HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Plan - PZC TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR R E GE-1 V E D
PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
APPLICATION FORM � 9
aU 9
Application No:
Official Receipt Date:
soot
Receipt No: "', to , DEPZ.
jarr
APPLICANT: Maneeley' s Banquet Facility,L.L.C.
ADDRESS: 26 Schweir Road,South Windsor,CT 06074
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: D & L Caron,L.L.C.
ADDRESS: 359 Burnham Street, East Hartford,CT 06028
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: west side of Rye Street south of Commerce Way
ASSESSOR'S MAP# 121 PARCEL# 15 & 24 ZONE I
NAME, ADDRESS, TEL& FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED:
Peter R. DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc. , 165 S. Satellite Road, -
South Windsor,CT 06074 Tel . 291-8755 , Fax 291-8757
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply):
❑ Zone Change to (Public Hearing required and Certified letter to abutters required)
Subdivision/Resubdivision ❑ Open.Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required)
❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor ❑ Major
Resubdivision (Public Hearing Required) Minor ❑ Major
❑ Conditional Approval
❑ Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing, Certified letter to abutters required)
Site Plan of Development .
❑ General Plan of Development
❑ Earth Filling (Sec. 15) and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 14 - Public Hearing required)
❑ Regulation Amendment: ❑ Zoning ❑ Subdivision (Attach proposed amendment)
Temporary and Conditional Permit for
❑ Major Home Occupation for
❑ Other (explain in detail)
An Application Pending sign is required to be posted on the property for all applications ten (10) days
prior to being heard by the Commi ion.
Sign Kt of Applicant Signature of Prop rty O er
L
(See reverse side for additional information)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST
REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS
APPLICANT r "
PROJECT NAME Sit � r:
This checklist must be sian?d by plan preparer (P.E./L.S.)-declaring that all required information is
provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items-$=1-J�;y quired where appropriate.
Check mark for each item supplied.
1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information:
a. Name, address and telephone of applicant.
b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer.
c. Name of Development.
d. Date when drawings were made.
2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet, which can be used as an
overlay on Metropolitan District Maps. This map will show the overall design of the
Development and surrounding property within 500 feet.
a. Date block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage,
acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc.
b. Layout of buildings.
C. Layout of streets and parking.
d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows.
e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows.
f. Names of surrounding property owners.
g. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas.
h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties.
7LS 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklist for Architecture and Design Review.
_ 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on
either of the following size sheets: (1) 24" x 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x
24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data:
a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at
all property angle points and shown on map.
b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking
spaces.
-78 _ 7-D
c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations.
d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and
dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened).
e. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose.
f. Names of abutting property owners.
g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of
curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission
points, or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall
be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The
accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer.
h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated.
i. A-2 certification; P.E./L.S. Seal.
'Y,, 5. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding
24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of
the plot plans show the following:
a. All existing and proposed buildings.
b. Curb Lines and pavement width, sidewalks.
X c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers.
d. Existing and proposed water and gas main systems.
e. Present wooded area indicated b foliage lines. An individual trees to be saved
should be shown. y g y
f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals, but
in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot
elevations.
g. Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present.
X h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes,
lengths and sizes of pipes. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300
feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches.
A114- i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed.
x j. Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits.
X k. A-2 Certification; .P.E./L.S. Seal.
7�5 6. Landscaping plan:
75 7. Drainage calculations: - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines.
75 8. Traffic Report:
- 2 -
IV14 9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile
paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not
exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following:
a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile.
b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage.
c. Sight line at driveway & street intersections.
d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show
all tangent grade and all vertical curve information.
e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all
invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to
material.
f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of
this brook will be shown to determine conditions.
g. Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these
controls. The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices,
determine the accessibility of these controls.
h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, sizes,
lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be
shown.
kL 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for
open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map
shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet.
11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the
final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The
report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems; the report
should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points:
a. General nature and development of surrounding area.
b. Topography and natural drainage pattern.
— c. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption
characteristics, ground water level conditions, ledge rock, and general nature of soil.
d. General description of type of development contemplated.
e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes
for various ground conditions, materials to be used, and the general layout pattern to
be used, etc.
f. Special precautions that.may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the
proposed disposal systems.
g. map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout.
h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers.
- 3 -
i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4.13.5.
All information required above is included in this application at the time of submission.
PLAN 7P.E. DATE
May 17, 1995
- 4 -
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS
SUBDIVISIONS/RESUBDMSIONS
APPLICANT
i
PROJECT NAME
This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E/L.S) declaring that all required information
is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied.
Subdivision
Minor Regular
I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION
A. General Information
1. Appl. & owner name, address x x
2. Engineer& land surveyor name, address, license no.
&seal x x
3. Key map at 1" = 100'scale showing location of tract
with reference to surrounding properties, streets,
municipal boundaries, etc., within 500'. Key map
must include: x x
a. Outline of buildings.
b. Layout of streets
c. Surrounding property boundaries-within 500
feet.
d. Names of abutting property owners.
e. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas.
f. Driveway cuts on abutting properties and any
properties across from proposed site
Subdivision
Minor Regular
g. Distance to and name of nearest intersection
street.
_ 4. A schedule of.required and provided zoning district
requirements including lot area, lot frontage, lot
depth,yard setbacks, open space. variances granted,
etc.
x x
5. North arrow and scale. x x
k 6. Appropriate certification block. x x
7. Date of original drawing and all revisions. x x
_ 8. Name of development. x x
B. Plot plan at I" = 40'scale an standard 18"x 24' or 24"x
36"sheets with a 1/2"n ruled margin containing the
following data. Developments which require more than
two 24" x 36" sheets may submit the plot plan at 1"
100' scale. x x
1. Metes and bounds description showing dimensions,
bearings, curve data, length of tangents, radii, arcs,
chords, and central angles for all centerlines and
rights-of-way, and centerline curves on streets.
Monuments are,.required at comers and angles of all
new streets and new street lines, at all points of
curvature and tangency, and at critical comers and
angles of all new Town open space. Coordinates for
monuments shall be in tabular form. x x
2. CGS datum shall be used on all subdivisions
accessible to controls. The Town Engineer shall
determine the accessibility of these controls.
3. Lot layout numbers, square footage of all lots, and
all lot dimensions. Iron pins are required at all
property angle points. No lots shall be divided on 2
sheets. x x
_ 4. Yard setbacks dimensioned. x x
5. Easements, noting grantors, grantees and purpose. x x
r
Subdivision
Minor Regular
8. Proposed utility infrastructure plans, including
sanitary sewer. water, storm water management. * x
9. Spot and finished elevations at all property
comers, comers of all structures or dwellings,
or proposed first floor elevations x x
10. Construction details (per standard specs.) * x
11. Road and paving cross-sections (per, standard
specs). * x
12. Proposed street names. x x
7F2� 13. Landscape plan and details. x x
14. Site identifications signs, traffic control signs, and
directional signs. * x
15. Sight triangles at new road intersections. * x
16. Sight triangles at driveway entrance x x
(where there may be a question)..
17. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns (less
detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan,
and general plan of development. * x
III . Plans and profiles (1"= 40'horizontally
and 1" = 4'vertically) showing the following: x
a. Layout of streets in sections
coordinated by stations with the profile. x
b. Street plan showing roadways,
drainage, and partial lot lines x
Subdivision
/ Minor Regular
6. Development phasing, if proposed. x x
- 7. Names of abutting property.owners. x x
8. Proposed street names (use approved list of
names). x x
9. All open space reserved for common
or public uses. x x
A 10. Appropriate A-2 certification & LS seals. x x
H Topographic map at same scale as plot plan containing all
data included on the plot plan plus the following:
All existing structures, streets, wetlands and existing
watercourses, or other environmentally structs
sensitive areas, including enough data streets x
beyond property boundaries to allow a wetinds
reasonable evaluation of the property's fldpin
ecological relationship to surrounding
areas, 100 yr. floodplain. x
�2. Existing and proposed contours to extend a x
sufficient amount beyond subject
property, to determine the effects on the property
as follows (town mapping): 100' x
up to 3% grade: 1'contour interval
3% grade &over; 2'contour interval
3. Boundary limits, nature, and extent of
wooded areas, specimen trees, and other
significant physical features. x x
4. Existing system of drainage of subject site
and of any larger tract or basin of which
it is a part(can use Town stormwater x x
study).
-TPA 5. Drainage area map. * - x
-7- 5 6. Drainage calculations * x
7. Perc test data, preliminary indication of septic
system feasibility if individual sanitary * x.
sewerage systems provided.
�jL �v�v d?EO
Subdivision
Minor Regular
c. Profile of roadway showing existing and
finished grades, all tangent grades, and all
vertical curve information x
d. Profile will show all catch basins and all
drainage lines between catch basins with all
invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage
pipe material to be described. x
e. Typical/critical cross-sections where grading is
outside street right-of-way or is at street right-
of-way. x
f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into
an existing brook, sufficient profile of this
brook will be shown to determine conditions. x
g. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and
manholes, including pipe material, elevations,
sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of
foundation elevations for habitable buildings
shall be shown. * x
15. Traffic report(by traffic engineer)
16. Open space site improvement plan.
x
17. Architectural elevations/information per Sect. 4.20
of the zoning regulations
* - if required by Town Engineer
ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION AT THE TIME
OF SUBMISSION.
57
Date
Plan Pr pare PE/LS
June 18, 1998
47 Wil b koLife J k9--e C)VIIV 0-�;_�-
MANEELEY RESUBDIVISION/SITE PLAN
l. Application for a resubdivision to create two lots and site plan of
development for property located on the northwesterly side of Rye Street,
northerly side of Sullivan Ave and southerly of Commerce Way, I zone.
The resubdivision part of this application requires this public hearing.
2. The proposed lots are in excess of 5 acres each; 20,000 sq ft required.
Both lots exceed the lot frontage requirements, and it appears that all
other subdivision requirements have been met. Public water and sewer
are available for both lots. Prior to actual development of either lot, site
plan approval from this Commission is required.
3. The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 16,500+ square foot
facility on lot 42A. The proposed building will contain an area for the
processing of catered products, an office area and a 6,000 sq ft banquet
facility. These uses are being proposed under Section 6.1.2.7. This
��ws
section relates to permitted uses in the industrial zone and 49 any
other industrial uses except those specifically regulated as Special
Exception uses under section 6.1.3, when authorized by the Commission. ` ► ���'�+`"'�
V,,Ap ` &J—In determining the appropriateness of the use, the Commission shall
consider the criteria listed under section 6.1.3.
Criteria include:
♦ The goals and objectives of the Plan of Development are met;
♦ Adverse traffic impacts are not created;
♦ Negative impacts on property values are not created;
♦ The land is physically suited for its proposed use;
♦ Adverse environmental impacts are not created;
♦ There is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community
need;
♦ Present and proposed utilities, streets, drainage system, and other
improvements have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed
use
♦ Historic factors are adequately protected; and
♦ The overall physical appearance of the development is compatible
with surrounding development and the Commission's goals for the
neighborhood.
4.FThl-eappl', ece' ed a variance to ec ' n .12 b from the Z mg
and of eal on July 7, 1998. T 's section `prohibits t s e
ex\ a e of s ' ituous and alcoh is li ors.,,, f cons do
or o erwise"%i e proposed se is in an '' dustrial zo e. The Z
c dit i ne eir appr al n the PZC site p a p val of thi spe 'fi
Ian. ((
5. The building coverage is 6%; 50% allowed and the impervious coverage POI
t is 54%; 65% allowed.
6. This site will be accessed primarily from an entrance on Rye Street.
There will also be a gravel access drive onto Commerce Way, which will
primarily serve the M �0
. y` r' part of the operation, but which can
also serve as an additional outlet for large events. e affic r port
icates t exis ;ng lfvels of sere' e will bej,m i ta' e at e
ir� ersectio bf o S het a u i an ve� aft r o r i the
banquet;facili�ty, witfi tf�e os i e epti . f Sat d y a peak
ho t th ong sio f a 1 r e cticSH. large e nt a e p fence
at `por dkreas n th vel of s vi e for vehi les making a left
turn from Rye Stree onto ullivan Avenu�.
. Th' si e itself does meet the 7oh
Ids for State T ffic Comm' sion
p rm' ; however, 'nc the entirFitch Indus 'a ark had b the
re ent of a evio s STC it, he applic 's t affic en g' eer
con acted C to d termi wheth r this s' woul be co idere an
ext nsi of the origin site, poss bly r quiring a er ' At ism
un er anding th a S C indicated th the site w be treated a anew
sit thus no perm is required unt' the threshol are exceeded.
8. The required parking for the uses is 157 spaces, the applicant has
provided 199 spaces.
9. �k� tom' p� $ e�iwiw�rl i t e eg site" l�n4s-area
The IWA/CC approved the application on 8/17/98 with the
recommendation of a $5,000 erosion and sedimentation bond and no
unusual approval conditions. The IWA/CC did forward a memorandum
to this Commission regarding the subject application: (READ MEMO)
10. rab� vai��be pie. WPCA
approval is required. Fred Shaw, Sup't of Pollution Control notes that
there is a sewer assessment that will be due.
I LArchitecture and Design Review Committee has reviewed the plans on
8/13/98. The Committee had the following comments:
1) The cupola proposed should be 10' wide (architectural shows '
69)
2) All mechanical equipment on the roof should be located toward
the rear of the building
3) Additional shrubs should be added under the tree canopy in the
entrance drive
4) The plan should include a maintenance plan for the burning
bush hedge to ensure that the hedge is properly maintained for
screening of the parking area
5) Additional lighting should be added to the parking area south of
the building to ensure adequate lighting
6) The sign detail should be submitted to this Committee for
review
12.If this application is approved, the planning department has no additional
approval modifications.
MEMO
From:
To: Town Clerk, Town of South Windsor
Date:
Subject: Disqualification
By means of this memorandum, I am disqualifying myself from any/all participation in matters
concerning:
Application No.
Name of Project /��r,//�� C��PG/�/ — ���"Lihi/n-A,�y �iJGssia�✓
Reason for Disqualification
5 �1�,v�'ss c
C
Commissioner and/or
Councillor
memo....memo....memo....memo....memo....memo....memo....memo....memo
9K-Ccl 9 �w
PRE CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS ***** SIGN IN SHEET �Y S
NAME COMPANY ADDRESS TELEPHONE #
FS-&ow
—
57
Ow b-IDs /T
r i od i'c� DS B�u ,Fe� Gr
eel� Z to�cZ Z-
2 �e� C�r7ee
ti g
July 10, 1998
Applicant: Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC
26 Schweir Rd.
SouthWindsor, CT 06074
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Bruce A. Maneeley, hereby authorize, Peter R. DeMallie & Design
Professionals, Inc. to serve as my agent for any land use applications for the Rye St.
Project.
Sincerely,
Bruce A_ Maneeley
July 10, 1998
Applicant: D& L Caron, LLC
359 Burnham St..
East Hartford, CT 06028
To Whom It May Concern:
D&L Caron, LLC, hereby authorize, Peter R. DeMallie & Design Professionals,
Inc. to serve as my agent for any land use applications for the Rye St. Project.
Sincerely,
/ Darrell R.Chaloult
Traffic Engineering Solutions,P.C.
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033
(860) 657-3579
' August 4, 1998
Bruce Maneeley
' Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC
26 Schweir Road
' South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Maneeley:
' Traffic Engineering Solutions, P.C. is pleased to submit the findings of our Traffic
Impact Study for the proposed Banquet and Catering Facility on Rye Street in South
' Windsor, Connecticut. If you have any questions during your review of the attached
report, please call me.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project.
' Very truly yours,
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, P.C.
AA
Bruce A. Hillson, P.E.
Enclosure
1
' c:\business\schein\windsor\Rr0721.doc
1
1
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
1
1
for
BANQUET AND CATERING FACILITY
1
PROPOSED FOR RYE STREET
by
MANEELEY S BANQUET FACILITY, LLC
1
1
1
Prepared B
P Y
Traffic Engineering Solutions
1 193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, Connecticut
' (860) 657-3579
August 1998
i
Table of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................1
ExistingConditions.................................................................................................2
' Roadways............................................................................................................2
Signalized Intersections.......................................................................................3
f1998 Traffic Volumes ..........................................................................................3
Accidents.............................................................................................................4
ProjectGenerated Traffic .......................................................................................4
CapacityAnalyses...................................................................................................5
SiteAccess..............................................................................................................9
Conclusions...........................................................................................................10
' List of Tables
' Table 1 Trip Generation - Banquet and Catering Facility....................................5
Table 2 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses ............................................7
' Table 3 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses ........................................8
Table 4 Available Intersection Sight Distances vs. ConnDOT
Guidelines................................................................................................................9
' CAB US INESSWANEELEY\REPO RT.DOC I
' Introduction
Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC. proposes to build a 16,516 square foot
' Banquet and Catering Facility on 5.44 acres located along the north side of
Rye Street in South Windsor, Connecticut. This report was prepared by
Traffic Engineering Solutions to address the traffic impact on roadways and
' intersections surrounding the project. The following scope of work was
included in this study:
■ Making turning movement counts during the Friday evening (5:30 PM
to 7:30 PM) and Saturday afternoon (3:00 PM to 5:00 PM) peak
periods of Banquet Facility traffic at the following intersections:
0 Commerce Way at Sullivan Avenue (Route 194);
0 Rye at Sullivan Avenue;
0 Sullivan Avenue at John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5);
■ Obtaining from the Town of South Windsor traffic accident data for
the latest three year period for Rye Street and Commerce Way in the
vicinity of the site;
■ Obtaining from ConnDOT traffic accident data for the latest three
year period for Sullivan Avenue between Route 5 and the railroad
crossing east of Rye Street, and for Route 5 at its intersection with
Sullivan Avenue;
■ Obtaining from the Connecticut DOT 24-hour traffic counts for
Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of Rye Street;
' ■ Making Visual Observations of roadways and land use conditions
along Rye Street and Commerce Way;
■ Determining the number of trips expected to be added to the
roadway system by the proposed 16,516 square foot Banquet and
Catering Facility which includes a banquet hall, kitchen, office and
storage;
■ Completing Friday evening and Saturday afternoon peak period
capacity analyses for the intersections listed above and for the site
drive intersection with Rye Street to determine existing operating
Levels of Service (LOS) and the anticipated LOS for the traffic
' volumes expected upon completion of the Banquet and Catering
Facility;
' ■ Field measuring the intersection and stopping sight distances in both
directions along Rye Street from the location of the proposed access
drive and comparing these distances with the Connecticut DOT
Guidelines for Intersection and Stopping Sight Distances for the
' posted speed limit, as well as speeds 5 and 10 miles per hour
greater than the posted speed limit;
■ Identifying and recommending improvements, if required, to correct
deficiencies found during the study;
' C:IBUSINES SWAN EELEYIREPORT.DOC 1
Existing Conditions
' A 16,516 square foot Banquet and Catering Facility capable of seating 400
people is proposed for a 5.44 acre site located along the north side of Rye
Street in South Windsor, Connecticut. A total of 199 parking spaces,
1 including six handicap spaces, will be provided to serve the needs of the
banquet facility. The site has approximately 555 feet of frontage along Rye
Street and is located about midway between Sullivan Avenue and
Commerce Way. The property is presently undeveloped. Access to the site
will be provided by a single drive located near the center of the site, and
approximately 580 feet easterly of Sullivan Avenue. Visual observations
' were made and traffic counts obtained for the roadways and intersections
surrounding the site.
' Roadways
Rye Street runs from northeast to southwest with one lane in each direction.
The roadway is 24 to 25 feet wide and has a double yellow centerline
separating the two directions of travel. Rye Street begins at Sullivan
Avenue at its westerly end and continues easterly and northeasterly for
approximately two miles where it crosses the Town Line and continues into
the Town of East Windsor. The easterly end of Commerce Way intersects
Rye Street about 460 feet east of the proposed site access drive. The Rye
Street approach to Sullivan Avenue is STOP sign controlled. Land use
along Rye Street in the vicinity of the site is a mixture of commercial,
industrial and agricultural uses. There are also parcels of land that remain
wooded and unused. These parcels are located along the northerly side of
' Rye Street west of the site and east of Commerce Way. The posted speed
limit on Rye Street is 35 miles per hour.
Sullivan Avenue runs from the northwest to the southeast. It begins at Main
Street, about 500 feet westerly of Route 5, and continues southeasterly and
southerly for about 4.2 miles to its intersection with Ellington Road (Route
30). Rye Street intersects Sullivan Avenue from the east about 1,200 feet
' southeast of Route 5. The road varies in width and number of lanes
between its intersection with Route 5 (John Fitch Boulevard) and just
southeast of Rye Street. Along this section, Sullivan Avenue typically has
' two lanes in each direction. A third lane in the northwest direction is added
to the Sullivan Avenue approach at the Route 5 intersection to provide an
exclusive left turn lane, a combination left and through lane and an exclusive
' right turn lane. The two lanes in the southeast direction proceed through the
intersection with Rye Street where one lane is dropped and the roadway
tapers to provide a single lane in the southeast direction. Approaching Rye
' Street from the southeast, Sullivan Avenue has a single lane in the
northwest direction. The second lane in the northwest direction is added at
the Rye Street intersection. The travel lanes on Sullivan Avenue are 11 feet
wide and there are four foot shoulders along both sides of the roadway. A
double yellow center line separates the two directions of travel on Sullivan
Avenue, white lane lines define the travel lanes in each direction, and solid
white edge lines delineate the shoulder areas. The posted speed limit on
Sullivan Avenue is 40 miles per hour.
' C:\BUSINESSWANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 2
Signalized Intersections
Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) at John Fitch Boulevard (Route 5) is a
signalized 4 legged intersection with Route 5 running north to south and
Sullivan Avenue running northwest to southeast. There are two through
' lanes in each direction on Route 5. Additionally, Route 5 has a left turn lane
and right turn lane in the northbound direction, and two left turn lanes in the
southbound direction. The westerly leg of Sullivan Avenue has a single lane
approaching the intersection, and the easterly leg has three lanes
approaching the intersection; a left turn lane, a combination through and left
turn lane and a right turn lane. A semi-quad signal operation is provided at
' this intersection. The controller allows several combinations of non-
conflicting traffic movements to flow at the same time along Route 5. These
combinations include north and southbound left turns when vehicles are
present in the turn lanes along both approaches. If the left turning volume in
one direction is nonexistent or lower than the opposite direction, the heavier
left turn is allowed to continue in combination with the through movement
' along the same approach; once the left turns have been served, the through
movements in both directions are allow to proceed. Each Sullivan Avenue
approach has its own phase. This intersection is included with thirteen other
locations in a ConnDOT Closed Loop Signal System for Route 5.
1998 Traffic Volumes
Twenty-four hour automatic traffic recorder(ATR) counts were obtained
from the Connecticut DOT for Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) in the vicinity of
Rye Street. The ConnDOT counts, made in February and March 1995, were
' supplemented by Friday evening (5:30 PM to 7:30 PM) and Saturday
afternoon (3:00 PM to 5:00 PM) turning movement counts made during July
1998 for this study at the following intersections:
■ Sullivan Avenue at Rye Street;
■ Sullivan Avenue at Commerce Way;
■ Sullivan Avenue at Route 5;
According to the ConnDOT counts, the daily traffic volume traveling Sullivan
Avenue is 12,800 vehicles per day (vpd) between Route 5 and Rye Street
' and 10,600 vpd southeast of Rye Street. The turning movement counts
indicate that the Friday evening peak hour of traffic on Sullivan Avenue
between Route 5 and Rye Street occurs between 5:30 PM and 6:30 PM
when 908 vehicles traveled the roadway (403 vehicles traveling northwest
' toward Route 5 and 505 vehicles traveling southeast toward Rye Street).
The Saturday afternoon peak hour along the same section of Sullivan
Avenue occurred between 3:30 PM and 4:30 PM when 730 vehicles traveled
Sullivan Avenue (349 vehicles toward the northwest and 381 vehicles
toward the southeast. The peak hours of traffic on Rye Street coincided
with the peak hours on Sullivan Avenue. During the Friday evening peak
hour 209 vehicles traveled Rye Street in the vicinity of the site (78
westbound toward Sullivan Avenue and 131 eastbound); and during the
Saturday afternoon peak hour 141 vehicles traveled Rye Street (84
' C:\BUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 3
westbound and 57 eastbound). The July 1998 turning movement counts are
included in the appendix to this report.
Accidents
' The Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) Bureau of
Planning and Research compiles records of accident data reported by
investigating police authorities. Accidents which result in death, injury, or
' property damage in excess of$1,000 are required to be reported. Accident
data was obtained for Sullivan Avenue from Route 5 to the railroad crossing
east of Rye Street including the intersections with Route 5, Commerce Way
' and Rye Street. The accident data covered the latest three-year period for
which records are available, April 1, 1994 to March 31, 1997. During the
three years covered by the ConnDOT accident data a total of 30 accidents
were reported along this half mile section of Sullivan Avenue. Eighteen of
the reported accidents occurred on Sullivan Avenue at its intersection with
Route 5. There were 6 accidents at the intersection with Rye Street during
the three-year period. Four of the six accidents occurred on the Rye Street
' approach to Sullivan Avenue, and three of these involved one vehicle hitting
the rear of a second vehicle waiting to enter the flow of traffic on Sullivan
' Avenue. The ConnDOT accident data also indicates that there were 21
accidents during the three year period on Route 5 at its intersection with
Sullivan Avenue.
The South Windsor Police Department provided accident information for
Rye Street and Commerce Way. According to the Town's records there
were 5 accidents along Rye Street from Sullivan Avenue to George Street
' between January 1995 and June 1998. During the same three and one-half
year period there were 3 reported accidents along the length of Commerce
Way.
' The ConnDOT Bureau of Planning and Research also assembles the
reported accidents on State roadways and compiles the accidents in a report
entitled Traffic Accident Surveillance Report (TASR). The TASR is used to
' prioritize accident sites statewide. A second list, the Suggested List of
Surveillance Study Sites (SLOSSS), is a listing of locations which offer the
greatest promise of accident reduction resulting from implementation of
' corrective action. The most recent TASR and SLOSSS cover the period
from 1993 to 1995. The intersection of Sullivan Avenue and Route 5 is
included in the TASR list as having accident rates above normal and is
assigned the sequence (priority) number of 427 out of 1381 locations
included in the SLOSSS list for further review and potential improvements.
This intersection was reviewed under an earlier edition of the SLOSSS and
the traffic signal was revised in 1995 under State Project No. 132-116.
' Project Generated Traffic
New trips to the roadway system generated by a proposed development are
typically determined from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
reference, Trip Generation'. The ITE reference has established
' 1 Trip Generation Sixth Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997.
' C:\BUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 4
mathematical relationships for calculating trip generation rates based on
studies of various land uses nationwide and published these generation
relationships in the Trip Generation reference. However, the ITE Trip
Generation contains no information relating to Banquet and Catering
Facilities. Staff at the Bureau of Policy and Planning for the Connecticut
' Department of Transportation have determined that the number of trips
generated by a Banquet Facility is 0.4 trips per seat with 90 percent of the
trips either entering or leaving the facility during the peak hour of trip
' generation. The direction of travel (entering or leaving) is dependent on
whether an event at the facility is beginning or ending.
' Trip generation estimates were calculated for the proposed Banquet and
Catering Facility using the ConnDOT Trip Generation information, and the
results are summarized in Table 1. For the Friday evening event it was
assumed that all 400 seats would be used and the event would begin in the
' early evening. For the Saturday afternoon calculations it was assumed that
one event with 400 people would be ending and a second event with 400
people would be starting during the peak hour. This assumption provides a
worst case condition that will not likely occur since Maneeley's staff will need
time to prepare the Banquet Facility for a second event.
' Table 1 -Trip Generation - Banquet and Catering Facility
Trips Entering Trips Leaving
' Friday Evening Peak
144 16
Hour
Saturday Afternoon
Peak Hour 160 160
Capacity Analyses
Capacity Analyses were done to determine the existing and anticipated
quality of traffic operations on surrounding intersections and roadways.
Letter designations from A to F are used to represent the Levels of Service
(LOS) for the traffic operation at each intersection or roadway, with LOS A
representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the lowest. Typically,
LOS D is considered acceptable by ConnDOT for design peak hour
conditions.
The Level of Service is determined differently for signalized intersections,
unsignalized intersections with multi-way STOP, and unsignalized
intersections with STOP control on the minor street approaches. For
signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections with multi-way STOP
t control, the analysis considers the operation of all traffic entering the
intersection and the LOS is determined for the overall conditions at the
intersection. For unsignalized intersections with STOP control on the minor
street, the analysis assumes that through and right-turning traffic on the
major street is not affected by traffic on the side streets. Hence, the LOS is
determined for the movements on the side street and the left-turn movement
' CABLISINESSWAN EEL EYIREPORT.DOC 5
from the major street onto the side street. Levels of Service are defined b
1 Y
the average delay per vehicle as indicated below.
' Signalized Intersections
Level of Service Avg. DelayNehicle (in Seconds)
LOSA < 5.0
LOSB > 5.0 and < 15.0
LOS C > 15.0 and < 25.0
' LOS D > 25.0 and < 40.0
LOS E > 40.0 and < 60.0
1 LOS F > 60.0
Unsignalized Intersections
Level of Service Avg. DelayNehicle (in Seconds)
LOS A < 5.0
LOS B > 5.0 and < 10.0
LOS C > 10.0 and < 20.0
LOS D > 20.0 and < 30.0
' LOS E > 30.0 and < 45.0
LOS F > 45.0
Level-of-service capacity analyses were completed for the 1998 Base Year,
1999 No-Build, and 1999 Build conditions for the intersections included in
this study, and for the year 1999 Build conditions for the site access drive on
Rye Street.
The 1999 No Build traffic volumes were determined by increasing the 1998
traffic volumes by a two percent annual growth factor to account for growth
' that may occur in the Town of South Windsor and surrounding communities.
The analyses assumed that all (100%) of the site generated traffic (entering
and leaving) would travel Rye Street between the site and Sullivan Avenue
and 25 percent would travel Rye Street east of the site. The analyses
further assumed that two-thirds of the generated trips would travel Sullivan
Avenue northwest of Rye Street, and one-third southeast of Rye Street; and
that two-thirds of the site generated trips would travel Route 5 from either
direction.
The trip generation and trip distribution assumptions made for this study
1 provide a very conservative evaluation of the impact the proposed Banquet
and Catering Facility will have on the surrounding roadways. The Results of
the signalized intersection capacity analyses are presented in Table 2 and
the unsignalized intersection capacity analyses are summarized in Table 3.
Table 2 indicates that the signalized intersection of Sullivan Avenue at
Route 5 presently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C during the Friday
evening peak hour and at LOS B during the Saturday afternoon peak hour.
The intersection will experience no change in operating Level of Service with
the 1999 No Build traffic volumes. The Levels of Service will continue to
' remain unchanged from today's LOS with the added trips generated by the
' CAB USINESSWANEELEY\REPO RT.DOC 6
' 400 seat Banquet and Catering Facility with the very conservative
q 9 Y rY
assumptions made for trip generation and trip distribution.
' Table 2: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1998 Base Year 1999 No Build 1999 Build
Location Peak V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
Hour
Route 5 @ Fri .464 16.3 C .473 16.4 C .500 17.2 C
Sullivan Avenue I Sat 1 .333 1 13.9 1 B 1 .340 1 13.9 1 B 1 .435 1 14.8 1 B
NOTES:
* Indicates a saturated condition. V/C = volume-to-capacity ratio.
LOS = Level of Service Delay = Average stopped delay, in
seconds, to all vehicles entering the intersection.
Table 3 shows the results of the analyses for the unsignalized intersections
of Rye Street at the site drive, Rye Street at Sullivan Avenue and Sullivan
Avenue at Commerce Way. The analyses were completed for each existing
intersection for the 1998 traffic volumes, 1999 No Build traffic volumes and
1999 Build traffic volumes, and for the site drive intersection with Rye Street
for the 1999 Build traffic volumes. The analyses indicate that the
intersection of Sullivan Avenue at Commerce Way is expected to experience
no change from the existing operating Level of Service for the 1999 No Build
and 1999 Build traffic volumes. The Left turns from Sullivan Avenue onto
Commerce Way will continue at LOS A during the Friday evening and
Saturday afternoon peak hours and the Commerce Way approach will
continue to operate at LOS B during the Friday evening peak hour and at
LOS A during the Saturday afternoon Peak hour with the additional traffic
from the proposed Banquet and Catering Facility. At the Sullivan Avenue
intersection with Rye Street the left turns from Sullivan Avenue are expected
to continue to operate at LOS A during the Friday evening and Saturday
afternoon peak hours with the addition of the site generated traffic, including
traffic from two full-capacity events (one beginning and the other ending)
during the Saturday afternoon peak hour. The Rye Street approach to
Sullivan Avenue presently operates at LOS B during both periods analyzed
and will continue at LOS B during the Friday evening peak hour. During the
Saturday afternoon peak hour the Rye Street Approach is expected to
operate at LOS D with an average delay of 20.3 seconds per vehicle if two
1 major events occur back to back. Since the threshold separating LOS C and
LOS D is 20.0 seconds delay per vehicle, two smaller events or a single
large event occuring during the Saturday afternoon peak will allow the Rye
Street approach to operate at LOS C.
The intersection of Rye Street at the site drive was analyzed for the 1999
Build traffic volumes. Left turns from Rye Street onto the site are expected
to operate at LOS A during both peak periods. The site drive is also
expected to operate at LOS A during the Friday evening and Saturday
afternoon peak hours. The Saturday peak period analysis included traffic
' from two major events impacting the drive at the same time.
' CABUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 7
Table 3: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
p Y Y
1998 1999 No Build 1999 Build
Location Peak Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
Hour
Rye Street at the Banquet&
Catering Facility Site Drive Fri PM 1.2
' E-Bd Left Turn Fri PM 2.7 A
S-Bd Site Drive 3.9 A
tRye Street at the Banquet& Sat PM 2.6
Catering Facility Site Drive
E-Bd Left Turn Sat PM 2.8 A
S-Bd Site Drive 4.9 A
Rye Street at Sullivan Fri PM 1.0 1.0 1.6
Avenue
SE-Bd Left Turn Fri PM 3.6 A 3.7 A 4.5 A
W-Bd Rye Street 5.7 B 5.8 B 8.1 B
Rye Street at Sullivan Sat PM 0.8 0.8 5.3
Avenue
SE-Bd Left Turn Sat PM 3.1 A 3.1 A 3.7 A
W-Bd Rye Street 5.4 B 5.5 B 20.3 D2
Sullivan Avenue at Fri PM 0.1 0.1 0.1
Commerce Way
SE-Bd Left Turn Fri PM 3.7 A 3.8 A 3.8 A
S-Bd Commerce Way 7.3 B 7.5 B 8.5 B
Sullivan Avenue at
Commerce Way Sat PM 0.1 0.1 0.1
SE-Bd Left Turn Sat PM 3.3 A 3.3 A 3.8 A
S-Bd Commerce Way 3.3 A 1 3.3 1 A 3.5 A
Delay = Average stopped delay, in seconds, to all vehicles entering the
intersection or to vehicles making the specified turn.
1
2 LOS C or better is achieved if only one major event or two smaller events with 200 attendees at each
is assumed.
' C:\BUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 8
Site Access
The proposed access drive to the site will be located along the north side of
Rye Street approximately 580 feet east of Sullivan Avenue. It is important to
provide adequate intersection sight distance (ISD) for vehicles turning left or
right from the site drive onto Rye Street to assure that they are able to safely
enter the flow of traffic. It is equally important to provide adequate stopping
sight distance (SSD) along Rye Street for drivers turning left onto the site,
and for drivers approaching from both directions along Rye Street to
observe these left turning vehicles. This sight distance allows the driver
making the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate and complete the turn
I before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a
risk. For vehicles approaching from the opposite direction along Rye Street,
the sight distance should be adequate to allow them to proceed at their
current speed without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning
vehicle, and if necessary, provide them with the time to recognize the need
to stop, react to that need, and stop before encountering the problem.
Similarly, it is important to provide adequate sight distance for vehicles
approaching the left turning vehicle from the rear to allow them to stop
before reaching the turning vehicle.
1 Visual observations and sight distance measurements were made at the
location of the site drive along Rye Street. The sight distance looking
toward the right from the site drive was found to be 580 feet (into the
intersection with Sullivan Avenue). Looking toward the left from the site
access drive, the sight distance is 1,050 feet, beyond the intersection with
George Road. The posted speed limit along Rye Street is 35 miles per hour
(mph). Table 4 presents the intersection sight distances that will be
available to drivers leaving the site, and the minimum and desirable sight
distances presented in the Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Highway Design
' for the posted speed limit and speeds of 5 and 10 miles per hour greater
than the posted speed limit.
Table 4 -Available Intersection Sight Distances vs. ConnDOT
Guidelines
Connecticut DOT Design Guidelines
Field Measured Minimum Intersection Desirable Intersection
Intersection Sight Sight Distance in Feet for Sight Distance in Feet for
Distance Design Speeds Shown Design Speeds Shown
35 40 45 35 40 45
MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH
' Looking Right 580 Feet 285 365 455 405 505 635
Looking Left 1,050 Feet 285 365 455 1 405 505 1 635
Table 4 shows that the intersection sight distance (ISD) looking in both
directions is much greater than the minimum ISD for design speeds of 45
mph (10 miles per hour greater than the posted speed limit). The ISD
looking left is nearly double the desirable ISD for a 45 mph design speed.
CABUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 9
Looking toward the right, the intersection sight distance is greater than the
1 desirable ISD for a 40 mph design speed and nearly equal to the desirable
ISD for a 45 mph design speed. Since vehicles approaching from the right
will have just turned from Sullivan Avenue onto Rye Street, their speed will
likely be close to the posted speed limit as they approach the proposed site
drive.
The stopping sight distance drivers can see is 580 feet from the west (from
Sullivan Avenue) and nearly 1,000 feet from the east. The stopping sight
distance from both directions is greater than the upper limit (475 feet) for
SSD stated in the Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Highway Design for a
' design speed of 50 mph (15 mph greater than the posted speed limit). The
available intersection and stopping sight distances will allow vehicles to
safely enter and leave the Maneeley Banquet and Catering site.
Conclusions
Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC. proposes to build a 16,516 square foot
Banquet and Catering Facility on 5.44 acres located along the north side of
Rye Street in South Windsor, Connecticut. The traffic impact from the
development was determined by using the trip generation information for
' banquet facilities provided by staff at the Bureau of Policy and Planning for
the Connecticut Department of Transportation.
Capacity analyses were done for the intersections of Sullivan Avenue at
Route 5, Sullivan Avenue at Commerce Way and Sullivan Avenue at Rye
Street for the 1998 traffic volumes, 1999 No Build traffic volumes, and the
1999 Build traffic volumes. Additionally, capacity analyses were done for
the site access drive along Rye Street for the 1999 Build conditions. Levels
of Service are expected to remain unchanged (LOS C on Friday and LOS B
on Saturday) at the signalized intersection of Sullivan Avenue and Route 5
for the existing, the 1999 No Build and 1999 Build conditions. Capacity
analyses for the unsi nalized intersections indicate that the intersection of
Y g
Sullivan Avenue at Commerce Way will experience no change in operating
Level of Service during either peak period for the existing, 1999 No Build
and 1999 Build conditions (the left turn from Sullivan Avenue will continue to
operate at LOS A during both peak periods and the Commerce Way
approach will continue to operate at LOS B during the Friday peak hour and
at LOS A during the Saturday peak hour). At Rye Street the left turns from
Sullivan Avenue onto Rye Street will continue to operate at LOS A during
the Friday evening and Saturday afternoon peak hours with the addition of
the site generated traffic, including traffic generated by two full-capacity
events during the Saturday afternoon peak hour. The Rye Street approach
to Sullivan Avenue presently operates at LOS B during both periods and will
continue at LOS B during the Friday evening peak hour. During the
Saturday afternoon peak hour the Rye Street Approach is expected to
operate at LOS D with an average delay of 20.3 seconds per vehicle if two
major events occur back to back. Since the threshold separating LOS C and
LOS D is 20.0 seconds delay per vehicle, two smaller events or a single
large event occuring during the Saturday afternoon peak will allow the Rye
Street approach to operate at LOS C.. The intersection of Rye Street and
' CABUSINESS\MANEELEY\REPORT.DOC 10
the site drive was analyzed for the 1999 Build conditions. Left turns from
Rye Street onto the site will operate at LOS A during both peak periods.
' The site drive will also operate at LOS A during both peak periods.
The available intersection and stopping sight distances will provide drivers
the opportunity to safely enter and leave the site. Except for the sight
' distance looking right from the site drive, the intersection and stopping sight
distances will meet or exceed the desirable sight distances presented in the
Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Highway Design for speeds of at least 50
' miles per hour(15 miles per hour faster than the posted 35 mph speed limit).
The intersection sight distance looking right from the site drive is greater
than the desirable ISD for a 40 mph design speed and more than 100 feet
greater than the minimum ISD for a 45 mph design speed. Since vehicles
approaching from the right will have just turned from Sullivan Avenue onto
Rye Street, their speed will likely be closer to the posted speed limit as they
approach the site drive.
Existing roadway conditions in the area are expected to handle the added
traffic generated by the 400 seat Banquet and Catering Facility. No off site
improvements are suggested as the proposed Banquet and Catering Facility
is not expected to cause unacceptable traffic operations (Levels of Service)
or safety concerns in the area.
CAB US INESSWANEELEY\REPO RT.DOC 11
x
0
Z
W
IL
a
. Q
t
1
' 1998 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Accurate Counts
N/S Street: Route 5 978-664-2565 Study Name: 39700003
E/W Street: Sullivan Avenue 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700003
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/10/98
Weather Clear Page 1
' Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
Route 5 ISullivan Ave (Route 5 (Sullivan Ave
From North IFrom East lFrom South lFrom West
Start I I I I jIntrvl.
Time I Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Total
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 17:30 on 07/10/98 to 19:15 on 07/10/98 1
Time 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 277 311 201 147 28 2291 7 432 2051 38 21 31
' Pct. 1 45.5 51.1 3.21 36.3 6.9 56.61 1.0 67.0 31.81 61.2 33.8 4.81
Total 1 608 1 404 1 644 1 62 1
High 1 17:45 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 80 82 61 51 8 661 3 143 641 14 5 11
' Total 1 168 1 125 1 210 1 20 1
PHF 1 0.904 1 0.808 1 0.766 1 0.775 1
Vehicle group 1 Route 5
Vehicle group 2 20 296 267 229
0 15 10 432
____= _____ ____= 38
20 311 277
11 699
Inbound 608
Outbound 699
' Sullivan Ave e Total 1307 222 229
55 28
' 7
28
38 0 28
38 0
' Inbound 62 Inbound 404
Outbound 55 Outbound 503 145
19 Total 117 Total 907 2 147
21 2
205
1 21 503
3 2 277
Inbound 644 Sullivan Ave
Outbound 461
Total 1105
3 7 416 194 0
311 0 16 11 0
147 =____ ____= -___- -____
7 432 205 0
461 North
Route 5
Accurate Counts
' N/S Street: Route 5 978-664-2565 Study Name: 397000A3
E/W Street: Sullivan Avenue 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700003
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/11/98
Weather : Clear Page 1
' Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
Route 5 (Sullivan Ave IRoute 5 (Sullivan Ave
From North From East IFrom South IFrom West
Start I I I I lIntrvl.
Time I Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Left Thru Right Rightl Total
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 07/11/98 to 16:45 on 07/11/98 1
Time 1 15:00 1 15:00 1 15:00 1 15:00 1
Vol. 1 239 279 211 114 19 2011 2 299 1151 20 26 21
Pct. 1 44.3 51.7 3.81 34.1 5.6 60.11 0.4 71.8 27.61 41.6 54.1 4.11
Total 1 539 1 334 1 416 1 48 1
High ( 15:30 1 15:30 1 15:30 1 15:45 1
Vol. 1 62 80 5, 39 7 45, 0 79 291 4 10 11
' Total 1 147 1 91 1 108 1 15 1
PHF 1 0.916 1 0.917 1 0.962 1 0.800 1
Vehicle group 1 Route 5
Vehicle group 2 19 276 238 201
2 3 1 299
----- ===== ===== ===== 20
' 21 279 239
520
Inbound 539
' Outbound 520
Sullivan Ave Total 1059 199
21 2 201
42 19
' 2
19
20 0 19
20 0
' Inbound 48 Inbound 334
Outbound 42 Outbound 380 111
25 Total 90 Total 714 3 114
26 1
115
2 26 380
2 0 239
Inbound 416 Sullivan Ave
Outbound 395
Total 811
' 2 2 294 112 0
279 0 5 3 0
114 ===== ===== ===== =====
2 299 115 0
' 35 North
Route 5
' Accurate Counts
N/S Street: Sullivan Avenue 978-664-2565 Study Name: 39700002
' E/W Street: Rye 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700002
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/10/98
Weather : Clear Page 1
Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
(Sullivan Ave IRye ISullivan Ave
From North IFrom East IFrom South
Start I I I lIntrvl.
Time I Left Thrul Left Right Rightl Thru Right Rightl Total
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 17:30 on 07/10/98 to 19:15 on 07/10/98
Time 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 122 3851 7 711 323 91
' Pct. 1 24.0 75.91 8.9 91.01 97.2 2.71
Total 1 507 1 78 1 332 1
High 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 45 961 2 221 95 11
' Total 1 141 1 24 1 96 1
PHF 1 0.898 1 0.812 1 0.864 1
' Vehicle group 1 Sullivan Ave
Vehicle group 2 366 121 71
19 1 323
385 122
Inbound 507
Outbound 394
1 Total 901 71
0 71
Inbound 78
Outbound 131 7
Total 209 0 7
9
122 131
' Inbound 332 Rye
Outbound 392
Total 724
385 320 9 0
392 323 9 0
North
Sullivan Ave
Accurate Counts
N/S Street: Sullivan Avenue 978-664-2565 Study Name: 397000A2
E/W Street: Rye 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700002
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/11/98
Weather : Clear Page 1
Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
' Sullivan Ave IRye (Sullivan Ave
From North IFrom East lFrom South
Start I I I lIntrvl.
Time I Left Thrul Left Right Rightl Thru Right Rightl Total
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 07/11/98 to 16:45 on 07/11/98
Time 1 15:30 1 15:30 1 15:30 1
Vol. 1 52 3221 12 721 268 51
Pct. 1 13.9 86.01 14.2 85.71 98.1 1.81
Total 1 374 1 84 1 273 1
High 1 15:30 1 15:30 1 16:15 1
Vol. 1 10 851 3 301 74 21
' Total 1 95 1 33 1 76 1
PHF 1 0.984 1 0.636 1 0.898 1
Vehicle group 1 Sullivan Ave
Vehicle group 2 322 51 72
0 1 268
_____ ____= 340
322 52
Inbound 374
Outbound 340
' Total 714 71
1 72
Inbound 84
Outbound 57 12
Total 141 0 12
5
52 57
' Inbound 273 Rye
Outbound 334
Total 607
==322 --267
====5 ====0
1
12 1 0 0
334 268 5 0
North
Sullivan Ave
' Accurate Counts
N/S Street: Commerce Way 978-664-2565 Study Name: 39700001
' E/W Street: Sullivan Avenue 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700001
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/10/98
Weather : Clear Page 1
Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
' lCommerce Way Sullivan Ave I
Sullivan Ave
From North IFrom East IFrom West
Start ( I I lIntrvl.
Time I Left Right Rightl Thru Right Rightl Left Thrul Total _
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 17:30 on 07/10/98 to 19:15 on 07/10/98
Time 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 4 121 391 61 5 5001
Pct. 1 25.0 75.01 98.4 1.51 0.9 99.01
Total 1 16 1 397 1 505 1
High 1 17:30 1 17:30 1 17:30 1
Vol. 1 0 61 112 21 1 1361
' Total 1 6 1 114 1 137 1
PHF 1 0.666 1 0.870 1 0.921 1
Vehicle group 1 Commerce Way
Vehicle group 2 12 3 6
0 1 5
12 4 11
Inbound 16
Outbound 11
Sullivan Ave Total 27 6
12 0 6
403 391
' 387
4 4 391
5 1
Inbound 505 Inbound 397
Outbound 403 Outbound 504
479 Total 908 Total 901
500 21
500
4 504
Sullivan Ave
North
Accurate Counts
N/S Street: Commerce Way 978-664-2565 Study Name: 397000AI
' E/W Street: Sullivan Avenue 860-282-0223 Site Code : 39700001
City/State: South Windsor, CT Start Date: 07/11/98
Weather Clear Page 1
Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2
lCommerce Way ISullivan Ave ISullivan Ave
From North IFrom East lFrom West
Start I I I jIntrvl.
Time I Left Right Rightl Thru Right Rightl Left Thrul Total
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 07/11/98 to 16:45 on 07/11/98
Time 15:30 1 15:30 1 15:30 1
Vol. 0 81 341 11 8 3731
Pct. 0.0 100.01 99.7 0.21 2.0 97.91
Total 8 1 342 1 381 1
High 16:00 1 15:30 1 15:30 1
Vol. 0 5, 90 0, 0 99,
' Total 5 1 90 1 99 1
PHF 0.400 0.950 1 0.962 1
' Vehicle group 1 Commerce Way
Vehicle group 2 8 0 1
0 0 8
Inbound 8
Outbound 9
Sullivan Ave Total 17 1
8 0 1
349 341
' 339
7 2 341
8 1
' Inbound 381 Inbound 342
Outbound 349 Outbound 373
372 Total 730 Total 715
373 1
' 373
373
Sullivan Ave
North
� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
' CAPACITY ANALYSES
1
1
1
1
1
1
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 07-20-1998
Traffic Engineering Solutions
' Streets : (E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst : BAH File Name: 0398PM.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Fri PM
Comment: 1998 Traffic Volumes
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 38 21 3 147 28 229 7 432 205 277 311 20
' PHF or PK15 0 .77 0 .77 0 .77 0 .74 0 .74 0 . 87 0 .58 0 .75 0 .80 0 .87 0 .84 0 .84
Lane W (ft) 15 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
t Heavy Veh 0 10 50 1 0 1 0 4 6 4 5 0
' Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
' Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 5 . 00 5 .00 4 .00 5 .00 5 .00
Prop. Share 41
' Prop. Prot .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
' Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
' NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 22 . OA 10 .OA Green 10 .OA 1 .OA 24 . OP
Yellow/AR 4 .0 4 . 0 Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 .0 7 . 0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phasecombination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
-
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---
EB LTR . 190 1709 0 .421 0 .111 25 . 0 C 25 .0 C
WB L 437 1787 0 .268 0 .244 17 . 8 C 14 .9 B
LT 449 1837 0 .265 0 .244 17 .8 C
R 657 1599 0 .402 0 .411 12 .3 B
' NB L 201 1805 0 . 060 0 .111 23 .1 C 14 .7 B
T 1056 3654 0 .569 0 .289 18 . 1 C
R 881 1524 0 .291 0 .578 6 .3 B
SB L 578 3471 0 .570 0 .167 23 .3 C 18 .2 C
TR 1235 3586 0 .337 0 .344 14 .2 B
Intersection Delay = 16 .3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 17 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .464
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 07-20-1998
Traffic Engineering Solutions
----------
Streets : (E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst : BAH File Name: 0398SAT.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Sat PM
Comment : 1998 Traffic Volumes
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 20 26 2 114 19 201 2 299 115 239 279 21
PHF or PK15 0 .80 0 . 80 0 .80 0 .72 0 .72 0 . 90 0 .50 0 .95 0 .96 0 .95 0 .82 0 .82
Lane W (ft) 15 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 3 1 1 10
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
' Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 .00 5 .00 5 . 00 4 . 00 5 . 00 5 .00
Prop. Share 41
Prop. Prot .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
I Thru Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
' NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16 .OA 8 .OA Green 9 .OA 1 .OA 23 .OP
Yellow/AR 4 .0 4 .0 Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 . 0 7 .0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---
' EB LTR 180 1797 0 .328 0 .100 22 .0 C 22 .0 C
WB L 350 1752 0 .265 0 .200 17 .6 C 14 .5 B
LT 367 1835 0 .248 0 .200 17 .5 C
R 600 1599 0 .374 0 .375 11 .9 B
' NB L 203 1805 0 .020 0 .112 20 .4 C 11 .4 B
T 1164 3725 0 .285 0 .313 13 .4 B
R 882 1568 0 .136 0 .563 5 .4 B
SB L 625 3574 0.416 0 .175 19 .2 C 14 .5 B
TR 1382 3686 0 .278 0 .375 11 .3 B
Intersection Delay = 13 .9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 17 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .333
----------------------------.-------------------------------------------
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 07-20-1998
Traffic Engineering Solutions
-----------------------------------------
' Streets : (E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst : BAH File Name: 0399PM.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Fri PM
Comment : 1999 Traffic Volumes w/ 2t Background Growth
Eastbound . Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 39 21 3 150 29 234 7 441 209 283 317 20
PHF or PK15 0 . 77 0 .77 0 . 77 0 .74 0 .74 0 .87 0 .58 0 .75 0 .80 0 .87 0 .84 0 . 84
Lane W (ft) 15 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 0 10 50 1 0 1 0 4 6 4 5 0
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (YIN) N (YIN) N (YIN) N (YIN) N
' Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 . 00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 . 00 5 .00 5 .00 4 . 00 5 .00 5 . 00
Prop. Share 41
Prop. Prot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 22 .OA 10 . OA Green 10 .OA 1 .OA 24 .OP
Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 .0 Yellow/AR 4 .0 4 .0 7 .0
' Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase-combination-order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---
EB LTR 190 1709 0 .427 0 .111 25 .1 D 25 .1 D
WB L 437 1787 0 .272 0 .244 17 .9 C 15 .0 B
LT 449 1838 0 .272 0 .244 17 .9 C
R 657 1599 0 .411 0 .411 12 .4 B
' NB L 201 1805 0 .060 0 . 111 23 .1 C 14 . 8 B
T 1056 3654 0 .581 0 .289 18 .3 C
R 881 1524 0 .296 0 .578 6 .3 B
SB L 578 3471 0 .583 0 .167 23 .5 C 18 .3 C
TR 1236 3587 0 .342 0 .344 14 .2 B
Intersection Delay = 16 .4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 17 .0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .473
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 07-20-1998
Traffic Engineering Solutions
Streets : (E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst : BAH File Name: 0399SAT.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Sat PM
Comment : 1999 Traffic Volumes w/ 2% Background Growth
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 20 27 2 116 19 205 2 305 117 244 285 21
PHF or PK15 0 .80 0 .80 0 .80 0 .72 0 .72 0 .90 0 .50 0 .95 0 .96 0 .95 0 .82 0 .82
Lane W (ft) 15 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 3 1 1 10
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (YIN) N (YIN) N (YIN) N (YIN) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 .00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 .00 5 .00 5 . 00 4 . 00 5 . 00 5 .00
Prop. Share 42
Prop. Prot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
1 Thru Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16 . OA 8 .OA Green 9 .OA 1 .OA 23 . OP
Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 .0 Yellow/AR 4 .0 4 .0 7 . 0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combination-order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ---- ---
EB LTR 180 1798 0 .339 0 .100 22 .1 C 22 .1 C
WB L 350 1752 0 .265 0 .200 17 .6 C 14 .5 B
LT 367 1834 0 .254 0 .200 17 .5 C
R 600 1599 0 .382 0 .375 12 .0 B
NB L 203 1805 0 . 020 0 .112 20 .4 C 11 .4 B
T 1164 3725 0 .290 0 .313 13 .5 B
R 882 1568 0 .138 0 .563 5 .4 B
SB L 625 3574 0 .424 0 .175 19 .3 C 14 .5 B
TR 1383 3687 0 .284 0 .375 11 .3 B
Intersection Delay = 13 .9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = . 17 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .340
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 08-04-1998
---------------------Traffic Engineering Solutions
Streets : (E-W)(E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst: BAH File Name: 0399PMF.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Fri PM
Comment . 1999 Traffic Volumes w/ Banquet and Catering Facility
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 39 21 3 131 29 245 7 441 305 379 317 20
PHF or PK15 0 .77 0 . 77 0 . 77 0 . 74 0 .74 0 . 87 0 .58 0 . 75 0 . 80 0 .87 0 .84 0 .84
Lane W (ft) 15 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
t Heavy Veh 0 10 50 1 0 1 0 .4 6 4 5 0
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 .00 4 .00 5 .00 5 . 00 4 . 00 5 . 00 5 . 00
Prop. Share 41
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 22 . OA 10 .OA Green 10 . OA 1 . OA 24 . OP
Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 . 0 Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 . 0 7 . 0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
-------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---
EB LTR 190 1709 0 .427 0 . 111 25 .1 D 25 .1 D
WB L 437 1787 0 .238 0 .244 17 . 7 C 14 .8 B
LT 450 1840 0 .249 0 .244 17 .7 C
R 657 1599 0 .431 0 .411 12 .5 B
NB L 201 1805 0 .060 0 .111 23 . 1 C 14 .1 B
T 1056 3654 0 .581 0 .289 18 .3 C
R 880 1524 0 .433 0 .578 7 . 1 B
SB L 579 3471 0 . 780 0 . 167 27 .9 D 21 .3 C
TR 1235 3587 0 .342 0 .344 14 .2 B
Intersection Delay = 17 .2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 13 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 .4f 08-04-1998
Traffic Engineering Solutions
--------------------------------
Streets : (E-W) Sulivan Avenue (N-S) Route 5
Analyst: BAH File Name: 0399SATF.HC9
Area Type: Other 7-15-98 Sat PM
Comment : 1999 Traffic Volumes w/ Banquet and Catering Facility
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 < 0
Volumes 20 27 2 223 19 312 2 305 224 351 285 21
PHF or PK15 0 .80 0 .80 0 .80 0 . 72 0 .72 0 .90 0 .50 0 .95 0 . 96 0 .95 0 . 82 0 .82
Lane W (ft) 15 .0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 2 3 1 1 10
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 4 .00 4 .00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 4 . 00 5 .00 5 .00 4 .00 5 . 00 5 .00
Prop. Share 42
Prop. Prot .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
1 WB Left * SB Left Thru Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16 . OA 8 . OA Green 9 . OA 1 . OA 23 . OP
Yellow/AR 4 .0 4 . 0 Yellow/AR 4 . 0 4 . 0 7 .0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- ---
EB LTR 180 1798 0 .339 0 .100 22 . 1 C 22 . 1 C
WB L 350 1752 0 .511 0 .200 19 .5 C 16 .5 C
LT 365 1824 0 .425 0 .200 18 . 6 C
' R 600 1599 0 .580 0 .375 14 . 0 B
NB L 203 1805 0 . 020 0 .112 20 .4 C 10 .4 B
T 1164 3725 0 .290 0 .313 13 .5 B
R 882 1568 0 .265 0 .563 5 . 9 B
SB L 625 3574 0 .609 0 .175 20 .9 C 16 .1 C
TR 1382 3687 0 .284 0 .375 11.3 B
Intersection Delay = 14 .8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
1 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 17 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 .435
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
� UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
' CAPACITY ANALYSES
' EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f 0198PM.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
-------------
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1998 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 323 9 122 385 7 71
PHF .864 . 864 . 898 .898 . 812 .812
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s (o) 0 0 0
SU/RV' s ($) 0 0 0
CV' s (W) 1 0 0
PCE' s 1 .01 1. 00 1 .00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (t
----------------------------- -
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 . 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0198PM.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
' Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 379
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 890
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 890
' Pro - ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 090------------- _- - - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 384
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1125
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1125
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 88
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State : -----------------0_86-
-
--------------------- ------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 944
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 301
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 . 86
Adjusted Impedance Factor. 0 . 86
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 . 86
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 259
--------------------------------------------------------
' Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
-
------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
WB L 9 259 >
725 5 . 7 0 .5 B 5 .7
1 WB R 87 890 >
SB L 137 1125 3 .6 0 .4 A 0 .9
' Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0198SAT.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
' Ph: (860) 657-3579
------------------------------------ -
Streets: (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
' Other Information. . . . . . . . .1998 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
---------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 268 5 52 322 12 72
PHF .898 .898 .95 95 . 636 .636
' Grade 0 0 0
MC' s 0 0 0
SU/RV' s (`s) 0 0 0
Cv'' PCEss (�) 1 . 02 1 .00 1 . 01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
1
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0198SAT.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
-
-------------------------------------------------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 301
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 975
Movement Capacity:. (pcph) 975
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .88
' Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 304
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1228
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1228
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
' of Queue-Free-State:
-------------------0 .95
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 736
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 397
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 . 95
Adjusted Impedance . Factor: 0 .95
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0 .95
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 377
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
WB--L--- ---19- --377->
795 5 .4 0 . 7 B 5 .4
' WB R 114 975 >
SB L 56 1228 3 .1 0 .0 A 0 .4
' Intersection Delay = 0 .8 sec/veh
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0298PM.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph:- (860) -657=3579_____________________________________________________
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
' Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1998 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
' No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 391 6 5 500 4 12
PHF . 87 . 87 .921 .921 .666 . 666
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s (o) 0 0 0
SU/RV' s (o) 0 0 0
PCE' s (�) 1.20 1.25 1 .00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left-Turn-Major-Road 5 .50 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30
' Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40
' HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0298PM.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
' Step tep-1: RT from Minor Street-------------WB-----------EB
---------------------------------------_-----------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 228
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1061
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1061
' Pro - ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 098------------- _- - - -------------
Step 2 . LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 456
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 976
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 976
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
' --- Queue-Free-State:
-------------------0----
99-------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1000
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 243
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 .99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 241
--------------------------------------------------------
' Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
WB L 8 241 >
518 7 .3 0 .0 B 7 .3
WB R 18 1061 >
SB L 6 976 3 .7 0 . 0 A 0 .0
Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 sec/veh
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f 0298SAT.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
' Ph:- (860) -657=3579_____________________________________________________
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
' Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
' Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1998 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak
Two-way Stop controlled Intersection
' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
' Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 341 1 8 373 0 8
PHF .95 . 95 . 95 .95 .4 .4
' Grade 0 0 0
MCI (o) 0 0 0
SU/RV' s (a) 0 0 0
CV'CEss (�) 1 .15 1 .00 1. 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left-Turn-Major-Road 5 .50 2 . 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60
' Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40
1
' HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0298SAT.HCO Page 2
. WorksheetforTWSCIntersection----_- ---- - - - --------------
Step 1 . RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 180
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1122
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1122
' Prob._ ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 098------------- _- - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 360
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1099
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1099
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
' of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 760
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 346
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .99
' Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 .99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 343
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
' Avg. 95%_
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
WB--L--- ----0- --343->------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
1122 3 .3 0 .0 A 3 .3
' WB R 20 1122 >
SB L 9 1099 3 .3 0 .0 A 0 .1
Intersection Delay = 0 .1 sec/veh
� UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
' CAPACITY ANALYSES
� 1999 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0199PM.HCO Page 1
' Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
' Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak w/
2%- Background Growth
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 329 9 124 393 7 72
PHF .864 . 864 .898 .898 .812 . 812
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s (W) 0 0 0
' SU/RV' s M 0 0 0
CV' S (0) 1 0 0
PCE' s 1 .01 1 .00 1. 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time------------------------------ - ------------ - --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 . 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f 0199PM.HCO Page 2
-----------Worksheet-for-TWSC-Intersection
--------------
Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 386
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 883
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 883
Prob- ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 090------------- _
---- - - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 391
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1116
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1116
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .88
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
' Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0 .86
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 962
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 294
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .86
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 86
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 .86
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 252
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
WB L 9 252 >
718 5 . 8 0 .5 B 5 .8
WB R 89 883 >
SB L 139 1116 3 . 7 0 .4 A 0 .9
Intersection Delay = 1 .0 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0199SAT.HCO Page 1
--------------- -------------
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
' Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak w
/ 2% Background Growth
' Two-way-Stop-controlled-Intersection
-----------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 273 5 53 328 12 73
PHF .898 .898 .95 95 .636 .636
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s (0) 0 0 0
SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0
CV' s (W) 2 0 1
PCE' s 1 . 02 1. 00 1 . 01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) ------------Time- (tf)
---------------------------------------------- -
Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10
1 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
1
' HCS__Unsignalized-Intersections
Release-2 . lf--__0199SAT.HCO--__Page_2
------ ----Worksheet-for-TWSC-Intersection
--------------
Step 1 .• RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 307
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 968
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 968
Pro - ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 088------------- _
- - - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 310
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1220
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1220
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: -----------------0 .95
---------------------- ----------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 743
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 393
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 . 95
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .95
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 . 95
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 372
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
WB L 19 372 >
790 5 .5 0 .7 B 5 .5
WB R 116 968 >
SB L 57 1220 3 .1 0 .0 A 0 .4
Intersection Delay = 0 .8 sec/veh
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0299PM.HCO Page 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
' Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets: (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak w/
2% Background Growth
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
-------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 399 6 5 510 4 12
PHF .87 . 87 .921 . 921 . 666 .666
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s 0 0 0
SU/RV' s 0 0 0
CV' s (o) 20 25 0
PCE' s 1 .20 1 .25 1 . 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
1 Maneuver Gap (tg)- ------------Time- (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60
' Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40
' HCS_-Unsignalized_Intersections
_-_Release_2 .1f_---0299PM_HCO__---Page_2
' ----------
-W--- -- -- -eforTWSC-Intersection--------------
Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 233
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1055
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1055
Pro - ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 098
------------- _
- - - -------------
Step 2 . LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 466
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 964
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 964
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major-LT-Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1022
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 235
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0 .99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 233
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 9596
' Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
WB L 8 233 >
506 7 .5 0 .0 B 7 .5
WB R 18 1055 >
SB L 6 964
3 .8 0 . 0 A 0 .0
Intersection Delay = 0 .1 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0299SAT.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
' Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
' Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak w
/ 2% Background Growth
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 348 1 8 380 0 8
' PHF .95 .95 .95 . 95 .4 .4
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s ($} 0 0 0
SU/RV' s M 0 0 0
CV' s M 15 0 0
PCE' s 1. 15 1 .00 1 . 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
' Maneuver Gap- (tg) ------------ -Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 .00 3 .40
HCS__Unsignalized_Intersections
__-Release_2_1f0299SAT_HCO Page_2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
' Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 184
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1117
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1117
' Prob. ofQueue_ -Queue-Free State: 0 .98
-------------
-
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 367
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1089
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1089
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
-- Queue-Free-State:
-------------------0----
99-------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 774
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 339
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor. 0 .99
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 336
--------------------------------------------------------
aIntersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
WB--L--- ----0- --336->------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
1117 3 .3 0 .0 A 3 .3
WB R 20 1117 >
SB L 9 1089 3 .3 0 .0 A 0 . 1
Intersection Delay = 0 .1 sec/veh
� UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
' CAPACITY ANALYSES
� 1999 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
HCS: Unsignalized-Intersections Release 2_1f ---0199PMF_Hco ---Page-I
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
-_=-s_=ar=c=s====scsxss==x=sxacs=ssas====xsx==xss==a¢=s===sac=xs=csms=c
' Streets: (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
' Analyst . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak w/
Banquet & Catering
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Bastbound Westbound
-L-- -T-- -R-- L-- -T-- --- -L-- -T-- -R-- -- -T-- -R--
No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 329 57 220 393 13 83
PHF .864 .864 .898 .898 .812 .812
Grade 0 0 0
' MC' s 0 0 0
SU/RV' s (W) 0 0 0
CVOs (W) 1 0 0
' PCE' s .00
--�--------------------1-01--------------------------1-00------1---
Adjustment Factors
' Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
------------------------------------------------------------- -----
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 .60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .00 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3 .40
' HCS. Unsignalized_Intersections ReleaseY2_1f _0199PMF.HC4 Page`2
csoxsaz=sc-
' . WorksheetforTWSCIntersection------ ---- - - - --------------
Step 1. RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 414
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 854
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 854
' Prob- ofQueue_ -Queue-Free 088------------- _- - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 447
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1050
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1050
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .76
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
' MajorLT Shared-Lane-Prob------ - - -
of Queue-Free State: - --- -0•73-------------
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows (vph) ---------------1097-------------
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 245
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 . 73
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .73
' Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.73
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 179
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%_
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
WB16- --179->------ ------- ------- ----- -- ------
--L--- --- 565 8 .1 0 .9 B 8.1
WB R 102 854 >
SB L 247 1050 4 .5 1.1 A 1.6
' Intersection Delay = 1.6 sec/veh
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0199SATF.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
' Glastonbury, CT- 06033-6585 -
Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets: {N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Rye Street
' Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . .. . . . . 7/15/98
' Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak w
Banquet & Catering
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
' - -- - -- - - - --'- -- - -- - -- - -- - -_ - �-�- --<- _-
No. Lanes 0 1 < 0
� 2 0 0 0 O 0 � �
Stop/Yield N N
' Volumes 273 59 160 328 66 180
PHF .898 .898 .95 95 .636 .636
Grade 0 0 0
MC's 0 0 0
' SU/RV' s 0 0 0
CV' s W 2 0 1
PC8' s 1.02 1.00 1 .01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
' Maneuver
------------------------------Gap--tg) Time
----- ------ - --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 .60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
1
' HCS� Unsignalizedr Intersections
Release-2 .1f -0199SATF.HCO�-T Page-2
' • WorksheetforTWSCIntersection------ ---- - - - --------------
Step 1. RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 337
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 934
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 934
Prob._ ofQueue_ -FreeState--------------O_
- - ---------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 370
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1142
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1142
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .85
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major SharedLaneProb o -----`------------------------
f Queue-Free State: 0 .83
- -
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows . - (vph) ----------------885--------------
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 325
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .83
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .83
' Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 . 83
Movement Capacity; (pcph) 270
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
--- --- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
W L >
564 20 .3 6 .4 D 20 .3
WB R 286 934 >
SB L 171 1142 3 .7 0 .6 A 1 .2
Intersection Delay = 5 .3 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0299PMF.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
' Glastonbury, CT -06033=6585 - - - -- - -- -
Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets : (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
' Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
tOther Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Friday PM Peak w/
Banquet & Catering
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- -- - -- - -- - --�- -- - - - -- - -- - - - --'- --�- --
No. Lanes 0 2 < � 0 � � 0 � 0 0 � 4
Stop/Yield N N
1 Volumes 410 6 5 606 4 12
PHF .87 .87 .921 .921 .666 .666
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s 0 0 0
!, SU/RV's ( ) 0 0 0
CV1s (1) 20 25 0
PCE' s 1.20 1 .25 1.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Time
------------------------------------ ------------ - --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 .00 3 .40
HCSUnsignalized Intersections Release_2 .1f0299PMF.HCO_�--Page r2
W----------- --- --e--for-TWSC-Intersection--------------
Step l : RT from Minor Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 239
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1048
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1048
' - ofQueue_Free 0.98
-------------------- -
---- - - -------------
Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB
' ---------------- -------------
Conflicting Flows . (vph) 478
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 949
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 949
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
--- ---Queue-Free- State:
-
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB
' Conflicting Flows. (vph) ---------------1138-------------
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 198
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 .99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 196
--------------------------------------------------------
' Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95W
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
--- ---------
WB---
L---
----8- --196->------ ------- ------- --
448 8 .5 0 . 1 B 8 .5
WB R 18 1048 >
SB L 6 949 3 .8 0 .0 A 0 .0
Intersection Delay = 0 .1 sec/veh
i
1
1
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0299SATF.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
' Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets: (N-S) Sullivan Avenue (E-W) Commerce Way
Major Street Direction. . . . NS
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/15/98
' Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Saturday PM Peak w
/ Banquet & Catering
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
' No. Lanes 0 - 2 <_0_ �-- ----
_O__ _0__ _�__ _�_ _O__>-�-_<_0--
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 455 1 8 487 0 8
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .4 .4
Grade 0 0 0
MC's 0 0 0
' SU/RV' s 0 0 0
CV' s 15 0 0
PCE' s 1.15 1.00 1 .00
-------------------- .--------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
' Maneuver---------------- ------------Gap-(-g> Time
------------ -
j^ --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 .10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 .00 3 .40
HCS. Unsignalized Intersections_ Release 2 .1f0299SATF_HCO Page�2
' • ----Worksheet-for-TWSC-Intersection
T----- ------------ -
Step 1. RT from Minor Street WB FB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 240
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1046
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1046
' Prob._ ofQueue_ -FreeState---------------�
- - ---------------
Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB
' - ------------- ---r---------
Conflicting Flows. (vph) 480
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 947
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 947
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
' Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0 .99
Step 4 : _LT from Minor Street WB - - --EB
' Conflicting Flows. - (vph) ---------------1Q00 - ----------
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 243
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 .99
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 .99
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 240
--------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95W
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
WB L 0 240
1046 3 .5 0 .0 A 3 .5
WB R 20 1046 >
SB L 9 947 3 .8 0.0 A 0 .1
Intersection Delay 0 .1 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0399PMF.HCO Page 1
' SSSSS S.S+sSSSSSS�L'S�SC.4S3�3�.�YSS--.S=.�C�S�^.�..T..SSS.TSLSS^.CSCS SSSSiwL4SSC.S S�SSSS6C
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
Glastonbury, _CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
-s�=s=samxss...a...sscs.:=oosa=sosszxs=s=xsssssse=sas=ss essaxssass=ssyese=asss
Streets: (N-S) Site Drive (E-W) Rye Street
Major Street Direction. . . . EW
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/20/98
Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Fri PM Peak W/ Ban
quet & Catering Facility
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
' x=sssosac=s=n�ss=ocsn=s.cszamzm=x=sss=smssxss.:ass=sssss.-�=s=csamxs.-a=s=
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- -_ - -- - -- - --�- - - -- - -- - -- - -->- --<- --
No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 Q � 4 0 0 0 � � 0
Stop/Yield N N
' Volumes 144 131 78 36 4 16
PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s M 0 0 0
' SU/RV' s (W) 0 0 0
CVIS (U 0 0 0
PCE's 1.00 1 . 00 1.00
1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver
------------ ---------------------(-g} Time
------------ -
�- --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 .10
' Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
HCS_-Unsignalized Intersections
--^Release-2 .1f----0399PMF_HCO--- Page 2
' -----------Worksheet-for-TWSC-Intersection
--------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 113
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1214
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1214
Free
Prob. of
98
--- - ----- --
Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB gB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 134
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1480
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1480
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .89
' TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue_ State_ 87
--------------------0_
----- -------
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows . - (vph) -----------------------------436
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 592
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0 . $7
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .87
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0.87
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 518
--------------------------------------------------------
' Intersection Performance Summary
' 95%-
Flow Move Shared Total
Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
SB--L--- ----5- --518->------ ------- ------- ----- ---------
948 3 .9 0 .0 A 3 .9
' SB R 19 1214 >
E£B L 169 1480 2 .7 0 .4 A 1.4
Intersection Delay = 1 .2 sec/veh
HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f 0399SATF.HCO Page 1
Traffic Engineering Solutions
193 Lexington Road
' Glastonbury, CT 06033-6585
Ph: (860) 657-3579
Streets: (N-S) Site Drive (E-W) Rye Street
' Major Street Direction. . . . EW
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min)
Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAH
Date of Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 7/20/98
' Other Information. . . . . . . . . 1999 Traffic Volumes Sat PM Peak w/ Ban
quet & Catering Facility
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
' No. Lanes 0 > 1 0- 0 1 < 0 0 - 0-- 0 -0 0 < 0-
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 160 57 84 40 40 160
PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85
Grade 0 0 0
MC' s (W) 0 0 0
' SU/RV' s 0 0 0
CV' s ($) 0 0 0
PCE' s 1.00 1.00 1 .00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
' Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap-------------------- --------- --tg) Time
------------ -
-� --
Left Turn Major Road 5 .00 2 .10
' Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .00 3 .30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40
HCSUnsignalizedr Intersections
Release_2_1f0399SATF_HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
' Step 1. RT from-Minor Street-------------NB-----------SB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 122
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1201
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1201
Pro - ofQueue- -Free State 084
--------------------------- _
- - -
Step 2 . LT from Major Street WB EB
--------------------------------------------------------
' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 146
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1461
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1461
' Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .87
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
-of-Queue-Free-State--------------------------------0_87
Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB
' Conflicting Flows. - (vph) -----------------------------378
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 640
' Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.87
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.87
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0.87
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 554
--------------------------------------------------------
' Intersection Performance Summary
' Avg. 950
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
' - 554 >------ ------ ------- ----- ---------
SB--L--- ---47 974 4 .9 1.1 A 4 .9
' SB R 188 1201 >
EB L 188 1461 2 .8 0 .5 A 2 .1
' Intersection Delay = 2 .6 sec/veh
G
■
Cpesign
rofessionals, inc.
Civil Engineers • Planners • Surveyors CIS
Hydrolop,ic Study
for
Maneeley's Banquet
Facility, L.L.C.
South Windsor, Connecticut
Proj. No. 98-1029
RECEIVED
AUG 5 1998
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING O PT.
1 t /
g t,
I `ero f�?7'rd k LY •`�
July 29, 1998
Table of Contents
Summaryand Conclusions ................ ..............................................................................1
Introduction ................................................................. 2
Methodology.......... ............................ 3
.....................................
Proposed Drainage Basin A x I Calculations..................................... ...................4-5
Proposed Storm Drainage Calculations ........................................................................6-7
Calculations sheet....................................... 8
Rainfall intensity chart for Hartford...... ... ................................. ......................9
Chart 3 time of concentration......................................................................10
Drainage area map fold out........................................................................I I
s
Drainage Summary
July 29, 1998
Maneeley's Banquet
Facility,L.L.C.
File no. 98-1029
Existing Proposed
Runoff Development
2 year storm 2.0 5.0
10 year storm 3.3 7.9
25 year storm 3.9 9.8
50 year storm 4.5 10.7
100 year storm 5.0 11.7
in C.F.S.
A 49-minute time of concentration was used for the runoff calculations for existing
conditions. The Bio-filter increases the time of concentration for the proposed conditions
from approximately 12 minutes to 34 minutes. No detention is proposed, it is understood
that the industrial park has a detention basin further down stream.
Conclusions
The use of a bio-filter and sedimentation basins will act to clean the runoff and
preserve the quality of the stream leaving the property
Introduction
The subject of this drainage study is approximately 5.4 acres located on the
northern side of Rye Street in South Windsor, Connecticut.
Under existing conditions, the site drains to the northwest towards a stream
adjacent to the boundry of the property The site is a farm land with some wooded area
along the stream.
The proposed improvements to the site include the construction of a Banquet
facility with corporate offices, kitchen, storage, parking for 199 vehicles, and a storm
water management system including a biofiltration basin. Under proposed conditions, the
site will drain to the biofiltration basin and then to the existing stream.. The total .
discharge of 7.9 cfs, for a ten year storm.
Methodology
The rational method was used to determine 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year storm
discharges for pre-existing and for proposed conditions.
Drainage Study
A x I Calculations
Existing Conditions Acres I A x I
for Drainage
Impervious 0 0.9 0.000
Pervious 5.48 0.3 1.644
1.644
Proposed Conditions
CB1 Impervoius 0.21 0.9 0.189
Pervious 0.04 0.3 0.012
0.201
CB2 Impervious 0.03 0.9 0.027
Pervious 0.01 0.3 0.003
0.030
CB3 Impervious 0.4 0.9 0.360
Pervious 0.08 0.3 0.024
0.384
CB4 Impervious 0.065 0.9 0.059
Pervious 0.001 0.3 0.000
0.059
CB5 Impervious 0.18 0.9 0.162
Pervious 0.08 0.3 0.024
0.186
CB6 Impervious 0.25 0.9 0.225
Pervious 0.09 0.3 0.027
- 0.252
C137 Impervious 0.09 0.9 0.081
Pervious 0.03 0.3 0.009
0.090
CB8 Impervious 0.22 0.9 0.198
Pervious 0.05 0.3 0.015
0.213
C139 Impervious 0.41 0.9 0.369
Pervious 0.17 0.3 0.051
0.420
CB10 Impervious 0.2 0.9 0.180
Pervious 0.13 0.3 0.039
0.219
C811 Impervious 0.3 0.9 0.270
Pervious 0.04 0.3 0.012
0.282
7/31/98 R. A.
Drainage Study
A x I Calculations
CB12 Impervious 0.38 0.9 0.342
Pervious 0.1 0.3 0.030
0.372
F/D Impervious 0.034 0.9 0.031
Pervious 0 0.3 0.000
0.031
BIO FILTER Impervious 0 0.9 0.000
Pervious 0.46 0.3 0.138
0.138
7/31/98 R. A.
U)
w o
m
z w U a CA
a
z W w w
w z — < W w Z — z
Z w j c� O
a w J 1- w O W
w O Z M W p J (n N Q a
LL CD r
z z o L N .- 2 U) r w a U 3
w W W O U Z U Q. p
z U w F- � _ 2 d Z O W
U J Q
Q Q - _
Z (Y d a. J (n Q U- z C
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
/ - 2 /0 ,01 /D•v . 20 ,20 y7 9 " Cp Y..95
.2-7 ol . D 3 2 3 . 7 1 /•08 JS `QCP 0. S% 2.711 3.9,5 olS
- / /p 3$y 3o i!7 /, 30 /S`2C� 7 / .3 % 3.l 0�3o U/5 m
f
rn
- /0 ,30 /o, ,o54 6 7 1,!�z 3,16 15'2CP 6AI s% 36 3.95 0�5
a �
x m
,3 /0 , 9 /66 S6 '/5 3,S7 /5'6-0 6y' 0.5 °/ 3--7 �,q o�5 ( z m
a v ;
co CD
—�j /o z� //• 2 zsZ / // , y, 5 S.o /3`' d,50 ° y. o c,'ry
m
N
%- /0 '06 /o ,09 '09 11,7 •Y2 .111,9 13,1 0/s o
z
N 4
/O l e 11, 57 21 -3 /�. �/ ni x m
� z N
n
2
'Y,7 /, 97 /5 ' fj'v ' l�. d / 3.y y.y
N
7 219 2,05 i!y 7,01 1 211
i3.9 015 N
o �J
T\ I
d — LINE SEGMENT
of IJ '
TIME TO INLET
TIME IN PIPE
O ACCUMULATED TIME
G
a o d
w w N W Al ENTERING
CATCH BASIN
N Iv
SUM OF 'AI
- ` IN SYSTEM
141
in ti RAINFALL INTENSITY
cD W oo Q IN SYSTEM
a= cn PIPE SIZE
6N.
Q)_ '`� p LENGTH OF PIPE
cf\ u\ v = SLOPE
W
�o N W N AVERAGE VELOCITY
.0 W FULL CAPACITY
A HEADWATER
O o o — In.
oN 133HS A8 03NO3HO W2l13 13 alS
31VO A8 03NJIS30 1D3PO8d
2*2 WNO-A NOIS30 V431SAS 83Ak3S AHO1S bZo/ -86
•:AT E SHEET NO. ..... -....AF
H..KC SY _ DATE. JOB NO--.. .... .._.._._.... .-..-_..._...........
n4t'
s/opes _ tle't- c Y130—
c� �OOIC.. _ _ 2. F� X st�� :__ (n7o a _J s0—
_ _.
77
2
cam- --- - -
a-^-cQ
' -- -- .. - `�.0 lX� �C7��. ti+"-a�W�A1.� � d•�-��L_`-�-L L L�� L.�D t-.b Q4.,/--. �Z
icrc2
Lm(7 K7VC^'
Al
3 IC. t_S. AL.A.
o . 4 0 .71._
TL 13 0 �C
l - -
(c� 3 1 J
un �c�v-T _�.G -�-�-D._ _ Z-r(-. v�'�_�..�c�....._�� S.__.� xq.qQ.
3y
RAINFALL INTENSITY CHART IN INCHES PER HOUR
MARTFORD , CT
STORM MINUTES
(YRS) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 118 19 20 121 122 23 124 1 25 26 127 28 29 130 31 32
2 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1. 7
10 6.2 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2. 7 2.6 2.6
25 7.1 6.7 6.4 6.1 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.2 ~
50 7.7 7.4 7.0 6.7 6.5 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6
100 8.4 8.0 7.6 7'.3 7.0 6.8 6.6 76.4r6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2r5.115.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8
STORM MINUTES
(YRS) 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1. 1 1.1 1.1 1.1
10 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
25 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1
50 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3
100 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3. 1 3. 1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.812.81 2.712.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6
CHART 2
January 1
55
4000 W
z
3000 J 50
H
O
2000 a 45
40
1000
900 35
800
TOO w
� F-
600� Z 30
y
500
PAV E� W Z
400 Z
0.90-m` z 2-5
F- O \x.I O
W 300 0.80 0
>-
W > ,' �► Q
U. D: c
0.70 a 1-
Z z
200 BARE SOIL 0.60 \ w 20
_ IL. \� 0.i w z
F-
0 _ POOR GRASS 0 , a V
2 SURFACE O.45 \ 0
U.
w 1- IN. U.
cn 0
0.35 z W
AVERAGE GRASS w
O=_ SURFACE O'30 U 1.0 w - 15
80 c� F-
�` 0.20 � 2.,0 I---\\ F
70 DENSE GRASS 0.15 w Z \ �-w�
�-0 5-0 tAJ, �
50 e' ti 1 10.0 w
20.0 CL
40 \
10\
30
9
8
20
7
6
w
z
10 J 5
EXAMPLE 'A' > EXAMPLE �B� —
LENGTH: 700FEET a LENGTH: 100 FEET
PAVED DENSE GRASS
SLOPE: 1.0 % SLOPE: 6.0 %
TIME: 10 MINUTES TIME : 13 1/= MINUTES
TOXIN OF SOUTH WINDSOR NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINING APPROVED
STANDARD DETAIL TIME' OF CONCENTRATION
JANUARY, 1991 (CHART 3)
R[VISLD: PUBLIC WORKS DIRCCTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer
DATE: August 5, 1998
RE: Maneeley's Resubdivision/Site Plan 98-41P
We are in receipt of the drawing dated July 23, 1998 for the proposed Maneeley's
Resubdivision/Site Plan and cannot comment on it as it is incomplete.
JCl/sfg
SOWN 34N
o
a
m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
��►osoR,Ca�`'� AREA CODE 860/644-2511
To: Design Professionals
165 So. Satellite Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
From: Jeffrey H. Folger-Zoning/Wetland Enforcement Officer
Date: August 6, 1998
Re: App. #98-41P - Review of the proposed Maneeley' Banquet facility - Plans dated 7/31/98.
I have reviewed the proposed plan with the following comments:
1. Item#4 should be amended to read: "All erosion control measures are to be inspected,
maintained, or replaced on a weekly basis or within 24 hours of a storm event".
2. Sediment and Erosion Control Notes: Items 4,5,6, and 12 contain typographic errors and
should be corrected.
3. CB#10 and 12 have an icons for a sedimentation structure. CB# 12 is not labeled as such.
There is no detail for a sediment structure on the plans.
4. A detail to correspond with#14 of the E&S Narrative should be included in the plans.
CC IWA/CC
Town Engineer
Dir. of Planning
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer
DATE: August 10, 1998
RE: Maneeley's Resubdivision/Site Plan
We have reviewed the plans dated July 31, 1998, received August 5, 1998, for the
proposed Maneeley's Resubdivision/Site Plan and have the following comments:
1. Driveway radius at Rye Street not indicated.
2. A cleanout is required for the sanitary lateral.
3. Riprap pads must be dimensioned and a detail provided.
4. Roof drainage is not addressed.
JCl/sfg
P&Z/maneeleys/review810
RECEIVED
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC. AUG 12 1998
civil engineers planners surveyors gis
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT.
August 11, 1998
Marcia Banach, Planning Director
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Marcia:
REGARDING: Maneeley's Inc. Project No. 97-1029
65 Rye Street
South Windsor, Connecticut
Please be advised that my client requests that the applicant be identified as "Maneeley's ,
Inc." rather than Maneeley's Banquet Facility LLC. We would appreciate that this name change
is reflected in any approval letter or legal notice for same. Thank you.
Design 4Peter
sionals, Inc.
By: /Z////,
. DeMallie
Principal
cc: Bruce Maneeley
Darrell Chaloult
Design Professionals,Inc. 165 South Satellite Road South Windsor,CT 06074 860 291-8755 fax 291-8757
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM
TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw Michael Gantick, Thomas Field, Bill Lanning, John
Bond, Ray Favreau, ar Reichle, Mel Stead, John Collins, Bob Deptula
FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning
The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:
Location:
Q Site Plan D Subdiv # Acres z oo �7 Zone T
industrial 0'6ommercial ❑ Residential # Lots/Units
Water: VPublic ❑ Private Well Sewerage: 0/Public ❑ Septic system(s)
Project Description: 6 10 tdy 1 C %
Future Town-owned property involved? ❑ Yes Ef'No
❑ new street(s) ❑ new detention area
❑ new open space./recreation area ❑ active ❑ passive
Planning Department notes:
Please comment by (feel free to use this form); return to Planning
Department. Thank you.
60,!2,
D �
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer
DATE: August 17, 1998
RE: Maneeley's Resubdivision/Site Plan
We have reviewed the revised plans dated August 11, 1998, received August 13,
1998, for the proposed Maneeley's Resubdivision/Site Plan and have the following
comments:
1. A cleanout is required for the sanitary lateral.
2. Roof leader from building to the level spreader requires a rip-rap pad.
JCl/sfg
P&Z/maneeleys/memo aug17
'to SC44
a
s . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
f�OSOR•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511
CERTIFIED MAIL
August 24, 1998
D &L Caron, L.L.C.
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re: Appl#98-41P,Maneeley's, Inc.,Resubdivision
We are pleased to advise you that the Planning&Zoning Commission voted on August 18, 1998, to approve`
with modifications, the above-referenced application for a Site Plan of Development.
This approval is for the resubdivision of two lots located northwesterly of Rye Street, northerly side of Sullivan
Avenue and southerly of Commerce Way, I zone, as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals dated
-August 11, 1998, as revised. This approval is subject to the following modifications:
1. This approval is for 2 lots,numbered 42 and 42A.
2. Drainage and construction for this subdivision are subject to the approval of the Town Engineer.
3. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the
approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority.
4. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water.
5. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of
South Windsor.
6. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the
approval of this subdivision,must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this
Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space,public
improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in
accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and
Town Attorney.
7. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed, the Town Engineer
shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be
submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
8. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer(on the enclosed form) for the purpose of
determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans.
If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one-year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter
of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit
has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the
Letter it is holding.
9. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$ 50.00 shall be submitted to this Commission.
10. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have
been filed in the Town Clerk's office.
Black and white transparent mylars of Sheet 3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint
copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed.
The letters of approval of this Commission as well as the'Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission
must be reproduced on the mylars.
After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will lie returned to you for filing in the Office of the
Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department.
bCe 7/ &r -
Very truly yours,
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Frank A. Castro, Chairman
FAC/dlw
Enclosure
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
Assessor
Superintendent of Pollution Control
Fire Marshal
CW N Se4
y - r Town- a,,- -Ottt4 V
o
Z 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
August 24, 1998
Certified Mail
Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC
26 Schweir Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re: Appl #98-41P, Maneeley's Banquet Facility/Rye Street
At the August 17, 1998 special meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation
Commission approved appl #98-41P, Maneeley's Banquet Facility, LLC - IWA/CC
permit for the construction of a 16,516 sq. ft. building and associated improvements
on property located northerly of Rye Street and northerly of Sullivan Avenue, I zone,
Assessor's map #121, parcel 15 as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals,
Inc., Job. No. #98-1029 and revised through August 11, 1998. This approval is subject
to the following conditions:
1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon,
must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed within 65 days of
approval prior to any construction activity on the site. Plans submitted to Planning
& Zoning Commission shall be considered having met this requirement.
2. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor
against any liability, which might result from the proposed operation or use.
3. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on August 17, 2003. It is the
landowner(s)/applicant(s) responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the
Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration.
4. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the
site.
5. A contact person shall be identified on the plans.
6. We recommend a bond in the amount of $5,000 be submitted to the Planning &
Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Measures.
7. The biofilter in the swale will be accepted as mitigation for the wetlands taken in
this project.
8. If the soil permeability allows for more drainage, dry well/ will be
installed to accommodate first flush flows.
Very truly yours,
INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
z 4(
Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairman
EAW/pmm
Cc: Chief Building Official
Planning & Zoning Commission
Town Engineer
Design Professionals, Inc.
�S0WN SEq<�
a
9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
�oSOR,co AREA CODE 203/644-2511
August 28, 1998
Maneeley's Banquet Facility, L.L.C.
26 Schweir Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
RE: Maneeley's Banquet Facility
65 Rye Street
SOUTH WINDSOR, CT
Dear Mr. Maneeley:
The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority, at its special meeting of August 20, 1998, gave approval
for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a commercial building at 65 Rye Street, as more specifically
shown on drawing entitled "Topographic Map--Resurvey prepared for Maneeley's Banquet Facility, L.L.C. --65
Rye Street--South Windsor, Connecticut" by Design Professionals, Inc., South Windsor, Connecticut,Job No.
98-1029, Drawing No. 1029W, Sheet No. 6/11,dated July 31, 1998, no revisions, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Technical approval of the Town Engineering De
PP g g Department.
t.
2. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the
sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff, and based upon the written verification of
the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design
plans previously approved by the Authority, and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical
specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction.
3. This app6al letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans.
Very truly yours,
Tho ag"Hindson, Chairman RECEIVElyWater Pollution Control Authority
TH:rt SEP
cc: Matthew Galligan,Town Manager
Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works �� puyry DEPT.
Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer
John Collins, Chief Building Inspector
' SOW N SE,
C
70mn aYe SotdA ?A
s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
sox-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
September 4, 1998
D &L Caron, L.L.C.
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re:Preconstruction Meeting—Appl 98-41P,Maneely's, Inc. Resubdivision
IN ATTENDANCE
Jerry lazzetta Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 245
Sgt. Tom Field South Windsor Police 648-6211
Michele Lipe Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 252
Jeff Folger Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 229
Robert Arsenault Design Professionals 291-8755
t 165 South Satellite Rd
South Windsor, CT
Chris Eseppi PDS 107 Old Windsor 242-8586
Bloomfield, CT
Bill Jodice PDS " " 44 66
Darrell Charlout Maneeley 65 Rye Street 528-662
South Windsor, CT
Bruce Maneeley " " " °G « fL
Barbara Berner ` ° «
The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in
each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands
Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place,prior to commencement of site work or
if any problems/concerns arise during construction.
2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected(ringed with haybales or equal).
3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained
to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel on to Rye Street and Commerce Way. Calcium chloride or water is
to be used for dust control as required.
Public Works
1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction.
They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved
plans are to be used on the job site.
2. The Public Works Department is to be notified forty-eight(48)hours prior to the start of major
construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist requested for the following:
a. After site is staked out
b. All drainage work
c. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist
d. Preparation of subbase, six(6) inch lifts
e. Placement of bituminous concrete, two (2) inch layers maximum
3. Certification of gravel used as subbase and processed stone for base will be required from an approved
testing company.
4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures,pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town
Engineer prior to installation..
5. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation.
6. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and
sanitary sewers and house service laterals located as per revised as-built checklist.
7. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts
with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered.
8. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to
Darrell Charlout in the field at phone 251-0173 and(Pager) and 528-6622.
9. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications which is to be
compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary.
10. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town.
11 Forty-eight(48)hour's notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection.
12. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to
implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt
to turn around within 24 hours.
13. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m.,no work on Sunday.
14. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works.
15. Drain layer and street excavation permit required for sanitary sewer, water and gravel driveway.'
�' Y
Planning Department
1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes
required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not
preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan.
t
2. Final landscape plan to be submitted in triplicate.
3. ADRC meeting to be held on September 17, 1998 to review the sign proposal.
4. Erosion and sedimentation and landscape bonds are required.
5. Quantity estimates required for the subdivision.
6. Mylars must go on file prior to issuance of a building permit.
SNET/NU
1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection.
Fire Marshal
1. Blasting(if required) to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal.
Police Services
1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a
company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency
numbers must be provided to Police Services.
2. All buildings located on property that abuts a public highway must be numbered and visible from the
street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 thru 6-802.
Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are
excluded.
3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project.
4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services.
Building Department
1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit.
Coordinate with Chief Building Official.
t Very truly yours,
Michele R. Lipe, AICP
Assistant Director of Planning
MRL/dlw
cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer
Jeff Folger, Planning, IWA
Karl Reichle, Public Works
Mel Stead, Public Works
Tom Ludwig, CL&P
Minh V. Le, SNET
John R. Collins, Chief Building Official
Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers planners surveyors
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: -e DATE: - 16— 9
Sou��t Wv&�v2
REGARDING: 9 1. PROJECT NO: — ! o Z9
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
for your use PA,at your request
for approval for your files
for review and comment
THE FOLLOWING: flfl n
1
a. RECEIVED
S EP 18 1998
SOUTH WINDS
OR
ENG.DEPT
- Design Professionals, Inc.
2LL,4
By:
no
165 South Satellite Road South Windsor, CT 06074
Tel 860 291-8755 Fax 860 291-8757
10."Fj'i:'IT; i 4: I0 ::bah iJ'=: 1:1 Ti=d,�FI i=F DD WIPIf
TOWN OF SOUTH wtvDSOR
PROJECT:
STREET: — BOND E=MATE FORINI
P&Z I.D.: 20-- N ! 1
ENGINEER: a,A,lcx,,,,—S 1996 CALENDAR YEAR
DATE: Gj—1-7-113
C�S—►oZ el Bond Bond
Unit Reduction
i Y
2 SLriQ& tto�ScMnlir
Exth E:caratiM
(Exciudin= Roadway
4- Roadwly Ejavalica
._
6 Exib Trwch Exc- 0-10 CY t
18, v
19- ' Bit. Cmay's
50.00
20. ' Bit_ Cry-ernte ^� -
•varies
Ps;e I Sub-Total S —
10='c�9:199' 14:Id _60644?_:;0 T011l OF aJ WIP4L�SOR
Fi-�:aE rJ'�
BOND EMMAn FORM
Bond Bond
Unit Reduction Reduction
22, Row F�icv Call
rTick LF
24, nf-r,,Fl—
RCP Cl— IY-Tnl Pig= LE tt,- 130-00
•
31
PAL UHY ENE PT M
•
■
37, •
Liii.AOL
1 —� U
• Pats Z
10i09Z199' 14:10 860644 28F1 TOWN OF ECi WZN£SlR FwGE 03
BOND ESTIMATE FORM
Bood Bond
Ucit Raduaioo Reduction
6
M
•
•
.
57,
IO' Wida
15.00
• Pa !TSub-Total S —
10.•''0�f 199? 14:10 860644722$0 Tlt4l OF _7jJ 411F@cj3p
PAGE 04
BOND ESTIKkTE
Bond Band
Unit Reduction Reduction
65- { — 0
66, swdlAa Manlale
wEA
67. Sanitary Manholt
s
71, FlaCa
ELMS: LF
72- (;u{� ta a� f
l
•
73_ End And
•
t---Quids Pon EA 100.00
ma Lfrhn
79. Fnmbbia
E4_ Ftatilig"_ ff,"
!� Maim
of Traffic I A
• ,
s-�
•� wrist
_ CD —
0 A S>l}Taai S
Z0f 09:'1997 14:10 3606447230 TO(.,,fi OF 1-530 WINCSOR PAGE 05
BOND ESTIMATE FOFLM
Bond Bond
Unit Radi ica Raduaion
I 89,
Z
Scab-Tow S !O
Sub-Taal Poe 1 S —0 —
Sub-Taal Pis 2 3 — G --
Sub-Total Pats 3 S — 0 —
Sub-Total Pais 4 S — C.D —
Ssb•ToW Pap S S i l D U ca
Sub-Total S_ 1 )00 U
O U
25%C=tk4p odes x Sub-Total: S 2 ?s a
mrAL s 3 5
pop S.
e
Tx Ii - LINE SEGMENT
N
p h' TIME TO INLET
N a TIME IN PIPE
o �
O t� ACCUMULATED TIME
G
a d
w (,� AI ENTERING
—! CATCH BASIN
N
�o O SUM OF Al
C` IN SYSTEM
N RAINFALL INTENSITY
v� c�
c� W m Q IN SYSTEM .�
a= Il cD PIPE SIZE
O
o d0 Q lC1
p LENGTH OF PIPE
SLOPE
o 0
.^
a� ` ro AVERAGE VELOCITY
S 7-
FULL CAPACITY
Q � O
j, HEADWATER
tu
c O _t-,
n L—I[I e
oN 133HS A@ 03X03H0 W2lIj 13 2iiS
$6' - CD u',�) s i ,a�Nd
31b0 Jl8 03NDIS30 103(`08d
Z'Z V460A NDIS30 W31SAS H3M3S NUOIS
96— �2— Of 7/,$CA 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer
DATE: October 2, 1998
RE: D.L. Caron Subdivision
We have reviewed the bond estimate for the D.L. Caron Subdivision and
recommend that it be set at $1,500.00.
JCl/sfg
Misc.Correspondence\Iazzetta\D.L.Caron Subdivision.doc
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers planners land surveyors
October 6, 1998
F � �
Michele Lipe y
Town of South Windsor 0g 7 1998
1540 Sullivan Avenue pgarp`�qv p
cS G.rt li"s� 9 4.6^e 19�r n
South Windsor, CT 06074 U' s �! �'pg DEPT.
Dear Michele,
Re: D & L Caron, LLC. Project No. 97-1029
65 Rye St.
South Windsor, Connecticut.
On behalf of my client, D & L Caron, I hereby request a 90 day extension from the
original filing date for recording the mylars in the office of the Town Clerk. Thank You.
Sincerely,
Design Professionals, Inc.
By: UJ icjr"�
Richard J Adams
Project Engineer
165 South Satellite Road,South Windsor CT.06074 (860)291-8755 Fax(860)291-8757 Email:dpicivil@aol.com
SOWN S'p
%M� alesgu� ?V&U/&)t
m . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
October 19, 1998
D & L Caron, L.L. C.
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re: ARpl #98-41P Maneely's, Inc. 90 day mylar extension
Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on October 13, 1998
to grant a 90-day extension for filing subdivision plans for the above-referenced
subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The original filing deadline was December 7,
1998; the new filing deadline is March 8, 1999.
State statutes authorize one additional 90-day filing extension. If you wish to request
an additional extension,,please request in writing prior to that date.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Frank A. Castro, Jr., Chairman
FAC/dlw
STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS
STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION commissioner of Public safety
2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546
Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546
Phone:
(860) 594-30.20
October 23 , 1998
D & L Caron, LLC
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Gentlemen:
Subject : Town of South Windsor
John Fitch Industrial Center
Certificate No. 868-A and Traffic Investigation Report
No. 132-9809-01 detailing conditions of the Certificate approved
at the October 20, 1998 meeting of the State Traffic Commission
are enclosed.
Additionally, enclosed are procedures for filing
Certificates on land records, to satisfy Condition No. 5 .
Very truly yours,
JQAp SanAni4el E.
Executive Director
Enclosures
CC : Chief Gary Tyler
Mr. John R. Collins
Planning and Zoning Commission
Mr. Bruce A. Hillson, P.E.
Mr. Richard J. Porth
Date f7 pages
Post-it®Fax Note 7671 `�
To
ii From a t
p A1,l 4'l.l l t-2
r'o./Dept.
Co.
Phone#
Fax#
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Printed on recycled or recovered paper
STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS
STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION commissioner of Public Safety
2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546 Commissioner of Motor vehicles
NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546
Phone: (860) 594-3020
CERTIFICATE NO. 868-A
STC NO. 132-9809-01
APPROVED October 20 , 1998
ISSUED TO: D & L Caron, LLC
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
FOR: John Fitch Industrial Center
Lots 31, 32 , 33 , 34, 42 and 42-A
Sullivan Avenue (Route 194)
Town of South Windsor
pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes
of Connecticut, as revised, and the Regulations
of the State Traffic Commission.
The applicant is hereby ordered to comply with the conditions and
requirements as set forth in the attached report and plans .
Failure to comply with all conditions and requirements will
constitute sufficient basis for revocation of the Certificate.
NO PERSON SHALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THEREOF
UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED "WITH THE ABOVE UNLESS
PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC
COMMISSION TO OPERATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND
REQUIREMENTS .
THIS CERTIFICATE WILL EXPIRE TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE APPROVAL DATE
OF THE ATTACHED REPORT UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ARE
COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION IS REQUESTED AND
OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION
DATE.
Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be
reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety.
Date: /'J/2,1/S r
J s h Santaniello, P.E.
Executive Director
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Printed on recycled or recovered paper
TR,4-10 REV 1197
Report By: MAC Date: 10/98 STATE OF CONNECTICUT STC No: 132-9809-01
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Checked By: RST Date: 10/98 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc. No:
REPORT TO THE
See Previous STC Report No. 132-8712-01 &132-8811-03 MI STATE TRAFFIC COMSSION Approved By STC
South Windsor Date: OCT 2 O 1998
Requested By: Location: John Fitch Industrial Center
D&L Caron, LLC Rye Street in the vicinity of
How Requested: Certificate
Route 194(Sullivan Avenue) rvj ov
4 J
Date: 10/25/98
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Recommendation:
In, accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as revised, it is
recommended that the State Traffic Commission issue a certificate to D & L Caron, LLC for the
addition of a 16,516 sq.ft. building and 199 parking spaces to the John Fitch Industrial Center, stating
that the operation thereof will not imperil the safety of the public.
This recommendation is referenced to the developer's plans entitled and dated as follows:
A. "Resubdivision Map" Sheet No. 3 of 11 dated July 23, 1998 prepared for D & L Caron, LLC by
Design Professionals, Inc.
B. "STC Plan" Sheet No. 1 of 1 dated October 9, 1998 prepared for Maneeley's by Design
Professionals, Inc.
C. "Topographic Map" Sheet No. 7 of 11 dated July 31, 1998 prepared for Maneeley's Inc. by
Design Professionals, Inc.
This recommendation is based upon the following conditions:
1. That condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 9 of State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8712-01,
Certificate No. 868 be rescinded.
2. That the developer install and maintain a "Stop" sign, stop bar and double yellow center line on
the site's driveway at its intersection with Rye Street, as shown on the above-referenced plans.
3. That the developer provide and maintain a clear sightline of 580 ft. to the west and 1,050 ft.to the
east from the site's driveway to be measured from a point 10 ft. back from the projected edge of
the Rye Street travelway, as shown on the above-referenced plans.
4. That the applicant locate and construct the site access drives to Rye Street and Commerce Way,
as shown on the above-referenced plans.
5. That within sixty (60) days of the issuance of a certificate, a copy thereof, together with this
report, and Certificate No. 868 issued September 20, 1988 with STC Report No. 132-8712-01 and
STC Report No. 132-8811-03 approved December 20, 1988 be recorded on the land records in
accordance with the attached procedure.
/J
By /G; j1i
- Vrvisiono Traflc Engineering
Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations
1
STC No. 132-9809-01 Town of South Windsor
6. That the State Traffic Commission reserves the right to require additional improvements or
changes, as deem necessary, due to the development's traffic in the future. The cost of any
additional improvements or changes shall be borne by the owner of the development.
Sergeant E. Thomas Field, acting on behalf of the Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South
Windsor,concurred with the above recommendation on October 16, 1998.
Mr. Bruce Hillson, the applicant's authorized representative, concurred with the above
recommendation on October 15, 1998.
2
Report of Findings
Maneeley's Banquet Facility,LLC
Town of South Windsor
STC No. 132-9809-01
Site Description:
The applicant is proposing to construct a 16,516 sq.ft. banquet and catering facility with a total of 199
parking spaces, including 6 handicapped parking spaces on a 5.38-acre parcel. The site is located on the
north side of Rye Street. Access to the site will be provided via a stop-controlled drive on Rye Street.
Secondary access will be provided by a gravel drive through lot No. 34 to Commerce Way.
John Fitch Industrial Center was issued Certificate No. 868 on September 20, 1988 for 270,000 sq.ft.
of gross floor area and approximately 500 parking spaces. Presently, 192,692 sq.ft. of development has
been constructed leaving 77,308 sq.ft. of allowable development within the 38.5 acre industrial center. It
appears that the original owner of the John Fitch Industrial Center has sold the remaining sites and
additional land adjacent to the approved development. D & L Caron LCC is presently proposing
development of a 16,516 sq.ft. facility on a 5.38 acre parcel, which is part of a 16.86 acre resubdivision
that includes approximately 3 acres approved under Certificate No. 868.
Generated Traffic:
This addition to the John Fitch Industrial Center is expected to generate an additional 160 vehicle
trips during the Friday peak period (144 entering and 16 exiting). During the Saturday peak period, this
addition is expected to generate an additional 320 vehicle trips (160 entering and 160 exiting). Sixty-
seven percent(67%) of the generated traffic is expected to travel Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) northwest
of Rye Street, thirty-three percent (33%) is expected to travel Route 194 southeast of Rye Street. These
projections were reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Policy and Planning.
Department of Transportation Observations and Concerns:
State project No. 132-116, which was completed on February 28, 1996, widened the intersection of
Route 5 (John Fitch Boulevard) at Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue). Route 5 was widened to four lanes
including an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane on the
northbound approach and dual left-turn lanes, one exclusive through lane and a shared through right-turn
lane on the southbound approach. Route 194 was widened to three lanes including an exclusive left-turn
lane, a shared left-through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane on its westbound approach to Route 5.
Route 194 was also widened to two lanes on its eastbound approach to Rye Street. These improvements
were in excess of what was required under the original certificate and the original developer of the John
Fitch Industrial Center was not asked to participate in this work.
Based on a review of the submitted traffic volumes and those expected from the remaining
undeveloped portion of the industrial center, a traffic signal is not warranted at the intersection of Route
194 at Rye Street. Level-of-Service is acceptable at the intersections of Route 5 at Route 194, Route 194
at Commerce Way and Route 194 at Rye Street. The Town of South Windsor does not see a need to
widen Rye Street to two lanes or provide bypass area at Commerce Way at this time. Therefore, it has
been recommended to rescind previous conditions requiring these improvements.
Since there is no required off-site improvements a bond will not be required.
3
1 '
STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS
STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Commissioner of Public Safety
�'••r .:°�� 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546
Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546
Phone: - --�
(860) 594-3020
- October 23 , 1998"
CT 1998
k s Rr� 9 .4yy
Caron, LLC " 0
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Gentlemen:
Subject : Town of South Windsor
John Fitch Industrial Center
Certificate No. 868-A and Traffic Investigation Report
No. 132-9809-01 detailing conditions of the Certificate approved
at the October 20, 1998 meeting of the State Traffic Commission
are enclosed.
Additionally, enclosed are procedures for filing
Certificates on land records, to satisfy Condition No. 5 .
Very truly yours,
d4�4 /a�-�`��
Joseph Santaniello, P.E.
Executive Director
Enclosures
CC : Chief Gary Tyler
Mr. John R. Collins
Planning and Zoning Commission
Mr. Bruce A. Hillson, P.E.
Mr. Richard J. Porth
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Primed on recycled or recovered paper
STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS
STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION commissioner of public safety
�'•••.. .. 2800 BERLIN TURNPIKE, P.O. BOX 317546 Commissioner of Motor vehicles
NEWINGTON, CT 06131-7546
Phone: (860) 594-3020
CERTIFICATE NO. 868-A
STC NO. 132-9809-01
APPROVED October 20 , 1998
ISSUED TO: D & L Caron, LLC
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
FOR: John Fitch Industrial Center
Lots 31, 32 , 33 , 34, 42 and 42-A
Sullivan Avenue (Route 194)
Town of South Windsor
pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes
of Connecticut, as revised, and the Regulations
of the State Traffic Commission.
The applicant is hereby ordered to comply with the conditions and
requirements as set forth in the attached report and plans .
Failure to comply with all conditions and requirements will
constitute sufficient basis for revocation of the Certificate.
NO PERSON SHALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THEREOF
UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ABOVE UNLESS
PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC
COMMISSION TO OPERATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND
REQUIREMENTS .
THIS CERTIFICATE WILL EXPIRE TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE APPROVAL DATE
OF THE ATTACHED REPORT UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ARE
COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION IS REQUESTED AND
OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION
DATE.
Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be
reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety.
Date: I°j2-,115 Y
J s h Santaniello, P.E.
Executive Director
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Printed on recycled or recovered paper
TRA-10 REV 1197
Report By: MAC Date: 10/98 STATE OF CONNECTICUT STC No: 132-9809-01
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Checked By: RST Date: 10/98 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc. No:
REPORT TO THE
See Previous STC Report No. 132-8712-01 &132-8811-03 STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Approved By STC
South Windsor Date: OCT 2 O 1998
Requested By: Location: John Fitch Industrial Center
D&L Caron, LLC Rye Street in the vicinity of
How Requested: Certificate r
Route 194(Sullivan Avenue) `Jy,�,.
4
Date: 10/25/98
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Recommendation:
In. accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as revised, it is
recommended that the State Traffic Commission issue a certificate to D & L Caron, LLC for the
addition of a 16,516 sq.ft. building and 199 parking spaces to the John Fitch Industrial Center, stating
that the operation thereof will not imperil the safety of the public.
This recommendation is referenced to the developer's plans entitled and dated as follows:
A. "Resubdivision Map" Sheet No. 3 of 11 dated July 2.3, 1998 prepared for D & L Caron, LLC by
Design Professionals,Inc.
B. "STC Plan" Sheet No. 1 of 1 dated October 9, 1998 prepared for Maneeley's by Design
Professionals, Inc.
C. "Topographic Map" Sheet No. 7 of 11 dated July 31, 1998 prepared for Maneeley's Inc. by
Design Professionals, Inc.
This recommendation is based upon the following conditions:
1. That condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 9 of State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8712-01,
Certificate No. 868 be rescinded.
2. That the developer install and maintain a "Stop" sign, stop bar and double yellow center line on
the site's driveway at its intersection with Rye Street, as shown on the above-referenced plans.
3. That the developer provide and maintain a clear sightline of 580 ft.to the west and 1,050 ft. to the
east from the site's driveway to be measured from a point 10 ft. back from the projected edge of
the Rye Street travelway, as shown on the above-referenced plans.
4. That the applicant locate and construct the site access drives to Rye Street and Commerce Way,
as shown on the above-referenced plans.
5. That within sixty (60) days of the issuance of a certificate, a copy thereof, together with this
report, and Certificate No. 868 issued September 20, 1988 with STC Report No. 132-8712-01 and
STC Report No. 132-8811-03 approved December 20, 1988 be recorded on the land records in
accordance with the attached procedure.
By Z;11;1116LJ14t
--division o rra id- ng ne�ermg
Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations
1
STC No. 132-9809-01 Town of South Windsor
6. That the State Traffic Commission reserves the right to require additional improvements or
changes, as deem necessary, due to the development's traffic in the future. The cost of any
additional improvements or changes shall be borne by the owner of the development.
Sergeant E. Thomas Field, acting on behalf of the Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South
Windsor,concurred with the above recommendation on October 16, 1998.
Mr. Bruce Hillson, the applicant's authorized representative, concurred with the above
recommendation on October 15, 1998.
2
Report of Findings
Maneeley's Banquet Facility,LLC
Town of South Windsor
STC No. 132-9809-01
Site Description:
The applicant is proposing to construct a 16,516 sq.ft. banquet and catering facility with a total of 199
parking spaces, including 6 handicapped parking spaces on a 5.38-acre parcel. The site is located on the
north side of Rye Street. Access to the site will be provided via a stop-controlled drive on Rye Street.
Secondary access will be provided by a gravel drive through lot No. 34 to Commerce Way.
John Fitch Industrial Center was issued Certificate No. 868 on September 20, 1988 for 270,000 sq.ft.
of gross floor area and approximately 500 parking spaces. Presently, 192,692 sq.ft. of development has
been constructed leaving 77,308 sq.ft. of allowable development within the 38.5 acre industrial center. It
appears that the original owner of the John Fitch Industrial Center has sold the remaining sites and
additional land adjacent to the approved development. D & L Caron LCC is presently proposing
development of a 16,516 sq.ft. facility on a 5.38 acre parcel, which is part of a 16.86 acre resubdivision
that includes approximately 3 acres approved under Certificate No. 868.
Generated Traffic:
This addition to the John Fitch Industrial Center is expected to generate an additional 160 vehicle
trips during the Friday peak period (144 entering and 16 exiting). During the Saturday peak period, this
addition is expected to generate an additional 320 vehicle trips (160 entering and 160 exiting). Sixty-
seven percent(67%) of the generated traffic is expected to travel Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) northwest
of Rye Street, thirty-three percent (33%) is expected to travel Route 194 southeast of Rye Street. These
projections were reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Policy and Planning.
Department of Transportation Observations and Concerns:
State project No. 132-116, which was completed on February 28, 1996, widened the intersection of
Route 5 (John Fitch Boulevard) at Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue). Route 5 was widened to four lanes
including an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane on the
northbound approach and dual left-turn lanes, one exclusive through lane and a shared through right-turn
lane on the southbound approach. Route 194 was widened to three lanes including an exclusive left-turn
lane, a shared left-through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane on its westbound approach to Route 5.
Route 194 was also widened to two lanes on its eastbound approach to Rye Street. These improvements
were in excess of what was required under the original certificate and the original developer of the John
Fitch Industrial Center was not asked to participate in this work.
Based on a review of the submitted traffic volumes and those expected from the remaining
undeveloped portion of the industrial center, a traffic signal is not warranted at the intersection of Route
194 at Rye Street. Level-of-Service is acceptable at the intersections of Route 5 at Route 194, Route 194
at Commerce Way and Route 194 at Rye Street. The Town of South Windsor does not see a need to
widen Rye Street to two lanes or provide bypass area at Commerce Way at this time. Therefore, it has
been recommended to rescind previous conditions requiring these improvements.
Since there is no required off-site improvements a bond will not be required.
3
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON l7E1>l GN PapmptaL.4 .S Phone No.
Address W5 "-x,0TH � �-1 ry- Pow
Site Name P&Z No.
Owner ,Q "C f-iL,4AL Phone No.
Contractor
Signature of OwnerALI . Date: l/-
Signature of Design Engr. Dater ll--Z4--98
CHANGE: (Describe location and nature 4f change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
tut S� -7Qr 8 " )Q!,o'I o.
/�t t� �•2o�r�,C_ /AJ ��cGs s s o z. BPS
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
�7 S rt vas'i
APPROVALS: (As Require )
Dir.. Of Planninf'` Daterh', c?
Town Engineer ,69 Date: l
Dir. of Public r s OKI Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
/!G v.,�� �l F lea�;� ►r•z.�.,.��-�. � � �% �S .
Y
I
�t
ENG.DEPT.
White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering 'D` tfnent
C 3 \
x
` 81.0 z 9 5 \
/`�'S CAA .:...
y 150 x 79.75 s 6 \f
X
.7 79.5 CB#4 \
M.,r
loptvr
4sE,y y 425 g,�,N� 0
`-78 GREASE TRAP Js- \w 80.75
0 0 �Aos �c4
A S CB#5 !6s CB#1
i 0 C 2 8,-15" CPPS ® 0.5X.
—15" CP_ PS®0.5R 79.15 64�ti5 CP
B#7 a5x CB#6 0
6� o
B#8
a w
79.5 f-
9.5 x x
80.5 0.75X / \
8.5 `� 80.5 x
X 813.5D�
SIGN 8 75
/ ;9.75
81 50
79.5 2.2
0 _
^,
i` 79 _ / / /�j'd .-�� STORM DRAINAGI
_ /
��e� / SNET-700 CB TYPE T
3 R 79
sa C T C
2 C 79.!
CCL5 4 C 78.
SNET 5 C 79.
`J 1699 TR 6 C 79.
7 C 78.
8 C 78.
SNET 10 SED 77
1698 LT
11 Cl_ 79
12 SED 78
TD 77
FE 1
FE 2
FE 3
FE 4
rt
1�
IP TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON J�F-ot hi RLZJ Phone No. S 3-3-7
Address _Z MAj-j-0.PJ-,N L)68 .- �OVT\ w t�►t�5r>t2, G�
Site Name MAt4EF-LC-/`1 P&Z No.
Owner L3RvcT=- MA 4F;R t,,,S1 Phone No
Contractor
Signature of Owner Date:
Signature of Design Engr. Date:
CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
1) CAAA,G- It AQtASTQo 6 MAP Ei5 Ta it i3aA>7t=oRfl a,-J4►Z SAME stzE= �-
_l Arz-i t.AGF- AuRmIA,66 j'3c7Si+ wi TH ILEX CO"IMC14 C r#O�ty J 54MF 5i ZE 1-
33 Rt;7Lprr jcj Gly
sm (:cxe.DML-Q SmuxE Wi m FRAStr-5r2. E_IR 314ML sizes .;
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
Ya AD33 Ccoj-OR T® EhtTAA+-V-' FbA1 Py%crn
:z) A00u.:G -TkjE al-ex t..at►.t_ C i yF C=snaGP&E / AiPPEA%66<Z, _AAeW6 811,i� 50',
WA►A& 7-h' - LjiAj7TUk
3 i TO r,,jA-7cq 1� ?Q' Fnilsjael t3kMtN6 =,Aj FOR i,3HoTU
APPROVALS: (As Required) �
Dir. Of Planning �� � /A.d.i� Date: Aj Z.Z
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public Works Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
� 1
14
White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant S, V
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering D
4OwM a
o
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786
��OsoR.co AREA CODE 8 6 0/6 44-2 5 1 1
FAX 860/644-3781
July 7, 1999
D &L Caron, L.L.C.
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re: Appl#98-41P,Maneely's Site—Landscaping Bond
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on June 29, 1999, to reduce the
landscaping bond from $5,000 to $1,000.
Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Sue Larsen, Chairperson
SL/dlw
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
)�ECV
JUL 8i WIND7P
O
m 70-Wf_1 aie SOUL4 ?dt;fl
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074,2786
R.co AREA CODE 860/644-2511
FAX 860/644-3781
November 10, 1999
Mr. Bruce Maneeley
Maneeley's, Inc.
65 Rye Street
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Maneeley:
Re: Appl #96-41 P, Maneeley's, Inc.
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 26, 1999 to
release the landscaping bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of $1,000.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary
contact person(s) will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning
Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Y
Sue W. Larsen, Chairperson
Planning and Zoning Commission
cc: Town Engineer
A lc c. '&*d
04d
1 Z1249
ee y
ecialt'!
Parties Are pur p iOCT 3 �y�,
October 20, 1999
Planning Department
1640 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Attn: Michelle
Dear Michelle:
This is in regards to the landscaping bonds for Maneeley's Banquet and Catering Facility
located at 65 Rye Street in South Windsor, CT.
We are requesting that the landscaping be viewed and upon final inspection, please return
the landscaping bonds to us.
If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me.
Thank you
Yours truly,
Bruce A. Maneeley
President
65 Rye Street, South Windsor, CT 06074
Phone (860) 52-PARTY Fax (860) 291-9362
Aj t�wN d�'
c � 0.1 Sau� V&U&ot
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786
'��soR.cO AREA CODE 860/644-2511
FAX 860/644-3781
July 7, 1999
D &L Caron, L.L.C.
359 Burnham Street
East Hartford, CT 06028
Dear Madam/Sir:
Re: Appl#98-41P, Maneely's Site—Landscaping Bond
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on June 29, 1999, to reduce the
landscaping bond from$5,000 to $1,000.
Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Sue Larsen, Chairperson
SL/dlw
cc: Town Engineer
Chief Building Official
C '
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE.
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL: pp.
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON 0*%C►J Phone Nq Zq l-$A,
Address 14OPo 45:;, 'l'vi t.16 tom. lz1"� 1 ,t t► cam.
Site Name t �.i �4. �+ t►.� . . P&Z No.
Owner. Phone No. a�J - l�►G►
Contractor ✓
Signature of Owner e:: 40- a
Signature of Design En r.' ✓ Date _�,p-�1 - �
CHANGE: (:Describe location and n to a of change. include.
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) :
.Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
92.
Gf �+�
C /?,. 4rd cZ A119 !:. 1.�.d a rx tau ,S.esG�l.
APPROVALS: (As Req 'red) ,
.Dir. Of Planning Date
Town Engineer
Dir. of Pub1iC rks Date
Others: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS
7 .
White Town Engineer Yellow Applicant;.
r
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod' - Engineering Department
� Q
Ca
LIM
f \: im
ON
�FANWA!i
MAIM
�. A. ` .
1� w �-
Zit fit qw
IA Oil,
ra �� �aq0 •
, oopp0O4,9=y,
a ►��� �'i We
p0 OOp
/mow r w.�(Ji�►'
S 0*1NT-own o-P SouLlt ?d&zdAat
Sf+
0
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
R.0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511
October 18, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission
FROM: John E. McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer
RE: Application #89-41W, Beldon Road
On October 18, 1989 I contacted Doug Cooper, Water Resources Unit,
Department of Environmental Protection regarding the existing swales
on the property referenced above. In our conversation we discussed
the natural characteristics of the swales. Based on my indication
that the presence of standing water is for a duration "larger than
just the storm incident" , it is his opinion that, "the swales should
be declared intermittent watercourses" . This does not preclude the
possibility for future development, but would provide for regulatory
control of the activity.
Enclosure
cc: Doug Cooper, Water Resources Unit
Department of Environmental Protection
Room 117, State Office Building
Hartford, CT 06106
Paul Capuano
John Ianni, Highland Soils
Design Professionals
Wetland Commissioner' s Training Workshop - Regulated Areas
I . Connecticut' s Inland Wetland Law
A. Two part law - protects wetlands and watercourses.
B. Definitions for "wetlands" - keyed to USDA soil
descriptions.
C. I Watercourses: defined physical feature - river, lake,
stream, . pond; or biological/botanical des ires ption -
swamp, marsh, ko-g.
Additionally, all natural and artificial waterways,
ditches and canals are regulated as watercourses.
Common sense must be utilized when dealing with the
upper reaches of intermittent or artificial
watercourses. Was the intent of the law to regulate
existing storm drain piping networks that flow only
during the storm incident?; we think not. [note: ,;
problems with pollution, siltation, and construction of
such facilities can be dealt with through other
avenues, (i.e. other local laws, ordinances or
enforcement actions) ] operationally, the DEP Water
Resources Unit bases its ruling, of the upper limit
definition of an "intermittent" watercourse on the
following criteria:
�. 1) presence of the waterway on United States
Geological Survey (USGS) , Soil Conservation
Service (SCS) , National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
or other natural resource maps and data.
2) physical appearance of waterway in the field,
(defined channel, scour, deposits of recent
alluvium and detritus) .
3 ) presence of water, or a soil moisture regime,
which is persistent enough to begin the process of
hydric soil formation, (has "reduction" in soil
begun to take place?) .
4 ) presence of standing water or flow for a
duration "longer--than just the storm incident" ,
(i.e. flow of water supported by some component,
however small, of groundwater outflow or
ex-filtration) .
5) presence of hydrophytic vegetation.
pow M. aF,`
• 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
'NOsoR-c° TELEPHONE (860) 644-2511
May 19, 2005
Judy Schuler
Design Professionals
165 South Satellite Road
South Windsor, CT 06074 Via Fax 291-8757
Re: Maneeley's site plan change order
Dear Judy,
I have reviewed the plans for addition to Maneeley's Caterers at 65 Rye Street and I have the
following comments:
✓1. Label the overhead doors on the north side of the proposed addition.
Is there ari existing drainage pipe that runs between the EX CB with at TF 80.02 and the EX
Drainage Structure with a TF 77.00. Will this pipe be removed or plugged? Label it accordingly.
Will the proposed sanitary sewer force main pass under the proposed 12"drainage pipe? Please
clarify this and label the plans.
. :' Additional details are needed for the proposed pump chamber including the pump model, head
and flow proposed, storage volume and elevations or levels for the Pump Off, Pump On and High
Water Alarm floats.
r,"his pump chamber needs a connection for an external portable power supply.
.6. Clean-outs are needed in the proposed force main at bends and every 100 feet.
'x the direction of flow arrow in the Force Main Connection Detail.
In easement for the sanitary sewer force main must be provided over the property fronting on
/ Commerce Way.
�9. Provide elevations of the proposed building addition for review and approval.
vId. An application must be submitted to the WPCA for review and approval for this modification.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely, `F
of
r
Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E.
Town Engineer
Cc: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control
1—
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors
gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects
June 3, 2005
Jeff Doolittle,P.E., Town Engineer
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Connecticut
RE: Maneeley's Building Addition
65 Rye Street
South Windsor, Connecticut
DPI Project No. 1029
Dear Jeff,
The plans for the above referenced project were revised per your comments dated May 19,2005. Attached
are the change order form and four copies of the revised plans(revised to 6-1-05). The following are like
numbered responses to your comments from the May 19, 2005 letter:
1. Overhead doors labeled.
,2. The revised plan depicts the actual site conditions for the storm pipe per our client, Mr. Bruce
Maneeley. Per our understanding,the two catch basins discharge to an existing holding tank.
a proposed storm drainage pipe was unnecessary and removed from the plan.
Additional pump and chamber details are shown on the revised plans.
Per our client,a generator has been installed and they are planning on connecting the existing
building and proposed addition(including the pump chamber)to the generator.
Cleanouts are not required for a sanitary force main.
Flow arrow revised on plan detail.
F r. 8. A 15 feet easement is depicted on the attached plan.
t` . Elevations are attached as part of the change order.
1W A WPCA application has been submitted. Copies of the revised plan will be forwarded to Mr.
Fred Shaw.
We hope this addresses all outstanding comments. Please call if you have any questions or need anything
further.
Sincerely,
Jud . S uler, .E.
oject anager
cc: Fred Shaw(2 copies of revised plans for the WPCA application)
Bruce Maneeley
165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Tel: (860)291-8755•Fax: (860)291-8757
Email:dpicivil@aol.com
TOWN OF SOM WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
r: FOR. SITE' A 'SUM VISION
GENERAL: . �!
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT_ PERSON MfgSiRWA Rhone No. 6t3�3
�Addre' s.s '/�', ' so U r" :g A"r6J 1- /T 0 b .X,&rd41_144
Site Name N1AM F L Y 'S 4 P&Z No.
g"" �
Owner � � w<;a � n-5Z8•G�y�
Phone No:
Contractor
Signature of Owner ` - Date: `,
t Signature of Design n Date: I / Tago _y. �..
CRANGE: . (Describe locati d at a of change. Include``
Four (4) copies of; plan/profile 'of Change. )
f 17aa % A Aj 12. A.4r4 e A
Ilk
R Ar
7a
Y ason for Change: (Why is change required)
iAM�21 Tr l lst 1 L. R , =&A61 A A AJ� hj A�X,i7"�A�.�1J l� �OE 4
3
APPROVALS:; 'CAE Required) ,
Dir. Of Planning Date:
Torn .Engineer Lr Date:
Dir. of Public Wo s, Date.: .
Other: Dates 1
ST#XF "COMMENTS
7
r
Wh iter Town Engineer Yellow --.Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department'
+. ;:.�'s..x,.,tiY'c3i•�r.-ae,.�crfii3 3ti.,3� h" -=' :4zifa a Y3 tc;'���.aa. -_%:�7�'a6•- •;� t� zffi+..,.iY a...-"ice?�z�:a:__a�sF*3af ��'l-��sxt�"3g'. �-+�"+,�i xsr,�e..�
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS, INC.
civil engineers ♦ planners ♦ surveyors
gis ♦ gps ♦ landscape architects
April 4, 2003 /
Ms. Michele Lipe,Deputy Director of Planning
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
RECEIVED
RE: Maneeley's Catering
65 Rye Street APR 0 7 Z003
South Windsor, Connecticut
DPI Project No. 1029 SOUTH WINDSOR pIANNING DEPT.
Dear Michele,
Please be advised that there is monumentation at all corners of the above-referenced lot. We
understand that the $1,600.00 bond may now be released. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Richard P. Martel, P.E., L.S.
Principal
cc: Bruce Maneeley
Peter DeMallie
165 South Satellite Road, South Windsor,Connecticut 06074
Tel:(860)291-8755 •Fax:(860)291-8757
Email:dpicivil@aol.com
r
�5C U
`1
Parties Are Our Business
Maneeley's Banquets&Catering e s t. 1 9 a s
65 Rye Street
South Windsor,CT 06074
(860)52 PARTY
Fax:(860)291-9362
www.maneeleys.com
e-mail: info@maneeleys.com
March 6, 2003
Town of South Windsor
To whom it may concern
Please release the landscaping lien of this property at 65 Rye Street, South
Windsor.
Thank you,
Bruce A. Maneeley
BAM/sbw ` (
q�W N Se
TOV,'On 0-19 SOU-6(1, ?d&&-46,0t
a
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR•c0 AREA CODE 860/644-2511
April 22, 2003 RECEIVED
MAY 2 3 2003
Mr. Bruce Maneeley
SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT,
Maneeley's Banquet Facility
65 Rye Street
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Maneeley:
Re: Appl#98-41P,Maneeley's Banquet Facility
This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on April 15, 2003, to release the
subdivision bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$1,600.00.
Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s)
will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext.
252. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kevin McCann, Chairman
Planning be 'Zoning Commission
KMcC/kah
cc: Town Engineer
f
a
II h
f � )
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON 0eS►4aL kor-"S►aw44 Phone No. Z9I AlS,57
Address_►&S e_—,ocrr►-t t L-MLL-vry- IZr> -5pul-H
Site Name P&Z No.
Owner Phone No. 5 ZS
Contractor
Signature of Owner e: <e- Zz ,
Signature of Design En r. Dater to-p-1-2B
CHANGE: (Describe location and n to a of change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
Locoe2 Ag" 0A-- a82 I ¢T f
Reason for Change: (Why is change required)
APPROVALS: (As Requared) {
Dir. Of Plannin A Date: h V
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public erks Date:
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS:
White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
LINE SEGMENT
a a.
:FA
TIME TO INLET
c� w TIME IN PIPE
o �
O s� ACCUMULATED TIME
G
a d
w w w Al ENTERING
CATCH BASIN
N
�o O SUM OF AI
` IN SYSTEM
N RAINFALL INTENSITY
m W m Q IN SYSTEM .�
= _ (D I PIPE SIZE
p LENGTH OF PIPE
� O
SLOPE
0
C o
ro AVERAGE VELOCITY
J FULL CAPACITY
HEADWATER
�Wl
'n
oN 133HS Ae 03)(03H0 W2iII l3lis
31vo A8 03NDIS30 103f'08'd
4
Z'Z WaOA N!7 iS30 W 31SAS i33/Ml3S W idO1S
b�G1i -86
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL: (�
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON 17Es14N Phone No.
Address 101% 1950V7'04 Awra 4.c : T'y— 1zy0-4;�
Site Name P&Z No.
Owner Lj e P Phone No.
Contractor DM MG. fTkt-, U N
Signature of Owner .; If Date:
.Signature of Design Engr. Dates
CHANGE: (Describe location and nat re f change. Include
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) � �f
j /"I �►�+I sue.t+ f*�1t► "• {�
Reason for Change: (Why is
change required)
APPROVALS: (As Require )
Dir. Of Plannin Date:
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public ores C Dater
Other: Date:
STAFF COMMENTS-
is-f,V4 j' . 'a ,1.wn r L. d Z�L 4'*s
White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department
C 3 \ _
d
x81.0 79.5 \ �"
~s x
N�'�Ssso o x79.75 sa \ \
x \
.7 'i,`r �, 79.5 CB#4 \
78. GREASE TRAP O / M V>j3 r1 w $0.75 s�'o
0 as Q
Nv,�+• S CB#5 'ss CB#1
C Z 8'�15' CPPS ® 0.5X
-15' CPPS O 0.5% 79.15 6k'15 cP
B#7 B#6
04 10 GQ? v
B#8 �
79.5 4
9.5 x
80.5 0.75K / \
8.5 '` 80.5 x x 8A 5n�
SIGN 8 .75
R ;9.75
\\ 81 50 i
',9.5 It2.2
r �
'�. 79 i� /�� STORM DRAINAGI
•�` �Z•2 J~� / SNET CB TYPE T
3TR 1 C 79.`
C 79.
SNET
4 C 78.
1699 TR 5 C
6 C 79.
7 C 78.
8 C 78.
I '�' E aTR M.—'.!N 78
SNET F� 1e sE� 77
1698 L7
11 CL 79
12 SED 78
TD 1 77
FE 1
FE 2
FE 3
FE 4
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
STAFF SITE CHANGE
FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION
GENERAL:
CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON Mao N RoLs y' Phone No.
Address Z MAI-i- 0-f' 1 0 Scy,nti w that Sc>R, CT
Site Name MAP4M.V`+ -S P&Z No. � .V/
Owner faRu V- MANEr V,*;-'7. Phone No.
Contractor SCE '
Signature of Owner Date:
Signature of Design Engr. A Date
CHANGE: Describe location and nature of change. Include
( g
Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. )
t. C NA i 11 Rt j-tgo c, MApj& TCa 11 13RA .0 PC-A*. SAME
RIMAM 19 60tf1m Cr,&.OQAOO 'SP$WM WITM F1AA5e*A A'#P 34r r- Si
Reason for Change (Why is change required)
1)TO AOO CCvuoft /F�-P.r-ANC E to VAN f1XAt.M FoA P ti't+CJ
3 To r*41c" t S`-2p, r4gstrAo ipmenvz ,tom F,.? iot4are..,
APPROVALS (As Req fired)
Dir.. Of Planning Date: .w
Town Engineer Date:
Dir. of Public Works Date:
Other. Dates
STAFF COMMENTS:
White - Town Engineer Yellow Applicant
Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department