Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-53P Watson Farm Spec Exc/Site Plan U TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING&ZONING CO I c o w N s eQ , APPLICATION FO E I V E ly �f Application No: _�__`) -S? ` Official Receipt Date: NOV 3 2000 Receipt No: APPLICANT: alt Group, LTD. SOUTH WINDSOD PLAta�1dP�G DfP�. SOR Co � ADDRESS: 10 Executive Drive, Farmington, CT 06032 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: South Windsor Housing Authority/Edward & Audrey Smith ADDRESS: JL40 Sul I n Avenue; Smith•700 Deming Street, South Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: North side of Demi ncr r Pt 40 ranP) ASSESSOR'S MAP # 11 �_ PARCEL # 7 ZONE—RR NAME; ADDRESS, TEL& FAX# OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Peter R. DeMallie Principal, Design Professionals In Road S r,CT 06074 T 1 291-8755• Fax. 291-8757 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply): ❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Subdivision ❑Minor ❑ Major ❑ Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) ❑ Minor ❑ Major ❑ Conditional Approval ® Special Exception to Article 4.1.11 (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required) ❑ Site Plan of Development ❑ General Plan of Development ❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required) ❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment) Temporary and Conditional Permit for El Major Home Occupation for El Other (explain in detail) An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days prior to being heard by the Commission. Signature Applicant "1� lCtr'r� ature of perry Owner (See reverse side for additional information) "7 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS APPLICANT_TH C kj&TE PROJECT NAME rj P-Ts,G Q r1� This checklist must be signed by plan preparer(P.EJLS.) declaring that all'required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplied. �! 1. On each sheet for plans or ma p ps, title block with the following information: . / a. Name, address and telephone of applicant V b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. c.- Name of Development d. Date when drawings were made. v 2. Ke a : An overall'ma ----.- P p drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals either 100 feet or 2A fee This map will show the overall design of the Development and / surrounding property within 500 feet a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Outline of buildings. V/ c. Layout of streets. d. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500 feet. V e. Names of abuttingproperty p petty owners. f. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. g. Driveway cuts on abutting properties and any properties across from `/ proposed site. h. Distanc e to and name of nearest intersection street V 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklis t for Architecture and Design Review, V/ 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a s e of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets �l) 24" x 36; ith a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: - - a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking spaces. c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside fighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened). g g g� e. Easements, not grantors, grantees, and purpose. f. Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at comers and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. The monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these CGS points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. L� h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated --" i. A-2 certification- P.E. LS. se als eats and signatures. S. -Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to40 feet on sheets not exceeding-24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to / the requirements of the plot plans show the following: v a. All existing andproposed buildings. b. Curb Lines and pavement width sidewalk s. lcs. c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers. d. Existing and proposed water and-all existing'utilities. e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any trees to be saved should be shown. f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one- foot intervals and spot elevations. 9 . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are f•` present ,y h• Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes and elevations of structures. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches,within Town ROW.) If plan/profile sheet is provided all of this does not need to be shown., Only top of frame elevations and inverts of open discharge pipe shall be shown on this plan. L connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as / needed. g V ' j. Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 &T 2 Certification; P.E. L.S./ seals and signatures. / 6. Landscaping plan: v . 7. Drainage calculations: -Zero Runoff Increase r attached per guidelines.delines. 8. Traffic Report: 9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposedstreets drawn plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feetorizzntally, and nch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. b. Street plan showing roadways, drainage, sanitary sewer (including house sewer), foundation drains, lot lines, buildings including all utilities with elevations(top flame and inverts), size, type, length, slopes of pipes. C. Sight line at driveway&street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations, sizes, lengths and slopes of pipes. 1 1 f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g. CGS datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls. The Town Engineer shall, based on'standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, inverts, top of frame, sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which 10. Open Sp t p require or indude a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet �. Pr 11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems. p� -PLAN PREPARER P. /--L.S'. pA June 23, 191A TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR SURETY FORM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING/EROSION CONTROL/SITE BONDS Project: WgfSor-% FQrw► I,this day,deposited with the Town of South Windsor,a check in the name of the Town of South Windsor in the amount of$5,!� oco.oa as surety to secure the performance by V��tson r1P,,,,, Assoc;atcs L•P. of certain subdivision/erosion control/landscaping/site requirements in the construction of. 72 (1,,,fs (Application Name,Address,Phone) Wad-, Far,•►., Assoc a+es (o �xecatw2 �r�Jer C-T 0(o®32 Prepared By: (Design Firm,Map references, commission approval dates) It is a condition of the surety that a) If such performance is not completed to the satisfaction of the Town of South Windsor,then said town will be entitled to have any and all required work properly completed and will be entitled to withdraw funds sufficient to cover the cost thereof. b) If and when such performance is to the satisfaction of the town,the town will return to (Assaci cj+ L. F, -the balance of the funds remaining together with a release of all right that the town may have. c) That the amount of the bond be forfeited to the Town of South Windsor if all improvements subject thereto have not been completed to the satisfaction of the Town within five years from the date of approval.The Town of South Windsor will use the forfeited funds to complete the required work. (j Wdfbbr, CtrvN RS oC+1 clf GS Li .v.l+g� PGr�r.eiS��P i —Print Name o re_y sae& m� IN WITNESS WHEREOAk)a,-r , ,o--� ' P t.d-<z_has caused this instrum t his t\ day ofs � `Z-tack TOWN USE ONLY Received By — Date Sub account # W9 Form submitted Released on 813100 J PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Thomas Field, Bill Lanning, John Bond, Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mel Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula, Jerry Iazzetta FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning 14� The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: \ P P gP J Jk S 3 r- Location: ks.,��, Site Plan 0 Subdivision No. Acres Zone 0 Industrial 0 Commercial residential No. Lots/Units 7,)-- Water: APublic 0 Private Well Sewerage: 0,Public 0 Septic system(s) Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? O Yes C(No O new street(s) O new detention area 0 new open space/recreation area 0 active O passive Planning Department notes: Please comment by and return to the Planning Department. W) 1 c 4D - &mod 1 ' Development Profile Watson Farm Elderly Housing ' 700 Deming Street South Windsor, Connecticut 1 ' THE METRO REALTY GROUP LTD 10 EXECUTIVE DRIVE FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06032 ' December 18, 2000 Mr. John Radacsi The State of Connecticut ' Office of Policy and Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1308 Re: Watson Farm Development Address: 700 Deming Street, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 ' Census Tract: 4872 Dear Mr. Radacsi: ' The zoning and land use patterns in the vicinity of the proposed development are diverse. The immediate adjacent land uses are an active adult(55+) fee simple ownership development known ' as "Porter Share", located to the South of the Development. To the North of the Development is a 40 unit farmers home elderly housing complex know as "Flax Hill". Beyond those two uses are some single family homes. The general area is dominated by the Buckland Hill Mall and all of the surrounding retail, hotel and other commercial and multifamily uses. Every retail use imaginable ' is located within very close proximity to the site. We are proposing a senior housing community on approximately 7 acres of land on Route 30 in ' South Windsor bordering Manchester on land donated to the South Windsor Housing Authority by Mrs.Lois Watson for the express purpose of the construction of senior housing and on a former residence of Edward and Audrey Smith. All zoning and land use approvals are in place. ' The Town of South Windsor and the South Windsor Housing Authority have been very supportive of our development efforts due to the great need for affordable senior housing in the Town of South Windsor. The proposed development qualified as affordable senior housing and is intended to be financed through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority("CHFA"). We will also be seeking an ' allocation of low-income housing tax credits from the CHFA. The rents charged for the apartment units will be affordable to persons earning not more than 60% of the Hartford PMSA income levels adjusted on a presumed family size of 1.5 persons for a one bedroom unit and three ' persons for two bedroom unit. With the exception of 14 market rate units, incomes for the occupants residing at the remaining 58 units is limited to 60% of the Hartford PMSA family income levels adjusted based upon family size. All of the foregoing will be memorialized in a covenant recorded on the land records and will stay in place for at least thirty(30)years. At the ' outset, I would like to spend a couple of moments defining the senior housing market as we see it. THE SENIOR ' MARKET WE HAVE IDENTIFIED "Our goal is to improve the quality of life for active seniors, as they age in place, on ' fixed or limited incomes" WATSON FARM ADULT HOUSING PROPOSAL 1 As a general proposition, seniors have a very strong desire to remain living independently for as ' long as they can. No one wants to live in a nursing home or for that matter live in any institutional environment. Even assisted living, as nice as these buildings are, and many look like first class hotels,people would rather not live there-these facilities tend to be "need driven". ' Residents who live in these facilities live there because they need assistance with the activities of daily living. ' Our objective is to fulfill the desire of most people to live independently as long as possible by providing them with an environment that removes many of the barriers to living independently. Our development eliminates staircases and incorporates numerous design features catering to ' needs of seniors; every unit is handicap accessible, residents don't face the physical or financial burden of maintaining a single family home, and perhaps most importantly we offer an affordable environment that allows socialization. By bringing together a senior community, seniors can interact easily on a daily basis and we remove the isolation that many seniors feel living in ' conventional single family neighborhoods with a lot of younger families whose interests may be quite different. The lifestyle offered at Watson Farm offers seniors a secure living environment with fewer responsibilities than a single family home. Our company, The Metro Realty Group, Ltd., is not a service company—we know little about health care or how to provide meals—our business is providing shelter to seniors ' capable of independent living. From a policy standpoint for the State of Connecticut, by allowing seniors to live affordably and independently longer, the State will have a reduced nursing home population. The correlation is not readily apparent, but studies ' have proven that up to 20% of the population in nursing homes, does not need to be in nursing homes since they are not in need of round the clock skilled nursing. Many such residents are frail and could live with home health care and help from relatives, but can ' not find an affordable alternative to their needs since the waiting lists at most senior apartment complexes is several years long. This correlation becomes more apparent when you look at development such as Whispering Pines I in Avon where the median age ' of residents living in those senior apartments is 80. This is a perfect illustration of the phenomenon known as "aging in place" which is what we will achieve at Watson Farm. A real but depressing fact is that age and income are inversely related; as age increases, ' income decreases. In our demographic section below we note that when this development is ready for occupancy, there will be 1,200 persons 85+ and 3,000 people 75+ living in a 5 mile radius of this site, 65% of whom will be income qualified. Given ' that the Medicaid reimbursement rate in Connecticut exceeds $150 per bed per day, for each resident kept our of a nursing homes, the savings is $55,000 per year. Our goal is to improve the quality of life for seniors, as they age in place, on fixed or limited incomes. ' The Specifics of Our Plan Our basic concept is housing for persons 62+(no children), living in a maintenance free/ architectural barrier free environment, clustered in a community/village concept, centered on a ' village green. The development features single level living(no stairs)with one and two bedrooms with one bath, a kitchen, eating nook and living room. About 33% of the units are of the one bedroom variety and 67% of the units are of the two-bedroom variety. Our one bedroom ' 3 WATSON FARM ADULT HOUSING PROPOSAL ' unit is approximately 800 square feet and our two bedroom unit is 900+square feet,both about 25% -50% more floor space than typical senior housing. ' The buildings are constructed into the grade of the sloping land at the Watson Farm. By doing this we are able to stack two one story apartment flats on top of each other,with access to each ' individual unit from grade. As a result there are no stairs either interior or exterior to the unit. Hence, the front of the building is at a grade that is approximately 12' above the back of the building. The front of the buildings is a one-story elevation and the perspective from the back of the building visible from the interior of the development is a two-story building. The architectural ' style of the buildings is New England styled architecture with pitched roofs, fypon peaks over the windows and headers over windows and doors,maintenance free vinyl siding, architectural. ' roof shingles, large windows, wide corner boards and shutters. The landscaping in our developments is very attractive and in many ways defines our developments. Typically a patio and a white picket fence will be situated in front of every home. We often transplant trees in the 30' —50' range so that the landscaping at our developments is not just nursery stock. There is no pool, commercial space or dining facility that is part of this development. There is a community room,which will be in the area of 1,200 square feet for communal activities. The apartment units are constructed condominium style with individual entrances and no interior corridors. This avoids the feel of an institutional building. The colors of the buildings are chosen by interior decorators, so that the color schemes compliment each other; buildings, shutters and ' doors are mixed and matched with cheery pastel colors. Demographics ' We performed a demographic study for a 5-mile radius around the proposed site at Watson Farm, much of that radius would be located in South Windsor. ' We found the following: All of the following has been formulated by a demographic study commissioned by the Metro ' Realty Group, Ltd., for an area consisting of a five mile radius around the proposed site. 24.5% of the 2005 population will be 55+, and 13.8% of the 2005 population will 65+. So we extrapolate that 17% of the population in the market in question is 62+. Given that this group represents such a broad segment of the market, it is surprising that so little adult housing is being developed. Think for instance how much assisted living is under construction when that market segment of 80+represents only about 2% of the overall population. In any event, it is fair to say ' that we are in the very early stages of developing this type of housing, especially as our population ages and as the baby boomer population closes in on 62 in the several of years. ' The fastest growing segment of the overall population is the senior population and the fastest growing segment of the senior population is the 75+segment. The 1990 census found 5.2% of the population to be 75+and the projections for 2005 are 7.1% (a 36.5%increase), which is an ' increase of approximately 2,301 people within a 5 mile radius of this site. The 1990 census found 1.2% of the population to be 85+and the projections for 2004 are 1.9%, an increase of 58%or an increase of approximately 826 people within a 5-mile radius of this site. ' In the big picture, 113,800 persons live in a 5-mile radius of the site. By 2005, 18% of that population is 62+=20,484. Overall, 57% of the 62+population is women and that percentage increases as age increases. Based upon incomes, 29%of the overall population in a five mile ' radius is age and income qualified. This is 4,400 people. Our 72 units represents 1.6% of the age ' 4 WATSON FARM ADULT HOUSING PROPOSAL ' and income qualified population that lives in a five-mile radius. Hence we can only supply q p p � Y pP Y enough rental housing for 1.6% of the age and income qualified population living within a 5-mile ' radius. A depressing but statistically proven reality of aging is that age and income are inversely related such that as our population ages in this community, they have less money. ' Occupant Profiles Based on prior experience at rental and homeownership communities, we would predict the ' following: • 80%+will be fully retired, ' 0 60% +will be single(a few will be divorced, few will be men but the vast majority of this group is widows). ' • Age: 30%will be in their 60's; 60% in their 70's and 10% in their 80's. We see the following in the more long-term future. The first theme is the concept of aging in ' place. We believe that while the median age of our population is likely to be �a���— 0's ease- up, 10 years from now our median age is more likely to be approximately 80. This may seem irrelevant to our younger residents initially, but we must keep this in mind and design our units ' for a population that will ultimately be substantially older than the day they move in. We hope that the foregoing adequately conveys our development concept. We would be happy to ' meet with you to discuss this concept further. As stated above, our objective is to fulfill the desire of most people to live independently as long as possible by providing them with an environment that removes many of the barriers to living independently. In so doing,we ' hope to improve the quality of life for seniors, as they age in place,on fixed or limited incomes. ' Very truly yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. Geoffrey S er, Pre ' ent 1 5 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis ' December 21,2000 ' Mr. Geoffrey Sager,President The Metro Realty Group,Ltd. 10 Executive Drive ' Farmington,CT 06032 Dear Geoff: Re: Planning Report Watson Farm Route 30,Deming Street South Windsor,Connecticut DPI Proj.No.99-1270 The purpose of this report is to review the proposed Watson Farm elderly apartments,and the impact,if any,of it on area agricultural land and farming operations,and its relevance to the Connecticut Conservation Policies Plan. The subject 8.7 acre tract is being assembled from the Smith residence at 700 Deming Street(3.2 acres),and 5.5 acres from land of the South Windsor Housing Authority.The Smith family has resided at this address for some forty years,and have not farmed the land.The housing authority parcel is taken from an 18 acre property donated by Lois Watson to the Town,in the late eighties,for the express purpose of providing elderly housing.Approximately five acres of the eighteen was utilized for the Town's second publicly-subsidized elderly apartment complex,Flax Hill,which has some forty one-bedroom apartments ' and a three year waiting list of some ninety prospective tenants.It offers no two-bedroom units and thus does not meet the needs of the community's elderly couples.I understand the Watson land likewise has not been farmed for decades. The housing authority is pursuing a congregate care facility for the balance of the property. In order to understand the agricultural issue,it is best to first address any area parcels with existing or potential farmland,and how they are situated with respect to area land uses,and known or ' anticipated development. The only area agricultural parcels are the Foster Farm to the north,a dairy operation containing approximately 90 acres of pasture and cropland,and about 17 acres owned by Helen Krawski,to the ' northwest of the Foster Farm. To the north,east and west of the Foster/Krawski farmland are single- family subdivisions along Orchard Hill Drive,Avery Street and Foster Street.The Foster/Krawski farms have co-existed well with the abutting single-family residences. ' Starting from the southwest comer of the Foster Farm,and encompassing the area bounded oh the north by the farm,on the south by Route 30,on the west by Foster Street,and on the east by Avery Street,are the following existing or proposed land uses: i 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 • Fax: (860) 291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. ' civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis 1. The Flax Hill elderly apartment development(housing authority); 2. The future congregate housing development,on a site which is wetlands along the ' Foster Farm boundary,where the building can only be sited south of Flax Hill along Route 30(approximately 3f developable acres of the 7+acre parcel).This development is being pursued by the municipality, ' 3. The Watson Farm site,which,like the other properties west and easterly of it,is down- gradient of the farm.This 8.7 acre property includes wetlands on the west side,a cross- country public sewer line,the Smith residence surrounded by mature forest,and a small meadow/forested area.A defined deciduous hedgerow,uphill from the Watson Farm development,includes an old stonewall in disrepair.The Watson Farm layout depicts four elderly apartment buildings containing 18 units in each,or 72 total,and a community hall. Some two-thirds of the apartments will be two-bedroom,meeting the community need for larger below-market rental elderly apartments.The development will be separated from the Foster Farm through buffer plantings,grade separations and preservation of an expanded hedgerow. The closest building is more than 75 feet from the farm boundary; ' 4. To the east of Watson Farm,with buildings as little as 25 feet from the common property line separating it from the Foster Farm's cornfield,is Porter's Share elderly condominium; ' 5. Easterly of Porter's Share is the relatively new Church of the Living God,with the house of worship abutting the farm,and a large 200 car parking lot southerly of the building. A major sanctuary addition is planned; ' 6. Between the church and Avery Street is a proposed development consisting of an additional 300 parking spaces for the growing church(adjacent to Foster Farm),and an intensive retail development along Route 30.The retail zone change was recently ' approved,and a site plan application is being prepared at time of writing.This is very real,in that the church has engaged my firm to design the parking lot,and we are interfacing with the retail developer's engineers.They are in the process of signing up ' national chain tenants. Aside from the six developments noted above,and the full single-family residential development ' surrounding the Foster Farm on the east,north,and west,is the huge Buckland Hills commercial area beginning some 500f feet easterly of the Watson Farm entrance drive.Diagonally opposite Watson Farm and on Route 30 is a proposed assisted living facility,east of that is a Pizzeria Uno,then Hale Road(the ' primary northern entrance to the regional mall),then a gas station,and a McDonald's restaurant. Southerly of this development is a vast strip of furniture stores,restaurants and retail chains leading up to the Buckland Hills mall. 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 .Fax: (860) 291-8757 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. ' civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis I have reviewed the draft 1998-2003 Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan/Locational Guide map(March, 1997),relative to our site,and find it falls within the extreme southerly end of a white and lightest green area,which generally extends from Route 30 north to the Orchard Hill Drive neighborhood,west to Foster Street and its large neighborhood,and east to the Avery ' Street neighborhood. White areas are designated for"Rural Lands",which are defined as rural lands generally remote from existing urban areas and are lacking public water and sewer services as well as industrial,commercial or residential concentrations.Clearly,with public water and sewer facilities ' serving the Watson Farm site,Porter's Share,Flax Hill,Church of the Living God and the proposed retail site easterly of it,along with the contiguous commercial district and large residential subdivisions served by public sewer and water,this"Rural"designation no longer applies and is invalid. ' The light green areas are designated for conservation representing opportunities to provide for the state's food,fiber,water and other resources.While I agree that the land north of the Flax HilUWatson Farm/Porter's Share/Church of the Living God hedgerow has and may continue to provide valuable food, ' fiber and other resources,the small isolated parcels south of the Foster/Krawski properties do not and will not provide food, fiber,or other resources.They will and do provide shelter for our growing elderly population,a place to worship,and a place to buy goods and services. This too is an inappropriate designation for the subject property,and I recommend it and the properties southerly of the Foster Farm ' be removed from the"conservation"area. In summary,and in my opinion as a professional planner with more that two and a-half decades of government and consulting experience,the"rural"and"conservation"areas designations do not meet the criteria for such a designation,as expressed in the Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan,and should be modified accordingly,and if necessary,depicted as"neighborhood ' conservation areas"or"growth areas". My resume is attached for your review,along with a location plan and Watson Farm site plan. ' Sincerely, Desigrofessionals,Inc. 1 By: Peter R. DeMallie,President 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 •Fax: (860)291-8757 P 6 u RCAo F�� R4E' Ov Ft iv KORIOUNOS �[ DR/,�^ ycDrr $� 4 Er Alp- RD►� � Qp�►� Pk Sj. '1lh ��MOao%,w sit A ,per N\ wr �ewt ���IIOCA Rp�p �t ,1 TERRACE006 •-..._ �y d� ,� g °',+tic �". 4 � � 30 C e� F RCb AWS sir Oe� AY I co `�FY SITE LOCATION PLAN DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. ' civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis RESUME ' Peter R. DeMallie/President& Principal EDUCATION: ' 'Master of Community Planning,University of Rhode Island,Kingston,Rhode Island v Bachelor of Arts,Hiram College,Hiram,Ohio. 4 High School Diploma,Staples High School,Westport,Connecticut. ' EXPERIENCE: s Professional Planner since 1974. (key positions in municipalities,regional planning agency,and planning/civiVgis/survey consulting firm). ' •Directly participated in over 700 municipal night meetings. s Reviewed over$1/2 billion in land development proposals for communities. 'Authored master plans,zoning,and subdivision regulations. Supervised map preparation&GIS automation services. s Experienced in urban,suburban,and naal planning environments. ' President&Principal Pla =w&GIS Services-Design Professionals,Inc. Supervise staff of planners,civil engineers,gis analysts,&land surveyors.Supervise map preparation and G.I.S.data automation services. Plan and coordinate numerous governmental,industrial,residential,commercial,&institutional development projects throughout Connecticut. Author zoning ' and subdivision regulations. Presently providing consulting Town Planner services to Woodstock Provided consulting Town Planner services to Killingly and Burlington,Connecticut.Tenure has been 14+years(since 5/86). Director ofPlamdng-South Windsor,Connecticut. (Suburban Hartford,Pop.23,000). Department head position reporting ' directly to the Town Manager. Primary responsibilities were to evaluate land development proposals and to formulate community growth policies. Tenure highlights:Authored Town Plan components,major transportation study,and innovative zoning regulations governing housing and industrial parks. Town representative to policymaking bodies. Supervised Town mapping preparation. Concurrent interim positions:Building Department Administrator(1980/81);Zoning Enforcement ' Officer(1980/81);Economic Development Coordinator(1984). Tenure was 6.5 years(12/79-5/86). Senior Plamier-Northeastern Connecticut Regional Planning Agency. Agency's number 2 position. Chief planner/supervisor for HUD 701 planning,Grant-in-Aid,and EPA 209 Water Quality Programs. Position's assignments covered:housing;water quality;site plan review;and the region's Economic Development Plan. Regional Planner at same agency. Performed site plan ' reviews for municipalities and the Eastern Connecticut Environmental Review Team. Drafted numerous regulations, ordinances,and Town Plan amendments. Supervised Town and regional maps preparation. Functioned as on-call land use planner to 10 communities. Tenure at agency was 3.25 years. Town Planner:-Killingly,Connecticut(Pop. 15,000). Performed planning and zoning administration,subdivision&site plan review,and made regular presentations before governmental bodies. Authored Town Plan amendments,subdivision and zoning regulations. Supervised Town maps preparation. Tenure was 2.25 years(concurrent with Regional Planner position). Other Positions-Greater Bridgeport Regional Planning Agency. New York City headquarters of Crane Company. ' PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION AND AWARDS: Member,American Society of Consulting Planners(1986-present);Charter Member,American Planning Association(1978- present);President,South Windsor Chamber of Commerce(1992-1993),Board Member(1988-present),Executive Committee (1990-1994),Legislative Committee Chairman(1987-1992, 1993-1997);Member,CBIA(1996-present);Member,South ' Windsor Ambassador Club(1994 to present). Board Member&Executive Committee(1992-present),Secretary(19934), Treasurer(1994-1996),Vice-President/Operations&Personnel(1996-present),President-Elect(1999 to 2000)&President (2000- )Greater Hartford Tourism District;Chairman,East of the River Tourism&Convention District(1991-1993),Board ' Member&Executive Committee(1983-1993);Member,Savings Bank of Rockville Advisory Board(1985-1994);Member, 25th Anniversary Fund Committee,University of Rhode Island Graduate Curriculum in Community Planning; Member,The:,=:: Hartford Club(1988-1995); Steering Committee,East of the River Chambers of Commerce Association(1992-1993); Recipient of American Institute of Planners'Student Award for Outstanding Achievement(bestowed 1976 at the University of Rhode Island); Certificates of Appreciation from: American Red Crass(Connecticut Floods of 1984); S.Windsor Exchange Club(1983); South Windsor Chamber of Commerce(1986); East of the River Tourism&Convention District(1993),South Windsor Wand Wetlands Agency(1996);South Windsor Historical Society(Lifetime Membership bestowed I2/97);Town of South Windsor(1998/2000 volunteer appreciation);and Greater Hartford Tourism District(1999). 1 l/00 ' -165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 -Fax: (860)291-8757 - Date. invoice No. Descri .tion Amount Discount Net Amount 10/31/00 103100 PZC APPLICATION 130.00 130.00 10/31/00 *** CHECK 000105 TOTALS: 130.00 130.00 Detach stub before depositing WATSON FARM ASSOCIATES L.P. WATSON FARM ASSOCIATES L.P. 000105 10 EXECUTIVE DRIVE FLEET BANK 51-57/119/ FARMINGTON, CT 06032 HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT Aate Check NQ Payee;:T D **ONE HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS 10/31/00 000105 TOWN OF Pays.:ms Amount $ Y_� TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR **************130.00 C ` 118000 10 sum 1:0 1 1900 5 ? 0: 9 4 38 ? 8 L,0 58Ila Stormwater Management Plan Watson Farm South Windsor, Connecticut RECEIVED NOV 2tlOd �EPf. Prepared by Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 DPI Project No. 99-1270 November 3,2000 - ON , 3 ®z 5k ®( L w 9 16747 ! E. \� N7tJDfRII.M+ Table of Contents: Page# Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 1 Proposed Development 1 Off-Site Analysis 1 Peak Runoff control 2 Nonstructural Drainage System 2 Riparian Buffers 2 Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems 2 Stormwater Runoff Quality 2 Conveyance System 2 Discharge at the Natural Location 2 Maintenance and Operation 2 Topographic Contour Maps 3 Floodplain Boundaries 3 Drainage Design 3 On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations 4 Conclusions 5 Appendices Site Location Map A TR-55 Existing to the West B TR-55 Developed to Basin C TR-55 Developed Directly to Wetlands D Hydrograph Plots to Basin E Detention Basin Design F Hydrograph Routings through Basin G Storm Sewer Calculations H Outlet Channel I Introduction: The proposed Watson Farm Adult community is to be located on a parcel of land 8.69 acres in size, which is situated on the northern side of Deming Street in South Windsor, Connecticut. The South Windsor-Manchester Town line is located to the east of the site. The site has approximately 350 feet of frontage on Deming Street and consists of two parcels of land. Existing Conditions: The site consists of 8.69 acres of land. The site slopes down from east to west, and there is a wetland area along the western edge of the site. The topography on the site ranges from fairly flat (1-2% slopes), to over 10% slopes in areas. According to the Hartford County soil survey, the soils on the site consist of Enfield soils along the eastern side of the site, and Manchester soils between the Enfield soils and the wetlands. Immediately to the east of the site is the Porter Share development. To the North of the site is undeveloped land, and to the west of the site is a fairly large:wetland area. The front portion of the site contains 1 single family home with associated driveway and lawn. The majority of the front area of the site is wooded. The rear of the site contains a brush cover. There is a sanitary sewer easement that runs through the western end of the site. Proposed Development: The proposed development of the site consists of the construction of four sets of 3 buildings each containing a total of 72 housing units. Access roadways, parking, and sidewalks would be constructed as part of the development. The proposed development will contain a number of storm-water measures to accommodate both the increase in runoff from the development, and to address water quality of the runoff from the site. The runoff from the paved areas will be collected into a series of catch basins, and directed to an on-site detention basin. The detention basin will contain approximately 3.5' of depth below the outlet to catch the first flush from the site for treatment in the vegetation and potential infiltration. The proposed detention basin has been designed to detain the 2-100 year design storms at, or below existing discharge rates. The basin will have a high level overflow for flows in excess of the 100-year storm event. The detention basin will outlet to the west through a 15"pipe into a 200-foot long swale. The swale will provide additional water treatment prior to discharging to the wetlands. Off-Site Analysis: The site presently drains down from east to west to the wetlands on the western side of the site and extending off-site. The wetlands form the beginning of Farm Brook. There is a limited area of land to the north of the site that drains onto the site. The Porter Share development was designed to eliminate any runoff onto the site from the east. The Farm Brook wetlands in the area of the site consist of a number of ponds and depressions. There is a reasonably large amount of natural detention in this area. Peak Runoff Control: The site has been designed to drain into a detention basin that will mitigate the increase in runoff on the site to levels at or below existing peak rates. With the design of the detention basin, any impacts to the wetlands adjacent to the site due to increases in runoff from the site will be mitigated. Nonstructural Drainage Systems: The site will make use of a number of nonstructural measures to help control the storm-water on the site, and enhance the ability for infiltration of runoff into the soil. The detention basin will have over 3 foot of volume below the outlet structure for treatment of runoff from the site. The swale leading from the detention basin will also provide added water quality benefits. Riparian Buffers: The proposed development has been designed to maximise the separation of the developed areas of the site and the wetlands. The pavement has been designed to have a 60-80' separation distance. Grading for the support of the road, and the detention basin construction will infringe upon this separation distance. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Systems: An extensive erosion/sedimentation control plan has been developed as part of the site design. These measures include the following: 1. Installation of silt fence down-slope of disturbed areas. 2. Installation of silt fence around stockpiled materials. 3. Installation of silt fence around catch basins. 4. Use of the detention basin during construction as a sediment basin. 5. Seeding and mulching disturbed areas as soon as practical during construction. 6. Limiting the areas of disturbance during construction. 7. Installation of construction entrance pads, and sweeping of roadways as needed. 8. Maintenance of the above measures. Stormwater Runoff Quality: A number of water quality measures have been integrated into the site design to provide for treatment of the stormwater runoff from the site. These include the swale and detention basin which will provide extensive water quality renovation for the storm runoff. Conveyance System: The on-site conveyance system consists of a piped stormwater system discharging to a detention basin and swale. The piped drainage system has been designed for a 10 Yr design storm. The detention basin has been designed to handle the runoff from a 100-year design storm through the outlet, and larger storm events through the emergency overflow. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site discharge to the west will be to on-site wetlands in the area of an existing depression that forms a small pond within the wetlands. The design peak flows from the site will be very low(1.60 CFS for a 100 year design storm). Maintenance and Operation: The following maintenance operations will be required to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the Storm Water Detention Basin System. The following maintenance schedule is intended to be a minimum guide, and additional inspections and maintenance measures may be required following large storm events that could cause the deposition of excess debris in the system. Pipe Outlet Locations: The pipe outlets and associated riprap shall be inspected annually and cleaned of silt and or debris. The riprap shall be re-shaped and replenished as required. Catch Basins: The catch Basins within each lot shall be inspected annually. The sumps shall be cleaned when the depth of material within the sumps reaches 1'. Pavement Sweeping: The parking lots within each lot shall be swept at a minimum of twice per year. Once in the spring shortly after the end of the snow season, and once in the fall after the leaves have fallen. Outlet Structure: The detention basin outlet structure shall be inspected twice annually, and all debris and silt shall be removed. The discharge point from the outlet system shall be inspected also, and all silt and debris shall be removed. The riprap at the discharge shall be re-arranged and additional stone added as needed. All silt and debris shall be disposed of at a suitable location. Topographic Contour Maps: Topographic contour maps have been provided showing the drainage areas for the site at a scale of 1"=40'. The maps showing the existing and developed conditions are included in the rear of this report. F000dplain Boundaries: There are no floodplain boundaries on the site. Drainage Design: The drainage design of the site has been completed utilizing a number of computer programs and generally accepted design methods. The runoff from the site under existing and developed conditions was developed utilizing the TR-55 computer program. The flood routing and basin modeling was completed utilizing the Hydroflow Hydrographs for Windows computer program by Intelisolve. The drainage piping on site was designed using the rational formula. Under existing conditions, the site drains overland from the east to the west. The TR-55 calculations for the existing runoff to the west are contained in appendix B. The summary of the results is as follows: Design Storm Peak Discharge 2 0 10 1 25 2 50 4 100 6 Under developed conditions, the site will continue to drain to the west. The drainage to the west under developed conditions has been divided into two components; the discharge to the west through the detention basin, and the discharge to the west directly to the wetlands. The TR-55 analysis for the discharge to the basin is included in appendix C. The TR-55 analysis for the discharge directly to the wetlands is included in appendix D. The summary of the existing and developed discharges is as follows: Storm Event Existing Developed to Basin Developed to Wetlands 2 0 4 0 10 1 11 0 25 2 15 1 50 4 18 1 100 6 22 2 Appendix E contains the hydrograph plots for the runoff to the basin for the 2 through 100-year storm events. The detention basin was designed to contain the 2-100 year storm events within the basin, and to discharge at a rate that when combined with the developed discharge directly to the wetlands, would be less than or equal to the peak rate of runoff to the west under existing conditions. Up to the 100-year storm event will discharge from the basin through a single 6" orifice, and the outlet pipe. Storms in excess of the 100-year storm event would discharge through a catch basin top on the outlet structure. The design of the detention basin is included in appendix F. The hydrograph routings of the 2-100 year design storms through the detention basin are included in appendix G. A summary of the existing and post developed drainage discharges are as follows: Storm Event Existing Developed Developed Discharge (CFS) Discharge (CFS) Discharge (CFS) (From Basin) (Direct to Wetlands) 2 year 0 * 0 10 year 1 0.72 0 25 year 2 1.09 1 50 year 4 1.32 1 100 year 6 1.58 2 * The 2-year design flow is less than 0.5 CFS. On-Site Storm Sewer Calculations: The storm sewer calculations for the storm piping within the proposed subdivision roadway are included in appendix H. The storm sewer has been designed for a 10-year design storm utilizing the rational formula. The calculations for the outlet channel from the detention basin are included in appendix I. Conclusions: The on-site stormwater system with the associated detention basin will mitigate any potential storm-water quantity impacts from the development of the site. The proposed additional capacity of the basin below the outlet structure in concert with the proposed on-site swale will mitigate water quality impacts from the proposed development. APPENDIX A APPENDIX B RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing conditions Subarea : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 75% - .45(61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - .15(98) - - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good 2.4 (30) 3.36(48) - 0.46(73) Woods good 1.69 (30) .71(55) - .21 (77) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 4.09 4.67 .67 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 9.43 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 44* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) ,(ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Sheet 3.2 200 .07 f 0.251 Shallow Concent'd 400 .1 u 0.022 Time of Concentration = 0.27* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Existing conditions Data: Drainage Area 9.43 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 44 Time of Concentration: 0.27 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE I Storm Number I 1 I 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 1--=-------------------1------1------1 ------I------i------1 1 Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 E 50 1 100 1 I i I I i I I 1 24-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 1 4.7 1 5.5 I 6.2 I 6.9 I i Ia/P Ratio 10.80 10.54, 1 0.46 1 0.41 10.37 1 I I I I I I I I Used 10.50 1 0.50 1 0.46 1 0.41 1 0.37 1 i I I I I I I i Runoff (in) 10.03 1 0.31 ► 0.56 1 0.82 1 1.11 1 I I I I I I I 1 Unit Peak Discharge 10.355 10.355 10.416 10.516 10.589 1 I (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pond and Swamp Factor) 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 i 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------1------1------I------1------1 I Peak Discharge (cfs) I 0 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX C RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions Subarea : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab. ) Open space (Lawns,parks etc. ) Good condition; grass cover > 75% 1.98 (39) 2.58 (61) - - Impervious Areas Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways 1.35(98) 1.35(98) - - OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good - .735(48) - - Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 3.33 4.66 --------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.995 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 67* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sheet 3.2 70 .05 f 0.124 Open Channel 500 2 0.069 Time of Concentration = 0.19* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions Data: Drainage Area 7.995 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 67 * Time of Concentration: 0.19 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE I Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 I----------------------I------I------I------I------I------I I Frequency (yrs) I 2 I 10 I 25 I 50 1 100 1 I I I I I I I 124-Hr Rainfall (in) I 3.2 I 4.7 I 5.5 I 6.2 I 6.9 1 I I I I I I I Ia/P Ratio 10.31 ► 0.21 10.18 10.16 1 0.14 1 I I I I I I I I Runoff (in) 10.69 11.60 12.16 12.68 1 3.23 1 I I I i I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.765 10.831 10.849 10.861 10.870 1 I (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 I 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I ►----------------------I------I------I------I------I------I I Peak Discharge (cfs) I 4 I 11 I 15 I 18 I 22 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX D RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00 Project : Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions-directly to wetlands Subarea : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrologic Soil Group COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D . Acres (CN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS Brush - brush, weed, grass mix good .46(30) - - .46(73) Woods good .30 (30) - - .21 (77) Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) .76 .67 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREA: 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 1.43 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 51* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00 Project : Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions-directly to wetlands ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) ------------------------------------------------------7------------------------ Sheet 3.2 50 .05 i 0.248 Time of Concentration = 0.25* --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res. ) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved- D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD Version 2.00 Project : Metro User: GBS Date: 10-26-99 County : Hartford State: CT Checked: Date: Subtitle: Developed conditions-directly to wetlands Data: Drainage Area 1.43 * Acres Runoff Curve Number 51 * Time of Concentration: 0.25 * Hours Rainfall Type III Pond and Swamp Area NONE I Storm Number I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 1----------------------i------1------I------1------1------1 I Frequency (yrs) I 2 1 10 1 25 I 50 1 100 I I I i I I I I 124-Hr Rainfall (in) 1 3.2 1 4.7 1 5.5 1 6.2 1 6.9 1 I I I I i I I Ia/P Ratio 10.60 1 0.41 1 0.35 1 0.31 1 0.28 1 I I I I I I I 1 Used 1 0.50 10.41 10.35 1 0.31 1 0.28 1 I I I I I I I Runoff (in) 10.15 10.62 10.97 1 1.32 1 1.70 i I I I I I I I Unit Peak Discharge 10.362 ►0.532 10.639 10.694 10.721 1 (cfs/acre/in) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pond and Swamp Factorl 1.00 1 1-.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 1 1 0.0% Ponds Used I I I I I I 1----------------------1------1 ------I------I------I------1 I Peak Discharge (cfs) i 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines APPENDIX E Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 22 with buildings Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 3.68 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 7.99 ac Curve number = 67 Basin Slope = 7.0 % Hydraulic length = 600 ft Tc method = LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.5 min Total precip. = 3.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 h'rs Shape factor = 484 Total Volume=18,694 cuft 22 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp 3.68 cfs 4 3 0 2 + Hyd. 22 CJ 1 0 0 5 10 15 "20 25 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 23 with buildings Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 10.53 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 7.99 ac Curve number = 67 Basin Slope = 7.0 % Hydraulic length = 600 ft Tc method = LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.5 min Total precip. = 4.70 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 520 Total Volume=46,690 cuft 23 - SCS Runoff - 10 Yr - Qp = 10.53 cfs 15 10 + Hyd. 23 CY 5 0. 0 5 10 15 20 25 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 24 with buildings Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 14.81 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 7.99 ac Curve number = 67 Basin Slope = 7.0 % Hydraulic length = 600 ft Tc method = LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.5 min Total precip. = 5.50 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 530 Total Volume=64,334 cuft 24 - SCS Runoff - 25 Yr - Op = 14.81 cfs 15 10 + Hyd. 24 CY 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 25 with buildings Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 17.70 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 7.99 ac Curve number = 67 Basin Slope = 7.0 % Hydraulic length = 600 ft Tc method = LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.5 min Total precip. = 6.20 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 505 Total Volume=76,136 cuft 25 - SCS Runoff - 50 Yr Qp = 17.70 cfs 20 15 N CJ 10 + Hyd. 25 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 26 with buildings Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 22.04 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 7.99 ac Curve number = 67 Basin Slope = 7.0 % Hydraulic length = 600 ft Tc method = LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 11.5 min Total precip. = 6.90 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 520 Total Volume=94,343 cult 26 - SCS Runoff - 100 Yr Qp = 22.04 cfs 25 20 15 + Hyd. 26 CY 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 APPENDIX F Reservoir Report Page , Reservoir No. 2 - detent basin English Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas Stage / Storage Table Stage Elevation Contour area Incr. Storage Total storage ft ft sqft cuft cuft 0.00 178.00 3,100 0 0 2.00 180.00 6,100 9,200 9,200 4.00 182.00 9,135 15,235 24,435 6.00 184.00 12,600 21,735 46,170 8.00 186.00 15,000 27,600 73,770 Culvert/ Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise in = 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest Len ft = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Span in = 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crest El.ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El. ft = 181.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eqn. Exp. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Length ft = 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multistage = No No No No Slope% = 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N-Value. = .013 .000 .000 .000 Orif. Coeff. = 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = ----- No No No Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Civ A Civ B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Discharge ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 178.00 0.00 --- --- --- --- -- --- -- 0.00 2.00 9,200 180.00 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.00 4.00 24,435 182.00 0.10 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.10 6.00 46,170 184..00 1.37 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.37 8.00 73,770 186.00 1.91 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.91 detent basin 6 cu 2 0 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 Storage (tuft) detent basin ♦ Total g ■ Culy A $ • Culv B 4 ♦ Culv C � o Culv D 2 ❑ Weir A o Weir B O o Weir C Fo 0.5 1 .0 1 .5 2.p A Weir D Discharge (cfs) APPENDIX G Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 34 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.72 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 23 Reservoir name = detent basin Max. Elevation = 182.51 ft Max. Storage = 29,953 cuft Storage indication method used. Total Volume=25,302 cuft 34 - Reservoir - 10 Yr - Qp = 0.72 cfs 15 + Hyd. 23 10 CY 5 + Hyd. 34 0 0 20 40 60 80 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 33 25-year Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.09 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 24 Reservoir name = detent basin Max. Elevation = 183.24 ft Max. Storage = 37,901 cuft Storage Indication method used. Total Volume=42,946 cuft 33 Reservoir - 25 Yr - Qp = 1.09 cfs 15 + Hyd. 24 10 CY + Hyd. 33 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 32 50-year Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.32 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 25 Reservoir name = detent basin Max. Elevation = 183.85 ft Max. Storage = 44,592 cuft Storage Indication method used. Total Volume=54,747 cuff 32 - Reservoir - 50 Yr - Qp = 1.32 cfs 20 15 + Hyd. 25 v 10 CY 5 + Hyd. 32 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Hydrograph Plot English Hyd. No. 31 100 year Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.58 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 26 Reservoir name = detent basin Max.'Elevation = 184.70 ft Max. Storage = 55,871 cuft Storage Indication method used. Total Volume=72,955 cuft 31 - Reservoir - 100 Yr - Qp = 1.58 cfs 25 20 + Hyd. 26 N 15 v C1 10 5 + Hyd. 31 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 APPENDIX H TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORY SEWER 3Y3TEM DE316N FORM 2.2 1 PROJECT W 76 v DE31ONED By DATE STREET FIRM CHECKED QY SHEET N• OF 3 _ out N31VAAOY3H 1 �110VdV0 lln� "� O N .o 0 1R �, o til S A110013A 39VU3AV. 3dOlS = ° o\ ° Ll - 0 0 0 3did d0 H19N31 - 00 r 3ZIS 3didzt- W31SAS N1 0 mns O M O W r p O Q M O p - O .fl ,111SN31NI 11VdNIVa o W31SAS NI cis IV JO wns v o 0 0 0 p 0 o ® o ! . NISV8 Ho1V0 9N 1831N3 IV O a O r s o Q M O 3W11 031V1nwn0OV v o O Q 3did NI 31N111 i o I o 1 i o HP � 131NI013W11rLs a o o p o r nt 1N31AV93S 3N11Dc v v J v II-23 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORY SEWER 3Y3TEM OE31901 I FORM 2.2 1 PROJECT DESIGNED By DATE cvR7'Sow FARE GBS o 1 ao STREET FIRM CHECKED BY SHEET N• PX O F 3 i U31V/1A0r3H ,� Tr A110013A 39Va3AV. 0 3dOlS - I'1 L� 3did d0 H19N31 Ls o o 4 O o 321S 3did NI31SAS NI 0 0 o p p M M AIISN31NI 1lVdNIVS ti - ^ M m 1431SAS NI IV jo wns fD o a U NISVB Ho1V0 o 9NI831N3 IV O 0 a o 0 3W11 031vinwn00v v i O p _ pO rj Co � M 3did NI 3N111 po �O 131NI 013MIil a t� v O In ra ,0 1N3W93S 3NIl — cr v II-23 STREET CHECKED BY 1111 i 16�111111111111 3dld -40 NION39111l1��111111111111 0111�11�111111111111 � 0111�1��111111111111 �OIII�IE�111111111111 0111�11�111111111111 moo.■■�.�Q..■.�.■�.... �IIII�I��IIIIIIIIIIII APPENDIX I tmp#1 Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trapezoidal Solving for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depth of Flow Flowrate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 6000 cfs Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0004 ft/ft Manning' s n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 0175 Height . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120000. 0000 in Bottom width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 . 0000 in Left slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 3330 ft/ft Right slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 3330 ft/ft Computed Results: Depth 4 . 7217 in Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 7848 fps Flow area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . 0388 ft2 Flow perimeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 . 8898 in Hydraulic radius 3 .7694 in Top width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76. 3587 in Area 2 . 0388 ft2 Perimeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77. 8898 in Percent full . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100. 0000 % Critical Information Critical depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 9628 in Critical slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0086 ft/ft Critical velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . 1780 fps Critical area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 7346 ft2 Critical perimeter . . . . . . . . . . . . 60. 4250 in Critical hydraulic radius . . . . . . . 1 . 7507 in Critical top width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59. 7886 in Specific energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 4030 ft Page 1 tmp#1 Minimum energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 2454 ft Froude number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .2444 Flow condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subcritical Page 2 ....�...;.i:YY,FiSi•L',•'i�rr�;l,�Jxe 3 ••},.,i:Y,.'4..���y_,Y..�..yY')i2::'25E y:>i i?i>4� ::',,,,YS>yr}3::.;';;�;!•>.`4.,.,:y}•r4}+ti rz,ti�.: ,,,:,:r.5::Yy,....,yt;.:7{l:,.i..�il�r.ti':i�ti�r•x .�tY}sN tfiiti�,1,±•+.7.�:'G;+' ,`:i::iyi,4,°yiii'.........t::r i �. ?:SiC:;'Cgi'-°:;`•it?:�:�7;r rti•,:," , :.! ,� �.,,•.r:,. .....,9Ki(:c�i :.;i ;r",.:;------ f:•.i'i,•v t:liEt:,'i:+(f•.;`.,:;x i5.r,;3y:.,•`:.:N.^;•; 'Y'.Y \j'•.yi�... ,+ :f' R..r4::ry},ii,R:s.�i: }.y.Y k•\t:''�'i.�i� J ••:��ir:M1 •y��-4i'i•.i:,.,: �<.ti::;:Y'5�.:.::{.. �J'#; �,....4.i:ti. +.�? .A .rf '�v. r }�'/,:�:• :Y.,•vy:,i4:t:::y.. Date: 9/27/00 :f).�y ••. '{:::.:.. •,t`r:���y4yy{':...y.�ry..�t�,\::k:..,,'rli::y y�.'rA,: To: Marcia A. Banach From: Geoffrey W. Sager Subject: Restrictive Covenants Enclosed please find the two CHFA restrictive covenants that govern the property for 70 years. The covenant limits the income of persons living at the property to 60% of the Hartford PMSA Annual Income as determined annually by HUD. It also restrict rents based on an imputed rent schedule, where a person or family earning 60% of the Hartford PMSA median income would spend no more that 30% of his or her earning for rent and utilities. Please let me know if you think we need to do anything else in South Windsor. Thank you. 0 DECLARATION AND AGREEMENT OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Agreement made and entered into as of the 28th day of July, 1999, by and between WHISPERING PINES II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut with an office and principal place of business at 10 Executive Drive, Farmington, Connecticut (the "Declarant"), and the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, a body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State, having its office and principal place of business in the Town of Rocky Hill, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut (the "Authority"), WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, the Declarant, as owner in fee simple of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"), has applied to the Authority for a first mortgage loan in the amount of TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100THS ($2,465,000.00) DOLLARS (the "Mortgage Loan") to aid the Declarant in financing the construction on the Property of a rental housing development for elderly persons of low and moderate income, pursuant to the provisions (i) of the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority Act, Chapter 134 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended (the "Act") and (ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") and the regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended (the "Regulations"); WHEREAS, the Property is known as WHISPERING PINES PHASE II, Bickford Drive Extension, Avon, Connecticut 06001 and is identified as Authority Development No. 98019M; WHEREAS, Declarant acknowledges that (i) the Authority is providing the Mortgage Loan to the Declarant to finance the construction of the Development in furtherance of its corporate purposes under the Act and (ii) the accomplishment of such purposes is dependent in part upon compliance by the Declarant with the restrictive covenants set forth herein; WHEREAS, Declarant acknowledges the resulting beneficial interest of the Authority in the Development and acknowledges that its ownership and operation of the Development are in furtherance of the discharge of a public trust; WHEREAS, the Authority, as a condition of its willingness to make the Mortgage Loan, requires that the Declarant shall, by entering into the restrictions, terms, conditions and covenants set forth below, consent to be regulated and restricted by the Authority in the management and operation of the Development as herein provided and as provided by the Mortgage Loan documents, the Act, the Code, the Regulations, and any rules, regulations, policies, and procedures of the Authority promulgated thereunder; and WHEREAS, Declarant is willing to execute and abide by this Declaration as a condition of obtaining the Mortgage Loan and receiving continuing benefits under the Act, the Code and the Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Mortgage Loan, and of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 'i Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 1 1. PROPERTY This Agreement affects the Property which is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement, the terms below shall have the definitions set forth for each one: a. "Compliance Period" means with respect to any building, the period of fifteen (15) taxable years beginning with the first (1st) taxable year of the credit period with respect thereto, as defined in Section 42 (i) (1) of the Code; b. "Development" means all real and personal property and all assets of whatever nature or wherever situate, used in or owned by the business conducted on the Property, which business is to provide rental housing accommodations for elderly persons of low and moderate income and other activities incidental thereto. Declarant will make no change in the nature, size (including number of units) or location of the Development from that which was shown on the drawings, plans and specifications submitted to the Authority, and from that which was described in the presentation to and Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority adopted on April 29, 1998;. C. "Extended Use Period"with respect to a building means the period (i) beginning on the first (1st) day in the Compliance Period on which such building is part of a qualified low-income housing project, and (ii) ending on the later of (1) the date specified by the Authority in the Extended Low-Income Housing Commitment or (II) the date which is fifteen (15) years after the close of the Compliance Period; d. "Fiscal Year" means the calendar year or any other period agreed to in writing by the parties hereto as the fiscal year for the Declarant; e. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or any successor thereto; f. "Mortgage Loan" means the $2,465,000 interest bearing obligation made by the Declarant to the Authority, evidenced by a note (the "Authority Note") and secured by (i) a mortgage deed (the "Authority Mortgage") which shall constitute a first lien on the Development and (ii) a security agreement, a collateral assignment of leases and rentals, and other loan documents; g. "Qualified Persons" means individuals and families who, at the time each such individual or family first occupies a unit in the Development have annual income as set out in Section 3f1 below h. "Qualified Rent" means the rent charged for a rent-restricted unit, as defined in section 42(g)(2) of the Code; i. "State" means the State of Connecticut. 3. RESTRICTION ON USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT The Declarant hereby covenants and represents to the Authority as follows: a. The Development- The Development shall consist of the facilities described in the drawings, plans and specifications submitted to the Authority and in the presentation to and Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority adopted Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 2 on April 29, 1998 and shall be located on the real estate described in Exhibit A attached hereto; b. Components of Development - The Development will consist of a building or buildings or structure and facilities functionally related and subordinated thereto, owned by the same person(s) for tax purposes, all located on two tracts of land and financed under a common plan of finance, and 1. each containing one or more similarly constructed units, having separate and complete facilities for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for an elderly single person or family, and facilities which are functionally related and subordinate to such units; and 2. all of the residential units of which will be rented or available on a non-transient basis for rental to elderly members of the general public, will be suitable for residential occupancy, and will comply with all State and local health, safety and building codes. C. The Declarant will proceed with due diligence to promptly complete construction of the Development in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the Authority. d. Change in Development - The Declarant will make no change in the nature, size (including number of residential units) or location of the Development from that which was shown on the drawings, plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the Authority and from that which was described in the presentation to and Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority adopted on April 29, 1998, as modified to date, without the prior written consent of the Authority. Y e. Continuous Rental Restriction -The Declarant will maintain all of the units included in the Development rented or available for rental on a continuous basis to elderly members of the general public during the Extended Use Period. f. Qualified Low-Income Housing Project Restriction 1. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to comply with the requirements for obtaining low-income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Code with respect to the Development during the Compliance Period. Declarant also hereby covenants and agrees to comply with its obligations under the Extended Low-Income Housing Commitment entered into between Declarant and the Authority pursuant to Section 42(h)(6) of the Code and incorporated herein by reference (the "Income Limitation"). (i) During the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period, each residential unit (the "Qualified Units") in the Development shall be rented or available for rental on a continuous basis to members of the general public on other than a transient basis, and three (3) 1-bedroom units shall be both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose annual income is TWENTY-FIVE (25%) PERCENT or less of the area median gross income adjusted for family size; an additional five (5) 1-bedroom units shall be both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose annual income is FIFTY (50%) PERCENT or less of the area median gross income adjusted for family size; and forty-five (45) units shall be both rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose annual income is SIXTY (60%) PERCENT or less of the area median gross income adjusted for family size, in accordance with the following: Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky HiN, Connecticut 06067 3 (ii) The maximum rents that can be charged for such units will be uniform for each particular housing unit size (e.g., one bedroom units, two bedroom units) regardless of the number of persons residing in the household; (iii) At the discretion of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, the maximum income levels may deviate from the area median income data to reflect current HUD policy or future Treasury policy on income limits with respect to areas with unusually low family income or high housing cost relative to family income consistent with HUD's determination under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended ("Section 8"); (iv) The Development shall have at least fifty-three (53) Qualified Units; and (v) All of the units in the Development shall remain Qualified Units for a period of thirty (30) years beyond the term of the Mortgage Loan. Income and area median gross income shall be determined in a manner consistent with determinations of lower income families under Section 8, adjusted for family size, as determined by HUD. The Development shall meet the requirements of the aforesaid sub- paragraph (f) not later than the close of the first year of the tax credit period, except as otherwise provided and permitted under subsection (g)(3) of Section 42 of the Code. 2. After initial occupancy but upon again becoming vacant, a unit shall be treated as occupied by an elderly individual or family meeting the Income Limitation until occupied, other than for a temporary period, by another occupant, at which time the character of the unit shall be redetermined by the new occupant's income. In no event shall a temporary period exceed thirty (30) days. A unit occupied by an individual or family who, at the commencement of occupancy, met the Income Limitation shall be treated as occupied by an elderly individual or family meeting the Income Limitation during such individual's or family's tenancy in such unit, unless the individual or family income exceeds one hundred forty (140) percent of the Income Limitation at the time of the most recent income Determination (as described in Paragraph 4 below). In such event, the unit shall be treated as occupied by an individual or family meeting the Income Limitation if, after such Determination, but before the next Determination, any residential unit of comparable or smaller size is occupied by a new resident whose income does not exceed the Income Limitation. 3. Gross rent does not include any payment under Section 8 or any comparable rental assistance program (with respect to such Qualified Units or occupants thereof) and any equivalent rental payment under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 or fee for a supportive service as defined by the Code, but shall include any utility allowance determined by the Secretary of the Treasury after taking into account such determinations under such Section 8. 4. At least annually the Declarant shall make a determination on the basis of current income (the "Determination") of whether the income of an individual or family residing in a unit of the Development exceeds the Income Limitation. Annually the Declarant shall certify compliance with the Income Limitation to the Authority and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, if 1 Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 4 required (at such times and in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe). 5. Declarant agrees to furnish to the Authority, on at least an annual basis, or on some other basis as determined by the Authority to be required by the Code and the Regulations, such information as the Authority shall require, including (i) any compliance forms now or hereafter required to be filed with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Authority, and (ii) a form entitled Compliance Monitoring: Owner's Annual Certification" attached hereto as Exhibit B, and to maintain on file Tenant Income Certifications, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, tenant lists, lease applications, copies of any compliance forms filed with the Secretary of the Treasury or Internal Revenue Service, and a waiting list, in order to permit verification that the covenants set forth herein are being satisfied by the Declarant and to take such action as the Authority shall deem necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. Declarant shall use tenant lease forms acceptable to the Authority, or, if there are no written leases, written and signed certifications of tenants so as to be able to determine the qualifications of the tenant or take such other corrective action as is necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. Such leases or certifications will contain clauses wherein each tenant certifies as to the accuracy of statements made in the Tenant Income Certification and agrees that family income and other eligibility requirements shall be deemed substantial and material obligations of his/her tenancy, that he/she will comply with all requests for information with respect thereto from the Declarant or the Authority and that failure to provide accurate information on the Tenant Income Certification or refusal to comply with a request for information with respect thereto shall be deemed a violation of a substantial obligation of his/her tenancy. g. Declarant understands and agrees that the Development is to be elderly residential rental housing within the meaning of the Act, the Code and Regulations, as amended, and is to be used for the benefit of those members of the general public of low and moderate income upon certain terms and conditions. Declarant hereby covenants and represents to the Authority as follows: 1. During the Extended Use Period, the Development is required to set aside all units for elderly individuals or families who meet the Income Limitation, at the Qualified Rent, as determined by the Authority. Thereafter, for a period of not less than thirty (30) years beyond the term of the Mortgage Loan, Declarant will lease, at the Qualified Rent, or sell all of the units in the Development in such a manner that said units will be leased or sold, or held vacant and available for lease or sale, only to individuals or families who meet the Income Limitation, as determined by the Authority, or its successor. Such continuing restriction for the said period shall operate as follows: (A) In the event that all or any part of the Development is sold, transferred or otherwise conveyed to any other individual, party or entity other than the Declarant, such conveyance must be made by deed subject to an affirmative covenant running with the land, which covenant will bind the grantee of such deed, and all successors, assigns, and heirs thereof, to the restrictions contained in this Agreement. In the event that such affirmative covenant is omitted from any such deed of conveyance, then such affirmative covenant shall be deemed to have been included and shall run with the land Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 5 as if it had been contained in such deed. The covenant and restrictions are to be binding to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, for the benefit of, in favor of and enforceable by the Authority, or any of their successors, or their successors and assigns as their interest may appear; and (B) In the event that the Development shall at any time during the Extended Use Period be converted to a common interest community by the Declarant or any grantee as aforesaid, such conversion shall include in the declaration of common interest community an affirmative covenant running with the land and such common interest community shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which covenant will bind the common interest community association, the common interest community unit owner and their respective successors and assigns, to the restrictions contained in this Agreement. Said covenant shall also require that all units in the common interest community shall be sold, or held vacant for sale, only to individuals or families who meet the Income Limitation, as determined by the Authority or their successors at the time of such sale. The covenant is to be binding upon the common interest community association, its successors and assigns to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, for the benefit of, in favor of and enforceable by the Authority, or any of its successors, or its successors and assigns as their interests may appear; and the said declaration of common interest community shall require that all units that are to be sold or available for sale to individuals or families who meet the Income Limitation, shall also be subject to the further restriction that no reconveyance of any such units shall be made unless and until the seller of such unit receives a certification in recordable form acceptable to the Authority or its successors or its nominee that the prospective purchaser is an individual who meets the Income Limitation. The Authority or its successors or nominee shall designate a party to issue such a certification and shall notify the common interest community, from time to time, of the identity of such party. 2. In the event of the substantial destruction or condemnation of the Development, as determined by the Authority in its sole discretion, which destruction is not rebuilt or corrected for any reason, then the Declarant shall have the right to request, and the Authority shall, so long as it has not delivered any applicable insurance proceeds to the Declarant, release and waive the Declarant and the Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. Upon such destruction or condemnation, the Authority, or its successors, or its nominee, shall execute appropriate documents for the Declarant, its successors or assigns to record on the land records for the Town where the Development is located rescinding the restrictions contained herein, if the Authority elects to so release and waive the Declarant and Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. In the event that the Authority delivers the said insurance proceeds to the Declarant, and the Declarant is required to repair or reconstruct pursuant to the terms of the Mortgage Loan, then the restrictions and covenants herein shall remain in full force and effect. 3. As required by the Authority, in every Fiscal Year during the period provided for in the paragraph entitled 'Restriction on Use of the Development", or until the Authority Mortgage has been released, whichever period is longer, Declarant shall deliver to the Authority, in a form approved by the Authority, a certificate setting forth the percentage of units occupied by individuals or Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 6 families who meet the Income Limitation. The Authority shall have the right to inspect the Declarant's records regarding tenants and tenant selection policy at any time, and to request and receive any information, documentation, or other confirmation that Declarant's tenant selection policy complies with the requirements of the Authority. 4. To the extent necessary to comply with the Act, the Authority's Procedures, including, but not limited to, the Qualified Allocation Plan and Application Process Procedures, the Code and the Regulations, the Authority shall have the right to take any and all actions which it deems appropriate, to rent any unleased or vacant dwelling unit in the Development (if the Property is used for rental units), including without limitation thereof the right to the appointment of a receiver to enter upon and take possession of the Development, to enter into tenant leases, to collect all rents, revenues, issues, income, products and profits thereof and apply the same as the court may direct or to seek any remedy available or necessary for the enforcement of the covenants and restrictions herein. The receiver shall have the rights and powers permitted under the laws of the State and such other powers as the court making such appointment shall confer. 4. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect throughout the applicable period in Paragraph 3 hereof to the extent necessary to comply with the Act, the Code and the Regulations, and to enable the Authority and its successors and assigns to enforce compliance by Declarant with the covenants, terms and conditions of the Mortgage Loan and of this Declaration. The covenants and restrictions of the Declarant herein set forth are intended to be and shall be considered covenants which run with the real estate described in Exhibit A attached hereto and shall bind all subsequent owners of such real estate, except to the extent herein provided. The Authority and the Declarant hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants set forth herein touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Development by low and moderate income persons, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants. The covenants of the Declarant set forth herein are enforceable by the Authority as a contract beneficiary whether or not the Declarant is or remains indebted to the Authority except to the extent herein provided. 5. Declarant warrants to the Authority that it will not execute other declarations or agreements with provisions contradictory, or in opposition to, the provisions hereof and that in any event the requirements of this Declaration are paramount and controlling as to the rights and obligations set forth and shall supersede any other requirements in conflict therewith. 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, as their interests may appear, except that a foreclosing mortgagee, other foreclosing lien holder, or other owner of the equity, a trustee in bankruptcy or heir of any owner shall be exempt from this Agreement, until such time as the foreclosed upon unit, or unit held by a trustee in bankruptcy, or unit taken by devise, is sold, leased or otherwise conveyed, at which time such sale, lease, or conveyance shall be subject to the covenants and restrictions herein. 7. The covenants of the Declarant set forth herein shall survive a sale, transfer, or other disposition of the Development by the Declarant, but shall cease to apply to the Development in the event of involuntary noncompliance caused by fire even though compensated by insurance, government seizure, requisition, change in a federal law or an action of a state or federal government which prevents the Authority from enforcing the requirements herein. The covenants of the Declarant, however, shall survive a foreclosure, transfer of title by deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar event if, as a result of such event, at any time during the Extended Use Period the Declarant or a related person Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 7 (as defined in Section 1.103-10 (e) of the Regulations) obtains an ownership interest in the Development. 8. Declarant hereby represents, warrants, and agrees that to the best of its ability it will file or record such documents and take such other steps as are necessary in order to ensure that the requirements and restrictions of this Agreement will be binding upon all owners and/or lessees of the Development, including, but not limited to, the execution and recordation of this Agreement in the land records of the town or city in which the Development is located. 9. Declarant hereby covenants to include the requirements and restrictions contained in this Agreement in any documents transferring any interest in the Development to another person so that such transferee has notice of, and is bound by, such restrictions, and to obtain the agreement from any transferee to be bound by and comply with the requirements set forth in this Agreement. 10. In the event the Declarant fails to comply with the covenants set forth herein, the Authority shall have the right to accelerate the Mortgage Loan (if the Declarant is then indebted to the Authority), to pursue its remedies under the Mortgage Loan and to maintain an action or actions in law or in equity against the Declarant to recover the damages incurred by the Authority from such failure or to require the Declarant (through injunctive relief or specific performance) to comply with the provisions and covenants set forth herein and to immediately cure any failure to comply with the covenants set forth herein by the Declarant. 11. The Declarant acknowledges that this Agreement is based, in part, upon the Code and Regulations as they exist on the date hereof and that the Code and Regulations may be subsequently modified or interpreted by the Federal government in a manner which the Authority believes is inconsistent with the covenants set forth herein. The Declarant agrees to comply with any additional covenant and restriction which the Authority believes upon advice of counsel to the Authority is necessary and which is communicated in writing to the Declarant, even though such covenant or restriction is not a part of this Agreement as originally executed;'provided, however, that if counsel for the Declarant disagrees with the advice of counsel for the Authority, Declarant shall have the right at its own expense to proceed with obtaining a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or such court interpretation which Declarant deems advisable and in its best interest, and the Authority agrees to cooperate fully with Declarant in this connection, so long as Declarant bears the Authority's expenses in obtaining such ruling. In such event, such additional covenant or restriction shall be considered a material part of this Agreement as if it had been originally included herein. 12. The Declarant shall cause this Agreement and the Mortgage Loan, and all amendments and supplements hereto and thereto, to be recorded and filed in the conveyance and real property records of the town in which the Development is located and in such other places as the Authority may reasonably request. The Declarant shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with any such recording. 13. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to execute, file, and provide any and all information, documentation, or verification required by the federal government or the Authority regarding the covenants and agreements contained herein. Declarant agrees to pay the Authority's fees as from time to time determined by the Authority for its compliance monitoring duties. 14. The invalidity of any clause, part or provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 8 a 15. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Connecticut, except to the extent superseded by Federal law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered WHISPERING PINES II ASSOCIATES in the Presence of. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: WHISPERING PINES II DEVELOPMENT CORP. GENERALPARTNER Geoffr y Sager Presiden Duly Authorized CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY 1 BY �Y)A e' T GAR E. KINdJ � PRESIDENT- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STATE OF CONNECTICUT )' ss: ROCKY HILL July JT , 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, Geoffrey W. Sager, President of WHISPERING PINES 11 DEVELOPMENT CORP., General Partner of WHISPERING PINES II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Connecticut limited partnership, as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as Manager of WHISPERING PINES II DEVELOPMENT CORP., General Partner, and the free act and deed of WHISPERING PINES II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of and with the authority of said Limited Partnership, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court 1 Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 9 STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: ROCKY HILL July 9, 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, GARY E. KING, President-Executive Director of the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, duly authorized as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said Authority, before me. Notary Public LORRAINE G. CARISEO NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR.31,2002 Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 999 West Street Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 10 EXHIBIT A A certain piece or parcel of land situated rear of the northerly side of West Main Street and the westerly terminus of Bickford Drive in the Town of Avon, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, shown as"(Lot 2) Parcel 57-2"on a map entitled"Boundary Survey Map Of Land Conveyed To Whispering Pines II Associates Limited Partnership Bickford Drive Avon Connecticut Scale 1"=40' May 1999 Certified Substantially Correct Hodge Surveying Associates, P.C. Sheet 1 of 2",which map is to be filed in the office of the Avon Town Clerk, and being more particularly bound and described as follows: Beginning at a point,which point marks the southwesterly most corner of the premises described herein;thence running north 03' 36' 16"east,a distance of 161.87 feet to a monument found;thence running north 03'29' 38"east,a distance of 175.85 feet to a point;thence running north 03'24' 48"east,a distance of 242.59 feet to a monument found;thence running north 03' 27' 5.8"east, a distance of 137.96 feet to.a point;thence running south 79'47' 17"east, along "Fairview Subdivision",as shown on said map, a distance of 674.87 feet to a point;thence running south 09'22' 52"west, along land now or formerly of Ensign-Bickford Colporation, shown as "Lot 3 Parcel 57-3"on said map' a distance of 231.00 feet to a pin found;thence running north 75'42' 53"west,a distance of 80.79 feet to a pin found;thence running north 88' 59, 11"west,a distance of 48.50 feet to a pin found;thence running south 72°24' 59"west, a distance of 148.96 feet to a point;,thence running south 14' 13' 33"east, a distance of 146.49 feet to a point;thence running south 73° 24' 46"west,a distance of 98.08 feet to a point;thence running south 00'37' 07"west,a distance of 64.07 feet to a point;thence running south 72' 49' 3 8"west,a distance of 90.94 feet to a point; thence running south 71'46' 16"west, a distance of 269.36 feet to the point or place of beginning,the last eight courses being along land now or formerly of Avon Elderly Housing Limited Partnership,shown as"Lot 1 Parcel 57-1"on said map. Together with the following rights: 1. Access and utility easement rights as set forth in an Easement Agreement between Avon Elderly Housing Limited Partnership and Whispering Pines II Associates Limited Partnership dated December 17, 1998 and recorded in Volume 361 at Page 702 of the Avon Land Records. 2. Drainage easement rights as set forth in a Drainage Easement between Avon Care, LLC,Avon Elderly Housing Limited Partnership.and Ensign-Bickford Realty Corporation dated December 17, 1998 and recorded in Volume 363 at Page 506 of the Avon Land Records. 3. Signage easement rights as set forth in an Easement Agreement between Avon Elderly Housing Limited Partnership and Whispering Pines II Associates Limited Partnership dated December 17, 1998 and recorded in Volume 361 at Page 714 of the Avon Land Records. 4. Signage easement rights as set forth in an Easement Agreement between Ensign- Bickford Realty Corporation and Whispering Pines II Associates Limited Partnership dated December 17, 1998 and recorded in Volume 361 at Page 730 of the Avon Land Records. 5. Emergency access easement rights as set forth in an Easement from Ensign- Bickford Realty Corporation to Whispering Pines II Associates Limited Partnership dated December 17, 1998 and recorded in Volume 361 at Page 724 of the Avon Land Records. t TC-100C ReviseC /3/97 > CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY COMPLIANCE MONITORING: OWNER'S ANNUAL CERTIFICATION 1. My name is and my business address is: I 2 . I am the (Title) of the General Partner of , a Connecticut limited partnership. 3 . I hereby certify, (under the penalties of perjury) that, during the preceding calendar year: a. The project meets the requirements of either (check one) 20-50 test of IRC Sec. 42 (g) (1) (A) ; or 40-60 test of IRC Sec. 42 (g) (1) (B) ; or 15-40 test of IRC Sec. 42 (g) (4) . b. I have received an annual low-income certification from each low-income tenant and documentation supporting same on forms acceptable to the Authority. C. Each low-income unit in the project is rent-restricted under Section 42 (g) (2) of the IRC. d. All units in the project are for use by the general public on a non-transient basis. e. Each building in the project is suitable for occupancy in accordance with local health, safety and building codes . f. There has been no change in the eligible basis of any building for the year in the project. g. All tenant facilities included in eligible basis, such as swimming pools, other recreational facilities, and parking areas, are provided on a comparable basis without charge to all tenants in the building. h. If a low-income unit becomes vacant during the year, reasonable attempts are made to rent that unit to tenants having qualifying income and, while such unit is vacant, no units comparable or smaller in size are rented to tenants not having a qualifying income. i. If a low-income tenant's income increases above the limit allowed in IRC Section 42 (g) (2) (D) (ii) , the next available unit of comparable or smaller size in the project will be rented to tenants having qualifying income. j . The applicable fraction under Section 42 (c) (1) (B) has not changed from the prior year, or if changed, a description of the change is attached. k. An extended low-income housing commitment, as described in Section 42 (h) (6) , was in effect for the taxable year. 4 . The Project is in continuing compliance with the Extended Low- Income Housing Commitment executed by the undersigned. S . The Project is otherwise in compliance with the IRC, including any Treasury regulations pursuant thereto, the Qualified Allocation Plan, and all other applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances. 6 . I hereby certify that the foregoing statements are accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I will, if requested, submit documentation in support of such statements. Date: STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: COUNTY OF ) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public/Commissioner of the Superior Court * A CORPORATE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ABOVE SIGNATORY MUST BE ATTACHED. 2 - T C-100 Revised 1/15/98 ANNUAL INCOME CERTIFI6.' ION F-1 INITIAL CERTIFICATION RECERTIFICATION CATION EFFECTIVE DATE: I. DEVELOPMENT DATA: 1. 2. 3. PROJECT NAME BUILDING IDENTIFICATION# TOTAL#UNITS 4. 5. 6. .MEDIAN INCOME INCOME I =PER UTILITY ALLOWANCE FAMILY SIZE 7. 8. 9. MAXIMUM GROSS RENT FAMILY CONTRIBUTION/ APPLICABLE SET ASIDE NET RENT H. TENANT DATA: S LA : .:: _.IONSW X` 2 3 4 5 DI INCOME(USE ANNUAL AMOUNTS): .., .J 1T,.y. ........... .......... ................ .. ............ WOW .................... TOTAL M (G) (H) NCOME $ $ $ $ (J) TOTAL INCOME FROM ALL SOURCES: $ **The gross anticipated annual amount of social security,annuities,insurance policies,retirement funds,pensions,disability or death benefits and other similar types of periodic receipts including a lump-sum payment for the delayed start of a periodic payment. ***Also includes;(a)payments in lieu of earnings such as unemployment disability compensation,workers compesnations and serverance pay. (b) periodic and determinable allowances,such as alimony and child support payments,and regular contributions of gifts received from persons not residing in the unit. (c)all regular pay,special pay and allowances of a member of the armed forces(whiether or not living in the unit)who is head of household, spouse,or other person whose dependents are residing in the unit Do not include as income casual,sporadic or irregular gifts;amounts which are specifically for reimbursement of medical expenses;lump sum additions to family assets,such as inheritances,insurance payments(including payments under health and accident insurance and worker's compensation),capital gains and settlement for personal or property losses;amounts of educational scholarships paid directly to the student or the education institution,and amounts paid by the government to a veteran for use in meeting the costs of tuition,fees,books and equipment,but in either case only to the extent used for such purposes;special pay to a serviceman head of a family who is away from home and exposed to hostile fire; relocation payments under Title II of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970;foster child care payments; the value of coupon allotments for the purchase of food pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of 1964 which is in excess of the amount actually charged for the allotments;payments received pursuant to participation in Action volunteer programs;and income from the employment of children(including foster children)under the age of 18 years. TC-100 Revised 1/15/98 IV. Assets:* -...-T..UAL-`,--Y. E!A�, ASSETS P D !C . .........-......... SET B 1'::!:­ :'-;`­.'.....::. INCOME" ;,FROMAS TOTALS (E)$ (F)$ (G) TOTAL INCOME FROM ALL ASSETS: $ V. TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME(ITEM III(J)PLUS ITEM IV(G)): $ *If any of the occupants listed in Section II above has any savings,bonds,equity in real property,or other form of capital investment(but do not include necessary items such as furniture or automobiles),complete Section IV(A-G). Include the value over and above actual consideration received,except in foreclosure or bankruptcy,of any asset disposed of for less than fair market value within two years of the date of this Income Certification. If there are no assets indicate"0.00" on Line(G). VI. STATISTICAL DATA: MOVE UNIT: ............ E REM A 77 x .. ......... D� ATE:::: ............. b . . .... ........................... ............. ..... .... . .................I I ........ .. . .. ... ....... .......... ....... . .... .... .... . ...... .... .. I ........ .... . ........................ ....... .. ............... .... ... CHECK IF APPLICABLE (THERE IS A SPOUSE AND/OR UNIT IS LIHTC QUALIFIED) VII. STUDENT STATUS: (A) WILL ALL OF THE PERSONS LISTED IN SECTION II ABOVE BE,OR HAVE THEY BEEN,FULL-TIME STUDENTS DURING 5 MONTHS OF THIS CALENDAR YEAR AT AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(OTHER THAN A CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOL OR NIGHT SCHOOL)WITH REGULAR FACULTY AND STUDENTS? YES NO (B) IF THE ANSWER TO VII(A)IS YES,PLEASE CHECK THE APPLICABLE STATUS FROM THE LIST BELOW: MARRIED AND HAS FILED A JOINT TAX RETURN RECEIVING AFDC PAYMENTS PARTICIPATING IN A JOB TRAINING PROGRAM WITH ASSISTANCE RECEIVING SOCIAL SECURITY TITLE IV THE FULL TIME STUDENT IS A SINGLE PARENT WITH MINOR CHILDREN AND NONE OF THE TENANTS IS A DEPENDENT OF A THIRD PARTY. IF ANSWER TO(A)IS"YES"AND NONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS IN(B)ARE APPLICABLE,THE HOUSEHOLD IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RESIDE IN A LIHTC UNIT. IIWE CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT AND MY FAMILY IS ELIGIBLE TO LIVE IN THE DWELLING UNIT. (SIGNATURE OF LESSEE) (DATE) (SIGNATURE OF LESSEE) (DATE) VYARNING. IT IS A OFFENSE TO MAKE A WILLFULLY FALSE„ ........... .. DEPARTM T..-:��' ..T- ED T Tio ­"s -Q'AW-MA!77 ....... ......... TATESA -T SJMS STATEMENT' 1ION'TOANY' EN V� fflNi S REVIEWED BY: ►s SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY CHFA TAX COUNSEL H R-RA 8/8/00 COVENANT OF COMPLIANCE AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT This Covenant of Compliance And Regulatory Agreement (the "Agreement") made and entered into as of the day of August, 2000 by and between HUNTER'S RIDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, with an office and principal place of business at 10 Executive Drive, Farmington, Connecticut 06032 (the "Mortgagor" or "Declarant") and the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, a body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut, having its office and principal place of business at 999 West Street, Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067 (the "Authority" or"Mortgagee"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Mortgagor, as owner in fee simple of the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"), has applied to the Authority for a first mortgage loan in the amount of up to TWO MILLION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100THS ($2,225,000.00) DOLLARS (the "Mortgage Loan") to aid the Mortgagor in financing on the Property a multifamily rental housing development known as HUNTER'S RIDGE for persons of low and moderate income, pursuant to the provisions of the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority Act, Chapter 134 of the Connecticut General Statutes, Revision of 1958, as amended, ("Act") and of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code") and Regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended (the "Regulations"), identified as Authority Development No. 98022M (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, the Authority is unwilling to make the Mortgage Loan unless the Mortgagor shall be regulated in the manner set forth herein, and the Mortgagor is willing to execute and abide by this Agreement as a condition of obtaining the Mortgage Loan and receiving continuing benefits under the Act, the Code and the Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Authority as a condition of its willingness to make said Mortgage Loan requires that the Mortgagor shall, by entering into the terms, conditions and covenants set forth below, consent to be regulated and restricted by the Authority in the management and operation of the Development as herein provided and as provided by the Act, the Code and the Regulations, and any rules, regulations, policies, and Procedures of the Authority, now in effect or in effect in the future. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY This Agreement affects the Property which is described on Exhibit A. 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement, the terms below shall have the definitions set forth for each one: a: "Actual Cash Equity" means Mortgagor's cash equity in the Development, as verified by independent cost certification acceptable to the Authority, performed by an entity approved by the Authority; b. "Agreement" means this Covenant of Compliance and Regulatory Agreement by and between Mortgagor and the Authority concerning the Development; C. "Apartment Mix" means the apartment mix for the Qualified Units, as follows: Area Media o n Income 2 5/o or Less 50/o or Les s 60/o or Less 1 Bedroom 3 5 16 2 Bedrooms 0 0 27 d. "Approved Plans" means the plans, drawings and specifications described to the Authority's Board of Directors in the Resolution adopted March 31, 1999, as amended and accepted by the Authority; e. "Commitment Letter" means the Mortgage Loan commitment letter executed by and between the Mortgagor and the Authority, dated October 7, 1999, as amended; f. "Compliance Period" means with respect to any building, the period of fifteen (15) taxable years beginning with the first (1st) taxable year of the credit period with respect thereto, as defined in Section 42(i) (1) of the Code; g. "Construction Contract" means the general construction contract dated between Mortgagor and The Metro Construction Corporation, 10 Executive Drive, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, relating to the Development; h. "Declaration" means the Declaration and Agreement of Restrictive Covenants between Mortgagor and the Authority of even date herewith; i. "Default" means an Event of Default as defined in the Authority Mortgage (as hereinafter defined) and declared by the Authority in a written notice to the Mortgagor which is not corrected to the Authority's satisfaction after written notice and within the time allowed by the Authority Mortgage, or such further time as may be allowed by the Authority; j. "Development" shall consist of the facilities described in the drawings, plans and specifications submitted to the Authority and in the presentation to and resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority on March 31, 1999 and located on the Property; k. "Development Operations Account" means the account established pursuant to Paragraph 6 of this Agreement into which all Gross Revenues (as hereinafter defined) are deposited; I. "Distribution" means any withdrawal or taking of cash or any assets of the Mortgagor, including the segregation of cash or assets for subsequent withdrawal within the limitations of Paragraph 8 hereof, and excluding payments for Operating Expenses (as hereinafter defined) and for deposits to the Reserve for Replacements (as hereinafter defined); M. "Elderly" means fifty-five (55) years of age or older; n. "Extended Use Period" as defined in Section 42 (h) (6) (D) of the Code means the period of time (i) beginning on the first (1st) day in the Compliance Period on which such building is part of a qualified low-income housing project, and (ii) ending on the date which is fifteen (15) years after the close of the Compliance Period; o. "Fiscal Year" means the calendar year or any other period agreed to in writing by the parties hereto as the fiscal year for the Mortgagor; P. "Gross Revenues" means, with respect to a particular period of time, all amounts received by the Mortgagor during such period from rents and revenues or any other source (not including capital contributions by partners) in connection with and arising out of the operation of the Development; 2 q. "Income Limitation" means 25 percent, 50 percent or 60 percent of area median gross income, as the case may be, adjusted for family size, within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. For this purpose, income is determined as defined under HUD regulations at 24 CFR 813.106 (1987). r. "Mortgage Loan" means the $2,225,000 interest bearing obligation evidenced by a promissory note of even date herewith from Mortgagor to the Authority (the "Authority Note") and secured by a mortgage deed (the "Authority Mortgage") which Authority Mortgage shall constitute a first lien on the Development; S. "Mortgage Loan Documents" means, collectively, the Authority Note, the Authority Mortgage, Security Agreement; Declaration, Collateral Assignment of Leases and Rentals, Building Loan Agreement and this Agreement, all of even date herewith, along with the Commitment Letter, and all other documents executed by Mortgagor in connection with the Mortgage Loan; t. "Operating Expense(s)" means any expense(s) incurred by the Mortgagor which are reasonable and necessary for the sound operation and maintenance of the Development, including but not limited to: payments required under the Mortgage Loan, real estate taxes, payments in lieu of taxes, insurance premiums, utilities, fuel, management fees, repairs and other maintenance costs, trash and snow removal expenses, and any other similar expense required by or contemplated under the terms of this Agreement; U. "Qualified Persons" means elderly individuals and families who, at the time each such elderly individual or family first occupies a unit in the Development have annual income as set out in Section 2c. For this purpose, income is determined as defined under HUD regulations at 24 CFR 813.106 (1987). V. "Qualified Rent" means an annual gross rental not greater than 30 percent of the annual imputed Income Limitation applicable for such unit for each Qualified Person, in accordance with the Act, the Code and the Regulations; pursuant to Section 92 of the Code, the maximum rental limits applicable to Qualified Units shall be revised by a percentage equal to any percentage change in Area Median Income. Qualified Rent does not include any payment under Section 8 or any comparable rental assistance program (with respect to such Qualified Units or occupants thereof) and any equivalent rental payment under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 or fee for a supportive service as defined by the Code, but shall include any utility allowance applicable pursuant to the Code, after taking into account such determinations under such Section 8. W. "Qualified Unit" means a residential unit at the Development occupied, or available for occupancy, by a Qualified Person(s) at the Qualified Rent; X. "Reserve for Replacements" or "Reserve Fund" means the account established by the Mortgagor pursuant to Paragraph 7(d) of this Agreement; Y. "Residual Receipts" - see Paragraph 10j; Z. "State" means the State of Connecticut; aa.., "Surplus Cash" means funds remaining at the close of a Fiscal Year after: (1) The payment of: (a) All sums due or currently required to be paid under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or the Authority Note; (b) All amounts required to be deposited in the Reserve for ` Replacements; and i 3 (c) All obligations of the Development other than the Mortgage Loan to the Authority (including those due and/or payable within thirty (30) days after the end of a Fiscal Year, unless funds for payment are set aside or payment deferral has been accepted by the Authority); and (2) The segregation and recording of: (a) An amount equal to the aggregate of all special funds required to be maintained by the Mortgagor; The outstanding liability for tenant security deposits; and (c) all capital (equity) contributions by partners. 3. USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT The Declarant hereby covenants and represents to the Authority as follows: a. The Development - The Development shall consist of the facilities described in the Approved Plans and shall be located on the Property. b. Components of Development - The Development shall consist of a building or buildings or structure or several proximate and interrelated buildings or structures owned by the same person(s) for tax purposes, located on a single tract of land and financed under a common plan of finance, and facilities functionally related and subordinated thereto: 1: each building or structure containing one or more similarly constructed units, having separate and complete facilities for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for a single person or a family, and facilities which are functionally related and subordinate to such units; and 2. all of the residential units of which shall be rented or available on a non-transient basis for rental to members of the general public, shall be suitable for residential occupancy, and shall comply with all State and local health, safety and building codes. C. Completion - The Declarant shall proceed with due diligence to complete the Development. d. Change in Development - The Declarant shall make no change in the nature, size (including number of residential units) or location of the Development from that which was shown on the Approved Plans, as modified to date, without the prior written consent of the Authority. e. Continuous Rental Restriction - The Declarant shall, on a continuous basis, maintain fifty-one (51) units in the Development as rented or available for rental to elderly members of the general public during the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period. f. Low and Moderate Income Restriction 1. During the term of the Authority Mortgage, the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period, fifty-one (51) of the units in the Development shall be Qualified Units in accordance with the Apartment Mix. All calculations of income and area median gross income shall be determined in a manner consistent with determinations of lower income families under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended. 4 2. After initial occupancy by Qualified Persons but upon again becoming vacant, a unit shall be treated as occupied by Qualified Persons until occupied, other than for a temporary period by another occupant, at which time the character of the unit shall be redetermined by the new occupant's income. In no event shall a temporary period exceed thirty (30) days. A unit occupied by an individual or family who, at the commencement of occupancy, was a Qualified Person shall be treated as occupied by a Qualified Person during such individual's or family's tenancy in such unit, even if such individual's or family's income exceeds 140 percent of the applicable Income Limitation at the time of the most recent income Determination (as described in Paragraph 4 below), if after such Determination, but before the next Determination, any residential unit of comparable or smaller size is occupied by a ne\,V resident who is a Qualified Person. 3. As required by the Authority, the Declarant shall make a determination on the basis of current income (the "Determination") of whether the income of an individual or family residing in a unit of the Development exceeds the then applicable Income Limitation. As required by the Authority, the Declarant shall certify compliance with the Low and Moderate Income Restriction (as defined below) to the Authority and to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, if required (at such times and in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe). 4. The Declarant shall furnish to the Authority, on at least an annual basis or on some other basis as determined by the Authority to be required by the Act, the Code and the Regulations, such information as the Authority shall require, including any compliance forms required to be filed with the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Authority, including the "Compliance Monitoring: Owner's Annual Certification", attached hereto as Exhibit B, and to maintain on file Tenant Income Certifications, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C (or such other form as may be accepted by the Authority, in order to permit verification that the covenants set forth herein are being satisfied by the Declarant and to take such action as the Authority shall deem necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. The Declarant shall use tenant lease forms acceptable to the Authority, or, if there are no written leases, written and signed certifications of tenants so as to be able to determine the qualifications of the tenant or take such other corrective action as is necessary to comply with the covenants herein or to correct or cure any failure of the Declarant to comply with the covenants herein. Such leases or certifications shall contain clauses wherein each tenant certifies as to the accuracy of statements made in the Tenant Income Certification and agrees that family income and other eligibility requirements shall be deemed substantial and material obligations of his or her tenancy, that he or she shall comply with all requests for information with respect thereto from the Declarant or the Authority, and that failure to provide accurate information on the Tenant Income Certification or refusal to comply with a request for information with respect thereto shall be deemed a violation of a substantial and material obligation of his or her tenancy for which termination of the tenancy shall be a remedy. The various terms, restrictions and conditions of this subparagraph collectively constitute the "Low and Moderate Income Restriction." g. Use - Declarant understands and agrees that the Development shall be used only for multifamily residential rental housing within the meaning of the Act, the Code and the Regulations, as amended, used for the benefit of those members of the general public of low and moderate income upon certain terms and conditions. Declarant hereby covenants and represents to the Authority as follows: 1. During the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period, the Development shall set aside fifty-one (51) of the units (the "Qualified Units") for Qualified Persons at the Qualified Rent. 5 2. The Qualified Units shall remain subject to the Low and Moderate Income Restriction, for a period of thirty (30) years beyond the term of the Mortgage Loan. 3. The covenants and representations of the Mortgagor contained herein shall survive any sale, transfer, or other disposition of all or any portion of the Development by the Mortgagor or the repayment of the Mortgage Loan, and shall be binding upon the Mortgagor's successors and assigns, but may be waived by the Authority in its sole discretion upon the event of involuntary noncompliance caused by fire, seizure, requisition, foreclosure, change in a Federal law or an action of a Federal agency which prevents the Authority from enforcing the,- requirements hereof, or condemnation or similar event. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, the covenants and representations of the Mortgagor herein shall survive a foreclosure, transfer of title by deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar event if, at any time during the Compliance Period, the Mortgagor or a related party (as defined in Section 1.103-10(e) of the Regulations) obtains an ownership interest in the Development for Federal tax purposes; and 4. In the event that the Development shall at any time prior to the termination of the Extended Use Period be converted to a common interest community, such conversion shall include in the declaration of common interest community an affirmative covenant running with the land, and such common interest community shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which covenant shall bind the common interest community association, the common interest community unit owner and their respective successors and assigns, to the restrictions contained in this Agreement. Said covenant shall also require that no fewer than the number of units required, which units shall be designated and identified in the said declaration of common interest community either by unit number or other description, shall be sold, or held vacant for sale, only to individuals or families who are of low income, as determined by the Authority or its successors at the time of such sale. The covenant shall be binding upon the common interest community association, its successors and assigns to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, for the benefit of, in favor of and enforceable by the Authority, or its successors and assigns as their interests may appear; and said declaration of common interest community shall require that all units that are to be sold or available for sale to Qualified Persons, shall also be subject to the further restriction that no reconveyance of any such units shall be made unless and until the seller of such unit receives a certification in recordable form acceptable to the Authority or its successors or its nominee that the prospective purchaser is a Qualified Person at the time of the proposed conveyance. The Authority or its successors or nominee shall designate a party to issue such a certification of low income and shall notify the common interest community, from time to time, of the identity of such party. A unit may not be conveyed pursuant to a time-sharing plan as defined in Chapter 734b of the Connecticut General Statutes. 5. In the event of a partial destruction or condemnation of the Development which is not substantial, as determined by the Authority in its sole discretion, and if such destruction or condemnation is not repaired or corrected to the satisfaction of the Authority, then the remaining units in the Development shall be allocated, on the same basis described above, to Qualified Persons. If the Development is not rebuilt or corrected for any reason after substantial destruction or condemnation of the Development, as determined by the Authority in its sole discretion, then the Declarant shall have the right to request, and the Authority shall, so long as any applicable insurance proceeds have not been delivered to the Declarant, release and waive the Declarant and the Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. Upon such destruction or condemnation, the Authority, or its successor(s) or nominee, shall execute appropriate documents for the Declarant, its successors or assigns to record on the 1 6 land records for the City or Town where the Development is located rescinding the restrictions contained herein, if the Authority elects to so release and waive the Declarant and the Property from the terms, restrictions and conditions contained herein. In the event that the Authority delivers the said insurance proceeds to the Declarant, and the Declarant is required to repair or reconstruct the Development pursuant to the terms of the Mortgage Loan, then the restrictions and covenants herein shall remain in full force and effect. 6. As required by the Authority, in every Fiscal Year during the Compliance Period and the Extended Use Period or until the Authority Mortgage has been released, whichever period is longer, the Declarant shall deliver to the Authority, in a form approved by the Authority, a certified schedule of units occupied by Qualified Persons. The Authority shall have the right to observe the Development and the Declarant's records regarding tenants and tenant selection policy at any time, and to request and receive any information, documentation, or other confirmation that Declarant's tenant selection policy complies with the requirements of the Authority. 7. To the extent necessary to comply with the Act, the Code and the Regulations, and the Authority's Procedures, including but not limited to the Qualified Allocation Plan and Application Process Procedures, the Authority shall have the right to take any and all actions which it deems appropriate, to rent any unleased or vacant dwelling unit in the Development (if the Property is used for rental units), including without limitation thereof the right to the appointment of a receiver to enter upon and take possession of the Development, to enter into tenant leases, to collect all rents, revenues, issues, income, products and profits thereof and apply the same as the court may direct or to seek any remedy available or necessary for the enforcement of the covenants and restrictions herein. The receiver shall have the rights and powers permitted under the laws of the State and such other powers as the court making such appointment shall confer. h. Low Income Housing Tax Credit Restrictive Covenant - Declarant hereby covenants to comply with Section 42 of the Code regarding the low income housing tax credit, including but not limited to, the Compliance Period, Extended Use Period and the Extended Low-Income Housing Commitment executed by Declarant and the Authority, which is incorporated herein by reference. i. Audit - The Development and all equipment, buildings, plans, offices, apparatus, devices, books, contracts, records, documents and other papers relating thereto shall at all times be maintained in reasonable condition for proper audit and shall be subject to examination, inspection and copying upon prior notice at any reasonable time by the Authority or by its authorized representative. j. Maintenance - Mortgagor shall maintain the Development in a decent, safe, and sanitary condition and in a good state of repair as determined by the Authority in its sole discretion. 4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Mortgagor shall provide for the professional management of the Development in a manner acceptable to the Authority, shall employ a Management Agent, and shall develop a Management Plan acceptable to the Authority. Any management agreement with a property manager (the "Management Agent") entered into by Mortgagor involving the Development shall be accepted in writing in advance by the Authority and contain a provision that it is subject to termination, without penalty and with or without cause, upon written request by the Authority. Any notice of termination shall be addressed to Mortgagor and shall incorporate by reference the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of such notice, Mortgagor shall terminate the said management agreement within a period of not more than thirty (30) days and shall make immediate 7 alternative arrangements reasonably satisfactory to the Authority for continuing proper management of the Development. If Mortgagor fails to so terminate and appoint a new Management Agent reasonably satisfactory to the Authority within said thirty (30) days, then the Authority shall designate a new Management Agent and Mortgagor shall execute the management agreement acceptable to the Authority. If the Mortgagor itself manages the Development, the Authority may reasonably require Mortgagor to enter into a management agreement with an independent Management Agent at a rate and on terms and conditions approved by the Authority. Mortgagor hereby constitutes and appoints the Authority its true and lawful attorney-in-fact, coupled with an interest, with full power of substitution for such purpose. Mortgagor hereby empowers said attorney-in-fact to execute a management agreement with a Management Agent acceptable to the Authority and to do any and every act which Mortgagor might do on its own behalf under such management agreement, as owner of the Development. This power of attorney may not be revoked during the term of this Agreement. 5. PAYMENT RESTRICTION FOR SERVICES, ETC. Payment for services, supplies or materials relating to the Development shall not exceed the amount ordinarily paid for such services, supplies or materials in the area where the services are rendered or the supplies or materials are furnished. 6. DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS ACCOUNT Mortgagor shall deposit Gross Revenues with a depository in the State accepted by the Authority, in a Development Operations Account. The Authority shall at all times be advised of the name and number of each account and the bank or financial institution in which such account is maintained. Funds shall be disbursed from the Development Operations Account, to the extent available, as follows: a. first, for all Operating Expenses; b. second, for required deposits to the Reserve for Replacements; C. third, to the extent of Surplus Cash, for Distributions pursuant to Paragraph 8 1(1) of this Agreement; and d. fourth, with the prior written approval of the Authority, for amenities or design modifications to the Development which: (1) are necessary or desirable for the marketing of the Development; (2) shall reduce maintenance or replacement costs over a substantial portion of the term of the Mortgage Loan; (3) shall benefit a substantial portion of the residents of the Development by providing necessary or desirable social services that shall improve the health, education, opportunity, security and general welfare of such residents; or (4) shall make an important contribution to the livability of the Development. 7. DEPOSITS Mortgagor shall pay, deposit or deliver the following to the Authority as set out below: a. A non-refundable commitment fee, payable upon Mortgagor's execution of the Commitment Letter, in the amount of THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT AND 00/100THS ($38,938.00) DOLLARS which commitment fee is in full consideration for the making of the commitment by the Authority and the reservation of the Mortgage Loarr amount for the term of the Commitment Letter and which sum shall be deemed earned by the Authority when paid. b. A good faith and working capital deposit delivered to the Authority at substantial completion of work on the Development, as determined by the Authority. The good faith and working capital deposit is ONE HUNDRED NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FORTY AND 00/100THS 8 ($109,240.00) DOLLARS, in cash or in the form of an irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit in form and content and issued by a financial institution, satisfactory to the Authority, which shall name the Authority as the sole beneficiary thereof. Proceeds of this deposit shall be governed by the Good Faith and Working Capital Escrow and Deposit Agreement of even date, which is incorporated herein by reference. Such deposit shall not constitute a loan by the Mortgagor. It shall not be used if the net income of the Development is sufficient to cover such costs and expenses and, in any case, shall not be used without the approval of the Authority. C. Assurance of completion of the work at the Development in the form of (i) an irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit, in form and content and issued by a financial institution satisfactory to the Authority, which shall be delivered to the Authority at Initial Closing (as set out in the Commitment Letter) in the amount of SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO AND 00/100 ($764,622.00) DOLLARS which shall name only the Authority as the beneficiary thereof. At delivery of the completed General Contractor's Cost Certification, and with the prior written approval of the Authority, Mortgagor may reduce said letter of credit to an amount of THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED ELEVEN AND 00/100 ($382,311.00) DOLLARS, which letter of credit as reduced shall remain in effect for a period of fifteen (15) months from the date of the issuance of permanent certificate(s) of occupancy for the entire Development or (ii) in lieu of said letter of credit, 100% Performance and Labor and Material Bonds ("Bonds") issued by a surety acceptable to the Authority. Failure to maintain such letter of credit or Bonds in the amount required shall be an event of default pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Documents. d. Concurrently with the commencement of amortization of the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, the Mortgagor shall establish and thereafter maintain a Reserve for Replacements out of Gross Revenues by depositing to such Reserve Fund with the Authority, from the Development Operations Account, an amount in each month determined by multiplying the gross monthly rent by a percentage to be calculated at the time of the Final Closing (as set out in the Commitment Letter), unless a different rate or amount is approved or directed in writing by the Authority or unless forbearance of payment is authorized by the Authority in writing. The Reserve Fund plus any interest or other earnings thereon, whether in the form of a cash deposit or reinvestment in obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States of America or an agency thereof or the State, shall at all times be under the sole control of the Authority. The Authority shall permit disbursements from the Reserve Fund only for the purpose of effecting replacement of structural elements and mechanical equipment of the Development or for improvements thereto. Such disbursements shall only be made upon the written direction or consent of the Authority. In the event of an Event of Default under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or this Agreement, the Authority may apply or authorize the application of the balance in the Reserve Fund to the amount due on the Mortgage Loan, or at its option, may elect to maintain the Reserve Fund for its established purposes. The Authority shall have no liability for deficiencies in the Reserve for Replacements or the Development Operations Account arising from Mortgagor's failure to timely or adequately fund deposits therein. e: Any reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees arising in preparation for the Initial Closing or Final Closing of the Mortgage Loan. 8. CERTAIN ACTS PROHIBITED Mortgagor shall not, without the prior written approval of the Authority: a. Sell, convey (including transition, conveyance or transfer to a limited liability company), assign, transfer, lease (except for apartment leases on the form lease accepted by the Authority) or further encumber any interest in or any 1 9 part of the Property, nor shall a voluntary sale, pledge or other transfer of any beneficial interest in Mortgagor be effected, provided that the sale of limited partnership interests and substitution of general partners upon the death or disability of a general partner, in accordance with Mortgagor's partnership agreement and as accepted by the Authority, shall not be deemed to constitute a sale, conveyance, assignment or transfer for purposes of this paragraph; b. Assign, pledge, transfer, dispose of or encumber any personal property of the Development, including rents, or pay out any funds, except for reasonable Operating Expenses and necessary repairs to the Development; C. Convey, assign, pledge, or transfer any right to receive the rents and/or profits from the Development; d. Remodel, add to, reconstruct, demolish or damage any part of the Development after the issuance of permanent certificates of occupancy, or subtract from any real or personal property of the Development; e. Engage, except for natural persons, in any other business or activity, including the operation of any other housing development, or incur any liability or obligation not connected with the Development; f. Require, as a condition of the occupancy or leasing of any unit in the Development, any consideration or deposit other than the prepayment of the first month's rent plus a security deposit in an amount not in excess of two (2) months' rent, as permitted by law, to guarantee the tenant's performance of the lease. Any funds collected as security deposits shall be kept separate and apart from all other funds of the Development in a trust account with a federally insured depository within the State, approved in writing by the Authority, the amount of which shall at all times equal or exceed the aggregate of all outstanding security deposit obligations of the Development. If interest is earned on said trust account, it shall be transferred, as earned, into the Development Operations Account, except as otherwise required by law; g. Permit the use of the dwelling accommodations of the Development for any purpose except as residential rental dwelling units; h. Incur any liability, direct or contingent, other than for current Operating Expenses, exclusive of the Mortgage Loan and any deferred Developer Fee (as may be set out in the Commitment Letter); i. Pay any compensation, including wages or salaries, or incur any obligations to staff or any officers, directors, stockholders, trustees, partners, beneficiaries under a trust, or to any of their nominees; j. Enter into any contract or contracts for supervisory or managerial services; k. Invest or deposit any funds from the Development in any property (real, personal or mixed), except obligations of, or fully guaranteed or secured as to principal by, the United States of America, or any agency thereof, the State, or obligations thereof, or deposit such funds in a depository not approved by the Authority; I. Make, receive or retain any Distribution except on the following conditions, provided that no Distribution shall occur without the prior written approval of an authorized officer of the Authority: (1) All Distributions shall be made only after the end of each Fiscal Year and subsequent to audited financial statements approved by the Authority. All Distributions in any one Fiscal Year shall be limited to 10 percent of the Mortgagor's Actual Cash Equity and be allowed only when the Authority, in its sole discretion, determines that the 10 Development and operation thereof meet the following criteria to its satisfaction: A. Management - The Development shall be operated in a manner consistent with Authority standards as described in the management plan approved by the Authority. B. Financial Condition - The Development shall be operated in a financial manner which allows the Development to pay all obligations, fund all reserves as required and demonstrate an ability to be consistent in this manner throughout the Fiscal Year. M• C. Physical Condition - The Development shall be maintained in good physical condition as demonstrated by the Authority's physical observation. The Development shall not have any physical impediments which shall require financing from sources other than the Reserve for Replacements. D. Low-Moderate Income - No Distribution shall cause rents to be raised on any Qualified Unit to a level which would prohibit the rental of the unit to Qualified Persons at the Qualified Rent. Rents shall be established to meet the objectives described in this Agreement. E. Market Conditions - Distributions shall be a function of market conditions. Market conditions shall be considered in establishing rental schedules. F. The right to Distributions shall be cumulative and payable from Surplus Cash, if any, at the end of successive Fiscal Years subsequent to Authority approval of audited financial statements for such Fiscal Years. (2) No Distribution shall be made from borrowed funds prior to the completion of work at the Development in accordance with the Construction Contract and the drawings, plans and specifications accepted by the Authority, or when there is any Event of Default (as defined in the Authority Mortgage); (3) Distribution of any funds arising out of the operation of the Development, to a party not entitled to receive such funds hereunder, shall be held in trust by said party separate and apart from any other funds; and (4) No Distribution shall be made until there shall have been compliance with all outstanding notices or requirements for proper maintenance and operation of the Development. (5) Nothing in this Agreement or in any other Mortgage Loan Document shall be deemed to prohibit or restrict payments to Mortgagor's partners of any cash that has been contributed to Mortgagor by the partners, including without limitation, "credit adjuster advances" and "fee guarantee advances" (as such terms are defined in Mortgagor's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated ). No prior written approval of the Authority shall be required for any such payments, except that if such funds are advanced from Gross Revenues they may only be advanced from annual Surplus Cash, as defined in this Agreement and set forth in the annual audited Financial Statement and line 13c, Form HUD 93486 (8/95) "Computation of Surplus ' Cash, Distributions, and Residual Receipts" (see attached ) which Surplus Cash has been acknowledged and approved by the Authority. 11 (m) Terminate, assign or transfer any right to manage the Development (except in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement); (n) Make a loan of any funds from the Development to any person or entity; (o) Incur any liability or obligation in connection with the Development, contingent or otherwise, with the exception of current Operating Expenses and for the indebtedness evidenced by the Authority Note, or other financing(s) accepted by the Authority; or incur any liability or obligation whatsoever that is secured in whole or in part by any interest in or lien or encumbrances on the Development, or funds of the Development; or (p) Require tenants to pay any mandatory charges for additional services or facilities. 9. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS a. Unless another period for reporting is specified by the Authority in writing, Mortgagor shall furnish the Authority with occupancy reports and reports of income, expenses, accounts receivable and accounts payable on a quarterly basis. Mortgagor shall pay such penalty as may be,imposed by the Authority in the event of failure to comply with this requirement. Such reports shall be provided no later than the 15th day of each month. Mortgagor shall also provide such additional information as the Authority may reasonably request from time to time relative to the ownership, operation and maintenance of the Development. b. Within sixty (60) days following the close of each Fiscal Year of the Development, Mortgagor shall furnish the Authority with a complete annual financial report prepared and certified by a certified public accountant for the Development based upon an examination of the books and records of the Mortgagor, containing a detailed, itemized statement of Gross Revenues, Operating Expenses, Surplus Cash, Distributions, and all other income and expenditures, prepared and certified to be in accordance with the Procedures and standards approved by the Authority and in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis, and further certified by a duly authorized agent of the Mortgagor. C. Annually, not later than sixty (60) days before the beginning of each Fiscal Year, Mortgagor shall submit to the Authority an itemized budget of Gross Revenues, Operating Expenses, Surplus Cash and Distributions for the following Fiscal Year. Such budget shall be accompanied by supporting documentation requested by the Authority. Upon acceptance by the Authority, such budget shall be the Development's budget for the ensuing Fiscal Year. d. All records, accounts, books, tenant lists, applicant waiting lists, documents, and contracts relating to the Development shall at all times be kept separate and identifiable from those of any other business of the Mortgagor which is unrelated to the Development and shall be maintained within the State, as required by the Authority from time to time, in a reasonable condition for proper audit and subject to examination during business hours by representatives of the Authority. 10. ESTABLISHMENT OF RENTS - QUALIFICATIONS OF TENANTS Mortgagor further covenants and agrees that: a. With the prior written approval of the Authority, Mortgagor shall establish and maintain for each dwelling unit at the Development a rental charge which shall satisfy the requirements of the Act, the Code and the Regulations, and this Agreement, and provide income to the Development sufficient for the payment of principal, interest, fees and charges to the Authority under the Authority Mortgage and Authority Note. 12 b. On forms approved by the Authority, Mortgagor shall obtain a certification of income from each prospective tenant, prior to execution of a lease and admission to the Development as a tenant. C. Mortgagor shall obtain written evidence substantiating the information given on the tenants' certifications of income in a manner prescribed by the Authority and shall maintain on file for the Authority's review a copy of such evidence. Mortgagor agrees that no person has been approved or shall be approved for occupancy of a Qualified Unit, nor shall any person be permitted to occupy any Qualified Unit in the Development or any portion thereof, without such person's application for occupancy having first been reviewed by or on behalf of the Authority, except that no such lease approval or submission shall be required with regard to leases of one dwelling unit within the Property for terms not in excess of one (1) year unless requested in writing by Mortgagee subject to the requirements of Section 42 of the Code. d. Mortgagor shall require all tenants to execute a lease in the form prescribed or accepted by the Authority. (1) In the case of Qualified Units, Mortgagor shall require the execution of a lease which shall provide for an annual certification of income by the tenant and for termination of the lease and eviction of an individual or family for violation of the eligibility requirements, as constituting material non-compliance under the lease. Said lease form shall also prohibit the assignment of the lease or subleasing of the unit to persons other than those approved by the Mortgagor as meeting the eligibility requirements. (2) No unit in the Development shall be rented for less than one (1) year nor more than two (2) years without the Authority's prior approval. e. No changes shall be made in the rental charges approved by the Authority, except as may be adjusted in the annual budget approved in writing by the Authority. f. Mortgagor shall not permit a tenant to rent more than one (1) residential dwelling unit at any given time without the prior written approval of the Authority. g. Mortgagor shall obtain prior written approval of the Authority for: (1) all documents used in renting the dwelling units and any commercial facilities including but not limited to lease forms, applications and personal histories; (2) all advertising and other public information regarding the Development; and (3) all procedures and standards to be utilized regarding approval or rejection of prospective tenants. h. Mortgagor shall grant to the Authority the right to execute leases on behalf of the Mortgagor from time to time for all fifty-one (51) Qualified Units in the Development with Qualified Persons, upon the sole determination by the Authority that the exercise of this right is necessary to preserve compliance with the Code regarding low income housing tax credits allocated to the Development. In that event, the Authority shall be deemed an agent for the Mortgagor and shall deposit Gross Revenues into the Development Operations Account. i. Any Surplus Cash remaining after Distributions permitted under Paragraph 8 1(1) above, and payment in accordance with the Authority Note shall be considered "Residual Receipts" and shall be paid to and held by the Authority and deposited in an interest-bearing account approved by and in the name of the Authority. The Authority or its successor or assign shall own and maintain sole ownership and control of funds deposited in the Residual Receipts account at all times. Residual Receipts shall be disbursed only on the direction of the Authority, which shall have the power 13 and authority to direct that the Residual Receipts, or any part thereof, be used for such purpose as it may determine to benefit the Development. Upon payment in full of the Mortgage Loan, this Section 10i shall terminate. j. All rents received by the Mortgagor in excess of the maximum rents permitted or in excess of those rents established for Qualified Units shall be paid over by Mortgagor to the Authority. k. Mortgagor shall comply with the Authority's insurance requirements as set out in the Authority Mortgage. '11. NON DISCRIMINATION M Mortgagor shall comply with all requirements imposed by Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Executive Order 11063, to the end that in accordance with the Act, the Code and the Regulations, and said Executive Order, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, membership in a class, ancestry, marital status, physical disability and mental disability, be refused or denied housing, or otherwise subjected to discrimination. In addition, Mortgagor shall comply with all State and local laws prohibiting discrimination in housing, including without limitation, laws prohibiting discrimination ,on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, membership in a class, ancestry, marital status, physical disability and mental disability. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Mortgagor shall not restrict occupancy or rental of dwelling units in the Development by reason of the fact that a prospective tenant's household includes children (except for senior citizen housing as may be allowed under applicable law). Failure or refusal to comply with any such provisions, within any cure period that may be provided by law, shall be a proper basis for the Authority to take any corrective action it may deem necessary including, but not limited to, declaring an Event of Default under the Authority Mortgage, the rejection of future applications for mortgage loans and the refusal to enter into future contracts of any kind with which the Mortgagor or its shareholders, members, partners, trustees or beneficiaries are in any way identified. Mortgagor shall not discriminate against tenants or applicants who are recipients of Federal rent subsidies pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, or any successor subsidy program. 12. ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND INCOME As security for the payments due under this Agreement, for the Reserve for Replacements and for the other obligations under the Mortgage Loan, Mortgagor assigns and pledges to the Authority, its rights to the rents, profits, income and charges of whatever sort which it may receive or be entitled to receive in connection with the operation of the Development. Unless an Event of Default has occurred, permission is granted to Mortgagor to collect and retain such rents, profits, income, and other payments. 13. BANKRUPTCY - REORGANIZATION Mortgagor shall not file any petition in' bankruptcy or for reorganization or recomposition, or make any assignment for the benefit of creditors or to a trustee for creditors or permit an adjudication in bankruptcy, the taking possession of the Development or any part thereof by a receiver, or the seizure and sale of the Development or any part thereof under judicial process or pursuant to any power of sale. Failure to have such adverse action set aside within sixty (60) days shall constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement and under the Authority Mortgage. 14. LITIGATION AGAINST MORTGAGOR Mortgagor agrees promptly to notify the Authority in writing of any suits by or against Mortgagor, the Authority or the Development. No litigation seeking the recovery of a sum in excess of $5,000.00 nor any action for specific performance or other equitable relief shall be instituted nor shall any claim for a sum in excess of $5,000.00 or suit for specific performance be settled or compromised by Mortgagor unless prior written 14 consent thereto has been obtained from the Authority. Such consent may be subject to such terms and conditions as the Authority may, in its sole discretion, prescribe. 15. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS In order to comply with the Act, the Code and the Regulations and applicable statutes and regulations, Mortgagor agrees that, throughout the period defined in Paragraph 3, all of the Qualified Units in the Development shall be rented to Qualified Persons at a rental not in excess of Qualified Rent. Mortgagor shall comply with State and federal laws and requirements, and the Authority's policies and Procedures. In addition and without limitation thereto, Mortgagor shall agree to the Apartment Mix and shall provide a marketing plan acceptable to the Authority. a. Prior to completion of the renovation work at the Development, the Mortgagor shall advertise the availability of apartment units in manners reasonably calculated to reach Qualified Persons. All advertisements shall be accepted by the Authority prior to placement with any of the media. The Mortgagor shall verify the income of each applicant for Qualified Units. b. Mortgagor agrees that on and after the date of notification by the Authority to Mortgagor with respect to the availability of subsidy funds, it shall not reject an applicant for a rental who, except for lack of adequate income, is acceptable as a tenant. Mortgagor shall submit the application of such prospective tenant to the Authority for consideration by the Authority of the granting of a subsidy to such a prospective tenant during the term of the lease. The Authority may submit to Mortgagor the names of applicants for occupancy as tenants, and Mortgagor shall review the application(s) and interview such prospective tenants. C. Following initial occupancy, Qualified Units vacated by Qualified Persons shall be rented only to other Qualified Persons in order to maintain the Apartment Mix. Mortgagor may modify the allocation and distribution of Qualified Units so reserved only with the prior written permission of the Authority. Any such modification shall be carried out so that at all times, the Qualified Units shall be occupied by (or previously occupied by and available for rental solely to) Qualified Persons. If at any time during the term of a lease, a Qualified Person in possession of a unit ceases to be a Qualified Person, such tenant shall be entitled to remain in such unit until the end of the lease term, and thereafter, the unit shall be leased to a Qualified Person. d. Mortgagor represents and warrants that at all times its acts in connection with the Development have complied with and shall continue to comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local laws, and all agreements with the Authority and any other public entities concerning the Development as amended from time-to-time. The Mortgagor also represents to the Authority that professional advice is available to the Mortgagor for the purpose of enabling the Mortgagor to be aware of, and to comply with, said laws, policies, procedures and agreements. The Mortgagor shall indemnify the Authority against any loss incurred by the Authority as a result of the Mortgagor's failure to comply therewith. Mortgagor acknowledges the existence of federal, state and local laws regarding handicapped accessibility and the relocation of persons displaced by the Development. Mortgagor agrees that the Mortgagor, and not the Authority, is responsible for complying with such laws, as they may apply to the Development. 16. CONTRADICTORY REQUIREMENTS Mortgagor warrants that it has not, and shall not, execute other agreements with provisions contradictory, or in opposition to the provisions hereof, and that in any event the requirements of this Agreement are paramount and controlling and shall supersede any other requirements in conflict therewith except as provided below. Notwithstanding 15 the foregoing, Mortgagor acknowledges that a purpose of this Agreement is to compel and document compliance with provisions of the Act, the Code and the Regulations applicable to Qualified Residential Rental Projects, and to the extent that any provision hereof is now or shall become in conflict with any such provision of the Act, the Code and the Regulations, such provision of the Act, the Code and the Regulations shall prevail. Mortgagor shall comply with all provisions of the Code and Regulations applicable to Qualified Residential Rental Projects, whether or not such provisions are specifically set forth herein. Mortgagor further acknowledges that the representations and covenants set forth herein are based upon the Code and Regulations in their present form, and that both may be amended and the interpretations of their respective provisions may be changed or clarified in a manner inconsistent with the provisions hereof. Mortgagor agrees that it shall use its best efforts to take such actions, or to refrain from taking such actions, as are authorized by law and as may be necessary for the Development to continue to constitute a Qualified Residential Rental Project as may be required by the Code or Regulations as either may be amended or as the interpretation of their respective provisions may be changed or clarified. 17. FURTHER ACTION AND ASSURANCES Mortgagor shall do, execute, acknowledge and deliver, at its sole cost and .expense, such further acts, instruments or documentation as the Authority may reasonably require from time to time to better assure, transfer and confirm unto the Authority the rights now or hereafter intended to be granted to the Authority under this Agreement. 18. PARTNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS a. No amendments shall be made to the Mortgagor's partnership agreement and such partnership agreement shall not be terminated without the Authority's prior written approval other than amendments that merely reflect transfers of the limited partner's interest made in accordance with Section of the Mortgagor's partnership agreement; b. In the event of the dissolution or other change in the partnership, Mortgagor's business shall be continued by the partners individually until a successor structure is formed and approved by the Authority; and C. No general partner shall voluntarily withdraw from the Mortgagor's partnership without the Authority's prior written approval except as provided in Section 1.07 of the Authority Mortgage. 19. PERSONAL LIABILITY Mortgagor shall remain personally liable only as set forth in the Authority Mortgage. 20. REMEDIES a. Upon violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement by Mortgagor, the Authority may give written notice thereof to Mortgagor by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, or such other address(es) as may subsequently be supplied by appropriate written notice to the Authority. If such violation is not corrected to the satisfaction of the Authority within thirty (30) days after the date such notice is mailed or within such further time as the Authority in its sole discretion may permit, the Authority without further notice, may declare that an Event of Default has occurred— Upon such default, the Authority may resort to one, all or any combination of the following courses of action: i. declare the whole of the indebtedness under the Authority Note immediately due and payable and proceed with the foreclosure of the Authority Mortgage; ii. collect or cause to be collected all rents and charges in connection with the operation of the Development and use such collections or cause such 16 collections to be used to pay such Mortgagor's obligations under this Agreement and under the Authority Mortgage and the necessary expenses of preserving and operating the Development; iii. take possession of the Development, bring any action necessary to enforce any rights of Mortgagor growing out of the operation of the Development, and operate the Development in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and in compliance with the requirements of the Mortgage Loan; iv. apply to any court for specific performance of this Agreement, for an injunction against any violation of this Agreement, for the appointment of a receiver to take over and operate the Development in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, or for such other renef as may be appropriate, since the injury to the Authority arising from a default under any of the terms of this Agreement would be irreparable and the amount of damages would be difficult to ascertain; and V. seek any other remedy permitted under the Mortgage Loan Documents. b. Any action(s) taken by the Authority shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued independently, singly, successively, together or otherwise, at such time and in such order as the Authority may determine in its sole discretion, to the fullest extent permitted by law, without impairing or otherwise affecting the other rights and remedies of the Authority permitted by law, equity or contract or as set forth herein or in the Mortgage Loan Documents. 21. CONTINUING EFFECT The parties agree that this Agreement .shall continue in full force and effect throughout the applicable period in Paragraph 3 hereof to the extent necessary to comply with the Act, the Code and the Regulations and to enable the Authority, its successors and its assigns to enforce compliance by Mortgagor with the covenants, terms and conditions therein and of this Agreement. The covenants herein set forth shall be deemed to run with the Property and the same shall bind the Mortgagor and its successors and assigns, notwithstanding that the Mortgage Loan may not continue in effect. 22. NOTICES Unless otherwise provided for herein, all notices and communications required or permitted hereunder shall be sent to the addresses on page 1 hereof, in writing, and shall be deemed to have been duly given (a) when sent, if sent by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested, postage prepaid), (b) when delivered, if delivered personally, (c) when transmitted, if sent by facsimile and a confirmation of transmission is produced by the sending machine, or (d) when sent, if sent by overnight mail or overnight courier, in each case with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to the Authority's General Counsel at the above address. Any notice of any kind sent hereunder to any,party shall simultaneously be sent to each and every other party hereto. Any notice required hereunder may be waived in writing by the party entitled to receive such notice. Failure or delay in delivering copies of any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, declaration or other communication within any corporation or firm to the persons designated to receive copies shall in no way adversely affect the effectiveness of such notice, demand, request, consent, approval, declaration or other communication. 1 17 23. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Connecticut and federal law, where applicable. 24. VALIDITY The invalidity of any clause, part or provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 25. AMENDMENTS w This Agreement cannot be altered, amended, modified or discharged orally and no executory agreement shall be effective to modify or discharge it in whole or in part, unless in writing and signed by the party against which enforcement is sought. 26. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute the same Agreement. False statements made herein are punishable under the penalty for false statement set out in C.G.S. Section 53a-157b. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered HUNTER'S RIDGE ASSOCIATES in the Presence of: LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: Hunter's Ridge Development Corp. General Partner By: Geoffrey W. Sager President CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY BY Gary E. King President - Executive Director STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: ROCKY HILL August , 2000 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, Geoffrey W. Sager, President of HUNTER'S RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP., General Partner of HUNTER'S RIDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Connecticut Limited Partnership, as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as President of HUNTER'S RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP., General Partner of HUNTER'S RIDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of and with the authority of said Limited Partnership, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court 18 STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: ROCKY HILL August , 2000 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared, GARY E. KING, President-Executive Director of the CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, duly authorized as aforesaid Signer and Sealer of the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said Authority, on behalf of said Authority, before me. Commissioner of the Superior Court Exhibit A Property Description Exhibit B Compliance Monitoring: Owner's Annual Certification Exhibit C Tenant Income Certifications t 19 NOV 06 '00 02:21PM METRO REALTY P.2:2 Memorandum To: Peter DeMallie .Matt Galligan Janet Pryor Marcia Banak Ted DeSantos Ted Lassman Peter Dunn From: Geoffrey Sager Date: November 6,2000 Re: Watson Farm South Windsor, CT One of the questions that came up in our meetings is our resident profile. Now that Whispering Pines (restricted to age 62+and identical to the South Windsor proposal) in Avon is full,we had one of our property managers put together a survey of our existing Whispering Pines residents. There are 67 people total in 52 units (1.26/unit. The average age is 75. There are 13 couples (25010), 5 single males(9%) and 36 single females(68%). We have the data worksheet that is available for inspection should you care to see it. If anyone has any questions on this,please let me know. Thank you. P;\PUBL1C5auih WindsoMoMmARefiidenc Hate.WhiepaingPin06404 MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Plannin From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: November 8, 2000 Re: WATSON FARMS 00-53P We have reviewed the drawings and drainage calculations dated November 3, 2000 for the proposed Watson Farms Site Plan of Development and have the following comments: Drainage Calculations 1. Pre development drainage area map is required. 2. Gutter flow analysis was not provided. Perimeter Survey — Sheet 2 1. The 7.89 acre parcel to the west of this site should be labeled as to ownership. 2. The A-2 certification should indicate which year standards are utilized. Plot Plan — Sheet 3 1. The drainage ROW in favor of the State of Conn should be described with bearings and distances. 2. The proposed relocated sanitary easement is too close to building 3. 3. Coordinates of the monuments should be shown. 4. Centerline information for the proposed roads should be shown. Grading and Utilities Plan — Sheet 4 1. All underground utilities are not shown. 2. The State Dept. of Transportation may require a bypass lane for eastbound traffic. 3. Have test pets or borings been taken? If so, please have the data forwarded. If not, these should be done in detention basin area and along the road. 4. Existing contours should be labeled along N/F Foster so that it will be easier to determine the proposed grading. 5. Inverts for sanitary laterals should be shown at the buildings and at the main. 6. Cleanouts are required for sanitary laterals greater than 100 feet. 7. The Community Center building does not have any sanitary lateral shown nor is the roof drainage addressed. 8. Depending on the existing soil condition, roof leaders should drain into the ground where possible. 9. We have a concern about 3 roof leaders being placed into a yard drain as we have no detail as to the size of the yard drain. 10. Roof leader outlet pipes are not identified as to size and type pipe. 11. Profiles of each road should be provided and centerline data shown. 12. The existing sanitary manhole opposite building 3 is not shown on the Sanitary Manhole Schedule. Also, the pipe from SMH1 to this existing manhole is not on the pipe schedule. 13. Yard drain 10 is shown connected to CB5, however with all of the other pipe connected to this structure, this is not feasible to build. Either the yard drain should connect to CB4A or a structure provided to connect the yard drain and roof leader from Building 1 and the outlet pipe connected to the northern face of CB5. 14. The two inlets into the detention basin do not have any energy dissipaters at the end. This should be provided. 15. The riprap pad shown at the detention basin outlet pipe is not identified nor is a detail provided. 16. The swale at the end of the detention outlet pipe is not identified nor is a detail provided. 17. The outlet from CB10 to the detention basin should be eliminated and instead should be connected to CB11. Detail Sheet — Sheet 6 1. Details are required for sanitary manhole, manhole cover (including locking cover), yard drain, handicap ramps, stone wall, energy dissipater, Swale, and clay stops (if required). 2. Detail of sidewalk is incomplete — the length of slabs between expansion joints is not identified. 3. Bituminous curb detail cannot be read. 4. Storm trench detail should show stone to spring line as polyethylene pipe is used. JCl/jsv 1540 Sullivan Avenue,South Windsor,CT 06074 PH 644-2511 ext 253 Fax 644-7280 1 South • • Planning Department Fax To: Peter DeMallie From: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Fax: Pages: 1 Phone: Date: 11/13/00 Re: Watson Farms Site Plan Review CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Review comments from the Planning Dept.for the above-referenced application. 1 Is this a subdivision or a free split of land? ,21' Isolux diagram for site lighting is missing. Lack of isolux diagram at ADRC meeting will result in having to return to ADRC. 13'�'Where do the lower-level units in buildings 2&3 dispose of their trash? Where is the required existing tree line(topographic map)?(In addition to be required,we need it to compare with the landscaping plan to see where trees are being saved) iA Any 100-year floodplain? If none, note on map(per requirements). Watson Circle does not appear to meet the intersection separation distance from Porter's Share. 7. Traffic study: L9Z Who prepared the study (not just Fuss & O'Neill; was it prepared by a traffic engineer??) Usually have a letter of transmittal inside the cover of the traffic report with a signature of a traffic engineer. Accident history: what is the actual accident history? A note indicating it's not on the state's SLOSSS list is insufficient. • Figures: Layout of Imperial Drive intersection with Deming Street does not represent the real- life situation.There is no neat 4-way intersection. November 13,2000 The report uses the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Other reports in the vicinity of the major mall/commercial developments have been using the Saturday peak and the weekday p.m. peak as the peak hours. How does the Saturday peak compare with the weekday a.m. peak? Please note that a special PZC meeting has been scheduled for Dec. 5 to accommodate this project, with action on Dec. 12 if possible (pending wetlands comm. action). Deadline for submitting revised plans will be Wed, Nov. 29 for the public hearing; and Wed., Dec. 6 for the work session. I expect that Dec. 12 will be the last PZC meeting in December. Therefore, it is critical that planning &engineering items be addressed expeditiously.Call me ASAP if we need a sit-down to address issues. 0 Page 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, eic e, el, Michael Gantick, Thomas Field, Bill Lanning, John Bond, Ray Favreau, Karl Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula, Jerry Iazzetta FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: Location: ' � T Site Plan 0 Subdivision No. Acres Zone 'R O Industrial O Commercial 0 Residential No. Lots/Units 7a Water: 0 Public 0 Private Well Sewerage: 0 Public 0 Septic system(s) Project Description: - —7a Future Town-owned property involved? 'Yes O No O new street(s) O new detention area 0 new open space/recreation area 0 active 0 passive Planning Department notes: r Please comment by +7 l o and return to the Planning Department. 11/21/00 1400 FAX. ROGIN,NASSAU16002/002 As long as the Premises are utilized for Housing for the Elderly under Section 4.1.11 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations,the following restrictions and covenants shall apply: A. The architecture, colors,heights,materials and floor plan comprising each building and the site plan shall be subject o the prior written approval of the South Windsor Housing Authority or its successor. Any change of the same shall require the prior written approval of said Authority. B. The maintenance of the buildings and landscaping shall be consistent with the level and quality of landscaping and maintenance provided by the Authority for its development adjacent to the subject property- C. Each dwelling unit on the Premises shall be occupied by: (i) Persons who are 62 years of age or older. (ii) A spouse of an occupant pursuant to(i)above. (M) An occupant pursuant to(ii)above who survives his or her spouse. (iv) An occupant pursuant to(ii)above whose spouse has entered into a long term health care facility. (v) Regarding subparagraph(iii)and(iv)above,in the event of the remarriage or cohabitation by the remaining spouse,all occupants must comply with the occupancy requirements set forth in this Section C. w:1PnWkl�.amoWouaa�o-sown arodsarhatriaimu ud ooaawa.aae ® L i V D FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting N nears?g� 0M 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040-5921 TEL 86o 646-2469 Fax 66o 643-6313 INTERNET:www.fussandoneill.com Other Offices: SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, West Springfield,Massachusetts Fairfield,Connecticut November 22, 2000 Providence,Rhode Island Marcia Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074-2786 RE: Traffic Impact Study Addendum Watson Farm Development Deming Street Dear Ms. Banach: Fuss & O'Neill prepared a traffic impact study (dated November 3, 2000) for the proposed Watson Farm development on Deming Street.This study was submitted to the Town of South Windsor prior to the westerly relocation of the proposed site driveway. Sight distance was measured at the relocated driveway. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour and the 85r'percentile speed is approximately 43 miles per hour along the site frontage. Sight distance looking to the southwest(left) is over 600 feet,while to the northwest(right) the sight distance is approximately 660 feet. According to the Connecticut Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual, the minimum recommended sight distance to the left and right is 430 feet for a design speed of 45 miles per hour. Therefore,the relocated driveway provides adequate sight distance at the proposed location.. If you have any questions regarding this addendum,please contact our office. Sincerely, Duane J. artin Transportation Engineer cc: Peter Demallie-Design Professionals Geoffrey Sager-Metro Realty Group G:\P97\97146\A60\djml 122.wpd Cones.(HQ) MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: December 1, 2000 Re: WATSON FARMS 00-53P We have reviewed the revised drawings dated November 22, 2000 for the proposed Watson Farms Site Plan of Development and have the following comments: Drainage Calculations 1. Pre-development drainage area map is required. 2. Gutter flow analysis was not provided. Key Map — Sheet 1 1. Note "142'± to intersection" should be revised to reflect correct distance. Perimeter Survey— Sheet 2 1. The A-2 certification should indicate which year standards are utilized. Plot Plan — Sheet 3 1. Width of entrance driveway cannot be read as it is over other information. 2. Widths of Thompson Circle pavement and both sides of Watson Circle should be shown. 3. The A-2 certification should indicate which year standards are utilized. Grading and Utilities Plan — Sheet 4 1. The State Dept. of Transportation may require a bypass lane for eastbound traffic. 2. Have test pits or borings been taken? If so, please have the data forwarded. If not, these should be done in detention basin area and along the road. 3. Depending on the existing soil condition, roof leaders should drain into the ground where possible. 4. Retaining wall in detention basin should be labeled. 5. Top of frame elevation for MH2 and MH4 — there is a conflict between the schedule and grading plan. 6. The existing well should be shown to be capped. 7. EXSHMI is shown to be relocated to SMH1. This should be removed and a new manhole structure placed at SMH1. 8. Profiles of each road should be provided and centerline data shown. � � 4 9. The inlet into the detention basin does not have any energy dissipater at the end. This should be provided. 10. The Riprap pad shown at the detention basin outlet pipe is not identified, nor is a detail provided. Sheets 5 to 7 1. These sheets are missing from the set submitted. Detail Sheet— Sheet 9 1. Details are required for manhole frame and cover, stone wall, and retaining wall 2. Detail of sidewalk is incomplete — the length of slabs between expansion joints is not identified. 3. Detention basin outlet structure top frame should be shown to be bolted down. Detail Sheet 10 1. Detail for handicap ramp should be labeled. JCI:awp c: Jeff Folger, Wetlands Officer ENGINEER\Misc.Correspondence\Watson Farms Review DEC 05 '00 03:28PM 860 645 0717 P.2 g tneers 146 F Wftd Road,Manchester,CT 01%1- 921 Fuss&UNeil1 Inc. Consulting E►cg TEL ow 646.2469 FAX eW 649.8318 INTERNET,www.tunaedorMI-00M Omer of m, Weat 3pr'ingft.NfsssachOM F&Ir iefd,Connecticut Provw"Ce,Rhode Island DeCember 5,2000 Ms.Marcia A.Banach Director of Planning D artment South Windsor Planning ep 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Response to Comments Watson Farms Site Plan Review South Windsor,Connecticut Dear Ms.Balch: This letter has been written in response to comments received from the own of South Watson Farms Windsor Planning Department dated November 13,2000 regarding the Senior Housing Development Traffic Impact Study. s Fuss follows: o10 Bei�Inc.has reviewed the comments and provided an item by item response 1, The Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Ted J. DeSantos, P.B, Senior Transportation project Engineer at our office. 2. A detailed accident history account for the Route 30 corridor between the Manchester Town Line and the Felt Road intersection was obtained from the Town of South Windsor Police Department for the last three years of available data.The information has been summarized in a table and attached at the end of this letter. Based on our review of the accident data from the Town as well as the Connecticut Department of Transportation,no identifiable accident patterns were observed on Route 30. The elimieddto�c u�see�Y �ei a��� in proposed development is not exp accident frequencies. 3. The layout of the Imperial Drive intersection with Route 30,as depicted on the traffic volume figures included in the report,is graphical only and not intended to represent the actual geometry constraints at the intersection. This does not have an affect on our analysis results. 0:TVM714M60Mgv12059-WIA comet DEC 05 '00 03:29PM 860 645 0717 P.3 J R FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers Ms.Marcia A.Banach December 5,2000 Page 2 4, As requested by your office traffic volumes and capacity analyses were calculated at the Route 30 and proposed site drive intersection for year 2002 Saturday midday peak hour conditions. Saturday existing traffic vo 1=0 On on Route 30 were obtained from an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) placed Route 30 in the vicinity of the Manchester Town Linc in September, 2000. These volumes were grown by a 20/oJper year growth rate to obtain the year 2002 Background traffic conditions. The expected Saturday midday peak hour trip generation of the proposed senior housing facility was calculated based on.37 tripstunit,which is a State Traffic Commission(STC) approved rate for a facility of this hype. Applying this rate to the 72 unit facility, 27 trips can be expected to be generated during the Saturday midday peak hour with 14 vehicles entering and 13 exiting. These volumes were added to the background volumes to obtain the year 2002 ons Saturday Build conditions volumes. The Saturday traffic volume figures have been included at the end of this letter. in order to determine the impact the site will have on the Saturday peak hour traffic conditions,capacity analyses were performed at the site drive intersection with Route 30 under the 2002 Build conditions scenario. The analyses results, which are attached at the arute s IWW,reve that the afte drive will not have Route 30 a significant impact on traffic conditions.ons. Route southeast and left turns into the site will operate efficiently at level of service(LOS)A.and the site drive approach at Route 30 will operate effectively at LOS C. We trust this information addresses your comments and concerns,however should you have any questions or require additional information, do not hesitate to contact this office at 860-646-2469. Sincerely, n Mark G.Vertucci ipll ed J. DeSantos,P.E. Transportation Engineer Senior Project Engineer c; Peter DeMallie;Design Professionals Geoff Sager;Metro Realty GiT97%714&A6OIa vl2O5LWPd conwt Fuss&O'Neill Inc. d rri n m ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR ACCIDENT DATA m FELT ROAD TO MANCHESTER TOWN LINE m WATSON FARMS SENIOR HOUSING W N l0 3 Vebicies Type of Accident ao m Involved m Year Total Inries Faolalioties 3 1 Rear End Traveling Backing Other Traffic Traffic Signal n Cordons Too Fast Up Signal (sister/Foster) m Aeddents (Felt Rd) 1998 17 3 0 2113 2 8 0 0 6 1 2 1999 26 3 1 6 13 6 12 3 2 7 0 2 2000* 22 3 0 3 14 5 8 0 2 10 0 2 'Accident Data through November 30 SOURCE:South Windsor Police Department -o f CrV971971461 6M=daRa_-Wd I DEC 05 '00 03:29PM 860 645 0717 P.5 PREPARED DATE I CHECKED I DATE PROJECT B �NO. BY, Lis r / _ Fuss&O'Neill Inc. omsal0l, $ngirfeefs MV 01, �'✓ (j SHEET NO. : .- Rrt uRa �- M �v��y ���'K f►�u� CC'�ccts i�r�G- �,� � 1 of 5 ..........jjjjj,�41 y ' s ,� •j, ,Y _r.. .,,..,�.•�.•.d... ai io IT- .. S .. a ^.�C/'+�•'.. ^;., f �r.�,-F• f�•��' p!Jyy1�� ��• .,,y,.. ;. r;.r `i�.-: ,•-�:, ...1i,. y .,- C FO-#110 DEC 05 '00 03:30PM 860 645 0717 P.6 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO, mBY.V !215/ BY ! 4 /� ba Fuss&UNeill Inc. consirlrirtg FilLgineers / 0` ! U SHEET NO. 4-4Kpx Lp � b r M . p 10A FO•N 110 o� jr- Oft 31 m W m . C. m CD t ti w . G ,,. � �''�.10 � RU DBMIi� � STREET 110001, 1 � TOMM . OF SOUTH WRqDSOR FIGURE / TOWN ; aik meaL w- am / OF +may uasas MANCHESTER SENIOR HOUSING / PERCENT TRIP DISTRIMMON / rOM ARRI'tIALS&DEPARTURES • / = nEPARMMS:(XX%) el1FPaZ Nar 97146AED ohiro 1&4MO SCALE KTA DEC 05 '00 03:31PM 860 645 0717 P,8 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE P CT NO. BY. �15 �/B'Y WQ FUSS&O'Neill Inc. ctlfrsrrltir Engineers n/►/ / f 0 6 /t / 'rr(J V SHEET NO ,etjaMa�J of • i l ,1 fr�� n]„-v ,T,. . , ,. ti .. , 1.— v� Ana v.a...,, � ; 1 , � kA tA cl P FO-#110 DEC 05 '00 03:31PM 060 645 0717 P,9 PREPARED DATE CHECKEDHROJECT NO. BY. BY �I�h �6 n ffil 00 Fuss&UNelll Inc. conslirnil,Dyg►neers � V SHEET NO. i ? 77 .,,. t•- f t'{ 14� •3 j !- j j ? ��,".� .. v' _, ,p., w ,.R •1�' � ••i' `S' '. „ • 71} ..�.77 : Sol FO-#110 DEC 05 '00 03:32PM 860 645 0717 P.10 HCB:Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.10 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC)ANALYSIS alyst:MGV grsection:Route 30 at Site Drive unt Date:2002 Combined Conditions no Period:Sat.Peak ersection Orientation:east-West Major St. chicle Volume Data: �vementS: 1 2 5 6 10 12 Mum� 7 27 4 456 8 8 7 FIR: HF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 HV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 -ed®strian Volume Dais: 'low: .ane width: Nalk speed: %Blockage: Median Type: None #of vehicles: 0 Ftared approach Movements: #of vehicles:Northbound 0 #of vehicles:Southbound 0 Lane usage for moveetlS 1,2&3 approach: Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R _ ----ice— -..� N y � Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ..__..-N N y N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lame 2 Lane 3 T R L T R L T R —r-----N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 2 Lane 3 L Lane 1 R L T _- R L T R ....-- •�.�..r _._....�.._._..��- N Nr. —N N N N Y N Y Channelized_ N DEC 05 '00 03:32PM 860 645 0717 P.11 tde: 0.00 to for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Westbound 0 ared In volume,ma}ar th vehicles: 427 0 I flow,rate,major thlor rt vehiclesVehicles: 1700 WOO [t flow rate,major rt vehicles. 1700 1 1700 ember of major street through lanes: ingth of study period,hrs: 0.25 'orksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. rMcal Gap Calculations: ovement 1 10 12 :,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 c.hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 by 0.02 0.02 0.02 egg 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,It 0.0 0.7 0.0 c,T: I stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 -ollow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 f.base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.6 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1.RT from Minor St. -9 _.- 12511 Conflicting Flow$ 553 Potential Capacity 1.00 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 563 Movement Capacity 0.99 Probability of Queue free St. --�- Step 2:LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 516 Potential Capacity 1050 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1050 098 Movement Capacity . Probability of Queue free St. Maj.L Shared In.Prob,Queue Free St. 0.89 Step 4:LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 999 Potential Capacity 270 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 1.00 Maj.L.Min T Impedance factor . Maj.L,Min T Adj.Imp Factor. 099 99 Cap.Adj.factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 268 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations DEC 05 '00 03:32PM 860 645 0717 P.12 Ired Lane Calculations 7 8 g 10 11 12 vsment f i1—• � v ement Capacity 26B 563 864 aced Lane Capacty Ash"t 10 delay,queue length,and LOS )vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 kph) 7 14 354 m(vph) 1050 0.04 c 0.01 5%queue length 15 8 A ontrol Delay 8.5 C pproach Delay 1 pproach LOS C Vorksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay tank 1 Delay Calculations 2 5 dovement I of 427 0 J{1 0 0 5 i1 121700 1700 5 1700 1700 P 5*2 Oj 0.99 1.00 D maj left 8.5 0.0 1 N number malor st lanes 0.1 0. Delay, rank 1 mvmts �.._._._...'..—..-._.r.--r._....__�,_..—...._...,.^---- DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors . gis December 5,2000 Ms.Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Connecticut Dear Marcia: Re: Watson Farm Deming Street South Windsor,Connecticut DPI Proj No. 99-1270 As per your request,net buildable acreage for the Watson Farm elderly housing development is 7.73 acres (8.7 acres less wetlands/watercourses(0.68 acre),less slopes greater than 15%(0.01 acre),less flood plain zones(0.0 acre),less utility easements(0.28 acre)=7.73 net buildable acres).Allowable density is 10 units per net buildable acre,which translates into 77.3 units. The project is proposing 72 units or 5 units lower than that allowed under the regulations. Thank you. Desi ofessionals Inc. By: eter R.111A4- he a ie Principal Cc: Geoff Sager Peter Dunn Edwin Lassman,Esq. Janet Prior 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860) 291-8755 • Fax: (860) 291-8757 Marcia Banach Watson Farm Housm Development a Page 1 From: Tom Field To: Marcia Banach Date: 12/5/00 10:56AM Subject: Watson Farm Housing Development Marcia, as we discussed last week I feel that the driveway is too close to the existing entrance of Porters Share. There should be a by-pass for traffic to go around vehicles turning into the development. Fuss and O'NEILL requested traffic crash information in the area, Manchester Town line to Felt Road,for the past three years: 1998- 17 crashes, 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely 1999-26 crashes, one fatal (involving a motorcycle), 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely 2000 -22 crashes, 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely If you need any more information please let me know. tom CC: Jerry lazzetta Marcia Banach Watson Farm Housin Development Nn✓ Pa e 1 From: Tom Field To: Marcia Banach Date: 12/5/00 10:56AM Subject: Watson Farm Housing Development Marcia, as we discussed last week I feel that the driveway is too close to the existing entrance of Porters Share. There should be a by-pass for traffic to go around vehicles turning into the development. Fuss and O'NEILL requested traffic crash information in the area, Manchester Town line to Felt Road,for the past three years: 1998- 17 crashes, 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely 1999-26 crashes, one fatal (involving a motorcycle), 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely 2000-22 crashes, 3 with injuries, 8 following too closely If you need any more information please let me know. tom CC: Jerry lazzetta f 1 Yee- 0U I CdrII�J-�- Ct.U�_((vt,��G.M- l�! c3.`t��' ��t'1f�:+'� t�t N�c;�•r'o� l[ Appl #00-53P, Watson Farm Senior Housing Public Hearing, 12-5-00 Planning Department Report l. e e Pr p coal Exception ZArt' le 4. 11 "Site a f D elo ent o "t stc o i ou i o e tre rvs il 'n : ei s ,'30 o t �edL—'� _ 1-acres:F,��-i-s 350-feet; uni urn__ € . Fr Is back i YQ5 ft, —beet 'nim iV re gyred. owed si is 1 31fa pildaNe-a"M,-TA(IlD that.- 7 units o b wed. 2. This application is a joint application between the Metro Realty Group and the South Windsor Housing Authority, as required in the recently-amended Section 4.1.11. The purpose of this regulation is to provide housing particularly suited to the needs of the elderly citizens. Housing must be located in reasonable proximity to such shopping and services as are required by elderly persons, and the development is to be designed to provide a pleasant environment for habitation. Also, the use must be in conformity with the general framework and intent of the Town Plan of Conservation and Development. 3. Special Exception criteria include: • Traffic impacts will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood; • There will be minimal adverse impacts on existing uses in the area; • Surrounding property values will be conserved and the character of the neighborhood will not be unduly disrupted; • Impacts will not be detrimental to the capacity of present and proposed utilities, streets, drainage systems, sidewalks and other infrastructure; • The land is physically suited to the proposed use and minimal adverse environmental impacts are created; and • Due consideration to preservation of historic factors has been demonstrated. 4. The Town Plan depicts this area as Residential, a category that includes medium-high density residential. The Plan notes, for example, that medium- —s (1 kq- 6 'Lt. � (edIrL� ��,2 cKf IA d Cr__ae ice cc �'a-=� c_ V erW4 y'���/ C l (( r k-�Ys -/ ro®o -eac ) S � Sv.te (�Untc:K rvI wi(( vIe trw 1 /�//-� 'irl/l��c�'►tiUyn, � U`?` CJvL 'r(_;(- � /�U I CUTAJ f fb �� Ca ,v S -,/, A; ; C LAO Gov f rP v 1rc f v orb high density residential developments might be limited to those areas having direct access to state routes or where they serve to buffer less dense residential developments from commercial development. In addition, the Housing Element includes goals that are relevant to this application, including: • Develop housing to meet the needs of the entire community, including but not limited to: small families, large families, the elderly, single adult households, various income levels...., and • Develop a full range of housing styles, types, sizes, densities, affordability, and forms of ownership in order to meet the housing needs of the community. The Plan also states that the Commission notes a general lack of understanding on the part of the public concerning exactly what affordable housing programs are or should be; and to that end the Commission should explore avenues of communication so that increased understanding of the concept occurs. 5. The development is subject to restrictive covenants to both the Housing Authority and the CT Housing Finance Authority. The covenants to the Housing Authority govern appearance and maintenance, and are required by the recently-adopted amendment to apply as long as the property is zoned residential. The covenants to the CHFA govern the property for 70 years. That covenant limits the income of persons living at the property to 60% of the Hartford Area annual income as determined annually by HUD. It also restricts rents based on an imputed rent schedule, where a person or family earning 60% of the Hartford median income would spend no more than 30% of income for rent and utilities. I have copies of both restrictive covenants for the file. 6. The traffic report indicates that the average daily traffic on Route 30 at the site is about 13,000 vehicles, h -e-Te,q stec 1 1�_ -- -ier�port'_s-_author_beid d,.-and that ffte-> /a grit data e incl de n t e repo �We-waald al o like.to.know how the,,, k hour�trafft /compares , ith,the weekday a.m. peak hoer traffic, as other f repot ,_ the�v"c' rad, d Ji`Buc rd Hills-de v e t e b e a Saturday-peak ho weekday p.rm peak bol[i as the largest traffic S. Y/W 1 me., � 7. Pedestrian access via bituminous sidewalks has been provided throughout the site. 8. im akin requ ed�is sp e p�er4 it or 18 ac s; te on reas th require ing to ne pe un' . The is t ° v' n s ���� S staff note that the parking spaces in close proximity to the entrance could cause vehicle conflicts and we recommend that these spaces be either relocated or removed. a-1eA- 9,11 Mchitectura an Design Review Committee reviewed this application on November 16 and was generally satisfied with the project design. ADRC noted that lighting will need to have full cutoff fixtures. The committee also suggested placing decorative grills over the wall condenser units; and noted that they would prefer concrete sidewalks rather than bituminous. 10.A buffer is required between the proposed development and the existing Porters Share SRD to the east. The applicants are proposing a 25' combined side yard and buffer, which the Commission may allow if site conditions support such (for example, the site is contiguous to open space, permanent buffers and/or mature vegetation), and large trees are saved or planted within the buffer. Paw We do Vttb&gree that the Porter's Share buffer is not very effective, and it appears that the buffed elied on aw+O ' -r subject site remaining wooded. In order to create an effective buffer between the two developments, additional plantings on both the subject site and within Porter's Share buffer area, as suggested by the applicant, will help to overcome the buffer deficit. 11.There are several large specimen trees on the north boundary of this site, directly in the area shown to be graded on the easternmost road loop. Staff recommend that a retaining wall be used along the roadway to minimize grading and thus minimize damage to those large existing trees. Also, we recommend that the applicant and staff work together during actual construction to make any necessary field changes to make sure the large trees are protected. 12. s' on re at�wetl'andg.-Thia-applicalion 'ss elidiAg�ZvithlWV �­ 13.Sgt. Field of South Windsor Police Services has requested that the entrance remain 200 feet away from the Porters Share driveway, and w = bypass on Route 30. f�u �c wa er and.se er areror�vided-:` ante, -oll it�Con� l Aaxfhgrity- `�P o al i re dire 15.Dumpsters are shown on concrete pad and are screened with arborvitaes. 16.If this application is approved, we suggest that above-noted items be incorporated as approval conditions, as the applicant has indicated their agreement with the staff recommendations. December 7, 2000 Certified #P462498138 Design Professionals Attn: Peter DeMallie 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Appl. #00-53P, Watson Farms Dear Mr. DeMallie: At the December 6, 2000 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved application #00-53P - Watson Farms - 700 Deming Street- Inland Wetland/Conservation Commission application for a site plan to construct a 72-unit elderly apartment complex, parking lot, drainage structures and associated improvements on a 8.7 acre parcel located northerly of Deming Street and easterly of Foster Street (Assessor's map #40, 29, parcel #11, 7) RR zone. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed prior to the issuance of the building permit and to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning & Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement. 2. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability, which might result from the proposed operation or use. 3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on December 6, 2005. It is the landowner(s)/applicant(s) responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. Watson Farms December 7, 2000 Page 2 4. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 5. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. 6. We recommend a bond in the amount of$20,000 be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. The bond will be released when the site is stable. 7. We recommend a bond in the amount of$25,000 be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for the establishment of the stormwater control structures (detention basin and vegetative swale). The bond to be held for two growing seasons to insure proper establishment of proposed vegetation. 8. Town Engineer and Environmental Planner to review the location of the discharge from the detention basin to determine the best option for the discharge point of the proposed swale. 9. A phasing and comprehensive erosion & sedimentation control plan to be submitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Retaining wall to be installed along the northerly property line in order to preserve existing vegetation. Final grading plan to be reviewed by Town Staff. 11. The feasibility of connecting roof leaders to drywells is to be examined. Test pit data to be submitted to Town Staff for review. 12. Maintenance plan for the catch basin, subject to review by Environmental Planner and the Town Engineer. 13. Recommendations of Section 7.3.3 of the environmental assessment document entitled Proposed Watson Farm by REMA Ecological Services dated November 27, 2000 must be adopted and shown on the plan. Watson Farms December 7, 2000 Page 3 14. A planting scheme be devised for the detention basin and the filter swale. Final plan to be reviewed by Jeff Folger Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION Elizabeth Warren, Chairperson EW:dr cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Watson Farm MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E., Town Engineer Date: December 11, 2000 Re: Watson Farm 00-53P We have reviewed the revised sheets 5, 6 and 7 dated 12/11/2000 for the proposed Watson Farm Site Plan. The profiles of both roadways do not meet the Town Standards as our standards utilize 35 miles per hour for the design criteria for local roads. We have been informed that the Watson Farm roads are designed utilizing a 20 mile per hour design criteria with the exception of four (4) of the vertical curves that do not meet the standards for this design criteria. If the Planning and Zoning Commission is to approve this application, the Commission must indicate that a design exception is grantedr,aand this exception stipulated as part of the approval conditions. In addition, the design engineer must re-evaluate the roads' cross- sections, especially around the,horizontal-curves, and a revised plan submitted for approval. JCI:awp S:\ENGINEER\P&Z APP.CORRES.\WATSON FARM COMMENTS Date i�l Jr. pg Post-it®Fax Note 7671 J a es To (Q /�� Fromm.(� .�ir Co. co./Dept. Phone# ' Phone# Fax# 2�t ?S'� Fax# Porter's Share Condominium Association, Inc. 59 SHARES LANE SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074 (860)644-1892 December 11, 2000 Mr. Walter Mealy Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT. 06074 RE: Watson Farm Application Dear Mr. Mealy: I am pleased to advise you that, subsequent to the public hearing, members of the Association met with representatives of the applicant and Mr. Peter DeMallie of Design Professionals Inc. As a result of that meeting, Porter's Share Condominium Association, Inc. has agreed that representatives of Watson Farm may enter onto the property of the association in order to install trees/bushes and shrubs in accordance with the landscape plan as prepared by Raymond Jefferson and the site plan of development as prepared by Design Professionals Inc. Our understanding is that the location of the trees/bushes and shrubs may be adjusted, with the prior agreement of the association, in the field, up to ten feet from the location as shown on the above referenced plans in order to improve the visual screening effect of the plantings. Our further understanding is that all of the work and planting to be conducted, will be done at the expense of the developers of the Watson Farm Elderly Apartment complex. Sincerely yours, Porter's Share Condominium Association Inc. By Joe B. Cummings, President cc: Peter DeMallie, Harold R. Cummings, Esquire 12/12/2000 11:08 8602918757 DPI PAGE 01 Design Professionais, Inc. Fix(a Ip :a••• T ,_::`;` . • � POW+del,' ��� ��•}4' �:.. ., ram':` .C+p Iiy r ' ©Memo Ike !(.ors 4�•�'. {` .. �� _ • ,r',f-�,',r .irk. ` .. '. '.• '.'� I • �^,•• � � . . . . . j :• '�.e.� �+ �•-��• ��.e J i ice..- /1,h ! "1 12/12/2000 11:08 8602918757 DPI PAGE 02 SI1', iv;! '•iy i�i'• ilk For:"'� ••:1• ::f` `\;_' a'<"�:'' ";> � �.\ •.-r,r ,,r� ((�„�jx�.�,, ." ,.�fi�'x: �,_ ,.t:..'. .', 1� .:,'r^..::. :�:';' a,4�r r' ''\,�� '1:i''J ""•i,`: J.:1•r' �,t", .'4.:'+�, ' f: ::;.:�''�;;:.•:.; } ,V Y.:. ��. a.•-�. ',i'Ar-4• vi. L:'�.(W� yi�Y:." K•5•.:� .�, •`�Y:, � �'�:O'h r4y y.. '�' ,;y the ;,�' `'�;,�::P ."'1(J• —.-,- :/, . :, �,;:_'ry'';.,1. ;.�'�, J: j :f`•:;, •'.tip .. �•: ::;vY,�•,.'!,;i ;:r:. '..V .•X' ;>J;,c,Sti+�'��'r.•''s ,;;k'.•'•'ri.:.•.r ;,t.1:. ;' .' _ :1gav��lr,,„;..,'•,�;�..'.. " it+'e.'•Y.:'� '":a�-,i`';;,••;'!!:•' Jr,: ,'.j:.in.�� j)//L� , 4w. : ;;tom ":•;.Sig. -+K s 4J^ , �. :r .`i• 12/7.2/2008 11:08 8602918757 DPI PAGE 03 x t �5 ;'ley; ;,;��:>;'C•ie � :�,•.' ��'r:r 1t:} �.•r; wti•:• `_::"� i�,:::i?e' Ili;•' +. ,t•1 .1 r., �♦ i •s. N. tt kL 7. k: t . rot[' "G'.,�•t'�rii`` � t ' �,iti.=:ilea,'+�fJr:��1'i•,';?1,i i� `I�: � "••ka,.j ;:x•;i'• irk . „•,.. ..",+'.;:' - r? ':::ram`:iv..:. 12/12/2090 11:08 8602918757 DPI PAGE 04 4.5�.'�•• •'�'-" `' '" 't:` :.'•:Ire'IA AOi pr. ! .ti . it�. 1 f•••':y`+";ye�,.i'.%' .;:. , ,r' r.. •`:,ice:.. '�1�' .,:5' - 1 12/12/2000 16:57 8602918757 DPI PAGE 02 ILL. . �'�•.' •� Nlifr p;,?d,. iS. �ti`.':,�..• ,irk-, .irk:'• 'gW;4r' , , ;Sy'��:'�1•.',^`s'. �:�' ';.5?a. a'•`+' }•%,•.'"' °. „ ..... i •... �,' 5.`[ '••°:il.; ,.t." �y. t.�`' �"•�', 'i:•err„ �,5•' ',.l`,` ••S}e:' '.��,.1.+� ,A,A'j ,A�• �•5:,phi.. r,}:.,:mot,}:', '3Y•:,.,.: . R7�,, (( .:�1`.;.:; •^'�,;• ,,fi�rr ;.tiY; :' "J �`f i�.:i`E'.Ili' ..l �•.t.,'C'' J tl [ -NY .'stir' i�(h-F;;N': .•:a:.•'. :,r \+. fe - ;;4s, . F o •R, r-: 4." !3. %y,.; f�•`,6 'd::. .3;.f fit••. L, ':i'i•� o-.ij �'.'iL... l r+ o- L�C,:f,: •t,+ tit ri•4�''. �+1,-,,:1}5�'rvl?;�:.:1•`"":� 1 •;:=Ya:: , .f f .;. dad, ..Y � in.ti� t .a� e::'..:;:5•Mr'.,. : ., ?`•:'::�'IA,.S;,,' "•yk.Via. :.r 7 4YA7 , TV 12) Y I'w' 'fit,"7.. ,,,' ::h •,: •t.,t. ,;, .?.:S•.: .. ,.:�i?" ..•:[:�.' .r. ... /.:•. .,.[_...' Fri-/`" J,: ,.<..�... i CIS'^'i::_�•,.,•ik^k,•' ,.r ''' 1, fir• :„ ..•...:::.:.:... t.S' ;:•p••::.�. ';,);. {{)) ter' - - "i::�i�i�'� _ n',�'.is^' ,:•11•� .r,4,• 1 .irl r r.� r }t •>; � i � ''•.n.:'d.,'� ''. '' _ +air • wY r ;,��„ •}..•i`�. ;.�:;s:r, -vr r� .:�.'Jrr,:`'cam'',•':� './' •'1 W �'Y• i• d K 7: '�':,•... •:,•;., ;i.:...��•w- ,:l�krn; :tits.`,,. .. fir%. ,�!S°'.: ..F::, •'•G (:;;y is J, 4 ,y , 60 3Ddd IdQ L9LBTGZ098 L919T 000Z/ZT/ZT b I, Walter I Mealy, Chairman of the South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission,hereby certify that on December 12, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted to Metro Realty Group, LTD a Special Exception to Article 4.1.11 of the Zoning Regulations and Resubdivision to for the construction of a 72 unit adult housing project on property located on the northerly side of Deming Street as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals,Inc.,Project No. 1270, dated 11/3/00 as revised. Assessor's Map and Parcel Number: Maps #29 &40 Parcels #7 & 11 More particularly bounded and described as follows: See attached two sheets OWNER OF RECORD: South Windsor Housing Authority/Edward G. Smith and Audrey E. Smith Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 27th day of December 2000. In accordance with CGS Section 8-3d Walter I MeabA(/ChairmaikJ Planning&Zoning Commission Received for record this day of , 19_, at South Windsor, Connecticut ATTEST: VOL. C�3.;`PAGE 29 ... QUIT-CLAIM DEED - STATUTORY FORM 3181 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation with its offices in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, does grant to SOUTH WINDSOR SOUSING AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic with its offices in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, with QUIT CLAIM COVENANTS, a certain piece or parcel of land, situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being known as 514 Oakland Road, being more particularly described as follows: 'NORTHERLY: by land now or formerly of Walter N. Foster; ' EASTERLY: by land now or formerly of Audrey and Edward Smith; SOUTHERLY: by land now or formerly of Warren R. and !: Oakland Road, in part by each; and WESTERLY: by land now or formerly of Warren R. Thompson and Foster Street, in part by each. i I _ Signed this 1�1 day of September, 1997. Witnessed by: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR i 1J, tthew Gall.A. Town Manager Gretchen E. Bi STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss: South Windsor September i7 1997 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared, MATTHEW GALLIGr'1N, Town Manager, as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such Town Manager and the free act and deed of said municipal corporation, before me. RFr.ETED FOR RECORD 5 .%z 19 9 a AT 1 1 • 55 u m Notary Public ;'Frr,Rrjrn My Commission Expires: 1��3t�dt301 t ca^ mac TM L Commissioner of Superior Court at 1L ,n n(, kt1;ti;runt r,I For(4-13Cz CONVEYANCE TAX RECEFVED r'\\ ••. • ��C'." \O STATES LOCAL 4 Nm )( s w( \ 1=s ` t , \�i TOM CLERK OF SOUTH�yyiNp$pp" 1 ) � t -r== f Volume 566 Page N° 569 A A M r ... w QUIT CLAIM DEED - STATUTORY FORM 0 O 4?2 9 Y'.tll.iL T At _ EDWARD G. SMITH and AUDREY E. SMITH, both of the Town of South Windsor. County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, for consideration paid, grant to EDWARD G. SMITH and AUDREY E. SMITH, both of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, with QUIT CLAIM COVENANTS, a certain piece or parcel of land situated on the northeast side of Route 30 in -4 1 the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut, and bounded _i and described as follows: NORTHEASTERLY by land now or formerly of Walter N. Foster. two hundred (200) ---- feet; SOUTHEASTERLY by land now or formerly of Horace C. Porter, seven hundred five (705) feet, more or less; SOUTHWESTERLY by Route 30. two hundred (200) feet; and NORTHWESTERLY by land now or formerly of Robert V. Watson, seven hundred five R (705) feet, more or less. 4 The southeast corner of the premises herein conveyed is situated four hundred twenty-five (425) feet, more less, northwesterly from the Manchester-South Windsor 3 Town Line, as measured along the said northeast line of said Route 30. > R Being the same premises conveyed to the grantors herein by warranty deed of George Smith dated July 3. 1959 and recorded in the South Windsor Land Records. The purpose of this deed is to sever the joint tenancy. Signed this '1 1� day of Szp,- 1989. a W encase at 'cia A. Farre Edward Smith / - • - udy AJ tlartocehio Audrey E. Sm th A STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) South ) as; Windsor r 1989 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared Edward C. Smith and Audrey E. Smith, signers and sealers of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be their fray act and deed, before me, :: NOTARY PUBLIC < ; • ,-: Grantee's Address: SOUTH (NUSOR i 700 Deming Street , South Windsor, CT 06074 CONVEYANCE TAXRECENEO RECEIVED FOR RECORD: OA ME�;0 M STATE �LOCAL S NO �Ma►a,�.. lad.�qw UT tNOSOH.CT i ae¢lcTANT TOWN CLE - - - TCWA!C1FA1�OF SourH Nnrtastw i ! i J 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co�'�w AREA CODE 860 /W-2511 December 27, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Jeff Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 10 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Dear Mr. Sager: Re: Appl#00-53P, Watson Farm Special Exception and Site Plan We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on December 12, 2000 to approve with modifications the above referenced application for a Site Plan of Development and Special Exception to Section 4.1.11 for is for the construction of a 72 unit adult housing project on property located on the northerly side of Deming Street, RR zone as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc., Job No. 1270, dated 11/3/00 as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permit will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$20,000 for erosion and sediment control, and a bond in the amount of$25,000 for the establishment of the stormwater control structures (detention basin and vegetative swale). 4. An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 8.1.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. Footing drains are required if the building has a basement. 6. A landscape bond in the amount of$10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars. 7. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. WPCA approval is required. 9. The building(s) street number must be included on the final plan. 10. Town Engineer's review comments dated December 1, 2000 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction. 11. Required restrictive covenants to the South Windsor Housing Authority must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Attorney. 12. Decorative grills are required over wall condenser units. 13. Proposed buffer along the east site boundary(abutting Porter's Share) must be enhanced with additional screening plantings. The Commission accepts the applicants' offer to install supplemental buffer plantings on property of Porters Share. A t f • 14. A retaining wall is required along the driveway in close proximity to the north property boundary in order to preserve existing large trees. The large trees to be preserved should be individually identified on the site plan and flagged in the field, with approval from Town staff prior to tree cutting. Field changes may be required during construction in order to ensure adequate protection of the large trees. 15. A bypass must be provided on Route 30 at the entrance to the development(subject to ConnDOT approval). 16. The sidewalk must connect more directly to the clubhouse. 17. Buffer planting must be in place prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the final building. In the event that the final building is completed during non-planting season, the last section of final building CO's will be withheld until planting is complete. 18. A waiver is granted to allow an exception to the standard specifications for the internal roadway profile. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets#2 and 3] with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. The attached Special Exception form must be completed and filed in the Town Clerk's office. The special exception will take effect upon filing. Very truly yours, 7t.1 e"d-tv L / Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlf cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. January 2, 2001 Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Watson Farm South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: Enclosed herewith please find the official request to the Secretary of OPM requesting that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998 -2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Watson Farm development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area",rather than"Conservation Area." I have enclosed herewith an email from John Radacsi at OPM saying that it would be helpful to have supporting documentation from the chief elected official and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. I would like to follow up with you to see how we should respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance in that regard. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP,LTD. A Geoffrey W. Sage Pr sident Enclosure: Copy of Section of OPM map and legend 10 Executive Drive • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAPUBLIC\South Windsor\Letters\Banach-Redesignation Request.doc Geoff Sager From: Radacsi, John [John.Radacsi@po.state.ct.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:35 AM To: Geoff Sager Subject: RE: South Windsor Elderly Housing Send three copies of the application to Marc Ryan, Secretary, OPM, 450 Capitol Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106-1308. The application should be accompanied by a map of the requested change area, the new map designation requested, and a narrative containing the reasons for the request, including any supporting documentation. It would be most helpful to have supporting documentation for the chief elected offical and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Sager [mailto:GSager@Metro-Realty.com] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:47 AM To: John.Radacsi@po.state.ct.us Subject: South Windsor Elderly Housing Our request for the re-designation of the land from conservation is complete. Dio I deliver copies to you; if so how many? could you let me know? Thanks. <<Geoff Sager.vcf>> 1 � s r ; ,',�� �S I�TII�/1fl fry R�;, e' � rL�=.I,. -r^_� ',•,_-_ . `��_ •� ` .ram, a � I� -� � _ I'. .. r _ �: '� -//fit 'I � • � _ ' .t COVE Y D D RD - -;, BOLTON 1 �V �► 1► - r r _ , NDOVJERNY N I TON I 1� - s •� n M r� � ' -,I � \ 1 1 f 1 GLAST U 1lor , COJBIA ' r RO 'f HEBRON� T� , a4',1 4 ♦\ i+ `� MXRLBOR O I ♦^ �`" • 0 ELL / I 1 ' / PQ:RTLAND ,� f / AM, N CO FIET MI LET Q N IfL Ilk !J' EAST HAD M-- *� HA13DA M 1 sDrRHAIL to A" AS va 9 00 �,! .', I — — — N LEGEND URBAN AREAS ® Regional Centers Primary Routes Neighborhood Conservation Areas '' Secondary Routes Growth Areas /V State Boundary /V Shoreline AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN i��� RPO Boundary ® Existing Preserved Open Space �^�� Town Boundary Preservation Areas ✓ Rail Line Conservation Areas Tribal Settlement Ar Level A/B Aquifer Protection Areas '�` Airport: Air Carrier Historic Areas Airport: General Avi 10 NAI LES 1p 15 KILOMETERS RURAL AREAS 3 . 2 mi l e s Rural Community Centers 0 Rural Land cz y 1 a. u p t1 .• .. :.a'^ ..J .; , G x Y, .: ! PY .. 1 P C. THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. January 2, 2001 Marc Ryan, Secretary Office of Policy&Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106-1308 Re: Watson Farm South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Ryan: We are the developers of a proposed elderly housing development intended to be financed through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority. The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998 -2003 Locational Guide Map has designated at least a portion of this area as a"Conservation Area", and we believe the property should more properly be designated as "Neighborhood Conservation Area or Growth Areas", which designations are consistent with virtually all of the surrounding land. The parcel in question is located on Route 30, in very close proximity to I-84 and the Buckland Hills Mall. The proposed land use of elderly housing was approved by the South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning commission and the Town Inland Wetlands Commission and enjoys the support of the Town Manager and other Town officials in South Windsor. I have enclosed herewith a letter describing our development plans and a report from our engineer supporting the re-designation we have requested together with-maps depicting same. Your consideration of our request in greatly appreciated,and we are prepared to answer any questions that may arise as a result of this request. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. r� DES Geoffrey W. er, residen cc: Matt Galligan .Marcia Banach 10 Executive Drive • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax P:\PUBLIOSouth Windsor\Letters\Ryan-Redesignation Request.doc �towN at,t .4 � o�s-outh ?/)&?41Y',60t y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•co� AREA CODE 860%644-2511 January 24,2001 Mr.John Radacsi CT Office of Policy and Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106-1308 Dear Mr. Radacsi: RE: WATSON FARM DEVELOPMENT, 700 DEMING STREET,SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Please be advised that the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and approved the above-referenced development for affordable senior housing in South Windsor. As you may be aware, in very close proximity to this site is the sprawling, densely-developed regional commercial area known as Buckland Hills in Manchester. This development dominates South Windsor's southern border. It has become increasingly apparent that, due to the size and intensity of Buckland Hills, rural pursuits such as agriculture are not feasible along roadway frontage in close proximity to Buckland Hills. This is partly due to the high land values in this area, and partly due to the land's undesirability for low-intensity uses such as farming in such close proximity to high-intensity land uses. The high volume of traffic on the roadways in this vicinity make it difficult if not impossible for farming vehicles to use the roadways. People are less and less inclined to move into the existing single-family homes along these busy commercialized corridors. The Planning and Zoning Commission has been attempting to buffer South Windsor from the major commercial development in Manchester, in part by approving "transitional" land uses in close proximity to Buckland Hills. The Watson Farm development is such a transitional use. By approving the transitional uses, South Windsor is attempting to halt the spread of the intense commercial development into our Town in this area, and thus to preserve such properties and land uses as the nearby Foster Farm from being subjected to the intense commercial development pressures. Please note also that the South Windsor Town Council recently entered into an agreement with the State Dept. of Agriculture to begin negotiations with the owners of Foster Farm to preserve the active dairy farm. The proposed development conforms with the Town Plan of Conservation and Development, which designates that area for Residential, a category that encompasses all densities and types of housing The Plan also notes that higher-density residential is —2— January 26,2001 appropriate along State routes and in areas where it buffers high-intensity uses (such as Buckland Hills) from low-intensity uses (such as single-family housing). The Town is taking active, practical steps to preserve farmland and stop the spread of commercial development into our Town in this area. The transitional use of this ,frontage land with senior housing will help the Town to achieve our goals. For all of the above reasons, we support Metro Realty's request to redesignate this property into a category that will allow the planned senior housing development to proceed. We also recommend that the new designation extend west to Foster Street, as there is existing and planned elderly housing occupying most of the land between the subject development and Foster Street. The Commission does not feel that a public hearing is needed for this redesignation request. Thank you for your attention to this item. Sincerely, SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Walter J Mealy,Chairman WJM/mb 01{'24/2001 09:09 860291$!5i DPI PAGE 02 ! ,.:Y ry I1 .. ( - r -� 5%, 4Y ,ME I. F ':4I. A yJ4a .e•: 1.rl 8% !.a I C` . .�.�" M 1. ,.,,�W,`,:`:":`-�'��",.,y::.,.., .� I. . - -I *,.�.......I I. .:I��-,:!.,.:," - ?.-�' .k t. 1 J4 IJ t) 2j Et, y,� pft�t l! - . Yn } c' '1 a ,l (' :..; ;;;: WoA, ',...,:•',.. • .. .,•„•,....,'.:r,.,,+.v.,...:fwr. :. ),�;,..�; ., ,•� ' 3 p., i,. ,,, . %) ,.. '.:. :; 7 r �Ita4i'a l"{!�..rli+t4l! t ! 9wGva X4�►t1 1 uim a m. ,y n,{Ibi17t$91L►1 i C}f11 rml Taa C? rM �' df 'imd��e that r dirl �` S t it t '11 a.1.."ZI-1.1. #31s h � wait�r►ttl i it a�f d :3,r . ,.,, ,' 1:F': a r `S .nr :. .,I, . ....r ^'r.,' ofI. .. y:•:; ,^r ,!`.' b'^. ..' to R y 6 �t °rf"""y yy . p Jait ' t1 }tr + S`, .- 7 t . r... � qr: Y: Ro- a �# " ' �b r -- )L r.- y ` X '; l xI. EA ' g .. I•.:..,:% c,:..,,,'., , ts:.:.. ..o.c..k ,1{., tr: % rr' a yt •;1C it �, S� t 5�ti, !j./'t y1 _ J1" i1"',,b I t :4 V- :.:. . ,;;I,; ..,. °:+ ' ,: ::. <::>•::. y;a a A wt , +.F } rN ' + } 'Ft.'(6 . 'y ,' 1 m %i' ,t:.. .,v:' .' k , ., .: ,I. ?,,'I i, :. ,. .. �.,` �.: :.:�: y+z:,: .. (. `I r,•: ,.,, is •:.,:t.,. 4 4.; 'A':''> . . ,. ;.�>:: . . �.. ':, g rg'n t"' ''.e` ..,..., . ...�., ,,., ;, ; .. ,..;i.k'' .. w:C',`rja ".-.-.!i'i'i'.'::`"•'a :..4J„ l,,I . .aP(y'r.''t(i :� . v '. r c',' s•,. G. � .. . .:.. .... .. ...: a:.. .. :, ...: .:.,, STATE OF CONNECTICUT o OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Z www.opm.state.ct.us TRANST(/��� January 31, 2001 Members of The Continuing Legislative Committee on State Planning and Development: The Honorable Eileen M. Daily The Honorable Jefferson B. Davis The Honorable George C. Jepsen The Honorable Robert A. Landino The Honorable Joan Hartley The Honorable Joseph Crisco,Jr. SCUTH Wa = PLA �Bl D • The Honorable Tony g Gu lielmo The Honorable Jessie G. Stratton The Honorable Marilyn Hess Dear Senators and Representatives: This office has received two applications for an interim change to the Conservation and Development Polices Plan 1998-2003. Middlebury is requesting a change from Rural to Neighborhood Conservation and Growth on the Locational Guide Map of the state plan. An affordable housing sponsor is requesting a parcel of land in South Windsor be changed from Conservation to Neighborhood Conservation or Growth on the Locational Guide Map of the state plan. These applications have been reviewed in accordance with Section 16a-24b-7 of the Regulation of State Agencies that governs interim changes to the state plan. Each request has been modified to better conform to the overall policies of the state plan. The respective municipalities support these modifications. It is my recommendation that the Continuing Legislative Committee on State Planning and Development accept the requested interim changes to the state plan as modified by this office. Attached are the findings and recommendations, which detail the review of these applications. We are available to meet at your convenience to discuss the findings and recommendations in the next 30-day period during which your Committee must,in accordance with the regulation for an interim change,reach a decision on this application. If such a meeting is desired,please use John Radacsi (418-6373) as the contact person who will coordinate for this office. Sincere , Marc Ryan Secretary 450 Capitol Avenue •• Hartford,Connecticut 06106-1308 i cc: Middlebury's Findings and Recommendations: The Honorable Joan Hartley,Waterbury,The Honorable Ronald San Angelo,Naugatuck, The Honorable Brian J. Flaherty,Watertown, The Honorable Edward St. John,Town of Middlebury,The Honorable Elaine M.R. Strobel,Town of Middlebury,The Honorable Harold S. Lynch,Jr.,Town of Middlebury,William J. Stowell,Town of Middlebury, Peter Dorpalen, Council of Governments of the Central Naugatuck Valley, Virginia Mason, Council of Governments of the Central Naugatuck Valley South Windsor's Findings and Recommendations: The Honorable Gary LeBeau, East Hartford,The Honorable Nancy E. Kerensky, South Windsor,Walter J. Mealy, Town of South Windsor,Marcia A. Banach,Town of South Windsor,Geoffrey W. Sager,President,The Metro Realty Group, LTD. Findings and Recommendations Interim Change to the Locational Guide Map Conservation and Development Policies Plan for Connecticut—1998-2003 South Windsor--Watson Farm/Deming Street Area On January 3, 2001, Geoffrey Sager, President of the MetroRealty Group,LTD, submitted an application to change an area described as Watson Farm from the Conservation category to either Neighborhood Conservation or Growth on the Locational Guide Map of the state plan (see attachment A). The Conservation designation was due to active farmland and/or prime farmland soils. Mr. Sager is seeking to develop affordable senior housing on the site with finance assistance and low-income housing tax credits from the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority. State financial assistance for the intensive development of Conservation areas is inconsistent with the policies of the plan unless the project meets the exception guidelines contained in the plan. Watson Farm is an 8.7-acre parcel of land. It is a part of a larger parcel of land that is designated as Conservation and is generally bounded by Foster Street on the west, Orchard Hill Drive on the north,Avery Street on the east and Deming Street on the south. Watson Farm is located at 700 Deming Street, (Route 30)in South Windsor(see attachment B). Deming Street is a busy thoroughfare that interchanges with I-84 less than a southeast of the site. Deming Street contains water and sewer lines with sufficient capacity to adequately service intensive land uses. Approximately 5.5 acres of Watson Farm is a part of an 18-acre tract of land along Deming Street that was donated to the South Windsor Housing Authority for the express purpose of promoting senior housing. To the west of Watson Farm is Flax Hill, a forty- unit apartment for the elderly that was developed on a part of the land donated to the local Authority. To the immediate east of Watson Farm is Porter's Share, a very recently completed condominium for the active elderly(see attachment Q. North of Watson Farm lies an active dairy operation,Foster Farm,that contains approximately 90 acres of pasture and cropland. An adjacent 17 acres is actively farmed apparently under lease agreement with Foster Farm. At the Town's request, the Department of Agriculture is working jointly with South Windsor to secure the preservation of the Foster Farm. According to the Director of Farmland Preservation at the Department of Agriculture,farmland preservation along Deming Street is no longer reasonable due to the availability of water and sewer services,the high cost of the land and degree of existing development. Further, development of lands along Deming Street for elderly housing was not viewed as inconsistent with the farmland operations of the Foster Farm because of a small, intervening wetland swale that provides some buffer protection. Due to the characteristics of the land along Deming Street that make it less desirable for agricultural preservation, staff from OPM solicited comments from the Town of South Windsor concerning the appropriateness of modifying the application to include these lands within the interim change. The South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission has provided a letter dated January 24, 2001,which supports a change of designation along Deming Street(see attachment D). This area is zoned for residential uses on approximately half-acre lots. The Planning and Zoning Commission views this area as a transition zone between the intensive commercial development pressures of Buckland Mall on Deming Street and the Foster Farm area. Based on the above information it is recommended an area along Deming Street be changed from Conservation to Neighborhood Conservation as defined on the South Windsor Interim Change Map (see attachment E). I so, or, 7j 14 y�lflit W-7 Ave Opp wo.0 Iowa jj- .10 ,'.'@a �'^ , 'i�';F I I�ui^'h,�l: b. p;;� ',°p°� �� �r, ,; 'x °� ) ( r • 07 [A JE LIJV, W> -1," AT ...e i OF RPM M Un IM 'i w". fg,,p oil ��e M.71 3 �,� � '� a z,� 3 � � r 3F�' e i wok§,,, E E�qg� � s,. � ,,, E F@• � � �� `�Sx�)�� Z3 �x� e ke � L k � S � $ E� �'^' w�ooee 4 D nAnxe > � Ann�A �� � 5 ���" � �� �� 3 � Y k Sa k `,� s 1 � p� k �� �k��n4 r r� ¢.� ^ � gy fi b a A 5„ �v��$ �z �;i'S R gg$$ � £ � 4 d 's A.Sg� D s � ',: e :� � �. � � �, '�9 g", S�� i Fp �' i L�Sf �''� ,.z EIS.; �, tl � �� i� 1 `3 a a �+ � Ap�,Je' { � �� �, <(& k� Vpy. S Ei i ¢ � � gkn � a,., L �` J� �;< ,� � � e �.. x� ��g =_ Y�� �a y� e�r "'"�R 4 ue.n $�< � � „ ' � ', �� , � � ee ��<;.� �S�" ire�, s,�.'` k¢ i , V ASS � ' k A� �' � _�� �i� aa: xV .g�: g�,, :�1 I;5 S F �`x3 �Y `n;�u tF k $, Attachment C 40-25 , N 40-30 40-34 i ---____.----- - 40-29 f 40-28 40-10 3-27 y 40-33 40-12 r 40-16 �T F REMAINING LAND OF ` 30 SOUTH WINDSOR 40-15 HOUSING AUTHORITY p0 SygR�1,S _ E SRO 0-17 40-14 40-13 DEMIA/G sll?ct ( ,� 2 _1 29. 2 .J �� ce 29—8 c9-3/ _29 29 29-2 29-10 29-6 29-19 ;29-1 ?t 29-9 29- -29-11 2 9— OEMiMG 29-28 q� 29-21 9-1 S�Efr(RT 3 -" 29-14 0) I a 29-22 R 29-27 29-23 29-.24 LAY MAP Attachment D TOWn ?40ZhdAqt S-0 s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soa Co�,�w AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 24,2001 Mr.John Radacsi CT Office of Policy and Management 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford,CT 06106-1308 Dear Mr. Radacsi: RE:WATSON FARM DEVELOPMENT,700 DEMING STREET,SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Please be advised that the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and approved the above-referenced development for affordable senior housing in South Windsor. As you may be aware, in very close proximity to this site is the sprawling, densely-developed regional commercial area known as Buckland Hills in Manchester. This . development dominates South Windsor's southern border. It has become increasingly apparent that, due to the size and intensity of Buckland Hills, rural pursuits such as agriculture are not feasible along roadway frontage in close proximity to Buckland Hills.This is partly due to the high land values in this area,and partly due to the land's undesirability for low-intensity uses such as farming in such close proximity to high-intensity land uses. The high volume of traffic on the roadways in this vicinity make it difficult if not impossible for farming vehicles to use the roadways. People are less and less inclined to move into the existing single-family homes along these busy commercialized corridors. The Planning and Zoning Commission has been attempting to buffer South Windsor from the major commercial development in Manchester, in part by approving"transitional" land uses in close proximity to Buckland Hills. The Watson Farm development is such a transitional use. By approving the transitional uses, South Windsor is attempting to halt the spread of the intense commercial development into our Town in this area, and thus to preserve such properties and land uses as the nearby Foster Farm from being subjected to the intense commercial development pressures. Please note also that the South Windsor Town Council recently entered into an agreement with the State Dept. of Agriculture to begin negotiations with the owners of Foster Farm to preserve the.active dairy farm. The proposed development conforms with the Town Plan of Conservation and Development, which designates that area for Residential, a category that encompasses all densities and types of housing. The Plan also notes that higher-density residential is �1'���ry��e•",,..,sl hmK'.r,, r� fdt�nl;t�l i h tr,3w til�v�\;s.t&r�1�'z tfY l>M1k>S',v t'r�.i'..� t! b$<�{ 1�`'t:�C;'�; T•'j`' ',.i '`IdE�r�l'P��vtl��lY.���v'i i'��y�r�el�b.k ,h: yn, .d�wGtxr�9.,�.�I'aa61a�,,,� ,1dls�;ll,.w Sk aE,;�I .,.is;wk a , �s,..t r:P,u,-.tl d(t(.,hl' 'a.A^. �r��+� ^,!}?'^k... '.r7';r�p I �,,,d. t ..).- )F�';`;r+,A , :}},,, • - . I• • �: •• - j� ��l ,R,lr�r r r 1,.i,;1r �lr(r✓ )a,til , r^ „19 I�`� t,}u1,y trt�d o i t {f �I a{ � ,t`u{ Pry�J ��{y,s,�E�,''.!}b^r ,.I7s �," �:` paf! �,)��ti'�IISNq�t�;�.' '• �"ke:un�{.�at�v„k.:�A„pdy! �, R,tl Y/C zt 4`�f t 't4z�2P Il 1 �t-dr Jt 4;,k�,,,•, n.: nrob't�,a...�4,�:I )4F^h i1'$ ..� �,,..,,,�>•,,� �s,�d1P 1 ��, t ..";N:d; . J(.Cv ui��, :�f:., li R a l`,`.:N. Y Y., ty Y � :Jw �'. �'�.,.awr, i. : ;,w"*.n o.� "'„4- '' !' A,pf- �py ,�,. ''�,..,� ♦• �p2 4:.1.� C,�.lo-.,r4l,. kltt:u ..r.Ft t.,�l�» t� y✓F�l -1k:: s4y!!.;^r �lh I1 .. :r ..�.,nft�.!... k. ff. �Ff `, r r .. �.'lwMllw"& r: S � ::k. w?�C^e'� � •S. .r 1 k,�qwa, sf dv >i �k. ,a`✓�.s,.,R I�.. I ,,p a. -H.w,r„o((, ,t.:t4.;�S uY{, d l :.all. :3 hY 7,i,W >�,�'+a ,,,x .�� � r; .,r )". °ta r f +.a r..,I l�4 A.� ,11w Yv �t f 4.[ 1. d}N V�l r 't /.L, t..yr, m ,c..A,.11r Lt :'�...r rpt al„1 ,!1.L.t d�N�.,,t7 .r .,k. .,jj'S. Y .'� l4 � ' 4"�+ • • - ��IJM`�) ddtf . Er : yr 3�Ir ?, 11 3l, 1 rA tl. .,f C �. Ilra rAb >l4 ) ,., jd* � .�glh,y.. � v. v� , Y (� . I •_ • �,; n m,„✓l Af.�I:i4'�,1 tl t�. vJ c•W{ f t rt: v..Y .iv,. �' ). 3U,^r ,Y I� tf. }5/.,r((:+,Ji. ar,u: o4s.Yiy; K\<�uY,.: �R>Lit 9 .,E �I., ,�iPF,• nr,.y.: : 1 v.r,,,V. �. 6. ,:f y,-., � ) ..y h,YPvv ,wkr f. u, r,..,.. I.. r •.R ., t,r,t�lr :,,,.,r N'C. ,tt. >.r ✓�/, ) '„"17r 1� :� � � yyyy'����.�tttte 4 (XI t..n- .n,w V�. � f1 4 1.,. ,,.� l I'. I ,? \ �, 1 S .,..r., ,r�.,I,�:rt rvc.l..tl� ":S rY V,.,�`.} f � h ,.�'., J� � '.�, � . � f. ✓.:. t 'n �6 � ., „�(.a A',r �3„ J Il u;rr:��.5 ,r1,�'1• �.I..�1,,.,. r {},I,,rk,.r. 'h, ..Arvl 7, . r1 W.Mi .,;u.,, .V,,. t� ,J hrN rt., 'i,,,:� , e I r �, h i '� d. ,£: , pA.,.�^V'+A ? 4,r..r r ..Fs v F� )..,.. nv nv � r ,1 r.,- � ..r e•fir,a. s<lat ,, ,(, (,:..� .,,,{°{�` C• teYV r � q.,t,1.. ;;1,.+. � 1� i� aL l u: Y� dal.,. rd, i�d,,.y,j ,�. n✓ y .v,�lYV �FS, � Ap,.�.>'��y>v,r; s,I. ?..:�k',�d tr l t, t J.,,+�, :✓�C ^} G .,re,,.p„ >r...:�'�',, ....Z.e... ..., 1..( r ( t..v, ,.I �11, tCa. wJ...,,, a. a ,�L.. 5 ,or�lA„){:.,�yb� .atl•. t�$I � t ..���'.:+' uPm ',t,`�1 ' §�. r, „c4. .,,.Srif ,., ,n s.. �F r,:,, ..�. (i..,a,r. k. h,.r,f�,a,,.�. ,, 3 ,,. �+,n,ISdm 'f.r r. � s,., ,,L a ,,t a1 r 1;•p;, , ,. r,7� 7 A�I �,p.�.��. „1�..,c� w nft (�. ,.,✓„1„ „�f.lv,M.}N ,....,� 'S .f.yT. :,r,.':',,,. r ,. .a,y,�.:.C '�,..t,y1 ,,. v:.,{. r ,,�.,... .l.N.=Y.p �5+ r� �u``,S,H., r' .:.. ., y,,�r,�+4" a -v 3nP,..1�' l ,,. - 'lw u.lr(,^�:. �,d,,.!(. t )1s.1,.,>M."„ 'n. I�k .,d1 ;1 /.l4...niC,,: �'' � u.r�L+.v ,��,u„,,��v .j� , qn.�t � �i�J,. a t' �+, ,�t{'r :at. . • I.;k oF!r, 19r1i1•S,":�b rt f 4...n7lk.'r; t}tSC..e, `n 1'��a ,$:, vtik��,(S C.ru tirrl ,,� Cti;Yh.,y� � 5. .� ,'•.tt' 1l.�FlI+^ ,:», ,�,^ll k sv b.,, � �4�.,.v 4 • '.:. r C�ngm�} �e AFa� U $' �,,:,I wt�`e,yy6. MFt ��'Yyai P ,itc. 1 ,t�,�, ,', tl,.�' rS�n � 1„, rM} � ,., ✓ ,C'.J:,��.,.A �y r'lk,.)'. .j,,.J� c 7 �., !f .ti,2 ,. p ,.�I �r at A✓, 0.!1',o-lv. 4'w.4:f,:;l +,AI n�t(1. ,!a Lkj"o i.S� � ;'W4. m ': �: �-„o ")y. : ? �+: o" �r'i t',it��, �; �1 .°t,�^ 't�I'. ,k, t�..,1..1.td�1 Pfi. i �� tr,fud rlr a...r ,r.n�,15^j'. le�'J,r;;n n �' 1 .p'rr l}a�. J,4. f R..r'.r.'(.,�,�,1 �:o�F, ..1(}. d„ r:� ! v t 4.A ,I�� •-a: '.:.. I �y�','s ¢r,4Al� �4 t 1y a,{{.•/".,• ,��, ,aNal d ?tr ItiP ,tlJ � ta,iprr}4 h� � 4.{,�:,) :. � ��'� �,;. 1��%��t �rtl,,1.!,,4, nd+. ,fdJ-,•u��d�+fha+Yl94:11r .R;u(.,n.. y s*r,lt: V�'ai I� �1f\v f:;,r'n'aa *."'�4d.'{".,r1 ty� t'sF,..L yp awl„ �''T% r; :C, 'tl�ll�,�:.{;i. a,i n���.. ?.. �'�' arld�;a, - !� ff'h,,,;9V.( �' �, „�he 116 irk i.-;. p l al m;..Ill ra ¢,1,na,.,a x��:�:r 9!`4,� � �aJ,d,p ny 7�,'. '4t1. �,i^d ul:w.lSr.,a,. , ',d �,qr"r � +r��,�l' •c• ..r��'le"o. ,+,R4 �y�.gri'lr r ,y.,,, t,:�p v ,. 5 l �, ,.z 1rt ,��, ,:�.ItL�G ,, ,v,:,k�� L,.,..,I,:; r 1,.�� _oa,:t,:,, t hr •o��.>c�.t'�„tr 1^ r �st �� 6� wa ,�J.,t ,�rs „„e tt I'7�rq .,v �,vt�,,,, + n. „i✓. It�t��,l->,),1 `51f ,i�,f a,i.� ,�.Jr r �,m: x,a:y..�vr t- {-:. rt y.:,ll✓ S tiLatt;Y�4 V,.,3. �:y; :x:?�'.A,�:hr ^�:,h•?4i,�Yp,,p,l tvr,plC.,.,e:� Z )Ih� b t ,.•,,� ��,.ll.,,tt,y b.�t -'< v �..,rr,.,"l. y M,�rt�Pm .r�t ;.k f �Sr rd SM,..#v!'f ,;�, .f�.+vj'1:2V 1.',(.� :,,,�.f4�o�, J�.,�� : r;,1 •':Yi,' ^��, ,rr T)e(A. I.N f, p"Y,, ,' �'4 ,!o) „f�,,,, ,,w,. e P4rr .r'�b�S,IC� tu,iD aR+a.,, e.. 1 '.c:.rl �:": Gzt.e„, �Is'.�;SyS��n� .. >�:tf ,_i�� , :Mn ,: xa,�;�:'4'': g .✓, �.tl, Q �',( �,y.a;}), rs,. � ffl � 1Iat7, �l iL:..tla aL , r �tv,,,,n, '.,,t !1�„�r ,1'-r,. tru U�Sni> n;"wu�y,"ffr1� .�av, ., f, r I . +,�✓, l : '.�'i?,�'t, a,Janrl d,,tid;5�,�r rfF< w;,. ,+� t 1�}�, r.l''P is n'1: 'rl�i��, 1�yur tt�m ,(� h'`ni �� c ��w„ ,) �,� ,s"�, �rJ,dt d• ,d`� n ,a R y - d}���Y��i�,F _;gow i l � ��s a:�ttQ Jkk is�✓�pral���4r$�iv}d}�j�a�'���d�`,Ct�,���sx �+err 4�'�st },w.S U,a. � �, �\��t` w ), � j ( ��� ,D3 • ."�,'w ,7: Y�. D...l(+v)t r ur,4✓'. :�s., � 'a H, � ) �r � IY', ,�+5 "+ I r �� 'F9 a` �\l`�t�r w r.' � rPrl ���, �; ��fi �- ���1 �IVI��)�`�t "+����`'�C''� 1� •. :,r , 6 1`(4 9 h� {a! t o i✓�,t 1 1Pr� ,� �� � "!(� ? �'� 'p nlpr, a+ �i 1��r�� _ ro�,�� n:��'{t ylY�t )�1w,, �uW.+ay�„ �"�9 t� �i y4,FF'4'r�Ji�6JNft 1 l"n"t�In��d¢i� p"y1'rRi✓T Miir � x R fv�A� �h{ t � -. �I'ia�e�l�irtlelr�l�nam yrN1rC d:C '( i����r�lrn,�"1�1b wV�w„ik �"�q�µ��S�%�f�'4 ���1 A'k��`�vl^lJj4��*, J�h4r'v id �a�� . .• •�.• . l ;;�� , +ek1t)r � a n � hi�„uaaewl �} t'Ettr t('✓ ✓srs�u � �S,j ', d i s c ' h i Kt�, ✓ ry t ,r d e� 'gdrg, �� ���' 'I :`ry'� �""' (eN°���"�kjrfs'tJl�h�"���I�'h�vr��iPa'��r1,r°w"�'t�^Cll"q)'t6i���i(��t'1a�, ,'x`e'�`1+"j:.• �,�sh�;:n��)""pq,i�i'�(I4 Y�r,'r Ary,l'{kCr�'l ���F iMw �T ,�W n9,P`Yr I� (qyy^}A✓d>� r r�r-' � _ a, n��r+�i i 1 Pr{ k�nC�l�,lok�n,�a�i`3i I��ra 4°�Y\ ("`rS�(Y�k s`a s�wya 4� tr • �:I _�® µ,r�yyM��l ��y ll V�'�t'patn tup✓1Y ru) � pw^i o d�uf 1�}>op �nl P"' �t'w�J�yfg�� �Lrx{,C���7S}'Nr 4 {'i Vs 7✓6 tt��wx�,f(;lr rdFrl(w t�V�i�(ti;��w�(�ky���tnJ)wrt�hd r t4rn�7 hnl t pll l v�' d�4r r ' r���,,,�d��C eta fi"7 t��itiY� a r�aJC rrl y^JA �ir� tatrs .itt}ttr�yll� "'YA\111�ar�� l{n';t�dtl:r;lr� ttr�F f.ptiir.�sys� rri rYn �rh��i�rwl4 ypC {Ypk1i'P Jr•,'rLktia'�7W '� ,i},ra rt �-"''+_ 1 I + l,1 7 r i Lea vv}!Ir ' � rY A� {,C tr lr, ""d, y� .•� , lo�A cr3�.�� >S,C6..x e'l�fr,.I•xrl?. r 2R4�'hi�t 4't. NI '��,d"Ir41"4i {��k,l�t vre wrl�;�nly�f,Y 1"1�1, z�r�� ,nf�i�,�li n'� 0.:u?',r i4AShn y��snf•..,t'q y .J. �n<r-T !+t I S!'bjaSl lay,p�V(�f%ry�f"3i��� �.��F�rtv�Av,Jll�r t:,d{{I�rkJya�k4,�;'�V4�(' �s�rL•��1jt'�r"� 4�': �f�i,:�''-�' n�:1(^dra�l if C.����Y tte ,"<'.. y:;lld k": 10, ?.�) 4 t d !}rtR I�Iruti;�ff r✓N' TIC P Fa' a�' C3r ,'ray ( 'i...r�, ..;,iA Cy j e t la jrxy.#'iX �'r;t ,A;ttt Un15tl ..y li r..„��l(� �(.;����� .� }t'y Za;n ^ ✓,�ty�,',j�?wvk �,iiu'. ^f rr r �il�'�„„� !�i iPt "Ik�lrra„Jp.,, t >(i;.„rr e , ',::�7 a, °,+' ts,.r.>`rb,.� r,. � , „r,t�u Ih.n i.. ,-u{:c 1"k ..}llt_r nt� .�•-.,t t( 7 ! +t ✓ .r. J t � r y d .a a� E,, ��, W1:,.,�5�'a, a3 t.a ,za.77 a' r1':,lr, H ant.'(t+�t ;h:tdd�+xu�,! ..t�..•G r, a�:. 'rbo..alel,,.� 1�,�. a,�I,,�l, nl ..G l yr r., tY v �d' 4C 1 . t ,s::'t , z I;t { ,,^r7., t Is:.du, ,�7�.r...l Fr .a 'a1, ..��. �{�Li p%'9�.,✓Srr �,�� 5� •. t r'1),• �„ll}i tr l)..�Ihq {1/1 Y, �l.�y-rl ?� .4, m t "'s"F.�I7 >a t r d,?n ti r J hy1 .:.G, �(r., x,r r r�.�S:r� }'C )$�1. �J'ti8 rdA��#'�'� t �asr��'^v�,{�'}pJy,r I1Ck�k � • � l' lwt,G '1 ::,M1 ""J, �, ':.: A•,a ,.: }:�5,I, ,.,W:.,1���Y, }f �"r"';' ),r\\ -&'I�ffs,},n It:: pi,,C 11 �f y. i ,u .t„i k, ;,l v'✓r t liV',,i, I,,, v � r)-� F,1 „K luvYF?�tl�r r1;., kl'v. v'.rV. }n. :e1'){�f /� tt . ,.n, ,` tu .��d+e.,..:.. .:A, r..r1a... x 1, /'lL,:,:..0.(i ,( r iy? kfl, M,., ,1, F. .. at�i. .,�. .��t7t,ru a. :: C�'�"o r .t.• �.�� ),,:..„v 'rr l ,,.ff.,:,. VIA i ..a 1,r,,57; .... r F ..7 k... 1, Lh khl :D ,�.... , ,„t.p. C ,,, if .r v, .�.��r .�. ��, I hCr.,a ,r;., W•fC � b,'. ..,_N r q �, \,,u:,' :Z�..rror.:.;G, k V,,,.,! ..,I 66 ,�:.riL,t,r, ,„> i .(fL,•,. h �,1, e� . � t,a i„:, I c..,,,(a :, ,k)a4� t�I� .��S, ,1r,la ,J,I� ;wI b ,,a, ,;�A�u��1'Ji�...i. }�vl .r�.. .u.%',Y;, 4.t ,.... .,.: .(.L` .. 1. �. .il t <Y,. ,...;,. Nr .8�i,1t .,,.:. 1'v:...,.,.,.,�, . �1, ,., ,..5, .xr ?l.R� It.,✓ I. �lt�.^��a,' r .t.� r ,, „.h f.�r,S,' "7'2 "+ , �,r,. �iI��C F.•,. .dr ,l -:: v r ', •, i �-7 n. �.'��t., ,. �, ,ue✓, '. � .,,�'� w ,.�,. a, Ina., .,:�� {3,, .�. ,9 f i,>✓ �v�,t, r.a. 'rl.., , '( ,�, 1�..t.. l� y n : ). .tl�. P��a.A �Sy "4, � !{t.a, 01„'1'A F �It1 r I , b i•' 'sf 1J...r � (hlw:.,,a ,1, �tr, {11 � ,;0 J ,.tlt` 11 r z �1 >7�+.�r�,,.P.r .F�r � r fr.rpa` A ,;N`�a r �: J ,1, i, k.,�+'... 1^: .,I. � �.W'!ih �-d dlv ,.�,.,.r� ,...,�• .t"' r ��I p rr ,, �z' :.I 1 v ,ySt .,,v., myq�)- f. ✓,:' $ ,'„, f.. 1.r, �5:,p' '�", :."., u Y.�t,...l,:;' �,C t. ro.� ✓A @ ,�,<. , � ,rW, b�. I�.Y,r✓!l ,�',. ,'k.� a,llt ,!M 1 xl,?. r �i I. .�u u, 1.1., "1 1 >rc � ,o ,I:: S'' vY� ,:r$, �'� .:/ �i i:',r q. �,rk'ry,Y `y,> r , � �do.p1 �,.4i s t:6 (,<r r,.., Y. ":4 t'... d I(.sa �rh�.i.,,,y t, .,.,x..3YN :t:�'C'ry'. 1:,1 ')}'��1�,,. M.vw�'kvr, �:M. ,w �' t✓. . t k`al�.r�.�rClt ��, "�� nsV.,. e, .Y Y P.W' .r PR r, r 9'!b ,yC,r..k:tpt„c�. ,r, +.,tir ^h .y 1. N lap r ,.� ��'•� t +,n..�" ��' r, 5� nbo�. ,rY,v�,�„ �'� �t '�- �a'v°� �� • r- • • • •: : / DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers •planners • surveyors • gis RECEIVED October 1,2001 OCT 12001 Town of South Windsor SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNNG DEPT. Planning Department 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 Attn:Ms.Marcia Banach Town Planner Re: Watson Farm Dear Marcia We are submitting herein,three sets of revised plans for the above referenced site. The plans have been revised in response to comments made by our clients. The revisions to the plans include the following: 1. Detention basin adjusted to eliminate the retaining wall adjacent to the basin and maintain the capacity of the basin. 2. Adjusted the grading along the north side of the site in order to minimize the size of the retaining wall along the north side and protect the selected trees that were to be preserved along the north side of the site. As per the landscaping plan,a significant amount of additional landscaping is to be installed along this side. 3. The grades along the outlet swale were adjusted in order to eliminate the small retaining wall in this location. 4. A note was added proposing a substitution for the Baysaver unit of approved equal. If there is a less expensive alternative that would be acceptable to the town,then we would like to be able to substitute the alternative. 5. The double catch basins were replaced with conventional catch basins. 6. The storm drainage alignment was altered slightly. 7. The dumpster and handicap parking locations were altered slightly. 8. We are proposing to not install the curbing along the western side of the roadway adjacent to the wetlands. This saves on grading in this area,and would provide a more rural look to this area. 9. We raised the site an additional F in order to help balance the cuts and fills on the site better. 10. The road pavement and sidewalk details were revised. 11. A note was added to the plans regarding the sidewalks. Please review the revised plans. We look forward to completing this project so that we may schedule a pre- construction meeting. Sincerely, Galen Semprebon,P.E. Director of Engineering CC:Jeff Folger Michael Gantick Enclosures: BOND TRANSMITTAL DATE: APPLICANT NAME 1,(lp(�3Cf� ��iv� 4,r&,e4 ADDRESS CO E X�-c.t.'�+•t/`� �� PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS � ��,�, f l)CZ/ •x.� �OT P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLIC_ATION NUMBER 6b S31 4 f41myoda �a&j.Scopt,.I AMOUNT OF BOND CHECK NUMBER-,-t DOS DEPARTMENT loldAM n SUBMITTED BY d'U � A NAME DATE RECEIVED BY FINANCE. ION /d/ NAME DATE SOS o l6 �tCunolsc�P��G /O,(l0a SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER Sooa Sao o fn-h6anm �oZS Dda HAPlanning Department\PZC Secretary\fomis\BOND TRANSMITTAL 08-27-0l.doc owe se, `� HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH WINDSOR 50 ELM STREET . SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 f�oSOR•Co� (203)644-3082 RECEIVED October 26, 2001 OCT 2 6 2001 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mrs. Banach- The Commissions and Executive Director of the Housing Authority support Metro Realty's request to use bituminous paving for sidewalks instead of concrete for the following reasons: 1. The Metro development plans have very extensive sidewalks. These sidewalks facilitate travel to and from individual Tenant entrances and throughout the development. It is easy for the Housing Authority to understand how such an extensive sidewalk system is cost prohibitive in concrete. 2. If the base beneath the bituminous sidewalks is substantial, heaving due to winter frost should not be materially different than concrete. 3. The bituminous surface is easier to clear show and ice since the black surface attracts the sun's rays in the winter. 4. Bituminous concrete is easier to repair and keep up with. Concrete sidewalk replacements are prohibitive expensive on an ongoing basis. 5. We know for a fact that the developer's budget is limited and cuts to other portions of the budget such as air-conditioning or fire suppression are far less desirable than bituminous concrete. Pg. 2 6. This same developer utilized bituminous concrete in Avon on an identical building prototype and we are quite pleased with the aesthetics of that development. For all of the above reasons, we would respectfully request that you reconsider the imposition of concrete sidewalks on this development. Thank you for taking the time to review this request. Very truly your, Janet Prior Executive Director i MEMORANDUM -� To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Cc: Michael J. Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works From: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer YO Date: 10/26/01 RE: Watson Farm, Plans dated October 1, 2001 1 have reviewed the revised plans for the above mentioned project in response to the conditions of PZC approval dated December 27, 2000, and have the following comments. I. PZC item 5 - The plans show one footing drain from each group of 3 buildings. what are the construction details for these footing drains? II. PZC item 12 - Engineering Comments of 12/1/00 Drainage Calculations 1. A Pre-development drainage area map is required. 2. A Gutter flow analysis is required. Sheet 4, Grading and Utilities Plan 1. Please provide a copy of the plans for widening Deming Street as required by DOT. 2. Label the existing well to be abandoned and capped. 3. What is the elevation of the first contour line shown in from Deming Street? This needs to be checked and labeled. 4. Show the outlet elevation and plunge pool for the existing drainage outlet to the west of the proposed road along Deming Street. 5. Extend to curb line on the west side of the road past the first dumpster pad and pick up the curb again after the proposed baysaver unit (at the bottom of the hill). 6. Label the dumpster pads and indicate how they are to be screened. P a 7. Label the elevation at the end of the drainage swale on the west side of the project. This swale should have at least 1% pitch out to drain. 8. The elevations of the inlet and outlet for the detention basin need to be clearly shown. 9. Handicap spaces can only be located where there is no more than a 2% slope in any direction. 10. The parking spaces on the side of the hill on the north west corner of the road will be difficult to use and keep free of snow and ice in the winter because they are on a 6% cross slope. These spaces should be removed. I also suggest removing the sets of parking spaces to the right and left of the entrance road to make the entrance to this development more appealing. 11.This plan needs more spot grades to show all the high and low spots between contour lines (there are a lot). The elevations for the top of frame and inverts of each catch basin also need to be shown. 12. Number the buildings and/or units on the plan view sheets. Sheets 5-7, Plan and Profile These sheets need to be checked and revised to accurately show the top of all the structures and the center line road profile relative to these structures. These sheets also need to agree with the grading shown on sheet 4. Sheet 8 Include the most recentlapproved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Sheet 9, Details 1. Details are required for the proposed stonewall and boulder wall. 2. The Pavement Cross Section should show 12 inches of base according to the Town Standards. 3. Show 8 inches of gravel base on the Sidewalk Section. 4. The Dumpster Pad should be constructed of 8-inches of reinforced concrete similar to a sidewalk at a driveway. 5. The Typical Trench Section should show the 1-foot cut back on the pavement side. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank You. y., a DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. civil engineers .planners . surveyors • gis October 31,2001 Town of South Windsor 1540 Syllivan Ave. OCT 3 South Windsor,Ct 06074 2��� Attn:Mr.Jeff Doolittle,P.E. SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEpT Town Engineer Re: Watson Farm Dear Jeff We have included 1 copy of the revised plans for your review. The plans have been revised in response to your comments dated 10/26/01. We would appreciate if a pre-construction meeting can be set up as soon as possible,as our client is anxious to begin construction. Our responses to your like numbered comments are as follows: The construction details for the footing drains will need to be illustrated on the foundation plans when they are submitted for a building permit. Drainage Calculations 1. The limits of the pre-development drainage area is coincideit with the outer limits of the developed drainage area on the site. 2. A gutter flow analysis for the site is enclosed. Sheet 4: 1. The widening plans will be forwarded directly to you from the design engineer(Fuss&O'Neil). 2. There is a note on the plans regarding abandonment of the existing well. 3. The contour line has been labeled on the plans. 4. Plans revised accordingly. 5. Plans revised accordingly. 6. Plans revised accordingly. 7. Plans revised accordingly. The swale has been designed at a 0.5%grade for water quality reasons. The swale was designed to retain water and drain slowly. 8. Plans revised accordingly. 9. Plans revised accordingly. 10. The three spaces on the hill were removed. The clients wish to keep the spaces along the front of the site as designed and approved by the town P&Z commission. 11. The high and low spots were labeled on the grading plan along the roadway. The drainage tables on the plans show the invert and TF information for the drainage structures. 12. Plans revised accordingly. Sheets 5-7-Plans revised accordingly. Sheet 8—Most recently approved plan included. Sheet 9 a structural engineer and will be forthcoming. er walls are being prepared b gl 1. Details of the boulder g p P Y h Y 2. plans revised accordingly. 3. Plans revised accordingly. 4. Plans revised accordingly. 5. Plans revised accordingly. or if you need additional information. We f Please review the enclosed,and call with any questions or comments, understand that a pre-construction meeting will be setup or 11/07/01,or 11l08/O1. Sincerely, �v Galen Semprebon,P.E. CC: Marcia Banach,Director of Planning 165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Tel: (860)291-8755 -Fax: (860) 291-8757 +.. PFPPM Gutter Flow pnalysia o _ uu r. y CO-4 o o Mp b �bFr. � �f1 4+ d G R C q d ~ 4 cv 6-4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1� 11 12 13 14 15 16 s 5 0 41 0,310 �► o3 ,0 L. o w o n __Pat 10 T Ojq G o% IK7r-r . 10 3, �� � Io .31 , O. . . V �e GI3 .S +_ D O, 011411 a a o � , o$ o,o� .�� a.vd o. ~ o�/0 10 0 0,7 0. o o�Z,o a•�,� ? Q�g�_ Low go t PO IV% L-0 i,w I r) ,0 N Sf4 co h r 7own a,&Soam ?40ZndA0t O � O c .a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f y�SOR-cod AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 9, 2001 Mr. Peter R. DeMallie,Principal Design Professionals, Inc. 165 S. Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re:Preconstruction Meeting—App100-53P, Watson Farms IN ATTENDANCE See Attached The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting: Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations into earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out area and maintained/cleaned out duringconstruction• Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Deming Street. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Engineering Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist (requested, required) for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work C. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six(6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2) inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used-- storm pipe, structures,pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary) of the infrastructure,prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. Progress As Built Plans are to be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to paving and after subgrade formation. 9. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist. 10. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 11. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Edmund Majewski in the field at phone 674-5621. 12. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 13. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 14 Forty-eight(48)hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 15. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 16. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m.,no work on Sunday. 17. DOT permit needed for all work within state road. Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 18. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 19. Extra care must be taken when compacting around structures such as catch basins and manholes. These spots often become problem areas in the future due to settling, therefore, the town staff/inspectors will be requesting additional compaction tests in these areas. 20. Inspection of gravel access roads required prior to placement of topsoil. 21. Sanitary lateral locations should be tied down to existing structures and shown on the progress as-builts. 22. For concrete sidewalks, 8"depth with reinforcements is required at driveway crossings. If the sidewalk is constructed before lot development,the locations must be indicated on the as-built plans. If a proposed driveway location is moved,the sidewalk must be removed to the nearest expansion joint and rebuilt to the proper depth with reinforcement. 23. If a concrete monument is located within a driveway, a cast iron frame and cover must be provided for town public improvement specifications. 24. During construction of individual sanitary sewer house laterals, the contractor shall prepare an as-built sketch on standard form provided by the Engineering Department. This form should be submitted to the design engineer/surveyor for their use in preparing the as-built plan. The Engineering Department suggests that the contractor also show locations of foundation drains and water laterals on this form. 25. During construction for individual house lots, lot to lot drainage must be addressed with drainage swales as necessary. For lawn establishment, town staff will be requiring erosion control measures to be installed prior to the issue of the certificate of occupancy to ensure soil stabilization. A detailed erosion control plan must be implemented and depicted on the plot plan for review prior to the issuance of the building permit—most particularly on lots with extensive grading. 26. WPCA industrial permits for sanitary sewer, one permit for building. Planning Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. 3. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting (if required)to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 through 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building_Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. 2. Postal Service should be contacted regarding the number and placement of mail boxes Sincerely, oc&& Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kag cc: Jeffery Doolittle, Town Engineer Karl Reichle,Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control CL&P SNET I r tOW N se', C'j " 7OW;n ale S.OUL4iVZnd6at k f m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 30, 2001 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: Watson Farms Dear Mr. Sager: At our November 13, 2001, meeting the Planning&Zoning Commission approved your request to use bituminous concrete in place of the concrete sidewalks at Watson Fauns. Si cerely, Michele L. ipe Assistant Director of Planning MLL:kag 02-11-2001 13:24 FROM-Metro Realty +8606776919 T-302 P.002/004 F-901 woI o+ str'vu1 CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY Via Fr esimile &First Class Mail Michael J-Ward -administrator nQuItifatnfly underwriting October 26, 2001 �Y'Technical See mices Mr. Gooffrey W. Sager (ear or s"i The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Uu� Farnah.;ton, CT 06032 y1i. mi Re: Watson Farm &Ilzte CHFA #01-007M Dear Afr. Sager: You hr.ve inquired regarding the advisability of increasing the site budget for additional sidewalk costs a:Watson Farm in South Windsor. iThe Watson Farm site layout by the landscape architect, Raymond Jefferson, i.; Metro's typical layout For elderly housing in which serpentine sidewalks meandering throughout the site and courtytLrd gathering places provide both functional and recreational pedestrian :gays for the elderly. Due to your unigUe'design feature that provides entry to all apartment units at rade and without steps, Thus enhancing compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act(AI)A), the lineal footage•of sidewalk is more extensive than required of a typical elderly project, or on a comparative basis aay single family subdivision, if the construction of the sidewalk is as crrefully executed as in your previous projects and the landscaping and planting are executed as you.have delineated on the eorstruction documents, we believe the project should be both attractive and successful. i Be advised that CHFA's approval for mortgage funding and housing tax credit:,was based upon an the ovE rail fixed hard cost structure which fits tightly within the overall funding plan for Watson Farm. Considering the limited funds available, particularly in light of recent market pricing for your tax credit equity, which adversely impacts your projected budget, the value added to this development by installing concrete sidewalks instead of bituminous concrete is not warranted by the additional expense. Eliminating features such as air condhioning, appliances of fire suppression in exchan;e for concrete sidewalks is not acceptable since these items fulfill our requirements for decent. safe and sanitary housing. Sincerely, Michae a J. Wa W. MJW/J aaj 1CCh1mjw'sager-ws[son.doc j ��S�NCi FjN y i cc: A. Burow Jf 999 West Street/Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067-4005/860-721-9501 Q� THE METRO REALTY GROUP, LTD. January 2, 2001 Marcia Banach Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Re: Watson Farm South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: Enclosed herewith please find the official request to the Secretary of OPM requesting that The Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan 1998-2003 Locational Guide Map be amended to designate the Watson Farm development parcel as "Neighborhood Conservation Area" or "Growth Area",rather than"Conservation Area." i I have enclosed herewith an email from John Radacsi at OPM saying that it would be helpful to have supporting documentation from the chief elected official and the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. I would like to follow up with you to see how we should respond to this request. Thank you for your assistance in that regard. Very Truly Yours, THE METRO REALTY GROUP,LTD. Geoffrey W. Sage�Pr sident Enclosure: Copy of Section of OPM map and legend 10 Executive Drive • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAPUBLIC\South Windsor\Letters\Banach-Redesignation Request.doc TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: t CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON «{Phone No. MY 41 Address M*An? I't Site Name {. PA Z,,��No. Owner on ry rW1 su 9,4"J ' P NO' hdne No. 5 ) Contractor Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Engr. Dater O _: CHANGE: (Describe location and nal;gro 911change. Include Four 4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) s } l ,� +Ft vet '/ # t 11 ( �d 1 w [r f ( Reason .for Changer (Why is change required) iA rr , a ►rc g APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: 1LJq10 Town Engineer Date: )z f r// 6 Dix. of Put C orks Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: ` 441 A+y pan I c11 f. \ite - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant . k Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department VL/Ct iE: "-Tr 0^1 do 7-op ✓y 54 1 jlA,hi wtuwr 6 ) 5 0 y D E C D State of Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development March 1,2002 RE Mr. Walter J. Mealy, Chairman MAR 5 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor SCIJTH'`,iGdGSG"" 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development Federal HOME Program Watson Farm Apartments, South Windsor,CT Dear Mr. Mealy: Please find attached for your review a copy of the Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds concerning the above project. This project is being partially funded by the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development through the use of Federal HOME program funds. This notice constitutes the required dissemination actions pursuant to 24 CFR 58.43. Any written comments should be directed to Mr. Chet Camarata, Department of Economic and Community Development. Sincerely, Div..�;;��,ts.•-��.x��.rs�ss..� William P. Frederick Supervising Architectural Design Reviewer W PF/wf Enclosure cc: Chet Camarata 505 Hudson Street,Hartford,Connecticut 06106-7106 An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer An Equal Opportunity Lender COMBINED NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS State of Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development 505 Hudson Street, Hartford, CT 06106 These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by the grantee through federal HOME funds provided by the State of Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about March 19, 2002, the State Department of Economic and Community Development will submit a request to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of federal HOME Investment Partnership funds under the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, as amended, to undertake a project known as Watson Farm Apartments for the purpose of constructing 72 units of elderly housing for low-moderate income residents at 700 Deming Street in South Windsor, CT. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The Department of Economic and Community Development has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at the Department of Economic and Community Development, 505 Hudson Street, Hartford, Connecticut and may be examined or copied weekdays between 8:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual, group, or agency disagreeing with this determination or wishing to comment on either the project or the intent to request a release of funds may submit written comments to Chester Camarata, Certifying Officer, Department of Economic and Community Development. All comments received by March 18, 2002 will be considered by DECD prior to submission of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify which Notice they are addressing. RELEASE OF FUNDS The Department of Economic and Community Development certifies to HUD that Chester Camarata in his capacity as Certifying Officer consents to accept the `a jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD's approval of the certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities, and allows the Department of Economic and Community Development to use Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO THE RELEASE OF FUNDS HUD will consider objections to its release of funds and the Department of Economic Development's certification for a period of fifteen days following the anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only if it is on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the DECD; (b) the DECD has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 58; (c) the grant recipient has committed funds or incurred costs not authorized by 24 CFR-Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another Federal Agency acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58) and shall be addressed to the HUD Hartford Office at One Corporate Plaza, 191h Floor, Hartford, CT 06103. Potential objectors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period. Individuals who need this information in alternative format must contact Ms. Marcia Bonitto, ADA Coordinator, at (860) 270-8025 Agency programs are administered in a manner consistent with State and Federal Laws. Chester Camarata, Certifying Officer (860) 270-8140 Date: March 1, 2002 OPPORTUNITY G &W MANACIEMENT, INC. 102 PITkIN STREET • P.O. BOX 280928 • EAST HARTFORd, CT 06128,0928 • (860) 282-7377 • FAx (860) 282.7811 RECEIVE® March 12, 2002 Metro Construction MAR 14 2002 6 Executive Dr. South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY Farmington, CT 06032 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Attn: Ed Maj ewski Dear Mr. Majewski: I am the property manager for Porters Share on Shares Lane in South Windsor. The construction-taking place next door from your project, Watson Farm, is blowing dust and dirt on to Porters Share's buildings, facing your project. I am asking if you could arrange to have the buildings power washed so as to restore them to their original state of cleanliness. Thank you for your help with this situation. I can be reached at (860) 282-7377. Sincerely, Gerald Bender Property Manager G&W Management CC:Jeff Folger Environmental Planner South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor,CT 06074 And Board of Directors member c " �bf�,. vM"o L - 4`7 4 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: Q CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON MCC Phone No. 64 kj 9(IZ Address ' It r AG• HA"T h i ..ft 8 . Or. MOLD Site Namel"rsw EMM P&Z No. OwnerMA 09,M A(SM!Aim L111 i PAb A*jQ j0-Phone No. Contractor Signature of Owner Date: 3Q 7.. Signature of Design Engr Date: 3 CHANGE: (Describe location a d nature of change. Include Four (4�) copies r tM f iiP 1l /V� l ofplan/pprofille of Change. ) INSofL " 7 ,: J'W/f-r ', /ms b#yW Mt /r✓1W.�i�i F+ f ao Reason for Change: Why is change required) APPROVALS: (As Required Dir. Of Plannin Y Date: Town , Engineer g t.=, -� � �C�� . Dater Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department MONUMENT COORDINATES: P� O 77 3• da NORTHING EASTING I0 35.7742.3786 659724.6682 z jR.1 02 358392.3817 660012.8146 six 3 x�� 30 358474.0533 659830.5527 D M1d. t I2 O I �'j-13' O 81T. CURB (TYP.) INSTALL STOP BAR AND SIGN ' .1,9. INSTALL SIGN "KEEP RIGHT" °,2,o b 00+I �� 0 © INSTALL SIGN "DO NOT ENTER" .. s R=35' R=35' \ +•' E Wes — I iv 8T 3'o2y0 3gP�p I d 4,jOt pP a / lSis Np LP I.P. �$ 1.27'-W 47' 'R 4.81'-S 66.91' ' LEGEND S7o•2 S 69'10'44" E ® IRON PIN TO BE SET A — • EXISTING IRON PIN ■ EXISTING MONUMENT �.�_ — — — --- — -- — — a DUMPSTER PAD SCREENED WITH VEGETATION 83.8 IN our (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) r- 860.291 . 8755 GRAPHIC SCALE - LSO lr t!LAH 20 41pr 80 e s I n _ ( IN FEET ) O e S S I O n I S inc ■ DESIGN:KMI DRA WN.•KIWI CNEC 9(1 1 inch = 40 ft. ! Civil Engineers Planners • Surveyors • CIS JOB NO.: 7270 1 DATE: Nov. 3, 165 south satellite road south windsor ' connecticut 06074 DRAWING NO.; 1270 1270-03,dw /towM aft � v Z ,t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 SGR.00 TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 To: Ed Majewski, Superintendent, Watson Farms From: Jeffrey Folger, Environmental Planned/Conservation Officer Town of South Windsor Date: May 13, 2002 Based on an inspection of the site on May 10, 2002 the following improvements needed to be accomplished at the Watson Farms construction project. Neither the detention basin nor the'stormwater swale have been completed with respect to final, permanent stabilization. The stormwater structures need to be topsoiled and have permanent, vegetative cover established per the approved plans. This needs to be done immediately. No paving will be authorized by this office until the slopes of both structures have established permanent vegetative cover on them Questions can be addressed to this office at 644-2511 x229. cc. Town Engineer Director of Planning 04/04/02 15:45 FAX 860 526 6054 DESIGN GROUP ONE 1@02 '. 04-04-2002 14:47 FRM-Metro Realty +6606TT6919 T-036 P.002/002 F-738 RECEEIVED vows or scL ummcm APR 1 2 2002 am"r aft= cmumm Fm 6xss % ADMZ I waxcm SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. is E8FlLaL s �ir� � G$" SSte is ! Pis ao. Oisn Phone r>It0 4:10 film cy �A cantmLawr Sig nallu" of Owa Date t 919nat:ure of Design .• bate F* CRUGE9 (116scs;J.be lecazion &lnd i OhariOl. sacluda Pb� (41 copios of plan! off change. ) POP Reason efte 'h-ngas (d4y is ah=Wa red) p J ARIPROVMA a (As saw4red j air. Of P:LazLnS.n j t To►MM rmgLibcus pate t Mr. of gttbltc norlea Dates d1ai�1 Dace l eTIP" GQIQIRMS 3 , Wtts.ta - Town mgiaaer allow #pplicant: Lr PLnk - D. eeecr of pla4mLaq r ldenzad - Engineering Departoennt i RAYMONDE JEFFERSW LANDSC4PEARCH/TECT CHE57EM CT O6412 Tel 860512692I0 February 27,2002 Marcia Banak, Director of Planning South Windsor Town Hall i:`, .I� 1 ZOOZ 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms. Banak: RE:Watson Farm,South Windsor I meet with the landscape contractor to review the Plant List and Specifications for Watson Farms. (Refer to attached Plant Material Ust) He has the following concerns. 1. Using 'Patmore' Green Ash and Red Sunset Red Maple in a natural landscape. I approved substituting the"Patmore"Green Ash with native Green Ash and Red Sunset Red Maple with native Red Maple. 2. Availability of Norway Spruce size and quantity proposed. I approved White Spruce as an alternative. 3. Error in specification of Azalea size of 18-24" Ht. I approved changing size from 18"-24" Ht. To 18"-24"Spread. 4. Limiting choose of Rhododendron the Scintilation variety. I approved Rhododendron that grows to 6'Ht.to 8'Ht.with pink,lavender or white flowers. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincer , Raymo E.J erson Copy: Peter Dunn 04/04/02 15:45 FAX 860 526 6054 DESIGN GROUP ONE 0 04 1 , ir BUF_ R:BLANTING PROFILE: MAT�JRE' v��.x�- •' rA PLAWNi `E � Cm �tnlb � r �(h: , cam+-• a/d. dku & IdGRR � xYr�` 3S 7b'/ op` oilCP G t1Cs.>!�R fi10h1 k1Nlx pt�.tt try►fz. tlt� ? '!Q so' VeTs �c p�euN1►� cM�k�I FICA• •mommapoup '�'�.� �. lip,/is' Twuttp*Rc.uwv r4-urt t f t N Upp H vyM?k1�0 a.6'WT �9 eo'AD, la c Kota W l 4muc tr• ro-6'H'C %so bZ W.4m'p( bpr.ULS- 1b'4NT MAN, Irj f o/b0� c ICt►,v vopto 1111.1116.0" Is SG�T1e-sJ+t>al'1 p11�OtaC1�D�ff z4�'SO�� �lzy WI t 6 A , fINakfatINCIA TMN ?%M J �t}of I►iWROI ESA, a4 d' �b � 15� Uazu�u►�M�+���Iv�t�, to-za ur �i�GRl�1M�e0I1� Mµ`C b1+1Ct. Y ID-Z93PIC Ity b'15` p1yl+� Wt11 %U f ift �Fi�RWa11• l�q1�f� � %Ttm d1 W111`1'1elCw+�FR,A� p' i ow "'**At4,4W Cp&epLVArTpt4/M-04IPt=Ylilc tilt New W^Uv N +H�.T4.0Aa PPLW I,N�„ r C1fe'�rl' ►T► l �t+1b Mal�.� t'�•) MIX by 'h`WMiyli i I J�t1D V{�Nt� ?6AW.IrkA �tr' �e�Ta'�'tt"1Gpf—ClaU�1"`t'�v�f't•►+t1, ' '�. L ADE -L,AIv YMOND';rFERS N'LANDSCAPleARCHITECT CESTER, CONIITPCTICUT_ SHEET WA TSON ,FARM L-1 .�Na-' IDATE 11/3/200o L--1 DRY MWO ao_• SOUM VU41MR CONNEMCUr 04/04/02 15:45 FAX 860 526 6054 DESIGN GROUP ONE Q 07 RA MOM F. 6M�/NSTJ�T CFK57m* CTI472 Tel(.AID Apr#4.2002 Marcia Banak Director of Planning South WiuKdsor Town Halt 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 Dear Ms.Bank: RE--Watson Farm,South Windsor I meet with the Landscape contraMor to review the Plant List and Specifications for Watson Farms. (Refer to attached plant Material List) He has the following concerns. 1. Using 'Patmore' Green Ash and Red Sunset Red Maple in a natural landscape. I approved substituting the mPaimore"Green Ash with native Green Ash and Red Sunset Red Maple with native Red Maple. 2. Aveftiity of Norway Spruce size and•quantity proposed. I approved White Spruce as an alternative 3. Error in specification of Azalea size of 18-2a' HL I approved changing size from 18"-24" R. To 1 g'-2C Spread: 4. lJrrtiting choose of Rhododendron the Scindlation variety.I approved Rhododendron that grows to 614t.to 8'Ht.with pink,lavender or white flowers. Please call me K you have any questions. Sincerely. Raym *effrson Copy.Peter Dunn J 04/04/02 15:45 FAX 860 526 6054 DESIGN GROUP ONE 008 i i BLTFE ' siP G L)ROFILE:,,MATURE' <'����' , i RD 1Cl�1«l1lt� pQlCkttARQ � � . PLANV t� bras. � i!loave>=; wr•/ 1 bb iNlr- 1Cf4' MDI -3�t�„1- 'SOS/ 'SDI �P UI NTtLI��R•tlC�'F�1t f1ON INL� PEAR trL'fZ.'rt./4l- ? �D�/ zoo l>4Ms pt3 WT. LI �'/20s P Q1NU'a Mp ttmt'Itilf b-6,ur ' eon/40 p tiDlxW yr¢1,1COIL (e-6'i1rC 57 GO J,O a x Nomw 4 Pf.UCJ L %ep'vier MIN rp fox �'1WJA at t. � Ti°rl Y.,�Itr�ep,�>D d��1i-Ti '�11��'14i�C1OM 1F.IV�LSDl�Dir�} Z4„bC�� 121,. � �� PI t'r+IN * r&%4%*GArxH�AFZtN�L1A Z'���114p�P�.GI �a=Z4'1 r 1?.•b tg �,bellkl ool PYc y ftpA1C�br"Y Ib-L9sp1G ►zb w4jow3 G1r1/ 1 in1�1 ccm aw b al M-bo�•T� gap Wrc mi NlUM C01:11b"11"Fwa0p vK(m ft0% -b fT% f' b� la'�b' • 4• r-r-Y �r v4l%vm?JLw MAW SAP t l' wri.�llD Go�4r�RYPrrarl/W14•P44Vr—T40A W VAw" wwk4A 1 %HI n^hd m&w ,Nr-���b �rLp41L7l{ w�1lF•�1M(Fp4'1'o�ri Mlri bY 11bq Rhtx��D Ww'7�+P !`►�R,��.+ r (�olC�-V.%"CN b%ftkt%b A%cb a �tr Cl��'�aTf�P1CJr1..CDl�kT�fbi�.L�pW1 � '. LAND :A.PE PL�N�' YIVIOND,c'�7� FERS N'IX SCAP�ARCHITECT: CESTER, CONNOCTICUT, SHEET WA TSON FARM L-1 DES►+.• UVRAW, D EMIING STREET �"No: IDAa:- »iJ12000 : L-1 SOUTH W MR - CONNIMCUT DHAINNG NO.: s Memorandum To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer Date: 12/10/02 Re: Watson Farms Site Plan Bond I have received a bond request for the Watson Farms Project on Deming Street. I recommend a bond amount be set at $75,000 to cover the remaining site work to be completed on this project. Please call me if you have any questions. \\TOWN_HALL\VOL2\ENGINEER\DOOLIT\Planning Reviews\WatsonFarmsSiteBond.doc TIOWn 0-1 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 ,�OSOR.Co TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 } December 10, 2002 Mr. Jeff Sager The Metro Reality Group, LTD 10 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: Watson Farm Site Plan 00-53P Dear Mr. Sager: We understand that Certificates of Occupancy will soon be requested for the Watson Farms Development, although the site work is not complete. In accordance with Sections 8.1.10 and 8.1.11 of the Zoning Regulations the Town of South Windsor requires a bond be posted to cover any unfinished site work, final grading, and as- built drawings prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The estimated cost of the unfinished site work, final grading and as-built plans for the Watson Farms development is $75,000. A copy of this estimate using the Town of South Windsor Bond Estimate Form is attached. Also enclosed is the Town's policy on Site/Subdivision Surety and a W-9 form that must be completed and returned with a cash bond. Please post this bond with the Town of South Windsor Planning Department prior to requesting a Certificate of Occupancy. You can reach me at 644-2511 ext. 245 if you have any questions. We look forward to the successful completion of the Watson Farms Development. Sincerely, Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E., Town Engineer Cc: Murcia Banach, Director of Planning John Collins, Chief Building Official Enc. �40wM at, 101es� �• •. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 ANosoR.co TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 Y December 16, 2002 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 A Re: 00-53P, Watson Farm Dear Mr. Sager: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 16, 2002, to set the site improvements bond for Appl 00-53P, Watson Farm at$75,000.00. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of mylars and issuance of building permits. Sincerely, Kevin McCann, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission KMcC/kah cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10-1 Z 1 . ' r s P APPLICANT NAME WjL.Lai -Ryrn Assn)(- L�)n (W 4n&f-J'L� ADDRESS CD �X�' c��✓L ,��ye, yvn Ins Cii o 32- PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS K d � LOT P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER ©Q'53P \Ah Sp g J A&vw, SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER 5 coo ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNTS (Z)OQ, a - }�/�-((t�v,l�S YM.� u'1 611c1 Please release the bond indicated above as all of the required work has been completed. NAME DATE 177 19/6 Z-- BY CHECK # ISSUED DATE C IDocunenu and Senuigs,4dtnuusualonLocal Sertmgs.Temp BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 082'01.doc WATSON FARM ASSOCIA TES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECEIVED DEC 13 2002 South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY d� CONSERVATION COMMISSION December 11, 2002 f 5 `Q n Marcia Banach Town Planner Town of South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Watson Farm South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: The undersigned hereby respectfully requests a reduction in the Storm Water Control Bond, securing the obligation of the developer of Watson Farm from$25,000 to $10,000. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very Truly Yours, WATSON FARM ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Watson Farm GP, LLC Geoffrey W. Sa r ember 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax MApartment Developments\Watson Farm-South Windsor\P&Z\Banach-Reduction in Bond Request.doc i NOV 2 5 2003 Memorandum ' 3P To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer (J Date: 11/25/03 C� Re: Watson Farms Site Plan Bond Reduction have received a request to reduce the bond for the Watson Farms Project on Deming Street. I recommend a bond amount be reduced to $7,500 to cover the remaining site work to be completed on this project. Please call me if you have any questions. SAENGINEER\DOOLIT\Planning Reviews\WatsonFarmsSiteBondReduction.doc SAWN Sf4 J074C SiOt� V&U&ot a U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-0) AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 10, 2003 Mr. Geoffrey W.-Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: 00-53P, Watson Farm Dear Mr. Sager: The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letters of Credit-.- PROJECT(S) BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Watson Farms Peoples $75,000 12/17/03 Watson Farms Peoples $10,000 12/17/03 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an'amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period,from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly? Very truly yours, 14 Michele R. Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kak S 0%qN a eti �-� olre S-OtdlT ?d � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 ��Oson'co TELEPHONE(860) 644-2511 December 1, 2003 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: Appl 00-53P, Watson Farm Site Bond Reduction Dear Mr. Sager: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on November 25, 2003,to reduce the site bond for the above-referenced project from$75,000.00 to $7,500.00. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official International Department people§bank People's Bank Bridgeport Center, 850 Main Street Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604-4913 203.338.4155 or 203.338.4157 r Fax:203.338.4608 Telex:6813363 t 2003 December 4, 2003 Town of South Windsor %(",� 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 v5 ATTN: Planning and Zoning Gentlemen, At the request of our customer, Watson Farm - Dunn Sager Interests, we enclose our amendment to Irrevocable Letter of Credit Nr. S13-1258 in your favor. We would greatly appreciate if you would acknowledge receipt by signing where indicated on the copy of the amendment, and returning this signed copy in the enclosed envelope. Your prompt attention will be greatly appreciated. ards Debbie Torres International Department encls V. Marcia Banach Release of Bond Watson Farm Page 1 From: "Wendy Paciotti"<wpaciotti@metro-realty.com> To: <banach@southwindsor.org> Date: 1/22/04 12:24PM Subject: Release of Bond -Watson Farm 001" Could you please add us to the agenda for next week's planning and zoning commission meeting?The subject would be release of bond SB 1258($7,500) for work to be performed at Watson Farm (fixing/filling the puddle that formed after rain). Work was completed and Town Engineer has recorded that work is complete as of 12/22/03. Thank you. I can be reached at 860-674-5641 with any questions. GEOFFREY W. SAGER c/o Wendy L. Paciotti The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 (860)674-5629 (860)677-6919 Fax e-mail:wpaciotti@metro-realty.com CC. Geoff Sager <gsager@metro-realty.com> I �t ` t f � Memorandum RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2004 To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer Date: 1/29/04 Re: Watson Farms Site Plan Bond Reduction I have received a request to release the $7,500 bond for the Watson Farms Project on Deming Street. The outstanding items have been completed including the installation of an extra yard drain. Therefore, I recommend that this bond be released. Please call me if you have any questions. S:\ENGINEER\DOOLIT\Planning Reviews\WatsonFarmsSiteBondRelease.doc WATSON FARM ASSO CIA TES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP //Ily March 12, 2004 RECEIVE® Jeff Doolittle MAR 15 2004 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Release of the Wetlands (10,000) and Erosion& Sediment(20,000) Bonds Dear Mr. Doolittle: The undersigned hereby respectfully requests the release of the captioned bonds for the Watson Farm senior housing development on Route 30 South Windsor. Thank you for your review of this matter. Very Truly Yours, WATSON FARM ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Watson Farm GP, LLC B Geoffrey W. Saj\er mber, - 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax PAApartment Developments\Watson Farm-South Windsor\P&Z\Bond Release Request.doe . BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL DATE : 9`?)O q l� APPLICANT NAME soy) i-a✓a, Ass c. .L^A--6; ADDRESS ('0 X P P A -Lt Vr- �t°� Jr- (\,T � PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS WCA T-5oYr ►-,j LOT P&Z OR IWA/CC APPLICATION NUMBER 50(Uo ( �, - �n�sa�i^S 410,000. SUB ACCOUNT NUMBER Sbpp 'moo;000 ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNTZo� Please -release the bond indicated above as all of the required work has been completed. -�Y � ` i f NAME DATE By Y.LAVt- � CHECK # ISSUED DATE C.Ommnenu and Seaurgs-,Admuusrraror\Local Senuigs.Temp BOND RELEASE TRANSMITTAL 092-01.doc .�oW N Sf4 x F Town op s-outlz ?d 5 r. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 4f�°soR'c°� TELEPHONE (860) 644 2511 September 14, 2004 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: Appl 00-53P, Watson Farm Site.Bond Release(Landscaping-IWA/CC) Dear Mr. Sager: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on September 7, 2004 to release the landscaping bond in the amount of$20,00.00 and the IWA/CC bond in the amount of $10,000.00 for the above-referenced project. Arrangements have been made with the Finance Department to forward a check releasing these funds. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official _53� <0w H 8F� C + Y 7own V/ SV U'N 1, ? Alvl� .Ci S � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 '�OsoR CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 February 3, 2005 Ms. Betsy Clifford 1 Financial Plaza Hartford, CT 06103 Attn: International Dept/RC 12-287 Dear Ms. Clifford: This is to inform you that we are the beneficiaries of People's Bank Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. SB-1258'dated December 12, 2002, in the amount,of US$7,500.00 for account of Dunn Sager Interests O'Meara Farm LLC and Watson Farm Associates, LP. Please be advised that we returned the original Letter of Credit to Metro Realty and they misplaced the People's Bank original Letter of Credit No. SB-1258. Please accept this letter as our instructions to cancel your Letter of Credit No. SB-1258, notwithstanding the fact that the original Letter of Credit has been lost. We agree to hold People's Bank free and harmless against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, suits or damages whatsoever arising there from,including costs and expenses. We also agree to return to you the original Letter of Credit if found. Very truly yours, Michele M. R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MMRL/pmm SOW N Sf4 To� O-P Sot� V&U&ot .1 V 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 oR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 February 17, 2004 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: App100-53P, Watson Farm Site Bond Dear Mr. Sager: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on February 10, 2004 to release the site bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$7,500.00. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Sincerely, Ccy� Timothy H. Wentzell, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: Town Engineer Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date C pages From Co./Dept. Co. Phone# Phone# Fax# �d ��� s - +� Fax# WATSON FARMASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 00-63? May 9, 2005 tin'vvir\dsor.NG Jeff FolgerowF�` Town of South Windsor coNS�R 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Release of the Stormwater Control Structures $10,000 Letter of Credit(SB-1257) Dear Mr. Folger: The undersigned hereby respectfully requests the release of the captioned Letter of Credit for the Watson Farm senior housing development on Route 30 South Windsor. Thank you for your review of this matter. Very Y Trul Yours , WATSON FARM ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Watson Farm GP, LLC By. Geoffrey". ager, Member 6 Executive Drive,Suite 100 • Farmington,CT 06032-2853 860-674-5641 • 860-677-6919 Fax P:\Apartment Developments\Watson Farm-South Windsor\P&Z\LOC Release Request.doc S0r0" dE, y h •. 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 '�OsoR-CO TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511 .t May 23,2005 Mr. Geoffrey W. Sager The Metro Realty Group, LTD 6 Executive Drive Farmington, CT 06032 Re: Appl 00-53P, Watson Farm Site Bond Release Storm Water Control Dear Mr. Sager: This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on May 10, 2005 to release the storm water control structures bond in the amount of $10,00.00 for the above- referenced project. Please contact our office and we will return the letter of credit we are holding. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy H.4ntzell, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission THW/kak cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Si gnature : 1 Date •OOR nnmrwue ma Ir f wo � A I P O/A I oy„ ALUNINLIA rLtk 1..� • \\\ 1 - jWA — '---_ �� I q� a ► BUFFER PLANTING PROFILE:5 YRS. t LIGHTING DETAILelk N,, A \P \\ z - WETLAN - ` �K-s tl�eVeori\ I I I 1 pL 7\' � L• r, c� _ -R RavrA \ I I - BUFFER PLANTING PROFILE:MATURE "_�_fl••, 1Aetea s{1RUpy a 1 R PLANT MATERIAL �vr .Atzss aeuAxrr NMVCE;wr./*M AL R RUD4.01M IEtP 6UNSL'T' " e � I I �\ p ;� • p 1 ;Sz' � �euN�NET R�NAP}.E oa 4�3 o/n�c4uN�x aKN�otRlc � ZK-5 cru-, . St 7 /s� Y % ' \ I G L +Y II?Ub PL*11{e�!-VhK\Ch Y7QNDI� f-�� I \ • fl- qtL �; cP PTRt cN-�uc`tJ4N'cxaNTlGascR' 50/SD' I I I \ \\' O } �NArkT\G6FiR F+aNSs0.1NlT PC+.R 2-L,/LNCpL. �j bcO zo, .� A A.Mt sNauo.Na,.c+w u r�Qaw"A p E!\J\y e-�'1wr• LI tr0'/so, PG PKUNUN9El�c.I-oUPrP+-UM"NDlRCLOUD . �i�✓✓✓ I \ I '. G/,y P - �� r P Y INURA�1t9RhPWt EPIH6 6-014T 4Z 60/SO' O�h 6 hole +PRUa.O- 6'NT` z5 1,0%boo f I �'.-- \\ 7 , 33WI7f1N4A•3-ry!Y[ 62 *tu wk`( 6PFUuL , \6'VMr MIN. /� 1 '°'7 id T{}UJ►.O�G{DL�NTAd-FS CMCRKZ. , i \ `1 \ ` EMLRAI.P ALOORYITAL 5—WT. " R�- RHODOPEN ORON 4CINCI{.NETIDIN oz xlr�Tl{.uK�oh Fu0000ehDvrrN Z4^Se Mr IL{. \ \ i - * PICRvs JdPOq\GA•M°V41TA:h PICL' MM IIZ 4,116, r \ p o DUN�MN Y1RG aKGN1hG�A10e0FI lLd 'M"-3o,FT. '* ¢YEKGRE61y AZ.V-\P M�7IID�GCIby 16 ' 12b ISM IV I _ „I+� �bplC baR 10 TTkkUN bCRGi I'NAh.1, TYPICAL COURT YARD \ \ GRIMaoN Pt ecMY bAR6pIClCY p-L9 spR Lb 3'!5' +<w.s',I"�LG' I i I ji.. C ♦ \ � o/A cP '14 CUONYMUb A.I.A.'Ny'CDM Od.GTA' ' Pwo-mf WI11GI4D rue"INu'fbubN M-b."wr• M 3'�9• I i - 11•b VAC GINIUM GOR•(gipp U}\' _,` I I A e• I +ilb"xb0ow wa{seRfY z-b1IT.4p, 110 o jb --- >— XF6 11-1.�c VLR IL IU.ATA wII�TCK RiD' , wIN � w111TW4r01 Y tR Ie-z9MT. TtR _ \ .. "�,.,, PI-'RRNIAL w"rwo 1 Wu-, zsa �_ I -- p �.�r Dl�sc.K-0.`�1►.�u`eA+•1,aC - i6w \ —�® — 1_ -- _.� -- — o y'I>✓likNTlll lk NAY W NNp fAIk4'4AM`NFTwoko?"w,Iw I C �� — Nn1 CNLaJ-AqD 0.RONrIOt1 cOF\tC,p�/.pyTpRAT:Dr�MlX b�'ts"Immu—WK-,LMiP PUNY','vt. '9-__� �-. 1 PaC V0.T$NT\oM D!•tilnb.AMP t-tOYir�:r'sti) � y� � �_T �__: r�rD p--� �_ :____ _ __ __- a �1►�N{1 �iC1� - .— .� -D-G—Al—L N—G_S-L—L1�Li�1 — _ E�'M _ _ al-CstsCToZ`Crlu.��yUtTYarra'n��N -------------- LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1-----' ------- ------- --- ----1----- IJwI o1NEN'MSE AREo.E%RTM-1 A REVISIONS :RAYMOND JEFFERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CESTER,CONNECTICUT MATI . SNO M ARE NASED pry AVAhMLE —^- _C MNFC S FIELD M Au E M T UinillTR$NWIU W SHEET eE cN;Lo�A.NN.Eo f,noN,o caxs',NucTI.. GRAPHIC SCALE `Epo�w. SAC'•..1.ALL uININES ARE S W STAKED M ME FlELD `'= WA TSON FARM NI A LK.E TIM LA,.;�N�E.�N NNpR,e L-1 EONS I KARN _* * . i NnS PLAN R M,VAI,D Na.E55 IT BEANSOESiCN.• ORANN.' (y/E'Cl(('Q,• iRi7L lL,T1fSST,IS STREET N,NpE.S I ES .No tlN4N1AL YMA,u,tE I Ile- 4O tL =,� _ lli'1GN71LL1�G ll REE Jl L-1 of NE nNa[svanAt ENGu,[Ea/suNVEvoN. NO. OA iC DESCRIPTION -gY - :y2 �'� .��•' Xe Na: DA W.-111312000 ,, 9�'APe �P�'�.`�,,, ORAWW NO.: SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTIC'UT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ' Senior Housing Deming Street South Windsor, Connecticut November 3, 2000 Prepared for: The Metro Realty Group 10 Executive Drive Farmington,CT 06032 i 1 foo FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040-5921 TEL 860 646-2469 FAX 86o 643-6313 78 Interstate Drive,West Springfield,MA 01089 TEL 413 452-0445 FAX 413 846-0497 ' 140 Sherman Street,Fairfield,CT 06430-5822 TEL 2o3 256-1790 FAX 203 256-5742 The Foundry Corporate Office Center 275 Promenade Street,Suite 350,Providence,RI 02908 TEL 401 861-3070 FAX 401 861-3076 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Senior Housing South Windsor, Connecticut TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SUMMARY SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 IV. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 V. ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' VI. CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendix A - Tables 1 Peak Hour Trip Generation Volumes 2 Level of Service Summary Appendix B -Figures 1 Site Location Map 2 2000 Existing Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M. Peak Hour 3 2000 Existing Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 4 2001 Background Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M. Peak Hour 5 2001 Background Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 6 Percent Trip Distribution 7 Site Generated Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M. Peak Hour 8 Site Generated Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 9 2001 Combined Traffic Volumes Weekday A.M. Peak Hour !� 10 2001 Combined Traffic Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour ■ Appendix C Capacity Analysis Worksheets - Weekday AM Peak Hour Appendix D Capacity Analysis Worksheets -Weekday PM Peak Hour GAP97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd Cones. i Fuss&O'Neill Inc. SUMMARY SHEET As an aid to reviewers,this Executive Summary has been included to outline the various study parameters utilized in this report. Although a full explanation of the study methodologies is included in the text of the report, this summary can serve as a useful reference for reviewers. APPLICANT: The Metro Realty Group,Ltd. SITE ACREAGE: 8.7 Acres+/- DEVELOPMENT SIZE/TYPE: 72 Units of Senior Housing 90 Parking Spaces APPLICATIONS: 1. Special Exception 2. Site Plan f DESIGN YEAR: 2002 (Year construction will be completed) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH FACTOR: 2.0 %per year(Peak Hour) TRAFFIC COUNTS: Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.-August 30, 2000 PEAK HOURS ANALYZED: A.M. Peak Hour-7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. P.M. Peak Hour-4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. EXPECTED TRIP GENERATION: A.M. Peak Hour- 14 trips (10 enter, 5 exit) P.M. Peak Hour- 16 trips (9 enter, 7 exit) CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Technique - 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update (TRB Special Report No. 209) Execution- Synchro Professional Software,Version 4.0 Highway Capacity Software; HCS Software Version 3.1b G:\P97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd Corres. 11 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. I. INTRODUCTION The Metro Realty Group, Ltd. has proposed development of 72 units of Senior Housing on Deming Street (Route 30) in South Windsor, Connecticut, as shown in Figure No. 1 of Appendix B. Fuss&O'Neill,Inc.has been retained to study the traffic impact of the development. proposed p This study has been prepared to document our findings and is being submitted to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission in support of the Special Exception and Site Plan applications. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 8.7 acre(approx.)site is located on the northern side of Deming Street(Route 30),with the Manchester Town line to the east, and retail developments to the south. The property is currently zoned as Rural Residential. Access to the development is proposed to be located on Deming Street. The proposed site drive will intersect Deming Street, approximately 325 feet east of the intersection of Oakland Road and Deming Street at a "T" intersection with a "STOP" sign on the site drive southbound approach. Deming Street(Route 30)is a two-lane roadway,providing a single 13 foot wide travel lane in the southeast direction, and a 16 foot travel lane in the northwest direction along the site frontage and has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. It provides access to the Church of the Living God and residential developments in the vicinity of the site and commercial developments southeast of the site. Fuss&O'Neill placed Automatic Traffic Recorders(machine tube counters)on Deming Street in the vicinity of the Manchester and South Windsor Town lines from August 30 - September 4,2000 to record daily traffic volumes and the 85"percentile speed in each direction. The daily traffic on Deming Street for this time period was found to be approximately 13,000 vehicles per day. The 85"percentile speed for both directions was recorded at 43 miles per hour. To the southeast of the site, Deming Street intersects Hale Road at signalized "T" shaped intersection. Hale Road is a four-lane roadway,which provides access to numerous commercial developments including the Buckland Hills Mall. It has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour and sidewalks are provided on the west side. To the west of the site, Deming Street splits away to the south and Oakland Road becomes Route 30. Oakland Road intersects Foster and Slater Streets at a signalized intersection. Foster Street forms the north leg, while Slater Street forms the south leg. Foster Street is a two-lane residential roadway,which has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Slater Street is a two- lane residential roadway, which has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. G:\P97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd cories. 1 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. To the south of Oakland Road,Deming Street intersects with Imperial Drive at an offset four- legged intersection. Imperial Drive forms the north and south legs of the intersection which are controlled by stop signs. Imperial Drive is a two-lane residential roadway. It intersects Oakland Street at a skewed angle. III. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC In order to determine the traffic impact of the proposed development on adjacent street traffic, manual turning movement counts were performed in the vicinity of the site on Wednesday, August 30, 2000. The 2000 existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure Nos. 2 and 3 of Appendix B. Several approved developments in the vicinity of the site were included in the background p Y g traffic condition. The Lowes,Target, Raymour&Flannigan/Retail Buildings,the hotel on Hale Road and the Newton Senior Living Center in Manchester were included in the background traffic. The Connecticut Department of Transportation has recommended a 2.0 percent per year peak hour growth factor to account for normal traffic growth in the area in recent projects.Therefore, this growth factor was used to project the 2002 conditions. The proposed development is anticipated to be constructed by 2002. These projected volumes, shown in Figure Nos. 4 and 5 of Appendix B,represent the 2002 Background traffic volumes which are defined as design year traffic without the proposed housing development. The potential for traffic impact for this type of development on the adjacent roadway network is greatest during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, the periods when commuter traffic is at the highest levels. The traffic counts indicate that the morning peak hour for the Deming Street is 7:30 to 8:30 A.M., and the afternoon peak hour is 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. Therefore, these peak hours were subsequently analyzed for impacts. IV. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Fuss & O'Neill contacted the Connecticut Department of Transportation(ConnDOT) Bureau of Planning to discuss the trip generation rate for this type of development. The Bureau of Planning stated that based on an age restriction for these housing units, they have historically supported trip generation rates of.20 and.22 during the A.M.and P.M.peak hours respectively. A comparison of these rates to Industry Standards was made using the 1997 Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)publication"Trip Generation". This publication is accepted as the industry standard manual,which provides a compilation of trip generation data for similar elderly housing facilities and data for entering and exiting traffic, relative to the number of housing units. Several land uses within the trip generation manual were reviewed for applicability to the proposed development. Given that the housing will be restricted to older residents, the most GAP97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd comes. 2 IFuss&O'Neill Inc. appropriate land use is ITE Land Use Code 250;Retirement Community. The manual describes the data for this land use as applicable to the following: "...developments restricted to Seniors or senior citizens which contain residential units similar to apartments or condominiums, and are usually self contained villages." It was our finding that the ITE rates were very similar to the rates accepted by the ConnDOT Bureau of Planning and therefore we used the ConnDOT rates to protect site generated traffic. Using the number of units proposed, the ConnDOT rates yields the number of vehicle trips which can be expected to enter and exit the site during peak hours. These trip generation volumes are summarized in Table No. 1 of Appendix A. As shown in Table No. 1, this development is expected to generate 15 trips(10 entering, 5 exiting)during the AM peak hour, and 16 trips (9 entering, and 7 exiting)during the PM peak hour. The distribution of site generated traffic traveling to and from the proposed site, shown in Figure No. 6 of Appendix B was developed based on the existing patterns of traffic on the adjacent roadway network. Using the percent distribution,the site generated traffic was added to the roadway system with the results shown in Figure No. 7 and 8 of Appendix B. These volumes were then added to the background volumes to yield the 2002 Combined Peak Hour traffic volumes shown in Figure Nos. 9 and 10 of Appendix B. 1 V. ANALYSES A. Intersection Capacity Analyses In discussing intersection capacity analyses, two terms are used to describe the operating condition of the road or intersection. These two.terms are volume to capacity ratio (v/c), and level of service(LOS). The v/c ratio is a ratio of the volume of traffic using an intersection to the total capacity of the intersection(the maximum number of vehicles that can utilize the intersection during an hour). The v/c ratio can be used to describe the percentage of capacity utilized by a single intersection movement,a combination of movements,an entire intersection approach,or the intersection as a whole. As the v/c ratio approaches 1, the intersection nears capacity and it may become impossible to accommodate all the vehicles attempting to travel through the intersection. LOS is a measure of the delay experienced by stopped vehicles at an intersection. LOS is rated on a scale from A to F. with A describing a condition of very low delay (less than 10 seconds per vehicle),and F describing a condition where delays will exceed 50 seconds per vehicle for unsignalized intersections and 80 seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Delay is described as a measure of driver discomfort,frustration,fuel consumption,and lost travel time. Therefore, intersections with longer delay times are less acceptable to most drivers. GAP97\97146\A60\T1AS.wpd Corres. 3 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. j LOS is generally used to describe the operation (based on delay time) of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, while v/c ratio is applied to signalized intersections only. These definitions for v/c ratio and LOS, as well as the methodology for conducting signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses,are taken from the"1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update" (Special Report No. 209), published by the Transportation Research Board. In discussing unsignalized intersection capacity analyses,the term "level of service" (LOS) is used to provide a description of the delay and operational characteristics of the turns from the minor street (stop sign controlled) to the major street, and turns from the major street to the minor street. Through vehicles are not delayed by the minor street and do not experience delay, and, therefore, are not rated with a level of service. Using the above referenced methodologies, A.M. and P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were P t3' Y conducted at the following intersections: 1. Oakland Road Route 30 at Foster/Slater Streets nali Si( zed) 2. Deming Street at Imperial Drive 3. Oakland Road(Route 30) at Deming Street 4. Deming Street(Route 30) at Site Drive 5. Deming Street(Route 30) at Hale Road (Signalized) Table No. 2 of Appendix A presents a summary of the levels of service at these intersections for both Background and Combined conditions traffic volumes. Copies of the analysis worksheets can be found in Appendices C and D. Our determination of the traffic impact from the proposed development was made through a comparison of the Background LOS (without the proposed housing development) versus the Combined conditions (with the proposed housing development). As shown in Table No. 2, most of the existing intersections and the proposed site drive intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS C or better in the Combined Conditions after the housing is fully occupied. The existing study intersections will experience minimal increased delays during the peak periods. There are no LOS changes between the Background and Combined conditions.These results reflect the minimal amount of site generated traffic that will be added to the adjacent roadway network. We can therefore conclude that the addition of the site generated traffic will not significantly impact the intersections analyzed. B. Site Drive at Deming Street(Route 30) The new intersection of the proposed site drive at Deming Street (Route 30) will operate favorably at LOS C during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Our analysis has shown that left turns from Deming Street into the site will find sufficient gaps in the opposing traffic to allow a safe left turn to be made into the site with an average of 10-20 seconds of delay to the vehicle. Additionally, left and right turns out of the site are also expected to experience an average of 10-20 seconds of delay per vehicle According to traffic engineering standards,this GAP97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd Corres. 4 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. is an acceptable amount of delay during peak commuter hours and is similar to or less than the average delay experienced at other intersecting streets in the area such as left turns from Deming to Porters Drive. C. Intersection Sight Distance Analysis Intersection sight distances for the proposed site driveway intersection on Deming Street were measured in accordance with ConnDOT guidelines. Upon field investigation,the proposed site driveway will provide 1,000+ feet to the southeast (left). A sight distance of 700 feet to the northwest(right) can be achieved if site frontage is cleared and regrading to the west is done. Eighty-five percentile speed measured by Fuss & O'Neill was found to be 43 mph in each direction on Deming Street in the vicinity of the site. rThe minimum required intersection sight distance as set forth in ConnDOT's "Guidelines for Highway Design" (1999) is 430 feet(130 meters) for sight lines to the left and right of these drives under a design speed of 45 mph(70 kph). It should be noted that the ConnDOT guideline for sight distance entitled"Intersection Sight Distance Criteria;Figure 11-21)"indicates that the table has been adjusted from previous data to account for elderly drivers. Slower design speed sight distance criteria in the table have been adjusted to increase the required sight distance to account for slower reaction times of the elderly driver. Based on our field measurements and the ConnDOT criteria, the proposed site drives will provide ample sight distances for the proposed development. It is recommended that the proposed site frontage be cleared and that the existing berm be graded back to the west to optimize the sight distance. D. Accident History Accident data was compiled from the Connecticut Department of Transportation p p p on(ConnDOT) for Deming Street and Oakland Road (Route 30) in the site vicinity. None of the study area along Route 30 are included in the ConnDOT Suggested List of Surveillance Study Sites (SLOSSS) for the years 1995-1997. Within the time frame compiled,no identifiable accident patterns were observed on Route 30. The limited increase in traffic generated b the proposed development is not expected to cause Y p p p p any appreciable change in accident frequencies. VI. CONCLUSIONS The purpose of preparing a Traffic Impact study is to identify the impact of the proposed development's site generated traffic. The proposed Senior Housing project is projected to generate a total of 15 trips during the AM peak hour,and 16 trips during the PM peak hour. As determined by our analysis, these trips can be serviced by available roadway capacity of the GAP97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd Corres. 5 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. adjacent roadway network. All intersections considered by this statement were found to operate acceptably with the addition of the site generated traffic. Our review of the accident history data revealed no existing safety problems within the site vicinity. It is recommended that the proposed site frontage be cleared and regrading to the west to optimize the sight distance. Based on the foregoing study, it is the professional opinion of Fuss & O'Neill that the Senior Housing development will not have a significant impact on the traffic operations in the vicinity of the site. GAP97\97146\A60\TIAS.wpd Corres. 6 � W a � a H t Fuss&O'Neill Inc. TABLE 1 PEAK HOUR SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Senior Housing South Windsor, Connecticut 72 DWELLING UNITS AM Peak Hour* PM Peak Hour HTGR** Trips HTGR Trips Enter .13 10 .13 9 Exit .07 5 .09 7 Total .20 15 .22 16 Trip generation data is based on rates accepted by the State Traffic Commission for active Senior housing developments * Peak Hour Of Adjacent Street Traffic ** Hourly Trip Generation Rate per(trips dwelling it p p g unit) Fuss&O'Neill Inc. TABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Senior Housing South Windsor, Connecticut 2002 A.M. PEAK HOUR 2002 P.M. PEAK HOUR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS* (Critical Movements) Background Combined Background Combined Deming Street at Imperial Drive A A A A Deming Street at Oakland Street(Route 30) B B B B Deming Street(Route 30) at Site Drive NA C NA C SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS** Oakland Road(Route 30) at Slater/Foster Streets .49/A .49/A .51/A .51/A Deming Street Route 30 at Hale Road .37/A .36/13 .71/13 .718 *Values indicated are Level of Service(LOS) **Values indicated are v/c Ratio/LOS NA=Not Applicable i i i i i i i APPENDIX B FIGURES +�■� rr �r r �r �r r� �r r �r �r rr +� � r r r � r a �R0'�_1� �� �DRGAD Zvi o t ✓� ~442 2�4 4 2 Z 3j2 `► ~9j2 3;,2 y � 4 / �2° p� °1 / Now j,° 2� / •� 9 39 4 2A / /` R DEMING Gs STREET W N� TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 2 / TOWN f' ass & ONEEL uvcc..,a��T,..�, / OF ' O 1�6 HARTFORD ROAD.MANCHESTER.CONNECTICUT 06040 t2033 646-2169 / MANCHESTER / SENIOR HOUSING / 2000 EXISTING CONDITIONS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR / a a PROD. NO., 97146A60 DATE- 10/24/2000 SCALE, N.T.S. rr �r �r r rr rr rr ■r r rr ai rr �r �r rr rr r r rr �w O OU 30 o`n .�69 1 ( 466 3s 63 ti 10 1 �• A FSO6 /S11, `44 fAA °� p t / \a`N r0 >0 y r`"2 � N 30� RG30 DEMING / Q, G S STREET �' / '3 3EE?' y� TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / / FIGURE 3 / TOWN ass & MUHL INCH,,"ati„o rngi.••m / OF 7 146 HARTPORD R D.NANCNESTER,CONNECTICO 06040 j' CE03)646-2469 / MANCHESTER / M SENIOR HOUSING / 2000 EXISTING CONDITIONS / WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR / a � a I PROJ. NO.: 97146A60 DATE: 10/24/2000 SCALE: N.T.S. r�■ it �r r rr r r� rr r rr � r � i r rr rr� i■r r 0 CIO Rom 'v 1 ss ^a z 390 ~493 ~ 9 / 390 �1 0� 01 �2ti r` 8 11 i�o� / 42 2 0� / / R,5to DE�,�,o` ,E3 DEMING / w l "�YG SIRE$ STREET / 0 T ti y� TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / s / / FIGURE 4 / TOWN ass & ONEKL INCc,..dtbw .. / OF go )�6 NARTFORO ROAD.MANCNESTER.CONNECT)CUT 060+6 C209)646-2469 / MANCHESTER / SENIOR HOUSING / 2002 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS / WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR / a aa. PROJ. NW 97146A60 DATE, 10/24/2000 SCALE, N.T.S. �r rs rr rr r� rr rr r r rr ar r� r rr rr rr r r� rr wti ° RO�3o w° �Ro z�a k- �1 S2q ti �0,� 1 r► S8S�► ~S83 / A � ✓g2 0 �-4 49$ti r.l 81 0j8 DP 'E30 DEMIN / w ti Gs STREET TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 5 / TOWN � FM & ONML INC.cr E gi ..�, / OF ' 146 M-TF040 ROAD.IIANC-STM C-ECTICUT 060 0 @OW 646-2469 / MANCHESTER SENIOR HOUSING / 2002 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS / WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR / a a PROD. NO.: 97146A60 DATE, 10/24/2000 SCALE. N.T.S. r rr �■r r r r r ri r r r s rr �r r� r r r■r ri �w p 0trr�3o wo ' `4NIj c 0i) 4p•� R r SITS45j ti ~fqS%) SS/, / (4 - DEMING �, / / ���1 DE�11�rE3o STREET � / ,r�'� Gs / 40 TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 6 / TOWN _!� Fuss TF o MA INC cD�� 144 NIWTFOgO RWDM�/ OF �V . NCHESTER,CWINECTICUT 04040 C203)644-2469 !n / MANCHESTER / m SENIOR HOUSING / PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION / NOTE: ARRIVALS & DEPARTURES / ARRIVALS:XX% DEPARTURES:00M) a / a I PROJ. NO.- 97146A60 DATE 10/24/2000 SCALE, N.T.S. o RG o, 30 co Rom �1 SI T S � � ti � 1 A� ti J `\ ~'4 DEMING �d / 1 ~1 DE RGUrE STREET �' / w MI�G S 30 SET y� TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 7 / TOWN FUSS &R\r/� 1 �ORO N OEZM M`S`ER.O�ONtut.CUT W / OF r/ tE03)6f6-E.69 t%1 / MANCHESTER / SENIOR HOUSING / SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC / WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR / a � as PROD. NO.- 97146A60 DATE- 10/24/2000 SCALE, N.T.S. � I Rp O` Lq�U30 3 SIT 4buzi 4 ' S 4\ ~ ~4 / a~ DEMING d � DEUTE30 STREET � / �,c;,� G STET / O TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 8 / TOWN 1ALJJ/ jTFV1 S ECU6HARORD ROAD,MANCHETER.CONNTICUTp600 - OF C903) -2469 / MANCHESTER / SENIOR HOUSING / SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC / WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR / d tflas PROJ. NO.: 97146A60 DATE- 10/24/2000 SCALE: N.T.S. �w O ROU Any 30 00 �y RO44 AD SITS39S,y '�49S N p W r0 2 S Zy / 381 c'19 DEMING 43 ^� DE ROUTE 30 STREET / wti / 4 y� TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 9 / TOWN � FUSS & ONEML INGc�� �••rz / OF 7 O 146 HAR FORD ROAD.NANCHESTER.CONNECTICUT 06040 (203)646-2.69 / MANCHESTER / SENIOR HOUSING / 2002 COMBINED CONDITIONS / WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR a 2 a PROJ. NW 97146A60 DATES 10/24/2000 SCALE N.T.S. OAS Ro ��w UTE30 w� `AND ti 69 "mac' S2�.ti 10� )r �► SITSS8g y ~Se6 ZZ S&9 0 'N .v�2 01 `7 a �'`n►,'�L"' i S / \• r 6��ti ~63S So l�► �10 8 DEMING / -. RO STREET �' / / o° EMI1�r 30 TOWN / OF / SOUTH WINDSOR / / FIGURE 10 / TOWN ra,—,N / FUSS & vN � I ER Cct��TM.6HR RO <E0I7nNC646-OF E469 / MANCHESTER / u 2. SENIOR HOUSING / 2002 COMBINED CONDITIONS / WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR / a as PROJ. NO., 97146A60 DATE- 10/24/2000 SCALE, N.T.S. APPENDIX C CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR Map -2002 Background Conditions Levels of Service October 25,2000 4 � ao.o- r #` _..4M> w a e 1?0 o� Z,0 sks Demin 04t�.. E I'I '� T- i, UE MY i Weekday Morning Peak Hour Adult Housing Data Date: 9/5/2000 C:197146\syncro\amback1.sy6 Timing Plan: DJM 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes, Volumes,Timings Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 16 12 Grade (%) 4% 1% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 26 50 26 50 305 50 305 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 -10 0 -10 0 295 0 295 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.882 0.875 0.899 0.894 Fit Protected 0.984 0.962 0.992 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1539 0 0 1560 0 0 1883 0 0 1887 0 Frt Perm. 0.882 0.875 0.899 0.894 Fit Perm. 0.929 0.763 0.854 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1453 0 0 1237 0 0 1621 0 0 1887 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 2 13 1 6 Headway Factor 0.97 1.07 0.97 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Volume(vph) 4 7 2 106 5 25 56 287 2 1 461 22 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 5 8 2 128 6 30 67 346 2 1 555 27 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 15 0 0 164 0 0 415 0 0 583 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 2 Detector Phases 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split(s) 23.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 57.0 57.0 0.0 57.0 57.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 29% 29% 0% 29% 29% 0% 71% 71% 0% 71% 71% 0% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSO'NE-FF41 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings t Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Walk Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 280 1036 1207 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.13 0.26 0.31 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 12.2 12.2 35.7 35.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.59 0.40 0.48 Uniform Delay, dl 14.9 17.9 4.9 5.2 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 3.1 1.2 1.4 Webster Delay 15.0 21.0 6.0 6.6 Webster LOS B C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.9 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 8 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.44 Intersection v/c Ratio:0.49 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 8.5 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 2: Foster St. &Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) j_ o2 � 04 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 6: Route 30 (Oakl Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings --I• "%* f 4-- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt r 1) t I rr Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 2 1 2 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 38 0 22 0 38 32 Trailing Detector(ft) 4 0 16 0 4 2 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 47 211 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 379 42 219 488 36 188 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 426 47 246 548 40 211 Lane Group Flow(vph) 426 47 246 548 40 211 Turn Type Prot Prot Pt+Ov Protected Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Permitted Phases Detector Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0 11.0 Total Split(s) 28.0 28.0 17.0 45.0 40.0 57.0 Total Split(%) 33% 33% 20% 53% 47% 67% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 13.0 41.0 36.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Pagel FUSSONE-FF41 6: Route 30 (Oakland-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings -I-* -- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 932 452 622 1040 381 1452 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.29 0.02 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 9.3 6.4 19.7 7.6 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.18 0.56 0.22 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.10 0.40 0.53 0.10 0.15 Uniform Delay, dl 10.9 0.0 12.7 4.9 11.1 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 Webster Delay 11.2 0.1 13.1 5.4 11.7 0.0 Webster LOS B A B A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length:85 Actuated Cycle Length: 35.3 Natural Cycle:45 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.33 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.37 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 7.5 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 6: Route 30(Oakland Rd.) & Hale Rd. 'Y'li 01 t 03 " M 07 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 Map -2002 Combined Conditions Levels of Service October 25,2000 _ -RIDGEFIELD RO o 3 H _z IJ Q" P .. oRc i 00 lO OR IVE ._BENED ICT..!" ti BENED ICT, Gf�p�O Ilk, (0 � 4e D 9 m W ^R�' ss p� J s 2 — qR s "U 4g ti _Demfn(yy z s — `6Tg 28 `1g ---o / i EJ\�4� BRYAN o OWN.... SN •N �C �N4CE '�� �.i . Q- �E n, `•V / 13 \ ! '__ /�J e sr o ST. / A _sOUT1. �- 1R110N P4_.__ Weekday Morning Peak Hour Adult Housing Data Date: 10/25/2000 C:\97146\syncro\amcomb1.sy6 Timing Plan: DJM 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 10/25/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 16 12 Grade (%) -4% 1% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 26 50 26 50 305 50 305 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 -10 0 -10 0 295 0 295 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.882 0.875 0.899 0.894 Flt Protected 0.984 0.962 0.992 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1539 0 0 1560 0 0 1883 0 0 1887 0 Frt Perm. 0.882 0.875 0.899 0.894 Flt Perm. 0.929 0.763 0.855 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1453 0 0 1237 0 0 1623 0 0 1887 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 2 13 1 7 Headway Factor 0.97 1.07 0.97 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Volume (vph) 4 7 2 107 5 25 56 291 2 1 462 23 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 5 8 2 129 6 30 67 351 2 1 557 28 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 15 0 0 165 0 0 420 0 0 586 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 2 Detector Phases 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split(s) 23.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 57.0 57.0 0.0 57.0 57.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 29% 29% 0% 29% 29% 0% 71% 71% 0% 71% 71% 0% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Pagel FUSSONE-FF41 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 10/25/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings ' Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Walk Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 280 1038 1209 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.13 0.26 0.31 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 12.3 36.0 36.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.59 0.40 0.48 Uniform Delay, dl 15.0 18.1 4.9 5.2 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 3.2 1.2 1.4 Webster Delay 15.1 21.2 6.1 6.6 Webster LOS B C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.3 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 8 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.44 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 8.6 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 2: Foster St. &Route 30(Oakland Rd.) a2 m4 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 6: Route 30 (Oakland-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 10/25/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt r ' t rr Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 2 1 2 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 38 0 22 0 38 32 Trailing Detector(ft) 4 0 16 0 4 2 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 48 211 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 381 43 219 492 37 188 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 428 48 246 553 42 211 Lane Group Flow(vph) 428 48 246 553 42 211 Turn Type Prot Prot Pt+Ov Protected Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Permitted Phases Detector Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0 11.0 Total Split(s) 29.0 29.0 17.0 . 46.0 39.0 56.0 Total Split(%) 34% 34% 20% 54% 46% 66% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 13.0 42.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Max Max None Max None 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSONE-FF41 r. 6: Route 30 (eaklafd-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 10/25/2000 Weekday Morning Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings -10. -f- *-- 4\ Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 17.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1726 797 562 1345 243 1123 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.30 0.02 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 27.7 27.7 9.3 41.0 7.8 20.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.16 0.72 0.14 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.06 0.44 0.41 0.17 0.19 Uniform Delay, dl 8.5 0.0 21.4 3.1 21.6 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.5 0.1 Webster Delay 8.8 0.1 21.9 4.0 23.2 0.1 Webster LOS A A C A C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.8 Natural Cycle:45 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Total Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.32 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.36 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 8.1 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 6: Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) & Hale Rd. 01 o3 '4,* o4 o7 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-171741 I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: bkdmipam Intersection: Deming Street at Imperial Drive Count Date: 2002 Background Conditions Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 1 25 0 0 21 1 1 0 0 3 0 2 HFR: 2 38 0 0 32 2 2 0 0 5 0 3 PHF: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 25 21 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 1 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 'iLength of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------ Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 38 33 Potential Capacity 1039 1046 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1039 1046 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 38 34 Potential Capacity 1585 1591 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1585 1591 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj . L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 75 75 Potential Capacity 819 820 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 818 819 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 76 75 Potential Capacity 918 920 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 915 920 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------ii------------------- v(vph) 2 0 0 5 0 3 Movement Capacity 915 818 1039 920 819 1046 Shared Lane Capacity 915 966 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------� v(vph) 2 2 8 C m(vph) 1591 1585 915 966 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 95% queue length Control Delay 7.3 8.9 8.8 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.9 8.8 Approach LOS A A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 1.00 V i1 25 21 V i2 0 1 S ii 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* 07 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.3 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: MSR - oakdemambg.hcu Intersection: Oakland Rd. (Route 30) at Deming St. Count Date: 2002 Background Conditions Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 390 0 22 493 0 28 HFR: 433 0 24 548 0 31 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y Y N N N N N N hannelized: N rade: 0.00 ane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 493 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 ollow Up Time Calculations: ovement 4 7 9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 by 0.02 0.02 0.02 f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ orksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations tep 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- onflicting Flows 433 otential Capacity 622 edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 ovement Capacity 622 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zonflicting Flows 433 Potential Capacity 1126 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 4ovement Capacity 1126 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 daj . L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1030 Potential Capacity 259 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor, 0.98 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 253 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 it 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------II I I it I I II I v(vph) 0 31 Movement Capacity 253 622 Shared Lane Capacity 622 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1------ ------II I I II I I II I v(vph) 24 31 C m(vph) 1126 622 v/c 0.02 0.05 95% queue length Control Delay 8.3 11.1 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.1 Approach LOS B ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.98 V ii 0 493 V i2 0 0 S i1 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1.00 0.97 D maj left 0.0 8.3 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: cddmipam Intersection: Deming Street at Imperial Drive Count Date: 2002 Combined Conditions Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 1 25 0 0 21 1 1 0 0 3 0 2 HFR: 2 38 0 0 32 2 2 0 0 5 0 3 PHF: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 ane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 25 21 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 1 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t C 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: iMovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 '----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 38 33 Potential Capacity 1039 1046 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1039 1046 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 38 34 Potential Capacity 1585 1591 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1585 1591 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- onflicting Flows 75 75 otential Capacity 819 820 edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 818 819 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 76 75 Potential Capacity 918 920 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 915 920 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------� v(vph) 2 0 0 5 0 3 Movement Capacity 915 818 1039 920 819 1046 Shared Lane Capacity 915 966 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------� v(vph) 2 2 8 C m(vph) 1591 1585 915 966 'v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 959; queue length Control Delay 7.3 8.9 8.8 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.9 8.8 Approach LOS A A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 1.00 v it 25 21 v i2 0 1 S i1 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.3 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: MSR - oakdemamcb.hcu Intersection: Oakland Rd. (Route 30) at Deming St. Count Date: 2002 Combined Conditions Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 395 0 22 495 0 28 HFR: 439 0 24 550 0 31 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: °s Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&G approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 495 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 --------------- t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 439 Potential Capacity 618 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 618 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 439 Potential Capacity 1121 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1121 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.97 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1038 Potential Capacity 256 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 250 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------II I v(vph) 0 31 Movement Capacity 250 618 Shared Lane Capacity 618 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 { ------------------ --------------- ►------ ------------I I II I I II I v(vph) 24 31 C m(vph) 1121 618 v/c 0.02 0.05 9526 queue length Control Delay 8.3 11.1 LOS A g Approach Delay 11.1 Approach LOS g ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 --------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.98 V Z1 0 495 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1.00 0.97 D maj left 0.0 8.3 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: dmsdamcd Intersection: Deming Street (Route 30) at Site Drive Count Date: 2002 Combined Conditions Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 5 418 515 5 3 2 HFR: 6 464 572 6 3 2 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ------------------------------ Flow: Lane width: walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------- Y Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------- Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 418 622 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 575 Potential Capacity 518 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 518 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 578 Potential Capacity 1006 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1006 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1051 Potential Capacity 251 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 250 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------� v(vph) 3 2 Movement Capacity 250 518 Shared Lane Capacity 315 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------� v(vph) 6 6 C m(vph) 1006 315 v/c 0.01 0.02 951 queue length Control Delay 8.6 16.6 LOS A C Approach Delay 16.6 Approach LOS C ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 0.99 1.00 V it 418 622 V i2 0 0 S i1 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 0.99 1.00 D maj left 8.6 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.1 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX D CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Map-2002 Background Conditions Levels of Service rt October 25,2000 Y DR...- ? T Rq v � R x qC?�H rQP - i.� YMO✓ ..._RDgO w F s•' _ CO o o N 's 14e IDT 0�Q aJ cV 6269 ;A N Q p� 3y o De =>.U¢ S83 C/I�� TftE .S.",' ,\ AFCBERTq r�R 4 U of: 42 0 rV V 4; � 2 2• / / o001, ` Az - �/ Ox- / BOUIN :y - BT w N Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour Adult Housing Data Date: 9/5/2000 C:\97146\syncro\pmback1.sy6 Timing Plan: DJM 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings t V% Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations +T+ 4+ Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 16 12 Grade (%) -4% 1% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 26 50 26 50 305 50 305 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 -10 0 -10 0 295 0 295 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.893 0.866 0.898 0.881 Flt Protected 0.984 0.966 0.994 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1558 0 0 1550 0 0 1884 0 0 1860 0 Frt Perm. 0.893 0.866 0.898 0.881 Flt Perm. 0.929 0.787 0.881 0.999 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1471 0 0 1263 0 0 1670 0 0 1858 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 1 18 3 27 Headway Factor 0.97 1.07 0.97 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Volume(vph) 6 11 1 63 4 22 69 524 10 2 499 83 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 1.00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 6 12 1 68 4 24 74 563 11 2 537 89 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 19 0 0 96 0 0 648 0 0 628 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 2 Detector Phases 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split(s) 18.0 18.0 0.0 18.0 18.0 0.0 62.0 62.0 0.0 62.0 62.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 23% 23% 0% 23% 23% 0% 78% 78% 0% 78% 78% 0% Maximum Green (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSONE-FF41 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings t fA �► \4k Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Walk Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 183 172 1293 1444 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.07 0.39 0.34 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 9.7 60.6 60.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.77 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.56 0.50 0.43 Uniform Delay, dl 28.8 26.0 3.2 2.8 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 3.9 1.4 1.0 Webster Delay 29.0 29.9 4.6 3.8 Webster LOS C C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 78.3 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 8 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.46 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 2: Foster St. &Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) m2 o4 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 6: Route 30 (DaJdaPA=Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes, Timings Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt r 11 t '� rr Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 2 1 2 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 22 0 38 32 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 16 0 4 2 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 154 62 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 498 151 1078 481 163 1002 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 508 154 1100 491 166 1022 Lane Group Flow (vph) 508 154 1100 491 166 1022 Turn Type Prot Prot Pt+Ov Protected Phases 4 4 3 7 1 13 Permitted Phases Detector Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0 11.0 Total Split(s) 22.0 22.0 38.0 60.0 25.0 63.0 Total Split(%) 26% 26% 45% 71% 29% 74% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 34.0 56.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Max Max None Max None 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSONE-FF41 6: Route 30 ( nd-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 17.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 776 467 1334 1221 441 1897 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 0.07 0.32 0.26 0.09 0.36 v/s Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 18.4 18.4 32.6 55.0 20.9 56.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.39 0.66 0.25 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.33 0.82 0.40 0.38 0.54 Uniform Delay, d1 29.8 0.0 23.1 6.8 26.1 6.5 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 4.3 1.9 4.3 1.0 2.4 0.3 Webster Delay 34.1 1.9 27.3 7.7 28.5 6.8 Webster LOS C A C A C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 83.9 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Total Lost Time: 13 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.60 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 18.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: 6: Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) &Hale Rd. 01 Oo3 -;i► o4 07 2002 Background Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 Map -2002 Combined Conditions Levels of Service October 25,2000 F o G kkww ROGEFIELD O -- BOW RAyMD'V O O ROAD LF s. Q h 3 3_ iRP" W 1?O Yv ti ro �p Z. NO W Q) D z. DeminqTRE S V _C f eFRra U` �_U; RD / 40__,a - 42 y LJ wo ANT 0 W _HALE I / ST.-0 0 / a __SD T- Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour Adult Housing Data Date: 9/5/2000 C:1971461syncrolpmcomb1.sy6 Timing Plan: DJM 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations 4 4 � Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 16 12 Grade (%) -4% 1% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 26 50 26 50 305 50 305 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 -10 0 -10 0 295 0 295 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.893 0.867 0.898 0.881 Fit Protected 0.984 0.966 0.994 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1558 0 0 1552 0 0 1884 0 0 1860 0 Frt Perm. 0.893 0.867 0.898 0.881 Fit Perm. 0.926 0.781 0.882 0.999 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1466 0 0 1255 0 0 1672 0 0 1858 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 1 18 3 29 Headway Factor 0.97 1.07 0.97 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Volume(vph) 6 11 1 64 4 22 69 527 10 2 501 84 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 6 12 1 69 4 24 74 567 11 2 539 90 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 19 0 0 97 0 0 652 0 0 631 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 2 Detector Phases 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split(s) 17.0 17.0 0.0 17.0 17.0 0.0 63.0 63.0 0.0 63.0 63.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 21% 21% 0% 21% 21% 0% 79% 79% 0% 79% 79% 0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSO`NE-FF41 2: Foster St. & Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings I t � � � *J Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Walk Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 181 170 1296 1446 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.07 0.39 0.34 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 9.6 9.6 60.6 60.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.77 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.57 0.50 0.44 Uniform Delay, dl 28.8 26.1 3.2 2.8 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 4.6 1.4 1.0 Webster Delay 29.1 30.7 4.6 3.8 Webster LOS C C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 78.2 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 8 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.46 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 6.4 Intersection LOS:A Splits and Phases: 2: Foster St. &Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) t o2 +=1 m4 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 G 6: Route 30 (0kkfffd-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft- e �) I P Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 2 1 2 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 38 0 22 0 38 32 Trailing Detector(ft) 4 0 16 0 4 2 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3433 1863 1770 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 155 61 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 501 152 1078 485 164 1002 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 511 155 1100 495 167 1022 Lane Group Flow(vph) 511 155 1100 495 167 1022 Turn Type Prot Prot Pt+Ov Protected Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Permitted Phases Detector Phases 4 4 3 7 1 1 3 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0 11.0 Total Split(s) 22.0 22.0 38.0 60.0 25.0 63.0 Total Split(%) 26% 26% 45% 71% 29% 74% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 34.0 56.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Max Max None Max None 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 1 FUSSOWE-FF41 D2vA;� r >t 6: Route 30 (Oakfand-Rd.) & Hale Rd. 9/5/2000 Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour 10/25/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 1.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 17.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 776 468 1334 1221 441 1897 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 0.07 0.32 0.27 0.09 0.36 v/s Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 18.4 18.4 32.6 55.0 20.9 56.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.39 0.66 0.25 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.33 0.82 0.41 0.38 0.54 Uniform Delay, d1 29.9 0.0 23.1 6.8 26.1 6.5 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 4.3 1.9 4.3 1.0 2.5 0.3 Webster Delay 34.2 1.9 27.3 7.8 28.6 6.8 Webster LOS C A C A C A ' Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 83.9 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Total Lost Time: 13 Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.60 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 18.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: 6: Route 30 (Oakland Rd.) &Hale Rd. 01 o3 , o4 o7 c 2002 Combined Conditions Synchro 4 Report Adult Housing Page 2 FUSSONE-FF41 Step 3: TA from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 132 132 Potential Capacity 763 763 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 760 760 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 132 132 Potential Capacity 844 845 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Adj, Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 841 843 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 --- -8 -- 9 10 11-----12---- ------------------------------------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------- -------------------� v(vph) 3 0 0 3 0 1 Movement Capacity 841 760 1021 843 760 1000 Shared Lane Capacity 841 890 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ------------------- ------ ------------------- -------------------� v(vph) 5 3 4 C m(vph) 1546 1566 841 690 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 95"s queue length Control Delay 7.3 9.3 9.1 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.3 9.1 Approach LOS A A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 1.00 V it 40 52 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.3 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ,Analyst: MSR - oakdempmbg.hcu Intersection: Oakland Rd. (Route 30) at Deming St. Count Date: 2002 Background Conditions Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements:-- ---2---- 3 4 5 7 9 --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 585 0 52 583 0 42 HFR: 650 0 58 648 0 47 �PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: Blockage: Median Type: None �# of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: �# of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 ,Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y Y N N N N N N lChannelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 ------ L------- T R ...... L....... T-------R L T R Y Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N thannelized: N Grade: 0.00 I Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------Eastbound Westbound l-S--a-r-e-d--l- hn volume, major th vehicles: 0 583 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 ,Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: fovement 4 7 9 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 IP by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 it c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St.--------------------------9------ 12 ------------- --------------------------- Conflicting Flows 650 Potential Capacity 469 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 469 Probability of Queue free St. 0.90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 650 Potential Capacity 936 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 936 Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. ---------0.91 --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conflicting Flows 1413 Potential Capacity 152 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 Movement Capacity 141 -------------- --- -- - -- - - --- - -- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations 1 Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v(vph) 0 47 Movement Capacity 141 469 Shared Lane Capacity 469 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------� � v(vph) 58 47 C m(vph) 936 469 V/c 0.06 0.10 95o queue length Control Delay 9.1 13.5 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ' Rank i Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.94 V ii 0 583 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 0.91 D maj left 0.0 9.1 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts ------0.0 0.9 ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N lChannelized: N Grade: 0.00 I Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------Eastbound Westbound IS__a_r_e_dh In volume, major th vehicles: 40 52 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 ,Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. ----- -- - ------- - --9 12 -- ---------- Conflicting Flows 53 68 Potential Capacity 1021 1000 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1021 1000 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 53 68 'Potential Capacity 1566 1546 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1566 1546 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. - -- 1.00 1.00 ------------------------------ --------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 132 132 Potential Capacity 763 763 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 760 760 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l-S-t-e-p-- 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 132 132 Potential Capacity 844 845 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 ICap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 841 843 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations fhared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 -- --9 ----10-- --11 ----12-- - ------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------------- -------------------� iv(vph) 3 0 0 3 0 1 Movement Capacity 841 760 1021 843 760 1000 ,Shared Lane Capacity--- ----- -- --- --841 --- - ---- ---890 ------------------ --------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS 10 Movement --------1------4-------------8------9------------11-----12----- ------------------- ------------- ------------------- -------------------� �v(vph) 5 3 4 C m(vph) 1546 1566 841 890 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 '95% queue length Control Delay 7.3 9.3 9.1 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.3 9.1 Approach LOS ------------------------------------A------- A ------------ --------------------------------------- ,Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 V ii 40 52 IV i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 I D maj left 7.3 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ,Analyst: MSR - oakdempmcb.hcu Intersection: Oakland Rd. (Route 30) at Deming St. Count Date: 2002 Combined Conditions Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements:-------2-- -- 3 5 7 9 -- --4 - -- --------- ------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 589 0 52 586 0 42 1HFR: 654 0 58 651 0 47 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None ,# of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: '# of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 -------L-------T...... R...... L------T- R L T R ---------------------- l Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 'Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N Y N N N N N N ,Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N f Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 586 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 ,Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 'Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: ' 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 't f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 -------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 654 Potential Capacity 466 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 466 Probability of Queue free St. 0.90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,Step 2: LT from Major-St---------------------------4----------------1- --------------- ------------------------- Conflicting Flows 654 (Potential Capacity 933 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 933 Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. ------ - 0.91 --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1421 Potential Capacity 150 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 ,Movement Capacity 139 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 it 12 ,----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I------ ------II I II j lv(vph) 0 47 Movement Capacity 139 466 Shared Lane Capacity 466 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 '----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------II I II I v(vph) 58 147 II I ,C m(vph) 933 466 v/c 0.06 0.10 95% queue length Control Delay 9.1 13.6 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.6 Approach LOS B ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major IT Impedance and Delay 'Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.94 V i1 0 586 V i2 0 0 S ii 1700 1700 'S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 0.91 D maj left 0.0 9.1 N number major st lanes 1 1 Delay, rank 1-mvmts 0.0 0.9 ------------- ---------- --------- -------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ,Analyst: dmsdpmcd Intersection: Deming Street (Route 30) at Site Drive Count Date: 2002 Combined Conditions Time Period: PM Peak Hour 'Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: --1- -- 2 ---5 6 10 12 --------- - ------------------------------------------------ Volume: 4 627 635 5 4 3 111FR: 4 697 706 6 4 3 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: °s Blockage: Median Type: None '# of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: �# of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 'Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 'Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R ---L-------T-------R L T R -------------- N Y Y N N N N N N 'Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 'Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N thannelized: N Grade: 0.00 'Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N Y N N N N N N lChannelized: N Grade: 0.00 I Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 627 622 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 ,Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.02 0.02 't c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: ' 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 ,Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 't f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step -- RT from-Minor-St. ---------------------------9---------------1-- -- ------------------------- Conflicting Flows 708 Potential Capacity 435 'Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 435 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 711 Potential Capacity 898 I Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 898 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 'Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,Step 4: LT from Minor St, 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting FlOws 1414 Potential Capacity 152 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 ,Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0_99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 151 -------------------------------------------------------------------- forksheet -------------------------- 8 Shared Lane Calculations Calculations Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------ v(vph) 4 3 Movement Capacity 151 435 Shared Lane Capacity 209 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------ v(vph) 4 8 'C m(vph) 898 209 v/c 0.00 0.04 95% queue length Control Delay 9.0 22.9 LOS A C Approach Delay 22.9 Approach LOS C ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay 'Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I P Oj 1.00 1.00 V it 627 622 V i2 0 0 S i1 1700 1700 I S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 0.99 1.00 D maj left 9.0 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 1 1Delay, rank-l-mvmns----------------------0.1- 0.0 ---------_ -------------------------------------------------- 1