Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07P DPI Zoning Amendment Multifamily TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM Application No: �j- cC1.Q Official Receipt Date: 2-1131b'1 Receipt No: APPLICANT: Peter R. DeMallie,Design Professionals, Inc. PROJECT NAME ADDRESS: PO Box 1167, South Windsor, CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: ADDRESS: COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: ASSESSOR'S MAP# PARCEL# ZONE NAME, ADDRESS, TEL &FAX#OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie,Design Professionals,Inc., 425 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor, CT 06074 Tel, (860)291-8755,Fax(860) 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): I- Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) r' Subdivision/Resubdivision r" Open Space Subdivision(Public Hearing Required) I- Subdivision I-" Minor r" Major f Resubdivision(Public Hearing Required) r"minor r Major r Conditional Approval r" Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required I- Site Plan of Development r" General Plan of Development I- Earth Fling(Sec. 15)and/or Earth Removal(Sec. 14- Public Hearing Required) W Regulation Amendment: W Zoning I- Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) I- Temporary and Conditional Permit for r" Major Home Occupation for r" Other(explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. /Ja�-/.P //- 1 Si ature of App icant Signature of Property Owner �REG'°V• Capitol Region Council of Governments PQ`� 241 Main Street • Hartford • Connecticut • 06106 d O/'COg Telephone(860)522-2217 . Fax(860)724-1274 Z Q www.crcog.org � ��+ ;[ii J[ ��ERNMEN� RECE AR Chairman Lyle D. Wray,Executive Director MAR 2 12007 MEMBERS March 16,2007 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEP1, Andover PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ON Zoning Avon REFERRAL Bloomfield Town of South Windsor Z-2007-7 Bolton Canton COMMISSIONERS: East Granby Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mentioned referral. Notice of this proposal was East Hartford transmitted to the Planning Division of the Capitol Region Council of Governments under the East Windsor provisions of Section 8-3b of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended. Ellington Proposed regulation revisions to allow mixed uses in industrial zones that are adjacent to Enfield residential zones, in addition to commercial and office zones; and,to allow single- Farmington family and duplex units in multi-family zones. Glastonbury Comment: The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region Granby Council of Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with Hartford regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. Hebron Questions concerning this referral should be directed to Rebecca Augur. Manchester Marlborough In accordance with our procedures this letter will constitute final CRCOG action on this Newington referral. The public hearing date has been scheduled for TBA. Rocky Hill DISTRIBUTION• Simsbury Planner: Hartford,Windsor,East Windsor,Ellington,Vernon,Manchester,East Somers Hartford South Windsor Suffield Respectfully submitted, Tolland John Larensen,Chairman Regional Planning Commission Vernon Elaine Carey,Vice Chairman West Hartford Regional Planning Commission Wethersfield Windsor Rebecca Augur Windsor Locks Community Development Planner A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Main Street og' Hartford, Connecticut 06106-5310 Telephone: (860) 522-2217 • Fax: (860) 724-1274 QO�FRNMEtv www.crcog.org Stephen T.Cassano,Chairman Richard J.Porth,Executive Director ZONING REFERRAL FORM FOR: NOTIFICATION OF REFERRALS BY ZONING COMMISSIONS OF THE CAPITOL REGION FROM: ( )Zoning Commission (X)Planning and Zoning Commission of South Windsor.CT ( )City or Town Council (Municipality) (acting as Zoning Commission) TO: Capitol Region Council of Governments Community Development Department February 5.2007 241 Main-Street (date) Hartford,CT 06106 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8-3(b)of the General Statutes of Connecticut,as amended,the following proposed zone change is referred to the Capitol Region Council of Governments for comment: NATURE OF PROPOSED CHANGE ( ) Adoption of amendment of ZONING (X) Adoption or amendment of ZONING MAP for any area within 500 feet REGULATIONS applying to any zone of another Capitol Region Municipality. within 500 feet of another Capitol Region Attach map showing proposed change. Municipality. Attach copy of proposed change in regulations. THE CHANGE WAS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED: ( ) by municipal agency- (Specify) (X) by petition PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID CHANGE IS SCHEDULED FOR: Tentatively scheduled for 3/27/05 MATERIAL SUBMITTED HEREWITH: ( ) Public Notice (X) Regulation Changes( ) Other(Specify) ( ) Map of Change ( ) Supporting Statements HAS THIS REFERRAL BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY TO CRCOG? YES NO X IF YES,ON WHAT DATE: (FOR USE BY CRCOG) Date postmarked ( thorize S'gnature) Date Received Title Received by Address Silo File Number c )AX 4J1 cT tJ i u7 BY LAW,THE ZONING COMMISSION SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ITS PROPOSAL TO SUCH REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY NOT LATER THAN THIRTY FIVE-DAYS BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN RELATION THERETO. CRCOG-3/02 A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: 2/5/07 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond,Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Steve Lavigueur, Chris Dougan, Bob Deptula John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan, Ron Asselin FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 07-07P, DPI Zoning Amendment -Multi—family zones Location: ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres Zone Multi-family ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System Project Description: To add single family and duplexes to permitted uses in MF zones Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑new street(s) ❑ new detention area ❑ new open space/recreation area ❑ active ❑passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by 2/23/07 and return to the Planning Department. Proposed Zoning Amendment Application of Peter R DeMallie DPI Project No. 1976 February 2,2007 4.4.2 Permitted Uses A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations: 1. Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the form of ownership of the land and buildings. Proposed Zoning Amendment Application of Peter R.DeMallie DPI Project No. 1976 February 2,2007 4.4.2 Permitted Uses A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations: 1.Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the form of ownership of the land and buildings. Proposed Zoning Amendment Application of Peter R.DeMallie DPI Project No. 1976 February 2, 2007 4.4.2 Permitted Uses A. Within the MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulations: 1. Single-family,duplex,and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the form of ownership of the land and buildings. N S , U y r To� O-P S_O_ULI ?d&U1&)1t � w J G U a w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 r�OSO C0 TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 2150 0005 7640 3633 May 17,2007 Peter DeMallie Design Professionals,Inc. PO Box 1167 South Windsor,CT 06074 Dear Mr.DeMallie: Re: Appl 07-07P-Zoning Amendment We are pleased to advise you that at its meeting on May 8, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve your request for a Zoning Amendment. The following is the approved text: 4.4.2 Permitted Uses A. Within MF zone the following uses of buildings and land shall be permitted only by special exception,subject to the requirements of these regulations: 1. Single-family,duplex, and multi-family dwelling units,regardless of the form of ownership of the land and buildings. The number of single-family dwellings shall not exceed ten percent(10%)of the total number of dwelling units. The effective date of the Zoning Amendment was 5/12/07. Sincerely, Patrick Kennedy,Chair Planning&Zoning Commission PK/mda May 17, 2007 CO[PV Approved Text 4.4.2 Permitted Uses A. Within MF zone the following uses of building and land shall be permitted only by special exception, subject to the requirements of these regulation: 1. Single—family, duplex, and multi-family dwelling units, regardless of the form of ownership of the land and buildings. The number of single-family dwellings shall not exceed ten percent(10%) of the total number of dwelling units. The effective date of the Zoning Amendment was 5/12/07. TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER COP7r SATURDAY MAY 12, 2007 SOUTH WINDSOR—PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION At its May 8, 2007, Regular Meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action: 1. Approved with modifications Appl 07-18P, DBB Management LLC—request for special exception to article 4.1.14 and site plan approval for one duplex on property located at 36 McGuire Road(northerly side of McGuire Road, westerly of Route 5), RR zone 2. Approved PZC-sponsored amendment to Section 5.8, Buckland Road Gateway Development Zone, to clarify that the intent of the zone is to create developments that do not resemble typical "strip commercial centers,"to define various terms, and to clarify distribution of parking spaces around buildings. (effective upon publication) 3. Approved with modifications Appl 07-07P, Design Professionals, Inc. Zoning Amendment—request to modify section 4.4.2.A.1 Permitted Uses to include single family and duplex units in Multi-family zones (effective upon publication) Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Appl #07-07P, DPI Zoning Amendment: SF and Duplexes in MF Zone Public Hearing 4-10-07 Planning Department Report 1. Request for amendment to Section 4.4.2 of the zoning regulations. S is the permitted uses section for Multi-Family zone. The current regulations allow for buildings with three or more units in the MF zone;-the-eurrentzorMi T9 re omits; and 41w,amendment would modify that to allow both duplexes and single- family units. 5 2. The Town Plan of Conservation and Development includes a section titled On- Going Considerations within the Implementation Actions portion of the Plan. The On-Going Considerations include housing recommendations to: • Continue to pursue policies that accommodate a range of housing alternatives without sacrificing Town character, • Be mindful of the need to maintain a cross-section of housing types and costs when investigating alternative approaches to residential development; and, • Address needs for moderately priced single family homes and housing for the Town's senior citizens. 3. The Commission's own zoning regulations update includes a modification to allow duplexes within MF zones. The addition of single family homes without limitation into multi-family zones seems like a duplication of our existing Designed Residence zone without the affordable housing component. The MF zone allows a density of 4.5 units per gross acre (gross acreage excludes generally unbuildable areas such as wetlands and waterbodies, detention areas and utility easements, and 15+% slopes). The maximum allowable densities in the Designed Residence zone are 2.5 units per acre with 15% affordable units, and a sliding scale up to a maximum of 4 units per acre with 30% affordable units. 4. One of the infrastructure impacts of this amendment would be the likely addition of higher numbers of school children in the single family units than are present in multi-family units. We have provided the Commission with a copy of a recent article from the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (of which i South Windsor has long been a member) about the smaller number of children generated by multi-family units vs. single-family units. 5. There should be no new environmental or traffic impacts generated by this amendment that aren't already present with a multi-family development. 6. The Capitol Region Council of Governments has reviewed this amendment as required and finds no apparent conflict with regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. 7. If the Commission approves this application, Planning Department suggests that the Commission allow only a portion of the units in a multi-family zone to be single-family units (say, maximum 25%). 2 30 ' .j _.o1N�•�n�. ��