Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
T C (147)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM D Application No. : 97- 9 9 P Date Received: /)-%-97 [)EC 9 1997 Action/Public Hearing by: Receipt No. South Windsor APPLICANT: Planning & toning Commission `T���jZ�z v � I•�?�L S L l/��" ADDRESS: cJ.J C7 ©,�Q �¢ OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS R62, 7--- d ADDRESS: COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Assessor's Map # Parcel # ZoneAla NAME, ADDRESS, & TEL & FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INOUIR.IES SHOULD BE 6d 3 ,S�f ?9 DIRECTED: d- < _9 f� e Sl �'1�� r _ Z C & THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply) : ' ��� f-� T�" � _1. Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) 2. Subdivision/Resubdivision a. _ Subdivision _ Minor Major b. _ Resubdivision Minor _ Major (Public Hearing Required) c. _ Conditional Approval d. _ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) _3. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) _4. Site Plan of Development _5. General Plan of Development _6. Earth Filling [Sec. 151 and/or Earth Removal [Sec. 141 (Public Hearing Req) _7. Regulation Amendment: Zoning Subdivision _8. Amendment to Town Plan of Development _9. Temporary and Conditional Permit _10. Other (explain in detail) : -rt+c WAgo,\J [6,t� Applicant Property Owner r (Sege reverse side for additional information) Watson House T & C Permit Amendment I 1. Request for approval of modifications to the Temporary and Conditional Permit granted in February 1997. The effective date of the T & C Permit was the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy; that occurred on July 1, 1997, so this permit is valid until July 1, 1999. 2. The original permit was for a Bed and Breakfast facility, with the following conditions: ♦ The residential character of the dwelling unit and property must be maintained. ♦ The maximum length of stay shall be 14 days consecutively per calendar year per guest. ♦ One nonlighted wooden sign, of a design that is compatible with the design of the dwelling and not to exceed 4 square feet is allowed. ♦ No meals other than breakfast shall be provided; and guest rooms may not contain provisions for cooking. No meals shall be provided to the general public if not guests of the Bed & Breakfast. ♦ An owner must live on the premises 3. The requested modifications include approvals to: ♦ rent out the 3rd floor apartment, ♦ provide room and board to employees of the bed &breakfast, and ♦ host small indoor events, maximum size 40 people, with on-site parking for 15 cars and no parking on Main Street or Sullivan Avenue. 44. The Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal have indicated that there is some work to the rear stair that would have to be done prior to an approval from them for the use of these areas for apartments. They also indicated that there are no code concerns regarding use of the specific areas of the premises for weddings and parties, provided that the number of guests is not higher than approximately 40 people. Further, they noted that the time of stay at the B & B has no building code implications, since as a B & B it is already designed to maximum code requirements for occupancy. 5. The Temporary & Conditional Permit regulations themselves provide no guidance regarding the suitability or appropriateness of any proposed uses, since by their very nature T & C permits are meant to address something unexpected or different. Therefore, the Commission must use its own judgment regarding what is reasonable for this site. 6. Planning Department staff s only concern with this application is that there be no on-street parking for any events, if the Commission approves the requested modifications. WATSON HOUSE T & C MODIFICATION APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. The third floor may be temporarily rented as an apartment, limited to occupancy by two people maximum. This is not intended to be a long- term rental, but rather an interim accommodation while the remainder of the bed & breakfast operation is being established. 2. Two live-in employees for the bed and breakfast operation are allowed. NV or oth r 4446hs-are 1 provi d 44iat._al n�e � - he eunoidfl s t 0�r,�,V-d Ce*d ,, b - ��c sir �G,r P _ dor r � r � . , .� pArO ii � y s .fir lc r v T _t i Mr. Canted c s 1-e- 46 �n `�u�--- tom, 6p,, l M r-, �Tob,n, z�— 3 `V vK.c Ci iM c/je, cLk- e r ell tee i C� e s C.Ol1CQ/LIf -tkk LJ n, /4-oi,�- P-th� ;S i�IQ P-eA-Vl� fr-L 714, At�,e� - D-x, , i 1 i r -t j C � J J W uI- , ,, a4lt2 • co pt�k�- OL- LA l /A��® �■3hJy� I J n� _ '' ^^ f -� t,4-- �, j 06J� ,ate ,c 1),�c4; 7J® -- Ova-, v TW-A • ILAA ,l �h 1goq St-, CT- u)c,+^.dS--oz_ ; RECEIVED FEB 24 t990 - 1225 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 February 21 , 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Commission Members , We are opposed to all "Considerations" Robert Tobin is asking of the Planning and Zoning Commission, through a letter written by him dated November 10, 1997. In our mind Bed and Breakfast is exactly as stated: spend the night ; have breakfast served by the host/hostess that lives at the residence; and go about your travels . Would anyone, anywhere in South Windsor, want their next door neighbor (in a residential zone) catering parties, weddings , and special events? And how about the extended noise, traffic, and general nuisance of motor vehicles and large grougs of people year round? Zoning Board members; there is a big difference between B & B and all the extras that Robert Tobin is requesting! Do not grant these exceptions ! Shame on Mr. Tobin. He is stated as saying (Htfd. Business Journal, 01/26/98) , "I love this old house . The area is fantastic . " If he feels this way he wouldn' t convert the carriage house to apartments ; rent the 3rd floor; and park cars up and down Main St. , So, Windsor ! S-.i�ncerer, lsie and Richard Woolam t OVIN se" 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•COr� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 February 24, 1997 CERTIFIED MAIL Robert A. Tobin 1 East Lane, Apt. 1 Bloomfield, CT 06002 Dear Mr. Tobin: Re: Appl #9.7-09P, Temporary & Conditional Perfnit Bed& Breakfast Facility 1876 Main Street At the February 18, 1997 meeting of the South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission, your request for a two year temporary and conditional permit to operate a Bed and Breakfast facility in a building known as the "Watson House" (A-40 zone) has been granted subject to the following terms and conditions: I. This approval is valid for two years from date of issuance of a.Certificate of Occupancy. 2. The residential character of the dwelling unit and property must be maintained. 3. The maximum length of stay shall be fourteen (14) days consecutively per calendar year per guest. 4. One nonlighted wooden sign, of a design that is compatible with the design of the dwelling and not to exceed 4 square feet, is allowed. 5. No meals other than breakfast shall be provided; and guest rooms may not contain provisions for cooking. No meals shall be provided to the general public if not guests of the Bed & Breakfast. 6. A landscape bond in the amount of$1,000 is required and must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. An engineered site plan detailing parking lot design and construction must be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission for planning/engineering approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Evergreen screening around the parking area is required. This plan is also to be reviewed by the Architectural Design & Review Committee. 8. Driveway shall be gravel/non bituminous. 9. An owner must live on the premises. c0 - IG MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Bob Tobin,Manager,The Watson House Subject: Modifications to the Original Temporary and Conditional Permit for The Watson House Date: November 10, 1997 Since our meeting with you last month,we have decided to put down on paper all the ideas that we've had around potential business uses of The Watson House. Some of these are new ideas, some are ones we've discussed. I've organized them into one's that we'd like the commission to consider now,and those that we'd like to approach in the future. I though it prudent to get everything`out on the table' now, so that we can approach this properly,following a process that the commission approves. Thank you for considering the following: For Consideration Now: 1. Elimination of the 14 day time limit for overnight stays. We have found that flexibility in this area will provide a service in great demand by our corporate clients(i.e. accommodating longer term stays),while at the same time,not impacting the historic and residential character of the neighborhood. 2. Allowing weddings,parties and special events to be held at the inn. Approved parking would include the Inn's graveled lot and driveway areas and existing commuter parking along Main Street. We propose the maximum size for these events to not exceed 50 people. 3. Approval for permanently renting out the 3rd floor apartment. 4. Recognition that inn keepers will be hired to assist in the daily operations of the inn,and as part of their compensation,room and board may be providea. 5. Recognition that we are interested in converting the existing T&C to permanent zoning when it expires. We understand that an amendment that would address this is pending. Guidance on the necessary next steps to be considered for this is requested. 6. Signage change approval as follows: replacement of existing sign with lamp post(with the sign attached to the post-already approved by historic society),mail box sign, `B&B' sign added to the existing`John Watson'Bicentennial plaque on the house and a special events sign(displayed occasionally)on Route 5 by the Chamber of Commerce sign on the corner of Sullivan Avenue and Route 5. For Consideration In The Future: 1. Use of the carriage house for special events(it would be renovated to serve as a patio/gazebo)and eventual modifications for inn keeper quarters-subject to Historic Society approval. 2. Approval for allowing the consignment of antiques by dealers at the inn for purchase by customers. In addition, approval to add an insert sign to the main sign that reads `Antiques'. We would be happy to come to an upcoming PZC meeting to discuss this letter in detail,if necessary. Otherwise,please advise as to what our next steps should be. Best Regards, ffLu���, Robert A.Tobin C MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Bob Tobin,Manager,The Watson House Subject: Modifications to the Original Temporary and Conditional Permit for The Watson House Date: November 10, 1997 Since our meeting with you last month,we have decided to put down on paper all the ideas that we've had around potential business uses of The Watson House. Some of these are new ideas,some are ones we've discussed. I've organized them into one's that we'd like the commission to consider now,and those that we'd like to approach in the future. I though it prudent to get everything`out on the table' now, so that we can approach this properly,following a process that the commission approves. Thank you for considering the following: For Consideration Now: 1. Elimination of the 14 day time limit for overnight stays. We have found that flexibility in this area will provide a service in great demand by our corporate clients(i.e. accommodating longer term stays),while at the same time,not impacting the historic and residential character of the neighborhood. 2. Allowing weddings,parties and special events to be held at the inn. Approved parking would include the Inn's graveled lot and driveway areas and existing commuter parking along Main Street. We propose the maximum size for these events to not exceed 50 people. 3. Approval for permanently renting out the 3rd floor apartment. 4. Recognition that inn keepers will be hired to assist in the daily operations of the inn,and as part of their compensation,room andboard may be providea. 5. Recognition that we are interested in converting the existing T&C to permanent zoning when it expires. We understand that an amendment that would address this is pending. Guidance on the necessary next steps to be considered for this is requested. 6. Signage change approval as follows: replacement of existing sign with lamp post(with the sign attached to the post-already approved by historic society),mail box sign, `B&B' sign added to the existing`John Watson'Bicentennial plaque on the house and a special events sign(displayed occasionally)on Route 5 by the Chamber of Commerce sign on the corner of Sullivan Avenue and Route 5. For Consideration In The Future: 1. Use of the carriage house for special events(it would be renovated to serve as a patio/gazebo)and eventual modifications for inn keeper quarters-subject to Historic Society approval. 2. Approval for allowing the consignment of antiques by dealers at the inn for purchase by customers. In addition,approval to add an insert sign to the main sign that reads `Antiques'. We would be happy to come to an upcoming PZC meeting to discuss this letter in detail,if necessary. Otherwise,please advise as to what our next steps should be. Best Regards, Robert A. Tobin Town of South Windsor Proposed Subdivision Amendment January 16, 1998 Chapter 4, Section C.3.c. 2 is hereby repealed, and replaced P () aced with the ollowin Y P P .f g "(2)Industrial Cul-de-Sac Streets Cul-de-sac streets in all industrial zones shall generally not exceed 1500 feet in length, measured per Section C.3.c(1)above. The Commission may grant a waiver of the length requirement of this section, in industrial and commercial zones only, if the Commission deems it desirable due to adverse topographic or environmental conditions, difficult site configuration,if such street is likely to be extended in the future to another outlet, if no potential outlet would be available to serve the industrial zone area or if such extension serves the purposes of access mana eg_ment, subject to the following conditions:. (a) In no case shall a dead end street exceed 2,500 feet in length. (b) If a potential outlet is available, the Commission shall conclude that the conceptual routing of such outlet appears reasonable. (c) If no potential outlet is available, the Commission shall determine that the subject property cannot be reasonably served by any other public street(existing or future) due to site constraints(environmental or topographic), accepted engineering standards and/or prohibitive or excessive cost. (d) The Commission shall determine that the proposed extension conforms to the goals and objectives of access mana ern (e). The Commission shall conclude that the proposed street extension will function as an industrial local street,rather than a collector or arterial highway. Said waiver may be considered and acted upon at the request of the subdivider in advance of a formal subdivision application. In such cases, a conceptual layout of the proposed street extension shall be submitted with the written waiver request, accompanied by a narrative statement explaining the proposal and why a waiver is consistent with the requirements of this section. Any such waiver shall be conditional upon the requirement that individual lot development within the industrial subdivision shall, to the extent possible,provide for emergency vehicle access in the event of a street blockage(e.g. fallen tree ruptured pipe etc.). This may include an access driveway at each end of the street frontage providing an uninterrupted on-site vehicle by-pass to the blockage. Such driveways can and should be shared with abutting lots where feasible." Note: new language is underscored. PLEASE AND COMMENT - WRITE YOUR INPUT ON BACK LEAVE AT EWH POST OFFICE BOX 416 OR AT OUR HOME January 21, 1998 TO THE SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN ZONING COMMISION: After numerous conversations with neighbors who have approached me to write a letter to the Historical and Zoning committees representing the concerns of the residents of East Windsor Hill this is the result. Although we as neighbors are delighted to see the improvements of the Watson House and can appreciate the money,time, and effort it took to renovate we are deeply concerned with the creeping commercialization of the Watson House. We and our neighbors had hoped the new owners of the Watson House would confine their use of the old home to a bed and breakfast. This would continue the quiet, historic residential area of East Windsor Hill. We personally wrote 2 years ago opposing even the B &B use because we felt it would not end there. Our concerns are apparently coming to the surface. The owners are now approaching the town(according to an article in the Hartford Courant , January 16, 1998)to change the zoning to permit permanent boarding, catered events, public parties, off-site parking for these events and antique shops. A public hearing is scheduled for February 24 at 7:30pm in the South Windsor Town Hall. As neighbors we are concerned about the escalation of commercial activity at the Watson House. We do not want the historic home turned into a public boarding house. Its 12 large rooms could hold 24 people which would be a disaster to our area. The parking of 50 cars for catered events along Old Main Street and Sullivan Ave. would be a blockage and safety hazard at our end of the street. We personally have young children(9 and 11)who ride their bikes on Main Street and the considerable increase of parked and moving cars would be a tremendous hazard to them. As owners of adjacent and neighboring houses we do not want to look out our front windows to see parked cars up and down the street. We also have spent a lot of money keeping up our properties and have to adhere to strict codes set up by the Historic Committee. We all pay a large amount of taxes and we do this because we like Main Street and feel it is a privilege to live on one of the most Historically significant residential streets in Connecticut. We as many of South Windsor Residents enjoy walking and biking on Old Main Street, weaving around parked cars just doesn't add to the experience of quiet old world serenity. Page 2 The new owners have spent good money on the property but no promises were ever made to them that the Watson House could be used by them for more than a quiet Bed and Breakfast limited to 14 day stays. If the Tobins chose to move on after getting their zone change, will future landlords respect the unique historic and residential character of Old Main Street, or will they take advantage of it. We therefore oppose any further commercialization of the Watson House and its misuse by the present owners. No time extensions on length of stay, no parties, and no further street parking should be allowed by the Historic District Commission or the Zoning Boards of South Windsor in our opinion. As taxpayers we deserve protection of our historic homes from creeping commercialization. Who will want to purchase these large old homes with their high taxes and high maintenance costs with a catering business in their midst? The original 2 year variance for a B &B was supposed to help our area of town, not allow new owners to take advantage of a unique historic setting and then leave the neighbors with the headaches of noise, on-street parking and commercial business activity. This is an inappropriate use of a historic district. We cannot alter our homes ad lib in the Historic District and we have kept up our homes for years. Why should the new owners of the Watson House be allowed anything different. They have no hardship. Neither a poor investment nor lack of foresight is considered a hardship in legal zoning law. No one forced them to spend the money they have on the Watson House. And the Town should abstain from making promises to these people that they cannot keep, or which will devalue adjacent homes. The on-street parking of 50 cars on Sullivan Ave and Old Main Street for catered events and parties could pose a safety hazard. These roads were not planned for on-street parking. They are 2 lane roads. A safety problem could exist when these events end at night and people open car doors in the face of oncoming night traffic from Rte 5 and Main rounding the busy corner at Main& Sullivan Ave. in front of the post-office. Will the town be liable for an accident if they have approved on-street night parking at this busy 2 lane corner in front of the East Windsor Hill post-office? Why should the East Windsor Hill residents bear the annoyance and risk of this increased parking,traffic congestion, and noise. Would You want a boarding house, catered parties, antique dealers vans, 50 cars parked in front of your home if you lived in a historic district? We don't. Yours truly, &�- 644'1� Bru e&Debra B mham ko!�o U_A_X�� 1q'�R MT'�A Sf ea"O- cal C4,4VOL tie C S -0/0( . RECEIVED JAN 27 24.January 1998 Dear Town Planning and Zoning Commission Members: I was most disturbed to discover that the Watson House was under consideration for a permanent permit, with several changes requested that would certainly be most detrimental to East Windsor Hill. To even consider the alteration of the permit to allow more than a fourteen day stay is ludicrous,as the place would quickly become an undesirable apartment house,and the street a parking lot. On street parking and room rentals for more than fourteen days must be stopped at all costs. Before moving to South Windsor I owned a beautiful old Victorian house in the West End of Hartford. I watched as slowly the neighborhood became multi-family homes and rental properties devaluing the private homes and drawing transient,often times undesirable renters to the neighborhood. The number of cars using on street parking made the street look like a parking lot,and became almost impassable in the winter with the snow. Is this something we want to see in our town's Historic District?I think not. It would behoove South Windsor to deny this permit change. Main Street is one of the few places left in town that retains it's rural Colonial beauty. South Windsor should take heed of towns like Avon and Simsbury who have done an excellent job preserving the simplicity,beauty,and Old New England charm of their towns. We need more of this in South Windsor,not less. Therefore, I urge you to deny the new requests and maintain the present limits of 14 day length of stay,B&B use only,no catered events,and no on street parking, Thank You, i Robin Blowers-Piper 1906 Main Street South Windsor RECEIVED FEB 3 1QQR SOUTH MNDSOU PtANN1N9 DEPT. February 1, 1998 South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Commission Members: We are writing to you at this time to let you know we are opposed to the petition put forth by the owners of the Watson House to make changes to their existing permit. What was at first a quaint idea of using this historic location as a Bed and Breakfast takes a step in the wrong direction with apparent plans to allow the space to be used as an apartment house. Our feeling is that this is not an appropriate use of historic district space. We oppose this initiative with this letter, and will attend the hearing on February 24 to oppose the motion in person. Cordially, / Larry 1Jruckenbrod Susan Havens 1696 Main Street, South Windsor RECEIVED' " Craig N. Smith M.D. FEB 2 1996 1437 Main St. South Windsor, C7 06074-2455 SOUTH WINDSH PLANNING DEPT- D Go , `t C) en" (3— ISA- 0,A 1► 1 o ,� •� ., .\ � a � t � � �� 1 � � � ►� � �� � � ` �' � v ,�• : \ �► sir �, ,�� �� � V �� r � � � �. � � ,� 1 ` � i. � �i � ��� �.� �, � � � '- i ' � 1 � 1► \ � � � � � t� � � 'a � � "� \\ ` ,� \ �, '� \ � ', � ` \ �, � � a,,i�i � � �' �,. � � V 4� �� � ,� . �. r ,� � ��� � � �� Ir�' �� ' �� .. `\ � �. ,; � � �, � � ;. � � � ' � �� � � � � i� � �� .. . � � � �t! s'^�/ r EGE IV MITCHELL PIPER 1906 Main Street,Box 423 ■East Windsor Hill,CT 06028 ■ T -MANNING DEM February 2, 1998 To: South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission From: Mitchell Piper, 1906 Main Street Re: Modifications to the Original Temporary and Conditional Permit for the Watson House I live with my wife and two small children two doors from the Watson House and I am strongly opposed to any further expansion or development that is being proposed by Mr. Tobin at 1876 Main Street. I know that all of you are aware of the rich history that surrounds the homes in the East Windsor Hill area. Mr. Tobin is also aware of this history. In a recent article in Hartford Business Journal, January 26, 1998, he was quoted as saying, "The Watson House is drawing city folks.looking for a peaceful getaway_ . With the river just a half- mile away and sheep grazing across the street, the area is ideal..... History abounds here." He went on to say'I love this old house, The area is fantastic." Interestingly enough the changes proposed by Mr. Tobin will do everything possible to destroy this serenity and beauty. In a memorandum to the Planning and Zoning Commission dated February 8, 1998 he asks approval for renting the 3rd floor apartment and providing room and board for inn keepers yet states that parking for small events (40 People) will be provided by the Inn's driveway areas. Anyone can see that the Inn does not have enough parking for regular guests, renters, inn keepers and an additional 40 people. Having small children I am very concerned should cars be allowed to use the street for such events. We walk down Main Street almost every night and many of the houses in the area have children that ride bikes on the street. If the Zoning Commission allows these changes on a street and intersection that is obviously not wide enough to accommodate such changes then you must be prepared to be held liable should an accident cause injury to any of these children. As for Mr. Tobins proposal to allow boarders to rent the 3rd floor and have inn keepers live in the house I would ask the Commission; What would eventually stop the historic home from becoming a boarding or apartment house? With 12 large rooms this could be a disaster to the area. I would point out that the homes in the area are some of the highest taxed homes in South Windsor and that an event such as this will greatly lower our property values. 'I moved to.South Windsor from the West End of Hartford where my wife and I owned a beautiful old Victorian house. Within a few short years the neighborhood was destroyed as houses were renovated into two and three family rental properties. Do you think that this can't happen in South Windsor? Many of us that live on Main Street are deeply seeded in South Windsor. My wife was raised here and her parents still live here. We own homes, pay taxes, and support the local school systems and businesses. We are here for the long haul. Mr Tobin has stated on several occasions that he fixes up old houses as a hobby (as I understand it he is employed full time by Electronic Data Systems in Hartford). In fact from the same article quoted above he states, "Since moving to the Hartford area in 1985, he (Mr. Tobin) has renovated four homes." Mr. Tobin was fully aware of the financial limitations of the property when he purchased it. It is not the obligation of The Planning and Zoning Commission to provide for the financial viability of a business. Especially at the expense of the surrounding neighborhood!! Finally The Planning and Zoning Commission has a moral obligation to preserve the integrity of Main Street. It is truly one of the great areas in South Windsor and it deserves to remain so. Please do not allow financial gain by an individual or group of individuals to destroy what has survived for over two and a half Centuries. If you do you will never see it again. Sincerely Mitchell Piper cc. Town of South Windsor The Historical Commission John R. Collins S.Windsor Town Hall pal 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 South Windsor BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dear John: We appreciate the time you and the fire marshal spent with us on Friday 1/30/97 to discuss renewing our certificate of occupancy at the Watson House. Per your instructions,I am writing this letter to request a six month renewal. We understand that permanent occupancy on the 2"d and 3`d floors of the building require fire marshal-and building *inspection approvals. We•will work with you and the fire marshal over the upcoming-months io solidify ou:plans to finish the 2'd and 3`d floor,for-permanent occupancy. Again,thank you for your guidance and patience as we endeavor to complete renovations to our home. Sincerely, a Robert A.Tobin The Watson House Inn 1876 Main Street S.Windsor,CT 06074 e TIMOTHY R. WOOLDRIDGE 164 BALBRAE DRIVE BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 ($60) 561-7432 RECEIVED February 5, 1998 FEB 9 199$ Mr. Frank Castro SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Mr. Castro and Members of the Board: I am writing to you on behalf of the owners of the Watson House, Timothy Cameron and Robert Tobin. I am one of the former owners and restorers of the Simsbury 1820 House, an Historic Property located in Simsbury, Connecticut and now listed on the National Historic Register(please see enclosed article). In the conversion of the Simsbury 1820 House, my partners and I purchased a condemned building and we converted it into a splendid, elegant country inn. This property is located in the prime historic district of Simsbury and it had been abandoned for over twenty-five years. It is now, not only, a viable business, but also a show place for the town. I urge you to consider very carefully the requests from the owners of the Watson House, in order that they might experience the same success that we did. I have been a guest at the Watson House on numerous occasions and I have seen the great care and concern that Mr. Cameron and Mr. Tobin have taken in order to adhere to the historic and the architectural integrity of the house. It was with much thought that the owners undertook a project of this magnitude. They have done a wonderful job. Because of the architecture of the Watson House, it is my opinion that the best use of the third floor would be for one long term guest apartment. The floor plan lays out naturally for this use, and there are two means of egress readily available from this floor. This would produce a constant income for the business, and yet it would generate a minimum amount of noise and traffic. From my experience at Simsbury 1820 House, I know how important it is to be able to have people from the community and surrounding towns gather for festive and intimate occasions, such as showers, weddings, graduations and Christenings. I hope that you will grant the Watson House the ability to be involved in these important community functions. At Simsbury 1820 House, we were privileged to have many special occasions held on site. I believe that much of our success was do to the ambiance of our special property. This same ambiance is a very important draw to the Watson House. Page Two Having successfully been through this process myself, and seeing first hand how much time, effort and concern that both Tim Cameron and Bob Tobin have put into the Watson House renovation project, I hope that the Planning and Zoning Commission will respond favorably to their needs at the Town Meeting on February 24, 1998. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Timothy R. Wooldridge SDy1N SEA C � Wn 0s� �• ti F_ G ' s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 YpSOR Ca� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 February 9, 1998 Mr. Frank Castro Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission 120 Murielle Drive South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Castro: As I stated in a letter dated February 6, 1997, companies I've visited in South Windsor have stated they would support a hotel, motel or bed and breakfast facility rather than have to use out of town facilities. It is my understanding that the owners of The Watson House are going to appear before the Planning and Zoning Commission for amendments to their already agreed upon zoning agreement. If the Board can accept these changes to the present agreement, I think it would have a positive economic impact on the Town. Sincerely, Ral h F. Hedenberg Economic Development Coordinator RFH:dr a ELIZABETH SMITH HOWARD 1291 MAIN STREET SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 t V" J �A XAA- �QD 09 a� i ''►i . . � i + �i �r `' i � f 2 � f �� i �� � � I ♦ 1�r �.� k / 6 J Ili. � � i i � f � � � � /� � ,� s I 1 i � / � � � � � f '.+ �,- � � < � � � r _lam, � 1 � 9 . � � • � '" /� ` ,r s � :1e Li► � , -, � � , f f / / / — � / - ,- s � � � F E f w r i Mild f i � r F f f f E {[y€k F 4 k E k ' I�� S c�fl, i,J.�..., cC•,xr�. I-� ,�.o��,-s-� �.o,�L�-�' C�m�.:yufi.-, C1�. Vie., ►�n.e,�a-z, �t���X�.-•� �".�'�",.��, o-Lwti.�,�,;z. C �� �� ��a�� - z zzex ►ACruz- '��r c.��..��'-e._ 3 •Lc,�c --�'-e.ei-�. cCo-� r� c-wte.o_.,_v, c..��;z.. C�:z:�o-U.e�,,Q� r rte�, ct r - e- �v u�,., ��•'zt.v-� c:�n z c7z-i.�iJ-e�� ..,e„1-, r��-eL e e�_�etc 2. 1 ',t �- C"1'1 -P o"�-4-�- - (�•-�.c:�rZ�Gt� �,( G-wl- �z�-c ,t �-c�f ,�i e��-�ir• i I CL CL �� 0 �cr'��-►�,c, Cm n'l a-t•�-, ,jam . ►-to- �.✓��e.:. �cr�-�C'►�-�-x.-� -�-c� t�'--�..e�t.�e.,r:�; crw„�. •-�j--�.-e��n ���1 Yv`.Q�� .it. L--�—J��.���J .�Y�G'��} o'Yl�.X/Yt(j ✓C.—P�r-r-1�Cr'L.(L 2.Q� "•l -. c�-�e4 C�erv,e-t-�-�u�>�(�_ ��e-,�,�...c� �;c�..�_�����f� �-�� cs_�'_�_e•�.�e� .�-�.-Gc.,-v,.,--�.,h � �Z. ,=lit-�-�--�t�.�.n C�-� •-��1� c�--Z-s.�. (�'f->�-�. Ll cd �.1,/1/�-L� .��y�li--�✓'L, C..<''"►-y�.lrr1'-�!l,C..l-C�.L L-,�j�.,�t�J'y-1 cr71 .�--+.� RECEIVED FFe 10 rove soul# IrianPLANNING DEPE h� ll 41? R E C E I V E FEB 17 —cC L1r(c,al 1179 4 Sun Vie= . " D 121 'd&vle a4 y, vzc- - �74tocccC, Cleo ,vn 0--n O 2ivz c cry Q a 21 � 8 Fitch Hill Road, Hyde Park V r 05655 (802) 888-3834 1-800-639-2903 RECEIVED To: Planning and Zoning Commission FEB ti 1996 From: Vernon Petersen Subject: The Watson House SOUTH WINDSM PLANNING DEFT. Date: February 13, 1998 I am writing to express my feelings with regard to the request to make extensive changes in permitted uses of the B&B at the Watson House. While I am not an immediate neighbor I am very interested in the area as a member of the Historic District Commission. As the petition states, the purpose of the requested changes is to allow " business uses" for the Watson House . I feel all of them are totally inappropriate for the area, indeed for any residential area of South Windsor. I won't go into detail on each request . I'm sure others have done this. Please deny all requested.changes. Thank you. Yo s Trul , h 9 0 Main Street South Windsor, CT RECEIVED FEB 171* OM RAM WT. To the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission, 2/14/98 We are opposed to the changes in the Watson House permit. These changes exceed a resonable use of the property, in a residential area. The proposed use would diminish the quiet historic nature of the area, this would seem to remove the primary reason guests would want to visit this bed and breakfast. Thank you for your consideration, Dug as�A46rson Gail Anderson 960 Main Street South Windsor CT. RECEIVED February 14, 1998 FES 1 a fi996 South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission South Windsor Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, My name is Thomas G. Taylor and I live at 954 Main Street. I have lived at my current address for over 17 years. I am writing to object to any change in the current Temporary and Conditional Permit for the Watson House. I live near the Congregational Church on Main Street. On Sundays during the church service, Main Street is impassible for two way traffic, and a bottleneck for one way traffic especially when worshippers are opening their car doors. I am shocked that the Watson House would like to hold functions during week days or rent apartments. Holding functions and renting apartments at the Watson House will increase on-street parking. Despite the good intentions of the management at the Watson House, there are not enough people on their payroll to ensure that cars do not park on the street. There are already cars which belong to bus commuters parked on Main Street and Sullivan Avenue during the week. Adding more cars would make it very difficult for the bus or emergency vehicles like fire trucks to use either Main Street or Sullivan Avenue during week days. If you do not believe me, drive down Main Street in front of the church on Sunday morning and see how difficult it is to drive through the area. Changing the Temporary Permit for the Watson House will create a similar unsafe traffic condition at unpredictable yet busier times of the week. I am also opposed to a change in the permit given to the Watson House, because the Watson House is located in a residential zone. I agree with the town zoning ordinance that Main Street should remain a residential zone, and I believe that the vast majority of South Windsor residents want the street to retain its residential character. I hope that the Planning and Zoning Commission sides with the majority and is not swayed by the few who are willing to enrich themselves at the expense of many others. Sincerely, Thomas G. Taylor RECEIVED FEB 17 1998 MEMORANDUM SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Bob Tobin, The Watson House Subject: Revisions to our 11/10/97 `Modifications to the Original Temporary and Conditional(T&C) Permit for The Watson House'Request Date: 2/16/98 In preparation for the 2/24/98 Public Hearing,we spoke with several of our neighbors on Main Street to better understand their concerns with our 11/10/97 request for modifications to the T&C permit for the Watson House. It was clear that several items in our request were not acceptable to the community. In an effort to acknowledge their concerns and continue to be perceived as an asset to the community by our neighbors,we would like to make the following revisions to our request: Modifications needed to ensure the financial viability of the business: 1. Approval to rent out the 3rd floor apartment. We do not plan to ask for permanent zoning to convert the B&B to an apartment building or multi-family dwelling—renting of the 3rd floor will need to be renewed as part of the T&C permit. 2. Recognition that helpers may be hired to assist in the daily operation of the B&B,and that as part of their compensation,room and board may be provided. Note: As stated in the original T&C permit, the owners will continue to live at the B&B. Modifications that will aid our marketing efforts: 1. Allowing small charitable/special events,weddings,and business meetings to be held at the B&B. Approved parking will include the B&B's graveled and paved driveway areas only(not to exceed 15 cars). All access to the B&B for events will be via Sullivan Avenue,not Main Street. The maximum size for events will be 40 people. Events will be held indoors only and must not be a disturbance to the neighbors. No parking will be permitted on Main Street or Sullivan Avenue. Rased on innut from our neighbors. the remaining modifications in our 11/10/97 reauest are to be eliminated from consideration. We also commit to the commission to not ask for any further modifications during the remainder of our current T&C permit. Furthermore,prior to requesting a renewal of this permit in 1999,we will meet with our neighbors again to understand any issues they may have with our operation of the B&B and incorporate as many of their concerns into our renewal request as possible. We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to the hearing on the 24d'. B st Regards, Robert A. Tobin t t To: Carol and John Birden Debbie and Bruce Burnham Lorraine Jones Judy and Robert Peck Barbara and Robert Lavey From: Bob Tobin Subject:Revised Request for Modifications to The Watson House Temporary&Conditional(T&C)Permit Date: February 15, 1998 Attached is the revised letter I'll be delivering to the Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday,February 16, 1998. 1 appreciate the time you spent helping us better understand the concerns you had with our original request. During our conversations with you,it was apparent that the following background on what we've been through while opening and operating the business,helped clarify the reason's behind our requested changes: 1. The Watson House is the 5d'old home in the Hartford area that we've renovated,but we've never operated a B&B before. As a result,we are learning many things as we go. 2. Our original budget for renovations were under estimated-the renovations completed to date ended up being $20K over budget(largely attributed to overages for handicap access modifications,plumbing, electrical and exterior painting). Although we had budgeted for a fire protection sprinkler system,our budget was also under estimated for this item(by$10K to$32K). With the$20K overage for the completed renovations facing us,we were unable to afford the sprinkler system(necessary per fire protection regulations to open the 2nd and 3rd floors of the house to our B&B guests). 3. Because The Watson House is not breaking even,we must continue to work full-time jobs. Asa result,we need to hire helpers to assist with running the B&B. 4. Because we were unable to open the upper floors(due to the$28K to$50K sprinkler costs), alternative revenue sources are needed. Renting the 3rd floor out as an apartment will provide a steady stream of income. 5. We have made every effort to preserve the historic integrity of the house—it is always in the forefront of our minds. For example,the two shower stalls installed in the bathrooms,located in the old foyers on the 1"floor,were carefully placed in the old door frames,keeping in place all of the original woodwork. If someone wanted to restore the old foyers,they would find the original woodwork behind die wails we instaiied for the showers. in addition,we wiii be required to rebuild ilie back stairwells for fire protection egress and we plan to build over the existing steps,keeping them in place under the new steps. Thank you again. Please call if anything in the attached letter does not reflect your understanding of the changes I said I'd make. Sincerely, CIJ� Robert A.Tobin CC. South Windsor Planning and Zoning Board R a ANTHONY & VIRGINIA MACRO I 828 MAIN STREET EAST WINDSOR HILL CT o6028-005 I TELEPHONE 860 528 0838 February 17, 1998 RECEIVED Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor FE5 23 1998 South Windsor Town Hall South Windsor, CT 06074 SOUTH WIND PUNNI b€ft. Dear Sirs/Mesdames: We write to oppose any expansion of activity at the John Watson House located at the intersection of Main Street and Sullivan Avenue. It was less than a year-and-a- half ago the Messrs. Cameron and Tobin applied for a permit to operate a Bed and Breakfast in the Watson House. After allaying the fears of area residents by placing careful restrictions on the operation of the premise, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved their request. Now we learn that those restrictions may be removed: no limit on length of stay, turning a B & B into a potential boarding house; no restriction on receptions for weddings or business purposes, necessitating catering and accommodation of on-street parking. All of these activities were restricted, because they would destroy the very ambiance of the neighborhood which produces its unique charm. "Unique charm" sounds rather antiquated and irrelevant when we are talking about the dollars and cents issues of a commercial enterprise. But remember, it is precisely the "unique charm" of the Watson House and its setting that Messrs. Tobin and Cameron are trading on. Should we in South Windsor risk the deterioration of one of our most distinguished neighborhoods for the temporary gain of individuals? An article in the January 26th, 1998, Hartford Business journal states that "since moving to Connecticut in 1985, Mr. Tobin has renovated four homes." That does not reassure us that he and his partner are committed to the integrity of historic East Windsor Hill. As residents of Main Street, in close proximity to the Watson House, we often fear that our protests can be written off as self serving concern over the loss of an investment because of a reduction in property values. But that is unfair. We have chosen to live in past Windsor Hill because we love and respect its history. It is a privilege to live in and preserve the home of earlier South Windsor residents, despite high taxes and the higher than average maintenance costs. We consider ourselves more as custodians of our house than owners. We call on the South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission to serve as custodians of what is unquestionably one of the most significant streets in Connecticut, from a cultural, historical and architectural point of view. The Watson House is a premier example of the Adam/Palladian style, not only in South Windsor but in the entire Connecticut River Valley (the attached article is taken from The Great River, Art & Society of the Connecticut Valley, 1635 - 1820, published by the Wadsworth Atheneum in 1985). Preserve these treasures for us today and for the generations of tomorrow. Yours sincerely, Virginia Macro Anthony Macro r _ .f = - i 17.Frederic C.Detwiller,"Thomas Dawes's Church in Brattle 24 'Id-Time New England 69,nos.8-4(Winter-Spring 1979): !s,"Filhnore,"84. Thomas Hayden (1745-1817), architect and contractor •s,"Fillmore,"demonstrates Fillmore's reliance on Joseph John Watson House 'ptist meetinghouse(Providence, 1775)and Charles Bulfinch's East Windsor Hill, Connecticut, 1788-1789 et meetinghouse(Boston, 1788) for sources of inspiration. Photographs, 1984 February 1794 it was noted in The Minute Book of the iL)that the building committee was"directed to go on and meetinghouse"agreeable to the plan heretofore laid before The John Watson house is the earliest and most important The building accounts for the Middletown meetinghouse dwelling documented to the Windsor architect and builder Lt. i ost and there is no record of the workmen employed.Although Thomas Hayden (figs. 15-16).1 It is the earliest three-story j 'd moved to Vermont in 1796,his exact whereabouts during mansion standing in the Connecticut Valley today and was 'known.In East Haddam,the Society records refer specifically probably one of the first to be built. In the design of the n&Dimentions Captn Elijah Ackley has presented to this h regard to a Meeting House" (Kelly,Connecticut Meeting- Watson house Hayden firmly embraced the new Palladian 1 2). In Bennington,Fillmore appears to have been involved at style recently introduced to the Valley by William Sprats 3 ng of construction but probably left most of the work to Oliver (cat. 22). The Watson house was probably the most ambi- iddlebury,Martin L.Crandal was responsible for implement- •e's plans(Andres, "F.,lmore,"41-42). tious and largest domestic commission of his career. Here we s, "Fillmore,"42. find no hint of the vernacular undercurrents that anchored most eighteenth-century builder's experiments with Palladi- anism to the Valley tradition. Gone is the baroque aspect of verticality, the enormous gambrel roofs and nonsymmetrical 3 division of paneling in the formal rooms of'the interior. Crone also is the vernacular treatment of ornament that gave the mid-eighteenth-century mansions a regional distinctiveness. In scale and form this house resembles the great mansions of the coastal New England merchants. The Watson house is an early example of what would become the dominant high-style ` 4 building type for the Valleyelite of the 1785 to 1805 period (cat. 25). This style reflects a new and more academic phase of classicism strongly influenced by architectural books de- ;Y picting the elements of English Palladianism. The Watson house is enriched with Palladian-style orna ment executed on a monumental scale. Its frontispiece and lower Venetian-style window introduce the use of Ionic capi- tals and decoration found previously in the Valley only in the " work of William Sprats. Similarly decorated window caps, s s cornice lines and the piesciicc of four forma, entries (one on each side) give the house an alluring presence while intro- T during Palladian aspects of svininetry. The rear of the house is distinguished for its kitchen lean-tos and piazza.'This sym- metry is carried throughout the interior where the scale, plan, >-_ and decoration of rooms reinforce stylistic themes introduced { on the exterior. The house is noteworthy for its enormous I'I (13'2" w. x 39'3"d.) central halls which divide the rooms I� on all three floors. The function of the central hall as an inde- pendent formal environment is carried to new extremes in the f - Watson house where staircases are entirely enclosed behind walls and the function of the hall as a passageway to the upper rooms is significantly diminished. Although the northwest parlor (cat. 24.1) remains the most formal and lavishly deco- - — - rated room, the Watson house is noteworthy for the remark- - _ able extent of decoration in all twelve of its rooms. The panel- ing and decoration of the front rooms (each measures 17'9 x 16'7"d.) is arranged symmetrically with monumental Palla- Fig. 15 Thomas Hayden, architectural drawing, 1789. Ink on dian chimney breasts flanked by doors. The back rooms are paper.Private Collection. slightly shallower and exhibit a more traditional nonsym- metrical division of paneling. No two of the twelve rooms are identically decorated. The two most similar rooms are the , :t ,t a , . 4 . ° from business and devoted himself exclusively to "farming" (cat. 185).Watson was aself-conscious intellectual whose estate inventory listed a library of nearly 150 books on di- verse subjects, including literature, mathematics, geography, philosophy, and agricultural science.6 At the time of his death in 1824 Watson's estate was valued at nearly$60,000, x' l making him one of the wealthiest men in the Connecticut ' L&r Valley. His extensive investments in land and housing,bank, bridge, and turnpike stocks, and his experimental breeding farm with almost four hundred sheep show Watson to have l been among a new generation of modern men whose inde- pendent style and aggressive business practices mark a bold departure from the communal based orientation of the previ- ous generation. He carried this sense of style to the grave; he and his wife Anna are buried beneath the first monumental marble obelisks erected in East Windsor Hill. w N H t 1.Three of the thirteen architectural drawings by Thomas Hayden s}y r !: (private collection,photoduplicates in Connecticut Valley Archive, _ Wadsworth Atheneum)contain sketches of details for the John Watson '3 x f House.One of the two drawings here illustrated(fig. 15) is dated 1789 and identified with the name John Watson.The other(fig. 16) is also dated 1789 and coiaains details and descriptions of specific parts of the r ` house.Fig. 15 includes accurate to scale renderings with notations as t r , Y, follows: "Window Cornice John Watson house, 1789";"Window stool t ^R or Barr(?)J.Wn„;"The cornice to the Piazza John Watson";"The x " West cornice to the Piazza-the other one is out of proportion";"The 1�T base of the columns to Mr.Jn.Watson";"The cornice to Mr.John Wat- a--- son's piazza"; "The Base molding to Mr.John Watson's house."Fig. 16 is one side of a sheet that contains renderings on both sides.Although unidentified,this illustrates the frontispiece pediment of the Watson house and a ruler specifying the proportions for the Composite,Corinthi- an,Ionic,Doric,and Tuscan orders.The reverse of this sheet(not il- --- -- - lustrated)contains scaled renderings with notations as follows: "Cornice g, Fig. 16 Thomas Hayden, architectural drawing, 1789. Ink on for Shed window, 1789";illegible"cornice"plan;"The breadth of the paper.Private Collection. architrave for the above cornice"; "Cornice for the bedroom window"; "cornice for the end window in the Piazza"; "Cornice for the back room door."There is not a single elevation among the Hayden drawings. It is uncertain how these drawings were used. Indeed there is evidence that these drawings were made shortly after the house was built.Since they are drawn to scale and all but a few are of molding profiles it is pos- southwest front parlor and the northwest front chamber (cat. sible that they were used to gauge the profiles for molding planes. 24.2). The third floor rooms are also lavishly finished. 2.The importance of piazzas as architectural elements in eighteenth- In addition to the house,Watson called on Hayden to de- century Connecticut houses is rarely acknowledged.At least two Valley buildings,the Silas Deane house in Wethersfield,and the second house sign and build a detached carriage shed and privy.'These of Solomon Cowles in Farmington,had piazzas before the Watson house. buildings are in the same style as the house and are the ear- These elements are discussed in William L.Warren's Isaac Fitch of Leb- liest high-style examples of their forms standing in the Valley anon, Connecticut,Master joiner, 1734-1791 (Hartford:The Antiquarian &Landmarks Society,Inc.,of Connecticut, 1978). today. The importance of the Watson commission raises the S.A third drawing(not illustrated)clearly shows the spherical finial question, who was Thomas Hayden?As the patriarch of a that adorns the pyramidal roof of the privy. family of architects, as the probable master of Asher Benjamin 4.From the extant drawings,Hayden can be documented as building a (cat. 96), and as the recipient of important local commissions, house for Hezekiah Chaffee II of Windsor and remodelling houses for Thomas Hayden emerges as a major figure in the building Roswell Miller,Samuel Allyn,and Oliver Ellsworth of Windsor and for Y g g Oliver Phelps of Suffield.He may also have built the Jonathan Cowles profession of the Valley during important years of change.' house (1799) in Farmington which is similar in many respects to the His career bridges the gap between the professional wood- Watson house.Thomas Hayden and his brother Daniel(1742-1815) workers of the colonial era and the architects who emerged were the sons of Daniel Hayden of the Poquonock district in Windsor. Three of Thomas'sons(Horace,Chester,and Chauncey)became archi- during the era of the new republic.This raises questions about tects.Daniel was a carpenter in East Windsor(East Windsor tax assess- his training that cannot presently be answered.What is cer- ment, 1797,William Warren Collection,CHS) whose son Nathaniel tain is that Hayden's work represents a more scientific and Loomis Hayden and grandsons General William and Henry Loomis studied approach to "the art of building" than was practiced Hayden were all architects. 5.Stiles,History of Windsor,1:777 and 2:107.Between 1784(Connect- before in the river towns. icut Courant, 15 June) and 1802(Connecticut Courant, 1 November)Wat- Hayden's patron John Watson (1744-1824) was no less an son advertised his supplies of"European and India goods"including exponent of change.Watson was the quintessential late- "crockery,glass ware,hard ware,hollow ware and groceries." s.Estate inventory,John Watson, 1824,Hartford District,CSL. eighteenth-century country gentleman, a Yale graduate who 113 Michael & Sabine Giannamore RECEIVED 852 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 FEB 171995 (860) 528-9007 DEpT• South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission SDUTN WlNDSQR PLANNING Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Watson House, 1876 Main Street, corner of Main & Sullivan Avenue To Whom it May Concern: As residents of Main Street, we are writing to express our opposition to the proposed changes in the permit for the Bed & Breakfast located at 1876 Main Street . Please note the following: 1 - The existing permit has a 14 day length of stay limit . This is what is to be expected for a Bed & Breakfast . Anything more would appear to be only necessary for a long term apartment building. 2 - No on-street parking should be allowed for catered events . Main Street is a residential street and a tourist attraction (the only one in South Windsor) . 3 - As it now stands, a twelve room B&B will create too much traffic, thus there should be no addition of an antique business . 4 - Additional signs should not be allowed. We chose to purchase our home on Main Street for many reasons . We pay high taxes but have the joy of living in perhaps the most beautiful area of town. The proposed changes to the permit for the B&B at the Watson House jeopardize everything beneficial Main Street offers . Please consider the potential effects when deciding upon any permit changes . Thank you for your time . Sincerely, M' hael Sabine Giannamore RECEIVE [ r $1u emr?-� `cd j c g 9 8 FES 20 1998 iflr► tM I SS i O-L'1 G21/1 V� t��, CSZ.L.A� �C3 ft1 t/l � W1e'Q P ce UM i V��t Ce p �-; i ,cE— U-0W le, i✓e 'Cr i S1 hee v�(Q S -V►► C Q, ' �w- c---O vvi Cep aczDm ko i „ CQJ--4 4-1 cf L-A cll S o e-9z.p c� r9-c�`�—t�► ` Z cQ- �,'--,��,4ZQ Wt,u c lA O-c-c '�,eA 0 GO e-j4— CeL„ - - to c cam- In � �-F-, cam CkkA vi �Lee ck- 62� JL-U CLA � c� , iM VVN 1, �S C�vt m w\ e� Cs> �t CQ cQ j 1 ':�l LtA c-0-A ✓�roc, -�- RECEIVED' l C a�cQ i ��-Pe - AGO 20 1998 sooty winsiv p m ��� DEPr. RECEIVED FES 191998 S09M WINDSORPLAN ING DEPT. v' J \ \ ! 1"s s' q To { t+ 1 x W M+ h O t r • t 7 �d you> a o� G Vs vt U,!. 1\O t� O� O t.�X. �'l ��p"L� C t.J va�►c., 1 1 _ o h�.y 4 a o tr eat£ C e tom-,n-•SA G,C. l "vet i • � 45 t �Giw ��x 1 >r FRANK E. BROWN CE SIXTEENEAST WINDSOR HILLDCONN I V E D FEB 20 t999 SDR PLANURIG DEPT. 76 lie C7- -7- ✓��� �_ 'ci I✓'-ICI C.-1 v v- MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Bob Tobin,Manager,The Watson House Subject: Modifications to the Original Temporary and Conditional Permit for The Watson House Date: November 10, 1997 Since our meeting with you last month,we have decided to put down on paper all the ideas that we've had around potential business uses of The Watson House. Some of these are new ideas,some are ones we've discussed. I've organized them into one's that we'd like the commission to consider now,and those that we'd like to approach in the future. I though it prudent to get everything`out on the table' now, so that we can approach this properly,following a process that the commission approves. Thank you for considering the following: For Consideration Now: 1. Elimination of the 14 day time limit for overnight stays. We have found that flexibility in this area will provide a service in great demand by our corporate clients(i.e.accommodating longer term stays),while at the same time,not impacting the historic and residential character of the neighborhood. 2. Allowing weddings,parties and special events to be held at the inn. Approved parking would include the Inn's graveled lot and driveway areas and existing commuter parking along Main Street. We propose the maximum size for these events to not exceed 50 people. 3. Approval for permanently renting out the Yd floor apartment. 4. Recognition that inn keepers will be hired to assist in the daily of:rations of the inn,and as part of their compensation, room and board may be providea. 5. Recognition that we are interested in converting the existing T&C to permanent zoning when it expires. We understand that an amendment that would address this is pending. Guidance on the necessary next steps to be considered for this is requested. 6. Signage change approval as follows: replacement of existing sign with lamp post(with the sign attached to the post-already approved by historic society),mail box sign, `B&B' sign added to the existing`John Watson'Bicentennial plaque on the house and a special events sign(displayed occasionally)on Route 5 by the Chamber of Commerce sign on the corner of Sullivan Avenue and Route 5. For Consideration In The Future: 1. Use of the carriage house for special events(it would be renovated to serve as a patio/gazebo)and eventual modifications for inn keeper quarters-subject to Historic Society approval. 2. Approval for allowing the consignment of antiques by dealers at the inn for purchase by customers. In addition, approval to add an insert sign to the main sign that reads `Antiques'. We would be happy to come to an upcoming PZC meeting to discuss this letter in detail, if necessary. Otherwise,please advise as to what our next steps should be. Best Regards, Robert A.Tobin South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission , Town Hall IVE 1540 Sullivan Ave ��� 9 South Windsor, CT 06074 1"s new owners of the Watson House (corner of Main and Sullivan Ave) are applying for 6K,j gDjfjpges in their permit: �se of the Watson House as an apartment house (12 rooms) with no limit to length of The existing permit is limited to 14 day length of stay. on-street parking for 50 people at catered events, parties and weddings (along Sullivan �l and Old Main Street). No off-premises parking is now allowed by their permit. conversion of carriage house to apartment use for the owners so they can rent out thei%L' )le house, which has 12 rooms! conversion of their temporary 2 year permit for a Bed & Breakfast to a permanent mit with no limit on length of stay. The present limit is 14 days B&B use only, no :red events, no on-street parking. J7" ,L2.,L� antique business on the property C`v additional signs. ce they get the permanent permit will they sell and leave us with a c mmercial xtment house, and a catering business for weddings, parties and special events, and an ique business smack in the middle of our residential historic district and private homes. sere will the parking go for the 30 people living on the property, the 50 people ending the catered parties, and the 5 to 10 employees needed for these events? That is \�, se to 90 cars along Main Street and Sullivan Ave! ;ase mail your letter before the Feb. 24 Public Hearing at 7:30pm at the South Windsor wn Hall. Otherwise the 2 year Permit for a limited stay (2 week) Bed & Breakfast a1d be converted to a Permanent Permit with unlimited stay which in effect would be a room Apartment House. They also want a catering business, more employees, an dque business, and on-street parking for at least 50 cars and more signs.. The TPZ pears to be encouraging this application. RECEIVED NO 19 TO: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning =A WINDSQR PIANNINN Offil FROM: John R. Collins, Chief Building OfficialJV- William R. Lanning,Fire Marshal ' / RE: The Watson House, 1876 Main Street We met with Bob Tobin at 1876 Main Street on January 30, 1998,to discuss concerns we had with exiting from the second and third floor areas. There is some work to the rear stair that would have to be done prior to an approval for the use of these areas for apartments. He is aware of the requirements, and has stated that he will work to comply with Code requirements. We looked at the area to be used for weddings and parties. We found no problems with the use of these areas,provided the number of guest stayed at approximately forty people. The time of stay at the Bed and Breakfast does not impact the approved use as an Rl occupancy RECEIVEly, FEB 20IM P.O.Box 36 East Windsor Hill, CT SQNTN WINM PLANNING KPT. Dear Planning and Zoning Commission Members: As immediate neighbors of The Watson House, we are concerned about the application which seeks to expand the use of the property beyond the T&C permit . When the two year temporary permit was given, the conditions were quite clearly for a bed and breakfast only. No one was to stay longer than 14 consecutive days. Holding other functions was not an approved use. We felt that we would be able to live with this and would withhold further comment until the two year time period was up. According to the most recently amended request from Mr. Tobin, the property would now become one floor bed and breakfast, one floor a rental apartment, and one floor for the residence of the owners and friends and possibly an inn keeper. Only one third of the property would be a bed and breakfast and the remainder would be available to become an apartment house or full time residences. This temporary situation could last for a very long time. Using the property for additional commercial operations, catering and apartments, sets a dangerous precedent for commercial encroachment of the historical district and the neighborhood. During this special permit period for a bed and breakfast at least two functions have been held which created parking and traffic problems on Sullivan Avenue and Main Street. Sullivan Avenue has no street lights and it is difficult to see the parked cars on the street beside The Watson House. The street is also more difficult to travel because it is much narrower due to parked cars. Yes, when fifteen or twenty cars leave this area at approximately the same time, the closing of car doors is heard in our house. The fact that the use of this property for catered events has already been advertised in the newspaper and a brochure seems presumptuous when permission has not been secured from the town. Our concern is with the possibility that in reality the expansion of the special permit use creates further commercialization of this property which may on effect result in spot zoning. We oppose the requested expansion of the business beyond a bed and breakfast. Sincerely, Robert and Judith Peck Walter J. FitzPatrick Ellen M. FitzPatrick 1846 Main Street So. Windsor, CT 06074 RECEIVEO February 20, 1998 FEB 23199E South Windsor Town Planning&Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Ave./Town Hall SOM WINDW So. Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sirs: We are new owners of the original John Clapp House in the historic area of Main Street, South Windsor. We are proud to be part of one of the best preserved historic areas in the United States. We realize that as residents of this area we are, most importantly, custodians of history. We invested in this area and became residents because we believed that our interests and those of the Town of South Windsor Administration were both to maintain the historical character of the district and the individual properties. We are concerned that granting a permit to the Watson House to engage in various commercial activities will endanger the commitments of the town and the area residents to preserve and protect the historical character of this area. Specifically,we do not want off-site parking( on Main Street& Sullivan Avenue)permitted. Currently,parking for users of the commuter bus to Hartford is permitted. This regularly accounts for one vehicle for each of the approximate dozen commuters that utilize this transportation means. Using the North end of Main Street as a parking facility currently destroys the pastoral nature of the area. This area now becomes just another parking area with trucks and cars predominating the vista during daylight hours. To increase the current situation by up to 90 cars for the Bed &Breakfast permanent residents, employees and people attending functions would be a blatant disregard of our historic area. We request that the other permit changes be denied. These include: Q Use of the Watson House as apartments with no limit on the length of stay. • Conversion of the carriage house to an owner's or property manager's apartment. • Use of the Bed &Breakfast for catered events and parties. • Operating an antique business on the property. The above activities change the usage of the Watson House into purely commercial enterprises. Accepting such changes, signals that our historic area is open to further development by all kinds of businesses. As residents and neighbors we consider such uses inappropriate for a rural historic district. We do not want the requested zoning permit changes granted. i r We realize that the new owners of the Watson House,The Tobins and their business partner Mr. Cameron, have invested significant money in the property and have further increased their investment with subsequent renovations. They surely wish to obtain a healthy return on their investment by establishing additional income opportunities for this property. Unfortunately, these plans are not consistent with the use conditions known at the time they acquired the Watson House. A zoning change may be granted with the personal assurances from the current owners that the unique historical character of the neighborhood will be preserved. However,what assurances do we, as residents, have that future owners will not take advantage of the situation of having a business in a very pristine historic area? We believe that the best interests of this historic area, its residents, and the Town of South Windsor are best served if the Town Planning&Zoning Commission denies the zoning changes to the Watson House. Very Truly Yours, WaAJ. Fitztrick Ellen M. FitzPatrick cc: South Windsor Historic District Commission RECEIVED FEB 231"5 309111 WINDSOR ?M1110 DEAF. February 20 , 1998 TO: The South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Patrick & Lynda Jones 1.21.6 Main Street , South Windsor V" RR: Watson House Permit Please accept this letter as evidence of our strong opposition to the proposed changes in the permit for the Watson House that is being considered at the February 24th Public Hearing. We believe these changes would have a serious negative impact on our neighborhood. Thank you for recording our opposition. t RECEIVED FEB x4 10 1225 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 February 21 , 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Commission Members , We are opposed to all "Considerations" Robert Tobin is asking of the Planning and Zoning Commission, through a letter written by him dated November 10 , 1997 . In our mind Bed and Breakfast is exactly as stated: spend the night ; have breakfast served by the host/hostess that lives at tie residence; and go about your travels . Would anyone, anywhere in South Windsor, want their next door neighbor (in a residential zone) catering parties, weddings , and special events? And how about the extended noise, traffic, and general nuisance of motor vehicles and large grougs of people year .round? Zoning Board members ; there is a big difference between B & B and all the extras that Robert Tobin is requesting! Do not grant these exceptions ! Shame on Mr. Tobin. He is stated as saying (Htfd. Business Journal , 01/26/98) , "I love this old house . The area is fantastic . " If he feels this way he wouldn' t convert the carriage house to apartments ; rent the 3rd floor; and park cars up and down Main St . , So,, Windsor ! Sincere US wo lsie and Richard Woolam 35 Ferry Lane South Windsor, CT 06074 February 22, 1998 rtd '24 199A South Windsor Town Planning and Zoning Commission South Winds0t INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY Town Hall CONSERVATION COMMIDDION 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 I am writing to express my husband's and my objections to the proposed changes with respect to the use of the Watson House on Old Main Street. We have lived in our home since 1989 and have worked very hard on the house. We knew that our house was located in a historic district and believed that that fact would preserve the beauty and charm of the area, and therefore both the value of our home and our desire to continue to live there. For years we watched the Watson House with interest hoping that someone would purchase it with a desire to improve upon and preserve it, as we feel we have done with our home, Our area is very peaceful. The only real traffic on our street consists of bicycles, farm machinery and sightseers, although we have been concerned in the past with the speed at which many sightseers navigate Ferry Lane on their way to view the Connecticut River. We believe that if the Watson House were to be converted into a commercial venture it would drastically alter the character of this beautiful area. The Watson House is not located on a typical"Main Street"in a typical town where many business are located. Unlike many towns that have seen excessive development on their original main thoroughfare, we are extremely fortunate that so much of the historical character of our main street has been preserved. We are also very concerned about the increased traffic--we enjoy riding bicycles with our two young children and know that this would be more dangerous if the Watson House became a more commercialized business. On street parking for 50 people at catered events would certainly increase traffic on our street as-well as Main Street. In addition, if this home were permitted to become such a commercialized establishment,what would prevent the escalation of this process to the other large homes in this area, which would forever alter the-character-of this unique area? We are certain that the parties that would be thrown at the Watson House would be extremely disruptive for what is, and should remain, a quiet, residential area. The creation of a twelve room apartment house would also cause disruption to the peaceful nature of our neighborhood with the increased traffic that would necessarily be the result. There is certainly no precedent in this area for such an establishment. The people who purchased the Watson House were fully aware of the zoning limitations of their property when they bought it. We appreciate the fact that they have spent money renovating their home, but we believe (based on information published in various publications)that we have actually spent a similar amount on the purchase and renovation of our home and_yet we have not sought to recoup our expenses by renting out rooms or our yard for parties. It is extremely unfair to begin to change the character of one of the most beautiful areas of Connecticut merely because these people may have overextended themselves. How can the town of South Windsor permit the desires and perhaps foolish judgment of these people to outweigh the preservation of this area? Will the town allow these people to risk ruining the beauty of what has existed essentially for hundreds of years? Anyone who has walked through this area has read the sign placed at the mouth of Ferry Lane which quotes John Adams as saying"Today I walked through Paradise". If this zoning change is allowed to go forward, we believe that this area will become Paradise lost. Sincerely, D G ( `'Ql�x�' rttt 2� lyyat Jean and Robert Cohn South windsw INLAND WETLANDS AGIEM!/ CONSERVATION OO#4MrSM t `OW N SE4 co O a S 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR CO�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 'R E C E IV EU HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION l FfB 24 9M February 23, 1998 SOUTH WINDSOR PI,ANiIIIMG KM Planning and Zoning Commission South Windsor, CT ATTN: Chairman Frank Castro Dear Chairman Castro: The South Windsor Historic District Commission recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission take into consideration the historical and residential character of the area when reviewing Application #97-99p for the Watson House, 1876 Main Street. Thank you for your time and deliberation regarding the above matter. Sincerely, Caroline Alexander Chairman RECEII� FES 26 1998 Dr. &Mrs. Steven Goldblatt 1139 Main Street South Windsor, Conn. 06074 S081 WiNow Plums DEPT. February 23, 1998 Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning To whom it may concern, We am writing to express our strong opposition to the plans for further expansion and development of the Watson House and the attached property. We had chosen to live on Main Street probably for many of the same reasons that attracted the present proprietors if the Watson House. There is a sense of peace, privacy and solitude in this neighborhood. It attracts many people who enjoy a walk along "Old Main Street"or cycle its gently rolling terrain. We would envision that if approval were given to significantly expand the above property, the increase in traffic and congestion on the street would indeed be disruptive. We would not want to see a precedent set for commercial expansion on what is considered to be a residential area. As members of the South Windsor Historic Society, we would see this as going contrary to the preservation of the historic district. cerely yours, P icia Gol Dr. Ste Gold 1 tt � % Stafford J. King III 605 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Tel: 860 282-2668 e-mail staffkinp,@earthlink.net February 23, 1998 TO THE SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN ZONING COMMISSION: I wish to register my disapproval with reference to the application for commercial expansion to the Watson House, located on Main Street and Sullivan Avenue in East Windsor Hill. It is my feeling that this expansion would impose a negative impact on the neighborhood, create unnecessary traffic and parking problems and distract from the historic ambiance of the district. I do,however, applaud the efforts that have contributed to the recent improvements and hope that the Watson House will continue operations within its present permit. Respectfully, A+oL Stafford King 24 1� a cs, —F—L 'kjTk—vj 6 UA- ICyT .,I i; �r ! F ! ti+ f t'! V t ! :Ij v :1 l � J Noly yF it rid tt!: i•44 i{- Fif F+i �i t,4 i' sL i • ii 3i! r; f 11� 1; 4' i • � � � � � �� ��� � a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � { � N\ 1 To: Planning and Zoning Commission and Historic District Commissi Mpp- From: Edward and Linda Sunderland 12 Strong Rd. So. Windsor FEB 24 199A Re: Watson House commercial expansion - Please - NO! South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ Right in the middle of our own historic district, sits one of the MMNSERvaTION COMMSSioN outstanding architectural gems of the 18th century. This rare 3 story Connecticut River Valley Home was designed by the same architect responsible for designing the home of Oliver Ellsworth, one of the first chief justices of the United States. This house is one of the greatest treasures and pleasures of Main St., and in spite of it's sale to new owners last year, it should always remain our task to protect its historical integrity: for Mr. Watson, the original builder who built the grandest 3 story house in the entire Connecticut River Valley in 1789; for previous owner Hildred Raymond, whose Main St. lineage dated back to the 1600's, caretaker for 30 years of this great house, she loved it and shared it with admirers; for the schoolchildren who take in the history of East Windsor Hill every Spring, and for the infinite number who flock to the "Hill" every week to walk, to bike, to jog, or to just soak in the special ambiance created by its architecture. A bed and breakfast was a fitting and understandable use for the Watson House, it preserved the structure and it's incredible architectural details while still opening it to admirers and travelers. To expand this original intention is to abuse the trust of the public that initially voted for it, and to insult the integrity of the historic district that surrounds it. There is only one word to describe what becomes of old houses turned into apartments or boarding houses - UGLY. Almost invariably they are not owner occupied, ( I understand the present owners intend to move out of the main house and live in the carriage shed - then if they need more room or money, rent that?) they become run down, cars are everywhere, their ownership changes endlessly, (if this new effort doesn't work, it makes sense that a sale will probably follow.) We cannot take this chance, we must do our best to preserve this area, and continue to demand only good intentions from whoever comes along and wants to partake for their short while in our special place. We must preserve the architecture of that special place for the future. To paraphrase that wonderful quote - "We do not inherit these architectural treasures from our parents, we borrow them from our children." FEB 24 1998 South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ Please, let us not invite boarding houses and traffic to Main Stt... VATi°" c ,''""' 1O" Route 5 is just about 100 feet away, close enough!, yet we're still able to pretend it's 100 miles away when taking in the serenity of fields of sheep and hay barns before us, and Watson's grand old house standing sentry behind us. There is a sign stating that 200 years ago, on traveling through this beautiful place, President John Adams wrote in his journal, "I passed through Paradise today." We should feel proud to have maintained John Adams' Paradise, and accept the challenge to continue. Just as the residents of the 1930's are remembered for keeping Route 5 from running through and ruining their Main St., may the members of the Planning and Zoning and Historic District Commissions be remembered for their wisdom in the challenges of maintaining "Paradise". Respe fully, Edward and Linda Sunderland cc:Planning and Zoning Commission Historic District Commission TO: South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission RE: "Watson House Request" - R. Tobin DATE: February 24, 1998 - Hearing I wish to address the above applicant's need for modifications to his present zoning permit that will ensure the financial viability of his business. It is not the mandate of a zoning board to ensure the financial success of any businesses in town. Had the applicant intended to generate a full-time financially viable "Inn business" in South Windsor, he should have sought a location in a business or commercial zone. In our residential zones we allow, with conditions, home occupations (Sec. 4.8), but specifically not the"dispensing" of food. The temporary permit granted to the "Watson House" owner was for a "use not specifically mentioned elsewhere in our zoning regulations," namely a BED and BREAKFAST. This is a home occupation within a residence. The conditions stipulated for the existing temporary permit were agreed to by the applicant. The requested modifications to allow an apartment and boarding rooms in the temporary permit may be unnecessary because in an A-40 zone a homeowner is permitted three boarders or roomers (Sec. 4.3.3). This applicant could accommodate his hired help and his "friend-in-need" (the third floor renter) under the present permitted uses in an A- 40 Zone. In this manner he would also save himself the expense of further structural modifications. Charitable and business meetings, weddings and catered affairs, are all functions of an "Inn" or banquet facility, not a bed and breakfast. These activities were specifically denied this applicant before issuing the temporary permit for a bed and breakfast and, I believe, before he purchased the property. Allowing these uses introduces the dispensing of food, which is specifically denied in A-40 and the traffic problems for which the given area was not designed. Agriculture is a permitted use in an A-40 zone. Because of this, 18-wheel tractor trailers carry corn out of the meadow via Ferry Lane and Sullivan Avenue to Route 5 in the Autumn; tractors and harrows maneuver this East Windsor Hill corner in the Spring; tobacco riggons and tandem hay wagons come and go during the Summer amidst the normal traffic which turns around in the street to do business at the post office. The Connecticut Company bus sometimes parks on Sullivan Avenue and the cars of commuters line Main Street much to the consternation of home owners. The last thing this corner needs is more traffic. Nor would the residential character of the Watson House, or the neighborhood, be enhanced by graveling its entire backyard to provide parking of vehicles. Please do not allow this temporary Bed and Breakfast to be a stepping stone for an expanded commercial use of this residential property nor allow it to effect unnecessary, unwanted, and unwarranted spot zoning at the threshold of South Windsor's Historic District. c Doris P. Burgdorf ; 1245 Main Street and 315 Ferry Lane The Watson House "Today ,.I rode through paradise. John Adams,when passing through South Windsor in 1771 AMM 1788Elli Y The ink on the bard-won Constitution was barely dry. A brand-new nation struggled for sovereignty flash from a Y w h /jet 2•. . victory against the most powerful nation in the world. And g , •sue• �� <::::; ��'�'� ;•�,.{. �f..: in theverdant green of the Connecticut River Valley, a spacious the mansion arose. " Designed and built by Lt. i:;.;.:,.,<.>.' Thomas Hayden, the mansion showcased the new Palladian style, with its clean hhes and four near# identical faces. : _ > IN The three-story, 6,800 square feet home, the most ambitious k ; : ,:•,, :. ;:<> Lyv ' .' ,•r ••� . domestic commission of Hayden's career, was among the arst ' such mansions to be built in the district, and is the only .'iK.. •'•k:tiv Lb:ihd M4 is remaining one of•tI s kind still standing in the Connecticut river valley. T::z .ba:\�::,Y�• .. •y'-'•.-h'�7F'A'�yAC..vFnF•:8.AvS3ki Circa 1788 Today ' Guest accommodations Located in the historic East Windsor Hill district,on With breakfast '01d'Main Street, The Watson House is less than a mile from the banks of the Connecticut River. (,.Catered events r Spacious, authentic y Virtually unchanged since its construction, The Watson House today boasts of many anhitectural features that appointed wall takeyou back to when men would raise a tankard of ale to the new republic. v w x A Connecticut River bier �� 0 1876 Main Street, East Windsor Hill Discover for yQUrselfl d South Windsor,CI'06074(860)282-8888 � � �io awxc, Reservations: Wle suggest you call ahead for < < lodging. Please call(860)282-8888. : « Facilities Rates: Standard rates range firm$95 to$125 s r For overmightguest per night Substantial reductions (u to 50%)^ , p Y for extended stays. The Watson House offers discriminating travelers a y quiet unique spot to relax and refresh themselves. It has Credit Cards: VISA Master Card American :{LC:::{:t�S::{i:•': ':+.'R{:.:_ jJ:��f�n:: +Y'':Y;.•:%?}:i.i:�:SSS �A .:...v.......:is <If I; , Ins• ; >� #}^ fi:;:::_: Y:::: ::::k three guest rooms, including one taro-room suite, lovingly Express. ' n restored and furnished, each with its own private bath and working fireplace. . In its location less than a half Directions: From Interstate 91, take Exit 35, hourfmm Hartford and Sprzngfeld, and just 15 minutes Interstate 291, Bissell Bridge. Go over the CT Many original elements of from Bradley International Airport, business travelers 'River. Take next exit.-Route 5,North. The Watson House remain: can find a distinctive base from which to access cients, and then to relax after hours in pleasant charm. Start Scenic Route: After turning onto Route 5 each day at the Watson House with a delicious breakfast. North,take the next left(Chapel Road)after the * Sandstone steps stand beside the road,to Stroll our exquisitely landscaped'grounds, or meander highway underpass. At the end, turn right on serve long skirted ladies attempting to enter through town. Main Street. "After about 3.5 miles, the Inn is waiting carria ges on the right, number 1876, at the corner of Sullivan and Main. Park in the rear. Each guest room has a fireplace Foryour special events: Fastest Route: Continue on Route 5 North, * The floorplan conceived by Hayden remains until the tralc light at Route 194 intersection intact The Watson House offers a charming backdrop to any (Sullivan Ave). Turn left. The Inn is the second event,from a wedding or fundraising dinner,to a business house on the left,parking is in the rear. * Two rooms are"covered in what many experts retreat. We can arrange many different catered meal and bekeve is,the original wallpaper event configurations,as desired. Cancellation Policy: Deposit in ,the amount of one night's lodging required within seven days of * A now blocked tunnel,discovered'in the the 'date reservation is made. Deposit not basement, lends credence to the legend that refundable unless cancellation for any portion of The Watson House was a stop on the the stay received seven days prior to arrival date. Underground Railroad, with its owners . helping slaves escape to Canada. The tunnels originally built by John Watson to haulgoods Coale enjoy the best of transported up the Connecticut and Scantic traditional New'England at The from the River banks to The Watson House cellarforstorage,allowed unobserved access Watson House. And if you to the house listen very closely, you may well The Watson House * Built oneyear before George Washington hear the whispers and echoes of er Inn A Connecticut Rio became president,the property is listed on an earlier time. the National Register of Historic Places as 1876 Main Street,East Windsor Hill part o the East Windsor Hill Historic District South Windsor,CT 06074 f (860)282-8888 /ems/,� Bed-.And B '_ re ast O "PM New PlanT I By MARK SPENCER O�ght Courant Correspondent velop it into a r inn apartment, which the original. events—a plan that since been Honora Futtner said. `It sosrt eof wore owners occupa the ncy was stipulated dropped. SOUTH Wnts were —Many Main makes you wonder what they'll ready rented. He said he had ter Cameron declined to comment at- Street h residents were pleased when d the hearing on whether the bust- was renovated and opened last year Cameron acknowledged that the business h agreedo a agreement allowed the ness could succeed without town ap- as the town's only bed-and-break. - , catered provat of his proposal fast. But the neighborhood has appar. turned on the owners,Robert entlYTobin 7CUrSTobin and Tim Cameron, saying FUTON' SUpE they fear future plans for the bust- ness may not flt their residential neighborhood. PLUS The business opened with tempo- r ary, special permission from the FU planning and zoning commission to Come See A Better j operate in a residential area.Neigh- S o"f a S I����I' hors were galvanized into action re. SAVINGS LIKE Gently when the owners sought PreAflum Black Metal Frame SPECIAL PURCHASE. town permission to host special events—such as weddings—not to Solid Blreh 4exceed 40 People.Cameron withdrew that request InciR? 399 at a public hearing Tuesday, but SOgd Pines ' Includes Futon continued to ask permission to rent a third-floor apartment in the house 0 A Frame • L Frame., and use two other rooms for em- Studio Loveseats. : SPECIAL PURCHASE ployees who would receive board in- Sofas ? In- stead of wages. s 139 " 3491 1; ,.Solid Ash - About 40 neighbors attended the I $ hang, and the commission re. Includes Futon Includes ceived about 25 letters opposing the Futon li Proposal The co -.mmission was not •' ••- , expected to vote on the topic Tues. 1 • • t day.The panel has 60 days to reach •• • lei a decision. 1000's of covers from $29.00 Including LICO ``uthO� �Y said they were g NN Cover& Pillows Pleased with the renovation of the x neglected house, they were con- . M)66MIDN . l _ cerned a rental unit could open the 1079 Queen St.,Rivertlend Plana 3091 Bedin Tpke.,Lechmere Pian W)641WO4 ���236-0152 door to changing the single fatnii Southington. Newington 348A West Middle Tpke. 2533 Albany Ave."Bishops Comer neighborhood. Y. Manch.Parkade,Manch. West Hartford 4 And with only three.guest rooms - -• now available, they question if it was an economically viable.busi- ---— — --- ness or if the owners wanted to de ■ ' �3 Ifew aiser � r nnmfie7d Sen ,�.• nr C!entPr �� . owN seq F 7omn o-ies-oitdA ?d- �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 f�4Soe•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 March 25, 1998 Certified Mail Robert A. Tobin The Watson House Inn 1876 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Tobin: Re: Appl #97-99P- Modification to Original T & C Permit We regret to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on March 24, 1998 to deny the above-referenced application. The Commission had the following concerns: • Noncompliance with approval conditions • Neighborhood opposition • Proposed B & B amendment was defeated by the Planning & Zoning Commission January, 1996. • Precedent would be detrimental to Main Street and the historic district. If you have any questions feel free to contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION . 6— Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer D ' June 17, 1998 Town of South Windsor 1550 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Attn:Planning&Zoning Commission To Whom it May Concern: On Saturday,June 20'h,an engagement party for friends will take place in our home. As there may be a large number of people attending,I want to make it clear that this is not a business function of the Watson House. I hope this answers any questions or concerns that may arise. Sinc41y, Tim e � m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE •SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 ��yOsoR-c0 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644.3781 January 22, 1999 Mr. Robert A. Tobin 1876 Main Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Tobin: Re : Appl ##97-99P, The Watson House Inn This is a reminder that the Temporary & Conditional Permit to allow a Bed and Breakfast facility on property located at 1876 Main Street, A40 zone, will expire on February 18, 1999. If this use is to be continued, please make application .to the Planning & Zoning Commission. If you have any questions call the Planning Department at 644- 2511, ext. 253 . Very truly yours, PLA-N�NING & ZONING COMMISSION Deborah L. Wark Recording Secretary t , I Birden Property P w N Birden Right of Way 176' Robert A. Tobin 1 East Lane Apt. I , r rf t Bloomfield, CT 06002 (860) 286-9084 Y� Pro ert 1876 Main Street p ' Date of Drawing.: January 27, 1997 Scale...................: 1 inch = 10 feet 224' Acerage of Lot...: .92 Size of Lot..........: 176' x 246' � "�,t@pyy�em:anmdwww—o.sawwvnmvwnaauansnnnwruwwma� prwwv.wecon.nrw:wr.wmews:esaw,.nrmrwm: r N' Carriage House s _ — Garage , Y _ (2 Cars) r (2 Cars) 42' [Pri 'r 15 L U s � Q The U 52 Watson 22 M House U i (6 x Ip\� r, r .t �'! :et««w pryxw a�4hmwwuw:1,�w„wgw,.s4'�:wPa:uewww�:,�m�a My�„aeawi ,v�«wla�wed;,'�wM w,aMeµ*�ti�a�.o�4ws+*.�'u+� w :+te«w�wore e«aww ,»raf w<u .,, •.' ,;uS;,W* ,•..•. w�l: ,.F+ w ., '.,... � w, Birden Property N Birden Right of Way Y 17s' J Robert A. TobinIMI C7 Z 1 East �J Lane / Apt. I Bloomfield, CT 06002 (860) 286-9084 Property...............: 1876 Main Street < <` Date of Drawing.: January 27, 1997 Scale...................: 1 inch = 10 feet P Acerage of Lot...: .92 r Size of Lot..........: 176' x 246' ° e \If/ C = arriage House r (2 Cars) Garage t �, � Prlil �, \\<z f 2 Cars 1 I I/ ( ) � Y 8. 42' /III'\�\ o r a 32' Light 2 2 Light I 1 �\ e C� I 5' .::::........:::.::........ Car L_C�ar i II End ti�9Cu Curb Cut 1 I \ , \ r \ / I 1 r I ............:........................ Ki :::�:�:i;;�::<;:•:;::s.:%::::•::%::f::?:::�;;;:•;:-:;':::::;:�;5} :;i:-:;:::�::r:�;;::;:;;r:::;:::<:;;::::�:::::�::ti::S<:::;�::�::�••:i:t�:: ::i ;:;:::;�:;i:8 :�� : �:'• ?:=�?<:�:t :'`:�::•.:r;:>.r::•::;�:•:;•;:::>:;::•s;>:•:;:�:-z:: Kiii ::.8. . xx ` ....