The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-28P Nutmeg Village Spe Excep Site Plan Resub TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING& ZONING COMMISSION j APPLICATION FORM RECEIVED Application No: / cz— Official Receipt Date: ZZ MAY 21 2012 ' Receipt No f' Z 0 d(p �j Jr ' SOUTH WIND60R PLANNING DEPT.< APPLICANT: Horseshoe Lane Associates,L.L.C.; C/O Robert Urso PROJECT NAME: Nutmeg Village ADDRESS: See attached OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: See attached ADDRESS: See attached COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: See attached See'S fASSESSOR MAP # attached RCEL# see attached ZONE See attached NAME, ADDRESS,TEL& FAX #OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie Design Professionals,Inc 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 (860)291-8755-phone (860)291-8757-fax Estimated presentation time: 60 min. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ® Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval Special Exception to Article 3.4 (Public Hearing, Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development- State Hearing per Section 14-55 for ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision -Attach proposed amendment(Public Hearing Required) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for(Public Hearing Required) ❑ In Law apartment/Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation for(Public Hearing Required) ❑ Other(explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. G� See attached Signature of Applie t Signature of Property Owner Nutmeg Village Planning&Zoning Application Form Attachment—Resubdivision/Site Plan/Special Exception PARCEL 1 Property Address: 100 South Satellite Road;formerly R003 Nutaneg Road Owner Name: M.G.Realty Limited Partnership Owner Mailing Address: 61 S.Main Street,West Hartford,CT 06107 Complete Location of Property: South of South Satellite Road/GIS#6510R003 Assessor's Ma #: 146 Parcel#: I R003 I Zone: I I/MF-AA 0-t Q S ature of Parcel 1 6wner PARCEL 2 Property Address: L023 Pleasant Valley Road Owner Name: J.E.Shepard Co. Owner Mailing Address: P.O.Box 415,East Windsor Hill,CT 06028 Complete Location of Property: North of Pleasant Valley Road/GIS#7290L023 Assessor's Ma #: 133 Parcel#: 19 Zone: I MF-AA - Signal5re of Parcel 2 Owner PARCEL 3 Property Address: 388 Pleasant Valley Road Owner Name: Eric A.&Kristin R.Eggleston Owner Mailing Address: 388 Pleasant Valley Road,South Windsor,CT 06074 Complete Location of Property: North of Pleasant Valley Road/GIS#72900388 Assessor's Map#: 133 Parcel#: 1 18 Zone: I/MF-AA 4AA�7V S2�,�5—/j I j/Z� .. A �p,Yn.-1 U- bi liz Signature of arcel 3 Owner PARCEL 4 Property Address: 428 Pleasant Valley Road Owner Name: Rohan M.&Michelle D.Taylor Owner Mailing Address: 428 Pleasant Valley Road,South Windsor,CT 06074 Complete Location of Property: North of Pleasant Valley Road/GIS#72900428 Assessor's Ma #: 34 Parcel#:T 1-3 Zone: I A-20/MF-AA Signature of Parcel 4 Efcaner t al 1 RETURN DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 ) SUPERIOR COURT 2 JEREMY E. BAVER ) J.D. OF HARTFORD 3 V. )AT HARTFORD 4 INLAND WETLANDS ) 5 AGENCY/CONSERVATION ) August 6, 2012 COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OFco ) 6 SOUTH WINDSOR 0 ) z APPEAL FROM DECISION OF THE INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY Mcn 8 N °° 9 CITATION a � J O Z Ln 10 TO ANY PROPER OFFICER, GREETINGS: wo a o , you are hereby 11 BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT D - wu a V La o 12 commanded to summon the INLAND WETLANDS AGENCYICONSERVATION � 0 13 COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, in the County of Hartford, 14 w 15 Connecticut, South Windsor Town Hall,1540 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, C 2 16 06074, and THE COMMISSIONER OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL 3 M 17 PROTECTION to appear before the Superior Court for the Judicial District o 18 19 Hartford to be held at Hartford on September 4, 2012, and said appearance to b 20 made by the Inland Wetland Agency/Conservation Commission of the Town o 21 South Windsor, and the Commissioner-of Energy & Environmental Protection, o -A . 22 each of its respective attorneys by entering a written statement of appearance 23 with the Clerk of said Court on or before the second day following the return day, 24 and then and there to answer unto the following complaint and appeal of Jeremy 25 i 1 E. Baver of 36 Whitney Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06105, by leaving with or a 2 the usual place of abode of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor, two 3 true and attested copies of the complaint and appeal and of this citation and 4 summons, and in the hands of or by certified mail return receipt requested mailed 5 a 6 postage prepaid to the Attorney General of Connecticut, at least twelve day CO z before the return day, in the manner provided by law for the service of civil 8 process. N 00 s s 9 I hereby certify that the Plaintiff has the financial responsibility sufficient to pay the w 10 Ln costs of this action and is recognized in the sum of five hundred dollars t a o 11 12 prosecute this appeal to full effect and comply with all orders and decrees of the Z W Z w " 13 Court. � o ; o z 14 Hereof fail not but of this writ with your doings thereon, make due service and N 15 return. 16 Dated at Hartford, Connecticut this 6th day of August, 2012. ID M 17 19 By: .ere E aver, Esq. 20 mmi i r of the Superior Court 21 22 23 24 25 2 `� � � 1 RETURN DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 ) SUPERIOR COURT 2 JEREMY E. BAVER ) J.D. OF HARTFORD 3 V. )AT HARTFORD 4 ) INLAND WETLANDS 5 AGENCY/CONSERVATION August 6, 2012 COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF00 rq ) 0 6 SOUTH WINDSOR ) COMPLAINT AND APPEAL 8 FROM THE INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE co 9 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR LD CO � s 10 3 � 11 1. The plaintiff, JEREMY E. BAVER (hereinafter, "Plaintiff') is an individual who has sUU K U 12 a future interest in real property known as 389 Pleasant Valley Road, South Z 13 Windsor, Connecticut, and currently resides at 36 Whitney Street, Hartford, 0 14 Connecticut. 15 W 2. The defendant, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/CONSERVATION 16 ID� 17 COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR (hereinafter, "IWACC") is 18 the agency designated and having jurisdiction in the Town of South Windsor to 19 hear and consider all applications relating to activities affecting "inland wetlands' 20 and "watercourses" within the town of South Windsor pursuant to Connecticut 21 22 General Statutes ("CGS") §§ 22a-36 through 22a-45 and The Inland 23 WetlandA41atercourse and Conservation Regulations of the Town of South 24 Windsor. 25 1 1 3. Daniel C. Esty is the Commissioner of Connecticut's Department of Energy and 2 Environmental Protection, with an office located at 79 Elm Street, Hartford, 3 Connecticut 06106 and is being served with the complaint and appeal pursuant 4 to CGS § 22a-43(a). Pursuant to CGS §22a-43(a), Commissioner Esty has the 5 0 6 right to appear as a party of interest in this case. 00 0 4. M.G. Realty Limited Partnership (hereinafter, "MGR") is a Connecticut Limited 0) 8 Partnership with an address listed as c/o Arnold Greenberg, 61 South Main N co s 9 Street, West Hartford, Connecticut 06107. J 00 °° 10 00 5. Upon information and belief, MGR owns the majority of property that this Appeal " � 11 g w concerns. > wZ 12 m Z 0 13 6. This Appeal also concerns two smaller properties. 0 14 7. Vacant property known as L023 Pleasant Valley Road (33-19) is owned by J.E. 15 Shepard Company, 200 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, Connecticut. 16 3: 8. Residential property known as 388 Pleasant Valley Road is owned by Eric A. & Lo m 17 18 Kristen R. Eggleston. 19 9• Upon information and belief, MGR holds options to purchase the property owned 20 by J.E. Shepard Company and Eric A. & Kristen R. Eggleston. 21 10.On, or about, 5/15/2012, MGR, through its agent Horseshoe Lane Associates, 22 23 LLC c/o Robert Urso (hereinafter, the "Applicant"), submitted its application, #12- 24 28P (the "Application") to the IWACC to conduct regulated activity in a regulated 25 wetland area. 2 1 11.The Application calls for the construction of a 155 multi-family development, with 2 associated roadways, parking, utilities, and landscaping, and the creation of six 3 industrial lots (the "Proposed Development"). 4 12.The land area of the project is 61.811 acres, approximately 18.9% of which is 5 wetlands. 00 N 6 z 13.The Application called for approximately 6.40 acres of regulated area 8 disturbance. N CO 1 9 14.The Application called for approximately 1,900 square feet of direct wetland and U 0 ID CO a 10 0 0 watercourse alteration. " 0 11 � U 15.The Application called for approximately 13,000 square feet of potential indirect w C a 12 CO z z 0 13 wetland and watercourse alteration. 0 14 16.The Application called for approximately 195 lineal feet of proposed stream N 15 alteration. 16 3 17.The Proposed Development will require the construction of a bridge to cross the ID M 17 18 watercourse located in the southern section of the development. 19 18.Upon information and belief, and as indicated in the site plan maps, the 20 Proposed Development plans to build a dam in the watercourse located in the 21 southern section of the development. 22 23 19.The Applicant was required to identify all other permits or approvals that had 24 been issued, applied for, or required with respect to the proposed activity set 25 forth in the Application. 3 1 20.Upon information and belief, the Applicant did not state all the permits or 2 approvals that were required in the Application. 3 21.As the Application proposed to have a significant impact on wetlands and 4 watercourses, the IWACC held a public hearing g pursuant to §10.1 of The Inland 5 WetlandlWatercourse and Conservation Regulations of the Town of South °° 6 N Windsor on 6/20/2012. The public hearing was continued to a special meeting 8 on 7/11/2012, and again continued until its regular meeting on 7/18/2012. The N 00 11 9 public hearing was closed on 7/18/2012. J s CO CO 10 22.Pursuant to CGS §22a-19, the IWACC granted the Plaintiff intervener status and � � 11 the Plaintiff was considered a party to the application. > Q Zw 12 mZ 0 13 23.Testimony and documentary evidence showing adverse impacts was offered at 14 the public hearing in opposition to the Application. Ln 15 24.Testimony and documentary evidence was offered at the public hearing that w 16 showed that the proposed alterations in the Application involved conduct likely to m 17 18 unreasonably pollute, impair, or destroy the public trust in the air, water, or other 19 natural resource of the state. 20 25.Testimony and documentary evidence was offered at the public hearing that 21 showed that there are feasible and prudent alternatives consistent with the 22 23 reasonable requirements of the public health, safety, and welfare. 24 25 4 1 26.The Applicant's own expert testimony indicated that numerous activities were 2 proposed that disturbed inland wetlands and/or were within the 80 foot upland 3 review zones of the inland wetlands. 4 27.The Applicant's own expert testimony indicated that numerous activities were 5 6 proposed that directly adversely impacted the watercourse located in the 00 Z southern portion of the property. The Applicant's own testimony indicated that 8 numerous activities were proposed that were within the 80 foot upland review N W 9 zone. J s W a' - 10 0 28.The Applicant's own expert testimony indicated that numerous activities were " `° 11 3 � s ~ j 12 proposed that would cause adverse impact likely causing existing inland a Zv m Z U 13 wetlands to cease to function as wetlands and cease to exist. 0 0 14 29.The Plaintiff offered evidence that was not refuted that identified feasible and Ln 15 prudent alternatives were not addressed by Applicant in violation of§ 9.3 of the 16 3 Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations of the Town of South m 17 18 Windsor. 19 30.The Town of South Windsor's Senior Environmental Planner, Jeffrey H. Folger, 20 stated in his 6/8/2012 letter to the Applicant, "Please be prepared to demonstrate 21 feasible and prudent alternatives to the proposed project, including reducing the 22 23 number of dwelling units." 24 31.The Applicant failed to provide substantial evidence to show that certain feasible 25 and prudent alternatives did not exist to the proposed Application. 5 1 32.The Applicant failed to provide any evidence to show that certain feasible and 2 prudent alternatives did not exist to the proposed Application. 3 33. The Applicant's own expert testimony admitted that certain feasible and prudent 4 alternatives to the proposed application did exist (such as reducing the number o 5 Ch dwelling units or reducing the amount of impervious surface areas) that would °° 6 41 Z lessen the adverse impacts to the inland wetlands. 8 34.At the 7/18/2012 meeting, the IWACC deliberated and voted to approve the N 00 9 Application. J s ID CO a 10 DLn 35.The IWACC published notice of the approval of the Application in the Journal " � 11 Inquirer newspaper on 7/24/2012. Z aG 12 m a 13 36.The IWACC also sits as the Town of South Windsor's Conservation Commission. 0 14 37.The IWACC failed to apply the directives as found in the Town of South 15 Windsor's Plan of Conservation and Development and the Open Space Master 16 Plan in considering the Application. M 17 18 38.The IWACC failed to act, and/or neglected its duty, in its capacity as the 19 Conservation Commission in considering the Application. 20 39.In approving the Application the IWACC exceeded its statutory authority and 21 acted illegally, arbitrarily, and in an abuse of the discretion vested in it in that: 22 a. There is not substantial evidence in the record to support the IWACC's 23 24 decision that the inland wetlands, watercourses, and conservation permit 25 complies with the requirements of the Connecticut General Statutes and 6 i 1 the Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations of the 2 Town of South Windsor. 3 b. Based on credible evidence in the record, the regulated activities 4 proposed in the Application are likely to adversely impact inland wetlands 5 and watercourses. CO 6 z 7 c. Numerous feasible and prudent alternatives exist that would reduce or g eliminate the impacts to inland wetlands and watercourses caused by the N 00 9 regulated activities as proposed by Application. U O 00 J lD a . 10 d. The IWACC failed to satisfy the mandates of CGS §22a-41 et seq. 3 � 11 U 12 e. §11.2(B) of the Inland WetlandlWatercourse and Conservation a Z w 0 Regulations of the Town of South Windsor require the IWACC to consider 13 0 14 "The applicant's purpose for, and any feasible and prudent alternatives to, 15 the proposed regulated activity which alternatives would cause less or no Ln 16 environmental impact to wetlands or watercourses." rn 17 18 f. § 9.3 of the Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations of 19 the Town of South Windsor require that: "The applicant shall present any 20 alternatives considered and indicate why the proposal to alter wetlands se 21 forth was chosen. In addition, the applicant shall clearly prove that the 22 proposed alteration or destruction of wetlands and/or watercourses is 23 24 unavoidable and that a feasible and prudent alternative to the alteration or 25 destruction of wetlands and/or watercourses does not exist." 7 1 g. § 11.3 of the Inland WetlandlWatercourse and Conservation Regulations 2 of the Town of South Windsor require that: "In the case of an application 3 which received a public hearing pursuant to a finding by the Agency that 4 the proposed activity may have a significant impact on wetlands or 5 watercourses, a permit shall not be issued unless the Agency finds on the CO 6 z basis of the record that a feasible and prudent alternative does not exist. 8 In making this finding the Agency shall consider the facts and N 00 9 circumstances set forth in subsection 11.2 of this section. The finding and v � 00 10 0 o the reasons therefor shall be stated on the record in writing.„ " � 11 u h. The IWACC failed to make the required finding and statement. aZ 12 mZ 13 i. The IWACC failed to consider evidence submitted during the public 0 14 hearing for the Application. 15 j. The IWACC failed to consider and apply the appropriate standards of Z 16 administrative review in considering and approving the Application. M 17 18 k. The IWACC approved the Application in violation of CGS § 47-42d. 19 I. The decision of the IWACC is based on such errors of law and fact as the 20 record may reveal. 21 40.The Plaintiff is aggrieved by the action of the IWACC pursuant to CGS § 22a- 22 43(a) because he owns a future interest of property that abuts the subject 23 24 property and due to his intervener party status. 25 8 1 WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for: 2 1. A judgment sustaining the Plaintiff's appeal and reversing the decision of the 3 IWACC that granted the Application. 4 2. A judgment remanding and directing the IWACC to deny the Application. 5 3. A judgment directing the IWACC to require a new application for the proposed `° 6 z regulated activities associated with the proposed development that is considered M 8 in conformity with Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations of N 00 a 9 the Town of South Windsor and the Connecticut General Statutes. J °° 10 `^ Dated at Hartford, Connecticut this 6th ° � day of August, 2012. (D0 11 aD J l=J Z 12 THE PLAINTIFF PPELLANT w U 13 0 14 w Jere y B er, Esq. 15 Co mi loner of the Superior Court Z J RIS NO: 428974 16 LO m 17 18 19 20 21 coy F 22 23 c+ 24 25 9 t OWN SE4 C 0 J C U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 j�Os0 ..0 TELEPHONE (860) 64.4 2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 1570 0000 63�7 2904 August 6, 2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC c/o Robert Urso 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Urso: Re: Appl. 12-28P Nutmeg Village Resubdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on July 24, 2012, to approve with modifications Application #12-28P, for a resubdivision to create 6 industrial lots, located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South, I, MF-AA and A-20 zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc.,project # 1308 and dated July 5, 2012 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for 6 industrial lots, numbered 1 -6, the multi-family lot and a lot line revision for 388 Pleasant Valley Road. 2. Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on one side of South Satellite Road. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 6. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 7. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission granted on 7/18/12. 8. Prior to commencement of any site work, a preconstruction meeting must be held with Town Staff. 9. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 10. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 11. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form)for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding. All bonds shall conform to the enclosed bond policy. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. 12. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$350.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 13. The Town Engineer's review comments dated 5/18/12 must be incorporated into the final plans. 14. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, site plans for the individual lots have been approved and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 15. A waiver has been granted to Section C.2.c.3 of the subdivision regulations to not require street trees along the existing frontage. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets # CPI — CP5 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk by November 10, 2012. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Enclosures: Deed/easement policy Bonding policy Quantity Estimate Lighting policy Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Board of Education Registrars 0'N N Sf4 own O-P Soab4t � + Y O c u y �7 �f �, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �dSOR CO�� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 1570 0000 6337 2904 August 6, 2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC c/o Robert Urso 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Urso : Re: Appl. 12-28P Nutmeg Village Special Exception/Site Plan We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on July 24, 2012 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Special Exception to Section 3.4 and Site Plan of Development for approval of a 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village", on the remaining 49.5 acres, for properties identified as R003 Nutmeg Road, L023 Pleasant Valley Road, 388 Pleasant Valley Road and a portion of 438 Pleasant Valley Road, located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South, I, MF-AA and A-20 zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., project # 1308 and dated July 5, 2012 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including bonds in the amount of$ $20,000 to ensure erosion and sedimentation measures, $25,000 for wetlands mitigation, $50,000 for the construction of stormwater structures. 4. A landscape bond in the amount of$50,000 is required and must be submitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy if work is not completed. 5. All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 9.1.3 of the Zoning Regulations. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. This approval does not constitute approval of the sanitary sewer, which can only be granted by the Water Pollution Control Authority. 9. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11. All free standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12. If a State Traffic Commission certificate is required, no building permits will be issued until the certificate has been issued(per CGS §14-311). 13. The clubhouse shall be completed once fifty percent of the units are occupied. 14. The access road shall be completed once seventy-five percent of the units are occupied(prior to the start of Phase 12). 15. The engineering comments dated 5/18/12 shall be incorporated into the final plans. 16. The buffer planting plan is to be reviewed in the field with the applicant's landscape architect and town staff to determine if additional plantings are needed to meet the buffer requirements. 17. The buffer along the easterly property boundary(under the easement) shall include more plantings to meet the buffer requirement. 18. A bike rack shall be provided outside of the community building. 19. An overflow parking area shall be established in the vicinity of the community building. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet CP1- CP5 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations and landscaping plans) must be submitted to this Commission. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely �� c Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission PK/llz cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal I, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission, hereby certify that on July 24, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Robert Urso a Special Exception to Section 3.4 and Site Plan of Development for approval of a 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village", on the remaining 49.5 acres, for properties'identified as R003 Nutmeg Road, L023 Pleasant Valley Road, 388 Pleasant Valley Road and a portion of 438 Pleasant Valley Road, located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South, 1, MF-AA and A-20 zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., project # 1308 and dated July 5, 2012 as revised. GIS PIN: #6510R003,#72901,023, #72900388, #72900428 (See attached) OWNERS OF RECORD: M.G. Realty Limited Partnership, J.E. Shepard Co., Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this day of , 2012. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Chairman Patrick Kennedy Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of , 2012, at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: NUTMEG VILLAGE PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLOT PLAN PREPARED FOR: Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC, Date: 05/15/12 Revisions: 05/21/12 scale 1"=40' Sheets CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-4&CP-5 prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. Beginning at a point on the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road as depicted on the above referenced plans, said point being the south westerly corner of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, and also being the south easterly corner of"Lot B" herein described; Thence N73°27' 24"W along the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road, 203.55 feet to a point; Thence N27° 22' 01"E along the easterly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 280.42 feet to a point; Thence N73°25' 09"W along the northerly property line of N/F Eric A. & Kristin R. Eggleston, 209.25 feet to a point; Thence N27° 18' 51"E along the easterly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 432.92 feet to a point; Thence N53°02' 34"W along the northerly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 360.04 feet to a concrete monument; Thence N15°30' 43"E along the easterly property lines of N/F Realty Transfer, LLC, N/F Mastransit, LLC, &N/F G&R Realty in party by each, 707.74 feet to a point on the southerly property line of land N/F AHS Realty 1, LLC; Thence S65°06' 59"E along the southerly property line of N/F AHS Realty 1, LLC, 135.00 feet to a point; Thence N15° 30' 43"E along the easterly property line of N/F AHS Realty 1, LLC, 296.25 feet to a point; Thence S65°06' 47"E along the southerly property line of proposed industrial lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in party by each, 1,871.04 feet to a point on the westerly property line of Summerwood Estates, LLC; Thence S38°05' 14"W along the westerly property line of N/F Summerwood Estates, 213.18 feet to a brownstone; Thence S39° 30' 29"W along the westerly property lines of N/F Roger Rankin&Evelyn Merrill, N/F Donald J. &Catherine A. Padegimas, N/F Richard A. &Carole T. Morita, N/F Anthony J. &Virginia A. Sansone, N/F Robert Link, Jr.,N/F Nelida A. Picard, N/F Corey C. &Mary Fabrycki, N/F Michael&Ursula Giroux, N/F Dora Reis in party by each, 978.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly property corner of Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra; Thence N65° 18' 14"W along the northerly property lines of N/F Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra, and N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 726.50 feet to a brownstone; Thence S340 35' 34"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 454.87 feet to a point; Thence S3 P 40' 24"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 114.09 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said "Lot B" contains 2,158,289 square feet or 49.547 acres. SOWN Sfq`� — L/�sotdA v/—/�/ c c 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�OSox•co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 Certified #7011 0470 0003 7146 8379 July 20, 2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC C/O Robert Urso 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Appl. #12-28P—Nutmeg Village Dear Mr. Urso: At the July 18, 2012 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved Appl. #12-28P — Nutmeg Village—388 &428 Pleasant Valley Road, 100 South Satellite Road— Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission application for the construction of a 155 unit multi-family development and associated improvements on property located northerly of Pleasant Valley Rd and southerly of South Satellite Rd. Multi-Family (MF) Zone, A-20 Residential Zone, Industrial Zone, with the following conditions: 1. The final approved copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon must be submitted to the Planning Department. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning &Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability, which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on July 18, 2017. It is the landowner(s)/applicant(s)responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 4. Bonds shall be collected in the amount of $20,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls; $25,000 for mitigation; and $50,000 for construction of stormwater structures. 5. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. Staff for approval prior to staring work. existing and must be submitted to Town pp p 9 7. A detailed dredging Ian for the e g p 9 gP 8. Wetlands established for mitigation must be monitored for three years. 9. Hydrology of wetlands immediate to detention basin must be monitored for two years after the establishment of the basin. 10. A 5 year maintenance plan to be submitted for the raingardens and created wetlands to suppress invasive plant colonization. 11. Regarding the management of the area adjacent to the Barrett sedge, the overstory is to be removed to let in more light. 12. The street lighting to be placed on the east side f Pleesant"aa e road to impact the wetlands less. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION �'� +,_'Ljqs / or Elizabeth Warren, Chairperson RECEIVED EW/dt JUL 2 3 ni2 cc: Town Planner Chief Building Official SOUMWINDSORPLANNINGDEpT Design Professionals, Inc. �w \ l)WNER$: J.E SMEPARD CO. APPLICANT, M.G.RULTY 11MliE0 PARTNERSHIP HORBESNOE UNE ASSOCIATE$ fi L.LC. yyR, HARTFORD,CTE08f0T UST WINOSOR HILL.CT 08028 8 HARTNuR WNOSOR.OT 06074 RE 1 � ,-- o° TRI.(B60),521-820a ial.(860)289-6414 T.I.(880)288-2482 n Z i LED - / / I ERIC L k KRISTIN R.EROAD OH ROHAN M.h MIVH EY O TAYLOR Y [ 388 H WINDST VALLEY ROAD {3a H WINDNT VALLEY ROAD f `Y _ ,->.\.�.n° �•, ! SOUTH WINDSOR,Cr OBOI{ 80UTN WINOSOR,CT 08074 T11.( ) ra.(aeo)zsD-aDfs W it liA iz Ifs iF• � 10'RADE EYEROENCf ACCERS OPoVEIYAY / n tA'3{�/ � '/w�+-S�� / � C/ �L LOT t � �1;n 10'RAx GTE \ 4�I' F \\:. // / �LLU � RAPID EH RY 8Ya1EM / Q o x696 /x59,9 LOT 2 to v� / 0£>ENIIJN e'JAN �.�• /';•. F � \��~�• LOT 3 ---- -- — ----- --- -- —1------_ -- T.CHUNE CG 2 `• C WqE EY(PEENCY ACDF9dT>AMIYAY � �{o.> ! � I LOT 4,' REc / J � / � ,II" ®�, �.. I \\\ ,ate \\ � •�®,`., ° `\� IWx>a.{ /� / w ACT/`) ►' \\/ " _ �zu_ 8, x� \ \ x>a — ° _.__ p:,� it SOUTH WIND60R PLANNING DEPT. July 24, 2012 Mr. Patrick Kennedy, Chair Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Planning Department South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kennedy, I am writing in opposition to application 28-12, Nutmeg Village, which will have its only means of ingress and egress on Pleasant Valley Road, directly across the street from the home of Ms. Alicia Baver. Ms. Baver has owned and maintained her architecturally significant house,built in 1925, for over 30 years. It is a Craftsman style home and has been recommended for the National Register of Historic Places. I mention this because I am sure members of the Commission can appreciate the disruption that the number of cars entering and leaving Nutmeg Village, a minimum of 155 per day, will cause and that no homeowner would look forward to. I would also like to remind Commissioners that there has been considerable opposition to this application over the life of its revisions, not only from the industry owners and residents of Hilton Drive, but from those concerned about additional traffic and the effect this development would have on the school population. As I have stated,my concern is the protection of the value of 389 Pleasant Valley Road. I request that, should this application be approved, every consideration be given to mitigating the impact of the flow of traffic and the additional lighting that has been suggested for the project. Sincerely, Virginia Macro, Chair Historic District Commission STANDARD APPROVAL MODIFICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISIONS & RESUBDIVISIONS PROJECT: Nutmeg Village Subdivision APPL#12-28P ARCH_TECT/ENGR: Design Professionals PROJ# Submit mylars of sheets: CP1 —CP5 1. This approval is for 6 industrial lots,numbered 1 -6, the multi-family lot and lot line revision for 388 Pleasant Valley Road. 2. Concrete sidewalks,built to Town specifications, shall be installed on one side of South Satellite Road. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 6. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured,with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 7. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission granted on 7/18/12. 8. Prior to commencement of any site work, a preconstruction meeting must be held with Town Staff. 9. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 10. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities,that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision,must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate,to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 11. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding.All bonds shall conform to the enclosed bond policy. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. 12. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$350.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 13. The Town Engineer's review comments dated 5/18/12 must be incorporated into the final plans. 14 No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, site plans for the 1:dividual lots have been approved and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 15. A waiver has been granted to Section C.2.c.3 of the subdivision regulations to not require street trees along the existing frontage. 16. 17. 18. STANDARD APPROVAL MODIFICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN PROJECT Nutmeg Village Special Exception/Site APPL. #12-28P ENGINEER/ARCHITECT Design Professionals Inc. PROJ.#1308 Submit mylars of sheets: CP1 —CP5 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including bonds in the amount of$ $20,000 to ensure erosion and sedimentation measures, $25,000 for wetlands mitigation, $50,000 for the construction of stormwater structures. 4. A landscape bond in the amount of$50,000 is required and must be submitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy if work is not completed. 5. All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 9.1.3 of the Zoning Regulations. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. This approval does not constitute approval of the sanitary sewer,which can only be granted by the Water Pollution Control Authority. 9. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11. All free standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12. If a State Traffic Commission certificate is required,no building permits will be issued until the certificate has been issued(per CGS §14-311). 13. The clubhouse shall be completed once fifty percent of the units are occupied. 14. The access road shall be completed once seventy-five percent of the units are occupied. rJ�"`6 ov, r� w�.✓ -1 1 { f�t+s.e� I') 15. The engineering comments dated5/18/12 shall be incorporated into the final plans. 16. The buffer planting plan is to be reviewed in the field with the applicant's landscape architect and town staff to determine if additional plantings are needed to meet the buffer requirements. 17. The buffer along the easterly property boundary (under the easement)shall include more plantings to meet the buffer requirement. 18. A bike rack shall be provided outside of the community building. 19. An YC,SeVVC, �'parking area shall be established in the vicinity of the community building. �. 21. The q✓o pe✓ ow r\t4 m u s -e X c cu Cj v. a 1'9 M , n5 how., Iv COJld a1sr, ,oc;Ji4e a ko W h&vm le,<,S pwu)j I*Z41 Special Exception Paragraph NUTMEG VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, SPECIAL EXCEPTION/SITE PLAN - PH 7/10/12 1. Request for request for a resubdivision to create 6 industrial lots on approx. 11 acres and a Special Exception to Section 3.4 and Site Plan of Development for approval of a 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village", on the---rem- ning .5—aeresy located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley-Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South; I, MF-AA and A-20 zones 2. The zone change/general plan of development for the multi-family development was approved on 2/14/12. Two specific concerns mentioned at that time included: Potential effect on drainage on nearby properties must be addressed and Emergency access from the development shall be provided on the site plan. This site plan appears to conform to the approved general plan. 3. Special exception review criteria include: The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan of Conservation and Development. • The application has met the requirements of the zoning regulations. • The land is physically suited to the proposed use. • Minimal, if any, adverse environmental impacts are created. • No traffic or other hazards will be created. • The impacts on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities, street, drainage systems, sidewalks, and other elements of the infrastructure will be minimal. • There will be minimal or no adverse effects on existing uses in the area. • Surrounding property values will be conserved. • The character of the neighborhood will be maintained or minimally disrupted. • The general welfare of the community will be served. • There is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community needs. • Historic factors are adequately protected; or due consideration to preservation of historic factors has been demonstrated. • The overall physical appearance of the proposed development is compatible with surrounding development and the Commission's goals for the neighborhood/corridor. • The architectural design is aesthetically pleasing and blends well into the surrounding area. The Commission may impose additional conditions in accordance with these regulations in order to ensure that all applicable criteria enumerated above and/or within a particular use category are satisfied. 4. For the multi-family development, the impervious coverage allowed is 60%, 13.5% proposed. The buildable acreage for this site is 35.3 acres. The proposed density is 4.38 units per acre, the allowed density is 4.5 units/acre. 5. The number of parking spaces required is 2 spaces per unit, or 310 spaces. The applicant has provided spaces per unit plus for the duplexes and multi- family units and 4 spaces "the single family units. An additional 48 spaces have been included around the development. 6. Multi-family developments are required to provide at least 600 square feet of developed recreation area per unit; 93,000 square feet (or 2.18 ac) of developed recreation area is required for this development. 4ce f ; this requirement is accomplished by the provision of the 2.91 acres of land that has been designated as open space. 7. That area has been provided with two recreation areas, a community clubhouse and a walking trail around the interior of the site. The trail will be stone dust material. 8. All the roadways will be privately owned. An emergency exit, has been provided out to South Satellite Road. 9. There are significant wetlands areas around the property. The applicant is proposing some work within the wetland areas. The IWA/CC opened the public hearing on this item Wednesday, June 20th and the continuation of that hearing is scheduled for tomorrow, July 1 lth. The PZC will be required to hold this hearing open to get the wetland decision before closing the hearing. 10. Public water and sewer are available. Water Pollution Control Authority approval is required. 11. Refuse pick up is proposed to be curbside. If this application is approved, the property owner must execute an agreement permitting the Town to enter the property for purposes of refuse and recycling services; said agreement would also include a hold harmless provision. 1.2. Sidewalks are proposed along one side of all streets. A bus shelter has been shown at the entrance to the development. 13. The landscaping plan calls for street trees along the primary access road and the applicant has provided typical plans for the different unit types. 14. The landscaping plan has incorporated the buffering between this development and the surrounding residential and industrial areas. Cross sections, showing the buffer growth at 5-years and maturity, as required have been provided. The applicant has provided a copy of a draft easement to be executed for the maintenance of the buffer along the easterly property boundary that is on the adjacent property. It should be noted that much of the existing vegetation falls outside of the buffer easement. We would request t = r that additional buffer trees be added to the plans along this boundary' 154A note has been placed on the plans indicating that staff and the landscape architect will evaluate after tree clearing has occurred, and during months without vegetation on the trees, to determine if more buffer plantings are required to meet the intent of the buffer. 15. The Architectural and Design Review Board reviewed this on 6/19/12. —The Board concurred that, he buffer treatment should be re ewed once construction occurs for its-effectiveness and suggested so e treatment other than grass be utilized between the separate driveways. wry, they were satisfied with the proposal as presented. h 16. This request also includes a six lot industrial subdivision with frontage �K lots along South Satellite Road. Minimum lot size under the Industrial zoning is 30,000 sq ft, with 100 feet of frontage. The lot sizes in this subdivision range from approx. 1.4 acres to 3.5 acres. 17. Sidewalks have been proposed along the frontage of the subdivision. 18. There is no requirement for open space in an industrial subdivision. However, there is a buffer required along the residentially zoned property to the south and east. The required buffer is 50 feet from the property line. The site is currently a treed site with primarily deciduous growth. The applicant has submitted a buffer-planting plan. The'focuses of the plantings tb date are to enhance the ey9ting deciduous tr s with under story-plantings in the area of the-di4u .bance for the utiliti sand emergency access ve. This g Y ,� may require theme applicant to select-fvely cut some-of the tre 1s the buffer to provide for areas for the and story to grow. 19. The applicant is requesting a waiver to Section C.2.c.3 of the subdivision regulations which requires street trees to be installed because of the location of the existing power lines. 20. Water and sewer are available to the site. Site plan approval is required on all industrial lots prior to use or construction on the lot. WPCA approval will be required at that time. If approved, the Planning Department has no additional modifications to request. i f yJ July 10,2012 Frank&Jeannine LaCapra 442 Pleasant Valley Road South Windsor, CT As per our conversation 7/09/12 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC asked for permission and you granted Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC or its successor's permission to enter the rear of your property in order to dredge the pond and brook areas to remove the silt. This will be of no cost to you. Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC or its successor's will bear the entire cost. This will be completed by the end of the development. Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC 18-3 Arthur Drive South Wi dsor, Connecticut 06074 By C�2 Date ?—ro-/Z- Frank LaCapra / Date_ J ine LaCapra 171� Date ��` P.O.BOX 1 167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE n SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 th FAX: 860.291.8757 OI'1a�S 25 Anniversary 1986-2011 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 5erwng Connecticut, Massachusetts, t Rhode/stand • Michele Lipe, Town Planner July 10, 2012 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: Emergency Vehicle Access Driveway Nutmeg Village Please be advised that we have elected to change the proposed emergency vehicle access driveway out to South Satellite Road from Option A(easterly side of proposed industrial Lot No. 3),to Option B (westerly side of proposed industrial Lot No. 1), as : depicted on the attached drawing. The withdrawal of Option A in favor of Option B is at the request of Attorney Joseph Hammer on behalf of his client, Unitex, and my client, Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC, has authorized this change. We will formally present this change and the corresponding exhibit tonight at the PZC hearing, and will subsequently modify our drawings to reflect this change. Thank you. Sincerely, • • Peter R. DeMAie, President : Cc: Joseph Hammer, Esq. Steve Gottlieb Robert Urso • G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Letter 7-10-12 Re Ern Access Location.doc • P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.8755 th FAX: 860.291.8757 SS1OMLS 25 Anniversary 1986-2011 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/ PLANNERS / SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island Narrative Statement Nutmeg Village Site Plan/Special Exception/Resubdivision Application Pleasant Valley& South Satellite Roads South Windsor, Connecticut : DPI Proj.No. 1308 May 21, 2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC of South Windsor has applied to the South Windsor Planning& Zoning Commission for site plan of development/special exception approval for a residential community to be known as Nutmeg Village on a 49.547 acre tract off Pleasant Valley Road in the MF-AA residential zone, and for resubdivision approval to create the subject Nutmeg Village parcel fronting on Pleasant Valley Road(Parcel 13), and to create six(6) industrial lots fronting on South Satellite Road on 11 acres in the industrial zone. The existing single family residence at 388 Pleasant Valley Road will remain on its own conforming lot(Parcel A). The applicant is proposing an exceptional residential common interest ownership community, i.e., "planned community", primarily designed to attract and retain Metro Hartford's young middle class workforce, as well as industrial building lots to complete the South Satellite Road industrial area. The total combined area of this mixed use development is approximately 61 acres. Nutmeg Village will have fifteen detached single family homes (capes, ranches and colonials), one of each style situated at the development's entrance on Pepin Place, and another twelve on a cul- de-sac street, Shepard Way,in the easterly portion of the property. Twelve attached duplex homes will also be located on Shepard Way. The central and westerly areas of Nutmeg Village will contain 128 attached townhouse residences, four or six homes to a building. The entire development will thus transition from single-family to multi-family, with increasing densities, going from east to west(i.e., away from existing abutting residential areas), and will have a total of 155 units. All streets will be private and maintained by the Nutmeg Village association. All residences will have, as standard amenities, granite countertops in the kitchen,tile floors in the bathrooms, an exterior deck, an energy star rating, an attached garage, and a private driveway in : front of the garage. Exterior design features include clapboard and shingle siding, arched eyebrow windows, steep pitched roofs, architectural trim and columns. All single family homes will offer an attached two car garage. All other homes will have an attached one car garage. The ranch style (one floor living) single-family residences will offer two bedrooms, and the other single-family homes will have two or three bedrooms(buyer's choice). Single-family residences will have a variety of sizes and sale prices. The ranch style will have approximately 1,420 square feet. The cape will have approximately 1,364 square feet, and the colonial will have approximately 1,504 square feet. Single family homes will have a building height(zoning definition)ranging from 16 feet to 26 feet. All duplex units will have approximately 1,474 square feet and two or three bedrooms (buyer's choice), and a height of approximately 26 feet. All 82 interior townhouse units and 28 townhouse end units will have two floors of living space over a basement and garage, 1,174 square feet of living space, 1 1/2 bathrooms,two bedrooms and a maximum building height of 30 • G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc : feet, six inches, which is well below that which is allowed in the Multi-Family Zone. Eighteen of the two-story end units will have approximately 1,479 sq. ft., two bedrooms and 2 1/2 bathrooms. Anticipated sales prices are$189,900 for the 82 interior townhouse units, $199,900 for 28 of the townhouse end units, $219,900 for the 18 two-story end unit townhouses, $234,900 for the duplex units, $259,900 for the Cape style single-family home, $274,900 for the Colonial style single : family home, and$289,900 for the ranch style single family home. Accordingly, some 110(70%) of the Nutmeg Village residences will be attractively priced at under$200,000.00. This should bode well for the goal of retaining and attracting young middle class professionals for employers in South Windsor and surrounding communities. • The applicant has been planning for this new and innovative residential community for approximately three and one-half years. Part of this process was to assemble a team of leading consulting firms. These firms and their respective assignments are: 1)Willard&Alexander(legal); 2) Design Professionals, Inc. (civil&traffic engineering, land planning, land surveying, landscape architecture and assistance in fiscal and school impact analyses); 3) Capital Studio Architects (architecture); 4) Connecticut Planning&Development/Donald Poland(fiscal& school impact analyses); 5) GEI Consultants(environmental studies); 6)Highland Soils (soil scientist); 7) William Moorhead(botanist); and 8) Shipman&Goodwin(initial legal analyses). Team members and the applicant have conferred with numerous Town and regional officials during this planning period. An earlier application by Horseshoe Lane Associates,known as Nutmeg Commons&Nutmeg Estates,had proposed a 202 unit residential condominium entirely on a 55.47 acre tract fronting on South Satellite Road, and with access only from South Satellite Road through an industrial area. At several public hearings,industrial neighbors expressed strong concerns. That application was ultimately denied by the Planning &Zoning Commission on May 11,2010. The strong message to the applicant and his design team was to abandon any notion of access from South Satellite Road, and to investigate access from the south(through properties owned by others)to Pleasant Valley Road. • In the intervening 19 month period,the applicant and his consultants worked to overcome the objections to the original proposal. The first major task was to analyze the feasibility of an access drive from Pleasant Valley Road to serve a new residential community. The team immediately focused on a 4.75 acre undeveloped parcel owned by a local firm,the J.E. Shepard Company. It was the only option. Unfortunately,that parcel had considerably less frontage on a public street than required for a Multi-Family zone change. Regardless,the design team then proceeded to develop a conceptual layout for a new residential community which had its sole access point at Pleasant Valley Road and which incorporated all of the Shepard property, and only a portion of the i original property owned by M. G. Realty. Perhaps equally as important, was the retention of industrial zoning on the south side of South Satellite Road, and no vehicular or pedestrian access thereto. : The second important task was to meet with the two industrial neighbors on South Satellite Road who had objected to our original application and had been represented by legal counsel, for without their consent,the applicant had determined he would not proceed with another application. The industrial neighbors (Unitex and Connecticut Packaging Materials) graciously agreed to host such a meeting in Hartford in August of 2010, at Day Pitney's offices, and were favorably disposed toward the new concept plan. They particularly liked that the opposite side of Sluth • salon • r�s�sionais i G:\jobs\1308\dots\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-27-12.doc : Satellite Road from their operations would remain industrial and contain six proposed industrial building lots, and that access to the residential community would be via Pleasant Valley Road. The next task was to secure approval from J.E. Shepard to flag the site's wetlands and to prepare boundary and topographic surveys. With that completed, an advanced concept layout was prepared and shown to the Planning&Zoning Commission's Chairman and Vice-Chairman at an informal meeting. They then recommended that the 60 acre mixed use schematic plan be informally presented to the entire Commission,which occurred in January of 2011. The plan depicted a new public entrance road from Pleasant Valley,terminating at a cul-de-sac,which gave the development the required 200 feet of road frontage. Off the cul-de-sac was a proposed six unit multi-family building. A new private roadway then proceeded back into the development. The residential layout had some similar characteristics with the original development, albeit with considerably fewer residences (158, down from 202). While all sitting commissioners expressed that they favored the new conceptual industrial and residential plan, concerns were made with respect to the proposed Town road,need for a bus shelter,traffic, desire to show more surface parking, and that they preferred a clubhouse and recreation area at the beginning of the development rather than a six unit residential building. Of note is that the meeting was also attended by representatives from Unitex and Connecticut Packaging Materials, who expressed their support for the new plan. That was also favorably received by the Commissioners. Subsequent to that meeting,there were numerous sessions with Town staff(planning, wetlands, engineering, sewer, fire, police and building),to be sure we identified any major concerns and that they were approving of the proposed street and building layout. During that process, some Town staff also expressed concern about the proposed public street. The applicant and design team then focused on two issues: 1) The proposed public street; and 2) Ambiguous language in the zoning regulations with respect to the definition of basement, and the absence of any definitions for habitable space and story. The latter matter was first addressed with a zoning amendment application, the language of which was modified and approved by the Commission. The former matter was also addressed with a zoning amendment application,which, if approved,would have allowed reduced street frontage in the MF zone if the development were set way back from the public street. The matter became moot when an abutter and the Nutmeg Village developer agreed to initial terms on adding the property at 388 Pleasant Valley Road to the development, which, in conjunction with the Shepard property, would provide the 200 feet of required frontage, and the entire Nutmeg Village development could be served by private roads. The amendment was then withdrawn before commission action, even though it may have had sufficient support for approval. • The design before the Commission with the zone change and general development application embraced a number of changes of note from the layout discussed informally in January of 2011. First is that the total number of homes was 155, or three fewer from the January plan, and 47 fewer than the May,2010 plan. Second is that a bus shelter had been added. Third is that the entrance drive had been adjusted horizontally and vertically to maximize sight line at Pleasant Valley Road. Fourth is that with the addition of the Eggleston property (single-family home and acreage),the applicant had 200 feet of frontage, and placed three single-family homes(one of each style)at the beginning of the development. Fifth is that the house at 388 Pleasant Valley Road would remain on a reconfigured conforming lot, separate from Nutmeg Village, and with a new improved driveway access over to our new street,Pepin Place,which eliminates the old driveway curb cut on Pleasant % Valley Road in furtherance of access management principles. Sixth is that the prior six Uft multi- . • esign • rofessioneb • G:\jobs\l308\docs\Applications 201 2\1 308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc : family dwelling at the beginning of the development was eliminated, in favor of a recreation area and a 1,120 square feet clubhouse with associated parking. Seventh was that an active recreation area was eliminated in one section at the north side of Nutmeg Village in favor of preserving a : woodland area. Eighth is that more of the six unit multi-family buildings with the stepped down end units were added in order to facilitate more handicap accessible units, as may be required. Ninth is that the duplex building design had been improved. Tenth is that a strip of property to the east of our entrance drive at 438 Pleasant Valley Road(Taylor)was added to the zone change, in order to reduce the Industrial Zone buffer on that neighbor's lot from a full 100 feet(50 for I, 50 for A-20), down to the 25 feet associated with the MF zone (I Zone no longer in play there). It also eliminated the necessity for a buffer on a part of a lot in front of 438 Pleasant Valley Road(new home is presently under construction on that lot). Eleventh was that the public cul-de-sac street was eliminated, and was replaced with a boulevard entrance, and all proposed streets will be private. Twelfth was that we added more surface parking spaces throughout the development, in : order to supplement garage and driveway parking. And the final modification at that time was to add a phasing plan(4 phases). We believe these changes made this a better plan from that informally presented to the Commission and staff in early 2011. On February 14, 2012 the Planning& Zoning Commission approved the zone change and general plan of development application for Nutmeg Village. That was followed by a State Traffic Commission"administrative decision" approval issued on April 16, 2012. • The zoning regulations provide for a two-application approval process. The first application is for the zone change and general plan of development only for the residential development(even : though the industrial zone for the six proposed lots will remain). The second application(subject) is for a site plan of development and a special exception for the Nutmeg Village residential community, along with a resubdivision application in order to create the six industrial building lots,to create the Nutmeg Village parcel, and to create the new conforming lot for the existing house westerly of the new entrance road. In order to understand the potential fiscal and school impacts of Nutmeg Village and of the : adjoining six lot industrial park,the applicant engaged Connecticut Planning&Development, LLC % and Design Professionals, Inc. to undertake a study of all of South Windsor's existing non age- restricted planned residential communities,to project public school enrollment at the subject site, : and to look at taxes and fees with respect to this residential development,the six lot industrial park, and development if the site were to remain in the industrial zone and built out with manufacturing, warehousing and other allowed industrial uses. The results of this study were submitted as part of the zone change/general plan application process, and are hereby incorporated into this application by reference. • The landscape architectural design of Nutmeg Village has been undertaken to ensure appropriate buffer treatments on the parcel's periphery, much of which will incorporate existing trees and shrubs to be complemented by interplanted nursery stock to fill in any gaps in key areas. Water quality basins will incorporate plantings to not only clean stormwater runoff, but to add to the site's beauty. Many acres of the property will remain undisturbed habitat. The entrance drive will have a low level masonry entrance sign(maximum of six feet in height) located in a center median landscaped with perennials, as well as evergreen and flowering shrubs for a beautiful boulevard effect.Nearly a mile of walking/jogging trails are provided. Two active recreation lawn areas, one behind the clubhouse and a larger field at the end of Shepard Way, are depicted on the site plan. % Exterior lighting systems will be of residential scale and will have full cut off luminaire uch that e� G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc fft : light will not emit off-site and to ensure dark sky compliance.A landscaped area adjacent to the entrance drive with a vehicular pull-off is being provided for a central mail delivery system. Sidewalks are provided on one side of all streets. The total length of the streets in Nutmeg Village : is approximately 3,100 lineal feet, all of which will be 24 feet in width and private(owned by the Nutmeg Village planned community association). The applicant is donating to the Town a 15 feet wide strip of land along the entire Pleasant Valley Road frontage of the proposed Nutmeg Village : planned community and also along the frontage of the remaining house lot at 388 Pleasant Valley Road. This will serve to expand the Town's street right of way. Parking will far exceed that which is required(310 required/388 proposed). These include 170 spaces within garages, 170 spaces in driveways, and 48 spaces in small parking areas spread throughout the development, including at the clubhouse and at the two outdoor active recreation areas. : The stormwater conveyance system consists of a mostly piped system leading to one of three detention basins; two smaller basins for the area near the clubhouse and south of the brook,and a larger one north of the brook. All detention basins will discharge to the brook near the southeastern corner of the large parcel, near where the natural drainage currently leaves the site, and will achieve a reduction in peak discharges from existing conditions. The engineered site plan also incorporates three other distinct stormwater design features. The first are raingardens,which will facilitate surface water recharge into existing wetlands and will serve to enhance water : quality. The second is a curtain drain along the easterly property line, essentially from the primary detention basin northerly to the area easterly of the proposed single-family residences on Shepard : Way. This will not only serve to drain the area in the vicinity of the proposed residences, allowing for basements,but will also aid in reducing groundwater levels for adjoining lots on Hilton Drive which have had chronic drainage issues for years (groundwater and surface water). The third is our drainage and grading design which will reduce surface water flows to the adjoining Hilton Drive neighborhood, and thus diminishes the potential for recurring surface drainage ponding on those lots. The existing utilities have sufficient capacity to support the development. Sanitary sewers for the : area south of the brook will gravity flow to the existing sewer in Pleasant Valley Road. The remainder of the development will gravity flow to a pump station near the brook, which will then pump the effluent a short distance to the gravity flow system near the clubhouse. The six industrial lots will afford gravity flow laterals to the existing system in South Satellite Road, and will connect to other utilities in the street. Gas,telecommunications, data and public water will be able to serve the Nutmeg Village residential site from South Satellite Road and/or Pleasant Valley Road, as determined by the respective utility companies. : The proposed Pepin Place crossing of the watercourse on the property will be achieved through installation of an open bottom arched design prefabricated concrete bridge,which will have minimal impact on the brook(as opposed to,for example, a culvert system). Design Professionals, Inc. has prepared a comprehensive traffic impact analysis of the subject development and of the surrounding street network, including numerous intersections,the most important of which is the signalized intersection of Route 5 and Pleasant Valley Road. This analysis concludes that the proposed development and projected vehicular traffic will not adversely impact the operations of the street network, and that the street network has the capacity to readily accommodate all site-generated traffic.Nutmeg Village will not congest the Alic • G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc : roadways. This site is uniquely positioned such that all vehicles will ingress and egress via collector streets (Pleasant Valley Road and Routes 5 and 30)and not through adjoining residential neighborhoods, such as the Hilton Drive area immediately to the east. The State Traffic Commission,the Connecticut Department of Transportation, and the local traffic authority have concurred that no offsite improvements will be required to accommodate this development. The subject 49.547 acre residential parcel is in fact a transitional parcel, situated between a large residential area to the northeast, east, south and west(although the residential area to the south and west is technically in the industrial zone), and an industrial area to the north,west and southwest. The South Windsor Plan of Conservation and Development states—"Wherever residential uses abut industrial and commercial uses, incompatibilities tend to occur. To mitigate this effect, transitional uses are encouraged along zone boundaries. Zone changes to expand industrial/commercial areas, or zone changes to expand residential areas, would occur primarily in the transition areas along existing zone boundaries."Nutmeg Village is a transitional residential use along the zone boundaries separating single-family residential and industrial uses. We are proposing a transition within the development, starting with single-family residences adjoining the abutting single family residences on adjoining properties,then moving into duplexes, and then finally multi-family uses farthest away from the existing neighborhoods. Accordingly,the proposed development is consistent with the goals, objectives and recommendations of the community's Plan of Conservation&Development. In its February 14, 2012 approval,the Planning&Zoning Commission concluded that the Nutmeg Village zone change was in conformance with said plan. With respect to the special exception,the proposed development is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Multi-Family zoning district, and of the zoning regulations in general, all of which was previously addressed in the public hearings for the zone change and general plan of development. In addition to that discussed above, and that which will be presented in other documents and at the public hearing, we offer the following comments: 1)The concentration of recent residential development patterns favoring McMansions (large and expensive single family homes)and age-restricted communities has had an appreciable adverse impact on our young workforce and their unmet housing needs. It has contributed to the graying of our workforce and communities. This development will begin to address that problem within South Windsor and the region, and will aid in attracting and retaining younger households. 2) The subject property, containing 38 acres of uplands (non-wetlands), free of federal flood plain, and gently sloping, is physically suited for the proposed residential development. 3)The applicant and design team have conferred with our environmental consultants, as well as local and state experts. The resulting development will thus not have an adverse impact on the environment beyond that normally associated with land development. Measures have been taken to preserve habitat, and undisturbed natural areas in bulk. We have also designed our stormwater runoff and erosion control systems to preserve water quality, e.g., we have utilized water quality basins,raingardens, and swales. Environmental impacts are being held to a minimum. Total proposed wetlands impact is 1,900 square feet(.04 acre),proposed tributary stream alteration is 70 lineal feet for the stream crossing at Pepin Place(although an arched bridge is being installed to keep that disturbance negligible), and we are proposing measures to stabilize 125 lineal feet of the stream embankment to curtail erosion. The applicant's environmental consultants have identified a prior agricultural area which has some evidence of agricultural chemicals in the soil, and that area, in latter phases of the development's construction schedule,will be mitigated to achieve residential soil standards. There is some evidence of a very small tiger beetle colony on the site along an old cartpath, and the applicant's environmental consultants have been working with the State DEEP to relocat this sign • G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc • species of special concern, if necessary. The area of the tiger beetle colony is also in the area : scheduled for the latter phases of the development. The applicant's consultants have also identify- three locations within a central wetlands which contain Barra 's sedge, an endangered plant : species,but those areas are not being disturbed, and indeed virtually all of the property's wetlands (18.9 % of the tract)will remain in open space. 4) The site will be appropriately served by public sewers,public water, storm drainage,natural gas,power, cable and other utility services which cave capacity to support the development,from either Pleasant Valley Road and/or South Satellite Road. 5) Given that traffic will be separate from the adjoining neighborhood, and our traffic engineer has concluded this development will not adversely impact area traffic operations (STC has concurred), and that the subject development has been well planned and meets or exceeds the setback and buffering provisions of the zoning regulations,we believe Nutmeg Village will not : impact the surrounding area. 6)We believe industrial development of the subject property(MF- AA zone)would have had an adverse impact on the surrounding residential area and potentially on adjoining residential property values, however,that impact has been mitigated with the Nutmeg Village proposal. Our effort to redesign the site to retain an industrial area along the south side of South Satellite Road, including required buffer areas on those lots, should also serve to preserve, protect and grow that street's industrial uses. 7) We are unaware of any historic factors affecting this application. 8)We are anticipating that the neighborhood will prefer our proposal over that of industrial developmentlzoning, and that the unmet housing needs of the young workforce within our Town and the region justify this application. 9) The Nutmeg Village design, employing aesthetically pleasing architecture, landscape architecture, site planning and engineering,will : blend in well with the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant is proposing 15 construction phases for Nutmeg Village's 155 residences (see phasing plan within the site plan package), with an anticipated commencement in the latter part of 2012, and completion in or around 2016. The six industrial frontage lots along South Satellite Road are expected to be marketed and developed over a longer term(on average one or fewer lots per year). In conclusion,Nutmeg Village is an appropriately designed and well suited location for a 155 unit planned residential community addressing the housing needs of South Windsor's and Metro Hartford's young middle class professional workforce. Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood are negligible. They are far better than the impacts from industrial development, had the zone remain unchanged. No appreciable traffic congestion will result from this proposal, and state regulators and the local traffic authority have concurred. The economic benefits to the Town are considerable, and the study prepared by our team of consultants has this well documented. We thank you for your consideration of this application. • G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Site Plan Narrative 5-21-12.doc Nil-15 VTAK 3 . STATE OF CONNECTICUT `CNNECT/eGr DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 zF ARMS? "` 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546 OF 7Rp NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06131-7546 Phone: (860)594-3020 April 16,2012 Mr.Andrew Krar,P.E. Design Profesionals 425 Sulfivan Avenue P.O.Box 1167 South Windsor,CT 06074 STC#132-1204-01 Dear Mr.Krar: Subject: Town of South Windsor Previously Issued Certificate No. 958-Nutmeg Commercial Center Current Proposal: Nutmeg Village R003 Nutmeg Road,L023,388,&438 Pleasant Valley Road Current Owners: M.G.Realty Limited Partnership/The J.E. Shepard Company/Eric A&Kristin R Eggleston Administrative Decision No. 64 A review of your February 24,2012 request for an Administrative Decision regarding the subject development not previously considered under Certificate No.958 has been completed. Certificate No. 958 issued on August 15, 1989 allowed for 500,000 square feet of light industrial use on multiple individual lots. The certificate requirements were not satisfied and the certificate ultimately expired. A number of the individual lots were subsequently developed with light industrial land uses. However,the overall development was never fully built.The current Nutmeg Village proposal will develop several of the remaining lots for 292,276 square feet(140 condominium units)of residential use, 15 single family homes,and 86,000 square feet of light industrial land use. It has been determined that the current proposal will not substantially affect state highway traffic operations in the area. Lieutenant Richard A. Bond,the Local Traffic Authority representative,concurred with these findings on April 16,2012. Consequently, an Administrative Decision is hereby rendered that formal State Traffic Commission action under Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut regarding the proposed change in use is not required. The decision is based,in part,on the enclosed plan prepared by Design Professionals entitled"Overall Site Plan,Nutmeg Village, 100 South Satellite Road, L023 &388 Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor, Connecticut"Sheet LA-1,dated February 23,2012. The decision shall not be effective until a copy of this letter has been filed on the municipal land records,in accordance with the enclosed procedures,and this office has received a copy of the recorded letter. Upon filing of the letter,this office would have no objection to the issuance of any building or foundation permits associated with the Nutmeg Village development. Any future expansion or proposed land use changes shall only be allowed subject to review by this office and, if necessary,formal State Traffic Commission action. /� foot Sincerely, AT RECORDED IN SOUTH W DSORI�. David A. Sawicki BY. TOWN CLERK Executive Director Ss�S tuv+ State Traffic Commission Enclosures RECEIVED cc: Lieutenant Richard A.Bond—richard.bond@southwindsor.org—plan attached Mr. Christopher Dougan—christopher.dougan@southwindsor.org—plan attached MAY Z (1} An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled or Recovered Paper SOUTH WIND60R PLANNING DEPT. a ti BUFFER AREA EASEMENT PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ROHAN M. TAYLOR and MICHELLE D. TAYLOR, of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut (the foregoing party hereinafter referred to collectively as "Grantor"), and HORSESHOE LANE ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company with offices in the of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut (the foregoing parties being referred to hereinafter as "Grantee"), for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, received to Grantor's full satisfaction of the Grantee, does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns an easement encompassing the right, privilege and authority to construct and to perpetually maintain that certain buffer area (hereinafter referred to as the "Buffer Area") , in, through, upon and over a 25 foot wide strip of land running along the entire westerly boundary of property of the Grantor at 438 Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor, Connecticut, said Buffer Area being more particular described on Schedule A attached hereto and being made a part hereof. Together with the right, privilege, and authority to trespass on, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and repairing of said Buffer Area, an additional Ten (10) feet outside of, and next easterly and abutting the Buffer Area, which right to trespass shall terminate upon formal acceptance of the completed Buffer Area by the Town of South Windsor; and to be reasserted only on the occasion and for the duration of subsequent maintenance or repair by the Grantor. Within said parcel(s) described in Schedule A, the Grantee, its successors assigns, shall have the right to perform all such construction and/or maintenance activities, and to pass and repass with men, equipment, to operate equipment, excavate and fill, and to bring in and install materials, all of which may be necessary and/or incidental to the construction, maintenance and/or repair of the Buffer Area. The Grantor herein, for themselves and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures in the Buffer Area which may endanger or interfere with its intended use or purpose. The Grantor herein for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, reserves the right to themselves, their heirs, 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. South Windsor July , 2012 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 2012 by ROHAN M. AAYLOR and MICHELLE D. TAYLOR, as their free act and deed. Commissioner of the Superior Court Notary Public My Commission Expires: STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. South Windsor July , 2012 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 2012 by Robert Urso as manager of HORSESHOE LANE ASSOCIATES, LLC, as the free act and deed of said limited liability company. Commissioner of the Superior Court Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 t Y^+ - P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE: 860.291.875 5 FAX: 8onalsi .8757 c.com www.design professi onalsi nc.com Blom M CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/ PLANNERS /SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode Island July 5, 2012 : Ms. Michele Lipe, Town Planner Town of South Windsor, CT 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 • Re: Responses to Planning Department Comments (Dated 6/27/12) DPI No.: 1308 Nutmeg Village - Pleasant Valley Road Dear Ms. Lipe: : Our office has received your Planning Department review comments dated June 27, 2012, for the Nutmeg Village application. Abbreviated responses are provided below, and your memorandum is attached for reference. : 1. An emergency access has been shown to South Satellite Road on the plans. 2. A Landscape Schedule has been provided for each separate building type on sheet L-7. : 3. The middle driveways have been narrowed to accommodate a 2.5' planting strip as shown on sheet L-7. 4. A draft buffer easement is being prepared and will be provided for review and approval. • Notes have been added to the plans to recover the areas of encroachment. A note has been added to sheet L-8 that buffer plantings shall be reviewed by Town Staff and the Landscape Architect prior to installation. 5. The bus shelter has been moved out of the easement area. 6. One light pole was added on Pepin Place near station 22+00, one has been added to Shepard Way near station 5+00, and others have been adjusted so that no points along the : sidewalks will have a lighting level of 0.0, even when not accounting for any ambient light that may originate from the buildings. 7. The label has been corrected. 8. A note for trees to be removed along Pleasant Valley Road has been added to sheet L-2. 9. The sidewalk has been adjusted with the exception of the area of the brook crossing. • The phasing plan has been adjusted and a note added to the plan regarding the timing of the : clubhouse completion. Sidewalks along the frontage of the industrial lots have been added to the plans. The applicant will request a waiver of the street tree requirement. Given the location of the recently upgraded utility lines along the property frontage and the problems with trees impacting : utility lines in recent storms, we feel it would not be prudent to plant new trees near the utility lines. Should you have any questions or require any additional information. Please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, : ESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. Benjamin P. Wheeler, RLA v x P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 n PHONE: 860.291.8755 FAX: 860.291.8757 Iswww.design professionalsionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode Island • July 5, 2012 Town of South Windsor, CT Attn:Jeff Doolittle, P.E. - Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Responses to Town Staff Comments (Dated 5/18/12) DPI No.: 1308 Nutmeg Village - Pleasant Valley Road : • Dear Mr. Doolittle: • Our office has received your engineering site plan comments dated May 18, 2012, for the Nutmeg Village application. Abbreviated responses are provided below, and your memorandum is attached for reference. 1. Plot Plan drawings (sheets CP-1 thru CP-5) show the required labels and dimensions. • 2. This area is proposed on street parking. 3. Bus shelter has been added to the plans. 4. The clubhouse will be constructed prior to the completion of 50%of the residential units. 5. The side walk has been realigned. • 6. Sidewalks are now continuous through the driveways. 7. A 18' wide emergency access has been added. The connection will be between Kennison Court and South Satellite Road. • 8. The horizontal geometry for all roadways are described and annotated on the plot plans (sheets CP-1 thru CP-5). e : 9. At least 20' of driveway is provided between the back of sidewalk and garages for all residential units. 10. Street lights, street name signs, traffic control signs, and stop bars are shown on the plot plans (sheets CP-1 thru CP-5). : .. v - 11. Vertical curves have been removed. See roadway profiles.(sheets PP-1 thru PP-4). : 12. Only the first three buildings will not be provided with sanitary sewer basement service. • • 13. With the exception of the first three buildings, all residential units with basements will not : require a sump pump. : • 14. The first three buildings will require a sump pump. This is noted on the roadway profile drawings (sheets PP-1 thru PP-4). : 15. The first floor elevations of all units are shown on the grading plans (sheets CG-1 thru CG-5). 16. The maximum slopes for the three detention basins are noted on the grading plans. (sheets CG-1 thru CG-5). : 17. The trash rack detail has been revised. The detail depicts a trash rack made of W smooth steel bars with 3" openings. 18. Riprap emergency spillway Swale has been added to pond #1 (sheet CG-3). 19. It is expected that no utility conflicts will occur. 20. We believe that the proposed site elevations and stormwater collection system will provide : for a quality environment free from any detrimental impacts due to shallow groundwater conditions. : 21. Roadway underdrains are proposed along Shepard Way. This is the proposed road where there is a substantial earthwork cut. Refer to roadway profile drawing on sheet PP-4. • 22. At this time, individual connections to each residential unit are not depicted on the plans. It is our intention to approach this issue with the Water Pollution Control Authority(WPCA). Should the WPCA require individual connections, the changes to the plans will be made. 23. The sanitary sewer collection system has been designed in conformance with the following requirements set forth in the Town of South Windsor Public Improvement Specifications: • All building sewers will be 6" PVC SDR 35 with minimum 2% slope and 3' cover. • With the exception of the first three units, all buildings with basements, will be provided with sanitary service to such basements. 0 All sanitary sewer mains will be 8" PVC SDR 35 with minimum 0.5% slope. : • Assuming that all units have three bedrooms, the anticipated design flow will be 0.43 cubic feet per second (Assuming 4.0 peaking factor& 150 gpd per bedroom). An 8" sewer flowing full yields a carrying velocity of 3.2 ft/s. : Design of the sanitary sewer pump station has not been completed. It is expected that plans : will be prepared by Blake Equipment. 24. At this time, the bridge design is not complete and is shown on the plans for illustrative purposes. : 25. Guard rails have been added to the plot plans (sheet CP-1). However, it is anticipated that the extents and connection points of the guardrails with the bridge parapets, will likely be changed following completion of the bridge design. • 26. The increase of runoff from the Pleasant Valley Road watershed was due to additional runoff created by the proposed site driveway. The plans depicted the first 60 feet of the driveway as sloped toward Pleasant Valley Road. The profile of the driveway has been adjusted so that the high point of the driveway is less than 15' from Pleasant Valley Road. Although there will be a slight increase contributing to the Town road, it will be negligible. • It is expected that no detrimental impacts to downstream resources will occur as a result of : the proposed development. Although peak runoff volumes will result, peak rates of discharge will be less than what currently exists. 27. At this time, the applicant is unsure whether permission to work on the pond has been granted. A comprehensive plan will be provided in the future. However, it is expected that the work will begin after the majority of the development has been constructed. The work will include dredging the pond to remove a substantial amount of sediment deposits clearly visible throughout. : • 28. The plot plans show the proposed widening (sheet CP-1). • : Should you have any questions or require any additional information. Please feel free to contact our office. • Sincerely, • Andrew Krar, P.E. : • roagoionals SOUTH WI N D S O R Matthew D.Reed,Esq.Chief of Police POLICE 151 Sand Hill Road South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 860-644-2551 • Fax 860-644-0515 Monday, January 23, 2012 [1RECEIVED JM 2 4 2012 Michele Lipe SOUTH W"OR PUNNING DEFT. Town Planner Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Michele: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed NUTMEG VILLAGE development. I am not satisfied with the single point of access to the development. It is my opinion that there must be an alternate route of access to the development. Ideally,-the development would be accessible by at least two access roads at all times. However, I would settle for at least one full time access road and one "emergency" access roadway that could be easily opened and have a suitable surface for alternate vehicle accessibility during"emergency"conditions. This past year's storms demonstrated how easily a neighborhood can become isolated and inaccessible for emergency traffic. For the safety and security of the development's residents, it is in everyone's best interest to provide alternate access to the site. I would recommend that the alternate access road be constructed as soon as practicable but not later than a point in time in which the construction of homes is substantially complete. Regards, Ma hew D. Reed Chid of Police i V G E I cv'�5ult'wu- Geotechnical July 9, 2011 Environmental Project 092900 Water Resources Mr. Robert Urso Ecological 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Groundwater Evaluation DECEIVED Proposed Drainage Features 1 I I F Nutmeg Village i u L + L U Z South Windsor, Connecticut 1► Npyouth E7L Windsor ANDS AGENCY CONSERVATION COMAMSSION Dear Mr. Urso: GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) is providing the letter report as requested by Design Professionals, Inc. (DPI)to summarize the results of our groundwater analysis of the drainage features as part of the proposed Nutmeg Village Development(Site). Project Description Nutmeg Village Development is proposed on an approximately 62-acre property on the east side of Route 5 near Satellite Road. This letter report focuses on the drainage features below and around Shepard Way, located in the southeast portion of the Site. The drainage features include a passive underdrain beneath Shepard Way,passive footer drains that span from Lot 16 to Lot 19 and from Lot 34-35 to Lot 36-37, and a drainage basin referred to as Pond No. 1 in the southeastern corner of the Site. Groundwater Evaluation We evaluated the potential wetland impact of the underdrain, footer drains, and drainage basin under and around the proposed Shepard Way in the proposed Nutmeg Village Development. Our analysis considers the horizontal distance between the point of drawdown and the undisturbed water table,referred to as the radius of influence. The location and depths of the drainage features vary, so each feature was considered independently. However, some aspects of the analyses stayed the same such as the method of analysis and the soil parameters. The radius of influence of drainage features is most commonly calculated for mechanically pumped wells and is typically considered a function of pumping capacity. The underdrain, footer drains, and drainage basin proposed for Nutmeg Village are passive features that will drain due to gravity. Because of the unusual circumstances of www.geiconsultants.com GEI Consultants,Inc. 455 Winding Brook Drive,Suite 201,Glastonbury,Connecticut 06033 860.368.5300 fax:860.368.5307 Mr. Robert Urso Groundwater Evaluation July 9, 2012 Page 2 of 4 this analysis,we used two methods to calculate the radius of influence. The first method is prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)for blanket drains. The FHWA method is a function of the change in head, or the difference between the seasonal high water table and the elevation of the drain. A blanket drain,which is a passive system, is most similar to the drainage systems near Shepard Way. The second method is an empirical formula used to determine the approximate radius of influence for a pumped well. This method is a function of the change in head and the permeability of the surrounding soil. As previously stated,the drainage features near Shepard Way are passive systems that will not be pumped. Pumping a system increases the drawdown capacity and the radius of influence. The radius of influence found through this method is an extremely conservative, upper bound estimate. For the underdrain and footer drain analyses, we considered the change in head to be the difference between the seasonal high water elevation at the location of the drain or the nearest wetland,whichever was higher, and the invert of the pipe. By using the invert of the pipe,we are assuming that the pipe is dry and the water table is at or below the bottom of the pipe. This is a conservative assumption because at times of high rainfall or a seasonal high water table,we anticipate the pipe will be wet and the change in head will be smaller. For the drainage basin analysis,we considered the change in head to be the difference between the seasonal high water table at the nearest wetland and the outlet of the drainage basin. This difference is 7.7 feet. This comparison is conservative because the true water table in the wetland is more likely below the wetland surface. It is unlikely that a difference in water table of 7.7 feet would exist across a horizontal distance of only 20 feet. The Test Pits provided by DPI indicated that the subsurface stratigraphy is loose sand with trace silt and gravel. We estimate that the permeability of this material is 1 x 10-3 cm/s based on published values. Results We evaluated the drainage features described above and compiled them into the summary table below. As previously mentioned, we believe the FHWA method provides a reliable estimate for the radius of influence. The alternate method, described in Construction Dewatering: A Guide to the Theory and Practice, by J.M. Powers assumes the system is pumped and provides a conservative,upper bound estimate. Mr. Robert Urso Groundwater Evaluation July 9, 2012 Page 3 of 4 Approximate Radius of Influence(ft) Measured Drainage Feature Distance from Wetland (ft) FHWA(1980) Powers(1981) Underdrain 150 51 127 Footer Drain- Lot 16 to Lot 19 80 30 76 Footer Drain- Lot 34-35 to Lot 36-37 80 29 71 Pond No. 1 20 30 73 For the conditions in the underdrain and the footer drains,the calculated radius of influence falls within the maximum allowable radius of influence. The underdrain and footer drains should not have an impact on the central wetlands north of Shepard Way or the marked wetlands to the south of Shepard Way. The radius of influence of Pond No. 1 exceeds the maximum allowable radius of influence. Pond No. 1 has the potential to dehydrate the surrounding wetlands. Recommendations It is our opinion that discharge of groundwater from the underdrains and footer drains evaluated in this report will have no impact to the surrounding wetlands. No additional analysis or mitigation is recommended. The analysis shows that a theoretical impact at the southern wetland may occur from Pond No. 1,with a difference in water table of approximately 7.7 feet between the wetland and the outlet. Within expected groundwater gradients, there would be no impact to the pond. We recommend that a standpipe or piezometer be installed at the southern wetland to measure the true water table. If the water table is at least 3 feet below ground surface, no further action is recommended. If the surface of the wetland represents the true water table,monitoring of the wetland will be warranted. If there are impacts to the southern wetland than compensating for the impacts will be required. We understand that provisions for compensating wetland are in place in the event this later scenario requires. Closure This report was prepared for the use of Mr. Robert Urso and the project design team. Our evaluation was based on project information provided to us at the time of this report and may require modification if there are any changes in the nature, design, or location of the proposed project. Mr. Robert Urso Groundwater Evaluation July 9, 2012 Page 4 of 4 Recommendations in this report are based in part on the data obtained from the subsurface explorations. Variations will occur between explorations. Our professional services for this project have been performed in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices; no warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call us at 860.368.5300 if you have any questions or require additional information, recommendations, etc. Sincerely, GEI CONSULTANTS, INC. Frederick W. son, LEP Senior Vice President c: Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals Inc. Attachments: Underdrain Calculations Footer Drain Calculations Pond No. 1 Calculations References Mall h:\wproc\project\urso\nutmegvillage\ground water report.docx Client: DPI Prepared:S.Wilbur Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7/9/2012 G 1''` I CON/ Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.Adinolfi E t ornuharl. Date: 7/9/�012 Underdrain Calculation Pumose: The purpose of this calculation is to determine the radius of influence for underdrain under Shepard Way in the proposed subdivision Nutmeg Tillage, in South Windsor, Connecticut. The road is near a designated wetland buffer area and there is concern that the underdrain could influence the water elevations in the wetland area. Method: The radius of influence can be calculated in a variety of ways. It was difficult to find one method that directly applied to the situation at Shepard way. However, for the purposes of this analysis, we found and used methods for similar drain types and applications. The first method is from a Federal Highway Administration publication for drainage blankets. A drainage blanket is similar to the footer drain because it is a passive system. The second method is an empirical formula used to determine the approximate radius of influence for a pumped well. The drainage features near Shepard Way are passive systems that will not be pumped. Pumping a system may increase the drawdown and the radius of influence. The radius of influence found through this method is an extremely conservative, high-end estimate. References: 1. Federal Highway Administration, Highway Subrainage Design, No. HFWA TS-80-224, July 1990. 2. Powers, J.M., Construction Dewatering:A Guide to Theory and Practice, John Wiley &Sons,1981. 3. Design Professionals, Inc., Shepard Way Plan &Profile, Drawing PP-4, June 16, 2012. 4. Design Professionals, Inc., Details, CD-6, July 6, 2012. Calculation 1: Length of Influence of a Drainage Blanket STEP 1: Calculate the length of influence for a gravity drained drainage blanket using Reference 1 (p. 66). hi = approximate elevation of water table at drain (Reference 4) h2 = lowest invert of drain (Reference 3) Ah =vertical distance between the existing ground water table and the depressed groundwater table Li =the length of influence (ft) h 1 := 67.4ft h2 := 54ft Oh := h1 — h2 = 13.4ft Li := 3.8•(Oh) Li = 50.9ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence RniaX the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the closest distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax 150ft (Occurs at Sta. 2+00) Li = 50.9ft Rmax ' Li Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. �.f j ' Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur tom ' Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7 9 2012 O Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.A inolfi Date: 7/9/Z012 c nn;uhast�. Calculation 2: Calculate the Radius of Influence as an Empirical Function of Drawdown STEP 1: Calculate the the radius of influence as an empirical function of drawdown (Reference 4, p. 109). Ro=Radius of influence as a function of drawdown k = Permeability of the surrounding soil in microns/second. k := 10 1 Ro := 3.Oh•(k)2 = 127.1ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence RM,X the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the maximum distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax = 150.0 ft Ro = 127.1 ft Rmax ' Ro Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. Client: DPI Prepared:S.Wilbur Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7/9/2012 Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.Adinolfi GO fn�..;,,1 Yin,k Date: 7/9/2012 Footer Drain Calculation - Lot 16 to Lot 19 Pumose: The purpose of this calculation is to determine the radius of influence for footer drains around Shepard Way in the proposed subdivision Nutmeg Tillage, in South Windsor, Connecticut. The road is near a designated wetland buffer area and there is concern that the subdrain could influence the water elevations in the wetland area. Method: The radius of influence can be calculated in a variety of ways. It was difficult to find one method that directly applied to the situation at Shepard way. However, for purposes of this analysis, we found and used methods for similar drain types and applications. The first method is from a Federal Highway Administration publication for drainage blankets. A drainage blanket is similar to the footer drain because it is a passive system. The second method is an empirical formula used to determine the approximate radius of influence for a pumped well. The drainage features near Shepard Way are passive systems that will not be pumped. Pumping a system may increase the drawdown and the radius of influence. The radius of influence found through this method is an extremely conservative, high-end estimate. References: 1. Federal Highway Administration, _Highway Subrainage Design, No. HFWA-TS-80-224, July 1990. 2. Powers, J.M., Construction Dewatering:A Guide to Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons,1981. 3. Design Professionals, Inc., Shepard Way Plan & Profile, Drawing PP-4, June 16, 2012. 4. Design Professionals, Inc., Details, CD-6, July 6, 2012. Calculation 1: Length of Influence of a Drainage Blanket STEP 1: Calculate the length of influence for a gravity drained drainage blanket using Reference 1 (p. 66). hi = approximate elevation of water table at drain (Reference 4) h2 = lowest invert of drain (Reference 3) Ah =vertical distance between the existing ground water table and the depressed groundwater table Li =the length of influence (ft) h 1 := 67.4ft h2 := 59.4ft Oh := h1 — h2 = 8.Oft Li := 3.8•(Oh) Li = 30.4ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence RniaX the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the minimum distance between the footing drain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax 80ft (occurs behind Lot 17) Li = 30.4ft Rmax ' Li Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. ;w .. Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur Project: Nutmeg Village Date:G I F- Project No.: 092900 Checked: no 1 E t ,��' Date: 7/9/2012 Calculation 2: Calculate the Radius of Influence as an Empirical Function of Drawdown STEP 1: Calculate the the radius of influence as an empirical function of drawdown (Reference 4, p. 109). Ro=Radius of influence as a function of drawdown k = Permeability of the surrounding soil in microns/second. k := 10 1 Ro := 3.Oh•(k)2 = 75.9ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence Rr,X the maximum radius of influence, or the maximum allowable distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax = 80.0 ft Ro = 75.9 ft Rmax ' Ro Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. { Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur h` Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7/9/2012 s Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.Adinolfi GE1 4 r,,it t,, Date: 7/9/2012 Footer Drain Calculation - Lot 34-35 to Lot 36-37 Pumose: The purpose of this calculation is to determine the radius of influence for footer drains around Shepard Way in the proposed subdivision Nutmeg Village, in South Windsor, Connecticut. The road is near a designated wetland buffer area and there is concern that the footer drains could influence the water elevations in the wetland area. Method: The radius of influence can be calculated in a variety of ways. It was difficult to find one method that directly applied to the situation at Shepard way. However, for purposes of this analysis, we found and used methods for similar drain types and applications. The first method is from a Federal Highway Administration publication for drainage blankets. A drainage blanket is similar to the footer drain because it is a passive system. The second method is an empirical formula used to determine the approximate radius of influence for a pumped well. The drainage features near Shepard Way are passive systems that will not be pumped. Pumping a system may increase the drawdown and the radius of influence. The radius of influence found through this method is an extremely conservative, high-end estimate. References: 1. Federal Highway Administration, Highway Subrainage Design, No. HFWA-TS-80-224, July 1990. 2. Powers, J.M., Construction Dewatering:A Guide to Theory and Practice, John Wiley &Sons,1981. 3. Design Professionals, Inc., Shepard Way Plan & Profile, Drawing PP-4, June 16, 2012. 4. Design Professionals, Inc., Details, CD-6, July 6, 2012. Calculation 1: Length of Influence of a Drainaae Blanket STEP 1: Calculate the length of influence for a gravity drained drainage blanket using Reference 1 (p. 66). h, = approximate elevation of water table in central wetland (Reference 4) h2 = lowest invert of drain (Reference 3) Ah =vertical distance between the existing ground water table and the depressed groundwater table Li = length of influence (ft) h 1 := 70ft h2 := 62.5ft Oh := h1 — h2 = 7.5ft Li := 3.8•(Oh) Li = 28.5ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence RmaX the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the minimum distance between the footing drain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax 80ft (Occurs between Lot 35 and Lot 36) Li = 28.5ft Rmax ' Li Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur L*u Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7/9/2012 Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.AdinolfiGEI c � , Date: 7/9/2012 Calculation 2: Calculate the Radius of Influence as an Empirical Function of Drawdown STEP 1: Calculate the the radius of influence as an empirical function of drawdown (Reference 4, p. 109). Ro=Radius of influence as a function of drawdown k = Permeability of the surrounding soil in microns/second. k := 10 1 Ro := 3.Oh•(k)2 = 71.2ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence RrnaX the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the maximum distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax = 80.0 ft Ro = 71.2 ft Rmax ' Ro Therefore, the marked wetland area is outside of the radius of influence. Rl� � 7/9/2012 kg ' Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur V T, Project: Nutmeg Village Date: Project No.: 092900 Checked: A.Adinolfl Date: 7/9/2012 GEIC'n n�,ulta^t�: Pond No. 1 Calculation Purpose: The purpose of this calculation is to determine the radius of influence for Pond No. 1 located south of Shepard Way in the proposed subdivision Nutmeg Village, in South Windsor, Connecticut. The pond serves as a drainage basin is near a designated wetland buffer area and there is concern that the underdrain could influence the water elevations in the wetland area. Method: The radius of influence can be calculated in a variety of ways. It was difficult to find one method that directly applied to the situation at Shepard way. However, for purposes of this analysis,We found and used methods for similar drain types and applications. The first method is from a Federal Highway Administration publication for drainage blankets. The second method is an empirical formula used to determine the approximate radius of influence for a pumped well. The drainage features near Shepard Way are passive systems that will not be pumped. Pumping a system may increase the drawdown and the radius of influence. The radius of influence found through this method is an extremely conservative, high-end estimate. References: 1. Federal Highway Administration, Highway Subrainage Design, No. HFWA-TS-80-224, July 1990. 2. Powers, J.M., Construction Dewatering:A Guide to Theory and Practice, John Wiley &Sons,1981. 3. Design Professionals, Inc., Shepard Way Plan & Profile, Drawing PP-41 June 16, 2012. 4. Design Professionals, Inc., Details, CD-6, July 6, 2012. Calculation 1: Length of Influence of a Drainage Blanket STEP 1: Calculate the length of influence for a gravity drained drainage blanket using Reference 1 (p. 66). hi = approximate elevation of water table in surrounding wetland (Reference 3) h2 = outlet of drainage basin (Reference 3) Ah =vertical distance between the existing ground water table and the depressed groundwater table Li = length of influence (ft) h 1 := 65.0ft h2 := 57.3ft Oh := h1 — h2 = 7.7ft Li := 3.8•(Oh) Li = 29.3 ft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence Rmaz the maximum allowable radius of influence, or the closest distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax 20ft Li = 29.3 ft Rmax < Li Therefore, the marked wetland area is within of the radius of influence. Client: DPI Prepared: S.Wilbur r's Project: Nutmeg Village Date: 7/9/2012 cked: A.Adinol Project No.: 092900 Chefi GEI Date: 7/9/2012 Calculation 2: Calculate the Radius of Influence as an Empirical Function of Drawdown STEP 1: Calculate the the radius of influence as an empirical function of drawdown (Reference 4, p. 109). Ro=Radius of influence as a function of drawdown k = Permeability of the surrounding soil in microns/second. k := 10 1 Ro := 3.Oh•(k)2 = 73.Oft STEP 2: Compare to maximum allowable radius of influence Rmaz the maximum radius of influence, or the maximum allowable distance between the underdrain and the marked wetland area (Reference 3). Rmax = 20.0 ft Ro = 73.0 ft Rmax < Ro Therefore, the marked wetland area is within of the radius of influence. Reference 1 Cal Publication No. FHWA-TS-80-224 U.S.Department August 1980 of Transportation (Reprinted July 1990) Federal Highway Administration Highway Subdrainage Design / FINE SAND MEOtU n SANDMOARS SgNDEI wa g GRAVEL a ro y !00 t o \s FILTER 90 MATERIAL o' /ro 80 r sn 9�% 70 2 n 4 n Yn Q N Q 80 0. y � q q q q � oP ,o ,o q rq ry q a n F_. E �. o N 40 sn °• s o e°9a L n. MiY L \1 2 qq_ ,'tl Y 4 4 9 `�' rT�7 30 l� 200 GRADED 2 ro h c 80 5 BASES yy 0 on.,'S� 0 3p 2016 !Og _r-� �10 US STANDARD S,EVE SIZE a/.. ti'1.•!%Z;2 q 0 44 o Z 'p7p P n •nj Do FtBure:9. $ 3•. ed l��Y/ro /pf n'nr^o.'e%4. n O)V�• Ded a O;aCaf 1e�S aeo r to A 4'_roYAp roz n 4 y tletl 3d5E3 �ehea4: '/S A !f A i � � .✓ Yg� oo 160. vY70 I 100 so 11J � - �� 20 / e a •e lo /h J ..\�—a—}� A 000��p eaYey footle e �18EIre 33 the trill I'd Sof r 'Pros pe stag C6 j net' tjon it will be necessary to include seepage from this source in designing pavement drainage. Two possible sources of groundwater should be con- sidered: (a) gravity drainage, as shown in Figure 15; and, (b) artesian flow, as illustrated in Figure 22a. For the case of gravity drainage, the average inflow rate, qg, can be estimated by means of a flow net analysis (11) , or by the use of Figure 36, which was prepared to facilitate approximate computations of this type (12,75). In either case, the first step will be the deter- mination of the "radius of influence" or drawdown influence distance, which can be estimated, for practical purposes, by means of the expres- sion (75) Li = 3.8 (H - Ho) , (8) where Li is the influence distance (feet) and (H - Ho) is the amount of drawdown (feet) . See Figure 36. Once the value of Li has been determined, Figure 36 can be used to determine the total quantity of upward flow, q2, into the drainage blanket. The average inflow rate can then be computed from the relation- ship _ q2 qg - 0.5W (9) where qg is the design inflow rate from gravity drainage (cubic feet/ day/square foot of drainage layer), q2 is the total upward flow into one half of the drainage blanket (cubic feet/day/linear foot of road- way), and W is the width of the drainage layer (feet) . Although the solution given in Figure 36 is based upon a symmetrical configuration of gravity flow, very little error is introduced if the flow conditions are not exactly symmetrical because of roadway cross slope, variation in depth of the impervious boundary, etc. Under these conditions, the use of average values of H, Ho and Li in Figure 36 will be satisfactory. Example No. 3 - The Gravity Flow of Groundwater Into a Pavement Drainage Layer. Consider the flow situation shown in Figure 34. The native soil is a silty sand with a measured coefficient of permeability, k, of 0.34 fpd. The average drawdown, determined from Figure 34, is (H - Ho) = (25.0 - 20.0) = 5.0' . Thus, the influence distance can be determined from Equation (8). as Li = 3.8(5) = 19.0' . Entering Figure 36 with (Li + 0.5W)/Ho = (19.0 + 22)/20 = 2.05, and W/Ho = 44/20 = 2.23, it is found that k(H - Ho)/ 2q2 = 0.74. Therefore, q2 - 0.34(5)/2(0.74) = 1.15 cfd/f. Finally, the average inflow rate from the gravity flow of ground- water can be calculated from Equation (9) as qg = g2/0.5W = 1.15/22 = 0.052 cfd/sf. 66 Reference 2 Construction Dewatering A GUIDE TO THEORY AND PRACTICE J. Patrick Powers, P.E. Vice President-Engineering j Moretrench American Corporation 1'! A Wiley-Interscience Publication John Wiley&Sons New York 9 Chichester 9 Brisbane • Toronto 108 Hydrologic Analysis of Dewatering Systems 6.7 Permeability K and Transmissibility T 109 i excavation of length x. The wells are staggered at a distance r,from the sibility,the storage coefficient and the duration of pumping.By adapting the center of the trench. The northward and southward flow from the line Jacob formula(equation 4.5),we can estimate the order of magnitude ofR0, sources at distance L can be approximated from the trench equation 6.9. without recharge as follows: However,equation 6.9 assumes a drainage trench of infinite length. Since ¢ the length of the actual system is finite,the end effects must be considered. Ro=r + Tt C (6.13) This can be done by assuming that at each end of the system,there is a flow equal to one half the flow to a circular well of radius r,.The total flow to the Units to be used in this equation are given in Table 4.2. The value for system may be approximated by adding equations 6.3 and 6.9. pumping time t is selected from schedule or cost considerations regarding x_ _ y the time available to accomplish the result. Q 1r (R lr hz) +2 r xK(He ZI hx)1 (6.12) p The value computed for Ro by equation 6.13 should be adjusted downward o w l J on the basis of judgments as to possible recharge.Equation 6.13 is valid only While the total Q from this model is usually a reliable approximation,it is for confined aquifers,but results obtained for water table aquifers are rea- obvious that the wells at the ends will pump more than those in the center,if j sonable, provided the drawdown H — his not a large percentage of the spacing is constant.In practice,such systems are leapfrogged as the trench i original saturated thickness H. It is apparent from equation 6.11 that Ro 11, computed for a typical confined aquifer(C,=0.001)will be some 14 times excavation continuously progresses, so a given well will at times be any- where in the system.It is good practice therefore to design each well and its greater than that in a typical water table aquifer(C,=0.2),with the same pump for the high capacity it will yield when near the end of the system. 5;, transmissibility,pumped for the same time.Experience confirms that very large values for Ro are typical of confined aquifers. $' An empirical relationship developed by Sichart(43)gives Ro as a function 6.6 Radius of Influence Ro of drawdown H —h and K: Ro=3(H—h)%FK (6.14) The equivalent radius of influence Ro that appears in equations 6.1-6.5 is a mathematical convenience. As discussed in Section 5.3, the sum of the where H—h is in feet and K is in microns per second.Theoretically Ro is recharge to the aquifer is assumed to create an effect similar to that of a independent of drawdown,and is related to pumping time,which does not constant source on a vertical cylindrical surface at Ro.Thus the concept is to appear in the Sichart relationship.Nevertheless,the formula has produced a degree nebulous. Because Ro appears as a log function in equations reasonable values in some situations. 6.1-6.4,precision in estimating it is not necessary.However,the author has In many problems,the source of water is conveniently approximated by a seen Ro vary from 100 to 100,000 ft(30 to 30,000 m)on various projects.The vertical line source at distance L from the center of the system,rather than literature cites instances of even greater magnitude. So the possibility of the vertical cylindrical source at R0.A line source will produce the same flow gross error exists. to a well as a circular source at twice the distance.For use in equilibrium The most reliable means of estimating Ro is by Jacob analysis of a pumping equations 6.1 and 6.3, test,as described in Chapter 8.Only this method will reveal recharge from Ro=2L (6.15) other aquifers,and the degree of connection with surface water bodies.It is necessary also to extrapolate from the conditions existing during the pump- Chapter 9 discusses estimates of the distance L to a line source. ing test to others that may occur within the life of the dewatering system.We have seen the Q of a dewatering system increase by 20,40,or even 100010 during high river stages,particularly when accompanied by inundation of 6.7 Permeability K and Transmissibility T large surface areas(Section 5.3). Lacking a pumping test,it is necessary to make rough approximations of The equilibrium formulas assume an isotropic homogeneous aquifer.When ?' Ro from topography and areal geology, or from estimated aquifer param- transmissibility T is determined by Jacob analysis of a pump test, it is an eters.In an ideal aquifer,without recharge,Ro is a function of the transmis- equivalent isotropic transmissibility Ti,or the transmissibility of an isotropic t Reference 3 MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe,Town Planner From: Jeffrey Doolittle,Town Engineer Date: 5/18/12 RE: Nutmeg Village Plans 05/15/12 Engineering has reviewed the site plans dated May 15, revised to June 15, 2012 for the above application on Pleasant Valley Road and has the following comments: 1. The plans need to be labeled to show pavement width, curb location and type, sidewalk width and material. 2. What is the purpose of the pulloff/tum-around area at the end of Pepin Place? This needs to be labeled and the rectangular box between the sidewalk and road needs to be labeled. 3. There should be a bus shelter at or near Pleasant Valley Road. 4. The clubhouse is shown in Phase 15. This needs to be included in an earlier phase so the clubhouse is completed before 50%of the residential units are done. 5. The proposed sidewalk all along side Pepin Place should be moved away from the road so there is at least a 4 foot snow shelf between them, except across the bridge. This provides a needed separation between pedestrians and vehicles for safety. 6. Sidewalks need to be continuous through driveways per Town Standards. 7. Show a secondary/emergency access drive to South Satellite Road. 8. Except for P.C. and P.T. stations, the horizontal road geometry is not described. Show the curve information, and cul-de-sac geometry. 9. All buildings need to have driveways that are at least 20 feet long between the sidewalk and garage/building so cars do not have to park on the sidewalks. 10. Street lights, street name signs, traffic control signs and stop bars need to be shown. 11. The Town standards call for angle points instead of vertical curves where the algebraic difference in tangent grades is 3% or less. 12. As shown for the first 3 buildings, it does not appear that the sewers are intended to serve the basement levels in this development. 13. Foundation drains and roof leaders are not shown for all buildings. Foundations drains need to be shown with elevations to determine if check valves are needed. I 1 think each building needs its own foundation drain that is tied into an accessible common storm drain in the road or behind the units or daylights in the back. 14. Many of the buildings will need to have sump pumps because the basements are into the high groundwater table. These should be shown on the plans. 15. Only garage floor elevations are show for the multi-unit townhouses. First floor and basement(or slab)elevations should also be shown for use in reviewing sewer connections and foundation drains. 16. The detention basins will be excavated below the estimated high ground water elevations as indicated by the test pit logs and will hold water up to 9' deep below the outlet elevation. The side slopes for basins 1 and 3 scale at 4:1 except at the inlet and the slopes of basin 2 scale at 3:1. These slopes should be noted as the maximum slopes. 17. The trash rack for the detention basin outlet structure with 4"x8" openings will not protect the 3"orifice. A much larger trash rack with much smaller openings is needed, which should be inspected and cleaned on a regular basis. 18. Provide a riprap overflow at the outlet location from detention basin 1 next to the receiving stream so this will still discharge if the trash rack or orifice clogs. 19. The profiles that show all underground utilities need to be checked for conflicts. 20. This site has a high groundwater table and should be raised more to get the buildings, roads and utilities higher and out of the groundwater as much as possible. 21. It appears that the underground utilities will be in the high groundwater table in many places. There should be underdrains along both sides of the roads to collect water and prevent it from degrading the road base and/or following other underground utility trenches and causing problems at low spots. 22. Provide individual sanitary sewer laterals to all units. 23. Provide the estimated sewer flows and velocities used to size the sanitary sewers, pump station and force main. More detail is needed on the pump station, and this must include provisions for emergency back-up power. 24. The stations and offsets for the bridge ends are not shown for orient the bridge with the steam and road. The bridge footing elevations are not shown to match the bridge with the road and stream elevations. A large scale topographic plan and profile should be shown for the bridge. A bridge design will be needed for approval prior to construction. 25. Guard rails need to be shown for the bridge and the bridge approaches. A parapet, railing or fence also needs to be shown for the bridge. 2 s 26. Storm Drainage report comments: a. Why is there an increase in stormwater flow and volume to Pleasant Valley Road? b. What will be the impacts of the increased stormwater volume on the downstream pipes and channels and what is proposed to insure these remain stable? c. We are still reviewing the storm drainage report and will have more questions and comments about this 27. There should be more notes on the plans related to cleaning out the existing pond. For example, how deep will this be made and how will the banks be stabilized and when will this be done? 28. Pleasant Valley Road width scales 26'. Widening this road in front of this development to provide room for bypass areas should be considered. 3 Page 1 of 1 Lipe, Michele From: Peter DeMallie [PDeMallie@designprofessionalsinc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:43 AM To: James.Jurczyk@ct.gov Cc: Andrew Krar; 'Benjamin Wheeler, R.L.A.; Lawrence R.Geissler,Jr., L.S.; Bob Urso; Bond, Richard; Lipe, Michele; Doolittle, Jeffrey; Ralph Alexander, Esq. Subject: Nutmeg Village-STC Letter Recorded Attachments: 2012-04-06 STC recording.pdf Jim -Attached is the STC administrative decision letter for Nutmeg Village,which I recorded in the South Windsor Town Clerk's office(Vol. 2251, Page 0344)on 4/23/2012. Thank you. Peter R. DeMallie President&Principal Design Professionals, Inc. CIVIL&TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS/GIS/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island P.O.Box 1167 860.291.8755 phone 425 Sullivan Avenue 860.291.8757 fax South Windsor,CT 06074 www.desionr)rofessionalsinc.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure or distribution is prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 5/24/2012 PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: 5/23/12 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Chris Dougan, Sherry McGann, Ron Asselin, John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan FROM: Michele Lipe, AICP, Town Planner The Planning &Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 12-28P,Nutmeg Village Special Exception Site Plan and Industrial Resubdivision Northerly side of Pleasant Valley Rd(access proposed), southerly of So Satellite Rd, Location: easterly of Nutmeg Rd ® Site Plan ® Subdivision No. Acres 60+ Zone I and MF-AA ® Industrial ❑ Commercial ® Residential No. Lots/Unit 155 res; 6 s industrial lots Water: ® Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ® Public ❑ Septic System Project Description: Resubdivision(Industrial lots); 155 multi-family units Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑ new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by 6/15/12 and return to the Planning Department. May 23 12 09:55a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.2 • P.O. BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE @S n SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 AS PHONE: 860.291.8755 KWEIV00 S FAX. 860.291.8757 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS I GIS ANALYSTS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 5ervwg Coanectrcut, Massachusetts, $Rhode Island May 21, 2012 Re: Nutmeg Village Inland Wetlands& Watercourses Application Resu.bdivision, Site Plan& Special Exception Application Pleasant Valley Road &South Satellite Road Dear Abutting Property Owner: In accordance with Section 7.3b ofthe"Town of South Windsor Inland Wetlands, Watercourses,and Conservation Regulations",we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property • abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments, however,you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire.For further information regarding the specific date this will heard please contact Jeff Folger,Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer, Planning Department, 860-644- 2511,ext.229. Furthermore, in accordance with regulations of the Planning&Zoning Commission,we are required to notify you that:an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing(s)by the Planning&:Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and/or give comments, however,you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s) prior to the meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact]Michele Lipe,Town Planner,at the South Windsor Planning Department at 64.4-2511, ext. 252. If you have any questions regarding the specifics of the plans,please feel free to contact our office at 860- 291-8755. Thank you. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. w � Benjamin P. Wheeler,RLA Director of Operations Cc: Town of South Windsor Client • Gaj4Dbsl1308}docs\Applica[fons 2012',1308 Abutter Notice 2012-05-21Aoc May 23 12 09:55a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.3 COT m CRECEIPT "D MAIL. RECEIPT ERT - �• r Co • • - • Coverage Ln C * Moi A L L. N Postage a $0.4; 0123 Postage $ $0.45 0123 m Certilied Fee O $2.9.`i 02 m Cer1fred Fee ` .�5 Qy Q Rm eti Recut Fee Postmark p Postmark O (Endorsen>ant Requited) $4.35 Here Return Recelpt Fee Here � O (ErMasrnent Required) $2.35 = Remeliv r (End Rry $0.00 C3 (RndorsementRegr, ) $0.00 r`- Q $5.75 05/21/2012 p Total P,.e....e,x C---- Ct $5.75 05/21/20i2 rq Realty Transfer do Transfer a ssntTc G&R Realty c/o Greenberg, Arnold o Enterprises, Inc. _ � r - ' ' ' "' o 61 South Main Street _------ 140 Progress Drive Manchester, CT 06040 -'-""•- ' - orPoi West Hartford, CT 06107 cr}z s� Posta P. RECEIPTstal erviceTm CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT C ERTIFIE MAIL. m (Domestic • o Provided) ru (Domestic ranly-,NO InSUraMe Coverage Provided) to a Postage $ $0.45 4128 r` r. Postage $ $0.45 0123 m Certi fied Fee `$2.95 �` rrl Certified Fee $2.R5 Oz Return Recut Fee Postmark O Postrnark C3 (Endorsement RaquUed) Q2.35 Here p Return Recelpt Tree Here p (Endorsement Required) $2.35 Rastrlcfad Deliver/Fee Q (Endorsement Required) $0.00 Restricted DaGvery Fee Q (Endorsement RegrrFred) $0.00 0 Total Postage 6 Fees .. $5.?5 05/21/2012 o T,,,,,r o...,+ —R Fax 9: $5.75 05/21/2012 a �tBruce&. Nancy Bantle r-1 s350 Pleasant Valley Road LLC Q gj5;381 Pleasant Valley Road ----------- a _ 1681 Barnum Avenue r` erP(Scuth Windsor, CT 06074 _ r'- Stratford, 01' 06514 — - . - Wl rm ; I t RECEIPT Ln _ LO =- MiiR i ." N Postage $ $0.45 0123 74A L U SE m Certified Fee $?.95 02 1ti Postage $ $0•45 0128 � Pastmadc RetumReceiptFee Here m Certified Fee (Endorsement ReQrked) $2.35 n $�•^� " ReslrietedDeliveryFee O Retum Rerafpt Fee Q" Postmark LD (Endorsement Required) $0.00 a {FsdorsemsrrtRequira() $2.35 Here _ - _ $5.7`r 45/21/2012 Restricted DePvery Fee - Tot-"' --- -- ft (Endorsement RequireM $0.00 r-j senrFrancis & Jeannine'Lacapra o TeWP—tarwfZrti.ac $5•ra 0512112012 o sfra442 Pleasant Valley Road ------------- ary & Corey Fabrycki i`- o---:South Windsor, CT 06074 _- o 61 Hilton Drive City, '' orPcSouth Windsor, CT 06074 May 23 12 09:55a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.4 t - - Co - ET- e _ ,. nfy; Insurance Coverage prov&ed) H to p��9�DSfIFi qT `p°,� U �- • 1R T` J Rid• � 3r � 3@Ti s4 $ $0.45 4128 r` Postage S $o.45 0128 r� rn Cerlined Fee $2.95 0� rn Cenified Fee #L■4 O 0 Postmark Q Return Receipt Fee Postmark O Kelton Retrsipt Fee, Here (Endorsement Rawl G11) r Hera C] (EndoraemerK Regwred) $2.35 C2 ► O Restricted Delivery Fee O Restricted Degvery Fee $0.00 r:- (Endorsement Required) .�� (Endorsement Kayaked) S EM -- $5.75 05/21/2012 a Taal Posraoe Fees $ $5.75 05/21/�012 Q Tot?".�...�_-. a oger& Evelyn Merrill a Anthony &Virginia Sansone ra 1-1 109 Hilton Drive ------------ o �7 Hilton Drive -- --------------- ;pouth Windsor, CT 06074 ------------ r` 06outh Windsor, CT 06074 n - U.S. Postall service rf.! CERTIFI -DRECEIPTU.S. Postal SOrviceirr.. m I (Domestic Maij • Q- tv . iT Q7 A L lu Ln o a AL. USE r— �� a U.45 0128 Pass $0.45 0128 m ceroKed Fee $2.95 02 0 Postmark CertifledFee $2,�5 0.7 O (EndoRisemart Ire $2.35 Here MPostmark Rashk fed Del Fee O Return Racal Fee � W Here n (Endorsement R ulre $0.00 Q (EndorsemeraRequked) $t.�7 eq d� Restricted Delivery Fee (EndorsementAequired) $0.00 a 7otalP.rs+osr-m. $5.75 0S/�1/2012 _I- Tomi Posteae&Fees $5.75 05/21/2012 a sent TH mne Dortiz a o 5&vot 38 Summerwood Lane rq Anthony J. &Marilyn M. Calabrese r- vrpo --' a 3wB5 Day Drive - - c�s;South Windsor, CT 06074 r` �South Windsor,CT 06074 U.S. Postal Sery rViCeT11 CERTIFIED mAILT,-- RECEIPTRECEIPT n .. . �• ru -0 rnru - _ _ Ln Postage sa.�� 0128 Postage $ $0.45 0123 [� M Certified Fee Certified Fee $2.95 02 C1 $2,gg , O Return Aeeelpt Fee Postmark Rt tar a 'T oy Postmark p [Fsdorsament A�r ]Fee $-35 Restricted Deh,,y Fee $ •"`� Here E3 Restrkkled DeKvmy Fee Q (Endorsement Regrdred) �00 (ESdorsemem ti Required) $0.00 I cl S Total Postage&Fees = Tntnr Pnkf—P.97— Q xJ.7J 05/21/2012 M $ $5•75 05/21/201.- s� avid G. &Donna R. Symonds 85 South Sate:Ilite Road LLC la "',d85 South Satellite Road a m 09 Sumerwood Lane - -- r- -,POac �` South Windsor, CT 06074 ---------------- South Windsor, CT 06074 May 23 12 09:56a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.5 MAILT- RECEIPT ,. daw ru MAIL,. RECEIPT �- .. rrl _ r�- Coverage Provided) r` Ln rotor( T o .� ru -hRip rr�°.T�grh� ..� p � ' Postage S r i.11 nJlf:{ .F7 1i�nZ BT�9_4 P-�l n r` $0.4-4 41�8 � Postage $ �0.45 o12s ��rfy,No Insurance CertMied Fee m S2. 42 � Retum Receipt Fee Postmark rn CarTHied Fee $2.95 42 O (Endorsantent Required) $2.35 Hera 0 Retum Receipt Fee Postmark Hera ResMctedOe�aeryFse O (FsdorsementRequlred) i, rj Q Mdo/sementRsquired) $0.00 = Restricted Delivery.Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.00 s rn � Fees $ $5.75 D5/21l2012 x Total FosWa&Fees $ `b i.7 i 05/21/�012 Eric&Kristin Eggleston amela L. Marshalkowski F.- Pleasant Valley Road '� S27 Summerw•ood Lane ------------•- --------------- South c uzdsar CT 06074 !South Windsor, CT 06074 PostalPostal MAIL'CERTIFIED RECEIPT RECEIPT Q f r (1J /• • erage uI f (� ill _ to PostersM.,� 0123 Postage $ $0A 012$ r Certified Fee Certified Fee02 f>7 . t= RetumRecelptFeePoHeresdnadc RetumRece]ptFee 95 02 Postmark p (Endorsement Required) 2. © (Endorsement Required) $2.35 Here O Restr•:xlad DelverY Foe Restricted Delivery Fes (EndorsementRequlrad) $0.00 Q (Endorsement Required) $0.00 o 3 Total Pcstaoe&Fees $ 5.!v 05/21/2012 C3 T. i o ..e e a Q � � �5.75 05l21114012 o speter J. &Mai D. Donahue illiarn J. McTeague ,� ----------- U24 Summerwood Lane 13 Suminerwood Dine --------- � �%outh Windsor, CT 06074 f` outh Windsor, CT 06074 U.S. Postal Oervice,,, CERTIFIEO MAIL,. RECEIPT (Domestic O�iy;no insurance coverage Provided) .-a nj r� Sao— L� T IU . Postage $ $0.45 0128 u7 A . rn CertgiedFee $2.95 02 Postmark u7 • ■ II Return Receipt Fee � Here ru d (EndorsementRequlred) $2.Yj • II Restricted OeMry Fes L-111 ar ' (Endorsemerrt Required) $0.00 � rasa $ .s ,brat Pustaae&Fees $ �5.75 05fZ1/2QiG .45 a r i eIII/ed Fee Q12$ -Paul M. &Jeanne M. Ewing �� o (errdo��er� -95 OL o 5 Summerwaod Lane - -- Q Restricted CV-very F $2.35 P e�ark '` 'South Windsor, CT 06074 ---------------- P_ Fndorsgn Regt tract) O totaJ Pay��,&Fees $0•00 ,� sent risc�ila J 0�121 2012 a A- Wiest � . .e 7 s"21nerwood jr arustee� 4 out vY1nr1� _ ae May 23 12 09:56a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.6 . r . r . r • RECEIPTm • rmacoverage ru - N Ln SOO 60 113Tol ,. sour Postage s $0.4; 0128 PostageR$07,450126 CerMfled Fee Certiped Fee m 12.95 02 Q02 Return Receipt Fee Postmark Return Recept FeePostmark O (ErtdorsementRequlred) $i.35 Here M (EndorsementRequlrede Ft�e O QRestricted DeliveryFee Restrcted DeAvatyFee0 {End trsamertr RegWfedf O (Ernforsement Required)Tolel Postage&Feesrc Total P..er 5.75 05/21/201205/21/2012 can T. Hill ,q -miMchard& Joanne Bouchard o �1 Slm=erwood Lane o g;B�w,42 Swnmerwood Lane South Windsor, CT 06074 -----_M °ll Windsor, CT 06074AYER- . ' all a . r - �• • �� . - n_1 ►f7 ru ra fxTp m ' ri Postage S $0.45 0128 N Pestme S Certltled Fe Faa. $0.45 01LE $2.95 02 M Cortmed Fee � Return Receipt Fee ararkO O (C dorsement Required) $2-35 P Here C7 {Eudprsement Receipt Fee 02 Re Id Delvery Fee Q equtred) Pose Q (EndorsementRequZre GI (>r�orsemerrt rye Hera r M1 $0.00 '? Total $5.75 45;21/2012 a Total Postage&Sees it r9 sear V4Ti11iam & Diane C. Maleskis Warren P. $5.75 05/21/201z C3 :�j35 Summerwood Lane &Elaine$ o �t�l 1 Day Drive r` �,-y°sSouth Windsor, CT 06074 ._'---- `` a South Windsor, _. `----- , CT 06074 --------- rAIL,. RECEIPT1 ,• • rro • e r. a RECEIPT m —• L COM WisrTi-i Coverage Provided) postage s $0.45 0126 g •� Certified Fee SOO b t t IT AA:, US t,� rr, $2.95 02 C 3 Return Receipt Fee Postmark a Postage $ $0.45 0128 O (EndoreementRequlred) $2.35 Here Certitled Fee �+ c 7 Restricted Delivery Fee IT1 1.2.95 0t Postmark p (Endorsement Requked) $0.00 Q Return Receipt Fee r Here r` Q (Endorsement Required) $2.3J To ae ees n , 3 ' u° 1 iruisar-v1e P''Lo. �O1/ l2012 Restricted Delivery Fee C3 (EndorsernontRequSred) $0.00 $6"A&P Coat Apron & Linen r� 161 S. Mac u ---- - -- Total Postage&Fees Z.75 05/2112012 M o n q eston Parkway o d o Mount Vernon,'N 10550 --------- Adeline P_Urso r"I it-I T-t— T-N-;e.n May 23 12 09:56a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 p.7 • r RECEIPT N -D MAIL,. RECEIPT Provided)r-qi, • nly No Insurance Coverage provided) Ul • m 1 • ma rq said r L Postage $ �0,45 0123 m Car"ed Fee $0 Postage S $0.45 0128 O Rot, Receipt Fes Postmark 711 CerunedFes $2.`35 02 © {Fsdotsem fieyu,red) $2.35 Hare f= Retum tieoelpi Foe Postmark O Restricted DsovaryFee 0 (Endorsement Requtrod) $2.35 re (EndorsemaruRequkaa) $Q.Ot� C3 nd'dc'oa 61' wFee o (E q $0.00 s r o.,.�—R r,—. � } i��/5 O $S-75 Q5!',f/2012 Tr.rs,l P—t—R Fwnr. $5.75 05/2112012 r=i Anthony& Anne Hoffman o s77 Sharon Drive _ � 6Susan D. Prusaczyk r` South Windsor, CT 06074 o sr34 Sununeiwood Lane ----------- r` South Windsor, CT 06074 U.S. Postal Servicel,1.1, a Postal CERTIFIED o •• No Jr.surance Covera�ae provided) CERTIFIED MAIL.,, RECEIPT r� m _ (DomesticOnly, S 1 1►1 iTQill A � �M ti _ :ras -�, ff-qPostage s $0.45 012$ 1+� � ,�"1�=# s� m eertuted Fee $2.9� a Postage $ #0.45 0129 0` were Codified Fee $2.95 02 Posz<n�c d Retum Roc Postmark Q (Endpsementfinitfred} � � 1� $`.3L7 Q Retum Rocelpt Fee Hare ResiriciedDenveryFee CI (EnctoreenrerrLRequked) �, O (EWOrsemant Required) $0.00 Q Rest ted Delivery Fee ' nisi Dosage&Fees $ 5 r Q (Endorsement Required) $0.00 a $5.75 45121/201, N �- Tr— ,__.___. --- da $5.75 05/21/2012 72 -Global Turbine Component Techno LLC o W25 South Satellite Road OGRE Tri-State Properties LLC South Windsor, CT 06074 0hP.O. Box 4145 - - --- - ------------ r` fnUtica,NY 13504 CERTIFIED - �ILT,,, RECEIPT U.S. Postal Servi em, e Provided) Ln m �) + U SE ru . r Soo I NDS jT ►&* A USE Ln Postage $ $0.45 0128 a Postage $ $0.45 0128 r`- certttiad roe $2.95 02 Postmark r Nana Codified Fee $2.45 02 p Rawm RecetPt�e $y.35 M Postmark O (EindersementRequtred) r-3 Retrxn Receipt Fee Here c7 (Endersemera Required) $2.35 O �aor`s�ande°na�Fee $0.00 Q RestdctedDeliveryFee (Erworsement Required) $0.00 $5.75 05/?1d20I O Total PoffiaGO&Few ' � Total Postarae&Fees $ S5.75 05/21/2012 d& Avis Pelletier o Leonar Roger A. &Esther J. LaVoie r-1 1°r 31 Hilton Dave _- 0 30 Summerwood Lane - ar n r'indsor, CT 06074 r`Isnjith Windsor. CT 06074 May 23 12 09:56a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 P.8 - . 94 ■, • D MAIL,, RECEIPT -17 O • fu , ,� vc „ ru _ UQ, � S ��! &N•i_ ka.. rtr.3 Lev 17• Postage i $0.45 0128 postage s $0.45 0128 M Cetti/fad Fee CenNled Fee Q $2.� 02 m $2.95 02 Return Receipt Fee t O (EndorsementRequfred Postmark Q 0 ) $2.35 Here Return Aecelpt F� P Here k Restricted Dail very Fee d (Endars . t g:lr ad c Here .35 (Endorsement Raqulred) $0.00 C3 (Endorsement IRoqulred) $0.00 Total FnFtanw R $5.7; 1 5/21/20I� -1- Total Postano&Fees qi $5.7; 05ls'.I/2012 'Mario J. &A-UgeIa D. Vi a 31 8 gnone "`RudoIph E. & Joan B. Capello � orPo ummerwood Lane __-- _ N Summerwood Lane -____.-_ �;sSouth Windsor, CT 06074U.S. Postal Service,N1 South Windsor, CT 06U74 __._.___._. RIF ` • ru .01 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only,No#wurancecoverage o Provided) Lr) For delivery Information visit'!our website at w-w-w__AjS_P_$_.CO_MO s ER i° t a �3 [�- Fos'age S $0.45 0128 PO�se $ $0.45 0123 m ce<clr�ed Fee rn COMM Fee $2.95 02 Q $2.93 02 4*4 FeePostmark 0 Reaum RecelPt Fee O (EndReturn semmen Req�ed) $2.35 Here d (Endorsement Required) $2.35 A�k O Reslcted Delivery Foe � Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorse (Endorsr3rnent Regrdretl) s0.aa it ment Requirer!) $0.00 S U.v�^7f/2012 v T- --- -- $5.75 05/21/2012 , � AHS Realr--, $S, 51 Realty Transfer c/o Transfer .� ty r LLC o Enterprises, Inc. o 065 Delaven Drive -------------- R Delray Beach, FL n- a'140 Progress Drive 33483 "'-'-'--- a Manchester, CT 06040 Postal U.S. Postal CERTIFIED M,ML," RECEIPT ry CERTIFIED Service,1 - - .tea • ' ru (Domestic M-711 Only,No Insurance Coverage Provided) -a �I 7 N G71 AL U s 50 ��N � Of Pastase $ $0.45 0122 r` Postage $ $0.45 0128 m carded Fee $2.95 02 Postmark © C-twod Fee Q.95 02 t3 Retum Receipt Fee Here El Retum Receipt Fee Postmark [� (Endarsontont Roq*ed) $�. 5 M (Endorsement Required) $2.35 Here Restric ed DeRvary Fee $0.00 D Restricted Del very Fae C3 (Endorsement Required) [Endorsement Required) $0.00 �- o 05121/2012 Tr•- «ae, ��. � $5.75 05/21/2012 Louis& Katherine Blanco r.q srAlicia Bawer 376 Pleasant Valley Road _____________________ 0 389 Pleasant Valley Road _ rSouth Windsor, CT 06074 -- .South Windsor, CT 06074 May 23 12 09:57a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 P.9 111 Service,,, MY M MAIL. RECEIPT �nPIT - Ln s SOt �pD T CA . SDI 4 idll T r� Postage 5 •45 Q1 r`, Postage $ :0.45 0128 wed Fee $2.95 02 Postmark M Certifled Free M n fl Here 0 Return Receipt Fee Postmark p Return{;ecelpt Fee $2.3J g (Endorsement Required) $`�3J Here p (Endorsement RequlteA Residcted Delivery Fee $0.00 C3 Restricted Delivery Fee C7 Edorsement RegAred) r%- (Fltdorsement RequiM d) $0-.00 ram- 5 05/21<2f012 s S .f. } [3 Tows a.,�ra o a.ae. @ $5.75 OS/L1l2012 p Total PoetaW&Fees �+ 7J• J Wichael & Ursula Giroux ,� ,Michelle & Rohan Taylor r a _-.438 Pleasant Valley Road _ ______ o .53 Hilton Drive r,- oSouth Windsor, CT 06Q74 -_---------- �`�Sou#h Windsor, CT 06074 - ------------ . Vervicen, - . D- ' RECEIPT n . .- ` tl ,, r`- (Domestic • r- _ :!on visit.IT ur website at VAM.UsPS.COMa--� � r. Postage $ $0.45 4128 r� Postage S :0.45 0128 m carured Fee $2.95 02 Fri Certified Fes $2.95 02 C3 Postmark O Retum Receipt Fee C Postmark O Return Receipt Fee O (Erdwr sarrrent Regerlrec) M2.35 ore p (EndorsementRoWired) $2.35 Here p Fiestrlc:ed Delivery Fee 0 Restricted Delivery Fee ►�- (Endorsement Required) $0.00 (Endorsement Required) $0.00 T.enf oncr�na rz�— 9; $5.75 05/21y2012 p � TaFal Rn-tIAM&Fees $5.75 o5/"zi12012 obert Link, Jr. ra ,.-, onald & Catherine Padegimas o 79 Hilton Drive ....... o __ 101 Hilton Drive ___ .__.. 3outh Windsor, CT 06074 mouth Windsor, CT 06074 - - ---__----- iviceTM rn dry- • - VIAILT. RECEIPT.. -No Insurance CovigraV Provided) • ,n s€� ►�, T qDfi 11T Q79 A L U S E7 L U 7-S Posfx o $ g $0.45 012E (�� Postage S $0.45 0128 m Certified Fes C3 $2.95 ,, m Certified Fee ��5 0. C3 � " Apt Fee"dO ,iretl rrla 0� Poslrk C3 Return Receipt Fee r Postmark O Restricted Delivery Fes $2.3`f Here p (Endorsement Required) $, t.3ti• tEndorsemanl Regelred) Restricted Velvety Fee (Endorsement Require[* $0.00 1� Trnsr w..r—e a.eu.. rr � 5.75 0 121/2012 p Tcr a Postage&Fees $ S5.75 05/21/2012 �Zobert Oiivieri rl ._f 87 South Satellite Road Linda Convertinc) mouth Windsor, CT 08074 _ o .'5 Sharon Drive -------•-•-•-- __-� n- oouth Windsor, CT 06074 May 23 12 09:57a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 P.10 - . - w . L RECEIPT rU ru r. r. • rumestic Mail o*,No insurance coverage Provideto N Ln u1 _ « 011 i iI38$RT t0i .� TQITl, 7°!6►? 4 `. �� .:.ir ram- Postage 8 $0.45 0128 t` Postage 11.4 i 4128 drrad Fee rn Certified Fee $2.95 02 m cer `F2.95 0c C] Postmark fl Postmark C] Rewm Recept Fee r Here fl Rearm Receipt Fee 2.3J Here O (Endorsement Requt ed) $7�• C] (Endorsement Requied) O Restricted Dellve Fee p Elestr Delivery Fee $0.00e00 ^J. $4.04 (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Re4.rred) d`_ V5.75 05121/=2 J- V5.75 05/c1l�4i� O TN ._ .. r-q aul Fournier a�renamatt Properties LLC Barstow Lane -------------- E3 373 Pleasant Valley Road s'rTolland, CT 06084 ------------- '` mouth Windsor, CT 06074 c Postal CERTIFIED MAIL-r,., RECEIPT u' Only, rj (Domestic Mail N mn Si1J lf ?TPdIC�iT 44d t �. .' � OT a �- ikNE «� Lj r` Postage $ $0.45 0128 a „W rriCertified O MCertified Fee $2.95 0` PostmarkPostage t 10.45 0128 Fae C7 Repxn Recelpi Fee e M �•95 02 Ct (Endorsement Required) `.�?.35 - (mod= RepttZ Postmark O Restricted Delivery Fee $2.35 Here (Erxdorsamenl Required) $0.00 Q RestricteQ Delivery Fee l �}C / ` M1 (Erworsemeet Required) $0.00 T....a n-..... a�...... �` iv./,i QJ/G1t�012 - S r-:1 9 South Satellite Road LLC E DLZn s' 7' 05/21/:?012 o -'-29 South Satellite Road - - -- '� Qrive aouth Windsor, CT 06074 Qc. --------— dsor, GT 06074 Mimr r r 4L--LMT'jAIL,. RECEIPT ru r• / r� .. / , r N mn A IT 7- s 7 L S. Postage $0.45 0126 ram` Postage s $0.45 Din MCerMed Fee rTl Certified Fee r o $2.95 n $2.95 42 Return Receipt Fee 02 tZI Retum Recept Fee Postmark O (Endarsemer t Required) $2Y 35 Postmark p (Endorsement Requve[1) $2.35 Hare q Resulcfed Delivery Fee Here Restricted Delivery Fee �n�m mRequired) $0.00 (EndorsementRequlred) 0,00 $5.75 5 Q Total Postam&Fear :5.75 0512112012 � Douglas S Janet M Randall � /`a LEI` To Mary Anne Novak 0 370 Pleasant Valle o r ,;;413 Pleasant Valley Road --------- South Windsor, CTy Road _._._.________ r` o�PoeSouth Windsor, CT 06074 06074 �tr s� - May 23 12 09:57a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 PA ,,U.S. Postal Service4 • - - m CERTIFIED lrbi m . - trt rIu '' ' Lr] For. .atfon .� varage Provided) Ln WITH US Postage $ $0.45 0128 rR ' A L r el m Cer4Ged Fee $2.95 02 Postage $ a.45 o12e a Postmark m Certified Fee n qF p Return Receipt Fear...! 02 0 (EndorsententRequlred) $2„35 Here RetumReceptFoe Postmark Restricted Delivery Fee d (Endorsement Requ'ued) $2.35 Here (Endorsement Required) 'bQ.00 Restricted Delivery Fes (Endorsement Required) $0.Q0 pTotal Postage&Fees �` $5.75 05/2112012 Total Pc,---n r __ $5.7.cr 05/21/2012 a� se'urnmerwood Homeowners G & L Real ssociation, Inc. _______ SSM71 TO ty LLC -51 Summerwood Lane Q Sfreat,i�68 Nutmeg Road South °r1�outh Windsor CT D6D74 °`PDT South Windsor, CT 06074 City Sial _ r � fti • Postal Ln .. • t r7 -(Domestic Mail only; Provided) r1J LO Tt7 Certified Foe 012$ [ti Postage S 30.45 0128 O 42.95 M Cert-died Fee t2.95 02 Q (Endc Return Recept Fee 02 p Postmark ^W(Required) $2. 5 Posynark p Return Recent Fee n c Here Q ( Uter�very Fee l Here 3 (Endorsement Required) be.3.i quired) .00 Resideted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Requked) $0.00 O Tow P 'x F 5.75 Sf a TetP'Cco-A Fme $5.75 051 21/2012 Velida Picard ter ihard & Carole Fioritap-O. Box 755 C3 --..95 Hilton Drive ----------- °'•South Windsor, CT 06074 0 mouth Windsor, CT 06074 cty ------- --------- ------------- artr . • a o m Wj1Fr-Tj-jT-T-Jfr4Ma9ffo Insurance Coverage ProWded) Lr) w Postage $0.45 0128 M certlred Fee $2.95 02 0 Postmark 0 Return Receipt Fee .}ti Here 17 (Endorsement Required) $2.35 Restricted DeFvery Fee (Endorsement Required) 10.00 t3 Total Pogrom R FAAA A $5.75 05/21/2012 a serr To Jptimus South Windsor LLC C3 _____._J 61 South Sateliite Road r` "r o'oouth Windsor, CT 06074 -------- -------- crgc srs May 23 12 09:55a Design Professionals, Inc 860-291-8757 P.1 P.O_BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOU77i WINDSM CT 06074 esign PHONE 860291.8755 FAX: 860.291.8757 rofesslonals www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS !SURVEYORS I GIS ANALYSTS. ! LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connect7cuE; Massachusetts, Rhode"51and • • FAX To: Michele Lipe From: Anne E)eMallie Fax: 860 644-7280 Pages: 11 Phone: 860 644-2511 Date: 5/23/12 Re: Nutmeg Village Certified Mail Receipts DPI Project: 1308 El Urgent ❑ For Review El Please Comment ❑Please Reply • Comments: Certified Mail Receipts for the notification letters to abutters for the 5.21.12 application follow. A p pp copy of the nofice is included as well. P.O. BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 Amok PHONE: 860.291.8755 � s FAX: 8onalsi ..com www.desig n professionalsi nc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode/s/and ABUTTERS LIST Application of Horseshoe Lane Associates,LLC Pleasant Valley Road/South Satellite Road DPI Project No.:1308 • May 21,2012 : Map Parcel Owner Mailing Address aty State Zip * 33 12 Realty Transfer c/o 140 Progress Drive Manchester CT 06040 • Transfer Enterprises, • Inc. 33 13 Realty Transfer c% 140 Progress Drive Manchester CT 06040 • Transfer Enterprises, Inc. : * 33 14 350 Pleasant Valley 1681 Bamum Stratford CT 06514 Road LLC Avenue * 33 16 Douglas S&Janet M 370 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 • Randall Road : * 33 17 Louis&Katherine 376 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Blanco Road * 33 18 Eric&Kristin Eggleston 388 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 6074 Road • 33 21 Mary Anne Novak 413 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Road 33 22 Alicia Baver 389 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Road • 33 23 Bruce&Nancy Bantle 381 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Road 33 24 Paul Fournier 373 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Road • * 34 1 Michelle&Rohan 438 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Taylor Road : 34 2 Francis&Jeannine 442 Pleasant Valley South Windsor CT 06074 Laca ra Road • 34 5 Leonard&Avis Pelletier 31 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 6074 : * 34 6 Dora Reis 43 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 * 34 7 Michael&Ursula Giroux 53 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 * 34 8 Mary&Corey Fabrycki 61 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 * 34 9 Nelida Picard P.O.Box 755 South Windsor CT 06074 • * 34 10 Robert Link,Jr. 79 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 : * 34 11 Anthony&Virginia 87 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 : Sansone * 34 12 Richard&Carole Fiorita 95 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 * 34 13 Donald&Catherine 101 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 • Padegimas * 34 14 Roger&Evelyn Merrill 109 Hilton Drive South Windsor CT 06074 : * 34 33 Linda Convertino 75 Sharon Drive South Windsor CT 06074 #* 34 22A Summerwood 51 Summerwood South Windsor CT 06074 • Homeowners Lane Association,Inc. : 34 22A LAVOIE ROGER A& 30 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 ESTHERJ LANE • 34 22A CAPELLO RUDOLPH E 50 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 &JOAN B LANE 34 22A VIGNONE MARIO J& 31 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 ANGELA D LANE • 34 22A PRUSACZYK SUSAN B 34 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 : LANE : G:\jobs\1308\docs\Applications 2012\1308 Abutters list 2012-05-21.doc . 34 22A URSO ADELINE P 17 DAY DRIVE South Windsor CT 06074 34 22A MALESKIS WILLIAM& 35 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 • DIANE C LN 34 22A BRINK WARREN P& 11 DAY DRIVE South Windsor CT 06074 ELAINE M 34 22A DORTIZ HANNE 38 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 • LANE 34 22A CALABRESE 5 DAY DRIVE South Windsor CT 06074 ANTHONY J& MARILYN M • 34 22A SYMONDS DAVID C& P O BOX 1331 South Windsor CT 06074 DONNA R 34 22A BOUCHARD RICHARD 42 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 &JOANNE LANE 34 22A Donahue,Peter J.& 24 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 • Mai D. LANE 34 22A McTeague,William 43 Summerwood South Windsor CT 06074 • Lane 34 22A EWING PAUL M& 25 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 • JEANNE M LANE 34 22A WEST PRISCILLA A 47 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 TRUSTEE LANE 34 22A Marshalkowski,Pamela 27 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 • L. LANE 34 22A HILL JEAN T 51 SUMMERWOOD South Windsor CT 06074 LANE * 46 20 AHS Realty I,LLC 1065 Delaven Drive Delray Beach FL 33483 • * 46 21 G&R Realty cfo 61 South Main Street West Hartford CT 06107 Greenberg,Arnold * 46 22 G&L Realty LLC 68 Nutmeg Road South Windsor CT 06074 South • 47 112 Optimus South Windsor 161 South Satellite South Windsor CT 06074 LLC Road 47 113 Brenamatt Properties 171 Barstow Lane Tolland CT 06084 LLC • 47 114 Robert Olivieri 187 South Satellite South Windsor CT 06074 Road 47 115 GRE Tri-State PO Box 4145 Utica NY 13504 Properties,LLC * 47 116 229 South Satellite 229 South Satellite South Windsor CT 06074 • Road LLC Road * 47 122 Anthony&Anne 77 Sharon Drive South Windsor CT 06074 Hoffman 47 124 South Windsor Merger 161 S.MacQuesten Mount Vernon NY 10550 • Company LLC;A&P Parkway Coat Apron&Linen 47 125 Global Turbine 125 South Satellite South Windsor CT 06074 Component Technol Road • LLC 47 126 85 South Satellite Road 85 South Satellite South Windsor CT 06074 LLC Road • '-Direct Abutter #-Certified Letters will be mailed to all unit owners within development P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH w1NDSOP,Cr 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 IN th FAX:860.291.8757 SS101i1��S 25 Anniversary 1986-2011 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS / GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode/s/and • • • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Michele Lipe Date: 5/21/2012 DPI Project No. 1308 Town Planner Re: Nutmeg Village Town of South Windsor Resubdivision/Site Plan/Special Exception Application 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Renderings ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change Order ❑ • COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Planning&Zoning Application 1 5/14/12 1128 Horseshoe Lane Assoc. LLC application fee(residential portion)$885.00 1 5114/12 1267 M.G. Realty application fee(industrial portion)$510.00 3 5/21/12 sets of plans,including architecturals 15 Site Plan Narrative 1 Legal Description of Special Exception area • These are transmitted as checked below: ® ForApproval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval • ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and Submit ❑ Return corrected prints ® For review and comment ❑ Forbids due ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: also included: -15 copies of State Traffic Commission Administrative Decision dated April 16,2012 -Direct Abutter List -Direct Abutter Letter • previously submitted items hereby referenced and included with this application: -2 copies of Storm Drainage report(submitted with IWA/CC application 5/15/12) -Traffic Impact Report(submitted with Zone Change/General Plan application 12/12/11) -Planning Report-Fiscal Impacts of Residential Development(submitted with Zo application 1/18/12) MAy120712 • SOUTH WIND60R PLANNING DEPT. • SIGNED: CC: Benja m P.Wheeler,RLA,Director of Operations NUTMEG VILLAGE PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLOT PLAN PREPARED FOR: Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC, Date: 05/15/12 Revisions: 05/21/12 scale 1"=40' Sheets CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-4 & CP-5 prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. Beginning at a point on the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road as depicted on the above referenced plans, said point being the south westerly corner of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, and also being the south easterly corner of"Lot B" herein described; Thence N73°27' 24"W along the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road, 203.55 feet to a point; Thence N27°22' 01"E along the easterly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 280.42 feet to a point; Thence N73°25' 09"W along the northerly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 209.25 feet to a point; Thence N27° 18' 51"E along the easterly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 432.92 feet to a point; Thence N53° 02' 34"W along the northerly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 360.04 feet to a concrete monument; Thence N15'30' 43"E along the easterly property lines of N/F Realty Transfer, LLC, N/F Mastransit, LLC, &N/F G&R Realty in party by each, 707.74 feet to a point on the southerly property line of land N/F AHS Realty I, LLC; Thence S650 06' 59"E along the southerly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 135.00 feet to a point; Thence N150 30' 43"E along the easterly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 296.25 feet to a point; Thence S65°06' 47"E along the southerly property line of proposed industrial lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in party by each, 1,871.04 feet to a point on the westerly property line of Summerwood Estates, LLC; Thence S38°05' 14"W along the westerly property line of N/F Summerwood Estates, 213.18 feet to a brownstone; Thence S39°30' 29"W along the westerly property lines of N/F Roger Rankin&Evelyn Merrill,N/F Donald J. &Catherine A. Padegimas,N/F Richard A. & Carole T. Fiorita, N/F Anthony J. &Virginia A. Sansone,N/F Robert Link, Jr.,N/F Nelida A. Picard,N/F Corey C. &Mary Fabrycki,N/F Michael &Ursula Giroux,N/F Dora Reis in party by each, 978.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly property corner of Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra; Thence N65° 18' 14"W along the northerly property lines of N/F Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra, and N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 726.50 feet to a brownstone; Thence S34°35' 34"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 454.87 feet to a point; Thence S31°40' 24"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 114.09 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said"Lot B" contains 2,158,289 square feet or 49.547 acres. P.O.BOX 1 167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:8onalsi .8757 c.com www.design professionalsi nc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, *Rhode Island May 21,2012 Re: Nutmeg Village Inland Wetlands&Watercourses Application Resubdivision, Site Plan&Special Exception Application Pleasant Valley Road&South Satellite Road Dear Abutting Property Owner: : In accordance with Section 7.3b of the"Town of South Windsor Inland Wetlands,Watercourses,and Conservation Regulations",we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission.The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments, however,you are not required to attend.You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire.For further information regarding the specific date this will heard please contact Jeff Folger,Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer,Planning Department, 860-644- 2511,ext.229. Furthermore, in accordance with regulations of the Planning&Zoning Commission,we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing(s)by the Planning&Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. : As an abuttingroe owner you are invited to the hearing(s)s to ask questions and/or give comments, P Prt3' y g( ) q g� however,you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact Michele Lipe,Town Planner,at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511,ext.252. If you have any questions regarding the specifics of the plans,please feel free to contact our office at 860- 291-8755. Thank you. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC. :f J Benjamin P.Wheeler,RLA Director of Operations Cc: Town of South Windsor Client • G:\jobs\l308\docs\Applications 201 2\1 308 Abutter Notice 2012-05-21.doc 5X-1 Vie,- South Win • • Planning Department Memo To: Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. From:Michele R. Lipe, Town Planner Date: 6/27/2012 Re: Application #12-28P, Nutmeg Village Special Exception/Site Plan and Industrial Subdivision Planning Department review comments General Comments 1. A secondary means of access for emergency vehicles must be provided to South Satellite Road or Nutmeg Road. 2. Landscaping: A table of landscape material and quantities to be used for each typical building should be provided. 3. What treatment will be used between in the strip between driveways? Is it intended to be planted or some pavers used? 4. Buffer areas • Development must be fully screened on all sides, including open space sides. The 25-foot buffer required must be part of the lot of the development or under the developer's control (via easement). A copy of the easement must be provided for review and approval. • The survey shows that there are numerous encroachments by adjoining property onto the subject site, such as a playscape, shed, lawn areas, and debris dumping. As these encroachments occur within the required buffer area, the applicant will need to reclaim these areas for buffer planting and these items must be shown to be removed from the property. • Buffer must meet 5-year and maturity visibility screening requirements in all buffer areas. Required buffer cross sections have been provided; however there is concern that once development occurs, that additional screening may 1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,CT 06074 PH 860-644-2511,ext.252 Fax 860-644-7280 e-mail michele.lipe(a)southwindsor.orci 0 Page 1 be necessary. Of particular concern are the areas that are adjacent to the industrial lots. Consideration for interplanting and establishment of an evergreen buffer should be considered at this time. 5. Bus shelter must be provided along the Pleasant Valley Road frontage and out of the easement area. 6. The lighting level provided seems low and uneven. There are several spots that will be left as dark spots along the road way. 7. The westerly property boundary has the 25' buffer line incorrectly labeled as a side yard. 8. Any work on trees within the proposed ROW is the responsibility of the developer and must be completed before the town accepts the deed for the ROW. 9. The sidewalk along the curve of the road must be off-site from the road by four feet for safety reasons General notes: Project Phasing - It will be the recommendation of staff that the clubhouse be completed and a certificate of occupancy granted at the time that 50% of the units have received their CO's. Industrial Subdivision Comments Sidewalks - There are no sidewalks shown along the frontage. Subdivision regulations section 4.13.6, Circulation System Design, includes a provision that the Commission may require sidewalks on existing street frontage, depending on pedestrian circulation patterns and existing site conditions. We note that employees do currently work down the street from the bus stop. In general spend a lot more time walking during the day, and will walk in the streets unless an alternative is provided. Staff recommend that sidewalks be installed along the applicant's South Satellite frontage, unless the applicant has an acceptable alternative. Landscaping — Street trees must be provided along the South Satellite frontage in accordance with the subdivision regulations. • Page 2 Folger, Jeffrey From: Liz Pendleton [rpendleton01 @snet.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:58 AM To: Folger, Jeffrey Subject: Nutmeg Village Dear Mr. Folger, Please forward my letter onto the Inland Wetlands Commission Members. I would like to voice my opposition on the approval of Nutmeg Village based on the following: 1. The destruction of the Natural Habitat for many different kinds of Animals, including their shelter, food and water. 2. The pollution of ground water that will drain into the stream and eventually end up in the Podunk River, killing the fish and wildlife that use the river. 3. The detention basins that will harbor more bugs and mosquitoes and are a threat to any children in the area including the families in Pleasant Valley Estates. 4. The stress on the infrastructure...Roads, Schools, Town Services i.e. Fire, Police, Sanitation Noise and increased traffic. 5. Most importantly the DECREASE OF PROPERTY VALUES of the homes in Pleasant Valley Estates! There are plenty of Condos and Townhouses in Town already, we DON'T NEED anymore! This development will ONLY BENEFIT ONE PERSON and not the town, neighbors or business's. 7/17/2012 Page 2of2 PLEASE DON'T APPROVE THIS DEVELOPMENT! Thank - You Elizabeth E. Pendleton 319 Hilton Drive South Windsor, CT 7/17/2012 From: Roger.Emerick@zodiacaerospace.com [ma ilto:Roger.Emerick@zod iacaerospace.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:30 PM To: Gantick, Michael Subject: To SW Water Pollution Control: Comment re: Nutmeg Village To Water Pollution Control Authority: Subject: Propose Nutmeg Village Sirs/Mures: I work in South Windsor, on South Satellite Road. Regarding the proposed Nutmeg Village, which I've read about in the Hartford Courant. 1) 1 have walked the property during wet season. The standing water was red. I believe there is ground water pollution and the land should not be approved for development. 2)(my opinion)You have so many unused 'developed' properties; you should not further destroy undeveloped land. Your Town will not be improved with increased population, and traffic, regardless how it may increase your grand list. Respectfully, Roger Emerick Engineer Pioneer Aerospace 45 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Direct: 860-282-5160 Company: 860-528-0092x260 (Fax: 528-8122) Roger.Emerick@zodiacaerospace.com RECEIVED AUG 13 2012 SOUTH WIND60R PLANNING DEPT. s 10co W N SfA O Tom 07 � C U y � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�dSOR•CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 1570 0000 6337 2904 August 6, 2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC c/o Robert Urso 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Urso : Re: Appl. 12-28P Nutmeg Village Special Exception/Site Plan We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on July 24, 2012 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Special Exception to Section 3.4 and Site Plan of Development for approval of a 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village", on the remaining 49.5 acres, for properties identified as R003 Nutmeg Road, L023 Pleasant Valley Road, 388 Pleasant Valley Road and a portion of 438 Pleasant Valley Road, located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South, I, MF-AA and A-20 zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., project # 1308 and dated July 5, 2012 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including bonds in the amount of$ $20,000 to ensure erosion and sedimentation measures, $25,000 for wetlands mitigation, $50,000 for the construction of stormwater structures. 4. A landscape bond in the amount of$50,000 is required and must be submitted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy if work is not completed. 5. All bonds must be in one of the forms described in the enclosed Bond Policy. 6. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 9.1.3 of the Zoning Regulations. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. This approval does not constitute approval of the sanitary sewer,which can only be granted by the Water Pollution Control Authority. 9. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 11. All free standing signs and/or building signs require the issuance of a sign permit before they are erected. 12. If a State Traffic Commission certificate is required, no building permits will be issued until the certificate has been issued (per CGS §14-311). 13. The clubhouse shall be completed once fifty percent of the units are occupied. 14. The access road shall be completed once seventy-five percent of the units are occupied(prior to the start of Phase 12). 15. The engineering comments dated 5/18/12 shall be incorporated into the final plans. 16. The buffer planting plan is to be reviewed in the field with the applicant's landscape architect and town staff to determine if additional plantings are needed to meet the buffer requirements. 17. The buffer along the easterly property boundary(under the easement) shall include more plantings to meet the buffer requirement. 18. A bike rack shall be provided outside of the community building. 19. An overflow parking area shall be established in the vicinity of the community building. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet CP1- CP5 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations and landscaping plans) must be submitted to this Commission. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely �� c 7W L,L--,'"ry Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission PK/llz cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal I, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission, hereby certify that on July 24, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Robert Urso a Special Exception to Section 3.4 and Site Plan of Development for approval of a 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village", on the remaining 49.5 acres, for properties identified as R003 Nutmeg Road, L023 Pleasant Valley Road, 388 Pleasant Valley Road and a portion of 438 Pleasant Valley Road, located on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road, southerly side of South Satellite Road and easterly of Nutmeg Road South, I, MF-AA and A-20 zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., project # 1308 and dated July 5, 2012 as revised. GIS PIN: #6510R003,#7290L023, #72900388, #72900428 (See attached) OWNERS OF RECORD: M.G. Realty Limited Partnership, J.E. Shepard Co., Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this day of , 2012. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d L Chairman Patrick Kennedy Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of , 2012, at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: SPECIAL EXCEPTION AREA NUTMEG VILLAGE PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLOT PLAN PREPARED FOR: Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC, Date: 05/15/12 Revisions: 06/15/12, 07/06/12, scale 1"=40' Sheets CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-4&CP-5 prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. Being portions of those certain parcels of land on the northerly side of Pleasant Valley Road and the southerly side of South Satellite Road, in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, owned now or formerly by: M.G. Realty Limited Partnership (R003 Nutmeg Road),The J.E. Shepard Company(L023 Pleasant Valley Road),Eric&Kristin R.Eggleston(388 Pleasant Valley Road), and Rohan M. & Michelle D.Taylor(438 Pleasant Valley Road). Being more particularly bounded and described as follows. Beginning at a point on the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road as depicted on the above referenced plans, said point being the south easterly corner of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, and also being the south westerly corner of "Lot B or Special Exception Area"herein described; Thence N27°22' 01"E along the easterly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 280.42 feet to a point; Thence N73°25' 09"W along the northerly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 209.25 feet to a point; Thence N27° 18' 51"E along the easterly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC,432.92 feet to a point; Thence N53°02' 34"W along the northerly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 360.04 feet to a concrete monument; Thence N15°30' 43"E along the easterly property lines of N/F Realty Transfer, LLC, N/F G&L Realty,LLC, &N/F G&R Realty in party by each, 707.74 feet to a point on the southerly property line of land N/F AHS Realty I, LLC; Thence S65°06' 59"E along the southerly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 135.00 feet to a point; Thence N15°30' 43"E along the easterly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 296.25 feet to a point; Thence S65°06' 47E along the southerly property line of proposed industrial lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in party by each, 1,871.04 feet to a point on the westerly property line of Summerwood Homeowners Association, Inc.; Thence S38'05' 14"W along the westerly property line of N/F Summerwood Homeowners Association, Inc.,213.18 feet to a brownstone; Thence S39°30' 29"W along the westerly property lines of N/F Roger Rankin&Evelyn Merrill,N/F Donald J. &Catherine A. Padegimas, N/F Richard A. &Carole T. Fiorita, N/F Anthony J. &Virginia A. Sansone,N/F Robert Link, Jr.,N/F Nelida A. Picard, N/F Corey C. &Mary Fabrycki,N/F Michael &Ursula Giroux,N/F Dora Reis in party by each, 978.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly property corner of Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra; Thence N65° 18' 14"W along the northerly property lines of N/F Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra, and N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor,701.12 feet to a point ; Thence S34°35' 34"W along the easterly 25' buffer line running through the property of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor,458.59 feet to a point; Thence S31°40' 24"W along the easterly 25' buffer line running through the property of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 107.29 feet to a point; Thence N72° 10' 29"W along the northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road 25.75 feet to a point; Thence N73°27' 24"W along the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road, 203.55 feet to the point and place of beginning; Said"Lot B or Special Exception Area"contains 2,172,474 square feet or 49.873 acres. r 'SUPEPCEOED t / C.0 rqICk--.' pV-C-) , �, y, l6-b,k.Pj ��Sc�� P� S p@ C i CL t EV-- c-e p-t4 o-r-) A-re G- NUTMEG VILLAGE PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLOT PLAN PREPARED FOR: Horseshoe Lane Associates, LLC, Date: 05/15/12 Revisions: 05/21/12 scale 1"=40' Sheets CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-4&CP-5 prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. Beginning at a point on the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road as depicted on the above referenced plans, said point being the south westerly corner of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, and also being the south easterly corner of"Lot B" herein described; Thence N73°27' 24"W along the proposed northerly right-of-way line of Pleasant Valley Road, 203.55 feet to a point; Thence N27°22' 01"E along the easterly property line of N/F Eric A. &Kristin R. Eggleston, 280.42 feet to a point; Thence N73°25' 09"W along the northerly property line of N/F Eric A. & Kristin R. Eggleston, 209.25 feet to a point; Thence N27° 18' 51"E along the easterly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 432.92 feet to a point; Thence N53°02' 34"W along the northerly property line of N/F 350 Pleasant Valley Road, LLC, 360.04 feet to a concrete monument; Thence N15°30' 43"E along the easterly property lines of N/F Realty Transfer, LLC, N/F Mastransit, LLC, &N/F G&R Realty in party by each, 707.74 feet to a point on the southerly property line of land N/F AHS Realty 1, LLC; Thence S65°06' 59"E along the southerly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 135.00 feet to a point; Thence N15°30' 43"E along the easterly property line of N/F AHS Realty I, LLC, 296.25 feet to a point; Thence S65°06' 47E along the southerly property line of proposed industrial lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in party by each, 1,871.04 feet to a point on the westerly property line of Summerwood Estates, LLC; Thence S38°05' 14"W along the westerly property line of N/F Summerwood Estates, 213.18 feet to a brownstone; Thence S39° 30' 29"W along the westerly property lines of N/F Roger Rankin&Evelyn Merrill, N/F Donald J. &Catherine A. Padegimas, N/F Richard A. &Carole T. Morita, N/F Anthony J. &Virginia A. Sansone, N/F Robert Link, Jr., N/F Nelida A. Picard, N/F R i Corey C. &Mary Fabrycki, N/F Michael&Ursula Giroux, N/F Dora Reis in party by each, 978.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly property corner of Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra; Thence N65° 18' 14"W along the northerly property lines of N/F Francis C. &Jeanine LaCapra, and N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 726.50 feet to a brownstone; Thence S34° 35' 34"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 454.87 feet to a point; Thence S31°40' 24"W along the westerly property line of N/F Rohan M. &Michelle D. Taylor, 114.09 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said "Lot B"contains 2,158,289 square feet or 49.547 acres. t0W N Se4 a YF 7-0-a� 07s� 2v y � �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 R.co�'� TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 October 22,2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC C/O Robert Urso 18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Urso: Re: Appl.# 12-28P,Nutmeg Village Resubdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 9, 2012 to set a bond in the amount of$96,500 for subdivision improvements associated with the above referenced project. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. Sincerely, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission PK/llz Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. P PAL"-I1 7 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 r'O SS1011��5 25 "'Anniversary 1986-2011 FAX:8onalsi c.com ,7 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/ PLANNERS / SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode Island • • fkfr. Jeffrey Doolittle October 5,2012 Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 • Dear Jeff: Re: Monumentation Installation Resubdivision -N tmeg Village South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj.No. 1308 • Please be advised that our firm has been authorized by Arnold Greenberg and Robert Urso to install all of the monumentation(missing or proposed iron pins and monuments per the approved plan)associated with the above-referenced resubdivision application, and that our survey department will complete said installation on or before October 15, 2012. Thank you. • Sincerely, DESIGN OFESSIONALS,INC. ] By: y Peter R. a allie,President Cc: Jeffrey Folger Michele Lipe Thomas Mitchell,Esq. Ralph Alexander,Esq. Arnold Greenberg • Robert Urso Lawrence Geissler,L.S. RECEIVED Benjamin Wheeler, R.L.A. Andrew Krar, P.E. OCT 05 2012 SOUTH WIND60R PtAWNG DEPT. • Document] BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/30/2012 APPLICANT NAME M.G. Realty Limited Partnership c/o Attorney Ralph Alexander ADDRESS 61 South Main Street West Harford, CT 06107 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT Pleasant Valley Rd/Nutmeg Rd/South Satellite Rd LOT SUBDIVISION Nutmeg Village Resubdivision P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER Appl. 12-28P AMOUNT OF BOND $ 96,500 CHECK NUMBER 1280 DEPARTMENT Planning SUBMITTED BY Lauren Zarambo 10/30/2012 NAME DATE RECEIVED BY FINANCE NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER `j d C� 93 WAPlanning Admin\PZC\Bonds\2012 BondsU2-28P Nutmeg Village Resubdivision Transmittal.doc r -A<0W N S'r - U apslo� V&U&Ot C1 U s � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 OS OR.-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 October 22,2012 Horseshoe Lane Associates LLC C/O Robert Urso -18-3 Arthur Drive South Windsor,CT 06074 Dear Mr. Urso: Re: Appl.# 12-28P,Nutmeg Village Resubdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 9,2012 to set a bond in the amount of$96,500 for subdivision improvements associated with the above referenced project. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. Sincerely, r Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission PK/llz Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Zarambo, Lauren L. From: Ralph Alexander[ralexander@willard-alexander.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 9:59 AM To: Zarambo,Lauren L. Subject: RE: Sub Account Number Lauren: Thank you very much. I would request that the c/o name be Arnold Greenberg at the West Hartford address that you have on the form as that is who is at that address and his attorney is Thomas B. Mitchell, Esquire, McElroy, Deutsch,Mulvaney&Carpenter, LLP, One State Street, Hartford, CT 06103. Once again thank you for your assistance in this matter. Ralph Alexander From: Zarambo, Lauren L. [mailto:Lau ren.Za rambo@southwindsor.org] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 8:58 AM To: 'ralexander@willard-alexander.com' Subject: Sub Account Number Please find attached Bond Transmittal Form which includes the Sub Account Number for Appl. 12-28P, Nutmeg Village Resubdivision. Thank you, Lauren Lauren L Zarambo Planning Department Secretary Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT o6074 86o.644.25u ext 253 11/5/2012 P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULUVAN AVENUE 0-8 • SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 th FAX:860.291.8757 ftofeWOMIS 25 Anniversary 1986-2011 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS/ GIS ANALYSTS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut, Massachusetts, t Rhode Island • w • r Mr.Jeffrey Doolittle October 5, 2012 Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Jeff: Re: Monumentation Installation Resubdivision Nutmeg Village South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj.No. 1308 Please be advised that our firm has been authorized by Arnold Greenberg and Robert Urso to install all of the monumentation(missing or proposed iron pins and monuments per the approved plan)associated with the above-referenced resubdivision application, • and that our survey department will complete said installation on or before October 15, 2012. Thank you. e : Sincerely, • DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC. • • By. X DeMallie,President Cc: Jeffrey Folger Michele Lipe • Thomas Mitchell,Esq. Ralph Alexander,Esq. Arnold Greenberg Robert Urso • Lawrence Geissler,L.S. -- *- - -Benjamin Wheeler,-R.L.A.- - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - -- -- Andrew Krar,P.E. • • s • • r • e • • • • G:\jobs\1308\Correspondence\1308-Monumentation Installation Letter,10-S-12.doc • • tIW N Sf4 7DWf_z, O-P S_0� ?d O a 5 � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR•CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 April 16, 2013 Ben Wheeler, P.E. Design Professionals, Inc. 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Conceptual Approval 155 unit multi-family development, "Nutmeg Village" Dear Mr. Wheeler: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority, at its regular meeting on April 2, 2013, provided conceptual approval for the use of a single lateral for each of the proposed buildings at the proposed 155 unit multi-family development, to be known as "Nutmeg Village". This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1) The main common pipe serving more than one residential unit that connects to the lateral shall equal to or greater than six inches in diameter. 2) Sewer design review and technical approval of the Town of South Windsor Engineering Department. 3) Applicant must return to the Water Pollution ControlAuthority for final approval. Very truly yours, 5ter%ichd Aries, Chairman Pollution Control Authority RA:ead cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Jeff Doolittle, Town Engineer Michele Lipe, Director of Planning Chris Dougan, Chief Building Inspector Robert Urso, Applicant 10*N Sf4 x F� 710v� O-P soa� ?d&U&Ot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 sox-co` TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 July 29,2013 Andrew Krar,P.E. Design Professionals, Inc. 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: WPCA Approval 155 unit multi-family development, "Nutmeg Village" Dear Mr. Krar: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority, at its regular meeting on July 9, 2013, gave approval for connection to the Town's sewerage system for proposed 155 unit multi-family development on Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor, CT and as more specifically shown on plans entitled "Nutmeg Village-A Planned Community, Resubdivision-Site Plan of Development — Special Exception — Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor, CT"; Designed by Design Professionals, South Windsor, CT; Project No.: 1308; Dated 5/15/2012; Pages PP-1 through PP-4 "Plan & Profiles" Revision Dates: 6/15/12, 7/6/12, 5/2/13 and 6/21/13. This approval is contingent upon the following conditions: I. An Association Agreement that defines its responsibility for the maintenance of the pump station through contractor services; and that annual budgets shall set aside funds for this purpose; 2. The satisfactory review and approval by Town staff of the pump station design; 3. Final technical approval of the Town of South Windsor Engineering Department; and 4. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be conditional upon the installed sewer line having been inspected by the Town staff, and upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans approve by the Authority, and meeting all regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, Rich d Aries, Chairman W_ er Pollution Control Authority Richard Aries:ead cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Jeff Doolittle, Town Engineer x/Michele Lipe, Director of Planning Chris Dougan, Chief Building Inspector BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL DATE January 19, 2016 APPLICANT NAME M.G. Realty Limited Partnership 8/8 AtteLaeey Ralph r,_ —d__ ADDRESS 61 South Main Street West Hartford, CT 06107 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT 100 South Satellite Road / Pleasant Valley Road / Nutmeg Road Nutmeg Village Resubdivision P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER Appl. 12-28P MUNIS APPLICATION NUMBER 201200635 SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 500183 ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT $ 96,500. Please Release $ 96,500. Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required work has been completed. _Lauren L Zaram6o January 19, 2016 NAME DATE 0 BY- CHECK # ISSUED DATE tl W:\Planning Admin\PZClBonds\2016 Bondsl12-28 Nutmeg Village Bond Release Trans.doo BOND TRANSMITTAL - DATE: January 19, 2016 APPLICANT NAME DALO, LLC ADDRESS 229 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 07074 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT 100 South Satellite Road SUBDIVISION Nutmeg Village Subdivision P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER 12-28P AMOUNT OF BOND- $ 96,500 Subdivision Bond CHECK NUMBER 1322703972 DEPARTMENT PLANNING SUBMITTED BY Lauren L. Zarambo 1/19/16 NAME DATE PROCESSED BY FINANCE ✓J c�� /� NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER �O O a / 9 MUNIS APPLICATION 201200635 WAPlanning Admin\PZC\Bonds\2016 Bonds\12-28 Nutmeg Village Subdivision Bond Transmittal.doc January 19, 2016 Michelle R. Lipe Director of Planning South Windsor Planning Department 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: M.G. Realty LLP—Sale of Industrial Lots, South Satellite Road to Dalo, LLC Dear Ms. Lipe: The purpose of this letter is to confirm that Dalo, LLC ("Dalo") is purchasing from M.G. Realty LLP (previously known as M.G. Realty Limited Partnership)("M.G. Realty") the six industrial lots located on the south side of South Satellite Road, which are part of the Nutmeg Village Subdivision. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the parties, Dalo is required to provide a replacement bond for the $96,500.00 subdivision bond posted by M.G. Realty with the Town of South Windsor.. To that end, enclosed with this letter is a certified check from Dalo in the amount of$96,500.00 payable to the Town of South Windsor, together with a W-9 tax form for Dalo. Please accept the enclosed check in substitution for the existing bond posted by M.G. Realty and release the existing bond, together with any accrued interest thereon, to M.G. Realty. Please note that the sale of the lots is in escrow pending M.G. Realty's receipt of a check from the Town representing the return of its bond. We understand that the Town controller's office issues checks on Thursdays and requires not less than two (2) days' advance notice. Therefore, we anticipate the check will be issued on Thursday, January 21, and would appreciate the controller's or your office contacting either Arnold Greenberg (860-680-4113) or his attorney, Thomas Mitchell (860-241-2685), when the check is available to be picked up at Town Hall. We thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, DALO, LLC = By: 2 Name: David Dyke jc�kj Its: Member M.G. REALTY LLP By: Q0). Name: Arnold C. Greenberg f Its: General Partner Enclosure TBM/28223/9/1349526v2 01/04/16-HRT/TBM PAYMENT SUMMARY RECEIPT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 DATE: 01/19/16 CUSTOMER#: 000700549 TIME: 15:20 DALO, LLC CLERK: laurenlz RECPT#: 20837036 PREV BAL: TP/YR: MS/2016 AMT PAID: 96500.00 BILL: ADJSTMNT: EFF DT: 01/19/16 BAL DUE: PERMITS/INSP PAYMENT -----------------TOTALS----------------- PRINCIPAL PAID: 96500.00 INTEREST PAID: .00 ADJUSTMENTS: .00 DISC TAKEN: .00 AMT TENDERED: 96500.00 AMT APPLIED: 96500.00 CHANGE: .00 PAID BY: DALO, LLC PAYMENT METH: CHECK PAYMENT REF: 1322703972 ` RECEIVED GUE PROJECT: l�uTw�uL, UILt-A TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STREET: BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z ID: 1a.- BSsP 2007 CALENDAR YEAR ENGINEER: AtocygEw DATE: - o _ WORK REMAINING BOND BOND UNIT REDUCTION NO. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST 1 2 1 CLEARING &GRUBBING LS STRIP&STOCKPILE 2 TOPSOIL CY 5.00 EARTH EXCAVATION (EXCLUDING ROADWAY 3 &TRENCH CY 14.00 ROADWAY 4 EXCAVATION CY 14.00 EARTH TRENCH EXC. 5 (0-4ft) CY 10.00 EARTH TRENCH EXC. 6 (0-1 Oft) CY 14.00 EARCH TRENCH EXC. 7 (0- 15ft) CY 25.00 EARTH TRENCH EXC. 8 10-20ft) CY 45.00 9 ROADWAY EXC. (ROCK) CY 65.00 ROCK TRENCH EXC. 10 (0-4ft) CY 100.00 ROCK TRENCH EXC. 11 (0-1-Oft) - __ CY- _ 125.00 ROCK TRENCH EXC. 12 (0-15ft) CY 140.00 ROCK TRENCH EXC. 13 (0-20ft) CY 150.00 FORMATION OF _ . _ 14 SUBGRADE SY 2.00 - 1-5 SUBBASE GRAVEL CY_- __ 25_00 PROCESSED 16 AGGREGATE TONS 27.00 17 COMMON BORROW CY 21.00 s/engineering/forms/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 1 WORK REMAINING BOND BOND UNIT REDUCTION NO. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST 1 2 18 GRAVEL BORROW CY 22.00 BIT. 19 CONCRETE(CLASS 1) TONS 78.00 BIT. 20 CONCRETE(CLASS 11) TONS 75.00 6 ASPHALT LIP 21 CURBING LF 4.00 ROAD WIDENING 22 COMPLETE SY 60.00 CONC. SIDEWALK 4' 23 WIDE LF 1,7 i 5 45.00 t-77,175 - STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 60"RCP CLASS IV IN 24 PLACE LF 120.00 �54"RCP CLASS IV IN 25 PLACE LF 100.00 48"RCP CLASS IV IN 26 PLACE LF 100.00 142"RCP CLASS IV IN 27 PLACE LF 85.00 136"RCP CLASS IV IN 28 PLACE LF 76.00 130"RCP CLASS IV IN 29 PLACE LF 62.00 124"RCP CLASS IV IN 30 PLACE LF 58.00 31 1 18"RCP CLASS IV IN PLACE LF 48.00 15"RCP CLASS IV IN 321 PLACE 45.00 POLYETHYLENE PIPE 33 8"ADS-N-12 OR EQUAL 25.00 34 10"ADS-N-12 OR EQUAL 30.00 35 12"ADS-N-12 OR EQUAL 35.00 36 15"ADS-N-12 OR EQUAL 40.00 37 18"ADS-64-12 OR EQUAL 45.00 = 38 TOTAL 1%-7-7, 1-75 SAD 0.00 0.00 s/engineering/forms/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 2 WORK REMAINING BOND BOND UNIT REDUCTION N0. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST 1 2 UNDERDRAINS 40 6"PVC SDS 35 IN PLACE LF 30.00 41 8"PVC SDR 35 IN PLACE LF 1 32.00 RIPRAP 42 MODIFIED RIPRAP CY 77.00 43 INTERMEDIATE RIPRAP CY 79.00 .44 STANDARD RIPRAP CY 97.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 45 TYPE"C"CATCH BASIN JEA 3,000.00 TYPE"C"DOUBLE 46 GRATE lEA 4,000.00 TYPE"'C-L"CATCH 47 BASIN EA 3,000.00 48 MANHOLE EA 3,000.00 MANHOLE W/DROP 49 INLET EA 5,000.00 MANHOLE OVER TEN 50 FEET EA 4,800.00 51 HEADWALL EA 52 ENDWALL EA 53 BOX CULVERT LF :�54 15"FLARED END EA 670.00 55 18"FLARED END EA 750.00 56 24"FLARED END JEA 900.00 57 36"FLARED-END lEA 1,200.00 DETENTION OUTLET 58 STRUCTURE JEA 4,500.00 WIDE-GRAVE- - -- 59 ACCESSROAD LF 15.00 - 60 RESET M.H. OR C.B. - EA - - -- - 900.00 - - - - - s/engineering/fonns/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 3 WORK REMAINING BOND BOND qPRICE REDUCTION NO. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITYCOST 1 2 61 62 63 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 12"PVC IN PLACE SDR 6435 ILF 1 110.00 10"PVC IN PLACE SDR 6535 LF. 90.100 . 66 8"PVC IN PLACE SDR 35 1 LF 82.00 67 6"PVC IN PLACE SDR 35 LF 44.00 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 68 Sanitary Manhole lEA 3,850.00 SANITARY MANHOLE 69 W/DROP INLET EA 5,600.00 SANITARY MANHOLE 70 OVER 10 FT. 4,500.00 71 72 STRUCTURES &MISC ITEMS MODULAR BLOCK 73 RETAINING WALL ISF 1 55.00 74 4'FENCE (TYPE: ) �LF 12.00 GUIDE RAIL 75 (TYPE: ) LF 60.00 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 s/engineering/forms/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 4 L • WORK REMAINING BOND BOND UNIT REDUCTION NO. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST 1 2 STRUCTURES &MISC ITEMS (CONT'D END ANCHORAGE (TYPE: 76 ) lEA 1,000.00 77 GUIDE POST EA 140.00 78 PAVEMENT MARKING LF 2.00 79 STREET SIGNS EA 130.00 80 TRAFFIC SIGNS EA 130.00 81 STREET LIGHTS EA 1,000.00 FURNISHING/PLACING 82 TOPSOIL SY 7.00 FERTILIZING, SEEDING 83 AND MULCHING SY 7.00 84 TREES lEA 200.00 MAINTENANCE/PROTEC 85 TION OF TRAFFIC LS CONSTRUCTION 86 STAKING LS 87 AS-BUILTS LS 88 IRON PINS EA 150.00 CONCRETE 89 MONUMENTS lEA 350.00 90 DRIVEWAY-BIT. CONC. �SY 40.00 91 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 - s/engineering/forms/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 5 J WORK REMAINING BOND BOND UNIT REDUCTION NO. REDUCTION NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST 1 2 Original Estimate Bond Reduction#1 Bond Reduction #2 _ TOTAL-PAGE 1--- - — - --Oft TOTAL PAGE 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PAGE 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 9;w 0.00 0.00 25%Contingencies x 41cf,al Z.'75 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 69 0.00 0.00 s/engineering/forms/bond estimates/bondestimateform 2007-1 Page 6 P.O.BOX 1167 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 FAX:860.291.8757 VICOSi011° . ' 25 th Anniversary 1986-2011 www.designprofessionalsinc.com CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS / PLANNERS/ SURVEYORS I GIS ANALYSTS f LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serwng Connecticut, Massachusetts, t Rhode/s/and s , Mr. Jeffrey Doolittle October 5, 2012 Town Engineer % 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 f Dear Jeff: Re: Monumentation Installation Resubdivision Nutmeg Village s South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Proj. No. 1308 s s Please be advised that our firm has been authorized by Arnold Greenberg and Robert Urso to install all of the monumentation (missing or proposed iron pins and monuments per the approved plan) associated with the above-referenced resubdivision application, and that our survey department will complete said installation on or before October 15, 2012. Thank you. i • • Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC. s T s s r By. Peter R. DeMalhe, President • Cc: Jeffrey Folger Michele Lipe Thomas Mitchell,Esq. s Ralph Alexander,Esq. Arnold Greenberg Robert Urso Lawrence Geissler,L.S. Benjamin Wheeler, R.L.A. Andrew Krar, P.E. • • • • • s s • • s • • s s • s • G-\jobs\]308%Correspondencei1 308-Monumentatlon Installation Letter,10-5-12.doc Page 1 of 1 .rr Doolittle, Jeffrey From: Peter DeMallie [PDeMallie@designprofessionalsinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:34 PM To: Doolittle, Jeffrey; Folger, Jeffrey; Lipe, Michele; Zarambo, Lauren L. Cc: Mitchell,Thomas B.; 'Ralph Alexander'(reexander@willard-alexander.com); Bob Urso; Ben Wheeler; Larry Geissler;Anne DeMallie;Andy Krar Subject: Monumentation Installation Completed at Nutmeg Village Resubdivision Please be advised that today our survey department completed installation of all missing or proposed monuments and iron pins, as depicted on the approved resubdivision mylars for the above-referenced project.Thank you and please contact Messrs. Lawrence Geissler, L.S. or Stanley Kryla, L.S. if you should have any questions on this matter. Peter R. DeMallie President&Principal Design Professionals, Inc. CIVIL&TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS/GIS/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,&Rhode island P.O.Box 1167 860.291.8755 phone 425 Sullivan Avenue 860.291.8757 fax South Windsor,CT 06074 www.desionr)rofessionalsinc.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure or distribution is prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 10/11/2012