Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Subdivision (123)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION A o K" S f y APPLICATION FORM - Application No: ©AWK Official Receipt Date: APR 2 6 2002 Receipt No: ---- OR cv`�� APPLICANT: Jacques Construction,LLC,c/o John. Jacques SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEpT' ADDRESS: 67 Ridge road, South Windsor,CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Estate of John Pudim, Jr. ADDRESS: c/o Edward Pudim,Administrator,277 Main Street, Somers,CT 06071 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: west side of Barber Hill Road ASSESSOR'S MAP # 139 PARCEL# 1 ZONE RR NAME, ADDRESS, TEL&FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie, Design Professionals,Inc. , 165 S. Satellite Rd.,South Windsor,CT 06074, Tel. 291-8755, Fax 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) © Subdivision ❑ Minor ® Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑ Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. A.— raturAp t Signature of Property Owner (See reverse side for additional information) Lh b+ A CNenerat Guidance on Development of FOM ��c+,jh,rat Pr�ner-t�rg - (March, 1999) The Departments of Public Health and-Environmental Protection have become aware of a number of site development projects on former agricultural land in which persistent pesticides (primarily dieldrin, DDT and breakdown products., chlordane, arsenic) remain in soil at concentrations that approach or exceed the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations. While such development projects do not specifically fall under the RSR.s, concerns have been raised that the residual pesticides constitute a health risk. In light of this, DPH and DEP offer general guidance for such sites as described below. This guidance is meant to provide an approach that is protective of public health and that also leaves a degree of flexibility. We expect municipal officials and site developers to consider our input togethtr with other factors in deciding how best to handle site re- development projects. Evaluate site history and sample surface soil (ideally 0-Y depth) in areas where pesticides were applied and stored. A limited number of deeper samples are also recommended, particularly in areas where there is evidence of substantial surfici.al contamination. Total mass concentrations and leaching tests should be performed, with consideration given to analyses for newer pesticides if the site is currently- agricultural. a Evaluate detected pesticide concentrations against RSR values. If the concentrations are below the RSR values in all-cases, there is no need for further consideration of pesticide contaminant issues at the site. If some concentrations are above the RsRs, the following options for managing the affected soil should be considered: 1) Keep affected soil separate from other soils and use it on-site as fill under buildings,parking lots, or across roads-or dispose of the soil in an approved landfill off-site. 2) Mix it with unaffected soils to decrease the effective soil concentration. In this case, representative samples should be taken from the mixed soil piles following RGRA protocols regarding the number and location of samples from soil pile's_ If the mixed concentrations are below the RSRs, the soil pile can then be used anywhere on-site. If the mixed concentrations are still above RSR values, then the soil pile could be used as fill material below grade (but not topsoil)-in parts of the site where digging will not occur_Cz.e., areas where children will not play; _- non-residential areas; uses as described under Option 1). . y 4 - ry Y 3) Depending upon the degree of RSR exceedanee, consideration should be> given, in consultation with DPH and DEP, to removal of specific hot spot areas. 4) If affected soils are in some manner kept on-site, an additional precautionary - step would be post-construction surface soil sampling to ensure that the pra,.-tices described above have successfully reduced the potential for direct exposure. 5) If any soils containing pesticides above RSR values remain on-site, the location of these affected soils should be recorded on a site map which is on file at the local health department- Site-specific data can be provided to DPH(549-7742) and DEP (424-3776) to make sure that a-particular site does not present unique risks and that the data are suitable for comparing against RSR values. y - o OO L4F w F:v9 Centenn:a!� nve Peaoody,MA 01960-79B5 r�7 ; Y ' wwwweslonancsampscn.corn Weston.`�X Ji s�rr .�Q G Tel:(978)S32-1900 Fax (978)977-0100 7-7 Innovative So(atioru srnL e i3 .__;=F January 29, 2002 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction,-LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06D74 Re: Impacted Soil Management Plan Pudim Farm Residential Development,Barber Hill Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Jacques: Weston&Sampson Engineers Inc. conducted an environmental pesticides soil investigation at the 38-acre Pudim Farm property located on Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, Connecticut, ::n December 2001. The farm property is being considered for a residential developmen:consisting of single-family residential homes. Findings and conclusio.as presented in the report identified the presence of chlordane in shallow soils in the former agricultural field area above the CTDEP Remediation Standard Regulations Pollutant Mobility criterion- Based on the findings and conclusions presented in the soil investigation report, Weston &Sampson has prepared the following conceptual soil management plan to address the impacted soils that exceed CTDEP standards. The soil management plan addresses the impacted soils in the context of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) Guidance Document on Development of Agricultural properties (March 1999). Briefly,the CTDEP guidance document outlines several management options to reduce exposure risks associated with pesticide related soil impacts- Some of the suggested management options include soil mixing and re-analysis, isolation of impacted soils beneath structures, roac.ways,or placement of affected soils at sufficient depths below grade to render theirs as isolated from potential exposure. Basedon review of the CTDEP guidance document,Weston& Sampson recommends "strip-mining"the top :oil from the affected areas of the former agricultural field area and mixing the soil with either deeper soils, or soils from unaffected areas of the property to reduce the effective concentration of chlordane in the site soils. Upon completion of soil stock-piling and mixing, Weston&Sampson recommends collected six (6)to eight (8)soil samples from the soil piles for laboratory analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the impacted soil management approach relative to CTDEP soil standards. A1a=cbuQas(M Mas bureru Cannetticur 1"e Island NwHampswM Afatne Five Centennial Drive 100 Foxbosough Blvd,Suite 250 2928 Main Street 2348 Post Road,Suite 8 195 Hanover Street,suite 28 PO Box 189 '.x441. Peabody.MA 01 960-7 985 Foxb 3rough,MA 02035 Glastonbury,CT 06033-1093 Warwick,RI 02886-2 271 Portsmouth,NH 03801 Ywk.ME 03909 Mr.John Jacques January 29,2002 Page 2 of 2 I : If the laboratory data demonstrate tha;'t the reported concentrations for selected analytical parameters are below applicable CTLJEP standards,then the soils would be suitable for unrestricted use at the c.evelopment. ki the event that soil data exceed CTDEP standards the affected soils would be better suited to placement beneath building structures or roadways in accordance,with CTDEVi-policy. j Weston & Sampson appreciates the opportunity to be of services to Jacques Construction LLC. Please call Mitcliell R. Chester at (860) 659-8668 to discuss this project. Very truly yours, WESTON & SAMPSON ENGINEE*S, INC. Mitchell R. Chester,LI;P Project Manager I I i- i i i` i . i is i i i is is i is X.1,!�i Rprr EMS PBT Initiative: Priority PBTs- Chlordane Page i of 2 Exh� b� �- ' i rr-e of Pollution Prevention and T 1( Environmental Pf7ot ectio�United States �'erSi$1�@i11�#3lOacCUl3IUl;�#iY� 9tfd� A Toxic (P13T) Chemical P r�ram Priority PBTs: AboutPSTs . , Chlordane Action Plans What is Chlordane? Priority P8T Profiles Chlordane was used in the United States from 1948 to 1978 as a pesticide on agricultural crops, lawns,and gardens and as a fumigating agent. In 1978, EPA Tool Box canceled the use of chlordane on food crops and phased out other above-ground use for the next 5 years. From 1983 to 1988, chlordane's only approved use was to contri termites in homes. The pesticide was applied underground around the foundation of PBTs and You homes. In 1988, all approved uses of chlordane in the United States were terminated however, manufacture for export still continues. Chlordane is a persistent, bioacculumative, and toxic(PBT) pollutant targeted by EPA. Resources Whafs Now Why Are We Concerned About Chlordane? Everyone in the United States has been exposed to low levels of chlordane due to its wide spread use. Because chlordane is bioaccumulative, it builds up in our food chair and becomes more concentrated as it moves.up our food chain to humans and other wildlife. Fish consumption advisories for some species are in effect for chlordane in t Great Lakes ecosystem. Chlordane remains in our food supply because it was commonly used on crops in the 19Ws and 1979s. What harmful effects can Chlordane have on us? • Likely causes cancer and may cause liver cancer • Can cause behavioral disorders in children if they were exposed before birth o Mile nursing • Harms th�docrine system, nervous system, digestive system, and liver J�"^� �� ���� '�� t Se How are we exposed to Chlordane? • Infants may be exposed through breast milk • By eating contaminated fish and shellfish • Unborn children exposed through the mother's blood stream • Highest exposure from living in homes that were treated with chlordane for termites Where can Chlordane be found? file://A:\EPMs PBT Initiative Priority PBTs- Chlordane.htm 6/4/2002 EPA's PBT Initiative: Priority PBTs- Chlordane Page 2 of 2 Current uses. • Fire ant control in power transformers Potential Sources to our Environment: • Found in particles in the water column • Other treated soils • Soil surrounding wooden structures controlled for termites • Water sediments • Transport by atmosphere from other regions; deposited in rain, snow,dust 40 Retum to Priority PBTs Page Return to the Top of the Page About PBTs( Strategy and Action Plans Priority PBTs Tool Box I PBTs And You ( Resources What's New PBT Home I OPPT Home i EPA Home I Search I Comments Last Updated: March 09, 2001 URL: http://vvwvv.epa.gov/pbt/chlordane.htm file://A:\EPA's PBT Initiative Priority PBTs Chlordane.htra 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 1 of 12 Technical Links>Health Guidelines >Chlordane Disclaimer: These guidelines were developed under contract using generally accepted secondary sources.The protocol used by the contractor for surveying these data sources was developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH),the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),and the Department of Energy (DOE).The information contained in these guidelines is intended for reference purposes only.None of the agencies have conducted a comprehensive check of the Information and data contained in these sources.It provides a summary of information about chemicals that workers may be exposed to in their workplaces.The secondary sources used for supplements 111 and 1V were published before 1992 and 1993,respectively,and for the remainder of the guidelines the secondary sources used were published before September 1996.This information may be superseded by new developments in the field of industrial hygiene.Therefore readers are advised to determine whether new information is available. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH GUIDELINE FOR CHLORDANE INTRODUCTION This guideline summarizes pertinent information about chlordane for workers and employers as well as for physicians, industrial hygienists, and other occupational safety and health professionals who may need such information to conduct effective occupational safety and health programs. Recommendations may be superseded by new developments in these fields; readers are therefore advised to regard these recommendations as general guidelines and to determine whether new information is available. SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION * Formula C(10)H(6)CI(8) * Structure For Structure, see paper copy) * Synonyms octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanoindine;octachloro-2,3,3a,4,7,7a- hexahydro-4,7-methanoindene; CD-68; velsicol 1068; toxichlor; niran; octachlor; gamma-chlordan; chlortox; dowchlor; kypchlor; kilex lindane * Identifiers 1. CAS No.: 57-74-9 2. RTECS No.: PB9800000 3. DOT UN: 2762 28 (organochlorine pesticides, liquid, flammable, toxic, n.o.s. flash point less than 23 degrees C (73.4 degrees F). Note: If carrier solvent has flash point above 23 degrees (73.4 degrees F), the DOT UN: 2995 28 should be used http:/lwww.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidehnestcblordane/recognition.htnil 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 2 of 12 s 4. DOT label: Flammable liquid, poison(organochtorine pesticides liquid, flammable, toxic, n.o.s. flashpoint less than 23 degrees C degrees F) * Appearance and odor Chlordane is an odorless, thick, colorless to amber-colored liquid. The commercial product has a chlorine-like odor. An odor threshold of part per million (ppm) parts of air has been reported. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES * Physical data 1. Molecular weight: 409.76 2. Boiling point(at 2 mm Hg). 175 degrees C (347 degrees F)-decomposes 3. Specific gravity: 1.57 to 1.67 at 15.5 degrees C (60 degrees F) 4. Vapor density: Data not available. 5. Melting point: 95 to 96 degrees C (203 to 204.8 degrees F)-Pure solid; 102.8 to 109.9 degrees C (217 to 228 degrees F) 6. Vapor pressure at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F): mm H 9 7. Solubility: Insoluble in water; miscible with aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon solvents, including deodorized kerosene. 8. Evaporation rate: Data not available. * Reactivity 1. Conditions contributing to instability: High temperatures, other ignition sources, and contact with incompatible chemicals, or solvents, emulsifiers, or diluents that have an alkaline reaction 2. Incompatibilities.Chlordane is incompatible with strong oxidizers and alkaline reagents. 3. Hazardous decomposition products. Toxic gases and vapors such as hydrogen chloride, chlorine, phosgene, and carbon monoxide may be released in a fire involving chlordane. 4. Special precautions: Chlordane wilt attack some forms of plastics, rubber, and coatings. It is corrosive to iron and zinc. * Flammability Chlordane itself is non-combustible. However, the materials used as carrier solvents (e.g_ kerosene) are often flammable_making the mixture In use.a flammable or http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLR'C/healthguidelines/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 3 of 12 combustible mixture. The National Fire Protection Association has not assigned a flammability rating to chlordane. 1. Flash point: 107.2 degrees C (225 degrees F) (open cup)-in kerosene solvent 2. Autoignition temperature: 210 degrees C (410 degrees F)-in kerosene solvent 3. Flammable Hmits in air (percent by volume): Lower, 0.7 percent; upper, 5 percent- in kerosene solvent 4. Extinguishant: For small fires use dry chemical, carbon dioxide, water spray, or alcohol-resistant foam. Use water spray, fog, or alcohol-resistant foam to fight large fires involving chlordane. Fires involving chlordane should be fought upwind from the maximum distance possible. Keep unnecessary people away; isolate the hazard area and deny entry. Isolate the area for 1/2 mile in all directions if a tank, rail car, or tank truck is involved in the fire. Emergency personnel should stay out of low areas and ventilate closed spaces before entering. Vapors may travel to a source of ignition and flash back. Vapors are an explosion and poison hazard indoors, outdoors, or in sewers. Containers of chlordane may explode in the heat of the fire and should be moved from the fire area if it is possible to do so safely. If this is not possible, cool fire exposed containers from the sides with water until well after the fire is out. Stay away from the ends of containers. Personnel should withdraw immediately if a rising sound from a venting safety device is heard or if there is discoloration of a container-due to fire. firefighters should wear a full set of protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus when fighting fires involving chlordane. EXPOSURE LIMITS * OSHA PEL The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit(PEL) for chlordane is 0.5 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m(3)) of air as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) concentration. The OSHA PEL also bears a "Skin" notation, which indicates that the cutaneous route of exposure (including mucous membranes and eyes) contributes to overall exposure [29 CFR 1910.1000, Table Z-1]. * NIOSH REL The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has established a recommended exposure limit (REL) for chlordane of 0.5 mg/m(3) as a TWA for up to a 10-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek. NIOSH also assigns a "Skin" notation to chlordane, and considers chlordane to be a potential occupational carcinogen [NIOSH 1992]. * ACGIH TLV The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has assigned chlordane a threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.5 mg/m(3) as a TWA for a normal 8-hour http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/health&dehnes/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 4 of 12 Workday and a 40-hour workweek. The ACGIH also assigns a "Skin" notation to chlordane, and lists chlordane as having been identified by other sources as a suspected or confirmed human carcinogen [ACGIH 1994, p. 15]. * Rationale for Limits The NIOSH limit is based on the risk of potential for cancer, central nervous system effects, skin and mucous membrane irritation, kidney, and nerve damage (also liver cancer reported in animals) [NIOSH 1992]. The ACGIH limit is based on the risk of systemic injury [ACGIH 1991, p. 245]. HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION * Routes of Exposure Exposure to chlordane can occur through inhalation, ingestion, eye or skin contact, and absorption through the skin [Sittig 1991]. * Summary of toxicology 1. Effects on Animals: Chlordane is a carcinogen, a potent toxin to the central nervous system, and a liver toxin in experimental animals. Upon contact, it is irritating to skin, eyes and mucous membranes. It is also a mutagen in mammalian cell systems and has been shown to cause reproductive effects in animals. The oral LD(50) for rats is mg/kg and 145 mg/kg for mice; and the dermal LD(50) in rabbits is mg/kg [NIOSH 1995]. Chronic exposure has resulted in degenerative changes in the liver, renal tubules, lungs, intestinal submucosa, and heart. Because it is stored in body fat, chlordane has a high potential for cumulative neurotoxicity [Gosselin 1984]. Rats administered 5, 10, 30, 150, or 300 ppm chlordane in their diet showed liver and myocardial damage at the doses above 150 ppm [ACGIH 1991]. At dosages above 30 mg/kg in the diet, chlordane interfered with reproduction in rats, but this effect was reversible after exposure ceased [Hathaway et al. 1991]. Chlordane tested positive in mutagenicity tests in several different animal systems [NIOSH 1995]. In a gavage study in mice, both males and females in the high-dose group developed a significantly increased dose-related incidence of liver cancer. In the 1987 report, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that there was limited evidence for the carcinogenicity of chlordane in animals [IARC 1987]. 2. Effects on Humans: In humans, chlordane is a convulsant and potent central nervous system toxin. The fatal human dose of chlordane is estimated to range from 6 grams to 60 grams, and convulsive symptoms have occurred after ingestion of as little as 2.25 grams [Hathaway et al. 1991]. When a municipal water system was contaminated in 1976 with chlordane, 13 of 105 persons exposed reported both gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms [Hayes and Laws 1991]. Chlordane is rapidly absorbed through the skin. In one instance, a worker who spilled a 25 percent suspension of chlordane on clothing that was not removed began having convulsions 40 minutes later and died shortly thereafter [ACGIH 1991]. Case reports have linked chlordane exposure with the development of neuroblastoma, aplastic anemia, and acute leukemia [Hathaway et al. 1991]. However, a recent study of 800 workers employed at a chlordane production plant for 3 months or more during the period 1946-1985 showed a slightly lower than expected overall death rate and an inverse relationship between cancer mortality and length of employment at the plant http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/chlordane/recogn tion.htmi 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 5 of 12 [Hathaway et al. 1991]. In the 1987 report, IARC concluded that there is insufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity of chlordane in humans[IARC 1987]. * Signs and symptoms of exposure 1. Acute exposure: Inhalation and skin absorption of chlordane have caused blurred vision, cough, confusion, muscular incoordination and delirium in workers; ingestion has caused mouth burns, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; severe intoxication has caused blurred vision, irritability, tremor, staggering, convulsions, psychoses, central nervous system depression, bronchopneumonia, anuria, and death [Patnaik 1992; Genium 1993]. 2. Chronic exposure: Prolonged exposure has been linked with neuroblastoma and acute leukemias [IARC 1987]. EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROCEDURES * Emergency medical procedures: [NIOSH to supply] 5. Rescue: Remove an incapacitated worker from further exposure and implement appropriate emergency procedures (e.g., those listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet required by OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard [29 CFR 1910.1200]). All workers should be familiar with emergency procedures, the location and proper use of emergency equipment, and methods of protecting themselves during rescue operations. EXPOSURE SOURCES AND CONTROL METHODS The following operations may involve chlordane and lead to worker exposures to this substance: * The manufacture and transportation of chlordane Note: The U.S. EPA cancelled the registration for commercial production, delivery, sale, and use of chlordane in April of 1988 Methods that are effective in controlling worker exposures to chlordane, depending on the feasibility of implementation, are as follows: Process enclosure Local exhaust ventilation General dilution ventilation Personal protective equipment Workers responding to a release or potential release of a hazardous substance must be protected as required by paragraph (q) of OSHA's Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard [29 CFR Good sources of information about control methods are as follows: 1. ACGIH [1992]. Industrial ventilation--a manual of recommended practice. 21st ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 2. Burton D7 [1986]. Industrial ventilation--a self study companion. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidehnes/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 6 of 12 3. Alden JL, Kane JM [1982]. Design of industrial ventilation systems. New York, NY: Industrial Press, Inc. 4. Wadden RA, Scheff PA [1987]. Engineering design for control of workplace hazards. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 5. Plog BA [1988]. Fundamentals of industrial hygiene. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council. MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE OSHA is currently developing requirements for medical surveillance. When these requirements are promulgated, readers should refer to them for additional information and to determine whether employers whose employees are exposed to chlordane are required to implement medical surveillance procedures. * Medical Screening Workers who may be exposed to chemical hazards should be monitored in a systematic program of medical surveillance that is intended to prevent occupational injury and disease. The program should include education of employers and workers about work-related hazards, early detection of adverse health effects, and referral of workers for diagnosis and treatment. The occurrence of disease or other work- related adverse health effects should prompt immediate evaluation of primary preventive measures (e.g., industrial hygiene monitoring, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment). A medical surveillance program is intended to supplement, not replace, such measures. To detect and control work-related health effects, medical evaluations should be performed (1) before job placement, periodically during the term of employment, and (3) at the time of job transfer or termination. * Preplacement medical evaluation Before a worker is placed in a job with a potential for exposure to chlordane, a licensed health care professional should evaluate and document the worker's baseline health status with thorough medical, environmental, and occupational histories, a physical examination, and physiologic and laboratory tests appropriate for the anticipated occupational risks. These should concentrate on the function and integrity of the eyes, skin, central nervous system, liver, kidneys, and lungs. Medical surveillance for respiratory disease should be conducted using the principles and methods recommended by the American Thoracic Society. A preplacement medical evaluation is recommended to assess medical conditions that may be aggravated or may result in increased risk when a worker is exposed to chlordane at or below the prescribed exposure limit. The health care professional should consider the probable frequency, intensity, and duration of exposure as well as the nature and degree of any applicable medical condition. Such conditionswhich should not be regarded as absolute contraindications to job placement) include a history and other findings consistent with diseases of the eyes, skin, central nervous system, liver, kidneys, or lungs. http://www.osha-sle.gov/SLTC/health&delines/chlordane/recognition.htrd 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 7 of 12 Occupational health interviews and physical examinations should be performed at regular intervals during the employment period, as mandated by any applicable Federal, State, or local standard. Where no standard exists and the hazard is minimal, evaluations should be conducted every 3 to 5 years or as frequently as recommended by an experienced occupational health physician. Additional examinations may be necessary if a worker develops symptoms attributable to chlordane exposure. The interviews, examinations, and medical screening tests should focus on identifying the adverse effects of chlordane on the eyes, skin, central nervous system, liver, kidneys, or lungs. Current health status should be compared with the baseline health status of the individual worker or with expected values for a suitable reference population. * Termination medical evaluations The medical, environmental, and occupational history interviews, the physical examination, and selected physiologic or laboratory tests that were conducted at the time of placement should be repeated at the time of job transfer or termination to determine the worker's medical status at the end of his or her employment. Any changes in the worker's health status should be compared with those expected for a suitable reference population. Because occupational exposure to chlordane may cause diseases with prolonged latent periods, the need for medical surveillance may extend well beyond the termination of employment. * Biological monitoring Biological monitoring involves sampling and analyzing body tissues or fluids to provide an index of exposure to a toxic substance or metabolite. By analogy to other chlorinated pesticides, chlordane levels in the blood should be a useful indicator for determining worker exposures.However, no biological monitoring test acceptable for routine use has yet been developed for chlordane. WORKPLACE MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT Determination of a worker's exposure to airborne chlordane is made using an OSHA Versatile Sampler (OVS-2) 13 mm XAD-2 tube (270/140 mg sections, 20/60 mesh) with a glass fiber filter enclosed. Samples are collected at a maximum flow rate of 1.0 liter/minute until a maximum collection volume of liters is reached. The sample is then treated with toluene. Analysis is conducted by gas chromatography using an electron capture detector (GC/ECD). This method (OSHA 67) is described in the OSHA Computerized Information System [OSHA 1994] and is fully validated. NIOSH Method No. for chlordane) also relies on GC/ECD for sample analysis, but involves sample collection with a mixed cellulose ester filter (MCEF) and chromosorb 102 tube [NIOSH 1994b]. PERSONAL HYGIENE PROCEDURES If chlordane contacts the skin, workers should immediately rinse with flooding amounts of water for at least 15 minutes followed by washing the affected areas with soap and water. Do not scrub because this will increase dermal absorption. Clothing contaminated with chlordane should be removed immediately, and provisions should be made for the safe removal of the chemical from the clothing. Persons laundering the clothes should be informed of the hazardous properties of chlordane, particularly its potential for causing systemic poisoning by dermal absorption. http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healMguideTmes/chlordane/recopition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 8 of 12 A worker who handles chlordane should thoroughly wash hands, forearms, and face with soap and water before eating, using tobacco products, using toilet facilities, applying cosmetics, or taking medication. Workers should not eat, drink, use tobacco products, apply cosmetics, or take medication in areas where chlordane or a solution containing chlordane is handled, processed, or stored. STORAGE Chlordane should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area in tightly sealed containers that are labeled in accordance with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard [29 CFR 1910.1200]. Aluminum, aluminum-clad, or high-baked phenolic enamel-lined metal containers should be used for storage. Containers of chlordane should be protected from physical damage and should be stored separately from strong oxidizers and alkaline reagents. SPILLS AND LEAKS In the event of a spill or leak involving chlordane, persons not wearing protective equipment and fully-encapsulating, vapor-protective clothing should be restricted from contaminated areas until cleanup has been completed. The following steps should be undertaken following a spill or leak: 1. Notify safety personnel. 2. Remove all sources of heat and ignition. 3. Issue a warning as to the toxic nature of chlordane. 4. Ventilate potentially explosive atmospheres. 5. Do not touch the spilled material; stop the leak if it is possible to do so without risk. 6. Water spray may be used to reduce vapors, but the spray may not prevent ignition in closed spaces. 7. For small liquid spills, take up with sand or other noncombustible absorbent material and place into closed containers for later disposal. 8. For large liquid spills, build dikes far ahead of the spill to contain the chlordane for later reclamation or disposal. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements for emergency planning, reportable quantities of hazardous releases, community right-to-know, and hazardous waste management may change over time. Users are therefore advised to determine periodically whether new information is available. * Emergency planning requirements http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidehnes/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 9 of 12 Employers owning or operating a facility at which there are 1,000 pounds or more of chlordane must comply with EPA's emergency planning requirements [40 CFR Part 355.30]. * Reportable quantity requirements for hazardous releases A hazardous substance release is defined by EPA as any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment including the abandonment or discarding of contaminated containers) of hazardous substances. In the event of a release that is above the reportable quantity for that chemical, employers are required to notify the proper Federal, State, and local authorities [40 CFR The reportable quantity of chlordane is 1 pound. If an amount equal to or greater than this quantity is released within a 24-hour period in a manner that will expose persons outside the facility, employers are required to do the following: Notify the National Response Center immediately at (800) 424- or at (202) 426-2675 in Washington, D.C. [40 CFR 302.6]. Notify the emergency response commission of the State likely to be affected by the release [40 CFR 355.40]. Notify the community emergency coordinator to the local emergency planning committee (or relevant local emergency response personnel) of any area likely to be affected by the release [40 CFR 355.40]. * Community right-to-know requirements Employers who own or operate facilities in SIC codes 20 to 39 that employ 10 or more workers and that manufacture 25,000 pounds or more of chlordane per calendar year or otherwise use 10,000 pounds or more of chlordane per calendar year are required by EPA [40 CFR Part to submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventory form (Form R) to EPA reporting the amount of chlordane emitted or released from their facility annually. * Hazardous waste management requirements EPA considers a waste to be hazardous if it exhibits any of the following characteristics: ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity as defined in 40 CFR 261.21-261.24. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) [40 USC 6901 et seq.], EPA has specifically listed many chemical wastes as hazardous. Chlordane is listed as a hazardous waste under RCRA and has been assigned EPA Hazardous Waste No. U036. It is approved for land disposal after treatment and only if the concentration of chlordane in the waste or treatment residual does not exceed .13 mg/kg. Providing detailed information about the removal and disposal of specific chemicals is beyond the scope of this guideline. The U.S. Department of Transportation, EPA, and State and local regulations should be followed to ensure that removal, transport, and disposal of this substance are conducted in accordance with existing regulations. To be certain that chemical waste disposal meets EPA regulatory requirements, employers should address any questions to the RCRA hotline at (703) 412-9810 (in the Washington, D.C. area) or toll-free at (800) 424-9346 (outside Washington, D.C.). In addition, relevant State and local authorities should be contacted for information on any requirements they may have for the waste removal and disposal of this substance. http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidehnes/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 10 of 12 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION * Conditions for respirator use Good industrial hygiene practice requires that engineering controls be used where feasible to reduce workplace concentrations of hazardous materials to the prescribed exposure limit. However, some situations may require the use of respirators to control exposure. Respirators must be worn if the ambient concentration of chlordane exceeds prescribed exposure limits. Respirators may be used (1) before engineering controls have been installed, (2) during work operations such as maintenance or repair activities that involve unknown exposures, (3) during operations that require entry into tanks or closed vessels, and (4) during emergencies. Workers should only use respirators that have been approved by NIOSH and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). * Respiratory protection program Employers should institute a complete respiratory protection program that, at a minimum, complies with the requirements of OSHA's Respiratory Protection Standard [29 CFR 1910.134]. Such a program must include respirator selection, an evaluation of the worker's ability to perform the work while wearing a respirator, the regular training of personnel, respirator fit testing, periodic workplace monitoring, and regular respirator maintenance, inspection, and cleaning. The implementation of an adequate respiratory protection program (including selection of the correct respirator) requires that a knowledgeable person be in charge of the program and that the program be evaluated regularly. For additional information on the selection and use of respirators and on the medical screening of respirator users, consult the latest edition of the NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic [NIOSH 1987b] and the NIOSH Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection [NIOSH 1987a]. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Workers should use appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment that must be carefully selected, used, and maintained to be effective in preventing skin contact with chlordane. The selection of the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g., gloves, sleeves, encapsulating suits) should be based on the extent of the worker's potential exposure to chlordane. The resistance of one type of PPE material to permeation by chlordane >70 percent is shown below: Material Breakthrough time (hr) teflon To evaluate the use of this or other PPE materials with chlordane, users should consult the best available performance data and manufacturers' recommendations. Significant differences have been demonstrated in the chemical resistance of generically similar PRE materials (e.g., butyl) produced by different manufacturers. In addition, the chemical resistance of a mixture may be significantly different from that of any of its neat components. Any chemical-resistant clothing that is used should be periodically evaluated to determine its effectiveness in preventing dermal contact. Safety showers and eye wash stations should be located close to operationsthat involve chlordane. Splash-proof chemical safety goggles or face shields (20 to 30 cm long, minimum) http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidehnestchlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 11 of 12 should be worn during any operation in which a solvent, caustic, or other toxic substance may be splashed into the eyes. In addition to the possible need for wearing protective outer apparel e.g., aprons, encapsulating suits), workers should wear work uniforms, coveralls, or similar full- body coverings that are laundered each day. Employers should provide lockers or other closed areas to store work and street clothing separately. Employers should collect work clothing at theend of each work shift and provide for its laundering. Laundry personnel should be informed about the potential hazards of handling contaminated clothing and instructed about measures to minimize their health risk. Protective clothing should be kept free of oil and grease and should be inspected and maintained regularly to preserve its effectiveness. Protective clothing may interfere with the body's heat dissipation, especially during hot weather or during work in hot or poorly ventilated work environments. REFERENCES ACGIH [1991]. Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. 6th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. ACGIH [1994]. 1994-1995 Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. ATS [1987]. Standardization of spirometry -- 1987 update. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis Baselt RC [1980]. Biological monitoring methods for industrial chemicals. Davis, CA: Biomedical Publications. CFR. Code of Federal regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Office of the Federal Register. DOT [1993]. 1993 Emergency response guidebook, guide 28. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Hazardous Materials Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration. Forsberg K, Mansdorf SZ (1993]. Quick selection guide to chemical protective clothing. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Genium [1993]. Material safety data sheet No. 877. Schenectady, NY: Genium Publishing Corporation. Gosselin RE, Smith RP, Hodge HC [1984]. Clinical toxicology of commercial products. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams &Wilkins. Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, Hughes 7P, and Fischman ML [1991]. Proctor and Hughes' chemical hazards of the workplace. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Hayes W7, Laws ER [1991]. Handbook of pesticide toxicology. San Diego,CA: Academic http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/health&delines/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 Chlordane Page 12 of 12 Press, Inc. IARC [1987]. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Supplement 7. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lewis RJ, ed. [1993]. Lewis condensed chemical dictionary. 12th ed. NewYork, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. Mickeisen RL, Hall RC [1987]. A breakthrough time comparison of nitrile and neoprene glove materials produced by different glove manufacturers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J Mickelsen RL, Hall RC, Chern RT, Myers JR [1991]. Evaluation of a simple weight-loss method for determining the permeation of organic liquids through rubber films. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J NIOSH [1987a . NIOSH guide to industrial respiratory ry protection. Cincinn ati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-116. NIOSH [1987b]. NIOSH respirator decision logic. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-108. NIOSH [1992]. Recommendations for occupational safety and health: Compendium of policy documents and statements. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 92-100. NIOSH [1994a]. NIOSH.pocket guide to_chemical hazards._Cincinnati,_OH:-U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-116. NIOSH [1994b]. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113. NIOSH [1995]. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances: Chlordane..Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer, Technical Information Branch. NJDH [1987]. Hazardous.substance fact sheet: Chlordane. Trenton, NJ:.New Jersey Department of Health. http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/chlordane/recognition.html 6/4/2002 ATSDR- ToxFAQs: Chlordane t t� Pagel of 5 ATsD- R Search f Index I Home Glossary Contact Us AGENCY CES MIDIDSEA+E Back to List of ToxFAQsT RELATED RESOURCES PDF File for Printing (See PDF Info) TE?xFAQss*w for Public Health Statement Toxicological Profile Chlordane Minimal Risk Levels Division of Toxicology CAS#57-74-9 CONTENTS September 1995 Summary What is it? This fact sheet answers the most frequently asked health questions What happens to it in the about chlordane For more.information,you may call the ATSDR environment? Information Center at 1-888-422-8737 This fact sheet is one in a How might I be exxpgsed series of summaries about hazardous substances and their health to it? effects. This information is important because this substance may How can it affect my harm you. The effects of cqesrre to any hazardous-substance depend health? on the dose; the duration,-how you are exposed,personal traits and How likely is it to cause habits, and whether other chemicals are present. cancer? Is there a medical test for exposure? SUlYUK"Y:Exposure to chlordane occurs mostly from Are there federal eating contaminated foods,such as root craps,meats, recommendations? fish,and shellfish,or from touching contaminated soil. High levels ofchlordane can cause damage to-the nervous Glossary system or liver.This chemical has been found in at least Contact for more 171 of 1,416 National Priorities Ust sites identified by the information Environmental Protection Agency. More extemal safety and chemistry information What is chlordane? (Pronounced klor'dane) Chlordane is a manufactured chemical that was used as a pesticide in the United States from 1948 to 1988. Technical chlordane is not a single chemical,but is actually a mixture of pure chlordane mixed with many related chemicals. It doesn't occur naturally in the environment. It is a thick liquid whose color ranges from colorless to amber. Chlordane has a mild,irritating smell. Some of its trade-names are Octachlor and Velsicol 1068. Until 1983, chlordane was used as a pesticide on crops like corn and citrus and on home lawns and gardens. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ttacts3l.html 6/4/2002 ATSDR- ToxFAQs: Chlordane Page 2 of 5 Because of concern about damage to the environment and harm:to human health,the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)banned all uses of chlordane in 1983 except to control termites. In 1988, EPA banned all uses. What happens to chlordane when it enters the environment? • Chlordane entered the environment when it was used as a pesticide on crops, on lawns and gardens, and to control termites. • Chlordane sticks strongly to soil particles at the surface and is not likely to enter groundwater. • It can stay itrthe soil for avw 20 year&_ • Most chlordane leaves soil by evaporation to the air. • It breaks-dawn.very slowly._ • Chlordane doesn't dissolve easily in water. • It builds up in the tissues of fish,birds, and mammals. How might I be exposed to chlordane? • By eating crops grown in soil that contains chlordane. • By eating fish or shellfish caught in water that is contaminated by chlordane. "y breathing air or touching soil near homes treateAl for termites . By breathing air or by touching soil near waste sites or landfills. How can chlordane affect my health? Cblane affects the nervous system,the digestive system,and the liver in people and animals. Headaches,irritability, confusion;weakness,vision problems,vomiting, stomach cramps, diarrhea,-and jaundice-have occurred in people who breathed air containing high concentrations of chlordane or accidentally swallowed small amounts of chlordane. Large amounts of chlordane taken by mouth can cause convulsions and death in people. A man who had long-term skin contact with soil containing high levels of chlordane had convulsions. Japanese workers who used chlordane over a long period of time had minor changes in liver function. Animals-given high-levels of chlordane by mouth for short periods died or had convulsions. Long-term exposure caused harmful effects in the liver of test animals. We do not know whether chlordane affects the ability of people to have children or whether it causes birth defects. Animals exposed before birth or while nursing developed behavioral effects later. http://www.ats&.cdc.gov/tfacts3l.htnfl 6/4/2002 ATSDR- ToxFAQs: Chlordane Page 3 of 5 How likely is chlordane to cause cancer? The International Agency for Research on Cancer has determined that chlordane is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. Studies of workers who made or used chlordane do not show that exposure to chlordane is related to cancer,but the information is not sufficient to know for sure. Mice fed low levels of chlordane in food developed liver cancer. Is there a medical test to show whether I've been exposed to chlordane? Laboratory tests can measure chlordane and its breakdown products in blood,fat, urine, feces, and breast milk. The amount of breakdown products measured in body fat or breast milk does not tell how much or how long ago you were exposed to chlordane or if harmful effects will Occur. Has the federal government made recommendations to protect human health? In 1988'the EPA banned all uses of chlordane. The EPA recommends that a child should not drink water with more than 60 parts of chlordane per billion parts of drinking water(60 ppb)for longer than 1 day. EPA has set a limit in drinking water of 2 ppb. EPA-requires spills or releases of chlordane into the environment of 1 pound or more to be reported to EPA. The Food'and Drug Administration(FDA)limits the amount of chlordane and its breakdown products in most fruits and vegetables to less than 300 ppb and-in animal fat and fish to less than 100 ppb. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA),the National Institute for Occupational Health and 8afety(NIOSH), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists(ACGIH) set a maximum level of 0.5 milligrams of chlordane per cubic meter (mgW)in workplace air for an 8-hour workday, 40-hour workweek. These agencies have advised that eye and skin contact should be avoided because this may be a significant route of exposure. Glossary Carcinogenicity: Ability to cause cancer. Long-term: Lasting one year or longer. Milligram(mg): One thousandth of a gram. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ttacts3l.html 6/4/2002 ATSDR- ToxFAQs: Chlordane Page 4 of 5 Pesticide: A substance that kills pests. ppb: Parts per billion. References Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry(ATSDR). 1994. Toxicological profile for chlordane. Atlanta,GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Public Health Service. Where can I get more information? ATSDR can tell you where to find occupational and environmental health clinics. Their specialists can recognize, evaluate, and treat illnesses resulting from exposure to hazardous substances. You can also contact your community or state health or environmental quality department if you have any more questions or concerns. For more information,contact: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop E-29 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 1-888-422-8737 FAX: (404)498-0057 External safety and chemistry information(please see our disclaimer): Chlordane C10H6C% AA&L Stereo Image MDL Molfile rr NFPA Label Kev Vermont SMI MSDS Archive ATSDR Information Center/ATSDRIC@cdc.gov/ 1-888-422-8737 This page last updated on June 11, 2001 http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts3 Lhtml 6/4/2002 ATSDR- ToxFAQs: Chlordane Page 5 of 5 r ATSDR Home I Search I Index I Glossary I Contact Us About ATSDR I News Archive ( ToxFAQs I HazDat I Public Heafth Assessments Privacy Policy I External Links Disclaimer I Accessibilfty U.S.Department of Heafth and Human Services http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts3 l.htrd 6/4/2002 William Phillips 345 Barber Hill Road South Windsor CT 06074 May :30, 2002 Planning and Zoning 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 RE: Vintage Hills Barber Hill Road Dear Members: I live two houses down from the proposed subdivision. I strongly support the application of Jacques Construction for this project as I had with the original application. Furthermore, I strongly urge the board to approve this project while keeping the open space as passive recreation and not disturbing the wildlife or natural beauty of the pond area. Sincerely, _P , 'zl�/ William Phillips June 4, 2002 MT- Kevin McCann Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 RE: Vintage Hillis Dear Chairman McCann: Vintage Hills, as proposed by Jacques Construction LLC, is a beautiful subdivision with large lots and custom built, luxury homes. Approval of this subdivision includes over 8 acres of open space, as well as preservation of a large pond that covers approximately 2 acres=There are very few large ponds in South Windsor. The open-space is-contiguous to the Dzen Tree Farm,wlthall-homes being constructed away from the tree farm. This was achieved by reducing the subdivision from 19 lots to 17 lots,as requested by the Commission. This will be an exceptional development that the Town of South Windsor can be proud of, as we strive to continue to meet all of the housing needs of our community. I strongly support this project and would encourage you to approve this application this evening. Sincerely yours, Jo J. Mi ell 40 Windy ill -South Windsor, CT May 30, 2002 Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 As a lifelong resident of South Windsor, I wanted to communicate my support and approval of the Vintage Hills project. The layout of this project and the offering of larger lots it sets this subdivision apart from the rest in South Windsor. Very truly yours, Sheila Trombly 360 Long Hill Road South Windsor CT May 18,2002 Planning and Zoning Members Town of South Windsor Re: Interest in Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Town of South Windsor: I'd like to reiterate my support for the approval of this project. As indicated in m previous letter, I am relocating from New Hampshire and have had my � g P difficulty finding a subdivision in which to build my new home. I have chosen to stay with Jacques Construction to build my home in this subdivision in spite of the delays. Unfortunately, I cannot wait much longer. I do have a lot reserved in another Town, however, South Windsor is my first choice. I am requesting the Town expedite the approval of this subdivision. The plans exhibit a development that is aesthetically appealing with the homes constructed on big lots that are not clustered together which I was only able to find in your surrounding towns. Please approve this project. I look forward to becoming a member of your community. Regar s, Helen and Kevin Leach �x h ►b , t- I June 3, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Members of the Board: Earlier this year I wrote you a letter communicating my support of the original proposal of Vintage Hills. Up until last year, 1 was a resident of South Windsor and moved out of town because the subdivisions in Town did not offer larger lots. I have a business that I still operate in Town, so it was not a very easy decision to leave. I am again expressing my approval of this subdivision. I am urging the Town to expedite the approval of this project before more residents of our Town leave in search of subdivisions that offer the character that Vintage Hills offers. Very Truly Yours, Deborah and Daniel Freeman 60 Deming St. South Windsor, CT 06074 To whom it may concern: We like the idea of a 17 lot subdivision. The larger lots are very appealing. We have built a house with Jacques Construction and might be interested in one of these lots. The open space to be kept in its natural state will create a buffer for the subdivision. Sincerely, Delphis A. DuFresne Stefanie F. DuFresne ex h t b J k, 135 Abbe Road South Windsor, CT 06074 June 3, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 To Whom It May Concern: We would like to voice our support of the proposed subdivision of Jacques Construction, LLC, Vintage Hills, on Barber Hill Road. We have first-hand knowledge of John Jacques's honesty and integrity. We believe him to be a sincere businessman with an unimpeachable reputation, and are confident that should he be allowed to proceed, the outcome would be in keeping with the character and charm of South Windsor. Respectfully submitted, ; o �Jgffirey A. Moss v Lisa M. Moss ��-h b i - L- May 20, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills Application Dear Commission Members: I am writing to communicate my support of the Vintage Hills Subdivision. I live one street over from Barber Hill and would like to see a subdivision of this type in my neighborhood. Very truly yours, Mr. and Mrs. Perras 178 Abbe Road South Windsor, CT May 18, 2002 Town of South Windsor Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Application Vintage Hills To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to express my support of the revised application for the Vintage Hills Subdivision. I live down the stree3 feel that this project will complement my neighborhood. Sincerely, It, Donald Dzen C-)hi,b►� g 365 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, CT 06074 June 2, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commision 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 RE: Proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Commission Members: Please be advised that we are in support of the 17 lot Vintage Hills Subdivision. We own property adjacent to the project on the southerly side. The proposal allows for a buffer between our home and the homes to be constructed. I am in favor of keeping the open space area in it' s natural habitat to preserve the rural character of this land. Sincerely, Larry and Debbie Spieker lI. LOCATION OF S>vTy2C CE SEWAGE DMOSAL SYSTEMS The following minimum separating distances are required and shall be maintained between any part of a subsurface sewage disposal system which carries or treats sewage or septic tank effluent and the items listed below. Tables 2 through 2D list specific applications whereby certain type piping may encroach less than the distances stated below. h TABLE NO. 1 ITEM SEPARATING SPECIAL PROVISIONS DISTANCE r (1)Separation distance shall be doubled where the soil has a A. Well,spring or domestic minimum percolation rate faster than one minute/inch and there water suction pipe. is less than 8 feet between the bottom of the proposed leaching ent system and ledge rock.Doubling of the separation distance will 0 Required withdrawal rate be waived if a minimum of 4 feet of slower than one under 10 gal.per minute 75 feet minute/inch naturally occurring soils are found between the 10 to 50 gal.per minute 150 feet bottom of the leaching system and ledge. over 50 gal.per minute 200 feet (2)Separation distance shall be increased as necessary to protect the sanitary quality of a public water supply well B. Human habitation on 15 feet Building shall have no footing drains adjacent inoverty C. Building served 15 feet Building shall have no footing drains When not located on a public water supply watershed, this D. Open watercourse 50 feet distance shall be reduced as necessary to not less than 25 feet on lots in existence prior to the effective date of this regulation and thereafter recorded as required by statute E. Public water supply 100 feet S reservoir Drains constructed of tight pipe with rubber gasketed joints or F. Surface or groundwater drain 25 feet accepted equal (see Table 2-C) are exempted from this constructed of solid pipe requirement,except that no such drain shall be less than 5 feet from leaching system G. Groundwater intercepting 25 feet Tight pipes listed in Table 2-C are exempted from this drains,footing or requirement as long as the pipe is not backfilled with free foundation drain located draining material up gradient from sewage disposal system H.Any down gradient drainage system, ' 50 feet (1)No such drain shall be constructed down gradient from the' installed to collect and redirect leaching system on the same property for the purpose of groundwater,such as,loose or open collecting sewage effluent no matter what the separating jointed,perforated,slotted or pervious distance pipe drains,or piping backfilled with (2)The location of a septic tank/pump chamber/grease trap free draining material,located down may be reduced to a minimum of 25 feet if determined to be gradient from a sewage disposal watertight(For concrete tanks in accordance with Sec.9.2 of system ASTM C-1227 Specifications) See Section V(4 1. Top of cut or filled embankment 10 feet Down gradient and all sides J. Property line 10 feet K. Potable water and/or irrigation lines which flow under X 10 feet - - pressure L. Below ground swimming 25 feet pool M.Above ground swimming 10 feet Includes hot tubs pool Structure shall have no footing drains N. Accessory structure 10 feet Structures without jell wall frost proactrd footings may be. reduced to a minimum of S feet S*&...tci 1/1/00 17 Jan 16 02 02: 5Ep 860-291 -8757 p. 1 HIGHLAND SOILS uc January 11, 2001 Bang Ellison Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE., VIN7:-1GE HILLS SUBDIVISION BARBER H7I,L ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Dear Barry: I have completed a review of the subdivision plans with respect to the soils and location of the proposed septic systems and offer the following comments. The property contains moderately well drained soils overlaying a compact glacial till_ The property has been in agicultural use for many years and the subsoil layer appears to have been eroded and/or incorporated into the topsoil layer. As a result, the compact glacial till is close to the ground surface in some of the deep hole test pits. Based on my experience as a soils scientist and as a former sanitarian, a seasonally perched water table can develop on top of the glacial fill.. The development of a perched water table depends on many factors, such as the slope of the till layer, the size of the watershed that feeds the area, the permeability of the till and subsoil and the type of vegetative cover. It is difficult to predict the height of a perched table or the duration that it may exist. However, the presence of mottling is one of the best indicators we have. In the absence of good soil indicators,such as mottling,the monitoring of standpipes during the wet season is a reliable way to map the presence, or absence, of a seasonally perched water table. If a perched water table does exist, curtain drains are extremely effective in controlling ground water. Curtain drains are well suited for areas that contain a compact glacial till. I had the opportunity to view a few of the test pits and found the glacial till to be very compact and would expect it to be of low permeability. The presence of mottling was not very distinct in the test pits that I viewed. Additionally, the watershed and contributing area for a majority of the property is lirnited and the development of a perched water table may also be limited. I have reviewed the test pit data developed by your office in conjunction with the Tuwn of South'Windsor's Health Department. In many of the test holes, mottling levels were indeterminate or non detectable Can all of the proposed lots in the subdivision no information exists that the ground water levels in the areas of the proposed septic systems is higher than 18 inches to the ground surface_ Thus, all of the lots appear suitable for the cAet2002106.doc P.O. Box 337,Storrs,Connecticut 06268 - (860)742.5868 Jan 16 02 02: 56p 860-291 -8757 p. 2 PAGE Two MR BARRY ELLISON JANUARY 11, 2002 location of a subsurface sewage disposal system. Additionally, the lots are large enough to accommodate changes in the location of the proposed systems or can accommodate curtain drains if deemed necessary•. At this point in the approval process I feel there is enough information to conclude the majority of the lots are suitable for the placement of septic systems. Since the wet season will.soon be upon us it may be prudent to place a standpipe on those lots where ground water indicators were not readily apparent. If a perched water table does develop, curtain drains should be used to control the perched water table. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please can me at (860)742-5868. 'eery truly yours, j� 4-- John P. Ianni Professional Soil Scientist c:'1et2002106.doc __ .. . _ - - - •� aau-�51-8757 !� 1 D=mber 6.2001 Tci Whom It May CQ=cM' Please be advised that Peter R. DeMaliic and Design ProfC55uonals,Inc, is hctzby authormed to sign auy a�.d All appiicatsons associated with the development of our proPer%v an Bober Hill Road to S.uth war.C;onwticut. Wz furth-r aut4o7iza tt,e s�bmusion of land use applications a330cutcd with the devslapUCM of this property. Sincerely, �-:staic of John pudic.Jr. 7By: Edward Pudim Administrator cc_Peter Dt;Maliie �G-CU✓ _ il��c�C;;z> z- 61-(1 ' F APR 2 6 Z002. SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, 1-2/v6:o.1 THU 17:54 f'rxiRl NU BUS51 Stormwater Management Plan Vintage Hills South Windsor, Connecticut Prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road :s South Windsor, CT 06074 Ax DPI Project No. 99-1430 50UTH`NI�lDSO�?w�N�IINO Q�-PT. December 10, 2001 Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Proposed Development 1 Off-Site Analysis 1 Peak Runoff control 2 Nonstructural Drainage System 2 Riparian Buffers 2 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Storm-water Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 3 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations 5 Conclusions 5 Appendices TR-55 Existing Conditions A TR-55 Developed Conditions B Detention Basin Reservoir Report C Detention Basin Routings D Storm Sewer Calculations E Introduction: The site is located on the west side of Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, Connecticut, and consists of a single parcel of land totaling 34.6 Acres. Portions of the site were used for farming, and the site contains a number of old barns and a farm pond. The site contains two sections of wetlands; one area along the frontage of the site on the south end which contains the farm pond, and a second area of wetlands along the north western end of the site. A small portion of the site drains to the wetlands along the western side of the site. A larger portion of the site drains to the southeast to the existing ditch that runs adjacent to the pond and drains off site to the south. A third portion of the site in the north east and central area of the site drains to the north off site. The area of the site draining toward the farm pond does not actually drain into the farm pond. The grades around the farm pond prevent surface water from entering the pond from the site. The only surface discharge to the pond is from a portion of the runoff from Barber Hill road. A cross culvert presently discharges in the vicinity of the pond. A portion of the storm flows from this culvert enter the pond. Proposed Development: The proposed development of the site includes the construction of public roadways to service 19 residential building lots. The site will be serviced by public water, and will have individual on-site septic systems for each house. The Storm drainage system proposed for the development includes the installation of storm-sewers within the proposed roadways, and a detention/Water Quality Basin in the vicinity of the existing pond. The proposed detention/Water Quality Basin will augment the existing pond without introducing direct runoff into the pond. Due to the restrictive soil conditions on the site, there is no practical potential for infiltration of runoff from the site into the ground. The Detention/Water Quality basin will provide full detention of storm flows for storms up to the 100 year design storm, and discharge at peak rates equal to or less than existing, and also provide water quality treatment for the smaller more frequent storm events. Off-Site Analysis: The site presently drains in three directions. The western end of the site drains to a wetlands area on site, and then offsite to the northwest. The north central portion of the site drains to the north offsite. The larger southern side of the site drains to the southeast off site via an existing ditch. The majority of the=proposed development of the site will be within the southern watershed draining off site to the south. The proposed detention/Water Quality Basin will be in this area adjacent to the farm pond. The site has been designed to continue to discharge in the three directions presently with peak flows under developed conditions approximately equal to or less than existing peak discharge rates. Peak Runoff Control: The site has been designed to continue to discharge in the three directions presently with peak flows under developed conditions approximately equal to or less than existing peak discharge rates. Nonstructural Drainage Systems: The site presently drains overland in three directions. Under developed conditions, the drainage to the northwest and north will continue to be overland with no structural measures utilized. The drainage to the south that presently enters the ditch around the farm pond at various locations will be collected under developed conditions into a storm drainage system and discharge to the proposed Detention/Water Quality Basin. The discharge from the basin will be to the existing ditch. Riparian Buffers: There is presently a tree farm on the south side of the site. The tree farm has cleared essentially to the property line and has left no buffer. To the maximum extent feasible, a buffer will be provided along the southern property line of the proposed subdivision. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the subdivision design. These measures include the following: 1. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of-silt fence around catch basins. 4. Use of the detention/water quality basin during construction as a sediment basin. 5. ' Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 6. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 7. Installation of construction entrance pads, and sweeping of roadways as needed. 8. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality: The detention/Water quality basin has been designed as a wet bottom basin with approximately 9" of depth below the outlet elevation for long term retention. The volume of runoff from a 1.5" rainfall event was determined from the TR- 55 analysis, and found to be approximately 8,200 CF of runoff. The volume of retention in the 9" depth below the outlet will be over 10,000 CF. Therefore, there is adequate volume of permanent pool retention for the runoff from the site. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to the detention/water quality basin. The piped drainage system has been designed to accommodate the runoff from a 10 Yr design storm. The detention/water quality basin has been designed to handle up to a 100 year design storm with full detention. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site presently discharges to three locations;to the northwest, north, and south. Under developed conditions, the discharges to the northwest and north will continue as overland flows with no structural controls. The discharge to the south will be via the proposed detention/water quality basin into the existing ditch that presently collects runoff from the site. Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water System, and Detention/Water Quality Basin. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide, and additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system_ Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. Catch Basins: The catch Basins within each lot shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reaches 1'. Pavement Sweeping: The public streets within the subdivision should be swepted a minimum of once a year; in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season. Basin Spillway: The stone spillway shall be inspected twice yearly. All large woody growth that may affect the flow of water or the stability of the spillway shall be removed. The spillway shall also be inspected after any flow passes through it. The riprap shall be re-arranged and added to as required to maintain the design as per the design plans. Topographic Contour Maps: Topographic contour maps have been provided showing the drainage areas for the site at a scale of 1"=100'. The maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included in the rear of this report. Floodplain Boundaries: There are no floodplain boundaries on the site. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The drainage piping on site was designed using the rational formula. The detention basin was sized using a computer program by Hydzographs called Hydroflow. The program allows for the development of hydrographs representing the developed flows into the basin, and the modeling of the basin with elevation/storage/discharge curves to represent the basin. The program than provides the routing of the hydrograph through the basin, and provides peak discharge and storage information. Under existing and developed conditions, the site will continue to drain in the three directions; to the northwest, north, and south. The TR-55 analysis for the existing discharge to the northwest, north, and south is included in appendix A. A summary of the discharges is as follows: Storm Freq. Discharge Northwest Discharge North Discharge South 2 1 0 3 10 4 1 13 25 5 3 20 50 7 5 26 100 9 7 33 The TR-55 analysis for the developed discharge to the northwest, north and south is included in appendix B. The summary of the results of the existing and developed discharges in the three directions is as follows: Design Freq. Northwest North South Exist. Devel. Exist. Devel. Exist. Devel. 2 1 1 0 1 3 12 10 4 4 1 3 13 28 25 5 6 3 4 20 38 50 7 7 5 6 26 47 100 9 9 7 7 33 57 The increase in runoff to the south due to the development of the roadways and lots would result in an increase in peak runoff in this direction. The proposed detention basin has been designed to mitigate this increase in peak runoff, and discharge under developed conditions at peak rates equal to or less than under existing conditions. The detention basin reservoir report is included in appendix C. The routing of the storm flows for the 2-100 year design storms are included in appendix D. The following table summarizes the peak flows under existing conditions to the south, and from the detention basin to the south. Storm Freq. Existing discharge to south Peak discharge from basin 2 3 2.94 10 13 12.31 25 20 15.98 50 26 20.09 100 33 23.50 As can be seen from the above, the proposed detention basin provides complete attenuation of the peak flows from the site to levels at or below existing peak flow rates. On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations: The storm sewer calculations for the storm piping within the proposed roadway are included in appendix E. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the rational formula. Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated Detention/Water quality basin, will mitigate any potential water quality and quantity impacts from the development of the site. APPENDIX A RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest ---------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Woods - grass combination good - 6.57(58) - 0.69 (79) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.57 •69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 60* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .129 i 0.296 Shallow Concent'd 300 .12 u 0.015 Shallow Concent'd 825 .026 u 0.088 Time of Concentration = 0.40* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense - U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest Data: Drainage Area 7.26 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 60 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area .69 Acres 9.5 % of Drainage Area ----------------------------------------------------------- ( Storm Number 1 1 ( 2 ( 3 1 4 1 5 1 (----------------------(------i------(------(------I------1 Frequency (yrs) ( 2 ► 10 ( 25 ( 50 ( , 100 1 I I I I I I I ( 24-Hr Rainfall (in) ► 3.2 ( 4.7 ( 5.5 ( 6.2 ( 6.9 I I I I I i I ( Ia/P Ratio ( 0.42 1 0.28 ( 0.24 1 0.22 ( 0.19 I I I I I a I ( Runoff (in) 10.41 ( 1.13 ( 1.60 12.05 ( 2.53 I I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.440 10.602 10.624 10.639 10.651 1 i (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I i I i I I I ( Pond and Swamp Factor( 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 1 5.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------(------1------(------1------1 1 Peak Discharge (cfs) 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to north ------------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) -------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 6.05(48) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.05 --------------------------------------------------- -------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 6.05 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER.T 48* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to north ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Sheet 3.2 100 .036 j 0.115 Shallow Concent'd 200 .036 u 0.018 Shallow Concent'd 550 .04 u 0.047 Time of Concentration = 0.18* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing _Conditions Discharge to north Data: Drainage Area 6.05 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 48 * Time of Concentration: 0.18 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE 1-Storm Number 1 1 I 2 1 3 i 4 I 5 I ----------1------1------I------1------1------I 1 Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 1 50 1 100 i I I I I I i i 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 I 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 ► 6.9 l I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 10.68 1 0.46 1 0.39 1 0.35 1 0.31 1 Used 1 0.50 1 0.46 l 0.39 1 0.35 10.31 I I I I i I I I l Runoff (in) i 0.09 10.48 ( 0.78 1 1.09 1 1.44 1 I i I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.392 10.465 10.623 10.713 10.769 1 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 11.00 11.00 l 1.00 1 1.00 1 1 0.0% Ponds Used I I i I I I i----------------------1------1------1------1---=--►------1 Peak Discharge (cfs) 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDS Fallow Bare soil ---- - - - 1.9(94) OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 7.69 (48) - Woods good - 8.0 (55) 3.71(70) - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 15.6 3.71 1.9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 21.3 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 59* -------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south --------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 200 .075 f 0.244 Shallow Concent'd 200 .07 u 0.013 Open Channel 1100 2 0.153 Time of Concentration = 0.41* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south Data: Drainage Area 21.3 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 59 * Time of Concentration: 0.41 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE i Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 ► 4 1 5 1 i----------------------1------1------1------1------1------1 1 Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 I 25 1 50 1 , 100 1 1 I I I I I I 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) i 3.2 I 4.7 I 5.5 ► 6.2 I 6.9 I 1 Ia/P Ratio 10.43 1 0.30 1 0.25 ( 0.22 1 0.20 1 I I I I L I 1 Runoff (in) 1 0.37 1 1.07 1 1.53 1 1.97 ► 2.44 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 10.409 10.589 10.612 10.628 10.640 i (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I i I I i I I I ( Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 11.00 1 1.00 1 1 0.0% Ponds Used 1 I I I 1 I 1----------------------1------►------►------►------1------1 1 Peak Discharge (cfs) I 3 1 13 1 20 ► 26 I 33 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford state: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest ------------------------------------------------------ Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------ FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) - Good condition; grass cover > 75% - .75 (61) - Impervious Areas - - Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - •18 (98) OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Woods - grass combination good - 5.64 (58) - 0.69(79) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.57 .69 ------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 61* ----------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .129 i 0.296 Shallow Concent'd 300 .12 u 0.015 Shallow Concent'd 825 .026 u 0.086 Time of Concentration = 0.40* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest Data: Drainage Area 7.26 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 61 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area .69 Acres 9.5 % of Drainage Area Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 {----------------------1------1------1------1------1------1 I Frequency (yrs) 1 2 1 10 { 25 1 50 1 100 { I I I I I I { 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 I 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 { 6.9 1 I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 10.40 1 0.27 { 0.23 1 0.21 { 0.19 I Runoff (in) 10.44 { 1.19 1 1.68 { 2.14 ( 2.63 1 { I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.467 10.608 10.630 10.644 10.655 1 { (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I i Pond and Swamp Factor► 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 i 5.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------1------I------I------(------{ Peak Discharge (cfs) I 1 1 4 1 6 1 7 ► 9 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-ROUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligar4 ,, i Michael Gantick, Thomas Field,Bill Canning, Kris Lindstrom, Ray Favreau, karl Reichle,Mel Stead, John Collins,Bob Deptula,Jeff Doolittle FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning&Engineering Departments have received.plans for the following project: Location: 0 Site Plan 45 Subdivision No. Acres q: S Zone 0 Industrial 0 Commercial Wf Residential No. Lots/Units Water: 0 Public 0 Private Well Sewerage: 0 Public O Septic system(s) Project Description: I -7 t',c,*� c t,�,�,��� `"f °7, 4� Future Town-owned property involved? )p Yes 0 No P�new street(s) anew detention area P new open space/recreation area O active 0 passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by � '-7 /o'L and return to the Planning Department. In-House Development Review Meeting 5-15-02 Present: Banach,Reichle, Stead,Folger,Doolittle,Gantick,Deptula 1. Vintage Hills Open Space Subdivision 2. Berry Farm Elderly Housing 1. Vintage Hills Open Space Subdivision • Cul-de-sac should extend to northern property line. • Updated drainage calculations have not been submitted.What is downstream? • Access to western portion of open space needed, and access to detention basin/outlets. • Any/all debris&contamination must be removed/remediated prior to Town acceptance of open space. • Septic system designs are critical for this site and must be submitted for Town Sanitarian and Town Engineer review. Staff concerns include possible utility conflicts, separating distances, final grades, elevation of till,construction protection of septic system areas. • Open space must be fully monumented(no iron pins). It is staffs recommendation to PZC that this application not proceed to public hearing until septic system questions and issues have been addressed and resolved. 2. Berry Farm • Entrance on Oakland Road—staff recommend either(1)allowing full access in and out,provided that an access easement is granted to the abutting Peterson property to the east,and construct the entrance boulevard accordingly so that there will be only one entrance on Oakland Road to serve both sites; or(2)right in-right out only,or(3)enter only,no exit. • Felt Rd will need to be improved, and drainage at the driveway intersection addressed. • Sidewalk to Felt Rd, so that residents can walk to Wapping Shopping Ctr • Would a walkway to Village at Buckland Court be beneficial? (There is a general physician's office there.) • Cuts&fills will need to be phased for E&S control DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. no civil engineers #planners # surveyors # gis May 17,2002 ; Town of South Windsor MAY 1 7 200Z 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor,Ct 06074 soali VNDSUR PLANNING DEP I-, Attn:Ms.Marcia Banach Town Planner Re:Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Marcia, We are writing in response to engineering comments dated May 6,2002 by J Doolittle dated 1/18/02,and comments contained in the In-House Development Review Meeting on 5-15-02. Our responses to the like numbered comments are as follows: 1. All proposed easements around yard drains on private lots have been removed. The proposed drainage easement in favor of the Town of South Windsor on the side of proposed lot#4 has been removed. The revised plan of development,specifically the decreased roadway length,has enabled us to route all of the stormwater to the detention basin via proposed catch basin#6. 2. The two proposed catch basins at the end of Vintage Lane have been oriented such that if Vintage Lane were to be extended in the future then only the tops of these catch basins would have to be replaced. Therefore,these catch basins have not been rotated. 3. The proposed grading along the front and left side of proposed lot#10 has been revised and spot-grades added. 4. As discussed at the prior P&Z hearings,the maximum area physically available for a buffer between this property and the property to the north,or along the rear of lots 10, 11,and 13-17 is fifteen feet,due to required septic system locations. There is an existing stonewall hedgerow. Roots from plantings could interfere with septic system leach fields. Neither zoning or subdivision regulations require such a buffer at this time. Our conclusion:we could provide a 10-15'hedgerow easement if required. 5. Footing drains have been shown on lots#5 and#17. 6. A text leader and note stating that existing vegetation shall be cleared north and south of the entrance to Vintage Lane to provide clear sight lines has been added to the plans. 7. The proposed sidewalks at the east end of Vintage Lane have been terminated with ramps to access Vintage Lane. 8. The location of the proposed stop sign on Nature's Way has been revised. 9. Additional labeling of existing contours has been added to the plans. The large area referenced is within the proposed Town open space. The remaining area without proposed contours is proposed to be undisturbed(please note proposed tree line). 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax:(860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis 10. The proposed foundation drain for the house on proposed lot#1 has been revised to discharge into proposed catch basin#2. 11. We are of the opinion that the proposed yard drain at the bottom of the driveway for proposed lot#8 is sufficient to handle surface runoff in this area. Any storm structure is subject to clogging by leaves,grass and other debris if not maintained. The nearest woods line to this proposed yard drain is greater than eighty(80)feet,thereby decreasing the likelihood of it becoming frequently clogged with leaves and/or branches. 12. A swale has been added to the north side of proposed lot#7 to divert surface runoff to proposed yard drain #2. 13. We have discussed this verbally with Jeff Doolittle,and are waiting for further input from Jeff. 14. The proposed public water and gas lines have been revised accordingly. 15. The elevations of the driveways at the houses can be approximated by the proposed garage elevations that are labeled at each proposed house. As you are aware,we are presently only in the application process. As such,the exact location and orientation of both houses and driveways are subject to change. We have shown locations that are agreeable to the applicant and meet the applicable subdivision regulations and public improvement specifications. With the exception of that for proposed lot#6,all proposed driveways are modestly sloped. The driveway for proposed lot#6 does include an approximate thirty(30)foot section that is sloped at or just below the maximum allowable slope of 151/o. We hope this information will facilitate your review and help speed up the building permit review process. 16. The outlet from the detention pond has been revised so that it now aligns with the existing watercourse. The riprap splash pad has been extended to twenty-five(25)feet. 17. An access road from Barber Hill Road to the detention basin has been shown to the south of Vintage Lane. 18. A flared end section and riprap splash pad has been called out for the existing drainage structures on the west side of Barber Hill Road to the south of Vintage Lane. 19. The rights to drain in favor of the Town of South Windsor have been taken off the proposed Town open space. 20. The intersection of Vintage Lane and Nature's Way has been revised to eliminate the flat spot at proposed elevation 326. Additionally,the top of frame elevation for proposed catch basin#17 has been revised on the plan&profile sheets to match that shown on the intersection grading detail. 21. We received a determination from Bob Deptula that all of the lots within the development were generally suitable for septic systems. That should suffice for subdivision approval. We are in the process of doing Anther analysis on the septic systems including groundwater monitoring. The additional analysis in our understanding is to provide additional information for the final design of the systems,and is not to prove suitability of the lots. As you are aware,each lot when it is developed will have a detailed septic design prepared showing the actual location of the house, septic system layout,etc. Obviously all of the systems will need to meet the Health code for separation distances etc. The need for curtain drains is not universal,and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis as part of the final individual house plot plan design. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 9 Fax:(860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers •planners . surveyors • gis 22. Underdrains have been included on the subdivision roadways in areas of cuts where the drains will be needed. 23. Monuments have been shown along Barber Hill Road in accordance with town Public Improvement Specifications. 24. Revised drainage calculations have been included with these revised plans. In House Development Review Meeting 5-15-02 1. There does not appear to be any reason to extend the cul-de-sac to the property line. This extension would cause undue expense for the developer,added expense to the town for maintenance,and added environmental impact for a section of roadway that may never be needed. We have provided the right of way,grading easements,all in accordance with town requirements. As far as we can tell,the regulations do not require paving to the property line. 2. Revised drainage calculations for the roadway are included. The detention/water quality basin has been designed in accordance with all town and state requirements for both water quality and quantity issues. Please note that the total roadway length on the site has been decreased,without any reduction in size of the basin. Downstream there are wetlands,watercourse,and eventually a pond. 3. Access has been provided as requested at the end of vintage lane,and off of Barber Hill Road. 4. Remediation to be done to the level required by the DER The applicants environmental Engineers have established a remediation plan. 5. In all subdivision approvals,the septic system feasibility for each lot must be demonstrated prior to approval of the subdivision plans. The extents required for proving this feasibility varies based on the soil conditions for each lot. We believe that through 3 rounds of soil testing,the involvement of a certified soil scientist,percolation testing,and numerous revisions,we have adequately proved the feasibility of the lots for septic systems. We understand that Bob has reviewed this project with the State Health Department also. We have received a letter previously from Bob Deptula regarding this. We have installed groundwater-monitoring wells on the site as an added measure. The groundwater monitoring wells were installed to determine if the mottling observed is accurate,or if the groundwater levels on the site are actually lower than the mottling reflects. Additional testing in the till layers on site by percolation (or permeability)testing will determine if the till really acts as a restrictive layer. All of this additional testing may allow for septic systems to be deeper into the ground. None of this additional testing is to prove suitability of the lots. We believe that based on worst-case scenarios we have shown that the septic systems will work on each lot. We are obviously concerned with the adequacy of the designed septic systems,and will work to address any specific concerns that may still exist. Open-ended statements concerning suitability of the septic systems cannot be addressed. If there are additional concerns,than we need specific details as to the concerns. 6. Open space to be monumented. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors • gis We believe that the lots as shown are suitable for septic systems. The project previously went before Planning and Zoning with 19 lots(Two more than presently proposed). There have been no changes in the layout of the lots that would warrant the recommendation stated. We believe that this project can and should go forward at this time to a Planning and Zoning Commission hearing,without delay. Please review the enclosed and call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, c� Galen Semprebon,P.E. Director of Engineering 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 a R O C 7 D STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN a Project Name: V �c dws Sheet No.: i z = N o Project Number: /y30 c Design By: -c Description: P�n�osc�l iru,s.,fe Check By: u_ _ _ U) w U z171 _ Z p z Zz ¢ Q Of O Hm � W � = Clw ^ ui Z O _J � ^ 2 � I— Z � w � Z O Z = 0U) LL � Ui V) W -� � � � > w U � cn f2= ?UJ 2►= W� OU �w �o: ¢ QU z ac aaw� uw -J vU (nUto Z z Jz ? u_ ? a aa ` .. j¢',\ a " av = � c C61 S.S 0,01 0,(,8 D;oZ o.02 S. /(ff Is— 23� OooS 3.R 1-16 t/-' 2 cgy s S.6 S� o,o, a-�o 0.o2 O.oq S"q 0.236 /s'' 268� C.002 �/.� 5-. 3 /8 2.yq b �% o.9S o.9S 3, 3.S/ %S" LT o,no 5- 3, Y,6 663- 6Q9 18.r� /S,/6 0,yo 0,G1 o.2y I l,l -,.7 yYo /S 2,5 QooS 3.F y6 C6q- cg6 / .z0 /SZ6 0, y6 D.Sy 0.ZS �LIg 3. S.vB l8" 6s' dons y,3 o.s3 o.�r 0.z6 o.z� 3 /.38 /S„ zI' o.00s 3,s y6 Qiu-CGis J �3 QZ3 o59 0,14 alb y3 013 /S� 23 O.00� 3.3 y6 661� -66f3 /3,/0 G.S 0 3 0.56 0.21 C,3% o IS IIS� o.00s -,$ y,6 cC2� -c/Si3 Iv — /o 0,09 0,53 o.oS 0,or 0,2.N lS" z3' o 00 3,8 y� c6i _ c.Qii It 0.30 o,so o,, o.s-g S-y 3_IS IS" 110' o.00s 3, y6 0.21lS y' 0(3 8 /N,0 ,o 6bo - (9// IZ,S — IZ, 0.1`/ D.5S o,o� 0.0q L1.3 0,3o /S 2 o.00S c61I- C(;I(o -4 o.3y 0,sZ 0-i .o`/ S.S► IS" 0a 0,00,7S N,� S$ yz - CBI( — 0,20 (,.kiI o,o$ c?.og 0.C1 18' )0,0, 3.9 q6 STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN Project Name: V�Tr ff���5 Sheet No.: Z z Project Number: /1/30 n Design By: Description: �ia�,�sr�� gl.a,:.aK► Check By: _ w _ U w c� z cn w _ z z ^ w w O z U z f- w U U Z 7Z � Q T w sZ y � UU z a z ¢ = W � �w w Z O� o ON � �w w ww w z LLJ z = www w � z ' w Z w � CL � . `r a" Uw - r > iz Z vi -� � � c C8q - cQl( 2,5- 0.29 o.Y� 0,r3 0.i5 S. Z 0.c8 /S" 3S� D,009y Cg /6-681} 13 $.S► 9.r 1 l,G! 0"/L/ ( S.Z ID. I 18 '�y �.OIo S.q /o,S (Qn-c6►$ S — S Q0-4 0,90 a& 0.0� y3' O.op�- CC►8 -ca0- ro I� 0,,11 o.yZ p.2o O.zG 5,2 l,o/ IS" 2-U' 0.oZ� 2.y IO.o cQr -c68 IS' 0.IV 2.3C 5. I lz.oy /g„ /38' o.ozz /o,S /o.r 0,3� 0,� o ,g o.�8 y,G 0,El /5" z3" 0.0c� C ag- Mo �,� 3A9 SA9 0,(9 0.`18 0.0q 2,(. S 0 /3,Ir 18 Zog' 0.OZL C - Out I?.S" 9.2� 9.29 0.3-+ 0,53 0.19 4.5 6 N.9 22.3q Z,0 2gS' o.00S t� m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074-2786 soR.co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 OFFICE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL May 21, 2002 Mr. Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear Mr. McCann: At its Regular Meeting of May 20, 2002, the South Windsor Town Council approved the following Resolution: WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has reviewed proposed Vintage Hills subdivision open space located on the west side of Barber Hill Road, across from the Town-owned Wildlife Sanctuary, and WHEREAS, the proposed open space received a favorable rating for Town ownership because of the pond, wooded areas and preservation of rural character; and, WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has recommended that the Town Council endorse acceptance of the proposed open space as Town-owned open space; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council endorses the acquisition by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the proposed Vintage Hills subdivision open space as Town open space. (Resolution Continued on Next Page) RECEI V 1L MAY 2d2nPO r Mr. Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Re: Resolution Regarding "Vintage Hills" Open Space Page 2 May 21, 2002 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council requires that the site be tested or analyzed for the existence of any environmental contaminants; and that any/all debris and/or contamination present on the subdivision open space be removed/remedied prior to future Town acceptance. Respectfully submitted, atricia R. Brown Clerk of the Council Cc: Matthew B. Galligan, Town Manager Patricia Botteron, Chairperson, Open Space Task Force Marcia Banach, Director of Planning tOW 4f4 O! GSOR CV SOV1 M dE+ °. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soe•co� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 May 22, 2002 MAY 2 2 2002 Mr. Barry Elison SOUTH V'tI DSOo !'Li;; N;i�,c uEp1. Design Professionals 165 S. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Barry, As per our conversation of 5-20-02 regarding Vintage Hills subdivision, it is felt that due to concerns regarding elevations, drainage, separating distances of septic systems and other technical concerns regarding septic installation, it is necessary, and this project would best be served by submission of a final septic design for each proposed lot, with the exception of the one or two lots we discussed, prior to final approval. This would ensure that all proposed lots are approved for septic and no lots would be rejected at a later date due to a system not being able to be installed per State Health Code. Feel free to contact me to discuss this matter or any regulations or requirements at 644-2511, ext. 248. Yours truly, Robert Deptula, R.S. Environmental Health Officer RD/cm cc: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning ✓ May 22, 2002 Kahan Kerensh & CaposselaLLP Harold Cummings, Esq. Cummings, Lanza and Purnhagern, L.L.C. MAY 2 2 2002 1610 Ellington Road P.O. Box 667 SOUTH WINDSop,PLANPJjAiC_DEpr Michael A.Bars South Windsor, CT 06074 William E.Breslau Joseph P.Capossela RE: Mongeon Claim: Property of Pudim Suzanne E.Caron William J.Dakin Dear Hal; Mark W.Dietz Solomon Kerensky Your May 15 letter was on my desk when I arrived on May 16, 2002. My Michael J Mangan*.Kopsick Laurel office informed Joe Mongeon of this letter and the draft proposed settlement D. Dorian L.Reiser agreement on Monday afternoon, May 20, 2002. This morning I met with Joe to Stephen E Sutton review the contents of your letter of May 15, 2002 and the draft proposed settlement Antoinette M.Webster agreement and have the following to report. Jeffrey M.Winnick* After receipt of your letter of April 9, 2002 and our subsequent telephone Robert Kahan conversations, I advised Joe that he should expect a new subdivision application to be (1922-1996) filed with a new plan showing the parcel to be conveyed to him. Prior to receipt of *also admitted in MA your letter of May 15, Joe and I had not spoken further on this matter because I had told him that I thought that he could monitor your reapplication on his own, since he is a knowledgeable real estate broker. Sometime at the end of April or early May he learned of your reapplication and was stunned to find that the new subdivision Van t did not depict the parcel to be conveyed to him under the terms of your April 9' letter. At that point Joe embarked on further investigations regarding the Pudim property and your client's subdivision application which have led him to raise more issues. At this point, he is not prepared to sign the proposed settlement agreement. He would like very much to speak further with Mr. Jacques or with you directly. You may take this letter as my clear authority for you t T speak directly with my client, Very t ly yours, Telephone (860) 646-1974 Joseph Capossela Facsimile (860) 647-8302 JPC:drr Enclosures 45 Hartford Turnpike cc: Joe Mongeon P 0-Box K jeapossela@kke-law.com Vernon,CT 06066-2181 LAMWONGEON,RJOSEPH#6997\13oundary Line Dispute-Adjustment#6987-001\Mongeon Cummings 5-22-02.doc attorneyscDkkc-lawcom wwwkkc-lawcom MEMORANDUM R E C EE'' To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning July 4 2002 From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer SOUTH WINDSOC�rr1L,V,,`NING Date: 6/3 2 RE: App 02-21 P—Vintage Hills Subdivision, Barber Hill Road I have reviewed the revised subdivision application (dated 5/17/02) for the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision. Most of my previous comments have been addressed. However, I still have the following comments: 1. Show a 15 foot easement along the northerly property boundary to preserve the existing stone wall and hedgerow, and to provide a physical separation between this subdivision and the farmed property to the north. 2. 1 still feel at least one catch basin is needed at the bottom of the driveway for Lot 8 to catch surface runoff that will flow down the driveway before it gets to the road. There will be a significant amount of surface runoff to this structure. This structure(s) should be selected base on a hydraulic analysis of the inlet size needed to handle this surface flow. If a yard drain is selected, it should be located as close to the driveway as possible, and there should be a paved leak-off from the driveway to the yard drain. The driveway needs to be pitched toward this catch basin. 3. Check the grading and contours near the road and sidewalk in front of lots 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. Contour 334 appears to be incorrect where it is shown crossing the sidewalk in these locations. These grades should agree with the Town Sidewalk Detail. 4. A yard drains is needed in the front of Lot 6 to the left of the driveway, before the street line to catch surface runoff coming down the hill. 5. The driveway for Lot 6 does not appear to conform with the Town Residential Driveway Detail. The 334 contour does not appear to be correct, and the driveway is too steep just behind the sidewalk and street line. Check this driveway and revise as necessary. We still request that driveway grades and slopes be shown on the proposed subdivision plans to facilitate our review. 6. The outlet pipe from the catch basin on Barber Hill Road will probably have to be lower(by 1 foot or more)to accommodate future drainage in Barber Hill Road. Show the top of frame elevations for the two catch basins proposed in Barber Hill Road. We would appreciate any other survey information you have along this road that would be useful in drainage design for this area. We will discuss any additional S drainage work that is needed in this area with the applicant and coordinate this work with the site contractor. 7. Final Design plans need to be reviewed and approved by the Town Environmental Health Officer for the proposed septic systems. The septic systems will need to include curtain drains and meet the required separation distances. 8. Underdrains need to be shown under both sides of the entire length of these roads due to soil conditions and the probability of high groundwater. The fills are not very deep and the roadway construction will impact native soils. The exact locations and lengths of these underdrains can be determined In the field by the Town Engineer once construction has begun. Underdrains will not be required in areas where they are not necessary. 9. The Typical Sidewalk Detail on sheet 19 needs to be revised to conform with the Town Sidewalk Detail 10. 1 did receive revised drainage calculations. I still need a drainage area map, headwater analysis, and some of the calculations may need to be checked. I will call the Engineer about the drainage calculations for this subdivision. Please call me at extension 245 if you have any questions. 1 J Appl #02-21P, Vintage Hills Subdivision Public Hearing 06-04-02 1. Request for approval of a subdivision to create 17 lots on Barber Hill Road, RR zone. The site size is 34.59 acres. 2. Minimum lot size required in the RR zone is 40,000 sf. The minimum lot size proposed is just over 40,000 square feet. 3. The applicant is proposing to provide a 50' road stub for possible road extension to the north. Staff strongly recommend that if approved, the cul-de- sac and utilities extend to the property boundary. If this is not done, the possibility of a future extension becomes greatly reduced because the residents of this subdivision have become so accustomed to having what appears to be a permanent dead-end, and that neighborhood opposition is always difficult to overcome. 4. In accordance with Section 4.c of the subdivision regulations, the application includes 20% of the land to remain as open space. The open space is located mainly along the south and east boundaries of the site, and includes the pond. The subdivision regulations provide that any land reserved for surface water runoff, such as detention basins, regulated wetlands, waterbodies, brooks and streams shall not be considered as meeting the requirements of open space, except when in the judgment of the Commission such land is deemed to be of benefit to the recreation areas in Town and/or upstream or downstream watersheds. In no case shall more than one-half of said land be considered for open space requirements. Staff recommend that half credit be allowed for the existing pond but no credit toward open space be given for the detention basin that bisects the property into two halves. There does not appear to be an easy way around the basin on the open space property, for anyone walking on the open space to get from one side to the other side. As required by the subdivision regulations, the Town Council reviewed the proposed open space for desirability as future Town-owned land. At its regular meeting on May 20, 2002, the council passed the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has reviewed proposed Vintage Hills r subdivision open space located on the west side of Barber Hill Road, across ` from the Town-owned Wildlife Sanctuary, and p WHEREAS, the proposed open space received a favorable rating for Town ownership because of the pond, wooded areas and preservation of rural character; and, WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has recommended that the Town Council endorse acceptance of the proposed open space as Town-owned open space; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council endorses the acquisition by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the proposed Vintage Hills subdivision open space as Town open space. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council requires that any/all debris and/or contamination present on the subdivision open space be removed/remediated prior to future Town acceptance. 5. There are regulated wetlands on the property. The application was approved in its former configuration by IWA/CC on February 20, with a bond in the amount of$25,000 to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures and a bond in the amount of$10,000 to ensure the establishment of the detention basin and plantings. IWA/CC also requires that the conservation easement lots T6;+,t andi,2 is to be established prior to the issuance of building permits on these lots. 1� ,c' 0 ' 6. The plan shows only one lot with a new driveway onto Barber Hill Road Sidewalks are shown on both sides of the new streets. 7. The site will be serviced by public water and septic systems. Site conditions are very difficult for septic systems on this property; and Environmental Health Officer Bob Deptula has indicated that because of concerns regarding elevations, drainage, separating distances of septic systems and other technical concerns regarding septic.system installation, it is necessary and this project would be best served by submission of a final septic system design for most of the proposed lots, prior to PZC approval. This would ensure that all proposed lots are able to be served by septic systems and no lots would be rejected at a later date due to a system not being able to be installed per State Health Code. This will also ensure that lot-to-lot drainage will be adequate and acceptable; some Commissioners will recall that poor lot to lot drainage in finished subdivisions has been the cause of many problems over the years. In fact, in at least one instance, the Commission itself paid thousands of dollars for solutions to poor lot to lot drainage in a new subdivision because neither the builder nor the developer would take responsibility for fixing the lot to lot drainage problems. 8. There are some sight line improvements needed; this can be accomplished by clearing vegetation. Also proposed for clearing are two existing trees located in close proximity to Barber Hill Road 9. Street trees are shown on both sides of all streets. 1 k 6L 6 -tj�- 4 1O.Staff recommend that the hearing for this application be continued so that necessary plan revisions can be completed. If this application is approved, Planning Dept requests the following modifications in addition to those already noted: • Plan should reflect the open space calculation • Total acreage of subdivision should be shown on key map .� �'? / ;. I - `.._q;, l � f � � � �.. . . i '- ` ' � ., ��l _ .. L ,1 �� r. _- ___- _�-- r, t �`� J' ' �,f .� _ <, � r ! �.t . V i MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe, Assistant Director of Planning I/ From: Robert Deptula, Environmental Health Officer R. Date: June 11, 2002 Re: Vintage Hills_ 17 Lot Subdivision, Barber Hill Road Additional information and plan modification provided by Design Professionals has addressed concerns regarding the subdivision expressed in correspondence to Design Professionals dated 5-21-02. It appears as though, conceptually, each proposed lot could support a septic system. Final approval cannot be given for each lot until a final, specific septic design for each one is submitted to ensure compliance with the Health Code. RD/cm cc: Barry Ellison Design Professionals 165 So. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer 10w M t� 01e S10-� VZtLQ�� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 °SOR.coN� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 May 21, 2002 Mr. Barry Elison Design Professionals 165 S. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Barry, As per our conversation of 5-20-02 regarding Vintage_Hills subdivision, it is felt that due to concerns regarding elevations, drainage, separating distances of septic systems and other technical concerns regarding septic installation, this project would best be served by submission of a final septic design for each proposed lot, with the exception of the one or two lots we discussed, prior to final approval. This would ensure that all proposed lots are approved for septic and no lots would be rejected at a later date due to a system not being able to be installed per State Health Code. Feel free to contact me to discuss this matter or any regulations or requirements at 644-2511, ext. 248. Yours truly, Robert Deptula, R.S. Environmental Health Officer RD/cm cc: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers a planners s surveyors s gis LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning Dept. Attn: Marcia and/or Marcia DATE: 06/11/02 Town of South Windsor RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision DPI PROD NO: 1430 WE ARE SENDING YOU: RECEIVE ® for your use JUN at your request ❑for approval ❑for your files for review and comment SOUTH NJrNDSOR PIAN�IN PST. other THE FOLLOWING: A 60 scale revised drawing of Vintage Hills Subdivision denoting the following three(3)changes relating to planning comments: 1. Revised open space configuration with calculations shown. Please note that the additional open space area has been gained by subtracting a triangular portion from the southeast corner of proposed lot#8. 2. A 15' wide hedgerow easement along the northern property line,excluding the section of proposed Town land where Vintage Lane may be extended in the future. 3. A 140' dimension line from the proposed house on lot 48 to the southerly property line. A note stipulating that this distance(minimum)must be adhered to will be put on the final plans,if approved. These proposed changes will be presented to the commission at tonight's public hearing. If you have any comments or suggestions please feel free to contact me. Thanks, Barry DESIGN PROFESSIONALS,INC. By. Ba Ellison,Jr. Project Engineer CC: 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 i i �j r� c, UA ze Z,J-Il l ,5 I TIC z cxAO 6-0 - - --- eF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis . gps June 14, 2002 Marcia Banach, Planning Director Town of South Windsor RECEIVED 1540 Sullivan Avenue JUN 1 8 ZO02 South Windsor, CT 06074 Re:Vintage Hills SubdivisiAUTH WINDSOR PLANNVNG DEPT DPI Project No. 01-1430 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut On behalf of our client, Jacques Construction, LLC, I hereby request a 90-day extension from the original filing date for recording the subdivision mylars in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank you. DESIGN P FESSIONALS, INC. By: 1 Peter R. DeMallie Principal cc: John Jacques Barry Ellison 1�'a�cl� Gwmrr�i«�5� tisq,• 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 +Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis .gps June 18, 2002 Marcia Banach, Planning Director J U N Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, CT 06074 Re:Vintage Hills Subdivision DPI Project No. 01-1430 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut On behalf of our client,Jacques Construction, LLC, I hereby request a second 90-day extension from the original filing date for recording the subdivision mylars in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank you. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: A , Peter R. DeMallie Principal cc: John Jacques Barry Ellison 11"011 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 t°wN SC4 0s� � S a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR•CON�`v TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL June 18, 2002 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 S. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT .06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Appl 02-21P, Vintage Hills Subdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on June 11, 2002, to approve with modifications application 902-21P, Subdivision of 35 acres to create 17 lots to be known as Vintage Hills on property located on the westerly side of Barber Hill Road and approximately 1,500 from the East Windsor town line, RR Zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc.,project#1430 and dated May 17, 2002, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for 17 lots, numbered 1-17. 2. Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on both sides of all new streets. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. Septic system final design(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Environmental Health Officer prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 6. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Chief of Police. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police (copy enclosed). 7. Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$25,000 for erosion& sediment control measures, and a bond in the amount of$10,000 for the establishment of the detention basin and plantings. 10. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 11. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 12. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 13. Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" =40', shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. 14. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding. All bonds shall conform to the enclosed bond policy and shall be posted prior to filing the final plans in the Town Clerk's office. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one-year term, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call-the Letter it is holding. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$850 shall be submitted to this Commission. +-'7-, No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 18. Cul-de-sac street must have a paved lip of six feet extending north. 19. The sight line improvements described in the applicant's traffic report (clearing of vegetation) are required. 20. A 15-foot hedgerow easement for the hedgerow must be incorporated along the northern property boundaries excluding the section of the proposed town land where Vintage Lane may be extended in the future. 21. Engineering review comments dated June 3, 2002, must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 22. The zoning data table should reflect the open space calculation and total acreage of the property. 23. A 140-foot dimension line from the proposed house on lot #8 to the southerly property line. A note stipulating this distance must be adhered to. -,' 24. The open space for this subdivision is to be town owned. Any and all debris and/or contamination present on the subdivision open space must be removed/remediated prior to acceptance by the Town. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets #4-7 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations) must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, must be 'reproduced on the mylars. After mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the To wn Clerk by July 19, 2002. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Enclosures cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Board of Education John Jacques Attachments: Deed/easement policy Bonding policy Quantity Estimate Lighting policy DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis .gps July 1,2002 RECENEU Marcia Banach, Planning Director Town of South Windsor JUL 5 2002 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Re:Vintage Hills Subdivision DPI Project No. 01-1430 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut On behalf of our client, Jacques Construction, LLC, I hereby request a pre-construction meeting with Town staff. Barry Ellison has submitted revised plans with PZC and IWA approval letters reproduced thereon. Thank you. DESIGN PRO ESSIONALS, INC. By: A//IZAK 'Peter-R. De allie Principal cc: John&Ann Jacques Barry Ellison 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755•Pax: (860)291-8757 t G'NN 8F� °. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SOR•coN TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 July 3, 2002 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl 02-21P, Vintage Hills Dear Mr. DeMallie: Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on June 25, 2002, to grant a 90-day extension and a second 90-day extension to file mylars for the above-referenced subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The new filing deadline is March 28, 2003. This extension is the final extension permitted under Connecticut General Statutes Section 8-25. Sincerely, Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission KM1 cC/kah t f i t O.NN sf4 s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 OR•CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 July 15, 2002 John Jacques 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Jacques: Re:Preconstruction Meeting—Appl 02-21P, Vintage Hills Subdivision IN ATTENDANCE Michele Lipe TOSW 644-2511 ext 252 Jeff Doolittle TOSW 644-2511 ext 242 Jeff Folger TOSW 644-2511 ext 229 Karl Reichle TOSW 548-6366 Jim Slater J &H Slater Const. Co 75 Commerce Way 528-5252 Bernie Drabek TOSW 644-2511 ext 241 Melvin Stead, Jr. TOSW 648-6366 Sgt. Tom Field TOSW 644-2551 Bob Deptula TOSW 644-2511 Peter DeMallie Design Professionals 289-7055 Galen Semprebon Design Professionals 289-7055 Barry Ellison Design Professionals 289-7055 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected (ringed with haybales or equal). 1 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Barber Hill Road. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist (requested, required) for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six (6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2) inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used-- storm pipe, structures,pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary) of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to paving and after subgrade formation. 9. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. 2 i 10. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 11. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to John Jacques in the field at phone#432-1823 (office) and 305-1861 (cell). 12. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 13. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 14. Forty-eight(48)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 15. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 16. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m., no work on Sunday. 17. DOT permit needed for all work within state road. Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 18. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 19. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore, the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 20. Inspection of gravel access roads required prior to placement of topsoil. 21. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as-builts. 22. For concrete sidewalks, 8": depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk is constructed before lot development, the locations must be indicated on the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. 23. If a concrete monument is located within a driveway, a cast iron frame and cover must be provided for town public improvement specifications. 3 24. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals, the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. 25. During construction for individual house lots, lot to lot drainage must be addressed with drainage swales as necessary must be in place first. For lawn establishment, town staff will be requiring erosion control measures to be installed prior to the issue of the certificate of occupancy to ensure soil stabilization. A detailed erosion control plan must be implemented and depicted on the plot plan for review prior to the issuance of the building permit — most particularly on lots with extensive grading. Operation and Maintenance Plan for CB should be provided to lot/homeowners. Critical!i! 26. Care should be taken with deep cuts on installation of utilities due to the presence of bedrock to avoid fractures. Town Sanitarian Comments 1. Snow fencing or silt fencing must be used to protect the areas of the septic systems from compaction by heavy equipment. 2. Adequate review time must be given at the time Building Permits and Certificate of Occupancies are requested. 3. All plans must have the note that the septic locations have complied with the "Health Code Technical Standards". This reference should also include the separating distances from drainage structures and materials used. 4. All separating distances must be shown on the plans. 5. The house as-built must show the reserved areas for septic with a note restricting use of this area. Planning Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional_landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. Quantity Estimates and bonds must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 3. Erosion and Sedimentation bond required before any earth moving. All bonds to be posted prior to the filing of mylars. 4. One model home has been approved by the PZC. 5. Liability policies must be submitted. 6. Quit claim deed for frontage along Barber Hill Road is required. 7. Conservation easements required to be staked in the field prior to the issuance of building permits. SNET/NU 4 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting (if required) to,be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. All blasting material should be removed from the trench and not used as backfill. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings,which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe, AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/n=l cc: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, Town Engineer Mel Stead,Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official 5 I �rcas••a` fttloh&Simpsein Enyinee's Inc. .f2e Main .`!r:;,':f ve V dsUwii'}G'Y,Ct ;>J 3-1W4 Wes*/gyp Q`g N G VE4 ltor�A VR�Ipsoi N a� �P.1:I if t 1 ShFH �8.`•:(j��l t yii�:, mill! 4Z C September 4. 2002 SEP 3 020OZ SU(/rN VVIIVDSO i PLI',"iRi NG Mr. John JacgL.es D�cfl. Jacques Construct on. L1.0 67 Ridge Roar] South `J4'indsoi,C`l' 06074 Re: Seal Pi'e.Sampling*and Analysis Vinta8,'; )dills Subdivision, Barber Hill Road, South Windsor, Connecticut bear Mr. Jacq tes: Wcston&Sampson Engineers hic. was retained by Jacques Construcii.on, LLC of:Solith Windsor, COMIC tiCtit, to provide environmental soil sampling and reporting sen•ices for two piles of top soil generated during site grading activities at the Vintage H1lls residential sul;division located on Barber Hill Road in South Windsor,Connecticut. 1.0 Background In Decen,lxr ,'001,Weston&Sitrtipsoa.i performed a soil and surface water investigation �,t the subjLct:)rope.rty to evaluate for envirownental impacts tiom firmer commercial fwming activities. The environmental investigation evaluated for residual inipacts related to storage and use of chemical pesticides, herbicides, petroleum products and potential inipa.cts related to a former 1,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank: (LW) that w�s rernoved from the property in 1988. A total of eloven (11)soil samples anti one(1)surface water sam.flc were collected from the property anti were submitted to Connecticut Testing L.ahoratories, inc., (CTL)of Meriden; Cornecticut for analysis for one or more of•the following: • Oi ganochlurine pesticides according to ,EFA Method 3081 A • Hi;rbicides according to EPA Method 8151 • E.tractalile total pc;troleunt hydrocarbons (ETPI•i) • .A••omatic hydrocarbon con1poun(s according to EPA Method 80-2,I(b) • V)latile Organic compounds according to F,PA Methc-d 8 260 • Total arsenic,lead,nickel,and zinc (i-nass analysis) Findings of tiic investigation included that four(4)ofthe rlcven (11) soil samples exceoded the Connecticut)7opartment of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) Renwdiatiou.Standard Regulations(RSR)pollutant Mobility Criterion for chlordane for .t t ':.+a:'&r4'tt< liiraeYicu[ l;h ::.ialertri ':t+rHnaR,Girc }f,ur.. - _ , •f- 5 C:�•,,, iC Fgx;t.'.'CLa.' rJ :._.�: ? A,b S , .JH ^G, `,' M _ ',aria f o A+\CYeiCC?:i 3.•r>:l+m7ta•;.e.'f i;�13^-Vifu War•m Cf•„ ;tfi;. '.,(P .•.Ir;};,P, +.. . . .. �'t „6C,. ,6i .t tat 74Y,o fn.•..a �. WOsfgn 8 SamOs�+:..nginChrS.1P.C. Mr. Jahn 7acyie'; Septefztbur 4, 602 Page 2 of" Cass"GA"V-o.undwater areas. No soil samples exceeded �uiy other CTDEP RSR. Pollutant Mobi.ity criteria or CTDEP RSR Residential Direct Exposrrr�Criteria for an selected analytical parameters Based on the di tceted chiordaate concentrations, Weston & Satnpstati.rec;orti ttcrded addressing the inl,acted soils at the property in accordance w'itl) th-CTDEP (iuidanzl- Document on Development of Ag icultural Properies (March 1999). The soil rnana ement option that was selected by Jacques construction, as outlined in the C'fT)EP guidance d0CLI1110nt,included soil mixing and re-analysis. 2.0 Field Sampling Activities Or, Auyast13, 2002, Weston & Sampson collected a total of six (0) soil samples, fi-otn two piles of top-soil generated by Jacques Constntction during site grading and development a"tivities. The six (6)soi t samples,designated Pile-1 SS-1 through SS-3 and Bile;-2 SS-4 throtialh SS-6 were collected by hound auger sampling equipment. The six (6) soil sarnplos were submitted to C TL for analysis for chlordane according to EPA Method S{)R I A, as requested by the"l'own of South Windsor Dopartment of Health. 3.0 Labor story Analytical-Data and Conclusions Laboratory soil data indicated tImt none of the six soil samples ccyntained concentrations of chlordane move laboratory method detection limits (50 parts pl;r billion (ppb)). Therefore the ;ix soi', samples were reported it)be below applicable CTDEP RSR pollutant mob lity criterion(66 ppb)and residential direct expostr,-e criterion(490 ppb) for chlordane. Laboratoi�,data sheets are included as Attachment T. Weston &Sampson appreciatcs the opportututy to be of co;7tini.ted service to Jacques Construction 1,LC. Please call.Mitchell R. Chester at(860) 659 668 to discuss this project. Very truly yours, WESTON& ;.A MI PSON ENOTNEERS, TtiC. rly Mitchell R. Ci1GSter, L.EP Project Mami;er attach. coon GZRTflt048? 111 7.o fT IN ("0 60� ATTACHMENT t iUAo - f:79ur-tosm 'd; � nir.r Tug +r�rz;�n 09.103i02 TUL 14:29 F.C'. 203 630 1336 CONN TESTING LIB �001 Page f Date Samples Rec:ived 8/23/02 Client Name: W aston&Sampson CTL Lab No. 0802.344 Report[)ate. 8!;9l02 PC!.lab No. : 20-1 39 z i _RESULTS OF ANI j. SI5 EPhone st-�t�Fox Note 7671 o Pcjl jR6r,s From Z-TLMetEPA hod 8081, q Phone x Far,k $.C�c.�� fax k Matrix Typo: S Chlordane-ppb Field ID CTt,0 MDL Pile 1, SS-1 _ 13966 50 Pile 1, SS-2 W�-----�-— Bel — _.. -- - 13Ati7 1 50 BDL Pile 1 SS-3� ! 93968 50� 1 Pile 2 SS-4 ,__ �, _ ff 3969 50 9DL — --- pint 2, SS �^__I ?39700 BDL le 2, SS_$ -_..T397i SO EESDL MDL=Minimum Delectable Level 1 SOL=Below Detection L6 vel Matrix Type:W=Water/Aqueous S=SOKSolid 0=0iVHydroc;irbon Connecticut Testing Laboratories,Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue/Meriden,CT 06461 (203)634-3731 (Fax)630.1336 Certificatlen CT-PM05471 MA•CT035 V o 0 In 7 - gOwN 8�7 �i u A �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �OsoR.co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 September 25, 2002 Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Peter: Ol-it Re: P Vintage Hill Subdivision Bond Phase 1 &2 This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on September 24, 2002, to set the subdivision bond for Appl QyHP, Vintage Hills Phase 1 at $355,400.00 and Phase 2 at$277,13 0.00. 01?_a I? A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. Sincerely, k�i _ Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission KMcC/kah cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning Enforcement Officer John Jacques TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Phone No. °"' i Address Site Name � �� P&Z No. �. A Owner ,/�� Phone No. Contractor Signature of OAer Date: Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) AN Ad. rj .Wow-* Reason for Change: (Why is change required) APPROVALS: (As Required) Dix. Of Planning_a 4 AA i ,X Date: Town Engineer Date: r3 Dir. of Public Wo kll Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: VEp AUG .S 9n0 2 White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant SOUTH WjNDS08RANNiNGpf PT, , Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department 4A SOWN SF4 co C� Toulq-z' V/ S-OtzA ?di 5 � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SORTO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 April 20, 2004 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: A ppl#02-21 P,Vintage Hills Phase I and II Dear: Mr. Jacques: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on April 13, 2004 to reduce the subdivision bonds for the above reference project Phase I and II as follows: CURRENT REDUCTION BALANCE 02-21P,Vintage Hills Ph. 1 $112,600 $ 77,060 $ 35,540** 02-21P Vintage Hills Ph. 2 $277,130 $157,430 $119,700 "maintenance expires on 4/13/05 Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currf-atly_hoLdingn�showin his-miucxion_at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, d ,.,L 0 0/--L Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: TQ�- �eer Chief Building Official �'n:!'�g°° :�°'�Pm"'eR'(�'L'•�'''N'di.'{S7R :.• �Y�7sRYs-:. i .. - ,_ .. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON I Phone No. 291-$953 Address D883a n PC 0=ftiQW8, IM, ISS Booth ftta@ to Pd.. Soath WirAwz CT 06494 Site Name__IrirAZM IdUs iy ar3Qn P&Z No. 02-M Owner : Phone No.(960) 432-1823 ContractorJbhn Signature of Owner Date: 7AM2 wpm Signature of Design Engr. Date: 7!2$/42 CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) mutan twspaacatry out to allow amotroatim of a division in two (2) phaaw. min xytile as dwigned ark! ma d. Reason for. Change: (Why is change required To allm fee ►t iocl�4�d PPMUM in two (2) fie. APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir.. Of PlanningAjf 4. Date: f3L Town Engineer (Wit, Date ' Dir. of Public W rks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department ¢f TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION, GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PE ON� X&l� _ Phone No.Sl •'°-w-r:+r— A'ddress tsiM Prr�fe t: A. Inc., IRS South Mallite Rood, $Mth Windscre CT OW4 Site Name_ V4,t H1311a Mftdj3dgjgM Piz No. Owner_, 0matrwMan, LM Phone No. 11 ContractorJabn Signature of Owner � , Date: _ Signature of Design Engr. Date: Q CHANGE: (Describe location and nature change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) jgonll. flAMd min]yet drainage at- to?P- MOSOM 1. rA bets► IOU 15 1 R OF�mte3y 35 tam& norhh of Vintage Tana ftmactailk to he ine*A]1edal. an iwnrt Sal to wt4sting gMWG .d4}. Structt1m ta�'be emnsatAd to yard gain Y]_oa_aatwad CM !at 15, Reason for Change: (Why is change required) C'tiurtQii- li alIrwr +t , s,r to lapis at iw b�ter betre= lip Nuf w 'hi I G Mist of odatin ha-remd trr a_W MdMUM& tatai ing OPPXMQ 11t 5M A.F. (75#x11$e). Vh4W ori.oinal *wlga the area bet waft t 10M 15 a 16 rduid Ito rembe betut 6" and 24 of fill to trant gi t oyretlaM runoff to Yi. APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning 1 ' Date: Town Engineer r Date:— Dir. of Public WoAs Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: ,m► < tt•• }}, b White - Town Engineer Yellow -Applicant _ Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department December 2, 2004 Mr. Galen Semprebon, P.E. Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills (02-21P) Dear Mr. Semprebon, In response to your request to reduce the bond for Vintage Lane and Natures Way to maintenance and accept these roads, the following need to be received before this is done. 1. As-built plans for these roads (paper copies to review and a final mylar set) 2. Certification that all the pins and monuments have been set 3. A legal description and deed for the roads and open space 4. Filing of all other easements and rights as shown on the plans In addition the town staff inspected the roads and associated public improvements and found a few items that need to be addressed. 5. Replace the damaged curb in front of#27 Vintage Lane (55 feet) 6. Replace 2 stop signs and posts with heavier posts and 30 inch signs per Town standards. 7. Install painted stop bars at the end of Vintage Lane and Natures Way. 8. Back-up sidewalks with topsoil where needed, (ie on Natures Way) 9. Install a paved leak-off in front of lot 6 Natures Way so water from hill drains to street and does not run on or get trapped on the sidewalk. 10.There were many lumps of asphalt emulsion that were stuck to the pavement on Vintage Lane to the east of Natures Way. These were deposited during the final paving of the end of Vintage Lane and Natures Way and should peel off during the winter snow removal operations. However, if they do not peel off this winter, they will have to be removed later. 11. Install 2 handicap ramps across Natures Way where it intersects Vintage Lane. (in 2005) 12.The sidewalks need to be completed in front of lots 4, 10, 11 and around the cul-de-sac at the end of Vintage Lane. (in 2005) 13. Complete Landscaping per approved plan. (in 2005) If you have any questions please call me at 644-2511 ext. 245. Sincerely, Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer cc: John Jacques Bernie Drabek Mel Stead, Jr. VOL. 1522PAGE 201 a � Of HEDGEROW EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of December 2002, by and between VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, having its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTOR", and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTEE"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is the owner of real property, hereinafter described, situated on westerly side of Barber Hill Road in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that it would be in the public interest to retain a Hedgerow Easement on a portion of the premises of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined at the landscaping of said property can best be accomplished by the securing by the GRANTEE of a Hedgerow Easement over, across and upon a portion of the said property of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is willing, in consideration of the need to provide for the Hedgerow Easement, to grant to the said GRANTEE, the easement hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for the continuation of said premises as a Hedgerow Easement; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR intends to convey the property described herein to certain purchasers subject to this Hedgerow Easement and by granting said Hedgerow Easement to the GRANTEE shall not change the character of private ownership of said property and the public shall have no right to enter upon same. NOW, THEREFORE, the said GRANTOR does hereby give, grant, bargain and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever the right, privilege and authority as a Hedgerow Easement and restriction, to plant and perpetually preserve, hedgerows in their present condition a fifteen foot (15) wide hedgerow along each side of the streets as shown on Schedule A attached hereto. THE GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS FURTHER COVENANT AND AGREE: 1. To maintain said hedgerow; and 2. To prohibit and refrain from the following operations, unless prior written consent is obtained from the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agency or successor, on the premises conveyed herein: a. the construction or placing of buildings, structures, roads, signs or fence; CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATES LOCAL$ -No. TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR VOL. 15 2 2 PAGE 202 b. the dumping or placing of soil, leaves and yard wastes, etc., or other substances or materials as landfill or dumping or placing of trash, ashes, waste, rubbish,junk, garbage or unsightly or offensive materials; c. the excavation, dredging or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other mineral substance; d. the removal or destruction of trees within the Hedgerow Easement area. The GRANTOR reserves unto itself, its successors, and assigns the right to continue to use the property subject to said Hedgerow Easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the terms hereof. The grant of the Hedgerow Easement shall in no way grant anyone other than the parties hereto the right to enter upon the property subject to the easement. The GRANTEE, or its lawful agents, may enter the property for the purpose of inspection and ensuring that the terms hereof are properly enforced. The foregoing Hedgerow Easement shall be permanent and shall be binding upon the GRANTOR and its successors and assigns, and shall insure to the benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights, privileges or authority unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, VINTAGE HILLS, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of December 2002. Signed, Sealed and Delivered In the Presence of GRANTOR: VINTAGE HILLS, LLC By ohn Jacqu a a er/Member GRANTEE: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR By L.S. atthew B. Galligan, Town Ma er VOI. 1522PAGE 203 STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) ) ss. South Windsor December t , 2002 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, VINTAGE HILLS, LLC, acting herein by JOHN JACQUES, its Manager/Member, duly authorized, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed, and the free act and deed of a sole company, before me. Harold R. Cummings Commissioner of the Superior Court STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ra<L? ss. South Windsor Deeefi;4"r 2-6e COUNTY OF HARTFORD `" Personally appeared, MATTHEW B. GALLIGAN, signer and sealer of the foregoing ihsq t, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such Town Manager, and tFl, .rr e apt at3d. deed ofss municipality, before me. r� 1 t,e tary Public y Commission Expires: S 31(GS Commissioner of the Superior Court r r VOL. 1522PAGE 204 SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS, LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD HEDGEROW EASEMENT The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/143 0/17LOTSUBDIV/1 43 0_4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers - Planners Surveyors - GIS 860 . 291 • 8755 165 south satellite road - south windsor• connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 220% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said ma is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town f p o o South Windsor. Said Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: Westerly side of Vintage Lane: Beginning at a point in the stone wall, said point being a monument to be set, said point being further described as being 81.92 feet on a bearing of N87° 38' 36"E of an iron pin set;thence, S33° 03' 10"W through Lot 10,a distance of 18.40 feet to a monument to be set;thence,N87° 5 F 01"E through Lot 10,a distance of 231.00 feet to a point;thence,NO1'2F 5TV along Vintage Lane, a distance of 15.84 feet to a point;thence, S87' 38'36'W along a stone wall and property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 220.61 feet to a monument to be set, said monument also being the point and place of beginning. Easterly side: Beginning at a point in the northeasterly corner of the easement, said mint being further described by an iron pin set in the stone wall;thence, S88° 54'25"W along a stone wall and property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 531.03 feet to an iron pin set;thence, S88°44' 06"W along said stone wall and property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 255.26 feet to an iron pin set;thence, S85° 51'47"W along said stone wall and property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 76.05 feet to an iron pin set;thence, S88° 55'56"W along said stone wall and property now or formerly of said Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 80.41 feet to an iron pin set; thence, S87° 38'36"W along said stone wall and property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 98.65 feet to a point;thence, SOl°21' 57"E,a distance of 16.16 feet to a point;thence, N87° 5l'O1"E through Lot 11, a distance of 178.97 feet to a monument to be set;thence,N88° 04' 33"E through Lot 11, Lot 13,and Lot 14,partly by each, in all a distance of 331.29 feet to a monument to be set;thence,N88°54'25"E through Lot 14, Lot 15,and Lot 17,partly by each, in all a distance of 531.42 feet to a monument to be set;thence,NO2° 45' 18"W along the westerly street line of Barber Hill Road, a distance of 15.01 feet to an iron pin set, said iron pia set being the point and place of beginning. REC IVED FOR RECORD- DATE U TIME.M. TOWN CLERK, SOUTIy WINgqSOR,CT �,Si3-64 VOL. 1522PAGE 193 08 695 CONSERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT J� THIS AGREEMENT made this Ay of December 2002, by and between VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, having its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTOR", and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTEE"; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Grantor is the owner of real property, hereinafter described, situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, westerly of Barber Hill Road, which Grantee, acting through its Inland Wetlands Agency, and/or Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Town Council, has determined would be in the public interest to retain, maintain and conserve in its natural state; and WHEREAS, the Grantee has determined that the maintenance and conservation of the said property of the Grantor can best be accomplished by the securing by Grantee of a conservation easement over, across, and upon the said property of Grantor; and WHEREAS, the Grantor is willing, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, to grant to said Grantee the easement and covenants as hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for its maintenance and conservation. NOW THEREFORE, said Grantor does hereby give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the right, privilege and authority as a Conservation Easement Agreement perpetually to preserve, protect, limit, conserve and maintain the land hereinafter described in its present natural condition. All covenants contained herein are deemed to run with the land. Said premises subject to this Conservation Easement Agreement, hereinafter called the "CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA" are described on Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Said CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA is being set aside to maintain the property in its present natural and open condition to fulfill its present historic, scenic, vegetative, wildlife and/or hydrological functions; to protect in perpetuity significant natural features of the property; and to minimize the environmental impact of activities associated with land development within the Town of South Windsor. The grant of this easement does not in any way grant to the public the right to enter upon said CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA for any purpose whatsoever unless stated specifically in this Conservation Easement Agreement. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATES LOCAL$ ______No. �bffcka-k- � , Ik-'Nn�-- TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR VOL. 15 2 2 PAGE 194 COVENANTS Grantor covenants and agrees to prohibit and refrain from the following activities under, over, or upon the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA: I. No buildings, camping accommodations, play equipment or vehicles of any type, or mobile homes shall be placed or erected in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. Fences are prohibited unless approved through EXCEPTIONS procedure, as described below. 2. No signs, billboards or other such advertising materials or structures of any kind or nature will be placed or erected upon, below or above the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 3. The topography of the landscape of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA shall be maintained in its present condition, and no topographic changes shall be made. Topographic changes shall include, without exclusion, cutting of trees (except as may be required by good tree husbandry and maintenance after receiving written approval of the Grantee), filling, excavating, dredging, mining or drilling, removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rocks, or minerals, alteration of natural or existing watercourses or drainage, or the construction and installation of roads, driveways or utilities. 4. There shall be no use of pesticides, poisons, biocides or fertilizers, draining of wetlands, burning or disturbance or change in the natural habitat of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 5. There shall be no manipulation or alteration of natural watercourses, lakeshores, marshes or other water bodies, nor shall any uses or activities in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA be permitted which could be detrimental to water purity or to any vegetative, wildlife or hydrological function. 6. There shall be no operation of vehicles, snowmobiles, dune buggies, motorcycles, mini- bikes, go-carts, all-terrain vehicles or any other type of motorized vehicle in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 7. There shall be no dumping, no filling or placing of trash, ashes, leaves, waste, rubbish, garbage or junk in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. In the event that such materials are placed in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA, the Grantor, upon notice from the Grantee, will remove said materials within 30 days of such notice. 8. There shall be no storage or placement of any equipment, natural or man-made materials or substances in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 2 VOL. 15 2 2 PAGE 195 The Grantee, or its successors or assigns, does not waive or forfeit the right to take action as may be necessary or required in order to ensure compliance with said covenants and/or the purposes for which this Conservation Easement was granted. It is the responsibility of the property owner to be fully aware of all the conditions contained in the Conservation Easement Agreement as expressed herein. The Town of South Windsor will vigorously enforce the conditions established herein. EXCEPTIONS The Grantor with the written consent of the Grantee, acting by and through the Inland/Wetlands Agency or the Planning and Zoning Commission or the South Windsor Town Council, may enter upon the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA to conduct the following activities: 1. Removal of debris, dead trees or brush for the purpose of promoting safety; 2. Pruning and thinning of live trees and brush for the purpose of promoting safety and aesthetic quality, or restoration of natural balance including the removal of exotic species; 3. Planting of trees, shrubs or other vegetation for the purpose of enhancing wildlife or aesthetic quality. Grantee's approval for exempted activities may be withheld only upon a reasonable determination by the Grantee that the action as proposed would be inconsistent with the purpose of this Conservation Easement Agreement. Consideration shall be given to the manner in which such activity is to be undertaken to ensure there is no detrimental impact to the natural character of the land. In addition, the wildlife value of brush and dead trees to be removed shall be considered and weighed against the purpose of the request. The above procedure shall not abrogate the requirement to acquire any permits required by local, state or federal law. Before commencement of any site work in the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA, the Grantor shall mark the boundaries of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA with wooden stakes. Such stakes shall be located at the endpoints of the boundary and at each change of boundary direction. The endpoints of the boundary shall be permanently marked with merestones. ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT Acceptance of this Conservation Easement Agreement by the Grantee shall be evidenced by an affirmative vote of the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission or the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency or the South Windsor Town Council in accordance with the Town's Conservation Easement Ordinance, which is Section 164 of the South Windsor Code of Ordinances. 3 VOL. 15 2 2 PAGE 19 6 LE IITATION ON RIGHT TO AMEND If circumstances arise under which an amendment to or modification of this Conservation Easement Agreement would be appropriate, Grantor and Grantee may jointly amend this Agreement by following the procedure outlined in the Town's Conservation Easement Ordinance, which is Section 164 of the South Windsor Code of Ordinances. RELEASE OF EASEMENT If said CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA, or any part thereof, shall be taken by condemnation, or release of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA has been requested, then the procedures outlined in the Town's Conservation Easement Ordinance, which is Section 164 of the South Windsor Code of Ordinances must be followed. IDENTIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA The Grantor further covenants and agrees as follows: 1. The Grantor shall cause to be installed and maintained, merestones identifying the boundaries of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 2. The Grantor hereby grants the Grantee the right to access the property for the purpose of maintaining markers identifying the boundaries of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA. 3. The Grantor hereby grants the Grantee, upon reasonable notice, the right to have a representative of the Town inspect the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA to determine if the Grantor, its successors and assigns, are complying with the covenants and purposes of this Agreement. 4. The Grantee may enforce this Agreement by proceeding in law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to require the restoration of the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA to the condition at the time of this Agreement. Any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Agreement against any violator including without limitation, costs of suit and attorney's fees, shall be borne by the violator. FINDING OF VIOLATION 1. If the Grantor is found by the Grantee, or its successor to have violated the terms of this Easement or Agreement, the Grantor agrees, among other things, to cease and desist from any activity violating the terms of this Conservation Easement Agreement, and further agrees to restore the CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREAS as closely as possible to their natural state. Such restoration shall include but is not limited to: 4 VOL. 1522PAGE 197 a) replanting with trees, shrubs or other appropriate vegetation acceptable to the Grantee; b) removal of any debris, trash, garbage, ashes, waste, rubbish, silt, unsightly or offensive material; c) removal of any unauthorized buildings, signs, billboards or other advertising, or other structures on or above ground; d) emplacement and maintenance of erosion controls; e) Restoration shall be at the expense of Grantor and in accordance with plans developed by a qualified professional such as a landscape architect and/or professional engineer, and approved by the Grantee or its successor. 2. If the Grantor is found to have violated a Conservation Easement Agreement, the Grantee, or its successor, may exercise its discretion in accordance with the Town's Conservation Easement Ordinance, which is Section 164 of the South Windsor Code of Ordinances, to levy a daily fine following notification to the Grantor of a Finding of Violation, and proceeding until full restoration has been achieved and certified by the appropriate Town Agency. The foregoing Conservation Easement Agreement shall be permanent and binding upon the Grantor and his/her heirs, successors and assigns, except as herein before set forth, and inure to the benefit of Grantee, its successors and assigns. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-granted rights, privilege or authority unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use and behoof. 5 voL. 1522PAGE 19 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set or caused to be set his hand and seal the day and year first aforementioned. Signed, Sealed and Delivered In the Presence of: GRANTOR: VINTAGE HILLS, LLC By n Jacq ger/Member 9 9�ocnnne. ta01:�v GRANTEE: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR By W4 L.S. Matthew B. Galligan, Town Man ger i STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss. South Windsor December 2002 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, Vintage Hills, LLC, acting herein by John Jacques, its manager/member duly authorized, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed before me. arold R. Cummings Commissioner of the Superior Court 6 voi. 15 2 2 PAGE 199 STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ) ss. South Windsor -Dwumber , 264t COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, MATTHEW B. GALLIGAN, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such Town Manager, before me. -'A raf t, No Public f My Commission Expires: Commissioner of the Superior Court 9 O 4: 7 VOL. 1522PAGE 2 O 0 SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS, LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD CONSERVATION EASEMENT The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/1430/17LOTSUBDIV/1430_4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers • Planners - Surveyors • GIS 860 - 291 • 8755 165 south satellite road • south windsor • connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 20% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said map is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the northwest corner of the property herein described, said point being further described as an iron pin;thence S11°52' 29"E along property now or formerly of Roxanne M. &Robert J. Mongeon, a distance of 470.32 feet to an iron pin;thcuce, SOO'20' OVE along property now or formerly of Roxanne M. &Robert J. Mongeon, a distance 48.25 feet to a monument to be set;thence, S56° 54'45"W through Lot 8,a distance of 307.50 feet to a monument to be set,thence,N57° 52' 00"E through said Lot 8, a distance of 55.22 feet to a monument to be set; thence,N05° 05' 06"E through said Lot 8,a distance of 65.10 feet to a monim.nit to be set;thence N15°44' 22"W through said Lot 8, a distance of 184.96 feet to a monument to`be set;thence,N47° 09' 34"W through Lot 8 and Lot 9,partly by each, in all a distance of 342.53 feet to a monument to be set;thence,N13° 59' 33"W through Lot 9 and Lot 10,partly by each, in all a distance of 121.11 feet to a monument to be set;thence,N33°03' 09"E through Lot 10,a distance of 72.27 feet to a monument to be set;thence, S87° 38'36"W along a stone wall and along property now or formerly of Theresa Gedrim, a distance of 81.92 feet to an iron pin;thence, S84° 09'45"W along a stone wall and property now or formerly of Anita C.Roy, a distance of 34.35 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the point and place of beginning. RECEIVED FOR RECOR�: DATE 4 03 TIMES=M. `OWN CLERK, SOUTH WIND OR,TT n 55�5 � VOL. 1518 PAGE 14 t STREET TREE EASEMENT 08360 THIS AGREEMENT made this day of December 2002, by and between VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, having its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTOR", and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTEE"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is the owner of real property, hereinafter described, situated on westerly side of Barber Hill Road in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that it would be in the public interest to retain a Street Tree Easement on a portion of the premises of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that the landscaping of said property can best be accomplished by the securing by the GRANTEE of a street tree easement over, across and upon the said property of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is willing, in consideration of the need to provide for the street tree easement, to grant to the said GRANTEE, the easement hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for the continuation of said premises as a street tree easement; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR intends to convey the property described herein to certain purchasers subject to this street tree easement and by granting said street tree easement to the GRANTEE shall not change the character of private ownership of said property and the public shall have no right to enter upon same. NOW, THEREFORE, the said GRANTOR does hereby give, grant, bargain and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever the right, privilege and authority as a street tree easement and restriction, to plant and perpetually preserve, street trees in their present condition a twenty foot (20') wide tree belt along each side of the streets as shown on Schedule A attached hereto. THE GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS FURTHER COVENANT AND AGREE: 1. To maintain said tree belt; and 2. To prohibit and refrain from the following operations, unless prior written consent is obtained from the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agency or successor, on the premises conveyed herein: a. the construction or placing of buildings, structures, roads, signs or fence; CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATES LOCAL$ No. TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR VOL. 1518 PAGE b. the dumping or placing of soil, leaves and yard wastes, etc., or other substances or materials as landfill or dumping or placing of trash, ashes, waste, rubbish,junk, garbage or unsightly or offensive materials; c. the excavation, dredging or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other mineral substance; d. the removal or destruction of street trees. The GRANTOR reserves unto itself, its successors, and assigns the right to continue to use the property subject to said Street Tree Easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the terms hereof. The grant of the Street Tree Easement shall in no way grant anyone other than the parties hereto the right to enter upon the property subject to the easement. The GRANTEE, or its lawful agents, may enter the property for the purpose of inspection and ensuring that the terms hereof are properly enforced. The foregoing Street Tree Easement shall be permanent and shall be binding upon the GRANTOR and its successors and assigns, and shall insure to the benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights, privileges or authority unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, VINTAGE HILLS, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of December 2002. Signed, Sealed and Delivered In the Presence of: GRANTOR: VINTAGE HILLS, LLC By ohn Jacque a /Member GRANTEE: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR By l _ L.S. atthew B. Galligan, Town NKnager VOL. PAGE 1 � STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss. South Windsor December 2002 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, VINTAGE HILLS, LLC, acting herein by JOHN JACQUES, its Manager/Member, duly authorized, signer and sealer of the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed, and the free act and deed of a sole company, before me. Harold R. Cummings Commissioner of the Superior Court STATE OF CONNECTICUT) A-U6 Q 71 ss. South Windsor Dgaer6Wr ,062'' COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) _,it3lfrr,J. n sealer of the foregoing "tr� Personally appeared, MATTHEW B. GALLIGAN, signer a d g g I, milt, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such Town Manager, and the free acf aq ` deed of stele municipality, before me. N ary Public ' r ' Dy Commission Expires: 3 S Commissioner of the Superior Court VOL. 1518 PAGE 17 SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS, LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD STREET TREE EASEMENT The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/143 0/17LOTSUBDIV/143 0—4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers Planners • Surveyors • GIS 860 •�291 • 8755 165 south satellite road • south windsor connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 20% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said map is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. RE EIV D FOR RECORD: D TE a 1 b TIME 9'457lq M. l -u- 0 Ld"L-� - OWN CLERK, SOUTH WINDS OW, CT . VOL, PAGE �- DRAINAGE EASEMENT 08359 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that VINTAGE HILLS,L.L.C. a Connecticut Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR($1.00) and other valuable considerations, received to its full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use, alter, repair, replace, and remove storm water or storm drainage systems and appurtenances thereto, in, through, upon and over certain pieces or parcels of land located westerly of Barber Hill Road and more particularly described on a map or plan as referenced on Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated by reference, which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office in said Town of South Windsor, to which reference may be had. Said piece is more particularly described as"Drainage Easement in Favor of Town of South Windsor" as shown on Schedule A. Within said parcel(s) as described on Schedule A, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees and bushes as may be convenient or necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with men and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction of said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm drainage systems and to excavate and fill, and, if necessary, to alter existing water courses or form embankments over said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm sewer drainage systems. The Grantor herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures on said easements or rights-of-way and shall not plant or allow to be planted or grown any trees thereon or perform any work thereon within said easements or rights-of-way which may endanger or interfere with said line, pipe or drainage systems. The Grantor herein for itself, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to itself, its successors and assigns, to continue to use the land within which the aforsesaid easements or rights-of-way have been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purpose for which these easements or rights-of-way are granted. The Grantee herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to restore and maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use upon the completion of any maintenance, operation, construction, replacement or repair work in said easement or right-of-way areas. The Grantee agrees to hold the Grantor, hers/his/theirs and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the construction and/or maintenance and repair of said sewer line. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATE$ -LOCAL$ No. TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR r- r VOL. 1518 pAGE 12 r SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS, LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD DRAINAGE EASEMENT The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/1430/17LOTSUBDIWI430_4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers Planners • Surveyors - GIS 860 . 291 - 8755 165 south satellite road • south windsor Connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 20% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said map is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point being the northwest corner of Lot 2; thence, N87° 14'42"E along Vintage Lane, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence, S020 45' 18"E through Lot 2, a distance of 235.00 feet to a point; thence, S870 14'42"W along property to be deeded as Open Space, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; thence, NO2° 45' 18"W through Lot 3, a distance of 235.00 feet to a point; thence, N870 14'42"E along Vintage Lane, a distance of 10.00 feet to a point, said point being the point and place of beginning. VOL. 1518 PAGE 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this 131h day of December 2002. Signed, Sealed and Delivered G TOR: VINT E HILLS, LLC In the Presence of By o Jac s, a ger/Member C? D {. i(Ja STATE OF CONNECTICUT} } ss. South Windsor COUNTY OF HARTFORD } On this 13u'day of December 2002, before me, Harold R. Cummings, the undersigned officer, personally appeared John Jacques, Manager/Member of Vintage Hills, LLC, known to me(or satisfactorily proved)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In witness whereof, I hereunto set m hand. Haro d R. Cummings Commissioner of the Su rior Court TOWN HALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer Date: Approved by Town Manager Date: d 7 C Received for Record AUG 2 7 2003 Time: 945 A V 151 1W PAGE 11 (Town Clerk) MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Date: 4/13/04 O)L a I RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision ( P-) Phase 1 and 2 Bond Reductions The Engineering Division has reviewed the request to reduce the bond for Phase 1 of the Vintage Hills subdivision to the maintenance level. The work in Phase I is substantially complete and therefore we recommend that the bond amount be reduced to the maintenance level of $35,540 for phase 1 of the project. Please call me if you have any questions. We have also reviewed the request to reduce the bond for Phase 2 of the Vintage Hills Subdivision. Based on the work completed to date we recommend that the bond for Phase 2 be reduced to $119,700. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north ------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ---------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Good condition; grass cover > 75% - 2.97 (61) Impervious Areas - Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .10 (98) - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 2 (48) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 5.07 --------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 5.07 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 57* ------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north ------------------------------------ Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------ Sheet 3.2 120 .036 g 0.334 Shallow Concent'd 200 .036 u 0.016 Shallow Concent'd 530 .04 u 0.046 Time of Concentration = 0.40* Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north Data: Drainage Area 5.07 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 57 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number ► 1 ► 2 l 3 1 4 1 5 1 -1------1------1------i------1------I i Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 I 25 I 50 ► 100 l i I I i I I I l 24-Hr Rainfall (in) l 3.2 l 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 ► 6.9 l I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 10.47 1 0.32 l 0.27 i 0.24 l 0.22 I 1 Runoff (in) 10.31 l 0.95 ( 1.38 1 1.80 12.25 I I I i I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.358 10.568 10.607 10.624 10.637 I 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I i I Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 i 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I' I i----------------------I------I------1------I------I------1 Peak Discharge (cfs) l 1 I 3 i 4 1 6 1 7 I * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH Subarea : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ----------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Residential districts Avg % impery (by average lot size) 1 acre 20 - 17.1(68) 3.71(79) 1.9(84) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 17.1 3.71 1.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 22.71 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 71* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .013 F 0.283 Shallow Concent'd 100 .013 U 0.015 Open Channel 800 2 0.111 Time of Concentration = 0.41* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH Data: Drainage Area 22.71 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 71 * Time of Concentration: 0.41 * Hours Rainfall Type I III Pond and Swamp Area NONE ( Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5 1 6 1 {----------------------I------i------ ------►------{------I------I Frequency (yrs) ( 2 i 10 I 25 ( 50 1 100 ( 1 1 I I I I f I I I l 24-Hr Rainfall (in) ( 3.2 I 4.7 ► 5.5 { 6.2 I 6.9 { 1.50 1 i i I I I l I I Ia/P Ratio ( 0.26 ( 0.17 ( 0.15 1 0.13 ( 0.12 10.54 I ( Used 10.26 10.17 { 0.15 10.13 1 0.12 10.50 l I i I I I I I I Runoff (in) 10.88 ( 1.89 ( 2.50 ( 3.06 1 3.64 10.10 I ( I I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.611 10.655 10.669 ►0.678 {0.685 10.316 { { (cfs/acre/in) ( Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 ( 1.00 11.00 ( 1.00 ( 1.00 i 1.00 I ( 0.0% Ponds Used I (----------------------i------1------{------1------I------(------I l Peak Discharge (cfs) I 12 { 28 { 38 { 47 { 57 1 1 I * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C Reservoir Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrogr-aphs by Intelisolve Reservoir No. 1 - DETENT BASIN Pond Data Bottom LxW = 380.0 x 40.0 It Side slope = 3.0:1 Bottom elev. = 308.00 ft Depth = 5.00 It Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sgft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(tuft) 0.00 308.00 15,200 0 0 0_25 308.25 17,756 3,879 3,879 0.50 308.50 20,384 4,038 7,917 0.75 308.75 - 23,084 4,197 12,114 1.00 309.00 25,856 4,358 16,472 1.25 309.25 28,700 4,520 20,992 1.50 309.50 31,616 4,683 25,675 1.75 309.75 34,604 4,848 30,523 2.00 310.00 37,664 5,013 35,E 2.25 310.25 40,796 5,179 40,715 2.50 31030 44,000 5,347 46,062 2.75 310.75 47,276 5,516 51,578 3.00 311.00 50,624 5,686 57,264 3.25 311.25 54,044 5,857 63,121 3.50 311.50 57,536 6,029 69,149 3.75 311.75 61,100 6,202 75,352 4.00 312.00 64,736 6,376 81,728 4.25 312.25 68,444 6,552 88,280 4.50 312.50 72,224 6,729 95,008 4.75 312.75 76,076 6,906 101,915 5.00 313.00 80,000 7,085 109,000 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] IC] [D] Rise in = 30.0 12.0 24.0 0.0 Crest Len ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span in = 30.0 12.0 24.0 0.0 Crest El.ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 1 1 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.It = 308.30 308.30 309.50 0.00 Weir Type = - - - - Length ft = 60.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope% = 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.00 N Value = .013 .013 .013 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.00 MuttlStage = n/a Yes Yes No Exffltration Rate = 0.00 in/hr/sgft Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total ft cuft It cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cis cfs cfs 0.00 0 308.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.25 3,879 308.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.50 7,917 308.50 0.17 0.14 0.00 - - -. - - - 0.14 0.75 12,114 308.75 0.72 0.66 0.00 - - - - - - 0.66 1.00 16,472 309.00 1.47 1.47 0.00 - - - - - - 1.47 1.25 20,992 309.25 2.30 2.30 0.00 - - - - - - 2.30 1.50 25,675 309.50 2.96 2.83 0.00 - - - - - - 2.83 1.75 30,523 309.75 3.67 3.22 0.42 - - - - - - 3-6 2.00 35,536 310.00 5.13 3.36 1.53 - - - - - - 4.89 2.25 40,715 310.25 6.72 3.45 3.27 - - - - - - 6.72 2.50 46,062 310.50 9.16 3.39 5.62 - - - - - - 9.00 2.75 51,578 310.75 11.42 3.31 8.02 - - - - - - 11.33 300 57,264 311.00 13.49 3.16 10.33 - - - - - - 13.49 3.25 63,121 311.25 14.86 3.14 11.70 - - - - - - 14.84 3.50 69,149 311.50 15.58 3.12 12.46 - - - - - - 15.58 3.75 75,352 311.75 17.42 3.48 13.94 - - - - - - 17.42 4.00 81,728 312.00 19.09 3.82 15.27 - - - - - - 19.08 4.25 88,280 312.25 20.61 4.12 16.49 - - - - - - 20.61 - 4.50 95,008 312.50 22.04 4.41 17.63 - - - - - - 22.04 4.75 101,915 312.75 23.37 4.67 18.70 - - - - - - 23.37 5.00 109,000 313.00 24.64 4.93 1931 - - - - - - 24.64 APPENDIX D Hydrograph Summary Report Page Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Ti ne to Volume Inflow Maximum Maxkrnm Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cn) (gin) (min) (calf) (ft) (curt) 1 SCS Runoff 12.22 6 744 70,294 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 2.94 6 792 65,572 1 309.54 26,456 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 2 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by intellsoNe Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 12.22 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 3.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=70,294 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time --Outflow (hrs cfs) 12.00 3.63 12.10 6.68 12.20 9.97 12.30 12.08 12.40 12.22<< 12.50 11.33 12.60 9.59 12.70 7.40 12.80 5.54 12.90 4.43 13.00 3.66 13.10 3.16 ...End Hyd. No. 1 - SCS Runoff- 2 Yr- Qp = 12.22 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN I 15 I I � � � I I 10 a 5 I I 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report page Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.94 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval' = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 309.54 ft Max. Storage = 26,456 cuft storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume 65,572 cutt Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CIv A CIv B CIv C CIv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfll Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.40 12.22<< 308.90 1.12 1.12 ---- ----- ---- - --- -- --- 1.12 12.50 11.33 309.11 1.88 1.83 ----- --- --_ ----- __- __- -- 1.83 12.60 9.59 309.28 2.38 2.35 - --- --__ -_ ___ _-- _--- 2.35 12.70 7.40 309.39 2.63 2.63 ----- --- ----- -- --- -- ---- 2.63 12.80 5.54 309.47 2.96 2.75 ---- -- --- ____ -_ _-_ -__-- 2.75 12.90 4.43 309.51 2.96 2.85 0.00 -- ----- --- ---- --- ---- 2.85 13.00 3.66 309.53 2.96 2.90 0.01 - ----- ---- -~-- ----- ----- 2.91 13.10 3.16 309.54 2.96 2.92 0.01 ----- ----- -- --- ---- ---- 2.94 13.20 2.87 309.54<< 2.96 2.92 0.02 ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 2.94<< 13.30 2.67 309.54 2.96 2.92 0.01 ----- --- --- ----- ---- ---- 2.93 13.40 2.52 309.53 2.96 2.91 0.01 ---- ----- --- -- --~- --- 2.92 13.50 2.41 309.52 2.96 2.89 0.00 ---- -- ----- ---- -- -- 2.89. 13.60 2.32 309.51 2.96 2.86 0.00 ---- -- ----- ---- --- -- 2.87 13.70 2.25 309.50 2.96 2.84 0.00 -- ---- ----- ----- --_ ----- 2.84 13.80 2.18 309.49 2.96 2.81 ----- ----- --- ----- --- - --- 2.81 13.90 2.11 309.48 2.96 2.78 ----- --- ----- ----- -- - -- 2.78 14.00 2.03 309.47 2.96 2.74 ----- -- --- -- ---- -- --- 2.74 14.10 1.96 309.45 2.96 2.71 -- ---- ----- ----- ---- ~-_ -- 2.71 14.20 1.89 309.44 2.80 2.68 ---- - -- ----- - ---- -- 2.68 14.30 1.83 309.42 2.67 2.66 -_ -_ _____ _-- __-- -_--- ---- 2.66 14.40 1.78 309.40 2.65 2.65 - --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- 2.65 14.50 1.74 309.39 2.63 2.63 - --- - ----- ---- --- -- 2.63 14.60 1.70 309.37 2.61 2.60 - -- ----- -- -- ---- -- 2.60 14.70 1.66 309.35 2.61 2.55 -- ---- -- --- ---- ---- -- 2.55 14.80 1.63 309.34 2.61 2.51 ----- ---- -- --- ---_ ___ ____ 2.51 14.90 1.59 309.32 2.61 2.46 ---- -__ _- _- ___-- _- _- 2.46 15.00 1.55 309.30 2.61 2.41 --- ---- ----- -__ _____ -_ 2.41 15.10 1.51 309.29 2.47 2.37 -- ----_ -- -_ _____ _- -_ 2.37 15.20 1.48 309.27 2.34 2.34 - - ---- - ----- -- -- 2.34 15.30 1.44 309.25 2.31 2.31 -- -- ----- --- ---- ----- ----- 2.31 15.40 1.40 309.24 2.29 2.26 ---- ----_ ---- ---- ----- ----- __- 2.26-- 15.50 1.36 309.22 2.28 2.20 ----- ----- ----- - -- ----- --- 2.20 15.60 1.32 309.20 2.28 2.13 -- -- ----- -- ----- ----- -- 2.13 15.70 1.28 309.19 2.16 2.07 ----- ----- --- ----- -- ----- -- 2.07 15.80 1.24 309.17 2.03 2.03 - --- 2.03 15.90 1.20 309.16 2.00 2.00 - -- - ----- -- ----- -- 2.00 16.00 1.16 309.14 1.99 1.95 -- ---- ----- -- - ----- -- 1.95 16.10 1.11 309.12 1.98 1.88 - ----_ ___ _____ _____ ____ _- 1.88 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EAl Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.20 1.08 309.11 1.85 1.81 ---- -- -- -~ ----- 1.81 16.30 1.04 309.09 1.76 1.76 ---- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- -- 1.76 16.40 1.02 309.08 1.73 1.73 -- ---- - -- - - - 1.73 16.50 0.99 309.07 1.72 1.68 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- - ----- 1.68 16.60 0.97 309.05 1.71 1.63 ----- --- --- _- _____ -- -- 1.63 16.70 0.95 309.04 1.64 1.58 ---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ----- 1.58 16.80 0.94 309.03 1.54 1.52 ----- ----- --- --' ---' 1.52 16.90 0.92 309.02 1.50 1.50 ---- ----- - -- ----- -- 1.50 17.00 0.90 309.01 1.48 1.48 ---- ----- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- 1.48 17.10 0.88 308.99 1.47 1.44 ---- -- ---- ---- '-'- -" -'- 1.44 17.20 0.86 308.98 1.47 1.39 --- - --- ____ __--- 1.39 17.30 0.84 308.97 1.44 1.35 1.35 17.40 0.83 308.96 1.36 1.31 ----- ----- ----- -~ -~ ---- - 1.31 17.50 0.81 308.95 1.28 1.28 - - ---- _____ -_ _____ __- 1.28 17.60 0.79 308.94 1.26 1.25 1.25 17.70 0.77 308.93 1.25 1.22 -- ---- -_ _____ _____ -- ---- 1.22 17.80 0.75 308.92 1.24 1.19 -- ----- -- --- ---- 1.19 17.90 0.73 308.91 1.19 1.16 --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- --_ 1.16 18.00 0.71 308.91 1.13 1.12 -- -- -- -- ----- ----- -- 1.12 18.10 0.69 308.90 1.09 1.09 ---- ----- ---- - ---- ----- ----- 1.09 18.20 0.68 308.89 1.08 1.07 ----- ---- -_-- ____- --- ----- -- 1.07 18.30 0.66 308.88 1.06 1.05 ----- ---- --- ---- -- ----- ---- 1.05 18.40 0.65 308.87 1.05 1.03 ----- ---- -- --- ----- -- ----- 1.03 18.50 0.64 308.87 1.05 1.00 - ----- -- ----- --- ----- ----- 1.00 18.60 0.64 308.86 1.05 0.97. - ----- -- ----- ---- -_- -- 0.97 18.70 0.63 308.85 1.05 0.94 -- ----- ---- __� _- __-- 0.94 18.80 0.62 308.85 1.02 0.92 --- -- -_ _~ _--- --- - 0.92 18.90 0.62 308.84 0.98 0.91 ---- - -- -- ----- ---- --- 0.91 19.00 0.61 308.83 0.94 0.90 - -- --- -- ---- --- --- 0.90 19.10 0.61 308.83 0.91 0.89 - ---- - ----- ----- --- -- 0.89 19.20 0.60 308.82 0.89 0.88 - -- -- ----- ----- ----- 0.88 19.30 0.60 308.82 0.88 0.86 ----- -- ----- -~ ----- -" -"" 0.86 19.40 0.59 308.81 0.88 0.85 --- --- --- ----- -- ---- ----- 0.85 19.50 0.59 308.81 0.88 0.83 - ---- - ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.83 19.60 0.58 308.80 0.88 0.82 ---- ---- ----- _� ____ _- -- 0.82 19.70 0.57 308.80 0.85 0.80 ---- - ---- ----- ----- ----- 0.80 19.80 0.57 308.79 0.83 0.79 ---- ---- -- --- -- --- -- 0.79 19.90 0.56 308.79 0.80 0.77 ----- -- - ---- ----- ----- --- 0.77 20.00 0.56 308.78 0.78 0.76 ----- --- -- - --_ ----- -- 0.76 20.10 0.55 308.78 0.75 0.74 -- ----- -- - -~ ---- -__ 0.74 ...End ---+ - — Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir - 2 Yr -Op = 2.94 efs - j TT 1 I � I ---- ------ i 0 0.00 4.08 8.16 12.24 16.32 20.40 24.48 28.56 32.64 36.72 40.80 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 I _. Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maxinwm Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (rt) (curt) 1 SCS Runoff 28.43 6 738 151.497 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 12.31 6 768 146,774 1 310.84 53,684 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 10 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report page 1 Hydrattow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 28.43 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 4.70 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=151,497 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time --Outflow (hrs cfs) 12.00 11.14 12.10 17.97 12.20 24.80 12.30 28.43<< 12.40 27.65 12.50 24.80 12.60 20.39 12.70 15.29 12.80 11.21 12.90 8.86 13.00 7.25 ...End Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff- 10 Yr - Qp = 28.43 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 30 1 i 25 20 i f i - I 10 - - i { i 5 --- i 0 i 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 i Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 i Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intel'isobe Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.31 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 310.84 ft Max. Storage = 53,684 cult Storage Indic d method used. outflow hydrograph volume=146,774 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EAU Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs efs efs cfs cfs cfs efs 12.30 28.43<< 309.81 4.02 3.24 0.63 - ---- -- -'- 3.87 12.40 27.65 310.21 6.72 3.40 2.97 6•36 12.50 24.80 310.52 9.16 3.43 5.68 -- ----- --- --- ---' 9.11 12.60 20.39 310.73 11.09 3.36 7.68 --- ----- -- - --- ----- 11.03 12.70 15.29 310.83 12.10 3.27 8.83 --- -- -- ----- ----- 12.10 12.80 11.21 310.84<< 12.31 3.25 9.06 -- ----- --- ----- --- ----- 12.31 << 12.90 8.86 310.81 11.89 3.29 8.60 ----- ----- ----- --_ -- 11.89 13.00 7.25 310.75 11.47 3.31 8.07 ----- -- --- -- -- -- 11.37 13.10 6.24 310.68 10.83 3.34 7.35 ---- ---_ ___ _____ -_--- 10.68 13.20 5.62 310.61 10.13 3.37 6.61 --- ----- ---- -- -- --' 9.98 13.30 5.22 310.54 9.44 3.41 5.93 ---- -- ---- ----- ___ 9.33 13.40 4.91 310.48 8.79 3.43 5.31 ----- ----- -- -- -- --- 8.74 13.50 4.68 310.42 8.35 3.42 4.76 ---- -- ----- ---- -- ---- 8.18 13.60 4.49 310.36 7.95 3.40 4.22 ----- ---- ---- - --- 7.62 13.70 4.34 310.31 7.28 3.46 3.71 --- -- -- ---- --- ----' 7.18 13.80 4.19 310.26 6.93 3.44 3.41 - -- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.85 13.90 4.05 310.22 6.72 3.42 2.99 6.41 14.00 3.90 310.18 6.39 3.42 2.74 ---- -- --- ---- ----- 6.16 14.10 3.75 310.14 5.91 3.45 2.43 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- 5.88 14.20 3.61 310.11 5.91 3.38 2.23 --- --- ----- -- ----- --- 5.61 14.30 3.49 310.07 5.52 3.41 1.95 ---- ---- ----- --- --- 5.37 14.40 3.39 310.04 5.36 3.38 1.84 ----- ----- --- - -- 5•22 14.50 3.30 310.01 5.13 3.38 1.60 ----- ---- - ----- -- ----- 4.98 14.60 3.22 309.98 4.83 3.39 1.39 ----- -- ----- ----- --- ----- 4.78 14.70 3.14 309.95 4.75 3.36 1.32 --- -- ____ ___ _____ __� 4.68 14.80 3.07 309.93 4.75 3.30 1.16 ----- ---- ----- -- ----- -- 4.47 14.90 3.00 309.90 4.41 3.34 1.02 ----- ----- -- ----- -- ---- 4•36 15.00 2.92 309.88 4.38 3.30 0.89 ---- ----- - ---- ----- ---- 4.19 15.10 2.85 309.86 4.11 3.28 0.78 ----- - -- ----- - ---- 4.05 15.20 2.77 309.83 4.02 3.28 0.73 ----- --- --- -- ----- --_ 4.01 15. 30 2.70 309 .81 4.02 3.25 0.66 ---- ---- -- _�_ _____ 3.92 15.40 2.62 309.79 4.02 3.21 0.57 _____ _____ --- -�_ _____ _� 3.78 15.50 2.54 309.77 3.95 3.18 0.49 ---- ---- ---- --- ----- ----- 3.67 15.60 2.47 309.75 3.67 3.22 0.42 ----- - ---' ----- -- 3•64 15.70 2.39 309.73 3.67 3.17 0.36 ---- ---- ---- ----- -- ----- 3.52 15.80 2.31 309.71 3.67 3.12 0.30 ----- - - -- ----- ----- 3.42 15.90 2.23 309.69 3.49 3.11 0.25 --- ----- - ----- - ----- 3•36 16.00 2.15 309.67 3.33 3.11 0.20 ----- ---- ---- -- --- -- 3.31 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI Outflow (hrs) efs ft cfs Cfs cfs Cfs Cfs cfs Cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.10 2.07 309.64 3.33 3.08 0.15 -- -- ----- ----- --- -- 3.23 16.20 2.00 309.62 3.33 3.03 0.10 ----- --- ----- -- ---- 3.13 ...End Hyd. No. 2 Reservoir - 10 Yr -Op 2.31 cfs - 15- 0 0.0 3.2 6.4 9.6 12.8 15.9 19.1 22.3 25.5 28.7 31.9 Time (hrs) Hyd. 1 Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maxin um Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow Interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (Cfs) (min) (min) (Curt) (ft) (Cult) 1 SCS Runoff 38.13 6 738 200,245 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 15.98 6 768 195,522 1 311.55 70,422 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 25 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Paw, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 38.13 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 5.50 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=2W,245 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.90 9.68 12.00 15.82 12.10 24.85 12.20 33.71 12.30 38.13<< 12.40 36.71 12.50 32.64 12.60 26.63 12.70 19.80 12.80 14.43 12.90 11.36 ...End Hyd. No. 1 - SCS Runoff- 25 Yr -Op = 38.13 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 40- i i I I 30 I � I a 20 10 i o 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) j / Hyd 1 Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 15.98 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time intervaV = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 311.55 ft Max. Storage = 70,422 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=195,522 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EAU Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.20 33.71 309.92 4.68 3.31 1.13 ---- -- --- --- ----- - 4.43 12.30 38.13<< 310.43 8.35 3.43 4.90 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- 8.33 12.40 36.71 310.87 12.64 3.20 9.23 - -- ---- ----- --- --- 12.44 12.50 32.64 311.20 14.62 3.15 11.46 ----- ----- ____ -_ _- - - 14.62 12.60 26.63 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 -- ---- --- ----- ---- --- 15.21 12.70 19.80 311.53 15.84 3.17 12.67 15.84 12.80 14.43 311.55 << 15.98 3.20 12.78 -- ---- --- ----- ----- ---- 15.98 << 12.90 11.36 311.51 15.65 3.13 12.52 ----- ___ _____ _____ -__ -__ 15.65 13.00 9.28 311.36 15.19 3.10 12.08 ---_ ___ ____ _- ____ ----- 15.19 13.10 7.96 311.34 15.12 3.12 12.01 ---- --- ---- -- ---- ---- 15.12 13.20 7.17 311.22 14.75 3.15 11.60 -- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- 14.75 13.30 6.65 311.11 14.20 3.16 11.02 -- -_ ____ -_ __- ____ 14.17 13.40 6.25 311.00 13.45 3.16 10.29 -- -- ---- -_ _____ ____ 13.45 13.50 5.95 310.89 12.83 3.18 9.40 --- --- ----- -- --- ---- 12.58 13.60 5.71 310.79 11.76 3.28 8.41 ----- ----- -- --- --- ---- 11.70 13.70 5.51 310.70 11.00 3.31 7.52 ---- --- --- ---- ----- --- 10.83 13.80 5.32 310.61 10.16 3.37 6.64 ---- ---- --- -- -- ----- 10.01 13.90 5.13 310.54 9.42 3.41 5.91 -_ _- ___ -__ ___ _____ 9.32 14.00 4.94 310.48 8.77 3.44 5.29 ----- --- ----- ----- -- - 8.72 14.10 4.75 310.41 8.35 3.41 4.76 -- ----- -- --- --- ----- 8.17 14.20 4.57 310.36 7.95 3.40 4.22 ----- --- -- --- --- -- 7.62 14.30 4.41 310.31 7.31 3.46 3.73 - ----- ----- ---- -- - 7.19 14.40 4.28 310.27 6.98 3.44 3.45 -- -- --- ---- ---- ---- 6.88 14.50 4.17 310.22 6.72 3.43 3.00 ---- -- ----- -- -__ __- 6.42 14.80 4.06 310.19 6.49 3.40 2.80 ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 6.21 14.70 3.97 310.15 5.92 3.46 2.45 ----- -- ---- ----- ----- ---- 5.91 14.80 3.87 310.12 5.91 3.41 2.33 ----- ----- ---- -- ----- 5.74 14.90 3.78 310.09 5.70 3.39 2.06 ---- -- ----- ----- ---- ----- 5.45 15.00 3.68 310.06 5.52 3.38 1.93 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- -- 5.31 15.10 3.59 310.03 5.21 3.40 1.76 --- -- ----- ----- ---- ---- 5.16 15.20 3.49 310.00 5.13 3.37 1.56 ----- ----- ---- -- -- -- 4.92 15.30 3.40 309.98 4.81 3.39 1.38 ---- ---- -- ---- --- 4.77 15.40 3.30 309.95 4.75 3.36 1.32 --- -- ----- - ----- 4.68 15.50 3.20 309.93 4.75 3.31 1.19 ----- ---- -- ----- ----- --- 4.50 15.60 3.10 309.91 4.48 3.33 1.05 ---- - --- -- -- 4.38 15.70 3.00 309.88 4.38 3.31 0.92 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- 4.23 15.80 2.90 309.86 4.20 3.28 0.81 ----- ----- --- ---- ----- --_- 4.09 15.90 2.80 309.84 4.02 3.27 0.74 ---- ----- --- ----- -- ----- 4.01 Continues on next page... ----------------- ----------- i Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir - 25 Yr - Op = 15.98 cfs - 40 i I i I _ � I Cy 20 - -- ----- - --- --- 10 --- --- I 0 0.0 3.1 6.2 9.4 12.5 15.6 18.7 21.8 25.0 28.1 31.2 Time (hrs) ! Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Page Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Tune to Volume Inflow Maxhynxn Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (fin) (am) (min) (min) (calf) (1t) (CUM 1 SCS Runoff 46.97 6 738 245,019 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 20.09 6 768 240,295 1 312.16 86,003 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 50 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 46.97 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval' = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 6.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=245,019 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs ds) 11.90 12.57 12.00 20.17 12.10 31.20 12.20 41.87 12.30 46.97<< 12.40 44.92 12.50 39.72 12.60 32.24 12.70 23.84 12.80 17.31 12.90 13.60 ...End i Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff- 50 Yr - Op = 46.97 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN I 50 T7 40 - I i I � i 30 II C3 j I 20 i i 10 I i 0 I 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 j Time (hrs) I / Hyd. 1 i Hydrograph Report page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 20.09 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 312.16 ft Max. Storage = 86,003 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=240,295 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A CIv B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.20 41.87 310.38 8.05 3.42 4.34 --- ---- ----- ---- ----- --- 7.76 12.30 46.97 << 310.93 13.08 3.16 9.85 -- --- --- -- -- 13.01 12.40 44.92 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 --- - --- --- -- 15.21 12.50 39.72 311.80 17.74 3.55 14.19 -- - -- -- --- ---- 17.74 12.60 32.24 312.04 19.35 3.87 15.48 ----- --- ---- -- -- -- 19.35 12.70 23.84 312.16 20.05 4.01 16.04 ----- --- -- -- ---- ----- 20.05 12.80 17.31 312.16 << 20.10 4.02 16.07 --- ----- --- -- ----- 20.09<< 12.90 13.60 312.10 19.72 3.94 15.78 -- --_- -- ____ -__ _- 19.72 13.00 11.09 312.00 19.12 3.82 15.29 -- ----- ---- __-_ _-__ _-__ 19.11 13.10 9.50 311.89 18.34 3.67 14.67 -- ---- ---- --- ---- -- 18.34 13.20 8.55 311.76 17.49 3.50 13.99 ----- -- ----- --- ---- ----- 17.49 13.30 7.92 311.63 16.59 3.32 13.27 ----- -- ----- --- --- ---- 16.58 13.40 7.44 311.51 15.66 3.13 12.53 -- -- --- __- -_ _-___ 15.66 13.50 7.07 311.39 15.22 3.09 12.13 ---- -- -- --- --- -- 15.22 13.60 6.78 311.27 14.93 3.13 11.77 -- --- ----- --- - -- 14.90 13.70 6.54 311.15 14.45 3.13 11.18 ----- ---- _____ _____ -__ -- 14.30 13.80 6.32 311.03 13.73 3.16 10.56 ----- -- ---- --- ----- - 13.73 13.90 6.09 310.92 12.98 3.15 9.75 ---- -- -- - - --- 12.91 14.00 5.86 310.82 11.96 3.29 8.68 ---- -- ----- ----- ---- ---- 11.96 14.10 5.63 310.72 11.07 3.35 7.66 ----- ----- --- -- - ----- 11.01 14.20 5.42 310.64 10.33 3.38 6.84 --- -- -- --- ----- 10.22 14.30 5.23 310.57 9.56 3.43 6.07 ----- --- ----_ -__ -__ _-_- 9.50 14.40 5.07 310.50 9.16 3.39 5.61 ---- --- --- --- - --- 9.00 14.50 4.93 310.44 8.35 3.42 4.92 ----- ----- ----- -- ----- --- 8•34 14.60 4.81 310.38 8.10 3.42 4.37 ----- ---- -- --- ----- 7.79 14.70 4.70 310.34 7.72 3.41 4.03 ----- -- --- ---- -- -- 7.44 14.80 4.58 310.29 7.13 3.47 3.59 -- -- ----- -- --- 7.05 14.90 4.47 310.25 6.76 3.45 3.29 -- ---- ---- ---- ----- --- 6.74 15.00 4.36 310.22 6.72 3.41 2.98 - ----- -- -- --- ---- 6.39 15.10 4.24 310.1 8 6.41 3.41 2.75 - -- ----- -- --- ----- 6.17 15.20 4.13 310.15 5.91 3.46 2.45 - - -- -- ----- ----- 5.91 15.30 4.01 310.12 5.91 3.41 2.34 -- -- ----- - ----- 5.75 15.40 3.90 310.09 5.74 3.39 2.08 ----- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- 5.47 15.50 3.78 310.06 5.52 3.39 1.94 ----- -- --- ---- ---- -- 5.33 15.60 3.66 310.04 5.29 3.39 1.80 ----- -- - ----- -- ----- 5.19 ...End i Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir - 50 Yr -Op = 20.09 cfs - 50 u C� i I 10 — — - - --- --- - i I 0 i 0.00 3.03 6.06 9.09 12.12 15.15 18.18 21.21 24.24 27.27 30.30 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Page Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to volume Inflow Max"snKxn Maxarnxn Hydrograph NO. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (Cfs) (min) (gin) (Cuft) (n) lam) 1 SCS Runoff 56.04 6 738 291,345 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 23.50 6 768 286,621 1 312.78 102,636 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 100 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Irdelisolve Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflcw Hydrographs by Intelisclve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 56.04 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 6.90 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=291,345 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs ds) 11.90 15.61 12.00 24.72 12.10 37.78 12.20 50.29 12.30 56.04<< 12.40 53.33 12.50 46.94 12.60 37.94 12.70 27.94 12.80 20.22 12.90 15.86 ..End Hyd. No. 1 - SCS Runoff- 100 Yr- Qp = 56.04 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 60 i 40 I a 3o 20 10 o 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.7 12.1 14.6 17.0 19.4 21.9 24.3 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report Page, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 23.50 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 312.78 ft Max. Storage = 102,636 cult Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=286,621 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExfiI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 37.78 310.23 6.72 3.44 3.09 - -- ----- -- --- ----- 6.52 12.20 50.29 310.81 11.87 3.29 8.58 - -- - -_- ----- ----- 11.87 12.30 56.04<< 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 -- ----- -- --- ---- ---- 15.22 12.40 53.33 311.96 18.83 3.77 15.07 ---- ----- -__ _____ __- ____- 18.83 12.50 46.94 312.37 21.32 4.26 17.05 -- - --~ --_-- ----- 21.32 12.60 37.94 312.64 22.80 4.56 18.24 - -- -- ---- ---- ---- 22.80 12.70 27.94 312.77 23.47 4.69 18.77 ----- ---- ---- - --- 23.46 12.80 20.22 312.78 << 23.51 4.70 18.80 23.50<< 12.90 15.86 312.71 23.15 4.63 18.52 -- - --- __- --_ --- 23.15 13.00 12.91 312.60 22.56 4.51 18.05 ----- ----- ---- --- ---- -"- 22•56 13.10 11.06 312.46 21.83 4.37 17.46 ---- -- ----- ----- ---- --- 21.83 13.20 9.94 312.32 21.00 4.20 16.80 -- ---__ ~__ _-_- --- ---- 21.00 13.30 9.21 312.17 20.12 4.02 16.10 ----- -- ---- ----- --- 20.12 13.40 8.64 312.02 19.21 3.84 15.37 --- ---- ----- --- ---- 19.21 13.50 8.21 311.88 18.27 -3.65 14.62 ----- ----- ___ _~ __-- _---- 18.27 13.60 7.87 311.74 17.33 3.47 13.86 ----- ----- -- --_ ---- ----- 17.33 13.70 7.59 311.60 16.38 3.28 13.10 -- ----- -~ ---- ----- --- 16.38 13.80 7.32 311.48 15.43 3.09 12.34 -- -- ----- --- ----- --- 15.43 13.90 7.06 311.36 15.18 3.11 12.07 ---- ---- --- - ----- -- 15.18 14.00 6.79 311.24 14.82 3.14 11.66 ----- - --__ ____ __--- ----- 14.80 14.10 6.52 311.12 14.27 3.15 11.06 -- -- ----- ----_ ----- -- 14.21 14.20 6.27 311.00 13.53 3.16 10.37 ---- - -- --- -- -- 13.53 14.30 6.05 310.89 12.92 3.16 9.51 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 12.67 14.40 5.87 310.80 11.76 3.30 8.44 --- --- -- --- --- --- 11.74 14.50 5.71 310.71 11.07 3.32 7.60 ---- --- - ----- ---- ---- 10.92 14.60 5.56 310.63 10.33 3.35 6.80 -- - ----- - ----- --- 10.15 14.70 5.43 310.56 9.56 3.40 6.04 ----- --- -- -- ---- 9.45 14.80 5.30 310.49 9.06 3.40 5.53 -- ----- ----- - -~- ---- 8.93 14.90 5.17 310.44 8.35 3.42 4.92 --- ----- -~ -- --- ----- 8.34 15.00 5.03 310.39 8.13 3.41 4.40 - - -- ----- ----- ----- 7.81 15.10 4.90 310.34 7.80 3.40 4.09 - ---- ----- ---- -~ 7.49 15.20 4.77 310.30 7.13 3.48 3.60 ----- -- ----- ----- -- ----- 7.08 15.30 4.63 310.26 6.91 3.44 3.40 - -- ---- ----- ~- ---- 6.84 15.40 4.50 310.23 6.72 3.43 3.01 - - ----- ---- -~- --'- 6.44 15.50 4.36 310.19 6.60 3.39 2.87 ----- --- --- --- -- --_-- 6.26 15.60 4.22 310.16 6.08 3.45 2.55 ----- ----- ---- ----- -- -- 6.00 ...End Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir - 100 Yr - Op = 23.50 efs - I 60 -- 50 --- — i I � i 0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 14.9 17.9 20.9 23.9 26.9 29.9 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 APPENDIX E STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: �acg,Qs - �.-6� �� Sheet No.: 1 Project Number:_1N�o Design By: aft j Description: L'g 3 — , � Check By: u_ cn o w O ri U Q Q cn z _ (n z Jz_ U re Ow W C 0 ^ z L - QD L x O Lj p oa J U � W n W!- t7u �Uz p z = w C Wt5 z p3 O CL O Oar z � Z U � J � m UV Q i F_- Q � QU C g 1 S•S 0.03 0.6% 0.020 0.020 0.0zo io.Z 0,1Ly 0,030 0.0;1 0,0G 2, o D,o2 p o03 o,ot� cg to Iz.S o.ly o,�1 0.085 o,03S 0.oBS N.`� 0. a.o2S o,03� o.lo �,Z 0,0L1 o.ao9 0�6 Cg g.s o,z o.ys o.1z� o.Iz� o, -ss S.3 o. f� 0.030 0,031 Z 7.9 0.13 0,0z 0. 110 C 6� IO.S o.,S o.S2- 6.193 o.198 O.u3 .-+ I.oSO,ly N,5 0.164 CB 5 �.S o,S3 o.Nq 0.2,o D,i,(.o 0,3Jj q I, z o,o 0.03� 0.18 Sy 0.�1 0. It3 o,zoG Cg3 o.yo 0.zg1 0.2_y4 0,-Ko C:\Berry\Gutter Flow SheM.)ls STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: Sheet No.: z Project Number: 1430 Design By: ��E Description: C(�9 — S. -T, Check By: aU. � Q Dryz w - U- w w p a � w U ph ¢ 0 � za U. O Q Z = � z 0 � n=~. � � Q � �ii z � m w O ED�4x 2. � C7 � � � � o ¢ u. - u. m ? ¢ z ¢ v ZV) �- 6( 1 0,01 0;-Jt 0,02-( 0,01( 0.021 6.2- 0,130 ,o3v 0,0�1, OC 2,0 0.6Z 0.003 0,w 66Z1 S 4.oS o.88 o,n 0.0-?0 o.)-0 6,2. 0-'-(31 2,02 0,031 0,10 3.2- 0.6y O.Obt; 0.06y �Q Iq Q,21 O.S°I 0.12H 0,124 0.130 3.8 0.4gN o023 03 0.11 �•S b.o9 O.oz`f 0. 10C CQ I 12•� 0,2S O,S� 0 1�3 0.14� 6, y,� 0,�3� 0,023 0,631 0.1� N.o 0. I�- D.o3°I (.),128 Cg $ g.S o.l 0.49 01011 0.091 10,690 0.010 0.011 0.12 0,02 © /o 0,031 0.1� 0.1� O.pNo D. l(o(o C3�I 1 I O y(a o.s�l 0 zyg o.2`ag p,z88 y,S� 1.3a CABarry\Gutter Flow Sheet.)ls STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: � �9 t - �,e, /��/ Sheet No.: 3 v Project Number: 1430 � �- Design By: Description: ',Z y T4 e7 Check By: � H � z, ao Jw Ow g a x. � p dOzm Zr- �z U� wz a _ D ' o z aa w w wOQQ J � z wz0 pZ 0. r x � � 0 p� CQ 10 II.S 0.. 0,50 0.-g45 6).3 5 0.34S- NS 1,E5- 0.023 0631 0.►8 S,3 O,so o, ll� 0.2�q CQ 18 2 0•NI coo 0.1$q alsl 0,3oo q•N 1,SZ 0.oZ3 0.oll 0,1-' 5-:0 0.45 6. 1 0.3H 0.v 0.1v� 0,m 6,Iro3 s3 0,86y 002s 0.03l 0.111 N.Z 6.2-0 0,038 0. 125 �a Ib Iz.S o.98 o,` -� rj. 1 0.4 0,601 ti, 2,6y CABarry\Gutter Flaw SheelAs STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: ,tL, - /��.� ✓ >�j _ Sheet No.: / V Project Number: /y30 Design By: ILL - Description: C T Check By: LL w o s z 0z w w ~ z �_z =cn ►- � w � Q � � O% W o wo Q Z � Z Lz z Mw � � zw ° . ° ZJ 2 -J O 0 � z Q 0 NV U. _- � rvx¢ Q _ a � CP; 13 ) b,3o O.SO 0,I50 0,IS-0 0,(n H,S 0,6 acm 0.031 0 2 0,o2-' 0. IZ3 CIS l� G.S o, �- o•S� 0.21 o.21g o.2y �� 1.3� o Z- O.00q D.oY C ► O,o9 0, 0 0 0 0 o.oyB N•� o.o 031 0.o$ 2 ..0 y CA8arry\Gutter Flow SheetAs -r- n Q = 3 Rd P ca = Mox�MKH. �ocd� wit, _ �.S PTA 3..11•ca = �_'M IhAX (S�� �I C1M fQ�.OJ X S • 0.o3Iz� o_zo 4f D o3�tS C L4 (;�= 1.42 c�5 • �j�c C� = c� = 3( 0.21 o.o3ia S I �o CIA S.Je Q = 3 Pi a - F , rJ�041, 4.Y2- = 4 n l't -7.'�i t�, 2,(.q 0. N o.k. O,o3i2S 6 c g 1q :: 6/3 0_ k o_asrzs � y Z o�k 021 o- 70�12 STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN Project Name: /- *# Sheet No.: 1 a Project Number: I y30 Design By: J3C-Z: Description: Check By: w w 0z H O Z V5 Z !- W Z ZQ �0 � W � � Z _Z U LL co - W Z 0 U-J� . U O0 Ww zQOZ � > w w WWWw w Z W Z W = O W W W W zw n. O ? z an. w n. �awnz oQ c U) . n. UQ°daU � �..0 0. 18 0.9 0.9116 3.� 3.50 IS 90� O.00S 3.8 N.6 o.C) Cn -CQy (D 0 )8 23 o.00; 691 - CgZ SS — S,S- — 0.or� 0,oi� (o.Z 0, l0s lS' 23 � O.ol S3 0n S 5,5- .S — o.ol- - 0, 2/I /S" 2-72" a.oZ �:7.S 70 „ C N- cgs 18.4s -- — o.2q I.63 68, 0.00 ll. 7.y o.00� 0.2`1 O.NIq S,6 2.32 „ //Z , a.00> 3.9 V. C61z - c6(3 to Iv — o44 o.o`i1l �I,� 0.20� lS" 23' o.co' 1.8 I/ 6Q13 -c3it I 6oS SN 3.2$ �S" /93/ OooS 3,V y6 62 16 - C6 if I2,� — 12.5 — o.o�� 0.o3rfl 14N o.33y /S " Z..j o,o f 5.3 C. y `/ 63 -+.BN — — o.IZs o.$oq S_3 U.2 n.00�- /S :� / 0.01 0,20 10,41 O.og2 D.obz S to O.g5l ►S 19 o,0 STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN Project Name; �,c�,,,S - �:clti j ;( Sheet No.: 2-/Z Project Number: /y30 Design By: 136C Description: Check By: a N w U z F- _ Z Z w UO Z V U z � � U �O W ZZ wH Co w W N� d Z Q u' N W uw F- O !o LL Nw � W w W W LLJCL W Z Zj U) ILCL � Caz OM x z a w a.0 F � 0 pz pL ¢ QU co u :. d 4U U^ Q ., FL y4- CQZD 1�.5 /3, D.q 0,43 0.Yz/ 0,v21 ��- l,gl IS" 31 ` 0.00� CQao-c�z i i�,S 13.6Y i�.6y — — o,z3`1 D,�s; N.3 2.92- iS z3` 0,00S 7 N 6 CQ2t— c3i /3.3y /3.�N O.o6'I 0, 19 �/ 3 ?, C9 /S lye 0,o0�- y3- Cgig /D, o,(,N 0.3t a.ZH3 o:2.Y3 y.� C4 ig - Cgiq )2- 10. o 193 0,9111 IS c�19 - oJ 0,/0(, i,zq y, 1 0.0N3 lo. ?,,0 $,O 9,0 I.�o 5-3 3,y9 O.oZo -�L.S q.l ,f - cgS 12,5- 9.39 %.79 — o.itg iJI 3 9. l6 /S�� ��/3 0,o2y 8.2- io.o cz-4 -c3g /o,S — /o.S - - o,/6a o.r�N q o.��l �5�" z�' o.oat S,g y.6 C23 -cg( 9,� 9.03 9oa 0,10- 2.00 S. 0 /0,00 Al, z/z' ooi y �,?., >3,0 C36- 13.5 q.S6 q.S6 — — o.i b� y.00 300' QooS S Z 16,0 v l 4/ /-/04J Al` Z 0 1 C?, r,55—A Weston&Sampson Engineers,Inc. 0 wr 2928 Main Street o¢aQ 4qo Glastonbury,CT 06033-1093 c yOO p www.westonandsampson.com Weston& Sampx Tel:(860)659 8668 Fax:(860)659-8875 E N G t N E;E R -S t of 6 Ty Innovative Solutions since 1899 %L •��p.ulnrAnA �� wv January 29, 2002 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06 074 Re: Impacted Soil Management Plan Pudim Farm Residential Development, Barber Hill Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Jacques: Weston& Sampson Engineers Inc. conducted an environmental pesticides soil investigation at the 38-acre Pudim Farm property located on Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, Connecticut, in December 2001. The farm property is being considered for a residential development consisting of single-family residential homes. Findings and conclusions presented in the report identified the presence of chlordane in shallow soils in the former agricultural field area above the CTDEP Remediation Standard Regulations Pollutant Mobility criterion. Based on the findings and conclusions presented in the soil investigation report, Weston & Sampson has prepared the following conceptual soil management plan to address the impacted soils that exceed CTDEP standards. The soil management plan addresses the impacted soils in the context of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) Guidance Document on Development of Agricultural properties (March 1999). Briefly, the CTDEP guidance document outlines several management options to reduce exposure risks associated wi h pesticide related soil impacts. Some of the suggested management options include soil mixing and re-analysis, isolation of impacted soils beneath structures, roadway , or placement of affected soils at sufficient depths below grade to render them as isolz ted from potential exposure. Based on review of this CTDEP guidance document, Weston& Sampson recommends "strip-mining"the top soil from the affected areas of the former agricultural field area and mixing the soil with either deeper soils, or soils from unaffected areas of the property to reduce the effective concentration of chlordane in the site soils. Upon completion of soil stock-piling and mixing Weston & Sampson recommends collected six (6) to eight (8) soil samples from the soil piles for laboratory analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the impacted soil management approach relative to CTDEP soil standards. Mamcbuseas(HQ) IV cbuseus conreaicur Rhode Island Nowliampsbire Maine Five Centennial Drive 100 Foxborough Blvd,Suite 250 2928 Main Street 2348 Post Road,Suite 8 195 Hanover Street,Suite 28 PO Box 189 lrcr"t�hrt ruper Peabody,MA 01960-7985 Foxberough,MA 02035 Glastonbury,CT 06033-1093 Warwick,RI 02886-2271 Portsmouth,NH 03801 York,ME 03909 Weston&Sampson Engineers,Inc. Mr.John Jacques January 29,2002 Page 2 of 2 If the laboratory data demonstrate that the reported concentrations for selected analytical parameters are below applicable CTDEP standards,then the soils would be suitable for unrestricted use at the development. In the event that soil data exceed CTDEP standards the affected soils would be better suited to placement beneath building structures or roadways in accordance with CTDEP-policy. Weston& Sampson appreciates the opportunity to be of services to Jacques Construction LLC. Please call Mitchell R. Chester at(860) 659-8668 to discuss this project. Very truly yours, WESTON& SAMPSON ENGINEERS,INC. Mitchell R. Chester, LEP Project Manager ltecyrlrrlPrryc• e`• -• co VOL. 1784PAGE 323 WARRANTY DEED 6 5 (OPEN SPACE) TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: KNOW YE, THAT VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., a Connecticut Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford ,and State of Connecticut (hereinafter referred to as the"Grantor"), for the consideration of LEGAL CONSIDERATION ONLY—NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION received to its full satisfaction of TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut (hereinafter referred to.as the"Grantee"), does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, and unto its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece or parcel of land located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, shown as "OPEN SPACE 376,133 S.F. 8.63 Ac." on a map or plan as are more particularly described on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said premises are conveyed subject to the following encumbrances: 1. Building, building line and zoning restrictions of the Town of South Windsor, and to conditions of subdivision approval as set forth on maps or plans on file with respect to the subdivision in which the above premises are located. 2. Taxes on the Grand List of October 1, 2002, which taxes the Grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay as part consideration for this deed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto it the said Grantee, and unto its successors and assigns forever, to them and theirs own proper use and behoof. AND ALSO,the said Grantor, does for itself, its successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these presents, it is well seized of the premises, as a good indefeasible estate in FEE SHVIPLE; and has good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written; and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as above stated. AND FURTHERMORE, the said Grantor, does by these presents bind itself and its successors and assigns forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to him, the said Grantee, and to its successors and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as above stated. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATES LOCAL$ No. X Doc ID: 000433880003 Type: LAN Book 1784 Page 323 - 325 File# 65 TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR _ . VOL. 17 8 4 PAGE 324 IN WITNESS WHE OF, VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C. has caused this Instrument to be executed this -J day of December 2002. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the P ese ce of: GRANTOR: VINTA E HILLS , L.L.C. By Jacq is a ger/Member STATE OF CONNECTICUT) / ss: South Windsor Dece ber ` 2002 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the y of December 2002, before me, Harold R. Cummings, the undersigned officer, personally appeared VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., acting herein by John Jacques, Its Manager/Member, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledges that he executed the same on behalf of said company for the purposes herein contained., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand. Harol R. Cummings Commissioner of the Superior Court Grantee's Address: 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 voL. 1784PAGE 3 2 SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS, LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD OPEN SPACE The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/1430/17LOTSUBDIV/1430_4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers Planners - Surveyors - GIS 860 . 291 • 8755 165 south satellite road - south windsor connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 20% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said map is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: DECEIVED FOR REE�CO�,,,,R;;DD�: DATE ®4 5 TIME—()0L1 M. 1 1 Il(1 C x_ ►c� Q TOWN CLERK, SOUTH WI NDSOR- CT" VOl: 1784PAGE 326 WARRANTY DEED (ROADS) j 66 I TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: KNOW YE, THAT VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., a Connecticut Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford ,and State of Connecticut(hereinafter referred to as the"Grantor"), for the consideration of LEGAb CONSIDERATION ONLY—NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION received to its full satisfaction of TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut (hereinafter referred to as the"Grantee"), does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, and unto its successors and assigns forever, two certain pieces or parcels of land located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being two roadways known as Vintage Lane and Nature's Way as are more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said premises are conveyed subject to the following encumbrances: 1. Building, building line and zoning restrictions of the Town of South Windsor, and to conditions of subdivision approval as set forth on maps or plans on file with respect to the subdivision in which the above premises are located. 2. Taxes on the Grand List of October 1, 2002, which taxes the Grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay as part consideration for this deed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto it the said Grantee, and unto its successors and assigns forever, to them and theirs own proper use and behoof. AND ALSO, the said Grantor, does for itself, its successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these presents, it is well seized of the premises, as a good indefeasible estate in FEE SIMPLE; and has good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written; and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as above stated. AND FURTHERMORE, the said Grantor, does by these presents bind itself and its successors and assigns forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to him, the said Grantee, and to its successors and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as above stated. CONVEYANCE Tax RECEIVED IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII STATE�$ � LOCAL S No. Doc ID: 000433890003 Type: LAN Book 1784 Page 326 - 328 U File# 66 TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR VOL. 17 8 4 PAGE 327 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C. has caused this Instrument to _. be executed this_day of December 2002. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presen a of. GRANTOR: VINTAGE HILLS , L.L.C. u G/ By ohn Jac es, s anager/Member STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss: South Windsor December 2002 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the_day of December 2002, before me, Harold R. Cummings, the undersigned officer, personally appeared VINTAGE HILLS, L.L.C., acting herein by John Jacques, Its Manager/Member, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledges that he executed the same on behalf of said company for the purposes herein contained., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunt set my hand. Harold R. Cummings Commissioner of the.Superior Court Grantee's Address: 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 VOL. 17 8 4 PAsE 3 28 SCHEDULE A VINTAGE HILLS,LLC—WEST SIDE OF BARBER HILL ROAD VINTAGE LANE AND NATURE'S WAY The premises subject to the foregoing instrument are shown on a certain map entitled: "SUBDIVISION PLAN PLOT PLAN PROPERTY SURVEY/RESURVEY PREPARED FOR: VINTAGE HILLS Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut Design: RA Drawn: RA Checked: RPM Job No.: 1430 Date: 12-03-01 Drawing No.: Jobs/143 0/17LOTSLTBDIWI 43 0—4-7 design professionals, inc. Civil Engineers Planners - Surveyors • GIS 860 . 291 - 8755 165 south satellite road • south windsor connecticut 06074 Graphic Scale 1 inch=40 ft. REVISIONS No. 1 2-13-02 PER TOWN STAFF COMMENTS, 2 4-23-02 ADD 20% OPEN SPACE, 3 05/17/02 ADDRESS TOWN COMMENTS, 4 06/17/02 Address Town comments and approval conditions, 5 07/11/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS, 6 07/16/02 PER TOWN COMMENTS SHEET 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21. Said map is on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of South Windsor. Said Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: REC =1Vr" D FOR RECORD. GATE I 0 0 IME—Lw M, Tot A6cSL��An�- ,aCqu, Con:atructlon, LLO 67 Ridge Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Phone 860.432.1823 License CTNHC 1780 Pager 860.320.2295 Fax 860.432.2510 April 12,2002 ME C=; Marcia Banach, Director of Planning APR 1 8 20OZ Town of South Windsor SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Marcia: It is my intent to resubmit an application for the above referenced subdivision as a conventional subdivision with 20%open space. There will be a few minor adjustments to the plan presented to you last week, however, it does not effect the open space area as shown on the maps you have. Therefore, I am requesting you start the scheduling process with the Open Space Task Force. In the interim, Design Professionals will be revising the plans and will submit a formal application within a week or so. Please feel free to contact me if there is anything I can do to expedite this process. I know you and the Town Staff are extremely busy, and I appreciate all you can do with this request. Si erelyy,, /f John Jacqu s Jacques C struct , :LLC CC: Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals Harold Cummings, Esq. s DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. . civil engineers -planners •surveyors •gis=gps April 25, 2002 Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Traffic Engineering Report Vintage Hills Subdivision APR 2 6 2002 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut SOUTH WINDSOR PLAN10C DELFT, DPi Project No. 01-1430 Dear Marcia: Our client, Jacques Construction, L.L.C., is proposing a 17-lot conventional single-family residential subdivision in South Windsor. The subject 35t acre tract is located on the west side of Barber Hill Road, approximately one mile north of Miller Road, and approximately four tenths of a mile south of the East Windsor town line. The entire development is projected to be constructed over a two or three year period. Each residence is estimated to range from 2,500 sq.ft.to 4,500 sq.ft.floor area,with a two or three car garage, and three or more bedrooms. Lot sizes range from approximately one acre to multiple acres. Total parking is estimated to be approximately 42 spaces, and total floor area is estimated at approximately 54,000 sq.ft. Given that this development does not abut a state highway, and that it does not meet the minimum threshold development parameters of 100,000 square feet of floor area or 200 parking spaces, no Certificate of Operations from the State Traffic Commission will be required (CGS 13-311). Access and egress for Vintage Hills is to be provided via two new cul-de-sac local streets, paved to a 26-foot width. The primary roadway is Vintage Lane, a 1,300 foot long street situated 5,400 feet north of Miller Road and 1,850 feet south of the last Windsor Town Line. Vintage Lane terminates some 100 feet south of the project's northerly property line, in the site's northwest comer, and has been designed for future extension to the vacant tract to the north. A right-of-way and slope rights have been retained to accommodate this future extension. Topographic features of the subject site and of the site to the north appear to support an extension. Approximately 750 feet into the site, another new cul-de-sac street, Nature's Way, is proposed off the south side of Vintage Lane. It is approximately 340 I.f. in length and, given the large proposed open space tract to the south, has not been designed for extension in the future. With minor vegetative clearing along the subject site's frontage, available sight lines are 850+feet looking to the north, and nearly 2,000 feet looking to the south. Vegetation is as close as two feet from Barber Hill Road's westerly edge of pavement. Vegetation should be cut back approximately six feet from the edge of pavement in order to maximize available sight lines. Two deciduous trees, both in relatively poor condition, should be removed along the frontage. The first, approximately 70 feet north of the Vintage Lane entrance, is some five feet from the edge of pavement,while the latter is approximately 105 feet north of the entrance, and only two feet from the edge of pavement. Available sight lines,with minor clearing, are excellent. Traffic volumes were observed to be very light. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers,Trip Generation,4t edition, some 10.06 one-way daily trips can be anticipated per residence at Vintage Hills. Accordingly,some 171 one-way trips will be generated daily for the entire subdivision, or approximately 86 round trips. In view of workplace,shopping, school and other trip destinations,we estimate 70%of all daily trips will be to and from the south,which translates into 120 one-way trips, or 60 round trips. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 iQtim *Ini Q 744 V, /QAM 1)01 Q747 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers•planners•surveyors•gis•gps Average daily A.M. peak site-generated traffic generation is estimated at 13 trips, or nine trips to the south and four trips to the north. Average daily P.M. peak site generation is estimated at 17 trips, or 12 trips to the south and five trips to the north. Obviously,the volume of existing background traffic and of site-generated traffic is low. Conclusion In conclusion, it is the professional opinion of Design Professionals, Inc.that the proposed Vintage Hills subdivision,to be located off Barber Hill Road in South Windsor,will not adversely impact the operation of traffic in and around the adjoining street network in 2004 when the 17 lots are fully built and occupied. After minor vegetative clearing along the subject parcel's frontage, available sight lines are excellent to the north and south. Traffic generation is projected to be minimal. And, finally, no STC permit is anticipated. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: Galen B. Sempr bon, P.E. Director of Engineering cc: John Jacques Harold Cummings, Esq. Barry Ellison, Project Engineer \\Randy\d\FORMS\LETTERS\1430Jacques Traffic Engineering Report.doc 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 fQAm 101 Q1141Z V_iQtim Inm Q17417 towN a�� Tiolwn opsiotd'h ?d4r,&� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soe•co� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 May 2,2002 Ann Jacques Jacques Construction 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision. Dear Mrs. Jacques: Per your request I am writing to inform you that an application to the Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission will not be necessary for a second Vintage Hills subdivision application based on the following facts. - I have reviewed conceptual plans for a proposed open space subdivision. - The plan shows less house lots than what was approved by the Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission. - There are no proposed changes to stormwater structures or wetland impacts from the plan that was approved by the Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission on February 20, 2002. If the proposed plans should change with either increased lot numbers, or if there should be a significant change to the configuration of the proposed stormwater system or proposed wetland impacts, then an additional review and determination by this office may be necessary. Please contact me if you have any questions on this correspondence at 644-2511 x229. Sincerely yours, Jeffrey H. Folger ��'�1�/�Q Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer MAY 3 2002 cc. Director of Planning SOUry""OSOR PLANNNG DRpI RECEIVED MEMORANDUM MAY 7 2002 To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Date: 5/6/02 RE: App 02-21 P—Vintage Hills Subdivision, Barber Hill Road I have reviewed the revised subdivision application (dated 4/23/02) for the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision, and have the following comments: 1. There should not be easements to the Town of South Windsor around yard drains on private lots. These currently exist on lots 18, 15, 7, and 8. Also remove the drainage easement to the Town of South Windsor on the side of Lot 4 and move the drainage pipe if necessary. 2. Turn the two catch basins 900 at the end of Vintage lane. 3. Spot elevations are needed in the front and left side of lot 10 to clarify the grading by elevation 334, which appears to be a flat spot. 4. Should there be a buffer to separate lots 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 17 from the agricultural property to the north, that may be farmed? 5. No footing drain is shown for the house on Lots 17 and 5. 6. Include a note to clear existing vegetation to provide clear sight lines along Barber Hill Road both north and south of Vintage Lane. We will review the areas along Barber Hill where vegetation is to be cleared. We want to insure that trees and shrubs that are in good condition and can be saved are not removed. 7. The sidewalks at the east end of Vintage Lane need to terminate with ramps out to this street. 8. On Sheet 9, the proposed stop sign is shown in the pavement. 9. More information is needed to clarify grading and lot-to-lot drainage in the back and sides of lots 1, 2, and 3. There is a large area without proposed contours. The existing contour is not labeled and this area appears to be flat. 10.The foundation drain from the house on Lot 1 should be relocated because it is shown discharging uphill from the leaching fields and toward Town open space. 11. 1 or 2 catch basins are needed at the bottom of the driveway for Lot 8 to catch surface runoff that will flow down the driveway before it gets to the road. A yard drain off the driveway is not sufficient since it is more likely to get clogged by grass, leaves, snow and ice, and not catch runoff from the driveway. 12.Show a swale on the north side of Lot 7 to collect surface runoff before the sidewalk and road. Direct this water to Y2. 13. Two more yard drains are needed in the front of Lots 6/7 before the street line to catch surface runoff coming down the hill. 14.The gas main should be located under the pavement, on the opposite side of the road as the water main. These should be at least 4-6 feet out from the curb so they do not interfere with drainage pipes and structures. 15. As part of the overall subdivision review process we request elevations be shown on all the driveways at the house and the road, and the slopes of these driveways be included on the subdivision plans prior to approval. This will facilitate our review of grading and drainage and speed up the building permit review process. 16.The outlet from the detention pond should be aligned with the flow in the natural channel. The rip rap needs to be extended further downstream. 17. Provide an access road to the two drainage outlets and the detention basin for maintenance vehicles 18. Include an outlet pipe with a flared end from the catch basin along Barber Hill Road to this property, and a rip rap splash pad in accordance with Town Specifications. We will discuss any additional drainage work that is needed in this area with the applicant and coordinate this work with the site contractor. 19. Rights to drain in favor of South Windsor are not needed on Town open space. 20. Two minor revisions are needed to the grading plan for the intersection of Natures Way and Vintage lane. Remove the flat spot in the middle of this intersection at elevation 326. The elevation shown on the grading plan where CB17 is proposed is higher than the elevation on the plan and profile sheets. 21. Final Design plans need to be reviewed and approved by the Town Environmental Health Officer for the proposed septic systems. The septic systems will need to include curtain drains and meet the required separation distances. Surface elevations for the septic will need to be shown. 22.Show underdrains along both sides of these roads due to soil conditions and the probability of high groundwater. 23. Monuments should be shown along the front of this property to establish the street line for Barber Hill Road. 24. 1 did not receive revised drainage calculations and I will call the Engineer about the drainage calculations for this subdivision. Please call me at extension 245 if you have any questions. qOW N Se coS-Otd/7' V&U&ot 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Sox•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 10, 2004 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl#02-21P, Vintage Hills Phase I Dear: Mr. Jacques: The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letters of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Vintage Hills Phase I SBM $35,540.00* I1/8/04 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term until April 13, 2005. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly? *maintenance expires on 4/13/05 Si cerely, Michele R. i'p`e;:A CP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kak cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official SOWN SF4 Tlov / (i 0 �� V&U&Ot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 r�OSOR•G°` TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 February 21, 2006 Mr.John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl#02-21P,Vintage Hills Phase I and II Dear Mr.Jacques: This is to advise you that the.Planning and Zoning Commission voted on February 14, 2006 to release the IWA/CC bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of 25,000. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s) will be available. . If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Patrick Kennedy, Chairm PK/bmm cc: .Town Engineer