Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubdivision (121) iUWr Ur bOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM Application No: 01 - 6 ZP Official Receipt Date: lal 11161 �� �r/� Receipt No: DEC 1 o 2 1 APPLICANT: Jacques Construction, LLC, c% John Jacques SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT PROJECT NAME: Vintaqe Hills (conventional subdivision) ADDRESS: 67 Ridge Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: Estate of John Pudim, Jr. ADDRESS:c/d Edward Pudim Administrator, 277 Main Streit Somers CT 06071 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: west side of Barber Hill goad ASSESSOR'S MAP #-139— PARCEL# 1 ZONE RR NAME, ADDRESS, TEL & FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMal 1 i e_ pesi cW PrnfPs iona l s l Inc. 165 South Satal 1 i try go d, 9outh Windaor, CT, 06074, Telo 291-8755 Fax• 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ® Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing Required) ❑ Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Temporary and Conditional Permit for (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Major Home Occupation for (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission.. ignatur f A 1' ant l -�t' , Signature of Property O er Direct Abutting Property Owners DPI Project No. 01-1430 Jacques Construction, LLC Barber Hill Road, West side Map/Lot Abutting Property Owneitsl Mailing Address 139/6 John D. Jr. &Jennifer M. Dzen 985 Foster Street Ext. South Windsor, CT 06074 139/7 Roxanne M. &Robert J. Mongeon 229 Old Farm Road South Windsor, CT 06074 148/30 Anita J. Roy 388 Abbe Road South Windsor, CT 06074 149/5 Theresa Gedrim 655 Nevers Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Vintage Hills—potential denial sections within the Subdivision Regulations • B.1.Regulations and Zoning: b. Subdivisions should generally be consistent with the Town Plan of Development and other applicable local plans. Not in conformance with Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan nor Open Space Master Plan. • C.Lb.Mandatory Open Space Subdivision:In order to meet the goals and objectives for open space preservation contained in the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as well as...the Town Plan of Conservation and Development,the Open Space Master Plan,the Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan...or when a site proposed for subdivision has been identified in a Master Plan noted above as a desirable site for open space and/or recreation,the Commission may require an open space subdivision rather than a conventional subdivision.(Note:the regulations allow the Commission to waive this requirement where site conditions clearly prevent a reduction in the minimum lot size.) eL ry� � Cam r i e� X6� with a copy of any proposed regulations or amendments thereto, except map amendments, at least thirty-five (35) days before the public hearing. 17.3 An application filed with the Inland Wetlands Agency, which is in conformance with the applicable inland wetlands regulations as of the date of the receipt of such application, shall not be required thereafter to comply with any change in inland wetlands regulations, including changes to upland review area boundaries, taking effect on or after the date of receipt and any appeal from the decision of such Agency with respect to such application shall not be dismissed by the Superior Court on the grounds that such a change has taken effect on or after the date of receipt. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to apply(1) to the establishment, amendment or change of boundaries of inland wetlands or watercourses or (2) to any change in regulations necessary to make such regulations consistent with the provisions of Chapter 440 of the Connecticut General Statutes as of the date of such receipt. rocedure A. Any owner who disputes the designation of any part of his or her and as a regulated area on the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Map, may petition the Agency to change the designation in accordance with this section of these regulations. All petitions for a map change shall be submitted in writing and shall include all relevant facts and circumstances, which support the change. The petitioner shall provide proof that the designation is inapplicable. Documentation, in accordance with these regulations, may be required of the property owner when the agency requires an accurate delineation of regulated areas. B. Petitions requesting changes or amendments to the "Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Map, South Windsor, Connecticut" shall be in writing and submitted in triplicate. This shall contain at least the following: 1. The applicant's name, home and business addresses and telephone numbers; 2. The owner's name (if not the applicant), home and business addresses, telephone numbers, and a written consent to the proposed action set forth in the application; 3. Applicants interest in the land; 4. The geographical location of the property involved in the petition, including a description of the land in sufficient detail to allow identification of the disputed wetland or watercourse areas on the Inland -34- J Wetlands and Watercourses Map, including the parcel number as shown on the current Tax Assessor's Map. 5. The reasons for the requested action; 6. The names and addresses of adjacent property owners; and 7. A map showing proposed development of the property, if available. C. The Agency may require the petitioner to present documentation by a soil scientist that the land in question does not have a soil type classified by the National Cooperative Soils Survey as poorly drained, very poorly drained, alluvial, or flood plain. Such documentation includes a map of the land in question signed by a soil scientist on which the flag locations defining the boundaries of the regulated soil types are depicted. D. Watercourses, as defined in section 2.1 FF of these regulations, shall be delineated by a soil scientist, geologist, ecologist, or other qualified individual. E. A public hearing shall be held on petitions to amend the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Map. Notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper having substantial circulation in the municipality at least twice at intervals of not less than two (2) days, the first not more than fifteen(15) days nor less than ten (10) days, and the last not less than two (2) days, before such hearing. A copy of such proposed boundary change shall be filed in the office of the town clerk for public inspection at least ten(10) days before such hearing. F. Within ninety(90) days after receipt, in the office of the Agency, of a petition for a change in the mapped boundaries of any wetland or watercourse, the Agency shall hold a public hearing to consider the petition. The Agency shall act upon the changes requested in such petition within sixty(60) days after the close of the hearing. The public hearing shall be concluded within forty-five (45) days. The petitioner may consent to one or more extensions of the periods specified in this subsection for the holding of the hearing and for action on such petition, provided the total extension of any such period shall not be for longer than the original period as specified in this subsection, or may withdraw such petition. The failure of the inland wetlands agency to act within any time period specified in this subsection, or any extension there of, shall not be deemed to constitute approval of the petition. G. The Agency shall make its decision and state, in writing, the reasons why the change in the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Map was made; or in the event that it was denied the Commission shall state the reasons for denial. -35 - Natural Resources ra a i me an Rye/Barton Lawrence 1 161 .45 acres 57.57 ac s X ss Mitchell 75-34 acres State Land Preserved Land by Others First Phase Inventory Properties Town-owned Land Podunk Nevers 171.0 acres Priest 137.22 acres N 72.6 acres 0 W E 4 Miles ------ ............. S Microsoft TerraServer Image Page Page 1 of 2 MSN Home Hotmail Web Search Shopping Money People & Chat Con AN r s _ i f -- ----------- ! i t lanst AwAft sn Select -- City TLU Ht3meAdvisor" Ad ,':lit.- .E! ;'t2t4'4:>iet1er 1 --ip I search rin_;�.,_:_ E Iaij Pent. .'�-in:iC € -00li i3c'c:ofdtP i erra �.rve;- Find ID Advanced Find ulla ge Info Image Size: Small Medium LargeStyle: belief Togo Irna( Locator G` 5 km W of Vernon, Connecticut, United States 23 Apr Pr zoom imid4111011-j T . . - Other Imagery: USGS To o Mac. £' HomeAdvisor Links: +� . :,rnes tor saie n 0601 6 - . .r ;ra 060 b ter' ... _ool t imip- and Encarta Articles: -- East Hartford Enfield ----- QastofiL lry (Connecticut) Hartford Manchester (Connecticut) Vernon Colinecricutj Conllecticut) Windsor Logs UZO-11 3=T http.-//terraserver.homeadvi sor.msn.com/image.asp?5=10&T=1&X=3 5 24&Y=23 18 8&Z=I... 12/23/2001 J y ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe•co��� AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 November 27, 2001 Mr. John Dzen Jr. 985 Foster Street Extension South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Dzen: This correspondence is intended as a follow-up to our conversation of November 21, 2001 during which time you informed me of the past existence of a very large, buried fuel tank on the Pudim Property (west side of Barber Hill Road, South Windsor) adjacent to a shed near Barber Hill Road. You recalled the tank being removed some time in the past and expressed concerns regarding possible contamination on the property. You also suggested that area would be a good place to start looking for contamination on the property and that if contamination exists on that property, it may flow onto the adjacent Dzen property. I have orally informed the DEP regarding this issue and have given them your name should they wish to follow up with you. I will also notify them similarly in writing. Very truly yours, A4e_ Robert Deptula, R. S. Environmental Health Officer RD/cm cc: Mr. Michael Senyk RECEIVED DEP NOV 2 8 2001 PERD 179 Elm Street SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, Hartford, CT 06106 ��F� 1 ,^�� 1• ti ^ 1 / S'OUZA ?&&440t ro) S ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co��� AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 November 28, 2001 Mr. Michael Senyk DEP PERD 179 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106 Dear Mr. Senyk: This correspondence is intended as a follow-up to the voice mail message left with you on November 21, 2001, regarding the report of possible contamination on the Pudim Property (west side of Barber Hill Road) South Windsor. On November 111 2001, John Dzen Jr., 985 Foster Street Extension advised me that a very large buried fuel tank was removed from the above mentioned property and that he was concerned about the possibility of contamination on the property. He further suggested to me that the area where he claims the tank was previously located would be a good place to start looking for contamination on that site, and that if contamination exists on the Pudim Property it may flow onto the adjacent Dzen Property. Enclosed is a copy of a sketch from Mr. Dzen showing the area of the old tank. It depicts a pond, tobacco barn, shed and dirt roads. The words"pond"and "fuel tank"were added by myself after his explanation. The Town has no independent information to either support or refute Mr. Dzen's claims. Very truly yours, �� Robert Deptula, R. S. Environmental Health Officer RECEIVED RD/cm NOV 2 8 2001 cc: Mr. John Dzen SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. 985 Foster Street Ext. South Windsor, CT 06074 I Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning �✓ Dc."ccmber 6.2001 To Whom It May Coaecrn: Please he advised that Peter R. DeMa.11ic and Design Proicssiptrets,Inc, is h=by autholmed to situp auy and all applicaLions usticiated with the 4evelopment of am property on Barber Hill Road r.South Windsor,Conwticut. We further authosizz ttA-jobmission of land use applicsadom awaciated with the devolopmcm of tbis property, Sincerely, .� 3 f John Pudim,Jr. By: wEdward huiim Administrator cc- Peter Y7eMallie . .r'ri✓l.G '. e.�-tk ��6 GLi� lz�ns,o.i THU 17:56 1TX{R1 Yu bola) r DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers •planners • surveyors • gis • gps December 10, 2001 Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Traffic Engineering Report Vintage Hills Subdivision Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut DPI Project No. 01-1430 Dear Marcia: Our client, Jacques Construction, L.L.C., is proposing a 19-lot conventional single- family residential subdivision in South Windsor. The subject 35±acre tract is located on the west side of Barber Hill Road, approximately one mile north of Miller Road, and approximately 4/1 Oths of a mile south of the East Windsor town line. The entire development is projected to be constructed over a two or three year period. Each residence is estimated to range from 2,500 sq. ft.to 4,500 sq. ft. floor area, with a two or three car garage, and three or more bedrooms. Lot sizes range from approximately one acre to multiple acres. Total parking is estimated to be approximately 47 spaces, and total floor area is estimated at approximately 60,000 sq. ft. Given that this development does not abut a state highway, and that it does not meet the minimum threshold development parameters of 100,000 square feet of floor area or 200 parking spaces, no Certificate of Operations from the State Traffic Commission will be required (CGS 13-311). Access and egress for Vintage Hills is to be provided via two new cul-de-sac local streets, paved to a 26-foot width. The primary roadway is Vintage Lane, a 1,300-foot long street situated 5,400 feet north of Miller Road and 1,850 feet south of the East Windsor Town Line. Vintage Lane terminates some 100 feet south of the project's northerly property line, in the site's northwest corner, and has been designed for future extension to the vacant tract to the north. A right-of-way and slope rights have been retained to accommodate this future extension. Topographic features of the subject site and of the site to the north appear to support an extension. Approximately 750 feet into the site, another new cul-de-sac street,Nature's Way, is proposed off the south side of Vintage Lane. It is approximately 4801.f. in length. A right-of-way and slope rights have been depicted for a possible future extension to the large tract to the south(Dzen Tree Farm). Topographic features of both sites appear to support a future extension, if necessary. With minor vegetative clearing along the subject site's frontage, available sight lines are 850+ feet looking to the north, and nearly 2,000 feet looking to the south. Vegetation is as close as two feet from Barber Hill Road's westerly edge of pavement. Vegetation should be cut back approximately six feet from the edge of pavement in order to DAFORMSU_.ETTERSU430Jacques Traffic Engineering Report.doc 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Telephone(860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers• planners • surveyors • gis• gps maximize available sight lines. Two deciduous trees, both in relatively poor condition, should be removed along the frontage. The first, approximately 70 feet north of the Vintage Lane entrance, is some 5 feet from the edge of pavement,while the latter is approximately 105 feet north of the entrance, and only 2 feet from the edge of pavement. Available sight lines, with minor clearing, are excellent. Traffic volumes were observed to be very light. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 40'edition, some 10.06 one-way daily trips can be anticipated per residence at Vintage Hills. Accordingly, some 191 one-way trips will be generated daily for the entire subdivision, or approximately 96 round trips. In view of workplace, shopping, school and other trip destinations,we estimate 70%of all daily trips will be to and from the south, which translates into 134 one-way trips, or 67 round trips. Average daily A.M. peak site-generated traffic generation is estimated at 14 trips, or 10 trips to the south and 4 trips to the north. Average daily P.M. peak site generation is estimated at 19 trips, or 13 trips to the south and 6 trips to the north. Obviously, the volume of existing background traffic and of site-generated traffic is low. Conclusion In conclusion, it is the professional opinion of Design Professionals, Inc. that the proposed Vintage Hills subdivision, to be located off Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, will not adversely impact the operation of traffic in and around the adjoining street network in 2004 when the 19 lots are fully built and occupied. After minor vegetative clearing along the subject parcel's frontage, available sight lines are excellent to the north and south. Traffic generation is projected to be minimal. And, finally, no STC permit is anticipated. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: Galen B. Sempre n, P.E. Director of Engineering cc: John Jacques WFORWLETTERSU430Jacques Traffic Engineering Report.doc 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,CT 06074 Telephone(860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers • planners • surveyors • gis Transmitted via certified mail Dear Current Abutting Property Owner December 10, 2001 Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision DPI Project No. 01-1430 Barber Hill Road(West Side) South Windsor, Connecticut In accordance with regulations of the Inland Wetlands Agency and the Planning &Zoning Commission, we are required to notify you that an application has been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing(s) by the Inland Wetlands Agency and Planning &Zoning Commission. The applications and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and/or give comments, however, you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the meeting if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application will be heard,please contact Kelli Gaetano,Administrative Secretary, Michele Lipe, Deputy Planning Director, or Jeffrey Folger, Environmental Planner, at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253, 252 or 229, respectively. Thank you. Sincerely, DESIGN FESSIO ALS, INC. By: Peter R. DeMallie Principal cc: Jeffrey Folger Marcia Banach John Jacques 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Telephone(860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 L ' Stormwater Management Plan Vintage Hills South Windsor, Connecticut RECEIVED DEC 1 0 2001 SOUTH VVINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 DPI Project No. 99-1430 December 10, 2001 t Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Proposed Development 1 Off-Site Analysis 1 Peak Runoff control 2 Nonstructural Drainage System 2 Riparian Buffers 2 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Storm-water Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 3 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations 5 Conclusions 5 Appendices TR-55 Existing Conditions A TR-55 Developed Conditions B Detention Basin Reservoir Report C Detention Basin Routings D Storm Sewer Calculations E t i I Introduction: The site is located on the west side of Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, Connecticut, and consists of a single parcel of land totaling 34.6 Acres. Portions of the site were used for farming, and the site contains a number of old barns and a farm pond. The site contains two sections of wetlands; one area along the frontage of the site on the south end which contains the farm pond, and a second area of wetlands along the north western end of the site. A small portion of the site drains to the wetlands along the western side of the site. A larger portion of the site drains to the southeast to the existing ditch that runs adjacent to the pond and drains off site to the south. A third portion of the site in the north east and central area of the site drains to the north off site. The area of the site draining toward the farm pond does not actually drain into the farm pond. The grades around the farm pond prevent surface water from entering the pond from the site. The only surface discharge to the pond is from a portion of the runoff from Barber Hill road. A cross culvert presently discharges in the vicinity of the pond. A portion of the storm flows from this culvert enter the pond. Proposed Development: The proposed development of the site includes the construction of public roadways to service 19 residential building lots. The site will be serviced by public water, and will have individual on-site septic systems for each house. The Storm drainage system proposed for the development includes the installation of storm-sewers within the proposed roadways, and a detention/Water Quality Basin in the vicinity of the existing pond. The proposed detention/Water Quality Basin will augment the existing pond without introducing direct runoff into the pond. Due to the restrictive soil conditions on the site, there is no practical potential for infiltration of runoff from the site into the ground. The Detention/Water Quality basin will provide full detention of storm flows for storms up to the 100 year design storm, and discharge at peak rates equal to or less than existing, and also provide water quality treatment for the smaller more frequent storm events. Off-Site Analysis: The site presently drains in three directions. The western end of the site drains to a wetlands area on site, and then offsite-to the northwest. The north central portion of the site drains to the north offsite. The larger southern side of the site drains to the southeast off site via an existing ditch. The majority of the proposed development of the site will be within the southern watershed draining off site to the south. The proposed detention/Water Quality Basin will be in this area adjacent to the farm pond. The site has been designed to continue to discharge in the three directions presently with peak flows under developed conditions approximately equal to or less than existing peak discharge rates. Peak Runoff Control: The site has been designed to continue to discharge in the three directions presently with peak flows under developed conditions approximately equal to or less than existing peak discharge rates. Nonstructural Drainage Systems: The site presently drains overland in three directions. Under developed conditions, the drainage to the northwest and north will continue to be overland with no structural measures utilized. The drainage to the south that presently enters the ditch around the farm pond at various locations will be collected under developed conditions into a storm drainage system and discharge to the proposed Detention/Water Quality Basin. The discharge from the basin will be to the existing ditch. Riparian Buffers: There is presently a tree farm on the south side of the site. The tree farm has cleared essentially to the property line and has left no buffer. To the maximum extent feasible, a buffer will be provided along the southern property line of the proposed subdivision. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the subdivision design. These measures include the following: 1. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of silt fence around catch basins. 4. Use of the detention/water quality basin during construction as a sediment basin. 5. Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 6. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 7. Installation of construction entrance pads, and sweeping of roadways as needed. 8. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality: The detention/Water quality basin has been designed as a wet bottom basin with approximately 9" of depth below the outlet elevation for long term retention. The volume of runoff from a 1.5" rainfall event was determined from the TR- 55 analysis, and found to be approximately 8,200 CF of runoff. The volume of retention in the 9" depth below the outlet will be over 10,000 CF. Therefore, there is adequate volume of permanent pool retention for the runoff from the site. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to the detention/water quality basin. The piped drainage system has been designed to accommodate the runoff from a 10 Yr design storm. The detention/water quality basin has been designed to handle up to a 100 year design storm with full detention. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site presently discharges to three locations; to the northwest, north, and south. Under developed conditions, the discharges to the northwest and north will continue as overland flows with no structural controls. The r r l discharge to the south will be via the proposed detention/water quality basin into the existing ditch that presently collects runoff from the site. Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water System, and Detention/Water Quality Basin. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide, and additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system. Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. Catch Basins: The catch Basins within each lot shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reaches 1'. Pavement Sweeping: The public streets within the subdivision should be swepted a minimum of once a year; in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season. Basin Spillway: The stone spillway shall be inspected twice yearly. All large, woody growth that may affect the flow of water or the stability of the spillway shall be removed. The spillway shall also be inspected after any flow passes through it. The riprap shall be re-arranged and added to as required to maintain the design as per the design plans. Topographic Contour Maps: Topographic contour maps have been provided showing the drainage areas for the site at a scale of F=100'. The maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included in the rear of this report. Floodplain Boundaries: There are no floodplain boundaries on the site. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The drainage piping on site was designed using the rational formula. The detention basin was sized using a computer program by Hydrographs called Hydroflow. The program allows for the development of hydrographs representing the developed flows into the basin, and the modeling of the basin with elevation/storage/discharge curves to represent the basin. The program than provides the routing of the hydrograph through the basin, and provides peak discharge and storage information. Under existing and developed conditions, the site will continue to drain in the three directions; to the northwest, north, and south. The TR-55 analysis for the existing discharge to the northwest, north, and south is included in appendix A. A summary of the discharges is as follows: 3 1 1 Storm Freq. Discharge Northwest Discharge North Discharge South 2 1 0 3 10 4 1 13 25 5 3 20 50 7 5 26 100 9 7 33 The TR-55 analysis for the developed discharge to the northwest, north and south is included in appendix B. The summary of the results of the existing and developed discharges in the three directions is as follows: Design Freq. Northwest North South Exist. Devel. Exist. Devel. Exist. Devel. 2 1 1 0 1 3 12 10 4 4 1 3 13 28 25 5 6 3 4 20 38 50 7 7 5 6 26 47 100 9 9 7 7 33 57 The increase in runoff to the south due to the development of the roadways and lots would result in an increase in peak runoff in this direction. The proposed detention basin has been designed to mitigate this increase in peak runoff, and discharge under developed conditions at peak rates equal to or less than under existing conditions. The detention basin reservoir report is included in appendix C. The routing of the storm flows for the 2-100 year design storms are included in appendix D. The following table summarizes the peak flows under existing conditions to the south, and from the detention basin to the south. Storm Freq. Existing discharge to south Peak discharge from basin 2 3 2.94 10 13 12.31 25 20 15.98 50 26 20.09 100 33 23.50 As can be seen from the above, the proposed detention basin provides complete attenuation of the peak flows from the site to levels at or below existing peak flow rates. Y � On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations: The storm sewer calculations for the storm piping within the proposed roadway are included in appendix E. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the rational-formula. Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated Detention/Water quality basin, will mitigate any potential water quality and quantity impacts from the development of the site. y APPENDIX A ( l RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Woods - grass combination good - 6.57 (58) - 0.69(79) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.57 .69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 60* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method F I TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest --------------------------------------------------------------------=---------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .129 i 0.296 Shallow Concent'd 300 .12 u 0.015 Shallow Concent'd 825 .026 u 0.088 , Time of Concentration = 0.40* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P-Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method K J J ! GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to northwest Data: Drainage Area 7.26 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 60 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area .69 Acres 9.5 % of Drainage Area ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Storm Number I 1 1 2 l 3 1 4 1 5 1 1----------------------1------1------I------1------1------1 I Frequency (yrs) 1 2 1 10 1 25 1 50 ( 100 1 I I f I 1 I 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 1 3.2 ! 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 1 6.9 I I I 1 I I I I Ia/P Ratio 1 0.42 1 0.28 1 0.24 1 0.22 1 0.19 1 I I I I I I I 1 Runoff (in) 10.41 ( 1.13 11.60 1 2.05 12.53 I I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.440 10.602 10.624 10.639 10.651 1 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Pond and Swamp Factorl 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1. 0.72 1 1 5.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------1------1------1------1------1 1 Peak Discharge (cfs) 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines + y RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to north ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 6.05(48) - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 6.05 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 48* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method { 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to north --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .036 j 0.115 Shallow Concent'd 200 .036 u 0.018 Shallow Concent'd 550 .04 u 0.047 Time of Concentration = 0.18* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method a GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: - Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to north Data: Drainage Area 6.05 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 48 * Time of Concentration: 0.18 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE { Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 1----------------------{------►------1------1------{------1 I Frequency (yrs) { 2 { 10 1 25 { 50 ( 100 l I I I I I I I { 24-Hr Rainfall (in) { 3.2 { 4.7 { 5.5 l 6.2 { 6.9 { I I I I I I I { Ia/P Ratio l 0.68 { 0.46 { 0.39 1 0.35 { 0.31 { { I I I I I I { Used { 0.50 { 0.46 10.39 l 0.35 1 0.31 I 1 I I I i I I { Runoff (in) l 0.09 l 0.48 { 0.78 1 1.09 { 1.44 { { I I I I I I { Unit Peak Discharge 10.392 10.465 10.623 10.713 10.769 1 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I l I I I I I I 1 Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 11.00 1 1.00 ( 1.00 { 1.00 { 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------{------i------{------1------1 { Peak Discharge (cfs) i 0 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 I * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines f RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDS Fallow Bare soil ---- - - - 1.9(94) OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 7.69 (48) - - Woods good - 8.0 (55) 3.71(70) - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 15.6 3.71 1.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 21.3 Acres ' WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 59* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * —Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 200 .075 f 0.244 Shallow Concent'd 200 .07 u 0.013 Open Channel 1100 2 0.153 Time of Concentration = 0.41* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing Conditions Discharge to south Data: Drainage Area 21.3 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 59 * Time of Concentration: 0.41 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE --------------------------- ----------- { Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5 1 i----------------------{------{------{------{------1------{ I Frequency (yrs) I 2 I 10 1 25 1 50 1 100 I I I I 1 I { 24-Hr Rainfall (in) i 3.2 I 4.7 { 5.5 I 6.2 { 6.9 { i I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 10.43 ► 0.30 { 0.25 { 0.22 { 0.20 I { I I I I I I { Runoff (in) { 0.37 1 1.07 i 1.53 { 1.97 { 2.44 I { I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.409 10.589 10.612 10.628 10.640 1 i (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I { I I I I I I 1 Pond and Swamp Factor{ 1.00 { 1.00 1 1.00 ( 1.00 { 1.00 I 1 0.0% Ponds Used I i I I I' I {----------------------1------1------1------1------i------I i Peak Discharge (cfs) I 3 { 13 1 20 1 26 I 33 I * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 75% - .75(61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .18 (98) - - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Woods - grass combination good - 5.64 (58) - 0.69(79) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 6.57 .69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 61* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .129 i 0.296 Shallow Concent'd 300 .12 u 0.015 Shallow Concent'd 825 .026 u 0.088 Time of Concentration = 0.40* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed Conditions Discharge to Northwest Data: Drainage Area 7.26 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 61 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area .69 Acres 9.5 % of Drainage Area Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5 1 1----------------------i------1------1------1------I------I i Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 I 50 I 100 I 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) ( 3.2 I 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 1 6.9 I I I I I I i I Ia/P Ratio 1 0.40 10.27 10.23 ( 0.21 10.19 1 I I I I I I I Runoff (in) 1 0.44 1 1.19 ( 1.68 12.14 i 2.63 I I I I I I I I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 10.467 10.608 10.630 10.644 10.655 1 1 (cfs/acre/in) I Pond and Swamp Factor) 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 0.72 1 1 5.0% Ponds Used I I I I I ' I 1----------------------1------1------i------1------1------1 1 Peak Discharge (cfs) i 1 1 4 1 6 1 7 1 9 I * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) Good condition; grass cover > 75% - 2.97 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .10(98) - - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - 2 (48) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 5.07 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 5.07 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 57* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 120 .036 g 0.334 Shallow Concent'd 200 .036 u 0.018 Shallow Concent'd 530 .04 u 0.046 Time of Concentration = 0.40* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ Barberhill Road User: GBS Date: 11-21-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions discharge to north Data: Drainage Area 5.07 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 57 * Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE ------------------ 1 Storm Number ( 1 ► 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 (----------------------1------(------(------(------(------I Frequency (yrs) ( 2 I 10 ( 25 I 50 I 100 ( I I I I I I 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 ( 4.7 1 5.5 ► 6.2 1 6.9 1 ( I I f I I I ( Ia/P Ratio ( 0.47 10.32 10.27 10.24 ( 0.22 I ( I I I I I I Runoff (in) 10.31 10.95 ( 1.38 11.80 ► 2.25 ( Unit Peak Discharge 10.358 10.568 10.607 10.624 10.637 1 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I ( Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 11.00 1 1.00 ( 1.00 11.00 I ( 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I' I (----------------------1------1------(------I------I------( I Peak Discharge (cfs) 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 6 1 7 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH Subarea : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Residential districts Avg % impery (by average lot size) 1 acre 20 - 17.1(68) 3.71(79) 1.9(84) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 17.1 3.71 1.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 22.71 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 71* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 100 .013 F 0.283 Shallow Concent'd 100 .013 U 0.015 Open Channel 800 2 0.111 Time of Concentration = 0.41* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : JJ BARBERHILL ROAD User: GBS Date: 11/28/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH Data: Drainage Area 22.71 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 71 * Time of Concentration: 0.41 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE ----------------- I Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 (----------------------(------(------1------1------1------1------I ( Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 I 50 1 100 ( 1 i ( 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 I 4.7 ( 5.5 ( 6.2 1 6.9 1 1.50 1 1 I I I I I i I I Ia/P Ratio 1 0.26 1 0.17 ( 0.15 ( 0.13 10.12 ( 0.54 1 Used 10.26 ( 0.17 10.15 i 0.13 1 0.12 10.50 I ( I I I I I I I I Runoff (in) 10.88 1 1.89 ( 2.50 ► 3.06 13.64 10.10 I . ( f I I I I I I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 10.611 10.655 10.669 10.678 10.685 10.316 1 ( (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I 1 Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1.00 ► 1.00 ( 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 ( 0.0% Ponds Used I I ! I I I I 1----------------------i------(------1------i------(------I------1 Peak Discharge (cfs) I 12 ► 28 I 38 1 47 1 57 I 1 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C Reservoir Report Page 1 Reservoir No. 1 - DETENT BASIN Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Pond Data Bottom LxW = 380.0 x 40.0 ft Side slope = 3,0:1 Bottom elev. = 308.00 ft Depth = 5.00 ft Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(it) Contour area(sgft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuff) 0.00 308.00 15,200 0 0 0.25 308.25 17,756 3,879 3,879 0.50 308.50 20,384 4,038 7,917 0.76 308.75 23,084 4,197 12,114 1.00 309.00 25,856 4,358 16,472 1.25 309.25 28,700 4,520 20,992 1.50 309.50 31,616 4,683 25,675 1.75 309.75 34,604 4,848 30,523 2.00 310.00 37,664 5,013 35,5W 2.25 310.25 40,796 5,179 40,715 2.50 310.50 44,000 5,347 46,062 2.75 310.75 47,276 5,516 51.578 3.00 311.00 50,624 5,686 57,264 3.25 311.25 54,044 5,857 63,121 3.50 311.50 57,536 6,029 69,149 3.75 311.75 61,100 6,202 75,352 4.00 312.00 64,736 6,376 81,728 4.25 312.25 68,444 6,552 88,280 4.50 312.50 72,224 6,729 95,008 4.75 312.75 76,076 6,906 101,915 5.00 313.00 80,000 7,085 109,000 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise In = 30.0 12.0 24.0 0.0 Crest Len ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span in = 30.0 12.0 24.0 0.0 Crest El.it = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 1 1 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert EIA = 308.30 308.30 309.50 0.00 Weir Type = - - - - Length it = 60.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope% = 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.00 N Value = .013 .013 .013 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.00 Multi-Stage = n/a Yes Yes No Extiltration Rate = 0.00 in/hr/sgft Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analysed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage/Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Civ B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total 1t tuft it cis cis cis cis cis cis efs cis cis cis 0.00 0 308.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.25 3,879 308.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.50 7,917 308.50 0.17 0.14 0.00 - - - - - - 0.14 0.75 12,114 308.75 0.72 0.66 0.00 - - - - - - 0.66 1.00 16,472 309.00 1.47 1.47 0.00 - - - - - - 1.47 1,25 20,992 309.25 2.30 2.30 0.00 - - - - - -- 2.30 1.50 25,675 309.50 2.96 2.83 0.00 - - - - - - 2.83 1.75 30,523 309.75 3.67 3.22 0.42 - - - - - - 3.64 2.00 35,536 310.00 5.13 3.36 1.53 - - - - - - 4.89 2.25 40,715 310.25 6.72 3.45 3.27 - - - -- - - 6.72 2.50 46,062 310.50 9.16 3.39 5.62 - - - - - - 9.00 2.75 51,578 310.75 11.42 3.31 8.02 - - - - - - 11.33 3.00 57,264 311.00 13.49 3.18 10.33 - - - - - 13.49 3.25 63,121 311.25 14.86 3.14 11.70 - - - - - - 14.84 3.50 69,149 311.50 15.58 3.12 12.46 - - - - - - '15.58 3.75 75,352 311.75 17.42 3.48 13.94 - - - - - - 17.42 4.00 81,728 312.00 19.09 3.82 15.27 - - - - - - 19.08 4.25 88,280 312.25 20.61 4.12 16.49 - - - - - - 20.61 4.50 95,008 312.50 22.04 4.41 17.63 - - - - - - 22.04 4.75 101,915 312.75 23.37 4.67 18.70 - - - - - - 23.37 5.00 109,000 313.00 24.64 4.93 19.71 - - - - - - 24.64 APPENDIX D Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maxkrnun Maxi num Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) lit) (cult) 1 SCS Runoff 12.22 6 744 70,294 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 2.94 6 792 65,572 1 309.54 26,456 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 2 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by intellsolve Hydrograph Report Pagel HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 12.22 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 3.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = .470 Hydrograph Volume=70,294 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs ds) 12.00 3.63 12.10 6.68 12.20 9.97 12.30 12.08 12.40 12.22<< 12.50 11.33 12.60 9.59 12.70 7.40 12.80 5.54 12.90 4.43 13.00 3.66 13.10 3.16 ...End Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff-2 Yr-Op = 12.22 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 15 10 CJ 5 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report Page Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.94 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 309.54 ft Max. Storage = 26,456 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=65,572 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EAU Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.40 12.22<< 308.90 1.12 1.12 -- --- ----- ---- --- ---- ---- 1.12 12.50 11.33 309.11 1.88 1.83 ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 1.83 12.60 9.59 309.28 2.38 2.35 ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- 2.35 12.70 7.40 309.39 2.63 2.63 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 2.63 12.80 5.54 309.47 2.96 2.75 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.75 12.90 4.43 309.51 2.96 2.85 0.00 -__ _____ ___ ___- _____ ____ 2.85 13.00 3.66 309.53 2.96 2.90 0.01 -- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.91 13.10 3.16 309.54 2.96 2.92 0.01 --- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2.94 13.20 2.87 309.54 << 2.96 2.92 0.02 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 2.94<< 13.30 2.67 309.54 2.96 2.92 0.01 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- 2.93 13.40 2.52 309.53 2.96 2.91 0.01 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 2.92 13.50 2.41 309.52 2.96 2.89 0.00 ----_ _-__ ____ _____ ____ _-_ 2.89 13.60 2.32 309.51 2.96 2.86 0.00 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- 2.87 13.70 2.25 309.50 2.96 2.84 0.00 ---- --- ---- ---- ---_ ----_ 2.84 13.80 2.18 309.49 2.96 2.81 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- --- 2.81 13.90 2.11 309.48 2.96 2.78 --- ----- ----- ---- --- -- ---- 2.78 14.00 2.03 309.47 2.96 2.74 ----- ---- ____ ____ ___ __.- _____ 2.74 14.10 1.96 309.45 2.96 2.71 ---- ---- -- ---- ----- ----- ---- 2.71 14.20 1.89 309.44 2.80 2.68 ----- --- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 2.68 14.30 1.83 309.42 2.67 2.66 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- --- 2.66 14.40 1.78 309.40 2.65 2.65 ---- ----- ___ __� ____ _-_ ____ 2.65 14.50 1.74 309.39 2.63 2.63 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- 2.63 14.60 1.70 309.37 2.61 2.60 --- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 2.60 14.70 1.66 309.35 2.61 2.55 ---- ----- ---- --- ---- ---- ----- 2.55 14.80 1.63 309.34 2.61 2.51 ---- ---- __- _____ ____ ____ _____ 2.51 14.90 1.59 309.32 2.61 2.46 ---_ ____ _M ____ _____ _____ ___ 2.46 15.00 1.55 309.30 2.61 2.41 ____ _____ _____ 2.41 15.10 1.51 309.29 2.47 2.37 ----_ _____ _� _-_ _____ ___ _____ 2.37 15.20 1.48 309.27 2.34 2.34 --- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.34 15.30 1.44 309.25 2.31 2.31 -- ----- --- ____ _____ ___- _____ 2.31 15.40 1.40 309.24 2.29 2.26 ----- ----- ---- ----- -- ____ ____ 2.26 15.50 1.36 309.22 2.28 2.20 ---__ ___ ___ ____ ___ _____ __� 2.20 15.60 1.32 309.20 2.28 2.13 ----- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- ---- 2.13 15.70 1.28 309.19 2.16 2.07 ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---- 2.07 15.80 1.24 309.17 2.03 2.03 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 2.03 15.90 1.20 309.16 2.00 2.00 ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- --- ---- 2.00 16.60 1.16 309.14 1.99 1.95 ----- ----- ---- --- --- ----- ----- 1.95 16.10 1.11 309.12 1.98 1.88 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 1.88 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.20 1.08 309.11 1.85 1.81 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 1.81 16.30 1.04 309.09 1.76 1.76 ---_ -_-- ----- -.__ w_ ____ -__ 1.78 16.40 1.02 309.08 1.73 1.73 ----- -- ----- ----_ ____ ___ �- 1.73 16.50 0.99 309.07 1.72 1.68 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- 1.68 16.60 0.97 309.05 1.71 1.63 1.63 16.70 0.95 309.04 1.64 1.58 --- 1.58 16.80 0.94 309.03 1.54 1.52 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 1.52 16,90 0.92 309.02 1.50 1.50 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.50 17.00 0.90 309.01 1.48 1.48 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.48 17.10 0.88 308.99 1.47 1.44 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- 1.44 17.20 0.86 308.98 1.47 1.39 ----- ----- ----- -- ----- ----- ---- 1.39 17.30 0.84 308.97 1.44 1.35 ----- ---- --- ----- ----- ---- ----- 1.35 17.40 0.83 308.96 1.36 1.31 ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---- 1.31 17.50 0.81 308.95 1.28 1.28 ----_ ---- ----- ----- --- ---- ---- 1.28 17.60 0.79 308.94 1.26 1.25 ---- -- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.25 17.70 0.77 308.93 1.25 1.22 ---- ----- ----- ---- __w ___ ----- 1.22 17.80 0.75 308.92 1.24 1.19 ---- --- ----- ---- ---- --- ----- 1.19 17.90 0.73 308.91 1.19 1.16 ----- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- ----- 1.16 18.00 0.71 308.91 1.13 1.12 ----- _---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 1.12 18.10 0.69 308.90 1.09 1.09 ----- ----- ----- --__ ___ _____ _____ 1.09 18.20 0.68 308.89 1.08 1.07 ---- --- ---- --- ----- ---- ----- 1.07 18.30 0.66 308.88 1.06 1.05 ---- ----- ----- =-- ----- ---- ----- 1.05 18.40 0.85 308.87 1.05 1.03 --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.03 18.50 0.64 308.87 1.05 1.00 ----- ----- -_- -- ---- M__ _____ 1.00 18.60 0.64 308.86 1.05 0.97 ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.97 18.70 0.63 308.85 1.05 0.94 ----- ----- ----- ---- --- ----- ----- 0•94 18.80 0.62 308.85 1.02 0.92 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.92 18.90 0.62 308.84 0.98 0.91 ----- -- -- ---- ---- ____ ____ 0.91 19.00 0.61 308.83 0.94 0.90 ---- ----- --- ----- ____ ___ ____ 0.90 19.10 0.61 308.83 0.91 0.89 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- --- 0.89 19.20 0.60 308.82 0.89 0.88 0.88 19.30 0.60 308.82 0.88 0.86 0.86 19.40 0.59 308.81 0.88 0.85 ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- ----- 0.85 19.50 0.59 308.81 0.88 0.83 --- -- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- 0.83 19.60 0.58 308.80 0.88 0.82 0.82 19.70 0.57 308.80 0.85 0.80 ---- ---- ----- ----- --- ---- ----- 0.80 19.80 0.57 308.79 0.83 0.79 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- --- 0.79 19.90 0.56 308.79 0.80 0.77. ---- -- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- 0.77 20.00 0.56 308.78 0.78 0.76 ----- --- ----- -- ---- ----- ----- 0.76 20.10 0.55 308.78 0.75 0.74 ----- ----- ---__ _____ -__ _-__ _____ 0.74 ...End Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir -2 Yr- Qp = 2.94 efs - 15 10 C1 5 0 0.00 4.08 8.16 12.24 16.32 20.40 24.48 28.56 32.64 36.72 40.80 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Tune Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (tt) (cult) 1 SCS Runoff 28.43 6 738 151,497 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 12.31 6 768 146,774 1 310.84 53,684 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 10 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 28.43 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 4.70 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=15t.497 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 12.00 11.14 12.10 17.97 12.20 24.80 12.30 28.43<< 12.40 27.65 12.50 24.80 12.60 20.39 12.70 15.29 12.80 11.21 12.90 8.86 13.00 7.25 ...End Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff- 10 Yr - Op = 28.43 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 30 25 20 � 15 10 5 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.31 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 310.84 ft Max. Storage = 53,684 cult storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=146,774 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D - Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.30 28.43<< 309.81 4.02 3.24 0.63 ---- ---_ _-_ _____ _____ _____ 3.87 12.40 27.85 310.21 6.72 3.40 2.97 ---_ ---- -_- -___ ___ ____ 6.36 12.50 24.80 310.52 9.16 3.43 5.68 ---- ----- ----- ----- --_- ----- 9.11 12.60 20.39 310.73 11.09 3.36 7.68 --- --- __-_ ___ ___ ____ 11.03 12.70 15.29 310.83 12.10 3.27 8.83 ----- ----- ----- ---_ ____ _____ 12.10 12.80 11.21 310.84<< 12.31 3.25 9.06 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 12.31 « 12.90 8.86 310.81 11.89 3.29 8.60 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.89 13.00 7.25 310.75 11.47 3.31 8.07 --__ w__ ___ ____ ____ M-- 11.37 13.10 6.24 310.68 10.83 3.34 7.35 ---- ---- ----- -__ _w_ _M_ 10.68 13.20 5.62 310.61 10.13 3.37 6.61 ----- -_- ____ ____ __-_ ____ 9.98 13.30 5.22 310.54 9.44 3.41 5.93 ---- ----- ____ __-_ ___ ____ 9.33 13.40 4.91 310.48 8.79 3.43 5.31 ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- 8.74 13.50 4.68 310.42 8.35 3.42 4.76 ----- ----- ---- ----- __- ---- 8.18 13.60 4.49 310.36 7.95 3.40 4.22 ---- ____ ____ _�_ �__ __-- 7.62 13.70 4.34 310.31 7.28 3.46 3.71 --- ---- ----- ----- ---- 7.18 13.80 4.19 310.26 6.93 3.44 3.41 - ----- __-_ ____ ____ ____ 6_85 13.90 4.05 310.22 6.72 3.42 2.99 ----- -_- --- --_- ____ _____ 6.41 14.00 3.90 310.18 6.39 3.42 2.74 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.16 14.10 3.75 310.14 5.91 3.45 2.43 5.88 14.20 3.61 310.11 5.91 3.38 2.23 ----- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 5.61 14.30 3.49 310.07 5.52 3.41 1.95 ----- --- ----- --- ----- 5.37 14.40 3.39 310.04 5.36 3.38 1.84 --__ ____ -__ .___ _____ ___ 5.22 14.50 3.30 310.01 5.13 3.38 1.60 ---- ----- ----- ----- ___ w_ 4•98 14.60 3.22 309.98 4.83 3.39 1.39 ---- ----- -_- --_ ___ _____ 4.78 14.70 3.14 309.95 4.75 3.36 1.32 ----- ----- ----- _--- ----- 4.68 14.80 3.07 309.93 4.75 3.30 1.18 -- ---_ ---- ----- ----- ----- 4.47 14.90 3.00 309.90 4.41 3.34 1.02 ---- -- --_ _�_ _w _---- 4.36 15.00 2.92 309.88 4.38 3.30 0.89 4.19 15.10 2.85 309.86 4.11 3.28 0. 78 4.05, 15.20 2.77 309.83 4.02 3.28 0.73 ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 4.01 15.30 2.70 309.81 4.02 3.25 0.66 ---- ----_ ___ _____ _ ___ __- 3.92 15.40 2.62 309.79 4.02 3.21 0.57 --- -- --- ----- ---- --- 3.78 15.50 2.54 309.77 3.95 3.18 0.49 ---- --- --- ---- ----- 3.67 15.60 2.47 309.75 3.67 3.22 0.42 ----- ---- ---_ ____ -w ___ 3.64 15.70 2.39 309.73 3.67 3.17 0.38 ----- ---- ----- ---- --- --__ 3.52 15.80 2.31 309.71 3.67 3.12 0.30 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 3.42 15.90 2.23 309.69 3.49 3.11 0.25 ---- ---- ----- --- -___ _____ 3.36 16.00 2.15 309.67 3.33 3.11 0.20 ----- ---- ___- _� _____ _�_ 3.31 Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs Cfs 16.10 2.07 309.64 3.33 3.08 0.15 ----- 3.23 16.20 2.00 309.62 3.33 3.03 0.10 ----- •-- ____ _____ ____ ____ 3.13 ...End Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir- 10 Yr -Op = 12.31 cfs - 30 25 20 CY 15 10 5 0 0.0 3.2 6.4 9.6 12.8 15.9 19.1 22.3 25.5 28.7 31.9 Time(hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow Interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (CUM 1 SCS Runoff 38.13 6 738 200,245 — — — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 15.98 6 768 195,522 1 311.55 70,422 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 25 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hydrograph Report Pam, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 38.13 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 5.50 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=2W,245 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.90 9.68 12.00 15.82 12.10 24.85 12.20 33.71 12.30 38.13<< 12.40 36.71 12.50 32.64 12.60 26.63 12.70 19.80 12.80 14.43 12.90 11.36 ...End Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff- 25 Yr - Qp = 38.13 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 40 30 Cy 20 10 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report Pagel Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 15.98 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 311.55 ft Max. Storage = 70,422 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=195,522 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exrtl Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs efs cfs efs cfs efs cfs cfs efs cfs 12.20 33.71 309.92 4.68 3.31 1.13 --_ ____ _�_ �_ _____ _____ 4.43 12.30 38.13<< 310.43 8.35 3.43 4.90 --- ____ _-_ -__ _____ ----- 8.33 12.40 36.71 310.87 12.64 3.20 9.23 ----- ----- ____ ___ ____ ___ 12.44 12.50 32.64 311.20 14.62 3.15 11.46 -- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- 14.62 12.60 26.63 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- --- 15.21 12.70 19.80 311.53 15.84 3.17 12.67 --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- 15.84 12.80 14.43 311.55<< 15.98 3.20 12.78 ----- --_ _-- 15.98 << 12.90 11.36 311.51 15.65 3.13 12.52 ---- _---- ____ ____ _____ ___ 15.65 13.00 9.28 311.36 15.19 3.10 12.08 ----- ----- =--- ---- ----- ----- 15.19 13.10 7.96 311.34 15.12 3.12 12.01 ---- ---- ---- --- ----- ----- 15.12 13.20 7.17 311.22 14.75 3.15 11.60 -__ ___ __-- ----- ___- ----- 14.75 13.30 6.65 311.11 14.20 3.16 11.02 ----- ----- ----- ___ ____ ____ 14.17 13.40 6.25 311.00 13.45 3.16 10.29 --- ----- ----- --- _w_ _-_ 13.45 13.50 5.95 310.89 12.83 3.18 9.40 ---- ----- ---- ----- ---_ ----- 12.58 13.60 5.71 310.79 11.76 3.28 8.41 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- -- 11.70 13.70 5.51 310.70 11.00 3.31 7.52 10.83 13.80 5.32 310.61 10.16 3.37 6.64 10.01 13.90 5.13 310.54 9.42 3.41 5.91 ---- ----- ----- ____ ____ ___ 9.32 14.00 4.94 310.48 8.77 3.44 5.29 ----- ---- ----- ____ ____ ___ 8.72 14.10 4.75 310.41 8.35 3.41 4.76 ---- --- ---- --- ---- ----- 8.17 14.20 4.57 310.36 7.95 3.40 4.22 ---- _-__ __ ____ -� ____ 7.62 14.30 4.41 310.31 7.31 3.46 3.73 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- 7.19 14.40 4.28 310.27 6.98 3.44 3.45 ----- ---- ----- ---_ ____ ___ 6.88 14.50 4.17 310.22 6.72 3.43 3.00 ----- ----- ---- ----- ____ ___ 6.42 14.80 4.06 310.19 6.49 3.40 2.80 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 6.21 14.70 3.97 310.15 5.92 3.46 2.45 --- -- ----- ----- --- ---- 5.91 14.80 3.87 310.12 5.91 3.41 2.33 5.74 14.90 3.78 310.09 5.70 3.39 2.06 ---- ---- ----- ----- -___ _M_ 5.45 15.00 3.68 310.06 5.52 3.38 1.93 -- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5.31 15.10 3.59 310.03 5.21 3.40 1.76 - ---- ---- ___ ____ ____ 5.16 15.20 3.49 310.00 5.13 3.37 1.56 4.92 15.30 3.40 309.98 4.81 3.39 1.38 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- 4.77 15.40 3.30 309.95 4.75 3.36 1.32 ----- ----- ----_ ____ ___ ____ 4.68 15.50 3.20 309.93 4.75 3.31 1.19 ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- 4.50 15.60 3.10 309.91 4.48 3.33 1.05 ---- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- 4.38 15.70 3.00 309.88 4.38 3.31 0.92 -__ ____ ____ ____ ___ _____ 4.23 15.80 2.90 309.86 4.20 3.28 0.81 ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- 4.09 15.90 2.80 309.84 4.02 3.27 0.74 ---- ----- ----- -_- ---- ----- 4.01 Continues on next page... Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir- 25 Yr- Qp = 15.98 cfs - 40 30 ac 20 10 0 0.0 3.1 6.2 9.4 12.5 15.6 18.7 21.8 25.0 28.1 31.2 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Tine to Volume Inflow Maximrin Maxirman Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (rran) (Cuff) (ft) (Cuff) 1 SCS Runoff 46.97 6 738 245,019 -- — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 20.09 '6 768 240,295 1 312.16 86,003 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 50 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 46.97 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 6.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=245,019 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time --Outflow (hrs ds) 11.90 12.57 12.00 20.17 12.10 31.20 12.20 41.87 12.30 46.97<< 12.40 44.92 12.50 39.72 12.60 32.24 12.70 23.84 12.80 17.31 12.90 13.60 ...End Hyd. No. 1 -SCS Runoff- 50 Yr- Op =46.97 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 50 40 � 30 CI 20 10 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.8 12.2 14.6 17.1 19.5 22.0 24.4 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 20.09 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 312.16 ft Max. Storage = 86,003 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=240,20 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D EMI Outflow (hrs) efs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs efs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.20 41.87 310.38 8.05 3.42 4.34 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.76 12.30 46.97<< 310.93 13.08 3.16 9.85 ----- ---- ---- ---- ____ _____ 13.01 12.40 44.92 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 15.21 12.50 39.72 311.80 17.74 3.55 14.19 ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 17.74 12.60 32.24 312.04 19.35 3.87 15.48 ----- ---- ___ ___ _�_ ___ 19.35 12.70 23.84 312.16 20.05 4.01 16.04 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- 20.05 12.80 17.31 312.16<< 20.10 4.02 16.07 ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- 20.09<< 12.90 13.60 312.10 19.72 3.94 15.78 ---- -_-- �__ ____ M__ ___ 19.72 13.00 11.09 312.00 19.12 3.82 15.29 ----- -_-__ ___ ____ ____ ____ 19.11 13.10 9.50 311.89 18.34 3.67 14.67 -- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- 18.34 13.20 8.55 311.76 17.49 3.50 13.99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 17.49 13.30 7.92 311.63 16.59 3.32 13.27 ----- ---- ---- ____ ___ ____ 16.58 13.40 7.44 311.51 15.66 3.13 12.53 ----- ----- ___ ___ �__ ____ 15.66 13.50 7.07 311.39 15.22 3.09 12.13 ---- ---- ----- --_ ____ ____ 15.22 13.60 6.78 311.27 14.93 3.13 11.77 ---- ----- --- --- ----- ---- 14.90 13.70 6.54 311.15 14.45 3.13 11.18 --- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 14.30 13.80 6.32 311.03 13.73 3.16 10.56 -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 13.73 13.90 6.09 310.92 12.98 3.15 9.75 --- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- 12.91 14.00 5.86 310.82 11.96 3.29 8.68 ----- ---- -- ----- ---- ----- 11.96 14.10 5.63 310.72 11.07 3.35 7.66 ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- 11.01 14.20 5.42 310.64 10.33 3.38 6.84 ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 10.22 14.30 5.23 310.57 9.56 3.43 6.07 - ----_ __-_ _____ ____ ____ 9.50 14.40 5.07 310.50 9.16 3.39 5.61 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ----- 9.00 14.50 4.93 310.44 8.35 3.42 4.92 ----- ----- ----- ___ ___ ____ 8.84 14.60 4.81 310.38 8.10 3.42 4.37 ---- ---- -_--- ----- ----- ____ 7.79. 14.70 4.70 310.34 7.72 3.41 4.03 --- --__ ___ w__ ___ ___ 7.44 14.80 4.58 310.29 7.13 3.47 3.59 7.05 14.90 4.47 310.25 6.76 3.45 3.29 ----- ____ -- _____ ___ �_ 6.74 15.00 4.36 310.22 6.72 3.41 2.98 6.39 15.10 4.24 310.18 6.41 3.41 2.75 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- 6.17 15.20 4.13 310.15 5.91 3.46 2.45 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5.91 15.30 4.01 310.12 5.91 3.41 2.34 ---_ ____ ___ _w _____ _�_ 5.75 15.40 3.90 310.09 5.74 3.39 2.08 ----- --- ---- ---- ----- --- 5.47 15.50 3.78 310.06 5.52 3.39 1.94 ----- ----- __- ----- _-_ ____ 5.33 15.60 3.66 310.04 5.29 3.39 1.80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 5.19 ...End Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir- 50 Yr- Qp = 20.09 cfs - 50 40 30 at 20 10 0 0.00 3.03 6.06 9.09 12.12 15.15 18.18 21.21 24.24 27.27 30.30 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 f Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Trne Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Max6num Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (it) (curt) 1 SCS Runoff 56.04 6 738 291,345 — DEVELOPED TO BASIN 2 Reservoir 23.50 6 768 286,621 1 312.78 102,636 Proj. file: 1430.gpw Return Period: 100 yr Run date: 12-04-2001 Hydraftow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Pam, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 DEVELOPED TO BASIN Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 56.04 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 22.71 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 24.6 min Total precip. = 6.90 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 470 Hydrograph Volume=M,W cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.90 15.61 12.00 24.72 12.10 37.78 12.20 50.29 12.30 56.04<< 12.40 53.33 12.50 46.94 12.60 37.94 12.70 27.94 12.80 20.22 12.90 15.86 ...End Hyd. No. 1 - SCS Runoff- 100 Yr - Qp = 56.04 cfs - DEVELOPED TO BASIN 60 50 40 tl 30 20 10 0 0.0 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.7 12.1 14.6 17.0 19.4 21.9 24.3 Time (hrs) / Hyd. 1 Hydrograph Report page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 23.50 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Reservoir name = DETENT BASIN Max. Elevation = 312.78 ft Max. Storage = 102,636 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=286,621 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Ell Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.10 37.78 310.23 6.72 3.44 3.09 6.52 12.20 50.29 310.81 11.87 3.29 8.58 ----- --- ----- ---- -__ ____ 11.87 12.30 56.04<< 311.38 15.22 3.09 12.12 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 15.22 12.40 53.33 311.96 18.83 3.77 15.07 ---- ----_ ---- ---- ---- ----- 18.83 12.50 46.94 312.37 21.32 4.26 17.05 --- ----- -- ---- ---- ---- 21.32 12.60 37.94 312.64 22.80 4.56 18.24 --- ----- -- ---- ---- --- 22.80 12.70 27.94 312.77 23.47 4.69 18.77 -- ----- ____ _____ _____ -__-- 23.46 12.80 20.22 312.78<< 23.51 4.70 18.80 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- -- 23.50<< 12.90 15.86 312.71 23.15 4.63 18.52 23.15 13.00 12.91 312.60 22.56 4.51 18.05 ----- ----- ---- -- ----- - 22.56 13.10 11.06 312.46 21.83 4.37 17.46 ----- ---- ----- M__ ____ _-_ 21.83 13.20 9.94 312.32 21.00 4.20 16.80 ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- 21.00 13.30 9.21 312.17 20.12 4.02 16.10 - ---- --- --•- ----- --- 20.12 13.40 8.64 312.02 19.21 3.84 15.37 ----- ----- ----- --- ---- ---- 19.21 13.50 8.21 311.88 18.27 3.65 14.62 ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- 18.27 13.60 7.87 311.74 17.33 3.47 13.86 17.33 13.70 7.59 311.60 16.38 3.28 13.10 ----- ----- --_ __� -M �__ 16.38 13.80 7.32 311.48 15.43 3.09 12.34 -- -- --- --- ----- ----- 15.43 13.90 7.06 311.36 15.18 3.11 12.07 -- ----- ----- ----- ----- -- 15.18 14.00 6.79 311.24 14.82 3.14 11.66 14.80 14.10 6.52 311.12 14.27 3.15 11.06 -- --- ----- ---- ---- ---- 14.21 14.20 6.27 311.00 13.53 3.16 10.37 ----- ----- ----- ----- -- ----- 13.53 14.30 8.05 310.89 12.92 3.16 9.51 ----- ---- ---- --- ----- ---- 12.67 14.40 5.87 310.80 11.76 3.30 8.44 ----- ---- ----- -- --- ---- 11.74 14.50 5.71 310.71 11.07 3.32 7.60 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- 10.92 14.60 5.56 310.63 10.33 3.35 6.80 ----- - ----- ---- ---- ----- 10.15 14.70 5.43 310.56 9.56 3.40 6.04 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- 9.45 14.80 5.30 310.49 9.06 3.40 5.53 -- ----- ---- --- ---- ----- 8.93 14.90 5.17 310.44 8.35 3.42 4.92 ---- ----- ---_ __- ___- -___ 8.34 15.00 5.03 310.39 8.13 3.41 4.40 -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- 7.81 15.10 4.90 310.34 7.80 3.40 4.09 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 7.49 15.20 4.77 310.30 7.13 3.48 3.60 7.08 15.30 4.63 310.26 6.91 3.44 3.40 ----- -_- --- _____ _-_ _____ 6.84 15.40 4.50 310.23 6.72 3.43 3.01 6.44 15.50 4.36 310.19 6.60 3.39 2.87 ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 6.26 15.60 4.22 310.16 6.08 3.45 2.55 ----- - ---- -- ---- _--- 6.00 ...End 3 " Hyd. No. 2 - Reservoir - 100 Yr-Op = 23.50 efs - 60 50 40 � 30 20 10 0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 14.9 17.9 20.9 23.9 26.9 29.9 Time (hm) / Hyd. 1 / Hyd. 2 APPENDIX E STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: J ac ,.e s - Bsrbw �� Sheet No.: Project Number: l43o Design By: aft Description: C 6 'S Check By: w w z � w 0. zQ zw z OLUV � w ww �-JO w w Q = o: �LL UJ w writ Zu� z g ►Q- zv 0z 0O a � fir. � a � � w � _ � E z � r Lu � tz -J rz UZ rJQ zm z � � X � a � Z U. � � t'n � oQ LL U. Q _ Qo C g 1 S.S 0.03 0.6% 0.o2o 0.020 0.020 �.L 0.ILI O.o3o o.o;l 0.06 2, o 6,ol o,0o3 o,ot-� cB to IZ.S o.ly o,( l 0.085 0,085 0.08.�- N.K 0.3lq 0.o2S o.031 0.10 3,Z D,o�l 0,601 0 04b C&9 8.S o,Zg o.ys o.Izo o.IzL 0. s S•3 0,-- r 0.030 0,031 Z ?.8 0.13 6,025 I0. ilo c g� lo.� 0.�8 o.sZ- o.lgg o.198 o.u3 �1. i.oS o,o3z o,031 o,ly y.S o,z8 o.nS9 b.16N CBS .S o.S3 o.`I`1 0.�0 o,i�o 0.31 S '� I.� Z o.o 0.031 0.18 S�1 0.61 0. lt3 a,zaG Cg3 o.yo o.�r o.zgH 0,2.gq 0,3co CABarry\Gutter Flow SheM.xls STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: 1ac7 Sheet No.:_Z/y Project Number: IN3o Design By: ��E Description: C Check By: w �w � odw ~ � ?Q zr` w LL w �I Up w w w 7 ru z O i O w O z O w w -j U z z �►v- U. � ¢ C Q 1 0,03 0'9t) O,OZI O.QZI 0.0V 6.2_ 0,130 ,0YJ 0,0�1' 6.66, 2,0 0.0 Z 0,603 0.0/, �6 21 s 6,08 0,28 0.6% 0.03o o,or�n (,.2. o,V 0,c2 0,631 0.10 3.2- o.o4 6.000 o.oCy 6619 p,2( o,S°I o.12H ojzH o.13o 3.9 0.49N ooz3 0,o3j 0.(1 3.9 0,09 0.62`f o.►a6 G6 I 12•S o.2S O,S� p INS 0.14�, 6,1 C-1- y,q 0.-+35- 0.023 0,63, 0.1,> N.o 6. 1-�- o,12g (8 $ 9.5- 0-)q 0.48 0,011 16.691 0,60 1s.3 0,690 0.030 6.031 0.I2, 3 o,/ 0,02� ©•�o 0.33- o.Yy 0.181 0,i81 0.7-0(. y 0,93� 0.030 0,03i 0.1� q.0 0.1� 0.0g0 o. /66 C3 ul 1 I ON(, O.SN 0.zyg O.2yy p.2g8 N.S� 1.30 CABarry\Gutter Flaw Sheet.As STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: Sheet No.: 3 y Project Number: 1130 Design By: /.SEC Description: Check By: U) w �.: � d O_J — = z O z w w o z ., U � o U- w F- O zcQn _Z WU U Q U J � c7 WU U. W — z ►- O w Q z C1 tj Lu -� o O I- a a H U Q Q U- J Q J W V? Z = riles Writ QQt�i z 2 Fa- ZU pz 00 a � p 0 m � WFU- z ( z QQ wV Q (n O � Z LL � � V1U - OQ tJi � U. Qz QU CQ 10 il.s 0.6 o,SO 0345 0.3' .S 1,5- 0.023 O.o31 04 S.S 0.50 0, 111 0.2�q C13 18 2 0A 0.41 0.1$q aItq 37- o.0�3 0.031 0,1-a S 0 0.45 0, 1oz- 0.198 0.3N 0.v 10.1�3 6,(C3 573 0,34y 0C)2S 0,03 O.Iy N,Z 6.26 0,03E 0. 125" 66 12.5 o.98 b,`(� rj. I 0, 0,601 Y,y 216y CABarry\Gutter Flow Sheet.xls STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: �o� S ��4*�� !� Sheet No.:� Project Number: /y3o Design By: �c=E Description: G6 Check By: ., w c^n w � a _J z z zQQ w w p z U � ~ m � Zz Q Q C a h- Jw 2 - � = c, o qz ° o z _ w z w � otz ° >- Z � Z wQ Q i� Q cn F- LL G u. F- C� cn U 0 Q lL .� U. m _ Q _ Q U Cg 13 1 O.-So O.SO 0,150 O.ISO O,ISU N.S^ 0,6 0.034 0 o3t 0 2 0, 0. IZ3 Cl� �S G.S o, �- o•S9 0.21 o.Zlg o.24 �"6 1.3� CAS )2, 10 0,01 OIL 0.0d 0 o a.oy8 N,- 0.0 .031 0.08 2.`f! 0-oZ 0.00q o.oyy p 65' wo CABarry\Gutter Flaw Sheet.xls ` y 1(0I(G4 No MC LCILCS RGC 't< No. : 11130 24 Q — 3 Pd d Qs;�k ca = 4,Yt "War IMNM -nocd;j w;dkl, _ -4.S PryK 3 A. ca = v4 n.o K 6.�f �a� f�o) X T.S, r, 0.23 / Q = 2.o2 cis Z�N82r) o.Z4 N.(r, • �au61e t_Q � _ �? O.G� _ � 1.`!2 c�5 ` I ►S 1 = ��+iL� 1�,s,1. �c.�,..e-�-e- (C,cc lade c.✓b s��e �G,jT�. J ^pax � s � /VG • �du6�e CB � - 2.6y C$ Iq Q _ O-4Z-4 5 3 (u. z� l - 6.13 o G log, CJ A o.a3tzs y Z o.k, 021 0. 0 312 STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN Project Name: s ?P,I��r A Sheet No.: J/-2- Project Number: /Y30 Design By: /3cq Description: Check By: w w _w � z _ z z ^ wX O Z0) U W O ZZsS � szS Q ¢ U- Wm LL _J1 = Cl � N (n w OOri �11 � Q � 1- C C Z = O � W co Nw -J W W W W W > W Z W Z = W = W W W W � ^ zw m -J Mo. O2 � o: � = Ua : U O � "- n. Z aw a. � �j � av Pz PFL c9 �-- c� ¢ crU QU cnz � ? u_ z � Q. c a a .. Q .. a .. _ .. c yl - C6� I$ - ►8 -2,q 0. :8 0.9 o.9N� 3-� 3.50 is" 90' D.oOS C�3 -CQy (0 18.39 I�.3q - D.36o 1,31 N.g� /S" 23' o,00S q,5 0.0q- Z o.los 1,5" 23 0,01 S3 " Cn - c¢N S S•;� S - - o.o�� O.o3N 6.2 0, 211 is" 272 0.0Z 4.S 70 " C Qu- cgs 1 I /8.H Ia.�S -- - o. g 1•�3 3.� �.oy lS " �8 r�.00 y 3 7.y �N C��N- G6is 13 - �3 0. 169 ©jo .3 0, n- /S" Lis' 0.005- CBi cBi 6.S 13.Zo G.S- 0.2yS- 2.32- rS //Z o.ao!�- 3.3 V. CdIZ - c6�3 to - to - oti4 o.o`i�l �I,� 0.20� IS" 23 o.eoIS .2 CEI-S Zii II 6.99 6.99 - - 0.iD o.bo8 Sy 3.28 /S" 113' 0.6o5- 3,V yG CQio - c9/1 12,5 - 12.E - o.G-4G O,G-4Cti q,q o.3,y 1S'' Z..j' O.o( 5.3 C3 -4.$N -,zq - - o.I2-5 o,Yol S_3 U.29 IS` 1q3� o,ao� 3.8 N. CQR - C3Il 8.s 8.S - - 6.I10 O.Iio S,3 0.5$3 /S` .01 5.3 0.20 o.`II 0.6g2 d.obz S 0.959 IS" STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN M Project Name: T 41. f S - ;4/( Sheet No.: 2- Project Number: /113o Design By: /3<< Description: Check By: LL co w Oz � � u�JOU ZQz ¢ �z w -- z w _ CJnL. O L _ z d53 m JU� wz wZ ¢ p av ui o � ww LU v LU w \ wz0 � � � ? UQ� u^= 29 :n z n nU) F- 0 < z (L . ^ _ Q aU = v c yq- 6610 1�.5 _ /3.� 0.79 o.y3 0.y2,l 0. 21 �1. 3 /.8/ IS.. 3F ` O.00s' 3_B y.� GQzo-c9zi ii. i�.6;1 — — 0,23`1 0.�s�7 y.3 7,3` o.00s 3,2 y6 N� Y3- c919 /d. lo.s 0.0 0.3$ 6.1H3 o.2.y3 y. LIN /S" C4 18 -(0 )Z 10.C, 3 6,4N1 l/.7 7,61 /S T y b 19 - ou+ i.z� y. l S2 �S ' 3�0` b.oN3 6VT -66S i2,f 8.�9 $.�9 o.�zg i. 3 S 3 9. /6 /vt oozy 8.Z /o.o CZ-4 -c38 10.5 /o.S — _. D,16`f o.l6N N 0.7p ��,�. 2-3, 0.06f 3.8 V,6 M -o3� 8.� 9.4 9.0$ — D.loj 2.00 S,0 /0,00 )g� ziz� Oo� y ,? >3;0 C36- /3.5- 9,56 9.5� — 0,166 y,oa y� /8. /$ 300' QooS s2- 16.0 Tril flow A � fc� ie.� �'Y = Z`f O/ c�S STORM SEWER GUTTER ANALYSIS Project Name: Sheet No.:_3 y Project Number: 1430 (( Design By: Description; CB 1� — Spy �e7 Check By: w " U. ra w Ori x z OZ w w w z ., a. U- I— z — uJ t7q Writ � u� z = z zv 0 - DO wU 0 � 0 m � w ¢ D U a O aaZ .30 a � xix H - � ..J >- Z UZ U 90 P9 oQ wv Q !n E- dc. LL O � cn0 oQ u. .,, u. m _ Q _ aU CQ 10 I .S 0.6 D,SO 0.g`IS 0.3'IS 0.34j N.S I.SS 0023 Doll o i8 S� O.SO D, III 0.23`� c6 i8 2 0AI 6.4(0 0.IS9 0,1%9 0.300 0.199 Cg II $ 0.3�1 0.4g D.ISo3 0.1�3 0.1`3 S3 0.86y Oo2S o.03 O.1�I 4.Z 0.�i O,o38 0. 125 CABarry\Gutter Flow Sheet.xls � l . VINTAGE HILLS SUBDIVISION I''`t� S f I U1A 1 PLANNING COMMENTS Zoning Data Table Map should reflect how the open space requirement is going to be m-- '--' Key Ma , Barber Hill Road should be identified to help locate the property Plot Plan (Zti fly - G1:1T�� Street tree easement must be shown General Comments 1. Landscaping plan must be conform to the landscaping requirements of the subdivision regulations (Trees must be in street tree easement) 2. Existing drainage problem on Barber Hill Road in vicinity of subdivision needs to be addressed. 3. Sidewalks? Should be shown on both sides of streets. 4. Both cul-de-sacs should be extended up to property line to facilitate future interconnections. Utilities in Natures Way need to be extended also. 5. Note that layout of some lots precludes swimming pools in back yards because of location of septic systems. 6. Demonstrate that it is feasible to extend each cul-de-sac onto the adjoining property. 7. Recommend a shared driveway for the two lots northerly of the new roadway. E, MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Date: 1/18/02 RE: App 01-52P—Vintage Hills Subdivision, Barber Hill Road I have reviewed the site plan application for the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision, and have the following comments: 1. The ends of the cul-de-sacs for Vintage Lane and Natures Way should be extended to the propery lines, unless there is some reason not to do so and then the 50 foot ROW would stop at the end of the cul-de-sac. 2. Elevations need to be show for existing contours. It is difficult to determine where the ground is sloping up and where it is sloping down. 3. Grading of some yards needs to be revised and swales shown to address lot-to- lot drainage. This needs to be done between lots 11&12, 14&15, 15&16, 18&19, 5&4, 2&3, 4. Proposed spot elevations need to be shown to determine where low areas are draining between lots 16&17, 17&18, 1&2, 2&3, 3&4 5. No Water or Foundation drains are shown for the house on Lot 19. Footing drains are missing for the houses on lots 1, 3,4, 10 6. The grading between lots 7, 8, and 9 needs to be revised to show swales leading to the yard drains. 7. Surface runoff that will flow down the driveway for Lot 10 needs to be collected before it gets to the road by a pair of catch basins at the bottom of the driveway. 8. Who will be responsible for maintaining the detention basin? 9. What direction is the water flowing in the watercourses shown on the west and south sides of the existing pond? r 10. No inlet or outlet structures are shown on the pipe at the south end of the detention basin. 11.Spot elevations should be shown on all the driveways at the house and the road, and the slopes of these driveways included on the plans. 12. Drainage improvements need to be included in Barber Hill Road to catch and direct water that currently flows off the road onto this property. Catch basins need to be installed in the road at both ends of the 15" CMP that currently crosses the road between SNET Pole # 1170 and the pond. An outlet pipe, structure, and drainage easement need to be shown from the catch basin on the west side of the road. One or two catch basins are needed, both north and south of this crossing to drain water from the road. These catch basins should be piped to the basins at the existing road crossing. 13.Suggest the Pond be included on one lot. The pond will be difficult to access from Lot 6 because of the proposed detention basin and the uncleared area behind the house. 14. Why does Vintage Lane have changing slopes from the bottom of the hill at station 315 to the top at station 333? Suggest one constant slope of approximately 3.28%for this hill. 15. Provide a grading plan for the intersection of Natures Way and Vintage lane, because of the-slopes of both these roads. 16.The test pit information should include the ground elevation at each location. This would make this data more useful. 17.The "minor vegetative clearing" discussed in the traffic report needs to be specifically shown on the plans. 18. 1 do not have the drainage area maps that go along with the drainage analysis. I also have questions about the storage table for the detention basin and other aspects of the drainage calculations. I will call the Engineer about these. Please call me at extension 245 if you have any questions. January 23, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am unable to attend the meetings for the approval of Vintage Hills, however, wanted to express my support of this project. I have reviewed the application and plans for Vintage Hills and feel that this project represents the type of subdivision I would like to see more of in this Town. I have seen similar subdivisions like this in Ellington and Tolland where big houses are spaced apart on larger lots—excellent concept. Sincerely, k6c U)p I �-� A hi `s Five Centennial Drive iiKfCl' �C I�GL l �� o �/ Peabody,MA 01960-7985 v - .�. c YEA a www.westonandsarnpson.com Weston& A,MR. i y Tel'(97B)532-1900 Fax:(978)977-0100 E N G { A. Innovative.Solwionssince 1899 IN YF l5 c �a t- _ i^ti'i•i'.q r January 29,2002 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction; LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06D74 Re: Impacted Soil Management Plan Pudim Farm Residential Development,Barber Hill Road, South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Jacques: Weston&Sampson Engineers Inc. conducted an environmental pesticides soil investigation at the 38-acre Pudim Farm property located on Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, Connecticut, :n December 2001. The farm property is being considered for a residential developmen`:consisting of single-family residential homes. Findings and conclusions presented in the report identified the presence of chlordane in shallow soils in the former agricultural field area above the CTDEP Remediation Standard Regulations Pollutant Mobility criterion. Based on the findings and conclusions presented in the soil investigation report, Weston & Sampson has prepared the following conceptual soil management plan to address the impacted soils that exceed CTDEP standards. The soil management plan addresses the impacted soils in the context of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) Guidance Document on Development of Agricultural properties (March 1999). Briefly,the CTDEP guidance document outlines several management options to reduce exposure risks associated with pesticide related soil impacts. Some of the suggested management options include soil mixing and re-analysis, isolation of impacted soils beneath structures,roac.ways, or placement of affected soils at sufficient depths below grade to render them as isolated from potential exposure. Based on review of the CTDEP guidance document, Weston & Sampson recommends "strip-mining"the top soil from the affected areas of the former agricultural field area and mixing the soil with either deeper soils, or soils from unaffected areas of the property to reduce the effective concentration of chlordane in the site soils. Upon completion of soil stock-piling and mixing, Weston &Sampson recommends collected six (6)to eight (8) soil samples from the soil piles for laboratory analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the impacted soil management approach relative to CTDEP soil standards. Masracbmwas(Np) Maaaclnaera connecacut Rbodelsiand lNew Hamptbim Maitre Five Centennial Drive 100 Foxborough Blvd,Suite 250 2928 Main Street 2348 Post Fioad,Suite B 195 Hanover Street,Suite 28 PO Box 189 xz?44Y•.a• Peabody,MA 01960-7985 Foxb)rough,MA 02035 Glastonbury,CT 06033-1093 Warwick,Fit 02886-2271 Portsmouth,NH 03801 York,ME03909 Mr.John Jacques I January 29,2002 Page 2 of 2 If the.laboratory data demonstrate tha :.the reported concentrations for selected analytical p.araineters are below applicable CT1�EP standards, then the soils would be suitable for unrestricted use at the c.evelopment. In the event that soil data exceed CTDEP standards the affected soils woulcl be better suitW to placement beneath building structures or roadways in accordanc(-.with CTDEA=policy. Weston & Sampson api.:)reciates the opportunity to be of services to Jacques Construction LLC. Please call Mitchell R. Chester''at(860) 659-8668 to discuss this project. Very truly yours, WESTON & SAMPSON ENGINEE*S, INC. Mitchell R. Chester,LISP i Project Manager I I is is is I I is I, 1 i 1. i is i ! 1= Xrt)ale.10.1Prr ( MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe, Assistant Director of Planning From: Robert Deptula�, Environmental Health Officer Date: February 1, 2002 Re: Vintage Hill Subdivision, Barber Hill Road From extensive site investigations, deep test pit observations, percolation testing and review of conceptual plans, it appears as though septic systems will be able to be installed on each of the proposed nineteen lots. Some additional testing remains to be completed as well as modification of some proposals. However, these tasks would only effect the technicalities of actual system installation. Final approval cannot be given for each lot until a final specific septic design for each one is submitted to ensure compliance with the Health Code. RD/cm cc: Barry Ellison Design Professionals 165 So. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 hN Section X: Area,Yard and Height Requirements 10.3 Open Space Subdivisions 10.3.1 Purpose. The purpose of an open space subdivision is to ensure that residential develop- ment in South Windsor, to the extent reasonably possible, preserves open space and the natu- ral features of the land including agricultural soils, wetlands, watercourses and the rural char- acter of the community, without increasing overall density. In the interest of promoting these objectives, development may be permitted on lots of lesser dimension than would otherwise be required by Section 10 of the Zoning Regulations if the conditions set forth in this section are met. 10.3.2 Establishment. It is hereby established that all land within the RR, A-40, A-30, and AA-30 zones is eligible for a Special Exception for an open space subdivision. Where the Commis- sion approves a Special Exception for an open space subdivision the dimensional require- ments (lot area, width/frontage, and required yards) of the underlying zones, outlined in Sec- tion 10,are hereby superseded in their entirety. 10.3.3 Pre Application Conference. Prior to the submission of an application for an open space subdivision,the applicant must initiate a pre-application conference with the Commission and its staff to discuss the conceptual aspects of the proposed development and to prepare and present a conceptual plan, for informal consideration by the Commission. The conceptual plan shall be designed to allow the Commission to make a general comparison between the open space subdivision and a conventional development plan, and should contain all neces- sary information to facilitate the comparison such as potential lot layout for both conventional and open space subdivision; regulated wetlands; topography and areas of steep slopes; wooded areas; other permanently-preserved open space within the vicinity of the proposed subdivision; existing rights-of-way, road stubs, and potential roadway interconnections to existing streets; and any other relevant information. d h R Neither the pre-application conference, the informal review of the conceptual plan, nor the Commission's suggestions shall be deemed to constitute approval or denial of any portion of the application. 10.3.4 Application. The applicant for a Special Exception for an open space subdivision shall file with the Commission, in the Office of the Director of Planning, the following: a. A completed application form and fees for the Special Exception in accordance with Sec- tion 10.2.3 of these Regulations and in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations. b. Seven(7) copies of the proposed development plan showing the information required by the Subdivision Regulations. c. Any and all information necessary to demonstrate compliance with these Regulations. d. As applicable, a summary or general description of the proposed bylaws, rules and regu- lations of any association or corporation of lot owners within the proposed open space subdivision; the proposed method by which all site utilities will be provided;the manner of ownership and maintenance of any private roadways,private or public facilities and any commonly owned real property rights,including open space, and a description of the 177 i Town of South Windsor Subdivision Regulations may require sidewalks on existing street frontage, depending upon l pedestrian circulation patterns and existing site conditions. B.7. Landscape Design a. Reasonable landscaping should be provided at subdivision entrances, along streets (but not within street rights-of-way, and in public areas. The type and - amount of landscaping shall be suited to,the development. b. The plant or other landscaping material that best serves the intended function shall be selected. Landscaping materials shall be appropriate for the local environment, soil conditions, and availability of water. Provisions shall be made for long-term maintenance of landscaping. C. Specific Design Requirements The following design guidelines should be used in conjunction with the design .. requirements contained in the Public Improvement Specifications manual where - applicable and appropriate. C.1. Open Space and Recreation - C.La. Purpose. It is the policy of the Town of South Windsor to preserve open space in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. These open space and recreation requirements have been prepared from a regional perspective in an effort to preserve wildlife habitat, flora and fauna, while preserving for the . citizens of the region an area in which to enjoy nature, with an opportunity to walk,jog, cross country ski,bicycle, picnic, fish, wade, sit or otherwise spend - time in a natural setting. In addition to these passive activities these requirements recognize the importance of areas which may be used for active recreational activities which include competitive sports; and the importance of the Town's agricultural areas, - which the Town strives to preserve, in an effort to provide locally grown fruits and vegetables, dairy products, trees, shrubbery and similar products. T the Agricultural Land Preservation aster Plan, the Open Space Master Plan, and the Recreation Master Plan. together with areas which can unite or link important open space areas. These "linkages" are formed by joining undeveloped and undevelopable land areas, including existing open spaces, areas with developmental restrictions, such as streams, wetlands and severe slopes and through the identification and •• plotting of existing trails. Many of these areas are identified on maps contained within each Master Plan. 24 jot AMEND Subdivision Regulations as follows: Chapter 4 Design and Improvement Standards B. General Design Requirements 5. Commercial and Industrial Development Design Commercial and industrial development shall be designed according to the same principles governing the design of residential developments, namely, buildings shall be located according to topography, with environmentally sensitive areas avoided to the maximum extent practicable; factors such as drainage, noise, odor, and surrounding land uses considered in siting buildings; sufficient access shall be provided, and such access shall conform to applicable access management regulations; and adverse impacts buffered. C. Specific Design Requirements 3. Streets a. Gene 1) Z rangement of streets and other access shall be in harmony with the circulation f the Town Plan of Development and any specific plans for the area of the ision. (2) For not own on the Town Plan, the arrangement shall provide for the appropriate and reasonable provision of new streets or other access or the extension of existing streets. c. Cul-de-Sac (Dead End) Streets (1) Residential Cul-de-Sac Streets, Cul-de-sac streets shall not exceed 600 feet in length measured from the right-ofway line of the intersecting street to the centerpoint of the cul-de-sac radius along the street centerline, Where the cul-de-sac must access Buckland Road or Sullivan Avenue, this requirement may be modified to 1,500 feet in length or 20 lots, whichever is the more restrictive requirement. Where a cul-de-sac street could a ro a extended in the future to another outlet a cul-de-sac street must extend to the property boundary and the sub must include the appropriate right-of- way for the extension, to be deeded to the Town in accordance with procedures specified elsewhere in these regulations. Adopted 8/1/00; effective upon publication 8 Plan of Dcvclopmcnt TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLAN O -- DEVELOPMENT Section I: POPULATION PROD_ _71ONS ► Section II: HOUSING ELEMENT III-1 Section III: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT IV-1 Section IV: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT V I Section V: OPEN SPACE ELEMENT vi-1 Section VI: ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT VII-1 Section VII: UTILITIES ELEMENT VIII-1 Section VIII: RECREATION ELEMENT 1x I Section IX: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT X-1 Section X: LAND USE ELEMENT X1-1 Section XI : APPENDIX X1I-a Originally adopted: 1968 Revised: 1987, 1990, 1994 Latest Revision: October 30, 1995 South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission 6 Y Jam. �oG•�:�� i of South Windsor GOALS AND RECOM.NIENDAT ONS 1. Evenly distribute housing types and densities throughout the communit\ to prevent an undue concentration of housing types and densities from occurring in any area. 1. Maintain and improve the general character and aesthetic quality of residential neighborhoods; for example, the historic nature of Main Street. 2. Develop housing to meet the needs of the entire community, including but not limited to: small families, large families, the elderly, single adult households, various income levels, young adults, young marrieds, and "empty nesters". Approximately forty units of congregate housing should be built within the next five to ten years to meet the needs of a rapidly growing segment of the population, the "frail-elderly," those 80 Years and older. 3. Develop a full range of housing styles, types, sizes, densities, affordability, and forms of ownership in order to meet the housing needs of the community. 4. Support the work of the Architectural Design and Reviex Board to improve the aesthetics of residential development, especially the denser residential uses, by considering the inclusion within the zoning and subdivision regulations of any provisions that they may recommend. 5. Provide open space subdivisions of different varieties depending on the zones in which they are located; that is, lot sizes and required yards should vary. Larger lot sizes and required setbacks would be found in zones with larger conventional lot sizes (for example, A40 zones). Smaller ¢; lot sizes and required setbacks would be in zones with smaller conventional lot sizes (for example, A-20 zones). 6. Assign the Town Plans housing and land use elements of residential uses/densities into three categories: Rural, Low-Medium Dcnsity Residential, and Medium-High Density Residential. Me ccnirai an s preserve in the vicinity of Foster, Strong and West road ue Loiv-Medium Density Residential would be assigned to the majority of the residential areas. Densities within this category would be determined by various criteria. The majority of development in this area would be A-20, A-30, A-40, and AA-30. Medium density development i would be allowed only if it met certain criteria. For example, a development might serve to ' buffer two different uses such as Commercial, Rural, or Medium-High Density Residential from a Low-Medium Dcnsity Residential area. Open space subdivisions might be restricted to A-30, AA-30, and A-40 zones. z II-6 a "l'own of South Wii,,+sor GOALS AND RECOMMEN DATI ONS I. Encourage utilization of the Wetlands Evaluation Systen- tiuit was completed in 1992- The study identified, delineated, mapped and evaluated the wetlands cast of Main Street by using a methodology that rates 13 commonly recognized functional values of inland wetlands. It is necessary to classify wetlands according to their value for various criteria such as flood control, ion, �yildlife habitat, ecological integrity, etc. in recognition of the fact that pollutant assimilat some wetlands are extremely sensitive and important while others may be developed without causing undue environmental impacts. The study can be used by the IWA/CC as a platmtng tool. The accuracy of the study will be reviewed on an ongoing basis and the Agency will dcter7mine how the study is incorporated into future land use decisions. 2. Update the Official Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Map once the new Soil Survey is released by the United States Department of Agriculture kanucipated completion date: 1994-95 time frame). 3. Utilize the report A Floodplain Management Study, dated October 1992 that was prepared by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service in conjunction -,yith the Department of Environmental Protection. This report analyzes several watersheds in South Windsor. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis will provide the Town with infonnation on flood volumes and heights for rainstorms of various recurrence intervals which will be used for evaluating stormwater impacts at major culvert crossings for de\clopment proposals. 1. Update the inventories identifi ing unique and important natural areas such as woodlands, uplands, wetlands, critical habitats, geological features. and aesthetically pleasing areas. The areas identified by the survey team should be given special consideration in development proposals and preserved through open space and conservation easements where possible. 5. Until the more detailed surveys and inventories are completed, the map titled "Environmentally Sensitive Areas," compiled by the Planning Department, Nyill serve as a guide in detcrnuning } Which areas should be given special consideration in development proposals. 6. Preserve the interconnected strcambelt network of the town, especially along the major river corridors, as portrayed on the Town Plan map, through open space land acquisition. toContinue the aggressive agricultural preservation program to preserve existing farmlands that f are lar be in size or arc in areas \\,here they serve as vistas, thereby contributing to the rural character of South Windsor. P r se are: (1)floodplain area of the Connecticut River, (2) central ��ctlands area (bounded generally on the north by Sullivan Avenue, cast by the Podunk River, south by Governor's Highway, and west by Nutirieg Road North)-, and (3) between Abbe Road and the South Windsor-Ellington Town boundary. Thesc three areas have value for agricultural, environmental, educational and/or ! recreational purposes. i VI-2 Plan of Dex eiopnxcnt Whenever lark tracts of i--nd are available t TONNM ii: .un cts should be acauJLr a 9. Preserve to the full extent possible those areas designated as environmentally scnsmve in the I- 291 Master Plan, via use of conservation easements and/or other appropriate conservation mechanisms. 10. Protect and preserve mature trees to the maximum extent possible on all sites as thcv arc 1 valuable as natural buffers and provide aesthetic qualities and site enhancement. 11. Aquifers (groundwater resources Nvith potential for high vields) should be identified and protected for future public water supplies. An Aquifer Protection Program should be undertaken, which will involve the identification of aquifers and recharge areas (i.e., areas where rain infiltrates soil and travels down to the water table), plus development of effective land use controls and other measures for protection. The DEP Aquifer Protection Program (wellhead protection) can be an initial step toward this goal. VI-3 1 Town of South Windsor OIL GOADS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ow 1. Insofar as the dominant mode of housing in South Windsor through the v car 2000 Nyill and MR should continue to be the single-family home on an individual lot (toward the Housing Element Nimr- long term goal of achieving a ratio of' 80% single family dwelling units to 20% multifamily dwelling units, such residential land use should be reinforced through this plan. land use regulations, and the land use decision-making process. 2. Residential land use should be characterized by an even distribution of housing types and densities throughout the communit}: and this plan, land use regulations, and the land use decision-making process should be utilized to avoid an undue concentration of housing types and densities in any particular area of South Windsor, as outlined in the Housing Element. 3. Where residential land uses are to abut industrial or conumrcial uses, a Ta l on WK-- both residential and industriaUcommercial land, should be established in order to reduce or mitigate any potential impacts on both residential and industrial uses. 4. Open space subdivisions within each single-family residential zone should have separate and distinguishable standards for minimum lot width, lot size and yard requirements, in order to foster a greater diversity of subdivisions, as outlined in the Housing Element. ' 5. Land uses, as portrayed on the Town Plan map, should fall within the following categories: a. Rural The Rural land use category is reserved for three large areas to be preserved and protected in recognition of their value for agricultural, environmental, educational, historical, and/or recreational purposes toward the goal of retaining large areas of a rural character within a growing suburban community, and to enhance the quality of life for those who reside and work <_ in South Windsor. These three areas include: the Main Strcet/Connecticut River corridor north of Interstate 291-1 the Central Wetlands Preserve in the vicinity of Foster. T aid West Road The Rural category is characterized by the Conununity's lowest intensity land uses. The primary land uses to be encouraged are: agriculture; open space, nature preserves; and passive recreation. Residential land uses would be limited to single-family homes on large lots only, with reconunended minimum rL:sidcntial density far czceedin one acre for every home. The new A- 60 zone ma - be r The pimcipal features of the Main Strcet/Connecticut River corridor are the historic character of its structures. agriculture, rural vistas, the Connecticut River, sensitive meadows/flood plain, a lower density development pattern, and a variety of compatible land uses. The East Windsor X-2 Hill IIISLOfIC sh—;IJ DC Uxit--nacc: southeriv to 1-2,1 File Must a riculturc, i.w. densIt . 1110LIMIVI N11.11tCd C0111patible coniiiiercial uses- L�Ift snops, bcd and bi-ca-kila.-Ii homes. anc: passive recreation. The principal features of' the Cciitral \Vctlarids Preserve :.re Its FLII-ai vistas. +.Ciland marshes. forested swanips, and lower denSiLV development pati,,:..:.. 'File most Sl.fliable 1.111d uses arc: agriculture. op '110LIld, be of lo\\ density, li" !U principal fea,t6res of the expanded Pudim area in the vicinity of the Town-owned Pudini nature preserve, Barber 1-1111 Road, and Nlederwerfer Road north of Ellington 1Zuad (Route 74) are: its rural vistas and views of downtown Hartford and the Avon Mouia_aiIis, o;i2 Pudim property; agriculture- nature preserves; significant open spaces; uplands forest and meadows. and a low density development pattern. Suburban residential land uses have been and are continuing to encroach on the SOLItlicrIN' and Nvesterly fringes of this area. including the extension of public utilities. The Most appropriate larid uses arc: open space. agriculture, limited recreation.- and nature preserves. Any housing should be of low density and b. Residential The larger Residential land use category I residential sigric too a ance of the res dential areas on die Tov,'n ]'fail map, and contains most existing residenti.ii land whether suburban or rural in character. The majority of future residential growth should occur within this categorv. The principal f'c-,ItLIFCS Of the PcsIcicil-Lial area are' its varlets of residential land uses and densities: proximity to public utilities and transportation systems, desirable developable land-, alid open spaces, within and adjacent to development. As development occurs, interior streets are to be actively encouraged, NvIth limited curb cuts along existing collector or arterial streets. Lon-Medium Density Residential Low-McchUni Dcnsltv Residential would be assigned to the majority of the residential areas. Densities within this CatCgOFV \Wldd be determined by various criteria. Thc inaJority of development in this area \%0LIld be A-210, A-30, A-40, and AA-30. MCCIILIIII (ICIISI[.\ development would be allowed only If it ilict certain criteria. For example, a development might serve to buffer two different uses Such as C01111liercial, Rural, or Mediurn-High Density Residential from a Low-Mcchurn Density Residential area. Open space subdivisions might be restricted to A-30, AA-30, and A-40 zones. Dcnsit.y Density Rcsidcritid \\0LI1d be assigned to �pcclfic corridors in diflercill areas of' town. For example, DRZ and N11- zones might be limited to those areas having direct access to state routes or \%here thc\ scrvud to buffer less dense residential developments front commercial X-3 Update Forum Status Page 3 of 10 John Fitch Boulevard/Route 5 Bike Trail from Abbe Road to Pleasant improvements/reuse Valley Road 1 Buckland Road corridor architectural Buffers design, sidewalks, preserve open space 3 Balance the economic base Access to Connecticut River/Linear Park 3 Business development/attraction Indoor Pool/All season sports facility 1 Office development rather than retail Walking trail at Desmond Pond on Pierce Road Need planned growth(impact on Recreation area at Ellington border infrastructure) 3 Focus on existing commercial/industrial Sidewalks buildings before encouraging new development Maintenance of plantings at Route 74 Larger lots i Purchase former post office Boardwalks on Strong Road Top of Page ISSUE RANKING TALLY—BY TOTAL (75 Respondents) Preservation of farmland(67) E E Protection of scenic areas/vistas(65) E Preservation of Town character(64) Protection of historic areas (63) Protection of natural resources(61) E Growth management(61) I Redevelopment of old vacant buildings(56) Protection of Main Street(47) Visual improvement of Route 5 (40) s http://www.southwindsor.org/TownHall/Town%2oPlan/Status.htin �`'� Job 12/12/2001 Appl #01-52P, Vintage Hills Subdivision Public Hearing 02-05-02 1. e ues appro al of ubds°on to mate 19 �-kb r T3i11 Read; e. a s' a 'ze 's 3 r `-� 2. Vmu t sizer fired in t zon 40,00 sf. h_e,xr�i�imm iz jus ver 4 0 square 3. ation consists o i endiirg—WWM-cat-- e . The applicant had previously appeared before the Commission for a concept review of this subdivision; the Commission suggested that the subdivision layout was not particularly creative. It does not appear that the layout has been modified from that which was originally presented to the Commission. 4. The applicant is proposing to provide two 50' road stubs for possible road extensions to the north and south. Staff strongly recommend that if approved, the two cul-de-sacs and their utilities extend to the property boundaries. 5. In accordance with Section 4.c of the subdivision regulations;rhe subdivider proposes to provide a fee in lieu of open space. Under State statute, the fee in lieu of open space shall be equal to no more than ten percent of the fair market value of the land to be subdivided prior to the approval of the subdivision. The fair market value is determined by an appraiser selected jointly by the Commission and the applicant, with the cost borne by the applicant. 6. There are regulated wetlands on the property. The application is pending with IWA/CC. 7. The plan shows four lots with new driveways onto Barber Hill Road. Lots 2 and 18 should have their driveways on the new street, in accordance with the subdivision regulations, since Barber Hill Rd is a collector street. There are no sidewalks shown; they should be shown on both sides of the new streets. 8. The site will be serviced by public water and septic systems. Site conditions are very difficult for septic systems on this property; however, it appears that septic systems will be able to be engineered. 9. There are some sight line improvements needed; this can be accomplished by clearing vegetation. Also proposed for clearing are two existing trees located in close proximity to Barber Hill Road 10. Street trees are shown on both sides of all streets; The street trees should be located in a street trees easement (that can be shared with CL&P). 11. This property borders an active agricultural use to the south, and there have been difficulties when new residences are constructed next to active farming uses. The applicant could address this at least in part by providing a conservation easement along the southern property boundary. 12. Staff recommend that the hearing for this application be continued so that necessary plan revisions can be completed and the IWA/CC action incorporated into the record. If this application is approved, Planning Dept requests the following modifications in addition to those already noted: • Plan should reflect the open space requirement will be met • Barber Hill Road should be identified on the key maps • Lot 7 is missing its rear yjard; Lot 9 should read 20' side yard, not 20' rear yard • Do not show the 90 x 90 buildable square except on lots where it is tight; one designated, the house must be built within it. Instead include a note that says all lots meet the 90 x 90 buildable square requirement. 12 Low 4 At Ad Ay - D 7n L- TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STRATEGIC PLAN FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I. INTRODUCTION One of the priorities identified by citizens of South Windsor through surveys, at public hearings, and via referendum is the importance of retaining natural open space in the Town of South Windsor. Natural areas provide an avenue for many types-of outdoor recreation, from hiking to wildlife watching. The aesthetic qualities of natural areas enhance property values, promote the rural character of the Town, and provide a pleasing contrast to high density residential and commercial development. The.Town of South Widnsor has.dedicated large amounts of resources, both financial and staff and citizen volunteer to the purchase and preservation of diverse types of open space areas. In order to maintain the diversity of these natural areas, the land must be managed accordingly. II. MISSION To enhance the public's outdoor opportunities through the sustainable management of the Town's trees, forests, wildlife , and other natural resources. III. PURPOSE Residential open space subdivisions have added various parcels of open space to the Town's land inventory. Many of these parcels were added without a specific vision of the larger land inventory picture or without a specific management plan in mind. Thus, the challenge for today's guardians of the Town's forests, trees, and wildlife, and other natural resources, is to develop a responsible forest and wildlife plan which will meet the goals listed below consistent with the mission statement. The overall intent of the Strategic Plan for Natural Resource Management is to provide a coordinated approach to managing the Town's forest, tree, wildlife and other natural resources consistent with the Town's Plan of Conservation and Development, the Recreation Master Plan, the Open Space Master Plan and the Town's Strategic Plan. IV. GOALS A. Inventory and Classification of parcels with their resources. B. Identify outdoor opportunities in relation to resources. C. Prioritize parcels according to size, location, and quality, opportunity, potential of natural resources. D. Develop individual management plans for each property to be completed within 10 years which consider: • the maintenance of the biological diversity and health of our major forest ecosystem and wooded properties. • the potential economic benefits of properly managed forest and wooded properties. • the development of passive recreation opportunities for the public including educational opportunities to observe trees, wildlife and other natural resources. • the establishment and maintenance of home range opportunities for a diverse population of birds and mammals. • the creation of partnerships among landowners and other interested groups to work together for sustainable forest, tree and wildlife management. V. SUMMARY The Town's Strategic Plan for Natural Resource Management which includes Forest and Wildlife Management has been prepared at a time when the Town is experiencing a period of rapid development. This rapid development is reducing the number and acreage of undeveloped parcels in Town, thus putting additional pressure on our remaining forest/woodlands and wildlife. The strategic plan seeks to provide a responsible direction to managing the Town's forestry and wildlife, and natural resources. The strategic plan will be updated periodically. It will be the basic document from which individual parcel implementation plans and the annual supporting budget and resource allocation plans will be developed. Sustainable forest, tree, wildlife, and natural resource management will require a higher level of funding and resource allocation than is provided today. The Public, the Town Boards and Commissions, the Town Council, Town Staff and community special interest and civic groups must work together to bring these efforts to a successful reality. Public Works/Gantic/Forestry and Wildlife Management 7/7/99 2 e c►, Apgl #01-52P, Vintage Hills Subdivision Public Hearing 02-05-02 1. Request for approval of a subdivision to create 19 lots on Barber Hill Road, RR zone. The site size is 34.59 acres. 2. Minimum lot size required in the RR zone is 40,000 sf. The minimum lot size proposed is just over 40,000 square feet. 3. The road configuration consists of a main entrance from Barber Hill Rd ending in two cul-de-sacs. The applicant had previously appeared before the Commission for a concept review of this subdivision; the Commission suggested that the subdivision layout was not particularly creative. It does not appear that the layout has been modified from that which was originally presented to the Commission. 4. The applicant is proposing to provide two 50' road stubs for possible road extensions to the north and south. Staff strongly recommend that if approved, the two cul-de-sacs and their utilities extend to the property boundaries. 5. In accordance with Section 4.c of the subdivision regulations, the subdivider proposes to provide a fee in lieu of open space. Under State statute, the fee in lieu of open space shall be equal to no more than ten percent of the fair market value of the land to be subdivided prior to the approval of the subdivision. The fair market value is determined by an appraiser selected jointly by the Commission and the applicant, with the cost borne by the applicant. 6. The subdivision regulations give the Commission the ability to require an open space subdivision when the subject property is included in a preservation master plan such as the Open Space Master Plan or Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan. The subject property is included in the Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan as desirable for preservation. Therefore, if the Commission so desires, it could require that this property be developed as an open space subdivision, with 50% of the land preserved. It must be noted, however, that since there are no sewers and this site has soils that are very difficult for septic systems, the smaller lots associated with an open space subdivision would probably not be feasible. 7. There are regulated wetlands on the property. The application is pending with IWA/CC. �JJI J L�� cx1j �� f 5 L 8. The plan shows four lots with new driveways onto Barber Hill Road. Lots 2 and 18 should have their driveways on the new street, in accordance with the subdivision regulations, since Barber Hill Rd is a collector street. There are no sidewalks shown; they should be shown on both sides of the new streets. 9. The site will be serviced by public water and septic systems. Site conditions are very difficult for septic systems on this property; however, it appears that septic systems will be able to be engineered. 10. There are some sight line improvements needed; this can be accomplished by clearing vegetation. Also proposed for clearing are two existing trees located in close proximity to Barber Hill Road 11. Street trees are shown on both sides of all streets; The street trees should be located in a street trees easement (that can be shared with CL&P). 12. This property borders an active agricultural use to the south, and there have been difficulties when new residences are constructed next to active farming uses. The applicant could address this at least in part by providing a conservation easement along the southern property boundary. 13. Staff recommend that the hearing for this application be continued so that necessary plan revisions can be completed and the IWA/CC action incorporated into the record. If this application is approved, Planning Dept requests the following modifications in addition to those already noted: Plan should reflect how the open space requirement will be met y Barber Hill Road should be identified on the key maps Lot 7 is missing its rear yeard; Lot 9 should read 20' side yard, not 20' rear yard • Do not show the 90 x 90 buildable square except on lots where it is tight; one designated, the house must be built within it. Instead include a note that says all lots meet the 90 x 90 buildable square requirement. ` , ---f n C� �. Stephen and Donna Biancardi 35 Summit Dr. South Windsor CT 06074 February 6, 2002 South Windsor Planning and Zoning 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Jacques Construction—Vintage Hills To Whom It May Concern: We grew up in South Windsor and decided to raise our family in South Windsor. We have seen South Windsor grow over the years with new homes replacing farm land. Vintage Hills offers a great layout that complements that area of town. Small subdivisions with larger lots add character to this town that is flooded with subdivisions with small lots and big homes. I fully support the approval of this project. Sincerely, Steve and Donna Biancardi Michael and Stacy Muffin 170 Orchard Hill Dr. South Windsor CT 06074 February 7, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision Application To Whom It May Concern: Vintage Hills offers the Town of South Windsor a small subdivision with a lot of character. 19 homes spread over this parcel of land on Barber Hill Road fits in perfectly with that area of town. I support the application by Jacques Construction to build this project as proposed. As this town grows, I hope to see similar subdivisions built more often. Sincerely, lln" le /7 cui Ale Michael and Stacy Murrin v � o 4t ff '60 lw"06 noozr -v a r DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers •planners . surveyors . gis February 14,2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor,Ct 06074 Attn:Ms.Marcia Banach Town Planner Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Marcia We are writing in response to planning comments(no date),Engineering comments by J Doolittle dated 1/18/02, and by Jeff Folger dated 1-28-02,and 1-29-02. Our responses to the like numbered comments are as follows: Planning Comments: Zoning Data Table Based on discussions with town staff,we understood that the town would want the fee in lieu of open space. We have indicated this on the cover sheet. Ka Map Barber Hill Road is identified on the Key map. Plot Plan The street tree easement has been shown on the plans. General Comments 1. The landscape plan has been revised to conform to the town requirements. 2. The plans have been revised to include drainage improvements in this area. The main problem.has been the lack of a defined ditch in this area. The plans reflect a defined ditch that will allow for clear drainage away from the roadway. 3 Sidewalks have been shown on the plans on both sides of the street. 4. Neither cul-de-sac should be extended up to the property lines. There are no known plans to develop �—� either the property to the north or south. The additional pavement would be a waste of money to install and maintain by the town. The desire is to provide a buffer between the farming operations and the residential. To open up these areas to extend a road to no-where will only result in additional conflicts between the two uses. Neither abutter is looking for these roads to be extended. Ample easements have been provided to allow for the extensions if they are ever needed in the future. 5. A note has been added to the plans to cover the few lots that this would apply on. C'P6. l ans have been prepared to show the extension of the cul-de-sacs to the property lines. Looking at the everall assessors map,and the layout of the wetlands in the field,shows the general feasibility of xtending these roads. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors • gis 7. Access to the lot on the north side of the intersection of Barber Hill road and the new subdivision road has been revised to access the new subdivision road and not Barber Hill Road. Jeff Folger's Comments dated 1-28-02 1. The existing foliage line that was shown very lightly on the submitted plans will be shown slightly darker. 2. The wetland flag numbers have been shown on the plans. 3. The stormwater basin has been revised as noted. 4. In order to determine the likelihood of the noted areas being vernal pools by providing Hydrology information,we would need to determine the soil characteristics of the soils within the vernal pool areas by excavating test pits. The test pit excavations would damage the wetland areas noted. We are not proposing any disturbance within these areas,or within close proximity to these areas. We are proposing a conservation easement around this rear wetland area. 5. We have requested a soil scientist report for this site from our consultant. JeffFolger's Comments dated 1-29-02 1. Temporary sediment basins have been added to the plans with a note as to sizing. Jeff Doolittle's Comments dated 1/18/02 1. See response to planning comment. 2. Additional labeling of elevation contours added to the plans. 3. Yard grading revised as noted. 4. Additional spot elevations added to the plans. The area in the rear of lots 1,2,3,and 4 drains to the existing intermittent watercourse(excavated ditch)that drains around the west side of the pond to the south. This area is not proposed to be disturbed,and will continue to drain as in the natural condition. 5. Water service,and footing drains shown as noted. 6. Grading revised as noted. 7. A yard drain added to collect this runoff. 8. If the town is not responsible for maintenance of the detention basin,than it will be the homeowner's responsibility. 9. The water flows to the south,and has been noted on the plans. 10. Structures have been added as noted. 1 i. We do not understand this new request to start showing driveway designs on a conceptual plan. The houses and driveways shown on the plans are for representative purposes only. At the time of plot plan submission,the actual house and driveway configuration will be shown. The lots do not have severe grading restraints,such that there would be any reasonable question as to the ability to design a house and driveway that would meet all town requirements. 12. Our client agrees that there is an existing problem with drainage on Barber Hill Road. The single largest reason for this problem is the lack of a ditch to discharge to from the existing pipe. In the spirit of cooperation,to help solve this existing problem that our subdivision will in no way make worse,we propose to provide the town with the discharge rights onto this property. In addition,our client will grade the area to drain properly,and install a catch basin on each end of the existing pipe. Town personnel should complete any additional work that you feel is required,as this is an existing problem that our subdivision is in no way affecting. 13. We prefer to leave the lot layout the way it is. The pond can easily be accessed from lot six simple by walking through the woods and around the detention basin. The existing watercourse is nothing more than an excavated ditch,and can easily be crossed by jumping over it. 14. Vintage lane profile has been revised. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis 15. A grading plan for this intersection has been prepared and included on the plans. 16. We do not believe that adding a surface elevation to the test pit information is necessary or warrants the additional expense to our client. When test pits are excavated,they may extend over 15'in length. The grade change in the area of the test pit may be over a foot. When test pits are read,information may be obtained from different locations within the pit based. Any hard elevation of the surface of the pit would be misleading,would not mean anything,and would not be any more accurate than interpolating based on the topographic information on the plans. 17. We have shown the general areas that would need to be cleared as required. 18. We have included the drainage area maps for your review. Please review the enclosed,and feel free to call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Galen Semprebon,P.E. Director of Engineering Enclosures: CC:Jeff Folger Jeff Doolittle 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 a Fax: (860)291-8757 SOWN Se co C v { Cf, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f�6SOR-C AREA CODE 860/644-2511 To: Design Professionals 165 So. Satellite Road FEB 1 5 2002 South Windsor, CT 06074 iSOU11 From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: February 15, 2002 Re: A . #01-52P - Review of the proposed Vintage Hill - pp s residential subdivision Plans p p g dated 2/13/2002. I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following additional comments: 1. The outlet to the proposed detention basin still does not have an energy dissipater shown. 2. Interior grading shown within the basin is inadequate, more diversity in microtopography, and interior diversions are needed. 3. No details are supplied concerning topsoil depth or composition for the basin bottom. 4. The conservation easement should include the existing tree line to protect the existing edge habitat. Cc: IWA/CC Town Engineer Dir. of Planning February 17, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 To Whom It May Concern: 'e Although my work schedule does not permit me to attend the meetings for the subdivision proposed by Jacques Construction, I feel you should know that I support the project as proposed. Sincerely yours, �aw� 0 Memorandum To: Kevin McCann, Chair - South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission CC: IWA/CC From: Elizabeth A. Warren - Chair, South Windsor Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission Date: February 19, 2002 Re: Appl. 01-52P, Vintage Hill Subdivision. The northern property boundary of the site has a stone wall that separates the parcel from adjacent parcels to the north. The Conservation Commission would like to recommend that the preservation of perimeter stone walls and associated mature trees be considered. Stonewalls and mature hedgerows are a unique cultural feature found on our landscape and represent a tangible symbol of South Windsor's agrarian roots. 1 RECEIVED FEB 2 1 2002 Robert J. Mongeon, Jr. Roxanne M. Mongeon SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. 229 Old Farm Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 21, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed sudivision should be at the very least an open space subdivision as its location is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We realize that septic systems are required here and that the MIN. 20,000 sq.ft lot requirement in an open space subdivision would not be suffiecient plus engineered systems will be required as some of the "modeling" is within 12 inches of ground level. Oh well, a 2800 plus sq.ft house would look silly on a lot that size anyways. Cutting to the chase, the applicant could create something really special here with 60,000 sq.ft. lots, the families that buy here would have plenty of room for swimming pools, outbuildings, and whatnot on the lot. The "open space"would not hurt the State Wildlife Sanctuary across the street with the Town-owned Pudim area(117 acres) and lets not forget the Bird Sanctuary. Regulations speak of open space creating corridors between large pieces, well this piece would almost connect the 160+ acres mentioned above thats on the east side of Barber Hill Road with the 48 acres of open space between Abbe and Graham(the Podunk River flows thru this) and I believe the town owns more open space along the Podunk west of Graham behind Eli-Terri school and beyond.........What a wonderful opportunity. Bottom Line thought: The smallest lot should be 1 1/4 (one and one quarter)acre. Realtor and Taxpayers point of view on fee in lieu of open space: great deal for the developer in this case, lousy deal for South Windsor and her citizens, not to mention the environment. Another thought is to promote development as outlined in the Plan of Development,thats a plan that could work also. Vintage Hills as it sits is all about MONEY, this plan creates the most bucks for the applicant with no consideration to Master Plans, Environment, Abbutters, or the citizens of South Windsor; its all about MONEY. Question: How much is Too Much? Why did the applicant call me the week before the first P&Z meeting and ask if we could get together to talk about my Real Estate company marketing this proposed 19 lot subdivision? Is lot#10 a rear lot or am I missing something?Frontage along the side of Lot 99 ?? Thats stretching things abit, in my mind. When I offered to purchase a buffer, the applicant offered lot#10 to me for$175,000, such a deal. And will approval of Vintage Hills as it is set the tone for the future in this corner of South Windsor? Are we going to see " Just More Houses" packed like a "Sardine Can" in this Rural Preserve area for the next 10 to 15 years? Or can we work together to create a "Harmonius Mix" of Houses and Agriculture? Finally, I promised at the first meeting to keep you informed on a boundry dispute, We may well be going to court as legal action may be required. Parts of Lots#10, 11, and 12 are on our land. I wonder if the applicant has checked with the owner on this, wouldn't it be a goof if the owner told the applicant I am right? This area is the Northwest corner of proposed Subdivision. 41/ The "internal" stone walls in this corner are part of our eastern and part of our southern borders as outlinelined in a freehand sketch below. There is an interesting history to this corner but to keep it simple, after reviewing the Superior Court file from 1924 and aerial photos of land usage by Pudim from 1934 thru 1995(supplied by DEP, Ct. State Library, and Town Star,these are the "true" boundries. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Attached are my reciepts for my certified copy of the Maskel vs.Pudim file(I am the first person to open in 77 years). A note here: Maskel took Pudim to court to keep Pudim off Maskel land, Maskel won. Maskels boundries are mentioned above and sketched below. We now own Maskels land. Respectfully, le wl tv ert ngeo Jr. oxanne M. Mongeon RECEIVED 50� b AW o�Q ye¢rrB��i�t� FEB 2 1 2002 4 ' 140A SOUTH �S^�"�(p �_ WINDSOR PLAWNG DEPT. �1 W'" 5` tw� STATE OF CONNECTICUT CONNECTICUT STATE LIBRARY UeHAPY 231 Captiol Avenue 9 Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1537 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) ( SS . STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) I hereby certify that the document Connecticut State Archives Record Group 3 Records of the Judicial Department of the State Of Connecticut Hartford County Superior Court Cases 1899-1945 Box 414A (1923124) File 126371 Simon Maskel vs. John Pudin June 18,1924 to which this certificate is attached is a true copy of a record turned over to me and on deposit in the State Library in accordance with the provisions of Section 11-4c of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958, Revised to January 1, 1999. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the State Library at Hartford, this day Tuesday February 19,2002. Kendall F. Wiggin State Librarian per Bonnie J. Linc i, Librarian II History& Genealogy Unit Connecticut State Library An Equal Opportunity Employer *INVOICE/ORDER FORM Remit to NO. .48943 S—L 115'Revised 1/01 CONNECTICUT STATE LIBRARY FISCAL SERVICES OFFICE 231 CAPITOL AVENUE,HARTFORD, CT 06106 Copying/Library Service: _Photostat hotocopy(B/W) _Photocopy(COLOR) _Certification _Genealogical Index Search _$.15 page(state agency) _$1.00 page(8 '/z xl l) _$1 per document _$5.00 state resident %2 sheet$13 $.25-page(8 '/2 xl 1) $1.00 page(8%.x14) _$15.00 out of state - _full sheet$15 _$.25 page(8 1/2 xl4) _$1.25 page(I lx17) $.50 page(l lx17) _Microform Print _Other _$.25 page _Database Services Office use only: Prepared by: 1" it Unit F-t DATE Documents to be: Mailed Patron P UP Faxed FedEx. Return to , .`t 1 r_i t i, L< ,,-C.— 7 -i Cri er }`r PAID BY: CASH TRANSFER CHARGE' CHECK# Photodup Completion DATE t , a,_,,_=y DATE patron notified for PKUP DATE of Patron PKUP DATE Mailed DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL OR SERVICE No. of Pages Cost -ttf{_ Pa a3k' +« J -' !` f f,. r No.of `_;`. s t v n v 1 Certifications Subtotal Mailing Address/Fax Number/Fe'dEx Ntim b"er -"`� 1 w �.,._ x r.�:. Handling $3.00 Name', to 4 t r i�C.1� Postage $2.50/Mailing Tube Total It.f` s .. ✓ R': : f ( , Remit to: Telephone No: � �. T� .`�. ('+�onnecticut State Library 'Y- r • :u 1 r t P i_? Fiscal Services Office FedEx.No. 231 Capitol Ave.,Hartford CT 06106 COPYRIGHT NOTICE:The copyright law of the United States(Title 17,United States Code)governs the ipaking of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material.Under certain conditions specified in the law,libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a-photocopy or other reproduction.One ofthese specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be"used for any purpose other than private,Study,schdlarsWp,or research."If the user makes a request for,or later uses,a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of"fair use,"that user may be liAble For copyright infringement.This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if,in its judgement,fulfillment of the order would involve violation ofoopyright law. PATRON COPY i )'/�..-I-:�-'?.��-.��...,�:,-.."./;:,,:..-.�..,,.��:�---�.;1'.--!.-...;-..,"'-....x.--��.4.'_-..I.;�q-.:.�1Ji,�_i.*.....1-9,.���l-�-..-.�1*..-.-'-'-'�'."!.-.1-i�;,i-�5,,�,-.V�.���..,�1':�1-,.�.A'�''.I�-.--�:....-f�.t'�.!.'.-.,�'_:..,'�.�4-�—1-o-���—.'1,:�I�'x-i.'.�:1..,-�,-�1.��:.--.,..�...--��1.".�.�..'�':�..,:I.--...'i-.I'-..�'�:I.��. 4 _ •N } " r T • { R '� ° ♦ �► ;t \ ,' i . - {�o M c 1 f A: R Y f rf _ "' [-r's"rs„k!^� ,cam m . ° _ 0� ,� .', 4 TA..�--'..,- m. I. `l? ✓ - f> G. h^6 . {��V,� /,. ✓ : g ,.�-.' .-.!. . .: '�. . � ,�'.�i I I.- � I I R . �.�. , - -A �: :* L , Qi r4raa1�" "i r. r psi .. .- i t..:� y, 7 1.-..��k:�-'1.t4�-,.....-..'.-I'"'�..I..�5-T".I4.-.'I..4..-,�.:-!I-..�,.�'-"@.�..' ' N F „ � Q 4 7* , O ,i Esc y " ' 1 . •a. / Q t �l y h �I� Yr�SrrT1-t 4Al,. i9lagi14r} �� � `�{!. 1��ill141'" f is R 4r°r of �"iH xvTt� L f3ky ;�er�x�✓6y y r J Y d 3"i i y i t if n sal1 e t >t " • m., r r,. P t7 ti o . c N! °'f r o' t - a _;�-.��.�:I..'..;.,,I1,.�.�.:-��IL;-',:L�.*1-L::��".�-..�:�-1.1��.�-,11...'—:.;,,I'-,�.-I,��,,.��..-.-1-'...w.'a-."..,�..1.4,-:�.--:'.�.i;:.�j.'".'.-,:..' m y !J \ ' w ':J ,w .. N v, \ ' ^ ° f, " Ka d ..1 troy G7:. 0i F.. ^ 7 • �.;�.-�'I,,"�'�-:''-4�:.-,..-.��"I-r.�'i'-.��'.-.I".-.'T i',W.1f""'�1',.-i-�1�fR-L_:-��—�..:-..-'�-,,I r,I"k��,,'.�--;.-�.�;f'..'i:..1;—:1j'�I]-I'.-.-;*.t".'v.-�1 r m..'.I:�''-.�;;,-.�-.%;,�.�-.'F-.'-�..-:,'...�--"-��.,'� f. .�L,.—.:.-'�."�"....I�.,.1--�-�'-..L��.I�.:.-,-:;�.9'.;�..'.F.'—:.-.. y ♦ \N r *....,.,��''�.:.-..,'..1,I,.:.."'.''LL�.-;:A'F�.1.�..-K�p'..---,,.1I.�.�"�I—'"K�-..--�I..,I I:..1—�.'3:.L.,';W.'�.,-�;,.�.�_'��I,.6'—'-�:.�..I'�......;�L.-.-.f.'.-.'—.�b;'..��..�'..--.'�L.-:�..�"II�.L.i—.�.'"�.-..1:...-.-.'�...---'!.-I.1�-.1...I,�jI�:'�'�.-4:�i1'j.'�-.:L.�1:I...-�.��.��".�t ,P"1!I,......'-'-..,-.,�_L..I-'.*.�'..�,:�I-I,..-4-,I..�....I—�..i.�:,.I.-:L..'�.,-'",-.�IN-L—,..,.,..,...%x.:�'1..,1.�1,,-I._-.�I�1�-,',,.:LL7':'---.—',-i%.—.�7.14.:�.I..-.�...I I.-�-...-.. µ \r t ,J' ;9 t0;: O . till, t r''1 f , �k .,-/:'_�..--:��-.:-: ,.'I%�.-.-,..-.::rK }. _ Y7 .. .. �t . pp �'% i .v: 3 ry O C U 4 _ � ` , :7 a "mot' � 4 } ••r f .', JV ._ ki YJ A7'*t7"" �J �.0 ♦ 0 !t • p " + i ?V,kl. 4std � , r ` 3'r� x A !� M1 R� i I I - N ' ? 0. X. / . 3 N ;� 0 .>�, FF w .( _ t r lets Lke."r,y .may •: 1 Joseph and Joan Caruso 555 Dart Hill Road South Windsor, CT 06074 February 21, 2002 South Windsor Town Hall Building Dept. 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 RE: Jacques Construction Application To Whom It May Concern: I support Jacques Construction with their application for the subdivision on Barber Hill Road. I like the idea of a small subdivision with larger lots being proposed in South Windsor. Sincerely yo" rs, Joseph and Joan Caruso February 22, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor Sullivan Ave South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Board Members: As a lifelong resident of South Windsor, I wanted to communicate my support and approval of the Vintage Hills Subdivision being proposed by Jacques Construction. The quality of homes built by Jacques and the layout design with larger lots will only complement the Barber Hill Road area. Sincerely, February 25,2002 Planning and Zoning Town of South Windsor Re: Interest in Vintage Hills Subdivision Dear Town of South Windsor: I am writing you this letter to communicate my support of Jacques application. I hope this letter assists in your approval decision. I am looking to relocate from Milford,New Hampshire. I have looked at several subdivisions in the South Windsor area. I was most surprised to find that the layout of the subdivisions in your town consist of big homes on small lots which I feel creates a"fish bowl'effect with neighbors. Other towns in your area had subdivisions that have larger lots and the houses are spread apart which is what I am used to and looking for. I met with Jacques Construction and reviewed the plans for his new subdivision. This is the type of neighborhood I want my children to grow up in.Approval of the subdivision will probably draw more people to your town that are still looking for that"country feeling"in their neighborhood. Sincerely, Kevin and Helen Leach 44 Armory Road Milford New Hampshire 03055 February 25, 2002 Certified#70001670000775517627 Design Professionals Attn: Peter DeMallie 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,.CT 06074 RE: Appl. #01-52P—Vintage Hills Subdivision-Barber Hill Road—RR-residential zone. To Whom It May Concern: At the February 20, 2002 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved application#01-52P—Vintage Hills Subdivision—Barber Hill Road—Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission application to construct a 19-lot residential subdivision, stormwater structures, and associated improvements on property located westerly of Barber Hill Road(Assessor's map#139,parcel#1)RR—residential zone. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning&Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability,which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on February 20, 2007. It is the landowner(s)/applicant(s)responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 4. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 5. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. Vintage Hills Subdivision February 25, 2002 Page 2 6. The conservation easement is to be established prior to the issuance of building permits for lot#'s 10, 11 and 12. 7. We recommend a bond in the amount of$25,000 be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. 8. We recommend a bond in the amount of$10,000 be submitted to the Planning& Zoning Commission to ensure the establishment of the detention basin and plantings. 9. Topsoil depth in the bottom of the detention basin should be 12"with a 30%by volume amendment of high organic compost. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairperson EW:dr cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Vintage Hills Subdivision February 25, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor Dear Members of the Board: 1 was a resident of South Windsor for a number of years and am a current owner of a business in South Windsor. Within the past year, I moved away from South Windsor with much regret. I was looking to build a new home on a larger lot. The only subdivisions offered in Town, were on small lots in open fields with no trees buffering the neighbors. Vintage Hills represents the type of subdivision I had to move out of Town to find. fully support the approval of this subdivision. Sincerely, ��c� o 9-¢ ECI a ED Sheila Strong Richard Strong E L°.H l 6 2002 394 Graham Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to I1-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section V11-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map#139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing, we request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. Respectfully, [� / Richard Stron Sheila Strong Audrey Zern George Zern 29 Dower Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 SON�N WtNDSOR PLf�NNtNC D�Fl. February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and ZoningCommission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing, we request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. Respectfully, George Zern Audrey Zern K FEB b 2002 Lisa Gould Brad Gould SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, 100 Collins Crossing South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing,we request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. RespectfullAl, Brad Gould Lisa Gould 17v � � 7- I-A), SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING UEEPT, South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, I feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map#139-1)is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. I as a Taxpayers and Resident of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. I also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing my concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing, I request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that I am against the application. Respectfully, R IF as ern W,n.K(1 sourH��vi��nsoR PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, I feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element,section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, H-6 to 11-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map#139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. I as a Taxpayers and Resident of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. I also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing my concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing, I request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that I am against the application. Respectfully, � q E C- Q E D Z002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. SOUTH WINDSOP PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We,the undersigned residents, are against the "Fee in Lieu" of open space proposal. We feel that with the Pudim Parcel's location within a "Rural Preserve Area" and identified in the Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan, any development should be an open space subdivision or developed as outlined in the Land Use Element of our Towns Plan of Development. Conservation easements as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm are strongly supported and encouraged. Thank-you. Signature Printed Name Address Tel# --_— ___--------- --- ----- --_____=-- -- '_ ---------- L Jz /� C � 3. 4. -- '1/ Alaj4on L z, 87 :1 1 6. L32,�e 7. 8. C�� 41 .ce►_e. � )✓� ,P � �as1`�pt S•�,. loy5i-i79S' 10. 4 Z i w 12. d-� ._j L �c9�1 Z February 27, 2002 Planning and Zoning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Proposed Application - Vintage Hills Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I live near the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision and would like the Town of South Windsor to know that I am in favor of the approval of the 19 lot subdivision as proposed. ('ts �� February 27, 2002 Planning and Zoning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Proposed Application -Vintage Hills Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I live near the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision and would like the Town of South Windsor to know that I am in favor of the approval of the 19 lot subdivision as proposed. /�yc !////r ham✓ pig&f�, eve+.-!1i//ZI� At, 4� Aord- /m�iw3onf fe av - rnd T �/ � �li✓ �f SZ.r su/1�fie�o �n ff ke/ny. Cfinaa 14YO ' Cfend2 G�E✓in 3� Gn�'n .Far 1�Co I�o� ��cJvc' �- Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor GT O(PO14 To Whom It May Concern: Although 1 am not able to attend the meetings for the Vintage Hills Subdivision, 1 wanted you to Know that 1 am in full support of the tq lot subdivision proposed on Barber Hill Road. Sincerely, 153 NSemo(-kl Lck h� C.7T Daniel and Sheryl Sylvester 20 Madison Way South Windsor, CT 06074 February 28, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission r Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue ! -'=' M 02 South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Approval—Vintage Hills Dear Commission Members: I am a resident of South Windsor. I moved into this town 6 years ago and currently live in a newer subdivision which I love. Jacques Construction has built a few homes in my neighborhood which is how I learned of the new subdivision he is proposing to build on Barber Hill Road. We met with John Jacques, reviewed the site plans and house plans and have decided to purchase a new home in that subdivision. The layout of the subdivision is perfect—large wooded lots with sidewalks on both sides of the street. If offers all the neighborhood conveniences without the neighbors being too close. Open space subdivisions offer large areas of open space which generally go unused(not to mention upkeep fees to the town)while squeezing as many houses as possible in a smaller space. This layout spreads the houses apart which gives each homeowner more usable land! It would be in the best interest of the town to support and approve this subdivision. Sincerely, Daniel E. Sylvester Sheryl A.PyylvesterA February 28, 2002. South Windsor Planning&Zoning 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Jacques Construction application Dear Planning and Zoning Members: I fully support the approval of the subdivision request by Jacques Construction. The Barber Hill Road area is a beautiful part of town for a small subdivision of this nature. Very Truly Yours, f Del and Stefanie DuFresne 41 Madison Way South Windsor CT 06074 March 3, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor CT 06074 Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to inform the Town of South Windsor that I am in full support of the approval of the subdivision proposed by Jacques Construction. They are providing a great layout for this subdivision and build quality homes. Jacques Construction built our current home and we plan to build in the new subdivision. Sincerely, Aand Defanie DuFresne March 4, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Vintage Hills To Whom It May Concern: I believe the proposed Barber Hill Road Subdivision, Vintage Hills, will be an asset to the town of South Windsor. The plans exhibit a development that is aesthetically appealing and the design is superior. Please consider this letter a strong recommendation to proceed with the planning and construction of Vintage Hills. Sincerely, Kristine Bickford 290 Foster Street South Windsor, CT 06074 3/5/02 Public Hearing continuation for 01-52P, Vintage Hills Revised plans submitted on 2/19/02 and addressed the most of the planning comments. The applicant's plans still do not show the roads being constructed all the way to the property line. Frontage on the cul de sac lots need to be checked for conformance with the zoning regulations ( 3 - rr J MEMORANDUM MAR 2002 To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning soulii'����';�sorz�'��"1"�" u`1' From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer �� Date: 3/5/02 RE:I App 01-52P—Vintage Hills Subdivision, Barber Hill Road I have reviewed the revised site plan application (dated 2/13/02) for the proposed Vintage Hills Subdivision, and have the following comments: 1. The ends of the cul-de-sacs for Vintage Lane and Natures Way should be extended to the property lines, unless there is some reason not to do so and then the 50 foot ROW would stop at the end of the cul-de-sac. 2. The existing contours for elevation 314, 316 and possibly others need to be fixed. In the area of lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, they are shown as solid lines crossing proposed contours for elevations 318, and 320. 3. Label Y1 on Lot 17. 4. Why are easements to the Town of South Windsor shown around yard drains? 5. More information is needed to clarify grading and lot-to-lot drainage in the back and sides of lots 4, 3, 2, and 1. There is a large area without proposed contours. 6. 1 or 2 catch basins are needed at the bottom of the driveway for Lot 10 to catch surface runoff that will flow down the driveway before it gets to the road. A yard drain off the driveway is not sufficient since it is more likely to get clogged by grass, leaves, snow and ice, and not catch runoff from the driveway. 7. Show a swale on the north side of Lot 9 to collect surface runoff before the sidewalk and road. Direct this water to Y2. 8. The outlet from the detention pond should be aligned with the flow in the natural channel? 9. As part of the overall subdivision review process we request elevations be shown on all the driveways at the house and the road, and the slopes of these driveways be included on the subdivision plans prior to approval. This will facilitate our review of grading and drainage and speed up the building permit review process. 10. Thank you for including improvements to the drainage along Barber Hill in front of this property. Please include an outlet pipe with a flared end from the catch basin to this property, and a rip rap splash pad in accordance with Town Specifications. We will discuss any additional drainage work that is needed in this area with the applicant and coordinate this work with the site contractor. 11. Two minor revisions are needed to the grading plan for the intersection of Natures Way and Vintage lane. Remove the flat spot in the middle of this intersection at elevation 326. The elevation of CB17 shown on the grading plan does not agree with the elevation shown on the plan and profile sheets. 12. Final Design plans need to be reviewed and approved by the Town Environmental Health Officer for the proposed septic systems. The septic systems will need to include curtain drains and meet the required separation distances. Surface elevations for the septic will need to be shown. 13. We will review the areas along Barber Hill where the plan sheets 9 and 11 call to clear vegetation as required. We want to insure that trees and shrubs that are in good condition and can be saved are not removed. 14.Show underdrains along both sides of these roads due to soil conditions and the probability of high groundwater. 15. 1 will call the Engineer with questions about the drainage calculations. Please call me at extension 245 if you have any questions. E' MAR 07 2002 12:47 FR HAM SUND EXEC OFFICE 860 654 2621 TO 8e60644?280 P.02iO3 tint burrPs, 248 morgan forms drive,south Windsor, & 06074 (860) 644.9114//8affW @ts.[.9m 'From the banks of the scenic Podunk 17lver" March 6, 2002 C/o Ms, Marcia Banach SOUTH WINNOR PLANNING DEPL UUTHW South Windsor Town Hall INDSORPLANNINGDEPT. 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 To: Chairman McCann and members of the Planning and Zoning Commission Re- Vintage Hills Subdivision—APPL#01.52P Thank you for listening intently earlier this week as I voiced my concerns at the hearing regarding the proposed Vintage Hills 19•lot subdivision. I also listened and learned a great deal. In fact, by virtue of the insightful questioning of the developer by the commission, my opinion that this project was not in the best interest of our township became even more steadfast than it was when I arrived. The developer and his team were unable to directly answer many of your questions, but largely responded with excuses or conjecture. "Limiting factors" of the land was referenced no less than a dozen times, and justified everything from the width of the buffer zone to location of a house on a given property. When Ms. Evans asked directly if blasting would be needed during construction, given the close proximity of the bedrock to the Earth's surface, the developer's engineer hesitated and responded, "I don't believe so." That's not an answer to the question. Ms. Montana's expressing her disappointment that she didn't see "more creativity" in the developers proposal drew a response that lasted a good three minutes; a response that could just as easily have been, "you are right." When responses did include substantive information, they were generally filled with caveats such as "we intend," "we expect," and "we envision." There is no sense of commitment in their words, nor in their spirit. The only "we will" spirit came from the developer's attorney. However, that comment came in an apologetic context, during which he noted his prior behavior could have been construed as "less than positive." The entire discussion further elevated my environmental concerns. It is important that the environmental testing done to date be further reviewed, and assumptions made in those procedures be examined. The developer's environmental specialist commented that agri•chemicals are applied evenly across a farm field; he is speculating or making an assumption that may well have no basis. This is important given the physical disruption that could take place during construction of the proposed development, and is magnified in its proximity to environmental ec�i✓2d tQi✓ c — ,fies►din f c Q a�-aL 1v(d Coin&o- G-e p-� MAR 07 2002 12:47 FR HAM SUND EXEC OFFICE 860 654 2621 TO 88606447280 P.03iO3 areas nearby. It also beg for and answer to Ms. Evans' question about the use of blasting during construction — it has to be "yes" or "no." I found the group's final comment on the extension of the cul de sac, "We don't think it's a practical thing to do right now," to be a reflection that they simply hadn't thought things through when developing their plans. This was one of several times they conceded, "We don't have an easy answer." Perhaps most important was the developer's reluctance to acknowledge the possibility of building a development of fewer than 19 building lots. Members of the group said they simply did not know how many houses could be accommodated in an "open space" configuration. When presented with very appropriate questions from the commission, the developer's team chose to respond by not answering directly—either because they could not or would not, The realities seem obvious, It takes 19 building lots to make this a business venture that is worthwhile—and the developer's trying to make them all fit into this parcel. Fortunately, it takes variances and approvals by your commission to allow him to do this. If approved, this will be a subdivision with no open space in an area designated as "open space" in your strategic plan; a subdivision with inadequate buffers to neighboring areas, with a house placed 40 feet from Mr. Dzen's operating farm; and a subdivisiont with environmental questions that'have been raised but not answered. This is what you are being asked to approve. The developer should find different property to develop— property with fewer "limiting factors" where there are "easy answers." He should develop a parcel that could be profitable, yet within the guidelines of the strategic plan that has been such an instrumental tool in making South Windsor into the jewel that it is today. There is simply too much nonresponsive behavior and too many unknowns regarding Vintage Hills, yet there is an obvious impact on the aesthetics of our town and the character of the environment in which we live. With all the open questions, an approval for this project to move forward in its present configuration would be an arbitrary action by the commission. Please do not let this happen. Thank you again for the opportunity to express my views. And thank you again for the knowledge and the insights that were reflected in your questioning. R spectfull Timothy S. Burris ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** F ---03/12/2002 16:33 0606446962 JOE MONGEON--DEWOLFE PAGE 01 - R. Joseph Mongeon R.E FE°V D 229 Old Farm Road MAR 1. 2 2002 South Windsor, Ct_ 06074 March 12, 2002 SOUTH WIiNDSOR PLANNiING DEPT. 'own of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct, 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-A,ppl #0I-52P Dear Marcia, I spoke with Judge 0. James Purnell, III earlier today and voiced my concerns over what appears to be an incorrect legal description in a 1924 court judgement between Pudim and Maskel. Judge Purnell is the Probate Judge handling the Pudim estate. Judge Purnell has suggested a meeting in his office for all parties concerned within the next 10 days. Hopefully, this meeting will put to rest some questions, however, it must be noted that depending one the outcome of this meeting, any subdivision approval prior to this meeting may need to be modified. Respectfull R. Joseph Mongeon t �,f - <03/12/2002 16:33 8606446962 JOE MONGEON--DEWOLFE PAGE 02 COOP MLS Mar 12, 2002 03:22 FM LOTS .AND VACANT LAND ML# G254257 L/O£f ALM001 Bkr Exch 'Y #Imag 0 Orig LP$88000 L/Pxice$88000 Address 0 /AAR$M HILL ROAD Lot # 2 Area 16 Town S. RIMSOR Zip 06074 EstUnits MaxUnits Status DEPOS SgFt LtDm 00x00 AC 3.00 Map 139 Lot 2 Block Subdiv Owner )99TA'1'E OF Pmn4 RdFrnt 525 WtrFr Assmt 0 Mil1Rt 36.01 PI N Taxes 0 / Vol 0 Page 0 E/ROW Zone Code Al ----------------------------LISTING OFFICE INFORMATION-------------------------- Show CALL OFFICE ByBr 2.5 Dual/Var N Type EA LVID KAZVKYNA/XAAzMn-XAS, TOANNE O/Ph 060-745-3345 XO O/Fax 860-745-1766 Othr/Ph 860-749-2798 Photo NI E-Mail joKAZ125@AoL.cG*4 Net Y/ ,-- _----..-------------------GENERAL INFORMATION--------- ----_------------------ Location Topography ROLL Zoning Desc AGRG Dev Status POEM Soil Desc LOAM Zone Use Eng Teut NONE Restrictions Rem: IMLKING, THE LAND IS AT BUYERS OWN RISK ---------------------------------MISCELLANEOUS-----_--------------------------- Improvement NONE /NONE RdSurface NONE Rd Type NONE Ln NEITHER Super Ln NONE Lot Desc OPEN WtrFrnt / Cable,A,vail Y Will Lease -----------------------------------UTILITIES----------------------------------- Water NONE /NONE Sewer NONE /NONE Gas NONE /NONE Elec NONE -------------------------------OTHER INFORMATION------------------------------- Sale Opts Document Avail OTHER List Date 03/23/01 Othr Fin Encumbrances Exp Date Dir: GRIFFIN TO BABP33M HILL Seller Concession BOOK HFD: NHN: MID: -COMP INFORMATION------------------------------- Contr Date 06/18/01 S/Agt ID HAItRISN /HARRIS, NANCY S/Offi.Ce GAET01 Close Date S/Price ML# Days 88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OfcRems (c) 2002 MLS INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED (o)Copyright.COOP MLS RAOSEPH MONGEON - DaWorce Real Estate AR&a _ �Uj/1z/zUUz 1b:3.3 UUU04407bL JUG muiigCUlY -ir_wuL_ r_ Y"HUC U.3 a COOP NLS Mar 12, 2002 03:22 Fm LOTS AND VACANT LAND ML# G254120 L/Off ALM001 Bkr Exch Y #Imag 0 Orig LP$749000 L/Price$749000 Address 0 /BAV.1WR HILL ROAD Lot # 1 Area 16 Town S. WINDSOR Zip 06074 EatUnits MaxUnits Status DEPOS 5gFt LtDm 00%00 Ac 35.00 Map 0 Lot 0 Block 0 Subdiv 0 Owner ZSTA= or Pvnn4 RdFrnt 1090 WtrFr Assmt 0 MiilRt 36.01 PI N Taxes 0 / Vol. 0 page 0 E/ROW Zone Code Al ---------------------------LISTING OFFICE INFORMATION-------------------------- ShowCALL OrPICE ByBr 2.5 Dual/Var N Type ER LA/ID KhZM0tNA/xAZUKxNA3, Jom= O/Ph 960-745-3345 XO O/Fax 060-745-1766 Othr/Ph 860-749-2790 Photo N/ E-Mail J0KAlL123QA0L.CQ4 Net Y/ ----------------__-GZNERAL INFORMATION------------------------------- Location INT Topography ROLL Zoning Desc AGRG Dev Status RAFT Soil Desc LOAM /SA,NDY Zone Use HORSZ/OTHM Eng Test NONE Restrictions UNIUM Rem: ANY ONE 19JjXTNG THIS LAND WILL p0 80 AT THEIR OWN RISK. ---------------------------------MI5CELLA14EQUS--------------------------------- Improvement NONZ RdSurface XONE Rd Type NONE In NEITHER Super Ln NONE Lot Desc WOOD WtrFrnt / CableA,vail Y Will Lease N --------------------- --------^------UTILITIES----------------------------_-_____- Water NONE /NOM Sewer NONE Gas NONE Elec AVAIL ------ ----------- -------------OTHER INFORMATION------------------------------- Sale Opts Document Avail LEGAL List Date 03/22/01 Othr Fin Encumbrances Exp Date Dir: ROCKVILtZ RD. TO B11=39R HILL ROAD Seller Concession BOOK HFD: NHN: MID: -------------------------------COMP INFORMATION------------------------------- Contr Date 06/18/01 S/Agt ID HARRISN /HARRIS, NANCY S/Office GAET01 Close Date S/Price ML# Days 89 ---------------___..----_-___--------------------------------------------------- OfcRem: (C) 2002 MLS INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED (c)CopyvVly,COOP MLS R.JOSEPH MONGEON - DeWolfe Real Estate Attawa + DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers • planners • surveyors • gis • gps April 3, 2002 Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RECEIVED RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision APR 3 2002 Barber Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut SOUTH WINDSOR PLAWNG OEPT. DPI Project No. 01-1430 Dear Marcia: As per your request, we are transmitting three (3) color exhibits for your presentation to the Planning &Zoning Commission next Tuesday evening, April 9, 2002. These maps are as follows: 1). Original conventional subdivision layout, portraying 19 lots, as previously modified. The closest house to the southerly property line (i.e., Dzen Tree Farm) is now over 100 feet(116 feet). This will leave a substantial natural screening abutting the farm property. As previously agreed during the informal discussion with the Planning&Zoning Commission,this plan portrays no open space, other than that on privately owned lots, and will require my client to make a payment in lieu of open space. 2). The second map modifies the original layout by creating a conventional subdivision with 20% open space. I would anticipate that the open space would be owned either by the Town or a homeowners' association. This has been achieved by reducing the number of lots from 19 down to 17 and by shortening the Nature's Way cul-de-sac. The plan portrays 24%open space or 8.36±acres rather than the minimum of 20% or 6.92± acres. The depicted open space is in bulk and encompasses approximately one-half of our Barber Hill Road frontage and approximately two-thirds of our frontage along the tree farm. Of course,there would be no fee in lieu of open space with this proposal. Although my client would prefer the original 19-lot layout, he could live with this option. 3). The third and final plan is the open space concept plan which portrays only 11 lots and 50% open space (or 17.4 acres of the 34.59 acre tract). This plan is economically infeasible and my client cannot live with it. From day one, my client has assumed that this land would support a large-lot subdivision for 20 luxury homes. He has anticipated the necessity for public water service, given the known groundwater contamination to the south along Barber Hill Road in South Windsor, and to the north along Barber Hill Road in East Windsor(apparently different chemical contaminants in each case). Mr. Jacques and his wife, Ann, are into their third year of business, and have previously only developed individual house lots. This is his first development project on his own, and obviously with the costs of Phase I and Phase II environmental studies/testing, land surveying, site engineering, landscape architecture, legal fees, extensive soils testing for septic systems, and the costs of securing an interest in 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Telephone(860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers • planners • surveyors • gis • gps the property, Mr. Jacques has a substantial dollar investment. I trust the Planning& Zoning Commission and staff will bear this in mind as they review the three development scenarios and reach a consensus. If the original 19-lot layout is acceptable,then we would anticipate an approval. If the 17-lot layout is preferred,then we will need to withdraw the application and resubmit after redesign. This would require a presentation to the Town Council for a determination as to whether or not they would want the open space. If the open space concept with 11 lots were to be required, it is economically infeasible and kills the project. Thank you for your consideration and for you and Michele meeting with me to review these concepts. These maps do in fact reflect modifications, as recommended. Sincerely, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: � A/m/w, eter R. eMallie Principal cc: John Jacques Harold Cummings, Esq. Galen B. Semprebon, P.E. Barry Ellison 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Telephone(860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer scurH v✓1NCS �: �,,ti, rNG Date: 9/23/02 DEPT RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision (01-52P) Phase 2 Bond The Engineering Division has reviewed the bond request for Phase 2 of Vintage Hills subdivision and recommends the initial bond amount be set at $277,130 for this project. Please call me if you have any questions. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �OSOR.C�N� TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 February 25, 2003 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: App101-52P, Vintage Hills Dear Mr.Jacques: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on February 18, 2003, to reduce the subdivision bond from$355,400.00 to $112,600.00. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Cot Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission KMcC/kah cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official r. r 1 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl #01-52P Dear Marcia, We, the undersigned residents, are against the "Fee in Lieu" of open space proposal. We feel that with the Pudim Parcel's location within a "Rural Preserve Area" and identified in the Agricultural Land Preservation Master Plan, any development should be an open space subdivision or developed as outlined in the Land Use Element of our Towns Plan of Development. Conservation easements as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm are strongly supported and encouraged. Thank-you. Signature Printed Name Address Tel# 5. 5a�-g3e3 6. 7. n o 8._ 10. 12. t } n R,_ NEEDS/ RESPONSIBILITY PRIORITIES LEAD & SUPPORT/ - KEY INTERFACES ,--FERENCE Econr~ - _ — - ��1'���` �` MATERIAL C�C6V • Creation of Development Constraints ap ■ Market Studies Town Plan of Conservation and Dever �C�Le,C" Y'` �t� `/v �v -story m■ Use market study to identify target markets—obtain ■ Percent of revenues Development (J ` ig services of CERC to develop impact analysis on • Number of jobs created Redevelopment Agency Plan (�U (��D�CIS S1^j` `C'�g i�, R �� QU r ) tth in population large scale projects • Types of businesses Economic Development�� d e. Buckland P e� �VL� t • Develop EDC plan to include: education, • Tax benefits e J n u � U r� i (� ` S i� .� p Commission Strategic Plan i/;►�Z`�+y e t't 1 / promotion, Redevelopment of Route 5/Sullivan Ave Planning and Zoning Strategic nue business ■ Revise tax incentive/ artnershi documents b� a� o PEN �P,�c�. s�(j��v1S`en — Q�S�p�cZ'�vt(�� ices ■ Creation of Economic Development Database Plan /7 TOSW Incentive Program ouara of Education offered b town • Economic Development Database CERC ■ Assuring aucyua« ,,,,.,.. sources . Capital Improvements Plan ■ Current student learning Beyond 2000—Strategic Plan State, PTO,Town Manager Staff, Various ■ Better integration of school and town budgets • State/Federal funding opportunities Commission —i.e. Human Relations, Drug & • Rising costs for education measures Capital Improvement Plan Alcohol Abuse Cost of performance tracking ■ Residential/commercial tax School Websites Training of staff/commission members ■ Development of training program revenues dollar/per student Town Website Environmental Inland Wetlands/Conservation Comm • Handling tensions and trade-offs ofA ■ Student enrollment SWALPAC (Agricultural •Protection ( g cultural Preservation) development Open Space Master Plan• Aquifer protection Buckland Road Mitigation Plan Open Space Task Force ■ Need for better communication among boards • Develop policies for miti ation IM Local & Regional Groups, WPCA ■ Increasing demands on land Maintenance of Town Manager& Public Works Director • Inadequate funding on an annual basis ■ Lon term funding of the Capital Improvement Plan s Board of Education g g P p Statistics i a mprovemen Infrastructure Resident opposition to improvements • Provide adequate level of operating funds and staff ■ Expenditures Pavement Management Plan Capital Project Committee ■ Operation and Maintenance resources, i.e. ■ State/Federal grants ■ Loss due to claims Annual Budget man ower ■ State condition reports Public Safety Council & Department Heads • Response time • Regional solutions ■ Statistics of police activity Surveys Fire, Police, Public Works,Ambulance • Adequate personnel • Computer Aided Dispatching ■ Trends Surrounding Communities, Building Dept., ■ Growing town—residential/commercial ■ PACT—Police Academ Building and Safety Codes y Sanitarian, Environmental Health, Human Environmental Health Issues ■ Public Education Programs • Eduduchcation of p Department Strategic Plans f public Town Website Services ■ Fire Safety . Training ■ Participation in town sponsored Emergency Operation Plan • Terrorism ■ Employee Assistance Program programs Quality of Town Manager ■ Staffing levels • Training ■ Yearly statistics Satisfaction survey Municipal Department Heads ■ Customer service ■ Total QualityManagement g • Comparisons to other Department Strategic Plans Services • Space needs • Capital Improvement Plan —Space Study communities/Surveys Town Website • Adequacy of programs • Staff Budget Conferences - Best management practices Emergency Operation Plan • Safety of staff/facilities ■ Department Strategic Plans ■ Age/condition of buildings Recreation Town Manager& Recreation Department ■ Town buildingsafetyanal sis ■ Satisfaction surveys Adequate facilities ■ Public/private partnerships ■ Statistics Recreation Master Plan Planning &Zoning; Board of Education; ■ Maintenance of existing facilities . Recreation Master Plan ■ Trends Parks & Recreation Committee ■ Future needs ■ Capital Improvement Plan Capital Improvement Plan Human Services ■ Demographic trends • Customer Feedback Surveys Town Webiste ■ Priv • Referendum results Community Organizations • Funding of improvements undin throu h e er m ■ Type, amount, location, pressures of N" ■ Open Space Task Force development t Plans SWALPAC; Conservation and Historic ■ Population growth and lifestyle changes ■ Commissions Taxes/Financial Council &Town Manager ■ Bond ratingstatus . ■ Cooperative ventures between Board of Education ■ Comparisons of like communities Budget Board of Education & Superintendent ■ Ratio of industrial/commercial taxes and Town of South Windsor ■ Trends Economic Development • Long-term financial projection . State Fiscal Indicators g- P j Improve economic base ■ Annual Budgets Bond Rating State • New opportunities for cost sharing/reduction ■ Cost reduction through best management practices ■ Bond rating between Town and BOE 9 Capital Improvement Plan Traffic Access Management ■ Pedestrian/alternate transportation . Town's Strategic Plan P Sensitive road Improvements; traffic calming; ■ Surveys of roads for speed, etc CRCOG Transportation Study Planning &Zoning/Town Council ■ Impact of improvements on rural character access management; update traffic plans; multi- ■ Statistics on traffic (accidents, Access Management Study Police • Environmental impacts, speed; proliferation of modal travel ATD volumes curb cuts, mass transit, safety, congestion ) Plan of Conservation and Dev. ■ Miles of bikeways/walking trails Recreation Master Plan (lipFe�b6L b� ��osePk �Z�e�� Zzct 01cQ f� O& RECEIVED Robert J. Mongeon, Jr. . FEB 2 1 2002 Roxanne M. Mongeon 229 Old Farm Road SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEBT. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 21, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed sudivision should be at the very least an open space subdivision as its location is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We realize that septic systems are required here and that the MIN. 20,000 sq.ft lot requirement in an open space subdivision would not be suffiecient plus engineered systems will be required as some of the "modeling" is within 12 inches of ground level. Oh well, a 2800 plus sq.ft house would look silly on a lot that size anyways. Cutting to the chase, the applicant could create something really special here with 60,000 sq.ft. lots, the families that buy here would have plenty of room for swimming pools, outbuildings, and whatnot on the lot. The "open space" would not hurt the State Wildlife Sanctuary across the street with the Town-owned Pudim area(117 acres) and lets not forget the Bird Sanctuary. Regulations speak of open space creating corridors between large pieces, well this piece would almost connect the 160+acres mentioned above thats on the east side of Barber Hill Road with the 48 acres of open space between Abbe and Graham(the Podunk River flows thru this) and I believe the town owns more open space along the Podunk west of Graham behind Eli-Terri school and beyond.........What a wonderful opportunity. Bottom Line thought: The smallest lot should be 1 1/4 (one and one quarter) acre. Realtor and Taxpayers point of view on fee in lieu of open space: great deal for the developer in this case, lousy deal for South Windsor and her citizens, not to mention the environment. Another thought is to promote development as outlined in the Plan of Development, thats a plan that could work also. Vintage Hills as it sits is all about MONEY, this plan creates the most bucks for the applicant with no consideration to Master Plans, Environment, Abbutters, or the citizens of South Windsor; its all about MONEY. Question: How much is Too Much? Why did the applicant call me the week before the first P &Z meeting and ask if we could get together to talk about my Real Estate company marketing this proposed 19 lot subdivision? Is lot #10 a rear lot or am I missing something?Frontage along the side of Lot#9 ?? Thats stretching things abit, in my mind. When I offered to purchase a buffer, the applicant offered lot#10 to me for $175,000, such a deal. And will approval of Vintage Hills as it is set the tone for the future in this corner of South Windsor? Are we going to see " Just More Houses" packed like a "Sardine Can" in this Rural Preserve area for the next 10 to 15 years? Or can we work together to create a Harmonius Mix" of Houses and Agriculture? Finally, I promised at the first meeting to keep you informed on a boundry dispute, We may well be going to court as legal action may be required. Parts of Lots#10, 11, and 12 are on our land. I wonder if the applicant has checked with the owner on this, wouldn't it be a goof if the owner told the applicant I am right? This area is the Northwest corner of proposed Subdivision. .Zzi, keON-ecs mf-� 'EXTe(in-%"'4/#A� -/7/// The "internal" stone walls in this corner are part of our eastern and part of our southern borders as outlinelined in a freehand sketch below. There is an interesting history to this corner but to keep it simple, after reviewing the Superior Court file from 1924 and aerial photos of land usage by Pudim from 1934 thru 1995(supplied by DEP, Ct. State Library, and Town Staff, these are the "true" boundries. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Attached are my reciepts for my certified copy of the Maskel vs.Pudim file(I am the first person to open in 77 years). A note here: Maskel took Pudim to court to keep Pudim off Maskel land, Maskel won. Maskels boundries are mentioned above and sketched below. We now own Maskels land. Respectfully, It WOO x,iL WA ert ngeo , Jr. oxanne M. Mongeon S'fin. bQ VED Y T iA/k\( STATE OF CONNECTICUT SL CONNECTICUT STATE LIBRARY GernNY OYi.Yf>VGIy'�1 231 Captiol Avenue • Hartford,Connecticut 06106-1537 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) (STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) SS. I hereby certify that the document Connecticut State Archives Record Group 3 Records of the Judicial Department of the State Of Connecticut Hartford County Superior Court Cases 1899-1945 Box 4-14A (1923124) File#26371 Simon Maskel vs. John Pudin June 18,1924 to which this certificate is attached is a true copy of a record turned over to me and on deposit in the State Library in accordance with the provisions of Section 11-4c of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958, Revised to January 1, 1999. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the State Library at Hartford, this day Tuesday February 19,2002. Kendall F. Wiggin State Librarian per Bonnie J. Linc c, Librarian 11 History& Genealogy Unit Connecticut State Library A An Equal Opportunity Empkver *IWOICE/ORDER FORM Remit to NO. .48943 SL-115 Revised 1/01 CONNECTICUT STATE LIBRARY FISCAL SERVICES OFFICE 231 CAPITOL AVENUE,HARTFORD, CT 06106 Copying/Library Service_, _Photostat _/Photocopy(B/W) _Photocopy(COLOR) _Certification _Genealogical Index Search _$.15 page(state agency) _$1.00 page(8 %:x 11) _$1 per document _$5.00 state resident _%Z sheet$13 $.25 page(8 '/2 x 11) _$1.00 page(8 %x 14) _$15.00 out of state _full sheet$15 _$.25 page(8 %z x14) _$1.25 page(l 1x17) $.50 page(I1x17) _Microform Print _Other _$.25 page Database Services Office use only: Prepared b : l; ` y p y Unit rf—s DATE Documents to be: Mailed Patron P UP Faxed FedEx. Return to �- ,_t . .`I ,t ;.., "e r t7 1 PAID BY: CASH TRANSFER CHARGE CHECK# Photodup Completion DATE X • Icy,c. DATE patron notified for PKUP DATE of Patron PKUP DATE Mailed DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL OR SERVICE _ No.of Pages Cost / l� S]f.t i j! 4 /7� `tr:` ^r ,• . i;7' r7 L I =4- ) r 'v C ' � No.of 1 LLB ""� x...,_ ,Y "''; Certifications fy Y1 -1�-i t } : .•:., �y.: ,.:.: Subtotal Mailing Address/Fax Number/VedEx Number Handling $3.00 Postage Address: g ' $2.50/Mailing Tube Total /, - T'{{ll Telephone No: +w =r�`�:.'� .�;�` � :.. `✓o�': p'• r p �,� �{_ �( ;.,- Remit to: ...1 r'6onnecticut State Library Fax Na. t--.4D— . '.« FedEx.No. ' =` ' Fiscal Services Office k" . F 231 Capitol Ave.,Hartford CT 06106 COPYRIGHT NOTICE:The copyright law of the United States(Title 17,United States Code)governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of oopyrighted material.Under certain conditions specified in the law,libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction.One ofthese specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be"used for any purpose other than private Study,schdlarship,or research."If the user makes a request for,or later uses,a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of"fair use,"that user may be liable fnr copyright infringement.This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if,in its judgement,fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. PATRON COPY Sheila Strong Richard Strong r ci 0 2 3 94 Graham Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl #01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to 11-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3; Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development, Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing, we request that this letter be.read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. Respectfully, 5��C, " 2s � Richard Stron Sheila Strong i A 5 y Audrey Zern George Zern 29 Dower Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Ou February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #139-1)is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development, Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing, we request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. Respectfully, George Zern Audrey Zern v Lisa Gould W> ,., V I1i0Z Brad Gould 100 Collins Crossing _. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct, 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re- Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl #01-52P Dear Marcia, We feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3- Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. We as Taxpayers and Residents of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development, Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. We also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing our concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since we will be unable to attend the public hearing, we request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that we are against the application. Respectfull , Brad Gould Lisa Gould 70 .5�,9772-/ lJi.v msv2 , T Ft6 to(? South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, I feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, H-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3;.and Utilities Element, section VH-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map #13 9-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. I as a Taxpayers and Resident of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. I also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing my concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing, I request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that I am against the application. Respectfully, �J Locc Pad - South Windsor, Ct. 06074 February 25, 2002 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission; Ms. Marcia Banach Re: Vintage Hills Subdivision-Appl#01-52P Dear Marcia, I feel that the proposed subdivision should be either an open space subdivision or developed as sugested in South Windsor's Plan of Development(reference Land Use Element, section X, pages X-1 thru and including X-3, and also is included in the Housing element, II-6 to II-7; Open Space Element, section V-1 to V-3;Environmental Element, section VI-2 VI-3; and Utilities Element, section VII-3), as its location(Vintage Hills, map#139-1) is identified in the Towns Plan of Development as a "Rural Preserve Area" and within the Agricultural Land Master Plan. I as a Taxpayers and Resident of South Windsor feel that this proposal with a "Fee in Lieu" of Open Space completely contradicts our Plan of Development,Master Plans and our Towns Vision statement as appears on the Town website. The only person to benefit from a "Fee in Lieu" of open space on the Pudim Parcel will be the Developer........The Losers will be South Windsors Citizens and her future generations, The Environment, The Wildlife Sanctuary, and our Farmers. I also would encourage conservation easements on the North and South boundries of this proposed subdivision as buffers between the Gedrim Farm and the Dzen Farm. Thank-you for bringing my concerns to staff and commissions attention. Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing, I request that this letter be read into the public record at the hearing and it entered into the records that I am against the application. Respectfully, + ai,, rx-• • �!t i� . '1 .Y;, �`4 �r b '�•tr;' � ,y'`� i+� !'a ��a f'����JYf,�+ '. ��J �'°i ^,.� ' _�.- !•.7 �i�i11p�Ma, � •^�.' �Ir���r�.,b7�►i� C,%�.,,y ,'� .tt,''�t�.�,` jl. •-Y `k�� .,'r� �� � ,�,1 ti w :+... 1�� y" `;j +^rsa:ar t�:•ral������a ,� r•'eq"Qr� � u' ` i�• �i;'� �� i� � 1 '"�t���- '9 ^��A�+ra�y"Ap?:}�Fc<1�r+�. .L� N'1rAe�.M '.,'f,,,'..{� ."1t ilFyl- "'y'�, '� ram*•?:y. 4t�rS+;; �'�, ,,` 4�r....� .:� ,.;� r .•.� � � ,+ �t.,l� w., v'�r y�,' y',.. 1�{.d,�7t.�Yd;} 1 }��'�ji ,.7.." 'W?�'a1 tj+,y"►I� 0�;�'4•, �f°',� �J'4 �]y,�.'NL�,P-,���s/�y1' '�`9,� t•,,. �� 'tt, �,[`� y�� , F� ,� •` /j � •�:ti ,}t�d .�.* �� � � }''�s�.✓•I�r.f�� '..� �r 1. �+� �It`IIr,.4 �'h{ye,'YJ �'.b� "i 4�v�A g:.�yw:i ^ 'il r�� i��'�y� ��9�' ,�y���r`4�1� x of '��.: 'P "A'�. � ':!rn !t n �j��.�P•,?� /. 1 j�w"t �,b r I �f� �'�%'��;,>�r c;,,: ^..,�a�•(I,�•�jr. 'x:� ,�;i p�% ,. � ?~�«Q•'t W,.' �i,��a �?r����, �j� ,,'�r ,,•{, 'y� •.!i �r'�:` yr- .r�. yC,�/,.`. -� ��^ �) f �rPi,+�� �/r�h' yn �"D� i 7�'. '� r.t�4 �►t �� y"db q .�.; r 'l. .�'./�,.�,y '.tyt: •1 �` , " C., ].""�.``���nn�}}11 �`$r ��}/q�• ,l/'.�� k r 1 •1 r �} S'-F'.�� r + 7^ +'� L`��+11�.�'11 �� t k '�'�''r .((IS•. ��� �i/�°�. � , '..��� F '�y �L �V�/^ ,x,/„A,• '� .�'/�••�� ...' +� } � r b /•� i 1 t-, T �,.,�Iq�ty'/f r'; t,� ��; ,f�i � r�,;rj�>Y�'�*�•. �Y. '.:t ��,._r�i}�;�/^ ���`��� y' i., , .�.. .' < .t + S�' l r�Y 7i i� u s'Y l � r y� �F `' !y:t� _• �rr`� �. 7i2�Yi %7'•~ >,( i R, *'1 ..1,=�Nh i^ { 'Mti�ln .1,1..'�. ''�r ,"AJr.��}v •} 1 r 1�I P ,r a' F, Rr/^. i"•y--'�S.' f4, -,Ccp .4. 3 AA ,f " ^I T. _j ,` ,ra -•q ;..k1 tT,f7x;F.`f �t 1 3J r " �., l.�l-•r � .s'� [,,",�: 7/Fd yF. i �iiip•{ ~ J• �NRI� Ir• , r4(. .�:' - ; 4. ,Nt w.•y \t "� 4,� ,•f4. 'A dl ' J f ,� J •i:�f /y` M��'^"«,t.., p l !� ../}' r r }' x 4p *� D ; Ir �TyA,�•yx h.v} 1� / fE q�"�. M e�" �,. •YI"4 ' :�' � ,t.�t+� 'X."'iW�,r fj.r,lC°'r,r,,,,� _ _ .i [+ ,j •, C —00 Ow Ti eyr .• ,' - � � rf� ^,� .,,. 7' 8�^• grit 'se t��-. kv :n ' '1% .. ZI v Ik:�a' {,'• A �� + � r.. Stu: R:('., % 1 V+�.y','�Y ,� '�r.��1 } �• +rd` _ F �lS't/'y f �, ^ F •• 'A' w ��# '.r�'. `�,.�• fi�1 � ' A.— .;„v, � 4 a t,.�'"a „� �•'Q,r fi#M1�• L �'�'rd�a� r' ,,� a 4:7�Y ��.y�t 1 on, �k'1 �1 X s. 11 �'�!*.�y� ^ems.. .�F. f/j��'.l( L -y�c '� v,�_ 1�"�EZ f��y '� '`I M)��: i.FNA*'!•,�d,yr?�: fa ,4.w1'N y i` r,,.'f.,'T � •', I/ fir! �, If.• "f ' `'.y P 1r Y�Y M!>/�' 'W'h �{ ` dnf" k � x� 'j�1 t elf l�hMA i, ANO t�.r�G� r � ;+ ux 9►°1+���p�'' _... - �jaF' 'r_ r' rh< 5r,'•'�, .�,a I �v�'�'t'`1 �� , ,x'� ... ! !e 7}(! f CC ri �r S yy p�� � , A¢ ! `•., ;� _`j,•' a..y .,Pa���a,,,,ai}"�! rc` '4T/y. r h? yfy Fwf��;�� 'a' .�.�i � 14 x' r4 � J!j;S,� i / 7 .P. � '•ti"t �"1.��+�•q Y h „f.r /r'� 4 yr � 'Nk y �1t.�e.. ... ... r. Y y KhY �yltwl �+'' � a «' ,S(I�� 'a `�'� f�.Yfridi >r-•s#V�a°u,` �w rSf r� s�'irMr �e ,� _ i + �. 9 mr• 1 '.J t i, � 1: _, � , j/ .� �M. ,� � �t((�,��'���"1 f ,e r�,. l.x.•��„• _..,."�- `�- y J,� ,.� �9r1#k'" ..'w�n.U' U �.. Y�t''r"� y�� � '' I t �'•'� ''�u41�k;:�7� rye.. .�C'��-� � �"�'�{1. ?•cr,'' '�� * ,'S,�y,�' ��/�{;y '+Nf. j ',�:^ �y {S"°'..•H'.fJ. � �,Y C�i "C,rat w. .l - i 'P � �P 1'M '<" �_ jjj4 M « •if l��,>.� j-.•4,e.:1 t' y4T'7'�If �'•/a I..'y+.yl 9'�� dt �{'�Y�/�' - « � �4'� A,�t 1 P },.�.'r. wfy����v ,}rt.l �'• ,� e_ �^Y "'4 .�1��TjlYt � '�4 1✓{�i #yr- j�+ ll�i^ 1 N; �j�, � '�^�,'' '��' �` �•' �� � C «el � ,�„r ' � � + .�, r •may , f h'': ��• ) � r + i.. � t. •.����;,� 9�1�1 a�...�'�S � ;����� � � � i�� �?Ib...�r+�M'c�n .6 IrCt:}�.,�,' �.. 14 d 'r.. . ti t n+ .' ^,!. `v a,pw3' «,$ _ i'••vtcq'7,ha t •R1'b'y..�:'� ".➢F a. "'r" ` �• j r. '4'' ro' d.. A.. M �,rrt '•, ..�.....+n. tt<.Y 1y,.. '.:✓',�""''�+ •:'� rf�'i• w!i;P'Y'M•.rA',r. a 9f b•�,•.'�'S}!°�}�PI�'.. tk•;w'3..7'� °�, �� +�I�$ ,, .�� sue. '✓� .jj't p r ,°�'� �`, ,yr tt ..Rt�¢`,�. .l_�� • � �s i1� 71 ki &W MCA +f,t��''�1 t ; `'� ► .ram' n^'.tea+'� r WT 14 • •.a, s 1 r� , ;r s ,'.•}" 'p �S ai+x.t.i�ltfR'r•'w'•art�'ftc � _ -- �9 , , r , t3� 7r� � t !..i♦•f ,',,sue Y' r �-�.4at �!'. t i���P?si - "'�1'.�:ir►. '3 R^��, r , a' �i 7' } y, .y.`✓ .p, a r :,ice y:i IN"i� 7��i1~i�h¢�}. � �?.sj�' w t+ -�v�, yr „3�I:i � .'�_ �f tt .- � ..: ,• t! �;,.` .>ty►.r x � ..:.� ��ftr`•g Sir• r r •it -,Sp�+ t3 i.,t ! p�.,' ,�s i Y }F ,•.. ,•srr } ,1 t $:•+Fw�•*� �i�'�'. r ,.D-y 'fx4.rP 'raA r� t �`�f .�,' .� � r,i � #.� SIM IA ;i y.,�. �i�•�- 3' y_t t�t:r. �11 J ._� ,.r�_ � ti i"k ?r ..A 'T K t y .�5. � .a � 5��•I� y, y �r r, �' ..LEI+fR r .At Ay Y• ♦ r`• 4 ;� � �y Yi I �• ty y_• �f' \ I j,(a[•✓ y•,; d a r�Fc�4 1�ly. • a 5• , r �JI 14 Al . 9 rr • ' ♦.r„y f) }'. J� L� + y > i `/.t +� w '+. .ri A• I'�4�• � }ia.r•� k L i t� ,y �, � 1• 1, �': ) A•Y� a/pt�, r �., \ s t'r`t • r 'r s #YH- t .z r � � A...666r r. 7s iy��-• ♦ Al P,1. t,� i, ` '\.( .+- ♦ y Dt• l id s1►. l ts� � 1, } 5 •• � �`` i < I;Rii� ��y�rp. y.! � d.' rfi �. ;'' 3j1 �.+f,: i �.. c-1 i4 I r t� f s .T♦, �' !'ti.'$'"n di !li'` ' , •F'P4� °` 'ty+/•�� / ' '6� k,�•y 's.-�i; .. tr'�-. .•'�, S '�#, ° ♦5,Y��} �t�` � +k s f �•-� ; �'" ''fit 3' irt� . s;,-. 'i `' Sf. �! ti` y .{ •; ;1 ti {;� . Ask • Ah • I I I I Na wo REM WE r . ' `��t ♦�1 �1 =a `r�l/ Imo!' �i.i: .e���;��1�•� �\ . en.TUE 1,. �, 1 7 '/,� gyp. •• '••• •�� .�r'� ri l� �• /fie.. 'v i��, a . '+ 1'' ``` . nr ♦ �/� ���z ,�S - ' • �� TI `�` \�� .�� Q�,•``�•-' , •� L 1. �♦ nil t .I/ii/I ti� � �T/� e ♦ T�+���� of � fll��i� �� i� �lI fi, 1 hl".W-4 MWA ID \ .• ������i%�.'�'a _i►,L�;i�, ice•.;; �4�;��.►•- .,..�� •PlAbi�e �fiGi`pwfi` PH, PZC: 4s 02 vv '�cn 1 �flBarbv \ ` FAILy�f C86'Jw�cin C I a' l Baraer ! Yo. r71 , l / I • f,%�i - `.___ ____-_ __ L7t*tr�sat �Whi�rtcr �� � Z - r I Vy / ; r rtBruct Sep L7 1 O t�1 Est: �R��r \ t ► J h� -- - - - - - -�- - - a 71 c °J- X, \.c / _ !%•wry / / �_� ?''zZy / . S�7�001- C�J FSlrn �7 jolt ex �Cfb4c .d.n.rrL • O Irr ) arc -��/ •II )) ' •/` // l /O S..rQLl. Nr ! � -J�• �/pC�'jn(T.'%, �n4J � �G^�G'.•r"SY�'ro a/D /! j I S t ATO. oe ' �r-S7r...�{lo,;li �_' k�K•.l'a�r \ � r �/�G.//ozli.rtcr t I[nt �Sie�b i o � o': •✓KiI� - _ --r------ -- ----�-__ _`�� \\ - / sBJ'irrcc - --- / °o \// eClo/m,r.rEel. Sh / 9y C •i: unn�ls / G� �� �f�• :� fro ;fir olv tv- pock �.-- o 1� / LGyyptt.��C r p N . H:Grarct• e�car-, r � :ad7`r� .r r ..jj• 1 upazmcr.I•OTcrrY `SFr �_/Q��� •// — I���'t, / `� `� � -\• w"JBrz:r" it .� � - � - o(7rf[il •� G[a CiTfrrC r ��' � // �Q /l•I.Grant J` .T 1 SOUTH WINDSOR HISTORICAL SOCIETY I( ��'E' __.._.__._........_._.....__..._.__._.__..._.._ .. . ._._...._._.._.._.._._.___._..._.._.._:__..._. _.. .�._.._._.,__._...._'_-•• WTI laid '� 3' L Vol. V-7 U 766 STATE OF CONNECTIC T DISTRICT OF ELLINGTON i I, ELSIE M. NEFF, Clerk of the Court of Probate for the 31 . ,r District of Ellington, in said State, and keeper of the seal therebf, do certify that it appears from the records and files of this Court that WARREN PUDIM died a resident of Vernon in said District on the 6th day of December, 1965, testate, leaving a will which, was duly ad- ' « ) mitted to probate by said Court on the 7th day of February, 19,66; that on the 7th day of February,. 1966, letters testamentary under the will h i of said deceased were issued to Edward Pudim, the executor named in said will; that on the 7th day of. February, 1966, by decree as of record,. will more fully appear, said Court limited and allowed six months thereafter for the presentation of all claims against said deceased* to the executor of said estate and directed that public notice of +. said limitation be given as by statute required; that after the expi- ration of said six months said executor filed in Court 'an administration!:^ account and other returns, which have been accepted by the Court, from :• which it appears. that public notice of such limitation was given as directed in said order and that all claims against said deceased presents to said executor within said time limited have either been paid, set— t, f due tled or barred by law, and that all succession or inheritance taxes ti a the •State of Connecticut have been fully paid and satisfied. I further certify that under the will of said deceased, all y+ the rest, residue and remainder of said estate is given, devised and bequeathed, to AUGUST PUDIM of Vernon, Conn., brother of said deceased, {I to be his absolutely and forever. Ire•, "�, ; I And I further certify that according to the records of this i Court, said rest, residue and remainder contains an undivided one-half,'? tl 'I' interest in and to, certain pieces or parcels of land with all ,the ' •k:i buildings thereon, situated and being partly.in the Towns of'South ill �i Windsor, East Windsor and Vernon, the first two towns being located IF� ! in the ',Cour_ty of Hartford and the third town in the County of Tolland,'! .I all in the State of Connecticut; and being more particularly bounded I and described as follows, to wit: I tiA' R ' ;r- t I ; FIRST PIECE: (In South Windsor) , �: art,• — — — i •� North by land now of one Gedrim, formerly of one Lane; f i East by highway; vGt South by land now or formerly of one Rothe; and . West by land now or formerly of one Skinner N' ' and containing nine (9) acres,, more or less, Being part of the premises conveyed by Olds & Whipple, Inc. I , )' to John Pudim, •Jr. and Warren Pudim by Quit-Claim Deed dated September 29', 1936. OND PIECE: (In South Windsor) North by an old highway; East by-land now or formerly of one Rothe; i South and West by other land of John Pudim, Jr. and Warren P`adim. Being part of the premises conveyed by Olds & Whipple, Inc. yto John Pudim, Jr. and Warren Pudim by Quit-Claim Deed dated September Ci 99, 1936. '^ IRD PIECE:—_ (In East.Windsor) North by land now or formerly of one Demikat; East by land now or'formerly of one Brache, r. . South by the Highway; and West by •land now or formerly of one Crane and the Highway, d containing seventy-seven (77) acres, more or less, including the ' rber Hill School House and land. Being the same premises conveyed to John Pudim, Jr. and Warren Pudim by Quit-Claim Deed from Olds &'Whipple, Inc. dated September 29, 1936 and recorded in the East Windsor Land Records in -Volume 50, Page 539 and by Quit-Claim Deed from the Town of East �Nindsor dated October 14, 1942. ! ;z The Third Piece is conveyed subject to whatever rights the ! ,public may have to use the highway running through, the property.. �jbs hOURTH PIECE: (In Vernon) -IortFierly by land now or formerly of Anton Brown, Jr. t being Section B of Vernwood Farm, so-called, in all, six hundred forty-one and forty-eight one hundredths 641.48 feet; Easterlyb land owned now or formerly 'Y rmerly by St. John's. Episcopal Church; Southerly by the north boundary of Tolland Turnpike, so- called, being also known as Connecticut Route No. 30; South-westerly by the curve of the arc of the intersection of the north boundary of said Connecticut Route 4 ! ; No. 30 and Merline Road, so-called, thirty-one.' I and ninety one-hundredths (31.-90) feet; and Westerly by Merline Road, so-called, four hundred thirteen and sixty-five'one-hundredths (413.65) feet; and tt Northwesterlyb the I y h curve of the arc of the intersection of , Merline Road and Vernwood Drive, thirty and eight one-hundredths (30.08) feet. and containing six and fifty-four one-hundredths (6.54) acres.' and being the remaining portion,of those Certain premises con- +, veyed to John Pudim, Jr. and Warren Pudim by the Society for Savings h by deed dated March 12, 1937 and recorded in the Vernon Land Records ! ' � 1n'Volume 69, page 311, to which referenC'e may,be had. r � 4 ._.......... . ... _;. ..._.. ._ rh,Y I heaves Z6'� A� ' r, r., 0 , l� e _ ,t f3 e5 t 5 � ` � y w sec „ Jf36 Z I ' 3 — FIFTH PIECE. (In South Windsor) North by land now or formerly of the Estate of j! Adrienne E. Lane; ?, r 1 • East by the Highway; ., 2 South by land formerly of John Brien and subsequently 'of Catherine� Dacy;West by land now or formerly of the-Jewish Agricultural and Industrial Aid Society, and land formerly of t Israel Silberman and subsequently of one Palozzie, { ; in part.by each. S, j SIXTH PIECE: (In South Windsor) i Northerly by land now or formerly of Thomas Skinner; ; Easterly by land formerly of Edward Miller and subsequently by Bruno Rothe; rt' :�.. , Southerly and Westerly by Highways ;h Said Fifth and Sixth Pieces being the First and Second Pieces .-'4 described in an Administrator's Deed from the Estate of John Pudim to John Pudim, Jr. and Warren Pudim, dated July 1, 1942 and recorded in the South Windsor Land Records in Volume 39, Page 531, to Which refer V ence may be had. j .a SEVENTH PIECE: (In South Windsor) DNortherly by land now or formerly of Merrit Doane, Edward Miller and the Highway, in part by each; Easterly by land now or formerly of Merrit Doane :and the Highway, in part by each; Southerly by land now or formerly of David Tornansky et al, formerly of Felix La Cross, and Westerly by ,the highway and containing ninety t90) acres, more or less; Being the some premises described in a Warranty Deed dated aY, February 18, 1938 from The Apothecaries Hall Company to John Pudim, J Jr. and Warren Pudim. al 1 The First, Second, Sixth and Seventh Pieces dbove described 1 are subject to a pole line easement to the Connecticut Light and Power' {r Company as of record appears. y I In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal d said ou t, at Vernon, Ij' is this � �: ddy ofECC•siC6e� , 1968. Clerk 'w 11' I, Received For Record December 5,1968 at 10:00 A.M. Hazel P. Vqn Sicklin Ass't Town Clerk I , r. I 1 ` b C ie, %,o,✓,, / �P li1�t CL j C-/ w czDA L,L.�.YQ �e.:...�� CG�c, c.✓1.E�, Q-��-..c�ce..c.� bsr/ .(,LLB, :.'�.C�-�� r�/ / N�✓�a� LJ.RX�1-�-�/ �_� U a v- nL&I AD c 2- l�vc/�—,,—�1��Q e v CC.ZLZ Lt, � �;�02 a y � �(�, � a. !D• Ci,u.c,G,.ti,-v�,.,,,�G C�.k a C�t�e_u�,.,q !nI-�u�., U1-( ���{a� G'�.� •,� O,Z.,,vc�.�1C- d�-� pc.�V.. /�.R. .._ ��`�.: rzL—,,t.,.-, 0-, cIL Lillv) �' v� ( Y ( (� .� y `7 /�V ll"> Wv `a-u.�.�'. C.�t.,✓�-�A.`c�.C.,...w, Ci •,. c�Cs?-.�G( Lti ��-u.�.� ")-L �t.,_0.. Lt, /�c,.. I u l .o, —J U ( ( .� C-a��ti_o l .u�. Cc. o , 6 o.�+-.J a.ya.,...�„A J..-vD-c..�-z�...W-- � _on....._,� l�A✓l� d�.,,t.� ��.3.�,_-`_`/�-Q'..o`i`^.�.__�'�cJL,�-�t/1\'�. d I LL In..-x-��,.C,/ O.-�.-� -�-.� �-�---c,�.,...2.✓1� o�.+�l c.. -°�--C<,=Y�._, O�u._.../;,..i,�.�,/�.L., L.,,,I�Q,••, }.. lif 1h�d-t,�.c�....--�: a.✓--�_.l� 6�J-�-1i9�.. U c�l,.,� c,-�.�.,.,_,_,� l-J- �-.4:� V "F-��w^-ten W- t�.k.r�-� N..A cc..� Q n.,'4✓�" c� wU .�... .. 5. *N Sf4 J O-P S_0� V. 5 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Sox•Co��� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 24, 2003 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 .R6:-Appl"01-52P, Vintage Hills IWA/CC Bond Release Dear Mr.Jacques: This-is to.advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved on November 18, 2003 to release the erosion and sediment bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of $10,000.00. Advance,arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact persons)will-be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission TW/kk cc: Town Engineer MEMORANDUM To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Date. 11/21/05 RE: Vintage Hills Subdivision (01-52P) Phase 2 Bond Reductions The Engineering Division has reviewed the request to reduce the bond for Phase 2 of the Vintage Hills subdivision to the maintenance level. We have inspected the work in Phase 2 and found it to be substantially complete. Therefore we recommend that this bond amount be reduced to the maintenance level of $27,710 for phase 2 of the project. Please call me if you have any questions. OWN 'S 9 O � W F R-CO 1540SULLIVAN AVENUE (!/ ' SOUTI r Wr2 AREA CODE I /OF', CONN. 06074 644-2511 November 23, 2005 Mr. John Jacques Jacques Construction, LLC 67 Ridge Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Jacques: Re: Appl#01-52P, Vintage Hills Subdivision Reduction This is to reduce then u'Se You that t to maintenance expire on esubdivision bond o annIn November 22, 20% a Maintenanc e le eCof fission voted Please forwardl of$27 7 00 on November 22, 2005 to an 10. The maintena Your earliest co amendment nce bond will nvenience. to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at Si -�rely! Patrick Ke ' --�. P�pmm Planning Zony Ing Commission cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE 'FOR SITE & SUBDIVISI6N GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON itichard Msrtel Phone No. -' " ' Address 16S South PAW, South Windsor CT 06074 Site Name Vint&= H111a subdivision P&Z No 01-5 Owner .T Corsstrtaian, LW Phone 4 Contractor i Signature of Owner Date: - , Signature of Desi Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) ftowisuration Of late 80, 9 and 10 z Reason for Change: (Why. is change required) To faailitate,WKWU transfer APPROVALS: (As Required) Dr. Of Planning '' Dates Town Engineer 14U4Date: 3127,101 Dir. of Public W ks Date: Others Date: STAFF COMMENTS } White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod- Engineering Department`