HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-12P Spec Ex/Site Plan of Dev _ �vwr yr avvia wurLavrc _ _
!'j."J lfft as Z0fJJBG CUFATAISSION /o''t" 5e��
APPLICATION FORM
Application No:
Official Receipt Date:
RECEIVED � �z
� c
Receipt No: .1
FEB 2 4 2003 _oR.C�.
APPLICANT: Shady Brook AsSociates, LLC c/o Brian E ward
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT.
ADDRESS: 475 Talcottville Road, Vernon, CT 06066
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: cama
ADDRESS: mama
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: north side of Strong Road, west of Route 5
ASSESSOR'S MAP # 96 PARCEL# 11 ZONE A-40
NAME, ADDRESS, TEL& FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED:
Peter R. DeMa11iP principal , professionals, Inc. 165 ou h SatP11i+P Rnar7, o� h
Windsor CT 06Q74 TP1 • 291-8255Fax: 29 8757 ,
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply):
❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required)
❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision Q Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required)
❑ Subdivision Q Minor Q Major
Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major
❑ Conditional Approval
® Special Exception to Article "4. 1 . 12 (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required)
❑ Site Plan of m Develo e�nf
P
❑ General Plan of Development
❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec_ 14 - Public Hearing required)
❑ Regulation Amendment: Q Zoning Q Subdivision (Attach propoged amendment)
Temporary and Conditional Permit for
❑ Major Home Occupation for
❑ Other(explain in detail)
An Application Pending sign Is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days
prior to being heard by the Commission.
x� rep,
Signature of A plicant ignature of Prdperty Owner
(See reverse side for additional information)
u,
Shady Brook Associates, LLC RECEIVED
Shady Brook Village SRD
Strong Road F E B 2 4 2003
South Windsor, Connecticut
DPI Project No. 98-1123 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT.
Beginning at a point in the southeast corner of the property herein described, said point
being on the north side of Strong Road and further described as being a monument to be
set; thence, N23°-43'-07"E along property now or formerly of Florence Winton, a
distance of 200.00 feet to an iron pipe; thence,N66°-20'-47"W along property now or
formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., for a distance of 1.78 feet to a
point; thence,N23°-18'-06"E along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 24.63 feet to a point;thence along a curve to the
left having a central angle of 24°-42'-47" and a radius of 85.00 feet along property now
or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 36.66 feet to a
point, said curve being subtended by a line of bearing 10°-56'-43" and distance of 36.38
feet;thence, N23°43' 07"E along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 496.74 feet to a point;thence,N67° 00'03"W
along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a
distance of 280.02 feet to a point;thence,N23°-43'-07"E along property now or formerly
of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 80.01 feet to a point;
thence, N67°-00'-03"W, along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 208.30 feet to a point;thence, S23°-03'-09"W
along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a
distance of 95.00 feet to a point;thence, N67°-00'-03"W along property now or formerly
of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 406.66 feet to a point;
thence, S5°-00'-45"E along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 228.78 feet to a point;thence, S23°-05'-29"W
along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a
j distance of 104.58 feet to a point; thence,N65°-28'-30"W along property now or
formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 158.56 feet to a
point;thence, S24°-31'-30"W along property now or formerly of Edward T. Sunderland,
III, a distance of 405.55 feet to a point;thence, S630-1 P-07"E along the north side of
Strong Road, a distance of 199.08 feet to a point; thence, N23°-05'-29"E along property
now or formerly of Robert G. & Chamberlain Hunt, and property now or formerly of
South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., partly by each, in all a distance of 315.03
feet to a point;thence, S630-11'-07"E along property now or formerly of South Windsor
Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 315.03 feet to a point; thence, S230-05'-
29"W along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a
distance of 149.06 feet to a point;thence, S66°-52'-47"E along land now or formerly of
South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 393.90 feet to a point;
thence, S23°-18'-06"W along land now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation
Trust, Inc., for a distance of 15.00 feet to a point;thence,N66°-41'-54"W along property
now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 0.77 feet
to a point; thence, S230-07'-14"W along property now or formerly of Kevin J. &Laurie
A. Charette, a distance of 150.00 feet to a point; thence, S66°-52'-46"E along the north
side of Strong Road, a distance of 50.61 feet to a point, said point being the point and
place of beginning.
Feb 24 03 10: 52a Galen Semprebon 860-291 -8757 p. 2
Shady Brook Associates,LLC RECEIVED
Shady Brook Village SRD FEB 2 4 �003
DPI Project No. 98-1123
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING nG10T
Direct Abutter List
Map/Lot No. REWIrty Owner Address
96/15 Florence Winton P.O. Box 92
East Windsor, CT 06088
96/16 1 Kevin J. & Laurie A. Charette 90 Strong Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
96/19 Robert G. &Chamberlain Hunt 42 Strong Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
96/35 Edward T. Sunderland, YII 1464 Main Street
South Windsor, CT 06074
* South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc. c/o Charles B. Shepard
P.O. Box 415
East Windsor HiII CT 06028
I Marcia'B-' Crashes on Strong
From: Sgt. Tom Field
To: Jeff Doolittle; Marcia Banach; Michele Lipe
Date: 1/17/03 11:26AM
Subject: Crashes on Strong Rd.
Bruce Hilton called requesting crash information on Strong Road from Route 5 to Main Street.
gave him the following info:
2000-9 crashes; 1 with injuries, 3 deer, 1 evading
2001 -8 craches; 1 with injuries
2002-6 crashes; 2 deer
Of the 23 crashes, 15 were near or on Route 5, 5 others were west of Ident Road.
Tom
In-House Development Review Meeting 2-25-03
Present: Banach,Drabek,Folger,Doolittle, Gantick, Stead, Shaw,Field,Reichle
Podunk Ridge SRD
Shady Brook SRD
Lynnwood Subdivision(2 new lots)
Tomek Interior Lot
1. Podunk Ridge SRD
• Concern re highly erodible slopes&future slope failure.
• Backs of houses right on top of"rain garden"depressions: if these areas are mowed areas,may
get filled in over time by residents as they are right on the residents' rear doorsteps. If they are
planted as rain gardens,there is no back yard.
• Existing flooding onto Ellington Road is a concern.
• Pumping of sewage: emergency generator needed, &more detailed pump station information
with indication of financial responsibility.
• Most units have no back yard.
• Input from Stead and Field regarding fiscal impacts of SRD's; for example,yearly reimbursement
by Town to SRD of snow removal,lighting costs,&possible increased number of emergency
medical calls.
• Identify street hardware(signs,poles, etc)that may be sight line issues.
• Use yield sign instead of stop sign internally.
• Will need operation&maintenance plan for stormwater& sanitary sewers.
• Debris and junk on site needs to be cleaned up.
2. Shady Brook SRD
• Is drainage easement from South Windsor Land Conservation Trust in place?
• How do you get around the detention basins to maintain?
• Will be recommending to PZC sidewalks on both sides of street.
3. Lynnwood Subdivision
• Existing drainage runs off the slope into Barber Hill Rd
• Need to show 90 x 90 square& 10,000 sq ft buildable area outside 15% slopes
4. Tomek Interior Lot
• Reset iron pins at front corners
• WPCA approval required
Shady Brook SRD 03-12P
Planning Comments—3/11/03
1. Section 4.1.12g allows the increase in setback(when frontage is less than 200 feet).
Please illustrate on the plan how this requirement is being met?
2. All front, side and rear yards must be shown on the plans.
3 Proposed tree line along the perimeter of the project as shown on the topography plan
does not reflect the clearing shown on the landscape plan. This should be corrected to
reflect the actual clearing that will take place to accommodate units on the
building/buffer line.
4: Is the buffer line shown on the easterly side of the property following any property
line/zone line? If it is a buffer, no unit driveways can be within the buffer(driveway
for lot one appears to be in the buffer)
5, A buffer cross sections, illustrating the buffer at 5-years and again at maturity must be
provided(Sec. 10.4.a.1 and 2). Also, a cross section, illustrating the buffer adjacent
to the industrial zone, should be shown.
6. Is there any signage proposed? If so,please provide a diagram with dimensions. Ajot
7. Lighting plan must be submitted in accordance with Section 17.20.
General Comments
1. Is drainage easement from South Windsor Land Conservation Trust in place?
2. How do you get around the detention basins to maintain?
3. Staff will be recommending to PZC sidewalks on both sides of street.
4(4.% The landscape plan is very difficult to read(looks like too many layers are on and
It lettering is on top of other lettering). A legible plan should be submitted.
5. Drainage calculations have not been received toctate.
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM APR 2 204„
To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNIIw
From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer
Date: 4/2/03
RE: App 03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD
have reviewed the above application for the Shady Brook SRD and have the following
comments:
1. Show the water main in Strong Road and where the line for this development will tap into the
main. Label the size and pipe material of the water line for this development
2. Label the Sanitary M.H. on Gorski Drive at Strong Road as existing.
3. Add spot grades at the western edge of the limits of clearing behind units 9-12 and by the
northwest detention basin.
4. Include leaders from the labels for the "Prop. Endwall" to the actual endwall outlet from both
detention basins.
5. The detention basin outlet pipes should be at least 12 inch diameter to prevent clogging and
for ease of maintenance. Also the slopes of these pipes need to be lowered or Class V RCP
is to be used for pipes with slopes greater than 10%.
6. There needs to be a stone overflow spillway outlet from each detention basin.
7. Label the rip rap channel downstream of the outlet from the northeast detention basin.
8. Confirm that the outlet velocities from both detention basins are very low (1-2 ft/sec) for all
storm events so there is minimal erosion downstream of the outlets. Corrugated pipe could
be used on the outlets to help reduce the velocity.
9. The"Toe Drain"detail should be changed to 6"perforated pipe.
10. Increase the size of the overflow pipe from the depressed area west of units 9-12 to at least
10 inches for ease of maintenance. Include a grate or screen on the inlet to this pipe to
exclude debris(and critters)that may cause clogging.
11. Explain why the Typical Roadway Section shows the road cross slope superelevated
(sloped to one side) rather than the Town Standard crowned road cross section.
Superelevation is not normally used in a residential road because it causes problems with
surface water crossing the road and icing in winter. What criteria was used to determine the
superelevation slope (3.1%)? This is not adjusted to match the curve direction and radius.
Several of the curves in Bailey Circle (especially the loop at the end of this road) are
superelevated against the direction of curvature which could cause safety concerns. If
superelevation is to be proposed the slope should be set according to the design speed and
radius of curves and the direction of superelevation should match the direction of curvature of
the road.
12. Remove the sedimentation structures and include a 4 foot deep sump on the last catch basin
in the road before the pipe run to the detention basin.
13. WPCA review and approval of this plan is required.
Please call me if you have any questions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM
TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw,Michael Gantick, Thomas Field,Bill Lanning,Kris Lindstrom,
Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mel Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula, Jeff Doolittle
FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP,Director of Planning
The Planning&Engineering Departments have received.plans for the following project:
Location: a2
1%-Site Plan O Subdivision No. Acres Zone
O Industrial O Commercial Residential No. Lots/Units
Water: Q Public O Private Well Sewerage: ® Public O Septic system(s)
Project Description:
Future Town-owned property involved? O Yes p No
O new street(s) O new detention area
O new open space/recreation area O active O passive
Planning Department notes:
Please comment by 3 f Iu f a ?, and return to the Planning Department.
Shady Brook Senior Residence Development
PH 4-8-03
1) Request for a Special Exception and site plan approval to construct a 20-unit
Senior Residence Development on the northerly side of Strong Road, easterly
of Main Street. The subject site property is 11.85 acres, A-40 zone.
2) There are existing single family residences to the south and west of the
proposed Shady Brook Senior Residence development. To the east is
industrially-zoned land and uses. There is an existing 50-foot right-of-way
along the new driveway to the industrially-zoned rear property currently owned
by Glen Knafel. To the northeast is property of the South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust. We would also note the presence of a fifteen-foot strip of
land belonging to the Land Trust surrounding most of the property. Town staff
have some concern about this fifteen-foot strip of land, as it will be
exceptionally difficult for residents and neighbors to differentiate where Shady
Brook land ends and the fifteen-foot strip of Land Trust property begins.
3) The proposed density is 2.3 units per net buildable acre; maximum 4 units per
net buildable acre are allowed. Proposed impervious coverage is 19.8%; 60%
allowed. Required parking is 1.5 spaces per unit, or 30 spaces; the applicant has
provided 82 spaces, or 4 spaces per unit. It appears that all other zoning
requirements are met.
4) There are regulated wetlands on this site. IWA/CC approved the application on
November 18, 1998 with a $10,000 bond and an approval condition requiring
the design engineer to oversee the installation of the detention basins. The
IWA/CC reviewed changes with this proposal and did not feel there was
substantial change requiring a new permit.
5) If this application is approved, the number of total SRD units approved will
remain at 179 (because there are already 20 units approved at this location). The
maximum number of units that the Commission may approve is currently
capped at 250.
6) Public water is available in Strong Road. Public sewer can be extended from
Gorski Drive. WPCA approval is required. If the development will have
curbside refuse collection and recycling, a hold harmless agreement and
permission to enter form will need to be provided to the Town to allow the
refuse & recycling vehicles to enter the site.
7) All proposed units are single-family units, with the exception of on e four-unit
building. The units would vary in size according to the new formula, with 6
units under 1400 sq ft, 6 units between 1800 and 2000 sq ft, and the remainder
of the units between 1400 -1800 sq ft.
8) The Special Exception criteria for review of a SRD include:
• traffic impacts will not be detrimental to the residential character of the
neighborhood;
• there will be minimal adverse effects on existing uses in the area;
• surrounding property values will be conserved and the character of the
neighborhood will not be unduly disrupted;
• impacts will not be detrimental to the capacity of the present and proposed
utilities, street, drainage system, sidewalks, and other elements of the
infrastructure;
• the land is physically suited to the proposed use and minimal adverse
environmental impacts are created;
• the SRD proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town
Plan of Development;
• the SRD proposal will help meet senior housing needs of South Windsor;
• the location of the SRD facility is within reasonable proximity to community
facilities or amenities which serve the needs of elderly residents, or is within
reasonable proximity to indoor/outdoor activity centers, or is within close
proximity to or contains permanent open space land;
• the SRD facility has been designed to meet the needs of handicapped
residents or visitors;
• the architectural design is aesthetically pleasing and low profile
9) There are no sidewalk shown on the northern side of the street. Staff would
recommend that a sidewalk be on both sides of the street throughout the project.
10) The site is a treed site, which is wooded with predominantly deciduous trees.
The applicant is showing a combined yard and buffer of 35 feet. The buffer
shows evergreen interplanting among and along the edge of existing deciduous
trees. The applicant has included cross-sections as required to demonstrate the
buffer. It should be noted that on the northerly and westerly sides of the site the
detention area is within the buffer area.
11) The applicant submitted a traffic study which indicates that there will be
little impact to the existing roadway network. Sight line issues have been
identified, and trimming will be implemented.
12) The Architecture and Design Review Board reviewed the plans on March
20 and April 3. The proposal was well-received by ADRC. The Committee
forwarded the following recommendations:
• All of the units should have some sort of brick masonry;
• The unit should be placed so that no two identical units will be placed
next to each other;
• The landscape architect should oversee the planting plan
13) If this application is approved, the Planning Dept. requests that plan
revisions to address any concerns raised tonight and to address engineering
comments dated April 2 be submitted before this application is scheduled for a
work session.
c�� !y O
\ T —
66.0 /, 6'�9 0 INS-6D ANSLAT L = 3
FFeR � 67.0 S X 9.25 t
?\\ PROP_ C-C6#3
.S.M.H.4 T.F.=67:65
\ } T.F.=68.10 tp INV. =61.25
IN\5- �( ® N23'18'C
<66.7 \
AND
;T S66 20'47'
�\
1.78
- - -- , 5237806'w �� w
- _ 15.00'
' - - - - P.S.M.H.3 . J
T.F.=67-75 t p
INV.=54.50 0
S66 47154"E
0.77'
^//r- CHARET7F-
KENN J & 00 s PROP. C-C8#2
- - LAURIE A- , 1 p2 T.F.=67.0
h z to OO INV.=63.25
02 ` OO O
,
NOTE. STRONG ROAD, BET6YEEN �
.
' GORSKI DRIVE AND PROPOSED '
HALL BE S
BAILEY CIRCLE,TRUCTED ONCE UTILITIES
' RECONS ' N
ARE INSTALLED. i
t 0' to
G.iiwe7�L
;R y� PROP 1 .. /FT
\ PROP. /
\ STOP SIGN C-CE 1 � �Ax,, �Y
\\ � =25 PROP. # '�j \
\ , R0� T.F 68 40/
\\ TREET SIGPI�
\\ �s X69.1 R- \
69 25
STREETLINE NOT ESTABLISHED-
SIREETLINE, AS DEPICTED A TAKEN \\�/
FROM MAP REFERENCE,J` \
ASSUMED. \� \
TF
T.F.= 2
\\ \
692
INV.=53.80
D y °b
o•.
11/�. NTf3A�vG LAN,c;)r�A�E�E N .Vo. oy
APR 2 1 2001
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEFT
0 / r = 11
66.0 0 INV=6 7ANSLAT - L = J
PROP. C-C8#3
.S.M.H-4 o T.F.=67.65
\ + T.F.=68.10 co INV. =61.25
/N\5.0 Co 0
z N2246'C
- - `?So00.
S Aj� 66.7
AND
;T, ING r S66 ZO'47'
1
1.78'
- - -- , 523'18'06'"W
-� - - � - - - 15.00'
P.S. 67
T.F=67 75 JV �p]-Y0Z-,^ISTR4/P
� � A
/NV.=54.50 A 0 91509 17A-
s6s
0.77' - ' �� IIA7 y33/TY=
N/r CNA y'� S 7-
KENN "C , pp s PROP. C-C8#2
- - LAURIE A_ i �. b2 T F_=67.0
INV_=63.25
r
r NOTE: BETWEEN
GORSKI DRIVE AND PROPOSED STRONG ROAD. BE7
r r
r BAILEY CIRCLE, SHALL BE r 0 i ry
r RECONSTRUCTED ONCE UTILITIES
N
ARE INSTALLED. i ,' iNNT�►, FLORDVCE
r �!o
aR y PROP
4O
�
\ \' TOP SIGN =25 PROP. C-CB#1
\\ r R0� ( T 6.40/
\\ . TREET SIGN>
\\ 00 X69•1 R=
FIB\ 69 P5
s
� -
_
STREETLINE NOT ESTABLISHED.
STREETLINE. AS DEPICTED. AS TAKEN
FROM MAP REFERENCE/
ASSUMED. \ \
P.S.M_H.2
T.F.=6 D - - -
INV.=5j.3.BO. 5g4
4 0.M N "4
-0-ultn 0-Ye Sotd-A
� .
s
C, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
0R.00 TELEPHONE (860) 644-2RECE1 M ED
May 12,2003 MAY 13 2003
Design Professionals,Inc. SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT,
165 South Satellite Road
South Windsor,CT 06074
Attn: Karen Isherwood
RE: Shady Brook Associates
Strong Road
South Windsor, CT
Dear Ms.Isherwood:
The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its regular meeting of May 6,2003,gave
approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a senior residential development on Strong
Road, as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Topographic Map"prepared by Design Professionals,
Inc.,Project No.98-1123,Drawing No. 6 dated 2-21-03,revised 3-14-03 and 4-04-03,and subject to the
following conditions:
1. Must conform to Town and State regulations regarding the Small Systems Act
2. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department.
3. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once
The sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written
Verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial
conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority, and meeting all Town
regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction.
This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans.
Very truly yours,
r
Jos6ph J. Carino,Chairman
Water Pollution Control Authority
Cc: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager
Michael J. Gantick,Director of Public Works
Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer
Marcia Banach,Director of Planning
John Collins,Chief Building Inspector
Shady Brook Associates,LLC
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors
gis♦ gps ♦ landscape architects
May 28, 2003 RECEI EL)
Marcia Banach,Planning Director Mqy 2 9 2003
Town of South Windsor SOUTH WINOWR PL WNG DEpT.
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: Shady Brook SRD DPI Project No. 98-1123
Strong Road
South Windsor, Connecticut
On behalf of our client, Shady Brook Associates, LLC, I hereby request a 90-day extension from
the original filing date for recording the mylar in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank you.
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC.
By: J4� �AmAvh
are M. she d,P.E.
cc: Brian Edwards
165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor,Connecticut 06074
Tel:(860)291-8755•Fax:(860)291-8757
Email:dpicivilkaol.com
S0yl N St4
y F 7own O-Psoa& ?di
o .
a . u
s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR•CON�fv AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 1, 2004
Mr. Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Re:Preconstruction Meeting—App103-12P, Shady Brook Village
Dear Mr. Edwards:
IN ATTENDANCE
Jeff Doolittle TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue (860) 644-2511 x245
Chris Chiulli Double C Const. PO 785, Rocky Hill (860) 721-1503
Val Hodder CT Water Co. East Windsor (860) 623-3355 x 3352
Bruce Edwards Shady Brook LLC 475 Talcottville Road,Vernon (860) 870-9100
Cathy Hoggatt SBC 40 Brainard Road,Hartford (860) 725-4433
Bernie Drabek TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue (860) 644-2511 x241
Jeff Flogei OSW �5 0 uSu nivan-Avenue A-&60)-644--2SH x22fi
Mel Stead,Jr. TOSW 157 Burgess Road (860)648-6366
Michele Lipe TOSW 1540 Sullivan Avenue (860) 644-2511 252
The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting:
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
1. All•erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in
each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands
Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or
r. if any problems/concerns arise during construction.
2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal).
.3.1 During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained
to minimize tracking of diiVgravel on to Strong Road. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust
control as required.
Public Works
1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction.
They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved
plans are to be used on the job site.
2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major
construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist (requested, required) for the
following:
a. After site is staked out
b. All drainage work
c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist
d. Preparation of subbase, six(6) inch lifts
e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2)inch layers maximum
3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved
testing company.
4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures,pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town
Engineer prior to installation.
5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for
inspection and correction measures(if necessary)of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement.
6. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation.
7. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to paving and after
subgrade formation.
8. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and
sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist.
9. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts
with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or
structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling.
10. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project,will.be-directed to Chris:Chiulli at
250-2517 or Bruce Edwards at 883-5498 in the field.
11. All filling to be done in accordance with-Department of Transportation-specifications:. To be.compacted- .
in maximum lifts and tested as necessary.
12. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town.
13. Forty-eight-(48)hours notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection.
14. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to
implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing.: Tqwri will-attempt
to turn around within 24 hours.
15. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m., no work on Sunday.
16. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works.
17. A street cut permit is required for the road cut and work in Strong Road.
18. A drain layer permit is required for the main sewer line and separate drain layers permits are required for
each building lateral.
19. Catch basins shall have galvanized frames and grates.
20. Testing of sub-base,base, and pavement is required for work in Strong Road and Bailey Circle.
21. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These
spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore, the town stafFinspectors will be
requesting additional compaction tests in these areas.
22. Inspection of gravel access roads required prior to placement of topsoil.
23. For concrete sidewalks, 8"depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk
is constructed before lot development, the locations must be indicated on the as-built plans. If a
proposed driveway location is moved,the sidewalk must be removed to the nearest expansion joint and
rebuilt to the proper depth with reinforcement.
24. If a concrete monument is located within a driveway, a cast iron frame and cover must be provided for
town public improvement specifications.
25. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals,the contractor shall prepare an as-built
sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the
design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department
suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form.
26. During construction drainage must be addressed with drainage swales as necessary. For lawn
establishment, town staff will be requiring erosion control measures to be installed prior to the issue of
the certificate of occupancy to ensure soil stabilization. A detailed erosion control plan must be
implemented and depicted on the plot plan for review prior to the issuance of the building permit_most
particularly on lots with extensive grading.
Planning Department
1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes
required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not
preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan.
2. Trees to be cleared must be tagged and reviewed by Town staff prior to clearing.
3. The Architectural Design and Review comments are incorporated: All of the units should have some
brick masonry; the unit should be placed so that no two identical units (in color) will be placed next to
each other.
4. Site line clearing must be completed at the intersection of the new drive(Bailey Circle) and Strong Road
in accordance with the recommendations of the traffic engineer.
5. Buffer along drive should be constructed with a fence 6 feet high, 200 feet in length.
6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the street up to unit 20.
SNET/NU
1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection.
Fire Marshal
1. Blasting(if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal.
Police Services
1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a
company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency
numbers must be provided to Police Services.
2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the
street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802.
Barns garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same remises as a numbered structure are
� g g � g , p
excluded.
3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project.
4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services.
Building Department
1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit.
Coordinate with Chief Building Official.
Sincerely,
Michele R. Lipe, ICP
Assistant Director of Planning
MRL/kak
cc: Jeffrey Doolittle,Town Engineer
Karl Reichle, Public Works
Mel Stead,Public Works
Christopher Dougan, Chief Building Official
Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control
CL&P
SNET
MEMORANDUM
To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer
Date: 4/13/04
RE: App 03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Bond
We have received a request to establish the bond amount for the infrastructure improvements for
the Shady Brook SRD on Strong Road. I recommend the bond for this project be established at
$470,970 based on our review of the bond estimate provided. Please let me know if you have
any questions.
t D.NN Sf5
� x U �� �S-0� ?d
O
fi �
:. wG 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
f�OSOR-CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
April 20, 2004
Mr. Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
0-
Re: Appl 03,;2'1'P, Shady Brook Village SRD
Dear Mr. Edwards:
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on April 13, 2004, to set
the site bond on the above reference application at$470,970.00.
A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the issuance of building permits.
Sincerely,
14
Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman
Planning&Zoning Commission
THW/kak
Enclosure
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
r
10VIN SF4
C�
T-Own O-P s-otdA W&Idgot
y C 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR•cO AREA CODE 860/644-251 1
April 25, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0 510 0001 2 314 4116
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
c/o Brian Edwards
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Re: Appl 03-12P,'Shady Brook Village Senior Residence Development, request for special exception to
Section 4.1.12 and site plan for a 20 unit senior residence development located on property on the
northerly side of Strong Road, easterly of Main Street,A-40 zone
Dear Mr. Edwards:
We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on April 22, 2003, to approve with
modifications the above referenced application for a Special Exception to 4.1.12 and Site Plan of Development.
This approval is for the construction of a 20 unit Senior Residence Development to be known as "Shady Brook"
on property located on the northerly side of Strong Road, easterly of Main Street,A-40 zone as shown on plans
prepared by Design.Professional, Inc., Job No. 1123, dated April 4, 2003, as revised. This approval is subject to
the following modifications:
1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff.
2.. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office.
.3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation
Commission granted November 18, 1998 requiring a$10,000 bond and an approval condition requiring the
design engineer to oversee the installation of the detention basins.
4. An as--built plan is required prior to.issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning
Regulations.
5. A landscape bond in the amount of$10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars.
6. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of
South Windsor.
7. WPCA approval is required. A hold harmless agreement and permission to enter form will need to be
provided to the Town to allow the refuse&recycling vehicles to enter the site.
8. The street.number(s)must be included on the final plan.
9. Trees to be cleared must be tagged and reviewed by Town staff prior to clearing.
10. The Architectural Design and Review comments are incorporated: All of the units should have some sort of
brick masonry;the unit should be placed so that no two identical units (in color)will be placed next to each
other; the landscape architect should oversee the planting plan.
11. Engineering comments dated April 2, 2003, must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction.
12. Site line clearing must be completed at the intersection of the new drive(Bailey Circle) and Strong Road in
accordance with the recommendations of the traffic engineer.
13. Buffer along drive should be constructed with a fence 6 feet high, 200 feet in length.
14. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the street up to unit 20.
Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet 2 with the above modifications,together with three blueprint
copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed.
The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission
must be reproduced on the mylars.
After the mylars have been signed by the Commission,they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the
Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department.
Sincerely, ,]
Kevin McCann, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
KMcC/kah
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
Assessor
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Fire Marshal
I, Kevin McCann, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission, hereby certify that on April
22, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Shady Brook Associates, LLC, a Special Exception
to Article 4.1.12 of the Zoning Regulations to construct a 20 unit Senior Residences Development on property
located on the northerly side of Strong Road, easterly of Main Street,A-40 zone, as shown on plans prepared by
Design Professional, Inc., 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut.
Assessor's Map and Parcel Number:Map#96 Parcel#11
More particularly bounded and described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the southeast corner of the property herein described, said point being on the north side of Strong
Road and further described as being a monument to be set;thence,N231-43'-07"E along property now or formerly of
Florence Winton, a distance of 200.00 feet to an iron pipe;thence,N661-20'-47"W along property now or formerly of
South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc., for a distance of 1.78 feet to a point;thence,N23°-18'-06"E along property
now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 24.63 feet to a point; thence along a curve
to the left having a central angle of 24°-42'-47"and a radius of 85.00 feet along property now or formerly of South
Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 36.66 feet to a point,said curve being subtended by a line of bearing
10°-56'-43"and distance of 36.38 feet;thence,N23°43*07*E along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust,Inc., a distance of 496.74 feet to a point;thence,N67°00*03*W along property now or formerly of
South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 280.02 feet to a point;thence,N23°-43'-07"E along property
now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 80.01 feet to a point;thence,N67°-00'-
03"W,along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc., a distance of 208.30 feet to a
point;thence, S23°-03'-09"W along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance
of 95.00 feet to a point;thence,N67°-00'-03"W along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation
Trust,Inc., a distance of 406.66 feet to a point;thence, S5°-00'-45"E along property now or formerly of South Windsor
Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 228.78 feet to a point; thence, S23°-05'-29"W along property now or
formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc., a distance of 104.58 feet to a point;thence,N65°-28'-30"W
along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc., a distance of 158.56 feet to a point;
thence, S24°-3l'-30"W along property now or formerly of Edward T. Sunderland,III,a distance of 405.55 feet to a point;
thence, S63°-1 l'-07"E along the north side of Strong Road,a distance of 199.08 feet to a point;thence,N23°-05'-29"E
along property now or formerly of Robert G. &Chamberlain Hunt,and property now or formerly of South Windsor Land
Conservation Trust,Inc.,partly by each,in all a distance of 315.03 feet to a point;thence, S63°-11'-07E along property
now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc., a distance of 315.03 feet to a point;thence, S23°-05'-
29"W along property now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 149.06 feet to a
point;thence, S66°-52'-47"E along land now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of
393.90 feet to a point;thence, S231-18'-06"W along land now or formerly of South Windsor Land Conservation Trust,
Inc.,for a distance of 15.00 feet to a point;thence,N66°4l'-54"W along property now or formerly of South Windsor
Land Conservation Trust,Inc.,a distance of 0.77 feet to a point;thence, S23°-07'-14"W along property now or formerly
of Kevin J. &Laurie A. Charette,a distance of 150.00 feet to a point;thence, S66°-52'-46"E along the north side of
Strong Road,a distance of 50.61 feet to a point, said point being the point and place of beginning.
OWNER OF RECORD: Shady Brook Associates,LLC
Dated at South Windsor,Connecticut this
In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d
&-"Z,� Al �
Chairman
Planning&Zoning Commission
Received for record this day of , 19_,at
South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST:
a
emu`
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR V
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & 'SUBDIVISION
GENERAL
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON tirm Tq� rlrbjoa& Phone No.
Addres s f-t N S . (1'p'4 ��)7� !Q147 4 1tl Aa(R, rCr 61)4
�� � P&Z No.Site Name
Owner Phone No.
Contractor
Signature of Owner A Date:
A .
Signature of Design Engr Date
CHANGE: (Describe location an n ture change. Include :,
Four (4 ) copies of planlprofileof Change. )
-E-.-rs-1-r• Aut�'-d f i LT ivi io I 3t te rrh vv*.s----r,5---- tr,/
Reason for Change: (Why is 'change required) s
x
i
� t -
APPROVALS: (As Re uired)
iS Dir. Of Planning Date: bh
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public rks Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
k
White Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
l
; < . .a s �M
d
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Phone No.
Address S 4rl/;4-r !kS S' u n Ss. C T 0Gc�7_�
Site Name mil, gS•� �� vdl, 5 R P&Z No.
Owner 5 G y ...r Cr Esc<<< '� S 4 L . L. C . Phone No. $'7 u- �L
Contractor C c. Cot
Signature of Owner Date a
Signature of Design Engr. Date:
CHANGE: (Describe location and nature ot change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of 'plan/profile of Change. )
ev1.5 L ��vr6unn�vt � � �ci�t .7Y .►+� Gs• �.YS�.. ( t� .n,� «t ! Q..y
n�:J cc54 * .1 Y
��;��, yy'y 6,� u � rf S� � - L, 4s�►
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
- (� G tVira� rij �. etiGJ vyt41 h. WI C' r Pi �`�*yca +. Y c s r• •tw
c
,y r . e,� 4 k l w .-•s r . '�s.
APPROVALS: (As Required)
Dir. Of Planning / Date: j 'rJ'
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public W ks Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
White Town Engineer Yellow Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
y..
24'
BIT. CURB---\\
4' TOPSOIL L SEED
4"�TOPSOIL & SEED
GRASS STRIP RESERVED FOR
h HYDRANTS, POLES, ETC. FINIS
� TRAPROCK BASE T
' MT GRATM05.01- BIT. C1/2' BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CLASS 2
URFACE COURSE(COMPACTED) OVER%"TRRr 9&W_UN1/2' BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CLASS I TYPE
OVER tl96ii COWACTED) BINDER COURSE (COMPACTED)
ME ADATIDN OF M2.06 ■ IF PAVING IS DONE AFTER OCT.15.OR
BEFORE APRIL 15,2' OF BINDER COURSE NOTES-
SHALL BE PLACED.
1. TACK COAT TO BE APPLIED
PRIOR TO CURB PLACEME
REQUIRED BY TOWN.
COATING TO BE APPLIES
ALL MATERIALS ARE TO MEET CONN. D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS FORM 814A AS AMENDED M 04.0I.Id4. FORM 814 A
DESIGN TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER.
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION g11
(STA. 1+50 TO 12+67.4)
NOT TO SCALE NOT
4" TOPSOI
VADTH OF GRAVEL
AS SPECIFIED ON
GRAVEL DF
NOT TO
LAWN/ STREETS/ STREETS/
CROSS-COUNTRY PAVED AREAS PAVED AREAS
SEE PAVEMENT DETAIL SEE PAVEMENT DETAIL
4" M i .
1 O Approved granular non—organic bockfill
12" �' material placed and compacted in one
foot (max.) lifts.
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE `& SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON BRUCE EDWARY)S Phone No. 860-870-9100
Address475 Talcottville Road Vernon CT 06066 22 /
Site Name Shady Brook. Village P&Z No.^
Owner Shady Brook Assoc,# LLC Phone No. 860-870-9100
Contractor Shady Brook Assoc. , LLB
Signature of Owner Date:. 8/26/04
Signature of Design Engr. Date: 8/26/04
CHANGE: (Describe location and nature .of ;change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
To relocate the proposed sidewalk od the easterly side of Bailey
Circle for aoo.roximately the first 200' to be 3.50 (Af the face
of curb.
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
To increase the distance between the rear of the sidewalk and the
property line of Florence Wilton to enable landscaping
APPROVALS: (As Required)
' ir. Of Planning / / �`` Date: /�/ /}
Town Engineer w 6,zv Date:
Dir. of Public VWxks Date:
Others Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department
v 3 J� ZP
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL: 4
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON � Phone No.291-1
955
Address ✓el. kS S-SMavim� mb 1AIND&U ^r 040A +
Site Name P&Z No.
Owner Si-hA V R9&L A 1A-1SS Z-,C Phone No.920= 2to
Contractor C
Signature of Owner Date:
Signature of Design En Date: /1
CHANGE: (Describe location an ture of change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
7' ON x �f'
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
-m P u J cbe I'`3'1 U z AfeA ON W ES E S W E FILL RAN rial
APPROVALS: (As Re fired)
Dir. Of Planning Date: � ) ( joy
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public Works Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
White - Town Engineer Yellow ..- Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
o 3 - /9 RECEIVED
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors AUG U 9 2004
landscape architects ♦ gis ♦ gps SOUTH WINDSO
R PLANNING DEPT,
August 9, 2004
Ms. Marcia Banach
Director of Planning
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
RE: Shady Brook Village DPI Proj. No. 1123
South Windsor, Connecticut
Dear Ms. Banach,
As per my conversation with Michele Lipe this morning, please be advised that we are no
longer working for Bruce Edwards or Shady Brook Associates, LLC. We are requesting that any
plans used by Brian Edwards or Shady Brook Associates, LLC, prepared by Design Professionals,
Inc., not be accepted as we consider these plans to be our property. Thank you.
Sincerely,
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS INC.
ct-
By. —
Richar . artel, P.E., L.S.
cc: Peter R. DeMallie
Mary Rossettie
165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax: (860)291-8757
Email:dpicivil@aol.com
Memorandum
DATE: September 28, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Marcia A. Banach,Director of Planning
RE: BONDS
SITE Bond
APPLICATION AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE
03-2 1 P, Shady Brook SRD $470,970 $343,236 $127,734
1�-
i;
t0
( av
w-�
CityPlace II
185 Asylum Street,5th Floor
Date: September 29, 2004
Hartford,CT 06103-3494
Town of South Windsor WEBSTER BANK
Planning&Zoning Commission
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
We hereby establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 10115 in your favor at the request and by
order of Shady Brook Associates, LLC—475 Talcottville Road,Vernon, CT 06066, effective today,
available by your draft(s) drawn on us at sight, for sum not exceeding in total the aggregate amount of
One Hundred Ten Thousand and 00/100 United State Dollars(US$110,000.00), accompanied by:
original Letter of Credit and an(1) they amendments thereto; and
(2) "The amount of the draft represents fund due the Town of South Windsor as a result of
nonperformance or unsatisfactory performance of Site Development Improvements
authorized by the Town of South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission Letter of
Approval dated April 25, 2003 RE: App 03-12P, Shady Brook Village Senior Residence
Development, request for special exception to Section 4.1.12 and site plan for a 20 unit
residence development located on property on the northerly side of Strong Road, easterly
of Main Street, A-40 zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professional, Inc., Job
No. 1123, dated April 4, 2003 as revised."
Draft(s) and documents must be dated and presented to Webster Bank,National Association,
CityPlace II—5"'Floor, 185 Asylum Street, Hartford, CT 06103-3494 not later than September 28,
2005 or any automatically extended dated set forth herein.
This Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for an additional period of one year
from the present or each future expiration date unless we have notified you in writing, not
less than thirty(30) days before such expiration date, that we elect not to renew this Letter of
Credit. Our notice of such election shall be sent by express, registered or certified mail to the
above address. Notwithstanding the above, this Letter of Credit may not be
automatically extended beyond September 28, 2009 ("its final expiration date").
Draft(s) drawn hereunder must be marked: "Drawn under Webster Bank Letter of Credit No.
10115."
We hereby agree with you that draft drawn under and in compliance with the terms and conditions of
this Credit will be duly honored.
Cx e so far as o herwise ed,this credit is subject to the"Uniform Customs and Practice for
Docum ntar C e ' s (1 93 evision), International Chamber of Commerce Brochure NO. 500."
i
D-4to
Int ational a king O i /
uthorized Officer
C>/
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 9 1 2--9 Ib 4
CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER CA )LAs-s6c
NAME & ADDRESS S T� C.fl T t
e�� ►���, C�i 0 10 0 ( t,
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS.,±22 LOT
SUBDIVISION C
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER
_AMOUNT OF BOND_j
aJ
CHECK NUMBER
DEPARTMENT
SUBMITTED BY
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FINANCE ,y� �1 4 oq
NAME DA E
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 56 0 6 4,
S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc
�aW N Sf4
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR.CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
October 4,2004
Mr. Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: App103-12P., Shady Brook Village SRD Bond Reduction
Dear Mr. Edwards:
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on September 28, 2004, to
reduce the site bond for the above-referenced project from$470,970.00 to $127,734.00.
Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at
your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman
Planning&Zoning Commission
THW/kak
Enclosure
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
for
SHADY BROOK VILLAGE
AD
PROPOSED FOR STRONG ROAD
by
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES, LLC
Prepared By
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, Connecticut
(860) 657-3579
S
February 2003
Table of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................1
ExistingConditions.................................................................................................1
ExistingTraffic Volumes......................................................................................2
Accidents.............................................................................................................2
ProjectGenerated Traffic.......................................................................................3
CapacityAnalyses...................................................................................................4
SiteAccess..............................................................................................................5
Conclusions.............................................................................................................7
List of Tables
Table 1 Trip Generation - Senior Housing (16 Detached and
4 Attached Homes)....................................................................................5
T able 2 Trip Generation - Standard Housing (16 Detached
and 4 Attached Homes)............................................................................5
Table 3 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses ........................................5
Table 4 Available Intersection Sight Distances vs. ConnDOT
Guidelines................................................................................................................6
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOG I
INTRODUCTION
Shady Brook Associates, LLC proposes to construct Shady Brook Village, a
20-Unit (16 detached homes and four attached homes) Senior Residential
Community on approximately 11.85 acres located along the northerly side of
Strong Road in South Windsor, Connecticut. The homes will be occupied by
"Seniors"who are at least 55 years old and remain able to care for
themselves, but are seeking a home with lower maintenance requirements.
This report was prepared by Traffic Engineering Solutions to address the
traffic impact on roadways surrounding this Senior Residential community.
The following scope of work was included in this study:
■ Making 24-hour directional machine counts on Strong Road in the
vicinity of the site. The count included a speed study to determine
the 85th percentile speed of travel in each direction on Strong Road
(85th percentile speed was used to determine the intersection and
stopping sight distances needed for vehicles entering and leaving the
site);
■ Obtaining from the Town of South Windsor traffic accident data for
the latest three year period for Strong Road in the vicinity of the site;
■ Making Visual Observations of roadways and land use conditions
along Strong Road;
■ Determining the number of trips expected to be added to the
roadway system by the proposed 20 Senior Residential Units;
■ Completing morning and afternoon peak hour capacity analyses for
the intersection of Strong Road and the site access road to
determine the anticipated operating Level of Service (LOS) for the
traffic volumes expected upon completion of Shady Brook Village;
■ Field measuring the sight distances available for drivers entering and
leaving Shady Brook Village and comparing these distances with the
Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Intersection and Stopping Sight
Distances for the 85th percentile speeds along Strong Road;
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed Shady Brook Village is a Senior Residential Development with
16 Single Family homes and four attached units. The development is
proposed for approximately 11.85 acres located along the north side of
Strong Road in South Windsor, Connecticut. The majority of the site is
situated behind existing single family homes along the northerly side of
Strong Road. The site has 200 feet of frontage along Strong Road at the
westerly end of the site and a 50-foot frontage at the easterly end of the site.
Access to Shady Brook Village will be provided within the 50-foot frontage
which is located midway between Bancroft Lane and Gorski Drive. The
access road will be constructed to Town standards and is proposed to be a
private road. The property is presently undeveloped. Visual observations
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC 1
were made and traffic counts obtained for the Strong Road in the vicinity of
the site.
Strong Road runs west to east with one lane of travel in each direction.
The road begins at Main Street and continues easterly for about three and
one half miles to its intersection with Pierce Road. West of Main Street a
single lane road continues through agricultural fields to the Connecticut
River. The site is located about midway between Main Street and John Fitch
Boulevard (Route 5). Strong Road is typically 25 feet wide in the vicinity of
the site with 12.5-foot lanes and no shoulders in each direction. A double
yellow center line separates the two directions of travel. Between John Fitch
Boulevard and Main Street, Strong Road is straight. Strong Road is also
nearly flat from John Fitch Boulevard to 300 feet west of the site access
road where Strong Road goes downhill as it proceeds toward Main Street.
Strong Road has a slight upgrade as it approaches Bancroft Lane from the
east and crests just west of Bancroft Lane where it begins a slight
downgrade as it continues toward the west. The posted speed limit on
Strong Road is 30 miles per hour(mph). Land use from Main Street to just
west of!dent Road is single family residential. The Forest Village (along
Bancroft Lane and Gorski Drive) is more than two-thirds built with 27 of the
39 homes completed and occupied. From just west of Ident Road to Route
j 5, there is a mixture of industrial and commercial uses. Strong Road
intersects Main Street approximately 700 feet west of the site and John Fitch
Boulevard (Route 5) approximately 800 feet east of the site. The
intersection of Strong Road at Main Street is STOP controlled on all
approaches and the intersection of Strong Road with Route 5 is controlled
by a traffic signal.
Existing Traffic Volumes
Twenty-four hour automatic traffic recorder(ATR) counts were made from
Noon on January 15 to Noon on January 16, 2003 along Strong Road for
this study. The counts were done just west of the intersection with Bancroft
Lane and included the traffic count and speeds of each vehicle traveling on
Strong Road.
The ATR count indicates there are 527 vehicles traveling Strong Road near
the site (this compares with 511 vehicles per day counted for the 1998 study
completed for the earlier proposal for this site). During the morning peak
hour(7:00 AM to 8:00 AM) 36 vehicles traveled Strong Road (26 traveled
eastbound and 10 traveling westbound). The highest hour during the
afternoon period occurred from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM. During this hour, the
traffic volume on Strong Road was 41 vehicles (21 traveling eastbound and
20 traveling westbound).
The speed study indicates that the 85th percentile speed (the speed at
which 85 percent of all vehicles travel at or less than) is 43 miles per hour
(mph) for vehicles traveling in the westbound direction and 43 mph for
vehicles traveling eastbound. The 85th percentile speed was used to
determine the required intersection and stopping sight distances.
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC 2
Accidents
The South Windsor Police Department provided a summary of traffic
accidents for Strong Road between Main Street and John Fitch Boulevard.
The accident information covered the three year period from January 1,
2000 through December 31, 2002. During this three year period there were
twenty-three accidents reported along the section of Strong Road. Fifteen
of the reported accidents occurred at or near the intersection with John Fitch
Boulevard and five of the reported accidents occurred between Ident Road
and Main Street. The accident records did not indicate the exact location of
the remaining three accidents. It should be noted that five of the accidents
(more than twenty percent of the accidents) involved drivers striking a deer
in the road. The police Department indicated that there is no pattern of
accidents at any location that would suggest the need for remediation along
Strong Road.
PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC
New trips to the roadway system generated by the proposed Shady Brook
Village were determined from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
reference, Trip Generation'. The ITE reference has established
mathematical relationships based on studies of various land uses to
determine their trip generation rates. These trip generation relationships
have been standardized and published in the Trip Generation reference.
The proposed 20 Senior Residential Homes are being developed for
"Seniors"who are at least 55 years old. The ITE reference provides trip
generation information for several related land uses for senior housing
including: "Retirement Community", "Elderly Housing—Attached" and
"Elderly Housing — Detached". The ITE reference also provides trip
generation information for standard housing including "Residential
Condominium/Townhouse" and "Single-Family Detached Housing".
The trips generated by the 16 Detached Homes and 4 Multi-Unit Homes
were calculated for Senior Housing and Standard Housing to provide a
comparison of the number of trips Senior and Standard housing would
generate. The trip generation was based on Land Use Codes 251 - "Elderly
Housing— Detached", 253- "Elderly Housing—Attached", 210- "Single
Family Detached Housing" and 230—`Residential Condominium
/Townhouse". The following trip generation relationships were used to
determine the number of daily, and morning and afternoon peak hour trips
that would be generated by the proposed Shady Brook Village Senior
Residential Community and by a similar size standard residential
development. The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
' Trip Generation Sixth Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REP0RT2.D0C 3
Senior Housing
Elderly Housing— Detached (16 Homes)
Average Weekday Trips Not Available
Morning Peak Hour 0.21 Trips per Unit 36/64
Afternoon Peak Hour 0.23 Trips per Unit 64/36
where T is the number of trips and X the number of detached homes
Elderly Housing —Attached (4 Units)
Average Weekday Trips 3.48 Trips per Unit
Morning Peak Hour 0.07 Trips per Unit 63/37
Afternoon Peak Hour 0.10 Trips per Unit 59/41
Standard Housing
Single-Family Detached Housing (16 Homes)
Average Weekday Trips Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707
Morning Peak Hour T = 0.700 (X) + 9.477 25/75
Afternoon Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.901 Ln(X) + 0.527 64/36
where T is the number of trips and X the number of detached homes
Residential Condominium/Townhouse (4 Units)
Average Weekday Trips Ln(T) = 0.850 Ln(X) + 2.564
Morning Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.790 Ln(X) + 0.298 17/83
Afternoon Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.827 Ln(X) + 0.309 67/33
where T is the number of trips and X the number of condominium
units
Table 1 -Trip Generation - Senior Housing
Trips Entering Trips Leaving
16 Units 4 Units Total 16 Units 4 Units Total
Detached Attached Detached Attached
Morning Peak 1 Nil 1 2 Nil 2
Hour
Afternoon Peak 2 Nil 2 1 Nil 1
Hour
C:1BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOG 4
Table 2 - TripGeneration - Standard Housing
9
Trips Entering Trips Leaving
16 Units 4 Units Total 16 Units 4 Units Total
Detached Attached Detached Attached
Daily 96 21 117 96 21 117
Morning Peak 5 1 6 16 3 19
Hour
Afternoon Peak 13 3 16 7 1 8
Hour
Tables 1 and 2 show that the number of trips generated on a daily basis and
during the peak hours is considerably less for Senior Housing than for the
same size residential community with no age restrictions. Because many
people continue working well past their fifty-fifth birthday, and since the trip
generation information for residential uses with no age restrictions is higher
(more conservative), the Trip Generation estimates for standard housing
were used for the proposed 20 Unit Shady Brook Village Senior Residential
Community. The capacity analyses completed for this study used the higher
number of generated.trips present in Table 2 to provide a conservative
(worst case) evaluation of the operating Levels of Service.
CAPACITY ANALYSES
Capacity Analyses were done to determine the anticipated quality of traffic
operations at the intersection of Strong Road at the site access road. Letter
designations from A to F are used to represent the Levels of Service (LOS)
for the traffic operation at each intersection or roadway, with LOS A
representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Typically,
LOS D is considered acceptable by ConnDOT for design peak hour
conditions. The Level of Service for unsignalized intersections with STOP
control on the minor street assumes that through and right-turning traffic on
the main street is not affected by traffic on the side street(s). Thus, the LOS
designation is for the movements on the side street and the left-turn
movement from the main street onto the side street. Levels of Service are
defined by the average delay per vehicle as indicated below.
Unsignalized Intersections
Level of Service Avg. Delay/Vehicle (in Seconds)
LOS A < 10.0
LOSB > 10.0 and < 15.0
LOS C > 15.0 and < 25.0
LOS D > 25.0 and < 35.0
LOS E > 35.0 and < 50.0
LOS F > 50.0
C:\BUSINESSIB&M\REPORT2.€ OC 5
Level-of-service capacity analyses completed for the 2005 Build
P Y Y were
conditions for Strong Road at the site access road. The 2005 traffic
volumes were determined by applying a two percent growth factor(totaling
104.04% growth for two years) to the 2003 traffic volumes to account for
growth that may occur in the area, though background growth is not likely
because of the surrounding roadway system is relatively isolated from
through traffic that does not originate within the neighborhood. The year
2005 analyses assume a two year buildout for the Shady Brook Village
Residential Community. The generated trips were assigned to the
intersection of Strong Road at the site access road assuming that all the
new trips would travel to and from each direction on Strong Road. This
provides a conservative estimate of the site impact by adding twice the
anticipated new trips to the surrounding roadway system. The results of the
analyses are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2005 Build
Location Peak Hour Delay LOS
Strong Road at Site
Access Road
E-Bd Left Turn 7.2 A
AM
S-Bd Site Road 8.8 A
E-Bd Left Turn PM 7.3 A
S-Bd Site Road 8.9 A
Delay = Average stopped delay, in seconds, to all vehicles entering the
intersection or to vehicles making the specified turn.
Table 2 shows that the new intersection created by the site access road and
Strong Road will operate at an excellent Level of Service A for vehicles
entering and leaving the Shady Brook Village Senior Residential
Community.
i
SITE ACCESS
The proposed access road to Shady Brook Village will be located along the
north side of Strong Road midway between Bancroft Lane and Gorski Drive.
Visual observations and sight distance measurements were made at the
location of the site access road to determine the Intersection Sight Distances
and sight distances for Stopped Vehicle Turning Left Across Oncoming
Traffic. Intersection Sight Distances (the distance drivers leaving Shady
Brook Village will be able to see in either direction along Strong Road)were
measured at a distance of 10 feet off the edge of road with a 3.5 foot height
of eye and height of object in accordance with ConnDOT Standards for
determining Intersection Sight Distances. The sight distance looking left
(east) from the access road is 355 feet(restricted by the slight vertical curve
in Strong Road just west of Bancroft Lane). The access road has been
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC 6
i
designed to provide a positive grade increased elevation for the first fifteen
g p P 9 ( )
feet before dropping at a one percent grade into the site. Using a profile of
Strong Road prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. we found that with this
grading, along with clearing or thinning the trees and shrubs immediately
east of the access road along the north edge of Strong Road, the sight
1 distance available to drivers leaving the site will be more than 500 feet when
looking toward the left. The sight distance looking to the right (west)will be
470 feet. This sight distance is achieved by trimming the shrubs in front of
No. 90 Strong Road below three feet or removing them from the edge of
road. A sight distance beyond 470 feet is restricted by the hill on Strong
Road west of Gorski Drive. The Intersection Sight Distance for Stopped
Vehicle Turning Left Across Oncoming Traffic at the access road is 355 feet
and the stopping sight distance for vehicles approaching from the rear of the
turning vehicle is 450 feet. The posted speed limit along Strong Road is 30
miles per hour(mph), and the 85th percentile speed on Strong Road is 43
mph in both directions.
The Connecticut DOT presents Minimum and Upper standards for
intersection sight distances (ISD) in their January 1999 Highway Design
Manual. The ConnDOT guidelines are presented in metric, which required
that the prevailing speeds be converted to kilometers per hour. Figure 11-
' 2D of the ConnDOT Guidelines presents ISD information for each 10 kph
increment for speeds between 40 and 100 kph. Table 3 presents the
intersection sight distances that will be available to drivers leaving the site,
and the minimum and desirable sight distances presented in the Connecticut
DOT Highway Design Manual for the 85th percentile speeds for traffic
traveling Strong Road.
Table 3 -Available Intersection Sight Distances vs. ConnDOT
Guidelines
Connecticut DOT Design
Guidelines2
Field Measured Minimum Upper Intersection
Intersection Sight Intersection Sight Sight Distance
Distance Distance
Looking Right 470 Feet 423 Feet 595 Feet
Looking Left > 500 Feet 423 Feet 595 Feet
Table 3 shows that the sight distance lookingtoward the left and right from
9
then site access road onto Strong Road will fall between the Minimum and
Upper intersection sight distances for the observed 85th percentile speed of
travel (43 mph) on Strong Road. The intersection sight distances for drivers
leaving Shady Brook Village will be more than 150 feet greater than the 305
2 Determined from the ConnDOT High=way Design Manual for 43.0 mph travel speeds on Strong
Road as determined from the January 15 and 16, 2003 speed study.
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC 7
foot intersection sight distance available to drivers looking left from Gorski
Drive onto Strong Road.
A second sight distance measured for this study is for Stopped Vehicle
Turning Left Across Oncoming Traffic. According to Figure 11-2F of the
ConnDOT Guidelines, vehicles turning left from Strong Road onto the site
access road should be able to see 333 feet. The 355 feet available to
drivers making this left turn from Strong Road onto the site access road is
greater than the distance required by the ConnDOT reference for vehicles
approaching from the opposite direction at the 85th percentile speed of 43
mph. The Stopping Sight Distance for vehicles approaching from the rear of
the vehicle turning left onto the site access road should be approximately
380 feet. The available Stopping Sight Distance (more than 450 feet) is also
greater than the required Stopping Sight Distance.
All sight distances available to drivers entering and leaving the proposed site
access road are greater than the Minimum standards presented in the
Connecticut DOT Highway Design Manual for the prevailing travel speeds
on Strong Road. Therefore, the available intersection and stopping sight
distances combined with the low volume of traffic on Strong Road will allow
vehicles to safely enter and leave the Senior Residential Community.
Conclusions
Shady Brook Village, a 20-unit Senior Residential Development with 16
detached homes and four attached homes, is proposed for a 11.85-acre site
located along the north side of Strong Road in the vicinity of Bancroft Lane
and Gorski Drive. The development is proposed to provide housing for
Seniors who wish to move from a larger single family home to a new home
with lower maintenance requirements. Access to Shady Brook Village will
be provided within a 50-foot frontage which is located midway between
Bancroft Lane and Gorski Drive. The access road will be constructed to
Town standards and is proposed to be a private road. The trip generation
information included in the ITE Trip Generation reference contains
information for Retirement Communities and Elderly Housing developments.
Because the trips generated by these land uses is less than the trips
generated by Single Family Detached Housing and Residential
Condominium/Townhouse developments, and many people continue to
work beyond their fifty-fifth birthday, the traffic impact from Shady Brook
Village was determined by using the trip generation information for Single
Family Detached Housing and Residential Condominium/Townhouse
developments. This provides the most conservative approach for evaluating
the impact from the proposed Shady Brook Village .
The study assumed that the residential development would be constructed
over a period of two years. Capacity analyses were done for the
intersection of Strong Road at site access road for the year 2005 Build
conditions. Levels of Service are expected to be LOS A for all movements
entering and leaving the site. All sight distances available to drivers entering
and leaving the proposed site access road are greater than the Minimum
standards presented in the Connecticut DOT Highway Design Manual for
C:\BUSiNESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC 8
the prevailing travel speeds on Strong Road. Therefore, the available
intersection and stopping sight distances combined with the low volume of
traffic on Strong Road will allow vehicles to safely enter and leave the Senior
Residential Community.
Since traffic operations are expected to be an excellent Level of Service A at
the new intersection of Strong Road and the site access road, and the
intersection and stopping sight distances exceed the minimum criteria
established by ConnDOT for the 85th percentile speeds on Strong Road, no
offsite improvements other than the clearing to provide the sight distances
are suggested as a result of the added traffic generated by the proposed
Shady Brook Village with 20 Senior Residential Homes (16 detached and 4
attached homes).
C:\BUSINESS\B&M\REPORT2.DOC
Z
W
Q
2003 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
"onneeut Counfs Inc.
63 Sugar Maple Lane
Strong Road West Of Bancroft Lane Kensington, Connecticut 06037 Site Code: 180
SNET#2204 Station ID:
South Windsor, Connecticut
Eastbound Latitude: 0.000
start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 9999 Total Percent Percent
01/15/03 w « w w « « « x « x w x w x x « «
01:00 w w « w « w w « w « « w « x « w x
02:00 « x w x « w x x x w w w w w « x x
03:00 w « w « w « w « w w « x « w w x x
04:00 x « w « w x w x x w « « x x w « «
05:00 w w w w w w w « « w « « w « w x w
06:00 x w x x « w w « x « x « x w w « «
07:00 * « « w w « w « « x w x w « w « w
08:00 x w x w « w « x w « x w w « x « w
09:00 w « w w w x w w w w « w « w « w x
10:00 x « w w w x x x x x w w « w w « w
11:00 w x « w « w w w w x w « w w w w w
12 PM 5 0 2 0 14 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 42 46
13:00 0 0 4 3 7 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 42 45
14:00 0 1 0 4 3 5 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 46 51
15:00 0 0 2 4 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 43 48
16:00 1 0 0 4 8 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 40 48
17:00 0 0 2 1 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 43 46
18:00 1 1 2 6 7 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 40 46
19:00 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 46 46
20:00 0 0 4 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 41 41
21:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 45 45
22:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 20
23:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30 30
Total 7 3 16 25 54 37 25 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 179
Percent 3.9% 1.7% 8.9% 14.0% 30.2% 20.7% 14.0% 6.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AM Peak —
Volume _ ___
PM Peak 12:00 14:00 13:00 18:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 12:00 -14:00 12:00
Volume 5 1 4 6 14 10 7 2 1 30
Page 1
onnecticut Coun s Inc.
63 Sugar Maple Lane
Strong Road West Of Bancroft Lane Kensington, Connecticut 06037 Site Code: 180
SNET#2204 Station ID:
South Windsor, Connecticut
Eastbound Latitude: 0.000
Start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 9999 Total Percent Percent
01/16/03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 30
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 30
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 40
05:00 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 38 40
06:00 0 0 1 9 3 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 44 48
07:00 0 0 2 6 5 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 42 45
08:00 0 1 2 2 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 42 44
09:00 0 0 3 2 4 5 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 45 48
10:00 0 0 0 2 5 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 43 45
11:00 0 0 0 2 4 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 44 48
12 PM w w « x w w w w x w x w w w w w w
13:00 w « w « « « « w « w w w w « w x «
14:00 w w w w w w w w w « w w w x « « w
15:00 w w w « w w w w w w w w x w w w «
16:00 w w w w w w w x w w w w w x w w x
17:00 « w w x « « w « x « « « « w x « x
18:00 w w w w x w w x x w « w w x x w x
19:00 « « w « « « « « « « w w w « w w w
20:00 x w x x x x w w w x w w w x x x w
21:00 w « « w w « * x w w w x x w « x w
22:00 w x w w « w w w x x w w w x w w x
23:00
Total 0 2 9 26 26 34 27 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
Percent 0.0% 1.5% 6.8% 19.7% 19.7% 25.8% 20.5% 6.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AM Peak 05:00 09:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 06:00 07:00
Volume 1 3 9 5 8 6 2 26
PM Peak
Volume
Grand 7 5 25 51 80 71 52 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 311
Total
Percent 1.6% 8.0% 16.4% 25.7% 22.8% 16.7% 6.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Statistics 15th Percentile: 26 MPH
50th Percentile: 35 MPH
85th Percentile: 43 MPH
95th Percentile: 47 MPH
Statistics Mean Speed(Average): 34 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH
Number in Pace: 151
Percent in Pace: 48.6%
Number of Vehicles>30 MPH: 220
Percent of Vehicles>30 MPH: 70.7%
Page 2
M " "
onnec scut Coun s Inc.
63 Sugar Maple Lane
Strong Road West Of Bancroft Lane Kensington, Connecticut 06037 Site Code: 180
SNET#2204 Station ID:
South Windsor, Connecticut
Westbound Latitude: 0.000
start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 9999 Total Percent Percent
01/15/03 * * * * * *
01:00 « * * « « * * «
04:00 * * « * * * * * * «
05:00 « * * « « « « « * * «
06:00 * * * * * «
07:00 * * « * * « « «
08:00 * * *
09:00 « * * « « * «
10:00 * * * « * *
11:00 * « * « * « * * « « « «
12 PM 0 0 0 1 5 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 42 44
13:00 1 0 1 2 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 42 44
14:00 1 0 0 0 2 8 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 45 56
15:00 1 1 1 2 5 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 40 48
16:00 0 0 0 3 4 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 44 45
17:00 1 0 1 3 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 40 43
18:00 0 1 0 0 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 46
19:00 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 41 41
20:00 0 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 46 51
21:00 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 39 40
22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 45 45
23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 40
Total 4 3 4 16 34 52 25 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 146
Percent 2.7% 2.1% 2.7% 11.0% 23.3% 35.6% _ 17.1% 4.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AM Peak
Volume __
PM Peak 13:00 15:00 13:00 16:00 18:00 12:00 16:00 15:00 20:00 14:00 15:00
Volume 1 1 1 3 6 8 6 2 1 1 21
Page 3
ar r r r r onnec Icu r W r +� r air r� r r r �■■�
t Co Inc.
63 Sugar Maple Lane
Strong Road West Of Bancroft Lane Kensington, Connecticut 06037 Site Code: 180
SNET#2204 Station ID:
South Windsor, Connecticut
Westbound Latitude: 0.000
Start 0 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 85th 95th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 9999 Total Percent Percent
01/16/03 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 30 35
01;00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 40
02:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 25
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 40 40
07:00 0 0 0 0 1 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 43 46
08:00 1 0 1 0 5 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 42 45
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 43 45
10:00 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 53 55
11:00 0 0 0 2 2 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 42 45
12 PM w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
13:00 w w * w w * w w w w
14:00 w w w w w w w w w w w w * w w w w
15:00 w w w w w w w w + w w w w w w w w
16:00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
17:00 w w w w w w w w w w w * w w w w w
18:00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
19:00
20:00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
21:00 w w w w * w w w w w w w w w w w w
22:00 w w w w x w w w w w w w w w w w w
23:00 w w w w w • w w * w w w w w w w :
Total 1 1 4 6 15 27 11 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 70
Percent 1.4% 1.4% 5.7% 8.6% 21.4% 38.6% 15.7% 4.3% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AM Peak 08:00 06:00 00:00 00:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 10:00 08:00
Volume 1 1 1 2 5 9 3 1 2 17
PM Peak
Volume
Grand 5 4 8 22 49 79 36 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 216
Total
Percent 1.9% 3.7% 10.2% 22.7% 36.6% 16.7% 4.2% 1.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Statistics 15th Percentile: 29 MPH
50th Percentile: 37 MPH
85th Percentile: 43 MPH
95th Percentile: 47 MPH
Statistics Mean Speed(Average): 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH
Number in Pace: 128
Percent in Pace: 59.3%
Number of Vehicles>30 MPH: 180
Percent of Vehicles>30 MPH: 83.3%
Page 4
' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
� CAPACITY ANALYSES
� 2005 BUILD CONDITIONS
Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 of t
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
mineral ltfct ' U ste t 'artr�aion.
' Analyst BAH Intersection Strong Road at Access Road
Agency/Co. Traffic Engineering Solutions Jurisdiction South Wndsor
Date Performed 1/17/2003 Analysis Year 2005 Budd ConaMons
' Analysis Time Period AM Peak
Project Description Shady Brook Wage Senior Residential 222 un'
East/West Street: Strong Road 114orthlSouth Street: Site Access Road
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs: 0.25
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
' L T R L T R
Volume 6 27 0 0 10 6
Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
' Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 8 36 0 0 13 8
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Median Type Undvided
' RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
' Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 0 0 0 19 0 19
Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 0 25 0 25
' Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade(%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
' Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
.4r o f Lem of.S+enrl€e
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v(vph) 8 50
' C(m)(vph) 1608 998
v/c 0.00 0.05
' 95%queue length 0.01 0.16
Control Delay 7.2 8.8
LOS A A
Approach Delay - e 8.8
Approach LOS A
HCS2000Tm Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c
' file:HC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k8032.TW 02/24/2003
Two-Way Stop Control rage i of i
t
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
�ier�i Ei�f�irmation'- �tt�-.lip# 1atn.
' Analyst BAH Intersection Strong Road at Access Road
Agency/Co. Traffic Engineering Solutions Jurisdiction South Wndsor
Date Performed 111712003 Analysis Year 2005 Bind Conditions
' Analysis Time Period PM Peak
Project Description Shady Brook Wage Senior Residential Commun
East/West Street: Strong Road I North/South Street: Site Access Road
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period Mrs): 0.25
�I��I�fi�o[umes wind Adjusl�menfs , _ y :- , .
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
' L T R L T R
Volume 16 22 0 0 21 16
Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 21 29 0 0 28 21
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Median Type Undvided
' RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
' L T R L T R
Volume 0 0 0 8 0 8
Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 D 0 10 0 10
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade(%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 1 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
[ � .:.; ` aerial LeXct of SenriCe
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v(vph) 21 20
C(m)(vph) 1571 954
V/c 0.01 0.02
' 95%queue length 0.04 0.06
Control Delay 7.3 8.9
LOS A A
' Approach Delay - A 8.9
Approach LOS A
HC52000- Copyright 0 20M University of Florida AH Rights Reserved Version 4.1 c
' file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k8310.TMP 02/24/2003
RECEIVE®
TOWN OF SOUTH- INOSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
MAY
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT.
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON_,„no Edwards Phone No- 870-9100 :
Address 475 Talcotty As Road, Vernon, CT 06066
Site. Name Shady Brook Village P&Z No. Q.3"'
Owner Shady Brook Assoc. , LLC Phone No. 870-9100
Contractor Shady Brook Assoc., LLC
Signature of Owner Date: 5/2/05
01
Signature of Design Engr. Date: 5/2/05
CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
Create a 1 ' - 3' high berm behind Units 1 4
h
on the easterl
y sid
e f the
Proposed row of ad� arvitae along Y
entrance drive.
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
To enhance the proposed landscaping and improve the buffer;
: between the units and the. existing residences on Strong, Road.
APPROVALS: (As Required,)
Dr. Of Planning K'�i' >� c� L.� Date: r:- J �-
Town Engineer t/ill A-- /, v J �"� Date:
Dir. of Public W rk Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
Tub l �or� � � eV� �� f rt, et
IT Gi �.
White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant ;
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
10 ViN SC
co
* F
�� 0 v&U&01t
° 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
f�OSOR'C° TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
August 1, 2005
Mr. Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates LLC
475 Talcottville Road.
Vernon, CT 06066
Re: Expiring Letter of Credit, Appl#03-12P, Shady brook SRD
Dear Mr. Edwards:
The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit:
PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXP. TYPE
Shadybrook Webster $110,000.00 9/29/05 Site
In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must
have an amendment.to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a
one-year period from the expiration date. Kindly forward us the amendment at your earliest
possible opportunity.
Very truly yours
Michele R. Lipe
Assistant Director of Planning
MRL/rfs
/ �\
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
DEC 2 8 2005
SOUTH
September 15, 2005
Attn: Michelle Lipe
Town of South Windsor,Planning Dept.
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Michelle:
We will be modifying the deck on 44 Bailey Circle as soon as possible in order to
meet the zoning requirement of having 20'between buildings. We are submitting a bond
of$2500 with this letter in order to ensure that this work is done.
Sincerely,
Bruce Edwards
Site Supervisor
e,c(
��✓t! A
475 TALCOTTVILLE ROAD • ,
PHONE: (860) 870-9100 • FAX: (860) 870-5700
CT REG. #5695
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 113�a$
APPLICANT NAME G�C�f.t ,K A S s oc . L (_._C
ADDRESS C-0 4tVj' `j -r Oa
- VP/V u d e, y io
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS 3&A4 LOT
SUBDIVISION S�,5z S�J
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER (�
0 zs
AMOUNT OF BOND )o _ 000
CHECK NUMBER 1 -]B 35(j q
DEPARTMENT lo, y, V1 I n !�
SUBMITTED BY Lh6C-�1,c to 13105--
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FINANCE 10 / t/���
NAME DATE
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER
HAPlanning Department\Holmes\forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL 08-27-0l.doc
MEMORANDUM
4 To: Bruce Edwards
From: Jeff Doolittle, Town Engineer
Bernie Drabek, Engineering Assistant
Date: November 15, 2005
Subject: Punch List for Shady Brook SRD
Based on a site inspection on 11/8/2005 the following items need to be completed:
11. Berm needs outlet pipes installed at rear of units 2 &3.
2. Grates on outlet structures need to be bolted down.
3. Clean tar &debris on grates of catch basins and remove filter fabric.
4. 15"ADS pipe in CB #7 and #8 need to be cut flush to inside of structure.
5. Ponding at units 5 & 17 - fix grading to drain properly.
6. Trees in gravel access road need to be removed or relocated.
7. Line stripe parking spaces at cul-de-sac.
8. Back up curbs at low spots with soil and seed.
,9. Remove temporary electric phone service in Island of cul-de-sac where the trailer
was located. nn I
S? A / ^t- &e4ti 0.. sov� ^5 t4cj to rtF a ew:l�j4-f6/,,� PeA AtJC.
_Show the following on the As-Builts: 60,4ill e, '0 1y
1. Show gas valve on units 2 &4.
2. Show flared ends & plunge pool at both detention basins. V/ -,
3. Show gravel access drive to both detention basins. V/
4. Label stop bar and stop sign at Strong Road & line stripe.
cc: Project File
BJD/cm
engineering/molloy/punchlist Joseph lane Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date i pages►
From �„p
r
. '=�✓A/c_� Gn.Ac�E � S`�=A t?�.�5 LE; G1;3T�w�-L �41 �t(nfLt/Y� (
Co./Dept. Co.
Phone# Phone#
Fax# 1-1 O 5 1 �6 Fax# 1 A
01/04/2006 WED 09:09 FAX 860 644 7280 South Windsor Town Hall 10001
*** FAX TX REPORT ***
*********************
TRANSMISSION OK
JOB NO. 0633
DESTINATION ADDRESS 98705700
PSWD/SUBADDRESS
DESTINATION ID
ST. TIME 01/04 09:08
USAGE T 00' 34
PGS. 1
RESULT OK
MEMORANDUM
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer
Bernie Drabek, Engineering Assistant
Date: November 15, 2005
Subject: Punch List for Shady Brook SRD
Based on a site inspection on 11/8/2005 the following items need to be completed:
/1. Berm needs outlet pipes installed at rear of units 2&3.
2. Grates on outlet structures need to be bolted down.
3. Clean tar&debris on grates of catch basins and remove filter fabric.
4. 15"ADS pipe in CB #7 and #8 need to be cut flush to inside of structure.
S. Ponding at units 5&17- fix grading to drain properly.
6. Trees in gravel access road need to be removed or relocated.
7. Line stripe parking spaces at cul-de-sac.
8. Back up curbs at low spots with soil and seed.
9. Remove temporary electric phone service in Island of cul-de-sac where the trailer
was located. �}
_. SiSJi N^t G'/Ccl1%+g o.. S¢�,n5 Ita.aci7 tJ rL`aic 6o..try&&rcl-c peA Air- aPr,
_Show the following on the As-Bail S: �,,��;,�,e•, ,r ��
1. Show gas valve on units 2&4.
2. Show flared ends&plunge pool at both detention basins.
3. Show gravel access drive to both detention basins. V/
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
DEC 9 - 2005
December 8, 2005 SOUTH INN DSOR,[.,'[.r
Attn: Michelle Lipe,Planning Dept.
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Michelle:
As you are aware, the Shady Brook Village Condo Association has requested that four
trees be removed along one of the gravel access drives. They were concerned about
maintaining the size of the trees with their proximity to the gravel access drive. These
trees were located behind Lot 17 and between Lots 5 & 18. They were relocated to the
berm behind Lots 1-4.
If you have any questions,please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Bruce Edwards
Site Supervisor
475 TALCOTTVILLE ROAD • VERNON, CT • 06066
PHONE: (860) 870-9100 • FAX: (860) 870-5700
CT REG. #5004
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE• 13 1,S
APPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS �� �iUi YT .�fl� ��.t ✓wn�
-° l� OcAq
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS G�) �Q �. LOT
i
SUBDW=ON Cj�/� h-�CDa k- Cj
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER k-03- a (�
AMOUNT OF BOND
CHECK NUMBER '�0 C� 3 3 y LA
DEPARTMENT ��(A h n, t�n
SUBMITTED BY
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FIN CE -" o"�, l y[ C)Sf
DAPE
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER
H.\Pb=ing Depwinient\Holmcs\forms\BONDTRANSNUTTALO8-27-Ol.doc
LAW OFFICES i 4
CUMMINGS, LANZA AND PURNHAGEN,L.L.C. J A� I 1 200C1
1610 ELLINGTON ROAD
POST OFFICE BOX 667 SOUTH '' L P T.
SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074-0667
HAROLD R.CUMMINGS (860)644-3473
MICHAEL J.LANZA FAX(860)644-3347 OF COUNSEL
VINCENT J.PURNHAGEN EDWARD R.KUEHN
EMILY OLSON
January 9, 2006
Ms. Marcia Banach
Planning Director
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Mr. Jeff Folger
Town Engineer
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
RE: Shady Brook Village Condominiums----Bailey Circle
Dear Marcia and Jeff:
I am writing in my capacity as attorney for the South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc.
Bruce Edwards recently delivered to me a copy of the Improvement Location Survey prepared
for Shady Brook Village Condominiums by Gardner &Peterson Associates, LLC dated October
14, 2005.
Apparently, a question has arisen with regards to the paved driveway located on the
southwesterly corner of the property adjoining property, now or formerly, of Edward T.
Sunderland III. Apparently, this driveway provides access from Strong Road to the Sunderland
property.
I have enclosed for your immediate reference, with this letter, a copy of the title block from that
map and the section of the map showing the paved drive referenced in this letter. As indicated,
the driveway accessing the Sunderland property is located on land which is subject to a
conservation easement in favor of the South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc.
Page 2
January 9, 2006
The conservation easement in favor of the South Windsor Land Conservation Trust was created
on January 12, 1999, by deed when the Land Trust conveyed the parcel of land in question to
Bancroft Brook, LLC, predecessor in title to Shady Brook Village.
Apparently, the Sunderland driveway was already in existence at that time.
South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Inc. originally acquired the parcel in question by deed
from Bancroft Brook, LLC dated January 14, 1998, and recorded in Volume 1032, Page 104 of
the South Windsor Land Records.
Apparently;the driveway in question was constructed years before by Edward T. Sunderla_nd.III
or his predecessors in title, for purposes of accessing;what is now shown on the map as the
Sunderland property.
Since the driveway and fence in question apparently predate the.conveyance of the conservation
easement, therefore, the existence of the driveway and fence do not violate any conservation
restrictions as reserved in the January,1999 deed.
Please advise if you have any questions with regards to the above.
Sincer urs,
Har R. Cummings
HRC:es
Enclosure
cc: South Windsor Land Conservation Trust, Board of Directors
Bruce Edwards
s
Abv,-�zP
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
RECEIVED
March 9,2006 MAR 14 2006
The ABC Group,LLC SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT,
165 River Rd.,Suite 3
Willington,CT 06279
Al-IN:Bob Burrows
Dear Mt Burrows,
We are somewhat confused with regard to your recent letter stating that the Board
of Directors of Shadybrook Village Condominium Association would prefer to wait until
the"planned spring walk thru", to sign off on our letter of completed punch list items (for
the grounds and common elements of the community). This was the punch list that was
compiled with their assistance during the November 16,2005 walk-thru with them,yourself
and Bruce Edwards. So we are at a loss as to why they now refuse to sign off on it We
would also like to note that at that time there was no mention of, or agreement tq another
walk-thru with us at a later date. It was understood by all parties involved that this was to be
the final walk thru of the site. This fact is supported by your memorandum to us on
November 3, 2005 which stated that you were "looking to schedule the final walk
around"at that time (See attached copy). Prior to this date the Board had been performing
periodic inspections of the development since at least July 25th and faxing us progressive
punch lists of items, including landscaping, that they thought needed to be taken care of.
We received at least two of such lists (See attached copy of the last one received from you
Prior to the November 16th walk thru, with items that had been completed since last
submitted list blocked out,showing that we had been working on these items well before the
November site inspection).
After the November walls-thru,among other things,we replaced some trees that had
died and agreed to replace 13 dead Redtwig Dogwoods in the spring, even though the
Dogwoods had appeared to die because they did not receive the required maintenance after
we relinquished control of the Association. When we turned over control of the
community to the Association and its management company m June 2005, the
responsibility for maintenance of the completed common elements, including landscaping,
went with it After the dead trees were replaced, all plantings (with the exception of the 13
dogwoods still to be replaced) were in a healthy state and needed proper maintenance to
continue to survive. As a Property Manager you no doubt have been advising your clients
about the following proper maintenance for new shrubs and grasses. Of course, water is
extremely important, especially during the hot, dry months like the ones that we had last
summer. However in addition to water, a special fertilization program specifically designed
for new plants and lawns needs to be implemented. This treatment is essential to help new
plantings wake up in the spring. We would hope that this treatment was done.
While we commend the Board for their due diligence in planning a walk-thru this
spring(as the grounds should be inspected at least twice each year,spring&fall),we will not
be accompanying them at that time. We hope that our adhering to the agreed upon final
walk-thru on November 16,2005 and not agreeing to be a party to this additional wall-thru
is in no way misconstrued and interpreted to mean that we do not have the best interests of
the association in mind. We would ask that the Board of Directors please keep in mind how
S
_2_ March 9,2006
much we assisted their association in its infancy. From the time the association was formed
in September 2004 until it was turned over to the residents in June 2005,we cared for all of
the management duties. As a Property Manager you no doubt are aware of the work that
that entails. Also, I'm sure the residents that were living there last winter remember all the
snow that we had. During the winter of 2004-2005,after each snowfall we not only plowed
the roads,but we cleared the driveways and sidewalks of each occupied unit,the number of
which increased as the winter went along and more residents moved in. Although we did
not ask for any compensation at the time for these services that we provided in the nine
months from September 2004—June 2005,we did keep track of our expenses.
We hope that the Board will take all of the above information into consideration in
their assumption that another walk-thru with us is required.
Sincerely,
B, Edwar xsr'Lc�
Member
Cc:Michelle Lipe
Cc:Sandra Dubiel
P.O. BOX 745. • VERNON, CT • 06066 • PHONE:(860)870-9100
NOV-4-2005 02:29P FROM: TO:8705700 P.2
RECEIVED
IWAR 1 4 2006
MEMORANDUM
SOUTH��lNDSOR PLANNING DEFT.
TO SHADY BROOK LLC/
FROM BOB BURROWS
DATE
RE SHA.DYBROOK VILLAGE WALK AROUND
Debbie-
for Monday, November 21,
2005 at 4: .m.
Enclosed please find a list of items that the Board of Directors have found
unfinished to this point.
Please let me know if this time works for you and the other attending members
of Shady Brook, LLC.
Thank you.
Bob Burrows
02:29P FROM: T0:8705700 P.3
Shady Brook Village Condominium Association
• All storm sewers need to be cleaned and reopened.
• Remove excess tar from repaving
• Define property line at entryway—who owns from the end of white fence to lot#
20.If association owns,need to be cleaned and graded up to the sidewalk.
• Grade ards under construction and eliminate drainage problems.
• Close up utility pipes,exposed wires etc. Cable box still open lot#18/19
• Repair all curbs damaged by construction vehicles—not all have been done
1011111E
k --seed did not germinate in all areas
• Retention ponds,overgrowth Who maintains on a regular basis?Town or
Association?
•
• Remove black sheeting behind all houses-behind#1 and#19
• Lot#12 water cap too close to driveway,damage when plow.
• Lot#9 driveway utility caps in middle of driveway.
• Dead tree behind lot#1
• Broken sidewalk by driveway Lot#18.
• parking area plantings,dead and or overgrown.
• No wildflowers,did we a for this?If so,rebate?Replant?
• Remove Shady Brook sian from ent ay and emergency contact sign
• Grad,n between lot#18 and 19.Water runs down and floods lot# 18.
• Replace dead pine behind#15
• Replace trees removed from front yard lot#5
. Open drain backyard lot#4 standing water/mosquitoes
2 dead pine trees between lot#4 and 48
• 9 dead pines at front entry
• Exposed reinforcement rod foundation rear of 99
Memorandum
DATE: March 14,2006
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
RE: BONDS
Site Bonds
APPLICATION AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE
03-12P, Shadybrook SRD $127,734 $ 80,734 $ 47,000*
*maintenance bond to expire on 3/14/07
IWA/CC Bonds
APPLICATION AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE
03-12P, Shadybrook SRD $ 10,000 -0- $ 10,000
02-22P,Berry Patch I $ 25,000 $ 25,000 -0-
Mar 20 06 01: 30p 8GO8961294 p. 1
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
March 20,2006
To Whom It May Concern:
Please note that we have moved out of our ce at 475 Talcottville Road.
Our new mailing address i . P.O. Box 745,Vernon, CT 06066. 's new address applies
to all of our companies in ding:
Quail Hollow Associates,LLC
Quail Hollow Two Associates,LLC
Quail Hollow Three Associates,LLC
Shady Brook Associates,LLC
QH242,LLC
QH395, LLC
Q113115,LLC
SBO1,LLC
SB06, LLC
SB11,LLC
We can still be reached by telephone at(860) 870-9100 and by fax at(860) 896-1294.
Sincerely,
H-W-h
Leah Allard
Office Manager
P.O. BOX 745 • VERNON, CT • 06066
PHONE: (860) 870-9100 • FAX: (860) 870-5700
MEMORANDUM
To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer
Date: 3/14/06
RE: App 03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Bond
We have received a request to reduce the bond to Maintenance for the infrastructure
improvements for the Shady Brook SRD on Strong Road. This work is substantially complete
and I recommend the bond for this project be reduced to the maintenance level of $47,000.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
q O%NN Sf4
�' x /o� O-P siouLi'L V&U&ot
m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
f�dSOB•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 20, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Erosion and Sediment Control Bond
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 14, 2006 to deny your
request for the reduction of the IWA/CC bond for the above referenced project.
Reason for denial: Areas on the site have yet to be stabilized.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Patrick kYenrndy, Ch an
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering
IWA/CC
tOW N Sf4
710v� 0-p
s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
r�osox,co AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 20, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: App103-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 14,2006 to reduce the
maintenance bond from$ 127,734 to $47,000.
A check will be sent to you from the Town of South Windsor. Please contact Michele Lipe,Assistant
Director of Planning at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
Patrick Kennedy
Planning and Zoning Commission
PK/bmm
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
V \ \ 'I 73. *'
I \ \ IRON PIN SET 15.00'
—� "+ L
FROM PROPERTY CORNERN 65'28 30 W 158.56' I " y ? 6a
Qpr-
\•\ / INV,61.
\ ` � FLARED END
\ \\ ` i / `l� `10' S1DC� Y,
LAJ
CONSERVATION 1
EASEMENT �' J
n IN FAVOR OF THE
�1 SOUTH WINDSOR
V) LAND
I CONSERVATION
I I TRUST, INCI
v
\ N F
N 1
HYUNG B.
N 1 \ I KUM R. LE
POOL
� \ F
AREA z
I ` N
\ ) Z \ z
PAVED \
DRIVE I \
EXISTING BARN
ca \
1.6' OFF PROP. LINE---J I W
S 63'1 Ih0- E 199.08'
-X XJ IRON PIN SEA
STRONG ROAD
40 20 0 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40'
,1.
1� x
s
l
1F
w
I
JT) 4
p�k.
N/F "
GLEN A. I
KNAFEL f
I n
a�
j CB 3 `J i
ITF-67.55 `y
FL-61.55 (15" S) �r
FL-81.45 (15" N)
j D=24'42'47"
R=85.00V
L=36.66'
T=18.62
9.04 EDGE OF EASEMENT ;✓
ANKE£ GAS'
r.
N 23'18'06" E 24.63' "
�I N 66620'47" W 1.78'
1 .e 15 MPH
SPEED LIMIT SIGN w•.r .
3
50' R.O.W. IN FAVOR OF ,
LAND N/F GLEN A. KNAFEL
SMH 3
TF-67.81 +. "
FL-54.46
.51 N/F .
KEVIN & LAURIE
ICHARETTE
ce 2
o TF=67.04 1
c FL-62.93 (S)
88 FL-62.83 (N) r
w8
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION SURVEY
N RECORD DRAWING
x
to
SHADY BROOK VILLAGE CONDOMINIUMS M
e8.9
FENCE
BAILEY CICLE
SOUTH WINDSOR CONNEC I T CUT €.
TF-58.41 GARDNER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES, LLC
Q9 FL=64186 178 HARTFORD TURNPIKE
ONUMNEN , SET TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS
TEL. 860 871-0808 FAX. 860 875-2086
6s 25 �'�2 BY SCALE DATE SHEET NO. MAP NO.
53,59 ROAD
. B.D.C. 1"=40' 10-14-2005 1 OF 1 10061—REC
REV.12-7-2005
tOW N St
A <�
C R F
lfi V
70v saP �
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
°SOR-CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511
May 31, 2006
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
c/o Brian Edwards
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: App103-12P, Shady Brook Village
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on May 23, 2006 to release the
IWA/CC bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$10,000.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)
will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.
252. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
PX (��)
Patrick ennedy, Chairman
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering
Design Professionals, Inc.
i
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
APPLICANT NAME (},��
ADDRESS r r t
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER ( ' (L P� C,� � , 1(,-.
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER J 0 o C7 I
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT 6
Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
/0
NAME DATE
3 C/
CHECK # ISSUED DATE
BY
H:\Pl=ing Department\Hotrnes\forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL08-27-0i.doc.
Planning Department
• of South • •
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
Date: 5/26/2006
Re: App. #03-12P, Shadybrook SRD street trees
Karl Reichle and I inspected the street trees in the above referenced development.
As a result, we are requesting the following trees be replaced:
All 3 oak trees in the parking island
Trees in front of the following units: #79, #51, #35, #25, #20, #15, and #5
In addition, we are requesting the following trees be trimmed:
Trees in front of#44, #35, #12, and #6
If you have any questions or want to meet Karl on site, please contact me at 644-
2511, ext. 252.
•Page 1
GARDNER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES, LLC
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
178 HARTFORD TURNPIKE
BARRY D.CLARKE,L.S. TELEPHONE (860) 871-0808
SUSAN E.JAMAITUS,L.S. TOLLAND,CONNECTICUT 06084
ERIC R.PETERSON,P.E. FAX (860) 875-2086
KENNETH R.PETERSON,L.S. EMAIL infoOGardnerPeterson.com
MARK A.PETERSON,P.E.
HENRY R TORCELLINI,P.E. ! '+ �a:I�rykL)
EVERETT O.GARDNER,P.E.,L.S.Emeritus MAY 3 12006
SDV' Fi%!i''iDS�r A[.=PJijJii`IGDEPT,
May 26, 2006
Ms. Michelle Lipe
Planning Department
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: 44 & 50 Bailey Circle
Shady Brook
Dear Michelle:
On November 3, 2005, we received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals
to construct a deck at 44 Bailey Circle. A stipulation of approval required the installation
of five arborvitae type plantings between the decks for screening.
All improvements have been completed at this time. In December, we submitted
a check for$1,000 for a bond for the improvements. I ask that you release these funds to
us at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions,please contact me.
Yours truly,
erson
KRP.jml
10061 b ondre)ease.doc
"3 zf
The ABC Group LLC
16S RIVER ROAD
SUITE 3
WILLINGTON, CT 06279ECEIV
ED
JUN 2 9 2006
June 27, 2006 SOUTH ffiNDSOP PLANNING DEPT.
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
Attention: Brian Edwards
PO Box 745
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards;
Thank you for youF letter of June 19, 2006. .
I understand your concern and at this point can only assure you that no ill will
was intended by my assistant Meri Grenier. Meri has always enjoyed a fine
working relationship with everyone in your group and meant no defamatory
allegations by the letter. I apologize for the communication and would be happy
to issue a retraction to the Town of South Windsor at your request.
I value the fact that your group thought enough of our management team to
recommend us to Shady Brook Village and Quail Hollow III, and also the working
relationship that our mutual business associates have enjoyed.
Again, please accept my apologies for the offending communication.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Burrows, Jr.
Property Manager
Shady Brook Village Condominium Association
Cc: Michelle Lipe; Town of South Windsor
Telephone: 860-872-8706 Facsimile: 860-429-5725 2�
'I tJ
Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date 4 J� page
� s
To ��(�a✓_/� From j�� e� t C
Co./Dept. (I Co. 1 �l , ' • Department
Phone# Phone# d (s)1 V, • • South
Ili"" • •
-ax# Fax#
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
Date: 6/15/2006
Re: App. #03-12P, Shadybrook SRD landscaping inspection
As a result of the landscaping inspection this spring, we are requesting the following
trees/shrubs be replaced:
Approximately11 dead arborvitaes at the entrance must be replaced;
Behind lot 19/20—two pines are missing;
Approximately 12 dead Japanese andromeda must be replaced behind unit 7;
One fraser fir must be replaced n the edge of the detention area behind unit
14;
Approximately 2 variegated dogwoods must be replaced in the detention
areas (one in each area)
Northern bayberry in the detention area plantings behind units 9-11 and in the
detention area behind units 14/15 were not looking that good and it was agreed that
we would look at them again to see if they needed to be replaced prior to release of
the landscape bond.
Please note: the street trees required to be replaced/trimmed were included in a
memo from myself dated 5/26/06. 1 have also forwarded to you the memo we
received from the ABC Group, LLC dated 5/30/06 which included three items to be
addressed.
Once all you have completed the remaining items, contact me and we can revisit the
site for the release of the landscape bond.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 644-2511, ext. 252.
0 Page 1
Planning
Department
Town of • • •
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
Date: 5/26/2006
Re: App. #03-12P, Shadybrook SRD street trees
Karl Reichle and I inspected the street trees in the above referenced development.
As a result, we are requesting the following trees be replaced:
All 3 oak trees in the parking island
Trees in front of the following units: #79, #51, #35,#25, #20, 15 and#5��
In addition, we are requesting the following trees be trimmed:
Trees in front of#44,#35'#12, and#6
If you have any questions or want to meet Karl on site, please contact me at 644-
2511, ext. 252.
C (3)
0 Page 1
MAY-30-2006 03:44P FROM: TO:18606447280 P.2
The ABC Group
Memo
To: Michelle Lipe; Town of South Windsor
From: Meri Grenier
Date: May 30, 2006
Re: Shady Brook Village
Michelle,
I recently met with the Shady Brook Board of Directors where we discussed your
walk around of the Association. After reviewing your list the Board had a couple
additional concerns as well as some questions. Please see below:
• Due to a structural mistake by the developer the deck had to be altered
behind unit 44. During the construction the grass area was damaged, will that
be the responsibility of the developer?
• Also where the developer removed two trees behind 50&48 will they be re-
seeding the bare areas?
• There is a pine located next to units 20&44 that is leaning, is that on your list
for the arborist to look at?
In addition to these concerns, the Board asked me to clarify if the site bond of
$50,000 is released but not the $10,000 landscape bond, can the developer walk
away from the landscape repairs? And if he does will that bond amount be paid
directly to the Association?
Thank you for all of your assistance.
Meri Grenier
Property Assistant
1
Planning
Department
Town of • • •
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning '
Date: 5/26/2006
r
Re: App. #03-12P, Shadybrook SRD street trees
Karl Reichle and I inspected the street trees in the above referenced development.
As a result, we are requesting the following trees be replaced:
All 3 oak trees in the parking island
Trees in front of the following units: #79, #51, #35, #25, #20, #15, and #5
In addition, we are requesting the following trees be trimmed:
Trees in front of#44, #35, #12, and #6
If you have any questions or want to meet Karl on site, please contact me at 644-
2511, ext. 252.
0 Page 1
05/26/2006 FRI 12:06 FAX 860 644 7280 South Windsor Town Hall 14001
*********************
*** FAX TX REPORT ***
*********************
TRANSMISSION OK
JOB NO. 1448
DESTINATION ADDRESS 94544473
PSWD/SUBADDRESS
DESTINATION ID
ST. TIME 05/26 12:06
USAGE T 00, 19
PGS. 1
RESULT OK
Planning Department
Town of • • •
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R.Lipe,AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
Date: 5/26/2006
Re: App.#03-12P, Shadybrook SRD street trees
Karl Reichle and I inspected the street trees in the above referenced development.
As a result,we are requesting the following trees be replaced:
All 3 oak trees in the parking island
Trees in front of the following units:#79,#51,##35,#25,#20,#15,and#5
In addition,we are requesting the following trees be trimmed:
Trees in front of#44,#35,#12,and#6
If you have any questions or want to meet Karl on site, please contact me at 644
2511, ext.252.
The ABC Group LLC
165 RIVER ROAD
SUITE 3
WILLINGTON, CT 06279
RECEIVED
January 28, 2007 FFR -5 2007,
Debra Edwards 800 UNDSORPLONGOEn,
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
PO Box 745
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Ms. Edwards;
The Shady Brook Village Board of Directors met and discussed your letter of
January 9, 2007.
The Board of Directors maintains their position that the Town of South Windsor's
required landscaping replacements were the items to be addressed. It is the
opinion of the Board of Directors that the enclosed invoice is not the
Association's responsibility as it was indicated to us that the work to be done was
a requirement of the Town of South Windsor. Please see attached letter to you
on October 19th, 2006 indicating that the Association agrees with the Town of
South Windsor's requirements and the Association made no further requests at
that time.
Thank you and please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Meri Grenier
Property Manager
Shady Brook Village Condominium Association
Cc: Town of South Windsor—Michelle Lipe
Telephone: 860-872-8706 Facsimile: 860-429-5725
The ABC Group LLC
165 RIVER ROAD
SUITE 3
WILLINGTON
October 19, 2006
Debra Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
PO Box 745
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Ms. Edwards;
The Shady Brook Village Board of Directors met last evening and discussed your
letter of September 14, 2006.
The Board of Directors maintains their position that the Town of South Windsor's
required landscaping replacements should be done.
In regards to the trees to be planted behind units 6 and 12, if the Town is willing
to give you a variance to not have them put in, that is fine with the Shady Brook
Village Board of Directors.
Thank you and please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Meri Grenier
Property Manager
Shady Brook Village Condominium Association
Cc: Town of South Windsor—Michelle Lipe
Telephone: 860-872-8706 Facsimile: 860-429-5725
01
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
January 9, 2007
Shadybrook Village Condominium Association, Inc.
c/o The ABC Group,LLC
Meri Grenier—Property Manager
185 River Rd., Suite 3
Willington,CT 06279
Dear Ms. Grenier:
The Town of South Windsor's required landscaping replacements at Shadybrook Village
have now been done and we have paid the landscape contractor in full for his work.
Enclosed is our bill in the amount of $1574.10 for the Association's portion of that work.
As stated in our letter dated September 14, 2006 (a copy of which is enclosed), "we would
be happy to arrange for the replacement of the two street trees in front of #25 and #35,
and the eleven Arborvitae at the entrance at the same time our other work was done, but we
did not feel that they were our responsibility to pay for, as their required replacement was a
result of poor maintenance and/or poor workmanship on the part of the Association, it's
management company and it's landscape contractor." At that time we were requesting that
the Association willingly and reasonably assume financial responsibility for the replacement
of these items, as they were damaged while under their oversight. Unfortunately that was
not the case.
The Association has the option of seeking reimbursement for this expense from those
responsible for the damage, since it is the one who hired them. However, we do expect to
be paid for these items and reserve the right to add late charges and 1.5% interest monthly
on any unpaid balance after 30 days.
Sincerely,
Debra L. Edwards
Member
Cc: Sandra Dubiel—Association President
P.O. BOX 745 VERNON, CT 06066
PHONE: (860) 870-9100
4 Invoice
Shady Brook Associates, LLC. Invoice
P.O. Box 745
Landscape Repl.
Vernon, CT 06066
voice: (860) 870-9100 Invoice
Fax: (860) 896-1294 Jan 9, 2007
Page:
1
Sold To: Ship to:
Shadybrook Village Condo Assoc. , Inc.
c/o The ABC Group, LLC
185 River Rd. , Suite 3
Willington, CT 06279
I Customer ID _ Customer PO Payment Terms Due Date
SHADYBROOK I Net 30 Days 1/19/07
Quantity Description Unit Price Extension
2.00 Replace 2 Red Oak trees in front of #25 and #35 349.80 699.60
(Bailey Circle
I� 11.00 Replace 11 Arborvitae at entrance to development 79.50 874.50
I
I
i
I Subtotal 1,574.10
Sales Tax
Total Invoice Amount 1,574.10
Check No: Payment Received 0.00
TOTAL 1,574.10
Cl
Ow N Se4
O
` 7J w' / V V/ sl V4'liI V
-1
y R
AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
f�OSOR-0) TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
December 21,2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Landscaping
Letter of Credit#10088
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 12, 2006 to release
the landscaping bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of $10,000 as the work has been
completed.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COrISSION
fV V`
Czuu��
Patrick Kennedy, Chairman
PK/bmm
cc: Town Engineer
"OVIN szq
siou�O
c `
s �
f�OSOR•c°�� TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511
December 14, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon,CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P,Shady Brook Village SRD Landscaping
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 12, 2006 to release
the landscaping bond for the above referenced project.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bonds to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)
will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.
252. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Patrick Kennedy, Chairman
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering r
IWA/CC
C O.NN Sf4
siou� ?d&U&Ot
afi 07
5 �
F540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, Cl- U(dO14
�OSOR IO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
December 14, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Landscaping
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 12, 2006 to release
the landscaping bond for the above referenced project.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bonds to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)
will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.
252. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
Patrick Kennedy, Chairman
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering
IWA/CC
N#,v 28 36 12;46p Brian & Debra Edwards (860) 896-1294 p,1
P.O.Sox 745
Vemon,CT 06066 Shady
Phone:(960)870-9100 Associates,
Fax:(860)8 -1
rax
To: Michele Lipe From: Debbie Edwards
Fax: 644-7280 Pages: 1
Phone: Date: 11128/2006
Re: Shadybrook Landscape Bond CC:
0 Urgent X Fw Review 0 Please Comment El Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
0 Comments:
All items that were on the Town's Landscaping Punchlist for Shadybrook Village
have been completed. We would like to request that our Landscape Bond be
released. Please let us know when your inspection of the development has been
done and our bond money is ready to be picked up. ff you have any questions,
Bruce can be reached at 883-5498.
Thanks.
Ito 3=
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES LLC r �
JUL 14 2006
July 12,2006 SOUTIi VA'INDSD,';;"I,0jN1AG'L)Fpj.
Shadybrook Condominium Association, Inc.
c/o Sandra Dubiel
74 Bailey Circle 4zh f% A p�N E
South Windsor, CT 06074 .v e9 ��A
Dear Board Members:
Recently the Town of South Windsor sent us a list of trees and plantings that need
to be trimmed or replaced before our Landscape Bond can be released. Some of the items
on the list have already been replaced by us once. Since you took over control of the
Association on June 20, 2005, you have been responsible to arrange for the proper care of
the Common Elements, of which these are a part. Please send us a copy of your schedule
for maintenance, i.e. watering, fertilizing, etc., as well as copies of the contracts you have in
place to care for these. On a recent visit to the community it was observed and pointed out
to Mrs. Dubiel that whoever did the edging around the street trees, piled up the excess dirt
and mulch on top of the existing mulch bed, burying the root ball and base of the trunk.
This burying of the root collar is often fatal to newer trees.
We look forward to your quick response so that we can work together to get these
items taken care of.
Sincerely,
Debra L. Edwards
Member
i/ Cc: Michelle Lipe -Town of South Windsor Planning Dept.
Cc: Bob Burrows—ABC Group,LLC (Property Manager)
P.O. BOX 745 • VERNON, CT • 06066
PHONE: (860) 870-9100
SHADY BROOK ASSOCIATES , LLC
June 19,2006
Robert Burrows
The ABC Group,LLG .IUN 2 1 2006
165 River Rd., Suite 3
Willington,CT 06279
Dear Mr.Burrows:
Please find attached a copy of the letter that was sent by your assistant Meri
Grenier, to Michelle Lipe, the Town of South Windsor Assistant Director of Planning, on
behalf of Shadybrook Village Condo Assoc., Inc., a property that your company is
currently managing. We value our reputation and therefore are very concerned in that Ms.
Grenier's letter contained some defamatory allegations and inaccurate statements about
our company. Before issuing a letter such as that, it is usually best to get all the facts so
as not to incur any liability for inaccuracies. It also would have been nice if we were
contacted beforehand to address any concerns that the Board of Directors had, instead of
just hastily sending a letter off to the Town. If that were done the ensuing inaccuracies
would have been avoided.
Ms. Grenier's first comment states that there was "a structural mistake by the
developer." This statement is inaccurate, defamatory and calls our reputation into
question. Unless you or Ms. Grenier can provide proof from a structural engineer that
there was a structural mistake, and what that was,please submit a letter to Michelle Lipe,
stating that your representative spoke in error and without having all the facts. We would
like to receive a copy of that correspondence. If Ms. Grenier had checked her facts first,
she would have found out that it was actually Gardner & Peterson Associates, the
professional engineering firm hired by us, who made a mistake in the stakeout of the unit
next to#44. This was not a structural problem,but a zoning issue. This resulted in a side
yard that did not meet zoning requirements when taking into account the expanded deck
size of #44. Additionally, the Town of South Windsor required Gardner & Peterson
Associates to post a$2500 bond last fall to cover any landscaping issues that might arise
when the deck of#44 was modified this spring. If Ms. Grenier had gotten the facts first,
she would have found out that they are the ones responsible for any landscape issues
resulting from the reconstruction of the deck.
In addition to the previous misstatement, in her letter Ms. Grenier asked- "can the
developer walk away from the landscape repairs?" This too is defamatory and potentially
damaging to our reputation with the Town of South Windsor,to transmit the thought that
we would walk away from legitimate items. Her letter to the Town was written just two
weeks after we replaced thirteen Red Twig Dogwoods, which had died due to a lack of
maintenance, specifically water. We are at a loss, if we would do this, where does the
idea that we would walk away come from?
�pylH Sf4
O J
� . U
f • 6014
TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
May 31, 2006
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
c/o Brian Edwards
475 Talcottville Road
Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: App103-12P, Shady Brook Village
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on May 23, 2006 to release the
IWA/CC bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$10,000.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)
will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.
252. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Patrick ennedy, Chairman
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering
Design Professionals, Inc.
i
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
' DATE:_ 6(0
APPLICANT NAME ljGln/A }� nAysoc
ADDRESS ] , 41,r d r
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER"C - 12L��
50
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT J ; 0c)0
Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
NAME DATE
BY
CHECK # ISSUED DATE
c xh
1
H:\P)anning Department\HoLnes\fonns\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL08-27-Ol.doc.
Planning Department
Town of South Windsor
Memo
To: Bruce Edwards
From: Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
Date: 5/26/2006
Re: App. #03-12P, Shadybrook SRD street trees
Karl Reichle and I inspected the street trees in the above referenced development.
As a result, we are requesting the following trees be replaced:
All 3 oak trees in the parking island
Trees in front of the following units: #79, #51, #35, #25, #20, #15, and #5
In addition, we are requesting the following trees be trimmed:
Trees in front of#44, #35, #12, and #6
If you have any questions or want to meet Karl on site, please contact me at 644-
2511, ext. 252.
„ t c
• Page 1
GARDNER & PETERSON ASSOCIATES, LLC
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
178 HARTFORD TURNPIKE
SUSANE.JAMAITUS,L.S. TOLLAND,CONNECTICUT 06084
ERIC R.PETERSON,P.E. FAX (860) 875-2086
KENNETH R.PETERSON,L.S. EMAIL info@GardnerPeterson.com
MARK A.PETERSON,P.E. c
HENRY P.TORCELLINI,P.E. ¢ r �Id
JED
EVERETT 0.GARDNER,P.E.,L.S.Emeritus MA 1 3 2006
SGV' IVHVUPL NN,v,IG DFpT.
May 26, 2006
Ms. Michelle Lipe
Planning Department
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: 44 & 50 Bailey Circle
Shady Brook
Dear Michelle:
On November 3, 2005, we received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals
to construct a deck at 44 Bailey Circle. A stipulation of approval required the installation
of five arborvitae type plantings between the decks for screening.
All improvements have been completed at this time. In December, we submitted
a check for$1,000 for a bond for the improvements. I ask that you release these funds to
us at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Yours truly,
erson
KRP:jml '
10061 bondrelease.doc - ='. -• Y. ...
- `n
t0W N Sf4
0so� V&7d&�t
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 20, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: App103-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 1.4, 2006 to reduce the
maintenance bond from$ 127,734 to $ 47,000.
A check will be sent to you from the Town of South Windsor. Please contact Michele Lipe,Assistant
Director of Planning at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
Patrick
6 Kennedy
Planning and Zoning Commission
PK/bmm
cc: Town Engineer
'Chief Building Official
s 4 M .
t f r#
r.
SpW N Sf4
A <�
T... sou& V&U&Olt
T540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
�I��SOR•co�`�w AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 20, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Erosion and Sediment Control Bond
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 14, 2006 to deny your
request for the reduction of the IWA/CC bond for the above referenced project.
Reason for denial: Areas on the site have yet to be stabilized.
Very tray yours,
PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
f
Patrick Kenndy, Ch an
PK/bmm
cc: Engineering
--1 A/CC
{
t F
BOND RELEASESMTTTAL
T
DATE: 3 I i 0�]
APPLICANT NAME S
ADDRESS O Do �(
o r—
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS
LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER*
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 5o w
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT /
Please release the bond indicated above
work has been comPleted, as all of
the required
NAME 3 I 1
DATE
393 3 �a/o�
CHECK # ISSUED BY
DATE
H:1pLvming Department Holmes\forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSI OTTAL 08-27-01.doc
t �
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: )&
APPLICANT NAME -jLn, L, bto o < /4SS y G . i (—C,
ADDRESS f-�-rl ro I clo+{ V A-r_ ` o a j
vnbn C i
PROJECT LOCATIONDDRESS_ 4
/A . -k j �,c C J Y LLP LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER 1 o K S R 0
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBERS
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT
Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
OL
NAME DATE
CHECK # ISSUED DATE
H:\Plwming Department\HoLmes\forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 08-27-0f.doc
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 1(p �U
APPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS ��j' �Ul( Cp}{VI
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS ( ' C iY LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER �3-
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER Q d(� �
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT *11 O,OC)o �e F y 16 Ov .
✓ed�Gfi
Please .release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
31 lot
NAME DATE
Y
CHECK # ISSUED DATE
H
. .•FPJti'.
H.\Planning DePw'ment\H01mes\f0m's\B0ND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 08-27-0f.doc
CAN f7ct k
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE• I 13 J oS,
APPLICANT NAME rtQ ,� C Y� t As
S�
ADDRESS
ncAq
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT
5�it i
SUSDrlrISION
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBERS — {�
AMOUNT OF BOND
CHECK NUMBER ' 0 3 3 (o
DEPARTMENT �� h t�0 e
SUBMITTED BY
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FIN CE
i
DA E
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER \5 OZV 9 2
HAPlanning Department\Hohnes\forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL 08-27-01 doe
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
APPLICANT NAME S A s soc � (_C
ADDRESS Li-7 5 TGl 1 c �/I Da
��/v►.v v-1 � C'� U to �
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS L.4 �Cl-'l C CCL - LOT
SUBDIVISION � , o�L S
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER
AMOUNT OF BOND 4 )10 000,
CHECK NUMBER
DEPARTMENT �(x n Vl In
SUBMITTED BY C ,c j 3 joy
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FINANCE to l I ( o`y
NAME DATE
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 69oo '
H:\Pl=ing Department\Holmes\forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL 08-27-Ol.doc
BOND TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 9 f 2- -6
CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER
NAME & ADDRESS `1 5 �(/� C-0 V!
6 C� 0 zo Q G
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS 0 Lid4 LOT
SUBDIVISION a
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBERb 3 �
.AMOUNT OF BOND_j
CHECK NUMBER �j D 3 �c �
DEPARTMENT
SUBMITTED BY
NAME DATE
RECEIVED BY FINANCE
NAME DA E
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER p 4,
S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: ,, JU
APPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS 41 GJ
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS ' C ,Y LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBE k
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER S
o o
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT *1 I Q OC)o 00 .
Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
NAME
DATE
CHECK # ISSUED DATE
H.\Plamting Department\H01mes\f0ttns\B0ND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 08-27-0t.doc
BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: ,, lot
APPLICANT NAME beoo K ASSa c. 1 I (—C--
ADDRESS s- 1 r 'F0t,l Cep-R VI I I t Y`.0 0 d
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS- , � C JYdf LOT
P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER '�h3..1 k
SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT
Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required
work has been completed.
3 I � nL
NAME DATE
CHECK # ISSUED- --- DATE
HAPlanning Department\Holmes\forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 08-27-Ol.doc
SOWN Sf4
o
x r 7-own O-P slol� ?d&U&Olt
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
Solt-co�� AREA CODE 860/644-251 1
March 20, 2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl#03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD Erosion and Sediment Control Bond
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 14, 2006 to deny your
request for the reduction of the IWA/CC bond for the above referenced project.
Reason for denial: Areas on the site have yet to be stabilized.
_
- - -- -- -
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Patrick Kenndy, Ch an
PK/bmm
cc: .Engineering
3WA/CC
SOWN St4
Tlow� o-p Sou�
y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
> w
SOR•co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511
March 20,2006
Bruce Edwards
Shady Brook Associates, LLC
475 Talcottville Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re: Appl 03-12P, Shady Brook Village SRD
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 14,2006 to reduce the
maintenance bond from$ 127,734 to $ 47,000.
A check will be sent to you from the Town of South Windsor. Please contact Michele Lipe,Assistant
Director of Planning at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
01
Patrick Kennedy
Planning and Zoning Commission
PK/bmm
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official