Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApp 11-20P CREC International Magnet Sc TOWN.OF SOUTH WnMaoit PLANNING&ZONING CORN! MON APPLI f� fa . ` Application No: RECEIVED pp k Official Receipt Date: JUL 08 2011 Receipt No: SQlRH .�-. .w W ORPiAWN8,0K APPLICANT: - \ U 1 t.t \D U C•fL- PROJECT NAME: rP. WtAglaJAl_.. V-1c te.HCOL , ADDRESS: -111 QAAfV 2- OAV- . 1 A col Cam" U91O4 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: J I LA,60 tQ V.A9,- N�r-XG ADDRESS: -P0 �X 416 j 2CQ SU"NL ll AVM NVI,lf SOP-, C4r OtPOZ.8 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY - L.01' 80'7 L.0),4 t, f 4l Ll, P D ASSESSORS MAP# I PARCEL# ) ZONE PKAS^L, F106 1 ►4t., V'2q 1 NAME,ADDRESS,TEL&FAX#OF PERSON TO WHOM!INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Estimated presentation tune: Zr6 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply)': Zone Change to - D (Public Hearing required and Certificate of Mailing ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision []' 'Open Space Subdivision(Public Hearing Required) W1 A : Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major Resubdivision(:Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor❑ Major Conditional Approval Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing,Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Site Plan of Development General Plan of Development-State Hearing per Section 14-55>for [], Earth ,l; (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal(Sec. 14-Public Hearing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑Zoning ❑Subdivision-Attach proposed amendment(Public Hearing Required!) El Temporary and Conditional Permit for(Public Hearing Required) .In Law, apartment/Accessory Apartment(Public Hearing Requited) Major Home Occupation for(Public Hearing.Required) ❑ Other(explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required,to be posted on the property for al applimt Ions ten(10)days prior to being heard by the`Com�m�ssioa. Signature of Applicant 4aWAof&peZ�6�ff �� c r - - • •4 . •�. � � `r{ -\ •+vm fit.(... J: lv'. TTOZ aagogop DZZ 'asladaa4ug HM}I Act paa�da zd Tzounoo uo-c4-eonpS uozbad TOgTd'eD OagD :aog peapdsad ZII7IS7aNNoZ) 'EOSCNIM HIMS L slS=VNV Sl3VdNj Dz33V-dy zooxOS zdNDVN aVNOISFINEajN2 aa23Z) x Table of Contents INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . 1 1. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1. Major Roadways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2. Intersection Level of Service Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3. Traffic Volumes and Capacity Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. Future No-Build Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. Future Build Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3. Sight Distance Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.4. Analysis of Daily Traffic Volumes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.5. Pedestrian Access to School and Signage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 APPENDIX: CAPACITY ANALYSIS REPORTS. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION The Capitol Region Education Council (CREC) proposes to construct a new building for an International Magnet School on Chapel Road and Long Hill Road in South Windsor, CT. The proposed school includes a 62,700 square-foot building and 165 parking spaces. The school will accommodate 435 students and 65 faculty and staff. This study will evaluate three traffic scenarios: existing condition (September 2011) , future without proposed development (2013) and future with the proposed school (2013) . 1. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The school is proposed to be located at the south west corner of the Chapel Road and Long Hill Road intersection. Figure 1 shows the project site and the surrounding road network. In order to identify the intersections that would be impacted by the proposed development, we performed a traffic distribution analysis based on the geo-coded addresses of the CREC students. This analysis showed that the three intersections of Chapel Road with Long Hill Road and Ellington Road and also the intersection of Long Hill Road and Burnham Street would be mostly impacted by the proposed project. 1.1. Major Roadways There are four major roadways in the vicinity of the project site: Chapel Road: The 2-lane arterial road stretches from, Main Street in the west and extends all the way to the east and south to Tolland Turnpike. The road width at the vicinity of the project site is about 30' and there is a sidewalk on the north side of the road separated from the pavement by a landscaping strip. Chapel Road serves mostly the residential land uses and also a few commercial and educational land uses. Chapel Road is a Town of South Windsor road. The posted speed is 35 mph: i - qf�1_ ttr� ilporin l£ junk r? _haal a, La' cif j Oarc 30 `+ r 1chool ' ® �i 5 a 6 �✓' ;�,t „"vim.::,,,;,,, ': b !I 5 r a -, '` BUIr .L'fja nl -, A- s f t / E o _ GI! `6 frf�art Phes 4u n tit m 8 1P Rene m _ v v s Q g, et Square 01 £E Rbberh (-$ftn', hark- t rf ��""" • � ,�O _ �,,n. 131v East Harvord Goff Course Fast Hartford Goff Club ,� F Y0 Study Intersections sE�-�- -�`�--�.," _ �vet �; - ,r Project Site 3. r a CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impact Study Figure 1- Study Area o 0.05 0.1 0.2 ®Miles CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 2 Route 30 (Ellington Road) : Route 30 is an arterial 2-lane state road starting at US Route 5 (John Fitch Blvd./Ellington Rd.) in the south-west and extends to the north-east. It intersects Route 4 at Exit 4 of I-291. The road width at the vicinity of the study area is about 30' with no sidewalk. Route 30 serves mostly residential land uses and also a number of agricultural, commercial and educational land uses. Route 30 intersects Route 5 at Exit 4 of I-291. The posted speed is 30 mph. Long Hill Road: Long Hill Road is a 2-lane north-south arterial with a 30' pavement width and no sidewalk. Almost all the land uses along this road are residential. Long Hill Road is a town of South Windsor Road. The posted speed is 35 mph. Burnham_ Street: Burnham Street is a 2-lane east-west arterial with a 20' pavement width and no sidewalk. This road serves a mix of commercial, industrial and residential uses Burnham Street is a town of East Hartford Road. The posted speed is 30 mph. 1.2. Intersection Level of Service Definitions Using peak-hour traffic volumes, calculated peak-hour factors, geometric characteristics and signal phasing, all intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 method. Traffic conditions are described in the Highway Capacity Manual in terms of level of service (LOS) with the levels ranging from LOS A, which represents the best traffic flow condition, to LOS F, which represents the worst condition. Level of service C is generally considered the design level of service, while LOS D is generally considered as the acceptable limit during peak hours. Level of service E is typically at or near the capacity of the roadway or intersection and generally involves unacceptable delays. Levels of service for signalized intersections are defined in terms of average control delay per vehicle. Delay depends on a number of variables including the quality of signal progression, cycle length, green ratio and the volume/capacity ratio for the lane group or approach in question. For a signalized intersection, levels of service can be calculated and expressed for each movement or approach and for the total intersection as a weighted average of all movements. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle for the worst 15-minute period within the peak hour, as CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 3 shown in Table 1. Control delay includes initial deceleration ccelay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Table 1- Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Average Control Delay Service (seconds/vehicle) A 10.0 or less B 10.1 to 20.0 C 20.1 to 35.0 D 35.1 to 55.0 E 55.1 to 80.0 F more than 80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, TRB Special Report 209, Fourth Edition, 2000 Update. Level of service analyses for un-signalized intersections are based on average control delay, defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. This includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last-in-queue position to the first-in-queue position. The total delay for a particular minor movement is a function of the service rate or capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. The level of service criteria are shown in Table 2. Table 2- Level of Service Criteria for Un-Signalized Intersections Level of Average Control Delay Service (seconds/vehicle) A 10.0 or less B 10.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 F more than 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, TRB Special Report 209, Fourth Edition, 2000 Update. 1.3. Traffic Volumes and Capacity Analysis We performed a vehicle turning movement count at the intersections of Chapel Road/Long Hill Road, Chapel Road/Ellington Road and Long Hill Road/Burnham Street on Tuesday September 13, 2011 from lam to 9am. and also from 2:30pm to 5:30pm. This covers the adjacent street and the school morning and afternoon peak hours. The street peak hours occurred from 7:15am and 8:15am and from 4:30pm to 5:30pm. The afternoon school peak hour is from 2:45pm to 3:45pm. Figure 2 shows the AM, PM t AM Peak Hour L 16 L 20 240 319 23 4— 85 8 77 8 4— 118 «J 1 1, r- 50 .J 1 b rr 14 chapel Rd. 26 ti t r 2 -J '1 t r 4, y 8 % 16 63 y 25 47 8 21 19 Protect Site L 10 22 71 17 F 68 4 r 41 Bumham U. g ,� 41 t r 27 40 62 13 32 PM Sehool Peak Hour L9 L10 46 297 13 4— 52 7 57 18 4— 43 «J l #,. r-- 9 .J 1 r 5 Chapel Rd. 37 ti t r 12 J4'1 t f 43 y 10 99 77 104 y 20 84 16 8 18 Protect Site La 9 70 1 4m 40 J 1 t.III r' 29 Bumham Rd. 15 ' 4,1 t r 52 •y 37 102 29 5 8 m' 3 PM Peak Hour L 18 L 8 97 469 19 4— 57 4 55 16 4— 57 J j r 17 #J 1 t+ !" 7 chapel Rd. 114 ..l t r 5 1 11 't" r 72 17 106 83 148 .* 31 94 23 16 27 Protect Site , L2 6 71 7 4— 45 1 4 r 42 Burnham Rd. 17 ,J t r 89 44 128 51 5 x Figure 2-Existing Traffic Volumes-AM,PM School&PM Peak Hours School Seatember2011 i CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 4 school and PM street peak hour traffic volumes at these - _ - --intersections. We collected the required signal timing/phasing information and the geometric and lane configuration measurements in the field. The intersection of. Chapel Road and Ellington Road operates with an actuated signalized controller. The intersections of Long Hill Road with Chapel Road and Burnham Street are all-way stop controlled. CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 5 Table 3 shows the capacity analysis results for the existing arc conditions the t ree inte-rsections. Table 3- Existing Condition Capacity Analysis Result Existing Traffic Conditions Intersection Control Type Lane Group/ AM Peak PM School PM Peak Movement Hour Peak Hour Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Eastbound C 22.4 C '24.2 C 26.7 Ellington Westbound C 30.7 C 30.5 C 30.5 Road & Signalized Northbound A 4.3 A 3.9 A 4.5 Chapel Road Southbound A 8.5 A 7.4 A 8.8 Overall B 113.0 B 111. 71 B 13. 7 Chapel Road Eastbound A 8.5 A 9.1 A 9.7 & Long Hill Unsignalized Westbound A 9.1 A 8.5 A 8.7 Road Northbound A 8.8 A 8.8 A 9.6 Southbound A 8.8 A 8.9 A 8.8 Long Hill Eastbound A 8.7 A ' 8.9 A 9.8 Road & Westbound A 9.4 A . 8.9 A 9.6 Burnham Unsignalized Northbound A 9.4 A 9.9 B 10.5 street Southbound A 1 9.4 1 A 1 8.6 1 A 1 9.4 As can be seen the signalized intersection of Chapel and Ellington Roads is working at an average LOS B during all peak periods and the two stop-controlled intersections are operating at LOS A and B. 2. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS To evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed school on the intersections, the traffic conditions without and with the proposed development will be analyzed in this section. 2.1. Future No-Build Traffic Conditions The future no-build conditions include the additional traffic generated by future developments that have been approved but not yet built near the 3 intersections plus the annual traffic growth. There are two major developments proposed close to the proposed school site. One is a 317,000 SF television studio (Studio Connecticut) between Chapel Road, Ellington Road and Route 5 with access to both Chapel and Ellington Roads. The other major development is the Town Square at Evergreen Walk development located at 151 Buckland Road. CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 6 The Evergreen Walk project is about 3 miles north-east of the school site. We did not project any traffic from this development onto the three intersections adjacent to the school site. The ADT data provided by ConnDOT for the adjacent roadways show a very small increase (less than 0.5%) in traffic volumes since 1998 to 2007. To be conservative we assume a 1% background growth rate for the next two years. Figure 3 shows future no-build traffic volumes during the AM, PM School and PM peak hours. Table 4 shows the capacity analysis results for the future no-build traffic conditions at the three intersections. Table 4- Future No-Build Condition Capacity Analysis Result No-Build Traffic Conditions Intersection Control Type Lane Group/ AM Peak PM School PM Peak Movement Hour Peak Hour Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Eastbound C 22.4 C 24.2 C 26.5 Ellington Westbound C 31.0 C 30.5 C 30.3 Road & Signalized Northbound A 4.4 A 4.0 A 4.8 Chapel Road Southbound A 1 8.9 A 7.6 1 A 9.1 Overall B 113.3 B 11.6 B 13.6 Eastbound A 8.6 A 9.3 B 10.0 Chapel Road Westbound A 9.3 A 8.5 A 8.8 & Long Hill Unsignalized Road Northbound A 8.9 A 8.9 A 9.7 Southbound A 8.9 A 9.0 A 8.9 Long Hill Eastbound A 8.7 A 9.0 A 9.9 Road & Unsignalized Westbound A 9.5 A 9.0 A 9.7 Burnham Northbound A 9.4 B 10.0 B 10.7 Street Southbound A 1 9.4 1 A 1 8.7 1 A 9.5 As can be seen all intersections in the study area are operating under the same levels of service as for the existing conditions. 2.2. Future Build Traffic Conditions Table 5 shows the traffic generation assumptions for the number of students, faculty and staff. The modal split and student occupancy assumptions used for the students are based on statistics obtained from CREC. The percentage of trips assigned to the various peak hours has been estimated by us based on our experience and data from CREC regarding students' pre-school and post-school activities. As can be seen the proposed school is projected to generate a total of 359, 308 and 83 vehicles during the AM, PM School and PM peak hours, respectively. AM Peak Hour � L 16 L20 245 345 23 4— 87 8 79 8 4— 130 j 1 4 r 61 j 4 r- 14 Chapel Rd. 27 ..t ' 1 t r 2 1 t r 46 8 103 16 64 .y 26 48 8 1 21 -- 79-�--- m Protect Site L 10 22 72 17 4— 69 j r 42 Bumham Rd. 8 1' 01 t r1 28 •y 41 63 13 5 33 m' x PM School Peak Hour i L 9 L 10 47 305 13 1 4— 53 7 58 18 4— 44 4J 4 L. r 9 J 1 L* r 5 Chapel Rd. 38 1 In t r 12 1 4'1 t r 44 y 10 111 84 11, uq 20 86 16 8 18 I a I Protect Site , L3 91 71 1 4— 41 t+ 1 4 r 30 Bumham Rd. 15 41 t r 53 y 38 104 30 8 � m x PM Peak Hour L 18 L 8 99 483 19 58 4 56 16 4— 58 •J 1 1,. r 17 J 1 r 7 Chapel Rd. 116 1' "t t r 5 1 1 t r 73 17 128 95 161 32 96 23 16 ? 21 i fl_ Protect Site i L2 6 72 7 4— 46 4J j 1, r 43 Bumham Rd. 17 _J ' t r 91 uq 45 131 52 5 m x 3 Figure 3-Future No-Build Conditions-AM,PM School&PM Peak Hours • Se tember 2011 s CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 7 Table 5- Proposed Development Trip Generation Calculations Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Adjacent Passengers Arrival/ (Adjacent PM School Street Peak Mode Occup.Veh. Departure Street) Peak Hour Hour Rate PM PM Type # AM School Street In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Peak Peak take 44%school 14 14 100% 90% 10% 14 14 28 13 13 26 1 1 2 Students 435 bus* 56,drop-off/ 1.5 1612 90% 80% 20% 146 146 292 130 130 260 32 32 64 pick-up Faculty/ 65 95%drive 1.1 56 70% 40% 30% 39 0 1 39 1 0 22 22 0 17 17 Staff alone Total 1199 1601 359 1143 1651 308 133 501 83 * Based on the CREC's estimations Figure 4 shows geo-coded addresses of the currently enrolled CREC students. To maintain safe and orderly circulation conditions within the school site; the school bus traffic is assigned to the Chapel Road access, the parent drop-off/pick-up traffic to the Long Hill Road and staff traffic to either driveway. This will result in the most orderly and safe circulation pattern and will permit efficient queuing for parent drop-off and pick up. It should be noted that not all students arrive. for the same start or finish period. About 38% of the students come early for pre-care, and 47% stay late for aftercare. Figure 5 shows the resulting traffic distribution percentages based on the student addresses. The percentages shown in Figure 5 represent the combined distribution of the three traffic groups (school buses, student drop-off/pick-ups and faculty/staff) . The assignment of the various traffic groups will be enforced by signage and school personnel. Using the traffic generation table and the traffic distribution percentages, we assigned the additional traffic volumes generated by the proposed development for the three peak hours onto the street network. Figure 6 shows the additional traffic volumes added by the proposed school. Figure 7 shows' the future build traffic volumes and Table 6 shows the future capacity analysis results with the proposed school. A La'Le ahn 5 mT ri€ ak eado Svc 1t u�r WmnE a E3=k -aka - ..a•....> r erwood Aga — o , e!vo! le. £ i a3rriGk 1« r�z r c Cat Scan t�ertete Pa" 15 } 8 Sim',Nley La ok creS IMF fSIti Lg -' — Sr V n< n 1 1 $ 4 37 Al , € . the Lake _.._ I He Sr Brook€ ury Conte F 3@S B:i.�k a - _-�.'�ca:t'3It t: tfi 30 74 - fir penwo Pa k' 74 yv 32 v� Ue iks ar HePark .ekes Stu L a td0 31 nsTield Waito>wa 44 s mar r> :c entry La = �• h Coven � Mait§iietd r` 4 Taylor Reservoir L Mkt �6 72 1 - D6 Gay irttta. t' 6 g am. F ova€La 6 -:Coi(I:ra ke _.. 7 or d Gl sto RK", Pome irk k r ry h Wind ge IDAI 87 I ' g .—Ole Terra us w 71 - dr cislor.Lake ' Cram v Boy i r 2 r u -s I - P#N.i�r°..z3 kt " Lake Po 9 `. •' Ord d knon KIVOr< IMON -amen State pa I y ` _ - $ 18 w Sat R".64te orest t�eber rnci L?aPi S Park is Par Iiatown ,tjkm - a5 iuer. 8 i 'it k Oft a to G Rs�k'es2r�ro: r sty ark s rtc Project Site 15 L Y ! Student Address x' mourStPark rro I ke: U,a S t r. to dt P SaI33xon RPr Us' R + 775Z82 CREC.International Magnet School Traffic Impact Study Figure 4- Students Addresses ° 1.25 2.5 5 Miles A Regional Traffic DistribuRon �.'. a 41 yi -- . : 7Al .1� • a 0 /a 47% 1 - so £' Nll y Local T D'raffic Estnbution, (E L 1% L t 4-. 12% 11% lo. 4m Sri «� 1 �► r 9% r «� 1 �► r AS Chapel Rd. 2TI; 's '� 11% 5% 3%a 1101 3% 14% 1�. m ProfectSite ' 1% «J 1 2B% ..1 41 1 0 s .� m 56% W 0 L 47% 10% # «J 1 4 r Burnham Rd. 1 r s ours - Figure 5•Traffic Distribution Percentages Se ember 2011 Y AM Peak Hour L2 L 2 p., 19 p. 18 2 6 4- 6 1 �► ,�"' 14 t. 10 1 rr 28 chapl Rd. 1 r 22 r 2 1 41t r 2 �► 40 22 '� 18 8 5 H 20 5 23 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 24- --- - - - - - - _ - 8 Prolect Site 56 2 k, 2� .J 1 Out 161 45 1 41 t 90 112 2 L 76 16 4- J Bumham Rd. 94 ...1 411 t r► y 20 � 5 m x PM School Peak Hour L2 L 1 r 15 r 78 «J 1 r 20 Chapel Rd. 1 t r 16 y r 2 t r 1 �► 29 16 18 8 5 �► 19 5 23 18 s Project Site ; ;- In 143 .Out 165 46 t 92 .-1 80 1 L 78 17 ~ «J 1 4 r Bumham Rd. 67 41 t r► �► 14 x PM Peak Hour L1 L 0 4- 6 4. 6 0 1 4� 1 1 5 r 2 «J 1 r 5 Chapel Rd. -J '1 t r 4 �► r 1 ...t 41 t r 0 i..► 7 4 6 3 2 6 2 7 � 5 Project She 10 1 Out 51 14 j t 29 19 0 L 24 5 ~ «J 1 b r Bumham Rd. 76 1 *1 t r .y 3 x - Figure 6-Project Traffic Volumes-AM,PM School&PM Peak Hours School Se tuber 2011 AM Peak Hour L 18 L 20 245 345 25 4� 106 4— 18 10 85 8 4— 136 a 1 L, r 75 r 10 J 1 r 42 Chapel Ra. 27 1 41 t 22 —► 141 4 48 8 103 56 22 —1 18 8 69 y 46 53 31 -- - — - -21 --- — - - — - — 43 Protect Site 56 2 .J 1 45 .J t 90 112 2 Z L 10 98 88 17 69 J 1 L. r 42 Bumhom Rd. 102 1 it r► 28 •y 41 83 13 33 x PM school Peak Hour 10 47 305 14 4— 73 4— 18 8 62 18 I# 4"i 48 J l r 24 r 74j 1L, r 25 Chapel Rd. 38 3 41 '� f 16 41 1 14 1 41 T r 45 10 111 113 16 18 8 116 39 91 39 8 36 Z �. 40 2 Protect Site � 1— 46 41 92 80 1 t- 3 87 88 1 4— 41 j 1 L. r 30 Bumhom Rd. 82 41 t r► 53 38 118 30 8 a� x PM Peak Hour L 19 t.. 8 99 483 19 4— 64 6 4 57 16 4— 59 1 4++ r 22 r 2 1 r 12 Chapel Rd. 116 1 E In t r 4 y 41 r 6 1 41 t r 73 17 128 102 4 6 3 163 .y 38 98 30 16 26 _a Protect Site 10 1 � 1 14 41 t 29 19 0 L2 30 77 7 4- 46 4J 1 L. r 43 Bumham Rd. 33, ,J 41 t r 91 45 134 52 x Figure 7-Future Build Conditions-AM,PM School&PM Peak Hours soud.)Windsor,CT Se mbar 2011 CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 8 Table 6- Future Condition Capacity Analysis with Proposed School No-Build Traffic Conditions Build Traffic Conditions Intersection Control Type Lane Group/ AM Peak PM School PM Peak AM Peak PM School PM Peak Movement Hour Peak Hour Hour Hour Peak Hour Hour LO3 IDelay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Eastbound C 22.4 C 24.2 C 26.5 C 20.5 C 23.2 C 26.3 Ellington Westbound C 31.0 C 30.5 C 30.3 C 28.6 C 30.2 C 30.4 Road & Signalized Northbound A 4.4 A 4.0 A 4.8 A 5.5 A 4.6 A 4.9 Chapel Road Southbound A 8.9 A 7.6 A 9.1 B 10.31 A 8.2 A 9.3 Overall B 113.3 B 11. 61 B 13.61 B 13.8 B 112. 71 B 13. 7 Chapel Road Eastbound A 8.6 A 9.3 B 10.0 A 9.5 B 10.1 B 10.3 & Long Hill Unsignalized Westbound A 9.3 A 8.5 A 8.8 B 11.0 A 9.4 A 9.0 Road Northbound A 8.9 A 8.9 A 9.7 B 10.1 B 10.0 B 10.2 Southbound A 8.9 A 9.0 A 8.9 A 9.8 A 9.6 A 9.1 Long Hill Eastbound A 8.7 A 9.0 A 9.9 C 16.1 B 13.0 B 10.6 Road & Westbound A 9.5 A 9.0 A 9.7 B 11.9 B 10.5 B 10.1 urnham UnsignalizedNorthbound A 9.4 B 10.0 B 10.7 B 12.4 B 12.7 B 11.2 Street Southbound A 1 9.4 A 1 8.7 1 A 1 9.5 1 C 15.01 B 112.51 B 110.2 As can be seen, the intersections of Chapel Road with Ellington and Long Hill Roads operate at the same levels of service as in the no-build conditions during the three peak hours. The average delay increases on all approaches would be less than two seconds per vehicle. At the intersection of Long Hill Road and Burnham Street during the AM peak hour, due to the significant increase of the left- turn movement from eastbound Burnham Street to northbound Long Hill Road (drop-off traffic) , there would be an increase of 7 seconds in average delay. The returning traffic " will increase average delays on the southbound approach by about 5 seconds. These will change the levels of service from A to C at both approaches. It should be noted that the levels of service C predicted are "good" levels C since they are close to the B/C threshold of 15 seconds. We also see similar conditions during the PM school peak hour due to the pick-up traffic. The levels of service will change from A in no-build conditions to B in the build conditions. Regardless of the delay increase, the intersection of Burnham Street and Long Hill Road will continue to work at acceptable levels of service during all three peak hours. CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 9 - - 2.3. -_ Sight Distance Analysis - - - - - - - The posted speeds along both Chapel Road and Long Hill Road are 35 mile per hour. According to ConnDOT Highway Design Manual, the required intersection sight distance for a passenger car exiting a driveway along a roadway with a design speed of 35mph is 3901 . With the proposed tree trimming along the site frontages on Chapel Road and Long Hill Road, the sight distances measured 15, from edges of roadways at both site driveways can exceed 6001 , therefore satisfying the ConnDOT requirement. 2.4. Analysis of Daily Traffic Volumes Using the ADT (Annual Daily Traffic) data provided by ConnDOT, we extrapolated the ADT data along Chapel and Long Hill Roads adjacent to the proposed school driveways. Also by expanding the traffic generation table (Table 5) the proposed school daily traffic (ADT) would be 820 vehicles per day. By applying the trip distribution percentage (Figure 5) we calculated the proposed project ADT along Chapel and Long Hill Roads. Figure 8 shows the existing, project and future average daily traffic along Long Hill and Chapel Roads adjacent to the proposed school driveways. 2.5. Pedestrian Access to School and Signage Based on current demographics of school children, it does not appear that any kids would walk to this school. The pedestrian access is also difficult due to the fact that the surrounding neighborhood has only partial sidewalks. This situation should be monitored by the school to see if future children enrolled in the program may be in a situation to walk to and from school. If there will be school children walking, we recommend that the following improvements be considered: Stripe a pedestrian crossing across Long Hill Road north of Chapel Road, and also across Muriello Drive north of Chapel Road. A pedestrian crossing of Chapel Road near Muriello Drive and the r Existing Conditions 2673 Chapel Rd. 0 m x n. Praiect Site 12251 Additional Traffic by the proposed School 180 131 Chapel Rd. o x PE 1238 Praiect Site 1467 Future Conditions Conditions 2853 2804 Chapel Rd. r o 3 m I a 12489 Pro ite 12718 Figure 8 ° Se tember 2011 CREC International Magnet School Traffic Impacts Analysis 10 school entrance may also be considered, however, it is not certain that the crossing will be warranted from the point of view of the number of pedestrians. Advance school warning signs (S1-1) should be installed on Long Hill Road and Chapel Road about 300 feet on either side of the school driveways. 3. CONCLusioN The impact analysis shows that all intersections and approaches are operating at good levels of service and will continue to do so in the future with the proposed school. We conclude that the traffic impacts of the proposed CREC International Magnet School on the surrounding street network would be insignificant and that no mitigation measures are needed. APPENDIX: CAPACITY ANALYSIS REPORTS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 26. 45 21. 50 85 16Z 8 96 16 23 319 240 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.fl Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0!85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow.(prot) 1770 1770 1770 1830 1770 1800 1854 1583 Fit Permitted 0.41 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.97 1.00 Safd.Flow(perm) 765 1770 1308 1830 683 1800 1799 1563 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.65 0.80 0.75 0.83 0.71 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.57 0.48 0.71 0.83 Adj.Flow;(vph) 40 56 281 60 120 % 12 96 28'' 48 449 289 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 22 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 0 118 Lane Croup Flow{vph} 40 62 0 60 128 0 12 115' 0 0 497 171: Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 153 15:3 8,9 8.9 46.7 46.7 415 41.5 Effective Green,g(s) 15.3 15.3 8.9 8.9 46.7 46.7 415 41.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0,13 0.13 0.67 0.67 0.59 0.59 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 0 3.0 3;0 3.0 &0 34 3 0 3:10 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 202 387 166 233 474 1201 1067 938 Ws Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.04 c0.07 0.00 c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.05 0.02 c0.28 0.11 u/c Ratio 010 0.16 0.36 0.55 0.03 0.10 0:47 US Uniform Delay,d1 22.1 22.1 28.0 28.7 4.8 4.1 8.0 6.5 Progression Factor 1°.00 1:.00 1-.00 1.00 1:.00 1.00 1°,00 1.i70 Incremental Delay,d2 0.5 0.2 1.3 2.6 0.0 0.2 1.5 0.4 Delay.{s) 22:5 223 29,3 31.,3 4.8 4.3 9.5 6.9 Level of Service C C C C _ q A A -A Approach Delay(s) 22.4 30 7 4.3 8.6 Approach LOS C C q A HCM Average Control Delay 13.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 047 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical:Lane Group Existing Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 a HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. Lane Configurations Sign Conficol Sip Stop Stour Stop. Volume(vph) 2 63 19 14 118 20 25 47 8 8 77 8 Peak Now Factor OZ f}78 0.80 (150 Q90 4,71 Q66 0,67 a88 i044 0;75 0.9 Hourly flow rate(vph) 8 81 24 28 131 28 38 70 9 18 103 14 y Volume Total(vph) 113 187 117 135 1Cafiume Left(vph} 8 28 38 18 Volume Right(vph) 24 28 - 9 _ 14 ladj(s) -0;08 -O c ; o.cr5 l cl4 Departure Headway(s) 4.7 -4.6 4.9 4.8 Degree Utilization,x 005 0.24 al-4 0.18 Capacity(veh/h) 711 727 690 698 Control Delay(sj 8;5 9.1 8,8 8: Approach Delay(s) 8.5 9.1 8.8 8.8 Approach LOS A A A A Delay 8;8. HCM Level of Service A - Intersedon Capacity Utihattiorr 31 8% ICU'Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) _ 15 - i �I Existing Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 i HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St Lane Configurations Sign.Control. Stop Stop Stop StOP7 . Volume(vph) 8 27 32 41 68 10 40 62 13 17 71 22 Peak Hour Factor &44 0.69 0.50 0.8-5 0.67 0.67 0.63 0:71 0.92 0:46 0.64 0 58 Hourly flow rate(vph) 18 39 64 48 101 15 63 87 14 37 111 38 Volume Total(vph) 121 165 165 186 Volume Left(vph) 18 48 63 37 Volume Right(vph) 64 15 14 38 Hadj(s) -0'25 0.04 0.06 405 Departure Headway(s) 4.8 5.0 4.9 4.8 Degree Utilization,x 016 0.23 0.23 0.25 Capacity(veh/h) 687 668 683 699 Control Delay(s); 8.7 9.4 9.4 9.4 Approach Delay(s) 8.7 9.4 9.4 9.4 Approach LOS A A A A Delay - 9.3 HCM Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 32 0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 I Existing Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 a HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. Lane Configurations Volume(Vph) 377 43 & 9 52 9 10 9 77 13 29 6 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.0U 0.93 too e'85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flaw(prot) 1770 1819 1770 1812 1770 1726'` 1857 1583 At Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 838 1:819 1318 1812 790 1726 1819 15H Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.56 0.72 0.56 0.63 0.99 0.80 0.46 0.75 0.72 Adj.Flow(vph) 64 64 12 16 72 16 16 100`i 96 28 396 64 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 10 0 0 13 0 0 30 0 0 0 25 Lane Group Flow(vph) 64 66 0 16 75 0 16 166' 0 0 424 39 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 g _ 2 g _ g Actuated Green,G(s) 136 13.6 7.2 7.2' 48.4 4844 431 43.1 Effective Green,g(s) 13.6 13.6 7.2 7.2 48.4 48.4 43.1 43.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 019 0.10 0.10 0.69 0.69 0.62 0.62 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) I'D 10 34 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3 0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 195 353 136 186 564 1193 1120 975 vts Ratio Prot c0.0.1' 004 0.04 000 ' c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.01 0.02 c0.23 0.02 vlc Ratio 0.3. 019 0.12 0;40 0.03 0.14 0.38 0 04 Uniform Delay,dl 23.7 23.6 28.5 29.4 3.9 3.7 6.7 5.3 Progression Factor too 1:.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1 00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.1 Delay(s) 247 23.8 28.9 30:8 3.9 3.9 77 5:4 Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 24.2 30.5 3.9 7.4 7{Approach LOS C C A A 1S'-/t,r�Ji,,�ikHt T _ _ /' _ /✓ "j,T / /� '; HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 36 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity.Utilization 41.6°!o ICU Level of Service A- Analysis Period(min) 15 c'; Critical:Larne Group Existing Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 12 104 18 5 43 10 20 84 16 18 57 7 lourfa r:. PeakTH Factor ��Q,75 Q.63it� i :, . i 66 0.83L: V11 189 7, .44 Hourly tow rate(vph)- 24 126 N -6 66 16 28 94 24 32 98 16 a. Volume Total(vph) 176 90 146 146 Volume Right(vph) 24 16 24 16 AM 405 -0-.03, U11 Departure Headway(s) 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 0.23, 012 0.19: 0.119 Capacity(veh/h) 711 691 715 705 Control t DebyN),1 -9.41 .&S 8,8 8 A.- Approach Delay(s) 9.1 8.5 8.8 8.9 App,mwdh L I OS A A -A A Delay :,:::8:9" - HCM Level of Service A in ter" ti wo 6v -of race A Capacity Fbiec-OM. fly Ub ation 24,3%; ICU ef 16M pad Utilization Analysis Period(min) Existing Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 a HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hitt Rd.&Burnham St. Y 1y. 2 ry { � f Lane Configurations n.Conr�l Siop: Stop: .._ Stop SSCp' Volume(vph) 15 52 8 29 40 3 37 102 29 1 70 9 Pear Hour Factor:; 0:5Gt 0y?1 OA4 0,8& 0 71 0h38 i1;53'. Q6*R.' 0 84' i�� ��4 8, Hourly flow rate(vph) 30 73 18 43 56 8 70 148 35 4 95 20 r 1 Mma Volume Total(vph) 121 107 252 119 Volume Left{vph) 30 43 70 4 . Volume Right(vph) 18 8 35 20 Nadj(s) 401 0,07, 0.01 fit}06 Departure Headway(s) 4.9 5.0 4.7 4.7 ,be gr1w t}filizatlen x 0.17 036 33 0,1fi Capacity(vehth) 667 652 738 706 Control Delay s); 8 g 8.9 9:9 8:6 Approach Delay(s) 8.9 8.9 9.9 8.6 Approach LC�S A A A A-. 797 Delay 9,3 HCM Level of Service A Intersectican Capacity UtiEization 29. °X© ICU Level of Service A— Analysis Analysis Period(min) 15 Existing Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. r. --b� -- ! Lane Configurations TO Volume(vph) 114 72 1:61, 17 57 18 17 106. 83 19 469 97 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s), 4.0t 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1:.00 W to(i 0.97 1..00 0,93 > 1.00 015 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd,Flow(prot) 1770 1800 1770 1807 1770 1737 16-58 1583 Fit Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd.Flaw(perm) 841 1800 1261 1807 653 1737 1823 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.86 0.74 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.77 0.68 0.94 0.93 Adj.Flow(vph) 13.3 97 28 24 80 20 20 132 108= 28 499 104 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 18 0 0 15 0 0 30 0 0 0 42 Lane Group Flow(vph) 133 107 0 24, 85 0 20 210 0 0 527 62 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 _ 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 14>7 14.7 I7.5 7.5 47.3 47.3 420 420 Effective Green,g(s) 14.7 14.7 7.5 7.5 47.3 47.3 42,0 42.0 Actuated glC Ratio 0.21 0.21 W 1 0.11 0,68 0.68 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time(s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension;(s). 3 0 10 10 3.0 3;0 &01 3.0. &0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 219 378 135 194 462 1174 1094 950 vi~s Ratio Prot c0.03 006 0.05 0,00 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.02 0.03 c0.29 0.04 We Ratio 0.61 0,28 0,18 0.44 0,04 0.18 0,48 0,07 Uniform Delay,d1 24.8 23.2 28.4 29.3 4.7 4.2 7.9 5.8 Progression Factor 1,00 1.00 1,00 1:.00 1,00 1,00 1°,00 1,00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.7 0.4 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.3 1.5 0.1 Delay(s) 29 5 23.6 29:1 308 « 4.7 4,5 924 6.0 Level of Service C C C C A _ A A A Approach Delay(s) 26.7 - 30.5 4.5 8.8 Approach LOS C _ C q A z , HCM Average Control Delay 13.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0,50 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection.Capacity Utilization 59,4% ICU Level of Service B. Analysis Period(min) _ 15 c Critical Lane Group Existing Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. Y / Lane Configurations , Sign.Dontrof, Siop Sip, p Step Volume(vph) 5 148 21 7 57 8 31 94 23 16 55 4 Peak'HourFactor 0,50 0$4 fl,85 t1,56 0,76 0 67 0;52 '," 0 88 0.72 0 6;t 0:82 0 58 Hourly flow rate(vph) 10 185 25 12 75 12 60 107 32 24 67 8 Volume Total(vph) 220 99 198 99 Volume LeftPIP 10 12 60 24 Volume Right(vph) 25 12 32 8 H dj(s) -0.02 t 01 II 00 O Departure Headway(s) 4.8 4.9 4.8 5.0 Degree Utilization x 0,29 0,14 0.27 0.14 Capacity(veh/h) 707 669 699 659 Control Delay(s) 97 83 96 8.8 Approach Delay(s) 9.7 8.7 9.6 8.8 Approach'LOS A A A A flay 9,4 HCM Level of Service p, Intersection.Gapaeity Utilization 27.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Existing Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St ,1 rint Lane Configurations „ sign:Corrtro< step Strp Sip Sip: Volume(vph) 17 89 5 42 45 2 44 in51 7 71 6 POW'141 or r Facto 0, 5 US7 . 4f 50 fl 73 0,g2; 0.7 : 0;6 Q B. 0 5fl Hourly flow rate(vph) 23 135 10 70 60 4 60 139 65 11 122 12 .,gym E Volume Total(vph) 168 134 264 146 Vot�ame Left,(yph 23 7t1 60 1} Volume Right(vph) 10 4 65 12 0 03 0.12 447 0,00 Departure Headway(s) 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.1 ...... ..... ..................... ... .. Oogree tltilizatiori;x 0,24 Q20- 036 f#21: Capacity(veh/h) 636 615 700 651 Control flay(s) ' 9;8 9.6 1?0t5 ': 9.4 Approach Delay(s) 9.8 9.6 10.5 9.4 ApproacllLos: A ;A t7elay 9;9 HCM Level of Service A ihtersectin:Capaedy Utllizatlon 37:1W lCU'Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 I Existing Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. 1 IS M r ; Lane Configurations Volume:(uph) 27 6 21 61 16 8 103 16 23 3 24 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total:Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0 4.0 4.0` 40 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1`.00 0 95 1;.Gor 0.98 "' 1.00 0.97' 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prat) 1770 1772 1770 1831 1770 1803 1854 1583 Fit Permitted 0.41 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm), 756 1772 1306 1831 638 1803' 4802 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.65 0.80 0.75 0.83 0.71 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.57 0.48 0.71 0.83 Adj.Flow(vph) 42 58 28 73 123 16 12 103 28 48 486 295 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 22 0 0 8 0 _ 0 9 0 0 0 120 Lane Group Flow(vph) 42 64 " 0 73 131 0 12 122 0 0 534 175 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected'Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 _ -2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 15;4 15.4 9:0 9.0 46.6 46.6 415 41.5 Effective Green,g(s) 15.4 15.4 9.0 9.0 46.6 46.6 41.5 41.5 Actuated;g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.67 0.67 0.59 0.59 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Whicle Extension(s) &0 &0 10° &0 3.01 10 &0 3,0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 201 390 168 235 443 1200 1068 938 u/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0 04 c0.07 0.00 W0 07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.06 0.02 c0.30 0.11 vte Ratio 0.21 0J6 0,43 0;56 0.03 0.10` 0,50 01:9 Uniform Delay,d1 22.0 22.1 28.2 28.6 5.0 4.2 8.2 6.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.5 0.2 1.8 2.9 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.4 Delay(s)' 22.5 22.3 29.9 31.5 &0 4.4 9:9 7.0 Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Dole (s) 22.4 3'1.0 4.4 '' 8<9 Approach LOS C C _ A A HCM Average Control Delay 13.3 HCM Level of Service B H'CM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42 8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group No-Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 s HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hilt Rd.&Chapel Rd. i Lane Configurations , Egn Cor Stuff. tp Volume(vph) 2 64 19 14 130 20 26 48 8 8 79 8 eak Hot)r'I=acior 0;25 78 ?80 0,50 (I;t a 71; 0y66 0.97 0.813 Q44 0.75 0.58 Hourly flow rate(vph) 8 82 24 28 144 28 39 72 9 18 105 14 i Volume Total(vph) 114 201 120 137 Volume Deft(ypl}' 8' 28.1 39 18 Volume Right(vph) 24 28 9 14 _ I add �) � -0 02 0, 5 OW Departure Headway(s) 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.8 Degrw;Utilliation x 015 0 26 16 U8' Capacity(veh/h) 703 723 682 690 Control Delay(s) 8 6 9:3 8.9 &.9 Approach Delay(s) 8.6 9.3 8.9 8.9 Approach LOS A A A A Delay O.A. HCM Level of Service A intersection'Capacity Utilization 32 HE 1CU Level of'Servlce A` Analysis Period(min) 15 No-Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 J HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St 014, t Lane Configurations ,, Sign:Conroy Sip; Sip Stop Step Volume(vph) 8 28 33 42 69 10 41 63 13 17 72 22 Peak Hour Factor £}44 0 69 fl 50 D,85 0,67 0;67 Q63 0,71 Q92 Q46 064 0 8 Hourly flow rate(vph) 18 41 66 49 103 15 65 89 14 37 112 38 E Volume Total(vph) 125 167 168 187 Volume Left(vph). 18 49 M 37 Volume Right(vph) 66 15 14 38 FIadJ{s): -0.25 0.04 9 06 05 Departure Headway(s) 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.8 - beg"Utilization:.x 0.171 0.23 013 0.25 Capacity(veh/h) 684 665 679 695 - Control I?elay{sj' 8,7 9.5 9:4 9.4 Approach Delay(s) 8.7 9.5 - 9.4 9.4 Approach LOS A A A A Delay 9:3 HCM Level of Service A lntersectirr Capaaty Utilization 32.4°7o ICU Level A of Serui�:e - Analysis Period(min) 15 No-Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. Kok- Lane Configurations To T+ 4 Volume(vph) 38 44 8 9 53 9 '' 1°0 111 84 13 305 47 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total'Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0` 4:0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 Frt 1.00 0;98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93. 100 085 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1820 1770 1813 1770 1728 1857 1683 Fit Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 841 IS20 1316 1813 776 1728 1818 16,83 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.56 0.72 0.56 0.63 0.99 0.80 0.46 0.75 0.72 Adj.Flow(vph) 66 66 12 16 74 16 16 11.2 105' 28 4.07 65 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 10 0 0 13 0 0 33 0 0 0 25 Lane Group Flow.(vph) 66 68 0 16 77 0 16 184 0 0 435 40 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2'` 6 Permitted Phases 4 g _ 2 6 -6 Actuated Green,G(s) 133 117 7.3 7.3 48.3 48.3 430 43.0 Effective Green,g(s) 13.7 13.7 7.3 7.3 48.3 48.3 43.0 43.0 Actuated;g/.Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.69 0.69 0.61 0 61 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension is), 3;0 3.0 3.0 "! 3.0 3.0: 3.0 34 10 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 196 356 137 189 554 1192 1117 972 v/s Ratio Prot c0;01 004 0.04 0.00 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.01 0.02 c0.24 0.03 v/c Ratio 0;34 0.19 0.12 0.41 ©03 0.15 0;39 0.04 Uniform Delay,d1 23.6 23.5 28.4 29.3 3.9 3.8 6.8 5.3 Progression Factor 1.00 100 9.00 1.00 1.00 1.00` 1.00 1:d0 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.1 Delay(s) 24.7 23.8 28:8 30.8 4.0 4.017:9 5:4 Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 24.2 30.5 4.0 7.6 Approach LOS C C A A HCM Average Control Delay 11.6 HCM Level of Service B H.GM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection.Capacity Utilization 42 0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group No-Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hilt Rd.&Chapel Rd. I a Lane Configurations , Sign-Corrfil' Stop . Stop Stoptflr Volume(vph) 12 111 18 5 44 10 20 86 16 18 58 7 Peak Hour Factor M50 01, U5 Q 0;65 Q8.3 0:71 fly8� ��� 0;�'i Q: fl 0.4A Hourly flow rate(vph) 24 137 24 8 68 16 28 97 24 32 100 16 F. Volume Total(vph) 185 92 149 148 Volume Left(vph 24 & 28 32 Volume Right(vph) 24 16 24 16 _ - Hadj(s) 402 4,05 ;.02 a:01 Departure Headway(s) 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 Degree Utilization,x 0,24 0.12 0.20 0:20 Capacity(veh/h) 709 686 709 699 control Delay(s) ! 9 3 &Z &0 &0 Approach Delay(s) 9.3 8.5 8.9 9.0 - Approadh L©S A !A A A Delay 9 0 HCM Level of Service intersecti©n:Ca sty lJtilization 24 8°l0 ICU Level of Service A' No-Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St NFL Lane Configurations ,, Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume(vph) 15 53 8 30 41 3 38 104 30 1 71 9 Peak Hour Factor 0:50 0-711 M4 0.68 0.71 0.38 0.53 0,69 0.84 0.25 0 74 0;44 Hourly flow rate(vph) 30 75 18 44 58 8 72 151 36 4 96 20 €max T1 Imo_ 1 7 Volume Total v( ph) 123 110 258 120 Volume Left(vph) "30 44 72 4 Volume Right(vph) _ 18 8 36 20 Hadj(s) -0.01 0.07 0.01 -0.06 Departure Headway(s) 5.0 5.1 4.7 4.8 Degree Utilization,x 0.17 0.15 0.33 0.16 Capacity(veh/h) 661 648 735 701 Control Delay(s)' 9.0 9..0 10.0 8.7 Approach Delay(s) 9.0 9.0 10.0 8.7 Approach LOS A A A A seoot '�mr aim....,, - _ F„_ ._ Delay, 9.4 HCM Level of Service _ _ A Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 No-Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. I Lane Configurations To 4 r Volume(vph) 116 73: 16 1:7 58 18 1.7 128 95 19 483 99 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total:Lost time(s)' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0' 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1-.001 0.97 1:.001 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1801 1770 1808 1770 1741 1:858 158-3 Fit Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm): 847 1801 1258 1808 632 1741 1821 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.86 0.74 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.90 0.85 0.80 0,77 0.68 0.94 0.93 Adj.Flow(vph): 135 99 28 24 82 20 20 160 123 28 514 106 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 17 0 0 14 0 0 28 0 0 0 43 Lane Group Flow(vph) 135 110 0 24 88 0 20 255 0' 0 542 63 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases' 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 _ 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 149 1'4.9 7.7 7.7 47.1 47.1. 418 41.8 Effective Green,g(s) 14.9 14.9 7.7 7.7 47.1 47.1 41.8 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0 21 0.11 0.1 : 0.67 0.67 0:60 0 60 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) &0 310 3.0 " &0 3,01 3.0 3.0 3 0 __- Lane Grp Cap(vph) 222 383 138 199 446 1171 1087 945 Ws.Ratio Prot c0.03 0.06 0.05 0.00 c015 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.02 0.03 c0.30 0.04 vk Ratio 0.61 0.29 OX 0.44 0.04 0.22 0.50 GM Uniform Delay,d1 24.7 23.1 28.3 29.1 4.9 4.4 8.1 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 taoi 1,00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.7 0.4 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.4 1.6 0.1 Delay(s) 29.4 23.5 28:9 30:7 4.9 4.8 91 6.1' Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 26,5 30:3 4.8 9:1 Approach LOS C C q A j 9 50 HCM Average Control Delay 13.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 052 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity.Utilization 60.6% ICU level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 ..._..... . ........... ......._..._._.. c Critical Lane Group No-Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 A HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. Lane Configurations S(gn Ccittrol Sip: p p Volume(vph) 5 161 21 7 58 8 32 96 23 16 56 4 Peak Ilov--,ac 0:50 0';80 4 85 0,58 0,67 0 52 0;88 03 4 0, 08, Q5 Hourly flow rate(vph) 10 201 25 12 76 12 62 109 32 24 68 8 Volume Total(vph) 236 100 203 100 Volume Left upii} 10 12 62 24 Volume Right(vph) 25 12 32 8 402 4.01 0.00 0.03 Departure Headway(s) 4.8 5.0 4.9 5.1 Degr filization x 0,34 GA4 a28 Q 14 Capacity(vehlh) 703 661 690 649 Cortrol Delay s} - 1 Q 8;$ 9.7 s; Approach Delay(s) 10,0 8.8 9.7 8.9 Approaolt LfiS A A A A Delay ;. !9.5 HCM Level of Service A (ntersectian:Gapaty lftiliztion 286°!a ICES euel of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 No-Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 A HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St Lane Configurations Sign Confir©I Stop Stop Sty: Stop Volume(vph) 17 91 5 43 46 2 45 131 52 7 72 6 Peak.Hour Factor, 0,75 0,66 ,50 0,60 0:75 QW &n. 0. 0.79 . 0,0" 0.58 t)5 Hourly flow rate(vph) 23 138 10 72 61 4 62 142 66 11 124 12 Volume Total(vph) 171 137 270 147 Volume heft(vpit) 23 72 62 If Volume Right(vph) 10 4 66 12 l adj(s) 0,03 0.12 0.07 0.00 Departure Headway(s) 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.1 17egree Utilization,x 0.25 0 20 r.37 0.21 Capacity(vehm) 631 611 696 646 Control Delay(8) -1. 93 10.7 9:5 Approach Delay(s) 9.9 9.7 10.7 9.5 Approach L©S A A B A De 1 fl 1 HCM Level of Service B Inter�Capaaty Utilization 375°ln ICII'Level©f Servicei A Analysis Period(min) 15 No-Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 s HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. p NM Lane Configurations *T Volume NO) 27 48 21 75 106 18: 8 ' 103. 56 25 345 245 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total:°Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0` 40 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt too 0 95 1.00 0.98 1.001 0.93 160 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd,Flow(prot) 1770 1774 1770 1833 1770 1727 1854 1583 Fit Permitted 0.40 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd.Flog(perm) 737 1774 1304 1833 604 1727 1782 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.65 0.80 0.75 0.83 0.71 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.57 0.48 0.71 0.83 Adj.Flow(vph): 442 60 28 90 149 18 12 103 98 52 486 205 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 21 0 0 7 0 0 36 0 0 0 129 Lane Group Flow-(vph) 42 67 0 90 160 0 12 165 0' 0 538 166 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 17.7 17.7 1:1.3 11.3 44.3 44.3 39.4 39, Effective Green,g(s) 17.7 17.7 11.3 11.3 44.3 44.3 39.4 39.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0 25 0.16 0.16 0.63 0.63 US 0.66 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension{s) 3 0 &0 3:0 3,0 3. &. 30 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 222 449 211 296 397 1093 1003 891 Ws Ratio Prot 0 01 c0 04 C0.09 0.00 ct110 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.07 0.02 c0.30 0.10 jl Wd Ratio 0,19 0.15 OA31 0.54 0.03 OAS 0 54 0.19 Uniform Delay,dl 20.3 20.3 26.4 27.0 6.0 5.2 9.6 7.5 Progression Factor 1.00 100 9,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.4 0.2 1.4 2.0 0.0 0.3 2.1 0.5 Delay(s) 2027 20:5 27 8 29 0 6.0 5;5 116 7.9 Level of Service C C C C A A B A Approach Delay(s) 20.5 286 5.5 10,3 Approach LOS C C A B HCM Average Control Delay 13.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Larne Group Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis :r CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. iz w- Lane Configurations „ O Cot trcil' Sfiop stop Stop l p Volume(vph) 4 69 43 42 136 20 46 53 31 8 85 10 Leak hlour Facter 0;25 0 78 0 80: 0.50 fl 90 Q 7t fl 66 ' 0 67 0:88' 0 44 Hourly flow rate(vph) 16 88 54 84 151 28 70 79 35 18 113 17 Volume Total(vph) 158 263 484 149 Voiurrre Left(vpb 16 8-4 -0 t8 Volume Right(vph) 54 28 35 17 Wad)(s) 415 0 03 -0.01 401 Departure Headway(s) 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 Degree Utilization x 0.22 037. O; 7 022 Capacity(veh/h) 651 665 622 618 Contrt�I Delay(s) 9 5 t .0 110:11 9 8 Approach Delay(s) 9.5 11.0 10.1 9.8 approach LOS A B. B A Delay 102 HCM Level of Service B Itersecti Capacity U#Iiznfion 379°lo I:CU Level of'Seruice` A Analysis Period(min) 15 I� i Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St i1 Lane Configurations 4# Sigr�.Confrol Step Volume(vph) 102 28 33 42 69 10 41 83 13 17 88 98 Peak Hour Facfor 0 44 0.6f. 0.5fl 485 0.67 467 463 i 0,71' 0,92 0,46 0:64 0,58 Hourly flow rate(vph) 232 41 66 49 103 15 65 117 14 37 138 169 Volume Total(vph) 338 167 196 343 Volume Left(vph) 232 49 , 6 37 Volume Right(vph) 66 15 14 169 Had�(s) 005 0.04 0.06 424 Departure Headway(s) 5.9 6.3 6.2 5.6 Degree Ufil€zalhon,z 0.561 0.29 0:34 454 Capacity(veh/h) 558 496 515 594 Control i?eiay(s) 16;1 11.9 12.4 15.0 Approach Delay(s) 16.1 11.9 12.4 15.0 ...................._.._.__...... Approach LOS C B B C belBy 14.4 HCM Level of Service B IntersectQn:Capa*Utilization 40;1°la ICU Level of ServiceA Analysis Period(min) 15 Build Conditions-AM Peak Hour. September 2011 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. mk- Lane Configurations + , Volume(vph) 38 45 8 24 73 11 10 111 113 14 305 47 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4..0 4,0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0: 4,0 4.0 Lane Util,Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1`00 0,98 1:.001 0.98 '" 1.00 0.92' 1100 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flaw(pit) 1770 1820 1770 1817 1770 1707 1856 1583 Fit Permitted 0.44 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 812 11820 1314 1817 762 1707 1809 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.56 0.72 0.56 0.63 0.99 0.80 0.46 0.75 0.72 Adj.Flow(vph): 66 6.7 12 43 101 20' 16 112 141 30 4f17 65 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 9 0 0 11 0 0 46 0 0 0 26 Lane Group Flow(vph) 66 70 0 43 110 0 16 207 01 0 437 39 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Penn Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 14,8 14.8 844 8.4 47.2 47.2: 41.9 41.9 Effective Green,g(s) 14.8 14.8 8.4 8.4 47.2 47.2 41.9 41.9 Actuated g-1C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.12 0,12 0.67 0,67' 0.60 0 60 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) &0 3.0 &0 320 3 0 3 0 30 &0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 205 385 158 218 533 1151 1083 948 v/s Ratio Prot c0,01 ON c0:06 0,00 c0.12' v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.03 0.02 c0.24 0.02 We Ratio 0.32 0618 0.27 OM 0A3 0,18 0.40. 0 04 Uniform Delay,d1 22.8 22.6 28.0 28.8 4.3 4.2 7.4 5.8 Progression Factor. 1:00 100 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00,` 1:00 100 Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.2 0.9 1.8 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.1 Delay(s) 233 22;9i 29:0 30:7 4.4 4.6 816 5.9 Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 232 30:2 4.6 81 Approach LOS C C A A HCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 429% ICU Level of Service A; Analysis Period(min) 15 i c Critical Lane Group Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. Lane Configurations Sign Control: Stop Stop Stop' Stap Volume(vph) 14 116 36 25 48 10 39 91 39 18 62 8 Peale Hotrr.Factor 0.50 0,81 175 U,63 0,65 U3 OJI; 0.89 O:B7 0,56 OZ8 0 44 Hourly flow rate(vph) 28 143 48 40 74 16 55 102 58 32 107 18 1 .I 1 1 � Volume Total(vph) 219 129 215 157 Volume Left(vph) 2$ 40 55 32 Volume Right(vph) 48 16 58 18 Hadj(s) -007 002 -0.08 0.01 Departure Headway(s) 5.0 5.2 5.0 5.1 Degree utilization,x 030 019 030 0.22 Capacity(vehm) 666 627 665 643 Control Delay(s) 1-0A 9.4 10.0 R 6 Approach Delay(s) 10.1 9.4 10.0 9.6 Approach LOS B. A B A ,77 Delay 9.9 HCM Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 30 5% ICU'Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis " CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St. Lane Configurations sign:Control Stop Stop Stop: Volume(vph) 82 53 8 30 41 3 38 118 30 1 88 87 Peak He r.F to 0 50 0.71 8;44 0,68' . 0,71 fl 38 Q 53 0,69 �.84 0 25 0:74 0 4 Hourly flow rate(vph) 164 75 18 44 58 8 72 171 36 4 119 198 77 4ry�LL , ,. Volume Total(vph) 257 110 278 321 Whalne L,eit(vph) 164 44 72 4 Volume Right(vph) 18 8 36 198 Hadj(s) 0,12 007 0,01 -0.33 Departure Headway(s) 5.9 6.1 5.6 5.2 ,Degree Utilization,x a42 019 0.43 0.46 Capacity(veh/h) 562 494 598 650 Control Delay(s) 13.0 10.5 92:7 12.5 Approach Delay(s) 13.0 10.5 12.7 12.5 Approach LOS B B B B I?elegy 12;5 HCM Level of Service B Itersecti4n:Capacity Utilization 419°� ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 'I Build Conditions-PM School Peak H September 2011 ,A HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 11:Chapel Rd.&Ellington Rd. . ' ..... I is B1 I*. ,a.. , W$T Lane Configurations ' Volume{vph) 116. 73 16 22 64 19 17 128 102 19 483 99 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 'total:Lost time(s) 4.0 4.01 a 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1:.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 OM: 1'00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot),' 1770 1801 1770 1810 1770 1736 1858 1583 Fit Permitted 0.45 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 839 IS01 1258 18101 630 1736 1820 1583 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.86 0.74 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.77 0.68 0.94 0.93 Adj.Flow(vph) 135 99 28 31 90 21 20 160'' 132 28 514 106 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 17 0 0 14 0 0 31 0 0 0 43 Lane Group Flowj(vph) 135 110 0 31 97 0 20 261 0 0 542 63 Turn Type Reserved NA Perm NA Reserved NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2;, 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(a) 15,1 15.1 7.9 7.9 46.9 46.9' 416 41.6 Effective Green,g(s) 15.1 15.1 7.9 7.9 46.9 46.9 41.6 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 OM 0.11 0.11 0.67 0.67 0.59 0.59 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4"0 Vehicle Extension;(s), 3.0 34 34 3.0 &0 3.0 30 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 224 389 142 204 443 1163 1082 941 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0 06 0.06 0.00 COAS v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.02 0.03 c0.30 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.60 0 28 0.22 0;47 0.05 0.222 0 50: 0.07 Uniform Delay,d1 24.6 22.9 28.2 29.1 4.9 4.5 8.2 6.0 Progression Factor 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 100 Incremental Delay,d2 4.5 0.4 0.8 1.7 0.0 0.4 1.7 0.1 Delay(s) 291 23.3 29.0 ;30:8 5.0 4.9 99 6.1 Level of Service C C C C A A A A Approach Delay(s): 26.3 30.4 4.9 9,3 Approach LOS C _C q, - A w HCM Average Control Delay 13.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0;52 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60 6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 - c' Critical Lane Group Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 w HCM Unsignalized. Intersection Capacity Analysis Y CREC International Magnet School 12:Long Hill Rd.&Chapel Rd. • Lane Configurations , Sign:Gontrol Stop' Stop Stop stop: Volume(vph) 6 163 26 12 59 8 38 98 30 16 57 4 Peak Hour i=actor 0 50° 0,80: M 0,58 0.76 0,67 0.52 0,88_ 0,72 0,67 0 82 0,50 Hourly flow rate(vph) 12 204 31 21 78 12 73 111 42 24 70 8 -7717 Volume Total(vph) 246 110 226 101 Volume Left(vph) 12 21: 73 24 Volume Right(vph) 31 12 42 8 Had1(s) -003 0.01 -0.01 0.03 Departure Headway(s) 4.9 5.1 4.9 5.2 Degree Utilization,x 0 33 0.16 U1 0,15 Capacity(veh/h) 690 643 682 631 Control Delay(s)'; 10.3 9:0 1.0 9A Approach Delay(s) 10.3 9.0 10.2 9.1 Approach LOS B. A B A Delay 9.9 HCM Level of Service q Intersection"Capacity Utilization 30 3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 I Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis CREC International Magnet School 13:Long Hill Rd.&Burnham St. Lane Configurations Sign Control' Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume(vph) 33 91 5 43 46 2 45 134 52 7 77 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.66 0.50 0:60 0.75 0.50 0.73 0.92. 0.79 0.63 0.58 0.50 Hourly flow rate(vph) 44 138 10 72 61 4 62 146 66 11 133 60 m .�. > ;� �. r ; Volume Total(vph) 192 137 273 204 Volume Left(vph) 44 72 62" 11" Volume Right(vph) 10 4 66 60 Hadj(s) 0.05 0.1"2 -0.07 -0.13 Departure Headway(s) 5.4 5.6 5.1 5.1 Degree Utilization,x 0.29 0.21 0:39 a29 Capacity(veh/h) 604 578 656 648 Control Delay(s) 1:0.6 10.1 11.2 10.2 Approach Delay(s) 10.6 10.1 11.2 10.2 Approach LOS B B B B �.Delay HCM Level of Service g Intersection"Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Build Conditions-PM Peak Hour September 2011 1K CM ' :SEP `I5 ZQ11 OR KAWIM DEPT. grnegratad ' services Civil STORM DRAINAGE REPORT Structural Town of South Windsor ' Planning Department Inland Wetlands— Conservation Commission Planning and Zoning Commission ' Mechanical 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 ' Phone (860) 644-2511 Electrical CREC International Magnet School Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut ' Technology September 6, 2011 Commissioning 000 407 s 1 �~ � �• 5272 asow ' ®NA%-E miaotu+n+'+ 1 50 Griffin Road South Bloomfield,CT 06002 T:860-286-9171 ' F:860-242-0236 start@bvhis.com www.bvhis.com Table of Contents Tab 1 Executive Summary 2 Site Mapping USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map Flood Map Soil Survey of Project Site 3 Hydrologic Analysis D-1 Pre Development Hydrologic Analysis Plan D-2 Post Development Hydrologic Analysis Plan Hydrologic Analysis - Pre-Development i Hydrologic Analysis - Post-Development 4 Hydraulic Analysis D-3 Post Development Hydraulic Analysis Plan D-4 Hydraulic Analysis - Post-Development Stormwater Piping Model Hydraulic Analysis - Post-Development Piping Report and Pipe Profiles Hydraulic Analysis - Time of Concentration Calculations Appendix A. Level Spreader and Emergency Spillway Calculations B. Stormwater Quality Calculations C. Geotechnical Report D. Maintenance and Operations Procedures E. Curve Number(CN) Calculations CREC International Magnet School Page 1 of 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary The proposed activity includes the construction of a new school along with associated utilities, site improvements, and storm drainage collection,detention and treatment. According to the 2008 Flood Insurance Rate Map for South Windsor, Connecticut, no flood zones are indicated for the proposed site(See tab 2 for Flood Map) The hydrologic analysis consists of two design points [Design Point 1 (DP-1) and Design Point 2 (DP- 2)] where the peak flows were analyzed for pre-development (existing condition) and post- development (proposed condition). Subarea DA-1 contributes to flows at DP-1 and Subarea DA-2 contributes to flows at DP-2.The subareas and design points are indicated on drawings D-1 and D-2, which are included in Tab 3. ' DP-1 (Subarea DA-1) In the pre-development condition Subarea DA 1 consists of approximately 11.87 acres. Stormwater ' flows overland at a gradual slope to a low lying area.The area consists of soil types A, B, and C. The proposed stormwater system in this area was designed to replicate the existing flow patterns by slowing down piped flows and allowing the stormwater to flow overland at non-erosive velocities to existing low lying areas on site. This was achieved by discharging piped flows into a rip-rap plunge pool to dissipate energy. From the plunge pool, stormwater flows over a 100' level spreader which reduces the velocity to non-erosive conditions and continues downstream to DP-1. Velocity calculations for the level spreader and a section are included in Appendix A. For the purpose of the calculation,flows into the level spreader were conservatively assumed to be at the full flow capacity of the pipe discharging into the level spreader. Grass lined swales were also utilized to convey flows overland, rather than collecting runoff in piped systems. In the post-development condition Subarea DA 1 was reduced to 9.99 acres and because the overland flow path was slightly altered, the time of concentration increased. Due to these factors stormwater flows to DP-1 were reduced for the post-development condition. Peak Flow Discharges and Volumes to Design Point 1 (DP-1) Return Pre- Pre- Time Post- Post- Time Frequency Development Development (min) Development Development (min) (yr) (cfs) Volume(CO (cfs) Volume(cf) 2 4.66 25,868 738 4.31 27,949 750 10 13.32 62,791 734 10.57 62,464 746 25 18.80 85,949 734 14.38 83,471 746 50 23.90 107,625 734_ _ 17.86 10W9 746 100 29.21 130,360 734 21.46 123,047 746 CREC International Magnet School Page 1 of 4 ' Executive Summary i Stormwater runoff will be treated using multiple measures in a "treatment train" approach. First, deep sump catch basins will allow sediments to settle out of runoff. Next, a trap hood will be installed on CB07 to prevent any large debris from being discharged downstream. Finally, an offline hydrodynamic separator will be installed upstream of the discharge into the level spreader to treat the water quality flow from the parking areas and drives. This separator is sized in accordance with ' the 2004 Connecticut Stormwater Quality Manual by The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, and water quality flow calculations are included in the Appendix B. DP-2 (Subarea DA-2) In the pre-development condition Subarea DA-2 consists of approximately 9.04 acres. Stormwater flows overland at gradual to steep slopes to a low lying wetland.The area consists of soil types A, B, C and D. In the post-development condition the area flowing to DP-2 was increased by 1.88 acres. A stormwater detention pond will be used to mitigate peak flow increases caused by the increase in area. The pond is sized to attenuate peak flows resulting from up to the 100 year storm event.A rip- rap reinforced emergency spill way was designed to safely convey flows at non-erosive velocities in the event the pond overtops, refer to the Appendix A for calculations and a section. Due to recommendations from the geotechnical engineer infiltration was not taken into account in the calculations, refer to page 6 paragraph 10 of the Geotechnical Report included in Appendix C. A sediment forebay will be placed upstream from the pond to treat run-off from the parking areas and drives. The forebay is sized to hold the water quality volume per 2004 Connecticut Stormwater Quality Manual by The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection requirements. Refer to Appendix B for calculations. Deep sump catch basins and trap hoods will also be utilized to pre-treat ' flows into the forebay. Flows from lawn areas will be diverted around the forebay via a vegetated swale. As with DP-1,the proposed stormwater system in this area was designed to replicate the existing flow patterns by slowing down piped flows and allowing the stormwater to flow overland at non-erosive velocities to existing low lying areas on site. This was achieved by discharging piped flows into a rip- rap plunge pool to dissipate energy. From the plunge pool, stormwater flows over a 50' level spreader which reduces the velocity to non-erosive conditions and continues downstream to DP-2. Velocity calculations for the level spreader and a section are included in the Appendix A. For the purpose of the calculation, flows into the level spreader were conservatively assumed to be at the full ' flow capacity of the pipe discharging into the level spreader. CREC International Magnet School Page 2of 4 Executive Summary Peak Flow Discharges and Volumes to Design Point 2 (DP-2)with Detention Return Pre- Pre- rime Post- Post- Time Frequency Development Development (min) Development Development (min) (yr) Flow(cfs) Volume(cf) Flow(cfs) Volume(cf) 2 5.94 28,851 736 3.75 43,484 724 10 13.79 62,102 734 10.21 87,387 726 ' 25 18.45 82,084 734 13.91 113,025 724 50 22.68 100,438 734 17.05 136,299 726 100 27.03 119,428 1 734 22.06 160,233 1 740 i Peak flow discharges and volumes for Design Point DP-2 without detention have been included below for reference only. Peak Flow Discharges and Volumes to Design Point 2 (DP-2)without Detention Return Post-Development Flow Post,Development Volume Time(min) Frequency(yr) without Detention (cfs) without Detention(cf) 2 9.94 42,241 732 10 20.76 85,269 732 ' 25 27.07 110,455 730 50 32.75 133,337 730 100 38.53 156,825 730 Forebay and Detention Pond Water Surface Elevations ft 2r 10r 25r 50r 100r Forebay 92.12 92.21 92.24 92.42 92.65 Detention Pond 89.85 91.26 91.94 92.39 92.65 General ' All catch basin structures shall be constructed with four foot sumps to provide sediment storage. Catch basin traps will be placed on structures at the downstream end of pipe runs to prevent debris from discharging into the level spreaders,and the sediment forebay. ' Sedimentation and soil erosion will be minimized during construction through the use of construction best management practices, such as catch basin inlet protection, silt fence, and erosion control ' blankets on sloped areas. There will be an erosion protection and sediment control plan included with the contract documents. A stormwater management operations and maintenance plan has been included in Appendix D. It -� provides tFie Owner with the necessary information for achieving optimal performance of the proposed stormwater infrastructure. CREC International Magnet School Page 3of 4 ' Executive Summary Hydraulic calculations were completed using Bentley StormCAD XM V8i, Rational Method. Pipes were sized for the 10 year storm with intensity-duration-frequency data from the CONNDOT Drainage Manual, October 2000. Refer to Tab 4 for maps and calculations. Hydrologic calculations were completed using Autodesk Inc. Hyrdaflow Hydrograph Extensions Version 6.052 TR-55 Method. Pre and Post development peak flow attenuation analysis was performed for the 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year 24 hour storm events. Rainfall data was referenced from the values published in the CT DEP Stormwater Quality Manual. Curve numbers were ' referenced from NRCS TR-55, refer to Appendix E for calculations. Conclusion In conclusion, there is a decrease in peak flow to design points DP-1 and DP-2, due to reducing the area to DP-1 and the attenuation of flow from the detention pond located in Subarea DA-2. The stormwater system replicates existing conditions by discharging stormwater onsite and allowing runoff to flow overland at non-erosive velocities, utilizing existing flow paths. The proposed development should not result in any adverse impacts to the watershed. r CREC International Magnet School Page 4of 4 Executive Summary I ,, I i I I I I I �_ _ i f � , --� i �� ;� i J ��_� j I, �'i I� i , � .�I tEyyF. Z t i7 ey ••� • I 4 ^ . . «. 6a +` � 1 �; _' � I,�`--�1; t��.� ° ♦ _ � •;fit k 4 _ ✓ - +Lei ' f L 1 _n"^ vr.' �r t • •- a� - - ,.fi" + },I e 11 _ 91 Nil 1-4 r ' PROJECT LOCATION USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP ' MANCHESTER,CT SCALE: 1:24000 Zi CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET NGVD 1929 NORTH -, - - - - - - - -JOB-NO' - 21-10-ID6 - - - - - - CLIENT' CREC International Magnet School am Te: SUBJECT: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map Ii_"IX semces Prepared By: SPW Date: 9/6/2011 Checked By: TSD t (04)2110106-CREC IMS USGS Topo Map 911/2011 2:31 PM 77 • 1 i no IF Tlootlinsurance to available in trile community, a O{HfS PANEL 0978 1 �FF 41 48 46 a National Flood Insurance Program a ( QO)6 -8620. J N c j o / ''ram."'r► .J°,i ¢ �Rv s# , .s ,k a i,- - F / '�•' ..`_ice . ,` c �_1 '3r'} �, <i MAP SCALE 1' = 500' r -. - ' :w : 1 f 260 O Boo 100 r °F ' # a � _- ,,;,, �. _ �.r _ ,' � •- - ��..; '7 war ,r <.,� ,''i' 'A� .' � y�� * '�'f`t'.'. Wit 1 - - — �' �'l �f«�• +fYf.$r„?_l. _ _ y1 wi'.. x ° 1112. a-�:.'�f �'-a-•'<Tt� _ -`�-; �°r• � ,p s4 ,-'►RR � '�' i 1�'sa• Mom_ r j - r Approximate G . limits I I t o PANEL OW y� p1� '�� �� •� f site � AOL ``a��. _ [-t �yp�.. i .r'.r✓tL"fi 1.: i_ilsA2dA . .. _ ... . _ fy. II II t. FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP x r, — HARTFORD CO + , :., N '{-Z �- "��. s_. - -._._- -- - .. i -t -._ , .w., f•*' .., ,.`�..� '*� iy �" P 1 ._ � .111i++u.. Ili'I Vl�ll If CONNECTICUT n a RII (ALL JURISDICTIONS) r ' j PANEL 386 OF 675 � �'.ti •hw � �' { .' *„., -!�.. �� .a� ;s _ � �.. I I I I I (SEE MAP INOE7C FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) �. .ve.. r 1 _ *.-1, ']f_.ag._ _- '� "( ate- .fi. a. _ �, tiJ. T 11•f il.u.1.)t L.• _ I'�II - COMM v '�W " -ems pi ;a -,t i- ., - QQAiWMrY PANEL &a�L ^S" �{.. ' � r •-. • -.a �,. .: 1 `. s -�� I� i BOU1NMq,19NNOP � R e1BRwHi7FCH0.TO1W aP am9G a9� P . nz.: �. +'. h�:ta 4, +w ''�z _�. ��:` � �:� i• '�%Kf '.',( :.�' .�,, III J�173 i I I I y _ - � � ,�! - *Y,. [ .ti•. fir. ,fy�*�*A'.� ,� '� •'1. tiTi1e-" - '. liji yt '• tea- , _ .�° , • F f j illi ��`�"ti's- _'t 1• {� .�- ,`� ��' ".t� x �� N' III�- ��e� _ �', /}„ ti - ,..,� _.S'>L`�ti"» 3.,.. �:���` ~ .. •aG — „ _ — ; % h �.e • _ _ T ���E MAP UMBER yy 09003CO3B6F �'*s„`'rw .t*ri '°"' - > r � �x . •t!7r` ?� 14a EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26,20D8 F' �. '1'. •*. I'I ' ..� z " Federal Emeigency Management Agency " �At- - `y, '` �;~'• � t .:ti,•''#• •� �w n _ AAA, � � - .� ��+'� ��_�• 3'�',�y i F +S;t��pr^�#S �';,kLt , t� r t LIP ..� 'K�l3s ]t 3i.. .{ ti Y ii- ,,�I S,ti ,SPY• .�- `� 1, ,` *r:.y■ .—� t° „ S ° � r,: .• �! - " . t��,� r TINS Is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was exhacted using F-MIT Ott Une. I Ns map does not refect changes * ra � t,'` i ^„t - _ � �• t, '� � or amendments which may have been mark;subsequent to the eta on the the latest product Information about National Flood Insurance - ti ! c* w .«--•,- .,! Program food maps bheek the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mac fema..gov I S. Y. G. 1u A4 �j S E a 7 �r I° s dip if! I i. iP Ik fl 6; Ild L 1. l� R Hydrologgic Soil Group--State of Connecticut (CREC International Magnet School) N ti 41*49 2T 41°49 26' JW 41*4612" - 41°4B 12° Map Scale:1:3,190 W printed on A aLm(8.W x 11°)sheet a A 0 40 80 180 240 aters A " Feet A 150 300 600 900 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/6/2011 OrM Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 rr �r rr rr rr r■r r rr rr rr r rr rr r� r rr rr rr r� Hydrologic Soil Group—State of Connecticut (CREC International Magnet School) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOQ Map Scale:1:3,190 if printed on A size(8.5°x 11")sheet. Area of Interest(AOI) The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Soils Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Soil Map Units measurements. Soil Ratings Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service 0 A Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov 0 Alp Coordinate System: UTM Zone 18N NAD83 0 g This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of aBID the version date(s)listed below. Soil Survey Area: State of Connecticut 0 C Survey Area Data: Version 10,Mar 31,2011 0 C/D Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 8/14/2006 0 D The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Not rated or not available compiled and digitized probably d'rtfers from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting Political Features of map unit boundaries may be evident. 0 Cities Water Features 0 Oceans Streams and Canals Transportation 4t+- Rails ,r1yp Interstate Highways oy US Routes Major Roads Local Roads USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/6/2011 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—State of Connecticut CREC International Magnet School Hydrologic Soil Group ' Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit—State of Connecticut Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 13 Walpole sandy loam D 2.3 9.2°% 21A Ninigret and Tisbury soils,0 to 5 B 0.3 1.1% percent slopes 32B Haven and Enfield soils,3 to 8 percent B 5.0 19.9% slopes 36B Windsor loamy sand,3 to 8 percent A 2.6 10.3% slopes 43A Rainbow silt loam,0 to 3 percent C 2.9 11.7% slopes 43B Rainbow silt loam,3 to 8 percent C 12.0 47.7% slopes 306 Udorthents-Urban land complex B 0.0 0.2% Totals for Area of Interest 25.2 100.0% r USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/6/2011 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 1 Hydrologic Soil Group-State of Connecticut CREC International Magnet School Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential.Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation,are thoroughly wet,and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B,C,and D)and three dual classes(A/D, B/D,and CID).The groups are defined as follows: Group A.Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands.These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D.Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential,soils that have a high water table,soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group(AID, B/D, or C/D),the first letter is ' for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas.Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher ' LJSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/6/2011 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe,gown Planner Michael Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works Prom: Jeffrey Doolittle,Town Engineer 60 Date: 9/29/11 RE; Application 11-29P CREC Magnet School, Chapel Road and Long Hill Rd Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above application and we have the following comments. 1. The crosswalk and handicap sidewalk ramps across the driveway off Chapel Road should both be moved south between the curb line of Chapel Road and the stop bar. The ramps should face across the proposed driveway. A second ramp will be needed for the crosswalk across Chapel Road. 2. A keep right sign should be added to direct traffic one way around the island in front of the building. I suggest signs be added to direct traffic coming down the driveway from Long Hill Road to only turn right onto the main driveway from Chapel Road at the island. This will reduce conflicts with busses and other vehicles. 3. Shouldn't the fence along the top of the western retaining wall be 4 feet high? 4. Should there be a concrete or stone dust path to the future play area to the south IT west of the building? 5. Include handicap ramps where sidewalks end at driveways such as south of the building heading toward the dumpster pad, and east of the school where the sidewalk ends at the eastern most parking spaces. 6. Add stop signs where the driveways from the parking lots meet the main driveway between Chapel Road and Long Hill Road (2 locations). 7. Add signs on the driveway from Long Hill Road directing cars into the student drop off area 8. There appear to be spaces for about 5 cars in the student drop off area. Where will other cars line up while they are waiting to drop off students so they do not block parking lots and traffic flow on the driveways? 9. A narrative of the traffic flow through the site during drop off and pick up times should be submitted. 10. The slope area that is shown between Chapel Road and the front parking lots should be regraded so water is directed to the west and not to the road by a shallow swale. A low berm could be put in this area. r i 20. The road cuts in both Chapel Road and Long Hill Road should be made as small as possible. Street excavation permits will be needed from the Town for the two driveways and for all utility cuts in these roads. 21. The water and gas line extensions in the road could be shortened by bringing these utilities diagonally across the front parking lot just to the east of the proposed sanitary sewer, keeping a separation of at least 10 feet between these utilities. This would result in less excavation and patching in Chapel Road, and shorter utility lines. 22. The tel/data concrete manhole proposed in the driveway should be moved to either a front lawn area or to the front parking lot. This is because any work on or in this utility manhole will disrupt traffic using the main driveway from Chapel Road. 23. The sanitary sewer pipe lengths and slopes should be shown on the plans. These pipes should have at least a 2% slope. Also show the pipe invert elevations where they exit the building foundation. 24. Eliminate the bend in the sanitary sewer line to the west of SMH02. Sewer lines should only bend at manholes. 25. Provide calculations for the estimated daily and peak sewer flows from this facility. Also provide calculations for sizing the 2000 gallon grease interceptor tank. Size the sanitary sewer pipes to achieve minimum cleansing velocities of 2.5 fps. 26. WPCA review and approval is required for this site plan. 27. The stabilized construction entrances should be at least 50 feet long. 28. For concrete sidewalks the Town specifies Class F(4000 psi)concrete over at least 8 inches of processed aggregate base, and we place isolation joints every 15 feet. These plans should follow the Town standard details. 29. The Town uses processed aggregate base material and gravel sub-base material under road and parking lots. These plans need to call out these materials. 30. The Town curb details call for processed aggregate base under curbs and this should be shown on these plans. 31. The handicap sidewalk ramps should have detectable warning strips per A®A. 32. Town standard details for sanitary sewer and drainage pipe trenches, manholes, and catch basins should be copied on these plans. 33. The Traffic Impacts Analysis needs to include the existing and proposed A®T and PHV for both Chapel Road and Long Hill Road near the proposed school driveways. The last paragraph on page 1 should state that Route 30 intersects Route 5 at Exit 4 of 1-291. On the second page, Burnham Street is in East Hartford. This traffic analysis needs to be signed and stamped by a Civil Engineer licensed in r Connecticut. Please let me know if you have any questions. Page 1of1 Lipe, Michele From: Danna, Charles Sent: Thursday,September 29, 2011 10:59 AM To: Lipe, Michele Cc: 'Maria Acevedo-Burgos' Subject: CHAPEL RD STREET NUMBER ASSIGNMENT I WOULD EXPECT THE STREET NUMBER FOR THE PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE WOULD BE 625 Chapel Road The corresponding town identification code would be 18000625. Once the property has been subdivided/split map and parcel numbers will be assigned Have a sparkling day, Charlie D 9/29/2011 1 Acoustics ®Audio/Video- IT Infrastructure • Security JvfleHolden ■ • MEMORANDUM To: Fritz Morris,Perkins Eastman Date: 10/11/2011 From: Scott Petrovits Project: CREC-IMS South Windsor cc: Joe Culotta, Perkins Eastman JH# 10-1221 Subject: 1-291 Highway Noise Concerns Fritz: It is our understanding that significant concern has been raised regarding highway noise at the proposed site of the new CREC-IMS facility in South Windsor. Specifically, we understand that the concerns are focused around the potential increase in highway noise to residents near the school site due to the removal of a portion of the trees currently occupying the site. In general, foliage does not provide significant protection from airborne noise. Though it provides good visual masking, and appears to be a solid barrier, the foliage does not actually have the mass that would be needed to significantly absorb or redirect sound energy, so sound energy passes through almost completely unimpeded. To verify that the removal of foliage will not significantly affect highway noise levels for the residences closest to the highway, we performed a calculation based on highway noise data measured at the south property line of the school site. Our calculation is summarized in the attached table, designated Figure 1.Values in the table for the various forms of sound reduction,or "attenuation" (in dB per unit distance) have been calculated as per the Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control,Third Edition, by Cyril M. Harris. We approached the calculation assuming that the primary acoustical difference between the site layout before and after the school's construction was the partial removal of trees.Our assumptions are as follows: • Trees are concentrated at the north section of the school property. The remainder of the school property is occupied by low shrubbery and other ground cover. According to Harris, all low ground cover, whether it is grass or shrubbery, attenuates noise to a similar degree, so the school's planned grassy areas will attenuate as much noise ("Ground Cover" in Figure 1) as the existing low shrubbery at the south end of the school site. • The geometry and topology of the site will not change significantly as part of the school construction. Thus, the attenuation due to distance ("Divergence" in Figure 1) and due to the highway embankment and the change in height between the highway and residences ("Geometry" in Figure 1)will not change due to the removal of trees. • Not all of the existing trees on the school site will be removed, so the values for "Tree Attenuation" in Figure 1 are based on a partial reduction in the pre-construction values, based on the current site demolition plan. JaffeHolden.com Headquarters:114-A Washington Street,Norwalk,CT 06854 0 203.838.4167 Houston:4617 Montrose Boulevard,Suite C201,Houston,TX 77006 a 713.589.7018 JaffeHolden Pre-Construction(dB) Frequency(Hz) Overall 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 dBA Measured Source Level 67.9 65.4 63.8 65.8 71.5 68.8 60.1 52.2 74.4 Divergence 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 Ground Cover -8.0 -5.3 -2.2 9.2 14.0 17.4 21.1 25.2 Geometry 5.2 5.5 5.9 6.7 8.0 10.0 12.5 15.4 Tree Attenuation 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 5.1 6.6 8.1 10.1 Highway Noise at Residence 57.4 51.4 45.8 34.6 33.1 23.5 7.1 0.0 41.4 Post-Construction(dB) Frequency(Hz) Overall 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 dBA Measured Source Level 67.9 65.4 63.8 65.8 71.5 68.8 60.1 52.2 74.4 Divergence 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 Ground Cover -8.0 -5.3 -2.2 9.2 14.0 17.4 21.1 25.2 Geometry 5.2 5.5 5.9 6.7 8.0 10.0 12.5 15.4 Tree Attenuation 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.2 4.0 Highway Noise at Residence 58.6 52.9 47.6 37.0 36.2 27.5 12 0.0 43.4 CRECAMS Highway Noise Figure 1 October 11,2011 CAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION/IMS SCHOOL PARENT DROP-OFF/PICK-UP NARRATIVE AND ANALYSIS This is to describe the parent drop-off and pick-up procedures that will be followed at the IMS School and to show why these procedures will be safe and efficient and why the area provided on-site for parent pick-up and drop-off will be sufficient to handle the number of vehicles that will be on-site at any one time. Regular school hours are 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM(8:45 AM to 2:45 PM for pre-K). CREC also offers a pre-care program starting at 7:30 AM and an after-care program running until 5:30 PM. Parents using the before and after care programs arrive over extended periods of time. They park their vehicles and enter the school to drop-off or pick-up their children. CREC has never experienced any need for special drop-off or pick-up procedures for before-or after-care. The procedures described below are for students who do not use the before-or after-care programs. Parents will drop off and pick up their children at the curb located at the northern entrance to the school,near the driveway providing access to and from Long Hill Drive. Parents will be required to use that entrance only. Busses will be prohibited from using the Long Hill Road entrance. Appropriate signage will be installed for that purpose. Safety cones will be set up during this time to modify normal vehicle circulation during these periods. In the morning, security personnel and school staff will direct parent traffic. Vehicles will be instructed to queue in the driveway that intersects with Long Hill Road and to wait until they are directed to the curbside drop-off area by a staff person,who will be stationed near the intersection of the driveway and the parking lot aisle providing access to the drop-off area. Vehicles will be directed to proceed to the drop-off area in groups of five at a time (unless there are less than five vehicles queued). Several staff will meet the vehicles and assist the children out of the vehicles. That assistance will involve opening the door and removing the children from the vehicle, so that the parents will not get out of the vehicle. Other staff will then escort the children into the building. Based on CREC's extensive experience with this procedure at other schools, this process will take no more than one minute per group of 5 vehicles. For the afternoon pick up,parents will be issued large dashboard or windshield placards identifying the student(s)to be picked up by each vehicle. A staff member will be posted in the same location mentioned above,near the front of the driveway queue. That staff person will radio other staff stationed near the curbside pick-up area,where the students will be waiting for pick-up,to identify each group of students that needs to be brought curbside for pick-up. Staff will escort the appropriate children to curbside, and will assist in securing the child in the vehicle. Parents will not need to (and typically will not)park their vehicles. The pick-up process will take no more than one minute thirty seconds per group of five vehicles based on CREC's experience. CREC uses this system at other elementary schools, specifically the Montessori Magnet School located in Hartford,University of Hartford Magnet School,located in West Hartford,and the Reggio Magnet School for the Arts, located in Avon. CREC has found this system to be most effective. C:\Doc=ents and SettingAniichelerfipe%ocal SettingATemporary Internet FileAOLMMpickap-dropoff doc Several factors should be noted: • A large percentage of students use the before-care and after-care programs. That data is stated in the attached analysis. This substantially reduces the number of students arriving for regular start and dismissal times. • Parents do not all arrive at once for either drop-off or pick-up. In both cases they arrive over a thirty minute period, distributed fairly evenly. This is due to a number of factors. One is that the pre-K students start 15 minutes later and end 15 minutes earlier than the K-5 students. Another is that, for reasons unrelated to traffic, CREC affords its families flexibility concerning when children may be dropped-off or picked-up. Many CREC parents are single parent or two-earner families for whom this flexibility is especially important. Also,in the morning a certain number of children who do not use the before-care program arrive approximately 30 minutes early in order to take advantage of the breakfast program offered at CREC's elementary schools. • At least half of the students have one or more siblings at the school. Those students,arrive in any one vehicle, further reducing the number of vehicles. Since the school already exists, it is possible to arrive at reasonably precise numerical estimates as to (i)the number of students who will use parent transportation and will be dropped off and picked up at or around the regular start and dismissal times, and(ii)the number of vehicles that will be arriving on-site at those times,taking into account the percentage of students who will be siblings transported. �1e. The following analysis states these estimates, and applies them to the capacity of the driveway and the parent drop-off/pick-up area taking into account that both the drop-off and pick-up processes, as described above,will occur over a thirty minute period and will be more or less evenly distributed over those thirty minutes based on CREC's experience. This shows that the driveway has more than sufficient capacity for the number of vehicles that will use the driveway at any one time, and that vehicles will not back up onto Long Hill Road. If for any reason,however,this does become an issue, CREC will introduce fully staggered start and dismissal times to resolve any such issues. IMS PARENT PICK-UP/DROP-OFF ANALYSIS A. Vehicle Volume: Existing Conditions • 311 students total • 136 ride bus(44%) • 175 driven by parents(56%) • Of the 175 driven by parents o 66 use before-care, so in AM 109 students are dropped off during the period 8:00 —8:30. CADocuments and Settings\michelerlipe\Local Settingffemporary Internet FileAOLK3BMpickup-dropoff doc 50%are siblings in same vehicle: 109/ 1.5=73 vehicles using parent drop off during the period 8:00 to 8:30. o 83 use aftercare, so in PM 92 students are picked up during the period 2:45 —3:15 - 50%of these are siblings in same vehicle: 83 / 1.5 =55 vehicles picking up during the period 2:45 —3:15. B. Vehicle Volume: Extrapolation to New School • Ratio of existing students(311)to new(435)is 1.4. • AM regular hours drop off o 73 vehicles x 1.4= 102 vehicles during the period 8:00—8:30. • PM regular hours drop off: o 55 vehicles x 1.4=77 vehicles during the period 2:45-3:15. C. Time Anal • AM drop off: o 30 seconds per group of 5 vehicles, or 0 102* vehicles dropping off/5 =20.4 groups (roundup to 21) o 21 groups x 1 minute—21 minutes (30 minutes are available). • PM drop off: o 1.5 minutes per group of 5 vehicles o 77* vehicles picking up/5 = 15.4 groups of 5 (round up to 16) o 16 groups x 1.5 minutes=24 minutes (30 minutes are available). D. Capacity Analysis: • There is capacity on-site for 30 vehicles. (Up to 25 will be able to queue in the driveway. The pick-up/drop-off area has a 5 vehicle capacity). • Thus,there is capacity on site for 6 groups of 5 vehicles at any time. • AM pick up o In a worst case scenario, if a vehicle is the 30th vehicle on site upon arrival,that vehicle will be on site 6 minutes. (6 groups x 1 minute per group). o 30 vehicles is 30% of the 102 vehicles that will arrive over a thirty minute period. o Based on CREC's experience, 30% of the vehicles that will arrive between 8:15 and 8:45 will not arrive in the same six minute period. Arrivals will be much more evenly distributed over the thirty minutes. • PM Pick up o In a worst case scenario, if a vehicle is the 30th vehicle on site upon arrival,that vehicle will be on site 9 minutes. (6 groups x 1.5 minutes per group). o 30 vehicles is 39% of the 77 vehicles that will arrive over a thirty minute period. o Based on CREC's experience, 39%of the vehicles that will arrive between 2:45 and 3:15 will not arrive in the same nine minute period. Arrivals will be much more evenly distributed over the thirty minutes. * This does not account for absences or for parents who choose on a given day to go into the school. It is a worst case number. C.0ocuments and Settings\michelerllpelLocal Settmgs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3B3\pickup-dropoff doc ti OWN maces Civil SITE LIGHTING OPTIONS Structural Town of South Windsor Planning Department Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue Mechanical South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Phone (860)644-2511 CREC International Magnet School Electrical Chapel Road South Windsor, Connecticut Technology October 6, 2011 Commissioning 50 Griffin Road South Bloomfield,CT 06002 T:860-286-9171 F:860-242-0236 start@bvhis.com www.bvhis.com OPTION 1 COOPER LIGHTING-MESA LED LIGHTBARTm TECHNOLOGY MESA LED INVUE asar�rl:a:.yru uyvs ��i`z:apt �uwu +�• em..p.... �alw'iya+b corn. W.in.V4...m.... r+.w•e.r a. ®ts7 ,,ptp1� El _ .�` .� s .- fCf.rtii�uD.Pt�Va. �sn.•��17!���n^s �iMrt. a y�ppf�7{�� _►tom -p,,, Jr ... _ aFiP.V�� 1�`i.c. ai•- rr�+-+y T«' -r .,_ ,�. �` OplaafA.AG@IppbPbdmdm mfe+Ee..and.pm.»dhaedYta "'.�.. 1D.�y�Gs�u.Hrf�•oLg Fwd �"Iiapl7tyoq� -� fY'T9 Ci�G'W[Sy' OVWSP 30V V I 6WAB{E gIIQiQJN10Id mll{NE W71ri� a7GglR'a,9cC;' µVp'b.viv Sad MgLl.a.d».mm. aldWo6r/mw>PodIPP.^b il0vm�1NJ• t*a SM 40 01( . v. ..a. . • .. - rh.� w.. - eA.^t...+.mwp'+�+"as.•+.e..a..WaN Iq..o�ae�.ie�l op..ra �.»��� � s m.., »ro.n 1 t9. F.�++.�.e.aaylewP"A...ao e.:..Pw...r.,..4bo-.'aa��:a>•. v Qrn A.gg4an+iaaweahrryi�mA dsLm.e a2[.v..rsyN•Aai¢a.,r,......®a�. ao_rr.., 1r.N.avb4 aJmq/�mdr afy� u�eo>IdWottao'Am[.ar�.:.d.du.rp.w,.�tcl�i, S!-RA2'N Rl�rOnu eNq+1dL awnM'9Y. - e�dvnl000Dk%tlsq— 5, Amm .tivyay.p.NN.K'd.m l5QVW1 - 9....a - •.crymelve Mt�P� 16 am __901aa.TJ Ye.i ' '. •-_ )kC 1 OQ l.ety.ai. _— .lprrrer7¢}ule a:naa'w.nC4gA lkq 14a at 4V!__ ACCuLEDE)p#ics. �Ih oNxtimm®ah�e•..V".�p�II.:J[a�E���f..". Mesa LED Decorative Area LUminaire isl. 3C1.�o.a�.s.is.l!a.d NJuD�•Yme> ]! reo5!a6l.mre..lilw�i aP.rvcs.w»•...�mtlar. -ram sw- p do bm Mmb�hh dIa>�.m.oir.l4.s.at�r woraiWIHPIOSPNBifVB�N%i1�LKiFRBA@ll@�BiiP@9W�KBNHIMFMmfYdTOTfEWO�SCNABMY .ctn,.m se�.ta LI��9 L.I OPTION 2 PHELIPS LUMEC-URBAN SCAPE LED UrbanScape Designed to skillfully blend modern elegance with impressive engineering performance PHILIPS L 11 OPTION 3 LITHONIA LIGHITNG-OMERO LED ' Lithonia Lighting-The best value in lighting Page 1 of 1 rA L/ NUNJA L101i/T IOW Home Company Product Data Training Distributors Sales Sustainabllity contact it P • R t f POST TOP OMENO POST TOP LUM MIUS style IV •ems � i Versatility * .•�� HID Performanc LED Performance Constriction Adaptors rt TECNNICAL DETAILS Spec Sheets Omero Post Top Luminalre(MRP)The Omero Post Top Luminalre addresses the Illumination needs of the pedestrian. This stylish luminalre offers designers another aesthetically pleasing choice in site lighting.specifically for pedestrian level applications. This versatile luminalre carries Photometric the same cohesive design and superior performance of the Omero family and is available in a variety of Wattages and features Interchangeable and rotatable reflectors. Additional Information GWO FAMILY MRP f. Area&Site ideal for lower pole heights In pedestrian r ' Post Top spaces 70175W Metal Halide Wall Mounted • I BOW High Pressure Sodium • 70W Compact Fluorescent Bollards • 100W induction i AdcHonal Information Decorative Poles Family Brochure Family Flash Animation MRP-LED Download Flash Animation An energy saving alternative to HID post tops <Back 72W LED Package • Applfoation squlvalentto 16OW HID Type III and Type V Distributions Additional information y�} Adaptors available forexfsting Open Top and Tenon-mount poles. %iculty&ands, CONTACT US I SITE TERMS I PRIVACY POLICY 0 2011 ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING,INC. http://www.lithonia.com/M crc Webs/Omero/Omeroo—PostTop/default.asp 10/4/2011 v OPTION 4 BETA LED-THE EDGE 1 ' 1 ' ' � ' 1 1 I 1 1 1 Date: BetaLED Catalog#:ARE-EDR-5M -R4- -D- - - - - r i 4.0' 21,4' (102mm] [543mm] ' 17A'[441mm] [944mm] 3.w Notes., [98mm 2.0' [51mm I (in] [Umm]s'OR Product Family Optic Mounting #of LEDs LED Voltage Color Drive Current Factory-installed Options (x 10) Series Options Not FleldAdlusbeble Please type additional optWns to manually on the lines provided above. ARE EDR 8MI R42 13048 D 0 UL 0 SV 0 350 04aK 4300K Color Temperatures 0068 Universal Silver 350mA ElDIM 0-10V Dlmmingsa 0 080 120-277V 0 BK 135254 O F Fuseaato Dias 13UH Black 525mA III HL HI/Low(175/350/525,dual circuit input)' 1312 Universal 0 BZ 13700 O P Photocall'.10 347-480V Bronze 700mA t 3 TL Two-Level(175/525 w/Integrated sensor control)" 1334 0 PB 0TL2 Two-Level(0/350 w/Integrated sensor control)" 347V Platinum 0TL3 Two-Level(0/525 w/Integrated sensor control)" Bronze OWH white Footnotes I. IESNA Type V Medium distribution 5. Color temperature perfixture;6000K standard;minimum 70 CRI 10,Not available with all MUNI-level options.Referto multi-level spec 2. Spider mount,corner direct fits Inside 4'(101.6mm)square pole 6. Control by others sheet for availability and additional Information 3. Consisted multiple 20 LED light bars.40,60,80,and 100 LED units 7. Refer to dimming spec sheet for availability and additional 11.Refer to the multi-levet'spasshoot for availability and additional use blanks as needed In place of populated light bars Intorma#Mr infamuttta�- 4. Available on fixtures with 40-60 LEDs 8, When code dtatates fusing use time delay fuse 9. Not available when UH voltage Is selected 1 PERFORMANCE ti of Initial*(08) Initial Delivered Lumens- 8 U D Total Wall Total Total Total L Hours' 60K Haan Lumen System Wass Current Currant Current current Current 0 28o C Maintenance btce LEDs Type MediumType V Medium 4300K IlaBn 120,480V @ 120V ®236V 49 27TV @ 347V 43 400V (77°F) ®isaator' 403 3,710 04 2 1 1 47 0.40 0.21 0.19 0.15 0.12 >150.000 603 5,4'93 06 3 2 1 68 0.58 0.30 0.26 0.20 0.16 >150.000 SOs 3242 7,324 8 3 2 2 9Q 0.77 0:38 0.34 0.26 0.20 1 >150.000 93°J° 100-1 9,908 10) 1413121 9,131 10 3 3 2 111 0.95 0.47 0.42 0.32 0.24 1 >150.000 1201 11.11109 142 4 13 UP 10,9511114 4 3 2 132 1 1.15 1O:fiB 0;50 0.38 1 0.28 >150,000 40s 5,835 Q4 3 2_'i _ 5.194 04 3 2 1 70 0.57 0.29 0.26 Aa21__ 0.1$ 136 000 60srlal'125 344 a6 2 2 7,890 08 3 2- 2 1Q2 Q.87 0.44 0.39 0.30 0 22129Q00 80s 08) 4 $: 2 10,253 08 4 3' 2 133 1.14 0.56 0.49 0.39 0.29 129,00092^!01O0s871 10 4 3 2:. 12 784 t0 4 3 172 1.47 0J5 0,B7 0.51 0.38 i28,000 120645 12 4' 3 2 1$341 12 4 3, 2 204 1.7$ 0.86 0.78 0.60 0.44 128,000 i r 05 0,883 04 3 2 1 6344 04 3 2. 1 93 0.79 0.40 0.35 0,27 0,20 111;000 90°Jo0s 10,19106 4 3 2 9,393 06 3 3 2 137 1.18 0.59 0.51 0.39 0.29 111.000r recommended lumen maintenance factor data see TD-13 "For more Information on the IES BUG(Beckiight-Uptight-Glare)Rating visit www.lesna.org/PDF/Erratae/rM-15.07BugRatingsAddendum;lMt ©2011 Ruud Lighting Inc.--A Cree Company.All rights reserved.The information In this document is subject to change without notice. 9201 Washington Ave • Racine,WI 63406-3772 • 800-235-6800 • www..betaLED.com Made in the U.S.A.of U.S.and Imported parts. Meets Buy American requirements within the ARRA. LED _ �► - _ � of Vol 0 t r CREC ft*01 Air-Cooled Serb 8M8TAC ltoma:CH-1 Oty:I Tags:CH•1 224120112.49:26 PM iI LLJ mm 8 Nk-rwWon Drawing ALL WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CERTIFIED PRINTS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. Page: 2 CREC SOW Mr-Cooled Series R(TM)RTAC T E, Items:CH•I oty.I Tags:CH•I 212412011249:27 PM o U ru cvn TOPSC Mmsnston Draw>ng ALL WEIGHTS AND DIMENBIONs ARE APPROXtMATE.CERTIFIED PRINTS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. Pape: 5 f 4 .S 26 �- —45 314"} 96 BTFT discharge opening 17.000 x 19.750 17" 10" 15' © 17" 17" 17" 2 Housed tan-1ft. diameter FC,class 2 Supply fan 10 hp 460l3 Pipe Cabinet right(3) Cooling coil-4 rows Coll type UW Hosting coil-1 row Coil type 5w 8 Hood left 2 4 5 9 54 72 Return air damper left 7 0 Hood right 19 3/4 1U Housed fan-151n. diameter FC,class 1 Return fan 5 hp 460(3 0 Fan inlet bottom 18118 1 35.750 x 54.000 1 V N.P.T.EA 2 Combo filters-41n. cartridge-95%off-MERV 17" ® 253/4 9 14 QQ 38 Doors 17 width x 42 height 31 width x 41 height 10 width x 42 height 15 width x 42 height 42 26112 31" LS 314 51 51 4 02 5t 12 0 Im 37112 , 51 112 C 52 112 IV TI 12 1/2 5 4--17 6 1"N.P.T.E)d 35 314 118 256 314 z• 50141bs w....... For Inaneuvering purposes,include 0.125 inches to each ship split length for overlapping panel flange. Flange will not add to overall Installed unit length shown. OPENING AND DIMENS10NS MAYVARYFROM CONTRACT DOCUMENTS/RETURN OF APPROVED DRAWINGS CONSTMrFES ACCEPTANCE OF MESS VARIANCES/NOT TO SCALE Unit size,17 LlnhNn e:BVH-CREC School South Windsor unit Casin :2in Double Wall 1w Product group:Outdoor unit 1 A Proposal Number;:. ctual airflow:7000 afm n ral base frame:6in.irate ral base frame .AF_tU Pertom�ance Ctmate pange,.> aint:Faso intea-slate gray Sales Office: Hartford µ- - in nstalled Weight 4914.6IN 5013.7lb AirHlandgikv C Y 9 8 T b 4 3 2 1 4 _ O 6 56 3/4 Overall Elevation View: Right-Shipping splits indicated by bold outiine.-Measurements In inches For maneuvering purposes,include 0.126 Inches to each ship split length for overlapping panel flange. Flange will not add to overall Installed unit length at Pos# Module Length Weight 1 Fan section 44 1061.85 2 Controls section 24112 245.24 3 Controls section 24 5/8 256.62 4 Economizer section 62118 701.12 5 Filter section 19 315.33 6 Coil section 10 368.30 7 Access section 141/8 207.78 $ Coil section 24 5/8 716.62 9 Fan section 44 1150.85 Installed Unit Weight 5013.71 Ibs 9 8 7 r b 4 3 2 7 31" Basic Overall Plan View: Top-Measurements In inches OPENING AND DIMENSRWS MAY VARYFROMCONTRACT DOCUMENTS/RETURN OF APPROVED DRAWINGS CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCEOF THESE VARIANCES/NOT TO scAt.E Unit size:17 Job Name: BVH-CRBC School South Windsor unit Casing:21n Double we, Product ou :Outdoor un1E —Proposal Number: m Integrelbmftme:Wn.IMegralbme frame Actual airflow: 7000 cfm a g:AHU-2 Perlamartae C/fmate Cftangar' lint:Factory painted-slate gray Sales Office: Hartford buugnnreraree Wa1gK 4014.6W W3a1b AfrHandlers d FURNISHED 8 TRANE AND IN5T GASKET LED BY OTHERS ON UNIT MOUNTING SURFACE. 118� INSTAL LEDRBBYStTRAG1I-D 0 L RW o J SURFACE j_j o 3- o o UNIT ROOF CURE W.PIPE CAB.CURB UNIT RCGF CURB EXT, PIPE CAB. CURB 2 x 4 GASKET NAILER NAIL COUNTER FLASHING - ROOFING/INSULATING �. ROOF CURB MATERIAL _ FLASHING 6,IIE' 03-57 6.13' 66-120 WOODEN = h x 4 CAM NAILER ROOF INSULATION 1.4• 3,0' 03-57 RDDF Pt1lLDN 4A' 66-120 � ROOF DECK MATE14S TO ATTACH ROOF'CURB DRAIN CONKCIIUN TToY 7OOFAREµ TO BE SUPPUED N M W r L y U) r N M f! 141/2- N � 41— 2 5!8 1691/ 193 3/4 216 3/8-- 255 3/4 Detailed Plan View: Curb-Measurements in inches OPMAICI AND DNMENSNOAIS MAYVARYFROM CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IRETURNOF APPROVED DRAWINGS CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE VARIANCES I NOT TO SCALE Unit size:I? Jab Name:BVH-CREC School South Windsor Unit Casing:2in Double Wail Product group:Outdoor unit ProposW Number 'MIWai bass ftmeSh.IpteOralWeUame ctual airflow:7000 cfm 'ra s:AHU-2 Padmmance Climate Changer Paint;Factory painted-slate gray Sales Office: Hartford RWMAmWledWethC 4010 W 6010Aib AlrHandlers n LNGREENHECK Job: BVH-CREC-SOUTH WIN SOR In Air. Product Type: Make-Up Alr &atdtng value Y Mario: Mark 1 c:oROBasiNo oars AccEssoaaa to FURNACe ACCONCO JR BLOWER ACCESS DOOR BLBCTRICAL ACOM W= . EVAP CM I FILTER ACCESS DOOR COMPRESSOR IM.E'fORMPERACTUATOR ACCESS DOOR ACCHBBDOOR Front Right Isometric G6 25 52 Cl��w�F 82 " 24 GE 42 ARq�,� G � Back Left Isometric CAPS 4.6.1M CAProgram nies(x86)\CAPs%PadneABVH-CREC-SOUTH WINDSOR.gcj Page 5 Of 9 LNGREENHECK Job: BVH-.CREC#SOUTH 1l INDSOR &Afms Value In air: Product'Type: Make-Up Air Mark: Mark 1 Overview CONOMM FAN COND&U RFMJ CAN ox9trmsum 97A .. vtymti'oO0 sUm" AIR MOM 97A 4•LO 7� 77A at.a asa a&0 ACCEW ODOR COAVENS a-- CCIL I �+ M 37.0 148.t ^-mot END PLAN [41" Ram 97.0 V.0�+{ �IIPN.YAdt OX d6RH COlitRp. BWM�t tril�Fam E cm I ACCESS MA f CD/dOR . 47.0 Ii r; COMM+E88aR f' FDA" 77.4' T7.4 72.8 R0.ER8 C� 8uPYLYANt -?� WSAtHERR000 2RStt SIJPPIY AtR FlL7Ht8 1` 148.1 7" ELEVATION DISCHARGE END CAPS 4.6.1015 C-.WMram Files(x$6)1CAPS%Par1r*MVH-CREC-SOUTH WINDSOR.9cj Page 4 of 9 s • s 33l 7 xc i;50 ✓ h '£3«w ri c ,3� r N c x- {s,�� y- .� sr�,.. � � � ♦T� . s,Grs.�°rc, y s 'art s y"Yc c �, 1 Q, i• n rt * / ryr- 2". .s7.M / �'i.iA..5r t 'L as �:,,§,,> � z 'R.' ,^ n IV. E:Ro I G[�Y R E C ly 77 _i BY �i, �\.. si h a y. . r w✓� rftrzy�a���d`r t f r ✓v'9 rs 3 u, rx� 4?.E� 5*'�: v<y-L �'�'" � i ia �� � ✓. ..-r ,q. .�i �31���'r>� ��' h';, �3,p.hj,��2f- ll¢a..t 'rmt � ✓f n. ,..-•r i� 2 S � :�" i r .i �� �.rr �ti � r��k rt K } �i'F tF. NTIL A M , f MR rsy z¢', '`+•'�i yn WXo ... +Y u'F /S -X` -ng .......... ,t.S'+�-'s�u x- i» 4 <. ' .ram `V�7e x. ,n r .,>'✓�s�,. r> a s :' OWN;:x�3 t '} � �."✓ p F '= k?.'`.-e� ,a.zrrq:ie ': _ .< i,�'n aa .;; z<» Fj ;� ��^ tea- 'S '; .-,,.a: , r ■/I�,,, �■■y axr � s - .vs`. �,�7•;. �+ , -� �, nrr Yzcr- .c�`;`S. s.+._� - 1YIr:� R -"?'. � u w;,r1 » y rao.�a,.3ar'i<' ,rCRU L,a� T'. �,,, -Y2-•' <. �I : �� °,�s J��~C rr tEj .q✓ s �t � - ��-�-��,� '^<`»�✓,g�syv �xy:. ��£2S�h V`t„`- ` .'o`.' -,1 ;asS {� >Icih<'� � F �■.lV�������� �k.''�Yss{J�1>..: � Y�•�.���/�-'mot f S E h�+'�'(', r � ��'.- MRol f�.t� \� . r 2-a yu�� ■Il ,'C �?, x��,�<"iz� S• \un€ �� S��r r ■` - sz: -y ? '�y�, Sf4,. .y. H ¢�td,t.7r�.<fJ}'z y SSG f } 14� ��..�4st �;,bid r �'1; imi✓ a5' ^�4 rr rt � <, .:} 1,,... `�� -.a.jy■f6� .�■.u;+:;z't ,.-,z, .cf srCm:rax�r a r. "L i �v. f l - < i 7' f Y' � �tsr� abV, p essur 7`s R-1. i'.5 �. w tyea-a f a.;, :'4 �a}, � •r� ti s �.. ram ' •x,p�'" z r"�`-��. err${Y,Y`•:. , t5 ? Jr '\ )\ .<,.G.r�w.•�^tYE'TS"� �Sv r/. �,y, 'Ir 4 yIN 777777, ``r s.r�> � � r,/s t. �t7' {zaL•r f'z: - sr'`r`,ry, r - iY ,,.!/, �. f.. .f 'aS"'gn vvihS ?6�trY-->w, a�3ra rF9l.✓ ,C_�r � 3 - :f'.ytis.i�a,t �"'Pafm -=c`'rs - cs'�j.•,w / t ✓ trur�.✓ }yry g �2 y,71?>y r a 3_'sjv,�,; .✓�s.9' .GIC±F ,zs,r 'r -v,sa.. ,..` <<,: c xf %�:�...rGa/ s�'v. z� s�:, k� �' t� .A .u�af�,rra;,4..:< 1' ?`:b`r2:.A&�>�•.�z•,t£'}z 4r,•`;, <" Sv.•.s` �': <tr q<ss` _-yfa �.d- N, s,at7t�t,oj.r ,.,$. ctY°, <.9.� ra u=t� ?:' �.yrurc'>u�:Sf','�{.u.U'.'.,�5 fir .r ?: `' -:.y 3�. Fie" :�•t,c< i.��y� c; sr to,�""' .d2v, -'a � a;',z• -/' ?chj'..,rs£.`� �• r. �zas'`rSi;ry�� s ✓` X w zs,€ t m�aLt \<31si..au-a..S. } �,j�-z. T' 7=s > , . m�`. .fi•J. a..s s a >. ' - - �. � -�,�'f s'f. F r r E �'S•' n t �6 6s'"✓wr�?b z �C �sr'Z,5 va.!^v x. .�S 5$ sv :a [lat` �,dr rYo',Sy,'.� -�,• � �,^rf,.^`-�z`v'.<d.`.s'�''"�,,�'�v�t� �:a£ Q" r3�� 5� r� is f..�C�.�z - h Y.�.,��„S.r, �> z- al�: y;£:4frY'�, z f a n=>;3i�.�.g:'ic<-::S?<;t,<2"'"•�i:1'c4's�, `ay C'�t, �.W h. r,...'., ,�, y tirb�n„���-'�v<.,�. �Y`^:v��k�oJ r "�Zyk; $>%�,r �r zed n 5 Y f •�r,�St r ✓ ji^e,S f 's`E` 3'..>�lCrG:,.`'1i wi ry >r "�..Wit,-x` .r -� =S,s`�''SyR y .u, �cvha�§�`. t,y i`'rrxs � ,.z t n t•�``'�)1v�L,�'-3<-}��5 ✓.1: ���rs t',y.rt�y iY�`.5,. �T'z'�g...sr,> -e ht. �t s:�"�.i:'`' t:+t's. �"" r s:, �.s.-Y:_. ;s'' k` r`f' € t .-,�Gs..-- ' trts.. aY,a'r � zz'Y'e'h�.�Gw, '..;�45"<l�r� �-i ,- `'r-•, }ss'>.:'?'-/LSa' y.; Z ✓ t f:�i y�.: •ney^t�%3•s�c ':�iYFai_ .V:�i�'J? 1;&�3L:.����s�;rTF'.z'i'.. .d,�H���. �r� `5�,33��� 3-e. �'e. .kr�4`i`'•\'Sk2,+'ti<i� x.'' vF �✓s...._f 4 y7 �c ��sr�.,��=tt C .;,;.brj q r.x�r>o°k+��,�5` r�` � 'r i"��",re 3. {� s/<}�,�y..CFl`... .trkr,, w., ,F,, ,M! .rri£b < `�•4 /h 4c x'� � L t� .Na Y.i l.,yY t^°,.,�„�r fz�"l� s't�..� Ls� .i5 ? a`i�'x�.' '�N t`. c�F"' �!`. Y.,�sJ r C r N 7- •. f.: < < a'� m i s < 'Yia�> `" w�,ad�;Rtn L��� �`�� �n.�. .'•�.`.`t its r S .1 �'r k,r s - . �r of aS IM �rn i cxhrr� a ># i 4L ' 5 rr.ns' fi' r2.✓ ,}S^tz -tysx�j 'tts `�'..y y�` 7 7: ` •3f�r'v.:�fw +sa `S"'7 >a-r1zt7 S s :.rhi:. ,i}:. ?;.^ ',�n u n,�.-5.. ,�;xaiL^'l,Fir .> S .tsf`S�NN 3 � t '��'�:��Z �'✓ � 'v z � k �a t §1r slaS3y 5 M1 r.: ��,n�1.nC .v'S �r�2�x S,c�'-zIf;'.�ca�}z"`r�`N�� 2>4��z5 I i���?-.�,sr,,,�i�.�t•�N�J f`�of"M�?'\��'��� G�+.�'f -✓. '.�4S� Y- �.c �.�fcs�. r,Y r�<F,f✓<� rr !`r .{r�ww8��-:,�.�tr-E `4;,�E� Ssfr v:4,,; ,-� q;a.. ,c,.y.:�.,/; >�t. � y n"a;�. '�w.+zo` :.'�,�, �� .�;, r�. y.7.�. so3 df., y�s��: .�.- �ftr,��y%r �,.�S�ei:'�:;'»�•zb,`,�.i,.i >: �- .,:;r$,i-an " w�G r� ,r<-�,,.-�� �c,�}t ;��dy�,u ;r�`,,a,/ ��!�2 ��<S, r;��. �;��y��, ,� �C✓� Sf ,�,y.�,.� z 3^ „�,�' �l� ,f.E3 $''iA�h� -.�.,� r Y- :<S-„�k��•a�SJ,! 9g .. i'SN,vJ?� r`s fr �-..r��.r s S � �,e, �� r ,C`�'t �> s. s� ,;s` �.-,���' Z',CL. < � ��^ �^ry N3 -r�t}'�,r,.�� .e"!'�.)' :.�3 � 4 ��"T a Uzc .cT`i-S''<✓!rC�s''G r,'�s/ 4 � A:y, `' a ra,<'„ � (lei .,✓F'k„r ��F✓'�<� `�. � � ,fs z / i� r > s Ya hs ,<a-rY �2 f�r cFx h'3i rx'4•,R+ �i zx z.S" �w,j '�,- / + -,�.1`^s9'�;tcs cr c�:,�`.� '��Y ar ,t49y,4's,a;Q :> , ?�v ���;j;:! t'.,4'=S`.s�,?4.'�is;;i�:l;3 a-�•r?.v ➢.�s�:'{.A,!pi a. ,Sw 1=�,;!",pNs��,5.5�,f�..t� �,.i.u,-��-, .a�.EtY..-}:y�rs.�'z^4`1;,ilY)»�r� t� �".n`s,t}�l _.x z>�, tG ry i � '}S� lu'.N�;�vv:F..,,.r,�rYp..� 2S'n"r:�>'�,sk F.r �- � v��,. r-ti'..n y`Y�c1s C*'Y"'�C;"� s ft t;•s- f.,,�t, a�"Y,�"<(a�'3H,,,r�s,�yf,.:� %�"�� AF"y��> sx?rslr,�� y;,�p,s��t�zS,.Nc`„v�'�c. �r.. ``�:Yi� �.��vY����.tTrrrh' >k��n3•,�-F{�;L:�..s�s",.ri tt�E y„r lrF 'Z%h� aL�. ✓/y 1'r� { f -It^�;'�._gi C ,nta`..x+c;.> ;'�;,.:$i "" �, b � 'r� � 7 p -i;,;3+,rt�., -o �,<�h�:��� E }Z r�,::,u,(;•, �?..,�.3 :,,j :S.,j�G r3` r t.$;:ar.,=..b'r. �,,�,�•:,.t;M/ 3"%3"^:�. r.<+:a� w' r�U ur.`..3;�? - •>.:..,5.; -ay., .,f�a, .,:1,�v:�t.�:�. „srs'"; '�..� :t,.,.as_2._,«,s.f..<.�a.:. r ,:Sj,.T"�fr:,.r ,,.�✓:,.,5,c: YS,t,,..;,,.n:u'�.>,-„r �... ."'}'-i..7, .'..�.,<��,'� c� c%ar ..E,>:.=T�.;i %`� t 4E- . -✓z=.;z-�:=r�.a„<,ye>:>. _ tt%7�:>>'? i}j.:>ra�ra-zit rs` <�'� '�t r•Gr2'f t �� ^-z``,>I' a t�-'�i �su'v'7r;«`-;,ySn,.,'.-��,r.✓=%1...;.yG. ,:y�•\"`�.-<;�:...,.'i.!v�.C i. 3 i�E. �FLc ,F<�..5`L S'ar c.,:y�'`-i°xia i"r::.fi•:-3" � ir+,c'M.t�..��:+x X°»;r,'i)'2rle>a's-.�N-f,:.,7� �.s� .,>>,`,a%�:i5:':i is^,n���r:�Jr'v.�%. r�. .,�.r:: .ts.r_h �-r'>•r ;�:�t<.."�s ys_.,i a�.'\<s `vim +��,✓s: F ,,,�' '�.�,n�a7�,?'^ 7�.�,`,,,..�7�.<.a.Y.G;.? Gy "fir o�r t nt�fF »>;;��;:C��r�` 'e3 h�K4 .z K•s��F".�r�...�f ..,z„z�•��S F \ V yr � �,TFe"�S.dLc� �.y� ;, /h i� 'S c�`G-. h?F >�n c} Y�s2`'rr/ " f.Y� ✓.�.tx <. �.� �,.e"��,�' aF,�i�;r C \�� =vjflinr�,�,,c7�.J!$�-5..��r �`a w.� �'��✓� � �'eNr} tlat����i y fi'e r3fi' �r,AY��,<e*�, i Gbn/G __� r�.�'F'r� Y x� � Z'✓»sf'�'>>'" 'S�S" > �l ���. �f �-2<" ��5'��.,�,y`'�,;�"o ��sr�,.x'�`s� z�y<z�.�t �<a 3�j� r �✓% h ,Ff;��<���`� � ��/ `� r �` T,he�'al��'r�►� �ot`�a���,g� .r�= t��� riL�: .: •;;.•:"u;'�,.ts: .:: yry }" �'a�4; � ;; :•;: till q.;ti'^ ''k:•s. 'i•:`" .:i'•;a�i•'�,l�iY"nEi��.t`:r;T:�a '?•,.;,c,r „tyt'� rv,?.-.;,^.t•,.tlr r� ^,' •• n:•, i' ,r�•it4s•:.,:,�.,:' -:mot} '' e:y.t.::y... �' .�i'.i:i•_ _•':;1:�;)�' �;iF:.;�ii,:_:a2�'ti.'A3='m.�%i;:.>st`S '.r:S,•;:`.Y..• ,f..•kY;.?,};,:�k.'�_:5i'...: y.• •.:.;t a/.l''t' �• :.�....[ ��yi„•lY. ^T.w•:n.tlh:z'•-'.:•.: ;�% •eF 4)+ .i� Ct �. "� , htia:..f1i,,Y"-.i;.zi• fire �'> 's R^•�Y .v t„ :. 1 yDi'.�.s:`2^? nun?1t•:y a L •a s, r'•� r .,r,•i,.. �,.;�.�,,:s.c;rra-s:»r�� &,, �s,' •ri Y' .�=�'<c%�,ti�f lt'_�'i?;.;'✓:i � %:.hd-• fir,# ,�>...;:t: ?Si^'s� #���'����.,.`.�'.�'_:. '�'-"•: ''::'°'s•'< ; ..�..,�'.-`,S a.a,,��:.'�'?••`;::'• - c•:^.i"" ,tip''tt;'iµ:4.3'',/-•ic lr;,'.,+:,fy a'•,3:�a'•`i••,4, �Z, s.•s;,.{� :A :'�.S.,;Y. -+j;,T�:3.+'•rf..,.;F.:..' •`�Nk?ii,.!:rii-d,1d,T *•�t yi`f::�:14,::�i:... _\:'i{.;;�,;;y `• :};}!; _ :.,tt:,3,it `} ..,f;.,'.:�1;�•>':n .-�a,x-<7="•l,'':s:.L,,..c.; t" a.r�:=s<:• z�Y `rsr��r<f'•,c..4t.•,:F:,aaa:2v'., .$d'• �,:.Z;.3r�c'•t,.^.e:^.,.MM:.. :•.;y�:,'::S Model ERCH Energy Recovery Ventilator With Cooling & Meeting The model ERCH combines the benefits of the total Product operation is simple: energy wheel with supplemental heating and cooling. . Fresh outdoor air is pre-conditioned by the total The result Is a product that is specifically designed to enthalpy wheel,recovering a majority of the energy process 100%outdoor air to desired supply from the exhaust air. conditions. Four housing sizes provide air flow capacities from-1,800 cfm to 1Q000 cfm with external to coil section further conditions the outdoor air static pressures up to 1.5 In.wg (for requirements to desired conditions(typically near room above this performance,refer to Model ERT or APE)Q. conditions}. Single Point The Coil Section Wiring is provides supplemental standard.A cooling or heating of the disconnect outdoor air after pre- switch and low conditioning by the voltage terminal energy wheel. Tempering strip are options include chilled provided. water,direct expansion, Access Doors hot water,electric heat, provide easy and indirect gas. access to blowers,energy wheel,filters,and »oil section for ri �L US ,spection and 1 routine service. Forward Curved Blowers are mounted , MOdet ERCH shown tadth ;:'��� • ;;@��:. .on;: on Isolation bases with ! , ....:::. neoprene vibration chilled water coil ����,. } fi ' " -:,� and!»direct gas heater. Isolators standard. ';'.: :`:.gait ► i:"': Double Wall Housing is A Control Box is fumished Energy recovery wheels c artilled by the ARI Air- standard. The housing Is with motor starters for the to-Air Energy Recovery Ventilation Equipment constructed of heavy gauge supply blower,exhaust certification Standard onP i aIn atom,'accordance with ARI steel with insulation.The supply blower and wheel motors. packaged equone t may vary.Certified and exhaust side are internally Also Included is a 24 volt Ratings are available in the certified Product lined with galvanized steel. control circuit. Directory at htipJ/wwwarLorgfdlmotor[Weiv ® m Healthy Buildings:Ventilate buildings adequately Load Reduction:The energy wheel saves 3 to 4 tons without losing control of indoor humidity levels.The of cooling AND 50-60 MBH of heating for every 1,000 ERCH is capable of conditioning summer air to room cfm of outdoor air for many climates. design conditions.Also,it helps prevent overly dry Low Maintenance: winter air that can contribute to respiratory irritation. Servicing is minimal.All components have a well System Design Simplic/ty:The ERCH is designed established history of reliable operation. pacifically to provide outdoor air to the space at ASHRAF 62 Compliance: By assuring that minimum desired conditions.This effectively de-couples the outdoor air volumes are delivered to the room spaces, outdoor air load from the building load,enabling the compliance with the ASHRAE 62 Standard is clearly traditional VAV system to perform as it was Intended demonstrated. In response to building loads. 2 •.Y[/ l�l�Y ;y�i Y'�. S""`/44.' ;R 4 3 7'y-s- �� y+.t\ E q l( tfi } \.t�h $. y4 �`'o/ -�-- Z v�y 7,j���ATs`�'�`-�•���'�� /, g`L.u"„�E ? 'Yy - y \ 1. Y,s>� . ✓ �=':c>`\ l ,C,.r„y§i v,w� ��Z vc�..:%;vi; �z4�`„-�,�.�,. � .2\�,n ��,;s�U�-:" �. x a `Nfix - .Y �.�i•.���u.s.�:+��o..a„�s'�Y e��? b., .'Z'C CS @ 6 y� „c^p ;c ��• ,o$ ✓IRWIN- �a'i q 5 2h'W� - z.',�Siw, 'f;s �, �S ,,,_.r }c ri ; �� ris9<' �✓ Yi S. .� _ ,:; .ads" p -� `:.' �ZY f�S Y:�A+o�R o f .lei ° 0, l �.,If'.°? A�' ] t `--? MR i Rz SEE M .c✓.`-1 '. J:4h: ;• . �+P '�` w!rt :il+ �i�8 <, ,d 9 .�� ,., v ✓,,.,.- 4-. 't,:> 2?},r,5 �:w g, r- v' co 11ec�Y::'co o (.l ,fl., ,;# ! r :.,. .A, (. ,uk..4 �;_a.. ✓. ,,. :`�X±',_7.,,,��:•;a'.:,4prY''r jack,r.-ty,_,.5..,,7Y, -cc .`�fiYw 2 g.<< .. .��. v, +.,•, .� .,,},b� u r , o' o o dM o''" ` ,� �:.• ;. i��Lw?.7@� y tv EE R q' F ti .}?,,c/ 1 s �, �k'P F` E- 'L �t SlS 1�j ,y .�,t. .� c�j i� 1Fvtt`c,;i5 1'"5p,r 4On.-'a✓�4c Y'��,1 Al ?Su?..- .e, ;7,. �.- ;�;.�.��` s., ,k�Cw .. :Y`s'�.cE ..ti .c.. i v `<<l.�t- `'�.�n,^,�-'. `},�'4' ny, �\•., y..r', -,'fYr -;ok�;�vi-r°� � ..�,.+_,�,; r.<...�'.,ai.,r•. �''c�..�„ �:�;«a.k�",c,`���s�''-�z.;. ;,,- r �bS 3S � '�a,�;.�.�','=�.'2�:�.:'b'31y,-.a,'', �;"-e.�:c-v a,.�.a��`J�.<.;..-rF'� .,,Y ti1�.'C �., - .'` �i�F' �c^'�.' ti -x.` r.-,n.�; 'a'�s �•ar.��n 4F�� C .. $ �7/s;`✓ 's�?s��' tsmts'. ',�o-y� c�c b 1 5e�' p..a o. ...a���� „•z�;�.z ��k�s t;.'e.qi<,x�tt��,�'T �..t r�g:�5,.,�',"t� �%J�✓�'�}���^,„`-�1,. aj5�^�`�� sate��w z -}..`.�v �z ;y��j_d���`ir"�. .x y�:y„ an„ .4' .r�1 `s sy� l"y�.., ,.� �rr. 3v T"."`e ;�.� act uF��} `��l rt 6,�a��h � �y,.. ;�`tr �,,•+w u-`u'` "�,�tz�c��, ��„k, ' ,�h':nt� ���. 8 �"vi �,����`���z<.bti4,�;.r ems• `--2 F ����tr,, "��' �€�r'�%{C7����n ;x + r`�, !{1-y s�"t'� ,��, '��,�� a"r'i .'t r - s r! a •k Number one w , rFinv / ZQWn- J s-1, i �8 k f ( l.�c-""�. .L •Af V� l'; 3L 7j r \2 �- ', f,..0; :._ i::xln'ua'I:a c A+:�c 1.,:I-i l:,n; !n::i'•i�':. ..I;c'; -.-::`;: -_;. �=l'^:Ul,i,s i;3c,-,,i_ .._{,,. 1..�.. .. .. ..,....i. wit the Greonheck�^rer,si e for e.`,c rrfo�'c current imlo' mi.k;,z available Ph�1B/f�L fj PEG f':lib;C�.CU4FT _- Greenheck•P.Q.Box 410 Schofield,WI 54476-0410•Phone(715)359-6171 • Fax(716)355-2399•www.greenheck.com 5 11 C I1 "VI N 8 o ?du2ao,�o�i Cj 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE v SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 sox,co TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 Certified#70081300000145787342 September 22,2011 Capital Region Education Council Attn: David Fresk 111 Charter Oak Avenue Hartford CT 06106 RE: Appl.#11-29P—CREC International Magnet School,L007 Long Bill Road Dear Mr. Fresk: , At the September 21,2011 regular meeting,the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved Appl.#11-29P—CREC Magnet School—Long Hill&Chapel Roads—IWAICC application for the construction of an elementary magnet school, grading, parking, playing fields, stormwater, utilities and associated improvements on property located west of Long Hill Road and south of Chapel Road. Rural Residential(RR) Zone(GD),with the following conditions: 1. The final approved copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon must be submitted to the Planning Department. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning &Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The applicat°on shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability,which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on September 21, 2016. It is the landowners)/applicant(s) responsibility.to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 4. Bonds shall be collected in the amount of:$30,000 to ensure proper placement and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls and$15,000 for construction of stormwater system. . 5. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION ka��� Barbara Kelly,Vice Chairp rs BK/dt cc: Town Planner r Chief Building Official CAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE OF 1.66 ACRES FROM 1-291 DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO 1-291 RURAL RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONE - ZONE CHANGE NARRATIVE AND DISCUSSION OF SECTION 8.3(D) STANDARDS The applicant, Capitol Region Education Council ("CREC"), is a regional educational service center whose members are 35 Hartford-area school districts,including South Windsor. It has contracted to purchase approximately 14.35 acres of land abutting Long Hill Road, Chapel Road and Interstate I-291. It wishes to build on that site an early childhood and elementary magnet school to serve about 435 children, pre-K to grade 5. All but about 1.66 acres of the site is zoned either I-291 Rural Residential Overlay(RROZ) or Rural Residential (RR). Schools are permitted uses in both of these zones subject to satisfaction of the criteria for special exceptions. About 1.66 acres on the westerly edge of the site is zoned I-291 Corridor Development. CREC seeks to change the zoning of this portion of the site to/I-291 Rural Residential Overlay Zone—to conform to the zoning of the majority of the site- because a school is not a permitted use in the I-291 Corridor Development zone. The area sought to be changed is necessary for the school because of the configuration of the other portion of the proposed site. The site slopes from the high point at Long Hill Road to the west with the steepest portion at approximately the location of the zone line. This area of the site will allow for a gradual transition for any potential regarding of the site to allow for accessible egress to the school,playgrounds and parking. The proposed building location is shifted towards this area due to an existing sewer easement that runs through the middle of the site. This area of the site allows the project to meet all the program requirements, improves site layout, and will provide the necessary acreage to comply all zoning regulations. As discussed more fully below in the context of the specific standards for zone changes set forth in the regulations,the requested zone change is fully consistent with the goals of Plan of Development and Conservation and the Zoning regulations. Moreover, it promotes those goals by facilitating one of the few types of development that is recognized in both documents as particularly appropriate for this unique section of town. This area is unique because,being wedged as it is I-291 and residential areas along and near Chapel Road., it is ill-suited for both residential development and the types of larger-scale commercial uses that otherwise would be highly appropriate for land abutting interstate or other major highways. As reflected in the regulations for the zone designed specially for this unique area of town—the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone-the preferred uses in this area are limited to institutional uses (such as schools) and small- scale commercial. The small area sought to be re-zoned here is in this transitional area. Re-zoning is not only appropriate but desirable to allow better and more appropriate use of site for one of the limited preferred purposes for which most of the site is zoned. As discussed below,the Plan of Conservation and Development recognizes that the most appropriate re-zoning requests are those occurring in such transitional areas. This is a classic example of such an area, where a minor adjustment of zone boundaries is desirable to better carry out planning goals articulated in the Plan of Conservation and Development and the Zoning Regulations. A review of the specific standards for zone changes set forth in Section 8.3(D) of the Zoning regulations bears this out. Those criteria, and a discussion as to how they are satisfied,follows: 1. The goals,objectives, and recommendations of the Plan of Conservation and Development. The Plan of Conservation and Development("PCD")recognizes that the zoning regulations should provide for community public facilities to reflect the needs and wants of the community. See PCD p. 10. Schools are such facilities. Schools are also an excellent transitional use that can serve to buffer residential areas from large scale commercial and industrial uses -and also, in this case, an interstate highway. The PCD expressly addresses the benefits of zone changes in transitional areas to "mitigate incompatibilities."The PCD states, at page 14: Whenever residential uses abut industrial and commercial uses, incompatibilities tend to occur. To mitigate this effect,transitional uses are encouraged along zone boundaries.Zone changes....would occur primarily in the transition areas along zone boundaries. (emphasis added) The proposed land use map at page 15 of the PCD—consistent with the zoning map - shows the site in question as being located in just such a transition area, lying between the land to the west designated "economic development" and the land primarily to the north designated"residential." 2. The purposes of zoning and these regulations. The general overarching purpose of zoning, as provided in the enabling statute by which certain zoning powers were delegated to municipal bodies, is to promote public health, safety and welfare by limiting the uses that may be made of land. See Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 8-2; Poneliet v. Dudas, 141 Conn,413,417 (1954). The enabling statute expressly provides that one specific way zoning regulations should further these general goals is"...to facilitate the adequate provision for....schools...." Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 8- 2. As noted, schools are not only in and of themselves a type of highly beneficial use that zoning rules should facilitate;they also serve as an excellent transitional use. As such it is precisely the type of use that the regulations—and specifically the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay regulations—contemplate as uniquely appropriate for the part of town lying between the highway and the Chapel Road residential areas. As Section 5.4.1(A) aptly states: These constraints generally limit the vacant land's suitability for residential development,yet the existing character of that area generally precludes large-scale industrial and commercial development. Accordingly,the purpose of this zone is "to allow the development of small-scale commercial and institutional uses that are compatible with the residential character of the area..." (emphasis added.) The requested zone change of a small but necessary portion of this site will facilitate this goal. 3. Changes that have taken place in the rate and pattern of development and land use within the Town and adjoining communities. 2 � c As the PCD notes in its preface, South Windsor is transitioning into a"mature"community in which growth —including, especially,the residential growth that in recent decades has been the dominant feature of the town's land use profile—is slowing down due to inherent limitations. That trend, coupled with the construction of I-291,has limited the site's suitability for residential development. Yet, as noted,the site is ' also not appropriate for the type of larger-scale commercial uses that typically found on land adjacent to interstate highways. These factors make a school an ideal use. The requested zone changes are minor refinements to the zoning plan to facilitate this use. 4. The supply of land available in the present and proposed zone. There is ample vacant land in town zoned I-291 Corridor Development. While there is also vacant land zoned I-291 Rural Residential Overlay,there is relatively less, and the lack of development in this zone is in any event a reflection of the fact that,for the reasons stated above,this unique area is not well-suited for either residential or most types of commercial uses. 5. The physical suitability of the land for the proposed zone. The land in question is physically well-suited for the types of uses contemplated by the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay regulations. It contains no wetlands, is not steep, and has good access to Routes 83, 5 and I-291. The small portion currently zoned I-291 Corridor Development is necessary for the development of the site for the proposed school use, and would be at least desirable if not necessary for most if not all uses permitted in the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone. 6. The impact on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities,streets, drainage systems, and other improvements. The site has access to sewers and frontage on two town roads. Development of this site will not adversely affect existing streets, drainage systems and Town sewers. 7-10. The general character and zoning of the neighborhood/Impacts on the surrounding area/ Traffic congestions impacts/The impact on surrounding property values. As noted,most of the site is already zoned I-291 Rural Residential Overlay. That zone is already the dominant zoning classification in the immediate area of the parts of the site sought to be re-zoned. To this extent,therefore,the requested change is harmonious with existing zoning and the goals of the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone. Moreover, for all the reasons noted above,the re-zoning of a small part of the site to conform to the zoning of most of the site will facilitate a use of this land that is precisely the type of use contemplated in the PCD and the regulations to serve as a transition to buffer the residential uses to the north from the interstate highway to the south and the commercial/industrial uses to the west. Impacts of a school, in fact,will be less than other uses that could be permitted for this site, especially the industrial and large-scale commercial uses that would be permitted in the existing I-291 Corridor Development zone. Accordingly,the requested re- zoning is highly compatible with the character of the neighborhood and the existing zoning, and will not adversely impact property values. 3 As discussed above,the re-zoning of the Rural Residential part of the site is particularly important to mitigate traffic impacts, especially to minimize the number of vehicles that will need to use the intersection of Chapel Road and Long Hill Road. This consideration would apply to any development of the site. 11. The environmental impacts. Development of this site will involve activities regulated under the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act. The proposed property change will include a relatively small segment of area that is within the 80' wetland setback, along the southwestern portion of the site. It is our opinion that the proposed development will fall into the activities regulated under the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses and Conservation Regulations. The proposed development would be designed in a manner not to adversely impact the downstream resource areas. There are no other significant environmental impacts anticipated due to development of this site. 12. The health and general welfare of the community. For all the reasons discussed above,the general welfare of the community will be advanced by development of this property for a use that advances educational opportunities while also carrying out the planning goals articulated in the PCD and the Zoning Regulations to provide for appropriate transitional uses in this area of town.A school is an ideal transitional use—one of the few uses, in fact,that is especially well-suited to this area. The requested re-zoning, as noted, is necessary and desirable for these purposes. 13. Neighborhood acceptance weighed against community needs. Especially inasmuch as the proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood—indeed,much more so than many other uses that could be permitted on this site- CREC is confident that any specific neighborhood concerns can and will be addressed at the special exception/site plan stage of the land use approval process. 14. The protection of historic factors. No areas of special historic sensitivity will be impacted by this school. The site is remote from the historic districts recognized in the PCD. See PCD p. 6. 4 Appl #11-20P, CREC Zone Change 7/26/11 Planning Department Report 1. Request for a zone change of 1.6 acres of land from the I-291 Corridor Development zone to Rural Residential Overlay Zone for property located westerly of Long Hill Road and southerly of Chapel Road. 2. The site is surrounded by I-291 Corridor Development zone to the west, Rural Residential zone to the north and Rural Residential Overlay zone to the east and south. 3. In acting upon the zone change, the Commission shall take into account the various factors favorable and unfavorable to such a change, including but not limited to: a. The goals, objectives, and recommendations of the Plan of Conservation and Development; b. The purposes of zoning and of these regulations; c. Changes that have taken place in the rate and pattern of development and land use within the Town and adjoining communities; d. The supply of land available in the present and proposed zone; e. The physical suitability of the land for the proposed zone; f The impact on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities, streets, drainage systems, and other improvements; g. The general character and zoning of the neighborhood; h. Impacts on the surrounding area; i. Traffic congestion impacts; j. The impact on surrounding property values; k. The environmental impacts; 1. The health and general welfare of the community, m. Neighborhood acceptance weighed against community needs; and n. The protection of historic factors. 4. The Town Plan depicts this area as an Economic Development area with residential areas shown to the north of the site. This area serves as a transitional area between the residential zones, the I-291 highway and potential commercial uses to the west of the site. Tim 5. The possible uses in the RR-0 zoning category include all the underlying uses of the Rural Residential zone as well as to allow the development of small-scale commercial and institutional uses that are compatible with the residential character of the area. Under the general concepts of the zone, it states "Permitted uses in this zone will be limited to low-intensity, low-customer/client turnover uses that can clearly demonstrate compatibility with residential uses without relying on heavily on buffering and screening to achieve that compatibility." 6. There currently is a 25 foot buffer requirement on the RR-O side of the zone line and that would continue to be required with the shifting of the zone line. 7. The wetlands map does not show any regulated wetlands on this particular area of the site; however there are regulated wetlands to the west of this area. 8. Public water and sewer are available to the site. 9. I would note that access to this parcel from Chapel Road through the Rural Residentially zoned land would only be allowed for uses that are allowed in the RR zone as well as the RR-Overlay zone. Section 2.4 Use of Land for Access and Parking states, "The use of residentially zoned land for access to or for parking in connection with an adjacent commercial or industrial use is not permitted." 10.Special exception and Site plan of development approval would be required prior to any commercial use or non-residential use of this site. 1 Llf this zone change is approved, the Commission must state on the record that you have found the zone change to be consistent with the plan of conservation and development. ;w CJ 3 5 t avou OR VAN Emu, low Wmw now ..s 'mm own Afto *am Now s ,ty�{p r► D007D Q - h i PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: 7/8/11 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw,Michael Gantick,Rich Bond,Walter Summers,Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau,Karl Reichle,Mark Owens, Chris Dougan, Sherry Roy, Ron Asselin, John Caldwell,Dennis Sheridan FROM: Michele Lipe,AICP,Town Planner The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 11-20P, CREC Zone Change Location: R007 Long Hill Road ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No.Acres 1.66 Zone I-291 CD to RR-0 ❑Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ® Public ❑Private Well Sewerage: ®Public ❑ Septic System Project Description: Rezone 1.6 acres to Rural Residential Overlay Zone Future Town-owned property involved? ❑Yes ❑No ❑new street(s) ❑new detention area ❑new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by 7/15/11 and return to the Planning Department. SOWco N SfA t� J T-awn O-P Sau� V&UI&)t a v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 l�Osoe•co�� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 3955 July 13, 2011 David Fresk 111 Charter Oak Hartford, CT 06141 Dear Mr. Fresk: Re: Appl # 11-20P, CREC Zone Change Please be advised that the Public Hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission in the above referenced matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Someone must be present at the hearing to represent the application. Three signs advertising the hearing must be posted on the property for ten (10) consecutive days prior to the hearing and must be clearly visible from a town street. Signs must be posted on the Long Hill frontage, Chapel Road frontage and Ellington Road frontage by Friday July 15, 2011. Signs can be obtained in the Planning Department. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe, AICP Town Planner f 4 MAYO CROWE LLC. ATTORNEYS Davld S.Hoopes CityFiace ll 860 275.6808 185 Asylum Street dhoopes0mayocrowe com Hartford,CT 06103 Admitted In Connecticut Tel: 860-275-6800 and Massachusetts Fax 860-275-6819 www.mayocrowe.com July 12,2011 Dear Property Owner: Re: International Magnet School for Global Citizenship proposed for property known as L007 Long Hill Road,owned by Jillson Faun Associates In accordance with Rules and Regulations of the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission,you are hereby notified that Capital Region Education Council has filed an application for a zone change of 1.66 acres of land,which is a portion of a property abutting yours,known as Assessor's Lot L007 Long Hill Road and will be the subject of a hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. All members of the public ate invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact the Planning Department at 644-2511,ext.252. Very truly yours, David Stpes Attorney for Applicant Enclosure MAGeneraitCRECtSouth Windsor Zoningtowners hr doo Hartford White Plains Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 { Re:International Magnet School Site Acquisition E, ®ear Mr. Kennedy, I am the parent of two students that attend the International Magnet School. My youngest is in pre-K and my oldest is entering 2"d grade. This will be our 41h year with the school. My husband and I chose the school because of affordable quality preschool,full-day kindergarten, diversity, and the International Baccalaureate theme. I am also a South Windsor resident. I continue to send my children because of the great experience we have had. t The IMS community is like a family. The parents that send their children to this school want the best for their children. They sacrifice by driving long distances or having to put their small child on a bus to a different town. The students are proud of their school. My children have had caring,effective teachers. They have made meaningful friendships with children from different towns. The school received IB certification last year, after just three years because of the staffs dedication. We have been very happy with the leadership of the principal and the Capital Region Education Council. I believe that South Windsor is a good fit for IMS. In the 9 years that I have lived here, I have found it to be a great place to raise my children. The town will benefit from having IMS built here.There will be students from South Windsor that will attend and there will also be residents that could benefit from the facilities. CREC has expressed that the town will have accessibility to the building and playing fields. It will bring families from neighboring towns who will be patrons in stores and restaurants. Being an IB school,students and staff will want to make positive contributions to the community. The site being close to 291, Route 5 and the East Hartford line,makes it both accessible for students and not intrusive to the town. Sincerely, Johanna Foley 540 Main Street South Windsor JUI, 20. 2011 12:56PM NO, 739 P.' 1 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located In two temporary facilities on 656 Silver lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. we believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons In the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: JC�•f'LC�/ f` Jl. !kt•-�-q 73'1Gt .�2.r' Address: 7� 70S .Oh .SOUR w�'—wori Signature: i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: fits L fL !i S Address: S-A t J0!j as C)"- Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: f ` � Address: Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: ' ,Ran / EWVw v 131L Address: DPI'• Signature:G"-'a � r°i - July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature 4nj de'- � /�e'� ^'z � � l i July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Dk0&"P&4'� A4.e co ICA .1 cf- 60 q�5 Name Address Sig t re G i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: &Aila -n Address: _-- Signature: i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: .✓ Address: Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, . South Windsor, for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: '� GRAN V0 Address: —7 6L ✓t r Signature: _/ July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature qc f '�Je 0`01TS � �� l��Ltol► �( 5 �v e r Z Q-V1 e. • July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signa re July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely P. ©z'-QA Name Address Signature ��CCfA�� Dl � 6� �1cS YCO c Sid t✓��t�o t ia�J r �l� . July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely ( &0 Name Address Signature Cfftva 3euvidIS J�{ me I r6x S-I- July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature L-j' July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Gad GtJf J'l Name Address Signature . July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 6S6 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely r Name Address Signature Sofa Ise soy Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: Signature: 07/10/2011 03:56 8606022700 AMS SERVICES INC PAGE 01 I Patrick�ennedy Chairperson South*Indsor planning&Zoning Commission 1540 S 4 llivan Avenue South*Indsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear M.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently ocated In two temporary facilities on 6S6 Sliver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Ha rd. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families comml ed to the school.i We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Lon Hill Road, South VV41Indsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition tot town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: ,LJN �' bt, Address: 12.� act a- , f---f' k-)rg� OLD%z>% Signatute: CI IL i i JUL-20-2011 09-44 Senior-Adult-Family Sere 8606473063 P.02 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school,currently located In two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent fadility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: TR r—,C A 4� G"MAR LCO SWROQ f� Address: QbCp Q1N t ,2 yr U,& WWDA) Cr OCP 0 2 9 Signature: �. TOTAL P.02 July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature ma( to C(YSY> C l � privk • 07/22/2011 15:50 8607576399 GHAMAS PAGE 01 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the international Magnet School. Sincerely Name: _.ss a,In C.t Gl Address: Y7�, Lk rn rAjei SL- EnLRe c Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: &u /d Address: Signature: July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely z�4 /)�A Name Address Signature C_ l °c . Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely s ` Name: ✓�-�� C� peC4 l Address: J ? ! krc.�,t ILL /I 4n 4" NIJ Signature: i i s s s i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 ' Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition i Dear Mr.Kennedy, r My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in { two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street In East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the international Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: $• 5,t.stt tiRl..� i Address: '5 2 OQO'> . Signature: 07-19-'11 09:49 FROM-Acmat 860-826-5034 T-339 P0001/0001 F-636 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: international Magnet School site Acquisition Dear Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the international Magnet School, a CREC magnet school,currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street In East Hartford. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at LC107 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut, We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons In the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name. � Mt/tdq%C,,L I Address: 9 L.GI,w EA-1 k r- as1?)n brvI'v Ur ���/�� : Signature July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature 07/22/2011 15:50 8607576399 GHAMAS PAGE 02 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the international Magnet School. Sincerely Name, ---,qA OL&u Address: C lab S.� Signature. • JUL 19. 2011 3:06PM NO, 156 P. 1 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 666 Silver lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the international Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site gcquisition on L007 long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the international Magnet School, Sincerely �A Name: _ MEL- OZA C.DiMgAI -- -- Address: 114z CQL._AV anexwi, , , YU77VAD CrIOGIO& Signature: � 0� Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely a Name: ` ( # ' EDi,,ml Address: Signatu e: t� Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: 0- Address: J Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: ��C� 8L Ne- oe . H(U±—PU(21I OC 0(0 Signature: a Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 G G� Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition l f Dear Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons In the town. l We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L00.7 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name, E bAM ADC14-+6t, -Z, Tess. l �t LJ vh'- j � Signatur� �� f i Ir f I6 (I, I gyp: l' Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons In the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: ) C� Address: c Signature: fid L7 Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely t Name: Address: � C-� 1� , 4C4 Signature: "- Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Sy—)6Y1Att' O`_) Address: � Signature: . July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. ® Sincerely Name Address Signature .uj, IV Q ( s T ( f Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: _ iQ�l � ,I-z' Address: 5�1—�IZL.T�d �J1 7,D-7- r1' j e Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: � nl," Address: Signature• a Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21-Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: 1(�� ® e Address: 3 ��� 7►� �� ®� C�-� e Signature: • Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Cr 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear-Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the international Magnet School. Sincerely. Name: V 1 l K t\`-t i L. Address: 3°t 3 u C., 12-i_, ri'0 ST r -A:2-4 i S-t tk W CK GS"t Utz f T-Q to 04 2- Signature: July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature iJuly 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. iSincerely Name Address Signature kcDyl - GC ol C �0- g ��� S Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Ca M III Q EhU1 S' Address: 4q Jw[- rs W�� CT UoO43 Signature: C ALL& ®tu o iJuly 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the international Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature &wo- ,�P�u /,g-5 ( P040� Phe-9, tYt'W1e4wN c-7-o6 q57 r i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: s Signature: i July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely ,�, t w Name: 'SQ-q 1 '6'VIY-\nS'tbY\ Address: 2-7 �)r. MP,w 1 fbyv Signature: ' i Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely ; Name: .,. 1 dw ® r Address: cQ RSan n Signature: July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature V.e 'Y)I)o CI- e July 18, 2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature n • Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: 04-� ,r'1(e tf l)JL V uc/�'w ICI ® � a Signature: LC2— Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CRECs application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: �Q` X-In Address: �lI�IIY r � r Signature: July 18,2011 Dear Chairman Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School,a CREC magnet school currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane and 21 Church Street in East Hartford.The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school.We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor,CT. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We ask that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road,South Windsor for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name Address Signature /V A &4111 -D a Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely / Name: Address: V V3 OvA I�+'��► ,�„ c , oG a� Signature: PaK Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: Av -"At ax Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: �' 2 Address: La N&A (Z Signature: Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr. Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located in two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in East Hartford. The International Magnet School is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor, and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town. We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Sac be �SUs- 2 JAIX Address: l I � Signature: Ott I Patrick Kennedy Chairperson South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CTo6o74 Re: International Magnet School Site Acquisition Dear Mr.Kennedy, My child attends the International Magnet School, a CREC magnet school, currently located In two temporary facilities on 656 Silver Lane, and 21 Church Street in Fast Hartford. The international Magnet School Is a strong community of learners and families committed to the school. We support CREC's application to locate the permanent facility at L007 tong Hill Road, South Windsor,Connecticut. We believe that the International Magnet School will be a valuable addition to the town of South Windsor,and that parents will continue to be active patrons in the town, We respectfully request that you formally approve the site acquisition on L007 Long Hill Road, South Windsor,for the International Magnet School. Sincerely Name: Address: ""' w Slgnafiur 6A bo£L-£LZ-o9s euiad wv 6o:o6 b6oz-86-1nr CAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCIL APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE OF 1.66 ACRES FROM 1-291 DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO 1-291 RURAL RESEDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONE ZONE CHANGE NARRATIVE AND DISCUSSION OF SECTION 8.3(D) STANDARDS The applicant,Capitol Region Education Council("CREC"), is a regional educational service center whose members are 35 Hartford-area school districts, including South Windsor. It has contracted to purchase approximately 14.35 acres of land abutting Long Hill Road, Chapel Road and Interstate I-291. It wishes to build on that site an early childhood and elementary magnet school to serve about 435 children, pre-K to grade 5. All but about 1.66 acres of the site is zoned either I-291 Rural Residential Overlay(RROZ)or Rural Residential(RR). Schools are permitted uses in both of these zones subject to satisfaction of the criteria for special exceptions.About 1.66 acres on the westerly edge of the site is zoned I-291 Corridor Development. CREC seeks to change the zoning of this portion of the site to/I-291 Rural Residential Overlay Zone—to conform to the zoning of the majority of the site-because a school is not a permitted use in the I-291 Corridor Development zone. The area sought to be changed is necessary for the school because of the configuration of the other portion of the proposed site. The site slopes from the high point at Long Hill Road to the west with the steepest portion at approximately the location of the zone line. This area of the site will allow for a gradual transition for any potential regarding of the site to allow for accessible egress to the school,playgrounds and parking. The proposed building location is shifted towards this area due to an existing sewer easement that runs through the middle of the site. This area of the site allows the project to meet all the program requirements, improves site layout,and will provide the necessary acreage to comply all zoning regulations. As discussed more fully below in the context of the specific standards for zone changes set forth in the regulations,the requested zone change is fully consistent with the goals of Plan of Development and Conservation and the Zoning regulations. Moreover, it promotes those goals by facilitating one of the few types of development that is recognized in both documents as particularly appropriate for this unique section of town. This area is unique because,being wedged as it is I-291 and residential areas along and near Chapel Road.,it is ill-suited for both residential development and the types of larger-scale commercial uses that otherwise would be highly appropriate for land abutting interstate or other major highways. As reflected in the regulations for the zone designed specially for this unique area of town—the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone-the preferred uses in this area are limited to institutional uses (such as schools) and small- scale commercial. The small area sought to be re-zoned here is in this transitional area. Re-zoning is not only appropriate but desirable to allow better and more appropriate use of site for one of the limited preferred purposes for which most of the site is zoned. As discussed below,the Plan of Conservation and Development recognizes that the most appropriate re-zoning requests are those occurring in such transitional areas. This is a classic example of such an area, where a minor adjustment of zone boundaries is desirable to better carry out planning goals articulated in the Plan of Conservation and Development and the Zoning Regulations. A review of the specific standards for zone changes set forth in Section 8.3(D) of the Zoning regulations bears this out. Those criteria, and a discussion as to how they are satisfied, follows: i / R B 1 1. The goals,objectives,and recommendations of the Plan of Conservation and Development. The Plan of Conservation and Development("PCD")recognizes that the zoning regulations should provide for community public facilities to reflect the needs and wants of the community. See PCD p. 10. Schools are such facilities. Schools are also an excellent transitional use that can serve to buffer residential areas from large scale commercial and industrial uses-and also,in this case,an interstate highway. The PCD expressly addresses the benefits of zone changes in transitional areas to"mitigate incompatibilities."The PCD states,at page 14: Whenever residential uses abut industrial and commercial uses, incompatibilities tend to occur. To mitigate this effect,transitional uses are encouraged along zone boundaries.Zone changes....would occur primarily in the transition areas along zone boundaries. (emphasis added) The proposed land use map at page 15 of the PCD—consistent with the zoning map- shows the site in question as being located in just such a transition area, lying between the land to the west designated "economic development" and the land primarily to the north designated"residential." 2. The purposes of zoning and these regulations. The general overarching purpose of zoning, as provided in the enabling statute by which certain zoning powers were delegated to municipal bodies,is to promote public health, safety and welfare by limiting the uses that may be made of land. See Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 8-2; Poneliet v. Dudas, 141 Conn,413,417 (1954). The enabling statute expressly provides that one specific way zoning regulations should further these general goals is"...to facilitate the adequate provision for....schools...." Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 8- 2. As noted, schools are not only in and of themselves a type of highly beneficial use that zoning rules should facilitate;they also serve as an excellent transitional use.As such it is precisely the type of use that the regulations—and specifically the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay regulations—contemplate as uniquely appropriate for the part of town lying between the highway and the Chapel Road residential areas. As Section 5.4.1(A)aptly states: These constraints generally limit the vacant land's suitability for residential development,yet the existing character of that area generally precludes large-scale industrial and commercial development. Accordingly,the purpose of this zone is"to allow the development of small-scale commercial and institutional uses that are compatible with the residential character of the area..."(emphasis added.)The requested zone change of a small but necessary portion of this site will facilitate this goal. 3. Changes that have taken place in the rate and pattern of development and land use within the Town and adjoining communities. 2 a 9 As the PCD notes in its preface, South Windsor is transitioning into a"mature"community in which growth —including,especially,the residential growth that in recent decades has been the dominant feature of the town's land use profile—is slowing down due to inherent limitations. That trend,coupled with the construction of I-291,has limited the site's suitability for residential development. Yet,as noted,the site is also not appropriate for the type of larger-scale commercial uses that typically found on land adjacent to interstate highways. These factors make a school an ideal use. The requested zone changes are minor refinements to the zoning plan to facilitate this use. 4. The supply of land available in the present and proposed zone. There is ample vacant land in town zoned I-291 Corridor Development. While there is also vacant land zoned I-291 Rural Residential Overlay,there is relatively less, and the lack of development in this zone is in any event a reflection of the fact that,for the reasons stated above,this unique area is not well-suited for either residential or most types of commercial uses. 5. The physical suitability of the land for the proposed zone. The land in question is physically well-suited for the types of uses contemplated by the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay regulations. It contains no wetlands, is not steep, and has good access to Routes 83, 5 and I-291. The small portion currently zoned I-291 Corridor Development is necessary for the development of the site for the proposed school use,and would be at least desirable if not necessary for most if not all uses permitted in the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone. 6. The impact on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities,streets,drainage systems,and other improvements. The site has access to sewers and frontage on two town roads. Development of this site will not adversely affect existing streets, drainage systems and Town sewers. 7-10. The general character and zoning of the neighborhood/Impacts on the surrounding area/ Traffic congestions impacts/The impact on surrounding property values. As noted,most of the site is already zoned I-291 Rural Residential Overlay. That zone is already the dominant zoning classification in the immediate area of the parts of the site sought to be re-zoned.To this extent,therefore,the requested change is harmonious with existing zoning and the goals of the I-291 Rural Residential Overlay zone. Moreover, for all the reasons noted above,the re-zoning of a small part of the site to conform to the zoning of most of the site will facilitate a use of this land that is precisely the type of use contemplated in the PCD and the regulations to serve as a transition to buffer the residential uses to the north from the interstate highway to the south and the commercial/industrial uses to the west. Impacts of a school,in fact,will be less than other uses that could be permitted for this site,especially the industrial and large-scale commercial uses that would be permitted in the existing I-291 Corridor Development zone. Accordingly,the requested re- zoning is highly compatible with the character of the neighborhood and the existing zoning, and will not adversely impact property values. 3 As discussed above,the re-zoning of the Rural Residential part of the site is particularly important to mitigate traffic impacts, especially to minimize the number of vehicles that will need to use the intersection of Chapel Road and Long Hill Road. This consideration would apply to any development of the site. 11. The environmental impacts. Development of this site will involve activities regulated under the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act. The proposed property change will include a relatively small segment of area that is within the 80'wetland setback,along the southwestern portion of the site.It is our opinion that the proposed development will fall into the activities regulated under the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses and Conservation Regulations. The proposed development would be designed in a manner not to adversely impact the downstream resource areas. There are no other significant environmental impacts anticipated due to development of this site. 12. The health and general welfare of the community. For all the reasons discussed above,the general welfare of the community will be advanced by development of this property for a use that advances educational opportunities while also carrying out the planning goals articulated in the PCD and the Zoning Regulations to provide for appropriate transitional uses in this area of town. A school is an ideal transitional use—one of the few uses,in fact,that is especially well-suited to this area. The requested re-zoning,as noted,is necessary and desirable for these purposes. 13. Neighborhood acceptance weighed against community needs. Especially inasmuch as the proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood—indeed,much more so than many other uses that could be permitted on this site- CREC is confident that any specific neighborhood concerns can and will be addressed at the special exception/site plan stage of the land use approval process. 14. The protection of historic factors. No areas of special historic sensitivity will be impacted by this school. The site is remote from the historic districts recognized in the PCD. See PCD p. 6. 4 m, or. SOUTH WINDS OR PLANNING DEPT. ! �> a _ram,�,.�- ��6� !;�/(t@1 ,L _ � 4 oAe U ( busof A, C4"i f 01 t„ I �Z LL ( el-\ I Les') Fir(7 6,j f fL4 61f- r Kc�lei_r, VAI&� t-/Lt�4 ( k�ort C"�CvA twig , t-&-( o l oils' io, � !( of C- J(1 V�,� 6 m y/ �-.l °'lCvpl 14 qo� 1 13 ice!o,�� F/l ISK.V i1 Cl 1 Q�"C. .{-( 1 `•°"� �°!V t`L �j a J 7 "" �(� [i 1 � 1 �( S G` �4 f e f.0 Ck T(_ _ To: South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission Re: CREC Proposal for the International Magnet Elementary School In considering this application it is important for you to know that the Historic District Commission has been studying the potential of establishing a second local historic district on Long Hill Road,which would include two houses on the National Register of Historic Places. Long Hill is a narrow and fairly difficult road to navigate and the addition of increased traffic would jeopardize the safety and ambiance of the neighborhood. Any steps to mitigate such disruption would be an improvement. Thank you, Virginia Macro, Chair Historic District Commission 87 Long Hill Road South Windsor, CT 06074 October 10, 2011 South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission I am writing to express my concerns with the proposed traffic plan for the Capitol Region Education Council (CREC) International Magnet School to be located at the southwest corner of Long Hill and Chapel Roads. I am not opposed to the school but do oppose the traffic plan. This is to be located in a predominant residential neighborhood without adequate access. This plan will destroy the rural neighborhood character of the area especially the part of Long Hill Road down to Burnham Street. This area is already a hazardous safety issue, especially during the morning and evening rush hours. This narrow two-lane local road is already under tremendous pressure as it is becoming a main artery into town. The road cannot be widen due to the 1-291 overpass bridge and the two properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within a few feet of the road. This pressure cooker of traffic will explode with the coming additions of the movie studio traffic as well. I cannot imagine how I will be able to back out of my driveway with the proposed steady flow of traffic coming up and down Long Hill Road. This road is very ill prepared to handle the proposed volume of traffic. strongly urge the Commission to reject this traffic plan and not destroy this historic residential neighborhood. There has to be a better way to provide residents of South Windsor a safe road to its future. Sin erely, r � 4 � \1 Patricio Hurtado Upe, Michele From: Gary Schultz[wconcord@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:28 PM To: Lipe, Michele Subject: Proposed Parking Facility on LongHill Rd Dear Michele, Having lived for fifteen years on LongHill Rd. I can only disagree with the idea of creating a parking facility for 200 vehicles. The Street LongHill Rd is already congested with the everyday traffic flowing from East Hartford and South Windsor. I believe a much safer solution may be to create the entrance and exits along Chapel Rd or Ellington Rd, between Chapel and Route 5. The limited space on Longhill Rd would not allow the steady flow of traffic that would be needed to accomodate 200 vehicles. With the top notch creative planners we are sure a safer and far better location could be created. Thank You Gary Carol and David Schultz 1 Upe, Michele From: Gary Schultz[wconcord@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:48 PM To: Lipe, Michele Subject: LongHill d. Parking for Projected Charter School Dear Michele, As a concerned citizen of South Windsor, the proposed parking facility on LongHill Rd needs to be reconsidered. Having lived on LongHill for over 15 years with my family and having raised a young boy from the lst grad to High School, to add 200 more vehicles twice a day will create mass confusion, let alone the dangerous situations it will create. Having complete faith in your groups abilities I feel a smarter solution at a different location, perhaps off of Elllington Rd. between Chapel and Route 5 could be a consideration. The dangerous situation involving so many vehicles will put our youth in a very dangerous place when with place when with a little more planning may solve what could turn into a dangerous situation Thank You for Your Time Gary Schultz, Carol Schultz and David Schultz 1 4W I - //` 2q P1 Page 1 of 1 Lipe, Michele From: Jacqueline Malone Umgrok@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:08 PM To: Lipe, Michele Subject: Proposed Charter School 161 Long Hill Road South Windsor, CT 06074 October 10,. 2011 Dear Michele: My home abuts the proposed location of the new charter school, and I have some serious concerns: First and foremost is traffic. I'm told that the latest estimate has upwards of 200 cars a day going in and out of that site from Long Hill Road. If you lived here, you would know that is excessive. In addition to the early-morning noise it would create, as it is getting out of my driveway can take several minutes. I fear this will create quite a disruption in our quiet neighborhood. In order to build such a entrance, they must remove the sign that cautions about deer crossing the road. I want to know what thought has been given to the impact on habitat. Where do you expect these deer to go? Such a sign was not necessary before they built the highway, and now that cramped habitat will be even smaller. I would also request that if this project goes through, the ingress be built as close to the highway as possible, and that the tree buffer between it and my property be increased to diminish the noise, to protect my privacy, and to preserve the natural beauty I now look out on. As someone who grew up here when living in South Windsor was living in the country, the thought of anything that further destroys what woodlands we have left is disturbing. These particular woodlands are especially precious to me, since my family used to own them. Thank you for your consideration. Jacqueline Malone y 10/11/2011 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Scott Bartlett Phone No. 860.830.2329 Address 625 Chappel Rd ..Site Name CREC IMS P&Z no. Owner CREC Phone No. 860.524.4078 Contractor Cutter Enterprises.... Signature of Owner / Date: tl Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) Teir Drop Island acrorss from Main Entrance into school Request to excavate&install a small circular sidewalk and new statues Reason for Change: (Why is change required) Owner request APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer Date: & Dir. of Public Wo ks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: I White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department 1 , Gary Lee Price Benson Park Sculpture Garden Loveland, Colorado 64.Circle of Peace by Gary tee Price "Circle of Peace" — (The inspiration behind the artwork in the words of Gary Lee Price) "I watched on television an interview with a former white supremacist. At age eighteen, he was imprisoned because of his violent anti-racial acts. The interview became very interesting to me as he recounted his reformation while in prison. He told how, prior to his sentence, he vehemently avoided people of other races. Simply: they were to be hated, they were to be abhorred, and they were to be despised. For a time, he was in solitary confinement. Overnight, he was placed in an environment where interaction with men of many colors and from many cultures was a welcome experience. Relationships developed. Biases subsided. Upon release from prison, he found himself free from the prejudices and bondage that previously had tied his hands and soul. Today, he takes a radical stand against such actions, like those found in his own sordid past, by speaking out in public forums. He exposes the thought process and violence of hate groups. He coaches a multi-cultural youth hockey team. This story fascinates me. The prejudice could only occur when there was no interaction. When the associations were built, the barriers were destroyed. Friendships occurred. This idea is what"Circle of Peace" represents; portraying children from all walks of life playing with and enjoying each other. The circle that the children form represents the continuum of humanity. �y]�7r ,mot � � -�'•8 ,� 1 `.� � ,s.. 1A � s r jl �. pill IS . . • r • SRE MATERIALS GENERAL NOTES: t' �va�x'rto Qiwm INIiE�trt.mC vu�"xT�sEF �E[IFait nOx.D e< W z ro LanosClPE°RA1Nxce ANo 01 AID--PLNR�M�xOSOR. .. mcs POn�E%RR DR xAxDRNLs,cuMD RNLs AxD 9tE AYExITEi ALL ae Y FN wE " .'. ncs'mlvF vAUTue w m —D— uit"ER cnorll ' SIGN SCHEDULE � SiRIP uc r0 wTCX_.. $pU1X - -_ Mc ro YEFi -- ..._ —_.._.. Aw0 YEEr ftoSTx ..Nt SDR CIxPEYENIS REFER-_-- ... - ......: FNSnNc p SioP 9GN aQ OD xci¢NRW oR<P atT(aaE<noxAu --- e eNsnl".c 10"Ri s _: Ta Frt r WDE oAJxiED. - EIEnAeL to p Lx mcPs vARxm<(rAx7 OO xD man nmx _ ..-, .. -- srov RAR —1(..m A n,e DROP aR .. .. .. .. . .. ... vE :.. AW —El ROAD ::. .. .. ._ m .. cAPPAaxxc . sro ®Au DEt,NFmE:ro LxtER m:x -'— - C. raAX GRAPHIC SCALE c%z 1-T u (:°cu a) DK­ w bYP cut Ta I I"m-w w (nnluu uxF e( Lu+s(rw ) sar aal O', tREEm r l axRPAINID p - I I' sN£ARY SEY.FM .,—L—.. 1 . w ( . Flo uo ep Ysa o,�Cu N DY J .. :. I � .. aR w I A. w¢o Perkins • Eastman au:LEIRiInuiEOa .,,A„..o Jax a a uP� I— a32Jn 3NCZ-1tl11N3GIS321 ... ,r .L� . O �Y, Y \ .. ... .... (ARv� raq 7' m D� 471717 .-._.. turf wxcros .AIK.T oEW Y Ya W �A iR.(awa YxE) EA u \CrR I(iYH�roK xArCNJ • Trt5 .9m' J uw ���'ffinnrr D n Ac Pa[. w..l e r A C>sE Y 8 X�BUtlf�PNOL�ERtt � Oi"M"S Y Demo i srz_DAL) e•Anx Acr arts Axo f I :, .I (iYFCAL) AmLINN RxCE cm \ Pnwew Tne DE aNCIE SWwC `I : mP aAP SrdiMWAIEa STdN MANADE . Caro A.D oRUNADEILA. a ra�R-AM PAD m Rro a4CYix6� \ Y wD YE ER HD AOE CREC- DN O ` INTERNATIONAL Y MAGNET SCHOOL C Y tl PROPOSED BUILDING 1 souLRCTaewa LOWER LEVEL EL YI.B' f•.10EDM N A - AM LEAT.EL 1DBJi' Q STATEPR000 V­.PHASE OF9 PROJECT NP.P:<]900.DD 31 ,q. +e DaNmNY,INL :•::!'''ii:'... SITE s MATERIALS RDEnro, APE t' PLAN IvR .l.:m.T�g Y C3 1 PRDPEarr� A R TO N,� aawYlx R= t ,� ^n�.m 1 sd N 'a8 (rro cAU .�. ® �.. .. —mm—mm�' --•---"—• EFE C3 SIDAND PERMIT 04T520t2 .. .. SAN TARY sEYER R .. x mREA TO UNDSCIT , S C ro arz unuir" .. x cKOY�wErE°Uttwux :.•• °R Nc x tx txn3rzot t 'ct AYAN<s me.Ia T �.'' . Aa s ARE ,.• � ;: - Puus(rwrc.LU 1 i 0. a � 0 E Equal Distance Both Sides , �. 2' 8" 6 2ft8" R48' 11' 4" 21811 1. Locate Domestic & Fire Lines Confirm Elevation to top of finish grade 2. Remove (2) Two trees for replanting 6„ 3. Center Circular Sidewalk in Tear drop as Shown 4. Keep q Sidewalk Equal in all dimensions ___ 5. Proposed Sidewalk with 4 x 4 WWF - as shown 24" __= ===-_-_ 6. 1 # 4 - 6" from subgrade in each turn-down --Continuous0 ===:______:_= 18" 7. Center circle to remain grass area ====== =_- 8. Light Broom finish on all concrete 9. Joint pattern to match Main Entrance 10. Confirm reveal - 4", 2" etc.. CREC IMS DRAWN BY CHECKED DATE SCALE SHEET NO. Circle of Friends - Statue SB 6/27/2014 N/A 101 A N s - 1 OD i r Zp n o n' V11' G' O_ I' N 42'6"► v 4 11'4"► cr. rn v �•,,,:. r2r.�' � .•,s'' 1. ,r.. •�-. A"",pzt CC/F f C jf MOMBOMIK How do 1 permanently or S :r install a sculpture? When installing a sculpture, we feel it is important to have the piece on hand so you can ' better see how to install it. Each sculpture has nuts welded on the bottom, to V which you can attach threaded rods. To get the exact placement of the holes, _a ,rl, put chalk or pencil lead ' around the inside of the nuts under the piece and place the _ bronze exactly where you want it to be on the rock or cement base. Tap the ��� �� '�emOntfug ZVOO �' a.row QptckwA c sculpture and the chalk will ho fall and mark the drill holes. 4_ Set bronze- Drill the holes about 1/2 inch deeper than the longest rod. Give the holes plenty of width, as some of the nuts will not likely be at a perfect right angle. Pour epoxy or quick set cement into each hole and place the sculpture. Another way to install the piece is to use a template such as a piece of paper to create an outline of the underside of the sculpture and mark where each nut is located. Place the template on the base and mark where each hole needs to be drilled for the rods. ***Please view our webs*te for further information, www.narvleeprice.com Go to the bottom of the home page, you'll see 6 hensi be details about our "FAQ's"—this will be where you may find compren bronze sculptures Change Order # 5 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: Scott Bartlett 860.830.2329 CHANGE O�t�5 CONTACT h a e I R PERSON Phone No. Address �j p 4 Site Name CREC IMS Piz No. owner C R E C Phone No. Contractor utter Enterprises Signature of Owner Date: d 1l 14 Signature of Design Engr. A&A Date: 7!4 CHANGE: (Describe location a nature f change. Include Four (4) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) Excavate and Install a Curtain drain on the Upper Field 1e into existing Underdrain system Reason for Change: (Why is change required) Water bleeding through slope is saturating the Field. Making the area difficult to drain. APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: -el-/`� Town. Engineer Date:_ Dir. of Public Wora Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: <Zci�•n�` s t��P I White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department 2" DIA. RIVER 3 f LANDSCAPE STONE -v 1'a v04 0 p w� N DEPTH TO MATCH CD EXISTING INSTALLED a PIPING 18"f(VIF) 3/4" CRUSHED STONE FILTER FABRIC o 6" PERFORATED PIPE 0 6" MIN \\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\ 41 36" v v c 0 0 5 PERFORATED PIPE EDGE DRAIN C7,g NOT TO SCALE ,�, `tNtIllUlif/bq/ c �40tf GOlUll,,,:,7 U , I 'CO r 9z 5272 Si rr Ni A t ►u���� i JOB TITLE REVISION INFO Q 50 Griffin Road South Bloomfield,CT 06002 CREC IMS 'O integrate lww .bvhi.com 71 N/" services www'bvhis.com CIVIL,STRUCTURAL,MECHANICAL, SHEET TITLE: DRAWING NUMBER ELECTRICAL,TECHNOLOGY AND COMMISSIONING PERFORATED PIPE EDGE DRAIN DETAIL JOB NUMBER SCALE DATE DRAWN BY REFERENCE DRAWING S KC-2 p 2110106 NOT TO SCALE 8/4/2014 MK C7.8 ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN M TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROPERTY BE CONSTRUCTEDALL IN ACCORDAN WITH THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR REQUIREMENTS. RE TO NOTE 3C ON COA (TYPIC \ \ PE I \ \ \ \ \ / PZ T � DO ,Q(SNNECT\ T0� EXISTING) G \ -a. \ \\ \ > \\ \K' l- W- p 1,32 A \ \\ \ > \ \ \\ PERF\QRATED N RDA SYSTEM ENE g \ \ \ PLAY FIELD. R Q IRO WI SLO]7 PE \ \ \ \ TTYI OWARD kIE �� Q12 \ \ \ \\ fry' p J. SLOP� DIRECTIONS \ \\ \\ \\ (TYPICAL) r-r i \ \ \ \ \ m i �. \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ ;1 \ \ \ \\ 5 PE RATEa PIPE EDGE\ \ \ \ \ DRA . SLOPE TWARD \ HEAD IPES AT 1 2% CO NECT \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ 1 \`` I I 1 \ 1 > \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ EX I TING\PIPt�IG I Ilk \ \t CLE N OUT �(TYP CAL) J \ \ g 0a••"'•* ''••.•• � \ JOB TITLE: REVISION :.��.0 C �' `S o,,�OG4 INFO E . 50 Griffin Road South C R E C I M S � co S•0� .*'� Bloomfield,CT 06002 mtegratedTel:(860)286.9171 N/A 7 www.bvhis.com :��, services o.15272 . SHEET TITLE: DRAWING NUMBER ®.��g`�.� CIVIL,STRUCTURAL,MECHANICAL, PERFORATED PIPE EDGE DRAIN ,,I���,'••.•CEpIS•,.•'�Cj`��� ELECTRICAL,TECHNOLOGYAND COMMISSIONING JOB NUMBER SCALE • DATE DRAWN BY REFERENCE DRAWING SK��� 2110106 1 -20 8/4/2014 MK C4.2&C4.4 0