Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-60P Site Plan of Development TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ' ` APPLICATION FORM Application No: O'T- Coo P RECEIVED Official Receipt Date: ) l L Receipt No: S E P 3 0 2004 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. APPLICANT: SC04 Ck U'6n&rA PROJECT NAME:���1 ADDRESS: ��Y 'Pock-Li i 11 o(60 n-7 �iT Ccr OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: SCO,�k lltonC.XA_ I 100 G{.�1�Ct Q ��c fir. ��tIJT CTdLODI� c%(3�jo I�tp S:�,t t Q do—\ CLve� i— ADDRESS: 711 /3�'i 1. 90 Sk(4'elp (Jr SUii W,ndSScK CT 0%07 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: [OCO,--I006,___(01q 9;x(ii van Oyenue ASSESSOR'S MAP# IDO PARCEL# 3 ZONE 6C NAME, ADDRESS,TEL&FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: A. S 6Ater, De c:r1 I�-a SS;or��r(5 (n ' 1 a Ik, S ll cal �a�. (,(�,nclYUrt �uu CT d loDl `1"P,( &b o 1 n55 rnUC SF'LnO�c�l� �757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Re subdivision ❑ Open Spate Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) X Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 -Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑ Other(explain in detail) An Applica ' sign ' re uired to be posted on the property fo ppli 'ons t n ( } days or to being heard by the Commiss ture of Applicant re of erty Owner ZO ��ca Grq o�iA2 4 rt a I q Z&A'] VOL. 1090PAGE 197 Schedule A That certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut shown as "PARCEL AREA 69,597 sq. ft. 1.59 ac."on a r:ap entitled "PLAN PREPARED FOR Antonio Pacheco,et al SULLIVAN AVENUE. SOUTH WINDSOR. CONNECTICUT SHEET 1/1 design professionals, inc.civil engineers . planners. surveyors 165 south satellite road, south windsor, connecticut 06074 BOUNDARY SURVEY DESIGN:JAL DRAWN: JAL CHECKED: RPM JOB NO.: 96-925 DATE:JULY 3, 1997 DRAWING NO.: D:/JOB/96925/96925-MT', which map is on file in the South Windsor Town -' Clerk's Office for further reference,and is more particularly bounded: Beginning at a point located in the northerly line of Sullivan Avenue at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Rose D. Petraitis; thence running fix. N 680 30' 34" W, 210.09 feet along Sullivan.Avenue to a point;thence running N 110 52' 19" E, 253.79 feet along land now or formerly of Ronald Martin to a point; thence running S 68° 28' 13" E, 368.64 feet along land now or formerly of The Neighborhood DRZ to a point;thence running S 1711 22' 29" W, 107.56 feet along land now or formerly of said The Neighborhood DRZ to a point;thence running N 65e 23' 51" W, 133.66 feet to a point;thence running S 170 49' 33" W, 150.25 feet to the point or place of beginning, said last two courses running along land now or formerly of said Petra'stis. Being all and the same premises conveyed to the Grantors herein by Warrantee Deed of Bank of South Windsor, dated July 15, 1997, and recorded in Volume 955 at Page 68 Of the South Windsor Land Records. Signed this 23rd day of June, 1999. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ��C51- �✓N���� I M. ACHECO - STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. Manchester June 23, 1999 ' COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) # 3+ Personally appeared ANTONIO M. PA ECO and MARIA C. PACHECO, signer and sealer of the foregoi g ins ru ent and acknowledged the same to be their free act a d b fo e 'L-ClurvoVIL 146-Gy Commissioner or the Superior Court Grantee's Address: 110 Lavender Lane 1 Rocky Hill, CT 06067 RECENED FOR RECORD (5(c2 4 19 7(; q AT ia• 35pm - RECOF;OED!N S�;UTN;'JIFJGSDR I r LA-NM-sEXRDS VOL)li90—PAGE I Tq- //II till �U1.DC<<'•4-�� +rcQiOWNCIERP,r7S3lS�K� } S O'NM a�7 co O-Pso-tdA �. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 OR•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 MATTHEW B.GALLIGAN Town Manager Mr. Timothy Wentzell, Chair Commission Members Town of South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission Re: Appl 04-60P, Leonard Site Plan — 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of the Economic Development Commission, EDC, I submit this letter in support of the above application. At its October 27, 2004 meeting the EDC directed Chair Marge Anthony to contact you in this regard. It is the EDC's unanimous opinion that the general concept represented in this application is in the best interests of the Town and its citizens. Redevelopment of existing properties is the most difficult type of economic activity to generate. The above applicant has proposed a high quality mixed-use project that will enhance the viability and visual quality of this high traffic area. Further, the applicant has worked cooperatively and diligently with Town staff to meet regulatory requirements and strategic policy objectives. We strongly encourage the Commission and staff to continue working with this applicant to resolve any remaining issues and ultimately approve the application. The applicant reported to the EDC that this is project has the support of neighboring property owners. A partnership between the applicant and one neighboring property will actually help to reduce curb cuts onto Sullivan Avenue and facilitate a higher and better use for both properties than might otherwise be accomplished. Having demonstrated a commitment to the best interests of our Town and a respect for our regulatory process, the EDC recommends a proactive process to resolve any remaining issues facilitating the approval of this application. Please feel free to contact me with your questions or if you would like additional information. Sincerely, //,� 400-Sii;Ve+t Craig R. Stevenson Economic Development Coordinator y� -1j-� y s y-✓ /ia��y';��/� // �'��.s��j���-�js/ ��''i r��//fi�" �i / /�/� {y -�; y�i .: /i .!i< �`� /� ,//j � �� /s/.� :-i. �y osi ,y�:�� �'>�".Y'/.' -r <,y'.'�- � jam•:•. - �' s�/�� � _j � !.✓��H..<a/� F''i'� ski e s �. - � -� 3,�3�yl>. �-:' / t� II' 4 5 4 4 60 411'.,_1:U4 200 SLI I J1:U . n Enter your TIN in the appropriate box.The TIN provided must match the name given on Line 1 to avoid social security,number backup withholding.For individuals,this is your social security number(SSN).However,for a resident alien,sole proprietor,or disregarded entity,see the Part I instructions on page 3.For other entities,it is your employer identification number(EIN).If you do not have a number,see How to get a TIN on page 3. or Note.If the account is in more than one name,see the chart on page 4 for guidelines on whose number Employer identification number. to enter. 2 6 0_1 0 1.0 1 8 7 1 7 Certfication Under penalties of perjury,I certify that: 1. The number shown on this form is my correct`taxpayer identification number(or I am wafting for a.number to be issued to me),and . 2. 1 am not subject to backup withholding because:(a)I am exempt from backup withholding,.or(b)I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service(1RS)that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends,or(c)the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding,and 3. 1 am a U.S.person(including a U.S.resident alien). Certification instructions.You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup, withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return.For real estate.transactions,item 2 does riot apply.. For mortgage interest paid,acquisition or abandonme cured perty,cancellation of ebt,contributions to an individual retirement arrangement(IRA),and generally,payments oth a eres dividends,you are not uired to sign the Certification;but you must- provide your correct TIN.(Seethe instruct' on ge Sign Signature of Here U.S.. ► / .Dar®►: Purpose of Form A person who is required to file an information return with the • any estate(other than a foreign.estate).or trust. See IRS, must obtain your correct taxpayer identification number Regulation section 301.7701-6(a)for additional information. (rlN)to report,for example, income paid to you, real estate Foreign person:If you are a foreign person, use the transactions,mortgage interest you paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, or appropriate Form W (see For ion.51 Withholding of Al contributions you made to an IRA. Tax on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities). ties). U.S. person.Use Form W=9 only if.you are a U.S. person Nonresident alien who becomes a resident alien. (including a resident alien),to provide your correct TIN to the Generally, only a nonresident alien individual may use the (including requesting it the r ueste and,when applicable,to to: terms of a tax.treaty to reduce or eliminate U.S.tax on p q g ( certain types of income:However,.most tax treaties contain a 1.Certify that the TIN you are giving is correct-(or you.are provision known as a"saving clause-7 Exceptions specified waiting.for a number to be issued), in the saving clause may permit.an exemption from tax to 2. Certify.that you are not subject to backup-withholding, continue-for.certain types of income even.after the recipient or has otherwise become a U.S. resident alien for tax purposes. 3.Claim exemption from backup withholding if you are a 1f you are a U.S: resident alien who is relying on an U.S.exempt payee. exception contained in the saving clause of a tax treaty to Note.If a requester gives you a'forrn other than Form W-9 to claim an exemption.from-U.S.fax on certain types of income, request your TIN,you must use the requester's form if it is you must attach a statement that specifies the following five substantially similar to this Form W-9. items: For federal tax purposes you are considered a person if you 1.The treaty country.-Generally,this must be the same are: treaty under which you claimed exemption from tax as a. • an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United. nonresident alien. States,. 2.The-treaty.article addressing the income. • a partnership, corporation, company, or association 3.The article number(or location) in the tax treaty that created or organized in the United States or under the laws contains the saving clause and'its exceptions.. of the United States, or Cat.No.10231X Form W-9 (Rev.10-2004) Public Water Supply Aquifer Area Project Notification Form Requirement: All applicants before a municipal Planning and Zoning Commission, Inland Wetland Commission or Zoning Board of Appeals for any project located within a public water supply aquifer area are required by Sections 8-31 of the CT General Statutes to notify the affected water utility by certified mail within 7 days of the date of the application. General Information: 1. Location map of the project site (please show enough information to locate site). 2. Site plans including soil erosion and sediment control plan which have been submitted to the town commission for review. 3. Project address. V" I&(o S(A L [, VA t/ A V E soU7'H W/ ND.so0, GT' fd&'f7'If 4. Total acreage of project site /, 59 5. Existing land use (5 P F tJ L g N p VA GA hf T B U I( D l h] G 6. Project description (include propose uses) G O/V 5 F& A GT Z GO M M KCI A L _BUILDIA(GS AIIT-p ALL R, FI ATEp SITE IMPKDVEM wlTS /NGL-UC? / A/4 PA / i G SPA6 ES A6e-E SS 1)PIVE L471L 177E5� L.AIVDSCAP/ A/61 17-E LLIl� HT7A/Gt . . 7. Acreage of are to be disturbed including structures, additions,paving, and soil disturbance J. 5 7 �►.-� s 8. Type of sanitary system(circle one)-septic syste public sewer ther/none 9. Number of existing or proposed floor drain and their point of discharge e.g. sanitary sewer,holding tank, or ground_ /V D ti= 10. Water accessed by(circle one)-private we public water ther/none; If other, please specify 11. Distance of site disturbance to nearest watercourse or wetland To T H E PoDiAm< 91yep, 12. Brief description of existing or proposed stormwater management system, including roof drainage,paved areas etc., and discharge points e.g. municipal sewers, drywells, PA v streams,vegetated areas, detention basins etc. STORM M G M r S V ST-R M rHESURFAC-E# RDoF pL{A►oFF LA/GL(AD6'5 STOR.H 36 WEPU WIAJ PAP.K/Ne, AR.EA_S , kx-l' 8 E RDliT1:DT7` A" P/PEbSTpg.H PkAnQAGE SV� , A BAYS�lau �r 77HE 6AySAVEA, AND pET&NnaJ 'Atq�> A OE FE A TlOIJ M91 Al TO THE (37ATL DRA1AIAeyE SYSTEM VIA AN EX/s7-1AJg CATGH SAS/nl 13. Type of heat for facility Lb GA TE D W(-rJ41 AJ S(A LLt V AtJ AV 4 67AS 14. List of existing nd proposed underground or above-ground storage tanks including age, capacity and contents N O Al E P&6 P 6S F D. FX t S7-1 AJ__ 67 v� - ,ZAa 6,ALLDA1 nAIK , AG7E tanJKAlowAi- ESTIMATE A61E �RGAT�R THAN /14YR.5 15.List of potentially harmful chemicals stored or used on property(existing and proposed) and typical onsite volumes, including but not limited to petroleum products, lubricants, solvents, detergents and pesticides NONE; 16. Describe any wastes generated and their means of disposal 8LA!L D !M!35 TO SE 1 C til IV ' c T E O To Pu13Lt G SEW R FOOD R FCa C_ 7a 8,e IREATI;D /N A 7P,E.AS O TRAP r 17. mate application will be heard by Planning and Zoning Commission 1l-14'a Q ( T&Nr) 18. Date application will be heard by Zoning Board of Appeals 19. Date application will be heard by Inland Wetlands Commission l�'3' D�{-�rF A!T> 20. Name, address and telephone number of contact person for the project DSS161A/ P90 pe55(dNAc.s, /NG PH Sbo-291-g:75, J_L4 DV L H U( G R . /65S SO lA'T74-,SA.TEL L J T-e ROAD -AX 860-2q/-$4S' s ot(Tf-} W ND 091 GT 0407H S S D C - D Name of person completing form i a Date Nov 03 04 01 : 57p Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 p, 2 m DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects Transmitted via certified mail September 23, 2004 Dear Current Abutting Property Owner Re: Application of Scott Leonard 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 1585 In accordance with regulations of the Inland Wetlands Agency and the Planning&Zoning Commission, we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing(s)by the Inland Wetlands Agency and Planning& Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and/ or give comments, however, you are not required to attend_ You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s) prior to the meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard, please contact Kelli Koehler, Administrative Secretary, Michele Lipe,Deputy Planning Director, or Jeffrey Foiger, Environmental Planner, at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253, 252 or 229, respectively. Thank you. SincX'PeterR. DeMallle l DESSIO ALS, INC. -"Il-e- 1 By President 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax: (860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil(d—:aol.com DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ suneyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects Direct Abutters Scott Leonard 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue DPI Project No. 1585 Man Lot No. Property Owner MailingAddress 100 27 Ronald&Paule Martin 46 Woodpond Road West Hartford, CT 06107 100 28 The Neighborhood Pud PO Box 280928 G&W Management, Inc. East Hartford, CT 06128 100 31 Timothy M. Moriarty 90 Skyline Drive 100 32 Ralph C. &Mary T. Hall 1024 Sullivan Avenue 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Conitecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755.Fax: (860)291-8757 Email: dpicivil@aol.com • l�g FILE Time : 16:37:22 Mapping List Report Mon Feb 23 2004 Pg 607 (mbl_prt) Map Number Range (* = ALL) Map Blk Lot Street Number/ Owner Volumn Page Name Mailing Address Zoning ------------ -------------- ---------------- ----------- WEST HARTFORD CT 06107 100 28 (9250) (0000 ) NEIGHBORHOOD THE PUD REF.ONLY 587 485 WAPPING AVENUE SO WINDSOR CT 06074 DRZ 100 28 1 (9250) (0005 ) ROBBINS ARTHUR A & BARBARA B 617 201 WAPPING AVENUE 5 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 2 (9250) (0015 ) NORTON NANCY J 627 411 WAPPING AVENUE 15 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 3 (9250) (0019 ) CORMIER BRIAN E & ANNIE G 665 067 WAPPING *AVENUE 19 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 4 (9250) (0023 ) ABOUAKAR ELAINE 1263 232 WAPPING AVENUE 23 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 5 (9250) (0027 ) MCGOWAN JAMES C & ANNA-LUZ B 620 225 WAPPING AVENUE 27 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 6 (9250) (0041 ) ZUHONE ERIC J & TAMMY L 143047 WAPPING AVENUE 41 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 7 (9250) (0045 ) VANEPPS SCOTT ROBERT & 969 119 WAPPING AVENUE 45 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 8 (9250) (0049 ) TSOI WING KWAN & 1536241 f WAPPING AVENUE 49 WAPPING AVENUE DRZ 100 28 9 (1820) (0021 ) KEMPF SUZANNE ROBBINS 922 098 CHAPIN STREET 21 CHAPIN STREET DRZ 100 28 10 (1820) (0025 ) KAJLIK EDITH 1444314 CHAPIN STREET 25 CHAPIN STREET DRZ 100 28 11 (1820) (0031 ) JOHNSON BRENT A & KIM M 930 188 CHAPIN STREET 31 CHAPIN ST <, DRZ 100 28 12 (1820) (0035 ) SCHUSTER DEBRA A 641 110 CHAPIN STREET 35 CHAPIN ST DRZ 100 28 13 (1820) (0036 ) LIU YING LING 1086081 Time : 16:37:22 Mapping List Report Mon Feb 23 2004 Pg 608 (mbl_prt) Map Number' Range (* = ALL) * Map Blk Lot Street Number/ Owner Volumn Page Name Mailing Address Zoning CHAPIN STREET 36 CHAPIN STREET DRZ 100 28 14 (1820) (0032 ) THIBODEAU MICHAEL J & CHARLINE A 642 276 CHAPIN STREET 32 CHAPIN ST DRZ 100 28 15 (1820) (0024 ) MATHERS MARJORIE A 1083125 CHAPIN STREET 24 CHAPIN ST DRZ 100 28 16 (1820) (0020 ) GARCIA LISA & 150060 CHAPIN STREET 20 CHAPIN STREET DRZ 100 28 17 (1820) (0016 ) NICEWICZ DAVID R & JOELLA A 635 110 CHAPIN STREET 16 CHAPIN ST DRZ 100 28 18 (1820) (0012 ) MARCROFT KEITH E & COREEN L 1247294 CHAPIN STREET 12 CHAPIN ST DRZ 100 28 19 (1820) (0008 ) FISHER DEBRA A 878 013 CHAPIN STREET 8 CHAPIN STREET DRZ 100 28 20 (9250) (0048 ) LIMBERGER JILL M 878 088 WAPPING AVENUE 48 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 21 (9250) (0044 ) JONES ALTAMESE S 776 145 WAPPING AVENUE 44 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 22 (1160) (0007 ) COYNE MICHAEL S & KELLY 1485106 f BISSELL COURT 7 BISSELL COURT DRZ 100 28 23 (1160) (0025 ) BARNES JAMES A & ELISE S 622 527 BISSELL COURT 25 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 24 (1160) (0031 ) BOSSE COLETTE 623 073 BISSELL COURT 31 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 25 (1160) (0035 ) POSPISIL-BUKOWSKI ALISON & 634 136 BISSELL COURT 35 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 26 (1160) (0041 ) FALLETTI WILLIAM A JR & NANCY A 621 231 BISSELL COURT 41 BISSELL CT DRZ Time 16:37:22 Mapping List Report Mon Feb 23 2004 Pg 609 (mbl_prt) Map Number Range (* = ALL) Map Blk Lot Street Number/ Owner Volumn Page Name Mailing Address Zoning 100 28 27 (1160) (0045 ) TYMOSZCZUK MARION & ANNA 1212264 BISSELL COURT 45 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 28 (1160) (0044 ) _BARANOSKI KENNETH & FOLGER LYNN 660 135 BISSELL COURT 44 BISSELL COURT DRZ 100 28 29 (1160) (0040 ) CALABRO KENNETH J 1166074 BISSELL COURT 40 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 30 (1160) (0034 ) KAMERER KATHERINE 625 381 BISSELL COURT 34 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 31 (1160) (0030 ) CIRONE CATHLEEN M 1436181 BISSELL COURT 30 BISSELL COURT DRZ 100 28 32 (1160) (0024 ) JOHNSON JOSEPH 631 002 BISSELL COURT 24 BISSELL CT DRZ 100 28 33 (1160) (0018 ) KVIETKAUSKAS KAREN 684 72 BISSELL COURT 18 BISSEL COURT DRZ 100 28 34 (1160) (0014 ) PIENKOSZ ALFRED & REGINA 1176142 BISSELL COURT 14 BISSELL COURT DRZ 100 28 35 (9250) (0036 ) BACKLUND DIANA 1168 089 WAPPING AVENUE 36 WAPPING AVENUE DRZ 100 28 36� (9250) (0032 ) DIENNOR MICHAEL D & LORI M 1541055 WAPPING AVENUE 32 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 37 (9250) (0028 ) LAVOIE THOMAS E 965 289 WAPPING AVENUE 28 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 38 (9250) (0024 ) NASON ANGELA M & EDWARD L JR 1016 284 WAPPING AVENUE 24 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 39 (9250) (0020 ) DEFFLEY MONICA A 625 310 WAPPING AVENUE 20 WAPPING AVE DRZ 100 28 40 (8690) (0019 ) ECHARD BRIAN L & 1490161 STOUGHTON DRIVE 19 STOUGHTON DRIVE DRZ . Time : 16:37:22 Mapping List Report . Mon Feb 23 2004 Pg : 610 (mbl_prt) Map Number Range (* =._ALL) Map Blk Lot Street Number/ Owner Volumn Page Name Mailing Address Zoning 100 28 41 (8690) (0021 ) .BESSETTE DAVID J & .SANDY I DRZ0227 STOUGHTON DRIVE 21 STOUGHTON DRIVE 100 28 42 (8690) (0027 ) BASU NIRUPAM K & SAMITA 1274331 STOUGHTON DRIVE 27 STOUGHTON DRIVE DRZ 100 28 43 (8690) (0031 ) MORAGLIA DOMINICK A & JANET C 858 DRZ 186 STOUGHTON DRIVE P O BOX 634 ORANGE CT 06477 10o 28 44 (8690) (0035 ) MUSGRAVE PAULA C 956 216 STOUGHTON DRIVE 75 PAPER CHASE DRZ lo0 28 45 (8690) (0036 ) WAN CHUNG 1354298 STOUGHTON DRIVE 36 STOUGHTON DRIVE DRZ 100 28 46 (8690) (0030_ - ) MELIA KAREN L & EDMUND T /- 587 DRZ 485 STOUGHTON DRIVE 30 STOUGHTON DRIVE 100 28 47 (8690) (0026 ) HAYES TIMOTHY & CHERETTA 620 DRZ 274 STOUGHTON DRIVE 26 STOUGHTON DRIVE 100 28 48 (8690) (0022 ) BURLESON JAN A 1502275 STOUGHTON DRIVE 22 STOUGHTON DRIVE DRZ 100 28 49 (8690) (0016 ) LEE EILEEN M 978 192 STOUGHTON DRIVE 16 STOUGHTON DRIVE DRZ t 100 28 50 (9250) (0012. ) RAMSEY MARY B 615 409DRZ WAPPING AVENUE 12 WAPPING AVE 100 28 51 (9250) (0004 ) BLACKWELL TIMOTHY J & GEORGIA R 1543024 WAPPING AVENUE 4 WAPPING AVE DRZ �__ 10 —=e 90 196 i9e go (8:730) (1006 ) 7FONARD SCOTT logo 196 rt,T IV4B i l o r-AVE=R T-ANP, GC 1-9 14 SNA-LTU,AN AIM c;[' g i Stormwater Management Plan Site Plan Modification 1000, 1006, 1014 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut RECEIVED SEP 3 0 Z004 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, tt :w Prepared by Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06074 DPI Project No. 1585 September 29,2004 i 7 Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Existing Conditions I Proposed Development 1 Off-Site Analysis 1 Peak Runoff Control 1 Nonstructural Drainage System 1 Riparian Buffers 1 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Stormwater Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 2 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 On-Site Sewer Calculations 4 Conclusions q Appendices TR-55 Existing on-site A TR-55 Developed B Detention Basin Design C Summary Hydrograph Routings through Basin D Hydrograph Routings through Basin E On-site Storm Sewer Calculations F Introduction: The site is located on the north side of Sullivan Avenue in South Windsor, Connecticut and contains a total of 1.59 acres of land. The site is bordered by the Colony Shops and the Sullivan Avenue Plaza to the west, a residential neighborhood to the north and at the northeast corner, a commercial building directly east, and Sullivan Avenue to the south. There is presently a vacant building located on the southeast corner of the site. There are no wetlands on the property and the site generally slopes down from northeast to southwest. Proposed Development: The proposed development consists of the construction of two commercial buildings with 70 parking spaces and an access drive off of Sullivan Avenue to be shared with the abutter to the east(N/F Timothy Moriarty). The two commercial buildings include: (1)a 2,955 SF bank building with drive-thru service and(2)a 2,520 SF building that includes 1,260 SF of retail and 1,260 SF of a restaurant/fast food store. The proposed access drive will straddle the eastern property line and is partially located on the abutting property(of N/F Moriarty). The storm water management plan and design includes a full analysis of the contribution in runoff from the future development of the N/F Moriarty property. The site will be serviced by public sanitary sewer and water. The existing structures on the Leonard site will be demolished. The storm drainage system proposed for the development includes the installation of storm-sewers within the parking areas, a piped storm drainage system, a Baysaver Unit, and a detention basin. The drainage discharge from the development will be to a detention basin that will discharge into the State drainage system via an existing catch basin located within Sullivan Avenue near the southwest corner of the site. Off-Site Analysis: The site presently drains overland to Sullivan Avenue to the existing catch basin on Sullivan Avenue near the southwest corner of the site. The catch basin is part of the State drainage system. The detention basin has been designed to discharge at less than or equal to the existing peak runoff rates from the site. Peak Runoff Control: The intent of the design is to provide sufficient detention on site to provide post development peak discharges at or below existing peak discharges. Nonstructural Drainage Systems: The site will make use of a detention basin to help control the runoff from the site and help treat the runoff prior to discharge. Riparian Buffers: Existing vegetation along the perimeter of the property was maintained to the maximum extent feasible. S 7 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the site design. These measures include the following: 1. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of silt fence around the yard drain and catch basins. 4. Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 5. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 6. Installation of construction entrance pads. 7. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality: A Baysaver unit will treat runoff from the paved areas associated with the development. In addition, the customary measures will be utilized, including providing sumps within the catch basins. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to the detention basin. The piped drainage system has been designed to accommodate the runoff from a 10-year design storm. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site presently drains to the State drainage system located within Sullivan Avenue. Under developed conditions, the site will continue to drain into the State drainage system. Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water System and Detention Basin. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide. Additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system. Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and/or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. Catch Basins: The catch basins shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reach one foot. Pavement Sweeping: The pavement areas shall be swept at a minimum of twice per year. Once in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season, and once in the fall after the leaves have fallen. Detention Basin: The detention basin shall be inspected twice yearly. All large woody growth that may affect the flow of water or the stability of the basin shall be removed. The riprap shall be re-arranged and added to as required to maintain the design as per the design plans. Any erosion or other problems that may affect the proper operation of the basin shall be repaired promptly. � 7 Baysaver Unit: The maintenance of the Baysaver unit shall be done in accordance with the manufacturers requirements. Topographic Contour Map: A topographic contour map has been provided showing the drainage areas for the site at a scale of 1"=20'. Maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included at the rear of this report. Floodplain Boundaries: The site is not located in a flood hazard zone. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The flood routing and basin modeling was completed utilizing the Hydroflow Hydrographs for Windows computer program by Inteli solve. The drainage piping on site was designed using the Rational Formula. Under existing conditions, the site is divided into three drainage areas: Drainage Area A, B, and C. Drainage Area A consists of the portion of the site that will be improved as part of the proposed development and routed through the detention basin. Under existing conditions, stormwater runoff from the site flows overland to the catch basin near the southwest corner of the site on Sullivan Avenue. Under developed conditions, stormwater runoff from the site will be routed through the proposed detention basin before being discharged to the existing catch basin within Sullivan Avenue. The results of the TR-55 analysis for existing conditions are included in Appendix A. Drainage Area B contains a portion of the proposed access drive that will not be routed through the basin. The area of proposed impervious coverage is offset by existing impervious areas within the Right-of-Way that will be converted to lawn under development conditions. Drainage Area B also contains the southern portion of the N/F Moriarty property (approximately 0.097 acres). This area is lawn presently and will remain lawn after development. Drainage Area B presently drains and will continue to drain overland into the State drainage system via an,existing catch basin on Sullivan Avenue near the southwest comer of the N/F Moriarty property. Area B under developed conditions will not contribute additional peak flow to the State drainage system; therefore, no further analysis of drainage of Drainage Area B was required. The third drainage area (Area C) is located on the north side of the property (approximately 0.16 acres). Drainage Area C is generally wooded and presently drains to the north, away from our detention basin and the State drainage system. Some re-grading is proposed within Drainage Area C; however, this will have negligible impact on the drainage patterns and peak flows draining from the site to the north. Therefore, no further analysis of Drainage Area C was required. The site (Area A) was analyzed under developed conditions using the TR-55 computer progr'ft. The results of the TR-55 analysis for developed conditions are included in 1 7 Appendix B. A summary of the existing and developed peak discharges (in cubic feet per second)follows: Design Storm Existing Peak Developed Peak Discharge Discharge to Basin 2 1 3 10 2 6 25 3 8 50 3 9 100 4 10 The site will continue to discharge to the State drainage system on Sullivan Avenue. In order to mitigate for the peak flows, a detention basin is proposed. The detention basin is sized to provide sufficient detention for the 2-100 year storm events and to discharge with peak flows at or below the existing peak discharge. For storm events up to and including the 100-year storm event, stormwater will discharge from the basin through a 4" and 8" orifice and a 15"outlet pipe. Storms in excess of the 100-year storm event will discharge via a catch basin at the top of the outlet structure. The design of the detention basin is included in Appendix C. The summary pages for the hydrograph_routings for the 2-100 year design storms through the detention basin are included in Appendix D. The full routings are including in Appendix E. A summary of the existing drainage discharges and design peak discharges from the basin areas follows: Design Storm Existing Peak Basin Design Discharge 2 1 0.65 10 2 1.96 25 3 2.45 50 3 2.74 100 4 3.01 As can be seen from the detention basin design, the discharges for the 2-100 year storm events are less than the existing peak discharges into the State drainage system. On-Site Sewer Calculations: The storm sewer calculations for the storm piping within the site are included in Appendix F. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the Rational Formula. Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated detention basin and Baysaver unit will mitigate any potential storm-water quantity and quality impacts from the development of the site. APPENDIX A r RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions 8-12-04 Subarea : 1.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 750 - 1.59(61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 0.16(98) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) '1.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBAREA: 1.75 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 1.75 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 64* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions 8-12-04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sheet 3.2 300 0.067 E 0.242 Shallow Concent'd 103 0.047 P 0.006 Time of Concentration = 0.25* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions 8-12-04 Data: Drainage Area 1.75 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 64 * Time of Concentration: 0.25 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE I Storm Number 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 l 5 1 1----------------------1------1------1------1------I------1 I Frequency (yrs) 1 2 ) 10 1 25 I 50 1 100 I j 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 1 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 I 6.9 1 I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 1 0.35 1 0.24 1 0.20 1 0. 18 .1 0.16 1 I I I I I I I Runoff (in) 1 0.56 11.39 ( 1.91 1 2.41 1 2.93 i I I I I I I I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 10.635 10.744 10.765 10.778 10.789 1 I (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1.00 1 1. 00 1 1. 00 1 1.00 1 I 0.0% Ponds Used ► I 1 I I I 1----------------------1------1------I------1------1------1 I Peak Discharge (cfs) ( 1 I 2 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines x � APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions 8-12-04 Subarea : 1.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 750 - 0.60 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 1.15 (98) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 1.75 ----------------------------------------------------------7-------------------- SUBAREA: 1.75 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 1.75 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 85* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions 8-12-04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 21 0.330 E 0.015 Shallow Concent'd 68 0.05 P 0.004 Open Channel 194 2 0.027 Time of Concentration = 0.05* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 o Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method r n, a GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : 1585/1550 Leonard/Moriarty User: jas Date: 08/12/99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions 8-12-04 Data: Drainage Area 1.75 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 85 * Time of Concentration: 0.05 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE I Storm Number 1 1 ( 2 i 3 1 4 1 5 1 1----------------------1------►------1------1------I------1 1 Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 ► 50 1 100 1 I i I I I I I j 24-1ir Rainfall (in) I 3.2 ) 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 I 6.9 I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 1 0.11 1 0.08 1 0.06 1 0.06 .1 0.05 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 Used 1 0.11 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 I I I I i I I Runoff (in) 1 1.76 ( 3.09 13.83 14.49 1 5.16 I I I I I I I I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 11.126 11.128 11.128 1.1. 128 11.128 1 I (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 I 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1- ---------------i------i------j------j ------1 ------I 1 Peak Discharge (cfs) ( 3 1 6 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C Reservoir Report Page , Reservoir No. 1 - Detention Basin Hydranow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas.Average end area method used. Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sglt) Incr.Storage(cult) Total storage(cult) 0.00 120.00 460 0 0 2.00 122.00 1,486 1,946 1,946 4.00 124.00 2,746 4,232 6,178 6.00 126.00 4,313 7,059 13,237 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise in = 15.0 4.0 8.0 0.0 Crest Len lt = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span in = 15.0 4.0 8.0 0.0 Crest El.It = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 1 1 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.It = 120.00 120.00 122.80 0.00 Weir Type = - - - - Length it = 13.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Multi-Stage =. No No No No Slope% = 1.15 1.00 1.00 0.00 N Value = .013 .013 .013 .013 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Multistage = n/a Yes Yes No Exfiltration Rate = 0.00 in/hr/sgft Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Civ A Civ B CIv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D -Exfil Total It cult It cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0.00 2.00 1,946 122.00 0.59 0.54 0.00 - - - - - - 0.54 4.00 6,178 124.00 2.31 0.74 1.56 - - - - - - 2.30 6.00 13,237 126.00 3.75 0.90 2.85 - - - - - - 3.75 APPENDIX D Hydrograph Return Period Recap Pagel Hyd- Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow(cfs) Hydrograph No. type Hyd(s) description (origin) 1 Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 SCS Runoff 3.75 6.53 8.03 9.35 10.66 Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 1 0.65 — 1.96 2.45 2.74 3.01 Proj. file: 1585 pzc.gpw Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cts) (min) (min) (cult) M (cuff) 1 SCS Runoff 3.75 1 722 10,159 Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 0.65 1 749 10,058 1 122.73 3,494 Proj. file: 1585_pzc.gpw Return Period: 2 yr Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Tone Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maxenwn Hydrograph No. type now interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (rrun) (min) (cuff) {lt► (cult) 1 SCS Runoff 6.53 1 722 17,873 — Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 1.96 1 739 17,714 1 123.69 5,522 Proj. file: 1585 pzc.gpw Retum Period: 10 yr Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Page, Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 8.03 1 722 22,157 — Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 2.45 1 738 21,970 1 124.16 6,730 Proj. file: 1585 pzc.gpw Return Period: 25 yr Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No, type ttow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ff) (cuff) 1 SCS Runoff 9.35 1 722 25,964 — — Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 2.74 1 739 25,760 1 124.51 7,966 Proj_ file: 1585_pzc_gpw Return Period: 50 yr Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Tune to Volume Inflow Maximum Maxirnum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) Olin) (cuft) (tt) (cult) 1 SCS Runoff 10.66 1 722 29,811 — Detention Basin 2 Reservoir 3.01 1 740 29,590 1 124.87 9,242 Proj. file: 1585 pzc.gpw Return Period: 100 yr Run date: 09-29-2004 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve APPENDIX E Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.65 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = Detention Basin Max. Elevation = 122.73 ft Max. Storage = 3,494 cult Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=10,058 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exf l Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 2.50 122.31 0.60 0.59 ---- ---- ----- --- ----- ---- -- 0.59 12.12 2.12 122.35 0.60 0.59 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.59 12.13 1.84 122.39 0.60 0.60 ---- ----- ---- -- ----- ----- ----- 0.60 12.15 1.69 122.43 0.61 0.60 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- --- _ 0.60 12.17 1.62 122.46 0.62 0.61 ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ---- ----- 0.61 12.18 1.58 122.48 0.63 0.61 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.61 12.20 1.53 122.51 0.63 0.62 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- ----- 0.62 12.22 1.48 122.54 0.64 0.62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.62 12.23 1.44 122.56 0.65 0.62 ----- ---- ----- -- --- ---- ----- 0.62 12.25 1.39 122.58 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.27 1.34 122.60 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.28 1.28 122.62 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.63 12.30 1.23 122.64 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.63 12.32 1.18 122.66 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.64 12.33 1.13 122.67 0.66 0.64 ---- ---- --- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.64 12.35 1.07 122.68 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.64 12.37 1.02 122.70 0.66 0.64 -- ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ..... 0.64 12.38 0.97 122.71 0.66 0.64 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.64 12.40 0.91 122.71 0.66 0.64 ---- -- ---- _____ __- -w ____ 0.64 12.42 0.86 122.72 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.64 12.43 0.80 122.73 0.66 0.65 ----- ---- ----, ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.65 12.45 0.74 122.73 0.66 0.65 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.65 12.47 0.69 122.73 0.66 0.65 0.65 12.48 0.63 122.73<< 0.66 0.65 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.65<< 12.50 0.57 122.73 0.66 0.65 ----- -- ----- ____ ____ _____ ____ 0.65 12.52 0.52 122.73 0.66 0.65 ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.65 12.53 0.49 122.72 0.66 0.65 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- 0.65 12.55 0.47 122.72 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.64 12.57 0.46 122.71 0.66 0.64 -- --_- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.64 12.58 0.45 122.71 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --- 0.64 12.60 0.45 122.70 0.66 0.64 ---- ---- ---- ---• ---- ----- ---- 0.64 12.62 0.44 122.70 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- =---- ----- ---- ----- 0.64 12.63 0.43 122.69 0.66 0.64 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.64 12.65 0.43 122.69 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.64 12.67 0.42 122.68 0.66 0.64 0.64 12.68 0.42 122.67 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.64 12.70 0.41 122.67 0.66 0.64 --- ----- --- ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.64 12.72 0.41 122.66 0.66 0.64 --- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- 0.64 Continues on next page... J 1 � Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A div B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.73 0.40 122.65 0.66 0.64 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.64 12.75 0.39 122.65 0.66 0.63 ----- ---- -- ----_ _�_ _____ ___ 0.63 12.77 0.39 122.64 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.63 12.78 0.38 122.63 0.66 0.63 ----- ---- ---- �__ __M �__ 0.63 12.80 0.38 122.63 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.82 0.37 122.62 0.66 0.63 ---- ---- -_ ---_ ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.83 0.37 122.61 0.66 0.63 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.85 0.36 122.60 0.66 0.63 -- ---- --- ---- ___ ___ _____ 0.63 12.87 0.35 122.60 0.66 0.63 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ..... 0.63 12.88 0.35 122.59 0.66 0.63 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.63 12.90 0.34 122.58 0.66 0.63 ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.63 12.92 0.34 122.57 0.65 0.62 ----- ---- ---- --- ---- ----- ----- 0.62 12.93 0.33 122.56 0.65 0.62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.62 12.95 0.32 122.56 0.65 0.62 ---- ----- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- 0.62 12.97 0.32 122.55 0.65 0.62 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.62 12.98 0.31 122.54 0.64 0.62 ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.62 13.00 0.31 122.53 0.64 0.62 ----- ----- ----- ----- -�-- ---- ----- 0.62 13.02 0.30 122.52 0.64 0.62 -- ----- ---- ----- ----- --- ---- 0.62 13.03 0.30 122.51 0.63 0.62 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.62 13.05 0.29 122.50 0.63 0.61 ----- --- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.61 13.07 0.29 122.49 0.63 0.61 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ..... 0.61 13.08 0.29 122.48 0.63 0.61 ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.61 13.10 0.29 122.47 0.62 0.61 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.61 13.12 0.29 122.47 0.62 0.61 --- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.61 13.13 0.29 122.46 0.62 0.61 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ..... 0.61 13.15 0.28 122.45 0.62 0.61 ---- ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- 0.61 13.17 0.28 122.44 0.61 0.61 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.61 13.18 0.28 122.43 0.61 0.60 ----- ----- -_--- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.60 13.20 0.28 122.42 0.61 0.60 ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.60 13.22 0.28 122.41 0.60 0.60 --- ---- ----- ---- ----- --- --_ 0.60 13.23 0.28 122.40 0.60 0.60 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.60 13.25 0.28 122.39 0.60 0.60 ---- ----- --- --_- ----- ---- ---- 0.60 13.27 0.27 122.38 0.60 0.60 ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.60 13.28 0.27 122.37 0.60 0.60 ----- ----- -_ ----- ----- ----- -_-- 0.60 13.30 0.27 122.36 0.60 0.60 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.60 13.32 0.27 122.36 0.60 0.59 -- ---- -- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.59 13.33 0.27 122.35 0.60 0.59 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.59 13.35 0.27 122.34 0.60 0.59 ---- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- 0.59 13.37 0.26 122.33 0.60 0.59 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.59 13.38 0.26 122.32 0.60 0.59 ----- ---- ----- ----_ w_ ___ ____ 0.59 13.40 0.26 122.31 0.60 0.59 --- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.59 13.42 0.26 122.30 0.60 0.59 ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- -- ---- 0.59 13.43 0.26 122.29 0.59 0.59 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.59 13.45 0.26 122.28 0.59 0.58 ---- -- ---- ----- ----- ----- -_--- 0.58 13.47 0.26 122.27 0.59 0.58 ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.58 ...End Hydrograph Report Page, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.45 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = Detention Basin Max. Elevation = 124.16 ft Max. Storage = 6,730 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograo volume=21,970 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfll Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 5.21 123.96 2.27 0.74 1.53 --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.26 12.12 4.40 124.02 2.33 0.74 1.58 ---- ----- - ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.32 12.13 3.81 124.05 2.36 0.74 1.61 --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.35 12.15 3.49 124.07 2.38 0.74 1.63 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 2.37 12.17 3.33 124.09 2.40 0.74 1.64 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- --_ 2.39 12.18 3.23 124.10 2.41 0.75 1.65 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.40 12.20 3.13 124.12 2.43 0.75 1.67 ----- --- ----- ----- --- --- 2.41 12.22 3.02 124.13 2.44 0.75 1.68 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.42 12.23 2.92 124.14 2.45 0.75 1.68 ---- ----- ---- --- -- ----- 2.43 12.25 2.81 124.15 2.46 0.75 1.69 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.44 12.27 2.71 124.15 2.46 0.75 1.69 ----- ---- --- ---- ---- --- 2.44 12.28 2.60 124.15 2.46 0.75 1.70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 2.45 12.30 2.49 124.16<< 2.47 0.75 1.70 ----- ---- ---- -- ---- ----- 2.45<< 12.32 2.38 124.16 2.47 0.75 1.70 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.45 12.33 2.27 124.15 2.46 0.75 1.70 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.45 12.35 2.16 124.15 2.46 0.75 1.69 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.44 12.37 2.05 124.14 2.45 0.75 1.69 ---- ----- ---- - --- ---- 2.44 12.38 1.94 124.14 2.45 0.75 1.68 ---- ---- ' ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.43 12.40 1.82 124.13 2.44 0.75 1.67 -_- ----- -- ----- ----- ----- 2.42 12.42 1.71 124.12 2.43 0.75 1.66 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.41 12.43 1.60 124.10 2.41 0.75 1.65 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2.40 12.45 1.48 124.09 2.40 0.74 1.64 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.39 12.47 1.37 124.07 2.38 0.74 1.63 ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- 2.37 12.48 1.26 124.06 2.36 0.74 1.61 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.35 12.50 1.14 124.04 2.34 0.74 1.60 ---- ---- --_-- ---- ----- ---- 2.34 12.52 1.04 124.01 2.32 0.74 1.58 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 2.32 12.53 0.97 123.99 2.30 0.74 1.55 --- ---- _____ ___ __- ----- 2.29 12.55 0.93 123.95 2.26 0.73 1.52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.25 12.57 0.91 123.91 2.23 0.73 1.48 --- ----- --- ----- --- --- 2.21 ...End � I 3 Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.74 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = Detention Basin Max. Elevation = 124.51 ft Max. Storage = 7,966 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=25,760 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs Cfs cfs cfs Cfs cfs cfs 12.08 7.06 124.21 2.52 0.75 1.75 --- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 2.50 12.10 6.03 124.28 2.57 0.76 1.80 ---- ---- - ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.56 12.12 5.09 124.33 2.61 0.76 1.84 ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.60 12.13 4.41 124.37 2.64 0.76 1.87 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.63 12.15 4.04 124.39 2.66 0.77 1.89 ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ---- 2.65 12.17 3.85 124.42 2.68 0.77 1.90 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.67 12.18 3.74 124.44 2.69 0.77 1.92 ---- --- ---- ----- - --- 2.69 12.20 3.62 124.45 2.71 0.77 1.93 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.70 12.22 3.49 124.47 2.72 0.77 1.94 ----- -- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.71 12.23 3.37 124.48 2.73 0.77 1.95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 2.72 12.25 3.25 124.49 2.73 0.77 1.96 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- 2.73 12.27 3.12 124.50 2.74 0.77 1.96 --- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- 2.73 12.28 3.00 124.50 2.74 0.77 1.96 ---_ ---- ---- ---- -- .- ---- 2.74 12.30 2.87 124.51 2.75 0.77 1.97 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 2.74 12.32 2.74 124.51 << 2.75 0.77 1.97 -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- 2.74<< 12.33 2.61 124.51 2.75 0.77 1.97 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.74 12.35 2.49 124.50 2.74 0.77 1.96 _-- -_- 2.74 12.37 2.36 124.50 2.74 0.77 1.96 ----- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.73 12.38 2.23 124.49 2.73 0.77 1.96 ---- ----- --- ---- ---- ----- 2.73 12.40 2.10 124.48 2.73 0.77 1.95 ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.72 12.42 1.97 124.47 2.72 0.77 1.94 ----- --- ----- --- ---- ----- 2.71 12.43 1.84 124.45 2.71 0.77 1.93 --- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.70 12.45 1.71 124.44 2.69 0.77 1.92 ----- --- ----- ---- ---- ---- 2.69 12.47 1.58 124.42 2.68 0.77 1.91 ----- ---- ----- --- ----- ----- 2.68 12.48 1.45 124.40 2.67 0.77 1.89 - -- ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.66 12.50 1.32 124.38 2.65 0.77 1.88 --- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 2.64 12.52 1.20 124.36 2.63 0.76 1.86 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 2.62 12.53 1.11 124.33 2.61 0.76 1.84 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.60 12.55 1.07 124.31 2.59 0.76 1.82 -- ---- --- --- ---- ----- 2.58 12.57 1.05 124.28 2.57 0.76 1.80 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 2.56 12.58 1.03 124.26 2.55 0.76 1.78 2.54 12.60 1.02 124.23 2.53 0.75 1.76 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- --- 2.51 12.62 1.00 124.20 2.51 0.75 1.74 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ---- 2.49 12.63 0.99 124.18 2.49 0.75 1.72 --- --- ----- ----- --- ----- 2.47 ...End 1 . Hydrograph Report Page Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 3.01 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = Detention Basin Max. Elevation = 124.87 ft Max. Storage = 9,242 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=29,590 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExHl Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.08 8.03 124.51 2.75 0.77 1.97 ----- --- 2.74 12.10 6.86 124.59 2.81 0.78 2.03 ----- ----- , ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.80 12.12 5.78 124.65 2.85 0.78 2.07 2.85 12.13 5.00 124.69 2.88 0.78 2.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.88 12.15 4.58 124.72 2.91 0.79 2.12 2.90 12.17 4.37 124.75 2.92 0.79 2.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---_ 2.92 12.18 4.24 124.77 2.94 0.79 2.15 ---- ---- ----- ---- _____ ____ 2.94 12.20 4.10 124.79 2.96 0.79 2.17 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.96 12.22 3.96 124.81 2.97 0.79 2.18 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 2.97 12.23 3.82 124.83 2.98 0.79 2.19 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.98 12.25 3.68 124.84 2.99 0.79 2.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 2.99 12.27 3.54 124.85 3.00 0.80 2.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.00 12.28 3.39 124.86 3.00 0.80 2.21 ---_ -- ---- ---- ----- ----- 3.00 12.30 3.25 124.86 3.01 0.80 2.21 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --_- 3.01 12.32 3.10 124.87 3.01 0.80 2.21 ----- -_- --- ----- ----- ----- 3.01 12.33 2.96 124.87<< 3.01 0.80 2.21 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ____ 3.01 << 12.35 2.81 124.87 3.01 0.80 2.21 ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- --- 3.01 12.37 2.67 124.86 3.01 0.80 2.21 ---- ----- - ----- ----- ---- ----- 3.00 12.38 2.52 124.85 3.00 0.80 2.20 ---- ---- ----- --- --- ----- 3.00 12.40 2.37 124.85 2.99 0.79 2.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- --- 2.99 12.42 2.23 124.83 2.98 0.79 2.19 ---- --_ ---- ----- ----- ---- 2.98 12.43 2.08 124.82 2.97 0.79 2.18 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.97 12.45 1.93 124.80 2.96 0.79 2.17 ----- ----- --_ _w_ _____ ____ 2.96 12.47 1.78 124.78 2.95 0.79 2.16 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.95 12.48 1.64 124.76 2.93 0.79 2.15 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.93 12.50 1.49 124.74 2.92 0.79 2.13 --- --- ----- ----- ----- --- 2.92 12.52 1.35 124.72 2.90 0.79 2.11 --- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 2.90 12.53 1.26 124.69 2.88 0.78 2.09 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- --- 2.88 12.55 1.21 124.66 2.86 0.78 2.08 ----- -- -- ---- ----- ----- 2.86 12.57 1.18 124.63 2.84 0.78 2.06 --- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 2.84 12.58 1.17 124.60 2.82 0.78 2.04 --- ---- ---- ----- ---- --- 2.82 12.60 1.15 124.58 2.80 0.78 2.02 --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.79 12.62 1.14 124.55 2.78 0.78 2.00 ----- --- ----- ----- ----_ ----- 2.77 12.63 1.12 124.52 2.76 0.77 1.98 ---- -- ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.75 12.65 1.10 124.49 2.74 0.77 1.96 ----- ---_ ---- ---- ----- --- 2.73 12.67 1.09 124.47 2.71 0.77 1.94 ---- ----- ----- ___-- ----- ----- 2.71 ...End � JOB �5g5 ro essionals inc. yj29 p.4.Y.__._ CalCui.atF.:U nv �>nrt'�. DESIGN STORM FREQ rJ a clvliengineers planners , surveyors gle / l/' l!� CY con ■ " .... CHECKED 6Y ... _. ...._ oars ...._..-----�--_..._...._._— tncrt .nr . A x C T. Co I Q from To ^' C t h e r. o m i n, 1 r c fs p'�:,;;, $; ; Q K V L t N O T E C8r c82 0.27-1 D . 2 Jr i` C83 cB o, .3 0.1'3 0.14b D. 509 3. 15" l,o P, z : 81 b.o98� D. �a 5 , C cg r159 Prg2 .tab f,�.t3p Ga, .�. D. I c s D, i . 07 2 0 0i8 D2 GB /o 010593 0.5-( 0,032 D.b32� CBi 0.3 c89 G oDpTLtr LEE o-oZZ7 z 1 .05 utr OM141 nMN — _ _ _ _ 1, g J. 15 7.0 1 , 9 .. DMH3 t=Xccg — - — ~'-� _ 0.04 5.9 Za. -3 I 1,75 -------------- �l � -_____ DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects September 30,2004 Marcia Banach,Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut RE: Property of Scott Leonard Site Plan& Traffic Impact Study 1000& 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Ms.Banach, The Traffic Impact Study,prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions,for the development of the properties of Scott Leonard at 1000 and 1006 Sullivan Avenue, includes analysis of the traffic impacts from the future development of the Moriarty Property(located at 1014 Sullivan Avenue) because the access drive from Sullivan Avenue will be shared by both the Leonard and Moriarty properties. The development of the Leonard site includes a 2,955 SF bank with drive-through windows at 1000 Sullivan Avenue and a 2,520 SF retail/restaurant building at 1006 Sullivan Avenue. The future development of the Moriarty site includes a 5,040 SF office building. The Site Plan application submitted with this Traffic Impact Study, is to permit the Leonard Site PI only. Mr.Moriarty will submit an application separately for the development of his property. Please call if you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, �1 Judy A. choler oJiect Engineer cc: Scott Leonard Timothy Moriarty George Lee Peter Alter Bruce Hillson 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for t MIXED USE PLAZA PROPOSED FOR 000 SULLIVAN AVENUE in SOUTH WINDSOR C NN O ECTICUT r Prepared By Traffic Engineering Solutions 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, Connecticut (860) 657-3579 September 2004 r Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................2 ExistingConditions.................................................................................................3 Roadways............................................................................................................3 Intersections........................................................................................................4 Existing Traffic Volumes......................................................................................5 Accidents.............................................................................................................5 Project Generated Traffic .................... .................................................. . CapacityAnalyses...................................................................................................8 SiteAccess............................................................................................................11 Conclusions...........................................................................................................13 Last of Tables Table 1 Trip Generation Entering—2,955 S. F. Drive-in Bank, 1,260 S.F. Retail, 1,260 S.F. Restaurant and 5,040 S.F. Office.........................7 Table 2 Trip Generation Leaving—2,955 S. F. Drive-in Bank, 1,260 S.F. Retail, 1,260 S.F. Restaurant and 5,040 S.F. Office.........................8 Table 3 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses.............................................9 Table 4 95"' Percentile Queues............................................................................10 Table 5 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses.......................................11 Table 6 Comparison of Available and Required Intersection SightDistances.......................................................................................12 C:IBUSINESS\NERETAILLEASINGIRE PORT.DOC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scott Leonard ro 0 p p ses to build a waxed use development including a 2,955 square foot bank with drive-through windows, 1,260 square feet of retail space, a 1,260 square foot fast food restaurant with no drive-through window, and 5,040 square feet of office space (medical or general office use). The proposed development is a modification to the site plan that was initially approved by the Planning Commission on January 15, 1998 and reapproved on December 10, 2002 for a Dunkin Donut and 3,250 square feet of retail space. The 2.02 acre site is located along the north side of Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) midway between the signalized intersections with Ayers Road and the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza and the Colony Shops in South Windsor, Connecticut. The existing buildings on the site will be razed to allow construction of the new buildings. Access to the site will be provided by a full access drive along Sullivan Avenue about 475 feet west of Ayers Road. New trips to the roadway system generated by the mixed use development were estimated from the trip generation information included in the ITE Trip Generation reference. Based on the ITE trip generation information, the mixed use plaza will have 122 vehicles entering the site and 127 vehicles leaving during the Friday midday peak hour, 90 vehicles entering the site and 93 vehicles leaving during the Friday afternoon peak hour and 102 vehicles entering the site and 96 leaving during the Saturday midday peak hour. The study assumed that the mixed use development would be completed and opened for business during 2006. The signalized intersections of Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza and Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road were analyzed for existing and future conditions. These two intersections presently operate at Level of Service (LOS) B during the Friday midday, Friday afternoon and Saturday midday peak hours and will continue to operate at the same Level of Service during each peak period for the 2006 No-Build and Build conditions. The queues along westbound Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza and eastbound Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road will be no greater than 203 feet during all any of the peak periods with the added trips associated with the mixed use development. There will be at least 175 feet from the rear of the longest queue at either signalized intersection to the site access drive, meaning the site drive will not be blocked by vehicles waiting for a green light at the two signalized intersections. Left turns from Sullivan Avenue onto the site access drive will operate at LOS B during the Friday midday and Friday afternoon peak hours and LOS A during the Saturday midday peak hour. The site access drive approach to Sullivan Avenue will operate at LOS F during the Friday midday peak hour and LOS D during the Friday afternoon Peak hour and LOS C during the Saturday midday peak hour. Queues on Sullivan Avenue will be no greater than one vehicle at any time and the 954h percentile queue on the site drive C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASINGIREPORT.DOC q will be 92 feet during the Friday midday peak hour, 47 feet during the Friday afternoon peak hour and 36 feet during the Saturday midday peak hour. All sight distances available to drivers entering and leaving the mixed use site exceed the distances presented in the Connecticut DOT 2003 Highway Design Manual for the 85'h percentile travel speeds on Sullivan Avenue. These sight distances will allow drivers the visibility needed to safely enter and leave the site. Recommendations: To facilitate access to the site this study recommends that Sullivan Avenue be restriped to create an eastbound left turn lane for vehicles turning from Sullivan Avenue onto the site access drive. This lane can be created within the area that is presently a painted median on Sullivan Avenue. INTRODUCTION Scott Leonard proposes to build a mixed use development including a 2,955 square foot bank with drive-through windows, 1,260 square feet of retail space, a 1,260 square foot fast food restaurant with no drive-through window, and 5,040 square feet of office space (medical or general office use). The proposed development is a modification to the site plan that was initially approved by the Planning Commission on January 15, 1998 and reapproved on December 10, 2002 for a Dunkin Donut and 3,250 square feet of retail space. The 2.02 acre site is located along the north side of Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) midway between the signalized intersections with Ayers Road and the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza and the Colony Shops in South Windsor, Connecticut. The existing buildings on the site will be razed to allow construction of the new buildings. Access to the site will be provided by a full access drive along Sullivan Avenue about 475 feet west of Ayers Road. This report was prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions to address the traffic impact on roadways and intersections surrounding the project. The following scope of work was included in this study: ■ Making turning movement counts during a Friday midday (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM), Friday afternoon (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) and Saturday midday (11:30 AM to1:30 PM) peak periods at the following locations: 0 Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) at the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza (Geissler's Super Market) and Colony Shops. 0 Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) at Ayers Road. ■ Making a 24-hour directional machine count on Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) along the site frontage. The count included a directional speed study to determine the 85th percentile speed of travel in each direction on Sullivan Avenue (85th percentile speed was used to determine the intersection and stopping sight distances for vehicles entering and leaving the site). ■ Making visual observations of roadways and land use conditions along Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the site. Also, measuring the sight C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\REPORT.DOC 2 distances available to drivers entering and leaving the proposed site drive on Sullivan Avenue. ■ Obtaining from ConnDOT traffic accident information for the latest three year period for Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the site. ■ Obtaining from ConnDOT copies of the traffic signal plans for the two intersections included in this study. ■ Determining the number of trips expected to be added to the roadway system by the proposed bank, retail, office and restaurant uses. ■ Completing Friday midday, Friday afternoon and Saturday midday peak hour capacity analyses for the intersections of Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza and the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road to determine the existing operating Levels of Service (LOS) and anticipated LOS for the traffic volumes expected upon completion of the mixed use development. Also completing capacity analyses for the intersection of Sullivan Avenue at the site drive for the traffic volumes expected upon completion of the development. ■ Comparing the intersection sight distances measured from the site drives with the Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Intersection Sight Distances for the 85th percentile speeds determined from the speed study conducted on Sullivan Avenue. EXISTING CONDITIONS Scott Leonard proposes to build a mixed use development including a 2,955 square foot bank with drive-through windows, 1,260 square feet of retail space, a 1,260 square foot fast food restaurant with no drive-through window, and 5,040 square feet of office space. The 2.02 acre site is located along the north side of Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) midway between the signalized intersections with Ayers Road and the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza and the Colony Shops in South Windsor, Connecticut. The site has approximately 335 feet of frontage along Sullivan Avenue. The existing buildings on the site will be razed to allow construction of the new buildings. Access to the site will be provided by a full access drive along Sullivan Avenue about 475 feet west of Ayers Road. Visual observations were made and traffic counts obtained for the roadways and intersections surrounding the site. Roadways Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) runs from the southeast to the northwest. It begins at its southeast end at the intersection with Ellington Road/Oakland Road (Route 30) and continues northerly and northwesterly for about 4.2 miles to Main Street, about 500 feet west of Route 5. The road continues as Buckland Road south of Ellington Road/Oakland Road. The site is located about 1.4 miles north, northwest of the Ellington Road/Oakland Road intersection. In the vicinity of the development site Sullivan Avenue typically has a single travel lane in each direction. Additional turn lanes are provided C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\REPORT.DOC 3 During the first phase, the westbound through/right turn and left turn movements are allowed to proceed through the intersection with traffic in the eastbound direction being stopped during this phase(protected left turns). Phase two allows all movements in both directions along Sullivan Avenue, including left turns in both directions, to proceed through the intersection (permitted left turns). The third phase allows traffic on the north and south legs to proceed through the intersection. There is no exclusive Pedestrian Phase meaning pedestrians must cross concurrently with the green light. This intersection is coordinated with the signalized intersection east of this location (Ayers Road). Existing Traffic Volumes Twenty-four hour automatic traffic recorder(ATR) counts were obtained from the Connecticut DOT for Sullivan Avenue west of the site. The ConnDOT counts, made during May 2001, were supplemented by traffic counts made for this study. Friday midday (11:30 AM to 12:30 PM) . Friday afternoon (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) and Saturday midday (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM) turning movement counts were made on July 30 and 31, 2004 at the intersections of Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road and Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza. Additionally, a speed study was done from August 4 through August 6, 2004 on Sullivan Avenue along the site frontage. According to the ConnDOT counts, the 2001 average daily traffic(ADT) on Sullivan Avenue west of the site was 14,000 vehicles per day (vpd). The actual 24-hour count during May 2001 was 15,347 vehicles. The speed study conducted for this development indicates that the daily traffic volume on Sullivan Avenue between Ayers Road and the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza is 15,178 vehicles per day. The turning movement counts made for this study indicate that the Friday midday peak hour occurred from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM when 1,360 vehicles traveled Sullivan Avenue along the site frontage (688 vehicles traveled eastbound and 672 vehicles traveled westbound), the Friday afternoon peak hour occurred from 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM when 1,377 vehicles traveled Sullivan Avenue (725 vehicles traveled eastbound and 652 westbound), the Saturday midday peak hour occurred from 11:45 AM to 12:45 PM when 1,124 vehicles traveled Sullivan Avenue (603 vehicles traveled eastbound and 521 westbound). The July and August 2004 turning movement counts and speed study are included in the Appendix to this report. Accidents The Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) Bureau of Planning and Research compiles records of accident data reported by investigating police authorities. Accidents which result in death, injury, or property damage in excess of$1,000 are required to be reported. Accident data was obtained for Sullivan Avenue from 100 feet west of the drives to tl* Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza to 100 feet east of Ayers Road. The accident data covered the latest three-year period for which records are available, January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2001. During the C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\RE PORT.DOC 5 Signalized Intersections Level of Service Avg. Delay/Vehicle (in Seconds) LOS A < 10.0 LOS B > 10.0 and < 20.0 LOS C > 20.0 and < 35.0 LOSD > 35.0 and < 55.0 LOS E > 55.0 and < 80.0 LOS F > 80.0 Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Avg. Delay/Vehicle (in Seconds) LOS A < 10.0 LOSB > 10.0 and < 15.0 LOS C > 15.0 and < 25.0 LOS D > 25.0 and < 35.0 LOS E > 35.0 and < 50.0 LOS F > 50.0 Level-of-service capacity analyses were completed for the 2004 existing traffic volumes, 2006 No-Build, and the 2006 Build conditions for the signalized intersections of Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza and Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road. Capacity analyses were also completed for the unsignalized intersection of Sullivan Avenue at the site drive. The 2006 No Build traffic volumes were determined by increasing the 2004 traffic volumes by a two percent annual growth factor to account for growth that may occur in the area. The 2006 Build conditions were determined by adding the trips generated by the mixed use development to the 2006 No Build traffic volumes. Trips associated with the mixed use center were assigned to the roadway system as shown on the Traffic Flow Diagrams included in the Appendix to this report. Table 3: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2004 Existing 2006 2006 Conditions No-Build Build Location Peak Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Hour Sullivan Ave at Fri Midday 11.6 B 11.9 B 13.6 B Colony Shops & Fri PM 13.7 B 14.3 B 15.3 B Sullivan Ave Plaza Sat Midday 10.9 B 11.2 B 11.5 B Fri Midday 13.8 B 14.5 B 16.5 B Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road Fri PM 13.9 B 15.6 B 17.9 B Sat Midday 1 11.8 B 11.7 B 12.7 B NOTES: V/C = volume-to-capacity ratio. Delay= Average stopped delay, in seconds, to all vehicles entering the intersection. LOS = Level of Service C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\R€PORT.DOC g 1 feet looking to the right (west). The Intersection Sight Distance for Stopped Vehicle Turning Left Across Oncoming Traffic is 510 feet. The Connecticut DOT presents intersection sight distances (ISD) in their December 2003 Highway Design Manual. Figure 11-2D of the ConnDOT Guidelines presents ISD information for each 5 mph increment for speeds between 20 and 70 mph for turns from a side street onto a four lane street. Sullivan Avenue was treated as a four lane road due to the width of the road and presence of the left turn lane to enter the site. The posted speed limit on Sullivan Avenue is 40 miles per hour(mph). The speed study conducted on Sullivan Avenue found that the 851n percentile speeds of travel (the speed at which 85 percent of drivers travel at or less than) are 39 miles per hour for travel in the eastbound direction and 43 miles per hour for travel in the westbound direction. A summary of available intersection sight distances and distances required by ConnDOT in their Guidelines for Highway Design for the 85tn percentile speeds is presented in Table 6. Table 6—Comparison of Available and Required intersection Sight Distances Available Intersection Required Intersection Sight Sight Distance Distance per ConnDOT 2003 Highway Design Manual Looking Left from Site Drive 750 Feet 508 Feet onto Sullivan Avenue Looking Right from Site Drive > 1,000 Feet 463 Feet onto Sullivan Avenue Table 6 shows that the Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) available to drivers looking left and right from the site access drive onto Sullivan Avenue is far greater than the required intersection sight distance provided in the ConnDOT reference for vehicles traveling on Sullivan Avenue at the 85t percentile speeds (39 mph eastbound and 43 mph westbound). A second sight distance measured for this study is for Stopped Vehicle Turning Left Across Oncoming Traffic. Drivers turning left from Sullivan Avenue onto the site can see 510 feet. According to Figure 11-2J of the ConnDOT Guidelines, the distance required for vehicles approaching at the 85tn percentile speed of 43 mph is 349 feet. The available distance (510 feet) is greater than the required distance presented in the ConnDOT reference. While the Stopping Sight Distance for vehicles approaching from the rear of vehicles turning left from Sullivan Avenue onto the site access drive does not come into play due to the left turn lane that will be provided for these turns, the available Stopping Sight Distance (more than 1,000 feet) is far greater than the Stopping Sight Distance of 294 feet presented in the ConnDOT Highway Design Manual for travel speeds approaching at the 85tn percentile speed of 39 mph. C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\REPORT.DOC 12 All sight distances available to drivers entering and leaving the mixed use site exceed the distances presented in the Connecticut DOT 2003 Highway Design Manual for the 851" percentile travel speeds on Sullivan Avenue. These sight distances will allow drivers the visibility needed to safely enter and leave the site. CONCLUSIONS Scott Leonard proposes to build a mixed use development including a 2,955 square foot bank with drive-through windows, 1,260 square feet of retail space, a 1,260 square foot fast food restaurant with no drive-through window, and 5,040 square feet of office space (medical or general office use). The proposed development is a modification to the site plan that was initially approved by the Planning Commission on January 15, 1998 and reapproved on December 10, 2002 for a Dunkin Donut and 3,250 square feet of retail space. The 2.02 acre site is located along the north side of Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) midway between the signalized intersections with Ayers Road and the drives to the Sullivan Avenue Plaza and the Colony Shops in South Windsor, Connecticut. The existing buildings on the site will be razed to allow construction of the new buildings. Access to the site will be provided by a full access drive along Sullivan Avenue about 475 feet west of Ayers Road. New trips to the roadway system generated by the mixed use development were estimated from the trip generation information included in the ITE Trip Generation reference. Based on the ITE trip generation information, the mixed use plaza will have 122 vehicles entering the site and 127 vehicles leaving during the Friday midday peak hour, 90 vehicles entering the site and 93 vehicles leaving during the Friday afternoon peak hour and 102 vehicles entering the site and 96 leaving during the Saturday midday peak hour. The study assumed that the mixed use development would be completed and opened for business during 2006. The signalized intersections of Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza and Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road were analyzed for existing and future conditions. These two intersections presently operate at Level of Service (LOS) B during the Friday midday, Friday afternoon and Saturday midday peak hours and will continue to operate at the same Level of Service during each peak period for the 2006 No-Build and Build conditions. The queues along westbound Sullivan Avenue at the drives to the Colony Shops and Sullivan Avenue Plaza and eastbound Sullivan Avenue at Ayers Road will be no greater than 203 feet during all any of the peak periods with the added trips associated with the mixed use development. There will be at least 175 feet from the rear of the longest queue at either signalized intersection to the site access drive, meaning the site drive will not be blocked by vehicles waiting for a green light at the two signalized intersections. C:\BUSINESS\NER ETA IL LEAS ING\RE PORT.DOG 13 Left turns from Sullivan Avenue onto the site access drive will operate at LOS B during the Friday midday and Friday afternoon peak hours and LOS A during the Saturday midday peak hour. The site access drive approach to Sullivan Avenue will operate at LOS F during the Friday midday peak hour and LOS D during the Friday afternoon Peak Hour and LOS C during the Saturday midday peak hour. Queues on Sullivan Avenue will be no greater than one vehicle at any time and the 95th percentile queue on the site drive will be 92 feet during the Friday midday peak hour, 47 feet during the Friday afternoon peak hour and 36 feet during the Saturday midday peak hour. All sight distances available to drivers entering and leaving the mixed use site exceed the distances presented in the Connecticut DOT 2003 Highway Design Manual for the 85th percentile travel speeds on Sullivan Avenue. These sight distances will allow drivers the visibility needed to safely enter and leave the site. Recommendations: To facilitate access to the site this study recommends that Sullivan Avenue be restriped to create an eastbound left turn lane for vehicles turning from Sullivan Avenue onto the site access drive. This lane can be created within the area that is presently a painted median on Sullivan Avenue. C:\BUSINESS\NERETAILLEASING\REPORT.DOC 14 APPENDIX EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 route 194 at Sullivan Ave Plaza/Colony S (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3651 youth Windsor, Connecticut Site Code : 00003651 Start Date : 07/30/2004 Page No : 2 _.._..----- - - .------------ ---.___.. - --- -- ------ ---------n-------------._.. ---- _._...._.._..� Colony Shops Route 194 Sullivan Avenue Plaza Route 194 From North From East From South From West Start Rig Thr Le�PeApp. Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig Thr Left Ped App. Int. Time ht u ht u s l Total I ht u s Total ht u s Total Total eak Hour From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 i Intersecti 12:30 PM on � Volume 65 3 77 0 145 71 498 80 3 652 93 10 67 0 1701 71 496 47 0 614 1581 44. 53. 10. 76, 12. 0.5 54. 5.9 39. 0.0 11. 80. 7.7 0.0 Percent 8 2.1 1 0.0 9 4 3 i 7 4 6 8 12:45 23 0 20 0 43 17 129 17 0 163� 26 3 15 0 44I 17 136 10 0 163 413 Volume i ( 0.957 Peak Factor High Int. 12:45 PM 101:15 PM 1 12:30 PM 12:45 PM I Volume 23 0 20 0 431 18 126 24 0 1681 28 4 22 0 541 17 136 10 C 163 Peak 0.84 0.971 0.781 0.94 Factor 3 i 01 71 21 Colony Shops Out In Total 128 145 I 2731 I 651 31 77 0 Right Thru Left Peds I I �F North ID a, 3 --?A I OD m fO /301200412:30:00 PM 0 m 'o r t /30/20041:15:00 PM ^' to t � o 0 Unshrfted t O co o a m N W_ T r FL eft Inru RI ht Peds 67 10 93 0 154 170 324 out In Total Sullivan Avenue Plaza CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 ,oute 194 at Sullivan Ave Plaza/Colony S (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3652 outh Windsor, Connecticut Site, Code : 00003652 Start Date : 07/30/2004 Page No : 2 ---- - - -— Colony Shops Route 194 _ Sullivan Avenue Plaza Route 1 S4 I From North From East From South From West Start Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig Thr Left Ped App. Rig Thr Left PAed App. Rig Thr Left Ped App. Int. Time ht u s Total ht u s Totai ht u Total ht u s Total Total ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersecti on 04:15 PM 1 Volume 31 4 41 0 76 64 467 118 1 650 95 10 66 0 171 63 569 41 0 673 1570 71. 18. 55. 38. 84• Percent 40.8 5.3 9 53. 0.0 I 9.8 8 2 0.2 i 6 5.8 6 0.0 9.4 5 6.1 0.0 04:15 6 3 8 0 17 12 136 34 0 182� 29 2 13 0 44 14 143 4 0 161 404 Volume ( 1 0.972 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 04:15 PM 1 04:30 PM 04:45 PM I Volume 8 1 15 0 24 12 136 34 0 1821 22 5 27 0 54 14 144 20 0 178 Peak 0.79 0.891 0.79 0.94 Factor 2 31 2 5 U61---Y9F0p—S F out In TdIal 1-15 76 L 1911 I 311 4 41 0 Right Thru Left Peds I ~ F. I I I m rri IvI � ;0�? tliO i North � (0I2 c m ° /30/20044:15:00 PM O1„ o Cl) /30/2004 5:00:00 PM r OD Unshifted o O 0 o w v m a 4-, f F+ Left Thru Ri ht Pods 66 10 95 0 185 171 Out In Total Sullivan Avenue Plaza CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 ute 194 at Sullivan Ave Plaza/Colony S (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3650 uth Windsor, Connecticut Site Code 00003653 Start Date 07/31/2004 Page No : 2 Colony Shops Route 194 Sullivan Avenue e PLaza Route 194 From North ....... From.. .-East From South From West Start Rig Thr Ped Ped App. -Rig Thr Pe d App. i Rig Thr Ped App. Int. Time ht I Left s Total ht u Left s Total ht u Left s Total Total I I u I I ak Hour From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak I of 1 nterseconti 11:45 AM Volume . 48 5 52 0 105 62 391 69 1 523 93 14 53 0 160 43 449 44 0 536 1324 Percent 45. 4.8 49, 0.0 11. 74. 13. 0.2 58. 8.8 33. 0.0 8.0 83- 8.2 0.0 7 5 9 8 2 1 1 8 12.15 18 0 11 0 29 15 105 18 0 138 32 3 14 0 49 6 127 10 0 143 359 Volume Peak 10.922 Factor I I 1 High Int. 11:45 AM j 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 12:15 PM I Volume 8 4 17 0 29 15 105 18 0 138 32 3 14 0 491 6 127 10 0 1431 Peak 0.90 0.94 0.81 0.931 Factor 5 j 7 . 61 71 Colony Shops out In Total F-2-2-5] 1 481 51 521 0 Right Thru Left Peds 4-1 I 4 00 Z + 0 North HE 7/31/2004 11.45:00 AM 5- Cl)- 7/31/2004 12:30:00 PM r C.) 0 0) 'S W41 1 Unshifted Co 0 0 CL M 0- 4-1 Left Thru Right _Peds_ 1 531 14 931 01 117 160 277 Out In Total Sullivan Avenue PLaza CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 oute 194 at Ayers Road (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3653 outh Windsor, Connecticut Site Code : 00003653 Start Date : 07/30/2004 Page No : 2 --- _ .............Ayers Road Route R6ute i ---- From North From East From South From West Start Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. Int. Time ht u Left s Total ht u Left I s Total ' ht u Left s Total ht u Left s Total Total ak Hour From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 ntersecti 12:30 PM on Volume 82 0 89 0 171 31 590 0 0 621 0 0 0 0 01 0 570 117 1 688 1480 Percent 48. 0.0 52. 0.0 5.0 95. 82. 17.0.0 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.1 flm Volume 25 0 29 0 54 5 135 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 153 32 0 185 379 e Peak i ' 0.976 Factor I High Int. 01:00 PM 12:45 PM j 11:15:00 AM j 01:00 PM Volume 25 0 29 0 54 4 165 0 0 1691 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 32 0 185 Peak 0.79 I 0.91 i 0.93 Factor 2 9 1 i 0 Ayers Road Out In Total 148F 1 11 319 821 891 0 Right Left Peds i I i � I I o HE North — F c) ro I o� 1 0 m m u)t / /30/200412:30:00 PM a rn g CD o ~ 130/20041:15:00 PM c N N a Unsh'dted � o ' W O H.- - CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 oute 194 at Ayers Road (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3649 uth Windsor, Connecticut Site Code : 00003649 Start Date : 07/30/2004 Page No : 2 Ayers Road Route 194 Route 194 From North From East From South From West Start Rig Thr Ped I App. Rig Thr Ped j App. Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. fnt. Time ht u Left s Total ht u Left s Total ht u f Left s Total ht u Left s Total Total ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 ntersectf 05:00 PM on Volume 65 0 134 0 199 10 587 0 3 600 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 577 148 0 7251 1524 32. 67. 97. 0.0 79. 20. 0.0 Percent 7 0.0 3 0.0 ` Volume 1.7 8 0.0 0.5 , 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 4 05:00 14 0 26 0 40 2 159 0 2 163 0 0 0 0 01 0 140 44 0 184 387 Peak ' 0.984 Factor High Int. 05:45 PM 05:00 PM 3:45:00 PM 1 05:00 PM Volume 21 0 49 0 70 2 159 0 2 163 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0 140 44 0 184 Peak 0.71 I 0.92 ! 0.98 Factor l 01 5 , Ayers Road Out In Total 1581 357 r 1 i I I 651 1341_ 01 Right Left Peds I f � I i co46 r-I O F� I c -j North T V 3� _ roc^ �t--► /30/2004 5:00:00 PM 4 ODo 'o ~ /30/2004 5.45:00 PM v o cD _0 N O Unshdted Q a w IL"II d CONNECTICUT COUNTS INC. KENSINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06037 oute 194 at Ayers Road (860) 828-1693 File Name : 3648 outh Windsor, Connecticut Site Code : 00003650 Start Date : 07/31/2004 Page No : 2 - -----7- ..--------.. ---- --------- _ -- Ayeersrs Road Route 194 � Route 194 I From North From East I From South From West Start Rig I Thr I Ped I App. Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. Rig Thr Ped App. Int. Time ht u Left s Total ht u Left s Total ht u Left s Total ht I u Left sl Total I Total ak Hour From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 ntersecti 11:45 AM I I on 1 Volume 107 0 111 0 218 12 414 0 1 427 0 0 0 0 01 0 495 108 0 603 1248 49. 50. 97. 82. 17. Percent 1 0.0 9 0.0 2.8 0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 9 0.0 12:00 33 0 28 0 61 2 106 0 0 1081 0 0 0 0 01 0 134 40 0 1741 343 Volume Peak I 10.910 Factor j High Int. 11:45 AM 1 12:15 PM 111:15:00 AM 12:00 PM Volume 34 0 33 0 671 7 109 0 1 117 I 0 0 0 0 01 0 134 40 0 1741 Peak 0.81 0.91 I 0.86 Factor 3 2 ! 6 Ayers Road Out In Total 120 218 I I 1071 111 0; 1 Right Left Peds I n s l ? 'o North 3 N rn m e m v 2c ► /31/200411:45:00)k-m— A A 'o ~ /31l200412:30:00 PM =i o � v a I a°i Unshifted o O I LJ° V wm w— Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code: 434 South Windsor, Connecticut Station ID: Eastbound _ _ — __ ___ _____ _____ ___ _ _ _ __ Latitude: 0'0.000 Undefined Start 0 16 21 26 71 36 41 46 b1 —56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Percent Percent 08/04/04 * * * w w w w x w x x w w x x w w 01:00 x x x x w w w w w x w w w w w w x 02:00 x x w x w w w x w w w x w w w x x 03:00 x x x w x w w x w w x x w x w x w 04:00 * w w w w w w w w w w w w w w x x 05:00 x x x w x w x x w w w w w w w w w 06:00 w w w w w x w x w x w w w w w x x 07:00 x w x w x w x w w w w w w w x w x 08:00 x w x w x x w w w w w w w w w x x 09:00 w w w x w x x x w w x x w w w x w 10:00 x x x x x x x x w w w w w w w w x 11:00 x w x x x w w w w w w w w w w x w 12 PM * * w x x x w w w x w w w w x x w 13:00 14:00 x x w w x x w w x w w w x x x w w 15:00 2 1 10 91 280 179 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 600 39 41 16:00 1 5 8 73 289 215 40 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 634 39 42 17:00 4 6 12 80 323 212 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 672 39 41 18:00 0 1 7 76 199 148 36 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 468 39 42 19:00 0 0 9 49 168 136 33 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 399 40 43 20:00 1 2 4 30 153 114 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 40 43 21:00 1 1 0 9 45 70 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 40 44 22:00 2 1 1 4 29 40 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 42 45 23:00 0 0 2 1 7 23 20 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 59 45 48 Total 11 17 53 413 1493 1137 266 26 2 0 0 0 0 2 3420 Percent 0.3% 0.5% 1.5% 12.1% 43.7% 33.2.% 7.8% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% AM Peak Volume _ PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 20:00 23:00 15:00 17:00 Volume 4 6 12 91 323 215 40 5 2 2 672 Page 1 Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code: 434 South Windsor, Connecticut Station ID: Eastbound __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ Latitude: 0'0.000 Undefined Start 0 16 21 26 31 —36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th Time 15 _ 20 _ 25 30 35 __40 _ 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999_ _Total Percent Percent 08/05/04 0 0 0 0 8 10— 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 28 43 45 01:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 44 45 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 43 45 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 43 44 04:00 0 0 0 1 8 10 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 43 45 05:00 0 0 4 3 32 31 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 42 45 06:00 0 1 9 30 79 83 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 40 43 07:00 0 1 5 34 122 125 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 319 40 43 08:00 6 11 14 53 185 101 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 39 42 09:00 0 0 4 55 191 124 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 403 39 42 10:00 0 3 24 65 171 137 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 424 39 41 11:00 3 2 34 83 200 133 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 39 42 12 PM 0 1 20 130 254 142 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 38 40 13:00 0 1 18 65 215 154 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 485 39 42 14:00 1 2 23 83 236 132 16 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 497 38 40 15:00 1 4 16 68 241 177 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 538 39 41 16:00 6 14 20 86 235 215 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 612 39 41 17:00 2 5 33 120 343 178 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 706 38 40 18:00 3 7 24 112 274 156 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 599 38 40 19:00 0 0 2 72 197 118 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 415 39 41 20:00 0 0 4 31 154 103 26 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 321 40 43 21:00 0 0 1 16 61 59 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 42 45 22:00 0 0 2 16 24 48 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 103 40 44 23:00 0 0 0 3 12 20 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 45 48 Total 22 52 _ 257 _ 1126__ 3247 2279 _ 497 54 4 0 1 0_ 1 0 7540 Percent 0.3% 0.7%% 3.4% 14.9% 43.1% 30.2% 6.6%---0.7%--- 0.1% - 0.0% 0.0% -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%-- --- AM Peak 08:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 07:00 06:00 00:00 01:00 11:00 Volume 6 11 34 83 200 137 32 4 1 1 486 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 17:00 12:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 23:00 1400 17:00 17:00 Volume 6 14 33 130 343 215 34 9 1 1 706 Page 2 Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code:434 South Windsor, Connecticut Station ID: Eastbound _ ______ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Latitude: 0' 0.000 Undefined Start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th _Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Percent Percent 08/06/04 ---0------ 0 --- 0 ---_ 0 — 2 —._—._12__..-____-12_....----� . .� � o 0 ---- 0 0 - 27 44 45 01:00 1 0 0 0 5 8 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 43 46 02:00 0 0 0 0 2 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 43 44 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 45 46 04:00 0 0 0 1 10 16 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 45 48 05:00 0 1 3 3 27 33 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 43 46 06:00 3 0 7 18 57 85 29 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 203 41 44 07:00 0 3 10 32 117 148 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 352 40 43 08:00 0 0 16 64 160 111 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 374 39 41 09:00 1 4 9 67 211 106 30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 431 39 42 10:00 1 12 30 81 186 150 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 39 41 11:00 0 2 11 80 193 160 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 481 39 42 12 PM 0 5 19 78 240 172 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 533 39 40 13:00 4 2 13 74 231 161 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 515 39 41 14:00 « w w w w w « w w w w w x « w w w 15:00 « « « w « « « « w w « « « w w w w 16:00 w w w « w w w « w w w w w w w w w 17:00 « « « w w « w « w w w « « w w w w 18:00 w w w w w w x w x w w w « w w w w 19:00 w w « w « « « w w w w w « « w w w 20:00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 21:00 « « w w w w w w w « « « w w w w w 22:00 w « w w w w « w « w w w w w w w w 23:00 Total 10 29 118 — 498 1442 1173— 290 _ 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 3595 Percent 0.3% 0.8% 3.3% 13.9% 40.1% 32.6% 8.1% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ---- ---- --- —...-- -.._.. ----._._,.__. . -- .,. ----....__------- ----.._..------------..._ AM Peak 06:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 09:00 11:00 07:00 04:00 06:00 10:00 Volume 3 12 30 81 211 160 38 _ 6 1 __ _ _ _ _ _ _____ 486 PM Peak 13:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 - — 12:00 _Volume 4 5 19 — 78 240 172 28 2 533 Grand 43 98 428 2037 6182 4589 1053 114 7 0 1 0 1 2 14555 Total Percent 0.3% _ 0.7% 2.9% 14.0%_ 42.5% 31.5% 7.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile 29 MPH 50th Percentile: 34 MPH 85th Percentile: 39 MPH 95th Percentile: 43 MPH Statistics 10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH Number in Pace: 10771 Percent in Pace: 74.0% Number of Vehicles>40 MPH: 1178 Percent of Vehicles>40 MPH: 8.1% Mean Speed(Average): 34 MPH Statistics Mean Speed(Average): 34 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH Number in Pace: 10771 Percent in Pace: 74.0% Page 3 IrVIIIIv"IkIutVVulfLO un+. Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code: 434 Station ID: South Windsor, Connecticut Westbound _ Latitude: 0'0.000 Undefined Start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 - 66 71 76 85th 95th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Percent Percent 08/04/04 * x x x * * w w * w w w w x 01:00 * x x x w w x w w w x w x x x x 02:00 * w w w w w x x x x x w w w w w w 0 :00 * * x x x x x x x x x x w w x x x 04:00 * * w x w w w x x w x w x w w w w 05:00 * x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 06:00 w * * * * x w x w w w w w x x w w 07:00 * * x w w x x x x x x x x x w x x 0 :00 * * w w x x x x w w w w w w x x x w w w w x x x w x x x x w x x w 09:00 10:00 x w x w x w w x w x x x 11:00 * * x w x x w w w w w x x x w w 12 PM * x w w x w x w w w w x w 13:00 * * * x x x x x x x x x x x 14:00 * * w x w w w x x x w w w w x x w 15:00 0 2 11 28 137 221 118 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 528 43 45 16:00 0 0 0 14 155 211 136 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 542 43 45 17:00 0 0 2 43 194 206 132 26 1 0 0 0 0 1 604 43 45 18:00 0 0 0 30 125 164 119 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 453 43 45 19:00 0 1 1 14 158 146 79 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 42 45 20:00 1 0 2 20 78 114 77 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 43 45 21:00 0 0 0 3 25 84 73 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 203 45 47 22:00 0 0 3 0 8 40 50 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 114 45 48 23:00 0 0 0 0 4 14 25 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 47 49 Total 1 3 19 152--884— 1200 _ 809 — 129 9 — _—_2 0 __— 0—_. 0 1 — 3209 Percent 0.0% 0.1% 0.6% 4.7% 27.5% 37.4% 25.2% 4.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak Volume ------- PM Peak 20.00 15.00 15-.00 17:00 17:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 17:00 17:0 Volume 1 2 11 43 194 221 136 25 3 1 1 604 Page 5 UQHHUk;UL;ULV+UUIILb IIIU. Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code: 434 South Windsor, Connecticut Station ID: Westbound Latitude: 0'0.000 Undefined 21-- 66 76 85th 9 Start 0 16 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Percent Percent 08/05/04 0 0 1 1 1 9 6------- 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 23 47 51 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 46 47 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 45 46 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 46 48 04:00 0 0 0 2 6 10 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 45 48 05:00 0 0 0 3 22 38 47 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 132 46 49 06:00 0 0 0 4 48 98 100 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 269 44 47 07:00 0 0 1 27 106 152 103 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 43 45 08:00 0 1 1 19 117 178 96 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 43 45 09:00 0 0 0 11 137 144 83 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 398 43 46 10:00 0 0 1 27 129 162 82 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 416 43 45 11:00 1 0 1 33 149 194 100 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 485 42 45 12 PM 0 0 1 50 143 214 96 16 1 2 0 0 0 0 523 42 45 13:00 0 0 4 35 116 175 118 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 43 45 14:00 0 0 6 41 158 181 114 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 524 43 45 15:00 0 1 0 30 141 244 124 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 570 43 46 16:00 0 0 4 55 180 229 134 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 619 43 45 17:00 0 0 11 45 219 277 125 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 693 42 45 18:00 0 0 0 18 165 190 95 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 480 42 45 19:00 0 0 3 35 178 141 65 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 431 41 44 20:00 0 0 0 24 99 122 65 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 317 42 45 21:00 0 0 1 5 26 73 92 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 217 45 48 22:00 0 0 0 2 10 25 33 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 45 48 23:00 0 0 0 1 1 20 27 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 65 47 50 Total 2 2 35 468 2152 2890 1746 320 19 3 0 1 0 0 7638 Percent 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 6.1% 28.2% 37.8% 22.9% 4.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 03:00 08:00 00:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 00:00 11:00 Volume 1 1 1 33 149 194 103 22 3 1 485 PM Peak 15:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 17:00 Volume 1 11 55 219 277 134 30 2 2 693 Page 6 UUI111CGLIL;UL%.UUIILO 111%,. Kensington, Connecticut 06037 1000 Sullivan Avenue (860) 828-1693 Site Code: 434 South Windsor, Connecticut Station ID: _Westbound — Latitude: 0' 0.000 Undefined -------------------- ------------ — -- ------- Start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 466 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th _Time 15 20 _ 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Percent Percent ------------------- ---- ---.____-'-' . --.._.-. __._.---.-.... ------ .-..__-------- -------------- 08/06/04 0 — 0 0 0 4 5 12 1 0 0 0- 0 0 0 22 44 45 01:00 0 0 1 1 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 47 48 02:00 0 0 0 1 1 5 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 22 48 50 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 4 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 47 49 04:00 0 0 0 0 4 12 19 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 47 50 05:00 0 0 0 2 8 43 45 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 114 45 49 06:00 0 0 0 6 70 92 80 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 278 45 48 07:00 0 1 1 18 108 174 107 23 3 1 0 0 0 0 436 44 46 08:00 0 0 4 23 103 168 95 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 404 43 45 09:00 0 0 3 25 106 148 85 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 43 46 10:00 0 0 1 21 123 174 104 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 451 44 46 11:00 0 1 4 36 132 196 100 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 495 43 46 12 PM 1 2 2 30 165 217 100 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 543 43 45 13:00 0 0 7 38 146 215 107 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 529 42 45 14:00 * * * * * * * 15:00 16:00 * * * * * * 17:00 19:00 20:00 * * * * * * * 21:00 22:00 * * * * * * * 23:00 Total 2 4 23 — 201 970 _1454 880 221 _ 9_ — _1— —_0_—_ 0_ 0 0 3765 Percent 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 5.3% 25.8% 38.6% 23.4% 5.9% 0 2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 03:00 07:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 Volume 1 1 4 36 132 _ 195 _ 107 29 _ 3 _ 1 _ ____ ----- --495 _ PM Peak 12:00 12:00 13:00 _ 13:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Volume 1 2 7 38 165 217 107 25 1 543 Grand 5 g 77 821 4006 5544 3435 670 37 6 0 1 0 1 14612 Total Percent_ _0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 5.6% 27.4% 37.9% 23.5% 4.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile: 32 MPH 50th Percentile: 38 MPH 85th Percentile: 43 MPH 95th Percentile: 45 MPH Statistics 10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH Number in Pace: 9550 Percent in Pace: 65.4% Number of Vehicles>40 MPH: 4150 Percent of Vehicles>40 MPH: 28.4% Mean Speed(Average): 38 MPH Statistics Mean Speed(Average): 38 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH Number in Pace: 9550 Percent in Pace: 65.4% Page 7 TRAFFIC FLOW DIAGRAMS Sullivan Avenue Ayers Road � o N J ID - Colony Shops �— t G6/ P 3 I (4 /) 7 _� Sullivan Avenue Plaza� E4 g j 1,3 L`L', ' xxx Midday Peak Mixed Use Plaza (xxx) PM Peak 1000 Sullivan Avenue [xxx] Saturday Midday Peak Existing Traffic Volumes TmMe Envineeft Sofutiens,P.C. LZ Sullivan Avenue Ayers Road i I-j 15,1 CIJ�) �3 L r-/// � (c,"9', 9- 6, <S- Colony Shops 7� -j 13) Sullivan Avenue Plaza xxx Midday Peak Mixed Use Plaza (xxx) PM Peak 1000 Sullivan Avenue [xxx] Saturday Midday Peak 2006 NO-Build Traffic Volumes TrAc Engineering Solutions,F.C. Sullivan Avenue Ayers Road + Site Drive '761 07, Colony Shops Sullivan Avenue Plaza + xxx Midday Peak Mixed Use Plaza (xxx) PM Peak 1000 Sullivan Avenue [xxxl Saturday Midday Peak Trip Distribution Traffic Egg neefim Solutions,P.C. Sullivan 4 Avenue Ayers Road L Site Drive � 70 1.f; LSZJ Colony Shops Sullivan Avenue Plaza LI xxx Midday Peak Mixed Use Plaza (xxx) PM Peak 1000 Sullivan Avenue [xxx] Saturday Midday Peak Trip Assignment !!silk Engineering sotutions,'.C. Sullivan Avenue Ayers Road f// 13 9,3 ,rlll_7 (�S) L Q� Site Drive -7 0 (3 7 Y71 Colony kn 4 /0 00) E115-1 Shops \A f- "s 47 14-3 go Sullivan Avenue Plaza -q) 3 xxx Midday Peak Mixed Use Plaza (xxx) PM Peak 1000 Sullivan Avenue [xxx] Saturday Midday Peak 2006 Build Traffic Volumes TMMC EnOneefing UMIGHS,P.C. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES 2004 EXISTING CONDITIONS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops tt8/15I2004 •r-- It. t 41 Le Lane Configurations ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Grade;(%) 0% 0% 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 .0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 30 - 50 50 50 50 54 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1888 0 1770 1888 0 0 1649 1777 0 1795 1599 Flt Permitted 0.443 0.189 0.712 0.685 - Satd. Flow(perm) 798 1888 0 352 1888 0 0 1225 1777 0 1289 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 13 19 119 77 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 _ 30 Link Distance(ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 47 496 71 80 498 71 67 10 93 77 3 65 Lane Group flow(vph) 50 604 0 82 586 0 0 99 119 0 96 77 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total.Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effet Green (s) 37.0 37.0 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.53 0:53 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.60 0.25 0.50 0.30 0.21 0.27 0.16 control Delay 11.1 15.6 2.6 6.9 23.2 5.5 22.7 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 15.6 2.6 6.9 23.2 5.5 22.7 6.4 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 15.3 6.4 13.5 15.4 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 184 4 118 34 0 32 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 299 m4 100 61 24 65 25 Internal Link gist(ft) 1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 422 1004 380 1167 333 569 350 490 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiflback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced�v//c Ratio}g 0.12 0.60 0.22 0.50 0.30 0.21 0.27 0.16 --------------- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Friday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/1512004 Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Signal i�elay:11.6 Intersection LOS: 1`3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(mm) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue&Colony Shops i s2 .3 e4 s 1V 06 08 Friday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8/15/2004 Larte 4� Ei3L EBT ART ��BR �SBtx :SIR - Lane Configurations t t F IdealFlow(vphpt) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length(ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 2111 -1925 1742 1770 .1794 Flt Permitted 0.155 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) "289 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 - Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 34 104 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance(ft) 942 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 117 570 590 31 89 82 Lane Group Flow(vph) 126 613 648 34 113 104 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.3 33.3 20.0 20.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.48 0.71 0.04 0.22 0.18 Control Delay 7.1 8.2 21.1 4.6 20.6 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.1 8.2 21.1 4.6 20.6 5.4 LOS A A C A C A Approach Delay 8.0 20.3 13.3 Approach LOS A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 188 223 0 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m17 149 #355 14 64 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 280 130 , 130 Base Capacity(vph) 324 1267 916 847 506 587 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.48 0.71 0.04 0.22 0.18 trfterseet+ort SU�tlrTla� - ._� < .:: Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT,Start of Yellow - Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Friday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1—. Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 8/15/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 95f1 percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered,by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue&Ayers Road — e4 s o6 o7 .. 1_ Friday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8f15f2004 L`a� oUp E,-- EIVT � W WET 1 t(( l t fVBT I BF- . . 1 L... . .. Lane Configurations *T F Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Grade (0/6) 0% . 0% 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 150 50 50 50 50 50 - 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1896 0 1770 1890 0 0 1549 1777 0 1799 1599 Fit Permitted 0.439 0.136 0.738 0.737 Satd. Flow(perm) 790 1896 0 253 1890 0 0 1270 1777 0 1387 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 10 18 120 39 Link Speed (mph) 40 -40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 41 569 63 118 467 54 66 10 95 41 4 31 Lane Group Flow(vph) 44 672 0 133 597 0 0 97 120 0 57 39 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 34.3 34.3 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 vIc Ratio 0.11 0.72 0.45 0.51 0.28 0.21 0.15 0.08 Control Delay 12.2 20.9 7.0 -7.2 22.9 5.5 20.7 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.2 20.9 7.0 7.2 22.9 5.5 20.7 7.6 LOS B C A A C A C A Approach Delay 20.3 7.2 13.2 15.4 Approach LOS C A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 224 6 136 33 0 19 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 #417 m11 103 60 25 39 16 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity (vph) 387 934 331 1168 345 570 376 462 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iReducedyYq v/c Ratio 0.11 0.72 0.40 0..51 0.28 0.21 - - 0.15 - 0.08 Area Type: - Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 - Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated - Friday Afternoon Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Maximum We Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS, B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min} 15 #i 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two.cycles: m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops o2 it .3 29 s77 06 0 23 i AT Friday Afternoon Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 8/15/2004 4,_ L1t13ectuBL. .. BT.-. VTR Sal,, :°,BR._. Lane Configurations I t t r I r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing`Detector(ft) D - 0 0 0 0 D Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Fit Permitted 0.163 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 304 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 11 92 - Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance (ft) 942 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume(vph) 148 577 587 10 134 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 151 589 638 11 189 92 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.2 33.2 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.46 0.70 0.01 0.37 0.16 Control Delay 7.5 6.8 20.8 6.2 22.6 5.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.5 6.8 20.8 6.2 22.6 5.6 LOS A A C A C A Approach Delay 5.9 20.5 17.1 Approach LOS A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 135 220 0 65 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 106 344 8 88 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity (vph) 331 1267 913 832 506 578 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.70 0.01 0.37 0.16 Irateraeotion Summary.Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.70 Friday Afternoon Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8115/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.9 Intersection LOS: 8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m t olume for 95th';percentile queue is metered by upstream signal; Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road —F ,4 46 06 � 07 ®8 24 111 1 1343 s Friday Afternoon Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Latte rs up F L ESl' EAR 1t ElL .itti6T w-', NBL '_ >`lBT> Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 00/0 0% 29/O -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading;Detector{ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1900 0 1770 1884 0 0 1656 1777 0 1800 1599 Flt Permitted 0.488 0.249 0.765 _ 0.739 Said. Flow(perm) 879 1900 0 464 1884 0 0 1317 1777 0 1390 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 9 21 115 53 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 44 449 43 59 391 52 53 14 93 52 5 48 Lane Group Flow(vph) 47 529 0 73 482 0 0 82 115 0 64 53 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 5 6 Total Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 36.9 36.9 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.53 0.19 0.41 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.11 Control Delay 11.0 14.3 2.9 6.7 22.0 5.5 21.0 7.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.0 14.3 2.9 6.7 22.0 5.5 21.0 7.0 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 14.0 6.2 12.4 14.6 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 154 4 155 27 0 21 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 251 m6 115 54 27 49 24 Intemat Link Dist(ft) 1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 463 1005 436 1165 357 566 377 473 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.53 0.17 0.41 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.11 �er€ Area Type: - Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Saturday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.9 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A AnalYsO Period(min).`15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue&Colony Shops i' .2 63 --► a4 121`s1 34.3s •1 s6 m8 _ 4 ` Saturday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8/15/2004 41- Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length(ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 i 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 - 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd:Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Fit Permitted 0.295 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 550 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 13 137 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance:(ft) 942 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 112 515 431 12 115 111 Lane Group Flow(vph) 130 599 474 13 142 137 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split(s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.2 33.2 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.47 0.52 0.02 0.28 0.22 Control Delay 5.5 9.1 16.3 6.1 21.3 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.6 9.1 16.3 6.1 21.3 5.0 LOS A A B A C A Approach Delay 8.5 16.0 13.3 Approach LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 185 145 0 47 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 176 230 9 _80 28 Internal Link Dist(ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 454 1267 914 834 506 610 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.47 0.52 0.02 0.28 0.22 Area Type: Other Cycle',Length:,70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.52 Saturday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers-Road 8/15/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 45..3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period {min} 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 46 s 06 "� o7 08 24 --77111.7 34.3 s Saturday Midday Peak-2004 Existing Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES 2006 NO-BUILD CONDITIONS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8f15J20o4 LA Lane Configurations " T. # Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Grade:(%) 00/0 0% 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft 50 50 50 50 - 50 50 50 50 :50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(Prot) 1711 1888 0 1770 1888 0 0 1649 1777 0 1795 1599 Fft Permitted 0.434 0.170 0.706 6 680 Satd. Flow(perm) 781 1888 0 317 1888 0 0 1215 1777 0 1279 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 13 19 124 81 Link Speed (mph) 40-- 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time(s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 49 515 74 83 518 74 70 10 97 80 3 58 Lane Group Flow(vph) 52 628 0 86 610 0 0 103 124 0 99 81 Turn Type Perm Pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total_Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 37.0 37.0 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v1c Ratio 0.13 0.63 0.28 0.52 0.31 0.22 0.29 0.16 Control Delay 11.3 16.2 2.9 7.2 23.5 5.4 22.9 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.3 16.2 2.9 7.2 23.5 5.4 22.9 6.3 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 15.8 6.6 13.6 15.4 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 196 4 121 35 0 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 319 m4 121 64 25 66 25 internal Link Dist(ft) -,1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 413 :1004 363 1167 330 573 347 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.63 0.24 0.52 _ 0.31 0.22 0.29 0.16 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length:: 70 Offset: 36(51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type; Actuated-Coordinated Friday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.63 lntersection Signal Delay: 11.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min):15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue&Colony Shops tz2 lf- .3 - A 3s. . ' 121 3d 9 s t" 06 wo 777777 S. I I Friday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8I15/2004 ." 4Q fL_ _ ) ' .. T. 1t�fl_ Lane Configurations r € Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length(ft) _290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0' 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 SAW.Flow(prot) _1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Fit Permitted 0.134 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 250 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) -35 108 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link.Distance(ft) 942 4754 2008 - Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 122 593 614 32 93 85 Lane Group Flow(vph) 131 638 675 35 118 108 Turn;Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted'Phases 4 8 6 Total Split(s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.3 33.3 20.0 20.0 Actuated gtC Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.50 0.74 0.04 0.23 0.18 Control Delay 8.9 8.3 22.3 4.5 20.7 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.9 8.3 22.3 4.5 20.7 5.4 LO:S A A C A C A Approach Delay 8.4 21.5 13.4 Approach LOS A C B - Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 197 238 0 39 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m16 149 #420 14 67 24 Internal Link Dist (ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay:Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 304 1267 916 847 506 590 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.50 0.74 0.04 0.23 0.18 thfo�toh�un`ar� y = - Area Type: Other Cycle _ength: 7ff Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1_(1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT,Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0,74 Friday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8�18/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity.Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume,exceeds capacity:queue may be,longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal: Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue&Ayers Road --► m4 40 . m6 �" m7 08 1'1_ g4.9 s' Friday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Lane Configurations T* ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Gracie(%) t)% 0°/0 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 .50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) Is 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1896 0 1770 1890 0 0 1649 1777 0 1799 1599 Fit Permitted 0.429 0.115 0.734 0.732 Satd. Flow(perm) 772 1896 0 214 1890 0 0 1263 1777 0 1377 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes - Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 10 18 125 41 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 43 592 66 123 486 67 69 10 99 43 4 32 Lane Group Flow(vph) 46 700 0 138 621 0 0 100 125 0 59 41 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 34.2 34.2 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.75 0.50 0.53 0.29 0.22 0.16 0.09 Control Delay 12.3 22.3 9.2 6.8 23.1 5.4 20.9 7.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.3 22.3 9.2 6.8 23.1 5.4 20.9 7.5 LOS B C A A C A C A Approach Delay 21.7 7.2 13.3 15.4 Approach LOS C A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 239 6 143 34 0 19 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 #448 m13 m122 62 26 41 17 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 378 933 312 1168 343 573 374 464 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce(�dtyv/c Ratio 0.12 _0.75 0.44 0.53 0.29 0.22 0.16 0.09 Area Type:: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min} 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles: m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops t e2 v4 23s, 12s1 s 349s *' mB 08 23 0479 Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 8/15/2004 ►.CiI iCT-3�7'(--Q - �i:ilr EL7T ��T �� �L�. :+17Pt7 _> .._ --r -: ,_.... _ ,: ....�..3x:..__r Lane Configurations Idea(Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) D 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 %td.Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Flt Permitted 0.142 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) - 265 .2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 11 96 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance-(ft) 942 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 154 600 611 10 139 68 Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 612 664 11 196 95 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 31.3 31.3 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.48 0.77 0.01 0.39 0.17 Control Delay 10.1 6.9 24.3 6.2 22.9 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.1 6.9 24.3 6.2 22.9 5.5 LOS B A C A C A Approach Delay 7.5 24.0 17.2 Approach LOS A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 136 233 0 67 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 114 #383 8 92 17 Internal Link Dist(ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay Length(ft) 290 .280 130 130 Base Capacity (vph) 312 1267 860 784 506 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.48 0.77 0.01 0.39 0.17 )tlterseet�an Summary _ Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 - Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 8/15/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity:queue may be longer: Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume.for 95th;percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 46 s <� mg '� m? 24 1 s 349s` Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops f8115/2004 Lane Configurations +T + Ideal#=tow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Gr�C1e_(%) 0% 0% 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 --50 50 -50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1900 0 1770 1884 0 0 1556 1777 0 1800 1599 Flt Permitted 0.479 _0.232 - 0.764 0.733 Satd. Flow(perm) 863 1900 0 432 1884 0 0 1315 1777 0 1379 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 9 21 120 56 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 942 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 16.1 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 46 467 45 72 407 65 55 15 97 54 5 50 Lane Group flow(vph) 49 550 0 77 502 0 0 87 120 0 66 56 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split(S) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effet Green (s) 36.8 36.8 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.55 0.20 0.43 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.12 Control Delay 11 A 14.8 3.1 7.0 22.2 5.5 21.1 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 14.8 3.1 7.0 22.2 5.5 21.1 6.9 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 14.5 6.5 12.5 14.6 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 164 5 164 29 0 22 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 266 m7 141 57 27 51 24 Internal Link'Dist(ft) -1872 862 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 454 1003 420 1165 357 570 374 475 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.55 0.18 0.43 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.12 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 Offset: 36(51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Saturday Midday Peak- 2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 8/15/2004 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.55 Intersection.Signal Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops e►2 m3 --1► m4 = : eF6 0,9 4: Saturday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 8/15/2004 Lane Configurations t t r I Ideal Fiow(vphpl) 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 _4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 p Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Said.Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Fit Permitted 0.295 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 550 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd Flow(RTOR) 13 137 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance(ft) 942 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 16.1 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 112 515 431 12 115 111 Lane Group Flow(vph) 130 599 474 13 142 137 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 ActEffet Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.2 33.2 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.29 v%Ratio 0.29 0.47 0.52 0.02 0.28 0.22 Control Delay 5.4 8.9 16.3 6.1 21.3 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.4 8.9 16.3 6.1 21.3 5.0 LOS A A B A C A Approach Delay 8.3 16.0 13.3 Approach;LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 188 145 0 47 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 157 230 9 80 28 Internal Link Dist(ft) 862 4674 1928 Turn Bay Length (f#) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 454 1267 914 834 506 610 Starvation Cap RedUctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.47 0.52 0.02 0.28 0.22 tntec�wn Su[nrt�r� - Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (10/6),,Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and8:WBT,Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Saturday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 8/15/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection dipacity Utilization 45.30% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 46 s 86 o7 r�8 6 I I I I Saturday Midday Peak-2006 No-Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 fTraffic Engineering Solutions I SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION I CAPACITY ANALYSES 2006 BUILD CONDITIONS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops ``9/16/2004 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 E Grade (%) 0% 0% 2% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 [ Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector Ift) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow (prat) 1711 1892 0 1770 1892 0 0 1649 1777 0 1795 1599 Flt Permitted: 0.411 0.125 0.706 0.680 Satd. Flow(perm) 740 1892 0 233 1892 0 0 1215 1777 0 1279 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 17 124 81 Link Speed (mph) .40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 482 2196 2428 Travel Time(s) 33.3 8.2 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 49 571 74 83 575 74 70 10 97 80 3 68 Lane Group Flow(vph) 52 686 0 86 669 0 0 103 124 0 99 81 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split:(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 35.1 35.1 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0:61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.72 0.32 0.57 0.31 0.22 0.29 0.16 Control Delay 11.9 19.9 4.2 8.1 23.5 5.4 22.9 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.9 19.9 4:2 8.1 23.5 5.4 22.9 6.3 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 19.3 7.6 13.6 15.4 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 224 4 143 35 0 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 #378 m5 ml84 64 25 66 25 Internal Littk Dist(ft) 1872 402 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 372 956 321 1169 330 573 347 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spitlback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.72 0.27 0.57 0.31 0.22 0.29 0.16 lift Area Type Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length:70 Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Friday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 9/16/2004 Maximum We Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay:'13.6 - intersection LOS, B Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Pe.rod {nitn) 15 _ - # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maxifnum after two cycles.; m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3.Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops m2 o3 o4 06 08 . 47 s t I Friday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Lane Configurations + Ideal Flow(vphpt) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0'- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 TraIling Detector(ft) 0 .0 0- 0 0 0 Turtling Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd.'Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 FIt Permitted 0.115 0.950 SaW-Flow(perm)' 214' -2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 35 108 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance(ft) 460 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 7.8 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 122 663 681 32 93 85 Lane Group Flow(vph) 131 713 748 35 118 108 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split(s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 33.4 33.4 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.81 0.04 0.23 0.18 Control Delay 10.6 8.7 26.4 4.5 20.7 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.6 8.7 26.4 4.5 20.7 5.4 f LOS B A G A C A Approach Delay 9.0 25.4 13A Approach LOS A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 225 279 0 39 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m22 203 #495 14 67 24 Internal Link Dist(ft) 380 4674 1928 Tum:Bay Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 286 1267 918 849 506 590 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.56 0.81 0.04 0.23 0.18 Ir�tersecttt mmai _ Area Type: Other Cycle:Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8-WBT,Start of Yellow, Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio- 0.81 L Friday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report L Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% IOU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentilerolume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ` m Volume for 95th;percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. l Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue&Ayers Road f --► �4 o6 o7 1� I l C Friday Midday Peak- 2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 ` Traffic Engineering Solutions I Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 9/16/2004 >O Lane Configurations #T l Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 16 12 12 12 Grade (%) t}$/o 0% 21% -2% Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 I Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 .50 50 50 1,5U ;50 -50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Satd. Flow(prot) 1711 1898 0 1770 1892 0 0 1649 1777 0 1799 1599 Flt Permitted 0,413 0.115 0.734 - 0.732 Satd. Flow(perm) 744 1898 0 214 1892 0 0 1263 1777 0 1377 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 10 17 125 41 Link Speed(rnph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1952 482 2196 2428 Travel Time (s) 33.3 8.2 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 43 628 66 123 523 67 69 10 99 43 4 32 Lane Group Flow(vph) 46 738 0 138 663 0 0 100 125 0 59 41 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 34.3 34.3 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 vlc Ratio 0.13 0.79 0.50 0.57 0.29 0.22 0.16 0.09 Control Delay 12.4 24.2 9.3 7.4 23.1 5.4 20.9 7.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 f Total Delay 12.4 24.2 9.3 7.4 23.1- 5.4 20.9 7.5 f LOS B C A A C A C A Approach Delay 23.5 7.7 13.3 15.4 Approach LOS C A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 260 7 139 34 - 0 _ 19 _0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 #487 m11 ml47 62 26 41 17 internal Link'gist(ft) 1872 402 .2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity(vph) 364 935 312 1169- 343 573 374 464 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced jv/c±Ratio 0.13 0.79 0.44 0.57 0.29 0.22 0.16� 0.09 ..._.. .a.... ..._ h._�i..._. .............., ._. .L........... ... .:_. ........... ._ ...a,_.S... ,is c. .,,.. s{�i Area Type: _ ._.� � Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length-70 Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 9/16/2004 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Inteisection Signal Delay: 15.3 intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 . # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. i Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops li t o2 93 o4 ®6 08 28I X-7s I Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes; Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 - - Flt Permitted 0.115 0.950 Satd..Flow(perm) 214 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 11 96 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance (ft) 460 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 7.8 81.0 45.6 Volume(vph) 154 656 665 10 139 68 Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 669 723 11 196 96 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46,0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 42.0 31.3 31.3 20.0 20.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.53 0.84 0.01 0.39 0.17 Control Delay 13.7 7.8 28.6 6.2 22.9 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.7 7.8 28.6 6.2 22.9 5.5 LOS B A C A C A Approach Delay 8.9 28.2 17.2 Approach LOS A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 160 266 0 67 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m25 m157 #469 8 92 17 I Internal Link Dist (ft) 380 4674 1928 Turn Bey Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 286 1267 861 785 506 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.53 0.84 0.01 0.39 0.17 tnt�r�ssect�on:Sumrn�ry _ Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.84 Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 612°lo ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95fh percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be forager: Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue&Ayers Road ---► 04 i;&s i 06 { o7 08 11111111 349 I I i I I Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report f Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 9/16/2004 Ti, FAR W> L '1�T 1ttlR NDl h1lT._ SR. . . .., Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 13 12 12 13 12 12 10 15 12 12 12 Grade (°lo) 00/0 0% 2°!u Storage Length (ft) 200 0 280 0 0 110 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) -5fl 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 .9 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1902 0 1770 1888 0 0 1656 1777 0 1800 1599 Flt Permitted 0.462 0.197 0.764 0.733 Satd. Flow(perm) 832 1902 0 367 1888 0 0 1315 1777 0 1379 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 8 19 120 56 Link Speed(mph) 40 40 30 30 `- Link Distance (ft) 1952 482 2196 2428 f Travel Time(s) 33.3 8.2 49.9 55.2 Volume (vph) 46 508 45 72 445 65 55 15 97 54 5 50 Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 594 0 77 542 0 0 87 120 0 66 56 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Total Split(s) 34.9 34.9 0.0 12.1 47.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Act Effct Green (s) 36.9 36.9 43.0 43.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.61 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.59 0.23 0.46 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.12 Control Delay 11.1 15.6 3.2 7.3 22.2 5.5 21.1 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 15.6 3.2 7.3 22.2 5.5 21.1 6.9 LOS B B A A C A C A Approach Delay 15.2 6.8 12.5 14.6 Approach LOS B A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 182 5 159 29 0 22 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 295 m7 139 57 27 51 24 Internal Link`Dist(ft) 1872 402 2116 2348 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 280 110 60 Base Capacity (vph) 439 1006 388 1167 357 570 374 475 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vie Ratio 0.11 0.59 0.20 0.46 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.12 #tt �1t z ------------ Area Type. Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length:70' [ Offset: 36 (51%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Yellow r Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated L Saturday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza w/Two Lanes Leaving the Site Pagel ITraffic Engineering Solutions 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Sullivan Avenue & Colony Shops 9/16/2004 IMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period m n) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 3: Sullivan Avenue &Colony Shops o2 s4 zu-. " 7 121 s 34 9a. s:- s I I I I I l I I I Saturday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza w/Two Lanes Leaving the Site Page 2 Traffic Engineering Solutions I Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Laee Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 13 15 12 16 Storage Length (ft) 290 280 130 130 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time(s) .4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Satd Flow(prot) 1770 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Fit Permitted 0.240 0.950 Satd:Flow(perm) 447 2111 1925 1742 1770 1794 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 13 137 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 Link Distance;(ft) 460 4754 2008 Travel Time (s) 7.8 81.0 45.6 Volume (vph) 112 573 492 12 115 111 Lane Group Flow(vph) 130 666 541 13 142 137 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Total Split (s) 11.1 46.0 34.9 34.9 24.0 24.0 I Act Effct Green(s) 42.0 42.0 33.2 33.2 20.0 20.0 I Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0-33 0.53 0.59 0.02 0.28 0.22 Control Delay 6.1 9.8 17.8 6.1 21.3 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.1 9.8 17.8 6.1 21.3 5.0 LOS A A B A C A Approach Delay 9.2 17.5 13.3 Approach LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 214 173 0 47 0 I Queue Length 95th (ft) m22 195 272 9 80 28 Internal Link Dist (ft) 380 4874 1928 Turn Bay.Length(ft) 290 280 130 130 Base Capacity(vph) 402 1267 914 834 506 610 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reducin 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.53 0.59 0.02 0.28 0.22 l�er�on urrirnary = = Area Type: Other Cycle Length:70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Saturday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza w/Two Lanes Leaving the Site Page 3 Traffic Engineering Solutions Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Sullivan Avenue & Ayers Road 9/16/2004 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 rn Volume far 95tfi percentile queue is metered by upstrearn signal. Splits and Phases: 6: Sullivan Avenue &Ayers Road o4 4s e6 o? 08 24 11.1 s 3 .9s`. �I I Saturday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza w/Two Lanes Leaving the Site Page 4 Traffic Engineering Solutions i UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES 2006 BUILD CONDITIONS HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive 9/16/2004 Lane Configurations Sign Cantral' Free Free Stop Grade 4% -4% -6% Volumme (veh/h) -55 693 675 67 70 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate(vph) 65 753 734 79 82 67 { Pedestrians { Lane Width (0) Walking Speed (ftls) f Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 482 460 pX, platoon unblocked 0.64 0.77 0.64 vC, conflicting volume 813 1656 773 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 705 1316 643 I tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 89 31 78 cM capacity(veh/h) 668 120 301 ya En, Volume Total 65 753 813 82 67 Volume Left 65 0 0 82 0 Volume Right q 0 _ 79 0 67 cSH 568 1700 1700 120 301 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.44 0.48 0.69 0.22 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 92 21 Control Delay(s) 12.2 0.0 0.0 84.3 20.3 Lane LOS B F C Approach Delay(s) 1.0 .0.0 55.6 Approach LOS F Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Friday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive 9/16/2004 . _ Sif . i Lane Configurations Sign Contro# Free Free Stop Grade 4% -4% -6% Volume(vehlh) 36 734 676 54 56 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 42 798 735 64 66 44 Pedestrians Lane VIlidth (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream.signal (ft) _ 482 460 pX, platoon unblocked 0.64 0.80 0.64 VC,conflicting volume 798 1649 767 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 684 1190 635 tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 93 58 86 cM capacity(veh/h) C{5�81 �s1�55 306 Volume Total 42 798 798 66 44 Volume Left 42 0 0 66 0 Volume Right 0 ,0 64 0 44 cSH 581 1700 1700 155 306 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.47 0.47 0.42 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 47 12 Control Delay(s) 11.7 0.0 0.0 44.3 18.7 Lane LOS B E C Approach Delay(s) - 0.6 0.0 34.1 Approach LOS D Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 i Friday Afternoon Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza Page 1 Traffic Engineering Solutions HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive 9/16/2004 Lane Configurations I Sign Control Free Free Stop _ Grade 4% -4% -6% Volume(vefilh) = 41 618 - 544 61 58 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 672 _591 72 68 45 Pedestrians Lane Vk/rdth (ft} Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 482 460 pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.89 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 663 1395 627 vCt, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 557 1083 521 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 94 66 90 cM capacity(veh/h) 782 200 .433 Volume Total 48 672 663 68 45 Volume Left 48 0 0 68 0 Volume Right _ 0 0 72 0 45 cSH 782 1700 1700 200 433 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.40 0.39 0.34 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 36 9 Control Delay (s) 9.9 0..0 0.0 32.0 14.3 Lane LOS A D B Approach[delay(s) 0.7 0.0 25.0 Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Saturday Midday Peak-2006 Build Conditions Synchro 6 Light Report Leonard/Moriarty Mixed Use Plaza wl Two Lanes Leaving the Site Pagel Traffic Engineering Solutions '0*N Sfq 70� O-P S_a� ?d&U&Ot 6 r. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR-CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 Date: October 8, 2004 To: Design Professionals ___ 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 From: Jeffrey H. Folger Zoning/Wetland Officer Town of South Windsor Re: Appl. #04-60P Review of the Scott Leonard site plan, Sullivan Avenue dated 09/29/04. I have reviewed the site plans for the proposed Leonard site plan with the following comments: 1. Catch basins should be hooded to help retain hydrocarbons and other automotive fluids generated from parked cars. 3. A planting plan for the detention basin should be submitted. The plan should include a topsoil specification that includes 12 inches of topsoil amended with leaf compost 30%by volume. cc. Town Engineer Town Planner IWA/CC Kelli Koehler Re Appl RI 60P Leonard Site Plan Pa e 1 From: Bob Deptula To: Kelli Koehler Date: 10/12/04 9:27AM Subject: Re:Appl 04-60P, Leonard Site Plan no comments >>> Kelli Koehler 10/12/04 09:25AM >>> Please respond with comments. Thanks Kelli Koehler Administriative Secretary 04 02: 28p Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 p. l DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape arct itclds October 19,2004 Joy L.O'Connor,Zoning Enforcement Officer Town of South Windsor `�I� '. TuiTq�v7 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut ' i,-V n : A� WK 6- RE: Property of Scott Leonard Site Plan 1000& 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut DPI Project No. 1585 Dear Ms.O'Connor, This letter is in response to your letter dated June 11,2004 adcllressed to our client,Mr.Scott Leonard. Our client mistakenly removed two of three specimen trees(a 24" maple and a 36"maple)that were to remain as part of the December 16,2002 Planning and Zoning Side Plan approval for the property at 1000 & 1006 Sullivan Avenue. To rectify this violation,replacerne:at cf the removed trees,in kind and in place,was requested by the Town Planning Department. It is die intent of our client to address this issue to the satisfaction of the Town;thus,the replacement of the specimen trees was a primary consideration in the development of the Landscape Plan,recently submitted to The Planning Department as part of a Site Plan application. To address this issue accordingly,two 8-inch caliper Sugar Mapl,-,s(the largest size tree that could reasonably be found on the market)are proposed along the street frontage;to maintain a balanced spacing between the trees along the frontage,only two trees We l:Toposed. Two 4-inch caliper Red Sunset Maples are proposed in the landscape islands in the front parking lot to complement the 8" maples. The larger trees are proposed in the general vicinity of the trees removed. Additional landscape features, including numerous shrub plantings,a stonewall,and a two-rail fence are proposed along the site frontage. The landscape features and large trees will provids:.an aesthetically pleasing view from Sullivan Avenue that hopefully achieves a character and qual:;ty that compensates for the trees that were lost. Finally,no further construction activities will be conducted on the site without prior meeting with the Town. Kindly apprise us if this plan is satisfactory. Please call if you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, 4pr Schu r neer cc: Marcia Banach Scott Leonard George Lee Peter Alter,Esq. 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.Qom DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects October 19,2004 Joy L. O'Connor,Zoning Enforcement Officer R E C I i V 'L-1- Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue O C T 2 1 2004 South Windsor,Connecticut SOUTH H VVIiVDSO R PI.Aid."AG DEPT, RE: Property of Scott Leonard Site Plan 1000& 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No.,1585 Dear Ms.O'Connor, This letter is in response to your letter dated June 11,2004 addressed to our client,Mr. Scott Leonard. Our client mistakenly removed two of three specimen trees(a 24"maple and a 36"maple)that were to remain as part of the December 16,2002 Planning and Zoning Site Plan approval for the property at 1000 & 1006 Sullivan Avenue. To rectify this violation,replacement of the removed trees,in kind and in place,was requested by the Town Planning Department. It is the intent of our client to address this issue to the satisfaction of the Town;thus,the replacement of the specimen trees was a primary consideration in the development of the Landscape Plan,recently submitted to the Planning Department as part of a Site Plan application. To address this issue accordingly,two 8-inch caliper Sugar Maples(the largest size tree that could reasonably be found on the market)are proposed along the street frontage;to maintain a balanced spacing between the trees along the frontage,only two trees are proposed. Two 4-inch caliper Red Sunset Maples are proposed in the landscape islands in the front parking lot to complement the 8" maples. The larger trees are proposed in the general vicinity of the trees removed. Additional landscape features,including numerous shrub plantings,a stonewall,and a two-rail fence are proposed along the site frontage. The landscape features and large trees will provide an aesthetically pleasing view from Sullivan Avenue that hopefully achieves a character and quality that compensates for the trees that were lost. Finally,no further construction activities will be conducted on the site without prior meeting with the Town. Kindly apprise us if this plan is satisfactory. Please call if you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Judy Schu r Pr ' ct neer cc: Marcia Banach Scott Leonard George Lee Peter Alter,Esq. 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com Kelli Koehler- RE:A 104-60P Leonard Site Plan a e � From: "William Lanning"<WLanning@southwindsorfire.org> To: "Kelli Koehler"<koehle@southwindsor.org> Date: 10/27/04 7:46AM Subject: RE: Appl 04-60P, Leonard Site Plan -----Original Message----- From: Kelli Koehler[mailto:koehle@southwindsor.org] Sent:Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:25 AM To: Bob Deptula;Jeff Doolittle; Chris Dougan; Ray Favreau; Matt Galligan; Mike Gantick; Kristian Lindstrom; Cathy Molloy; Sgt. Rich Bond; Karl Reichle; Fred Shaw; Dennis Sheridan; Melvin Stead; William Lanning Subject:Appl 04-60P, Leonard Site Plan Please respond with comments. Thanks Kelli Koehler Administriative Secretary No Comment on this application. Wm. R. Lanning I DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors landscape architects ♦ gis ♦ gps October 27, 2004 Ms. Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave ou South Windsor, CT 06074 J04 RE: Leonard Property Proj.No. 1585 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Ms. Banach, Per the instruction of Michele Lipe, I am writing to inform you Design Professionals, Inc. has notified all of"The Neighborhood" property owners behind Scott Leonard's property on Sullivan Avenue via Certificate of Mail. Should it be necessary, we have proof of this mailing in our files. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS INC. BY 6 41 4 21-0� aY'uA-LQ- Andrea Momnie, Executive Coordinator cc: Judy Schuler 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax: (860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, Town Engineer , Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer DATE: October 28, 2004 RE: 1000/1006 Sullivan Ave. — Property Of Scott Leonard P&Z Appl. No. 04-60P At your request, we have reviewed the plans and reports submitted with this application and offer the following comments: 1. The site plan shows a future access easement to be provided in favor of the property to the west owned by Ronald Martin. Show how this access drive will be achieved given the change in grade between the two sites. Modify the proposed site plan as necessary. 2. The proposed site access drive for this Mixed Use Plaza is located at the existing curb cut which provides access to the Moriarty property. While this would appear to be the best location for the access drive in relation to the nearest signalized intersections, the traffic engineer's report indicates that the site access drive approach to Sullivan Avenue will operate at LOS F or D for typical Friday peak hours. With this configuration, it would be very difficult to access Sullivan Avenue heading East from the access drive (left turn). The applicant's traffic engineer should be prepared to address this concern, as well as provide information regarding using an alternate route of access to the site via the shopping center to the west. 3. Sightline distances from the access drive looking east and west should be shown on the site plan. 4. Additional traffic signage should be placed in the area between parking stalls numbered 12 and 13 (as designated on the site plan) indicating "one way — do not enter". These signs should be placed on both sides of the drive to prevent through traffic. 5. The layout for the site shows 9' by 18' parking spaces vs. the 10' by 20' dimensions normally required. Given the proposed use for the site which includes a bank and a fast food restaurant which generate more rapid, '"in-out" traffic movements, it may be more difficult to maneuver in and out of these smaller parking spaces. 6. A top of frame elevation should be provided for the proposed grease trap located in front of the bank. 7. The site plan shows proposed sewer laterals from the buildings connecting to an existing sanitary sewer line which runs along the west side of the site. The applicant must seek permission to connect to this line as it is a private sewer. 8. The landscape plan indicates that the detention basin will be established as lawn area although the slopes of the embankment are at a 2.5 :1 slope. The applicant should consider alternate landscaping for this area as mowing would be difficult given the steepness of the embankments. 9. Deep test pit logs indicate good soil conditions for possible subsurface drainage. The applicants engineer should consider the use of on-site subsurface infiltration for the primary stormwater treatment with an overflow to the stormwater system in Sullivan Ave. 10.How will the area between the parking lot and the wall in front of it be graded? 11. Revise top of frame and invert elevations on the detail for the detention basin outlet structure (sheet 8 of 8) to match elevations shown on the site plan (100-year flood elevation = 124.87). 12. The standard detail sheet for the BaySaver unit should be revised to show dimensions and elevations. Please let us know if you have any questions. =Kelli Koehler- RE,04-63P, G & R Marine Site Plan Pa e 1 From: "William Lanning"<WLanning@southwindsorfire.org> To: "Kelli Koehler"<koehle@southwindsor.org> Date: 11/3/04 4:05PM Subject: RE: 04-63P, G & R Marine Site Plan -----Original Message----- From: Kelli Koehler[mailto:koehle@southwindsor.org] Sent:Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:10 PM To: Bob Deptula;Jeff Doolittle; Chris Dougan; Ray Favreau; Matt Galligan; Mike Gantick; Kristian Lindstrom; Cathy Molloy; Sgt. Rich Bond; Karl Reichle; Fred Shaw; Dennis Sheridan; Melvin Stead;William Lanning Subject: 04-63P, G & R Marine Site Plan Please respond with any comments. Thanks Kelli Koehler Administriative Secretary No Comment on this application.Wm. R. Lanning Nov 12 04 08: 44a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 p, 2 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surneyors gis ♦gps ♦ landscape architects MEMORANDUM To: Ms.Marcia Banach,Director of Planning From: Galen B.Semprebon,P.E. Judy A.Schuler,Project Engineer Date: November 10,2004 Re: Scott Leonard Site Plan 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut Project No.: 1585 The following are like-numbered responses to comments in a Memontndtun addressed to you from Jeffrey Doolittle and Joseph Perna dated October 28,2004 regarding the above-reference project. 1. Design for a site access drive through the property of the abi.tter to the west(Ronald Martin)is shown on the attached conceptual plan_ Topography,edge of pavemer t,a:td building location on the Martin property were taken from Town Topography Mapping. The future acces.,;easement in favor of N/F Ronald Martin was revised accordingly. 2. The owner of the property to the west refused access through hi_<Jher property(see attached letter); consequently,this is not a viable option. However,a shared access drive was agreed to by the abutter to the east and is proposed as part of this site plan(an approval for the site plan with this shared drive was granted by the PZC on December 10,2002). A traffic analysis was dow.by our Traffic Consultant,Mr.Bruce Hillson,regarding the front entrance drive and the plan was revised/designed per his recommendations to address concerns regarding LOS. Mr.Hillson will be present at:the PZC hearing on November 16,2004;he will be prepared to address this issue. 3. Sightline distances were added to the plan. The sightline distances are also noted in the Traffic Impact Study submitted with the application(see page l I of Traffic Iml)act Study dated September 2004 prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions). 4. The following signs were added to the plans to prevent traffic from going north through the bank drive-thru lanes: Two each"DO NOT ENTER"signs past the end of the batik drive-thru lanes. Pavement markings of "DO NOT ENTER"and"ONE WAY"are also shown on the plan in this general area. "NO RIGHT TURN"sign at the southwest corner of the bamk building Other measures to improve the internal circulation on the sit,;ar,-as follows. These measures are the result of a meeting held with Town Staff on November 1,2004 and discussions/recommendations made by our Traffic Consultant. These measures include: - `BY-PASS LANE"sign in.rear parking lot - "BY-PASS LANE"pavement marking at start of one-way:regular tratlic lane in rear parking lot - "DRIVE-THRU LANE"sign in rear parking lot - "DRIVE-THRU"pavement marking at start of one-way bank traffic lane in rear parking lot - "ONE WAY"pavement marking at start of one-way travel lanes in rear parking lot - Solid line pavement marking to separate the By-Pass Lane from the Bank Drive-Thru Lane - Striped transition pavement marking to direct drivers to By-Pass Lane or Drive-Thru Lane and indicated one way travel - Directional arrow pavement markings before and after tine-way travel lanes in rear parking lot 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Gcrnnecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Nov 12 04 08: 44a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 P, 3 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape arckitects — 60 degree angled parking spaces in rear parking lot(facilitates in-out parking movements and reminds individuals of one-way travel lanes).One parking space•ova;;eliminated as a result of this change; however,the total number of parking spaces still conforms 11)zoning. 5. 9'x 18'parking spaces were part of original approval by:the PZC for the Dunkin Donuts/Retail Building on January 15, 1998 and re-approved on December 10,2002. To facilitate customer parking movements,instead of larger spaces a double stripe between-.he.parking spaces is proposed. This parking space configuration(9'x 18'parking space with a double stripe between spaces)was installed at the South Windsor Town Center Shopping Center parking lot and the parking lots at Evergreen Walk where similar traffic movements may be expected. 6. Top of frame elevation added to plan. 7. Our client's attorney,Mr.Peter Alter,is researching the terms and conditions associated with the existing sanitary sewer line and sanitary sewer easement running along;the west side of the site. If a sanitary sewer connection to this line is not possible,a connection to the sem er rnain on Sullivan Avenue would be proposed. Timothy Moriarty,the abutter to the East,has also sta::ed that he would allow any utility easements/connections through his property to serve the build ing ;proposed on the property of our client. 8. The Type li seeding mix with 6"of topsoil is proposed in the Detention Basin(as approved by the Conservation Commission at their meeting on November 3,2 304). This mix produces ground cover that may be mowed,but mowing is not required. 9. The plans were revised(based on a similar comment received from Mr.Jeff Folger in his letter dated October 28,2004)to take advantage of the well-draining soils on site. Installation of perforated pipe between the roof leaders and the proposed catch basins is proposed. Based on our analysis,using previously computed permeability rates,we have found that the perforated pipe will provide 100% infiltration of the roof runoff;all other runoffneeds treatment(provided via the Baysaver Unit and Detention Basin). The Conservation Commission approved the plan,with these revisions,on November 3, 2004. 10. The area between the parking lot and the wall in front of it will bi::graded away from the curb-line. 11. Elevation revised. 12. Upon approval,the plan will be sent to BaySaver,Inc.for a fill design that will be provided to the Town accordingly. Estimated elevations and inverts are depicted on the plan. Also,please note the following: 1. Additional landscape plantings between the front entrance anc thi::detention basin are included in the revised plan as requested by your office. 2. Architectural Design Review approved the site plan at their m-:eting on November 4,2004. 3. The plans were revised to note that trap hoods shall be installed ici all proposed catch basins(see note 9 on revised plans)per Mr.Folgers comments in his letter dated October 8,2004. Please contact us if you need anything further. Attachment 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860).291-8757 Nov 12 04 08: 44a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 p. 4 • i Ili li j I — F o - CONC. PAD II ♦ b 51LF � 1; II ® S=1.477.1DOO SULLIVAN AM PFOPOSED BANI• II y�P s 2.955 SF s ` I FF:131.40 NIF BY—PA,SS ,!I � RONALD M T/ LANE ROOF OVERHANG 3,0 CANOPY _ \ a 2 -58.0 ,So9� L0 IN','127.40 0 15.7 LF 6' PVC SDR 3�\ O S�124X PRI)PO D 1P-6 �,� PROP. GR II DO NO INV. 1N: .5 ENTER GN INV. T 126 DETAIL) pS,l ONE WAY LF 6` PVC 5 TF: 8• DO NOT ENTER N o S 2.5X --- I V IN: 4. 5(6') FU TURE A COE S INY Tit .95 (8') 32 L F 6' VC SDR 35 S+2.OX IN y 125.46�29 PROPOSED ^, A SEMEN T N !vNO „ FA V OR Of N �' �\�� TURN SIGN 24 94.7'— — — — f�7►r vP P� ONALD MAR o!� ,�rL9 P 0 OSE PCB P D M D 17 TF:1 .75 SFO R INV.-1 .25 1 I 12 15' r?s lP1 III PROP. T INI G ALL ,�h O :1 .00 II ` ETALI,) 7� FEHGMPQS 128 TOf OF EMBANKMENT PROPOS D TW RAIL \ ELE 126.00 Tpj N FENCE ( EE DE AIL) 1Z IN, 12t C> � IX .76"MAPLE BYIST. \ PAST AT— TF:1271.25 ;� �� Q INV:117.85 6 i i O F i;:CP 15" RCP D I S=2.867 _ ® 5=22.3% EX aMH. SW7767s :Y/ST. T.F�f79.62 ' — — �X/SIING EA �OF2A c!/NV.=115.86 1 6WS714'QVCRE E WALK _ 24'RCP w� i 7F.•119.J7__ 1 PROP T.F.-119.80 IN 11.7.9 - __-�X/S77NC DOUBLE YELLOW LWE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ laudwape architects MEMORANDUM To: Ms.Marcia Banach,Director of Planning From: Wen B. Se tnprebon,P.E. NOV 12 2004 Judy A. Scer,Project En SOUTi Date: November 12,2004 !`il`ii7;iO P_%ti?r!i!C tJ r'"i Re: Scott Leonard Site Plan 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut Project No.: 1585 The following are like-numbered responses to comments in a MemorWduxn addressed to you from Jeffrey Doolittle and Joseph Perna dated October 28,2004 regarding the above-reference->Xoject.,fright sets of revised plans are attached for you review. 1. Design for a site access drive through the property of the abutter to the weft(Ronald Martin)is shown on the attached conceptual plan. Topography,edge of pavement,and building location on the Martin property were taken*om Town Topography Mapping. The future,access emedt"in favor of N/F Ronald Martin was revised accordingly. 2. The owner of the property to the west refused access through his/her property(see attached letter); consequently,this is not a viable option. However,a shared access drive was agreed to by the abutter to the east and is proposed as part of this site plan(an approval for the site plan with this shared drive was granted by the PZC on December 10,2002). A traffic analysis was done by our Traffic Consultant,Mr. Bruce Hillson,regarding the front entrance drive and the plan was revised/designed per his recommendations to address concerns regarding LOS. Mr.Hillson will be present at the PZC hearing on November 16,2004;he will be prepared to address this issue. 3. Sightline distances were added to the plan. The sightline distances are also noted in the Traffic Impact Study submitted with the application(see page 11 of Traffic Impact Study dated September 2004 prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions). 4. The following signs were added to the plans to prevent traffic from going north through the bank drive- thru lanes: — Two each"DO NOT ENTER'signs past the end of the bank drive-thru lanes. Pavement markings of "DO NOT ENTER"and"ONE WAY'are also shown on the plan in this general area. — "NO RIGHT TURN"sign at the southwest corner of the bank building Other measures to improve the internal circulation on the site are as follows. These measures are the result of a meeting held with Town Staff on November 1,2004 and discussions/recommendations made by our Traffic Consultant. These measures include: — `BY-PASS LANE'sign in rear parking lot — `BY-PASS LANE"pavement marking at start of one-way regular traffic lane in rear parking lot — "DRIVE-THRU LANE'sign in rear parking lot — "DRIVE-THRU'pavement marking at start of one-way bank traffic lane in rear parking lot — "ONE WAY'pavement marking at start of one-way travel lanes in rear parking lot — Solid line pavement marking to separate the By-Pass Lane from the Bank Drive-Thm Lane — Striped transition pavement marking to direct drivers to By-Pass Lane or Drive-Thru Lane and indicated one way travel 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 9 Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects Directional arrow pavement markings before and after one-way travel lanes in rear parking lot 60 degree angled parking spaces in rear parking lot(facilitates in-out parking movements and reminds individuals of one-way travel lanes).One parking space was eliminated as a result of this change;however,the total number of parking spaces still conforms to zoning. 5. 9'x 18'parking spaces were part of the original approval by the PZC for the Dunkin Donuts/Retail Building on January 15, 1998 and re-approved on December 10,2002. To facilitate customer parking movements,instead of larger spaces a double stripe between the parking spaces is proposed. This parking space configuration(9' x 18'parking space with a double stripe between spaces)was installed at the South Windsor Town Center Shopping Center parking lot and the parking lots at Evergreen Walk where similar traffic movements may be expected. 6. Top of frame elevation added to plan. 7. Our client's attorney,Mr.Peter Alter,is researching the terms and conditions associated with the existing sanitary sewer line and sanitary sewer easement running along the west side of the site. If a sanitary sewer connection to this line is not possible,a connection to the sewer main on Sullivan Avenue would be proposed. Timothy Moriarty,the abutter to the East,has also stated that he would allow any utility easements/connections through his property to serve the buildings proposed on the property of our client. 8. The Type II seeding mix with 6"of topsoil is proposed in the Detention Basin(as approved by the Conservation Commission at their meeting on November 3,2004). This mix produces ground cover that may be mowed,but mowing is not required. 9. The plans were revised(based on a similar comment received from Mr. Jeff Folger in his letter dated October 28,2004)to take advantage of the well-draining soils on site. Installation of perforated pipe between the roof leaders and the proposed catch basins is proposed. Based on our analysis,using previously computed permeability rates,we have found that the perforated pipe will provide 100% infiltration of the roof runoff;all other runoff needs treatment(provided via the Baysaver Unit and Detention Basin). The Conservation Commission approved the plan,with these revisions,on November 3,2004. 10. The area between the parking lot and the wall in front of it will be graded away from the curb-line. 11. Elevation revised. 12. Upon approval,the plan will be sent to BaySaver,Inc.for a full design that will be provided to the Town accordingly. Estimated elevations and inverts are depicted on the plan. Also,please note the following: 1. Additional landscape plantings between the front entrance and the detention basin are included in the revised plan as requested by your office. 2. Architectural Design Review approved the site plan at their meeting on November 4, 2004. 3. The plans were revised to note that trap hoods shall be installed in all proposed catch basins(see note 9 on revised plans)per Mr.Folgers comments in his letter dated October 8,2004. Please contact us if you need anything further. Attachments 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 1 \ 1 t 11 i� i i I (A5.5cx3, \ PROP. \ I F a — _ �O CONC. PAD DING ' 51 LF ' ® S=1.47% 1000 SULLIVAN AM � ��� ,�1 PROPOSED B s j BANK _ 2,955 SF �I FF:131.40 i N/F t BY-PASS RONALD M �/ x ` LANE ►_ 1 " ROOF OVERHANG 3.0 'gyp N / CANOPY y� �p94' r INV:127.40 \ 2 8.0 1 5-124R PVC SDR 3 - 1�p CJr> PROP. GR PR PO ED TP-6 M� INV. IN: 5 EN ER INV. T.126 EN ER IGN DETAIL) Psm ONE WAY LF 6" PVC 5 TF: 9. DO NOT ENTER O S-2.5% — 1 V IN: FU TURE A CCE S INV T.'11 .95 (8") 82 LF VC SDR 35 S-2.0% IN —125.46'29 / q PROPOSED-'NO II EA SE/YI E/V T N ` \�� TURNI SIIGN' � 24 94.7' - - - FA VOR OF N F ' _ F c4Gp� ONALD MAR 1Z0 PCB P 0 OSE 17 TF:1 .75 1 P D MO D INV.' .25 12 SFO R 15" LP1 PE 1 1 PROP. T INI G ALL O :1 .00 TOP 12 .00 c-:;:_ ETA{ ) ENST ,z FovcEl\pos 125 TO OF EMBANKMENT PROPOS D TW RAIL E 126.00 N N FENCE ( EE DE AIL) 125 TP�1 \ j �� a 724 C> EX1ST. X/ST. L� EX 36 MAPLE EEN�CE\PGLST TF.121.25 0�� 11 _ C INV-117.85 1 RCP F 15" RCP D S-2.86% _ ® S=22.3% 7s17 EX. S.M.H. SNE7187s \ T.F=119.62 XIST. INV=115.88 EMs 4'CgyCRE7E WALK _£X/SI/NG�IJGF�7F 1�4 NG-WI//7FffA7F— — EX ccs — �_ IF•119-3f — Y S£ 719D.—f8"rl1Pf-715.Tf— . __ xr nNG EX. S.M.H. PROP INV 15 IN:115.35 T.F.=119.80 /NV.=111.79 EX/SONG 90UM E YELLOW LINE St� i � MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer DATE: November 16, 2004 RE: 1000/1006 Sullivan Ave. — Property Of Scott Leonard P&Z Appl. No. 04-60P We have reviewed the revised plans and cover letter submitted by Design Professionals and offer the following comments: 1. The concept sketch submitted by Design Professionals depicts a site access drive connecting the Leonard site to the Martin property. This design does not appear to be realistic if the intent is to provide a through drive; due to the geometry and steepslope. In order to create n p a access drive that would be functional and safe it appears that the applicants site would have to be lowered in grade and the parking lot on the Martin property re-graded. 2. The Applicant's Traffic Engineer should address the site access drive approach to Sullivan Avenue, in particular, queue lengths on the site drive. 3. A painted cross-walk should be provided across the access drive to the site, at the sidewalk crossing. 4. The engineer needs to provide more information on the treatment of roof runoff utilizing underground infiltration. 5. The proposed maple trees at the front of the detention basin should be relocated as they will have an adverse impact to the detention basins as they mature. In particular, the proposed tree on the west side should be moved further away from the outlet structure. 6 R-P.Martin 46 Wood Pond Rd. West Hartford,Cr 06107 US.A. l L� DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects November 12, 2004 Transmitted via FEDEX (For November 13, 2004 Delivery) Ronald Martin 46 Woodpond Road West Hartford, Connecticut 06107 RE: Access Easement 950 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 1585 Dear Mr. Martin: In December 2002, we received a certified letter(see attached) stating, on advice of legal counsel, your denial of access through your property from the adjoining property of Scott Leonard at 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue. We assume that your December, 2002 letter remains in effect; however, due to our recent application for a site plan modification for the property at 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue, we have been asked by the Town of South Windsor Planning Department to contact you for a letter of confirmation. We request you provide a letter of confirmation or current letter restating your position in this matter. For your information, the site plan application is to construct a bank and retail/office building at 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue instead of a Dunkin Donuts/retail building. The Town Planning& Zoning Commission will hear the application on Tuesday,November 16, 2004; consequently, your efforts to provide us with a letter by November 16, 2004 (including via fax or e-mail), which can be presented at the Planning&Zoning meeting, would be greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Judy Schuler at this office. Sincerely, DESIGN P1,J.PFESSIONALS, INC. ll,�l By: ; Peter It. DeXfbie, Principal Enclosure cc: Scott Leonard George Lee Peter J. Alter, Esq. Judy A. Schuler 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax: (860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com N-v 11 04 09: 39a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 P. 1 w DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers•planners•sulve}ors gis•gps-landscape an lurecr:c FACSIMILE.. TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: r•Ro - ' CObIPANY: DATE: FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: PHONENUMBE•R: SENDER'S RE'ERIiNCL•NUMBER: RL: YOUR REFEW:NCz-NUM ER: ❑URGENT XFOR REVIEW XPLEASE COMMENT )RPL1;AST REPLY ❑PLEASE RECY(-LF NOTES/COMMENTS: 4V G � jO r 165 SOUTH SATELLITE ROAD SOUTH 1-VIP;DSOR, CT 06074 $60 291-8755 & FAX 860 2)1-11757 Nov 11 04 09: 39a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 P. 2 DESIGN PROFESSIONM.,S, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦gps♦ landscape architect:; MEMORANDUM To: Ms.Marcia Banach,Director of Planning From: Galen B.Scmprebon,P.E. Judy A.Schuler,Project Engineer Date: November 10,2004 Re: Scott Leonard Site Plan 1000-t006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut Project No.: 1585 The following are like-numbered responses to comments in a Memorarudum addressed to you from Jeffrey Doolittle and Joseph Perna dated October 28,2004 regarding the above-reference project. I. Design for a site access drive through the property of the abutter to the west(Ronald Martin)is shown on the attached conceptual plan. Topography,edge of pavement,and building location on the Martin property were taken from Town Topography Mapping. The future access easement in favor of N/F Ronald Martin was revised accordingly. 2. The owner of the property to the west refused access through hisiher property(see attached letter); consequently,this is not a viable option. However,a shared access drive was agreed to by the abutter to the east and is proposed as part of this site plan(an approval for 1 he rite plan with this shared drive was granted by the PZC on December 10,2002). A traffic analysis was d ane by our Traffic Consultant,Mr.Bruce Hillson,regarding the front entrance drive and the plan was r�vi:sed/designed per his recommendations to address concerns regarding LOS. Mr.Hillson will be present at 1:he PZC hearing on November 16,2004;he will be prepared to address this issue. 3. Sightline distances were added to the plan. The sightline disc antes are also noted in the Traffic Impact Study submitted with the application(see page 1 I of Traffic Impact Study dated September 2004 prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions). 4. The following signs were added to the plans to prevent traffic::from going north through the bank drive-thru lanes: - Two each"DO NOT ENTER"signs past the end of the':)an'(:drive-thru lanes. Pavement markings of "DO NOT ENTER"and"ONE WAY"are also shown c n the plan in this general area. "NO RIGHT TURN"sign at the southwest corner of the bank building Other measures to improve the internal circulation on the site:an.as follows. These measures are the result of a meeting held with Town Staff on November 1,2004 and&,cussions/recommendations made by our Traffic Consultant. These measures include: - `BY-PASS LANE"sign in rear parking lot - `BY-PASS LANE"pavement marking at start of one-w iy regular traffic lane in rear parking lot - "DRIVE-THRU LANE"sign in rear parking lot - "DRIVE-THRU"pavement marking at start of one-way bank traffic lane in rear parking lot - "ONE WAY"pavement marking at start of one-way travel lanes in rear parking lot - Solid line pavement marking to separate the By-Pass Lane liom the Bank Drive-Thru Lane - Striped transition pavement marking to direct drivers to By.-Pass Lane or Drive-Thru Lane and indicated one way travel - Directional arrow pavement markings before and after one.-way travel lanes in rear parking lot 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor-,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755 a Fax:(860)291-8757 Nov 11 04 09: 40a Design Professionals 860-291 -8757 p. 3 DESIGN PROFESSION.U.,S, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architecits — 60 degree angled parking spaces in rear parking lot(facilitates in-out parking movements and reminds individuals of one-way travel lanes).One parking space w as oliminatcd as a result of this change; however,the total number of parking spaces still conforms to,zoning. 5. 9'x 18'parking spaces were part of the original approval by ttje F'ZC for the Dunkin Donuts/Retail Building on January 15, 1998 and re-approved on December 10,2002. To facilitate customer parking movements,instead of larger spaces a double stripe between the parking spaces is proposed. This parking space configuration(9'x 18'parking space with a double stril a between spaces)was installed at the South Windsor Town Center Shopping Center parking lot and the parking lots at Evergreen Walk where similar traffic movements may be expected. 6. Top of frame elevation added to plan. 7. Our client's attorney,Mr.Peter Alter,is researching the terms and conditions associated with the existing sanitary sewer line and sanitary sewer easement running along the;west side of the site. If a sanitary sewer connection to this line is not possible,a connection to the sewer main on Sullivan Avenue would be proposed. Timothy Moriarty,the abutter to the East,has also sta1:.-d that he would allow any utility casements/connections through his property to serve the build:ng:i proposed on the property of our client. S. The Type 11 seeding mix with 6"of topsoil is proposed in the Deb:ntion Basin(as approved by the Conservation Commission at their meeting on November 3,2004'-. This mix produces ground cover that may be mowed,but mowing is not required. 9. The plans were revised(based on a similar continent received froin Mr.Jeff Folger in his letter dated October 28,2004)to take advantage of the well-draining soils on site. Installation of perforated pipe between the roof leaders and the proposed catch basins is proposed. Based on our analysis,using previously computed permeability rates,we have found that the perforated pipe will provide 100% infiltration of the roof runoff,all other runoff needs treatment(provided via the Baysaver Unit and Detention Basin). The Conservation Commission approved tLe plan,with these revisions,on November 3, 2004. 10. The area between the parking lot and the wall in front of it will be graded away from the curb-line. 11. Elevation revised. I2. Upon approval,the plan will be sent to BaySaver,Inc.for a fi11 design that will be provided to the Town accordingly. Estimated elevations and inverts are depicted on the:plan. Also,please note the following: 1. Additional landscape plantings between the front entrance and the:detention basin are included in the revised plan as requested by your office. 2. Architectural Design Review approved the site plan at their meeting on November 4,2004. 3. The plans were revised to note that trap hoods shall be installed in all proposed catch basins(see note 9 on revised plans)per Mr.Folgers comments in his letter dated Octol:er 8,2004. Please contact us if you need anything further. Attachment 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Covnecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 RECUM NOV 16 2004 Dear Timothy Wentzel SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. We the undersigned of Pinewoods are requesting a six foot stockade fence be put up on the abutting properties of Pinewoods and the new construction that will be located on Sullivan Ave. The plans of the new construction were viewed at the town hall of South Windsor and we understand that buffing is in place. It is our concern that this will not provide sufficient protection along with the amount of time it will take the buffer to grow. Due to the large volume of small children within the neighborhood,we are very concerned for there safety since they will be playing in the backyards of the abutting properties. From the looks of the plans our children along with us will have clear view of the property and all it contains along with Sullivan Ave this concerns us greatly. It is our hope you will think of the children's safety since there will be an increase of traffic visiting the property located on Sullivan Ave. We do not wish to have people see in clear view the children playing in the yards on the pinewoods property. We feel that if a six foot stockade fence is not put up that the children's safety will be put in jeopardy Thank you for your corporation and understanding 4�1_ - feloi A r. 1 l )Lail f�` Jjyq f t t .4, Appl #04-60P, Leonard Site Plan 11/16/04 Planning Department Report �perty u lv zA-ye-r-s-Revd ( e. Th rrk u nit re uran ui ' . le r-efer-�nees� , --aWication-w�ha -access-and-parkmg-are ) 2. Ma imum4mpervious-_coverage-allo is""b3'�54% . P4epased- Ee �n • minima loti al5664= grontger0�feet;-nri��l�wed i-s 1-00-feet. F own -yard-setbacTcis`'94 feet—50-feet4 iFeer 3. T4hgr�����P Y1PP11 �771`17111PC (tM.] a3V�d7Vfthi�proper-ty. This-svit-e--reeeived— v-arias-itri-9999-tovredrxee-tie-requited buf er 2.0_.feet;and-the r-equiredwfrontyud se ac rom eef to 40 feet. 'phis a iivant has not utilized the front-yard-setb-ck-varianccw th-this application. 4. This property is subject to the access management regulations. A shared access is being proposed with the property to the east (the Moriarty site). There is a lot of high-turnover traffic associated with the types of uses proposed: bank and fast food in particular. Because of that, we're at a real decision point with access management and this small stretch of Sullivan Avenue. In the past, the interconnection of this site with the adjacent Colony Shops site has been aM 4-(y r , with each previous application. Town staff, including the Director of Public Works, Town Engineer, Superintendent of Streets, South Windsor Police Services, and myself have always been unanimous in our strong recommendation to the Commission that entrance through Colony Shops is the desired entrance to this facility for a number of reasons: ♦ the proposed new driveway location is at the base of a hill leading into a curve; ♦ the base of that hill is a difficult stop/start position in slippery conditions; ♦ left turns in and out during peak hours will be extremely difficult. For example, the traffic report already shows a level of service F for vehicles trying to exit the site during a typical Friday idday. There is a traffic light at the Colony Shops entrance, which vv enable vehicles leaving this site to make safe left turns in and out during peak traffic hours. i 1 This site is a prime example of the type of sites and locations for which access management provides the largest benefits to the roadway system and the traveling public, by minimizing traffic flow disruptions, and maximizing traffic safety. We understand that the owner of the Colony Shops is not granting approval at this time. Iy that case, our obligation under access management is to ensure thatAk desired interconnection is accommodated by the site design for the subject site, and the necessary easements are in place on the subject site. Then, when the Colony Shops seek development approval in the future and then are subject to the access management provisions themselves, the interconnection would be made at that time. However, the subject site as currently designed precludes interconnection with Colofiy Shops because of grade differences. The applicant has instead chosen to raise the site and provide shared access width the abutting site to the east. Staff agree that the better access management plan is to lower the site in order to ultimately interconnect with the Colony Shops in order to gain access to the traffic signal, because the subject site includes at least two high-turnaround uses. The proposed site to the east is smaller, and has indicated to ZBA that the plan an office use, which is usually a much lower traffic generator and thus more desirable as the stand-alone driveway. We ask the Commission to give careful consideration to this issue. 5. This access is on a state road and will be subject to DOT approval. 6. T x st i&walk-_ongSull-ivan Ay4gili for y. 7. The parking requirements based on the individual uses is 49 spaces; 56 spaces have been provided. The applicant has proposed parking spaces that are 9' X 18' in size and they are proposing to add double stripes between the spaces (similar to what was done at Stop and Shop and Evergreen Walk). A fieldstone wall with a split rail fence on top in the front of the parking area is proposed to delineate the edge of the parking area. 8. There is a buffer requirement that was reduced by ZBA from 50' to 20'. Staff had a concern about the adequacy of the buffer shown on the submitted plans, but Design Professionals has indicated that the buffer will be enhanced to meet the requirements of our buffer regulations. If the abutting neighbors have a preference regarding what they would like to see in the buffer, we suggest that the applicant work out the buffer details with those neighbors. 9. Public water and sewer are available in Sullivan Avenue. WPCA approval is required; and a grease/oil separator may be required in the restaurant facility. 2 10.The Architecture Design Review Committee reviewed the overall plans on October 21 and reviewed the specific materials and colors to be used on November 4, 2004. Overall, they were pleased with the "New England" architecture and color palette proposed. 11.T Shields will be placed on the lights along the northerly property boundary to help mitigate light shining into the residential property to the north. The applicant has indicated a willingness to turn the site lights off overnight. 12.There is a detention basin shown in the front of the property along Sullivan ..� -eve. We note for the Commission that at least two other sites on Sullivan <<f' 601 Avenue placed their detention facilities underground so that there would not be V\z,f l a detention basin hole right on the street. The previouk(sitr plan ,,- V�) included underground detention. In this case, it appears that the basin would be P�J. q e ru visible as you approach the site while traveling west along Sullivan Avenue. If J(;%-I b the Commission does not want to see a detention basin in this location,Q appoawtlW underground detention is � e option. 13.We do note that the applicant cut down two large maple trees along the property S e frontage that were specifically required to be preserved with the prior approval. The removal of the large trees cleared the area where the detention basin is proposed. The underground detention approved on the previous plan did not interfere with those large trees. The applicant proposes to replace those trees that should not have been cut down with two 8" sugar maple trees planted on the edge of t e d e�te�tion basin. , b t pl����-lame des. f -ag�i�f�te � d u �rgrod;th�large relac� tes� l�t o ated �Tl�\.LV IVal{,1V1�J1111V111CLLLIJ, L11V S. 14.The--4pph:Gant-is-propesiu :-a-monu=ont-sign-in-�——t-,of the-pFeperty-t-hat--- • -off-t�--�ig�-1ias-bee�xbted-fir-tom 15.There are no regulated wetlands on site. The applicant received conservation plan approval with a $5,000 bond for erosion & sediment control and installation of the storm water structures, and no unusual approval conditions. 16.The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and has no comments at this time. 17.T4ere j o-proms-sed dumpstemat-each-en o;-she on- 1ffffdW-pads- -sereenrff. 3 h 18.If this application is approved, the planning department would request, in addition to items already noted, that the appropriate access management conditions be incorporated into the approval.i c -9,A-C,vu-i-c(f, <r n oU 0�F ne LOP I1 'Ota1(r412 4 4e4 C r, o4 k 4-f ,j' a <c 41-tve-4zi" OIL 10. r i� d �cr. � C�_ u�I a ✓ wt-�C�f � �ref� � �Y 1�V DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects RECEIVED November 24, 2004 DEC 1 m 2004 The Neighborhood Pud SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, G& W Management, Inc. P.O. Box 280928 0 y- ( O P East Hartford, Connecticut 06128 To Whom It May Concern: Re: Application of Scott Leonard DPI Project No. 1585 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut In accordance with the recent Planning&Zoning Commission approval, we are required to notify you that the application and development on the property abutting yours is subject to the Planning &Zoning Commission's condition of providing a fence at the property line in addition to a row of evergreen trees. This was requested by the concerned citizens of the neighborhood and agreed to by the applicant. As the management firm of the abutting residential property, please be advised that the landscape buffer will,include a six foot high PVC fence as requested for screening at the property line and a row of 6'white fir with some additional ornamental flowering trees placed throughout the buffer. This design has been reviewed and found to be acceptable by the Town's Director of Planning, Marcia Banach. The attached sketch reflects the solid"board-on-board" style of fencing proposed. For further information or questions of the landscape buffering proposed,please contact Richard Boston at the offices of Design Professionals, Inc. (860-291-8755). Sincerely, DESIGN PrI0 SION S, INC. Richard L. Boston, RLA Director of Landscape Architecture Attachment C: Georgia Blackwell, Board Director of Pinewoods Homeowners Association 4 Wapping Avenue,,South Windsor, CT 06074 Scott Leonard Marcia,Banach, Town of South Windsor Judy Schuler, Project Engineer 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com ersal I�he Walpole Virg l Series New Englana cap ! iz � y 1 i a Fiat ttx#5ccc rack^! r l t ------- ---,-- ------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -... c. --------------------�- - --- !t Grade t T-t i•Pose ON CENTER �__� MUST BE IN INCREMENT (BC1M1f1 OF 6' D WIDTH) Rat r inlh V. 47 *l--.\ 5'sa Past Hftm of k" NO SCALLOP PK3CETS a i \ 250 Wat(114 tAid) 2 Izr:iz-z'z 3-t17 ! [_tII S i117 6' U �( - B 73- 83' aw W 103' 709' Socbon Cap y G 2T 91' 31' 32 33' 33' -070'WaC 1 Top h&Zm rail 2)6-tT E 2 2 2t 2 2� 2 zb&r6� Rsl him morpco F t4 k t°v°st - SNXh Ca9 - POR CktiTss5an of K+- - Gala and Nutga porgy � - �4'Te9ar t�aa)mte pasts ��i� � ftevarsibla straps Sbndard � ! S!o!fa shtpW ASum7rturn charN+et ka tutpport i (aIlse�Dons) 070'W t 2"— Walpole Woodworkers,, PaQe 3^_Universal 3/03 767 East Strcct,Walpofc,MA 02081 (508)668-' - AT'rtc� t�W N Sf4 . 5 ,t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 �r�OsoR•co TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 December 10,2004 Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn: Judy Schuler RE: Scott Leonard 1000 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT. Dear Ms.Schuler: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its regular meeting of December 7,2004,gave conditional approval for the connection to-the Town's sewerage system of a commercial building at 1000 f006 Sullivan Ave.,South Windsor,CT,as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Topographic Plan for Scott Leonard"prepared by Design Professionals,Inc,Project No. 1585,Drawing No.5,dated 9-29- 04,revised 11-10-04,and.subject to the following conditions: 1. Draft agreement for an easement between owner of private cross country line and developer to be reviewed by the Town Attorney. 2. Easement allowing the Town access to property for monitoring purposes to be reviewed and approved by Town Attorney. 3. Connection charges for 1.59 acres in the amount of$4,774.77 to be paid at time permit is issued. 4. Any change in the project,other that originally presented,be brought back to WPCA fo further approval. = 5,•. . Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. . 6. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority,and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, Jos h J.Carino,Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority JC:dd Cc: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager Michael J.Gantick,Director of Public Works Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer Marcia Banach,Director of Planning v/ Chris Dougan,Chief Building Inspector Scott Leonard STATE OF CONNECTICUT �oN cTtc�, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION a y° DISTRICT I 3 0� 1107 Cromwell Avenue �yrOP TaP�y� Rocky Hill., Connecticut 06067 Phone: December 20, 2004 Mr. Bruce Hillson, P.E. DEC 2 8 2004 Traffic Engineering Solutions 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 Dear Mr. Hillson: Subject: Commercial Site Route 194 Town of South Windsor We have reviewed your plans for the above-noted subject revised November 10, 2004 entitled "PROPERTY OF SCOTT LEONARD SITE PLAN" and the following are our comments: 1. Revise the pavement markings as shown in red on the enclosed sheet. When these changes have been made, a copy of these pavement changes must be resubmitted to us as well as to STC for their review and approval. 2. Please see the checked items on the enclosed Drainage Requirements Checklist. Please revise two (2) sets of plans, 40-scale or larger, reflecting the above-noted comments. A completed application; a Bond (on State form CLA-5) in the amount of$10,000 in the contractor's name; a Certificate of Insurance(on State form CON-32 Rev. 7102) requiring Bodily Injury Liability($1,000,000—Each Accident or Occurrence and Property Damage Liability,Aggregate$2,000,000); and a check or money order in the amount of$100.00 made payable to"Treasurer—State of Connecticut"and proof of town approval will also be required. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Peter E. Palazzi, Transportation District Services Agent. He can be reached at (860)258-4540. Very truly yours, David A. Sawicki Special Services Section Manager Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations Enclosures(2) cc: Town Planning and Zoning An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled or recovered paper t Or'N at r Town O-P s-0-tdA V&U:140t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 ��Osoe�c°�' TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL November 22, 2004 Judy A. Schuler Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms:Schuler: Re: Appl#04-60P,Leonard Site Plan of Development We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on November 16, 2004 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Site Plan of Development. This approval is for the construction of two buildings and associated driveway and parking on property located 1000-1004 Sullivan Avenue, GC zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc, Job No. 1585, dated September 29, 2004, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement.of any site work,.a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until-the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3.. This_ application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$5,000.. 4. . An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.11 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. A landscape.bond in the amount of$5,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 6. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 7. This approval does not constitute approval of the sanitary sewer, which can only be granted by the Water Pollution Control Authority. 8. The building street number must be included on the final plan. 9. Pavement markings must be maintained in good condition throughout the site drives and parking areas. 10. The access management requirements are hereby waived in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.A.2.e.4. because the topography of the abutting Colony Shops site makes a shared access and circulation system impractical. 11. Buffer must meet the requirement of Section 10.4 of the zoning regulations. The buffer is to be designed in accordance with the alternative buffer proposal presented by the applicant(decorative plastic privacy fence). Final buffer plan is subject to approval by Town Staff. 12. The Town Engineer's review comments dated 11-16-04 must be addressed to the Town Engineer' satisfaction. 13. Site lighting to be turned off overnight. 14. The fast food restaurant is not permitted to have a drive-thru window. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet #4 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, �tJ Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission THW/pmm cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal t O.NN Sr C� U 7-au� F 01Psiou � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 l�OSOR•co TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 January 7,2005 Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn: Judy Schuler RE: Scott Leonard 1000- 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT Dear Ms.Schuler: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its regular meeting of January 4,2005,gave approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a commercial building at 1000—1006 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,CT,as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Topographic Plan— Scott Leonard", prepared by Design Professionals,Inc.,Project No. 1585,Drawing No.5,dated 9-29-04, revisedl1-10-04, 12-08-04, 12-20-04,01-04-05 and subject to the following conditions: 1. An easement reviewed and approved by the Town Attorney allowing the Town access to the property of monitoring purposes. 2.- Agreement(s)between the property owners to be reviewed by the Town Attorney. 3. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. 4. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority,and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, q A L-z Jo4h J.Carin ,Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority JC:dd Cc: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager Michael J.Gantick,Director of Public Works Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer �/Marcia Banach,Director of Planning Chris Dougan,Chief Building Inspector Scott Leonard t0WN at� � u 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 OR•c TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 February 17, 2005 Mr. Scott Leonard 360 Lavender Lane Rocky Hill, CT 06095 Re:Preconstruction Meeting—App104-60P, Leonard Site Plan Megl 1000-1006 Sullivan Avenue, LLC Dear Mr. Leonard: IN ATTENDANCE Evelyn Perry SBC 40 Brainard Road 860 725-1011 Denise Mazzoli Cox Cable 801 Parker Street 860 432-5041 Brad Downey Annulli& Sons 147 Hale Road 860 644-2427 George Lee Northeast Retail 360 Bloomfield Ave 860 683-9000 Scott Leonard 110 Lavender Lane 860 550-2323 Judy Schuler DPI 165 South Satellite Rd 860 291-8755 Laurie Fiore Yankee Gas 112 Prospect Hill Rd 860 292-2249 Bernie Drabek TOSW 1540 Sullivan Ave 860 644-2511 x241 Michele Lipe TOSW 1540 Sullivan Ave 860 644-2511 x252 Melvin Stead TOSW 1540 Sullivan Ave 860 648-6366 Jeff Doolittle TOSW 1540 Sullivan Ave 860 644-2511 x244 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1: All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place-prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or- if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Sullivan Avenue. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight(48)hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist (requested,required) for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six (6)inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete,two (2)inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures, pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 6. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. . 7. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 8. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Brad Downey in the field at phone number 860 644-2427. 9. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 10. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 11. Seventy-two - (72)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 12. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 13. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m.,no work on Sunday. 14. DOT permit needed for all work within state road. Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 15.No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 16. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore, the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 17. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as-builts. 18. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals, the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. Planning Department I. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. A landscaping bond in the amount $5,000 and an erosion and sedimentation in the amount of$5,000 are required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 3. Mylars must go on file prior to building permits. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting(if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6- 800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kak cc: Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer Karl Reichle,Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works Chris Dougan, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control CL&P SNET BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE• aka CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER � (.., 1 c�®b - )a o(, SJ j f) yci L(- C tt i NAME & ADDRESS I (u LG ve h-e )aUtt -iu'v� PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS /� Vc, v) LOT SUBDIVISION P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER oq- &,o L.2 r'l G✓d f� �l cis AMOUNT OF BOND 0 1� i CHECK NUMBER S Ll Lf (o b L/ DEPARTMENT SUBMITTED BY 1 1'7 NAME DATE tt � RECEIVED BY FINANCE F a3 t NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 5 b o d 6 o S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc � f i TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE F FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: c e! CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON 11c d y( Phone No Ye 11 1 C/ 3`( Address S35 (_) ICJ S-jCk f4 6e(j rl ct- 1 k. r'1 c.1 C_+- ()b!t?'' Site Name Sc 0-14L Cor1rt Y') k ru ec P&Z No. Owner 5 c o 4 4 -t u ri c_ �.(� Phone No. Contractor !:Y' Signature of Owner :-'f-•%%'� Date: Signature of DesgY` gr.. "rye Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) 1 o o le? 4 I I ! v c' •'i A v C C+ 63, C,k r1r e. 1 k E✓ `)r, :�4 o r C G,n e• 2S 1. 4 o-� 1 C�' L 4-t> ! - Yt) v^� -E )[ r c c r d.. 40 r04,--3 i('•" 1 r -S 1& r - GL.- <,; it C rn Cy i J Reason for Q, Chainge: (Why is change required) c ���.� tt7•l c,�fa'�.1� �c� .�' uF tJ�:— r r <44 12 4_S . APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning }�;� ( j (.c, t%,- Date: r 1� -1 Town Engineer �: Yam �- Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: S Irv-�rf, rfr iv T C )/-LkD White - Town Engineer Ye., low - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department Stormceptor CD Sizing Program United States Version 4.0.0 Project Details Project 1000-1006 Sullivan Ave. Project# Location South Windsor,Ct. Company Design Professional,Inc. Date Feb.22,2005 Contact Judy Schuler Selected Rainfall Station PU2.65 f Connecticut Diam.(um Gravity HARTFORD BRADLEY AP 345620) 160 1.30 N 41 deg 56 min 601.80e W 72 deg 40 min 150 .20 FImpervious e Parameters 400 .652000 .65 1.15 s(%) 100 a(ac) 1.15 Stormceptor Sizing Table Stormceptor Model %Runoff Treated %TSS Removal STC 450 64 73 STC 900 82 81 STC 1200 82 Dr® STC 1800 82 81 81 STC 2400 91 85 STC 3600 91 86 STC 4800 96 89 STC 6000 96 89 STC 7200 98 91 STC 11000 99 93 STC 13000 99 94 STC 16000 100 95 Comments v Project calls for Baysaver 1 K LR- 0- Rim to Invert=7.2 ft. a,„�•�,Invert to bottom outside=8.67 ft. �1.i �Total depth of hole for BaySaver is 15.87 ft.STC 900 Rim ttobott m outs. A P EInvert to bottom outside=5.67 ft. Total depth of hole for STC=12.87 ft. 1�14flR T ENC����z _ -� ENT, ;Stormceptor' Order Form Y This document is to be included on SWM Plan by the designs Which plant will be manufacturing the unit: 90° Manhole# Finish Top grade elevation(ft) inlet pipe invert(ft) 180 p ��Ka Outlet pipe invert(ft) tf3 ffpPf� oulet y inlet Pi e Type IZcP #K Inlet Pipe Inside Dia.(in)(ID]_ I�l'fitDP Outlet Pipe Inside M.(in) [TD] 2700 Draw the orientation of Wet(max 2)and outlet pipes(/)on the diagram Clearly mark rite inlet pipe with an 17"and the outlet pipe with an "O" "Be sure to provide the fillet/outlet pipe angle in degrees _..Stortnceptor Model#(Circle One . 900 1200 1800 2400 3600 6000 7200 Install. Type Circle One ommercta Tnd yP ( ) ustrial Restdenttal Highway/DOT Gas Station Mun/Govt Other(Be specific as oss'ble). _(Circle One). : Sin�1e In1e Multiple Inlet im ervious Drainage area in acres) This installation is...(Circle One): New Construction or RetrnJ"tt - Contractor Information: r - Contractor _<<) %k c c;x (�'w. Contact Person Ce r Phone(gG� ) Fax1_ G) Owner(Maintalner) reformation: Owner S'c.., e-z>V' x Contact Person _ . . Phone (AGO ) ;1 14 Fax f 1 Project Derails: K .. .Name of Project: lO a a --(00 4 5 D LAk,' t ign Firm r' s. Pro s$' 3 k c• Deliver insert by(date) nn Address of Installation (©�-�00a 6 Sal��y r � J� City S o L-1 L0;„A,.,r State Designer Contact Phone_(*) ;6 1 -9-7S-Y- Fsz ( 1 Approving Agency Contact phone 'Pleuse tnclu&any signiftemtt demils ahm t thu project for camderalion in press re featlrr¢grtreks below(use esrra shee/s if required) 6J ® Please fax this sheet back to:CSR'New ngland Pipe at(413)562-7010 Attn: Greg Y hbin For technical assistance please call Greg toll free nt(800)331-4605 All lifting apparatus to be provided by the installation contractor Technical Manual Page 23 Appendix A STC 900 Precast Concrete Stormceptor° (900 US Gallon Capacity) Stormceptor Cover 32"0 And Grate �� Intlet_ O 00 ou-et Grade Adjusters to ; t�9.5o Suit Finished Grade 5 . . 6"0 oil 8" d`. a 30"0 Cleanout Plan View d 72'10 1 d 6" �.�. 7„ See Note#fi StormcI,eseortr0 Outlet TNv z Inlet s weir Variable --��— Diameter Orifice Hi Plate 18�" t6" 4A* Min. Drop Tee Inlet Pie 24"0 prop Rubber Gasket --J 8" Outlet Pipe Per ASTM C-443 ' Outlet Connection Detail 4"to 6"Overlap C. P u I f S.,.s�.s E. Fw �. 1' '! e '`"•``L e £CIOCir�!iiime $ DATE 6" f —; 6" 1� Notes: Enlarged Inlet Tee Drop Pipe learaestiansnmmended at Thy Inlet and Outlet where Applicable. 2.The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Outlet Drop Pipe and The Vent Pipe. 3.The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents:#4985148, #5498331,#5725760,#5753115,#5849181. Stormceptor° r Technical Manual Page 35 Appendix A Stormceptor® Disc Disc Type Insert Detail FIBERGLASS REINFORCED FRP LIFTING LUG WITH GP POLTESTER RESIN (TYP.OF 3) 2"PLATFORM FOR DRAINAGE 13" 71 1/8"0 TOP 71314"0 BTM. I OF INSERT A' 23" 19.5" 18.5" W i INLET OUTLET 14"x 12.5"OPENING FOR THE ORIFICE PLATE 24"0 OUTLET i B"O 6"0 PVC COUPLING UNIT A(in.) 80(in.) C(In.) PLAN VIEW STC 900 16 6 16 STC 1200 16 6 16 STC 1800 16 6 16 71 118" STC 2400 44 8 44 STC 3600 44 8 44 STC 4800 44 10 44 STC 6000 44 10 44 8" 9" STC 7200 44 12 44 — 19" & A C + � 18" + i ---- , E �2O DROP 0 OGOI NPI DROP TEE OUTLET PIPE INLET PIPE 71314" I i SEC FIONW-WTHRU CHAMBER Stormceptor° New England past Update: 5/29101 ; 41 STORMCEPTOR WEIGHT SHEET F STC 4501 STC 900 48"0 x 39" Extended.Base 5,720 lbs. 72"0 x 38" Extended Base 9,870 lbs. _ A";; 48"0 Riser Section 860 Ibs./ft 72"0 Riser Section 1,514 lbs./ft 48"o Top Slab 1,700 lbs. 72"0 Top Slab 3,600 lbs. STC 1200 STC 1800 ' 72"0 x 56" Extended Base 12,1401bs. - 72"0 x 56" Extended Base 12,140 lbs. 72"0 Riser Section 1,514lbs./ft 72"0 Riser Section 1,514lbs.tft. 72"0 To Slab 3,600 lbs. 72"0 Top Slab 3,600 lbs. P f STC 2400 (96"portion over-dimensional) STC 3600 (96"portion over-dimensional) i 96"0 Base Slab 8,700 lbs. 96"0 Base Slab 8,700 lbs. ;; 96"0 x 60"Riser Section 15,200 lbs. 96"o x 50" Riser Section 12.660 lbs. 96"o to 72"o Reducer 5,700 lbs. 96"o to 72"o Reducer 5,700 lbs. 72"o Riser Section 1,514 Ibs./ft 72"0 Riser Section 1,514 lbs./ft. 72"0 Top Slab 3,600 lbs. 72"0 Top Slab 3,600 lbs, STC 4800 (120"portion over-dimensional) STC 6000 (120"portion over-dimensional) 120"o Base Slab 14,240 lbs. 120"o Base Slab 14,240 lbs. 120"o x 45".Riser Section 16,070 lbs. 120"0 x 56" Riser Section 20,000 lbs. '120"0 to 7`'0 Reducer 13,780 lbs. 120"0 to 72"o Reducer 13,780 lbs. 72"o Riser Section 1,514 Ibs.tfoot 72"0 Riser Section 1,514 lbs./ft. 72"o Top Slab '` 3,600 lbs. 72"o Top Slab 3,600 lbs. STC•'7200 (144%portion over4mensional) STC 11,000 (120"portion over-dimensional) 144"o Base Slab 24,000:lbs. 120"0 Base Slab 14,240 lbs. 144"e x 48" Riser Section 21,1,75lbs. 120"0 x 45" Riser Section 16,070 lbs. 144"o"ta-7.2" Reducer 18,760,Ibs. 120"0 to 96" Reducer 9,940 lbs. 72"o Riser.Section 1,514 lbs./foot 96"o Riser Section 3,040lbs./ft. 72"o Top Slab 3,600_lbs. 96"o Top Slab 6,840 lbs. STC 13,000 (120"portion over-dimensional) STC 16,000 (144"portion over-dimensional) 120"0 Base Slab 14,240 lbs. 144"o Base Slab 24,000lbs. 120"d x 56"o Riser 20.000 lbs. 144"o x 48" Riser Section 21,175lbs. 120"o to 96"o Reducer 9,940.lbs. 144"o to 96"o Reducer 9,940Ibs. 96"o Riser 3,040 lbs./ft. 96"o Riser Section 3,040lbs./ft- 96"o Top Slab 6,840 lbs. 96"o Top Slab 6,840ibs. 'note STC 7200 & 144"portion of STC 16,000 weights have not been verified yet, they are approximate DEC-11-2003 16:26 203 265 4941 95% P.03 \ � z 5 CONIC. WALK --' LPZ ♦♦ Lpi , 24 0 ,J ,,� �p p5 ��♦♦♦ / r O �S 15.7 m ell 'e s--ox - - - - -\mac 0Q ' 1 ' Gs 834 F N n� z ` \ 6 S117 121.5 LF `6" PVC SOR 35 O S•237C 15 HDP� cr. \\ ^ 3Ay g / ® S= (A I Jib EXISTING m s' TYP ' _ S I S13'4W4 49.22' » : 28.2 0 1 In 90 9 LF 15 P r IN IN:12 90 a 23.9 LP1 S-1 x rye. IN OUT: 2.90 1 Lp o q 0�... 40'f.Y. � NOTE 6 1 �� BU NG �10 23 LF N 15 HD 2, g 5" ♦ "1 124 `"""".r.�...,�-�-gG 1 » R DP S- lini � x MtN• ♦ ` � 20. ® "1. PR P. "T TO ~ t20 _ F PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN 12. LF A 0 OF `4�TIET STRUCTUR �� ioI 12 c� � V N 4» '12G.00- 171 P `� ® =1.0 (N IN i ( ). PROPOSE SIGN N nI M pp 1A i7f V OUT 15"):120.00 e- P N sK?•, 1 0 `� IEx s*�Au, ;Wv W • EMS ie P. "' Ex/ SI T AR J.'tf� - - (ND TOPS rwAS•Y B ' - PROP,+1K BAY57411ER - .. - - � \♦ r �� � TF:129.50 {S $ 283-0 (STORAGE MH) f �cT>P-1c 1 (SEE DETAIL) {s SID ALK "mono z l,�a REPLA EO M TO 8E - �6_ °`` - 25-R WI2i.83 R ovE AREA SIDEWALKToa _ 119.59�� �' I V IN(8'):i ta.a9 EN PANP�QS REPLACED 0 SANITARY - - �- .. �^- 0�:LdL7CflON 0 SAL INSTALL WHITE � I APPROX�L'OCATIaP1' " • - - r 4�t.._ 8"0 TARY EEP PERMANENT 1 6"0 SANITARY LATERAL' - - - AL MARKING ARROW T't DEEP f `� ~I` `" - f PROPOSED PAVEMENT 5' TT 12&JWJ MARKINGS y /NY. le,(I'VA. 2x9 1 INSTALL 50 I SINGLE %HI M�DICA /NV Ts"f0f/7).12J REPLACE LANE LINE 12- f ( M' l(II1tG \��` VWTH CUl 50 ft •I 1 f I k ,\ nN�rj II ra.���\♦ e Ali PROPOSED PAVEMENT ■ swsr. ,1, _� MARKINGS COMMON DRl VEWA Y � SER l/lMG N/F TWO THY _ TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: c CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON JJA Dy .SG H U L e P, Phone No. 8"-29J-87 Z3FV'4 TH SA rp,A-L I TC X o 41 Address ©E51mjy PK0FF$510NAL5 )MG. SPUTH rJWo-5GK. GT 6,c7+ Site Name 10d0- 1004P SNA-wVAA1 AVE. P&Z No. 0+ -&OP Owner 56077 /L E b AW h Phone No. 3&0•'7Z{- `�Z 1�- Contractor ANM L..J- S0jV DA)7- G?' D RA D P01W NrlY Signature of Owner Dates, J 11 - Signature of Design Engr. Date: ✓-4-© :. CHANGE:, (Describe location a d e of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) /NGREASE S►ZE OF CONGRET ,!fL11T"1 LiTX) PAP F'O& ESTA N A -r K - -rA1L HUILVI " bi RV I FEE C XT'ENA Ti> E OF 141L- i A . SE VISE SrR E E NI IV ej ANJV I-A/yDSGArl tj G7 A'AD"A1 D 1,1TIL_IT Y PAD- Reason for Change: (Why is change required) To A044H OvAT*E EAWiPHt NT MA "TIUI7Es. 4APPROVALS:, (As R@quired) �5'lDir. Of Planning ��'tf&t�t;� f`� .-;= .t Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS jX�t'f �� � ��-l�rLc.r( 1.1f1 ��'1 G•�.�IA�U. ��-P/�l.�G.C,'�~{ (�3 4, W RECEIVED White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering DepartmaKt 2005 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEP I �1111F _ - �.�i�-gym a►\ t�,� ` ® I PROP. !!. ,bow .' ,• So RETAIL 1,M SF\& RESTAUR,kNT/FAST Z. • .,� ,��toiii of ir .1 i i �J a ,-PROP.45.00 oil o ref. 1 I .FAPW-1 R-JUUb H U8:IIH H!? HNNULLI rmA IYU. ODU U44 UUUU aaa a. F1 _..__ .Le7 .TG µsr I w ! GOI A - 0 APfPUK 22)422 N e PAD MtwFl�p VS�. �tt.1�►t�G 41 I. STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION y° DISTRICT I 3 e� a. 1107 Cromwell Avenue �2rOF r%P`�ye Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 Phone: Wo 1 (V i) P .tune 6, 2005 RECEIVED JUN - 9 2005 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNPNG DEPT. Ms. Judy A. Schuler Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms. Schuler: Subject: Scott Leonard Site Plan Route 194 Town of South Windsor We have reviewed your plans for the above-noted subject and the following are our comments: 1. The pavement markings and signing on Route 194(Sullivan Avenue) and the site drive shall be installed by the developer as marked in red on the enclosed plan and in accordance with the"Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", latest edition. The developer will be responsible to maintain signs and pavement markings on the site drive. 2. Attached is a copy of the Department's Signing and Pavement Marking Plan for this area. Please revise this plan to incorporate the proposed driveway and lane-use changes. An electronic copy can be forwarded to you for your use. Please contact Michael Cloutier at (860) 594-2798 to arrange for an electronic copy of this file. 3. The proposed driveway radius should be modified to accommodate a WB-50 design vehicle, if this type of vehicle is expected to make deliveries to the site. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Peter E. Palazzi, Transportation District Services Agent. He can be reached at (860) 258-4540. Very truly yours, r? David A. Sawicki Special Services Section Manager Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations Enclosures(2) cc: Town Planning and Zoning An Equal Opportunity Employe?- Printed on recycled or recovered paper k VOL. 17 2 8 PAGE 15 .1 (417 DECLARATION OF MUTUAL EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY.UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE DECLARATION (the "Declaration") made this day 15th of June, 2005 by M.E.G.L. 1000 to 1006 Sullivan Ave LLC,acting herein by Scott Leonard, duly authorized and Timothy Moriarty, of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter collectively referred to as the"Declarant"or the "Declarants". WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, Declarants are the owners of certain contiguous parcels shown on a map or plan entitled: "NEED THE FINAL APPROVED AND RECORDED SITE PLAN TITLE" which map or plan is on file with the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor to which reference may be had. The certain subject easement area is partially located on the property of the Declarants as shown on the aforementioned map. The lots shall hereinafter be referred to as "Easement Properties"). WHEREAS, Declarants do not desire to have the Easement Properties serviced by separate driveways, but rather to establish a mutual easement arrangement which will service the Easement Properties and which will provide ingress and egress to and from Sullivan Avenue and provide a location (or locations) for the installation of utilities, including storm drainage facilities to service the Easement Properties and/or the aforementioned lots individually; and WHEREAS,Declarant desires to establish this Declaration of Easement to create an easement on,over, under and through the Easement Area for the benefit of the Easement Properties; and WHEREAS, Declarant further desires to impose certain covenants and restrictions upon the use,operation and maintenance of the Easement Area; WHEREAS, the Easement Properties are specifically made part of this Agreement, and the owners of the Easement Properties.shall receive the benefits and be subject to the burdens contained herein. IIIIIIIIIIIII�II�'�IIII'III'�II'IIII� I. Book ID: 000390 II�II'II'I�IIIIIII�III��II'III'IIIIf'�III Filelf 4178page 351 00 57Ype: LAN 111 Initials Initials `_i -- VOL. 1728PAGE 152 NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby submit the Easement Area to the terms, covenants, restrictions and easements set forth herein for the benefit of the Easement Properties as follows: I. - GRANT OF EASEMENT Declarants do each hereby grant and declare, for the benefit of the Easement Properties, an easement and right of way over, upon, under and through the Easement Area, which easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the Easement Properties and may be used by the owners of the Easement Properties,their heirs,successors,assigns,licensees and guests. II. USE OF EASEMENT AREA The Easement Area shall be used for the purposes of ingress and egress to and from Sullivan Avenue by vehicular and pedestrian traffic and for the installation of utility lines, including storm drainage facilities, together with any appurtenances related thereto (hereinafter referred to as "Utilities"in order to furnish utility services to the Easement Properties. The owners of the individual lots comprising the Easement Properties (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owners" and individually referred to as "Owner") shall have the right in common with the other Owners to enter on, over, under and through the Easement Area for the purpose of construction, installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the driveway and of Utilities, provided, however, that any Owner/Owners who shall do any work or have any work done affecting the Easement Area shall provide the other owner with reasonable written notice of pending activity concerning the easement area and (upon completion of the work by such Owner/Owners)shall repair that portion of the Easement Area to the condition that existed prior to such Owners entry (except for any work done pursuant to the rights created herein) and shall at all times keep so, much of the existing driveway open so that vehicular and pedestrian traffic shall have access from Sullivan Avenue to the Easement Properties. III. ACT EXPEDITIOUSLY When utilizing the Easement Area, the Owners shall do so as expeditiously as possible and in a manner to cause the least disturbance to the other Owners. IV. OWNERS MAY USE EASEMENT AREA BUT MAY NOT INTERFERE. The Owners of any portion of the Easement Area may use the Easement Area in any way that will not prevent the use of the Easement Area by any other Owner for the purposes described herein. The Owners of the Easement Area shall not erect or allow any structures to be erected on the Easement Area, nor shall they plant or allow to be planted or grown any large trees or any other obstructions which would prevent the use of the Easement Area by the other Owners. *Nothing contained in this paragraph shall diminish the rights and obligations of the Owners of the 'casement Area which are established in this Declaration. 2 Initials Initials VOL. 1.728PAGE 153 V. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF EASEMENT AREA Declarant declares that the Owners shall maintain the Easement Area in its present condition or in the condition to which it is improved from time to time, and shall repair the same as necessary, and shall keep the same reasonably free and clear of ice and snow, and shall keep the Easement Area insured with respect to liability. The cost of all necessary repairs, maintenance, snow and ice removal, clearing of the driveway thereon shall be paid proportionately by the Owners based on a ration of the acreage of each Owners contiguous property which utilizes the easement area unless otherwise referred to in this agreement. This ration as of this date is 76% for `M.E.G.L. 1000 TO 1006 Sullivan Ave. LLC' and 24% for Timothy Moriarty. Therefore, each Owner shall be proportionately responsible for the cost (the Required Share). The rest of this declaration of Easement notwithstanding, no Owner shall be responsible for any expenses hereunder until a Building Permit has been obtained from the Town of South Windsor to construct a building upon their lot. Therefore, when determining the cost hereunder, the lots for which no Building Permit has been issued shall not he included. The cost of maintenance, repair and replacement of Utilities within the Easement Area shall be borne by the specific Owner/Owners whose individual lot/lots is/are benefited by such Utilities, and if more than one Owner is benefited, then such cost shall be borne on the same proportionate basis as set forth above. Once Utilities are installed in the Easement Area, then any Owners shall have the right to "tie in" to the Utilities, provided that they shall do so in a good and proper manner without damage to the Utilities. Any Owner who shall, through the negligence or willful action of himself, itself or their respective agents, guests or invitees, causes any damage which must be repaired hereunder shall be responsible for the cost incurred to provide the repairs, maintenance and replacement necessitated by the negligence or willful action of that Owner, provided, however, that the Declarant and all subsequent Owners mutually waive their respective rights of recovery against each other for any loss insured by fire, extended coverage and other property insurance policies existing for the benefit of the respective parties. The cost for repairing, replacing, maintaining or improving the Easement Area, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be shared as set forth above. Except as herein provided, no costs of any kind shall be charged to any Owner, unless that Owner has agreed in writing to pay said costs. In the event that the Owner of any lot shall decide that expenditures shall be incurred for repair and replacing, maintaining.or improving the Easement Area, then said Owner shall send. written notice to the other Owners which shall request that the other Owners agree to pay their Required Share. Said notice shall contain a detailed description of the intended activities in the easement area as well as price quotations from the contractors to perform said activities. In the event that the other Owners agree to pay their Required Share in writing, then the cost shall be shared accordingly. In the event that the other Owners do not agree in writing to pay their Required Share, then the Owner proposing said activity and any Owners who agree to pay their Required Share may undertake said activity solely at their own cost and expense.In that event,after the work is completed, the Owner/Owners performing the work may seek arbitration against the other Owners who should have contributed to the cost,but did not. 3 Initials Initials VOL. 1728PAGE 154 In the event that the work was necessary to maintain the Easement Area to the standard required hereunder, and if the work was done to the quality required,then the Owners who should have shared said cost shall be responsible for their Required Share of the cost, and the Owner/Owners who performed the work shall be entitled not only to be reimbursed by the other Owners for their Required Share, but the performing Owner/Owners shall also receive the expenses incurred in said collection, including reasonable attorney's fee if a court action is instituted. All repairs, replacement, maintenance or improvements made to the Easement Area shall be made to a quality customarily suitable to accomplish the purposes for which the Easement Area has been created. V.a Liability Insurance Each Owner shall maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount normal and customary for commercial purposes for the easement area, according to insurance standards at time of policy issue. Each owner acknowledges that the amount of coverage required may change over time. VI. PERMANENT EASEMENT. The easement created herein shall be a permanent easement and shall bind the Declarant,all subsequent Owners,their hem,successors and assigns. VII. INTEREST DUE WITH REGARD TO UNPAID OBLIGATIONS. In the event of a failure by any Owner to pay his or its Required Share of any costs or expenses incurred hereunder, such costs and expenses shall, commencing thirty (30) days after the date of billing therefore, bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum until paid. Any Owner failing to make payments of his or its Required Share shall be responsible for any costs, including reasonable attorney's fees,incurred by any other Owner to compel payment thereof. VIII. GRANT AND RESERVATION. Declarant hereby reserves the right to grant rights of access over the Easement Area to any utility company required by the Department of Public Utility Control of the State of Connecticut or to the Town of South Windsor for the purposes herein contained. The Owners will sign any documents required by the aforementioned utility companies or the Town of South Windsor to carry out the intent of this paragraph which is to provide utility service to the Easement Properties. The Owners shall further have the right to exercise temporary sloping rights in areas adjacent to the easement Area if necessary to utilize said Easement Area in accordance with the terms of this Agreement,provided any areas so utilized shall be reasonably restored in a timely manner. IX. COVENANTS,AGREEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. The covenants, agreements and restrictions set forth herein shall be effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until written agreement of all of the Owners of the lots comprising the Easement Properties, and all parties holding mortgages secured by any lots comprising the Easement Properties shall modify, terminate or release this Declaration of Easement, which modification shall be effective when recorded in the South Windsor Land Records. The covenants,agreements and restrictions herein may not be terminated nor may any limit be imposed on the annual expenses to be paid by any owner without the written agreement of all said Owners. 4 Initials Initials VOL. 1'7 2 8 PAGE 15 5 X. SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATIONS. All modifications to this agreement shall be in writing and signed by the Owners of all properties benefited or burdened by the easement rights created herein and recorded in the South Windsor Land Records. The Owner requesting such modification shall reimburse the other owner for reasonable expenses incurred to review and assess the requested modification unless the owners agree otherwise in writing. XI. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The covenants,agreements and restrictions contained herein shall be covenants running with and for the benefit of and burden upon the Easement Properties and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Owners thereof and their respective heirs, successors and assigns.The rights granted herein shall be considered to create permanent easements. B. All communications sent pursuant to this Declaration shall be sent in writing and sent by certified mall to the last known address of the recipient. XII. MERGER. The easement rights created herein shall not merge with the fee ownership interest of any lot. XIII. RESTORATION. At any time that any Owner shall exercise any rights hereunder, then, when said activity is completed, the Easement Area shall be restored to the condition it was in immediately prior to said activity,except to the extent permitted hereunder. 5 0- Initials Initials : von. 17 2 8 PAGE 156 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants have set their hands and seals this th day of June,2005. yr Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: M. . 10 06 SU IVAN NUE,LLC tt Leonard,duly authori Timothy]Moriarty _ STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. Glastonbury June/�,2005 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, Scott Leonard, duly authorized on behalf of M.E.G.L. 1000 to 1006 Sullivan Ave LLC, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the M.E.G.L. 1000 TO 1006 SULLIVAN AVENUE LLC Limited Liability Company,before me. P er Jay er ommissio er of the Superior Court STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. South Windsor COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the 15th -day of June, 2005, before me, personally appeared Timothy Moriarty, as aforesaid, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed thtsaiffe—fpr the urposes therein contaigod"96 his free act and deed. }j �KP 130q00 /Public f ° a gyp} 6 e Initials Initials J ' VOL. 17 28PAGE, 157 SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION based on MAP titled: "PROPERTY SURVEY RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: SCOTT LEONARD 1000 & 1006 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT" As prepared by Design Professionals,Inc165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074. MAP date: 09-29-04, Page 4/8, DRAWING NO: server/jobs/1585/1585_4. REC I ED.FOR RECORD: ATE 1 TIME ;aS M. kTrOWNIC&ERK, SOUTH WIN OR, CT Initials Initials DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects RECEIVED NOV 3 2005 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. November 2,2005 Marcia Banach,Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut RE: Letter of Lighting Compliance Leonard Property 1000& 1006 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut DPI Project No. 1585 Dear Marcia, At the request of the Town of South Windsor,Design Professionals,Inc. is providing a letter of compliance for the site lighting on the project noted above. The site lighting levels were observed on the evening of October 31,2005. The lighting levels were measured with an Ideal Industries,model 61-681,digital light meter. The lighting levels as measured were in general compliance with the approved lighting plan(LP-1),dated 9/29/2004. The 5 smaller lights/poles adjacent to the new buildings have been installed in the proper location and are of the approved manufacturer(Full cut-offs by Hanover Lanterns-Bronze in color).In addition to the site lighting, additional architectural entrance lighting on the building has been provided. Two wall sconces (100 watt incandescent,manufacturered by DayBrite)are at the bank entrance and increase the lighting level at the door to 8.35 foot candles(FtC). The lighting levels along the sidewalk between the two buildings are in conformance with the lighting levels of the approved plan.The actual light level at the intersection of the sidewalk and the driveway curb to the north was 1.65 FtC. The lighting in front of the retail/fast food restaurant has been enhanced with architectural wall lighting consisting of 3 equally spaced 70 watt metal halide BaseLite fixtures. These lights greatly enhanced the lighting in front of the commercial entrance doors to a level of 37 FtC. With the 3 additional lights,the lighting at the adjacent curb increased from the proposed 3.05 FtC to 5.0 FtC,however the lighting level decreases to 0.53 FtC at the back of the parking stall.This is in compliance to the approved plan. The 12 parking lot light poles and luminaires are in compliance with the approved lighting plan(LP-1), dated 9/29/2004,and are of the approved manufacturer(Full cut-offs by Hanover Lanterns-Bronze in color)and have been installed in the correct locations. They provide the minimum of 0.60 FtC throughout the parking areas.At the northerly property line and in front of the fence, light levels range from 0.05 FtC to 0.24 FtC.Lighting at the curb west of the bank's drive-thru canopy range from 0.15 FtC to 0.32 FtC. These light levels are within the range anticipated. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com 4 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects The lighting level along the front property line(Sullivan Avenue)is 0.40 FtC and 1.50 FtC at the intersection of the project's entrance sidewalk and the Sullivan Avenue existing sidewalk.These lighting levels are impacted by off-site CL&P street lighting to the east and across Sullivan Avenue from the developments entrance. The installed and operating site lighting appears to be in compliance with the intent of the approved lighting plan, Sincerely, i Ju AtScler,P. Richard L.Boston,RLA oject Engineer Director of Landscape Architecture pf L /= Q) I' C: Scott Leonard 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com w � 9 A . I 13 ' 7 ' 8 ' 0 0 Y SPLIT RAIL 4' SIDEWALK FENCE RETAINING WALL CRCCC CECTIOf� Tel. 860.291•8755 1.UNLESS OrrU LSE NOTED,EXISTING UTILITY REVISIONS GRAPHIC SCALE Fax s6o•2st•5757 PREPARED FOR: SHEET SHOULD B AS SHOWN ARE BASED�, 10 0 5 10 _Design LEONARD c��o�������oo� AVAILABLE INFORMATION.ALL EXISTING UTIU7IES 06, r SHOULD TI FIELD RE TO B PRIOR D CONSTRUCTION. ■ Of 8SS1On8IS, Inc. 2.ALL UTILITIES ARE TO 8E STAKED IN THE FIELD BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TD N � OF .a, THIS PLAN.s NVAUD UNLESS IT BEARS THE civil engineers • planners surveyors SULLIVAIN AVEN DRAW Br• MYA q nro: Bs IMPRESSION SEAL ANO ORIGINAL SIGNATURE 1 inch = 10 feet landscape architects • gis •gps OF 1HE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/SURVEYOR. NO. DATE DESCRIMION BY 1, South Satellite Road South Windsor. Connecticut 06074 SOUTH W1NDS0R, CONNECTICUT CXm By- RLB DATE: TT-4-04 7.' 13 ' 7 ' 15' 8 ' 0 0 SPLIT RAIL 4' SIDEWALK FENCE RETAINING WALL CROSS - SECTION I.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.EXISTING UTILITY REVISIONS Tel. 860.291•8755 LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON GRAPHIC SCAM Fax 860.291•8757 PREPARED FOR: SHEET AVAILABLE MELD VERIFIED ALL EXISTING"LITTECONSTRUCTION 10 0 5 1D ®Sign LEONARD ����������oo►� 1 SHOULD TI FIELD VERTO PRIOR D CONSTRUCTION. rofeSSlOnaIS, inc. 2.ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE STAVED N THE FIELD BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.N. civil engineers . planners . surveyors SULLIVANgn, A�lv a.7� OF oJ.THIS PLAN IS INVALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE DR-WV BY MHA vt:IB NO.: 1585 f THE PROFEPRESSION SSIONAL ENGINEER/SURD ORIGINAL V>1'R NO. DATE DESCR1P71ON er SIGN 1 inch = 10 feet landscape architects • gis .gpa 765 South Satellite Road South Wndsor, Connecticut 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR. CONNECTICUT CY(M BY, RCS DATE.' 11-4-04 BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: "� a 5 CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER �� (_ ! o0 - o Jc1 1'(ya L-t- C NAME & ADDRESS (y LG ye i, c1 a✓ L-o h ?\ocky �ktl C f— Noo I Goa -Inv PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS /I VC LOT SUBDIVISION P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER Dq, cis AMOUNT OF BOND { €� \ j,0 J ".a-r r el CHECK NUMBER j 5 g q (CoLl DEPARTMENT '� (,�(� h ;✓� SUBMITTED BY Cl NAME DATE RECEIVED BY FINANCE �q-f lc6 NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 5 D c) (OG a S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc SOW N sf4 ° Town o-P Sash 2At� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�Osoe co TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 August 16, 2006 Mr. Scott Leonard 110 Lavender Lane Rocky Hill, CT 06067 Dear Mr. Leonard: Re: Appl 004-60P, Leonard Site This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on August 15, 2006 to reduce the landscaping bond for the above referenced site from$5,000.00 to $1,000.00. At the same meeting the IWA/CC bond was released. A check will be sent to you from the Town of South Windsor reducing your bond to the above referenced amount. Very truly yours, Patrick Kennedy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission PK/pmm cc: Town Engineer 02/22/2016 21:23 FAX 001 SCOTT LEONARD P.O. BOX 412 RECEIVED ROCKY IULL, CT. 06067 M91550-2323 Town of South Windsor Planning Dept Attention Michelle Lipe SOUINWINDSORPLANNGDEPT. Reference: Landscape Bond 1000-1006 Sullivan Ave July 11, 2007 Dear Ms. Lipe, Would you please check the landscaping on my property listed in the reference above and if the: landscaping is in compliance the n would you please release the bond of $1000.00. Should there be any questions please feel'free to call me. Sincerely, Scott Leonard Y�o -5,5d 6 .3; - i' 10 N Sf4 04 G U S � w` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 f�OsoR.c° TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 August 27, 2007 Mr. Scott Leonard PO Box 412 Rocky Hill, CT 06067 Dear Mr. Leonard: Re: App104-60P,Leonard Site This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on August 21, 2007 to release the $1,000 landscaping bond for the above referenced project. A check will be sent to you from the Town of South Windsor reducing your bond to the above referenced amount. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511 ext. 252. Very truly yours, Patrick Kennedy, Chai __ Planning and Zoning Commission PK/dma cc: Town Engineer BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL DATE : U� CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER (- (� I�b0 _ ©� d xAvy L LC NAME & ADDRESS i aa-e_4 0 4 �O PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS- j ot�, l &AJ1d-PV,. 7l pe LOT P&Z' OR .IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER (a L SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required work has been completed. NAb� DATE �O 813c/ o7 By CHECK. # ISSUED DATE S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL.doc