Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Plan of Development
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR APR INLAND WETLANDS AND WATER COURSE 1 198 APPLICATION 0! INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY ACTION THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE RECEIVED BY THE INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY AT THE REGULAR- APPLICATION SCHEDULED MEETING ON THE SECOND MON- APPLICATION NO. �� y / DAY OF THE MONTH AT THE TOWN HALL. RECEIVED DATE ��3'��tJ / THIS APPLICATION MUST BE FILED IN TRIPLICATE I AT THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE SOUTH WINDSOR, AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO (if necessary) COMPLETED APPLICATION THE REGULAR MEETING DATE. PERMIT GRANTED DATE A SET OF PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN ENGINEER AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO PERMIT DENIED DATE THE REGULAR MEETING DATE. 1 PLEASE PRINT. 1. APPLICANTT.M.G. Construction Corp. TEL. NO. 388-1244 ADDRESS 1179 Boston Post Road CITY & STATE Old Saybrook, CT 06475 e en S. Stozus an A Bert J. 2. OWNER Sefsk3 , C'n-TY11St22S TEL. NO. 528-4742 ADDRESS West Road CITY & STATE South Windsor, CT 3. .LOCATION OF PROPERTY Southerly of Sullivan Ave.& i,?esterly of West Rd. NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS • Reference supporting documents and maps attached to application STATE CLEARLY AND BRIEFLY t 5. PURPOSES AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY,AND THE TIME ELEMENT INVOLVED: Applicant has filed application with Planning & Zoning Commission ( for zone change and n rat Plan Of 1)c_17P1 npm ni- unr3Pr MPA 7.nnP Section 4 .6 of Town Regulations, Copy of application is attached. ATTENTION: THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS APPLICATION IS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE ONLY WHEN ALL INFORMATION & DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. APPROVAL MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COM- MISSION. A FIFTEEN DOLLAR ($15) APPLICATION FEE IS REQUIRED, AND IT MUST BE SUB- MITTED TO THE AGENCY AT ITS REGULAR MEETING. T.M.G. Cpnstruc ion Corp. SIGNED: By (Applicant)Harold R. Cummi gs, It Attorney 14/454 a� - 0490 Revised 3/78 (Own r) Helen S. Stozus, T stee 00, Albert J. Spoky, Trustee J /7 t � CORM I65A QUIT4-XAIM DEED 295 TUTBLANII NL4 DIi Hl1•USi'Ai 01.ICk �Iac fi2 Z&ffleLtiw➢rinl Alb4 hers KiII10 O APR V 510 Pit Thai We, JOHN J. SETSKY, HELEN S. STOZUS, ANTHONY J. SETSKY and ' ALBERT J. SETSKY, all of the Town_of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut -- -- for divers good causes and considerations thereunt.o moving, especially for $10.00 and other good and valuable considerations, -- received to our full satisfaction of HELEN S. STOZUS and ALBERT J. SETSKY, both of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, as Co-Trustees, -- have remised, released, and forever quit-claimed, and do by these presents, for ourselves and/heirs, justly and absolutely remise, release, and forever QUIT-CLAIM unto thy• said our HELEN S. STOZUS and ALBERT J. SETSKY, IN TRUST, nevertheless, and for the benefit of the above-described JOHN J. SETSKY, HELEN S. STOZUS, ANTHONY J. SETSKY and ALBERT J. SETSKY, their -- heirs and assigns forever, all such right and title as We the said John J. Setsky, Helen S. Stozus, Anthony J. Setsky and Albert J. Setsky have or ought to have in or to a certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor, with all the buildings thereon, more particularly bounded and described as follows: North: by land now or formerly of Martin Jones; East: by West Road (fo:merly known as Foster Road) and land now or formerly of Mary Nichols; South: by land now or formerly of Robert L. Sadd; and West: by land now or formerly of George W. Bancroft, Estate; containing twenty-five (25) acres, more or less, and being the same premises described in a certain warranty deed of Frank Zilinsky, grantor, to Michael Schitzka, grantee, dated December 22, 1911 and recorded in the land records in the town clerk's office in the Town of South Windsor at Volume 16, Page 475 and also described in a certain certificate of distribution of real estate from the Estate of Michael Setsky, Sr., Deceased, late of the Town of South Windsor (also known as Michael Schitzka •••� . ��v o�0 k-A-bU.KAl'URY DIVISION „• `"i 10 CLINTON STRI-ET s . F.O. BOX 1688 IIARTFORD CONN. o61o1 SAMPLE INVOICE SAMPLES OF SEWAGE OR TRADE WASTE To be filled in by person collecting narnples From NAZAO?OUS MATERIALS HA,,AEEVEg &iUof �v Sample of sewage ( ). trade waste ( i;), sludge ( ), or Name of treatment plant RECEIVED Owned by Plant processes or treatment n T F4, 1P C Collected by 8-- --_ I - fthl�;'L at; ;iT UNIT ._: _ On Report to -Shipped on [ _ j Composite Laboratory Colledois Collected j Yes or j Miry. i Time of "Number Number Sample of i From j No Apart Collection 41 cAs,rnc�, � ►�7<oR � 5 A p I F F n!ntdr Jul r / •� c ` I I I 1 t 11j I7 :l No. and Bind of I3ottlee i a �. _ �- � /� 7" '.1 .`r: r-!,) ( ':� tic �x ,�j� •-' � , • Fr - � ! I. • rJ V. f � 13•r'. i-S J i pII ezcl.t Total Solids 1'0' cld Fixed Volatile Alkalinity as CaCO3 Chlorides as Cl �� g i '� --•K= --Y— Cyanlde as n Detergent as ABS F' .ioride as F Grease ' V, Aluminum as Al / Arsenic as As Cadmium as 'Cd O 03�b 0,000 01000 Cl^.ro iL-s as Cr 61 07 CoDrier as Cu Iron as Fe V Lead as pb t, -- 4 Mercury as Hg �- ? / n IdiCkel a3 IT .3 �) _ Silver as Ag Tin as Sn V Zinc as Zn �'� �, - ? t 0•� ----�A onia .N Nitrate .N , Ni i L,e Organic .Ik _. C.O.D. z IV c. R 3 0. Phenol CF L��• 49 1.1} V— V V f iJ p d"�Ty7r� ` 1 V'Sulfate as SO4 e ct sN CJ�. c� © o 1 VO �� !,J/� -��,�/ a �S S�> B • �-L�� ��p C'� /c C'L4�' �_i .—_�t.or f v J -- LAWNZATORY DIVISION 10 - 1'.0. Box 1689, Hartford, Conn. Of1Ui r t.j REPORT OF LABORATORY EXAMINATION i t Reported Specimen 1\o. C d-7 S _ _ Collectors No. To-wn of-_ Rel,ort of Examination of ' For Source Collected by _Collectrd on hr. M. Ree'd. hr. 1 l:uasnn for Examination e Th exam' n' � -—examination -ices the following results: HYDROCARBONS: Extracted &-Progra=ed Temp ���• .3 7o 'C ��XS, � Colu-nn S� Chromatograph 4 Range � e,� 1 Configuration 3 a Nu lr r of Ccrnponents ------------ C-P �,,d - Ident I fi cat!on f e Rr� �•taidard _ - - - - - -. . . �_ .�.. - - -- t - _ - C(�I1rJllion: /�/. S' /c> �� �s .1s 7`' f/ fi7'�� ,rp�v:�r �`� �� d t - v• _ ��.�y, irnr_turd, Conn OGltil LABORATORY M. BO."+S: Vapor Test Te p. C °C �c' S �` i:oli nn , t t w 4',✓c�, Temp. °C Colunn { : e Results expressed as Micrograms per Liter: 1 ComT)onent Con ccntratio, Component 2i'I'2I Co,�cen 2. YL AC-Tr.!E Methane — Butane MEIETHYI ALCOHOL Propane METHYL CELLOSOLVE ?-IEI'AM iso-BUTYL KETONE ACETONE ' K-YTHYL ETHYL KETONE C� / AMYL ACETATE — METHYL METEACRYLWE AMYL ALCOHOL TIETHYLE :E CHLORIDE iso-A2.f1'L ALCOHOL NONA.NE - r BENZENE iso-OCTANE BUTYL ACETATE. PENTANE BUTYL ALCOHOL PETROLEUM ETHER ._._ PROPYL ACETATE — iso-BUTYL ACETATE iso-BUIrIL, ALCOHOL iso-PROPYL ACET E s-BUTYL ALCOHOL - iso-PROPYL ALCOHOL CARBO'i ri-EiRACHLORIDE iso-PROPYL CHLOROB..INZ9-}E ^ n V CHLOROBUrANE TETi"2.ACnI,OR0--T3iYI.z'T r CHLOROFORM D7CH 0"OB-:2YZEITE I,,1,1-nrtIG`IT'.0:;0 .�LIA.0 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE - ETFYL ACETATE - ETiiYL ALCOHOL )r r XYLEZ (va,,T ) ETI3-YL BENZ IIE _ ETHYL ET-HER - XYLENE (ORulo) •`i'Fi"�'IZI2 CHLORIDEXYIWP E (pARA) ,lease S. Tucker Director MOM Kemron Environmertol Services _ 3570 North Avondole Avenue ° Chicogo.Illinois 60618 Telephone(312)588-8500 Laboratory No. 050680-3A C-i.A'I.ENT: Acme Resin Corporation of Forest Park, illi ois. &NPLE: One Taylor-Fenn sample submitted by client, received 5/6/80. RESULTS: Date Parameter Reclaim Analyst/ Analyzed Pnenol 0.03 Vg/ml .0 /5 8/80 LL pH* 6.97 5/7/80 LB Cadmitun <0.01 5/13/80 LL jig/ml Cd Nickel <0.05 5/13/80 LB ug/rnt Ni Lead <0.05 5/13/80 LB ug/ml Pb Arsenic <4.5 5/15/80 LB 1 g/1 As Chromium <0.03 5/13/80 LB ug/rnl Cr 'Copper <0.01 5/12/80 LB ug/m1 CU Zinc 0.02 5/12/80 LB ug/ml Zn 4MUM: Federal Register, Vol. 43,_ No. 243 - lbrAay, Deceiiber-18, 197a- * p?i taken after suspensicza of 100- gru of sample- in 1600 nil. R. water and stirred for 15 -minutes. - --------- - June 20, 1980 U;U1 Enviro .ntal services Lawrence Iarman Page 1 of 2 Lab %pexvisor cao [Sorg Werner Corporot;on AdrN"r stroHw OHKar Morreho ONO 235 5-2-cod Sheer(614)374-2222 Z.�A5790 , lot-.:.rotory Loco ncr±s; DA'^N ROUGE loutkAHA CHKAGO ILLINOIS FAlIMNGTON HILLS M) HWGAH MANETTA ORC) PORT NECrtEjTEka,5:.0 H, nbntl rt:ntl 3570 North Avonoo:e Avenue 3274p NOMI-w uern Hghwoy 235 Secob SrreN42i6Por e; 2036650 7,P 73 ;D'5 (312)588 8500 LP 60618 (313,b26.2426 rhp 43016 (6t4)374-2222 ZIP 457M (70)727-1 x k Kemron Env;ronmenrol Services • 3570 North Avondofe Avenue Chico90.HIM—60618 Telephone(312)588.6500 Laboratory No. 050680-3A continues CLIENT: Acn"-2 Resin Corporation of Forest Park, Illinois. S•L%TpLE: One Taylor-Fenn sample submitted by client, received 5/6/80. RESULTS: Date Pararneter Reclaim Sand-A- Analyst/ • Analyzed Barium 'Pg/m- Ba 0.1 5/29/80 LIV)M Selenium <4.7 5/28/80. LL/L,B 1-�g/I Se Silver <0.01 ug/ml Ag 5/29/80 LL/IB Page 2 of 2 cao Borg Worner Corpo(cr�on /.dmrNihOnvt CMice:"0-0.Ono 235 5ecod 5,-,(61 A)374-2222 ZIP 45750 lo'rYu�ory C✓cr.o.y: < :.�'+RO�_•:;E tOU`>a tiA - CHJCAGO IiUNO(S _ (312)Norm AvprrJpk Avg 32740 tiormwti� MAR E(tA O ttO PO((i NECHFS TEXA'_.:%� LP70:.JB (3t2)S68B500 Z•p '�tb '�" '�y 2355=CL,,d5,,, t2ibG;.nr.;(313)d26.2426 ip 4.,O15 (614)374 2222 2 4575J. 6611 5 Avpn p P 727-1664 LP 77CSi Y - DEPARTMENT OF EN IRU3,,', i 1. � ` ' ENTA� PROTECTION ' STATE OFFICE BUILDINGV•,;. IFopD. CONNECTJCUT 06115 i October �0, 198O Mr. H.W. Congdon ` ' Superintendent of Sanitation East Hartford Town San on itary Divisi ~. 121 Ecology 'j • , : . East Hartford, Connecticyt 0514$. a. .T`•s't-,'` .. :,.. '- _- _ _ `TF -a�- . :'•• •,: r•i�v.•'3;. '. .;:•R�: >•as�-•,yi'.., .a• �. -fit ter.:• .�� 14 L�a r ter OO n d �..•-..r_.,K.,_�,.__-�-�.--'-,.y,,.. ..•, .. 't.": - °:; . ` o This 1e t - - . .- __�°.- � '•o._..:..�•:�_. . . + j . tier is o arithorize A be use of castiq' _sand'as generated- fray the Taylor & Fenn COM-:,nY, WIndsor, as daily ^cagier material at the East Hartford landfill. This meteri.al rAy not be used on .ar�r sid�.slo e it WiI1 b� subject to erosion _ _ . s where Our departrent has tlii determiner3 "tha `� waste, - s t sat,. iaF : not ► - -` w r.• t '" ` :'* s � a+ '' .. + • ... a -. a The Solid Waste Manager nt unit of the Ge ¢€�ti.,e ,a=, .- Protection has determined that-.this material- iS_suitable�for�use -as ndal ` rover. However, if a dust. Problem-is created by. this 'practice ly. .the sand _ ' casting as daily CG���i•m,� .. . , .._ • t use.Af - Lion with This approval is uased� n .a.�isua� ;�ri>p���.ar� byt�hisMUiiit 11 �ons�i�ta�'Solid taste Ka cement 0ni t�. and .,c a'--iicsl. analys.eS.-by the State of Connecticut Hea3th. C�-, rtment .and-i'mron.-�.nyiroizantal Services � 4 Should you have a r �..• : .r.. ,1 :p :• .. v .'.P �' l 'free .c�:ntac , Giroux at 566-4859. ues :' '�s �easar t' arr, t ,� 4�d ipn- e yiJ-..t'�•• },[>"li.,.;r' "'YJ .», y ,i • � ' aj e Y rBj�— r -Director e S111H:BL{3:et s # '� iC. 3"$ fiG-,.ant` V"3'lt s _ o cc: D. Albino Taylor Fenn n _ C. - Kurker - Solid �'astA . .. •:i�`Yi.t ; • � ;. ..,.. .. �A„ �'�' .tit•}" :. :J:,r. � ; ` `JjJ� •-JZ�:1s.r+e��T,t"'a��Y rJ- _,[S: ,,y+ )t»`+'J._ ..y� tJ. —j..•'�•• Rj - - •i- •'.. � '. t r �.+ ° =t;�.;'-•-,i•--�;-�..T -� '7.a�t. �1`•Y%'=�+�s-^�•�t��^•'�a_.,.�• ��5: t i, Y �' i � ..._,.} ;.••, - ?�,��-w. -1.�,'i.r rti'M'' ..t�^+ �`'�r sZ� r -x"''r'_ - ��r,�:.�i•y^t:jt��•� j. STATE OF CONNECTICUT � DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION February 27 , 1981 Constance Eriksson Inland Wetlands Agency ToTirn of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms . Eriksson: I am writing in response to your February 11, 1981, letter concerning a proposed casting sand disposal area in the Town of South Windsor. DEP Solid Waste staff are aware that such a facility has been proposed, We have reviewed chemical analyses and leachate tests performed on samples of the casting sand. However, at this time we have not received an application for the area and are not aware of its exact location in the Town. To date, Fuss and O'Neill Consulting Engineers have provided us with analyses of the Taylor and Fenn casting sand. Since only very small quantities of non-toxic metals readily leach from the sand, it has not been classified as a hazardous waste or as a solid waste. The Solid Waste Management Unit has determined that it should be considered a bulky waste from a permitting standpoint. The DEP intends to permit the pro-. posed disposal area as a bulky waste facility because the sand should not be disposed of indiscriminately. If not covered frequently, a dust problem might arise. If the site is not located properly, minor localized ground and surface water quality degradation could occur. Also, all casting sands are not the same in physical properties and chemical make-up. Some sands from certain foundries may pose a major threat to adjacent ground water quality. Through the guide- lines and regulations governing bulky waste disposal areas , we feel the environmental impacts from the disposal of the Taylor and Fenn casting sand can be contained on the property boundaries . Specifically, in response to your questions , our approval of the proposed disposal area will be based on assurances that no ground water contamination can occur to off-site wells . The material will have to be compacted and covered at least weekly or more frequently if necessary. Since the waste sand Phone: State Office Building, Hartford, Connecticut 06115 An Equal Opportunity Employer LETTER TO SOUTH WINDSOR PAGE TWO is non-putrescible, no odor problem should arise. Proper final site contours must prevent any silty runoff discharge to adjacent surface waters . Standard erosion control practices should suffice. Historically, hundreds of areas in the State have been filled with large quantities of casting sand and later built on. Our files do not show any instances of off-site water problems which can be traced back to one of these many, previously unregulated, casting sand fill deposits . Upon receipt of the application and site plans , the Commissioner will make a permitting decision on the site specifics of this facility. The bulky waste engineering guidelines and solid waste regulations are enclosed for your information. The engineering guidelines describe in detail the information which the applicant must provide. No public hearing is required during the permitting process . I hope that this letter answers your questions . Should you need further information, please contact Charles Atkins at 566-5847 . r� Very truly yours , Charles Kurker, P ,E, Director, Solid Waste Mgt , CK/dl Enclosure ' p Fir draws Flan for Sand Dungy SOUTH WINDSOR — A Windsor using sand, which when processed, Nearby residents of the proposed company has withdrawn its plan to contains traces of arsenic,copper,iron dump site have opposed the plan from dump sand with traces of chemicals at and magnesium. the start. A petition signed by 450 op- a site near the Podunk River. Last month the Inland Wetlands ponents was presented to the wetlands William Grace, attorney for Taylor Commission denied the company's ap- board before it denied the company's & Fenn Development Corp., notified plication, expressing fear that the request. the Planning and Zoning Commission chemicals would pollute groundwater Despite the withdrawal, the com- Tuesday that the company is with- and dust and the dump would cause pany can still reapply to the wetlands drawing its application to dump problems in the area. The denial was board. monthly 1,100 cubic yards of sand 11/4 issued without prejudice, meaning it acres just east of Rt. 5 near the tiver, could be resubmitted. In other business, the planning board Chairman Marshall Montana The company had asked for an ex- board Tuesday approved a 14-lot sub- said Tuesday at a board meeting. tension of the time needed to submit divisors on 15.7 acres on the corner of Grace gave no reason for the with- another application to the wetlands Griffin Road and Rye Street.The resi- drawaI,Montana said late Tuesday. board, and in late June, the planning dential subdivision is planned by Rich- The company makes iron castings -board approved the request. and Carabillo. aerll a. g Against elan To Dump Sand a rl � SOUTH.WINDSOR — kn attor , representing two owners of,proper- adjacent to the site of a propos , dump on the Podunk River Mond night reiterated his clients' fears th trace chemicals in the dump wo pose a health problem. Taylor & Fenn Development Corp of Windsor plans to dump 11 cub" yards of sand a month on 1 1/4 acre near the river and just east of Rt. 5 The sand, which is used in processin` iron casting, contains traces of ars.° nic, copper, thenol,,iron and magn sium. Dr. H. Robert Silverstein of Ha ford Hospital told the Inland Wetlan Commission the materials are ones would not want in my own baci yard: Jeffrey Heidtman, hydrologist f. Fuss and O'Neill, a.consultant to-Ta -tor&Fenn,said the traces are far low standards considered safe I drinking water.Silverstein counter that: the effects of chemicals on in viduals varies and cannot be predi `y ed. .z Harry H.Kleinman,the attorney f the adjacent property owners,said.. fears the effect continuous dumping these chemicals will have over th years. A petition signed by50 residentsa' posing the application was added the list.of 400 residents who had ' ready signed a petition last mont Monday's meeting was intended to a low commission members to disc ' the application, however, the meeti was open to public comment. Wiliam Grace, attorney for Tayl;. &Fenn, presented photographs off garbage-strewn site as it is now in effort to show that:the site would improved if their plans were a y proved. Constance Eriksson, who heads t commission,said that if the aplicatiQ is approved a substantial performan bond should be required, sand shout be covered daily to prevent dust pro lems,, and the area should be mo tored. . - The corporation has applied to t. state.Department of Environmen Protection to dump there. A staff - port from the DEP concluded the said was safe to use as fill. However, department has not yet given final a; provai to the application. `1 THE HARTFORD COURANT: TueWay,�June 9, 1981 63 Wetlands Panel Kills Bled To Dump Sand gar Po' dunk River SOUTH WINDSOR -- Citing puss- Dust that may result from the ble pollution problems and opposition dumping can be dangerous to persons from area residents,.the Inland Wet- with allergies, Lane said,:adding he lands Commission Monday night voted worries -about-who:will monitor the 6-1 to deny without prejudice Taylor site. He also disputed the company's and Fenn's much-debated proposal to statement that the fill would clean an dump sand with traces of chemicals at area now used for illegal dumping.The a.site near the Podunk River. town can force the owners to clean up Taylor and'Fenn Development Corp. the site so such a statement should not of Windsor wanted to dump 1,100 cubic be be a bargaining point for approval, yards of sand a month on 1 1/a aeres he said. near the river,just east of Rt.5. The •Commission member Jeremiah sand, which is used in processing iron O'Sullivan said he does not believe the castings, contains traces of arsenic, application's problems are insur- copper,thenol,iron and magnesium. mountable, but said it is the.appli- Because the application was denied cant's responsibility to be sure the ap- without prejudice, the applicant may -plication covers all potential reapply if the application is changed. problems. substantially. Chairwoman.Constance Eriksson, Neighbors opposed the. application the only member voting against the from the start although the state De- denial,said she feels the potential pol- partment of Environmental, Protec- lotion problem was exaggerated. tion has said the chemical content is "Some words used threw people into a $QG far less than the minimum considered fit,"she said. - safe for drinking water.Residents say A petition signed by approximately Ae they fear the cumulative effect the 450 residents was offered before the chemicals would have on the river and vote to deny the application was taken. drinking water: "We simply don't know how it (the Scholarships -groundwater) will move under- ground," commission member Calvin ESSEX -- Essex Rotary Club Y Lane said in making the motion to scholarships have been awarded to deny the application. "I believe grant John Grillo,who will be given$2,000 $little ing it would be contrary to the best and Richard Adams who will be giv- awl- interest of South Windsor,"he said. en$500: as AST HARTFORD NOTES m ment for 13 years. Thy -ware •ppresented by the "MCA will PTO. �:e� 1981 Town of South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency Town Hall South Windsor, Connecticut The undersigned residents , tax payers and owners of property in South Windsor object to the application of The Taylor and Fenn Development Corp. for permission to land fill property West of Route 5 and Northeast of Chapel Road for the following reasons: 1. The fill to be dumped at the above location contains arsenic and other possible toxic waste . 2 . The presence of such waste material will be dangerous to the health and safety of the residents of South Windsor for the following reasons: (a) It will flow in by underground streams or other- wise into wells and sources of water supplies and pollute the same with damage to those drinking water or using water for business purposes. (b) It will contaminate flowing rivers including the Podunk River and the Connecticut River and have adverse affect upon fisheries. (c) There is a high water table in the area of the land fill which would make it easy for the above toxic waste to affect water. supplies . (d) All evidence indicates that the water sources in the northeast part of the United States are diminishing and water should remain as pure as possible without outside adverse effects upon i t. (e) There may be aquifers in the general area of this dump which in the future might be used as water sources and , there- fore, would be adversely affected by the presence of this toxic material . For the above reasons we urge very strongly, for health, for safety and for the future needs of our Town and its residents that this application be denied . Name Address �. 34 1981 Town of South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency Town .Hall South Windsor, Connecticut The undersigned residents, tax payers and owners of property in South Windsor object to- the application of The Taylor and Fenn Development Corp. for permission to land fill property West of Route 5 and Northeast of Chapel Road for the following reasons: 1. The- fill to be dumped at the above location contains arsenic and. other possible toxic waste. 2. The presence of such waste material will be dangerous to the health and safety of the residents of South Windsor for the following; reasons: (a) It will flow in by underground streams or other- wise into wells and sources of water supplies and pollute the same with damage to those drinking water or using water for business purposes. (b) '' It will contaminate flowing rivers including the Podunk River and the Connecticut River and have adverse affect upon fisheries. (c) There is a high water table in the area of the land fill which would make it easy for the above toxic waste to affect water supplies. (d) All evidence indicates that the water sources in the northeast part of the United States are diminishing and water should remain as pure as possible without outside adverse effects upon it. (e) There may be aquifers in the general area of this dump which in the future might be used as water sources and, there- fore, would be adversely affected by the presence of this toxic material. For the above reasons we urge very strongly, for health, for safety and for the future needs of our Town and its residents that this application be denied. Name Address ►n_st, --- - �� � YY1a,t4l S-�f , so W . A/I �v 's�; s ----------------------------------- AAA C ` L. Sciialz., Director - - - -- _ - — --- Em7iro-,ment a i To G^C v10 1 3i./J ^ U ^T0:_i DU__ I _G-0_ ST iTTE P .0? i�!'_r — l_'��,J�, C'�_:-' ------ - — --- �. ����l ry 7 1.� ...�.• .7 _^1C r,9v. n TT- r, i•r'i }'� l `,l'1 7 ..'e rls '7 d(11 (1=.a _ na�/ ZC ILJ V-J'...1. ll Jli�1� T'"1i�..1:.1VI 1._. .1.Z...vCr ._C- J C.C. -f, u��d GJ 1.1..1JT'i.._� -. `�';!C lcnd, loCat.3d lU:,t .^nor-th o1 ti'e i1i s::;ell �riC:-•' off F�'�St i J^?' J`I.CUt r,i r , )_ t'J he ne `'�v e o.rle-I by D�?j arl:s 'e .1 tCl u_1-o" " -C--S �,- C t C�:L.. Ct1CUU r1 t r, 1C a'_1u t.eCrCe3ti0:1• 1� U_OC T:ir �+, �l c:n ^-J or and Fe;-. ,, io. as T' - ZJ C�uy nl.r-:r inc UJv..1 L-- 1' --�J_ C+1 u dla. p'?1ri r�rO-LL''d for C3St1=i_ sand; 1t has Coco- an open di: .-o by un3 addition or rciuse '•l,cr than t n Sand. �,!e q._r'e revues-gi nr r;a ' ', rer U�__:, .,_ �.)1 CaS�_ �; ._ _� 't� � 't..1.S proJ.._L'% G3 Clea1?e i lip and p7Ste .'ccasS • ne area a -ii to 1 rev t " rino�• to c_. zr ;..�s b� >_i to prevent lu_ �__ abuse . !'"r. Duane of ttilss office S.^.ot:ld be Co-bade recta-dinr- any questions you may hav on -this :~.after. - -You-1- attention to t_Zi s problem is appreciated. ` RoCert -j. Sc LLLz Pi's:1A I SAVZ t'j sn::rr ou 5�:.' ;:!,.A r5n.a. gg} � �J7li• •UIL \• 1 / It .Lltir .� ('('Y.1' ('n7'.•7,5 . Fi/rJLf/.'(.JY n.rA.:n l.5 . /7/t fL�,i/I(Jif.Y/5'7/f S/.flf . CY7(/,YI'/( ,1/.l'.-0r;l!!(art//.Y/,f't.:; october 25, 1912 lir. Frederick Bishop Taylor & Fenn Company 22 Deerfield Road Windsor, Connecticut 05097 Dear Mr. Bishop : This letter is confirmation of our discussion on Friday , October 20, 1972, regarding the dump site on State property South of East Barber Street- - All junk motor vehicles and appliances are to be removed from the site. The remaining refuse is to be compacted and covered with at least two (2) feet of clean fill . • Following this , you, with D.O.T. cooperation in posting, and blocking .the area, will ba responsible for maintaining the area in the required con- dition. your prompt and effective cooperation will be greatly appreciated.. i Very truly yours , Byron L. Tart, Jr. Environmental Health Officer • I BLT:cc cc: -Mr. Michael Riley Department of Transportation Mr. Joseph W. Voboril , Director Planned Aquisition Unit, Dept. of Environmental Protection 0 r 1 ell) n ; v t. STATE OF CON �' ECTICUT DE:PA TMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OFFICE BUILDING HARTFORD, GONNECTICUT OG115 P.O. Box 161 Pleasant Valley, CT. 06063 E'arch 19,- 1975 The Taylor and Fenn Company 22 Deerfield Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Attention: 1•1r. Arthur A. Avedisian Dear Sir: For a number of years Taylor and Fenn has been depositing casting waste _material on State-oi•med property at Windsor ileadoi•:s. I can find no re- cord of any formal agreenent whereby this is a legal action. The Tot•In of .,Tindsor through their Sanitarian, Hr. FAwR-rd 11all, has ex- pressed concern that this area is harboring rodents and has baited the area on several occasions. Your dumping of flood materials and cardboard cartons has given this area the appearance of a refuse disposal site and has encouraged others to illegally dump refuse there. dindsor Meadows has become unsightly due to this combination of casting waste and refuse, therefore I request that you discontinue the deposition of waste materials on this State-owned property. If you would like to discuss this matter further I can be reached at 379-0771. Sincerely yours, Anthony'�4. Cantele Regional Director T¢ /z%� cc eaX/c/ 6 /& J U�nS on 3 Bampton -t ?f f Z� / 1 . 1.1iller ,SGf cf mea/�rr� wi JO h�su•, vt IMr l/ Voboril I / Bi. Wallo.T,�, (W jj/l 7ID i/06'4a-4+'`4 v;y9-�s3/ V U LI�1�A i I�li� � : O Fiji V .'�0 �i��ENTAL �L1 i S�,i ILJIV � .STATE OFFICE BUILDING iIARTi'GeZD, GONNECTICUt 06115 P. 0. Box 161 ?leasant Valley, Connecticut 06063 April U.. 1915 The Taylor & Fenn Company 22 Deerfield Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Attention: Mir. Johnson Dear Sir; As I stated at our meeting of 4/04/75 our goal is to ,discontinue your dumping of inert casting materials at 'vindsor Meadows-Recreation Area within six months. You have indicates mt--Taylor& Fenn will earnestly pursue an investigation to locate another dumping site within that six month period. lie fully realize that it may be difficult for you to .find another deposit site and I do not intend to be unreasonable in ryranting you adequate time to locate a site. Our accepting your waste material on State land, however, is of no benefit to this Department and creates an unsightly condition at Windsor Meadows for which we have been cri- ticized. During the interim period this Department will require that you cover the existing material and all future dumping with a material capable of supporting the growth of grass and that a good cover of grass be established thereon. Continued dumping should be only off the northeastern face of the present bank and at a lower elevation than the present dumping. I will contact you prior to the six month deadline to determine ifl you have made progress in locating a new deposition site. Sincerely yours, Anthony J. Cmtele Regional Director cc Bamoton :Tiller West Mr. Mall Voboril SLI(IGES'l iWi �:o"mi-I-TEE Si,'(- I rjvr vat,r O vn Co jition; Emil Cash oral Recognition: Send 1 1 a Suygc%tion! I'nfe rd- eparf me nf Me s sar-,e .),\VE TINIC J-1-PI-1111C. arijon if S-!u rea.11) n-da Theodore B. B�uTiptcn Deputy Commissi.ener 2/9/76 TO ConServation A Presprvation N A kri F Anthony J. Pantel.e Director 379-0771 From Region I Re: Damping - Windsor Meadows I became awire of a di:mvinc, problem nf. Windsor Meadow- in November of 1974. At this time Mr. Charles .9nnitarian for the Town of Windsor, was conce-ned that thi.s arp.;; was becoming a nliblic diimp and was -Ittrsof.i.n� r,qt.9 to the neighboring homes. Uron investigation T found the-ty indeed, there wnq -- nroblem with the public Humnini- housphnld trash, rpfriger-?tors, etc. on the nronprtv. It was apparent that the past nrqctice of allowing :1 local r!'1 S ti n P, company, Taylor & Fenn to dump inert casting sand at Windsor MesdoTtys was the underlying problem. The casting sand made the area look like a dump so people 1'dumrPd" there. I checked out any le'f7al hasis for the Taylor &- FPnn (.o. dumping and Vohoril could find no Ippse or Parp-ment of anv kind. Pill Miller says Taylor & Fenn dumped there when Chri4tt-nsen o,,med the property and Burak(?) reinforced it when the State purchrisexi the- land. I then sent Taylor & Fenn a letter dated 3/19/75 stating the problem and requesting that they discontinue dumping. I immediately received a call from Mr. Johnson of Taylor Pr Fenn requesting that we talk over the problem. I arranged a mpptinc- between the Tol'.rn of Windsor Sanita- rian, myself, and Mr. Johnson. The meeting was held on h/h/75• fit that time I stated our goal. was to discontinue diimnintg at Windsor Meadows but we would give them six months to find an alternate location. During the six month period I restricted the area of deposit and required they cover the Pxisti-nLz 3?nci with material. capable of supporting the growth of vegetation and they establish a grass cover. Immediately thereafter we secured the dumping area thru the use of .a. heavy gate and an earthen barrier. These measures effectively prevented further public dumping at the site. Taylor & Fenn was provided a key to the gate and continilpd to dump inert sand. SAVE TIME 11 cont-enient, handt4yrte reply to icn.1cf a-; this same sheet. STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OFFICE BUILDING HARTFORD, CONNEcnCUT 06115 February 25, 1976 The Taylor & Fenn Company 22 Deerfield Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Attention: Mr. J. Herman Johnson Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to put the Taylor & Fenn Company on notice that effective March 5, 1976 no dumping of any kind, including metal casting material and sand, will be permitted on State land in the Windsor Meadows area under administrative control of the Department of Environmental Protection. The area which you are presently using on the south side of East Barber Street will be posted and the gate locked. The driver of any vehicle that enters and violates this order will be arrested. This letter terminates any previous arrangement or agreement which the Taylor & Fenn Company had or may have had concerning permission to dump on State land. Enclosed you will find a copy of the map showing our State holdings in the Windsor Meadows area. Si'ncere},y, Theodore B. Bampton Deputy Commissioner TBB/c Enclosure cc: Town of Windsor - Town Manager Health Department ✓ CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Telephone: 566-4419 ►� ,2J , t� a M 3�22� STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: South Windsor, Review of Plans and Application for a Proposed Bulky Waste (Casting Sand) Disposal Area, April 16 , 1981. TO: Charles L. Atkins , Principal Sanitary Engineer FROM: John England, * Senior Environmental Analyst On April 14, 1981, the Solid Waste Management Unit of DEP received plan: and an application dated March 1981 for a new bulky waste disposal area. The site is to be owned and operated by Taylor and Fenn Development Corporation. The only material to be disposed of will be casting sand from the Taylor and Fenn 4inOsor plant . Based on laboratory analyses of sand samples by DEP and a private laboratory, the casting sand has been classified as a bulky waste. Disposal operations will take place in a 15-acre pit previously excavated for clay used in brick making. The 15 acres is part of a total 27-acre parcel located in South Windsor, 300 feet east of Route 5 , 800 feet north of Chapel Road, and 400 feet south of the Podunk River. Access to the area for the 1-3 truckloads per day cf sand is available from the north or south sides of the site. All drainage, both ground and surface water, eventually discharges to the northwest into the Podunk River. Any future leachate discharge zones will be located on the property or the adjacent flood plain to be donated to the Town, The site engineering plans , prepared for the applicant by Fuss and O'Neill Consulting Engineers , describe all aspects of the site drainage, soils , filling sequence, access , and closure provisions . The plans and application are complete in accor- dance with DEP Solid Waste Regulations and the Engineering Guidelines for Bulky Waste Disposal Areas . In view of the underlying clay soils, innocuous nature of the casting sand, and the existing adjacent industrial development , no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from the proposed bulky waste fill. Issuance of a permit is recommended subject to the following additional conditions not fully described in the application: a. No schedule for closure of the illegal on-site bulky waste area is given. Solid Waste staff suggest the closure be completed within one year of the issuance of the bulky waste permit. b. The casting sand should be graded and covered at least weekly. Should dust problems arise, daily cover may be required. REPORT RE: TAYLOR & FENN PAGE TWO c. All existing analyses indicate that the casting sand Dre- sently being produced is an inert, harmless substance. Taylor and Fenn should be required to notify the DEP Solid Waste Management Unit if their manufacturing process should change and result in a change in the chemical content of the waste sand. In addition, Taylor and Fenn should have a representative sample of their sand analyzed annually for the critical parameters shown on page V-4 of the engineering report. A copy of this analysis should be sent to DEP. These permit provisions and utilization of the engineering site plans should ensure that an environmentally acceptable disposal process results . JE/dl 4/16/81 �r _ '_ • i Y,K, ♦ } ♦♦ Y `q s / i ♦� fix.' + ( , ' ' 9 } v w d ,..-ram► .00 ...� klk P S % WR a �r� t 40 Adr- xy� �'*F l a r lr°' +'it•l,,4,., � ,�,,,,, �,,, � ..ram 4ok y • low * SOWAIP � ~ .� + ♦ r .•- SAO dmL— 1 1 1 ' PROPOSED CASTING ,SAND DISPOSAL AREA TAYLOR & FENN DEVELOPMENT CORP. SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 1 1 MARCH, 1981 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 FUSS & O'NEILLL, INC. 210 MAIN STREET MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ' APPLICATION PERMIT 19-524b(c) ' CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION I-1 CHAPTER II GEOLOGY II-1 ' A. Regional Geology II-1 ' B. Site Exploratory Method II-3 C. Site Geology II-5 ' 1 . Bedrock II-5 2. Till II-6 3. Glacial Lake Deposits II-7 4. Overlying Deposits II-7 ' CHAPTER III HYDROGEOLOGY III-1 CHAPTER IV PROPOSED LANDFILL FOR CASTING SAND IV-1 ' 1 . Waste Sources and Quantities IV-1 2 . Sequence of Filling IV-1 ' 3. Landfilling Methods IV-2 4. Cover Material IV-2 5. Site Preparation IV-3 ' 6. Hours of Operation and Equipment IV-4 7. Future Landuse IV-4 8. Landform Discussion IV-5 ' 9. Buffer Zone IV-6 CHAPTER V ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT V-1 ' A. Groundwater Impact V-1 B. Seepage Control V-5 TAB LES ' III-1 Groundwater Levels, Proposed Casting Sand Disposal Area Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. , South Windsor, Conn. III-2 ' V-1 Water Quality Evaluation V-4 i ' TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont) PLATES No. 1 Area Map/Water Table Map Found at end of report No. 2 Proposed Casting Sand Landfilling Found at end of report ' No. 3 Cross-Sections Found at end .of report APPENDICES A Boring Logs Found at end of report ' B Geologic Profiles Found at end of report C Casting Sand Leachate Tests Found at end of report D Bibliography Found at end of report ii J ' O FUSS&O'NEILL consulting engineers March 26, 1981 Mr. Charles Kurker, Director ' Office of Solid Waste Management Connecticut Dept. of Environmental Protection 122 Washington Street ' Hartford, CT 06114 RE: Proposed Casting Sand Disposal Area ' Taylor & Fenn Development Corporation ' Dear Mr. Kurker: In accordance with our previous correspondence relating to the above matter, ' we have prepared this disposal area evaluation for casting sand generated by the Taylor & Fenn Corporation of Windsor, Connecticut. The landfill de- sign and level of investigation are at a minimum commensurate with the guidelines and regulations for bulky waste materials. Taylor & Fenn Corpora- tion is concurrently pursuing the appropriate local permits for this proposed disposal area. ' We look forward to working with you on this most important matter. ' Very truly yours, Walter S. Fuss, P.E. P. Heidtman ' WS F/J PH/j lz Enclosures 210 MAIN STREET / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TELEPHONE (203)646-2469 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY STATE OF CONN-ECTICUT ' DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OFFICE BUILDING HARTFORD,CONNECTICUT 06115 APPLICATION FOR PERCT(S) FOR OONSIRUCTING AND OPERATION OF A SOLID WASTE ' FACU= MER SECTION 19-524b(c) OF THE COAL STATUTES . Date March 30, 1981 STATE OF ODNNECIICLTr Department of Evniror mental Protection Solid Waste Management Program State Office Building Hartford, Connecticut 06115 To The Colmlissioner of Environmental Protection: The Taylor & Fenn Development Corp South Windsor Name ot Operator Owner City Town ' State of Connecticut herewith make application to the Ccamissioner for permit(s) to construct and operate a solid waste facility. In support of the application of the following information is submitted: ' SECTION I 1. This application pertains to a (check the appropriate facility, if other, explain): ' Section A: Private Solid Waste Disposal Area ' Private Regional Solid Waste Disposal Area Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Area (serves one municipality) Municipal Regional Solid Waste Disposal Area (serves two or;more) mmicipalities) Other Section B: Private Bulky. Waste Disposal Area Private Regional Bulky Waste Disposal Area ' Ijzdcipal Bulky Waste Disposal Area (serves one mmicipality) Municipal Regional Bulky Waste Disposal Area (serves two or mores) ( municipalities) X Other Private Casting Sand Disposal Area APPLICATION ' PAGE TW Section C: ' Regional Transfer Stateion serves two or more municipalities) �- C P ) Municipal Transfer Station (serves one municipality) ' Private Transfer Station (serves one or more municipalities) Section D: ' Regional Resource Recovery Plant (serves two or more municipalities) Ynicipal Resource Recovery Plant (serves one municipality) ' Private Resource Recovery Plant (serves one or more municipality) Section E: ' Other (Be specific, e.g. shredder, incinerator, baler, etc.) 2. These questions apply if your facility falls into Sections A or B above. ' A. If you are applying fora Solid Waste Disposal Area Permit, this application is for (check one) ' X A new site (no previous permit); a vertical expansion of an existing site; a horizontal expansion of an existing site. B. If this application is for expansion of an existing facility, what additional acreage and/or volume is being applied for? ' acreage or cubic yds. C. Does the existing facility have a valid Solid Waste Permit? 1 yes/no - 3. A. If you are applying for a Volume Reduction Plant or Transfer Station Permit, will this be a new or modified facility? (circle one) B. If you are modi.fjing an existing facility, does this facility have a valid Solid Waste Permit? yes no If yes, give Permit No. and date of issuance 4. Location of facility: Attach a survey and map certifying the location of the property on which this facility is or will be located (certified Deed Survey is adequate); ' S. Attach a list of materials being submitted in support of this application in accordance with applicable guidelines, (e,g. maps, plans, diagrams, operational plans and details, specifications, operational and mainten- ance mmi ua.Is, etc.) Note: Three copies of all supportive material are required to°coQplete an application package, Report entitled "Proposed Casting Sand Disposal Area for Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc." 1 APPLICATION 1 PAGE TIM 1 6. Supportive materials were prepared by Fuss & O'Neitl Inc. Name of Professional Engineer registered of 210 Main Street Manchester Connecticut 1 in Connecticut 'Address 7. Prime contact for engineer/applicant. (Name and pbone nudxx) 1 _ Jeffrey P. Heidtman - # 646-2469 - • 8. A. Does this facility require any additional DEP Approvals or Permits? 1 No - yes/no B. If yes, attach an explanation of the nature and present status of all other required DEP permits. 1 9. If this project involves a designated wetland, have all applicable wetland permits been obtained? ' No 1 - . yes/no 10. If water quality monitoring points (ground and surface) exist at this site, does this application include all data collected to date at these 1 points? Yes yes no 1 11. Ibes_. this facility comply with the State Solid Waste Management Plan? Yes yes/no 1 SECTION II (Attach extra sheets when necessary) 1 - If owner is mmicipality, go directly to Section III - 1 1. Are you prepared to post a performance bond or other security sufficient to assure compliance with any permits, certificates, or approvals granted to you through this application? Yes 1 yes no 2. A. Are you as the applicant for this facility, an individual, 1 partner, x corporation, other? (Chec cone) B. If you are an individual, give your full name and address. 1 1 C. (1) If area partnership, give the names and addresses of you partn h�.p, all partners. (Attach separate sbeet if necessary) . 1 1 ' APPLICATION PAGE FOUR ' (2) If you are a limited partnership under Section 34-9, et s Connecticut General Statutes, give the names and addresses of all general partners: (Attach separate sheet if necessary) (3) Have any of the partners (general partners in the case of a limited partnership) ever filed for voluntary bankruptcy? .If-yes_ , attach an explanation as to who f�i.led _ahe r,iihere, why. yes m (4) Do any of the partners (general partners in the case of a limited partnership) have a present intention to file for voluntary barkruptcy? If yes, attach an explanation as yes/no . . to who will-;-file and wiry. (5) Have any of the partners (general partners in the case of a limited partnership) ever been placed in receivership?_- ' yes/no If yes, attach an explanation of who was so placed, by wham, when, where,--and why, (6) Have involuntary bankruptcy proceedings ever been instituted against the partnership (limited partnership) or any of its partners (general partners)? - If yes, attach an explanation yes/no ' of wino instituted the proceeding, against whom, where, when, why. ' D. If you are a corporation, give: ( ); The full name of the corporation, Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. ' (2) The State in which you are incorporated. Connecticut ( ) The address of your principal place of busisiess. ' 22 Deerfield Road Windsor, Connecticut (4) If you are not Incorporated in the State of Comnecticut, are 1 ' you registered as a foreign corporation with the Office of the Secretary of State? _ yes n (5) The name and address of your Agent for Service of Process, Attorney William Grace ' 25 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 ' APPLICATION PAGE FIVE (6) The names and addresses of corporate officers, See attached sheet t (7) The names and addresses of all principal shareholders ' (those holding 107. or more of the total capital stock issued and outstanding as a percent of per value). Taylor & Fenn Co.; 100% stockholder i - (8) Has the corporation of have any of its officers or principal shareholders ever filed for voluntary bankruptcy? ' No If so, attach an explanation as to who filed, where, yes/no when, and why, ' (9) Does the corporation or do any of its ofificers or princi- pal shareholders have a present intention to file for voluntary bankruptcy? No If so, attach an explan- yes/no ation as to who will file and why, ' k10) Has the corporation or have any of its officers or principal shareholders fiver been placed in receivership?. No If so, attach an explanation of who was so placed, by wbcm, when, where, why. (11)Have involuntary bankruptcy proceedings ever been in- stituted against the corporation or any of its officers or principal shareholders? No If so, attach an yes no ' explanation of who instituted the proceeding, against mom, where, when, why. 1 ' (6) The names and addresses of corporate officers. Chairman of the Board ' Edgar B. Butler, Jr. 95 Sunset Farm Road West Hartford, CT 06107 ' President James E. Shea ' 7 Terrace Lane West Hartford, CT 06107 ' Vice President John V. Albano 183 Kensington Avenue ' Meriden, CT 06450 ' Secretary-Treasurer Ernest O. Tuthill 131 St. James Street West Hartford, CT 06119 APPLICATION ' PAGE SIX ' E. If you are other than an individual., corporation, or partnership, attach a detailed explanation of your identity as an applicant for this facility. ' SECTION III NOM: This section should be ccapleted by the owner of the facility ' being appliedfor. ' 1. A. What is the nature of your ownership interest in the facility and the land upon which the facility will be located? ((heck one)_ Deed, Lease, X Other ' (1) If deed, attach a copy of said deed. (a) Is this deed recorded?- (yes or no) , (b) If so, where?(include v—oEu e, page) ' (c) Attach the names and address of any person or persons having or claiming any interest in said land or facility other than ' those specified in said deed. Include an explanation of the nature of such interests or claims e.g. mortgage, lien, lease, contract, option, right of way, easement, etc, and attach a copy of all relevant docents setting forth such interests. (2) If lease, attach a copy of said lease (If the lease is oral, set forth its essential terms including the name and address of lessor). ' (a) If the lease is written, does said attached lease represent the entire agreement as between the parties to said lease? (yes or no) (b) Is this lease recorded? (yes or no) (c) If so, where? (Include vo^lum, page) (d) If the lease does not contain warranties or other representations of ownership by the lessor, attach a copy of the document by which the lessor asserts the right to lease said land (facility) to you. . (3) If ownership interest is asserted by virtue of something other than a deed or lease, please explain (attach copies of relevant documents). Purchase agreement, purchase pending B. 1. Who will operate this facility?(Give name and address of certified ' operator) Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. ' APPLICATION PAGE SEVEN 2. What is the nature of your business relationship to the operator (if the operator is to be someone other than yourself) e.g. employee, independent contractor, joint venturer, partner, etc. Attach copies of any written agreements and other relevant documents ' establishing your business relationship with the operator. _ If no such written documentation exists, set forth the essential terms of any oral agreements made which evidence the establishment of your business relationship with the operator. ' SECTION IV NOTE: This section should be completed by the operator of the facility ' being applied for, 1. Who is the owner of the subject land (facility)? ' Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. 2. Have you examined this application of Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. (Owner s name ' dated March 303, 1981as on file? Yes (yes; or no) 3. Are you in complete agreement with the representations made in and application as to the nature of your business relationship as operator ' for said owner? Yes (yes or no) If not, attach an explanation indicating in ublTi respect you disagree and state your reasons. 4. Attach copies of any written agreements between you and any person other than the owner relating to the operator or proposed operation of said facility. %-If no such written agreements exist, state terms of ' any oral agreements between you and such other person relating to the operator of said facility, SECTION V NOTE: Both the owner and operator of this facility must sign this section. 1 I certify that I have examined the above information and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true and complete, (Signature subjects ' the owner and operator to provisions of the General Statutes regarding false and misleading statements), /41 flzedl Signature o Edgar B. Butler Ad J. ' Signature or uperpror 11/79 Edgar B. Butler ' CHAPTER I ' INTRODUCTION The Taylor & Fenn Company, located in Windsor, Connecticut immediately north of the Bissell Bridge, is a foundry operation producing ferrous ' castings. As part of the operation, molds comprised of a fine sand are util- ized to form the casting. Resins are used in this process to prevent the mold from adhering to the casting. The sand is wasted in the casting process. ' About 1100 c.y. of waste casting per month is produced. ' Historically, the casting sand had been landfilled on a 3.2 acre parcel immediately south of the Bissell Bridge in Windsor. It is estimated that up to 50,000 c.y. of material has been deposited on that site. Following ' disposal at that site, the sand was used for cover material at the Windsor- Bloomfield Landfill. It is presently used for cover material at the East Hartford landfill. Such use has been approved by the Connecticut Depart- ment of Environmental Protection. The casting sand is an adequate cover soul except that under continuous tracking with heavy equipment it can be- come a dust source. As a consequence, Taylor & Fenn is not assured that a long term use of this material at a landfill is feasible. Therefore, in ' order to provide a positive disposal outlet, the decision was made to pursue a disposal area for these waste products which would be owned and operated ' by Taylor & Fenn. 'In 1979, Fuss & O'Neill was approached to evaluate a 100 acre parcel in ' South Windsor for the above purpose. Based on our preliminary investigation, FUSS&O'NEILL I-1 it was determined this parcel was really not suitable for the intended use. ' Subsequent to that specific site evaluation, Fuss & O'Neill was asked to sur- vey potentially suitable sites in South Windsor in an attempt to locate a ' suitable site. As criteria in that search process, a number of considerations ' were applied. These are briefly as follows: ' 1 . The site must be industrially zoned and removed from dense residential areas. ' 2. The geology of the site should preclude contamination of groundwater. ' 3. The site should be located within the watershed :of a B quality stream. 4. No regulated wetlands should be filled. 5. Access to the site should be from either a State highway or an indistrial ' Town Road. 6. Site should be large enough to accommodate at least. 10 years of casting ' sand generation. ' From this process the proposed site between Chapel Road and Pleasant ' Valley Road in South Windsor was identified. The parcel, as shown on Plate No. 1 , is a 27 acre parcel selected from ' a larger parcel to include level land along the western 1/3 of the site and the large former clay pit in the central and eastern portions of the site. The parcel abuts the Podunk River along its northwest boundary. The land ' surrounding the parcel to the north and east consists of undeveloped indus- trial land with ruins of past brick-making activities and isolated clay pit ' FUSS&O'NEILL I-2 i excavations. To the south and southwest, the parcel abuts a number of small commercial buildings and a construction company. Access to these establishments is via a gravel access road from Route 5 with an at-grade ' crossing of the railroad. ' Access to the disposal area parcel will be via a right-of-way south from Pleasant Valley Road. That access will pass commercial development in that area. A portion of the site has been utilized in the past as a dumping area for ibulky wastes, metals and road demolition. This bulky waste area will be closed as part of the Taylor & Fenn operation and not utilized for waste disposal. The site requires the approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency, the Planning ' & Zoning Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) at the local ilevel. To date, the approval from the ZBA has been received. Applications are pending before both the Inland Wetlands Agency and the Planning and Zoning Commission. A public hearing for the latter two has been scheduled For April 1981 . 1 i iThe filling approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission is a one (1) year approval Annual renewals are required and are granted based on j the previous years performance. I-3 FUSS&O'NEILL 1 ' CHAPTER II 1 GEOLOGY A. Regional Geology The proposed casting sand disposal area is located in a major geo- graphic feature known as the Connecticut River Valley. This valley 1 is formed by the underlying bedrock. In this area the bedrock is comprised of a red shale of Triassic Age. These rocks were formed ' between 225 and 180 million years ago from eroded material derived ' from an uplifted area to the east. Unlike most sedimentary rocks, these materials accumulated on land in a relatively dry environment. 1 For this reason, the mineral grains which comprise the rock have 1 become stained with various metal oxides by repeated wetting and drying from precipitation and periodic inundation, giving these rocks their 1 characteristic red color. At the time of deposition, these rocks were 1 dipping westerly away from the source of the material from which they are comprised. Continued faulting along the eastern margin of the valley has caused the rotation of the beds such that today they dip to the east. 1 Periodically, during the Triassic period, molten lava flowed from the 1 faults along the eastern margin of the valley and covered the accumulated sedimentary materials in the valley. These lava flows were later buried ' by the continued erosion and deposition of the highland material from the 1 east. Today these flows exist as distinct layers of "basalt" in the 1 stratigraphic section of sedimentary rocks. - 1 II-1 FUSS&O'NEILL Since the end of the Triassic period, approximately 180 million years ago, the New England area has remained relatively stable being sub- jected to only slow uplift. During this period, the major topographic J Y P 9 P , J ' features, like the dissected highlands occupying eastern and western ' Connecticut and the Connecticut River Valley, developed through the forces of erosion. These features, though still evident today, have been modified or ' partially buried by at least two episodes of continental glaciation. The advancing glacial ice caused the deposition of a compact, poorly sorted material immediately overlying the bedrock surface--called glacial till. The till is derived from the ice erosion of the underlying bed- rock as well as preglacial soils which have been redistributed as a re- sult of glacial ice. In the Connecticut River Valley the underlying Triassic rock was not very resistant to erosion by glacial ice. This is evidenced by the local scouring and over-deepening of the preglacial channel of the Connecticut River to depths below current sea level and below the inferred sea level of that time. At the end of glaciation, ice disappeared from the Connecticut Valley ' area primarily by downward melting. Melt waters flowed over the ' residual valley ice and along the drainage channel created by the bed- rock valley wall to the east and the residual valley ice. This flow ' resulted in the deposition of glaciofluvial (ice contact) deposits at II-2 FUSS&O'NEILL ' various levels along the eastern valley wall. An extension of these ' deposits filled the Connecticut River Valley below what is now Rocky Hill and formed a dam to the glacial melt waters. As melting continued the area behind the above dam filled with water, ' creating a glacial lake that extended over the Connecticut River Valley ' in north central Connecticut. ' This lake was in existence for several thousand years and, as a result, thick sequences of various unconsolidated materials accumulated in it. ' These materials consist of layered sand, silt and gravel deposits along ' the shallow lake edges resulting from influent streams and beach develop- ment and varved silts and clays in the deeper more quiescent portion ' of the lake. Near the end of the lake history, stream deposition en- croached over the lake clay deposits capping them with stratified sands. Sediment accumulations of in excess of 300 feet have been noted locally for this lake. ' After the draining of the lake, now called Lake Hitchock, the Connecticut ' River reestablished itself and began to erode the lake sediments. The river has significantly cut into these materials and has created a flood- plain through lateral erosion by meandering. ' B. Site Exploratory Method In early February, in-office research was conducted utilizing existing geologic and hydrogeologic information relating to the proposed site. ' FUSS&O'NEILL I I-3 ' Existing well boring logs were examined, as well as pertinent regional ' information collected by the U.S. Geological Survey which includes depth to bedrock, bedrock contours, thickness of clay, thickness of ' material overlying the clay, availability of groundwater and inland wet- lands and watercourses. ' With the aid of the aforementioned existing regional information, a soil boring and monitor well program was developed for the property in ' order to assess and monitor any_ environmental changes which might be ' induced by tandfilling with casting sand. Drilling and installation of monitor wells and piezometers began on February 26, 1980 and ended ' on March 51, 1980. Connecticut Test Borings of Seymour performed all ' of the drilling operations on the site. An all-terrain rig was utilized since the well and piezometer locations were unaccessible to truck rigs. The monitor well and piezometer installations were completed through ' the use of hollow stem auger drilling. Only boring B-9 was completed ' by mud rotary drilling. Split spoon samples (24-inch spoon) were taken at five foot intervals to determine the local geology and to optimize placement of the wells and piezometers. ' Boring locations B-7, B-8, B-9 and B-10 were completed as screened ' monitor well installations. All wells were screened 1-2 feet into the water table in the sandy soil just above the glacial take varved silts ' and clays. A five foot screen with slot size 0.010 inch was utilized in all cases. The bottom of the well screens were placed at depths ' FUSS&O'NEILL II-4 ranging from 10 feet to 17 feet. At all well locations, sand was placed Ito a depth of two feet above the screen, and a two foot bentonite seal was placed immediately above this. The wells were backfilled to the ' ground surface with sand, and concrete collars and protective casings were installed. Alt wells were plumbed and developed. Boring locations B-1 , B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-6 all were completed with Casagrande piezometer installations. Piezometers measure the ' pore pressure in fine-grained sediments. The bottom of the piezometers were located at a depth of 10-13 feet. The piezometers consisted of porous stone two feet in length with a capped bottom. Silica sand was placed around the piezometer to a depth of one foot above the installation. ' A .two foot upper bentonite seal was placed above this. The boring was backfilled to the ground surface with sand and original soil. Tamping ' of the silica sand, bentonite, and backfill was accomplished by use of a tamping hammer. The piezometer stones in all of the installations were attached to 1 inch i.d. P.V.C. riser pipes. Concrete collars and protective steel casings were used in at[ of the installations. Water levels in the piezometers were readily measured by using a coaxial cable and a Micronata 13,000 OHMS/VOLT Multitester. See Table No. III-1 for water levels at the individual installations. C. Site Geology ' 1 . Bedrock Although no bedrock coring was performed at the proposed site, regional information indicates that the bedrock is composed mainly FUSS&O'NEILL II-5 of reddish Triassic sedimentary rocks such as sandstone, sitt- stone and shale. Based on regional considerations, the bedrock ' in inferred to be dipping to the east. ' Accordingto the U.S.G.S. regional information the depth to bed- 9 � p ' rock at the site ranges from 50 to 100 feet for most of the site with localized regions fatting into the 10 to 50 foot and 100 to 150 ' foot depth to bedrock ranges. Detailed local interpretations of the configuration of the bedrock surface and depth to bedrock could not be completed due to the lack of confirmation of bedrock at most of the boringlocations. Refusal was encountered at two boring toca- g tions in the northwestern portion of the site. At boring B-1 re- fusal was encountered at a depth of 17.5 feet, at B-2 refusal was encountered at 21 .2 feet. This confirms regional interpretation of ' the depth to bedrock mapping which places depth to bedrock in that ' area at 10 to 50 feet. See appendix A and B for drilling logs and geologic profiles respectively. 2. Till In the Connecticut Valley region, tilt blankets the bedrock surface discontinuously. The till encountered on the Taylor & Fenn property was a red-brown silty compact tilt with some coarse-very fine sand ' and trace medium-fine gravel. This compact basal till was saturated at the three boring Locations (B-1 , B-2 and B-9) at which it was encountered. See Appendix A and B. Since most of the soil bor- ings were rather shallow, detailed localized interpretations of the FUSS&O'NEILL II-6 ' till unit cannot be made. However, boring information does suggest that the till is rather shallow in the northwest corner where it was found at elevation 19 to 22 and was 4 feet in thickness. At Boring ' No. 9, the till was found at elevation —3 and was also 4 feet in thickness. This suggests the till is a thin blanket overlying the bedrock. The bedrock surface slopes generally southerly in this 9 Y Y ' area. 3. Glacial Lake Deposits ' According to regional information, the predominant deposits at this site consist of varved glacial lake sediments up to 150 feet thick ' and alluvium up to 20 feet thick. According to the soil borings, almost the entire site consists of varved glacial lake silts and clays immediately overlying the glacial tilt and bedrock. See Appendix A and B. Each varve is composed of a coarse grained summer ' layer (silt with some clay) and a finer grained winter layer (clay with some silt). Soil boring investigations revealed that the clay layer was a tight to olive gray, whereas the silt layer tended to be ' a reddish brown color possibly originating from the Triassic deposits. Total varve thickness is an average of 3/4 inch. The thickness of the clay layer averages 1/8 to 1/4 inch, while the thickness of the silt layer averages 1/4 to 3/4 inch. 4. Overlying Deposits According to the regional information, the thickness of the material overlying the clay ranges from 0 to 20 feet. The SCS Soil Survey FUSS&O'NEILL II-7 for Hartford County reveals that the major deposits overlying the glacial lake sediments are: terrace soils consisting of lacustrine sand over silt and clay, terrace soils consisting of wind and water 1 deposited materials and alluvial soils. These sediments were ob- served at Borings No. 7, 8, 9 and 10 and ranged in thickness from 10 to 15 feet in thickness. In general, they are comprised of very ' fine to medium textured sand generally light in color unconformably overlying the lacustrine sediments previously discussed. It is 1 assumed at one time these sediments blanketed the entire area but have since been removed by excavation for brick manufacturing ' activities. Ii � 1 1 1 i FUSS&O'NEILL II-8 ' CHAPTER III HYDROGEOLOGY As stated, both piezometers and screened wells were installed in and around the proposed disposal area to define the groundwater flow system and the ultimate discharge area for these waters. In addition, the data developed ' on the groundwater system will be used to develop the design concept for the site. Essentially screened walls were established in the saturated fine to medium ' sand found overlying the lacustrine deposits in the southwest portion of the site. Piezometers were established at six locations in the clay pit excava- tion, The piezometers consist of a 2 foot length of porous stone attached ' to a 1/2 inch I.D. riser. The piezometers were set into the upper portion P of the varved lacustrine deposit to measure the piezometric surface near the top of the clay surface. ' Each groundwater installation was surveyed to establish a stable reference and the elevation of the groundwater Leval at each determined. Those data are shown on Plate No. 1 Water Map and Table No. III-1 . tAs can be discerned, the principal flow direction from the proposed dis- posat site is northwesterly towards discharge into the Podunk River. The surface of the lacustrine deposit is the dominant controlling feature on the ' shape of the piezometric surface. This is most evident in the former clay pit where the piezometric surface mimics the excavation. The overall flow FUSS&O"NEILL III-1 TABLE NO. III-1 GROUNDWATER LEVELS PROPOSED CASTING SAND DISPOSAL AREA TAYLOR & FENN DEVELOPMENT CORP. SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT Reference Groundwater ' Location No. Elevation Depth Level B-1 38. 13 3.71 34.42 B-2 38.95 3.00 35.95 B-3 44.28 5.00 39.28 B-4 42.91 3.85 39.06 B-5 44.61 7.40 37.21 B-6 56. 15 9.33 46.82 ' B-7 67.32 10.25 57.07 B-8 66.62 9.90 56.72 rB-9 67.39 12. 10 55.29 ' B-10 65.98 12.50 53.48 SW-1 29.98 0.75 29.23 ' SW-2 32.04 1 .05 30.97 ' Depth measured on March 6, 1981 except For Wells 2, 3 and 5 which were measured on March 17, 1981 . FUSS&O'NEILL III-2 direction to the Podunk River is, however, unchanged by this effect. The ' anticipated volume of seepage from the surface of the clay at time of spring groundwater conditions is estimated to be about 32800 gpd, given a horizontal permeability of the varved unit of 10-4 cm/sec, an inflow area into the excavation of 18,000 ft2 and a maximum observed hydraulic gradient of 0. 1 Ft/ft. At other times of the year, the seepage volume would be less than this volume and at times no seepage will occur. During the investiga- tion, seepage from the site was at a minimum. r t = FUSS&O'NEILL III-3 CHAPTER IV PROPOSED LANDFILL FOR CASTING SAND ' 1 . Waste Sources and Quantities The proposed disposal site consists of 27.2 acres of land as shown on Plate Nos. 1 and 2, Proposed Casting Sand Landfill. The landform is to be accomplished by landfilling casting sand and cover soil. The casting sand will be only that which is generated by the Taylor & Fenn Corp. in Windsor, Connecticut. Current generation rates are about 1100 cy/mo at a steady rate throughout the year. Delivery of sand to the site will be via a haul truck owned and operated by Taylor & Fenn. The casting sand wilt be free of waste pallets and other bulk waste materials. P Y 2. Sequence of Filling Landfilling will commence in the southeast portion of the existing ex- cavation and will progress in the northwesterly direction. This type of filling plan will allow for continued surface runoff away from the disposal area and the sequential completion of the proposed stormwater swate shown in the landform. Material excavations for use as cover soil and free draining backfill will begin in the southwest portion of the site and proceed westerly. Both free draining soil and silt-clay cover material are available in ' this area. The placement of the free draining cover is shown on the site cross-section. Its thickness and permeability is adequate to handle FUSS&O'NEILL IV-1 ' the anticipated flow volumes from both seepage out of the underlying lacustrine deposit and from infiltration through casting sand. The maximum quantities of anticipated seepage and infiltration water is discussed in Chapter V of this report, Environmental Impact. 3. Landfilling Methods The casting sand, landfill will be a modified trench fill method of opera- tion. The entire site is essentially a single three-sided trench. Filling ' will be on a 2:1 working face formed of the previous days waste. It will be spread and compacted as filling progresses. 4. Cover Material The waste material is presently used as daily and intermediate cover at the East Hartford landfill and has been used as such at the Windsor- Bloomfield landfill in the past. Due to this, it is proposed to cover the casting sand only at times when a dust problem may occur. At certain times, this implies the waste will be covered daily, at other times weekly covering of the working face will occur as necessary. Cover material will be soil suitable for use at a bulky waste landfill. Beneath the swale which is proposed along the perimeter of the landfill, 2 feet of compacted final cover will be used. Over finished slopes, 20 inches of final cover and 4 inches of loam will be applied. These surfaces will be planted with a grass seed mixture and maintained until a mature vegetative cover is established. FUSS&O'NEILL IV-2 ' 5. Site Preparation The site preparation at the casting sand disposal area is shown on Plate Nos. 2 and 3. Essentially, the prepared landfill surface will follow the existing excavation except in the southwest portion of the pro- perty where the site will be procedurally excavated to the contours shown prior to filling with casting sand. The prapared surface will drain to the northwest discharging beneath ' the existing access road in through a 24-inch culvert. Upstream of the culvert a porous sand dike will be constructed to filter surface ' runoff prior to discharge into the Podunk River. tPrior to landfilling with casting sand, a blanket of free draining material ' 2 feet in thickness will be placed over the excavated surface as shown. ' This is placed to control the local groundwater and maintain an unsaturated platform on which to conduct the casting sand landfill operation. An all-weather access road will be maintained from the street to the working face. Construction of this road will be accomplished prior ' to commencing operation at the site. The location of the road within the landfill area will vary as filling progresses. The existing bulky waste area will be closed in accordance with present solid waste regulations. An access control gate will be constructed ' along the southwest property line as shown to prevent illegal site access. The bulky waste area will be graded to a 3: 1 finished slope along its FUSS&O'NEILL IV-3 ' northern face with a 4% cross-slope along its upper surface. The ' site will be covered with 20 inches of clayey cover soil and 4 inches of loam. These surfaces will be seeded and maintained until a mature ' vegetative cover is established. The grading will be accomplished in ' a manner which will not further encroach into the Podunk River flood- plain. 6. Hours of Operation and Equipment The disposal area will be operated five days per week with working ' hours from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Casting sand will be delivered to the area by one truck owned and operated by Taylor & Fenn. One to ' three trips per day to the site will occur. These wastes will be de- posited at the working face. The waste will be spread and compacted on a periodic basis. This will be accomplished either by heavy equipment maintained on site by ' Taylor & Fenn or weekly by contract with a local heavy equipment ' operator. In either event, the responsible individual will become a certified landfill operator. ' The truck and landfill equipment will be equipped with first aide and emergency vehicle provision, in addition, a two-way radio will be re- quired in the landfill equipment for operator's safety. ' 7. Future Landuse ' The casting sand disposal area will blend with the surrounding terrace to ultimately produce a relatively level developable industrial parcel. 1 IV-4 FUSS&O'NEILL ' The casting sand will produce a structurally stable platform for this purpose. In addition, casting sand does not produce any odors, fire potential or decomposition gases that putrescible waste generates. ' Therefore, the construction of building on such a landfill is feasible and desirable. Some of the casting sand does have a slight burned odor immediately after the ' casting process. However, experience has shown that this slight odor ' diminishes rapidly and is not noticeable shortly after removal. 8. Landform Discussion The casting sand landform is shown on Plate No. 2. Essentially, it consists of a mounded 4/o upper surface sloping to the south, east ' and northeast. A swale is planned into the landform to accommodate ' planned future surface runoff from Chapel Road and associated industrial development to the south. That swale will be a riprapped swale. It ' will also accommodate surface runoff from the landfill. The northwest limit of the landform is delineated by a 20 foot buffer from the 100 year flood elevation. That slope will be a 3:1 finished slope, as shown. 1 The portion of the parcel delineated by the 100 year flood level will be ultimately donated to the Town of South Windsor. South Windsor has ' a goal to own or control land along the Podunk to better direct the rec- reational use of this water body. Taylor & Fenn Development Corp will ' FUSS&O'NEILL IV-5 retain the right of access across that parcel as well as the right to drain onto it. In addition, Taylor & Fenn Development Corp. has the right to drain and fill onto land owned by Plasticrete so that no im- pounded areas are created. 9. Buffer Zones ' As previously discussed, the parcel is being purchased from the ' Plasticrete Corporation. Plasticrete Corporation will continue to own land to the southeast, east and north of the proposed fill area. As part ' of the purchase agreement, the Taylor and Fenn Development Corporation has retained the right to fill with casing sand onto those remaining ' lands so that drainage problems will not develop. To the south of the proposed fill area, two (2) private owners exist. Those are shown ' on Plate No. 1 and consist of the Propane Gas Service Corporation and the Dunn Brothers Construction Company. A buffer of. about 50' and 35' respectively exists between these two properties and the limit of landfill when one includes the 20' railroad ' spur R.O.W. The proposed fill will not encumber either of these properties, in terms of their current land use or future drainage. These land uses can co-exist compatibly with the proposed casting ' sand operation. The owners of these parcels are aware of the proposed ' operation and have not, to date, expressed any objection. IV-6 FUSS&O'NEILL ' CHAPTER V ' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ' A. Groundwater Impact The potential for groundwater impact from the casting sand materials ' was examined by conducting leachate extraction tests, determination of groundwater flow and an evaluation of the site geology. ' As previously discussed in the Hydrogeologic discussion, it was deter- mined that groundwater flow from the proposed site is northwesterly ' to the Podunk River. Area wells supplying the business establishments ' south of the proposed landfill do exist. As can be seen, the natural flow direction is away from these wells. The groundwater contours ' were developed at a time when these businesses were functioning. No ' influences or pumping on the water levels were observed. ' The geology- of the area also precludes any adverse impact on these wells. Boring No. 9 penetrated 15 feet of sand overlying more than ' 50 feet of varved silt and clay. Testing of this geologic unit else- where has shown that the vertical premeability of the clay is less than 10-8 cm/sec. -The well supplying the industries along the existing ' road from Route 5 is reportedly a 275 foot deep, 6 inch well into the ' fractured bedrock. The clays overlying the bedrock preclude any ground- water flow from the casting sand landfill toward this well. The industries along Chapel Road are also upgradient of the proposed ' sites. These industries have shallow well points into th e he overlying FUSS&O'NEILL V-1 ' sands. A past contamination incident resulting from industrial solvents has severely contaminated the groundwater in this area. That con- taminated groundwater is reportedly flowing westerly across Route 5 ' in the groundwater in the overlying sand. Ultimately, this water is discharged to the Podunk River west of Route 5. The wells involved tin this contamination incident are shown on Plate No. 1 , Area Map. ' The flow direction was determined by the Connecticut Department of ' Environmental Protection to be westerly as shown. Public water is available in the project area. A few of the industries ' affected b the solvent contamination problem have connected to the y ' public system. ' Impact of groundwater flow from the disposal area on the Podunk River ' was evaluated. To complete that evaluation, some conservative assump- tions were made. The flow in the Podunk River was determined for the 7 day, 20 year recurrence interval based on the U.S.G.S. data and ' methods. The flow for that recurrence interval is determined to be 2.28 cfs or 1 .47 mgd at Route 30 below Vinton's Mill Pond. The actual ' flow would be somewhat higher at the site since it is further downstream. ' The low flow in the river was related to the anticipated groundwater ' outflow from the casting sand landfill. This flow determination was based on groundwater outflows recurrence interval ratings for stratified drift areas. It was determined that average annual outflow from such areas is 700,000 mgd/mi2 or about 16,400 gpd from the site. ' V-2 - FUSS&O'NEILL ' The anticipated leachate quality was estimated from the EP toxicity analyses using both pH 4 and distilled water extractions. These analyses, ' attached as Appendix C, were performed by both the Connecticut Depart- ment of Health and a private tab employed by Taylor & Fenn. The anticipated quality for critical parameters are displayed in Table V-1 . As can be seen from the analysis, the river water quality will be little ' changed as a result of the proposed casting sand disposal area. In ' no case will the aquatic standard for each parameter be exceeded and only the drinking water standard for iron is exceeded when the acid (pH 4) extract is used to determine the leachate quality. Iron is ubiquitous to the soils in the project area. A sample of sand from the Boring No. 7 yielded a net iron concentration of 4,700 mg/kg versus a concentration of 25300 mg/kg for the casting sand. The natural sand ' leached iron in the acid extraction test of 350 ug/l. The natural sand also contained 76 mg/kg of manganese and 10. 1 mg/kg of copper. The acid leachate from the sand also contained 290 ug/l ' of manganese. Neither the natural sand nor the casting sand will leach ' dissolved constituents at the rate observed in the acid extraction pro- cedure. The actual rate will, of course, be for less than those values. i The above suggests that the 15 acre casting sand disposal can be operated with no adverse impact to either nearby wells or the Podunk River. V-3 FUSS&O'NEILL TABLE V-1 WATER QUALITY EVALUATION Leachate Quality* River Quality** Critical Standards (,pug/1) (,Ug/l) pH 4 Human Health Parameter Distilled pH 4 Leachate Leachate Aquatic (Drinking Water) Arsenic 38 1 .42 .01 50 ,ug/l ( 50 pug/t) Copper 0 100 0 1 . 1 20 ,ug/l (1 ,000 pug/t) Iron 5,300 53,000 58.8 588.8 1 ,OOO ,ug/l ( 300 pug/l) Lead 0 100 0 1 . 1 100 ,ug/l ( 50 ,ug/l) Phenol 30 40 .331 .44 200 ,ug/l 300 ,ug/l Manganese 500 2,500 5.5 27.7 1 ,000 ,ug/t ( 50 ,,ug/l) *EPA toxicity extraction testing performed by Connecticut Department of Health extracting with distilled water and pH 4.0 water C Cn **Calculated by relating average annual anticipated groundwater z m r Q C O Z C W Z W `" Q In t f� i'� r. '•r"'r—'[, "•.}._^ t,- — •.: .' __. _7 } '; ♦ J } � /. r; .ty, a :�, ♦ � �7 r f i �� 'Tom, • e H�y �y a r' "1• i i t t S i! r r r s"�{ T.:,�k T 2+45�� y j:1,µr��. . t S a: tl�, Ma< '�..,7ra !.r. -` d; t t ,a t k :r7 Y i',,�� k r @�,,)v+•.Y i�}s +• !tt{ R' , , i k r r t i r{h.frhPd�4 j a / ♦ r r t s t r ht';bTZIN � �'rq � Z ' 1- :� s�r1 J 4 {..s�7a'r641 a�.t•"t i.'��sri {gym�.tn°` �}l �,• I ;! =`E t:;J4t jgx•yt !.a° .,la 2 . S r.-< ``"� S f �;tCi l Atkf ,� �tC( i rt �i '. �!` ,.�•� d a ;*mil '1g# � �. 3 �{�r it'f,' ♦.r s$ av: P 1 r{.i,t '; E r '!✓•4 i iL y. �' tF '; R '{#bars♦t�l, +'i ♦r .,' f t a s j rg; �, i t$ -;; ( :I V {1 "PatV �t11ritllr `' r J7S t y4 i .r. T--[t�d!, d,). i +�sj i Z i'F" ' r f Tar'" I ri�ia j( '6 +W t'').{w aJh _r -..r. r ,J L�'l Sf�'r$'�rlS-�i:,r •�... a �r 5�:�. r' ♦lx~ -. .../ i ��r�x j - F ♦,� }`,:l}�Wl �r t r } � r��i ! i? a,o 4# iv, r y: r �. , 4�Ak�, p •fj�t } .,;c+� ,. ` '+ •,� �:.ayi a r� .:: r�f!wY "„ a �i��'.'-l'X itr . '►�. u � A�.�') .._,,+t�•r t[..r� .�a�f� 1 �fELt"'iY ,; ri ,q k c ff 1.f } < rf' •j .Y <- 'r 2 $ - �.y( 4 5�1 a. y. t h FF♦ -.>3.r 3� t r_aL. ; `�'r rrt ��` � l !•a.`S i- y• t jdd{ir as ��� ; t 1 '�+Ta�t Yew '`t,: {St 1z .{�-. i♦.:;: .s'. _ F _ t _� , wY' ;'• sk7 u.'Y lu � O�1�tCCt� T�s horn s in it 115 < r, { 4tgrtdita1 12 WLu, 4 h ,J"bpi" tgyrY r s�,p ' .{�k l .: i-_� - � rt �� i'''ft e+ t...r= } a .i ti -s g:t.,, t''6ir�rt• }y'XaJ�.a•#f4+' 1.Fft. F.c T )t •°'- a 5..- lax r i.'i� `Ii ��if �1iD 4frr i'�r 4 I ' SUS-5� FACE �i� C�airl t8 P.O. bOX 6J S�YMOUa CC)N�l;' ! S►. rJ t}), "t V r #t *r'+:�•.:Fa_-r _ t� - 1 } .., .:. .:•. T:' � r. ;+(E3ft�.xei�t�rrui��ai:�''{1�,4-��:+1T.�+F�i ilk Cisii�+.clrF G't,.Nld,ticNuseTtl, �thodo`lelehd, Vermont J Yotk x r `'T•fTi?tr F a...t a•-.yc7�aµ T t; • Fa 1 q f a Meiris Nlw Ndffi��NtM Nbw ; New etsay. p�nnay�vmnla -r ,, t � g ,♦„�,� �;�y'��,�,. _ �a111 -� r �+�`xcN�az� �,r5j t � t -,,�! t{ ' '� �t C,•+-'�`rJ -��5"T a rl..i+ 71.`. it 't1•t r • , --:;EXPERIENCE J� fttef'' S'L+ 4>• 3-i• -4[k^"jtyt �xi I s_V t` i. Ir ♦4 r ' ty+fL } S:. -_ r�� l,. .. rri :1�4 ii•�?..ft � i�'' �w il.}...� ty1 -; 'C�lbn4 < a> F 'Ittisa do O Neill � t... :.a J _ --•t K . .� _ � r�� y.�:t12 Al a �k• t r 5}y r _. 't -:. _-.f ^f' f r ri t !r�,.r�,g q.,D1Sa Y� x ,tf t �s it r.` I).G a _��� a' Y} rS. ♦ f i ; ':3` i,i- A'$ �ISIV �D (Tl� � !�'M> 1i43 '{tlJri ant i + y Y ? t is s t if'•r ,�ri�n ,F'� kJ;)�i 4a U `•1y)y('�', 't15V4 or t. ' •• � /4 � 'C tt.4 '•YY a 'fit �.. prnJ�rt ate & Dann bevel. Corp. c�'?NbE�Ctfny+ �� t - ..;.N� r y S ,�� �+ S ' i •,�t�'"'dra rit qr fF: .�"Sr i[x . ;�,+� �py `a M" .t,3.�;r9f,< f Ltitf1�} tr•1d�f ;}tR S}1{��Y y 4 pt sr �Y l i ur' ri L .':.�i7C�l1nN1 iit -'�i�fiAac��• f!nthi. rtr,. t` Ny��,}yy .r_'Ik 4L3t•3:y 'MtrC I t• , ,.+f 4t°.' 71lr I:M1M �: OIIE;t ,: 7•;��kY ���;¢,ak }���"-,` .k c�.r }{i.� y♦ Jt J�"t)'t ''� :r t#lam Kp > ,y ` F }SYJ y +�' t },s �h a :F s :' -:� '�.t, 1F}f{^1 a- < " dr �,A. � ♦ } -t t jf!K *t Alir 1L L -..-.t•r¢R+(.h ('_..�. B,.nti+ >r}-. t s t ��! R l /1(�1-.-`.. t r ,. jt• E+�'iPs< t: }{' f' .f'J ?�K •'F ,y. 1. ` f e+'-r J -,,•ty �^j` W'i-�' +� r�4 a ., G'��.: •-.��"-^,it {����i e�rr�9y, 1'ta'Ir4f`+7rkkls ��!- it•s'4 4grStt� }j+ ...� ►.trF ♦` 0.6 9 Y r tyre iar ,} •rjr�di.,� r�} rim Er`f` �.Wtill: ?r t e r �r r��im♦h.�4 yt���.+fit,{'"�,Y 1 , �'k a .t � ny , } }� Wy !r �{_� Y d �},� r t r <,.- 1.. 1 ��� ' 'f .r T - ��,.} 1 :•. 1 , '�"�ai fit.'±l" a 1�•t},d .! ►itt),t4. iy�rE�a,��i e''yy�r�.wa}FT l?.,�+�i,,,T�f_r + t-.. Ep /�{j j .t'Ng.! � {y�� ,N�Z }1E} � �r� i e 1'"t!y'�•rx. t�n•i�jy':y�" tr :yT'1 jst i -: a1- • / •$k +1�, �., Y� /1' S�nli:`'•Y yi .ii �. �rh i'th..,a.LS��x1jT-'l��i�`•n -..l7a•� ��} .yi+j q4. �1°b �.. ,4. .i S �,-. Ata�t .;{k,t�d�;'.'.i i.i.'.•a,�„ .N�- i ��4�F�� I .Lilyr . i+ t ✓ trra Y 4 "y .fir: �� a{ jt 1 t S {i� t++i � p�;d wit ��111.r kgjjfjA f £_fir r+'£'N�t ; `i' Y i a �r { � �����U �.}�� d ySa i ;•)i ri �. T L -..•� �♦tr 1f1 ' ,,rr 1ti lr. f . � r? M�1 �,�F :'Y,'i�. +{,�F r � y.t + t t!r t L `7t {t` t t 'r 1� ! ] F 4..• t.If},,,. t ,- fxr't' �..:"MY s•:t~' sjr�r x{�;r to 1't 7� i; C r :i.. x:• t 7� Qt � r"•� ,. >{�r,� x F {r !- ,:@rl4f `#�tt �,jfsg St•"''�`Ya 9Eft ,-; �a .a (, i .t an 1 It•�yy4 + tr yiT,� �rF .,r¢.s:� �• k,(•. _t5 ). t T �� �'`} AAar f�21��r�'nYSyy"�J%�+�t • - '' - t `+t a �� rt S• t .�� a"'fa T .' rS � m T: L',l�r'iaiifi�igi� 1�� �r b�i�i�mp�i;s ai�Y eM1d t ♦'f{ fN{7�'.i N h f 't�+b ! �,E ,; r 3,) O +y "... !•y�.3S)_.ti+`: Lt h 'y JY,y oltydt x ;., , rflu y�i jse at► lit 19y-k 4 r 'i _ �°t_ -' !� ���tf'7ya;+���iyy rt �-r.1 _ + 4 - t •-94�j y- • t�,r � iy. v ;�+.t{'S a�y �"••�7{��}M ,� a'. �� ajrrly jZ�' L{�9;ltffE'.iw ut A♦ T i ..i<,+_t ; ig �Sf�'• <4�•i"y..,i.•��'�.: ('td•1 5fiy i^ r;i+c trrt ,a ' �'�itt�s�7�{if. -o ! X:4 ;r _ ^}(terTi - 7Fa..d••.fiith`^fidsR,t { "_�it"��'. , '�t i, ry.,!.'�t�y i'G.�` +rj•ytS's,$�'rr +, ,�� � _. _ t � -' p. ;��Ij 34f!��an+t�' !£ ��:i_ r{ ct'a,.'btrel�c r . •,.t,� tt a C r }.�•:+ j r:s .a i . "" . �•� 3..t- .6 r q�.y. t."air,r+f�'.-7[� i J-t f>.'. ! ^-'E-•+"7�b•�,J4i► �'T ��'� F� �ri y ;: r t,- a _ _ 'e. _r �,r�:at r � .SKy�'yT"' ��t�'1:fi Diu -Vi rt 'r: r t•f Kt' .f r � 4 - d.•- 2 Jw t- i .� rfr�?• t�'J:fi: '_c(,:t„"L` fi� rt•t 'f t s J t - - r of j s's� � r#r 1T' -£ 4"..t y t. t I*r *Ll,,;�r r i{ ,..t�r�i Jr,'jj��r -P f`<> r '+ � P�', _ a ^f E•Y`Yi�`i �,� u - M1>7� silari{+r { it l- '.l � � (.•l k A.'- } y f f t a {•. t r ,y ? tr a ..r ' _ >.Nf .i•IjisC, w; '`' a► ¢� •� + �:: � -;• 1xHV�Lsfg4idl e i �.,•-�<f +.r-r�SF. t .?t•,.t'Y. ,..t.,:•. �- .T i ., .. � •R - 1'�a� t'�� ii�• -as ,' - ..._ x. f + ' our 888 3857 • fr T .,.- ,. � £ 5,r3} w•{ � U�l {� . - + ! i.)e: 1•� •Pf �.si•��y .it .). ' U# ):� � t aa'•x• "i t r L .x t 3• cJ tF ': -Ei .+: ,Y 7- 7 i -j.�.�•(,y Rt.s � �;.-t d;F ;tY ro�,y y�,..?L i ,t'r'�_ f •.:�i 7{ ai'Y i r �� }7 ��. k ►;, L r SUB tUikh'C SPWALI S i t30k iS�t: SEY�Ibb � CbNN !, •�,, �' '` ,�,� S�RW�1�3t'`C'onne�Fieu� .�laiiae�tuseifs k�oe�e�is�ond'Vermoti� }'r >•i ''�'� , i�•� �i r' `�tb +;-� ��r.6i 1yi ,f"•s�s Wamp iAd�ne Hshire flew Torn,.hew Jerieya �en�tiylvdt{t�4 jmi "' eL e r f t�f'i� ^� z�• yi:..:Yf.-� g,�Yt' Y y:.. •-t'- a �y�:.. _.r_ t t ti t -it:.- ■.. i ia[[a'�'•'��'? °-♦ Y' .a!P•r� �s�� � -S{ t°`..:f,� �_t; i�,~.' - ;.� Conner �ccrs Tes Boren s■ inc,--g � i �_k{E�.�a�,tj-sr�r+qi= � �r�A� x �.`•, f G ,; i,, �tY PS J.x{ �t1, OpY � :f .} ',i' �• -. •.'R�-` "'�.q _ { K„�" i�t _ra.� 's.p.;t s. -�'�"`, x V t-, • � —`+h' t ".UV CO REL/i���J, \.In tl C"`ir 'r t a• Ir,Ls,.a.� 'tif"' ter-. r -i a .. •cb c'{3rf,'' .S- +� S' Kirks r' x t Yi°rxi1 a [�, * jLana :re`t t•1` �r 1?.`.,'" Z :"tid„��' s `!.•^:: :•x '^r { -''i a`lt-•5e. � ` � '_F'r! s�•, � w'+t s'-r� r.,;�,_r�4.,: :t..L� . 'rt 3t s t 1; a' PETRAT�O RESISTANCE & SOIL PLO ERTIE w� '� � t t}•�}}.t-;'- a'.`-?'.+ 'R �k� q"5 i �y ,g\� YA i dd.7-'�"..y� x•r r •_x`r`•."ra } ; !r f.. i� � � �f'•i�d�� i t Predominant sand anlf gravetr �, :,° Predohiinant".silt.8 clay� ; .t 6 f H3} q3 1K-c, t-t' i iil- , i !Y#/ ..�: # �t.l M v-,.3 i +_ •7 rrfc s,,..p.li<" r4{'T'.e sir k Lt'•i` sY'�['�ia coi�Esi"bNEss ,4 T _n so coHt=s .. ` so�Ls a ;T` connPlssly Blows per foot �tr wr _` i Relative bent ity �, Blows per foot'a ConsitgiicY' Streit th ( u' � rat 1 Y - q . .,+ t c . .•fir=,Fr S- * k! 0 to 4 r ° , 3 rr` very loose 0 to> ? very toAi loose:, 2 to; to 5tl f, 10 to 30 'fig 1 medium 4td 8( tnediGm 5tl to b _ "30 to>5b , � ' Ir j dense 8 to 15 1 to`Y s §tiff over 50 S Cr ��i` s �� very dense 15 to 30 . very stiff 2 to 4' s, '^ �.p . r r r.: t-^ Yrl over 30. hard s: Nov � a ` NOTES r Above base on 2 O.b.sampler x 1 3%8"i.d. 14D Wt.x 30" i=a11 tquf i u` St MsFTt i tons per square Loot xf � 4 STATE OF CONI�ECT�Ci1T BASIC tlUlotNo cook `[�� ' ) r7. K }{,l1i � �t S S" +J S" .�a e t " , ,,,�•' tY.«11 i t k y- r-L�'r �i ,,' :ry ,r ,•+ .. -s 9 i- 76! f AbL� I PHLSUMPT��/E SURFACE SEAk1Rb VALbE' S bP PbUWbAT�b�I ' e s r K : •,,f 2 r _. -} cF r i , t -.. i s i Yt _{ 1*��t' ^.\ Yx ,.� r ",��. is r _ Ir t�,.t. ,r'�+1t > •-d .+• y t(ro)3 N ''� • ... 1'- 'f..{�� t r�.. � "�y _�;. ._ � :. y. - 3�' ✓.� ,� p f ��t t_.4 T ^{ 'e t3 n 1ry Ff r4i. ,r; .CLASS OP.MATERIAL .�xi�.,,1t�,,I.,,1�},15tA�!!�_ �Vgi. „' Illassi�re ctyst8iline bad ruck including grahite dloritr ri i bk hard ,y + [:�` i, t r r , e ss,trap ro � . x t �, SgUare�bot ' imest one andtlolomite ;.�t r :t' _'.' x rFy udliget�eimestofie,schist 8nd.slgte iii so(INd cdidiieHa st - �4 Jt �'•t' 1Y: rY+ y4' gi4jYt„�`�t' p(' 4K "� ,{j' a. ,f 4,,.� i r s. tl w �e1j.•L+•i..r. ,eta ryyf'�i •'P i'Y� [ A - SSA r.j��C 7 NP 4 •7S4 [.yY '4y ��YY xrtt,{ w.•. �. c °t. � ed�trtentary, oe�C rl �llt�i i �tat�shales,to asiohet,anj AD bug�ly cirmented cong�otneratif ;,r: ,�;��• 1'.. -� 'r f e`' f:. ''•+S .v.•� t�}tR t.` ,., - i ):: - .ri.. +Ie. "t ya r� j f t to t tt is. Soft or rO�Ce 66 FR �'exClUq�ltg sh81e� an�soft lih esforie: } ; }` r�'Y�-•.'y-- •i`(ly •`ry:..:� rr t , .z :., :�[ y2z_ •� �• F;+ -._i: 3>t 4.t..r Ff 'z .iff' dj,i is Compacteg,part�a��y ceMented gravels,sanii and haraj�ati bverlVin tbc�Ca r ' ' '?� ' '# i'}` F 1U�*,. .7 ,,,a i •:i I i� - x ,-,^� ' r..i.' � , �7 .:E t S>,�tll •y4 ' Ki'f (� - ': ,� :: t - �r ,'ram �` r,f�u # i t^1 �` ��J Tsq'� •fT:x. 8 braves and kin1greve� mixtures [r r '' Lobse raiie�1fa4.dfj clay ep'mpac�coarse saii� ,,arid so y�` � t '` _ g :r.. r s , d Sha�il's 1. r r - �_ 1 ,,..' .C. •? r-] :r5 kid' + —cl', r _ •�-'.,�° a� v:= �•,.- �ti::i 7�ts�",t�.�ia�;, ;ktZ• p_,���-,.� ����j�_, r r<.> .n�, oose�co�tse send k d sand-Orave�niix�Urea arfi compact �l�e sated confinbd►' r r' s <,;� S ._,,, ' :. t r!{� :rr r i} {��r.:►.. it ..'`I _.` t 1` `q + �� ` �r ,r �.gt�sa,tn��rUm aar�l� con�ined�"stiff ciaYj >'� �:, i ,> �-•tEt� ��>,��. } �R� 4� -�`� 3�� �+ ,,�5 Soft btd Cei shale,soft clay .s.. F�.a s�y r { J>•A'z s •s3it i� '' .�,cS..r.;r4`C 1 t(.-r l .,.•. k .r- Y � F .i <4ttA na' r.. Est, y.t �c Y a2 Sf4 r r h t-- p S f y 1 '�i1).. .t✓ z.��r3#cfi f3i r �, # ✓� `�Yte r�•A t k' .,ta'f - 4 K :Ar {� 41} b y ,tLt i7+} / '-Yf Yx-. f t 'Yj •"`. Y '�'a "{� ' Y 1xj4xi s'Y .i � •�- ,r!' 4 a,.�r� s t 1x�i4�r)fi.�� t',k ty j x} F - 'f .: � Ye'a9'7��` t-.� ,t+;�` � "� _ aR��yf� [- [t 1 s rie r� e-.r.�"}'-,•�q :ice + 3: -?..r �1ri i #` 't r � '} t r�Sd Y _-t., +�-, �t_J �i �": � rii r1,r '(•P r - x � y x t r9 ,,il it �4* ypr r -j� �� ' ,�". . �S'..;..,irr � s + �-. '� ,+ -'•N.'fir<�d„� � a -1 '} � ham. i + �� `3'f � �r 3 {; '"x - lr`• -�� -tt } f I 5 Y 'Il.i •�Y-Y I J Ci h �M ,•r '4 ] �..-*t r"•� k',rt`' +,rt�+ j r r ,,; y ��-1,. - � - �F�;c F" � ? tr{• x �� s �•,,..++ }�y�,ti�4ir�'7r t�5 � i r w7s F 7 1i L' -E z [- � j -f�� � r4:�•"i"'��R f- i w ,' �. �,`i z"r`iy4 :; s ri {i �`+t !f Ss,a : �w �• �'��S.-1 Y �����'� i '�-t �10 OW STEk�:At�GERIN i .• DRY SAMPLING (�NDIStbRBEb SA IPLI I� �:`PIEZOMETEi� iNSal TI0"1 • CORL 0ORiNGS�'' l3',= J f_�.�it'-•eft ." �r.,R �L,,�i yy[��, .y1i � r� � _ �... .,ice Y'. { ��fS_3Y3_z.t�,+�`_:�{ ,aUT''`L`T7:'�-hYn�4�i_t"� �.:a;I '���S.i�'-2�r!F;x4 tt'.ip`z _-_t:r 'l�,SY'.j:,v_i,l;��Au '�'s--w_ •dl.-.yc.�1."�il�A'� "-:�:�.�ail�P; E START SOIL SAMPLING LOG SHEET........1.......of. ....... CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. E FINISH 4-ai Sub-Surface Specialists PROJ. NO. ............................................. GHT OF HAMMER 140 .200 P. O.Box 69 LOCATION Taylor � YennDevel, Feu . ........:ao" zQc ..:.:... .. SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT :tuN1ti.*J�T>�; S. Windsor Cann. 1 _ (203) 888.3857 GROUND WATER FSET OBSERVATIONS e'' OF DATE TIME DEPTH "F ELEVATION ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND s F.,. .,. Q... y W IRISA ✓� ©8N ei� €ntr s. ' HOLE N6.1 Z10 u i7gi�. t 1 i e 3 CASING SAMPLER CORE BARRE t PLER O.D. 20 D. M •. } S dRni`I!.`�i TYPE .fie Bt1o18etAr QOIIB: q TYPE Of RIG H s SIZE I.D. !� »..._, ..wM.... ..... BLOWS PER 6" SAMPLE ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE SAMPLE Dspth. NO Type OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS Surface DEPTHS p1e From To CONSIST. DEPTH REMARKS ELEV.FT. 0.6 6-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. NO. PEN RFC. 1'to SS ji V.Comp 1' Drk br. sand and siltil, roots. . 2' dry Yellow bx. ♦.f-c mad, tre ailt. €` 5'to S3 2 1 2 Soft Fid. bfr. silty soar clayip •lit. gry silt. 9 ip 1 K wet 10 !o to SS 2 i IV.Soft lid. br, silt and clay, lit, gry silt. 4 1 p 46 21'6" wet 15 to SS 5 14 M.Comp 1 ' 4 1 16'6" wet r d. bri wilt, some o--f gxaay.p lit. sand, ' 47 . -Aueret! Tr 17 to l7iatc rock, — I efuaaT on HSA. - 20 ' Bottoa of boring 17'6910 - NM Es Installed piesoneter stone 1011 below grade. Total len&.h of pipe and. o - atone 1216". Protective sleeves installed wAock and concreted. W - - L9 lu - - -40 r ` Proportions used:tray=010%,little= 10.20%.some=20.35%,and=35-50% � TOTAL fOOTAGEs DRILLER: J•D• SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY Z HELPER: J e B. C=CORED W=WASHED 0-10 LOOSE Fortis Benny h. SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP. iock Caring Ft. ENGINEER. UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 30.50 DENSE 6 10-TEST PIT 50 VERY DENSE 5/l3 DRILLING INSPECTOR UT UNDISTURBED THINWALL HOLE NO. itAt .' ''}t SOIL SAMPLING LOG. �D�START " 3-5-81 - SHEET.......� .....of... ...:.. CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. OA FINISH Sub-Surface Specialists" ` PROD. NO. ................................... ........ W HT OF HAMMER 140 ?390 P.O.Box 69 LOCATION Taylor di eM D6Ye1. SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT H FALL ..........W, ., =_...... ......... ujo_ = S. Nind>Isort Cont. - (203) 888 3857- ry GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS - fi"N�: _ ti:.• ' _ _ OFFSET _- DATE TIM4 DEPTH..* ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND ELEVATION a , .vy-. t L c"0 v eill > HOLE NO: r i 2l6ain Street '� _ CASING - SAMPLER CORE BARREL S LER O.D. Z« LD. "� t �• Manehester. come Ob040 TYPE TYPE OF RIG H is RO SIIE LD. •�AF�.. ... ...3J� '. ' BLOWS PER 6" SAMPLE DENSITY PROFILE ON SAMPLER SAMPLE Depth NO. Type OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS below DEPTHS p1e From To CONSIST, DEPTH REMARKS i ELEV.FT. 0_6 6-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. _ NO. PEN REC. -- 19to SS 2 1 2 Soft 3" drk bare &Ut, roots, 1 24 i ` ' _ 2 wet Ed. 1w. silt.,& slag, lit. gry silty clay, lit. roots. 51to SS 2 2 1 Soft Rd. -ba`a silt & clay, 1 it. gry clay. 2 IF' 1 616" wet 1p 10'to SS 1 1 2 V.Soft Rd. br. clay & silt, lit. gry silty clay. 1 18 1R 11 a 6" fret 15 to SS 2 2 4 Soft hde bore silt. lit. clay, lit. gry silt. 4 1 1%� 166 6" wet i 96" d. s & .gray., M. iZd. �-20 20 t0 SS 10 29 7 V 3"V.Ikise 2011 " 14 21*r 2192" Firs d weathered wilt stone. bottom of boring 219 3"a -- Installed piesrometer stone 109 below grade, ' total length of pies ometer do pipe 12.6", installed protective pipe Klock concrete 30 .40 i� Proportions used:tray=0.1096,little=10.2096,some=20.3596,and=35-3096 TOTAL FOOTAGE: DRILLER. J•D• SAMPLE TYPE -" COHESIONLESS DENSITY DR Z DR a•�• C=CORED W=WASHED 0.10 LOOSE Earth Baring Ft. HELPER:' SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP. Rods Coring ft. SOILS ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 30-30 DENSE TP TEST PIT 30} VERY DENSE HOLE NO. 8/73 DRILLING INSPECTOR: UT=UNDISTURBED THINWALL 'fq`'al:.f aC .�',S��'1,.,�2==.�:,. .-s' ibat+='r-i"`i��. ;F� _ •..'P�i�' �.,�::.� �., ..� �:. ` START SOIL SAMPLING LOG Do 3-4-81 SHEET of 1 CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. D FINISH �+- 1 ' PROD. NO. ..1..... ... Sub-Surface Specialist .1 1 HT OF HAMMER 140 ;3W P. O.Box 69 LOCATION Ta ZOY' @riTi Y9Z SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT ;, FALL ..............30 2A........: ...:..... ]tME:.A:SJA4C Se Windsor, coma. " - (203) 888 3857 GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS ' + OFFSET. DATE TIME DEPTH #ek 'sxyp `s s� 4 ESPECIA COMPILED R + GROUND ELEVATION Al '! LLY C MP ED FOR )t O 1 Y�� • - 1 y f bra J- .Z 3 &,.O N eSll `=' HOLE NO.. ....... ... 216 *xiia StYe� ` y � " CASING SAMPLER CORE BARREI 5 PLER O.D. ~ I D. B1 i- * Hai�CheBCome f TYPE . H tere' Coon a o60 TYPE OF RIG K dY�lulic SIZE LD. M 't SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6" a Depth Type DENSITY PROFILE ON SAMPLER SAMPLE Below NO. OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS _ Surface DEPTHS Sa le From To CONSIST. DEPTH REMARKS p t NO. PEN REC. ,,. ELEV.FT. 0.6 6-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. he 0011111P drk br.. sand ricks silt 8 to SS i 1 moist � � b � _ • roots. , 2! &'1t tlr.'v.f-a Saud and ailto lit. ' 0 roots. �. ; 5•to SS 3 2 _Soft Gry y & silt, scale fiMxf-layers_ of rd. P 18 111 wet br. clay s nd an t. 10 TO to 93 2 2 2 Soft Gry &. some rd. br. varved "- " clay & ail t. A s 11.6" wet SS 1 2 1 Y.Soft -- Ed. br. clay & ant. acne gzy silt and clay, 1A 1R 16 6" wet L t 20 to SS 1 2 1 V.Soft M bt. wilt, some clay, lit, gry clay. K 1A +R 21•6" wet 2106 - F - - - Bottom of boring 2111601, 3.0 _ NOTM Dmtallsd piesecaster atone 100 below grade, total length of pipe & stone -30 s 1296". Fzotective aleeves installed, xA*a and aanor eted. W g' N Proportions used:!race=0.10%,little=10.20%.some=20.33%,and=35-50% TOTAL FOOTAGE: DRILLER: J.D. SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY 'Z' HELPERS J.B. C=CORED W=WASHED 0-10 LOOSE Earth Boring Pt. F SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED. COMP. SOILS ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON -50 DENSE } Roth 6/73 r _fir - :-T►=3EST PIT 30+ VERY-0ENSE .y . HOLE NO. DRILLING INSPECTOR: y UT UNDI�SrTURBED THINWALL {��- :r�" '�'�+� a'f�e_' .:�`'??'7FF�''r.���S�.L�..� ��xri�+.�`'..�'�L '�[_'1..` T#� �"B,�� �w"�.�+€`-�:7',F�^"I� ��.•.S",�� -1, .— D START .? -4-81 SOIL SAMPLING LOG SHEET........ ......of.. ....::. �� p r CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. DATE FINISH ysf^'oi PROD. NO. ........ ... ........ J Sub-Surface Speckalists P. O.Box 69 LOCATION HT OF HAMMER 140 -moo P. dL Fenn 'De'VCi. '�. .• SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT 17NE:1GJSTJ!" i e �►ind60r, H FALL,' ........ 30,. 3 ... : . P Ooini (203) 888 3857 r# OFFSET AGROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS SATE TIME ; DEPTH e : s ar 3} rta� ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND ELEVATION } r �0 . o- +n'd �.. r Ya3lifCia' � L HOLE NO.* '` �`�# 5 ; t m r fv v � e� fa- Lea ;3 CASING SAMPLER CORARREI e ff - L 0 i7s� S LE OD 42 � I.D.a 1�3 TYPE s . IC R Manchester Conn., ` 86046' �'' Y E OF RIG' SIZE I.D. Q w • BLOWS PER 6" ; SAMPLE ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE SAMPLE 11 Depth NO. Type OR CHANGE ~FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS r Below DEPTHS From To CONSIST. DEPTH Surf" Sample REMARKS NO. PEN REC. ELEV.FT. 0.6 6.12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. cpw 1. to SS 2 3 2 Soft kedai" gry 01a7. 1 24 24 • 2 saint S to SS 1 1 2 Soft Same 2 18 18 606" _ wet .,' l0 10"to SS 1 1 2 Soft Sane 18 11 a 6" wet 150 SS 1 2 2 Soft Same 4 8 18 696" met s 20 SS 1 12 1 Soft Sim 5 18 18 20 wet 0 " 21 6 Bottom of boring 2116". NOTHs Installed piesmater atone 100 below o Sradet total length of w6". . Protective a7.eel 6a installed wAock 30 and eoumceted. c� Wf4O N Proportions used:trace=0-10%,little= 10-20%,some c 20.33%,and c 35-30% TOTAL FOOTAGE: F DRILLER: SAMPLE TYPE t COHESIONLESS DENSITY Z HELPER: JOB4 C o CORED ' W c WASHED _ 0-10 LOOSE Earth Swing 55 c SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED. COMP. Rock Coring Ft. SOILS EPKsINEER q UP c UNDISTURBED PISTON 30-50 DENSE 548 iP TEST PIT c 30+ VERY DENSE HOLE NO DRILLING INSPECTOR - ` �:UT UNDISTURBED THINWALIL �s fit`; v• !r } SOIL SAMPLING LOG E START 4-81 SHEET of .... ...... CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. E FINISH j" _81 Sub-Surface Specialists PROI. NO ... ... .. ......... MIGHT OF HAMMER 140 53A P. O. Box 69 LOCATION Tg jor & Fenn D.eVel. " SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT FALL. ;.......30" amc.:..:...: TINE-smA{ S. Windsor Conn. _ (203) 888-3857 GR OFFSET OUND WATER OBSERVATIONS " DATE TIME DEPTH - + p = n ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND ELEVATION L. Q..1=4. Y 1 F1lss dC HOLE 210 a Striet $ s CASING SAMPLER CORE BARRI PLER 2r O.D. IA. TYPE sL7i� a7� t _ l4aAChestor COT1Ct. G �j TYPE OF RIG H dmilic RotarySIZE I.D. t4�....._t �... {!~ . __............... BLOWS PER 6" SAMPLE DENSITY PROFILE Depth NO Type ON SAMPLER SAMPLE OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS Wow DEPTHS P From To CONSIST. DEPTH S REMARKS ELEV.FT. Sample p� 6-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. NO. PEN REC. V to Ss 4 Soft Gry clay 4 • 4 moist 51to SS 2 2 2 Soft Gry clay. �� t 6'6" fret 10 10 to 53 1 2 2 Soft Gry slay. 1 t F 11'6" wet 10 15 to SS 1 2 2 Soft Suddish gry olaye tL t o 1 Q 16`6" wet .20 'to 88 oft Same K 1 R 1 A 21960 wet 2116" hh Bottom of boring 21960. I NOTES Lwtsll,ed piesometer atone 10• below - — gr"e, total length of pipe & stone -30 _12116". Protective al.eeves installed wAock and concreted. IL J • Proportions used:trace=0-10%,little= 10.20%.some=20-35%,and=35-SM TOTAL FOOTAGE: COHESIONLE r r DRILLER: �eIIe SAMPLE TYPE _ SS DENSITY Earth Bwiny - Ft. k HELPER: J.D. C=CORED W=WASHED 0-10 LOOSE SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP. Rock CarbtR Ft. SOILS_ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 30-SO DENSE TP=TEST PIT 50+ VERY DENSE HOLE NO. S3 DRILLING INSPECTOR - UT UNDISTURBED THINWALL SOIL SAMPLING LOG E START 81 SHEET...... .......of ....., �y .��Q CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. : s E FINISH J••1'�1 Sub-Surface Specialists PROJ. NO GHT Of HAMMER 140 :'300 P. O. Box 69 LOCATION a rt Taylor Fenn Devel. . SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT FALL : 3a' sa.:..:::.- , ; ;.tNkA�t S.:itindsor Conn... w, (203) 888-3857 GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS, .; .,: t_ OFFS a DATE TIME DEPTH ;. ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND ELEVATION . .: .. �:... t�� sS_ 7f I A ! ' r. x �+�L " r� O•N eln' HOLE NO. - 21O aD 3tT6et CASING u SAMPLEft CORE BARRI PLEB O.D. 2" r 17' TYPE Manchester, 'Conn• 06040 H 8ranlic F O a r ` TYPE aF RIG ,. SIZE I.D. ...� .... �... .........:. ............ BLOWS PER b" - - • Depth SAMPLE Type ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE yp SAMPLE NO. OR CHANGE FIE LD IDENTIFiCATi OF SOILS Below DEPTHS Of To CONSIST. DEPTH Surface ELEV FT Sample 0-6 b-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. ' REMARKS NO. PEN REC. 1'to SS Soft - Gry clay. 1 24 24 ' 4 moist •' > 5•to SS ! 1 2 Soft Sue �N 616" moist 10 10 to s5 1 -2 . 1 Soft Same ? 18 1 A s. 1116" moist r•:, 5 to SS 2 1 1 Soft Same 16'6" moist 20 to SS 1 2 2• Soft Same a IA 1 R 21116" Moist 2 to SS 2 1 2 Soft Same 1R R •6" hoist �o to BS 1-� 2 1 Solt Base ` '6" moist !,¢" Bottca of boring 31#6". NOT14 Installed piesometer stone 13010" below grade plus 206" above grade, total of pipe do stone 1604".. - Protective sleeves installed and concreted. — -71 - Proportions used:trace a 0-10%,little a 10-20%,some=20-33%,and o 35-SO% � TOTAL FOOTAGE: F DRILLER: Jy D' SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY Earth BoringFt. HELPER: ,.Be C c CORED W v WASHED 0.10 LOOSE SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP. CorinSOILS ENGINEER: w UP c UNDISTURBED PISTON 30.50 DENSE ROB ft. 6/78 DRILLING INSPECTOR: TEST PIT 'fOf VERY DENSE HOLE NO K '"'Ra BUT UNDISTURBED THINWALL* , # SOIL SAMPLING LOG E START 2-2 f-81 - _ SHEET..... 1.......of 1.:..... CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. TE FINISH 3-2"$1 Sub-Surface Specialist PROD. NO. .......... ......................... MIGHT OF HAMMER 140 X10D P. O. Box 69 LOCATION Taylor & F'eT3n DeVel• SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT ALL ........ 3&. ........... ...... x1him is S. Windsor, Conn. (203) 888-3857 E GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS OFFSET ° DATE TIME ,: DEPTH . .` GROUND ELEVATION ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR � .. .Q hra Y 7 " - 3 0 hrs. 6 P '' I188 O+N ein HOLE NO. ....: ..:.. M rain 1Vt . . w s N street : 2CASING SAMPLER CORE BARR y PLER O.D. 2 I D i rAndhesaterI Conn• 06044 TYPE .fM�R _.. ` d�csulic Po TYPE OF RIG A ~ r SIZE LD. �. 3/8 u SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6" DENSITY PROFILE Depth Type ON SAMPLER OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS SAMPLE NO. Below DEPTHS °f From To CONSIST. DEPTH REMARKS NO. PEN REC. Surfoce ELEV.FT. Sample MOISTURE EIEV. p •,-, 0 6 6-12 12-18 1 to w .5 a n.c;(map is drk two., send, some silt, roots 1 24 I 3 4 dry Yellow fir.;IV*f-'M "nd, tr. Silt. 5 to S3 7 9 M.Comp Lt. .I. v.f-a sand. lit. c-aand, tr. silt, P 1R 11c 616" dry 5 M.CO&P Tan bra & some yellow br. v.f-a sand, some -1 18 l4 1116" wet c-vec same 10 1 � _ Y.Soft Lt. gry clay & allt with a>asll sews of 4 18 18 1b b ' wet f-c Sand, lit. rd, br. milt. F_ V.Soft * grY 911t & clay layer Wf smaller rd. br. 5 18 ft8 -20 ZI b" wet C3ayey silt layer. o 3S W JIH 2 Y.Soft Gry & some rd. br. clay, ooze silt. 6 18 18 2b b" fret a Y.Soft Gry clay do ant varied with SIW or layers 7 18 6 -30 wet « of rde br. Clay. i•6 � _ W Bottoa of boring 31060. NOT& Installed 1016" PYC plus S• screen, W - - - tatal.of 13@6",.:13•_ below -grade• 206" above grade, Sanded, waled. Also installed concreted ,5060 protective steel sleeve, locked and vented. _40 Proportions used:trace=0-10%.littl.=10.20%.some=20.33%,and=35-SO% TOTAL FOOTAGE: DRILLER: SAMPLE TYPE ' ,. COHESIONLESS DENSITY Eorth Boring h. HELPER: e e C c CORED W e WASHED 0 10 LOOSE SS—SPLIT SPOON 1040 MED. COMP. Rock Coring h. SOILS ENGINEER: UP c UNDISTURBED PISTON 30-SO DENSE TP TEST . 30-} VERY-DENSE 3 + S/78 DRILLING INSPECTOR +✓ .t UT=UNDISTURBED THINWALL ; NOTE NO. .T:: t .3 .L .s> ::'.R`t rv*`�-'.' 23'.• �� a.•'=.f �vs; �€";. �:'�R r'�c, ;��, S SOIL SAMPLING LOG E START _2-81 SHEET.......�.......of. �....... CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. E FINISH —2 _ Sub-Surface Specialists PRO1. NO. ... ........ ......... GHT OF HAMMER 140 ADD P. O.Box 69 LOCATION ry�ylOi @ran Dev@1 e SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT Allf u A S. il'in�aor, Conn: 30" . ......:. ......:. IE ,,ST (203) 888-3857 > GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS OFFSET s DATE - TIME - DEPTH - ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR TIONGROUND ELEVA 2 a t hr S, : Fu88 OBNei $ HOLE NO 2 t_ a IgW rM$4li` $treat ' ; _ CASING, SAMPLER CORE BARRE 210 FT PLER O.D. * LD• N TYPE iTLT Xanchester -Cronn• ' l SIZE I.D. ... ..............* {4.... /..� TYPE OF RIG 1 - ��� 8 BLOWS PER 61, Depth SAMPLE Type. ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE „ Below, NO' ofSAMPLE OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS DEPTHS From To CONSIST. DEPTH a' Surface ELEV.FT. So-p" MOISTURE ELEV. REMARKS NO. PEN REC. 0.6 6-12 12-18 <- 1 to S3 c 89 ri.Comp 1 itr, do orange br. v.f-c sand, lit, silt. 1 24 18 11 dry DA 'tr, do br, v,f--c sand, tr. roota, tr. — 40 51,to S9 1 4; 7 M.Coslp Yellow br v.f-m sand, tr. silt. �' 9 1 R 14 6'6" dry 99 _ 10 1© to 33 2 1 2 Y.So:t Us gry silty clay, lit. rd.. bi. silt _ .4 t F. 1 F 1116" wet layers. -Y5f to 3S WG,. 1 1 Ye Soft Gry clay, acne silt varved with syal3 er 4 1 P 1616" wet layers of•rd, br. silt. 201to SS 1 2 3 ' Soft Bdo br, clay do silt varved with some gry tft lip 06" wet silt, some clay. 2 'to 4S 1 2 Soft ]Rd* bra allt clay, lit/some gry clay in F +R 1R 2616" wet silt varves. .o 1-30 to SS 1 2 2 Soft Rd. 'br. ant & clay varved with gry silt, 7 18 18 116" wet , " some clay. < i6 f Bottan of boring 3186"e Q' 10TR! Installed 7'6` PVC plus 5' screen for W total length of 1216"R 10' below grade, 216" above grade. Also protec- tive pipe rising 206" above grade, 2 concreted, locked, vented. P W r '-10 Proportions used:trace=0-10%,IW6=10-20%,some-20-33%,and=35-30% TOTAL FOOTAGE: p� DRILLER: J.D. SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY Earth Baring Ft- Z HELPER: J•S. C c CORED W e WASHED 0-10 LOOSE S5=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP. Rock Coring p. SOILS ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 3030 DENSE S/7S R TP c TEST PIT 50+ VERY DENSE _ DRILLING_1NSPECTOR ' r UT_..UNDISTURBED THINWALL � y - HOLE NO. Ilc '.y,_ ay, u ''-''}': ..Y#r"l,.,f . l�.">A,*: b- >g<�1' - - �e`J 't ',s1:5L •ac::, tti• _ _ { , SOIL SAMPLING LOG TE START 2-26-81 SHEET..... �.......of .2........ CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. Sub-Surface Specialists, TE FINISH 'L-2?-81PROD. NO ..................... IGHT OF HAMMER 140 .'3W P. O. Box 69 LOCATION Taylor Vie= Devel, SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT - FALL .......3a' M......... ............ xwEa"su: Be Windsor. Conn. (203) 888-3857 GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS OFFSET DATE TIME DEPTH GROUND ELEVATION ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR, --Z7-81'; Ylrae 11�1~ F1168JfIIb111 4 • '' s HOLE NOS B-q 210 Main Street •: CASING SAMPLER RE BARA MPLER O.D. 2N. LD. 1 " V ... TYPE M ._.. ..B�.:L .. MII<nnhester Conn. 06040 , . q Q n TYPE OF RIG SIZE I.D. 1l..9 $�':....1....3/ M BLOWS PER 6" SAMPLE BelowSAMPLE ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE NO. TYpe _ OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS _ Surface DEPTHS Of From To CONSIST. DEPTH REMARKS NO. PEN REC. ELEV.FT. 0.6 6-12 12.18 MOISTURE ELEV. $" rd, bre silt, bricks* v. t br v.f-f nand,- tr. silt. 'to SI; 8 8 110 M.Comp game q 112 41 6'6" , 10 10 to 5S 10 11 I;.Camp Lt. br. v.f-c sand, tr. silt. ? 18 10 n wet 10 151 to SS 4 4 5 Loose Ero f-a sand. S 18 1br 6" 18; 20 4to SS 1 1 2' V.Soft Lt. gry clay, some rdo br. silt. lit. vef- 4 tit 1.6 214 6" Not rand seam, 251,to S,S i 1 2 V.Soft Lt. gry clay, lit/some rd. br. silt. K 1R 1A 26'6" wet - 0 _ 101to Sfi I I I V.Soft Lt. .gry clay# some rd. br: silt. 18 . •6" wet us , 151 to S-1,iol- It I V.Soft Lt. gry& rd. br. clay, was milt, 7 1 A lip '6" wet do 't0 SS k` 0 h 2 V.Soft Lt. .gry & rd, bare clay$ sme ailte _410 +{i1 R 6" ifRt Proportions used:true=0-10%,little= 10-20%,some a 20.35%,and=35-30% TOTAL FOOTAGE, F DRILLER: Jells SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY C c CORED W=WASHED 0-10 LOOSE Earth boring F. HELPER: J-13- SS o SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED. COMP. SOILS ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 30-30 DENSE Rode • 5/73 TP=TEST PIT 50+ VERY DENSE MOLE NO. DRILLING INSPECTOR: LIT=UNDISTURBED THINWALL tTE START 2-26-61 SOIL SAMPLING LOGr�SHEET.... of 2.CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. FINISH; Sub-Surface Specialists PRO1. NO t' WEIGHT OF HAMMER 140 :2 0 P. O. Box 69 LOCATION _ Ta 1 car remn Devel, FnLi 30'�. Wit........ SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT a►IIEJb?�Af S. Windsor Corm. (203) 888 3857 GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS OFFSET DATE TIME DEPTH .. - ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR ELEVATIONjo t GROUND !+ t» � � o*l1e�27-81 0 hra. - li .r HOLE NO. k _. - B s 210 1�83A 3tr@9t r s CASING SAMPLER CO BARR MPLER C.D. 2" I.D. 1 3 ~ - e `_ L�' 'TYPE OF RIG HYdTB>111iC Rota 1`"Anc, heater' Cie• Q�I� TYPE SIZE I.D. �... .a{] ..i... / M SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6' Depth Type ON SAMPLER DENSITY PROFILE Wow DEPOTHS of From To OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS SAMPLE Surface Sample CONSIST. DEPTH ELEV.FL 0-6 6-12 I2 18 MOISTURE ELEV. REMARKS NO. PEN RFC. Gry & rd, bra clay, sane Is12t, kb e b S3 1 i V.Soft Ed. br. clay, some gry clay layers. _ ; o t R 1 R wet 10 10 to SS t�F. 1 2 Y.Soi't Rd. bra clay, lit. clay End silt. to tR 1R eb•t wet 1 10 5 to SS W - 2 3 Y.Soft Rde bre clay, lit, silt. tt tR t� •6" wet 20 to SS 11 2 4 Y.Soft Rd. bre clay, lite grY cjaY• A R 6196" wet V.Soft Rd. br. claye 1'i 18 18 bb 6" wet r' 684 0 30 / 41 V.Denst Rd. br, vef-sand do vef-c gmv,, lit. silt. 1 18 1 set ! 6 . " Bottcn-of boring ?1'6", k 0M Installed 14'6" plus 50 slotted +screen for total length of 19160, 1?* abave 8r6de, 206" 'below � Also a lacked & vented 2 rotsee e �" protect- tive sleeve, Concrete collar am developaawt f40 Proportions used:tray-0.10%,little 10.20%,some=20-35%,and=35-50% TOTAL FOOTAGE-, DRILLER: SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY C HELPER: C c CORED W c WASHED 0 10 LOOSE Earth Boring h. SS o SPLIT SPOON 10.30 MED.COMP. f SOILS ENGINEER: ) UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON P 30-50 DENSE Rode �btg h: 5D YERY DENSE HOLE NO. DRILLING INSPECTOR a UT UNDISTURBED THINWALL ;� ^.;0t i},.:5, :+Y T —q). +'R'. -' ,: •F?R">• f.iL f^A= '_ f.y,.. .,L,•!t�l f .4+� �.g 3 _ t`°�' ek X }nj{s �•4„y, TE START y 1 `r r� p SOIL SAMPLING LOG z f—Di SHEET..... .�.......of 1.....:. CONNECTICUT TEST BORINGS, INC. TE FINISH 2-27-81 PROJ. NO. ............ ...... _ Sub-Surface Specialists MIGHT Of HAMMER 140 )30D P. O. Box 69 LOCATION TFLAcr Fenn DeYBZ. SEYMOUR, CONNECTICUT IlNEJS`STAi S. hlil1d80T FAtY ...........30" 3Sl......... . . , Conn♦ (203) 888-3857 , GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS•: OFFSET DATE TIME DEPTH ` ESPECIALLY COMPILED FOR GROUND• ELEVATION •`' + h s & 0•Nsill 1{"� -81 2 r8. - HOLE NO. puss k �.......... »N. CASING S 210 Main stl @et AMPLER' CORE BARA MPLER O.D. T. I.D.1 8 TYPEqA M=CneSter• •Cronne 066 „ tt N _ pp a TYPE Of RIG I; draul�C Rotary SIZE I.D. .» w.. ...�l.'!..». BLOWS PER 6" SAMPLE DENSITY PROFILE Depth Type ON SAMPLER SAMPLE NO. OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS Surface f DEPTHS Sample from To CONSIST. DEPTH REMARKS 4 ELEV.FT. 0-6 6-12 12-18 MOISTURE ELEV. NO. PEN REC. 1 to SS 5 H H M.COap 1` 2" drk br. silt & roots. Br. v.f-a sands • 9 moist tr. bricks. roots. " Br. & rd, a sand & slits t. ay, l t. roots, .lit. ve f�ravel. _ 5 to SS 1 _1 M.COap Grange br Jr br. v.f-c t LJad, lit• silt, tr. ' b•b" dry ' " y,f-gavel 0 ' V. It, br. vef-f s3and, tr. silt. ' 10 10 to SS 6 A i0 Comp Lt. br.. br. OzarJge v.f-vec sand. • r 1!`6" wet 1 1 to SS W 0 H V.Soft Lt. gry clay & atilt. some rd. br. silt midi 4 IF tP 100b" wet clay. ' 20 20 to SS w0f, 1 i' V.Soft lots gry rde Ire ;" Clay varves, lit. rd. K t 2i b" wet br. silt. 2- to SS W; 1 1 2 V.soft Lte gry & rde br. clay varved with clayey F 1R 26 tz" wet silt to thick. 0 30 to SS 1 1 1 V.Soft Ed. br. clay, same Milt varsrcd with gry clay 31`6" wet 06" 'it._Ieilte 4 W Batt= of boring %•6% SAM NOTE: Installed 10.6" plus 59 screen (total 1306140 13• below grade• 2.6" !0 above ;grade. Also installed proteo- tive sleevep vented] locked and — nwagered Concreted Collar. Proportions used:trace=0-10%,little= 10-20%,some=10.35%,and=33-SO% i —i TOTAL FOOTAGE: DRILLER: J.D. SAMPLE TYPE COHESIONLESS DENSITY ►� Earth booing Ft. HELPER: JB C=CORED W=WASHED 0-10 LOOSE SS=SPLIT SPOON 10-30 MED.COMP: Rode Corby -,ft. SOILS ENGINEER: UP=UNDISTURBED PISTON 3030 DENSE TP=TEST PIT ; 50} VERY DENSE HOLE NO. DRILLING INSPECTOR: r -: UT=UNDISTURBED THINWALL 41 5 ' APPENDIX B ' GEOLOGIC PROFILES GEOLOGIC PROFILES ' TAYLOR - FENN SOUTH W I NDSO R , CT. B-I B-2 ELEV. 35.0' ELEV�36.5� ;.:$•;. •: OK. BROWN SILT LOAM 35.5 •• •• DARK BROWN SILT LOAM 32 GRADING TO YELLOW BR. - - C- V.F. SAND - RED/BROWN-GRAY VARVED ' RED/BROWN-GRAY == SILT AND CLAY VARVED SILT 8 CLAY 22 v v v v RED BROWN SANDY AND 19 v v v v RED BROWN SILTY COMPACT TILL 175 v v v v SILTY COMPACT TILL v v vv WITH SOME C-V.F. SAND AND ' REFUSAL 15,2 REFUSAL GRAVE. ' B-3 B-4 ELEV.41.0' ELEV.40Q DK.BROWN SILT LOAM •_�';�'•'•'•_:' GRADING TO GRAY V.F. - BROWN-GRAY SILT WITH SOME 36 . '' ` SAND 8 THEN GRADING CLAY GRADING TO RED BROWN/ --- TO YELLOW TAN V.F.SAN0 - GRAY VARVED SILTAND CLAY -- RED BROWN/GRAY - VARVED SILT 8 CLAY 19.5 BOTTOM OF 185 BOTTOM OF BORING BORING I ' B-5 B-6 ELEV.40.0' ELEV.53.0'DARK BROWN SILTY CLAY LOAM -- BROWN-GRAY SILT WITH 52 -- SOME CLAY GRADING TO - ' = VAR V ED SI LT AN AY VARVED SILT AND CLAY - RED BROWN /GRAY VARVED SILT AND CLAY 1 18.5 BOTTOM OF -- BOR I N G - 21.5 BOTTOMOF ' BORI NG ' GEOLOGIC PROFILES TAYLOR FEN N ' SOUTH WINDSOR , CT. B-7 B-8 ELEV.64.5' ELEV. 63.5 •� _. DARK BROWN SILT LOAM ;..`::. • YELLOW BROWN MED-V.F. SAND GRADING TO YELLOW GRADING TO ORANGE BROWN BROWN AND TAN MED.- 53 !,,.r MED.-V.F. SAND ' S1 5 • -_; V.F. SAND -- RED BROWN/GRAY VARVED - RED BROWN/GRAY VARVED - SILT AND CLAY _ - SILT AND CLAY ' 33 32 BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF BORING BORING ' B-9 B-10 ELEV. 65.0 ELEV. 63.0' DARK BROWN SILT LOAM . . . "- DARK BROWN SILT LOAM GRADING • GRADINGTO TAN FRIABLE `• .:'• TO FRIBLE ORANGE AND TAN MED. V.F. -F SAND GRADING �,'� �'• V.F. SAND 5050- TO TAN MED.-V.F. SAND ' :•.•• � ' RED-BROWN/GRAY VARVED SILT AND CLAY = 31.5 RED-BROWN/GRAY BOTTOM OF - - VARVED SILT AND BORING CLAY -3 v vv v v RED-BROWN SAND AND -6.5 v v v SILTY COMPACT TILL REFUSAL APPENDIX C ' CASTING SAND LEACHATE TESTS ' 1'ATB ,Op .CONNUCTIC; U i r DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ' .• ` � STATE OFFICE BUILDING IIAA I-FORD.CONNECTICUT 0611S October 20, 1980 Mr. H.W. Congdon ' Superintendent of Sanitation ►:_;•: East Hartford Town Sanitary Division': " = 121 Ecology Road East Hartford, Connecticut 05108 .11 , - dear .Ar. Congdon: '~--r' .• „,.- - -- ,� F_{--�, �_.f. ,;..,, �,__... . .. - Cy This letter is- o authorize'At 'use of 'castin• i sand Taylor b Fenn Com� 9 generated� frofi the Ta ' Y patty. Windsor., as daily"cover- material at the East Hartford landfill. This material may not be :used �n _any side••slopes where •": . it will bt subject to erosion, _ �- 'T. •,� �' `.:, z: ' Our department has determined -that this material fs not a hardQus ' waste. t •��... • ; ; ,.:...rt , ? ai�::;.� _ .. The Solid Waste Management Unit of the Department of Envi ronmentai.•a' Protection has determined that..thin material- is suitable for use -as daily ' cover. However, i,f a dust- problem As.credted by. this practice, use of the casting sand as deily cover•.mu4�t be qtoped �' r� " � ' This approval is• based- n-a1�1tualAnspe�0.gn by�this Unit, 'ConsultaT tion with the Solid Waste ManagemenV Unit,! an$ .cIhgmical analyses by the State of Connecticut Health.Department -and-•Keni-m.Ioviroiwrital •Services:. . :- .�..,� •r. a�',�•.,-:. .I+ ..�:- �1., •'' - -.. -i. -.. Should you have any iwes�Jops, pleas6�'lreai ,free ' .contact Barry L' Giroux at 566-4869 = � •" V . Stephsn it cock t 1. , ..;. ,.. Di rector Rua rdousF,Materials Management Unit; ; 4 SWH:BLG:et ,f `; •. ,frr : 3 s cc: D. Albino - Taylor A Fenn Cdo ' C. Kurker - Solid Waste Mngt. Unit: •• 1 , 4. Ail RAI #IVL.� COAECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEAL PHONE 666-6"6 LABORATORY DIVISION 23 IJ 4U 4N 8� 10 CLINTON STREET 1 E P.O. BOX 1689, HART'FORD, CONN. 06101 SAMPLE INVOICE SAMPLES OF SEWAGE OR TRADE WASTE To be filled in by person collecting samples / 1 From HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ElANAGEMEll &Kffof Sample of sewage ( ). trade waste (Y), sludge ( ), or 1 Name of treatment plant Owned by RECEIVED 1 Plant processes or treatment /A110 : , 1HAZnr Collected by ' On Pd,4iZAG VJ'T UNIT 1 (Name) (Title) - Report to f, l l �� , r c 1 is). r_Shipped on j Composite 1 Laboratory Collector's Collected I Yes or l Min. i Time of Number Number Sample of �_ from No I Apart Collection tg 1 - 1 I ' 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 No. and Kind Df Bottles ► 1';, �, ,f < , / , ! A6 * ) ( Jobe J. ItedJs j 11 f( 4:� r�C 14 jr J, /� N•,S '1. : /J_ . ,, s 'vI' .-- j.. NI!T/_ j t�"�'J•y , rO .��`: '3s M•cr;�••G� .ti nr� �G�: Lip�'h'. L ;/�f r'�•�- tE's 7� 1 SPECIAL EXAMINATIONS] T- P.O. Box 1689, Hartford, Conn. D61 1 - e-t ,e -e ' Caber 0&&r PH 22'c►tit't c.. ' Total Solids i p 170 Zo• $0 Fixed Volatile — Alkalinity as CaC0 ' Ghlorides as C1 �� C3 ,:'�ylj'.L•" y, ,c Cis �b U .0b Cyanide ' Detergent as ABS F7.1oride as F Grease Aluminum as Al 1 0�t 2 g• l Z • - V/ Arsenic as As 5 G 6 - 6 3 8 O. C7 ' V Cadmium as 'Cd Q 0,000 0, 006 Chromium as Cr B 1 0-V L1 , r r ' Co per as Cu (SOOT - 0• Id ✓ Iron as Fe 2,3 0 ! ' V Lean as pb .�i O ©� 0 0 0 D• 1 Do Mercury as Hg Nickel as Ni .3• 0100 0 - 0 Silver as Ag Q ' Tin as Sn iV Zinc as Zn 8', 0.9 C; , t Armnonia .N Nitrate .N Nitrite .N ' Organic .N ` C.O.D. IV pr .0. jz1 Phenol 630 0 • 040 I ' 7YbCa Y dns 'c P r e I II -� - 310 , — J Sulfate as SO4 JC Lt . 9S 1 Ll 0 . � G. 6 D U 0 ^•�r� — S. ice:fir, F P/�rim h. �S S,o Q•tFLrO Q+ 0'� O; CZ"0 Director,. CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1'11011t' SGG_2G3a LABORATORY DIVISION 10 Clinton Street P.O. Box 1689, Hartford, Conn. 06101 REPORT OF LABORATORY EXAMINATION Reported Specimen No. O I S Collector's No. Town of Report of Examination of ' For Source Collected by Collected on hr. M. Ree'd. hr. 1I l;eason for Examination The examination gives the f(Alowinc results: HYDROCARBONS: Extracted & Programmed Temp 3 7o °C be-.VS, Colunn Ch romatograph S, d �x'}r2c"f' p. a Range Ape)r. 5 d N=pe -7 N Se nu1 — Configuration r+ve Nunn-r of Components I CQ ! Identification I Q; J L' Ref. :standard Conclusion: O CJ LW4NtL1ICU1 51P;TE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ' Phone 56G-2536 LAPORATOR1 10 Clinton Sts _P.O. B-;x 1689, Hartford, Conn. 06101 � r LABORATORY N&BER: -Q, C- _ HYDROCARBONS: Vapor Test �. Temp. C °C i olumn Temp. l,2 2c.�a� � v;�,,t,•+��_ � � � � U °C �i� •;St Co11m1n 11 ` Results expressed as Microgram per Liter: Component Concentratio Component Concentr: mac- METHYL ACETATE l/ Methane Butane METHYL ALCOHOL Propane 14ETHYL CELLOSOLVE 14ETHYL iso-BUTYL KETONE ACETONE WgML ETHYL KETONE AMTL ACETATE METHYL METHACRYLATE ' AMYL ALCOHOL METHYLENE CHLORIDE iso-AMYL ALCOHOL NONANE BENZENE (� �`' � iso-OCTANE ' BUTYL ACETATE PENTANE BUTYL ALCOHOL PETROLEUM ETHER iso-BUTYL ACETATE PROPYL ACETATE iso-BUI7L ALCOHOL iso-PROPYL ACETATE swBUTYL ALCOHOL iso-PROPYL ALCOHOL ' CARBON TETRACHLORIDE iso-PROPYL ETHER CHLOROBENZENE 1,1,2,2,-TE:'P.ACHLC::OETHANE ' CHLOROBUTANE TETRACHLOROPTHYLENE CHLOROFORM LIJENE DICHLOROBENZENE 1,1,1-TRIC111.0ROETHANE ' 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,1,2-TRICR10ROETHANE - TRICHLOROETRYLENE, ETHYL ACETATE VI ETHYL ALCOHOL VINYL ACETATE ETHYL BENZENE XYLENE (META XYIENE (ORTHO) ETHYL ETHER ETHYLENE CHLORIDE XYLENE PARA Jesse S. Tucker, Director m Kem Ron ' Kemron Environmental Services 3570 North Avondale Avenwe Chicago.Illinois 60616 Telephone(312)588.8500 ' Laboratory No. 050680-3A CLIENT: Aare Resin Corporation of Forest Park, Illinois. ' SAMPLE: One Taylor-Fenn sample submitted by client, received 5/6/80. ' RESULTS Date -A- Anal s Parameter Reclaim Sand Analyzed Phenol Pg/� 0.83 5/8/80 LL pH* 6.97 5/7/80 LB Cadmium <0.01 5/13/80 LL ' Ug/ml ad ' Nickel <0.05 5/13/80 IB Ug/ml Ni Lead <0.05 5/13/80 18 ug/ml Pb Arsenic <4.5 5/15/80 LB ug/1 As Chromium <0.03 5/13/80 IS ug/a Cr Copper <0.01 5/12/80 Ls Ug/ml Cu Zinc 0.02 5/12/80 LB ug/rnl Zn *METHOD: Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 243 - Monday, Deoember 18, 1978. * pH taken after suspension of 100 cans. of sample in 1600 nil. ' Water and stirred for 15 minutes. June 20, 1980 KDRU1 Environmental Services &-lla444�a(�� ' Lawrerioe Iaruk�n Page 1 of 2 Iab Supervisor coo Borg Warner Corporation AdmlNstrottvr.CMk*t M oneno.Otm 235 Second Shen(614)374-2222 t+p 45750 Loboro"Locamonr ' DATON ROUGE.LOURIANA CHICAGO 1LUN015 FAPAVNGTON HIU5 MICINWN MARIETTA OHIO POUT NECHES.TEXAS 16550 Hg��+!��?!!++��Rood 3570 Norm Avondole Avenue 32740 Nonhwesiern Hghwoy 235 Second Street 1216 Porn Neches Avenue (504)29�'ooau Zip 70606 (312)58"500 Zip 60618 (313)626-2426 Zip 46018 (614)374.2222 bp 45750. (713)727.1661 Lp 77651 r Kem Ron Kemron Environmental Services 3570 North Avondole Avenue Chicogo,Illinois 60618 Telephone(312)588.8500 Laboratory No. 050680-3A continued CLIENT: Anne Resin Corporation of kbrest Park, Illinois. ' SAMPLE: One Taylor-Fenn sarrple.submitted client, received 5 6 80. by / / RESULTS: Date ' A Analyst/ Parameter Reclaim Sand Analyzed ' Barium 0.1 5/29/80 LL/LB ug/m- Ea Selenium <4.7 5/28/80 T L/LB ' ug/l Se Silver <0.01 5/29/80 LL/IB ug/ffa Ag ' Page 2 of 2 cao Borg Warner Cormotion - AdrNNshollve OMce,Monetq.Otero 235 Second Sneer(614)374.2222 Zip 45750 Lobaotory location: BATON ROUGE LOUFAANA CHICAGO ILUNOIS FARMINGTON KLLS MICHIGAN MART M OHIO PORT NECHES.TEXAS 16550 Hgntond Rooms 7 3570 Nonh Avordole Avenue 32740 Nonhwesrern NVhvmy 235 Second Sheet 1216 Port Neches Avenue ram)2' 8030 (312)5Q8.8500 Zip 60616 (313)626.2426 dip 48018 (614)374.2222 Zip 45750. (713)727.1661 bp 77651 } C1 2 0 CD W O_ a m Q m 1 ' BIBLIOGRAPHY ' Handman, Elinor H. and Roger B. Colton, 1973. Depth to Bedrock, Manchester Quadrangle, Connecticut: U.S. Geological Survey ' Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-452B. Langer, William H. , 1973. Map Showing Thickness of Principal Clay Unit, ' Manchester Quadrangle, Connecticut: U.S. G.S. Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-452D. ' Langer, William H. , 1973. Map Showing Thickness of Material Overlying Principal Clay Unit, Manchester Quadrangle, Connecticut: U.S. G.S. Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-452E. ' Ryder, Robert B. 1972. Contour Map of the Bedrock Surface Manchester ' Quadrangle, Connecticut: U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-452A ' Ryder, Robert B. , 1973. Availability of Groundwater, Manchester Quad- rangle, Connecticut: U.S. G.S. Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-452C. Ryder, Robert B. and L.A. Weiss, 1971 . Hydrogeologic Detail for the Upper Connecticut River Basin, Connecticut, U.S.G.S. , Connecticut ' Water Resources Bulletin No. 25. Soil Survey Staff, 1958. Soil Survey Hartford County, Connecticut, Soil ' Conservation Service, No. 14, 126 pages.