The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSite Plan - Conservation (79) FEB e 3 ZUU4 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR South VVindsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY CONSERVATION COMMISSION INLAND WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION APPLICATION Application# 0 4 -D b ? Date Received c3 14-104 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Fifteen applications (15) with map and plans (2 copies) shall be submitted together with the fee set forth in the Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Regulations, Town of South Windsor. (See Regulations, Section VII—X) 2. The South Windsor Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Regulations should be reviewed with respect to the standards and criteria for application Evaluation. (See Regulations, Sections VII—X) 3. The applicant understands that this application is to be considered complete only when all information and documents required by the Agency have been submitted. The applicant shall also complete the state filing form. A. Applicant's Name: t4A�ifAk1 nf0 JJ[JtA6kX 1 /�<i. % �1R,• To6 d �f A�i��k Info Address: Ito eamr6rod Rom , �fouw Wllf4J4,2 Z Cr 6&074p- Phone: (home) (work) 6&0 fax) 060- Tq- B. Legal owner's name: Wit) PQ rg M— Address f&6 Ng V6k�f R Oa, \f0 U rlf 4I1A(,0 f 4R., Cr 0&074 Phone(home)&Q•64(4./110(work) (fax) (List additional owners, addresses, and phone numbers on back of application) C. If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property; a letter by the owner(s) authorizing the proposed regulated activity set forth in the application must accompany this form and will be part of the application. -D. Project Name(if any) \/Oftl OW 6 e rku 1. Contact Person(if further information is needed) kroo.,o 4-avAreg,46. qk- AJ(/1 0d /�(,, � VR,• (work) 8(00.6 88' 7L 88 (fax) 6&0-&88 Jq K E. The geographical location of the property which is to be affected by the proposed regulated activities including a description of the land in sufficient detail to allow identification of the property on the Inland Wetland and Watercourse Map. Aki-iaws w 125 5 Z Assessor's map # (19 Parcel# _4 5 Zone 7 F. Names of all abutting property owners from records in Town Clerk's office. (use separate sheet if necessary) �feg ATr&G g7b (alr G. Have you notified all abutting property owners (from records in Town Clerk's office) by certified letter that an application is pending before the Agency? I Mr ** (you are required to supply a copy of the letter with the list of the names of the abutters).** H. Purpose and description of all proposed regulated activity(s) including amount of disturbance in square feet and types of fill and the time element involved: SEA ArrA-�r��0 �E�krPrronl I. A class A-2 map of the property drawn to I"=40', showing the area to be developed, extent of the wetlands and watercourses affected, topography, existing and proposed activities and names and locations of adjacent property owners must be submitted. J. Amount of regulated area disturbance and types of fill(including wetlands and regulated buffers). K. Acreage of wetlands and watercourses in regulated areas to be altered: 0 AGR FJ' L. Acreage of wetlands and watercourses to be created: 0 M. Lineal feet of proposed stream alteration: 0 N. Total land area of project and percentage,which is wetlands: G N"D AR A q,tl 11 qCQe r r��rc A.r o Alter O. Identify all other permits or approvals that have been issued, applied for, or required with respect to the proposed activity set forth in this application. (These may include but not be limited to, local Planning & Zoning, Zoning Board of Appeals, D.E.P. F.E.M.A., D.O.T., The Army Corps of Engineers, and any other State, Local or Federal Permits.) J ti : Pr ,S okyl 4r6-R hlrCAM66 O r-( : M P. The applicant (or designated representative) hereby attests that a sign will be posted at the following location(s) By Name on or before the following date 8 Signature: These signs must be /isplayed continuously for at least ten (10) days prior to scheduled meeting (see Regulations, Section 7.3a) The undersigned hereby applies for the regulated activities listed in paragraph H above, for a Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation permit for the property described herein and confirms that: 1. She/he is familiar with the currently effective Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Regulations of the Town of South Windsor. 2. She/he understands that at any time during the review period, the Agency may require the applicant to provide more information about the wetlands and/or watercourses in question and/or any proposed activity. 3. All information submitted in the application for review shall be considered factual, or in the case of anticipated activity, binding. A knowing failure of the applicant or any of her/his agents to provide correct information, or performance exceeding the levels of activity anticipated, shall be sufficient grounds for revocation of any permit under these regulations. 4. By making this application, the applicant gives permission to the Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation Commission members and/or its representative to enter the portions of the premises which are subject of the application for the purpose of inspection and investigation and otherwise evaluating the merits of the ap tion both before and after a final decision has been issued. Signature o Owner of Property Date 9-3 - U Y Signature f Ap icant Date 2- 9 Attachment Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision February 2, 2004 H. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL PROPOSED REGULATED ACTIVITY(S) INCLUDING AMOUNT AND TYPES OF FILL AND THE TIME ELEMENT INVOLVED: Note: There are no activities within wetland areas and watercourses. Activities within 80-foot Wetlands Review Area 1. Storm drainage outlet with bio-filter and level spreader area. This area is located on the east side of.Nevers Road, opposite of the proposed subdivision and adjacent to open space property. Area of disturbance = 0.01± ac. Volume of cut = 15± cu.yds. Volume of fill = 10± cu.yds. Type of fill material: topsoil, gravel and stone Time involved: Approx. 1 month AlfordAssociates, ■ WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. IL I ■ WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. ENGINEERS N SURVEYORS ■ CHRISTIAN L ALFORD,P.E.&LS. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD ■ P.O.BOX 484 ■WINDSOR ■ CT OM ■ PHONE(860)M7288 ■FAX(6 0)68 I-M ■ALFORDQSNET.NET February 2, 2004 Inland Wetlands Agency / Conservation Commission Of the Town of South Windsor c/o Mr. Jeffrey H. Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Pending Application Site- Joseph Lane & 585± Nevers Road Applicant- Mannarino Builders, Inc. Dear Mr. Folger: As owner of the properties that comprise the proposed development, .I am giving consent to the proposed activities set forth in the pending application. Ve truly yours, David Patria ��■ sue ��► III e ♦ IMMARIMIL, M OWNERS OF PROPERTIES W/THIN 500 FEET OF "JOSEPH LANE ESTATES" SUBDI WS/ON - NOTE. ALL ADDRESSES REFER TO THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARCEL IDENTIFICATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 113 40 BRONISLAW & TEKLIA HANCHUK 510 NEVERS ROAD 125 21 9 ANDREW T., JR. & SUSAN BOLASEVICH 502 GRAHAM ROAD 125 22 10 CARL & ELSIE A. PIACENTINI 494 GRAHAM ROAD 125 23 11 CHRISTOPHER W. & MAURA ELTRINGHAM 486 GRAHAM ROAD 125 24 12 GARY J. & KIMBERLY A. GAUER 476 GRAHAM ROAD 125 25 9 KATHY L. EASTER 20 HERMAN WAY 125 26 10 BESSIE D. CLAY 30 HERMAN WAY 125 27 11 SAMAH CHAHROUR 44 JOSEPH LANE 125 28 12 PAULA K. PISANO 34 JOSEPH LANE 125 33 7 ETTA J. LU & HOWARD SOBOLOV 31.JOSEPH LANE 125 34 6 JACQUELINE ARCHER 41 JOSEPH LANE 125 35 5 MARY F. HORVATH 51 JOSEPH LANE 125 36 4 JEFFREY LENS DEFEO 59 JOSEPH LANE 125 37 3 DAVID C. MORISON 67 JOSEPH LANE 125 38 1 RICHARD L. & EMILY E. CARTER 605 NEVERS ROAD 125 39 DAVID A. & KATHRYN M. BEST 617 NEVERS ROAD 125 40 DONALD R. SHARP 635 NEVERS ROAD 125 41 THERESA GEDRIM 655 NEVERS ROAD 125 48 1 CARROLL S. STEARNS 30 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 125 49 DOUGLAS JOHNSON, TRUSTEE 33 MURIELLE DRIVE 125 50 11 SCOTT R. HUBBARD 39 WOOD POND ROAD 125 51 10 MARIA G. YONIKA 29 WOOD POND ROAD 125 52 9 FRANK W. & MARY DZEN 15 WOOD POND ROAD 125 53 JEAN K. PATRIA 565 NEVERS ROAD 125 54 2 WENDY J: DESPARD 548 NEVERS ROAD 125 55 DAVID A. PATRIA 565 NEVERS ROAD 125 56 2 DAVID PATRIA 565 NEVERS ROAD 125 57 2 KATHRYN A. & JOHN C., JR. PARKINS 39 STONEHEDGE LANE BOLTON, CT 06043 125 58 BRUCE P. & MARILYN D. PAJOT 45 LOON PLACE - LAKEWOOD 125 59 3 ANNA M. ZIDEK 11 HERMAN WAY 125 60 2 RALPH A. STARKWEATHER, JR. 458 GRAHAM ROAD 125 61 1 JOAQUIM J. PORTAL 450 GRAHAM ROAD 125 62 JOHN & EMMA A. SADONIS 432 GRAHAM ROAD 125 63 RICHARD K. STRONG 394 GRAHAM ROAD 125 64 CATHOLIC CEMETERIES ASSOCIATION 700 MIDDLETOWN AVENUE OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 HARTFORD INC. 125 75 4 JEFFREY B. HEALD 427 GRAHAM ROAD 125 76 DOMINIC & SHIRLEY L. NANCI 435 GRAHAM ROAD 125 77 KAREN H. THORKILDSEN PO BOX 510248 MELBOURNE BEACH, FL 32951 125 78 NACHELLE EVERT 455 GRAHAM ROAD 125 79 1 MADELEINE M. FAVREAU 461 GRAHAM ROAD 125 80 2 CHRISTOPHER J. & JOANN E. LAROCCO 469 GRAHAM ROAD 125 81 3 JUANITA D. BARNETT 477 GRAHAM ROAD 125 82 4 KEVIN & DANIELLE JERAM 485 GRAHAM ROAD 138 89 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN HALL 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WNDSOR, CT 06074 REMA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, LLC A 164 East Center Street,Suite 8 Manchester,CT 06040 (860)649-7362 (860)647-8397(fax) www.remaecological.com December 3, 2003 Fairfield County Office: 6 Anthes Avenue CT Alford Associates, Inc. Sandy Hook, 270-7167162 (203) 2 P.O.Box 484 (203)364-0338(fax) 200 Pigeon Hill Road Windsor, CT 06095 ATTN: Mr. Skip Alford RE: Site Investigation:Subdivision Parcel Nevers Road, South Windsor,Connecticut RES Job#03821 SWN55 Dear Mr. Alford: At your request on December 3rd, 2003, a Rema Ecological Services, LLC (REMA) soil scientist conducted a site visit at the above-referenced site. The purpose of the investigation was to verify the absence or the presence of regulated wetland areas in accordance with the State of Connecticut Statutes. The proposed development site is located to the west of Nevers Road. The study site is mainly forested with an existing residence along Nevers Road (southeast corner), a small agricultural filed in the southwestern portion of the study site and the remainder is forested uplands. The forested areas are a mix of hardwoods of varying ages and scattered evergreen trees. Evidence of logging was observed during the site visit, which results in a relatively open canopy (15 to 45%) and a dense understory. Typical vegetation encountered include, but are not limited to such species as oaks, hickory, white pine, black birch, hemlock,red maple, and beech in the tree canopy. Sassafras, gray birch,black birch,black cherry, scattered beech, Pennsylvania sedge,rattlesnake plantain,and ground pines dominate the understory. The soils on the subject site were derived from glacial outwash (i.e. stratified sand) deposits. No poorly or very poorly drained soils (i.e. regulated wetland areas) or watercourses were identified on the overall property or within 100 feet of the property boundaries. The soils in the undeveloped upland areas ranged from well drained to moderately well drained loamy soils. Please call us if you have any questions on the above or need further assistance. Respectfully submitted, REMA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES,LLC A,At James M.McManus,MS,CPSS Certified Professional Soil Scientist(No. 15226) VIA FAX&FIRST-CLASS MAIL G:\1 RES\2003JOBS\03821 SWN55-NeversRD\SiteReport_Subdivision.doc Soil&Wetland Studies 4 Ecology 4 Environmental Planning&Management • Permitting # Ecological Restoration&Habitat Mitigation 4 Expert Testimony 01/28/2004 15:13 8606478397 JP1MA ECOLOG PAGE 02 REMA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, LLC REPORT DATE: Januaro 22.2004 164 East Center Street,Suite 8 PAGE 1 OF 3 Manchester,CT PHONE: (864)649-7362 ON-SITE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT PROJECT NAME&SITE LOCATION: RES Job No.: OS&} 19 55 Pinged Development Property Field Investigation Date(s):-JI22104 Nevere Road Field Investigation Method(s):. 5ith Windsor,Cpnmecticur, ®Spade and Auger ❑Backhoe Test Pits ❑ Other: REPORT PREPARED FOR: Field Conditions: Alford Associates. Inc Weather: 5unt1y 30's 200 Pigeon Hill Road Soil Moisture: moderate Windsor,CT 00095 Snow Depth:_'3"1a,'3� Frost Depth: O"to > 12" Purpose of Investigation: Wetland Delineation/Flagging in Field ❑ Wetland Mapping on Sketch Plan or Topographic Plan ❑ High Intensity Soil Mapping by Soil Scientist ® Medium Intensity Soil Mapping from SCS Soil Survey Maps ❑ Other:- — Base Map Source: Hartford CounW Soil 5unM Wetland Boundary Marker Series: RE5-A-1 to RE5-A-b General Site Description/Comments: The r posew o itet r i pe Is located on the__�ay _s1dPLof Nevers Kasd,_She_oje1r,t area is forested with a f��i►cano and a den6e shru{�� r to The upland and wftland boils are,fd.n ffied_ _F_a_96 b isturbed soils t peace fr M 0 1et o+itwaoh(i.e..stratified sand,and grave()deppoi The soils identified as "tgi1and-t4pPa" 6�iL<�rp omnri end of��P, wf IL[dr�i��gt�y�raeCl 1 soil r5d Cr2, antd thd moderately well drafned Nfni - anil aeries•th v_ry p=ly�d 5carboro (,Oe) located in the wetter focatfons. The"reglllr�tPd��treAs"is ma d as a wooded swamp with seasonally flooded areas Tj*iral Ygatation observed was red maple, pin oako tupelo, epi_T aebush,hia&zuoh b_tueberry,arrowwooel.cinnamon fern-.oo_ i� son viol,and 6ddoe6. 01/�812004 15,13 8606478397 JMMA ECOLOG PAGE 03 0 PAGE 2 of 3 DATE: 111 ON-SITE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT(CONTINUED) PROJECT NAME&SITE LOCATION: Neve m load 5nuth W Jrinr.CT SOIL MAP UNITS Wetland Soils Walpole sandy loam (Wd). This series consists of deep, poorly drained soils formed in bandy water deposited glacial outwash materials. They are nearly level to gently sloping soils on glaciofluvial landforms,typically in shallow drainage ways and low-lying positions on stream terraces and outwash plains. The soils formed in loamy over stratified sandy and gravelly outwash derived from a variety of acid rocks. Typically, these soils have a very dark brown sandy loam surface layer 6 inches thick. The subsoil from 6 to 23 inches is mottled,grayish brown sandy loam. The substratum from 23 to 60 inches is mottled,light brownish gray,gravelly loamy sand and gravelly sand. 5carboro loam (5e). Thie.series consists of very deep,very poorly drained soils formed In sandy water deposited glacial outwash materials. They are nearly level soils on glaciofluvial landforms,typically In low depressions and drainage ways of outwash plains and terraces. The soils formed in a loamy sand lying over stratified sandy and gravelly outwash derived from a variety of acid rocks, Typically these soils have a 9 inch black mucky peat or very dark brown mucky sandy loamy surface layer. The subsurface layer from 9 to 16 inches is gray loamy sand. The substratum from 16 to 60 inches is olive gray, grayish brown and light yellowish brown loamy sand, loamy fine sand and coarse sand. The substratum may be stratified. Upland Soils Agawan sandy loam (Af). This series consists of deep,well-drained soils formed in a coarse-loamy mantle underlain by sandy water deposited glacial outwash materials. They are level to very steep soils on outwash plains and high stream terraces. The soils formed in loamy over stratified sandy and gravelly glacial outwash derived mainly from crystalline rocks. Typically these Soils have a dark grayish brown fine sandy loam surface layer 11 inches thick. The subsoil from 11 to 26 inches is dark yellowish brown and light olive brown Tine sandy loam.The substratum from 26 to 55 inches is olive and olive brown loamy fine sand.below 55 Inches It is stratified fine sand to gravelly loamy sand. Ninlgret fine sandy loam (Nn). This series consists of very deep moderately well drained soils formed in a coarse-loamy mantle underlain by sandy water deposited glacial outwash materials. They are nearly level to gently sloping soils on glaclofiuvial landforms, typically in slight depressions and broad drainage ways. The soils formed in loamy over stratified sandy and gravelly outwash derived from a variety of acid rocks. Typically, these soils have a very dark grayish brown fine sandy loam surface layer 8 inches thick. The subsoil from 8 to 26 inches is yellowish brown fine sandy loam with mottles below 16 inches. The substratum from 26 to 60 inches is mottled, pale brown, loose, stratified loamy sand. Mom] NeversRddoc 01/ 8/2004 15:13 8606478397 JMMA ECOLOG PAGE 04 PAGE 3 OF 3 DATE: 112710 ON-SITE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT (CONTINUED) PROJECT NAME& SITE LOCATION: R&vfrf2 Road mouth Witldkar, CT :+ SOIL MAP UNITS See other page Any accompanying soil logs and soil maps, and the on-site soil investigation narrative are in accordance with the taxonomic classification of the National Cooperative Soil Survey of the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, and with the Connecticut Soil Legend (DEP Bulletin No.5, 1983). Jurisdictional wetland boundaries were delineated pursuant to the Connecticut General Statutes (CGS Sections 22a-36 to 22a-45), as amended. The site investigation was conducted and/or reviewed by the undersigned Registered Soil Scientist(s)[registered with the Society of Soil Scientists of Southern New England (SSSSNE).in accordance with the standards of the Federal Office of Personnel Management]. Respectfully submitted, RB>vtA fiCOI.oa1CA1..SEttVICES,LLC George T.Logan,MS,CPWS James M.McManus,MS,CPSS Registered Soil Scientist Certified Professional Soil Scientist Senior Reviewer Field Investigator 1iRemal4 iresl2003JOBS103821SWNSS-NeversRDIsoilreporL]VeversRd.doc .s View of watercourse from Riverside Drive View of culverts under Riverside Drive. No flow at the date of photo. 2-20-04 i 4 i? A l View of watercourse from culverts—south toward View of watercourse midway to pond—south. pond. No flow at date of photo. 2-20-04 Water present on this reach. 2-20-04 Ma Nil Mature tree at north end of pond—note water View of pond south from the northern end level in relation to the trunk of the tree t z QONI� CI�CUT DP, TIS�1`T O � � �� 3x a F. ENV�RQT4M__Ntk _PRQ'I`S,6,T1 N 018;QODE# � ora;cT Q4 Of 120wy �T FED -� 3 2004 Arthgz J : oue;Jf CarY �SSioner youth Windsor t 1Nt At O wtTLAI AGEj 1CY 1 'LION C117htISb1ON WAVIA won COI tSERVP �S NOV to �Yv a tn� yid:W� l r� s & WAtgregurses }��'� o�-� i Pis�se c�tnp(ete this four!`in accdtdEinc `yri h the lns rt ctloits Ilea e p ent pY t 3 x� y' a f_omaRlatedBy The li ekhd 1( tl rods�1�etn�y DATA ACTIN .WA8 TAKEN^ `Yqq ear o th �� UO, ,�} s M rt _ x -AQ100N,�A�ENL a 3 v - rem t 3 i1NAS A"RUBL�C HERiN( HELD Yes _' No ,= ` PSM A. N MIr 4F�1C NCY Q FICIP.L\IE�IFYY ANC C�IUIRLE7ING TH S FO M ri t Foals ;y lisp r 0 00, 1 T� Der: Arhf) edlB Tk,l� Ir�J �V1l t�allds dgenc�Qr'7`!�e le nt , 1'QIN jl WMlH THE, TIt�N IS OCCUiINC pS . ��fl�z Qs t111 pi o�ec �bsrrlyniclpal bo�lydaraev� Yss t (Vo d r RENT! :'kta a s k 1 k 1'sSz I SM the pt[�er<tgWur1(;)`rn whi0h the acts 1 9cpy rt g r 3 _ s �.=�� 0 1'IQN C�S�S°Q I a § �` d 4 bsr WAIN "Uo�Y g,16' I Dr m �Rash Nupibe) `TMo,�� p: Y h x l/ WOO 7 NA 11Ea F/Rp?L(CANT VfiOLATQR 6 A ILLS i R �G ` C� M' , ��. 1`0 3t � I�GIUI>� 1D1S �LQC�TIQN_ F � t� Ogge06.0, the e�bbnlproject/aotlYiMAST OF ty A��'IVI`TY�pt/,'PQS'<�'CQQE ¢ '�}; r s � r 2 l' s' .e - '` i } [VITY �E COpas i 1TLAND/V�IATlCpURS /�R i4LTrifD[rnus#be prQvjded 1ne�`es Qt liar feet indt� ts � E , t � a �g , e)I acres Qper 1Natf Body Q_ _acres (!hear feet d k S g }YA, A�Fr t IANc#.AR IL,fiEE ED[rha�f be Orpvrded!n r S`aS itic)! t d Y' '' �,{ � � �� WOO �GC�S yam. x [e t. �'r s y g � c§ •" r �' s t ai F s.t c F t r Ft 1 { Q W 1`tAND A /oR�WAT f G UI S S RL �h RIsD;1 NHANGED'C�Rt��2E��rr�>5; O.r � c e � you 1 4 a,4k bePOvli� d ��5 I77, n �`dtGtd' '" ; £ '_y a t 8" �`r � - ��z. �_� _ �`c'3"�3•_: ,. s �.�'' �it .s rc��r--.Fib..,, �,4.k1F ,_t�'s�..x b r•�.= � �` }s�x Y S Y s � ysrow'• 1 to qwj� �k 1 ik t R t$ 4 ,.. sue. - .,...:.�.. _ t.,__.• ..3i..:» .......... R_;AW ■ WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&LS. ' ■ WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&LS. ENGINEERS AV SURVEYORS ■ CHRISTIAN L ALFORD,P.E.&L.S. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD ■ P.O.BOX 484 0 WINDSOR N CT 06M ■ PHONE(860)668-7288 E FAX(860)688-3485 2 ALFORD@SNET.NET February 2, 2004 FEB 3 2004 Property Owner (Certified Mail) Re: Proposed "Joseph Lane Estates"- Subdivision Joseph Lane & 585± Nevers Road, South Windsor, CT Applicant- Mannarino Builders, Inc. Owner- David Patria Dear Property Owner: In accordance with Section 7.313 of the "Town of South Windsor Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations" and in accordance with Section 3.20 of the "South Windsor Zoning Regulations", we are required to notify you that applications have been filed on the property abutting yours or within 500 feet and are subject to hearings by the Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. As an abutting property owner, you are invited to the hearings to ask questions and/or give comments, however you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this will be heard, please contact the Planning Department or Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer at 644-2511, ext, 252 or 229. Thank you. Very truly yours, ' / �U( -v C Wilson M. Alford, Jr. Alford Associates, Inc. 1 ' 1 1 - . . . hlu / 1: / r r r r - rrr r l r ma w mm ALFORD ASSOCIATES,INC. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS s AREA DESIGN DISCHARGE PIPE PIPE PIPE VELOWY CB/M.H GROSS AREA "C" C*A Tc "I" YEAR "Q" SIZE PIPE PIPE LENGTH cAPACrry FULL TO INC. TOT INC TOT INC TOT IN/HR STORA CFS INCHES TYPE SLOPE (FEET) CFS FT/SEC N YD 6 0,251 0.25 0.33 0.08 0.08 20 20 3.40: 10 0.28 TO 10.00 HI-0 1.90 135.00 3.92 7.18 0.010 CBS Y 5 0,251 0.25 0,39 0.10 0.10 20 20 3,40, 101 0.33 TO I I 1 10.00 HI-Q 4. 0 21.00 5.68 10.42 0.010 CB 5 0,581 1.08 0,51 0.30 0.48 20 20 3.4 -701 1.62 TO 1 15.0 HIZ 1,05 24,00 8.39 6,83, 0.010 7134 0,631 1.71 0.48 0.30 0.78 20 20 '140, 10 2.64 TO 15,00 H- 1.60 213.00 10.61 8.65 0,010 B2 YD 3 0,19 0.19 0,46 0.09 0.09 20 20 4 10 0.30 TO 10.0 HI-Q 1,00 25.00 2.84 5,21 0,010 CB 3 0.78 1.21 0,62 0.48 0.67 20 20 3,40I 10 2.26 TO 15.00 I-Q 1.00 22,00 8.39 6,83 0.010 CB 2 72 3.64 0.55 0.39 1.84 0 20 3.40 10 6.25 TO 15.00 HI-Q 1,2 10 .00 9.38 7.64 0.010 CB 1 D 4 0,241 0.24 0.39 0.09 0.09 20 20 3.40 10 0.32 TO 10.00 HI- 1,001 162.00 2.84 5.21 0.010 CB 3 MANNARINO-01-04-DRAINAGE-JOSEPH,LANE 1/2212004 YD#6 INCREASE RATE JOSEPH LANE 22-Jan-04 AREA= 9. 67 ACRES EXISTING C= 0.20 OVERLAND FLOW 960 FEET TOP ELEV 181 BOT ELEV 138 DROP 43 SLOPE 4 . 48% TIME = 20 MINUTES Tc= 20 MINUTESI100= 5 EXISTING FLOW= A*C 9. 67 CFS AFTER DEVELOPMENT BY-PASS AREA= 3.58 C= 0.322 I= 5 Q= 5.77 CFS FROM BASIN 3.20 CFS TOTAL AFTER DEV 8. 97 CFS EXISTING FLOW 9.67 CFS INCREASE -0.70 CFS C -7.3% MANNARINO-01-04-DRAINAGE-JOSEPH LANE MANNARINO-01-04-DRAINAGE-JOSEPH LANE 1/22/2004 JOSEPH LANE 22-Jan-04 DETENTION BASIN HEAD IN FEET ABOVE FLOW LINE ELEV FLOW LINE OU 182.1 FLOW OUT IN CFS 10 "PIPE HEAD FLOW OUT ELEV. AREA OF CONTOUR VOLUME BELOW CO 0 0.0 182.1 0 0 1.05 1.0 183 4521 1356 1.72 2.0 184 5683 6447 3.86 4.0 185 6956 12756 5.33 5.0 187 9660 29289 7.07 6.0 187.2 9883 31242 YEAR NTENSI MAX IN vlAX OUI MAX EL. DRAINAGE AREA= 6.04 100 5.0 13.41 3.20 185.20 RUNOFF COEFF= 0.44 50 4.6 12.34 3.00 185.00 TIME OF CONCENTF 20 25 4.1 11.00 3.00 184.90 INTENSITY= 5 10 3.4 9.12 2.60 184.WIANALYSIS FOR 100 YEAR STO 2 2.2 5.90 2.00 183.90 PEAK FLOW IN= 13.4 INTENSI 5 100 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0 0 0 161 0.1 0.0 182.2 4 2.7 322 0 322 0.2 0.1 182.3 8 5.4 1288 24 1264 0.8 0.7 182.9 12 8.0 2897 192 2705 1.1 1.0 183.2 16 10.7 5150. 432 4718 1.5 1.6 183.6 20 13.4 8047 816 7231 2.0 2.2 184.1 24 11.8 11077 1344 9733 2.4 2.6 184.5 28 10.3 13728 1068 11760 2.7 2.8 184.8 32 8.7 16001 2640 13361 2.9 3.0 186.0 36 7.1 17895 3360 14535 3.1 3.2 185.2 40 5.5 19410 4128 15282 3.1 3.2 185.2 44 3.9 20547 4896 15651 3.1 3.2 185.2 48 2.4 21306 5664 15642 3.1 3.2 185.2 52 0.8 21685 6432 15253 3.1 3.2 185.2 56 0.0 21781 7200 14581 3.1 3.2 185.2 60 0.0 21781 7968 13813 2.9 3.0 185.0 64 0 21781 8688 13093 2.9 3.0 185.0 68 0 21781 9408 12373 2.8 3.0 184.9 72 0 21781 10128 11653 2.7 2.8 184.8 76 0 21781 10800 10981 2.6 2.8 184.7 80 0 21781 11472 10309 2.5 2.6 184.6 84 0 21781 12096 9685 2.4 2.6 184.5 88 0 21781 1272-0 9061 2.3 2.4 184.4 92 0 21781 13296 8485 2.2 2.4 184.3 96 0 21781 13872 7909 2.1 2.2 184.2 100 0 21781 14400 7381 2.0 2.2 184.1 104 0 21781 14928 6853 1.9 2.0 184.0 108 0 21781 15408 6373 1.8 2.0 183.9 112 0 21781 15888 5893 1.7 1.9 183.8 116 0 21781 16344 5437 1.7 1.9 183.8 1201 0 21781 16800 4981 1.6 1.8 183.7 124 1 0 21781 17232 4549 1.51 1.61 183.6 MEMORANDUM To: Jeffrey Doolittle, Town Engineer Cc: Marcia Banach, Dir. of Planning From: Jeffrey Folger, Environmental Planner Date: January 20, 2004 Re: Storage issues in Wood Pond I have examined Town aerial photos from 1946, 1956, 1966, 1986, and 1996 that show Wood Pond in various stages of evolution. The 1946 air photo shows the and in an advanced state of eutrofication. p p Heavy surface vegetation including woody shrubs and herbaceous plants are clearly evident and covering over 95% of the surface of the pond. The contributing watershed is at least 50% wooded with a forested area of at least 300 feet surrounding the pond. The forest vegetation would buffer adjacent agricultural impacts (nutrients). The 1956 air photo shows the pond with almost 100% open water with no discernable bottom. This could mean that between 1946 and 1956 either the pond bottom was altered, or the water level was increased. There is no discernable land scarring that would indicate that a dredging operation had taken place. The sand mining operation to the north required an access road to be built with a culvert. It is possible that the level of the culvert was raised over time causing the water elevation in the pond to increase. The 1966 air photo still shows an open water situation. The 1986 air photo shows the pond with the addition of the Wood Pond residential subdivision as well as Wood Pond Road to the south rand Riverside Drive to the north. Woody vegetation has started to encroach into the open water area from the south and around the edges. I would estimate that 20% of the open water area has been encroached upon. The 1996 air photo shows a significant increase of vegetation in the pond. The open water area has been reduced. I would estimate that 40% of the open water area has been encroached upon. There are no man-made structures present that effects the outflow of water from the pond. The channel that drains the pond to the north is in good shape with a sand and gravel bottom. There is no indication that the channel has been degraded by sediment. Wood Pond appears to be in a state of eutrophication and over time is evolving back into a swamp. Urban inputs from the adjacent residential developments within the watershed will accelerate the process. The neighbors have mentioned that there has been a rise in the water level of the pond. Mature trees at the northern end of the pond are inundated to a height of 1-foot plus. This certainly seems reasonable if the pond is becoming shallower due to a buildup of organics and sediments on the bottom. This would also result in a reduction of available storage during storm events. a WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. ■ WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. fENGINEERS a SURVEYORS ■ CHRISTIAN L ALFORD,P.E.&LS. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD N P.O.BOX 484 E WINDSOR I CT 06095 1 PHONE(860)688-TM I FAX(860)888-3M I ALFORD@SNET.NET (RECEIVED February 2, 2004 FFg - 5.2004 Property Owner SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, (Certified Mail) Re: Proposed "Joseph Lane Estates"- Subdivision Joseph Lane & 585± Nevers Road, South Windsor, CT Applicant- Mannarino Builders, Inc. Owner- David Patria Dear Property Owner: In accordance with Section 7.3B of the "Town of South Windsor Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations" and in accordance with Section 3.20 of the "South Windsor Zoning Regulations", we are required to notify you that applications have been filed on the property abutting yours or within 500 feet and are subject to hearings by the Inland Wetlands Agency / Conservation Commission and.the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applications.and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department. As an abutting property owner, you are invited to the hearings to ask questions and/or give comments, however you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application prior to hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this will be heard, please contact the Planning Department or Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer at 644-2511, ext. 252 or 229. Thank you. Very truly yours, KJU -v C Wilson M. Alford, Jr. Alford Associates, Inc. q O•HN Sf4 o m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 To: Alford Associates Windsor, CT 06095 From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: February 6, 2004 Re: App. #04-06P -Review of the proposed Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision—Plans dated 01/30/04. I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following initial comments: The location of soil stockpiles should be shown. Appropriate erosion control measures should be placed so to minimize sediment migration. Siltfence should be placed along the front of all of the proposed lots to minimize sediment migration onto the road, and limit access to the lots by equipment and workers. Stormwater is proposed to be discharged onto the open space property to the east of Nevers Road. This area contains inland wetlands. The plan does not show contours sufficient to determine the direction or impacts of runoff from the project. The construction of the detention basin should be accomplished during phase I. This will insure the proper and timely establishment of the structure prior to the larger scale land clearing associated with Phase IL A detail of the detention basin outlet structure should be provided. A detail showing the proposed catchbasin protection should be provided. Norway maple is considered an invasive tree species by the DEP. A native tree species should be substituted as a street tree alternative. cc. Mannarino Builders Town Engineer Director of Planning IWA/CC SO*IN Sf4 C Wo� 0-pslou� ?d&U&Ot O m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 tidSOR Co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 To: Alford Associates Windsor, CT 06095 From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: February 10, 2004 Re:.App. #04-06P -Review of the proposed Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision—Plans dated 01/30/04. ' I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following additional comments: The existing contour lines on sheets 4 and 5 are too faint to discern in relation to proposed grading and structures. These should be more distinct on any future revisions. CC. Mannarino Builders Town Engineer Director of Planning IWA/CC -MEMORANDUM To: South Windsor Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission. From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: February 10, 2004 Re: App. #04-06P—Joseph Lane Estates subdivision-Plans dated 01/30/04. The project is to build a 15-lot residential subdivision,road, and stormwater structures on 9.44 acres. Regulated activities include the location of a stormwater outlet within the URA. Estimated disturbance in the URA is 435 sgft. Site: The site is located in the Podunk River watershed. The parcel is wooded and moderately sloping to the east toward Nevers Road. The eastern 2/3 of the site gently slopes down to the north and west. The site is primarily wooded with hardwoods (oak,hickory,maple)being the dominant overstory trees. The understory vegetation is moderate, as is the forest floor. This parcel abuts a non- developed parcel to the south, which is actively farmed. Based on the proposed plans,the forested area on the site would be cleared to accommodate the development. A stormwater outlet from a proposed detention basin would discharge to a small wetland area that exists between Wood Pond and Nevers Road. The wetland area drains to the north into Wood Pond. The wetland area would be classified as a forested wetland type. Road runoff currently drains to the wetland. Functions of this wetland would be stormwater retention, nutrient and sediment trapping, flood storage, groundwater recharge, and wildlife habitat. The site drains to Wood Pond to the east. This open space area contains a pond and wetland. The pond contains emergent woody vegetation, and while there is evidence of eutrofication(in- filling of open water areas by vegetation),the area has important wildlife, stormwater retention, flood storage, nutrient and sediment assimilation, and groundwater recharge functions. Impacts: The soils on the site are listed primarily as Enfield Silt Loam(EsB) 3 to 8% slopes and Narragansett Silt Loam(NaB) 3 to 8% slopes by the Hartford County Soil Survey. These soils have erosion potentials listed as high. Planned erosion controls should be adequate to contain migrating sediments generated by construction activities. Stormwater quality is proposed to be addressed by the installation of a dry retention basin.. Catch basins planned show 4-foot sumps. Water quality renovation concerns should be addressed by the current design. There is a concern about the effect the discharge will have when it reaches the eastside of Nevers Road. This small wetland drains to the north, eventually emptying into Wood Pond. The topography associated with the wetland is very flat, and care needs to be taken to insure that discharged stormwater flows to the north and does not negatively impact the adjacent residence to the south. Additionally, the increase in volume generated by the development could negatively impact the neighbors adjacent to Wood Pond itself. The Wood Pond impoundment area appears to be changing over time. Sequential aerial photographs from the 1940's through the 1990's suggests that Wood Pond has become shallower, and is less suited to handle stormwater flows than was originally conceived when the Wood Pond subdivision was approved in the early 1980's. The overall storage capacity has been reduced and the water level has been raised during periods of high flow or increased groundwater levels. The present water level is 12-15"high on existing mature trees located at the north end of the pond. Clearly, these trees grew and thrived in a situation where the water level was quite lower. I have measured the depth of the pond at several places along its length. The greatest depth observed was 32"in the center with shallower depths to the north and south. A possible solution to the changing situation there would be to dredge out the man-made drainage ditch that exits from the pond and travels north under Riverside Drive. This would result in lowering the water level in the pond,providing additional storage in the pond and lessening the existing impact to neighboring properties whose yards are becoming increasingly saturated. The applicant is willing to perform this task and include the proposed work as a part of the application. We have instructed the applicant to examine the elevations of the watercourse at the pond, and at the culverts that pass under Riverside Drive to see if it is feasible to consider that option. SOWN Sf4 T-0� �s-ate 7&01� O m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 sox•co� AREA CODE 860/644-251 1 To: Alford Associates Windsor, CT 06095 From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: February 10, 2004 Re: App.404-06P -Review of the proposed Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision—Plans dated 01/30/04. I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following additional comments: The existing contour lines on sheets 4 and 5 are too faint to discern in relation to proposed grading and structures. These should be more distinct on any future revisions. The slope seeding mix should be changed to include crown vetch due to its aggressive, deep root system. Please substitute the crown vetch for the creeping red fescue. CC. Mannarino Builders Town Engineer Director of Planning IWA/CC MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Cc: Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer r- Date: 3/1/04 RE: App 04-06P, Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision Application I have reviewed the Site Plan for a the Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision and have the following comments: 1. The slopes around the houses should be less than 4H:1 V so they can be used and maintained as lawn area. 2. Extend the sidewalks around both sides of the proposed cul-de-sac on Joseph so they connect. 3. Move the main drainage pipe (from CB4 to C131)to the west side of the road so the yard drains on this side can discharge directly into CB's or the drain pipe. This will eliminate the long collector drains along the road that would have to be privately maintained. 4. Two additional catch basins are required in the cul-de-sac. These should be placed at the tangent of the reverse curves going into the cul-de-sac as shown on the plans, (just up hill of the driveways for lots 6 and 7). 5. The drainage easement between lots 13 and 14 is too close to the houses. It will be very difficult to maintain this pipe and access the detention basin without impacting the houses where they are shown. These houses each need to be located at least 10 feet away from the drainage easement or this easement should be 30 feet wide. If the drainage easement is kept at 20 feet a note needs to be included on the plot plan and building plan that no structure or portion thereof shall be (coated within 10 feet of this easement. The pipe needs to be centered in the easement by the road. 6. Show a standard 10 foot wide Town Gravel Access Road (4" topsoil over 8" gravel over filter fabric)from the paved roads to the detention basin within both the easement area to the inlet and outlet structure. Include a note on the plot plan and building plan that there shall not be any utility structures (other than for stormwater drainage), driveways, structures, fences, or trees, within the drainage easements. 7. Increase the size of the level spreader across the road to about 50 feet long to better disperse the flow from this development. 8. A gutter flow analysis and headwater analysis need to be completed and submitted as part of the drainage report for this subdivsion. 9. The developer has agreed to clean-out the outlet channel from the north end of the pond to the culverts crossing Riverside Drive. This will maintain the flow from the pond and may increase the outlet flow. It may also lower the water level in the pond a few inches depending on the groundwater flow in the area. The details of this plan need to be finalized between the developer and the Town Engineer and Environmental Planner in the spring or summer of this year. The Town requests that the developer clean the outlet channel during the first low flow period after construction begins on either Joseph Lane Estates or Eagle Run SRD. 10. Add a note specifying galvanized frames and grates for the catch basins and detention basin outlet structure top grate and trash rack. 11. On Sheet 8, notes 14 and 30 appear to be the same. One can be deleted. 12. WPCA review and approval is required for this site. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions. MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning RECLZ11/eD Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Michael Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works MAR 2 2004 MLq SOUth�/�(jndSOf From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer CONSER 4r04No AGENCY Date: 3/2/04 MM'SS'ON RE: Wood Pond outlet by Riverside Drive I inspected the outlet from Wood Pond and the culverts crossing Riverside Drive today. The ice is beginning to soften and break up. I estimate that the water elevation in the pond has dropped about 8"-12" since the winter based on the top of ice and the visible water. No water was flowing out from the pond. There is a high point in the bottom of the outlet channel mid way between the culverts and the pond that is about 6"-8" above the water level in the pond. There were also two logs down across the mouth of the outlet channel near the pond. It appears that the high point in the channel and the logs across the mouth of the channel have held back the water in the pond and caused the water level in the pond to be high for extended periods this past fall and winter. Cleaning out the channel will be beneficial as the water will keep flowing from the pond and the water in the pond should not remain high for as long after storms as it recently has. We should continue to work with Rob Mannarino to clean out this channel as he has agreed to do as part of the Joseph Lane Estates and Eagle Run projects. I also looked at the two culverts that cross Riverside Drive. A small trickle of water was flowing into the eastern culvert that has the lower invert elevation. Water from the road was flowing into the western culvert via the catch basins in the road. There was about 2"-3" of silt in the inlet to the culverts. No water was flowing out of either culvert. There was ice and about 8" of silt in the culvert outlets. It looked like the western culvert may be obstructed by ice or some other debris. There was also a lot of silt and debris (fallen branches, leaves, rip rap, silt) downstream of the culvert outlets. recommend the Town plan on cleaning out these culverts and the outlet area. The Town owns the property to the north of Riverside Drive along Nevers Road. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions. o �� 8a 'uPc�n�q KevictiPk 6006S J00 ( ,,o` tosjo rB�oGIGf�Q,� G�t/�G �PkE.�o , 0,00 7 qG, ourieT 4- Ui✓G c Poo G� Aooe ac. C�1/EG �PQem6-J Tarim G 0 4' o�l5 0 I I I 179.53 I I / I / 00 / w 8p, +I 7�02 <qN0 l S'FL A-1 176.4 I I F,q I � 17a.sz IPE=176t 178.7 � t 177.9 '4 I +/ 178.73 A-2 EMST. CB h 176.4 I ! iF= 178.95 1 05 17968 FL, W= 175.25 i 82. 0+!180. -1 8.78 FL, E= 177.25 3 7 95 Q 183.2 1$0.18 7D.ID; jt:�7 1277.E \+'i82.4 I I Mf7A wg. / f EXIST.77.44 OUTLET CIA-3 181 5 I ! 1 .52 FL=177.07 176.5 i EDGE OF WETLANDS WERE FLA ^ t M SOIL SCIEN77ST, FROM REMA E I t 177.9 +177.1 +176.3 r 83.3 I ^ ;o., ON JANUARY 22, 2004 I3 A_4 FLAGS WERE FIELD LOCATED E I t 176.5 S=171.2 I M¢ +177.5 ' A-5 N------ h a ro_, 176.5+176.4 +6 m 1 11 N + I I +176.7 180.5 j100 _ EXIST. SAN. MH TF= 180.80 1176.5 7.4 1" FL= 171.30 180.5 00 + `° I' +176.6 _ d ' 176.6 PROPOSED FLARED END #2 FL= 177.5 1 +176.9 1 WPTH RIP-RAP PLUNGE POOL i I PROPOSED CB #6 ` Bl0nL7ER AREA= 177.0 1 TF a 180.5 LEVEL SPREADER, TOP= 177.5 _ I PROPOSED STORM PIPE UNDER + A-8 EXIST. SAN. I � �� ROADWAY SHALL BE 176.3 } 176.3 _ATERAL 15 0 CLASS V RCP 00 , 100 1 �� +ns.s N/F DOUGL,, I ( 178.6 (01 FL 175.42 Fl.= .: 174.32 W a Q + 184.09 LAJ C� O +g C� � M W � W fakA ce- FL= FL= TIAf 174.99 SUBSOIL STOCKPILE TOP OF ICE 176.0 TEMPORARY TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AREA TO BE REGRADED TO TOP OF ICE PROVIDE POSITIVE 176.3 GRADE TOWARDS CULVERT PIPES BOTTOM OF WATER 175.0 TOP OF ICE + 178.5 , 176.4.4+ 180.5 s 176.1 1 176.6+ +176.4 -h 175.8. BOTTOM OF WATER=174 6 176.7 " <TOP OF ICE , + +175.8 (( nn 179:2 TOP OF ICE Li TOP OF ICE + 175.6 W , z 182.06. - S0.N N Sfq O-P Souk/ V ?Ah� a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR-CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 March 17, 2004 Certified 70020510000081151478# Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Appl.#04-06P—Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision—Joseph Lane,A-20 Residential zone Dear Mr. Mannarino: At the March 3, 2004 regular meeting,the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved application#04-06P—Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision—Joseph Lane—Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission application for the construction of a 15-lot residential subdivision on 9.4 acres,road, stormwater structures, and associated improvements on property located westerly of Nevers Road, and southerly of Joseph Lane. A-20 zone. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon,must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning&Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability,which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on March 3, 2009. It is the landowners)/applicant(s)responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 4. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 5. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. 6. We recommend a bond in the amount of$15,000 be submitted to the Planning&Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the erosion and sediment control measures. Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision March 17,2004 Page 2 7. We recommend a bond in the amount of$5,000 be submitted to the Planning&Zoning Commission to ensure the establishment of the stormwater structures. 8. Any work performed on the outflow channel is to be approved by the Town Engineer 9. Language to be included in the easement should prevent alteration of the basin or deposition of debris into the basin. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION ZWarren, Elizab Chairperson Elizab EW:dr cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Alford Associates, Inc. OE MEMORANDUM MAR 2 3 2004 To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning _7t ..LC ot1 Cc: Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer '"`A 'D ATIO rt°M AGENCY wISSIO CON''FkVAI ION CUMh,IS510N From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer 9-ef Date: 3/23/04 RE: App 04-06P, Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision Application I have reviewed the Site Plan for a the Joseph Lane Estates Subdivision and have the following comments: 1. A strip along the front of this property on Nevers Road needs to be deeded to the Town of South Windsor to provide 25 feet of ROW from the centerline of the existing road. (approx. 8 feet wide). The setback lines and houses on these lots need to be adjusted to this new ROW line. 2. The slopes around the houses should be no steeper than 4H:1 V so they can be used and maintained as lawn area. 3. 1 think the sidewalks should be extended around both sides of the proposed cul-de-sac on Joseph Lane so they connect. This is how the sidewalks are on the approved plans for the Vintage Hills Subdivision. If this is not done the sidewalk should cross the driveways for Lots 5 and 7 and end in a ramp heading south to the street. A note and/or lines needs to be shown on the plan indicating a future sidewalk across lots 6&7. 4. The developer has agreed to clean-out the outlet channel from the north end of the pond to the culverts crossing Riverside Drive. This will maintain the flow from the pond and may increase the outlet flow. It may also lower the water level in the pond a few inches depending on the groundwater flow in the area. The details of this plan need to be finalized between the developer and the Town Engineer and Environmental Planner in the spring or summer of this year. The Town requests that the developer clean the outlet channel during the first low flow period after construction begins on either Joseph Lane Estates or Eagle Run SRD. 5. A gutter flow analysis and headwater analysis need to be completed and submitted as part of the drainage report for this subdivsion. 6. The proposed foundation drains from the houses on lots 13 and 14 on Nevers Road need to be revised and detailed as follows: Raise and specify the invert elevation so these connect into the top of the 15" drainage pipe between the houses. Include a detail for the connection of these foundation drains into the 15"drainage pipe. Backwater valves are required on these foundation drains to prevent water from backing up into these houses. The backwater valves should be located at or in the houses and be accessible for maintenance. 7. The proposed foundation drain from the house on Lot 15 on Nevers Road needs to be moved back onto private property so it does not run parallel to the road within the ROW. This is a private drain that should cross lot 14 and then connect into the storm drainage pipe with the same detail as is used for the foundation drains from lots 13 and 14. 8. All the proposed driveways need to be graded with a maximum slope of 5%for 10 foot back from the ROW line according to the Town Standard Details. The driveways for Lots 4, 5, 6 and 13 are not graded this way. Grading is not shown on the driveway for lot 14. The steep driveways for lots 4, 5, 6, 13, 14 and any others (greater than 4-5%) need to be sloped to the side so surface water sheds off the driveway onto the more pervious side area before it reaches the road. 9. WPCA review and approval is required for this site. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions.