HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07P DPI Zoning Amendment Multifamily TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
APPLICATION FORM
Application No: �j- cC1.Q
Official Receipt Date: 2-1131b'1
Receipt No:
APPLICANT: Peter R. DeMallie,Design Professionals, Inc.
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS: PO Box 1167, South Windsor, CT 06074
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS:
ADDRESS:
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY:
ASSESSOR'S MAP# PARCEL# ZONE
NAME, ADDRESS, TEL &FAX#OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED:
Peter R. DeMallie,Design Professionals,Inc., 425 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor, CT 06074
Tel, (860)291-8755,Fax(860) 291-8757
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply):
I- Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required)
r' Subdivision/Resubdivision r" Open Space Subdivision(Public Hearing Required)
I- Subdivision I-" Minor r" Major
f Resubdivision(Public Hearing Required) r"minor r Major
r Conditional Approval
r" Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required
I- Site Plan of Development
r" General Plan of Development
I- Earth Fling(Sec. 15)and/or Earth Removal(Sec. 14- Public Hearing Required)
W Regulation Amendment: W Zoning I- Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment)
I- Temporary and Conditional Permit for
r" Major Home Occupation for
r" Other(explain in detail)
An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days
prior to being heard by the Commission.
/Ja�-/.P //- 1
Si ature of App icant Signature of Property Owner
�REG'°V• Capitol Region Council of Governments
PQ`�
241 Main Street • Hartford • Connecticut • 06106
d O/'COg Telephone(860)522-2217 . Fax(860)724-1274
Z
Q www.crcog.org
� ��+ ;[ii J[
��ERNMEN� RECE AR Chairman
Lyle D. Wray,Executive Director
MAR 2 12007
MEMBERS March 16,2007 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEP1,
Andover
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ON Zoning
Avon REFERRAL
Bloomfield Town of South Windsor Z-2007-7
Bolton
Canton COMMISSIONERS:
East Granby Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mentioned referral. Notice of this proposal was
East Hartford transmitted to the Planning Division of the Capitol Region Council of Governments under the
East Windsor provisions of Section 8-3b of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended.
Ellington Proposed regulation revisions to allow mixed uses in industrial zones that are adjacent to
Enfield residential zones, in addition to commercial and office zones; and,to allow single-
Farmington family and duplex units in multi-family zones.
Glastonbury Comment: The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region
Granby Council of Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with
Hartford regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns.
Hebron Questions concerning this referral should be directed to Rebecca Augur.
Manchester
Marlborough In accordance with our procedures this letter will constitute final CRCOG action on this
Newington
referral. The public hearing date has been scheduled for TBA.
Rocky Hill DISTRIBUTION•
Simsbury Planner: Hartford,Windsor,East Windsor,Ellington,Vernon,Manchester,East
Somers Hartford
South Windsor
Suffield Respectfully submitted,
Tolland John Larensen,Chairman
Regional Planning Commission
Vernon Elaine Carey,Vice Chairman
West Hartford Regional Planning Commission
Wethersfield
Windsor Rebecca Augur
Windsor Locks Community Development Planner
A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region
Capitol Region Council of Governments
241 Main Street
og' Hartford, Connecticut 06106-5310
Telephone: (860) 522-2217 • Fax: (860) 724-1274
QO�FRNMEtv www.crcog.org
Stephen T.Cassano,Chairman
Richard J.Porth,Executive Director
ZONING REFERRAL FORM
FOR: NOTIFICATION OF REFERRALS BY ZONING COMMISSIONS OF THE CAPITOL REGION
FROM: ( )Zoning Commission
(X)Planning and Zoning Commission of South Windsor.CT
( )City or Town Council (Municipality)
(acting as Zoning Commission)
TO: Capitol Region Council of Governments
Community Development Department February 5.2007
241 Main-Street (date)
Hartford,CT 06106
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8-3(b)of the General Statutes of Connecticut,as amended,the following proposed zone change is
referred to the Capitol Region Council of Governments for comment:
NATURE OF PROPOSED CHANGE
( ) Adoption of amendment of ZONING (X) Adoption or amendment of ZONING
MAP for any area within 500 feet REGULATIONS applying to any zone
of another Capitol Region Municipality. within 500 feet of another Capitol Region
Attach map showing proposed change. Municipality. Attach copy of proposed
change in regulations.
THE CHANGE WAS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED: ( ) by municipal agency-
(Specify)
(X) by petition
PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID CHANGE IS SCHEDULED FOR: Tentatively scheduled for 3/27/05
MATERIAL SUBMITTED HEREWITH:
( ) Public Notice (X) Regulation Changes( ) Other(Specify)
( ) Map of Change ( ) Supporting Statements
HAS THIS REFERRAL BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY TO CRCOG? YES NO X
IF YES,ON WHAT DATE:
(FOR USE BY CRCOG)
Date postmarked ( thorize S'gnature)
Date Received Title
Received by Address Silo
File Number c )AX 4J1 cT tJ i u7
BY LAW,THE ZONING COMMISSION SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ITS PROPOSAL TO SUCH REGIONAL
PLANNING AGENCY NOT LATER THAN THIRTY FIVE-DAYS BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN
RELATION THERETO.
CRCOG-3/02
A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region
PLANNING DEPARMENT
IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM
DATE: 2/5/07
TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond,Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle
Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Steve Lavigueur, Chris Dougan, Bob Deptula
John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan, Ron Asselin
FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning
The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects:
Appl 07-07P, DPI Zoning Amendment -Multi—family zones
Location:
❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres Zone Multi-family
❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑Residential No. Lots/Units
Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System
Project Description: To add single family and duplexes to permitted uses in MF zones
Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ❑No
❑new street(s) ❑ new detention area
❑ new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive
Planning Department notes:
Please comment by 2/23/07 and return to the Planning Department.
Proposed Zoning Amendment
Application of Peter R DeMallie
DPI Project No. 1976
February 2,2007
4.4.2 Permitted Uses
A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only
by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations:
1. Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the
form of ownership of the land and buildings.
Proposed Zoning Amendment
Application of Peter R.DeMallie
DPI Project No. 1976
February 2,2007
4.4.2 Permitted Uses
A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only
by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations:
1.Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the
form of ownership of the land and buildings.
Proposed Zoning Amendment
Application of Peter R.DeMallie
DPI Project No. 1976
February 2, 2007
4.4.2 Permitted Uses
A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only
by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations:
1. Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the
form of ownership of the land and buildings.
N S , U
y r To� O-P S_O_ULI ?d&U1&)1t
� w J
G U
a
w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
r�OSO C0 TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 2150 0005 7640 3633
May 17,2007
Peter DeMallie
Design Professionals,Inc.
PO Box 1167
South Windsor,CT 06074
Dear Mr.DeMallie:
Re: Appl 07-07P-Zoning Amendment
We are pleased to advise you that at its meeting on May 8, 2007, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted to approve your request for a Zoning Amendment.
The following is the approved text:
4.4.2 Permitted Uses
A. Within MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only by
special exception,subject to the requirements of these regulations:
1. Single-family,duplex, and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the form
of ownership of the land and buildings. The number of single-family dwellings
shall not exceed ten percent(10%)of the total number of dwelling units.
The effective date of the Zoning Amendment was 5/12/07.
Sincerely,
Patrick Kennedy,Chair
Planning&Zoning Commission
PK/mda
May 17, 2007 CO[PV
Approved Text
4.4.2 Permitted Uses
A. Within MF zone the following uses of building and land shall be permitted
only by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulation:
1. Single—family, duplex, and multi-family dwelling units, regardless of the form
of ownership of the land and buildings. The number of single-family dwellings shall not
exceed ten percent(10%) of the total number of dwelling units.
The effective date of the Zoning Amendment was 5/12/07.
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER COP7r
SATURDAY MAY 12, 2007
SOUTH WINDSOR—PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
At its May 8, 2007, Regular Meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action:
1. Approved with modifications Appl 07-18P, DBB Management LLC—request for special exception to
article 4.1.14 and site plan approval for one duplex on property located at 36 McGuire Road(northerly
side of McGuire Road, westerly of Route 5), RR zone
2. Approved PZC-sponsored amendment to Section 5.8, Buckland Road Gateway Development Zone, to
clarify that the intent of the zone is to create developments that do not resemble typical "strip
commercial centers,"to define various terms, and to clarify distribution of parking spaces around
buildings. (effective upon publication)
3. Approved with modifications Appl 07-07P, Design Professionals, Inc. Zoning Amendment—request to
modify section 4.4.2.A.1 Permitted Uses to include single family and duplex units in Multi-family zones
(effective upon publication)
Patrick Kennedy, Chairman
Appl #07-07P, DPI Zoning Amendment:
SF and Duplexes in MF Zone
Public Hearing 4-10-07
Planning Department Report
1. Request for amendment to Section 4.4.2 of the zoning regulations. S
is the permitted uses section for Multi-Family zone. The current regulations
allow for buildings with three or more units in the MF zone;-the-eurrentzorMi T9
re
omits; and 41w,amendment would modify that to allow both duplexes and single-
family units. 5
2. The Town Plan of Conservation and Development includes a section titled On-
Going Considerations within the Implementation Actions portion of the Plan.
The On-Going Considerations include housing recommendations to:
• Continue to pursue policies that accommodate a range of housing alternatives
without sacrificing Town character,
• Be mindful of the need to maintain a cross-section of housing types and costs
when investigating alternative approaches to residential development; and,
• Address needs for moderately priced single family homes and housing for the
Town's senior citizens.
3. The Commission's own zoning regulations update includes a modification to
allow duplexes within MF zones. The addition of single family homes without
limitation into multi-family zones seems like a duplication of our existing
Designed Residence zone without the affordable housing component. The MF
zone allows a density of 4.5 units per gross acre (gross acreage excludes
generally unbuildable areas such as wetlands and waterbodies, detention areas
and utility easements, and 15+% slopes). The maximum allowable densities in
the Designed Residence zone are 2.5 units per acre with 15% affordable units,
and a sliding scale up to a maximum of 4 units per acre with 30% affordable
units.
4. One of the infrastructure impacts of this amendment would be the likely
addition of higher numbers of school children in the single family units than are
present in multi-family units. We have provided the Commission with a copy of
a recent article from the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (of which
i
South Windsor has long been a member) about the smaller number of children
generated by multi-family units vs. single-family units.
5. There should be no new environmental or traffic impacts generated by this
amendment that aren't already present with a multi-family development.
6. The Capitol Region Council of Governments has reviewed this amendment as
required and finds no apparent conflict with regional plans and policies or the
concerns of neighboring towns.
7. If the Commission approves this application, Planning Department suggests that
the Commission allow only a portion of the units in a multi-family zone to be
single-family units (say, maximum 25%).
2
30 '
.j
_.o1N�•�n�. ��