Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Site Plan - Conservation (258)
t I TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR V Y U INLAND WETLAND, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION APPLICATION APPLICATION #. h �- Cy �" DATE RECEIVED /Q—�.3 - ZONE /' INSTRUCTIONS 1. The application, map and plans must be submitted in triplicate, together with the fee set forth in the Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Regulations, Town of South Windsor. (See Regulations, Section VI) . 2. The South Windsor Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Regulations should be reviewed with respect to the standards and criteria for application evaluation. (See Regulations, Sections VIII - X) . 3. The applicant understands that this application is to be considered complete only when all information and documents required by the Agency have been submitted. (See Regulations Section VII). Also complete state filing form. A. APPLICANT'S NAME Capuano Builders and Developers (Mr. Paul Capuano) ADDRESS 1208 Cromwell Avenue Rocky Hill, CT 06067 PHONE: (HOME) (WORK) 721-8220 B. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Same ADDRESS PHONE: (HOME) (WORK) (List additional owners, addresses, and phone numbers on back of application) . C. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, A LETTER BY THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) AUTHORIZING THE PROPOSED REGULATED ACTIVITY SET FORTH IN THE APPLICATION MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM AND WILL BE PART OF THE APPLICATION. D. PROJECT NAME: (if any) Governors Square Business Center (Buildings E,F,G&H) 1. Contact Person (if further information is needed) . Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. 1170 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 (203) 291-8755 E. THE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY WHICH IS TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED REGULATED ACTIVITIES INCLUDING A DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ALLOW IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY ON THE INLAND WETLAND AND WATERCOURSES MAP. A 76 . 7 acre site, IP zoned. Property is south of Governors Highway and east of Nutmeg Road South. See attached A-2 Survey. PAGE 1 F.'NAMES OF ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (USE SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY) See attached shept G. HAVE YOU NOTIFIED ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS BY CERTIFIED LETTER THAT AN APPLICATION IS PENDING BEFORE THE AGENCY?. Yes **(You are required to supply a copy of the letter with the list of the names of the abutters) .** H. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL PROPOSED REGULATED ACTIVITY(S) INCLUDING AMOUNT AND TYPES OF FILL AND THE TIME ELEMENT INVOLVED: Construction of new industrial buildings and extention of Px; st; ng Swale system. 350± extention of Capitol Ave. Fill material in regulated buffer area only, no fill in wetland. Work to commence after approval, approximately 2 years to complete. I. A CLASS A-2 MAP OF THE PROPERTY DRAWN TO 1"-401 , SHOWING THE AREA TO BE DEVELOPED, EXTENT OF THE WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES AFFECTED, TOPOGRAPH, EXISTING AND PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ANt NAMES AND LOCATIONS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS MUST BE SUBMITTED. J. ACREAGE OF WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES TO BE ALTERED: None K. ACREAGE OF WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES TO BE CREATED:- L. LINEAL FEET OF PROPOSED STREAM ALTERATION M. TOTAL LAND AREA 0�+ PROJECT AND PERCENTAGE WHICH IS WETLANDS: 76 . 7 acre parcel of which 23 5- acres are wetlands approximately 30 .5 -- I N. IDENTIFY ALL OTHER PERMITS OR APPROVALS THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED, APPLIED FOR, OR REQUIRED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION. (These may include but not be limited to, local Planning i Zoning, Zoning Board of Appeals, D.E.F. , F.E.H.A. D.O.T. , The Army Corps of Engineers, and any other State, Local or Federal Permits.) Planning and Zoning 10/23/89 0. THE APPLICANT (OR'DESIGNATED RZPRESENTATFEd, HEREBY ATTESTS THAT A SIGN WILL BE P9STED A. TH& FOLLOWING LOCATIONS Nutmeg Roa outh, and at Governors Hi hwa ,� as irected by Town staff by Capuano Bui ers & Developers NAME Paul Capuano ON OR BEFORE T OLL 2jf SIGNATURE: THESE SIGNS MUST BE DISPLAYED CONTINUOUSLY FOR AT LEAST FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO SCHEDULED MEETING. (See Regulations, Section 6.3a) . PAGE 2 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR THE REGULATED ACTIVITIES LISTED IN PARAGRAPH H ABOVE, FOR A INLAND WETLAND, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND CONFIRMS THAT: 1. HE IS FAMILIAR WITH THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE INLAND WETLAND, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR. 2. HE/SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT AT ANY TIME DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, THE AGENCY MAY REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WETLANDS AND/OR WATERCOURSES IN QUESTION AND/OR ANY PROPOSED- ACTIVITY. 3. ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW SHALL BE CONSIDERED FACTUAL, OR IN THE CASE OF ANTICIPATED ACTIVITY, BINDING. A KNOWING FAILURE OF THE APPLICANT OR ANY OF HIS/HER AGENTS TO PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION, OR PERFORMANCE EXCEEDING THE LEVELS OF ACTIVITY ANTICIPATED, SHALL BE SUFFICIENT GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION OF ANY PERMIT UNDER THESE REGULATIONS . 4. BY MAKING THIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT GIVES PERMISSION TO THE INLAND WETLAND, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS AND/OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE TO ENTER THE PORTIONS OF THE PREMISES WHICH ARE SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATION AND OTHERWISE EVALUATING THE MERITS OF THE APPLICATION BOTH BEFORE AFTER A FINAL DECISION HAS BEEN ISSUED. OL _iJi - - I Signat re o Applicant Date Received and filed at the office of the Planning Department this day of 19 Signature of Agent Date FEE RECEIVED YES_ NO_ AMOUNT DATE RECEIVED by OCT 23 1989 HEARING DATE HEARING ADV. (1) (2) South Windsor PERMIT GRANTED DATE PERMIT DENIED DATE INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 3 Hrk °fIeh"ltear f(:olly + Itute Cloypit (IferfnrP +ete STTR G- to r` J� t f •fit ( `` f) �e• • �.�-mil' � • . �. B � a• - /I AlfF •�• ltf t/}1 i�. 11 \'O, ----t^ •�'� � 1 -✓ ` lit j5r,►t 1( `'� - '• ~� :�:,•Fla 1rtt+l�1 � �� ��' .;�/�%��. :�:• 'g � •• •��,• �� c ;�� +ate. ot'• az /I• •�Z�- = ° SITE LC ` SCALE 1" _ � " 4 �' �, _dt .___ PRUP•USEC WA lf_R MAIN AND HYDRANT L X C EXISTING SP('T GRADE mSMH 1 300 EXISTING C?NT- 1R ANF, ELEVATION PROPC EC C-NTUUR AND ELE'VAT10N ANTI TRACKING APRON EXISTING !ITILITY POLE ; r , ��./. PROPOSED LIGHT �?'P'_i 8 Q G EXISTIN', 1 r1T r.l % Uo�� �_ LIWTS F I „<,- 1: 'NETLAN(i:S SILT FENCE �4s F c PCB.9 Q y , roc lion PRQF" EL :MH 4 1_ _ _ - - - - = s- \ „'rt'; harrior at top nf. slope at f1 AREL' NE' I1 1.l'0 r �- �� r��,,,, 1 I� i •1 ,.klnrl item e At J. stlrrnund stockpilerr,n 4 t 1.. 41:,Ict I:walr -Iti-11 and terrq,orary haul 1p ' r �necl n,,. _ IIt foxry a o t top of slope f swale,. n I e LI _ ._J_- _ r an I - ew,a I" It 1>e,t Cons shown nu pl u,. ( •r ru.t sans tary sr•w.r water main atd gat: 76y5.8 �' t I n in rtrer't ext rntion, rough rracle 7 uct site sanitary and drainage, rough 1 J'k it.o. L/ Cn<, X 7'.r � 8 � I outlr>t f2ntc•rt.l.m for storm sewers. 2 ¢2�_.__.. rEMF'il` r .._l _; ' I , Iuil il, L f,nnrintir,n finish strnrt 1 N 9 r 1 �• \ I uEi l irs ,lF lr L,sn c•,urse to street. n I R J' '..L LF ,4 In i..1 Luil 11 n.J 'it.L I itres, ronstrtict- hui Ldiul I NARY U , 1 7, IS nrrr and Linder to sit+ plyl;in•3 and .✓ A 1 I SEE DETAIL rr,r,a I}, rr mu.,:, •ult l-tracl••iny aprnn and tempor'aty ° c7 - ri1, , ,1, Iwtrns, 12. 1'ul•v,-il an,l „eel Inwn arras, establish Iandsnni,r• i 1 I 1•I:Int inq. i l 1 13. When grace.is ref 110 ir;lwd and site stahi l.i ze,l, _ sill Lnrr ir•t r41 hn rnT nvoa. - , v Cu f, 3O' a;ep P E3 it �•.-`� s%nr;ro' ¢>pp��e 75,q s 75.6 rhtnLWlnlION Atli' F.r,u<;inn rrltnranl rJlI1F.3: '� , �.O r, I ell n,.,�i,n n•:t. ,I nq -. welt t,n ...... r, Ir•1 , r� .,• nr ..,IIh 11•n 'fir_„irinl in. t „r1 r,r>sinn „•1 1,11 ' rn,•1:„I' 1 , 0•''° ♦•-'r.d 1� rl•. rr..,::r, ri err r.: „ i1 ,:, i1 anll Wnt r., In,:-,•1, ..,r,rn . '. I„I•,In al:n�, r t t, te1 tigt,t 1, s•,:1 f 1 ,.••1 e.f rl,•,I •U 14 , rl,,r., ,si„rl lo-, t ,ndn,: e.fnl r 1 ,I• . Nf' °O \; n al.r,t •rel,•,•1 �c)° , / , 'M1• 'r,:, ,.,•J•�: ,•.�Je,vorrr,imi- /nr,.,lmplRmon nn e tatt r ai t sed imr..,l ,•,nn •r11r coot,nl mrasu,rs shown on tl eq plane.. This • / , r.e,l••�.• ,r,I Pity inr lndos imn lomentatinn as well a 'nt nny r+.,q,•;r.,l 1,,angev to this Plan must be apP,oTrrlmhy tr,n / \\�� a ,nJinenr .bnlrm the p,pper for al town agerry• ^N `' OUTLET PROTECTION(T anti k,arl inq ape ors to he Lnsner led oqula, ly to in:mc p.r•pr (SEE DE AIL) rry,o at inn. Stone to be adgnd to or rep l.fr rd x• vrp,i,ed, .a„d 1e 11ooaible to R111"11 n.I•.1 i„n,,r I e•rto i r�w1. I TEMP RIP RAP BERM\ RbFQ';Et r'. rfimn„''till' I:n.,t,nt V. 7 5 mr:, •n_, ,i I 1 t.n n,l TOP OF BERM ELE LARED END L n. pr in rin ate rn.ti whr:r pr i41n mn, t,nn 1": :t.,, •:1„1I r,r },n.,I•-,1 „11, \ ^b r n , ,I. ,n,l u:nrl rl:il, mnl•h ry ccnded with v 1•',1 i,nl q:.v1i••1 .,•••I .,hilivgl in., fn to . , n, r.,Pl,f i••,•nl r.•.:i.,�, rv,t:nl mr n,n,n, -.hall I,n i:,'.1`,Ill r•1 ,Im i,rl \ r ..ir r, t,n1 i r d,•n•::,.H nor ,I, n. r r1n, p the hi,rr In r•• 1 „l i ., nr 1•nhi it tan,La 0r.r `,\rr I• r�:,elf,,1itr„I.r1,I ::"r• Inrl, nl I. r Ivan rAtr 2. TFMP('FAKl` ',I!L I-IF -TAII� awl r, rI I-n lan,ln-j- I's ...t I 13. WlI,;;t 'Iran:: 1.1 a1,1 i r1i-I I n,l !'t 7,11, 6 ma Y oln-0,I 7 '01!!sivir 01 0 X16.8 PC13 11 75.6 1,1111 its 111 lt)N d •E '13 14 r All srdi— l.t'l.—tatic... 11 ty I,,, 1-1�1 "t---. 'A"O,A"q" to this plan .,I,t bI, ,pp,""d fly tf- tf- 1-on- 10C.1 to." ag""v. • I.....I to I, t q.., ly to i na,n r tar Pr (X)TLET P14OTECTION(T ,lio". Stour t� he -Vjed to 0, (SEE DEYAIL) ill t., to 1. F,I-; TEMP RIP RAP BERMRCrF(riE V, i In ....I..... I-- I U f-TOP OF BERM ELEV. 7�,5 LARED IFNII� W i f7 I) I I f i i-I Poo I f j IIr t -p,i drat of I ,w r....... ru/ 1" 0 R (vply I 1-l""I 1 . ......... W-od 1 1,is-, r?()() Pounds r- I ff, I v pou-l-, f", hay mn 11cf, at P In- 17- At:,r. (203) 29 1-8755 PROJECT DRAWING TITLE SHEET ♦ GOVERNORS SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7 n r.'- SQUARE dRA WN RK 1A vr�,,.- .156-142 0 N ,'4.,1 f. P IN ^J 1 N_C k -IING EAASTING._ 74 '5N. _ 18_8963 42 i- ...2. .... . ...«. 1/4496_27 _ 1891. 5.2E_.. / 3 1 46c 2?_ 189193 F7 / 4 _ . .174 8102 1$916689 _ S _.. _' 4 z/N 23 189775 31 +iS_.48_ 189t?22 43 189 5/ _...I OPERTY LINE \/ / IRON PIN TC HE SET / /� /i ; • EXISTING IR^N PIN u MONUMENT TL BE '.:,FT ■ EXISTING MC"Jy1MENT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND PIPE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN AND PIPE PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE AND PIPE �♦ / �/ --�-- PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE AND PIPE ` ¢ EXISTING WATER MAIN AND HYDRANT v 4 5 0 / !, ___ ._._._ PROPOSED WATER MAIN AND HYDRANT .4 . .••• •. " x 70 EXISTING SPOT GRADE r sar 6 ,�SMH 1 —30U-- EXISTING CONTOUR AND ELEVATION J` [360 PROPOSE[ CONTOUR AND ELEVATION / ,off o / ANTI - TRACKING APRON! EXISTING UTILITY POLE -Z Q; ' PROPOSED LIGHT �JPCEI 8 G EXISTING LI..HT 75.1 / ,/ n U' s..A_ LIMITS OF INLAND WETLANDS SILT FENCE S4\ ']7 I.......... t ne.r ruction ! "'� I. rl. lii nt barrier at top of slope at O \ PC6' 9 O PROF EU SMH 4 �--'•�.— f l 2 In b I I trackiny apron. %, n L�`J'I\l � A place in Stockp7lc at location FLARED ND FL=7S.00ritr7iny J. Surround stockpile ' '..:a.t.h •vArmnnt barrier. 4. Cons,r uct swale rrtention an<I temporary haul road ssinq. ' .,• rp I , e. Ir1. r!1 silt fence It top of slope of swalc+, and c ros; ,wale at locations shown on plan. .. n - ! - l.- , - f,, r•�.. r cur.t ^,aru P.ary sewer, water main and gar o �X ?6.7�,"` - Ft=70.50 27' — SFE L7E'A(_- Y, 7 F rN a C I ' 76 - - - - - - - - PCB 10 , w CD , X16.8 r 1 7y PCB 11 ♦," �• 75.9 ` 75.6 "'� F hlntlnAIION AND rI' /R I 77 P(,Fj 13 n,,n,l•-- - �.I,PR PoSEr) 6 B 14 FLA,0 FpJr, - \\ J Anpr A. Andrm OUTLET PROTECTION(T (SEE DE'AIL) a\ npAr ,t im+. Sr• � n,rr nr tr+ wi 1' TEMP RIP RAP BERM RbF(.);�, ^•1• r+Art. \ r• F:n-inn and sr' TOP OF BERM ELEV.=73� LARED rFN[) nr i•+, to rnn-e. B`L TYF.) - I� \ �b r - ,t: i I r is+nr •a �.. 11040 ` „•, •n,,..t,,, .' ROSE ^ _ r'Hirrtl is htalvle NG �;� , /� •,�I n11 .1,ter.,,,hr,t .,,An 32r-24"RCP i t,lirt= ,I,,�IiAr1 W/2.OrMIN. COVER CRUS • )� ^r I,nr„ ,,,.,r O ' r ' r , I•A a^nrlr f n t n,v,i r.. 6° 2�STONE TO BE cTO�RNE o OF CT M T.PLACED OVER FILTER FABRIC pp'0 r r 7 pnn nrl, 1:rr 2p MATERIAL 1'ft :rS'�F(. - Al �� 1•Arm:mpnt Vpr]ot.,tir 0 rl ARE::', Fplf, ' J/ SEE SEDIMENT AND EROSION SHEET FOR PAVEMENT WIDTHS / [ r ^:r;r,a da t A,: n,n 0 , � 1I,n 1nl lnui nq STREET EDGE OF PAVEMENT 7 / , 1,11111Y I ,m-d ,,rr NG APRON DETAIL nnnnnl ,,rqr.,aa In nhply 1 pmn,rt (,pr I,ay mnlr't+ at 2 Inr,• GRAPHIC SCALE s0 0 70 0MMt'0 ; (203) 291—8755 PROJECT 11 FST ; MIMMMUMOM _ - e s i g n GOVERNORS SEDI M► ' 'n•h - " ft. 9ofessionals, inc. SQUARE EROSION DRAWN BY.• r/. -MH z �- U7 r i •� X 70 SMH 1 ANTI TRACKING APRON y� X 7 .6 1!/ 5 a i i . oxFOs - - - - -77 7 pr`b 9 /O I � " 75 ; PRQC' ED SMH _ \ . P 1 . o. F,,MH 1 X 77.7 .l 77. - PRIJ)SED l FD EN Ci I I j 2'.._ I .�---TEMP(!RARY G.1L--DE-:>A:;. r X I6.;, �. ,G.SO ` y 27' __ R. SFE DETAI'•- 76 10 v, \ to `� . X16.8 5d 74� 75.9 75.6 P U tnt N tnIIUN nr, t• '�(J'1 k ' . I All - •.=i. co F FN JN h � r FLARED FIND CV0 t � ". cT \ nngi Herr m OUTLET PH'OTECTION(T , , nr,t, tr art n' (SEE DE'CAIL) F•h" C' � �. -' : rrrprir.•d. TEMP RIP RAP BERM\ RbF OSEt r'• F'""'"" *"' TOP OF BERM ELEV.=73,\5 LARED'FNI) m for to ,o i r-ri „ I � ' - ROq� ram. ♦�; � - - `, ' ad;,,q Scnrrlrl r..14 , �._ it / / , . 4.4,j j 2�1 L_ G / F ' ' r � PLACE SILT FENCE LO OFF PROPERTY LINE r Ul 14 �� / /' • r ♦ �75.2 44 X 74.E 1 �6 ♦ 4 c 6 P3MH 2 U�� l• —. ..._._ / _ ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Y �� l X 70 J C 1� j6 m , 6 SMH 1 —300--- � �` eJ p PCd ANTI - TRACKING APRON 75.1 7 7F X 74,6 / 6 a ! , Ox�O - - -77 PCB 9 ' 0 __ �G..'?. T 75 a PRQP ED MH �- - - '- - - b SC Al— �\� FLARED ND o 4 , _ DON FL=71.00 X 75.3 . . I`�R E C 2 ID r•,,; , F.. i•I_M, �F;. IN AKEA A TMENT 1f 7r 0 �� .. //7 .. J'-STRAW BALE OP OF TE AP. RBI 1, EXCAVATE A 7REM04 4' - -r ;' T DEED AND 1ME WIDTH OF A �1 1 2. PLACE AND STAKE STRAW -.. '/ STRAW BALE. BALES.TWO STARS PER BALE :. .:. I d. 3 6 _— --MDINO WIRE OR TUNE t- (. ; ^� a STAKE FLAREII EN i G • L Fu...'LX 41 h �-PAGXED STRAW r t AF;E� FNt' o � PLAN WEWCOMPACTED BACKFU 4 {.BAIXFILI.AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOf AS 3 WEDGE 1005E STRAW SHOWN ON THE UPHILL SIDE BEn1EEN BALES TO CREI.TE 11 1 \\� I I 1 OF THE BARRIER TO PRE- ,` a / A CON-twous BA1tRIFR. VENT PIPwC ,1 J ♦, 74 ,41141,t'AP.Klrl�! SPA II�'r1111�1111114111111111 II�i1111i1T1111�PIhI�Igl1 �♦ 11Ir1111lIrII IIirIN111�11� j2 CO fixwnhG... BOTTOM OF - $ DRAINAGE WAY= � � � N Q Jr PLAN VIEW B `l _ A B 41` lllllllll/Ill�l�l/l, , t i Li ,111111111111� 1N11 11 1 ''1I tNOTE U U J u J u ELEVATION AT POINT A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN ELEVATION AT POINT B. j CROSS SEC'n0N BALED HAY OR STRAW INSTALLATION not tc $role 3. Attach inter fabric to 4. Bockfil the trench I, 1, Set posts and 2 Staple the wire the wire fencing and extend and compact the mesh fencing it into the trench. excavated soil. excavate a 6"x6' the end of 'tie post. upsiope from Posts. Filter 1 � gIs poets Wire 1 Fabric —looe - POST Fencinq,'�I r ' 1 On r � pkw 74. _ I EX'�TIN; 71,Rb r h 1 yt REM". M� AREA C " rf N_N A h N T r: ;r � r u pq F q' 6'q Sri n 746 / is ^/MF."✓,* ' - FM�1" '.=fib_ �" - E 1 I v 74. 74.8 n ' r i " HF REM'.VF[ IN AREA )f EW PAVFM€NT N/F Abutting Property Owners of Governors Square Business Center Application #89-39P 1. Hill, Robert M. & Judy Ann 16 . Philip, Henry S. & Virginia 39 Barbara Road 74 Edgewood Drive 2 . Luria, Solomon & Edward & Elise 17 . Senger, Victor I . Jr. , & 10 Barbara Road Marilyn M. 3 . Pfav, Daviel J. & Mary Ellen 66 Edgewood Drive 155 Judy Lane 18 . Franklin Distributors, Inc. 4 . Guerra, Arturo & Wolf, Helmar 140 Nutmeg Road South 165 Judy Lane 19 . H.J.M. Realty Company 45 Connecticut Avenue 5 . Marryat,Allan F. & Janice E. 175 Judy Lane 20 . Ryan Business Systems, Inc 6 . Lapenta, Barbara 455 Governors Highway 168 Edgewood Drive 21. Capital Steel of Hartford 7 . Dwyer, David F. & Phyllis A. 12.1 Connecticut Avenue 160 Edgewood Drive 22 . Carter, Rise, Storrs, Bement 8 . Havenel, John P. Jr. , & Mary Ellen 330 Nutmer Road South 152 Edgewood Drive 23. Frito-Lay, Inc. 9 . Nicholas, Peter G. & Betty D. 160 Nutmeg Road South 144 Edgewood Drive 10. Marlow, Paul R. & Gail A. 124 Edgewood Drive 11. Greenburg, Stanley & Lillian S. 116 Edgewood Drive 12 . Calderon, Rocco S. & Joanne L. 106 Edgewood Drive 13 . Downs, Robert G. & Barbara 98 Edgewood Drive 14 . Horan, Theodore J. & Maureen 88 Edgewood Drive 15. March, Arline B. 80 Edgewood Drive ■ ,?esign ofessionals, inc. civil engineers • planners • surveyors ■ October' 23 , 1989 To Current Abutter: Re: Governor' s Square Business Center Nutmeg Road South South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Project No. 86-142 Please be advised that our client, Capuano Builders and Developers, has applied to the South Windsor Inland Wetland Agency/Conservation Commission for approval of land development (Buildings E-H, O and other related improvements) . Any questions should be directed to the South Windsor Planning Department at the Town Hall, Telephone No. 644-2511. Thank you. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: phen iancardi Project Planner CC: South Windsor Planning Department Paul Capuano Irwin Hausman, Esq. 1170 Ellington Road (Route 30), South Windsor, CT 06074 0 (203) 291-8755 i a�4 y t vzo,� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 R-c° AREA CODE 203/644-2511 October� tober 23, 1989 TO: - James A. Lombardi, Chairman, Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission FROM: John E. McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer k ,�'fyj. RE: A DOCUMENTS REVIEWED: Application form, Site Plans for Governors Square Business Center Building E, F, G, and H, dated 10/4/89, and Runoff Analysis by Design Professionals, Inc. COMMENTS: This is a portion of the area submitted for redesi nation wetlands earlier this year. That application (#89g39P) was f withdrawn by the applicant prior to the public hearing. OK ,,2':vzt The plans indicate limit of inland wetlands as verified in the field. The Certified Soil Scientist should be identified On the plans and a report should be submitted to substantiate the j flagging and .redesignation. The riprap for outlet protection, as shown on t he S _ n and sedimentation control plan, should be shown on the esite oplan. There are two outlets into the basin which is westerly of building F which do not have riprap indicated. This should be evaluated to determine if riprap is necessary. �� There is fill and a roadstub proposed adjacent to the wetlands easterly of the site. The application states, "fill is to be native sand and gravel" , this should also be stated on the plans (clean fill) . s1� UA In the sequence of construction, #3 states "topsoil will be e-W4 stockpiled at location of proposed building J. This building is not identified on the plans. Se % 7 , The purpose and final destination of the "temporary haul road o � eq crossing" , is not identified on the plans. 8. Existing and proposed spot elevations should be provided in the S swale. October 27 , 1989 Page TWO ,ombardi 89_86P application # �) v should be moved 4�„•� � �k • crossing construction of temporary haul road to allow for 9 . � The propose the westerly direction slightly outlet into the Swale• South the proposed to be deeded to the indicate nine acres are The plans ation Trust. abandoned Land Cons 6 /k .ak %,�c Windsor * S° which will be removed 'abandoned addressed s�,./tiot a�ement °f the pavement should There is existing D position P7� Newberry Road) . laps . CONDITIONS INCLUDE= on the P SUGG1%ST APPROVAL �k r,"k• the plans IF APPROVE IS CONSIDBRBD# be identified on oil Scientist shall "r,ok The Certified S l be submitted. control plan and a report shall the erosion and sedimentation Qv The riprap shown on the site plans . that all x shall be shown on the plans to identify Y°shall be included on 3: AOO A statement be clean used for an fill. stockpiling, the is to be fill shall OK .f r4ktheca area of bui identified on the plan*-� I shall behaul road location the temporary road shall and area included for laps. The haul ,�•°K ur °shall be identified on the p The P prior to use. crossing the field p the be established in of elevations shall be shown in S�'""'� Existing and proposed spot 'Which into the basin IleSwale. the outlets 54'""IRipraP shall be indicated for �. of building F' be shifted westerly to is westerly.[ Alt haul road shall Swale. The pr°,osed temporary of the outlet into the constructionlaps, which shall be allow for on the P Trust- There shown ation �—;ieeded ere are nine Windsor Land Consery to the South M s� . shall indicated�h�o�.�.f of ex%s,� 10 . Thert f �c c c�✓S-C o� k�x 819 Clark St. �,tibteerf South Windsor Ct. dv May 10, 1989 'A 1�-�- Mr. Paul Capuano Capuano Developers ! Dec 1208 Cromwell Ave. Rocky Hill, Ct. 06067 Dear Mr Capuano: On Monday evening May 8th the Board of Directors of the South Windsor Land Trust met to discuss the possible acquisition of a conservation easement from you on approximately eight acres of land which located nea�C Edgewat�r Drive. 1 "'i.., N4J O I am pleased to tell you that we have a high level of interest in proceeding with your proposal. The trust would like such an easement to give us unconditional control over the use and access to the property. We would expect you or successor owners of your adjacent property to retain responsibility for the maintenance of the property and to help us in meeting the nominal costs of insurance for the property. It is most important that you understand that we are neither in favor or against any project that you may propose to South Windsor- regulators. Our good name should not be used to promote any project. Whenever you describe our involvement in the conservation property we would like you state such a disclaimer on our behalf. This is consistence with our organization's routine policy. Sincerely, Robert M. Finch, President South Windsor Land Trust Robert M.Finch,C.F.A. Vice President /Etna Equity Investors JEtna Investment Management(croup cityPlace-Y881 Hartford,Connecticut 06166 (203)276-3767 !Etna Uts Insurance company i The!Etna Casuaity and Surety company j I Penelope C. Sharp Environmental Consultant 225 Reeds Gap Road East Northford, CT 06472 (203) 484-0134 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for GOVERNOR'S SQUARE NUTMEG ROAD SOUTH SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT Prepared By: Penelope C. Sharp December 18, 1989 INTRODUCTION On Tuesday, December 5, 1989, a field investigation was conducted at property known as Governor's Square located at the east side of Nutmeg Road South in South Windsor, Connecticut. The purpose of the field visit was to examine the wetland habitats associated with the swale system and to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development upon the wetlands. Although the undeveloped portions of the Governor's Square property were examined, emphasis was placed upon two areas: 1) The location for proposed Building E, F, G, and H; and 2) The location for proposed Building O. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE PLAN ASSESSMENT Buildings E, F, G, and H are proposed to be constructed on an upland area. South of the proposed building location is an existing swale which is part of an overall system of man-made drainage ditches. The swales have been in place for two growing seasons and currently are characterized by having a diverse mix of wetland plant species. The swale to the south of the four proposed buildings supports a variety of herbaceous plants including cattail, soft rush, woolgrass, bulrush, goldenrods, purple loosestrife, seedbox and several species of sedge. The development plans include the addition of a detention basin at the eastern terminus of the swale. The basin will be 9, 600 square feet in size. An additional detention area, smaller in size, will be created to the north, east of proposed -2- f Building G. Both detention areas will be planted with a wet meadow mix. It is anticipated that they will develop into wetland habitats capable of performing a number of wetland functions such as flood storage, pollution filtration, and wildlife habitat, particularly for small mammals and songbirds. The creation of the two detention areas will provide an addition of 0.27 acres of wetland to the site. The construction of Building O and its parking area will require the filling of a small area of wetlands and the relocation of an existing drainage ditch. At the southwest corner of the Governor's Square property is a small wooded wetland. Red maples dominate the canopy layer and several red oaks are present also. The dominant shrub is sweet pepperbush. Other plant species observed in this wetland area include silky dogwood, wild grape, hay scented fern, lady fern, and tree clubmoss. The wetland is relatively low in species diversity and is intersected by the remains of a deep drainage ditch created some time ago. The fact that the wetland is surrounded by development reduces its value as wildlife habitat, although it does provide an environment for squirrels, songbirds and some other small animals. To the north of the woods is an existing drainage swale which will be partially filled and relocated to become a part of a large detention basin. At present, the swale supports little vegetation. It has steep banks which are eroding slowly and which are too steep to support any substantial vegetation. The proposed -3- detention basin will be 51, 000 square feet in size. It will be planted with rushes, sedges and other marsh/wet meadow plant species. While emergent plants from the nearby swales may eventually colonize the basin, the most reliable means of establishing wetland vegetation is to plant the basin as is proposed by this site plan. Detailed recommendations for the wetland creation are provided in the next section of this report. \ It is expected that the new detention area will add over an acre of viable wetland and will offset the loss of wetland which will occur during the construction of Building O. PREPARATION OF DETENTION BASINS The recommendations for the construction of the detention basins are essentially the same for the three areas even though there is a difference in size amongthem. The largest of the g three basins is the one associated with Building O. Once the detention areas have been graded to the desired depth, they should be lined with topsoil. The basin floors should be planted with a mix of rushes (Juncus spp. ) and sedges (Carex spp. ) . Other plants appropriate for the detention basin floor are bulrush (Scirpus sp. ) , woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus) , and bur-reed (Sparganium sp. ) . I would also recommend that cattails (Typha latifolia) be planted near the outlet of the largest detention area. A wet meadow seed mix should be scattered around the edges of the bottom floor and along the side slopes. Shrubs such as pussy willow (Salix discolor) , northern arrowwood (Viburnum -4- p recognitum) , and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) should be randomly planted around the banks of the large detention area. Following the planting and seeding, all three areas should be mulched. In the two larger basins, a few deep pockets could be dug into the basin floor to ensure adequate water for the growing marsh/wet meadow. Based upon the observed vegetation in the existing drainage swales, it would seem likely that all three proposed detention areas will develop into viable wetland areas which will support diverse communities of wetland plants. All three areas should function to attenuate pollution, store floodwater, and provide habitat for small mammals, songbirds, and water fowl. SUMMARY In reviewing this plan, it is important to consider the fact that there is a balance between wetland disturbance and wetland creation. Detention Basin #1 on the west side of Nutmeg Road South now supports a diverse assemblage of wetlands plant species and offers desirable wildlife habitat for small mammals, songbirds, and waterfowl. On the project site, between eight to nine acres of good quality, undisturbed wetland have been set -5- { aside for conservation purposes. Under the proposed plan for Buildings E, F, G, H and O there will be no net loss of wetland acreage on the site. Respectfully submitted, P nelope C. Sharp Enclosures Note: Please refer to attached report of Burkhardt Environmental, Inc. for listing of wetland species in various locations on the site. -6- 127 Hosley Ave., Branford, CT 06405 203-488-9407 October 29, 1988 Mr. Steve Colbath Design Professionals, Inc. 1170 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT. 06074 Be: Project No. 88-30: Capuano _ Nutmeg Road South - South Windsor, CT. Dear Mr. Colbath: I have enclosed a copy of the letter sent to Mr. Copusno the above site. The enclosed map and following text identifiesegarding ecological communities on the site as requested by you end Mr. DeMallie. Boundaries are approximate as information was transferred 1"=200' scale to the 1"=100" scale from the plan, which has no topography or significant physical features. Generally, the entire site contains level to slight slopes. Deer tracks and trails are abundant on the site. Raccoon tracks were observed around the western drainage ditches. A number of song birds were also observed in those d surrounding fields. Please n itches and the mate that the vegetative species lists are not all inclusive. A - Artificial drainage ditch with unstable sandy banks, and rock riprap banks at the northeastern and. Thick herbaceous growth in the center of the ditch, and diverse vegetation on the banks. Acer rubrum Red maple C erus strigosus Umbrella sedge atorium perfoliatum Boneset g Juncus effusus Soft rush Pr lus tremuloides Trembling aspen Prunes serotim Black cherry Rhos typhina FkAxis app. - Staghorn sumac Selix spp. Blackberry and raspberry us c Willow cir E_ yperinus Wool-grass Solidego app. Goldenrod Verbena hastata Blue vervain B - Drainage sweles surrounding Site Two with banks mowed regularly. Some herbaceous wetland species in center of ditches. C - Disturbed field areas vegetated with a er Trees and shrubs predominant and thiickkin mos f pioneer species. :primarily sapling size. Area includes eastern bet areas. Trees r " t 2 Acer rubrum Red maple Alnus spp. Alder Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common ragweed Betula populifolia Gray birch Carex stricta Tussock sedge M rice app. Wax myrtle Denothers biennis Evening primrose Dnocles sensibilis Sensitive fern Phragmites communis Reed Populus tremuloides Trembling aspen Quercus spp. Oak Rhus spp. Sumac Salix spp. Willow Scir us cyperinus Wool-grass Solidago spp. Goldenrod Tres tomentose Steeplebush D - Primarily upland fields with grasses, some landscaping, abandoned cars, etc. E - Stand of pole size hardwoods, dominated by red maple and red oak, surrounding the drainage ditch. Trail on south bank. Understory very sparse with some scatted ferns. Gray birch also present. F - Woods surrounding a remnant drainage ditch. Dverstory dominated by red maples and red oaks. Understory dominated by sweet pepperbush. Acer rubrum Red maple Athyrium Filix-femina Lady fern Betula a_lleghaniensis Yellow birch Cleth ar alnifolis Sweet pepperbush Corns stolonifera Red-osier dogwood Dennstaedtia punctilobula Hoyscented fern Prows serotina Black cherry Qu_ercus rubra Red oak Ulmus americana American elm Viburnum reconnitm Northern arrowwood Vitis spp. Grape G - Artificial drainage ditches with well established herbaceous layer and standing water throughout the year. Tadpoles observed. Carex spp. Sedge Cyperus i_r osus Umbrella sedge Jun�cus canadensis Rush Juncus effusus Soft rush Eleocharis spp. Spike rush Phragmites comnunis Reed Polygonum spp. Smartweed Typhe latifolia Cattail 3 H - Cattail-reed pocket. Carex stricter Tussock sedge Corns stolonifere Red-osier dogwood Cyperinus strigosus Umbrella sedge Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern Phr'agmites cormxini s Reed Scir us cyperins Read Wool-grass Spires tomantosa Steeplebusfn TyPha letifolis Cattail Verbena hastata Blue vervain I - Old asphalt road and remnants of road. J - Field dominated by herbaceous vegetation. Western portion is wetland dominated by blue vervain, evening primrose, grasses, and goldenrods. Asclepias s riaca Common milkweed Aster app. Aster rus strigosus Umbrella sedge Juncus effusus Soft rush Oenothera biernis Evening primrose Phragmites communis Reed Polygonum lapethifolium Pale sme►'tweed Solidago spp, Goldenrod Verbena hastata Blue vervain K - Field with thick, tangled growth dominated by goldenrods, rose, and blackberry and raspberry. L - Wooded drain age e g ditches with numerous fallen trees, which separate the cultivated fields. Acer ru_ brum Red maple Athyrium Filix-femina Lady fern Betuls populifolia Gray birch Clethri alnifolia Sweet pepperbush Oanneteedtia punctilobula Hayscented fern Ono clea sensibilis Sensitive fern Oemunde cinnamomiea Cinnamon fern 'Prunus serotins Black cherry Quercus bi—co r Swamp white oak Quercus rubra Red oak spp' Blackberry and raspberry Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry Viburnum taco gnitum Northern arrowwood Vitis spp• Grape y 4 M - Woods with more age classes and more diversity of species than N. Acer rubrum Red maple Acer saccharum Sugar maple Athyrium Filix-femina Lady fern Clethre alnifolis Sweet pepperbush Ilex verticillats Winterberry Lycopodium spp. Clubmoss Prune spp. Cherry Quercus albs White oafs Querous rubra Red oak Quercus velutina Black oak Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry N - Woods bisected by heavily used trail, which continues eastward along southern edge of woods. Red oaks end sweet pepperbush dominant vegetative species. Overstory trees west of trail primarily of one age class, and canopy thicker than east of trail. Dumping and encroachment of rear yards has occurred along the southern portion. Aoer rubrum Red maple Athyrium Filix-femina Lady fern Betula populifolia Gray birch Clethra alnifolie Sweet pepperbush Hemamelis virginiana Witch hazel Lycopodium spp. Clubmoss Prunus spp. Cherry Quercus albs White oak Quercus palustris Pin oak Quercus rubra Red oak Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry Viburnum recognitum Northern arrowwood O - Fields under cultivation. Potatoes most recent crops. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ir� E. Burkhardt Ak Penelope C. Sharp Environmental Consultant RstSIVEJ 225 Reeds Gap Road East, DEC N189 Northford, CT 06472 (203) 484-0134 South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for GOVERNOR'S SQUARE NUTMEG ROAD SOUTH SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT Prepared By: Penelope C. Sharp December, 1989 f INTRODUCTION On Tuesday, December 5, 1989, a field investigation was conducted at property known as Governor's Square located at the east side of Nutmeg Road South in South Windsor, Connecticut. The purpose of the field visit was to examine the wetland habitats associated with the swale system and to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development upon the wetlands. Although the undeveloped portions of the Governor's Square property were examined, emphasis was placed upon two areas: 1) The location for proposed Building E, F, G, and H; and 2) The location for proposed Building O. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE PLAN ASSESSMENT Buildings E, F., G, and H are proposed to be constructed on an -�,�i�'a upland area. South of the proposed building location is an existing swale which is part of an overall system of man-made i { drainage ditches. The swales have been in place for two growing seasons and currently are characterized by having a diverse mix of wetland plant species. The swale to the south of the four proposed buildings supports a variety of herbaceous plants including cattail, soft rush, woolgrass, _bulrush, goldenrods, purple loosestrife, seedbox and several species of sedge. The development plans include the addition of a detention basin at the eastern terminus of the swale. The basin will be 9, 600 square feet in size. An additional detention area, smaller in size, will be created to the north, east of proposed -2- <, Building G. Both detention areas will be planted with a wet meadow mix. It is anticipated that they will develop into wetland habitats capable of performing a number of wetland functions such as flood storage, pollution filtration, and wildlife habitat, particularly for small mammals and songbirds. The creation of the two detention areas will provide an addition of 0. 27 acres of wetland to the site. The construction of Building O and its parking area will require the filling of a small area of wetlands and the relocation of an existing drainage ditch. At the southwest corner of the Governor's Square property is a small wooded wetland. Red maples dominate the canopy layer and several red oaks are present also. The dominant shrub is sweet pepperbush. Other plant species observed in this wetland area include silky dogwood, wild grape, hay scented fern, lady fern, and tree clubmoss. The wetland is relatively low in species diversity and is a small wooded area intersected by the remains of a deep drainage ditch created some time ago. The fact that the wetland is surrounded by development reduces its value as wildlife habitat, although it does provide an environment for squirrels, songbirds and some other small animals. To the north of the woods is an existing drainage swale which will be partially filled and relocated to become a part of a large detention basin. At present, the swale supports little vegetation. It has steep banks which are eroding slowly and which are too steep to support any substantial vegetation. The proposed -3- detention basin will be designed and planted to become a more functional and viable wetland than the present drainage swale. PREPARATION OF DETENTION BASINS The recommendations for the construction of the detention basins are essentially the same for the three areas even though there is a difference in size among them. The largest of the three basins is the one associated with Building O and is planned to be acres in size. Once the detention areas have been graded to the desired depth, they should be lined with topsoil. The basin floors should be planted with a mix of rushes (Juncus spp. ) and sedges (Carex spp. ) . Other plants ap propriate ppropriate for the detention basin floor are bulrush (Scirpus sp. ) , woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus) , and bur-reed (Sparganium sp. ) . I would also recommend that cattails (Typha latifolia) be planted near the outlet of the largest detention ?' area. A wet meadow seed mix should be scattered around the edges of the bottom floor and along the side slopes. Shrubs such as Pussy willow (Salix discolor) , northern arrowwood (Viburnum I recognitum) , and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) should be randomly planted around the banks of the large detention area. Following the planting and seeding, all three areas should be mulched. In the two larger basins, a few deep pockets could be dug into the basin floor to ensure adequate water for the growing marsh/wet meadow. -4- Based upon the observed vegetation in the existing drainage swales, it would seem likely that all three proposed detention areas will develop into viable wetland areas which will support diverse communities of wetland plants. All three areas should function to attenuate pollution, store floodwater, and provide habitat for small mammals, songbirds, and water fowl . In reviewing this plan, it is important to consider the fact that there is a balance between wetland disturbance and wetland creation. Detention Basin #1 on the west side of Nutmeg Road South now supports a diverse assemblage of wetlands plant species and offers desirable wildlife habitat for small mammals, songbirds, and waterfowl . On the project site, between eight to nine acres of good quality, undisturbed wetland have been set aside for conservation purposes. Under the proposed plan for Buildings E, F, G, H and O there will be no net loss of wetland areas on the site. Respectfully submitted, Penelope C. Sharp i Enclosures Note: Please refer to attached report of Burkhardt Environmental, Inc. for listing of wetland species in various locations on the site. -5- q OwN 8fq P 7own O-PSOUZA 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 f��sox•co�' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 19 , 1989 TO: James Lombardi, Chairman, Inland Wetland Agency/Conservation Commission n FROM: John E. McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer y� RE: Application #89-86P, Governors Square Business Center Buildings E, F, G, H Please accept this as a follow-up to my letter dated October 23, 1989 . Consideration has been given to documents, correspondence, and plans submitted up to this date. IF APPROVAL IS CONSIDERED, SUGGESTED APPROVAL CONDITIONS INCLUDE: 1 . The plans shall indicate that existing pavement which is, "to be removed" shall be taken to an approved bulky waste site. 2. The temporary crossings for the haul road shall be removed, and the areas restored to their original conditions, prior to the release of the erosion and sedimentation bond. 3 . The wet meadow mix, indicated on sheet 5 of 9, shall be detailed on the plans in accordance with the recommendations in the report from Penelope C. Sharp, Environmental Consultant. SOWN 8fq O - 5 To� O-P Soa� ?A�Z� o w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe•co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 5, 1990 Capuano Builders and Developers Paul Capuano 1208 Cromwell Avenue Rocky Hill, CT 06067 Dear Mr. Capuano.- Re: Application #89-86P, Governors Square, Buildings E,F,G & H Application #89-87P, Governors Square, Building 0 Due to the number of pending applications, and the additional information submitted relative to your application,_the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission is asking the applicant, for the agenda items referenced above, to request a 65 day extension of the time to act on the application. We have enclosed a standard form for your convenience. Please send us this request as soon as possible. We appreciate your cooperation. Very truly yours, Ja, es A. Lombardi, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission JAL/pmm Enclosure cc: Wetlands File r . Environmental Management Courtxelorrt Inc. 165 Oak Ridge / Ber-lin, CT 06037 203-828-0787 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS OF THE PARKCENTRE DEVELOPMENT, SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT Submitted by: Leon J. Gorski, Ph.D. , President D. Reed Ostrander, Ph.D. , Executive Consultant Charles Wm. Dimmick, Ph. D. , Executive Consultant W� . � . March 9, 1982 Sou n �fJ indso+NGf I INLAND WETLANCOw MISSIQN. Iin r•hurt rrr cn I ci► S�RVA�ION [;vnh�utinrr�t GON it'crtcr IZcsc�ur'cc°s Laild 11sc 11111)nct slutcwrcrrls 1'rc•-pla fill irrSr Y GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS PARKCENTRE DEVELOPMENT, SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT. Introduction The Parkcentre Development is an industrial park complex in South Windsor borddred on the west by John Fitch Boulevard (U.S. Route 5) , on -the north by Governor ' s Highway, and on the south by South Satellite Road. To the east is a residential development called Pleasant Valley Estates. Both the industrial park and the residential development have a history of high groundwater problems. EMC, Inc. was asked to investigate the groundwater situation in and near the industrial park and to determine what effect, if any, the activities in the park, past and future, might have on the ground- water in the adjacent residential area. This report was prepared by Dr. Charles Wm. Dimmick, a Certified ' Professional Geologist, whose background and credentials are attached to this report for informational purposes. Materials used in prepar- . ing this report include boring data obtained by Engineering Services, Inc. , Glastonbury, Connecticut (Clarence Welti) in September of 1967 and by Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (on contract to Purcell Asso- ciates, Glastonbury) in June, 1976. Pertinent data from the boring logs is included in Table I and test hole locations are shown on the accompanying map entitled, "Groundwater Study of the Parkcentre Development. " Geology and Soils The entire area is underlain by old lake bed silts and varved clays on top of which are 12 to 20 feet of alluvial and glacial 2 . outwash sands. The top of the varved clays is remarkably flat (about 3 ft. variation in elevation) and the variation of sand thickness is mainly a reflection of surface topography. The soils which have developed are a reflection of topography and depth to groundwater. All of the soils show presence of a seasonal high water table. Where this seasonal high water table is ,mo_re than_a foot below the surface, Sudbury and Uj_ni.grit fine sandy loams have developed. Where the seasonal high water table was historically at or almost at the surface, Walpole fine sand--y__._Loams developed; and , where the water table stayed high year-round the • very poorly drained Scarboro loams developed. Long use of the land for agricultural pur- Poses included partial drainage of the wetter areas, but this has not changed the basic soil characteristics. Recent construction activi- ties have involved massive redistribution of the surficial materials over much of the site, making it difficult to determine in the field what the original soil conditions were. Thus, for this report, we have depended on the February 1962 Soil Survey of Hartford County, Connecticut and the "South Windsor Inland Wetlands and Watercourses" map of March 1974 for pre-construction conditions. Groundwater Conditions Inspection of soil and topographic maps reveals that ground- water would have been very near the surface, bredevelopment, on both the industrial site and the adjacent residential site during the wet seasons. Much of both areas are underlain by poorly drained and very Poorly drained wetland soils. Groundwater would be at its highest 3. elevation (about 78 ft. ) just north of the playground N.W. of Edgewood Drive, with' the water table sloping to the south, east, and west. Within the residential development, the groundwater would be highest (75-76 ft. ) just west of the north-west section of Judy Lane, sloping to both east and west. The water table mounds under Barbara Road, sloping away in all directions, and slopes both north and south from the lots lying on the south side Of Judy Lane. Originally, the slope of the water table to the west was more to the southwest and was very gentle, about one foot vertical for every 300 foot horizontal, or a slope of 0. 34%. Two man-made constructions have changed the picture. The first was the digging of the old farm ditch which lies on the .border between the industrial park and the residential area. This lowered the wet season water table as much as three feet in the vicinity of the ditch and Newberry Road. Except_ for those homes within 200 feet of the ditch, it would not have had a significant effect on water levels within the residential area. The second change was the excavation of the area between the old ditch and Newberry Road and the construction of a new ditch. This has dramatically lowered the wet season water table on the industrial site, in some places by as much as six feet; but the effects would probably not be noticed in the residential area except for a Plightlowering of water levels in the backyards of the two homes just south of the playground. In summary, none of the activities on the industrial site have raised the water table on the adjacent residential area, nor have s 4 . they contributed to a significant lowering of the water table more than 200 feet from the actual construction. Groundwater Fluctuations Both the wetland and non-wetland soils in this area are subject to dramatic seasonal and longer-term changes in groundwater level. . It is not unusual to find an area of Walpole soils with water at the surface in early April and the depth to the water table six fee t down in late August. Both shorter-term and longer-term fluctuations are also common. Standpipes placed on the Parkcentre site by Palm- berg and Russo show the water table rising one and one-half feet in a week after a period of heavy rainfall and dropping one-tenth of a foot per day thereafter. On a longer term groundwater levels were very low throughout Connecticut from 1957 to 1964, were very high in the mid-1970' s and dropped dramatically again in late 1980 through August of 1981. At the time of this report, groundwater conditions are close to normal. The problem with these fluctuations is that they are of the same order of magnitude or larger than the changes due to construction and thus would mask the effects of construction. Future Construction Plans for the Parkcentre site include partial filling of the area previously excavated. As long as there are underdrains la under the fill and the fill is mostly free-draining material, P placed there should be no significant adverse effect on water table levels. Table l Testhole Data used for parkcentre':Study 7-r , Ground Ground water Elevato ' Hole No. elevation } elevation of da�r` .;;''Da't'e,.drilled 11-3 74 70 61 . 5 9/1/67 W-4 72. 5 68. 5 58. 5 9/1/67 W`5 72. 5 69 58 .5 9/1/67 W-7 77. 5 72 61. 5 9/5/67 PV-2 (1) 73 69. 5 58* 6/24/76 PV-4 75 71. � 61 6/23/76 PV-101 74 70. 5 ?** 6/24/76 PV-102 (2) 72 66 59 6/24/76 Holes with numbers starting with W were drilled Inc. (Now Clarence Welti Associates Inc. ) y Engineering Services, Holes with numbers starting with PV were drilled by Geotechnical Consultants Inc. for Purcell :Associates. * Hole stopped at 15' without reaching clay. ** 10-foot hole depth (1) Two feet of fill; original soil level 71 ft. elevation; wetland soil type. (2) Four feet of fill; original soil level 68 ft. elevation; wetland soil type. Water levels in September 1967 were preceded dry weather, but heavy rain August26tha 2�thwo months of relatively Water levels in June 1976 were preceded by a normal spring with no early drought. n Name: Charles William Dintmick Present Status: Associate Professor of Geology- Central Connecticut State College New Britain, Connecticut Associate Consultant Environmental Management Counselors Berlin, Connecticut Education: B.S. - Colorado School of Mines, 1962 - Geological cal Engineering M. S - 9 University of Florida, 1964 - Geology/Biology Ph. D. - Tulane University, 1969 - Paleontology Experience: College Instructor of courses' in Geologic Field Methods, Physical and Historical Geology, Geonorohology, Geochronology, Seismology, Astrogeology, Cosmogony, Minerology, Oceanography and Environmental Geology Geologic Engineer - Mobil Oil Company, New Orleans District Office - Well-log interpretation and -computer programning of subsurface geologic information, 1965 Recipient of grant for advanced study, Tulane University - National Science Foundation Primary research interests include hydraulics in relation to' inland and tidal wetlands in pre and post development conditions, soils determinations regarding inland wetlands and identification Of soil/plant associations, Engineering water retention systems and erosion and sedimentation control methodology for application to land and .marine development procedures Associate Consultant of Environmental Management Counselors with primary responsibility in wetland soils identification , geological interpretation and engineering appraisal i ns ivortaterlCal ArartcrgentCTtt caurl scla f3 Inc 165 Oak Ridge / Berlin, CT 06037 203-828-0787..' ._ c. 1 ,i .'+ .. •�� '•}r i. t•s T.`,+aid �+ _H_4 THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CUNSELORSZ' t PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND ltrater Resources Land Use Impact Statements Pre-planning ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COUNSELORS Environmental Management Counselors (EMC) was founded in 1973 as a direct result of a federally funded project designed to pro vide scientific expertise to Connecticut ' s towns and cities wrestling with application of newly created inland wetland and watercourse regulations ( P . A. 155 , Connecticut General Statutes) . A consortium of biologists , ecologists , geologists , soil scientists , and hydrol- ogists applied their various skills to facilitate and coordinate environmental decision-making at the community level . The task was accomplished by advising the various community conservation and wet- land agencies involved. At the end of the 12-month funding period requests for assistance continued and resulted in the formation of a private firm - Environmental Management Counselors . EMC provides comprehensive services in the development of a complete site analysis including mapping of site characteristics , engineering evaluation, special feature delineation , geological analysis and aquatic studies, each of which are appropriately documented as a matter of procedure for each site investigation . The following is a sample list of applicable projects that have been undertaken by EMC staff consultants in recent years : 1 . Environmental Impact Evaluation of Industrial Development Activities Adjacent to Tidal Wetlands , Fairhaven , Connecticut. 2 . Evaluation of Environmental Implications of Residential Develop- ment on the Tulip Tree Properties of Darien , Connecticut. 3 . Environmental Evaluation of the Development of the Carriage Hill. Shopping Center on the Post Road , Westport , Connecticut. V , 2 4 . The Environmental Implications of the Erection of Condominiums in Shelton, Connecticut. 5. Environmental Evaluation of Gorham 's Island as a Potential D eve)op_ ment Site, Westport, Connecticut. 6. An Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Proposed Pier and Pilings on the Five Mile River, Darien , Connecticut. 7 . An Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Proposed Constructio n of the Glenbrook Pump Station , Darien, Connecticut. 8• A Review of the Potential Environmental Impact of the Development Of Connecticut Park. Raceway, Wolcott, Connecticut. 9 . An Environmental Study of Alternative Methods for Supplying PP Ying New York City with Potable Water in the Year 2020, Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York Segments. 10 . Preliminary Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of a ProP osed Recreational Facility in the Lordship Area of Stratford, Connecticu. 11 . An Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of the Laurel Par k Greyhound Raceway , Stratford , Connecticut. 12. An Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Proposed Pier and Moorings at Noroton Bay, Darien , Connecticut, 13.• An Environmental Evaluation of Site Development P Plans of the Tobaccc Farms Company for the Suffield, Connecticut Conse,rvation Commission Suffield, Connecticut. u ' 14 . An Analysis of Greensfarms Road Properties for Potential Develop- ment as Light Industrial -and Residential Areas, Westport, Connecticut. 15.. Site Analysis and Characterization for Location of Union Carbide Corporate Headquarters, Danbury/Ridgefield, Connecticut. 16 . Wetlands Analysis for Proposed Greyhound Racing Facility , Thomaston, Connecticut. 17 . An Evaluation of Site Characteristics , Wetlands Delineation, and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for Darien Dinner Theater, Darien , Connecticut. 18. Tidal Wetlands and Site Analysis of Location of Island Creek Condominium, Fairfield , Connecticut. 19 . Inland Wetlands Delineation and Engineering of Retention Ponds for Park North Condominium, Fairfield, Connecticut. 20. Review and Analysis of Inland Wetlands for Brighton Park Subdivision, Westport, Connecticut. 21 . Planning and Inland Wetlands Delineation and Drainage Study for Stoneridge Subdivision , Fairfield , Connecticut. 22. An Evaluation of Beach Erosion for Lordship, Stratford , Connecticut. 23. Flood Potential Analysis and Site Development for Subdivision on the Noroton River, Darien, Connecticut. 24 . Inland Wetlands Delineation and Retention Pond Design for Hedge Brook Estates , Stamford, Connecticut. 25. Water Duality and Wetlands Analysis for Brook Apartments n s, Seymour., Connecticut. _ 26. Water Quality and Tidal Wetlands Evaluation for Schiavone , Inc. Scrap Metal Reclamation Co. , North Haven , Connecticut. 27 . Retention Pond Design and Inland Wetland Delineatio n for Sheep- hill Condominium, Riverside, Connecticut. 28 . Wetlands Delineation Study, Town of Southington,g , Connecticut. 29 . Wetlands Delineation Study, City of New Britain Connecticut. 30 . Site Planning and Inland Wetlands Delineation for Pe pperbush Subdivision , Darien, Connecticut. 31 . Comprehensive Vegetational Analysis of Great Meadow s for Stratford Land and Improvement Company, Stratford, Connecticut. 32. Tidal -Wetland Delineation for Bridgeport - Air or k p t, Bridgeport, Connecticut. 33. Wetland Impact, Sound Emission Control and Project ed ted Watercourse Utilization Plan for Route 72 Construction, Town of Plainville Connecticut. 34 . Review of I-291 Environmental Impact Statement for I-291 No Committee, Newington and Rocky Hill , Connecticut. � . 35 . ' Additions and Alterations to , St. Paul 's Episcopal Church , Darien, Connecticut . 36. United States Postal Facility, Stamford, ,Connec 'Connecticut. EIS. 5 - 37 . New Haven Terminal Company Assesment Areas Associated With Petroleum Storage Facility, East Have, Connecticut. 38. Environmental Evaluation - Water Ouality ' and Biological Analysis Regarding. Armonk , N. Y. Land Fill Proposal . 39 . Review of Connecticut Route 66 - Impact on Hubbard Park and Environs, Meriden , Connecticut. 40 . Analysis of Stebbin 's Brook Waters, Ensign-Bickford Properties, Simsbury, Connecticut. 41 . Environmental Analysis - Darien United Methodist Church Property , Darien , Connecticut. 42. D 'Addario Industries - Hoyt Farms Development, New Canaan , Connecticut. 43. Bunker Ramo; A Study of Potential Development Adjacent .to Present Corporate Facilities, Trumbull, Connecticut. 44. E.R. Strait Marina Expansion - Environmental Analysis of Dredging g g and Jetty Installation , Westport, Connecticut. 45. The Conyers Farm Development, Greenwich, CT and North Castle, NY- Coordination of Environmental Impact Analysis 46. Saltwater Intrusion Study- Westport, Connecticut 47. Gorham Island-Study of Possible Groundwater Pollution and Saltwater Intrusion , Westport, Connecticut 48. Groundwater Protection Study Route 77, Guilford, Connecticut t 49 . Groundwater Study, Burr Meadow Project—South Windsor, Connectic ut 50. Hydrogeological Study Former Famous Artists School Property in Westport, Connecticut PRINCIPAL PERSONNEL Name: Charles Willian DiMmick Present Status: Associate Professor of Geology. Central Connecticut State College New Britain, Connecticut Associate Consultant Environmental Management Counselors Berlin, Connecticut Education: B. S. - Colorado School of Mines, 1962 - Geological Engineering M.S. University of Florida, 1964 Geology/Biology Ph:D. - Tulane University, 1969 - Paleontology experience: College Instructor of courses in Geologic Field Methods, Physical' and Historical Geology, .Geonorphology, Geochronology, Seismology, Astrogeology, Cosmogony, Minerology, Oceanography and Environmental Geology Geologic Engineer - Mobil Oil Company, New Orleans District Office - Well-log interpretation and computer- programming of t. subsurface geologic information, 1965 Recipient of .grant for advanced study, Tulane University = National Science Foundation . Primary *research 'interests include hydraulics in relation ' to'•� inland and tidal wetlands in pre and post development conditions; soils determinations regarding inland wetlands and identification Of soil/plant associations, Engineering water retention systems and erosion and sedimentation control methodology for application to land and marine development procedures Associate Consultant of Environmental Management Counselors with primary responsibility in wetland soils identification, geological interpretation and engineering appraisal - �•��_ �rt��ir•onrrtertt�all��ttrt�berttertt C�aartr�elQr•�, �r:c. { 165 Oak Ridge / Berlin, CT 06037 203-828-0787 THE EMC COUNSELORS Executive Consultant Leon J. Gorski , Ph.D. : Environmental Scientist/Environmental Management Specialist, President EMC Inc. Dr. Gorski holds advanced degrees in Environmental Science from the University of Connecticut . and is the Project Manager for EMC' s environmental studies. His previous experience includes ecological research in the United States, Central and South America and the development of environmental management techniques for use in guiding development practices. As Executive Consultant, he coordinates all aspects of each Project to provide maximum attention to the client's interests. He is responsible for the design of each evaluation and oversees the method of presentation to responsible agencies. Associate Consultant Darl Reed Ostrander, Ph.D. : Water Quality/Wetlands Specialist and Botanist Dr. Ostrander holds advanced degrees from the University of Michigan and the University of Connecticut. Primary consultive responsibilities: Wetland identification utilizing vegetation, nutrient movement in wetland environments, wetland restoration, water quality investigations and interpretation. Associate Consultant Charles Wm Dimmick, Ph.D. : Environmental Engineer and Certified Professional Geologist Dr. Dimmick holds a geological engineering degree from the Colorado School of Mines and advanced degrees from the University of Florida and Tulane University. His previous experience includes oil well exploration and operation, seismology, minerology, oceanology and hydrology. Primary consultive responsibilities : Hydrologic studies, drainage computation and retention system design, geological feature delineation and engineering evaluations. Errrirortrrrcntal Evulttufiorts Kra terResources Land Use Impact Statements Pre-planning e ■ ,:pesi99ofessionals, inc. civil engineers • planners • surveyors ■ January 8, 1990 James A. Lombardi, Chairman, Inland Wetlands LA OS Mks loN Agency/Conservation Commission4 � pN coca Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Capuano/Governor 's Square Application #89-87P Dear Mr. Lombardi, At the last meeting of the IWA/CC, the wetlands commission requested more information regarding the expected viabiltiy of the proposed• wetland creation area at detention basina #2, and the anticipated impacts of the proposed swale system on the ground water table. Design Professionals has been conducting some tesing in this regard during the design process. Hopefully, we may answer your questions to your satisfaction. observation wells were installed at the site of the proposed detention basin #2 on September 14, 1989. The groundwater level was monitored at these locations, as well as the depth of water in the nearby Swale. The purpose of these observations was to assess the impact of the excavation of the basin on the groundwater, and to anticipate the performance of the basin as a wetland. Permeability testing was also conducted. The observation period took place at the end of summer, when the water table typically begins to rise. It was found that the groundwater is being introduced into the Swale, althogh during dry periods the reverse may be true. The swale has a large influence only on the area immediately adjoining its banks. The fringe area, roughly from 30' out to about 15019 experiences a slight to negligible lowering of the ground water table. 1170 Ellington Road (Route 30), South Windsor, CT 06074 0 (203) 291-8755 January B, 1990 The swale system under study has not been noted to have been dry during the the study period. No one familiar with these swales can remember them to be dry at any time since the swales were constructed. It has been recommended to the owners by Design Professionals to constuct the proposed detention basin down to a level at or below the elevation of the bottom of the swale. This will take advantage of a fairly reliable source of water for the wetland species. Sin rel Steven R. Colbath Engineering Manager ■ ■ ,design rofeSsionals, inc. civil engineers . planners . surveyors 1170 ( S Route 30 Ellington Road ),South Windsor, CT 06074 • 9 (203) 291-8755 o ` ----_-------------------------------------------------------------ii/�--_��`\ sell 0 mop 10 -------------- * &OYEzN00.S S QuAt;: G2Avnp wjvTr-iz coniornoNS SCAL4: ?EST Pr'f 6r ry1oN RI a, WELL ■ TE sr v�r i . (203) 291-8755 WETI—ANS, L.IN� esign rof essionals, inc. _ civil engineers • planners • surveyors -66.0_6 .:5'?C? '.V 3C CUT do :UT EXISTING STORM MANHOLE- FL-64.8 + SEE NOTE / \ ���j` FL-56.93 CLII� 8 PROPOSE _.=� } BASIN T STR ONI — '+��. - IS LIAIL TLET STRUC �•�`>SO. 12" �` L�:.�KE�. `�`1 \\, _ �T'lit \ km s4. 113 X72i TOTAL. 4pDX7W .\ _ ��\ 9011,39, T _ 00.68; asz ^ 1 TIo X 7 \ L s' 314.84' 4 _ 29. 9 W \�.� E7aSMNG TREE LINE-\ - LED, � \, < • 11 IRON PIN TO BE SET • EXISTING IRON PIN MONUMENT TO BE SET • EXISTING MONUMENT " h= EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND PIPE ` --�" EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE AND PIPE PROPOSED TREE LINE - __ E)C(STING WATER MAIN AND HYDRANT X 2D7.3 EXISTING SPOT GRADE / ——70—— EXISTING CONTOUR AND ELEVATION N/F ' — PROPOSED CONTOUR AND ELEVATION FRITO—LAY, Inc. x f EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING LIGHT LIMITS OF INLAND WETLANDS ! ENO Cu �HITap.W�jy— LOG ATOtJ AND NQ, X 7LL \ 291-8755 PROJECT T171E _ &esig , Gav ERNODO no#essi orals, Inc. SGU ACRE :ivii engineers oiannens . surveyors BUSINM CM _.iinc:_ ^cc ^u:e _... to,.. .vincsor. ^.ec• ._, .__-.., _ i1��►7►7 - ^_PFFS. :CU-u GQONN9 W*TNt 1,gvr.� GWT A : o$s!¢(tvgfl 9 Z1-S�j 3 /DO ~ 0/ irvrcuE,✓cE '!1 11. df rPOTf�rf E►" oC ca,w. ��.w MoN�T(7� W;Lt- MOIJI-m. Wet.#- 74 , A-2 A-1 *0000 72 - k 1 it To?Sod a_ ice` 70 FQfie w,AT8Q J /u Sw, _ . - _ --•.._ ` _ - - �vJT tT ot;vt $c Sord 7ja sow& cos�t�iaysa w•ik Fie ox;ales f � U rya '� GoAiiQ t-T fir• �i4 ! .• nand cr.o 9rone.� 62 ' S o t L- ACT IE w Sr I N fr SW*LE. , IN A?,-=A OF PeoPO&ED DxTEN-MON Q-AS)N lot H Mom lit = 5� vb0.T A/0 fa '��i 1 vl %�/ !!r^ i%n�^.a�_. oT Sw�e ri w! 14r,� 3v ' o r /-,,'.; C iL _ :�f �'•fa ��:1� �w �I %C �'J. �U�e d/S!J j � 1/G/;.I 0,0- A/JJ/i rc pia//^:r /^�— Y - (203) 291-875s PROJLch' N0.__..86 &es'gn ,. toCA�roNL Gov. ,,4-g r. Ofessionaw I -• ! net TESTiNq By. SRC 1170 ellington Mood (oluter30), eofutf�� wlndeoraut"Yors necticu! 06074 .-----_ UDSERVA'I'IUN F'1'r NU. — LV'1' NO r1r, de-w,-k SOIL PROFILL DEPTH FR0 TO DESCRIhTioN 0 o i --`..�.-- --�.— Lt. Orate L se 6�'6 gown Sa.�eQ 1 doses a re LFDCE: /lar p VOTT"Ha�-- --_Ion —HATER: 7' --------- NOTES a-,ji,iii s i s r- HOOTS- SL ' .se .s9n�/a ,brit - oNsENYA'rtoN err No. A-2 LU NO_ �e�a.-� �asri� 2 SOII. PROFII.R DEPTH 'r RO 0 DRSCRIPTiON lip --- —2 Ly, a,- 6mw —--- i 77 �� v�0 rr NJ19 s7H .SD/llt Co4rSe q �. t �rpu/ S '00 ef rAve.P l,l:b(3R one ROTTl a• I'd" NOTL9�cO4ne ,� `'�----;,11ArBR:— /� ROOTS. f (203) 291-8755 PROJFC'C 11 6 - I 2 ealgn LOCA170N•Gu._SQu,+ --�. DATE• q-�4-� . oi`esslonals! inc, .. _�._ � . TEST[11© CIVII s 1170 ellln9ton food (route r30). south Piott, • wlndeor� conne ticut 08074 OBSERVATION PIT No. f�-7 L0'I� NO S Nfe�urvoyate ��� S`e e pr� SOIL PROFILE VsPTlt FROit TO DESCRIPTION D " -r - L1�bGE� /Ioxe OTT NO• - ------- N r : -o ATER - oTEs 7` si Avatcr .—' Roots• OBSnYA'rioN PIT No, SOIL PROFlI.R LOT NO DEPTH b89CRiPTI0f1 NorLs:_ -- HATER' RooTsL_ �towN sE7 O r 70wno-ps-oud, R•co �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �'�w AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 10, 1990 Paul Capuano Capuano Builders & Developers 1208 Cromwell Avenue Rocky Hill, CT 06067 Dear Mr. Capuano: Re: Application #89-86P - Governors Square Business Center Building E,F,G,H At the January 8, 1990 meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with modifications Application #89-86P - IWA/CC permit for the construction of industrial buildings on property located on the southerly side of Governors Highway and easterly side of Nutmeg Road South, IP zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals dated May 9, 1989 and revised August 18, 1989, Job #86-142. 1• Two blueprint copies of the entire set of plans and 'this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission . This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. 2• Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4 • The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on January 8, 1991. 5 • We recommend a bond in the amount of $5,000.00 to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. 6• All approvals required must . be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 7 • A contact person shall be identified directly on the plans. Mr. Paul Capuano Page Two January 10, 1990 Application #89-86P 8. The plans shall indicate that existing pavement which is "to be removed" shall be taken to an approved bulky waste site. 9. The temporary crossings for the haul road shall be removed, and the areas restored to their original conditions, prior to the release of the erosion and sedimentation bond. 10. The wet meadow mix, indicated on sheet 5 of 9, shall be detailed on the plans in accordance with the recommendations in the report from Penelope C. Sharp, Environmental Consultant. Very truly yours, James A. Lombardi, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission JAL/pmm cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Marcia A.Banach, Director of Planning John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Planning & Zoning Commission Design Professionals, Inc. S p•11N dE, H Y .1 U ale soak 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Ql��Soe•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 30 March 1990 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 1170 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: re: Appl. #89-86P, Governor's Square Buildings E, F, G, H Southerly of Governor's Hwy. ; easterly of Nutmeg Rd. So. We are pleased to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 27, 1990 to approve the above-referenced application for a site plan of development in accordance with Drawings #1-9 dated 10/4/89 (last rev. 2/6/90) prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. , Proj . No. 86-142; Architectural drawings dated 3/24/89 prepared by John Eberle; and Landscaping plan dated 3-9-90 prepared by CR3; and with the following modifications: 1 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2• 1 No building permits will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's Office. 3 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $5,000. 4 • An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of ' Occupancy per Section 4.13 .10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5 . Footing drains are required if the building has a basement. 6 • A landscape bond in the amount of $10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars . 7 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8• Operation & Maintenance Plan must be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Engineering Department. Mr. Peter DeMallie -2- 30 March 1990 9 . Demonstrate that the buffer meets the requirements of Section 5..4c (showing buffer as projected at 5 years and at maturity) . Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets #2, 3, and 4 with . the above modifications, together with four blueprint copies of the entire set of plans, must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within 90 days. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Loui a C. Evans Chairman cc: and Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission M. Banach, Planning Director J. Collins, Chief Building Official J. Iazzetta, Town Engineer F. Shaw, Supt. of Pollution Control E. Belleville, Assessor W. Lanning, Fire Marshal Registrar of Voters Engineer Applicant PZC File ■ ,?esigoofessionals, inc. ■ civil engineers • planners • surveyors December 12, 199C� ■ Phyllis M. Mann Recordinq Secretary, IWA/CC 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor , CT 06074 Dear Mrs. Mann Pe: Governors Square Business Center Applications. # 89-87P and(-# 89-86F' Building O L Buildings E.F7 .H Our client, Capuano Builders and Developers, requests placement on the January 14, 1991 agenda of the IWA/CC, for renewal of IWA/CC permits granted January 8, 1990. A $50.00 check: is enclosed for renewal of applications # 89-87P and #89-86P (required fee of $25.00 per application) . No activity, except for tree clearing in the area of Building 'O' has commenced, hence we will not plan on attending the 1/14/91 meeting, unless requested otherwise. Thank you. Sincerely, A ` Stephen R. Biancardi Design Professionals, Inc. cc; Paul Capuano Irwin S. Hausman 1170 Ellington Road (Route 30), So W Windsor, CT 06074 • (203) 291-8755 1 MOWN SF'� O F .T 7-0 L.v/ ` O-P sio� V&U&ot m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 4 Pw llosoR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 30, 1991 Stephen R. Biancardi Design Professionals, Inc. 4 41 C Governor's Highway South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Biancardi: Re: Application 89-86P - Governor's Square Business Center Building E, P, G, and H At the January 28, 1991 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved a one year extension of Application #89-86P with all original and standard conditions. Application #89-86P becomes effective January 8, 1991 and expires on January 8, 1992. ery t 1y yours, y11is Mann, Recording Secretary Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Planning & Zoning Commission Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer Enclosure