Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Spec Exe/Site Plan of Development
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Iola" APPLICATION FORM V � ® ��; •�, C Application No. �C,-�k!� Official Receipt Date: 7-H-66 Receipt No: APPLICANT: .C a •SOu.c�?r SCE � ADDRESS: 176 Smith Street South Windsor CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: K.F. Properties, L.L.C./Walter P. & Lucyna Kebalo ADDRESS: 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 176 Smith Street & 188 Smith Street ASSESSOR'S MAP # 17 PARCEL # 1&2 ZONE A-20 NAME, ADDRESS, TEL& FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie, Principal, Design Professionals, Inc. 165 S. Satellite Rd. South Windsor, CT 06074 Tel. 291-8755 Fax 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑Minor ❑ Major Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ® Special Exception to Article 4.1 _1 . (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑ Other(explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days ` �) � � prior to being heard by the Commission. / Signature of Applicant Signature of Property Owner (See reverse side for additional information) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS SUBDMSIONS/RESUBDMSIONS APPLICANT_ 'erg L I_L_ PROJECT NAME L) I r ESQ Sul d\41'�,'by\ This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E/L.S) declaring that all required information is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied. Subdivision Minor Regular I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION A. General Information 1. Appl. & owner name, address x x �/ 2. Engineer &land surveyor name address license no. 9 Y , &seal x x 3. Keyma at 1" = 100'scale showing location of tract P 9 with reference to surrounding properties, streets, municipal boundaries, etc., within 500'. Key map must include: x x a. Outline of buildings. b. Layout of streets c. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500 feet. d. Names of abutting property owners. e. open Proposed o aces and recreation areas. P _ f. Driveway cuts on abutting properties and any properties ac_ross from proposed site a y Subdivision Minor Regular g. Distance to and name of nearest intersection street. _;,,/—4. A schedule of.required and provided zoning district requirements including lot area, lot frontage, lot depth,yard setbacks, open space. variances granted, etc. x x 5. North arrow and scale. x x 6. Appropriate certification block. x x 7. Date of original drawing and all revisions. x x 8. Name of development. - x x B. / Plot plan at I" = 40'scale an standard 18"x 24' or 24" x / 36"sheets with a 1/2' ruled margin containing the 'v following data. Developments which require more than two 24" x 36" sheets may submit the plot plan at 1" = 100' scale. x x 1. Metes and bounds description showing dimensions, bearings, curve data, length of tangents, radii, arcs, chords, and central angles for all centerlines and rights-of-way, and centerline curves on streets. Monuments are required at comers and angles of all new streets and new street lines, at all points of curvature and tangency, and at critical comers and angles of all new Town open space. Coordinates for monuments shall be in tabular form. x x -,-/2. CGS datum shall be used on all subdivisions accessible to controls. The Town Engineer shall determine the accessibility of these controls. 3. Lot layout numbers, square footage of all lots, and all lot dimensions. Iron pins are required at all property angle points. No lots shall be divided on 2 sheets. x x V4. Yard setbacks dimensioned. x x _,_75. Easements, noting grantors, grantees and purpose. x x Subdivision Minor Regular 6. Development phasing, if proposed. x x 7 . Names of abutting property.owners. x x 8. Proposed street names (use approved list of names). x x /9. All open space reserved for common or public uses. x x 0. Appropriate A-2 certification & LS seals. x x H Topographic map at same scale as plot plan containing all data in uded on the plot plan plus the following: i. All existing structures, streets,wetlands and existing watercourses;or other environmentally structs sensitive areas, including enough data streets x beyond property boundaries to allow a wetlnds reasonable evaluation of the property's fldpin ecological relationship to surrounding areas, 100 yr. floodplain.> x 2. Existing and proposed contours to extend a x sufficient amount beyond subject property, to determine the effects on the property as follows town mapping): 100' x ( up to 3% grade: 1'contour interval 3% grade &over; 2'contour interval /3. Boundary limits, nature, and extent of wooded areas, specimen trees, and other significant physical features. x x .,/4. Existing system of drainage of subject site and of any larger tract or basin of which it is a part (can use Town stormwater x x study). -7 5. Drainage area map. * x 6. Drainage calculations * x 7. Perc test data, preliminary indication of septic system feasibility if individual sanitary * x sewerage systems provided. Subdivision Minor Regular 8. Proposed utility infrastructure plans, including Jsanitary sewer. water, storm water management. * X 9. Spot and finished elevations at all property comers, comers of all structures or dwellings, or proposed first floor elevations x x 10. Construction details (per standard specs.) * x 11. Road and paving cross-sections (per, standard specs). * x 12. Proposed street names. x f p x J 13. Landscape plan and details. x x J14. Site identifications signs, traffic control signs, and directional signs. * x 15. Sight triangles at new road intersections. * x NO pro\: 16. Sight triangles at driveway entrance x x (where there may be a question).. I 17. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns (less detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan, and general plan of development. * x III . Plans and profiles (1" = 40'horizontally and 1" = 4'vertically) showing the following: x Ja. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. x b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, and partial lot lines x v Subdivision Minor Regular c. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades, all tangent grades, and all vertical curve information x d. Profile will show all catch basin s and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage pipe material to be described. x e. Typical/critical cross-sections where grading is outside street right-of-way or is at street right- of-way. x f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook, sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. x g. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including pipe material, elevations, sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for habitable buildings shall be shown. * x 15. Traffic report(by traffic engineer) ��16. Open space site improveme t plan. * x 17. Architectural elevations/information per Sect. 4.20 of the zoning regulations * - if required by Town Engineer ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION. -� Date Plan Preparer (PE/ June 18, 1998 #` 09/01/2000 41 $602918757 DPI PAGE 06 10. Y :` w41ter .: �pba�kot 176sue;;. ;;>s .� �:t. soil h...1 fb1 sous 'o • .. a!� =; ;13'dsor ` 1540 au � -Door I at Of -t dev'ei o , to IL re o� to � wlo & slrWb are. '0 3 i::•a. saves lass now . a ':.bet : 71x1t':..csl'.1a `:;'I�ed'fi�Ie'� The ; :v. .:.. o �. bees ~coo ;tot to R�dfi�' � �iica7�o;'�otita. we `lbavo 'raguea'ed design ;.for ast® i,`.pi a i$,maxi '1 als ..to : :ur p+rogsrty.•. 13�ae Wo ae�ed.,.; o:'�► a-13 .this:' �c ttbli. .li Soon ate':.. satbiQ, so got to'` !. i�s'tcrt I ; ii° 1 ":the otn 3 ft-` And -paving a�`'l�q., k*,,Court. .No vi .l be "king;., t•.. +qu appE this: 90AII :axteasiaa r T, t aaeda= ,,. ov'a1= t<7:: hf. ,•t ... e.:•�r31, " be.seekinq.W:F.C.iL. �pprotita ; ` :'ii•''; future r.�. have .a.'dsys �vv"nt . p�aa. T�at�k You..; " VOLI tor ' emc ,78T�: ira� OiW4li brand tan Vanrtn►t1:Y, , G: :1 # 09/01/2000 11:41 $602918757 DPI PAGE 05 0' sF. SrTE. .:CGB'.. '• ENERAL:' Phone' No. <.91 ACT PERSQ�i: ? ,�� OF 74- �,<' Address &Z 00 .y,, O Site 'Na :: Phone No•: • �1_ ,.4•�. , s Owner. Contractt.;:;< o� :. f Date:: a �, :.,: �•:.;. Si at e: :. Date': gygnat ; o: :Q ga9'n En ,y. :�~' ' ' g ;` Include .� ! ;'+ • . ' !" chef . ., dr q location :. 4,rD GE:.,.�T .,:' oChinge% ) J�a l.pro. X..e': . Copies . ; >,', � Tee. ` IIAWIWI g`.Z' ; ry whyi : tnge:.'reirerl), Reason fo . Ch+�n AE,' t�J squired) Date 'Di.r,. Of a' ; rix► r<1 ;�. Date T Eng: @er p x fit, O rks r.. �.:•:j'', � ••:,• Deft , .Other t STAFF COY3N 'S V i1' •I �1:'..�•: ' I w' f White TowXi; girieer nk Di'r+� . ''pr of P1.t7i ►c ` a P lQ t. yelloai T 6 09/01/2000 �1:41 9602918757 DPI PAGE 07 i . , h hl �iyA ''AVSNUICJNOSdR. CpNN. p+6074 1 '`r Au u8t 13', 1952 ®�O dt CT •. Dear'?' '. & l �.o ' n81On sh o� t .exte ::;;: ti� iu . •fl``�� 1. �h e x u.. 1 t 9 In z'ey 'a iX ?'. . tilt. wet maid :w ;' }i'3;zi:' 'ths�:<"Rsc 'field • 'lro ject ' ors Drake Court ry :• '':� t'a' the: i :a 11-sewer plah' and, not r i, u ."' p£�. o'A $ :.�. P''C 'A X " ht7i`os�m Adfield' P. roj BCtthn e or bef ore.•aP rod by .W1 t �. �; itista ; e1' k1"Ipf: sa iti � �tensoA :, s wor3c 1,s' ursued .. St1Ql11C�.>s' LliT ®l�',9O;Od;', tht ' 3.. P .:' ify 'Town approval of'. ,e ,Furt w `: .er s aw ;; ] : and'':'des.'::,riot:': {<,. as u''havg a' t 'furthee 1: ;:. •'fee to go.;}t:: : t::'tYe off: .c.e .;�`,� Y. ,Pleas fQer;�::;; oat-aml ' ' of Pu Ass. +} _ •t Dy ac i71 tta:, Posh�t'bFp,('IO 0.-tr8tArnitmi 111®f110 �:' '�e?��plff,;►'•"'j.',. for 101. w 09/01/2000 �1:41 9602918757 DPI PAGE 12 k! ! 0 SOUTH IRINDS.OR I.+' .. � ,i • . �' I �CF.' SLTE',CH�NGE..:; wFll. .. GENERAL:: Phone No: i� 35 CHANGE; ONTAr,T PESQ3�1,y;= ssi ' rest Ad P&Z N.Q. Site 0LO �� �•' • . . , �. . Phone NQ. tGZ .' .' Owner Gam., ' � ;� • •' �' w �T nil . � ,. �• Contr.j% t;or. Date: t gnae a 1er :a;..:. Date: ) gi'gna � e• A s r 3a l'ocati:o aid.'mature of 'chcn, •` Include h copies;off:,plant prof.i:1®• of C age. ) ��'.. • ' our.; '•.t ) . . .. s; •;,: � •n o,X Q Y�'.. �'! 4ii1�6iU61 MKa�. i "r �r e' rep eat r�, Reason Oht1 (Tahy APPROVAL$ .:r�.A 'rlequired) 1 ..r Dir.. Of. h' .i. Date: :.; Date h Town Engi;Pver:•`,.•.:: X Date: Dir. of P��li. E F Other: Date STAFF C N •' IRI- n WhiteYei'low Alicant :A Pink - jreCt� 1 of .PianrtiN Goldenrdc� ' Engineering Department 5. r 09/01/2000 11:41 $602918757 DPI PAGE 13 "I TF YQ�C7.. BLE ' O .' SitE 'J['TG, FIPE CALL BERNICE �.• RUS54�;' 4= :1�'EXT. 243 B -4.30 P.M ( l `T ;a]; Y OF THE MEETING' ;>.. AZ ER pL :TL'It3NQO�L AIORITY To:. :'OF'SOIJT�i�KiNb ( k 7.30 P.M. REGI7T, ,,R JANUARY 7, 1997 SPR T0.. ':HA- — ` I~ — .... 777 (A►). ALL : TCE'OF Nb*N S op—PRIM.op-pRIM. OUS.1vIE,gjWGS r 3, 1996 SLI :'' r r•1 •�7]� c rY'j' °^'�'�' '.l ►eft •��_�'J �/� MvV I Ce-Court,- p Qv�al for. a�in'Bne'se�rex<extensiori. F: . royal to bif rsdental usrs:::lgrecus unbilled) - __ - f ,' .;E p royal of pre is a"fa. :�fof se1v01r'assess a it - 170 Strong Road. 4?G Alt.Road • Pg va :to ruff m sewer:v is charge ' "Y. 880 Ellington Road "'Ag royal'for resin i itial:sewer connectiph (D) . Q1V CATION '' :REPORTS,r (E) I: ;': TICIPA7�" 01' :.r( ts not:oi:agenda)';'; (F) PILL l`!� ANGE ORDERS, i�ISBURSE1ti�ENTS. D`.BUSI1cS5'', (H) O'i'Ip O GO ( ,. ESSIONIt .L7ISCUSS-PEN ING N. 11v' ; s "ij pjO[�. NMENT �r ' a c 09/01/2000 1:41 $G02919757 DPI PAGE 14 XN i- irav+w.wom+.sa+�.tari ww� R. OF 'SOUTH,•:WINDSOR" SF SITE CHANGE; Pt1R-`.SITE' & •`$UBDI'VISION'''.. -GENERAL.-', x CHANG ' ,ORDER rONTACT PERS MrjEj:„�iGa3.' spa .Phone No. 7�1 • t •� Addre�� �Tf1 •A:: U1r G , • P&Z No. ---------- Site Owner. R1L.' 't Phone Nd. �.a2 Q�.-zS contrl,ptor• 'SMS ,� .Gn: L►c. e Si.gna: z •o'fwner Dstes5127 �- - !. � ... Signa ,}t e, .cif• esign Eng .•.1'� :..: ate... 4 ORANGE: . ��'�•cZ ;�� location ,ans n tznclude 'our' .'�' ) copies !of�: p'lan/prafii'e of thazige. ) P'Pa0v i 1 Reason fq Changh e (Why is lian.ge required) , tea -v �►� . .. . C APPROVAL (Asequir d) 'I 'Dir. ' Of - nnin ! �f�. Date: f� �. . � 9 Town Ehg4ppe : a Date: Dir.. 'of li ;ks Date: ' Oth6r: .a L' ,�di Date: ; ,STAFF CO s. L VRO U RJ" E !cJ .L a55c1 IT Y x White - 'own, -En '_neer Xellow --:Applicant • Pink rectbj, of Planb,'�` g:. Goldenrod T:,•.Engineering Department �,. �tpwN 8F44 R s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 e•co AREA CODE 860 /6"-2511 January 4, 2000 r Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re:Preconstruction Meeting—Appl 00-28P Wheeler Estates SRD IN ATTENDANCE See attached sheet. The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in 121ace prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Smith Street. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. 4. A$5,000 Erosion and Sedimentation bond is due prior to earth moving and a$5,200 bond for the establishment of detention basin is to be placed. 5. Detention basin must be fully stable before water from storm water structure can be discharged into it, Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The* Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist required for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six(6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete,two (2) inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used-- storm pipe, structures,pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures(if necessary) of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval at least one week prior to paving and after subgrade formation. 9. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. 10. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 11. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Andy Kebalo in the field at phone#644-5124(883-1391cell phone). 12. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 13. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 14 Forty-eight(48)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 15. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 16. _ Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. 5:00 .m. no w P p ork on Sunday. 17. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 19. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore,the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 20. Inspection of gravel access roads required prior to placement of topsoil. 21. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as-builts. 22. For concrete sidewalks, 8"depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk is constructed before lot development,the locations must be indicated on the as-built plans. If a proposed driveway location is moved,the sidewalk must be removed to the nearest expansion joint and rebuilt to the proper depth with reinforcement. 23. If a concrete monument is located within a driveway, a cast iron frame and cover must be provided for town public improvement specifications. 24. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals, the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. 25. During construction for individual house lots, lot to lot drainage must be addressed with drainage swales as necessary. For lawn establishment, town staff will be requiring erosion control measures to be installed prior to the issue of the certificate of occupancy to ensure soil stabilization. A detailed erosion control plan must be implemented and depicted on the plot plan for review prior to the issuance of the building permit—most particularly on lots with extensive grading. 26. Drain layer and street excavation permits are required. Planning Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. Restricted use easement must be filed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting(if required) to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal Police Services L Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Karl Reichle,Public Works Mel Stead,Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control CL&P SNET Stormwater Management Plan Wheeler Estates & Wheeler Subdivision South Windsor, Connecticut ,�`',0* tr+ L (c ,C So, Prepared by Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06014 DPI Project No.98-1110 June 15,2000 RECEIVED JUN Rn 2000 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Background 1 Proposed Development 1 Off-Site Analysis 2 Peak Runoff control 2- Riparian Buffers 2 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Storm-water Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 2 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 Infiltration Basin Design 5 On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations 6 On-Site Water Quality Measures 6 Conclusions 6 Appendices Site Location Map A TR-55 (Existing) B TR-55 (Developed) C Hydrographs Developed to Basin D Detention Basin Design E Routing through Basin F TR-55 (Infiltration Basin) G Hydraflow—Drywell Impoundments H Drywell Impoundments Summary I Storm Sewer Calculations J Drainage Area Maps Back of Report Introduction: The proposed development is to consist of a six-lot subdivision, and the development of 25 Senior.Residences with a community building on approximately 11.9 acres of land. The site consists of two parcels, and is located on the north side of Smith Street in South Windsor, Connecticut. The site is located adjacent to the intersection of Wheeler road and Smith Street. A site location map is included in Appendix A. Background: The site presently consists of two parcels of land. There are presently two single-family homes, (one on each of the parcels). There are three driveways to Smith Street from the two sites. Also located on the site are an older barn,and a green house. To the rear of the site there is an open field, and forested areas. A stream tuns through the northern end of the site, and generally the site drains from south to north to this stream. To the north and east of the site are undeveloped areas. To the west of the site is an existing residential development. Proposed Development: The proposed development of the site is to consist of the installation of a 600-foot cul-de-sac that would service 6 single-family lots,and would provide access to a twenty five-unit senior residence facility. The development of the senior residence facility would include installation of access driveways,parking areas, and a community building. The storm-water management system for the site will consist of a number of elements that in combination will mitigate the impacts of the development on the storm-water runoff from the site. The majority of the site will drain into a series of catch basins that will collect the runoff from the entrance road,parking and driveway areas, and a portion of the lawn and roofs of the senior residence units. The runoff that is collected in the catch basins will be discharged into a proposed detention basin that will discharge to the stream running through the northern end of the site. The proposed detention basin has been designed to detain the 2-100 year design storms at or below existing discharge rates. The basin will have a high level overflow for flows in excess of the 100-year storm event. The detention basin will outlet to the north through a 24"RC pipe,and impact basin. The peak discharge rates under developed conditions will be less than under existing conditions. The detention basin will also act as a water quality basin Over half of the roofs of the senior residence units and some surrounding lawn areas will discharge into a series of drywell structures on the site. The drywells will provide recharge of the groundwater. Off-Site Analysis: The design of the proposed on-site storm-water drainage system has been completed with the goal of providing no increase in peak runoff from the site,and in providing infiltration of storm-water for groundwater recharge. As such,no negative impacts to off-site facilities is anticipated. Peak Runoff Control: The majority of the site development will drain to the proposed detention basin. The basin will provide mitigation of peak storm-water flows. The design of the detention basin is outlined on pages 4 through 6 of this report. Riparian Buffers: Buffers consisting of natural and additional vegetative plantings will be maintained on the north,west,south, and east sides of the proposed senior residence development. Natural vegetation exists on the proposed 6 single-family building lots also. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the subdivision and site plan design. These measures include the following: l. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of silt fence around catch basins. 4. Use of the detention basin during construction as a sediment basin. 5. Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 6. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 7. Installation of construction entrance pads,and sweeping of roadways as needed. 8. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality:A number of water quality measures have been integrated into the site design to provide for treatment of the stormwater runoff from the site. These include the installation of catch basin sumps, and the use of the proposed detention basin as a water quality basin. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to a detention basin. The piped drainage system has been designed to accommodate the runoff from a 10 Yr design storm. The detention basin has been designed to handle the runoff from a 100-year design storm through the outlet,and larger storm events through the emergency overflow weir. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site discharge to the north will be to the existing stream channel. Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water Detention Basin System. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide, and additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system. Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. -- Catch Basins: The catch Basins shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reaches 1'. Pavement Sweeping: The parking lots within the senior residence facility shall be swept at a minimum of twice per year. Once in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season, and once in the fall after the leaves have fallen. Outlet Structure: The detention basin outlet structure shall be inspected twice annually,and all debris and silt shall-be removed. The discharge point from the outlet system shall be inspected also,and all silt and debris shall be removed. The riprap at the discharge shall be re-arranged and additional stone added as needed. All silt and debris shall be disposed of at a suitable location. Emergency Spillway: The stone spillway shall be inspected twice yearly. All large woody growth that may affect the flow of water or the stability of the spillway shall be removed. The spillway shall also be inspected after any flow passes through it. The riprap shall be re-arranged and added to as required to maintain the design as per the design plans. Topographic Contour Maps: Topographic contour maps have been provided showing the drainage areas for the site at a scale of 1"=100'. The maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included in the rear of this report. Floodplain Boundaries: There are no floodplain boundaries on the site. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The flood routing and detention and infiltration basins modeling was completed utilizing the Hydroflow Hydrographs for Windows computer program by Intelisolve. The drainage piping on site was designed using the rational formula. Under existing conditions, the site drains to the north. The TR-55 calculations for the existing runoff to the north are contained in appendix B. The summary of the results is as follows: II Design Storm Peak Discharge(CFS) 2 year 3 10 year 9 25 year 13 50 year 17 100 year 20 Under developed conditions, the site was designed to drain to the north to the proposed detention basin The TR-55 analysis for the discharge to the basin is included in appendix C. Due to the inclusion of the infiltration basins, the area of runoff under developed conditions is less than under existing conditions. The summary of the existing, and developed conditions discharges to the detention basin are as follows for the 2-100-year storm event: Design Storm Exist. Peak Discharge(CFS) Developed Peak Discharge(CFS) 2 year 3 5 10 year 9 12 25 year 13 17 50 year 17 21 100 year 20 25 Appendix D contains the hydrographs for the runoff to the basin for the 2 through 100- year storm events. The detention basin has been designed to contain the 2-100 year storm events within the basin, and to discharge at a rate less than or equal to the peak rate of runoff to the north under existing conditions. Storm events up to and including the 100-year storm event will discharge from the basin through 2 orifices, and the outlet pipe. Storms in excess of the 100-year storm event would discharge through- a catch basin top on the outlet structure. In event that the outlet structure becomes clogged, or for very large storms, a riprap emergency spillway has also been provided. The design of the detention basin is included in appendix E. The hydrograph routings of the 2-100 year design storms through the detention basin are included in appendix F. A summary of the existing and post developed drainage discharges from the detention basin are as follows: Storm Event Existing Discharge(CFS) Developed Discharge(CFS) 2 year 3 2.1 10 year 9 8.6 25 year 13 11.5 50 year 17 14.3 100 year 20 20.5 Infiltration Basin Design: The on-site infiltration basins have been designed to contain and infiltrate the runoff from the selected portions of the site in a relatively short period of time. Runoff from portions of the roofs of the senior residence units and limited surrounding lawn areas will be directed into the infiltration basins.- Each of the infiltration basins consists of one or two pre-cast concrete drywells, and a surface impoundment area above the drywell. The volume of the drywell and surface impoundment has been designed to totally contain the runoff for up to the 100-year design storm. For the 100-year design storm, the longest duration of standing water above ground within the impoundment areas would be approximately 32 hours. The maximum depth of impoundment for a 100-year design storm is 2.3 feet. The infiltration areas have been designed based on information obtained from a series of deep hole test pits conducted on site. The soil conditions were determined including restrictive layers, indications of high water, and groundwater elevations at time of testing. Soil samples were taken in each of the test pits, and permeability tests were conducted on the soil samples. Based on this information, permeability rates were calculated for the soils on the site. The soils on site were found to have permeability rates ranging from 25 to 75 feet per day. A permeability rate of 25 feet per day was used for the analysis. In order to be conservative on these calculations, it was assumed that the groundwater would only enter the ground through the drywell, and no water would percolate into the ground from the surface impoundments above the drywells. The runoff from each of the sub-areas draining to the}individual drywells and associated surface impoundment areas has been calculated using the TR-55 computer program. The results are included in appendix G. BLDG 1 includes the drainage from units 1, 2, and part of 3. Bldg lb-2a includes the remainder of unit 3, 4, 5, and part of.6. Bldg 2b-3a includes the remainder of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and part of 11. Bldy 6 includes part of unit 22, 23,24, and 25. All of the drywells collect runoff from some adjacent lawn areas also. The Hydroflow routing design for each basin are included in appendix H. The infiltration from the drywell impoundment areas was modeled in a similar fashion as a detention basin outlet would be modeled, and is based on the permeability rates calculated previously. The summary of the Hydroflow hydrographs for the infiltration from the drywells is included in appendix I. On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations: The storm sewer calculations for the storm piping within the proposed subdivision roadway are included in appendix J. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the rational formula. On-Site Water Quality Measures: The site design encompasses a number of water quality design elements. The infiltration basins on site will provide direct recharge of storm-water into the ground and therefore lower the volume of runoff from the site. The detention basin has been designed to provide an additional 1' of storage volume below the outlet elevation. Based on the groundwater measurement at the test pit in this location, it is anticipated that the basin will remain wet during periods of the year. This wet basin area will provide water quality mitigation for runoff from the site Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated water quality and detention.basin is expected to mitigate any potential impacts from the development of the site both due to increase of runoff, and water runoff quality. The infiltration basins will provide infiltration of a portion of the runoff from the site. APPENDIX A �7Y q@ C Pvt) E11JN070N AD SO ROAD ROAD AW 1 \ two ORANDVEW TERRACE I AK PA �Q NES PN) )o 4 1r f E SI TE Wr .� COURT V ./•• � ��p CWRT �... ^ _ �"ov .� d Q •\ � �. LANE(PM)Ld, RD DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : KEBALO User: GBS Date: 06/13/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING Subarea : 1 Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 75% — 2.07(61) — - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways — .58(98) — — OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Pasture, grassland or range fair — 3.3(69) — — Woods — grass combination fair — 1.3(65) — — Woods good — 3.2(55) — — Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 10.4 SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 10 .45 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 64* * — Generated for use by GRAPHIC method D TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : KEBALO User: GBS Date: 06/13/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: EXISTING Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) Sheet 3.2 150 .024 F 0.306 Shallow Concent'd 880 .028 U 0.091 Time of- Concentration = 0.40* Sheet Flow Surface Codes A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense Shallow Concentrated B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda Surface Codes C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass—Range, Short J Range, Natural I * — Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2. 00 Project : KEBALO User: GBS Date: 06/13/99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: - Subtitle: EXISTING Data: Drainage Area 10.45 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 64 Time of Concentration: 0.40 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24—Hr Rainfall (in) 3.2 4 .7 5.5 6.2 6.9 Ia/P Ratio 0.35 0.24 0.20 0. 18 0. 16 Runoff (in) 0.56 1.39 1.91 2.41 2 .93 Unit Peak Discharge 0.532 . 0.626 0 .645 0.657 0.667 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 3 9 13 17 20 ---------------- * — Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : PROPOSED CONDITIONS User: GBS Date: 06-22-99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: TO DETENT. BASIN Subarea : 1 Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 115% — 2 . 28(61) Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways — 2 .32(98) — — Residential districts Avg % impery (by average lot size) 1/2 acre 25 — 3 . 0(70) — — OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush — brush, weed, grass mix good — 0.69(48) — — Woods good — 1.00(55) — — Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 9 .29 SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 9.29 Acres "WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 72* * — Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 . 00 Project : PROPOSED CONDITIONS User: GBS Date: 06-22-99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: _ Subtitle: TO DETENT. BASIN Flow Type 2 year Length. Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) Sheet 3.2 50 .02 A 0.012 Sheet 150 .024 F 0.306 Shallow Concent'd 180 .028 U 0.019 Open- Channel 750 4 .5 0.046 Time of Concentration = 0:38* Sheet Flow Surface Codes A Smooth Surface F Grassj .Dense Shallow Concentrated B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda Surface Codes C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass—Range, Short J Range, Natural * — Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 I Project : PROPOSED CONDITIONS User: GBS Date: 06-22-99 County : HARTFORD State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: TO DETENT. BASIN Data: Drainage Area 9.29 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 72 * Time of Concentration: 0.38 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24—Hr Rainfall (in) 3.2 4 .7 5.5 6.2 6 .9 Ia/P Ratio 0.24 0. 17 0. 14 0. 13 0. 11 Runoff (in) 0.93 1.97 2 .59 3. 16 3.74 Unit Peak Discharge 0.637 0.679 0.693 0.702 0.709 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.0% Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cis) 5 12 17 21 25 * — Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX D r . 6 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp 5.33 cfs 61 I 4 i ii Q 31 i 1 11 / out U0 5 10 -15 20 25 Time(Hrs) i i j 7 - SCS Runoff -.10 Yr - Qp = 12.44 cfs 15 , I `• i i j I i j 10 i i in , Q J III Out ► i I III �0 5 10 .15 20 25 Time Prs) i 8 - SCS Runoff - 25 Yr - Qp = 16.89 cfs I 20 151 f i i I I 4 10i gout 5 UO 5 10 .15 20 25 Time(Hrs) A- ! 9 - SCS Runoff - 50 Yr - Qp = 20.45 cfs I 25, 15 ' i 10- out I S.�Ir i I1 I U0 5 10 .15 20 25 Time(Hrs) 10 - SCS Runoff - 100 Yr - Qp = 24.92 cfs I 251 7nl i I I � I I I I I I I i I I I I I 151 i Q j i i I I 101 Ot 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time(Hrs) APPENDIX E Reservoir Report Page Reservoir No. 2 Kabelo Lower Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [A] [B] [C] Rise(in) = 24.0 6.0 18.0 Crest Len(ft) = 6.0 0.0 0.0 Span (in) = 24.0 6.0 18.0 Crest El.(ft) = 88.50 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 1 1 Weir Coeff. = 3.00 3.00 3.00 Invert El.(ft) = 83.00 83.00 85.80 Eqn. Exp. = 1.50 1.50 1.50 Length(ft) = 100.0 1.0 1.0 Multi-Stage = Yes No No Slope(%) = 1.00 1.00 1.00 N-Value = .013 .013 .013 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 Multi-Stage = - Yes Yes Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Cuiv.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 0.0 00 83.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.1 180 83.10 3.38 0.13 0.00 0.00 --- - 0.13 0.2 359 83.20 4.78 0.30 0.00 0.00 - - 0.30 0.3 539 83.30 5.86 0.37 0.00 0.00 - 0.37 0.4 719 83.40 6.76 0.42 0.00 0.00 -- 0.42 0.5 899 83.50 7.56 0.47 0.00 0.00 - - 0.47 0.6 1,078 83.60 8.29 0.56 0.00 0.00 - - 0.56 0.7 1,258 83.70 8.95 0.57 0.00 0.00 - - 0.57 0.8 1,438 83.80 9.57 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.9 1,617 83.90 10.15 0.76 0.00 0.00 - - 0,76 _ 1.0 1,797 84.00 10.70 0.82 0.00 0.00 - -- 0.82 1.2 2,432 84.20 11.72 0.92 0.00 0.00 - - 0.92 1.4 3,066 84.40 12.66 1.01 0.00 0.00 - 1.01 1.6 3,701 84.60 13.53 1.10 0.00 0.00 - - 1.10 1.8 4,335 84.80 14.35 1.18 0.00 0.00 - - 1.18 2.0 4,970 85.00 15.13 1.25 0.00 0.00 - 1.25 2.2 5,604 85.20 16.57 1.32 0.00 0.00 -- - 1.32 2.4 6,239 85.40 17.90 1.39 0.00 0.00 -- - 1.39 2.6 6,873 85.60 19.13 1,45 0.00 0.00 - - 1.45 2.8 7,508 85.80 20.29 1.51 0.00 0.00 - - 1.51 3.0 8,142 86.00 21.39 1.57 1.15 0.00 - - 2.72 3.2 9,022 86.20 22.43 1.62 3.81 0.00 - - 5.43 3.4 9,901 86.40 23.43 1.68 4.66 0.00 - - 6.34 3.6 10,781 86.60 24.39 1.70 5.38 0.00 - - 7.08 3.8 11,660 86.80 25.31 1.73 6.02 0.00 - - 7.75 4.0 12,540 87.00 26.20 1.76 6.59 0.00 - -- 8.35 Continues on next page... KaWo Lower Page 2 Stage/Storage/ Discharge 'fable Stage Storage Elevation Culv.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 4.2 13,419 87.20 27.06 1.79 7.12 0.00 - - 8.91 4.4 14,299 87.40 27.89 1.82 7.84 .0.00 - - 9.66 4.6 15,178 87.60 28.70 1.84 8.72 0.00 - - 10.56 4.8 16,058 87.80 29.48 1.85 9.51 . 0.00 - - 11.36 5.0 16,937 88.00 30.25 1.86 9.70 0.00 - - 11.56 5.2 18,087 88.20 31.00 1.90 10.93 0.00 - - 12.83 5.4 19,236 88.40 31.73 1.88 11.57 0.00 - 13.45 5.6 20,386 88.60 32.44 1.89 12.18 0.57 - - 14.65 5.8 21,635 88.80 33.14 1.87 12.76 2.96 - - 17.59 6.0 22,685 89.00 33.82 1.80 13.32 6.36 - - 21.49 6.2 23,834 89.20 34.49 1.69 13.85 10.54 - 26.08 6.4 24,984 89.40 35.15 1.47 13.25 15.37 - - 30.09 6.6 26,133 89.60 35.79 1.21 10.90 20.77 - - 32.87 6.8 27,283 89.80 36.43 0.98 8.82 26.68 - -- 36.43 7.0 28,432 90.00 37.05 0.00 0.00 33.07 -- - 33.07 i II Stage / Storage s 6i i I ! I Stage(ff) { 4 ' i 2 00 5000 10600 15600 20000 25" 30000 Storage(cuft) APPENDIX F Hydrograph Report Page 1 w Hyd. No. 38 j 2 YR DESIGN Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.12 cfs Storm frequency 2 rs Time interval = 2 min = Y Inflow hyd. No. = 6 Reservoir name = Kabelo Lower Max. Elevation = 85.90 ft Max. Storage . = 7,828 cuft Storage k+dicatton method used. Total Volume=27,361 cuff,0.628 ac t Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Cuter.A CUIv.B Cuter. C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cis) (cfs) (cfs) 12.23 5.11 84.38 12.56 1.00 ---- --- - - 1.00 12.27 5.29 84.54 13.25 1.07 - - - 1.07 12.30 5.33<< 84.69 13.92 1.14 - - - - 1.14 12.33 5.30 84.85 14.55 1.20 - - ---- - 1.20 12.37 5.20 85.00 15.16 1.25 - - --- - 1.25 12.40 5.05 85.15 16.20 1.30 - - - - 1.30 12.43 4.85 85.29 17.14 1.35 - - - - 1.35 12.47 4.59 85.41 17.98 1.39 - - - - 1.39 12.50 4.29 85.53 18.69 1.43 - ----- - 1.43 12.53 3.95 85.63 19.30 1.46 -- - - - 1.46 12.57 3.59 85.72 19.81 1.48 - - - - 1.48 12.60 3.23 85.79 20.23 1.51 - - - --- 1.51 12.63 2.90 85.84 20.53 1.52 0.25 - - -- 1.77 12.67 2.62 85.88 20.71 1.53 0.44 - - - 1.97 12.70 2.38 85.89 20.81 1.54 0.54 - - - 2.08 12.73 2.17 85.90 « 20.85 1.54 0.58 - - - 2.12 12.77 1.98 85.90 20.84 1.54 0.57 - - ----- 2.11 12.80 1.82 85.89 20.80 1.54 0.53 - - - 2.07 12.83 1.60 85.88 20.74 1.53 6.47 - - --- 2.00 12.87 1.67 85.87 20.67 1.53 0.40 - - - 1.93 12.90 1.47 85.86 20.60 1.53 0.32 - - - 1.84 12.93 1.39 85.84 20.52 1.52 0.24 - - - 1.76 12.97 1.32 85.83 20.44 1.52 0.16 - - - 1.68 13.00 1.27 85.81 20.37 1.51 0.09 - --- 1.60 13.03 1.22 85.80 20.31 1.51 0.02 - -- - 1.53 13.07 1.18 85.79 20.24 1.51 - - - - 1.51 13.10 1.15 85.78 20.16 1.50 - - - - 1.50 13.13 1.12 8516 20.08 1.56 - - - - 1.50 13.17 1.09 85.75 20.00 1.49 - - - - 1.49 13.20 1.06 85.73 19.90 1.49 --- - ----- ---- 1.49 13.23 1.03 85.72 19.81 1.48 --- ---- - - 1.48 13.27 1.01 85.70 19.71 1.48 - - - 1.48 13.30 0.99 85.68 19.60 1.47 - - - - 1.47 13.33 0.97 85.66 19.49 1.47 .- --- 1.47 13.37 0.95 85.64 19.38 1.46 - - - - 1.46- 13.40 0.94 85.62 19.27 1.46 - - ---- - 1.46 13.43 0.93 85.60 19.16 1.45 - -- - - 1.45 13.47 0.91 85.58 19.03 1.44 - - - - 1.44 Continues on next page... 2 YR DESIGN Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culv.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cis) (cfs) 13.50 0.90 85.56 18.91 1.44 - - --- - 1.44 13.53 0.89 85.54 18.78 1.43 - - - - 1.43 13.57 0.89 85.52 18.66 1.43 - -=- - - 1.43 13.60 0.88 85.50 18.53 1.42 - - = - 1.42 13.63 0.87 85.48 18.41 1.41 - - - 1.41 13.67 0.86 85.46 18.28 1.41 ---- - - --- 1.41 13.70 0.85 85.44 18.15 1.40 - - - - 1.40 13.73 0.84 85.42 18.02 1.39 - - --- - 1.39 13.77 0.83 85.40 17.89 1.39 - - - ---- 1.39 13.80 0.82 85.38 17.75 1.38 - - - - 1.38 13.83 0.81 85.36 17.61 1.37 - - - 1.37 13.87 0.80 85.34 17.47 1.37 - - --- - 1.37 13.90 0.80 85.32 17.33 1.36 - - - - 1.36 13.03 010 85.29 17.10 1.35 13.97 0.78 85.27 17.05 1.34 - - --- - 1.34 14.00 0.77 85.25 16.91 1.34 - - - - 1.34 14.03 0.76 85.23 16.76 1.33 - - - - 1.33 14.07 0.75 85.21 16.62 1.32 - - - -- 1.32 14.10 0.74 85.19 16.46 1.32 - - - - 1.32 14.13 0.73 85.16 16.31 1.31 _- ----- 1.31 14.17 0.72 85.14 16.15 1.30 - - - - 1.30 14.20 0.71 85.12 15.99 1.29 - - - - 1.29 14.23 0.70 85.10 15.83 1.28 - - - - 1.28 14.27 0.70 85.08 15.67 1.28 - - - - 1.28 14.30 0.69 85.05 15.52 1.27 - ---- - - 1.27 14.33 0.68 85.03 15.36 1.26 - - -- - 1.26 14.37 0.68 85.0.1 15.20 1.25 - - - ----- 1.25 14.40 0.67 84.99 15.08 1.25 - - - - 1.25 14.43 0.67 84.97 15.00 1.24 -- ----- 124 ----- ----- 14.47 0.66 84.95 14.91 1.23 ----- - ----- - 1.23 14.50 0.66 84.92 14.83 1.22 - - ---- - 1.22 14.53 0.65 84.90 14.75 1.21 - -- --- - 1.21 14.57 0.65 84.88 14.67 1.21 - - --- - 1.21 14.60 0.64 84.86 14.58 1.20 - - ----- 1.20 14.63 0.64 84.84 14.50 1.19 - - - ---- 1.19 14.67 0.63 84.82 14.42 .1.18 - - - - 1.18 14.70 0.63 84.80 14.34 1.18 - - - - 1.18 14.73 0.62 84.78 1.4.26 1.17 --- - - - 1.17. 14.77 0.62 84.76 14.17 1.16 ----- ---- ---- 1.16 14.80 0.62 84.74 14.09 1.15 ---- - - - 1.15 14.83 0.61 84.72 14.01 1.14 - - --- 1.14 14.87 0.61 84.70 13.92 1.14 - - - - 1.14 14.90 0.60 84.68 13.84 1.13 --- - - - 1.13 14.93 0.60 84.66 13.76 1.12 ----- --- - - 1.12 14.97 0.59 84.64 13.68 1.11 - - - - 1.11 15.00 0.59 84.62 13.60 1.10 -- - - - 1.10 15.03 0.58 84.60 13.52 1.10 - - - - 1.10 15.07 0.58 84.58 13.43 1.09 -- - - - 1.09 15.10 0.57 84.56 13.35 1.08 - - - 1.08 15.13 0.57 84.54 13.26 1.07 - --- - - 1.07 Continues on next page... 2 YR DESIGN Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 15.17 0.56 84.52 13.18 1.06 - --- -- - 1.06 15.20 0.56 84.50 13.10 1.06 - - - - 1.06 15.23 0.55 84.48 13.02 1.05 - - - - 1.05 15.27 0.55 84.46 12.93 1.04 ----- - - --- 1.04 15.30 0.54 84.44 12.85 1.63 - - - - 1.03 15.33 0.54 84.43 12.77 1.02 - - - 1.02 15.37 0.53 84.41 12.69 1.02 ---- - - - 1.02 15.40 0.53 84.39 12.61 1.01 ----- - --- ----- 1.01 15.43 0.52 84.37 12.52 1.00 - - - - 1.00 ...End Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hyd. No. 39 10 YR DESIGN Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 8.56 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min Inflow hyd. No. = 7 Reservoir name = Kabelo Lower Max. Elevation = 87.08 ft Max. Storage = 12,869 cult Storage kx ication me9roe used. Total Volume=59,920 cult,1.376 actt Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CuIv.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (tt) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.00 4.93 84.41 12.71 1.02 - - - - 1.02 12.03 5.96 84.58 13.44 1.09 - - - - 1.09 12.07 7.13 84.78 14.28 1.17 - - - 1.17 12.10 8.36 85.03 15.35 1.26 ---- - - - 1.26 12.13 9.57 .85.32 17.37 1.36 - - --- - 1.36 12.17 10.70 85.65 19.42 1.46 -- -- - - 1.46 12.20 11.64 85.99 21.36 1.57 1.12 - - - 2.68 12.23 12.23 86.21 22.48 1.63 3.85 - - - 5.48 12.27 12.44<< 86.39 23..3.E 1.57 4.6Q - - 6.27 12.30 12.37 86.55 24.13 1.70 5.19 - - - 6.88 12.33 12.12 86.69 24.78 1.72 5.65 - -- - 7.37 12.37 11.76 86.80 25.33 1.73 6.03 - --- - 7.76 12.40 11.28 86.90 25.77 1.75 6.31 - - - 8.06 12.43 10.71 86.98 26.11 1.76 6.53 - - - 8.29 12.47 10.03 87.03 26.35 1.77 6.68 - - 8.45 12.50 9.28 87.07 26.48 1.77 6.77 - - - 8.54 12.53 8.45 87.08 26.52 1.77 6.79 - - --- 8.56<< 12.57 7.60 87.06 26.46 1.77 6.75 - - - 8.52 12.60 6.77 87.03 26.31 1.77 6.66 - - --- 8.42 12.63 6.03 86.97 26.08 1.76 6.51 - - - 8.27 12.67 5.41 86.91 25.78 1.75 6.32 - - - 8.07 12.70 4.89 86.83 25.44 1.74 6.10 - - - 7.84 12.73 4.45 86.75 25.06 1.7-2 5.85 - - -- 7.57 12.77 4.06 86.66 24.66 1.71 5.57 --- - - 7.28 12.80 3.72 86.57 24.25 1.70 5.28 - - -= 6.98 12.83 3.43 86.48 23.83 1.69 4.96 -- -- - 6.65 12.87 3.18 86.40 23.41 1.67 4.64 - - - 6.32 12.90 2.98 86.31 2300 1.65 4.29 -- - - 5.94 12.93 2.81 86.23 22..61 1.63 3.95 - - --- 5.59 12.97 2.66 86.17 22.25 1.61 3.35 --- - - 4.96 13.00 2.55 86.11 21.97 1.60 2.63 - - - 4.23 13.03 2.45 86.07 21.76 1.59 2.10 - - 3.69 13.07 2.37 86.04 21.61 1.58 1.71 - - - 3.29 13.10 2.29 86.02 21.49 1.57 1.42 _- - _- 2.99 13.13 2.23 86.00 21.41 1.57 1.19 - - - 2.76 13.17 2.16 85.99 21.31 1.56 1.07 --- - - 2.63 13.20 2.11 86.97 21.22 1.66 0.97 - - - 2.63 13.23 2.05 85.95 21.13 1.55 0.88 - - - 2.44 Continues on next page... 10 YR DESIGN Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hM) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) . 13.27 2.00 85.94 21.06 1.55 0.80 - - - 2.35 13.30 1.96 85.93 20.99 1.55 0.73 - - - 2.28 13.33 1.92 85.92 20.93 1.54 0.66 =-- --- - 2.21 13.37 1.89 85.91 20.87 1.54 0,61 ---- -= - 2.15 13.40 1.86 85.90 20.82 1.54 0.55 - - - 2.09 13.43 1.83 85.89 20.77 1.53 0.50 - - - 2.04 13.47 1.81 85.88 20.73 1.53 0.46 - - 1.99 13.50 1.78 85.87 20.70 1.53 0.42 --- - 1.95 13.53 1.76 85.87 20.66 1.53 0.39 - - - 1.92 13.57 1.74 85.86 20.63 1.53 0.36 - - - 1.88 13.60 1.73 85.86 20.60 1.53 - 0.33 - - 1.85 13.63 1.71 85.85 20.58 1.52 0.30 - - -- 1.82 13.67 1.69 85.85 20.55 1.52 0.28 - - - 1.80 13.70 9.67 85.84 20.53 1.52 0.25 - - - 1_77 13.73 1.65 85.84 20.51 1.52 0.23 - - 1.75 13.77 1.63 85.84 20.49 1.52 0.21 - - - 1.73 13.80 1.61 85.83 20.47 1.52 0.19 - - - 1.71 13.83 1.59 85.83 20.45 1.52 0.17 - - - 9.69 13.87 1.57 85.83 20.43 1.52 0.15 - - - 1.66 13.90 1.55 85.82 20.41 1.52 0.13 _----- 1.64 13.93 1.53 85.82 20.40 1.51 0.11 - - - 1.62 13.97 1.52 85.82 20.38 1.51 0.09 - -- - 1.60 14.00 1.50 85.81 20.36 1.51 0.07 - -- 1.58 14.03 1.48 85.81 20.34 1.51 0.05 - - -- 1.56 14.07 1.46 85.81 20.32 1.51 0.03 - - --- 1.54 14.10 1.44 85.80 20.30 1.51 0.01 - - - 1.52 14.13 1.42 85.80 20.29 1.51 - - - -- 1.51 14.17 1.40 85.80 20.26 1.51 - - - - 1.51 14.20 1.38 85.79 20.24 1.61 _----- 1.51 14.23 1.37 85.79 20.21 1.51 - --- - --- 1.51 14.27 1.35 85.78 20.18 1.50 ---- - -- - 1.50 14.30 1.34 85.77 20.14 1.50 - - - - 1.50 14.33 1.33 85.77 20.11 1.50 - - - - 1.50 14.37 1.31 85.76 20.07 1.50 - - -- - 1.50 14.40 1.30 85.75 20.03 1.50 - ' - - - 1.50 _. 14.43 1.29 85.75 19.98 1.49 - - - - 1.49 14.47 1.28 85.74 19.94 1.49 - - - - 1.49 14.50 1.27 85.73 19.89 1.49 - - --- --- 1.49 14.53 1.26 85.72 19.84 1.49 - - - - 1.49 14.57 1.25 85.71 19.79 1.48 - - - 1.48 14.60 1.24 85.70 19.74 1.48 - - - - 1.48 14.63 1.23 85.70 19.68 1.48 - - - - 1.48 14.67 1.22 85.69 .19.63 1.48 - - - - 1.48 14.70 1.21 85.68 19.57 1.47 - - - - 1.47 14.73 1.20 85.67 19.52 1.47 - - - - 1.47 14.77 1.19 85.66 19.46 1.47 - - - - 1.47 14.80 1.18 85.65 19.40 1.46 - - - - 1.46 14.83 1.17 85.64 19.33 1.46 - - - - 1.46 14.87 1.16 85.62 19.27 1.46 - - - - 1.46 14.90 1.16 85.61 19.21 1.45 - - - - 1.45 Continues on next page... 10 YR DESIGN Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hm) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 14.93 1.15 85.60 19.14 1.45 - - - - 1.45 14.97 1.14 85.59 19.07 1.45 - - - - 1.45 15.00 1.13 85.58 19.00 1.44 - =--- - - 1.44 15.03 1.12 85.57 18.92 1.44 - - = - 1.44 15.07 1.11 85.55 18.85 1.43 1.43 15.10 1.10 85.54 18.77 1.43 - - - - 1.43 15.13 1.09 85.53 18.69 1.43 - - - - 1.43 15.17 1.08 85.52 18.61 1.42 - ----- - - 1.42 15.20 1.07 85.50 18.53 1.42 - - - - 1.42 15.23 1.06 85.49 18.45 1.41 - - - --- 1.41 15.27 1.05 85.48 18.36 1.41 - - - - 1.41 15.30 1.04 85.46 18.28 1.41 --- - - - 1.41 15.33 1.03 85.45 18.19 1.40 - - - - 1.40 15.37 1.02 85.43 18.10 1.40 - - - - 1.40 15.40 1.01 85.42 18.01 1.39 - - - - 1.39 15.43 1.00 85.40 17.92 1.39 - - - - 1.39 15.47 0.99 85.39 17.83 1.38 - -- - - 1.38 15.50 0.98 85.37 17.73 1.38 - - - - 1.38 15.53 0.97 85.36 17.62 1.37 - - - ---- 1.37 15.57 0.96 85.34 17.52 1.37 -- - - 1.37 15.60 0.95 85.33 17.42 1.36 - - - - 1.36 15.63 0.94 85.31 17.31 1.36 - - - - 1.36 15.67 0.93 85.30 17.21 1.35 - - - - 1.35 15.70 0.92 85.28 17.10 1.35 - ----- --- - 1.35 15.73 0.91 85.26 16.99 1.34 - - - - 1.34 15.77 0.90 85.25 16.88 1.34 - - 1.34 15.80 0.89 85.23 16.77 1.33 - - - - 1.33 15.83 0.87 85.21 16.66 1.32 - - - - 1.32 15.87 0.86 85.20 16.54 1.32 _- 1.32 15.90 0.85 85.18 16.42 1.31 - - - - 1.31 15.93 0.84 85.16 16.29 1.31 - - - - 1.31 15.97 0.83 85.14 16.17 1.30 - - - ---- 1.30 16.00 0.82 85.13 16.04 1.29 - - - - 1.29 16.03 0.81 85.11 15.91 1.29 - - - - 1.29 16.07 0.80 85.09 15.78 1.28 - --- - - 1.28 16.10 0.79 85.07 15.65 1.28 - - - 1.28 16.13 0.78 85.05 15.51 1.27 - - - - 1.27 15.17 0.77 $5.04 15.38 1.26 - - ----- - 1.26 16.20 0.76 85.02 15.25 1.26 - - - - 1.26 16.23 0.76 85.00 15.12 1.25 - - - - 1.25 16.27 0.75 84.98 15.05 1.24 - - --- - 1.24 16.30 0.74 84.96 14.97 1.24 - ---- - - 1.24 16.33 0.74 84.94 14.90 1.23 - - - - 1.23 16.37 0.73 84.92 14.83 1.22 - - ---- 1.22 16.40 0.72 $4.90 14.76 1.22 - --- - - 1.22 16.43 0.72 84.89 14.69 1.21 - - - - 1.21 16.47 0.71 04.07 14.01 1.20 - - - --- 1.20 16.50 0.71 84.85 14.54 1.20 - - - ---- 1.20 16.53 0.70 84.83 14.47 1.19 - - - - 1.19 16.57 0.70 84.81 14.40 1.18 - - - -- 1.18 Continues on next page... 10 YR DESIGN Page 4 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) WS) (cfs) (cfs) 16.60 0.69 84.79 14.33 1.17 - - - - 1.17 16.63 0.69 84.78 14.25 1.17 - - - - 1.17 16.67 0.69 84.76 14.18 1.16 - =--- - - 1.16 16.70 0.68 84.74 14.11 1.15 - - _ - 1.15 16.73 0.68 84.72 14.03 1.15 - - - - 1.15 16.77 0.67 84.70 13.96 1.14 - - - - 1.14 16.80 0.67 84.69 13.89 1.13 - - - - 1.13 16.83 0.66 84.67 13.81 1.13 - - - - 1.13 16.87 0.66 84.65 13.74 1.12 - - - - 1.12 16.90 0.65 84.63 13.67 1.11 - - - 1.11 16.93 0.65 84.62 13.60 1.11 - - - --- 1.11 16.97 0.64 84.60 13.53 1.10 ----- -- -- - 1.10 17.00 0.64 84.58 13.46 1.09 - - - --- 1.09 97.03 0.64 84.57 i1 -38 9.08 - - - - 1.08 17.07 0.63 84.55 13.31 1.08 --- - - - 1.08 17.10 0.63 84.53 13.23 1.07 ---- - - - 1.07 17.13 0.62 84.52 13.16 1.06 ---- ---- - - 1.06 17.17 0.62 84.50 13.09 1.06 - - - - 1.06 17.20 0.61 -84.48 13.02 1.05 - - - - 1.05 17.23 0.61 84.47 12.94 1.04 - ----- 1.04 17.27 0.60 84.45 12.87 1.03 - --- - ----- 1.03 17.30 0.60 84.43 12.80 1.03 - - - ---- 1.03 , 17.33 0.59 84.42 12.73 1.02 - - - - 1.02 17.37 0.59 84.40 12.66 1.01 --- - - ----- 1.01 17.40 0.59 84.39 12.59 1.01 - - - ---- 1.01 ...End i Hydrograph Report Page , Hyd. No. 40 25 YEAR DESIGN Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 11.53 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 2 rein Inflow hyd. No. = 8 Reservoir name = Kabelo Lower Max. Elevation = 87.98 ft Max. Storage = 16,835 cuft Storms KKK+mdnod used. Total Volume=80,440 cult,1.847 adit Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CuIv.A Culy.B Cuter.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.10 11.65 85.92 20.96 1.54 0.70 - - - 2.24 12.13 13.25 86.18 22.34 1.62 3.56 - - - 5.18 12.17 14.74 86.41 23.46 1.68 4.68 - - - 6.36 12.20 15.94 86.64 24.57 1.71 5.51 - - - 7.22 12.23 16.67 86.88 25.65 1.74 6.24 - - - 7.98 12.27 16.89 << 87.11 26.66 1.78 6.88 - - - 8.65 12.30 16.73 87.32 27.56 1.81 7.56 - --- - 9.37 12.33 16.34 87.51 28.32 1.83 8.31 - - - 10.14 12.37 15.79 87.06 20.93 1.84 0.95 - - - 10.79 12.40 15.11 87.78 29.40 1.85 9.43 ---- - --- 11.28 12.43 14.29 87.87 29.75 1.85 9.58 - - - 11.43 12.47 13.35 87.93 30.00 1.86 9.64 - - - 11.49 12.50 12.31 87.97 30.14 1.86 9.67 - - - 11.53 12.53 11.18 87.98 30.16 1.86 9.68 - - --- 11.53 << 12.57 10.02 87.95 30.06 1.86 9.65 - - --- 11.51 12.60 8.90 87.90 29.85 1.85 9.60 - - - 11.46 12.63 7.92 87.81 29.54 1.85 9.53 - - - 11.37 12.67 7.09 87.71 29.14 1.84 9.17 --- - - 11.01 12.70 6.46 87.60 28.71 1.84 8.73 - - - 10.57 12.73 5.81 87.49 28.25 1.83 8.23 - - -- 10.06 12.77 5.29 87.37 27.77 1.82 7.74 - - - 9.56 12.80 4.85 87.26 27.29 1.80 7.32 - - 9.12 12.83 4.47 87.14 26.80 1.78 6.96 - - - 8.74 12.87 4.14 87.02 26.29 1.77 6.65 - - - 6.42 12.90 3.87 86.91 25.78 1.75 6.32 - - - 8.07 12.93 3.65 86.79 25.28 1.73 6.00 ----- ---- --- 7.73 12.97 3.46 86.68 24.78 1.72 5.65 --- - - 7.37 13.00 3.31 86.58 24.30 9.70 5.31 - - - 7.01 13.03 3.18 86.48 23.83 1.69 4.96 - - - 6.65 13.07 3.07 86.39 23.39 1.67 4.63 - - 6.30 13.10 2.98 86.31 22.97 1.65 4.27 - ---- 5.92 13.13 2.89 86.23 22.59 1.63 3.94 ---- - 5.57 13.17 2.80 86.17 22.25 1.61 3.34 - -- - 4.95 13.20 2.73 86.11 21.99 1.60 2.67 -- 4.27 13.23 2.66 86.08 21.80 1.59 2.19 - - - 3.78 13.27 2.59 86.05 21.66 1.58 1.84 - - ---- 3.42 13.30 2.54 86.03 21.66 1.68 1.68 3.15 13.33 2A9 86.02 21.48 1.57 1.38 - ---- 2.95 Continues on next page... 25 YEAR DESIGN Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy. B CuIv.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hm) (cfs) (ft) (cis) (cfs) (cfs) (cis) (cfs) (cis) (cis) 13.37 2.44 86.01 21.42 1.57 1.23 - - - 2.80 13.40 2.40 86.00 21.37 1.57 1.13 - - - 2.70 13.43 2.37 85.99 21.31 1.56 1.07 =--- - - 2.63 13.47 2.33 85.98 21.26 1.56 1.01 - _ - 2.57 13.50 2.31 85.97 21.21 1.56 0.66 - -- - 2.52 13.53 2.28 85.96 21.17 1.56 0.92 - -- - 2.47 13.57 2.25 85.95 21.13 1.55 0.88 - - - 2.43 13.60 2.23 85.95 21.09 1.55 0.84 - ---- - 2.39 13.63 2.20 85.94 21.06 1.55 0.81 - - - 2.36 13.67 2.18 85.93 21.03 1.55 0.77 - - - 2.32 13.70 2.15 85.93 21.00 1.55 0.74 - 2.29 13.73 2.13 85.92 20.97 1.65 0.71 - - -- 2.26 13.77 2.10 85.92 20.95 1.54 0.69 --- - - 2.23 13.60 2.08 85.91 26.92 9.64 0.66 --- - - 2.20 13.83 2.05 85.91 20.89 1.54 0.63 - - - 2.17 13.87 2.03 85.91 20.87 1.54 0.61 - - - 2.15 13.90 2.00 85.90 20.85 1.54 0.58 - -- - 2.12 13.93 1.98 85.90 20.82 1.54 0.55 - - - 2.09 13.97 1.95 85.89 20.80 1.54 0.53 - - 2.07 14.00 1.92 85.89 20.77 1.53 0.50 --- 2.04 14.03 1.90 85.88 20.75 1.53 0.48 - - - 2.01 ...End Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hyd. No. 41 - 50 YR DESIGN Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 14.31 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 2 min lnflow*hyd. No. = 9 Reservoir name = Kabelo Lower Max. Elevation = 88.54 ft Max. Storage = 20,062 cuft Storage Indication method used. Total Volume=96,963 cuff,2.226 acft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A CuIv. B -Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (ofs) (oft) (oft) (oft) (cfs) WS) (oft) 8.90 0.04 83.01 0.31 0.01 - - - - 0.01 8.93 0.05 83.01 0.38 0.01 - - - - 0.01 8.97 0.05 83.01 0.46 0.02 - - - - 0.02 9.00 0.06 83.02 0.55 0.02 - - - - 0.02 9.03 0.07 83.02 0.64 0.02 - - - - 0.02 9.07 0.08 83.02 0.75 0.03 - - - - 0.03 9.10 0.08 83.03 0.86 0.03 - - - - 0.03 9.13 0.09 83.03 0.98 0.04 - - - - 0.04 9.17 0.10 83.03 1.10 0.04 - - - - 0.04 9.20 0.11 83.04 1.23 0.05 - - - - 0.05 9.23 0.11 83.04 1.37 0.05 - - - - 0.05 9.27 0.12 83.04 1.52 0.06 - - - - 0.06 9.30 0.13 83.05 1.67 0.06 - - - - 0.06 9.33 0.14 83.05 1.83 0.07 - - - - 0.07 9.37 0.15 83.06 1.99 0.07 - - - -=- 0.07 9.40 0.16 83.06 2.17 0.08 - - - - 0.08 9.43 0.17 83.07 2.34 0.09 - - - - 0.09 9.47 0.18 83.07 2.53 0.09 - - - - 0.09 9.50 0.19 83.08 2.71 0.10 - - - - 0.10 9.53 0.20 83.09 2.91 0.11 - - - - 0.11 9.57 0.21 83.09 3.11 0.12 - - - - 0.12 9.60 0.22 83.10 3.32 0.12 - - ----- 0.12 9.63 0.23 83.10 3.44 0.13 - - - - 0.13 9.67 0.24 83.11 3.53 0.14 - - - - 0.14 9.70 0.25 83.12 3.61 0.15 - - - - 0.15 9.73 0.26 83.12 3.70 0.16 - - - - 0.16 9.77 0.27 83.13 3.79 0.18 - - - - 0.18 9.80 0.28 83.14 3.87 0.19 - - - - 0.19 9.83 0.29 83.14 3.96 0.20 - - - - 0.20 9.87 0.30 83.15 4.05 0.21 - - - - 0.21 9.90 0.31 83.15 4.14 0.22 - - - - 0.22 9.93 0.33 83.16 4.23 0.23 - - - - 0.23 9.97 0.34 83.17 4.32 0.24 - - --- - 0..24 10.00 0.35 83.17 4.41 0.25 - - - - 0.25 10.03 0.36 83.18 4.50 0.26 - - - - 0.26 10.07 0.38 83.19 4.59 0.28 - - - - 0.28 10.10 0.39 83.19 4.69 0.29 - - - - 0.29 10.13 0.40 83.20 4.78 0.30 - - ----- - 0.30 Continues on next page... 50 YR DESIGN Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culy.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cis) (cis) (cfs) (cis) (cis) 10.17 0.42 83.21 4.86 0.30 - - - - 0.30 10.20 0.43 83.21 4.94 0.31 - - - - 0.31. 10.23 0.44 83.22 5.03 0.31 - - - - 0.31 10.27 0.46 83.23 5.13 0.32 --- - --= - 0.32 . 10.30 0.48 83.24 5.23 0.33 - - - - 0.33 10.33 0.49 83.25 5.35 0.33 - - - - 0.33 10.37 0.51 83.26 5.46 0.34 - - - 0.34 10.40 0.53 83.28 5.59 0.35 - - - - 0.35 10.43 0.55 83.29 5.72 0.36 - - - - 0.36 10.47 0.57 83.30 5.86 0.37 - - - ----- 0.37 10.50 0.59 83.31 5.99 0.37 - - - 0.37 10.53 0.61 83.33 6.12 0.38 - - - - 0.38 10.57 0.63 83.34 6.26 0.39 - - - - 0.39 10.60 0.65 83.36 6.41 0.40 - - - - 0.40 10.63 0.67 83.38 6.57 0.41 - - - - 0.41 10.67 0.70 83.40 6.73 0.42 - - - - 0.42 10.70 0.72 83.41 6.88 0.43 - - -- - 0.43 10.73 0.74 83.43 7.04 0.44 - - - - 0.44 10.77 0.77 83.46 7.20 0.45 - - - - 0.45 10.80 0.79 83.48 7.38 0.46 - - - - 0.46 10.83 0.81 83.50 7.56 0.47 - - - - 0.47 10.87 0.84 83.52 7.72 0.49 - - - - 0.49 10.90 0.86 83.55 7.89 0.51 - - - - 0.51 10.93 0.89 83.57 8.06 0.53 - - - - 0.53 10.97 0.92 83.59 8.24 0.55 - - - - 0.55 11.00 0.94 83.62 8.40 0.56 - - - - 0.56 11.03 0.97 83.64 8.58 0.57. - - - - 0.57 11.07 1.00 83.67 8.76 0.57 - - - - 0.57 11.10 1.03 83.70 8.96 0.58 - - - -- 0.58 11.13 1.06 83.73 9.14 0.61 - - - ----- 0.61 11.17 1.10 83.76 9.33 0.65 - - - -- 0.65 11.20 1.14 83.79 9.51 0.69 - - - - 0.69 11.23 1.18 83.82 9.70 0.71 - - - - 0.71 11.27 1.23 83.85 9.88 0.73 - - - - 0.73 11.30 1.29 83.89 10.08 0.76 - • - - -- 0.76 11.33 1.34 83.93 10.29 0.78 - - - - 0.78 11.37 1.41 83.97 10.50 0.80 - - - - 0.80 11.40 1.47 84:00 10.72 0.82 - - - - 0.82 11.43 1.55 84.03 10.85 0.83 - - - - 0.83 11.47 1.62 84.06 10.99 0.85 - - - --- 0.85 11.50 1.70 84.09 11.15 0.86 - - - - 0.86 11.53 1.78 84.12 11.31 0.88 - - - - 0.88 11.57 1.88 84.16 11.50 0.90 - - - - 0.90 11.60 2.01 84.20 11.70 0.92 - - ---- - 0.92 11.63 2.17 84.24 11.90 0.94 - - - - 0.94 11.67 2.37 84.29 12.14 0.96 - - - - 0•96 11.70 2.63 84.35 12.41 0.99 - - ---- - 0.99 11.73 2.95 84.42 12.72 1.02 - - - - 1.02 11.77 3.35 84.50 13.07 1.05 - - - - 1.05 11.80 3.82 84.59 13.49 1.09 - - - - 1.09 Continues on next page... 50 YR DESIGN Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Culv.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 11.83 4.36 84.70 13.95 1.14 - - - - 1.14 11.87 4.97 84.83 14.49 1.19 - - - - 1.19 11.90 5.65 84.99 15.09 1.25 - - - - 1.25 11.93 6.45 85.17 16.36 1.31 - - 1.31 11.97 7.47 85.38 17.78 1.38 - 1.38 - - - 12.00 8.83 85.64 19.35 1.46 - 1.46 12.03 10.51 85.93 21.02 1.55 0.76 - - 2.31 12.07 12.40 86.16 22.25 1.61 3.33 - - ----- 4.95 12.10 14.34 86.38 23.32 1.67 4.56 - - - 6.23 12.13 16.25 86.61 24.44 1.71 5.42 - - - 7.12 12.17 18.00 86.87 25.63 1.74 6.23 - -. - 7.97 12.20 19.41 87.16 26.86 1.78 7.00 - - - 8.79 12.23 20.24 87.44 28.06 1.82 8.03 - - - 9.85 12.27 20.46<< 87.71 29.14 1.84 9.17 - - - 11.01 12.30 20.22 87.96 30.10 1.86 9.66 - - - 11.52 12.33 19.69 88.14 30.76 1.89 10.54 - - - 12.42 12.37 18.99 88.27 31.27 1.89 11.17 - - - 13.06 12.40 18.13 88.39 31.67 1.88 11.52 - - - 13.41 12.43 17.11 88.47 31.97 1.89 11.78 0.20 - - 13.86 12.47 15.96 88.52 32.16 1.89 11.94 0.35 - - 14.18 12.50 14.68 88.54<< 32.24 1.89 12.01 0.41 - - 14.31 << 12.53 13.31 88.54 32.22 1.89 11.99 0.39 - -- 14.27 12.57 11.91 88.50 32.10 1.89 11.89 0.30 - - 14.08 12.60 10.56 88.45 31.90 1.88 11.72 0.14 - - 13.75 12.63 9.38 88.37 31.63 1.88 11.49 - - - 13.37 12.67 8.39 88.28 31.30 1.89 11.20 - - - 13.09 12.70 7.57 88.18 30.92 1.89 10.81 - - - 12.70 12.73 6.86 88.07 30.52 1.87 10.15 - - - 12.02 12.77 6.25 87.95 30.07 1.86 9.65 - - - 11.51 12.80 5.72 87.80 29.50 1.85 9.52 -- - - 11.37 12.83 5.26 87.65 28.90 1.84 8.93 - - --- 10.77 12.87 4.88 87.51 28.32 1.83 8.31 - - - 10.14 12.90 4.56 87.37 27.75 1.81 7.72 - - - 9.54 12.93 4.29 87.23 27.20 1.80 7.24 - - - 9.04 12.97 4.07 87.11 26.65 1.78 6.87 - - --- - 8.65 13.00 3.89 86.98 26.12 1.76 6.54 - - - 8.30 13.03 3.74 86.87 25.60 1.74 6.21 - - - 7.95 13.07 3.61 86.75 25.10 1.73 5.87 - - - 7.60 13.10 3.50 86.65 24.61 1.71 5.54 - - - 7.25 13.13 3.39 86.55 24.15 1.70 5.20 - - - 6.90 13.17 3.29 86.46 23.71 1.68 4.87 - - 6.56 13.20 3.20 86.37 23.29 1.67 4.54 - - - 6.21 13.23 3.12 86.29 22.90 1.65 4.21 - - - 5.85 13.27 3.04 86.22 22.55 1.63 3.90 - - - 5.53 13.30 2.98 86.16 22.24 1.61 3.30 - - - 4.91 13.33 2.92 86.12 22.00 1.60 2.70 - - - 4.30 13.37 2.87 86.08 21.83 1.59 2.27 - - - 3.86 13.40 2.82 86.06 21.71 1.58 1.96 - - 3.54 13.43 2.78 86.04 21.62 1.58 1.73 - - - 3.31 13.47 2.74 86.03 21.55 1.58 1.56 - - - 3.14 Continues on next page... Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hyd. No. 42 100 YR DESIGN Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 20.51 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Kabelo Lower Max. Elevation = 88.95 ft Max. Storage = 22,396 cult Storage Indication method used. Total Volume=117,892 cult,2.706 acft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time inflow Elevation Cuiv.A Culy. B Culy.C Weir A Weir.B Weir C. Outflow (hrs) (Cft) (ft) WS) (Cft) WS) WS) WS) WS) WS) 11.50 2.22 84.40 12.66 1.01 - - - - 1.01 11.53 2.32 84.45 12.87 1.03 - - - ----- 1.03 11.57 2.45 84.50 13.09 1.06 - - - - 1.06 11.60 2.61 84.55 13.33 1.08 - - - - 1.08 11.63 2.81 84.62 13.59 1.10 - - - - 1.10 11.67 3.06 84.68 13.87 1.13 - - - - 1.13 11.70 3.38 84.76 14.20 1.16 - - - - 1.16 11.73 3.79 84.85 14.56 1.20 - --- ----- - 1.20 11.77 4.28 84.96 14.97 1.24 - - - - 1.24 11.80 4.87 85.09 15.74 1.28 ---- --- -- - 1.28 11.83 5.54 85.23 16.79 1.33 - - - - 1.33 11.87 6.30 85.41 17.93 1.39 - - - - 1.39 11.90 7.14 85.61 19.17 1.45 - - - -- 1.45 - 11.93 8.13 85.83 20.48 1.52 0.20 - - - 1.72 11.97 9.38 86.05 21.66 1.58 1.81 - - - 3.40 12.00 11.02 86.21 22.47 1.63 3.84 - ---- -- 5.46 12.03 13.07 86.38 23.31 1.67 4.56 - - - 6.23 12.07 15.35 86.58 24.31 1.70 5.32 - - 7.02 12.10 17.70 86.83 25.45 1.74 6.11 - ---- --- 7.84 12.13 19.99 87.12 26.71 1.78 6.91 - - ---- 8.69 12.17 22.09 87.44 28.06 1.82 8.02 - - ---- 9.85 12.20 23.75 87.78 29.40 1.85 9.43 --- ----- - 11.27 12.23 24.71 88.09 30.59 1.88 10.26 ----- - ---- 12.14 12.27 24.92 << 88.34 31.62 1.89 11.39 - - - 13.28 12.30 24.58 88.57 $2.34 1.89 12.10 0.49 - - 14.48 12.33 23.90 88.75 32.96 1.88 12.62 2.37 - - 16.87 12.37 23.01 88.87 33.37 1.85 12.95 4.10 - - 18.90 12.40 21.93 88.93 33.58 1.83 13.12 5.16 - - 20.11 12.43 20.67 88.95 33.65 1.82 13.18 5.51 - - 20.51 << 12.47 19.24 88.94 33.62 1.83 13.15 5.34 - ---- 20.32 12.50 17.68 88.91 33.51 1.84 13.06 4.79 ---- - 19.69 12.53 16.00 88.86 33.34 1.85 12.92 3.95 - - 18.73 12.57 14.29 88.80 33.12 1.87 12.75 2.91 - - 17.53 12.60 12.66 88.72 32.87 1.88 12.54 2.03 _----- --- 16.45 12.63 11.22 88.64 32.58 1.89 12.30 1.06 - ----- 15.25 12.67 10.04 88.55 32.27 1.89 12.04 0.44 ----- - 14.37 12.70 9.04 88.46 31.94 1.89 11.75 0.17 - - 13.80 12.73 8.20 88.36 31.56 1.89 11.43 - - - 13.31 Continues on next page. i 100 YR DESIGNPage 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CuIv.A Culv.B Culy. C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (h's) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) _ 12.77 7.46 88.24 31.16 1.89 11.07 -- ---- - 12.97 12.80 6.82 88.13 30.73 1.88 10.49 -- - 12.38 12.83 6.28 88.02 30.31 1.86 9.79 =-- ----- -- 11.65 12.87 5,82 87.87 29.75 1.85 9.58 - --= - 11.43 12.90 5.43 87.72 29.16 1.84 9.18 - --- - 11.03 12.93 5.11 87.57 28.57 1.84 8.58 - - 10.41 12.97 4.85 87.43 28.00 1.82 7.97 - - 9.79 13.00 4.63 87.30 27.46 1.81 7.47 - - -- 9.28 13.03 4.45 87.17 26.95 1.79 7.05 - - - 8.84 13.07 4.29 87.06 26.44 1.77 6.74 - ---- ---- 8.51 13.104.16 86.94 25.95 1.75 6.43 - - 8.18 13.13 4.03 86.84 25.47 1.74 6.12 - ----- -- 7.86 13.17 3.92 86.74 25.01 1.72 5.81 - - - 7.54 13.20 3.81 86.64 24.57 1.71 5.51 - - - 7.22 13.23 3.71 86.55 24.15 1.70 5.20 - - - 6.90 13.27 3.62 86.47 23.75 1.68 4.90 - - - 6.58 13.30 3.54 86.39 23.37 1.67 4.61 - - --- 6.28 13.33 3.47 86.32 23.01 1.65 4.30 - -- - 5.96 13.37 3.40 86.25 22.69 1.64 4.03 -- - -- 5.66 13.40 3.35' 86.19 22.40 1.62 3.72 ___ 5.34 13.43 3.30 86.15 22.16 1.61 3.10 -- - - 4.71 18.47 3.25 86.11 21.98 1.60 2.66 - - - 4.26 13.50 3.21 86.09 21.86 1.59 2.35 ---- ----- - 3.94 13.53 3.17 86.07 21.77 1.59 2.12 - - - 3.70 13.57 3.13 86.06 21.70 1.58 1.95 - - - 3.53 13.60 3.10 86.05 21.65 1.58 1.82 - - 3.40 13.63 3.06 86.04 21.61 1.58 1.72 - ---- - 3.30 13.67 3.03 86.04 21.58 1.58 1.64 - - - 3.22 13.70 2.99 86.Q3 21.5E 1.58 1.58 _- ----- ----- 3.15 13.73 2.95 86.03 21.54 1.58 1.52 -- ---- ---- 3.10 13.77 2.92 86.02 21.52 1.57 1.47 -- - - 3.05 13.80 2.88 86.02 21.50 1.57 1.43 - - - 3.00 13.83 2.85 86.02 21.48 1.57 1.39 - - - 2.96 13.87 2.81 86.01 21.47 1.57 1.35 - - 2.92 13.90 2.78 86.01 21.45 1.57 1.31 - - - 2.88 13.93 2.74 86.01 21.44 1.57 1.27 - - 2.84 13.97 2.70 86.01 21.42 1.57 1.23 - - 2.80 14.00 2.67 86.00 21.41 1.57 1.20 ----- - - 2.77 14.03 2.63 86.00 21.39 1.57 1.16 - - - 2.73 . 14.07 2.59 86.00 21.37 1.57 1.14 - - 2.70 14.10 2.56 85.99 21.35 1.57 1.11 - ----- - 2.68 14.13 2.53 85.99 21.33 1.56 1.08 - -- - 2.65 14.17 2.49 85.98 21.30 1.56 1.06 - ---- - 2.62 14.20 2.46 85.98 21.27 1.56 1.03 ---- - 2.59 14.23 2.43 85.97 21.25 1.56 1.00 - -- - 2.56 14.27 2.40 85.97 21.22 1.56 0.97 - - - 2.53 14.30 2.38 85.96 21.19 1.56 0.95 - - - 2.50 14.33 2.36 65.96 21.17 1.56 6.92 - - -- 2.47 14.37 2.33 85.96 21.14 1.55 0.89 - - - 2.45 14.40 2.31 85.95 21.12 1.55 0.87 - - - 2.42 Continues on next page... 100 YR DESIGN Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time inflow Elevation Culy.A Culv. B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Outflow (hrs) (aft) (ft) (cft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cft) -. 14.43 2.29 85.95 21.10 1.55 0.84 - ---- - 2.40 14.47 2.27 85.94 21.08 1.55 0.82 - - --- 2.37 14.50 _ 2.25 85.94 21.05 1.55 0.80 -- -- --- 2.35 14.53 2.23 85.94 21.03 1.55 0.78 - - - 2.33 14.57 2.22 85.93 21.62 1.65 016 . - - - 2.31 14.60 2.20 85.93 21.00 1.55 0.74 - - - 2.29 14.63 2.18 85.93 20.98 1.55 0.72 - -- 2.27 14.67 2.16 85.92 20.96 1.54 0.70 - - - 2.25 14.70 2.15 85.92 20.94 1.54 0.68 - -- - 2.23 14.73 2.13 85.92 20.93 1.54 0.67 - - 2.21 14.77 2.11 85.91 20.91 1.54 0.65 - - - 2.19 14.80 2.09 85.91 20.89 1.54 0.63 -- - - 2.17 14.83 2.08 85.91 20.88 1.54 0.61 - - - 2.15 14.87 2.06 85.90 20.86 1.54 0.60 - - - 2.14 14.90 2.04 85.90 20.84 1.54 0.58 - - - 2.12 14.93 2.02 85.90 20.83 1.54 0.56 - - - 2.10 14.97 2.00 85.89 20.81 1.54 0.55 - - - 2.08 15.00 1.99 85.89 20.80 1.54 0.53 - - - 2.06 15.03 1.97 85.89 20.78 1.54 0.51 - --- - 2.05 15.07 1.95 85.89 20.76 1.53 0.49 ----- _----- - 2.03 16.10 1.93 85.88 20.75 1.53 0.48 - - - 2.01 15.13 1.92 85.88 20.73 1.53 0.46 - ---- - 1.99 15.17 1.90 85.88 20.72 1.53 0.44 ----- - - 1.98 15.20 1.88 85.87 20.70 1.53 0.43 - - -- 1.96 15.23 1.86 85.87 20.68 1.53 0.41 - - ----- 1.94 15.27 1.84 85.87 20.67 1.53 0.39 - - - 1.92 15.30 1.83 85.87 20.65 1.53 0.38 -- - - 1.90 15.33 1.81 85.86 20.63 1.53 0.36 ----- - - 1.89 15.37 1.79 85.86 20.62 1.53 0.34 _-_ - ----- 1. 7 15.40 1.77 85.86 20.60 1.53 0.32 - - ----- 1.85 15.43 1.75 85.85 20.59 1.53 0.31 - -- ---- 1.83 15.47 1.74 85.85 20.57 1.52 0.29 -- - ---- 1.81 15.50 1.72 85.85 20.55 1.52 0.27 - - 1.80 15.53 1.70 85.84 20.54 1.52 0.26 - 1.78 15.57 1.68 85.84 20.52 1.52 0.24 ---- - 1.76 15.60 1.66 85.84 20.50 1.52 0.22 - -- - 1.74 15.63 1.64 85.84 20.49 1.52 0.20 - - 1.72 15.67 1.63 85.83 20.47 1.52 0.19 - ---- 1.71 16.70 1.61 85.83 20.45 1.52 0.17 ----- -- 1.69 15.73 1.59 85.83 20.44 1.52 0.15 - --- - 1.67 15.77 1.57 85.82 20.42 1.52 0.13 - - 1.65 15.80 1.55 85.82 20.40 1.52 0.12 ---- - - 1":63 15.83 1.53 85.82 20.39 1.51 0.10 - - - 1.61 16.87 1.52 85.81 20.37 1.51 0.08 - - - 1.60 15.90 1.50 85.81 20.35 1.51 0.06 - - ----- 1.58 15.93 1.48 85.81 20.34 1.51 0.05 - - - 1.56 15.97 1.46 85.81 20.32 1.51 0.03 --- - - 1.54 16.00 1.44 86.66 26.30 1.51 0.01 - - - 1.52 16.03 1.42 85.80 20.29 1.51 - - - - 1.51 16.07 1.41 85.80 20.27 1.51 - - - - 1.51 Continues on next page... APPENDIX G TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : Rabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County : Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope. Surface n Area. Wp Velocity Time rain . (ft) (ft/ft) code - (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 50 .07 F -0.'063 Time of Concentration = 0.08* Shallow Concent'd 50 .008 U 0.010 Open Channel ISO 0.57 0.073 Travel Time = Q.08* j --- Sheet Flaw Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow Mo Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surfarze Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved F. Grass.-Range., Short 1 Range, Natural * - Generated- for- use by GRAPHIC method RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project Kabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER D9SCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) 7-------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg .Estab.) Open spice {Lawxis,parks etc.) Good condition; grass cover > 75%- - .168 (6.1) - Impervipus Areas Paved parking lots, roofs driveways - .078(98) - - P g � Y Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) .246 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .246 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 73* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE- METHOD Version 2.00 Project : Kabelo User 002 Date: 06-29-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg lb-2a Data.- .Drainage Area :256 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 76 Time of Concentration: 0.05 * Hours, Rainfall. Type Pond and, Swamp Area NONE Storm Number i 2 3 4 5 Frequency (yrs) 2 10 .25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3. 2 4.7 5.5 6.2 6.9 Ia/P Ratio 0.20 0.13 0.11 0.JG 0.09 Used 0 .20 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.10 Runoff (in) 1.15 2.29 2.95 3 .55 4.17 Unit Peak Discharge 1.028 1.057 1.065 1..071 1.072 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1-00 1.00 1.00 1_.00 1.00 0.0% Ponds Used -i ---- Peak Discharge (cf s) 0 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project Kabelo User: 002 Date: 06-29-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg lb-2a ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area NF Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3 .2 50 .07 F 0.083 Time. of. Concentration = 0.08* Shallow Concent'd 5i1 :008 U 0.010 Open Channel 150 0.57 0.-073 Travel Time 0.09* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes -.-- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B. Fallow (No Res. ) G .Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 1 Res. H. woods, Light P 'Paved D Cultivated > .20 Res. I moods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural . *. Generated.. for. us.e by GRAPHIC method RUNOFF CURVE. NtIMBER COMPUTATION. Version 2 .00 Project Rabelo User: 002 Date: 05-29-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: 13ubtitle: Bldg lb-2.a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Sail. Group COVES DESCRIPTION A B C D -Acres {CN) ----------------------------------------------------------•------------------_--- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space Mawns,parks etc.) Good condition_; grass cover > 75"s Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - _105 (98) - - -Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) .256 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA .25G Acres WEIGIiTED CURVE NUMBER-. T6* ..------r----------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL, PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 .00 Project Kabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 2b-3a Data: DM;ai.nage Area .301 * Acres Runoff Curare Number 78 * Time of "Concentration: 0.08 * -Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3.2 4.7 5.5 6.2 6.9 Ia/P Ratio 0.18 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 Used 0 .18 0.12 0.10 0 .10 0.10 Runoff {in) 1.27 2 .46 3 .14 3 .76 4 .38 Unit Peak Discharge 1.038 1.063 1.071 1.072 1.072 (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 0 1 1 1 1 * - Value (s) provided from TR-55 system routines TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME version 2 .00 Project Rabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 2b-3a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year. Length Slope Surface n Area -Wp 'Velocity Time raiw. (€t) (€t/ft} code (sq/€t) (€t) (ft/sec) Ahr} Sheet-----------------50 .07 ------- -----------------------------------------fl_0S3 3 .2 Time of Concentration = 0.08* Shallow Concent'd 50 _008 U 0_010 Open Channel 150 0.57 0.073 Travel Time = 0.08* --- $beet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Re-&. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 a Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res-. I -Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method III RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project Kabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 2b-3a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Pstab. ) Open space (Lawns.,parks etc.) Good condition; grass cover > 750 - .161(61) - - Impervigus Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .140 (98) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic -Soil Group) .301 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T©TAD DRAINAGE .AREA_- ..301 .Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 78* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2 .00 Project : Kabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County : Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 6 Data: Drainage Area _ _359 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 73 * Time of Concentration: O.D8 *Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE Storm Number 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 50 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3_2 4.7 5.5 6.2 6.9 Ia/P Ratio 0.23 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.11 Runoff (in) 0.9E 2.05 2 68 3.2-6 3.85 j Unit Peak Discharge 1.013 1.046 1.057 1.Q63 1.069 . (cfs/acre/in) Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) -------------- * - Values) provided from TR-55 system routines TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2 .00 Project : Kabelo User: 0002 Date: 06-15-99 County : Bart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain - (ft) (ft/ft) code - (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Sheet 3 .2 50 .07 F 0.083 Time of Concentration = 0.08* Shallow Concent'd 50 .008 U 0.010 Open Channel 150 0.5-7 0_.073 Travel Time- = . 0.08* . --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 g Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 t Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method RUNOFF CURVE R MBER COMPUTATION Version 2 .00 Project : -Kabela -User: 0002 Date:'-D6-15-99 County Hart State: ct Checked: Date: Subtitle: Bldg 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.) Open -space �Lavna�parks etc_) Good condition; grass cover > 75s - _245 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .114 (98) - Total Area (by Hydrologic -Soil Group) .359 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .359 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 73* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method APPENDIX H Reservoir Report Page 1 Reservoir No. 2 BLDG 1 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] IB] [G] [A] [B] IC] Rise(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Span(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eqn.Exp. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Length(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mutti,Stage - Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 N Value = .000 .000 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = - Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft NoW All oultbws have bmn anafyz under mW and outlet control. Stage/Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culy.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft).. (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Ws). (cfs) 0.0 00 99.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.1 14 99.10 - - - - - 0.00 0.2 28 9920 - - - - - - 0.00 0.3 43 99.30 - - - - - - 0.00 0.4 57 99.40 - - - - - - 0.00 0.5 .71 99.50 - - - - - = . 0.00 0.6 85 99.60 - - - - - - 0.01. 0.7 99 99.70 - - - - - - 0.01 0.8 114 99.80 - - - - - - 0.01 0.9 128 99..90 - - - - - - 0.01 1.0 142 100.00 --- - - - 0.01 1.1 156 100.10 - - . - -- - 0.01 1.2 170 100.20 - - - - - - 0.01 1.3 185 100.30 - -- - - - - 0.02 1.4 199 100.40 . - - - - - - 0.02 1.5 213 100.50 - - - - - - 0.02 1.6 227 100.60 - - - -- - - 0.02 1.7 241 .100.70 - - - - - - 0.02 1.8 256 100.80 - - - - - - 0.03 1.9 270 100.90 - - - - - - 0.03 2.0 284 101.00 - - - - - - -0.03 2.1 298 101.10 - - - - - - . 0.03 2.2 312 10120 - - - - - - 0.03 2.3 327 101.30 - - - - - - 0.03 2.4 341 101.40 - - - - - - 0.03 2.5 355 101.50 - - - - - - 0.03 Confines on next page... BLDG 1 Page 2 Stage J Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Cult'.A Culy.B Cuhr.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (Cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (Cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2.6 369 101.60 - - - - - - 0.04 2.7 383 101.70 - - - - - - 0.04 2.8 - 398 101.80 - - - - - - 0:04 2.9 412 101.90 - - - - - - 0.04 3.0 426 102.00 - - - - - - 0.04 3.1 440 162.10 - - - - - - 0.04 3.2 454 102.20 - - - - - - 0.04 3.3 4.69 102.30 - - - - - - 0.04 3.4 483 102.40 - - - - - - 0.04 3.5 497 102.50 - - - - - - 0.05 3.6 511 102.60 - - - - - - 0.05 3.7 525 102.70 - - - - - - 0.05 3.8 540 102.80 - - - - - - 0.05 3.9 554 102.90 - - - - - - 0.05 4.0 568 103.00 - - - - - - 0.05 4.1 585 103.05 - - - - - - 0.05 4.1 603 103.10 - - - - - - 0.05 42 620 103.15 - - - - - - 0.05 4.2 637 103.20 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 654 10325 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 672 103.30 - - - - - - 0.05 4.4 689 103.35 - - - - - - 0.05 4.4 706 103.40 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 724 103.45 - - - - - 0.05 4.5 741 103.50 - - - - - - 0.05 4.6 774 103.55 - - - - - - 0.05 4.6 806 103.60 - - - - - - 0.05 4.7 839 103.65 - - - - - - 0.05 4,7 872 103.70 - - - - - - 0.05 4.8 905 103.75 - - - - - - 0.05 4.8 937 103.80 - - - - - 0.05 4.9 970 103.85 - - - - - - 0.05 4.9 1,003 103.90 - - - -- - - 0.05 5.0 1,035 103.95 - - - - - - 0.05 5.0 1,068 . 104.00 - - - ' - - - 0.05. 5.1 1,173 104.10 - - - - - - 0.05 5.2 1278 104.20 - -- - - - - 0.05 5.3 1,383 104.30 - - - - - - 0.05 5.4 1,488_ 104.40 - - - - - - 0.05 5.5 1,593 104.50 - - - - - - 0.05 5.6 1,698 104.60 - - - - - - 0.05 5.7 1,803 104.70 - - - - - - 0.05 5.8 1,908 104.80 - - - - - - 0.05 5.9 2,013 104.90 - - - - - - 0.05 6.0 2,118 105.00 - - - - - 0.05 6.1 2,286 105.10 - - - - - - 0.05 62 2,453 10520 - - - - - - 0A5 6.3 2,621 105.30 - - - - - - 0.05 6.4 2,789 105.40 - - - - - - 0.05 6.5 2,956 105.50 - - - - - - 0.05 Continues on next page... i BLDG 1 Page 3 Stage I Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Cuty.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 6.6 3,124 105.60 - - - - - - 0.05 6.7 3,292 105.70 - - - - - - 0.05 6.8 . 3,460 105.80 - - - - - - 0.05 6.9 3,627 105.90 - - - - - - 0.05 7.0 3,795 106.00 - - - - - - 0.05 7.1 4,035 106.10 - - - - - - 0.05 7.2 4,275 106.20 - - - - - - 0.05 7.3 4,516 106.30 - - - - - - 0.05 7.4 4,756 106.40 - - - - - 0.05 7.5 4,996 106.50 - - - - - - 0.05 7.6 5,236 106.60 - - - - - . - 0.05 7.7 5,476 106.70 - - - - - 0.05 7.8 5,717 106.80 - - - --- - - 0.05 7.9 5,957 106.90 - - - - - - 0.05 8.0 6,197 107.00 - - - - - - 0.05 Reservoir Report Page Reservoir No. 3 BLDG 1 b-2a Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [A] [B] [C] Rise(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Span(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.(ft) = 0-.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eqn.Exp. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Length(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage - Slope(°k) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 N Value = .000 .000 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multistage = - Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft Note:All outfk*s have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage/Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Cult'.A Cult'.B Cufv.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (c#s) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 0.0 00 96.50 - - - - - - 0.00 0.1 14 96.60 - - - - - - 0.00 0.2 28 96.70 - - - - - - 0.00 0.3 .43 96.80 - - - - - - 0.00 0.4 57 96.90 - - - - - - 0.00 0.5 71 97.00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.6 85 97.10 - - - - - - 0.01 0.7 99 97.20 - - - - - - 0.01 0.8 114 97.30 - - - - - - 0.01 0.9 128 97.40 - - - - - - 0.01 1.0 142 97.50 - - - - - - 0.01 1.1 156 97.60 - - - - - - 0.01 1.2 170 97.70 - - - - -. - 0.01 1.3 185 97.80 - - - - -- - 0.02 . 1.4 199 97.90 - - - - - - 0.02 1.5 213 98.00 - - - - - - 0.02 1.6 227 98.10 - - - - - - 0.02 1.7 241 98.20 - - - - - - 0.02 1.8 256 98.30 - - - - - - 0.03 1.9 270 98.40 - - - - - - 0.03 2.0 284 98.50 - - - - - - 0.03 2.1 298 98.60 - - - - - - 0.03 2.2 312 98.70 - - - - - - 0.03 2.3 327 98.80 - - - - - - 0.03 2.4 341 98.90 - - - - - - 0.03 2.5 355. 99.00 - - - - - - 0.03 Continues on next page... BLDG 1 b-2a Page 2 Stage/Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culy.A Cuty.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2.6 369 99.10 - - - - - - 0.04 2.7 383 99.20 - - - - - - 0.04 2.8 . 398 99.30 - - - - - - 0.04 2.9 412 99.40 - - - - - - 0_04 3.0 426 99.50 - - - - - - 0.04 3.1 440 99.60 - - - - - - 0.04 3.2 454 99.70 - - - - - 0.04 3.3 469 99.80 - - - - - - 0.04 3.4 483 99.90 - - - - - - 0.04 3.5 497 100.00 - - - - - - 0.05 3.6 511. 100.10- - - - - - . - 0.05 3.7 525 10020 - - - - - - 0.05 3.8 540 100.30 - - - - - - 0.05 3.9 554 100.40 - - - - - - 0.05 4.0 568 100.50 - - - - - - 0.05. 4.1 572 100.55 - - - - - - 0.05 4.1 576 100.60 - - - - - - 0.Q5. 4.2 580 100.65 - - - - - - 0.05 4.2 584 100.70 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 588 100.75 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 591 100.80 - - - - - 0.05 4.4 595 100.85 - - - - - - 0.05 4.4 599 1.00.90 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 603 100..95 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 607 101.00 - - - - - - 0.05 4.6 633 101.10 - - - - - - 0.05 4.7 658 101.20 - - - - - - 0.05 4.8 684 101.30 - - - - - - 0.05 4.9 710 101.40 - - - - - - 0.05 5.0 736 101.50 - - - - - - 0.05 5.1 761 101.60 - - - - - - 0.05 52 787 101.70 - - - - - - 0.05 5.3 813 101.80 - - - - - - 0.05 5.4 838 10t.90 - - - - - - 0.05 5.5 864 102.00 - - - - - - 0.05 5.6 945 102.10 - - - - - - 0.05 5.7 1,025 1,02.20_ - - - - - - 0.05 5.8 . 1,106 102.30 - - - - - 0.05 5.9 1,187 102AG - - - - - -- 0.05 6.0 1,267 102.50 - - - - - - 0.05 6.1 1,348 102.60 - - - - - - 0.05 6.2 1,429 102.70 - - - - - - 0.05 6.3 1,510 102.80 - - - - - - _ 0.05. 6.4 1,590 102.90 - - - - - - 0.05 6.5 1,671 103.00 - - - - - - 0.05 6.6 1,842 103.1.0 - - - - - - 0.05 6.7 2,012 103.20 - - - - - - 0A5 6.8 2,183 103.30 - - - - - - 0.05 6.9 2,353 103.40 - - - - - - 0.05 7.0 2,524 103.50 - - - - - - 0.05 Continues on next page... BLDG 7b-2a Page 3 Stage/Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culy.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Wgir C Discharge (ft) (cuft). (ft) , (cfs). (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 7.1 2,694 103.60 — — — — — — 0.05 7.2 2,865 103.70 — — — — — — 0.05 7.3 . 3,035 103.80 — — — — — — 0.05 7.4 3,206 103.90 — — — — — — 0.05 7.5 3,376 104.00 — — — — — — 0.05 Reservoir Report Page Reservoir No. 4 BLDG 2b-3a Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [c] [A]- [B] [C] Rise(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Span(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eqn.Exp. = 0.00 0.00 0:00 Length(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 N Value = .000 .000 :000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = - Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft Note:All ouffims have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage I Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culv.A Cult'.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft). (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) . WS). (cfs). (cfs) . . (cfs) 0.0 0d. 90.50 - - - - - - 0.00 0.1 28 90.60 - - - - - - 0.00 02 57 90.70 - - - - - - 0.00 0.3 85 90.80 - - - - - - 0.01 0.4 1.14 90.90 - - - - - - 0.01 0.5 142 91.00 - - - - - - 0.01 0.6 170 91.10. - - - - - - 0.01. 0.7 199 91.20 - - - - - - 0.01 0.8 227 91.30 - - - - - - 0.02 0.9 256 91.40 - - - - - - 0.02 1.0 284 91..50 - - - - - - 0.02 1.1 312 91.60 - - - - - - 0.02 1.2 341. 91.70 - - - - - - 0.03 1.3 369 91.80 - - - - - - 0.03 1 A 398 91.90 - - - - - - 0.04 . 1.5 426 92.00 - - - - - - .0.04 1.6 454 92.10 - - - - - - 0.04 1.7 483 92.20' - - - - - - 0.05 1.8 511 92.30 - - - - - - 0.05 1.9 540 92.40 - - - - - - 0.06 2.0 568 92.50 - - - - - - 0.06 2.1 596 92.60 - - - - - - 0.06 2.2 625 92.70. - - - - - - 0.06. 2.3 653 92.80 - - - - - - 0.07 2.4 682 92.90 - - - - - 0.07 2.5 710. 93.00 - - - - - - 0.07 Confines on next page... BLDG 2b3a page 2 Stage I Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culy.A Cuter.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (CUM (ft) (cfs)- (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2.6 738. 93.10 - - - - - - 0.07 2.7 767 93.20 - - - - - - 0.07 2.8 795. 93.30 - - - - - - 0.08 -2:9 824 -93.40 - - - - - 0.08 3.0 852 93.50 - - - - = 0.08 3.1 880 93.60 - - - - - - 0.08 3.2 909. 93.70. - - - - - - 0.08 3.3 937 93.80 - - - - - - 0.09 3.4 966 93.90 - - - - - - - 0.09 3.5 994 94.00 - - - - - - 0.09 3.6 1,022 94.10 - - - - - - 0.09 3.7 1,051 9420 - - - - - - 0.09 3.8 1,079 94.30 - - - - - - 0.10 3.9 1,108 94.40 - - - - - - 0.10 4.0 1,136 94.50 - - - - - - 0.10 42 1,159 94.65 - - - - - - 0.10 4.3 1,183 94.80. - - - - - - 0.10 4.5 1206 94.95 - - - - - - 0.10 4.6 1,230 95.10 - - - - - - 0.10 4.8 1,253 95.25 - - - - - - 0.10 4.9 1,276 95.40 - - - - - - 0.10 5.1 1,300 95.55 - - - - - - 0.10 5.2 1,323. 95.70 - - - - - - 0.10 5.4 1,347 95.85 - - - - - - 0.10 5.5 1,370- . 96.00 - - - - - - 0.10 5.6 1,389 96.05 - - - - - - 0.10 5.6 1,408 96.10 - - - - - - 0.10 5.7 1,426 96.15 - - - - - - 0.10 5.7 1,445. 96.20 - - - - - - 0.10 5.8 1,464 9625 - - - - - - 0.10 5.8 1,483 96.30 - - - - - - 0.10 5.9 1,502 96.35 - - - - - - 0.10 5.9 1,520 96.40 - - - - - - 0.10 6.0 1,539 96.45 - - - - - - 0.10 6.0 1,558. _ 96.50- - - - - - - 0.10 6.1 1,621 96.55 - - - - - - 0.10 6.1 1,683 96.60 - - - - -- - 0.10 62 1,746 96.65 - - - - - 0.10 6.2 1.,809._ 96.70 - - - - - - 0.10 6.3 1,871 96.75 - - - - - - 0.10 6.3 1,934 96.80. - - - - - - 0.10 6.4 1,997 96.85 - - - - - - 0.10 6.4 21060 96.90 - - - - - - 0.10 6.5 2,1.22 96.95 - - - - - - 0.10 6.5 2,185 97'-00. - - - - - - 0.10 6.6 Z435 97.10 - - - - - - 0.10 6.7 21685 9720. - - - - - - 0.10 6.8 2,935 97.30 - - - - - - 0.10 6.9 3,185 97.40 - - - - - - 0.10 7.0 3,436 97.50 - - - - - 0.10 Continues on next page... BLDG 2b3a Page 3 Stage/ Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Culy.A Culy.B Culy.C Weir A Wei B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs). (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) _ (cfs) (cfs) 7.1 3,686 97.60 — — — — — — 0.10 7.2 3,936 97.70 — — — — — — 0.10 7.3 . 4,1.86 97.80 — — — — — — 0.10 7.4 4,436 97.90 — — — — — 0.10 7.5 4,686 98.00 — — — — — — 0.10 i Reservoir Report Page 1 Reservoir No. 5 BL©G B Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [S] [C] JAI [131 [C] Rise(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Span(in) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eqn.Exp. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Length(ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 N Value = .000 .000 .000 Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mufti-Stage = - Taitwater Elevation = 0.00 ft Node:Afl outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage I Storage I(Discharge'Table Stage. Storage Elevation Culy.A Cult'.B Culy.C Wetr A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (CUM (ft) (cfs). (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cis). leis) 0.0 00 10i_00 - - - - - - 0.00 0.1 14 101.10 - - - - - - 0.00 0.2 28 101.20 - - - - - - 0.00 0.3 43 101.30 - - - - - - 0.00 0.4 57 101.40 - - - - - - 0.00 0.5 71 101.50 - - - - - - 0.00 0.6 85 101.60. -. - - 0.01 0.7 99 101.70 - - - - - - - 0.01 0.8 114 101.80 - - - - - 0.01 0.9 128 101.90 - - - - - - 0.01 1.0 142 102-00 - -- - - - - 0.01 1.1 156 102.10 - - - - - - 0.01 12 170 102.20 - - - 0.01 1.3 185 102.30 - - - - - 0.02 1.4 199 102.40 - - - - -_ - 0.02 1.5 213 102.50 - - - - - - 0.02 1.6 227 102.60 - - - - - - 0.02 1.7 241 102.70 - - - - - - 0.02 1.8 256 102.80 - - - - - - 0.03 1.9 270 102.90 - - - - - - 0.03 2.0 284 . 103.00 - - - - - - 0.03 . 2.1 298 103.10 - - - - - - 0.03 2.2 312 103.20 - - - - - - 0.03 2.3 327 103.30 - - - - - - 0A3 2.4 341 103.40 - - - - - - 0.03 2.5 355 103.50 - - - - - - 0.03 Continues on next page... BLDG 6 Page 2 Stage i Storage/ Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation CuFv.A Cult'.B Culy.C Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ff) (cuff) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cis) (cfs) (cfs) 2.6 369 103.60 - - - - - - 0.04 2.7 383 403.70 - - - - - - 0.04 2.8 398 103.80 - - - - - - 0.04 2.9 412 103.90 - - - - - 0.04 3.0 426 104.00 - - - - - - 0.04 -3.1 440 104.10 - - - - - - 0.04 3.2 454 10420 - - - - - - 0.Q4 3.3 469 104.30 - - - - - - 0.04 3.4 483 104.40 - - - - - - 0.Q4 3.5 497 104.50 - - - - - - 0.05 3.6 511 104.60 - - - - - 0.95 3.7 525 104.70 - - - - - - 0.05 3.8 540 104.80 - - - - - - 0.05 3.9 554 104.90 - - - - - - 0.05 4.0 568 105.00 - - - - - - 0.05 4.1 585 105.05 - - - - - - Q.0$ 4.1 601 105.10 . - - - - - - Q.P5 4.2 618 105.15 - - - - - - 0.05 4.2 634 105.20 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 651 105.25 - - - - - - 0.05 4.3 667 105.30 . - - - - - - 0.05 4.4 684 105.35 - - - - - - 0.05 4.4 700 105.40 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 717 105.45 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 733 105,50 . - - - - - - 0,Q5 4.6 773 105.55 - - - - - 0.05 4.6 812 105.60 - - - - - - 0:¢5 4.7 852 105.65 - - - - - - 0.05 4.7 891 105.70 - - - - - - 0.05 4.8 931 105.75 - - - - - - 0.05 4.5 970 105.80 - - - - - - 0.05 4.9 1,010 105.85 - - - - - - 0.05 4.9 1,049- 105.90 - - - - - - 0.05 5.0 1,089 105.95 - - - - - - 0.05 5.0 1,128 106.00 - - - - - - 0.Q5 5.1 1,299 106.10 - - - - - - 0.05 5.2 1,470 106.20 . - - - - - - 0.05 5.3 1,641 106.30 - - - - - 0.05 5.4 1,812 . 106.40 - - - - - - 0.05 5.5 1,983 106.50 - - - - - - 0.05 5.6 Z154 106.60 - - - - - - 0.05 5.7 2,325 10+6.70 - - - - - - 0.05 5.8 2,496 106.80 - - - - - - 0.05 5.9 2,667 106.90 - - - - - - 0.05 6.0 2,838_ 107.00 - - - - - - 0.05 6.1 3,096 107.10 - - - - - - 0.05 6.2 3,354 10720 - - - - - 0.05 6.3 3,612 107.30 - - - - - - 0.05 6.4 3,870 107.40 - - - - - - 0.05 6.5 4,128 107.50 - - - - - - 0.05 Continues on next page... BLDG 6 Page 3 Stage/ Storage/ Discharge 'Table Stage Storage Elevation Luiv.A Cuiv.B Cuiv.L Weir A Weir B Weir C Discharge (ft) (cuft) (ft) (cfs) (cf.$) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 6.6 4,3W 107.60 — — — — — — 0.0 6.7 4,644 107.70 — — — — — — 0.05 6.8 . 4,902 i 07:fs0 — — — — — — 0.05 6.9 5,160 107.90 — — — — — — 0.05 7.0 5,418 108.00 — — — — — — 0.05 APPENDIX I Hydrograph Summary Report Page 6 Hyd. Hydrograph ` Peak 4 Thne Tires to Volume Return Inflow Maxffm-.;t Maxon t Hydrograph No. type raw f Intersaf peak period hyd(s) elevation storms demtptkm (cft) (nun" �( hwai), i'=1Ri. �F (Yr5) I 1 J I 8 SCS Runoff f 0.4 2. 724 f 0.03 2 — — B 6 ff 106.5 9 SCS Runoff 0.8 2 724 0.06 10 — — Bldg 6 10 SCS Runoff 1.1 2 724 0.08 25 — —. Bidg 6 11 SCS Runoff 1.3 2 724 0.09 50 — Bldg 6 12 _ SCS Runoff 1.6 2 724 0.11 100 — . — Bldg 6 13 Reservoir 0.0 2 782 0.03 2 8 104.36 475 Bldg 6 14 Pxservok 0.1 2 726 0.06 10 9 106.10 1292 Bkig 6 15 Reservoir 01 2 72O O.OB 25 10 106.43 _ _ 18% Bldg 6 16 Reservoir 0.1 2 716 0.09 50 11 106.75 2416 Bldg 2A3B 17 Reservoir 0.1 2 712 0.11 100 12 107.06 2992 Bldg 6 Proj. fife: BLDG6.GPW OF file: SAMPLE.IDF Run date: 06-29-2000 APPENDIX J ,lou esign SHEE, NO OF rofessionals, inc. (.ALCLII,ATEE)By DATE DESIGN STORM FIEOUENCY ears , / eivilengineers •planners • surveyors•gis CHECKED BY .. DATE Run tne>rs�es�nt A Y. C T.C.. 1 Q morn V t To A' C IhGr. o min. i r ch 0t.,;; S. Qs NOTE p —j Sr / s u [� o 0,35 0, �� ��' 6 o 4 ,� s f5" ? p/ o o, o, -Ot 16 0. 1 A, • S 8 0, a 3 t^I.�� Q. d �. •.'7 r.7 �w I 0, 13 ,o"/o . —pr —.. . !.5 C,.15 or o �."— 0 .3.3 o.g o,Z6 0 . ...... ........ —., Hydrograph Summary Report Page • Hy& Hydrograph Peak TWO Tirneto Vokxne Retum Inflow MaXkFNxn MaAIMM Hydrograph No. type flow kdervat peak period hyd(s) elevation storage desciptkm (om) cat i knin) (acft) tyfS) (ftr (CUM s SCS Runoff 0.4 2 724 0.03 2 — — — B 231f 96-0 9 SCS Runoff 0.8 .2 724 0.06 t0 — — — Bldg Zb3a 10 SCS Runoff 0.9 2 724 0.06 25 — — Bldg 2b-3a 11 SCS Runoff 1.3 2 724 0.09 50 — Bldg 2b3a 12 SCS Runoff 1.5 2 724 0.10 fi00 — -- Bldg 2b3a 13 Reservoir 0:.1 . 2 756 0:03. 2 8 M43 547 Bkig 2B-M 14 Reservoir 01 2 754 0.06 10 9 94:56 1145 Bldg 2B-34 15 Reservoir at 2 740 0.06 25 10 .96:42 1280 Bldg 2B-3A 16 Reservoir 0.1 2 726 0.09 50 11 96.80 1936 Bldg 2B3A 17 Reservoir 0.1 2 724 0.10 t00 12 97.07 2353 Bldg 263A Proj. file: BLDG2-3.GPW ID F file:.SAMPLE.OF Run date: 06-29-2000 Hydrograph Summary Report Page 9 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak T6ne Tineto Voiume Return Inflow Maxhnun Mazkmsn Hydrograph No. type flow kdervaf peak. period hyd(s) elevation storage description (om) tcfsz tom) tit (a UM) tit i s 8 SCS Runoff 0.3 2 724 002 2 — Bldg 1 tf104.5 9 SCS Runoff 0.7 2 724 0.05 10 — — Bldg#1 10 SCS Runoff 09 2 724 0.06 25 — BMG#1 11 SCS Runoff 1.1 2 724 0.07 50 — Bldg#1 12 SCS Runoff 1.3 2 724 0.09 10D — — Bldg#1 13 Reservoir 00 2 776 UO2 2 8 10t_25 319 Bldg 1 14 Reservoir 0.1 2 728 0.05 10 9 103.91 1009 Btdg 1 15 Reservoir 0.1 2 724 0:05 25 10 10427 1458 Bkia t 16 Reserveir 0.1 2 720 0-07 50 11 10436 1864 Bldg 1 17 Reservoir 0.1 2 716 0-09 t00 t2 105.t4 2357 Bldg f Pray- file: BLDG1AGPW OF file: SAMPLEADF Run date: 06-29-2000 Hydrograph Summary Report -Page 2 Hyd. Hydrograpt► Peak Tune Time to Volume Return h►Row Maxknwn Maximum Hydrograph Na, type Raw interval peak period hyd(s) elevation storage description (fin) (Cft) (MM) (MM) (Wft) (Yrs) (ft) (cuft) 8 SCS Runoff 0.3 2 724 0.02 2 — B 1.2 ff 102.0 9 SCS Runoff O 7 2 724 0.05 10 — Bfdg 1&2a 10 SCS Runoff (}9 2 724 0.06 25 — — Bldg 1b-2a 11 SCS Runoff 1.0 2 724 0.07 50 — — Bldg 1 b-2a 12 SCS Runoff 1.2 2 724 0.08 100 — Bldg 1b-2a 13 Reservoir 0.0 2 774 0.02 2 8 99.41 414 Bldg 1B-2A 14 Reservoir 0.1 2 728 0.05 10 9 102.14 9W Bldg 1 B-2A 15 Reservoir 0_1 2 722 0.06 25 to 102 S3 1375 Bldg.1:8-2A 16 Reservoir 0.1 2 72D 0.07 50 11 103.05 1754 Bldg IA-2B 17 Reservoir O.f 2 716 0-08 1O0 12 103.28 2156 Bldg I&ZA Proj. fife: BLDG1-2.GPW OF file: SAMPLE.IDF Run date: 06-29-2000 TO*N OF SOUTH WINDSOF�� GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS 7 PROJECT STREET CHECKED By 9���IIlI�Illl�illlll 13-INI SNISMA8 09���1��1�1�11�111111 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORY SEWER SVSTEW DE319N FORM 2.2 PROJECT DESIGNED MY DATE 6 l C6 `3 00 STREET FIRM CHECKED SY SHEET N• a S31VMOV3H All3VdV0 'ilnd00 A113013A 39VN3AV_ o ooQN -D a oo o� Ilk 3dOlS = o pQ o 00 3d Id .40 HIS N31 o p o o o a 0 0 0 0 o O nS f7° 3ZIS 3dld ND W31SAS NI 0 m M �- 0 ),IISN31Nl 'I1VANIVS r► _ in to i w31SAS NI IV .4o wns tO 1-0 `° 0 0 0 6 6o NiSV8 Ho1V0 (015 9NIN31N3 ZVIa m o ca o p o W p 31411 03lVlnwn00V fl 3did NI 3wi1 0 0 131N1 0131111 a P o 0 0 o t� 0 1N3w93S 3N11 - 0 II-23 LINE SEGMENT TIME TO INLET TIME IN PIPE ACCUMULATED TIME I'AI ENTERING CAT CH BASIN SUM OF Al IN SYSTEM I Illinois I mail a - 0 IN SYSTEM LENGTH OF PIPE FULL CAPACITY I Igloo IN logo vosomm Hinos 4o NIAO.L STATION I3 OFFSET STATION__OFFSET_ N v G STRUCTURE TYPE a ap ..q3 TOP OF ORATE ELEV, O Y 0 OUTLET STA. n uT DESIGN W.S.ELEV. Q' . to JL iJL �' C OUTLET T.W.EL. C OUTLET EL. � _ p• EL. ps l?.,, l`l _ LENGTH �� LENGTHS_ EL. v.6o z SLOPE ��1�L� SLOPE ?, �9% EL. O INLET OUTLET CONTROL M• •M * he • Le• INLET OUTLET CONTROL Mry • M♦ be•le• 0 SIZE CONTROL ; SIZE CO.NTROI TYPE n -�L HW Ke H d� - = TW he LS HW = TYPE n HW Ke H de - = TW he LS HW o _ AV _lam. e.o I3 3,o '' In 1 s H N STATION-OFFSET STATION_ OFFSET C �- STRUCTURE TYPE G� � I o 4' TOP OFORATE ELEV. n v A Y m 5s, 4 DESIGN W.S. ELEV. 9 5. So JLy : EL. > EL. o < � rc t O= `l `L`� EL..�3, EL.�3.?, p. 8. 69 y ! LENOTH 2,00 _ LENGTH ' < SLOPE SLOPE 0.9 V, INLET INl[T QJ CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL M1M• M♦ h•-lei F ; CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL MW • N ♦ A•-Le• F ; Z ; RZE Y n Mw HW Ke H de TW TW h• LS HW = YPE n Nw HW Ke H do TW TW he LS- HW = _ a �L3 I•S o.o I, _ • 0 C 9 N 1 1 1 I Y I 1 I 1 I 1 t Y I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 i 1 I I I STATION OFFSET STATIONS OFFSET STRUCTURE TYPE o 0 TOPOFGRATE ELEV. Ob+>� OUTLET STA. -DESIGN W.S.ELEV. Ivo•6y .Il. ` ro rl N JL OUTLET T.W.EL. i C OUTLET EL. _ pe ti,4A EL. %EL. `f`t ,30 LENGTN.-a.f? _ LENGTH a p EL. So EL. 17� _ SLOPE L: ,It SLOPE . INLET OUTLET CONTROL NW •N • he - L[e INLET 0 SIZE CONTROL ; OUTLET CONTROL NW • N♦ he-L[• SIZE CO.MTROL 3 TYPE n pE. HW KO H dC - -- TW ho LS HW = TYPE n m HW K0 H do - = TW Ao LS HW o = 0,013 1;4� 17.0 ,88 F10 +7 m fq H S� tv STATION__s? OFFSET STATION.,__ OFFSET_._._ C STRUCTURE TYPE _ I" '" f o H-3 TOP OFGRATE ELEV. o n 30 m 1 Q 1.5 6 DESIGN W.S. ELEV. .Q N < n _ > EL. 0 0, D 7EL.__ EL. EL. r p s W LENGTH-J _ LENGTH v < SLOPE .. a a u SLOPE INLET OUTLET CONTIIOL NW•M♦ Ae-L[eIML CTCONTROL 9; CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL NW• N « A•-LEe qx§l u p T�'� MW ♦0 ~ = TYPE MIM n HW KN H do TW ho LS HW n HW KO H do �0 TW Ao LS; HW +I�n I.06 fo�' � o ELL tflid � N :, 1� :E W DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers . planners • surveyors . gis Transmitted via certified mail Dear Current Abutting Property Owner June 30, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates DPI Project No. 91-595 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut In accordance with regulations of the Inland Wetlands Agency and Planning& Zoning Commission, we are required to noti�'you that applications have been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Planning&Zoning Commission and Inland Wetlands Agency. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the to ask questions and/or give comments, however,you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application(s) Mll be heard,please contact Debbie Wark, Recording Secretary or Michele Lipe, Deputy Planning Director or Jeff Folger, Wetlands Officer at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253 or 252,or 229,respectively. Thank you. Since Piy, D N PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: , Peter R. eMallie Principal cc: K.F. Properties, L.L.C. Cummings &Lanza Richard Adams Jeffrey Folger Marcia Banach✓ Galen B. Semnrebon,P.E. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 -Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers . planners . surveyors . gis June 30,2000 Abutters List Wheeler Estates Smith Street DPI Protect No. 91-595 1.) Redfield Homeowner's Association,P.O. Box 853, South Windsor, CT 06074-0853. 2.) Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford, Inc., c/o Arnold J. Grant III, MAI, 100 Constitution Plaza, Hartford,CT 06103 3.) _ Margaret R. French, 198 Smith Street 4.) Rosal Conrado &Maria Perez, 6 Diggins Court 5.) Jillmarie Serignese, 8 Diggins Court 6.) DPIn.;s J. &Donna M. Ch,-:rchill, 10 Diggins Court 7.) Divyesh&11 ena Daial, 12 Diggins Court 8.) Jo-Anne Piazza, 14 Diggins Court 9.) Debra M. Javit, 16 Diggins Court 10.) Robert&Lori Wilson, 18 Diggins Court 11.) James&Adrienne Machowski, 14 Drake Court 12.) Vincent&Christine Dileone, 16 Drake Court 13.) Jennifer Te11_an, 17 Drake Corr_ 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut Q6074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 9 Fax: (860)291-8757 .ti w DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. RE C E 0 V rr_- D civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis JUN 4n 2000 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING UPT. TO: Marcia Banach,Director of Planning DATE: June 30,2000 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 RE: Wheeler Estates SRD/Subdivision DPI PROJ.NO.:91-595 Smith Street South Windsor,Connecticut WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑for your use ❑at your request 4�for your approval by PZC ❑for your files ®for review and comment ❑other THE FOLLOWING: Seven(7)blueprint sets of the site and subdivision plans,completed application form,application fee(client check),abutter notification letter,abutter listing,drainage computations(2 sets),site plan,subdivision and architectural checklists. James Bubaris will be submitting his traffic report under separate cover. Please apprise this office of any staff comments or concerns, and of the anticipated hearing date. Thank you. D/-;e . ROFESSIONALS,INC. By: t. a lie - -- -- Principal cc:K.F.Properties L.L.C. Cummings&Lanza Richard Adams Galen B.Semprebon,P.E. James Bubaris,P.E. Garrick Mantana Robert Schechinger,Jr. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 -Fax: (860)291-8757 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM < Application No: 66 P REC Official Receipt Date: [Receipt No: JUN APPLICANT: L.Q. ADDRESS: 176 Smith Street South Windsor CT 06074 • OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: K.F. Properties, L.L.0 /Walter P. & Lucyna Kebalo ADDRESS: 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 176 Smith Street & 188 Smith Street ASSESSOR'S MAP# 17 PARCEL # 1&2 ZONE A-20 NAME, ADDRESS, TEL&FAX# OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie, Principal, Design Professionals, Inc. 165 S. Satellite Rd. South Windsor, CT 06074 Tel. 291-8755 Fax 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑Minor $j Major ❑ Conditional Approval ® Special Exception to Article 4.1 _1 (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development - ❑ Earth Filling(Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14- Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) Temporary and Conditional Permit for ❑ Major Home Occupation for ❑ Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. G �•C��l�o J ' �� Signature of Applicant Signature of Property Owner (See reverse side for additional information) NAME: Wheeler Estates Senior Residence Development LOCATION: Smith Street opposite Wheeler Redd TYPE OF PROJECT: Subdivision & Senior Residence Development ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE CHECKLIST The following items must be submitted, in accordance with Section 9.1 of the Zoning Regulations at the time of a site plan application for an industrial or commercial building, or high-density housing. x 1. Site plan of the property (per Section 8 of the Zoning Regulations) X_ 2. Architectural elevations of the proposed building(s) 3. Types, styles and colors of building materials, exterior facades and facing, and fenestrations (samples suggested) Colors to be determined. x 4. Special architectural features (if applicable) ; x 5. Colors, materials, and location of lighting 6. Design of signs . 7. Mechanical hardware proposed on or around the building and roof, including trash compactor, and auxiliary storage areas Exterior a/c units to be installed to rear of units (on the ground) No dumpsters proposed. x 8. Landscape plan indicating location, types, sizes, and quantities of proposed plant materials X 9. Lighting plans All of above-required information/materials have been provided. N // AAA ?n Signature Date Please be. aware that missing information or incomplete information may result in a delay in action by the Committee on this application. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis Transmitted via certified mail Dear Cur-rent Abutting Property Owner June 30, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates DPI Project No. 91-595 Smith Street - South Windsor, Connecticut In accordance with regulations of the Inland Wetlands Agency and Planning& Zoning Cornsmission,we are required to notify you that applications have been filed on the property abutting yours and is subject to a hearing by the Planning&Zoning Commission and Inland Wetlands Agency. The application and plans are on file with the South Windsor Planning Department in the Town Hall. As an abutting property owner you are invited to the hearing(s)to ask questions and./or give comments,however,you are not required to attend. You may also submit written comments regarding the application(s)prior to the hearing if you so desire. For further information regarding the specific date this application(s)will be heard,please contact Debbie Wark,Recording Secretary or Michele Lipe,Deputy Planning Director or Jeff Folger, Wetlands Officer at the South Windsor Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.253 or 252,or 229,respectively. Thank you. S*A ly, N PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: Y"W R. eMallie Principal cc: K.F. Properties, L.L.C. Cummings&Lanza Richard Adams Jeffrey Folger Marcia BanachV Galen B. Semprebon,P.E. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers . planners . surveyors . gis June 30,2000 Abutters List Wheeler Estates Smith Street DPI Project No, 91-595 l.) Redfield Homeowner's Association,P.U. Box 853, South Windsor,CT 06074-0853. 2.) Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford,Inc.,c/o Arnold J. Grant III,MAI, 100 Constitution Plaza,Hartford, CT 06103 3.) - Margaret R. French, 198 Smith Street 4.) Rosal Conrado &Maria Perez, 6 Diggins Court 5.) Jillmarie Serignese, 8 Diggins Court 6) Demais J. &Donn-a M. Chm:rchill, 10 Diggins Court 7.) Divyesh&Heena Dalai, 12 Diggins Court 8.) Jo=Anne Piazza, 14 Diggins Court 9.) Debra M. Javit, 16 Diggins Court 10.) Robert&Lori Wilson, 18 Diggins Court 11.) James&Adrienne Machowski, 14 Drake Court 12.) Vincent&Christine Dileone, 16 Drake Court 13.) Jennifer Tellan, 17 Drake Court 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 • Fax: (860)291-8757 Kebalo Legal Description 91-595 Beginning at a point at the southwest corner of the property herein descries said point being feather marked by a moment;thencae N I W 23' 36"E,along property-now or formerly of lean Marc Jacques,a distance of 4176.96 feet to a mere stone;thence S 67'IV I&E,along property now or formerly of the Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford,Inc,a distance of 454.70 fmt to a point; thence S I P-51'--58"W,along property now or formerly of said Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford;Inc,a distance of 449.91 feet to an iron pin in a mere stone-thence S 18.51' W W,along.property now or-formerly of Margaret R_French,a distance of 639.86 feet to a mere stone,thence N 86,46'02"W,akmg the northerly sired line of Smith Street,a distance of 276.70 feet to a point;thence N 65.16'32"W along the northerly street line of Smith Street,a distance of 178.40 feet to a monument,said monument being the point and place of beginning. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS APPLICANT K F Properties LLC PROJECT NAME Wheeler_ Estates SRD This checklist must be signed by plan preparer(P.E./LS.) declaring that ail'required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Ch mark for each item supplied. 1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information: a. Name, address and telephone of applicant b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. c. Name of Development d. Date when drawings were made. 2 Key Map: An over-all map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals either 100 feet or 200 feet This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage;acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Outline of buildings. c. Layout of streets. d. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500 feet e. Names of abutting property owners. J f. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. . Driveway cuts on abutting r 9 y g properties and any properties across from Proper site. h. Distance to and name of nearest intersection street 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklist for Architecture and Design Review. 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site,drawn to a s e of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets 24"x 36; ith a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x 24"with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking spaces. c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and po gs other structures, inducing signs, outride lighting, and dumpsters(on concrete pad and screened). e-. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose. f. Name s of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at comers and angles of all streets and nd at all points of curvature and tan gency. The monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these CGS points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. . w h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated.` 2 certification; P.E./LS. seals and signatures. S. 'Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to feet on sheets not exceeding-24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: a. All existing and.proposed buildings. b. Curb Lines and / pavement width, sidewalks. C. Edstin and sanitary 9 Proposed nary sewers. d. Existing and proposed water and-all existing utilities. e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any trees to be saved should be shown. f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one- foot intervals and spot elevations. g . Regulated wetlands and d 100-year floodplain or note that none are present jVo fIoj 1'lws, wn}cl 0,. L.nir S�sQ` -h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch-basins, endwails, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes and elevations of structures. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and-minimum size of stone drain lines shall be 15 inches,within Town ROW.) If plan/profile sheet is provided all of this does not need-to be shown. Only top of frame elevations and inverts of open discharge pipe shall be shown on this plan. L connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system.as needed. J j. Location and indications of existing brook channels, and IO0-year flood limits. k. A-2 &T 2 Certification• P.E./LS. seals and signatures. 6. Landscaping plan: - ✓ 7. Drainage calculations: -Zero Runo ff Increase per attached guidelines. 8. Traffic Report: TO 9. Plans and Profiles: A an and. PI profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally, and I inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: Of WW.-r Y44 a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. " b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, sanitary sewer (including house sewer), foundation drains, lot lines, buildings including all utilities with elevations(top frame and inverts), size,type, length, slopes of pipes. C. Sight line at driveway&street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profil e will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations, sizes, lengths and slopes of pipes. f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. c� p o��n� Yh,n4 t �b took . -✓ g. CGS daQm shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls. The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine / the accessibility of these controls. J h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, inverts, top of frame,sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a-plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet 11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems. U13��U� nPLAty AREK P.E./ ti.s. DATE June 23, 19158 VOL. 1 '7 8 4 PAGE 184 LAWN Sf4 GO a m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•cO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 30, 2005 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 175 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: App 00-28P, Wheeler Estates Subdivision Dear Mr. Kebalo: As we discussed, the fee in lieu of open space for the above-referenced subdivision was set at $9,500.00 in July of 2003. This amount is 10% of the appraised value of the subdivision land prior to subdivision approval. This fee is payable on a per-lot basis at the time of the initial conveyance of each lot. To date the town has collected $3,400.00 of this fee. The remaining balance of $6,100.00 will be spread out amongst the three remaining lots (# 2, 4, and 6) with each lot responsible for a fee in the amount of$2,033.33. On or before conveyance of each lot, a check payable to the Town of South Windsor must be delivered to the Planning Department. The check will then be deposited into an open space fund in accordance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statutes 8- 25 and 8-25B as amended. A copy of this letter will be filed on the land records so potential buyers will be aware of the obligation on each lot. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning . MRL RE EIVED FOR RECORD: ATE TIME 9 2 S •W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllll TOWN CLERK, SOUTH W,Nos �- Doc ID: 000433610001 Type: LAN Book 1784 Page 184 File# 38 S"N N Sf4 O F Town O-P SoaA VV 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OSOR.0 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 13, 4 Mr. Andy Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates Bonds The Planning and Zoning Commission at its January 6, 2004 meeting released and reduced the following bonds for Appl#00-28P,Wheeler Estates as follows: Landscaping Bonds AMOUNT EDUCTION BALANCE 00-28P,Wheeler Estates SRD $10,000 $10,000 -0- IWA/CC Bonds AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE 00-28P, Wheeler Estates $ 5,000 $ 5,000 -0- Site Bonds _ AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE 00-28P, Wheeler Estates SRD $183,000 $144,000 $39,000 Subdivision Bonds AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE 00-28P, Wheeler Estates $35,000 $400 $34,600** ** maintenance level—expires in one year Advance arrangement should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department of 5644-2511 x 252. Sincerely, � Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission THW/kak Mrs.Michele Lipe 10/06/03 Assistant Director of Planning Town of So. Windsor Ct. 1540 Sullivan Ave. So.Windsor Ct. 06074 � ` OCT - 7 2003 Michele Lipe: SOUTH 4'VINDSGFi PLAIINIIING DENT. As you are probably aware,we have completing the Wheeler Estates Senior Residence. I am requesting the review of all the bonds associated with the senior residence and I would also like to request that eler Rd. be put into maintenance bond. Thank you,Andy S. Kebalo, Member K.F.properties L.L.C. tOW N Sf4 s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f��SOR•C0��4, AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 26, 2004 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letter of Credit A ppl#00-28P Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letters of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION - Wheeler Estates RB $144,000.00 3/14/04 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds we -have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well advance ext , must inone-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment a term for a promptly? Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kak -oo N Sf4 O 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �f�Osox•co TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 May 4, 2004 , Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letter of Credit Appl#00-28P,Wheeler Estates Subdivision The Planning and Zoning Commission is currently holding the following Letters of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates Subdivision RB $35,000.00* 6/29/04 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance. *At the January 6, 2004, Planning & Zoning Commission reduce the Wheeler Estates Subdivision from $35,000.00, to a maintenance level of$34,600.00 extending the term to January 6, 2005 for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly? Very truly yours, PW" /) � Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kak z r BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL DATE : 8 tog APPLICANT NAME tom, F ADDRESS 11 to PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER-t�00 - 2-B 0 Lig A, , 'Z7 se-! SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER ,5 o 0 o It J ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT 10, DO 0 , Qom.. , Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required work has been completed. Avc" NAME DATE Jf 0 j b t/ BY CHECK # ISSUED DATE CI.Docmnenrs and Senmgs•,Ad,imusvaionLocal Senumgs,Temp%BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 082'01.doc �Q*IN SE4 Town O-P SOMA 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f�dSOR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 July 26, 2004 Mr. Andy Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates Bonds Dear Mr. Kebalo: The Planning and Zoning Commission at its July 13, 2004 meeting released the landscaping bond in the amount of$10,000.00 for the above referenced project. Advance arrangement should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department of 5644-2511 x 252. Sincerely, W Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission THW/kak ca TOWn 071e S-OtdA 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soe-ca TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 January 15, 2003 Mr. Walter Kebal 0 K.F. Properties, LLC 125 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits-Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates SRD Rockville Bank $183,000 3/14/03 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds,we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah j "WTI TOWN OIV' SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF ITE CHANGE' 'FOR SIB'& SUBDIVISION GENERAL: p i CHANGE ORDER, CONTACT PERSON+�,t �--�// .`/1" Phone No. 45C-C) !s" Address '-Q, &K 04kv' • 1067�XA7 7•. Site Named M J -r P&Z No. Owner Phone No gn 494 • . #2 Contractor , Lie» L _ Signature of Owner ` • late Signature of Design Engr Date: } � CHANGE: (Describe location an d nature o hange. Include Pour (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) �, _ r ;,. _ w l { Reason for Change: (Why is change required) 46141 APPROVALS (As equired) Dir. Of Planning. �� Date: , Town `Engineer Dater Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department C , Robert C.Schechinger.Jr.ASLA 45 Canal Street,The Turbine House Lwndscape Architect P.O.Box 246,Collinsville,CT 06022-0246 Master Planning Telephone:(860)693- 1025 Urban Design Facsimile:(860)693-4832 ConstruLtion Administration . tJAR, (D : , V 7a SIJ ,1�� 7; M ../�/, lJ'�S I /It ''y��� 4.�_ El I`�!�J- "'i�� "/- 'l�✓f/ 7. � �./ 7 r Q ev 7b . ste,WM T4 t � o a 'S Oawmo cdwv l � f7, -6 70cit SIMOS7VrW775r, serr YIVN Robert C b bin r Jr.ASLA sc tr _ 45 Canal Street,The Turbine House Landscape Architect P,O.Box 246,Collinsville,CT 06022-0246 Master Planning Telephone:(860)693- 1025 Urban Design Facsimile:(860)693-4932 Construction Administration z ?ems /f PaY--Wxt W.S -CO 74-WFI--t7-Is/A�t A f��! dl— • -� 421 A167'11165157'�7-os- 7 � r 1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,CT 06074 PH 644-2511 ext 253 Fax 644-7280 South Windsor Planning Department Fmc To: Biff Schechinger From: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Fax: c�60 6 3 4 3 1— Pages: 1 Phone: Date: 04/02/03 Re: Lot#6,Wheeler Est. CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Biff, Don't make the lot width & depth calculations so complicated. Just use the street frontage on Smith Street for width, the street frontage on Wheeler Rd for depth. Wrap each one around the corner as needed to get the required width&depth. k) 41 �- a FROM JOHNSON LAND DESIGN PHONE NO. 860 693 4832 Apr. 02 2003 11:10AM P1 CD let f � � b� • NO SIG ! \ OUTLET t / � ti A N SNET ' ,.. Nlalz (i l �r SNET r � 1411 ` y 141� i Xebalo IS J * .C-Whcc&r An Upscale Private 25 Unit Adult Condominium Residence of South Windsor, Connecticut Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer RECEIVED South Windsor, CT 06074 JUN 18 2003 Q June 17, 2003 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. RE: Wheeler Estates Appl#00-28P Dear Mr. Doolittle: Please place our project onto maintenance status. Sincerely, A A�� Walter Kebalo Manager Built and Developed by KF Properties, LLC♦ 175 Wheeler Road♦ South Windsor, CT 06074 860-648-4446♦ ,fax• 860-644-2577♦ CTLicense No. 3065 towN af� s F Town a,- s-0-adl Vi• � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 ��Osoit-C TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 February 10, 2003 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 125 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letter of Credits Appl #00-28P, Wheeler Estates We have not as yet received any renewal of the letter of credit in the amount of $183,000.00 which expires on March 14, 2003, as noted in our previous renewal request dated January 15, 2003. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the March 11, 2003, agenda of the Planning&Zoning Commission. Calling of the letter of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal. Very truly your , ichele R. 1pe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah t OpN40 sE7 t� r Tlow OP SC.r�� CW m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 OR.ca AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 April 2, 2003 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letter of Credit Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letters of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates RB $35,000.00 6/29/03 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly? Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah 30-3 \ 25-30-20 2 —30 5 �--� �25-30-11 —30-4 2 —30 6 25-30-21 25-30- 1 5-30— — — 5 30 22 Q' 25-30-9 5-30-2 25—T , \ 5-30—g J 40r / 2 5-30-2 / `-4 25— 3c C 25-30-25 25-3 — p 26 \ JI L \ \ PA JRCE� \ \ 25-30�-3 p�.Q,- �...� 25---30-11 C� 25-30--30 2 --30 5 1 25— 30. 21 / U 2 —30 6 ��' 25--30--'1 25_30-2 25-30-4 5--30--22 5�30— / Q ✓ 25--30-28 r, .5-30-=2 / 25 30•--g PEN co 30--8 �j 25—30—27 / tor \ J y 25,_3D`25 25-30--26 \ \ J -0 o o o x o fA CD CD tor ` Z \ A o tor 1 T J 23 l3 O x 0 o c o m J1 G sn rs �6 PARCEL A �— 25' BUFFER PROPERTY LINE AS 71 PER MAP REF No. 4 , 1 1 ' I • I Ell 0 Ii r i � vil I to p ? 54 0 �X CD M 55.0 3 N 0 = 66.21' dO1S ♦� I �O O L : 49.04' �\ En 2+11 9'4? M 0 P �`0'0'0 ��'V1 DRIVE 3 �� "� R. oo•� N M MgoA00 L P •S' �� .�0 3.67 5�.99• 47 K�B P cD• �' i[ O �asE _ �,� F e 516'27•39�_.. - —-- RM p..Dit IvAlt r,DR. _� ' poo N' 309.49 510 OR M u! 0 P Q x o �No OF TO BE REMOVED S3 07 5 "W Del t o�9;99 F W* /`, M 26 Ton, 4 • P a 2�9SA, N 1 i G�L 2g 2 — PPAARRCCEELL' _ _ . s Sa'SIigw #2 25 X4 e , 6o �es Lolo .52 . � F 33 31 36 =� �NI1 Fb ti 01 -39 m _ o TD 2`' BUFFER �— iC' R.Y. rn P I 1 I 0 \ !o _ r I viI Ae 0 I / p P 0 ;p X W 0 = 2 • 5,4 0 m 55.0 P _ :-' - 66.21 3 P p N I O rio p � 4, +p0 N 2+00�r '9�6 7 _ 3.67' M9 51.99 0 oA00 0 SEMEN +00 © �. 16.27'39' -- ! -- -- ----- - 0i ���R -- — -- 309.49' S10R vDR V TA ON 00 JO 10 \t0 OF �x SDP (TO BE REMOVED p. Q w ! p P 22 21 S3 •07'5 W De t a, F 2 ano _29.42• 4 PARCEL #? 26 S18*51'S8"W V PR e 25 s zW I 3 j 0 F I ,�g / _ 35 I m I0 O m I I a I � i 38�Io /m I r - m - Jvi p LJ lil O U < ' a 25' BUFFER � a / � 42 a I ' 4� 10' R.Y. ` EeAl P 1 ! \ S1B5.'S8"W' 75j. \ N .F A �I S / - ✓ 11�31,5 rLbo I \ II IJ —U I G I I Ln 2ND BEDROOM 2ND BATH + I I I I 1jo 1 8'-0" I 11'- 1 - - CD 0 0 N 3 G -1 ::� SUN �_ DECK 36'-4 1 /2" OPTIONAL F.P. 1 7'-11 1/4" 25'-0" DRIVEWAY 2'-0" 2'-1 1/2" 01 HAT OR - N DINING KITCHENLo WAY 22'-7 3/4'° 15'-3" 1 �o LIVINGROOM Lo 4 I o0 UTILITY 1 CABINE 2'_ 302 LLILCLOS 0 12'-3 1/4" 3'-9" -9" 6'-1" -5 1/2 STAIRS FOYER 0 -- 115'N9 1/4" � i� I I __I - COVERED 01 L LAUNDRY " 00 MASTER B Hi D N u - N.I. N CLOS CLOS O LI `� �' I FOYER_ - 4 -2" _ 1 � i 1 301UNIT I 100.53 HALL in \ 1 00 00 MASTER �, W. .C. BEDROOM �D 8'-10 1/4" 2 -1 1/211 N 14'-8 3/4" 5'-3 1/2" 2'— " 14'-11 1/4" 2ND N RAMP � _ 1 15'-3 3/4" =C�j BEDROOM j� I 0 2ND 0 6' ATH 15'-6 1/4" I 2 5'-11 1 4" 27'-0" 2'-0I I Y/ " 38'-6" c� L 99.4 0 99 i?0 1 3 IG I UP a� 12'-4" FLOOR PLAN REVISION 10'-0" 7'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0" UNIT 302 TYPE F SCALE FIRST FLOOR WHEELER ESTATES LIVING AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 ,310 KEBALO LANE, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT RECEIVED MAY AY .. n I i I 25'-0" N 0 24,-5" w I ATTIC STORAGE - 39'-0" 8'-0" TYPICAL INSULATION 25-0' 6'-0" PER SPECIFICATIONS INSULATED DOOR i I C9'-0'1 ° I "THREE O I SEASONS KITCHEN 1 `° 0j ROOM" N I DINING I N I I � � 8'-0" 11>-8,> I 18'-8 1112„ EXTERI R 11 —f I I EXTERIORAOOR FRENCH DOOR 1 I VAULTED Ow.H.0 _ SHOWER II CEILINGS LAUNDRY 3'-9 11/2" I 4' " 1 -0 LIVINGIRO OM BATH4 IIII I o f 00 BATH � I = I I c i Down I MAIN i N CLOS I ENTRA I 0 CLOS CLOS � � / , gEL� � I HALF COVE N WALL OPTIOhfAL i 00 PORCII 5'-9" 5' HALL I ��� I CLOS 15 -6 7'-2 1 2" 7'',- 1" V-6 BE 0 I LINEN N MASTER 2ND BEDROOM „ i' ; , BEDROOM 0 16 -1 '-7" N 16'-0„ I I I � RATED CLOS 15 -8 1 /2" 0 �. DOOR I Lo 6'-0„ - 61-011 N 111 I I I I OPEN I I DIN I I 07 TOLo MI BELOW - I DUCE WORK SUPPLY AND RETURN GAS O ------- SKY LIGHT FURNACE i� 10'-11" 0 5>-0" o I UTILITY 00 ROOM 27 0" L ^ vUl, ^- „- hl�1 FLOOR PLAID REVISION UNIT 301 TYP E G SCCAA LE SECOND FLOOR c-��� LIVING AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE 1. ,375 TA WHEELER ESTATES fuECEjVFDBALO LANE, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Sst { Y r � JN O CO 1/2" EXTERIOR SHEATHING 1/2" GYPSUM WALLBOARD 2ND FLOOR FLOOR SYSTEMS EXTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALL 2 HOUR RATED f 2 X 4 STUDS 16" ON CENTER 2 X 10 JOIST @ 16" O.C. INTERIOR BEARING WALL INTERIOR - 2 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE I OR EQUAL TJI 2 X 4 WOODSTUDS 16" O.C. • "X" GYPSUM BOARD BRIDGING AS REQUIRED 15/32" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 2 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM EXTERIOR - 2 LAYERS 5 8" TYPE (INTERIOR W/ EXTERIOR GLUE) BOARD EACH SIDE. STAGGER / 19/32" PLYWOOD FINISHED FLOOR JOISTS EACH LAYER EACH SIDE "X" GYPSUM SHEATHING (LONG EDGES T & G) STAGGER JOINTS FACTORY MUTUAL WP360 (9/27/74) EXTERIOR CLADING ATTACHED 2 HOUR RATING THROUGH SHEATING TO STUDS 2 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM ASSN. FILE WP4135 EXTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALL GYPSUM BOARD WITH BRICK VENEER STAGGER JOINTS IN GYPSUM 5/8" RESILIENT FURRING BOARD EACH LAYER EACH SIDE CHANNEL 2 X 4 WOOD STUDS 16" O.C. UL DESIGN L505 INTERIOR - 2 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" 2 HOUR RATING GYPSUM BOARD - STAGGARD JOINTS GYPSUM ASSN. FILE WP4135 FACTORY MUTUAL WP360 EXTERIOR - 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM SHEATHING 1" AIR SPACE 1ST FLOOR NOMINAL 4" BRICK W/ 20 GA. TIES @ EACH STUD, 16" O.C. VERTICALLY UL DES 302 FIREPROOFING DETAIL UNITS 301 AND 302 MAIN CARRYING BEAM 2 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" SHOP DRAWING GYPSUM BOARD ^ 5/8" RESILIENT FURRING 10" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL CHANNEL O FOR CONSTRUCTION BASEMENT COLUMN FIREPROOFING r WHEELER ESTATES 2 HOUR RATING ����,,� 3 LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD SQUARE TUBE COLUMN 4" X 4" X 0.188 THICKNE S zi S m 9 ZO 25 GA. 1 5/8 STEEL STUDS co CROSSSECTION 18 GA. TIE WIRE @ 24" O.C. L� 28 GA. STEEL CORNER BEADS SCALE KEBALO LANE, SOUTH WI DSO CT UL X.528 A� 25-30_ rs-SO-3 Z -30� 5 co��T �"� \,25-30- 11 25-30-20 / � `5-30-31 V� /ZS-30-30 \ 25-30-4 2 -30 6 � 25-30-21 �� 25-30-1 <or / -30- 5-30-22 �P 25-30-2 \� /�I/ nor �/ \ 5_30-g 25-30-9 5-30-2 / O 25-30-28 / �P'+v �/ \\\ 25-30-24 � (� 25-30- PEN SPA CE (REDF/ELO) 25-30-25 ' 40 , �\ �\ �� 25-30-26 SOT 17- 17 . 17- 3 17- 4 � � E'ARCEL ,q 17- 5 17- 6 1C 25' BUFFER V F{tl 200, p3 202 -103 SOUTHp!At►,:rt,n PROPOSED lot } KK D \ 0 0 sl d015 O COMMUNITY HALL z. doffs 4 T vv S A j Tp- -1 505 F 603 ,, / PKAOV �a3 loC�2 25'BUFFER 10' R.1. /J4 yf SIGL�i�ALK N6AJ a2 6.4157'i.-jG? WC i �— 25' BUFFER PROPERrr LINE As ! I PER MAP REF No. 4 1 00 lQ , NI Ae • OAe I mo P m- Z 55.0 3 N Q I 66.21 O L 49.04' dOlS �ta ( C rfs 1+0 p7, N�PV1 DRIVE) �► *aoo, s oo.2t N M 0 I F;7' �' yf.99 Eg�``- •sue. L x 1 " -_1 -- E N,ENS +0 0 IPS 6'27'3 NS- T0' +o- oo F � 20p 49' v 00309. %tA of TO BE REMOM �0 \ 2� 53 '0T5 "W Del t Ton- 8 42. •� 26 2�09 sg, I PARCEL #1 - Tf 2 i a PRG�L 29 - - - � S18:6158-"W, P �t► sq• M � OOk� ®/ 330 a fes SxOo die*6� l'-�ZD�t'i 32 30 34 IN l I i fp W9 , PRO 041 mad I N w Ar-7' = ° P Y J Q)u Q�� A,2 2E' BUFFER a c 40 a� A6L 10' R.Y. A - • I virri Ae �---�— "� o 2 5.4 x CC) P _�' - 6621' \ P ID f ID P 0 L 49.04' d01S D 4 D P \+Oo , N IVE 2+ooy R '9� 3 67' M9 to5� g9 o� 8 P`O LPN •s O M ®��` ��- L 0 EPS ov4l +00 16.2739 r- 6+ I'j i pR �N� osoR- k F '00 ---- ------ — 309.49' S10RP OR M W\N L4. 00 0 c tip` 0 F 2 \W OF �o Ox SHOP P. L v (TO BE R VED ti0 �O�M'\ ►� 'tix S3 '07'S "\N Del t o, • F •� 2� 9' ron,2j 0,9 M1 �TF N 0 •��ss a .,`� -� 6 s TE o 2a - --- -- - .� PARCEL #1 ?---- - 2 �. ..'` � Si8 r -- -- --- - 'S1� V 3 M �� � °°k� Po a�Q sa• ft• 25 <� �" , •J T J ; \ S'`0 R,�e•s�' � ���gas f 0' 360 oC�es I0 a� oo .�20• 1 3� I _ INA J( I ® 3 �� ft. cli I �2 I N rj V I cv yIo J J I O U U 25' BUFFER I < a— AIP I ' -—— 1 C' R.Y. Ee� -- _ —— 1 20 2 7J�,j�B /N,NS N ♦ J �(„E � 1 5�.58�W 356160?038 ENS , \ F ssn�-T���,r_ cAM Ab TOWN OF SOUTH• WINDSOR w: STAFF SITE CHANGE m `. :. FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT,,PERSON Go 1,t ft .5 r M y r•c 6u*v Phone No..a'jl �Cqt�'.�' Address w1hreigr Ga w- $b", +11 54% Site Name Whrrj vr• e.Afti j*_% Raj j5v IV. P&Z No. C Owner a J wwA l f ee e _ y l&A'a Phone No. / . Contractor. £ Siature of Owner Dates_ r SiVgnature of Design Engr. Date a /a lc t } CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include _ Four{ (4) copies orf ,planlprofile. of tChange. Sa w I"� .a e ! �.._5''"fir'1i +i► _ rT' S-f�1�7 hw-4i + r 4 Pre � r ,�` �j bt Rl+t+' Y-AiT'IKtr'k1.Y'r { E 1 N• ` ~ Rean- ' or Changes (Why is change required): P �� �•�,. � t 4 '�.f as eat (a W V +•S a�i'1 v r +t t4 f 14s +n4 per III M r t..Tvu nn APPROVALS: (As a uiredj Dir. Of Plannin1W4LLDates Town Engineer r Date: Dir. of Public or S : s Date: x Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: DA v A�+ ��Iz Z-07-40U$rNOM kr 4L-- r "rv* gun jw e4 White Town. Engineer Yellow Applicant Pink Director of Planning- Goldenrod - Engineering Department ' CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER ' I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief ' - the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported ' assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. ' - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. ' - I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. ' - my engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. ' - my compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a ' stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. - my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. ' - I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. ' - no one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. June 13, 2003 ' Robert G. Stewart, SRA CT Appraiser#RCG.581 Expires April 30,2004 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ROBERT G. STEWART, SRA ICT General Certified Appraiser License RCG.5ti1 STEWART APPRAISAL SERVICES 58 Hartford Turnpike (860)871-8015 Tolland,CT 06084 IEDUCATION Allegheny College,Meadville,PA-B.S.-Economics&Mathematics,1978 FHLMC/FNMA Residential Appraisal Report Seminar-1979 • Course 101 -An Introduction to Appraising Real Property,Society of Real Estate Appraisers-1980 • Course 201 -Principles of Income Property Appraising,Society of Real Estate Appraisers-1980 ( I Adjusting for Financing Differences in Residential Properties Seminar-Society of Real Estate Appraisers-1982 • Course 202-Applied Income Property Valuation,Society of Real Estate Appraisers-1983 • Appraising Individual Condominiums and Preparation of the Project Analysis of FNMA,FHLMC,MGIC Approval Seminar-1983 • "Reading the Land"Seminar-sponsored by the Tolland County Soil&Water Conservation District-1987 • Successfully challenged American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers-Exam 1A-1,Real Estate Appraisal Principles-1988 and Exam 1A-2,Basic Valuation Procedures-1988 • Course 1 B-A&B-Capitalization Theory and Techniques,Part A-American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers-1988 • Course 2-1 -Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation-American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers-1989 Course 2-2-Report Writing and Valuation Analysis-American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers-1989 • Appraising Troubled Properties-CT Chapter of the Appraisal Institute-1992 • Real Estate Fair Housing-University of Connecticut-1992 Rates,Ratios&Reasonableness Seminar-CT Chapter of the Appraisal Institute-1993 • The Lead Paint Dilemma-University of Connecticut-1993 • Standards of Professional Practice,Parts A&B-Appraisal Institute—1993&2000 • Environmental Risk and the Real Estate Appraisal Process-Appraisal Institute-1994 • Employee Relocation Council Appraisal Report Writing-1994 • Dynamics of Office Building Valuation-1995 ' Environmental Concerns with Residential Real Estate-Appraisal Institute-1996 • Highest&Best Use and Market Analysis-Appraisal Institute-1996 ,III Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP)and CT Appraisal Law Update-1997 • 1998 Connecticut Housing Conference by the Appraisal Institute and UCONN Center for Real Estate-1998 • Valuation of Detrimental Conditions in Real Estate Seminar-Appraisal Institute-1998 • Connecticut Commercial Real Estate Conference-University of Connecticut—1998 • Leasing Commercial Real Estate—University of Connecticut—1999 • Appraisal of Contaminated Property—International Association of Assessing Officers—2000 • CT Real Estate Appraisal Law—Appraisal Institute—2001 • Land Valuation Techniques—Appraisal Institute—2001 1is • Appraising Commercial Real Estate in a Litigation Context—Appraisal Institute—2002 t Seminar on New Concepts in 12`h Edition of The Appraisal of Real Estate—Appraisal Institute-2002 , PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Senior Residential Appraiser(SRA)Member-The Appraisal Institute • Appraiser Member-Greater Hartford Board of Realtors • Certified Relocation Professional Designation(CRP)-Employee Relocation Council � I EXPERIENCE 1981 to Present Own and operate Stewart Appraisal Services in Tolland,CT • 1979 to 1981 Employed by Richard H.Barry,Inc.,Manchester,CT,as a staff appraiser,appraising various types of property,both improved and unimproved • 1978-1979 Employed by Norman E.Wright Associates, Putney,VT,as a residential staff appraiser Qualified as an expert witness in Superior and Bankruptcy Court Jan 2002 ' APPRAISAL REPORT K. F. Properties,L.L.C. Kebalo Wheeler Estates Smith Street, South Windsor BY: STEWART APPRAISAL SERVICES TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Town of South Windsor ' 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 FILE NUMBER: 03018 tDATE OF VALUATION: October 30, 2000 PROPERTY TYPE: 10.65 acres of unimproved residential zoned land that was later subdivided into four single family building lots and a 25 unit active adult living ' condominium complex REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS ' 58 HARTFORD TURNPIKE TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT 06084 (860) 87 1-801 5 1-888-22 1-1 292 ' ROBERT G.STEWART,BRA FAX (860) 870-7752 DAVID H.GOWER,SRA ' June 13, 2003 Marcia A. Banach, ' Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue ' South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Kebalo's Wheeler Estates ' 176& 188 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut ' Dear Ms. Banach: As requested I have appraised the above noted property for the purpose of estimating its ' Market Value in fee simple estate. The subject was valued as of October 30, 2000, the day before the subject site was approved creating four single-family building lots and a 25 unit active adult living condominium complex. The function of this appraisal is to ' provide the value of the subject, prior to the subdivision, so the town may calculate the fee in lieu of open space for the Kebalo's Wheeler Estates Subdivision. ' The subject property in its entirety consists of 11.88 acres that was been approved by the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission on October 31, 2000 for a new cul-de- sac road that will provide access to six building lots plus a 25 unit senior citizen ' condominium complex. Two of the building lots were improved with residential dwellings at the time of subdivision and these lots(Lots 1 & 5) are not included in this appraisal. Removing these two lots results in 10.65 acres of unimproved land. As of the ' valuation date, none of the approvals were in place and the subject is valued as if no approvals, or any work to obtain the approvals, are completed. It is noted the subject was inspected on June 2, 2003 as well as on February 15 and March 7, 2001. The 2001 inspections were when I completed an appraisal for financing on the subject and much information from that report was used in this report. ' Page 1 ' In my opinion, the Market Value of the subject, as if not approved and with no design work for the eventual subdivision and site plan approval completed, as of October 30, ' 2000 was: NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ' ($95,000). The following summary appraisal report is offered in support of this conclusion. This report conforms to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP). ' Very truly yours, ' Robert G. Stewart, SRA CT Appraiser#RCG.581 Expires April 30,2004 ' Page 2 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Summary of salient facts and conclusions .......................................... ' Subject photographs.............................................................................................5 Purpose and function of the appraisal...................................................................9 ' Scope of the appraisal ..........................................................................................9 ' Definition of market value and fee simple estate................................................10 Legal description& 3 year sales history.............................................................11 Assessment&taxes ...........................................................................................11 ' Subject deed.......................................................................................................12 Area data and economic conditions....................................................................16 Sitedescription ..................................................................................................18 Sitesketch...................................................................................19 ' Zoning ...............................................................................................................20 Description of improvements.............................................................................20 Highestand best use...........................................................................................21 Valuation of the subject......................................................................................22 ' Final Reconciliation...........................................................................................28 Addendum ' Assumptions and limiting conditions Certificate of appraiser ' Qualifications of appraiser License of appraiser ' Page 3 1 SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS ' LOCATION: 176& 188 Smith Street (As of the valuation date) South Windsor, Connecticut PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 10.65 acres of residential zoned land that ' was later approved for a subdivision creating four single-family building lots and one 25 unit active adult living condominium ' complex ' OWNER OF RECORD: K. F. Properties L.L.C. in part and Walter P. &Lucyna Kebalo in part ' DATE OF INSPECTIONS: Feb. 15 &March 7, 2001 and June 2, 2003 ' DATE OF VALUATION: October 30, 2000 ' ESTATE VALUED: Fee simple ' HIGHEST AND BEST USE: Complete subdivision design and obtain approval for six single family building lots and one condominium site on a new cul-de- sac road ' ESTIMATED MARKETING TIME: 4 to 7 months is ' MARKET VALU E CONCLUSION. As if not approved: .......................$95,000 Page 4 ' Photographs taken February 15,2001 Al ' [010219051 Looping north at subject from existing Wheeler Road and across Smith Street S 1' y ' [010219071 Looping south at the existing Wheeler Road from the subject ' Page 5 ' Photographs taken February 15,2001 I a`�T ' [010219081 Looking west at Smith Street with the subject on the right �� ... IV 1 / ' [01021906] Looking east at Smith Street with the subject on the left Page 6 Photographs taken February 15,2001 - � z y p a: : 1 ' [01021904] Looking west at the new Lot 2 from the to-be-built Wheeler Road 1 I= �V c e.-zt •� 4 d ` 1 [010219031 Looking northeast at the new Lot 4 from the to-be-built Wheeler Road Page 7 ' Photo hs taken February 15 2001 i W { 4 _ r he � . }. ' [010219011 Looking northwest at the condominium site from the area of the to-be-built ' Wheeler Road cul-de-sac r 1 ri. ' [010219021 Looking northeast at the condominium site from the area of the to-be-built cul-de-sac ' Page 8 ' PURPOSE AND FUNCTION OF THE APPRAISAL: ' The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Market Value in fee simple estate of the property known as the Wheeler Estates Subdivision excluding Lots 1 & 5 prior to any approvals. The subject is being valued the day before the Planning&Zoning Approval, ' not recognizing any approvals or design work completed. The two existing building lots that already existed(but were modified by the subdivision)are improved with houses and are excluded so that the subject being appraised consists of 10.65 acres on the north side ' of Smith Street. As of the valuation date? the property was partially owned by K. F. Properties L.L.C. and ' partially by Walter P. and Lucyna Kebalo. The function of this appraisal is to provide a Market Value to the Town of South Windsor ' of the property prior to the subdivision approval so the fee in lieu of open space may be calculated. The status of the land (prior to approval and without design completed) follows State Statute for the calculation in fee in lieu of open space to be paid by a ' developer. ' SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL: The scope of the work involved Robert G. Stewart, SRA reviewing my previous appraisal ' report of the subject valuing it after the approval as of March 7, 2001. This appraisal was completed by Robert G. Stewart for financing purposes and much of the information from that report was used, updating it to reflect the earlier October 30, 2000 valuation ' and to not recognize any subdivision or site plan approval. The site was inspected on February 15 and March 7, 2001 as well as June 2, 2003. Information regarding the subject and the sales considered was obtained from the South Windsor, Vernon and ' Ellington town halls. In addition, the Hartford Multiple Listing Service and the Conn- Comp sales database was used to provide comparable data. This is a summary appraisal report summarizing the work completed with additional information being retained in my files. The appraiser, Robert G. Stewart, SRA, is considered competent to appraise the subject ' based on my education and experience appraising the subject type property. Robert G. Stewart holds a Connecticut Certified General Appraiser License(RCG.581 expiration ' April 30, 2004). Copies of my qualifications and current Connecticut appraisal license are in the addendum of this report. This report is completed in compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices (USPAP). i Page 9 ' DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: ' As defined in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(2000 Edition). "The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the ' passing of title from a seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; ' 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; ' 4. payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by ' special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale." DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE: As defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Third Edition, copyright 1993, by the Appraisal Institute. ' "Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police ' power, and escheat". ' Page 10 ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION& 3 YEAR SALES HISTORY: ' As of the valuation date, the subject property was owned by two different entities that are related. The western and northern portion of the site containing 9.39 acres, including the dwelling on Lot 1 that is not being included in this appraisal,was owned by K.F. Properties L.L.C. Title was obtained via a Quit Claim Deed from Paul Kebalo and Helen Kebalo on December 29, 1999 for $320,000. This deed is recorded in the South Windsor Land Records in Volume 1124, Page 130. It is to be noted that these parties are related and the price does not necessarily reflect the market value at that time. The southeastern 2.49 acres of the entire subject, including Lot 5, which is not included ' in this appraisal, was owned by Walter P. Kebalo and Lucyna Kebalo. They obtained title to the property via a Warrantee from Bohdan Maksymiuk on July 25, 1985 for $100,000. This deed is recorded in the South Windsor Land Records in Volume 410, ' Page 585. A copy of both deeds is on the following four pages. None of the subject, including the to-be-created building lots or condominium units, was ' offered for sale or under contract to be purchased as of the valuation date. ASSESSMENT& TAXES: ' The Assessor identifies the subject as Map 17, Lots 1 &2. The 1999 Grand List assessment is of all the land prior to the subdivision approval plus the two houses known ' as 176 and 188 Smith Street. The assessment of the two properties include the improvements as well as the to-be created lots 1 & 5, so the assessment of only the subject unimproved land is not available. Page 11 s VOL. 1124 PAGE 13 0 STATUTORY FORM QUIT-CLAIM DEED 8031 ' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: We,PAUL KEBALO and HELEN KEBALO,both of the Town of South Windsor,County o° Hanford and State of Conncd.icut,(Hereinafter referred to as the"Grantors"),for THREE ' HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND AND NO/100's(S320,000.00)DOLLARS,grant to K.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.,of die Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,(Hereinafter referred to as the"Grantee'j,with QUIT-CLAIM COVENANTS,all our interest in and to the following described real property: A certain piece or parcel of land,%%ith the buildings and improvements thereon,situated in the ' To%%n of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut,containing thirteen(13) acres more or less,and more particularly bounded and described as follows: NORTHERLY and ' EASTERLY: By land one time of William Thresher and Charles Thresher,and later now or formerly of Douglas N.Grant: EASTERLY: By land now or formerly of Anna French; SOUTHERLY: By Smith Street.and WESTERLY: By land one time of George A.Smith,and later now or formerly of Hartman Tobacco Company. Said premises are also sometimes kno%%n as No 176 Smith Street,South Windsor,Connecticut. Excepting therefrom a certain piece or parcel of land,containing 2.5 acres,more or less• con eyed by Warranty Deed of Walter Wasylcnko and Eugenia Waslenko,ct al to Bohdam Nfaks%miuk and Olga%Iaks%miuk dated June 28, 1914 and recorded in Volume 181 at page 327 of die South Windsor Land Records. ' CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED r� CIV / STATE S I LOCAL 111 No. TOWN CLERK Of Soon+WwDSOR ' Page 12 ' VOL. 1 124PAGE 131 Signed this 29"day of December. 1999. ' Witnessed by: PAUL KEBALO HELEN KEBALO STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ' ) ss.: South Windsor December 29, 1999 May COUNTY OF HARTFORD ' Personally appeared,PAUL KEBALO and HELEN KEBALO,signers of the foregoing y instrument and acknoicledged the same to be their free act and deed,before me. I A�4'�. ' Daniel E.Lynch,Esq. Commissioner of the Superior Court gimnwc's Address: 176 Smith Street South Windsor,CT 06074 DEC 3 G.i999 PM. -, ,r l►1� _[30 'TOWN CLERK Page 13 T VLUUJe 41V Page No 585 WARRANTEE DEED(Survivorship) I14SS mil CW-Wwl Gnr Mak S.O.'b.' �.� Eau Hudord.Con",ctka 06108 ' To all People to whom these Presents shall come, Greetings 31 Z7 KNOW YE, THAT I, BOHDAN MAKSYMIUK, of the Town of South Windsor, County of ' Hartford and State of Connecticut for the consideration of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND and 00/100ths ($100,000.00) DOLLARS received to my full satisfaction of WALTER P. KEBALO and LUCYNA KEBALO, both of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut ' do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said WALTER P. KEBALO and LUCYNA KEBALO and the survivor of them, and the heirs and assigns of the survivor of them forever a certain ' piece or parcel of land, situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and , State of Connecticut, being located on the northerly aide of Smith Street which may be more particularly described as follows, to wit: ' Commencing at a merestone in the northerly line of Smith Street, which said merestone is located in the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Anna French; thence in a southwesterly direction along the northerly line of Smith Street, a distance of One Hundred Eighty-one and Seventy-two One-hundredths (181.72) feet to a point at other land of this Grantor; thence turning northeasterly and forming an interior angle with the last named course of 74' 22' 00", a distance of Six Hundred Forty-six and Seventy-seven One-hundredths (646.77) feet to a point at other land of this Grantor; thence turning In a southeasterly direction and forming an interior angle with the last named course of 90% a distance of One Hundred Seventy-five (175) feet to a point at land now or formerly of Anna French; thence turning in a southwesterly direction and forming an interior angle with the last named course of 90% a distance of Five Hundred Ninety-seven and Eighty One-hundredths (597.80) feet to the merestone which said point marks the point and place of beginning. Said premises are conveyed subject to the following: ' 1. Building, building line, zoning restrictions and other municipal ordinances of the Town of South Windsor. ' 2. Taxes on the List of October 1, 1984. �rt - ' $1119 "`' Conveyance T x�ecelved �Conveyanc Ta r Celved To r. Clerk of South Wirresor ` nW • Clerk of Sout Aont, o.m h Wl�sor Clerk Annt. Town Clerk r i 0 Page 14 Volume 410 Page No 586 I � .I • -TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appur. { tcnances thereof, unto them the said grantees and the survivor of them, and the heirs and I assigns of the survivor of them forever,and to their own proper use and bchoof.And also, I (' the said grantor do for my scl f. my heirs,executors, 3 administrators,and assigns covenant with the said grantees, their survivor and such survivor's :; heirs and assigns, that at and until the cnscaling of these presents, I ' I am well seised of the premises,as a good indefeasible estate in FEE SIMPLE; and have a good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written;and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever,except as is above written. ;i AND FURTHERMORE, I the said grantor do by these presents I I bind my sel f and my heirs and assigns forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to them the said grantees and to the survivor of them and to such survivor's heirs and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as is above written. I ) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I. BOHDAN MAKSYMIUK, II ha ve hereunto set my hand this 25th day of July 19 85 SiZ..d—d D.iiwnd L.IA.pn$. of(ryp.-Prim w.n.►.i.w#-A wrrnEss P C� o' �t(Apork, SYAlOR.. .............. II •CCr�oc.r�... ....................................... I ....................................... ....................................... STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ) ( I COUNTYOF HARTFORD l as. Manchester July 25 1985 Personally Appeared BOHDAN W. MAKSYMIUK I! Signer(s)of the foregoing Insu iment, and acknowledged the same to be his ' free act and deed, before me. / ,� II �n'�A(ciO.II..................... I� Conn U.imnofSrp.6k Corn STATE OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF as. 19 I ! Personally Appeared. as aforesaid,Signer of the foregoing Instrument,and I acknowledged the same to be free act and deed as such i and the free act and deed of said corporation/partnership,before me. �I Granrees'Address: ....................................... if 176 Smith Street �I '• • • • •••••••••••••,South Windsor. CT 06074 d JUL 251985 I ,00ivedl for Reoord I An.vt. in•rn �.lnrk 4 I IPage 15 ' and senior housing complex, a new senior housing complex known as Pleasant Meadow is seeking approval. This complex is located on the north side of Pleasant Valley Road ' one-third of a mile west of Wheeler Road. That complex consists of 20 units which will be priced from $159,900 to $169,900 depending on the model. Numerous extras and upgrades are available which will increase the prices. ' As of October 30, 2000, the general economy had been very strong in South Windsor increasing since 1996 and 1997 following an 8 to 9 year economic downturn when real ' estate values decreased significantly. Values in South Windsor did not decline as much as in surrounding towns with the town being one of the most desirable residential communities east of the river. The demand for new construction, as well as for senior ' citizen housing, was very strong in South Windsor over the few years before the valuation date. In South Windsor as of October 2000, there were three senior citizen housing complexes developed over the previous six years. Each of those complexes sold out very quickly. As of the valuation date, two proposed active adult living complexes (including the subject)were being proposed. In addition, a new complex with 74 units in Vernon,just east of the northeast corner of South Windsu was started in the summer of ' 2000 and were being contracted quickly. This comple ha rice increases, which the market has accepted and sales continued to be strong. Page 17 ' SITE DESCRIPTION: As of October 30. 2000 ' The subject in its entirety consists of 11.88 acres with 455.10 feet on the north side of Smith Street. The basically rectangular shaped site has an average depth of 1,170 feet. As noted, the approved Lot 1 and Lot 5 are not included in this appraisal. Lot 1 contains t .726 acre and Lot 5 contains .509 acre. The subject as appraised, consists of a total of 10.65 acres with 312.87 feet on the north ' side of Smith Street. A sketch of the site is on the following page. With the omission of these two lots,the parcel is irregularly shaped being 450 feet wide and 1,160 feet deep, with a 170 x 170 foot rectangle cut out of the southwest corner and on the east side, ' starting 145 feet in from Smith Street, a 110 x 200 foot rectangle is eliminated. The site slopes down gradually, but continually, a total of 25 feet over the front 900 feet ' (2.8% slope). Starting approximately 180 feet from the rear line, the land slopes down quicker 10 to 12 feet to a ravine that also slopes down to the northwest with a brook flowing through it. The site is almost entirely open land although the extreme northern ' portion is lightly treed and brush. Utilities that will service the site consist of public water, sewer, gas, electricity, telephone ' and cable television. All of these utilities are presently available along Smith Street. In addition, there is a sewer line near the rear northwest corner of the subject in Drake ' Circle. Page 18 Z� r vc - o k 00 .6or _ �_,� � �� •err � , l i ;' -oc - 6 ' / _ 00 9p r I l / � G -0c-�^ -o' - l - ' ZONING: ' The entire subject site is zoned Residential A-20. Permitted uses in this zone consist of one family dwellings, housing for the elderly, senior residence development, and some agriculture. The minimum lot size for a single family building lot is 20,000 square feet ' (46 acre)with a 100 foot lot width and depth of 150 feet. Numerous special requirements apply for a senior residence development. ' As noted, on October 31, 2000 the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission approved the subdivision of Wheeler Estates as well as a Special Exception and Site Plan Approval for 25 age restricted condominium units on Parcel A on the northern end of the ' site. This appraisal values the subject as of the day before this approval and does not recognize the mapping, soil testing or work completed to obtain this approval. ' According to FEMA Map Number 090036 0010 D, dated February 23, 2001, none of the subject is located in a flood hazard zone. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ' As of October 30, 2000 there was a barn and greenhouse on the property, which the later Planning&Zoning Approval required be removed. These were removed prior to March ' of 2001 and as they had no contributory value, are not described and have no contributory value. I ' ' Page 20 ' HIGHEST AND BEST USE: ' As defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Third Edition, copyright 1993, by the Appraisal Institute. ' "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal ' permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum profitability." The highest and best use of the subject site, as if vacant, is for a residential subdivision ' development in conformance with zoning. ' Page 21 ' VALUATION OF THE SUBJECT: ' To value the subject property, the three professionally accepted approaches to value were considered. The Sales Comparison Approach involves a comparison of comparable properties that have sold in the open competitive market to the property being appraised. ' In developing the Cost Approach, the land is valued as if vacant;this value is then combined with the reproduction cost new of the improvements less depreciation taking into consideration physical deterioration and functional and economic obsolescence. The Income Capitalization Approach gives consideration to the anticipated net income from rental of the property and to the capitalization of this income;this process is the capitalization of income in accordance with returns on similar type properties or ' investments of similar risk to determine the amount at which ownership would be justified by a prudent investor. ' The subject is valued as it existed on October 30, 2000, which is unapproved and unimproved land that obtained Planning&Zoning Commission approval on the next day. As noted, following the State Statutes, the subject is valued as of the day before the ' approval and does not recognize the approval or any of the design work needed to obtain the approval. It is to be noted the eventual design of the subdivision is recognized, but not the cost of that work. As the subject is unimproved land, only the Sales Comparison ' Approach was considered applicable and developed to value the subject. The Sales Comparison Approach was developed using two methods. The first is the Direct Comparison Method and the second is the Subdivision Development Method. The Direct Comparison Method compares similar properties that have sold to the subject and adjust them for time, location and differing characteristics. My search of the land records ' located only one recent sale of a comparable unsubdivided, but subdividable, parcel of land in South Windsor. The following is an outline of the only truly comparable sale located. It is two abutting parcels containing 7.39 acres. The buyer then reconfigured the lot lines creating a .92 acre and a 6.47 acre building lot. 460 Strong Road ' Sold October 27, 1999 for $85,000 Grantor: First Federal Savings&Loan of East Hartford ' Grantee: Donald J. &Laura M. Mitchell Recorded: Volume 1113, Page 279 Description: Two abutting lots of record containing 7.39 acres. The sites have a ' total of 375.39 feet and are zoned Rural Residence. The site goes back 200 feet and jogs to one side 600 feet. The buyers later resubdivided the land using the existing road frontage and then sold one building lot. Financing was provided by the seller with a $65,000 note at 8.5%. The seller obtained the subject via foreclosure. Adjusting this sale for time, location and differing physical characteristics indicates a ' value of the subject of$100,000. ' Page 22 ' The Subdivision Development Method looks at the property as a buyer/developer would. That is,by looking at the value of the eventual building lots (and the condominium site) ' that can be created following its highest and best use and then deducting the costs to create those lots. By doing this the"as is" market value is indicated. The costs to do the subdivision and create the building lots are broken down to three categories. The first is ' the design and approval expenses. These were estimated based on discussions with area developers, surveying and engineering firms, and the subject developer. The second expense is the cost of the required public improvements. These were estimated using the ' Marshall Valuation Cost Service, discussions with area contractors and developers, and reviewing the subject developer's bids/quotes that he obtained in early 2001 (just after the valuation date). The last expense is known as an entrepreneurial return. This is the ' return to the buyer/developer for time, risks, carrying costs, marketing expenses, cost overruns, etc. This was estimated based on my analysis of sales of subdivided or subdividable parcels and discussions with area developers. The first step in the Subdivision Development Method is to value the ultimate income. In the subject case, there are four residential building lots ranging in size from .47 to .73 acre plus a 7.6 acre parcel approved for a 25 unit senior citizen condominium complex that were later approved. First the detached single family building lots were valued. This was done by valuing a typical building lot(Lot 4 containing .52 acre) on a Land ' Appraisal Report. With this value, the other three lots were valued by doing a comparison to Lot 4 and adjusting for differences. Second, the condominium site was valued by comparing recent sales and current listings to the subject site. ' On the following page is a Land Appraisal Report valuing Lot 4 as approved. 1 1 Page 23 LAND APPRAISAL REPORT mmarl Appraisal Report Fie No.03018 Borrower K.F.Properties.L.L.C. Census Tract 4875.00 Map Reference SMSA#3280 Property Address Lot 4 Wheeler Road ' City South Windsor County Hartford State CT Zip Code 06074 Legal Description Lot 4 Wheeler Estates Subdivision Sale Price$TBD Date of Sale 10-30-2000 Loan Term yrs. Property Rights Appraised ®Fee El ❑Leasehold De Minimis PUD Actual Real Estate Tares$ (yr) Lowy charges to be paid by seller$ Other sales concessions ' Lender/Client Town of South Windsor Address Occupant Appraiser Robert G.Stewart,SRA Instructions to Appraiser Appraise as if ready to be developed w/road built Location ❑Urban ®Suburban ❑Rural Good Avg. Fair Poor Built Up M Over 75% ❑25%to 75% ❑Under 25% Employment Stability ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ' Growth Rate ❑Fully Dev. ®Rapid ❑Study ❑Sicw Convenience to Employment ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Property Values ®Increasing ❑Stable ❑Declining Convenience to Shopping ® ❑ ❑ ❑ DemmOuppty ®Shortage ❑In Balance ❑Oversupply Convenience to Schools ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Marketing Time ®Under 3 Mos. ❑4.6 Mos. ❑Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Pudic Transportation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Present Land Use 20%1 Family%2-4 Family %Apts. 65%Condo %Commercial Recreational Facilities ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ' %Indushial%Vacant 15% Adequacy of Utilities ® ❑ El Change In Present Land Use ❑Not Likely ®Likely(*) ❑Taking Place(") Property Cornpadblfty ❑ ® ❑ ❑ (*)From vacant To condominium Protection from Detriments!Conditions ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Predominant Occupancy ®Owner ❑Tenant %Vacant Police and Rre Protection ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ' Single Family Price Range $ 165,000 tD$250,000 Predominant Value$ 200,000 General Appearance of Properties ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Single Family Age 2 yrs.to 100 yrs. Predominant Age 10 yrs. Appeal to Market ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Comments Including those facture,favorable or unfavorable,affeciMg marketability(e.g.pudic parks,schools,view,noise): See Area Data earlier in report. ' Dimensions 109.11 x 208.44 x 1 O9.00 x 2O3.61 = .52 acre Sq.FL or Acres El Comer Lot Zoning dassilicall n Residential A-20 Present Improvements ®do ❑do not conform to zoning regulations Highest and best use ®Present use ❑Other specify Public Other(Describe) OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Topo basically level Elw. ® Street Access ®Public ❑Privets Size Tcal Gas ® Surface macadam Shape basically rectangular ' Water ® Maintenance ®Public ❑Private View residential San.Sewer ® ®Storm Sewer ®Curb/Gutier Drainage appears adequate ® Underground Elect.&Tel. ®Sidewalk ®Street Lights I Is ere property looted In a HUD Identified Special Rood Hazard Area? ®No❑Yea Camrents(favorable or unfavorable Including any apparent adverse easements,encroachnents,or other adverse cond8ans): FEMA Zone X,MaD date: February 23 2001 Map No.090036 0010 D The undersigned has racked three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis.The description includes a dollar adjustment reflecting market reaction to those hems of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties.If a significant hem in the comparable property Is superior to or more favorable than the subject property,a minus(-)adjustment Is made thus reducing the Indicated value of subject;If a significant hem In the comparable is gderior m or less ' favorable than the subject property,a plus(+)adjustment is made thus increasing the indicated value of the subject. ITEM I SUBJECT PROPERTY COMPARABLE NO.1 COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3 Address Lot 4 Wheeler Road 56 Bancroft Lane 6 Evan's Crossing 460 Strong Road South Windsor South Windsor South Windsor South Windsor ' PMAMKY to Subject SIM11110M 3.25 miles+/-N rthwest 3 miles+/-Northeast 2.5 miles+/-N rthwest Sales Price TBD 70,000 60 000 48.000 Price Data Source town ree&inspection town records& nsDection town records MLS&Ins ion town records&ins ion Date of Sale and DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +- Ad SL DESCRIPTION +- Ad lust DESCRIPTION +- Ad ust ' Thrre Adjustment 10 30-2000 closed 4 4 00 +3 500 closed 8-3-00 +1 500 closed 6-28-00 +1 500 Location residential residential residential-traffic +5 000 residential-inferior +20 000 S 52 acre/avere 46 acre/average .54 acre/average .92 acre/average -1 500 To hastinaliv level basically level gentle rise 0 aentle rollin 0 ' I'mirtage 109.11 feet 133.70 feet 145.99+138.83 ft +3 500 175.37 feet 0 Wetlands none none none none Utilities all all all all Sales or Financing $215,000 FIX no financing no financing Concessions 30 vr 0 recorded recorded ' Net Ad. U+ LJ- 3 500 + - 10 000 + - 20.000 Indicated Value OUR of Subject 73.500 Em 1 1 68.000 Comments on Market Data Volume 1136 Page 5 Volume 1156 Page 122 Volume 1150 Page 32 ' Due to limited recent sales of buildinq lots in the subject area and in South Windsor three sales located over one mile from the subject Including one that is lust over six months old were considered. The time adlustmerd reflects the increase in value since each comparable sold. Comments and Conditions of Appialsal: Sale 2 was adjusted for being on the comer of busy Avery Street as well as for being a less usable comer lot under frorrta e. Sale 3 was adjusted up 20%for its much inferior location and its larger size. All three comparables were relied on with the median indicated value concluded. The subject lot is valued as if ready to be developed with Wheeler Road built. ' Final Reroncliation: The Market Data Analysis was totally relied on to value the subject. r-t7S Man THE MARKET VALUE,AS DIFINIU,OF SVBJWT FrWrfrrTY AU or October 30 20 00 to be$ 70,000 �4 —I— - 24 - Robert G.Stewart.SRA El Did ❑Did Not Physically Inspect Property A nicer s Review A reiser k icable ' Kh] Stewart Appraisal Services(860)871-8015 Form LND—'TOTAL for Winkbwe appraisal software by a la mode,inc.—14OD-ALAMODE ' All four new lots are similar in size to Lot 4. That is they are .47 acre, .48 acre and .73 acres while Lot 4 is .52 acre. The largest lot also fronts on Smith Street and the traffic on ' Smith Street offsets the value of its larger size. All the lots are considered to be equal in value when the road is completed. Therefore, the value of each lot as ready to be developed is $70,000. ' Next the 7.6 acres site at the end of Wheeler Road that was eventually approved for 25 senior citizen condominium units was valued. This was done by comparing recent sales ' of similarly approved sites to the subject. A search was conducted to located sales and current listings of condominium complex sites. The sales located are outlined below. Sale 1 is a larger complex in Vernon just over the South Windsor town line four miles northeast of the subject that the buyer is developing with 74 senior citizen detached and attached Ranch style units. Sale 2 is the smaller 20 unit complex less than one mile southwest of the subject on Pleasant Valley Road. Due to limited sales, a current listing ' of a site in Vernon five miles northeast of the subject that is approved for 18 senior citizen units was considered. No improvements on the site have started. Sale 1 - Quail Hollow Gerber Place, Vernon ' Sold July 3, 2000 for$540,000 Unit Price: $7,297 per unit Grantor: Edwin W. Gerber ' Grantee: Quail Hollow Associates, LLC Recorded: Volume 1260, Page 276 Description: A total of 20.142 acres of unimproved land with 62.01 feet ' of road frontage on a new cul-de-sac road built by the seller. The open field has gentle sloping topography with shallow red rock. Prior to the purchase the buyer obtained, and paid for, approval to built 74 senior citizen housing condominium units plus a community ' clubhouse. The units consist of all Ranch style units of which 22 are detached free- standing units and 52 are attached in either duplex or fourplex buildings. All utilities are available to the project at the road frontage. ' Financingwas provided b Webster Bank with a$745 000 Revolving Line of Credit for P Y g ' 3 years with an adjustable rate at prime plus 1% and interest only payments. Webster Bank also provided a Second Revolving Loan for$1,100,000 available to build the condominium units. The seller provided a third mortgage for$465,000 for 3 years with a fixed 7%rate. This financing is not considered to have impacted the purchase price. ' Page 25 ' Sale 2- Pleasant Meadows 1140 Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor Sold April 26, 2000 for$170,000* Unit Price: $8,500 per unit Grantor: Anthony D. Russo ' Grantee: South Windsor Estates, LLC Recorded: Volume 1139, Page 197 Description: A 3.10 acre site in southern South Windsor just west of the ' Buckland Mall Regional Shopping area and in an area with numerous condominium complexes. The open site is approved for 20 units which the buyers designed, obtained and paid for. There are six one-story units and fourteen two-story units in three ' buildings. *The purchase price was actually$110,000 to Anthony D. Russo and $60,000 to Burr ' Meadow Society, Inc. The $60,000 purchase was a storm water and sewer easement and also requires a$240 per unit annual fee starting on May 1, 2001. This raises the purchase price slightly higher. Financing was provided by the Savings Bank of Rockville with a$650,000 construction note for two years. The rate is adjustable at prime plus 1.5%. Listing 1 - The Village at Ferguson Road ' 20 Whitney Ferguson Road, Vernon Currently listed for$275,000 Unit Price: $15,278 per unit Grantor: Rya Corporation Description: A 9.123 acre site on the north side of Whitney Ferguson Road by an exit of 1-84. The wooded site is approved for 18 units of which there are 8 ' detached units and 5 two-unit buildings. Each unit is a two story townhouse with an attached two car garage. The site is serviced by all utilities and is to be extensively landscaped. There are no common buildings and the units start quickly once on the site. ' No seller financing or concessions are offered. ' These comparables were compared to the subject and adjusted for time, location and differing physical characteristics. Specifically, both sales were adjusted up for time to reflect the increase in value since each sold. The listing was not adjusted rather used to ' indicate a list price or ceiling of value for the subject. Sale 1 was adjusted up for being in lower priced Vernon, for being much larger, and for the buyer paying for and obtaining all approvals. Sale 2 was adjusted up for its more traffic location, its smaller lot size and ' for the buyer paying for and obtaining all approvals. The listing was adjusted up for location as it is in lower priced Vernon being very close to I-84 and down for land size. Based on my analysis of these comparables, the subject site has an indicated unit value as approved of$14,750 per unit or$368,750, rounded to $370,000. ' Page 26 Next the expenses to create the building lots and condominium site were estimated. As valued, no subdivision or approval work(or the expense of this)was completed. Based on discussions with area developers, area surveyors, and the subject developer, this work is estimated to cost $85,000 to $100,000 with$90,000 used. The public improvements consist of a road, curb, sidewalks and utilities. The cost of this work was estimated using ' the Marshall& Swift Cost Manual, discussions with area road contractors and developers, and the quotes obtained by the subject owner after the subdivision approval. The proposed road will be 600 feet long to the end of the cul-de-sac and is estimated to ' cost $250.00 per linear foot. However the added costs of sewers and storm water drainage and the detention basin at the north end of the site increases this cost to $400.00 per linear foot or$240,000. This cost includes the sidewalks, lighting and utilities. ' The next major expense category is the entrepreneurial expense. This is estimated at a percentage of the to be created lot value and reflects the costs to the buyer/developer ' (carrying costs, marketing expenses, legal, accounting, etc.). It also includes a return to the buyer/developer for his risks and time, including the risk of obtaining approval for all of the planned lots as this valuation is prior to the approval that was eventually obtained. ' Based on my analysis of sales of approved and not approved subdivisions and condominium sites and discussions with area developers, the entrepreneurial return is estimated to be 35%. ' The following are the mathematical calculations to complete the Subdivision Development Method using the above noted factors. ' Income: 4 building lots @ $70,000 each $280,000 ' 7.6 acre condominium site 370,000 Total Potential Income $650,000 Expenses: Design and approval work 90,000 Wheeler Road and public improvements 240,000 Entrepreneurial Return(35%) 227,500 ' Total Expenses 557,500 ' Indicated As Is Land Value $92,500 Neither the Cost Approach nor Income Capitalization Approach were considered applicable to value the subject land in its as is state. That is, neither approach reflects the ' thinking of a buyer or seller of unimproved land, be it approved for a subdivision or not. ' Page 27 ' FINAL RECONCILIATION: Strictly the Sales Comparison Approach was developed to value the subject land prior to the subdivision approval and not recognizing the approval work completed. That is, as valued, the subject is a 10.65 acre parcel that has a highest and best use of subdividing ' into four new single family building lots and a condominium site on a new road, however no approvals are in place. It is to be noted Lots 1 & 5 of the eventual subdivision will be accessed from the new Wheeler Road but they, and the houses on them, were not ' included in this valuation. Both the Direct Comparison and the Subdivision Development Method were used to value the subject. Sales of subdividable land were very limited and the Subdivision Development Method truly reflects the thinking of a buyer of subdividable land. That is, looking at the value of the ultimately created building lots and condominium site and ' deducting the costs to create those lots. Good sales data was available to value the building lots and the condominium site. The design work, the public improvement costs, and the entrepreneurial return were also reliably indicated. As outlined the ' entrepreneurial return reflects the risk of obtaining approval. In my opinion, the Market Value, as defined, of the subject, as unimproved land without ' any subdivision approval in place or designed, as of October 30, 2000 was: NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($95,000). Robert G. Stewart, SRA CT Appraiser#RCG.581 Expires April 30,2004 II Page 28 A z w A A ' ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS tThis appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions: 1. The legal description furnished to me is assumed to be correct. ' 2. I assume no responsibility for matters legal in character, nor do I render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good. All existing liens and encumbrances ' have been disregarded and the property is appraised as though free and clear and under responsible ownership. ' 3. Sketches in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property and no land survey was made by the appraiser. ' 4. The information contained in this report is not guaranteed, but it was gathered from reliable sources which are believed to be accurate. ' 5. This report is not to be reproduced in part or as a whole without the prior written consent of the appraiser. ' 6. The appraiser, by reason of this appraisal, is not required to give testimony or attendance in court, with reference to the property appraised, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. ' 7. Any distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of land utilization. The separate ' valuation for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. ' &. Disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report is governed by the by-laws and regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report(especially any conclusion as to value, the identity of the appraisers or firm with ' which they are connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news ' media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent and approval of the appraisers so designated in this report. ' 9. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)became effective January 26, 1992. I have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It ' is possible that a compliance survey of the property together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA could reveal the property is not in compliance with one or more of the of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect ' upon the value of the property. Since I have no direct evidence relating to this issue, I did not consider possible noncompliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. SSW N Sf4 O a 9 w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �cr�oSOR,co�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 April 18, 2003 Mr.Walter Kebalo K.F Properties, LLC 175 Wheeler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 - ---- - - Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits -Appl#00-28P,Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates SBR gk Z6I 00 6/29/03 61dU In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah TOWN 'OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION o3 ry GENERAL:CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON ,Ar&Tem- VlaaALO Phone No. &q q+51 Z Y Address 175' WHME)L WDAQ W tN19fed. Site Name WHEELER v5;TPFTe;65 P&Z No. 50 Owner K F7 7 1'•tJPE"11—E� L,L C Phone No. 64/41-5124 Contractor AAL Signature of Owner Date: /g Signature of Design Engr. Dates CHANGE: (Describe location, and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) Z--oG$T/Dyo* RIGIOTe- 4111yt Pj4 s i1,47'1-As6 Ar pis. t': 6"WAV4 e aMA0W y Sly#As Et /. h't 1A1A147.r A 3)Vp 514AAC 42(C iWr TjsV IWAUC SM04 S 01.1 4T Tye` Ems € To 7-h►,e Pvsj./c Ra ro. 2, £t.)d;►.AWe Tr1�e ''Ao 07 4AoJr&W"f0AK 9., 4441 1WI Th►t 11AVE *V" S141JS i Y, Au/rJ 1N� 70I4' y 1 WI*4, ` S7',01AF.0 Reason for Change: (Why is change required) _A)P'W-C A0,4014y► C11rAA#4 s' /5 NOT Nf`'E4,0'AAY APt 70 44tt 10,ft IAA B�Ny 1.��, �"ff� �9vrrt�gE l�K �tdu�c7�t�UT /S LF S APPROVALS: (As Re uired) Dir. Of Planning l� �-. - Date: Town Engineer ) Date: -r/••+ 3 tl' Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS ,. /�S:<.i,�/ nl,f SS�.��.1./ff 1�?4(n.�� )t r ,•F.^ hrs /r�.., a� y S tiij �a;.t,fr �L�ii� One ;.A)o 1, fCWG Ll - f f.l� �. s^ �` �� +{>f � i:� .,S ;y. l L�'f �Cfl S `1•, ti, ih,v..n., White Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department -77 f - Q o F ,,L,r -4 ems. 3 . ` o t , = 1t r G 3ol - . -.." . :., :..•. • _. - .. '. -: . -__.:_ ',- 1. "_ [may- 1ii9 G i ... .. -.. ...._- -.- a a... ._ ._ :. ...... _-n. a •.X. .:. ., vim.. ... - _ +00 - q 4rt. v K E �, ;, ` � �����, ' `' - � �- • •�'ti PVT E_ RIV 2+0 At x NY Rod 4, IV ICY N r e u ff 7Q I Q pA, o� ' -V.�S � .'r?� - -_ -Q ♦ Rid: V :.R r�9 2, / - o / © Soe o INSTA .I. STOP BAR AND SIGH }� € : 04 PARCEL 29 INSTALL N4 OUTLET SIGN N% O : 330,844 sq. ft. INSTALL 15 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN 6Q3 � 7.so ����5 (� END BtT. CUR'Q �� �, �� 1 © soj 33 32 E` MOUNTABLE CURB WITHIN LIMITSs�3, iw r 3t OF ACCESS DRIVE / / 34 ` `` �� 35 4` CONC. WALK � � �, © 6o1 k RAMP (TYP.) g. se,� �� 60e i 36 WN � d0 NOT EN TER,�- SIGN \ � . ONE WAS' SIGN HANDICAP PARKING SPACE F� , �-, Two 8' 45• e ` os 37 A ' .? THRUS OCKS 1v 40 4' WIDE STRIPED PEDESTRIAN XfNG. 63s66pp38 \` s - A 1rt TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: //t� CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON �j��,�C �t`"p#on�No. Addre s s , O�G S(�/�. C 4 Z�-- Site Name hLhke� r4f FS P&Z No. QO2 Own er '�jll>pT/��S , L•/-C" Phone No. Contractor LAG C Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Engr Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of cha Include --�-* �Z Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) !/ 2 / v Reason for Change: (Why is change required) !�l�Z�'� !-�5�" Y�'�Ti�TYwh�-r��=.�Ji�✓��wc��zt�,�,4,�ic�� APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: APPLICANT NAME Pm21wb cf L L C- ADDRESS /7 0 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT SUBDIVISION 3 '_ Lot 4? Fee i n P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBEI P IAke,L C, s+,4f,- AMOUNT OF BOND CHECK NUMBER 3 110 DEPARTMENT Q 6L h h il n SUBMITTED BY lu C" 4. NAME vDATE RECEIVED BY FINANCE NAME DATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 5 2,Z lk— H:\Planning Departmcnt\PZC Secretary\fomts\BOND TRANSMITTAL 08-27.Ol.doc MEMORANDUMU To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer }� ? Date: 1/29/02 J RE: Wheeler Estates Bonds The Engineering Division has reviewed the bond requests for the Wheeler Estates Subdivision and SRD, and has the following recommendations. 1. The Bond for the Wheeler Estates Subdivision may be reduced to $35,000. 2. The initial bond for the Wheeler Estates SRD should be set at$395,000. 3. We recommend that the bond for the Wheeler Estates SRD be reduced to $183,000 based on the work completed to date. 77777 ZV ;TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE s SBpITIIQN GENERAL♦ `� # i CHANGE ORIIER; CONTACT PE�RSQaT '' � ." • a °' 1 .t .�sh one. No: f s _ Site Na�me � 77�7` P&Z No s Owner � �A"1 �,C ��S Phone No !" Contractor Signature of Owner Date: JOWIQ zig Signature o f Design S?ngr, ` Date:, . 1 ,q r : di r . Four (4 ) copies of plan/pr6file of Change. ) .: ..�" � c,� . �� �` . �►`, „fit"" �-p-j a. Reason fs�r 'Ch�rrge: (^Whys s onteecu�r�+ ) CfF� r APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Town Engin per .k, :a..w.r� �:.._am -:i ♦.,�.� t_d-, x, ��.kS,vr^� -' Js+ .� } '6+�0. �'krw. d .�. _-a � „ } ?'--R"'� -} l:„ ,.g� .*." "'-.= "�' ....R t ^aa.t ,sK+.,r:a�.*.C!<1a Fx,:ci«r...•:-..,v�,:«., �-:� �.s+'t.in... 5-:. L'., ,,a'?.. .r ,«.+. ,'l:+ r �`!, �'l^l�'. �.�r�3i� ��4 . .:..",� .. 'fie,. -- ;_ ;•. , Other ' - e •fir .�tx _ i x 4i �. STAFF COMMENTSz ' White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod - 'Engineering Department LAW OFFICES RECEIVED CUMMINGS,LANZA AND PURNHAGEN,L.L.C. rp 1 1610 ELLINGTON ROAD FEB p 1 2002 POST OFFICE BOX 667 SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074-0667 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. (860)644-3473 FAX(860)644-3347 HAROLD R.CUMIVIINGS EDWARD R.KUEHN MICHAEL J.LANZA OF COUNSEL VINCENT J.PURNHAGEN January 30, 2002 Ms. Marcia Banach, AICP Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT. 06074 RE: Wheeler Estates Subdivision: Open Space Fee Dear Marcia: Just a note to confirm the conversation which I had with you and Barry Guliano on Thursday, January 24n'. Our understanding is that in accordance with your discussion with Walter Kebalo on January 23rd, the sum of$1,700.00 will be paid "on account" of any open space fee which may be due to the town pursuant to Section C.l.d. of the South Windsor Subdivision Regulations at time of issuance of certificate of occupancy. The payment will be held in escrow pending resolution of the open space fee due the town. In the event that the total fee is less than $1,700.00 per lot, then a refund will be due. In the event that the open space fee is determined to be in excess of$1,700.00 per lot,then, additional payment will be made at that time. Our understanding is that the open space fee will be determined by mutually agreeable appraisal as required by the regulations. Sinc ely yours, 1 mmings IHRC/lr cc: Walter Kebalo, Barry Guliano 40W n SC44 s* 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 l�"&SOR•C�ac AREA CODE 860/644-2511 February 1, 2002 Mr Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties LLC ,V South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Appl 00-28P, Wheeler Estates This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted at the January 29, 2002, meeting to reduce the subdivision bond for Wheeler Estates Subdivision from $170,000.00 to $35,000.00. At the same meeting they established the setting and reduction of the Wheeler Estates Senior Residence Development bond at $395,000.00 and reduced to $183.000.00. Please forward the appropriate bonds at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission KMcC/kag cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official S�wN af4 Tiown 0 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 R.Co TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 April 18, 2002 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits - Appl #00-28P, Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates SBR $170,000 6/29/02 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, ` it tau 4�11 Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah y �-Q W n 07'e S-1CWL11 �• O * � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �OSOR.coN� TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 June 14, 2002 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letter of Credit Appl #00-28P, Wheeler Estates. We Have not as yet received any renewals of the letters of credit, which expire June 29, 2002, as noted in our previous renewal request of April 18, 2002. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the June 25, 2002, agenda of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Calling of the letters of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe, AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL,kah ,. +a ... ,r-v :'R^!'.� _..c-wr.�.. •* .v�r y, :rs�1t cbv'_".fi..tRS'?1'xc*R. j'',+i<'.T''°R �'. "' "1`ila . _P.'xR.' 6rv,'ii ,r TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE POR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON_ ����, �.. _,� .�� :. Phone No. :. Address �� f fyyy Si tName - ,- � -fi•rtA '� -�-3 ��z P&Z No. ,�® Owner t. -: -' l Phone No.�t T 1�'T -Contractor TM� Signature of Owner LC Date: Signature of Design Engr Date: Ila /a CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include yy Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) i r of Reason for Changes (Why is change required) ". - APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning+_- "f�. Date:_ Town .Engineer Date: ' L -Dir. of Public Wog s Date: Other: C Dates STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineerin. p��e,F:F•k.o NtiA as!� /0/ 1 �, A 747 c Opel,� •` �- S � :��' _ � ���•�/sq/�/7/( '�111�T1OC[7{- my�,��cF7 04 4 l It LOCATION s it r. SANITARY tA"AL 02 •+�,; ► _ 15 �f ' 1 ;.+►,,. t ' •� � 0 00 do dalol WE OL solel IF 1 Xr - '25 . / 54 ' 1 I / •./ ,/ ww ww i./ TO La— Ul,d 1-4 16 C- Robert C.Schechinger,Jr_ ASLA 10 Front Street,The Turbine House Landscape Architecture P.O.Box 246,Collinsville,CT 06022-0246 Master Planning Telephone:(860)693- 1025 Urban Design Facsimile:(860)693-4832 +�� Construction Administration September 17, 2002 �JJ Ms. Michele Lipe Deputy Planning Director Town Of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Conditions of Approval for our September 5, 2002 Change Order; Wheeler Estates Subdivision&Active Adult Community Development; Smith Street and Wheeler Drive; South Windsor We were notified of approval of the above referenced Change Order by your Office late last week. As always, we are appreciative of your timely acceptance of the presented site revisions, but were surprised by the Commissions conditional approval of the added three car space parking lot in the Landscaped Island in front of the#600 & #500 Building Units. The continuation of a pavement-grade sidewalk in front of these spaces is functionally unnecessary and inconsistent with the pattern of installed sidewalks throughout the remainder of the project. Requiring that these spaces be 25 L.F. deep is also onerous to this lot due to functional realities and related spatial constraints, as evidenced in the attached photographic exhibits. As Photo Exhibit# 1 illustrates,the side walk is terminated with curb ramps at either end of a similar parking lot adjacent to Building#200. The Landscaped Island in question has limitations to the depth of a parking lot due to the presence of a major utility manhole, as shown in Photo Exhibit#2, and would compromise the integrity of the planting strip, as well, with additional land taken for pavement. As it is currently constructed,the parking spaces will be 23.5 L.F. from inner curb face to Road Line, providing more than adequate depth for cars as well as safe pedestrian circulation across its mouth, as evidenced by Photo Exhibits# 3 . It should also be noted for our mutual future consideration of projects of this scale and nature,that the environmental behavioral pattern consistently observed for pedestrian circulation in these communities predominantly travels on the road pavement, as far away from the frontage of neighboring units, for obvious reasons: respect of privacy, lack of traffic volume and freedom to meander. We hope you will consider these points and supporting exhibits and reevaluate the necessity for this conditional approval. If you need any additional information or have any questions regarding our request,please call me at your earliest convenience and I will be happy to discuss those items to your satisfaction. Respectfully, ;oVrtVC.':S—checWgerf,yJrAt'IS'--LWA-- r Robert C.Scheehint er,Jr.ASLA The Turbine House, #10 Front Street Landscape Architect P.O. BON#2.16,Collinsville,CT O6022-0246 Master Planning Telephonc: (964))693-1025;Facsimile: (900)6934841 Urb;iti DcSign Email: BestLAlf oplcpc.com Conslniction Administration 7 � I Rolwrt C.Schechinger,Jr.ASLA The Turbine House. #10 Front Strut Landscape Architul P.O. Box#246,Collinsville, CT 06022-0246 Masser Planning Telephone: (860)693-1025-1 Facsimile: (860)6934841 Urban Design Email: BcstLAfijwoplcpc.corn Construction Administration �x nor s. . y .r I (�l3 TOWN OF SOUTH i;'.TVDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSO =hone Address G3 G �s . /✓ r ICE Site Name - P&Z No. Owner<, ��pp�'r //l Phone No Contractor Signature of OwnerDate:,-," f Signature of Desig4 Engr. Dater CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of Aange. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) >0," f,Ci !o:7�I Reason for Change (Why is change required) APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: i Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: .-�'�,� �• r ,1+, �t ;apt S. ll.t'<.�-'fs.L�1�.�.� 1���l tf..�x-+ /}S. Z`,�'l i f White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department Robert C.Schechinger,Jr.ASLA 10 Front Street,The Turbine House Landscape Architect P.O.Box 246,Collinsville,CT 06022-0246 Master Planning Telephone:(860)693- 1025 Urban Design Facsimile:(860)693 -4832 Construction Administration "� ��s c osvc7tc - - � •�o .0771 142 /41 TAT 69lt2 CA= ,��ll,,�r G�} T•�E��,G�li�'- �T�'L. c�/�;�1�/Z����a�vf7 Gov�72. 40VIM se' 71G�Z 07 s� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 '~OSOR- ° TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 V" October 7, 2002 Mr. Robert C. Schechinger, Jr. ASLA 10 Frond Street The Turbine House P.O. Box 246 Collinsville, CT 06022-0246 Re: Wheeler Estates Change Order dated September 5, 2002 Dear Mr. Schechinger, Jr.: This is to notify you that the Planning and Zoning Commission has agreed to modify the conditions of approval on the above referenced change order per your request dated September 17, 2002, to allow the sparking spaces 23.5 L.F. from the inner curb face to the road line as constructed. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning, AICP �4awM aa� -70 of S •. � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �OsoR.0 TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 k December 3, 2002 Mr. Walter Kebalo KY Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits -Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates TOLLAND $10,000 1/31/03 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Michele R.. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kah RECEIVED REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS DEC 3 0 2002 58 HARTFORD TURNPIKE 1rc TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT 06084 SOUTHWINDSORMNNINGDEPT, (860) 871-8015 1-888-22 1-1 292 ROBERT G.STEWART,SRA FAX (860) 870-7752 DAVID H.GOWER,SRA December 20, 2002 Michelle Lipe Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Kebalo Wheeler Estates Smith Street, South Windsor Dear Ms. Lipe: The letter is to inform you that I have been hired by K.F. Properties to complete an appraisal of the above noted property. The function of the appraisal is so the Town can calculate the amount of the fee in lieu of open space for the subdivision. As we discussed, I will be ignoring the eventual lots 1 & 5 which were existing lots improved with houses prior to the subdivision. I will be appraising the remaining 11.88 acres(see attached site plan with subject highlighted) as raw land prior to any subdivision approval. I will be valuing the land with this limitation as of October 31, 2000, the date the subdivision was approved. I will be working on the appraisal in February of 2003 and deliver an appraisal report to you and K.F. Properties by February 24, 2003. Unfortunately I already have commitments and cannot do the appraisal any sooner. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, 6�bq- Robertbert G. Stewart, SRA Cc: Walter Kebalo, K.F. Properties [03018L] � �- LZ ^o d 00-6oi - l O I L� � •1 m / ' I Cl I _ -_0�-5Z 9�-0� �Z 5G -0� -Oc oo'90 - - , LZ-0� �. _ �_Oc-�� -0�-5z y, -Oc—5 z 0 Oc- o 0T-5 0T c_Oc-SZ OT Y I lG-O`--SZi oc-S� �z — �tOwN SF,t� F Town aies-OUA W,&2d� C � v 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ���osoR•co�`�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 11, 2001 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Appl 00-28P, Wheeler Estates Please be advised that the Planningand Zoning g Commission voted on 1/9/01 to grant a second 90-day extension to file mylars for the above-referenced subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The new filing deadline is 8/16/01. This extension is the final extension permitted under Connecticut General Statutes Section 8-25. Very truly yours, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf K.F. Properties, LLC �- 176 Smith Street South Windsor,CT Phone:(860)648-4446 Fax:(860)644-2577 January 16, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor Re: Kebalo Wheeler Estates SRD, Application#00-28P Dear Commission Members: You have reviewed our plans and have requested that we revise them to provide additional sidewalks in the Kebalo Wheeler Estates SRD. We have reviewed Mr. Iazetta's proposed changes to the sidewalks and would like to incorporate his suggestions into our design with the following modifications: I. As illustrated on the attached plan of the SRD, we would like to accept Mr. Iazetta's proposed sidewalks except for the portions marked A, B and C. In those three areas we would like to omit the sidewalks as it is not practical to install sidewalks around those parking spaces because of the proposed necessary grade at that location, the existing mature trees located there (which we would like to keep), and proposed landscaping. In those areas we have made other modifications to improve walking traffic flow. We request that you allow us to omit the sidewalks labeled A, B and C on the attached map. 2. There are certain areas of the SRD which will have less walking traffic than other areas. These areas are highlighted in orange on the attached plan. We agree with Mr. Iazetta's recommendation to add sidewalks at those locations, but we would like these sidewalks to be three (3) feet wide. The main sidewalks would continue to be four(4) feet wide. The four foot wide sidewalks are marked in yellow on the attached plan. We request that you allow us to build the orange-marked sidewalks three feet wide and the yellow-marked sidewalks four feet wide. This should not detract from the usability of the sidewalks. If you approve these modifications, we will update our plans to reflect these changes. Once again, Thank you. i:� z Tawn �SOU& ?4P&U&ot � u 9 � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-00) � AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 March 8, 2001 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on 2/27/01 to set the subdivision bond at $346,000 for subdivision improvements. This bond is for the subdivision only and does not include the senior residence development. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer �towN af''<� r T11W.I.An Ole SOW% ?40&"�at e � y ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 •co�'�� AREA CODE 860/ 644-2511 March 30,2001 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Appl 00-28P, Wheeler Estates—Construction of Model Homes Dear Mr. DeMallie: We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on March 27, 2001for construction of two model homes for application 00-28P, Wheeler Estates subject to the following conditions: ♦ All normal building procedures still apply, e.g.,provision of emergency access, building permit procedures, etc. ♦ The model homes will not be offered for sale and cannot receive certificate of occupancy until the site bond is posted and final plans are filed in the Town Clerk's office. All normal certificate of occupancy procedures remain in effect. Sincerely, - �I wlv,- �V. Walter J. Me , Chairm Planning and Zoning Co ssion cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Superintendent of Pollution Control Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer •DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis March 19,2001 Marcia Banach,Planning Director Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: Wheeler Estates SRD Wheeler Road South Windsor,Connecticut DPI Proj.No.91-595 Dear Marcia: On behalf of my client,K.F.Properties,L.L.C.,I hereby request permission to build two model homes(an end unit and a townhouse)at Wheeler Estates Senior Residence Development. Thank you. Design Professionals,Inc. By: Peter R DeMallie Principal cc: Walter Kebalo 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 -Fax: (860) 291-8757 11 P t Or1N ate T-Own 0_'19 SotdA ?d&_1,d4-0t s � °. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 soa-ca TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 May 30, 2001 Mr. Galen Semprebon Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Semprebon: Re:Preconstruction Meeting—App100-28P Wheeler Estates SRD IN ATTENDANCE—See attached The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Smith St. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved and stamped plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist required for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six (6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2) inch layers maximum .e 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures, pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary)of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to paving and after subgrade formation. 9. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. 10. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 11. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Andy Kebalo in the field at phone 644-5124. 12. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 13. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 14 Forty-eight-(48)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 15. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 16. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m.,no work on Sunday. 17. DOT permit needed for all work within state road. Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 18. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 19. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling,therefore,the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 20. Inspection of gravel access roads required prior to placement of topsoil. 21. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as-builts. 22. For concrete sidewalks, 8"depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk is constructed before lot development,the locations must be indicated on the as-built plans. If a proposed driveway location is moved,the sidewalk must be removed to the nearest expansion joint and rebuilt to the proper depth with reinforcement. 23. If a concrete monument is located within a driveway, a cast iron frame and cover must be provided for town public improvement specifications. 24. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals,the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. 25. During construction for individual house lots, lot to lot drainage must be addressed with drainage-swales as necessary. For lawn establishment,Town staff will be requiring erosion control measures to be installed prior to the issue of the certificate of occupancy to ensure soil stabilization. A detailed erosion control plan must be implemented and depicted on the plot plan for review prior to the issuance of the building permit—most particularly on lots with extensive grading. Planning Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting(if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. ' Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. y 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building_Denartment 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf cc: Town Engineer Karl Reichle, Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control CL&P SNET 4 MEMORANDUM To: Michele Lipe, Assistant Director of Planning From: Michael J. Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works Date: June 14, 2001 Re: Wheeler Estates Subdivision We have reviewed the bond estimate for the Wheeler Estates Subdivision. It is recommended that the bond for this work be reduced by $176,000.00 to $170,000.00. MJG/cm S:ENGINEER\Prcj.—P&Z&Wetland Apps\Wheeler EstatesVune 14 comments PROJECT: (AHO- I F.STATO-S TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STREET:WNF6L6f, 90ft BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: 00-Z8 P 1999,CALENDAR YEAR ENGINEE 2401 DATE: ,1 Bond Bond Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantitv Unit Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing &Grubbing LS y 2. Strip&Stockpile Topsoil ICY I 1 00 2.00 2 200-00 Earth Excavation (Excluding Roadway& 3. Trench) CY (050 10.00 6,500-00g�45�ti 4. Roadway Excavation CY /g 00 12.00 ZI (000. 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 12.00 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-15 CY 15.00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY 18.00 9. Roadway Exc. (Rock) CY 50.00 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc. 0-20 CY 150.00 14. Formation of Subgrade SY 27vOD 1.50 3 (5o.00 15. Subbase Gravel CY 375 20.00 -7-,500.CC) -7 5oD•00 16. Processed Aggregate TONS (p0() 18.00 10 800.OD 10 $00. 17. Common Borrow CY 10.00 18. Gravel Borrow CY 15.00 1• Bit. Concrete Ass�n�E 19. (Class 1) TONS 17S 50.00 i 750. 61750.00 /401alu 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 20. (Class II) TONS 11-75 55.00 8,150,C01 �Q 7150•cO 'varies Sub-Total 35, 8 00.00 Page 1 of 6 Bond Bond Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantitv Unit Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 21. 16"Asphalt Lip Curbing LF 1200 3.00 3 600.0p 22. Road Widening Complete SY 50.00 23. Conc Sidewalk 4'Wide LF 1-3 30.00 320 3w-0 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 24. 60"RCP Class IV In Place LF 130.00 25. 54" RCP Class IV In Place LF 100.00 26. - 48" RCP Class IV In Place LF 75.00 27. 42"- RCP Class IV In Place LF 65.00 28. 36"RCP Class IV In Place LF 60.00 29. 30" RCP Class IV In Place LF 50.00 30. 24"RCP Class IV In Place LF 42.00 I 31. 18" RCP Class IV In Place LF 35.00 32. 15"RCP Class IV In Place 30.00 33. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8"ADS-N-12 or Equal 21.00 35. 10"ADS-N-12 or Equal 22.50 36. 12"ADS-N-12 or Equal 24.00 37. 15"ADS-N-12 or Equal 25.50 23 307.00 1715-50 38. 18"ADS-N-12 or Equal L• F 28.00 ( $ op ADS-m-a- L,F 90 W,00 Sub-Total 5 374035.00 Page 2 of 6 Bond Bond Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 UNDERDRAINS 39. 6"PVC SDR 35 In Place LF 15.00 40. 8"PVC SDR 35 In Place LF 20.00 - RIPRAP 41. Modified Riprap CY 45.00 4 . v 42. Intermediate Riprap CY 10 45.00 43. Standard Riprap CY 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ' 44. Type"C"Catch Basin EA 3 1500.00 500-.CO _J,3500-00 45. Type"C" Double Grate EA 2000.00 CYAR4 DRAIN 46. Type"C-L"Catch Basin EA Z 1500.00 -33 OCD.00 3D OM-eb 47. Manhole EA 1500.00 ' 48. Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA 2500.00 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA 2000.00 50. Headwall EA 51. Endwall EA 52. Box Culvert LF 53. 15" Flared End EA 450.00 54. 18" Flared End EA 500.00 L G���5 55. 24" Flared End EA Z 550.00 00.CO � 156. 136" Flared End EA 850.00 Sub-Total $ 9�50o.00 Page 3 of 6 Bond Bond Reduction Reduction Item Descrintion Unit Quantitv Unit Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 57. Detention Outlet Structure EA ( 2500.00 Z $00.Q0 10'Wide Gravel Access 58. Road LF 15.00 59. Reset M.H. or C.B. EA 550.00 60. SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 61. 12"'PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 40.00 62. 10"PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 37.00 63. 8"PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 955 35.00 33 ZS 4-LATekAL5) 64. 6"PVC In Place SDR 35 LF jOa 30.00v060,OD SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65. Sanitary Manhole EA 7 1,500.00 SbO.OD Sanitary Manhole w/Drop 66. Inlet EA 2,500.00 Sanitary Manhole over 10 67. FT. 2,000.00 68. 69. STRUCTURES & MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF • 71. Fence (Type: ) LF • Guide Rail 172. (Type: ) TLF Sub-Total $ �'r r?"7 47•'t�0' Page 4 of 6 Bond Bond Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantitv Unit Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 End Anchorage 73. (Type: ) EA ' 74. Guide Post EA 100.00 75. Pavement Marking LF 80 1.50 70. 00 72-0,pip 76. Street Signs EA 75.00 7 5 60 75,ap 77. Traffic signs EA Z 75.00 150. 1.50.00 78. Street Lights EA g 1,000.00 4 oop. 4 (gyp (NG�p0�5 79. Fumishing/Placing Topsoil SY 3500 2.50 g 750. -7 ouO, 00 �Eft, Fertilizing, Seeding and 1W.Vt6S 80. Mulching SY 3 2.50 8 750.Op belt. Asp 81. Trees EA 150.00 2 .CD 4,4604) Maintenance/Protection of 82. Traffic LS ' 83. Construction Staking LS 1400, 84. As-Builts LS (00pp,00 ('aintOlD 85. Iron Pins EA 12. 100.00 1, 2 O,Op 200,CO 86. Concrete Monuments EA 13 250.00 3 2,50.00 250.0() BIT 87. Driveway-Bit. Conc. SY 1150 20.00 9 000. 9)OCb,O1) PV*.AIM 88. 89. 90. 'varies Sub-Total $ Page 5 of 6 Original Estimat Bond Reduction#1 Bond Reduction#2 Sub-Total Page 1 $ 704 550.00 $ 35,AOp.OD $ Sub-Total Page 2 $ 84,30'7.o0 $ 5-33(o35-00 $ Sub-Total Page 3 $ Zq,050.00 $ A)500.00 $ Sub-Total Page 4 $ g9,425 00 $ QS $ Sub-Total Page 5 $ 48,7-95.00 $ ,-7 9� 5_oo , $ Sub-Total . $ 27 135 7�� 40 $ v0 00 $ 25% Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 33; 93Z,50 $ ' TOTAL $ 3.4 5)78 3.75 $ (e 9 I(a(0 2.5a $ 5CT qTl-. standard forms/bonds/bond estimate form Page 6 of 6 a - �t0,0 ate t� ti r -0 n 01 �• e �,ti•. • ��� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 °SOR•C0 TELEPHONE (860).644-2511 July 10,2001 Mr. Peter DeMallie Design Professionals, Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: App100-28P, Wheeler Estates Subdivision—Construction of Model Homes Dear Mr. DeMallie: We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on June 26, 2001 to approve the construction of two model homes for application 00-28P, Wheeler Estates Subdivision subject to the following conditions: ♦ All normal building procedures still apply, e.g.,provision of emergency access, building permit procedures, etc. ♦ The model homes will not be offered for sale and cannot receive certificate of occupancy until the site bond is posted and final plans are filed in the Town Clerk's office. All normal certificate of occupancy procedures remain in effect. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Superintendent of Pollution Control Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Office DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis June 19, 2001 Marcia Banach, Director of Planning.. Town of South Windsor . 1540 Sullivan Avenue `k South Windsor, CT 06074 � Re: Wheeler Estates Subdivision DPI Project No. 91-595 Wheeler Road South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Marcia: On behalf of my client, K.F. Properties, LLC, I hereby request permission to build two model homes at Wheeler Estates Subdivision. Thank you. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. By: Karen Isherwood Project Engineer cc: Walter Kebalo 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 9 Fax: (860) 291-8757 tpy1M d�+ C S• � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 �OsOR.CO TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 July 11, 2001 'Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F.Properties,LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: App100-28P, Wheeler Estates This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 11,2001 to reduce the subdivision bond from$346,000 to $170,000. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Design Professionals, Inc. • J BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: �� a CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER NAME & ADDRESS i" Lro i PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS LOT SUBDIVISION W N�aey- S�- (p -P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER AMOUNT OF BOND �, 0 D 0 fc a CHECK NUMBER- --sa-' DEPARTMENT �J.1to SUBMITTED BY DATE NAME RECEIVED BY FINANCE DATE ATE SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER S 000 l S:\ENGINEER\FORMS\Office Forms\BOND TRANSMITTAL.doc RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR J U N 2 0 2001 STAFF SITE CHANGE SOR FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION SONEERINUTH DEPT. ENGINEERING DEPT. GENERAL: i� CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON -Lt& Ltd Phone No. (o4q-504 Address Site Name 1 P&Z No. Owner W kL;y!nyL �AyjQg I oarm 2 �1-� Phone No. (� - -S!Z► Contractor �( Signature of Owner SAQ Date: O Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) �q -AV, y'� cJ� ���✓ � >C�I? GtYI �i�✓/��t7//_ y/ /� y kah Tend �'YAin d/.���L Reason for Change: (Why is change required) v el -6 v/V ���LGl� f�4t�G/f9 CAS Cbf9 II�ide `7�f� � .S/ ZZI U✓Y1�JL • APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department I 1 CB S � dap3 � r St 11 'M , $ )6. I f r i t i ul ` 604 '- � 705 '603 , 704 ,a , 0 1 703 �^ 602 . ' (;g f ' r 25' BUFFER --�-_ 10' R.Y. Z 5185156 INSTALL ROOF LEADERS/FOUNDATION DRAI1M I a-uped7a t " ETS INV 98.0 INSTALL RODENT SCREENS ` t 8504J l f co 91 I - _ + ... .................... LOT #1 � - .Q• `E, � AREA ( ( / LOT 31 057t yt. — , - ARE n ry 0.71 ac. ` I 2030 3 0.46 ti House 0.5 i�54 o 175.00 PM r obd ( Garage FRONT Y. IWO 1 A \ 1 ► I h + 0o��+ ,.,,_,.�- • 4 tl' M5� Tor q t �= 1-29 / \ L 6 R= .00 T. 71 ` , o , lid --: YARD 140 �\. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION ; GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON - � � hone No. Address /1f,V t�, ter. ✓ ,� ,'..d. 'r"'' :r�%' . Site Name . P&Z No + Owners' , Phone No Contractor , Signature of Owner "� Date .�;l �f✓ c Signature of Design Engr: lee' . ( .• Date - ! '-CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of4hange. Include Four (4) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) '""�• �w„"_• � �i1R, � ''��.4f..�16�G.'7� `�y:+'V•.... �✓' fryr,,r'/C�',:� •/f�r"'.++,�Sr�Y �/f..�� �,''-y��,�`�{• ��. '� Reason for Change.: (Why is change required:) APPROVALS: (As Required) Dr. Of Plannin Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir.. of Public Works 'Date: : Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: z ' White - Town Engineer .Yellow - Applicant ' Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod --Engineering Department l 4A TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL- CIMGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Walter Kobalo Phone No. 644-►3134 Address 301 Nobalo Lane Site Name Wheeler, Eatttet BID P&Z No. Owner K.F. Properties Phone No. 644"3134 Contractor K.F. Properties Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Engr. Date: �� 1°► CHANGE: (Describe location on and nature of an e. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of -Change. ) Increase the squat* footage of condominium unit 301 from 1,337 to square foefo nnp-out" living room located ova .the back of e nn y 151-00 r Reason for Change:: (Why is change required) FtosPOO ti a owner of condominium unit 301 has requested this ' change. Prospective orrnor would like she. maximum squat* footage_,aI ed. 1.400. square feet is the maximum allowed in a Senior Resident* De�tlopoest. APPROVALS: (As Re uir ) Dir. Of Planning . Date: Q . , Town Engineer- ,r Dates t` l G Dir. of 'Public orks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of 'Planning. Goldenrod Engineering Department � � .. PAP o ' r \ 11 / • /.: dwv �. �� �► r • 1 «o ,• '^• • , ' �' �, f of'. tea■ `� � �' TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR SUFF;: SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & . S BDIVISION , GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON . - � Fhone No. ,,,�, Address t `Site Name , Owner .4- R sue , Phone No Contractor ' Signature of Owner Date: � Signature of Design Engr. J Date: f , CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of hange. Include Four (4 ) copies of planlprof.ile of Change. ) �# Apwr d Reason for Change: (Why is change required a .r *� 1 Aor .APPROVALS: (As Requir ) Dir. Of Planning Dater Town Engineer Date: Dir. oil Public Works Dates Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS:' r F White Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department' s 411 t " TOWN„ OF. SOUTH WINDSOR 'STAFF:1$ITE GH NGE FOR SITE & ,SUBDIVISION CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON lrH� fw��'lrc +�+ Phone NO. Addxess ta,JN r. t rrr F ! ►t Site Name 'w -'r, r`fer AS Z9'V"& t>j P&Z, No. 08- Owner • 1- -o �* t fe r /2,. Phone `No: Y 1 Contractor t Signature of Owner, i ,;! Date: E ! v +�t -- Signature of Design Engr. Date: iw Q __ CHANGEt (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) At r - Reason for Change: (Why is change required) IL ti Lt?f' tr a r't �,r 7►N w *� Irt r ! A A it%W At P"ik IV* i G r o w l-r. h.01.4 HJ w'� h�M �✓� APPROVALS: (As Requir 'Dir. Of Planning Date: �l / Town Ejigineer i Date Dir. of Public orks Date: s Other: Date: . STAFF COMMENTS: r J 44 w A3 ,L,y.nytCi(rav C' C F VP,f. Tr?,/" r.,.yJ,,p—�r�-. ,�ly;a �� €.�,- ,•p,-.i r •.4+. s,e. , Cut p'ft Yz�: dr 1" S e'4l-ydp a{ J�tfs1� 1 /fit: - Y�..Er ,f 4�V t T.q (if, '�"i. p it,.;aA ti'� dnn i• dr s +'t1 . '4,� /41+W fK h 3 .. `{'�f �[:}`' �4�`a. �f'Vr'p; tJf� 1, -�y f„J h� �,)p•.� �A �7 Y tl f�`''� #v (s:,�+ ;{er e- `i.( 7" •�'ti f ✓��r.AF �( S.. �� ,�„3 h^,ta^r s r•a�� to+�rt.G �Z + �t� 4� �/,►F� /�l+*°" f%#/�rfC'(,�C.J White Town Engineer Yellow Applicant Pink Director of Planning G©ldenrod - Engineering Department TOWN OF SOUTH WINOSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR 'SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT. PERSON &O& MALD Phone No.. 0.3—/520 Address Site Name P&Z No, Owner Phone No. Contractor - ; Signature of Owner Date-; if A&t Signature of Design Engr Date CHANGE:` (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4)- copies of plan/profile of Change.,) Moor or uj jv ' r Reason for Change: (Why is change required) k XNAMOIA; 1,d7"/AID . APPROVALS (As Requir Dir. Of Planning , Date: Town Engineer Date: cc�� Dix. of Public Works-' Date z Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: t White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department i ,y am[;77 , '_0 1g2 l_I n do CHANGE ORDER #2 WHEELER ESTATES SRD H _ KEBALO LANE �� R=87 , hh SOUTH WINDSOR, CT SMH 6 5*00 TO ELIMINATE CURBING ALONG NORTHERN _ T= �� i�/ /! M' / `�o1'S H 500, SIDE OF ISLAND IN ORDER TO REDUCE i ' GRADING WITHIN ISLAND AND MAINTAIN EXISTING TREES, ALSO ALTERINGCONFIGURATION OF OF ISLAND AND 1' ,A , S�5 3p �1 00 ENTRANCE TO REDUCE AREA OF O 27 / I—♦� / , W o + L=210. ' J D j PAVEMENT WHILE MAINTAINING A MINIMUM \ / �j, SO•� / f 6 M y 18' PAVEMENT WIDTH ALONG COMMON rr j t / / _ ~_ I �7 t 2 cQ' �� , R= DRIVES AND MIN. 24' WIDTH AT A K Al2 ENTRANCE. ' i �? `/� CO � � C4 1 � � �DR�V 1 o .. p ��C M12Y n `r 1 ' II TC o02 09 '4 90.0' I , / Z' ' REDUCE AR 1 ! T = 7 1 . , j L = 14.2/ ( / E F No `` .e•- OG'E N DRi AND 1 WIDE CIE. -as° M J °d 1 d / R=14 .04 " LEGEND L=180.47 / i / O IRON PIN TO BE SET w / / D 1 X �a / \ Ta �10&1.15 • EXISTING IRON PIN / , / D / Delt[—10'54'59" J i MONUMENT i0 BE SET ' - - J ELIMINATE @1T. Es A _ ". / ■ EXISTING MONUMENT - Y - EXISTINGD UTILITY POLE j fl , / f ' SM ORTHERN SIDE `'a+ PROPOSED UTILITY POLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND PIPE —E]- PROPOSED CATCH BASIN AND PIPE PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE AND PIPE PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE AND PIPE PROPOSED WATER MAIN AND HYDRANT - , / t / - _ ' () '�JQ e +-V I —R.L.— ROOF LEADER 00 ���`•-� Gj � / O � ! SANITARY LATERAL / / f' / /•-• - - - _ / 4 •^ate' 3.7 y —W— WATER LATERAL eJ ��' / / / <./ -236- EXISTING CONTOUR 1: , J-�..�.;i�':r PROPOSED CONTOUR �• - �i ,=}, / � "a 150.3+ PROPOSED SPOT GRADE ,r d O .� SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION ^ i.!ice• / /i''"-- / / / f ' / ' / 'A- LIMIT [^ ---- OF UPLAND RENEW AREA (, / / •'' / / / D /•'/ M H 8 J , INLAND WETLANDS \ / ' / / / APPROX.LIMITS OF CLEARING A17 WETLANDS FLAG `\ / / / / / , / 1 /\ ' —(L1 / THIS SURVEY AND MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 20-300b-1 THRU 20-300b-20 OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES- "STANDARDS FOR SURVEYS AND MAPS IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT"AS ENDORSED BY THE CONNEC71CUT ASSOCIATION OF LAND SURVEYORS, INC. THIS SURVEY CONFORMS TO HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASS A-2. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF MAP IS SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT AS NOTED HEREON. `�•—T� 12882 RICHARD P. MARTEL LIC. No. 1.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,EXISTING UTILITY REVISIONS GRAPHIC SCALE 860 291-8755 (�/� n pp M SHEET LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON CHANGE ORDER 2 PREPARED-POR: 17A:lflPWO VU�.I� AVAILABLE INFORMATION.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 20 0 10 20 resign �O�Q4�� MAP SHOULD EN HELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ■ ofessionals., ine. Wheeler Estates SRD uBVy 2. ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE STAKED IN THE FIELD BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Ke1balo Lane OF� 3.THIS PLAN IS INVALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE DRAHN BY KM/ JOB NO.:595-cot IMPRESSION SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE 1 inch = 20 feet civil engineers • planners • Surveyors OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/SURVEYOR. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 165 south satellite road, south windsor, Connecticut 06074 South Windsor CONNECTICUT CHECKED BY.- CBS DATE.• 8-6-01 tOW N St ��m �s� �• t F C 7 s C� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 29, 2001 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits - Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Wheeler Estates TOLLAND $10,000 11311CA In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kag SONN Srq oSOUtA ?40bsd4kA � n01 s- 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO 4;p AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 31,2001 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kebalo: RE: WHEELER ESTATES SRD Section 4.1.12.tn of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations requires that a site bond guaranteeing completion of the development's infrastructure be posted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in any SRD development. The regulation also has a provision for reduction of this bond for completed site work; and for a 10% maintenance bond for a one-year period after completion of the development (copy enclosed). In order to satisfy this zoning requirement, please have your site engineer complete the enclosed Bond Estimate Form, return it to us, and we will have the Engineering Dept. set a bond amount for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Your engineer can use the same form to estimate the value of the improvements already completed, so that the bond amount can be reduced at the same time the original amount is established. After the reduced bond amount is established, please forward to us either a letter of credit or cash (passbook, certified check) in accordance with the enclosed bonding policy. Also, as Town Attorney Guliano has indicated that a Fee in Lieu of Open Space is required in connection with Wheeler Estates subdivision, that fee needs to be established in accordance with the enclosed regulation. Your earliest attention to these matters is appreciated, so that Certificates of Occupancy can continue to be granted without interruption. Please contact me at 644-2511 ext. 253 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, "-WtOL�� 6) Marcia A. Banach,AICP Director of Planning MB/sf cc: Design Professionals, Inc. Jeff Doolittle,Town Engineer John Collins, Chief Building Official y Sawtl Sf+ kru` c x r on o ?1&d� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 oR,co . AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 21, 2001 Mr. Walter Kebalo K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06095 Dear Mr. Kebalo: Re: _ Appl #00-28P, Wheeler Estates We have not as yet received an renewals of the letters of cre dit,edit which expire January u 31, 2002, as noted in our previous renewal request of November 29, 2001. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the January 22, 2002 agenda of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Calling of the letters of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal. Very truly yours, Michele R. LiPe, AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kag LETTER OF CREDIT LISTING 1/8/02 APPLICANT APPL# BANK AMOUNT EXP. LTRS WHEELER ESTATES 00-28P TOLLAND $ 10,000 01/31/02 12/01/01** EH SAND AND GRAVEL 99-54P SBR, $91,000 02/15/02 12/01/01* CHASE ORCHARDS PH 2 97-88P GBT $156,600 03/23/02 01/01/02* POND EST RED ROCK 90-77P SBM $983,000 04/25/02 02/01/02 SB ROCKVILLE 99-60P SBR $25,875 04/01/02 02/01/02 WHEELER ESTATES 00-28P SBR $170,000 06/29/02 04/01/02 TARGET 99-58 WSC $ 10,000 07/27/02 05/01/02 TARGET 99-58 WSC $25,000 07/27/02 05/01/02 SB ROCKVILLE 99-63P SBR $ 3,000 11/01/02 09/01/02 STEELTECH SITE 95-16P NOBEL-BOND $ 5,000 11/05/02 09/01/02 STEELTECH SITE 95-16P NOBEL-BOND $ 3,000 11/05/02 09/01/02 CHASE ORCHARDS 97-88P GBT $175,800 10/29/02 08/01/02 EVERGREEN EST 00-32P SBM $178,000 02/02/03 12/01/02 EVERGREEN EST 00-32P SBM $10,000 10/30/05 08/30/05 EVERGREEN EST 00-32P SBM $10,000 10/30/05 08/30/05 CUTLER RIDGE II 98-60P $217,000 11/12/02 09/01/02 CUTLER RIDGE II 98-60P $ 10,000 11/12/02 09/01/02 check STRAWBERRY FIELDS 01-24P SBM $30,000 12/19/02 10/01/02 STRAWBERRY FIELDS 01-24P SBM $20,000 12/19/02 10/01/02 STRAWBERRY FIELDS 01-24P SBM $ 10,000 12/19/02 10/01/02 AVERY MEADOWS 96-26P $64,000 Ox/18/00 Ox/18/02 CUTLER RIDGE 97-41P $125,000 01/24/02 Maintenance DEMING HILL EST 6A 01-12P TOLLAND $108,500 01/02/04 12/01/03 DEMING HILL EST 6B 01-12P TOLLAND $192,500 01/02/04 12/01/03 *First follow-up letter sent. **Second follow-up letter sent. *Note: To be released upon expiration. Two months ahead for the first letter One month ahead for the second letter For second letter—placed on the agenda H/LipeBonds/Current Bonds/letters of credit listing PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, Michael Gantick,. Thomas Field, Bill Lanning, John Bond, Ray Favreau, Karl Reic e, a Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula, Jerry Iazzetta FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: Location: Site Plan ,V� Subdivision No. Acres 7 Zone - 2 O Industrial O Commercial O Residential No. Lots/Units- Water: VPublic O Private Well Sewerage:#Public O Septic system(s) 7 Project Description: - Future Town-owned property involved? Yes O No Znew street(s) O new detention area O new open space/recreation area O active O passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by '//y/o and return to the Planning Department. A..x 2 can. n ��- 1t--o �5 1 C� MATERIALS TYPICAL BUILDING COLORS:7/18/2000 ROOFS; 2 COLORS - 25 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES ALL THE SAME COLOR WITHIN EACH BUILDING GROUP COLORS BARKWOOD BROWN OR SLATE BLEND BRICK 2 SAMPLES-WATSONTOWN ROSE OR CREAMY WHITE VINYL SIDING 3 COLORS-SAME COLOR TO BE USED ON BUILDING GROUP SIDING COLORS HERITAGE CREAM SANDSTONE BEIGE WOODLAND MIST FISHSCALE SHAKES VINYL FANCY CUTS- 2 COLORS VICTORIAN BLUE&COLONIAL WHITE EXTERIOR TRIM; ALUMINIUM CLAD-COLONIAL WHITE WINDOWS VINYL CLAD-WHITE ENTRANCE DOORS 3 COLORS- BUYER'S CHOICE INK BLACK COTTAGE RED NEWBURG GREEN WOOD PORCH COLUMNS 6'TURNED WOOD PAINTED WHITE WITH COLOR BANDS OF BRIARWOOD COTTAGE RED NEWBURG GREEN GARAGE DOORS EMBOSSED PANEL ALUNIlNIUM-WHITE COLOR SCHEMES SCHEME A 1.ROOF BARKWOOD BROWN VINYL SIDING HERITAGE CREAM TRIM COLONIAL WHITE FISHSCALES COLONIAL WHITE OR VICTORIAN BLUE DOORS DARK FOREST GREN,BLACK OR COTTAGE RED WINDOWS VINYL CLAD WHITE BRICK WATSONTOWN(ROSE) GARAGE DOORS WHITE EMBOSSED PANELS SCHEME B 1.ROOF SLATE BLEND VINYL SIDING SANDSTONE BEIGE WINDOWS WHITE VINYL TRIM COLONIAL WHITE FISHSCALES COLONIAL WHITE BRICK CREAMY WHITE DOORS DARK FOREST GREEN GARAGE DOORS WHITE EMBOSSED PANELS BUILDINGS 5 THRU 8&20 THRU 25 a-j?i SCHEME C ROOF BARKWOOD BROWN VINYL SIDING PEBBLESTONE CLAY 4"B. SIDING TRIM COLONIAL WHITE FISHSCALES VICTORIAN BLUE GREEN DOORS DARK FOREST GREEN WINDOWS VINYL CLAD WHITE BRICK WATSONVILLE(ROSE) GARAGE DOORS WHITE EMBOSSED PANELS � COMMUNITY BUILDING ROOF BARKWOOD BROWN SIDING DESERT TAN 4"BEVELED VIMYL TRIM COLONIAL WHITE BARNWOOD GRAYISH TONES IF AVAILABLE (OPTIONAL BRICK) OR (OPTIONAL SIDING) VINYL SHAKES STERLING GREY SHAKES WINDOWS WHITE VINYL RAILING&CAPS COLONIAL WHITE DECKING NATURAL YELLOW PINE(P.T.) DOORS DARK FOREST GREEN ANOD.ALUM. STONEWORK REDSTONE ENTRANCE TRELLIS COLONIAL WHITE (OPTIONAL) DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis July 25,2000 RECEIVED Marcia Banach,Director of Planning Town of South Windsor JUL 23 2000 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 RE:Wheeler Estates SRD/Subdivision SOg.tH WINDSOR PLANNRIG K?T• Smith Street South Windsor,CT Dear Marcia We are re-submitting 9 sets of plans for review for the above referenced project. The revisions include reconfiguring one of the buildings into two separate buildings,and revising the parking layout for the community building. We also made a number of revisions in response to comments by Jeff Folger. Please feel free to call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Galen Semprebon,P.E. Enclosures: MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: August 8, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates SRD We have reviewed the plans dated 7/24/00 for the proposed Wheeler Estates SRD and have the following comments: General 1. The comments below are not complete as the Topographic Plan (Sheet 3) is very difficult to read — we cannot differentiate sanitary laterals vs. contours vs. water connection vs. islands vs. edge of pavement, etc. It is difficult to determine the proposed grading vs. existing grading in the SRD area. Please have applicant revise this sheet. 2. The stormwater study will be reviewed and comments forwarded under a separate memorandum. 3. The sanitary sewer system must be revised. A town sewer (Wheeler Rd.) cannot flow into a private sewer (SRD area) and a private sewer cannot connect to another private sewer without an agreement in place. The existing system in Drake Court is private. 4. WPCA approval is required. Plot Plan — Sheet 3 1. The 3 entrances from the proposed private roads in the SRD onto Wheeler Road are unacceptable. A common road with one entrance onto Wheeler Road should be provided. 2. Intersection sight distance is not shown. Applicant should determine the 85tn percentile speed so that the required minimum intersection sight distance can be determined. 3. The north property line is in dispute. The applicant's surveyor must clear up this dispute and not just assume one line is more correct than another. Documentation should be provided and placed on the land records. 4. What is the angle of intersection with Smith Street? Standard is for minimum of 800 and maximum of 1000. 5. Road centerline data is not complete. 6. Kebalo Lane geometry doesn't appear to allow for a WB-50 vehicle. 7. The radius of the cul-de-sac pavement is not shown. 8. The sanitary sewer within the SRD area is private. 9. The drainage easement shown to be granted to the Town of South Windsor should be eliminated and a right to drain into the private drainage system should be granted. 10. Much information is printed upside down. 11. The utility and tree easements should be shown. Topographic Plan — Sheet 4 1. Sanitary sewer main and lateral information is missing (i.e., T.F., Inv., size, length of pipe, slope). 2. Catch basins should be placed on the proposed Wheeler Road at Smith Street. 3. Two (2) additional catch basins should be placed in the cul-de-sac at about station 6+00 in the gutter. -4. Roof leader outlets should show inverts at the dry wells. 5. The drainage outlet from the Community Hall should be placed in the detention basin. 6. Test pits should be provided within the proposed Wheeler Road roadway. 7. The plunge pool at the outlet from the detention basin should be placed at the bottom of the brook to avoid erosion of the slope. 8. Note 7 indicates that existing sanitary information was obtained from as-built plan "Smith Street— Wheeler Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements". However, the proposed sanitary main connects to a manhole provided from Redfield. There is no information on the plan showing sanitary sewer in Smith Street/Wheeler Road. 9. A chart is shown for units 1 to 25 but is not labeled. 10. The legend has no symbol for proposed sanitary manhole and pipe. Plan and Profile — Sheet 5 1. Plan does not show R.O.W., road centerline or pavement information. 2. Backwater valves will be required for footing drain outlets. 3. Inverts for footing drain outlet pipes at connection to the storm system should be shown. 4. Architectural drawings indicate that the SRD units have basements, however no footing drain pipes are shown. 5. Sanitary laterals for the SRD units are shown different from those at houses. 6. Sanitary sewer structure schedule indicates that top of frame elevations are plus or minus. These elevations should be exact. 7. Lot #1 shows a proposed paved parking area. Does this lot have a business? 8. The 100-foot vertical curve shown should be an angle point. 9. The profile ends at 6+00, however the road ends at 6+53.3. Please revise. Detail Sheet 1 — Sheet 7 1. Construction sequence should indicate that no stormwater shall be placed into the detention basin until the basin is fully stabilized. 2. Maintenance and operation notes indicate that a stone spillway exists, however none is shown on the drawings. 3. Typical sidewalk section should be the town standard sidewalk detail. 4. General notes #9 indicates 2:1 slopes maximum. This should be 3:1 slope maximum. Detail Sheet 2 — Sheet 8 1. Public pavement cross section detail indicates a 5-foot sidewalk, town standard is a 4' sidewalk. 2. Detail required for roadway cross section in SRD areas. 3. Concrete sidewalk handicap ramp detail does not give sufficient information. The Town's standard details should be shown. JCl/sfg cc: Jeffrey H. Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer \\TOWN_HALL\VOL2\ENGINEER\Prof.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Wheeler Est\Review 8-8.doc MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Plannin From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: August 9, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates SRD We have reviewed the Stormwater Management Plan dated June 15, 2000 for the proposed Wheeler Estates SRD and have the following comments: General 1. The plans for Wheeler Estates have been revised since this Stormwater Management Plan was prepared. A revised Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted. 2. Roof drainage for units 13 to 19 have not been addressed on plans. Infiltration Basin Design+- 1. The summary of the hydroflow hydrographs for the drywells is incomplete (Appendix I) information was only provided for"Building #6". 2. Soil conditions for drywell #5 do not appear favorable for infiltration. 3. It appears that the depth of drywell #2 would put the bottom of the structure into the water table. Detention Basin Design The drainage area for this development appears to lie in the upper reaches of the Plum Gulley Brook drainage basin. Town topographic maps indicate that a pond exists just downstream from the site. Applicant should investigate the need for a detention basin and whether a siltation basin or"Howland Swale"would be more appropriate. On Site Storm Sewer 1. Gutter flow analysis is required. 2. Hydraulic analysis is not correct after pipe run from CB8 to CB9. Also our standard design sheet should be used. 3. A water surface analysis should be generated for the storm drainage system. JCl/sfg S:\ENGINEER\Prof.-P&z Wetland Applications\Wheeler Est\Review 8-9.doc DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers • planners • surveyors • gis August 28, 2000 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 Attn:Marcia Banach Director of Planning RE: Wheeler Estates, 00-28P DPI Proj. #595 Dear Marcia We are submitting revised plans in response to comments made by Jerry Iazzetta dated 8-8-00, and 8-9-00, and by Jeff Folger dated 8-7-00, 8-8-00,and 8-9-00. Our like numbered responses to their comments are as follows: Jeff Folger's comments of 8-7-00 A detail of the proposed detention basin has been added to the detail sheet. Jeff Folger's comments of 8-8-00 The town's requirements for site development state that there will not be any increase in runoff from the site. When we reviewed the drainage from the site,we determined that there would be an increase in peak runoff from the site due to the development of the site, and therefore have included a detention basin in the site design. In looking at the comparative times for discharge of detention basin, such as ours verses Redfields,the entire drainage basin that the receiving stream serves would need to be investigated. This would require a watershed analysis of the entire basin which is beyond the scope and requirements for any particular site development. In addition,to the entire watershed basin being investigated,a watershed management plan would need to be completed to determine the needs of the watershed. After these two components have been completed, could recommendations be made as to the timing of basin discharges. In other words, without a watershed management plan,there is no available information that indicates at what time would it be most advantageous to discharge storm runoff from our site verses the Redfield site. Jeff Folger's comments of 8-9-00 We have included a double row of silt fence and staked haybales on the down slope side of the site to help protect the wetlands. It would be impractical to install a berm in this area, and would tend to lead to problems with drainage around the foundations and units in the future. Jerry Iazzetta's comments dated 8-8-00: General 1. The topographic plan has been revised to be made more readable. 2. Stormwater report has been revised. 3. The concept for the sanitary sewer running from this site into the private sewer in the adjacent site has been reviewed on a preliminary level by the WPCA previously. 4. WPCA approval is required. r DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers . planners . surveyors . gis Plot Plan—Sheet 3 1. We revised the previous concept plan to provide for one entrance onto Wheeler road prior to the cul-de- sac, and two private drives onto the cul-de-sac. The towns subdivision regulations allow for up to 3 driveways onto a cul-de-sac,and do not preclude two private roadways from entering the cul-de-sac. The proposed site layout and site shape preclude an acceptable layout with only one entrance on the cul-de-sac. 2. The intersection sight distance have been added to the plan. A traffic report has been prepared and will be submitted addressing the sight line issue. 3. The north property line is not in dispute. The same property line was held for both the Redfield development and the Wheeler Estates development. 4. Smith street intersects with Wheeler at two different angles. The site roadway has been designed to be at 90 degree angle with the western leg of Smith street. 5. The road centerline data has been included on the plans. 6. Based on our template,a WB-50 truck can negotiate around Kebalo lane. 7. The radius of the cul-de-sac has been included on the plan. 8. The sanitary easement has been removed from the plans,and a right to discharge to the town added. 9. The drainage easement has been removed from the plans,and a right to discharge to the town added. 10. Upside down information has been flipped upright. 11. The utility and tree easements have been added to the plans. Topographic Plan—Sheet 4 1. Sanitary sewer and lateral tables added to this plan. 2. Smith Street in the vicinity of the proposed roadway is at a high spot. There will be very little runoff from Smith Street entering the site, and therefore no need for catch basins at this intersection. 3. Based on the gutter flow analysis,there is no need for these two catch basins. 4. Inverts at the drywells added. 5. There is a concern with putting the drainage from the community hall into the detention basin. When the basin is full,water backing up from the detention basin could cause the basement of the community hall to flood. 6. Additional test pits to be done prior to or as part of construction to confirm design of roadway,etc. 7. The plans have been revised accordingly. 8. The note was on original survey plans for the project. 9. The chart has been labeled. 10. Symbol added to legend. Plan and Profile—Sheet 5 1. Plan revised to contain information referenced. 2. Note added to state same. 3. Inverts shown on plan. 4. Footing drains shown on plan. 5. Sanitary laterals revised to be consistent. 6. Table revised accordingly. 7. Lot#1 contains the Kebalo electric buisiness. 8. Plan revised accordingly. 9. Plan revised accordingly. Details Sheet 1 —Sheet 7 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 • Fax: (860) 291-8757 f DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers • planners . surveyors . gis 1. Plan revised accordingly. 2. Plan revised accordingly. 3. Plan revised accordingly. 4. The interior slopes of the detention basin are proposed to be 2:1. Detail Sheet 2—Sheet 8 1. Plan revised accordingly. 2. Plan revised accordingly. 3. Plan revised accordingly. Jerry Iazzetta's comments dated 8-9-00: General 1. Once all comments are received, the overall Stormwater Management Plan will be revised. 2. A note has been added to the plans addressing this. Infiltration Basin Design 1. The missing pages are included herein. Please note that the building 2B-3A address both drywells 3 and 4. 2. Permeability samples were taken at all locations during the test pits: Mottling observed during the test pits was very questionable and to location, and do not appear to be substantiated based on the permeability sampling. Based on this,it appears that the actual water tables are lower than anticipated. The permeability calculations used in the analysis are very conservative based on the sampling. In addition, for conservative analysis,no infiltration was assumed out of the bottom of the drywells. 3. See response for#2 above. Detention Basin Design. See response to Jeff Folgers comments dated 8-8-00 above. On Site Storm Sewer 1. Gutter flow analysis for public road included herein. 2. Hydraulic analysis revised accordingly. 3. Water surface analysis provided for worst case location. Please note that the majority of the storm drainage on the site is 6-8 feet deep.. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 . Fax- (860) 291-8757 t MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: August 31, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates SRD We have reviewed the revised plans dated 8/24/00 for the proposed Wheeler Estates SRD and have the following comments: General 1. The sanitary sewer system must be revised. A town sewer (Wheeler Rd.) cannot flow into a private sewer (SRD area) and a private sewer cannot connect to another private sewer without an agreement in place. The existing system in Drake Court is private. Mr. Sempribon's letter of August 28, 2000, which was in reply to my August 8, 2000 memorandum, indicates that this has been previously reviewed by WPCA, however, this is not the case. 2. WPCA approval is required. 3. The name Kebalo Lane is not on the approved street name list. Plot Plan — Sheet 3 1. The 3 entrances from the proposed private roads in the SRD onto Wheeler Road are unacceptable. A common road with one entrance onto Wheeler Road should be provided. Attached is a sketch showing one possibility. 2. Intersection sight distance is not shown on this plan (shown on Sheet 4). Applicant should determine the 85t" percentile speed so that the required minimum intersection sight distance can be determined. 3. The north property line shows 2 different property lines. Notes indicate that the property line utilizing referenced drawings made in 1960 (reference #1) and in 1967 (referenced #3) was used to define the property line. However referenced #3 which is a map made in 1986 was not used for the property line to the north. Why were the older maps used? 4. Mr. Semprebon's letter of August 28, 2000 indicates that Smith Street intersects with Wheeler Road at 2 different angles and that the road was designed at a 900 angle with the western leg of Smith. What is the angle of intersection with the eastern leg of Smith? 5. Kebalo Lane geometry doesn't appear to allow for a WB-50 vehicle, according to our templates. U yej V�� } 6. Mr. Semprebon's letter of August 28, 2000 indicates that the drainage and sanitary easements have been removed and a right to discharge to the town was added. These rights to discharge are not shown on the plan. 7. There is a rectangle shown in the new road at about 3+ 60 to 5 + 05. What does this signify? 8. The tree easement should be shown. Topographic Plan — Sheet 4 1. Catch basins should be placed on the proposed Wheeler Road at Smith Street. 2. Two (2) additional catch basins should be placed in the cul-de-sac at about station 6+00 in the gutter. 3. Roof leader outlets should show inverts at the dry wells. 4. Test pits should be provided within the proposed Wheeler Road roadway as part of this application. 5. Note 7 indicates that existing sanitary information was obtained from as-built plan "Smith Street — Wheeler Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements". However, the proposed sanitary main connects to a manhole provided from Redfield. There is no information on this plan showing sanitary sewer in Smith Street/Wheeler Road. 6. The legends symbol for proposed sanitary manhole and pipe does not match the sanitary on the plan. 7. Roof leaders from units 13 to 19 are not addressed. 8. There is a note ""all ADS pipe to be rated N-12". Is it proposed to use this pipe or some other material. Please have applicant be specific. 9. The sanitary sewer near the detention basin is not shown connected to an existing system. Plan and Profile — Sheet 5 1. Profiles are required for Kebalo Lane, sanitary sewer mains to SRD's and storm sewer in private roads. 2. The centerline data for Kebalo Lane should be shown. 3. Is a business (Kibalo Electric) a permitted use in this subdivision? 4. Cleanouts are required for sanitary laterals for lots 5 & 6. 5. Existing Wheeler and Smith St. roadways should be shown. 6. Water connection for lot 6 and the subdivision is shown going toward Smith St., however the existing water main is not shown. 7. Roof leader pipes are not identified as to size and type of pipe. It is recommended that a minimum of 6" pipe be used. 8. Monuments and iron pins should be shown. 9. Proposed ROW should be shown darker. 10. Footing drains are not identified as to size and type pipe. When footing drains are combined with roof leaders 6" minimum is required, however it is recommended that 8" pipe be used where units 13 to 19 are concerned. 11. The note concerning backwater valves should indicate that the access for these valves shall be in accordance with the local building codes and shall not be allowed in catch basins. 12. There appears to be a possible conflict between the sanitary lateral for lot 4 and the storm sewer. Detail Sheet 1 — Sheet 7 1. General notes #9 indicates 2:1 slopes maximum. This should be 3:1 slope maximum. Detail Sheet 2 — Sheet 8 1. Public pavement cross section detail should indicate the same cross-section as the town's road. (i.e., 2" base pavement after October 15 and before April 15, etc.) 2. Concrete sidewalk handicap ramp detail is incomplete —the plan view showing slopes is not shown. JCl/sfg cc: Jeffrey H. Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer S:\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Wheeler Est\Review 8-31.doc Wheeler Estates Senior Residence Development PH 9-5-00 1. Request for a resubdivision, Special Exception and site plan approval to construct a six lot subdivision and a 25-unit Senior Residence Development on the northerly side of Smith Street. The subject site property is in the A-20 zone. The property is surrounded by Redfield Development to the west, A-20 and Buckland Gateway zoned to the e st and multi-family to the south. Qi�-c2 2. The applicant is proposing to create six conventional lots, approximately 20,000 square feet in size, with the seventh lot for the senior residence development. There is no open space proposed with this development and is subject to a fee in lieu of open space. In accordance with Section C.l.d, the applicant must provide the name of an appraiser for the Commissions approval and an appraisal of the land to determine the fee required. pa4 3. There are two existing houses that will be subdivided with this applipdion. The applicant is proposing new driveways for these houses off of K e. The house on the corner of Smith Street and the new ne, was approved as a two-family house in 1960's. It appears a business also operates from that residence. Upon review of the subdivision plan, a doublewide drive and new parking lot for 5-6 cars is shown for the corner lot. We have asked the applicant to provide information on how the Kebalo Electric legally operates out of the Smith Street house, as we have been unable to find any information in our files. In response, the applicant has submitted a request for a Temporary and conditional permit to be able to continue operations from this location. It should be noted however, we also have concerns with the parking lot expansion, the intended vehicles to be parked there, and buffering if necessary. 4. They are posing a public roa hat will intersect with Smith Street, opposite Wheel R d. priv to d ' e is p pose the end of the cul de sac to serv' e the } 5. The plans show a street tree easement as well as sidewalks on both side of the road The landscaping plans for the subdivision shows street trees. Karl Reichle has worked with the applicant's landscape architect and supports the trees proposed. 6. Public water and sewer are available to the site. WPCA approval is required for both the subdivision as well as the Senior Residence Development. 7. The Special Exception criteria for review of a SRD include: • traffic impacts will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood; • there will be minimal adverse effects on existing uses in the area; • surrounding property values will be conserved and the character of the neighborhood will not be unduly disrupted; • impacts will not be detrimental to the capacity of the present and proposed utilities, street, drainage system, sidewalks, and other elements of the infrastructure; • the land is physically suited to the proposed use and minimal adverse environmental impacts are created; • the SRD proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town Plan of Development; • the SRD proposal will help meet senior housing needs of South Windsor; • the location of the SRD facility is within reasonable proximity to community facilities or amenities which serve the needs of elderly residents, or is within reasonable proximity to indoor/outdoor activity centers, or is within close proximity to or contains permanent open space land; • the SRD facility has been designed to meet the needs of handicapped residents or visitors; • the architectural design is aesthetically pleasing and low profile 8. The proposed density is 4.25 units per net buildable acre; maximum 10 units per net buildable acre are allowed. The maximum number of units in a Senior Residence Development is 20 units, however an applicant can propose up to 25 when a 1,000 square foot community facility is proposed. Proposed impervious coverage is 31.5%; 60% allowed. Required parking is 1.5 spaces per unit, or 37.5 spaces; the applicant has provided 67 spaces, or 2.68 spaces per unit. It appears that all other zoning requirements are met. 9. There are regulated wetlands on this site. IWA/CC heard the application of September 6th and will be hearing the application again on September 22. They have requested additional information regarding the impacts proposed to the wetlands. 10. If this application is approved, it will bring the total SRD units approved up to 123. The maximum number of units that the Commission may approve is currently capped at 150. 11. If the development will have curbside refuse collection and recycling, a hold harmless agreement and permission to enter form will need to be provided to the Town to allow the refuse & recycling vehicles to enter the site. 12. The applicant submitted a traffic study which indicates that due to the volume of traffic the proposed development that there will be little impact existing roadway network. The traffic engineer identified site line issues both on the northerly and southerly side of Smith Street. It appears that clearing within the Town right of ay will provide fo• adequate site lines. � 1/ cam. 13. There is a 25' buffer requirement around the site perimeter, in addition to the yard setbacks. The eastern and northern portions of the site are treed areas, and shown to be preserved, however there appears to be some conflicts in the grading plan and the landscaping plan. Without specific knowledge of the types and sizes of the trees shown to remain, we have a concern that the trees will not adequately provide the buffer required. 14. The applicant has applied the provision, which allows a combined buffer. The regulation states, "Buffers may at the discretion of the Commission be coterminous with the yards, provided the combined yards and buffer are no less than 25 feet in width, site conditions support such (e.g. site is contiguous to open space, permanent buffers and/or mature vegetation) and large trees are saved or planted within the buffer." Staff recommends that the buffer e� Cg"i'nCj increased, in particular in the area where the property abuts the commercially zoned land. Cross-sections have been submitted to demonstrate the buffer. 15. The Human Services Department has provided a memorandum regarding the 5 provision of senior residence developments: (Read Val's Memo, attached) rkS 16. The Architecture and Design Review Board has reviewed the plans and was satisfied with the architectural plans and landscaping as presented. We recommend that the public hearing remain open until the Inland Wetlands commission has rendered a decision and the applicant has addressed the zoning issue on the existing house lot. If this application is approved, the Planning Dept. requests no additional approval conditions other than as already noted. ��� � � Q� � ��� �� �t�. u, �� �_. � ��',� �. �. �Ffr. ,? 1 ,r." f �� � _._. r. - .. ..__ _ C ]`j�- .J 'Y 44'�:..�; � � c..� I a 11 I I Ll I AAA j o ZS 1 i l d !I Q� G LIW LN j� P I fi t' 'I ii o4t IAt- i I - i i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Memo To: Planning Department From: Director of Adult& Senior Services Date: 09/12/00 Re: Senior Residence Development In response to your request for input from a Senior Services perspective concerning senior residence developments,please be advised as follows: 1. The population of people 55 years and up continues to increase and it is projected that by the year 2005 South Windsor will have approximately 5,298 people 55+years old. 2. Our department continues to receive inquiries about housing options in South Windsor from senior citizens, adult children looking to have their parent/parents move closer to them, and or other interested members of families looking at senior housing options. The number of inquiries about moderate priced independent senior housing development units has remained at approximately the same level as in previous years. We continue to receive calls about the availability of units in the current 55- over housing developments. Senior Residence Developments seem to continue to be well received by seniors and their families in the continuum of housing options. It is important to understand that a percentage of these seniors will have an increased impact on senior center use, social services,transportation,etc.,provided through our department. C.e V erie Ballard ADULT & SENIOR SERVICES + Robert C.Schechinger,Jr.ASLA 10 Front Street,The Turbine House Landscape Architect y P.O.Box 246,Collinsville,CT 06022-0246 Master Planning Telephone:(860)693- 1025 Urban Design Facsiiim�ilie:(860C)69933 -44832 / Construction Administration ZL OV/�U�rl/q� 1� Cam- T��� ��-�`✓T ��q?' � �2�/ATE �� ,�-�'���y��C� 207 .- - .r _... , -f�j.--.., , .. > _.. 4, ..�.. r ,..�.s��x,^•-�cs+:v`C:: .g--.f -s- 5`" :'''+�' General Site Plant List cG - '��` ��' J` cis? cY�c Key QuantityBotanical Name CommonAr— Name Size �1iTi4 Comments , Ee #75 Existing Site Plant Material; Fr . k, Ed #23 aiser Firs, Blue Spruce&Arborvita ' Existing Site Plant Material, Maple, Oak&Birch - 10 Ht' Transplant #9 Acer rubrum "Autumn Flame T #g �� 5'-201 1 Ht Transplant Autumn Flame Maple 3" - 3 1/2" Ca], B&B V Il. i l� Qrn V# 10 Que cus rubra N rthern Red Oak 3, - 3 1/2�� Cal. B &B s " #5 3 1/2 Cal. B&B Prunus sargentii - 1/2" Cal. Mh # 11 Sargent Cherry 2" -2 - B &B Malus hupehens' Tea Crabapple „ - 1/2" Cal. B &B Ac* # 11 Abies concolo 2 2 - 1/2" Cal. Pg** # 11 White Fir # 10 @ 12'- 15'Ht. B&B • i Picea gauca White Spruce B &B �7 Pn ��9 Pinus ni ra 1 �} To #21 Thu'a g Austrian Pine #,3 @ 12'- 15'Ht. B &B I occ dentalis Nigra Dark 5 - 6 Ht. B &B Shrubs: American Arborvitae 8'- 10'Ht. f� Rc #23 B &B Rhod endron catawbiense Catawba Rhododendron 2 - I t #2� Vib num trilobum American Cranber 4�� 30 Ht., 6'O.C. B &B R •� � Ile verticillata rybush 24 -30' Ht., 5' O.C. Cs #26 Winterberry Holly 24" -30"Ht., 6'O.C. Container C rnus sericea Redosier Dogwood 24 30 B &B ' Tm #42 axus x media "Densiformis,, " - " Ht., 5'O.C. Bt 4116 Spreading yew 18" -24" Ht. 5'O.C. B &B Ig #34 Berberis thunbergii Japanese Barber O C B&B Ilex glabra "Shamrock" Ink �' 18" -24"Ht., 5'O.C. Container 1„ Vd #31 Viburnum dentatum berry Holly 24" -30" Ht., 6'O,C. "J RP # 16 Arrowwood Viburnum 24" -30" Ht. 6' B &B Rhododendron 'PJM' PJM Rhododendron , , O.C. B &B Rcc #22 Rhododendron carolinianum 24" -30" Ht. 5 O.C. 'Pm #3 Carolina Rhododendron 24" - 30" Ht., G'O.C. B &B Pinus mugo 'Mughus' Mugo Pine „ _ B &B Jcs # 4 Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 24 30 Ht., 5'O.C. Jcp 35 Sea Green Juniper 2 2- 1/2" Cal. 6 O.C. B &B Sea c. Pfitzerana Glauca' - B&B Gro, d Cover: Blue Pfitzers Juniper 2 2 - 1/2" Cal., 6 O.C. C #34 B &B Cotoneaster dammeri 'Coral Beauty' Coral Bueaty Cotoneaster 18" -24" S d. 3' #6 Juniperus horizont. "Bar Harbor Bar-Harbor Juniper• �E , #300 p O.C. Container Hedra helix'Baltica" p 18 , 24 Spd., 5 O.C. Container Ec # 170 Euonymous fortunei 'Colorata English Ivy 2 Yr. Root, 12" O.C. Hs #300 Purple-Leaf Winter Creeper 2 Yr. Root, '18" O.0 Flats Hemerocallis speciosa Daylilly Flats 1 -A yes conco or r 5'- 6'Ht., ocate outs e o et ac Bu er Areas. 12" Ht., 18" O.C. ** # 8 -Picea Glauca @ 5'- 6'Ht., located outside of Setback Buffer Areas. Container„` Oil n OTHERWISE NOTED t vic 11 z N`- ^; SHOWN, ARE BASED i)Iv n REVISIONS \� n VAII Ar?I i `'' ""A T!ON. ALL EXIST;N(• UTILITIES MEMORANDUM To:.South Windsor Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission. From: Jeffrey H. Folger—Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer Date: September 27, 2000 Re: Review of the proposed Wheeler Estates subdivision. Plans dated 9/25/00. 1. Details have been added to the plan depicting the temporary outfall protection for the detention basin, and plantings for the detention basin. Both are acceptable. 2. The outlet from the detention should be relocated to avoid the removal of a copse of large oaks. The area between wetland flag numbers 10 and 11 would avoid the trees and provide a stable area for the outlet pipe and energy dissipater. 3. The appropriate 80-foot upland review area has been shown on the plans. 4. The proposed community center location is shown accurately in relation to the existing tree line. Approximately 8 trees would have to be removed in order to accommodate the activity center. I don't feel that the removal of these trees would constitute a significant impact to the wetland area or to the integrity of the corridor given the amount of plantings proposed. I would recommend the addition of evergreens such as upright junipers in the understory edge to add an additional layer to the habitat. If the proposed gazebo and trails are approved as shown, any clearing to accommodate them should be minimal and be allowed to naturalize after installation. A wood chip surface should be considered. C ould recommend that a bond $5000.00 be placed to ensure installation and maintenance of n controls and a bond of$5000.00 for the construction and planting of the detention basin. The to be held for one growing season after planting. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. RECEIVI t civil engineers .planners surveyors is OCT 23 2009 October 23,2000 Town of South Windsor SOUTH IVIf ptI �Ca 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn:Marcia Banach Director of Planning RE:Wheeler Estates,00-28P DPI Proj.#595 Dear Marcia We resubmitted plans on Friday(10-20-00)in response to comments made by Jerry Iazzetta as contained in his memo dated 8-31-00. Our like numbered responses to Jerry's comments areas follows: General 1. The issue of the private sanitary sewer being utilized by our development is being addressed. 2. WPCA approval is required. 3. The project roadway is a private roadway. Plot Plan—Sheet 3 1. We revised the plan to provide for one entrance onto Wheeler road prior to the cul-de-sac,and one private drive onto the cul-de-sac. 2. The intersection sight distances have been added to the plan. 3. The north property line is not in dispute. The same property line was held for both the Redfield development and the Wheeler Estates development. The property line from the earlier surveys was held because it was the correct property line. The later survey missed a critical monument in the field,that was held as part of the earlier surveys,and subsequently the later surveys for the Redfield development. 4. Smith Street intersects with Wheeler at two different angles. The site roadway has been designed to be at 90-degree angle with the western leg of Smith Street,and to line up with the existing Wheeler roadway alignment. 5. The plans have been revised to allow for a WB-50 truck to negotiate around Kebalo lane. 6. The rights to discharge are included on the plans as notes. 7. The rectangle shown on the plans is an existing barn. It has been labeled as such. 8. The tree easement is shown on the plans. Topographic Plan—Sheet 4 1. A catch basin has been added at the intersection of Wheeler and Smith to augment the existing catch basin at this intersection. 2. The cul-de-sac has been revised to include two catch basins within the cul-de-sac. 3. The drywell table includes inverts of the roof leaders. 4. Test pits to be completed within the roadway prior to construction. Based on the type of soils in the area, and the owner's experiences,we do not anticipate any problems with the native soils for construction. 5. The existing utilities have been shown in wheeler and Smith Street. 6. The plans have been revised accordingly. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis 7. A note has been added to the plans addressing tying in the roof leaders for units 13-19. 8. The plans have been revised to specifically call for ADS n-12 pipe. 9. The existing sanitary manhole has been shown on the plan. Plan and Profile—Sheet 5 1. Plan revised to contain information referenced. 2. Plan revised accordingly. 3. A land use application for the business has been submitted. 4. Cleanouts have been added for lots 5&6. 5. Plans revised accordingly. 6. Plans revised accordingly. 7. Note added to plans to define sizes. 8. Plans revised accordingly. 9. Plans revised accordingly. 10. Note added to plans to define sizes. 11. Note added to plans regarding backwater valves. 12. Plans revised to insure adequate separation. Detail Sheet 1—Sheet 7 1. The interior slopes of the detention basin are proposed to be 2:1. All other slopes are 3:1 minimum. Note revised accordingly. Detail Sheet 2—Sheet 8 1. Plan revised accordingly. 2. Plan revised accordingly. We have included herein,revised drainage calculations for the revised catch basins. Please review the revised plans,and feel free to call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, 2Galenemprebon,P.E. CC:Jerry Iazzetta Enclosure 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 .Fax: (860) 291-8757 a PROJECT 4- no-Lid STREET mill BE-1.1111NE111. million ��111111111iIIIIIIIII W31SAS NI logo �oE1E���lIE�l111111�1 MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: October 25, 2000 Re: Wheeler Estates SRD We have reviewed the revised plans dated 10/20/00 for the proposed Wheeler Estates SRD and have the following comments: General 1. The sanitary sewer system must be reviewed by WPCA as a town sewer is flowing into a private sewer. 4-2. The name Kebalo Lane is not on the approved street name list. 3. The Smith Street streetline along the frontage of this project should be established in deed and monuments provided. 4. Revised gutter flow analysis is required. Plot Plan — Sheet 3 +*1. It is indicated that a pedestrian walkway is to be striped on the roadway rather than a sidewalk being provided. 2. Using the templates we have, it appears that a WB-50 vehicle cannot negotiate Kebalo Lane. 3. The street tree easement should be shown and identified. 4. A monument is required along the Smith Street ROW line at Wheeler Road and its coordinates shown. 5. The radius of the new Wheeler Road at Smith Street should be increased as a bus or a WB-50 vehicle cannot make a right turn out of this subdivision onto Smith Street. 6. The widths of Kebalo Lane roadway are not shown. 7. The width of the opening from the cul-de-sac to Kebalo Lane is not shown. t 8. Note indicates that bituminous concrete sidewalks are proposed within the SRD. Portland Cement sidewalks, as per our Public Improvement Specifications, should be provided. 9. The opening into units 1 to 4 off of Wheeler Road should be reconfigured to prevent vehicles from entering this one way roadway. 10. A"do not enter"sign should be placed at roadway to units 1 to 4 at Wheeler Road. 11. There are several locations where information is overlapped on other information making in unreadable. Topographic Plan — Sheet 4 1. An easement is needed for the storm pipe from C134 to CB6. 2. The sanitary lateral from Unit 25 is shown connected to lateral from Unit 24. This is unacceptable. 3. There are two notes"See Note 2"and "See Note 3"shown on the plan. However, there are no notes 2 or 3 shown on this sheet. 4. Why are specific existing trees shown on this plan and why are they so dark? Plan and Profile — Sheet 5 1. Grades at end of the cul-de-sac are not shown on profile. 2. The stationing of Kebalo Lane cannot be read. *r 3. The irrigation well on lot 5 should be capped. 4. The existing septic tank and leaching system on lot 4 should be removed. 5. There is a conflict between the sanitary lateral from lot 4 and the storm pipe. (Storm pipe invert 99.95, 6" Sanitary lateral invert 99.5) 6. The existing monument on Smith Street at the corner of lot 6 should be shown. 7. Coordinates of monuments should be shown. Detail Sheet 1 — Sheet 7 1. The details for catch basins and detention basin outlet do not follow Town Standards as corbelling is not allowed and some standard notes are not shown. Detail Sheet 2 — Sheet 8 1. Details for storm and sanitary trenches are required. 2. Detail for bituminous curb is not the town standard. Profile — Sheet 9 41. Grades for Kebalo Lane are not shown. 2. Points of intersection not shown. 3. Vertical curves not shown. JCl/jsv cc: Jeffrey H. Folger, Environmental Planner/Conservation Officer S:\ENGINEER\Prof.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Wheeler Est\Review 10-20 doc DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis October 30,2000 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor,CT 06074 Attn:Marcia Banach Director of Planning RE:Wheeler Estates,00-28P DPI Pro.#595 Dear Marcia We are writing in response to comments made by Jerry Iazzetta as contained in his memo dated 10-25-00. We have not attempted to rush a revised set of plans due to the limited time between this memo and the next P&Z hearing. The comments as contained in Jerry's memo are by and large relatively minor,and can be made a condition of approval. There are 1 or 2 specific items that will need to be worked out at the P&Z hearing. Our like numbered responses to Jerry's comments are as follows: General 1. We have submitted an application to the WPCA. 2. The project roadway is a private roadway. 3. The Smith Street street-line will be established in deed,and monuments provided. 4. A revised gutter flow analysis will be provided. Plot Plan—Sheet 3 1. As part of the revisions to the plans,sidewalks are proposed on the north side of the site. To augment the sidewalks,a striped pedestrian zone is proposed within the pavement on the south side. The traffic volumes within this development will be very low,and localized. 2. We have reviewed the access within Kebalo lane and believe that a WB-50 vehicle can negotiate the roadways. We will revise any locations that the Engineering Department feels is necessary. 3. The Street tree easement is shown on Wheeler Road. 4. A monument will be shown to be installed along the Smith Street ROW. 5. The radius on the corner of Wheeler Road and Smith Street will be increased. 6. The widths of Kebalo Lane will be shown on the final plans. The two direction sections are a minimum of 24'wide,and the single direction is 18'wide. 7. The width of the opening of Kebalo Lane at the cul-de-sac will be labeled on the final plans. 8. The sidewalks along Wheeler Road will be concrete per the public Improvement Specifications. The sidewalks within the SRD will be privately maintained,and as such,the owner would like to install Bituminous Concrete Sidewalks. 9. The entrance to units 1-4 off Wheeler Road will be reconfigured slightly to help prevent vehicles from mistakenly entering this drive. 10. A"Do Not Enter"sign will be installed at the Wheeler Road drive from units 1-4. 11. Any overlapping information will be corrected. Kebalo Lppl Description 91-595 Beginning at a point at the southwest comer of the property herein described;,said point being further marked by a monument,thence N 18,23' 36"E,along property nowor formerly of Jean Marc Jacques,a distance of A 176.96 feet to a mere stone;thence S 67° IV 19'E.along property now or formerly of the Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford,Inc,a distance of 454.70 feet to a point; thence S 1$'51>58"W,along property now or formerly of said Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Archdiocese of Hartford,Inc,a distance of 449.81 feet to an iron pin in a mere stone;thence S 180 S I' S8„W,along.property now or formerly of Margaret R.Frmrk a distance of 639:86 feet to a mere stone;thence N 86°467 02"W,along the northerly street line of Smith Street,a distance of 276:70 feet to a point;thence N 65,16'32"W along the northerly street line of Smith Street,a distance of 178.40 feet to a monument,said monument being the point and place of beginning. OCT.31.2000 4:44PM CUMMINGS & LANZA LLceGO6443347 NO.693 P.1i1 LAW 011RIfCES CUIWMYNGS,LANZA AND PURNHAGEN,L.L.C. 1610 ELL DON ROAD POST OFFICE BOX 667 SOUTH WINDSO&CONN.060744667 (860)644.3473 FAX(S60)644-3M47 HAROLD R.CUMMINGS EO►+PARO A.KUEHN MICHAEL J.LANZA OF COUNSEL VINCENTJ.PURNHAGEN October 31, 2000 Via Facsimile and First Glass Mail Fav#644-7280 Marsha Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 , In Re: Application 00-28 P Wheeler Estates Resubdivision and Special Exception Applications Dear Marsha: On behalf of my client, K.F. Properties, L.L.C., r respectfully request a thirty(30)day extension of the time period for the Planning and Zoning Commission to conclude its public hearing on my client's application and also, to conclude its deliberations with respect to the above applications. S� you, Cummings 8� anza rney for K.F. Properties, L.L.C. HRC/ss cc: Walter Kebalo Joseph Lumka, CPA Peter DeMallie a r ��OwN BF�t� C � 6 0-*FeS10U& ?40&1,"�Ot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co��'v AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 November 15, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir/Madam: Re: App100-28P, Wheeler Estates Resudivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on October 31, 2000, to approve with modifications application #00-28P, Resubdivision on 7.6 acres to create 7 lots to be known as Wheeler Estates on property located on Smith St., A-20 zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., project #95-845 and dated 10/20/00, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for 7 lots,numbered 1-6, and Parcel A for the Senior Residence Development. 2. Concrete sidewalks,built to Town specifications, shall be installed on both sides of all new streets. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 6. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Chief of Police. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police (copy enclosed). 7. Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured,with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 9_) This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission,including a bond in the amount of$5,000 for erosion and sediment control, and$5,000 for detention basin plantings. 10. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 11. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 1 a f2)All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision,must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 13. Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" =40', shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. 14. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed,the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding. All bonds shall conform to the enclosed bond policy and shall be posted prior to filing the final plans in the Town Clerk's office. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. (16 A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$300.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 7. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. ). . Engineering comments dated 10/25/2000 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. Sight line clearing is required along Smith Street in accordance with the recommendations in the traffic report prepared by Bubaris Traffic Associates. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets#3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations)must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission,must be reproduced on the mylars. After mylars have been signed by the Commission,they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk by 2/17/01. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Enclosures cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor C0fi �4awM sf�� `8 C , r T-Own aic soatA Vt • u s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-Co��,w AREA CODE 860/ 644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL November 15,2000 K.F.Properties,LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Appl#00-28P, Wheeler Estates SRD Special Exception and Site Plan We are pleased to advise you that the Planning &Zoning Commission voted on October 31, 2000, to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Special Exception to Section 4.1.12and Site Plan of Development. This approval is for the construction of a 25 unit senior residence development on property located 176 and 188 Smith Street, A-20 one as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals,Inc., Job No. 95-845, dated 10/20/00, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work; a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 03 This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$5,000 for erosion and sediment control and$5,000 for detention basin plantings. 4. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. Footing drains are required if the buildings have basements. A landscape bond in the amount of$10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. WPCA approval is required. 9. The building street numbers must be included on the final plan. 10. The sidewalks must be concrete, must be separated from the street, and must extend to buildings. 11. Engineering comments dated 10/25/00 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 12. Topographic plan must show the proposed tree line, which must be in agreement with the landscaping plan. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet#3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the eritire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. L The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. Very truly yours, t Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf Enclosures cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal I, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission,hereby certify that on October 31, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to K.F. Properties (Wheeler Estates) a Special Exception to Article 4.1.12 of the Zoning Regulations and Resubdivision for a senior residence development on property located at 176 & 188 Smith Street as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals,Inc., Project No. 95-845. Assessor's Map and Parcel Number: Map#17 Parcels#1&2 More particularly bounded and described as follows: See attached OWNER OF RECORD: Paul Kebalo and Helen Kebalo Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 15th day of November. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of ,20 , at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: r 7 � DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis To: Marcia Banach, Planning Director November 20, 2000 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Wheeler Estates Subdivision DPI Project No. 91-595 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut On behalf of my client, K.F. Properties, L.L.C., I hereby request a 90 day extension from the original filing date for recording the mylars in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank you. DESIGN PR ESSIONALS, INC. By: Peter R. DeMallie Principal Cc: Walter Kebalo Harold Cummings, Esq. Galen B. Semprebon, P.E. � a r f1 i;ate 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 •Fax: (860) 291-8757 November 20,2000 Mr.Peter DeMallie Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Rd. South Windsor,CT 06074 RE: Approval to connect—Wheeler Estates—Senior Residence Development Dear Mr.DeMallie: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority,at its regular meeting of November 8,2000,gave approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a residential,senior residence development located on Wheeler Road and Smith Street,as more specifically shown on plans entitled"Wheeler Estates and Wheeler Estates SRD"prepared by Design Professionals,Project No. 595,Drawing No(s).595 dated 6-9-2000 with revisions 7-24-00,8-24-00,9-25-00, 10-9-00, 10-20-00 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. 2. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff,and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority,and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. 3. Conditional approval was given and final approval will be granted when a legal opinion from the Town Attorney,regarding a public sewer draining into a private line is obtained. 4. A document is provided to the WPCA to protect the Town in the event a blockage of the line were to occur,on the section of the sewer line which is privately owned,stating the responsibility of risk would be on the developer. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, Thomas Hindson,Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority TH:dd CC: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager Michael J.Gantick,Director of Public Works Jerry Iazzetta,Town Engineer Marcia Banach,Director of Planning John Collins,Chief Building Inspector K.F.Properties,L.L.C. WPCA Robert Lugh,Plant Supervisor DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis To: Marcia Banach, Planning Director December 5, 2000 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Wheeler Estates Subdivision DPI Project No. 91-595 Smith Street South Windsor, Connecticut On behalf of my client, K.F. Properties, L.L.C., I hereby request a second 90 day extension from the original filing date for recording the mylars in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank you. DESIGN PROF e SSIONALS, INC. By: ' Peter R. DMallie Principal cc: Walter Kebalo Harold Cummings, Esq. Galen B. Semprebon, P.E. ` c � 0`k �p a\ 0 4 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 • Fax: (860) 291-8757 A I �4011N ef,` Town O-P Sloaz% U s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-c AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 December 19, 2000 K.F. Properties, LLC 176 Smith Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Appl #00-28P, Wheeler Estates SRD Special Exception and Site Plan Please be advised that the Planning &Zoning Commission voted on December 19, 2000, to grant a 90-day extension for filing subdivision plans for the above-referenced subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The original filing deadline was 2/17/01; the new filing deadline is 5/18/01. State statutes authorize one additional 90-day filing extension. If you wish to request an additional extension, please request in writing prior to that date. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf L 13OND MLtkSE TRANSMITTAL DATE: d b CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER • . NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS {� LOT P&Z' OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER. -�-� SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 2 2— ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT 3, Please release the--bond indicated above as a, , CLInCL FyC0./i S T2r. At( =F eye% ,n It eu. 6 . . n S a cA . .NAME DATE . CHECK It ISSUED 6 BY DATE S:\ENGINEER\E'DRMS\Office Forms\BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL.doc