Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKryla Zoning Amendment (2) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR / PLANNING& ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION F Application No: "V t(/ RECE�V� Official Receipt Date: FEB .) 4 2011 Receipt No: 2 01 1(701 U� , SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEFT. APPLICANT: Stanley Kryla, 105 Skyline Drive, South Windsor, CT 06074 PROJECT NAME: N/A ADDRESS: N/A OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: N/A ADDRESS: N/A COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: N/A _ ASSESSOR'S MAP # N/A PARCEL# N/A ZONE N/A NAME, ADDRESS,TEL 8s FAX #OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie,Design Professionals Inc. 425 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 T: 860-291-8755 F: 860-291-8757 Estimated presentation time: 10 min. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision El Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certificate of Mailing) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development -State Hearing per Section 14-55 for ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing Required) © Regulation Amendment 0 Zoning ❑ Subdivision - Attach proposed amendment (Public He quired) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for(Public Hearing Required) ❑ In Law apartment/Accessory Apartment (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation for (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is requ4vd to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior being heard by the-Commission. Signature of Applc t Signature of Property Owner PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM DATE: 2/15/11 TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Rich Bond, Walter Summers, Jeff Doolittle Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mark Owens, Chris Dougan, Bob Deptula, Ron Asselin, John Caldwell, Dennis Sheridan FROM: Michele Lipe,AICP,Town Planner The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: Appl 11-06P, Kryla Zoning Amendment Location: ❑ Site Plan ❑ Subdivision No. Acres Zone Multi Family zones ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential No. Lots/Units Water: ❑ Public ❑ Private Well Sewerage: ❑ Public ❑ Septic System Project Description: Zoning amendment—included as PDF file Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area new open space/recreation area ❑ active []passive Planning Department notes: See attached proposal to modify the minimum frontage requirement for a multi-family complex. Please comment by 2/28/11 and return to the Planning Department. U - r —� Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Main Street hcog Hartford, Connecticut 06106-5310 Telephone: (860) 522-2217 • Fax: (860) 724-1274 www.crcog.org Melody A.Currey,Chairman Lyle A Wray,Executive Director ZONING REFERRAL FORM FOR: NOTIFICATION OF REFERRALS BY ZONING COMMISSIONS OF THE CAPITOL REGION FROM: ( )Zoning Commission - ( Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor ( )City or Town Council (Municipality) (acting as Zoning Commission) TO: Capitol Region Council of Governments Community Development Department February 15, 2011 241 Main Street (date) Hartford,CT 06106 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8-3(b)of the General Statutes of Connecticut,as amended,the following proposed zone change is referred to the Capitol Region Council of Governments for comment: NATURE OF PROPOSED CHANGE O Adoption of amendment of ZONING. ) Adoption or amendment of ZONING MAP for any area within 500 feet REGULATIONS applying to any zone. of another Capitol Region Municipality. within 500 feet of another Capitol Region Attach map showing proposed change. Municipality. Attach copy of proposed change in regulations. THE CHANGE WAS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED: O by municipal agency- (Specify) (,o) by petition PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID CHANGE IS SCHEDULED FOR: March2 2, 2011 MATERIAL SUBMITTED HEREWITH: O Public Notice ;) Regulation Changes O Other(Specify) O Map of Change O Supporting Statements HAS THIS REFERRAL BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY TO CRCOG? YES—_y NO IF YES,ON WHAT DATE? — (FOR USE BY CRCOG) Date Received (Authorized Signature) Title Town Planner Sent Certified? Address 5 4 0 Sullivan Ave File Number Z-2008- South Windsor CT .06074 BY LAW,THE ZONING COMMISSION SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ITS PROPOSAL TO SUCH REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY NOTLATER THAN THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING-TO BE HELD IN RELATION -- - THERETO.NOTICE SHALL BE MADE BY CERTIFIED MAIL,RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. CRCOG-1/08 A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region i ZONING AMENDMENT I PROJECT Kryla Zoning Amendment II APPL.#11-06P Modify Table 3.1.2.A to Add Footnote#9 to apply to the frontage requirement for the MF A/AA Zone d one-half feet 1.5' b requirement may be reduced b one 1 for eve one an ) y um frontage ( The minimum q y y ( ) every g which the development's front yard setback is increased;provided that the frontage is not reduced to less than 60 feet, subject to the following: a. The area where the frontage is parallel to the road,must be at least 200 feet in width and is subject to the 25 foot buffer requirement and an additional 50 foot front yard setback,i.e. 75 foot building setback(unless a greater setback is required by reduced frontage). b. The access area shall be excluded from 15 acre minimum requirement for establishing a MF zone and must be appropriately screened from adjacent properties. - mu(, .�_- � Appl 11-06P, Kryla Zoning Amendment II—Planning Report 3/22/11 L Applicant is requesting to modify the frontage requirement for a multi-family property which would allow a reduction in the required frontage based on setting the development back further off of the road. 2. Under the current regulations, an applicant is required to have 200 feet of road frontage and structures are required to be set back a minimum of 75 feet. There is no buffer required along the road frontage. 3. The Commission might want to consider requiring that the property have a minimum of 200 feet width parallel to the road before any structures. Also,this line is subject to a 25 foot buffer and we would recommend a minimum 50 foot front yard be added to ensure adequate distance from adjacent properties. 4. Staff concern is that there is adequate screening of properties that may be adjacent to this development and would recommend that the access way be appropriately screened from adjacent properties. To accomplish this, the Commission may want to consider requiring a minimum of 60 feet street frontage. 5. One advantage of this regulation is that it would allow the developer to propose a multi-family development without adding a short,town owned cul de sac street for the simple reason to get the appropriate frontage. 6. If this amendment is approved the planning department requests consideration of the following provisions: a. The area where the frontage is parallel to the road,must be at least 200 feet in width and is subject to the 25 foot buffer requirement and an additional 50 foot front yard setback, i.e. 75 foot building setback(unless a greater setback is required by reduced frontage). b. The access area shall be excluded from 15 acre minimum requirement for establishing a MF zone and must be appropriately screened from adjacent properties. c. The street frontage minimum width is 60 feet. Suggested wording if approved: Modify Table 3.1.2.A to Add Footnote#9 to apply to the frontage requirement for the MF A/AA Zone The minimum frontage requirement may be reduced by one (I)for every one and one-halffeet(L5) b which the develo ment's ront and setback is increased;provided that the onta a is not reduced Y 1� .f Y I� .�" g to less than 60 feet, subject to the following: a. The area where the frontage is parallel to the road, must beat least 200 feet in width and is subject to the 25 foot buffer requirement and an additional 50 foot front yard setback, i.e. 75 foot building setback(unless a greater setback is required by reduced frontage). b. The access area shall be excluded from 15 acre minimum requirement for establishing a MF zone and must be appropriately screened from adjacent properties �Q.N N S fq a 9 � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0001 4578 3726 March 9, 2011 Design Professionals Inc. 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Appl. # 11-06 Kryla Zoning Amendment II Please be advised that the Public Hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission in the above referenced matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 7:30 in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Someone must be present at the hearing to represent the application. Sincerely, Maria D. Acevedo Administrative Secretary `'4s "E6'°N• Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Main Street • Hartford • Connecticut • 06106 s DN 09 Telephone(860)522-2217 . Fax(860) 724-1274 ° www.ercog.org RNMEKt$• Mary Glassman, Chairman „ Lyle D. Wray,Executive Director RE ' ED s� MEMBERS March 18, 2011 R 21 N 1 l Andover Avon TO: TOWN OF SOUTH WI Old ONING COMMISSION Bloomfield Bolton REPORT ON ZONING REFERRAL Z-2011-07: Proposed amendment to zoning regulations regarding frontage requirements in the MF A/AA Zone(Table 3.1.2A). Canton East Granby COMMISSIONERS: Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mentioned referral. Notice of East Hartford this proposal was transmitted to the Planning Division of the Capitol Region Council of Governments under the provisions of Section 8-3b of the Connecticut General Statutes, as East Windsor amended. Ellington Enfield COMMENT: The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region Council of Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with Farmington regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. Glastonbury Granby Questions concerning this referral should be directed to Lynne Pike DiSanto. Hartford In accordance with our procedures this letter will constitute final CRCOG action on this Hebron referral. The public hearing date has been scheduled for 3/22/2011. Manchester Marlborough DISTRIBUTION: Planner: Hartford, Windsor, East Windsor, Ellington,Vernon, Manchester,East Hartford Newington Rocky Hill Simsbury Respectfully submitted, Sandra Bobowski,Chairman Somers Regional Planning Commission South Windsor Stafford Karl Robert Profe, Vice Chairman Suffield Regional Planning Commission Tolland Vernon West Hartford 6ynneike DiSanto,AICP Wethersfield Planner and Policy Analyst Windsor Windsor Locks A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate and implement regional programs of benefit to the towns and the region Page 1 of 1 Lipe, Michele From: Doolittle,Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:24 PM To: Lipe, Michele Cc: Gantick, Michael Subject: Kryla Zoning Amendment Michele, The South Windsor Engineering Division would not be in favor of a development that included a short cul-de-sac as a public street to access one rear property, when there were few or no other lots on the proposed public street. It that case the Town would have to assume the burden of maintaining, repairing and replacing a short public road including any storm drainage and sanitary sewers, that primarily serve one private property. It would be better for the Town to have a private driveway come all the way out to an existing public street that serves a much larger area. The Kryla Zoning Amendment II would allow for a private driveway to serve a large property with limited frontage from an existing public road. Thank You Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 860-644-2511 x 245 jeffrey.dooliftle@southwindsor.org 3/22/2011 Page 1 of 1 Acevedo, Maria From: Gantick, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:54 PM To: Acevedo, Maria; Bond, Richard; Caldwell, John; Deptula, Robert; Doolittle, Jeffrey; Dougan, Christopher; Favreau, Raymond; Galligan, Matthew; Lavigueur, Stephan; Owens, Mark; Reichle, Karl; Shaw, Fred; Summers,Walter Subject: RE: Re: 11-06P Kryla Zoning Amendment II I believe the proposed change is reasonable.The 50 foot ensures all necessary utilities could be installed. From: Acevedo, Maria Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:47 PM To: Bond, Richard; Caldwell,John; Deptula, Robert; Doolittle, Jeffrey; Dougan, Christopher; Favreau, Raymond; Galligan, Matthew; Gantick, Michael; Lavigueur, Stephan; Owens, Mark; Reichle, Karl; Shaw, Fred; Summers, Walter Subject: Re: 11-06P Kryla Zoning Amendment II Good Afternoon, Please see the attached application along with the PDF and forward any comments that we should add to the file. Thank you. Maria Acevedo Town of South Windsor Planning&Zoning Administrative Secretary 860-644-2511(Ext. 253) j 2/15/2011 Page 1 of 1 Acevedo, Maria From: Bond, Richard Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:11 PM To: Acevedo, Maria Subject: RE: Re: 11-06P Kryla Zoning Amendment II Seems like a reasonable compromise to me. Lt.Rich Bond Commander-Special Services Division South Windsor Police Services 151 Sand Hill Rd South Windsor CT 06074 860-648-6211 (office) 860-982-0351 (cell) richard.bond@southwindsor.org From: Acevedo, Maria Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:47 PM To: Bond, Richard; Caldwell,John; Deptula, Robert; Doolittle, Jeffrey; Dougan, Christopher; Favreau, Raymond; Galligan, Matthew; Gantick, Michael; Lavigueur, Stephan; Owens, Mark; Reichle, Karl; Shaw, Fred; Summers, Walter Subject: Re: 11-06P Kryla Zoning Amendment II Good Afternoon, Please see the attached application along with the PDF and forward any comments that we should add to the file. Thank you. Maria Acevedo Town of South Windsor Planning&Zoning Administrative Secretary 860-644-2511(Ext. 253) 2/15/2011 RECEIVED MAR 22 2Oil March 21, 2011 To the Planning and Zoning Commission, With regard to the proposed 11-06 P, Kryla Amendment II to the MF A/AA zoning, requesting a reduction in the minimum frontage requirement from 200 feet to 50 feet, it is the consensus of the Historic District Commission that this change should not be granted. It would set an irrevocable precedent in considering future MF applications. If approved, this amendment would reduce restraints on future projects that could impinge not only on residential neighborhoods,but historic structures as well. By its opposition, the Historic District Commission is not objecting to multi-family housing per se,but to the probability of significantly increased traffic in potentially inappropriate locations. Retaining the 200-foot frontage requirement gives the P &Z Commission more control over development in South Windsor. 06 t � �1�y 1(l '-t�����j 'I 1v1?i/il� _LL P.O.BOX 1167 I / 425 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 PHONE:860.291.8755 8757 f 'OMIS 2�A C /G�u, . ,,9Se YO" FAX:8onalsi ..coin Gibt� www.designprofessionalsinc.com- CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS I GIS ANALYSTS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connect/LOB Massachusetts, *Rhode Island • • • • • • Proposed Zoning Amendment L Revision.to.Table 3.1.2A Add footnote#9 to apply to the frontage requirement for the MF A/AA Zone "The minimum frontage requirement may be reduced by one foot(1')for every one and one-half feet I3')by wfiich e eve opment s front yar set ac is uicrease— d;provide�ic, n ever,tTiat�t ie frontage is not reduced to less than 50 feet." • • • • Documentl • From: kennedysinsw@aol.com{mailto:kennedysinsw@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:49 AM To: Acevedo, Maria Cc: Lipe, Michele Subject: Fwd: P&Z Meeting Maria, Please print this out and put it in the file to be read into the record at the continued public hearing on this application. Thanks, Pat -----Original Message----- From:Virginia Macro<hvmacro@hotmail.com> To: Gary Pitcock<gary06074@aol.com>; kennedysinsw<kennedysinsw@aol.com>; bpaceknois <bpaceknois@cox.net> Cc: tonygolfs<tonygolfs@att.net>; Nancy Mulroy<nmulroy74@gmail.com> Sent:Wed, Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm Subject: RE: P&Z Meeting Hello All, I feel that the confusion that transpired at last night's P&Z meeting regarding Gary's participation is largely my fault. I apparently forwarded the wrong letter to Donna Thompson in the Town Manager's office to print out and prepare for the meeting. I was in Philadelphia visiting my daughter on a quick visit. I knew that I had to get a letter opposing the proposed Amendment to the P&Z Commission before the meeting on Tuesday evening. Since I had not had a sufficient response from the Historic District Commission, I decided to send the letter on my own behalf. I deleted all references to the HDC and sent the letter to Donna, asking her to copy it to plain paper with no letterhead. Unfortunately, I must not have saved my corrections, or sent the original version to Donna to copy. I can only blame myself and the wonders of modern technology for the mistake. I deeply regret any difficulty that this error has caused. I hope you will accept my apologies. Sincerely, Virginia Macro J Page 1 of 1 Lipe, Michele From: Peter DeMallie[PDeMallie@designprofessionalsinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 12:29 PM To: Lipe, Michele Cc: 'Benjamin Wheeler, R.L.A. Subject: Kryla MF Frontage Amendment Michele-For the record, and on behalf of my client, Stanley Kryla, I am officially withdrawing the MF frontage zoning amendment application.Thank you. Peter R. DeMallie President&Principal Design Professionals, Inc. CIVIL&TRAFFIC ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS/GIS/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Serving Connecticut,Massachusetts,A Rhode Island P.O.Box 1167 860.291.8755 phone 425 Sullivan Avenue 860.291.8757 fax South Windsor,CT 06074 www.desionnprofessionalsinc.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure or distribution is prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 4/13/2011 i I I i i � ' I d C 7S F.Y. 1 I i �itti � tl i I - SO' F.Y. NNN vjl I 25'i_BUFFER SO' F.Y. Kau; -.Jnwm I l �I - PRIMARY ROAD PFJMARY -ROAD � Co t-f �1 EXIST ING REGU LATIONS S 2PROPOSED REGULATIONS Scale. II I I` -40 Scale:1"=40' . f I 1 �I I '' W j� lam. '�i ,• Y 7 U Pr. r �!�. . �� _ , .� ,� `•;;vim► h N 3S6>3 7y2 0 880 10 1p20 (o - 366 T ry VIP* N 39 102,Op Nti�• 132 6, 0 929•0 p 24; 6 �N p 0 co' 0 10 t"AS M .00 AN;, s2 78 20S(s) V � �04• 12 40. 00 - 0 - LLEy ^�D �• 109.3 Data provided by SBC under contract and is based on an autl�Wid�or . aerial flight performed in spring of 2005. This map is a Q TOWN LINE graphical representation of property information and is PARCELS subject to change. The Town of South Windsor,and SBC IS assume no legal responsibility for information depicted on Geographic Information System Inch — 60 feet this map and is to be used for planning purposes only.