Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject Files (18) PLANNING DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS 2000 L D 2000 DATE. MARCH 2, 2000 �° W'lii �c;`u_s t .."u $ , TO: TOWN INLAND WETLAND AGENCY FROfU AQUATIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC. SUBJECT: AQUATIC PESTICIDE PERMIT APPLICATION(S) Enclosed for your inforniation is (are) application(s) for permits to apply aquatic pesticides to waterbodies in your town. Although towns do not have unilateral rejection authority, the Pesticide Management Division (PMD) of the Department of . - Environmental Protection is interested in receiving comments on the enclosed application(s). The PMD is particularly interested to learn of any local conditions not specified on the permit, for example, downstream use of the water not indicated, or conservation easements on the pond. Comments should be directed to the Pesticide Management Division, Department of Environmental Protection, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106, or by calling 860-424-3326 Permit Application for the Use of Pesticides in State Waters DEP USE ONLY Please complete this form in accordance with Section 22a-66z CGS and the instructions (DEP-PUMP-INST-200) in order to ensure the proper Appllcatlon No. handling of your application. Print or type unless otherwise noted. -Reed CPPU" Part I: Permit Type and Fee Information Application of Pesticides in State Waters Fee: $ 25.00 Part II: Site Location 1. Name of Waterbody: Vlntons Mill Pond Street address and/or description of location: Ellington Rd. & Rt. 30 City or Town: S. Windsor 2._ GIS/ID No. (If known): 1763 Last Year's Permit#: 99099 Part III: Applicant Information 1. Fill in the applicant's name and phone number as indicated on the Permit Application Transmittal Form (DEP-APP-001) Applicant: Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone(508) 865-1000 2. List primary contact for departmental correspondence and inquiries, if different than the applicant. Name: Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Mailing Address: 11 John Road City/Town: Sutton State: MA Zip Code: 01590 Business Phone: ( 508 ) 865-1000 Ext.. Fax: ( 508 )865-1220 Contact Person: Gerald Smith Title: President 3. List attorney or other representative, if applicable. Firm Name: Mailing Address: City/Town: State: Zip Code: Business Phone: ( ) ext.: Fax: ( ) Contact Person: Title: Vintons Mill Pond Bureau of Waste Management DEP-PUMP-APP-200 1 of 4 Rev 02/05/96 Part II,I: Applicant Information (continued) 4. List the owner(s) of the site(s) to be treated. ❑I Check box if additional sheets are attached. Name: The Mill on the River Mailing Address: 989 Ellington Road City/Town: South Windsor State: CT Zip Code:06071 Business Phone: 203-289-7929 ext.:-Fax: Contact Person: Mr. Helmar Wolf Title: 5. List the person or company applying the pesticides. Name: Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Mailing Address: 11 John Road City/Town: Sutton State: MA Zip Code 01590 Business Phone: (508)865-1000 ext.: Fax: (508) 865-1220 Contact Person: Gerald Smith Title:President Certification Number:S-0762 Part IV: Site Information 1. Is the activity which is the subject of this application located within the coastal boundary as delineated on DEP approved coastal boundary maps? ©Yes r./7 No If yes, you must.submit a Coastal Consistency Review Form (DEP-APP-004) with your application as Attachment C. 2. (Optional- See Instructions) Is the project site located within an area identified as a habitat for endangered, threatened or special concern species as identified on the "State and Federal Listed Species and Natural Communities Map"? 91 Yes ❑ No Date of Map: GIS Datalayer 12/9 If yes, complete and submit the attached Connecticut Natural Diversity Data Base (CT NDDB) Review Request Form to the address specified on the form. When submitting this permit application, please include copies of any correspondence to the NDDB, including copies of the completed CT NDDB.Review Request Form, any field surveys, and any other information which may lead you to believe that endangered or threatened species may or may not be located in the area of your existing or proposed permitted activity, as Attachment D. Has a field survey been conducted to determine the presence of any endangered, threatened or special concern species? 0 Yes ❑ No If yes, provide: Biologist's Name- Address: and submit a copy of the field survey with your application as Attachment D. 3. Type of area to be treated: ❑Tidal Waters ❑ Pond or Lake ❑Stream 4. Name and number of-dfainagejaasffin (of known) 4004 Podnuck River Vintons Mill Pond Bureau of Waste Management DEP-PUMP-APP-200 2 of 4 Rev. 02/06/96 Part Iy: Site Information (continued) 5. Is the waterbody located in a public water supply watershed? ❑Yes 91 No 6. Where does the waterbody flow to? Pleasant River Is the outflow usually flowing? ❑ Yes ❑ No Can outflow be stopped? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Identify the size of the waterbody- NA NA Length (ft.) N'4 Width (ft.) 21'6 Acres Maximum Depth (ft.) 8 Average Depth (ft.) 4 Volume (Ac-ft) 86.4 8. Portion of the waterbody to be treated: 21.6 Acres 86.4 Volume (Ac-ft.) 9. Does the waterbody have public access? 0 Yes ❑ No 10. Is the waterbody stocked with fish by the state? F� Yes ❑ No 11. Identify use(s) of waterbody: d domestic water supply ❑ irrigation ❑ watering livestock ❑ swimming ❑ fishing 12. Are there any downstream users of the water who may be affected by treatment? E3 Yes ❑ No If yes, please explain: 13. Within 1/2 mile of the treatment area, are there any drinking water welts 50 ft. or less from the shoreline? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. Identify all organisms to be controlled: coontail, duckweed, filamentous algae 15. Identify all types of fish present: bass, bullhead, carp 16. Identify chemicals to be used and the amount per treatment: a) Aquathol-K 84 gal 1 b) Reward 10 gal 1 c) Copper Sulfate 60 lbs. 3 treatments requested 17. Projected date(s) of pesticide use: 5/00,6/00,8/00 18. List prior years in which chemicals were applied to the this waterbody: 91-97,99 Vintons Mill Pond Bureau of Waste Management DEP-PUMP-APP-200 3 of 4 Rev. 02/05/96 Part•V: Supporting Documents Be sure to read the instructions (DEP-PUMP-INST-200) to determine whether the attachments listed are applicable to your specific activity. Please enter a check mark by the attachments as verification that all applicable attachments have been submitted with this permit application form. When submitting any supporting documents, please label the documents as indicated in this Part (e.g., Attachment A, etc.) and be sure to include the applicant's name as indicated on the Permit Application Transmittal Form. 8 Attachment A: An 8-1/2" x 11" copy or original of a USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map (scale 1:24,000) indicating the exact location of the area to be treated. Attachment B: Applicant Compliance Information Form (DEP-APP-002), (if applicable) Attachment C: Coastal Consistency Review Form (DEP-APP-004) (if applicable) ❑ Attachment D: Connecticut NDDB Review Request Form (DEP-APP-007) and copies of any correspondence to the NDDB, including copies of any field survey conducted to identify the presence of any endangered, threatened or special concern species (if applicable) Part VI: Application Certification The applicant and the individual(s) responsible for actually preparing the application must sign this part. An application will be considered insufficient unless all required signatures are provided. I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all attachments thereto, and I certify that based on reasonable investigation, including my inquiry of the individuals responsible for obtaining the information, the submitted information is true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that a false statement in the submitted information may be punishable as a criminal offense, in accordance with Section 22a-6 of the Connecticut General Statutes, pursuant to Section 53a-157b of the Connecticut General Statutes, and in accordance with any other applicable statute. v l . .6 F— 2/24/00 Signature of Applicant Date Aquatic Contol Technology, Inc Gerald N.Smith President Name of Applicant (print or type) Title (if applicable) qMWw+t.�l 2/24/00 Signature of Preparer Date Dominic Meringolo Bioengineer Name of Preparer (print or type) Title (if applicable) ❑ Please enter a check mark if additional signatures are necessary. If so, please reproduce this sheet and attach signed copies to this sheet. Note: Please send one copy of your completed application along with the required cover letter (see attached) to the appropriate local inland wetland agency. Bureau of Waste Management DEP-PUMP-APP-200 4 of 4 Rev. 02/05/96 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NATURAL RESOURCES CENTER 79 Elm Street, Store Level Hartford,CT 06106 Natural Diversity Data Base March 12, 1999 Dominic Meringolo Aquatic Control Technology 11 John Road Sutton,MA 01590 re: Proposed chemical treatment of aquatic vegetation in Vintons Mill Pond in South Windsor,Connecticut Dear Ms. Betio: 1 have reviewed Natural Diversity Data Base maps and files regarding the area delineated on the map you provided for the proposed chemical treatment of aquatic vegetation in Vintons Mill Pond in South Windsor,Connecticut. According to our information,there are known extant populations of Federal and State Endangered Alasmidonta heterodon(dwarf wedge mussel)in the vicinity of this project. I have sent your letter to Julie Victoria(DEP-Wildlife)for further review. Natural Diversity Data Base information includes all information regarding critical biological resources available to Its at the time of the request. This information is a compilation of data collected over the years by the Natural Resources Center's Geological and Natural History Survey and cooperating units of DEP, private conservation groups and the scientific community.- This information is not necessarily the result of comprehensive or site-specific field investigations. Consultations with the Data Base should not be substitutes for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments. Current research projects and new contributors continue to identify additional populations of species and locations of habitats of concern,as well as,enhance existing data. Such new information is incorporated into the Data Base as it becomes available. Please contact me if you have further questions at 424-3592. Thank you for consulting the Natural Diversity Data Base. Also be advised that this is a preliminary review and not a final determination. A more detailed review may be conducted as part of any subsequent environmental permit applications submitted to DEP for the proposed site. Sincerely, Dawn M. McKay Biologist/Environmental Analyst CC: J[IIW Vicloria hldy Sinker (Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 http://dep.state.ct.us An Equal Opportunity Employer STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1 FRANKLIN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA � 391 ROUTE 32 ` '°• �c,r NORTH FRANKLIN, CT 06254 TELEPHONE: (860) 642-7239 March 26, 1999 Mr. Dominic Meringolo Aquatic Control Technology 11 John Road Sutton, MA 01590 Re: Proposed chemical treatment of aquatic vegetation in Vintons Mill Pond, South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Meringolo: Your request for information was forwarded to me on 3/24/99 by Dawn McKay of the Department of Enivironmental Protection's (DEP) Natural Diversity Database. Their records indicate that dwarf wedge mussels (Alasmidonta heterodon),which are federally and state endangered have a localized population in the Podunk River within the vicinity of this project. These freshwater invertebrates are very susceptible to degradation in water quality. Activities that degrade the water quality, particularly the dissolved oxygen and dissolved salts, will affect these species. ' F I have contacted the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Regional Field Office about this project and the possible detrimental affects to dwarf wedge mussels. USFWS endangered species biologist Susi vonOttingen's specific questions were: 1)what herbicides/algeacides will be used? 2)what will be the dilution factor by the time the chemical reaches the Podunk River? Please be advised that formal consultation with the USFWS may be required to avoid adverse effects to dwarf wedge mussels. Formal consultation with the USFWS, as described under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, is a process by which the Service determines whether the adverse effect is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a species or cause "take". The Wildlife Division has not made an on-site inspection of the project area. The Division requests details of the proposed project and a timetable of the work to be done. Consultation with the Wildlife Division should not be substituted for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Julie Victoria Wildlife Biologist Cc: D. McKay J. Singer S.vonOetingen An Equal Opportunity Employer Figure k: .. USGS Quadrangle Map:p. dun •���k� cr . Map Scale: — 0 2-1Y, 1 Center of aquatic application area r� •s.•. v •II „e% .•.�•�-- \vl/'� ... W "\.`,:v: .• 'l�`I '►o ��,/'' R OAD 77 _-�.� �' SITE �u )C,,) Y. ��r,✓i•CF-4 \•�.,(i��: �•�,{5��•'/'.' (l: ;>' oe"Q.�.�• i (1, ,r��� �,�; , �/ ff1 V �,1•�7 _ ice, �-jti� // ��ll if• .�. �\ 1 �E � �E•+Y+1/.fs �G I /-► \ --.�y .Ir•. \('.\.� 7ud '1 ll\)'`J(�•1 r�l l�t ,J.illl�555 ) :.1 vly '�^��� r .la 11 S Vas :�- �,. f .?/ 'F il c•.a• I,,:• ` ) `/e' ( ` 1 /���"'=r' of ''' •1 (,, •;�a. �`' )• !-•° � \, • !� n1 i ✓ E Q•.�l�r)1 � !J,, rig. :�i'.�.��--� — .i S 1 ,y�./�• ,. ���i ems) �•'`� ;/�J• �31,�--�• ��� I°o /` $';''' \ :r' J1 (c.' `,,.,' I' -I1'' yt'1 ifs;• I —,,� '�OII' � 7 •A;- �1, '•r �1 � �I J'�:•/ ,�C�'.r� \'/i 1,i�• ...."Tm�,•�•yr I. A 1 J• � ,v � :. ate- �' e ,y PC �'• ... -'p• ,. � •)'., •�'• — ..... /I � is It E7UI NA " +1 r i • •'ll• .j. ,•�• q, •t N •.� �• '`-i' tri {�\:�n.rr Ir // Al 1„ 1 �l: !:� Ir�J lr.:yY• �tprlN Sf,t� P 9 ` Tawn ale SotdA Vt 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR•00 AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 April 4, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. &Mrs. Desormier 55 Fitch Meadow Lane South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Request for 36 sq. ft. addition, 55 Fitch Meadow Lane,Fitch Meadow Designed Residence Development Dear Mr. &Mrs. Desormier: At its March 28, 2000,meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve your request for a waiver to Section 4.5.4.a of the Zoning Regulations. The maximum unit size for your house is now 1492 sq. ft. If you have any questions,please call the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning&Zoning Commission WJM/dlw cc: Building Department i O ss ��h �ryseA� d� "�ur�l, aa, aoQa 'Lim�. d f1nmen.-rn07 L eaknn ,PI � Un �U �mnz • P°^ ouA. k1,a ow_� bg.1� fAe�..�N aoorz�R i4 � .a➢Suiu iui a. vwI �. Pima4� a�'d�trsn di Vol �gfi(P2 0- A I. (+.na)rn� �il 0n u4, i1 u� �➢ rn�mtRa uw� d4P +� f - i CD ------------- �.... .... - - - 1t i�' a."/ '• STEPHENT.CASSANO,MAYOR 7o wn o �ancliester { JOSH M.HOWROYD,DEPUTY MAYOR JOSEPH D.NEGRI,SECRETARY 41 Center Street•P.O. Box 191 DIRECTORS j 5 ; TIMOTHY H.BECKER Sri c ster, Connecticut 06045-0191 THOMAS P.CROCKETT EDWARD HACHADOUR/AN SUSAN HOVEY JAMES E.MORANCEY R/CHARD J.SARTOR,GENERAL ME O CERTIFIED MAIL (RRR) GOUIS A.SPADACC/Nl May 1, 2000 Ms. Gretchen E. Bickford, Town Clerk Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Notification of Application Received by the Town of Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Ms. Bickford: The Town of Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission hereby notifies the Town Clerk for the Town of South Windsor by certified mail of the following pending application: HOME DEPOT U.S.A.. INC. - 80 Buckland Hills Drive - CUD Final Plan Modification (H-138) - The applicant requests approval of a modification to a final plan in the Comprehensive Urban Development zone to allow construction of an outdoor storage rack to the south end of the existing building. The application is available for review with this office at the Lincoln Center building, 494 Main Street, 2°d floor, and may be viewed by the public Monday through Friday - 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. If you should have any questions or wish to obtain a copy of the plans, please contact the Town of Manchester Planning Department at 647-3044. , Sincerely, 4ey Pike Diant AICP Planner LPD:ka cc: Ms. Marcia Banach, Town Planner R:\SHARON09\CERTS\S-Windsor.Town Clerk.wpd An Equal Opportunity Employer Town of South Windsor, ConnecticutY r 1540 Sullivan Ave. �� l`���J� South Windsor, Ct. 06074 < To whom it may concern: I am a ninth grade student at Manchester High School. I am doing a project for my earth science class, the problem of my project is; "Is the over development at the mall area a hazard to the community and it's surroundings?" The reason why I am writing to you is because, I would like to know why your town did not want to be apart of the mall's building project in 1963? My group and I would appreciate it if you would write back with the answer to that question. Also, does your town regret now not wanting to be apart of that project? Daniell Savage 482 W. Middle Turnpike Ut. 34 Manchester, Ct. 06040 Sincerely, Daniell Savage 7C Thank you very much for your help! 111r-0- _ s �r tO•N N 8f,t u o Town apsou& Vt s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 •c AREA CODE 860/644-2511 June 8, 20000 Hal Cummings, Esq. Cummings &Lanza,L.L.C. 1610 Ellington Rd. P.O. Box 667 South Windsor, CT 06074-0667 Re: Request by Route 5 Motor Cars Inc. for Authorization for Wholesale&Retail Sales of Operable Cars Dear Attorney Cummings: We regret to inform you that at its May 23,2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to deny your client's request for the approval of wholesale and retail sale of cars at 1429 John Fitch Boulevard. Industrial zone. The Commission is concerned with the proliferation of used car sales facilities on John Fitch Boulevard. Sincerely, k/%,; Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WAVdlw 0100 76 70 .. ?2 •*io t fir: ... , ..\ \,,�,.. �L �.. Ile N t r 16 05-10 W 000IV x ;: Ng 0 . 16T4 \ M1Et�AN. E 50t REAR 'YARD E 1 SMALL r a • ,gyp 62 W — / LOT 3 O `' ,•. .: . 1 Q a".�\�:. IQ y AREA/70,029 SD. FT., o /ol N V 60 Re 0 ck.OF M Fp 0 0l 62 ARS t o M I_ as ao f N N Noss C O p Y T cV' 50 FRONT YARD I > PROPOSED ) a: �? II Q7 a as Qh 80 W via �O��� 5 55•-27'-10 164.62t �� I .r�.. — 157.00� R 1 "' Q ' . , ,;�yt'.• .,,�.••.• $ S '-IS-3�E 228. 33' Co NC IVEwAY vosT �_-� ot LAW OFFICES CUMMINGS AND LANZA,L.L.C.1610 ELLINGTON ROAD POST OFFICE BOX 667RtClEIVED SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074-0667 m Q l 4 '10 (8")644-3473 in FAX(860)644-3347 �'i�IIEHN HAROLD R.CUMMINGS ,` MICHAELJ.LANZA ll 11 '+"� "� OFCOUNSEL VINCENTJ.PURNHAGEN 6 May 4,2000 Mr. Walter Mealy,Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,Ct. 06074 Re: Request by Route 5 Motor Cars Inc. for Authorization for Wholesale and Retail Sales of Operable Passenger Vehicles at premises— 1429 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, Connecticut,pursuant to Section 6.1.2.7 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations Dear Chairman Mealy: I represent Route 5 Motor Cars Inc. For over twenty-five(25)years,Route 5 Motor Cars Inc. has been engaged in the sale of used passenger automobiles(primarily wholesale with some retail)at its present location at 713 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor,Connecticut. For various reasons,my client needs to relocate its business. My client has entered into a contract to purchase 1429 John Fitch Boulevard. 1429 John Fitch Boulevard is located in the Industrial zone. The South Windsor Zoning regulations, allow, in the industrial zone: "Storage of operable passenger motor vehicles(operable being defined as qualifying for State of Connecticut motor vehicle registration), provided, however,that no sales or servicing of such vehicles is conducted on the premises." In order to operate its business at the 1429 John Fitch Boulevard location,however,my client needs the ability to sell and service vehicles on the premises. 1429 John Fitch Boulevard meets the criteria set forth in Section 6.1.3 of the zoning regulations as an appropriate site for the wholesale and retail sale of passenger automobiles. My client would like to continue its business in South Windsor. Your favorable consideration of this request will make that possible. Sinc y4CmIggs, ar I R Att ey for Route 5 Motor Cars Inc. Sab cc. Louis Treglia p.NN SfS<� c � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ,sox•C0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 8, 1981 Harold R. Cummings, Esq. 1665 Ellington Road South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear Hal: Re: App. #822 - Louis Treglia Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted last night to approve the above application for an amendment to Section 4.7.2.8 of the Zoning Regulations, by adding (k) as follows: (k) Storage of operable passenger motor vehicles (operable being defined as qualifying for State of Connecticut motor vehicle registration), provided, however, that no sales or servicing of such vehicles is conducted on the premises. Yours very truly, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION By: c arshall Montana, Chairperson vg CC; Mr. DeMallie, Director of Planning Mr. J. Page, Town Engineer Mr. T. D'Auria, Building Official Commissioners MAY• 04 '00 e 1:57PM DOW&CONDON COLLIER--_eftm."m„m. m P.2/9 '� . •. _: . • . .• o' Nam.-i• :ptzopoca� ��0�t�o�] G %.11.3E L,11Jq. E`tt5tujG.. 11�.0�NG Poo .., w 99 a • �Zy 5�zq.�5, . -FbiL• -7to� 7tA Fait s�RQQ SSS a �� - r3�•�©� o o oft a IIJ . • ��.s.� S0�a1 tv t NO SG Q Ga i�N. • L NOS:..�,►.41 � _ 3.05 Ac. 0 0 O - - 460'S M ` 480 S d' N .,. 13 b.7 8 Ac. , Pre, ,. . 480.0, • O �o 26p.p � o ' N 1.50 Ac. _ F 5.91 Ac. c i v CV t 3. i 26pf 1 LL N 10 17.15 Ac. 6i6'd S63I-nOD NOQNOAMOQ Wd6S:TO 00, b0 AdW I 10 f T-0� ale saw 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH VANDSOR,CT 06074.2786 ~OSOR-co`'c� AREA CODE 860/644.2511 FAX 860/644-3781 OFFICE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL May 2, 2000 Mr. Walter Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear Mr. Mealy: At its Regular Meeting of May 1, 2000, the South Windsor Town Council approved the following Resolution: WHEREAS, J. E. Shepard Company has requested that the portion of Bidwell Road where it enters the property of J. E. Shepard Company, which is leased to ONSI at 100 Bidwell Road, be discontinued; and WHEREAS, J. E. Shepard Company will enter into an agreement to maintain this portion of roadway if it is discontinued by the Town; and WHEREAS, the South Windsor Traffic Commission has found that the discontinuance of this portion of roadway will not create traffic or safety problems; and WHEREAS, any plan to discontinue a portion of the roadway must first be submitted to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission for a report pursuant to Section 8-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes (Resolution Continued on Next Page) Mr. Walter Mealy, Chair, P&Z Re: Resolution Regarding Bidwell Road - Partial Closing Page 2 May 2, 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plan to discontinue that portion of Bidwell Road that leads from the main portion of Bidwell Road to ONSI's location at 100 Bidwell Road be submitted to the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission for a report pursuant to Section 8-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Respectfully submitted, Patricia R. Brown Clerk of the Council Cc: Matthew B. Galligan, Town Manager Marcia Banach, Director of Planning✓ Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works O S F NOSOR•CO JW CIO 9 ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Soe•co AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 June 12,2000 Town Council Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: CGS 8-24 Referral, Discontinuance of a portion of Bidwell Road Dear Mayor Lassman Fisher: At its May 23, 2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to endorse the Town Council's Resolution regarding the discontinuance of a portion Bidwell Road. The Commission notes that the proposed discontinuance is in conformance with an approval condition imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon an application for expansion of ONSI at 100 Bidwell Rd. The Commission appreciates the Council's cooperation in implementing this approval condition. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WD&dlw LAW OFFICES ' ECEIVE- D CUMMINGS LANZA AND PURNHAGEN L.L.C. 1610 ELLINGTON ROAD MAY D , 2040 POST OFFICE BOX 667 1 SOUTH WINDSOR,CONN.06074-0667 q (860)644-3473 e t FAX(860)644-3347 HAROLD R.CUMMINGS EDWARD R.KUEHN MICHAEL J.LANZA OF COUNSEL VINCENT J.PURNHAGEN May 25, 2000 Walter Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Request by Route 5 Motor Cars,Inc. for Authorization for Storage & Wholesale Sales of Operable Passenger Vehicles at Premises— 1429 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, CT,pursuant to Section 6.1.2.7 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations Dear Chairman Mealy: On behalf of my client, Route 5 Motor Cars, Inc., I would appreciate your placing, on the next agenda of the Planning and Zoning Commission, consideration of a revised request for 1429 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor. My client wishes to modify the request made at the presentation on May 16, 2000,by deleting any reference to retail sales. My client's request is, therefore: for the storage of operable passenger vehicles for wholesale sales only. The only accessory use on the premises would be a general repair permit for the repair and servicing of the vehicles, as necessary to the wholesale sales business. There will be no retail sales conducted on the premises. My client will maintain an office in the building on the premises for the conduct of his business. I believe the above proposed use is substantially identical to the use which the Planning and Zoning Commission approved for the fleet car business on Jeffrey Drive. Again,I would appreciate your scheduling discussion on this revised proposal at the earliest possible opportunity. Sincerely S, of . Cummi s HRC:cj C: Client Donald Kiah, Colliers, Dow& Condon L: 3 t$' . • MAY 04•;00 e1:57PM DOW&CONDON COLLIER}mm.■momm ,e m q P.2/9 --� ��V/,l /rl oil . • ,. - �1S tiQZ c o - o 5&zq.4&s _ Ms. 410 to 1s SovT� w rr.��'SoQ CoIJ#j i v F it`s 4� aaa,s 14 �k 3.05 Ac. 19 d — 5 r . • oo t h O 4601 1 60 P N 0.78 Ac. O b 2g0.0 o " 12 . t 1 N 1.50 Ac. 5.91 Ac. a' 3. 260' { � B s3�.48, � c 10 17.15Ac :1�041 I 6i6'd Sd3I-nOD NOQNODSMOa Wd6S:Tb 00, b0 AdW I r �tpWN SE,tTown aps-otdA Vt G = s G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe-co 4; AREA CODE 860/644-2511 June 25, 2000 Harold R. Cummings,Esquire Cummings, Lanza and Purnhagen,L.L.C. 1610 Ellington Road P.O. Box 667 South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Request by Route 5 Motors Cars, Inc. for authorization for storage&wholesale sales of operable passenger vehicles Dear Attorney Cummings: We are pleased to inform you that at its June 20, 2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed by consensus to approve as a permitted use your request for Route 5 Motor Cars, Inc. to store and sell wholesale operable passenger vehicles at 1429 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, CT. This approval is contingent upon submission and approval of a site plan of development in accordance with Section 8 of the Zoning Regulations. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlw REV.ROLF A.BUCHMANN REV.RANDALL L.PEKARI 20 Aroda Drive 29 Diane Drive South Windsor,CT.06074 Vernon,CT.06066 Tel.860-644-3221 Tel.860-643-4390 fun .5"&n 239 Cymlsa,,, ,Woad — .gow4 Zf mdQon, 6'7 W7Rt 960-644-3350 May 30, 2000 Mr. Walter Mealy Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mealy: Our Savior Lutheran Church has been approached by an organization called the"Good News Garage"to provide temporary parking for cars donated for their program. The request is for parking for 3 -4 cars for about three weeks, after which they would be picked up and delivered to the"Good News Garage in Bur ington, VT. We wish to help them out in this way; naturally, we want to be in compliance with the regulations of the Town of South Windsor before giving them an answer. Enclosed is a brochure for your information. Please let us know if we can provide you with any further information needed for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Yo ly, Pastor rolf A. Buchmann Church Fax:860-644-9068 e-mail:our.savior.lutheran@snet.net http://www.otirsavior.org Preschool and Child Care 860-644-6458 Good NewsG A R A G E � = e e A program of Lutheran Social Serves of New England Is YOUR CAI? T OOKM49" FOR A NEW HaA4E.�' Would you like to help a struggling neighbor- get oe keep a job? Could you use a healthy tax deduction? Fwneighbor tax-deductible donation of a used vehicle to the Good News Gara e. Not only get a break, you'll give an even b1mer break -- one with four wheels ---- to a in need. TranSformill Lives The Good News Garage, a program of Lutheran Social Services of New England, offers an inno- vative solution for people who find the lack of affordable, dependable transportation a major stumbling block to employment. We seek tax-deductible donations of used vehicles ideally less than 10 years old. We repair them, and pass them on to love-income recipients. Without a car these people would either lose their job, be unable to accept a job, or be denied access to employment training. Vehicle donors gain a tax deduction, while offering an economic jumpstart to someone striving to become self-sufficient, Call Toil Free: 1-877-GIVE AUTO (877-448-3288) Good News Garage One ruin Street, Burlington, `VIT 05401 Gnewsg2together.net www.goodnewsgarage.orig getting lives rolling again! ���►N so 1g'� 5 � Based in Burlington, VT,the Good News Garage has a satellite site in Sturbridge,MA,and is working on expanding into Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island. H n We accept donated cars from all over New England. Lutheran Home of Southbury,CT remains a local drop-off point �4 for Fairfield and New Haven Counties. Town oPs-oar ?AndAiat 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 S AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 OR•CO� June 27, 2000 Pastor Rolf A. Buchmann Our Savior Lutheran Church 239 Graham Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Pastor Buchmann: We regret to inform you that at its June 20, 2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied your request to provide the temporary parking of donated cars for the"Good News Garage"program at 239 Graham Rd. South Windsor. The commission felt this was not an appropriate use for this area and suggested that the Church seek an alternative location for the cars to be stored(such as at an established car sales or repair facility). If you have any questions,please call the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlw l s= RECEIV � r MAY 1 s fto PEACHBROOKE ASSOCIATION INC. �����°� �t��u�: P. O. BOX 542 SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 May 18,2000 Town of South Windsor Building Department 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: School Bus Shelter To Whom It May Concern: Peachbrooke Association is a Planned Urban Development Community located off Sullivan Ave. in the Town of South Windsor. The Peachbrooke community was developed with a School Bus Shelter as part of the common property located near the entrance to the development. The school bus stops on Sullivan Ave. approximately one hundred feet from the location of the shelter making it essentially useless to the resident's children. At the recent Annual Meeting residents in the vicinity of the shelter have requested the removal of the shelter. The reasons they presented in support of the removal were the lack of use and the obstruction of their view when backing out of their driveways. The Peachbrooke Board of Directors has two questions that must be answered before any action can be taken to resolve the issue. First, is it a requirement for a Planned Urban Development to have a school bus shelter? Secondly, if it is required, can it be moved to a more convenient location within the development? Your response to these questions would be appreciated and allow us to provide a resolution to the issue. Sri ' ce e , Sohn L. O'Connell,President Peachbrooke Assoc., Board of Directors Town oP Soab� VtAdAiot 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • .SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �Gyosoe co� .AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 July 5,2000 Mr.John L. O'Connell,President Peachbrooke Assoc.Board of Directors P. O. Box 542 q South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. O'Connell: RE: BUS SHELTER AT PEACHBROOKE The Planning Department received your letter regarding the location of the existing bus shelter. The bus shelter is required under the zoning regulations governing Peachbrooke's type of development (Designed Residence). However, the location is specified as "a location convenient to the residents and readily serviceable by the passenger transportation operator." Thus, the shelter can be relocated to a more convenient location. If the Board does decide to move the bus shelter,please sketch out the proposed location on a copy of the site plan for our review and approval prior to moving the structure. If your proposed location would encroach into the right-of-way for Sullivan Avenue, State Dept. of Transportation approval would also be needed. If the Board does not have a copy of the approved site plan, one can be obtained here at Town Hall.Please do not hesitate to contact me at 644-2511, ext.253, if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Marcia A.Banach,AICP Director of Planning MB/sf JUL-17-2000 14:39 RGD 203 746 5715 P.02iO4 C4pitol legion Council Of Grovernne0:�s, 241 Main Street • Dartford • Connecticut • 06106 le Telephone(8Q) 522-2217•Fax (660) 724-1274 www.crcog.0-ta l Stephen T. Cassano, CW nm•'' July 14,2000 Richard J.Portk Executive Director , MEMBERS PLANNING ANT)ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ON ZONING,REFERRAL Andover Town of Manchester 2000/98 Avon COMMISSIONERS: Bolton " Bloomfield Receipt is acknowledged of the above-mcationed referral. Notice of this proposal was transmitted Canton thePlannin Division of the Capitol Region n Council of Governments under the provisions of SectrOd.Fr» 3(b)of the Connecticut General Statutes,as amended. East Granby , East,Hartfiord This referral involves proposed readoption of a zone change for properties on Deming and Avery East Windsor Streets. Residence A;Br8;B-III;&B-V to the new SDC Zone. Ellington Caniamgnt; The staff of the Regional Planning Commission of the Capitol Region Council of ; Enfield Governments has reviewed this referral and finds no apparent conflict with regional plans and policies or the concerns of neighboring towns. Farmington Glastonbury The rezoning of these parcels to Special Design District was fiixt proposed in April 1999.The Granby rezoning was rendered invalid bedaus�the regulation had not been in effect at the time;thus,the Town is resubmitting in order to.validate the previous zone change.On May 11,'1999, Stiff issued Hartford a comment that indicated no apparent conflict with regional plans and policies or the concerns of Hebron neighboring towns,The comment also noted: "This proposed amendment may reduce the impacts Manchester of existing commercial zoning in Manchester on adjacent residential districts in the community of South Windsor."This comment is still relevant to the proposed rezoning. .Marlborough .Newington Questions concerning this,referral should be directed to Karen Berchtold. Rocky Hill In accordance with our procedures this letter will,constitute final CRCOG action on this referral. The Simsbury public hearing date has been scheduled for July 17,2000. Somers DISTRIBUTION: South Windsor planner' Mancheter,East Hartford,South Windsor Respectfully submitted, Suffield Vernon,Bolton,Glastonbury Linda Keith,Chairman Tolland Vernon Anthony DiLorenzo,Vice Chaittnau- t West Hartford Regional Plann/i�ng Commissi Wethersfield Windsor Laetol d Wm&or Locks Community Development planner,' A voluntary Council of Governments formed to initiate,and lenext regional firograms of oeneit to the toms and the regros ' h ear j RANCO COLLISION ISION REPAIR 105 Edwin Road South Windsor, CT 06074 (860) 528-5298 Town of South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 To whom it may concern: We have been in the Collision Repair business in South Windsor since 1993 and are looking to build a new facility on lot#5 Commerce Way. This will enable us to better serve our customers by making our facility grow from its current size of 2,500 square feet to our proposed size of 5,000 square feet. The new facility will enable us to grow and do business in a modern, state of the art location. It will also improve our relationship with insurance companies. We enjoy being a part of the South Windsor business community and look forward to continuing this relationship. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Andrew J. Hewitt � o & W Seater eawdructian eompavpf, 9W. 75 COMMERCE WAY SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 06074 TEL: 528-5252 August 1, 2000 Planning g&Zoning Commission Town Of South Windsor Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 RE: Agenda-Tuesday,August 1,2000 NEW BUSINESS: Item 4. Ranco Collision Repair To the Commission; As one of the first owners and occupants at the John Fitch Business Centre we have watched the area grow to what it is now. There are quite a verity of enterprises operating together successfully and I believe that Ranco Collision Repair is compatible with those uses and welcome it to the Centre. Since this facility is proposed for the lot directly across the street from our business the only concern I have is for the proper screening of exterior storage. incerely, dG�v James H. Slater,President RECEIVED AUG �9 2000 August 26, 2000 Walter Mealy, Chairman South Windsor Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Proposed Stop&Shop Super Store Dear Mr. Mealy: My wife and I moved to South Windsor from Manchester 12 years ago to get away from poorly conceived commercial development which is what is proposed for Town Center as aptly described in Mr. Bruce Burnham's 8/24/00 letter to the editor at the Journal Inquirer(article enclosed). We are not against a Stop& Shop coming into town but feel strongly that this project is not suited for the proposed site. We trust that you will share this letter with the other commission members and do everything in your power to keep the Town Center quaint and void of a Super Stop& Shop. Sincerely, sed Robert J.McCarthy Carol B.McCarthy 2608 Mill Pond Drive South Windsor, CT p Encl. � P 2�- -EDITORIALS&COMMENT LETTERS 70 ;THE EDITQR --into an income-generating source, might`be appropriate for Kelly and. but rather to prevent its develop- Stop & Shop to build in half our went and preservu its tine .Town Center,. say 40,000" square - nature, y-help' ilize _feet._ That'.would not take over,. `The ;towh ;aumed. dovs+n this the,tax base. j _,monster stoic at the.corner of Dem g the cost'of displace, and overwhelm.our new Bucklaad last yesr.::Why;• motional-t rvices over,the Town Center. It would be'attrac- g long to ' L f that, the tive, a positive addition: But will would we now`want this 90,000 anio rent sho reduced; the":�0,000 square=foot superstore squarerfoot :big-bole commercial c rably as.well. with, a. .•florist, _general store, inarket;.smack iII the noddle of our' hardware;photo, cleaners,:market, new fledgling Town Center?It will; Knthy'Anderson harmac. , etc:, crush_ .our small Aestray,what we.have so`cawfiilly_ - B°�GD� P Y' local "stores..that. Have served us started.-Our Town Center, a sources faithfully over We"years Will:the of pride, -Joy,,memories, and ap- What price development? 9Wpound-gorilla"-dove the small preciat on,will be dead. And.what. Stop&Shop Inc:has an applies- stores out of business-or make them will, happen 10 or .15 years from. don before -the. South_-;Windsor unprofitable?The Wal-Mart effect. now-._when our town reaches, a Planning and Zoning Commission Competition--_is.,supposed: to be population of 50,000 people-and an fora 77,000-square-Foot super store healthy,bnt what small family store even . larger super-huge .market' at' Town Center;- (fora comers can complete when. the monster wants to come-to---town? across:from the-white church).-The store-comes calling? Do we wally or Stop & Shdp' decides, to concern of a number of-residents is need it?-We all'live.10 minutes move th .a- larger. spot, .down -that..a store this ,size .will over- Hard a _supermarket right- now. Sullivan Avenge where they belong whelm our new Town Center.hV oire Hard timed for our small businesses in the first place The Town Center. than 500-parking spaces;will be ~.is not progress: wilythen l abandoned wtth_a non needed. Tfie,store swill be open, . This will not bean"easy decision compete la se for the site, and hoi►rs a day: for our PZC Everyone likes conve- int could mence But at what price?Why kill S,ou W1IIOr at that Obviousl a sa our`;.new Town Center with a be left with a paper;strewn, vyeed, Y permarket. near infested massive empty parkin$lol '. the center 'of town would be a megastore so soon :after.its birth? at Drat `Down Center beP-= welcome addition to"our town. But Let's .give q a chance The end;:` at what price?Do we really want a megastore can always find a more pened nt Vemon, lVlanohester,` appropriate location:down Sullivan lootufield,_'I`hes4 ero�Y;dots - huge asphalt parking lot. of over . ' sY 500: cars and sho in carts in Avenue,. where open farm and is: eyesores,l�o aw,e watt m riskk +� -Y PP g lentifiil and a00=car neter, o ceq � place of our new Town Center P parking lot ouro ' ?.. shops and Tamil restaurants9"Do _and and -hour fights:will not,bother, ConecltottT. Y 'an one Or else force.-Stop u Qnisr has the Wwti owe want the 900-pound gorilla On, to835 h000 M 4 es oght flits`ove17.We ail w feet,which would, hrge complehenslve s�iliernn _,h fiA p our Town Center mgdest sizek.market halttns size mo elf ` r Brucenrnhain wh S01191 wiD4- i lights OII` o $ e These' super lights will`be"lit.a11 . riigtt long.That in;;itself would be:a constant irritation and eyesore. bur Town"Center.will ake-on the Iap= pearance of.a:moonscape instead-of a colonial Newigland town-green with a church and`small shops like Crandall a,ad Daughter., Planning and Zoning _ RECEIVED To Planning Department SEP 19 2000 Re: Richard S. Kelle)uand- tqp=&gip &Ve rk-et SOUTH MNOSOR PtANNENG DEPL I am against the transfer of property from the Roc viNe Bank to RichardXelley. The plan for the shopping are indkatc&ffiat the property adjacent to 50 Deming Street was-already Mr. Kelleys. This land was part of the approval for all the construction to be done by Rockville Bank. It is not Mr.-Kelley's and should not have been shown as part of the shopp!ktgnp .. I think that there should have been a diff-erential line indicating that this was the Bank's and that they were exchanging wet lands that were already assigned to Rockville Bank. I have no opinion on the Stop & Shop store coming to the Town Center, but I do think as one lawyer indicated that this is taking two bites of the same apple. I do not want approval for the exchange of property between Mr. Kelley and the Rockville Bank. Elizabeth Molloy 50 Deming ST. South Windsor, Ct. 06074 2'i �O•NN SF,`� Town G s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • .SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 September 30, 2000 Mr. Mohammad Azhar 44 Cinnamon Springs South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Azhar: RE: REQUEST FOR HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT AND TRADE NAME Please be advised that the Town of South Windsor is unable to P your your request for a home occupation permit and trade name registration at this time. We have requested and received documentation from Advance Property Management regarding the nature of your request to the Association for approval of your home occupation. It appears from these documents that the home occupation presented to the Association is not the same as the home occupation presented to the Town. The Association approval is for the selling of posters to outside locations in the area; the home occupation requested of South Windsor was for preparation and distribution of packages containing a variety of household and office items. In addition, the Association has provided documentation of a second home occupation, namely a vending machine business for Uzma Ali, for which Association approval was granted but for which no home occupation permit has been issued by the Town. In order for us to continue processing your request for home occupation approval, please submit documentation from the Association that specifies the same business for which you are requesting Town approval. Also, Planning and Zoning Commission approval is required from the vending machine business. Sincerely, Marcia A. Banach,AICP Director of Planning MB/sf cc: Gretchen Bickford, Town Clerk Walter Mealy, Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission i► 7own o-PS-oatA ?And6at 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 oe•co� AREA CODE 660 1 644-2511 October 26, 2000 Mr. Robert Eisman 68 Kelly Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Eisman: RE: REQUEST FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS INFORMATION In response to your letter dated October 16, 2000, we can provide the following information. 1. The .specific reason(s) wby this variance was r jeaed. The reasons are contained in the notice of decision dated October 11, 2000; copy enclosed. 2. A tape of* the ZBA hearing. Tape is enclosed. 3. A list of any tioning/variance changes made in last 10 years that would affect the applied for variance. The Zoning Board of Appeals official minutes are located in the Town Clerk's office and are available for your review anytime on Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. The minutes reflect all decisions of the ZBA. 4. Any notes or other information pertaining to the applied for variance, available under the FOL4. Enclosed are copies of the ZBA secretary's handwritten notes from the public hearing and deliberative sessions of October 5, 2000. Sincerely, Marcia A. Banach,AICP Director of Planning MB/sf 4 M October 16,2000 68 Kelly Road So. Windsor, CT 06074 Zoning Board of AppealsWO ° • Town Hall Sullivan Ave So. Windsor, CT 06074 To whom it may concern; It is my understanding why the variance I recently applied for was rejected. I would like to receive the following information: The specific reason(s)why this variance was rejected. A tape of the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing in question(October 5, 2000). (I understand that there is $10 charge for this service, check enclosed.) A list of any zoning/variance changes made in the last 10 years that would effect the applied for variance. (68 Kelly Road/Willow Street Area.) Any notes or other information,pertaining to the applied for variance,available under the Freedom of Information Act. Please contact me immediately if there are any questions. Thank you in advance. Sincerely; Robert Eisman TOrAL E Ci!F '!�l V D CORPORATE OFFICES Ulf 27 2000 SOUTH WINDSOR 5OCi PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. ATTENTION:WALTER MEALY MY NAME IS JON VALLES. I AM PRESIDENT OF TOTAL FITNESS, AN EXERCISE EQUIPMENT CHAIN WITH HEADQUARTER'S ON NUTMEG ROAD SOUTH. WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING TWO ACRES ACROSS THE STREET FOR OUR FUTURE HEADQUARTERS. I'M CONSIDERING THREE OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL RECREATIONAL USES IN THE BUILDING. 1. A SMALL CORPORATE FITNESS CENTER FOR OUR EMPLOYEE'S. 2. A SMALL FITNESS CENTER FOR YOUTH AND POSSIBLY ADULTS. 3. AN AMATEUR WRESTLING TRAINING CENTER FOR YOUTH AND ADULTS. (I PRESENTLY COACH THE TOWN'S YOUTH WRESTLING PROGRAM) NUMBER ONE IS A DEFINATE FOR THE BUILDING.I HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION ON EITHER NUMBER TWO OR NUMBER THREE,BUT IT WON'T BE BOTH. I NOTICED THAT SECTION 6.1.3.9 STATES RECREATIONAL USES FOR ADULT'S BUT NOT CHILDREN. I SPOKE TO MICHELLE AND SHE SUGGESTED I GET THIS IN TO YOU BEFORE TUESDAY'S MEETING SO IT CAN BE BROUGHT UP THEN. SINCERELY, JON VALLES PRESIDENT 279 NUTMEG ROAD SOUTH • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 • FAX(860)291-9952 NOV-21-2000 15:15 CNTRL CT MORTGAGES 860 513 1015 P.01i01 November 21, 2000 TO: Marcia Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor FROM: Northeast Developing of Connecticut, LLC Lucien N. Ouellette, Manager P.O. Bozo 6 East Windsor Hill., CT 06028 860-872-8946 or 860-778-7774 Dear Marcia, I respectfully request to be added to the agenda on the December 12, 2000 P.Z.C. Meeting to discuss a Senior Housing Site consisting of 20 Units. Thank you, Lucien N. Ouellette TOTAL P.01 �It TOWn O-PSOU& ?40Znd460t 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f R Co AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 December 1, 2000 Marianne Lassman Fisher, Mayor Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Renovations, repairs and improvements to Veteran's Memorial Park Pool Dear Mayor Lassman Fisher: At its November 28, 2000 Regular Meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the improvements proposed for Veteran's Memorial Pool. The Commission is looking forward to reviewing the site plan/special exception application. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Sincerely, a Walter Mealy, Chair Planning and Zoning Commission MRL/dlw cc: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer t ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURES, INC. Providing Design & Construction Services For The Food Industry Corporate Office ❑ 2148 Embassy Drive 950 Walnut Ridge Drive ❑ 110 Columbia Street,Suite 107 Lancaster,PA 17603 Hartland,WI 53029 Vancouver,WA 98660 717.431.3045 262.369.3535 360.604.3534 717.431.3048[Fax] 262.369.3536 [Fax] 360.699.1700[Fax] December 26, 2000 Ms. Marcia A. Banach, AICP Director of Planning Town of South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor,CT 06074 RE: US Foodservice 625 Nutmeg Rd South Windsor,CT Dear Ms. Banach: Thank you for the preliminary review over the counter last Tuesday, 12/19/00, regarding the referenced property owner location. Per your request, I have included three (3) photographs taken from Nutmeg Road of the proposed area. The new maintenance room will be adjacent to the existing electrical room as shown in the photographs. Also enclosed is the change order form requesting and admistrative staff site change. If this proposal meets your approval,we would greatly appreciate an expedited process. If you have any additional questions, please call me @ 717-431-3045. Sincerely, Timothy N. Nguyen (Win) Project Manager Enclosures c: B. Barke BERMAN & Russo ATTORNEYS AT LAW ? 819 CLARK STREET t SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 06074 \' TELEPHONE(860) 644-1548 (800) 352-8157 FAX(860) 644-6285 •_ JON D. BERMAN 47 WEST MAIN STREET FRANK W. RUSSO AVON, CONNECTICUT 06001 JAMES E. SULICK_ __ TELEPHONE(860) 674-9222 "February 16, 2000 -� REPLY TO: SOUTH WINDSOR Michele M. R. Lipe Asst Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Society for Outdoor Sculpture Inc. /313 Pleasant Valley Road Dear Ms. Lipe: I am writing to confirm our conversation concerning the above referenced matter. I have asked you to assume the following: The Society for Outdoor Sculpture ("SOS") wishes to operate a beverage container redemption center at 313 Pleasant Valley Road, South Windsor, (the "Property") which is in an Industrial Zone. SOS employees will bring recyclable items (such as bottles or cans) to the Property to package them for removal to other locations. The redemption center will not be open to the public, nor will the public be bringing items to the redemption center. The number of SOS employees on site will be one to three. Assuming the above facts are accurate, I understand that you believe this to be a permitted use for 313 Pleasant Valley Road under section 6.1.2.1 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations. If this is accurate, please sign in the space indicated below. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, �4 rank W. Russo Assuming the facts set forth above are accurate. I believe that the use described is a permitted use at 313 Pleasant Valley Road under 6.1.2.1 of the South Windsor Zoning Regulations. r 7- - Michele M. R. Lip February�, 2000 wpdoeskandi elsoci ety 39 Alexander Place South Windsor, CT 06 July 19, 2000 Phone: (860) 644-6827 ��U Planning&Zoning Commission South Windsor, CT 06074 To All Members and Alternates: We have recently applied for a building permit to add an approximately eight-hundred square foot addition to our house. The entire application has been approved with the single exception of the front door — hereafter referred to as "the door." Apparently, the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required for the door, and at last night's meeting it was rejected. This topic should be on the agenda again for the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 25, 2000. As we understand the issue, the problem all revolves around the word "office" on the addition plans. The design is such that the room labeled office is the room that has the door. First,let us make clear that the room labeled office is not an office in the sense of a business office. It is a room in a house that will have in it, those things that are normally associated with a home office. Many homes have them. Sometimes this room is called a"den," other times it is called a,"study." Unfortunately, we used the word"office." In retrospect, a more appropriate name would be den or study. If this is your problem with this issue,please advise us as to the name you prefer, and we will resubmit the plans with that name on them. The door was placed where it is, because it was the most reasonable place to put it. You might notice that the addition has two front doors and two sliders. The house is in a quite neighborhood, and we wanted to be able to enjoy the outdoors. A suggestion was made to move the door to the side of the house. Other than using it as a fire escape,it has little vala`e there. We don't typically go out to that side of the house—or the other,for that matter. Aesthetically,it was our determination that the house looks better with the door, than without. The room the door opens into (the so-called office) also has in it, a staircase that leads up to the bedrooms. This is hardly the kind of thing that would be found in a business office. What would also be in the room, is a desk, bookcase, filing cabinet, phone, computer, probably a radio, perhaps a television,perhaps a table, and probably a fax machine. Right now, all of those things exist in the house. As a point of reference, both of the new bedrooms will also probably at some point have a phone,radio, television, and, money-permitting, a computer. With the exception of the fax machine,we will bet that most of you have all of these things in your house. And it is likely that most of them are all in either one or two rooms. As for use of the door, please consider the following: Anyone who comes to the house is more likely- than-not,to use the current front door. It is the closest door to the driveway, and is the one that visitors would naturally go to. Since the children's bedrooms will be on the same side of the house as the new Planning&Zoning Commission July 19,2000 Page 1 of 2 door(one is directly above the door), and the staircase leads directly from the bedrooms to the room the door is in, it would be"the door of choice" for the children to run into and out of the house. Perhaps the problem is aggravated by the fact that we have a"minor home occupation" at our house. Depending upon how it is calculated, the minor occupation uses about ten to twenty square feet of permanent space. It is likely that most of this space would be consolidated into the new room. And although the occupation space will likely be expanded, it is unlikely to use even one-half of the new room. The room itself does not exist solely for any business purpose. It would most likely be the room where the children work on their school projects. If it has a table, it will get them out of the kitchen. Yes—it needs a table! The"minor home occupation" is not charged and does not pay any rent or other consideration for use ofthe space. As previously stated,the space used is quite small. The occupation itself is very telephone intensive. Business is primarily conducted over the telephone, and the preferred spot to do this in the summer months would be in the back yard, or on the deck overlooking the back yard. Most of the business of the home occupation would be conducted somewhere other than in the room with the door. As for the law--it has been pointed out that the door might conflict with section 4.8.2 subpart H. This states "No entrance or exit in the dwelling or on the premises may be added solely for the conduct of the home occupation." As stated previously, the door exists for both aesthetic and practical reasons. The door is intended to be used by the children and us. I absolutely guarantee that it will be used by us. It is very unreasonable to assume that it is being added solely for the conduct of the home occupation. The number of persons that go through any door on the premises for the purpose of the home occupation, is conservatively(and honestly)estimated to be well under one per week. A month could easily pass where no one enters. It has also been argued, that the room with the door could be converted into a business office and the door could then be used exclusively for the business. Certainly it is not our intention to do that now or in the future. Furthermore, we submit that anyone with a door could at some future time decide to use that door primarily or exclusively for a business purpose. Using such irrational logic,front doors would not be allowed anywhere. Doors could be dangerous—maybe they should be outlawed. Soon maybe only outlaws will have doors. Certainly no one should be allowed to have more than one door. Seriously, you are welcome to come over to visit or call to discuss this further. One or both of us will be at the meeting to discuss this on Tuesday, July 25. Thank-you for taking the time to read and consider this. Sincerely Yours, Donald Kunz Sharon Kunz Planning&Zoning Commission July 19,2000 Page 2 of 2