Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-47P Ranco Collision Repair TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION o*x 8t APPLICATION FORM _ g Application No: Official Receipt Date: Receipt No: SLR�� ;�. APPLICANT: ()+�'�� �� � ��tj '��� PROJECT NAME: __ �G� �' , \��4; �} C?�.✓i ADDRESS: W� 94 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: ;T Ass i ez�i i_mac, M k;�.� ADDRESS: s C vv-, 3 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: . W ASSESSOR'S MAP #)=k PARCEL#9 ZONE NAME, ADDRESS, TEL& FAX# OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: v THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑ Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. r -1 *Siure&ofApplicant-- Signature of Pr erty Owner O!). oI 'oo PRI 14: 41 FA 86_242 (9587 I'I)S I:VG.& ('UNSI'IZ('(:'I'IUV j002 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS�,( APPLICANT / �� Q _ S fr14 d- // y t_ PROJECT NAME Q t/1GU CC) '7 z c© wl vj?Q-re-C � This checklist must be signed by plan preparer(P.E► �L.S.) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplied. 1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information: a. Nance, address and telephone of applicant. 'I/ b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. c. Name of Development. d. Date when drawings were made. 5 2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals either 100 feet or 200 feet. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet. a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Outline of buildings. c. Layout of streets. � D d. Surrounding property boundaries--within 500 feet. e. Names of abutting property owners. )W f. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. I <) d g. Driveway cuts on abutting properties and any properties across from proposed site. S qS � h. Distance to and name of nearest intersection street. 08. oI A)0 1-NI I4: 41 11AA 860 242 8587 ITS ENG.& CONSIRI'CTIUN i oo3 1 i �P5 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklist for Architecture and Design Review. 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: (1) 24" x 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. Zb. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking spaces. c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened). N9 e. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose. f. Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. The monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these CGS points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. Z" i. A-2 certification;OL.S. Seal. ✓ S. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: i/ a. All existing and proposed buildings. b. Curb Lines and pavement width, sidewalks. c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers. d. Existing and proposed water and-all existing utilities. V e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any trees to be saved should be shown. 09:0,Ij..00 FRI 14: 42 FAN 860 242 8587 ►DS EN(;.& CONSTRUCTION ljj004 ►/ f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one- foot intervals and spot elevations. 9 . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes and elevations of structures. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches, within Town ROW.) If plan/profile sheet is provided all of this does not need to be shown. Only to of frame elevations ns and inverts of open discharge pipe shall be p g p p shown on this plan. I. Connections of all springs into ,proposed storm drainage system as needed. j. Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 &T-2 Certificatio P.E L.S. Seals. 6. Landscaping plan: 7. Drainage calculations: - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines. 8. Traffic Report: 11 9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on // plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. A*- b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, sanitary sewer (including house sewer), foundation drains, lot lines, buildings including all utilities with elevations (top frame and inverts), size, type, length, slopes of pipes. . c. Sight line at driveway & street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations, sizes, lengths and slopes of pipes. Y , o!,). OI I10 PI21 14: .12 FAX 860 2-12 8587 ITS F..\G.& CONSI`Rt C'I'ION (hoos AA f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g. CGS datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls. The Town Engineer shall, 'based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, (inverts, top of frame) sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. 11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems. PLAN PREPARER ( .E./ ,) DATE June 23, 1998 Ranco Site Plan Planning Comments ♦ Key map must be submitted per the regulations ♦ Data Block- interior parking spaces do not count toward total spaces required ♦ Architecture and Design Review comments must be incorporated ♦ Handicap parking spaces must be designed to building code General Comments A-2 certification and P.E./L.S. seals and signatures are required A landscaping plan should be prepared separate from the plot/topo plan so that it is easier to understand. No planting are allowed in the site line area Water Pollution Control Authority WPCA approval is required. Are there any floor drains proposed? If so, a grease/oil separator will be required. RANCO SITE PLAN 1. Appbeatio for site plan-approval for awin� strial building,- ximately 5,100J� squ e fe80 �fice; 4,300 sf manufactring) fo:r pfoperty locatecJ on the sout e y side-of Commerce'W%y, I zone. 2. ',,6�o e ui g w' e s o aut6b�y'r�pairs. This use is being proposed under Section 6.1.2.7. This section relates to permitted uses in the industrial zone and states: any other industrial uses except those specifically regulated as Special Exception uses under section 6.1.3,when authorized by the Commission. In determining the appropriateness of the use,the Commission shall consider the criteria listed under section 6.1.3. Criteria include: ♦ The goals and objectives of the Plan of Development are met; ♦ Adverse traffic impacts are not created; . ♦ Negative impacts on property values are not created; ♦ The land is physically suited for its proposed use; ♦ Adverse environmental impacts are not created; ♦ There is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community need; ♦ Present and proposed utilities, streets, drainage system, and other improvements have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use ♦ Historic factors are adequately protected; and ♦ The overall physical appearance of the development is compatible with surrounding development and the Commission's goals for the neighborhood. 3. Site size is approximately 1 ac. Proposed building coverage 10.75%; 50% allowed. Proposed impervious coverage is 34.4%; 65% allowed. The required parking spaces based on the proposed 11; 11 spaces have been provided. There are additional 12 . spaces available inside the building. It appears that all other zoning requirements have been met. 4. The applicant is pending with the IWA/CC for conservation approval and will be heard on Nov. 1. AJO I 5. There is public water and public sewer available to the site. WPCA approval is required. Fred Shaw, Sup't of Pollution Control questioned if floor drains would be in the building. If there are, a grease/oil separator will be required. 6. The Architecture and Design Review Committee has reviewed the plans. They were very pleased with the proposed architecture of the building and the landscaping proposed. They had the following recomm ndation: topej- O(m eJc�d_urf Ie � �utiQ afe f d,JrJ�IP�i� • Clarify that the birch landscaping is a clump of birches • Overhead doors and trims to be of bronze color • Design the front of the building entirely with split block • Final color selections for the building are to be submitted to ADRC for review • Consider changing the ornamental tree to some sort of shade tree, i.e. bradford pear The applicant has addressed all of their recommendation on the revised plans submitted. 7. If this application is approved, the planning department requests the following modifications: • Key map should be simplified so that it is legible. Driveway cuts of surrounding properties should be shown. • Final color selections for the building and sign design are to be submitted to ADRC for review STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR RANCO COLLISION REPAIR COMMERCE WAY, SOUTH WINDSOR PREPARED BY.• BASCOMIMAGNOTTA, INC. SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 360 MAIN STREET DURHAM, CT 06422 SEPTEMBER, 2000 BA SCOM/MAGNOTTA,INC. 5 Project Narrative The project proposes to build a 5100 SF building on a 1 acre site with related parking and drainage. Design Criteria The design of the stormwater drainage system utilizes the rational method to determine the stormwater runoff rates. A 10-year rainfall rate for the New Haven area was used to design the drainage system. Runoff coefficient "C" and time of concentration "Tc" were determined using an overland flow nomograph and charts used by the Connecticut Department of Transportation in their drainage manual. The length of flow was determined from the hydraulically most distant point from the catch basin or structure. Both the hydraulic and inlet capacities were determined as part of this analysis. A gutter flow analysis using HEC-12 was performed on the two basins located in the entrance driveway. The analysis results are attached herewith. , BA SCOM/MAGNOTTA,INC. Hydraflow Storm Sewer Inventory Report Page 1 Line Alignment Flow Data Physical Data line ID No. Dnstr Line Defl Junc Known Dmg Runoff Inlet Invert Line Invert Line Line N J-loss Inlet( line length angle type 0 area coeff time El On slope El Up size type value coeff Rim Ei No. (ft) (deg) (cfs) (ac) (C) (min) (ft) M (ft) (in) (n) (K) (ft) 1 End 23.0 30.0 Comb 0.00 0.18 0.72 5.0 75.00 8.70 77.00 12 Cir 0.011 1.10 81.40 CB-2 TO CB-1 2 1 21.0 40.0 Comb 0.00 0.11 0.82 5.0 77.00 2.38 77.50 12 Cir 0.011 1.00 81.40 CB-3 TO CB-2 3 1 70.0 30.0 Hdwll 0.00 0.12 0.90 5.0 77.00 1.43 78.00 6 Cir 0,011 1.00 84,40 ROOFWATER DRAIN Project File: New.STM I-D-F File: SAMPLE.IDF Total number of Ines:3 Date: 09-15-2000 a Hydraflow inlet Report Page , Line Line ID A Inlet I C 0= 0 0 0 Junc Curb Inlet grate inlet (cutter Flow Byp No time CIA carry rapt byp type line Ht L area L W So W Sw Sx depth spread No (ac) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (in) (ft) (sgft) (ft) (ft) (ft/tt) (tt! tom) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 CB-2 TO CB-1 0.18 5.0 6.60 0.72 0.85 0.00 0.80 0.06 Comb 3.0 3.10 0.00 3.10 1.70 0.010 1.70 0.119 0.020 0.26 4.59 Offsfte 2 CB-3 TO CB-2 0.11 5.0 6.60 0.82 0.59 0.00 0.59 0.00 Comb 3.0 3.10 0.00 3.10 1.70 0.024 1.70 0.119 0.02w 0.20 1.68 1 i 3 ROOFWATER DR0.12 5.0 6.60 0.90 0.71 0.00 0.71 0.00 Hdwi 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 1 I i I III I I, Project File: New.STM TI-D-F File: SAMPLE.IDF Total number of lines:3 Run Date: 09-15-2000 NOTES: inlet N-Values= 0.015; Design depth for grate(s)= 0.3 (ft); Intensity=64.34!(Inlet time+10.70)^0.83; Return period= 10 Yrs.; 'Indicates Known 0 added ` I Hydraflow FL-DOT Report Page 1 Line To Type n- Len Drainage Area Time Time Inten Total Add Inlet Elev of Hf3L Rise HOL Actual Date: 09-15.2000 No Line of value of of CA Q elev, struc C1= 0.2 conc flow Elev of Crown Span Pipe Full Flow Frequency. 10 yrs C2= 0.35 in Total C3= 0.9 sect flow Elev of Invert Project: New.STM Incre- Sub- Sum Q Up Down Fall Size Slope Vei Cap ment total CA (ft) (ac) (ac) (min) (min) (inthr) (cfs) (ft) 00 M (ft) (in) (AJ4 (ftls) (cfs) Line description 3 1 Hdwtl 0.011 70.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.58 6.6 0.11 0.00 84.40 78.72 77.91 0.81 6 1.16 3.63 0.71 ROOFWATER DRAIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 78.50 77.50 6 1.43 4.03 0.79 0.12 0.12 0.11 78.00 77.00 1.00 Cir 2 1 Comb 0.011 21.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.17 6.6 0.09 0.00 81.40 77.87 77.91 -0.04 12 -0.21 1.53 0.59 CB-3 TO CB-2 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.59. 78.50 78.00 12 2.38 8.27 6.49 0.09 0.09 0.08 77.50 77.00 0.50 Cir 1 End Comb 0.011 23.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.58 0.19 6.4 0.33 0.00 81.40 77.62 76.50 1.12 12 4.85 3.42 2.11 CB-2 TO CB-1 0.06 0.08 0.03 2.11 78.00 76.00 12 8.70 15.80 12.41 0.12 0.33 0.29 77.00 75.00 2.00 Cir NOTES: Intensity=64.341(Tc+10.70)^0.83 (inlhr) Time of flow in section is based on a design velocity of 2.00(ftls); Initial taihvater elevation=76.50 (ft) ; Total flows limited to inlet captured flow d Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: New.�TNI Elev. (ft) 87.0 84.0 Line: 1 Line: 2 Size: 12(in) Size: 12(in) 81.0 78.0 75.0 72.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reach(ft) �L o r .e �09.- 01"'e)0 FRI 14: 41 FAX 860 242 8587 ITS I-N(:.& CONSIIN`CTION laoo2 y TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST p REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS APPLICANT A S t� C4'A PROJECT NAME RO 0� This checidist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E. L.S.) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplied. 1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information: !X a. Name, address and telephone of applicant. L' b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional / Engineer. c. Name of Development. d. Date when drawings were made. Ra i) 2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals either 100 feet or 200 feet. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet. a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Outline of buildings. ✓ c. Layout of streets. ' S d. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500 feet. ,ll ✓/ e. Names of abutting property owners. Alm-- f. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. ASS g. Driveway cuts on abutting properties and any properties across from proposed site. SA/N`P �S � h. Distance to and name of nearest intersection street. k 19: 011100 1-UI 14: 41 FAA 8 G 0 242 87)i8i ITS RVG.& CON51RUCION [aoo:A � . p 1 ' !ps 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklist for Architecture and Design v Review. 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: (1) 24" x 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking spaces. c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened). e. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose. +� f. Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. The monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these CGS points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. N°Ig h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. i. A-2 certification;OL.S. Seal. ✓ 5. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to / the requirements of the plot plans show the following: i/ a. All existing and proposed buildings. �V/ b. Curb Lines and pavement width, sidewalks. c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers. d. Existing and proposed water and-all existing utilities. e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any trees to be saved should be shown. 09i01'__h0 FRf 14: 42 FA 8ti0 242 8587 ITS RNGA CONST107CION M004 f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one- / foot intervals and spot elevations. t, g . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none_ are present. h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes and elevations of structures. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches, within Town ROW.) If plan/profile sheet is provided all of this does not need to be shown. Only top of frame elevations and inverts of open discharge pipe shall be shown on this plan. I. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as // needed. �l j. Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 &T-2 Certifcatio P.E L.S. Seals. 6. Landscaping plan: 7. Drainage calculations: - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines. 8. Traffic Report: 9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. --LA b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, sanitary sewer (including house sewer), foundation drains, lot lines, buildings including all utilities with elevations (top frame and inverts), size, type, length, slopes of pipes. c. Sight line at driveway & street Intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations, sizes, lengths and slopes of pipes. v a 09, 01 r'00 FRI 14:42 failN 860 2d2 8587 ITS ENG.& CONSTW C'I'ION (Moos f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g. CGS datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls. The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, (inverts, tap of frame) sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. 11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems. PLAN PREPARER ( .E./ ,) DATE June 23, 1998 MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Enginee Date: October 13, 2000 Re: RANCO SITE PLAN — 00-43P We have reviewed the plans dated 10-2-2000 and drainage calculations for the proposed Ranco Site Plan and have the following comments: Drainage Calculations 1. Drainage calculations and gutter flow analysis should use the town's standard forms as shown in the Public Improvement Specifications. Site Development Plan 1. A-2 and T 2 certification are required as well as the original seal and signature of a licensed land surveyor. 2. Sight line to the west is shown as "35 mph, 250' sight line". a. If 35 mph is the design speed, a minimum of 285 feet sight distance is required. b.- This is a minor collector road and as such our Public Improvement Specifications (pg I-8) indicate a design speed of 40 mph which would require a minimum sight distance of 365 feet. c. A sight line easement will be required from N/F JFI Associates to provide for the sight line indicated. 3. Sight line distance to the east is not indicated. 4. The proposed Flowering Pear tree seems to be in the way of sight line to the east. 5. The storm drainage should be designed to enter the catch basin in front of this lot, to minimize impacts on the existing road storm system. 6. Pipe sizes are to be a minimum of 15"diameter. 7. Drainage in front parking lot should be directed to catch basins not to the adjacent property. f t f Ranco Site Plan - 0043P Page 2. 8. An invert is required for sanitary lateral at connection to existing stub. 9. Grading on west side of building should follow the existing as close as possible and not cause adverse effect on N/F JFI Associates. 10.Grading in rear should be clearer—"grade to drain"doesn't appear to work with proposed contours. 11.Detail of catch basin is not the Town Standard (see Public Improvement Specs). 12.Details required for Storm and Sanitary pipe trenches, temporary pavement patching. 13.Any changes to the drawing must be made to the original, not the blue line copy submitted. JCl/jsv Y BASCOM 360 Main Street, Durham, Connecticut 06422 FMAGNOTTA, INC. Telephone: (860)349-1676 Durham (860)342-0786 Portland Fax: (860)349-8903 SURVEYING and ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Robert A. Bascom,L.S. Frank C.Magnotta,P.E. October 23, 2000 Mr. Jerry Iazzetta, P.E. Town Engineer South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Ranco Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Iazzetta: I am in receipt of your October 13 review memo for the referenced project and am submitting the following information and comments as described herein. Item: 1. A separate survey drawing will be submitted by the surveyor. 2. Although this road is classified as a minor collector, the road centerline was constructed with a radius adjacent to this lot of only 325 feet with a 90 degree of curvature. Based on AASHTO Geometric Design Guideline Standards Table III.8 (copy attached) the recommended design speed for this geometry is only 30 MPH. The DOT intersection criterion shows a 285-foot sight line at 35 MPH, which is appropriate for this particular location. 3. An easterly sight line distance will be shown on the plan. 4. The pear trees are no longer on the sight line with a change to 285 feet. 5. The storm layout has been revised accordingly. 6. Pipe sizes are shown to be 15 inches. 7. Proposed spot elevations and contour lines shown on the plan within the parking lot do direct water away from the adjacent lot and to the proposed catch basins. 8. The sanitary sewer as-built does not indicate the lateral stub invert. For lack of better information, it has been assumed to pitch at 2.0 percent. 9. The grading along the westerly property line is as close as practical to the building and presents no adverse effect on the adjacent property. 10.The grading along the rear of the building has been revised to more clearly show the desired effect. 11/12. Town standard details have been added to the plans. 13.The revised plans were intended as preliminary documents for review only. T Revised plans reflecting the above changes are attached herewith. Please contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely, Frank Magnotta, P. Bascom/Magnotta, Inc. BA SCOM/MAGNOTTA,INC. -zy- pa �► — LINE SEGMENT N KIN TIME TO INLET c,+ TIME IN PIPE n A I "l ACCUMULATED TIME © Al- ENTERING o tN CATCH easlN I _ SUM OF AC4 N IN SYSTEM N ti RAINFALL INTENSITY o a� a IN SYSTEM (h co PIPE SIZE WN o LENGTH OF PIPE SLOPE�, h N AVERAGE VELOCITY Q w FULL CAPACITY p � � o HEADWATER a n Qp ��� �Gi� ►�Sp�1 �Ja+M w�O� 3 � T oN 133HS AS a3>133HO wain 13a1S 00 VOL)-si-p/ �•�. � 31V0 As 03Noim 1�3POad Z'Z WaO� N9I630 W31S1S a3AUS NUO1S UOSaNIM H1f10S J0 NMOl N31ine iv k:> • • • • ■■■■■III■■III■■■■■III■■III—%/i■III■■■11►//.%/.///.II% ■■■■■III■■III■■■■■Il��/�ir1�!� �i %■%11■% �1%//.'////%■%11 �■■■111111111�■ I �/ I.�////%�IIII • ■■■■■III■■III ad//%q%/_i%��7i �■■■■/%■�%%���//■■■■11 ����■■■■ ■■■/�II'lI�PmpAsi%r"%ii%���■/%II/%I�iL�/II��■■■■■ ■■■■■III■/i�1///�/%�:i�% :ii�■■■■%%fir/%►//i// ■■■■11 lose �■■■Ili®�/r�:%/_�•si./�1111■■■/�1��/.�/��/ ■■1111 • �■�����■■.��■�.�.i'�,cis■■■�.■■■■�■���i�.r�►.■►�►�i.■� �■��.■■■ ��/%�i/;%/ � �%■■■III■■III��%/%%/%1`ir%/' t■■■■■III • . �//�,:;i�'d1■■■■■III■■III //////►%// IFS■■■■II - • •': !�% i�llll■■■�IIIIIIIII/�%%'/.//I�% IitE ■■■■■III■■III■■■■■III •• ■III■■■1(■�i�%.�i • • .• 1■■III■�■�%i:%�%�%/����■III !!Illl� O /�oilk%■11111 . . . :. . . . - , rs�..��_/■■111111111�■■11111 . .• . •�. • : •• i%■III■�■■■■II■■■11�■■■■■11 • ' � 1■■���■■■■�■�111111���11111 111111■■■■111 Circular Channel analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Work:sheet Name! Comment: RANCO COLLISION REPAIR Solve For Full Flow Capacity Given input Data: Diameter.......... 1.25 it Slope............. 0.0152 ftift Manning's, n....... 0.01+1 Discharge......... 10.35 cis Computed Results: Full Flow Capacity..... Iu.35 cis Full Flow Depth........ 1.25 it Velocity.......... 8.44 fps Flow Area......... 1.23 sf Critical Depth.... 1.11� it Critical Slope.... 0.0132 ftift Percent Full...... 100,00 % Full Capacity..... 10. 5 cis QMAk @.94D........ 11.14 cfs . Froude Number..... FULL :Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 19901 Haestad Methods, Inc. x 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 067108 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet .dames Comment: RANCO COLLISION REPAIR Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data: Diameter.......... I.cS ft Slope............. E .C4iSc ft/ft Manning's n....... 0.010 Discharge......... 0.81 c4E Computed Results. Depth............. 0.24 ft Velocity.......... 5.02 fps Flow Area......... OiIE, s - _ Critical Depth.... 0.35 ft Critical Slope.... 0.0031 ftift Percent Fell...... 18.92 % Full Capacity..... 10.35 cfs OMAX D.94D........ 11.14 cfs Froude Number..... 5.18 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd Y Waterbury, Ct 06708 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment: RANCO COLLISION REPAIR. Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data- Diameter.......... 1.25 it Slope............. 0.0152 ftrft Manning's n....... Discharge......... 1.36 cis Computed Results: Depth............. 0.31 ft Velocity.......... 5.84 fps Flow Area......... 0.23 sf Critical Depth.... 0.46 it Critical Slope.... 0.001 ftfft Percent Full...... 24.43 '% Full Capacity..... 10.35 cis OMAY @.94D........ 11.14 cis Froude Number..... 2.21 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct OE-708 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: 6 7-t,� ,- SEC 2000 (QA A sOp1HWiNDSO I` 1 j FNG.O B / WE ARE SENDING YOU: O PZC initial plans O Drainage computations O PZC revised plans O Bond estimate request O PZC Final plans for review O Bond reduction request f O PZC Final plans for filing O Correspondence O IWA/CC plans O Other NO. OF COPIES APPLICATION NUMBER PROJECT/APPLI b _ `� THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: �Y For review and comment , For your files O For your use O As requested O Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: CO S: 600, !L Copy to: From: Planning Department- 10/98 T Town 0_�g SOU44, wz� s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•co`'e'w AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 4, 2001 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Jonathan Festa 107 Old Windsor Road Bloomfield, CT 06002 Dear Mr. Festa: Re: - Revised Approval Letter, Appl#00-47P, Ranco Site Plan. We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on 10/31/00 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Site Plan of Development. This approval is for the construction of a 5,100 sq. ft. auto body repair facility on property located at 72 Commerce Way,I zone as shown on plans prepared by PDS Engineering and Construction,Job No. 89821-01, dated September 2000, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission,including a bond in the amount of$1,000. 4. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. Footing drains are required if the building has a basement. 6. A landscape bond in the amount of$1,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. WPCA approval is required. 9. Engineering comments of 10/31/00 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 10. Key map must be made legible, including driveway cuts on the surrounding properties. 11. Final color selections for the building and sign design are to be submitted to ADRC for review. 12. Sight line easement required from N/F JFI Associates to ensure sight line to the west. 13. No outdoor storage of damaged vehicles. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet#1 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The,letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commissionr must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf Enclosures cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal low" sE� t� G_psa� GJZ)• 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 oR•C� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 January 10,2001 Mr.Jonathan Festa PDS Engineering&Construction 107 Old Windsor Road Bloomfield,CT 06002 RE: Approval to Connect—Ranco Collision Repair 72 Commerce Way South Windsor,CT Dear Mr.Festa: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its regular meeting of January 2,2001,gave approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a commercial building at 72 Commerce Way as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Site Development Plan",prepared by Bascom&Magnotta, Inc.,Project No.89821-01,Drawing No(s).1 dated 9-2000,revised 10-16-00 and Drawing No.2 dated 10- 2000,with no revisions,and subject to the following conditions: 1. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. 2. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority,and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. 3. A connection charge of$2,722.50 based on 1.089 acres be paid at the time the permit is issued. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, Thomas in on,Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority TH:dd CC:Matthew Galligan,Town Manager Michael J.Gantick,Director of Public Works Jerry Iazzetta;Town Engineer Marcia Banach,Director of Planning John Collins,Chief Building Inspector J.F.I.Associates,Inc. MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: March 7, 2001 Re: RANCO SITE PLAN — 00-47P We have reviewed the final plans dated 2-1-2001, revised 3/1/2001 for the proposed Ranco Site Plan and have the following comments: Site Development Plan 1. A-2 and T-2 certification are required as well as the original seal and signature of a licensed land surveyor. Map Showing Land to be Conveyed to Ranco Collision Repair 1. Coordinates of one monument are missing and should be shown. 2. Datum used should be identified on drawing. JCl/awp S:ENGINEER\Proj-P&Z and Wetland Apps\Ranco\March32001comments MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Enginee Date: October 13, 2000 Re: RANCO SITE PLAN — 00-43P We have reviewed the plans dated 10-2-2000 and drainage calculations for the proposed Ranco Site Plan and have the following comments: Drainage Calculations 1. Drainage calculations and gutter flow analysis should use the town's standard forms as shown in the Public Improvement Specifications. Site Development Plan 1. A-2 and T-2 certification are required as well as the original seal and signature of a licensed land surveyor. 2. Sight line to the west is shown as "35 mph, 250' sight line". a. If 35 mph is the design speed, a minimum of 285 feet sight distance is required. b. This is a minor collector road and as such our Public Improvement Specifications (pg I-8) indicate a design speed of 40 mph which would require a minimum sight distance of 365 feet. c. A sight line easement will be required from N/F JFI Associates to provide for the sight line indicated. 3. Sight line distance to the east is not indicated. 4. The proposed Flowering Pear tree seems to be in the way of sight line to the east. 5. The storm drainage should be designed to enter the catch basin in front of this lot, to minimize impacts on the existing road storm system. 6. Pipe sizes are to be a minimum of 15"diameter. 7. Drainage in front parking lot should be directed to catch basins not to the adjacent property. OwN 8F*4 � C07 u 6 1540 SULLIVAN AVE UE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 S R•c0 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 14, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Jonathan Festa 107 Old Windsor Road Bloomfield, CT 06002 Dear Mr. Festa: j Re: Appl #00-47P, Ranco Site Plan We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on 10/31/00 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Site Plan of Development. This approval is for the construction of a 5,100 sq. f1. auto body repair facility on property located?4 Commerce Way, I zone as shown on plans prepared by PDS Engineering and Construction, Job No. 89821-01kc-1 ated September 2000, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: I 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$1,000. 4. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. Footing drains are required if the building has a basement. 6. A landscape bond in the amount of$1,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. WPCA approval is required. 9. Engineering comments of 10/31/00 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 10. Key map must be made legible, including driveway cuts on the surrounding properties. 11. Final color selections for the building and sign design are to be submitted to ADRC for review. 12. Sight line easement required from N/F JFI Associates to ensure sight line to the west. 13. No outdoor storage of damaged vehicles. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet #1 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: October 31, 2000 t2� Re: IRANCO SITE PLAN — 00-43P We have reviewed the revised plans dated 10-16-2000 for the proposed Ranco Site Plan and have the following comments: Site Development Plan 1. A-2 and T-2 certification are required as well as the original seal and signature of a licensed land surveyor. 2. Sight line to the west is shown as 285 feet. a. A sight line easement will be required from N/F JFI Associates to provide for the sight line indicated. 3. Grading in rear should not be drained onto N/F JFI Associates. Map Showing Land to be Conveyed to Ranco Collision Repair 1. Coordinates of monuments should be shown. 2. This map should be included as part of the application and labeled as such. 3. The westerly corner shows a piece of this parcel as""N/F Town of So. Windsor" Has this land been conveyed or is it still owned by the Town? The Site Development Plan does not show this parcel as N/F Town of So. Windsor. jCl/jsv PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, ARM. lichael Gantick, Thomas Field, Bill Lanning, John Bond, Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Niel Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula, Jerry Iazzetta FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: Location: tAj `Site Plan O Subdivision No. Acres Zone T �7 Industrial O Commercial Cl Residential No. Lots/Units Water: 7 Public Cl Private Well Sewerage: C�Public Cl Septic system(s) Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved?U Cl Yes No P O new street(s) O new detention area O new open space/recreation area Cl active Cl passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by / i 71 v and return to the Planning Department. r BASCOM 360 Main Street, Durham, Connecticut 06422 MAGNOTTA, INC. Telephone: (860)349-1676 Durham (860)342-0786 Portland Fax: (860)349-8903 SURVEYING and ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Robert A. Bascom,L.S. Frank C.Magnotta, P.E. October 23, 2000 Mr. Jerry Iazzetta, P.E. Town Engineer South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue I South Windsor, CT 06074 REC y Re: Ranco Site Plan Review 001 ?tl>10 Dear Mr. Iazzetta: SOUTH WINDSOR PLAN06 D€PTw I am in receipt of your October 13 review memo for the referenced project and am submitting the following information and comments as described herein. Item: 1. A separate survey drawing will be submitted by the surveyor. 2. Although this road is classified as a minor collector, the road centerline was constructed with a radius adjacent to this lot of only 325 feet with a 90 degree of curvature. Based on AASHTO Geometric Design Guideline Standards Table 1II.8 (copy attached) the recommended design speed for this geometry is only 30 MPH. The DOT intersection criterion shows a 285-foot sight line at 35 MPH, which is appropriate for this particular location. 3. An easterly sight line distance will be shown on the plan. 4. The pear trees are no longer on the sight line with a change to 285 feet. 5. The storm layout has been revised accordingly. 6. Pipe sizes are shown to be 15 inches. 7. Proposed spot elevations and contour lines shown on the plan within the parking lot do direct water away from the adjacent lot and to the proposed catch basins. 8. The sanitary sewer as-built does not indicate the lateral stub invert. For lack of better information, it has been assumed to pitch at 2.0 percent. 9. The grading along the westerly property line is as close as practical to the building and presents no adverse effect on the adjacent property. 10. The grading along the rear of the building has been revised to more clearly show the desired effect. 11/12. Town standard details have been added to the plans. 13.The revised plans were intended as preliminary documents for review only. Revised plans reflecting the above changes are attached herewith. Please contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely, Frank Magnotta, P. Bascom/Magnotta, Inc. BA SCOM/MAGNOTTA,iNc. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN FORM 2.2 PROJECT DESIGNED BY DATE �q on /(' �1 STREET FIRM CHECKED BY SHEET No 1 72 Caw, wn erg a � N31VMOV3H a o � Q AlIDVdVO 'linxi A1130-13A 39Va3AV N a 3d0-lS - `^ 3did d0 H1JN3-1 M - N � 3ZIS 3did N31SAS NI 0 OD I�J) cn cr � 1 A11SN31N1 -I-lV3NIVN ►� N I V431SAS NI N V� d0. NIns NISV8 HD1VO SNIN31N3 lW 10 3N11 a31V-lnrmoov �r I � v 3dld NI 3N11 M 131N1 01 3N11 cv v� Val 1N3N93S 3N1-1 — - -r�- TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS FORM 2.1 PROJECT, /� DESI N �Y DATE PROJECT � ( .�//S�GY1l/' STREET FIRM CHECKED BY SHEET No NISVS H31VO w ONIa31N3IV 13-IN1 9NISSVdA8IV !2 p 131N1 ONISSVdAB 0 r,) Q MO'ld d0 1-11GIM M — a311no iv a MOId d0 Hld3G — o Q a3a-lnOHS d0 _ �1 0 3dOlS SSONO — o 0 0 U311no d0 30VaJ 131N1 01 0 ao O '0 kIISN31NI "11VdNIVa m ^� IV 1V101 ►� K1 �? 0 J-$M d0 Wf1S M IN31DIdd300 ddONna a S3aOV NI V.38V M o O 13-lN1 01 3W11 a vk v 13Sdd0 GNV _ NOIlV1S 131NI Pp 0 Ujjtj • • ����■��1 ■��l�O��■�l1■���1P21/aN■IINsoII//.%/.//././/% ����II1111111�� 11:�1���: ppp //_y11111/,/'A'I/%►1111 �����■■■�..■■� ��■...��- .�i��.ii•r��■■■+�ram■/�I/�i�.■■■ rn Pio �����.■����■�'�i���.cis■.■�.■■■����ii�.r�r.■►�r��.■� IMMINESS.■■PPI MEN • I'%PEP ilW,"&Y;*:G%!mm OEM MEN■■■�I/.//%/AEU IT/' t����■■■■ �� : 11/VIJ All'All IRENEEll , 1 W . 1111111111/A� 118 111OR%� /�11111 I be a • _ . :. • . .' MESIMEMS MEN i%%�1111111111���11111 Circular Channel Analysis & [lesion Solved with trianning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment: RANCO COLLISION REPAIR Solve For Full Flow Capacity Given Input hata: Diameter.......... 1.25 it Slope............. 0.0152 ftift Manninq`s n....... (1.010 Discharge......... 10.15 cf_ Computed Results: Full Flow Capacity..,.. 1Q.35 cis Full Flow Depth........ 1.25 it Velocity 8.44 fps Flow Area......... 1.23 sf Critical Depth.... I.i9 it Critical Slope,,,, 0.01:32 ftift Percent Full...... Full Capacity'..... 10.35 cis OMAI @.94D........ 11.14 cfs Froude Number..... FULL Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Method=, Inc. x 37 Brookside Rd 4 Waterbury, Ct 067uS Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with planning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet .fame: Comment: RAI4CO COLLISION REPAIR Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data: Diameter.......... 1.25 ft Slope............. {?.oi5 ft/ft Manning's n....... 0.01i, Discharge......... O.e1 cf= Computed Results: Depth............. 0.24 ft Velocity.......... `X2 fps Flow Area......... 0.16 sf Critical Depth.... !Q-, ft Critical Slope.... O.Oo31 ftift Percent Full...... 18.92 Full Capacity..... 10.35 cfs Gp1AR @.94D........ 11.14 cfs Froude plumber..... 2.13 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. + 37 Brookside Rd 4 Waterbury, Ct 067o8 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment: RANCO COLLISION REPAIR. Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data: Diameter.......... 1.25 ft Slope............. 0.0152 ft/ft Manning`s n....... !i,iili; Discharge......... 1.3r cfs Computed Results: Depth............. 0.31 ft Velocity.......... 5.84 fps Flow Area......... 0.23 sf Critical Depth.... 0.46, ft Critical Slope.... 0.0031 ft/ft Percent Full...... 24.43 '% Full Capacity..... 10.35 cfs OMAX R.94D........ 11.14 cfs Froude Number..... 2.21 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Nodule, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. 4 07 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: �Z DEC ' 1'3 2000 INDSOR WE ARE SENDING YOU: e 8 4 O PZC initial plans 0 Drainage computations 0 PZC revised plans 0 Bond estimate request O PZC Final plans for review 0 Bond reduction request O PZC Final plans for filing 0 Correspondence 0 IWA/CC plans 0 Other NO. OF COPIES APPLICATION NUMBER PROJECDAPPLICANT dS THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: N' For review and comment , For your files 0 For your use 0 As requested O Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: CO S: /L i� Copy to: From: Planning Department - 10/98 tOw" 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 OR'c°� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 May 10, 2001 Mr. Jonathan Festa PDS Engineering& Construction 107 Old Windsor Road Bloomfield, CT 06002 Dear Mr. Festa: Re:Preconstruction Meeting—App100-47P,Ranco IN ATTENDANCE See attached The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Commerce Way. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist requested for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist — d. Preparation of subbase, six(6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete,two(2) inch layers maximum 2. $1,000 erosion and sedimentation bond and $1,000 landscape bond to be posted prior to filing of mylars. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting (if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Sgt. Tom Fields at Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building_Denartment 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, 127 I ;LL' J X. 07 Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Karl Reichle, Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control — CL&P BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: I a 1 CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER NAME & ADDRESS -An iv -,j 13a, l�ez pw� i nv , C7 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS Czw,\nnli, k LOT sumadmtroWN F\0V\C.o C-0 P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER 49 t AMOUNT OF BOND (�0 CHECK NUMBER I 3 9 y �$ DEPARTMENT r l a n n i o< SUBMITTED BY (,� `-'l � r�s� Olr DATE NAM E� Ito( RECEIVED BY FINANCE DATE NAME SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER I e n o y'7 S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc Phone (860)677-7732 Fax (860)677-8068 Neriani Surveying P.O.-Box 1203 35 Old Farms Road Avon,Connecticut 06001 July 6, 2004 Mr. Andrew Hewitt Ranco Collision 72 Commerce Way South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Andrew, This note is to confirm that we have completed setting the iron pins as shown on the enclosed map dated to a revised date of July 2, 2004. All monuments and pins are in place as shown. Thank you, Arthur M. Neriani CT LS # 10250 10%gN S£4 To� 07-4 ?d&U&01t c 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�OsoR'co�' TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 September 14, 2010 Andrew Hewitt 132 Deepwood Drive Manchester CT 06040 Dear Mr. Hewitt: Re: App1.00-47P, Ranco Automotive Landscaping Bond Release Appl.00-16P, Ranco Automotive IWA/CC Bond Release This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on September 14, 2010 to release the above mentioned bonds in the total amount of$2,000. A check will be mailed to you from the Town of South Windsor. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Very truly ours, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION PK/ma cc: Town Engineer