The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVariance for building addition 5960 BUILDING APPLICATION Application No. ........6.23............. „ .___..___._......_...._ onthe ...........Guth.............................................. tide of Wind sory ille Rd. .... ..................................._.................... ........_......._............. Street. Street No, ..........:.7. . .... ......... ..... Owner tidilliam Raulukaitis ... .............................. Applicant ..... Same.................... ... .............. ............... CLASSIFICATION Addition to store 12lx26'8" . . ...... .. .... .... ................. .................. App.e.al .gr..arit ed. .41n Em6.7.:,._._.... ..... . ...................... ...... ........ ... ......... ... ...... .......__............... Permit issued on above Applicati 5 5 67 Dace, .. ...........-. .. ........... 19... .. 055 tQ this appeal on two grounds. If the variance: is the antenna erected, there will be a change in the residential character of the neighborhood, and there : inution of the value of )neighboring property because assFtrial connotation Mr. Donnelly said there was no sewn here with respect to this particular piece of Orr represented the persons living next doer and ;street Donald Sherman and Edward Geddes. He said there issomething particular about the applicantts could give him some special need to have this towers ' than the board a power to grant this variance. 'When � . of the property in the area would be affected, this taken: into consideration. r. Orr said this tower would teful and harmful to practically all of the people in the to grant this variance would not be in the public Also, it is not an accessory permitted use as defined ch ng Regulations. xir# Orr cited several. castes whl sett the power of the Hoard to grant variance shouldd be exercised and only where undue hardship would result. done said that the maximum widthof the masts at the top wer would be 32 feet. The tower would be bolted to a base so that it would not be a permanent installation* A Tres would come approximately 10 to 12 feet frame, the arty line. He pointed out that under the south Windsor Code, antennae for private radio and television reception txan 12 feet in height can be erected on the roof of any without a building permit. The proposed tower is 68 feat dhermsn, l Minton give, d that the antenna state directly beside his house and the guy wires would camas i '=� feet -of his property line. It will be clearly visible house and he considered it very objectionable. ` _d Geddes 23 Broadleaf Drive, said that the tower would j .tly vislb a from his back yard across the street. p 9ple from the neighborhood where this variance was 'A. stood to register their opposition to this appeal- ON William Raulukaitis, 5557 Roads ' dssor requests a variance to allow construction �clQser is t line than pemitted on premises known. as 5557 i.ndsor- 5=sad. i' zone I' ukaitis stated he was requesting a variance in order to j ct a 12t x 28t addition to this building which houses etail outlets: a package store, grocery stare and a take- � . Ner shop. `the proposed addition on would come within seven the front line. Rro haulukai.ti.s said the business has Y ere for over forty years. He presented a petition sigd ohs stating they would appreciate larger facilities-, There is presently perking in Front of the stares and arrangemen` have been made for use of the land across the street for pa.rki.ng' as well* There is also .some parking available next to the build, Piro Cari no, Ellington Road, questioned whether the parking area across the street, which is under another ownership, would fulfil the parking requirements of the Zoning Regulations* APPLICATION 226 Alfred rancis and David Paine 658 Ellingto oid, bouth Windsor, request a variance to allow live entert:ai in an RC zone on premises known as 658 Ellington Roads RC: z4r Attys Frank Ahearn said that 14ro Francis had requested that this application be withdrawn without prejudice. APPLICATION, .5 - Robert Murrill, 82 Felt Road, appi.ng, recces. A variance to allow operation of a dry-cleaning outlet on premix known as 283 Oakland Road, 'vlappi.ng. RC zone: Mr. Burr-ill stated he was requesting; a variance to allow a. dry- cleaning store in the Wapping Shopping Center, in one of thestores in the new section being erected* He said that the fluid used are non-flarimable. he felt this use would be in the catege.. of a, personal service shop, except that they intended to i:nstal.l . maehinery to do the cleaning on the premises. Nirt Leslie Chapman 46 Brian Road, who will operate the shop, said the equipment they propose to install would consist of m 5 24 cubic foot cleaning machine, a recl.aimer machine for the solvents, a filter and a steam-pressing machine. APPLICATION �29$ - Charles Pelletier, 2783 Ellington Road, 4'appi requests a variance to allow parking of a camp trailer on premix known as V3 MlAvoWh Road. A-20 zone, Mr , Pelletier said he was requesting a variance to park his tray trailer on his premises. He stated this 16 foot aluminum trailer is for the use of his family for recreation purposes only. He said the property is sufficiently large so that the trailer woul" not generally be visible from the str€et# Mr. Pelletier said he would be willing to erect fencing or plant'. shrubs to screen the trailer if the Board felt this was necessary He said his neighbors dial not object to the trailer. APPLICATION 122 - dray & Lorry's Ci.tgo, 856 Sullivan Avenue, . Sou Windsor request a. State Hearing for a general repairer's licens on pgreases known as 856 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor. 11C zo (State Hearing) r. Raymond Libbey stated he was applying for a general repairer license in order to offer complete service to his customers si.nc , under the present limited repairer's license he cannot perform After the public Hearing, before the. Board went into executive sess3.on, Y'. McLaughlin met with the hoard briefly to explain that accGrding to the Building Cade, his approval is necessary for a tower more than 12 feet in height. However, he felt the use of the tower for trans ii.ssion as well as reception. was not within the regulations, and that it was the use of the tower rather than the tower itself which the board had to consider. .r. reeves questioned whether the Hoard could consider this apt again since there had been no change from the previous applicat Mr. Mavens said that the Town shttarney felt it ' would be best if the Board heard ttijs as a necv appeal. Mr. Sievers commented on the provision made in the Building Cod l. so that antennae will not fall onto neighboring property, Mr. Provost said the hoard would not be depriving the a.ppliaant of his hobby by denying the appeal; he could still. transmit end receive ithout t 1lis tower, he felt. that the neighboring property owners have rights, too- He also pointed out that the .f applicant dial not want to use his awn back yard for the �.ow€ar• 14r# Sievers said he would riot be in favor of allowing the tower , in the location. Mr. Ya.covone has picked. He did not think that the hoard had the right to allow any deviation fron the Hu l.din Code. Itifr. Reeves said there was no hardship in this instance that wou allow the hoard to approver a transmission antenna. F +fir# Reeves moved that Appeal #594 be denied as the applicant failed to show undue hardship. Mr* Boucher seconded the motion , Al.l in favor, Done opposed* it was a unanimous vote and so ordered. Eit`F '44TIVE I3ATIE: April 14, 1967 A2'221122ti2a #525 - Vai l Yr. Reeves felt the hoard should not grant the appeal without a stipulation that parking facilities be provided# this was an opportunity to correct an unsafe situation. Txr. Boucher suggested that parking be prohibited in the _Front of the building, Llr. fieeves moved thee, this request for a variant ee for constructi of a building closer to the front- l.i.ne than permitted, described . in the appeal as being seven feet, be granted subject to the provision that parking be prohibited and prevented in front of the retail. outlets. Mr. Sievers seconded the motion*