Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance (796) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Application# APPLICATIONFOR Date ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Receipt# q`1 3 IMPORTANT.- This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second Thursday of the preceding month to insure being heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEMS MUST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. 1. The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate,typed or printed in ink. 2. A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application showing streets, lot lines,building lines,zone boundary lines,dimensions, and buildings present or proposed and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from subject property. 3. If a variance is being requested,a legal description and deed of the property must be submitted with the application. This description can be obtained from the land records. 4. The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed.on the property at least 10 days prior to the public 4earing in a location visible from all abutting streets. I , • The applicant,or a representative must be present for the public hearing. The time,date and place of the hearing will be advised.bymaiL • Inquiries on this application maybe directed to the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. 5. No application shall be a complete application unless it shall be in such form and contain such information as necessary for a fair determination of the issues. Incomplete applications may be denied. i. Applicant:. by, UY r tit�_re> 2. Mailing Address: f i. 0-7 3. Telephone#: z(0 0- ?mac' 4. Owner of record of property in question: 5. Location of property in question: r' ? F-4( olk 70 J-tl W, -7T 0 6 0-7 el Assessor's Map# Parcel# / S Zone - 6. Is applicant a corporation or o partnership? (If corpo tion, submit a list of officers. If co- artnership, submit a list of owners). , t-rP,e ►� r• _ 7. Please indicate if the applicant is owner,lessee, or prospective tenant: OW 8. Chec ne of the following: mod'( _Request^Variance to Section S 3 of the Zoning Regulations to allow ptti �,'I�a t► ( ) State hearing under Section of the General Statutes for /(,7/1 ( ) An appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving ��- 9."Is this a request for a sign variance? If yes,complete and submit the sign checklist information. 10.If application is for a v71f . toSection 3.12, are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area, (500 feet)? YES or yes,submit a list of liquor outlets,their locations and distances from the property in question. 11.Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? A) l7 12.Is this property within the Connecticut Water Aquifer area? Yes or(5 If applicationyes must be filed with the Connecticut Water Company by the applicant. ' 13.If requesting a variance state clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty on the property that prompts this application and indicate why other options are unacceptable. Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary. --------------------- I hereby declare that the data&information.contained herein is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Dated this_ �?� `' day of Year ?,00 5­ Applicant: ( igna ) OWNER: 4;1gna e) Approved: �l l ='Denied: Revised 12/04/98 Attachment to application for Zoning Board of Appeals 1169 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT Response for Question #13: The proposed property has an existing building converted to a small office use since approval by the Town of South Windsor on August 22, 1972, by the previous owner. The current owner wishes to expand the building to allow the building to be his principal dental practice. The current site meets all requirements of the overlay zone except it exceeds the maximum site coverage and the existing rear paving line allows only a 8' to 10' buffer at the property linem when a minimum of 10' is required. The goal of the property owner is to move the current curb cut to Ellington Road to the west end of the property to allow two-way traffic and appropriate highway sight lines. Current paving on the site exceeds that required by the existing building and without the proposed 9 reserved future parking spaces would meet the projected needs of the new practice. The expansion of the building if allowed, would provide the owner the financial means to rebuild existing parking lot, create a new curb cut and fully comply with current city engineering standards for site development. If the applied variances are allowed the owner will be able to redevelop the current existing property as a compliment to the development on the opposite (north side) of Ellington Road and provide a state of the art dental facility in an appropriate location in the Town of South Windsor. The redevlopment will remedy existing conditions relative to site access and drainage of the existing parking lot of 34 spaces. Hardship is created by the fact that existing condition of the site does not allow both effective site redevelopment and conformity in all aspects to the applicable zoning regulations at the same time. STATUTORY FORM WARRANTY DEED I, RICHARD GRIGORIAN, of the Town of South Windsor, State of Connecticut for the consideration of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND ($350,000.00) DOLLARS grant to 1169 ELLINGTON ROAD, LLC, of South Windsor, Connecticut and with WARRANTY COVENANTS All that certain piece or parcel of land, with the buildings thereon, located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a pin located in the southerly side of the highway known as Ellington Road and marking the northeasterly corner of property now or formerly owned by John Rustik, et al, and the northwesterly corner of the premises herein conveyed; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the southerly side of said Ellington Road 200 feet to an iron pipe; then by interior angle of 850 27' southerly along other land now or formerly of C.R. Burr and Company, Incorporated, a distance of 150.48 feet to a point; thence by interior angle of 940 33' westerly along other land now or formerly of C.R. Burr and Company, Incorporated, a distance of 217.13 feet to a point; thence by interior angle of 790 02' northerly along land now or formerly of John Rustik, et al, a distance of 152.80 feet to the point of beginning, the last described and the first described line forming an interior angle of 1000 581 . Said premises are subject to building lines, if established, all laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, including building and zoning ordinances affecting said premises, and taxes due the Town of South Windsor. Signed this 16t" day of November, 2004. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantors have caused this deed to be executed on this 16"' day of November, 2004. Witn d b I H "— AN �`' • C STATE OF CONNECTICUT ss. South Windsor November 16, 2004 COUNTY OF HARTFORD Personally Appeared Richard Grigorian signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed, befo e. od oc III C mmissi ner of he Superior Court Grantees Mailing Address: 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 0607 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS August 24, 1972 CERTIFIED MAIL Xrr. Richard Grigorian c/o Edwin A. Lassman 111 Pearl Street Hartford, Connecticut Dear Fir• Grigorian: 2-fAl A 2 �i ■i r r+�r■nr. This is to notify you that your application to the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals, requesting a variance of Section 4»3 to allow conversion of a two-family house to office use on premises known as 1169 Ellington Road, has been granted as follows. The board voted to grant Appeal , 902 for a variance of Section 4.3 to allow the conversion of an existing two- family building into a building for office use as described at the public hearing, the basis for this action being that the character of the neighbor2iood has changed to a degree that now makes the highest and beat use of the subject property much greater than the use it is presently being put to. The building is to be designed as shown and to be used as outlined at the public hearings i.e., the applicant is to be the occupant of approximately one-half of the building. Section 4.11 of the Zoning Regulation shall be adhered to to the satisfaction of the Town Engineering and Building Departments. The effective date of this action is September 5, 1972s Very truly yours, Wilfred UR Boucher Chairman WOB i sre MW of ZONING' BOiiED OF APPEALS South Windsor ' own Hall tures August 22, 1972 00 p.m. der- es;,e.i`>°i Ih' .rF.ESENT: .`Messrs.. R. Mlyette, �'. deal. (alternate fair d R. arren) F. Pierce R. Eriksson (alternate for R. Clinton) be and it� . Bn;ucher, Ghairman is APPLICATION ION #200 - Elliott Elmore, 454 Ellington =oad, South Windsor, bequests an appeal. from the Building Inspector's decision involving use of p remisea as retail. store including sale and service of power 72 equipment on premises known as 454 Ellington Road. RG zone AP,PLIC ATION 1901 - Charles' and }Mary Gudnaitis, 1170 1vain Street, ©uth °Undsr, request a variance of Section j.2 to .allow the- sale of farm hared leaving a house lot with less than minimum frontage and area on premises known as 1170 Main Street. k-40 zone - A letter from Atty. James H. Throwe requesting taut the Public Hearing on these two applications be postponed until the regular September meeting as he could not be present on August 22, was read into the record. Since there was no objection from the Board or the audien-ce, Mr. Boucher said Applications #900 and ",901 would be heard at the September meeting as requested. APPLIG ATi.ON L02 - Richard Grigorian, c/o Edwin A. Uassr::;an, Ill Pearl. St. ,Hartford, requests a variance of Section 4-3 to allow conversion of a two-family house to office use on premises known as 1169 Ellington Road. A-20 zone Atty. Edwin Lassman represented Pr. Grigorian, owner of the premises in question. It consists of a building and land with 200 feet of - frontage on Ellington Road and 150 feet of depth, directly across from Firehouse #l. Since: the previous appeals to the Board, changes have occurred in the neighborhood. Sanitary sewer construe;ion has been approved by the Sewer Commission to the land on Ellington Road owned by ITT; where an apartment complex is under way. Mr. Lassman said the area includes the firehouse and garage- owned by the town across the road, and to the ease will be several hundred apartment units. The Podunk 14ill restaurant -is a short distance down Ellington lioad. The apartment area will eventually extend and surround this property to the east and south. The applicant is asking for a variance to convert this existing two- family building to professional office use. =V=r. Lassman pointed out that in an A-20 zone, a professional office is allowed in conjunction with a residence. Yr. Grigorian proposes to use both floors as offices. He would reconstruct a portion of the building to improve its appearance ; this would be a general improvement in the neighborhood. He would connect to the water and sewer service. '{ir. Lassman said it did not make sense to spend money on -this building and leave it as it is , a two family residence. I4ir. Grigorian said the present building; is very unsightly. He s; proposes no radical changes to the structure, and this will be an CD r .1340 " asset to the area when completed. With the new apartment conutruc- ti.on and new i'amilies in town, he felt this building could provide t owfice space for necessary services. He would occupy the first: y n. d floor, approximately 1100 square feet for his own business, incur- � t arse and investments, and the second floor would he sublet to allied 2 ir-Irs, i.e an attorney, accounting, firm, real estate organizations. Mir. Grigori�n said this change would add to the tag: revenue for the town and allow him to locate his office in the town where he lives � and in tho area where mucai oT. his business is. He presented an =: l a:rchiteet's rendering of the renovated building. The reconstruction would not involve any addition to the structure, but would consist. of nev, wi.ndows, air conditioning, rev., roof, sandblasting the c exterior and cha:n€i n; the front; parch. The proposed plot plan � presented to she hoard shows eight. parking spaces., all to the rear =x � of the building. lvir. Lassman said they considered this adequate for the type of business intended. i•'Ir. Grig-orian said he had only x one clerical em-loy ee and himself it his business. "r. Iassman pointed out that there is a. piece of property owned by Savin between Gri-oriants property and the ITT apartments. It has = C been zoned for .apartments, but, site, plan approval has not yet been given . The house on the other side of the property is about 50 t .feet away from the building in question. There was no,one speaking j in f'a.vor of or in opposition to this appeal, v.ro ijoucher asked vmat, .changes had tak-en glace Since the appeal was t denied b-z the Board in 1,,ay 1971, since the -sewers and the apartment complex were planned at that tire. 14 r. ya.ssman said the construction o f 200 ap artruents would. change the character of the nei ghborhooda '_Iy ;I He pointed out that this is not a commercial enterprise, only a limited commercial operation, and these one or two roan offices would �.r not change the appearance of the building except to improve .i.t. r, Since the appeal was denied, 1'4r. Gri ;orian has operated the property c . s as a landlord. s E r. G� �' :1h • tl exists in town �.it;;orian _felt the office; space .��i�.ch presently . w1i11 be totally inadequate to handle the number of people wno will be moving in. He said the sign shown on the drawing was just the { architeetts rendering and did not have to exist. APPLICATION f90,-� .- iionsanto Cc;m ercial Products Co. , 101 Granby f �3 atreet, BloomMl.d, requests a variance of Section 4.7,2.7, item (a), D a to allow a building less than 1,000 feet from ,a residence or rural. district on prem w ises known as General cigar farm, Rye Street, more clearly described on a map on file. l' zone : 1 Atty. Edwin hassman represented i°F onsanto. he said the request is E for a variance of the portion of the Zoning =,egulations which requires that in an industrial zone, any type of use connected with 3 j the manufacture of alcohol., plastics and certain chemicals cannot �.r. be located V:Yithin 1,000 feet of a residential or rural residential zone. 1•1onsanto has an option to purchase 28 acres located at the . intersection of Rye Street and Troy Hoad. The proposed use is to q` 3 manufacture plastic bottles with a private process that iv-aonsanto Chem:i.ca.l has. r=, 77 1343 standard extruder, This substance will burn life any other plastic but lie did not envision coming close to the Flash point. There wi:li Y: be water' sprinkling on it all the t r��e d it _does riot give out any gases when burned, it is similar to burning wood. The bottles can !� be recycled. Pir. Iv.ueller did not expect trues traffic to use Troy Road as FYe treet would give them direct access to ullivan Avenue and the area highways. Iy r. Lassman said the hardship here is that if the 1,000 foot require- ment is applied, only 1.7 acres of land is available for building, and the type of plastic they are working with is not that anticipated by the restrictions in the Zoning Regulations. I'_r. a1erce moved that, the hoard go into executive session. 'lie motion was seconded by Mr. Neal and unanimously approved. AR12 ;cat ion #20 hard uri;-::orian i iIr. Boucher said requests for this same variance had been denied by j the hoard in April 1970 and Play 1971. The hoard would have to e decide if there was sufficient change in -he circumstances to reconsider the appeal. Tin. LassmLn had said the cis::.-,ges were that the apartment complex is now under way, sanitary, seta;ers have been approve and s'_r. Gri gorian has operated the property as a landlord. 1,.r. Boucher reviewed the minutes of the previous hearings. g The Board discussed whether .to reconsider the appeal, covering the questions of vihether the actual apartment construc-ion and sewer n F approval constituted a change. the facts that the ;roposed he 1 renovations will be an improvement, and the use will not be a traffic hazard and would be pe nitted if Mr. Grigorian lived here ng him-self were also considered. Kr. Neal moved that the situation has not -materially changed and we should not rehear the appeal. There was no second to the motion and it was lost. to IVir. Boucher said that there being no second to the previous motion, tg { the board would consider the application as it aias presented. J. to Mr. Neal said he agreed it would be an improvv...ent to the property and the neighborhood, but the fact that the same request had been aid denied twice before bothered him. iir. Eriksson felt there had been a sufficient change between the 2+� tir. of the first and second appeals to warrant granting the variance. Letting 14r. Grigorian improve the building and run a business from it would not be .offensive and would he a better use of the land. F FJEiv �. ^by V r. Boucher said that -r. Grigorzan had purchased the property after the first appeal had been denied, so that he knew what the situation was. Al . Fierce moved that we grant Appeal 902 for a variance of Section � 4-3 to allow the conversion of an existing two -family building into I; V7- a. building for office use as described at the public hearing, the basis for this motion being that the character of the neighborhood f has changed to a degree that now makes the highest, and best use of ? the subject property much greater than the use it is presently i being put to. The building is to be designed as shown and to be y t used as outlined at the public hearing; i.e. the applicant is to y. t be the occupant of approximately one--half of the building. � n, Section 4.11 of the Zoning -Regulations of the 'Town of South Windsor shall be adhered to to the satisfaction of the Town Engineering and Building Departments. Kr. Plyette seconded the motion. hll in favor, none opposed. It was a unanimous vote. and so ordered. EFFECTIVE:' DATL: September 5, 1972 Application #903 Monsantci Commercial Products Co. Mr. Eriksson said he had gone to see the property* and would not be against granting the variance with the condition that the treed area be left untouched as it makes a_ good barrier. He felts that ;,.here would be employee traffic from the plant on rA oy Road, but it could be controlled. ,r. Neal Felt they had not shown a hardship. if the "oning Regula- tions did not say what they meant, .-onsanto should go back to tho FZC a.r?d have them clarified. lir. Boucher pointed out that the regulations did not prohibit the operation, but applied the 1,000 foot restriction to it. It was brought out that while they would not be manufacturing plastic here, they would be storing raw material and bottles, and there would be a. degree of hazard, but it was a much milder ford of hazard. �. Mr. Eri.ksson said that with the treed areas on the property, they would be left with a small triangle from the whole niece if they had to observe the 1,000 foot restriction. stir: meal st- l env they ha& no hardship] and -here is a lot of more suitable industrial property available in town. U','r. Boucher pointed out that they could put something 7 n th er e that � is more objectionable in nature i;Tithout a. variance since the Land is zoned indusvri.ul . Ile said this parcel cof Land has been -approved Yon t ;.i.s a e by he PZC, so -hat in their interpretation - this is �? not in gross violation of the regulations. i=ar. Pierce said thS will add to the tah. revenue and jobs n vOyJYI .: He favored the appeal iJith the provision that the 200 foot area remain idle, with no access through i.t, with �hL present buildings on it to be demolished. =ir. Myette agreed that he'natural buffer zone of trees should be retained. z r. Pierce noved that we grant Appeal 903 -for a variance of r Section 4.7.2.7 (a) of 00 feet, plus or Minus, because of the a ues ion of where the zone line changes, viit.h the provision that the 200 feet of treed area on tlz- east side of the property, as presented by l Iorsan-o and: their- representat;ive;, remain intact t • �LL/Nr TON �oAD �IZOrJ7'E 3a> '0 88 Zoo ' 010 O o ez 7/ p: Jo3.4CHd � � 0 6'ti ; s �• ILI errand¢11%,loc. T Ta +% R ' t• .. It 2/7./3� dvY R.ot.tty i J>' VO N/F 1��'lSTorvC OC-' C&dPkjENT Co,2.Pa12 AT/ati/ nllllppAtlIJUUU/d/U • 0��1t�n F C t7 Aj H,p9� 14, 5.w, Z,H.A. APPEAL TO ` ~� No.5032 �� G20s75 o-r?cp r7ez:q�=' 2755 U 5 C r Cx 5 0/1 ra M q�RNU SUR�E�09- 4� -----------�.. SITE DEVELOpmc-7 ` r I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS MAP TO Fog BE SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT AND' IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLASS D �'tCt� rt� C�/�/C-�p��f1!Y CODE OF CONN. TECHNICAL COUNCIL; INC. 4 LL1Nk-�70N P,040 Sa.unj •oc�, r r f T�JO ro�7 CGNTorJ A)-ret'UAI- r...._ .J. C4,CR114 a�roN L. ' 1169 EUJNGTON ROAD,LW 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT 06074 860-289-4955 September 13,2005 Property Owners Mill Pond Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 1169 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Board of Appeals,you are hereby notified that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours at 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT and is subject to a hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. All members of the public are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard please contact the South Windsor Planning Department, 860-644-2511, ext253. Sincerely, Dr. Gregory B. Haroian 1169 Ellington Road, LLC-Owner , R 1169 ELUNGTON ROAD,LW 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT 06074 860-289-4955 September 13, 2005 Strawbridge Condo Association Mill Pond Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 1169 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Board of Appeals,you are hereby notified that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours at 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT and is subject to a hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. All members of the public are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard please contact the South Windsor Planning Department, 860-644-2511, ext253. Sincerely, Dr. Gregory B. Haroian 1169 Ellington Road, LLC-Owner 1169 EL UNGTON ROAD,UC 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT 06074 860-289-4955 September 12,2005 Michael Johnson 1153 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 1169 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Sir: In accordance with Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Board of Appeals,you are hereby notified that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours at 1169 Ellington Road,South Windsor,CT and is subject to a hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. All members of the public are invited to the hearing to ask questions and/or give comments. You may also submit written comments regarding prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard please contact the South Windsor Planning Department, 860-644-2511, ext 253. Sincerely, Dr. Gregory B. Haroian 1169 Ellington Road, LLC-Owner �v Mom— �\ Ui U Z Town of South Windsor N CONDOS Connecticut General Map 1169 Ellington Road 0 PARCELS Date Printed: September 29,2005 ROAD NAMES 0 200 Feet Property boundaries are derived from the Town of South Windsor Tax Assessor maps,digitized at a scale of 1 inch=100 feet,and include the same data limitations and disclaimer as the Assessors maps. All other data portrayed is representation only and,due to inherent mapping limitations,should be used as a guide only. The intent of this map is to present a graphical representation of property boundarie' and selected data,and the map is subject to change as more accurate surveys may disclose. Property boundaries mapped as of June 4,2001. <OW N Se O F To� o-P Soat ?d&uaot .G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR•co4�; AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 14, 2005 CERTIFIED #70020460000197444415 Dr. Gregory Haroian 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE. Application #2661-05—Dr. Gregory Haroian, 1169 Ellington Road,A-20 zone Dear Dr. Haroian: At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 3, 2005, the Board approved your request for two variances: 1) a 2' variance to section 5.6.3e to allow for an 8' buffer(10' required), and 2) a 13.2% variance to section 5.6.3i to allow 53.2% impervious coverage (40% allowed)for property located at 1169 Ellington Road, A-20 zone. The Board concluded the hardship to be that the inability to meet the parking requirements without this variance. The Board placed the following conditions on this application: 1. Site plan approval is required. 2. In the event that parking spaces 3543 (shown as reserved spaces on the plans) are constructed, they must use a a-pervious surface in their construction. 3. The existing buffer to the west of the building must be maintained. Any new building, or alteration/additions to existing buildings, requires a building permit prior to start of construction. These actions are effective upon your filing the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's Office at your own expense. Very truly yours, tepherf Wagner, Chairpert6on Zoning Board of Appeals SW:dr cc: Building Department I, Stephen Wagner, Chairman of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals hereby certify that on November 3, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to: Dr. Gregory Haroian, two variances: 1) a 2' variance to section 5.6.3e to allow for an 8' buffer(10' required), and 2) a 13.2% variance to section 5.6.3i to allow 53.2% impervious coverage (40% allowed), A- 20 zone. Conditions: 1) Site plan approval is required; 2) In the event that parking spaces 35-43 (shown as reserved spaces on the plans) are constructed, they must use a non- pervious surface in their construction; and 3) The existing buffer to the west of the building must be maintained. on premises located: 1169 Ellington Road and more particularly bounded and described as follows: SEE ATTACHED OWNER OF RECORD: 1169 Ellington Road LLC Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 14th day of November, 2005. r tephen Wagner, Chai erson PUBLIC ACT#75-317 Received for Record this day of 2005 At VOLUME PAGE TOWN CLERK STATUTORY FORM WARRANTY DEED I, RICHARD GRIGORIAN, of the Town of South Windsor, State of Connecticut for the _consideration of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND ($350,000.00) DOLLARS grant to 1169 ELLINGTON ROAD, LLC, of South Windsor, Connecticut and with WARRANTY COVENANTS All that certain piece or parcel of land, with the buildings thereon, located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a pin located in the southerly side of the highway known as Ellington Road and marking the northeasterly comer of property now or formerly owned by John Rustik, et al, and the northwesterly comer of the premises herein conveyed; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the southerly side of said Ellington Road 200 feet to an iron pipe; then by interior angle of 850 27' southerly along other land now or formerly of C.R. Burr and Company, Incorporated, a distance of 150.48 feet to a point; thence by interior angle of 940 33' westerly along other land now or formerly of C.R. Burr and Company, Incorporated, a distance of 217.13 feet to a point; thence by interior angle of 790 02' northerly along land now or formerly,of John Rustik, et al, a distance of 152.80 feet to the point of beginning, the last described and the first described line forming an interior angle of 1000 58'. Said premises are subject to building lines, if established, all laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, including building and zoning ordinances affecting said premises, and taxes due the Town of South Windsor. Signed this 16t' day of November, 2004. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantors have caused this deed to be III executed on this 16t' day of November, 2004. Witn d b X'v h G✓106 rr k.-M RI CHARD GRIGORIAN The ABC Group LLC 165 RIVER ROAD SUITE 3 MLLINGTON, CT 06279 #� s� s 'r a RE9., 0U r Y'VI,r cn q � P- LAINtl,!�!�nr. October 6, 2005 Town of South Windsor Re: Application by 1169 Ellington Rd LLC To the Town of South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals: The Strawbridge Association Inc. is an abutting property owner of 1169 Ellington Rd, LLC. We wish to voice our concern with the planned expansion of the building owned by 1169 Ellington Rd, LLC. The Strawbridge property is buffered with berm, white pines and shrubbery, to shield the view of the building and parking areas. It is our main concern that this buffer not be sacrificed, creating an unacceptable condition for the residents of the Strawbridge community in the direct vision line of the building. Another lesser concern is the noise and pollution correlated to the increase in vehicle and pedestrian traffic expected if the h x the proposed expansion occurs. If the present barrier is maintained as is, it would of course have somewhat of a mitigating effect on the noise. Prior to issuing any formal position on the matter we wish to review plans and conduct a field inspection of the proposed changes and otherwise be insured that our concerns are addressed. Thank you. Sincer ly, Ro ert A. rrows, Jr. Property Manager Strawbridge Association, Inc. Telephone: 860-872-8706 Facsimile: 860-429-5725 E mail: bobburrows@charterinternet.com 12 Lp` le WC 5 ' r' a , IA z ` �y_f.�:. fig}, _, r._ •,. ,e .:;:s.-: -::r_. . ..,i�.�.. .,•' .. ,. ,. - : ,:.c.... - --"� ' -" �' •. ,�� _arc. • .__.�,.'. _. ,;;;, ^�3r'.: x, o�>_ � �= �;� _ ., c U,;�-�,�r �" �g �, s ,:��,yam �_ �S��" �,�•� — _ '� ton" 70 At — r t , ' :. , j •n` , r i` �f : �3 s Y � € r NeL � K ' �': '�•1/ e> ems' .. �s�' >r _ ;�, - "_ � j G s 1 t . s a, -e 1 1 11 11 11 Eii