Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
92-34P Earth Removal (2)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM � SOR•CON� Application No. : - Date Rec veT jr d : �� AUG 20 t992 Action/ ubli Heari g' by; - R e c e i p N o. : 15. - South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission APPLICANT: SIAL 9ArzTFcFJ> �' CC�wW t_ (ate A?--,Act. ADDRESS : 14 6.1LnnMJ ��F� E647 AAL7k r,> C-T Q6)o8 TELEPHONE : W9_4Z47 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : gum; Y. nitCUes-,P.a ADDRESS : IS&1 ".0 �;W�i 'EA-&; AM FcW> C-r. C;ic)& COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: VAS-rcF W-c'AD-o fast C,F k-r- Epjc.L Co. ZONE: �. E" =. NAME, ADDRESS , & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Sc��P� 5. RNA ���►� �FEv�coNAc.S, »c,. 441G TELEPHONE: THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check one of the following) 1 . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) . 2 . Subdivision . 3 . Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required) . 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) . 6. Site Plan of Development . — — y• WaxLt ►x&f b4. WJDC.XNxWbd4 t Earth Removal [Section 9 ] (Public Hearing Required) . 8. General Plan of Development . 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision . 10. Other (explain in detail) : CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLIC TE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ON ATTACHED CHECKLIST. Allu e Applicant Owner TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION Ap-- SITE PLANS APPLICANT r+K"iNv� L-,ic.vr -_i PROJECT NAME F-AtST aARj7CVj> This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P. E. /L.S . ) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplies . ✓ 1 . On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following informations ✓ a . Name, address and telephone of applicant . __._✓ b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. C . Name of Development. d. Date when drawings were made . 2 . Key Maps An overall map drawn tb a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet, which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps . This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet . _�JIA a . Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units , parking requirements , etc. IU�A b. Layout of buildings N A C. Layout of streets and parking. +� d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows . U A e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows . _ f . Names of surrounding property owners . lJ�A g . Proposed open spaces and recreation areas . ✓ h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties . Olt, 3 . Architectural Elevations: Plans of the proposed buildings, drawn to a scale of 1 8" - 1 ' - 0" showing the elevations of all sides of the proposed buildings in sufficient detail to show architectural styling. W/A Architect' s seal on elevations for buildings in excess of 5000 square feet (per CGS Chapter 390 ) . 4 . Plot Plan: A layout ma of the proposed site drawn wn to a P P scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheetss ( 1 ) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; ( 2 ) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled ihargin, containing the following data : a . Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pifis required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line stations, curve data, and parking spaces . C . Building lines in accordance with toning regulations . d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened) e . Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose. f . Names of abutting property owners . g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of burvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points, or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. i . A-2 certification; P . E. /L.S . Seal . 5 . Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: NlA a . All existing and proposed buildings . ��A b. Curb lines and pavement width, sidewalks . IV�A C . Existing and proposed sanitary sewers . ulQ d . Existing and proposed water and gas main systems . e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines . / Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. f . Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot / intervals and spot elevations . +� g. Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. ►JjA h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes . (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches. ) N�A I . Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed. j . Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits . k. A-2 Certification; P. E. /L.S, Seal . 01A. 6 . Landscaping plan. Nla 7 . Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines . 01A. B . Traffic report. 9 . Plans and Profilest A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profilo paper bf scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontallyt and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins and containing the followings a . Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage. C . Sight line at driveway & street intersections . d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e . Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations . Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material . f . Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions . g. Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls . The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices , determine the accessibility of these controls . h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes , including elevations , sizes, lengths, and Slopes of pipes . Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. N A 10 . Open Space Site Improvement Plana: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. IJ�A 11 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems; the report should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points ! a . General nature and development of surrounding area . b. Topography and natural drainage pattern . C . Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level Conditions , ledge rock, and general nature of soil . _ d. General description of type of development contemplated. e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities P , indicating sizes for various round conditions,ns materials to be► used, and the general layout pattern to be used, etc . f . Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems . g. Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout. h, Flood heights of any nearby streams , brooks , or rivers . A i . Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4 . 13 . 5 . All information required above is included in this application at the time of submission . ZZ c�/y Z PL P P ER ( .�. L.S . ) DAT November, 1987 E� MEMORANDUM August 26, 1992 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel We have reviewed the drawings dated August 14, 1992 for the proposed East Hartford Sand & Gravel project and have the following comments: 1 . The proposal is to drain all of the storm water from Phases 4 to 7 into the pond on K. F. Brick's property. This pond has no outlet and is lined with clay, making it a "retention basin" . Please have applicant supply a drainage study showing pre and post development flows, capacity of pond etc. 2 . Test pits are shown on plans, but no test pit information given. Please have applicant provide that information. 3 . There seems to be an error in calculation of the areas for each phase. Please have applicant verify. 4. A "Temp. Culvert" is shown in Phase 4. When will this be installed as the drainage ditches are to be constructed as excavation progresses (Excavation Sequence Note #5) . Also how long will this be in place? 5. Drainage ditches - a more detailed plan of construction is required - the note "Construct Drainage Ditch As Excavation Progresses" is not sufficient. 6 . The plan submitted shows final grading when all phases are complete. A Phase by Phase grading plan should be submitted. It is recommended that this be submitted only if this application is approved. 7 . The detail "General Site Restoration" seems to conflict with other details - i.e. 20" min. sand is shown under 4" topsoil and other details show 4" topsoil over native soil. 8 . A siltation berm may be appropriate as a temporary sedimentation control measure. The Engineering Division cannot make a recommendation on this proposal until the above comments have been addressed. JCl/jsv d sign,?oe fessionais, inc. 4 civil engineers • planners • surveyors September 17, 1992 Mr . John McCahill , Zoning and Wetlands Enforcement Officer South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor , CT 06074 0� $SEPP'-Iny Dear John, �� �1992 Re: East Hartford Sand & Gravel ICI,, South Windsor Job No. 86-119 "Lvi) WETLANDS AGENCY (:UNSERVA1ION COMMISSION This letter is to follow up on our telephone conversation and subsequent discussion during the IWA meeting on September 14, 1992 pertaining to this project. The following items including a copy of a letter sent to Jerry Iazzetta should clarify our responses to questions brought up during these discussions. 1 . John Ianni has provided information and his opinion regarding the value of the wetlands area proposed to be disturbed. 2. The existing access drive through property owned by K-F Erick is composed essentially of stone dust, crushed brick and gravel . This access drive is entirely located on the K-F Brick Property and as such, the applicant has no control over the maintenance or layout of this drive. Whereas K-F Brick primarily uses the drive to haul clay fron an active pit, it is estimated that East Hartford Sand and Gravel will have on average 3 truckloads a day. It is important to note that the proposed access through the site as shown on the plans is not permanent . 3. Note #1 under the typical excavation sequence addresses the field delineation from limits of clearing. 4. The applicant has indicated that all stumps will be chipped and used for mulching, etc. Please feel free to contact our office should you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely yours, seph 1Peprna Project Engineer cc: Art Silvestri 441C Governors Highway, South Windsor, CT 06074 0 (203) 291-8755 • FAX: (203) 291-8757 6, A phase by phase grading plan can be submitted if this -Application is approved although this seems redundant „ e "Nli- ive Sail" as depicted in the consti'!tction details, is inferred to be. sand, which is the material that is being e:tca.,ated from the site. 8. Tefnp,:,Y'a)-Y sedimentation berms were utilized between sorts t,-i is t i ort ptwa-es for Phases 1-3 to control erosion as the area v eq_r..aded Naas essentially flat with sheet flaw, For Phases 4 through 7, tF►iu Ci-oposed drainage ditches will act as sedimentation cc,llectir,tt points which will periodically be cleaned. Hybale chests _.as shoos on the sedimentation and erosion control plan are tt-, t-Rma.irt in place far- the duration of the excavation activity. F lnasR feel flee to cc,t-titact o!tr- office should you have ariy fl..trtheY gtlestic+rls or wish to visit the situ dur-iIIg c,t-lr- pt esertce. 9iYIcerely yours, .7�,seph J. Per rya Project Engineer cc ; ohn McCah i 11. Marcia panach AF t- Silvestri. i esigssin rofeonals, inc. 1qI—, • plan-'s • 9u ey— 441C Governors Highway, South Windsor, CT 06074 • (203),291-8755 • FAX: (203) 291-8757 NEW t:NGLAND BORING CONTRAQTOR OF CT. INC. CLIENT ___Design Professionals BORING 109 COMMERCE STREET NUMBER GLASTONBURY, CT 06033 PROJECT NAME -- K.F. Brick oropany (M) 633-4649 — (413) 733-1232 --B`�-- LOCATION South Windsor. CT, SHEET -- __ ARCHITECT No. UFi,L_LER R. Burtchell ENGINEER -- - FILE NO. of INSPECTOR Casing Sampler Core Barrel _ .�? �s�nn.8ult TYPE HS _SS SURFACE ELEV. GATE START -- 6 --�� SIZE 1.0 ALL. _1=.3 >z1 LINE & STATION HAMMER WT 140 — DArE FINISH HAMMER FALL. —_.___— _ 3011 -- OFFSET — - __.___- SAMPLE -___------- — ---- - - — - - - I- �- — BLOWS PER-6_" COI.. STRATA CL _ _ A CHANGE III NO- SAMPLE FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS NO- DEPTH RANGE R REC. n 06 611- i2-18 .5 Peat, Organic Material 2 `2 1 tt 5' S? 5.0-7.0 — 5 6 _ Red Br. Fine-Med. Sand tf 8.0 10 t ----3 -- --- - ---- - 2 11 _ 2011 — ---- Br. Fine-Crs. Sand, 15' S4 + 15.0-17.0 9 11 Tr. Fine Gravel 1 rt 19.5 Gray Silt, Tr. Clay 2.5 tt ---- 27.0 - 30' — — Bottom of Boring 27.0 Water @ 7.0 NOTES. t The sirat:ti.alion-iihas ropr.sent SAMPLE PENETRATION RESISTANCE PROPORTIONS +- Ine a+:ro,mere eouh.iary be- REMARKS: t..een sod types transitions may 140 lb.Wt.falling 30"on 2' O.D.Sampler be Conesioniess Density cottesiva Consistency trace 0 to 10% 21 Ylak,- Ie,ul re-+durys ;cave i u 0 4 Very Loose 0.2 Very Soft little 10 t0 20% male 1r.ine ?rill �Olea at time 'I'd urdsr cva:ib:ms stmod or 5-9 Loose 34 Soft _ v:r be^n; loge ztUCtJa:b?ns it 10-29 Mad, Dense 5.8 M,ryttff some 20 to 35% the level of grjc.ndwaier may 30.49 dense 9.15 Stiff dae 'o otter lectors tear. 50 Very Dense 16-30 Y-Stiff and- 35 to 50% COL.A these present at tre t:,`,e�r,4as:r�- I �,ents«ere r a.7r.. 31 * Hard j _—� I NEW ENG' ,�tili BORINT; CONTRACTOR OF CT. INC. � CLIENT—._ Bn-P >Z r WRING - -fe_aninna13��._.__ tti9 CCMtAEP,GE STREET Nlj'.tEiER GL.ASTONBURY CT 06033 PROJECT NAME ____X,•F_Brick_-Companv T2031 633-4649 -- (413) 733-1232 _ _--__- --_-_-___.__ LOCATION_ ._ South Windso� �T SHEET ARCHITECT No 01111_L LR R. Bur.tebell EIGINEER FILE NO. mSPECTOR Casing Sampler Care Barrel —$��'SBnaUlt SURFACE ELEV. TYPE _H5— _S.S — GATE START $j�f8e— SIZE 10. 2—Ltt -- L,NE & STATION HAMMER VvT. 140 VATI: FINISH —$� ��_--_ 14AMMER FALL --_—_-- - � OFFSET-----.._._. I SAMPLE BLOWS PER d" — COL. STRATA FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS u NO DEf'fH RANGE GIN SAMPLER REC. A CHANCE 0-6 Ei•11. 12•t$ S 2 5.0-7_ .0-_.._..... S. 5 7 7 20" t Wit S3 u10.t)-1 1) 4 Red Br. Tan Fine-Crs. Sand � ---- - - _ -- 4 I15' S4 15.0-17.0 4 3 -_ -_- 2 2 24" 16.5 17.0 Gray Silt, Some Clay,, Tr.- --- _ 20 Bottom of Boring 17.0 Water @ 3.0 --t--------------- — - — n rh= ;val.:wat:on ar es re^..esent SAMPLE PENETRATION RESIST0.,CE PROPORTIONS REMARKS: :h= aGFr^nrr3te Dcc?dary Da- 140 Ib Wt.failing on 30" 2"O.Q. amP S lei tw:a,,geq t•'pla,b3nc•lip.:5•nay re;raJ•a1. Conesioniess-Density Conasrae Consiste,:iy- trace 0 to 10% 1' t,;r Ib•.l .eadr:p i•aoe ':55'• mail,m me ln6 r.c,;es at tires 0-4 Very Looses 0-2 Very Salt tittle 10 t0 2t3% 1 u.:ae- c)Idltte.�s alai.: o•+ 5.9 Loose 3•4 soft he trc nc 1-! Fq.W.at.ons ,, 10-29 Med.Dense 5.9 M/StIfI sorne 20 to 35% `t;a IC r! GI 3rG m:ywdi^_r '.ay i 30-sg De�:e 9.15 Stiff x4:we tc omer ta•ro•e .rar• and 35`0 60% COL.A t thcsetx., ^tat�h=c.^emvs..ru- SO� Very DensB 16.30 V-Stitt —• -- -^-- I _ c-en?s wea mare 31 • Hares PLANNING DEPARTIMNT 4 IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Jean Zurbrigen, Karl Reichle, Michael Gantick, Mel Stead, Fr haw, Sgt... Gerald Lewis, Fire Marshall Lanning, James Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have receiv d plans or the following project: # ��-3 Li P /--�J'f �.-' ?� f� - Q (f►a L^�( �" ram,d u',�-�'-{=rr-, - Zone Acreage l ev j cLcc-a vaa Subdivision Site Plan_ . Residential No. of Lots/Units Commercial Industrial_ Location: Project Description: L 1 a-ic _ 02/aAn 3 g 41te c d.(rled-j 2 ewe. Future Town owned property involved? Yes_ No_�- (a) new streets_ (existing frontage also)_ (b) new open space/recreation area active passive- (c) new.detention area Planning Department comments -IG"r- Please let me know i by 'J-Z� if you will have comments on s appl ation so- that I can follow up with your department when I d Planni Department report. h� PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Jean Zurbrigen, Karl Reichle, Michael Gantick, Mel Stead, Sgt. Gerald Lewis, Fire Marshall Lanning, James FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have receive d plans for the following project: # qZ'3 Zone Acreage Subdivision Site Plane Residential No. of Lots/Units Commercial Industrial_ Location: Project Description: a -dre.,I yu- Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No V (a) new streets_ (existing frontage also)_ (b) new open space/recreation area active_ passive- (c) new detention area_ 11 Planning Department comments co Please let me know by if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. ' i I ■ esign rofessionals, inc. September 30, 1992 civil engineers • planners • .surveyors ■ Mr. Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Jerry, Re: East Hartford Sand & Gravel (Phases 4-7) Project No. 86-119 This letter is to follow up on our discussion of September 22, 1992 pertaining to site drainage for this. project. The following information should address any concerns you may have regarding pre and post development flows for the area. Under existing conditions, drainage for this site discharges via an existing drainage swale to an active clay pit on the K-F Brick property to the southeast. The estimated runoff of this area for a 100-year storm event is estimated to be 2.7 CFS for existing conditions and 21 .8 CFS for proposed conditions. The active clay pit to which the site is draining is approximately 27 acres in area and 25 feet deep as of this date. The pit has no outlet and is therefore a "retention area" with a potential to store over 29,000,000 cubic feet of. runoff. When considering the runoff from a 100 year storm event from our site, this amounts to an increase of less than 1/2 inch in water elevation. Since the clay pit is active and will continue to grow in the future, the effects on water surface elevation from our site will lessen with time. Based on these observatins, any increase in runoff due to the proposed activity on the site is insignificant when considering the growth of the clay pit and rate of evaporation over such a large area. Our research has found that the 'average annual pond and lake evaporation value for this area of the United State as published by the National Weather Service is approximately 25-50 inches per year. (See attachment from National Weather Service) . Please feel free to contact our office should you have any further questions regarding this issue. Sincerely yours, RECEIVED Kf1tAr vault, P.E. OL HP 3 0 1992 0- 4 To►n of South Windsor Enc. Engineering S cc: Art Si lvest 6 Jepr' 441C Governors Highway, South Windsor, CT 06074 (203) 291-8755 • FAX: (203) 291-8757 MEMORANDUM October 2, 1992 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town EngineA2- RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel - We have reviewed the revised drawings for the proposed East Hartford Sand and Gravel site plan dated 9-29-92 and Mr. R. Arsenault's letter of September 30, 1992 and have the following comments: 1 . If this site plan is approved, it is recommended that a phase by phase grading plan be submitted, reviewed and approved. This plan should clearly show limits of clearing. 2 . Mr. Arsenault's letter addresses my comment concerning "zero increase in runoff" and the proposed usage of the clay pit on K-F Brick property for runoff from this site. There is an increase in runoff of from 8 .7 cfs to 21.8 cfs during a 100 year storm. This is being channeled into a retention area large enough for the runoff and would normally not be a concern. However, as this retention area is not on the applicant's property, a concern arises as to the possibility of this access and usage being terminated by K-F Brick. If the applicant can show perpetual usage permission given by K-F Brick, this concern would be eliminated. If not, then provisions should be made for retention/detention of this storm water on the applicants property. k1'� (n altNF l-``LJ b'.gC-e vk .E-� .. .. fi[ma's'`_ rl y,', �-..- ,`)r<. r FE. k/V-4- �4 - / l��`✓< i.FJ_ 7.+t �`.��•�! ;!� f�--..( ALL( �l.,tP �i f,'r,1 ':b•`j� JCl/jsv cc: John McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works � deer K F BRICK, INC. /;/{ THE LARGEST MANUFACTURER OF FACE BRICK IN NEW ENGLAND P.O.Box 375,East Windsor Hill,CT.06028 Tel. (203)528-9421 FAX(203)289-7485 October 5, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Historically, KF Brick, Inc. have dealt with all of the surface water emanating ` from the adjoining sand pit operated by East Hartford Sand and Gravel, Ina, We have no objection to this practice continuing for the foreseeable future and certainly no objection for the. four phases being applied for at the moment �z) J.D. Hayhurst Plant Manager JDH/ljr 0017 ® A Member of Steetley BrIcK Inc. (' n • ; t- f EAST HARTFORD SAND AND GRAVEL - PUBLIC HEARING 10/6/92 1 . R cav 'n f far- and a f F�rav �.st .�ber S 1`tV C-d.- 714 rr tea a —_ctiv ...•..t-.'1� �.za�.»}lY1lY Dh�•• 'LTT r f-ra�previousrPZC approval granted in June 1987 . One of the approval conditions from the previous approval was that phases must be stabilized as excavation is completed. Our zoning/wetlands enforcement officer has indicated that stabilization on the site has proceeded satisfactorily. 2. The area for which excavation approval is sought tonight is completely in the Rural Residential zone a - r`t-y- In the past there had been a relationship between K-F Brick and East Hartford Sand and Gravel, on K-F Brick property, whereby East Hartford Sand and Gravel excavated the top layer of sand and .gravel, and K-F Brick then excavated the clay. Now East Hartford Sand and Gravel is excavating on property owned by them, and the excavation will not go beyond the 4g sand and gravel layer. 3 . Aees o e si cnriuta-b the�xgh K-F Brick pre p€�rr---R-e t-•----5 -- a--&•r-� a&y-d-i-reGt.l—..onto Reute.-5 or--vabicloes- t-e---rrse Br:ickyardx=Road---on.t�- Str©ng�--Read a---�themrarilroad-ticks-. 4. T t7lrer sib. IWA/CC approved the site plan last night with the following approval conditions: . - A specific phase by phase grading. plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by Town staff prior to advancing into each subsequent phase. - Each phase shall be stabilized, as stated on . the plans, prior to the start of a subsequent phase. - Satisfactory dust control must be maintained on the access drive. IWA/CC is also requiring a $10,000 erosion and sediment control bond, which will cover restabilization upon completion of each phase of excavation . 5 . As excavation of the site progresses eastward, clearing of the trees on the site has been proceeding. The current tree line is located basically east of Phases 4 and 6 . The IWA/CC had considered requiring the applicant to replant tree seedlings upon stabilized phases. However, reports from the soil scientist indicated that the excavated areas were likely to become inland wetlands areas because of the proximity of excavation to the groundwater y t surface. Therefore, tree planting was inadvisable, and the areas should be allowed to undergo natural succession instead. 6 . Y-:- (regulations allow up to 1:2) ;� r 3 rv,;4andV some cuts up-�o# 4-5 feet into the groundwater table. a"t Section 14 of the zoning regulations provide guidelines for PZC for the approval of sand and gravel operations, including the effect of such removal on surrounding property and the future usefulness of the premises when the operation is complleted. Also according the the provisions of Section 14, such permits shall be issued for a period not exceeding two years; the regulations also allow PZC to grant unspecified extensions of time or modifications to the scope of work originally approved. If approved, Planning Dept. has no requested approval modifications . L;ffm K F BRICK, INC. THE LARGEST MANUFACTURER OF FACE BRICK IN NEW ENGLAND P.O. Box 375, East Windsor Hill, CT 06028 Tel. (203)528-9421 FAX (203)289-7485 November 3, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Historically, KF Brick, Inc. have dealt with all of the surface water emanating from the adjoining sand pit operated by East Hartford Sand and Gravel, Inc., We have no objection to continue handling the surface water for the four phases being applied for and we support the application. J. J.D. Hayhurst Plant Manager JDHtljr 0017 A Member of Steetley Brick, Inc. <°,MN °f,c LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL s 02-Co�'`� PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF . SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ( 203) 644-2511 DATE TO:- ', VAft4 J0-4a t vA l aAA— WE ARE SENDING YOU: P & Z initial plans Drainage comps P & Z final plans Bond estimate requests Inland Wetlands plans Bond reduction requests Final plans for filing Change order form Other Correspondence Copies Appl. No. Pro ect THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For review and comment For your file 4— For your use Returned with revisions As requested Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: COMMENTS: Copy to: From: �i � 3 P44 Z�� A 1992 u.c� ring �'l �i/�'/9 L �.��?Q En ee Q ,_ �Q .- peps• �, MEMORANDUM November 5, 1992 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel - Bo Setting We have reviewed the Bond Estimate Form dated November 3, 1992 for the East Hartford Sand & Gravel site and do not agree with the estimate amount. The only items indicated are: "Haybales/Silt Fencing" and "Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation. " It is felt that not only are the quantities indicated insufficient for all four (4) phases, but several items are missing. Indicated below are the items we feel should be added to this estimate so that stabilization of the site can be accomplished: Strip and Stockpile Topsoil Swale Construction 50 LF 15" CMP Culvert Placing Topsoil (Two Phases) Fertilizing, Seeding & Mulching (Two Phases ) We would appreciate your input as to what items Planning feels should be included in this bonding estimate. JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM November 9, 1992 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineftnti RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel - g �j We have reviewed the Bond Estimate Form dated November 3, 1992 for the East Hartford Sand & Gravel site and do not agree with the estimate amount. The only items indicated are: "Haybales/Silt Fencing" and "Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation. " It is felt that not only are the quantities indicated insufficient for all four (4) phases, but several items are missing. Mr. John McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer, and I have discussed this and indicated below are the items we feel should be added to this estimate so that stabilization of the site can be accomplished: a. Swale Construction 1,000 LF @ $15 = $ 15,000 b. 50 LF 15" CMP Culvert 50 LF @ $25 = 1,250 C. Placing Topsoil (2 Phases) (5 .4 Acres x 43,000 : 9). x $2 .50 = 64,500 d. Fertilizing, Seeding & Mulching (2 Phases) (5.4 Acres x 43,000 _ 9) x $2 .50 = 64,500 In addition, the following are our estimates for the placing of silt fence and maintenance of same: e. Haybales/Silt Fence 1,100 LF @ $4 = 4,400 f . Maintenance of Erosion Control = 4,400 Sub Total = $154,050 25% Contingency = 38,513 Total = $192,563 Based upon the above, it would be recommended that the total bond for erosion control should be $192, 000 . 00 . JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works John McCahill, Zoning/Wetland Enforcement Officer . r )RANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning DATE: November 10, 1992 RE: Appl. #92-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel Bond Attached is a memorandum from the Engineering Dandr&mentGra regarel. ding bonding for erosion control for Eastfar artfordthe Town Engineer did the alwhichuIanotedcalcltions�aththeopublicuhearing exceeded the original estimate al, e in would be around $20,000 .00 . Our initial estimate was alsoionr(the line with past bonding practice for this particular previous 3 phases had a total $5,000 .00 bond) . Therefore, after discussion with Jerrylalletta, and Johan bond Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement officer, we of the actual estimate would beeSeasonabpermithitself1isnonlys for gtwo track record with previous phas s provides good site years, with renewal required. The two-yearpermit protection. Please note, however, that the atta d costs for any sand provides and realistic estimate of total stabilization gravel operation. In theeenhe that new e d gravel estimateswillmostPlikelynbe are undertaken in the future, within this order of magnitude. MAB/pmm r a MEMORANDUM November 9, 1992 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel - n tti g �j We have reviewed the Bond Estimate .Form dated November 3, 1992 for the East Hartford Sand & Gravel site and do not agree with the estimate amount. The only items indicated are: "Haybales/Silt Fencing" and "Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation. " It is felt that not only are the quantities indicated insufficient for all four (4) phases, but several items are missing. Mr. John McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer, and I have discussed this and indicated below are the items we feel should be added to this estimate so that stabilization of the site can be accomplished: a. Swale Construction 1,000 LF @ $15 _ $ 15,000 b. 50 LF 15" CMP Culvert 50 LF @ $25 = 1,250 C. Placing Topsoil (2 Phases) (5 .4 Acres x 43,000 , 9 ). x $2 .50 64,500 d. Fertilizing, Seeding & Mulching (2 Phases) (5 .4 Acres x 43,000 : 9) x $2.50 = 64,500 In addition, the following are our estimates for the placing of silt fence and maintenance of same: e. Haybales/Silt Fence 1,100 LF @ $4 = 4,400 f . Maintenance of Erosion Control = 4,400 Sub Total = $154,050 25% Contingency = 38,513 Total = $192,563 Based upon the above, it would be recommended that the total bond for erosion control should be $192,000. 00 . JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works John McCahill, Zoning/Wetland Enforcement Officer 'MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning DATE: November 10, 1992 RE: Appl. #92-34P, East. Hartford Sand & Gravel Bond Attached is a memorandum from the Engineering Department regarding bonding for erosion control for East Hartford Sand & Gravel. When the Town Engineer did the actual calculations, the bond amount far exceeded the original estimate, which I noted at the public hearing would be around $20,000.00 . Our initial estimate was also more in line with past bonding practice for this particular operation (the previous 3 phases had a total $5,000 .00 bond) . Therefore, after discussion with Jerry Iazzetta, and John McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer, we all agree that a bond of 10% of the actual estimate would be reasonable. The applicant has a good track record with previous phases . The permit itself is only for two years, with renewal required. The two-year permit provides good site protection. Please note, however, that the attached bond estimate provides a realistic estimate of total stabilization costs for any sand and gravel operation. In the event that new sand and gravel operations are undertaken in the future, the bond estimates will most likely be within this order of magnitude. MAB/pmm �tO*M SE,` 'Y %� �s� V&U/460t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ��psoa•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 November 23, 1992 Mr. Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel 14 Gilman. Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: Re: Application #92-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on November 10, 1992 to approve with modifications the above- referenced application for a Site Plan for earth removal in Phases 4- 7 on 9 . 3 +/- acres of land, located on the westerly side of Strong Road, easterly of Route 5, I & RR zones as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. , Job No. 86-119 dated August 14, 1992 and revised through September 29, 1992 . This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff . 2 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $20,000.00. 3 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 4 . The applicant shall submit a legal document obtaining the rights to drain on abutting property. 5 . This approval is valid until 11/10/94 . Black and white transparent mylars of sheet #3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands-Agency/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. Arthur Silvestri Page # November 23, 1992 Application #92-34P After the mylars have been signed by the. Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within 90 days . After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, Frank Castro, Vice - Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission FC/pmm cc: Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission Planning Director Chief Building Official Town Engineer Supt. Of Pollution Control Assessor Fire Marshal Registrar of Voters k� I - I��y/ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 9 G SOR.Co��`i PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE fr SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 7�Z 193 (203 ) 644-2511 DATE TO: J-fA Z U-4 o C bf;South iyfnds�� Erin WE ARE SENDING YOU: P & Z initial plans Drai mps P & Z final plans Bond estimate requests Inland Wetlands plans Bond reduction requests Final nlans for filing Change order form Other Correspondence Copies Appl. No. Pro ect THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For review and comment For your file For your use Returned with revisions As requested Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: COMMENTS: e vt e,,j cl'Z'L(n,c. 2�J P rye Copy to: From: G#&m/,e D)FsOPP7 0ov, /;Or 6*56 ear 47 at ax cTCr A -�wt XVz 5V&W1;W4 ,Dcddl, 1,.,rh43 �t0wN C Tlo� ap sio� 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR COS AREA CODE 203 644-2511 April 14, 1993 Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri : re: Expiring Letters of Credit Re: Application #87-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company Application #92-34P, East Hartford. Sand & Gravel Company The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter(s) of Credit: Project(s) Bank Amount Expiration EAST HARTFORD SAND SOWIND $ 5,000 05/25/93 EAST HARTFORD SAND SOWIND $ 20,000 05/25/93 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning MAB/pmn APR 16 �,?esign ofes s i o n a l s, inc. south Windsor civil engineers • planners • surveyors INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ■ CONSERVATION COMMISSION TO: &_AeL�L (-IK-- AsgttSjAAJVr Q(,AA. DATE: Am — 16,WDS, pW� Qr (nJ1'yASO1_ REGARDING: T=Asr 4y_irc D SA.v s�" 6eAyu— PROJ. NO. 86-119 S�ArVA� mast-ME�r WE ARE SENDING YOU: for your use at your request for approval for your files for review and comment THE FOLLOWING: l 1tCEE f!3� CnPt e,S of cf lkxa )aA6& SA.5Ei ®K) L F 500 PlzePegaq f 8cA►->a fuA-T ^44= Wg)7TEn� S?�SCR1Piloa� €KS A.LT-r Atxi Y�EE� �S(nt'i'C67 s �EG_L �rRL�E io �AceT �y� oF�1c� t� TuJE ,tUL N�x� �?J�Si1oti15 m� Co�C;EiJJJS, luA��k uoct, . Design Professionals, Inc. By: �aE �a 441C Governors Highway, South Windsor, CT 06074 0 (203) 291-8755 0 FAX: (203) 291-8757 SURFACE DRAINAGE EASEMENT K-F BRICK COMPANY, INC. , a Connecticut corporation with an office at 144.0 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, Connecticut, ("Grantor") for good and valuable consideration received to its full satisfaction of ENET SILVESTRI of East Hartford, Connecticut ("Grantee") does hereby grant to the Grantee, her heirs and assigns, the right to drain storm water on and over the surface of land of the Grantor located east of John Fitch Boulevard, in said Town of South Windsor. The drainage easement is fifty (50) feet wide and runs in a southwesterly direction from the Grantee's land to a clay pit located on the Grantor's land along an existing drainage swale, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a point in the boundary line between the land of the Grantor and land of the Grantee, which boundary line marks the easterly boundary of land now or formerly of the Grantor and the westerly boundary of land now or formerly of- the Grantee and which point of beginning is 417.98 feet northerly of the ' southwest corner of the land now or formerly of the Grantee as measured along the above-described boundary line; thence running S 760 10' 47" W, a distance of 242. 82 feet to a point; thence running S 13 ° 49' 13" E, a distance of 50 feet; thence running N 76° 10' 47" E, a distance of 207.43 feet, the last three courses being along land now or formerly of the Grantor; thence N 21" 27' 59" E along said mutual boundary line, a distance of 61. 25 feet to the point of beginning. The right granted herein does not include the right to construct or install any man-made drainage facilities on the land of the Grantor. In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this )� day of , 1993 . K-F BRICK COMPANY, INC. 01 Y - -1- EAL/736 ,. '. STATE OF CONNECTICUT : ss. prpt?-j 2 l q q3 COUNTY OF HARTFORD I' Personally appeared 10 4W �- ��y 2ST �'`�� gRT�Iu►2 Sl -V -S � as aforesaid, sig er of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be T,s free act and deed as such and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me J,c Aj LAMA A this a N a day of 1993. r � _ Notary Public My ctk,l«iiabs -2- EAL/736 S68 09'7*% N/F 0 K—F BRICK COMPANY , s-7 N � _ i �N � 20 . EXISTING / 61),4-7"E DRAINAGE SWALE N 0 //4r) Design Professionals, Inc. / 441 C Governors Highway �l QQoPo�EDnrti7AUrc F^ MExr� South Windsor, CT 06074 So' MEMORANDUM April 30, 1993 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer RE: East Hartford Sand & Gravel We have reviewed the "final Plans" dated 4-13-93 for the East Hartford Sand & Gravel site plan and have the following comments . 1 . The right to drain (easement) across K.F. Brick Company property should be shown on the boundary plan. 2 . The Phasing Plan should be part of the set of drawings for this site and should be indicated on the title page in the index. 3 . A General Stormwater Discharge Permit must be obtained for this site prior to construction. 4 . Note 11 on sheet 4 should indicate that if water is not sufficient to control dust, a liquid emulsion/tackifier should be used. JCl/jsv V STATE OF CONNE CUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 0001"bN DEP USE ONLY BUREAU OF WATER MANAGEMENT South Windsor REG # REGISTRATION UNDER A GL k $L&Pk%'Fommissiort CGS SECTION 22a-430b PERMIT # for STORMWATER AND DEWATERING WASTEWATER FROM FAC. ID. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES type or print neatly I. Facility Information A. Location of construction site C. Name and address of registrant Ea.14 i UAM FMt-, kn goy— Sit_uEs�R1 UT H. 14- Gi L-mNJ ram''t ma-t, Aczm n, tc, J14E ViA k F gM E_/..'T 1AA T62gr.> G'f G'�1of�i Telephone no. c��q B. Name and address of land owner FN�t Y. D. Name and address of general contractor lWt ems, fimr ercep 61 cabipa Telephone no. (._) Telephone no. �) Ownership status: Federal , State , Public , Privateer, Other Registrant status: Federal , State , Public , Private �. , Other E. Site contact person Ar-iga- JiLyES't2i Phone: (kv) 9_4347 F. Attach 8 1/2" x 11" copy of the applicable section of a USGS quadrangle map showing site boundaries and locations of all stormwater conveyances, outfalls, and channelized flows that run off the site. II. Stormwater discharge information A. Number of existing or proposed outfalls or channelized flows from the site (as shown on attached map): L-AJF (W) B. Where does stormwater discharge to? • Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System? No:}�Yes:_If yes, name: • Surface water body or wetlands? No: Yes:— (Name): ig c4u( Rf-Ta F-r,L Pnvp • Seeps into ground? No:�,<_ Yes:_ (If yes, Well:_ Seepage Pit:_ Infiltration Pond: Other: ) C. Have any stormwater quality analytical data been collected? No:- Yes:_ Of yes, maintain data from past three (3) years on site.) D. Has this discharge been previously registered by a different permittee? No X Yes:_Of yes, maintain data from pst three (3) years on site.) over it A. W I t Nyindsor _tlM82 -A,2 11 East Windsor F %,;; ;• fy �� /i o �o . 84 o.. I �i .•°��._fi r\\,) `� It o •� ` ./�. / .�� ,\• `�`� �^-ram \o � •rV'9gt, •� Edrds C .J �( i G O!1• i � 50 93 • S --��: j �� rickard- o •' ,.V SS selear -olyk 6 Ic tltutc ClaypiC 'r 6 n. „i (Hartfo •� tin w. \._ •i'_ .� t, �stat• !�• ' moo\ A, O u BM 2 �. o� r�� � ... � � 0 U,.- � �,T H •. yv �..�90 X 83 T-- w,_ ..a. •,.- - -.,n,o ° o . N e b .• r�•.• � o p l G� ..ry. „n, _ % ` •�. ;:iN O 1:��ti , o o BROAD �.__ •• `�� /.i.. °i ,I „ir./,a„ QW 01 S Q" oo\ :. � 1) •� i�._ \ ��� •e7° � �•.p, .roN.�,:?�--����` -� (�. u ` 4rc ✓ ,* � ••� •\"! -° /rE1�'tr"_Il�l'/�._:_'_ 7 "�� f` C Sou•h'�.o _J -1 ��CC. •. .� r�� a`��=/ � r /�54a • r>o. dsor (.. �-o �:�• 9a L v1n dTt u4 .r r, /' •• •• 10 P 2l n° .gip O au, • 4 MANCHESTER QUAD SCALE : Ill=2000' 1P. 0 MAY 14 1993 South Windsor SURFACE DRAINAGE EASEMENT planning & Zoning Commission K-F BRICK COMPANY, INC. , a Connecticut corporation with an office at 1400 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, Connecticut, ("Grantor") for good and valuable consideration received to its full satisfaction of ENET SILVESTRI of East Hartford, Connecticut ("Grantee") does hereby grant to the Grantee, her heirs and assigns, the right to drain storm water on and over the surface of land of the Grantor located east of John Fitch Boulevard, in said Town of South Windsor. The drainage easement is fifty (50) feet wide and runs in a southwesterly direction from the Grantee's land to a clay pit located on the Grantor's land along an existing drainage swale, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a point in the boundary line between the land of the Grantor and land of the Grantee, which boundary line marks the easterly boundary of land now or formerly of the Grantor and the westerly boundary of land now or formerly of the Grantee and which point of beginning is 417.98 feet northerly of the southwest corner of the land now or formerly of the Grantee as measured along the above-described boundary line; thence running S 76° 10' 47" W, a distance of 242 . 82 feet to a point; thence running S 13 ° 49' 13" E, a distance of 50 feet; thence running N 76' 10' 47" E, a distance of 207.43 feet, the last three courses being along land now or formerly of the Grantor; thence N 21° 27' 59" E along said mutual boundary line, a distance of 61.25 feet to the point of beginning. Said easement is more particularly shown on a map or plan entitled, "Excavation Plan Phases 4 through 7 Prepared For East Hartford Sand & Gravel South Windsor, Connecticut Date: Aug. 14, 1992 Revised 9/29/92, 4/27/93 Design Professionals, Inc. , Civil Engineers, Planners, Surveyors Sheet 3/4 , " on file or to be filed with the Town Clerk in South Windsor. The right granted herein does not include the right to construct or install any man-made drainage facilities on the land of the Grantor. -1- EAL/736 In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has caused this Surface Drainage Easement to be executed this day of , 1993 . K-F BRICK COMPANY, INC. ix—� qL(FA� By -.j•RJ .�C�.-�1� l STATE OF CONNECTICUT : . ss. COUNTY OF HARTFORD Personally appeared as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be free act and deed as such and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me this day of 199 . Notary Pu lic LINDA A. CRIFFIX NOTARY PUBLIC? p yY�QRA+".ii'a"iF ?d E:P{RE5 tM031 A 1 �O -2- EAL/736 3 . SOrM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 9 � 4�hOSOR-`O PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 51 ( 203) 644-2511 DATE D�/f3 TO: „ '20'-'; 7. CO �81 AfV1 x o ram/ g 8 �4k r 19P 9 F'�Lip/ 2 44"'oe�s�r WE ARE SENDING YOU: T j P & Z initial plans Drainage c P & Z final plans Bond estimate requests Inland Wetlands plans Bond reduction requests Final lans for filing Change order form - — Other Correspondence Copies AID 1. No. Pro ect -3 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For review and comment For your file For your use Returned with revisions As requested Other PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: COMMENTS: ,e V-A Copy to: From: aj Lap UA, &,.f71 ��i,•� — (M ¢&/93 c �y�* , Par A'fi— Ae r TO-U-111n O-P SV at fi � w � G U a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074. �`►osoR.CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 3, 1993 Mr. Arthur Silvestri East Hartford, Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: Re: Preconstruction Meeting - Application #92-34P East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company IN ATTENDANCE NAME COMPANY TELEPHONE John E. McCahill Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Ext. 229 Michele R. Lipe Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Ext. 252 Joe Perna Design Professionals, Inc . 291-8755 Art Silvestri E Hfd Sand & Gravel Co 289-4347 Jerry C. Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Ext. 245 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting. Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1 . All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work. 2 . All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected (ringed with haybales or equal ) . 3 . The access drive shall be watered for dust control during hauling operations to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel onto John Fitch Boulevard. If this appears to be ineffective in controlling the dust, a liquid emulsion/tackifier shall be used. r Arthur Silvestri Page Two June 3, 1993 Application #92-34P Public Works 1 . Four complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by Planning Department along with plans developer needs . Only approved plans are to be used on jobsite. 2 . The Public Works Department is to be notified forty-eight (48 ) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist requested for the following: a) After site is staked out b) All drainage work 3 . As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers located as per revised as-built checklist. 4 . All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 5 . Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Art Silvestri in the field. 6 . Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in triplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours . 7 . Normal hours of operation 7 :00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. , no work on Sunday. 8 . Mylar to go on file prior to commencement of work. 9 . Planning & Zoning approval on expires November 10, 1994 10 . IWA/CC expires on October 5, 1995 SNET/NU 1 . Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. 1 Arthur Silvestri Page Three June 3, 1993 Application #92-34P IWA/CC 1 . Two copies of the final plans must be submitted to the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation- Commission. 2 . A specific phase by phase grading plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Town Staff prior to advancing into each subsequent phase. Police Department 1 . Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to the Police Department on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building(s ) after construction emergency numbers must be provided to the Police Department. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lip Assistant Planner/Analyst MAB/pmm cc: Gerald Lewis, SWPD Mel Stead, Public Works John R. Collins, Chief Building Official �S0WN SF4` a TO-U'An aps-o�A ?0� .c1 U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONK. 06074 R•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 2, 1994 Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: re: Expiring Letters of Credit Re: Application #87-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company Application #92-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter(s) of Credit: Project(s) Bank Amount Expiration EAST HARTFORD SAND SOWIND $ 5,000 05/25/94 EAST HARTFORD SAND SOWIND $ 20,000 05/25/94 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning MAB/pmm oWN 8f4< G � U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 sox•co�'�w AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 30, 1994 Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: Expiring Letters of Credit Application #92-34P, East Hartford Sand & Gravel We have not as yet received any renewals of the letters of credit which expire on May 25, 1994 as noted in our previous renewal request of March 2, 1994. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the April 26, 1994 agenda of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and calling of the letter of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal . Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, �- Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning MAB/pmm �P�oW N Sf 4` C # ' ye 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WiNDSOR, CONN. 06074 9 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 SOR•Co . September 16 , 1994 Peter DeMallie Design Professionals , Inc . 441C Governor' s Highway South Windsor, Ct 06074 Dear Mr. DeMallie: Re: Application #87-467, East Hartford Sand & Gravel At the September 14 , 1994 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved a three year extension of application #87-467 with all original and standard conditions . Application #87-467 expires on October 16 , 1997 . Very truly yours , INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISS;SION Eliz2eth A. Warren, Chairman EAW/pmm cc: Planning & Zoning Commission Town Engineer �10 VIN ?v. r F G � v s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 dSOR•CO� March 30, 1995 Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: Re: Appl #92-34P Expiring Letter of Credit The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: Projects Bank Amount Expiration E. Hartford Sand So Windsor $5, 000 05/25/95 E. Hartford Sand So Windsor $20, 000 05/25/95 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach, AICP Director of Planning MAB/pmm Town - g S-Oum Vzou&ot c u I.fi � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �r C, _ tOSOR-GOC AREA CODE 860/644-2511 March 1, 1996 Arthur Silvestri East Hartford Sand & Gravel Company 14 Gilman Street East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Silvestri: Re: A vl. #92-34P Expiring piringLetter of Credit Credit The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: Projects Bank Amount Expiration E. Hartford Sand So Windsor $5,000 05/25/96 E. Hartford Sand So Windsor $20,000 05/25/96 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach, AICP Director of Planning MAB/pmm r I --a• •� ,/ >��...1.�, I[_ �.r.....�. - <. � ,� it WMAIM"MR �1�11�—..r." .�. r.A.. � • d/11�1�11P��.�A�I.Iw..i�.���L.� ..- I.,O-mmrl F. am x MA IWAIRM= wj 1 l I 74 •¢ 9i % a / ® !iiiw;,�1C S ,! ski' r_i .rm.. ...,ten,,:., d.- ;: �►�.�i� <�as•.re�r_ -..s�L,�'�t��r�,�LA..4 ,"_ ,L �s�.L" ' WAPA .,•. V A A . 4�, 11 li �� ,, � ( , s y � � �. �o � � �� �' :� � w � �� �< � ��� •� v • t � r �� � �. � � \ � � t \ � ,� 1 � � � � � \� � �� f � � � '" ® �� 'j � � 1 � �:/ .,,, ,. �� � � � � . ,� �� ! �, � � � � � � ., �� � '1 �' � � t �� � ® � � � � �, . ` ` �. �r��iwirrir rwrrrr..�rir.rr�rr ��yrr�rr�w r�r�r.r�rrri. ��rrnrry ....rri..wrrwr.`�r�rrrrrr,.�rvr. er..�rro.r. �+r+�irrrirrr�.r�.r,�rrri rrr��..rr►rr■ <�',