended Improvements With the addition of the proposed Site Drive on the west side of Route 5 opposite the Crow Park Road approach which will convert the subject signalized intersection into a 4-way intersection, the traffic signal at this intersection, at a minimum, will need to be revised to provide two vehicular signal heads facing the new site drive and vehicular detection provisions on the proposed Site Drive eastbound approach. Upon approval of this development by the Town of South Windsor, a determination will be made as to what the Connecticut Department of ' Transportation will require for the impacted traffic signal. ' Conclusions It is the professional opinion of Bubaris Traffic Associates that the proposed ' Indoor recreational development, to be located on the west side of John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road), should not adversely impact traffic operations on the surrounding roadway network in the year 2017 when the subject development is expected to be completed and occupied. ' This development is expected to generate from 74 to 165 vehicular trips per hour during the weekday am, weekday pm and Saturday midday peak periods under normal operation activities. Operational analyses indicate that the proposed development will essentially not alter the satisfactory levels of service that would otherwise be in place without the subject development, provided that the proposed Site Drive opposite Crow Park Road (which will convert the subject signalized intersection to a 4-way intersection) is signalized as well. ' The traffic crash experience for the subject study area is essentially satisfactory, with no recurring problems that need to be corrected, or that may be exacerbated by the proposed development. 0NN��'''% Very truly yours, Bubaris Traffic Associates 41 ' = p'• No.9203 OA' < o ' `�Q James G. Bubaris' P.E. cF F� N •• •��`` ss� SEN�`�.��' Conn. Reg. No. 9203 ' 'fi�NAtE`" ll Principal Cc: Mr. Peter DeMallie, Principal ' Mr. Benjamin P. Wheeler, P.L.A Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive ' South Windsor, CT 06074 Site Traffic Evaluation Study ' S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) South Windsor, Connecticut ' Appendix , Table of Contents Exhibit 1 Location Maps ' Exhibit 2 Site Plan , Exhibit 3 2015 Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 4 2015 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' Exhibit 5 2015 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' Exhibit 6 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 7 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' Exhibit 8 2017 Background (No-Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' Exhibit 9 Trip Generation Calculations ITE Land Use Code#493—Athletic Club ' Exhibit 10 2017 Site-Generated Weekday AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 11 2017 Site-Generated Weekday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 12 2017 Site-Generated Saturday Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 13 2017 Combined (Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibit 14 2017 Combined (Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes , Exhibit 15 2017 Combined (Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes , Exhibit 16 Definitions of Levels of Service— Signalized Intersections (continued) ' (continued) M Exhibit 17 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2015 Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Exhibit 18 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2015 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Exhibit 19 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2015 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour ' Exhibit 20 Traffic Operations Analysis nalysis Worksheets ' 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour Exhibit 21 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour Exhibit 22 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Background (No-Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour Exhibit 23 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Combined (Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour Exhibit 24 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Combined (Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour ' Exhibit 25 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Combined (Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour ' Exhibit 26 Traffic Crash Experience Data Route 5 at Scantic Road Study Area t Exhibit 1 ' Location Maps S.T.A.R. Recreation Center ' Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) South Windsor, Connecticut W5 JW FRW B1"IL GWMle fps » r ageno1 GOOcSIe 2045 John Fitch Blvd S UOICIery ?i Harken:Landscape 7 '7 Sup{dy P,Garden C.En!c: i 5 olio f�a Ihe Nutrnr.�lteslaumnl ��(�. d aanquet v,:uny s) South Mndsor 1�<< Auto Parts IC,`o �►�' Lt � 1te 20�5 John Fitch Blvd 3 I GOOS � lJ Map data©2015 Google 200 ft e. w https://www.google.com/maps/place/2045+John+Fitch+Blvd,+South+Windsor,+CT+06074/... 8/3/2015 2045 John Fitch Blvd - Goo le Maps GOOSIC 2045 John FitchBlvd Imagery ��� 4� � ��'dn7 Flanym I L�r Iiiy ��. • � � � ti '✓'�b' c' M ' 20b5'Joho-FncbBlvJi @2015 Google, . .. .@2015 Google 200 ft - - - • - - •' t • ` • Exhibit 2 ' Site Plan S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road (aka Scantic Road) South Windsor, Connecticut 1 J7 al PAM R. c PARCEL A —cIZR� " F A.A A rva. 2,;, ? AL-7 PIPELINE...... S.Y. -LL —A PROCH. "Fol �m.LOno CONBTRUCTM 18.24 810�TOTAL 7, 6."o V IST FlOOR LOT I 810 S' A, IT o o ZONING DATA BLOCK LOT Z wmsM wONRI.ayzom \ / I I" I use REQr0.11oN FhOUTY .e I IN==-Mlil I rr9m MoOPHO/ALUnaO PRovn® _lU co Is IL WX S mw Pll= iL j-'A' P—T A-- bla 1U FANG FoltmG 2 TOTAL RtOLe®• Wii o NNNNN I -7 \Tl 11 > ne Lx A. BEDROOM LOT I REF R N T. APPLICANT:SI PROPERTY OWNER N N Ell Ir I c E P —-——-—— Teffler Properties,LLC Paul R.&Judith Tellier Ms `To mr[sG 2063 John Fitch Blvd. 2063 John Fitch Blvd mvi South Windsor.CT 06074 South Windsor.CT 06074 CL-1 September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center ' Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT • o v 1 10 Site Drive o 747 4 179 Crow Park Road 1 0 41 t 0 y 0 576 39 $ITE m 0 m z fN 1 Not to Scale 0 Exhibit 3 2015 Existing Weekday AM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road , South Windsor, GT • o ,�C 24 0 860 21 F 0 Site Drive 77 Crow Park Road ■ Al I I"' ■ 0 0 699 35 SITE cc 0 CO - N Not to Soale Exhibit 4 , 2015 Existing Weekday IPM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center ' Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT m 0 oc v t 19 0 555 31 f-- 0 Site Drive 76 Crow Park Road 0 Al t r 0 --► 0 597 38 0 � SITE m m fN U- Not to Seals c z 0 Exhibit 5 2015 Existing Saturday Midday Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road ' South Windsor, CT • cc V 10 ' 0 777 4 f•- 0 Main Site Drive 190 Crow Park Road 190 o ♦ r-' 0 0 612 42 SITE M.M. 1 4P 7 fN s Not to Scale c r 0 Exhibit 6 , 2017 Background Weekday AM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center 1 Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT m o 25 0 894 22 0 ' Main Site Drive 82 Crow Park Road 0 + r 0 --► 0 742 37 0 SITE 1 co m ■ ■ m fN U. Not to Scale 0 Exhibit 7 2017 Background Weekday RM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road ' South Windsor, QT • o , oc V 20 , 0 577 33 t-- 0 $Its Drive 4 81 Crow Park Road ' 0 + r' 0 -► 0 633 41 SITE m r 0 fN m Not to 89ale c s 0 Exhibit 8 , 2017 Background Saturday Midday Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9/6/2016 (2012) Based on Average Rates ------------------------- Exhibit 9 ------------------------- SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS SOURCE:TRIP GENERATION REPORT,INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,9th Edition,2012 LAND USE:ATHLETIC CLUB,LAND USE#493 PROJECT: Proposed S.T.A.R. Center Recreation Facility ' Route 5 opposite Scantic Road South Windsor CT NUMBER OF 1,000-S SQUARE FEET AREA: 24.810 TOTAL TIME PERIOD ITE TRIP GENERATION EQUATION TRIPS INBOUND OUTBOUND AVERAGE ???? 0 0 WEEKDAY 50% INBOUND*50%OUTBOUND PEAK HOUR T=2.97(X) 74 45 29 ' 7 TO 9 AM 61 % INBOUND*39%OUTBOUND PEAK HOUR T=5.96(X) 148 93 55 4 TO 6 PM 63% INBOUND*37%OUTBOUND ' AM PEAK HOUR T=3.19(X) 79 46 33 OF GENERATOR 58% INBOUND*42%OUTBOUND PM PEAK HOUR T=5.84(X) 145 91 54 OF GENERATOR 63%INBOUND*37%OUTBOUND AVERAGE ???? 0 0 SATURDAY 50% INBOUND*50%OUTBOUND ' SATURDAY T=6.67(X) 165 81 84 PEAK HOUR 49% INBOUND*51 %OUTBOUND OF GENERATOR September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT • o aC 0 Site Drive zo 0 0 o Crow Park Road 13 ♦ 3 20 0 0 13 SITE In = 45 Out = 29 , cc m o m nN Utv Not to Scale c z 0 Exhibit 10 Site-Generated Weekday AM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center ' Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT a • 0 aC v L 0 Site Drive 42 0 0 .— 0 Crow Park Road 25 ♦ 5 42 0 0 25 � SITE in = 93 tCO Out = ss m 0 m fN r Not to Scale c z 0 Exhibit 11 Site-Generated Weekday PM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT • o 0 v t 0 ' 36 0 0 f— 9 Site ®rive 0 Crow Park Road ■ 38 Al + r"O ■ 8 36 0 0 38 SITE In = 81 Out = 84 Ca MD. m o fN 0 m .c Not to Scale 0 1 1 1 1 Exhibit 12 1 Site-Generated Saturday Midday Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes , September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT a m O v 10 Site Drive 20 74 4 f— 190 Crow Park Road 13 t + �-► 3 20 612 42 13 � r SITE m m ni 1iz Ul c Not to Scale s 0 Exhibit 13 2017 Combined Weekday AM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT a m o 'DC 25 Site Drive 42 894 22 9 82 Crow Park Road 25 *l ♦ r-' 5 42 742 37 25 SITE m m fN t Not to Scale C Z O . i Exhibit 14 , 2017 Combined Weekday PM Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes i September 2016 S.T.A.R. Recreation Center Route 5 opposite Crow Park Road South Windsor, CT • o DC 20 36 577 33 9 ' Site Drive 81 Crow Park Road 38 t r 8 36 633 41 ' 38 � SITE m ■ ■ fN 1 L Not to Scale c .c 0 Exhibit 15 2017 Combined Saturday Midday Bubaris Traffic Associates Peak Hour Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 16 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SOURCE: HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL (HCM), 2010 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD (1) Level of Service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, increased fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is comprised of a number of factors that relate to control, geometric, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle, typically for p 15-minute analysis period. Delay is a complex measure and depends on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the green ratio, and the volume-to- capacity (v/c) ratio for the lane group. In the case of signalized intersections, the Level of Service for each approach is computed, and an overall Level of Service for the entire intersection is determined. Levels of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections are defined as follows: LEVEL OF SERVICE CONTROL DELAY PER CONDITION t VEHICLE (SECONDS) LOS A < 10 LOW DELAY LOS B > 10 TO 20 SHORT DELAY LOS C > 20 TO 35 AVERAGE DELAY LOS D > 35 TO 55 CONGESTION NOTICEABLE LOS E > 55 TO 80 LIMIT OF ACCEPTABLE DELAY , LOS F > 80 UNACCEPTABLE In today's environment, Levels of Service C to D are considered acceptable, and Levels of Service A to B are seldomly achieved at signalized intersections. (1) HCNI, Exhibit 16-2. i i III I Exhibit 17 ' Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2015 Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Existing 2015 AM Peak Lane Gfoup` E&LBT = BR INBL ..WBT, ''INBR '.SNBL = NBT:= NBR SBL SBT 5BR Lane Configurations 4 41a 414 Traffic Volume vph 1 1 1 179 1 10 1 576 39 4 747 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 179 1 10 1 576 39 4 747 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.993 0.991 Fit Protected 0.984 0.955 ' Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1766 0 0 3507 0 0 3539 0 Fit Permitted 0.922 0.737 0.954 0.953 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1640 0 0 1363 0 0 3346 0 0 3373 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 1 3, 11 Link Speed(mph) - 30 30 30 45 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 1 1 1 195 1 11 1 626 42 4 812 1 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 207 0 0 669 0 0 817 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 ' Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Existing 2015 AM Peak -. Lane.Group EBL :T EBTBR WBLVT WBR NBL' NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ' Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Total Split(s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Split(%) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% Maximum Green(s) 32.1 32.1 32.1 32.1 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 ' Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? ' Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 18.1 18.1 59.7 59.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.75 0.30 0.36 Control Delay 22.0 49.4 7.5 8.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.0 49.4 7.5 8.1 LOS C D A A Approach Delay 22.0 49.4 7.5 8.1 ' Approach LOS C D A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 110 72 95 Queue Length 95th(ft) 7 168 130 167 ' Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 585 488 2224 2239 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 ' Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn A 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.42 0.30 0.36 ' Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated ' Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.9 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.9% ICU Level of Service A ' Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 ' �01 F UO2 S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report ' Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 r Exhibit 18 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets , 2015 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Winds 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 CT Existing 2015 PM PM Peak Lane Group EBT EBR s.:<WBL$ ;�WBT x; WBR NB R Lane Configurations 4* 41 41* Traffic Volume(vph) 1 1 1 77 1 24 1 699 35 21 860 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 77 1 24 1 699 35 21 860 1 ' Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.968 0.993 ' Flt Protected 0.984 0.964 0.999 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1738 0 0 3514 0 0 3536 0 Flt Permitted 0.902 0.777 0.954 0.926 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1605 0 0 1401 0 0 3353 0 0 3277 0 ' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 1 20 13 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 ' Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 1 1 1 84 1 26 1 760 38 23 935 1 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 111 0 0 799 0 0 959 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No ' Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 ' Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 ' Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 ' Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 ' Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex ' Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase - Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 ' S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5, South Windsor, CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT t 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Existing 2015 PM Peak Lane GrouR .,, E_BL -BBT ;, -EBR INBL Ij�� ,,WBRY NBL NBT` NBR° BL "" SBT sBR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 ' Total Split(s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Total Split(%) 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% Maximum Green(s) 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 41.7 41.7 41.7 41.7 ' Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 10.4 10.4 47.4 47.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.50 0.35 0.43 Control Delay 21.7 30.1 5:4 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.7 30.1 5.4 6.1 ' LOS C C A A Approach Delay 21.7 30.1 5.4 6.1 Approach LOS , C C A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 37 57 75 Queue Length 95th(ft) 7 78 105 136 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) ' Base Capacity(vph) 369 337 2276 2220 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 ' Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.33 0.35 0.43 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 ' Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.50 Intersection Signal Delay:7.3 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 4_01 R 2 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor, CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' ' Exhibit 19 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2015 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour r Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Existing 2015 SAT Peak LaneG`r'oup`, . r._ EBL EBT i.EBR =1NBL 'WJ3T WBR `'' aNBL. ' NBT N`BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 14 01 Traffic Volume(vph) 1 1 1 76 1 19 3 597 38 31 555 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 76 .1 19 3 597 38 31 555 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 , Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.973 0.991 Fit Protected 0.984 0.962 0.997 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1744 0 0 3507 0 0 3529 0 Fit Permitted 0.905 0.769 0.953 0.893 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1610 0 0 1394 0 0 3343 0 0 3161 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 1 17 11 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 1 1 1 83 1 21 3 649 41 34 603 1 Shared Lane Traffic(%) I Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 105 0 0 693 0 0 638 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 ' Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel ' Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase ' Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5 South Windsor CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Existing 2015 SAT Peak Lane.Group EgL ,EBT EBRWBI WB`f WBR NBL` h?NBT NBR SBL y,SBT SBR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Total Split(s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split(%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% Maximum Green(s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 28,1 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 ' Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 10.7 10.7 57.1 57.1 ' Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.71 0.71 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.53 0.29 0.28 Control Delay 25.3 36.2 4.7 4.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.3 36.2 4.7 4.7 LOS C D A A Approach Delay 25.3 36.2 4.7 4.7 Approach LOS C D A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 42 48 45 Queue Length 95th(ft) 8 85 89 84 ' Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 566 500 2390 2257 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.21 0.29 0.28 ' Intersection Summary - Area Type. Other Cycle Length:80 ' Actuated Cycle Length:80 Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.53 Intersection Signal Delay:7.0 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service B ' Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Existing 2015 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Exhibit 20 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets ' 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 AM Peak Lane Group - . :EBL` .. EBTr .. EBR ><WBLr� �IBT� �UVBR NBA$ NBTz` NBR SBLBT SBR Lane Configurations , 04 Traffic Volume(vph) 1 1 1 190 1 10 1 612 42 4 777 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 190 1 10 1 612 42 4 777 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.993 0.990 Flt Protected 0.984 0.955 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1766 0 0 3504 0 0 3539 0 Fit Permitted 0.923 0.736 0.954 0.953 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1642 0 0 1361 0 0 3343 0 0 3373 0 ' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 1 3 11 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 45 ' Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 81 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 1 1 1 207 1 11 1 665 46 4 845 1 ' Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 219 0 0 712 0 0 850 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 ' Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 ' Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 ' Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 ' Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA ' Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 ' Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 ' S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 AM Peak NBT' NBR SBL "SBT SBR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 ' Total Split(s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Split(%) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% Maximum Green(s) 32.1 32.1 32.1 32.1 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 ' Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 ' Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 18.9 18.9 58.9 58.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65 ' v/c Ratio 0.01 0.76 0.32 0.38 Control Delay 21.3 49.2 8.0 8.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.3 49.2 8.0 8.7 , LOS C D A A Approach Delay 21.3 49.2 8.0 8.7 Approach LOS C D A A ' Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 116 81 104 Queue Length 95th(ft) 7 175 144 181 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) ' Base Capacity(vph) 586 487 2192 2208 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 ' Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.45 0.32 0.38 Intersection Summary. Area Type. Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90 ' Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.76 , Intersection Signal Delay: 13.4 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' i Exhibit 21 ' Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 2017 Background (No-Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour r Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 PM Peak Lane'Grouph. E°BL ` , BT EBR =WBL WBT 1NBR NBL NB'f NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 41* ' Traffic Volume(vph) 1 1 1 82 1 25 1 742 37 22 894 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 82 1 25 1 742 37 22 894 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.969 0.993 Fit Protected 0.984 0.963 0.999 Said. Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1738 0 0 3514 0 0 3536 ' 0 ' Fit Permitted 0.901 0.776 0.954 0.923 Said.Flow(perm) 0 1603 0 0 1401 0 0 3353 0 0 3267 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes ' Said.Flow(RTOR) 1 20 13 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 ' Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 1 1 1 89 1 27 1 807 40 24 972 1 Shared Lane Traffic(%) I Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 117 0 0 848 0 0 997 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right ' Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane , Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 ' Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel ' Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel ' Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 ' Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 ' S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 PM Peak Lane_0000 - '.EBL. BT, .z f13R. .,.WBL , fB�T� >WBR... NBL 4 NBT NBR fi SBL = �SBT SBR ' Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Total Split(s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Total Split(%) 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% Maximum Green(s) 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 41.7 41.7 41.7 41.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 ' Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 10.5 10.5 47.3 47.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.52 0.37 0.45 Control Delay 21.3 30.6 5.7 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.3 30.6 5.7 6.4 LOS C C A A Approach Delay 21.3 30.6 5.7 6.4 ' Approach LOS C C A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 40 62 80 Queue Length 95th(ft) 7 82 115 147 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 369 337 2267 2205 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.35 0.37 0.45 ' Intersection Summary - Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 ' Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.52 Intersection Signal Delay:7.6 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min)15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 S�J1 RJ2 i ' S.T.A.R. Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor, CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Exhibit 22 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets ' 2017 Background (No-Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor CT 3. North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 SAT Peak Lane Group• . EBL EBTBRW61 zUilBTr WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* 41 41a 41a Traffic Volume(vph) 1 1 1 81 1 20 1 633 41 33 577 1 Future Volume(vph) 1 1 1 81 1 20 1 633 41 33 577 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.955 0.973 0.991 Flt Protected 0.984 0.962 0.997 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1744 0 0 3507 0 0 3529 0 Flt Permitted 0.905 0.769 0.955 0.886 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1610 - 0 0 1394 0 0 3350 0 0 3136 0 ' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 1 17 12 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12,2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 1 1 1 88 1 22 1 688 45 36 627 1 1 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 3 0 0 111 0 0 734 0 0 664 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 ' Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report ' Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Background 2017 SAT Peak Lane��oup , . EBL iEBT , EBR. =WET WBR NBL NBT` NB'R SBL SBT 5BR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 ' Total Split(s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split(%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% Maximum Green(s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 ' Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 ' Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 10.9 10.9 56.9 56.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.71 0.71 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.54 0.31 0.30 ' Control Delay 25.0 36.8 4.9 4.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.0 36.8 4.9 4.9 ' LOS C D A A Approach Delay 25.0 36.8 4.9 4.9 Approach LOS C D A A ' Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 45 53 48 Queue Length 95th(ft) 8 89 98 91 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 ' Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) 566 500 2384 2228 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 ' Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.22 0.31 0.30 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length:80 ' Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated , Maximum v/c Ratio:0.54 Intersection Signal Delay:7.3 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 ' Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 a toi(R' 1M ±i;32 ' S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Background 2017 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' Exhibit 23 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets 201.7 Combined (Build) Weekday AM Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 AM Peak Lane�Group ,. . EBL EBT -EBR = 'UUBL VVIRT WBR '. NBL CQBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41 Traffic Volume(vph) 13 3 13 190 5 10 20 612 42 4 777 20 Future Volume(vph) 13 3 13 190 5 10 20 612 42 4 777 20 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.939 0.993 0.991 0.996 Fit Protected 0.978 0.956 0.999 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1711 0 0 1768 0 0 3504 0 0 3525 0 ' Fit Permitted 0.857 0.719 0.913 0.952 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1499 0 0 1330 0 0 3202 0 0 3356 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes ' Satd.Flow(RTOR) 14 3 11 4 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 45 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 14 3 14 207 5 11 22 665 46 4 845 22 Shared Lane Traffic I ' Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 31 0 0 223 0 0 733 0 0 871 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right , Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 ' Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 ' Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel ' Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex ' Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 ' Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation Route 5 South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 AM Peak Lane Group r EBL EBT EBR ;'WBG WB�T ,WBR NBL NBT, NBR SBL SB;T SBR ' Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Total Split(s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Split(%) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% 57.8% Maximum Green(s) 32.1 32.1 32.1 32.1 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 19.5 19.5 58.3 58.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.65 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.77 0.35 0.40 Control Delay 16.9 49.1 8.6 9.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.9 49.1 8.6 9.1 LOS 13 , D A A Approach Delay 16.9 49.1 8.6 9.1 Approach LOS B D A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 8 118 87 110 Queue Length 95th(ft) 27 177 156 191 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 543 476 2077 2174 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.47 0.35 0.40 Intersection SummaryArea Type. Other Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 ' Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 01 R �2 r S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5, South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 AM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report 1 Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Exhibit 24 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets , 2017 Combined (Build) Weekday PM Peak Hour Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 PM Peak Lane<Group r., 3 ,,EBLr __ ABTr ,:EBR ,2 RLVI��TWBR - NBL t'= =NB�T NBir56Lw�SBT1 PSBR Lane Configurations 41� 4+ 41 � Traffic Volume(vph) 25 5 25 82 9 25 42 742 37 22 894 42 Future Volume(vph) 25 5 25 82 9 25 42 742 37 22 894 42 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Fr 0.938 0.971 0.993 0.993 Flt Protected 0.978 0.966 0.997 0.999 ' Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1709 0 0 1747 0 0 3504 0 0 3511 0 Flt Permitted 0.837 0.753 0.849 0.922 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1462 0 0 1362 0 0 2984 0 0 3240 0 ' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 27 18 12 12 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 27 5 27 89 10 27 46 807 40 24 972 46 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 59 0 0 126 0 0 893 0 0 1042 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 r Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor, CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 PM Peak LaneGrduP ..x' BL ` BT.,, BR � INBLkBT "WBR -4 NBL ' I�BT j NBR= SBL sBT SBR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 ' Total Split(s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Total Split(%) 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% Maximum Green(s) 16.1 " 16.1 16.1 16.1 41.7 41.7 41.7 41.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 ' Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 11.1 11.1 46.7 46.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.67 0.67 , v/c Ratio 0.23 0.55 0.45 0.48 Control Delay 17.9 32.0 6.7 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.9 32.0 6.7 6.9 ' LOS B C A A Approach Delay 17.9 32.0 6.7 6.9 Approach LOS B C A A ' Queue Length 50th(ft) 12 44 74 90 Queue Length 95th(ft) 40 87 138 163 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 , Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 357 327 1996 2167 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.39 0.45 0.48 Intersection Summary ' Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 , Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated ' Maximum v/c Ratio:0.55 Intersection Signal Delay:8.6 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min)15 ' Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 �t Ol R U 2 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 PM Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' r 1 1 Exhibit 25 Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets Ir 2017 Combined (Build) Saturday Midday Peak Hour r r 1 1 r 1 r r r N Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation, Route 5, South Windsor CT ' 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park- Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 SAT Peak Lane{Group_�`. 'EBL „ EBT rBRINBI� 'Yll(BT =:WBR', _ NBL 4 NBT NBF2 SBL `SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41 44, 41a 4"4 , Traffic Volume(vph) 38 8 38 81 9 20 36 633 41 33 577 36 Future Volume(vph) 38 8 38 81 9 20 36 633 41 33 577 36 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.939 0.975 0.991 0.992 Flt Protected 0.978 0.965 0.997 0.997 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1711 0 0 1753 0 0 3497 0 0 3500 0 ' Flt Permitted 0.831 0.786 0.890 0.885 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1454 0 0 1428 0 0 3122 0 0 3107 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes , Satd.Flow(RTOR) 41 16 11 11 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1033 977 126 535 , Travel Time(s) 23.5 22.2 2.9 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 41 9 41 88 10 22 39 688 45 36 627 39 Shared Lane Traffic(%) I Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 91 0 0 120 0 0 772 0 0 702 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right , Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane ' Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 ' Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel ' Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex , Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 2 1 1 , Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 Detector Phase 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Switch Phase , Minimum Initial(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 S.T.A.R.Recreation,Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings S.T.A.R. Recreation Route 5, South Windsor, CT 3: North Site Drive/Crow Park - Scantic & Route 5 Combined 2017 SAT Peak Lane Group EBL . „-EBT EBI� -WBL ;TA. WBR ` NBL NBT NBR 5BL SBT PSBR Minimum Split(s) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Total Split(s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split(%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% Maximum Green(s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 Yellow Time(s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green(s) 11.6 11.6 56.2 56.2 ' Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.70 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.55 0.35 0.32 Control Delay 22.4 36,2 5.5 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.4 36.2 5.5 5.3 LOS C D A A Approach Delay 22.4 36.2 5.5 5.3 Approach LOS C D A A Queue Length 50th(ft) 23 49 62 54 Queue Length 95th(ft) 60 94 114 102 Internal Link Dist(ft) 953 897 46 455 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 537 511 2195 2185 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 ' Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.23 0.35 0.32 Intersection Summary - - Area Type. Other Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length:80 Offset:0(0%), Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Yellow Natural Cycle:40 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.55 Intersection Signal Delay:8.5 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service B ' Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:North Site Drive/Crow Park-Scantic&Route 5 ' #01 R` p2 S.T.A.R.Recreation, Route 5,South Windsor,CT 8/10/2015 Combined 2017 SAT Peak Synchro 8 Light Report ' Bubaris Traffic Associates 9/6/2016 Exhibit 26 ' Traffic Crash Experience Data Route 5 at Scantic Road Study Area ' 3 Years: 2011, 2012 and 2013 Source: Connecticut Department of Transportation ' From 11112011 12:00:00 AM until 121311201311:59:59 PM page 1 of 5 Report Generated 81412015 12:01:48 PM Route/Road 005 Mile Marker 43.07 to 43.25 Total of 18 accidents Date Town Road Mile Location DOT# Police Case# Contributing Lighting Surface Weather Collision Type. Description Factor Condition Condition Mon Dec-30-13 South Windsor (US route 43.11 250 feet South of 2139811 201303811 Speed Too Fast For Dark-Lighted Ice No Adverse Fixed Object 3:46 005) SCANTIC RD Conditions Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Curbing/Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 Right f Off Road and Shoulder,Right Wed Nov-30-11 South Windsor (US route 43.12 200 feet South of 1822671 201103859 Defective Daylight Dry No Adverse Miscellaneous 13:33 005) SCANTIC RD Equipment Condition Non-collision Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor North Tractor Semi- None Apply Vehicle Going Straight K A B C Total Trailer 0 0 0 0 0 Tue Aug-30-11 South Windsor (US route 43.15 30 feet S of 1812137 201102806 Improper Lane Daylight Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 15:52 005) SCANTIC RD Change Condition Same Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Left 0 0 0 0 0 ' South Automobile None Apply a Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Tue May-24-11 South Windsor (US route 41,16 at SCANTIC RD 1774270 201101658 Failed To Grant Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Turning- ' 20:50 005) Right Of Way Condition Opposite Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply 40 Vehicle Making a"U"Turn 0 0 0 0 0 From 11112011 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 2 of 5 Report Generated 8/4/2015 12:01:48 PM Route/Road 005 Mile Marker 43.07 to 43.25 Total of 18 accidents Date Town Road Mile Location DOT# Police Case# Contributing Lighting Surface Weather Collision Type Description Factor Condition Condition Thu Jul-28-11 South Windsor(US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 1811296 201102415 Failed To Grant Daylight Dry No Adverse Fixed Object , 13:56 005) Right Of Way Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total ' South Automobile Vehicle Avoiding Vehicle Making a"U"Turn Curbing Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Making a"U"TurnRight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Oct-05-11 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 1799129 201103228 Failed To Grant Daylight Dry No Adverse Turning- , 12:07 005) Right Of Way Condition Opposite Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries ' Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply ® Vehicle Making a"U"Turn 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Jun-13-12 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 1877823 201201862 Following Too Daylight Wet Rain Rear-end ' 6:36 005) Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or I Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Thu Jul-26-12 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 1880131 201202364 Speed Too Fast For Daylight Wet Rain Turning- , 8:48 005) Conditions Intersecting Paths Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries ' Factor K A B C Total North Tractor Semi- None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Trailer West Single Unit None Apply It Vehicle Turning Left from Proper 0 0 1 0 1 Truck 2 Axle 6 Lane Tires ' From 11112011 12:00.00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 3 of 5 Report Generated 81412015 12:01:48 PM Route/Road 005 Mite Marker 43.07 to 43.25 Total of 18 - - accidents Date- Town Road Mile Location DOT# - Police Case# Contributing Lighting Surface Weather Collision Type Descdptlon Factor'< Condition Condition Fri Aug-10-12 South Windsor (US route 43.16 20 feet South of 1890225 201202545 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 7:10 0,05) SCANTIC RD Closely Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1sF/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Jan-16-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2047351 201300176 Improper Passing Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Sideswipe- 17:20 005) Maneuver Same Direction Factor Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1sU2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries South Single Unit None Apply Vehicle Going Straight K A B C Total 0 0 0 0 0 Truck 2 Axle 6 Tires r South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Passing Same Direction on 0 0 0 0 0 Left Wed Jan-16-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2047353 201300177 FollowingToo - 18.03 005) Dark Lighted Wet Rain Rear end Closely Contrib, Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st(2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply it Going Straight 0 0 0 1 1 South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Previous Accident 0 0 0 0 0 ' South Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Previous Accident 0 0 0 1 1 South Single Unit Vehicle Stopped For Previous Accident 0 0 0 0 0 Truck 2 Axle 6 Tires Wed Jan-23-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2047383 201300258 Failed To Grant Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 13:12 005) Right Of Way Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1sU2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Single Unit None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Truck 2 Axle 4 . Tires South Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Vehicle Making a"U"Turn 0 0 1 0 1 i From 111120 1 1 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 4 of 5 Report Generated 81412015 12:01:48 PM Route/Road 005 Mile Marker 43.07 to 43.25 Total of 18 accidents Date Town Road Milo Location DOT# Police Case# Contributing lighting Surface Weather Collision Type Description Factor Condition Condition Sat Feb-23-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2061744 201300587 Following Too Daylight Wet Rain Rear-end ' 14:08 005) Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix lst/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total ' North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or 0 Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Thu Jul-04-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2119435 201302001 Following Too Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Rear-end ' 22:21 005) Closely Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 ' North Automobile None Apply 1 Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Aug-21-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2115005 201302478 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 13:48 005) Closely Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1sU2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 ' North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Sun Oct-20-13 South Windsor (US route 43.16 at SCANTIC RD 2130887 201303089 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end ' 9:13 005) Closely Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic Signal 0 1 0 0 1 ' North Automobile None Apply M Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 1 1 1 From 11112011 12.00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 5 of 5 Report Generated 81412015 12:01:48 PM Route/Road 005 Mile Marker 43.07 to 43.25 Total of 18 accidents Date Town Road Mile Location DOT# Police,Caself Contributing Lighting Surface Weather Collision Type ' Description Factor Condition Condition Wed Nov-21-12 East Windsor (US route 43.22 at(US 5-S MAIN 2021390 12301 Under The Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 19:53 005) ST/PURPLE Influence Condition Same Direction HEART HWY) ' Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stf2nd Object Struck istl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Right 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 Tue Dec-17-13 East Windsor (US route 43.22 at(US 5-S MAIN 2140125 13-327 Speed Too Fast For Dark-Not Snow/Slush Snow Angle 21:49 005) ST/PURPLE Conditions Lighted HEART HWY) Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1sti2nd Object Struck 1sti2nd Object Location Injuries Factor ruc K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic Sign 0 0 0 0 0 East Single Unit Vehicle Slowing For Construction or Maintenance Work 0 0 0 0 0 Truck 2 Axle 4 ' Tires r t 1`¢ Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Main Street .Q Hartford, Connecticut 06106-5310 Telephone: (860) 522-2217 Fag: (860) 724-1274 ' www.crcog.org Melody A.Currey,Chairman Lyle Wray,Executive Director SUBDIVISION REFERRAL FORM FOR: NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY FROM: ( )Planning Commission (X)Planning and Zoning Commission (Municipality) TO: Capitol Region Council of Governments Policy Development&Planning Department 241 Main Street (date) Hartford,CT 06106 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8-26 of the General Statutes of Connecticut,as amended,the following proposed subdivision is referred to the Capitol Region Council of Governments for comment: The proposed subdivision entitled: S. �' 1� 1, LJ containing S0-C44-2_ acres being subdivided into 3 lots will include or abut land in the following O will include or abut land in the following towns in Capitol Region Municipalities EC-5-V fin/, adjacent regions Name and Mailing Address of the Subdivision Applicant is: Additional Comments: PUBLIC HEARING,IF ANY,IS SCHEDULED FOR: 4�i�' (date) MATERIAL SUBMITTED HEREWITH: Oc) Application Form ( ) Street&Utility Plans and Profiles ( ) Other Specify: ( ) Topo Map Site Location Map HAS THIS SUBDIVISION BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY TO CRCOG? YES NO. IF YES,ON WHAT DATE: (FOR USE BY CRCOG) (Authorized Signature) Date Received Title Sent Certified? File Number S-2011- Address I$-go Act SmK W i jad jJ,' n "� BY LAW,THE.PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ITS PROPOSAL TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY NOT LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN RELATION THERETO.NOTICE SHALL BE MADE BY CERTIFIED MAIL,RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. CRCOG-12/10 A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region 01 94-Z1►L IL vanr w low OW ISO PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: 9/7/16 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Mark Owens, Chris Dougan, Heather Oatis, Kevin Cooney, John Caldwell, Andrea Confrancesco, Chris Duchesne, Vincent Stetson FROM: Michele Lipe, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning &Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 16-51P, S.T.A.R. Center Subdivision and Site Plan Location: 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Bouelvard ® Site Plan ® Subdivision No. Acres 9 Zone A-20 Rte 5N Overlay Zone ❑ Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential No. Lots/Units 3 Water: ® Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ® Septic System Project Description: Create new commercial lot;_24,000 Recreation Facility Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑ new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by 9/23/16 and return to the Planning Department. Page 1 of 1 Zarambo, Lauren L. From: Oatis, Heather Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 10:07 AM To: Zarambo, Lauren L. Subject: RE: Three In House Referral Forms Attachments: B100a application.pdf Appl. 16-49P—Applicant to complete B100a application (attached) to demonstrate that the remaining original lot still has room for a reserve septic system and that the new lots can accommodate both a primary and reserve septic system. Soil testing may need to be conducted. I believe there was some historical soil data available for system sizing information. Appl. 16-50P—This is on septic, not sewers as marked. A plan has been submitted and comments have been sent back to DPI. Waiting on a revised plan before approval will be given. Appl 16-51 P—A septic plan is currently under review for this project. Heather Oads,REHS, HHS Environmental Health Officer Ph: 860-644-2511 ext.250 Fax: 860-644-7280 www.southwinelsor.org From: Zarambo, Lauren L. Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 9:58 AM -: To: Caldwell, John; Cofrancesco, Andrea; Cooney, Kevin; Doolittle, Jeffrey; Dougan, Christopher; Duchesne, Christopher; Favreau, Raymond; Galligan, Matthew; Gantick, Michael; Oatis, Heather; Owens, Mark; Shaw, Fred; Stetson, Vincent; Summers, Walter Subject: Three In House Referral Forms Please find attached In House Referral forms for: Appl. 16-49P, Aman Resubdivision, 99 Main Street Appl. 16-50P, McQuire Road Associates, LLC dba Hartford Truck Equipment, 95 John Fitch Boulevard Appl. 16-51P, Tellier Properties LLC dba S.T.A.R. Center, 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard Please forward any comments or questions to the Planning Department. Thank you, Lauren L Zarambo Planning Department Secretary Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT o6074 86o.644•2511 ext 253 9/8/2016 Page 1 of 2 Lipe, Michele From: Oatis, Heather Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 2:56 PM To: Lipe, Michele Subject: FW: South Windsor Star Center Septic Plan (2045 &2063 John Fitch Blvd) Heather Oatis,REHS,HHS Environmental Health Officer Ph: 860-644-2511 ext.250 Fax:860-644-7280 www.southwindsor.org From: Oatis, Heather Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:24 AM To: 'Daniel Jameson' Cc: Ben Wheeler; James Bernardino; 'sean.merrigan@ct.gov' Subject: RE: South Windsor Star Center Septic Plan (2045 &2063 John Fitch Blvd) My comments so far: Star Center: 1. What is the center-to-center spacing for the primary and reserve systems? 2. Last I knew there was a proposed food service area in the establishment. Please confirm this has been eliminated. Parcel 2: 1. The current septic system does not meet the separation distance for the new lot line. It must be at least 10 feet away from the property line. Parcel 3: 1. The reserve area is indicated within the area of the current system. Please find a stand alone area on the property that can accommodate the reserve area. Heather Oatis,REHS,HHS Environmental Health Officer Ph: 860-644-2511 ext.250 Fax:860-644-7280 www.southwindsor.org From: Daniel Jameson [ma ilto:DJa meson @designprofessionalsinc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:59 AM To: Oatis, Heather Cc: Ben Wheeler; James Bernardino Subject: South Windsor Star Center Septic Plan (2045 &2063 John Fitch Blvd) Good Morning Heather, See attached for an updated septic plan for the proposed Start Center for your review. If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact me. 9/12/2016 33o O September 14,2015 To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Peter R. DeMallie of Design Professionals, Inc.to sign any land use commission applications with respect to my properties at 2045&2063 John Fitch Boulevard in South Windsor, Connecticut. Sincerely, Paul R.Tellier Tellier Properties, LLC South • • Planning Department Memo To: Daniel Jamieson From: Michele Lipe, Director of Planning Date: 10/6/16 Re: #16-51 P, STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments Following are review comments from the Planning Department. Please make appropriate revisions and submit seven complete sets to the Planning Department at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting (scheduled for October 24). Engineering comments will be forthcoming. If you have any questions, please call. General Comment The plans are a little difficult to read as several layers have been displayed very lightly. Please make sure the appropriate layers are shown. The key map should clearly delineate the town line. Subdivision Plan Comments 1. The subdivision plan provided is only a plot plan/easement plan. Please add to topo to conform with subdivision requirements. The subdivision plan should not show any new commercial structure or parking area; it should existing structures on site and the deposition of such structures as it relates to the zoning should be readily visible. (E.g. structures noted to be removed) 2. It appears that the land to north, indicated as Parcel A, is being conveyed out with this subdivision "for Agricultural purposes". The remaining survey of the property should be provided with this subdivision plan. 3. The zoning data table for Lot#1 should reflect zoning requirements for the establishment of the commercial lot. This should not show the building parking etc. This plan is strictly to establish this as a new building lot. 4. As discussed previously, since you are establishing new sizes for the residential lots and they are not going to meet the commercial requirements for lot size in the overlay zone, a note should be added to residential lots that they would have to be combined if the use were to be changed to commercial. 5. All easements should be shown in the easement table (Pipeline easement should be reflected) and the pipe line easement should be easily identifiable on the plot plan. 1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,CT 06074 PH 860-644-2511,ext.253 Fax 860-644-7280 e-mail michele.lipeasouthwindsor.org 0 Page 1 6. Recommend that the access easement to service the tree farm be the least required for the subdivision (assumption is the access drive is existing). The extension of this easement out to the new entrance on Route 5 can be proposed with the site plan request. 7. Both new access easements being created should reference providing access to Parcel A. 8. Utility connections should be demonstrated for all three lots. It appears there are some yard drains that are on the residential lots that are remaining. Site Plan comments 1. The southern most parking lot encroaches into the side yard. The regulations require a minimum of 10 foot separation from the residential lot. 2. The parking spaces shown as reserve were not approved by IWA/CC. Please provide a parking modification request and the required supporting documentation. 3. 'The existing parking area and access drive to the tree farm on proposed lot #3 is shown being realigned by the new drive however there are no changes shown on the residential lot. Is this area going to be grassed? 4. Lighting levels provided throughout the parking area are low in some areas. At the ADRC meeting it was suggested they be reviewed. Consideration should be given for reducing light levels in the evening after the close of the facility. Landscape Plan 1. I have concerns that the building is not adequately screened form the adjacent residential property to the north. Do you have any cross-section to illustrate this view shed from the north? 2. The arborvitaes on the north side of the building are being planted in a very tight area. The corner of the building is 15 feet from property line, there is a 10 foot pipe line easement and screening trees are included in this area. Is there any correspondence from the Pipeline Company regarding the setback of building from there easements and the approximately of the plantings to the existing easement? In the information we have from the pipe line, they suggest that trees and shrubbery not be planted in or adjacent to their easement. 3. Can the electrical transformer be located any where besides the primary landscape island by the main entrance? Post ADRC meeting of 10/13 Updated architectural and landscape plans should be submitted if any changes result form the meeting. Health Department Star Center: 1. What is the center-to-center spacing for the primary and reserve systems? • Page 2 2. Last I knew there was a proposed food service area in the establishment. Please confirm this has been eliminated. Parcel 2: 1. The current septic system does not meet the separation distance for the new lot line. It must be at least 10 feet away from the property line. Parcel 3: 1. The reserve area is indicated within the area of the current system. Please find a stand alone area on the property that can accommodate the reserve area. •Page 3 �p.N N SC4 OTov� O-P slou� V&U&O't 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR-CO � TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 October 12, 2016 Tellier Properties, LLC C/o Peter R. DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: RE: Appl. 16-51P, Tellier Properties, LLC, dba S.T.A.R. Center- request for a three lot subdivision of 4.9 acres to create one new lot; request for Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 and Site Plan of Development for a 24,810 sf recreational facility on Lot #3, on property located at 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard (westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor Town Line), A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay Zone Please be advised that the Public Hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission in the above referenced matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Someone must be present at the meeting to represent the application. One sign advertising the meeting must be posted on the property for ten (10) consecutive days prior to the meeting and must be clearly visible from a town street. The sign must be posted on John Fitch Boulevard by Friday, October 14, 2016. Signs can be obtained in the Planning Department, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call 860-644- 2511, Ext 253. Sincerely, Lauren Zarambo Administrative Secretary Page 1 of 1 Lipe, Michele From: Oatis, Heather Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 8:52 AM To: 'Daniel Jameson' Cc: 'Ben Wheeler'; 'James Bernardino'; Lipe, Michele Subject: South Windsor Star Center Septic Plan (2045 &2063 John Fitch Blvd) Thank you for your patience. I've confirmed that all comments from the Health Department have been addressed and will be signing off on this project. I'll be sending out a plan approval letter with copies of the signed B100a application. The Planning Department has also been CCed on this email for their notification purposes. Heather Oatis,REHS,HHS Environmental Health Officer Ph: 860-644-2511 ext.250 Fax:860-644-7280 www.southwindsor.org 10/13/2016 MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe, Director of Plannning From: Jeff Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer �� Date: October 14, 2016 Re: App 16-51 P STAR Center, 2075 John Fitch Blvd I have reviewed the Resubdivision and Site Plan for the property located at 2075 John Fitch Blvd, and I have the following comments: 1. The proposed entrance has a short S curve that may be difficult for vehicles to use. Suggest this be straightened out at an angle with the parking lot and a single curve at the road. 2. The proposed driveway has one exit lane that will accommodate almost 4 cars stopped at the traffic signal before they back up in the parking lot. What que length is needed in the exit lane for the traffic expected at this facility? Traffic should not back-up in the parking lot where it would interfere with parking. Consider adding a separate right turn lane in the driveway. 3. The 7 reserve parking spaces west of the building are below the proposed retaining wall and will be impractical to build and access as shown. Suggest these reserve spaces be relocated or the wall moved west to accommodate the reserve parking spaces in the future. 4. Will there be curb in front of the gravel drive to the west and will vehicles be expected to drive over the curb to use this driveway? 5. The access from the proposed southern parking area to Lot 3 does not line up with the existing gravel drive on Lot 3. The gravel drive or proposed parking area access need to be relocated so they line up. 6. The curb designation CIVIC is new to us so I checked the details and found "Concrete Mountable Curb". This sounds like a portland cement concrete curb but the detail shows what the Town calls Butuminous Concrete Slope Curbing and State calls Special Bituminous Lip Curb. I suggest the designation for this curb and the detail be changed to include Bituminous Slope Curb so as not to confuse contractors. 7. The FEMA flood line for Zone AE appears to cross the proposed site development at the concrete dumpster pad area. This needs to be investigated and if there is really a conflict, the site plan needs to be modified to remove all fill out of the flood zone. If there is not a conflict a request for a Letter of Map Ammendment should be sent to FEMA by the property owner and their engineer to adjust the flood line per the surveyed elevations on the site and the established flood elevation. 1 8. The Stormwater Drainage report needs to include pre and post development flows from the site for the 2, 10, 25 and 100 yr storms for reference. 9. The calculations for the Stormceptor unit need to include how the impervious % area was calculated, the design water quality flow and the peak flow conveyed to the unit and accommodated by the size unit selected. 10.There is typically a bypass manhole associated with storm water quality units. How will large stormwater flows bypass this unit? 11.The stormwater inlet report shows significant ponding around CB 3, 4 and 8 during a 10 year storm. Consider making these catch basins double type catch basins to reduce ponding around them. 12.1 like the proposed underground rainwater storage tank next to the building. We will need details on this unit, including the size, elevation, depth, overflow piping size and elevation and how rain water will be removed from this tank for irrigation purposes. 13.Provide calculations for sizing the stilling basin. 14.Revise the dumpster pad detail to have 8 inches of class F concrete with reinforcing. Please let me know if you have any questions. 2 CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 241 Main Street/Hartford/Connecticut/06106 CRCOGWorking together for a better region. Phone(860)522-2217/Fax(860) 724-1274 www.crwg.org October 21,2016 TO: SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ON SUBDIVISION REFERRAL S-2016-6: Proposed 3 lot resubdivision of a 5+acre site located at 2045&2063 John Fitch Boulevard.The site is within 500 feet of the Town of East Windsor and is located in an A-20(residential)zone with a Route 5 North Overlay Zone designation. COMMISSIONERS: Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mentioned referral. Notice of this proposal was transmitted to the Policy and Planning Division of the Capitol Region Council of Governments under the provisions of Section 8-23f of the Connecticut General Statutes,as amended. COMMENT: The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region Council of Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. Questions concerning this referral should be directed to Lynne Pike DiSanto. In accordance with our procedures this letter will constitute final CRCOG action on this referral. The public hearing date has been scheduled for 10/25/2016. DISTRIBUTION: Planner: Hartford,Windsor,East Windsor,Ellington,Vernon,Manchester,East Hartford Respectfully submitted, Sandra Bobowski, Chairman Regional Planning Commission Karl Robert Profe,Vice Chairman Regional Planning Commission L e Pi DiSanto,AICP Pr* ' lanner and Policy Analyst 41 @¢cnTH Att �cri�nt JMJI l( nrvnT Andover/Avon/Berlin/Bloomfield/Bolton/Canton/Columbia/Coventry/East Granby/East Hartford/East Windsor/Ellington/Enfield/Farmington/ Glastonbury/Granby/Hartford/Hebron/Manchester/Mansfield/Marlborough/New Britain/Newington/Plainville/Rocky Hill/Simsbury/Somers/South Windsor/Southington/Stafford/Suffield/Tolland/Vernon/West Hartford/Wethersfield/Willington/Windsor/Windsor Locks A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:860.291.875 7 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Ma5eachu5ctt5, *Rhode Island • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Michele Lipe Date: 10/24/2016 DPI Project No. 3300 Town of South Windsor Re: S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard PZC Application Resubdivision/Site Plan/Special Exception WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ® Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 10/24/16 PZC Application(revised for parking modification request) 2 10/24/16 Storm Drainage Report 3 10/24/16 Full Size Plan Sets 7 10/24/16 11x17 site plan sets 1 10/24/16 Responses letters to Jeff Doolittle&Michele Lipe 1 10/24/16 Parking Modification request Narrative Statement These are transmitted as checked below: ® For Approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval • ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ® For review and comment ❑ For bids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: • • • • )r;f • t 2016 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEpT SIGNED: CC: Daniel H. Jameson, . TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM Application Number: Official Receipt Date: / / Ll Munis Application #: -2D1 APPLICANT: Tellier Properties, LLC SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT NAME: S.T.A.R. Center COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2045&2063 John Fitch Boulevard OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Paul R.&Judith M.Tellier OWNER ADDRESS: 2063 John_Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 GIS PIN# 47702045&47702063 ZONE A20 R5NOZ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE&EMAIL ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor CT 06074 860-291-8755 pdemallie@dpinc.co Estimated presentation time: 30 min. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Open Space Subdivision/Resubdivision (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ® Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑X Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Subdivision Q Special Exception to Table 5.8.4 B.5 (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ® Site Plan of Development ® New ❑ Modification Building(s) Sq Ft 24,810 ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Dept of Motor Vehicle License - State Hearing per Section 14-55 for ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 7.6) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 7.16) (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑Zoning ❑ Subdivision -Attach proposed amendment (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit Renewal (Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Detached In Law Apartment or❑Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing and Certificate of Mailing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation (Certificate of Mailing Required) for ❑ Other(explain in detail) Parking modification request per Sec.6.4.6 to reduce the required parking spaces from 100 to 93 spaces(7 space reduction) *An Application Pending Sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten(10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. F � f Signature o Applica t S' nature of Property caner P.O. BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode Island • • • • • • Parking Waiver Request l i Resubdivison/Site Plan/Special Exception Tellier Properties, LLC j.SOLITH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Blvd. South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj. No. 3300 October 24,2016 On behalf of Tellier Properties, LLC; Design Professionals, Inc. would like to request a modification to reduce the minimum required parking spaces (per section 6.4.9 of the zoning regulations)by 7 spaces. 100 spaces are required and 93 currently proposed. The 93 spaces will be more than adequate for anticipated S.T.A.R. Center activities. The facility in East Windsor currently used by ECE All-Star Cheer has only 22 parking spaces and functions adequately with 85 athletes plus coaching staff. Most participants are dropped off and : picked up by a family member for normal daily operations. Regards, B amin P. Wheeler, PLA Director of Operations P.O. BOX 1 167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.875 7 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, E Rhode Island • • October 24, 2016 M Michele Lipe • Director of Planning : Town of South Windsor s0;Tia tAfj n„ �IN i � „j Mir • 1540 Sullivan Ave 7 South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 : Re: #16-51P, STAR Center Subdivision/ Site Plan Review Comments DPI Poject No. 3300 Design Professional Inc. (DPI) are in receipt of your comments dated 10/6/2016. DPI offers the following in response to those comments. For ease of your continued review, we have reiterated : comments in italics followed by responses noted in bold: General Comments : 1. The plans area little difficult to read as several layers have been displayed very lightly. Please make sure the appropriate layers are shown. The key map should clearly delineate the town line. i. The Re-Subdivsion plan sheets have been modified to better display existing condition structures, topography, and town lines. Please see sheets T-1, CS-1, CS-2. Subdivision Plan Comments 1. The subdivision plan provided is only a plot plan/easement plan. Please add to topo to conform with subdivision requirements. The subdivision plan should not show any new commercial : structure or parking area; it should existing structures on site and the deposition of such structures as it relates to the zoning should be readily visible. (E.g. structures noted to be removed) i. Topography has been added to the plan and existing structure lines were darkened. All proposed structures and parking is no longer depicted. Call outs were also added to structures that are to be removed. Please see sheets CS-1 & CS-2. • 2. It appears that the land to the north, indicated as Parcel A, is being conveyed out with this subdivision 'for Agricultual purposes". The remaining survey of the property should be provided with this subdivision plan. i. Sheet CS-1 now depicts the entire tract including "Parcel A" to remain for agricultural purposes. The original CS-1 is now sheet CS-2. • G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response to M Lipe 2016-10-1 l.docx STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 24,2016 Pg.2 3. The zoning data table for Lot#1 should reflect zoning requirements for the establishment of the commercial lot. This should not show the building park etc. This plan is strictly to establish this as a new building lot. i. The zoning tables on CS-2 depict only requirements for the proposed lot line modifications. No proposed information is noted. 4. As discussed previously, since you are establishing new sizes for the residential lots and they are not going to meet the commercial requirements for lot size in the overlay zone, a note should be added to residential lots that they would have to be combined if the use were to be changed to commercial. i. The following note has been added as note 11 & 6 on sheets CS-1 & CS-2 respectively: "In the event that Lots #2 & #3 are to be turned into commercial lots, the lot would need to meet zoning regulations specified in table 4.1.6A of South Windsor's Zoning Regulations for the Route 5 Overlay Zone. the minimum commercial lot area shall be no less than 30,000 s.f." 5. All easements should be shown in the easement table (Pipeline easement should be reflected) and the pipe line easement should be easily identifiable on the plot plan. i. The pipeline easement was added to the easement table. See sheet CS-2. 6. Recommend that the access easement to service the tree farm be the least required for the subdivision (assumption is the access drive is existing). The extension of this easement out to the new entrance on Route 5 can be proposed with the site plan request. i. The access easement to all 2045 John Fitch Blvd. to utilize the proposed driveway of 2075 John Fitch Blvd. has been relocated to sheet the site plan sheet. See sheet CL- 1. 7. Bothe new access easements being created should reference providing access to Parcel A. i. The easement callouts have been modified to reference access to Parcel A. See sheets CS-1, CS-2, & CL-1. 8. Utility connections should be demonstrated for all three lots. It appears there are some yard drains that are on the residential lots that are remaining. i. Proposed utility connections and existing utility connections to remain are now identified. The yard drains are actually self-contained dry wells. No changes to the dry wells are proposed. See sheets CS-1 & CS-2. esign G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response to M Lipe 2016-10-11.docx STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 24,2016 Pg.3 Site Plan comments 1. The southern most parking lot encroaches into the side yard. The regulations require a minimum of 10 foot separation from the residential lot. i. The orientation of the southern most parking area has been modified the provide the required 10 foot separation to a residential lot. See sheet CL-1. 2. The parking spaces shown as reserve were not approved by IWA/CC. Please provide a parking modification request and the required supporting documentation. i. The reserve parking area is no longer shown on the plans.A parking modification request letter has been submitted along with this letter and modified site plans. 3. The existing parking area and access drive to the tree farm on proposed lot#3 is shown being realigned by the new drive however there are no changes shown on the residential lot. Is this area going to be grassed? i. No changes are proposed for the existing gravel/bituminous drive on lot#3. The drive will be maintained to allow for emergency vehicle access. 4. Lighting levels provided throughout the parking area are low in some areas. At the ADRC meeting it was suggested they be reviewed. Consideration should be given to reducing light levels in the evening after the close of the facility. i. The lighting plan has been revised with different fixtures selected to slightly increase light levels in key areas of the parking lot. The location and number of fixtures has not changed from the original submission. The light levels will be reduced while the facility is closed. Landsea ep Plan 1. I have concerns that the building is not adequately screened from the adjacent residential property to the north. Do you have any cross-section to illustrate this view shed from the north? i. Cross-sections of the view shed were presented at the ADRC and were also previously submitted for record. esign G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response to M Upe 2016-10-11.docx i STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 24,2016 Pg.4 2. The arborvitaes on the north side of the building are being planted in a very tight area. The corner of the building is I S feet from property line, there is a 10 foot pipe line easement and screening trees are included in this area. Is there any correspondence from the Pipeline Company regarding the setback of building from there easements and the approximately of the plantings to the existing easements?In the information we have from the pipeline, they suggest that trees and shrubbery be planted in or adjacent to their easement. i. The pipeline company has been contacted and representatives have visited the site with the building corners staked in the field. To date,we have not received any concerns with the site plans. We expect written correspondence indicating so shortly. 3. Can the electrical transformer be located anywhere besides the primary landscape island by the main entrance? i. The building contractor indicated that the transformer needs to remain in this location per Eversource requirements. Post ADRC meeting of 10/13 Updated architectural and landscape plans should be submitted if any changes result from the meeting. i. Updated Architectural and landscape plans are included. See sheets LS-1 & 2 and sheets 1.1 —2.1. Health Department Approval letter received 10-17-2016 after receiving and addressing the comment below. Star Center: 1. What is the center-to-center spacing for the primary and reserve systems? i. The center to center spacing between the primary and reserve systems is 121. 2. Last I knew there was a proposed food service area in the establishment. Please confirm this has been eliminated. i. The food service area (smoothie bar) is no longer proposed. The septic design is limited to the following uses: a) Sports Theater Complex for 214 people b) 1980.3 SQFT of Retail Space c) 3894 SQFT of Office Space (19.47 Employees) See sheet CD-4 for the septic system design criteria. Parcel 2: 1. The current septic system does not meet the separation distance for the new lot line. It must be at least 10 feet away from the property line. i. A note was added to the utility plan instructing the contractor to abandon the existing system and build the code complying area. See sheet CU-1. G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response to M Upe 2016-10-1 l.docx A=onMa STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 24,2016 Pg. 5 Parcel 3: 1. The reserve area is indicated within the area of the current system. Please find a stand alone area on the property that can accommodate the reserve area. i. The proposed code complying area was moved out from the existing system location. See sheet CU-1. If you have any further comments or questions feel free to contact us. Regards, JL D IGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. Benjamin P. Wheeler, PLA Director of Operations eslsn G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response to M Upe 2016-10-11.docx P.O. BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX:860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 5erwng Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island • • October 24, 2016 • Jeff Doolittle,P.E., Town Engineer Town of South Windsor : 1540 Sullivan Ave `SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Re: App 16-51P STAR Center, 2075 John Fitch Blvd DPI Poject No. 3300 Design Professional Inc. (DPI) are in receipt of your comments dated 10/14/16. DPI offers the following in response to those comments. For ease of your continued review, we have reiterated comments in italics followed by responses noted in bold: : • 1. The proposed entrance has a short S curve that may be difficult for vehicles to use. Suggest this be straightened out at an angle with the parking lot and a single curve at the road. i. The proposed entrance drive has been modified to be straightened out to an angle with the parking lot and a single curve at the road. See Sheet CL-1. 2. The proposed driveway has one exit lane that will accommodate almost 4 cars stopped at the traffic signal before they back up in the parking lot. What que length is need in the exit lane for the traffic expected at this facility? Traffic should not back-up in the parking lot where it would interfere with parking. Consider adding a separate right turn lane in the driveway. i. Per the Traffic Report completed by Bubaris Traffic Associates,Inc. Queues under normal projected conditions would be 2,2 and 3 vehicles per cycle exiting during the weekday am,weekday pm, and Saturday midday peaks, respectively. The modified entrance layout will allow for 5 cars,thus not backing up into the parking area and blocking and parking spaces.With this a separate turn lane is not required. 3. The 7 reserve parking spaces west of the building are below the proposed retaining wall and will be impractical to build access as shown. Suggest these reverse spaces be relocated or the wall be moved west to accommodate the reverse parking spaces in the future. i. The 7 reserve spaces are no longer proposed. A parking modification request is being submitted along with this revised set to adjust the minimum parking required to be 93 spaces. See Sheet CL-1. • G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response Doolittle Commets(2016-10-20).docx STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 11,2016 Pg.2 4. Will there be curb in front of the gravel drive to the west and will vehicles be expected to drive over curb to use this driveway. i. Mountable concrete curb is proposed for all curbing around the site. The gravel drive will only be utilized by the Tellier's for access to their rear agricultural parcel.An access easement is also proposed. See sheets CL-1. 5. The access from the proposed southern parking area to Lot 3 does not lineup with the existing gravel drive on Lot. The gravel drive or proposed parking area access need to be relocated so they lineup. i. There is an existing gravel drive and bituminous pavement area at this location. Therefore realignment is not required. See sheets V-2 & CL-1. 6. The curb designation CMC is new to us so I checked the details and found "Concrete Mountable Curb". This sounds like a portland cement concrete curb but the detail shows what the Town calls Butuminous Concrete Slope Curbing and State calls Special Bituminous Lip Curb. I suggest the designation for this curb and the detail be changed to include Bituminous Slope Curb so as not to confuse contractors. i. The CMC designation does represent Concrete Mountable Curb. The detail has been revised. CONNDOT requirements for concrete materials have been specified. See sheet C-D2. 7. The FEMA flood line for Zone AE appears to cross the proposed site development at the concrete dumpster pad area. This needs to be investigated and if there is really a conflict, the site plan needs to be modified to remove all fill out of the flood zone. If there is not a conflict a request for a Letter of Map Amendment should be sent to FEMA by the property ownerand their engineer to adjust the flood line per the surveyed elevations on the site and the established flood elevation. i. A LOMA application to revise the flood line in this area will be submitted.Based on the FIRM maps for this area,the expected flood elevation is 33.No fill is proposed below this elevation,therefore we do not anticipate any issue with obtaining a L.O.M.A. 8. The Stormwater Drainage report needs to include pre and post development flows from the site for the 2, 10, 25 and 100 yr storms for reference. i. The storm drainage report was modified to include pre-& post-condition drainage flows for the site. See the revised Storm Drainage Report submitted along with the revision set. estgn G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response Doolittle Commets(2016-10-20).docx STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 11,2016 Pg.3 9. The calculations for the Stormceptor unit need to include how the impervious %area was calculated, the design water quality flow and the peakflow conveyed to the unit and accommodated by the size unit selected. i. Calculations for site impervious % have been included in the storm drainage report along with a revised stormceptor report and water quality flow calculations. In addition to the WQF,the revised report considers a peak flow rate for the 10-yr storm per town standards. See the revised storm drainage report, Appendix B. 10. There is typically a bypass manhole associated with storm water quality units. How will large stormwater flows bypass this unit? i. In addition to the WQF, sizing of the water quality unit took the 10-yr peak flow into consideration, required by town standards. See the revised storm drainage report,Appendix B. The proposed treatment unit will treat the WQF to 80% TSS, and has the ability to internally bypass the 10 yr flow. 11. The stormwater inlet report shows significant ponding around CB 3, 4 and8 during a 10 year storm. Consider making these catch basins double type catch basins to reduce ponding around them. i. CB-8 was switched to Type II double grate catch basin to accept more now. The spread is now reduced less than half the length of the parking space. We would like to keep CB-3 & 4 as is due to observed spreads of less than half the parking space length for CB-3 and half the lane width for CB-4. See the revised storm drainage report,Appendix C. 12. 1 like the proposed underground rainwater storage tank next to the building. We will need detail on this unit, including size, elevation, depth, overflow piping size and elevation and how rain water will be removed from this tank for irrigation purpose. L An overflow pipe sized for the conveyance of the 10-yr storm is proposed as an outflow for the underground rainwater storage tank. The design of the tank and size will be done by others in conjunction with the project's irrigation designs.We request the addition review be made as a condition of approval. See sheet CG-1. 13. Provide calculations for sizing the stilling basin. L Calculations for the Temporary Sediment Trap have been added to the plan and the detail has been modified to better clarify the design parameter. See sheets CE- 1 & 2. Also see Drain Report Appendix G? 14. Revise the dumpster pad detail to have 8 inches of class F concrete with reinforcing. i. The dumpster pad detail was revised to show 8" of Class F concrete with reinforcement. See sheet C-D1 esign G:\Jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response Doolittle Commets(2016-10-20).docx STAR Center Subdivision/Site Plan Review Comments October 11,2016 Pg.4 If you have any further comments or questions feel free to contact us. egards, ESIGN OFE SIONALS, INC. James Bernardino, PE Director of Engineering esign G:\jobs\3300\Docs\Correspondence\Sent\3300-Response Doolittle Commets(2016-10-20).docx nob 1 ' LTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. 1 I 1 Stormwater Drainage Report South Windsor Star Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 1 27475 Z Ns�©.�`<,�� a Prepared b : P Y Design Professionals, Inc. 21 Jeffrey Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 1 September 6, 2016 1�DSS �S Revised: October 24, 2016 1 1 Table of Contents 1 Section Page Summary I ' Site Conditions I Storm Water Management&Water Quality 1 ' Pre- Vs. Post-Development Condition Peak Flow Analysis I Storm Sewer Analysis 2 Sedimentation&Erosion Control 2 Low Impact Development Component 3 Conclusion 3 Appendices ' A NRCS Soil Survey ' B Stormceptor Report Water Quality Flow Calculation Impervious Area Calculation ' C Storm Sewer Analysis Results D Drainage Area Maps Existing Condition Drainage Areas (DA-1) ' Catchbasin Watershed Delineation(DA-2) E Existing Condition Hydrographs F Proposed Conditions Hydrographs ' G Temporary Sediment Trap Sizing 1 1 1 1 1. SUMMARY ' This project involves the construction of a 17,900 sf commercial recreational facility, paved access drives and parking areas, an onsite septic system, stormwater collection system, ' landscaping, connection to utilities and associated site improvements. There are regulated inland wetlands on the property as delineated by John Ianni, a certified soil scientist. There is no proposed filling of any regulated inland wetlands with this proposal although there is proposed ' work within the 80' upland review area. A portion of an existing paved/gravel driveway to the farmland to the west of the proposed building will be relocated in order to maintain access to the rear portion of the property. The site also contains 2 existing residential homes which will be re- subdivided onto separate lots. These houses are connected to municipal water and both lots will have code complying septic areas in conformance with the Connecticut public health code. ' 2. SITE CONDITIONS The topography of the site varies from a relatively flat(2-4%)in the eastern 250' section along ' John Fitch Boulevard with a steep embankment down to another relatively flat flood plain area. The soils in the development area according to the NRCS web soil survey generally consist of Agawam Fine Sandy Loam, 0 to 3% slopes (HSG: A) and Windsor Loamy Sand, 0 to 3% slopes ' (HSG: A). The west portion of the development area is classified as Saco Silt Loam. The NRCS mapping also indicates an"eos" delineation(escarpment) which symbolizes a steep slope or cliff associated with the Connecticut River valley flood plain. See Appendix A for NRCS web soil ' survey data. 3. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT &WATER QUALITY ' Stormwater runoff from the proposed site development area will be collected in catch basins and piped through a Stormceptor STC 900 water quality unit for treatment. The proposed stormceptor unit will serve to remove suspended solids before it is discharged to a proposed plunge pool to be located to the west of the main site disturbance. Based upon manufacture's specifications, the unit is designed to achieve an 80% total suspended solid removal which is ' recommended by The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. This removal rate will be achieved for the water quality flow. The unit is also design to bypass the 10- yr design storm. See Appendix B for sizing reports for the Stormceptor unit, water quality flow ' calculation, and impervious area determination breakdown. This report was generated using design software from their manufacturer Imbrium Systems Inc. ' 4. Pre-Vs. Post-Development Condition Peak Flow Analysis Due to the sites close proximity to the Connecticut River and associated flood plain, limiting ' post-development peak flows to be equal to or less than pre-developed peak flows is not required or warranted. Pre-Existing Condition Flow Flows Vs. Post-Conditions flows were evaluated for reference. The Natural Resources Conservation Service's TR-55 Manual was followed in ' predicting the peak rates of runoff. HydroCAD (version 2015)computer modeling software was used as application. 1 The peak rates of stormwater runoff from the development area discharging to adjacent wetlands were determined for the 2-, 10-, 25-, & 100-year storm events. Refer to Appendices E&F for ' the pre- &post-developed conditions watershed computations. Comparisons between pre- & post-development conditions were observed as follows: TABLE 1 Peak Rate of Stormwater Discharge Runoff Rate , Pre-developed Post-developed Net Change Watershed Storm Event Condition Condition Rate of Runoff ' Area Year ft3/second ft3/second ft3/second DP#1—Proposed 2 1.09 3.57 2.48 Developed Area 10 3.16 6.87 3.71 , Drainage to 25 4.47 8.80 4.33 Wetlands 100 6.96 12.33 5.37 1 5. STORM SEWER ANALYSIS The proposed subsurface stormwater collection and conveyance system was designed to ' adequately convey proposed runoff under 10- year storm event conditions. The design of the storm sewers followed the guidelines set forth in the Connecticut Department of Transportation's ' Drainage Manual. It is estimated that during a 10-year storm event, all proposed subsurface culverts will convey storm runoff without resulting in any unacceptable flooding conditions. Hydraflow Storm Sewers computer software was used for analysis. The computations are ' included in Appendix C, and a catchbasin watershed delineation map is provided in Appendix D. 6. SEDIMENTATION& EROSION CONTROL ' The project will take place in 1 phase. Erosion controls that will be implemented to minimize soil erosion and control sediment include: ' • sediment fence or wood chip berms installed downgradient of construction areas • anti-tracking pad at the construction exit • stone check dams in channel areas ' • water quality units for filtering stormwater prior to discharging into infiltration areas • staked hay bales or silt sacks installed at all catch basins after installation until paving is initiated ' • rip rap outlet protection at all discharge points • staked hay bales or approved equal at discharge outlet areas ' • creation of diversion swales to direct runoff to sized temporary sediment traps (See Appendix G for sediment trap calculations) 2 ' 7. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT ' In order to reduce the overall water usage on site, a rain water harvesting cistern will be installed to assist in site irrigation. All captured roof runoff during storm events will be conveyed to the ' cistern for storage. In the event that the maximum capacity of the cistern is exceeded, an overflow connection to to the main drainage system is proposed. The overflow pipe was designed per the CT DOT drainage manuals recommendations to size pipes for a 10-yr storm ' event. The cistern will allow for irrigation of the lawn areas and other landscaping features. This irrigation system will be designed by the manufacture prior to construction. 8. CONCLUSION It is our opinion that the proposed stormwater management design as presented on the ' accompanying site plans, will not pose any significant detrimental impacts to the environment surrounding the site. 1 1 3 Appendix A , NRCS Sol Survey Soil Map—State of Connecticut 3 (South Windsor Star Center) ' 69M 698530 698560 M590 698M 698650 698680 698710 698740 698770 69M 41°52'4'N yg� 41°52'4"N F n1 n M m� M n tMp V O N W n M S M (t^ P o M M 8 F g M 41°51'S9"N 41°51'S8"N 698500 698530 698560 698590 698620 6986M 698680 698710 699740 698770 698800 tD 3 3 Map Scale:1:1,460 iP printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet Meters NN 0 20 40 80 120 /V � 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection:Web Mercator Caner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 18N WGS84 u5pq Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—State of Connecticut (South Windsor Star Center) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(Aol) l@@ Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. 0 Area of Interest(AOI) 10 Stony Spot Soils Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Very Stony Spot Enlargement Soil Map Unit Polygons of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line Soil Map unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting $� Other Soil Map Unit Points Special Line Features soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. � •• Special point Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map V Blowout Water Features measurements. _ Streams and Canals Borrow Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: hftp://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Clay Spot J." Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Q Closed Depression Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator A/ Gravel Pit ,y US Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate 0 Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. A. Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s)listed below. Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: State.of Connecticut Mine or quarry Survey Area Data: Version 14,Sep 22,2015 ® Miscellaneous water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 0 Perennial Water or larger. V Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 28,2011—Apr 18, + Saline Spot 2011 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were . r Sandy Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background 4W Severely Eroded Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting Sinkhole of map unit boundaries may be evident. �y Slide or Slip Sodic Spot VsM Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 ' Soil Map—State of Connecticut South Windsor Star Center ' Map Unit Legend ' State of Connecticut(CT600) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI ' 29A Agawam fine sandy loam,0 to 3 1.7 17.5% percent slopes 36A Windsor loamy sand,0 to 3 2.8 29.0% percent slopes ' 102 Pootatuck fine sandy loam 0.8 8.5% 108 Saco silt loam 4.3 45.0% Totals for Area of Interest 9.7 100.0% LisDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/2/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Appendix B ' Stormceptor Report Water Quality Flow Calculation ' Impervious Area Calculation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5tarmce tor RUM ,b"Brief Stormceptor Sizing Report - Star Center South Windsor Star Center 3300 South Windsor Connecticut 1 United States of America 9/2/2016 1 Daniel Jameson Design Professionals Inc 1 860-291-8755 djameson@dpinc.co 1 Stormwater Treatment Recommendation The recommended Stormceptor Model(s)which achieve or exceed the user defined water quality objective for each site within the project are listed in the below Sizing Summary table. Star Center 1 .- 80 . 80 STC 900 The recommended Stormceptor Model achieves the water quality objectives based on the selected inputs, historical rainfall records and selected particle size distribution. 1Stormceptor Siz ing Summary Stormceptor Model %.TSS Removal Provided 6 STC 450i 72 ll 1 STC 1200 80 STC 1800 80 STC 2400 84 1 STC 3600 85 STC 4800 88 ' STC 6000 88 STC 7200 90 STC 11000 93 1 STC 13000 93 STC 16000 94 ' StormceptorMAX Custom 1 Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report—Page 1 of 2 Stormce tore DrainageSizing Details Area Water Qua lity Objective 2.87 80.0 ' 52.2 Rainfall HARTFORD WSO AIRPORT 8.19 ' Connecticut 0.64 , 3456 • Stream Storage 52 Up Stream Flow Diversion Particle Size Distribution (PSD) The 41°56'17"N 0.000 0.000 ' selected PSD defines 20.0 20.0 1.30 ' 60.0 20.0 1.80 150.0 20.0 2.20 ' 400.0 20.0 2.65 2000.0 20.0 2.65 •Stormceptor performance estimates are based on simulations using PCSWMM for Stormceptor,which uses the EPA Rainfall and Runoff modules. • Design estimates listed are only representative of specific project requirements based on total suspended solids (TSS) ' removal defined by the selected PSD, and based on stable site conditions only, after construction is completed. • For submerged applications or sites specific to spill control, please contact your local Stormceptor representative for further design assistance. , For Stormceptor Specifications and Drawings Please Visit: http://www.imbriumsystems.com/technical-specifications 1 Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report—Page 2 of 2 ' 2075 John Fitch Blvd 21 Jeffrey Drive-South Windsor, CT South Windsor Star Center (860)291-8755 eS Stormceptor Impervious Calculation www.designprofessionalsinc.com ' Watershed Total Area Impervious Area YD-1 0.27 0.05 ' YD-2 0.06 0.06 YD-3 0.26 0.16 C13-3 0.35 0.23 ' C13-4 0.18 0.13 C13-5 0.19 0.12 C13-6 0.39 0.16 ' C13-7 0.2 0.18 C13-8 0.97 0.41 TOTALS 2.87 1.5 ' Impervious 52/ Cover 1 1 S.T.A.R Center ' October 21, 2016 Water Quality Flow Calculations Per 2004 Connecticut Stormwater Quality Manual ' Per Appendix B page B-3: Water Quality Flow (WQF) _ (qu)(A)(Q), where: qu =unit peak discharge (cfs/mil/inch)per Exhibit 4-III ' A=drainage area(mil) Q=runoff depth (in watershed inches) _ [Water Quality Volume(WQV) (in acre-feet)] x [12 inches/foot] /drainage area(acres) ' Initial abstraction (Ia) in inches from Table 4-I in Chapter 4 of TR-55, needs the Curve Number(CN) To find qu with Exhibit 4-III, the following is needed: ' Time of Concentration (Tc) =say 6 mins =0.1 hours Initial Abstraction(la)/Design Precipitation (P): CN=75 ' Ia=0.667 inches Design Precipitation (P) = 1 inch for water quality storms per Appendix B Ia/P=0.667 ' Exhibit 4-III doesn't include Ia/P greater than 0.5 qu= saw cfs/mil/inch A=0.044 mil ' Q=WQV (acre-feet)x 12/drainage area(acres) , Water Quality Volume(WQV) _ (1")(R)(A)/l2, where: R=volumetric runoff coefficient=0.05 +0.009(I), where I=percent impervious cover=52% A=site area in acres =2.87 acres ' R=0.05 +0.009(I) R=0.05 +0.009(52) R=0.518 , WQV= (1")(R)(A)/12 WQV =(1")(0.518)(2.87)/12 ' WQV =0.12 ac-ft Q= (WQV X 12 in/ft)/Drainage Area ' Q= (0.12 acre-feet x 12)/2.87 acres Q=0.518 in WQF=quxAxQ ' WQF=280 cfs/mil/inch x 0.0044 mil x 0.518 in WQF=0.638 cfs required ' Proposed The proposed Stormceptor 900 exceeds the requirements and is rated for 80% TSS removal for a design flow of , 8.19 cfs (10-yr storm flow, see line 4 of the storm sewer tabulation of the pipe capacity analysis). 1 G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/24/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 ' Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) ' 0.730 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A (1 S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 9S) 0.520 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1 S, 3S, 7S, 9S) ' 0.020 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D (8S) 0.100 76 Gravel roads, HSG A (9S) 1.500 98 IMPERVIOUS (2S,4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S, 9S, 10S) ' 2.870 75 TOTAL AREA 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix C ' Storm Sewer Analysis Results 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® Plan YD 3 12 1 Q� YD 2 0 11 0 YD 1 CB 7 13 Roof(Rainwater Tank) 8 2 Q pAl CB 6 7 1 DMH 1 Q� Outfall P1 CB 5 to 10 6 � Q .pa2 CB4 5 Q4 �0 3 P' DMH 2 .j9 CB 8(TYPE II) Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:13 Date:10/21/2016 Storm Sewers 00.50 Storm Sewer Tabulation Pagel Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vell Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Gmd I Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full Line To 7nt)al Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (C) (min) (min) (inlhr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 30.821 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 10.2 4.8 8.09 9.46 5.62 18 0.81 24.00 24.25 25.18 25.35 25.52 32.17 P1 2 1 125.478 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 10.1 4.8 8.14 9.84 12.19 12 6.50 29.17 37.33 29.86 38.32 32.17 42.38 P2 3 2 98.000 0.00 2.87 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.0 9.9 4.8 8.19 9.03 10.79 12 5.48 37.43 42.80 38.32 43.79 42.38 45.64 P3 4 3 7.000 0.35 2.87 0.66 0.23 1.70 8.0 9.9 4.8 8.19 8.99 10.79 12 5.43 42.90 43.28 43.79 44.27 45.64 48.90 P4 5 4 69.175 0.13 0.83 0.63 0.08 0.35 8.0 8.9 5.0 1.75 2.74 3.71 12 0.51 43.81 44.16 44.39 44.74 48.90 49.10 P5 6 5 67.325 0.09 0.70 0.36 0.03 0.27 8.0 8.6 5.1 1.36 6.26 3.18 12 2.63 44.26 46.03 44.85 46.52 49.10 49.40 P6 7 6 53.864 0.39 0.61 0.49 0.19 0.24 8.0 8.3 5.1 1.21 2.73 3.37 12 0.50 46.13 46.40 46.60 46.87 49.40 49.40 P7 8 7 37.852 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.04 0.04 8.0 8.0 5.2 0.23 1.85 1.95 8 2.01 46.67 47.43 46.95 47.65 49.40 50.10 P8 9 4 116.400 0.97 0.97 0.57 0.55 0.55 8.0 8.0 5.2 2.88 4.52 5.41 12 1.37 45.90 47.50 46.48 48.23 48.90 50.50 P12 10 4 124.668 0.20 0.72 0.83 0.17 0.56 6.0 9.4 4.9 2.77 3.19 4.20 12 0.68 43.38 44.23 44.27 44.94 48.90 47.00 P9 11 10 63.971 0.01 0.11 0.90 0.01 0.03 6.0 8.5 5.1 0.15 1.95 1.22 8 2.22 44.33 45.75 44.94 45.93 47.00 49.90 P10 12 11 73.808 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.02 0.02 8.0 8.0 5.2 0.10 1.85 2.34 8 2.01 45.85 47.33 45.96 47.48 49.90 50.00 P11 13 10 19.000 0.41 0.41 0.90 0.37 0.37 6.0 6.0 5.7 2.10 3.36 4.75 10 2.00 44.33 44.71 44.94 45.36 47.00 50.00 P13 Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:13 Run Date: 10/21/2016 NOTES:Intensity=54.74/(Inlet time+10.80)^0.80; Return period=Yrs.10 c=cir e=ellip b=box Storm Sewers 00.50 Inlet Report Pagel Line Inlet ID Cl Q Q Q Junc Curb Inlet Grate Inlet Gutter Inlet Byp No CIA carry capt Byp Type Line Ht L Area L W So W �Sw Sx n Depth Spread Depth Spread Depr No (S) (S) (S) (aft) (in) (ft) (s4ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft) (fvft) (ft/ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) 1 DMH 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 2 DMH 2 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 3 STC-900 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MH 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sag 12.00 0.030 0.030 0.011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Off 4 CB 3 1.20 0.00 1.20 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 1.35 2.31 ag 12.00 0.030 0.030 0.011 0.18 6.16 0.27 6.16 1.0 5 CB 4 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.024 0.024 0.013 0.11 4.59 0.19 4.59 1.0 Off 6 CB 5 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 Sag 12.00 0.038 0.038 0.013 0.08 2.02 0.16 2.02 1.0 Off 7 CB 6 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 ag 12.00 0.036 0.036 0.013 0.19 5.23 0.27 5.23 1.0 Off 8 YD 1 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.00 Grate 0.0 0.00 1.76 1.55 2.00 Sag 12.00 0.092 0.092 0.013 0.11 1.25 0.20 1.25 1.0 9 CB 8(TYPE II) 2.88 0.00 2.88 0.00 Comb 4.0 5.83 3.12 1.70 5.83 Sag 12.00 0.026 0.026 0.013 0.22 8.49 0.30 8.49 1.0 Off 10 CB 7 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.00 Comb 4.0 2.31 3.12 2.31 1.35 ag 12.00 0.040 0.040 0.013 0.19 4.65 0.27 4.65 1.0 Off 11 YD 2 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 Grate 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 .028 12.00 0.028 0.028 0.013 0.04 1.50 0.08 0.00 1.0 Off 12 YD 3 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 Grate 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 .046 12.00 0.240 0.240 0.013 0.11 0.46 0.08 0.00 1.0 Off 13 Roof(Rainwater T 2.10 0.00 2.10 0.00 Grate 0.0 0.00 3.10 1.55 2.00 Sag 2.00 0.050 0.020 0.013 0.30 12.08 0.30 12.08 0.0 Off Project File: 3300 cb analysis.stm Number of lines:13 Run Date: 10/21/2016 NOTES: Inlet N-Values=0.016;Intensity=54.74/(Inlet time+10.80)^0.80; Return period=10 Yrs.; "Indicates Known Q added. All curb inlets are throat. Storm Sewers 00.50 Appendix D ' Drainage Area Maps Existing Condition Drainage Areas (DA-1) , Catchbasin Watershed Delineation (DA 2) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M// NOTES: ?0 _ couRiE c. "r1Y E BAILEY 1. USDA MAPPING INDICATES THAT THE SOILS WITHIN mGa� COUR/E Uya$,,o�I'6 E BAIL E>' 662. THE WATERSHED AREA CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING SOIL a 2 I F�33 ( )) TYPES: oYm ' �. TELLIES' , S��ILLT`�PEBBOUND;[ F�f9CINE SACO SILT LOAM, HSG 3 $ ( WIN SOR LOAMY SAND,BO D3%SLOPES HSG A `TYPICAL �^ { /27J ) AGAWAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 0-3%SLOPES, HSG B NIF - MAP REFERENCE: =J j PA R. t JUD/TN�I`L I , TELL/ER y , i \ `,-� .-< , �� _ - - EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN g O C._._ \ �\ �\ •.\ - --" I TAKEN FROM PROPERTY&TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR PAUL R. &JUDITH TELLIER, 2045 JOHN FITCH BLVD. SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHSWINDSOR BY '� DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. DATE 12/23/14 SCALE 1"=40' O sr YD-3 t ba adttg CATCHMENT DRAINAGE AREA '" ��_�I PROPOSED DUILTN \ - �9 daR$1 -2 �� t� _ --- za.sio sF roLAL \\ BASIN DEiALS �� �1Fj$ 18,0DQ SF 1ST FLOOR p [ 8'0 Sf AND_FLOOR, H B \ EE !g$ _\ \ FF: 51.00 2 A , TOTAL AREA-022 ACRES \ - - \ \ , LOT 1 HSG: A \ covER _ 2075 JOHN FITCH BOULEVARD \\\\ -�\\ !' (,'RA$$ A:0.03 ACRES {bS,}5 {flttaJ 13.7046 SF AC 36A > YD-1 CRASS HSc B:0.19 ACRESF5 3@£5 e$a \� C-020 a CN-56 V �,1.. Tc-8 MINUTES J >o \ �- TOTAL AREA 001 ACRES y° ROOF _ \ YD 1 `f s S.0. a o. 1 CB-7 YD-2 wwaaewou .rn ACRES o LL % C-0.90 a GIN y o 3 Tc-6 MINUTES -co i It , -.sF-�\ /` V A. `�� - TOTAL AREA-0.10 ACRES N o \ I l \ M CRASS HSG A.0.04 ACRES e YD-3 GRASS HSG B:0.06 ACRES m a o d < % € CB-6 \ c.0.20 a CN-52 I + Tc-8 MINUTES TOTAL AREA-0.35 ACRES 1.8. Q LW 0 o u CB 4 CB-5 GRASS HSGC A 012 ACRES y z F I 'I ' I `-,� 1 08 _ \ - 0 - GB-3 IMPERVIOUS:0.23 ACRES Q Z i r 3 Tc-6 MINUTES m CB-3 O 9J I I I as h m TOTAL AREA-0.13 ACRES u COVER �\\� l A .'� CB-4 �IMPEf2V10US:08ACRESACRES �'-' O `'� >�V 'v. LOT - c.0.63 a w-75 N o 3 J LEVA 206 OHN FITCH (NJ RD Tc-8 MINUTES O \,\ , \ 2 - - - 'q \\\\\\ (SEE NOTE AC - N 88) / ' - TOTAL AREA-0.09 ACRES ' -SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY LINE GovER\\ : .r.\ GRASS HSG A:0.07 ACRES ' ( CB-5 wiPetVlous:6.o�zN�ACRES (TYPICAL) Tc-8 MINUTES I TOTAL AREA-0.39 ACRES I... C13-8 HSG: A HSG:B CRASS HscCAVOW ACRES 01 3 6A - CB-6 GRASS HSc&0.09 ACRES �:->'� - y I 29"A \ :-. IMPHIVIOUS:0.16 ACRES Lu C-0.49 a CN-68 R { Tc-8 MINUTES \\\.\\ \\\-. _ - - - TOTAL AREA-020 ACRES I ' I VAv.'. A - G:. B' D'- .- V - _. I , :'. �- - CRASS HSG BD::0.02 ACRES i. \ ;08 ,; \ - CB 7 IMPERVIOUS:0.18 ACRES �\ LOT 8 ` c-0.e3 a w-95 2045 JOHN FITCH BOULEV RD ��... ;" �' \ ` - Tc-6 MINUTES 26,470 C - (SEE NOTE A�) \� \: - ; \\_ TOTAL AREA-0.97 ACRES 'Q \ W d CB-S CRASS HSG A:0& 28 ACRES Q CRASS HSG 0.18 ACRES GRAVEL DRIVE:0.10 ACRES m Z W IMPERVIOUS:0.41 ACRES S W a c-057 a wazIVIF F- ? R l - J TIN DARCY Tc-8 MINUTES c (VOL. 2/82 PG. l39) � �� TOTAL AREA-0.41 ACRES ROOF covER \ (TO RAINWATER I�ERVKKIS:0.41 ACRES SHEET 1 \ HARVESTING TANK) c.0.90 a CN-9e A _ - - Tc-6 MINUTES DA-2 '! \ j 1 \ �W 1 1 C 1 \ \ \ NOTES: oxo� 1 CA \ 1. USDA MAPPING INDICATES THAT THE SOILS WITHIN6Gsa THE WATERSHED AREA CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING SOIL SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY LINE 1 \ _ \ 1 TYPES: r �3 REV RE UP D 1 /EW RFC , (TYPICAL) m 1 \a,pvc SACO SILT LOAM, HSG B/D 1 /NV.3L72 \"5.6 - I = .5 C \ O \ \ WINDSOR LOAMY SAND, 3%SLOPES HSG A S ORA/NAGE \ \\\\\\\ 1 AGAWAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 0-3%SLOPES, HSG B 55.5 MAP REFERENCE, �, \-sb.2 \ / 1 1 y Lx \\ EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN \ 1.28.5 p / 1\�/ / /P° -{- Qi ' I , \- _ - - 1 TAKEN FROM PROPERTY& TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR PAUL R. &JUDITH TELLIER, 2045 JOHN FITCH BLVD. SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR BY 41 0 I\/ 1 11 ` 1 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. DATE 12/23/14 SCALE 1"=40' u ,54.9, ? 21.7 --- .54.2 \� `\♦ / / a �ii�s \__ rnb_ ,\/l \ \\ ///e���/ 1 F� , ,.I \ 53.8= O oX1 \ 1 CATCHMENT DRAINAGE AREA i' ]I�F[� JJIM VV27/�T �q��\ �// 1 \ \\�-- , �, H :u Ex c 1 1 / 1 1 //� �Or, 7� CE I;l A1111 5L�-as ice- \ ��X(\( / ) \\ \\ -'S4� A 1 ` \ (1 T�.55.51 \ / I\ / �y iy a-, \\\ /2 /NV52.21 1 /NV..5/.4/(ERN$ I / Y� / BAD\ Q C g24 gay Zp9p yii"lyg \\ \T\\ \ y ill 8"PVC \\ 111 \ \ ,// 1 \\ HSG: A \\ 54.6.1 AL�7 2� $B �C$ *E E \ \ INV.-28.0/ .4 \ I Y ' \ �° ,1 \\\ 1\ \ \ , \ ( 36A \ 01 0 ��. 0 e"P✓c \ 1 \ \ I 1 I 1rn g /s° / 1`/NV29.73 \ \ \ I \ \ � x 5 >"-e� �i 1 t I I I v 1 h' RLP L Ex.ce \ TOTAL AREA-Z87 ACRES Lq 65€ g 6 \\ \ \\ L\\ 11 I `\ *53.0 I J =54.61 & 5 EX.Of1N ✓ IN 55/.80(N 1\\� U // COVER ,! I I I l \ M65.67 \ x I/ GRASS H$C B/D:0.35 ACRES T /NV50.87(N65) 1 \ CRASS H$C A:108 ACRES -O v I \ \ l\ 5 Y / i// / %�� - - /S. Y53�I\,l � /NV5/./2(NNJ 1 CRAS$H$G B:0.56 ACRE$ L)>O EXISTING CONDITION OF 1\ ( I / 1 /NV5/.O](NEJ 1 PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA a, I �'� IMPERVIOUS:0.88 ACRES _ O 55.62 y� m0 r 0.45 6 CN-68 $ V u Tc 18.6 tiWUTE$ o i7L $ 49.6. \ RIVE (- /l FLOW 1\ / �!� ' 1/ 1 1 1 1\ 1 \ n-024 (DENSE 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ (oEGRASS)� FN0 -53.6 TC -23.3 I$HALLOWL-C22ONENT CRATED \, 031 oRA/ GE / l �'� / l 1 1 \ S-o. 31 33 - Dirt / I 1 // -54.2 \ 1 r 1 1 xl UNPAVED P^3 S $o < \ 2 2 B�D \ I\ -55.2 PING D _ I N \\ I i IIII 11� c r I I \ --\ 01 55. • 1 1 1 11 X N W o / 1 1 Pnc v 1 1 5r5rEM Z Z o Z 4 4. - �1 \ m \\\\\ \�\\ ^1 \1 \ i \ •50.5 I - \ 1 1 1 11 11 � 1�' LL?i r22/ \\`\\\\\\\\\` Q = q lT/GRAVEL m: \\"44.7 \I I I I \ ! pRIVE 1 1 O V� O In In 1 Ex CB 1 1 \ I 1 �\I / 1 Bv TF.53.95 -SO TYPE , ` N N UMDAR INE! (T_ I CAL)RA 15"RCP \ J� '-� F,54/5 1 \ TF56c R 23.5= l / \ \\\ \\\ 1 ®l 1 =54.25CB J 1 1 D /NV50.3 1 TF-54 \ INV50.3 b V \ \\\•48. \ -' I IVE/NV4q.89.89(NJ 1 I h / \\\ \ \ \ / `'• \ / G gIT-OR, /NV49.84(5EJ 1 1 i 1 ` CUD BENT \\\ \ lJ.U a / h� \\ \\�\ �"• ' '36A RAVEL"54.4 -�_ 4./0 1 pRIVE p � 1 1 1 GRAVEL \5 _ _ '-' / O 1 I 1 \ LL 5Q /SEPTIC .e ND BROK E,M V. 1 sr5TEM I \ 1 1 \ \ / e B � I `_ PAVEMEN 1 33\�\\\\'\\\\\ \ / I 1 i i 11 1 1 I T \ 1\\ \ \\\ \ \ 1 -55.2 ,\ / 153.9 ( 11 1 \ Lu C-m1 1 p z a i 53.8 `-� �- -��' "r�• 1 1 c 1 a a I I I I r 42.2 \ =55.2 0!g,T. \ ,�'` v` 1 1 Q m IIII � � il ( /P - \\ 1 1 1 1 zoo l a coNc MON. ENC14\ MARK ` 1 11 11 K a R E LONG MON EV.= . 54./9 p \ 1 1 1 1 W A \ \ \I 1 1 1 y\ IX. SHEET TF5 DA-1 I I 1 ' Appendix E Existing Condition Hydrographs 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 is Existin 9 Condition of Proposed SubCat Reach POn LjRk Routing Diagram for 3300-Existing Contidion Prepared by Design Professionals Inc., Printed 10/21/2016 FllydroCADO 10.00-16 s/n 09320 0 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC , G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Existing Contidion Type ///24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Runoff = 1.09 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 0.127 af, Depth> 0.53 ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area(ac) CN Description ' 0.350 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D 1.080 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A ' 0.560 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.880 98 Impervious 2.870 65 Weighted Average 1.990 69.34% Pervious Area ' 0.880 30.66% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/f0 (ft/sec) (cfs) 17.3 100 0.0123 0.10 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.20" 1.3 226 0.0310 2.83 Shallow Concentrated Flow, ' Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 18.6 326 Total ' Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Hydrograph 1.09 cfs —Runoff --- - ---1 - T e-111-2411 ' 2 R, ainfall-3.20" Runoff Area-2.870 ac w ;Run off',Volume-0.'127af Runoff Depth>0.53" LL ! Moo Length-326' ' T& 1866 min CN=65 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 1 ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ , 3300 - Existing Contidion Type III 24-hr 10 Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 , HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Runoff = 3.16 cfs @ 12.28 hrs, Volume= 0.315 af, Depth> 1.32" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs , Type III 24-hr 10 Rainfall=4.70" Area (ac) CN Description , 0.350 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D 1.080 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.560 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.880 98 Impervious , 2.870 65 Weighted Average 1.990 69.34% Pervious Area 0.880 30.66% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 17.3 100 0.0123 0.10 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.20" 1.3 226 0.0310 2.83 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps ' 18.6 326 Total Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area ' Hydrograph I i 3.16 cfs —Runoff -- - ---T- --!----T---- ---- 3 i i i - ----: ---- - Type 11t24=hr- t y0 R, ain'fall'A70" Runoff Area=2.87 '0ac --- --- y 2 _ _ --' ------ - - e-- ;af-- ' - --�----, - ,Ru-Hoff VoE m a- 15' 3 Runoff De thA .32" 0 LL ! Plow Length, =326' --- . 1 -- - T--- - --------- Tc=18�6 Min N=65 1 0 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Existing Contdion Type IU 24-hr 25 Rainfall=5.50" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Runoff = 4.47 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.435 af, Depth> 1.82 ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Rainfall=5.50" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.350 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D 1.080 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A ' 0.560 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.880 98 Impervious 2.870 65 Weighted Average 1.990 69.34% Pervious Area ' 0.880 30.66% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 17.3 100 0.0123 0.10 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2=3.20" 1.3 226 0.0310 2.83 Shallow Concentrated Flow, ' Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 18.6 326 Total ' Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Hydrograph 5 4.47 cfs —Runoff --Ype III 24;hr 4 ---- --------- ---- ---- -------- -- ------------ ' 25 RainfallT540" Runoff Area-2.870 ac 3 - --'Runoff VoIume_0.~- - - Runoff DepthA .82" U. 2 --- -- ----; -- -----1--- Fo�nr-L-en -h 326'- Tc=1866 min ---- - ---- J-------- i 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ,7 18 19 20 Time (hours) 1 G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ ' 3300 - Existing Contdion Type 11124-hr 100 Rainfall=6.90" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 ' HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area Runoff = 6.96 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af, Depth> 2.78" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ' Type III 24-hr 100 Rainfall=6.90" Area (ac) CN Description , 0.350 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D 1.080 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.560 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.880 98 Impervious ' 2.870 65 Weighted Average 1.990 69.34% Pervious Area 0.880 30.66% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description -_-(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) ' 17.3 100 0.0123 0.10 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.20" 1.3 226 0.0310 2.83 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps ' 18.6 326 Total Subcatchment 1S: Existing Condition of Proposed Distured Area , Hydrograph -- - --- ---r- ------ --6.96 cfs ;Type III 24hr 6 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- OD-F,tai nfal1*6 1W"- 1 --- - --Runoff Area=2.87-0-ac_ o ;Runoff Volume=0465;of --- Ruhoff-Deptha2:781 -- ��77�� , ----- - � FaOW-Lets fa=326--- ' Tc�1866 Min 2 -------- --- ----- ------------------ --- ---- --- CN- 5 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' Appendix F Proposed Condition Hydrouaphs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3S 4S 5S 6S (7S 1 YD-3 CB-3 CB 4 CB-5 CB-6 ' $S, 1 CB-7 , 2S ' 11L 9S YD-2 Discharge to Wetlands CB-8 1S ' 1 10S YD-1 ' ROOF (TO RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK) , StabCat Reach Ott Ljrt{C Routing Diagram for 3300-Proposed Condition Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. , Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type///24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: YD-1 Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.005 af, Depth> 0.29" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.030 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.190 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B ' 0.220 58 Weighted Average 0.220 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 1S: YD-1 Hydrograph 0.042 -- ------- ---- --------- 0.04cfs --- -- -- - ---- --- _Runoff ' .038 --- --- - -7- - --- -- --- - - - -- _--- - 0.038 -, ---- -' ---!----r ------ r--- --- r--- - 0.036 -------- r ---- 111 24;tir 0.034 r r---,- � � -- ----- -- - ---- ---- 2-Rainfall' n ' 0.032 -- =--- ---- =--- --------- - - ----RunOf#-Ar@ 0. -0 ., ---- --------L- 0.026 --_- ---- _--- Runoff=Y_olume-0�00�of 0 w .024 --- --- ----=---- -------- --- 1 -- -- -- --- RUnoffi D6 tl»f�. 3 .----=-------- - --- -- - --- 9'v ° -------- --- --- - - ---Tc-810-t �rr 0.02 ---1------------ --- -- -- -- .018 0.016 - - - 0.014 -- �---- - - - , 0.012 ----' - ---- -----r ----, --- 0. ' .001 -------- -------- ---- ---- ---- I---- ------ - ------ ---- 0.008 --- - --- ---— ---' ---' ' ---- ----' --------------- --------- 0.002 ----'- -----'- ---------'---- ---- - -----------------',--------'- 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ , 3300 - Proposed Condition Type ///24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 ' HydroCAD@ 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: YD-2 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth> 2.77" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs , Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Area (ac) CN Description ' 0.010 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.010 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: YD-2 ' Hydrograph 0.032 --- ------------ ---- - 0.03cfs -'---- ---- --- ----Y------------- —Runoff 0.03 ----,---- ----',--- ------------- - - ------------ ---------- -------------------Type-111-2,4ahr- --- - - --- --- -2-Rainfall-3.20'- 0.024 --------;- --- ---- ----- - --------- -------- --------r---- r - 0.022 ---- --; -- ----- ------ -- ----l unoff_are4=0.010 c_ 0.02 -- - - RU nflff V-o1=e-0.002 , ---- - P - F- c 0.016 - --- J---- --- --------- --- __ Runoff D� th��. LL 0.014 - --- ---- ----r----,---- ------ -- ---- --- 0-:In-- ----� --- --- --- r ------- �,p 0.01 -----------------'- - -------- ---- ---- 0.008 -- ,----r-------- ---- -- --- - -- ----Ir--- ----r--------,----I t 0.006 ----------------- - --- -- - - ---- ------------------I---- ---- 0.004 ---------- ---- --- ----;- r- 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type 11124-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD(9 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 49 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: YD-3 ' Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, DeP th> 0.14" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.040 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.060 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B ' 0.100 52 Weighted Average 0.100 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 3S: YD-3 Hydrograph 0.005 -------- ----,---- ---------,------------- --------- -------------'---- 0.00 cfs —Runoff 0.005 --- ------- � --TYpe_III L24-hr -. -- --- 0.004 --------;--- ---- ---�---�----I- ------ --------I r � 2 Raihfall=3.20" Runoff area=0.100 ac 0.003 - ----- Runoff, Volume-0.001 of -------- -- -- -- Ru --- f tft -- nod , G,GA LL 0.002 - '- --:---- -- -- - - ---- I--- --- Ij �c� ',_0I�n 0.002 -- ---- -------- 0.001 ---- 0.001 ---' ----'- - --= ----------- ---- --- I 0.000 ------- --- -- --- -- T 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ t 3300 - Proposed Condition Type///24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 ' HydroCAD@ 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 50 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: CB-3 Runoff = 0.47 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth> 1.17" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs , Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Area(ac) CN Description ' 0.120 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.230 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.350 78 Weighted Average 0.120 34.29% Pervious Area ' 0.230 65.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description , (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4S: CB-3 ' Hydrograph 0.52 --- ------ ----------------- - -- ----;---------,---- ------- --- -- 0.5 ---- ---- -- -- - ----=--- -- --- ----r---- —Runoff 0.48 --; ---=--- _ ----- 0.46 ----- -_-_--_-_r_-_--__ I ------- 0.44 - --- I ------ - ' ----i'----------------rfi- -"----I-I -- - --- -------- --- ---- --=- ' N - --- ---- 1 -- , -l- -- 0.4 - ______ _________ ;____ __ 2-Rainfa1110-"0 - 0.36 ---- = _ _ 0.34 --- `- - -- -- - Rurwff-Area=0.-350-c1c 0.32 -------- ---------- --------- --- ----- - ---------- --- ' 3 ' - - --------------0--.-0--3---4-- -a-'#-r=- ---0.3 ----- - Unoff-Volte --- - r0.28 - ----- = ---- ---- ---- -0.26 -�-%hof-DethA17 ___ - --- - - 0.22 ---- -- min Q-- -- --=TC=80.2 ---- -- -- -- --- - -- -- - 0.18 ---- - -------- - -- -------- 0.16 ------------—----------------- ---- -------- ----DN=_�-8-- -- - , 0.12 ---- +---- ----- ---- ---- -- ------ ;---- ---- ---- ' 0.1 -------- --------- r---- ------ - ,--- ------------------ -- - --- 0.08 ----- --- ----L---J---- - ----- 0.06 ------------- - ---------r-- ----- ---- ------ 0.04 --------i---- -------- ---- , --------J----' --- ---- --- -------- 0.02 -------- ---- --- - --- -- --- r---- 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type ///24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD010.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 51 ' Summary for Subcatchment 5S: CB-4 Runoff = 0.15 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.011 af, Depth> 1.00" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.050 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.080 98 IMPERVIOUS ' 0.130 75 Weighted Average 0.050 38.46% Pervious Area 0.080 61.54% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: CB-4 Hydrograph 0.15 - -- _ _ 0.15 cfs _ —Runoff 0.14 ---------- -- --------!-------- --------------------------- - -------- ----TYpeIII24;1�r- 0.13 -- --- --- - --- --- -2-Rain;fall..,- -- 0.11 ------------- --------- -- - Run-off-Area4-1 0.1 ---- ---------,--- ------------- - -----,- - Ruhioff 0.09 ---- ---- ---- ---- - -- olum6-00bi1 ',af-- 0.08 - --- - - ----- --- - -- �IR-U Koff-Depth>-1 :00"-- 0.07 - - +---- ---- - --- --- - -- --- TC=8.0 min LL 0.06 --_-_I --- - ---- - - � ____ -- -- 0.05 -------- ---- ---- ------------- -- -- ---— =75-- ' 0.04 --- - -- =--- ---- -- - ------ - - -- --- ---- 0.03 --- ---- -- ---- ---- -- -- - --- --- ---- 0.02 --- ----'- --------'--- -'---- -----'-- ------ - ---- --- -- -- - --- --- -------- ,---- 0.01 � �- ---i - , 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ t 3300- Proposed Condition Type 111 24-hr 2 Rainfal1=3.20" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 , HydroCADO 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 52 Summary for Subcatchment 6S: CB-5 Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth> 0.14" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ' Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Area (ac) CN Description ' 0.070 39 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.020 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.090 52 Weighted Average 0.070 77.78% Pervious Area ' 0.020 22.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description , (min) (feet) (ft/f0 (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 6S: CB-5 ' Hydrograph ---- -------- ---- --- ---- -- ---- ----'--- --------- ---- ---'--- ----- --- ---- --- --- --- 0.005 �- � --- O.00cfs' � ---�-=---r r----;----'---- —Runoff --- - T e�A 0.004 -------------I---- --- - --J------------- -r�pe_�N_L'# _ --- -- -- --- ---- 0.004 -------- -- -------- ----r -- ----L-- ----- ----r - hf 0 0.003 ----!--- ---- I --' '----Run ff-Ar@a 0�90ac 0.003 --- -----= - - --'--- -----_---- ---- ---- N -- - -- -- -- � - -------- -me-0-001=af w 0.003 - ----- r--- ---- -- 0.003 noff RUnoff Depth 0.14,E 00.002 --------• ---- ----- --- --- --- ---- --- --- - -- 0.002 ---- ,--- 1= _---- Tc=8, -miry- ■ 0.002 --- ------------------ J----- -- --- --- --- - - - ■ 0.002 ----:---- ---- ------------- ,--- --- ----h�=,�ef.- 0.002 --------------- ---- ------- -------- --- - V -- -- - --- --- ----,----, - 0.001 -------- ----- ------ --------LL--- J -------- -- 0.001 ---J---- ----I---- ----'--- ---- ----'---- -------- ---- --- 0.001 --------------------- - -- -- - ----- -------- ---- 0.001 --- 0.000 --------r-------- ---- 0 ;---------------------- --- ----r----r--- ---- ' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 1 G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type 11124-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 53 Summary for Subcatchment 7S: CB-6 Runoff = 0.26 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Depth> 0.66" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.090 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.160 98 IMPERVIOUS ' 0.390 68 Weighted Average 0.230 58.97% Pervious Area 0.160 41.03% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) ' 8.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 7S: CB-6 ' 0.26 raph 0.28 ----- ---- ----- -------, Y rog ---- , cfs -- -----'- '-0.26 ---------------------- -------- --- ------------- --------}---- ---- Y 1 --- -------- ' --- ---- 30.22 -------- - , --- - -2-Rainfall -20 :- - ---- --- - - - cRand rea--- ----- -;---- - -Runoff`Volum6-flJ0Z1'af-_ -- fthof# th>0.6 LL 0.,2 . - -- - - -- 1'Ta m- 0.1 -------- , ------ -- --- - --------------------------- 1 --------=--- --- ---- --------- -- ------------------ ---- N-!68-- 0.02 -- 0 ' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ ' 3300 - Proposed Condition Type ///24-hr 2 Ralnfall=3.20" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 54 Summary for Subcatchment 8S: CB-7 Runoff = 0.57 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.042 af, Depth> 2.50" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Area(ac) CN Description ' 0.020 71 Good Grass, HSG B/D 0.180 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.200 95 Weighted Average ' 0.020 10.00% Pervious Area 0.180 90.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' - _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 8S: CB-7 ' Hydrograph 0.6 -------- ---------'��---------�- 0.57cfs --------------�-------------�--- —Runoff ----- ------- - T-- - 0.5 - -- - �- - - --- --- - ---- --- ---- - Rain;-- --2 --- � __ _-- _-_--2__ ain,fall_3. �0" -' - -- -- ----- -----I--- - 0.45 ----I---- . T--- T--- ----- Runoff Area-.0.200 ac 0.4 -------- ---- --- ----1---- --- --------I---- ---- -------- (�----+---- 6 _Rur>lff o__ m_-010ol . -42af__� y I I I I VolI _ ---? 0 0.3 --- ---- -I---- - ---- --- uaf#' Deb#h2.5D I T m�M 0.25 ----I ILL I I I , ----'I------ /1 /„� I 0.2 --- ---- --- ---------;----I --- - ------------------------ GN-95-- I 0.15 ----I ,----_------ ------ -------------, ---- � I I I I I I I 0.1 --- --------- ------------- - --- -+---- ---+---- ----I---- ---- ---- � I I i II I II I � II I II 0.05 -------- ----'--------- ---- -- ---- - --I--------- ----'---- '---- ---- �� 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type/1/24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 55 ' Summary for Subcatchment 9S: CB-8 Runoff = 0.89 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Depth> 0.84" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.280 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.180 61 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG B ' 0.100 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 0.410 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.970 72 Weighted Average 0.560 57.73% Pervious Area ' 0.410 42.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ' (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 9S: CB-8 Hydrograph 0.95 ------ --------- -I 0.89efs - ----' --- -----------' —Runoff ' 0.9 --- ---- -- - - -- --- 0.85 -- --- -- -- -- - -- ---- --- - Type 124;hr- 0.75 - 7----,----- � ---� ; --------------:-3-Ra1n;faIIT3 20"--' ---- ---- 0.65 - ------------' --- --- T--- - Runoff-Area.' 0:970-ac- ' 0.6 I ;-- ---------+ ---u--p-----f----J--�- -Ir--m--e--=0.55 --- - - --- '- ---a-f--- .45 1 -r y - 1� — pth08 LL0 ---------- - - - - -- - --- -- . --- - - - 0.4 - --- ---- --- -- -- - -I ---- I-------T--V-=--B- V 0.35 ----I- - ---- - = ------- --- ---- ----L--- -- --0.3 -7-2- --- I------------1--------IL ------------------1I --------,--- ------- -1I ----- ----JII ------I -------0.25 0.2 ------------- ---- ----- --------------------'----------- -----I ---------- --- ---- -- 0.1 -- - - 0.05 ---- --------- 0 --;-- -------- - -I 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 1 G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ ' 3300 - Proposed Condition Type /I/24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 ' HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 56 Summary for Subcatchment 10S: ROOF (TO RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK) Runoff = 1.24 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth> 2.77" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ' Type III 24-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" Area(ac) CN Description ' 0.410 98 IMPERVIOUS 0.410 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description t (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 10S: ROOF (TO RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK) 1 Hydrograph � I � 1 1.24 cfs I II ; � —Runoff IType III 24;hr --- 2_RaihfallT3.20' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I Runoff Area=0.410 ac w ;Runoff IIIVoliume-0.095!of I I I Runoff Deptha2.77" LL T6I _6.0 ra I I ' in I I I I I I CN=98 -I II I I � II II 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type 11124-hr 2 Rainfall=3.20" ' Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 57 Summary for Link 11 L: Discharge to Wetlands ' Inflow Area= 2.870 ac 52.26% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.17" for 2 even t Inflow = 3.57 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.281 of ' Primary = 3.57 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.281 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ' Link 11 L: Discharge to Wetlands 4 Hydrograph 3.57 cfs , ', � —Inflow —Primary Inflow Area=2.870 ac -------- --- -- -- -- --- -- - --- -- -- ------- 3 -r- -i-- - - -*- -i-- --- 2 ---- ----=---- ---- --- --- - -- ----------------------,--------- U- r 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ' Time (hours) G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ , 3300 - Proposed Condition Type III 24-hr 10 Rainfall=4.70" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 , HydroCADO 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Link 11 L: Discharge to Wetlands Hydrograph ' ___ -'- 6.87 cfs Inflow 7 - - - ---- —Primary Inflow!ArOa=2.870 OC 6 ----I----T---- -------- ---- ---- --- --- ----r ----r--- 5- --------+---- ---- T--------- -------- --------- -------- .----r---- .v. 4 --------1-------------------'---- ---- ----------'--- ----------------- LL i i 3 -------- -------------=-------- - ----------------T---- - ------------- 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ' Time (hours) 1 1 1 1 1 ' G:\jobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ 3300 - Proposed Condition Type ///24-hr 25 Rainfall=5.50" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-16 s/n 09320 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 ' Link 11 L: Discharge to Wetlands Hydrograph ---=--- —Inflow - ---I --- ' ' � 8.88 ofs _ ' 9 -- - - --'- --- --_ - -- —Primary 8 -- ---- - -------- ---- --- Ia#ao Ar_ a,2.8Q c__. -------- ------------- ' --------- --- ' ---- ---------------------- s ---- ---- ---- --------- -- -----,---- --------- ' ---- 5 -------—---- - ----------- ---- --------- --------r - ------- -------- c --------+ ---r--------- ---- --- ----+----�--- --- ----------- ------ 3 - �, 2 --I---- -'---- --- -- --- -'--------------------------- ----- ' 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) GAjobs\3300\Storm Drainage\HydroCAD\ ' 3300 - Proposed Condition Type III 24-hr 100 Rainfall=6.90" Prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Printed 10/21/2016 ' HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 09320 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 15 Link 11 L: Discharge to Wetlands Hydrograph ' 13 -- --- -- 12.33cfs - -= --- --- ---! -J- -Inflow —Primary ' I'nftow r070 PC 10 0 4 ---------------------- -------- -- - ---- ---------;---- --- - ------- 3 ---- -- ---- ----------,---- ------------- 2 --------;---- ------- - ------- ---------- ---- -----'---- ------------ , , 0 ' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 1 1 1 1 Appendix G 1 Temporary Sediment Trap Sizing 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SETTLING TRAP#1 BOTTOM OF TRAP(WET POOL)=ELEV A 46.5 , TOP OF WET POOL=ELEV B 49.5 WEIR CREST(TOP OF WET POOL)=ELEV C 51.5 TOP OF TRAP= ELEV D 52.5 , AREA DRAINING TO TRAP IN ACRES 1.2 STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 4450.1 Vw=WETS STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 2225.1 ' Vd =DRY STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 2225.1 Dw= DEPTH OF WET POOL IN FT(3' MAX) 3.0 Aw=SURFACE AREA ELEV B(MIN) IN SF 872.6 ' MIN REQ. DIA. OF TRAP AT ELEV B IN FT 33.3 Dd = DEPTH OF WET POOL IN FT 2.0 ' Ad =SURFACE AREA AT ELEV C(MIN) IN SF 1352.5 MIN REQ. DIA. OF TRAP AT ELEV C IN FT 41.5 REFER TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP(TST)DETAIL ' AND FIGURE TST-1 SEE SHEET ES2.TST SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE ' PURPOSES ONLY.SHAPE,VOLUMES AND DEPTHS CAN VARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAUD DETAILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN APPROPRIATE ' LOCATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE CURRENT SITE ACTIVITIES AND PHASING. IN NO CASE SHALL THE AREA DRAINING TO A TSTS EXCEED 5 ACRES.SHOULD ' TEMPORARY SETTLING TRAP#2 ' BOTTOM OF TRAP(WET POOL)=ELEV A 47.5 TOP OF WET POOL=ELEV B 50.5 WEIR CREST(TOP OF WET POOL)=ELEV C 52.5 ' TOP OF TRAP=ELEV D 53.5 AREA DRAINING TO TRAP IN ACRES 1.8 STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 6367.7 Vw=WETS STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 3183.8 Vd =DRY STORAGE REQUIRED IN CF 3183.8 Dw=DEPTH OF WET POOL IN FT(T MAX) 3.0 ' Aw=SURFACE AREA ELEV B(MIN) IN SF 1248.E MIN REQ. DIA. OF TRAP AT ELEV B IN FT 39.9 Dd=DEPTH OF WET POOL IN FT 2.0 ' Ad=SURFACE AREA AT ELEV C(MIN) IN SF 1935.3 MIN REQ. DIA. OF TRAP AT ELEV C IN FT 49.7 ' REFER TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP(TST)DETAIL AND FIGURE TST-1 SEE SHEET ES2.TST SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE ' PURPOSES ONLY.SHAPE,VOLUMES AND DEPTHS CAN VARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAUD DETAILS. ' CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE CURRENT SITE ACTIVITIES AND PHASING.IN NO CASE SHALL THE ' AREA DRAINING TO A TSTS EXCEED 5 ACRES.SHOULD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE AN SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:860.291.875 7 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, Of Rhode Island LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Michele Lipe Date: 11/10/2016 DPI Project No. 3300 Town of South Windsor Re: STAR Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ® Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • • • • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 10 11/10/16 11x17 revised color building elevations 1 11/10/16 letter regarding response to first hearing comments These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ ForApproval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ® For review and comment ❑ Forbids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: SIGNED: CC: Be in P.Wheeler, PLA P.O. BOX 1 167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island • November 10,2016 Ms.Michele Lipe Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: S.T.A.R.Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard Dear Ms.Lipe: At the Planning&Zoning Commission hearing on October 25,2016 for the above referenced application,several issues were raised by Town Staff and Commission members that we hope to address with this letter. First,a question was raised regarding the processing and selling of firewood on the site. The Applicant has indicated to Design Professionals that they will continue to process and sell the firewood that is currently on site. Once that is finished,they will stop the firewood operation altogether. Based on the amount of firewood they currently have,the expectation is this will be completed before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. If,for • some reason this is not the case,the applicant understands they will have to apply for a Temporary and Conditional Permit from the Planning&Zoning Commission in order to continue the operation past the opening of the new building. Second,there was discussion regarding the construction and farm equipment that is currently stored on site. The applicant has indicated that over half of the equipment is not related to the farming operation and will be removed from the site prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. The remaining equipment will be stored in a new structure that will be placed on the house lot at 2045 John Fitch Boulevard(proposed Lot 3). This new structure will require a separate application prior to construction,and will conform to zoning requirements. Based on current Lot Coverage calculations,there is enough available building area to allow for a structure of sufficient size to store the remaining equipment. Lastly,there were concerns with the aesthetics of the building,specifically the rooftop mechanical units and the fagade facing Route 5. Capital Studio Architects and Aldrich Construction are working on solutions to both items that will be presented at the upcoming hearing on November 15,2016. Thank you for your assistance in working toward an approval for this application. Sincerely, DESIGNPROFESSIONALS, INC. • enjamin P. Wheeler,PLA Director of Operations Cc: Bill Tellier O d � �w,1 NI! x1 { h cif i�� ypp �pyfll�pqpq{NNIII��t� 1(I� {{{ �� I I{ �i���� �u►i IfpNp � . ., ��N�I� OIIIi011lipllnnil�l) ���� fl�il NnNlll ItI��I pi'nlfl«■IIhy�ll���!91'II {II�IlI 'Ity yp h 11111101 r''�:'I err■ HHHOR a • I 0 0 © o 0 0 ® iIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIiIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIhlllllllllllll IIIIIIIII IIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIiI111Nllll _ ; 4 IIIIIIIIIIIINNIINNIIIINIIIIfIINIII111111N1111 4��,`�f � � 19111 PIIIIII�IUNiII ql� � yye� (J I IIIIII����� �IIIIINIIIIII�I NI _.,.. a.�N.a>l�iAf�11/111�C1�������� t��A1111111111�1�91 � nneni�n I J mil � = _■' mihi ilia II y�o ICI l fi pail 11 U! I I U (III �II� p�lll L„I fill II I I I II I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I o m m I q 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I N N I 1 I cl�`; W N N l 1 I N I cn � 1 (0 n � cn cn 1 I (C) I m IF 1 m 1 I m I �i m m I �� m I c� m (D I 0 1 0 0 < 0 1 o I o I :3 :3 1 I I co 1 N I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I � I I I I I W N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m Sight Line Elevations #: DATE: REVISION: D v Aldrich Construction m w Company Inc. Star Center N 1395 Tolland Turnpike 2045 John Fitch Blvd. Manchester Connecticut 06042-1632 South Windsor,Connecticut 860.647.7544 ODED 2/A2 / �• EXlS71NC / � I LAND NpUSE O REVIEW AREA )1 ( Trees SHED 04 PROPOSED BUILDING / p 30,000 SF TOTAL / )24,000 RECREATION FACILITY I 2 c N 6,000 SF MEZZANINE + Y o FF: 51.00 C C n o Jj 3/A2 0 a E / 6 C� . - - o 0 O� c Lii T ® l \ OF a e°sae WE TL A NDS / \ oil \ 1— m \ 1/A2 I � � T /�� / \ � cc 0 0 „c �., --- -------- \ (f} o w 0 --1 �pTiC Cn SYSTEM m H o �R \ BROKEN rfNcc EB DRO Scale:1"=60' B/TIGRA VEC HOUSE bz �pN DATE: 11/11/16 SHEET Site Plan A-1 A-� Scale: 1 " = 60' Site Plan r Appl #16-51P, Star Center Subdivision/Special Exception Site Plan Public Hearing 10/25/16 1. Request for a three lot subdivision of 4.9 acres to create one new lot; request for Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 and Site Plan of Development for a 24,810 sf recreational facility on Lot #3, on property located at 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard (westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor Town Line), A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay Zone i ;-P 'Zv u 2. This is the project to come in under the new Route 5 North Overlay zone. The sated purpose for this new zone is, "to create a transitional overlay zone....to establish certain commercial uses compatible with the remaining residential uses, while carefully managing building design, placement, and landscape treatments in this high volume traffic corridor along U.S. Route 5". The regulations also provides for some general concepts to guide applicants in their designs. A copy of the regulations is being provided for your reference. 3. The applicant is proposing to create one new commercial lot and to reconfigure the two existing residential house lots in conformance with A-20 residential regulations. 4. The new commercial lot will be 3.7 acres. Minimum lot size required for the new commercial lot is 30,000 sf. With 150 feet of road frontage. The setbacks for this new lot are 50 fy setback and 10 feet for sy setbacks. The applicant has noted that lot 1 and2 are residential lots and would need to be combined in the future if they were to be developed as commercial lots. 5. The Planning Department notified CRCOG as required under state statutes for a subdivision within 500 feet of a town line, with the following response: READ CRCOG MEMO 6. Accompanying the subdivision application is a request for Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 and Site Plan of Development for a 24,810 sf recreational facility on Lot #3. Special exception criteria includes: • The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan of Conservation and Development. • The application has met the requirements of the zoning regulations. • The land is physically suited to the proposed use. • Minimal, if any, adverse environmental impacts are created. • No traffic or other hazards will be created. • The impacts on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities, street, drainage systems, sidewalks, and other elements of the infrastructure will be minimal. • There will be minimal or no adverse effects on existing uses in the area. • Surrounding property values will be conserved. • The character of the neighborhood will be maintained or minimally disrupted. • The general welfare of the community will be served. • There is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community needs. • Historic factors are adequately protected; or due consideration to preservation of historic factors has been demonstrated. • The overall physical appearance of the proposed development is compatible with surrounding development and the Commission's goals for the neighborhood/corridor. • The architectural design is aesthetically pleasing and blends well into the surrounding area. The Commission may impose additional conditions in accordance with these regulations in order to ensure that all applicable criteria enumerated above and/or within a particular use category are satisfied. 7. The intent of this facility is to be a practice for a variety of possible sports. There is no intent to hold special events or competitions at this location. 8. Proposed hours of operation for the facility are M - TH 7 am— 1 OPM, and weekend and holidays are 7 am—midnight. 9. Impervious coverage is proposed as 38.6%; 50% maximum. The parking requirement for this recreation use is 100 spaces. The applicant has provided 93 spaces and have requested a modification in accordance with Section 6.4.9. This allows the PZC to reduce the number required when demonstrated that: • The increase in stormwater run-off rate shall be held to a minimum by reducing the parking spaces, and/or • The applicant demonstrates through actual experience that a lesser number of parking spaces will suffice, and further that due to the nature of the building or business, future owners/occupants of the building are also unlikely to need to number of parking spaces required by the zoning regulations. 10. This property borders residentially single family houses both to the north and south. The applicant has proposed a ten foot wide arborvitae screening along the property boundary to the north and along the parking areas behind the existing family houses. 11. Landscaping is also proposed in the parking areas meeting our landscaping requirements 12. The applicant was in front of the ADRC on two occasions. The Committee had concerns with the scale and street side presence of the initial building. When the applicant returned with the current design, the board appreciated the effort that had been made, however had hoped more design would have been incorporated into the elevation. At the time of the presentation to ADRC, it was represented that the rooftop mechanical equipment would be incorporated into the interior of the building. The revised plans received today show two units facing south and will be very visible form the public road. I think this does meet the intent of: Section 5.8.5 Site Appearance and Performance Standards 1) Existing trees and hedgerows shall be incorporated into site design and preserved to the maximum extent possible. 2) All parking areas shall be a minimum of 25 feet from the front property line. 3) Side and rear yards shall contain landscaped buffers of 10 feet in width. The provision of Section 6.2.4 Buffers shall not apply. 4� All outdoor storage must conform to Section 2.11. Commercial and Industrial Storage and Display. )' Loading areas,truck parking, HVAC equipment, outdoor storage areas,trash collection areas and other such service functions shall be incorporated into the overall design of the site and landscaping so that the visual impacts and noise on surrounding residential properties are minimized. and would request the applicant address this change in a revised elevation. Lighting consists of both pole lights as well as building mounted lights. The parking lot �� lights will be 25 feet high. The lighting will be on a timer and reduced after the close of the facility. l The applicant would be entitled to both a free standing sign as well as building signage. 1A. There are regulated wetlands and 100 year floodplain on the property. The applicant received IWA/CC approval on 9/21/16, with a $20,000 bond for erosion and sedimentation measures and $25,000 for the installation of stormwater structures, and $10,000 for slope plantings for stabilization of the slope. 16. South Windsor Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no comments at this time. 17. Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and satisfied with the changes that have been made. f)g,, The site will be serviced by public water and septic systems. Heather Oatis, Town Sanitarian has reviewed the septic designs. - ���� _ 110 �h S,�v&✓ �-e a ve,,� 19. Lastly, this site is currently the home of the Tellier Christmas Tree Farm. Easements are proposed to be able to continue to allow for access down to the trees. 20. Currently there is a significant amount of equipment being stored on the sit in the area of the new parking lot for the commercial use. With the subdivision of the lot into two V2 residential lot and one commercial lot, all of the outdoor farming equipment will have to be relocated onto farmland. We would request an approval condition that this occur prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the commercial facility. DU 41A �- ��y1N Sf4 - Y 9 � • �� 70� olle siolu� ?d&U&Olt 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 r�OSOR.CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 1570 0000 6337 2300 November 18,2016 Tellier Properties, LLC Paul R. and Judith M. Tellier 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tellier: Re: Appl. 16-51P, S.T.A.R. Center Subdivision, 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on November 15, 2016 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a three lot subdivision of 4.9 acres to create one new lot, on property located at 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard (westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor town line), A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay zone. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for three (3) lots,numbered 1 - 3. 2. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer: 3. All lots shall be serviced by septic system and are subject to the approval of the Town Sanitarian. 4. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 5. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission. 6. Prior to commencement of any site work, a preconstruction meeting must be held with Town Staff. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. All easements for conservation purposes,drainage or utilities,that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 9. Septic system must be submitted to and approved by the Environmental Health Officer prior to filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. 10. If,for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed,the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding. All bonds shall conform to the enclosed bond policy and shall be posted prior to filing the final plans.in the Town Clerk's office. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development.If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date,the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. 12. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$50.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 13. The Town Engineer's review comments dated 10/14/16 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 14. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. Black and white transparent mylars of the sheets CS-1 and CS-2 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans with live signatures and raised seals must be submitted to this Commission to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission,they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, Gary Bazzano, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission GB/llz cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. tOW N St4 Q Tov� ale slou� ?d&uaot a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE a SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 r�Osox•co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 1570 0000 6337 2300 November 18,2016 Tellier Properties,LLC Paul R. and Judith M. Tellier 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tellier: Re: Appl. 16-51P, S.T.A.R. Center Special Exception and Site Plan of Development, 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on November 15, 2016 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 and a Site Plan of Development. This approval is to create a 24, 810 sf recreational facility on Lot#3, on property located on the westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor town line, A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay Zone as shown on plans prepared by the Design Professionals,, Inc., Project #3300, dated September 6, 2016 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including bonds in the amount of $20,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, $25,000 for installation of stormwater structures and$10,000 for slope plantings and stabilization plantings 4. A landscape bond in the amount of$7,000 is required and must be submitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy if work is not completed. 5. All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 9.1.3 of the Zoning Regulations. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. This approval does not constitute approval of the septic system,which can only be granted by the Town Sanitarian. 9. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11. All free standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12. If a State Traffic Commission certificate is required, no building permits will be issued until the certificate has been issued(per CGS §14-311). 13. Engineering comments dated 10/14/16 must be incorporated into the final plans. 14. The fire wood business shall cease prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the new commercial building. 15. No outdoor storage of material and equipment is approved on the commercial lot. All of the farming equipment associated with the tree farm shall no longer be stored on the single family house lots or commercial building lot other than in permitted accessory structures. 16. Hours of operation are limited to Monday through Thursday 7 a.m. — 10 p.m., and Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and holidays 7 a.m. to midnight. 17. In accordance with Section 6.4.9,the Commission has granted a modification to the required number of parking spaces based on the uses presented, allowing 93 spaces. 18. Roof top mechanical units shall be painted to match the existing roof. Once installed,the units will be evaluated to determine if additional screening will be required. 19.No outdoor storage of material is approved. All the farming equipment associated with the tree farm shall no longer be stored outdoors on the single family house lots or commercial building lot. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet CL-1 and CG-1 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans as revised must be submitted to this Commission. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylar has been signed by the Commission, it will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. Sincerely, Gary Bazzano, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Enclosure GB/llz cc: Town Engineer Fire Marshal Health Department The Special Exception will take effect upon filing of this form. I, Gary Bazzano, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission, hereby certify that on November 15, 2016 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to the Town of South Windsor a Special Exception to Table 5.8.4.B.5 of the Zoning Regulations to create a 24, 810 sf recreational facility on Lot#3, on property located at 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard(westerly side of John Fitch Boulevard, southerly of East Windsor town line), A-20 and Route 5 North Overlay Zone as shown on plans prepared by the Design Professionals, Inc.,Project#3300, dated September 6, 2016 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including bonds in the amount of $20,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, $25,000 for installation of stormwater structures and$10,000 for slope plantings and stabilization plantings 4. A landscape bond in the amount of$7,000 is required and must be submitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy if work is not completed. 5. All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 9.1.3 of the Zoning Regulations. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. This approval does not constitute approval of the septic system,which can only be granted by the Town Sanitarian. 9. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11. All free standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12. If a State Traffic Commission certificate is required, no building permits will be issued until the certificate has been issued (per CGS §14-311). 13. Engineering comments dated 10/14/16 must be incorporated into the final plans. 14. The fire wood business shall cease prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the new commercial building. 15. No outdoor storage of material and equipment is approved on the commercial lot. All of the farming equipment associated with the tree farm shall no longer be stored on the single family house lots or commercial building lot other than in permitted accessory structures. 16. Hours of operation are limited to Monday through Thursday 7 a.m. — 10 p.m., and Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and holidays 7 a.m. to midnight. 17. In accordance with Section 6.4.9,the Commission has granted a modification to the required number of parking spaces based on the uses presented, allowing 93 spaces. 18. Roof top mechanical units shall be painted to match the existing roof. Once installed,the units will be evaluated to determine if additional screening will be required. 19. No outdoor storage of material is approved. All the farming equipment associated with the tree farm shall no longer be stored outdoors on the single family house lots or commercial building lot. GIS Pin 47702045& 47702063 Property Description: A certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford, State of Connecticut as shown on the map referenced Subdivision& Easement Plan S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, Connecticut Prepared for Tellier Properties, LLC Date:09/06/2016 Scale 1"=30'Sheet CS-1 Sheet 3 of 15. Piece or parcel of land more particularly described and bounded as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5), said point being the southeasterly property corner of land now or formerly Courie C.&Amy E. Bailey; Thence S13°08'17"E along the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5)a distance of 141.51 feet to a point; Thence S13°08'20"E along the westerly street line of John Fitch Boulevard (US Route 5) a distance of 68.10 feet to a point being the northeasterly property corner of now or formerly Lot 2; Thence S76°51'43"W along the northerly property line of now or formerly Lot 2 a distance of 182.77 feet to a point; Thence 513*32'28"E along the westerly property line of now or formerly Lot 2 a distance of 122.93 feet to a point being the northwesterly property corner of now or formerly Lot 3; Thence S13°32'28"E along the westerly property line of land now or formerly Lot 3 a distance of 128.61 feet to a point in the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy; Thence N89°37'35"W-along the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy a distance of 74.97 feet to a concrete monument; Thence N45°20'19"W along the northerly property line of land now or formerly Justin Darcy a distance of 660.16 feet to a concrete monument being the southwesterly corner of now or formerly Parcel A; Thence N88045'24"E along the southerly property line of now or formerly Parcel A a distance of 322.18 feet to a point being the southwesterly property corner of land now or formerly Courie C. &Amy E. Bailey; Thence N86°21'36"E along the.southerly property line of land now or formerly Courie C. &Amy. E Bailey a distance of 294.45 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said parcel contains 161,338 SF or 3.704 acres. OWNER OF RECORD: Paul R. &Judith M. Tellier and Tellier Farm LLC Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 18t'day of November 2016. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Chairman Gary Bazzano,&Iam�fi�g&�Zoning Commission Received for record this day of , 200 at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: 4 p.NN Sf4 C� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SoR-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 February 21, 2017 William P. Tellier 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Tellier: Re: Appl. 16-51P, S.T.A.R. Center Subdivision, 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on February 14, 2017 to grant two 90 day extensions for filing subdivision plans for the above-referenced subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The original filing deadline was March 4, 2017 and the new filing deadline is August 31, 2017. Sincerely, Gary Bazzano, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission GB/llz GOWN Sf4 (� cam- sioa� ?d 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR•co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 July 13, 2017 Tellier Properties, LLC Paul R. and Judith M. Tellier 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl. 16-51P,Tellier Subdivision, 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Boulevard Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tellier: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 11, 2017 to set the Engineering Subdivision bond at$23,200 for Appl. 16-51P, Tellier Subdivision. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars for this project. Copies of the Town of South Windsor Site/Subdivision Surety Policy and current W-9 form have been enclosed with this letter. Sincerely, Gary Bazzano, Chairman PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Enclosures GB/llz cc: Jeff Doolittle, Town Engineer Jeff Folger, Senior Environmental Planner BOND TRANSMITTAI DATE: August 16, 2017 APPLICANT NAME Paul Tellier ADDRESS 2063 John Fitch Boulevard South Windsor, CT 06074 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT 2045 and 2063 John Fitch Blvd SUBDIVISION S.T.A.R. Center Subdivision P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER 16-51P AMOUNT & TYPE OF BOND $ 23,3-&" Subdivision Bond CHECK NUMBER 564026 DEPARTMENT PLANNING SUBMITTED BY Lauren Zarambo 8/16/17 NAME DATE PROCESSED BY FINANCE EldRll7 NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 0 '7 -f 7 MUNIS APPLICATION 201601194 WAPlanning Admin\PZC\Bonds\2017 Bonds\l6-51P STAR Center Subdivision Bond.doc PAYMENT SUMMARY RECEIPT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 DATE: 08/16/17 CUSTOMER#: 000000000 TIME: 15:57 CLERK: laurenlz RECPT##: 20897985 PREV BAL: TP/YR: MS/2018 AMT PAID: 23200.00 BILL: ADJSTMNT: EFF DT: 08/16/17 BAL DUE: PERMITS/INSP PAYMENT -----------------TOTALS----------------- PRINCIPAL PAID: 23200.00 �\(� INTEREST PAID: .00 f3' ADJUSTMENTS. .00 Ua DISC TAKEN: .00 AMT TENDERED: 23200.00 AMT APPLIED: 23200.00 V CHANGE: .00 PAID BY: TELLIER PAUL R & JUD V� PAYMENT METH: CHECK ��� PAYMENT REF: 564026 i II PAYMENT SUMMARY RECEIPT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 DATE: 08/16/17 CUSTOMER#: 000594261 TIME: 11:26 TELLIER PAUL R & JUDITH CLERK: laurenlz RECPT#: 20897982 PREV BAL: TP/YR: MS/2018 AMT PAID: 50.00 BILL: ADJSTMNT: EFF DT: 08/15/17 BAL DUE: PERMITS/INSP PAYMENT -----------------TOTALS----------------- PRINCIPAL PAID: 50.00 INTEREST PAID: .00 ADJUSTMENTS: .00 DISC TAKEN: .00 AMT TENDERED: 50.00 AMT APPLIED: 50.00 CHANGE: .00 PAID BY: TELLIER PAUL R & JUD PAYMENT METH: CHECK PAYMENT REF: 1165 P.O.BOX 1167 21 JEFFREY DRIVE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 ftss�� FAX:8onalsi .8757 .corn www.design professionalsi nc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, * Rhode Island LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Michele Lipe Date: 8/14/2017 DPI Project No. 3300 Town of South Windsor Re: S.T.A.R. Center 2075 John Fitch Boulevard PZC Application Resubdivision/Site Plan/Special Exception WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ® Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 8/07/17 1 Site Plan/SE MYLAR:APP-2(Swap) These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ' ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections El Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Forbids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: RECENVED • AUG 14 2017 SOUTH WIND$M PLANNING DEPT. SIGNED: CC: Daniel4--Jameson, F1( .