Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
App 09-18P One Buckland Road
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION M�r.S O' zoo °°a96 APPLICATION FORM RECEIVED Application No: 0 4-/8 APR 2 7 2009 Official Receipt Date: 'o�?-Oq Receipt No: 2033y0 1 SOUTH MNOSOR PLANNING DEPi` APPLICANT: Scott Leonard PROJECT NAME: One Buckland Road ADDRESS: _ 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road, 395 Smith Street OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Scott Leonard ADDRESS: 110 Lavender Lane, Rocky 1111, CT 06067 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: West of Buckland Road,South of Smith Street;GIS#15300001,15300009,15300015,83700395 ASSESSOR'S MAP # 18 PARCEL# 8,9, 10, 11 ZONE RR NAME, ADDRESS, TEL 8s FAX #OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie Design Professionals Inc 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 (860) 291-8755-phone (860) 291-8757-fax Estimated presentation time: t/2 hour THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ® Zone Change to RC (Public Hearing required and Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Subdivision/Re subdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development - State Hearing per Section 14-55 for ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision - Attach proposed amendment(Public Hearing Required) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for(Public Hearing Required) ❑ In Law apartment/Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation for (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Other(explain in detail) ZAnApication Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for an applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Ckiganatureoof'Plroperty Si ature of Applicant Owner P.O. BOX 1167 SCANNED 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,Cr 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 8onalsi .8757 c.com www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island Marcia Banach,Planning Director April 29, 2009 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue : South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Leonard Zone Change Application • "One Buckland Road" South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj.No. 1831 Marcia: As requested this morning, enclosed herewith are eight copies of the zone change map for the above-referenced site,modified to depict commercial buildings within 500 feet of the zone change area, e.g., Plaza at Buckland Hills, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Lowe's, and LL Bean, and further modified to depict Manchester's commercial zones. As you can see,the property is surrounded on all sides by commercial zones, save for a portion of the westerly side,which is zoned RR. I have also enclosed Scott's authorization letter,the abutter letter, and the abutter listing. I understand your office will be notifying the Town of Manchester and the Capital Region Council of Governments, and that the hearing is tentatively scheduled for the evening of Tuesday June 9. All the best. • DESIG ROFESSIONALS,INC. By: Peter A. DeMallie • President Xc: Scott Leonard Peter Jay Alter, Esq. Matthew Galligan Jan Murtha • Craig Stevenson SUA' NNED Scott Leonard 1 10 Lavender Lane Rocky Hill,CT 06067 April 27, 2009 To Whom It May Concern: I,Scott Leonard;owner of 1, 9& 15 Buckland Road,and of 3 95 Smith Street, all in the Totivn of South Windsor,do hereby authorize Peter R.DeMallie,President of Design Professionals,Inc.to act as my agent and to execute and submit my application for a zone change of the subject premises. This authorization covers my interests as owner and applicant with respect to this Planning&Zoning Commission application.Thank you. Ve o S - 1 P.O. BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 SCANNED e PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 8onalsi .8757 c.com www.design professional si nc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS April 29, 2009 Property Owner : Address City, ST Zip VIA CERTIFIED MAIL • Re: Planning and Zoning Commission Application 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road, 395 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Property Owner: • In accordance with the Town of South Windsor Zoning Regulations, you are hereby notified that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours at 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith Street and is subject to a hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. All members of the public are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact the Planning Department, 644-2511, ext. 253. • If you have any questions about the details of the application,please feel free to call our office. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. Benjamin P. Wheeler, RLA Director of Operations Cc: Town of South Windsor Client P.O. BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE ■ SOUTH WINDSOR,CI'06074 �h PHONE: 860.291.8755 � Is FAX:860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Abutters Application of: One Buckland Road 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith Street • DPI Project No. 1831 April 27, 2009 Map Lot Property Owner Mailing Address Town State zip 18 6 Lowes Home Centers Attn: PO Box 1000 ML CD Tax Dept. 2ETA Mooresville NC 28115 27 15 Buckland Road Retail,LLC 6410 Popular Ave., • #850 Memphis TN 38119 18 12 *Richard&Irene Gancarz 383 Smith Street South Windsor CT 06074 • 18 16 *Downeast Associates LP PO Box 6120 • c/o RE Tax Dept. Indianapolis IN 46206 *-Direct Abutter SCANNED 0 �-.� 01P s-ate 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soR•co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 5195 April 30, 2009 Town Clerk Town of Manchester 41 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040 Re: Notice to Adjoining Municipalities Dear Madam/Sir: In accordance with Connecticut General Statutes concerning notification to municipalities regarding Planning&Zoning Commission applications that could affect the abutting town,we hereby notify you of the following application submitted by Scott Leonard: Appl 09-19P, Scott Leonard—Request for zone change to Restricted Commercial for 2.06+/- acres (4 properties) at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith St, RR zone This application is tentatively scheduled for public hearing on Tuesday, June, 9 2009 at the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Ave., South Windsor, CT 06074. If you have any question,please feel free to contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Very truly yours, Marcia A Banach,AICP Director of Planning MRL cc: Mark Pellegrini, Manchester Planning Department Encl. Zone Change Map May 04 09 10:09a p 1 P.O.BOX 1 167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE G'sign SOUT1i VANDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:660291.8755 ! ?! Sionals FAe 860.291.B757 lxafessianalsinccom VILRAFFIC ENGINEERS I PLANNERS/SURVEYORS (GIS ANALYSTS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serwng Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island FAX To: Marcia Banach From: Ben Wheeler Faic 644-7280 Pages: 2 Phone: . Date: 5/4/09 Re: One Buckland Road-Zone Change Application DPI Project: 1831 : ❑Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply • Comments: Please find attached the Certified Mail receipts of the abutter notifications for the above application postmarked 4- 29-09. Please call if you have any questions. May 04 09 10:09a P 2 Postal Postal CD i CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT U.S.• . f� ServiceTM r'- r MAIL. RECEIPT f�Ln CERTIFIED•. • .• Ln � �I A L US E -r' For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.cor%, �- , D ` � I A L,,--MASE Pcstaye $ ��SJ\ tr ti7 q ti , rrrl Carxed Fee Postage p oU rr Aatum Recalpt Fee ^ to ? I r Q Certttled Fee ` (Endor�mentAequlred) pc. G yS� f� 0 L/Ic� r, ! C3 Restdcted Dellvery Fee J''. : �� (Endorsement RM Flew puked► \ He r, r9 (Endorsement Required) r� 3 podDli ' R (Endorsement Total PostageA r . ,_,i m r3 r T° Total PAStage$Fm= r yt Buckland Road Retail, LLC o sen+rr° e pczwe or PoBxNo. .__. Lowes Home Centers 6410 Popular Ave.,#350 r Nor;A No; sr.re z►R+ Memphis, TN 38119 o.POt3oxMo. Attn:Tax Dept_ aty srare,'z�P;�o PO Box 1000 ML CD 2ETA Mooresville, NC 28115 .r U.S. Postal Service'r. m RECEIPT Postal » o •. Only, -n CERTIFIED NqAIL,,.,, RECEIPT u7 lti (Domestic Mail Only,No Insurance Coverage Provided) n Ln For delivery information visit our wwebsite at www.usps.camcf OFFICIAL Us". -41 OFFICIAL USE Postage $ 1 L/-)t- Ir oCertified Fee y1/f r,I Pastas O �Q y p Certified Fee p Retum flecelpt Fee Hera C3 r P (Endorsement Required) �, �p p Return Receipt fee i 3�^ (Endorsement Requred) _ M Restrlcied Delivery Fee Q G v ZC? ,_} ndorsemenlR tit t� Gp r.l. ... (E Rea red) D Restricted DelCry Fee m ^ (Endorsement Required) Total Postage&Fwac , (7l 3 l o 0 Ln Total Postage&Farms C 3 seta To Ln ter,Apt No" Richard &Irene Gancarz � sarx r° Downeast Associates, LP or PO Box No. 383 Smith Street r` SSeer~ApENo:,- c/o RE Tax Dept. "sraie:ziP�a South Windsor, CT 06074 or PO Box""'cny,sr PO Box 6120 aie,ziP+i Indianapolis, IN 46206 minrp :fir SUMMARY OF ZONING, SUBDIVISION AND POCD REFERRALS CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RECEIVED 4/10/2009 through 5/1/2009 241 Main St.Hartford CT 06106 DATE DUE SENT BY FOR CERTI- CRCOG DATE SENT CERTIFIED NEXT RPC PUBLIC HEARING FIED REF.# TOWN CERTIFIED MAILING ABUTTING TOWNS DESCRIPTION MEETING DATE MAIL? POCD-2009-1 Marlborough 4/9/2009-Date 4/9/2009 Glastonbury,Hebron,East Marlborough 2009 Plan of Conservation and 5/21/2009 TBD Received Hampton,Colchester,Midstate Development Update NA RPA Z-2009-27 Barkhamsted 4/21/2009 5/12/2009 Granby,Canton Proposed change to add new regulations to 5/21/2009 June 11,2009 include a Shared Driveway and Estate Yes Lots/Private Road. Z-2009-28 South Windsor .4/22/2009 4/26/3009 Hartford,Windsor,East Proposed amendments to Section 4.4.5.E to allow 5/21/2009 May 26,3009 Windsor,Ellington,Vernon, certain types of outdoor storage and activities by Manchester,East Hartford Special Exception approval and to Tables 6.5.8.A,6.5.9.A and 6.5.10.A to allow temporary Yes law and sandwich signs in Commercial& Industrial zones for a limited time Z-2009-29 Enfield 4/29/2009 Somers,Ellington,East Proposed addition of Section 3.30.08 on Height 5/21/2009 TBD Windsor,Suffield,Windsor Exceptions for spires,cupolas,towers,chimneys, Yes Locks flagpoles,penthouses,ventilators,tanks and similar features Z-2009-30 South Windsor 4/30/2009 5/10/2009 Hartford,Windsor,East Proposed Zone Map change from RR,Rural 5/21/2009 June 9,2009 Windsor,Ellington,Vernon, Residential to RC,Restricted Commercial on Manchester,East Hartford property at Buckland Road and Smith Street Yes where a portion of the property is within the town of Manchester in a General Business Zone If you would like copies of any referral(s),call Emily Moos at(860)522-2217,Ext.219. PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: April 29, 2009 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Steve Lavigueur, Chris Dougan, Bob DeVito John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan, Ron Asselin FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning &Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: App109-18P, Leonard Zone Change Location: 1, 9, 15 Buckland Rd & 395 Smith St ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres 2 Zone ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System Zone change request from Rural Residential to Restricted Commercial Project Description: for 2 acres on the corner of Smith St&Buckland, at the town line Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Tentatively scheduled for PZC hearing on June 9 Please comment by May 15, 2009 and return to the Planning Department. SCANNED PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: April 29, 2009 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick,Rich Bond, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Steve Lavigueur, Chris Dougan, Bob Devito John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan, Ron Asselin FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 09-18P, Leonard Zone Change Location: 1, 9, 15 Buckland Rd & 395 Smith St ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres 2 Zone ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System Zone change request from Rural Residential to Restricted Commercial Project Description: for 2 acres on the corner of Smith St&Buckland, at the town line Future Town-owned property involved? ❑Yes ®No ❑new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Tentatively scheduled for PZC hearing on June 9 Please comment by May 15, 2009 and return to the Planning Department. Health Department does not have concerns with the zone change but does have concerns with Site development and the impact it will have on neighboring properties, Specific concerns are With neighboring septic systems. PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: April 29, 2009 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Steve Lavigueur, Chris Dougan, Bob DeVito John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan, Ron Asselin FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 09-18P, Leonard Zone Change Location: 1, 9, 15 Buckland Rd & 395 Smith St ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres 2 Zone ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System Zone change request from Rural Residential to Restricted Commercial Project Description: for 2 acres on the corner of Smith St&Buckland, at the town line Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑ new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Tentatively scheduled for PZC hearing on June 9 Please comment by May 15, 2009 and return to the Planning Department. Health Department does not have concerns with the zone change but does have concerns with Site development and the impact it will have on neighboring properties, Specific concerns are With neighboring septic systems. Fire {�-��641mk � ho COtMm�rl 1 ,p`NN SfT-0� Ole 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR-CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 5195 April 30, 2009 Town Clerk Town of Manchester 41 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040 Re: Notice to Adjoining Municipalities Dear Madam/Sir: In accordance with Connecticut General Statutes concerning notification to municipalities regarding Planning&Zoning Commission applications that could affect the abutting town, we hereby notify you of the following application submitted by Scott Leonard: App109-19P, Scott Leonard—Request for zone change to Restricted Commercial for 2.06+/- acres (4 properties) at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith St, RR zone This application is tentatively scheduled for public hearing on Tuesday, June, 9 2009 at the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Ave., South Windsor, CT 06074. If you have any question,please feel free to contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Very truly yours, Marcia A Banach,AICP Director of Planning MRL cc: Mark Pellegrini, Manchester Planning Department Encl. Zone Change Map UPpEGlpry. Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Ma' Street • Hartford • Connecticut • 06106 Z p O� Tel eye 8 ° -2217 e Fax(860) 724-1274 f www.ercog.org MAY �+'0d� A � t O3 SORPU�yG�. Melody A. Currey,, Chairman M �NNED Lyle D. lCray,Executive Director May 26,2009 MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ON Zoning Andover REFERRAL Avon Town of South Windsor Z-2009-30 Bloomfield COMMISSIONERS: Bolton Canton Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mentioned referral. Notice of this proposal was East Granby transmitted to the Planning Division of the Capitol Region Council of Governments under the East Hanford provisions of Section 8-3b of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended. East Windsor Proposed Zone Map change from RR,Rural Residential to RC,Restricted Commercial Ellington on property at Buckland Road and Smith Street where a portion of the property is within Enfield the town of Manchester in a General Business Zone Farmington Comment: The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region Glastonbury Council of Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with Granby regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. Hartford Questions concerning this referral should be directed to Emily Moos. Hebron Manchester In accordance with our procedures this letter will constitute final CRCOG action on this Marlboroughreferral. The public hearing date has been scheduled for 6/9/2009. Newington DISTRIBUTION: Rocky Hill Plainer: Hartford,Windsor,East Windsor, Ellington,Vernon,Manchester,East Hartford Simsbury Somers South Windsor Respectfully submitted, John Larensen, Chairman Suffield Regional Planning Commission Tolland Elaine Carey,Vice Chairman Vernon Regional Planning Commission West Hartford C�/ Wethersfield Emily Moo Windsor Senior Community Development Planner Windsor Locks A voluntat),Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region J t/ T S Y;-J 3 _:—5-1 1 D SUFFIELD 700 North St. (Rt CITY RECYCLING-Will buy RED SOX vs Yanks 6/10, RF K 75). 6/6, Sam 3pm. Toys, your scrap steel, copper, alu- Bud deck, (2)$601each. Call sports/poldical,Qots of Reagan) minum,cars&trucks:20 Fish- 989-2357 other collect1Wes. Children's 'fry St, Htfd. 860-522-9273 PUBLIC NO� items, pet supplies, furniture, WNDSORPLANNNG&ZONNGCDNMISSION ;3 books decorative items,HUGE WANTED:Gold&S!Ner,Palnt TAG SALE! i s Oriental R Anti ues& B A N A ng ' ' q Noti is ereb Ivan th _.. h at there well be a Public Hearn on TOLLAND 108 Williams Way, Collectibles. Immediate Pay Y 9 9 f A M E R 6/6,8-2.Freezer Disney videos ment.Scott(860)233-5500 Ju 9,2009,at 7:30 p.m,in the Council Chambers of the. L I A S ktds stuff hh&much more! h Windsor Town Hall to consider the following: Tolland-208 Rhodes Rd 6/6 8- I E S T O Recreation 4Pm AC unit,Elec plane,yam, 1. Appl. 09-18P, Scott Leonard, One Buckland Rd—re- S O N bikes roller blades,Must See! quest for zone change to Restricted Commercial for V N S L1V r. 2.06+/-acres(4 properties)at 1,9,15 Buckland Road I O N S and 395 Smith St,RR zone 4 D O W N VERNON 149 Vernon Ave.Sat- € W E E urda 6/6-7am-3pm Misc. BAYUNER `2003 - 175 bow Copies of the applications are on file in the office of I. C H E W naer,�d:ANT14uES. rider.135 HP&trailer.Stereo, HARLAN Town Clerk and/or the Planning Department.At this heart , VERNON- 20 Olson Dr., Sat, fishfinder. 15 original hours.. interested persons may appear and be heard,and w' en. R E T E $9500.Call649-8757 LEVY 6/6, 8-2 Multi-fam. kids, hh, comments by the public will be received. O R E S couch,lots more! CONSUMER > C E N T Vernon 234-South St June 5th& DIARY Patrick Kennedy,C an 6th. 9-2pm. Huge Tag Safe! answer Collet,House ware&Fumlture Journal Inquirer Go Cart-Off Road,5 hp,Briggs May 28,2009 VERNON 59 Winding-Trl Rd. , &Stratton Engine hardly used, 7 ,offt=e- 616&617,8a-3p.Toys,prof hair like new,asking$600 420-1425 �1 ��c,N�� June 4,2009 )ar dryer.Something for everyone. Wednesday offering VERNON,97 Campbell qz-, k Scheme 6/6-6/7, 9-3pm. Giant !'ueucNoncE fordable Plant salell$1 r l : "'` ��S111d1�� _asy 2 person Kiak Great Cond,w/ INVITATION TO BID FOR "un WINDSOR 223 West St,6/6- 1 2�ple$7�5bo558-9654 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ON 617, 9-3. Many Household 1• SLATER STREErAT BEST BUY AND CIRCIdT CITY DRIVEWAYS DWnS items and much more! S�Cti®� WEIDER HOME GYM-Best Of- �. ee STATE PROJECT 7Cr210 'haraoh s WINDSOR LOCKS 22 Pearl fer.Please Call860-&%-6988 BID NO.08/09-126 ` Symbol St. Saturday June 6th. 9-2. a A This work includes the installation of a new traffic signal Furniture, Electronics, vid- Fel l eos and much more!No early at the intersection of Slater Street and commercial drive- .-ales birds. r ; ways at 120 Slater Street and 165 Slater Street in Man- Windsor Locks 45 West St chester,CT.It also includes other appurtenant work such as Tavern Fri/Sat 8-2pm. Golf Balls, $1- PUBLIC NOTICE sidewalk construction,pavement marking and sign installa- Wdzn,electrolux vacuum,delta -inks home craft saw,&etc tion;and maintenance and protection of traffic. The Ellington Zoning Board of Appeals,at their meeting on Sealed Bids will be received at the office of the Director area WINDSOR LACKS 65 SW Ave., Monday,June 1,2009,took the following actions: ieck/m.o.)to Sat 616, earn-4pm. Must of General Services,Lincoln Center,494 Main Street,Man- FL 32853-6475 sours see! chester,Connecticut 06040 for the project"TRAFFIC SIG- 1. Approved-#V200908-Linda Gay owner/applicant for NAL INSTALLATION ON SLATER STREET AT BEST 9 tp WINDSOR LOCKS-Multi faro 10, variance of Ellington Zoning Regulation Section 3.21- - Suffield St,Fri/Sat June5&6.9- BUY AND CIRCUIT CITY DRIVEWAYS"until 2.00 p.m.on } 5 Clothes,fum,baby items,etc Lot Area,Width&Yard Requirements:to reduce the THURSDAY,JUNE 25,2009 at which time and place said side yard setback from 10'to 4'and the rear yard set- bids will be opened publicly and read aloud.Bids may be back from 10'to 3'6"for the replacement of a de- hand delivered to the above address or directed by U.S. " tached garage on property located at 29 Chestnut St., Mail said office at Town of Manchester,Lincoln Center, used furniture. ANTIQUES jewelry,Top prices toys,lamps APN 020 135-0000 in a`Res!dential(A)Zone. 494 Main Street, P.O. !Sox 191, Manchester,CT 06045- . paid.Call 860-871-2.181, 0191. r zi zz 2. Approved - #V200910 Ellington Motors, Inc., The Contract Drawings and Specifications (i.e., docu- Effiffim owner/applicant for variance of .Ellington Zoning ments)may be examined at theoffice of the Director of ; Regulations Section 4.2.1-Lot Area, Width & Yard General Services,Lincoln Center,494 Main Street,P.O.Box NOIICETO CREDITORS Requirements:to reduce the front yard setback from 191 Manchester, Connecticut 06045 0191. Sets of the ESTATEOF . 100'to 26'for pitched roof on existing building at 293 documents can be obtained upon payment of a non- David A LEMot(0901831 Somers Rd.,APN 083-0012-0000 in a Commercial(C) refundable fee of$10.00/set in cash or check,made pay- The Hon. O.James Purnell, Zone. able to the Town of Manchester.Sets of the documents will t III,Judge of the Court of Pro- be mailed to prospective bidders upon request and receipt bate,District of Ellington,b 3. Approved-#V200911- 9t Y of a separate check for$10.00 made payable to the Town of . decree dated June 2, 2009, Rick Dondero, owner/applicant, Little House in the Manchester,which will not be refunded. ordered that all claims must Country for variance of Ellington Zoning Regulations Bid security in the form of a bid bond,payable to the-3 as ao be presented to the fiduciary. Section 4,1-Permitted Uses and Uses Requiring Spe- Town of Manchester, is required in the sum of 5 percent -at the address below.Failure clal Permit:to permit the use of a day care at 2 Nut- (5°/u) of the total bid. Bid security shall be subject to the to promptly present any such meg Dr.,APN 017-022-OD02 in an Industrial(Q Zone. ;ditions set forth in the Standard Instructions to Bidders. claim may result in the loss of No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of sixty(60) rights to recover on such 4. Approved - #V200912 - Brian & Kristen Deptula days after the date of bid opening. owner/ licant for variance of Ellington Zoning g 6-4 claim. owner/applicant � g The minimum rates to be paid labor of the various classi- Thomas H.Smith, Regulations Sections 3.2.1-Lot Area, Width&Yard fications shall be in accordance with current schedule of Ork it: Assistant Clerk Requirements&2.1.10-Highway Clearance Setback: wages established by the State Labor Commissioner as The fiduciary is: to reduce the front yard setback from 55'to 47'for an provided in the General Statutes of Connecticut,as revised. Dorothy LaMot,cto addition at 55 Ellington Ave.,APN 020-098-0006 fn a The bidder agrees that 10% of the awarded contract Residential Zone: Martin B.Burke,Esq. ( value shall be performed by disadvantaged business enter- A is Used 130 Union Street prises(DBE)as approved subcontractor or owner-operator a P.O.Box 388 5. Approved-#V200913-Joan Arena owner/applicant ,le letters, of construction equipment. The successful bidder must in- )rds are all Rockville,CT 06066 for variance of Slington Zoning Regulations Sections dicate the disadvantaged business enterprise(s)it intends to,,� Journal Inquirer 3.2.1-Lot Area,Width&Yard Requirements&2.1.10- utilize to achieve the above stated percentage prior to the June 4,2009 Highway Clearance Setback:to reduce the front yard award of contract. NOTICE TO CREDITORS setback from 55'to 20'for a roof extension and from All bidders are required to inform themselves fully of the ESTATE OF 55'to 41'for a deck at 84 Ellington Ave.,APN 029- _conditions relating to the construction and labor under ._ Carol Ann McGovem(03-0182) 052-0000 in a Residential(A)Zone. which the work will be or is now being performed and the TT T7 7 77 Thu: Hon. 0. .1amac Plsmall enntmrtnr shall-amnlnv ac far as nnccihlt% snrh mPthnds WMPeter Jay Alter, LLC ATTORNEY AT LAW RFrFIVED Peter Jay Alter �U U is 700 poi Hebron Avenue palter@pjallc.com l P.O.Box 1530 Glastonbury,CT Gail S.Shaulys SCANNE SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. o6033 OF COUNSEL gshaulys@pjallc.com 86o.652.4020 telephone 86o.652.4022 facsimile June 5,2009 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Marcia Banach, Director of Planning South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Reference: Zone Change Application Scott Leonard, Buckland Road Ladies/Gentlemen: Please be advised that I represent Scott Leonard, the applicant for a zone change of his property on Buckland Road that is currently scheduled for public hearing on June 9, 2009. On behalf of Mr. Leonard, and with his authority, I hereby request that the commencement of the public hearing be postponed to the Commission's July meeting. In addition, as required by Connecticut General Statutes, the applicant hereby consents to an extension of time in which to commence the Public Hearing with respect to the pending application. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Yours truly, Peter Jay ter, Attorney for Scott Leonard Duly Authorized Cc: Scott Leonard Design Professionals \v( oW N SFqN N ED �� uu o x r own O-P Souu c � w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 Sox-c° TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 5300 June 9, 2009 Design Professionals Peter DeMallie 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Appl. # 09-18P, Leonard Zone Change Please be advised that the Public Hearing of the Planning Sv Zoning Commission in the above referenced matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, July, 14 2009, at 7:30 in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Someone must be present at the hearing to represent the application. One sign advertising the hearing must be posted on the property for ten (10) consecutive days prior to the hearing and must be clearly visible from a town street. Please have one sign posted on Buckland by July 3, 2009. Signs can be obtained in the Planning Department. Sincerely, Maria Acevedo Administrative Secretary ma Peter Jay Alter, LLC WH ATTORNEI' AT LAW t. --SCAI 1 Peter Jay Alter poi Hebron Avenue palierC%pjallc.com P.O.Boa 1S30 Glastonbury,CT Gail S.Shaulys o6033 or COUNSEL gshaulys@pjallc.coin 86o.6S2.40z0 telephone 86o.652.4022 facsimile June 30, 2009 Mr. Kevin Sims Simon Group 115 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Via E-Mail Only: ksims(iOimon.com Reference: Scott Leonard Property, Buckland Road, Manchester-South Windsor, CT Dear Kevin: Thank you for taking the time to discuss the above-referenced property with me during our telephone conference last week. As I indicated, my client, Scott Leonard, owns approximately 2.0 Acres, more or less, on the westerly side of Buckland Road, immediately northerly of your company's center in Manchester. We have been urged by the Town Planner in South Windsor, Ms. Marcia Banach, to seek your company's approval to connect an access drive into your shopping center in Manchester rather than seek approval for a separate commercial driveway access from Buckland Road. I requested that you consider granting such rights to Mr. Leonard. In addition, I am seeking permission to tie into the sanitary sewer located within forty feet (40') of the common property line between your center and Mr. Leonard's property. Other sewer connections are available but at substantially greater cost and inconvenience to my client. You indicated in our telephone conference that your company has a very firm policy in dealing with such requests in that such requests are uniformly rejected, or, if ever considered, are tied to extremely protective restrictive covenants and monetary consideration. I am asking that you respond in writing to my request. My intention is to present your response to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission to indicate that we made the effort requested by Ms. Banach and that your company indicated its intention to adhere to its long- standing policy. We are currently scheduled to appear before the Commission on July 14, 2009. It would be helpful if you could respond prior to that date. Peter Jay Mter, LLC ® ATTORNEY AT LAW Mr. Kevin Sims Simon Group June 30, 2009 Page 2. Your willingness to discuss the entire process with me and your thorough explanation behind your company's policies were much appreciated. I have made Mr. Leonard aware of the courtesy and consideration that you gave to this matter. Thank you. Yours truly, eter Ja ter, Attorney for Scott Leonard Cc: Scott Leonard Peter DeMallie P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE ■ SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 @SIg11 PHONE:860.291.8755 r01�eSS10 FA 8 .8757 IS www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode/stand • RECEIVE DLETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Marcia Banal' JU� Date: 7/10/2009 DPI Project No. 1831 (', 2009 Re: Zone Change Scott Leonard : • SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications : ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • • • • COPIES DATE„ • . DESCRIPTION 1 July 2009 Traffic Report These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ ForApproval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ® For your use ❑ Make corrections ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit • ❑ Return corrected prints • ❑ For review and comment ❑ For bids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us • REMARKS: CC: Engineering Department with 1 copy : • SIGNED: CC: Galen Semprebon,P.E.,LEED AP SCANNED Traffic Impact Analysis Scott Leonard 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road South Windsor & Manchester, Connecticut RECEIVED ►JUL (f 9 2009 =[1MISOR PLANNING DEPT, •yip:{paWa ,r,�,ira:pru191 R Prepared by Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 DPI Project No. 05-1831.2 July 2009 SCANNED Table of Contents: Page# Introduction Study Area 1 Existing Roadway Network 1 Proposed Site Drive 1 Background Traffic Volumes 2 Site-Generated Traffic 4 Traffic Distribution 5 Combined Traffic Volumes 5 Traffic Operations Analysis 6 Sight Line Analysis 6 Conclusions 7 7 Appendices Site Location Map Background Traffic Volumes A Site Generation Calculations B Combined Traffic Volumes C Traffic Operations Analysis (Background-Weekday P.M.) D Traffic Operations Analysis (Background-Saturday) F Traffic Operations Analysis (Combined-Weekday P.M.) G Traffic Operations Analysis (Combined-Saturday) g Introduction: SCANNED The following traffic study has been prepared as part of a Planning and Zoning Commission application for a zone change from Residential to Restricted Commercial (RC)zone for land owned by Scott Leonard at 1, 9, & 15 Buckland Road in South Windsor, Connecticut. The site is located on the west side of Buckland Road and straddles the South Windsor/Manchester Town line. The site consists of 4 parcels of land containing approximately 2.1 ac. The report has also been prepared to address an issue that has been raised as to whether the site should have a separate curb cut on Buckland Road, or be restricted to access through the adjacent plaza to the south of the site. Appendix A contains a site location map for the study site. Study Area: The site is located within a heavy retail corridor, and the size of the site is very small when compared to the surrounding retail developments. The site is located in a very interesting area. Due to the center median within Buckland Road, traffic entering and exiting the site will be restricted to right turns only. The question raised is what will be the impact of adding a driveway in the corridor on the existing traffic patterns. As such the study area has been taken as the section of Buckland Road extending from Tamarack Avenue to Pleasant Valley Road. Buckland Road becomes Buckland Street within the town of Manchester. Existing Roadway Network: Buckland Road at Tamarack Avenue: This intersection is a 4-way signalized intersection. Buckland Road runs in the north/south direction through this intersection. Tamarack Avenue(Evergreen Walk's southern drive)runs from Buckland Road to the west. The Northern Hills Drive(Access drive to Lowes and Target)runs from Buckland Road to the east. The Buckland Road northbound approach is four lanes wide, with one left turn lane, two through lanes, and a dedicated right turn lane. The Buckland Road southbound approach is three lanes wide with a dedicated left turn lane, one through lane and one through/right turn lane. Tamarack Avenue eastbound approach has a through/left turn lane, a dedicated through lane, and a dedicated right turn lane. The Northern Hills Drive westbound approach has a dedicated left turn lane, a combination left turn/through lane, and a dedicated right turn lane. The traffic signal consists of six phases. The first phase is a southbound advance which provides an opportunity for southbound traffic on Buckland Road to turn left into the Northern Hills Driv. Also permitted during this phase are west bound right turns fr und om Northern Hills Drive onto Buckland Road. The second phase allows the northbo through and right turn movements to occur on Buckland Road. The third phase allows SCANNED the Tamarack Avenue traffic to exit onto Buckland Road in both directions and the through movement to Northern Hills Drive. The fourth phase allows for all westbound movements from Northern Hills Drive. The fifth phase allows for the northbound left turn movement from Buckland Road into Tamarack Avenue, and also allows for a right turn movement from Tamarack avenue to southbound on Buckland Road. The sixth phase allows for the southbound through movement on Buckland Road. All approaches are vehicular actuated and part of a closed-loop interconnected traffic signal system along Buckland Road. Buckland Street at Plaza at Buckland Hills Driveway: The Buckland Street/Plaza at Buckland Hills Driveway is a tee intersection where Buckland Street runs north south forming two legs, and The Plaza at Buckland Hills Driveway forms the third leg running west off of Buckland Street. The intersection is un-signalized. Buckland Street in the southbound direction through this intersection contains two through lanes,two left turn lanes, and a right turn lane(extending from the Pleasant Valley Road intersection to the north). The Town Center Plaza,driveway has a single exiting lane. Buckland Street at Pleasant Valley Road: This intersection is a 4-way signalized intersection. Buckland Street runs in the north/south direction through this intersection. Pleasant Valley Road runs from Buckland Street to the west. Buckland Hills Drive runs from Buckland Street to the east. The Buckland Street northbound approach is five lanes wide,with two dedicated left turn lanes,two through lanes, and a dedicated right turn lane. The Buckland Street southbound approach is five lanes wide with a two dedicated left turn lanes, two through lanes and a dedicated right turn lane. Pleasant Valley Road eastbound approach has five lanes with two dedicated left turn lanes, two through lanes and a dedicated right turn lane. The Buckland Hills Drive westbound approach has 5 lanes with two dedicated left turn lanes,two through lanes and a dedicated right turn lane. The traffic signal consists of eight phases. The first phase is a northbound advance which provides an opportunity for northbound traffic on Buckland Street to turn left onto Pleasant Valley Road. The second phase allows the southbound through movements to occur on Buckland Street. The third phase allows the westbound left turn movements to occur. The fourth phase allows for the eastbound through movements to occur. The fifth phase allows for the northbound through movements on Buckland Street. The sixth phase allows for the southbound left turn movement from Buckland Street onto Buckland Hills Drive. The seventh phase allows for eastbound left turns from Pleasant Valley Road to northbound on Buckland Street. The eighth phase allows for westbound through movement to occur. All approaches are vehicular actuated. Proposed Site Driveway: The issue has been raised as to whether the site should have a separate curb cut on Buckland Road, or be restricted to access through the adjacent Plaza at Buckland Hills immediately to the south of the site. SCANNCU There appears to be a number of issues with utilizing the Plaza at Buckland Hills driveway as a primary access to the subject site. Traffic counts were conducted during the Weekday P.M.peak hours and also during the Saturday peak hours at the intersection of Buckland Street and the Plaza at Buckland Hills. Completing the traffic counts afforded ample opportunity to observe this intersection in actual operation. We observed that approximately two times as many cars exited from the Plaza at Buckland Hills onto Buckland Street from the driveway as entered the driveway from Buckland Street. This was true for both the weekday P.M.peak hours and the Saturday peak hours. Of the cars that exited from the Plaza at Buckland Street, approximately 1/2 were noted to be crossing the right turn and two through lanes to take a left at the Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection. Many of the vehicles would cross into the left most left turn lane in order to make a U-turn at this intersection. In order to be able to make this maneuver, the automobiles would need to wait until there was a break in the traffic sufficient to make this maneuver. The Buckland Road/Tamarack traffic light to the north systematically provided a platoon affect that generally afforded at least one or two vehicles to make this maneuver every cycle. During the majority of the cycle, vehicles would often be backed up within the Plaza at Buckland Hills drive waiting for a clear avenue for the first car in line to make the crossing maneuver to the left turn lanes at the Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection. Often 5+vehicles were in the queue at this driveway waiting. During this period, vehicles were continuing to enter the driveway often at a reasonable higher rate of speed then would typically be experienced at driveways. The dedicated right turn lane for the southbound Buckland Street at Pleasant Valley Road extends beyond the Plaza at Buckland Hills driveway. As such vehicles turning right both into the Plaza at Buckland Hills and vehicles turning right at Pleasant Valley Road both use the same lane. This appears to create some confusion whereby vehicles proceeding to Pleasant Valley Road to take the right turn are traveling at a higher rate of speed and having to react suddenly to vehicles taking a right into the Plaza at Buckland Hills. Providing a primary site access through the Plaza at Buckland Hills would be difficult due to the constraints imposed by the present operations. Due to the existing queues of vehicles waiting to exit the Plaza at Buckland Hills onto Buckland Street, any traffic from the subject site that's exiting onto Buckland Street at this location could potentially obstruct the traffic entering the plaza from Buckland Street. Due to the higher speeds of some vehicles entering the plaza,this could be a very serious condition. The alternative of providing a primary site access directly onto Buckland Road from the site appears to be a better alternative. There is ample sight distance to safely locate a curb cut on Buckland Road along the frontage of the subject site. The driveway location at a greater distance from the intersection of Buckland Street and Pleasant Valley Road allows a greater distance for vehicles to change lanes. The location of the site drive to the north of the beginning of the left turn lanes and right turn lane allow vehicles to enter the SCANNED roadway without interfering with the weaving maneuvers occurring with the additional turn lanes. The proposed site drive is designed to intersect Buckland Road to form a tee intersection. The site drive will be controlled by a stop sign, allowing for free now of traffic on Buckland Road. There will be a single lane approach on the site driveway. Background Traffic Volumes: The site is located in a very dynamic retail area, with a high level of development occurring. Due to the retail nature of the area,the typical retail peak periods (weekday between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M., and Saturday between 11:00 A.M. and 1:00 P.M.) were used for analysis. The analysis assumes that the site will be permitted during the winter of 2009/2010, and construction is to be complete by the fall of 2010. As part of the proposed Evergreen Walk expansion,recent counts were completed by F. A. Hesketh&Associates, Inc. (FAH). FAH then compiled complete background traffic rates for a 2010 build year which included all of the Evergreen Walk expansion and also included the previously permitted Deming Plaza development. Subsequent to this analysis, the site for the proposed Deming Plaza development was re- permitted as a Senior Living facility with a substantially lower traffic associated with the development. In addition, one part of the Tuscan Hills development has been constructed and is now open for business. Traffic counts were conducted during the P.M.peak hours and the Saturday Peak hours at the intersection of Buckland Street and the Plaza at Buckland Hills driveway. The traffic counts conducted by Design Professionals indicated a higher level of traffic under 2009 existing conditions than contained in the FAH report for the 2010 background condition. The existing 2009 traffic counts were used for the analysis. These counts were distributed through the Buckland Road/Tamarack Ave. and Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection in the same proportion as contained in the FAH report. In order to develop background traffic volumes,the 2009 counts were increased by 1%to account for background traffic growth between 2009 and 2010. In addition,projected traffic volumes from a number of previously approved developments that have not been constructed were added to develop the 2010 background volumes. The Deming Plaza development was added. Even though the site was re-permitted for a senior living facility,the original Deming Plaza approval is still valid, and would be the higher of the two for traffic generation. The undeveloped portion of the Tuscan Hills development was added as was the additional traffic from the Evergreen walk residential and retail development as outlined in the FAH 2O07 reports. Appendix B contains the background traffic volumes for the weekday P.M. and Saturday peak hours. SCANNED Site-Generated Traffic: The site was reviewed for a number of traffic uses as allowed in the RC zone. Our understanding is that at the present time, fast food restaurants with a drive-thru are not permitted uses. The two uses with the potentially highest generation rates reviewed are a stand alone restaurant and retail. Based on conceptual site plans reviewed, the site can accommodate up to 14,700 S.F. of retail or up to 5,400 S.F. of restaurant. In reviewing the trip generation rates for a Quality Restaurant(Land use code 931)in the ITE manual, it was found that for the P.M. Peak hour and Saturday Peak hour,the trip generation would be less than for the 14,700 S.F. of retail. As such, the retail use was used for the trip generation analysis. In determining the projected site generated traffic volumes,the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report was utilized. The proposed site development is to consist of approximately 14,700 S.F. of retail stores. Land use code 814 within the ITE manual for"Specialty Retail Center"was used to calculate the projected trip generation rates for the facility. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicular movement. A vehicle that travels to the site is considered as one vehicle trip. When that vehicle leaves the site, it is considered as a separate vehicle trip. The land use code 814 for Specialty Retail Center was used. The land use code 820 Shopping Center could be used, but for small developments,the results are severely skewed. For instance, under land use code 820, a 14,700 S.F. retail center standing alone would generate 177 vehicle trips during the P.M.peak hour. Adding 14,700 S.F. of retail to a 100,000 S.F. retail center would only add 59 vehicle trips. For small retail centers, the results of using land use code 820 are severely skewed. The calculations using land use code 814 are contained in appendix C, and summarized below: Friday P.M. : 57 trips total (56%entering, 44%exiting) Saturday Peak Hour: No information given. The generation rates for the weekday P.M. peak hour were increased by a factor of 1.4 for use. Distribution was taken at 50% entering and 50% exiting. No reduction has been taken for either the weekday or Saturday peak hour due to pass-by trips. Typically it would be expected that a percentage of the vehicle trips would already be on the roadway network and would not be new generated trips. Different studies have shown from 25%to over 50%of vehicle trips may be pass-by trips depending upon the specific use(s). For purposes of analysis,no reduction has been taken for pass-by trips. Traffic Distribution: All traffic entering the site and exiting the site are right turns due to the existing roadway median. The distribution of traffic at the Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road SCANNED intersection was assumed to follow existing distribution patterns. All traffic at the Tamarack Drive/Buckland Road intersection was assumed to be coming from the north direction only. Combined Traffic Volumes: The combined traffic volumes consist of the addition of the background traffic volumes and the site generated traffic volumes. Included in appendix D are the combined traffic volumes for Weekday P.M. and Saturday peak hours. Traffic Operations Analysis: The analysis of the traffic operations of the study intersections was completed using the Synchro traffic software. The study intersections were analyzed under background and developed conditions. The background analyses for the study intersections are included in appendix E(Weekday P.M.) and appendix F(Saturday Peak Hour). The analysis under developed conditions for the study intersections and the site drive are included in appendix G(Weekday P.M.) and appendix H(Saturday Peak Hour). . The results are summarized in the following table. Table 1. Summary of Intersection Analysis Buckland Road at Tamarack Drive(2010 Design Year) Weekday P.M. Weekday P.M. Saturday Saturday Background Full Build Background Full Build Eastbound F F E Westbound E D E E E Northbound C C C Southbound E E C Overall D D F F F F Buckland Road at Site Drive(2010 Design Year) Weekday P.M. Weekday P.M. Saturday Saturday Background Full Build Background Full Build ICU LOS _ B C Buckland Street at Plaza at Buckland Hills Drive (2010 Design Year) Weekday P.M. Weekday P.M. Saturday Saturday Background Full Build Background Full Build ICU LOS C C D D Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road(2010 Design Year) Weekday P.M. Weekday P.M. Saturday Saturday Background Full Build Background Full Build Eastbound D D E Westbound E D D E E Northbound F F E Southbound D E Overall E D F F E E The proposed development will generate a very low level of traffic compared with the retail developments in the area, and is of such a modest size as to have a negligible impact on any of the study intersections. The traffic analysis of the intersection of Buckland Street at the Plaza at Buckland Hills Drive is miss-leading in its rating of the intersection. Due to the propensity for vehicles to cross all lanes of traffic to take a left at the Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection,the actual wait times for vehicles exiting the Plaza at Buckland Hills Driveway onto Buckland Street and the corresponding queue lengths are substantially greater than noted. During the Saturday count, there were always vehicles queued up waiting during the peak hour to exit this intersection. The driveway was operating at maximum capacity and vehicles waited through multiple cycles to exit this driveway. Sight Line Analysis: The sight lines for the proposed site driveway were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the proposed site drive. The sight line from the site drive extends to the north for approximately 700'. This would be adequate for a 65 mph design speed, and is more then adequate for the 40 mph posted speed. Conclusions: The change of zone for the site to RC and development of the site would have a negligible impact on the surrounding roadway network. Due to the limitations and issues with the existing Plaza at Buckland Hills Driveway on Buckland Street and its Proximity to the Buckland Street/Pleasant Valley Road intersection, we would not recommend accessing the site through this driveway as its primary access. We would recommend placement of the driveway on the subject site as far to the north as reasonable in order to maximize the separating distance from the proposed drive to the above noted intersection. APPENDIX A -----------.._,I _� � ZONE GD / ----- I 1� � I ____ o ti I ----s-- 27-15 oo. 6.65f cc. T� J i I A x +m i ZONE GD , SMITH STREET - — 18-6 ZONE RR I I i 5.09t cc. I IU J L 18-17 u') a .03f ac. -H M c `� 00 U) -*H j I O) rn ao�p °�Co 41 SITE ' 2.06t cc., ZONE DC I I i :: .... ..... L------------- 1 18-16 ..::. .42 :3 2.24f cc. ZONE CUD _/ 142-31 4.09t cc. ZONE GB / 142-1524 i 142-350 N /� ,' �` 5.53t cc. ; .74f cc. o / APPENDIX B TN. 860.291.8755 lilt 86o•291.6757 1I civil ra traffic•anginoara.planners aurvoyora landacap* architacta• gig 425 SullAwn Annuli PO Box 1167,South Wlnda+r,Connecticut 06074 PREPARED FM Scott Leonard 1-15 Suckland Road South Windsor & Manchester, CT 2010 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC WEEKDAY P.M PEAK N.T.S Z LLI X N J 0 J Z= J m= 160 10065 53 1284 1733 1733 171 458 197 246 396 j j L 664' 1214 BUCKLAND L F- 1800 ROAD ---� — 0 BUCKLAND 1714 166 1233F 86F 359 4 846 --�5 —�' 0 } 78 176 221 I —� 504 731 c) —� 0348 251 238 <Q z� a a wW Nm U> tl> m 0 H V) Q J _J N= Q J 11 z Tsl. 860.291 8755 �,�� Fax 880.291 8757 �e n omit it civil a traiflc•englnoers.planners surveyors -landscape architects•Ste 425 Sullivan Menus,PO Box 1167.South W1ndmor,Conneotfout OW74 PREPARED FW. Scott Leonard 1-15 Suckland Road South Windsor & Manchester, CT 2010 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC SATURDAY PEAK N.T.S Z ClQf LLJ Q �V) J� O J U(n Z= m J 2 195 158 125 97 1039 1838 1838 330822 273 605 � �. 702 1042 847 BUCKLAND 2015 BUCKLAND 1863 J � L ROAD 268 —i 1346— 0 152 556 77 —� 848 —► —� 72 141 542 0 251 710 v —� 0466 445 355 <a aCE o N J Q Y a Q D X m 0 Q J J_ N= a J CL APPENDIX C Appendix C In determining the projected site generated traffic volumes,the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Trip Generation Report was utilized. The Trip Generation data available for"Specialty retail Center" (ITE land use code 814) is based on a multitude of studies throughout the United States. Application of the data needs to take into account the size and number of studies and the average size of the study group. The proposed development is to consist of 14,700 S.F. or retail development. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicular movement. A vehicle that travels to the site is considered as one vehicle trip. When that vehicle leaves the site, it is considered as a separate vehicle trip. The ITE trip generation manual provides generation rates based on the gross square footage of the site development. Generation rates based on an average rate, ranges of rates, and a fitted curve are provided. The fitted curve for the generation rates fell within the range of rates, and was used for the weekday P.M. peak hour generation rates. The Saturday generation is discussed in the report. The calculations are as follows: Weekday P.M. Average=2.71 trips per 1,000 S.F. For 14,700 S.F. =40 trips Range of rates=2.03-5.16. For 14,700 S.F. =30-76 trips Fitted curve: Tt=2.40(X)+21.48. For 14,700 S.F. =57 trips The ITE data sheets are included herein for reference. Specialty Retail Center (814) _ Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs; 1000 Sq..,Feet Gross_Leasable Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 5 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 69 Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.71 2.03 - 5.16 1.83 Data Plot and Equation Caution,Use Carefully-small sample size 600 / X 500 --- ---- - ---•--- - ------ -- •- / W400 - - -- •-- - • --- -- - - - -- - - - ---- - - - --- - ' U CD 300 -- •- --- - - -- -- - - - - - > ,' - - • - • - -- • -- - -- • - --- a) c0 A 200 - - - - --- - -- - --- __ _ __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _____ X 100 - - .... .. .. .. . .. .. ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . X X / 0 0 100 200 300 X=1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ---- .; -' Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T=2.40(X)+21.48 R2=0.98 Trip Generation,7th Edition 1339 Institute of Transportation Engineers APPENDIX D TN. 880.291 8755 gn Fax 800.291 8757 c 6 traffle•an�irt�ara•planners V, aurvay9ra•'landscape archltacto• gig 425 SuflWn Avenut.PO Box 1167.South Windsor,conme0eut 06074 PROAR1D FOR, Scott Leonard 1-15 Suckland Road South Wfhdsor dt Manchastor, CT COMBINED WEEKDAY P.M PEAK N.T.S Z I`l > W W Q Z= J m= 160 10065 53 172 458 197 246 1296 1745 . 1745 396 1226 � i F- 664 BUCKLAND 1786 BUCKLAND 1725 ROAD 166 - 32 86 371 -" 1249 -� 1 45 853 -► -� 25 78 176 504 221 737 0351 251 238 a QQ QX Q Q w w m Q Q J N= Q J TN. $00.291 8755 Fax 860.291 8757 gn to civil 6 traffic•anginaars•planners turvayora•landecapo architects•sia 425 Sullivan Avenue,PO Box 1157. South Windsor,ConniCttout 08074 PWARW talk Scott Leonard 1-15 Buckland Road South Windsor do Manchastir, CT COMBINED SATURDAY PEAK N.T.S Z j U i Q Of J Y OJ rJN Z= m J 195 158 125 97 1059 1878 1878 335822 273 605 L 722 1052 847 BUCKLAND 201 L — BUCKLAND 1903 ROAD 268---� 40 1366 15-2 _ 581 ---►- � —� 77 40 858 —�- —� 72 141 542 251 715 � 0471 445 355 Z0 QQ a� Q z ¢�- F— Q U J `1 a.Q m 0 i—(n Q J_ N= Q J CL z APPENDIX E Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES �:4 tee► .� f 4 s fkly- Lj*I)Y•r 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations + ,�,� , , ,� tt Volume(vph) 348 251 `238 197 458 171 664 1214 246 359 846 731 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 600 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 ' 1 2 Tape%r Length(ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1 25 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.850 0.850 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow{prot) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Flow,(perm)` 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 _ 3433; 3539 158-3 Right Turnon Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd Flow(RTOR) 283 186 127 ` 474 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 532 683 449 420= Travel Time(s) 12.1 15.5 10.2 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 6 84 0.84 0.92 0.9Z 0.02 0.93 , 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj.Flow(vph) 414 299 283 214 498 186 714 1305 265 403 951 821 Shared Lane.Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 414 299 283 214 498 186 714 1305 265 403 951 821 EnterBloeked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Metlian Wdfh(ft) 24. 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor. 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1'00 1.0D 1.00 1 AO 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 g Number of petectors 1 2 1 1 , 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leatling Detector O 20 100 20 20 1'0 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posifion(ftj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 - 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex .CI+Ek CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ez CI+Ex CI +@c CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Defector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 O.D 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Qelay(s) 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 S ze(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T A_Type- Prot Free Prot Free Prot Free Prot .! Free Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 5 6 2 Permitted Phases Free Free Free Free Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 1 5 6 2 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES cl v Lr(c.�, f (Yg �'1` tjt/► ,t 7/7/2009 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8 0 26.6 8.0 20.0 . 8.5 20.0 10.0` 20.0 Total Split(s) 22.0 33.0 0.0 22.0 33.0 0.0 33.0 39.0 0.0 26.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(°lo) 18.3°10 27.5% 0.0% 18.31 27.5% 0.0% 27.5% ;32.5% > 0.0%'` 21.7% 26.7% 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 18.0 28.0 18.0 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 Yellow Time(s) 30 3.0 3.0 3.0: 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0;0 P.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag.: Lead -Lead. Lag Lag: Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 30 3:0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None 1NaIk Time(s} 5.0 &0 5.0 O Flash Dont Walks 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls(#1hr) p 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 16.7 25.7 109.8 12.2 21.2 109.8 26.4 34.3 109.8 18.4 27.3 109.8 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.15 0.23 1.00 0.11 019 1.00 024 . 0.31 1.00 0.17 0.25 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.36 0.18 0.56 0.73 0.12 0.86 1.18 0.17 0.70 1.08 0.52 control Delay 57.7` 37.1 02 53.1 48.7. 0,2 52.4 126.2 0.2 -50 9 95.3 1.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay; 57.7 37:1 , 02 53.1 48.7 , 0.2 52.4 T26.2 0.2 50.9 95.3 1.2 LOS E D A D D A D F A D F A Approach Delay 35.2 - 39.7 88.5 51.6 Approach LOS D D F D 90fh%ile Green'(s) 18.0= 29.7 163 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 90th%ile Term Code Max Hold GapMax Max Max Max Max 70t1 °/otle Green(s) ` 18.0 28.4 13.9 24.3 29.0 34.0 21,0 27.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Max Max Hold Max ti0fh.°file Green(s) 18.0 27.5 12 4 21.9 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 50th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Max Max Hold Max 30tft,%ile Green(s) , 16.7 24.3_, 10:8 184 25.4 34:0 17.4 27.0 - -30th%ile Term Code Gap Hold- Gap Gap Gap Max Hold Max 10th'�Ioile.Green(sj 13.2 19.3 8.5 14:6 20.3 34:0 12.5 27:2 10th%ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Hold Sfops(vph) 318 ; 20- Q 180 413 0 599 967 0 327 693 0, Fuel Used(gal) 7 4 1 4 9 1 13 41 1 7 23 3 CO Emissroris(g/hr) 5110 283_ 70 262 .647 64 889 28.50 61 468 1509 180 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 99 55 14 57 126 12 173 555 12 91 313 35 VOC Emissions(g/hr) 118 661. 16 68 150 15 206 661 14 109.- -, 373 42 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 50th-(ft)f 01 77 182 0 254 �-624 0 142 -427 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 201 132 0 119 240 0 #370 #818 0 204 #590 0 Intemal Link Dist(ft) 452 ` 603 369 340 Tum Bay Length(ft) 600 600 BaseCa�aciy{v�h)__ 567 922 1583 1583 -S62 879 - 1583 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap;Reductn 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 2 Lanes,(Volumes, Timings ( P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES 7/7/2009 NEW Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.32 0.18 0.38 0.55 0.12 = 0.78 1.18 0.17` 0.61 1.08 0.52 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 109.8 Natural Cycle:90 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 lnterseetion Signal Delay:60.6 Intersection'LOS:E Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis,Period(min),15 90th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 70th%pile Actuated 0ycle: 116,3 50th%ile Actuated Cycle: 113.9 30th%ile Actuated Cycle:1 05.5 10th%ile Actuated Cycle:93.3 Volume°exceeds capacity,,queue is theoretically infinite., Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95fh.pecentite volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:Int 1 01 o2 03 —► 04 05 o6 07 �1-- o$ Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES La�Lr l H��' l (� �� 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations► , Volume(vph) 0 221 0 1733 1714 86 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util:.Factor 1.00 100 100 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Flt,Permitted Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 527 420 460 Travel Time(s) 120 9.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 240 0 1884 1863 93 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Ftow(vph) 0 240 0 1884 1863 93 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Leit, Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 24 24 Link Offsef(ft) . 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two vuay Left Turri Lane. Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type:,Unsignalizetl Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7%° ICU Level of Service C Analysis,Period(min)15 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES {z r L f el i4j C�_Z-S"4 r,A j, 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations #40tt Volume(vph) 78 176 504 65 100 160 396 1284 53 166 1233 45 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Utif.Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 095 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.995 Fit Protected 0.985 0.950 0.997 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 3486 1583 1681 1764 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3522 0 Fit Permitted 0.985 0.950 0.997 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 3486 1583 1681 1764 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3522 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 104 59 56 3 Link.Speed(mph) 30 _ 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 636 834 580 451 Travel Time(s) 14.5 19.0 13.2 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj Flow(vph) - 95 215 615 71 110 176 408 1324 55' 178 1326 - 48 Shared Lane Traffic(%) 10% (a Group-Flow VP 0 310 615 64 117 176 , 408 1324 55_ 178 A374 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left , Left Right, Left Left -Right Left Left Right' Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 - Link Offset(f#j_ 0, 24 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane - Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(rnph) 15 9 15 15 Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 De#actor Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 . 0 De#actor 1 Size(ft) 20 50 50 50 5t) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Cl+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1-Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) , 0.0 0;_0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Taut TYpe, Split pt+oy Split pt+ov Prot pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Permitted Phases- Detector Phase 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) , 8.0 8.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 21.0. 8.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 13.0 59.0 16.0 16.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 84.0 23.0 45.0 0.0 Tota(Split-(%) 10.$%: 10.8% 49.2% 13.3% 13:3% 325% 38.3% 56.7% 70.0% 19.2% 37.5% ' 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 42.0 63.0 19.0 40.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.0. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Lost Time Adjust(s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 ` 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2' 0.2 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time(s) 50 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0' Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 ;0 0 0: 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 9.0 44.6 9.9 9.9 28.2 35.6 69.8 78.7 14.3 48.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0;37 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.30 0.58 0.66 0.12 0.40: v/c Ratio 1.19 0.94 0.46 0.81 0.42 0.40 0.64 0.05 0.84 0.96 Control Delay 163 6 49.8 62.7 90.4 27.2 U91 19.7 1.3 82.6 53.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1636 49'.8 62.7 90.4 27.2 33.9 19.7 1.3 82.6 531 _. LOS F D E F C C B A F D Approach Delay 879 54.3 22.4 56.5 Approach LOS F D E 90tti%ile Green(sj: 9.0 9.0 - 12.0 12.0 42.019.0 40.0 90th%ile Term Code_ Max Max Max Max Max Coord Max Coord 70th%ile Green(sj 9,0: 9.0 92.0 12,0- 42.0 64.7 17.3 40.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord Gap Coord 5t?th%Ile Green�s)_ _ 9.0 9.0 10.9 10.9 37.$ 68,3 14.8 45.3 50th%ile Term Code Max Max Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord 30th°lode Green.(s) 9.0 9.0 6-8 8:8 32.5. 73:0 12.2 52.7 30th%ile Term Code Max Max Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord 1 Oth%ile Green(s) 9.0 9.0 57 5.7 23.8 79.9 8 4 64.5 10th%ile Term Code Max Max Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord St©PS(vPh) 206_ 330 54 100 86. 301 845 5 161 _` 997 Fuel Used(gal) 11 9 1 3 2 6 16 0 4 24 GO Emissions(gfhr)` 759 659 ' 99 223 168 43$ 1092 20 298 1664 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 148 128 19 43 33 84 212 4 58 324 UOC Emissions(g/hr) 176' 153 23 52 39 100 253 5 69 = 386 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 50th(ft) �152 274 50 94 T4 126 353 0 136 �60D Queue Length 95th(ft)- #215 300 97 #177 134 161 478 9 208 #809 Intetrral L'mk Dist(ft) 556' 754 500 371 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vphj 26.1 733 168 176 467 1202 2058 1084 280 1425 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn_ 0 0 . p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Ratio 1.19` 0.84 0.38 0:66 0.38 034 0.64 0.05 0.64 0.96 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cyele Length- 120 Offset:60(50%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 6 Lanes,, Volumes, Timings P.M. BACKGROUND VOLUMES �y 7/7/2009 Natural Cycle:90' Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.19 Intersection Signal Delay:49.4 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 82 8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Int 01 m2 m3 t m4 05 06 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 7 APPENDIX F Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations Volume(4.0h) 466 445 355 273 822 330 847 1042 605 556 848 710 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 600 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) ` 25 25 25 25 25 1 25 25 25 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3433 3539 1 1583 3433 3539 1583 34337 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Sa#tl.Flow(perm) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 `; 1583 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sattl.Flo RTOR) 4231 , 252 365 453 Link Speed(mph) 3030 30 _ 30: Link-Distance(ft) 532 683 449 420 Travel Time(s) 12.1 15.5 10.2 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0,84 0 84 0 92 . Q. 0.9-2 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj.Flow(vph) 555 530 423 297 893 359 911 1120 651 625 953 798 Shared LaOe.Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 555 530 423 297 893 359 911 1120 651 625 953 798 Enter Blocked"Intersection N0 No No No No No No No No No.` No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Metlian Witlth(ft) 24 24- 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalkdth(ft)" 4616 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor, 1A0' 1.00 1.00 100 100. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 g 15 g Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector(ft) 20 100 20 20 - 100 20 20 100 20 20 100_ 20 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex GI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.- ` 0.0 O.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Off 0.0 0.0 O.0 O.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6efector 1 Reiay(s) 0.0 O:O 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0 0:0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 gq Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Free Prot Free Prot Free Prot Free Protected Phases 7 4 3 g 1 5 6 2 Permattetl Phases Free Free Free Free Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 1 5 6 -2 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7/7/2009 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(sj 80 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.5 ' 20.0 10;0 20.0 Total Split s P ( ) 22.0 33.0 0.0 22.0 33.0 0.0 33.0 39.0 0.0 26.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 18.3% 27.5% 0.0% 18 3% 27.5% 0.6% 27.5% 32.5% U. to 21.75/6 26.7%' 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 18.0 28.0 18.0 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 Yellow Time N 3,0 3:0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Losf Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0_0" 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 Recall Mode None_ None None None None None None None 1Nalk Time(s) 5.0 5.0" Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0'_ = p- Act Effct Green(s) 18.0 30.7 120.0 15.3 28.0 120.0 29.0 34.0 120.0 21.0 27.0 120.0 Actuated g/C Ratio . 0.1.5- 0.26 1.00. 0.)3. 023 1.00 D.24 0.28 v/c Ratio 1.08 0.58 0.27 0.68 1.08 0.23 1.10 1.12 0.41 1.04 1.20 0.50 Control Delay 110.2 42.6 0.4 581 99.2 0.3 104.1 " .106.3 0.8 95.6 141.5 ' _- 1:1 Queue Delay 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tcfal Delay; 110.2: 42.6 0.4 581. 99.2, 0,3 " 104.1 106 3 0.8 95.6, 141.5 1.1' LOS F D A E F A F F A F F A App_toach Delay 55:7 68 4 79.9 - 82:3 Approach LOS E -E . E F _ 90tk %tIe Green(sj 18,0 28:0 18.0 280 29.0- 34.0 210 27.0 -- 90th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max 70th°lode Green(s) 18.0 28 T 173 28Q 29.E 34.D. 21.0 27.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 50t1 °bile Green(s)" 18:0 ' 30.4 15.6 . 28 0 29.0. 34.0. 21.0 27.0 50th%Ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 30th%ile Green(s) "' 18.0 32.1 1.3.9 2t30 29.0" 34.0 21.0 __> 27.0 30th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 10th%ile Green(s) 18.0 34.5 11.5 : 280 29.0 34.0 21.0 27A" 10th%Ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max StoP_s(vPfi)_ 403 385 0 256 718 0 76 900 0 490 70Z " 0 Fuel Used(gal) 15 8 2 6 25 2 25 31 2 15 31 2 CO Emissions(g/hr)_ 102� 548 105 426 .1744 124 1746 2179 155 1073 2175 174 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 199 107 20 83 339 24 340 424 30 209 423 34 VOC Emissions(g/hr) 237 127 24_ 99 404 29 405 505 36 249 504 4:0 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue.Length 50th(ft)' -247 190 ` 0 114` 4 0 -412 -524 0 -269 470 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #321 235 0 158 #536 0 #540 #660 0 #379 #592 0 Infernal Link Dist;(ft). 452 603 369 340 Turn Bay Length(ft) 600 600 Base Capari (vph) 51.5 -- 907 = 1583 515- 820- 1583 830 1003 1583 .-601 -796 1583 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ack Spilib Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 p Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7m2oo9 WON Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced is Ratio 1.08 0.58 0.27 0.58 1.08 0.23 1.10 1.12 0.41 1.04 1.20`` 0.50 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Aetuatetl Cycle Length- 120 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.20 Intersection Signal Delay:73.9 Intersection LDS:E Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min)15 90th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 70thActuated Cycle: 10 - - 50th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 30th%ileActuated CycIe: 120 10th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 ~Volumeexceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CAW**percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:Int 14\ m1 o2 a3 "-M" o4 �1-- m5 m6 ''+ m7 m$ Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 0 251 0 1838 1863 152 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 160 100 0.05 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Fit Protected Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 17. Perrnittetl Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 527 420 460 Travel Time(s) 12.0 9.5 40.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9-2 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 273 0 1998 2025 >165 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow.(vph) 0 273 0 1998 2025 165 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment " Left`, Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 24 24 Crosswalk Width(ft) - 16 �= ' 16 16 Two wayfeftvTurn Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed.(mph) _ = 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other ji Cor trol,Type:Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min}15 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes � �4 �� /1���r•: ctc 7/7/2009 gisame MINIMUM Lane Configurations ► 11 tt r 1 0 volume(vph) 72 141 542 125 158 195 702 1039 97 268 1346 77 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanevtil.Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 AvOO 0.95' 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.992 F)t Protected 0.983 0.950 0996 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 0 3479 1583 1681 1763 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3511 0 FIt.Permitted 0.983 0.950 0996 0.950 0,950 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 3479 1583 1681 1763 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3511 0 Right Tum=on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 44 94 82 5 Link Speed(mph) 30 -30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 636 834 580 451 Travel Time(s) 14.5 a 9.0 13.2 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.9-7 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj.Flow(vph) 88' 172 661 187 174 214 724 0711447 83 Shared Lane Traffic(°/°) 10% _ Lane Group Flow(vph) - 0 260 A 6 123 188 214 724, 1071 288 1530_ 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left_ Left Right Left Left Right Left__ Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24 t ink Offset(ft) .. 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tum Lane - Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 Turning Speed(mph) 15 - 9_ 15 9 15 -9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DetecforTemplate Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left "- Thru ;Right Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft), 0 0"' 0- 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Sze(ft) 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 _ Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Dhannei - Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t)etector 1-Queue.(s) 0,0 0:0' 0.0 0.0 Q O _ 0:0 0:0 0.0 _0 0.0 0:0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turin Type Split pt-- Split pt+ov Prot pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Perrn�#ted Phases - - _ Detector Phase 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Suvitcti Phase. Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 8,0 15.0 15 0 9.0 21.0 8.0 21.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 13.0 59.0 16.0 16.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 84.0 23.0 45.0 0.0 Total;Split(°fo) 10.8% '10.8%= 49.2%' 13.3% 13.3% 32.5% 38.30/d 56.7% 70.0�/0 1'9.2°/0 37.5°10 ` 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 42.0 63.0 19.0 40.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7/7/2009 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0 0 0.0 0:0 0,10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag', Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 0.2 0 2 0 2 Recall Mode None None 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2` None None None C-Max None C-Max VI/aik Time(s) 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 5.0 5.0 Pedestrian_Calls(#/hr) p p 11.0 11.0 Act Effct Greens " 0 0 0 0' O- 9.0 49.5 12.0 12.0 35.0 40.5 63.0 74.0 19.0 41.5 Actuated g/C Ratio- 0.08 0.41 0.90 010 Q.29 0.34 0.52 0.62 . 0.16 ` 0.35 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.73 1.07 0.41 0.63 0.58 0.10 1.03 1.26 Coritrol Delay 110.4 58;1 77.5 138.3 35.9 21.0 1.7 111.0 156.2 ` Queue Delay - . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total_Delay 110.4 581 775 138.3 21.3 35.9 21.0 " 1.7 111.0 156.2 LOS F E Approach Delay._ 72.8 E F C D C A F F Approach LOS 763 _-. -- _25.7, _"149.1 90th D/oils Green(s) 9.0 9.0 E C F 90th%ile Term Code 12 0 A2 0 42.0 63.0 19.0 40.0 Max Max ax Max Max Max Coord 70tt %Ile Green.s 12A 120 42.0 63.0" Max Coord 190 _ 40.0 70th%Ile Term Code Max Max Max Max 50tfi_%Ile Green,s Max Coord Max Coord 9,O 120 42 0 63 0 50th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Coord 30th-Tolle Greens Max 12.0 Max Max Coord 12.Q 12.0 41.7 63:0_ - 30th%ile Term Code Max Max 1.9.0 40.3 Max Max Gap Coord Max Coord 10th_%ile green 12.0_ 120 f s 34:6 63:0 19.0 47.4 10th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Gap Coord Max Coord Stops(vphj 186 421 102_ . 139 87. 572 `680 10 229 1118 Fuel Used(gal) 7 _ 11 3 7 3 11 13 1 8 56 CQEmissions f9/hr) 480_' 798 214 468 181 8t?2 901 37 578 3946" NOx Emissions /hr f9 ) 93 155 42 91 35 156 175 7 112 768 VOC_EmlSsions(g/hr)> 111 185 50 " 108- 42" 186 209 9 134 ' 914 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 107 .314 72 236 286 3 238 803 Queue Length 95- -(ft) #171 #431 #198 #327 143 300 351 14 #414 #945 In#emal Llnk Dist(ft) rA 556 7 ; Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 371 Base Capacity(vph), 281 i698, 168 176 528 1202 1858 1008 280 1.219 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spilltiack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0` 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio . 1.00 0.95 0.73 -. 1.07 0. '1 0.60 0.58 0.10 Tt03i 1.26 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 _ Ac#aatetl�yele-L-ength:120 Offset:60(50%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Satruday Background Volumes 7/7/2009 Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1,26 Intersection Signal Delay:82.7 Intersection LOS:F Intersection Capacity Utilization 92,4% ICU Level of.Service`F Analysis Period(min)15 Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95fh percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Int ! al 02 4 o3 t o4 05 o6 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 7 APPENDIX G Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES �t< it .� e4" r ES 7/7/2009 v. Lane Configurations , tt tt V61ume(vph) 351 251 238 197 458 172 664 1226 246 371 853 737 11 tt Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 St©rage Length(ft) 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 ` 0 4 600 60b Taper Length(ft} 25 1 2 1 2 1 2 25 25 25 25` 1 Lane Util.Factor 25 25 25 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.850 0.850 0.850 Satd..Flow rot ` 0.950 0.950 0.950 (P ). 3433 3539 1583 3433 ;35. 1 1583 3433 3539` 1583 3433 3539 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow erm 0.950 0.950 (P ) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 '` 1.583 M.33 ' 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 283 Link Speed(mph) 187 126 Yes 474 E 30 rik Distance(ft) = 532 30 30 30 Travel Time(s) 683 . _ 449 42U 12.1 15.5 10.2 Peak Hour Factor' - 0.84 0;84� 0:84 0 92, 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.89 Ad Flow v h J ( P ) 418 299 283 214 498 187 714 1318 265 417 958 828 dared Lane Traffic(°to) _ Lane Group Flow(vph) 418 299 283 214 498 187 714 1318 265 417 958 828 Enter Blocked Intersection No No_ No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right eft Left Right IVlediandth(ft} 24 2 Link Offset(ft) 4 , 24. 0 = 0 - 24 Crosswalkdth(ft) 16 0 0 Two way Left Turn Lane 16 16 16 HeedwayFactor. 1.00 1.0t} 1.00 100 100 9.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 ' 1..00: 1.00 Tuming Speed(mph) 15 9 15 Nurnberof Detectors 9 15 9 15 g 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1. Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector(ft), 20 1 Ot) 20 20 100 2q 20 10Q 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector(ft) p 0 0 0 Defector 1 Rosifion{ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size ft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 O 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 T e 6 20 20 6 20 YP CI+Ex CI+Ex- CI+E CI+Ez C(+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex . CI+Ex CI+Ex - CI+ ' CREx Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend s O 0.0 Q.O= 0.0 oQ, OQ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue s O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.-- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 , 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)_ 94 9494 6 - 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex 6 Detector 2 Channel CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Extend(s) 0.0 Tum T 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prot Free:; , Prot Free Prot Protected Phases 7 4 Free Prot Free Permttetl Phases 3 8 1 5 6 2 Detector Phase Free Free Free 7 4 3 8 1 5 Free 6 2 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES -' 1z It 7/7/2009 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.5 20.0 10.0 20:0 Total Split(s) 22.0 33.0 0.0 22.0 33.0 0.0 33.0 39.0 0.0 26.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split.(%) 18.3% 27.5% 0.0% 18.3% ,27.5% 0.0% '27.5% 32.5%` 0.0% 21.7%0 26.7% 0.0%Maximum Green(s) 18.0 28.0 18.0 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 yellow.Time(s) -3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 3 0 3 0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Tune Adjust(s) 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag , Lead, Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time{s). 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5:0 Flash Dont Walk(s) I I.0 11.6 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian_Calls(#/hr) 0 0 - 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 16.8 25 8 110.0 12.3 21.2 110.0 26.4 34.3 110.0 18.5 27.4 110.0 Actuated g/C.Ratio 0.1.5 023 100 0.11 f 100 0.24 0.31' 1.00 0.17 0.25 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.36 0.18 0.56 0.73 0.12 0.87 1.19 0.17 0.72 1.09 0.52 Confrol pe!a 58 0 , . 37.1 Q.2 53.2 48.8 Q.2 52.6. , 131.9 0.2 ; 51,7' 97.4' 1.2 Queue Delay - - 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totai Relay 580 .37.1 0.2 53.2 48.8 0 2= 52:6. 131.9 0.2 51.7, 9 1:2 7.4 LOS E D A D D A D F A D F 2 Approach Delay. 3 Approach LOS 52.p 6 D F D 90th%de green(s) 18,0 297 16.3„ 28.0 29.0 34:0 21.0 27:0 90th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 7pth%ile;Green(s) 18.0 28,4" 13.9 24,3 29.0 34:fl 21.0 17.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Hold GapGap p Max Max Max Max SOth°lode Green(s) 18.0 27.5 12.4 21.9 " 29.0 ' 34:0 21:0 50th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Max Max Hold Max Ot °/pile Green(s)`` 16.9 24.5 10.8 18.4 25.4 34.0 17.4 27.0 30th%ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap _ P p Gap Max Hold Max 10th%ile Green(s) 13.4_ 19.5 8.5 14.6 20.3 34:0 12.9 27.6 10th%ile Term Code Gap Hold Ga Gap P p Gap Max Gap Hold Stops{vPl?) 320 201 0 180 413 0 600 972 0 339 697 0 Fuel Used(gal) 7 4 1 4 9 1 13 43 1 7 24 3 CO Emissions(g/hr) 515 283 70 292 648 . 64 891 2977 61 489 1647 182 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 100 55 14 57 126 13 173 579 12 95 320 35 UOG Emissions(g/hr) 119 6t 16 68 150 15 MIT 690 14 113 382 42 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 153 95 0 77 fl ' 0 254 -634 0 147 -432 0 Queue Length 951h(ft) 204 132 0 119 240 0 #370 #831 0 210 #596 Internal LOZist(ft) 452 603 0 369 Tum Bay Length(ft) 600 340 600 Base Ca acit v h - P Y{P ) 566 `__ 920__ _158.3 566 908 1533 -9 -2 a 103 -1583 661 -880 15-83 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Spillback CaA Reductn 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.33 0.18 0.38 0.55 0.12 0.78 1.19` 0.17 0.63 1.09 052 milli Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length:110 Natural Cycle:90 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:1.19 Intersection Signal Delay:62.3 , Intersection LOS:E Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min)15 90th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 70th%He Actuated Cycle:116.3 50th%ile Actuated Cycle:113.9 30th%ile Actuated CycIe.105:7 10th%ile Actuated Cycle:93.9 Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. _95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may 6e longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:Int 01 m2 a3 — o4 } m6 i— 1 m5 r o7 08 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES 717/2009 Lane Configurations �► Volume(vph) 0 221 0 1745 1725 86 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 100 100 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Fit Protected Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 9583 Fit Permitted Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Link Speed(mph)' 30 3Q. 30 Link Distance(ft) 527 420 460 Travel Time(s) 12.0 9:5: 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 240 0 1897 1875 93 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Gioup Flow(vph) 0 240 0 18971 1875 93 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right , Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 24 24 Link Offset(ft) . 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turri Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Tummg Speed(mph) ., _; 15' 9 13 g Sign Control Stop Free Free Mill N Area Type: Other CoritrolType:Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min}15 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations 1/olume v h �`T ( P ) 78 176 504 65" 100 160 396 1.396 53 166- 1249 45 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lae U ntiL.Factor 0.95 095 100 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00. 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.995 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 . 0997 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(P rot ) 0 3486 1583 1681 1764 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3522 0 FIf.Permitted 0.985 0950 0997 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 3486 1583 1681 1764 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3522 0 Right Tum on Red " Yes. Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 104 Yes 51 b5 3 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 636 834 580 451 Travel Time{s) 14.5 19.0 13.2 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 A j."Flow(vph} 95 215 615 71 1-0 176 408" 1439 55 178 1343 48 Shared Lane Traffic(%) 10% W Group Flow(vph}-" 0 310 61'5 64 117 176 408 1439 55 178 1391 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane A6gninent Left Left: Right - Left. Left Right Left Left Right, Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 LmkOffset(ft) 0 24 24 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 - 16"0. 16 Two way Left Tum Lane " Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TurimgSpeect frnph}_ 15 _ 9 15 9 15 9" 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Detector7emplate Left Thru . Right Left Tt►ru Right `Left Thru Riglu Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detectgr.(ft) ' 0 p 0 . 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 on(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Defector 1 Size(ft) 20 50= 50 5Q 50 50 60 50 50 50 50 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector too"(s) 0.0 0.Q OA; 0'0 0 0 " . 0 0 0.0 . 00, 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tum TYPe Split pt+ov Split" p t+ov Prot pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 3 3 35 4 4 4 9 5 2 24 1 6 Switcfl Phase_ Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Munn um Split'(s) " & 8.0 15.0 15.Q 9.0 21.0 8.0 21.0 Total Split s p 13.0 13.0 59.0 16.0 16.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 84.0 23.0 45.0 0.0 Tofal;Split"(°/) 10.8% .1.0.8% 49.2% 113.% 13.3% 32.5_% 38.8% 56.7% 70 0% 19.2% 37.5% 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 42.0 63.0 19.0 40.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.0 - 3.0 3:0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES a+e.1,r tt 4 ek 1 e.j i 7/7/2009 Lost Time Atljust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag ` Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0,2` 0.2 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time(s) 5.0 5:0 5.0 5.0 5.-0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.6 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 9.0 44.6 9.9 9.9 28.2 35.6 69.8 78.7 14.3 48.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 637, (1.08 D.O8 0.24 0.30 0.58 0.66 0.12 0.40 v/c Ratio 1.19 0.94 0.46 0.81 0.43 0.40 0.70 0.05 0.- 0.98 Control Delay 163.6 49.8 62.7 90.4 29.2 33.9 21.2 1.3 82.6 55.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To,al Delay 1636 49.890.4 29,2 33.9 . 21.2 1.3 82.6 55.3 LOS F D E F C C C A F E Appfoach Delay 87 9 23.3_ Approach LOS F E 90th%ile Green, s E ( ): 9,0 9 0 . 12.0 12.0 42:0 63.0;. 19.0 40.0' 90th%Ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord Max Coord 70th%ile Green(s) 9.4 9.0 12 0 12.0 42.0 64.7. 17.3 40.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord 50th%ile Greens Gap Coord O 9.tZ 9,0 M 10 9 37 8^ 14.8- 50th%ile Term Code Max Max o Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord 30th kale Green s _ 32.5: - 73>0 12.2 30th%ile Term Code 52.7 Max Max Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord 40th%ile Green(s) 9.0 9.0 57 5.7 23.8 79.9 8.4 64.5 10th%ile Term Code Max Max Gap Gap Gap Coord Gap Coord Stops(vph) 206 330 : 54_ 100 92 301 969 5- 1 1005 Fuel Used(gal) 11 9 61 1 3 3 6 18 0 4 25 CO Emissions(gmr) 759 659 99 223 175 433 1236 2U 298 1725 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 148 128 19 43 34 84 240 4 58 336 UOC Emissons.(g/hr) 176, 153 23 52 41 100 286 5 69 400 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length SDth(ft) 4152 274 50 94 80; 126 405 0 136 �615 Queue Length 95th(ft) #215 300 97 #177 139 161 546 9 208 #824 Infernal. in -.Dist(ft) 556' 754 500 371 Turn Bay Length(ft) - Base Capacity(kph) 261 733 168 76 461 1202 2058 1084 280 1425 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spilltaek Cap Reductn -0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.19 .0.84 0.38 0.66 0.38 0.34 0.70 0.05 0.64 0.98 AreaType: Otf%er Cycle Length: 120 A�terated Cycle Length:120 - - _ - r -- -- - Offset:60(50%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Natural Cycle:100 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.1.19 Intersection Signal Delay:49.9 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 83..3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period(min)15 volume exceeds capacity,queue'is theoretically;infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. #_ 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Int #01 02 03 'fit' o4 05 06 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings P.M. COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 0 25 0 1745 1786 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util,Factor 1.00 100 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.865 0.997 Fit Protected Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1.611 0 3539 3529 0 Flt Permifted Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3529 0 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 530 580 Teavel Time(s) 8 8 12.0 13.2 Peak Hour Factor _ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(kph) 0 27 0 T897 1941 35 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Greup Flow,(vph) _t) 27 0 1897 1976 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No La�eAlignment, Left Right, Left Geft Left Right_ Median Width(ft) p 0 0 Link Offset(ft) U 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 1616 Tuvo way Left Tum Lane - Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Tu_rrung Speed(mph) 15 9 15 g Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignahzetl Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.4%° ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min)15 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 8 APPENDIX H Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations ++ +t r Volume(vph), 471 445 355 273 -822 335 847 1052 ' 605 581 858 715 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 600 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util,Factor, 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0:85Q Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Setd,Flow(prot) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 ` 3539' 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Flow(perm) : 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 W3 3539` 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow{RTOR) 423 T 256 361 453 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Lirk Distance(ft):: 532 683 449 420 Travel Time(s) 12.1 15.5 10.2 9.5 Peak HourFaetor 0,84_ 0.84 0.84 0.92 092 , 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89_: 089 Adj.flow(vph) 561 530 423 297 893 364 911 1131 651 653 964 803 Strand lane Traffic;(%) - Lane Group Flow(vph) 561 530 423 297 893 364 911 1131 651 653 964 803 Enfer Blocked intersection No: No Ne No No No No No No Na ' No _ No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) - 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) p 0 - 0 0.;. CrosswalkWidth(ft) 96 16 16 - 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_.00 1.00 , 1..00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 g IVuinber of Detectors 1 _ 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Defector(ft} 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ftj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex ` CI+Ex CI+Ez CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex C(+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Deter 1 Extend(s}, 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. : 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Defector-1°Delay(s) 0.0 off 0:0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Sie(ft) 6 fi 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex annel CI+Ex Detector 2:Ch Detector 2 Extend(s)Tum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Type; Prat Free Prof Free Prot Free Prot Free _. . Protected Phases 7 4 - 3 8 1 5 6 2 Permitted Phases Free Free Free Free Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 1 5 g 2 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 80 200 8.0 20.0 18,5 20.0 10.0 20.0° Total Split(s) 22.0 33.0 0.0 22.0 33.0 0.0 33.0 39.0 0.0 26.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 18.3% 27.5% 0.0% 18 3% 27 5% 0.0% 27.5% 32.5% 0.0% 21.7% ` 26.7% 0.0% Maximum Green(s) 18.0 28.0 18.0 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 Y611- Time(s) 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ „ _. All-Red Time(s) 10 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0:0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Whtcte Extension(s) _ 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 ' 10 3.0 3.0 _ 3:0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None .w Tune(s)" 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian_Calls.(#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green(s) 18.0 30.7 120.0 15.3 28.0 120.0 29.0 34.0 120.0 21.0 27.0 120.0 Actuated g1C Ratio, 0.15; 0.26 1.00 0.1.3 023 1:00 D.24 0.28 1.00-_ 0.18 0.22 1.00 v/c Ratio 1.09 0.58 0.27 0.68 1.08 0.23 1.10 1.13 0.41 1.09 1.21 0.51 Control Delay 113.7 42,6 04 58.1 99.2 0.3. 104.1 110 3, 0.8 108.8 146.9 1.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay_ 113.7 42.6 0 4 _ 581 99 2 _ - 0.3. ; 104.1 - 3 " -8 108.8 .146.9. 1.2 LOS F D A E F A F F A F F A Approach Delay 57.2 - 68 2 81.7 68.3 Approach LOS E E F F OWN"*Green(s) 18.6 : 28.0 18`.0 28.0 29 0 34.0 90th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max 7_ "/otle Green(s) 18.0 28.7 17 3 28.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max a0fh%ile Green`(s) 18.0 30.4 15fi 28 0 29 0 34:0 21.0 27.0 50th%ile Term Code_ Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 30t1i%ile Green(s) 18;0 32.1 13 9 28.0 29.0 34:0 2T.0 27.0. 30th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max 10th%ile Green(s) 18.0 34.5 115 2i3.0 29.0 34.0 21.0 27.0 10th%ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Max Max Max Max Max Stops(uph) 406 385 O 256 718 0 736 -904 0 504 711 0 Fuel Used(gal) =15 8 2 6 25 2 25 32 2 18 32 3 CO Emissions(g/hr) 1055 .548 105" 426 1744 126 1'746 2257 155 1227 2264 176 NOx Emissions(g/hr) 205 107 20 83 339 25 340 439 30 239 441 34 VOC Emissions(g/hr) 245 1.127 24 99 404 29 405 ad 36 284. 525 41 Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 50th(ft) -252 190; 0 11.4 �407 0 �412 -534 0 -292 �480 0 - Queue Length 95th(ft) #326 235 0 158 #536 0 #540 #670 0 403 #601 0 lntemal Link Dist(ft) 462 603 369 340 Turn Bay Length(ft) 600 600 B pacity�vph)_ _ 51�_ 907` 1588 515__ �26_ 1583 830 ._-10D3 _1583 _ 601__ 796 . 1583 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timingsf SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES } 7n/2009 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ra#io 109 0.58 0.27 (1.58 1.08 0.23 1.10 1.13 0.41, 1.09 1.21 051 Area Type: L,L L Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: Infers Signal Delay:76.5 Intersection LOS:E Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(►nin)15 90th%ile Actuated Cycle:120 70th%fie�Actuatk ycle:120. 50th%ile Actuated Cycle: 120 30th%ode Actuated`Cycla:120 10th%ile Actuated Cycle:120 Qescnptton:Bui*d Road/Pleasant Valley Road Volume exceeds capacity ,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue.shown is maximum aftertvuo cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer. Queue shown is inaxirn�m aftertw9 cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:Int 01 o2 1 05 o6 o7 +�-- 08 ME Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings r SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 0 251 0 1878 1903 152 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Said.Flow(prot) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3539 1583 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 527 420 460 Trauel Time(s) 1Z.0 9.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 01 273 0 2041 2068 165 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lurie Group Flow(uph) 0 273 0 2041 2068 165 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane/alignment. Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 24 24 Link Of#set(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Leff T r-Lane = _ Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type -Unsgnalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min)15 Description:Buckland Road/Plaza at Buckland Hills Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES ,y-;GIB J71�11W la'ma.r-U 7/7/2009 Lane Configurations � � Volume(vph) 72 141 5421 125 158 195 722 1059 97 268 13�66 77 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor; 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 0 900 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0:983 0.850 0.992 0.950 0.996 0.950" 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 0- 3479 1583 1681 1763 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3511 0 Fit Permitted0983 0.950 0.996 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 0.950 (P ) 0 3479 1583 1681 1763 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 3511 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 43 Yes= Yes Link speed"(mph)' 30 90 82 5 Link Distance(ft) 636 30 30 ` 30 Travel Time(s) 14.5 834 580 451 Peak Hour Factor 19'0 13.2 10:3 0.82 6.82 0.82 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj.Flow(vph) 88 172 661 137 74 ` 214 744 1092 Shared Lane Traffic100" 288 1469 83 (%) - 10% Lane Group Flow{vph) 0 260 661 123 188 214 744 1092 100 288 1552` . 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left " _ Left Right Left Left Right Left' Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 Link Offse#{ft) 0 24 24 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 0. Two way Leff Turn Lane 16 16 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 1 1 9 15 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Detector Template Left- Thru Right Left Thru., Right Left Thru Right. . . Left Thru Leading Detector(ft) Tr 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 g.Detector(ft): p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Defector 1 Size(ft) 20' S0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Detector 1 Type yP CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector.1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 " 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0:0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turd Type Split pt+oy Spit pt+ov Prot pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 Phases g Permitted Detector Phase LL Switch Phase. 3 3 35 4 4 41 5 2 24 1 6 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Splf(s) 8A ' 8.0 15.0 150 4.0 4.0 Total Slit s = 9.0 21.0 &0 21.0 P O 13.0 13.0 59.0 16.0 16.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 84.0 23.0 45.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 10.8% 10.8% 49.2% 13.3% 13.3%0 32.5% 38.3% 56 7% 70:0% 123,0 37.50% 0.0.0 Maximum Green(s) 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 42.0 63.0 19.0 40.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.0 3.0- 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 3.0 3:0 3.0 3.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES bd CwWJ wfwe Y :, e 7/7/2009 Lost Time Adjusf;{s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0` 0:0 0;0 00 00 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead ;Lag Lag Lead' Lag, Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 p 0 Act Effct Green(s) 9.0 49.5 12.0 12.0 35.0 40.5 63.0 74.0 19.0 41.5 Actuatedg/C Ratio 0:08 0.41 0.10 0.10 0.29 0.34 0.52 0.62 0.16 0.35 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.73 1.07 0.41 0.64 0.59 0.10 1.03 1.27 Control Delay 11'0.4 58.1. 77.5 138.3 22.0 36.4 21.2 1.7` 111.0` 163:7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 110.4, 58.1 77.5 138.3 ` 22.0 36.4 21.2 1.7 111.0 163.7 LOS F- E E F C D C A F F Approach_Delay -- 72.9. 76.6 155.5 Approach LOS E E C F 90th°I°ile Green{s) 9 0 9 0 (2.0 12.0 42.0 63.6 19-0 40.0 90th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord Max Coord loth%ite Green(s) 40 9.0 12.0 92.0 42.0, 63,0 19.0 40.0 70th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord Max Coord 50fh toile Green(s,) s0 9 0 12.0. 72.0 _ 42.0 50th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Coord Max Coord 30. %ile Green fs), 9 0 9.0 12.0 12.0 41.7 63.0 19.0' 30th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Gap Coord Max Coord 10th%ile green(s) 90 90 12A 12.0 34.6 63.0 19.0 47.4 -- 10th%ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Gap Coord Max Coord Stops(arphJ ` 186 421 102 139 90 592 700 1.0 229 1128 Fuel Use 7 11 3 7 3 12 13 1 8 59 CO Emissions(g/hr) 480 799 214 468 184 831 925 37 578 4153' NOx Emissions(g/hr) 93 155 42 91 36 162 180 7 112 808 UQC Emiss--io- ns(g/hr) 111 185 50, 108 43 193 _214 9_ - - - - Dilemma Vehicles(#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 30th(ft), 167. 314 -98 �169 -74 244 294 '3 �238 �-822 Queue Length 95th(ft) #171 #433 #198 #327 146 310 361 14 #414 #964 Internal Link Dist(ft) 556 754 500 371 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 2611 698 168 UP525 120 1858 1008 280 1219 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sp ll k Cap Reductn 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced 4/c Ratio 1.00 0.95 0.73 1 07 0.41 0.6Z 0.59 0.10 1.03 1.27 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Offset:60(50%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES 7/7/2009 Natural Cycle:150 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio-1.27 Intersection Signal Delay:85.0 Intersection LOS:F Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min)15 Description:Buckland Road/Tamarack Ave. Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8:Intti 01 f` 02 46 t 84 05 06 Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings SATURDAY COMBINED VOLUMES 0,14 r,cato 7/7/2009 -'W 4\ t Lane Configurations tt Boom Volume(vph) 0 40 0 1818 2015 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.865 0.997 Flt Protected Satd.Flow(prot) 0 1611 0 3539 3529 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1611 0 3539 3529 0 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 530 580 Travel Time(s) 8.8 12.0 13.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) D 43 0 2041 2190 43 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 43 Q 2041 2233 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment, Left Right Left Left. Left Right Median Width(ft)- 0 0 0 Link Offset(ftj . "0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn`Lane _ Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type:Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min}15 Description:Buckland Road/Site Drive Baseline Synchro 7-Light: Report Page 8 IVr) P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:8onalsi .8757 c.com www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL S TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 5erwng Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Marcia Banach Date: 7/13/2009 DPI Project No. 1831 Director of Planning Re: One Buckland Road Town of Soth Windsor Traffic Impact Analysis : WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 10 7/2009 additional copies of Traffic Impact Analysis • These are transmitted as checked below: : ❑ ForApproval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval • ® For your use ❑ Make corrections • [I Submit copies for distribution ® As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Forbids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us • REMARKS: : : SIGNED: CC: Benjamin heeler,RLA,Director of Operations uvvv!;rvrve Phone:(860)623-2064 July0,2009 @NH750134. AFFORD SPRINGS On July 9,2009 at-1:0O pin WESTBROOK APTS All items in storage-units contain household items,unless Space D-37 Stacey W.Felder 22 West Street Eiflgton h1duS Caen otherwise mentioned. _ Contents:. Refrigerator, Stdve, Boxes and Miscellaneous ®y+o-Sa F� Each space to be sold as one lot. Household - w i worn unit in brick garden apt V ace Number J19-26:Ronald S:'Da Journal Inquirer ldr, Total electric Rarrge,retn'g y q 1or,disposal,carpeting,Absolutely" Contents of Unrt Boxes and misc.terns. June 28,2009 cats or dogs BasemenClaundb-1 & high-tech, -te New 2000 s.f.area hay- v r ing loadi Journal inquirer July2,-2009 age.$62S/mo,I year lease.Cal ng dock and drive in Amm Ge door.Ideal for service,distribu- June 25,2009 Y tion, assembly, machine shop, July 2,2009 860-87MI34 _ high tech,etc. - Ca�f��,+B/m V iGiess 2ri�Y� Pueut Nona iRNON 5 Rms. Priv;Vernon @ 86a87�rE1134.nter area$925. Wkdys 871- A public sale of the contents of the storage spaces listed " 9' 40 Eves/Wk-ends 87%697 below will take place.at U-Store-It,2ENFIEL82 Chapel Road,South 190-HaD-InduAve. space; RT - PUBLIC NOTICE Windsor, CT 66074, hone 860289-8355 on 07/09/09 at emon-Briar Knoll Apts„1& '190-Hazard Ave. 5000 sft P ( ) Loadi REQUEST-FOR PROPOSALS 2 BR, private entry pet; n9 dock&drive-in door- O . 12:00 P.M. Each space will be sold as one lot.The following iendly,outdoor pool.Call for ideal for distribution,assembly, goods will be sold: oecials. 860-871-8060 printing, machine shop, etc. The Town of Manchester will receive sealed`proposals in $1700 mo. Jim,860-930-8864 the GeOeral Services'office, Lincoln Center,494 Main St., mon/Rockvilte-1 BR S600 until 2:00 p.m.,July-16,2009 for the following: Library Space Number E120-John Moran-Household goods' r $700+ util Pet friendly. VERNON Industrial Pik Space Number A134-Tomiese Mason-Household ill871-2121 1000/8" sqft. Loading Online Database Services; Library Periodical Sub dock.Tully RE.643-0005. scription Services. The request for proposal packages are goods ndsor Locks i BR$800, 2 available on 4he Town ` webpage at Space Number B169-Edward Strong-Household goods t $900 + utils +2m sec, VERNON PLAZA 83,1000 sq ft Space Number D101-Sheila Williams-Household goods of office or retail www.townofmanchester or Genlsvice/default titm. The fs,no pets 860-654 0157 space. End it Space Number E126-127 Anthony Hams-Household unit Additional space available. Town is an equal opportunity employer and.requires an af- Lots of parking.Petrowsky En- firmative action policy for all-of its.contwactors and vendors goods. -" terprises, 860.836-9294 or p Y t email ask a condition of doing business witti the Town,as per Inquirer r Fed- June al quit JOE@RIGHTTRACFG COM eras Order 11246./-. � July 2,2009 1009 NDSOR LOCKS HUGE. Joumal Inquirer ] / . BR,quiet location,w/w, aP Jul 1,2009 �\ L L/ WNDSOR LOCKSZOW40 BOARD OF APPEALS s,.on site laundry;.ca,deva- r. = ' y s,free heat&hot water$820 July 2,2009 PUBLIC vv D-875-9500.EOH SOMERS, PET FRIENDLY- July 3,2009 Ranch on Dead end sL 4 bdrm, The Windsor Locks Zoning Board of Appeals will hold a NDSOR LOCKS-Prof: ambi- 2ba �g door to.fenced yard. PUBLIC NOTICE public hearing on Monday,July6,2009 of 7:00 mat 50 :e,2 BR,C/A,elevator,faun- L, fr, fp, & woodstove, sky SOUTH VANDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION p H/HW incl.$795.875-9905. lights&patio.$1650/mo.PET$ - Church Street,Windsor Locks,CT 66096 for the following: OK>860$51 8853 eves. gna, Notice is hereby giverythat there will be a Public Hearing on July 14,2Q09,at 7.30 p.m.in the Council Chambers of the Application #FY09-10-01, Owner/Applicant: Kennefli and � �x �"^ qN Sou . � ;;r A ' th Windsor Town Hall to consider the following: Cheryl Barnes fora variance for property located at 417 xx NOTICETOCREDITORS. 1. Appl.09-18P,Scoff Leonard,One Buckiand Rd-re Woodland Street to reduce the side yard to 2 feet,where 12 NOTICETOCREDROR$ .. ESTATE OF ESTA�OF quest for zone ch feet are required;reduce the.rear yard to.12 feet,where25 ange to Restricted Commercial for EUneR Clark(09.0244)- ICathkeitd �-0191 206+/-acres(4 properties)at 1,9,15 Buckland Road arefeet required Increase the coverage:to 2.3%,where a e Hon. O.James Purnell, ( ) and 395 Smith St,RR zone maximum of 20/o is permitted;and locate a driveway 3 feet The Hon. O. James Fumell,. f font the property line,where 10 feet-are required. Judge of the Court of Pro 2. 09-24P-South Windsor Stone&Landscaping,LLC- te,District of Ellington,by, III,Judge of the Court of Pro request for a Pro- bate,District of Ellington,b special_exception to article 4; Table cree dated June 29,2009, y 4.1.1A and site plan approval for a landscape material Interested persons may appear and be heard and/or written lered that all claims must decree dated June'19,2009, communications-will.be received. Copies of these applica-- ordered that all claims must' sales and storage/warehousing business property to presented to the fiduciary sated at 724 Strong Road,I zone lions areon file'in the Building Department of the Town of the address below.Failure be-presented to the fiduciary Windsor Locks. at the address below.Failure Copies of the applications are on file in the office of the promptly present any such Town Clerk and/or the Planning Department.At this hearing, to promptly suit i nt e l such Shane O'Connor Diane.Ferrari im may result in the loss of interested persons may appear-and be heard,and written claim may result in the loss ofChairman Recording Secretary its to recover on such comments by the public will be received. im. rights to recover. on such _ Zoning Board of Appeals claim. Thomas H.Smith, Patrick Kennedy,Chairman Joumal Inquirer Thomas H.Srk Journal Inquirer Assistant erk June 25,2009 Assistant Clerk a fiduciaries are: July 2,2009 July2,2009 nthia C.McClarran The fiduciary is: July 9,2009 PUBLIC N Monson Road James E.Sydoriak,c/oOTICE EPFlF1DPLANNINGANOTICE COMMISSION iffordSprings,CT06076 Susan Boyan,Esq. PtitficcNotice Boyan,Balskus& _ Pil*Nwn etin Foran,LLC g The Enfield Planning and Zoning Commission will hold Pub trey D.Clark 62 Hyde Avenue Electors and citizen fic Hearings on Thursday,July 9,2009,beginning at 7.30 Wapping Wood Road y s qualified to vote in town meetings are Vernon,CT 06066-4503 -hereby notified that a special town meetin of the Town of p`m.;in the Town HallCouncil Chambers,820:Enfield Street, ngton,CT 06029 g Enfield,CT,conceming the following: rmal Inquirer Journal Inquirer Stafford will be held in the Warren Memorial Town.:Hall,Vet- y 2 2009 July 2,2009 erans Meeting Room, Stafford Springs, Connecticut on PH#2681 Special Use Permit to allow.an Thursday July 9,2009 at 6:30 PM for the following purposes Open Space _ ^' Subdivision under Section 4.40.4 of the Zoning Regulations to wit _ , � "j o r on property located at and adjacent to 87 Simon Road, zoned R44,Map 69,tots 267,268 and296,Villages;LLC, PUBLIC NOTICE - `" ITEM 1. To consider and vote on a Resolution that the Town of Stafford Applicant and Owner. appropriate the$215;694;54 of grants-in- aublic sale of the contents of the storage spaces aid received from CL&P on the High School and Elementary ;pH#2682 -38 lot residential open construction p space subdivision on ed below will take place at Bradley Self Storage, projects to pay for additional,project property located at,and adjacent to 87 Simon Road;zoned 7 North Street, Windsor Locks, CT 06096, phone costs and that the appropriation be financed as part-of the R-44,Map 69;Lots 267,268 and 296,Villages-LLC, original bond authorization for the Appli- 0)623-5887 on Tuesday,July 7,2009 at 3:00 PM. projects. cant/Owner. ch space will be sold as one lot.The following goods I be sold: A'copy of the full text of.the Resolution is on file and avail pH#2684-Special Permit to unmerge lots of record to cre- able.for public inspection in the Town Clerk's Office. ate an additional building lot with the new lot to front at'23 ace NumberA3$,.ICrystal Ouellette:couch,lamp,,bed, New Street and the remaining lot to front at 42 Tariff Street rich television,furniture,air conditioner. ITEM2. To approve_an appropriation of$183,500 to the in a-Residential_33 District,Map 27,Lot 8 and Map 7,Lot ice Number B17, Dolores Dallam: clothes, bag, Capital Project;Stafford-Fre.Dept.acco_lint#9-20-790-7251 2g),Lucy Ruvolo,Appiicant/Owner. ces,luggage,house hold items. for Design Development,Construction Documents and bid- ace Number B19, Stephan Champagne: Furniture, ding phase costs of the New Stafford Fire Dept#1.Is,lamp,bed,baby items,fumiture,•house hold items, Applications are available for inspection at3he Planning Of- ITEM 3:To do an other�business fice'at Town Hall,820 Enfield Street. meho, boxes, bins, clothes, toys, outdoor furniture, Y proper to come before Dated this 26th Day of June,2009. isehold items.. said meeting. - ice Number C05, Stephan M. Champagne: Large PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION dows,table-saw,dog crate,inversion table,stove tops, Dated at Stafford,Connecticut,this 30th day of June 2009. c;air conditioners;vent,fertilizer spreader,large enter- rk�de�a r; SCANNED �4OW N a kl- m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 SOR•coN AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 MATTHEW B. GALLIGAN Town Manager July 10, 2009 Mr. Patrick Kennedy Chairman Planning &Zoning Commission 9 Tuttle Circle South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl. 09-18P, Scott Leonard, One Buckland Rd Dear Chairperson Kennedy: Please read the following into the record of the July 14, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing as my support for Application 09-18P, Scott Leonard, One Buckland Road: Please be advised that I am not able to attend this July 14, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting due to the fact that I am on vacation in Vermont. This vacation was scheduled over a year ago. I would like to inform the P&Z Commission that the project before you being presented by Scott Leonard, is a project that the Town Manager is endorsing. I would like to help Mr. Leonard provide a quality project on his site. The reason I am coming forward to support this project is that during the Evergreen Walk Hearings and Approvals, Evergreen Walk had to do some site lines and approvals for their entrance into their facility. As part of that, as you now, the Town Council did not do any condemnation on Mr. Leonard's site as he had worked with the developers of Evergreen Walk to give them some easements so that they would be able to move forward on the Evergreen Walk project. This created better site lines for the cars that are traveling along the Buckland Road Corridor. During that process, it was discussed that the Town would try to protect Mr. Leonard from being hurt by his voluntary decision to help us with our project and that he would still be able to have an entranceway on to Buckland Road for any project that he may do in the future. That is why I am supporting his application to`have Mr. Leonard be able to have access off of Buckland Road. I know that the Applicant has tried to work with the Simon Property to secure access from their property, but that has been denied. I do not want to see Mr. Leonard get hurt on this project. He stepped up to the plate to help us on a major project, which has proved to be a strong economic impact to the community. It has SCANNED provided a quality of life that South Windsor has been able to enjoy with its shopping and retail environment. I once again, support this application and apologize for not being here. If the public hearing remains open, I will be more than happy to come to the extended hearing to have discussions with the P&Z Commission as to what took place five years ago and how Mr. Leonard was very helpful and key in our Evergreen Walk project. Mr. Scott Leonard has also done other work in South Windsor and has been a pleasure to deal with. He has followed all of the rules and regulations that our department heads, from Building Inspector to Director of Planning, and has always been accommodating to make sure that he follows the approvals as outlined by the P&Z Commission and Staff. I want to thank the Chairman and the Commission Members for taking the time to review this letter. I stand ready to discuss this further if the Public Hearing is continued. If not, I hope we see our way clear in approving this application. Very truly yours, Matthew B. Galligan Town Manager cc: Peter DeMallie Peter Alter o 9 4�NosOR.`o��4 Chevy Crew Diesel 99'- C2500LS, 4X2,Tow Pkg, cap,- Now tires, orig owner, mint O cond,$7995 bo 413-569-0334 Nonmm,_CREOFORS NOTICE TOCREDITORS DODGE DAKOTA'95, 2 wd,5 'ESTATEOF ESTATE OF Spd manual, single cab. Only V.Arilxxrdeiws0902fXi J 94K mi,4 cyl,bed cover.Great ( ) Startislaus Ley( ) work truck $2295. Call 860- The Hon.Marianne Lassman The Hon.J.Christopher Kefx 623-1800 Fisher,Judge of the Court of vick, Judge of the Court of FORD F-100:1982-3.8 v6,Iow Probate, District of East Probate, District of Windsor C "tiles ruts very well.Classified L Ant.$2,799.871-1535 Windsor, by decree dated Locks,by decree dated July r, FORD F-350'95.PICKUP,4X4, July 2,2009,ordered that all 6, 2009, ordered that all Dump Bed Meyers snowplow, claims must be presented to claims must be presented to 159K mi. Good coed work the fiduciary at the address the fiduciary at the address truck, dark blue. $4900/60. below. Failure_to promptly below. Failure to promptly 860-533-1572,860.209-2079 Ford Pick up 98 .#T47G8 Present any such claim may present any such claim may r $3,995.Call Ray Seraphim Ford result in the loss of rights to result in the loss of rights to N 871-2101. 20WA recover on such claim. recover on such claim. FORD RANGER 4X4 FX OFF - Annette T.Tarascio, Laurie Roberts, RD.2004,68K air,auto,am/fm, Clerk Clerk 6 CD, liner,keyless entry, ex- The Go-fiduciaries are: The fiduciary is: ` 6c4 lent c nditkxL $13,500. Call Paul A.Judenis Anthony J.Ladny,clo 5 123 Ridgewood Road Thomas W.Fahey,Jr.;Esq. K GMC 28K,Sonoma 9J truck! 3,at,50. Wallingford,CT 06492 Fah !!!� a/o: 128K Nice trucld $3,950. n9f Fahey&Landdina, ' The Car Place at 860-763-3273 & Attorneys LLC N Kathryn M.J.Brochu 487 Spring Street 179 Charles Street Windsor Locks,CT 06096 h Tolland;CT 06084 Journal Inquirer what Journal-Inquirer July 9,2009 VVV July 9,2009 J are you ; , PUeuCNOTTCE SODUTH.WNDSOR PLANNING&ZOW ODWASSION t Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing on looking July 14,2009,at T30 p.m.in the Council Chambers of the A South Windsor Town Hall to consider the following: _ 1.Appl.09-18P,Scott Leonard,One Buckland Rd—re- for quest for zone change to Restricted Commercial for 2.06+/-acres(4 properties)at 1,9,15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith St,RR zone 2. 09-24P-South.Windsor Stone&Landscaping,LLC- Find it requestfor a special exception to article 4, Table J 4.1.1A and site plan approval for landscape material o�rna� s sales and storagetwarehousing business property lo- k cated at 724 Strong Road,I zone '� Copies of the applications are on file in the office of the ■ interested In ��'��� Town Clerk and/or the Planning Department.At this hearing, T r, persons may appear and be heard,and written g Massif ied. comments by the public will be received. gCLASSIFIED Patrick Kennedy,Chairman Journal Inquirer July 2,2009 Journal 6464767 ��lye,zooe PUBLIC NOTICE OBID Inquirer 623.2611 ERPUB CSC MANCIESiER PUBLICSCH00LS TOWN OF MANCHESTER,CONNECTICUT ti #10-001p[ n r The Manchester Board of Education will receive bids.in the PUBLIC NOTICE Office of the Assistant to the Superintendent,Finance and OFFICE OF TAX COLLECTOR Management, 45 North School Street,Manchester, Con- necticut 06042 on the date and time listed below for the The first half of real estate and motor vehicle taxes($250.00 following: I, &over),as well as your total personal property tax on the N grand list of 2008 are due and payable to the Town of So- FOOD SERVICE LINE mers on July 1,2009.Taxes not paid by Monday,Aug.3, WASHINGTON SCHOOL CAFETERIA ul 2009 will be considered delinquent and interest will be charged at the rate of 1.5%per month(18% per year)on Bids will be opened on: THURSDAY,JULY 27,2009 at the tax due from the due date of July 1,2009.There is a 10,00 a.m.in the Office of the Assistant to the Superinten- minimum charge of$2.00. dent,Finance and Management at 45 North School Street, ` Manchester,CT 06042. No other bills will be sent out for either the real estate or motor vehicle second half taxes,which are due in January A mandatory site visit is scheduled for MONDAY,JULY 2010.To avoid standing in line,please mail your payments 20th at 10:00 a.m.at Washington Elementary School, to the Tax Collector,Town of Somers, P.O. Box-235, So- 94 Cedar Street,Manchester,CT.06040 r mers,CT 06071.You are still welcome to come into the of- fice,and we will be happy to give you your total over the The awarding authority reserves the right to waive any in- phone at either 860-763-8210 or 860-763-8209. formation in bidding,to reject any and all bids or any part n thereof,and to accept any bid if it be in the public interest to 5. do so. I- Please note:We now accept Debit Card payments as well as all major Credit Card payments on line at: q www.somersct.aov. A 50 cent convenience fee will be No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of ninety(90)_ r charged if you pay with a Debit card.You will be charged a days after the date of bid opening. 94 04 rZe ° �< 503H WI VOW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (QM6 WENSON, EC0N0MIC DEVELOPMENT (00 0401OQ IbSOR-Ck)" CA July 14, 2009 1VhFD Mr. Patrick Kennedy, Chair Members and Alternates Planning & Zoning Commission RE: Appl. 09-18P, Scott Leonard, One Buckland Rd—request for zone change to Restricted Commercial for 2.06+/- acres (4 properties) at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith St, RR zone Dear Chairman Kennedy, Members and Alternates: On behalf of the Economic Development Commission and myself as economic developer, I convey the strongest support for the above application. The applicant has made a presentation to the Economic Development Commission and the Commission has unanimously voted to endorse this application. The property in question abuts this zone currently and is situated among commercial development. Its frontage on Buckland Road, despite its challenging nature, would seem to lend itself to commercial development. Further, this property owner has cooperated and contributed to the development of the area on a holistic level. They have cooperated with the Towns of South Windsor and Manchester as well as the developer of Evergreen Walk. Such actions demonstrate a commitment to quality and community goals. The opportunity to achieve goals identified in the Town's Plan of Conservation and Development for this area of town is significant. Changing the zoning of this property will allow for its highest and best use. Significant real property improvements and the potential for increased economic activity would also benefit the Town. Again, we strongly urge your approval of this application to facilitate the successful attention of the land use goals established for this area. Sincerely, Craig Stevenson Economic Developer FPeter Jay .ter, LLC RECEIVED ATTORNEY AT LAW 'JUL SCANNED Peter Jay Alter palterClpiallc.com SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, Poi lI Avenue P.O.Booxx 1530 Glastonbury,CT Gail S.Shaulys o6033 OF COUNSEL gsliaL[Ivs@plallc.com 86o.652.402,0 telephone July 16, 2009 86o.6S2.4022 facsimile Mr. and Mrs. Richard Gancarz 383 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Re: Buckland Road Development Property of Scott Leonard Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gancarz: As you may be aware from the Public Hearing on July 14, 2009 held in the South Windsor Town Hall with respect to Mr. Leonard's property on Buckland Road, I represent Mr. Leonard. You indicated in your remarks to the Commission that you are represented by counsel and I would request that you refer this letter to your attorney so that I may communicate with your lawyer. As you are represented by counsel, but did not identify him/her by name, I was unable to send this correspondence directly to your attorney. The intent of this letter is to offer to meet informally and privately with you and your attorney to discuss ways that Mr. Leonard can proceed with the development of his property for commercial purposes that would reduce the impacts on your property, that would give you the assurances you seek that what is approved will be completed and that your concerns will be considered early in the planning process. I certainly recognize that you have no obligation to meet with us, nor is there any assurance that we can find a common solution to your concerns. I do want to express that Mr. Leonard has a willingness to attempt to find a plan that addresses as many concerns of yours as possible. It is my experience that such efforts are far more successful when undertaken early in the planning process and outside of the context of a formal public hearing. An unfettered, off-the-record conversation is more likely to find some areas of agreement and accommodation than is the formalized debate style of indirect communication that a public hearing requires. If you do not want to involve your attorney but still wish to meet, we are willing to do so but I would urge you to consult with your counsel in determining if and how you would like to proceed. I look forward to a positive response from you or your attorney. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Yours truly, eter Ja Alter, Attorney for Scott Leonard Cc: Ms. Marcia Banach, Director of Community Development; Scott Leonard; Peter DeMallie �o"'" SFa� South Vind5or Economic Development Craig Stevenson. Economic Development Coordinator V o c c., a OR.CO SCANNED July 14, 2009 Mr. Patrick Kennedy, Chair Members and Alternates Planning & Zoning Commission RE: Appl.09-18P, Scott Leonard, One Buckland Rd—request for zone change to Restricted Commercial for 2.06+/- acres (4 properties) at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith St, RR zone Dear Chairman Kennedy, Members and Alternates: On behalf of the Economic Development Commission and myself as economic developer, I convey the strongest support for the above application. The applicant has made a presentation to the Economic Development Commission and the Commission has unanimously voted to endorse this application. The property in question abuts this zone currently and is situated among commercial development. Its frontage on Buckland Road, despite its challenging nature, would seem to lend itself to commercial development. Further, this property owner has cooperated and contributed to the development of the area on a holistic level. They have cooperated with the Towns of South Windsor and Manchester as well as the developer of Evergreen Walk. Such actions demonstrate a commitment to quality and community goals. The opportunity to achieve goals identified in the Town's Plan of Conservation and Development for this area of town is significant. Changing the zoning of this property will allow for its highest and best use. Significant real property improvements and the potential for increased economic activity would also benefit the Town. Again, we strongly urge your approval of this application to facilitate the successful attention of the land use goals established for this area. Sincerely, Craig Stevenson Janis Murtha Economic Developer Economic Development Commission Chairperson Appl #09-18P, Leonard Zone Change RR to RC Public Hearing 7-14-09 Planning Department Report sus Vic eA�a-c L-- btu �t s // '"r gu � 01,411,7�t (�oc�c 1. Zone change request from Rural Residential to Restricted C=mm"ercial for 4 properties totaling 2 acres located at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith Street. aze re :peiYy s" . Minimum lot size required in the RC zone is 30,000 sq ft; minimum frontage required is 150 feet. 2. There is some zone change application history on this site. In October 2000, a zone change request to Buckland Gateway zone for this property was denied by the Commission. The reasons for denial were: a. Commercial development with access directly onto Buckland Road in this vicinity would create a safety hazard; and b. There was concern that commercial development would propose access onto Smith Street, which is residential in nature. The minutes of that meeting reflect Commission discussion that this area is probably no longer desirable nor appropriate as residential property due to the extensive amount of surrounding commercial property, but that access needs to be addressed. It was also noted that if the access issue is addressed, the Commission would be receptive to a reapplication. In 2003, another application for a zone change to Buckland Gateway zone was submitted, but the application was withdrawn prior to the public hearing. ion development depicts-this area as Economic 3. Th�e�wn Plan onservat !velop m Tes that the moo. appropriate use_ afe and will J r contin to be�co� d industria es that are ink ormance wit =the Gui ng Prin es and Objectives the Plan. T d' site is surro ded by Bu 'kland G eway zone on the rth and east; a anchester com :ercial zone on the south Designed Comm rcial and Rural Re idential zones on'the west. 4. Section 8.3 provides criteria for the Commission to consider for all zone change applications. The criteria include but are not limited to: a. The goals, objectives, and recommendations of the Plan of Conservation and Development; b. The purposes of zoning and of these regulations; i r n conform to the access management requirements. The Commission's access management planning on Buckland Road included the provision of traffic lights spaced to eventually serve all Buckland Road driveways. This property does not have existing or future access to any of those traffic lights—but it does hwmmthe 4L v 4- the Plaza at Buckland Hills existing driveway. If this zone change is approved, Planning Dept requests the standard access management interconnection easement to the south to allow for a future interconnection with the Plaza at Buckland Hills, in accordance ith the provisions of Section 5.5 of the zoning regulations. Site design'Jao need to demonstrate that the interconnection is physically feasible, and the easement document will need to be filed on the land records. The standard easement requires that when the access is available on the adjoining property, the subject property must complete the interconnection and remove the stand-alone driveway. The Commission has consistently required the same treatment on Buckland Road properties since the access management regulations wer adopted. /I Ins �.- s, �va�-�� rfeeQ o% 1/ s-an_r �d:I.,_ w K,i - "_ a, s� a-1� A �� 1/h L,t 4- -/QV, n A,. 6 ,t d ,c�w 7. This property has the challenge of a steep grade from the road to the back of the property, with about a 30-foot difference in grade over a length of about 270 feet. The options for development include: filling up to Buckland Road level; terracing; or splitting the difference and filling to the midpoint of the grade. Filling up to Buckland Road would result in3a^high retaining wall along the back and Smith St side property boundaries. The abutting neighbor at 383 Smith Street will be most impacted by filling and retaining walls as there is not much space between the existing house and the Leonard property boundary. Terracing up to Buckland Road would make development difficult because the property is small. Staff recommend that the grade be split, thus reducing the retaining wall impact on the house at 383 Smith St and facilitating access to the adjoining Plaza at Buckland Hills driveway. 8. The Town Sanitarian has indicated a concern with drainage from this site potentially affecting existing septic systems. Detention will be needed for stormwater runoff. There is existing stormwater drainage in Smith Street but it is probably not adequate to incorporate drainage from the Leonard property. 9. There would be a buffer requirement on the east property boundary. The Restricted Commercial zone buffer requirement is 50 feet. The applicant has indicated this intention of seeking variances to setback and buffer requirements. +v IO.Public water is available in Smith Street. P in t - sera€ ;one�'o�i-B ergreen Walk pro rty-and-:�_ Paaat; u�klr �l- ksropxty. Connecting to either of theme sewers will 3 cap) - SCANNED V G � J 7.0-U'An O-P Satim �G � m � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�OSox-co�� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 00014578 5379 July 20, 2009 Design Professionals Inc. Peter DeMallie 425 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Appl. 09-18P, Leonard Zone Change We are pleased to advise you that at its July 14, 2009 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve your request for a zone change from Rural Residential zone to Restricted Commercial zone for properties located at 1, 9, 15 Buckland Road and 395 Smith Street. Within ninety days, by October 16, 2009 a zone change map (1" = 40') with an A-2 certification must be filed, showing all boundary lines and the acreage of the land where the zone change was granted. The map shall be drawn in accordance with the rules and regulations of the State Board of Registration for Professionals Engineers and Land Surveyors and shall be stamped and signed by a Registered Land Surveyor. The zone change map must be submitted on black and white mylars, with this approval letter thereon, together with three blueprint copies of the Zone Change. After the mylars have been stamped and signed by the Commission,they will be returned to you for filing in the Town Clerk's office. The effective date of the Zone Change is the date the mylar is filed in the Town Clerk's office. Sincerely, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman - Planning&Zoning Commission PK/ma