Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance (728) TOWN 01F SOUTH WINDSOR Application# 5,3�)--o 3 APPLICATION FOR Date 6— 1 q—C�2) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Receipt# qDj IMPORTANT.- This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second Thursday of the preceding month to insure being heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEMS MUST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. 1. The application and supplements mu st be fil ed in duplicate, licat e typed or printed in ink. 2. A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application showing streets, lot lines,building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from subject property.- 3. If a variance is being requested, a legal description and deed of the property must be submitted with the application. This description can be obtained from the land records. 4. The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. • The applicant,or a representative must be present for the public hearing. The time, date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. • Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. 5. No application shall be a complete application unless it shall be in such form and contain such information as necessary for a fair determination of the issues. Incomplete applications may be denied. 1. Applicant: Anne T. Keen 2. Mailing Address: 140 Pleasant Val ley Road South Windsor, CT 06074 3. Telephone#: -289-1765 4. Owner of record of property in question: Anne T. Keen 5. Location of property in question: 140 Pleasant Valley Road Assessor's Map# 45 Parcel# 24 Zone A-40 6. Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? (If corporation, submit a list of officers. If co-partnership, submit a list of owners). No ss• 7. Please indicate if the applicant is owner, lessee, or prospective tenant: owner 8. Check one of the following: ( X) Request Variance to Section 1(),2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow 2 lots with reduced lot area (37,251 sa.ft, or 2,749 sq ft variance; 34,612 sa ft. or 5,388 sgi ft variance) and 1 lot with reduced lot depth (175.3 feet or 24.7 fett variance) . ( ) State hearing under Section of the General Statutes for ( ) An appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving 9. Is this a request for a sign variance? If yes, complete and submit the sign checklist information. No 10. If application is for a variance to Section 3.12, are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area, (500 feet)? YES or NO If yes, submit a list of liquor outlets,their locations and distances from the property in question. N/A 11. Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? No 12. Is this property within the Connecticut Water Aquifer area? Yes or No. If yes, application must be filed with the Connecticut Water Company by the applicant. No 13. If requesting a variance state clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty on the property that prompts this application and indicate why other options are unacceptable. Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary. See attached sheet, I hereby declare that the data&information contained herein is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Dated this n day of Year).003 Applicant: (Signature) OWNER: ..� - (Signature) Approved: Denied: Revised 12/04/98 Narrative Statement Variance Application Anne T. Keen 140 Pleasant Valley Road South Windsor, Connecticut June 19, 2003 Variances requested: Area requirement for proposed lots 1 and 2 (Lot 1: 37,251 square feet or 2,749 square feet variance;Lot 2: 34,612 square feet or 5,388 square feet variance), and lot depth for lot 1 (175.3 feet, or 24.7 feet variance). The applicant, Anne T. Keen, has resided at 140 Pleasant Valley Road since June 1977. She and her late husband raised four boys at this location, all of whom are now adults. Mrs. Keen is a retired U. S. Postal Service employee, having worked at the Bissell Station post office on Main Street. Mrs. Keen's two-story, four-bedroom brick colonial house with attached two-car garage is situated on the westerly side of the lot in an area clearly framed by large evergreen hedgerows. The parcel also has numerous large trees. Some 65 feet easterly of her house is a mature evergreen hedge of approximately 35 feet in height, which obscures all view to the east. When the deciduous trees are leaf bearing, the proposed Lot 2 is visually obscured from all other lots in the area. The proposed lot sizes for the lot for the existing residence and the lot for the proposed house are slightly undersized for the A-40 zone, however, not inconsistent with lots in the immediate vicinity of their house. This section of Pleasant Valley Road, containing some 32 homes, is characterized by numerous undersized lots, and lots with reduced frontage; in fact, 69%of these lots are either undersized or have lot frontages less than required in the A- 40 zone. The purpose of this application is to enable Mrs. Keen to create a single new building lot. The hardships or peculiar circumstances that support this application are: 1. The proposed Lot 2 is visually separated from the proposed Lot 1 by a mature evergreen hedgerow. 2. Proposed Lot 2 has the full appearance of a building lot, and is framed by hedgerows. 3. Of the 32 house lots on both sides of Pleasant Valley Road in the immediate neighborhood, fully 22 lots, or 69%, are non-conforming to either area or frontage. 4. Of the 32 lots in the immediate neighborhood, 18 lots, or 56%, are short on required lot frontage. 5. Of the 32 lots in the immediate neighborhood, 14 lots, or 43%of the neighborhood lots, are non-conforming to the area requirement in the A-40 zone. 6. Area lot frontages are as little as 53 feet(two lots easterly of proposed Lot 2), and many lots are between 100 feet and 130 feet in width. 7. Proposed Lot 1 for the existing residence and Lot 2 for the proposed residence have over 200 feet of frontage. 8. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 are larger than 3 of the 4 lots immediately to the east of the subject property(34,004 square feet, 19,947 square feet, and 26, 040 square feet). All four of the lots immediately to the east of the subject property are deficient in lot frontage(122 feet, 53 feet, 100 feet and 105 feet). 9. Eleven area lots are smaller than the lot sizes proposed. 10. The existing house is served by public sewer and a well. The proposed house will be served by public sewer and water services. 11. Proposed Lot 2 has the appearance of a large house lot. 12. Given the extensive proposed lot width for Lot 1,the existing residence is some 76 feet from the westerly side property line and some 65 feet from the proposed easterly property line, affording privacy to the residence's occupants and to neighbors. 13. As illustrated on the attached ZBA plan, the proposed house is a full 36 feet from the proposed property line separating it from the existing residence on Lot 1, and it is proposed to be some 100 feet from the property to the east. 14. To the rear of proposed Lots 1 and 2 is a cultivated farm field (N/F Joseph Vibert),which is of odd shape and unlikely to support a future residence behind Lot 2. 15. The brook which forms the easterly property line of the subject tract and proposed Lot 2 continues to the northwest and will likely preclude development of a house lot behind proposed Lot 2. 16. The only way to create a conforming lot depth for proposed Lot 1 is to radically alter the lot lines such that the common property line between Lots 1 and 2 would be roughly parallel to the easterly property line of proposed Lot 2, and not through the vegetative hedgerow which naturally separates proposed Lots 1 and 2. There does not appear to be any other way that a side lot line could measure a full 200 feet for Lot 1. 17. The applicant is relocating to a more appropriate living environment due to health conditions. 18. The property owners to the west and east do not have surplus land area, and it would not be prudent to carve up the large farm field to the north in order to gain additional acreage. 19. Although the tract has insufficient area for 3 lots, with 485 feet of frontage along Pleasant Valley Road,that frontage would normally support 3 building lots. 20. Directly across the street from the subject property are two large farm fields and a tobacco shed. 21. These lots cannot be created unless and until a subdivision application is approved by the Planning&Zoning Commission. 22. The existing house and proposed house meet all zoning setback requirements. 23. A variance, if granted, is peculiar to this parcel, and only to this parcel, and will not undermine the integrity of the zoning regulations. Mrs. Keen appreciates your careful consideration of her application. Thank you. py Volume 224 Page N. 268 FORM I74A CONNECTICUT• WARRANTY DEED SURVIVORSHIP 7uT��♦"•""""" '',��'�,� REV. 6/76 w►� """"'.'—' ai36i Zo all People to P40M t4ese 11resento shall dome, Greeting: �inafu Te, (ghat We, ROBERT H. BOSSEN and BETTE E. BOSSEN, both of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut s-• F for the consideration of SIXTY-NINE THOUSAND and 00/100 ($69,000.00) DOLLARS received to our full satisfaction of CHARLES H. KEEN, JR. and ANNE T. KEEN, both of the said Town of South Windsor do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said CHARLES H. KEEN, JR. and ANNE T. KEEN `} and unto the survivor of them, and unto such survivor's heirs and assigns forever that certain piece or parcel of land, with the buildings thereon, situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Cartford and State or Connec- ,i,` ticut, and more particularly bounded and described as follows, to Witt BEGINNING at a point in the northerly line of Pleasant Valley �j Road, which point is marked by a merestone and is One Thousand One �'� Hundred Twenty-nine and 06/100 (1,129.06) feet easterly from the south 4. ►!:;,_ :j.� east corner of land now or formerly of Horace C. Vibert, as measured y along the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road; thence turning , and forming an interior angle of 90° 00' 00" with the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road and running northerly along land now or t formerly of Emma V. Deane, Eveline V. Nielsen and Frances V. Bossen, m , a distance of One Hundred Seventy-four and 90/100 (174.90) feet to a a point marked by a merestone; thence turning and forming an interior Fg }� angle of 90° 00' 00" with the last described course.and running easterly along land now or formerly of Emma V. Deane et al, a distance of Three Hundred Forty-two (342) feet, more or less, to the center :.# line of a brooks thence turning and running southerly along the center line of said brook and land now or formerly of said Emma V. Deane et g. al, a distance of Two Hundred Twenty-three (223) feet, more or less, to a point in the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road; thence turning and running westerly along the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road, a distance of Four Hundred Eighty-five feet, more or 3f= less, to the point or place of beginning. Said premises are subject to: j1. Any and all provisions of any ordinance, municipal regulation } or public or private law. -- I2. Taxes to the Town of South Windsor on the list of October 1, i 1976, which taxes the grantees herein assume and agree to pay as part consideration for this deed. O90 Con• nce Tax received += I Tcwn Clerk of South Windsor .f P. Town of South Windsor General Map N Connecticut ROAD NAMES Date Printed: June 26,2003 PARCELS � a..a 0 500 Feet Property boundaries are derived from the Town of South Windsor Tax Assessor maps,digitized at a scale of 1 inch=100 feet,and include the same data limitations and disclaimer as the Assessors maps. All other data portrayed is representation only and,due to inherent mapping limitations,should be used as a guide only. The intent of this map is to present a graphical representation of property boundarie and selected data,and the map is subject to change as more accurate surveys may disclose. Property boundaries mapped as of June 4,2001. We, Joseph Vibert, Jr, of 1254 Main Street South Windsor and Edith Vibert, of 808 Main Street own property adjacent to Anne Keen. For personal reasons, we do not wish to sell land to Anne Keen so that she can conform to present Zoning laws. Regardless, we hold no objections to her sub-dividing her property. L'4 Jdieph ibert, Jr Edith Vibert Date: �3 Rpek , AA Elizabeth Clark, of 63 Hollis Road South Windsor, hold no objections to the Zoning Variance appeal Anne Keen has requested: Elizab h Clark Dated: T lej 8 �d��it J .�. ,rT'it/f/� r, v �'J M^/i✓ .��"-T f`� �-.i/rvl./✓S J- l0 Ovnn .e�,�.(R. lib`�' �1 c� at . sv. k► 1-2),Az>sv-/ pqo vu, eta I �c z/ • ram- -7� s lov z y 18f,Z 411 J/ z8 ' S74- 3 Z 0 �� 35�' 63 1 A�z 39 "Olp (e�,s�-n� i i 4,Yloo ZO LN. 9�//Yr.Ei3/ ZO SIJB0I 6Ji /v��.�D�Ofi�T` y St Awl J 0 O y� e � Ile� .� Cd 61 r z "d�,v �3 �:t�`71a 1 /0 1TN1I,E /V,ENS , f z�ic 7� �! 7 re tz. GeD e <� T&�4r�� SO OPZWPH Dk. G� s4Ll� ,57 Z Icl Cl WAi-,) Al �v Xln AY&D �h �rl/ � • rt 4R. 41'q MRS, L®u IJ _ lo�ivTl . 07.E/ 7fv �Eiy S,qN% zL'6'y R' S-014Th (.Jawd..SOR, CT 06 07 %J�`P4oJ,tLLiilAN 4� , _ ✓ !3u,N �TA�L __ o u T h CJ/,Y oIS-OR, C-T, D& 07,el _ _ �� �1 u L � �® i�� a®�3 c'a�vc�i�?�✓�'�V'G � 1�_ ��1•�Nc�,S _ j��R _ _ IVR.S. /leelV, C7 5e O ;21,6' ,SA Al i. 11,4 ZL4'y At) .� h€AeJ I.gNy e°d1�11vx'iv_rs 4AId Sq ppOS-C&y NANy_ AR d s�qar < :awl e is/v l- ,ANY A4,e d s!VO _ 7- _ A44 As TXE y rA6 PROFG O r1c1 f}s 1,C, /44 S�LN _ No w % /� yAN_ % cocas 71 7'11- _ iS,✓.f_ 6-.t7'_ _mil v us _ 7-1 N' T/l,a v , Z�'Tj9 - s ) RL4 L/ � V 9 I fi tOWN Sr 7-0-wn 0-14C IS-11c:W& ?di�� s . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•CO `i AREA CODE 860/644-2511_ July 17, 2003 CERTIFIED#70020510000081151942 Design Professionals, Inc. Attn: Peter DeMallie 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl. #2582-03-Anne T. Keen, 140 Pleasant Valley Road,A-40 zone Dear Mr. DeMallie: At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals held on July 10, 2003,the Board approved your request for three variances to section 10.2: 1)2,749 sq. ft. variance to allow a lot area of 37,251 sq. ft.; 2) a 5,388 sq. ft. variance to allow a lot area of 34,612 sq. ft.; and 3) a 24.7 ft. variance to allow a lot with 175.3 ft. of lot depth, at 140 Pleasant Valley Road,A-40 zone. The Board concluded the hardship to be as follows: The way the original lot was designed created the necessity for a variance. This application is subject to subdivision approval. Any new building, or alteration/additions to existing buildings, requires a building permit prior to start of construction. These actions are effective upon your filing the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's Office at your own expense. Very truly yours, Aee Robert Warren, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals RW:dr cc: Building Department I,Robert Warren, Chairman of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals hereby certify that on July 10, 2003 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to: Anne T. Keen, three variances to section 10.2: 1) 2,749 sq. ft. variance to allow a lot area of 37,251 sq. ft.; 2) a 5,388 sq. ft. variance to allow a lot area of 34,612 sq. ft.; and 3) a 24.7 ft. variance to allow a lot with 175.3 ft. of lot depth,A-40 zone. on premises located: 140 Pleasant Valley Road and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a Point in the northerly line of Pleasant Valley Road, which point is marked by a merestone and is One Thousand One Hundred Twenty-nine and 06/100 (1,129.06) feet easterly from the sou j east corner of land now or formerly of Horace c. Vibert, as measured i along the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road; thence turning and forming an interior angle of 90° 00' 00" with the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road and running northerly along land now or formerly of Emma V. Deane, Eveline V. Nielsen and Frances V. Bossen, a distance of One Hundred Seventy-four and 90/100 (174.90) feet to a Point marked. by�a merestone; thence- turning and forming an interior angle f e o goo 00 00 with the last described co urse.and running 9 easterly a i lop Y g land now or formerly of Emma V. Deane et al, a distance Of Three Hundred Forty-two (342) feet, more or less, to the center line of a brook; thence turnip and runnin g in southerly line of said brook and land now or formerly of aidlE along the center al a distance of TwoEmmaDe ane Hundred Twenty-three (223) feet,. more or less, to a point in the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road, thence turning and running westerly along the northerly line of said Pleasant Valley Road, a distance of Four Hundred Eighty-five feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. OWNER OF RECORD: Anne T.Keen Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 17th day of July, 2003. Robert Warren, Chairperson PUBLIC ACT#75-317 Received for Record this day of 2003 at VOLUME PAGE TOWN CLERK