Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCrossroads at Buckland Hills 1 ' REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN THE CROSSROADS AT BUCKLAND HILLS ' LAND USE AREA MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT FOR ' MANCHESTER I-84 ASSOCIATES AND JOHN FINGUERRA ' AUGUST 3, 1990 .DECEIVED ' 1_ANi`.ING DEPARTMENT AUG 6 1990 ' F -CHESTER, Cl 86-481 FUSS & O'NEILL, INC. ' 146 HARTFORD ROAD MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 06040 O FUSS&aNEILL ' consulting engineers ' August 3, 1990 Mr. Mark Pellegrini ' Director of Planning Town of Manchester 41 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040 ' RE: Revised Final Development Plan The Crossroads at Buckland Hills Land Use Area A Dear Mr. Pellegrini: ' On behalf of Manchester I-84 Associates and John Finguerra, we are transmitting herewith eight (8) copies of a revised Final Development Plan for a portion of the project known as The ' Crossroads at Buckland Hills. This project is proposed to be constructed on a portion of one of the land use areas shown ( "A" ) on the Land Use Plan of the Preliminary Development Plan, C.U.D. Zone, Buckland Hills submitted by Manchester I-84 Associates and ' John Finguerra in March of 1988 and approved by the Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission on June 20, 1988. This portion of Land Use Area "A" was formerly known as Phase I and received Final ' Development Plan approval on June 18, 1989. The intent of this submission is to provide sufficient detail to ' evaluate the proposed revised development as well as to respond to comments, questions and/or changed conditions which have arisen since approval of the Final Development Plan. ' If you should have any questions regarding the attached material, please contact us at your earliest convenience. ' ery truly o rs, Ja J. le P.E. ' Vice dent /bmw Enclosure cc: John Finguerra ' Richard Ripps Corres. File 86-481 ' 0731B90JG 146 HARTFORD RD. / MANCHESTER, CT 06040/TEL: (203) 646-2469, FAX: (203) 643-6313 ' SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES• SURVEYING 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC• PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT 9 HYDROGEOLOGY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ' I INTRODUCTION 1 II PROPOSED REVISION 1 ' III WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SEWERS 2 ' IV STORM DRAINAGE 2 V TRAFFIC 3 APPENDICES. ' APPENDIX A COMPUTATIONS FOR ON-SITEDRAINAGE SYSTEMS APPENDIX B DETENTION BASIN COMPUTATIONS ' APPENDIX C D.E.P. LETTER ON STORMWATER RUNOFF ' APPENDIX D TRAFFIC REPORT APPENDIX E SANITARY SEWER INVERT INFORMATION ' APPENDIX F STORM DRAINAGE INVERT INFORMATION Correa. File 86-481 0731B903G I INTRODUCTION In accordance with Section 8.11 of Article II of the Zoning ' Regulations of the Town of Manchester, a revised Final Development Plan has been prepared for a portion of a land ' use area which is part of a Preliminary Development Plan previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. ' The previously approved plan was entitled "CUD Zone Preliminary Development Plan, Buckland Hills, Town of Manchester, Connecticut" and was submitted by Manchester I-84 ' Associates and John Finguerra. That plan was originally approved on June 20, 1988 and most recently approved as revised on December 4, 1989. The original FinaliDevelopment Plan for this land use area, entitled "Final Development Plan. ' - Phase I, The Crossroads at Buckland Hills, A Portion of Land Use Area "A", Manchester, Connecticut for Manchester ' I-84 Associates and John Finguerra" was approved on September 6, 1989. The approved Preliminary Plan encompassed a parcel of land approximately one hundred fifty (150) acres in size generally ' bounded by Buckland and Slater Streets on the west and east respectively, on the south by Interstate Route 84 and on the north by the Manchester-South Windsor Town line. The land under consideration in this report is approximately twenty-five (25) acres in size and is a portion of the area designated as land use area "A" in the Preliminary Plan. ' II PROPOSED REVISION ' The applicant proposes to develop one large retail facility on each of Phases IA and IB with floor areas of 104, 500_ ' square feet and 110,000 square feet respectively, and a small Corres. File 86-481 ' 0731B90JG L ' retail facility on Phase IC with a floor area of 6,000 square ' feet. This same general area is currently approved for 239,000 square feet of retail and 14,425 square feet of ' office. Since the proposed revision contains 18,500 square feet less retail and 14,425 square feet less office than the ' epproved plan, the applicant will reserve the difference for future development on Phase II. Therefore, the area coverage ' and floor area ratios remain unchanged for Land Use Area "A" . The purpose of this submission is to provide detail in ' accordance with the Zoning Regulations sufficient to evaluate the proposed revised site development. II WATER SUPPLY & SANITARY SEWERS ' There have been no changes in the density of proposed 9 Y ' development from the approved Preliminary- Development Plan and, therefore, the existing and/or proposed water and sanitary sewer facilities will be sufficient to support the ' development herein proposed and no adverse impacts are anticipated. III STORM DRAINAGE ' To satisfy storm drainage requirements for this revised Final ' Plan submission, two (2) aspects of storm drainage were examined in detail. These were on-site collection systems and the Buggie Stowe Pond detention basin to which they ' discharge. Drainage computations in support of the on-site collection systems and the Buggie Stowe Pond detention ' Corres. File 86-481 0731890JG facility are presented in Appendices A & B respectively. As stated in the Preliminary Development Plan report as revised May 6, 1988, Buggie Stowe Pond has sufficient capacity to serve Land Use Parcel A and, therefore, no t on-site detention is required. The State Department of Environmental Protection reviewed the storm drainage system ' as proposed in 1989 and has determined that "this discharge of storm water runoff cannot reasonably be expected to cause pollution. " (Appendix C) IV TRAFFIC t The attached memorandum (Appendix D) addresses the issue of the traffic with respect to any changes which may have occurred between submission of the previously approved Final Development Plan and this Final Plan. . As can be seen by review of Appendix D, since there have been no changes in the density of proposed development from the approved Preliminary ' Development Plan, there are no changes in the anticipated generation rates. Therefore, the construction proposed as ' part of this Final Development Plan and as part of the Town's agreement with the Mall at Buckland Hills Partnership provide ' for save and efficient travel with acceptable levels of service. I Corres. File 86-481 ' 0731B90JG <C x 0 Z W a a a FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY A4FD a-Z-90 90-Z51 rt0(YlE DFPoT STop(1j l�2q►�AGE CAt_CuuATi(30S SHEET NO. Z5 YFAQ DQAiNAGr AmA 0.16 Acp-Fs I Ail PAd F-MFpaT 9 x 7 I z 0.16 1.0 cF5 C� 2 loft �R6ENAC,F 4A = 0.10 AcPFS ' ALL PA\irVAF+j-r 7,1 x 0.10 0.6 cFS t c3 3 a � t�1? ,► �cc Ap-,-,A - o.09 AcfzeS Ate. PAvFnnr.,,j-r C3 -rOTAt 10i p NAC C A Pf-A 0.17 Ac.RE S AV, Pr%Y F;Vv r4-LT x '7,i z o, 7 , } CFS Cg*�5 T k- DP-DP AeF►q = 0.16 Acvf-s 9 x `7,1 X o.16 - I,O cFS CB 46 To-r ►���,�ac. Avff a - o,ZI Acmes ' A t PA V F-vvi 5 - 9 x IM k p .Z I = .3 cF S FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY MFD 8-2.90 90 -ZS I SHEET NO of 1 e Au PA-a�-wtF;NT T I k o.08 = 0.7 o-rs C3 8 r o-mk RA,"tom Ae r-A = o A Ac.P r-s Qzy 9 x 7,1 x 0.1A - 0,9 eFS CB 9 ©,K Acvf" rwt F Au.. P�,v ►.-n Q2� ,q x ?� 1 V O,tE) " 5. 7-CFS C3 IO TiAt 1�i7���r�A<:r QefA = 0,37 AcpFS I Au Q715 , �3 x 7, 1 x o.37 - 2 A CFs Cl3 ! I )o—rA" T APFA = 036 Ac(r--L Ai-L PAVF-mF,"T Qz5 - 9 x 7. 1 x 0,36 - 2.3CF5 Cy {Z T-rAt L Airs AtL PI)WNV t N\i-i Q2- ,9 x 7, 1 r 0.4� - 3, 1 CFS y -� FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY NIFD d-2-90 90 - Z51 ISHEET NO. -T 3 of -A ToTt ^lrNAc:c Aar-fl = 0.04 /et�FS Av- Ptl vrwrt-j a- QZ� - ,9 x 7, I x o,o4 Ca ) -1 D AC Af -,A = 0,16 Acj,f 1 PAv- PAIIGY'�ar,•JT _ Q25 ,9 cF S Ca IS R-AiMA6f-- A?,rF1 0,73 A�2R-5 A At. PAVfWXNT C ,9 x 7,1 x Q.73 = 4,7 cFs 16 1OrA� - IOPAiNA(,F AVFA -- Q,1`7 AcrS S Pit'l F:V1n F.►-,t r = 0, 10 A C C- •gG GOIASS � C.n`7 AC C7,25 17 63 x 7.1 x 1 '7 0,8 cFs SAME AS CB4 1p� 18 I oft � A try AEf A v F-A = O.4-6 ACRES 71 eFs 1 -� FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY 90- Z51 SHEET NO. L� of _G3 19 ra-TAt- DeAtoAc.r ARfA azb Qa5 ,9 x `1. I x .36 2.3 CF5 ALL P)�VF.-W --NT QZy .9 K 7cI 1-3.IC-) I,Z CFS .9,7,1 x 0,77 = 1,7 c-FS C8 ZZ -7 0 P6 )PPIINAC-f. A(?f•!l = C),VA A QF }SC-L V,? cJ FvLt f—r-41 Z ,9 x 7, I x o,0 ) - ©.6 C-FS Q � C.13 23 2 icy-rqt �L ,Hac. A?-rA = ©.00R Aars qLL p��F,wt F�r.t 1 4�5- - ,9 x `7. 1 Y. 0 S C3 z 1 0TXh. -NDVA,HAC-F Avr,4 = 0.06 R2,CX,s � A5 Z3�.Z s 4 �r r� +�■� r r r rr r� rs ri sr �I rr rr 1� r � r r --� a M a cn 0 0 0 O 3 C++ ?� G m 0 C+ m o C+ la a. m ��ici -v �' 'b 'Off m - A T N S T '� 't 7 C p R} m O a p 7a Y O C In (+ O O N m v 0 A 17 O 1" :3 � 7 '�1 '�1 2� N� N• '• ( 7 to - eh (AQ ? 'X X co ' n O 13 of . 7 C+ C* t 0 g g 1 5.0 o.,6 9 o.i4 2.14 �.) LO O.033 o•Oz5 0. 2 4.9 0.36 0.05 0.09 g 00 . � N 2 5.01 9 o.Qj) 0.09 7•1 0.6 U.O33 0•02.5 0.10 .4.1 0.17 0.02 0.07 N O 3 5.0 0.09 .9 o.op o,13 71 0.9 LOW POINT o,13 us (J 4 S.O 0.17 .9 0.15 ?•I I•Z LOW POo4T 0.11 - s z 5 5.0 o.i E, 9 0.14 0.1 7.1 I.O Low Pow r A 0.14 r A x , 6 S.O o•21 9 a.�9 0.19 7.1 1 1.3 LOW PolmT 0+19 Ill . z _0 7 5.O 0 a8 .3 0.017 0.0'1 7.1 r o•ti o.a33 co.oz5� 0.10 3.8 0.12 0•oz o•os � A 8 5.0 0.4 0.13 7.1 0.9 0.033 0.025 Q.%Z 4.7 0.7,9 o•oy o.09 o � 9 5.0 0.86 9 0.11`1 LOW FOiNT 0.83 i � o /0 5.0 (3.37 9 0.33 o.33 7•1 2.3 0.03 O.QZS O,�"1 6.9 1.17 0.16 O.1'7 O // 5.0 O 6 `j 0.32 0,32 7.1 2.3 Lcwq F O%"T 0.32 � o c a c o m '� s m O 0 m D O O cf 17 (+ O G) A 2 O `h -h m A ? N D S T m J eOf C - a c a - 2 o °c C 'J7A rn �.. ... 'f 1Af N IA 'O O 7 to A• N• A '-h t ? - Obi 0 _ "' O ct g g 12 5.o a.4� .9 0.43 0.16 0.59 7.1 4 Z 0.03 p.ozS o•21 g.S 2.4 0.34 0.25 n 01 • � N 13 5.0 o-(A .9 0.04 0.m o.38 1.1 Z•7 0.03 o.oZr, 0-le, 7.z o.� 0.08 0.30 `n 0 !4 5.0 0.16 .9 o.Iy o.i4 7.1 1.0 0.03 O.OZ5 ().13 15.0 O.,q o.OS o.d9 ut.1 !5 5.0 O.'73 .9 0. , 0.66 7, I A 7 LOW PO1NT 0.66 s 16 5 O.0 •I'7 G3 0.11 0.13 ©.z4 7.1 I.? o.Q4 A o.o29 O.Iq 5,'7 0-7 0. 10 0.14 m � �1 « V �17 5.0 o•13 .9 a.t G T I -4, t.-ovv poINT z o :° Q 0.41 az2 a63 7.1 4,5 Law PO trJT A •1 G 19 5.0 a.36 .9 10.3Z 0.32 7.1 2.3 0.0115 0,0 o.z1 G,9 1.14 0�16 0.16 -• o � 20 ti.o 0.19 ,9 0.17 7.1 2.4 0.03 0•03 0.18 G.Ii 1.05 3 � Z 1 1-7,0 o•z7 .9 Q.zq ai8 oA2 7.1 3.0 0.03 0.025 0,19 7.15 cn 0 ZZ 5.o C. 006 0.10 0.18 -7,1 1,3 a,oq p.ozS o.%3 5.2. 0.46 _ W ���ioiiii�iiiiiiiiifii PREPARED BY. DATE: f' FUSS&O�NEILL SH.NO. am., � �� of 4 MFD 8-2 c)O : MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT CHECKED BY. DATE: PROD.NO. STORM SEWER SYSTEM / TCl • DESIGN MANE IDEPO-r � FS � 1 Ky M M M •N• p o r3 a p_ o Q 1"o HEADWATER co � 0o p ' FULL CAPACITY N llj t� to � GO ti it ' AVERAGE VELOCITY �`9, � L6 tt � c� ►s` to cn is SLOPE gj 8 p Q o O 0 O O v O O LENGTH OF PIPE . N 00 PIPE SIZE N �_, N_ tV 00 ?1 N 0 IN SYSTEM ('j? 6\ RAINFALL ItITENSI Y—: r Lip' SUt: OF Al IN N Qo C: SYSTEM o o O 0 0 _ 0 cYi 0 N t� IS'- C- AI ENTERING m r �' a p CATCH EASIN O O 0 0 0 0 0 N O — ACCUMULATED TIME d N 0 p 0 L6 1-6 r r N N — N I TIDE IN PIPE o ol 1 0 0 0 ' 10 o TIME TO INLET L6 r LINE SEGMENT N �. lc% `4 C 00 o PREPARED BY: DATE: FUSS&Q'NEIL L SH.NO OF /Aro 8-z-� MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT CHECKED BY: DATE: PROJ.NO. _ 90-Z5 I STORM SEWER SYSTEM ,, // TOWN • DESIGN f-foME �FPOT iYIRNn��srF,e th fN m cry M on t� •N• �HEADWATER ON � 0 i o M �- FULL CAPACITY AVERAGE VELOCITY N �- Li% 0 v, SLOPE O 0 N o 8 Q o a 'o 0 o O o 0 0 0 00 N 0 O �3 LENGTH OF PIPE - N PIPE SIZE N 0 IN SYSTEM O _ �► �• - N N IRAINFALL 1 tITENS I Y-• � C- SUNG OF A I I N a., r co r p SYSTEM 0 _ N. O 0 p At ENTERING c N CATCH EASIN o _ O p o 0 U i ACCUMULATED TIME N 0` O It Ln � Is(" ►t� I!� tf\ lfi In L -T �► - TINE IN PIPE Ni 0 0 0 0 o a TIME TO INLET `r M 1 LINE SEGMENT T N N �� o PREPARED By. OATS: FUSS&O'NEILL SH.Na OF MED S�Z- N MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT 3 CHECKED BY: DATE: PROJ.NO. STORM SEWER SYSTEM TUN`N,{ DESIGN 14/0M C pFPO-T ! rgfjmr57ry m (9 n') •N• � p o a o o a z5 i HEADWATER (h 0 N 00 N m FULL CAPACITY cl �j cn to n} ch ' .(y? oo N [- c AVERAGE VELOCITY np n� �D _ N mot• SLOPE � p � O 0 O o p 0 p 0 O O 0 O ' LENGTH OF PIPE . PIPE SIZE fp "N - `N N N 0 IN SYSTEM �: Q _ (y) M N N RAINFALL INTENSi Y� SUN OF Al IN SYSTEH O N 0 p O cn m Al ENTERING a" 00 CATCH EASIN 0 p p. 0 O O O 4 ACCUMULATED TIME O 00 � r N N IJ -TjT19E IN PIPE a p o o o a p p 0 0 TIME TO INLET (r (r Lr% u' M LINE SEGMENT r r co � co rj N 1 PREPARED BY. DATE: FUSS&O-NEILL f"O SH.NO. ,E� OFL' MED 8'Z-9O J� MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT CHECKED BY: DATE: PROJ.NO. 90- ZC5 STORM SEWER SYSTEM TCrNN DESIGN AmE OFF:10T �''f�n►^t�ESi e o on O � HEADWATER m ni m p cfJ FULL CAPACITY Q M AVERAGE VELOCITY 7 m N M 6a SLOPE w O 4 N O C7 0 LENGTH OF PIPE - d PIPE SIZE N N N 0 IN SYSTEM N N N RAINFALL INTENSI Y`6 �- w SUI! OF At IN 0 SYSTEH UN m on At ENTERING p `� D CATCH EASIN 0 o p O ACCUPU LATED TIME T19E IN PIPE N O o O TIME TO INLET to LINE SEGMENT N I N N N -� FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY ME-L) 6-I-90 C)Q- IZE6 SAM S YJk0LESA-LE STOP-rn rDPAINA(f aLCUlF1 ►- cwS fHEEof NO. 6 Cs 1 To-ML IDRAINACF AR-F-A = 4 .IF qcr�� PAVEmFNT = 0.0 Ae. ;HC. C = ,25 ' L _ Goo, Tom' 20 MW Q - 4,9,N xQ - 4�9 - 51 c.Fs CC3 Z TTAL DeAINAC- AREA 0XZ AC"S ' Pi v\X" fJT - p•12 Ac. c-QASS = 0.0 Qz5 p.1Z >< 0.90 X 7.1 = 0.8 CF5 C6 3 'DpAIrjAc.c APFA - p.i5 AcQ�S PAVFMF_"-t O,I AC, D AINACE Ap-m Q. AC 1 PAVt vv�I-�IT - 0.06 AC C = •90 s2AS S 0,?8 AC _ wF161� o c T 9 0.54 i �0,84 . 30 T = ZO MIN ' QL5 C.84 X ,30 Y cF s 1 -rm FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. g engineers O consultinBY BY MEo g I-90 9 6 0-IZ SHEET NO. 2 of 6 1 .04 AcP-FS _PAVErnEwT AC._ -.__. ___ _._ CLASS ©•�l AC. •04 1.014 1 IC _ 2-0 MirJ 2 QZ� 1 0� x •33 Y �.9 = i.7 cry 6 �oTAt DRRiNflf APA = 0.FY ACf'-Ej ��vEtiMEM7 = o•�� Ae ; - �o cf?AJs 0,�3 AC. C- • 21 �+ 2;5 (p'73 _ C= ZO M I N ►o;� oeA►NgE,c A�-A = O.99 Ac?,P-S PAVEmF•-NT = O.Z0 AC C- .�-)0 c,?ASS = 0179 AC c : •Z5 1�0�-9 ) T = ZoM+N 2 4,9 �N Qt5 O.3% x 4 9 s r -� FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY N1Et7 8-I-90 ate- 126 SHEET NO. 3 of 6 C3 S 70TA-L A,NAc� Apxlq = 0.0'7 AcPfS ._.. PAvFmF"T 0,04 AC PASS = 0,03 AC c i5 + 0•o4 0113 \N F 16 47co C C)o .01 )+ .1;5 --o,o� R- 7.1 �N qz = 0,07 x o•56 . rL I = C• 3 CFS C$ 9 �pTAi� 17P-AiNA�J< ARf ©.33 AcPES PAVEmf',N-i - O 33 AC Qz5 0,33x .90 x 7.4 - ZA CF,S Cs 10 _ Tcra� 't ,a,�AFE Ap-eA = o.49 AcF-Fs PAVFwtF+�z 0,40 AC Qz7 - 0,49 x ,90 Y 71 = 3,1 eFs ICt3 II TTAL iOPAINAC-r AP-F-9 : 0.63 A-PE-S PAvF F—NT - (3•63 AC 1 Qtti 0.63 x ,Rio x 7.1 - 4.0 CFS C� ►2 to►�t I�PAf r rA� 1 PAVCV61F.N'I q.z� CRASS - a,18 C- •Z5 wF�s�t o c ,9010.�3 �+ .75 (o. a ) - 0-C3 _ QZS 0.43 x . 63 x 6•S 1 •S CFS USE ' PA VF.-►vl Ft,4 T Qz C)z;: x 7 1 x ,9 0 7 1,G C1=S 1 Al FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY i✓Ir-D 8-►-g0 90_ ►Z6 SHEET NO. 4 of 6 CB 13 -To-TA-L. 1' R NAEE AFeA = 0,55 Acp-FrS _. PAqE AC, •90x 7.1 = 3,5 cfs C� 1� to-mt, 'D,AIr4Acx- Aa#t = a5Z AcRcs PgvcrnF,�z = 0,52 Ac. .90 15 I anq C)Mi ry A C.r AR-F-A = 0,515 Acnf7 s PAvr,N f-�,-r - 0.55 Ac. 0,55 `30 x 177,1 cFs ' c$ 16 -1-0'tAt �✓12flINAE F Ai? ,A ©.Z3 Acf F- c ' PwFNFr\,l - C) 23 AC. Qz C).Z3 x ,90 x 7,1 = 1,7 CFS CS 17 7707P�L C>4q inaAE-' A�F.A : 0,56 AC.PFS PAvFnnF►v7 056 AC. 7,1 = 3.6 cFs ' C6 1�) IC-,AL -xt1NAE,r ARf;,A - 0,74 AtRF. S PAV�41AE4,jT - 0.'74 I)c 4�5 : 0.-74 A ,90 Y 7.1 7 cFs 1 1 -� FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY A4F 8-1-90 `)U- IZF, SHEET NO. S of To`AL )` IN WC APV� = o, i I Ace s x PAvFfMF.4IJT = 0.07 AC t o•►� �5 = 0,11 x 7. 1 X •55 = CQ CFS CRASS W F_fC�4 � C - 9 /.Oa i � 2 ,O� 0 0,17 x 7. 1 X . 56 O.'- c-Fs ' Ci3 ZI --7a7Ai- 7P-A„r tAcr- 4-F-A 0,37 Acpr-S pAv�v�rr.t7 - 0,3`-1 AC 0.-Y7 x 7,1 = 2A cr-s D?-A t"F�Cf- /-FAA Q,OC-� cF5 pAvF mr N7 = 0.06 4C QZ7 0,06 x •90 x 7.1 = 0.4 Cps Ca 23 PAVFtmEt.►T 0.07 AC �. r,I)S O.OZ AC /oz l o.73 Qti 0.09 x 7, 1 x ,73 = 0.57CF-S usr POvC414GN'T Q zy 0,07 K 7, 1 j, .90 = a./A cf5 FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O consulting engineers BY BY IYIED 8-1-90 90 -iz6 SHEET NO. of 6 a -.. C& 2A I6 1 AiNAC-� A�f�l o,II AC�frS 1 PpW V\ FF4, -r 0,1 I AC Ct3 Z� is -,L 7-eAINac-C ikA = 0,06 Ac9fs PAVF MF�T = O,a6 AC 0,4 CFS CZZG1 O-1-At )j?4q i N A 6•f AP-E-A = o•2,E) ACPF S PAvrmcfZ o.Zb Ac ' Q� - O•zb x ,y X �, I _ I.?cis Z? 1i L 17+�H�rvAC,rf O Z© ACP4 5 PFlVFrnF<"-r 0.ZC3 AC Qz5 0,Zo x , 9 x TI = 1�3 cF5 � c > c o m a A m o m �� 0 ... m m 3 cf -h er A N D �• T C» rn ,� rn�rn G o �• 'h -h m �+ O t: m ref C C "I •� C N tf• -p 't1 N lb m 7 � co a - o I -I 0 -h } to 3 to e1 to N A co 0 'X t 7 ra y O mrrn I2. 7 O,43 .63 o.zcl (3-27 6.5 I. B O.o3 O.OZ5 0.15 6.Z 0.79 O.IZ C).15 . to 13 5' 0.55 °10 0.50 0.50 7. 1 3,5 LOW POIMT p,Sp cn a 14 S 0.5Z •20 0.477 0.4'T 7.1 3.3 .LOW POINT 047 ut�.. IS 5 0.55 •9O 0.50 050 7.1 3.5 L-ow POINT o.rj0 s V1 Z 16 5 O•Z3 •90 o.z► 0.33 7.1 2.3 Low Po►ti1 T a 33 a 17 5 0.56 .90 0.50 0-50 7. 1 3.6 Low POINT o �1 z 1S 5 O•74 90 0.67 0.67 7,1 -4.7 Low P01NT 0,67 A A n 19 5 0.11 55 046 oog 7.1 4.6 ©.O> 0.025 0,09 3.7 O,IZ o.oZ 0.06 o 20 5 o.17 .56 0.10 0.11 7, 1 O.r7 o.o5 O.ozS 0.10 �.► 0.20 0.03 0,08 z • 2 2 o 21 5 O.3`1 90 a•33 0,33 7. 1 2.4 LOW POINT 22 5 0.06 .90 o.or 0•05 7•I 0,4 0.05 o.oz5 0.08 3•Z 0.06 0 70 w ' PREPARED BY: DATE: FUSS&O'NSLL MEN 8-I-90 =50MANCHIESTER. CONNECTICUT SH.NO. OF 3 CHECKED BY. DATE: ' PROINO. 90-I Z6 GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS C TOWN 1M�5 OLESA Le / I�NC.1�-E5iE2 A[ Entering Catch 00 Basin Q O O O O 0 O O O LD Al Bypassing Inlet 0 0 N O 6 O O 0 Q Bypassing Inlet N N �" O p o O p ' ' :l i dth of Flow - Q' Depth of Flow = a0 at putter O O p 6 Ln Cross Slope of d Shoulder Z Z O Z Z 2 � 0-O. a � N Grade of Gutter 3 p O O � 3 �'`� 3 ?� g o Q o g g 0 o g o C to Inlet — 00 O G, N — O 6 O ' R Q` — — C, c a� a 1 nfa 1 1 1 ntens 1 t It � � ,T �: Q Q � L Total Al O NO 0 M j O,n 0 0 0 $ � Sum of Al O ' Al O. N c°R ►ter 116-: 0 o O 6 6 6 0 0 Runoff CoefficientN � co m m no LP L Area in Acres O N 0 C. 0 �D 10 0 0 0 O 0 O O O ' Time to Inlet Ln V% O 0 0 4 N 11, LCI Inlet Number .y m . N pQ P O I%4 Cross Slope of Shoulder 11 �1���111111111111 ��NI�1�1�1111111111111 PREPARED Yam:• DATE:B-I- 90 f-p FUSS&O'NEILL SH.NO. 4 r YANCHESTEII. CONNECTICUT OF CHECKED .BY: DATE: PROJ.NO. STORM SEWER SYSTEM TOWN DESIGN SAmIS vV�lo ��cF /Vl ANCdF-S7F-e ' ('n - M M •N• O Q Q O O p O O O 0 O ei n O p HEADIIATER o0 6� O M O p N N — CA N Go N rA . FULL CAPACITY AVERAGE VELOCITY m � L `9 r c�i ao 00 0� ao N _ cn N tiU r' SLOPE O O O o 0 'O g O O O O O 0 of of LENGTH OF PIPE . O O .4- 0 mo IN PIPE SIZE N N N tP ►r a0 0 IN SYSTEM N M �p RAINFALL 1NTENSI -- SUI! OF A l I N O O m SYSTEM ' At ENTERING p O `D C' O CATCH BASIN s 0 O p O 0 O O O 0 0 0 co ACCUMULATED TIME CP_ (\j S N ' O_ N v- Tt1:E IN PIPE o 0l o 1 O 01 1 o o 1 v TIME TO INLET 2 V) ON N O b LINE SEGMENT U m N t4 CL a0 PREPARED BY. DATE: _ f" FUSS&O-NEI.LL SH.NO SAFE) a_' 90 21NZJO MtANCHESTER. COHHECTICUT - OFq CHECKED .BY: DATE: PROD_No. 9©-126 STORM SEWER SYSTEM Ta NN DESIGN HEADWATER N m O O N - � 1 � - FULL CAPACITY co AVERAGE VELOCITY uj �; � r ,. SLOPE 8 p a o O o 0 6 0 0 0 o a 0 LENGTH OF PIPE - O 0 -N Q` PIPE SIZE O N to N n1LD 0 IN SYSTEM C• - N - C�- all �y) RAINFALL INTENS1 )�-: t: SUN OF All IN SYSTEM � 0 O - O O N O Al ENTERING m �_' �, Id- 0 m CATCH EAS 1 t1 Lo 0 0 6 O O 0 0 O a o ACCUGIUTAT£D TIME O N � m tP 0 r 0` _ N �f1 l!7 11� • 4 M M tr N N Tif•.E 1N PIPE p p o 1 0 0 0 v 0 0 TIME TO INLET LA In in Ln In ►D �r) ►� LINE SEGMENT ? to It IS` N O ` PREPARED BY: DATE: Q_ _ .l" FUSS&O'NEILL SH.No pF MEO 8 ` l0 f O MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT CHECKED 8Y: DATE: PROJ.NO. STORM SEWER SYSTEM TawN DESIGN SAM'S VJA0LC5ALE Au'XA� rsTre .N. c m M M M I K M m o q o o a o 0 0 H EAOl9ATER O �+ d- � m m I 0 Q cn Lo �fj r FULL CAPACITY N tr' L N = r N 1�9 N (h tV j AVERAGE VELOCITY `') Q Q co M CC) cv m oo cv Q` SLOPE o p g o © S a O O O O o 0 O p LENGTH OF PIPE . ClJ N O N N q3 4' o PIPE SIZE N 'N N =� dD N N O 0 IN SYSTEM m p m m RAINFALL INTENSI Yc- SUt! OF Al IN co co �}- SYSTEM p O O O tAl ENTERING OL8 c 0 O N CATCH EASIN O o p p O 0 O � ACCUMULATED TIME fi O N cy? �- Ln N cn N TIME IN PIPE N — 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 TIME TO INLET to 10 In n Lo N ►!' Ln LINE SEGMENT 0 co N N N N 'N N N N PREPARED BY. DATE: _r"- FUSS&O'NEILL sH.Na OF/4 - MED 8-I-9O YANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT CHECKED BY: DATE: PROJ.NO. STORM SEWER SYSTEM ► TOWN 5A DESIGN rn 's WNo�ESAtE }Nc�{�sr�2 H EA0IIATER O m Q N m FULL CAPACITY Q. AVERAGE VELOCITY o6 O ao 4` SLOPE p p �• p a p o LENGTH OF PIPE . � �p �p N PIPE SIZE - m 0 1N SYSTEM N Lc% RAINFALL 1NTENSI Y� t SU1: OF A i I N r SYSTEM ON ui O .19 A[ ENTERING O N a_0 00 CATCH EASIN a O 0 O ' f 4 ACCUPULATED TIME 00 N — T19E IN PIPE o O TIME TO INLET Ln Ln Lo LINE SEGMENT N o N N N N t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX H i � y TRIO XEQ 03-11-11 11:36 BUGGIE 11111 POND 11 18 JOB i SUMMARY REV PC 09/83(.2) PAGE 5 SUMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSEC?IONS AND STRUCTURES FOR ALL STORMS AND ALTERNATES XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM N()MBERS.......... ID (SR MI) 99 STRUCTURE. 1 ..Is ALTERNATE 1 42.45 Nt.'i£r&IATE 1 102.49 -ALZERtt#ll'E 1 64.74 j 1 167.20 -305.01- +■� ;�, - �(A�! �fkEXPECTED-RECt��B(tNDtIGNORED) »> �� � k •i TR20 XEQ 03-25-89 I1:36 BUSSIE STOWE POh"'i, 87 28 JOB I SUMMARY REV PC 09183(.2) PAGE 4 SUMMARY TABLE : - SELECTED RESVULTS OF STAVDRRD AND EXEC(.�IIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE IORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(f) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT-TOP )(YDROSRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROSRA?E WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD (LAIN ANTEC MAIN �N PRECIPITATION - PEAK-DISCHARGE STRUCTURE- CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE HOIST TIME --- RUNOFF ID OPERATIO)( AREA 4- 1:OND INCREM -MIN AMOUNT DURATION "AMOUNT ELEVATION TWE 1(ATE :RATE (SQ !!I) W) #hRl (IN) (HR) -(IN) m 3 `: `=: 5) ICSM) ALTi= NATf 1 sw. -99 xSECT�ON 1 TNDFF .04 3 2 .15 .0 6.-90 24.40 _5.-65 .ISECTIM 2- XW[OFF -04 3 2 .15 ._0 b.90 -24.--00 3.99 I2.30 44.74 1849.4 ISECT40K 3 ADDHYD lim -3 2 .15 .0 -6.-90 24.00 -4:90 -- IZ31 -46?;10 ;M.& 'ISEC74ON -4 INMW . ..10 3 -2 . 5 .0 6.90 34.00- 5.30 2 8 168 -103.y -ISECTIW '.I 319 .18 3_ 2 .V5 .0 6.,90 24.00 5.13 0 .305.01 1=B l bry ' ERE _ 1 M 3 2 -15 .0. -a.50 �4:00 4.B3 i40� �:. b2,'45- :0 AV 1 i i .. i - I , 9• �L•'it t:" .•. .s•%� �.t .:.ice,-t 'J.��'.i/.••... .'�i1���'�i�:0•..._ IR20 XEQ 03-25-89 11:3b fiU66IE ..... POND 67 28 30B 1 PASS 1 REV PC 09/831.21 PAGE 3 21.00 ELEV 136.65 136.79 136.73 136.67 136.62 136.57 136.52 -136.747 " -136:43 " ' 136.37 22.50 DISCH6 18.47 17.89 17.33 16.80 16.29 15.81 15.35 14.92 14.49 14:04 22.50 ELEV 136.35 136.32 136.28 136.25 136.21 136.18 136.15 136.12 136.10 136.07 24.00 DISCH6 13.66 13.50 13.43 E3.23 12.90 12.51 12.06 11.56 11.03 10.54 24.00 ELEV 13b.04 136.03 136.03 i35.01 05.99 135.96 135.93 135.89 i35.85 135.81 25.50 DISCH6 10.04 9.55 9.09 8.63 8.20 7.80 7.41 7.03 6.68 6.35 25.50 ELEV 135.77 135.73 IM70 135.66 135.63 135,40 135.57 135.54 -135.51 -135.48 27.00 SISCHS 6.03 5.72 5.44 5.16 4.90 4.66 - 4:42 4.20 3.99 -.3.79 27.00 ELEV 135,F% IM 44 135.41 135.39 135,37 135.35 M.-34 M.02 135:30 M29 28.50 'DISH- .3.160 3.42 3.24 3.318 2X- 2A 2.44 -L51 2M -2.26 Y8."50 .135.27 135.26 1=4 135.23 135M 13.5.21 M-20 135.19 .4m 135;18_ 35.17 30.E 31I 2:15 -2.0 1.94_ 4A4 1.75- V-66 1-8 1.50 1.3z- 30.00 ELE1I 135.16 135.15 135.14 135.33 135�13 135.12 135.11 135:89 135-8 135.6 3L.50 DISC"�!fi 1.28 1.22 1.16 1.10 .04 .99 M .89 . 5 1 3L30 -ELEV 135.09 935.09 135.E 135.08 11LO 115.47 135:07 135.06 135.46. #35.05 31ISM- .77 .46 .62- .59 :sb _.53- X .48 j tom;n5 tF�- •ic,?L 135. 13v. m.03 i35:03 135:03 33~ f efl- 135:05 135a5 Ali -f E6: I35.46I35.11i �`32 -MIM sue. A2 M-02 i35.42= X941 ' TiSCHB« .27 y •ZZ s3`1 .24. .19 sI7 E1.Elt;; 135�i 335<0 i35. i_ 35 I1 01 T35.01 0t 5 t- ISCH$= - .1�- •[3 .1 _ .11 .11 a30 . .4I 5=w- Wtoo 135:00� 135.00 3}ISGf16 ,! .10 0 i8 "I35.410- 1�5:X -IrAo :m 00 135 44 535.4� -1�5.i)0 =DISC9rr .10 :-It. ..-M .off .10 .14. -I0 .10 0. ELEV 135.06 135Y00_ 134,99 434.99 "1'34;99 134.99 13!, 134.99 134:94: 134 9q `^ 4Z:O0 DISCH6 .1a .10: -10 :1D .10 .10 .10 .IO ELEV- -134.99 134:99 134,39 134.99 134.99 134.99 134.39 1134.99 134.99 134.99 4 a0: :D1SCH6 ,14. .10- to .I0 .10 .10 .ib .10 .10 .10 43:50 fIEV 134.99 WC79 134.99 :34-." 1i4.99 t34:99 134.49 134.9i 134.98-- 134:98. i A RUROF�VOL13l1E.AADVE BASEFLGii 4.83 itATERSHED INCHES, Sb3,67 CFS`HRS, #b�6 ACRE==EE7q BASrFLOii = .00 IFS WMORD 10 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATIWENDCiSP UNPUTAIIDRS-IMMKITED FOR PASS 1 -E ECi13-IVE CWROLXPERAMN-fltD M 1 DID - C- 1 1 - � R20 XED 03 2. S9 11:36 EUSSIE STONE FOND 87 28 JOB 1 PASS REV PC 09/83(.2) PAGE 1 E EXECUTIVE CGN RDL OPERATION INCREM !FAIN TINE INCREMENT = .15 HOURS RECORD 18 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPU'T FROM XSECTION 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID -STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 6.90 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE-N.= 3 ANT. ))MIST. COND= 2 A'-TERkA,c NO,.= 1 STORM NO.--99 MAX TIME INCREMENT= -.15-HOURS - OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION Of:;PUT HYDROGRAPH= A AREA= .04 9 M1- TXPUr-RID(OfF CURVE=49. 1.I3lE IF I:OM�ENTRATIW- -X XUR.S INTERNA? WflrueRAPP. TIME TNCREMENT= .OM HOURS PEAK Tri.(ElHRS) _WAK DISCHARSEom .1 --AK UEVATION(FEETI 12.31 402:49 ARUNOFF) 24,i 7- 4.� (RUNOFF) 1 itUXOFF JW9RSHED_D06,_ 4 r, # Ffi I{RS, i2.43 ACRE ASE ( �0 -IPERATHM-A. 9WFCRASS-SECTi(kN 12' _ ' .4""l MT ItUMOFF CURVE-74% ' CIF CONGWRATION- .,38.-IOft - uTEI m.WOROSRAPH TIME INCREMENT= -:A507- -PEAK TW3l+RS) TEAK DISCHARSE(CFS) -PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) - 12.-0 64.74 (RUNOFF) 15.06 5.03 (RUNOFF) 24.15 3.48. (RUNOFF)-. :. .. RUNOFF VOLUME AB VE $ASEFLUW.= 3.99 WATERSHED-INCHES, 90.03: 7.44 ACRE- EETf �BASEFL`ON = 00.7CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTIOX 3 IMPUI HYD."�ul°SRAPHS= 4,5 OUTPUT HYDROGRAW<6_ PEAK 'xE(HRS) PEA'). DISCHARGE(CF5) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) i2.31 167.20 (NULL) : 4; 6.20 (NULL) 1c..; 5.62 (NULL) 23.46 3.26 (NULL) 24.16 7.99 MULL) RUNOFF VE:.UY"t ABOVE SASE71UW = 4.90 WATERSHED INCRES, 246.78 CFS-HRS, 20.39 ACRE-FEET; SASEFLIX = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 4 - OUTPUT HYDRC•SRAP0 4 ARIA= .10 SD MI IN?UT RUNOFF CURVE= 86. TIME OF CONCENTRATION= .88 HOURS 1 INTERNA: HYDROSRAPH ?IME 1KCREMENT= .1173 HOURS ffiffffffff{fiffff80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOSYM111*11MUffff ! JOB TR-20 FULLPRINT SUNKARY NOPLD'S TITLE 001 . 3U86IE STONE POND 87 28 - - - -- ------'-----'- '-- 5 RAINFL 3 .20 8 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 8 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 8 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.027 0.029 8 0.031 0.034 0.036 0.038 0.041 9 0.043 0.046 0.049 0.05i 0.054 M60 0.063 0.066 0.069 11 -0.072- 0.075 0.079 0.082 0.085 .8 0.089 0.093 0.097 4.143 0.:00 :0..1i5 0-.,I M27 -0.134 M40 I $ 4.1m 0.135 4.163 0.-171 _ 0.180 V 1.189- =0.1179 0.2L0 0.2Z2 M35 -8 -0.250 0.2" 0 287 .317 V.363 8. -0500 0.638. -0.689 -0.T14- 1.734 .)OMI 0.766 -0.779 4 790 0-801 -8 S- Z1 4.821 0.229 !O -0.845 1 453 :k8b0 0.86T Cm 0.880 -1 4A -0.192 -0.998 4.408- u w. '.�.� -��.-, ...• 1J; _� _. �.-0�{��yy24 ��3'3t �0..�435. j0- - ._ � t -,Dvw VMS 0:�t67W a -0.467- �0,�9� -0: 83 =0:989 -0.99i 0i993_ 0:995 -O.�m V..990 8 1.0- 1.10. 1.0 1.0 1.0 9"£NDTOL 3 STRUCT- -01 8_ 134.0 0.0 0.0 8 135.0 .1 3.0 136.0 13.0 6.1 137.-0" 28.5 9.4- r 138.0 =42.0 13.-0 8 139.0 51.2 16.9 { _8 140.0 58.8 21.3 8 141.0 63.2 76.3 9.£NDTB1. -6 RUNOFF .1 .001 4 .043 89. .43 1 1 d l LI(OFF-A 002 5 .-035 74.0 .3E i i b-ADDRYD-4-003 4 5 6 1 1 .i 6 MMOFF-1-°004 4 .103 86.0 .88 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 005 4 6 5 1 1 6 RESVOR-2 01 5 7 134.0 ENDATA Arl FUSS&O'NEILL-- PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. ccnsulting engineers BY � BY Z SHEET NO. of -7i A it -7 Ali 1 -77 -,A S 4.. ..... ..... 4 —4 T -T 7 1 -7 41- -it --T LL -4-41 z t I T'l s i i • MEN �n■�.��■����■■���� ■■ NONE■■ ■■■■■■■■NEn■N ■■si■�■NiE s.► r -no H■NNE■■� ■■■■�■ IN ■■C:...�...■E■■E■ ■ � rem 0 NNE■■rrr�■■EC!. . . ■tnn■■■■ ■■u�■E■Nn■No ■ ■m no ■■■■SO HMO ■■n� ■ i■n■■ n ■ ■E■N■■■En■N ° ■■■■■■■ ■ ■MERE ONE ■■■■■■■■■MEMO �1t ■ ■ �■N■■E■NEE ■ ■■®i ■■■■■En T!E 3 ■■OEM ■ONO■■■■■NNE ■ ■■ ■ �. ONO r■ ■EEr ■■■ ■■■ En■■ NEON ■En■r�E�iE■■NNE HIM N q ■ ■n■■■■NON �■ ■ ■O�N■n 6 ■®■■■n N!!■roof Ta", ARM n� yin i ■■!!■■■■■■■■■■■■/■■■■MEMO nEms �11■■■■■■n■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■! ■■■ 0■MWN t!■■■■!■■■■!■■■■■■■■!■MI N■■a•11 � ■ ■n■■■■■■■■ ■■■ENE■ ! ■■■■■■■■■!■o■■■■ IMEM ■■!■!!!!■ !! ° i■■■ _ n■■■■■■■■■■ j� ' ■■!!■■■■■■■■ ■N!■■■■■■MEMO ■M■■■■■■!■!■■■■MEM !! ■■■■■■■■ !■! ■ !■■■■ . ��!■! ■! ■ ■ ■N!■ !■■■■!■!■NN■■ ■■f■■ ■■■■■■■■■!!!■■n■!■■■ ■ ■!■■■ !■ ■ ■0 ■ ■v■M�■M■■!�!■;n■ v N■ ■■■!■!N!!■■!ON ■■■■sn!li�iii■■ ME ME ■■!■■ ■ E ■ d ONE SION ■ MEN f FUSS&O'NEIL = PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. O donsulting engineers BY a� BY D l 1Z`f - B�GG-t i;70w& Pool SHEETNO. 3 of - +� ' ! f I r04 LA 1 s ! Ir ! ! ` i I ! 4t -�-- _ - - - —64 71 c!lk X�1A FUSS&O'NEILL- PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY J-1t BY qlz S-TOWE- SHEET NO. of pit, 1 1 -7. OAL I wO 0�ta C 4- 1 L I a ----r--T- tL I 4 t 4-4 14; t y �A, FUSS&O'NEILU PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. .7 O consulting engineers BY BY R4V- SHE 6—TO W I- ET NO. of's, I i Air? Lit" J Ai tntp I P, tj !1W i ' i ,,�-�_.>�. � �tD�_'�.s'3 :moo �'0:��3��S�,► ae -���_ , I J I i 4F= if _ I f el 4- "1 2- 4-ti x Z W a a a STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION •` April 4 , 1990 Fusd & O'Neill Inc. 1P�7 � 146 Hartford Road 6/p�� v� U Manchester, CT 06040 Ft"SS . O. Attention: Jay Giles '�- 1.� E r Re: Manchester I-84 Associates The Crossroads at Buckland Hills Project No. 86-481 Town of Manchester Buggie Stowe Pond .Dear Mr. Giles: The staff has reviewed the information you sent to the Department regarding the proposed development know as the Crossroads at Buckland Hills (Project No. 86-481) in Manchester on March 22, 1990. Based on the proposed stormwater controls, and the size and nature of the project, we have determined that this discharge of stormwater runoff - cannot reasonably be expected to cause pollution. This being the case, the Department will not require a state permit under Section 22a-430 of the Connecticut General Statues at this time.- Since the Department is currently developing a program to best meet the goals of Environment 2000 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for stormwater discharges, in particular their_cumulative impacts, a general permit or registration may be required in the future. Please be advised that you are not relieved of the obligation to obtain any other authorizations as may be required by Federal, State of Local Laws or regulations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Bob Kaliszewski of my staff at 566-5903. Sincerely, Michael J. Harder Acting Director Bureau of Water Management MJH/REK/ar Phone: 165 Capitol Avenue • Hartford,Connecticut 06106 An Equal Opportunity Employer 0 x 0 Z W a a a M E M O R A N D U M To: Jay J. Giles, P.E. Vice President From:���j S.F. Mitchell, P.E. , Director of Traffic Engineering Date: August 2, 1990 Subject: Final Development Plan - Phase IA, IB, & IC "The Crossroads at Buckland Hills" A Portion of Land Use Area A We have prepared this memorandum to address the requirements of Paragraph (e) of Article II, Section 8.10.04 of the Town of Manchester Zoning Regulations regarding traffic conditions for a Final Development Plan. A Traffic Impact Report for the Preliminary Development Plan for the Buckland Hills project was submitted March 7, 1988, by Manchester I-84 Associates and John Finguerra as part of the Preliminary Plan Application. That original submittal was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission on June 20, 1988. In 1989, Manchester I-84 Associates and John Finguerra proposed revisions to the approved Preliminary Plan. The minor changes in generation caused by those proposed revisions were submitted to the State Traffic Commission and approved on May 16, 1989, (Certificate No. 874A) . The revised Preliminary Plan was subsequently approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 4, 1989. At this time, John Finguerra and Manchester I-84 Associat es are making application for a revised Final Development Plan for a portion of Land Use Area A. The initial Final Plan for this area included 239,000 S.F. of retail and 14,425 S.F. of office space. It was approved by the Commission on September 6, 1989. The proposed revised Final Plan now consists of 220, 500 S.F. of retail in approximately the same area. The traffic study submitted for the total development included roadway improvements which could reasonably be expected to be complete at the time the facility opened, including those improvements outlined in the Tax Abatement Agreement. Additional recommendations for improvements to the local roadway system were made in the Preliminary Plan of Development report which included an additional westbound right turn lane on Pavilions Drive. Improvements were also suggested at the Jay J. Giles (Memo) August 2, 1990 Page -2- intersection of Buckland Street and Pleasant Valley Road/Buckland Hills Drive. At this location, the addition of a southbound right turn lane and a channelized northbound right turn lane were recommended in order to improve the capacity of this intersection. All of these improvements have been constructed. The "external" traffic volumes utilized in the traffic rep ort for the Preliminary Plan correctly reflect the background traffic levels. No significant developments have been proposed which would substantially change these traffic volumes. Future developments would utilize this development's combined traffic volumes as a pre-existing condition. These recommendations have been incorporated into the State Traffic Commission Review, and have been approved and included in Certificate No. 874 A. The traffic generated by Phases IA, IB, & IC of Land Use Area A, together with the previously approved Phases I & II of Land Use Area D (Trammell Crow) will amount to less than 85 percent of the total traffic generated for the entire project. Therefore, it is our professional opinion that the traffic generated by these phases of this project will be satisfactorily handled by the above mentioned improvements, and adequate levels of service will be provided at all intersections surrounding the site. It is anticipated that the roadway conditions will be sufficient to provide safe and efficient travel for the traffic in the area. 86-481 0802A90RJB W X 0 Z W a a Q All FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT . O NO consulting engineers BY BY MFO 8-2-90 9©-I Z6 ' ` t SHEET NO. ��Ry �Ftc)FF �ArnS VJE�C,�ESAtF." I of �Op of �P?AME INVEQT T B�►L' �;�titT-AeY �E-wrp, t_ �J'TtZUC`t lzE 16P OF FP--AwfF �N�IEQ i A 14S,40 1>7,10 C3 i S .OO 1,57 6 0 C 146,00 D I41 7R 18 ' G I 3Q I , .• 3� 1 ■ ' FO-#110 V. x 0 Z W m a Q r ar rr ar rr �r r rr rr �r r rr rr r� rr ar �r +r rr FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY MED B-Z-`30 // SHEET NO. /O1'YIE DEPOT Z AIN-16C QMP5 I of 2 T? OF Ay11E S I MERTS - (-3i> or Fp-wc INLE7T Wq- QUtIE T 1N<<. C$ ! t 91 .25 ►88,25 CB 2 IC)I .25 Ia8.05 18'7.85 C13 I O Ca 4 1bl3.Z0 _ C3 5 189, Zo ►z..rl 18C,20 12"W I$5,70 C3 6 18g,50 183.55 15 .45 03 7 192.00 13" 32.Go Z4" 152.70 CPS 8 ; ►92.0 p 182.30 182.20 �3 9 185 130 1 v2.3o C Q 10 10ti 80 _ IDS"8Q Cg 11 184•00 ISI.00 ca 12 163,70 12"E 150,70 1bO,5-c) ' 12."5 t80.70 CEs 13 )82.40 179.40 rn.Zp ' C3 14 161•40 175,t5 i,"n 95 t C13 15 181150 19 r7 00 176.80 16 - ca 1'74.90 1'7 1,90 115" 121 .r7o C3 1a ►©I .50 IZ" 175,45' 16.20 ZA" 1'7 0.50 C3 19 1%7.t50 ' C5 w 156.00 183,00 t82 �O FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY MEP 8-2!-90 9G- r I OME DF`R?T � F_AtNA6 SHEET NO. BI f}1PS � of z ° S'f RJCiy�E_ i QP pF 1pAmE r4LF-r INV. LfT �NV. I'79.10 c.r3 ZZ 16'1,8 0 63,BO 163.6o 40 5 15 r 1.20 C15 Z4 155100 151,00 1T20.60 C8 z5 Ir70,00 146.00 d4h,80 M�1 t I98•ZO I a4�'i5 1�s1-•"1`� NW 4 145.gp 145.30 M 5 144.40 144-30 CE i 15-e.0Q 1 Ce z 177.00 C> 3 t43,80 FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CH O ECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY ' MFD 8-1-9O' 1�70-26 SA rn'S W F�O�ESAI ORA 1 N AC',E L[ MP5 SHEET NO. ' Z of z _ -- ``- L-�� -Vt� orFeJQry pptE$ L� INVEPTS �ComT. �JTK�cit1�F of- OF FFAmE' (NlF_T INV, �t)TLfT IN�� Ca 2i _ 2t8,zo Zo7,35 7sJ'7.15 Cb _22 220.20 ie"E 206.55 207,45 18"s 205-615 iz"W 216•35 _ C5 23 Z19.55 ' CB Z4 Z23.ZO Zc33. p Zo 9 3.'70 ' C3 25 ZZ2.50 Zoz,�5 zoz.75 CB 2 Z18.110 Zctz.o5 zC�t ,�S C5 27 Zz0.40 2,17,40 MN 1 2Z l.00 ,z"#! Z 17,10 zo 1.)15 5 ZOI.35 /M14 z 2Z0.gyp ZOO.35 ZOO.M .eE i CE 2 ZCO.op 174.50 FO-#110