Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-83P Berry Patch II Spec Ex/Site Plan
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING& ZONING COMMI"M, J APPLICATION FORM Application No: b3-ue NOV - 4 2003 Official Receipt Date: ,l d ;OU T N V,'INDS'OR PLAT 1,,!G XPT. Receipt No: APPLICANT: The South Windsor Housing Authority; and The Metro Realty Group, LTD, c/o Geoffrey Sager, President PROJECT NAME: Berry Patch 11 ADDRESS: 1540 Sullivan Ave, South Windsor, CT 06074; 6 Executive Dr, Farmington, CT 06032 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Fred S. Katten; Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God ADDRESS: 115 Beverly Rd, W. Hartford, CT 06119; 400 Buckland Rd, South Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 400 Buckland Rd & R020 Buckland Road i ASSESSOR'S MAP# 51, 38 PARCEL# 32, ZONE AA-30 & GD FP eM NAME,ADDRESS, TEL&FAX# OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc., 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT, 06074, Tel: 291-8755, Fax: 291-8757 �� S THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): Cal vr. Cftc�c, c� 33 , � �9ssei 6(rcjs of hod ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Re subdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision(Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval 4.1.11 and Special Exception to Article __Z.1 .2.4 (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) ❑✓ Site Plan of Development (Housing for the Elderly/ Flood Plain) ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑✓ Other (explain in detail) Waiver to allow up to 196 units at Berry patch II and Berry Patch (formerly Berry Farm) ; and approval under CGS Section. 8-30g affordable housing. An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. Sig ature of Ap lic t Signature of Property Owne 1�11 - -,� 4-1-�, /0/1 HA R D E C _ / State of C necticut Departme of Ec nomic and September 26,2003 Communi $ev ® t Tows,! _S Re: 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List Dear Chief Elected Official: I am contacting you regarding the assistance the Department of Economic and Community Development(DECD)will require from your municipality in publishing Connecticut's 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List. As you know,according to Section 8-30g of the Connecticut General Statutes,the Commissioner of DECD is legislatively mandated to"promulgate,annually,a list containing each municipality in the state and identifying those municipalities in which at least ten percent(10%)of all dwelling units in the municipality are: 1)governmentally assisted;2)currently financed by CHFA or 3)subject to deed restrictions to ensure long-term affordability." DECD has a comprehensive database that includes all assisted housing units in the state,listed by town. Every year we go through the process of updating that list to ensure accuracy of our database. Once again,we need the assistance of your municipality in order to complete that process. We require the following information from you: a listing of any housing unit that was newly deed-restricted to be affordable in accordance with P.A.02-87,subsection(k),parts(3)and(4). A copy is attached. We require a copy of any new deeds that apply. Please fill in the enclosed form entitled"Annual Report of New Deed- Restricted Housing"and enclose a copy of any such deed(s)with all appropriate deed-restriction language and time period clearly highlighted. We hope to publish the list early in 2004. The information we require should be available from your town clerk's office. It may also be helpful to work with your town planner and your local housing authority in order to obtain up-to- date information from them.As we have to gather information from a variety of sources,review the data,do any "clean-up"research and then compile the list,we are asking those who must assist us to meet a deadline of submitting their information by November 1,2003. Please send the information from your municipality to the following contact: Jeri Fazzalaro,Planning Specialist Compliance Office and Planning/Program Support Department of Economic and Community Development 505 Hudson Street Hartford,CT 06106 PLEASE NOTE: There are three(3)attachments to this memorandum that may be helpful to you including: 1)an attachment that contains copies of three(3)listings of the affordable housing in your municipality that we counted for the 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List;2)a copy of wording from P.A.02-87,effective October 1,2002, concerning mobile-manufactured homes and accessory apartments and 3)a listing of the FY 2003 median family income for each PMSA/MSA. All of this information will be helpful to you in reviewing your town's affordable housing numbers. Please check these materials carefully and contact us if there are discrepancies. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions,please contact me at 860-270-8164 or Geraldine.Fazzalarona po.state.ct.us. Sincerely, Jeri Fazzalaro,Planning Specialist Compliance Office and Planning/program Support JF 505 Hudson Street,Hartford,Connecticu'e 06106-7106 An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer An Equal Opportunity Lender DECD Letter Re:2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List Attachment#1: Attached are copies of listings that comprise the entire count for your municipality from the 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals list. There are three(3)lists that include information from all the sources we are required to use in drawing up the annual list including: 1. The Assisted Housing List Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List contains the following data: • DECD's Construction Activity Information System • Connecticut Department of Social Services' Rental Assistance Program • FmHA-funded single and multi-family dwellings • HUD-funded new or substantially rehabilitated properties as well as data from their rental assistance program. 2. The Deed-Restricted Properties Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List contains: • A listing of all properties in your municipality which are currently shown as deed-restricted and, thus,eligible to be counted towards the 10%requirement for affordable housing. Please note that there may be property shown on this enclosed list for which the deed-restriction(s)are expiring and that means the property will be removed when we compile the 2003 list. Please check these properties carefully and make sure we have the appropriate time period listed under the "restriction duration"column. IF there are discrepancies,please enclose a copy of the deed in question with the time period for restrictions clearly highlighted so that we can correct our list,if necessary. 3. The CHFA Mortgages Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List shows you the number of CHFA mortgages currently financed in your community for the 2002 time period. We will be getting data on the number of such mortgages for your community for this year's appropriate time period,October 1,2002 through September 30,2003,directly from CHFA. We are enclosing this list as a piece of information for you as these numbers figure into your attaining the 10%level. Again,the annual Affordable Housing Appeals List is comprised of information and statistics from the sources cited above and,for the 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List,the time period in question(for which properties,certificates and vouchers can be counted)is October 1,2002 through September 30,2003. Please take the time to review these lists with your town clerk,town planner and/or housing authority to ensure that we have counted items for your municipality appropriately. If there are discrepancies,we will work with you to make sure that the count is corrected appropriately. AGAIN,the firm deadline for submission of your municipality's count is November 1,2003. Once the Department completes the 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List,it will not be amended until next year's process is started for the 2004 list. 9/25/03 ASSISTED HOUSING - CT Page 1 of 1 Assisted Housing List Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable ousing Appeals List Municipality Project Name Street Address 1 Total Famil Elderly Handicapped Agency Program So.Windsor Flax Hill 30 Foster St. 40 0 40 4 DECD ELD So.Windsor Section 8 C/V 35 35 0 0 HUD S8E So.Windsor Wapping Mews 50 Elm St. 30 0 30 0 DECD ELD DECD Letter Re: 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List Attachment#2: The following is wording from Public Act No.02-87,An Act Concerning the Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure. This public in counting act was effective October 1,2002 and will be helpful to you in counting housing units that may be eligible to reach the ten per cent(10%)level. Sec.3. Subsection(k)of section 8-30g of the general statutes is repealed and the following is submitted in lieu thereof(Effective October 1,2002): (k)Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections(a)to 0),inclusive,of this section;the affordable housing appeals procedure established under this section shall not be available if the real property which is the subject of the application is located in a municipality in which at least ten percent of all dwelling units in the municipality are(1)assisted housing,or(2)currently financed by Connecticut Housing Finance Authority mortgages,or(3)subject to binding recorded deeds containing covenants or restrictions which require that such dwelling units be sold or rented at,or below,prices which will preserve the units as housing for which persons and families pay thirty per cent or less of income,where such income is less than or equal to eighty per cent of the median income,or(4)mobile manufactured homes located in mobile manufactured home parks or legally-approved accessory apartments,which homes or apartments are subject to binding recorded deeds containing covenants or restrictions which require that such dwelling units be sold or rented at,or below,prices which will preserve the units as housing for which,for a period of not less than ten years,persons and families pay thirty per cent or less of income where such income is less than or equal to eighty per cent of the median income. The Commissioner of Economic and Community Development shall,pursuant to regulations adopted under the provisions of chapter 54,promulgate a list of municipalities which satisfy the criteria contained in this subsection and shall update such list not less than annually. For the purpose of determining the percentage required by this subsection,the commissioner shall use as the denominator the number of dwelling units in the municipality,as reported in the most recent United States decennial census. As used in this subsection, "accessory apartment"means a separate living unit that(A)is attached to the main living unit of a house which house has the external appearance of a single-family residence,(B)has a full kitchen,(C)has a square footage that is not more than thirty per cent of the total square footage of the house,(D)has an internal doorway connecting to the main living unit of the house,(E)is not billed separately from such main living unit for utilities,and(F)complies with the building code and health and safety regulations. J j DECD Letter Re:2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List Attachment#3: The following is a listing of 2003 median family income figures according to appropriate PMSA,MSA or Non-Metropolitan County(wherever the town in question is located.) Bridgeport,CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$75,200 Includes: Fairfield county towns of Bridgeport,Easton,Fairfield,Monroe,Shelton,Stratford,Trumbull; and New Haven county towns of Ansonia,Beacon Falls,Derby,Milford,Oxford and Seymour. Danbury,CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$95,700 Includes: Fairfield county towns of Bethel,Brookfield,Danbury,New Fairfield,Newtown,Redding, Ridgefield,Sherman;and Litchfield county towns of Bridgewater,New Milford,Roxbury,and Washington. Hartford,CT MSA: FY 2003 median family income=$73,000 Includes: Hartford county towns of Avon,Berlin,Bloomfield,Bristol,Burlington,Canton,East Granby, East Hartford,East Windsor,Enfield,Farmington,Glastonbury,Granby,Hartford,Manchester, Marlborough,New Britain,Newington,Plainville,Rocky Hill,Simsbury, Southington,South Windsor, Suffield,West Hartford,Wethersfield,Windsor,Windsor Locks;Litchfield county towns of Barkhamsted, Harwinton,New Hartford,Plymouth,Winchester;and Middlesex county towns of Cromwell,Durham,East Haddam,East Hampton,Haddam,Middlefield,Middletown,Portland;New London county towns of Colchester,Lebanon;Tolland county towns of Andover,Bolton,Columbia,Coventry,Ellington,Hebron, Mansfield, Somers,Stafford,Tolland,Vernon,Willington;and Windham county towns of Ashford, Chaplin and Windham. New Haven-Meriden,CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$71,000 Includes: Middlesex county towns of Clinton,Killingworth;New Haven county towns of Bethany, Branford,Cheshire,East Haven,Guilford,Hamden,Madison,Meriden,New Haven,North Branford, North Haven,Orange,Wallingford,West Haven,and Woodbridge. New London-Norwich,CT MSA: FY 2003 median family income=$65,400 Includes: Middlesex county town of Old Saybrook;New London county towns of Bozrah,East Lyme, Franklin,Griswold,Groton,Ledyard,Lisbon,Montville,New London,North Stonington,Norwich,Old Lyme,Preston, Salem, Sprague, Stonington,Waterford;and Windham county towns of Canterbury and Plainfield. Stamford-Norwalk,CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$110,500 Includes: Fairfield county towns of Darien,Greenwich,New Canaan,Norwalk, Stamford,Weston, Westport,and Wilton. Waterbury,CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$64,600 Includes: Litchfield county towns of Bethlehem,Thomaston,Watertown,Woodbury;and New Haven county towns of Middlebury,Naugatuck,Prospect, Southbury,Waterbury and Wolcott. Worcester MA-CT PMSA: FY 2003 median family income=$68,000 Includes: Windham county town of Thompson. i 1 NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES Hartford County: FY 2003 median family income=$76,900 Includes: Hartland Litchfield County: FY 2003 median family income=$67,700 Includes: Canaan,Colebrook,Cornwall,Goshen,Kent,Litchfield,Morris,Norfolk,North Canaan, Salisbury,Sharon,Torrington and Warren. Middlesex County: FY 2003 median family income=$85,900 Includes: Chester,Deep River,Essex,and Westbrook. New London County: FY 2003 median family income=$77,300 Includes: Lyme and Voluntown. Tolland County: FY 2003 median family income=$73,400 Includes: Union Windham County: FY 2003 median family income=$63,500 Includes: Brooklyn,Eastford,Hampton,Killingly,Pomfret,Putnam, Scotland,Sterling,and Woodstock. y CHFA Mortgages Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List 1 Andover 31 2 Ansonia 215 3 Ashford 79 4 Avon 33 5 Barkhamsted 18 6 Beacon Falls 43 7 Berlin 107 8 Bethany 3 9 Bethel 129 10 Bethlehem 4 11 Bloomfield 405 12 Bolton 32 13 Bozrah 25 14 Branford 166 15 Bridgeport 2,017 16 Bridgewater 1 17 Bristol 1,363 18 Brookfield 94 19 Brooklyn 126 20 Burlington 43 21 Canaan 9 22 Canterbury 79 23 Canton 48 24 Chaplin 26 25 Cheshire 88 26 Chester 12 27 Clinton 67 28 Colchester 173 29 Colebrook 4 30 Columbia 44 31 Cornwall 3 32 Coventry 189 33 Cromwell 195 34 Danbury 836 35 Darien 4 36 Deep River 24 37 Derby 98 38 Durham 17 39 East Granby 30 40 East Haddam 39 41 East Hampton 93 42 East Hartford 1,282 43 East Haven 472 44 East Lyme 127 45 East Windsor 144 46 Eastford 21 47 Easton 48 Ellington 130 49 Enfield 1,051 50 Essex 14 51 Fairfield 63 52 Farmington 150 53 Franklin 16 54 Glastonbury 143 55 Goshen 3 56 Granby 48 Page 1 of 3 CHFA Mortgages Counted b DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List 57 Greenwich 6 58 Griswold 246 59 Groton 488 60 Guilford 42 61 Haddam 14 62 Hamden 600 63 Hampton 19 64 Hartford 1,960 65 Hartland 7 66 Harwinton 27 67 Hebron 50 68 Kent 9 69 Killingly 476 70 Killingworth 4 71 Lebanon 72 72 Ledyard 237 73 Lisbon 86 74 Litchfield 21 75 Lyme 1 76 Madison 1 22 77 Manchester 1,166 78 Mansfield 104 79 Marlborough 26 80 Meriden 1,495 81 Middlebury 19 82 Middlefield 26 83 Middletown 668 84 Milford 350 85 Monroe 21 86 Montville 322 87 Morris 6 88 Naugatuck 478 89 New Britain 1,624 90 New Canaan 3 91 New Fairfield 73 92 New Hartford 35 93 New Haven 1,672 94 New London 574 95 New Milford 237 96 Newington 512 97 Newtown 27 98 Norfolk 4 99 North Branford 63 100 North Canaan 8 101 North Haven 90 102 North Stonington 27 103 Norwalk 491 104 Norwich 685 105 Old Lyme 12 106 Old Saybrook 37 107 Orange 10 108 Oxford 9 109 Plainfield 479 110 Plainville 458 111 Plymouth 239 112 Pomfret 24 113 Portland 60 Page 2of3 CHFA Mortgages Counted by DECD for 2002 Affordable Housing Appeals List 114 Preston 39 115 Prospect 31 116 Putnam 202 117 Redding 118 Ridgefield 17 119 Rocky Hill 180 120 Roxbury 1 121 Salem 24 122 Salisbury 6 123 Scotland 30 124 Seymour 111 125 Sharon 6 126 Shelton 95 127 Sherman 3 128 Simsbury 68 129 Somers 34 130 South Windsor 216 131 Southbury 23 132 Southington 443 133 Sprague 35 134 Stafford 219 135 Stamford 378 136 Sterling 95 137 Stonington 141 138 Stratford 438 139 Suffield 76 140 Thomaston 110 141 Thompson 134 142 Tolland 138 143 Torrington 776 144 Trumbull 19 145 Union 6 146 Vernon 488 147 Voluntown 53 148 Wallingford 485 149 Warren 3 150 Washington 5 151 Waterbury 2,953 152 Waterford 294 153 Watertown 233 154 West Hartford 459 155 West Haven 744 156 Westbrook 25 157 Weston 1 158 Westport 14 159 Wethersfield 270 160 Willington 59 161 Wilton 3 162 Winchester 140 163 Windham 474 164 Windsor 413 165 Windsor Locks 238 166 Wolcott 214 167 Woodbridge 6 168 Woodbury 17 169 Woodstock 66 Page 3 of 3 State of Connecticut-2000 Consolidated Plan- V. Housing Needs Assessment Page 1 of 2 3. Elderly The 1990 Census shows that persons age 65 and over totaled 445,664 or 13.6 percent of the State's population. Connecticut's elderly population dropped slightly(less than 0.1 percent)from the 1990 Census while the total population in Connecticut(3,287,116 in 1990)expanded only 0.2 percent to 3,294,272 in 1997.In 1990, Connecticut's largest municipalities;Bridgeport,Waterbury,New Haven,Stamford,and Hartford were home to the largest numbers of elderly persons.According to 1998 Census data estimates,a total of 32,394 persons, or 12 percent of all persons age 65 and over,lived in poverty.Best estimates indicate that Hartford,New Haven,Bridgeport,Waterbury,and New Britain contain the largest numbers of elderly below poverty. In 1997,there were an estimated 463,438 elderly households in Connecticut.Projections through 2002 anticipate that the population over age 65 will be in the neighborhood of 498,488 persons,and is expected to grow to 514,318 by 2007.These are 7.6%and 11.0%increases,respectively. The 1990 Census demonstrated that,of the 209,410 elderly households that occupied owner units, 105,886 or 50.6%classified as low income.These households had incomes at or below 80%of their Area Median Income (AMI).Of all low income elderly homeowner households,39.3%or 41,625 paid shelter costs which equaled 30%or more of their total households income.A total of 18,279 or 17.3%of all elderly households in homeowner paid shelter costs which equaled 50%or more of their total household income. Of the 82,577 elderly households that occupied renter units,67,327 or 81.5%were classified as low income. Of the low income elderly renter households,55.7%or 37,509 were shown to experience cost burden,while 27.3%or 18,396 where shown to experience severe cost burden. An analysis of data concerning elderly households by tenure and income level reveals several general facts regarding the state's elderly population.Connecticut's elderly households overwhelmingly(71.7%)reside in owner-occupied housing.There was only one elderly income group that had a greater percentage of renter households,that was the extremely low income bracket.This group was comprised of 54.3%renter households and 45.7%owner households.With increased income,the level of homeownership rose substantially.The elderly very low income group was made up of 67.8%owner households and 32.2%renter households.The elderly low income group was composed of 77.9%owners and 22.1%renters.Elderly households that do reside in owner units are more secure financially than elderly household which reside in renter units.While 56.6%elderly owner households were considered low income,81.5%elderly renter households fell into the low income category.Low income elderly owner households expended less household income on shelter costs than low income elderly renter households.Of all elderly owner households,39.3%faced cost burden compared to 55.7%elderly renter households.Elderly owner households which experienced severe cost burden was 17.3%versus 27.3 percent for elderly renter households. The following presents data on Connecticut's extremely low,very low,and low income elderly households. Extremely Low Income(0%to 30%AM])Elderly Households Number of Households #of households %of households #of renter %of renter %of renter %of renter in this Category 1990 the own their the own their households households households paying households home home >30%of paying>50% household income of household on shelter costs income on shelter costs 72,529 33,182 45.8% 39,347 54.3% 59% 35% Of the 33,182 households that own their home,75%experienced cost burden,while 43%experienced severe cost burden. Very Low Income(31%to 50%AMI)Elderly Households Number of Households in #of households %of households #of renter %of renter this Category 1990 the own their the own their households households home home 56,948 38,623 67.8% 18,325 32.2% • Very low income renter households experienced a greater cost burden than elderly owner households in this income group. http://www.state.ct.us/ecd/publications/2` 000conplan/section5.html 9/27/2002 State of Connecticut-2000 Consolidated Plan- V. Housing Needs Assessment Page 2 of 2 • Fifty-six percent of very low income elderly renter households experienced cost burden compared to 33%of the 38,623 very low income elderly owner households. • Twenty-two percent of the elderly renter households experienced a serve cost burden compared to only 8%of the elderly owner very low income households. Low Income(51%to 80%AMn Elderly Households Number of Households in #of households %of households #of renter [22.1% of renter this Category 1990 the own their the own their households useholds home home 43,736 34,081 77.9% 9,655 Of the low income elderly renter households,42%experienced cost burden and 5%experienced severe cost burden.This compares to 12%low income elderly owner households which experienced cost burden and 3% that experienced severed burden. As Connecticut's elderly population continues to grow there will be a need for increased attention to the special housing circumstances and needs of the elderly.The State's elderly population is tremendously diverse in its housing preferences,financial characteristics,and health status.What census data shows is that the elderly who are most in need of housing assistance are the low income renter households.Elderly renters,many of whom are on fixed incomes,find that they cannot keep pace with the escalating rental rates.This results in an increasing cost burden which reduces disposable income that could be targeted towards other necessary living expenses.These households are concentrated in the State%larger urban areas.Low income elderly persons are drawn to more developed areas of the state opposed to more rural settings for several reasons.These areas contain more accessible services such as medical care,pharmacies,food stores,and public transportation systems h4://www.state.ct.us/ecd/publications/2000conplan/section5.html 9/27/2002 Senior Housing in South Windsor Development Location Type of # of Name housing units Wapping Mews 50 Elm Street Apartments 30 Flax Hill 30 Foster Street Apartments 40 Collins Crossing Hunter Drive Senior Residence 20 Development Collins Hill Cityview Terrace, Vista View Drive Senior Residence 18 Development Porter's Share Share's Lane Senior Residence 20 Development Wyndemere Wyndemere Court Senior Residence 14 Develo ment Pleasant Meadows Garden Circle Senior Residence 20 Development Wheeler Estates Wheeler Road Senior Residence 25 Develo ment Strawberry Fields Dzen's Way, Strawberry Lane Multi-Family 43 (Condo's) Watson Farm Watson Circle Apartments 72 *Berry Patch Winterberry Lane Apartments 102 *Summerwood Summerwood Lane Senior Residence 17 Development *Podunk Ridge Riverview Drive Senior Residence 21 Development #Shady Brook Bailey Circle Senior Residence 20 Develo ment #Smith's Corner 178 Smith Street Senior Residence 3 Development *Under construction �( S`1 = S ` , #Approved but not constructed Prepared by the Planning Department updated 10/30/03 4- v v vx, c1 l�J�r'z � lr✓( 1 l fi � ( tlC s F Selected Demographic Data Seniors (Age 65+) Total o ulation 24,412 Comments: Total age 65+ 2899 people 12%of total) C- G q .2 3 65-74 1698 59%of seniors 75-84 894 31 85+ 307 (11%) Households with 1 or more 1953 seniors Living alone Male 139 Seniors living alone comprise about Female 518 34% of all households with one or Group Quarters 196 more seniors Household income by age The 55-64 age group is included for (median) comparison purposes (median income drops far 55-64 $84,021 65-74 $50,045 Max. $1250 for monthlyhousingcosts 75+ $23,571 Max. $600 for monthly housing costs Poverty level for a single senior= $8,250, for 2 seniors in a household Income below poverty level: headed by a senior 65+ =10,419 All ages 439 1.8% Seniors are below poverty level at 65 and over 133 4.6% almost 3 times the rate of the rest of 65-74 33 seniors the population; and older seniors (75+) 75+ 90 seniors at a rate 3 times as high as younger seniors 65-74) Of the seniors that are below poverty level, 55% are in married couple households. For seniors above poverty level, that number rises to 64%. There are single women householders but no single men householders below poverty level. 1 Total dwelling units Owner occupied 7951 Renter occupied 952 Total#in homeowner- Total#in owner-occupied Total#in renter-occupied occupied homes housing 22,200 housing 2008 Senior homeowners 1416 6%of owners Senior renters 221 (11% of renters) Seniors form a larger percentage of total renters than total homeowners Median sales price of homes Single family$208,450 The"average"household is paying in South Windsor, 7-2001 to Condominium 108,450 $1500 a month mortgage costs for a 6-2002 All categories $160,500 $160,500 unit Homeowner median monthly $1490 This amount is 75%of the median cost(w/mortgage) annual income for seniors above 75; 36% of the annual household income for seniors 65-75; and 21% of the annual household income for the 55- Monthly owner costs as %of 64 age grolip. household income all ages): Income less than$19,999 344 homeowners 72%pay more than 30% of While this data is not specific for income toward housing seniors, at the very least the same $20,000-34,999 517 homeowners 52%pay more than 30%of inferences can be drawn as for the income toward housing population as a whole $35,000-49,999 716 homeowners 47%pay more than 30%of income toward housing $50,000-74,999 1614 homeowners 25%pay more than 30%of income toward housing $75,000-99,999 1592 homeowners 9%pay more than 30% of income toward housin 2 Renter median monthly rent $844 This amount is 43%of the median annual income for seniors above 75 Rent as % of household income all ages): Income less than $19,999 171 renters 54%pay more than 30%of While this data is not specific for income for rent seniors, at the very least the same $20,000-34,999 155 renters 47%pay more than 30% of inferences can be drawn as for the income for rent population as a whole. $35,000-49,999 139 renters 28%pay more than 30% of income for rent $50,000-74,999 251 3%pay more than 30%of income for rent Condominium Values October 2002 Value range Number of units Average value 0-$104,000 768 $76,500 $104,001-208,000 1,324 $153,000 208,001-312,500 152 $220,000 3 Annual Report of New Deed-Restricted Housing New Units Deed•Restricted From Oct. 1, 2002 to Sept. 30, 2003 TOWN NAME: COMPLETE IF THERE'S #DR Deed Restriction OTHER GOUT ASSISTANCE Street Address UNITS Start Date Duration Agency Program __7 0 1 f"e-t44— .5 7 />0 >002— PLEASE MAKE ADDITIONAL COPIES AS NEEDED '7"f DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers * planners * surveyors NOV - 4 2003 gis * gps ♦ landscape architects Transmitted via certified mail SOUTH VVINDSOR PLAININIINIGN`PT November 4, 2003 Dear Current Abutting Property Owner Re: Berry Farm H(Elderly Housing) Oakland Road(Route 30), Felt Road and Buckland Road South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 03-1823 In accordance with regulations of the Inland Wetlands Agency and the Planning&Zoning Commission, we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing(s)by the Inland Wetlands Agency and Planning& Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and/or give comments, however, you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard, please contact Kelli Koehler, Administrative Secretary, Michele Lipe, Deputy Planning Director, or Jeffrey Folger, Environmental Planner, at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253, 252 or 229, respectively. Thank you. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: Peter R. DeMallie Principal cc: Jeffrey Folger Marcia Banach Geoffrey Sager 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755*Fax: (860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com NOV - 4 2003 Direct Abutting Property Owners Berry Patch II SOUTH 4'didUSOR I'LA!h!I�! u ( I Oakland Road(Route 30), Felt Road&Buckland Road South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 03-1823 Maa/Lot Abutting Property Owner(s) Mailing Address 38/2 Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God 400 Buckland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 39/53 Robert N. &Amy L. (Surv)Gamache 25 Grandview Terrace South Windsor, CT 06074 39/54 Karen A. &Edward J. O'Connor 35 Grandview Terrace South Windsor, CT 06074 39/55 Robert&Penelope P. (Surv)Torrani 39 Grandview Terrace South Windsor, CT 06074 39/64 Michael J. &Kristina G. Suppicich 65 Summit Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 51/11 Dennis C. & Sharon E. Platt 97 Box Mountain Drive Vernon, CT 06066 51/12 Richard S. Kelley 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 51/13 Harold L. Dodd 512 Buckland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 51/25 Melvin D. Stein 69 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 51/26 Marian&Teresa(SL1)Malyszczycki 101 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 51/33 The Village at Buckland Court 432 Buckland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 52/91 Lois H. Petersen 440 Deming St. South Windsor, CT 06074 52/93 Pauline G. Johnson 195 Oakland Road, Box 453 South Windsor, CT 06074 52/94 Mildred S. Lu&Kenneth Simler 151 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 AFFORDABILITY PLAN FOR 2.003 BERRY PATCH II Parcel 51-32 and a portion of Parcel 38-2, as more particularly shown on plan entitled, "Berry Patch II, Site Development Plan/Special Exception, Buckland Road & Deming Street, South Windsor, Connecticut," prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., Sheet 1, dated November 4, 2003 December 2003 APPLICANT The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. South Windsor Housing Authority 6 Executive Drive 1540 Sullivan Avenue Suite 100 South Windsor, CT 06074 Farmington,CT 06032 CONTENTS Introduction And Statement On Affordability And Operations A. Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan B. Sample Declaration and Agreement of Restrictive Covenants C. CHFA 2003 Schedule of Maximum Affordable Gross Rent and Income Limits INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT ON AFFORDABILITY AND OPERATIONS The Applicant will establish a single purpose limited liability partnership through which entity it will acquire Parcel 51-32 and a portion of Parcel 38-2, as more particularly shown on plan entitled, 'Berry Patch II, Site Development Plan/Special Exception,Buckland Road& Deming Street, South Windsor,Connecticut," and execute a Declaration and Agreement of Restrictive Covenants ("Declaration")with the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority ("CHFA")for the purpose of constructing and operating an elderly affordable housing development of 94 units. This new entity will be created and controlled by Geoffrey W. Sager, who owns 100 percent of The Metro Realty Group,Ltd. ("Metro Realty"). When reference is made to "the Applicant" in this Affordability Plan,it is meant to reference either Metro Realty and the South Windsor Housing Authority, or the new entity pursuant to which Metro Realty will undertake this affordable housing development. The Applicant will be responsible for the administration of the Affordability Plan. Indeed,Metro Realty, through other single purpose limited partnerships which Mr. Sager has created, has extensive experience with administrating similar affordability plans in South Windsor,Avon,Berlin, and Canton,communities in which it has constructed elderly housing developments based on this same design model. This affordable housing development proposal is intended to be financed by CHFA. Seventy-nine percent, or 75 units, will be made available to elderly persons whose income does not exceed 60 percent of the area median income. The maximum rentals for those units are shown at Tab C, Option B. The remainder of the units will be leased at market rental rates. Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g, and the terms of the Declaration,the Applicant will be responsible for the following: a. ensuring that household applying for affordable units qualify within applicable income limits; b. assuring the accuracy of rents and providing documentation when necessary to lessees and financing institutions; C. reporting on compliance to CHFA and the Town of South Windsor; and d. executing the affirmative fair housing marketing plan set forth in this Affordability Plan. The Applicant will be required, pursuant to Paragraphs 7 and 13 of the Declaration (Tab B),to annually provide CHFA with verification that all Declaration covenants on affordability and income verification are being met. This information will also be made available to the Town of South Windsor. A sample compliance monitoring form to be completed by potential tenants and used for reporting on qualifying family income and rental limits is found under Exhibit B of the Declaration. Exhibit C of the Declaration contains a blank owner's annual certification form to substantiate the development's continued compliance with obligations and representations on affordability and suitability for occupancy, as required by governing statutes and the Declaration. 359530 - 2 - EXHIBIT A BERRY PATCH II AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING PLAN The Applicant shall: (i)comply with all fair housing laws,including,but not limited to: The Fair Housing Act(42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seg. ;Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3600-3620); Section 7 (d),Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. § 3535 (d); and(ii) administer an affirmative fair housing marketing plan and advertising in compliance with Fair Housing Advertising Policy(24 C.F.R. § 109)to senior citizens of all minority and majority groups,regardless of race,color,religion, sex, handicap, familial status (except that all tenants must be 62 or above), or national origin. The Applicant shall develop an Education and Outreach Initiative in order to coordinate programs with the afore-mentioned community-based organizations, designed to inform members of the community,especially persons not likely to be aware of the availability of this housing and their ability to obtain it on a nondiscriminatory basis. The Applicant shall be responsible for: (A) analyzing census and other data to identify racial and ethnic groups least represent in the population; (B) development of informative materials on fair housing rights,with special outreach materials targeted to inform all persons of the availability of this housing opportunity, especially those not likely to apply for housing through newspaper advertising and those in geographic areas of high minority concentration within the housing market; (C) development of fair housing and affirmative marketing instructional materials for local housing groups; (D) educational seminars and working sessions for civic associations, community based organizations, churches, fair housing, and other groups; (E) advertising, which shall include "Equal Housing Opportunity" Logotype, Statement, and Illustration, and shall be prominently and conspicuously displayed in the offices in which the rental activities takes place,placed in the type of media customarily used by the Applicant, including minority publications and other minority outlets which are available in the housing market area(all advertising depicting persons shall depict persons of majority and minority groups); (F) maintaining a non-discriminatory hiring policy in recruiting from both minority and majority groups for staff engaged in the rental of Berry Patch II and assisting minority applicants in processing applications; and (G) instructing all employees and agents in writing and orally in the policy of non-discrimination and fair housing. The new resident orientation procedures which will be implemented by the Applicant will educate tenants and apprise them of their rights and responsibilities. This program involves an extensive review of the articles of the lease,tenant responsibilities,management responsibilities, . use of mechanical equipment and appliances within a unit, a walk-through of the unit,briefing of the rules of the complex, summary process procedures, and assessment of cost of tenant-related damages to equipment, appliances,or other damage to the complex as a result of tenant misuses. This educational procedure makes it easier for the tenant to comply with lease guidelines and increases the likelihood of long term and trouble-free occupancy by the Tenant. 359530 - 2 - EXHIBIT B DECLARATION AND AGREEMENT OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Declaration and Agreement of Restrictive.Covenants(this"Agreement")made and entered into as of the day of •, 20 .0 by and between BERRY PATCH II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership.organized ana existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut,with an office and principal place of business at 6 Executive Drive, Farmington; Connecticut 06032 (the "Declarant"), and the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, a body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut, having its office and principal place of business at 999 West Street, Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067(the"Authority"), W ITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Declarant, as owner in fee simple of the property described in Exhibit A-attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"), has applied to the ..- Authority for a first mortgage loan in the amount-of__ up to (the "Mortgage Loan") to aid the Declarant Fn financing the acquisition and construction on the Property of a multifamily rental housing development for persons of low and moderate income, pursuant to the provisions (i)of the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority Act, Chapter 7 134 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended (the Act") and (ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") and the regulations promulgated thereunder,as amended(the"Regulations"); WHEREAS, the Property is known as BERRY PATCH II located at Buckland Road/Deming t Street, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074, and is identified as Authority Development No. 04. e� WHEREAS, Declarant acknowledges that: the Authority is _.. g (') ty providing the Mortgage Loan to the Declarant to finance the Development in furtherance of its corporate purposes under the Act, and (ii) the accomplishment of such purposes is _ dependent in part upon compliance by the Declarant with the restrictive covenants set forth herein; WHEREAS, Declarant acknowledges the resulting beneficial interest of the Authority in the Development and acknowledges that Declarant's ownership and operation of the Development are in furtherance of the discharge of a public trust; _ WHEREAS, the Authority, as a condition of its willingness to.-make the Mortgage Loan, requires that the Declarant, by entering into the restrictions, terms, conditions and covenants set forth below, consent to be regulated and restricted by the Authority in the management and operation of the Development as herein provided and as provided by the Mortgage Loan Documents (as defined below), the Act, the Code, the Regulations, and any rules, regulations,policies,and Procedures of the Authority;and WHEREAS, Declarant is willing to execute and abide by this Agreement as a condition of obtaining the Mortgage Loan and receiving continuing benefits under the Act, the Code and the Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Mortgage Loan, and of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY. This Agreement affects the Property which is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. * Contingent upon securing funding from CHFA and land use approvals from the Town of South Windsor. 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement,the terms below shall have the definitions set forth for each one: a. "Apartment Mid'means the apartment mix for the Qualified Units,as follows: Area Median Income 25%or Less 50%or Less . 60%or Less 1 Bedroom 25 2 Bedroom 50 b. "Approved Plans" means the plans, drawings-and specification_s described to the Authority's Board of Directors in the Resolution adopted as amended and accepted by the Authority; C. "Compliance Period"means with respect to any building,the period of fifteen (15) taxable years beginning with the first (1st) taxable year of the credit period as defined in Section 42(i)(1)of the Code with respect thereto; d. "Development" means all real and personal property and all assets of whatever nature or wherever situate, used in or owned by the business conducted on the Property,which business is to provide rental housing accommodations for persons of low and moderate income and other facilities incidental thereto. Declarant shall make no change in the nature, size (including number of units) or location of the Development from that which was shown on the Approved Plans; e. "Extended Use Period"with respect to a building means the period (i)beginning on the first (1st) day in the Compliance Period in which such building is part of a qualified low-income housing project, and (ii)ending on the date which is thirty n 30 years aft _( )y after close of the Compliance Period; f. - "Fiscal Year'means the calendar year or any other period agreed to in writing by the parties hereto as the fiscal year for the Declarant; g. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or any federal successor thereto; h. "Income Limitation" means 25 percent, 50 percent or 60 percent of area median gross income, as the case may be, adjusted for family size, within the meaning of the Code and the Regulations. For this purpose,income is determined as defined ' at 24 CFR 813.106(1987); _ I. "Mortgage.Loan" means the{AmountTBD interest bearing obligation evidenced If by a promissory note of even date herewith from Mortgagor to the Authority (the "Authority Note") and secured by a mortgage deed (the "Authority Mortgage") which Authority Mortgage shall constitute a first lien on the Development; j. "Mortgage Loan Documents" means, collectively,the Authority Note,the Authority Mortgage, Security Agreement, the Covenant of Compliance and Regulatory Agreement, the Collateral Assignment of Leases and Rentals, Building Loan Agreement and this Agreement, all of even date herewith, along with the Authority's Mortgage Loan Commitment Letter dated t Date TBD" as amended, and all other documents executed by Mortgagor in connection with the Mortgage Loan; k. "Qualified Person(s)" means elderly (age 62 or older) members of the general public who, at the time each such individual or family first occupies a unit in the Development have annual income as set out in Section 3.f.1; I. "Qualified Rent" means an annual gross rental not greater than thirty percent (30%) of the annual Income Limitation applicable for such unit for each Qualified Person,in accordance with the Statute,the Code and the Regulations; pursuant to Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 2 Section 42 of the Code, the maximum rental limits applicable to Qualified Units shall be revised by a percentage;equal to any percentage change in Area Median Income. "Qualified Rent does not include any payment under Section 8 or any comparable rental assistance program (with respect to such Qualified Units or occupants thereof) and any equivalent rental payment under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 or fee for a supportive service as defined by the Code, but shall include any utility allowance applicable pursuant to the Code, after taking into account such determinations under such Section 8; M. "Qualified Unit"means a residential unit at the Development occupied,or available for occupancy,by a Qualified Person(s)at the Qualified Rent; n. "Section 42 Income Limitation" means 60 percent of area median gross income adjusted for family size,within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. For this purpose, income is determined as defined under HUD regulations at 24 CFR 813- 106(1987). o. "State"means the State of Connecticut. 3. RESTRICTION ON USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT The Declarant hereby covenants and represents to the Authority as follows: a. The Development-The Development shall consist of the facilities described in the 6-5 Approved Plans and shall be located on the Property; b. Components of Development - The Development shall consist of a building or buildings or structure and facilities functionally related and subordinated thereto, owned by the same person(s)for tax purposes,all located on a single tract of land � ,_i and financed under a common plan of finance,and uawd 1. each containing one or more similar units, having separate and complete facilities for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for a single =' person or a family, and facilities which are functionally related and K subordinate to such units;and 2. all of the residential units of which shall be rented or available on a s non-transient basis for rental to members of the,general public, shall be _ suitable for residential occupancy, and shall comply with all State and localAM- e: health,safety and building codes. A. a =t - C. The Declarant shall proceed with due diligence to promptly complete construction of the Development in accordance with the Approved Plans. d. Change in Development-The Declarant shall make no change in the nature, size (including number of residential units) or location of the Development from that which was shown on the Approved Plans, as modified to date, without the prior written consent of the Authority. e. Continuous Rental Restriction - The Declarant on a continuous basis shall maintain all of the units in the Development either as rented or available for rental to members of the general public during the Qualified Project Period, the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period. f. Qualified Low-Income Housing Project Restriction 1. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to comply with the requirements for qualified residential rental projects, the requirements for obtaining low- income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Code with respect to the Development during the Compliance Period and its obligations under the Extended Low-Income Housing Commitment entered into between Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 3 Declarant and the.Authority pursuant to Section 42(h)(6) of the Code and incorporated herein by reference.} During the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period, each residential unit in the Development shall be rented or available for rental on a continuous basis to members of the general public on other than a transient basis, and seventy-five units(75) of said Qualified Units (the "Qualified Units") shall be both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose annual income is: 60 PERCENT or less of the area median gross income adjusted for family size,in accordance with the following: (a)' The Qualified Units will be leased,or vacant and available for lease: (i) only to Qualified Persons, in accordance with the Apartment Mix; (ii) at a rental not greater than 30 PERCENT of the Income Limitation for such unit in accordance with Section 42(g)(2)of the Code; (b) The maximum rents that can be charged for such units shall be uniform for each particular housing unit size (e.g., one bedroom units, two bedroom units) regardless -of the number of persons residing in such unit; } (c) At the discretion of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury,the maximum income levels may deviate from the area median income to reflect current or future policy on income limits with respect to areas with unusually low family income or high housing cost relative to family s income consistent with HUD's determination under Section 8; seventy-five (75) (d) The Development shall have at least i qualified Units; The Qualified Units shall remain Qualified Units during the Extended Use Period. 2. Income and area median gross income shall be determined in a mannerF consistent with determinations of lower income families under Section 8, adjusted for family size,as determined by HUD;arid 3. The Development shall meet the above requirements no later than the yl _# close of the first year of the credit period as defined in Section 42(f) (1) of the Code, except as otherwise provided and permitted under subsection (g)(3)of Section 42 of the Code. 4. After initial occupancy by Qualified Persons but upon again becoming vacant, a unit shall be treated as occupied by Qualified Persons until occupied, other than for a temporary period by another occupant, at which time the character of the unit shall be redetermined by the new occupant's income. In no event shall a temporary period exceed thirty (30) days. A unit occupied by an individual or family who, at the commencement of occupancy, was a Qualified Person shall be treated as occupied by a Qualified Person during such individual's or family's tenancy in such unit, until such individual's or family's income exceeds 140 percent of the Section 42 Income Limitation at the time of the most recent Determination (as described_below). Once an individual's or family's income exceeds 140 percent of the Section 42 Income Limitation, the unit occupied by such individual or family(an"Overincome Tenant")shall continue to be treated as occupied by a Qualified Person unless, after such Determination but before the next Determination, any residential unit of comparable or smaller size is occupied by a new resident who does not meet the Income Limitation originally applicable to the Over Income Tenant, in accordance with the Apartment Mix. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 4 5. Qualified Rent does not include any payment under Section 8 or any comparable rental assistance program (with respect to such Qualified Units or occupants thereof)and any equivalent rental payment under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 or fee for a supportive service as defined by the Code, but shall include any utility allowance determined by the Secretary of the Treasury after taking into account such. determinations under such Section 8. 6. As required by the Authority,the Declarant shall make a determination (the "Determination")on the basis of current income of whether the income of an individual or family residing in a unit'.of the Development exceeds the applicable Income Limitation. Annually the Declarant ,shall certify compliance with the applicable Income Limitation-to the Authority and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, if required (at such times and in such manner as the Authority and Secretary shall each prescribe). 7. Declarant shall furnish to the Authority, on at least an annual basis, or on some other basis as determined by the Authority to be required by the Code and the Regulations, such information as the Authority shall require, including(i)any compliance forms now or hereafter required to be filed with the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Authority, and (ii) a form entitled 4 "Compliance Monitoring: Owner's Annual Certification" attached hereto as Exhibit B, and to maintain on file Tenant Income Certifications, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C,tenant lists, lease applications, copies of any compliance forms filed with the Secretary of the Treasury or Internal 3- Revenue Service, and awaiting list, in order to permit verification that the 0�p covenants set forth herein are being satisfied by the Declarant. Declarant shall take such action as the Authority shall from time to time deem 4 necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any _ failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. Declarant shall use tenant lease forms acceptable to the Authority, or, if there are no written leases, written and signed certifications of tenants so as to be able _` to determine tenant qualifications or take such other corrective action as is ski necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any _ failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. Such leases or certifications shall provide that(i)each tenant certify as to the accuracy of f; - statements made in the Tenant Income Certification, (ii) agree that individual or family income and other eligibility requirements shall be , deemed substantial and material obligations of his/her tenancy, (iii)comply 4 with all requests for information with respect thereto from the Declarant or the Authority, and (iv)failure to provide accurate information on the Tenant Income Certification or refusal to comply with a request for information with respect thereto shall be a violation of a substantial obligation of his/her tenancy. 9- The Development shall be residential rental housing within the meaning of the Act, the Code and Regulations, and shall be used for the benefit of those members of the general public of low and moderate income upon certain terms and conditions set out below. 1. During the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period,the Declarant shall set aside the Qualified Units in the Development for individuals or families who are Qualified Persons at the Qualified Rent, as determined by the Authority. Thereafter, for a period of not less than thirty (30) years beyond the term of the Mortgage Loan, Declarant shall lease, at the Qualified Rent, or sell or lease said units in the Development in such a manner that said units shall be (eased or sold, or held vacant and available for lease or sale, only to individuals or families who are Qualified Persons, as determined by the Authority,or its successor. Such continuing restriction for said period shall operate as follows: Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 5 (i) If all or any part of the Development is sold,transferred or otherwise conveyed to any other individual, party or entity other than the Declarant, such conveyance shall be made by deed subject to an affirmative covenant running with the land,which covenant shall bind the grantee of such deed, and all successors, assigns, and heirs thereof,to the restrictions contained in this Agreement. In the event that such affirmative covenant is omitted from any such deed of conveyance, they) such affirmative covenant shall be deemed to have been included and shall run with the land described on Exhibit A as if it had been contained in such deed. The covenant and restrictions shall be binding to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity,for the benefit of, in favor of and enforceable by the Authority, or any of its successors, or their successors and assigns as their interest may appear,and (ii) If the Development shall at any time during the Extended Use Period be converted to a common interest community by the Declarant or any grantee as aforesaid, such conversion shall include in the declaration of common interest community an affirmative covenant running with the land and such common interest community shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which shall bind the common interest community association, the common _a_... interest community unit owner and their respective successors and assigns, to the restrictions contained in this Agreement. Said =` - covenant shall also require that all units in the common interest community shall be sold, or held vacant for sale, only to individuals or families who are Qualified Persons, as determined by the r tea_ Authority or its successor(s)at the time of such sale. The covenant _ shall be binding upon the common interest community association, its successors and its assigns to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, for the benefit of, in favor of and enforceable by the Authority,or any of its successors and assigns as their interests may - appear;said declaration of common interest community shall require that all units that are to be sold or available for sale to individuals or families who are Qualified Persons shall also be subject to the further restriction that no reconveyance of any such unit(s) shall be v� made unless and until the seller of such unit receives a certification in recordable form acceptable to the Authority or its successors or assigns that the prospective purchaser(s)is(are)an individual who is a Qualified Person. The Authority or its successors or assigns shall designate a party to issue such a certification and shall notify the common interest community,from time to time,of the identity of such Party A unit may not be conveyed pursuant to a time-sharing plan as defined in Chapter 734b of the Connecticut General Statutes. 2. In the event of substantial destruction or condemnation of the Development, as determined by the Authority in its sole discretion,which.destruction is not rebuilt or corrected for any reason,then the Declarant shall have the right to request, and the Authority may, so long as it has not delivered any applicable insurance proceeds to the Declarant, release and waive the Declarant and the Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. Upon such destruction or condemnation,the Authority, or its successors, or its assigns, shall execute appropriate documents for the Declarant, its successors or assigns to record on the land records for the city or town where the Development is located rescinding the restrictions contained herein, if the Authority, in its sole discretion, elects to so release and waive the Declarant and Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. If the Authority delivers said insurance proceeds to the Declarant, and the Declarant is required to repair or reconstruct the Development pursuant to the terms of the Authority Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 6 Mortgage, then this Agreement and the restrictions and covenants contained herein shall remain in full force and effect. 3. As required by the Authority, in every Fiscal Year during the longest of the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period or until the Authority Mortgage has been released, Declarant shall deliver to the Authority, in a form accepted by the Authority, a certificate setting forth the percentage of units at the Development occupied by individuals or families who are Qualified Persons. The Authority shall have the right to observe the Declarants records regarding tenants and tenant selection policy for the Development at any time, and to request and receive any information, documentation,or other confirmation that Declarants tenant selection policy complies with the requirements of the Authority. 4. To the extent necessary to comply with the Act,the Authority's Procedures, including, but not limited to, the Qualified Allocation Plan and Application Process Procedures, the Code and the Regulations, the Authority shall have the right to take any and all actions which it deems appropriate,to rent any unleased or vacant dwelling unit in the Development (if the Development is used for rental units),including without limitation thereof the right to the appointment of a receiver to enter upon and take possession of the Property,to enter into tenant leases, to collect all rents, revenues, _ issues, income, products and profits thereof and apply the same as the court may direct or to seek any remedy available or necessary for the enforcement of the covenants and restrictions herein. The receiver shall have the rights and powers permitted under the laws of the State and such other powers as the court making such appointment shall confer. 4. APPLICABLE PERIOD e tit This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect throughout the longest of the - applicable periods to enable the Authority and its successors and assigns to enforce compliance by Declarant with the covenants,terms and conditions of the Mortgage Loan and of this Agreement. The covenants and restrictions of the Declarant herein set forth are intended to be and shall be considered covenants which run with the land and shall bind all subsequent owners of such land, except to the extent herein provided. The Authority and the Declarant hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants set forth herein touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Development by low and moderate income persons, the f intended beneficiaries of such covenants. The covenants of the Declarant set forth herein are enforceable by the Authority as a contract beneficiary whether or not the - Declarant is or remains indebted to the Authority,except to the extent herein provided. 5. CONTROLLING EFFECT Declarant warrants to the Authority that it shall not execute other declarations or agreements with provisions contradictory, or in opposition to, the provisions hereof and that in any event the requirements of this Agreement are paramount and controlling as to the rights and obligations set forth herein and shall supersede any other requirements in conflict therewith. 6. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, as their interests may appear, except that a foreclosing mortgagee, other foreclosing lien holder, or other owner of the equity, a trustee in bankruptcy or heir of any owner shall be exempt from the Declarant's covenants contained in this Agreement, until such time as the foreclosed upon property, or property held by a trustee in bankruptcy, or property taken by devise, is sold, leased or otherwise conveyed, at which time such sale, lease, or conveyance shall be subject to the covenants and restrictions herein. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 7 7. SURVIVAL The covenants of the Declarant set forth herein shall survive a sale, transfer, or other disposition of all or part of,or any interest in,the Development by the Declarant, but shall cease to apply to the Development in the event of involuntary noncompliance caused by fire or other casualty, even though compensated by insurance, government seizure, requisition, change in a federal law or an action of a State or federal government which prevents the Authority from enforcing the requirements herein. The covenants of the Declarant shall also survive a foreclosure if, as a result of such event, at any time during the Extended Use Period the Declarant or a related person (as defined in Section 1.103-10(e)of the Regulations)obtains an ownership interest in the Development. 8. SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS Declarant shall file or record such documents and take such other steps as are necessary in order to ensure that the requirements and restrictions of this Agreement shall be binding upon all owners and/or lessees of the Development. 9. TRANSFERS Declarant shall include the-requirements and restrictions contained in this Agreement in any instrument(s)assigning or transferring any interest in the Development ! ; to another person so that such transferee has notice of, and is bound by, such restrictions, and to obtain the agreement from any transferee to be bound by and comply with the requirements set forth in this Agreement. Declarant shall also provide a copy of such instrument(s)to the Authority promptly. 10. REMEDIES Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, as defined in the Mortgage, the Authority shall have the right to accelerate the Mortgage Loan (if the Declarant is then indebted to the Authority), to pursue its remedies under the Mortgage Loan Documents, to maintain an action or actions in law or in equity against the Declarant, to recover the damages incurred by the Authority from such failure, to require the Declarant (through injunctive relief or specific performance)to comply with the provisions and covenants set forth herein, and to immediately(at the expense of Declarant)cure any failure to comply with the covenants set forth herein. 11. CODE REQUIREMENTS Ott The Declarant acknowledges that this Agreement is based,in part, upon the Code and the Regulations as they exist on the date hereof and that the Code and the Regulations may be subsequently modified or interpreted by the Federal government or the courts in a manner which the Authority believes is inconsistent with the covenants set forth herein. The Declarant shall comply with any additional covenant(s)and restriction(s) which the Authority believes, upon advice of counsel to the Authority, is or are necessary to comply with the Code and the Regulations and which is or are communicated in writing to the Declarant, even though such covenant(s)or restriction(s) is(are) not a part of this Agreement as originally executed; provided, however, that if counsel for the Declarant disagrees with the advice of counsel for the Authority, Declarant shall have the right at its own expense to proceed with obtaining a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or such court interpretation which Declarant deems advisable and in its best interest, and the Authority shall cooperate fully with Declarant in this connection, so long as Declarant bears the Authority's expenses in obtaining such ruling or decision. In such event, such additional covenant or restriction shall be considered a material part of this Agreement as if it had been originally included herein. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 8 12. RECORDING The Declarant shall cause this Agreement and all amendments and supplements hereto and thereto,to be recorded and filed in the conveyance and real property records of the town in which the Property is located and in such other places as the Authority may reasonably request. The Declarant shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with any such recording. 13. COMPLIANCE MONITORING Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to execute, file, and provide any and all information, documentation, or verification required by the federal government or the Authority regarding the covenants and agreements contained herein. Declarant shall pay the Authority's fees as from time to time determined by the Authority for its compliance monitoring duties. 14. INVALIDITY The invalidity of any clause, part or provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 15. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws _ of the State of Connecticut,except to the extent superseded by Federal law. p 16.. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,but all of which,when taken together,shall constitute the same Agreement. 17. NOTICES Unless otherwise provided for herein, all notices and communications required or s permitted hereunder shall be sent to the respective parties' addresses on page 1 hereof, `��'' in writing, and shall be deemed to have been duly given (a) when sent, if sent by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested, postage prepaid), (b) when delivered, if delivered personally, (c) when transmitted, if sent by facsimile and a confirmation of transmission is produced by the sending machine, or (d) when sent, if sent by overnight mail or overnight courier, in each case with a copy (which shall not constitute notice)to the Authority's General Counsel at the above address. Any notice of any kind sent hereunder to any party shall simultaneously be sent to each and every other party hereto. Any notice required hereunder may be-waived in writing by the party entitled to receive such notice. Failure or delay in delivering copies of any notice,demand, request,consent,acceptance,declaration or other communication within any corporation or firm to the persons designated to receive copies shall in no way adversely affect the effectiveness of such notice, demand, request, consent, acceptance, declaration or other communication. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 9 False statements made herein are punishable under the penalty for. p p ty false statement set out in C.G.S.Section 53a-157b. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Signed,Sealed and Delivered BERRY PATCH II 4SSOCIATES in the Presence of: LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: BERRY PATCH II GP, LLC Geoffrey W Sager Managing Member CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY DY. :v _ Gary E.king President-Executive Director R.:n=•- 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT ss: ROCKY HILL COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared,Geoffrey W. Sager, Managing Member of BERRY PATCH II GP, LLC, General Partner of BERRY PATCH II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Connecticut Limited Partnership, as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as Managing Member of BERRY PATCH II GP, LLC,General Partner of BERRY PATCH II T #_ ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,and that said instrument was signed on behalf of and with the authority of said Limited Partnership, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court is STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: ROCKY HILL COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared,GARY E. KING, President-Executive Director of the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY,duly authorized as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said Authority, on behalf of said Authority, before me. _ ComFnissionereflhe-Superiar-GouTt Notary Public SIGNATURE PAGE TO BE REVISED FOR NAME OF DECLARANT TO BE ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICANT FOR OWNERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION OF THIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. 10 EXHIBIT A Description of Parcel 51-32 and a portion of parcel 38-2, as more partially shown on plan entitled Berry Patch II, Site Development Plan/Special Exception,Buckland Road&Deming Street, South Windsor, Connecticut as prepared by Design Professionals,Inc., Sheet 1, dated November 4, 2003 • ,�X f�ir3f�` /� OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF CONTINUING PROGRAM COMPLIANCE • No buildings have been Placed In Service • At least one building has been placed in Service but owner elects to begin credit period in the following year. To: !risen`State Agency name and address . If either of the above applies,please check the appropriate box,and proceed to page 2 to sign and date this form. Certification From: To: Dates: January 1,20 December 31,20 Project Name: Project No: Project Address: City: Zip: Tax iD#of Ownership-Entity: The undersigned on behalf of (the"Owner"), hereby certifies that: fkI I. The project meets the minimum requirements of: (check one) z ❑ 20-50 test under Section 42(g)(1)(A)of the Code ❑ 40-60 test under Section 42(g)(1)(B)of the Code g ❑ 15-40 test for"deep rent-skewed"projects under Section 42(g)(4)and 142(d)(4)(B)of the Code if"Change"list the applicable fraction to be reported to the IRS for each building in the project for the cert1#86601 year on page 3: II. There has been no change in the applicable fraction (as defined in Section 42(c)(1)(13))of any building in� project, or that there was a change and description of the change; ❑NO CHANGE ❑CHANGE Ili. The owner has received an annual income certification from each low-income tenant, and documentation to`Isyppert that certification;or, in the case of a tenant receiving Section 8 housing assistance payments,the statement frbttt public housing authority described in paragraph (b)(1)(vii)of this section; ❑YES ❑ NO IV. Each low-income unit in the project has been rent-restricted under Section 42(g)(2); ❑YES ❑ NO V. All units in the project were for use by the general public(as defined in 1.42-9), including the requirement that no finding of discrimination under the Fair Housing Act,42 U.S.C.3601-3169, occurred for the project. A finding of discrimination includes an adverse final decision by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD),24 CFR 180.680, and adverse final decision by a substantially equivalent state or local fair housing agency, 42 U.S.C.3616a(a)(1), or an adverse judgment from a federal court; ❑ YES ❑ NO VI. The buildings and low-income units in the project were suitable for occupancy, taking into account local:health, safety,and building codes (or other habitability standards), and the State'or local government unit responsible for making local health, safety, or building code inspections did not issue a violation report for any building or low- income unit in the project. If a violation report or notice was issued by the governmental unit,the owner must attach a statement summarizing the violation report or notice or a copy of the violation report or notice to the annual certification submitted to the Agency under paragraph (c)(1)of this section. In addition,the owner must state whether the violation has been corrected; ❑YES ❑ NO Vil. There was no change in the eligible basis (as defined in section 42(d))of any building in the project, or if there was a change the nature of the change(e.g., a common area has become commercial space, or a fee is now charged for a tenant facility formerly provided without charge); ❑ NO CHANGE ❑CHANGE Page 1 of 3 If"Change",state nature of the change on Oage 3: Vlll. All tenant facilities included in the eligible basis under Section 42(d)of any building in the project, such as swimming pools-,other recreational facilities, and parking areas,were provided on a comparable basis without charge to all tenants in the buildings; ❑YES ❑NO IX. If a low-income unit in the project has been vacant during the year,reasonable attempts were or are being made to rent that unit or the next available unit of comparable or smaller size to tenants having a qualifying income before any units in the project were or will be rented to tenants not having a qualifying income; 0 YES ❑ NO X. If the income of tenants of a low-income unit in the building increased above the limit allowed in section 42(g)(2)(D)(ii),the next available unit of comparable or smaller size in the building was or will be rented to tenants having a qualifying income;and ❑YES ❑ NO XI. An extended low-income housing commitment as described in section 42(h)(6)was in effect(for buildings subject to section 7108(c)(1)of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, 103 Stat.2106, 2308-2311, including the requirement under section 42(h)(6)(13)(1v)that an owner cannot refuse to lease a unit in the project to an applicant because the applicant holds a voucher or certificate of eligibility under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937,42 U.S.C. 1437s(for buildings subject to section 13142 (b)(4)of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation kct.of� 1993, 107 Stat.312, (438-439);and ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑NiA XII. All low-income units in the project were used on a nontransient basis(except for transitional housing for the homeless provided under section 42(i)(3)(8)(iiii)or single-room-occupancy units rented on a month-by-mortff=tas-is under section 42(i)(3)(B)(iv). ❑YES ❑ NO ❑HOMELESS _. ?3 X111. The owner received its credit allocation from the portion of the state ceiling set-aside for a project involving'4Ua{ifed non-profit organizations under Section 42(h)(5)of the code and its non-profit entity materially participated;in.the operation of the development within the meaning of Section 469(h)of the Code. ' ❑YES ❑NO [[NIA XIV. There has been no change in the ownership or management of the project: ❑NO CHANGE []CHANGE If"Change",complete page 3 detailing the changes in ownership or management of the project. Note: Failure to complete this form in its entirety will result in noncompliance with program requirements. in addition,any individual other than an owner or general partner of the project is not permitted to sign this form, unless permitted by the state agency. The project is otherwise in compliance with the Code, including any Treasury Regulations, the applicable State Allocation Plan, and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations. This Certification and any attachments are made UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. (Ownership Entity) By: Title: Date: Paoe 2 of 3 PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ITEMS THAT WERE CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR MANAGEMENT ANSWERED"NO"OR"CHANGE"ON (to be completed ONLY if"CHANGE"marked for QUESTIONS 1-14. question 14 above) Question # Explanation Date of TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP Change: axpayerlD Number: Legal Owner Name: General Partnership: Status of Partnership LLC, etc): CHANGES IN OWNER CONTAQId- Date of Change; Owner Contact: Owner Contact Phone: Owner Contact Fax: Owner Contact Email: _ CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT CONTACT Date of Chan e: Management Co. Name: Management Address: Management city, state,zip: Management Contact: Management Contact Phone: Management Contact Fax: Management Contact Email: Page 3 of 3 TENANT INCOME CERTIFICATION Effective Date: TC-100 Move-in Date: ❑ Initial Certification. ❑ Recertification ❑ Other M/DD/YY PART I-DEVELOPMENT DATA Property Name: County: BIM#: Address: Unit Number: #Bedrooms: PART H.HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION HH First Name&Middle Relationship to Head Date of Birth FIT Student Social Security Mbr# Last Name Initial of Household (MMIDD/YYYY) (Y or N) or AIien Reg.No. 1 HEAD 2 3 4 5 6 El a--'-- PART III.GROSS ANNUAL INCOME i USE ANNUAL AMOUNTS HH Other Incotrig(A) (B) (C) (D) ie Mbr# Employment or Wa es Soc.Securi /Pensioris- Public Assistance TOTALS $ $ $ Add totals from(A)through(D),above TOTAL INCOME(E): $ -_ PART IV.INCOME FROM ASSETS Hshid (F) (G) (H) (I) Mbr# T e of Asset. C/I Cash Value of Asset Annual Income froistKs I TOTALS: $ $ Enter Column(H)Total Passbook Rate If over$5000 $ X 2.00% _ (J) Imputed Income S Enter the greater of the total of column I,or J:-imputed income TOTAL INCOME FROM ASSETS(IQ S (L)Total Annual Household Income from all Sources [Add(E)+(K)] $ HOUSEHOLD CERTIFICATION&SIGNATURES The information on this form will be used to determine maximum income eligibility. I/we have provided for each person(s)set forth in Part II acceptable verification of current anticipated annual income. Uwe agree to notify the landlord immediately upon any member of the household moving out of the unit or any new member .moving in. Uwe agree to notify the landlord immediately upon any member becoming a full time student. Under penalties of perjury,I/we certify that the information presented in this Certification is true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and'-belief. The undersigned further understands that providing false representations herein constitutes an act of fraud. False,misleading or incomplete information may result in the termination of the lease agreement. Signature (Dote) Signature (Date) Signature (Date) Signature (Date) PART V. DETERAIINATION OF INCOME ELIGIBILITY RECERTIFICATION ONLY: TOTAL ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME Household Meets Current Income Limit x 140%: FROM ALL;SOURCES: Income Restriction From item(L)on page I S _ at: S ❑ 60% ❑ 50% Household Income exceeds 140%at ❑40/o ❑ 30% recertification:El Yes ❑No Current Income Limit per Family Size: S El Household Income at Move- S Household Size at Move-in: in: PART VI. RENT $ I� Tenant Paid Rent Rent Ass istance: $ Utility Allowance S Other non-optional charges: $ GROSS RENT FOR UNIT: Unit Meets Rent Restriction at: (Tenant paid rent plus Utility Allowance& ❑ 60% ❑50% ❑ 40% ❑ 30%❑ % other non-optional charges) S Maximum Rent Limit for this unit: S PART VII. STUDENT STATUS *Student Explanation: ARE ALL OCCUPANTS FULL TIME STUDENTS? If yes,Enter student explanation* 1 TANF assistance _ (also attach documentation) 2 Job Training Prog 3 Single parent/dependens Il ❑yes ❑no 4 Married/joint retu _ Enter 1-4 ;ate s < PART VIM. PRO GRAM TYPE Mark the preigram(s) Listed below (a through e.) for which this househoid's unit will be counted toward the property's o�cu an requirements. Under each program marked,indicate the household's income status as established by this certification/recertifica4 on. b. HOME ❑ c. Tax Exempt ❑ d. AHDP ❑ e. am) ❑ K a. Tax Credit ❑ (Name of Program) --� . See Part V above. Income Status Income Status Income States income Status D 5 50%AMGI ❑ 50%AMGI ❑ 50%AMGI ❑ ❑ 5 60%'AMGI ❑ 60%AMGI ❑ 80%AMGI ❑ 5 80%AMGI • ❑ 80%AMGI 0 OI** ❑❑ OI** ❑• OI** OI** ** U on recertification household was determined over-income OI accordin to eli ibili re uirements of the program0 marked above. fi SIGNATURE OF OVvNER/REPRESENTATIVE Based on the representations herein and upon the proofs and documentation required to be submitted,the individual(s)named in Part II of this Tenant Income Certification islare eligible under the provisions of Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code,as amended,and the Land Use Restriction Agreement(if applicable),to live in a unit in this Project. SIGNATURE OF OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE DATE 2 Tenant Income Certification(September 2000) EXHIBIT C Connecticut Housing Finance Authority Schedule of Maximum Affordable Gross Rent and Income Limits Federal Statistical Area: Hartford MSA Effective Date:. 2/20/03 Area Median Income: $73,000 (Until Superseded) Taxable Bond Financing - Min. 20%of Units @ 80%Median Income(as defined by HUD) Unit Size Persons HUD Max. Maximum Equiv. Per Unit Income Rent/Month OBR 1.0 39,550 $989 1 BR 1.5 42,375 1 059- 2.0 45,200 213R... 3.0 50,850 . 1.271 _ 4.0 56,500 _ 3BR 4.5 58,750 1469 5.0 61,000 '...•. ..4BR 6.0 65,550 t .'1,639 7.0 70,050 Minimum Set-aside for LIHTC/Tax Exempt Bonds-Option A-Min.20%of Units @ 50%Median income Unit Size Persons HUD Max. Maximum Equiv. Per Unit Income Rent/Month OBR 1.0 25,550 $638 1 BR 1 1.5 27,375 $684 2.0 29,200 $730 213R 3.0 32,850 $821 4.0 36,500 $912 - 313R 1 4.5 37,950 5.0 39,400 $985 4BR 6.0 42,350 $1,058 7.0 45,250 $1 131 Ainimum Set-aside for LIHTC/Tax Exempt Bonds-Option B -Min.40%of Units @ 60%Median Income Unit Size Persons HUD Max. Maximum Equiv. Per Unit Income Rent/Month OBR 1.0 30,660L$8 66 1 BR 1.5 32,85021 2.0 35,0406 2BR 3.0 39,420 5 4.0 43,800- 95 3BR 4.5 45,54038 5.0 47,280 82 4BR 6.0 50,820 70 7.0 54 300 57 .imits for Developments with a Deep Targeting Income Requirement of 25%of AMI Unit Size Persons HUD Max. Maximum Equiv. Per Unit Income Rent/Month OBR 1.0 12,775 $319 1 BR 1.5 13,688 $342 2.0 14,600 $365 ...........•......................... 213R 3.0 16,425 $410 4.0 18,250 . $456 313R 4.5 _ 18,975 $474 -5.0 19,700 $492 4BR 6.0 21,175 $529 7.0 22,625 $565 CONDOMINIUM COMPLEXES NAME OF CONDO # OF UNITS Cinnamon Springs -' 102 Bryewood ✓ 188 Barrington Estates 128 Candlewood✓ &i - 190 Chapel Hill - 168 Burr Meadow✓ 98 Pleasant Hills ✓ 130 Parkview South ✓- 106 Plum Ridge✓ 91 Brookside ✓ 71 Sunfield Y 40- Strawbridge' 259 Westage 142 Flax Hill✓ 40 Wapping Mews- 30 TOTAL UNITS 1778 : Quick Tables - American FactFinder Pagel of 3 RM American FactFi t , DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data Geographic Area: South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut NOTE:For information on confidentiality protection,nonsampling error,and definitions,see hftp://factfiinder census gov/home/en/datanotes/eKpafl u htm. Subject Number Percent Total population 24v412 100.0 2 2/� EX AND AGE '� f r Male 11,762 48. V1 Female 12,65 51.81 Under 5 ears 1,540 6. r� 5 to 9 ears 2 022 8 (� 10 to 14 ears 2,034 8. 15 to 19 ears 1,516 6. 0 to 24 ears 789 3 2 - 5 to 34 ears 2,466 10.1 35 to 44 ears 4,794 19. 5 to 54 ears 3,99 16. - __ 55 to 59 ears 1,370 5. 0 to 64 ears 984 4. 5 to 74 ears 1,698 7. 75 to 84 ears - r f f 85 ears and over 308 1. �b Median age ears 39.0 X 0 (00 18 years and over 17,735 72. �� Male 8,335 34.1 , V--- Female 9,400 38.5iCi ,c 1 years and over 17,111 70.1 l 2 years and over 3,473 14.2. 5 years and over 2,900 11.91 Male 1,209 5.01 'L J� JJ Female 1,691 6.91 (� RACE ne race 24,177 99.White 22,336 91.51ii f 6 Black or African American 721 3.01 American Indian and Alaska Native 45 0.2 Asian 905 3.71 ) Asian Indian 287 1.21 Chinese 174 0.71 Filipino 61 0.2 Japanese 0.01 Korean 144 0. Vietnamese 1331 0. 51 Other Asian 1001 0.41 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 81 0 .01 Native Hawaiian 4 0 Guamanian or Chamorro 3 0 Samoan 1 0. Other Pacific Islander z 0 http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?geo_id=06000US0900371390&ds name=DEC 12/10/2003 Quick Tables -American FactFinder Page 2 of 3 Subject Number Percent Some other race 162 0. Two or more races 235 1. ace alone or in combination with one or more other races s hite 22,530 92. Black or African American 788 3 2 merican Indian and Alaska Native 87 p sian 1,014 4.2 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 14 0.1 Some other race 233 1. HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 24,412 100.0 Hispanic or Latino of any race 554 2.31 Mexican 55 0. Puerto Rican 25 1.01 Cuban 22 0.1 Other Hispanic or Latino 227 0 Not Hispanic or Latino 23,858 97. White alone 21,987 90.1 RELATIONSHIP Total population 24,412 100.0 In households 24,211 99.2 Householder 8,905 36. Spouse 5,847 24.01 Child 7,958 32. Own child under 18 years 6,401 26.2 Other relatives 816 3. Under 18 y7ars -214 0 .91 Nonrelatives 685 2.81 Unmarried partner 321 1. In group quarters 201 0.81 Institutionalized population 194 0.81 Noninstitutionalized population 0 HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households 8,905 100.01 Family households families 6,768 76. With own children under 18 years 3,427 38. Married-couple family 5,847 65. With own children under 18 years 2,950 33.1 Female householder,no husband present 670 7. With own children under 18 years 356 4.01 Nonfamily households 2,137 24.01 Householder living alone 1,762 19. Householder 65 years and over 613 6.91 Households with individuals under 18 years 3,581 40.2 Households with individuals 65 years and over 1,954 21. Average household size 2.72 X Average family size 3.16 X HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 9,071 100.0 Occupied housing units 8,905 98.2 Vacant housing units 166 1.8. For seasonal,recreational,or occasional use 28 p. Homeowner vacant rate(percent) 0.5 X Rental vacant rate(percent) 4.1 X http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?geo_id=06000US0900371390&ds name=Dl... 12/10/2003 • Quick Tables - American FactFinder Page 3 of 3 Subject Number Percent HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units 8 905 100.0 Owner-occupied housing units 7,953 89. Renter-occupied housing units 952 10.71 Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.79 ]AX Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.11 (X)Not applicable Other Asian alone,or two or more Asian categories. 2 Other Pacific Islander alone,or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more other races listed.The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2000 Summary File 1,Matrices P1,P3,P4,P8,P9,P12,P13,P,17,P18,P19,P20, P23,P27,P28,P33,PCT5,PCT8,PCT11,PCT15,H1,H3,H4,H5,H11,and H12. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?geo_id=06000US0900371390&ds name=Dl..: 12/10/2003 JAN-12-2004 14:28 FROM-Metro Realty +8606776919 T-188 P.002/002 F-426 Age 55+ Profile I7usiness Information sowtlons ' h ZIP:06074 South Windsor,CT Census 2000 2003 2008 2003-2008 2003-2008 Change Annual Rate Total Population 24,412 24,786 25,331 545 0.44% Population 55+ 5,254 5,793 6,687 894 2.91% Median Age 39.0 40.6 42.7 2.1 1.01% Households 8,905 9,106 9,455 349 0.76% 4.5 2.36°k %Householders 55+ 33.7 36.4 40.9 Owner/Renter Ratio 8.4 8.5 8.6 0.1 0.23% Population by Age and Sex Male Population Census 2000 2003 2008 ° mbar %of 55+ + Nu Number %of 55+ Number k of 55 TOW 2,375 100.0% 2,639 100.0% 3,076 100.0% 55-59 684 28.8016 769 29.1% 926 30.1% 60-64 482 20.3% 572 21.7% 694 22.6% 65-69 437 13A% 433 16.4% 490 15.9% 70-74 327 13.8% 363 13.81/6 366 11.9% 75-79 237 10.0% 253 9.6% 292 9.5% 80-84 128 5.4% 156 5.9% 186 6.0% 85+ 80 3.4% 93 3.5% 122 4.0% Female Population Census 2000 2003 2008 Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Total 2,879 100.0% 3.154 100.0% 3,611 100.0% 55-59 686 23.8% 797 25.3% 986 27.3% 60-84 502 17.4% 594 18.8% 730 20.2°/u 0 65-69 514 17.9% 492 15.6% 540 15.0 h 70-74 420 14.6% 454 14.4%. 438 12.1% 75-79 318 11.0% 341 10.8% 382 10.6% 80-84 211 7.3% 234 7.4% 270 7.5% 85+ 228 7.9% 242 7.7% 265 7.3% Total Population Census 2000 2003 2008 Number %of Total Pop Number %of Total Pop Number %of Total Pop Total 5,254 21.50/6 5,793 23A% 6,687 26.40/6 55-59 1,370 5.6% 1,566 6.3% 1.912 7.5% 50-64 984 4.0% 1,166 4.7% 1,424 5.6% 65-69 951 3.9% 925 3.7% 1.030 4.1% 70-74 747 3.1% 617 3.3% 804 3.2% 75-79 555 2.3% 594 2.4% 674 2.7% 80-84 339 1.4% 390 1.6% 456 1.8% 85+ 308 1.30/6 335 1.4% 387 1.5% 65+ 2,900 11.9% 3,061 12.3% 3,351 13.20/6 75+ 1,2D2 4.9% 1,319 5.3% 1,517 6.0% Data Note:Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source:U.S.Bureau of the Census,2000 Census Population and Housing.ESRI BIS forecasts for 2003 and 2008. 02003 ESR!BIS Phone:300-394.3620-www-estibis.Com 1/08/2004 Pagel of 6 v . 15 7 N_ PA6E 63 el 883 I, Timothy Wentzell, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission,hereby certify that on January 27, 2004,the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Metro Realty Group, LTD and South Windsor Housing Authority a Special Exception to Article 4.1.11 and Article 7.1.2.4 of the Zoning Regulations and Site Plan o f Development for the construction of an additional 94 units and a waiver to allow up to 196 units for properties located on the easterly side of Buckland Road, southerly side of Oakland Road,northerly of Deming Street,AA30- Zone, Gateway Development Zone, and floodplain zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., Project No. 1823, dated December 12, 2003, as revised. Assessor's Map and Parcel Number: Map#51, 38 Parcel#32,2 More particularly bounded and described as follows: Parcel#1 Map 51, Parcel 32 (Katten Property) Commencing at a stone bound in the easterly line of Buckland Road, which said bound is located at the southwesterly corner of land of Pauline K. Fox;*thence running south 860 16' 50" east and along land of Pauline K. Fox, a distance of two hundred three and ninety one hundredths (203.90) feet to a stone bound; thence turning north ll° 11' 15" east and along land of the said Fox, a distance of one-hundred twenty-five and nineteen one hundredths (125.19) feet-to an iron pipe at land now or formerly of Norman J. Dorey; thence turning south 86° 50' 10" east, a distance of one hundred four and eighty-one (104.81) feet to a stone bound; thence turning north 10*15' 25" west a distance of seve nty-seven and 54 one hundredths (77.54) feet to a stone bound;thence turning north 560 48' 10" east, a distance of one hundred forty-nine and forty-one one hundredths (149.41) feet to a stone bound at land now or formerly of Stein; thence turning south 610 SS' 15" east and along land of the said Stein and land now or formerly of Mangino, a distance of six hundred seventy-seven and seventy one-hundredths (677.70) feet to a pin set at a fence post; thence turning south 55° 9' 40" east, a distance.of one hundred three and seventy-eight one hundredths (103.78) feet to an iron pipe at land now or formerly of Richard H. Simler; thence turning south 10° 46' S5" west and along land of the said Simler, a distance of four hundred eighty-five and twenty-nine one hundredths (485.29) feet to a stone bound at land now or formerly of Norman M. Petersen; thence turning north 71' 6' 15" west and along land of the said Petersen, a distance of seven hundred twenty-seven and eighty-three one.hundredths '(727.83) feet to an Iron pin; thence turning south 850 25' 10" west, a distance of one hundred eighty-eight and forty-four one-hundredths (188.44) feet to a stone bound; thence turning south 160 39' 20" west a distance of one hundred seventy-three and thirty one-hundredths (173.30) feet to a stone bound; thence turning north 810 38' 20" west, a distance of two hundred eighteen and forty-two one-hundredths (218.42) feet to a stone bound on the easterly side of Buckland Road; thence turning north ll° 50' 35" east and along the easterly side of Buckland Road, a distance of five hundred seventeen and seventy- three (517.73) feet to the point and place of beginning. *and being the northwesterly corner of the herein conveyed piece Said premises are more particularly shown on a certain map entitled "Property of Peter Karmazyn Buckland Rd. South Windsor Connecticut W.M. Alford Civil Engineer Windsor, Conn. Scale: l;in. =40 ft. Date: Aug., 1970", which said premises will be placed on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said premises are subject to building, building line and zoning and other municipal ordinances of the Town of South Windsor. Said premises are subject to.a right of way as;of record will fully appear. A � Parcel#2 Map 38, Parcel 2 (Calvert'Church) �, All that certain piece or parcel of land, together iwith all buildings and improvements thereon, containing 36.9 lacres, more or less, situated on the northeasterly corner of (Deming ,Street and Duckland Road -in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, and more (particularly bounded and described as follows: NORTHERLY: by land now or formerly of Norman Peterson . and Peter Karmazyn, in part by each; EASTERLY: by Felt Road, so-called (formerly Creamery Road); SOUTHERLY: by Deming Street; and WESTERLY: by Ruckland Road and lancj now or formerly of Peter Karmazyn, in part by each. fSaid Premises are the same premises conveyed to ithe Grantor herein by Committee Deed (Lawrence P. Rubinow, (Committee) dated June 30, 1978 and recorded in Volume 246, (Page 209 of the South Windsor Land Records... Said premises are subject to the second half of ,taxes due on the List of October 1, 1977, which the grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay as part consideration on this deed. OWNER OF RECORD: Parcel 1 —Fred S. Katten; Parcel 2—Calvery Church of the Assemblies of God Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 9TH day of February 2004. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Co� t Timothy H Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of 19 , at South Windsor, Co ecticut TTEST: RE,,CEIVED FOR RECORD: DATE'TIME I�Q 61M. TOWN CLERK, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 1 NEW CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL - COMPARABLE ASSESSMENT AND TAX DATA Assessment Values Re. Estate Taxes Project Name Town Type #of Units Land Per Unit Building Per Unit Total Per Unit Taxes Per Unit Old Farms Crossing Avon Family 46 $308,960 $6,716.52 $1,119,340 $24,333.48 $1,428,300 $31,050.00 $40,420.89 $878.72 Whispering Pines II Avon Elderly 53 1 $294,420 $5,555.09 $1,208,840 $22,808.30 $1,503,260 $28,363.40 $42,542.26 $802.68 Orchard Ridge Berlin Elderly 120 $1,131,200 $9,426.67 $3,518,400 $29,320.00 $4,649,600 $38,746.67 $117,634.88 $980.29 Heritage Glen Farmington Family 68 $1,234,800 $18,158.82 $1,280,380 $18,829.12 $2,515,180 $36,987.94 $55,082.44 $810.04 Hunters Ridge Farmington Elderly 51 $595,350 $11,673.53 $963,650 $18,895.10 $1,559,000 $30,568.63 $34,142.10 $669.45 Westwoods Farmington Family 34 $405,720 $11,932.94 $542,440 $15,954.12 $948,160 $27,887.06 $20,764.70 $610.73 Birch Meadow Manchester Elderly 100 $440,200 $4,402.00 $5,272,000 $52,720.00 $5,712,200 $57,122.00 $195,985.00 $1,959.85 � t a Watson Farms IR'South Windsor Elderly 72 $1,374,710 $19,093.19 $1,148,000 $15,944.44 $2,522,710 $35,037.34 $75,151.53 $1,043.77 Source: Local assessors offices as compiled by R.F.Hagearty&Associates,Inc. Marcia Banach Watson Farm -South Windsor, Ct. Page 1 From: "Geoff Sager"<gsager@metro-realty.com> To: <thollister@goodwin.com> Date: 10/17/03 1:44PM Subject: Watson Farm -South Windsor, Ct. Tim, Marcia Banak, South Wndsor Town Planner(banach@southwindsor.org) has asked that I advise her on how Watson Farm qualifies under the affordable housing survey she received from DECD. Watson has 72 unit(57 affordable and 15 market rate).All are elderly. The affordable units are affordable at not more than 60% of the Hartford Area PMSA(includes 3 that are affordable @ 25%of Hartford PMSA and 6 that are affordable at 50% of Hartford PMSA). The rental rates,which are affordable for sixty or seventy years (forget which) provide the development with qualification under the first prong of 8-30(g). All units are financed by CHFA and DECD, meeting 2d prong of 8-30(g). We have long term affordability covenants recorded in the land records, copies of which I can provide to Marcia. Can you kindly answer any questions Marcia has to be sure that South Windsor gets credits for the units we developed. Needless to say, that was part of the inducement to the Town when we presented our project.Thank you. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, Connecticut 06032 (860)674 5641 (860)677-6919 gsager@metro-realty.com CC: <banach@southwindsor.org> �Qy1N Sf4 GO 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 October 20,2003 Jeri Fazzalaro,Planning Specialist Compliance Office and Planning/Progam Support Dept. of Economic and Community Development ment P 505 Hudson Street Hartford,CT 06106-7106 Dear Nis.Fazzalaro: 2003 AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPEALS LIST Enclosed please find update materials for the Town of South Windsor for the 2003 Affordable Housing Appeals List. The Town has added 57 units in a CHFA and DECD-assisted age-restricted development named Watson Farm. The units are both government-assisted and deed-restricted for 60 years. Enclosed is a copy of the deed restriction document filed on the South Windsor land records. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 860-644-2511, ext. 253,or via e-mail,banach@southwindsor.org. Sincerely, a Marcia A.Banach,AICP Director of Planning MB/sf Marcia Banach -DECD Affordable Housin survey Page 1 From: "Hollister, Timothy"<THollister@Goodwin.com> To: <banach@southwindsor.org> Date: 10/20/03 10:22AM Subject: DECD Affordable Housing survey Hi Marcia-Geoff Sager at Metro Realty has asked me to give you some input about counting the units at Watson Farm as affordable. I assume this is in response to DECD's annual survey for the purpose of compiling the ten percent list. As to Watson Fram, 57 units qualify as affordable housing under 8-30g in two ways, as"assisted housing"(because the units were financed in part with government funds)and as "deed restricted housing," because the units are subject to long-term restrictions on the maximum income and housing cost that satisfy the definitions of low and moderate income units. South Windsor cannot claim the 15 market rate units as per State Regulations Section 8-30g-2 (b)(2)(C)("If only a portion of the units in the housing are restricted to occupancy by low and moderate income persons, only the number of units so restricted shall be included on the list.") Hope this is sufficient. Please call if you have any questions. I suppose I'll see you Thursday at the Hilton. Timothy S. Hollister Shipman &Goodwin LLP One American Row Hartford, Conn. 06103-2819 860-251-5601 Fax 860-251-5699 thollister@goodwin.com http://www.shipmangoodwin.com CC: <gsager@metro-realty.com>, "Fitzgerald, Erin"<EFitzgerald@Goodwin.com> d Lwii f- Fuss&O'Neill Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Berry Patch Adult Living Community TABLE OF CONTENTS ' SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i1.0 INTRODUCTION ' 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS.......................................................................................... I 3.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC........................................................................................2 4.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC...................................................................................3 ' 5.0 ANALYSES.................................................................................................................4 5.1 Intersection Capacity Analyses........................................................................4 5.2 Intersection Sight Distance Analysis...............................................................5 ' 5.3 Accident History..............................................................................................6 6.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 6 APPENDIX A-TABLES 1. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes 2, Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary 3. Signalized Intersection Level of Service Summary 4. AM Peak Hour—Queue Length Summary 5. PM Peak Hour—Queue Length Summary 6. Intersection Accident Data Summary APPENDIX B-FIGURES 1. Site Location Map 2. 2005 Background Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M.Peak Hour 3. 2005 Background Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M.Peak Hour 4. Percent Trip Distribution Weekday A.M.Peak Hour ' 5. Percent Trip Distribution Weekday P.M.Peak Hour 6. Site Generated Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M.Peak Hour 7. Site Generated Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M.Peak Hour 8. 2005 Combined Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M.Peak Hour 9. 2005 Combined Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M.Peak Hour ' APPENDIX C Capacity Analysis Worksheets-Weekday AM Peak Hour ' APPENDIX D Capacity Analysis Worksheets-Weekday PM Peak Hour ' F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc i Fuss&O'Neill,Inc. SUMMARY SHEET As an aid to reviewers, this Summary Sheet has been included to outline the various study parameters utilized in this report. Although a full explanation of the study methodologies is included in the text of the report, this summary can serve as a useful reference for reviewers. APPLICANT: Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership SITE ACREAGE: 14 Acres± DEVELOPMENT SIZE/TYPE: 198 Units of Adult Housing APPLICATIONS: ' Town of South Windsor—Planning and Zoning Commission Site Plan Application State Traffic Commission Major Traffic Generator Certificate DESIGN YEAR: 2005 (Year construction will be completed) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH FACTOR: 1.5 %per year(Peak Hour) iTRAFFIC COUNTS: Fuss&O'Neill, Inc.-November 2001, October 2003 PEAK HOURS ANALYZED: A.M. Peak Hour-7:15 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. P.M. Peak Hour-4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION: A.M.Peak Hour-40 trips(18 enter, 22 exit) P.M. Peak Hour-44 trips(24 enter, 20 exit) CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Technique-Highway Capacity Manual(2000) Execution- Synchro Professional Software,Version 5.0 F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc it Fuss & O'Neill,Inc. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Be Patch Associates Limited Partnership has proposed the development of an additional ITY p p p p 96 units of Adult Housing on 14 acres±of property on Oakland Road(Route 30)in South Windsor Connecticut,as shown in Figure No. 1 of Appendix B. This development received approval from the Town of South Windsor for 102 housing units in July 2002. These units ' are currently under construction. The proposed expansion is anticipated to be completed in 2005 and will increase the total number of units on site to 198. Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. has been retained to study the traffic impact of the proposed expansion. This report will serve to update the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Fuss & O'Neill in December 2001. The study is being submitted to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission in support of a site plan application and to the State Traffic Commission(STC)for a Major Traffic Generator Certificate. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The 14 acre site is located on Oakland Road(Route 30)in the limited residential zone(AA-30). The site is bounded to the North by Oakland Road,and by private property to South,West,and East. The existing site has access drives to Oakland Road and Felt Road Extension. Access to the development has been approved to be located on Oakland Road(Route 30)and Felt Road Extension. The Oakland Road drive will be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only.This drive will be located approximately 630 feet west of Felt Road and 2,600 feet east of Sullivan Avenue(Route 194). The Felt Road Extension drive will be located approximately 320 feet south of Oakland Road and will provide full access. No additional site drive locations will be required to accommodate the site expansion. Oakland Road is a two-lane roadway, providing a single 13 foot wide lane with a 2 foot shoulder in each direction along the site frontage and has a posted speed limit of 40 and 35 mph in the eastbound and westbound directions respectively. Fuss&O'Neill placed an Automatic Traffic Recorder(machine tube counter)on Oakland Road in the vicinity of the proposed site from Tuesday,October 14,2003 through Thursday,October 16,2003 to record daily traffic volumes,the 85th percentile speed in each direction,and vehicle i classifications. The 24 hour daily traffic volume on Oakland Road for this time period was ■ found to be approximately 12,300 vehicles per day, including 6,400 vehicles per day in the westbound direction and 5,900 vehicles per day in the eastbound direction. The 85th percentile speeds were 44 miles per hour and 46 miles per hour respectively in the eastbound and westbound directions. To the west of the site, Oakland Road intersects with Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) and Buckland Road at a four-way signalized intersection. Sullivan Avenue is a four-lane roadway, ' which is a major route connecting Route 30 to Route 5 and Interstate 91. It has a posted speed F:\P97\97146\A76\m8v 101003tis.doc I II Fuss & O'Neill,Inc. limit of 40 miles per hour just north of Oakland Road. Buckland Road is a four-lane roadway, which provides access to numerous commercial developments, and to Interstate 84 in ' Manchester. To the east of the site, Oakland Road intersects with Felt Road and Felt Road Extension at a four-way signalized intersection. Felt Road is a two-lane roadway with 13 foot wide lanes and no shoulders, which has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour in the vicinity of Oakland Road. Felt Road provides access to numerous residential developments. Felt Road Extension is a two-lane roadway,providing a single 8 foot wide travel lane in each direction along the site frontage and has no posted speed limit.Several residential single family homes and the access drive to a gas station are located off of Felt Road Extension. Fuss & O'Neill placed a second Automatic Traffic Recorder (machine tube counter) on Felt Road Extension in the vicinity of the proposed site from November 17 —25, 2001 to record daily traffic volumes,the 85th percentile speed in each direction,and vehicle classification. The daily traffic on Felt Road Extension for this time period was found to be approximately 52 vehicles per day. The 85th percentile speed for both directions was recorded at 28 miles per hour. 3.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC In order to determine the traffic impact of the proposed development on adjacent street traffic, manual turning movement counts were performed in the vicinity of the site on Thursday, November 15,2001. These counts were compared and verified with the counts obtained from the updated ATR performed in October 2003. Other proposed or recently constructed developments in the vicinity of the site were researched through the Town of South Windsor Planning Department and the Connecticut Department of Transportation State Traffic Commission and were included in the Background traffic conditions. Traffic associated with the Evergreen Walk Development, Stop and Shop Supermarket,Watson Farms Deming Street Senior Housing,the Strawberry Fields Community, and the Terry Office Park expansion were included in the background traffic for this study. The Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning recommended a 1.5 percent per year peak hour growth factor to account for normal traffic growth in the area. The expansion of the proposed development is anticipated to be completed in 2005. The 2001 traffic counts were therefore grown 1.5 percent per year for four years, and the other nearby development traffic was added to these volumes to project the Year 2005 Background traffic volumes. The projected traffic volumes,shown in Figure Nos.2 and 3 of Appendix B,represent the 2005 Background traffic volumes, which are defined as design year traffic without the proposed development. F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 2 Fuss & O'Neill,Inc. The potential for traffic impact for this type of development on the adjacent roadway network is greatest during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, the periods when commuter traffic is at the highest levels. The traffic counts indicate that the morning peak hour for the Oakland Road area .is 7:15 to 8:15 A.M., and the afternoon peak hour is 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. Therefore, these peak hours were analyzed for impacts. 4.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ' Fuss & O'Neill has contacted the Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) Bureau of Planning to discuss the trip generation rate for this development. The Bureau of Planning stated that based on an age restriction of 55 years and older for these housing units, they have historically supported trip generation rates of.20 and .22 trips per unit during the A.M. and P.M.peak hours respectively. A comparison of these rates to Industry Standards was made using the 1997 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication "Trip Generation". This publication provides a compilation of trip generation data for similar elderly housing facilities and data for entering and exiting traffic,relative to the number of housing units. Several land uses within the trip generation manual were reviewed for applicability to the proposed development. Given that the housing will be restricted to older residents, the most appropriate land use is ITE Land Use Code 250;Retirement Community. The manual describes the data for this land use as applicable to the following:"...developments restricted to adults or senior citizens which contain residential units similar to apartments or condominiums,and are usually self contained villages." It was our findingthat the ITE rates were very similar to the rates accepted b the ConnDOT rY p Y Bureau of Planning and therefore we used the ConnDOT rates to project site generated traffic. Using the total 198 proposed units, the ConnDOT rate yields the number of vehicle trips that can be expected to enter and exit the site during peak hours. These trip generation volumes are summarized in Table No. 1 of Appendix A. As shown in Table No. 1, this development is expected to generate a total of 40 trips(18 entering,22 exiting)during the AM peak hour,and 44 trips (24 entering, 20 exiting) during the PM peak hour. This represents an increase in 20 trips(9 entering, I I exiting)during the morning peak hour and 22 trips(12 entering, 10 exiting) during the afternoon peak hour versus the trips generated from the 102 units approved by the Town in 2001. The distribution of site generated traffic traveling to and from the proposed site, shown in Figure Nos.4 and 5 of Appendix B was developed based on the patterns of the residential traffic on the adjacent roadway network, and proximity to major highways in the area. Using the percent distribution,the site generated traffic was added to the roadway system with the results shown in Figure Nos.6 and 7 of Appendix B. These volumes were then added to the FAP97\9714"76\mgv101003tis.doc 3 Fuss& O'Neill,Inc. Background volumes to yield the 2005 Combined Peak Hour traffic volumes shown in Fib Nos. 8 and 9 of Appendix B. 5.0 ANALYSES 5.1 Intersection Capacity Analyses In discussing intersection capacity analyses, two terms are used to describe the operating condition of the road or intersection. These two terms are volume to capacity ratio (v/c), and level of service(LOS). The v/c ratio is a ratio of the volume of traffic using an intersection to the total capacity of the intersection(the maximum number of vehicles that can utilize the intersection during an hour). The v/c ratio can be used to describe the percentage of capacity utilized by a single intersection movement,a combination of movements,an entire intersection approach,or the intersection as a whole. As the v/c ratio approaches 1, the intersection nears capacity and it may become impossible to accommodate all the vehicles attempting to travel through the intersection. LOS is a measure of the delay experienced by stopped vehicles at an intersection. Signalized intersection LOS is rated on a scale from A to F, with A describing a condition of very low delay(less than 10 seconds per vehicle),and F describing a condition where delays will exceed 80 seconds per vehicle. Delay is described as a measure of driver discomfort,frustration,fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Therefore, intersections with longer delay times are less acceptable to most drivers. tLOS is generally used to describe the operation (based on delay time) of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, while We ratio is applied to signalized intersections only. These definitions for v/c ratio and LOS, as well as the methodology for conducting signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses, are taken from the "2000 Highway Capacity Manual"(Special Report No. 209),published by the Transportation Research Board. Using the above referenced signalized methodologies, A.M. and P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were conducted at the following intersections: 1. Oakland Road(Route 30) at Felt Road Extension 2. Oakland Road(Route 30) at Sullivan Avenue(Route 194)Buckland Road In discussing unsignalized intersection capacity analyses,the term"level of service"(LOS)is used to provide a description of the delay and operational characteristics of the turns from the minor street (stop sign controlled) to the major street, and turns from the major street to the minor street. Through vehicles are not delayed by the minor street and do not experience delay, and,therefore, are not rated with a level of service.Unsignalized intersection LOS is rated on a scale from A to F, with A describing a condition of very low delay(less than 10 seconds per vehicle), and F describing a condition where delays will exceed 50 seconds per vehicle. F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 4 Fuss& O'Neill,Inc. Usingthe above referenced unsignahzed methodologies, A.M. and P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were conducted at the following intersections: 1. Felt Road Extension at Berry Patch East Site Drive 2. Oakland Road at Berry Patch North Site Drive Tables No. 2 and No. 3 of Annendix A presents a summary of the levels of service at these intersections for both Background and Combined conditions traffic volumes. Copies of the analysis worksheets can be found in Appendices C and D. a 1 Our determination of the traffic impact from the proposed development was made through a comparison of the Background LOS(without the proposed elderly housing development)versus the Combined conditions(with the proposed elderly housing development). As shown in Table No. 2 the intersection of East Site Drive approach to Felt Road extension will operate efficiently at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. The North Site Drive right turn lane approach to Oakland Road will also operate effectively at LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS C during the PM peak hour. As shown in Table No.3,the intersection of Oakland Road and Buckland Road operates at LOS C and F during the AM and PM peak hour Background conditions respectively. The LOS at the intersection of Oakland Road at Buckland Road/Sullivan Avenue does not change during the Combined conditions after the site generated traffic is added to the Background traffic for both the AM and PM Peak Hours. The overall increase in intersection delay is negligible during the morning peak hour and only one second during the afternoon peak hour. The intersection of Oakland Road at Felt Road Extension will continue to operate efficiently at LOS A during both the AM and PM Peak Hours under the Combined conditions. We therefore conclude that the additional site generated traffic from this development will not significantly impact the capacity of the intersections analyzed. 5.2 Intersection Sight Distance Analysis Intersection sight distances for the proposed site driveway intersections on Felt Road Extension and Oakland Road were measured in accordance with ConnDOT guidelines. Upon field investigation, the proposed east site driveway can provide approximately 320 feet of sight distance to the north (left) and 230 feet to the south (right). In order to achieve these sight distances,the clearing of trees,brush,and vegetation will be required along the site frontage on Felt Road Extension. Additionally,Felt Road Extension will be widened along the site frontage to improve access, and the site drive will be raised higher than the existing access to improve sight distance. The proposed north site drive will provide approximately 900 feet of sight distance to the west(left) and 900 feet to the east (right). As previously noted,the 85th percentile speed measured by Fuss&O'Neill was found to be 28 mph in each direction on Felt Road Extension in front of the site. The ConnDOT minimum required sight distance is 265 feet in both directions for this design speed. To the right of the ' F:\M\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 5 Fuss & O'Neill Inc. site drive the.road dead ends at 230 feet, thus there is sufficient sight distance. To the left (north) of the site drive, Felt Road Extension intersects Oakland Road at 320 feet from the intersection. Therefore,after improvements have been made to clear vegetation,the driver will be able to see the entire length of the Felt Road Extension from the site drive. On Oakland Road,the 85th percentile speeds measured by Fuss&O'Neill were found to be 44 miles per hour and 46 miles per hour respectively in the eastbound and westbound directions in front of the site. The ConnDOT minimum required sight distance is 427 feet and 478 feet respectively looking in both left and right for these design speeds. Therefore, the North Site Drive meets the ConnDOT criteria for the 85th percentile speed,and will provide ample sight distance. 5.3 Accident History iAccident data was compiled from the Connecticut Department of Transportation(ConnDOT) for the Oakland Road (State Route 30) at Felt Road intersection and the Oakland Road at Sullivan Avenue (State Route 194) intersection for the period of January 1, 1999 through September 30,2002. The Oakland Road at Felt Road intersection is not on the ConnDOT Suggested List of Surveillance Study Sites (SLOSSS) for the years 1998-2000. The Oakland Road at Sullivan Avenue intersection is included on the SLOSSS list. The SLOSSS lists intersections and roadway segments in the State of Connecticut with a higher than normal accident rate. Within the time frame compiled, there were an average of 15 accidents per year at the intersection of Oakland Road and Buckland Road/Sullivan Avenue. Also within the time frame analyzed,there were an average of 7 accidents per year at the intersection of Oakland Road and Felt Road. A summary of accident data can be found in Table No. 6 of Appendix A. Of the accidents reported, nearly half were rear-end collisions, which are common at traffic signals. Nearly 30 percent of the accidents were turn related collisions. It should be noted that several improvements have been made to the signal at Oakland Road, Buckland Street,and Sullivan Avenue in 2002. These improvements include timing revisions, revised pavement markings and lane use on the westbound approach,and the removal of signal coordination. These modifications have improved operations at this intersection. he limited increase in traffic generated by the proposed Adult Housing Community is not expecte ausz any-appreciable change in accident frequencies in the study area. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The purpose of preparing a Traffic Impact study is to identify the impact of the proposed development's site generated traffic. The proposed Adult Housing Community expansion is projected to-generate an additional 20 trips during the AM peak hour, and 22 trips during the F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 6 Fuss &O'Neill,Inc. PM peak hour. As determined by our analysis,these trips can be serviced b available roadway Y capacity of the adjacent roadway network. Adequate sight distance will be provided from the proposed drives. All intersections considered by this statement will not experience a significant increase in vehicle delay with the addition of the site generated traffic. The small amount of traffic that will be added on Oakland Road will not pose safety concerns within the study area. It is recommended that existing trees,brush,and other vegetation be cleared along the Felt Road site frontage to ensure adequate sight lines. The Felt Road Extension site drive vertical alignment will be raised higher than the existing access to improve sight distance. Also,Felt Road Extension will be widened along the site frontage to improve access. Based on the foregoing study and the recommendations outlined above, it is the professional opinion of Fuss&O'Neill that the expanded Berry Patch Adult Housing Community will not have a significant impact on the traffic operations in the vicinity of the site. F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 7 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. APPENDIX A . BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY TABLES F:\P97V7146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc .rr M an M Ww me to M No Am 0-0an M 1w s am Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE 2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Berry Patch Adult Living Community South Windsor, Connecticut 2005 AM 2005 PM STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS* PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR (Critical Movements) Background Combined Background Combined Oakland Road (Rt. 30) at North Site Drive North Site Drive Northbound approach NA B NA C Felt Road Ext. at East Site Drive East Site Drive Eastbound approach NA A NA A *Values indicated are critical movement Level of Service (LOS) F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE 3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY South Windsor, Connecticut 2005 AM 2005 PM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS* PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR Background Combined Background Combined Oakland Road (Rt. 30) at Sullivan Avenue (Rt. 194) C C F F Oakland Road (Rt. 30) at Felt Road/Felt Road Extension A A A A *Values indicated are overall intersection LOS F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc ft M M w M � Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE 4 AM PEAK HOUR 951h PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTH SUMMARY BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY South Windsor, Connecticut 2005 2005 Available Intersection Approach Lane Background Queue Combined Queue Turn Lane Storage Feet (Feet) Feet Oakland Road(Rt. 30) NB Left 25 25 185 At Sullivan Avenue(Rt. 194) NB Thru 125 125 SB Left 75 75 330 SB Thru 400 400 EB Left 75 75 275 EB Thru 75 75 WB Left 50 50 260 WB Thru 250 275 WB Right 50 50 350 Oakland Road(Rt. 30) NB 25 50 At Felt Road SB 100 100 EB 100 100 WB 150 175 NOTE: Values indicated are rounded to the nearest car length(25 feet) F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doe f M w w 4" Na Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE 5 PM PEAK HOUR 95'h PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTH SUMMARY BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY South Windsor, Connecticut 2005 2005 Available Intersection Approach Lane Background Queue Combined Queue Turn Lane Storage Feet Feet Feet Oakland Road(Rt. 30) NB Left 50 50 185 At Sullivan Avenue(Rt. 194) NB Thru 700 700 SB Left 350 350 330 SB Thru 300 300 EB Left 500 500 275 EB Thru 225 225 WB Left 75 75 260 WB Thru 225 225 WB Right 125 125 350 Oakland Road(Rt. 30) NB 50 50 At Felt Road SB 75 75 EB 275 275 WB 150 150 NOTE: Values indicated are rounded to the nearest car length(25 feet) F:\P97\97146W 76\mgv101003tis.doc W M OW " Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE 6 INTERSECTION ACCIDENT DATA SUMMARY BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY South Windsor, Connecticut ACCIDENTS PER YEAR* INTERSECTIONS/ROAD SEGMENTS Year Year Year Year** Average/ 1999 2000 2001 2002 Full Year S.R. 30 (Oakland Rd/Ellington Rd) and 16 16 13 9 15 S.R. 194 (Sullivan Ave/Buckland Rd) S.R. 30 (Oakland Rd)Between 2 1 3 0 2 S.R. 194 and Felt Rd S.R. 30 (Oakland Rd) and Felt Rd 9 4 7 1 7 *Values indicated are number of accidents within 200 feet of each intersection during time period shown. Data provided by the Connecticut Department of Transportation. **Year 2002 data contains records through September 30, 2002. F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc Fuss&O'Neill Inc. APPENDIX B BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY FIGURES F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc L1N01 ON A m �� � uR�Rf 74 0 a Mli ROAD � 3 BREE2Y _ti p 4� Q p�Fi South Windsor DEERFIEto TA44W ti y LA. �c 19 4 o Rid RipGEF1ELD f s� ROAD o OAK,ANO 30 of o Aca�Ncm FARM O POOH yOP 3c 20� H OR W (qNf 4 MOHfGAM BAYBERRY 4� o � T m pfM1TyG iEw SITE LOCATION w h N O � 4 �O O h STREET DEMING w p50R N OF 50F 1MPNOHESSER w ZpW SOWN p v 1000 0 1000 SCALE: 1 " = 1000' MAP REFERENCE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM THE FOLLOWING 1999 FIGURE 1 CONN. DOT CARTOGRAPHIC/TRANSPORTATION DATA CD—ROM—SOUTH WINDSOR AND MANCHESTER. a ADPh FIM & 07'4FH, INC.Consulting Engineers J 146 HARTFORD ROAD.MANCHESTER,CONNECTICUi 06040 (L (660) 646-2469 of U SITE LOCATION MAP BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY Ln aSOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT a a PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:1"= 1000' /yy1 TV VJ z T' p f— > W O J LL.I Z) Li X O � Q to to j L-190 1 '-15 *o� 4-303 4-564 00 00 r' 4-483 4-512 ELLINGTON ROAD 41 1 �►�"71 OAKLAND ROAD ROUTE 30 41 1 4f--14 103--+*l ? r* 317--► 11-t 4I t 1* 377-* 309—► 145—► 'o �10 N 294 -► 283-► z t 0z t O M z Q J U Q Z) O m x z O V) z Ld 1-- X L LI J Q l�J O L` x FIGURE 2 0 JI R FUSS MULL INC.c. at,E+�. 146 MAK"RO ROAD MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 00040 CL (660) 646-2469 N BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY 3 2005 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT PROJ. NO.:97145 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:NITS an am on INK%' go to sm an OR ow Am ow SO *m" Cn z � o > Iw— LL O J .. � W Li O te(n 04 0 0 O_ 100 t--253 t-72 ,,N *--213 t-552 I 4-486 f-558 ELLINGTON ROAD .j 1 �r-86 OAKLAND ROAD ROUTE 30) L►r"15 479 t I+ 824---► 102--+ t 790-► 1033-► 445-► ^P 802-+ 697--o- o W) 109-i 3 1 I M O^ r z Q J U Q O m � z O z w x w J Q w O FIGURE 3 � FUSS dt ONEU INC.C..dtiny Eng{ncvrs 146 HARTFORD ROAD MANCHESTER,CONNECTICUT 06049 d (860) 646-2469 In BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY 3 2005 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PROJ, NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:NTS d.. Cn r- > f— LL1 O J Lj = li IY O � Q � r a. ^ 1� + 15 f—�227;2)4—(43%) I be 4-- 4-49% ELLINGTON ROAD .� 1 �►r6%) OAKLAND ROAD f"(437) ROUTE 30 .j 1 Lo.i-49% 16%—► 16%—► N 34% (26%)--► (25%)—► Z (o Mv� n � 8^\° 1 S I TE .-66% 'to '1 r Y � Z :) O r 00 OC Z O Z Ld f— x Ld o Q uj O L` FIGURE 4 IN- r FUSS & O'NF.QL INC.Con6ulti+� 0040 146 HARTFORO ROAD,MANCHESMR,CONNECTICUT 8040 0_ (660)646-2459 N BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY PERCENT DISTRIBUTION WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT . u- -J PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:NTS an .1m owl am lion Q F' 0 > H w ¢O J W :D LL x > O cn ¢ ry t (,8% t � �- 15%�f-(38%) 4-- 4-40% ELLINGTON ROAD .� 1 4►i4—*5%)r► OAKLAND ROAD �-3a% ROUTE 30 .J 1 L►4�,4♦0% - I I I 53%-► -► (i (2%)-� I I F" (557.)-► 47%-+ 47%-► N 53%� (27%)-i (25%)--► ro - vt v x M 04 v 1 SITE4-47% 41 � Y � � D O t m CC Z O V) Z w x w w O u— cr— FIGURE 5 I"HA"FORO ROAO MANCHESTER.CONNECTICVF 05040 L't 1860)646-2469 N BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY PERCENT DISTRIBUTION 4) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:NTS d- rn 0 > FLLI - I J O J W ::) LL- x O � Q � 4-9ELLINGTON ROAD �—(s) OAKLAND ROAD .—(9) ROUTE 30 .1 1 L► �9 41 1 I FP' �6 6 �� �_ I 3-► 3 �12)-► (6)-i (6)-► rn v m Z --31 .. I t N I N 4--12 1 Q SITE 16 �.�, ? J (16)-► ( ) � o • U ¢ 0 m ry z 0 0 z Ld F- x Lv � ca w o u- x FIGURE 6 om «° FUSS & ONEEL INC,co.=cti y a ws 146 HARTFORD ROAD,MAN;HESTER,CONNECRCUT 06040 EN TER: 13 i c660,646-2469 EXIT.: (22) BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY TOTAL: 40 3 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES E WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE:NTS o Qw on ow! on T�T Ld VI > I-.- W O J W 0 u- c' O VV)) 4 1 i(4 1 � *-(3� 4-(8) 4- 4-10 ELLINGTON ROAD .-I 1 L►4(') OAKLAND ROAD •—(6) ROUTE 30 4J 1 L►f10 -? I t �► 13-► 13� r► ��) t F" (11) -► T t r to 1 z SITE ~" `' 1 (15)-► (15)-S T Y � U Q Z) O m tr z O Z LI.J I— X Ld Q UJ O LL- x FIGURE 7 FUSS aNEML a i..>r. d 7 146 WIMMM Ra.M 8448BCON ECTICUT 00040 ENTER: 24 �; EXIT.: (20) BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY TOTAL: 44 # SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES N WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR E OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE.OCT. 2003 SCAMNTS pw, Nam "a 0* 4w PM me ow' ow low' dw am *or 4 l d- rn > Ld W QO J Lv L- C:' O V) Q c0 h N_ c0 1 +-193 L15 o 4-308 4-573 4-483 4-521 ELLINGTON ROAD 4J 1 L►f- OAKLAND ROAD 4-585 ROUTE 30 41 j L. F23 103--+'41 1 r* 323-l- 300-i �► 11�* t F' 389--► 312-► 1 68-► a n - 6 co 300-► 289-► �tO n 0-� ♦ I 1toco 1 N M SITE ~12 '�� J 16-► 16 t U Q :D O m f.)= ' Z O V) Z Ld h-- X Ld Q Lw FIGURE 8 'M & CNER.L INC.Consulting Engineers 146 HAATFORD ROAD MANCHEST'ER, CONNECTICVT 06040 a. (860) 646-2469 N BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY 3 2005 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES E WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT �� g PROJ, NO.;97146 A76 DATE;OCT. 2003 SCALE;NTS WWI Ill". a � { d- rn > Ld W 40 J Lj Z) LL Q� O (n Q . N _O O_ '- ,.a, L257 72 c'1 n N f-216 4-560 a a,C) *-486 �-583 ELLINGTON ROAD ..1 1 �►f- OAKLAND ROAD .-553 ROUTE 30 4j 1 L,r25 479 -41 1 f* 837--► 807--► r► 102---+" t F' 802-► 1044-► 109--* n M 13-i 807-o. 702-* Z 3 T t t 00 1 M SITE �z t 15--► 15--+ Y O Z U Q � O m � z O U) z Ld F— x Lv w O Ll cl� FIGURE 9 JG&O FUSS & aN EU INC.cm at, ,rno . 148 HARTFORD ROAD, MANCHESTER,CONNECTICUT 06040 a. (860) 646-2469 to BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY 3 2005 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR OAKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PROJ. NO.:97146 A76 DATE:OCT. 2003 SCALE;NTS Fuss&O'Neill Inc. APPENDIX C ' BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 1 ,, F:XP97197146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry'Patch Adult Housing ' 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations , ' Lane Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 161 161 177 177 -6 -6 -6 -6 ' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Frt 0.996 0.900 0.927 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1990 0 0 1994 0 0 1416 0 0 1749 0 ' Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1946 0 0 1970 0 0 1385 0 0 1549 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 4 32 87 ' Link Speed (mph) 30 40 30 30 Travel Time(s) 48.2 10.9 9.4 26.9 OREM ' Confl. Peds.`(#/hr) ' Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 2% ' Parking (#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) 13 337 0 17 575 18 5 6 32 80 10 106 IMMEEM-_ EMEMEM Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ' Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Minimum Initial (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 Maximum Green (s) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 ' All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead-Lag Optimize? - MENNEEM Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 . 1.5 1.5 ' G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Walk Time(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 MMMMM Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 79 152 23 79 ' 50th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft) ' 95th Bay Block Time%° will Cycle Length: 70 ' Natural Cycle:40 ' Splits and Phases: 6: Oakland Rd. &Felt Rd. o2 �" o4 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 2 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing ' 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour # Lane Configurations , ' Lane Width 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 ' Frt 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.93 Satd. Flow(prot) 1990 1993 1416 1749 Satd. Flow(perm) 1949 1972 1383 1513 ' Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 350 0 0 610 0 0 43 0 0 196 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 ' Effective Green, g (s) 32.4 32.4 8.1 8.1 Clearance Time(s) - 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1276 1291 226 248 ' v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.31 0.03 c0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 3.6 4.3 17.9 19.9 Incremental Delay,d2 0.1 0.3 0.1 14.7 ' Level of Service A A B C Approach LOS A A B C ' HCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service A Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.5 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 c Critical Lane Group ' G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour ' Lane Configurations V1 tT I t F tT+ I tT NMI Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 260 350 185 0 330 0 Total Lost Time(s) 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 4.8 4.8 3.5 4.8 4.8 Trailing Detector(ft) -6 282 -6 292 0 -10 -10 -10 -10 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 ' Frt 0.956 0.850 0.993 0.994 Satd. Flow(prot) 1656 3166 0 1703 1792 1524 1704 3384 0 1718 3416 0 ' Satd. Flow(perm) 495 3166 0 1052 1792 1524 235 3384 0 760 3416 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 221 7 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40 40 Travel Time (s) 4.5 9.0 41.2 10.1 ' Confl. Peds. #/hr Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% Parking Adj. Flow(vph) 120 169 71 83 352 221 50 401 19 181 1234 51 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt e� _= ' Permitted Phases6 2 2 4 8 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 r Total Split(s) 8.5 25.0 0.0 8.5 25.0 25.0 8.5 0.0 34.1 0.0 12.4 38.0 Maximum Green(s) 5.0 20.2 5.0 20.2 Nh20.2 5.0 28.4� 8.9 32.3 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.8 0.5 1.8 Minimum Gap(s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 - 5.0 1.5 2 0 1.5 2.0 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 4 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Walk Time(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Queue Length 95th(ft) 72 76 53 #248 44 25 107 73 #385 ' 50th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 260 350 185 330 I HIM IN 95th Bay Block Time% 4% 13% Cycle Length:80 ' Natural Cycle:80 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 9: Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. 01 m2 m3 m4 +i{ o5 6 e7 08 G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 5 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour ' Lane Configurations t'T ►� , � , Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 2% MENEM Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ' Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fit Permitted 0.32 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.42 1.00 Volume(vph) 103 145 61 71 303 190 43 345 16 156 1061 44 ZI Adj. Flow(vph) 120 169 71 83 352 221 50 401 19 181 1234 51 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 18.7 22.4 18.7 18.7 26.8 24.2 33.6 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.41 0.36 0.51 0.41 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 5.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.01 0.12 c0.03 c0.38 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.27 0.21 0.70 0.52 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.93 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Delay(s) 17.7 20.0 16.2 28.2 23.4 15.0 16.6 9.8 30.2 Approach Delay(s) 19.2 25.1 16.4 27.7 17 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.1% ICU Level of Service i a C -_ _ G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 ' 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations ,+ Lane Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 161 161 177 177 -6 -6 -6 -6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.914 0.928 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1990 0 0 1992 0 0 1430 0 0 1751 0 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1946 0 0 1950 0 0 1340 0 0 1543 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 3 39 85 Link Speed (mph) 30 40 30 30 Travel Time(s) 14.2 10.9 6.7 26.9 Confl.Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 12% 12% 12%° 2% 2% 2% Parking (#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) 13 344 0 27 575 18 15 7 39 80 13 106 I Mill Bill Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm all Permitted Phases 2 2 - 4 4 Si 1:11 Minimum Initial (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split(s) 44.0 44.0 0.0 44.0 44.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 032 Maximum Green (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead Lag Optimize? Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing ' 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Milli ME Walk Time (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 83 160 30 80 50th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length(ft) 95th Bay Block Time% Cycle Length: 70 Natural Cycle:40 Splits and Phases: 6: Oakland Rd. &Felt Rd. m2 m4 G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Page 2 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations 4* 4 ' Lane Width 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 ' Frt 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.93 Satd. Flow(prot) 1990 1992 1429 1751 injim Satd. Flow(perm) 1949 1953 1326 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 IN Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 357 0 0 620 0 0 61 0 0 199 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Effective Green,g (s) 32.4 32.4 8.2 8.2 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1273 1276 219 249 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.32 0.05 c0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 3.7 4.4 18.1 19.9 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.3 15.3 Level of Service A A B D HIM! ill! 1 ;11 lillill Approach LOS A A B D HCM Average Control Delay 10.0 HCM Level of Service A Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.6 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 All S,_ _ 1 , ! c Critical Lane Group G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 260 350 185 0 330 0 Total Lost Time(s) 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 4.8 4.8 3.5 4.8 4.8 Trailing Detector(ft) -6 282 -6 292 0 -10 -10 -10 -10 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.956 0.850 0.993 0.994 Satd. Flow(prot) 1656 3166 0 1703 1792 1524 1704 3384 0 1718 3416 0 jl ill 01 Said. Flow(perm) 478 3166 0 1041 1792 1524 235 3384 0 760 3416 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 224 7 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40 40 Travel Time(s) 4.5 9.0 41.2 10.1 Confl. Peds. #/hr Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 70 4% 4% 4% Parking (#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) 120 172 71 84 358 224 50 401 19 185 1234 51 Turn Type pm+pt pni Perm m+c P t m+ t p P P Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 8 Minimum Initial (s) 5.6 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Total Split(s) 8.5 25.0 0.0 8.5 25.0 25.0 8.5 34.1 0.0 12.4 38.0 0.0 Maximum Green (s) 5.0 20.2 5.0 20.2 20.2 5.0 28.4 8.9 32.3 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.8 0.5 1.8 Lead-Lag Optimize? � Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 4 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions } Weekday AM Peak Hour Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Walk Time(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Queue Length 95th(ft) 72 77 54 #266 44 25 107 75 #385 MM 50th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 260 350 185 330 95th Bay Block Time% 7% 13% Cycle Length: 80 IBM-i- Natural Cycle: 75 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 9: Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. } A o2 03 # o4 05 06 o7 o8 r G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Page 5 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd . & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations I +T+ Grade(%) 0% 0% -2% 2% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.31 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.42 1.00 Volume(vph) 103 148 61 72 308 193 43 345 16 159 1061 44 Adj. Flow(vph) 120 172 71 84 358 224 50 401 19 185 1234 51 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 18.7 22.4 18.7 18.7 26.7 24.1 33.7 27.6 tActuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.41 0.36 0.51 0.41 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 5.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.01 0.12 c0.03 c0.38 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.27 0.21 0.71 0.53 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.93 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay(s) 17.7 20.1 16.3 28.7 23.6 15.0 16.6 9.8 30.2 Approach Delay(s) 19.3 25.4 16.5 27.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.4% ICU Level of Service C G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Ped Bike Factor Fit Protected Fit Permitted Headway Factor 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance(ft) 1496 625 424 Volume(vph) 300 6 0 585 0 6 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Group Flow(vph) 333 0 0 636 0 7 10 12 Control Type: Unsignalized G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 7 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Grade 3% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 333 965 329 tC,2 stage (s)- p0 queue free% 100 100 99 fVolume Left 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 712 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 1 Lane LOS B Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.1 i G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 8 FUSSONMANC-FF51 16: East Site Drive & Felt Road Extension Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour __A 4% t Lane Configurations Y , Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Ped Bike Factor Fit Protected 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance(ft) 345 237 293 Volume(vph) 16 0 0 3 3 12 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Bus )#/hr Blockages 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ( Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Group Flow(vph) 23 0 0 4 21 0 Control Type: Unsignalized G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 9 FUSSONMANC-FF51 16: East Site Drive & Felt Road Extension Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations , Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 17 13 21 tC,2 stage (s) MINEMENNINEEM p0 queue free % 98 100 100 Volume Left 23 0 0 cSH 1001 1594 1700 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 0 Lane LOS A Approach LOS A Average Delay 4.1 ' Ye G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined AM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 10 FUSSONMANC-FF51 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. APPENDIX D BERRY PATCH ADULT LIVING COMMUNITY CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR F:\P97\97146\A76\mgv101003tis.doc 6: Oakl and Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations 4+ Lane Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 TrailingMetec:Mor(ft) 161 161 W77 177 -6 -6 -6 -6 - t Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.994 0.999 0.988 0.975 Fit Permitted 0.856 0.976 0.913 0.847 Mighturn on RedYes Yes Yes Tes Headway Factor"-" 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.96 0.96 0.96 Link Distance(ft) 2121 637 413 1184 Volume (vph) 102 697 3 15 486 72 17 10 43 50 8 42 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1%. 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Lane Group Flow(vph) -0 853 0 0 622 0 0 98 �0 0 117 Q Protected Phases 2 2 4 4 Detector Phases 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 Minimum Split(s} 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split(%) 76% 76% 0% 76% 76% 0% 24% 24% 0% 24% 24% 0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lead/Lag Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Walk Time(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) y� . 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft} 271 � 135 A � 36 65 50th Up Block Time(%) rurn Mayength (ft) G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour -► fir ' ' - 4% t / . 1w �► 95th Bay Block Time% Cycle Length:70 Natural Cycle: 50 Splits and Phases: 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. 02 04 G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 2 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Lane Width 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.92 0.94 Satd. Flow(prot) 2117 2125 1591 1807 Satd. Flow(perm) 1827 2077 1457 1484 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 853 0 0 622 0 0 98 0 0 117 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.9 52.9 8.0 8.0 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1383 1572 167 170 v/s Ratio Perm c0.47 0.30 0.07 c0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 3.9 �3.0 29.4 29.8 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 �0.2 3.4 8.9 Level of Service A A C D NEWS j Approach LOS A A pP C D HCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service A Actuated Cycle Length (s) 69.9 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 c Critical Lane Group G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Grade(%} 0% 0% -2% 2% ' - Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Leading Detector(ft) 28 290 28 300 50 20 20 20 20 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Frt 0.970 0.850 0.987 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3433 0 1719 1810 1538 1753 3460 0 1718 3436 0 (perm)Flow Satd.d (p ) 546 3433 0 736 1810 1538 369 3460 0 199 3436 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 201 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 40 40 Travel Time(s) 4.5 9.0 41.2 10.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 on Adj. Flow(vph) 557 517 127 100 248 294 87 1267 122 295 832 2 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt rp _ Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 8 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Total Split(s) 23.0 36.3 0.0 10.7 24.0 24.0 13.0 38.0 0.0 15.0 40.0 0.0 I MUM Maximum Green (s) 19.5 31.5 7.2 19.2 19.2 9.5 32.3 11.5 34.3 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.8 0.5 1.8 Lead-Lag Optimize? IN I : t_ _ - 3 Recall Mode None Min None Min Min None None None None Queue Length 95th (ft) #503 223 67 220 125 55 #707 #332 304 50th Up Block Time(%) 51% 25% Turn Bay Length(ft) 275 260 350 185 330 �-.-- 95th Bay Block Time% 54% 58% 7% G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 4 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 100 Natural Cycle: 100 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 9:Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. 01 o2 o3 I*tM ' 05 06 o7 08 G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 5 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Grade(%) 0% 0% -2% 2% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.10 1.00 Volume(vph) 479 445 109 86 213 253 79 1153 111 268 757 2 OEM Adj. Flow(vph) 557 517 127 100 248 294 87 1267 122 295 832 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.7 31.6 23.3 17.7 17.7 38.8 33.0 MM 48.0 38.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.33 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.34 0.51 0.40 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 5.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.19 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.40 c0.13 0.24 v/c Ratio 1.21 0.57 0.42 0.73 1.02 0.32 1.18 1.08 0.61 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay(s) 135.6 28.7 30.2 47.5 98.8 18.7 120.6 108.0 24.2 Approach Delay(s) 78.3 68.3 114.6 46.1 MMEMEM HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.1% ICU Level of Service G G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Background PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations , , , Lane Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 161 161 177 177 -6 -6 -6 -6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Elm Fit Protected 0.994 0.998 0.985 0.976 Fit Permitted 0.854 0.952 0.898 0.839 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.96 0.96 0.96 Link Distance(ft) 561 637 229 1184 Volume(vph) 102 702 3 25 486 72 25 11 49 50 9 42 Heavy Vehicles (%} 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 859 0 0 633 0 0 118 0 0 119 0 Protected Phases 2 2 4 4 Detector Phases 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 Minimum Split(s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split(%) 74% 74% 0% 74% 74% 0% 26% 26% 0% 26% 26% 0% lip Yellow Times t 3.0 3.0( ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lead/Lag Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Walk Time(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) S0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 281 144 42 66 - - RON 50th Up Block Time(%) d •-:' ..,' .a-��"7°`I i" .. i5 � €�� Turn Bay Length(ft) G:\P97\97146W76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour 95th Bay Block Time% Cycle Length:70 Natural Cycle: 50 Split s s and Phases: 6: Oakland Rd. &Felt Rd. m2 A G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 2 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour -- 4N t Lane Configurations Lane Width 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.92 0.94 Satd. Flow(prot) 2118 2124 1596 1809 Satd. Flow(perm) 1828 2030 1408 1440 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 859 0 0 633 0 0 118 0 0 119 0 jil Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Effective Green, g (s) 47.9 47.9 7.3 7.3 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1364 1515 160 164 v/s Ratio Perm c0.47 0.31 c0.08 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 3.9 3.0 27.5 27.5 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.2 14.1 12.6 Level of Service A A D D Approach LOS A A D D HCM Average Control Delay 9.2 HCM Level of Service A MIAMIMAINE Actuated Cycle Length(s) 64.2 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 c Critical Lane Group G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations '� �► '� �► Grade(%) 0% 0% -2% 2% �I Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Leading Detector(ft) 28 290 28 300 50 20 20 20 20 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Frt 0.971 0.850 0.987 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3437 0 1719 1810 1538 1753 3460 0 1718 3436 0 Satd. Flow(perm) 536 3437 0 727 1810 1538 369 3460 0 199 3436 0 ENEENNEWE ,. Satd. Flow(RTOR) 201 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40 40 Traver Time(s) 4.5 9.0 41.2 10.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Ad'. Flow v h 557 530 127 101 251 299 8 1 ( P ) 7 1267 123 296 832 2 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 8 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Total Split(s) 23.0 36.3 0.0 10.7 24.0 24.0 13.0 38.0 0.0 15.0 40.0 0.0 Maximum Greens 19.5 31.5 7.2 19.2 19.2 9.5 32.3( ) 11.5 34.3 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.8 0.5 1.8 Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None Min None Min Min None None None None Queue Length 95th (ft) #506 228 67 223 130 55 #708 #332 304 50th Up Block Time(%) 52% 25% Turn Bay Length(ft) 275 260 350 185 330 � e R 95th Bay Block Time% 55% 58% 7% G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 4 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 100 Y 9 Natural Cycle: 100 -- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 9: Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. 01 1 V o2 o3 M '(' 05 06 o7 o8 GAP97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 5 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour IQ t Lane Configurations + �► Grade(%} 0% 0% -2% 2% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.10 1.00 Volume(vph) 479 456 109 87 216 257 79 1153 112 269 757 2 Adj. Flow(vph) 557 530 127 101 251 299 87 1267 123 296 832 2 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicles(/o) 2/0 2/0 2/0 5/0 5/0 5/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 4/o Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 31.9 23.6 18.0 18.0 38.8 33.0 48.0 38.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.33 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.34 0.50 0.40 MENEM Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 5.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.19 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.40 c0.13 0.24 v/c Ratio 1.21 0.58 0.42 0.73 1.02 0.33 1.18 1.09 0.61 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay(s) 136.6 28.8 30.2 47.1 99.3 18.8 122.8 110.6 24.4 Approach Delay(s) 78.2 68.4 116.7 47.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.4% ICU Level of Service G G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Grade(%) 3% 0% 0% Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected Fit Permitted Headway Factor 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance(ft) 1560 561 447 Volume(vph) 807 13 0 553 0 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 877 14 0 601 0 5 ROME Sign Control Free Free Stop Area Type: Other G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 7 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + Grade 3% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 EMSHEM Pedestrians Walking Speed (fds) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) P > X platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 891 1485 884 IN tC,2 stage (s) p0 queue free% 100 100 98 EMEMMEN FEES Volume Left 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 344 Queue Length(ft) 0 _0 1 Lane LOS C Approach LOS C .�i Average Delay 0.1 �. G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 8 FUSSONMANC-FF51 16: East Site Drive & Felt Road Extension Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions weekday PM Peak Hour t Lane Configurations ' 4 T+ Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Frt 0.892 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 0 0 1863 1662 0 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 0 0 1863 1662 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Travel Time(s) 7.2 4.2 5.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 0 0 6 20 0 _ Control Type: Unsignalized G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 9 FUSSONMANC-FF51 16: East Site Drive & Felt Road Extension Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour t ' Lane Configurations Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked ' vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 18 12 20 tC,2 stage (s) p0 queue free% 98 100 100 Volume Left 21 0 0 cSH 1000 1596 1700 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 0 Lane LOS A Approach LOS A Average Delay y 3.9 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\2005 Combined PM.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 10 FUSSONMANC-FF51 c � BERRYPATCHHASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP October 29,2003 Mr.Peter J. Sangermano,Jr. Village Retirement Communities 715 Putnam Pike Greenville,RI 02828 Re: Berry Patch Expansion Dear Mr. Sangermano: The Town of South Windsor has recommended that we obtain an emergency access easement over the Village at Buckland Court property. Attached is a map entitled ,depicting the proposed location of the emergency access easement. Please also notice that there is a sidewalk adjacent to the emergency access easement which is strictly for pedestrian use. We have assured you that(1)the emergency access easement will be for emergency purposes only,(2)the emergency access easement and the sidewalk will be constructed and maintained(lawn,snow,ice,plantings,etc.)so long as it is in existence at our cost,and shall be subject to your approval on aesthetic details and appearance.We have further assured you that we will provide you with an indemnification from liability relating to the emergency access easement and sidewalk and that we will provide you with certificates of insurance annually. All of the foregoing is intended to be memorialized in an easement agreement to be recorded on the South Windsor land records in the event that the South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission grants approvals for the proposed Berry Patch expansion. Would you kindly acknowledge your agreement in concept with the foregoing,by signing and returning to me the enclosed copy of this letter? Thank you. Very Truly Yours, BERRY PATCH II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Berry Patch It GP,LLC By: Geoffrey W. Sager,Member AGREED AND ACCEPTED By: Name: 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax C:\DOCUME-1\banach\LOCALS-1\Temp\Sangermano acceptance.doc Zoning Amendments to Section 4.1.11.2c. Effective l l/l/2003 REPLACE Section 4.1.11.2c with the following: c. Project/Units Cap. The maximum number of units in any development shall be 102 units. The Commission may grant a waiver to increase the number of units in a development up to 200 units after finding: 1. Traffic impact will not be detrimental to surrounding areas; 2. The site is appropriate for a larger development;and I The increase will not create adverse impacts on surrounding property values. The cumulative total number of units in all units. developments cannot exceed 350 NOV-19-2009 11:12 FROM-metro Realty +8606776919 T-487 P-002/002 F-050 Fred Katten 115 Beverly Road West Hartford, Ct. November 3,2003 Ms. Marcia Banak Town Planner ' Town.of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear Ms.Banak- Please be advised that Peter DeMallie of Design Professionals,Inc.,is hereby authorized to sign on my behalf, for the Metro Realty Group Senior Housing proposal(also known as Berry Patch Expansion),all applications including but not limited to (1) Site Plan Approval,(2) Special Exception,(3)Inland Wetlands, (4)Water Pollution Control Authority,and(5) any other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Berry Patch expansion proposal. Very truly yours, Fred Katten Stormwater Management Plan Berry Patch II South Windsor, Connecticut kr NOV ` 4 2003 "OUT !'H 1+�+rJDSC;2 e K7�eC9 Z� s 47 . �O �� Prepared by Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 DPI Project No. 03-1823 November 4,2003 Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Proposed Development 1 Off Site Analysis 1 Peak Runoff control 2 Nonstructural Drainage System 2 Riparian Buffers 2 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Storm-water Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 2 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 Water Quality 5 On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations 5 Conclusions 5 Appendices Site Location Map A TR 55 Existing Conditions- Calvary Site B TR-55 Existing Conditions—Katten Site C TR-55 Developed Conditions Calvary Site D TR-55 Developed Conditions Katten Site E Detention/Infiltration Basin Design F Detention/Infiltration Basin Routings G Storm Sewer Calculations-Calvary Site H Storm Sewer Calculations-Katten Site I Introduction: The proposed Berry Patch II consists of two sites that are adjacent to the original Berry Patch site located on the south side of Oakland Road in South Windsor, Connecticut. One site is located to the northwest of the existing Berry Patch site and is known as the Katten site. The Katten site consists of 14.15 acres of land and extends from the northeast side of the Berry Patch site out to Buckland Road. The Katten site is bordered by a mixture of residential and commercial uses, and by the assisted living elderly housing. The site is presently being utilized for agricultural purposes as a pasture for cows. The Katten site is traversed by Farm Brook, and has substantial wetland and floodplain areas associated with Farm Brook. The second site is located to the southwest of the existing Berry Patch site and is known as the Calvary site. This site consists of 5.28 acres of land that will be divided off from the existing Calvary Church site. The Calvary church site is bordered by residential to the east,the Calvary Church to the west, open land of the Calvary Church to the south, and the Berry Patch and assisted living elderly housing to the north. Appendix A contains a site location map. Proposed Development: The proposed development of the site includes the construction of 96 elderly housing units contained within 5 buildings. Two of the buildings will be located on the Calvary Church site, and three buildings on the Katten site. As part of the development, access roadways,parking, and driveways will be constructed. Both sections will be serviced by public sanitary sewer and water. The Storm drainage system proposed for the development includes the installation of storm-sewers within the proposed access streets, vegetated drainage swales, and a piped storm drainage system. The drainage discharge from the development of the Calvary Church site will be to a detention/infiltration basin. The discharge from the Katten site will be to Farm brook. The intent of the design is to provide sufficient detention/infiltration on the Calvary church site to mitigate the peak stormwater discharges from the development of both sites. Off-Site Analysis: The large majority of the Calvary Church site presently drains to the northwest to a swale that runs along the eastern side of the Calvary church and then along the northern property boundary to the west to Buckland Road. The storm sewers within Buckland Road discharge to Farm Brook. A small corner of the Calvary Church site drains to the northeast to the Berry Patch site. The Katten site drains directly to Farm Brook via overland flow. Farm Brook traverses the site from east to west, and discharges from the site under Buckland Road. In this same vicinity,the storm drainage from Buckland Road is discharged into the Farm Brook. Peak Runoff Control: The intent of the design is to provide sufficient detention/infiltration on the Calvary church site to mitigate the peak stormwater discharges from the development of both the Calvary Church and Katten sites. Nonstructural Drainage Systems: -The site will make use of a number of nonstructural measures to help control the runoff on the site, and help treat the runoff. The most important measures are the Infiltration/Detention basin, and the water quality swales that will collect the runoff from the piped drainage system, and help treat the runoff prior to discharge. Riparian Buffers: Buffer areas will be maintained between the Farm Brook and existing developed areas and the proposed development. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the site design. These measures include the following: 1. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of silt fence around catch basins. 4. Use of temporary sediment basins during construction. 5. Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 6. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 7. Installation of construction entrance pads and sweeping of roadways as needed. 8. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality: A number of water quality measures have been integrated into the site design to provide for treatment of the stormwater runoff from the site. These include the infiltration/detention basin and the water quality swales that will treat the runoff from the site prior to discharge. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to the infiltration/detention basin on the Calvary church site and water quality swales on the Katten site. The piped drainage system has been designed to accommodate the runoff from a 10 Yr design storm. Discharge at the Natural Location: The Katten site presently drains to Farm Brook,and will continue to under developed conditions. The Calvary Site presently drains to the swale along the north side of the Calvary Church site, and will continue to under developed conditions. Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water System, Infiltration/Detention basin and Water Quality Swales. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide, and additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system. Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. Catch Basins: The catch Basins within each lot shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reaches 1'. Pavement Sweeping: The pavement areas shall be swept at a minimum of once per year, in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season. Infiltration/Detention Water Quality Basin and Water Quality Swales: The water quality basin and water quality swales shall be inspected twice yearly. All large woody growth that may affect the flow of water or the stability of the basin or swales shall be removed. The spillway shall also be inspected after any flow passes through it. The riprap shall be re-arranged and added to as required to maintain the design as per the design plans. Any erosion or other problems that may affect the proper operation of the water quality basin or water quality swales shall be repaired promptly. Topographic Contour Maps: Topographic contour maps have been provided showing the drainage areas for the two sites at a scale of 1"=40'. The maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included in the rear of this report. Floodplain Boundaries: There are floodplain boundaries on the Katten site. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The drainage piping on site was designed using the rational formula. The detention/infiltration basin was sized using a computer program by Hydrographs called Hydroflow. The program allows for the development of hydrographs representing the developed flows into the basin, and the modeling of the basin with elevation/storage/discharge curves to represent the basin. The program than provides the routing of the hydrograph through the basin, and provides peak discharge and storage information. The intent of the design is to provide sufficient detention/infiltration on the Calvary church site to mitigate the peak stormwater discharges from the development of both sites. The existing Calvary site and Katten site were modeled using the TR-55 computer program. The small portion of the Calvary site that presently drains to the northeast was not included in the existing conditions drainage calculations. Only the portion of the site draining to the northwest was included in the calculations. On the Katten site,only the portion of the site that will be developed as part of the proposed development was included in the calculations. The TR-55 calculations for the Calvary and Katten sites are included in appendix B and C respectively. The Calvary site was analyzed under developed conditions using the TR-55 computer program. Under developed conditions, there will be an increase in peak runoff from the site. The results of the TR-55 analysis are included in appendix D, and the existing and developed peak discharges(in cubic feet per second) are summarized below: Storm Freq. Existing Peak Discharge Developed Peak Discharge 2 2 3 10 6 8 25 8 11 50 11 14 100 13 17 The Katten site was analyzed under developed conditions using the TR-55 computer program. Under developed conditions,there will be an increase in peak runoff rates from the site. The results of the TR-55 analysis are included in appendix E, and the existing and developed peak discharges are summarized below: Storm Freq. Existing Peak Discharge Developed Peak Discharge 2 2 5 10 6 9 25 8 12 50 10 14 100 12 16 The discharges from both sites end up in the farm brook. In order to mitigate for the peak flows from each property, a detention/infiltration basin is proposed on the Calvary site. The basin has been sized to provide sufficient detention for the 2-100 year storm events. The basin is sized to provide the equal or less peak flows than under existing conditions from the combination of both properties. The design peak flow would therefore be the existing total peak flow from both properties less the developed peak discharge from the Katten property. The results are summarized below: Storm Freq. Total Exist. Devel. Peak Disch. Req'd Discharge Peak Discharge Katten Property) (Detention Basin) 2 4 5 -1 10 12 9 3 25 16 12 4 50 21 14 7 100 25 16 9 The design discharge from the proposed detention basin has a design discharge for the 2 year design storm of-1 cubic foot per second (CFS). The 10 year through 100 year design storms range from 3-9 CFS. The-1 CFS is due to rounding of design flows within the TR-55 analysis to the nearest 1 CFS. The proposed detention basin was modeled using the Hydrograph Hydroflo computer program. The basin design is included in appendix F. The Routing of the storm flows under developed conditions for the 2-100 year storm events was prepared, and is included in appendix G. The summary of the total flow under existing and developed conditions is summarized herein: Storm Frequency Required Discharge (Detention Basin) Design Discharge 2 -1 0.28 10 3 0.69 25 4 0.97 50 7 1.23 100 9 1.45 As can be seen from the detention basin design,the discharge for the 2-100 year storm events is generally substantially less than the existing peak discharge into Farm Brook. Water Quality: A number of measures have been integrated into the site design to address water quality issues from the development of the site. The two most significant design measures are the infiltration/detention basin on the Calvary site, and the water quality swales on the Katten site. The infiltration/detention basin has been designed with a volume below the outlet discharge pipe that will provide capacity for the initial flush from the site. This volume exceeds the volume of runoff from the site for a 1.25"rainfall event. The water quality swales have been designed on the Katten site to provide settling and contact with vegetation for the storm runoff prior to discharge to the wetlands. The swales are a minimum of 200' long, and provide stone berms to promote settling and infiltration of runoff from smaller storm events. ewer calculations for the storm piping On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations: The storms p p g v within the proposed private roadways are included in appendix H for the Calvary Site and appendix I for the Katten Site. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the rational formula. Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated infiltration/detention basin and water quality swales will mitigate any potential water quality and quantity impacts from the development of the site. APPENDIX A �& �' '`},, ► KENT d r C q G O�GAS F o°c�NI 74 ��? e �/ NC \'F Rob s SAND LL p4\� HERITAGE DPo tilt, oa/� s,Rgy o�j, b OR/IF DRIVE KUPCHuIOSc�;p� DR\`IE OR/F �� L ANSI ,p. 194 �Ar C MUNITY op F o A wrt ELLINGTON AD RDAD a, 30 �i \ 9t HTAI /!MN' �iNc S FC�oA Ap N�I'E' p� DEllf \ q/C �I'F 6ENE��fi fey EW G� I .� si E S 3D 4 w.oft„M _ N � THDMPSCN RCL.E(Pvt) C �a �NE(P) va s o OR DRAKE ? d AY PpµtER �1 �P 3 .. EB . l l�P GR wn��°rt CGIN T $� pull G SMITH SIREET DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EC) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) -----------------------------=------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Pasture, grassland or range good - 6 .85 (61) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6 .85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 6 .85 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 61* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County • HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EC) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 200 .04 E 0 .215 Shallow Concent 'd 200 . 04 U 0 .017 Open Channel 400 2 0 . 056 Time of Concentration = 0 .29* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res . ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 a Res . H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 o Res . I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EC) Data: Drainage Area 6 .85 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 61 * Time of Concentration: 0 .29 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3 .2 4 . 7 5 .5 6 .2 6 .9 Ia/P Ratio 0 .40 0 .27 0 .23 0 .21 0 .19 Runoff (in) 0 .44 1.19 1.68 2 .14 2 .63 Unit Peak Discharge 0 .525 0 .688 0 . 711 0 .726 0 .738 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .00 Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 2 6 8 11 13 ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- * - Value (s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EK) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Pasture, grassland or range fair - 4 .04 (69) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 4 .04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 4 .04 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 69* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EK) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 150 .03 J 0 .171 Shallow Concent'd 200 .03 U 0 .020 Open Channel 100 2 0 .014 Time of Concentration = 0 .21* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res . ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 o Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County • HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823EK) Data: Drainage Area 4 .04 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 69 * Time of Concentration: 0 .21 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3 .2 4 .7 5 .5 6 .2 6 .9 Ia/P Ratio 0 .28 0 .19 0 .16 0 . 14 0 .13 Runoff (in) 0 .78 1 .74 2 .33 2 .87 3 .43 Unit Peak Discharge 0 .764 0 .817 0 . 833 0 .844 0 . 853 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 . 09o- Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 2 6 8 10 12 * - Value (s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX D RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DC) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 750 - 2 .5 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 1 .35 (98) - - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Pasture, grassland or range good - 3 .0 (61) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6 .85. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 6 .85 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 68* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DC) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 200 .04 E 0 .215 Shallow Concent'd 200 .04 U 0 . 017 Open Channel 400 2 0 .056 Time of Concentration = 0 .29* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res . ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 o Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 o Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS CALVERY PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DC) Data: Drainage Area 6.85 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 68 * Time of Concentration: 0 .29 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3 .2 4 .7 5 .5 6 .2 6 .9 Ia/P Ratio 0 .29 0 .20 0 .17 0 .15 0 .14 Runoff (in) 0 .73 1.67 2 .24 2 .78 3 .33 Unit Peak Discharge 0 .675 0 .729 0 . 746 0.758 0 . 767 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1. 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 00 0 . 0 Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 3 8 11 14 17 * - Value (s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX E RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DK) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 750 - 2 .01 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 2 . 03 (98) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 4 .04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 4 .04 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 80* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DK) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 150 . 03 J 0 .171 Shallow Concent'd 200 .03 U 0 .020 Open Channel 100 2 0 .014 Time of Concentration = 0 .21* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 o Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 . 00 Project : BERRY PATCH II User: GBS Date: 10/27/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS KATEN PROPERTY 10/27/03 (1823DK) Data: Drainage Area 4 .04 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 80 * Time of Concentration: 0 .21 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3 .2 4 .7 5 .5 6 . 2 6 .9 Ia/P Ratio 0 . 16 0 .11 0 . 09 0 .08 0 .07 Used 0 . 16 0 :11 0 .10 0 .10 0 .10 Runoff (in) 1.40 2 . 63 3 .33 3 .96 4 .60 Unit Peak Discharge 0 .837 0 . 867 0 .871 0 .871 0 .871 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .00-. Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 5 9 12 14 16 ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- * - Value (s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX F Reservoir Report Page 1 Reservoir No. 1 - detention basin Hydraflow Hydrographs by IntelisoNe Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Conic method used. Stage/Storage Table Stage(I ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storm(cult) 0.00 134.00 5,600 0 0 1.00 136.00 9,600 7,510 7,510 2.00 136.00 9,600 9,599 17,109 3.00 137.00 10,450 10,021 27,130 4.00 138.00 11,300 10,871 38,001 5.00 139.00 12,950 12,114 50,116 6.00 140.00 14,625 13,778 63,893 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [Al [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise in = 15.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span in = 15.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.It = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.ft = 135.00 136.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = - - - - Length ft = 60.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope% = 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 N-Value = .013 .013 .000 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 Mufti-Stage = n/a Yes No No Eufiltration Rate = 0.00 in/hrlsgft Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 It Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage J Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total It cuft 1t cis cis cfs cfs cis cfs cis cis cis cfs 0.00 0 134.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - - 0.00 1.00 7,510 136.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - -- 0.00 2.00 17,109 136.00 0.75 0.00 - - - - - - - 0.00 3.00 27,130 137.00 0.82 0.82 - - - - -- - -- 0.82 4.00 38,001 138.00 129 1.25 - - - - -- - - 1.25 5.00 50,116 139.00 1.59 1.57 - - - - -- - - 1.57 6.00 63,893 140.00 1.86 1.83 - -- -- - - - - 1.83 APPENDIX G Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisohre Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.28 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = detention basin Max. Elevation = 136.34 ft Max. Storage = 10,744 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=9,850 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExHl Outflow (hrs) cfs . ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 13.60 0.58 136.15 0.08 0.07 ---- -- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.07 13.70 0.56 136.17 0.10 0.09 -- --- ----- ____ ____ ___- ___ 0.09 13.80 0.55 136.19 0.11 0.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.10 13.90 0.53 136.20 0.13 0.12 - - - - - - ----- 0.12 14.00 0.51 136.22 0.15 0.13 ----- --- --- - --- --- ---- --- 0.13 14.10 0.49 136.23 0.17 0.15 ---- -- --- ___ ____ -_ ____ 0.15 14.20 0.48 136.24 0.18 0.17 -- -- - ----- ----- -- ---- 0.17 14.30 0.46 136.25 0.20 0.18 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.18 14.40 0.45 136.26 0.21 0.19 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.19 14.50 0.44 136.27 0.22 0.20 ----- - - - - - - 0.20 14.60 0.43 136.28 0.24 0.21 ---- --- ---- ---- --- --- ---- 0.21 14.70 0.43 136.29 0.25 0.22 -- -- -__ ____ _____ __-_ ___ 0.22 14.80 0.42 136.30 0.26 0.23 --- -- --- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.23 14.90 0.41 136.30 0.26 0.24 ----- --- ----- --- ----- ----- ---- 0.24 15.00 0.40 136.31 0.27 0.25 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.25 15.10 0.39 136.31 0.28 0.26 - - - - - - - 0.26 15.20 0.38 136.32 0.29 0.26 --- -- ----- ---- --- --- ---- 0.26 15.30 0.37 136.32 0.29 0.27 --- ---- -- -- ---- -- ---- 0.27 15.40 0.36 136.33 0.30 0.27 ----- --- --- ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.27 15.50 0.35 136.33 0.30 0.28 --- ---- - ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.28 15.60 0.34 136.33 0.31 0.28 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- --- 0.28 15.70 0.33 136.33 0.31 0.28 ----- - ---- -- - - -- 0.28 15.80 0.31 136.34 0.31 0.28 ---- - ---- ---- --- -- --- 0.28 15.90 0.30 136.34 0.31 0.28 0.28 16.00 0.29 136.34 0.31 0.28 ---- -- --- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.28 16.10 0.28 136.34 << 0.31 0.28 ---- --_ -_-- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.28 << 16.20 0.27 136.34 0.31 0.28 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.28 16.30 0.27 136.34 0.31 0.28 - - - - -- - -- 0.28 16.40 0.26 136.34 0.31 0.28 -- ----- --- --- ----- - -- 0.28 16.50 0.26 136.33 0.31 0.28 - -- -- --- - --- --- 0.28 16.60 0.25 136.33 0.31 0.28 ---- --- --- ----- --- --- --- 0.28 16.70 0.25 136.33 0.31 0.28 -- ---- -- --- ----- ---- ----- 0.28 16.80 0.24 136.33 0.30 0.28 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.28 16.90 0.24 136.33 0.30 0.28 -- - ----- - - - -- 0.28 17.00 0.23 136.33 0.30 0.27 - -- -- -- -- ----- -=--- 0.27 17.10 0.23 136.33 0.30 0.27 -- -- - ----- ---- ----- -- 0.27 17.20 0.22 136.33 0.30 0.27 --- --- ----- --- ----- ----- --- 0.27 17.30 0.22 136.32 0.29 0.27 ----- --- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.27 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfi1 Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 17.40 0.21 136.32 0.29 0.26 ---- --- --- - ----- ---- ---- 0.26 17.50 0.21 136.32 0.29 026 - -- -- --- ____ _____ ____ 0.26 17.60 0.20 136.32 0.28 0.26 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 0.26 17.70 0.20 136.32 0.28 0.26 - - - -- - - --- 0.26 17.80 0.19 136.31 0.28 0.25 - - - -- -- -- - --- 0.25 17.90 0.19 136.31 0.28 0.25 - ---- -- - --- --- --- 0.25 18.00 0.18 136.31 0.27 0.25 --- ---- ---- __- ---- --- ---- 0.25 18.10 0.18 136.31 0.27 0.24 --- -- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- 0.24 18.20 0.17 136.30 0.26 0.24 ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- 0.24 18.30 0.17 136.30 0.26 0.24 - - - -- - ---- - 0.24 18.40 0.17 136.30 0.26 0.24 ----- --- -- ----- ----- -- --- 0.24 18.50 0.17- 136.30 0.25 0.23 - --- --- -- ---- ---- --- 0.23 18.60 0.17 136.29 0.25 0.23 --- - --- -- ---- --- --- 0.23 18.70 0.17 136.29 0.25 0.23 -- --- ----- ---- ---- -- --- 0.23 18.80 0.16 136.29 0.25 0.22 ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 0.22 18.90 0.16 136.29 0.24 0.22 - - - - ----- - ---- 0.22 19.00 0.16 136.28 0.24 0.22 -- --- ----- --- ---- --- ----- 0.22 19.10 0.16 136.28 0.24 0.22 -- --- -- ----- -- - ---- 0.22 19.20 0.16 136.28 0.23 0.21 --- - - - ---- - ---- 0.21 19.30 0.16 136.28 0.23 0.21 _- ----- _____ -_ ___ 0.21 19.40 0.16 136.28 0.23 0.21 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.21 19.50 0.15 136.27 0.23 0.21 - - - - - - - 0.21 19.60 0.15 136.27 0.22 0.20 - -- ----- ---- --- ---- ----- 0.20 19.70 0.15 136.27 0.22 0.20 - -- --- ---- ---- -- ----- 0.20 19.80 0.15 136.27 0.22 0.20 --- ----- --- _____ -_ ___ _-_ 0.20 19.90 0.15 136.27 0.22 0.20 -- ---- ---- --- ---- -- ----- 0.20 20.00 0.15 136.27 0.21 0.19 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.19 20.10 0.15 136.26 0.21 0.19 ----- - - - - - - 0.19 20.20 0.14 136.26 0.21 0.19 -- ----- --- ----- ---- -- ---- 0.19 20.30 0.14 136.26 0.21 0.19 ----- ---- ---- --- -- ----- -- 0.19 20.40 0.14 136.26 0.20 0.19 - -- -- -- ---- -- - 0.19 20.50 0.14 136.26 0.20 0.18 ----- --- ---- -__ -__ ____ ___ 0.18 20.60 0.14 136.26 0.20 0.18 ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.18 20.70 0.14 136.25 0.20 0.18 - - - - ---- - - 0.18 20.80 0.13 136.25 0.20 0.18 -- --- ---- - -- --- ---- 0.18 20.90 0.13 136.25 0.19 0.18 --- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.18 21.00 0.13 136.25 0.19 0.17 -- --- -- --- -- -- ----- 0.17 21.10 0.13 136.25 0.19 0.17 -__ -__ _-_ ____ ____ _-_ ___ 0.17 21.20 0.13 136.25 0.19 0.17 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.17 21.30 0.13 136.24 0.19 0.17 - - - - ---- - - 0.17 21.40 0.13 136.24 0.18 0.17 ---- --- --- --- --- - - 0.17 21.50 0.12 136.24 0.18 0.16 ----- -- -- - -- -- --- 0.16 21.60 0.12 136.24 0.1.8 0.16 ----- -- ---- _____ _- _____ -- 0.16 21.70 0.12 136.24 0.18 0.16 - ---- --- --- ---- --- --- 0.16 21.80 0.12 136.24 0.18 0.16 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.16 21.90 0.12 136.24 0.17 0.16 ----- - - - - - - 0.16 22.00 0.12 136.23 0.17 0.15 -- -- ----- - ----- - ---- 0.15 22.10 0.13 136.23 0.17 0.15 --- -- --- --- --- -- -- 0.15 22.20 0.15 136.23 0.17 0.15 ----- ----- - - - - ----- 0.15 22.30 0.14 136.23 0.17 0.15 ----- ___ -_ ___ _____ ____ ____ 0.15 22.40 0.13 136.23 0.17 0.15 --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.15 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExH1 Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 22.50 0.12 136.23 0.17 0.15 --- ---- ---- -- --- ----- ---- 0.15 22.60 0.12 136.23 0.17 0.15 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.15 22.70 0.12 136.23 0.16 0.15 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.15 22.80 0.11 136.23 0.16 0.15 - - - --- ---- ----- ----- 0.15 22.90 0.11 136.23 0.16 0.14 -- --- -- -- - - ----- 0.14 23.00 0.11 136.22 0.16 0.14 --- ---- ----- ---- - -- --- 0.14 23.10 0.11 136.22 0.16 0.14 -- - _-_ _- ___ ____ _____ ____ 0.14 23.20 0.11 136.22 0.16 0.14 ---- ---- --- ----- ---- ---- ---- 0.14 23.30 0.11 136.22 0.16 0.14 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.14 23.40 0.11 136.22 0.15 0.14 ----- -- --- - ---- - - 0.14 23.50 0.11 136.22 0.15 0.14 -- - --- -- -- - --- 0.14 23.60 0.10 136.22 0.15 0.13 ---- --- -- -- -- ---- --- 0.13 23.70 0.10 136.22 0.15 0.13 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- --- ----- 0.13 23.80 0.10 136.22 0.15 0.13 ---- ---- ---- -- ___ _____ ____ 0.13 23.90 0.10 136.21 0.15 0.13 ----- ----- ---- ----- --- ----- ----- 0.13 24.00 0.10 136.21 0.15 0.13 -- --- -- ----- ----- - ---- 0.13 24.10 0.08 136.21 0.14 0.13 --- --- --- -- -- -- ----- 0.13 24.20 0.05 136.21 0.14 0.12 --- ---- --- -- -- -- -- 0.12 24.30 0.02 136.21 0.14 0.12 --- ---- --- ----- -__ _____ -_ 0.12 24.40 0.01 136.20 0.13 0.12 ----- ---- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- 0.12 24.50 0.00 136.20 0.13 0.11 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.11 24.60 0.00 136.19 0.12 0.11 - -- -- -- - - ----- 0.11 24.70 0.00 136.19 0.12 0.10 ---- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- --- 0.10 24.80 0.00 136.19 0.11 0.10 --- --- ---- ----- --- --- --- 0.10 24.90 0.00 136.18 0.11 0.10 -- --- ---- --- ----- --- -- 0.10 25.00 0.00 136.18 0.11 0.10 ---- ---- ___ ____ ____ ____ _-_ 0.10 25.10 0.00 136.18 0.10 0.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.09 25.20 0.00 136.17 0.10 0.09 -- ----- - - - - - 0.09 25.30 0.00 136.17 0.10 0.09 ---- --- ---- ----- -- --- --- 0.09 25.40 0.00 136.17 0.09 0.08 --__ __ _ -_ ____ ___ _____ _____ 0.08 25.50 0.00 136.16 0.09 0.08 --- ----- -- ____ _-__ _____ _____ 0.08 25.60 0.00 136.16 0.09 0.08 ---- ----- -- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.08 25.70 0.00 136.16 0.09 0.08 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.08 25.80 0.00 136.15 0.08 0.07 - -- --- - - - -- 0.07 25.90 0.00 136.15 0.08 0.07 ---- --- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.07 26.00 0.00 136.15 0.08 0.07 -- --- --- --- ---- --- ---- 0.07 26.10 0.00 136.15 0.08 0.07 ---- ---- -- - ---- --- ---- ---- 0.07 26.20 0.00 136.14 0.07 0.07 --- ---- --- ----- --- --- ----- 0.07 26.30 0.00 136.14 0.07 0.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.06 26.40 0.00 136.14 0.07 0.06 - - - - --- -- --- 0.06 26.50 0.00 136.14 0.07 0.06 - - - --- ---- ---- --- 0.06 26.60 0.00 136.13 0.06 0.06 -- -- --- - ----- -- --- 0.06 26.70 0.00 136.13 0.06 0.06 ---- --- --- ----- ----- --- ---- 0.06 ...End Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.69 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = detention basin Max. Elevation = 136.78 ft Max. Storage = 24,043 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=22,444 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfi1 Outflow (hrs) cfs . ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.30 7.88 136.32 0.28 0.26 -- - - -- --- --- --- 0.26 12.40 6.86 136.58 0.56 0.54 --- ----- --- --- --- ---- ----- 0.54 12.50 5.27 136.78<< 0.72 0.69 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.69<< 12.60 3.75 136.58 0.57 0.55 - - - - - - - 0.55 13.00 1.65 136.26 0.20 0.18 -- - ----- --- --- - ---- 0.18 13.10 1.51 136.30 0.27 0.24 -- --- ---- ----- ----- --- --- 0.24 13.20 1.39 136.35 0.33 0.30 --- - - -- ---- --- 0.30 13.30 1.31 136.38 0.38 0.35 --- ---- -- ____ ____ ____ ----- 0.35 13.40 1.26 136.42 0.42 0.38 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.38 13.50 1.22 136.45 0.44 0.42 - - - - - - - 0.42 13.60 1.18 136.47 0.45 0.45 -- - -- --- -- -- -- 0.45 13.70 1.14 136.50 0.47 0.47 -- -- -- ---- --- -- ---- 0.47 13.80 1.10 136.52 0.50 0.49 ---- - - -- ---- ----- ---- 0.49 13.90 1.06 136.54 0.52 0.51 ----- --___ -_ _-_ _-_ ____ ____ 0.51 14.00 1.02 136.56 0.55 0.53 ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.53 14.10 0.98 136.58 0.W 0.54 - - - - - - ----- 0.54 14.20 0.95 136.59 0.58 0.55 - -- -- --- -- -- -- 0.55 14.30 0.92 136.61 0.59 0.56 --- ---- ___ _____ -__ ____ ___ 0.56 14.40 0.90 136.62 0.60 0.57 - - -- -- - --- ----- 0.57 14.50 0.88 136.63 0.61 0.58 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ----- 0.58 14.60 0.86 136.64 0.62 0.59 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.59 14.70 0.84 136.65 0.63 0.60 - - - - - - - 0.60 14.80 0.82 136.66 0.63 0.60 - -- ---- -- - --- --- 0.60 14.90 0.80 136.67 0.64 0.61 ---- ----- --- - --- -- ---- 0.61 15.00 0.78 136.67 0.64 0.61 ----- -- ----- ----- --- - ---- 0.61 15.10 0.76 136.68 0.64 0.62 ---- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ---- 0.62 15.20 0.74 136.68 0.65 0.62 ----- ---- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 0.62 15.30 0.72 136.69 0.65 0.62 - - - - ---- - - 0.62 15.40 0.70 136.69 0.65 0.63 - - --- - --- - - 0.63 15.50 0.68 136.69 0.65 0.63 - - --- - --- --- - --- 0.63 15.60 0.66 136.69 0.66 0.63 - - - - -- -- ---- 0.63 15.70 0.63 136.69 0.66 0.63 --- -- -- -- ---- --- ----- 0.63 15.80 0.61 136.69 0.66 0.63 ---- ____ ____ ___ _____ ___- _____ 0.63 15.90 0.59 136.69 0.66 0.63 - - - - ----- - ---- 0.63 16.00 0.57 136.69 0.65 0.63 - -- --- --- --- - ----- 0.63 16.10 0.55 136.69 0.65 0.62 -- -- -- - --- --- --- 0.62 16.20 0.53 136.68 0.65 0.62 -- --- ----- --- --- --- ----- 0.62 16.30 0.52 136.68 0.65 0.62 --- ____ _-_ ___ ____ _____ _____ 0.62 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A CIv B CIv C CIv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hm) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.40 0.50 136.68 0.64 0.62 - - - - ----- ---- ---- 0.62 16.50 0.49 136.67 0.64 0.61 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- --- --- 0.61 16.60 0.49 136.67 0.64 0.61 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.61 16.70 0.48 136.66 0.64 0.61 - ---- - - - - - 0.61 16.80 0.47 136.66 0.63 0.60 - - --- -- -- - - --- 0.60 16.90 0.46 136.65 0.63 0.60 - --- --- ---- ----- --- --- 0.60 17.00 0.45 136.65 0.62 0.60 --- - ---- - --- --- ----- 0.60 17.10 0.44 136.64 0.62 0.59 ----- ---- ---- ---- --- --- --- 0.59 17.20 0.43 136.64 0.62 0.59 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.59 17.30 0.42 136.63 0.61 0.58 - - - - - - - 0.58 17.40 0.41 136.63 0.61 0.58 -- -- - - -- ---- ----- 0.58 17.50 0.40 136.62 0.60 0.57 ----- -- -- --- --- ---- ---- 0.57 17.60 0.39 136.61 0.60 0.57 - ---- --- - -- --- ----- 0.57 17.70 0.38 136.61 0.59 0.56 ---- ----- -- -- --- --- ----- 0.56 17.80 0.37 136.60 0.59 0.56 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.56 17.90 0.36 136.59 0.58 0.55 - - - - - - - 0.55 18.00 0.35 136.59 0.57 0.55 -- -- ----- - ----- -- - 0.55 18.10 0.34 136.58 0.57 0.54 --- -- ---- ----- --- ----- ---- 0.54 18.20 0.33 136.57 0.56 0.54 -- --- --- --- --- -- ---- 0.54 18.30 0.33 136.56 0.55 0.53 --- ---- ----- -- --- ----- 0.53 18.40 0.32 136.56 0.54 0.52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.52 18.50 0.32 136.55 0.53 0.52 - - - ---- - - - 0.52 18.60 0.32 136.54 0.52 0.51 -- ---- -- ---- -- - - 0.51 18.70 0.32 136.54 0.52 0.50 -- -__ ___ _- ___ _____ -- 0.50 18.80 0.31 136.53 0.51 0.50 ----- -- -- ---- --- --- ---- 0.50 18.90 0.31 136.52 0.50 0.49 ----- ---- --_ ____ -__ -__ _____ 0.49 19.00 0.31 136.52 0.49 0.49 ----- ----- --- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.49 19.10 0.30 136.51 0.48 0.48 - - - - ---- - - 0.48 19.20 0.30 136.50 0.48 0.48 -- - --- --- --- -- --- 0.48 19.30 0.30 136.50 0.47 0.47 --- --- --- ---- ----- ---- ----- 0.47 19.40 0.30 136.49 0.47 0.46 ----- - ----- - -- ---- ----- 0.46 19.50 0.29 136.49 0.46 0.46 --- - --- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- 0.46 19.60 0.29 136.48 0.46 0.45 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.45 19.70 0.29 136.47 0.45 0.45 - - - - ----- ----- - 0.45 19.80 0.28 136.47 0.45 0.44 --- --- --- -- --- -- - 0.44 19.90 0.28 136.46 0.45 0.43 --- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- 0.43 20.00 0.28 136.46 0.44 0.43 ---- --- ---- -- - -- ---- 0.43 20.10 0.28 136.45 0.44 0.42 -- ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ---- 0.42 20.20 0.27 136.45 0.44 0.42 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.42 20.30 0.27 136.44 0.43 0.41 - - - - - - - 0.41 20.40 0.27 136.44 0.43 0.41 -- - -- - --- --- - 0.41 20.50 0.26 136.43 0.43 0.40 0.40 20.60 0.26 136.43 0.42 0.40 -- -- - ---- -- -- ---- 0.40 20.70 0.26 136.42 0.42 0.39 ---- --- ---- ----- ---- --- --- 0.39 20.80 0.25 136.42 0.42 0.39 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.39 20.90 0.25 136.41 0.41 0.38 - - - - - - - 0.38 21.00 0.25 136.41 0.41 0.38 - - -- --- ---- - - 0.38 21.10 0.25 136.40 0.41 0.37 -- -- -- -- -- ----- --- 0.37 21.20 0.24 136.40 0.40 0.37 - --- -- - - -- -- 0.37 21.30 0.24 136.39 0.40 0.36 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.36 21.40 0.24 136.39 0.39 0.35 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- 0.35 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExHl Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.50 0.23 136.39 0.38 0.35 -- -- --- -- -- ---- --- 0.35 21.60 0.23 136.38 0.38 0.34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- 0.34 21.70 0.23 136.38 0.37 0.34 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.34 21.80 0.22 136.37 0.37 0.33 - - - - - - 0.33 21.90 0.22 136.37 0.36 0.33 - --- ---- --- --- ---- -- 0.33 22.00 0.22 136.37 0.36 0.32 --- ---- ----- --- --- ---- ---- 0.32 22.10 0.24 136.36 0.35 0.32 ---- --- --- -- --- ---- ---- 0.32 22.20 0.27 136.36 0.35 0.32 -- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- - 0.32 22.30 0.26 136.36 0.35 0.31 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.31 22.40 0.25 136.36 0.34 0.31 - - - - - - - 0.31 22.50 0.23 136.35 0.34 0.31 -- - ---- --- --- -- -- 0.31 22.60 0.22, 136.35 0.33 0.30 ----- --- ---- ----- -- -- ---- 0.30 22.70 0.22 136.35 0.33 0.30 ----- --- -- ----- - --- ---- 0.30 22.80 0.21 136.35 0.33 0.30 ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ---- ---- 0.30 22.90 0.21 136.34 0.32 0.29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.29 23.00 0.21 136.34 0.32 0.29 - ----- -- - - - - -- 0.29 23.10 0.21 136.34 0.31 0.29 ----- ---- ----- -- --- --- --- 0.29 23.20 0.21 136.33 0.31 0.28 ---- ----- --- --- -- ----- ---- 0.28 23.30 0.20 136.33 0.31 0.28 --- --- ---- --- ---- -- ----- 0.28 23.40 0.20 136.33 0.30 0.27 ----- ---- ---- ___ _--- _____ ____ 0.27 23.50 0.20 136.33 0.30 0.27 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.27 23.60 0.20 136.32 0.29 0.27 - - ---- - --- - - 0.27 23.70 0.19 136.32 0.29 0.26 --- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.26 23.80 0.19 136.32 0.29 0.26 ----- ---- -- -- -- --- ----- 0.26 23.90 0.19 136.32 0.28 0.26 ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ----- 0.26 24.00 0.19 136.31 0.28 0.26 ---- ----- --- ----- -- ---- ----- 0.26 24.10 0.15 136.31 0.28 0.25 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.25 24.20 0.09 136.31 0.27 0.25 - --- - - - - - 0.25 24.30 0.05 136.30 0.26 0.24 -- --- ---- ---- - --- ----- 0.24 24.40 0.02 136.29 0.25 0.23 ---- ----- -- ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.23 24.50 0.00 136.29 0.24 0.22 --- --- -- --- --- ----- --- 0.22 24.60 0.00 136.28 0.23 021 ----- --- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- 0.21 24.70 0.00 136.27 0.22 0.20 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.20 24.80 0.00 136.26 0.21 0.19 - - - - - - -- - 0.19 24.90 0.00 136.26 0.20 0.18 -- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- -- 0.18 25.00 0.00 136.25 0.19 0.17 ----- ---- ---- -- - ----- --- 0.17 25.10 0.00 136.24 0.19 0.17 ----- -- ---- ----- ---- --- ----- 0.17 25.20 0.00 136.24 0.18 0.16 --__ ___- ----- _-- _____ _____ ----- 0.16 25.30 0.00 136.23 0.17 0.15 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.15 25A0 0.00 136.23 0.16 0.15 -- ---- - --- -- ----- -- 0.15 25.50 0.00 136.22 0.16 0.14 ---- ----- ---- -- --- ---- ----- 0.14 ...End Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.97 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = detention basin Max. Elevation = 137.30 ft Max. Storage = 30,345 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=36,048 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs. ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.20 11.26 << 136.44 0.43 0.41 -- --- - _-_ ___ -__ __-- 0.41 12.30 10.68 136.83 0.76 0.72 ---- ---- --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.72 12.50 6.97 136.46 0.45 0.43 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.43 12.60 4.93 136.66 0.63 0.60 --- - --- - - ----- ---- --- ----- 0.60 12.70 3.68 136.79 0.73 0.69 -- - ---- --- ---- --- ---- 0.69 12.80 2.87 136.88 0.80 0.75 --- ---- - -- ----- ---- ---- 0.75 12.90 2.40 136.95 0.82 0.79 ----- - ---- --- --- ---- --- 0.79 13.00 2.13 137.00 0.82 0.82 --- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.82 13.10 1.95 137.04 0.85 0.84 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.84 13.20 1.80 137.07 0.88 0.86 ----- - ---- - - ----- ----- 0.86 13.30 1.70 137.10 0.90 0.87 --- -- - --- --- --- - ---- ---- 0.87 13.40 1.62 137.13 0.91 0.89 - --- ___ ___ -__ _- ____ 0.89 13.50 1.57 137.15 0.91 0.90 ---- ----- ----- -- --- - -- 0.90 13.60 1.52 137.17 0.92 0.91 ---- ---- --- ----- ----- --- ---- 0.91 13.70 1.47 137.19 0.92 0.92 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.92 13.80 1.41 137.21 0.93 0.93 - - - - - - - 0.93 13.90 1.36 137.22 0.94 0.93 --- ---- -- -- -- ---- ----- 0.93 14.00 1.31 137.24 0.95 0.94 --- --- ---- --- --- ---- ---- 0.94 14.10 1.26 137.25 0.96 0.94 --- -- --- --- ---- ---- --- 0.94 14.20 1.21 137.26 0.96 0.95 ---- ----- -- ---- ---- --- ----- 0.95 14.30 1.18 137.27 0.97 0.95 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.95 14.40 1.15 137.27 0.98 0.96 - - ----- - ----- ----- - 0.96 14.50 1.12 137.28 0.98 0.96 -- ----- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.96 14.60 1.10 137.28 0.98 0.96 --- ----- - ----- ---- ----- --- 0.96 14.70 1.07 137.29 0.99 0.96 0_96 14.80 1.05 137.29 0.99 0.96 --- -- -- --- ----- ---- --- 0.96 14.90 1.02 137.29 0.99 0.97 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.97 15.00 1.00 137.30 0.99 0.97 - - - - - - - 0.97 15.10 0.97 137.30 << 0.99 0.97 - - - -- - ----- -- 0.97<< 15.20 0.94 137.30 0.99 0.97 --- --- --- --- ---- ---- -- 0.97 15.30 0.92 137.29 0.99 0.97 --- ----- - ---- --- --- - 0.97 15.40 0.89 137.29 0.99 0.96 -- --- _-_ ___ ____ ____ ____ 0.96 15.50 0.86 137.29 0.99 0.96 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.96 15.60 0.83 137.29 0.98 0.96 - - - - --- - - 0.96 15.70 0.81 137.28 0.98 0.96 - - - -- -- -- -=-- 0.96 15.80 0.78 137.28 0.98 0.96 - -- --- --- --- ---- --- 0.96 15.90 0.75 137.27 0.97 0.95 ---- - --- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.95 16.00 0.72 137.26 0.97 0.95 --- ---- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.95 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EA] Outflow (hm) efs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.10 0.70 137.25 0.96 0.95 ---- ---- - --- ---- -- ---- 0.95 16.20 0.67 137.25 0.95 0.94 ----- ----- ---- --- ---_ - ---- 0.94 16.30 0.66 137.24 0.95 0.94 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.94 16.40 0.64 137.23 0.94 0.93 - - - - - - - 0.93 16.50 0.63 137.22 0.93 0.93 - - --- ---- - -- ----- 0.93 16.60 0.62 137.21 0.93 0.92 ---- --- ----- ---- --- ---- ---- 0.92 16.70 0.60 137.20 0.92 0.92 --- ---- -- ---- --- - ---- 0.92 16.80 0.59 137.19 0.92 0.91 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.91 16.90 0.58 137.17 0.92 0.91 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.91 17.00 0.57 137.16 0.92 0.90 - - - - - ---- - 0.90 17.10 0.56 137.15 0.91 0.90 - -- -- --- --- -- -- 0.90 17.20 0.54 137.14 0.91 0.89 ----- --- ---- ----- --- ---- -- 0.89 17.30 0.53 137.13 0.91 0.89 ---- -- -- --- -- -__ -__ 0.89 17.40 0.52 137.12 0.91 0.88 ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- ----- 0.88 17.50 0.51 137.11 0.91 0.87 ----- ----- ----- ----- -- - ---- ----- 0.87 17.60 0.49 137.09 0.90 0.87 - ----- - - ----- - ----- 0.87 17.70 0.48 137.08 0.89 0.86 --- --- ----- ----- - --- -- 0.86 17.80 0.47 137.07 0.88 0.85 ---- ---- --- ---_ ---- -- -- 0.85 17.90 0.46 137.06 0.87 0.85 --- -- ----- - ---- --- -- 0.85 18.00 0.44 137.04 0.85 0.84 ----- --- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- 0.84 18.10 0.43 137.03 0.84 0.83 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.83 18.20 0.42 137.02 0.83 0.83 -- - - - - - ----- 0.83 18.30 0.42 137.00 0.82 0.82 --- -- -- ---- ---- -- -- 0.82 18.40 0.41 136.99 0.82 0.81 --- ---- ---- -- --- --- -- 0.81 18.50 0.41 136.97 0.82 0.80 --_ -_ -_ ___ _____ ___ -_ 0.80 18.60 0.40 136.96 0.82 0.80 ---- ---- ---- --- --- --- ---- 0.80 18.70 0.40 136.95 0.82 0.79 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.79 18.80 0.40 136.93 0.82 0.78 - - --- - -- --- - 0.78 18.90 0.39 136.92 0.82 0.77 ----- -- - - - -_- -- - 0.77 19.00 0.39 136.90 0.82 0.76 ---- ---- -__ -_ ____ _-_ ___ 0.76 19.10 0.38 136.89 0.81 0.76 - -- --_ -- ----- --- ---- 0.76 19.20 0.38 136.88 0.80 0.75 ---- --__ _____ _____ ____ __- ____ 0.75 19.30 0.38 136.86 0.79 0.74 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.74 19.40 0.37 136.85 0.78 0.73 - - - - - - - 0.73 19.50 0.37 136.84 0.77 0.72 ---- ----- ---- --- ---- - -- --- 0.72 19.60 0.37 136.83 0.76 0.72 --- --- ----- -_- -- ----- 0.72 19.70 0.36 136.81 0.75 0.71 ____ ____ -_ ____ -__ -_ ____ 0.71 19.80 0.36 136.80 0.74 0.70 ---- ____ -_- ___ ____ ____ __- 0.70 19.90 0.35 136.79 0.73 0.69 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.69 20.00 0.35 136.78 0.72 0.69 ---- - - - - - ----- 0.69 20.10 0.35 136.76 0.71 0.68 ----- -- - - -- ---- ---- ----- 0.68 20.20 0.34 136.75 0.70 0.67 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- - --- 0.67 20.30 0.34 136.74 0.69 0.66 ---- -_ ___ ___ _____ - ___ 0.66 20.40 0.34 136.73 0.68 0.65 --- ___ - ----- ____ __ __ ____ 0.65 20.50 0.33 136.72 0.67 0.65 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.65 20.60 0.33 136.71 0.67 0.64 - - ---- - - ----- - 0.64 20.70 0.32 136.70 0.66 0.63 ----- -- - - -- -- - 0.63 20.80 0.32 136.68 0.65 0.62 -- -- --- --- ---- --- --- 0.62 20.90 0.32 136.67 0.64 0.61 -- -- - --- -- - -- 0.61 21.00 0.31 136.66 0.63 0.61 ----- ----- __- -_ ____ -__ _- 0.61 21.10 0.31 136.65 0.63 0.60 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.60 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A CIv B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EAR Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.20 0.31 136.64 0.62 0.59 -- --- - - ---- -- -- 0.59 21.30 0.30 136.63 0.61 0.58 ----- ---- ---- --- ___ __- ___ 0.58 21.40 0.30 136.62 0.61 0.58 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.58 21.50 0.29 136.61 0.60 0.57 - - ----- - - - - 0.57 21.60 0.29 136.60 0.59 0.56 - ---- -- - -__ ____ _____ 0.56 21.70 0.29 136.59 0.58 0.55 ---- ---- ---- --- --- -- -- 0.55 21.80 0.28 136.58 0.57 0.55 ----- -- --- -- ---- -- ---- 0.55 21.90 0.28 136.57 0.56 0.54 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- ----- 0.54 22.00 0.27 136.57 0.55 0.53 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.53 22.10 0.31 136.56 0.54 0.52 - - - - - - - 0.52 22.20 0.34 136.55 0.53 0.52 -- -- --- - --- ----- ---- 0.52 22.30 0.33 136.54 0.52 0.51 -- ---- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.51 22.40 0.31 136.54 0.52 0.50 ----- -- - -- ----- - ---- 0.50 22.50 0.29 136.53 0.51 0.50 ----- ---- --- ---- ---- --- --- 0.50 22.60 0.28 136.52 0.50 0.49 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.49 22.70 0.27 136.51 0.49 0.49 - ----- ---- - - - - 0.49 22.80 0.27 136.51 0.48 0.48 - ----- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.48 22.90 0.27 136.50 0.47 0.47 - ---- ---- ---- --- --- --- 0.47 23.00 0.26 136.49 0.47 0.46 --- -- -- - --- ---- -- 0.46 23.10 0.26 136.48 0.46 0.46 ---- ---- ---- --- --- ----- -- 0.46 23.20 0.26 136.48 0.46 0.45 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.45 23.30 0.26 136.47 0.45 0.44 ----- - ----- - - ----- - 0.44 23.40 0.25 136.46 0.45 0.44 ---- ---- - -- ----- --- --- 0.44 23.50 0.25 136.46 0.44 0.43 ---- --- ---- ---- --- ---- -- 0.43 23.60 0.25 136.45 0.44 0.42 --- --- --- ----- -- -- ---- 0.42 23.70 0.24 136.45 0.43 0.41 --- ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- 0.41 23.80 0.24 136.44 0.43 0.41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.41 23.90 0.24 136.43 0.43 0.40 - - ---- - - - - 0.40 24.00 0.23 136.43 0.42 0.40 -- -- - -- -- -- ---- 0.40 24.10 0.19 136.42 0.42 0.39 --- ---- -- --- ---- --- -- 0.39 24.20 0.12 136.41 0.41 0.38 -- --- --- --- ---- ---- --- 0.38 24.30 0.06 136.40 0.41 0.37 ---- ---- ---- -- ---- ----- --- 0.37 24.40 0.02 136.39 0.39 0.35 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 0.35 24.50 0.00 136.38 0.37 0.34 - - -- - - ----- - 0.34 24.60 0.00 136.37 0.36 0.32 - --- ----- -- - ---- --- -- 0.32 24.70 0.00 136.36 0.34 0.31 ---- ---- --- _--- ---- -- -- 0.31 24.80 0.00 136.34 0.32 0.29 -- ----- ___ __-_ ___ ___ - - 0.29 24.90 0.00 136.33 0.31 0.28 ----- --- ---- --- ---- ----- ----- 0.28 25.00 0.00 136.32 0.29 0.27 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.27 25.10 0.00 136.32 0.28 0.26 - ----- - - _- ---- - 0.26 25.20 0.00 136.31 0.27 0.24 -- -- ----- ---- ---- -- ----- 0.24 25.30 0.00 136.30 0.26 0.23 0.23 25.40 0.00 136.29 0.25 0.22 -- -- --- --- -- - ---- 0.22 25.50 0.00 136.28 0.23 0.21 -- -_ ____ _____ _-_ _____ ____ 0.21 25.60 0.00 136.27 0.22 0.20 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.20 25.70 0.00 136.27 0.22 020 - - - - - - 0.20 ...End Hydrograph Report fie, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.23 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = detention basin Max. Elevation = 137.94 ft Max. Storage = 37,336 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=48,657 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time inflow Elevation CIv A CIv B CIv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EXHI Outflow (hrs) cfs• ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 11.85 136.38 0.38 0.35 --- -- -- -- ----- --- --- 0.35 12.20 14.09<< 136.85 0.78 0.73 -- -- ---- ----- --- ---- --- 0.73 12.30 13.24 136.33 0.30 0.27 ----- ----- -__ ___ _____ ---- _____ 0.27 12.40 11.29 136.75 0.70 0.67 - - - - - - - 0.67 12.50 8.50 137.07 0.88 0.86 -- --- --- ---- --- --- --- 0.86 12.60 5.98 137.28 0.98 0.96 ---- --- -- -- ---- -- --- - 0.96 12.70 4.45 137.42 1.03 1.02 --_ _____ _-_ _____ __ ___ __- 1.02 12.80 3.47 137.52 1.09 1.07 ---_ _____ -__ ____ ____ -__ ___ 1.07 12.90 2.89 137.59 1.10 1.09 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 1.09 13.00 2.57 137.64 1.14 1.12 ---- - - - - - - 1.12 13.10 2.35 137.69 1.18 1.13 --- - -- -- --- --- - 1.13 13.20 2.17 137.73 1.19 1.15 ---- --- ----- -- -- ---- --- 1.15 13.30 2.04 137.76 1.19 1.16 -- --- - --- -- --- ---- 1.16 13.40 1.95 137.78 1.19 1.17 ---- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 1.17 13.50 1.88 137.81 1.19 1.18 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- 1.18 13.60 1.82 137.83 1.20 1.19 - - - - - - - 1.19 13.70 1.76 137.85 1.20 1.20 ---- - -- ----- ---- - - 1.20 13.80 1.70 137.87 1.21 1.20 ---- ----- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- 1.20 13.90 1.63 137.88 1.21 1.21 --- ---- ----- ----- -- --- --- 1.21 14.00 1.57 137.90 1.21 1.21 --___ ____ --- ___ ____ ____ ___ 1.21 14.10 1.51 137.91 1.22 1.22 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.22 14.20 1.45 137.91 1.23 1.22 - - - - - --- - 1.22 14.30 1.41 137.92 1.23 1.22 --- ----- -- ----- --- -- - -- 1.22 14.40 1.37 137.93 1.24 1.22 ---- ----- --- --- - ----- ----- 1.22 14.50 1.34 137.93 1.24 1.23 --- ---- -- ____ ____ _____ -__ 1.23 14.60 1.31 137.94 1.24 1.23 ---- --- ___ ____ ____ ___ __- 1.23 14.70 1.28 137.94 1.24 1.23 --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- --- 1.23 14.80 1.25 137.94 1.24 1.23 - - - - - - - 1.23 14.90 1.22 137.94<< 1.24 1.23 -- --- - _- - -- --- 1.23<< 15.00 1.19 137.94 1.24 1.23 - -- --- ____ _____ ____ ___ 1.23 15.10 1.15 137.94 1.24 1.23 --- - -- -- - - ---- 1.23 15.20 1.12 137.93 1.24 1.23 ---- -__ -_ -_ _____ ____ _-_ 1.23 15.30 1.09 137.93 1.24 1.22 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 1.22 15.40 1.06 137.92 1.23 1.22 - - - - - - - 1.22 15.50 1.03 137.92 1.23 1.22 - ----- -- --- -- - =- 1.22 15.60 0.99 137.91 1.22 1.22 --- - ----- ____ -_ ____ ___ 1.22 15.70 0.96 137.90 1.22 1.22 -- -_- -- ----- --- ---- ----- 1.22 15.80 0.93 137.89 1.21 1.21 ----- ----- ----- --- --- ----- ---- 1.21 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 15.90 0.89 137.88 1.21 1.21 - - -- --- --- --- ----- 1.21 16.00 0.86 137.87 1.21 1.20 ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 1.20 16.10 0.83 137.86 1.20 1.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.20 16.20 0.80 137.85 1.20 1.20 - - - - - - - 1.20 16.30 0.78 137.84 1.20 1.19 - -- --- -- -- -- --- 1.19 16.40 0.76 137.82 1.19 1.19 -- --- ---- --- -- --- --- 1.19 16.50 0.75 137.81 1.19 1.18 ----- -- - - - ---- ---- 1.18 16.60 0.73 137.79 1.19 1.17 ----- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- 1.17 16.70 0.72 137.78 1.19 1.17 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- 1.17 16.80 0.70 137.76 1.19 1.16 - - - - - ----- - 1.16 16.90 0.69 137.75 1.19 1.16 ---- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1.16 17.00 0.67 137.73 1.19 1.15 --- -- ---- --- -- ---- --- 1.15 17.10 0.66 137.72 1.19 1.14 ---- -- -__ ____ _____ -__ ____ 1.14 17.20 0.64 137.70 1.19 1.14 ---- --- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- 1.14 17.30 0.63 137.68 1.17 1.13 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- 1.13 17.40 0.62 137.67 1.16 1.13 ----- - - ----- - - - 1.13 17.50 0.60 137.65 1.14 1.12 ----- --- --- ---- ----- -- - -- 1.12 17.60 0.59 137.63 1.13 1.11 --- --- ----- ---- --- -- ---- 1.11 17.70 0.57 137.62 1.11 1.10 --- ---- --_ _-_ _-_ ___ ____ 1.10 17.80 0.56 137.60 1.10 1.10 ---- ---- ----- ---- --- ---- ---- 1.10 17.90 0.54 137.58 1.10 1.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.09 18.00 0.53 137.56 1.09 1.08 - - - - - - ----- 1.08 18.10 0.51 137.54 1.09 1.07 ---- -- --- --- ---- ---- ---- 1.07 18.20 0.50 137.52 1.09 1.07 ---- ---- ----- ----- -- ----- ---- 1.07 18.30 0.49 137.51 1.09 1.06 --- ----- --_ -- -- ---- ----- 1.06 18.40 0.49 137.49 1.08 1.05 -- ----- ---- --- --- ---- ----- 1.05 18.50 0.48 137.47 1.06 1.04 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 1.04 18.60 0.48 137.45 1.05 1.03 - - - ---- - - --- 1.03 18.70 0.47 137.43 1.04 1.03 ---- --- --- --- --- --- ---- 1.03 18.80 0.47 137.41 1.02 1.02 --- -- ---- ---- -- ---- --- 1.02 18.90 0.46 137.39 1.01 1.01 -- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 1.01 19.00 0.46 137.38 1.01 1.00 --- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.00 19.10 0.46 137.36 1.01 0.99 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.99 19.20 0.45 137.34 1.00 0.99 - - - - - ----- - 0.99 19.30 0.45 137.32 1.00 0.98 --- --- --- -- --- ---- ----- 0.98 19.40 0.44 137.31 1.00 0.97 --- --- ---- ---- --- ---- --- 0.97 19.50 0.44 137.29 0.99 0.96 -- -- -- -- ----- --- - 0.96 19.60 0.43 137.27 0.97 0.95 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- 0.95 19.70 0.43 137.25 0.96 0.95 ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.95 19.80 0.42 137.24 0.95 0.94 - - - - - - - 0.94 19.90 0.42 137.22 0.94 0.93 ----- --- ---- -- ----- ---- - -- 0.93 20.00 0.42 137.20 0.92 0.92 ---- ---- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.92 20.10 0.41 137.19 0.92 0.91 - - - -- ----- -- -- 0.91 20.20 0.41 137.17 0.92 0.91 --_- --- -- -- ----- -- --- 0.91 20.30 0.40 137.15 0.91 0.90 ---- ---- --- --- ----- ---- ----- 0.90 20.40 0.40 137.14 0.91 0.89 - ----- ----- - - - ----- 0.89 20.50 0.39 137.12 0.91 0.88 - ----- -- - --- -- ---- 0.88 20.60 0.39 137.10 0.90 0.87 ----- --- --- - -- -- ---- 0.87 20.70 0.38 137.09 0.89 0.86 -- ----- ----- --- -- --- ---- 0.86 20.80 0.38 137.07 0.88 0.86 --- -- --- --- -- - ---- 0.86 20.90 0.37 137.06 0.87 0.85 --- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.85 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A CIv B CIv C CIv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs It cfs efs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.00 0.37 137.04 0.85 0.84 -- -- -- - --- - - --- 0.84 21.10 0.37 137.02 0.84 0.83 =---- --- ----- ----- ---- - -- -- 0.83 21.20 0.36 137.01 0.83 0.82 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.82 21.30 0.36 136.99 0.82 0.82 - - - - - - - 0.82 21.40 0.35 136.98 0.82 0.81 -- -- - - -- --- - 0.81 21.50 0.35 136.96 0.82 0.80 ----- ---- --- ---- ----- --- --- 0.80 21.60 0.34 136.95 0.82 0.79 ---- -- ---- --- ____ ____ ___ 0.79 21.70 0.34 136.93 0.82 0.78 ---- -- - --- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.78 21.80 0.33 136.91 0.82 0.77 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0.77 21.90 0.33 136.90 0.82 0.76 - - - - - ---- - 0.76 22.00 0.32 136.88 0.80 0.75 - ---- --- --- ---- -- - 0.75 22.10 0.36 136.87 0.79 0.74 --- --- --- --- ---- --- ---- 0.74 22.20 0.41 136.86 0.78 0.73 -- --- -- ---- -- --- ---- 0.73 22.30 0.39 136.84 0.77 0.73 --- -_- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.73 22.40 0.37 136.83 0.76 0.72 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.72 22.50 0.35 136.82 0.75 0.71 - - ----- - - ----- ----- 0.71 22.60 0.33 136.80 0.74 0.70 -- -- -- -- -- ----- - 0.70 22.70 0.32 136.79 0.73 0.70 -- -- ---- ---- -- ----- ---- 0.70 22.80 0.32 136.78 0.72 0.69 --- ----- ---- --- -- ----- --- 0.69 22.90 0.32 136.76 0.71 0.68 ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- --- ---- 0.68 23.00 0.31 136.75 0.70 0.67 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.67 23.10 0.31 136.74 0.69 0.66 - - - ---- - - - 0.66 23.20 0.30 136.73 0.68 0.65 ----- -- -- ---- ---- -- - -- 0.65 23.30 0.30 136.71 0.67 0.64 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- -- 0.64 23.40 0.30 136.70 0.66 0.64 0.64 23.50 0.29 136.69 0.65 0.63 --- ---- ---- ----- --- -- -- 0.63 23.60 0.29 136.68 0.65 0.62 ---- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.62 23.70 0.29 136.67 0.64 0.61 ----- ---- --- - -- - - 0.61 23.80 0.28 136.66 0.63 0.60 ---- -- --- ----- --- --- --- 0.60 23.90 0.28 136.64 0.62 0.59 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.59 24.00 0.28 136.63 0.61 0.58 --- --- ----- ---- --- --- ---- 0.58 24.10 0.23 136.62 0.60 0.57 --- --- ---- ----- --- --- ---- 0.57 24.20 0.14 136.61 0.59 0.56 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.56 24.30 0.07 136.59 0.58 0.55 --- ---- -- ---- - - - 0.55 24.40 0.02 136.57 0.56 0.54 - - -- -- - -- -- 0.54 24.50 0.00 136.55 0.54 0.52 ---- -- ---- --_ _- ____ ____ 0.52 24.60 0.00 136.54 0.51 0.50 ---- ----- --- -- - -- -- 0.50 24.70 0.00 136.52 0.49 0.49 ---- ---- ----- ---- --- --- ---- 0.49 24.80 0.00 136.50 0.47 0.47 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- 0.47 24.90 0.00 136.48 0.46 0.46 ---- ----- - - - - ----- 0.46 25.00 0.00 136.47 0.45 0.44 ----- -- --- -- ----- ---- ----- 0.44 25.10 0.00 136.45 0.44 0.42 -- -- ---- --- --- - --- --- 0.42 25.20 0.00 136.44 0.43 0.41 - ----- -- --- -- ----- ---- 0.41 25.30 0.00 136.42 0.42 0.39 -- _-_ __- _____ _-_ ____ ____ 0.39 25.40 0.00 136.41 0.41 0.38 ----- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.38 25.50 0.00 136.40 0.40 0.36 - - - - - - - 0.36 25.60 0.00 136.38 0.38 0.35 - - ---- ----- - ---- -- 0.35 25.70 0.00 136.37 0.36 0.33 ----- ----- --- -- -- --- ----- 0.33 25.80 0.00 136.36 0.35 0.31 - ----- ----- - -- ----- --- 0.31 25.90 0.00 136.35 0.33 0.30 ---- -- ---- -_ ___ ___ ____ 0.30 26.00 0.00 136.34 0.31 0.29 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.29 Continues on next page... Page 4 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 26.10 0.00 136.33 0.30 0.27 ----- -- -- --- -- -- ----- 0.27 26.20 0.00 136.32 0.29 0.26 ---- ---- ----- ---- -- - ----- --- 0.26 26.30 0.00 136.31 0.27 0.25 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.25 ...End Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.45 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = detention basin Max. Elevation = 138.61 ft Max. Storage = 45,339 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=61,788 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs , ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 14.45 136.73 0.69 0.66 --- -__ ___ _____ -_ ___ -__ 0.66 12.30 15.88 136.87 0.79 0.74 ---- --- -- --- -- --- - 0.74 12.40 13.46 137.33 1.00 0.98 ---- ----- ----- ---- --- ----- -- 0.98 12.50 10.08 137.69 1.18 1.13 - ---- - - - - 1.13 12.60 7.06 137.93 1.24 1.23 - ---- - - ---- - - 1.23 12.70 5.24 138.09 1.29 1.28 ----- ---- -- _- -- - --- 1.28 12.80 4.07 138.18 1.38 1.31 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 1.31 12.90 3.40 138.26 1.40 1.34 ---- -___ ___ _- -__ ___ _- 134 13.00 3.01 138.31 1.40 1.36 ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 1.36 13.10 2.75 138.36 1.40 1.37 - - - - - - - 1.37 13.20 2.54 138.39 1.40 1.38 -- --- ----- - -- ----- - 1.38 13.30 2.38 138.43 1.42 1.39 -- ___ _____ ___ - _____ ____ 1.39 13.40 2.28 138.45 1.45 1.40 --- ----- -- -- - --- --- --- 1.40 13.50 2.20 138.48 1.48 1.41 --- --- ---- -- ---- --- ---- 1.41 13.60 2.13 138.50 1.50 1.42 --- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- 1.42 13.70 2.05 138.52 1.50 1.42 - - - --- - - - 1.42 13.80 1.98 138.54 1.50 1.43 -- - -- ---- - - ---- 1.43 13.90 1.90 138.55 1.50 1.43 --- ---- -- --- -- -- ---- 1.43 14.00 1.83 138.57 1.50 1.44 --- ----- --- ---- --- __-- _____ 1.44 14.10 1.76 138.58 1.50 1.44 -- ---- --- --- ---- _____ __- 1.44 14.20 1.69 138.58 1.50 1.44 -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- _____ 1.44 14.30 1.64 138.59 1.50 1.45 - - - - - - - 1.45 14.40 1.60 138.60 1.50 1.45 1.45 14.50 1.56 138.60 1.50 1.45 --- --- --- ---- --- --- ---- 1.45 14.60 1.53 138.60 1.50 1.45 --- --- -- --- -- _- ___ 145 14.70 1.49 138.61 1.50 1.45 -- -- -- -- -- --- --- 1.45 14.80 1.45 138.61 << 1.50 1.45 --- ---- --- ---- -__- _____ ___ 1.45<< 14.90 1.42 138.61 1.50 1.45 - - - - - - - 1.45 15.00 1.38 138.60 1.50 1.45 -- - - --- - -- - 1.45 15.10 1.34 138.60 1.50 1.45 -- -- --- --- ---_ ___ ___ 1.45 15.20 1.31 138.60 1.50 1.45 - --- -- ____ -_ _____ ___ 1.45 15.30 1.27 138.59 1.50 1.45 -- --_ ____ ___ -_ -_ -_ 1.45 15.40 1.23 138.59 1.50 1.44 ----- ----- _--- ----- ----- ____ ____ 1.44 15.50 1.19 138.58 1.50 1.44 ---- -- -- ____ - _ - 1.44. 15.60 1.15 138.57 1.50 1.44 -- --__ -_ -__ -_ 1.44 15.70 1.11 138.56 1.50 1.44 -- -- -- -_ _ _ ___ ____ 1.44 15.80 1.08 138.55 1.50 1.43 ---- ---- --__ _- ____ _____ __- 1.43 15.90 1.04 138.54 1.50 1.43 - ---_ -- ----- _____ ----- ____ 1.43 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A CIv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI Outflow (hm) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.00 1.00 138.53 1.50 1.43 -- -- ----- -- ----- -- --- 1.43 16.10 0.96 138.52 1.50 1.42 ----- ---- ----- --- ----- ---- ---- 1.42 16.20 0.93 138.50 1.50 1.42 ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- 1.42 16.30 0.90 138.49 1.48 1.41 - - - - --- ----- - 1.41 16.40 0.88 138.47 1.47 1.41 - ----- --- --- --- --- --- 1.41 16.50 0.87 138.46 1.45 1.40 ----- ----- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1.40 16.60 0.85 138.44 1.44 1.40 -- ---- ---- ---- -- - -- ----- 1.40 16.70 0.83 138.42 1.42 1.39 -- -__ __ ____ ___ -__ _____ 1.39 16.80 0.82 138.41 1.40 1.39 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 1.39 16.90 0.80 138.39 1.40 1.38 - ---- - - - - - 1.38 17.00 0.78 138.37 1.40 1.38 - ---- ----- -_- -- - - --- 1.38 17.10 0.76 138.35 1.40 1.37 --- ---- --- ---- -- --- --- 1.37 17.20 0.75 138.34 1.40 1.36 -- - -- --- -- ---- ---- 1.36 17.30 0.73 138.32 1.40 1.36 ---- --- - -- ---- ---- ---- --- 1.36 17.40 0.71 138.30 1.40 1.35 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.35 17.50 0.70 138.28 1.40 1.35 ---- ----- - - - - - 1.35 17.60 0.68 138.26 1.40 1.34 --- -- -- ---- --- - --- 1.34 17.70 0.66 138.24 1.40 1.33 --- ---- --- ----- ---- ---- ----- 1.33 17.80 0.64 138.22 1.40 1.33 - --- ---- --- ----- ---- ---- 1.33 17.90 0.63 138.20 1.40 1.32 --- ---- --_ ____ _-_ ___ __- 1.32 18.00 0.61 138.18 1.37 1.31 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 1.31 18.10 0.59 138.16 1.35 1.31 - - - - - - - 1.31 18.20 0.58 138.14 1.33 1.30 ----- -- ---- ----- --- --- ---- 1.30 18.30 0.57 138.11 1.31 1.29 ---- ---- ---- --- -- ----- ---- 1.29 18.40 0.56 138.09 1.29 1.28 -- -- ---- ---- -_ -__ ----- 1.28 18.50 0.56 138.07 1.29 1.28 --- -- ____ _-_ ___ -_ ____ 1.28 18.60 0.55 138.05 1.29 1.27 ----- ---- ----- ---- --- ----- ---- 1.27 18.70 0.55 138.03 1.29 1.26 - - - - - - - 1.26 18.80 0.54 138.01 1.29 1.25 - -- - --- ---- --- ---- 1.25 18.90 0.54 137.99 1.28 1.25 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- 1.25 19.00 0.53 137.96 1.26 1.24 --- -__ -__ ____ -_ -__ -_ 1.24 19.10 0.53 137.94 1.24 1.23 -- ---- --- ---- ----- ----- --- 1.23 19.20 0.52 137.92 1.23 1.22 ---- - --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 1.22 19.30 0.52 137.89 1.21 1.21 - - - ---- - - - 1.21 19.40 0.51 137.87 1.21 1.20 --- -- - --- -- ---- -- -- --- 1.20 19.50 0.51 137.85 1.20 1.19 - - _____ ___ _-__ --_ _____ 1.19 19.60 0.50 137.82 1.19 1.19 ----- -- -- --_ ____ ___ ____ 1.19 19.70 0.50 137.80 1.19 1.18 -- ---- - ---- ---- --- ---- 1.18 19.80 0.49 137.78 1.19 1.17 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 1.17 19.90 0.49 137.76 1.19 1.16 - - - - - - - 1.16 20.00 0.48 137.73 1.19 1.15 - - - --- -- ---- ---- 1.15 20.10 0.47 137.71 1.19 1.14 -- --- ---- ---- --- ----- ----- 1.14 2010 0.47 137.69 1.18 1.13 --- ---- ____ ____ M__ -__ ___ 1.13 20.30 0.46 137.67 1.16 1.13 --- --- -- ---- ---- --- ---- 1.13 20.40 0.46 137.65 1.14 1.12 --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 1.12 20.50 0.45 137.62 1.12 1.11 - - - ----- - - - 1.11 20.60 0.45 137.60 1.10 1.10 -- ----- - - ----- -- 1.10 20.70 0.44 137.58 1.10 1.09 --- ----- ----- --- --- ---- --- 1.09 20.80 0.44 137.56 1.09 1.08 - --- - - -- --- --- 1.08 20.90 0.43 137.54 1.09 1.07 ---. ----- - --- --- ____ -__ 1.07 21.00 0.43 137.52 1.09 1.06 ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- 1.06 Continues on next page_.. Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A CIv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExH1 Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.10 0.42 137.50 1.09 1.06 - - --- -- --- -- --- - 1.06 21.20 0.42 137.48 1.07 1.05 =--- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- 1.05 21.30 0.41 137.45 1.05 1.04 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- --- 1.04 21.40 0.41 137.43 1.04 1.03 - - - ----- - - - 1.03 21.50 0.40 137.41 1.02 1.02 -- - --- --- --- --- ----- 1.02 21.60 0.40 137.39 1.01 1.01 ----- ---- -- ---- _--_ __- ___ 1.01 21.70 0.39 137.37 1.01 1.00 - -- - --- -- - ---- 1.00 21.80 0.39 137.35 1.00 0.99 --- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- -- 0.99 21.90 0.38 137.33 1.00 0.98 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.98 22.00 0.37 137.31 1.00 0.97 - -- - - - - - 0.97 22.10 0.42 137.29 0.99 0.97 - --- -- --- -- - -_- - - 0.97 22.20 0.47 137.28 0.98 0.96 ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.96 22.30 0.45 137.26 0.97 0.95 -- -- -- -- ---- -- --- 0.95 22.40 0.43 137.24 0.95 0.94 - --- -- -- ----- -- ---- 0.94 22.50 0.40 137.23 0.94 0.93 ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 0.93 22.60 0.38 137.21 0.93 0.93 --- - - - - - - 0.93 22.70 0.37 137.19 0.92 0.92 - -- -- - --- -- - 0.92 22.80 0.37 137.17 0.92 0.91 -- ---- ---- -- --- --- -- 0.91 22.90 0.36 137.15 0.91 0.90 ----- --- -- - --- ---- --- 0.90 23.00 0.36 137.14 0.91 0.89 - -_- ---- --- --- --- ---- 0.89 23.10 0.36 137.12 0.91 0.88 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.88 23.20 0.35 137.10 0.90 0.87 - ----- - ---- ---- - - 0.87 23.30 0.35 137.08 0.89 0.86 - --- ---- --- ----- --- -- 0.86 23.40 0.34 137.07 0.88 0.85 ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- -- 0.85 23.50 0.34 137.05 0.86 0.85 0.85 23.60 0.34 137.03 0.85 0.84 ---- --- --- --- ---- ----- ---- 0.84 23.70 0.33 137.02 0.83 0.83 ----- ---- ---- --- ----- --- ----- 0.83 23.80 0.33 137.00 0.82 0.82 - - - - - --- ----- 0.82 23.90 0.32 136.98 0.82 0.81 --- ----- -- ----- ---- -- ---- 0.81 24.00 0.32 136.97 0.82 0.80 -- --- -- ----- --- ---- ----- 0.80 24.10 0.26 136.95 0.82 0.79 ----- --- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- 0.79 24.20 0.16 136.93 0.82 0.78 ---- ----- --- --- ----- ----- -- 0.78 24.30 0.08 136.90 0.82 0.76 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.76 24.40 0.03 136.88 0.80 0.75 ----- ----- - - -- - - 0.75 24.50 0.00 136.85 0.78 0.73 -- --- ----- ----- -- --- -- 0.73 24.60 0.00 136.83 0.76 0.72 --- ---- --- --- ---- --- ----- 0.72 24.70 0.00 136.80 0.74 0.70 --__ --- _-_ __-_ ----- ----- _- 0.70 24.80 0.00 136.78 0.72 0.69 --- -- ---- --- --- ----- --- 0.69 24.90 0.00 136.75 0.70 0.67 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.67 25.00 0.00 136.73 0.68 0.65 --- ---- -- ---- ----- - --- 0.65 25.10 0.00 136.71 0.67 0.64 -- --- ---- --- ----- --- -- 0.64 25.20 0.00 136.68 0.65 0.62 ---- --- -- --- ----- -- --- 0.62 25.30 0.00 136.66 0.63 0.60 -- -- - -- -- ---- --- 0.60 25.40 0.00 136.64 0.62 0.59 ---- -__ -_ _____ __- _- -__ 0.59 25.50 0.00 136.62 0.60 0.57 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- 0.57 25.60 0.00 136.60 0.59 0.56 ----- --- - - - - - 0.56 25.70 0.00 136.58 0.56 0.54 --- ---- - --- --- ---- -- 0.54 25.80 0.00 136.56 0.54 0.52 ----- ---- ---- ----- --- --- ---- 0.52 25.90 0.00 136.54 0.52 0.51 ----- ----- -- ----- --- ----- --- 0.51 26.00 0.00 136.52 0.50 0.49 ---- _____ 0.49 26.10 0.00 136.51 0.48 0.48 ---- ----- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- 0.48 Continues on next page... Page 4 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExH1 Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 26.20 0.00 136.49 0.46 0.46 -- -- -- ----- - -- --- ---- 0.46 26.30 0.00 136.47 0.45 0.44 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- 0.44 26.40 0.00 136.46 0.44 0.43 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.43 26.50 0.00 136.44 0.43 0.41 - ----- - ---- - ----- - 0.41 26.60 0.00 136.43 0.42 0.40 -- -- --- - --- - --- 0.40 26.70 0.00 136.41 0.41 0.38 0.38 26.80 0.00 136.40 0.40 0.37 0.37 26.90 0.00 136.39 0.38 0.35 ---- -- --- ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.35 27.00 0.00 136.37 0.37 0.33 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.33 27.10 0.00 136.36 0.35 0.32 ---- -- --- --- __- _-- -- 0.32 27.20 0.00 136.35 0.33 0.30 -- ---- ----- ---- -- --- --- 0.30 ...End APPENDIX H JOB �,: 1.L A L.\,/ V, JZ .S 1`f'.,w:.. .. ... esign SHEET NO I OF' . ro essionals, inc. CALCUI.ATFD BY gs 0ATE ( ,-e /C"3 G Si N hh civil engineers •planners surveyors gi. STO1t11�t FREOUENCY I V COfY � CHECKED BY .. DATE lhin rncrs�ent A x C T.C. ILP Q Fro+r To A C r.�nc o . Tin, 11mAr efs p.'�.w; S. NOTE. . o . : Qs V L t 6 o' 6 0, 'jLi p. o o, 1,5 6019 Lz Pq c 3 I ,Ib G. 0, 3 i t 22 L), S -0, 6% c -.3 0� a 13. IJ6 3 L?II ,l $ D,5°v , b ,3 I � o � CPS 17, G o ,I— bs --------------- jJoe esign SHEET NO 2, of i . ... ........... .------- rofessionals, inc. CALCUI.ATF..D BY 0ATCi �ESi N STORM civil engineers • planners • surveyors •gi. O FREQUENCY O COri CHECKED BY ... _ DATEAm rnersres�n► A x C T.C. iPIPE Q From To A C I h G r. o _ n�in. i c h C t:,a, S: : Qys V L t NOTE OrDb r ro 0,0 ) .6 ,0-6 — � G o• ,Dt 3 �— ► r . 6 I ar o•l a o, , 3 �� o r --- -_ o a $? 0. 9 c c) bh ID -9 0,060,06 6•z0 , 3 b. O. 0, ------------- o • o,o 0 ,5 — �• ------------- D ---____ ��� APPENDIX I j Joe 3 esign 3iiEEi NO OF• professionals, inc. GAECUTATFD RY DATE DESIGN STORM FREQUENCY ec� I tivliengineers planners • surveyors • gIs CHECKED 8v . Run tncr�ent DATE A x C T.C. i Q ,- ------•-------- -- Fron► To Al C I n c r. o . M. 1 c h C :�, S; ; L?s V L t NOTE 0•`fs , 31,54 c O,o3 0, 0 ! o•o , 6 0, - c o og6 '_ a,o ° to o. 8 c O. ID,d S c D 60 ,o a, 6 n, li �� °, o d3 ° ( b� ,3 ( o 19r,Ck- nd 0, 5; V5 0. 03 ' t g ,S 30 0.0 r . j Joe I$23 resign $HE.FT NO OF professionals, inc. CALCULATFO F3v i)ATp, DESIGN STOW FREOUgN' can clvll engineers • planners surveyors gls LiQ ... CHECKED By .,.. .....— OATS ran► A X T.-!M.j. O pip From To A C I n c r. mI1 r ch t:, ; S: Q s V L t NOTE t o.3 �, d•�I o1�1 ,tom ,> , II ©. �' o, 3 SW S o, o 5, i7, 3 o a3 ° 3•5" l ► o�� o, i M— � —...__... _._ 0, ffDa, I , o g I' 3 ,.� ( I ` a o 6!� • t5 0 ° 0 6 , � �. . 1 Z6 r. 6, O ,._ —-- . t o ©, 10 6 I D o o , q,6 . o g� 3 . , o° c 6 5.3 ,30 —_ -------------- 12/05/03 FRI 12:03 FAX 401 949 0940 Village Retirement Comm. 1a002 BE.R.RYPATCHIIASSO CIA TES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP November 24,2003 Mr. Peter J. Sangermano,Jr. Village Retirenlent Communities DEC 82003 715 Putnam pike 03 Greenville,RI 02828 Re: Berry Patch Expansion Dear:Mr. Sangermmno: The ',Gown of South Windsor has recommended that we obtain emez enc Over the Village at Buekland Court property. Attached is a plan(the "Plan,) entitled� easement erry Patch IZ Site Development Plan/Special Exception,Buckland,Road&Deming Street Sou Windsor, Connecticut, prepared by Design Pr.ofessionals, Inc., November 4, 2003, Sheets f B and Sheet 4 depicting the proposed location of the emergency access easement. PIease also no that there is a sidewalk adjacent to the emergency access easement which is strictly.for pedestrian use. We .have assured you that (1) the emergency access easement will be for emergency purposes only, (2) the emergency access easement and the sidewalk will be constructed and maintained (lawn, snow, ice, plantings, etc.) so Long as it is in existence at our cost, and shall be subject to your approval on aesthetic details and appearance. We have further assured you that we will provide you with an indemnification from liability relating to the emergency access easement and sidewalk and that we will provide you with certificates aof insurance annually. In consideration of the granting of the Partners emergency easement, Bei�y Patch Iz Associates Limited hip agrees to, at its cost (including without limitation, site grading, as Parking lines and landscaping), to construct up to twenty (20) parking spaces p oat, d nearpainting the Gazebo in the area designated.by The Village at Buckland Court' Furthermore, the Plan shows an 8"PVC sewer tie-in at the entrance to the Village at Buckla nd Co"�t• We haVe assured you that the sewer lateral construction tie-in will be performed 1 with the minimum of disturbance to your daily operation., ( ) The undersigned will bear all costs and.expenses of constructing sarne, including but no limitapprove. to policeman to direct traffic in the event that you. feel that:is necessary. The undersigned will also maintain said sewer lateral for so long as the Berry`Patch Apartment Community is in existence. 6 Executive Drina,Suite 100 • Farmm9t0n,'CT 06032 2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-691-9 k'ax parWent OcvelopmCnlslIIertyPatch tlV.cuerslSa�U,' �nP octepe 011.2d.03.doc 12/05/03 FRI 12:03 FAX 401 949 0940 Village Retirement Comm. l�003 All of the foregoing is intended to be memorialized in an easement agreement, the tcros of which are subject to Village at Buckland Court approval and shall be recorded on the South Windsor land records in the event that the South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission grants approvals for the proposed Berry Patch expansion. Would you kindly acknowledge your agreement in concept with the foregoing, by signing and returning to me the enclosed copy of this letter? Thank you. Very Truly Yours, BERRY PATCH B ASSOCIATES LIMITBD PARTNERSHIP By: Berry Patch B Gp,LLc B Geoffrey W, er embe AGREED AND ACCEPTED By: Name: �i" Title: Date: / p Marcia ach- RE: 8-399 statutes From: "Geoff Sager"<gsager@metro-realty.com> To: Marcia Banach...<banach@southwindsor.org> Date: 11/14/03 12:34PM Subject: RE: 8-30g statutes Marcia, the technical question in par. 1 1 forwarded to Tim Hollister. I do not believe that a zone change is necessary. It is our intention to provide you with an affordability plan. I can have that to you early next week. In simple terms, 80% of the development will be affordable to households with incomes of 60%of Below of the Hartford area PMSA. -----Original Message----- From: Marcia Banach [malito:banach@southwindsor.org] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:46 AM To: Geoff Sager Subject: 8-30g statutes Hi Geoff, I'm doing some homework&reviewing the 8-30 statutes in connection with your Berry Patch 11 application.We're getting opposition calls from neighbors so I want to make sure we're all statute-compliant. My question for you is: I can't see where the 8-30G statutes let us off the hook for a zone change for the Gateway property. I do see section 8-30g(8)(c)which talks about what to do when a zone change is involved, but that section just requires a concept site plan with the zone change application. Is there something I'm missing, or some case law that supports not having to seek the zone change? Also, section 8-30g(8)(b)(1) has some document filing requirements that need to be addressed (the affordability plan). Even though you have indicated your intention of not filing suit, it seems like a good idea to at least follow the format of 8-30g, ok? Thanks. Marcia Banach, AICP Director of Planning - Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave, South Windsor, CT 06074 860-644-2511 x 253 banach@southwindsor.org www.southwindsor.org CC: <thollister@goodwin.com>, "Peter Dunn"<pdunn@metro-realty.com> From: "Hollister, Timothy"<THollister@Goodwin.com> To: <banach@southwindsor.org> Date: 11/16/03 11:53AM Subject: 8-30g Marcia: The authority for proceeding with an affordable housing development that does not comply with the underlying zoning, but without a zone change, comes from a 1995 Appellate Court decision (which because it is an appeals court is binding everywhere)called Wisniowski v Planning Commission. In the case the court approved an affordable development proposed on half acre lots in a one acre zone, and held that noncompliance with the underlying zoning regulations, being essentially a matter of policy, was not a"sustatntial public interest"that a commission may use to deny an application. Zone changes are often used (especially by our office) because they avoid non-conforming use issues and make the approval one bit less complex, but the technique of proceeding without this is perfectly legal, and is used in situations just like this one. Let me know if you need more. PS-We are just about finished with our article on the Wilton case for the CCAPA Newsletter. If you absolutely need it before the end of the day Tuesday please call. Thanks Timothy S. Hollister Shipman &Goodwin LLP One American Row Hartford, Conn. 06103-2819 860-251-5601 Fax 860-251-5699 thollister@goodwin.com http://www.shipmangoodwin.com CC: <gsager@metro-realty.com> Pastor KL. Gustafson Calvary Church 400 Buckland Road South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Telephone 1860) 644-1102 November 18, 2003 Ms. Marcia Banach Town Planner Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms. Banach: Please be advised that Peter DeMallie of Design Professionals, Inc., is hereby authorized to sign on my behalf, for the Metro Realty Group Senior Housing proposal (also known as Berry Patch Expansion), all applications including but not limited to (1) Site Plan Approval, (2) Special Exception, (3) Inland Wetlands, (4) Water Pollution Control Authority, and (5) any other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Berry Patch expansion proposal. Very truly yours, By: Pastor K.L. Guhafson Kelli Koehler- RE In house referral fora 103-83P, Per Patch If„ ry Pa e 1 From: "William Lanning"<WLanning@southwindsorfire.org> To: "Kelli Koehler"<koehle@southwindsor.org> Date: 11/18/03 8:41AM Subject: RE: In house referral for appl 03-83P, Berry Patch II -----Original Message----- From: Kelli Koehler[mailto:koehle@southwindsor.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 4:18 PM To: Bob Deptula;Jeff Doolittle; Chris Dougan; Ray Favreau;Tom Field; Matt Galligan; Mike Gantick; Karl Reichle; Fred Shaw; Melvin Stead; William Lanning Subject: In house referral for appl 03-83P, Berry Patch II Please respond with comments. Thanks- Kelli Approved: I will meet with Ct.Water Co. to finalize water main and fire hydrant locations. Wm. R. Lanning SOWN St4 `� 7-own r / -Pslo/� ? 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 To: Design Professionals 165 So. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 From: Jeffrey H.Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: November 19 2003 Re: App. #03-83P -Review of the proposed Berry Patch II Elderly housing complex—Plans dated 11/04/03. I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following additional comments: Based on a field review I have determined that the proposed construction of the road and associated grading on the eastern portion of the north site will occur within five feet of the stream channel of Farm Brook. The stream channel is not represented on the proposed site plan. The stream channel in this area consists of a gravel bottom with a high potential of harboring benthic macroinvertibrates. This characteristic makes this portion of the watercourse highly valuable and especially sensitive to urban development. I am recommending that all proposed development excluded from at least 40 feet from the watercourse in this area. Furthermore,the 40 foot buffer area should be left to naturalize and form a vegetated riparian zone to protect the watercourse. CC. Town Engineer Director of Planning REMA ecological Fuss&O'Neill,Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: Geoffrey Sager,Metro Realty ` 100 FROM: Mark Vertucci, Fuss& O'Neill (r 3 CC: Ted DeSantos,RE,P.T.O.E,Fuss &O'Neill DATE: November 25, 2003 RE: Berry Patch Proposed Site Expansion Supplemental Traffic Information Watson Farms Trip Generation Count Results This memo will summarize our review of the recent traffic counts performed at the Watson Farms Adult Living Community site drive on Route 30 in South Windsor. An automatic traffic recorder(ATR)was placed on the site drive for period of one week beginning Friday, October 31, 2003 and ending Thursday, November 6, 2003. The ATR count reports have been attached to this memo. The number of vehicles entering and exiting the site drive for each weekday were reviewed during the adjacent roadway peak hours of 7:15 to 8:15 AM and 4:30 to 5:30 PM. An average number of total trips, trips entering, and trips exiting the . site during the weekday peak hours was calculated. Based on the 72 units in the development,the trip generation rates (trips per unit) for the Watson Farms community were determined. The results have been summarized in Table 1 below and compared with the trip generation rates projected for the expansion of the Berry Patch Adult Living Community: Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison: Berry Patch Projected vs.Watson Farms Observed Berry Patch Expansion Projected Watson Farms Avg. Observed Trip Generation* (96 units) Trip Generation (72 units) RATE TOTAL IN OUT RATE TOTAL IN OUT Weekday AM 0.20 20 9 11 0.31 22 4 18 Peak Hour Weekday PM 0.22 22 12 10 0.50 36 17 19 Peak Hour *Trip generation rates accepted by the State Traffic Commission(STC)for Adult Living Communities As indicated in Table 1, the actual trip generation rates counted at the Watson Farms Adult Living Community were higher during both the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. Fuss & O'Neill recalculated the expected trip generation for the Berry Patch Adult Living Community expansion based on the revised trip generation rates from the Watson Farms Adult Living Community. The revised trip generation is summarized in Table 2, along with the STC approved rates utilized by the Traffic Impact Study: FAP97\97146\A76\mgv112503a.doc f i Fuss&O'Neill,Inc. Geoffrey Sager November 25, 2003 Page 2 Table 2 Berry Patch Expansion Trip Generation Comparison: STC Rates vs. Watson Farms Rates 96 UNITS Berry Patch Projected Trip Berry Patch Projected Trip Generation (STC Rates) Generation (Watson Farms Rates) RATE TOTAL IN OUT RATE TOTAL IN OUT Weekday AM 0.20 20 9 11 0.31 30 6 24 Peak Hour Weekday PM 0.22 22 12 10 0.50 48 23 25 Peak Hour As shown in Table 2,the Watson Farms rates indicate that the distribution of traffic during the morning peak hour heavily favors exiting vehicles,which differs from the STC rates. Using the Watson Farms rates,the Berry Patch expansion would generate 10 more vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour and 26 more vehicle trips during the weekday afternoon peak hour. To verify the additional site generated traffic will have negligible impacts on the study area intersections, capacity analyses were performed at the signalized intersections of Route 30 at Felt Road and Route 30 at Route 194 and Buckland Street. Unsignalized intersection analyses were performed at the right out only site drive on Route 30 as well as the full access drive on Felt Road. The analyses reports have been attached at the end of this memo. Despite the higher trip generation rates,Route 30 and the adjacent study area intersections will not be significantly impacted. The Berry Patch site offers excellent access to the adjacent roadway network via a right in/right out only drive on Route 30 and a site drive on Felt Road,which provides vehicles easy access to the traffic signal at the Route 30 and Felt Road intersection. State Route 30 and the adjacent signalized intersection at Felt Road have ample reserve capacity to handle the additional traffic that may be experienced. The Synchro analyses revealed that the LOS at all of the study area intersections will remain unchanged in the 2005 Combined Conditions during morning peak hour, as originally projected by the analyses conducted using the STC rates. The additional site generated traffic results in a minimal increase in vehicle delay at each intersection. During the afternoon peak hour Combined condition,the intersection of Route 30 and Felt Road operates at LOS B with the Watson Farms rates as opposed to LOS A with STC rates. This intersection will still operate very efficiently with ample reserve capacity. Conclusion Traffic counts performed for a full week at the Watson Farms site drive revealed that the adult living community is generating traffic at higher rates than the STC accepted rates for FAP97U7146\A76\mgv112503a.doc — - - - -- Fuss&O'Neill,Inc. Geoffrey Sager November 25, 2003 Page 3 this type of development during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. Applying these higher trip generation rates to the 96 unit Berry Patch expansion,the proposed adult living community expansion would generate 30 more vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour and 48 more vehicle trips during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Upon distributing this traffic to the adjacent roadway network and performing additional Synchro capacity analyses,we conclude that the traffic generated by the Berry Patch development will not have a significant impact on the adjacent roadway network. Whether using the STC accepted rates or the Watson Farms observed rates,the adjacent roadway network offers excellent access and reserve capacity to accommodate the additional traffic anticipated from the Berry Patch development. F:\P97U71461A76Vngv112503 a.doc Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 1 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 27-Oct 03 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Time Exiting Entering EAting Entering 12)(Iting Entering E)dflng Entering E)dtIng Entering Exiting Entering E)dfing Entering E)dUng Entering 12:00 AM « - • • 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 , !.• .h iN' = sJY7N,t"'' .vx tMv.. 1: n,GS';v'+a+e,.°`ti -:txr a.4r ed{ Y°k� o n;.,a�..,�i 31: 1 f,r, is :. ..A `xy{, �IYYx,'::. .: -,,± .. n ,, tom. ✓�,r S�'..�i,:n""`S. J.:..1.:r, f E':: • '!cf!"'t, , 11��� ,�RfA'Ja`TU'... � '�' ".k.�. �.. ,'vf v gg �.'�(�:Y�G"S Y Ge. >>Aa 'i Y,.: 14 l ::... 1 NN 4 Y,..; 1 t W; ";, .: �: .j: ... '.: Y:S, Ny...,. ,x , .,.n ,) .:,.. ... .,a : J..,Y r"A ."J ....c.. 5 ,,, n, 4!4.. •� .,n::.. ,! 4\. ,. v `:' Y ..�. �.QQ. :..1'. u?J.0 1+`w ... �a' ,.,s.. �•�+ .. T.1 nv. L J:�:5... l `,r'h, f 7 'i Q. M,ji Q Q �•9 Q' Q :. 1 � Q� t ;V.. ,; ,u.:.R•..,a .' �3i7'L.Sw,,.a...„+A«.,�ns"J.itfUrY,SMaY,.rW�ii„�6:..�tk'�Ir..<axbA5n.81a¢Lr.ane&,a�Y:>,m t+u5¢'..,e�,ca,`w:%..f,."4...,.".,.,,r^.+,.,. ar,:3�:.:ne<,�,r�r'h.1„a#.•!u:(a,v,,,J - A...�.,,e. 1,dw .,:,4.,\.r.!,.A .«..a'.n ,.:,n.n...N.,a l'1<. .1,,, e,w. ,.,\ .,.,s... ....,. „ n,,... .. .... 02. :„0.0 . 0 0 0 .0Q. 2Q „.<.. 0Q Q1 0 �:�Yq: �. n, 0.. ,.xs 04:00 1 0 Q. 0. 0. 0 0.. 0„. ...n... .. .....,E„p„,.., .r, ....: .. E' ,.i.wrS r. .,v r,N,•r , N' ,".'.a''uf S'fi!( 1, ':..,:. ':.':i \ 5 4 1 0 .:., ..: . . r.":.' :,,- a '.. •. t.,.r. i' .,;.: .. 06:00 * * 4 3 4 3 1 3 3 3 +yfY .r`.' UH a(Va'a";i>,vtfM•a7r)kp r r< "1 vha 1 '"f Sr :.rS.,* # \;;+v \ :,#t,,:t a D f/ l K ! A r t,;r; , �: �, 7'' r aJ 754a 8 2 18 4: 5 .wIa.:o;.p,MO 1•59�,.,.:w..J7t.xp,..,Vi..Jl.r 14ara..,I.:: >< ,<,.,;'.;,:i„X ,. a�\ ... ,•„K uwYGA,Y;;>r:u.J .,..,',i:: ,.,>.„r}!l, rJ ,,,.r.:s, 5.,s:: ... 08:00 * « • • • 27 11 8 4 11 3 15 6 ,,. M ..,x..Y.. ,. ( a, 1., '... .. ry.. ,fiYY'ra 5ti..'.AM,h J� .rt•r -.;: nl Q �,. lb,:..k^';: A 9"r, "k! Sa .'if xh� ,.,:.. � si,. .� # ,. ¢ � � '� « :+x. w �r 3 14n.: :, :a # �' ♦ • ,. . .. :: ,; f ',�,: :fir .w �;. t. t :�fy,�n Y ., ,:.,, � ,.:. ',._,�. .,,,J. t(I,.n. � a.._..� , 1 J. :- :. ,�. �. ..13� .,^ „ �l5 -<, :•10.. 1;�19 ,.,.., 2 �;:..: :�.:26., '"'8�� u,.a4'���w��•.VV,I�:ya .1rR.iurJ�'M'�YS�,St+�.�'.4a,4rs.�drc,.,..:µrS,�E,M,aa�r.ni�,d.�, t,!t; a:s,S,.Jarl...r:d ,,, .,. u«�a r 5.tiCu r,., .,•x.;;'�r'�s t„ ,.,.,n , b��:., ,J? , .,..,:., K 1 1 �aJ�: 10.00 . .. ,.. .. _.,. 31 i�a•�� t�:;�x16 �.:: 13 k�:,J�,`36 ,wJ3,.bt�x18` .:.., �•f :,; Sa , . ,I�i» . t ,,a r f. Y > .t � ,a 1�, 3 N I .,: �r .• ;. , d �x, ,x., ,.:... .,:.. ,. ,: �, .. , , r .::., :,:, ,.; a .wx ia�• .,.YY M ,.r:. ,'><y tn"r.. �'s>aJt t4\xY. A R: �',., #.r.J.Y w: :.� \ rft' S.. ai.. ,,<z.. ,., i, ,Jt "4". t � 26 Y v y �m,}:,.Yy ua.�.x,�`�¢(uk»naa:.haTw,wd,t.v,ku.>u; 12:00 Nv �s pp PM * 30 19 16 12 ��„�^,29; 16 25 16 11 x �r..... ¢ ,'•:'Y p.:;.\„x 91 '...:Y .Y..r, J. , M' rJ 1 1 '... I :+.,S r W YW, i. ,... .NM. .t. J:r n(... ... '..M.. { N .I .r �Y... J. ..... .,i ., ,.., .k .!. t. ,.,:. .k,f.,'F r. 3,rn: YJ f.t )rYi \F a;.. 4;... ..J S,r, n e n.,.�ar( Pr R:,....,Y Y 1 1 \ A, , .. # #"r•; +r Y r S f, .1`a A-n•C+,, *. "B ..:... r �$$a!;. iG k y 6/ 4r S 7,1.,► A :.Y, /.,. ,...,,JC tt..; ,..w.. + .� \x; :' ` tn:, 11Y:.I5 ,• M• 1�1. ., .::,... 1,x h .., .. ...... .. ,..: .l .:.: :. .,.f. :1;? d " T.,1��f v.'•. „e,,: ':.r ,�,. h�'/� {�.� ,. c� Y \ r r ,rs9 .$8 J 17 2+4:,.:.r,. :�¢ZB. 17 .. ..2d 1,,.. .,, ,$8 ,.:. . ,?'2Q'! u&rrE,.",•5:`.",>Ru�a«�,4s:�s+'�,u, srd 4. ...,�,:o,l.,,,..< �:it? ..,w rl,<.x,{,,:..u.J 3.x.:.xJv ;u,•r.,, n rc,.r.a: 1 a ,5,,.., r..era,, ¢ �4x_ ..n.,,,,. ..,,,,,,,.Y .... .�k,uo,.:,. ,1.,nr::�,.r,. •. x s c w u.,.fS:«e 'n u a., ,....,a..,tar. ar, :, ,u ,:,x,xJ,N„•,t ,.: ,]- ..�,.. 02:00 * * * * ` * 22 17 25 17 22 16 23 17 .. v "m ,H•'o r ::i. , 'v' b.. d,y. :y 4. ,. . )V'/. w;.Y ';i Y� �, : :1 ':'a N,.... ;f ,.,.�. .. i ::::, f ✓" '�7r$�tY\... x. ,,7 s ��nx+r,J. v 1 i v t a �✓l 1 ,.,1 ,,da..,I¢ 3 .,.., r, .., 5...... J r ,.. ._,,,1J:. �xa+w'w,il.7,r.MvatSc:i•1.a.avv�„irvrA,.,B.;,.y'Avt,�.r:lurxr..vV,:f,,::hu�wq`aa3:w,,:".1r,xl,.a,i:k.�wVF,a .w. ,Y Y., , 1.,".�h,1,ft.t5. k:YY„R 1.�' .: •k. � Y 8 '" 1, ice.. 04 00 • « # 2 °r +�) �: , n:xZ3 24 22 20 15 .:.:,. 22 . . . 20::. .. w . Y Y.;ri7 t, e' 91 y ..S ,At al I iq ,P"rl' •:�. 1 Jv •+f y„4 1' M. N ,. , n .:1 2'J4 w,T-, d.,f..a€" e''�i a n ..u.:'A4; .! 8 7 I K A„• i. :,3fl ,.::.. y.,,.k'W,. 1 ,.i F N. i v.x....f '7r d^crJ'''I�,''.?t".� .ve,.a. 1..:va1 Ix ..,,, ; +d,tt..: } ., ., �t,J ,� .r�'. a "'�, ., '�.,r ,,.. s. s .a,. ,:..: , �. ';::�,, : t �,r:., r :'�' :,f _ p: ) I ':;! , d . }�'y,,..' , Y t ., �, t r 15 12 1#. 21 r14 .r ,,18 8 6 '13 '. • `'14:?! 6,v�r''S<'..,FI�,.Q4.,�nAJu:,a,..n1,,.Sy ea��,:�w t,d,.,..:.u�u1U�..,�+fi.. .0�4»t._,.r:,,.:,,w,.,..r..eC X„sr,nnl'uV,..t,v,,.. ,.. us.r:,.,t...a ,.,,.,.�,. ,,,, ... ,,.Inef,.>.,I. .,.,.., _..,,N,. .d l.., ',l,Sw n,.rr r.,,,, 06:00 R 13 12 16 10 .. 8 17" . 5. 13 .. 10.: 13 s. , ..: .n .,v .r�� },:,W:- U ; ..v d.' ! ,4,,: ,.t » J.' i # ,':4+ ..' Sa.-::. ':' J � :::li• t ' 8. �.s.„t E ,...: ...J l f. ..,. , ,.. -�, ::f G .r5 ,1p L• .eiA.Q7n...: r.�E$,a,Jas,t..Y,�,.zWh6..::.a,h;:,,Ar,.nm.n.,3,�hr�U,.aM.,,'�..,kb,,.CtP.>:h,..x.J:\Uy, .,,.h1,a.,...Dur.<Li.:..uE,L'•a.,�..r.,a.,..,,......:£t.,,, .. . :. ....,.<. .,. . ,,.:....,,.,. .,. . 08:00 • 3 3 9 „10 8 7 8 3 7.. 6 , 11.0 . r J( W 'Y 1. Y'.. s.. 'N' qY YI + .tiN^,.;,1 \.,'„S � I to S>• d", .Y 7MM",t I., ,C:. s� # d' r. F ..F.. f 4 ",u � /a rr ,r i•;�' K:;: f �.; N '..1:: , ' "P r ¢. MR. '+7. .y x"v.,tdJ2 t.. 4 .p i;., r tz,., +.,,./t :.{ 7-1 t �'- .e .,f,,..l ,.v.. r....ry,:, R ....1 t15'Y A. :a 1 f:. �,■v���}n� ,,r. Nab > . k �' u r �', 5 r 4: .,, 0 1 .� .«•4TL�.urp, wwK.k,NPa;4r4v{,e:G,4'N'�`�M�..,.o� u.keu.E+:4,.:.oJ\u'u'a4.a, ead.7vlae,i,v,x1 wt.$,j�v.ox +�Im6v t�!u, .,F.A .1�' .,,✓Y,...4a ,.0 .:a.:, Ild,,.. ,•11:;tau ,rd1�.v.fS,. ,. .,,,r,,,.v,hJs. .A,::•, ., ,., >. .,.. .. e,,: 10.00 # » # • R „0 0 0 0 4 2 4 1 2 1 yX•' a' 't: N tv, ;:4"?!`' '. .wJ'NN NINE Y YN& &ri. 7 :M u )T: s a, J 5 r rlYi`"'Sr �'».�� fi.'Y'�tiUA 4�' 2' �'S�h�a n,. t^Y. ...1, ! �.' 3 ��'. S 7 lea"'4�Y;.,,Y1 tl�,`t �.,.. �:I,. ,,�r. 1 , :<.,, s�,7. 3�.A'•i y � t f� ,• b�;A ....��r ;:R,{,:.�.,h� ary,}„�:,. .'S t.,�„ ,r,i"Y�t�i.yr vf,,,,,� m,.,hl�rt. h..,a.,a a.w .,u.: a. �i,t. .rd tJ^i.a,al?141 a .�.,1, 7 ({.. ..t,. .2 .�vfiY ,�., 7 ,t: v:Q a• Y �.1': Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 61 317 208 265 194f 214 160 262* 1 186 Day 0 0 0 123 525 459 374 448 AM 09:00 10:00 09:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 09:00 10:00 Peak Volume 34 16 25 16 25 18 26 16 PM 16:00 16:00 13:00 16:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 Peak Volume 21 19 36 23 28 23 29 20 26 20 Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 2 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code:00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 TripGeneration Count : South Windsor, CT Start 03-Nov-03 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Time E)dfing Entering E)ddng Entering E)dtlng Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Entering EAting Entering Exiting Entering E)dfing Entering 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 * * * 0 1 .,. ,. �y�,,. ..,... f� ..1 �' ., ',,, �'S/"n :f :. ls.s, ..,.,(n,: <•t, ?.,,:.. a.,�,.•' Y. :r, ,J ,., r} '1. 5.,, ♦ •.�-�„ ,.. #' ':R r'3'(�. i !r;� ,,: 1 �')a.,.i�,, �y.:.�,y.,,4 w 'f4; L 1. �, V �1:c � O al.: r. '11 a'• 1a.� M 1.,r(...t� ,:,:,..a ., �.:I ��i.. . ,f „ ,.,.F3(,., , ,..t..m,. ., +.,.., ., ,..,.. .,.n:... .......... ., .,.. .:., .. .. 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' • • • 0 0 ,.., :, .... , .,...:. :: . ...... cvw, ,. w N• ixa c Po;fei*,. :r. '.'03C ,"r N,' ti.M ,.ew,,. "iv: :, w(5k'27:t t�'a. ..• :a ;:E= n.: r. r r uYr.,+ 5.w { ,.. K�.. F'�}ant f. m: �+"�a.. :.w:nfix n 3`S�,1N �, ',�. vrt„,R9 7 ,, C r n .a� R .:;.A+i' w�.. !:,• ,,:.::t y .'::, ;..0':...,I� t.,: .�i r .eY.: s �„p.. .�d'"�,,,,: , 7.#. ::, � P /�,, Y:(, /'� � ri n•R r..E#� d..... c/ryy ,.,: ',../� ,,, ., ,t , .... t -: ! a :; �., l /� ".. >..;,t.. 04:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 * 1 1 f. ...�• '. ^enM Mlf:+ 4 , ry,"r '> .A'. Yf:t 1...,... 1, 1,.,';(9N `Y '.,:H r,f IKC'.,. !/� 06:00 0 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0.,;,,.,.,ra,l2r ,.. * ..::.,, k . .. � 2 0 nfi5., .�.:. ral`�r r•4rFv_1y a u HuSt , t t r ,n'r If+z t s'.. c 4 4 14 3 4 1 08:00 18 12 21 13 16 3 15 9 16 5 17 8 R w. R w " R # k, v • , �19.00•.. ',.,�,..r 14�::., „i.r,t,�.23,,��t ,.�, 14 A.rr� ,, `�aa >�, 25 11. �,�.. 10:00 25 fi$,. '.4,Z 7 �>j� a18 ��� � !r,� ���'•�. u:�, �,•:8 r .r, : ....,:,. � :r�, ,,.; A .,t1.: .:.. ,..'t,:� .. .,� kh',3Ui"�^I' y y(�. �N�1. 3 J.'^F � .;!'>�, 1.`. •:'y` Y r A 24= !,r>'.fy , 1� � 1� •V:+'.e�Ak..4,.dsrV::. :.d,,.,,:, Y ,� ,,... 1 .. ,tN.A 1Y .:. „.,.. 7 .r:' L ,e.., ., ... h A r s r a w + 12.00 � r A k E t PM 13 24 20 11 15 * ;t, « « ... �.. 'M :c�r 1 .e$ rAMh y":�., f g: V1'. r r '21 i t�,r . ., 1 .,. A 1y 22 16', .c�r.u15 r„ t.C•!4";,, K 02:00 7 21 13 10 11 19 „y „�<28 ' * • ' 14 ` .. .., ,,, r• a i`1. N.,. J;. ,L,r,..0 ,�:,5..: , 4ei,,:. ,x .n o-> '.v; ,:: f ,, : 1 r• ., , .�, 04:00 19 13 17 20 17 15 14 ` " * " 20 15 .,..,yva ,•+f,4 Y, .N4.,, r ttht t 'Nyro.:,dd. H1 rlJ ,f fiT fr.�r �s.. RN e1 a. " n c sr �� c.n.19 �' ,�", �. "18. : �� 16 16 1.1 Q ���-`�.`.'.A>.4;w<,✓1�?�1!:y..w'�,��+...,J�f.N;n,M.7-�:�.�, fx�ffi,.�:.4Suz.,:,,..�a a�F;A',.J„s,.n„ a � s ,.,,.,. .m,,,,.:s„ >, f n f .. ,.3': ... « ,,, .., f:ui ,..: ,....,r :,r .,, ,. .,a.., 06:00 11 8 6 7 11 6 12 12 ` ..e ',.., .,. .. ,. p,,,, nY v C�a,tN.,. ,...�?:. vr.,, V 1,:' �' l�F N. .,@� .h'k \ ,.;.t .. ,l Ya .';', vf', z.Jra ,.(:,.rx �.. .. 4 d. ,ya«silo k , ,#� , ,w,,.,,q i a :;r M :.9, fi. , ,R f • �^� 10 8 r. m., t,ld 14t; l) J 1 ,. 2,<.. ,r:, s v` ,, , J:' .. a y ... ,�,,:,.. �#.>� *�. *},a.-,. , A:' 8 :.,. , ...:.. ,.. ,. ! �, ,,,:.:, ( 10.:�� tr Vl'�1V±.a+1 q �1",..,.N�' ':�"(,�,��L;,'!.�.Y.�4"�x,�,uA,«'aVW;t;,A��i,Mxt�„k•A�tlha.J 7; +o> (w):Y..x:,,,�e ,u,..p....�:1Vh,,.....::,7:,.�,sk n.,,.5 w.,e,a,:,.,.`Y..,. a e„?5 . .,..,,., .r `q1. A,,..nt w,.� .},,...,,..,r. .;%::,.,.,,x ............. 08:00 1 4 5 5 10 9 9 7 ' ' * • .,.., a:.!' w. rr Y� �}e :,:➢ , �+:, . � 6 6 ,5 �, p:, ,tr r SA, . . , ,. , � i 7 ' 7.YY'W..WN'w.iA?nfp��r::a�;'�,G'::�.k"1r 'a:",te�,W..RSA'�vlbv�W1�.�':;1�.�,M:vG,'!eW','bnw,e,m�•":k✓a Y,.:,dt4V�w. ,GG c/oLo-�!,St1,, ':�„�ai.1',e'U `•�,ul,i';S.>e l.,.,,,IW, „ :,,J ,� f., ,,.F uti:k;,.0 F.A.NJG,. ,1.:e,. l.,.0 ..,1:A., a., ,.�, ....v4., ,...,. „ ...,.. � 10:00 2 0 0 2 3 2 3 1 • ' 2 1 ' e, n;V P. Y 'N` fn 'ti i.(f.1 W9' S84'2 ,9,u. '}',5. r '..RY.i 1 d•:5 r,. 1" a I ; `ltvr 4 =v: G: .'.V". .,Z � /�, y ;*� wG t}" r6+� . Pow alWL;i?W'�tt,!,w.1L� :4J ll,.,'+9"ibif:�,.,L,.�+E�..,,_.A.Y:}a;.,:l. Lane 245 177 272 189 254 180 244 171 107 50 0 0 0 0 252 176 Day 422 461 434 415 157 0 0 428 AM Peak 09:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 Volume 32 18 32 17 26 19 29 11 29 18 28 17 PM 12:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 14:00 Peak Volume 28 21 27 21 21 23 22 26 24 18 Comb. 422 461 434 538 682 459 374 876 Total ADT Not Calculated Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 1 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 30-0ct-03 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 12 30 01:00 Q115. 01:30 02:00 ,- 02:30 ` 02 45 _ .. ._.. 03:00 037 MN 03 30 ` 4 5 >> 0345 > . ..<' ,._.._ ._ ._. ._. .__ -: 13 04:00 ' 1 U ' 6 04 30 ' S * 2 * 06:00 4 1 4 MOM(MOMMMEW 06 00 4 ` 0615A 06 30 ` 0 12 Q 25�. 07 00 ' 0 ` OR M IA AIR 07:30 2 �. 2 '- 08 00 ' 0 _ 08 30 ' 2 1 r x>v gK 09 00 0 - 0 {J�r� .-.:..�-,•.�,�-..a.-.....a _zY.c: s ''a"s-m^ ze.. ..._.,•...< ...�«-..�. .-�,.z ... c., � �+_....< {/ ...... <a Y,*.a..._.-.v_..i:....�..,.. .._�.....u-w�: �_ -,_<._. _ 09 30 ' 2 10 00 0 0 > .{/�,( ry 3r34 -:£s sx-f'• 3 *% _ r -� .' s.-y, --� .x-.fc - 1030 ` 0 ` 0 MM 1100 0 ' 1 n t .t �.,��.r'^� `�.R:'�G "+�. � �^ �` �- .�.*>. �•- -. >�'!._�-� :� �ems- � ._.-� -: 3 -rY t. �F>1;�.a��z_� ��-z�m'_fl .��...-.��e.?,.''".�'"x� .;v.:.'��,u��:r'+,3r.>,�.�,.s-;�.�� �Y�ww.>.cs.,�:•F,�t...,?.:�,T�'�� _saz<� :> .�.ss.:� ..__�.�.�. 3:�--�' �?..�_ ,. .., ., 11 30 0 _ 0 Total 0 79 0 76 0 155 Percent 0.0°/0 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 2 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 31-0ct-03 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 9 1 1 12:30 0 10 0 5 0100 0_ 15 0 4 01:30 0 5 0 4 ', ., _. 0 _�_,._ .-� _ _ 02 00 0 10 0 5 02 30 0 2 0 2 03 00 0 1 0 6 r .._..._w. 0_ 03:30 0 4 0 5 03;45'a._r».w :_ .� _._..�. . p_ _». � `_ ... •4- __.-__ _.� :� _'fig . = 0_ 04 00 0 8 0 4 04 30 0 7 _ 05:00 0 4 0 8 3 05 30 0 1 0 6 05 45 „t! 06:00 0 9 0 1 4 06:30 0 0 0 2 07 00 0 0 0 1 07 I6. >>� _.___�ri 2'r._> u S _,' .. _ 1 _'0 t._s_: 6, .m y. .... R. 2 1 074b. sMUM4' 0EMIR `l3 ...8. .. 2y _... 0 v -*Row 08 00 9 0 - M 1 08 30 6 8 6 3 09 00 17 2 2 2 __ 09 45 a ss >-h�5 x :_ 09 30 9 0 3 1 10 00 12 0 4015 _ .. . .s.:. 10 30 11 0 4 0 10.d5 � � ��`, � 47 11 00 10 0 :. s•Ar ..ems - _ r�- F �� x 1 11 30 6 0 , 1 8 _ Total 128 189 56 152 184 341 Percent 40.4% 59.6% 26.9% 73.1% 35.0% 65.0% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 3 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-8704279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 01-Nov-0 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 4 0 3 12 t5 _ 12:30 0 5 0 4 01:00 0 4 0 3 0115 ,w :: .._:. _. . ._,._Q .8 Q 01:30 0 6 0 7 V, 02:00 0 10 0 5 02:30 0 2 0 2 _,_,_.. Q .. 5 __: . Q: 17 42 63:00 0 5 0 4 r.... _.._._,_. 03:30 _.. 0 12 0 2 03d5 - _ . . _b.'_ _ ._... ._ 28 ._ U r5 ram: /^0�4j`:0_0 }0 5 0 _-5 04:30 0 5 0 r 5 Od 45 M. 4 0 ?2 iJ 46 05:00 0 7 0 6 _ , 05:30 2 1 0 3 s1 18 3 32= gar 06:00 0 2 0 5 065 06:30 0 2 0v. _ :.5` w _.E 3MM 6 07:00 _ 2 0 0 2 07:30 2 5, 0 0 AMRD745 x � t I 1 18 ' ..VF 7 RMOMMM MI- ?Mr .., a ?2 4 4M 08:00 0 3 0 0 08:30 .tea . .._ 2 0. . . 0 2 :K _ ,. 09:00 T6 2 3 2 09:30 4 2 4 µ 0 10:00 2. 0 3 1 10:30 6_ 4. 11:00 6 2 5 0 -- C.*� -,xA s.Mix }�>..� :. _ �! 11:30 2 0 4_ 1 zu. Total 100 165 51 143 151 308 Percent 37.7% 62.3% 26.3% 73.7% 32.9% 67.1% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 4 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 02-Nov-0 EAting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sun Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 7 0 0 12:30 2 11 1 3 01:00 0 8 0 6 45;; 01:30 0 0 0.. . . . 0145 p` 7 Q:3E_MM JIF _< .._ 9 _,. - , 20 02:00 2 1 _ 0 0 w 02:30 0_. 9 0.... 10 , 38, 03:00 0 4 0 6 03:30 . 0,,. 2 0._ 5 _ 04:00 0 2 0 4 04:30 0 3 0 6 UR 35 05:00 0 2 0 1 05:30 0 0 0 1 21 r 0 : 14 z z = KJ _ 06:30 0 0 3 =. 1 40 � Q 3' k t3y 4 l8 07:00� __x0 5 4 _0_ ..3 07 00 S 0 _ 3 - F _.:r>_.. �..-..a'rzs..3'? .a:,.rt.e-.,ra}'t'iu_z{`- _ri _u_-<a-d r..+s..,.. �._.. ..e+, .y . €.r-.». .l':.,s._. .. .«u..dc-.. ., t f.uY-,:_._ .n:x-':.`-+t_s., •d.J�. __ r . 't0f�7r:30 a0f 1 0 1 ..:;:. 08:00 5 4 2 1 08:30 0 3' 0 y 0 ,.. 09:00 7 0y 1 0 :. �:is tj-r'14a�, -k -F. .`1 f. ?.., ,r•z��' `d'S_ s Z 5.'- � - r� - _..r_ zs 09:30 1 0 �.. 10:00 5 0 7 0 ':'.r 1.o k�-: �.�'�3Gfv-'n%Y''�'':� 7. -� -.:;- � -- -•� r�'�""„h :s"' �w£3- T�`-3"` -'� '� <�-emu---w �'�3�?''_ y.�� 'fir,"� 10:30 12 0 2 0 a... . - r. 11:00 0 0 .Y 0 0 ...k..,� s ' v:a....T#5 :t.. -r ,a yt �2.. 11:30 4 -.-. 0 Total 79 135 42 118 121 253 Percent 36.9% 63.1% 26.2% 73.8% 32.4% 67.6% Traffic Data Solutions LLC Page 5 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT start 03-Nov-0 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 7 0 5 12:30 0 4 0 3 01:00 0 0 0 1 01:30 0 4 _ 0 7 0145_' x ., ,._._ ...__. .� _ .. 6..3;_ 02:00 0 0 0 6 02:30 0 3 0 5 Du' 7 28_ 03:00 0 5 0 3 03:30 0 3 0 6 04:00 0< 1 0 2 04:30 1. 2 0W MMOMMO __ 5 . - 4 _rt. _`. 1,9 y " _ l ._. ...,fi. _. 3 _ 2.. : 32 _. ._ 05:00 0 2 0 9 _._'L 05:30 1 3 y 2 5, 36: n06c:00 0 4 0 0 _ . W 15 35..3> -,.-_..._t_..-�,,. - _:'..,_. xx u. .:;<. .�..'�l. .. :-_.x}:'✓... >a-_t _:c .�II ...a .,.a...�..�., �:-�.,.._.:� .r`....x <.. 06:30 0 5 0 2 07:00 0 7 0 n 5 >1 07:30 4 0 1 1 pY Y s 0 U _ 08:00 6 0 2 0 ': ........-.' _-".Wiz.. �- ..w._>......_ .,.n._. �.L.., r._.�•..<....._„.-...... ..._..-� _ ......,,:a.,.... __.-_.�_ ,..�.c .vx ... �.. . ,.. _.,.0.., ...._ ,_. ,. 08:30 6 1 6 0 08 45 F G. , r t8 'NE � ,, 09:00 6 0 1 0 09}� C ;15 >yr+�' .v. .?z w:a:..-x.mow..�. >v.S.Sr..�s;�_'.x-X ?_:s�Yv.G...xr ....�..--.__+,... .: .v 5•z ,.-^c- ......._..<:L�. `F G- o-...... C_.'z.=..-u-s _rs<:-C^�t....✓. .-. 09:30 15 0 3 0 . m 10:00 4 0 3 0 10:30 5 2 3 0 .,-. '�cx^2r7..... �`yt�'i'.H a..�,,'�_....,a...r�,...��- -r,'}>�r :..:��.,...-urs'�, s.,✓...e:,�«.,_,.._ rr,.._.:-� �.,,:?a:.. ....,.,_1.,�... ?- -. �,-. ..., .- .-- 11:00 5 0 4 0 ..... 11�5;��� }�4__.���:�..,�1�8�� ..��� b,p�es�s'a�_.,�.. '�.:`_..... �. ,r_s�a�-•4,��,,. s.Z_.,_ II `"..r�.�« _.�,._`as�-+�.-�r•�, r'.a..,.��e�;.� .... .._. ... <:�, �145.� .�y � _�_�:: _�,�.�`•�;:�,���>4 �-.�''?5: �� ��0 �'� ` 4:� ' II �>�_;:. ��`16._� .����:0 '��"���41 _.: ._0 Total 119 126 ^65 112 184 238 Peroent 48.6% 51.4°A 36.7% 63.3% 43.6% 56.4% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 6 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 04-Nov-0 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12 00 0. 6 0 6 REM 1230 0 8 r 0 3 ,.. 1,245n 0100 0 3 x 0 9 01.30 0 1 46 02:00 0 5 0 2 02:30 0 5 _,.0 2 03 00 0 4 0 7 _.---- . ,_ .. .. 03 30 0 1 04:00 0 9 0 5 7 _ 04 30 0 7 0 2 _ 44!►`•n- 5 1;: � 27 k, _ ..,0 3 s_ _ ._... .� ,.._.:,_ .s....a _.... �__ .,_�.., 05 00 2 2 _ 0515; y 0 ,. _ .:,.t..3_ _... _,s . x 05 30 1 4 0 4 0545: 0 ' ,.; .__ 3 _ ...y 11, 1 , 1 _,.r 2.._ . .=20 06 00 2 0 t16,15 1 R,.., 06 30 0 0 0 3 x �N Y R 3 13 _ 07 00 0 0 3 NIM _n.'az__..s, v....�'`a�` �za..�o......,<._ �..«r.X�I>„z�_e. .�-.. t-<-F_r.<t.-,.c'.:�.r .::�_•.a .. � 07 30 5 4 1 0 } 08 00 5 4 2f 2 .,..<..:•:x: _..,"_c:k v..sr..-�.a-r.3 x ..>._.��n-. '� .v c�n ._... .-..u, 08 30 5 0 2 1 09 00 6 0 5 0 _ r n915�.,�-�_� __ tip ��z-�,��w��._��-::��0: -:.,���'�-,;��•:.�::. _���, .�.�...�:�<_�v��4`_ �H..�.�����,.�.r.,u.,:z. �:�a..M_�-�-_,.;x_.. _.. .. n 09 30 4 4 5� 1000 10 0 4 0 w 1- "a- -ax 1030 r 6 0 j � 7 0 � �v F p 2? 11 00 12 2 � 5 5 �+ 1130 7 0 2 _ 00 `z&"xT' $ `• „z� ,�xf3• < `:., :$ - .��f i''+ 1�Y.i,'r. - 3 :.L Total -. .. 128 144 _. ._ 63 126 191 270 Percent 47.1% 52.9% 33.3% 66.7% 41.4% 58.6% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 7 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 05-Nov-0 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 8 0 5 12.30 0 4 0 2 01:00 0 2 0 9 0130 0 9 0 4 01453 _t::: 02:00 0 4 0 2 02:30 0 2 0 3 AN 03 00 0 2 0 5 011 0 5 03 30 0 0 0 8 04:00 0 5 0 3 04 30_ 0 6 0 6 04 45" D: t' 0, _..`. 0 : 5 . . _ ... wtT 37 } _ s._ ._.. ,..__. _ .... . 05:00 0 4 0 7 0 - 05 30 2 1 4 0 3 Z _ ., 06:30 0 1 0 2 07 00 2 2 0 - 1_ k 5• 32 A 07 30 5 0 07 45. r r2 9 s tb st4 �3w, 3 _a . ...Fr>.,_ ..�- 08 00 5 0 1 N".a A . ... s ?"`7 08 30 5 4 09 00 4 2 y Mau f 3 _T,. _. ,. _._ _:. ..�.,. ;,x�.>�_-,�..n.� �"S'..... ��_-s..��-�..- -��S_::".� �.,-§[_".,}..xi :...r__.,,,... ..=:ts�r.d-..��-r..,r �'�`: .z..�_.5".�, -.r`.a 3.,�.._�n..-_:,s� .-;?,....�.r.wr 09 30 5 3 0 0 Oil 10 00 3 0 Yx-t.. ,Y;3,..$.�r�.ew. 1030 8 0 4 0 .SS S .f 4,.4>.£ ,`�.' �5 ,-� � r-i ->��- s:'.W. s._. .._�-�,........-a,.i _,... ..iz v 11 00 6 2 4 0 _ �t 1.15� - _ sF.�_. sW _[.,.xt� ..,. w�,:-,'4 11 3,0 _ t5 0 _ 5 0 G 1s! ;_r•"". .k �''_y_-_fi ...'3�F `:t. ._ _or@ �._'h Total 108 146 54 125 162 272 Percent 42.5% 57.5% 30.0% 70.0% 37.3% 62.7% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 8 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code:00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 06-Nov-0 6dting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 1200 0 8 0 3 _ 1 12 30_ 0 6 0 0 1245' __N. ._s .. __ 01:60 0 3 0 2 r._ . _ 0130 0 6 0 2 16 02:00 0 7 0 5 0 " 8 02 30 0 4 0 4 w ..0 19 D : , .,_..x$ _. _0 K. _ . 26 .z. . Q ._ 45 � . 03 00 0 7 0 03 30' 0 0 0 1 0 . 4 _• v . .04 00 0 7 0 4 04 30 0 1 0 3 .iz.._.` 05 00 0 1 _. ._ ._. f_.._.. 05 30 2 6 2 0 0�6+00 0 6 W Ar 06 30 0 1 0 3 ..J- 07 00 0 4 -01 ru ry X O. 3A w- 07:30 6 4 47 £St* ^il.i:'S ec3•-- «...e..4:_ .. s�:��'iY 14 }�1Q �E..Y1 •kvo .I. T.C.S..?1 ....._.,.._ X�,:S1 _...xz c., -..r..v._.._.5.v -fi �5 1 8 08 00 3 4 0 On 08 30 3 2 f¢ a 4 1 08 45,• h� � 8- � � �5 -���� �, 1 k �u� � � _.. �.: _._,:.. _,c,.. _a.F.-24 0^R9 00_� 3y 0 r 2 2 _#S:,*:r_ .e`.C:.=. ._,s:�.`.''.r;�'. x:,r._z '.` :,;,z;�. � �m .'�sMM�i.�" `; 09 30 8 0 2 1 10 00 8 1 3 1 . Vr . 10 30 13 0 5 0 A 11: -. 00 � ��T 11 t��5�':.�4�`�'�.s� „�'3.t �`"F' '��3�...�_ � # �� ��".,` '�_� a � .S"��''r'•�`k�- --�s� r�� sr���.,�� _.:_a-_3h�sE<... .�.t a�a.>�-��'-�' .-fi»_,.cs.Y.-y..._�t....��r'-<4�sr,� _.:• l..z�?�5���..... ._�...:Ra�_3 3�,Kx �:,;<� .� .-.3.s✓,._'.,r s .cs; ._«-��.._.�o-_ 11 30 5 1 2 r E 0 £>� a � r 11.45-- � :. ..._,O =:._. Total 103 141 44 127 147 268 Percent 42.2% 57.8% 25.7% 74.3% 35.4% 64.6% Traffic Data Solutions, LLC Page 9 14 Dow Street adulthousingtripgen Vernon, CT 06066 Site Code: 00000000000000004769 Watson Farms Drive (860)-870-4279 Trip Generation Count South Windsor, CT Start 07-Nov-0 Exiting Hour Totals Entering Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 ' _ 0 ' 121-5 .. Q a k 01:00 0 1 f 0130 0 0 ' 02:00 0 " 0 ' 02:30 0 " 0 03:00 0 0 03 30 0 ' 0 t 04:00 0 * 0 04:30 0 ' 0 05:00 0 0 ' R JINNE5 06:00 0 0 ' 06:30 0 :.0 Ra 07 00 0 ' 0 30 fi f '� 07�t5�'d,..__...-Y,£.a..._ :...r. .i`-_,. m ..'v-_•_._ _ ..-.6 _ Y+.....�r.r....P �3 .-�..,a?S.'� -ti_... a..i_. _.3','�'.... .az.xis --�....,_.:3 .�...� ... ._... _,_ .....,._<..: 07:30 2 1 ' g-> 08 00 0 ' 0 Z'NotKt� 08 30 4 2 ' ,""TA, 09 00 n1 09 30 2 094$ 12 0 20 '0 -�._� 1000 8 ' 3 _ :$ 1.0.1 .''-rt sa :"'..3 -.. f - -._ s�.s ss - r .MwfMt,�-s5;;'S.„ :a'_ ...e: ,...x'.--a....vn--�....sAMIS x .._ �.xY'a�;�,'iracd-�i, �15.,v_. 1030 5 * 9 " ty0 * f mot} _ 47 `;; ;c..._.:r"__ _* ,�a_''.�rz. _ �..-`-�.e..:�c:a� ..,a. :.:.-�.. r 11 00 8 " . M T: c-MM s .•� a,,.-v'' .,_. :� ....,.,_.x.. ., -;k= 1130 4 4 ' Total 107 0 50 0 124 { 0 Percent 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Grand - 872 1125 425 980 1264 2105 Total Percent 43.7% 56.3% 30.2% 69.8% 37.No 62.5% ADT Not Calculated 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) * Weekday AM Peak Hour #ane -lore I WIR wo a III E..v, . .BED,.._ . B _ �_.,RR_.4; BL Lane Configurations 4 Deal F•oi .v t 1_900 •t900 _ _ OQ 1900 �t900 1900kY 190 900 9Q0 1900 `190Q. 9U Lane Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 _ 13 13 - Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 p0 0 Storage Lanes Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 adi g©ete. ft343 -33 - 35� �3 0R� 28 28 28 28 Trailing Detector(ft) 161 161 177 177 -6 -6 -6 -6 MET 15 .E Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Frt 0.996 0.923 0.928 It Pro� ec-tec A998 0 98 Q:983 _ U980 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1990 0 0 1992 0 0 1437 0 0 1751 0 t fPermtff ;9 . 0 80 u 8.7 3 k Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1948 0 0 1956 0 0 1279 0 0 1525 0 R�ghtTu'rnR7ecf. es;-W: � Satd. Flow(RTOR) 3 49 86 )=1ea wad ac or - 5 0.85 r 0 n � 0.84 84 Q: Y�= _ 9 &tt U9� Q 96 Link Speed (mph) 30 40 30 30 Travel Time(s) 14.2 10.9 6.7 26.9 ol.urge�vPh - 96 0 26 83:: Confl Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 G[ �_TF' BC _ o •_ 0 a,.. 0 0�OQ a 0�7�..�� �, Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%a 8% 12% 12% 12% 2% 2% 2% u Beoc.ca es( • _71 0 - :0 0 0 0 4 :U3 Parking (#/hr) oc SIM Adj. Flow(vph) 13 352 0 24 575 18 30 7 49 80 12 106 ane Grou OWN ` ., 65 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ,atece ases � Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 petecfo . .rasesI ft.Ilm- Minimum Initial (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 irt�irtu , :S :li x s2f? 5-ff. a.a ==0 V'� 0 Total Split(s) 44.0 44.0 0.0 44.0 44.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 r 7 Maximum Green (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 22.0 22.0 r 22.0 22.0 . All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 'eadaL`ag. Eff ..- Lead-Lag Optimize? ehic�e Ex ensi" s 3-Q- ;Q 3. s3 Q Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 s - • - �r 1 1 &W/ # R� • ' -• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 MWE •-•- _ 1 1 1 1 A ': - • # �, § h -= x., �+•1 3 -� • �:�; ;���::..,,a ,�, �` '�K��a �.§ `� }, �tgf'L • 3 � rt'4 • 11IMMUT00,49W. �.�r -.X. .t<£ 3 c - • 1 • s .s � 1 :° � _ �.'r�.ws»�3-fib _a tt t �-y BF'z-3 i`z � ,$ -! - - • � r{� y1-- - I; ,R`Ll� y_w-3r�A./}4�3. � a�._G, �+ 4 - • • �• { 1+11•�il-1•� �•t•�•11®Ci�� .:i' z 4.�x.._:tr 'r?!'�.`.k;�.a,� ..-.-K.�z,�.aa��;. �.. ,. E.._ -.,.. 1..�.;f�u�`.t> r ��� ��. �,r: 7 • 1e • • • - 11 • • -• • • •• • 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) * Weekday AM Peak Hour ovemert E MWEBW. ,W 010 9 Mg NO WE MRB OW � B Lane Configurations 4� Ideal Flow" A �00 __[900 -1900 t900 19Q09 1900,_ 19Q0. 1.9001900 I900: Lane Width 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Grade °n" s °a '° Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 bane tiU Factor _ 00 � - Frt 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.93 It Prt�tecte d��� nrt Satd. Flow(prot) 1990 1992 1436 1750 f P�ecmitt ,.: -b0 98 0 98 '$• 08 a0:8. Satd Flow(perm) 1951 1958 1234 1555 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj�Efovrr. pFt 13 352 0, 24 57 8an -gip Q ,$0 U Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 365 0 0 617 0 0 86 0 0 198 0 Hdav)t U@h'T i S";(°fo. '$%o" o 0 0. o ; r. ° 12°0 - ° ° o :z "CQ. ,810 $fo,. 8/o . .o. 12/c,. _.x12.o._._n. 2/o . �32 0;_ Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm xafected BIa' Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 ctua a Green aG"; yn1 e Effective Green,g (s) � 32.6 32.6 8.2V 8.2 ctuateq'7GRaf o _ m, Q 6 0:65: 0: 6 T Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane GrpCa (vph) P 1277 1282 203~ 256 '�:'�-� v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 c0.32 0.07 c0A3 vt sa:2s s 0 2 a. zEW Uniform Delay,d1 3.7 4.3 18.7 19.9 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.5 12.4 Dew Level of Service A A B C Approach LOS A A B C HCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service A F:>F Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.8 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 rttersectrofttrzatronR ° t_G eve[o _erarrce G .b.', c Critical Lane Group G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday AM Peak Hour BESUM Lane Configurations + Ideal Flow_ vphTM1900 0 1900190Q 9 001900t9001.9.0_U [900 1900 19Q0 _90 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 350 185 0 330 _;� r Storage Length (ft) 275 0 260 0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 4.8 4.8 3.5 4.8 4.8 Lead ng De,ecfo y�t; ' - 8 90 8; 30 - 50J - 0 Trailing Detector(ft) -6 282 -6 292 0 -10 -10 -10 10 Turning S ee k m t a.1. 9 55 U15•M 9 , Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Pid-6i a Frt 0.956 0.850 0.993 0.994 Flt P 6tecte i 0 950' _ 0.950: 4:950- 0 950 ` Satd. Flow(prot) 1656 3166 0 1703 1792 1524 1704 3384 0 1718 3416 0 Satd. Flow(perm) 458 3166 0 1049 1792 1524 235 3384 0 760 3416 0 Satd. Flow(RTOR) 229 7 6 Nead or" Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40 40 Lank Disfa ce3 ft - ¢ , = QQ .526' _ . 9 3 r�. � Travel Time(s) 4.5 9.0 41.2 10.1 col me`v • 3, 9TEMT.' 58 10 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) C ontB' es r: Peak Hour Factor _ 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 ° °ro 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 60 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% Bus Bloc age„ ;;h��zY _ �` Q � 0 0 �0. •0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid Block�Tra �c;°fob` °a • -'` �� � u�,..,. -° Adj. Flow(vph) 120 171 71 86 365 229 50 401 19 184 1234 51 Lane Gro�i `�• o 'u� -, � 2 2 86 � - 6 � Q- 2 0 _v_�2�� Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 8 Defector P a e x4 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 ,-mimur Sp-i s 8 �= ' �� ors- ,8 5 _ 5 5 Total Split(s) 8.5 25.0 0.0 8.5 25.0 25.0 8.5 34.1 0.0 12.4 38.0 0.0 �OxS(If_°a �) ;..__ Maximum Green (s) 5.0 20.2 5.0 20.2 20.2 5.0 28.4 8.9 32.3 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.8 0.5 1.8 .ea/La ea" ag= MEEK �- Lead-Lag Optimize? -- Minimum Gap(s) 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 4 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday AM Peak Hour RF B.We _ r y T�me.l3efore Reduces 0.0=R 0� 0 :0': ? - 00 00 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 half Mode' ,g None• ��„� y ;ss None ,, _ ire Noses None_: ooe a e Walk Time(s) �- Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) ,�,•�..�-, =- ,. .,, � � -•tea; n �1 �7R �.. � �05. .,. Queue.t.ength•550th ft� ��r ��, 55 #2..,� .. Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 77 � 73 44 25 107 74 #385 n ema �n 3C}4st:.ft. 201 _ Is 50th Up Block Time(%) 95th UU _:BI c Time. °o ; ems, ti Turn Bay Length(ft) 275 260 350 185 330 95th Bay Block Time% 9% 13% IQueu ni g Pe af,� �: r f ?P,rea �e* Offie Cycle Length:80 Ac ua ec'�_Cvc e Len th 6 2 Natural Cycle:80 Hit �o�,�n` Typ�cuated Oco r ma _ # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer. WWI�>QueIe s MIS 'axirtiu ftefwa c c es Splits and Phases: 9:Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. + } 01 o2 o3 l 04 05 06 o7 08 a G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5PRe9 5 Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday AM Peak Hour B. 13 0,1 13R _. .._,BR SBL. Lane Configurations Ed Flow v i T �'1'900 -1900�;1 000 900 '904 '~�90071 9Q0��1:900 �900 1.-0- t.-- 90Q Grade(%) _0% 0%� 2% 2% Tot�t.osftime, s _Y 5k �3. 5} 3 9 �3.9�� 35� �� 8���z � �'3 5, x48. �tW, Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00-- Frt � t 00 0 96,E 1 00 ; 1 QO` 0 85 � fJOO'"99 1 00 Wit}99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.951.00 0.95 1.00 ;16563r 67Q3;-'1792 '152417.04 3: Satd :Flow rot)= '� Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.42 1.00 Volume(vph) 103 147 61 74 314 197 43 345 16 158 1061 44 Adj. Flow(vph) 120 171 71 86 365 229 50 401 19 184 1234 51 Cane Grou:Flow v h O' 242 �0 7T 8 365, 22950 . 420 0 y (84 t2�8"' Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% Tura T pe x _ x m+ t 4 Prnf t P�err% yam+pf UR pm+pt a ' Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 er . i ed P aces s 6 v 4 �,8 t Z!ONE ,. . 2 F � Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 18.7 22.4 18.7 18.7 26.8 24.2 33.6 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.41 0.36 0.51 0.41 Clea an a Time Vehicle Extension (s) 1 5 5.0 1.5 5 0 5.0 1.5 2 0 1 5 2.0 LanezGrp Cals `237.` 426 s6fi t2124,7.2138g`� v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.01 0.12 c0.03 c0.38 Ratio Perm .� n rya � 5�0 � 417 , v/c Ratio 0.51 0.27 0.22 0.73 0.54 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.93 llrnfo' 'iea��_ 11�9 7 "� 22 8 141 _6-.. 8.5; 9 8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay(s) 17.8 20.0 16.3 29.3 23.8 15.0 16.6 9.8 30.2 Approach Delay(s) 19.3 25.8 16.4 27.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 ctua ed I✓ ca49h{s _umtolost tune s K4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.7% ICU Level of Service C c G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday AM Peak Hour '07* ane•GEa �. � Lane Configurations deaf'_tow v � 19004 1 OQ , 1900 190Q: 00 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lar►e Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 ante Uti -actor; a 0- 00 00_ 1:0Oi:00,�14, IM Qk�, s F Ped Bike Factor Fit Protected _ 83- 0=--:1863 . ._. Flt Permitted Sates:; a -' f831 0 Q,. 863` � `. z Headway Factor 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In Sp�`ee� n, r 3 n , � 30 Link Distance(ft) 1496 625 424 Volume(vph) 300 4 0 597 0 13 onfl � Sty �, 'r h1°= 23 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) �ea�x ��u� 9"UO, T ��ate -^ �iL3ETlf i7GS�.:V.lGIB.€EY Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0 Mo 2°o °o' fM?0 a Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ar. ing Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 14di�l=to' yp R ---- — - 0-__ 6�9-� 0' Lane Group Flow(vph) 330 0 0 649 0 14 part Con_ oFree._ Free 5tp ' Control Type: Unsignalized G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 7 FUSSONMANC-FF51 14: Oakland Rd. & North Site Drive Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday AM Peak Hour "X ; A-% *.,, I e Moverrte7R�11 �=JIW29-RJ9s.. �.. .,. Lane Configurations "+ + Sign Cotfr'o '_ 1 ` T Grade 3% 0% 0% Vo Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 Hour y_ o ate. ve 26 4 1 >0: '649° Pedestrians Lane W' t ft tiAil Walking Speed (ft/s) Perms tBlo� age a' - - � F:x�n Y, Right turn flare (veh) IVledian e tr ooi a 011 x Median storage veh) )psfrey arrt o►Qna 'ft" h 625 _ y pX, platoon unblocked iC onflici , 3307, _ vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 330 977 328 tC,2 stage(s) 5t3 p0 queue free% 100 100 98 nx �M capac �, e Volu�meooya 33 64 . 14 ,kil _= Volume Left 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 713 ; o unteta Capac {3 0. 802 - Queue Length (ft) 0 0 2 ontrol' e as Lane LOS B _.: Ap�roac aye �U .0 0.24 b . Approach LOS B W ens t Average Delay 0.1 Ca a cfiffzain- ®.�A�37, 5�o N ,._a_f�J'Lexe G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined AM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 8 -- FUSSONMANC-FF51 • --h`: f-`�'�� '�.:;Y �...�- _ -_ � . �[:i 7. '�:a �t �a xa xt., !�L.;F.'S'� C.Y'• _ �2t- s,-�� WRNP • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ir 1 1 of 'k.r-K..`" ,`•.£ r • --' ```a��,.,` � .,+ s` "' -t ':,ui� � '.0 -'g "z Y.'��F.�. �"` .W. r rya-• ! ,,t �" e4_c,. 111, OR-00' < Wta a..Sm +vim 4p "'� • �•- `. tv ._xzt. • .�"'-, .. ��..:Y, � t-S.e.-#-.. ss �.n...::sR, -- ,..: -• • .•- - - - `ems - ctt -' :. • T �., ,� .+.- m 3 ` ,y SO •. _ ..+. • r rx �� / • c;s `�k� �. i.t e. s k t n�z�r 3r��� g�` � t� :r r -� `- �. � _ sy�� �. 4r '� �e k,�.n < F i'< '-'�g '� �,.a., �#15: `�,. i,�;.. s •-�Y ;a_ • 3 #, �5�,.+ • *33. • g^1"`'� �' a+;, t ..- k",;,is`s23t'xa+A-'s` �my' .` _` v,f.kt. -Xa.;` .5 pgga •1 • - - • 11 11 • • �`�"�Y'"'i F �• � � � a x s x E a-5 LY.K3'Y �3" ,:-L� ! ` 7 �'' ,�sr' a.i�-. `. • - 1 1 �• � • cam',. � $�f ��-�� / Ts�„��[� -:-+- ���� �""'`-s - - f :-n^� fYi.. __3���r --ems' ,. k _ 11 ; •1 11 a� • k •• s. 1)- 3 �a� _,'�- � 1 1 �� / 1 �'3t�a' =� ' ,'r �; n . +k:: � : �' �. - _ - • 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) + Weekday PM Peak Hour ane rOup fi B �� BEt B B l BF� L- � B Lane Configurations -�"�` �900_ 19Q0 90Q- � 900" �1900-. 1900 't900 ��1900 ��900�, ,900�w�1�900` 90Q Lane Width (ft) 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 13 13 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detecor� r 343 � �43.�. °� �350� ��►, ��_-�,`-28 � � 28•s _ - Trailing Detector(ft) 161 161 177 177 -6 -6 6 -6 �15�•'- Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00�A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.994 0.997 0.983 0.976 Flt Permitted 0.854 0.929 0.888 0.806 Satd Flow:(perm= 0_�182E mow«.• ...,�li�-��., --.��0 �._1495 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.09 1. . 6 0 96 0.96 �n Link Distance(ft) ' 561 637 229 1184 TraveTime 's . _ y12$ ". 2 ?g Volume(vph) 102 711 3 34 486 72 36 13 58 50 11 42 Pea°u aurFactor 0 .4 0 0.9 r '9 0920'722 E72 :0. 85t1r 8,5 ' 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% �dj Flo. i vph' �09� ,�7� :8�- .�0' �8; $1: _�.59� ��:3• Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 868 0 0 643 0 0 149 0 0 121 0 urn Tyke: r e e_ , e ems_ Protected Phases 2 2 4 4 z Perrn_ etPha es 2 . r 2 Detector Phases 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 o=o =0- 7 Minimum Split(s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 11.0 11.0 11 0 11.0 otaS- Tiffs: a2 b'� p- TOtal Split(%) 74% 74% 0% 74% 74% 0% 26% 26% 0% 26% 26% 0% Yellow Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All �R'�=Re e_• s 0`.x��9 yM --- � --- ��-_a . `-�- - MOsM, Lead/Lag Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.5 .o o e- one None Walk Time(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0- 8.0 Flas Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 1 L �0 0 0 0 Que e§`e 12. Queue Length 95th (ft) 311 162 52 67 trite.;a �r s _48 57 .•_: -=� �` `� ��� 50th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft) G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined PM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 1 FUSSONMANC-FF51 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday PM Peak Hour OtB�, B�Oc�c i�1e oo 95th Bay Block Time% ue � :en ve Cycle Length: 70 ctua a .. e: n 3 Natural Cycle:50 Splits and Phases: 6: Oakland Rd. &Felt Rd. m2 m4 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined PM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill,Inca Page 2 FUSSONMANC-FF51 " 6: Oakland Rd. & Felt Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday PM Peak Hour BAMATAMB 0-. B. 5 = Lane Configurations 13 Lane W idth 16 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 5.0 5.0 Totaf Lost time(s) 4.0 .r 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.93 0.95 Flt Pro ec a � � Satd. Flow(prot) 2118 2123 1600 1812 pp � �% Satd Flow(perm) 1827 1983 1387 1329 72AMMX; 6-% Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.85 0.85 A � Iow4 56 3- " 528 8 , .- 0 g 5 ME_ 6' Lane Group Flow_(vph) 0 868 0 0 643 0 0 149 0 0 121 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm , -. Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Actuate Green,':G_s _. 74= Effective Green,g (s) 47.4 47.4 7.6 7.6 01 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1353 1469 165 158 Y VISYat[O rot" v/s Ratio Perm c0.48 0.32 c0.11 0.09 OE4 x Uniform Delay,d1 4.1 3.2 27.8 27.3 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.2 42.3 17.8 45 Level of Service A A E D Approa Approach LOS A A E D HCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service B 1=C(VIt o e<fa Ca ace ra ra -•=-� `� .. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.0 Sum of lost time(s) 9.0 I,nte�se_ aork:�Capac� :-tiliza tbrt'� • 6°Io-. ''IC - =ev Hof";;ervi- _ F -_-. c Critical Lane Group G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined PM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 3 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday PM Peak Hour l .. Cycle Length: 100 Natural Cycle: 100 o tto' c u to cv . Ana -- Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. e 5- e Splits and Phases: 9: Oakland Rd. &Sullivan Rd. ,+ 01 o2 o3 Y o4 71< 05 4 06 o7 08 G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined PM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss&O'Neill, Inc. Page 5 FUSSONMANC-FF51 9: Oakland Rd. & Sullivan Rd. Berry Patch Adult Housing 2005 Combined Conditions (using Watson Farms rates) Weekday PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Ideal Flow. vphpl _ 19Q [900 1900 . '900900 1900.E 90U 190 g 19Q0 19Q0 ,. 9 90f 0% 2% 2% 5 - --- - Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Fri �1 00 7r 't.00 �00 : 4 85 t :OfJ 99=. . � � Fit Protected 0.95 1`.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.26 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.10 1.00 ;'-- Satd�Fl�ow�.` Volume (vph) 479 468 109 88 221 262 79 1153 112 270 757 2 Peak"hour,factor P,HI= ; Adj. Flow(vph) 557 544 127 102 257 305 87 1267 123 297 832 2 ane Group' low=i v=h 557 '!.6 , - .U'" 257' 305 �7 139(t 297 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 41.1 32.0 23.7 18.1 18.1 38.8 33.0 48.0 38.7 Effec'"-ive Greece QM9 0 3390 2 3 as -... Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.33 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.34 0.50 0.40 Clea ar ice 3 5 4:8L Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 5.0 1.5 5 0 5.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 aneGCa v t% 57. -f 36` 23 :_. 5 p ;293 267� 'f7 ,, ,271367 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.20 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.40 c0.13 0.24 v/c Ratio 1.22 0.59 0.43 0.74 1.04 0.33 1.18 1.10 0.61 1; ttiform�De ay.cI1 m_ 3 8 7;, i 29 7 8 0 441 18'6- 3z 8 --- 291 y 23 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lncreme" a De[a 2 6 94' OL63 64 0 9.0. $2 8 , Delay(s) 140.8 29.0 30.2 48.1 103.9 18.9 123.3 111.8 24.4 Se I6e v _I Lev-'el of `�t� C F g,_ F Approach Delay(s) 79.7 71.0 117.1 47.4 r a OS M_ Mimi FEE -`KAIIMM � .. CM• very a Corif�ot�Q'e aj � _._ 8�6� �F;Geitet of Set��vtce E ��, - HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.8% ICU Level of Service G R. Lane=Grou r- G:\P97\97146\A76\Synchro\Using Watson Farms Rates\2005 Combined PM Watson.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Fuss &O'Neill, Inc. Page 6 FUSSONMANC-FF51 io `.`Ss,x�a s $wI d�x��Ai �Y •-. e_ o s Huh`° '11 '1/ eYr •ii�� s _ .. own - v .i• , •--e • _ a 5-z 3-:'� �-.� ,�.'.-?: t ;, n ,Y, r�3 � fr�,L:..6`_'��r��M-,a �-w�3�,z - - _ • � 11 �� '11 11 11 �- 11 11 _'�-- ` __s,s 3F ,�. ,,,� `.1 °•a <_3�� s. ! {-..>� ..i �� -�1 i s r -.`-..�-N�,#�: �, ,-` .�`�.��%�'�,.�',_f� �`A".,3�Y � t• • a 'A-A � iC� �� x:d, �3e-.��� f_ �..-��`�i �+.R'_:�a.' • Er"^�^ A vra„�� ?£-,�.� �. � �`u+'w r._n y' S' T' '.• • 1 1 11 11 11 11 � Y•1 r 4 . e . • all •1°ILC • • �a- z�i l" • a -:�_� as�`-� H�s -`� �`f _T .t�� ., ,za.`t".. 'T�Iq.- �i..s`= _. � �f.i �-q. • SN - _tow"lx� •® 1 _ter, �` 3� i -_ �- . "=' `*`#�i`,s 0 �v�0/• _' �,_0 .'',z� -�.� �yF�,���.#��t`s�, - '.v�"s�,� s�;: •• • '-�-`;: • .tom �-a a .,j' '+<xk,, -Y,' -..J � ���.,. .:r'�'�.r,,. _ .rz i —%Rr-_.., - - • ..�1 <�� ��.�°: ��#' �._-.��fi '�a .�'._:vi��r=�" `-"i`aw''�C h�.=t�4.,..�.�. �� ..� s;.„s"�,. . x._ '....5-t° .ate„ ' - - : • • � 3`�`iR� �:�. �r xa�-rj��L. .s --..� ,4.`t.ytss' s.Z�,.�. !`��rYf ♦}�-rt,P-�' �``�+.��j�a�a�,- ` '- � �� '� W`.NON .k*AM-vA • - -• P�.+-�"'-'�-,.:x+y". - `�yv���t. • x r � ��g'�` _�t`'��, ' = _''': -�"•�cxiK�E „ _ Mw • � •� • 1`�i� ,��',�""���,��,.�J.�`�, � C,� -�' �Y ,rT.- �--�5 �- 'a��ez�.� �'�; �:��`� ,,'mot. a Vol -- -• •.. •;. 11 `tom, c € -} Y r ,;.�Cx.• - f�' �".vYi z f • '?'.F.,,4 -z £-. �� s-- �.� � _�nt� t. • „.5>� • r,. '4`r'��_�;�".`,� ._r�' c< �ar�: �a��`�� '''-- �`Y ..r • •1 • - 11 11 _�•. �•� 3�tih4:'SRi7q �.,� � �a-�`�'��'^�5.r,s Y,��f�S..� f �' ����a�.'a+!ar "-�i l t•.:1' .`t= � ��C � 11 11 • - • 1 1 • e 8 .:��.�g�'a� � 9 1 1 1 ,jj • 1 '- x - � a s..= -P�,�Y ri,�__ a � � �.'sa*�'- ,.ate _ - • }y�yp . •e ... i- a'��4r. '10 11i -� s1 F r ,r,:_x„4 .: i�`�� '? .�,' _ � � '.`�' _ 4. 16.. i • Am 0.. ®��V.. 'p{��H� l.�i • 1 ,�1 :�,s.� _ f-c � ` "r '�'-f�i zF� :Y�� ,s¢s�.T,s�°n�`s�", r .,f`is;�%'` i i � �i_i ' 7 • - �• T7, • • 1 1 1 1 l 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 • .•. !. !A%_A, r;}. `,�T- '`-i ''-. - Y �- .z j`.,• rev.. --ts:t f n�_ �v.r,..:;:2.;- - • • • • 1 i • y��yS i 1, a,,✓ s r.f. • • n '• ,r �"> 1 4s�- n`; • _ • 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $will : • _s__ w� � K'a' 3c°r �� �-/�c` 7755-x- -• • s .7#^ • Y hJ.,,'�-.�`" ��-,-yf�": � ; Y; ae. �, i,f�..�4 sc. ' • • • •• • • • UNIN MIST, .i- ri y e ,;-;' _,t��a�•--s-_`4'i=a;t,.a -r .,� ,.-.._ _ 4;�.,>.:r� e.;. _i�,�*5�.: _ S�^Sx�;.. -.�"Y'=. �M�..» •., -• • • 1 AMWr • E�oR,C:- s"�rN .� �° • �i - �..3 t:"t�.- '<`��. .„i F`-ems.yR .!'.r Y'a.. �r y w _ �..5 �.X"- °y ' � e{ ',..��wv�.. _:� s u a { ��'; � s-*�•�is �t,z.,v .=ay=.� �x?'sc�r= < .s�%"' , •1 e - • 11 II •. �� � a,s :'�'.�- - - - 9 _ _ .let _ „c t __ ''�SxzS.t- �a["'� x• _ i r •.1 11 • -".. � s _.1..A '`1 /1 :a,l I i3a r.� z. ^-'�;.�e x.�a.3 _ N _ -- • - • 1 1 •- 1 • MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner DES 3 2003 From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Date: 12/3/03 f2-1 RE: App 03-83P, Berry Patch II Site Development Plan have reviewed the plans for the Berry Patch II Site Development Plan and I have the following comments about these plans. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions. 1. Show a curtain drain around the uphill (south)side of the driveway on Sheet 4A. 2. Please name the roads in these new sections. 3. Label the contour in the rear access drive to the Village at Buckland Court. 4. Label the dumpster pads on sheet 413 5. The sanitary sewer lateral from building 6 does not go to the proposed sanitary sewer. 6. Show the stream channel on the Katten Property 7. Check the grades of the driveways around the units. These grades should be kept as low as possible, especially on the curves. The 10% grade from Sta 30+50 to Sta 33 is too steep for the curves and main access drive to these units. Also it looks like it is greater than 10% on sheet 4B plan view. Show the grading of the intersection by Sta 32+23 and Sta 44+40 where two 10% slopes meet. How will this work. 8. Check the grades by the parking spaces as they should not have a cross slope greater than 5% because it is difficult to keep them clear of ice and the slope makes it difficult to get into and out of vehicles. Also, the handicap spaces can not have a grade greater than 2% in any direction. The grades look too steep in the parking spaces in the areas of Sta 1+50, 3+50, 7+75, 11+50, 33+00, 35+50, 40+75, 43+50, 51+00, and 54+75. 9. The grade change at Sta 9+25 and 9+75 are too close together. Suggest this be eliminated and the driveway grade be changed to a constant slope from Sta 9+00 to Sta 11+00. 10. Is the construction sequence on Sheet 10 representative of the planned construction sequence for this development? This is different from the way Berry Patch is being constructed. 11. Add a note on detail sheet 11 by the Reinforced Retaining Wall Section— Prior to construction of the retaining wall, a plan approved and stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed in Connecticut shall be submitted to the Town Engineering Department. 12. The pavement cross section detail shows a constant 2% cross slope (superelevated). This does not agree with the CB TF elevations that are the same on different sides of the pavement. The pavement should have a crowned cross section because of the steep slopes. 13. Show a detail for the median in the driveway from about Sta 30+50 to Sta 31+90 14. What is the TF elevation for the outlet structure from the detention basin? 15. The detention basin needs to have an emergency overflow spillway. 16. Show the roof leaders from the buildings on sheet 4A and the center of building 6 on sheet 4B. 17. The pipes from YD1 to CB 1 and CB 2 to CB 3 need to be changed to Class V RCP as the slope is 10% or greater. Any other pipes with slopes of 10% or greater need to be Class V RCP. 18. 1 have reviewed the drainage report that was submitted and I have many questions. My biggest concern is with the rationale of using detention from one property to account for an increase in runoff from another separate property and how this was calculated. It must be shown that there are no deleterious downstream effects from this development. This includes no increase in the peak flow downstream, the ability of the existing culverts at Buckland Road, Deming Street, and Clark Street to handle the flow, and no increase in erosion or sediment transport downstream due to this development. I think the Katten property has potentially highly erodable soils in and around the stream channel. There is presently significant amounts of sediment deposited in the culvert under Buckland Road and further downstream. The drainage report and designs need to be revised to show that there is no deleterious downstream impacts from this development. 19. 1 also have questions about details in the drainage report including the developed and impervious area used, how CN and Tc were figured, why the 10 yr flow calculated for the drainage pipe design is 19-23% greater than the peak runoff calculated using the TR-55 method, where all the roofs drain, and others. 20. The drainage report needs to include a gutter flow analysis for the placement of the catch basins and a headwater analysis for the system. 21. Infiltration needs to be considered for the roof runoff from these buildings. 22. Soils information needs to be included for these sites. 23. A 4 foot fence needs to be installed along the top of all retaining or stone walls with a drop over 4 feet. 24. The sidewalks should be moved away from the driveways and parking areas to provide at least a 4 foot snow shelf along the driveways and a 2-3 foot shelf for car bumpers by the parking areas. 25. The sidewalks need to be designed so the grades are less than 8%(ADA requirement). 26. Continuous stone walls between buildings 8 & 6 and 9 & 10 on the south side would help alleviate some of the grading problems with the sidewalks. 27. Show HC ramps and crosswalks where the sidewalk from the Berry Patch I connect to the units on the Calvary Church property. 28. There also need to be sidewalks connecting Berry Patch I to the units on the Katten property and ramps and crosswalks between units 7 and 6/8. 29. Where are the topsoil piles to be located? I could not find these on the plans. 30. Is all of Berry Patch II to have BCLC? I could not find this labeled on the plans. 31. These sites are extremely tight which make them difficult to construct and may compromise circulation for vehicles and pedestrians. 32. The manholes along the cross country sewer line need to have watertight covers and frames with gaskets and locking screws. Include this detail in the plans. 33. WPCA approval is needed for this project. hin & One American Row Hartford, Connecticut 06103-2819 G' .gTa,nLLP COUNSELORS AT LAW Phone: (860) 251-5000 Timothy S. Hollister Phone: (860) 251-5601 Fax: (860) 251-5699 thollister@goodwin.com 03 December 4, 2003 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Timothy Wentzell, Chair, and Commission Members Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Ms. Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Metro Realty Group, Ltd.; Application for Age-Restricted Housing Dear Mr. Wentzell, Commission Members, and Ms. Banach: Our office is advising The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. on the matter of its application for special permit/site development plan approval for a 94 unit, age-restricted apartment complex on Parcel 51-32 and a portion of Parcel 38-2, as more particularly shown on plan entitled, 'Berry Patch II, Site Development Plan/Special Exception, Buckland Road&Deming Street, South Windsor, Connecticut." These units have been designed and will be financed and operated as "assisted housing" pursuant to the definition of that term at § 8-30g of the General Statutes. As such,this housing will receive financial assistance from the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority ("CHFA") for the construction of housing for low and moderate income persons over the age of 62. Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g, an Affordability Plan is hereby provided to the Commission as part of the application materials. It indicates that the applicant will administer the Plan for the duration of the affordability restrictions (a minimum of 40 years) unless transferred with notice to the Commission. Hartford Stamford Lakeville Greenwich December 4, 2003 Page 2 The Affordability Plan also includes the following: 1. an affirmative fair housing marketing plan governing the rental of units; 2. a calculation of the maximum rents under today's median income for the area; 3. a commitment that 79 percent of the units will be affordable; and 4. a sample Declaration and Agreement of Restrictive Covenants, the terms of which will be amended to reflect CHFA mortgage obligations for this development and project specific, should this development plan be approved by the Commission. Please note that Berry Patch II is proposed as "assisted housing" (not a "set aside development")under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g due to Metro Realty's use of CHFA financing. As such, Metro Realty will administer the Affordability Plan in accordance with its agreement with CHFA, a copy of which is incorporated into the Plan. Berry Patch II will provide the Town of South Windsor with 75 additional affordable units on the State's "10 percent list." Please call me should you require any additional information regarding the income and age restrictions for this development and the manner in which these restrictions will be administered. Very truly yours, ,�)a 40�- Timothy S. Hollister TSH:ekf 359530 c: Geoffrey W. Sager Lewis K. Wise,Esq. DEC-05-2003 13:30 FROM-Metro Realty +8606776919 T-732 P.002/003 F-530 BERRYPATCHIIASSO CI, TES LIMITED pARTN,VRS, November 24,2003 Mr.Peter T. SangerY o,Jr. Village Retirement Communities 715 Putnam Pike Greenville,RI 02828 Re: Berry Patch Expansion Dear Mr. Sangermano: The ,fog of South Windsor has recommended that we obtain an emergency over the Village at Buekland Court property. Attached is a tan the access easement II Site Development Plan/Special$xception, Buckland Road n the T.an ) entitled,Berry patch Connecticut, prepared by]Design Professionals, Inc., November 4, 2003gSheets 1 and She Street South et Windsor, depicting the Proposed location of the em,�.geIIcY access easement. Please also notice that B is a sidewalk adjacent to the emergency access easement which is strictly for pedestrian use,there We have assured you that (l) the emergency access easement will be for ewer encY purpose's only, (2) the emergency access easement and the sidewalk will be constructed and (lawn, snow, ice, plantings, etc.) so long as it is in existence at our cost, and shall be sub ecned Your approval an aesthetic details and appearance. have further assured you that we will We Provide you with an indermfcation from liability relat have to the emergency access and sidewalk and that we will provide you with cert�fre'a of insurance ann easement Y In consideration of the granting of the emergency easenzeut, Berry patch II Associates Limited Partnership agrees to, at its cost (including without limitation, site Parking lines and landscaping), grading, asphalt, painting of P g), to construct up to twenty (20) parking spaces located near the Gazebo in the area designated by The Village at Buckland Court' Furthermore, the plan shows an 8,,pVC sewer tie-in at tha entrance to the Village Court. We have assured you that the sewer lateral construction tie-in will be Performed Bucicland the min-imam of disturbance to your daily operation, and 2 at a time or Mimes that ou approve. i) ith The undersigned will bear all costs and,expenses of cons tr eting same, inclt�din but not Y to policeman to direct trade in the event that you feel that;is necessary. g limited also maintain said sewer lateral for so long as the Berry: zpa The undersigned will existence. tch Apartment Conn...nity is in G Executive Dri ve,S tuf a Qo • rarmtngton,'CT 06032 Z853� 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax -- P_UIVarltuy Dcvelo�tmonislQaryP�tJr ll1LcltaslSa amanp pc_-p=&C 11-24-03,dor DEC-05-2003 13:33 FROM—Metro Realty +8606776919 T-732 P.003/003 F-530 All of the foregoing is intended to be memorialized in an easement agreement the which are subject to Village at Buckland Court approval and shall be recorded on the South Windsor land records in the event that the South Windsor Town Planning and Zanin Commission grants approvals for the proposed Berry Patch expansion, g f Would you kindly acknowledge your agreement in concept with the fare b retuzxiing to me the enclosed copy of this letter? gof Y suing and Thank you. Very Truly Yours, B>sR.l2'Y PATCH B ASSOCIATES LIMITI?D pARTN3ItSHIP BY. Berry Patch R G, B . - Geoffxey W. e emb AGREpD AND ACCEPTED By: Name: kr' � Title: Date: / Marcia Banach - Police responses Page 1 1 From: MD Reed To: Marcia Banach Date: 12/5/03 10:50AM Subject: Police responses Marcia, Attached is a document with some raw statistics on police responses. I figured I would just give you the raw data and you could present it in whatever format you want. It looks as though these new developments do require police service but the number of police responses do not appear to be disproportionate when compared to responses to other areas in town. While we may get more medical assist type calls in a senior housing area,we get fewer youth problems and other types of complaints. I did not review the stats with an eye toward types of police responses. I only looked at the total number of police responses, which includes all types of responses. CC: Lewis, Gerry; Lipe, Michele; Sgt. Richard Riggs; Tyler, Gary f, MEMORANDUM -town f 0 TO: Marcia Banach South FROM: Sgt. Matt Reed Windsor DATE: 8-Dec-03 Police Services SUBJECT: Police Response Statistics These statistics cover a period of May 2001 — June 2003. Street Name/Neighborhood Calls for Service Wapping Mews/Elm St 109 Flax Hill 35 Collins Crossing/Hunter Dr 20 Collins Hill/Cit view Terr& Vista View Dr 3 Porter's Share/Share's La 26 W ndemere Court 25 Pleasant Meadows/Garden Cir 32 Wheeler Estates/Kebalo La 10 Strawberry Fields/Dzen's Wy& Strawberry La 31 Watson Circle 6 Norma Rd 7 Greenfield Drive 17 HenryRd 15 Meadow Rd 5 Overlook Rd 20 Brook St 42 Farmstead Dr 58 Farnham Rd 88 McGrath Rd 6 Debbie Dr 113 Lisa Dr 84 Natsisky Farm Rd 76 Benedict Dr 265 Pine Tree La 65 Quarry Brook Dr 247 Main St 1860 Wood Pond Rd 77 Rustic La 39 Foxhill Rd 21 Rockledge Dr 28 Riverside Dr 21 Rimfield Dr 46 Carson Wy 23 Heatherwood 20 Perrin Wy 24 Kellog Cir 6 Jared Ct 4 Tuttle Cir 5 Arthur Dr 62 Foncine La 36 Cinnamon Springs 153 Misty Meadow 56 Sunfield 35 Candlewood 483 Twin Circle 384 Mill Pond Dr 292 Amato Dr 246 Ivy Ln 98 St. Marc Circle 340 949 Pleasant Valley Rd 472 125 Buckland Hills Dr(Target) 1032 31 Buckland Hills Dr Lowe's 851 • �� � �44 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants made this_day of December,2003 by Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership('Declarant"),a Connecticut limited partnership with an office c/o The Metro Realty Group,Ltd.,6 Executive Drive, Farmington,CT 06032. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Declarant is the owner of certain property in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,which property is described on Exhibit A attached hereto(the"Property");and WHEREAS,in order to comply with the requirements of a certain special permit granted by the Planning&Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor under Section 4.1 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations,Declarant wishes to subject the Property to certain restrictions. NOW,THEREFORE,Declarant does hereby declare and establish that,as long as the Property is zoned to allow elderly housing pursuant to the South Windsor Zoning Regulations,or for a period of forty(40)years,whichever is longer,the Property shall be subject to the following restrictions: 1. The architecture,colors,heights,materials and floor plan comprising each building and the site plan shall be subject to the prior written approval of the South Windsor Housing Authority or its successor. Any change of the same shall require the prior written approval of said Authority. 2. The maintenance of the buildings and landscaping shall be consistent with the level and quality of landscaping and maintenance at Watson Farm,Deming Street, South Windsor,Connecticutprevkied4);s a lrority-fer-its-develepment-adjacent-to t#te &Ubject-property. 3. Each dwelling unit on the Property shall be occupied by: (a) Persons who are 62 years of age or older. (b) A spouse of an occupant pursuant to(a)above. (c) An occupant pursuant to(b)above who survives his or her spouse. (d) An occupant pursuant to(b)above whose spouse has entered into a long term health care facility. 11CaplangTocuments\Public\RKabakoff\MetrU\Berry_Patch\Declaration of Restrictive Covenants clean.doc 12/08/031 t/11/03339 PNS.404 M (e) Regarding subparagraph(c)and(d)above,in the event of the remarriage or cohabitation by the remaining spouse,all occupants must comply with the occupancy requirements set forth in this Section 3. 4. It is understood and agreed that this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is intended to run with the land and subject any successor owners of the Property to its terms. In this respect this Declaration shall be recorded in the land records for the Town of South Windsor. It is further understood and agreed that this Declaration may be enforced by(i)the Town of South Windsor or(ii)the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission, (iii)the South Windsor Housing Authority,or(iv)any combination of the foregoing bodies. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Declarant has hereby executed this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants this_day of December,2003. Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership By: Berry PatchGP,LLC its General partner By: Geoffrey W. Sager Its Managing Member STATE OF CONNECTICUT) )ss: COUNTY OF ) Personally appeared the said Geoffrey W. Sager,Managing Member of Berry Patch GP,LLC,general partner of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership,signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court Notary Public My Commission Expires \\CaplanlDoeilnients\Puvilc\RKiibakoff\MetrolBg Patch\Declaration..of_Restrictive_Covenants_ clean.doc ' lS 12/08/031-1/11/033:39 PM-2.*0 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION \\CaplaiiWocnnients\Public\RKnbakeff\MetrnlBerry Patch\Declaration_of Restrictive Covenants clean.doc 12/08/0311/1-1/03 :39 PM_2-.004)M R.E Hagearty &Associates, Inc. Real Estate Analysis, Consulting and Valuation 92 Connecticut Boulevard Tel. (860) 282-0851 P.O. Box 280125 Fax (860) 282-9522 East Hartford,CT 06128-0125 Sean T. Hagearty, MAI Presentation to South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission December 9, 2003 MARKET VALUE IMPACT ANALYSIS: SCOPE OF WORK To develop an opinion as to whether or not the proposed expansion of the Berry Patch project will have an impact upon adjacent single-family property values, the following steps were performed: ■ The existing Berry Patch and proposed expansion site areas were inspected. ■ The surrounding neighborhood was inspected, in particular the cul-de-sac road Grandview Terrace to gauge the views to and from the subject site. ■ Reviewed the proposed site plan and architectural plans to assess what the finished project will look like. ■ Analyzed and considered qualitative factors that can impact purchase and sale decisions for single-family homes such as traffic flow, view, neighborhood land use trends. ■ Performed a quantitative analysis focusing upon single-family home sales within a close proximity to other similar projects completed by the developer to determine if their development was a negative influence upon property values. ■ The developer's first project in town, Watson Farm, and their second most recently completed project, Orchard Ridge in Berlin, were selected for a detailed study. Single- family home sales in the period extending from the time when these projects started construction through to the present were reviewed. For all sales where there was a prior sale occurring post 1990, a resale percentage was calculated and then compared to the general median price level trend for the town for the same approximate time period. ■ Please refer to the summary tables and attachments for more detail. ■ Data sources included Multiple Listing Service, The Commercial Record, various municipal offices in South Windsor, Berlin,Newington and Rocky Hill, and interviews with some area property owners and real estate agents o MARKET VALUE IMPACT ANALYSIS: SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ■ A review of the limited sale-resale dataset in proximity to Watson Farm does not indicate any negative impact upon single-family property values as a result of the Watson Farm project. However, the dataset is very limited and the proximity of the Buckland retail district overrides other locational features. ■ A review of the home sales and resales in the proximity of the Orchard Ridge project in Berlin (portions of Berlin, Newington and Rocky Hill) does not indicate any negative impact upon single-family property values as a result of the Orchard Ridge project. More than half of the sales analyzed showed a higher increase in value than that witnessed by the town overall. ■ The already approved and proposed Berry Patch projects do conform to the existing land use trend in the neighborhood as they represent a transition from single-family homes along and off Deming Street to the assisted living facility on Buckland Street. ■ An elderly apartment complex does not generate significant traffic and whatever traffic that is created will flow out onto existing arterial roads, having minimal effect upon subdivision streets in the immediate area. ■ With the exception of surface parking, the proposed apartment complex is designed to blend in with other residential developments and will not dominate the landscape. ■ While some adjacent landowners will have their views altered by the addition of the subject it has to be noted that it is only a matter of time before the existing vacant land is developed in some fashion. It is a question of what and when, not if. ■ Based upon my review of the qualitative and quantitative factors analyzed, it is my opinion that the proposed expansion of the Berry Patch elderly apartment complex will not have a negative impact upon single-family home values in the neighborhood. South Windsor Summary of Sale-Resale Activity Neighborhood Study Area Address Date Price Prior Sale Prior Price %Change % Change Market 462 Avery Street 4/24/02 $117,101 7/25/97 $97,500 20.10% 33.76% 362 Avery Street 7/31/02 $209,000 8/16/93 $145,900 43.25% 40.00% 510 Avery Street 9/20/02 $162,900 10/1/87 $136,900 18.99% 10.85% 648 Avery Street 2/25/02 $175,000 3/l/91 $156,000 12.18% 16.83% 430 Avery Street 6/25/03 $203,000 5/29/98 $149,000 36.24% 50.64% 491 Avery Street 12/1/03 $206,000 9/25/98 $137,000 50.36% 50.64% 65 Mohegan Trail 5/16/03 $297,500 2/5/01 $257,000 15.76% 30.55% 115 Mohegan Trail 2/25/03 $266,000 1/24/97 $156,000 70.51% 49.68% 170 Orchard Hill Rd 11/21/03 $314,900 6/20/96 $202,500 55.51% 40.72% Notes The % Change Market column is based upon the closest calendar year to calendar year median price increase for all single family homes in the town as reported by The Commercial Record. Please note that the increase from 2002 to year-to-date 2003 is very significant in and of itself. The homes where the sales prices appreciated at slower rate than the general market are in bold. The dataset is really too small to draw any material conclusions. The apparent slower-than-market appreciation rates for the homes on Deming Street is most likely due to the new shopping center at the corner of Avery Street and Deming Street as opposed to the subject or any other issue. Berlin /Newington /Rocky Hill Summary of Sale-Resale Activity Neighborhood Study Area Address Date Price Prior Sale Prior Price %Change %Change Market Berlin No Sale-Resales Available Newington 103 Apple Hill 9/6/02 $270,500 6/26/97 $187,000 44.65% 39.34% 104 Apple Hill 3/21/02 $250,000 6/10/97 $195,000 28.21% 39.34% 115 Apple Hill 12/03/01 $235,000 9/5/91 $184,900 27.09% 9.52% 12 Apple Hill 8/29/03 $182,500 4/28/93 $139,900 30.45% 43.24% 38 Apple Hill 4/22/02 $171,000 5/25/99 $141,000 21.28% 30.87% 76 Apple Hill 8/17/01 $200,000 4/22/88 $188,400 6.16% -10.24% 17 Apple Hill 5/28/03 $195,000 10/13/93 $145,900 33.65% 43.24% 67 Apple Hill 8/01/02 $190,000 06/21/99 $106,000 79.24% 30.87% 85 Apple Hill 4/30/02 $200,000 3/3/89 $179,900 11.17% 4.94% 87 Apple Hill 12/01/00 $183,900 10/24/88 $179,900 2.22% -17.65% 95 Apple Hill 06/06/01 $255,000 $189,900 34.28% 8 Bernston Way 6/30/03 $267,000 4/30/92 $206,000 29.61% 21.64% 16 Brooks Edge Dr 10/25/01 $164,900 08/03/98 $116,000 42.16% 19.14% 05/21/92 $139,000 9 Brooks Edge Dr 09/10/02 $198,000 07/01/99 $144,500 37.02% 30.87% 15 Brooks Edge Dr 06/28/03 $167,500 05/03/99 $124,900 34.11% 42.80% 89 Candlewyck Dr 06/27/03 $205,000 04/27/01 $186,000 10.22% 21.64% 263 Candlewyck Dr 11/09/01 $278,000 04/01/98 $211,000 31.75% 19.14% 36 Coachmen Lane 7/31/02 $365,000 6/15/98 $301,735 20.97% 13.33% Berlin /Newington /Rocky Hill Summary of Sale-Resale Activity Neighborhood Study Area Address Date Price Prior Sale Prior Price %Change %Change Market Newington(Continued) 16 Cortland Way 02/14/03 $195,000 05/01/96 $127,000 53.54% 54.58% 24 Cortland Way 04/09/01 $137,000 09/11/87 $147,900 -7.37% -10.24% 34 Cortland Way 12/29/02 $192,000 11/6/97 $130,000 47.69% 39.34% 60 Cortland Way 07/17/01 $145,000 08/10/99 $129,000 12.40% 17.40% 12/01/94 $121,000 6.61% 39 Cortland Way 08/09/01 $142,000 03/01/97 $117,300 21.06% 25.00% 49 Cortland Way 10/29/01 $150,000 12/20/96 $106,000 41.51% 27.08% 53 Cortland Way 03/31/03 $150,000 9/11/94 $112,000 33.93% 45.49% 59 Cortland Way 09/26/02 $154,900 07/16/99 $125,000 23.92% 30.87% 10/01/97 $118,500 3.44% 09/01/96 $116,500 1.72% 73 Cortland Way 11/13/03 $165,000 04/18/01 $134,000 23.13% 21.64% 79 Cortland Way 07/05/01 $140,000 06/01/00 $134,500 4.09% 9.71% 85 Cortland Way 08/30/02 $146,000 05/07/01 $135,000 8.15% 11.40% 87 Cortland Way 03/31/03 $141,000 05/01/92 $122,000 +15.57% 40.53% 06/01/91 $130,000 15 Kowal Court 05/30/02 $204,000 09/29/98 $154,000 32.47% 32.81% Berlin /Newington /Rocky Hill Summary of Sale-Resale Activity Neighborhood Study Area Address Date Price Prior Sale Prior Price %Change %Change Market Newington(Continued) 188 Lam lighter Lane 10/15/01 $295,000 11/29/94 $227,000 29.61% 19.61% 322 Lamplighter Lane 05/14/01 $205,000 12/01/92 $177,000 15.82% 15.53% 79 Little Brook Drive 09/15/03 $300,000 09/01/90 $215,000 39.53% 23.67% 16 Shady Hill Drive 11/28/00 $228,000 06/19/98 $205,000 -3.07% 9.30% 06/01/93 $211,500 11.22% 48 Shady Hill Drive 07/30/02 $275,000 11/30/98 $205,000 34.15% 32.81% 15 Sunny Brook Drive 06/09/01 $179,900 10/08/92 $145,000 24.07% 15.53% 29 Sunny Brook Drive 09/04/01 $179,000 04/01/94 $135,500 32.10% 19.61% Rocky Hill 60 Andover Drive 9/22//03 $449,900 1/13/93 $350,000 28.54% 47.76% 150 Cobey Road 8/5/03 $389,000 1/28/91 $309,000 25.89% 49.80% 947 New Britain Avenue 4/1/03 $225,000 2/6/01 $149,000 51.01% 31.71% Notes The % Change Market column is based upon the closest calendar year to calendar year median price increase for all single family homes in the town as reported by The Commercial Record. The significant increase in partial year 2003 is a major factor. The homes where the sales prices appreciated at slower rate than the general market are in bold. Of the 41 sale-resales analyzed, only 16 or 39% apparently lagged the market in terms of price appreciation. Furthermore, many of those 16 appreciated at a percentage rate that was close to the market average. Rocky Hill Year Months Price % Change 2003 Through Sept. $ 230,500 18.21% 2002 All $ 195,000 11.43% 2001 All $ 175,000 11.29% 2000 All $ 157,250 -1.72% 1999 All $ 160,000 11.11% 1998 All $ 144,000 1.41% 1997 All $ 142,000 2.53% 1996 All $ 138,500 -7.67% 1995 All $ 150,000 3.45% 1994 All $ 145,000 -7.05% 1993 All $ 156,000 4.61% 1992 All $ 149,125 -3.17% 1991 All $ 154,000 -9.41% 1990 All $ 170,000 N/A Newington Year Months Price % Change 2003 Through Sept. $ 185,500 9.12% 2002 All $ 170,000 11.48% 2001 All $ 152,500 9.01% 2000 All $ 139,900 7.70% 1999 All $ 129,900 1.48% 1998 All $ 128,000 4.92% 1997 All $ 122,000 1.67% 1996 All $ 120,000 -1.64% 1995 All $ 122,000 -4.31% 1994 All $ 127,500 -1.54% 1993 All $ 129,500 -1.89% 1992 All $ 132,000 -5.21% 1991 All $ 139,250 -7.17% 1990 All $ 150,000 N/A South Windsor Year Months Price % Change 2003 Through Sept. $ 235,000 11.90% 2002 All $ 210,000 16.67% 2001 All $ 180,000 1.41% 2000 All $ 177,500 8.23% 1999 All $ 164,000 5.13% 1998 All $ 156,000 -0.64% 1997 All $ 157,000 -5.99% 1996 All $ 167,000 7.71% 1995 All $ 155,050 0.03% 1994 All $ 155,000 3.33% 1993 All $ 150,000 -11.76% 1992 All $ 170,000 -5.42% 1991 All $ 179,750 -2.84% 1990 All $ 185,000 N/A Source:The Commercial Record Proxmity Area Study, Watson Farm, South Windsor LL 0 IV S" C 0.572 mi a Qi A Qi 1A CL, 30 Aff q .......... outh Windsor A x6i Z "V k /Z Study it--63 qr i� 3: .. ........ ............. !ff Qs V smittr'-st to 1 L# L "' Manche 3 A0 4- & "V- 'A-A A �k 1%)*-voll 0 Mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 J 0.8 1 Copyright 1988-2000 Microsoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.con-dStreets @Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology,Inc.All rights reserved.@ 1999 Navigation Technologies.All rights reserved.This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities @)Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page 1 Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. Proxmity Area Study, Orchard Ridge, Berlin r' m c $ ddeC..C7r C? rn o �H ttt--LA � V httew 3. ~~d m cane 1 73 t .:,. ` aCIA Rd a n9 ridge cs? 1so::: ., ; \teens Dr Newington t Eta S Foster St U 5 pSteU C" „.. Rd ... .15 950 ml.. Kelsey„ w60 . ; :,We b Hill o Rocky t OrchardSt- Ridge { �Q' �� t'dn�'e west Webster Street Berlin fBttCv' Be Theater �`�! c1)` �' 3 t r co191 Exit "' 13erUn / l 160 NN: CD Deatng z 6 Roliing t8reens� Gofourse s�fld.w{� r w - r' 0 mi 0.5 1 1.5 Copyright©1988-2000 Microsoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/Streets ©Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology,Inc.All rights reserved.©1999 Navigation Technologies.All rights reserved.This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page ©Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. Proxmity Area Study, Berry Farm, South Windsor 61 soo6. pr o 194 eezy Hill c C / Dr Rd N South Windsor ate rt m CouAl?, / V@/ a� Wappinga ® NeW Wapping 4" Cemetery •, Or _ . 9� Rdg 30 e-;EAIn n n, Berry Farm ......, v; Proximity Area Study \ 7p/� x South Windsor ~ S . n o t. k oF, 17.3 yds Qr oh O o 0 500 mi 6 U�td�n South Windsor /y dr• co. 30. 0mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Copyright©1988-2000 Microsoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.corrvStreets ©Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology,Inc.All rights reserved.©1999 Navigation Technologies.All rights reserved.This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page ©Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. r'Kelli Koehler Berry Patch Il.doc Page 1 DEC 1 2003 PLANNING DEPARMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan,Fred Shaw,Michael Gantick,Tom Fields,Bill Lanning,Jeff Doolittle Kris Lindstrom,Ray Favreau,Karl Reichle,Mel Stead, Chris Dougan,Bob Deptula Dennis Sheridan FROM: Marcia A. Banach,AICP,Director of Planning The Planning&Engineering Departments have received plans for the following projects: 03-83P,Berry Patch 11-Housing for the Elderly Location: Easterly of Buckland Road, Southerly of Oakland Road, northerly of Deming Street Site Plan Subdivision No. Acres 30+ Zone GD,AA-30, FP Industrial Commercial Residential No. Lots/Units 96 Water: Public Private Well Sewerage: Public Septic System 96 Housing for the Elderly Apartments Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No new street(s) new detention area new open space/recreation area active passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by 11/22/03 and return to the Planning Department. We see this as positive for the community while anticipating a requisite need for increased services for our ever expanding senior population. Sorry for the late response. D. Sheridan,Director of Human Services I MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Jeff Folger, Environmental Planner RECEIVE[ IWA/CC Members DEC 1 7 2003 From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer 19 SOUTH W!NDSOR PLANNING DEPT, Date: 12/17/03 RE: App 03-83P, Berry Patch II Site Development Plan I have received a revised drainage design and revised calculations for the Berry Patch II Site Development Plan. The drainage design for the Katten parcel now includes a detention basin as well as a water quality swale. The calculations show that this system will reduce the developed peak runoff to below existing pre-development rates for all storm events ranging from 2 year to 100 year from the Katten parcel. The Calvary parcel still includes a large detention/infiltration basin and the peak runoff from this parcel will also be reduced for all storm events, as a result of the proposed drainage design. The revised drainage calculations also address other questions I had concerning the details of these drainage calculations. In summary, the revised drainage calculations and design satisfy my previous concerns about the stormwater flows from this proposed development. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions. December 19,2003 D E C 2 3 2003 SOUTH'VA,,I'DSO\PL t!N iNG DEPT Vincent Attianese 33 Sele Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Wentzell, My wife and I are submitting this letter to you to express our concern and opposition to the Berry Patch II Proposal. This proposal, as I understand, is for Affordable Senior Housing Rental Units. This proposal involves two parcels of land: one parcel located within the Gateway zone, and second parcel located in a Residence AA Zone. Our concern and opposition relates to the impact on surrounding property value and the further precedent this establishes if approved. Since one parcel of land is located within the Residence AA Zone, the proposal must conform to the Residence AA Zone—permitted uses. Under section 4.2.8, "Such uses will be allowed only when the Commission has determined that:" "(3) Surrounding property values will be conserved". Thus, consideration of the surrounding property values must be considered in order to comply. Property value overall can be a subjective topic, especially when discussing Senior Housing. However,the fact remains that this is"Affordable,Rental"type housing. I believe,these facts are well understood and may be referred to as "low income rentals". While this may not be the intention of the proposal, it may/can be perceived that way by a potential homebuyer. Additionally, affordable rentals are not typically found within upper scale neighborhoods. At the least,this will be a potential homebuyers negotiation point. Thus, a negative impact for surrounding property owners. Please consider, if you were considering purchasing property or a home in an upper scale neighborhood and found out that "Affordable Rentals"were nearby,would that give rise for concern, questions, etc.? I believe most would have concern, and would negatively impact their decisions and actions. Please consider the above relative to surrounding property values and the further precedent this will establish. Please reject this proposal, as we believe it is not in the best interest for those who live nearby. Should you have any questions or like to further discuss the above, feel free to contact us. Thank you for your time and consideration. Y ^VAwa Vincent Attianese n MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning REcz/VZD From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer' JAN 9 Date: 1/9/04 800ryWINNsoR 2004 RE: App 03-83P, Berry Patch II Site Development Plan P44NN/NGD£p1 I have reviewed the revised plans dated 12/12/03 for the Berry Patch II Site Development Plan and I have the following comments about these plans. 1. Show a curtain drain around the uphill (south)side of the driveway on Sheet 4A. 2. Please name the roads in these new sections. 3. Check the grades of the driveways around the units. These grades should be kept as low as possible, especially on the curves. The 10% grade from Sta 30+50 to Sta 33 is too steep for the curves and main access drive to these units. Also it looks like it is greater than 10% on sheet 4B plan view. The grading of the intersection by Sta 32+23 and Sta 44+40 where two 10% slopes meet will be awkward. Check the top of frame elevation for CB#1 and CB#2. 4. Check the grades by the parking spaces as they should not have a cross slope greater than 5% because it is difficult to keep them clear of ice and the slope makes it difficult to get into and out of vehicles. Also, the handicap spaces can not have a grade greater than 2% in any direction. The grades look too steep for the parking spaces in the areas of Sta 7+75, 11+50, 35+50, and 54+75. 5. The grade changes at Sta 9+25 and 9+75, and Sta 37+00 and 37+50 are too close together. Suggest these be eliminated and the driveway grade be changed to a constant slope in these areas. 6. The detail for the median in the driveway from Sta 30+00 to Sta 32+18 needs to include a note as to the treatment of this median, ie.will it be landscaped, grassed or paved. 7. The overflow spillway from the detention basin on the Calvary Property needs to be extended toward the outlet structure so it begins at the top of frame elevation of the outlet structure or lower. 8. Note 10 about installing a 4 foot fence along the top of all retaining or stone walls with a drop over 4 feet needs to be included on sheets 4A and 4B. 9. Label the sidewalks along Buckland Road and the walk between the units on the Katten property and Buckland Road. Include construction details for these walks. 10. Add a note to the Typical Sidewalk Section detail that the sidewalk is 5 feet wide where it is adjacent to parking spaces. 11. Include a detail for the 10 foot gravel access drive on the Katten property. 12. The sewer lateral from the Katten property has a very low slope (0.4%) which is less than the typical slope of 2% and less than the minimum slope of 0.5%. This slope needs to be increased and/or calculations provided that the sewer flows in this line will have minimum cleansing velocities of 2.5 fps. ti ` 13. Verify the invert elevation where the sewer lateral will tie into the sewer from the Village at Buckland Court. The as-built plan for the Village at Buckland Court has different information. 14. Note that sanitary sewer manholes 2, 3, 4 and 5 along the cross country sewer line need to have watertight covers and frames with gaskets and locking screws. 15. Label the size of the sanitary sewer pipes and DMH1 on Sheet 4B. 16. The top of the berm around the stormwater detention area on the Katten property needs to be raised at least 0.2 feet so there is at least 1 foot of freeboard above the 100 year flow elevation. 17. Submit calculations and plans showing the volume of the area excavated for flood storage on the Katten property is at least equal to the 100 year flood plain storage volume lost to filling on this property. 18. WPCA approval is needed for this project. Please call me(x 245)if you have any questions. Marcia Banach ,,,Berry Patch Pa e 1 From: "Geoff Sager"<gsager@metro-realty.com> To: <banach@southwindsor.org> Date: 1/12/04 1:03PM Subject: Berry Patch Marcia, on the question of impact of our senior housing developments an the Town's demographics, can you kindly take a look at the following: 1. -65+ population in South Windsor is 12.3%of population now. 65+will be 13.2% in 2008(source: ESRI Demographics)- I will fax to you. 2. 65+ population in south Windsor was 11.88% at the time of the 2000 Census-as per DECD website. http://www.ct.gov/ecd/LI B/ecd/2000census/2000_census_Profile_DP-1.xls 3. 65+ population for the Hartford County at the time of the 2000 Census was 14.66% -as per DECD website-same link. 4. 65+ population for the State of Connecticut at the time of the 2000 Census was 13.81% It would appear that South Windsor is considerably younger than the State of Connecticut and Hartford County. If you took all our units existing and proposed (72 Watson, 198 Berry I and II)as 270 units and figure 1.3 persons per household (this is our actual experience at Watson and across our senior housing portfolio)or 351 people.Then assume(conservatively)2/3 of the 351 persons are new to the Town, there would be 234 persons "imported"to South Windsor age 65+. This is less than 1%and still does not offset the percentage by which South Windsor is younger than Hartford County and Connecticut overall. Finally, since our residents do not pay real estate taxes, they do not have a predisposition to vote against school referendums and the like. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, Connecticut 06032 (860)674 5641 (860)677-6919 gsager@metro-realty.com CC: <shagearty@hagearty.com> arcia`i8anach For Plannmg%Zonm /wetlands From: <ccm urdoch@earthl ink.net> To: <webmaster@southwindsor.org>, <town m anager@southwindsor.org>, <planning@southwindsor.org> Date: 1/12/04 7:08PM Subject: For Planning/Zoning/wetlands RE: Email from Web Site Name: Charles and Claire Murdoch Address: 35 Breezy Hill Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Phone: 644-2709 Email: ccmurdoch@earthlink.net January 12, 2004 Re: Berry Patch 11 To Planning and Zoning Commission, It is with interest that we have read about the plans for Berry Patch I and II in the papers. Since we find ourselves unable to attend the hearing tomorrow evening, we wanted to make our voices heard. We have no objection to senior housing, there is a need and we are in that age group. However, the addition of the second phase consisting of 94 more units near Deming Street and near Buckland Road is of concern. A development of 196 units would be the largest such development in town and we are concerned that apparently ALL traffic generated is to enter and exit on to Oakland Road. Please consider the following: 1) It is a busy road with speeding traffic 2) It is limited to single lanes in each direction 3) Elderly drivers especially can present safety concerns, to themselves and others, under these conditions. We already experience this to some degree from traffic from the other developments on and near Oakland Road. This can be due to changes in vision,judgement, perspective and reflexes etc. that are common in the aging process. 4)An accident effectively closes the road in both directions because of the narrowness of the road. 5)Traffic on Felt Road (either direction)at the light at Oakland currently is predominantly turning left or right which makes negotiating the intersection difficult at times. Encouraging exiting traffic from 196 housing units to use this intersection (and making turns)will only make this situation much worse and make safe egress from the development a problem, as well as for us from the homes north of Oakland using Felt. 6)Allowing traffic to exit only onto Oakland will certainly necessitate a longer trip for any destination to any of the shopping/professional areas in the Buckland area. It also will require them to navigate the busy"4 corner intersection"twice on any trip to that area, resulting in additonal strain on that intersection. 7) Housing developments for this age group experience frequent emergency medical calls with the attendant emergency vehicles responding.This can result in temporary road closures or difficulties in navigating around them within the complex.Alternative egress opportunities available would �Ulrcia'Banach For Planning/Zoning/wetlands be helpful for all vehicles under such situations. 8) Common sense would seem to dictate allowing units being built close to existing roads to have access to them.These additional units are not being built close to Oakland Road. For these reasons we believe requiring access to a development of this size from more than one street is a pre-requisite to approving additional units to be constructed. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Charles and Claire Murdoch 35 Breezy Hill Road South Windsor 644-2709 ,. f � �y i/— "��� � I� � �� � ; s ._A* � �i���`"/ o`';.s^.fi:.� .Z•Lr�vtt.�I�.� o i 0 Gar 7 A VV ��y,,Lvt�,i6L//�..��� �'.-2�'�--l�d���-l�i�=`T�.°`�/��'�`",� J �`�"/��''(✓N.dL'°/ `.�'y"�( '��/Lv``- 764�- i Ah Town of South Windsor Mr. Tim Wentzell 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Wentzell, My name is Carolyn Mirek and my husband, Ron, and I reside at 48 Sele Drive. We are writing to you in support of Berry Patch II providing that the following conditions promised by Metro Realty be met. 1. That they purchase 2 of three lots for the development of three single family homes of similar value to those homes located on Grandview Terrace and Sele Drive. We support the proposed 3-lot subdivision for residential homes. 2. That they propose a change for the Gateway Development commercial zone in the southeast corner to convert it to residential along with the three-lot sub division for single family homes along Deming Street. We support extending the residential zone. 3. That adequate landscape buffering be provided to the satisfaction of all abutting property owners on Grandview Terrace. 4. That the covenants of Berry Patch be strictly followed for residents over 62 years of age for at least 50 years. We appreciate that Metro Realty has been sensitive to our neighborhood's needs. They have been accommodating to meet with neighbors to address concerns, dispel misconceptions, and resolve differences. By adding more landscaping, three upscale single family homes, and extending the residential zone, we feel this will help reinforce the neighborhood's integrity and property values. They have done an outstanding job alleviating the potential trauma to the Grandview Terrace, Sele Drive, and Deming Street neighborhood. We applaud them for that. We would like to caution the Planning and Zoning Commission to carefully evaluate future explosions of development in South Windsor. Justification and determination of whether our town's community services can support it is necessary. South Windsor has had seen rapid and exponential growth over the past two decades. We hope that the town maintains control over it. Carolyn and Ron Mirek DECLARATION This Declaration made this Lay of A�u.a,Zy, 2004 by CALVARY CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD (the "Declarant"), a Connecticut ecclesiastical corporation with an office at 400 Buckland Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 and The Metro Realty Group, Ltd., a Connecticut corporation with an office at 6 Executive Drive, Farmington, CT 06032. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain property in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, which property is described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); that portion of the Property that is shown on Exhibit B attached hereto shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Lots Property"; and WHEREAS, Declarant has agreed to sell a portion of the Lots Property to The Metro Realty Group, Ltd., or its assignee ("Metro"); and WHEREAS,Metro is proposing to develop forty units of elderly housing on approximately 5.4 acres of the Property(the "Elderly Housing Property"), which Elderly Housing Property is shown on Exhibit C attached hereto, and in order to address concerns of neighbors on Grandview Terrace has agreed to purchase a portion of the Lots Property and cause Declarant to restrict the development of the Lots Property to three single family homes, and WHEREAS, applications to change the zone of a portion of the Lots Property and to subdivide the Lots Property into three (3) lots will be filed with the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby declare and establish that: 1. Each of the three lots comprising the Lots Property shall be developed and occupied as a single family residence and for no other purpose. 2. This Declaration shall be void in the event that: a. subdivision approval to subdivide the Lots Property into three (3) lots, and the related zone change for a portion of the Lots Property, are not obtained, beyond all appeal periods, from the South Windsor Planning and Zoning C:,.....7,�-:;�;;:., �: -. '.,:; ... .;-:J 1, 2004, -1 b. special permit approval is not granted, beyond all appeal periods, by the Town of South Windsor for Metro's proposed elderly housing development on the 5.4 acres of adjacent land on or before July 1. 2004, or I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A TRUE Copy OF THE DOCUMENT RECORDED IN THE SOUTH fflJ;,,%6A4JND RECORDS DATED \\Caplan\Documents\Public\PSorokin\Metro\Berry Patch II\Calvary Church\Decla L ,01/13/043:13 PM DA ° CT.THIS OF TOWN CLERK C. a building permit is not issued, beyond all appeal periods, by the Town of South Windsor for Metro's proposed elderly housing development on the 5.4 acres of adjacent land on or before July 1, 2005. 3. In the event that the special permit referred to in paragraph 2(b) above and the building permit referred to in paragraph 2(c) above are obtained within the time periods set forth therein, but the subdivision approval and zone change referred to in paragraph 2(a) above are not obtained within the time period set forth therein, then the Elderly Housing Property will not be developed as elderly housing, notwithstanding the granting of the special permit and building permit therefor. 4. Unless sooner void pursuant to paragraph 2 above, this Declaration shall remain in effect for fifty(50) years from the date hereof. 5. This Declaration shall run with the land that constitutes the Property and may be enforced by the Town of South Windsor and by any single family home owner on Grandview Terrace, South Windsor, Ct. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant and The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. have hereby executed this Declaration as of the day and year first above written. Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God Y: VJ" R-v `"— B Pastd Kenneth Gustafson Its President n� i32c> AJrtL� c y Theodore Sakelarakis Its Corporate Secretary The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. Geoffrey a Its President \\Caplan\Documents\Public\PSorokin\Metro\Berry Patch II\Calvary Church\Declaration(costs)2.doc O1/13/043:13 PM 1. STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) ss: ►,� A NLc ,S�2 �-�,� I��z�� y COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared the said Pastor Kenneth L. Gustafson, President of said Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said church, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court STATE OF CONNECTICUT)) SS: f—A4Cq?. rrr 11`J ,emu t^8 (3 ��-c4�^'� COUNTY OF HARTFORL j Personally appeared the said Theodore Sakelarakis, Corporate Secretary of said Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said church, before me. C r- Commissioner oft e Superior Court STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) ss: COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared the said Geoffrey W. Sager, President of said The Metro Realty Group, Ltd., signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me. Commissioner t e Superior Court Pdftmy Pubki;-- �y-rT-cviituii�.i'�" �vr�irac• \\Caplan\Documents\Public\PSorokin\Metro\Berry Patch 11\Calvary Church\Declaration(costs)?.doc O1/13/043:13 PM Jan 12 04 12: 36p Design Professiols 860-291 -8757 p. 2 jig Y f ^'o I RRAC£ C it o h v ZIgIHxa ti . -Jan 12 04 12: 3Gp Design Professiols 860-291-8757 p, 3 EXHIBIT B �a� �g / strz9•,rw 7 � O g 3' fly � JR�. Z I � u� / a JJf/� u / s 3 7S7 1i17Z9'fTE .� o E � � w 5 j �,as N 13J.od MAP s .� GRAND V EW TERRACE VO RECEIVED FOR RECORD: 1ATE ' -c TIME I • IS Q M. 6 `IN CLERK, SOUTH WINDroOR, OT S76'28'10"E 330.59' S76'17'19"E _ S76'28' "E 76'28'10"E _ to \ a co \ I cr) FF, (D co p0 a 41 I H \ e FF: o GRE O Pa \ p ` H n N 7i \ pia �yW U]I OJ r 0 \ S) L \ o CL \2 y k \ 0 IA \ vn N 2 ar'°a.s� AREA l 5 2$ A .T� L� �,PN�'�Ag�IEHs Y vI fU leap N73'41'07"W 4 .3 ' Avi R 160.0.1 0 c 0 M � I T �et�r ro.ai.nm W pa^A��^ ^.mac ..... I V . t . S. ot 'aaslo�l�, Inc. der o arsrno Rs,�Lrr 1 .=A Ia aR imvnw +r a.�e, .....rro«..s�..w..m .va,eau , 1 +w.i.rtv.nc trr-b�etpo �*t�o�t. aacnavnav� R.F. Hagearty & Associates, Inc. Real Estate Analysis, Consulting and Valuation 92 Connecticut Boulevard Tel. (860) 282-0851 P.O. Box 280125 Fax (860) 282-9522 East Hartford, CT 06128-0125 Sean T. Hagearty, MAI Presentation to South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission January 13, 2004 SELECTED CRITERIA IMPACT ANALYSIS: INTRODUCTION At the request of Mr. Geoffrey Sager of Berry Patch II Associates Limited Partnership, I have investigated the following issues concerning the proposed expansion of the Berry Patch elderly apartment complex: ■ To what extent might the proposed expansion of the Berry Patch elderly apartment complex have an impact upon the demographic profile for the town of South Windsor and how those changes relate to county and/or statewide demographic trends ■ What is the likely fiscal impact to the town with respect to real estate tax revenues to be generated by the project and how do those revenues compare to those generated by similar projects at other locations in central Connecticut SCOPE OF WORK: DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS For the demographic analysis, the following steps were performed: ■ Reviewed a wide variety of available demographic information to include databases maintained by the State of Connecticut and the United States Census Bureau ■ Reviewed a demographic profile and projection for the years 2003-2008 prepared by ESRI Business Information Solutions, which was provided by Mr. Sager ■ Based on the demographic information reviewed, and using the profile of tenants at other elderly proj ects developed by Metro Realty, a projection was made as to a demographic impact that may result from the existing project and proposed expansion R.R Hagearty & Associates, Inc. Real Estate Analysis, Consulting and Valuation 92 Connecticut Boulevard Tel. (860) 282-0851 P.O. Box 280125 Fax (860) 282-9522 East Hartford,CT 06128-0125 DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT ANALYSIS: SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ■ Per the U.S. Census Bureau, the total population in South Windsor as of 2000 was 24,412 persons. Of this total, 2,900 persons or 11.90% of the population was aged 65 years or older. On a comparative basis, the 65-year plus population is 14.7% of the total Hartford County population and 13.8% of the total statewide population. In other words, South Windsor is a little "younger"than either Hartford County or the state of Connecticut as a whole. ■ By 2003, per ESRI, the total population in South Windsor was projected to have grown to 24,786 persons with 3,061 or 12.3% aged 65 years or older. By 2008, the figures are expected to be 25,331 total population and 3,351 aged 65 years and up, some 13.2% of the total. Therefore, while South Windsor is aging in a similar fashion to the county and state, its 65 plus demographic will still be a smaller percentage than that for the county or state. ■ While South Windsor's population is aging, its growth rate over the coming 5 years will still place its projected 65-plus population at a lower percentage of the County and State averages as of 2000. ■ Assuming a worst case scenario, if about 2/3 of the new units created or proposed by Metro (270 total - 72 at Watson Farm and 198 for Berry Patch I& II) are in fact rented by households that relocate into South Windsor, the total population increase attributable to same is about 234 persons (270 units x 1.3 avg persons per unit x 2/3 capture rate), less than 1% of the current population. ■ At less than 1% of current population, and an ever smaller percentage of the projected 2008 population, it is hard to imagine that the specific group of"imported" elderly persons could have any detrimental impact upon town services or programs. ■ The statistics are even more compelling when the household population figures are reviewed. Per U.S. Census Bureau figures, South Windsor contained 1,954 households with an individual aged 65 years or older in 2000, some 8% of the total population. This is much lower than the Hartford County and statewide figures of 10% and 9.60%, respectively. For single individual householders aged 65 years and older, South Windsor's figure is 613 or 6.88% of the total households while the corresponding figures are 10.69% and 10.15% for Hartford County and the state overall. This last category is important because it is a dominant renter of elderly units. V R.F. Hagearty & Associates, Inc. Real Estate Analysis, Consulting and Valuation 92 Connecticut Boulevard Tel. (860) 282-0851 P.O. Box 280125 Fax (860) 282-9522 East Hartford,CT 06128-0125 SCOPE OF WORK: TAX REVENUE ANALYSIS For the tax revenue analysis, the following steps were performed: ■ Reviewed the existing assessment and tax information for the developer's first completed project in town, Watson Farm ■ Reviewed current assessments and tax burdens at other recently completed elderly and affordable apartment complexes throughout the central Connecticut area. ■ Prepared a compilation or summary table of the above data TAX REVENUE IMPACT ANALYSIS: SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ■ Based upon the current assessment and tax burden for Watson Farm, the units at the Berry Patch elderly complex should produce tax revenues of at least $1,050 per unit. ■ The Watson Farms complex is generating a higher annual tax revenue per unit than any of the other projects surveyed except for one. Fact Sheet- American FactFinder Page 1,of 2 m-11 rtt� i FACT SHEET ......... ..._...._.._a....._......._..__..._ __._. _ .. .___.. ., _ ___ . South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut Highlights from the Census 2000 Demographic Profiles: General Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. Total population 24,412 100.0 100% map brief Male 11,762 48.2 49.1% map brief Female 12,650 51.8 50.9% map brief Median Age(years) 39.0 (X) 35.3 map brief Under 5 years 1,540 6.3 6.8% map 18 years and over 17,735 72.6 74.3% 65 years and over 2,900 11.9 12.4% map brief One race-Total 24,177 99.0 97.6% White 22,336 91.5 75.1% map brief Black or African American 721 3.0 12.3% map brief American Indian and Alaska Native 45 0.2 0.9% map brief Asian 905 3.7 3.6% map brief Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 8 0.0 0.1% map brief Some other race 162 0.7 5.5% map Two or more races 235 1.0 2.4% map brief Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 554 2.3 12.5% map brief Average household size 2.72 (X) 2.59 map brief Average family size 3.16 (X) 3.14 map Total housing units 9,071 100.0 100.0% map Occupied housing units 8,905 98.2 91.0% brief Owner-occupied housing units 7,953 89.3 66.2% map Renter-occupied housing units 952 10.7 33.8% map brief Vacant housing units 166 1.8 9.0% map Social Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. Population 25 years and over 16,538 100.0 High school graduate or higher 3,776 91.4 80.4% map brief Bachelor's degree or higher 4,209 41.6 24.4% map Civilian veterans(civilian population 25 years and older) 2,208 12.4 12.7% map brief Disability Status(population 21 to 64 years) 1,800 12.6 19.2% map brief Foreign Born 2,417 9.9 11.1% map brief Now Married(population 15 years and over) 11,949 63.3 54.4% Speak a language other than English at home(5 years and older) 3,108 13.6 17.9% map brief Economic Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. In Labor Force(16 years and older) 13,497 72.9 63.9% brief Mean travel time to work in minutes(16 years and older) 22.5 (X) 25.5 map Median household income(dollars) 73,990 (X) 41,994 map Median family income(dollars) 82,807 (X) 50,046 map Per capita income(dollars) 30,966 (X) 21,857 map Families below poverty level 100 1.5 9.2% map brief Individuals below poverty level 437 1.8 12.4% map Housing Characteristics -show more>> Number Percent U.S. Single-family owner-occupied homes 7,042 100.0 Median value(dollars) 167,500 (X) 119,600 map brief Median of selected monthly owner costs , (X) (X) With a mortgage 1490 W 1,088 map Not mortgaged 510 (X) 295 Fact Sheet - American FactFinder Page 1 of 2 Census Bureau � .; FACT SHEET ..........._...___._........-.......__......-_____....._._....... _.._ Connecticut Highlights from the Census 2000 Demographic Profiles: General Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. Total population 3,405,565 100.0 100% map brief Male 1,649,319 48.4 49.1% map brief Female 1,756,246 51.6 50.9% map brief Median Age(years) 37.4 (X) 35.3 map brief Under 5 years 223,344 6.6 6.8% map 18 years and over 2,563,877 75.3 74.3% 65 years and over 470,183 13.8 12.4% map brief One race-Total 3,330,717 97.8 97.6% White 2,780,355 81.6 75.1% map brief Black or African American 309,843 9.1 12.3% map brief American Indian and Alaska Native 9,639 0.3 0.9% map brief Asian 82,313 2.4 3.6% map brief Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1,366 0.0 0.1% map brief Some other race 147,201 4.3 5.5% map Two or more races 74,848 2.2 2.4% map brief Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 320,323 9.4 12.5% map brief Average household size 2.53 (X) 2.59 map brief Average family size 3.08 (X) 3.14 map Total housing units 1,385,975 100.0 100.0% map Occupied housing units 1,301,670 93.9 91.0% brief Owner-occupied housing units 869,729 66.8 66.2% map Renter-occupied housing units 431,941 33.2 33.8% map brief Vacant housing units 84,305 6.1 9.0% map Social Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. Population 25 years and over 2,295,617 100.0 High school graduate or higher 653,300 84.0 80.4% map brief Bachelor's degree or higher 416,751 31.4 24.4% map Civilian veterans (civilian population 25 years and older) 310,069 12.1 12.7% map brief Disability Status(population 21 to 64 years) 327,697 16.8 19.2% map brief Foreign Born 369,967 10.9 11.1% ma brief Now Married p (population 15 years and over) 1,483,688 55.0 54.4% Speak a language other than English at home(5 years and older) 583,913 18.3 17.9% map brief Economic Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. In Labor Force(16 years and older) 1,765,319 66.6 63.9% brief Mean travel time to work in minutes(16 years and older) 24.4 (X) 25.5 map Median household income(dollars) 53,935 (X) 41,994 map Median family income(dollars) 65,521 (X) 50,046 map Per capita income(dollars) 28,766 (X) 21,857 map Families below poverty level 49,983 5.6 9.2% map brief Individuals below poverty level 259,514 7.9 12.4% map Housing Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S Single-family owner-occupied homes 728,244 100.0 Median value(dollars) 166,900 (X) 119,600 map brief Median of selected monthly owner costs (X) (X) With a mortgage 1,426 (X) 1,088 map Not mortgaged 473 (X) 295 Fact Sheet-American FactFinder Page 1 of 2 y3 f r' g � • FACT SHEET Hartford County, Connecticut Highlights from the Census 2000 Demographic Profiles: General Characteristics-show more>> Number Percent U.S. Total population Male 857,183 100.0 100% map brief Female 412,276 48.1 49.1% map brief Median Age(years) 444,907 51.9 50.9% map brief Under 5 years 37.7 (X) 35.3 map brief 18 years and over 54,783 6.4 6.8% map 65 years and over 646,351 75.4 74.3% 125,628 14.7 12.4% map brief One race-Total White 837,384 97.7 97.6% 659,192 76.9 75.1% map brief Black or African American % map brief . 11.7 123 American Indian and Alaska Native 1,9 99,936 36 0.2 . % map brief Asian 20,775 2.4 3.6% map brief Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 370 0.0 0.1% map brief Some other race Two or more races 55,127 ,127 2.3 6.4 5.5% map Hispanic or Latino(of any race) 2.4% map brief Average household size 98,968 11.5 12.5% map brief Average family size 2.48 (X) 2.59 map brief Total housing units 3.05 (X) 3.14 map Occupied housing units 353,022 100.0 100.0% map Owner-occupied housing units 335,098 94.9 91.0% brief Renter-occupied housing units 215,275 64.2 66.2% map Vacant housing units 119,823 35.8 33.8% map brief 17,924 5.1 9.0% map Social Characteristics-show more.>> Population 25 years and over Number Percent U.S. High school graduate or higher 579,839 100.0 Bachelor's degree or higher 1 ,8 .4 24.4% map brief 101 Civilian veterans(civilian population 25 years and ,865 29.6 .4% map older) 77,095 11.9 12.7% map brief Disability Status(population 21 to 64 years) 87,081 18.0 19.2% map brief Foreign Born 100,693 11.7 11.1% map brief Now Married(population 15 years and over) 363,071 53.4 54.4% Speak a language other than English at home(5 years and older) 174,189 21.7 17.9% map brief Economic Characteristics-show more>> In Labor Force(16 years and older) Number Percent U.S. 438,197 65.5 63.9% brief Mean travel time to work in minutes(16 years and older) 21.9 (X) 25.5 map Median household income(dollars) Median family income(dollars) 62,144 (X) 40,046 map Per capita income(dollars) 26,044 (X) 21,857 map Families below poverty level 15,780 .1 2 9.2% map Individuals below poverty level 75,440 9.1 2.2% map brief 77,440 9.3 12.4% map Housing Characteristics-show more>> Single-family owner-occupied homes Number Percent U.S. Median value(dollars) 185,016 100.0 147,300 (X) 119,600 map brief Median of selected monthly owner costs With a mortgage (X) (X) Not mortgaged 1,351 (X) 1,088 map 454 (X) 295 I i Table DPA. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut [For information on confidentiality protection,nonsampling error,and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total population.......................... 24,412 100.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population.......................... 24,412 100.0 SEX AND AGE Hispanic or Latino(of any race)................ 554 2.3 Male........................................ 11,762 48.2 Mexican................................... 55 0.2 Female...................................... 12,650 51.8 Puerto Rican............................... 250 1.0 Under years ............................... 1,540 6.3 Cuban .................................... 22 0.1 5to 9 years ................................. 2,022 8.3 Other Hispanic or Latino .................... 227 0.9 10 to 14 years............................... 2,034 8.3 Not Hispanic or Latino........................ 23,858 97.7 15to 19 years............................... 1,516 6.2 White alone................................ 21,987 90.1 20 to 24 years ............................... 789 3.2 RELATIONSHIP 25to 34 years............................... 2,466 10.1 Total population.......................... 24,412 100.0 35to 44 years............................... 4,794 19.6 In households................................ 24,211 99.2 45 to 54 years ............................... 3,997 16.4 Householder............................... 8,905 36.5 55to 59 years............................... 1,370 5.6 Spouse ................................... 5,847 24.0 60to 64 years............................... 984 4.0 Child...................................... 7,958 32.6 65 to 74 years............................... 1,698 7.0 Own child under 18 years................ 6,401 26.2 75to 84 years............................... 894 3.7 Other relatives............................. 816 3.3 85 years and over............................ 308 1.3 Under 18 years......................... 214 0.9 Median age(years)........................... 39.0 (X) Nonrelatives............................... 685 2.8 Unmarried partner....................... 321 1.3 18 years and over............................ 17,735 72.6 In group quarters............................. 201 0.8 Male...................................... 8,335 34.1 Institutionalized population................... 194 0.8 Female.................................... 9,400 38.5 Noninstitutionalized population............... 7 - 21 years and over........................:... 17,111 70.1 62 years and over............................ 3,473 14.2 HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE 65 years and over............................ 2,900 11.9 Total households.......................... 8,905 100.0 Male...................................... 1,209 5.0 Family households(families)................... 6,768 76.0 Female.................................... 1,691 6.9 With own children under 18 years.......... 3,427 38.5 Married-couple family....................... 5,847 65.7 RACE With own children under 18 years.......... 2,950 33.1 One race.................................... 24,177 99.0 Female householder,no husband present..... 670 7.5 White..................................... 22,336 91.5 With own children under 18 years.......... 356 4.0 Black or African American................... 721 3.0 Nonfamily households ........................ 2,137 24.0 American Indian and Alaska Native........... 45 0.2 Householder living alone.................... 1,762 19.8 Asian ..................................... 905 3.7 Householder 65 years and over............ 613 6.9 Asian Indian............................. 287 1.2 Chinese................................. 174 0.7 Households with individuals under 18 years..... 3,581 40.2 Filipino.................................. 61 0.2 Households with individuals 65 years and over .. 1,954 21.9 Japanese................................ 6 - Average household size....................... 2.72 (X) Korean.................................. 144 0.6 Average family size........................... 3.16 (X) Vietnamese.............................. 133 0.5 Other Asian' ............................ 100 0.4 HOUSING OCCUPANCY Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.... 8 _ Total housing units....................... 9,071 100.0 Native Hawaiian.......................... 4 Occupied housing units....................... 8,905 98.2 Guamanian or Chamorro.................. 3 Samoan..... Vacant housing units.......................... 166 1.8 ..... _ Other Pacific Islander'2 ........ For seasonal,recreational,or "' occasional use............................ 28 0.3 Some other race........................... 162 0.7 Two or more races ........................... 235 1.0 Homeowner vacancy rate(percent)............. 0.5 (X) Race alone or in combination with one Rental vacancy rate(percent).................. 4.1 (X) or more other races:' HOUSING TENURE White....................................... 22,530 92.3 Occupied housing units.................. 8,905 100.0 Black or African American..................... 788 3.2 Owner-occupied housing units................. 7,953 89.3 American Indian and Alaska Native............. 87 0.4 Asian ....................................... 1,014 4.2 Renter-occupied housing units................. 952 10.7 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander...... 14 0.1 Average household size of owner-occupied units. 2.79 (X) Some other race............................. 233 1.0 Average household size of renter-occupied units. 2.11 (X) Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X)Not applicable. Other Asian alone,or two or more Asian categories. 2 Other Pacific Islander alone,or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more of the other races listed.The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2000. 1 U.S.Census Bureau Table DP•2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut [Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection,sampling error,nonsampling error,and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent SCHOOL ENROLLMENT NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH Population 3 years and over Total population.......................... 24,471 100.0 enrolled in school.................... 7,069 100.0 Native....................................... 22,054 90.1 Nursery school,preschool..................... 656 9.3 Born in United States....................... 21,851 89.3 Kindergarten................................. 243 3.4 State of residence........................ 15,364 62.8 Elementary school(grades 1-8)................ 3,324 47.0 Different state............................ 6,487 26.5 High school(grades 9-12)..................... 1,516 21.4 Bom outside United States.................. 203 0.8 College or graduate school.................... 1,330 18.8 Foreign born................................. 2,417 9.9 Entered 1990 to March 2000 .............. 655 2.7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Naturalized citizen.......................... 1,547 6.3 Population 25 years and over.......... 16,538 100.0 Not a citizen............................... 870 3.6 Less than 9th grade .......................... 609 3.7 9th to 12th grade,no diploma.................. 817 4.9 REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN 9 9 ( equivalency) •••• 3,776 22.8 Total(excluding born at sea.............. 2,417 100.0 High school graduate includes a uivalenc ) Some college,no degree...................... 3,323 20.1 Europe..:................................... 884 36.6 Associate degree............................. 1,137 6.9 Asia ........................................ 656 27.1 Bachelor's degree............................ 4,209 25.5 Africa....................................... 94 3.9 Graduate or professional degree............... 2,667 16.1 Oceania..................................... 8 0.3 Latin America................................ 380 15.7 Percent high school graduate or higher......... 91.4 (X) Northern America............................. 395 16.3 Percent bachelor's degree or higher............ 41.6 (X) LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME MARITAL STATUS Population 5 years and over.............. 22,909 100.0 Population 15 years and over.......... 18,870 100.0 English only................................. 19,801 86.4 Never married ............................... 4,070 21.6 Language other than English .................. 3,108 13.6 Now married,except separated................ 11,949 63.3 Speak English less than"very well"........ 951 4.2 Separated................................... 96 0.5 Spanish................................... 578 2.5 Widowed.................................... 1,232 6.5 Speak English less than"very well" ........ 177 0.8 Female.................................... 983 5.2 Other Indo-European languages ............. 1,852 8.1 Divorced .................................... 1,523 8.1 Speak English less than"very well" ........ 489 2.1 Female.................................... 980 5.2 Asian and Pacific Island languages........... 569 2.5 Speak English less than"very well" ........ 269 1.2 GRANDPARENTS AS CAREGIVERS ANCESTRY(single or multiple) Grandparent living in household with one or more own grandchildren under Total population......................... 24471 100.0 18 years............................. 395 100.0 Total ancestries reported................... 31,382 128.2 Grandparent responsible for grandchildren ...... 70 17.7 Arab........................................ 54 0.2 Czech'...................................... 59 0.2 VETERAN STATUS Danish...................................... 138 0.6 Civilian population 18 years and over.. 17,775 100'0 Dutch....................................... 375 1.5 Civilian veterans ............................. 2,208 12.4 English...................................... 2,992 12.2 French(except Basque)'...................... 2,464 10.1 DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIAN French Canadian'............................ 1,768 7.2 NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION German..................................... 2,620 10.7 ........ Population 5 to 20 years............... 5,773 100.0 Greek....................................... 248 1.0 With a disability.............................. 356 6.2 Hungarian................................... 189 0.8 Irish'........................................ 5,138 21.0 Population 21 to 64 years.............. 14,234 100.0 Italian....................................... 4,536 18.5 With a disability.............................. 1,800 12.6 Lithuanian................................... 413 1.7 Percent employed.......................... 75.3 (X) Norwegian................................... 77 0.3 No disability................................. 12,434 87.4 Polish....................................... 2,445 10.0 Percent employed.......................... 84.8 (X) Portuguese.................................. 301 1.2 Population 65 years and over.......... 2,694 100.0 Russian..................................... 481 2.0 With a disability.............................. 897 33.3 Scotch-Irish.................................. 286 1.2 Scottish..................................... 561 2.3 RESIDENCE IN 1995 Slovak...................................... 52 0.2 Population 5 years and over........... 22,909 100.0 Subsaharan African........................... 167 0.7 Same house in 1995.......................... 15,369 67.1 Swedish..................................... 705 2.9 Different house in the U.S.in 1995............. 7,217 31.5 Swiss....................................... 99 0.4 Same county .............................. 4,961 21.7 Ukrainian.................................... 295 1.2 Different county............................ 2,256 9.8 United States orAmerican..................... 992 4.1 Same state.............................. 1,051 4.6 Welsh....................................... 130 0.5 Different state............................ 1,205 5.3 West Indian(excluding Hispanic groups)........ 234 1.0 Elsewhere in 1995............................1 323 1.4 Other ancestries ............................. 3,563 14.6 -Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X)Not applicable. 'The data represent a combination of two ancestries shown separately in Summary File 3.Czech includes Czechoslovakian. French includes Alsa- tian. French Canadian includes Acadian/Cajun. Irish includes Celtic. Source: U.S.Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. 2 U.S.Census Bureau � 4 Table DP-3. Profile of Selected.Economic Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut [Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error,and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent EMPLOYMENT STATUS INCOME IN 1999 Population 16 years and over............ 18,510 100.0 Households............................. 8,940 100.0 In labor force ................................ 13,497 72.9 Less than$10,000............................ 134 1.5 Civilian labor force.......................... 13,483 72.8 $10,000 to$14,999........................... 250 2.8 Employed ............................... 13,130 70.9 $15,000to$24,999........................... 464 5.2 Unemployed............................. 353 1.9 $25,000to$34,999........................... 594 6.6 Percent of civilian labor force............ 2.6 (X) $35,000 to$49,999........................... 1,030 11.5 Armed Forces.............................. 14 0.1 $50,000to$74,999........................... 2,076 23.2 Not in labor force............................. 5,013 27.1 $75,000 to$99,999........................... 1,874 21.0 Females 16 years and over.............. 9,785 100.0 $100,000 to$149,999......................... 1,581 17.7 In labor force ................................ 6,531 66.7 $150,000to$199,999......................... 552 6.2 Civilian labor force.......................... 6,531 66.7 $200,000 or more............................ 385 4.3 X Median household income(dollars)............. 73,990 Employed ............................... 6,371 65.1 ( ) Own children under 6 years.............. 1,854 100.0 With earnings................................ 7,795 87.2 All parents in family in labor force.............. 1,362 73.5 Mean earnings(dollars)' .................... 82,525 (X) With Social Security income................... 2,100 23.5 COMMUTING TO WORK Mean Social Security income(dollars)' ....... 12,856 (X) Workers 16 years and over.............. 13,053 100.0 With Supplemental Security Income............ 148 1.7 Car,truck,or van--drove alone............... 11,528 88.3 Mean Supplemental Security Income Car,truck,or van--carpooled................. 894 6.8 (dollars)'................................. 7,851 (X) Public transportation(including taxicab)......... 164 1.3 With public assistance income................. 102 1.1 Walked...................................... 59 0.5 Mean public assistance income(dollars)' ..... 4,005 (X) Other means................................. 69 0.5 With retirement income ....................... 1,770 19.8 Worked at home ............................. 339 2.6 Mean retirement income(dollars)'............ 17,926 (X) Mean travel time to work(minutes)' ............ 22.5 (X) Families................................ 6,808 100.0 Employed civilian population Less than$10,000............................ 87 1.3 16 years and over..................... 13,130 100.0 $10,000to$14,999........................... 35 0.5 OCCUPATION $15,000 to$24,999........................... 126 1.9 Management,professional,and related $25,000 to$34,999........................... 376 5.5 occupations ................................ 6,344 48.3 $35,000to$49,999........................... 660 9.7 Service occupations .......................... 1,249 9.5 $50,000to$74,999........................... 1,599 23.5 Sales and office occupations .................. 3,739 28.5 $75,000 to$99,999........................... 1,613 23.7 Farming,fishing,and forestry occupations....... 11 0.1 $100,000 to$149,999......................... 1,467 21.5 Construction, extraction,and maintenance $150,000 to$199,999......................... 494 7.3 occupations ................................ 796 6.1 $200,000 or more............................ 351 5.2 Production,transportation,and material moving Median family income(dollars)................. 82,807 (X) occupations ................................ 991 7.5 Per capita income(dollars)' ................... 30,966 (X) INDUSTRY Median earnings(dollars): Agriculture,forestry,fishing and hunting, Male full-time,year-round workers.............. 55,703 (X) and mining................................. 49 0.4 Female full-time,year-round workers ........... 38,665 (X) Construction................................. 707 5.4 Manufacturing................................ 1,701 13.0 Number Percent Wholesale trade.............................. 546 4.2 below below Retail trade.................................. 1,431 10.9 poverty poverty Transportation and warehousing,and utilities.... 422 3.2 Subject level level Information .................................. 291 2.2 Finance,insurance, real estate,and rental and POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 leasing nal, s....scientific, management, ...,admi.s- 2,563 19.5 Families................................ 100 1.5 Professional, scientific,management,adminis- With related children under 18 years............ 42 1.2 trative,and waste management services....... 1,117 8.5 With related children under 5 years........... 21 1.8 Educational, health and social services ......... 2,675 20.4 Arts,entertainment, recreation,accommodation Families with female householder,no and food services........................... 510 3.9 husband present....................... 24 3.4 Other services(except public administration) .... 490 3.7 With related children under 18 years............ 7 2.0 Public administration.......................... 628 4.8 With related children under 5 years........... - - CLASS OF WORKER Individuals.............................. 437 1.8 Private wage and salary workers............... 10,314 78.6 18 years and over............................ 385 2.2 Government workers.......................... 1,913 14.6 65 years and over.......................... 123 4.6 Self-employed workers in own not incorporated Related children under 18 years ............... 52 0.8 business................................... 855 6.5 Related children 5 to 17 years............... 34 0.7 Unpaid family workers ........................ 48 0.4 Unrelated individuals 15 years and over......... 172 6.3 -Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X)Not applicable. 'If the denominator of a mean value or per capita value is less than 30,then that value is calculated using a rounded aggregate in the numerator. See text. Source: U.S.Bureau of the Census,Census 2000. 3 U.S.Census Bureau Table DP-4. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: South Windsor town, Hartford County, Connecticut [Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection,sampling error,nonsampling error,and definitions,see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total housing units.................... 9,080 100.0 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM UNITS IN STRUCTURE Occupied housing units............... 8,908 100.0 1-unit,detached.............................. 6,874 75.7 1.00 orless.................................. 8,832 99.1 1-unit,attached .............................. 802 8.8 1.01 to 1.50 ................................. 53 0.6 2 units...................................... 145 1.6 1.51 or more................................. 23 0.3 3 or units.................................. 197 2.2 5 to 9 units.................................. 541 6.0 Specified owner-occupied units........ 7,042 100.0 10 to 19 units................................ 240 2.6 VALUE 20 or more units ............................. 151 1.7 Less than$50,000............................ 32 0.5 Mobile home................................. 130 1.4 $50,000 to$99,999........................... 415 5.9 Boat, RV,van,etc............................ - $100,000to$149,999......................... 2,055 29.2 $150,000to$199,999......................... 2,253 32.0 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT $200,000 to$299,999......................... 1,807 25.7 1999 to March 2000.......................... 210 2.3 $300,000to$499,999......................... 465 6.6 1995 to 1998 ................................ 437 4.8 $500,000to$999,999......................... 15 0.2 1990 to 1994 ................................ 630 6.9 $1,000,000 or more........................... - - 1980 to 1989 ................................ 2,755 30.3 Median(dollars).............................. 167,500 (X) 1970 to 1979 ................................ 1,295 14.3 1960 to 1969 ................................ 1,454 16.0 MORTGAGE STATUS AND SELECTED 1940 to 1959 ................................ 1,720 18.9 MONTHLY OWNER COSTS 1939 or earlier............................... 579 6.4 With a mortgage ............................. 5,378 76.4 Less than$300 .......................... - - ROOMS $300 to$499 ............................ 18 0.3 1 room...................................... 33 0.4 $500to$699 ............................ 125 1.8 2 rooms..................................... 143 1.6 $700to$999 ............................ 532 7.6 3 rooms..................................... 367 4.0 $1,000to$1,499......................... 2,067 29.4 4 rooms..................................... 688 7.6 $1,500to$1,999......................... 1,612 22.9 5 rooms..................................... 1,486 16.4 $2,000 or more .......................... 1,024 14.5 6 rooms..................................... 1,845 20.3 Median(dollars).......................... 1,490 (X) 7 rooms..................................... 1,754 19.3 Not mortgaged............................... 1,664 23.6 8 rooms..................................... 1,526 16.8 Median(dollars).......................... 506 (X) 9 or more rooms ............................. 1,238 13.6 Median(rooms).............................. 6.5 (X) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD Occupied housing units............... 8,908 100.0 INCOME IN 1999 YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Less than 15.0 percent........................ 2,013 28.6 1999 to March 2000.......................... 1,005 11.3 15.0 to 19.9 percent.......................... 1,442 20.5 1995 to 1998 ................................ 2,217 24.9 20.0 to 24.9 percent.......................... 1,184 16.8 1990to 1994 ................................ 1,615 18.1 25.0 to 29.9 percent.......................... 971 13.8 1980 to 1989 ................................ 1,898 21.3 30.0 to 34.9 percent.......................... 518 7.4 1970 to 1979 ................................ 887 10.0 35.0 percent or more ......................... 901 12.8 1969 or earlier............................... 1,286 14.4 Not computed................................ 13 0.2 VEHICLES AVAILABLE Specified renter-occupied units........ 950 100.0 None ....................................... 204 2.3 GROSS RENT 1 ........................................... 2,126 23.9 Less than$200 .............................. 19 2.0 2........................................... 4,701 52.8 $200 to$299 ................................ 35 3.7 3 or more ................................... 1,877 21.1 $300 to$499 ................................ 56 5.9 $500to$749 ................................ 200 21.1 HOUSE HEATING FUEL $750 to$999 ................................ 306 32.2 Utility gas ................................... 3,695 41.5 $1,000 to$1,499............................. 254 26.7 Bottled,tank,or LP gas....................... 106 1.2 $1,500 or more .............................. 36 3.8 Electricity.................................... 1,109 12.4 No cash rent................................. 44 4.6 Fuel oil,kerosene,etc ........................ 3,945 44.3 Median(dollars)............................... 844 (X) Coal or coke................................. - - Wood....................................... 53 0.6 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF Solar energy................................. - - HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 Other fuel ................................... - Less than 15.0 percent........................ 248 26.1 No fuel used................................. - - 15.0 to 19.9 percent.......................... 159 16.7 20.0to 24.9 percent.......................... 136 14.3 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS 25.0 to 29.9 percent.......................... 126 13.3 Lacking complete plumbing facilities............ 31 0.3 30.0 to 34.9 percent.......................... 53 5.6 Lacking complete kitchen facilities.............. 67 0.8 35.0 percent or more ......................... 159 16.7 No telephone service ......................... 22 0.2 Not computed................................ 69 7.3 -Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X)Not applicable. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census,Census 2000. 4 U.S.Census Bureau Business Age 55+ Profile Information Solutions IFTEN ZIP:06074 South Windsor,CT Census 2000 2003 2008 2003-2008 2003-2008 Change Annual Rate Total Population 24,412 24,786 25,331 545 0.44% Population 55+ 5,254 5,793 6,687 894 2.91% Median Age 39.0 40.6 42.7 2.1 1.01% Households 8,905 9,106 9,455 349 0.76% %Householders 55+ 33.7 36.4 40.9 4.5 2.36% Owner/Renter Ratio 8.4 8.5 8.6 0.1 0.23% Population by Age and Sex Male Population Census 2000 2003 2008 Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Total 2,375 100.0% 2,639 100.0% 3,076 100.0% 55-59 684 28.8% 769 29.1% 926 30.1% 60-64 482 20.3% 572 21.7% 694 22.6% 65-69 437 18.4% 433 16.4% 490 15.9% 70-74 327 13.8% 363 13.8% 366 11.9% 75-79 237 10.0% 253 9.6% 292 9.5% 80-84 128 5.4% 156 5.9% 186 6.0% 85+ 80 3.4% 93 3.5% 122 4.0% Female Population Census 2000 2003 2008 Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Number %of 55+ Total 2,879 100.0% 3,154 100.0% 3,611 100.0% 55-59 686 23.8% 797 25.3% 986 27.3% 60-64 502 17.4% 594 18.8% 730 20.2% 65-69 514 17.9% 492 15.6% 540 15.0% 70-74 420 14.6% 454 14.4% 438 12.1% 75-79 318 11.0% 341 10.8% 382 10.6% 80-84 211 7.3% 234 7.4% 270 7.5% 85+ 228 7.9% 242 7.7% 265 7.3% Total Population Census 2000 2003 2008 Number %of Total Pop Number %of Total Pop Number %of Total Pop Total 5,254 21.5% 5,793 23.4% 6,687 26.4% 55-59 1,370 5.6% 1,566 6.3% 1,912 7.5% 60-64 984 4.0% 1,166 4.7% 1,424 5.6% 65-69 951 3.9% 925 3.7% 1,030 4.1% 70-74 747 3.1% 817 3.3% 804 3.2% 75-79 555 2.3% 594 2.4% 674 2.7% 80-84 339 1.4% 390 1.6% 456 1.8% 85+ 308 1.3% 335 1.4% 387 1.5% 65+ 2,900 11.9% 3,061 12.3% 3,351 13.2% 75+ 1,202 4.9% 1,319 5.3% 1,517 6.0% Data Note:Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source:U.S.Bureau of the Census,2000 Census Population and Housing.ESRI BIS forecasts for 2003 and 2008. ©2003 ESRI BIS Phone:800394-3690-www.esribis.com 1/08/2004 Page 1 of 6 1 THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. Monday, February 02, 2004 RECEIVED Marcia Banach FFB 2 2004 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Berry Patch South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: Enclosed herewith please find the official request to the Secretary of OPM requesting that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan.1998-2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Barry Patch development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area", rather than "Conservation Area." As has been the case in the past, I believe that John Radacsi at OPM will request supporting documentation from the chief elected official and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. I would like to follow up with you to see how we should respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance in that regard. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. f -- Geoffrey W. Sag ,, Presi ent j� It l 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAApartment DevelopmentsMerry Patch MOPM\Transmittal to Marcia Banach ii.doc THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. RECEIVED February 2, 2004 FEB " 2 2004 Matt Galligan RECEIVED TOWN Town of South Windsor N WINOgpR 1540 Sullivan Avenue FEB - 3 2004 South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Berry Patch SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Galligan: Enclosed herewith please find the official request to the Secretary of OPM requesting that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998-2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Berry Patch development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area", rather than "Conservation Area." As has been the case in the past,I believe John Radacsi at OPM will request supporting documentation from the chief elected official and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. I would like to follow up with you to see how we should respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance in that regard. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. Geoffrey W. Sa resident 6 Executive Drive, Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAApartment DevelopmentOerry Patch IAOPM\Matt Galligan-transmittal.doc THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. February 2, 2004 Mr. Bruce Gresczyk Commissioner Department of Agriculture 765 Asylum Avenue Hartford, CT 06195 Re: Berry Patch II Development Address: Oakland Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Census Tract: 4875 Dear Mr. Gresczyk: The undersigned hereby respectfully submits this package to express its intention to apply to the Authority for mortgage financing as part of the resources for the captioned development, seeking a reservation of Federal low-income housing tax credits from the Authority in the year 2004. Introductory and background information on the development and its relevant experience has been included. The purpose of this letter is to officially advise you of our request of the Secretary of OPM that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998 - 2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Barry Patch development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area",rather than "Conservation Area." Thank you for considering our application. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. I i Geoffrey W. §age'r t E t 1 I I 6Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax 4 PAApartment DevelopmentsiBerry Patch II\0PM\Bmce Gresczyk II letter.doc F k THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. February 2, 2004 Mr. John Radacsi The State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1308 Re: Berry Patch Il Development Address: Oakland Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Census Tract: 4872 Dear Mr. Radacsi: The undersigned hereby respectfully submits this package to express its intention to apply to the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority for mortgage financing as part of the resources for the captioned development, seeking a reservation of Federal low income housing tax credits from the Authority in the year 2004. Introductory and background information on the development and its relevant experience has been included. The purpose of this letter is to officially request of the Secretary of OPM that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998-2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Barry Patch development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or"Growth Area", rather than "Conservation Area." Thank you for considering our application. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP,LTD. (=77- V Geoffrey W. ger 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington, CT 06032 860-674-5641 + 860-677-6919 Fax PAApartment Developments Berry Patch IROPM\TRanamittal Letter to John Radacsi II.doc THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. Monday,February 02, 2004 Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Berry Patch South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: Enclosed herewith please find the official request to the Secretary of OPM requesting that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998-2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Barry Patch development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area", rather than "Conservation Area." As has been the case in the past,I believe that John Radacsi at OPM will request supporting documentation from the chief elected official and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. I would like to follow up with you to see how we should respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance in that regard. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. - Geoffrey W. Sagler, Presi ent 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAApartment Development0erry Patch'MOPNATransmlttal to Marcia Banach ii.doc r � THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD 6 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, SUITE 100 FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06032 February 7, 2003 Mr. Mark Ryan The State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1308 Re: Berry Patch II Development Address: Oakland Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Census Tract: 4872 Dear Mr. Ryan: We are the developers of a proposed elderly housing development intended to be financed through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority. The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998 - 2003 Locational Guide Map has designated at least a portion of this area as a "Rural Area". To qualify for CHFA financing, the land would have to be designated as either "Urban Neighborhood Conservation Area," "Urban Growth Area," or"Rural Community Center." The land in question is in the Town of South Windsor and I have enclosed information from Design Professionals, our site engineer, providing more specific information relating to the site. Below is information with more specifics about the proposal. Berry Patch II will be virtually identical to the adjacent "Berry Patch" elderly affordable housing under construction in South Windsor. The Office of Policy and Management processed a similar request from us on the Berry Patch development. The zoning and land use patterns in the vicinity of the proposed development are diverse. The immediate adjacent land uses are an assisted living complex known as The Village at Buckland Court, located to the south and west of the Development. To the east of the proposed development is the 102 unit Berry Patch development. Beyond those two uses, there are two single family housing complexes, one to the north on Farm Brook Lane and one to the south known as Grandview Terrace. There are two parcels of land involved in this proposal. One of the sites is located in the South Windsor "Gateway Zone." The other site borders South Windsor's special Gateway Development Zone that has been approved for major commercial and retail development surrounding Buckland Road. The general area is commonly referred to as South Windsor Center. All zoning and land use approvals are in place. The Town of South Windsor and the South Windsor Housing Authority have been very supportive of our development efforts due to the great need for affordable senior housing in the Town of South Windsor. The Berry Patch proposal was approved after lengthy public hearings in South Windsor. No one spoke in opposition to this proposal. PAApartment DevelopmentsTerry Patch II\OPM\Letter to Mark Ryan Il.doc w BERRY PATCH ADULT HOUSING PROPOSAL The proposed development qualifies as affordable senior housing and is intended to be financed through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority ("CHFA"). We will also be seeking an allocation of low-income housing tax credits from the CHFA. The rents charged for the apartment units will be affordable to persons earning not more than 60% of the Hartford PMSA income levels adjusted on a presumed family size of 1.5 persons for a one bedroom unit and three persons for two bedroom unit. With the exception of 19 market rate units, incomes for the occupants residing at the remaining 75 units is limited to 60% of the Hartford PMSA family income levels adjusted based upon family size. All of the foregoing will be memorialized in a covenant recorded on the land records and will stay in place for at least thirty (30) years. At the outset, I would like to spend a couple of moments defining the senior housing market as we see it. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 94 unit elderly housing development or "Housing for the Elderly" as defined in Section 4.1.11 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations. Metro has been overwhelmed with demand for the senior apartments we are constructing at Bery Patch. The demand is coming from persons average age 75 and above. Approximately 2/3 of this group is single women, approximately 20% is couples and the balance, just over 10% is single men. The reason that the proposed apartments are 80% affordable and not all market rate is that age and income are inversely related, that is to say—the older we get as a population, the less we earn — and at age 75, over 1/2 the population is living on fixed or limited incomes; typically social security and a small pension. An affordable rent is what they can afford to pay. Our goal is to improve the quality of life for seniors, by providing an environment for our residents to live independently longer, age in place, and live with dignity on fixed or limited incomes. Our basic concept is housing for persons 62+ (no children), living in a maintenance free / architectural barrier free environment. The development features single level living (no stairs) with one and two bedrooms with one bath, a kitchen, eating nook and living room. About 1/3 of the units are of the one bedroom variety and 2/3 of the units are of the two-bedroom variety. Our one bedroom unit is approximately 800 square feet, or about 25% bigger than typical senior housing and our two-bedroom unit is 950 square feet. Not more than %2 of the two bedroom units typically utilize the second bedroom as a bedroom; as often as not this second bedroom is utilized as a sewing room, guest room, study, family room, or just an additional room. Some features are as follows: • There will be an on-site community room of approximately 2,000 sf, reducing the need of our residents to use the South Windsor Community Center. • Units are pre-leased well before completion,which is extremely rare for apartment rentals. • Unit turn-over is about 2-5%per year versus 30—60% in other apartment complexes. 3 BERRY PATCH ADULT HOUSING PROPOSAL • We expect that within 10 years, the population would age in place and would average 80 years of age. • If you look at the incomes of the 75+ population, 2/3 fall within the affordable income guidelines. • The affordable units that we construct will be affordable at 60% of the Hartford PMSA income level, which is $30,660 for a family of one and $35,040 for a family of two. • We are also proposing to build 20% of the units as market rate units to provide housing for others in need of this type of housing that are over our prescribed incomes. To sum up, we are proposing this development because we can not meet the demand at Berry Patch and because this site enjoys excellent proximity to essential services such as retail, medical, library and highway access. We believe it is an aesthetically pleasing building type, that it serves a very real and growing need in the local community, it will pay substantial real estate taxes ($1,000 per unit per year) without putting any children in the school system. I can not emphasize enough that this site is an exceptional site for senior housing. The sloped terrain accommodates our two story/access at grade building type, the proximity to the center of Town is excellent for shopping, Town Hall, and library access, as well as to enjoy other Town amenities. The adjacent assisted living is compatible and for some residents will provide for a continuum of care. Thank you for your consideration of this request. In the event that you wish to contact me, my phone number is 860-674-5641. Very truly yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. Geoffrey W. er reside - 4 k ~ DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects January 29, 2004 Mr. Geoffrey Sager,President The Metro Realty Group,LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 RE: Planning Report Berry Patch U Elderly Apartments Route 30(Oakland Road),Buckland Road&Deming Street South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 03-1823 Dear Geoff. As requested by your office and in my capacity as a professional planner,I have reviewed the proposed Berry Patch II elderly apartments, and the impact,if any, on area agricultural land and farming operations, and its relevance to the Connecticut Conservation Policies Plan. The subject 19.2-acre tract is being purchased from Fred S. Katten(14 acres)and Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God(5.2 acres). The Katten property is situated on the easterly side of Buckland Road, a four-lane arterial with full utilities(public sewer and water), and is immediately to the north of the 100-unit Village at Buckland Court assisted living facility(completed approximately 3 years ago), westerly of the Berry Patch I elderly housing development(now under construction), and opposite the entrance to a large retail area known as Town Center, replete with numerous financial institutions, restaurants, a large Stop&Shop grocery store, CVS pharmacy and other commercial uses. The entire Katten property was recently zoned by the Town of South Windsor for commercial purposes, as are all other parcels fronting on Buckland Road in South Windsor. The property is being sold by Fred Katten, who recently retired as a part-time gentleman farmer from West Hartford. The subject 14-acre parcel experienced limited use for a small herd(10±animals)of beef cattle,supported by two small sheds, a 1±-acre pasture in the front and a sloping S±-acre pasture to the rear. Given that most of this property is designated either wetlands or federal flood plain, its value as farmland was extremely limited, and that was the only land available to Mr.Katten in this vicinity for his small cattle operation. The Town's Plan of Conservation and Development and zoning regulations have clearly dedicated this land for intensive commercial development. The'Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God property is an 18-acre tract, 10 acres of which are commercially zoned and along Buckland Road,with the balance(8.0±acres)zoned for residential purposes,fronting on Deming Street and Grandview Terrace. It is southerly of the Village at Buckland Court assisted living facility and of the Berry Patch I apartments, westerly of the Grandview Terrace residential subdivision, and northerly of the Sele Drive residential subdivision. It has full urban utilities (public sanitary sewer and public water services). Berry Patch H will encompass 5.2 of those residential acres, and the remaining 2.8±acres is the subject of a pending 3-lot residential subdivision 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email: dpicivilnaolxom www.designprofessionalsinc.com DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners t surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects application, consistent with area development patterns. The church property has not been used for agricultural purposes for many years. It is anticipated that the 10 acres upon which the house of worship now sits will be the subject of a major commercial development in the near term,given that it is a prime tract situated at the northeast corner of the signalized Buckland Road/Deming Street intersection and is diagonally opposite the massive Evergreen Walk development now under construction. The residential portion of this parcel is an isolated parcel separate from any other agricultural properties. The Berry Patch I elderly apartments, consisting of 102 units on fourteen acres,now under construction, and to which the 94-unit Berry Patch II elderly apartments will be added, was recently purchased from Joseph&Donald Dzen, area farmers who have consolidated their farming operations to the northerly section of South Windsor in the vicinity of Barber Hill Road,over the line into East Windsor, and in Ellington. Years ago they concluded that it was best to have farming operations in a predominantly agricultural area, and not in an urban area,such as the isolated Berry Patch I and II properties. In fact,the subject 14 acres is residual from a prior sale of nine acres to accommodate the large 100-unit Village at Buckland Court assisted living facility at the westerly end of the Berry Patch I property. The original twenty-three acre tract was cultivated in strawberries. In order to fully comprehend the agricultural issue,I will first address any area parcels with existing or potential farmland and how they are situated with respect to area land uses and known or anticipated development. Aside from the subject Katten parcel,there are no contiguous agricultural properties of any appreciable size. The nearest substantive agricultural properties are: 1). The Priest property, situated approximately one mile to the northwest along State Route 194, which was purchased from the Priest family for agriculture and/or recreation purposes. In 2001,it was the subject of an unsuccessful Town referendum in which it was proposed to be developed into recreation fields for youth;2). The Buckland Road corridor area,which includes the Katten property, encompasses Buckland Road from the Manchester town line to State Route 30. It contains many farm fields and tobacco sheds. The westerly side of the road, encompassing approximately 250 acres,was recently sold by the Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford to a group of investors who are proposing a large commercial development known as Evergreen Walk. The Town recently approved a plan for development of 1.2 million square feet of retail and office space at the site. Specifically, site plan approvals have been granted for the first phase of that development,now under construction, consisting of a large medical office/emergency room facility being built by Eastern Connecticut Health Network (i.e., Manchester and Rockville Hospitals), diagonally opposite and southwest of the Calvary Church property, a large Home Depot Expo Center, a fitness center and a large"lifestyles center"retail development(375,000 sq. ft. of space)containing national chain stores,restaurants and financial institutions. Major construction work was initiated this fall,with an anticipated completion date of late summer. The easterly side of the corridor has already started commercial development, most recently with the opening of_Target and Lowe's stores. The entire corridor is zoned for commercial development; 3). The Foster Farm/Krawski Farm properties,about a mile easterly of Berry Patch I and E, containing 107 acres. The Foster family recently closed down much of its unprofitable dairy operation and has been attempting alternate farming enterprises in order to remain profitable, while the Krawski farm is subject to change with the recent death of its owner;and 4). The only other area farming operation was on the south side of Deming Street,approximately one-half mile from the Berry 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755:Fax:(860)291-8757 Email: dpicivilgaol.com www.designprofessionalsinc.com DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects Patch site. This field is being developed as the 117-lot Deming Hill Estates single-family subdivision. Some six of seven phases have been completed at time of writing. This site backs up to the Buckland Hills regional mall. The balance of the surrounding area has been substantially developed. To the north and across Route 30 from the Berry Patch I site is the LaCava Farm Brook subdivision,which was finished six years ago. To the east is a Mobil gas station and the Wapping Shopping Center. In my review of the 1998-2003 Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan/Locational Guide Map, dated May 1998, as it pertains to the Berry Patch II site,I find the subject parcel predominantly falls within the lightest green area,with a small amount of white area in the vicinity of the easterly Katten property, and a tan area in the front of the Katten property. White areas are designated for"Rural Lands",which are defined as rural lands generally remote from existing urban areas and are lacking public water and sewer services as well as industrial, commercial or residential concentrations. Clearly, as was the case with the Berry Patch I development, with public water and sewer facilities serving the Berry Patch site,the Village at Buckland Court,the Mobil station,Wapping Shopping Center,Evergreen Walk,the Buckland Road corridor,Deming Street, and the Farm Brook, Grandview Terrace, Sele Drive and Deming Hill Estates subdivisions,this"rural" designation no longer applies and is invalid. The light green area is designated for conservation,representing opportunities to provide for the state's food,fiber,water and other resources. While I agree that the Foster Farm and Priest properties may be able to continue to provide valuable food,fiber and other resources,the small, isolated properties south of Route 30, such as the Katten,Calvary Church and Berry Patch I properties, are of insufficient size to independently provide food,fiber and other resources. On the other hand, they will provide valuable shelter for our growing elderly population,places to worship, and a place to buy goods and services. This too is an inappropriate designation for the subject property, and I recommend it and the other properties south of Route 30 be removed from the"conservation"area. It should be noted,however,that the majority of the Katten property(9±acres)is being conserved in perpetuity via a conservation easement in favor of the South Windsor Land Conservation Trust. Also, approximately 1 acre of the 5.2-acre parcel being acquired from the Calvary Church will be preserved in perpetuity by a conservation easement. The tan area contiguous to Buckland Road, is designated for"growth areas". Within the conservation and development policies plan,the state action strategy reads, "high priority and affirmative support toward concentration of new urban growth which occurs outside of regional centers into specified areas capable of supporting large-scale,mixed uses and densities in close relationship to the regional centers". The Plan's definitional criteria goes on to reference this growth should be in conformity with municipal plans(and it is), and should have water or sewer services(and it does). This is an appropriate designation for the entire Berry Patch I and II properties. In summary, and in my opinion as a professional planner with more than two and one-half decades of government and consulting experience,the"rural"and"conservation"area designations at the subject property do not meet criteria for such a designation, as expressed in the Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan. Accordingly,these areas should be modified, and if necessary, depicted as "neighborhood conservation areas"or"growth areas",for they meet the criteria embodied within the Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan for these two categories. 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel:(860)291-8755=Fax: (860)291-8757 Email: ddpicivilgool.com www.designprofessionalsinc.com y . DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners i surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦landscape architects My current resume is attached for your review, along with a location plan and Berry Patch II site plan. Sincerely, DESIGN MqftSSIONALS,INC. By: Peter R. De allie President 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil e.aol.com www.designprofessionalsinc.com r 74 Abb 540 P,�.` � Y A ormo�a+E err AM 74 auarvw �' �F 'A 'k aay� wa.PAllU lUPON T DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. __ 1 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects 1104 RESUME Peter R. DeMallie/President& Principal EDUCATION: *Master of Community Planning,University of Rhode Island,Kingston,Rhode Island. *Bachelor of Arts,Hiram College,Hiram,Ohio. *High School Diploma,Staples High School,Westport,Connecticut. EXPERIENCE: *Professional Urban Planner since 1974. (key positions in municipalities,regional planning agency,and planning/civillgis/survey/landscape architecture consulting firm). *Directly participated in over 700 municipal night meetings while a government official,i.e.,through May 1986. *Reviewed over$1/2 billion in land development proposals for communities.- *Authored master plans,zoning,and subdivision regulations. Supervised map preparation&GIS automation services. *Experienced in urban,suburban,and rural planning environments. President&Founding Principal-Design Professionals,Inc. Manage staff of 15 planners,landscape architects,civil engineers, gis analysts,&land surveyors.Supervise map preparation and G.I.S.data automation services. Plan and coordinate numerous governmental,industrial,residential,commercial,&institutional development projects throughout Connecticut. Author zoning and subdivision regulations. Presently providing consulting Town Planner services to Woodstock. Provided consulting Town Planner services to Killingly and Burlington,Connecticut.Tenure has been 17+years(since 5/86). Director o Planning-South Windsor,Connecticut. (Suburban Hartford,Pop.23,000). Department head position reporting directly to the Town Manager. Primary responsibilities were to evaluate land development proposals and to formulate community growth policies. Tenure highlights:Authored Town Plan components,major transportation study,and innovative zoning regulations governing housing and industrial parks. Town representative to Greater Hartford policymaking bodies. Supervised Town mapping preparation. Concurrent interim positions:Building Department Administrator(1980/81);Zoning Enforcement Officer(1980/81);Economic Development Coordinator(1984). Tenure was 6.5 years(12/79-5/86). Senior Planner-Northeastern Connecticut Regional Planning Agency. Agency's number 2 position(some 20+employees). Chief planner/supervisor for HUD 701 planning,Grant-in-Aid,and EPA 208 Water Quality Programs. Position's assignments covered:housing;water quality;site plan review;and the region's Economic Development Plan. Regional Planner at same agency. Performed site plan reviews for municipalities and the Eastern Connecticut Environmental Review Team. Drafted numerous regulations,ordinances,and Town Plan amendments. Supervised Town and regional maps preparation. Functioned as on-call land use planner to 10 communities. Tenure at agency was 325 years(10/76-12/79). Town Planner-Killingly,Connecticut(Pop. 15,000). Performed planning and zoning administration,subdivision&site plan review,and made regular presentations before governmental bodies. Authored Town Plan amendments,subdivision and zoning regulations. Supervised Town maps preparation. Tenure was 2.25 years(concurrent with Regional Planner position). Other Positions-Greater Bridgeport Regional Planning Agency. New York City headquarters of Crane Company. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION AND AWARDS: Member,American Society of Consulting Planners(1986-present);Charter Member,American Planning Association(1978- present);President,South Windsor Chamber of Commerce(1992-1993),Board Member(1988 2003),Executive Committee (1990-1994),Legislative Committee Chairman(1987-1992,1993-1997),President,Celebrate Windsor!Inc./SummerWind Performing Arts Center(2002-present)&Board Member(2001- ),Member,CBIA(1996 present);Member,South Windsor Ambassador Club(1994 to present),Board Member&Executive Committee(1992-present),Secretary(1993-4),Treasurer (1994-1996),Vice-President/Operations&Personnel(1996-present),President-Elect(1999 to 2000)&President(2000- 2003)Greater Hartford Tourism District;Chairman,East of the River Tourism&Convention District(1991-1993),Board Member&Executive Committee(1983-1993);Board Member&Executive Committee(2003 present)&Secretary(2003- present)Central Connecticut Tourism District; Member,Savings Bank of Rockville Advisory Board(1985-1994),Member, 25th Anniversary Fund Committee,University of Rhode Island Graduate Curriculum in Community Planning; Member,The Hartford Club(1988-1995), Steering Committee,East of the River Chambers of Commerce Association(1992-1993); Recipient of American Institute of Planners'Student Award for Outstanding Achievement(bestowed 1976 at the University of Rhode Island); Certificates of Appreciation from: American Red Cross(Connecticut Floods of 1984), S.Windsor Exchange Club(1983); South Windsor Chamber of Commerce(1986&2003), East of the River Tourism&Convention District(1993), South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency(1996),South Windsor historical Society(Lifetime Membership bestowed 12/97); Town of South Windsor(1998/2000 volunteer appreciation?Greater Hartford Tourism District(1999);and Ellington High School(5/7/03). 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax:(960)291-8757 Email:dnicivil(daol.com t0W N SF4 To� 0_ps_o� V&U&ot s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL WWO 7002 3150 0002 0356 3663 February 9, 2004 \o\A 7002 3150 0002 0356 3670 Mr. Geoffrey Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 10 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Mr. George Daniels South Windsor Housing Authority 50 Elm Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl#03-83P, Berry Patch II Special Exception and Site Plan Dear Mr. Sager and Mr. Daniels: We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on January 27, 2004,to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Site Plan of Development and Special Exception to Section 4.1.11 and 7.1.2.4 and Site Plan of Development for an additional 94 units and a waiver to allow up to 196 units for properties located on the easterly side of'BucklandRoad, §outherly side.of Oakland Road, and northerly of Deming Street, AAz30 zone, Gateway Development Zone, and floodplain zone as shown on plans prepared by Design-Professionals, Inc.,Job No.. 1823, dated December 12, 2003, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building.permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the'conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission,.including a bond in the amount of$25,000 for erosion -and sediment control,-and:a bond in the amount of$20,000 to ensure installation and establishment of the stormwater structures. 4. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. A landscape bond in the amount of$10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. . t 6. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 7. WPCA approval is required. 8. The building(s) street number must be included on the final plan. 9. The Commission hereby grants a waiver to Section 4.1.11.2.c to allow 196 total units. 10. Town Engineer's review comments dated January 9,2004 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 11. Required restrictive covenants to the South Windsor Housing Authority must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Attorney. 12. A sidewalk is required from Berry Patch II to Buckland Road and across Buckland Road frontage to the traffic signal at Terry Office Park. 13. The floodplain area near Buckland Road must be restored after construction with an attractive landscaping that includes seasonal interest wildflowers and shrubs. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets 3A and 3B with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans(including landscaping and architectural plans), a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. Sincerely, Tim by . Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Design Professionals, Inc. I, Timothy Wentzell, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission,hereby certify that on January 27, 2004,the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Metro Realty Group, LTD and South Windsor Housing Authority a Special Exception to Article 4.1.11 and Article 7.1.2.4 of the Zoning Regulations and Site Plan o f Development for the construction of an additional 94 units and a waiver to allow up to 196 units for properties located on the easterly side of Buckland Road, southerly side of Oakland Road,northerly of Deming Street,AA30- Zone, Gateway Development Zone, and floodplain zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., Project No. 1823, dated December 12, 2003, as revised. Assessor's Map and Parcel Number: Map#51, 38 Parcel#32, 2 More particularly bounded and described as follows: Parcel#1 Map 51,Parcel 32 (Katten Property) Commencing at a stone bound in the easterly line of Buckland Road, which said bound Is-located at the southwesterly corner of land of Pauline K. Fox;*thence running south 860 16' 50" east and along land of Pauline K. Fox, a distance of two hundred three and ninety one hundredths (203.90) feet to a stone bound; thence turning north 110 11' 15" east and along land of the said Fox, a distance of one-hundred twenty-five and nineteen one hundredths (125.19) feet-to an iron pipe at land now or formerly of Norman J. Dorey, thence turning south 860 50' 10" east, a distance of one hundred four and eighty-one (104.81) feet to a stone bound; thence turning north 10*15' 25" west a distance of seventy-seven and 54 one hundredths (77.54) feet to a stone bound;thence turning north 560 48' 10" east, a distance of one hundred forty-nine and forty-one one hundredths (149.41) feet to a stone bound at land now or formerly of Stein; thence turning south 610 55' 15" east and along land of the said Stein and land now or formerly of Mangino, a distance of six hundred seventy-seven and seventy one-hundredths (677.70) feet to a pin set at a fence post; thence turning south 550 9' 40" east, a distance.of one hundred three and seventy-eight orte hundredths (103.78) feet to an Iron pipe at land now or formerly of Richard H. Simler; thence turning south 100 46' 55" west and along land of the said Simler, a distance of - four hundred eighty-five and twenty-nine one hundredths (485.29) feet to a stone bound at land now or formerly of Norman M. Petersen; thence turning north 719 6' 15" west and along land of the said Petersen, a distance of seven hundred twenty-seven and eighty-three one.hundredths - (727.83) feet to an Iron pin; thence turning south 850 25' 10" west, a distance of one hundred eighty-eight and forty-four one-hundredths (108.44) feet to a stone bound; thence turning south 160 39' 20" west a distance of one hundred seventy-three and thirty one-hundredths (173.30) feet to a stone bound,thencee Lurning north 810 38' 20" west, a distance of two hundred eighteen and forty-two one;hundredths (218.42) feet to a stone bound on the easterly side of Buckland Road; thence turning north 11° 50' 35" east and along the easterly side of Buckland Road, a distance of five hundred seventeen and seventy- three (517.73) feet to the point and place of beginning. *and being the northwesterly corner of the herein conveyed piece Said premises are more particularly shown on a certain map entitled "Property of Peter Karmazyn Buckland Rd. South Windsor Connecticut W.M. Alford Civil Engineer Windsor, Conn. Scale:l,.in. =40 ft..Date: Aug., 1970", which said premises will be placed on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said premises are subject to building, building line and zoning and other municipal ordinances of the Town of South Windsor. Said premises are subject to.a right of way as;of record will fully appear.! Parcel#2 Map 38, Parcel 2 (Calvery Church) 11with All that certain piece or parcel of land, together all buildings and improvements thereon, containing 36.9 lacres, more or less, situated on the northeasterly corner of Deming .Street and Buckland 'Road In the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: NORTHERLY: by land now or formerly of Norman Peterson . and Peter Rarmazyn, in part by each; EASTERLY: by Felt Road, so-called (formerly Creamery Road); SOUTHERLY: by Deming Street; and WESTERLY: by Buckland Road and- land now or formerly of Peter Y.armazyn, in part by each. Said premises are the same premises conveyed to the Grantor herein by Committee Deed (Lawrence P. Rubinow, Committee) dated June 30, 1978 and recorded in Volume 246,i� Page 209 of the 'South Windsor Land Records.- Said premises are subject to the second half of taxes due on the List of October 1, 1977, which the grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay as part consideration on this deed. OWNER OF RECORD: Parcel 1 -Fred S. Katten; Parcel 2—Calvery Church of the Assemblies of God Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 9TH day of February 2004. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Tunothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of 19 at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: t�W N Sf4 O 9 ,c, O-P siou� ?V&U&01t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soR-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 February 13,2004 Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn: Karen Isherwood RE: Berry Patch II Buckland Road South Windsor,CT Dear Ms.Isherwood: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its special meeting of February 9,2004,gave . approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a senior apartment complex on Buckland. Road;as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Berry Patch 11,Topographic Plan"prepared by Design Professionals,Project No. 1823,Drawing No(s)4Adated 11-04-03'revised 12-04-03 and 12-12-03,and Drawing No.4B,dated 11-04-03,revised 12-04-03, 12-11-03, 12-12-03 subject to the following conditions: 1. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. 2. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once The sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written Verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority,and meeting all.Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, L4 Jo ph J.Carino,Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority JCC:dd Cc: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager Michael J.Gantick,Director of Public Works Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer / Marcia Banach,Director of Planning V Chris Dougan,Chief Building Inspector South Windsor Housing Authority Metro Realty Group,LTD s ti ROGIN, NASSAU, CAPLAN, WsmAN & HIRTLE, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW CITYPLACE I, 22ND FLOOR 185 ASYLUM STREET RECEIVED HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06103-3460 TELEPHONE (860) 278-7480 FF'`5 FAX (860) 278-2179 SOUTH WiNDSpkpLMNINGDEPT. LEWIS K.WISE 1wise@rogin1aw.com February 25, 2004 Ms. Marcia Banach Director of Planning 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074-2786 Is Re: Berry Patch II Approval 3' Dear Marcia: Condition of Approval#11 for the above-referenced appeal requires that the Planning &Zoning Commission("TPZ") and the Town Attorney must review and approve the necessary restrictive covenants for this project. It is my understanding that we submitted a revised restrictive covenant sometime ago which will be used for both Berry Patch I and II. Please advise whether it has been reviewed and approved by the TPZ and the Town Attorney. Thank you for your ongoing cooperation. Y ourly, LKW:pgl cc: Geoff Sager Peter DeMallie W:\Public\LWise\Sager\Banach 2-25-04.doc 2/25/04 VOL. 15 F 4 PAGE 71 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 84� —' This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants made this ($day of December,2003 by Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership("Declarant"),a Connecticut limited partnership with an office c/o The Metro Realty Group,Ltd.,6 Executive Drive, Farmington,CT 06032. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Declarant is the owner of certain property in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,which property is described on Exhibit A attached hereto(the"Property");and WHEREAS,in order to comply with the requirements of a certain special permit granted by the Planning&Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor under Section 4.1 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations, Declarant wishes to subject the Property to certain restrictions. J` NOW,THEREFORE,Declarant does hereby declare and establish that,as long as the Property is zoned to allow elderly housing pursuant to the South Windsor Zoning Regulations,or for a period of forty(40)years,whichever is longer,the Property shall be — subject to the following restrictions: 1. The architecture,colors,heights,materials and floor plan comprising each building and the site plan shall be subject to the prior written approval of the South Windsor Housing Authority or its successor. Any change of the same shall require the prior written approval of said Authority. 2. The maintenance of the buildings and landscaping shall be consistent with Y the level and quality of landscaping and maintenance provided by the Authority for its other developments. 3. Each dwelling unit on the Property shall be occupied by: ited ates (a) Persons who are 62 years of age or older. just een (b) A spouse of an occupant pursuant to(a)above. (c) An occupant pursuant to(b)above who survives his or her spouse. (d) An occupant pursuant to(b)above whose spouse has entered into a long term health care facility. \\Caplan\Documents\Public\RKabakofl\Metro\Ber Patch\Declaration of Restrictive Covenants final clean.doc 12/17/0310:18 AM 21 „4 -sa f f _Y E 3, VOL. 15 6 4 PAGE 72 (e) Regarding subparagraph(c)and(d)above,in the event of the v remarriage or cohabitation by the remaining spouse,all occupants must comply with the occupancy requirements set forth in this Section 3. j 4. It is understood and agreed that this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is intended to run with the land and subject any successor owners of the Property to its terms. In this respect this Declaration shall be recorded in the land records for the Town of South Windsor. It is further understood and agreed that this Declaration may be enforced by(i)the Town of South Windsor or(ii)the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission,(iii)the South Windsor Housing Authority,or(iv)any combination 1 of the foregoing bodies.Nothing in the paragraph shall preclude any person from exercising whatever right she or he may have to enforce this Declaration. _ 3 IN WITNESS WHE� OF,the Declarant has hereby executed this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants this 11`day of December,2003. Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership By: Berry Patch GP,LLC its General partner Geoffrey W.Sa r Its Managing Mem er j STATE OF CONNECTICUT) } 1` )ss: l COUNTY OF ) Personally appeared the said Geoffrey W. Sager,Managing Member of Berry Patch GP,LLC,general partner of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership,signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said Be Patch Associates Limited Partnership, before me. �i Commissioner of the Superior Court Natary_� My.{3Expires i \\Caplan\Documents\Public\RKabakoff\Metro\Berry Patch\Declaration of Restrictive Covenants final s l clean.doc > 12/17/0310:l 8 AM i 3 a s i f 1 i r VOL. 15 fi 4 PAGE 73 EXHIBIT A A certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut shown on a map or plan entitled"Perimeter Survey ALTA/ACSM Survey Resurvey Prepared For:Berry Patch Associates Limited x Partnership 205 Oakland Road South Windsor,Connecticut Date: 11/03/03,Revised to r 11/10/03 scale I inch=50 ft.,prepared by Design Professionals,Inc." which map or plan is to be filed in the office of the South Windsor Town Clerk and which piece or parcel of land is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marked by a drill hole in brownstone in the apparent general southwesterly line of Oakland Road a/k/a Connecticut Route 30 which point marks a Northwesterly corner of the premises herein described and a Northeasterly corner of land Y= now or formerly of Pauline G.Johnson;thence,S.37°1 V 46"W.,a distance of 147.46 feet to a brownstone;thence continuing along said Johnson,N.45°51'28"W.,a distance of 119.61 feet to a concrete monument;thence continuing along said Johnson,S. 391 34' 11"W.,a distance of 179.98 feet to a granite monument;thence continuing along said Johnson and land now or formerly of Anton Simler,Jr.,in part on each,N.611 31'51" ron pin;thence N.52°09'44"W.,along line of W.,in all,a distance of 293.72 feet to an i said Simler,a distance of 108.86 feet to an.iron pin;thence N.76°58'41"W.,still along line of land of said Simler,a distance of 70.51 feet to a point;thence N. 89° 13' 59"W., still along line of said Simler,a distance of 216.28 feet to a granite monument;thence continuing along line of land now or formerly of Fred S. Katten,N.85°29'41"W.,a distance of 114.91 feet to a point;thence S.03°48'46"E.,along line of land now or formerly The Village at Buckland Court,Limited Partnership,a distance of 568.71 feet to a point;thence S.76°28' 10"E.,along property now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God,a distance of 10.97 feet to an iron pin;thence S.76 17 19 E., along line of said Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God,land now or formerly of Robert N.&Amy L.Gamache and land now or formerly of Karen A.&Edward J. O'Connor,in part on each,in all a distance of 696.49 feet to an iron pin;thence continuing S.73°59'02"F.,along land now or formerly of Robert&Penelope P. Torrani and land now or formerly of Michael J.and Kristina G.Suppicich,in part on each,in all a distance of 621.53 feet to an:iron pin in line of Felt Road;thence,N.211 13' 25"E.,along Felt Road,a distance of 95.98 feet to and iron pin;thence,N.68°45' 26" W.,along line of land now or formerly of:Lois H. Petersen,a distance of 182.82 feet to an iron pin;thence N.42°17' 02"W.,still along line of said Petersen, a distance of h 489.28 feet to a concrete monument;thence N.371 39'09"E.,still along line of land of said Petersen,a distance of 355.51 feet to. broken monument in line of said Oakland Road;thence N.42° 14' 34"W.,along Oakland Road,a distance of 61.78 feet to the drill hole in a brownstone monument which marks the point and place of beginning. Said parcel contains 14.01 acres of land,more or less. - R=EIV OR RECORD: TETIME I 2S M. TOWN GL ERK.SOUTH WIN OR.CT \\Caplan\Doomeau\PubBe\RKebakotM9etm\B,"Pateh\tk le\Legal Deecnpti—d- r 12/19/03 s x ROGIN, NASSAU, CAPLAN, L.ASSMAN & HIRTLE, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW CITYPLACE 1, 22ND FLOOR 185 ASYLUM STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06103-3460 TELEPHONE (860) 278-7480 FAX (860) 278-2179 LEWIS K.WISE lwise@roginlaw.com March 4, 2004 Ms. Marcia Banach Director of Planning 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074-2786 Re: Berry Patch HApproval Dear Ms. Banach: As you know, my client, Metro Realty Group LTD, will utilize the identical Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for Berry Patch II that was reviewed and approved by the Town Attorney and the Planning and Zoning Commission for Berry Patch I. Accordingly, this will confirm our understanding that we need not submit this document for a second round of review and approval. Upon acquiring the parcels necessary for the Berry Patch II development, my client will record the Declaration on the land records which will reference those parcels. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours v r truly, e Wise LKW:pgl cc: Geoff Sager Peter DeMallie W:\Public\LWise\Sager\Banach 3-4-04.doc 3/4/04 CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY Michael J.Ward Administrator April 5, 2004 Multifamily Underwriting T ucal Services The Honorable Matt Galligan LA R 12 2004 Town Manager SOUTH NI?l\I Town of South Windsor -- woR 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Notice of Public Official Requirement Relative to Section 42 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Provision Berry Patch, CT-04-011 Dear Mr. Galligan: In accordance with Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code, as adopted in 1986 and amended in 1993,when a development is proposed utilizing Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, the chief executive or head public official in that town or city shall be notified and given an opportunity to comment. A brief project description is enclosed for your information on the above-captioned tax credit application. The enclosed summary is presently under CHFA staff review subject to ranking and rating in accordance with the State Allocation Plan. Upon conclusion of this review, it is anticipated that the successful applicants will be presented to CHFA's Board of Directors for approval on May 26, 2004. Please contact me relative to your comments, if any,prior to May 3, 2004. Sincerely, Michael J. Ward MJW/gth Enclosure 1ihtc\gen'1\2004-r1.ceo �oJs\NG.F��gy U D 999 West Street/Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067-4005/860-721-9501 a CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY CHFA#: CT-04-011 Name: Berry Patch II Address: Buckland Oakland Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Description: The proposal is for the new construction of five, two-story buildings consisting of 94 elderly units on 5.28 acres . Berry Patch II will consist of 31 one- bedroom units averaging 795 square feet and 63 two-bedroom units averaging 943 square feet. Four percent of units are available to f amilies at 25% AMI, nine percent of units are available to families at 50%AMI, sixty-seven percent of units are available to families at 60%AMI and the remaining 20% will be rented at market rate . The sponsor is requesting an allocation of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits from the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority(CHFA). Permanent financing includes CHFA, deferred developer loan and early rental proceeds. oz - L .2- /0 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION commissioner of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION commissioner of Public safety W'•• *<„"" 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546 Commissioner of Motor vehicles NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546 Phone: (860)594-3020 July 21, 2004 Mr. Goeffrey Sager Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership �- 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 � ' Dear Mr. Sager: 4- Subject: Town of South Windsor Berry Patch Adult Living Community Enclosed is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 approved at the July 20, 2004 meeting of the State Traffic -Commission, detailing conditions for the issuance of a Certificate. In accordance with Section 14-311 of the General Statutes, a building/ foundation permit cannot be obtained from the Town .until a certificate is issued. A certificate will not be issued by this office until: 1. the Traffic Investigation Report has been recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with Condition No. 13; 2. a bond, sufficient to cover the full cost of implementing the required improvements, has been posted with the Department of Transportation District No. I Office (Attn: Mr. David Sawicki) at 1107 Cromwell Avenue in the Town of Rocky Hill, CT 06067, (860)258-4506, as noted in Condition No. 12; and 3. this office has been notified of the above. Additionally, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the District Office prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. The approval will expire on July 19, 2006, unless all the requirements are satisfied. Very truly yours, Robbin L. Cabelus Executive Director Enclosures CC: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Christopher Dougan - Please confirm certificate issuance with STC. Planning and Zoning Commission Mr. Ted J. DeSantos, P.E. , PTOE Mr. Richard J. Porth An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled or recovered paper TRA-10 REV 1197 Report By: YKN Date: 07/04 STATE OF CONNECTICUT STC No: 132-0402-01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Checked By: PJC Date: 0704 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc. No: REPORT TO THE See Previous Traffic_Investigation Report STATE TRAFFIC COABUSSION Approved By STC No. Town of South Windsor Date: JUL 2 0 2004 Requested By: Location: Route 30 (Oakland Road)at Drive Berry Patch Associates Limited to Berry Patch Adult Living Partnership Community How Requested: Certificate Application Certificate Date: February 2004 Not- . EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Issued Recommendation: In accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as revised, It is recommended that the State Traffic Commission(STC)issue a certificate to Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership for Berry Patch Adult Living Community, 198.residential units and a 13,012 square foot clubhouse with a total of 263 parking spaces, located on Route 30 (Oakland Road) in the Town of South Windsor, stating that the operation thereof will not imperil the safety of the public based on the following conditions. The requirements are based on and referenced to the plans entitled: "Widening Plan- Oakland Road (Rt. 30)" prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., Sheet 1 of 1, dated June 23,2004 and last revised on July 13, 2004. 1. That the site driveways on Route 30 and Felt Road Ext.be constructed insubstantial conformance with the referenced plan. 2. That Route 30 be widened to provide westbound left-turn bypass area in substantial conformance with the referenced plan. 3. That the owner provide and maintain 650 feet intersection sight distance to the east and west along Route 30 measured at a point 15 feet back from the new edge of travelway. 4. That the applicant overlay Route 30 within the'limits of the widening. The extent of the overlay is to be determined by the Department's District 1 Maintenance Office. 5. That signs and pavement markings on Route 30 be installed by the applicant in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, and in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" latest edition. The applicant will be responsible to maintain signs and pavement markings on the site drives. By Division of Traffic ngmeermg Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations 1 Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 Town of South Windsor Berry Path Adult Living Community STC No. 132-0402-01 6. That all pavement markings installed by the applicant on State roads be of epoxy material, or of a material as directed by the Department of Transportation. 7. That approach grades of the driveways and town roads along Route 30 affected by the roadway widenings to be undertaken by the applicant, meet Department standards for intersecting streets or not be increased. S. That prior to the issuance of a certificate, that the applicant obtain the sightline easement necessary to satisfy Condition No. 3 of this report. 9. That an encroachment permit be obtained from the Department of Transportation's District 1 Office prior to performing any work within the State highway right-of-way. The permit forms must include the applicable detailed construction plans. 10. That all work on roadways that are owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in conformance with the standards and specifications of the Town. 11. That all roadway'and drainage improvements within the State's right-of-way be subject to review by the Department of Transportation and all their requirements including those pertaining to maintenance and protection of traffic be satisfied prior to the issance of a permit for work within the right-of-way. 12. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate,the applicant post and maintain a bond in the amount of $240,000 to cover the costs of satisfying the conditions of this report. Upon submission of the final design plans, the dollar amount of this bond may be adjusted either upward or downward during the encroachment permit review process. 13. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate,a copy of this report be recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with the attached procedure. A copy of the Certificate shall be recorded on the land records upon issuance. 14. That the STC reserves the right to require additional improvements or changes, as deemed necessary, due to the development's traffic in the future. The cost of any additional. improvements or changes shall be borne by the owner of the development. Mr. Ted DeSantos, P.E., the applicant's authorized representative, concurred with all the above recommendations, except for Condition No. 14, on July 8, 2004. Police Sgt. Richard Bond, representing the Police Chief Gary K. Tyler, the Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, concurred with the above recommendations on July 8, 2004. 2 . w Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Berry Path Adult Living Community Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 Site Description: The 198 units of Berry Path Adult Living Community are being proposed on the west side of Route 30, approximately 1,250 feet north of the Felt Road Ext. intersection in the Town of South Windsor. Two stop controlled access drives are proposed to be constructed on Felt Road and Route 30. Route 30 (Oakland Road): Route 30 is a two-lane, bi-directional roadway approximately 34 feet in width. In the vicinity of the proposed access drive, the posted speed limit is 40 mph and the 85th percentile speed is approximately 45 mph. The 2002 ADT for Route 30 is 12,400 vehicles. Felt Road Extension: Felt Road is a two lane, bi-directional, town-owned roadway. It is approximately 0.3 mile in length. It intersects with Route 30 to form a four-way signalized intersection. The posted speed limit on Felt Road is 25 mph. Traffic Generation: It is anticipated that the proposed development will generate approximately 40 vehicle trips (18 entering and 22 exiting) during the afternoon peak hour. The projected trip distribution from Route 30 is approximately 34 percent from the east, 49 percent from the west and 17 percent from Felt Road. The volumes have been reviewed and approved by the Department's Bureau of Policy and Planning. It is anticipated that the generated traffic by the proposed development will have no significant impact in the area. Accident Experience: The latest available accident data for the three-year period, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003, reported 12 accidents occurring at the intersection of Route 30 and Felt Road Ext. Conclusion: Although the projected traffic is limited, it is desirable to widen the north side of Route 30 to provide a westbound left-turn bypass area at the proposed access drive. Therefore, to cover the costs of satisfying the conditions of this report, a bond in the amount of$240,000 will be posted with the Department of Transportation. 3 August 10, 2004 Mrs. Karen Isherwood Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re:Preconstruction Meeting—Appl 03-83P, Berry Patch II dated August 5, 2004 IN ATTENDANCE Karen Isherwood DPI. 165 South Satellite Road 860 291-8755 Denise Mazzoli Cox Cable 801 Parker Street 860 432-5041 Armand DiMatteo DCI 55 Corporate Avenue 860 747-0339 Eddy Majewski Metro Construction 6 Executive Drive 860 647-7544 Matt Maher DCI 55 Corporate Avenue 860 747-0339 Jeff Doolittle TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue 860 644-2511 x245 Bernie Drabek TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue 860 644-2511 x241 Marcia Banach TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue 860 644-2511 x250 Dear Mrs. Isherwood: The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Oakland Road, Felt Road, and/or Buckland Road. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist (requested, required) for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six (6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2) inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures, pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary) of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to paving and after subgrade formation. 9. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. 10. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 11. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Eddy Majewski in the field at phone number 648-2012, 648-2095 ,or cell phone number 250-2977. 12. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 13. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 14. Seventy-two (72)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 15. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 16. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m., no work on Sunday. 17. DOT permit needed for all work within state road (Oakland Road). Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 18. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 19. A drain layers permit is required for the installation of the sewer main and all building laterals. 20. A street cut permit is required for any access from Buckland Road. 21. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore, the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 22. Inspection of gravel access road required prior to placement of topsoil. 23. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as—builts. 24. For concrete sidewalks, 8"depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk is constructed before lot development, the locations must be indicated on the as-built plans. If a proposed driveway location is moved,the sidewalk must be removed to the nearest expansion joint and rebuilt to the proper depth with reinforcement. 25. During construction of individual sanitary sewer laterals, the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. Planning Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. Erosion and Sediment control bonds must be posted prior to the start for construction. 3. Buckland Road sidewalks must be Portland concrete. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting(if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, Jeffrey B. Doolittle Town Engineer JBD/kak cc: Marica Banach, Director of Planning Karl Reichle, Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works Christopher Dougan, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal CL&P SBC voL. 1674PAGE 328 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 0 8 2- 8 0 This Easement Agreement made this 1S1 day of"_ , 2004 by and between GF Windsor SH LLC, a Delaware limited liability with an office at 432 Buckland Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 (`Buckland Court") and Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, a Connecticut limited partnership with an office at 6 Executive Drive, Farmington, Connecticut ("Berry Patch")Berry Patch II Associates Limited Partnership, a Connecticut limited partnership with an office at 6 Executive Drive, Farmington, CT 06032 ("Berry Patch IT'). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Buckland Court is the owner of certain property in South Windsor, Connecticut, which property(the `Buckland Court Property") is described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Berry Patch is the owner of certain property in South Windsor, CT, which property(the "Berry Patch Property") is described on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Berry Patch II is the owner of certain property in South Windsor, CT, which property(the `Berry Patch II Property") is described on Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Buckland Court wishes to grant to Berry Patch and to Berry Patch II an emergency egress easement and to Berry Patch II a sanitary s r easement over portions of the Buckland Court Property; and WHEREAS, Berryagreed to construct Patch II has g ty-40) parking spaces on the Buckland Court Property. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Buckland Court, Berry Patch and Berry Patch II hereby agree as follows: 1. Buckland Court hereby grants to Berry Patch and to Berry Patch II, and their successors and assigns, as an appurtenance to the Berry Patch Property and the Berry Patch II Property, a perpetual non-exclusive easement, in common with any and all patrons, tenants, invitees, agents, employees and licensees of the Buckland Court Property, to pass and repass on foot and by vehicle over and upon the surface of those portions of the Buckland Court Property consisting of the interior roadways therein and sidewalks adjacent thereto that are shown on o Exhibit D attached hereto (as they shall exist from time to time, provided that no change in the o same by Buckland Court shall impair Berry Patch's and B rry Patch II's ability to obtain such T emergency egress in accordance with the requirements of ge Town of South Windsor) (such z � areas being hereinafter referred to as the "Existing Acces�Easement Areas"), together with the me right to construct, maintain, inspect, use, operate, repair and replace, and to pass and repass on 0 foot and by vehicle upon the surface of, a road or driveway, and sidewalks adjacent thereto, in z the area shown as "New Access Easement Area" on Exhibit D attached hereto (the New Access 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111�1 1111111111111 I IN /\ USIDOCS4853111v1 Doc ID: 000344320013 Type: LAN Book 1674 Page 328 - 340 -File# 8280 _ VOL. 1674PAcE 329 the area shown as "New Access Easement Area" on Exhibit D attached hereto (the New Access Easement Area, together with the Existing Access Easement Areas, being hereinafter together referred to as the "Access Easement Areas"),provided that the Access Easement Areas may only be used by Berry Patch and Berry Patch II and their successors and assigns for emergency egress from the Berry Patch II Property to Buckland Road. 2. Berry Patch II agrees to install a gated fence across the entrance to the New Access Easement Area, at the shared property line between the Berry Patch II Property and the Buckland Court Property, so as to restrict access to the Access Easement Areas to emergency egress only, and agrees to maintain and repair(including snow and ice removal and landscaping adjacent thereto)the New Access Easement Area in compliance with Federal, State and local laws and regulations at its cost and further agrees that all site improvements and landscaping installed in connection with the New Access Easement Area(including such gated fence) shall be subject to Buckland Court's written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 3. Buckland Court shall maintain and operate the Existing Access Easement Areas as a private roadway, in good condition and repair, free of snow and ice and in compliance with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations. 4. In consideration for Buckland Court entering into this Easement Agreement, Berry Patch II will, at its cost(including, without limitation, site grading, asphalt,painting of parking lines and landscaping) construct up to ten(10)parking spaces located near the Gazebo on the Buckland Court Property, as shown on Exhibit E attached hereto. Such parking spaces shall be constructed in accordance with the following specifications: 8 inches of processed base and 3 inches of bituminous concrete. Such parking spaces will be completed on or before July 30, 2005. If Berry Patch II fails to substantially complete such parking spaces by then(subject to extension for force majeure and weather related delays) then Berry Patch II shall pay Buckland Court a liquidated damage in the amount of$100.00 per day for each day thereafter until the parking spaces are substantially complete. Once such parking spaces are constructed, Berry Patch II shall repair any damage done to the Buckland Court Property by such work and thereafter shall have no further obligations with respect thereto. If Berry Patch II fails to complete the parking spaces by July 30, 2005, then, in addition to the aforementioned liquidate damage amount, Buckland Court shall be entitled to exercise the remedies provided in Paragraph 9 below. 5. Buckland Court grants to Berry Patch II a perpetual right,privilege and easement for the purpose of(a) installing, constructing, altering,repairing, replacing and maintaining a sanitary sewer line or main through, under and across a portion of the Buckland Court Property being a strip of land ten feet (10')wide in the location shown as "10' sanitary sewer easement in favor of N/F Katten" on a map or plan entitled"Topographic Plan Prepared For Berry Patch II Grandview Terrace &Deming Street South Windsor, Connecticut Sheet 413/11 Date:11/04/03 Scale 1 inch=40 feet,prepared by Design Professionals, Inc, 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut" (such area being hereinafter referred to as the "Sewer Easement Area") and(b) connecting such line or main to an existing sanitary sewer line or main in the Buckland Court Property, in the location shown on said map or plan, together with the right to discharge C:\Documents and SettingsMendyMocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\O MAVillage At.$uckland Court Easement-clean.doc 12/7/04 G VOL. 167 4 PAGE 330 and flow sewerage from the Berry Patch II Property through such lines or mains. Berry Patch II shall, at its cost, maintain and repair all sewer lines or mains installed by Berry Patch II pursuant hereto. Buckland Court shall maintain and repair the sewer line or main in the Buckland Court Property through which sewerage will flow from Berry Patch II's lines or mains. Berry Patch II shall reimburse Buckland Court for 50% of the costs of such maintenance and repair, with respect to that portion of the sewer line or main that runs from the point of connection of the new line from the Berry Patch II Property to the existing sewer line, to Buckland Street. Buckland Court agrees that no structure shall be erected and no large trees that could interfere with the operation and maintenance of the sewer shall be planted within the Sewer Easement Area. Buckland Court agrees that it shall, to the extent necessary to effectuate the purpose of the sewer easement granted herein, grant a sewer easement to any governmental body that requires the same. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Berry Patch II shall have the right to assign the sewer easement granted herein to the Town of South Windsor. 6. Buckland Court grants to Berry Patch II temporary easements, for construction and repair purposes, to enter upon the portions of the Buckland Court Property that are adjacent to the New Access Easement Area and the Sewer Easement Area. Berry Patch II shall repair any damage to the Buckland Court Property that is caused by such construction or repair. 7. Buckland Court on the one hand, and Berry Patch and Berry Patch II on the other hand, shall each, for the mutual benefit and protection of itself and the other, maintain commercial general liability insurance, with a Contract Liability Endorsement, against claims for personal injury or death and property damage occurring upon, in or about the New Access Easement Area(as to Berry Patch and Berry Patch II) and the Sewer Easement Area(as to Berry Patch II) and the Existing Access Easement Areas (as to Buckland Court), such insurance to afford protection to the limit of not less than a combined single limit of$3 million per occurrence in respect of personal injury or death and property damage. Buckland Court, Berry Patch and Be Patch II shall each deliver to the oth er er certificates of insurance required �y q ed under this paragraph; the insurance maintained by Berry Patch and Berry Patch II shall name Buckland Court as an additional insured. 8. Berry Patch and Berry Patch II shall each defend, indemnify and hold Buckland Court harmless from and against any liability, losses, damages, costs and expenses suffered or incurred by Buckland Court as a result of the exercise of Berry Patch's or Berry Patch II's easement rights under this Easement Agreement, respectively. 9. If any party hereto fails to comply with any provision herein ("Defaulting Party") then any other party or its mortgagee ("Non-Defaulting Party") at its option and with thirty(30) days prior written notice may proceed to cure the default by the payment of money, performance of work, furnishing of services or other action for the account and at the sole cost and expense of the Defaulting Party, and in connection with such cure, the Non-Defaulting Party may enter upon any portion of the Defaulting Party's property. The aforesaid thirty (30) day notice period shall not be required if, using reasonable judgment, the Non-Defaulting Party deems that an emergency exists which requires immediate C:\Documents and SettingsMendyP\Local SettingsWemporary Internet Files\OLK47\Village At-$uckland Court Easement-clean.doc 12/7/04 J VOL. 1674PACE 331 cure. In the event of such emergency, the Non-Defaulting Party shall give whatever notice is reasonable to the Defaulting Party. Within thirty (30) days of demand therefor, the Defaulting Party shall reimburse the Non- Defaulting Party for any sums reasonably expended by the Non-Defaulting Party due to the default as provided above and for fees, costs and expenses incurred by the Non-Defaulting Parry in connection therewith, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees, together with interest at the rate of 12%per annum thereon. 10. All remedies and rights of either party hereunder are cumulative of each and every other right which a party may have at law and equity, and the exercise of one or more rights or remedies shall not prejudice or impair the concurrent or subsequent exercise of such other rights or remedies. 11. Any notices required to be given hereunder shall be sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivered, or sent by private overnight express carrier, to the parties set forth below or at such other address as either party may hereafter specify by notice to the other given in such manner: If to Berry Patch: Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership c/o The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 If to Berry Patch II: Berry Patch II Associates Limited Partnership c/o The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 If to Buckland Court: 432 Buckland Road South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 12. No waiver of any condition or legal right or remedy shall be implied by the failure of Buckland Court, Be Patch or Be Patch II to declare a breach,�'Y Berry each or for any other reason and no waiver of any condition or covenant shall be valid unless it be in writing and signed by the waiving party. 13. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as covenants running with each respective property. 14. It is further understood and agreed that neither party shall, in any event, be construed or held to be a partner or associate of the other in the conduct of its business, nor shall either party be liable for any debts incurred by the other in the conduct of its business. CADocuments and Settings\WendyMocal SettingsWempomry Internet FileAOLK47WHIage At Rockland Court Easement-clean.doc 4 - 12/7/04 VOL. 1674PmE 332 15. There are no representations, covenants, warranties,promises, agreement, conditions or undertakings, oral or written, between the parties hereto other than as herein set forth. No subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party hereto unless in writing and signed by it. 16. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which is held invalid or enforceable, should not be effected thereby, and each term and provision.of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the full extent permitted by law. 17. Nothing herein shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of, or any portion thereof to the general public, or for the general public or for any public use or purpose whatsoever; it being the intention and understanding of Buckland Court, Berry Patch and Berry Patch II that this Agreement shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed solely for the benefit of Buckland Court, Berry Patch and Berry Patch I1, and their successors and assigns. 18. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Connecticut. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Buckland Court, Berry Patch and Berry Patch II have hereunto set their hands as of the date first above written. Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership By: Berry Patch GP, LLC, General Partner In.� 4cao7�i Geoffre k Sa er Y Its Member Berry Patch II Associates Limited Partnership By: Berry Patch II GP, LLC, General Partner ��' 6,10 " Geoffrey Sag r Its Member G>F ,VbV, a;e a e ar n p J By. Robevzfi fin- Noon'&*') VrP. C:\Documents and SettingsMendyMocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK47\Village At@uckland Court Easement-clean.doc 12n104 J 1674PASE 333 Its STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) ss: COUNTY OF Ala'—Jk:Y ) Personally appeared the said Geoffrey W. Sager, Member of Berry Patch GP, LLC, General Partner of said Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said limited partnership, before me. nd - Notary blic My Commission Expires: STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss: COUNTY OF 6ko-170,kd ) Personally appeared the said Geoffrey W. Sager, Member of Berry Patch II GP, LLC, General Partner of Berry Patch II Associates Limited Partnership, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said limited partnership, before me. Notary Tublic My Commission Expires: � OF b-T-) ss: COUNTY OF NO"U� ) Personally appeared the said 90 eA �.. �061460 vFof Widsm SA 41, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of said 6-F 01y ASO 00 ty, before me. Notary Public , My Commission Expires: CADocuments and Settings\WendyMocal Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\0LK47\Vi11age Atauckland Court Easement-clean.doc 12/7/04 VOL. 1674PAGE 334 SCHEDULE A All those two certain pieces or parcels of land, together with all buildings and improvements thereon, situated on the easterly side of Buckland Road in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hanford and State of Connecticut,bounded and described as follows: PARCEL 1 A A certain piece or parcel of land,together with all buildings and improvements thereon, situated easterly of Euckland Road in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,being shown and designated as"Parcel IA"on a raqp entitled: "RESUBDIVISION MAP PREPARED FOR: THE VILLAGE AT BUCKLAND COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 43213UCKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT RESURVEY/PROPERTY SURVEY DESIGN: RA DRAWN: RA CHECKED: RPM JOB NO.: 98-1113 DATE: 9-30-1998 DRAWING NO.: 1113ST1'BA GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch= 100 ft.", which map was prepared by Design Professionals, Inc.,Civil Engineers,Planners, Surveyors GIS, 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 (the"Map'), which Map is on file in the Office of the South Windsor Town Clerk as Map No.2526, and to which map reference is hereby made and maybe had for a more particular description of the premises,which are bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point in the northeasterly line of land now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God,which point marks a southwesterly comer of the herein described premises and a southeasterly coruer of Parcel 2, as shown on said Map;thence running along the northeasterly line of said land now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God,the following courses, directions and distances: (1) S 74°58' 5T'E,468.71 feet to a point;and(2) S 76-28' 10"E,330.59 feet to a point which marks the southeasterly comer of the herein described premises, as shown on the Map; thence taming and running N 03"48' 46"W, along the westerly line of said Parcel 1,568.71 feet to a point in the southerly line of land now or formerly of Fred S. Fatten,which point marks the northeasterly comer of the herein described premises; thence turning and running along the southerly,southeasterly and easterly lines of land now or formerly of the said Pred S.Katten,the following courses,directions and distances: (1) N 85°29' 41"W, 612.92 feet to a point;(2)S 70'41' 12"W, 188.44 feet to a point marked by a monument, and (3) S 020 21' 57"W, 172.64 feet(I72.91 feet by deed)to a point,which point marks the northeasterly comer of Parcel 2; continue thence along the easterly,northerly and easterly again,lines of said Parcel 2, the following courses,directions and distances: (1) S 01° 09' 20"W, 107.54 feet(107.79 feet by deed)to a point; (2)S 86'56' 59"E, 67.50 feet to a point (said latter point being marked by a 1/2 inch iron pin located 1.62 feet south and 0.36 feet east of the corner); and(3) S 04°28' 30"W, 7I.09 feet to the point or place of beginning. VOL. 16 7 4 PAGE 3 3 PARCEL TWO A certain piece or parcel of land,together with all buildings and improvements thereon, situated on the easterly side of Buckland Road in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,being shown and designated as"Parcel 2" on a map entitled: "RESUBDIVISION MAP PREPARED FOR: THE VILLAGE AT BUCKLAND COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 432 BUCKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT RESURVEY/PROPERTY SURVEY DESIGN: RA DRAWN: RA CHECKED: PM JOB NO.: 98-1113 DATE: 9-30-1998 DRAWING NO.: 1113SITEA GRAPHIC SCALE I inch= 100 ft.",which map was prepared by Design Professionals,Inc., Civil Engineers,Planners, Surveyors GIS, 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 (the"Map"), which Map is on file in the Office of the South Windsor Town Clerk as Map INTo_ 2526,and to which map reference is hereby wade and may be had for a more particular description of the premises, which are bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point in the easterly line of Buckland Road,which point marks the northwesterly comer of the herein described premises and the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Fred S.):fatten; thence running N 84'04' 17"E, along the southerly line of land now or formerly of said Fred S.Katten, 193.49 feet to a point in the westerly line of Parcel 1A, which point inarks the northeasterly corner of the herein described premises; thence turning and running along the westerly,southerly and westerly, again,lines of said parcel 1 A,the following courses,directions and distances: (1) S 01°09' 20"W, 107.54 feet(107.79 feet by deed)to a point; (2) S 86'56' 59"E, 67.50 feet to a point(said latter point being marked by a 1/2 inch iron pipe situated 1.62 feet south and 0.36 feet east of the comer),and(3)S 040 28' 30"W,71.09 feet to a point which marks a southeasterly comer of the herein described premises; thence turning and running N 77° 17' 42"W,79.05 feet to apoint; thence turning and mn ing S 1 I°57' 20"W, 118.87 feet to a point,wluch point marks a southeasterly corner of the herein described premises; thence turning and running N 190 31' 16"W, 136.96 feet to apoint in the easterly line of Buckland Road;thence turning and running N 03'48' 46"W,along the easterly line of Bucklaud Road,236.52 feet to the paint or place of beginning. With respect to Parcel I and parcel Two reference is hereby made to a map entitled: "RESUBDIVISION MAP PREPARED FOR:VILLAGE AT SOUTH WINDSOR BUCKLAND ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT RESURVEY/PROPERTY SURVEY DESIGN: RA DRAWN: RA CHECKED: RJA JOB NO.: 98-1113 DATE: 9-2-98 DRAWING NO.: 1113sitea GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch=100 ft.REVISIONS NO. I DATE 9-15-98 NO. 2 DATE 9-24-98 NO. 3 10-20-98",which map was prepared by Design Professionals, Inc,,Civil Engineers,Planners, Surveyors GIS, 165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 (the"Map"),which Map is on file in the Office of the South Windsor Town Clerk as Map No.2517. • VOI. 16 7 4 PAGE 336 SAID PREMISES ARE CONVEYED SUBJECT TO: 1. Real Estate taxes due Town of South Windsor on the Grand list of October 1, 2003 and taxes and sewer use fees to become due to the Town of South Windsor thereafter. 2. As to Parcel Two, drainage easement and maintenance easement as contained in a Warranty Deed from Frank E. Ahearn, Trustee to the State of Connecticut dated October 8, 1992 and recorded in Volume 675 at Page 3 of the South Windsor Land Records. 3. As to Parcel Two, a Sewer Line Easement from The Village at Buckland Court, L.L.P.,to Fred S. Katten dated September 24, 2002 and recorded in Volume 1357 at page 355 pf the South Windsor Land Records. 4. Multifamily Open-End Mortgage,Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement from The Village at Buckland Court Limited Partnership to Glaser Financial Group, Inc., to secure the principal payment of$11,200,000.00 dated October 15, 2002 and recorded October 21, 2002 in Volume 1368 at Page 107 of the South Windsor Land Records,which mortgage was assigned to Fannie Mae by Assignment dated October 15, 2002 and recorded in Volume 1368 at Page 173 of the South Windsor Land Records, which mortgage the Grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay. 5. An Assignment of Leases and Rents from The Village at Buckland Court Limited Partnership to Glaser Financial Group, Inc., dated October 15, 2002 and recorded October 21, 2002 in Volume 1368 at Page 162 of the South Windsor Land Records, which was assigned to Fannie Mae by Assignment of Leases and Rents dated October 15, 2002 and recorded in Volume 1368 at Page 177 of the South Windsor Land Records, which Assignment of Leases and Rents have been assigned to the Grantee. 6. A UCC Financial Statement with The Village at Buckland Court Limited Partnership, as debtor, and Glaser Financial Group, Inc., as secured party, and Fannie Mae as Assignee of secured party,recorded in Volume 1368 at Page 181 of the South Windsor Land Records,which Grantee is now Assignee of secured party. 756203.1 va. 1 b 7 4 PAGE 337 EXHIBIT B A certain piece or parcel of land situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut shown on a map or plan entitled"Perimeter Survey ALTA/ACSM Survey Resurvey Prepared For: Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership 205 Oakland Road South Windsor, Connecticut Date: 11/03/03, Revised to 11/10/03 scale 1 inch= 50 ft., prepared by Design Professionals, Inc." which map or plan is to be filed in the office of the South Windsor Town Clerk and which piece or parcel of land is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marked by a drill hole in brownstone in the apparent general southwesterly line of Oakland Road a/k/a Connecticut Route 30 which point marks a Northwesterly corner of the premises herein described and a Northeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Pauline G. Johnson; thence, S. 37' 11' 46"W., a distance of 147.46 feet to a brownstone; thence continuing along said Johnson,N. 45' 51' 28" W., a distance of 119.61 feet to a concrete monument; thence continuing along said Johnson, S. 39' 34' 11" W., a distance of 179.98 feet to a granite monument; thence continuing along said Johnson and land now or formerly of Anton Simler, Jr., in part on each,N. 61'31' 5 1" W., in all, a distance of 293.72 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 52' 09' 44"W., along line of said Simler, a distance of 108.86 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 76' 58' 41" W., still along line of land of said Simler, a distance of 70.51 feet to a point; thence N. 89' 13' 59" W., still along line of said Simler, a distance,of 216.28 feet to a granite monument; thence continuing along line of land now or formerly of Fred S. Katten, N. 85'29' 41" W., a distance of 114.91 feet to a point; thence S. 03'48' 46" E., along line of land now or formerly The Village at Buckland Court, Limited Partnership, a distance of 568.71 feet to a point; thence S. 76' 28' 10"E., along property now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, a distance of 10.97 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 76' 17' 19" E., along line of said Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, land now or formerly of Robert N. &Am L. Gamache and land now r y o formerly of Karen A. &Edward J. O'Connor, in part on each, in all a distance of 696.49 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing S. 73' 59' 02"E., along land now or formerly of Robert&Penelope P. Torrani and land now or formerly of Michael J. and Kristina G. Suppicich, in part on each, in all a distance of 621.53 feet to an iron pin in line of Felt Road; thence,N. 21' 13' 25" E., along Felt Road, a distance of 95.98 feet to and iron pin; thence,N. 68'45' 26" W., along line of land now or formerly of Lois H. Petersen, a distance of 182.82 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 42' 17' 02" W., still along line of said Petersen, a distance of 489.28 feet to a concrete monument; thence N. 37'39' 09"E., still along line of land of said Petersen, a distance of 355.51 feet to a broken monument in line of said Oakland Road; thence N. 42' 14' 34" W., along Oakland Road, a distance of 61.78 feet to the drill hole in a brownstone monument which marks the point and place of beginning. Said parcel contains 14.01 acres of land, more or less. C:\Documents and SettingsMendyMocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK47MIlage At Buckland Court Easement-clean.doc I2/7/04 va. 167L PAoE 338 EXHIBIT C Beginning at a point at the northwest corner of the property herein described, said point being east of the easterly highway line of Buckland Road and being further described as an iron pin; thence N 79°-20'-46"E, along property now or formerly of Dennis C. & Sharon E. Platt, a distance of 176.07 feet to a merestone; thence N 03°-11'- 09"W, along property now or formerly of Dennis C. & Sharon E. Platt, a distance of 126.31 feet to a 1 inch pin; thence N 78°-43'-09"E, along property now or formerly of The Grillo Family Limited Partnership, a distance of 104.89 feet to a merestone; thence N 24°-45'-17"W, along property now or formerly of The Grillo Family Limited Partnership, a distance of 77.46 feet to a merestone; thence N 42°-25'-33"E, along property now or formerly of The Grillo Family Limited Partnership and property now or formerly of Harold L. Dodd,partly by each, in all a distance of 149.52 feet to a merestone with a drill hole; thence S 76°-20'-14"E, along property now or formerly of DEW Properties LLC and property now or formerly of Marian & Teresa Malyszczycki, partly by each, in all a distance of 677.63 feet to an 3/4 inch I.P.; thence S 690-27'-19"E, along property now or formerly of Marian& Teresa Malyszczycki, a distance of 103.71 feet to an I.P.; thence S 03°-37'-15"E, along property now or formerly of Mildred S. Lu & Kenneth Simler, a distance of 484.91 feet to a granite monument with a drill hole; thence N 85°-29'-41" W, along property now or formerly of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, a distance of 112.88 feet to an I.P.; thence S 03°-48'-46"E, along property now or formerly of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, a distance of 569.04 feet to an I.P.; thence S 76°-28'-10"E, along property now or formerly of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, a distance of 8.87 feet to an I.P.; thence S 76°-17'- 19"E, along property now or formerly of Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership, a distance of 403.21 feet to an I.P.; thence S 17°-29'-17"W, along property now or formerly of Gregory & Michelle Bassos, a distance of 415.00 feet to an I.P.; thence N 730-4l'-07"W, along property now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, a distance of 490.36 feet to an I.P.; thence N 05°-51'-28" W, along property now or formerly of Calvary Church of the Assemblies of God, a distance of 415.00 feet to an I.P.; thence S 76°-28'-10"E, along property now or formerly of the Village at Buckland Court Limited Partnership, a distance of 242.01 feet to an I.P.; thence N 03°-48'-46"W, a distance of 568.71 feet to an I.P.; thence S 85°-29'-41"E, a distance of 612.92 feet to an I.P.; thence S 70°-41'-12" W, a distance of 188.44 feet to a monument; thence S 02°-21'- 58"W, a distance of 172.64 feet to a granite monument with a drill hole; thence S 84°- 04'-17" W, a distance of 179.48 feet to an I.P. with the last five courses being along property now or formerly of the Village at Buckland Court Limited Partnership; thence N 03°-48'-46"W, along property now or formerly of the Town of South Windsor, a distance of 517.83 feet to an I.P., said iron pin being the point and place of beginning. CADocuments and Settings\WendyP\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK47WHIage At Buckland Court Easement-clean.doc 12/7/04 EXHIBIT D vGt. 1 6 7 4 PAGE 339 411A --------------- r r 51--33 r //r• l ti 1 r f It 34 11-777. i � t t E tBIT-E 74PAGE 119A Cr ID 1111 _-b >qJ&4 T) 12 119 kn C PB. I x Pil 119.7 *0 A W 44 rqy 95 A Jkp,P TD J16i LA, X104.9 CJ �I N i-�A 7 rJ I" 4"t 1,4 L lit. M7 'vVA L. 07. 9.5 4. 0.7 _j SAWC-UT EXISTING m -612 U�2 gym_ r PAVEMENT AT CCLIMBZ014 L FLAG xu9A \1 V TF s �5OLr' XU9;8 INV 1;0:5 .y. ML .0 ``V/- 70 "(.0 117, r U2.2 xugs Pi PROPOSED SILT FENCE\ noposEc 110 r5- X113-t- CONCRETE WALK M09.4 9�- I IS7 11,9,4 M5 S..5 N PROPr')S— 1144,1k Im.8 IOU7) x lat PARKING 5PA C,F.S N114-4 X119.4 PROPOSED 4' 91DEWALK .7 xtl?.o L 7 X31169 JQ Ile- T Ale.' 12,--.s INV 11 FAVI IM ca IKV 11 4XI(N&E; lit-3a 13, RECEIVED FOR RECORD, [SATE L12411 114TIME M- it nr._ TOWN!—CLERK. SOUTH VVINVIOR"et N TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE& SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON KQ Y r) T al 1C('wood Phone No.91, J",�I bib" Address er n fr ion ( CJ i �W err CT �y Site Name yr P&Z No. 0—E53 ` Owner Q Phone No. —9LAQ Contractor o 'Orl Signature of Owner Date: Z Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location nd atu: change. Include ; Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) r i rNa4e- d r Iv o v s+ -rr �, rid Q Reason for Change: (Why is change required) c 0� - i a APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning d' Date: i ; Town Engineer 7: %' ; Date: j 1<f/t., Dir. of Public Woks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department a t STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Commissioner of Public Safety •t„°' 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE P.O. BOX 317546 � Commissioner of Motor Vehicles NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546 Phone: (860)594-3020 December 22, 2004 Mr. Goeffrey- Sager DEC 2i g 2004 Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Dear Mr. Sager: Subject: Town of South Windsor Berry Patch Adult Living Community Enclosed is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0411-01 approved at the December 21, 2004 meeting of the State Traffic Commission, detailing conditions for the issuance of a Certificate. In accordance with Section 14-311 of the General Statutes, a building/ foundation permit cannot be obtained from the Town until a certificate is issued. A certificate will not be issued by this office until: 1. the Traffic Investigation Report has been recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with Condition No. 9; 2 . a bond, sufficient to cover the full cost of implementing the required improvements, has been posted with the Department of Transportation District No. I Office (Attn: David A. Sawicki) at 1107 Cromwell Avenue in the Town of Rocky Hill, CT 06067, (860) 258-4502, as noted in Condition No. 8; and 3 . this office has been notified of the above. Additionally, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the District Office prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. The approval will expire on December 20, 2006, unless all the requirements are satisfied. Very truly yours, n Robbin L. Cabelus Executive Director Enclosures CC: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Christopher Dougan - Please confirm certificate issuance with STC. Planning and ZoaLgcL Commission Mr. Ted J. DeSantos, P.E. , PTOE •-: � Mr. Lyle Wray . b Yj •.. An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled or recovered paper M4-10 REV 1/97 Report By: MSM Date: 12/04 STATE OFCONNECTICUT STC No: 132-0411-01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Checked By: JGB Date: 12/04 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc. No: REPORT TO THE See Previous Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 STATE TRAFFIC COM USSION Approved By STC - Town of South Windsor Date: DEC" 2 1 Requested By: Location: Route 30 (Oakland Road)at Berry Patch Associated Drive to Berry Patch Adult Living Limited Partnership Community How Requested: Letter Date: November 3,2004 Certificate EXECUTIVE]DIRECTOR Not Issued Recommendation: In accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as revised, it is recommended that the State Traffic Commission (STC:) issue a certificafe to Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership for Berry-Patch Adult Living Community, 198 residential units and a 13,012 square foot clubhouse with a total of 253 parking spaces, located on Route 30 (Oakland Road) in the Town of.South Windsor, stating that the operation thereof will not imperil the safety of the public based on the following conditions: The requirements are based on and referenced to the following plans: A. `Berry Patch I &11 Layout,"Scale 1"=200'. B. "Berry Patch Associated Limited Partnership, Site Drive Concept 2, Berry Patch Adult Housing Expansion, South Windsor, Connecticut," Fig. 1, prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. dated November 2004. 1. That Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 be rescinded. . 2. That the owner construct a right-turn in only drive on Route 30 (Oakland Road) in substantial conformance with the above-referenced plans. 3. That the site driveway on Felt Road be constructed in substantial conformance with the referenced plans. 4. That signs and pavement markings on Route 30 be installed by the applicant in substantial conformance with the referenced plan, and in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" latest edition. The applicant will be responsible to maintain signs and pavement markings on the site drives. 5. That an encroachment permit be obtained from the Department of Transportation's District 1 office prior to performing any worn within the State highway right-of-way. The peiTnit forms must include the applicable detailed construction plans. ff 'B Division of Tra c Engineering Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations 1 Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Berry Patch Adult Living Community Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0411-01 Berry Patch Adult Living Community is a 198 unit, age-restricted residential development located on the west side of Route 30, approximately 1,250 feet north of the Felt Road Ext. intersection in the Town of South Windsor. Two stop controlled access drives were proposed to be constructed on Felt Road and Route 30. The development was approved July 20,2004 and a certificate has not been issued. At this time, the developer proposes to construct a right-turn entrance only drive, in lieu of the approved full access drive on Route 30. The request to redesign this drive is due to the inability to acquire easements from an adjacent property owner: Since this drive will be limited to right-turn entrance only, widening for a westbound left-turn bypass area and roadway overlay will not be required on Route 30. Also, intersection sight distance along Route 30 and the associated easements will not be required. The bond amount will be reduced to correspond to a reduction of work within the State right-of-way. Traffic Generation: It is anticipated that the modifications to the proposed drive and the redistribution of site-generated traffic will have no significant impact to the surrounding area. Conclusion: Based on the above, it is recommended that the revised drive on Route 30 be approved as shown on the above-referenced plan. 3 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS �. STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Commissioner of Public safety )tYtf 1.�JY 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE P.O. BOX 317546 Commissioner of Motor Vehicles NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546 Phone: (860)594-3020 January 28, 2005 Mr. Geoffrey Sager JA N 3 1 2005 Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Dear Mr. Sager: Subject: Town of South Windsor Berry Patch Adult Living Community We have been advised that a bond has been posted with the Department of Transportation's District No. I Office for the above development, and a copy of the recorded Traffic Investigation Report has been forwarded to us. In accordance with Condition Nos. 8 and 9 of Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0411-01 approved at the December 21, 2004 meeting of the State Traffic Commission (STC) , enclosed is Certificate No. 1627. The Certificate will expire two (2) years from the approval date of the aforementioned report unless all conditions and requirements are complied with within that period or permission is requested and obtained from the STC to extend the expiration date. An encroachment permit must be obtained from the Department of Transportation's District Office prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. Operation of any portion of the expansion of the facility is prohibited until all conditions of the Certificate have been satisfied, unless permission to do so has been granted by the STC. The Certificate may now be filed on the land records, to satisfy Condition No. 9, in accordance with. the enclosed procedures. Very truly yours, r1 Robbin L. Cabelus Executive Director Enclosures CC: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Christopher Dougan - Please see Paragraph No. 3. Planning and Zoning Commission Mr. Ted J. DeSantos, P.E. Mr. Lyle Wray 44 An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled or recovered paper STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Commissioner of Public Safety w'•••t+•< °` 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546 Commissioner of Motor vehicles NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546 Phone: (860)594-3020 CERTIFICATE NO. 1627 STC NO. 132-0411-01 APPROVED December 21, 2004 EXPIRES December 20, 2006 ISSUED TO: Berry Patch Associates LP 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 FOR: Berry Patch Adult Living Community Route 30 Town of South Windsor pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised, and the Regulations of the State Traffic Commission. The applicant is hereby ordered to comply with the conditions and requirements as set forth in the attached report and plan(s) . Failure to comply with all conditions and requirements will constitute sufficient basis for revocation of the Certificate. NO PERSON SHALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THEREOF UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ABOVE UNLESS PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO OPERATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE WILL EXPIRE TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE APPROVAL DATE OF. THE ATTACHED REPORT UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION IS REQUESTED AND OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE. Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety. - Robbin L. Cabelus Executive Director January 27, 2005 Date An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled or recovered paper r' TRA-10 REV 1/97 Report By: MSM Date: 12/04 STATE OF CONNECTICUT STC No: 132-0411-01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _Checked By: JGB Date: 12/04 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc. No: REPORT TO THE See Previous Traffic Investigation Report STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Approved By STC No. 132-0402-01 DEC 2 1 Town of South Windsor Date: 20 Requested By: Location: Route 30 (Oakland Road)at Berry Patch Associated Drive to Berry Patch Adult Living Limited Partnership Community ,- How Requested: Letter h Date: November 3,2004 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Recommendation: In accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as revised,it is recommended that the State Traffic Commission (STC)issue a certificate to Berry Patch Associates Limited Partnership for Berry Patch Adult Living Community, 198 residential units and a 13,012 square foot clubhouse with a total of 263 parking spaces, located on Route 30 (Oakland Road) in the Town of South Windsor, stating that the operation thereof will not imperil the safety of the public based on the following conditions: The requirements are based on and referenced to the following plans: A. "Berry Patch I&II Layout," Scale 1"=200'. B. "Berry Patch Associated Limited Partnership, Site Drive Concept 2, Berry Patch Adult Housing Expansion, South. Windsor, Connecticut," Fig. 1, prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. dated November 2004. 1. That Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0402-01 be rescinded. 2. That the owner construct a right-turn in only drive on Route 30 (Oakland Road)in substantial conformance with the above-referenced plans. 3. That the site driveway on Felt Road be constructed in substantial conformance with the referenced plans. 4. That signs and pavement markings on Route 30 be installed by the applicant in substantial conformance with the referenced plan, and in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" latest edition. The applicant will be responsible to maintain signs and pavement markings on the site drives. 5. That an encroachment permit be obtained from the Department of Transportation's District 1 office prior to performing any work within the State highway right-of-way. The permit forms must include the applicable detailed construction plans. By Division of Traffic Engineering Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations 1 Town of South Windsor Route 30 (Oakland Road)at Drive to Berry Patch Adult Living Community Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0411-01 6. That all work on roadways that are owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in conformance with the standards and specifications of the town. 7. That all roadway and drainage improvements within the State's right-of-way be subject to review by the Department of Transportation and all their requirements including those pertaining to maintenance and protection of traffic be satisfied prior to the issuance of a permit for work within the right-of-way. 8. That prior to the issuance of a certificate, the applicant post and maintain a bond in the amount of $10,000 to cover the costs of satisfying the conditions of this report. Upon submission of the final design plans, the dollar amount of this bond may be adjusted either upward or downward during the encroachment permit review process. 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate, a copy of this report be recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with the attached procedure. A copy of the Certificate shall be recorded on the land records upon issuance. 10. That the STC reserves the right to require additional improvements or changes, as deemed necessary, due to the development's traffic in the future. The cost of any additional improvements or changes shall be borne by the owner of the development. Mr. Ted DeSantos, P.E., the applicant's authorized representative, concurred with all the above recommendations, except for Condition No. 10 on December 6,2004. Chief Gary K. Tyler, the Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, concurred with the above recommendations on December 6,2004. 2 Report of Findings Town of South Windsor Berry Patch Adult Living Community Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-0411-01 Berry Patch Adult Living Community is a 198 unit, age-restricted residential development located on the west side of Route 30, approximately 1,250 feet north of the Felt Road Ext. intersection in the Town of South Windsor. Two stop controlled access drives were proposed to be constructed on Felt Road and Route 30. The development was approved July 20,2004 and a certificate has not been issued. At this time, the developer proposes to construct a right-turn entrance only drive, in lieu of the approved full access drive on Route 30. The request to redesign this drive is due to the inability to acquire easements from an adjacent property owner. Since this drive will be limited to right-turn entrance only, widening for a westbound left-turn bypass area and roadway overlay will not be required on Route 30. Also, intersection sight distance along Route 30 and the associated easements will not be required. The bond amount will be reduced to correspond to a reduction of work within the State right-of-way. Traffic Generation: It is anticipated that the modifications to the proposed drive and the redistribution of site-generated traffic will have no significant impact to the surrounding area. Conclusion: Based on the above, it is recommended that the.revised drive on Route 30 be approved as shown on the above-referenced plan. 3 A 77777 r TOWN alf SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANCE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION _GENERAL: e CHANGE'ORDER CONTACT PERSON VA90j. �A �00. Phone ISS 4 . Address A-iyt t 1 T"+Er W Nit w' Site Name K/ pATcti -x w. "y P&Z No. 03-9-:kP OwnerlX �� �tl P Phone NO. 04 Contractor r?')E � 77 Signature of Owner Date: y Signature. of Design Eng Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and ature of change. Include Four �4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) 1 T/0 Or At w 3�So� 3tv+5tri i E 4, I Reason for Change: . (Why is change required All APPROVALS.: (As Require. ) . Dir. Of Planning Date: 0(� Town -Engineer , "Date: . ali l { Dir. of Public rks' Date t Other:. Date: . STAFF COMMENTS: 4-1 qnw& P r�U SP w A C ude Al 0 Ad White - Town Engineer Yellow- Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod.- Engineering Department x.- s i ' :kt'.t;`'� '>� IC6 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON) jSyC-, A , Phone No.291-27-% Address Q PS 16!5 C-T- Site Name_ feelky PAT[.,+ ir , P&Z No. 0_j -- � Owner_ Mr_ mC-,iP_Z &aL711 6JOUR L-M. Phone No. (01-_9 4n Contractor MMO DONS?QULTjutj Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Eng Date: CHANGE: (Describe location a d atu of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) _ Lmoc A-_rc 9 SANI Efts I M 11 t J I i PAaaSa M&tAC )�&VWG b ITi A-QL , Reason for Change: (Why is change required) A T"U V 1 L1&rS APPROVALS: (As Required) fir ...... Dir. Of Planningl Date: Town Engineer 4 Date: /J Dir. of Public orks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department TOT$N OF SOUTH WINDSOR' STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON TLA 0y SGH LEI L F, Phone No.86D-211-8755 Address 16S .SOt4TH s.Q L1.#rE X0 DES14tij PRDF9S51bAlAL..5, I nJG .Powrm WiMbgz, . cr D6n74} Site Name ip©D- I bD(�. 51IL-LA VAN AVE. P&Z No. *Q 4 �bdP Owner_ S C.0 TT [.. E r NA K D Phone No. 860-721- 9214 ContractorAA/14LL1 SCAIS crA17-AG?: l RAD DowNEY Signature of Owner Date: ylh24 Signature of Design E g Date: �T-4-�'(1� CHANGE: (Describe location n a ur of change. Include '. Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of; Change. ) MOD1FY ATH 1.5LAUD FQDM 4 f'EEr tn11P>r 7!5 r:F_E'r wl >E, w f�' b V E' G t4 R Q jQ id? o hl r F D O T -re t�A l n17'A t nl l.�J 1 DTH l� DR 1 V E- 7 H K IA LANE A AZ P AY- PA SS LA Iy jC. n �1 x F• _. Reason for Change: (Why is change required) b AccbmhjovA-rE A.TM ON lsL.AND. APPROVALS: (As Required) f� <; Dir. Of Planning ' a .0 Date: Town Engineer iuM Date: il j4d Dir. of Public Wo s Date: Other: Date: , STAFF COMMENTS: RECEEy MAY 2UU5 White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant SOUTH PLAWid`vG LrrT, Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering -Department t , EXISTING 10' t E>aSTWG 1 i SAN./STORM t 7m tN EASEMENT i ` .... 1} ---------- ------- -------- -------- ..........-------------t ........ ........ ----...............-.. -------- ......-----------...... -------r ........ --- + I LP1 132 e I , 22.0 36 _ - - - P OSED Y ASS 6 PROPOSED DUMPS BANE SIGN PROP. 1006® PAD (SEE AREA ON p°N L) �` N/F SCO TT LEDNAR WHITE LINE PROPOSED SOLI —1 + CONC.` , BOLL ' PCB1 12/6' 9� 5 J�'�. TF:129. + + PROPOSED INV(1 :125.75 55 LF 25 . 59 O" DRIVE _ ` I I LANE IGN (6"):126.50 Lp' 134 VA (TYP.) _ 26 LFN , C.O. 11 / PR P. 0.5%IN :128.901 MID.) 3.5' G TE p C.o.�&�D'TP-5 LP PR P. o (TYP.) o ♦I 11 3.0' DO R `� 0 7 LF-6" PERF. HOPE PIPE @ a ` 5. 'A PROPS=O.5% (MIN.) o _ J o 1 7.75 f - - - © -� - CONE PAD 51 LF - o 12" HDPE �'p6+ 11 - ( ) _ a� rx� 1000 SULLIVAN AVENUE' 47% INV. 2!7.35 o I 11 PERF. �3 PROPOSED BANK HOPEE PIPE EAlST 11 z1 2.955 SF S-0.52 (MIN.) , FENCE POST t1 ' p I ' .``FF:131.40 ��0� bryry� LP2/ N. ima ® 0 •� ' 2.8 � \Q�, o oho• 1 o Q Qc,LP o ROOF OVERHANG 3.0 CANOPY co OR / 1 Z 8.0 1� O d6i - 4 ��Q TIN 11 , ���0� INV:127.4O 00 ��o��r ' C.O. / �� ��' �``'� eA it 1,jp (TYP.) n ROP. GRE TRAP / FA o 11 PROPOSED iP-6 +p / e* TF. 130INV. 126.50 C DO NOT \s�. IN . OUT-126.25 ENTER SIGN DETAIL) ONE WAY ?J $r�, . 1 11 DO NOT ENTER PROPOSED <� NO RIGHT 11 ' TURN SIGN , C.O. (TYP.) 11 4L, INV:128.5O o 16 LF - 94 7' LAY STOPS $ �� 6" PVC AbR 35 21v - - - - -0 --••-- ---- � .CJ .�11 \ � � NOTE iS vim. RECEIVED40 RECEIVED AUG 0 4 2005 AUG 0 3 2005 s©urH ����iraDsoR P LAMING DEBT. -MeS"N FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers Other Offices: SOUTH WINDSOR 3 Trumbull,Connecticut 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040 North Palm Beach,Florida Greenville,North Carolina TEL 66o 646-2469 FAX 860 533-5143 West Springfield,Massachusetts Providence,Rhode Island INTERNET:www.fussandoneill.com Albany,New York Columbia,South Carolina x July 29, 2005 :f s = tl Ms.Robbin Cabelus Executive Director Tate Traffe Commission Conneefciit Department of Transportation 32800 Berlin Turnpike,Room 3119 P.O. Box 317546 4E Newington, CT 06131-7546 RE: STC Certificate Revision to Conditions of Approval Berry Patch Adult Living Community Route 30 South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Ms. Cabelus: Please find the enclosed information regarding the change in access for the major traffic generator certificate for the Berry Patch Adult Living Community in South Windsor, Connecticut (STC Certificate No. 1627.) We request that this item be added to the agenda of the next scheduled meeting of the State Traffic Commission. Under the conditions of the current certificate, the site drive on Route 30 (Oakland Road)is to be right-turn in only. Previous discussions with the Division of Traffic have indicated that in order for the Department to approve full access to the site at this location, the owner, Berry Patch Limited Partnership, would be required to provide. bypass width on Route 30 for left turning vehicles and demonstrate that intersection sight distance requirements, as described in the CDOT Highway Design Manual, are met. At the time the original certificate was issued, the owner decided to forego full access due to the cost of the required improvements on Route 30 and the refusal by the owner of the property west of the site driveway to grant an easement for sight line. There is an ongoing development on the adjacent parcel to the east of the site driveway, Wentworth Park.The owner of this parcel,Generation2,currently has an Encroachment Permit application under District review. As a condition of the permit,Generation2 is to install a bypass area for left turns into Wentworth Park. Berry Patch Limited Partnership and Generation2 have reached an agreement to share. cost of installing the bypass area on Route 30. The proposed plan would combine G:\P97\97146\A78\STC REVISION REQUEST.DOC . Corres.(HQ) 003 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers previously reviewed plans by extending the bypass width to include the frontage ofboth parcels. They have also reached an agreement to grant Berry Patch Limited Partnership an easement for sight line in the easterly direction. The adjacent property owner to the west still refuses to grant an easement for sight line, but because of the agreements with Generation2,Berry Patch Limited Partnership has reconsidered the installation of a full access driveway to Route 30 and requests that the conditions of the current certificate be amended to'allow full access. The existing sightline in the westerly direction is approximated at 1,200 feet. The posted speed limit along Route 30 in this section is 40 mph. Figure 11-2C of the Highway Design Manual lists the design intersection sight distance for a passenger car, entering a two-lane highway or street with a design speed of 45 mph, as 500 feet. The distance for a Semi-trailer is 765 feet. As confirmed by the enclosed photograph,there is more than sufficient sight distance to meet the requirements of the Highway Design Manual and there are currently no plans to place or construct anything that might obstruct or obscure the sight line. To aid in the review of this request we have enclosed the following: • 9 copies of a photo of the available sight line in the westerly direction • 9 copies of the plan for the proposed bypass for Wentworth Park on Route 30, currently under District Review • 9 copies of the plan for the proposed bypass for Berry Patch Adult Living Community showing a full access driveway on Route 30 previously reviewed by the Department We trust this information will be sufficient for your review. However, if you should. require any clarification or additional information,please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Kevin Conroy,P.E. Project Manager Enclosures C GarY K. Tyler,ler, Chief of Police, Legal Traffic Authority, Town of South Windsor Y Geoff Sager,Metro Realty Group GAP97\97146\A78\STC REVISION REQUEST.DOC Corres.(HQ) t� I - I, t �I f 7 ro--"-'—.:......�. �: � �� '��• ��'Y�;r,:;,� y �,d' a,� •.r^� �.F.yf'f �if 4«� • ,p�.iRb�f ' � i --•� � w" � y ;.b< �' ''r.«,�,+c».r.. rY'.�w" i+v�Jr. .�!�],��5'+,.Y.�`�� C gee,., , !.`'d'1r 'a'""":�1:t,,��L '2'r M"'C1 4 s'�TnwFnb kp`al a:, >' M✓ c.J � I ,,} �4r � � ��.''•,.�''�ah�':„�1L�F�+"w•wy' Ilrw.: � ,°'..: ,xW �;4 .y'trrk,,r.ry wJ'+ r t,,' 'y u3y i .y: r:"�u a�. 44 r+•,, f r.:, 1 :� y �?o,h"i7..'Fvy' q ,�f r h� I `a t y k a •y,,:�.l„'+Sw y r`�i t Y �� �• ' nka^ I ) f �+ y:v., i, v, ,z a.>rs; 4�y�wr�� >t off: L � C''.•,w .� i .::. ... ., .'.,:: .-, .... ,., t „":'r•., 4..; ��!.l ;i..a d^r .fit. J �r 1 lA �I MU, ,t'�� 'u fi'sri... _,. ...: r ..t::. .:'�'J, ::.,:::,°. ,. v..,v, ,., , ., ,r,.`� 'r:e,YG,✓rPbt ., :,- .: a,. .,,. r.• ,. ,: r..l. rS, :.'y w,,.,.,��s ,I:i ...,1*r, r � a I�`^c! J v t a..,:. _,,.. ,. ...•.. ,..,_ .,.,.-,,. :,,.. :•:, ....^.. ,.r „:, ,. ,.., kt, ! .;h• a ° ,..t,.. 'w+° ,1 0 .R�ti +v. �, ,1� ,�a r t xgM.i. :',;.i -. : � '1*,, v. r :v,.y; ;,. :,. 4 4." ,.;},t,i..e,4 ;av?e.N1.riF�,�' +,',.'; , ,J K W ra��* :a d.:,ra 1?✓ r ,.I r"� d..Sa..'S A; -. ,., a,... ,' r <>.. r.. , ,c':-a �'q. :a �"�' u•4>r84��.:, e r r�x7>,h .as. p�'• .,, 41 r y , :. r.:;'. -.. .•,.�- ,.: ,�f:¢.' .,... j.x:;` at �v,:'*'� : }.. �at i. a ., � 4.w>,..A,�4: S :;'. FrL^r, '> a '., '`� ;7;" �k �.t...,, ar:: d •.t a>o-i h ,,,«., s^, k`" +d�u J �+� „�•?� ��r,.,w ur.,?a' k,: w o r.�:',,. I,ti"' ,,,7,� :SS.b b a: ago-" .„A '.�aT" ..�,.,'': $c ^•+.. •rr.' r rma %1A +,'4„v.y`a .: ., , :.: .. .:.. . ...:.. •..<`C"f ,.;,'::,, .W.:." ,,, �yy J V,wy m^" #'"ror"sn:',,..: v,'w`',a;+'md .w.'+;., ,.•.,:;,. ..,;:..,.r .:.: ., ... ,'�: .n..,: ,.,,,,:.,. . .., ....� 's,..aF,,...c + .6_' pp'S� _ Tro' ��.+,'^''' EiY�"� ,�,�?' it'. '� .,>.a<.vr ,,t r.;. - '�` t" `.i.� b/ P r:. �Sk�t'r '",,:; "f'qp ,{�?'�yf Aa•vs.+rM ,1. �a.J.t,uz.t� 2 `,° v f' `�i ,' ', �:,, '.. .:.. Myt ....w+" I3 •4 d tii� � ,.Yf'��t,•C1'. fi!, �j,:�1. - %1 t .a3ia..�`'.r y ,T+r+y S+tw,r..Ap•1�t,.�t^aAar,?' .,,c^�'�e '✓e '>:�,t} �.✓C: i w ':x M '� z y .e; .,. » ,.,,.y. s „ r. .«. ;., ., 't::- _r,h/„- hW✓ �� ,f 1 r i 4 .�;tr.,:yA aS''? t .:;- .�,:': -• ,...- .•' � ., :,.;+, , - .,:, -. r� ..,.,.,. A :.a.,r. :, _,.. ,x.,, 'ya,h,.r, ; �':mb�t �:q.,r� wi., °-"v .w'.,rt�, t ,t �'y l,,,� .y,y ,:�,: ) t. �..•..'.A.: ...., ... �, ,. 1. r.:,.. ,....y: �., � ).i. ..,. .,..,. -...^ PY'.1w•:'V: 'a.f' J ,,,4. ^M9Y,,i' G.. I.b4''u 1 k �.'�'�;3:.. ',:i1.'. ), , 'L'.,s.,c '� .1, e, r.,q., �•'�!Y.., 9- .«* a t.,;y. 4 �, F,.1- a.s. .w,C:. ... ...... .. .. �.:tw•-r.. K6 ,!, n .. .. :::�i,» T a ..°'�` r,..:. > ".�v.. 'r�^ a SY'1p.' N.Wr .a'( # W+>' .•r,;,. .r. `,91.tI:S�:4` rY ,v ,.�`.i,,, 'f-".' :. ., ,:•; :,:.,;.,,. ,, .. ,..�, .,..:. .;':�v ";wsl o„'`b:. ;- :� 4xmvJ ,,Y• c;.. :r. n. '� J' �3';Y, J, P:�gr3 .:r.:, ,. ... ..':,; .:. ,'.. w ... _..._. r, '..?.,,,.,. Y.+.:,.S4.M ).n'.; .. •.7 lL I y,. .., ' � '., b•n' !IS :1:.:. F�,_'�#'�'V'd. , �'.:. ,-..„ .. .r.,�. •:;..,.,µ i :r?+- ,a,4 stir: r v'�,e .�::•7'F ;cf'w ., wh t 7.claw v .g^g✓,�'.+ ` AIµ. .� ,.�" qy to a,,,�,rG: u'w+'� l ��i 'I °,6 -,;�. ylf, 'r, -iti`.:. '`'Ag •,d a r,. ..,.,.a!,+° wv.„ u:+ -,w,,, .:,. :.ar, .. �: ...... .tws'. .(,.o �� � Yik' ^� �•«:: i+ 1..,.:. .t ..,. ,... ,.. ... e. , ._ ,....,, 4>.,,rr,,,r. a< .„ .:.. t..,rt. d»,„ r 3'S ,,,+, Fete.., •w �,. .,> 'r^y' .`�1.u: s f �-"'� aft ? ..:..�, :.. -'w,�°J�ar Ya'�� �s'• ``' !5,. 'r.''i.r:.1 w+ry' ..W 1.t+, 11s°q�F Fat'^°y �:`ti;^',G�l'x i'fw�: :. , .r ;^' ,S'. ,� N!:,� ry .v,.,?'f,✓v, ,if v?a.., 7'•,,r.,�';,•.rf'. .r7±tr;,c. J J.;� <'•."$ +`k"%t @„n'�,'., ,f ,n�u +?.,�:. ^n t�'. .�^v�-.e�..=: k"� 3 I ., ,�, . ....,,,. .r,;� .- ,,, ?-•,; Y. .r: r ,,c:w ,,r,t. .,,a C.d.,�,., ..� 7?....i :...,,,, ,. , ':.:,'; :.: ,:.:. W.:�i.,, ',.. ,.,..: .✓t,..... .. 'pr:aS ��3:;H L ri" "az4"s i...,j:: 4a, r.,:a :W''+ ✓ �� 'i"" '' ..ne.:;. :.:';+r a.:, � � .'.,w7•,mmx -:..��� rl .v., rid+'+q,. r +, ,i. .:(::� ,.«;.p.,. 'i}•'.,.F°"�`�a r� ,.,J. � ?a r► .,r�' -`+ r't,✓;^ `4 +a'k`i '•`� � ,�M1�'. Y. .......:,,, .., y..p. .yv c ::Y,,r, >'�• .:L 1, a IS ,,�... .. .. "'',a^5s».,.., a,k,f.r w i <. m o ,. r ..;v.,.,.,.j, - ,:- ..... :-,d.-..., ., �1� e;W ..wr•S.M' °4s `:ago- ,:,,... ��. P� Y. �'F�<.•} ,�'e .,�rx. `�..�°. a. ,w+, n : .. �'•":-,..+,.a' ^.,': ,,.sam .. ,ur r! e._ 7 ,;.. s -..,.: ,5 :: ,..,, .?,•,; a ',°4"': :.Qil.,"', ;, 'fir e�. ::w ,fib•. d4.- ,3+, :,.'s, ..�` ,�. 'P{Pt, "'�"'`"�s ,a..;- ,� ,...-,�,.,,.m k,�.,.k;.. A.',?r!. .,r e;... "' 'x f � -:,. -+ ow ..- ":'P:'" 3^'.+,.. w,:,,'e';y'•' 'i.'�'k.. � ��-9f :,:�" k„{,"t�+: ,,L,.:3,. .. „�?f' ., m•.wt,w.. .,.,. ... .:. ,.;. ,,. «„,r:^.... „:; 'w` ..p;mk. t: ;y,, Y.f � } a.a::�` .ew +M w�`"F. .9nA: o.. .rL..,.b-.r( ..f '"' r,+L,,.,. ::xo. :r ,.....,ro.4 ,r,,.' Y- s.'� h. 't 4:a .i. .+?t•'�"..,�J•1., C, xa 11 7m ^t� ,fi, sw^ 4>.,.. "'-�!!y�'> r..,t„>•e.,rh..*r,s,d�°" .. :,�:<..; .;..:'. :J ......_ ». :�•.. r��'.. ,,,st , .,..,....,.fra - k �'"�,!I y�;f�.. 7' .:.1�r a,:.b r� :.,; R ... .r., �«m. .. .,+', t,.•n ,._.., .,.,,.. .r: .. '-w .:.,,. _ -.,. a.,,.,.,, .:.�. ,, ,� u.�2,g '•K,� ,.''w^1; o "`y�.' ,:.. ��.!¢,� ,,., +!:' .. �.v.,..,. fv �.:.T. :,u, .,, .,. ^ ,;..... . ..,. .-,,.'..� �. ., ,�.. .,. v _,. '.as.;�; ...•f. °~"• '^ a �k,. li!,',, P41w?+::yc,. 4,.r�W, ..W , ':,!'e;�i''o-^'l,.� .: ia.N ..v..,l�u'a#T:„+ .,. .. :, ::.!,.., ... ,.�; _M:,.v..a,.. y.f, t '. a .,. ,., .,. � r', .y,.> d ::`iI!,,�• �.n. rM1rr. ,N .S3' :,+'E�'.. .''r_.Ja i Y':Y,s . 1 ,? .'::6J Me...x :,. ,.., q. .. �..:hJ,4§w:•' n.. ...y.:, ::....:,•\t: h,.�^MC:/.. r,i: ''Ly C'� r +2� r ,. a „,,,, .::,,,,.r~. ;:.. „y»,h•,,. ✓^`., ',. a..,.,. ,� ° .,.. i., .z... ,yrS.w .... "5r S '�' :Y ..;p' ..✓,fir« ^.�,.'."., nd._. a, r+�`• a•. ;y,.x -,,y "/ r ,,fi r°"^r':�,,r':9�, �,:� ,.,y...; :+ht' .p!:,, '.�. .: .v N �,w.•i. wk,,.. e u -.c 'i,nH«, ;r'•' ':.;,,:..re•-.;yl.y., ,wtr a, .k• l ,w ':;y ^. �y'�!. °Aa, ;.x:,,'.. '7,.a.. .. .v _::,,. V, f.t:. ;,+. ,.w"w,a, 1 ::'.' „. '� ,S fM.,;' q'r''. .d;< '�.• .+n ,C:.. :W t,.. ,.i, :., .. 1,4':i.•,.:.P^'„e.a:"1+ft' ,,....h; ,.. n. ,:' L`bs. .yam. .,r. .-..... �, l.',. r.t:. Y 'r'a�f �rl, '^i: ,.f. _.,➢''* �+�eu ,A;;. ..,.,w .,r,.-+.r ;,, °I,. ,.., .r r.., ,'.,.v..r,,,arr ,".sr ,.,...r , ,,.. d.„vr .+' :,..,. '.,uv +,..,,, p :`t✓': ,,.. .,.. ,,. .b. bac� ,. ,., ,. ,rd...,, .,.. q.:; �� ,.., ,-. ,,,,..vF..Aa.^«e:,: •-� �,. � - iA; j.:. ti i e ,,,.•.,1. '.r ..:, v: ,.,,a ,. ,,,w:u-:... ,'•, x. .,,.. S., ..k.,a ..,. ;�'.e„',,��`` :r,. ::' ,:.� .,� r, ,t ".t. t L d. ,�pi'..N. L4°, S°,'✓w<Y:�' ..Af.. ,a .,hi :: -,-- ',..,...T'..P.:.y .r ... :w..,, ,.W.A 11 _ :n�f'4 , r4.,-, Ns. °ik. ,':U'Y,,;W^f, b, •'. ,,1:'y,. "'Z!; Ip"r i< .:. w,, ,,a.,w',, c:�r.,..-v..+ `Y'...,•k �`aayvr. f _r '.A;.,5 i:',.�1,.:'�v�mi'.�.,'w.�»,w, "d,r l e ,S€P-2t-2005 09:27 FROM-Metro Realty +8606776919 T-657 P.002/004 F-263 BERItYPATCHHASSOCLjTESLIMITED PARTNEIt,SHIP Via Certified Mail Septernber 26,2005 -'" Pauline Johnson Donald Chapman P 195 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms. Johnso:a and Mr. Chapman: The undersigned hereby respectfully requests a sight line easement in accordance with our conversations with you_ In consideration of the granting of this easement, vve offer to pay you $10,000. In addition,we will finish the construction of the p'VC�ieket fence on your property and remove snow and ice on a timely basis from all paved surfaces in your yard for so long as 'You reside there. In the event that you have changed your mind and are in agreement with our proposal,kindly so indicate by siguin.g the enclosed easement. I will hand deliver a certifled check in the amount of S10,000 to your home in exchange for delivexy of the easement. Thank you for Your consideration of this request. Very Truly Yours, BERRY PATCH 11 ASSOCIATES LBETED PARTNERSHIP By: Berry Patch Il Gp, LLC Geoffrey ager,lV,(e er 6 Executive brivo,Suite no • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-69191ax F:1Apermttn1 Dcvclapme—Wftr Pasch 1"dYiinc John=Enacmem P gLmxt 0.2&05." SEP-2f-2005 09:27 FROM—Metro Realty +8606778919 T-657 P-003/004 F-263 SZGHTLINE EASEMENT TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING. KNOW YE, THAT I, Pauline G.Johnson, of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, for the consideration of One Dollar and other valuable considerations,received to our full satisfaction of the State of Connecticut, do hereby grant unto the said State of'Connecticut, its successors and assigns forever,that certain full and perpetual easement for sightline,under, over and across portions of land of the Grantors herein., situated in The Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, on the southwesterly side of Oakland Road, and shown as "Site Line easement Area"on a map to be filed in the South Windsor Town Clerk's Office, entitled. "General Location Prepared for Berry Patch.pelt Rd. & Oakland Rd. (Kr. 30) South Windsor Connecticut Widening Plan Oakland Road(RT. 30) Sheet 1 of 1 Date: June:23,2004,Revised to 6/23/04 scale 1 inch:=30 ft.,prepared by Design Professionals, Inc." TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises for the purpose aforesaid unto the State of Connecticut, its:;uccessors and assigns forever. It WIT NrESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hands and seals this_day of September, 2005, Signe,cL Sealed acid Delivered in the presence of ' Witness Pauline G. Johnson Witness STATE OF CON.N,ECTICUT) ) ss: COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of , 2005,by Pauline cs. Johnson. Notary Public My Commission Expires C;1Aoummts add SUW0F%WendyP%=W%&IIn2gTanpm-my Snt nzt FiIcs0L C3GVoMmn Sip.%inc Fmcm=Ldx m m \\` • N -4 pp N Cr� '1y o_ �0�p� o, p1 sa.TZ• -., O A 11` A N 0 r i 0 A D o m I! Yf ICI �� l�l LQ L1fFtlE fASEYfNl L1YE ' � t� � �� 9+ f i PAVUNE 0. JOHNSON ,� If+ '+t cn m m EQs-erW For SlyU Um Arad. ,f t Easern,-„P Areas = 1103�gf1. �i \ 'f (• t - 't t �� i Ott +tcn t CYR ti 1 } ' Fes_ a an +c e� / i •. til o sraEo r=za• 0 T TOWN OF SOUTH WNDSOR 4� MAP SHD'AIAG CASEMENT GRANTED TQ YA°i4�EB1EfCEfS! �+ BERRY PATCH LLC.Wom 1 N Q] �PA�°EfIIY.AtWf7/1�49FCi'P1LrPA°EO!��A'I�i1'P�lGX lCl7 Pa A 4{�LASl7 10 MY IS6'OW�FM^L rND FFl� TF75 WPP i5 BY � Ul:rK°7 etN C15 SEiBSFAMTIALLY COBFLCT AS LORD HERECN _ ��'%��++K�►�M+�r�,l,raA�,��,,,��r,,,,�R,�, entt � xE'.TsiLri Lo.9r PAULINE G. JOHNSON -Pop. per xc oarc 44fia ;4 hl7,35Y,ET!WILL•PWA rU B6' rage or c•rc OStAY PliO £1GYAS NC. i3W-r um m's'. SCALE I'=20' DATE �bll N1THW1 SIGpAIURE AND CHEK16`SED SF1.E 5-iEE1 J Or—L— 51-26 52-2 51'-12 � 51-10 52-122 51-11 { ` 52-95 ----� I 1 52-123 ; I 51-32 \ I 52-124 i 51-39 1 52-125 1 I 52-94 , oif, 52-126 52-127 52-128 51-33 52-93 rP 52-4 ub Y 52-91 y 51-34 Milli 52-90 c 52-89 z ' 38-1 0 � � -`'�_ D\ ` o� 52-9E eM/NG 38-2 / 39-51 39-53 39-54 39-64 4v' RC 39-6 39-55 27-15 39-50 / D VIEW'ERR q 9\ GRAN 30 39-58 39-56 39-63 39-5 39-52 � 0 38-5 - 39-57 ``-� y 39-65 '� 39-46 39-62 ZA 5 "` "' JG- 51-9 1-13 '` • 51-26 O - O � 52-2 ti 51-12 51-1 Q 52-122 51-11 52-95 j i 1 52-123 51--32 52-124 1 , 51-39 1 52-125 1 1 52-94 � 11 aye 52-126 52-127 � i - - - - - --- - -52--93-- - 9� - -52-4- --- - -- - -52=-l28 f i i 51-33 i � (��. \ 1 ' - - - ��G 51-35 52-92 52-91 1 6 51-34 1 ; 1 0 e 52-90 - y --- - 9= 52-89 38-1 v - . ` fl 52-96 - Zzil � 38-2 J 39-51 39-6 G� G �., 39-53 39-54 39-64 RC` � 39-55 27--15 39-50 38-3 39-56 39-52 39-63 Al 39-5 39-58 a� 38-5 39-57 39-46 39-62 2A s' International Department peoples bank People's Bank Bridgeport Center, 850 Main Street Bridgeport. Connecticut 06604-4913 203-338.4155 or 203.338.4157 August 5, 2003 Fax:203-338.4608 Telex:6813363 Town of South Windsor - 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Attn: Planning & Zoning Commission Gentlemen, All On the instructions and for account of Dunn Sager Interests O'Meara Farm LLC and Berry Patch Associates LP, 6 Executive Drive, Farmington CT .06032, we hereby ' establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. SB-1293 in your favor, available by your draft(s) drawn on us at sighti for any sum or sums not exceeding the 5.,ay0. total amount U.S. Dollars Twenty Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars (US$25,000.00) - `w+tiM Drafts drawn under this credit must be accompanied by this original Letter of Credit, and: 0 1. A statement purportedly signed by an authorized official of the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut stating that the erosion and sediment control conditions set forth in the July 30, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission approval and in a letter dated August 5, 2002 from the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut addressed to Mr. Geoffrey Sager, The Metro Realty Group Ltd. , in connection with the Berry Patch Affordable Senior Housing Development, Oakland 4"bK Road, South Windsor, CT Site Plan 02-22P have not been fulfilled. -4Z c In respect to the written statement above, People's Bank is authorized to accept " it as binding and correct without investigation or responsibility for the accuracy, veracity, correctness or validity of the same or any part thereof. Partial drawings are permitted. Draft(s) drawn under this Letter of Credit must bear on their face the clause "Drawn under People's Bank Letter of Credit No. SB-1293 dated August 5, 2003". We engage with you that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms and conditions of this credit will be duly honored upon presentation and delivery of documents, as specified, to the above address, ATTN: InternatA"onal Department, on or before August 5, 2004, subject to the conditions in the next paragraph. ontinu€d�on-Page—Two. . . - - - -