Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
97-41P Cutler Ridge
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM Application No. : cl;7-ql P JUN 3 1997 Date Received: -/p SOUtiI Action/Public Hearing by: ��tidin Windsor Receipt No. $ A zoning Commission APPLICANT• Mannarino Builders, Inc. , C/o Mr. Robert Mannarino ADDRESS: 41. Oakland Road,_. South Windsor, CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS Regina M Bloz,ie ADDRESS: 860 Avery Street, South Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: #860 Avery Street (on the east side of Avery Street) Assessor's Map # 80 Parcel # 4 Zone RR NAME, ADDRESS, TEL & FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: Alford Associates, Inc. , C/O Mr. Wilson M. Alford, Jr. , P.O. Box 484, 200 Pigeon Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 Tel. 860-688-7288 Fax 860-688-3485 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply) : _1 . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) d X 2. Subdivision/Resubdivision a. _ Subdivision Minor Major b. _ Resubdivision Minor Major (Public Hearing Required) c. Conditional Approval d. X Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) _3. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) _4. Site Plan of Development _5. General Plan of Development _6. Earth Filling (Sec. 101 and/or Earth Removal (Sec. 9] (Public Hearing Required) , _7. Regulation Amendment: Zoning Subdivision _8. Amendment to Town Plan of Development _9. Temporary and Conditional Permit 10. Other (explain in detail) : Owne pplic nt (See reverse side for additional information) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED SUBMISSION DOC@iENTS SUBDIVISI/ONS/RBSUBDMSIONS APPLICANT �QNIfQQINO �(l(�DEQ�, llffi, A/ n pt / PROJECT NAME (_ U�,FR , KIn GE U�OQ he'eq 5 rf'f' This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E/L.S) declaring that all required information is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied. Subdivision --------7--------- IMinor I Regular I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION I I A. General Information I 1. Appl. & owner name, address x ( x 2. Engineer & land surveyor name, address, license no. & seal x x 3. Key map at 1" - 100' scale showing location of tract with reference to surrounding properties, streets, x x municipal boundaries, etc. , within 500' . Key map must include layout of streets with names, layout of lots and lot nos. , open space land, and names of surrounding property owners. I ✓ 4. A schedule of..,_required and provided zoning district requirements including lot area, lot frontage, lot depth, x x yard setbacks, open space, variances granted, etc. 5. North arrow and scale. x ( x I I 6. Appropriate certification b+ ,ck. x ( x I I 7. Date of original and all revisions. ( x x 8. Name of development. x x I • i B. Plot plan at 1" - 40' scale on standard 18" x 24" or 24" x 36" sheets -with a 1/2" ruled margin containing the following data. x x _Developments.,which require more than two 24" x 36" sheets may submit the plot plan at 1" - 100' scale. - � 1. Metes and bounds description showing dimensions , bearings, curve data, length i ------- r ---Minor Regular ---- of tangents , radii, arcs, chords, and x x central angles for all centerlines and rights-of-way, and centerline curves on streets. Monuments are required at corners and angles of all new streets and new street lines , at all points' of curvature and tangency, and at critical corners and angles of all new Town open space. Coordinates for monuments shall be in tabular form. I I 2. MDC or CGS datum shall be used on all subdivisions accessible to controls. The Town Engineer shall determine the accessibility of these controls. I i tl 3. Lot layout numbers, square footage of all lots, and all lot dimensions. Iron pins are required at all property, angle ( x x points . 4 . Yard setbacks dimensioned. x ( x 5. Easements , noting .grantors, grantees, � . and purpose. x x i I ' 6. Proposed buildings and other structures. x x 7. Development phasing, if proposed. x x 8. Names of abutting property .owners. x x I I 9. Proposed street names. x x I I ' 10 . All open space reserved for common or public uses . ( x ( x I' I v 11. A-2 certification & PE/LS seals. x ( x I I II. SETTING/ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Topographic map at same scale as plot plan containing all data included on the plot plan plus the following: I I - �/ 1. All existing structures, stree•1- , wetlands and watercourses, or other environmentally (exist'91 sensitive areas, including enough data Istructsl beyond property boundaries to allow a (streets ) x reasonable evaluation of the property's lwetlndsl ecological relationship to surrounding Jfldpin I areas , 100 yr. floodplain. I * I x 2. Existing and proposed contours to extend x at least 200' beyond subject property, as follows (town mapping) : 100' x up to 3x grade: _ 1' contour interval . � 3Z grade & over: 2' contour interval i I -� 3 . Boundary limits, nature, and extent of ---------------------- ---Minor Regular woodedareas , specimen trees, and other x x significant physical features. 4. Existing system of drainage of subject site and of any larger tract or basin of which it is a part (can use Town x x stormwater study) . S. Drainage area map. ( * x 6. Drainage calculations * x 7. Perc test data, preliminary indication i I of septic system feasibility if individual sanitary sewerage systems * x provided. III. IMPROVEMENTS & CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION ' ' 1. Proposed utility infrastructure plans, including sanitary sewer, water, storm ( * ( x water management. 2. Spot and finished elevations at all property corners, corners of all � . structures or dwellings, existing or x x proposed first floor elevations. (. 3. Construction details (per standard specs. ) �.. * ( x I I 4 . ' Road and paving cross-sections (per standard specs) . i * i X . V 5. Proposed street names. x 6. Lighting plan and details. 7. Landscape plan and details. 8•. Dumpsters (if needed) . L/ 9. Site identifications signs, traffic control signs, and directional signs. * x 10. Sight triangles at new road intersections. * . ( x 11. Sight triangles at driveway entrance. x 12. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation I patterns (less detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan, and * x general plan of development. 13. Parking plan showing spaces, size and type, aisle width, curb cuts, drives, driveways, and all ingress & egress - � areas and dimensions. 14. Plans and profiles . (l" - 40' _ TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST OF REQDI]= SUBMISSION DOCUKENTS -// SUBDIVISI-rONSJRESUBDIVISIONS APPLICANT tjdWWVINO 6111bak5 Iwo. A q PROJECT NAME �U�(�FiZ �CAE�� UIQQ �f✓�Q� �� This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E/L.S) declaring that all required information is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied. Subdivision ------------------ IMinor I Regular I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION I I I I I 1 A. General Information I I .Y_ 1. Appl. & owner name, address I x I x 2. Engineer & land surveyor name, address, license no. & seal I x I x 3. Key map at 1" - 100, scale showing I I location of tract with reference to I I surrounding properties, streets, , I x I x municipal boundaries, etc. , within I I 500' . Key map must include layout I I of streets with names, layout of lots I and lot nos . , open space land, and I I names of surrounding property owners. 4 A schedule of required and provided I I zoning district requirements including I I lot area, lot frontage, lot depth, I x X. yard setbacks, open space, variances I I granted, etc.... . 5. North arrow and scale. I x I x - I I 6. Appropriate certification b.' )ck. I x I x 7. Date of original and all revisions. I x I x 8. Name of development. I x I x ' B. Plot plan at 1" - 40' scale on standard I I 18" x 24" or 24" x 36" sheets with a 1/2" ruled margin containing the following data. I x I x Developments which require more than two 24" x 36" sheets may, submit the plot plan I I at 1" = 100' scale. � I -.1. Metes and-bounds description showing dimensions , bearings, curve data, length I I Y ^^' ---------------------- . ---Minor Regular wooded areas , specimen trees, and other x x significant physical features. 4. Existing system of drainage of subject site and of any larger tract or basin of which it is a part (can use Town j- x x stormwater study) . 5. Drainage area map. *. f x 6 . Drainage calculations * x 7. Perc test data, preliminary indication of septic system feasibility if individual sanitary sewerage systems * ( x provided. III. IMPROVEMENTS & CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION I- Proposed utility infrastructure-plans, V � including sanitary sewer, water, storm * x water management. 2. Spot and finished elevations at all property corners, corners of all structures or dwellings, existing or x x proposed first floor elevations. ( f f 3. Construction details (per standard specs. ) i . * I x 4 . ' Road and paving cross-sections (per standard specs) . i * i x j/ 5. Proposed street names. ( x I f 6. Lighting plan and details. 7 Landscape plan and details. 8'. Dumpsters (if needed) . 9. Site identifications signs, traffic f control signs, and directional signs. * x _(1,0> Sight triangles at new road intersections. * x ' 1 Sight triangles at driveway entrance. x 12. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns (less detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan, and * x general plan of development. 13. Parking plan showing spaces, size and type, aisle width, curb cuts, drives, driveways, and all ingress & egress - � areas and dimensions. /� 14. Plans and profiles . (1" - 40' �w qzx NR4 N /U �P IIa J,,g:;P s-r C5, - 0 V 4 f nM- d "U Vr i i LUtA Itii "k ij t* UN ST�I-E,:T SL='IDIART OF CONNEC-CUT WATER KgViC , • C UN TION,CaN N ECTICU Ti C 6 4 3� 16 GO TEL - 1996 6f iovenabt�r"6, la-A=mg Lzd Own IT-a-r, 0 Sul Av=ae South wind-sar, CT 05,374 r Ke: Pbblic :E�amPR to --�4210,Apple Ap-H Dear W. L,vacic my Sr L.1 aCo te q plit '- fae h o p +-A zdac� afi' Ta as- Well w came v :nnnm �e el cc d v.Liy actv�dcs faat ccic] im-act,t"i irmlacealble dri�wdqg wawz su- ly szm�ce f�r Ld- - i Town o'SouEi L Ira We aTQ Cono-em-ed wina ta�- I-einac,"s To ---")wadNN Iter hicrerse ia noa-polut pobl k (m lb a--L" - -i - - ql m� i � , igthat ocwC0 i ta o - Eaffi lel'on-75-ie lail on !s fte ce�eddenity. We .;,ndnZ10ZL fofeev - + - bd r ces. sit- "- Ove (wen 'We 0 -.Y ofth e snlzdMvctpla-tis for t.-;�s pin�j et i h avafi-iojc�) for our Soxce protezilo-a is a V,�tLl' cd--Ile Ccaane M-�Cw,"Water commaav we o7portunjt:, L y-o conizoat oa Plop 3sals L May dl---t CVUX so-arcf"S 0-- If(I Soun;,-Prottiv4ora rf cc, WFG, DFL J!, M,�- ariak) 7--Ao • WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. ' ENGINEERS Is SURVEYORS • WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD ■ P.O. BOX 484 ■ WINDSOR ■ CT 06095 ■ PHONE (203) 688-7288 ■ FAX (203) 688-3485 LIST OF ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AT 860 AVERY STREET PREPARED FOR: MANNARINO BUILDERS, INC. JUNE 3, 1997 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 80 PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 4 SUBJECT REGINA M. BLOZIE 860 AVERY STREET 5 KENNTH & STELLA MCLINTOCK 812 AVERY STREET 15 WILLIAM H. & MARIE G. BARON 29 APPLE TREE LANE 16 CONNECTICUT WATER BOX 511 , CLINTON, CT COMPANY 06413 18 MARK & LORRIE A. COHEN 69 PINE KNOB DRIVE 19 ANDREW M. , JR. & EVELYN D. KRELLER 75 PINE KNOB DRIVE 20 JOSEPH E. & MARILYN J . SCHOEN 83 PINE KNOB DRIVE 21 ROVERT V. & JANE M. MAHONEY 91 PINE KNOB DRIVE 22 JASON D. & KATHLEEN A. RACE 99 PINE KNOB DRIVE 23 PAUL H . & IRENE H . HINDLEY 107 PINE KNOB DRIVE 24 MICHAEL J . & DARLENE EAGEN 115 PINE KNOB DRIVE NOTE: ALL ADDRESSES REFER TO THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALFORD/MANNARINO -2- 6/3/97 ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS 860 AVERY STREET ASSESSOR'S MAP NO. 80 PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 25 JAMES M. & CARLA G. NEISWANGER 123 PINE KNOB DRIVE 26 WILLIAM & MARY A. ROMEO 131 PINE KNOB DRIVE 27 HELEN L. WELCH 3 MURRAY ROAD 28 ROBERT A. & SUSAN E. DOWDING 11 MURRAY ROAD ASSESSOR' S MAP NO. 93 7 RONCALLI INSTITUTE, P.O. BOY. 427 INC. PORTLAND, CT 06480 10 GLADYS L. & DAVID M. BLOZIE & CYNTHIA ROBINSON 882 AVERY STREET NOTE: ALL ADDRESSES REFER TO THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. r Town of South Windsor Police Services In House Referral Comment Sheet 97-41 P Cutter Ridge Subdivision Please note the following concerns concerning the Cutter Ridge Subdivision: There is a strong sight line concern. The plans do not reflect the sight distances for vehicles entering Avery Street from Cutter Ridge. The street entering Avery Street is almost at the crest of a hill. South bound traffic on Avery Street will have a difficult time seeing vehicles exiting Cutter Ridge, as will vehicles that are exiting Cutter Ridge, trying to see South bound Avery Street traffic. Currently there is a "Blind Driveway" sign for Southbound Avery Street traffic, just North of where the Cutter Ridge entrance/exit will be. Currently there is a driveway where the street is going to be. A PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Sargent Mike Ritter, Fire M Wing, Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mel Stead FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: n Zone _ Acreage L. Commercial / Subdiv � Site Plan Residential # of Lots/Units ��o Industrial Location: n Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No (a) new streets V (existing frontage also) (b) new open space/recreation area active passive �1 (c) new detention area Planning Department comments: Please let me know by �r0 %l'? if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. Thank you. t , ool From:Bruce R.Hlilson,P.E.Traffic Engineering Solutions Fax:(860)669-0626 call bus.no before faxing)Voice:(860)6673679 To:South Windsor Planning&Commission Pape 3 of 3 Thirsday,July 03,1997 12:48:24 P A Traffic Engineering Solutions,P.C. 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 June 13, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders Inc. 41 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob: Traffic Engineering Solutions is pleased to submit the findings of our study to review the sight distance available to drivers turning onto and from the access road serving the proposed 26-lot residential subdivision on Avery- Street in South Windsor. The work done during the course of this study included: • Field Observations of existing sight distances along Avery Street; • Review of the Avery Street profile prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. prepared in conjunction with the subdivision plan; • Review of the sight distances provided from the proposed access road, • Determining the travel speed on Avery Street; • Determining whether adjustments should be made to Avery Street to provide additional sight distance for vehicles turning onto and from the subdivision access road. Summary of Findings It is important to provide adequate sight distance for drivers making the left turn from Avery Street onto the access road and for drivers approaching from the opposite direction along Avery Street. The sight distance allows the driver making the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate and complete the turn before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a risk. For vehicles approaching from the opposite direction, the sight distance should be-adequate to allow them to proceed at their current speed without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning vehicle, and if necessary, provide them with the time to recognize the need to stop, react to that need, and stop before encountering the problem. The Avery Street profile south of the site access road will provide intermittent visibility of vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. The profile allows a sight distance of several hundred feet before oncoming vehicles disappear into a dip in the road and re-enter the line of sight after several seconds. The analysis conducted for this study addressed the sight distance to the location at which vehicles re-enter the line of sight. The existing roadway profile on Avery Street allows a sight distance of approximately 315 feet looking south from Station 6-67, approximately seven feet north of the sewer manhole in the center of Avery Street near the northerly edge of the proposed c:\businessl\4amlariri\findvigs.doc From:Bruce A.Hillson,P.E.Traffic Fngineering Solutions Fax:(860)6594626 call bus,no before faxing)Voice:(860)6673579 To:South Windsor Planning&Commission Pape 2 of 3 Thursday,July03,1997 12:47:09 P access road. This is the sight distance that drivers will have when initiating a left turn from southbound Avery Street onto the access road from this location. Similarly, drivers approaching from the south will have the same 315-foot sight distance to observe vehicles turning onto the site. The sight distance from this location, where most drivers will initiate there turn onto the access road, is adequate for vehicles approaching from the south at speeds up to 43 miles per hour to react and stop if necessary. The sight distance from twenty feet further north(Station 6187) is approximately 295 feet. The lesser distance from this location, where some drivers may initiate the turn onto the access road, is adequate for drivers approaching from the south at speeds up to 41 mph to react and stop if necessary. The posted speed limit on Avery Street is 30 miles per hour(mph). The South Windsor Police Department has not conducted a speed study of vehicles traveling Avery Street in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. A spot speed study was done using the floating car method to determine the speed of vehicles traveling Avery Street. This floating car method involves following vehicles traveling Avery Street and noting their speed of travel. The spot speed study indicates that most drivers approaching the subdivision access road from the south travel at speeds ranging from 31 to 41 miles per hour(mph) with most vehicles traveling at speeds of 37 to 38 mph. Vehicles approaching the access road from the north were observed to travel at speeds of 36 to 40 mph, typically at speeds near the higher end of this range. Sight distances from the access drive were reviewed and found to be approximately 525 feet looking to the right(north)and greater than 600 feet looking toward the left. The Connecticut DOT uses desirable and minimum standards for intersection sight distances(ISD). The sight distance looking toward the right exceeds their desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 40 mph on Avery Street and their minimum ISD for vehicles traveling at 50 mph. The sight distance looking toward the left exceeds ConnDOT's desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 45 mph on Avery Street. The sight distances looking in both directions from the access road will meet or exceed the desirable intersection sight distance for the speeds drivers were observed to travel on Avery Street. The sight distance available for drivers turning left from Avery Street onto the site access road and for vehicles approaching from the south is more than adequate to allow oncoming drivers to react and stop, if necessary, for the speeds observed during the spot speed study. The site access road as designed should provide safe access for drivers entering and leaving the subdivision for the observed speeds with no modifications to the existing conditions on Avery Street. Sincerely, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, P.C. Bruce A. Hillson, P.E. c.\businesslMaunmin\findings.do c pWN 3f4 C .J 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 S0a•Cor AREA CODE 860/644-2511 Date: June 18, 1997 To: Alford Associates Inc. 299 Pigeon Hill Road Windsor, CT 06095 From: Jeffrey H. Folger Zoning/Wetland Officer Town of South Windsor Re: Review of Cutler Ridge Subdivision- Plans dated 6/3/97 I have reviewed the site plans for the proposed Cutler Ridge subdivision with the following comments: 1. Runoff calculations for the stormdrain system, detention basin and level spreader should be provided. 2. Catchbasin#6 should be designed as a sediment structure similar to catchbasin#10. 3. The narrative mentions phasing of the project, phasing lines should be drawn on all sheets of the site plan. A separate construction and E&S narrative should be produced for each phase. 4. Perimeter silt fencing is proposed, additional silt fencing should be added along the downhill side of the proposed road to contain sediments closer to the source of disturbance. 5. The 40 foot regulated buffer should be shown on the plans. 6. The design of the detention basin and biofilter/level spreader should maximize the travel time of stormwater flowing through the system. The longer the residence time of stormwater, the more opportunity for assimilation of nutrients and other pollutants by the plant community and finer sediments will precipitate out. 7. The basins should be designed to provide areas of microrelief where more saturated conditions prevail. Different planting should be proposed in these areas to provide a higher degree of biofiltration by utlilizing species known for their propensity to uptake pollutants. 8. Due to the fact that this revision only became avaliable to this office last week, other comments may be forthcoming. cc. Town Engineer Town Planner IWA/CC Mannarino Builders CUTLER RIDGE OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIO ning Data Table 1 90 X 90 buildable square must be addressed on the plans or a note added that all lots - comply with Sec. 10.2b of the zoning regulations P�,ot Plan V plot plan must be submitted showing building lines (must be coincident with or /outside of easement areas) a square footage of lots shown easements with grantor and grantee must be identified Cwnership of the islands and open space should be indicated proposed phase lines s ould be shown on the plans (particularly if you intend to have bonding done by phases) 6 tructures to be removed should be noted on the plans Topography Plan limits of tree clearing should be shown on the plans 2. site triangles for individual lots (particularly on curves) and street intersections should be shown General Comments d! Street tree and landscaping requirements must be addressed. If street trees are proposed, a 10' wide street tree easement must be provided. There is a note on sheet 4 (note#21)that is no longer is required. (The street tree requirement has replaced this requirement.) Is there any landscaping proposed in the island areas? WPCA- (Fred Shaw) 1. WPCA approval is required. 2. Sewer laterals for all lots should be shown on the plans. How are lots 1, 2, 3, 17, 18, 19 and 20 going to be connected to the sewers? 3. Sewers should be kept in the roadway. Sewer easements, profile and details of the cross country sewer must be provided. 4. No sewer has been shown on Chandler Drive. 5. Plans are inadequate at this time in regards to the sewer. L 1 illy�,` � � r• J � '_� 000 I � may � I 6 n _ Cc j/YtJd�ctdl 1Zv r L/r - z _ IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW GROUP MEETING Thursday, June 26, 1997, 9:30 a.m., 5prenkel Room TO: John Collins Jerry lazzetta �ET� Michael Gantick Bill Lanning �® Mike Ritter Fred Shaw 1 Karl Reichle Ray Favreau `` Mel Stead Matt Galligan Gary Tyler Ralph Hedenberg Jeff Folger Bob Deptula FROM: Marcia 5anach/Michele Lipe The following applications/poposal will be reviewed at this meeting. Plans are available in the Planning Department for your advance review. 1. Appl. #97-411'Cutler Ridge Open Space Subdivision- Request for 20 lot open Space subdivision on 35+acres, located on the westerly side of Avery Street, northerly of fine Knob Circle, RR zone. 2. Appl. #97-45P, Capital Moving and Storage Site flan- Request for site plan approval for a 45,000 Square foot building on 17+acres, located on the westerly side of Route 5 and northerly side of Strong Road, I zone. 0 Town of • • • Planning Department Memo To: Rob Mannarino From: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning CC: Skip Alford Date: 06/27/97 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision At a Town staff development review meeting on Thursday, June 27, 1997, the following concerns were identified for Cutler Ridge. 1. General incompleteness of plans (e.g., no plot plan, no landscaping plan, missing information on submitted plans) 2. SIGHT LINE for new road at Avery Streetll As proposed on submitted plans 3. Road island radii: (a)what are they, (b)can utility vehicles fit around islands 4. Test pits? Groundwater concerns? 5. Sidewalks recommended on both sides of cul-de-sac streets (children can't cross landscaped islands to get to sidewalk on other side to get to school bus pickup) 6. Cross sections across cul-de-sacs needed 7. Additional engineering concerns; Town Engineer wants to meet with you &Alford Associates •Page 1 THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY T' C W C GENERAL OFFICE: 93 WEST MAIN STREET A SUBSIDIARY OF CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC. CLINTON,CONNECTICUT 06413-1600 TEL.860-669-8636 July 7, 1997 D , T- :IVE Mr. Russell Levack, Chairman AL 10 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission Town Hall South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue {'fanning i;ini':Q Car South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Public Hearing- Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Avery Road Applicant- Robert Mannarino Dear Mr. Levack: The Connecticut Water Company has received a copy of the plans for the above proposed project. This project is located adjacent to our Pine Knob public drinking water supply well. Therefore we are concerned with any activities that could impact this important and irreplaceable public drinking water supply source for the Town of South Windsor. I have reviewed the site plan prepared by Alford Associates dated June 3, 1997, and would like to offer the following comments. 1. Underground fuel storage tanks should be prohibited on this site. This should be noted on the site plan and included in the deeds to the individual lots. 2. The detention basin and other associated stormwater structures must be regularly maintained during and after construction activities. Either the Town or a homeowners association should be made responsible for the long-term maintenance of these structures. 3. The prospective homeowners for lot#'s 13 and 15 should be made aware that their properties abut a public drinking water supply well property and that the storage/disposal of noxious materials on the back of their property should be prohibited. All prospective homeowners within this subdivision should be made aware that the dumping of any materials/chemicals onto the ground or into the storm drainage system is prohibited. Source protection is a vital concern of The Connecticut Water Company and we appreciate the opportunity to comment on proposals that may affect ours sources of supply. Sincerely, 6-t- r Cindy S. Fazendeiro Source Protection Supervisor cc: WFG, DFL CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION PH 7/8/97 1. Application for a 26 lot open space subdivision located on the easterly side of Avery Street, north of Pine Knob Drive, RR zone. 2. Minimum lot size in the RR open space zone is 20,000 square feet; average lot area proposed is just over 24,000 square feet; minimum lot size proposed is 209000 square feet. The proposed number of lots is the maximum number allowed using the open space subdivision formula. Lots 9-11 have their frontage on Avery Street but access will be from an interior street. 3. Th open ace re 'rement f r this subd' ision is eithe 0 acres an a ount land a al to the erage lot ducrion perc age, w 'chewer is reater. a 1 cant ' pr F3.5 ' g a 3 °o reductl f the av, ge lot s'ze, s ric�t th prope , abou5 ac s, is req 'red for o n space. ie ap i providi g aboutac es of open space. Access into t�s open space is proposed from the new subdivision road, between lots 25 &26 over storm sewerage via a gravel base, grassed access road. 4. The Town Council has reviewed this proposed open space and, at the recommendation of the Open Space Task Force, approved the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has reviewed proposed Cutler Ridge open space located on the east side of Avery Street, north of Pine Knob Drive; and WHEREAS, the proposed open space received a marginally favorable rating for Town ownership because of(1) limited external and internal access; (2) overall location at the rear of the proposed subdivision; and (3) limited access and use resulting from the large wetland and proposed detention basin in the open space; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Open Space Task Force that the Town's interests would be best served by either (1) ownership of the proposed open space by a land trust or other private entity, or (2) recommendation to PZC that a fee in lieu of open space be accepted for this subdivision; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission pursue an option other than Town ownership for the proposed Cutler Ridge Subdivision open space. 5. Tl� 4ndi AW-whethe"—he-lot e-me-t the--90 X--90-buildable-square xequire-Hient -this-wil-f- d. It appears that all car zoning requirements have been met. 6. K44ter-an&-se—wmm-cava�l-dWrto-the4ite4omAvei-,,Stre-�. WPCA approval is required.—C S�vve_+� 7. There is a significant wetland area in the proposed open space. This application was aproved by IWA/CC on July 16 with a $10,000 bond and an approval condition that Phase II of the project cannot commence until spring of 1998. There is no 100 year floodplain. 8. Sidewalks have been shown on one side of Chandler Drive and part of Stedman Circle, ending at the intersection of Wells Lane and Stedman Circle. Staff note that our experience with the Charing Road extension, after which this design is modeled, was that new residents expressed a desire for sidewalks for their children to walk to the school bus pickup spot. Also, with cul-de-sac islands such as these, it is no longer a simple matter to cross to the other side of the street to use the sidewalk on one side of the street. Therefore, the Commission may want to consider sidewalks on both sides of the street. �s �tS b-f-P v, n_o 9. A Town staff have a real concern regarding sight line on Avery Street caused by a vertical curve in the street near the northern boundary of the subject propertyesolving the sight line issue is proving to be extremely difficult, and the applicant's engineers are working with staff to try to find a resolution. There are also some significant road design issues on the main interior loop street. The Town Engineer will discuss these concerns more fully in his report, and staff are requesting that this hearing be held open until August 12 so that all possible attempts can be made to find solutions to these issues. U C�1 Ce r-PA d `C C� �.a_- C a h Q`�� °�� r -C a'�,O y ►i. Cs �� �- why, e �'� veers ��"�`I �Dfe sz7 C,( ov-v, �1,i�v t cc�rr An a a ��`� lam` el// C W, 10. T ` a licant has submitte� a street tree an sho mg the es be'ng placed 1 'a 1' ' street tree easetent as requ red. e wc�u d note l t we on' t ink L& will be willing'to snare the utili` ea�rr} nt w't�i�treet es; i this si 'a 'off;we ask t t the 1ll0' str et trees za eme t loc`tad di ectly behind t e utility ease' t, with tP� own identified as a grantee. The applicant is proposing to plant Bradford pear trees, summit ash, plane trees and red sunset maple trees. The Town's tree warden suggests Chanticleer or Cleveland Select instead of Bradford Pear, Patmore instead of Summit Ash, and Keith�fdhn Norwegian Sunset hantung aple instead of Red Sunset Maple. If this application is approved, the planning department requests, in addition to modifications noted already, that building lines be shown coincident with e/asement lines1 F�a 4�t� w Ge told" Sf4 e ` y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 SOR•GO� July 8. 1997 Mr. Russell Levack, Chairperson Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue _ South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Dear Mr. Levack: At its Regular Meeting of July 7, 1997, the South Windsor Town Council approved the following Resolution: WHEREAS, the Open Space Task Force has reviewed proposed Cutler Ridge open space located on the east side of Avery Street, north of Pine Knob Drive, and WHEREAS, the proposed open space received a marginally favorable rating for Town ownership because of (1) limited external and internal access: (2) overall location at the rear of the proposed subdivision; and (3). limited access and use resulting from the large wetland and proposed detention basin in the open space; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the Open Space Task Force that the Town's interests would be best served by either (1) ownership of the proposed open space by a land trust or other private entity, or (2) recommendation to Planning and Zoning that a fee in lieu of open space be accepted for this subdivision NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission pursue an option other than Town ownership for the proposed Cutler Ridge Subdivision open space. ' Respectfully submitted, Patricia R. Brown Clerk of the Council Cc: Matthew B. Galligan, Town Manager Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Prb Town of • • • Planning Department Memo To: Rob Mannarino From: Marcia A. Banach,AICP, Director of Planning CC: Alford Associates Date: 07/09/97 Re: Cutler Ridge Subd. Planningreview comments for th Dept.p e revised plans submitted on July 1. On Plot Plan: ♦ Temporary cul-de-sac should be treated as a permanent cul-de-sac for building setback purposes ♦ 90 x 90 squares or note that all lots meet requirement? ♦ Project phasing? ♦ Existing structures in path of new roadway need to be identified as to be removed ♦ Ownership and maintenance of cul-de-sac islands and open space need to be identified General: ♦ Sheet 4; Note#21 is obsolete ♦ Welles Lane: is cul-de-sac in excess of 600' limitation prior to beginning of center island? (Appears to be) •Page 1 t �I Traffic Engineering Solutions,P.C. 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 July 11, 1997 i Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders Inc. 169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob: t Traffic Engineering Solutions is pleased to submit the findings of our study to review the sight distance available to drivers turning onto and from the access road serving the proposed 26-lot residential subdivision on Avery Street in South Windsor. The work j done during the course of this study included: • Field Observations of existing sight distances along Avery Street; • Review of the Avery Street profile prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. prepared in conjunction with the subdivision plan; • Review of the sight distances provided from the proposed access road; • Determining the travel speed on Avery Street; i • Determining whether adjustments should be made to Avery Street to provide additional sight distance for vehicles turning onto and from the subdivision access road; • Meeting with Town Staff at the site to review the sight distances available to drivers turning onto and from the site. Summary of Findings It is important to provide adequate sight distance for drivers making the left turn from Avery Street onto the access road and for drivers approaching from the opposite direction along Avery Street. The sight distance allows the driver making the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate and complete the turn before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a risk. For vehicles approaching from the opposite direction, the sight distance should be adequate to allow them to proceed at their current speed without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning vehicle, and if necessary, provide them with the time to recognize the need to stop, react to that need, and stop before encountering the problem. It is also important to provide adequate sight distance for vehicles turning left or right from the site onto Avery Street to assure that they are able to safely enter the flow of traffic. Avery Street has a dip in its profile approximately 300 feet south of the hill crest and site access road. The access road to the subdivision has been located and designed to account for the depression in Avery Street and provide the best sight distances for vehicles entering or leaving the site and traveling Avery Street past the site access road. The site c:\busijiess\Mannarin\ltiTprt.doc access road has been designed with a 15-foot island at its intersection with Avery Street. The island separates the exit and entrance lanes of the access road and locates them to assure that the sight distances meet or exceed design criteria to provide safe turning operations at this intersection. The center of the entrance portion of the access road has been located at approximately Station 6+15. Vehicles will likely initiate their turns from southbound Avery Street at approximately Station 6+45 (about 30 feet north of the entrance). From this location, drivers will have continuous visibility to the bottom of the hill and to vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. Similarly, drivers approaching from the south will have the same continuous visibility to observe vehicles as they turn onto the site. The center of the exit lane of the access road is located at approximately Station 6+50. Sight distances from the exit lane were found to be approximately 525.feet looking to the right(north) and greater than 600 feet looking toward the left. The Connecticut DOT uses desirable and minimum standards for intersection sight distances (ISD). The sight distance looking toward the right exceeds their desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 40 mph on Avery Street and their minimum ISD for vehicles traveling at 50 mph. The sight distance looking toward the left exceeds ConnDOT's desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 45 mph on Avery Street. The South Windsor Police Department has not conducted a speed study of vehicles traveling Avery Street in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. A spot speed study was done using the floating car method to determine the speed of vehicles traveling Avery Street. This floating car method involves following vehicles traveling Avery Street and noting their speed of travel. The spot speed study indicates that most drivers approaching the subdivision access road from the south travel at speeds ranging from 31 to 41 miles per hour(mph) with most vehicles traveling at speeds of 37 to 38 mph. Vehicles approaching the access road from the north were observed to travel at speeds of 36 to 40 mph, typically at speeds near the higher end of this range. The sight distance available for drivers turning left from Avery Street onto the site access road and for vehicles approaching from the south will be continuous from the bottom of the hill. This will allow turning vehicles to decide if an adequate gap exists to make the turn and for oncoming drivers to react and stop, if necessary. The sight distances looking in both directions from the access road will meet or exceed the desirable intersection sight distance for the speeds drivers were observed to travel on Avery Street The site access road as designed should provide safe access for drivers entering and leaving the subdivision for the observed speeds with no modifications to the existing conditions on Avery Street. Sincerely, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, P.C. Bruce A. Hillson, P.E. c:\business\Maruiarin\ltnpri.doc Traffic Engineering Solutions,P.C. 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 July 11, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders Inc. 169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob: Traffic Engineering Solutions is pleased to submit the findings of our study to review the sight distance available to drivers turning onto and from the access road serving the proposed 26-lot residential subdivision on Avery Street in South Windsor. The work done during the course of this study included: • Field Observations of existing sight distances along Avery Street; • Review of the Avery Street profile prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. prepared in conjunction with the subdivision plan; • Review of the sight distances provided from the proposed access road; • Determining the travel speed on Avery Street; • Determining whether adjustments should be made to Avery Street to provide additional sight distance for vehicles turning onto and from the subdivision access road; • Meeting with Town Staff at the site to review the sight distances available to drivers turning onto and from the site. Summary of Findings It is important to provide adequate sight distance for drivers making the left turn from Avery Street onto the access road and for drivers approaching from the opposite direction along Avery Street. The sight distance allows the driver making the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate and complete the turn before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a risk For vehicles approaching from the opposite direction, the sight distance should be adequate to allow them to proceed at their current speed without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning vehicle, and if necessary, provide them with the time to recognize the need to stop, react to that need, and stop before encountering the problem. It is also important to provide adequate sight distance for vehicles turning left or right from the site onto Avery Street to assure that they are able to safely enter the flow of traffic. Avery Street has a dip in its profile approximately 300 feet south of the hill crest and site access road. The access road to the subdivision has been located and designed to account for the depression in Avery Street and provide the best sight distances for vehicles entering or leaving the site and traveling Avery Street past the site access road. The site cAbusiness\Mam,6n\K"rt.doc r access road has been designed with a 15-foot island at its intersection with Avery Street. The island separates the exit and entrance lanes of the access road and locates them to assure that the sight distances meet or exceed design criteria to provide safe turning operations at this intersection. The center of the entrance portion of the access road has been located at approximately Station 6+15. Vehicles will likely initiate their turns from southbound Avery Street at approximately Station 6+45 (about 30 feet north of the entrance)_ From this location, drivers will have continuous visibility to the bottom of the hill and to vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. Similarly, drivers approaching from the south will have the same continuous visibility to observe vehicles as they turn onto the site. The center of the exit lane of the access road is located at approximately Station 6+50. Sight distances from the exit lane were found to be approximately 525 feet looking to the right(north) and greater than 600 feet looking toward the left. The Connecticut DOT uses desirable and minimum standards for intersection sight distances (ISD). The sight distance looking toward the right exceeds their desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 40 mph on Avery Street and their minimum ISD for vehicles traveling at 50 mph. The sight distance looking toward the left exceeds ConnDOT's desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 45 mph on Avery Street. The South Windsor Police Department has not conducted a speed study of vehicles traveling Avery Street in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. A spot speed study was done using the floating car method to determine the speed of vehicles traveling Avery Street. This floating car method involves following vehicles traveling Avery Street and noting their speed of travel. The spot speed study indicates that most drivers approaching the subdivision access road from the south travel at speeds ranging from 31 to 41 miles per hour(mph)with most vehicles traveling at speeds of 37 to 38 mph. Vehicles approaching the access road from the north were observed to travel at speeds of 36 to 40 mph,typically at speeds near the higher end of this range. The sight distance available for drivers turning left from Avery Street onto the site access road and for vehicles approaching from the south will be continuous from the bottom of the hill. This will allow turning vehicles to decide if an adequate gap exists to make the turn and for oncoming drivers to react and stop, if necessary. The sight distances looking in both directions from the access road will meet or exceed the desirable intersection sight distance for the speeds drivers were observed to travel on Avery Street The site access road as designed should provide safe access for drivers entering and leaving the subdivision for the observed speeds with no modifications to the existing conditions on Avery Street. Sincerely, TRAFFIC ENCANEEIMU SOLUTIONS, P.C. Bruce A. Mllson,P.E. c:\Uusiness\Mannarin\1trrprt.doc From:Bruce A.Hillson,P.E.Traffic Engineering Solutions Fax:(860)669-0626 call bus.no before faxing)Voice:(860)6673679 To:South Windsor Planning 97..oning Commission Pape 3 of 3 Wednesday,July IS,199T 2 - l ` I Traffic Engineering Solutions,P.C. 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 July 11, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders Inc. 169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob: Traffic Engineering Solutions is pleased to submit the findings of our study to review the sight distance available to drivers turning onto and from the access road serving the proposed 26-lot residential subdivision on Avery Street in South Windsor, The work done during the course of this study included: • Field Observations of existing sight distances along Avery Street; • Review of the Avery Street profile prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. prepared in conjunction with the subdivision plan; • Review of the sight distances provided from the proposed access road; • Determining the travel speed on Avery Street; • Determining whether adjustments should be made to Avery Street to provide additional sight distance for vehicles turning onto and from the subdivision accessroad; • Meeting with Town Staff at the site to review the sight distances available to drivers turning onto and from the site. Summary of Findings It is important to provide adequate sight distance for drivers making the left turn from Avery Street onto the access road and for drivers approaching from the opposite direction along Avery Street. The sight distance allows the driver making the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate and complete the turn before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a risk. For vehicles approaching from the opposite direction, the sight distance should be adequate to allow them to proceed at their current speed without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning vehicle, and if necessary, provide them with the time to recognize the need to stop, react to that need, and stop before encountering the problem. It is also important to provide adequate sight distance for vehicles turning left or right from the site onto Avery Street to assure that they are able to safely enter the flow of traffic. Avery Street has a dip in its profile approximately 300 feet south of the hill crest and site access road. The access road to the subdivision has been located and designed to account for the depression in Avery Street and provide the best sight distances for vehicles entering or leaving the site and traveling Avery Street past the site access road. The site c AbusinessWmmarinVtrrprt.do c From:Bruce A.Hillson,P E.Traffic Engineering Solutions Fax: 860 669.0626 call bus.no before fxxing Voice:860 667-3679 To,South Windsor Planning&Zonin Commission Page 2 of 3 Wednesda July 16,1997 2 0 0 { ) G) i ) 0 0 v 9 Y, Y a access road has been designed with a 15-foot island at its intersection with Avery Street. The island separates the exit and entrance lanes of the access road and locates theirs to assure that the sight distances meet or exceed design criteria to provide safe turning operations at this intersection. The center of the entrance portion of the access road has been located at approximately Station 6+15. Vehicles will likely initiate their tarns from southbound Avery Street at approximately Station 6+45 (about 30 feet north of the entrance). From this location, drivers will have continuous visibility to the bottom of the hill and to vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. Similarly, drivers approaching from the south will have the same continuous visibility to observe vehicles as they turn onto the site. The center of the exit lane of the access road is located at approximately Station 6+50. Sight distances from the exit lane were found to be approximately 525 feet looking to the right(north) and greater than 600 feel looking toward the tell.. The Connecticut DOT uses desirable and minimum standards for intersection sight distances (ISD). The sight distance looking toward the right exceeds their desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 40 mph on Avery Street and their minimum ISD for vehicles traveling at 50 mph. The sight distance looking toward the left exceeds ConnDOT's desirable ISD for vehicles traveling 45 mph on Avery Street. The South Windsor Police Department has not conducted a speed study of vehicles traveling Avery Street in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. A spot speed study was done using the floating car method to determine the speed of vehicles traveling Avery Street. This floating car method involves following vehicles traveling Avery Street and noting their speed of travel. The spot speed study indicates that most drivers approaching the subdivision access road from the south travel at speeds ranging from 31 to 41 miles per hour(mph) with most vehicles traveling at speeds of 37 to 38 mph. Vehicles approaching the access road from the north were observed to travel at speeds of 36 to 40 mph, typically at speeds near the higher end of this range. The sight distance available for drivers turning left from Avery Street onto the site access road and for vehicles approaching from the south will be continuous from the bottom of the hill. This will allow turning vehicles to decide if an adequate gap exists to make the turn and for oncoming drivers to react and stop, if necessary. The sight distances looking in both directions from the access road will meet or exceed the desirable intersection sight distance for the speeds drivers were observed to travel on Avery Street The site access road as designed should provide safe access for drivers entering and leaving the subdivision for the observed speeds with no modifications to the existing conditions on Avery Street. Sincerely, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, P,C, Bruce A. Hillson, P.E. cAusinessWannarinlapit.do c CERTIFIED MAIL July 18, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge At the July 16, 1997 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved appl #97-41 P - IWA/CC permit for the construction of stormwater structures associated with the subdivision of property to create 26 lots to be known as "Cutler Ridge" on property located at 860 Avery Street, RR zone as shown on plans prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. and revised through July 11, 1997. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. 2. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on July 16, 2002. It has been IWA/CC's policy to notify landowner(s)/applicant(s) of expiring wetland permits. However, it is the landowner(s)/applicant(s) responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 5. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. 7. We recommend a bond is the amount of$10,000 to be submitted to the Planning 8v Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures. 8. The final plans shall show phasing of the project to be approved by Town Staff. 9. Phase II of the project is not to commence until spring of 1998. 10. This approval is subject to the comments of the Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer dated June 18, 1997. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairman EAW/pmm Cc: Chief Building Official Planning 8s Zoning Commission Town Engineer Alford Associates, Inc. 1, Town of South Windsor . Police Services In House Referral Comment Sheet On 21 Jul 97, 1 conducted an on-site inspection of the proposed Cutler Ridge Development on Avery Street at the driveway to 860 Avery Street, Regina Blozie, for the sight line north and south of the proposed road, Chandler Drive. Upon inspection I found that the sight line to the north was hindered because of the crest of the hill on Avery Street. From the present driveway looking north the sight line is 391 feet to see a full size motor vehicle at the present elevation. The stopping sight distance for an average running speed of 40 MPH on a downgrade of—6% is 380-455 feet. Which at present is with within the acceptable tolerance of sight line stopping distances, low end. It is my understanding that the west lane of Chandler Drive exiting onto Avery Street will be moved north of the present driveway by about 15 feet with a lowering of the grade to met Avery Street. If the grade is lowered at Chandler Drive and nothing is done to lower the crest of the roadway on Avery Street to compensate for the lowering of Chandler Drive the sight line will not be within acceptable tolerances. There will be motor vehicle crashes on Avery Street at Chandler Drive due to the sight line problem. The sight line south on Avery Street from the existing driveway is excellent, 600 feet plus. Sergeant E. Thomas Field Manager, Traffic Unit cc: Cmd. T. Hart Jerry lazzetta Michele Lipp THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY W C GENERAL OFFICE: 93 WEST MAIN STREET C A SUBSIDIARY OF CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC. / CLINTON,CONNECTICUT 06413-1600 TEL.860-669-8636 July 23, 1997 RECEIVED Ms. Marcia B anach Town Planner JUL 28 1997 Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING Re: Public Hearing- Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Avery Road Applicant- Robert Mannarino Dear Ms. Banach: Please be advised The Connecticut Water Company would be concerned with any major changes that may be proposed by either the town or the applicant regarding this application. We are concerned with the potential impacts a major change could have on the water quality to our Pine Knobb well. I would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on any such changes prior to the issuance of any approvals or permits. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Cindy S. Fazendeiro Source Protection Supervisor cc: WFG, DFL R Mannarino B. Fleet MEMORANDUM TO: Russell Levack, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: July 23, 1997 RE: SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS With the application of Cutler Ridge Subdivision, we have noted that the "Boulevard Style" roadway is once again being presented. If this type of roadway is to become a standard in South Windsor, the need for developing guidelines for this type of road becomes a priority. I plan on going forward with the development guidelines and if the timing is right, I hope to utilize the committee currently working on the complete revision of our Public Improvement Specifications. I would also like to propose that a representative of the Planning & Zoning Commission join this committee so we will be able to include the Commission's thoughts in the guidelines. I would appreciate your reviewing my proposal and ask that you advise as to your Commission's decision on this matter. JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning ' MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer In DATE: July 23, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the revised drawings dated July 11, 1997 for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision (received July 16, 1997) and the revised drainage calculations dated July 16, 1997 and have the following comments: Drainage Calculations 1. The gutter flow analysis indicates that CB #5 will have a width of flow of 12 feet and that CB #7 will have a width of flow of 14 feet. This will require additional catch basins to reduce the width of flow to 6.5 feet or less. Traffic Analysis 1. We have a concern about the proposed intersection of Chandler Drive and Avery Street. Avery Street in this area is a series of hills causing sight line concerns. The traffic report presented by Traffic Engineering Solutions indicates that a "spot speed study"was done and found that the speed of vehicles approaching the site from the south was from 31 to 41 MPH with most at 37 to 38 MPH. Vehicles approaching from the north traveled at 36 to 40 MPH. The report also indicates that intersection sight distance looking north (right) is 525 feet and looking south (left) is greater than 600 feet. Sargent Thomas Field of the South Windsor Police Service Traffic Unit has indicated that an inspection of the site found that the intersection sight distance looking north was 391 feet. He also indicated that the stopping sight distance for a vehicle traveling at 40 MPH on a downgrade of 6%would be 380 to 455 feet. We have visited this site several times and have been very uncomfortable with both the intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance at the proposed site entrance location. Without accurate traffic speed information as a basis, it is difficult to develop a recommendation for the required sight distances. It is therefore, our recommendation that the sight distances be measured with appropriate instruments with representatives of the applicant, Town Staff and Police Services and a traffic speed study be completed to determine the design speed to be utilized in our evaluation. ' Marcia A. Banach Cutler Ridge July 23, 1997 Page 2. It is also recommended that because of the terrain of Avery Street that the ConnDOT Guidelines for desirable be the minimum acceptable. It is our opinion that the proposed intersection represents a safety issue and would recommend that if a viable alternative for egress to this site were available and safer, that the Commission looks at evaluating this alternative. 2. The applicant proposed to place an island in Chandler Drive at the intersection of Avery Street. This would, therefore, propose a curb cut on Avery Street of about 100 feet (scaled). We understand that the island was proposed to try to solve, in part, the intersection sight line. However, the creation of the island at this location represents a safety problem as vehicles traveling from the north entering Chandler will have a tendency to enter into the exiting lane of Chandler. It is felt that the island creates more problems than it solves. Sheet #1 1. The proposed Stedman Circle roadway configuration from about station 5+00 to the end of the circle is not acceptable. The proposed profile indicates that a 7% downgrade to the end of the circle and a 10% upgrade from the end of the circle to a point matching the profile at around station 5+50. This makes the roadway impossible to plow as trucks making the turn at the end of the circle are almost stopped before trying to start up a 10% slope. Also the Public Improvement Specifications indicate that a 4% grade is the maximum allowable in a cul-de-sac. In addition the proposed cross slope creates a super elevation in the wrong direction, when turning in the circle. Also using a template for a 40-foot bus, it is noted that the bus cannot make the turn without riding over the curb. The proposed design creates a safety problem for both residents and Town maintenance vehicles during the winter. 2. Widths of pavement and all radii of pavement should be shown. 3. Town standard is for a minimum of 4 foot of cover over sanitary pipe. It was noticed that for lots 10 and 11, the cover over the laterals at the houses is less than 4 feet. This should also be checked for all of the proposed houses. 4. Any sanitary or storm lines that run under the islands will need an easement from the Association that will own the island. Those easements should be ' Marcia A. Banach Cutler Ridge July 23, 1997 Page 3. 5. The Town Right of Way shall be the curb line of the islands and shall be monumented. 6. The larger end of the island should be configured such that a 40-foot school bus and WB50 vehicle can make the turn. 7. Lot 26 will require a pull off at the street, as the grade of the driveway is greater than 10%. 8. Easement will be required over the pipe from CB4 to C135. 9. Sanitary manholes #3 and #1 have too many connections to them. 10. Sight distance for lot 22 driveway looking east is shown as 210' but is shown across lot 22 and not within the Town Right of Way. A sight distance easement must be placed, excluding anything being planted (other than grass), or erected within the easement to insure sight distance is maintained. 11. All manholes not in the pavement shall be locking watertight covers and should be so noted. 12. It is my understanding that test pits were dug. These should be located on plan and the test pit results indicated. 13. A gravel access road is required from CB #7 to FE #1. 14. Cross sections through the island on Chandler should be taken and shown. Sheet 4 1. Note 23 should indicate that cleanouts shall be placed at a spacing of 100 feet maximum. 2. A detail is required for the cleanout. Sheet 5 1. The "Typical Section Through Roadway With Island" detail is not acceptable. There is insufficient information to analyze this detail. Marcia A. Banach Cutler Ridge July 23, 1997 Page 4. 2. The Town Standard is for the Town Right of Way to be 12 feet from curb line to the ROW. This has not been maintained in this subdivision. Sheet 7 1. An additional Plot Plan is required, as the entire parcel is not shown on this sheet. 2. The Town will need a right to place snow on the private islands. This should be a minimum of 10 feet and should be shown. 3. The monuments shall be numbered and coordinates listed. 4. The entire open space should be monumented. 5. All easements should be shown with distances and bearings. 6. The stationing around the islands is confusing. They should be identified in some way to keep them separate (i.e. right, left, upper, lower, etc.). 7. Same comments as #1, 4, 5, 6, 8 for sheet #1 and #2 for Sheet 5. 8. The notes for lots 21 and 12 concerning driveways is confusing. The note for 21 should indicate "...from lot line of lot 21 & 22" or something similar. The note for lot 12 should indicate that the driveway shall be no closer than 50' from lot line of lots 12 and 13. Sheet 8 1. Profile for Welles Lane does not show water line. 2. Profiles should show proposed finish floor elevations. The present indication does not identify this. 3. Profile for Welles Lane —Town Standards require a 100'tangent from the intersection of Stedman Circle. 4. Chandler Drive — the sidewalk should extend around cul-de-sac. 5. It appears that the previous location of the Chandler Drive cul-de-sac is still shown on the plan view. 6. Monuments and iron pins should be shown. W Marcia A. Banach Cutler Ridge July 23, 1997 Page 5. 7. The 100' vertical curve at station 2+60 (Chandler Drive) should be an angle point. 8. The tangent on Chandler Drive from Avery Street should be 100' minimum. 9. All roadway centerline information should be shown on plan views. 10.All easements should be shown and identified with distance and bearings. Sheet 9 1. Same comments as Sheet 8 #2, 6, 9 & 10 and traffic analysis comments. 2. Town Standards are for a minimum 100-foot tangent between vertical curves. 3. The vertical curve for the "low side"where it meets the normal pavement section is not identified. Also the sag vertical curve around the island is not identified. A tangent is required and not identified. 4. Pavement widths and radii of all pavement must be identified. 5. The detention pond and the outlet structures should be shown. 6. Sidewalks should be shown. Sheet 10 1. Profiles should be labeled. 2. All easements should be identified with distances and bearings. 3. Plan should identify pipes. 4. Profile should identify proposed grades. The Engineering Department is requesting that the July 23, 1997 public hearing remain open until additional traffic information has been received and Stedman Circle redesigned. JCl/jsv i To :Marcia Banach Director of Planning July 22,1997 From:Karl Reichle Tree Warden Re:Cutler Ridge Subdivision Trees My suggestions as for Tree species would be Chanticleer or Cleveland Select instead of Bradford Pear Patmore instead of Summit Ash Keithsform Norwegian Sunset Shantung Maple instead of Red Sunset Any questions please call me at 218 Thanks Karl S ) } 4 15 J £ 7 .Y F y3ayY4 i S S f Mr. Mrs. Joseph Druzolowski 859 Avery Street South Windsor, Ct. 06074 Russel Levack, Chair f ` n JI { lanning and Zoning Commission D { 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor Ct. 06074 ;£ ?�.. - AUG 1 1 t99 _ Windsor W Property to be developed on 860 Avery Street Plannin &South r' g g Commission ear Mr. Levack: s 4%.. We are re uestin �ttllat-this letter be read out loud at the Au ust Plannin and - tag fi.,� in tl�eetin scheduled or Au ust 12 1997 at T.•30 P.m and laced on record Unfortunately, we are out of town this week and are unable to attend this xtremely important meeting•relative to the proposed developmnen on'the property directly across from our address, 859 Avery Street. 3 Through a discussion with the Planning and Zoning Office, as well as an amnatmon of the pro osed.development plans, the following issues must be heard and tT � 1dressed fo l td safety of my family, as well as for the safety of the town: 1 `_1 We rhave re ed at 859 Avery Street since 1979. We have 18 years of traffic xp6ni - es of fhim 'site' ur driveway is directly across from the proposed driveway for he development on 860 Avery Street. We concur with the police reports, there have been to-9 many accidents-ob that blind hill during our tenure at this address. By placing an nfrancefe.' the pr perty anywhere`but above'the hill entrance, you are jeopardizing e safes of everyone who drives down Avery Street. y dauhter's school bus stops in front of the proposed address entrance and r ; eeg ailed tv see ttsF Car4flahg its lights until it--'was too late. >� e sc� ea .o : o'mt ove inti t re"l us-11du been stopped a f&` minutes. he driver could not stogy mn tune to address the school bus flashers. They could not see ID ' he bus enouli time t,sto - "Due to the raffic ®rig otheedevelop'ments, as well as the mall traffic, we now have to have someone stand at the top of the hill, above both driveways, in order to safely fla$us out® iur driveway. This is no difference on_the other side'of the str6et. There is �t _ i<, LAWa sign, which we had posted when we moved in our address 18 years ago, which indicates A`Blind Drive" ahead. It doesn't seem to make a difference in the speed of cars. 3. The speed of traffic on this road is another variable which plays into the ability Hof cars to see traffic pulling out onto the road. Cars average about 45-50 miles per hour x 'on his stretch. Traffic-reports can substantiate this claim as well. Even with the school ebelow, cars do not follow the peed limits. On good days, cars can not stop quickly to ., 'oncoming traffic, nor can they. see them sufficiently. :On bad days, rain or snow, my husband`and I continually pull people out of ditches,woods and accidents. The accident :'reports do not lie, thisis a dangerous area. 4. Countless animals and pets have been killed at this spot. Cats, raccoons, dogs, skunks;possum, and uirr re,weekly found on the hill's blind pot. I am waiting for a •child or adult to be nt. - • f P 5. We have a well in front of our house, as do our neighbors. If there is any blasting to remove the bump in the hill,they must be sure they do not disturb our well or contaminate it. This is our only water supply. Has any testing been done to determine the type.of round in the area, i.e.,_bedrock. As you well know, this fact would make a i h J V i 1 Q. greet:deal of difference when blasting around water sources jt Lights coming out of the 4r yeway will shine directly.intp our house and invade all of our privacy. Some sort of barrier-must.be addressed. This,-however, is a secondary concern to the safety issues. .;There is no reason wh�,.other than perhaps getting more'houses on the land,to not - 1cr I1r J f a._ Caa� `.? have the de eflo�nN ent etrance above the proposed site and beyond the blind spot., _r :1 'pi e 7,li a i t a,� o-Ali y _ -If. . the ow allows th�c evelo er to enter Exit Avery Street; they are setting themselves up not INFO- & unto d accidents on the Coun.le5 .aIfi andz �n = , There are many o�ptxons. , ov the entrance to a safer location, regrade the hill(if kU22kS QNUO U c3nCl'SAU�i are V1 ��t V L_I�l ti Xou ou�cont natmg or disturbing several wells), or place three way stop signs t on"t hill's 1 ii e you to carefully reconsider this proposal and reread the o a�grh rg y Y P P police repo ., I do not want,m family,_ r my children or an children in town whget�on a busy;to be placedLin furtbereopardy by_`yirtue of this silly proposal. MTrliankou_for your attention o this matter. _ bI /Sincerely, n Anne and Joe Druzolowski vcr I ssu a. 859 Avery Street r =zG�^the Gwelop.:nent:entrance abo 'ti, he .�Arei llcw yne di velooc. -or v 1tols� �cc; .--,ts on tl b, T re a r many QptzQnn� , yQu ban ti�,.tll©.3ti contur;titating Or��llsttlCU _. TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: August 12, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have met with the applicant, his engineer, attorney Gerald Brady, Sgt. Thomas Field, and Mr. Frank Castro of the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 31, 1997 on Avery Street at the proposed intersection of Chandler Drive. Intersection sight distance to the north was measured and the stopping sight distance for a vehicle traveling south was visually observed and noted that a problem existed. Mr. Alford indicated that they had a preliminary profile of Avery Street in that area and that they need to take more elevation readings to evaluate the profile and what, if anything, would be required. On August 7, 1997 Mr. Alford and Mr. Hillson met with me to discuss the stopping sight distance. After much discussion it was agreed that if Avery Street from station 7&25 to station 8+50 were lowered, the stopping sight distance would be improved. It was indicated that the drawings would be revised to reflect this. i Also discussed at this meeting, was the need for the island on Chandler Drive. It is the Engineering Department and Police Services opinion that the island should not be placed in Chandler Drive at the intersection of Avery Street. We understand the reasons for the island and feel that the safety concerns outweigh the traffic engineering concerns. JCl/jsv TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: August 12, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION The following comments are in addition to our July 23, 1997 memorandum concerning the proposed Cutler Ridge Subdivision: 1. The applicant has indicated that grading of the existing shoulder areas along Avery Street will be done to improve sight distance, however, this is not shown or indicated on the drawings. 2. Avery Street should be widened the length of the subdivision property such that the width of pavement from the centerline of the pavement will be fifteen feet. JCl/jsv t VOW Engineering Solutions,P.C. 193 Lexington Road Glastonbury, CT 06033 August 12, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders Inc 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob At the July23, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting there were.several. issues that-remained unresolved relating to:the sight distances available to drivers entering' and leaving the proposed`site access road. Subsequent to, he Commission meetings we met with Town:Staffin the field and at the South Windsor Town Hall, and,obtained additional field data relating1.to the.roadway profile and prevailing speeds for Avery Street. Traffic Engineering Solutions is pleased,to submit the findings of thrs additional work. i We previously,identified the following criteria under which the light distance study was performed: "It is m ortant to provide adequate sight distance for drivers making:the left,turn.from.Avery Street onto the access`road and for;drivers approaching.frorri the opposite direction along Avery Street:` The'sght distance allows'the driver making.the left turn to decide if there is time to initiate_and complete the:turn before a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction would present a''sk: for vehicles,approaching fronit eqppdsite direction, the sight:distance should be adequate to allow,them td-;. :proceed aftheir current speed'without endangering themselves or passengers in the turning vehicle, and if.necessary;provide them with the time to'recognize the"need to stop; react to that deed,and stop before encountering the problem. It is also important to provide-.adequate sight distance for vehicles turning left or right from the site onto Avery Street to assure that they are able to safely enter the flow of traffic. Data-Collection Additional data:was collected to better identify the:travel speeds along Avery Street-and to.measure the..sight distance available for vehicles that will turn onto and from the site access road. The speed study,which was conducted over a 48-hour period from noon,on July 29 to•noon on July 31; identified the85th percentile speed along-both Avery Street`approaches to the site access road. The 85th percentile speed is.determined from field observations and is the speed at which 85 percent of all drivers travel at or less than. It is also the speed.used to analyze intersection sight distances and stopping sight distances for existing roadways. These speeds were found to be 36 miles per hour(mph)for vehicles traveling northbound and 37 mph for the southbound approach. Field:,observations,were made by Town Staff on July 31.to identify the distance drivers will be able to see when looking north(to the right) from the site access road.. The c:\busines"sNxmarui\1[tVA2.doc distance was found.to be 509 feet. The sight distance looking left from the site access road was not in question and issreater than 600 feet Additional profile information for Avery Street was obtained through field survey by Alford Associates. Using the new profile information,sight lines were plotted for several points.along Avery.Street"from.which drivers might initiate,tl a left turn ontothe site access road: Table 1 presents a summary of the sight distances. Referral to the site plan will provide a visual understanding of the locations.from which the sight distances were measured.; The northerly edge of the access road will,be located at approximately Station 6+83. The center-o€the entrance lane will be located at Station 7+03 with no island in.the access road and at Station 7+25,with a"center island in the access road: .-Sight distance profiles were plotted€rom Stations 6+8Q(at-the sanitary ,anhol in Avery Street), 6+70(ten feet north-ofthe manhole),6+60,and 6+50 (further north than would be feasible to initiate the left turn onto the site). `The profiles were plotted for existing;:' conditions and with-modifications to the"Avery Street profile to remove a small hump between.stations 7+25 and.8+50. . Table 1 ':Sight Distance Summary - Station Sight Distance for._ . Sight Distance with Existing Conditions Revised Road Profile ` . 64 80 355 Feet 426-Feet 6.+ 70 314 Feet . 368:Feet 6 +60 303 Feet 342 Feet 6 + 50 289,Feet- 320.Feet :Further review of the Avery. Street profile indicates that_the sight distance from Station6+90;s continuous-to the bottom of the hill on Avery Street. The information in Table 1':xndicates the sight distance.increases the further youth a driver initiates the'lefi turn until,Station 6+90 where the sight distance be continuous to the bottom of the hill Summary.of Findings During a meeting,with Town Staff ari August 7, 1997 we reviewed the additional information as it relates to the.sight distance requirements presented in:the 1990 Guidelines for Kghway Design prepared by the Connecticut DOT We found that the desirable intersection sight distance looking left and right from the sight,access road`is:505 feet for 40 mph design speed,(3 to mph greater,than the observed 85th percentile speed on Avery Street). The available sight.distances, 505 feet looking to the,right and more than 600 feet looking to the left,exceed-the desirable distance presented in.the DOT Guidelines. The sight distance needed to turn left from southbound Avery Street onto the site access road was determined from the same DOT reference and found to be from 245` feet(at the lower minimum- end)to 295"feet(at the upper end): This distance had previously been calculated by.Traffic Engineering Solutions to be 280 feet. The sight line profiles_summarized in Table i indicate that the"minimum sight distance available from any of the points evaluated was 289 feet or just less than the 205 feet indicated as the upper c:Uwsinem\MmmaHn\It"ra.doc end by ConnDOT's Guidelines. Town Staff has requested that the sight distance be improved,by adjusting the roadway grade on Avery Street from Station 7+25 to 8+50 to provide the added sight distance shown in Table 1. Conclusion The sight distance available.for drivers'initiating the left turn onto the site access road and for vehicles approaching from the south will approach(289 vs..,295 feet) or exceed the upper_limit of sight distances determined from the Connecticut 1990 Guidelines from each of the points evaluated along Avery Street without improvements to Avery Street. With improvements to Avery,Street,the sight distance from.all the points ' evaluated will exceed the upper limit determined by the ConnDOT Guidelines. We (`( recommend constructing the center island on the site access road to move drivers further k south before initiating the left turn onto the site;thus, providing the maximum possible sight distance for these drivers and those approaching from the opposite direction. The sight distanceslooking in both-directions from the access road will exceed the desirable intersection sight distance for speeds of:40.mph,which is 3 to 4 mph"greater than the 85th j percentile speeds-observed on Avery Street. t I The.sight distances available-to drivers entering and Jeaving,the site will be greater- than the'desirable and upper end of the sight distances presented in the 1990 Connecticut DOT Guidelines for Highway Design, These sight distances will allow access or drivers entering and leaving the subdivision for the'prevailing_speeds"that drivers travel on Avery Street' - Smcerely, , TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS;P.C. Bruce A. Hillson, P.E. cAbusuiessWannarinll VrL2.doc i Location : Avery St 150' North of Site Accurate Counts City/State: South Windsor, CT 508-664-2565 Site Code : 000023400001 Couater : 12 860-282-0223 Start Date: 07/29/97 JANUS File: TES23401 File I.D. TES23401 Southbound Page 3 Begin 1- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 50th 85th Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 999 Totl Pct. Pct. i 12:00 07/31 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 37 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 36 43 02:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 36 € 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 33 46 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 9 33 43 j 05:00 0 0 0 3 5 7 17 6 2 0 0 0 0 40 35 40 06:00 0 0 0 0 13 57 70 16 5 1 0 0 0 162 35 38 07:00 0 0 0 5 33 121 102 24 4 1 0 0 0 290 33 37 08:00 0 0 1 11 26 58 55 18 9 0 0 0 0 178 33 38 09:00 5 0 0 7 34 48 42 13 3 0 0 0 0 152 32 37 10:00 0 2 1 8 34 48 48 11 3 0 0 0 0 155 32 37 11:00 0 1 0 12 36 57 36 6 0 0 0 0 0 148 31 36 Totals 10 14 24 183 776 1760 1559 383 104 15 2 2 0 4832 Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 27 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 32 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 33 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 42 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 30-39 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 3319 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 68.82% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 4 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .08% i f Location : Avery St 240' South of Site Accurate Counts City/State: South Windsor, CT 508-664-2565 Site Code : 23400002 Couv:ter : 9 860-282-0223 Start Date: 07/29/97 S JANUS File: TES23402 File I.D. TES23402 Northbound Page 3 t Begin 1- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 50th 85th Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 999 Totl Pct. Pct. 12:00 07/31 0 0 0 1 10 6 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 30 37 01:00 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 30 33 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 36 38 03:00 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 31 33 04:00 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 33 05:00 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 32 06:00 0 0 0 7 5 15 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 34 30 36 07:00 0 0 2 4 17 22 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 61 30 36 08:00 0 0 0 3 24 22 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 64 30 36 09:00 1 2 2 15 22 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 27 32 10:00 0 0 0 15 40 38 16 4 1 0 0 0 0 114 29 35 11:00 0 0 0 4 34 38 34 5 1 0 0 0 0 116 31 37 Totals 1 5 32 292 1213 1959 1033 139 22 3 1 0 0 4700 Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 25 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 31 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 31 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 38 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 25-34 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 3172 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.49$ Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 1 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .02% I 0 � I D TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee DATE: August 12, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have received revised drawings number 2, 8, 9, 10 and 11A dated 8-11-96 for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision. These were revised to address the issues of stopping sight distance (sheet 11A) and the island portion of Stedman Circle and Welles Lane. Our review of drawings 2, 8, 9 & 10 indicates that there is still a concern as to the design of the Island Areas. It is our opinion that these can be worked out once another meeting is arranged with the engineer. The Public Improvement Specifications are currently being revised and meetings have taken place with the Committee since January 1997. Within the next month these will be presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission for inclusion into the Subdivision Regulations. We ask that if this application were approved, that an approval condition would be that the new typical pavement cross section must be implemented in this subdivision. JCl/jsv DepartmentPlanning Town of • • • Memo To: Chief Gary Tyler,Traffic__Authority From: Michele R. Lipe,AICP M.-I CC: Sergeant Thomas Fields Date: 08/20/97 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision Approval At the Planning and Zoning meeting of August 12, 1997, the Commission approved the above referenced subdivision with the new road intersecting with Avery Street. As a part of that approval, the Commission required the developer to install stop signs to create a three-way intersection of the new road and Avery Street. The approval condition (#27 on the attached letter) made the placement of these stop signs subject to the approval of the Traffic Authority. Their primary reason for requiring these signs s for speed control. Could you please advise us of the Police Services position on the placement of stop signs on Avery Street. If this is not something that the Police Services is willing to require, the Planning and Zoning Commission has requested that you (or someone from your office)attend their meeting to discuss the issue. The Planning and Zoning Commission also requested that we investigate with the Traffic Authority the possibility of turning on the blinking light currently installed on Avery Street. (It was used in the past associated with a home day care facility.) They feel that this caution signal will provide a warning for vehicles going north on Avery Street that cars may be entering the or exiting the new subdivision. We would like to resolve these issues as quickly as possible. If you would like to attend a PZC meeting, please contact either Marcia or me and we will put this item on an upcoming agenda for discussion. As always,your assistance is appreciated. •Page 1 i AWN SEq x_ �, '4A (n 4 i Ta� aie SoaM ? , O G U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 S CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 OR• August 20, 1997 CERTIFIED MAIL Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl 4`97-41 P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning 8v Zoning Commission voted on August 12, 1997 to approve with modifications appl #97-41 P, Open Space Subdivision to create 26 lots to be known as "Cutler Ridge" on property containing 35+ acres located on the easterly side of Avery Street and northerly of Pine Knob Drive, RR zone as shown on plans prepared by Alford Associates and revised through June 24, 1997. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for 26 lots, number 1 - 26. 2. Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on one side of all new streets. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. All lots shall be served by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by public water. 6. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Chief of Police. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police. 7. Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. 8. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 9. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$10,000. 10. Prior to commencement of any site work, a preconstruction meeting must be held with Town Staff. 11. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 12. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 13. Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" = 40', shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. 14. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed, the Town Engineering shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 15. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer (on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. 16. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$1300.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 17. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 2 r a t � 18. Note must be added to the plans addressing the 90 x 90 buildable square requirement. 19. A 15' conservation easement is required along the rear of the lots abutting up to the rear of the properties on Pine Knob Drive to ensure that the stone walls and tree line are not disturbed. 20. The specific species of street trees should be coordinated with the Tree Warden. 21. The Connecticut Water Company concerns must be incorporated: a. Underground storage tanks should be prohibited on this site. This should be noted on the plans and included in the deeds to the individual lots. b. The detention basin and other associated stormwater structures must be regularly maintained during and after construction activities. c. The prospective home owners of lots #13 and #15 should be made aware that their properties abut a public water supply well property and that the storage/disposal of noxious materials on the back of their property should be prohibited. All prospective homeowners within this subdivision should be aware that the dumping of any material/chemicals onto the ground or into the storm drainage system is prohibited. 22. Engineering comments of July 23, 1997 and August 12, 1997 must be addressed to the Town Engineer's satisfaction with the exception of the elimination of the island located at the entrance to the site. 23. The open space will be not Town owned. A ownership of the open space should be identified on the plans. 24. A landscaping bond in the amount of$2,000 must be submitted. 25. Avery Street must be widened the length of the subdivision property such that the width of the pavement from the centerline of the pavement will be 15 feet. 26. Proposed grading to achieve sight lines along the existing shoulder of Avery Street must be shown on the plans. Three-way stop signs are required at the intersection of the new road and Avery Street. The placement of these signs is subject to the approval of the Traffic Authority. 28. Trees should be flagged in the field prior to cutting and are subject to Town Staff approval. Black and white transparent mylars of the plot plan of the entire site with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letter of � r approval of this Commission, Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, as well as WPCA must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the office of the Town Clerk by November 29, 1997. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Russell G. Levack Chairman RGL/pmm Enclosures Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Alford Associates MEMORANDUM September 10, 1997 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION (t We have reviewed the""Final Plans"dated 9-2-97 for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision and have the following comments: 1. Revised drainage calculations must be submitted for gutter flow analysis and storm sewer design reflecting the new catch basin numbering. Also, CB8 and CB6 (old numbering CB7 and CB5) seem to have the same problem identified in my July 23, 1997 memorandum. 2. An easement is required for storm pipe from CB10 to CB15. 3. Avery Street should have stationing shown on plans to coordinate with the profile shown on sheet 11A. 4. The proposed grading easement on lots 3 and 26 doesn't seem sufficient. This should be increased. 5. Sheet 5 — Pavement detail should indicate that the top course of pavement for Chandler Drive should be 1-1/2" not 2". 6. The proposed street line on Avery Street should be monumented. 7. The proposed utility and snow easement over the islands should indicate to whom the easement is to be granted. Also, if laterals from the lots are under the islands, the Association needs to grant easements to the lot owners. Also, utilities should be identified, i.e., storm sewer, sanitary sewers, etc. 8. Sheet 7B —The note about monuments set off the curb line should indicate that the curb line is the street right-of-way line. 9. Drawings must indicate that all manholes not in the pavement shall have locking watertight covers. 10. Cross sections of the island on Chandler should be taken and shown. 11. Note 23 on sheet 4 should indicate that the spacing of cleanouts is a maximum of 100 feet. 12. Sidewalk on Chandler Drive should extend around cul-de-sac. 13. The As-built plan and profile sheets shall have monuments numbered and their coordinates listed. 14. A detail for widening of Avery Street should be shown. Also, detail of flared end should be shown. 15. A WB-50 vehicle will not be able to travel around the islands on Stedman Circle and Welles Lane without riding over the curbs. Two options exists—redesign the islands so that these vehicles do not ride over the curbs or place concrete curbs (backed up by 3 feet of pavement) around the "bulb"ends of the island. ,SOW N Sf4 c U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Osoe•co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 11, 1997 Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Cutler Ridge Avery Street SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Dear Mr. Mannarino: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority, at its regular meeting of September 2, 1997, gave approval for the connection to the Town's sewerage system of a 26-lot residential subdivision at the easterly side of Avery Street, as more specifically shown on plans entitled "Cutler Ridge - Open Space Subdivision - RR Zone - Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc. - 860 Avery Street, South Windsor, CT" by Alford Associates, Inc., Windsor, CT, Drawings No. 2 of 11, labeled "Topographic Map and Conservation Plan," dated June 3, 1997, revised 7-11-97, 8-1- 97, and 8-11-97; No. 9 of 11, labeled "Plan/Profile," dated June 3, 1997, revised 6-24- 97, 7-11-97, 8-1-97, and 8-11-97; and No. 10 of 11, labeled "Plan/Profile," dated June 24, 1997, revised 7-11-97 and 8-11-97, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Technical approval of the Town Engineering Department. 2. Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff, and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority, and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. 3. An agreement between the developer, Mannarino Builders, Inc., and Town of South Windsor engineering staff that two manholes, #7 and #1, and the pipes entering the manholes are satisfactorily located for proper function of the system. If this agreement cannot be made, the developer agrees to add two manholes at a reasonable distance to reduce the number of connections per manhole. Mr. Robert Mannarino -2- September 11, 1997 4. Properties requiring pumping systems will have minimum 250-gallon holding tanks and electrical connections to provide auxiliary power if required. 5. The easement ending on Avery Street has a tree close to, or on, the easement right-of-way; it is understood that the Town shall have the right to remove the tree in the event that it interferes with Town access to the right-of-way. 6. Cleanouts must be provided. 7. This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, r Joseh J.7Carino, Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority JJC:rt cc: Matthew Galligan, Town Manager Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer / Marcia Banach, Director of Planning ✓ John Collins, Chief Building Inspector ONN Se r n 4ale SI� ?Mnd44'Ot O C V-1 m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 pR,CpC� AREA CODE 860/644-251 1 September 11, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted at its September 9, 1997 meeting to approve the removal of modification #27 in the approval letter dated August 20, 1997. I.f you have any questions, feel free to call the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING CO r ISSION — Russell G. Levack, Chairman RGL/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer ,SOW N SE9 o u m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ��tiOsox•co�r AREA CODE 860/644-251 1 September 16, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road _ South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Preconstruction Meeting —Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Open Space Subdivision IN ATTENDANCE Tracy LaPiene Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 257 Jeff Folger Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 229 Rich Shelonsky Simscroft-Echo Farms 2 Farms Village Rd 550-3676 P 0 Box 581 Simsbury, CT 06070-0581 Kevin J. Kelly Simscroft-Echo Farms 658-3676 Mel Stead Street Services, TOSW 644-2531 Jim Martucci Simscroft-Echo Farms 658-3671 Ken Lane SNET 725-4295 Michele R. Lipe Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 252 Jerry Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 644-2511 x 245 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting. Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work or if any problems/concerns arise during construction. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected (ringed with haybales or equal). 0 3. During construction of the road/driveway a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel onto water is to be used for dust control as required. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Public Works Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist requested for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work c. Preparation of subgrade ' compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six-inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, 2 inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures, pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks' notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary) of the infrastructure, prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers located as per revised as-built checklist. 9. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 10. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Rich Shelonski (beeper #802-4102) and Rob Mannarino (beeper #220-0033) in the field. 11. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 12 Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town every other Friday at 1:00 p.m.. 13. Forty-eight (48) hours' notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. 14. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 15. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 16. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m., no work on Sunday. 17. Developer contact the Tree Warden re; street trees to be planted in the street tree easement. 18. Avery Street reconstruction must be completed prior to any Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 19. Street cut and Drain layers permits are required. Planning_Department 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. Landscape bond of $2,000 is required. 2. Liability policy must be submitted. 3. Conservation Easement/Drainage Easements to be completed. 4. Trees should be flagged in the field and are subject to approval from Town Staff. SNET NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utility connection. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting (if required) to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property, which abuts a public highway, must be numbered. Such number(s) (address) shall be visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 thru 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings, which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure, are excluded. Demolition permit is required for the removal of existing structures. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building Department 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Very truly yours, J pf�W Michele R. Lip e AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/pmm cc: Sgt. Field, SWPS Karl Reichle, Public Works Mel Stead, Public Works Tom Ludwig, CL&P Minh V. Le, SNET John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control SOWN S`c4 • 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R-c�`r AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 19, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision This is to advise you that the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission voted at its September 17, 1997 meeting to approve the revision of earth moving activities of application #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision which was previously approved July 16, 1997. That a sequential cut and fill plan based upon lot numbers be initiated. The sequencing plan, subject to staff approval, must be put in writing and included on a revised plan. If you have any questions feel free to call 644-2511, ext. 229. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION CO,M�MISSION Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairman EAW/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Planning & Zoning Commission TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR'. STAFF SITE CHANGE F' ;FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION a. GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSO °'"Phone No.. Address Er L.l l�UisLltJ Say►"a4... S i t e Name P&,Z No A l M Owner YA PtAJ )Aki AJO suikaes Phone No 440, �Fh-Zoa s contractor i►MSC�r -t`-�CChhti f AfrA S Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design Engr. f I Dater __ CHANGE:. (Describe location and nature of chap e. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) VV'J �Nc 4S ea sot for Change: (Why is change required) a v APPROVALS: (As Require ) Dir. . Of Planning Datez Town Engineer +Date: Dir. of Public Wok Date.: Other:_: Date:. STAFF COMMENTS: . �►- ~ I. White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant r Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department 5 ` TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR F STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & ;SUBDIVISION b. { GENERAL CHANGE ORDER CONTACT. PERSON6 °� t�CJ Phone 'No. r� Address" ILI Arc �k 0 AIN .` Site Name Owner N fJ j \+V& W lcR��f f i-AIC: Phone No -"�'ty Contractor ,SjAA 4 0rT fC Signature of Owner Date;: Signature of Design En r Date*. CHANGES (Describe location and nature'. of hang Include Four 'W copies of ,.plan/profile 'of. Change ) r �L1M/�+}� Cs�/•yc�tf!"f � �tsr�1�.S" � �,��1Jf, t�r�� �' Reason for Change: (Why ;is change. required) APPROVALS: As Re fired) , D. r. Of._Planning ; Date: r :/ Town r Engineer Datea Dr. of Public W ks )ate': Other: Datez " STAFF COMMENTS.z; White - Town Engineer Yellow = Applicant . Punk Director of Planning Goldenrod - .Engineering Department N�rss I. ALL �EQVNzt 75 Fv2 A CuL-�E-Sr4C AS slow /N «TALE I Pu,3uc iZoa�wv.vs _DES1UN ST.°vv aa�2DS" 5 APPLY 7-0 94' - THE F30uLEVAZ(7 SCt CVR Cg uL-De-SAc w,7.+4 DETAIL eXC't-' noN 70 77405-6 DErAILs S�towA O,Q 77+1 s s Ear. 2' Tc- r ►ova --4AL4 gE ow."c� AYOC� / l3 MA4/&v7gHNr-D 8Y 77te A:Ssoc1A77o,u.7-4 s / �v 70WAi's Qlbl+T O,r-lUAY S//Azz 13E ti MIn) T 4-- Gu2r3 L/NF DC- 77&—Lsc.4n�D, A R41-p-r ro i=4A,=-- s vow eta+ ��D S c WAU.s F,�hnrrt�A -� 7 F- RDtrJ. 3, lvlo�uiu��rs Foe ,poet/ �2oU•vD Sscrb�D . SF4ALu 8E AT — — — — INTO 7W- 1'6[/+7v7�. — — — — 4. SiDELcr oGrs s//A{� /nrs"� , As Pc'� $UF,jyl�viS�o� �QE6ucA�ex�s� Lae�4TEn A s DE'7=7.vEp f3Y 77,,1E Pc,+,ll,vlv4r d-FO.u/-l4 Cp�ry�tq t SS/O� Z2� � u 3-d MIAJ Mr/v M►N Z"017 2E'ur �G do O O GO v d to o d d d D 0 0 0 C v o e ST�^uC D uGbUUe— U O U a'ejuPsF3Ic�C N.T:S. BOULEVARD CUL-de-SAC ROAD November 17, 1997 Mannarino Builders, Inc. Mr. Robert Mannarino 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: PAVING AFTER OCTOBER 15, 1997 Please be advised that this Department is in receipt of your request to pave after October 15tn at Cutler Ridge. Paving will be permitted only if the following conditions are met. 1. Weather conditions must be favorable — no paving in adverse weather. Temperature must be 400 F or warmer at start of paving. 2. Base surface of road/driveway must be 400 F or warmer. NO paving if there is frozen ground, snow/wet base conditions. 3. Owner must notify Town Engineering Division 24 hours in advance of anticipated paving date. 4. NO paving is to begin until Town has inspected site the day of paving. 5. Paving operation to follow DOT Form 814A specifications. Should you fail to follow the conditions noted above, we may not accept/approve the improvements to your project. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, Michael J.Gantick, P.E. Director of Public Works MJG/jsv cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Street Services Scott C. Lappen, Street Service Specialist Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Engr/Misc arsp/paving i M 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: November 24, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the bond estimate for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision and recommend that it be set at $1,223,000.00 Attached is a copy of the bond estimate for your records. JCl/jsv Attachment TOWN OF SOUTH WINDS t ,PROJECT: ev% �12 3 STREET: okV2 z % BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: `ENGINEER: A-L rt'b A S�' t,G 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS 4,Oco 2. StriQ&Stockpile_ Top§oil CYI d a SI, 2.00 a1.Q'l l 3. Earth Excavation (Excluding Roadway Trench) CY 3 6 10.00 11 3 4. RoAdway Excavation CY SO\ 12 64144. 5. Earth Trench Ex -4 Y 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 31(.tL 12.00 31044 7 Earth Trench Exc. -1 0 15.00 1 a 4, 3 SD 8_ Earth Trench Exc. -2 Sb 18.00 1 160 9. RoadwjX Ex (Rock) ' 50.00 10. Rock Trench Ex -4 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 Cy 75.00 12. Rock Trench Ex 0-15 100.00 13. Rock Trench Ex -20 150.00 i 14. F rmati n "it 01 1.50 l o (-3 15. Subbase'Gravel cy 1 4 (o 2 3 oZ o 16. Processed Ag=gate TONS 01386 18,00 +a 530 17. Common Borrow 18. Gravel Borrow 19. " Bit. Concrete 4410 I TONS ' 50.00 20. " Bit. Concrete 1 3 3 G too (Claw 1i) TONS *varies 514- ?/ Page 1 Sub-Total f Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction 'Irt m Descrj2tion Unittit Price No. I No. 2 21 " As Li in F ¢SS-0 i 3 t—ro 22. Road widening m 1 (0D 23, Cone Sidewalk4' Wide LF l) 30.00tlD ORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM CMPONENTS 24. 6 " RCP Class IV In PIwe LF 130.00 25. " RCP Class IV In Place LF 100.00 26, 4 P Class rV In Place LIP 75.00 27 42" RCP Class TV In Place 28. LE" RCP Class IV In Place LF 60.00 29 0" RCP Class IV In Place F — 50.00 30, 24" RCP Class IV In Place LF _ 42.00 1 1 " RCP Class TV In Place F 35.00 2. 1 " RCP Class TV In PI 33. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. " -N-12 or FMal 21.00 I 36, 2" ADS-N-12 or goal 24.00 so �Jr ? 1 "AD N-1 v� 25.50 /Z 38. 1 " AD N- UNDERDRAINS Cause -bojH µS wr+h N 0-OL IN i 9 " PVC SDR 35 Tn Place _LF :J(-q 15.00 '7 00 40. 80 PVC DR 35 In RIPRAP 41 Modified RiWg CY 4` 00 Page 2. Sub-Total$ 010 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Ouantitv Ptice cost No. 1 No. 2 42 Ri 45.00 43. StandardRim 45.00 DRAINA E STRUCftqZFZ 44. T Basin EA ��/ 1500.00 oY — 45. T " Double rate EA 2000.0 4 Gw 46. T Basin EA 1500.00 47. Manhole3 Ueu — 48. Manhole w/DroR Inlet EA 2500.00 49. Manhole ver Ten Feet EA 2000.00 Headwall50, 51, Endwall EA 2 x Culven x LF 53, 1 " Flared3 450.00 54, N Flared End EA 500.00 55, 24" Flared YJ End EA E A 550.00 56. " Flared d EA •f1 7 anr�dvi� t; - ! v. a.f�o 58, 10' Wide 9. ChmvelA Road tyl15.00 0. Reset M H B SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 1 12" PVC 2 M �j( 63, " PVCSDR -X -/� 64 " R g t» *varies I Z3 t 810 Page 3. > Sub-Total S CAJ • E BOND cSTZMATE Bond Bond . Unit .:eduction Reduction ' item Descri2tion Unit Ouantitv Price No. 1 N . 2 i_ SANITARY SEWER STRUCK 65, snit Man—hole EA 1 4- 66 Sanitary Manhole WfDro2 Inlet EA 2500.0 67 Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 2000.00Id 68, 69, SMU 4s &MISC. rrEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF 71, Fence 72, Guide Rail LF s 73 End Anchorage EA * 74. Guide Post EA 100.00 7 v r] W 76, Street Sigal FA 1 75.00 77 Traffic i °, 75.00 / — 7RA 4- im,go 4-oou 79. Furnishing �50 /Pl2.50 80 Fertilizing. Seediniz /G /62.50 ¢O aq u —and M-ulchinr Sy 82 Maintenance/Protection * varies Page 4. Sub-Total$ O I J 53 b . C2 J � I BOND ESTIMATE FORM { t Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction item Unit Quantity Price 1 No. 2 • -B it * a- 9�0 EA 4 100.00 4&00 I Concrete86. Monuments EA 250.00 71010001 7 'Driveway-Bit, Conc. SY $�' 20.00 3t and 89. 90. L Sub-Total S a u0 w Sub-Total Page 1 S Sub-Total Page 2 ZD . 06 Sub-Total Page 3 e/ ' CAO Sub-Total Page 4 Sin o -c%, ' � �ZC0.00 Sub-Total Page 5 S g7g 02l Sub-Total S 244,So 25°10 Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 1, z7.z,sz(o TOTALS * varies Page 5. 1vsUez/B0NDESMRM0omr95 November 26, 1997 Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Rob: RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION Confirming our conversation of November 25, 1997 concerning paving of the roads in Cutler Ridge Subdivision: 1. You indicated you would be paving Saturday, November 29, 1997 to allow the roads to dry out. 2. Paving is to be limited from Station 0+00 to Station 4+75 on Stedman Circle and from Station 0+00 to Station 4+00 on Chandler Drive and Welles Lane. 3. All compaction and proctor test results for subgrade, subbase, base materials are to be received and reviewed by Wednesday November 26, 1997. 4. Engineering personnel will mark out the spots we have a concern about on Wednesday November 26, 1997 and those are to be cut out and filled and tested. 5. On Saturday, November 29, 1997 the conditions of the road will be reinspected. 6. No traffic will be allowed over the road to be paved from Wednesday to Saturday. 7. Paving is to be 1 1/2"compacted thickness of bituminous concrete for the base pavement on all roads. 8. To pave, conditions on Saturday shall be: a. No wet base material. b. Temperature of air 400 and rising. c. Temperature of ground to be 400 or warmer. d. No frost. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders RE: Cutler Ridge Subdivision November 26, 1997 Page 2. 9. Inspections and testing will be done in the spring/summer of 1998 as necessary to insure the integrity of the work. In the event that testing demonstrates that Town road specifications are not met, then the road will require corrective measures satisfactory to the Town. 10. If you decide to pave and the conditions above are not met, observation of paving operations by Town Staff will not constitute acceptance or approval of said work. 11. As we discussed, the issue of work on Avery Street will still need to be addressed. Please keep the Engineering Division appraised of your intended work schedule. Very truly yours, Michael J. Gantick, P.E. Director of Public Works MJG/jsv cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Street Services .� DEG-04-97 02 :39 AM MAMNARIN0EUIDERSINC 9606448332 P. 010 W)1"1'11 WINDSOR.C'1 06074 a . PFT.860-289-705i ` FA-X$60-299.7121 r e TOWN OF SOUTH WrNDSOR PLANNING DEPARTNZNT MIC'HELLE LIPL I W SI;T,LIVAN MTNUE SOUTH WINDSOP,CT.06074 DEAR MICHELLF, PLEASE ACCEPT TMS LETI'tR AS A FOn4AI.REQUEST FORA 90 DAY F;XTENSIOH FOR APISLL A 1*IQN tf 9 i-41P CUTLLR t?JDGF. OFF AVERY STRL'LT. e«J ,y tt F i' 'F # T_T NiANNARTNO NT "041N Sf4 o0 ?J&U/4�0t c U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co��� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 2, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on November 25, 1997 to set the site bond at $$1,223,000.00 A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the issuance of building permits. Very truly yours, PLANNING 8s ZONING COMMISSION j 9 Frank A. Castro, Chairman ' FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer I 40W N SC,( o � . U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR co��� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 3, 1997 Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION / On November 28, 1997 the paving of Welles Lane, Chandler Drive and Stedman Circle from 0+00 to 4+75± in the Cutler Ridge Subdivision occurred. This paving was done disregarding all of the Town of South Windsor requirements as spelled out in Mr. Michael Gantick's November 4, 1997 letter. The following conditions were present at 8:20 am: air temperature 330 F, soil temperature 290 to 300 F, ground frozen, water pumping up through the processed stone when walked on or driven on. On November 25, 1997 Mr. Michael Gantick, Mr. Tracy LaPiene, Mr. Joseph Perna, you and I met at Cutler Ridge to inspect the site and during that visit certain requirements were discussed and understood by all parties and were memorialized in Mr. Ganticws November 26, 1997 letter.to you. These requirements were not. met when paving was done on November 28, 1997. The Town of South Windsor had Mr. Tracy LaPiene and Mr. Joseph Perna, Project Engineers, observe the paving operation and document the conditions both via video camera and in writing. Mr. Todd Mannarino was informed that the conditions at the site did not meet the Town's requirements. The paving of the base course was not done in accordance with Town requirements; the base material (processed stone) was wet and frozen, walking on the base caused deflection in some areas and vehicles driving on the base caused deep ruts. Therefore, the Town of South Windsor finds that we cannot accept the work done (including the base, subbase and pavements), as it did not meet our standards. Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders December 3, 1997 RE: Cutler Ridge Subdivision The subdivision regulations Chapter 4, paragraph D2c indicates "No permanent certificate of occupancy will be issued unless a roadway base and binder course of bituminous concrete, constructed in accordance with these regulations, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer." Please advise as to what measures you plan on undertaking to bring these roads up to Town Standards. YeC. s, a,r JCl/jsv Attachments cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Barry Guliano, Town Attorney Melvin C. Stead, Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer LEGAL SERVICES REQUEST FORM DEPARTMENT: PZC CONTROL # Type of Review Date of Request Date Received Date Date of Review Dispatched 12/5/1997 (Check Appropriate Box) ❑ Contractual ❑ Statutory ❑ Regulatory [V] Other (Please specify) Declaration for Culter Ridge Please review the Homeowners Association Declaration, which was prepared in conjunction with the approval of Appl. #97-47P, Cutler Ridge Open Space Subdivision, for compliance with the regulations. I have enclosed copies of the sections in the Zoning Regulations and Subdivision Regulations, which indicate what is required to be in these documents. If you have any question, please call. Signature: �✓ �!J �t-f OWN sf4 O J a , -0 -Oath Vzn&ot Wn OPS s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co` AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 10, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on December 9, 1997 to grant a 90-day extension for filing subdivision plans for the above-referenced subdivision in the Town Clerk's office. The original filing deadline was November 29, 1997; the new filing deadline is February 27, 1998. State statutes authorize one additional 90-day filing extension. If you wish to request an additional extension, please request in writing prior to that date. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm 10'4 3fgC O 0' olle SOUZA c v i, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR`o��,� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 11, 1997 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re:. Appl #974r 9, Cutler Ridge Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 9, 1997 to reduce the site bond from $1,223,000 to $441,000. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: December 9, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the request for a reduction in the bond amount for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision. There are discrepancies in the requested bond reduction and our recommended bond reduction which mainly have to do with the paving not being done in accordance with Town Standards. It is recommended that the bond be reduced to $514,000.00. Attached is a copy of the adjusted bond estimate. 4Al, 00� �s 600b 9 JCl/jsv Attachment PRO.ECT: l�0 �� ,jet STREET: '7 % BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.• - �17 - 4l P alm I a 1996 CALENDAR YEARNHS F.NGINfiER: 14-1-F�-� V�Ss�+i+ � DATE: //-/"�-'9�- Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit Ouantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Grubbing 2. Strip & Stockpile Toploil CYI d a 51, 2 a.Q~l 3. Earth Excavation (Excluding,Roadway 3 6b Trench) 3 6 10.00 111 4 RoadwU ExcavationC)\3L 12 6 .41 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 31(.k 12.003'I 944 7 Earth Trench Exc. -1 0 15.00 a 3S0 8_ Earth Trench Exc. -2 Sb 18.00 11100 9. Roadway Exc. (Rock) -_ 10. Rock Trench Ex -4 CY ..— 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 75.00 12. Rock Trench Ex 0-15 CY _ 100.00 13, Rock Trench Exc. 0-20 CY — 150.00 14. Formation f SOWde SY � 1 l� vSF 15. Subbase Gravel CY4 20.00 d 3 a o 2 9/3ZD 1 a385ism4a 5so ¢2�930 17. Coffunon Borrow 18. Gravel Borrow p 34 svo 19. " Bit. Concrete (ClassI TONS 50.00 20. " Bit. Concrete(Class 11) TONS 55,00_, 3 3 *varies Page 1 Sub-Total$ 1 13ON Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction item i nit Ouantitv Price 1 No. 2 42IntermediateLy / 45.00 43, StandardRimw CY 45.00 Le, Q 5prl*V-d�D �F� c,s / cw•w p�.au DRAINA E STRUCrURES 44. T Basin EA �-�� 1500.00 45. T " Double rate EA 2000 0 4 G� 46 T Basin EA " 47 Manhole 3 UOu — 48. Manhole wMM Inlet .2500.00 49 Manhole Over Ten Feet EA 2000.00 50, Headwall 51, Endwall 2 x Culven 53, l Flamd 3 4 /3 O .w 54, "Flared End EA 500.00 55, 24"Flared End EA 550.00 56. " Flarxi E 7 - 64nN avi U4 OA- t 9^ 58, sc-A m!� ,)" a uw 10' Wide 9. GravelA Road LIPl /7/ 700 0. Reset M HC.B. SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 1 12" PVC 40.00 2 M PVC In Place S:DR 35 LF 37.00 63, " .00 64, " —t:, $ txo i * varies D 1241117 LIg/1 7j��0 riU Page 3. ' / Sub-Total S ��, �o0 12J9I9� Unit .:eduction Reduction Item Description Unit-I Quantity Price- No. 1 No. 2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65, Sanitla Manhole 3 15oom 4 66, Sanitary Manhole wfDroR Inlet EA 2500.00 67. Sanitaa ,Manhole over 10 FT EA 2000.0lit 68, 69, STgUc''i'LMO&MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF 71.Fence 72, Guide Rail , • 73, End Anchorage EA 74. Guide Post EA 100.00 75, PavemMarking '7 w 7r 76, Street ; EA 75.00 dd S-U Z�f 77 Traffic i 75.00 78, Street Lights EA Q- 1000.00 4- oou 1499 a 79. Furnishing/Placing jamil SY //` 2.50 �50 � 1419 80, Fertilizing. Seeding and Mulching Sy /G /6 2.50 82. MaintenanceMmtection f Trafffic constrmcdon Staking * varies W9 N 19 a+ Page 4. f Uwlqlg� r) Sub-Total$ r"t 1 1 i 1 Unit Reduction Reduction I(em DeEMRtigp Unit Quantity Price I No. 2 _B itLS85. Iron Pins EA 4 d, 100.00 40\00 4,Zo 6 86. t Monuments •EA 0 2 Z 010001 Zo 0 o o 7 'Driveway-Bit. Conc. $b Z//J? S L.S — — 30 ojoo 30,o 0 0 89. 7- 90. Z Sub-Total S a (A) .w. 144410 — Sub-Total Page 1 S �' Sub-Total Page 2 S / �i of o ' "e z3 sio - Do Sub-Total Page 3 S At ' CAA 34*D r � Sub-Total Page 4 S / /. - w 7 C/ ,zoo•oo Sub-Total Page 5 S 97$ ozl , o0 44r4q& 3,r2,'$ Sub-Total S 25%Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ I, ` 7-Z/92!o TOTALS '� ^ �0,G�Z *' S�y �, zz 3,oaD /� SA�y , logo * varies Page 5. /vs11ez/g0NDESTMRM1Y0rm95 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: December 9, 1997 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the request for a reduction in the bond amount for the Cutler Ridge Subdivision. There are discrepancies in the requested bond reduction and our recommended bond reduction which mainly have to do with the paving not being done in accordance with Town Standards. It is recommended that the bond be reduced to $514,000.00. Attached is a copy of the adjusted bond estimate. JCl/jsv Attachment /� TOWN OF SOUTH WINDS t 000 PROJEi:T: 7 vj __t r�-� 10 VREET: Av2tg BOND ESTIMATE FORM 14 P&Z I.D.: '17 - 41 P ENGINEER: /4L�b ►k�i,c-� 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit QuantitY Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS * 0� 2. StriE& Stockpile Top§oil CyI d 3Sb 2 3. Earth Excavation (Excluding Roadway 3 & Trench 3 6 10.00 1 6,3 4. RoadwaX Excavation 0\3L 12.00b { 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 31(.k 12. 37 944 7 h Trench Exc. 0-1 U 1 3SO 8. Earth Trench Exc. -2 Sb 1 g 40 • r 9. RoadwU Exc. Rock 10. Rock Trench Ex -4 11. Rock Trench Exc. -1 75.00 12. Rock Trench Ex 0-15 CY — 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc. -20 CY 150.00 14. F rmati n of Subgade sy '11 O1 1 /O t'rl 15. Subbase'Gravel CY 1 4 (o 20.00 3 a O Z /3Zo 1 . Processed Ag=gate TONSa3gsjfj.004�,5so ¢Z�93o 17. common Borrow 18. Gravel Borrow 19. _ " Bit. Concrete (041 O 34 no 34jJ'�0 1 I TONS 50.00 20. " Bit. Concrete � ) 33 oo o *varies Page 1 Sub-Total$ ��- Unit Reductioa Reduction Item Description nit Quantity Price t No. 1 No. 2 A 21 " As2halt Lip CurbingF �SSa3.00 13 V.ro Gsv 22. Road Widening m l W° 23, Conc Sidewalk 4' Wide LF aD 741A0o STORM DRAINAGE SY COMPONENTS 24. " RCP Clam IV In Place :LF 130.00 25. " RCP ass IV In PI LF 100.00 26, 4 " RCP Class rV In Place LE � 75.00 . — 27 42" RCP Class TV In Place 28. _ " RCP aass IV In Place LF 60.00 29 0" RCP Class IV In Place 24" RCP Class N In Place LF 42.00 i 1 18" RCP Class TV In Place— F 35.00 2. 1 " R P Class IV In Place LF 30.00 33. POLYEI'IiYLE M PIPE M. " AD -N-12 2 .00 35, 10" ADS-N-12 or Eaal 22.50 -- 36, 2" 7 1 " AD N-12 or Eaual 25.50 s/2 38. 1 " AD N 2 UNDERDRAINS CL t_t-Scj-z-t -OpH m5 w,+t,n. #. tW- . ...� DR 6 7Do� 9 4 " PVC DR 35 In RIPRAP 41 Modified Modifled Rip= CY 45 71'a Page 2. Sub-Total S BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction item Desaiption Unit Ouantitv Pfice cost No. 1 No. 2 42, Intermediate Ri2aR CY 45.00 43, StandardMIX CY 45.00 'DRAINA E STRUCNRES 44. T ' " Catch Basin ��� 1500.00 d� SW — 45. T " Double rate EA 2000.00 4 6W 46. T Basin EA 1500.00 ` 47. Manhole 3 Uuu — 48. Manhole wQ=Inlet EA 2500.00 49 Manhole Over Ten Feet EA 2000.00 Headwall50, 51, Endwall EA 2 x Culvert x LF r 53, 1 FlaredEnd EA3 4M.00 4 O .w 4. »Flared End EA 500.00 55, •1I« Flared End EA 550.00 56. G'i" FlarA rW EA 850.00 7 - 64nN d" U—} Epl- svo ar�o _ 58, SC-7fiM{ ," a 10' Wide, � 9. Gravel Access R l 0. Reset M.HC.B. SANITARY SEWER COMPONF.MM 1 12" PVC 40.00 2 « 63, « S � *2i ��00 * varies 0 Page 3. ' Sub-Total S GV BOND ESTIMATE Bond Bond • Unit .:eduction Reduction Item DescriRtion Unit Quantity Prim No. 1 No. 2 SAI`ITTARY SEWER STRUCTURE 65, snit Manhole EA mom ¢ 66 Sanitary Manhole wIDro2 Inlet FA 2500.00 67 Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 2000.00Id 68, STRU[TiMM &MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF 71,_ Fence L 72, Guide Rail LF 73_ End Anchoca>ze EA 74. Guide Post EA 100.00 75, Payment arkin 50 1.50 7.r 7 t i 75.00 Z;? 77 Traffic i 75.00 78, Street Lights RA im,00¢ 4- 000 79. Fumis hintt //` 40490 14-4iz9z) [Placing2.50 80, Fertilizing. Seeding and Mulching Sy-- lG /b2.50 82. Maintenance/Protection f 83, Cxn=ction Staking LS I L * varies fS SI,630 Page 4. Sub-Total$ ► . r'`t BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item QqMgti nit Ouantity Price t No. 1 No. 2 -B it . Z.-0 o �5. Iron PW EA4 d. 100.00 0,00 4,246 c Monumen EA 0 250.00 7010001zo 00 0 87, 'Driveway-Bit. Conc. SY $ �° I Z/1 J? D 88zamema-'s4vaq Sr 1,-S qp0 30,so e 89. 90. 1Z Sub-Total S a w . ov Sub-Total Page 1 $ Sub-Total Page 2 S / i of V ' W� XiV . ooSub-Total Page 3S ' G" C tj0 Sub-Total Page 4 S /o/1 no - w 7 g/ZpQ ,zoo.O0 Sub-Total Page 5 S 21m 97$ OZl , o o ¢II, 0z) Sub-Total S 25%Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ i `'c / 1, z7.z,92 TOTALS ' s'/4, 3G 3 S�y �s 6�y l4,Dde * varies Page 5. /vs11er/B0NDESTFORM1f0rm95 f i4N- 1 4-98 04 : 1 9 AM MAHFdHR I NOBU I ' h1C ,=:GEC 448332 F. 02 f 40 1169 ELLiNUTON RI) SOU71i WINI7SOx,CT 0¢p74 Ptf.860-2 V-70 5 5 FAX 860-789.7121 M NNARNP-' b1Iu'uy 13, 1998 T'OtVti OF SOU'Y -INDSOR NUCHELLE LIP! S1"I-ANT PLANNER 1.540 SULLIVfiN; A t;NqUF SOU-1 h I DSOR, CT, 0607.1 DF..AR MIC'HLLLF, PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS A FORMAL RI:QT-,r;ST''TO CHANGE PHASF LINILS AT CL"I"LFR IUDGE ACCORDING TO ATTACHED DTAGR:AN1. PI.F ASE CALL 1F YOU, ANC VURTHLR QUESTION.$ Ok NEED A\R AI)L)l'I'IONi PtiI ORMATTON, RT MANN T'vtj kC. .I3FNI' i MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta,Town Engineer DATE: January 16, 1998 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDMSION In an effort to resolve the issues at Cutler Ridge, I have evaluated: 1. All of the data presented by Mr. Mannarino. 2. The visual inspections made of the site prior to, during, and after paving. 3. Conversations with Mr. Dave Foley of Independent Materials Testing Laboratories. 4. Conversations with Mr. Dan Kosalski of VHB. S. Conversations with Town Staff. I am uncomfortable with the situation at Cutler Ridge Subdivision as there are several inconsistencies that remain. I would suggest the following: 1. Testing of several of the areas paved which would include the careful removal of a 3'x 3'area of pavement, taking compaction tests of the base, subbase and subgrade(4 readings on each level, 900 apart) removing each material carefully and a proctor test of the material made. The areas. I would recommend are: Chandler Dr. stations 2+50 Lt. &4+50 Lt.; Stedman Circle stations 3+50 Rt. &6+00 Lt.; Welles Lane station 3+50 Lt.. The reason for these tests is that the proctor values used in the compaction tests was changed and compaction recalculated. The new results mostly were at or above our 95% minimum requirement.The original proctor was based on samples of material taken by Independent Materials Testing Laboratories and the revised proctor based upon material given to Independent by Mannarino Builders. 2. Cutting out of the"soft areas"as identified on Joe Perna's marked up drawing, removing the material, placing new material and pavement in accordance with Town Standards. 3. Using VHB's report, have a finish course of pavement placed that will insure that the entire roadway meets the"total average thickness". This would mean the following MINIMUM thickness of finish pavement should be applied uniformly on these roads: Stedman Circle 2.12" Chandler Drive 2.31" Welles Lane 1.62" 4. Place underdrains(or curtain drains per Mr. Weld's letter) along the existing pavement. It is recommended that they be placed from Chandler Dr. station 1+00 Rt. to Stedman Circle station 8+00 Rt. inclusive and Welles Lane from 0+00 Rt.To 3+50 Rt.. 5. Bond Reduction Estimate reflect- a. Costs of above thickness of finish pavement. b. Reduction of completed base course of pavement base and subbase equal to area of"soft spots"plus 15%. c. Include costs for removal of soft spots"material. d. No credit for curbing. e. Include costs for modifying structure elevations. f. Cost of permanent patch areas of testing and area of failure on Stedman Circle. g. Cost of underdrains. If the results of the additional testing indicates that the compaction of the materials do not meet our minimum standards, then the materials under that road should be recompacted and retested until the results comply. I know that there are a lot of"ifs"Involved with this subdivision, however, in an effort to resolve the issue I offer these suggestions. JCl/jsv cc: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer • �pWN SE, 70-WJVI 01 s a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co�' AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 21, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on January 13, 1998 to approve your request to establish two phases for Cutler Ridge Subdivision. The two phases consist of the following lots: Phase I Lots 1-7, 23-26 Phase II Lots 8-22 These phases are established for bonding purposes. Each phase may be bonded independently. No building permits (except for PZC-approved model homes) and no certificates of occupancy will be issued within a phase until such time as the bond for that phase has been posted. Compliance with all other subdivision approval conditions and standard procedures is required. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A Castro, Chairm FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official SSW N Sf4 a m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO -txv AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 28, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41 P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Phase I This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on January 27, 1998 to set the site bond at $ 672,000. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the issuance of building permits. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: January 27, 1998 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the bond estimate for Phase I of Cutler Ridge Subdivision and recommend that it be set at $672,000.00. We have also reviewed the bond reduction request and have modified it to include those items that are currently in question. It is recommended that the bond for Phase I of Cutler Ridge Subdivision be reduced to $250,000.00. Attached is a copy of the bond estimate for your files. JCl/jsv Attachment JAN-22-1998 14:41 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.01 . r TOWN Ace eDrrry cu„�.1cnn PRC)rEcr: Cu L�i� ��(7Fi �A�IRsFi ri ) - ... .... rWN STRFZr; 1)0 �i7-4:;AZ $ R?y DND Es7wATR FA Ad, /I. ' P,�avt ah5�'� >uSB,4S�Cal ENCrIIVEER: GlQjhlA(G 1996 CALENDAR Y1rAR / j DATE: - Unit �v.•� ,l w M I Ht ! ! I 1 I) a Crrin.6 Qrrrlrni 1 ff T nit is, f. I-ti► 7 an I i� Casa 11 o I 1 li Rtarsl� P.IAvarinn I I I I 1 1 I fF*rindins AMwiWw � I (! ( I Ri Tr�nrhf l �v 1 10 9r�3 I In nn I 1 b. p I1 Q �Jr,,0 1 17 nn ' I f ' J 5• ��rsA Trmch Exe Q-4 I f`Y ! '~ I 1 A an l I! ( I I 6. Earth Tree 0. 0 v. an 10 D.5& 11 0 ! j 7 Euth TEE=o 15 „I Cyr I OW 12,915 1! o I 1 I i 8. Trench ac .20 l cY I la (1 l tR.oa 9. Roadwav Fit (R4xk) 1—Cy 5n no f 0. Roc IT— ch Etc. 0-4 l Cy `~ l 50.00.11-- Rock Tnuimb Eam I ` I R Tres. ._. , 0.15 1 CY i - I I00.00 I 11 1 I _.ROCk Tiej=h Fats._0-20 _1 CY I I 150.00 I l l ( I 1 14. FmnationoCSub IN I SY l 1 ! r< ( l.S{f j I I l i s. sunba,e ael to,q, ( 7000 113, 100 11 P1•ngemei Atmaa:n I -rows I 1OW9 1 s.0a ( P7 165 117, ° Icy 18. Gravel$oan�+r � l Cy 19. " Bit. Coc><ctere icier n ! TONS I JO D 1 50.00 1 15, 4,00 Wt. C�mga 1 Torr Z 7 3 I I !5 . I! 0 (Clan , 55 00 1 ,11 1 J • wvarsr�s r Page I I Sub-TOW S ¢fq i JAN-22-1998 14:41 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.02 N t1 MA•i X FORM awd I � I Z o t r R' t so as I Z o00 11 1 Z,D o0 I I Sidewalk 4 r �a.nra ! l 050 !! Z5 0 6o I ! _-. ?�, so• IME a tv PlUx ( LF i. f t en nn I �+s. 54• RrF cry„ tv Plea! L } } ion nn 470RIZ QjU Ly Ta PIAMI r.r IRCP CUM ly in plow-, LE if 1 ! Leo f if I I ... • Hcp clim In PIN= i 1 f sa no I if f ! �rgcp Clm T aim ! 47 anRK in rim f I L LFf f i��n f .-•- f I i ' f FIRM prm f ta• ADS.N.»nr Rmlf } f2,d on f 1 ism AbS M-12 Or F" i I f39 I 71C ZZ 72L� o I I M t t R�Uxs CoLLECOR, I 1 \ sit zS tR .,,. } I /q g I ,C. 20 70 11 0 I .r Ali R* PVC`spy 3q T,P,w f 1 t? I ./' In AA ole rv" UtvD c�(�as S� .. . ._. i Lei sip i �sl,Y1 All ty1.r..., f r-.. f �- f •e An f w • �. ■ 3 i �?41tP.•Oia� / JAN-22-1998 14:42 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 0.03 ND WrlmATp.F() M �iv Bond f Bond r t ! Unit j II Reaucciaa 1 Redvctioa I p ,� � • slondwd, 91 ! l 1 ff I I Ei.s DER./ IPKr B� �A I ) 2 aoa a o! Z o 06 11 o . . I Z I I " 000 II p I ) Jr f I ! I 11500da5gam — ! 0 I _. ��f. lye •, ( � ( r II ( I ! l ! ) IPA dwill I ! I Kw MidI I 100 p ! ROM M .6AsIAl aurci Z oo.q0 Zoomill !I p l ! _ •� S� ��!Afro�1 c$ !�� I � ! �ovo,00 I 0000 !! 0 ! 10' 'Wilts I ! rJ gp P07 700 it!I /7r700 I I i + i f � # 1 •r �� � I I ol Izoq q9S II 0 I I I `G�j3' I ! 7 00 I r �3. j /7, 70 D, 0.p � _ I i •Y .� I Qo�'2 II tic�'Z I I � � ) �a I --r.,-•.y--r-------r II II I ,ti ems. I r I .3 0 O 0) 05'aw"g i 000 �Ioy1/019�I � � 1 ao2G IA5 000lz 1 I • 4�� II Q1 I w VA. 1 Z ] .a 1 -••-,s•-w•a sa 6.1 tl I I ] ] Mw3 c I I I! I I I I -41 E 1 It Ooy� o0 oasc ( ._ ..I �,� >r+l.,�,►�s 5 Pun b0'd S87£ 889 £0Z :)NI SMU I OOSSd aa0zi ld £ti:VT 866T-ZZ-NUf JAN-22-1998 14:43 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.05 . - .. CVrru a_at unn•a cV4%I.% I Z goo I 2.SZY� I r - ro" i �. I �� I ..,., AA 1 /Lfoo I I Do Q,000 l /c�r 044 l . . too&Q.rf(.) tfv m st• I cis 000 it J0000 ;. S .7u4��UtAt L'A�i � ♦ • t0 f - . a�,o•i oi.:r.a:i 3 • . �.3 a�j0. D 53, t to 0 stit,-iow&S's 4 _... ua•Tac�fi 17 46 , q66 1 ! D 0, 60 461 el oo Sub-Torsi vye tT.ontia�encir�r Sub-Tacai: � ,�: ?if•era. ��_ — , . Y Page S. I • 1169 ELLINGTON RD SOUTH WINDSOR,CT.06074 • PH.860-289-7055 FAX.860-289-7121 February 9, 1998 RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR FEB 8 199� MARSHA BANACH,DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 1595 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. 06074 $fl _� � t• DEAR MARSHA, PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS A FORMAL REQUEST TO REDUCE THE BOND AT CUTLER RIDGE TO$228,000.00. PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >' '.> ly '` G L e�• T MANN O :;>< PJ �IDENT 3 ..............::::::.:.::::::::::::.:.:.::..:........:•i:•is•:iv:?•ii:{v:•i:^iii:vvv^}?i:iL^;:.gin:.:::::::::::::::: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: February 11, 1998 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION — BOND REDUCTION — PHASE I I apologize for my brief memorandum dated February 10, 1998 concerning the requested bond reduction for Cutler Ridge Subdivision. Mr. Mannarino's request was received on the afternoon of February 9, 1998 along with data showing the results of tests requested in my January 21, 1998 letter (copy attached). The information was reviewed and discussed with Mr. Michael Gantick at about 4:00 PM on Tuesday, February loth and a consensus to recommend the reduction of the bond to $228,000 was reached. As time was short, I typed and presented it to you prior to the Planning and Zoning meeting. To clarify what was included in each of the bond amounts recommended ($250,000 and $228,000) I present the following: 1. The recommended reduction to $250,000 estimated that no credit was given for the pavement, base, subbase and curbing, and included costs for underdrains. Since all of the pavement structure was to be replaced, the 'soft spots" in the roadway were not addressed. 2. The recommended reduction to $228,000: The results of the test areas studied showed that all areas tested were compacted to at least 95% density. The data also showed that at station 4+50 on Chandler Drive, that only 4" of subbase was in place. This was the reason I requested test borings to determine if this was isolated or was true for the entire roadway. The bond estimate provided for the removal of the "soft spot" areas as outlined by Engineering Staff and the replacement of the material in accordance with Town Standards. No credit was given for curbing; additional thickness of pavement for finish course was estimated and cost for underdrains was included in bond estimate. Enclosed for your files is a copy of the bond estimate reduction (to $228,000). Again, I apologize for any confusion my bond reduction memorandum may have caused. Attachment JCl/jsv 1" _-♦ SOWN Se co c t r 7-0-w"(1-t (-1 Sot",%44 s �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 21, 1998 Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDMSION Dear Mr. Mannarino: The Town of South Windsor has reviewed the information you sent with your January 13, 1998 letter, the information presented at our January 9, 1998 meeting, and inspections made prior to, during, and after paving. After this review, several questions as to the reliability of the roadways in the Cutler Ridge Subdivision remain. In an effort to resolve these questions, the following items need.to be addressed: 1. There has been some question on proctor values used for the subgrade, subbase, and base material compaction tests. -Therefore, we are requesting that five locations, noted below, be tested as follows: Testing would include the careful removal of a 3'x 3' area of pavement, taking compaction tests of the base, subbase and subgrade (4 readings on each level,. 900 apart) removing each material carefully and a proctor test of the material made. The areas are: Chandler Dr. stations 2+50 Lt. & 4+50 Lt.; Stedman Circle stations 3+50 Rt. &6+00 Lt.; Welles Lane station 3+50 Lt. If the results of the additional testing indicates that the compaction of the materials do not meet our minimum standards, then the materials under the road will need to be recompacted and retested until the results comply. 2. Cutting out of the "soft areas" as identified on the Town's marked up drawing, removing the material, placing new material and pavement in accordance with Town Standards will be required prior to a full bond reduction and/or final paving of the subdivision roads. Mannarino Builders January 20, 1998 Page 2. 3. Using VHB's report, have a finish course of pavement placed that will insure that the entire roadway meets the "total average thickness". This would mean the following MINIMUM thickness of finish pavement should be applied uniformly on these roads: Stedman Circle 2.12" Chandler Drive 2.31" Welles Lane 1.62" The report from VHB concerning the pavement design indicates that the finish course would eliminate any oxidizing of the base course of pavement. However, the report does not indicate a timeframe for placing the finish pavement. If the base course of pavement is left without a finish course of pavement for more than two years the Town will require that new core samples be taken and tested in the same manner as that in the VHB report. Those results should be compared with the original report's results and if required, the new pavement design would then be placed. 4. Place underdrains (or curtain drains per Mr. Welti's letter) along the existing pavement. It is recommended that they be placed from Chandler Dr. station 1+00 Rt. to Stedman Circle station 8+00 Rt. inclusive and Welles Lane from 0+00 Rt. To 3+50 Rt.. Your January 13, 1998 letter also addressed the issue of a bond reduction. After review of tests as described in 1. above, a bond reduction would be considered reflecting the following: a. Costs of above thickness of finish pavement. b. Reduction of completed base course of pavement base course, subbase, and base, equal to area of"soft spots"plus 15%. c. Include costs for removal of"soft spot"materials. d. No credit for curbing. e. Include costs for modifying structure elevations. f. Cost of permanent patch areas of testing and area of failure on Stedman Circle. g. Cost of underdrains. Please advise us as to your time frame on the above matters so we may coordinate our inspection of same. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. V y truly yours, Je ry C. a etta, P.E. T wn Engineer JCl/jsv cc: Barry Guliano, Esquire, Town Attorney Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning JAN-22-1998 14:41 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.01 • �:� � � Tn►yN nc rGr rry an�.zcnn PROMO : GU LFi?!' Q/,0(yfi �P�Rs� t ) - ,.... .... ....., (O DST FVZ40O-1 40S7- i STRE=. BOND ESTIM^T ..MRA4 PAZ I.D.• 17 All 1 OF, A9Voa&$�L Sir Pbnf 1 L:NGII+IEER: GlQjVh l A.(G 1996 CALENDAR WAA � J>677;p-Aj j* DATE: Unit Red Lim, 61 i ! ` A, rt..,►,,,:». t c I I ! �DD 0 i a Orrin b Cr�r-Irttil. T�mnil I. r-v 1 7�35 I nn I M 670 Il a I I I F.Wth Firrwv.rinn(Fi I I I ( I I I rindins Re w4wav .Pi 'Yrrnrf�l I rvW . 4 it.,..sw.v I=�-�.,,.rrti. f r,► I �,87t� I ,� �� I � SrYi !I o Earut Trench Exe n-a I c nr I ( in no I I I I I I 6 Earth Trott 0- D c I /5o3 I Ia Atf I D,9(Q I I } E r 0.15 ,1 car l Ora/ } 1. 00 i a. Trmch ac -20 ! cr I ID D I igloo I /0,400 10 I I j 9• odwav Eke, (Rook) I CY } f { in no 30. RQA Tmch E= 0.4 I CY I `~ I 50.00 } • - - I I ( I • � Rock Trench FACA 0-10 75.00 R0a Trench 9m. 0.15 iCYI • f Ido 00 f l 3.-__..Rock Tiersrh Exa._04 `I CY i I 150.00 1 14. Ptx-mation of Subtct�ada f SY 171 ( 1.5n I �t75t0.50 f l 0 I I r I '380d 3�OQ . l p t 5. Subbma otvel Me I I an on - do 30 tlS. Proomad AstgmaM I TONS ( 17Qamwoa ! I 10.00 I (} ' w Is. Gravel t�t Gy } - I 15.00 I II I I ales /37 ` 19. tCiass Bit. Cocta^eta Tt3Ns ! U I .od I /I I I s0 1 / !! • . ;�0:_. � $ct. coo�a I ��lo I I f "��v'3v I ! c©au EL TONS, 2 55.0 } 0 I I �«varim Palo I Sub-Tam!S l i JAN-22-1999 14:41 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.02 • full &MMA'i M I ORM -. i BOW 1 . • .... I IZIS 0 1 nn 511PO 11 I 1 r RomawMint C=21eft I I Z D I T I I .._ i so 0o I iZ o0OI ! 1Z,Dop I 4'VAdg LF �35, _� 3o.nn I Zti,o5O11 ZS�yp�� I _-. 60,IRQ!CIM IV Id RA f cF f_ I fin nn 4' RCE I,P,1mm I L l I inn nnAOR I Lp "62 am Ix ... I I l Sa oo I ! ! I I I 42 an f vc nn Im ! LF I r I 'n nn ! I I 1 — I I I )ME==pnw- 1 I f i It I _. a• .N.17 nr F ,.1 I I I1113I l I 12' ADS-M-17-inc- to 20 nn f 25'A D -N-Y2 nr 1:nuaf I 7s • 19" AD - 2 I Ruud I r+n .J t P.R RAMS Cat,gc f op, i 1 I 1 i E I •� .r �M= ZS T am Mae 74 I o I R* F'VC'Rfl4 M To plw 10 I +� vN Dtr7�l'�¢r�S 6'0I 79 SD I t -79 S-if I 'I"" mow•:wa; 10, 53 / (o 0 e �. i JAN-22-1998 14:42 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.03 ND E rlh AY9 F() M - .. Bond awd I Unit j !! Rwuctioo Redwian I In I / ! V I! o ! 1 Slqnd 1123 O R./ /D FiLgAll tip• ! 2aoo Qo! Zoos !1 0 ! I . . 1 [ ! I (I f !0 Sao o �. KA 0. JL Box lym ! I — ! w 1 roe Il I ! I f I I 90o p ! ! I oo 1 ! II I I d End I EA - FlamdI - I Iwo II ! } Ord M 64SIAlOftg EA IT 1 Z600,00 Z6.00 !! p I } S g Afrn�1 ct3 fry f ! �000.00 I J000 10 :a• w;do ! f 107 700 !} /7,700 I I 1 �,3 3°a I ��Dry I 39 ao I Mom SEMM cob g rti,= I 12"Pvc in ELM It IIn Mm I Mon Qnip I ! } I l ! It Vf �5 ! ! q96 ! o I ! ! ?5go i a r Vale 17- 3 Sub-Total S. i z l}Go o ,oe) • JAN-22-1998 14:43 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.04 Bead I l I Unit i Radusuim Raduainn I ( . � I t 1 1500.00 i 1500 11 0 1 S. 5attiteev M�thale , _.. �. sanitar,► MmHota I I i 1 II t . f ' .vmmo inlet 1 EA f i 250000 >�7_ , su�tta►► Matshote I • 1 � I ' . . 1.!! .... I I aver 10 I F.A I o." I 8004 II p 4 2( I I 1 I ! I II I I frMTT["t-tT ZV.lV.b%a..%r rrrsc I I 1 (! I I n l "Zilminr wall ••• i. Fnxe - i 1 L ! ! « II I I t:.it I ! ! ! I !rr~ I I t.t= 1 « rr ti ! WA ! ! a '(„W.� Fa I ! tfin nn f •r it s� 1 1 . Orrrwrw.1� MIn. ! TV • ,7t 0 1 t SA �'J 1 /6 I •s . Z 150 1 160 I I gym..SIM 150 I I Qf I V I •„M M 1 b000 II w®I- ML . . . , ... _Zama i i 7205 i , i�8 O1Z.50 1 000 . —..,.a.._ .—AL._ 09 cn 16,ofcho (0000 I 0rnt:�ylllfZllt • l _ .w .u. I s w I „ I I �3/ 37J 10 I ' y 1.Y JAN-22-1998 14:43 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.05 IrL �w f iau(tiu If,:♦ 1 �� D.I.w7rw w � l mow„ 1 �arwws I I�i�Y1/b�iNtl moo h .... l 1 moo 11too li 1400 I 0o4 I .. . tt w. t+ I w.• � I I. wr ww I I !3 ! I • . .. to Cklrf(; AVe; df- i zs i i 00,000 i! a000 I 00 ' auv-Tvisi ciyjs i -- • auo-7oisi saa�i I'1, DO � 00 zl,baa SiiD•►Rini parJPie r 1(� /3.,3 7,r � �u 7c NP I S 1 0 0, 60 Jtiir t ORi i f ��/ 4f/ 6/f- w L7`lE 1�00iLd�7CiR=r1YL1�iCLil: � ` � l� L' *vane Page S. ta9QAR�ES�ad . . a i e y 10 N Sf•/ m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•cO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 February 11, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Phase I This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on February 10, 1998 to reduce the subdivision bond from $250,000 to $228,000. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the issuance of building permits. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Plan 'ng FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: February 10, 1998 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the February 9, 1998 request for a bond reduction at Cutler Ridge Subdivision Phase I from $250,000 to $228,000. We recommend that this bond be reduced to $228,000 with the stipulation that core samples be taken in the vicinity of Chandler Drive station 4+50 to determine the base and subbase thickness'. If they show that the minimum thickness was not achieved ,as did the test area dug on January 27, 1998, then that area must be brought to the minimum thickness. JCl/jsv Attachment s w + 1 VOL. 10193' PAGE `' CONSERVATION EASEIINT This Conservation Easement made this "5«' day of March , 1998, by and between Mannari no RI , hereinafter called "GRANTOR" and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTEE" ; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is the owner of real property, hereinafter described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporation herein by reference, situated on the easterly side of AyPrV Strptnt, _ in the Town of-South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that it would be in the public interest to retain, maintain, and conserve as open space, in its natural state, a portion of the premises of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that the maintenance and conservation of said property can best be accomplished by the securing by the GRANTEE of a conservation easement over, across and upon the said property of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is willing, in consideration of the need to provide for open space, to grant to the said GRANTEE, the easement hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for the maintenance and conservation of said premises as open space; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR intends to convey the property described in Exhibit A to certain purchasers subject to this Conservation Easement and by granting said Conservation Easement to the GRANTEE shall not change the character of private ownership of said property and the public shall have no right to enter upon same. NOW, THEREFORE, the said GRANTOR does hereby give, grant, bargain and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever the right, privilege and authority as a conservation easement and restriction to perpetually preserve, protect, limit, conserve and maintain the land hereinafter described in its present natural, scenic and open condition. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATES LOCAL S N, TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR ak VOL. PAGE 8 - 2 - THE GRANTOR FURTHER COVENANTS AND AGREES: 1 . To prohibit and refrain from the following operations, unless prior written consent is obtained from the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agency or successor, on the premises conveyed herein: a. the construction or placing of buildings, structures, roads, or signs; b. the dumping or placing of soil, leaves and yard wastes, etc. , or other substances or materials as landfill or dumping or placing of trash, ashes, waste, rubbish, junk, garbage or unsightly or offensive materials; c. the excavation, dredging or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other mineral substance; d. the removal or destruction of trees (living or dead) shrubs or natural vegetation, the killing of wildlife; or e. any other activity or use detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, wildlife or the maintenance of the land and inland wetland areas in their natural, scenic and open condition. f. it is the objective of these prohibitions that the land be left in its natural state. The GRANTOR reserves unto itself, its heirs, successors, and assigns the right to continue to use the property subject to said Conservation Easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the terms hereof. The grant of the Conservation Easement shall in no way grant anyone other than the parties hereto the right to enter upon the property so conserved. The GRANTEE, or its lawful agents, may enter the property for the purpose of inspection, maintenance, and ensuring that the terms hereof are properly enforced. The foregoing Conservation Easement shall be permanent and shall be . binding upon the GRANTOR and its heirs, successors and assigns, and shall .insure to the benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns. TO,.HAVE AND TO• HObD__.the Above granted rights, privileges or authority unto the s4id GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, to its--and their own proper use. 1 f 4 VOL. PAGE 87 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Robert Mannari no has caused these presents to be signed by its proper corporate officer and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 5th day of March 1998 Signed, Sealed and Delivered Mannari no Builders Inc. in Prese a of: ' by Ger W. Bra5t, Robert ann ino , President -,,- STATE OF CONNECTICUT} }ss. East Hartford March 5 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD } Personally appeared Robert Mannari no Signer and Sealer of the aforegoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed, before me. Ger 1 d W4: 8ra y x� XyX*= 1Maxpftaaxx Commissioner of the Superior Court Wi ne Town Manager DtLte S py1N SF4 ale Sot&A 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �cf�oS R-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 March 25, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge, Phase 2 This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 24, 1998 to set the subdivision bond at $558,000.00 for the above referenced subdivision, and to reduce the bond from $558,000 to $172,000. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of the approved plans in the Town Clerk's office. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer 4 VOA. PAGE 92 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 9 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Mannarino Builders. Inc. of South Windsor. Connecticut for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ( $1 . 00 ) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, received to her/his/its full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use, alter, repair, replace, and remove storm water or storm drainage systems and appurtenances thereto, in, through, upon and over certain pieces or parcels of land as described in Exhibit A. Within said parcel(s ) described in Exhibit A, the Grantee, her/his/its successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees and bushev as may be convenient or, necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with men and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction of said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm drainage systems and to excavate and fill, and, if necessary, to alter existing water courses or form embankments over said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm- water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or .storm sewer drainage systems. The Grantor herein, for herself/himself/itself, hers/his/its successors and assigns , shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures on said easements or rights-of-way and shall not plant or allow to be planted or grown any trees thereon or perform any work thereon within said easements or rights-of-way which may endanger or interfere with said line, pipe or drainage systems . The Grantor herein for itself, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to herself/himself/itself, hers/his/its successors and assigns, to continue to use the land within which the aforesaid easements or rights-of-way have been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purpose for which these easements or rights-of-way are granted. The Grantee herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to restore and maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use upon the completion of any maintenance, operation, construction, replacement or repair work in said easement or right-of-way areas . CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATE $ LOCAL $ No. TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR I VOL. 10 1 'Q3' PAGE ( 3 The Grantee agrees to hold the Grantor, hers/his/theirs and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the construction and/or maintenance and repair of said sewer line. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this 5th day of March _ , 19 -qB Signed Sealed and Delivered GRANTOR: in he Pre nce of : Mannari no Builders, Inc. G&g5ld W. B Robert Mannaiino, President STATE OF CONNECTICUT1 } East Hartford COUNTY OF HARTFORD } On this 5th day of March , 19 '98 ,-- before me, Gerald W Brady— the undersigned officer, personally appeared Robert Mannari no , known to me (or satisfactorily proved) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In witness whereof I hereunto set m hand. Ge ald W. Brady t tx ckic xXtx; aiXWi.QXXx1RX cnAx Commissioner of the Superior Court TOWN HAL-L USE ONLY /L Approved by Town Engineer Date:�/T/16 Approved by Town Manager Date: Received for Record Time: VOL PAGE (Town Clerk) 10/27/93 S VOL., PAGE SNOW SHELF EASEMENT 3027 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that Mannarino Builders, Inc. of South Windsor, Connecticut for a VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,received to its full satisfaction of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut,does give,grant bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, its successors and assigns the right, privilege and authority to perpetually use as a snow shelf,the islands shown on a map entitled"CUTLER RIDGE Open Space Subdivision-RR Zone Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc.Subdivision Plan 860 Avery Street South Windsor,Connecticut Certified substantially correct to Class A-2 standards as defined by C.A.L.S. Alford Associates,Inc. Civil Engineers Windsor, Connecticut Wilson M. Alford,Jr.,P.E.&L.S. Dated:June 3, 1997 Scale: 1 in. =40 Ft. Sheets 7,and 7A Date Revision 7-11-97 Revised per Town Staff Comments 9-2-97 Revised per Staff Comments and P&Z Approval 9-16-97 Revised per Town Engineer's Comments 9-17-97 Iron Pin(1179) to remain and not be replaced with a monument" together with the right, privilege and authority to trespass for the purpose of utilizing said snow shelf. The Grantor herein for itself, its successors and assigns,reserves the right to itself, its successors and assigns,to continue to use the land within which the aforesaid easement has been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purpose for which this easement is granted. The Grantor herein, for itself, its successors and assigns,further agrees to maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use. The Grantee agrees to hold the Grantor,their successors and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the Grantee in utilizing said snow shelf. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this(3-'day of May, 1998. VOL. 0 6 PAGE 8 7 Signed, Sealed and Delivered GRANTOR: in the Presence of MANNARINO BUILDERS, INC. Gera W, Brady T'a are wt °� �c wrrrfir<`( STATE OF CONNECTICUT ss. Fsastilaft May 157 , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this L5'4 day of May, 1998, before me, Gerald W. Brady,the undersigned officer, personally appeared Robert Mannarino, known to me(or satisfactorily proved)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand. Gera W. Brady Corniffissioner of the Superior Court T wn Manager Date RECEIVED FOR RECORD MAY 15 1998g RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSOR LAND RECORDS VOL PAGE 1 By TOWN CLERK r • *TOWN CLERK VOI. 1007PAGE 1 8S STREET TREE EASEMENT 3028 This Street Tree Easement made this/S44-day of May, 1998,by and between MANNARINO BUILDERS,INC., a Connecticut corporation with offices in the Town of South Windsor,County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called"GRANTOR" and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called"GRANTEE"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the GRANTOR is the owner of real property, hereinafter described, situated on Avery Street in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut; and WHEREAS,the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that it would be in the public interest to retain a Street Tree Easement on a portion of the premises of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that the landscaping of said property can best be accomplished by the securing by the GRANTEE of a street tree easement over, across and upon the said property of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS,the GRANTOR is willing, in consideration of the need to provide for the street tree easement,to grant to the said GRANTEE,the easement hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for the continuation of said premises as a street tree easement; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR intends to convey the property described herein to certain purchasers subject to this street tree easement and by granting said street tree easement to the GRANTEE shall not change the character of private ownership of said property and the public shall have no right to enter upon same. NOW,THEREFORE,the said GRANTOR does hereby give,grant,bargain and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever the right, privilege and authority as a street tree easement and restriction,to plant and perpetually preserve, street trees'in their present condition a ten (10)foot tree belt along the streets as shown on a map entitled"CUTLER RIDGE Open Space Subdivision-RR Zone Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc. Subdivision Plan 860 Avery Street South Windsor,Connecticut Certified substantially correct to Class A-2 standards as defined by C.A.L.S. Alford Associates, Inc.Civil Engineers Windsor,Connecticut Wilson M. Alford,Jr., P.E.&L.S. Dated:June 3, 1997 Scale: 1 in. =40 Ft. Sheets 7, and 7A Date Revision 7-11-97 Revised per Town Staff Comments 9-2-97 Revised per Staff Comments and P&Z Approval 9-16-97 Revised per Town Engineers Comments 9-17-97 Iron Pin (1179) to remain and not be replaced with a monument". THE GRANTOR FURTHER COVENANTS AND AGREES: 1. To maintain said tree belt; and VOL. 10, 0 7 PAGE 150 9 2. To prohibit and refrain from the following operations, unless prior written consent is obtained from the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agency or successor,on the premises conveyed herein: a. the construction or placing of buildings, structures,roads, signs or fence; b. the dumping or placing of soil, leaves and yard wastes, etc., or other substances or materials as t landfill or dumping or placing of trash, ashes,waste, rubbish,junk,garbage or unsightly or offensive materials; c. the excavation,dredging or removal of loam, peat,gravel, soil,rock or other mineral substance; d. the removal or destruction of street trees. The GRANTOR reserves unto itself, its heirs, successors, and assigns the right to continue to use the property subject to said Street Tree Easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the terms hereof. The grant of the Street Tree Easement shall in no way grant anyone other than the parties hereto the right to enter upon the property subject to the easement. The GRANTEE, or its lawful agents,may enter the property for the purpose of inspection and ensuring that the terms hereof are properly enforced. The foregoing Street Tree Easement shall be permanent and shall be binding upon the GRANTOR and its heirs, successors and assigns, and shall insure to the benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors ans assigns. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights,privileges or authority unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Mannarino Builders, Inc. has caused these presents to be signed by its proper corporate officer and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this today of May, 1998. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: MANNARINO BUILDERS, INC. Ge . Brady To'a D #,Ar0A a(N a ,I'7-S Slz.Lfri"y STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. 9a9f44a tfasd. May( , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally appeared Robert Mannarino,President of Mannarino Builders,Inc., Signer and Sealer of the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed before me. Gera d W. Brady Co m issioner of the Superior Court Witnes own Manager s/r —' RECEIVED FOR RECORD MAY 15 Iggg 19 Date AT 3:n P&1 , RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSOR -`� . .ECORDS VOL 100 PAGE g T W Cl .li TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTH .WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON 4 AMW r M G Phone No. 17 3� S' Address Site Name (!.V�t'.�r'r �7r- � P&Z 'No. Owner ,CAVV\Wf, Ak `� fi w Phone •No Contractor [\t�.c�Y'\ A{~ �►r� Signature of Owner c Date: ' Signature of Design Engr Date: CHANGE (Describe location and at re f change. Include Four. (4 ) copies of plan/profile 'of Change. ) (dear rc f k s o ►. . a�0Z c.�N�+ bat nfu� f' 4.t r LL 40 Al Lrrirr Ok =Af0'arw(• i��'1M. Aeason for Change: .(Why is change required) C.I'O n't 0"6QAXt A) APPROVALS: (As Re uire Dir. . ,Of Planning Date: ' Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public ks Date: Other: - Date: STAFF COMMENTSt White - Town Engineer Yellow, -. .Applicant.,. . Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod - 'Engineering 'Department NOTE- I'.. o I 14 PROPOSED GRADING SHOM A T CUL—DE—SAG REPRESENTS ' ', •a 4 g+� HOW ME 7EMPORARY CUL—DE—SAC SHAD B£ GRADED. m s A T 77ME OF ROADWAY EXTENSION. THE AfAiN 26, SIDE Pf1RTION • ` •f- o_ OF rHE PAVEMENT SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND THE "WNNGS" SHALL BE REMOVFQ THE PROPERTY BET*rEN THE TEMPORARY ' CUL—DE—SAC RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE PERJLlANEIYT <� I� RIGHT OF WAY LINE SHALL REVERT TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY �' � .a ~ .� 'a M ' OWNERS, REMOVAL, GRADING, SEEDING, EXTEN570N OF CONCRETE �!► ao SZDEWALKS AND ALL OTHER KVRK INCIDENTAL To RE-NOWNG THE tD 4 50% CUL—DE—SAC ARE REQUIRED A T' 77ME OF STREET EXTENSION. +,�'$9.2 r1l ` O � h N/T'"VS L. MD DAM M. 9LOVE aN v AND CM7MA RDI9WSON (' y �� } •., CE V cr Lo CE - g5. 3 � 1 y � � 3��� 3 3 ,` •. cl fit,, t LF •LL G � N g t FIB= .356.5 $� k. d _ GARpGF� 354.5 CLEARING ALOWG A"Y 15' - BAS T 347.8 a •,' '' r t BE 1 + FL, zw340.1 yati / MALL i T E E u SCAN- FLX. 348 4 it c j DISTANCE AT THE 1 , APLE 7 _ T, � ROADWAY�N MSECn t _ ' co 7ERsL-cI7 N(r(RCAL OF BOTH SIDES , I +I1 - 35� 5 - Tiff BE REafOUt7) .` '�342 EXIST. SAN. J4fH ! 6 50 '�' _ 5 _ r; `'o �• i c� 3� I - ' FZ a345.65 4O2t. dd CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD .... a Js ash` 1 ' mAC3 SQyIN Sf4 y x Towt O � O G = m . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 4l�asox•co�'�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 January 21, 1998 Mr. Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Mannarino: The Town of South Windsor has reviewed the information you sent with your January 13, 1998 letter, the information presented at our January 9, 1998 meeting, and inspections made prior to, during, and after paving. After this review, several questions as to the reliability of the roadways in the Cutler Ridge Subdivision remain. In an effort to resolve these questions, the following items need to be addressed: 1. There has been some question on proctor values used for the subgrade, subbase, and base material compaction tests. -Therefore, we are requesting that five locations, noted below, be tested as follows: Testing would include the careful removal of a 3' x 3' area of pavement, taking compaction tests of the base, subbase and subgrade (4 readings on each level, 900 apart) removing each material carefully and a proctor test of the material made. The areas are: Chandler Dr. stations 2+50 Lt. & 4+50 Lt.; Stedman Circle stations 3+50 Rt. &6+00 Lt.; Welles Lane station 3+50 Lt. If the results of the additional testing indicates that the compaction of the materials do not meet our minimum standards, then the materials under the road will need to be recompacted and retested until the results comply. 2. Cutting out of the "soft areas" as identified on the Town's marked up drawing, removing the material, placing new material and pavement in accordance with Town Standards will be required prior to a full bond reduction and/or final paving of the subdivision roads. f Mannarino Builders January 20, 1998 Page 2. 3. Using VHB's report, have a finish course of pavement placed that will insure that the entire roadway meets the "total average thickness". This would mean the following MINIMUM thickness of finish pavement should be applied uniformly on these roads: Stedman Circle 2.12" Chandler Drive 2.31" Welles Lane 1.62" The report from VHB concerning the pavement design indicates that the finish course would eliminate any oxidizing of the base course of pavement. However, the report does not indicate a timeframe for placing the finish pavement. If the base course of pavement is left without a finish course of pavement for more than two years the Town will require that new core samples be taken and tested in the same manner as that in the VHB report. Those results should be compared with the original report's results and if required, the new pavement design would then be placed. 4. Place underdrains (or curtain drains per Mr. Welti's letter) along the existing pavement. It is recommended that they be placed from Chandler Dr. station 1+00 Rt. to Stedman Circle station 8+00 Rt. inclusive and Welles Lane from 0+00 Rt. To 3+50 Rt.. Your January 13, 1998 letter also addressed the issue of a bond reduction. After review of tests as described in 1. above, a bond reduction would be considered reflecting the following: a. Costs of above thickness of finish pavement. b. Reduction of completed base course of pavement base course, subbase, and base, equal to area of"soft spots"plus 15%. c. Include costs for removal of"soft spot"materials. d. No credit for curbing. e. Include costs for modifying structure elevations. f. Cost of permanent patch areas of testing and area of failure on Stedman Circle. g. Cost of underdrains. Please advise us as to your time frame on the above matters so we may coordinate our inspection of same. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. jwn ruly yours, C. a etta, P.E. Engineer JCl/jsv cc: Barry Guliano, Esquire, Town Attorney Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning • SOWN Sf� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR-COS AREA CODE 860/644-2511 March 25, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge, Phase 2 This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on March 24, 1998 to set the subdivision bond at $558,000.00 for the above referenced subdivision, and to reduce the bond from $558,000 to $172,000. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of the approved plans in the Town Clerk's office. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer SOUTH WINDSOR,CT.06074 PH.860-289-7055 FAX.860-289-7121 June 10, 1998 RECEIVED PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SOUTH WINDSOR, CT. 06074 DEAR MICHELLE, PLEASE ACCEPT THIS I-ETTER AS A FORMAL REQUEST FOR A BOND REDUCTION AT CUTLER RIDGE AT YOUR JUNE 16,1998 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL. MSIDENT , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Pla ing FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee DATE: June 23, 1998 RE: CUTLER RIDGE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the request for a bond reduction for Phase I and Phase II at Cutler Ridge. We find disagreement with some of the credits taken in the estimates provided. The estimates ignore the remedial measures requested in previous correspondence with Mr. Mannarino. We have included these in our estimate. Basically, they are underdrains and cutting out and replacing the soft spots in the roadway. In addition on my inspection of the site on June 19, 1998, I found areas within the ROW that had no topsoil or seed and were not graded. I feel that I was generous with giving 70% credit for these two items. It is recommended that the bonds be reduced to the following amounts: Phase I $126,000 Phase II $121,000 Attached is a copy of the bond estimates submitted, marked up to include the indicated changes. JCl/JSV Attachment JUN-10-1998 07:56 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.02 } r > TOWN fire -0PROJEC : c&2 n�v \snArnce�q f BOND FS?4Ma7t;;Ff1RM �IEI�GINF R: Gll� h l�G. 1996 cALz1VDwR AT yE,tR 1: r=,���� %, a..�.. I M trnit 11 jtntfry pwoo Mw t.•w. „wvv�lw. 11 /� t I * I k3 o oo 11 I O 1 ` t ! ( I � Ctrin.Q Clnr,rnilA ( 1f•nn�►iI �.. ry I ► 7�35 I I I�t Co70 !I i D ! FJ!'TI1 F.`XPAVa 7M f Rxrl�ufine Rinaetm■v 1 _0,30! I I I p I ftnrlWw Fwe .. If Sign 1 r•v I �, 7f0 1 17 nn I 51 I Iif I l) s� E nh T„alc,,•EY¢_ 0.4 I CY I In on I 61 Eu-6 JMQFA FKC. 0-10 I cx i 1roh 1 r2.ec� 118, D3lD (( 1 p I I ?.�... EffmisTt o.t� _I. cY I o(ol I12.915 �Try Ezc. 040 I car 9 Ttoad a Euc. (Rode? 1 �Y I 1 Sn AA doo II I 0 I I Ror,c T 1Fx Opt I ( 4d.dd I .• ' I � 1 � • _.. Rack T Exec. •! I �y ! � ,. Ro*Tim&9=o-;o_ _! . Cr I ! . t Potiest,an at 5„bm I sY I 171 I 1.se T 75�,�r0 11 I D I c . s„bbaw Gravel ! car 11 4 n ( .00 o I 3 !1 4. 1 0 I 16. 2MANiid A Torts 111 19.00 I �it a I eQetow I CY I I 1000 Grsrel •" — CY 1 " Sit. G'.omme ! ( / 37 I ! (( I I t) I Tons ( 144� 1 so.00 147-01 0 4 I I I I 2 . Bit. e ! I 24f'3b1 1 . r— P el Sub-Totals Itie I I ' y , JJN-10-1998 07:57 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 ?bONO EYLIM tiTE FORM 140PIRkk / Saad r �.,- 98 • UnitI I Aeoacrson I Cutting- I LEI I 7210 t 3OO j 8lloD �� I i I I [ 0 I w I so. 1 /Z, 00011 1 I I 0 I 23 49 t �o.ao 12 05011 [ [ t%m na 1 [I [ I matLP ! I �pt1 ► I r I_I. . I I ! i t 7. tug I -� II f 1 1 ! tfpI I SAM M CIS"ly aft M I 11 t Pt,ue ILE150 Rep UM In dop LE I t Am A 1 If I 3a. ne RA" i i [ s. . z ,,, ,. ,. I ss. io• d l I I II 'ew � 121 ADS.N t2 ar00 �► s' .tx �d I I �! I ce ZZ 72d. I D R i_ r Lings COU G fOk I I t QRA S w irth Ro� I I !I =It : T .r. I .Q t q0 i Z970 j t M R-¢y s I I 179s t l t 79s'fl I ., �.,.��..�o, I �.,► I -� I I 140f 1 2. �°!� 700 Ala + a JUN-10-1998 07:57 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P 04 BONA FSt1MAT�k Ft7k.IK l9 9l� - (p f 10. Bond f Unit d Unit t _ I I Redmio n i I Reduction I l l ��ti it I 0 I 11 I . I d l L� �L s flERy/ �o c �A- l 1000 0o x o 06 II f Bain o a I ! I 1 I I I l I 11500A . I I ! D QMom I I l 1 I 1 1 I I I ! t- I I PA I - I I I r- . I I ' looFA 1 4 I I { II r r IKA II M" Flaw-am I I I I ..' I r D�f�,� ►p!� 6Asr�l ate EA I 1 xs00.gD! Z,500 II ! .. S�or �ktto�l c8 I rq 1 .3000.vo .3aoo II I p ! 10, wwo I I - I....._. __t SD J.I15-00 t7 7o p it I i I i t 30Q 3goo! 1 0 O t LE D 1 7 540 0 l 3. 0 i I „ JN-10-1998 07:58 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.05 rya•r .ri.r.r..a_ sow Bond R 1 _ Unit I ( Rodumiao Redumiy,i10;9y unit_ ldlb- i 1 I I b5 i EA I 1 15 00 00 /.500 (1 I 1 bb smiurr Manboto I ( I ---- I a Into , I FA 1 1 29M.00 1 II 1 b7 sMir1,4 i m..mi. I I o �I —VA ( �nnu.na 8 00 11 I D I ON 1 i rrr-nrrr�� Mom. rr�ac� i r _ I 7f1 1t�aimnt Wits! I LF ( I ram. FA - r LAIa. tnn an dooI 76 1.40 '” �-- I Qa '� �e AID I ly0 ( Q • . ti i ( - Zoti , e, 18;oft'go i •. �_ f ■• - ff wA •Ialr. ._-..i fit I Is YaW lea ��A• d..L 1..aaA f u .. riL aa 1 JLJN-10-1998 07:59 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 06 Lo cmacme 1 awlKiluC� �D W&12�r(G AVeR d4(. I'S OOD -D �wook 'OR-sp s -c 1 3 /Z.00 153/6 11 46 I iNNi C i '� its . 50 .w�.waww�.�..�wwrw�ir .w4ow ..7.4 8;60 Zf, �-50-00 Z 700 - :O:ISP.2• ,burr-ems d a • ; �; 411 qtl&,je- J ...00 ■.i awn n. �.ni iw + . .� • '10 lAi.i T,i i r , JUN-10-1998 07:59 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.07 TOWN OF SIOU'rw umx,r%c-^n f J BOND ES ?AATF FnRKj GINEM: dGJQ j,J�c, 1996 CALENDAR YEAR ! I IL J UqMd I Tt M7 1 I�RlT1T11iM I •����•w�� hw•MUVII f ins♦ ! ►l�nr iro Prim� f"n.r f tar_ � r rr..,...0 z 41...i.k4.,. I t c I ! . I \300 ( 0 I � : 1 7 Ruin.� Crrfnkriir. � ! I 1 Tanit I rr► ! �Z1 I nn I f 0,0k,& 1 ! 0 x+"ynrriinn tF.xrindine i?n�vrsv � I � I I I Tom, ►! rV in nn I (p L 0 ! I p 1 ° 1tn,dfrav FinawNnn ! I I y�3co i ,,,,�, 1 4. Err ft Trmxk ill. 0.4 I CY I I ( 1 o an 0 __ 9011Trench Exe 0.10 cyI '1!0f9 1200 I !Q a 0ep !I I ! z _. .. 3hwAr"m W I R (02q _j5,00 19.4j� !I 1 0 $. Ew*Try Exc. 0-20 I d o w v 2ltocki CY ? f 4A AA I J II ,r i 1 ltocir MMSh Exc, 0.1i CY I ! rfd.Od I ! I ! IcyI ! 75.00 ! 11 ! i . Rods Lemm gm -is 1 CY i I I 100.00 ! I a _ Rodc_�'rea�t I r ! i I I50.00 ! J! I I sY t subbase Qravd ! CY I ' o!l 20.00 1 TONS I !3!9 L Iq.00 Comm 96=w I � • 181. Gravel _ 1 cY ! I ISM ! I - I 1 I it. ccx+crero (agn D 1 TO M4.SI ;�3�1 I so.00 119 100 I 1 o I TONS 55,00 Ov aim P e i Sub-Total; 1 I ' SUN-10-1998 08:00 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC NU bb-MrtA,TE FORM � 203 688 3485 Bond unif t , Unit f { Rolm%= 1 jteeliwee_.: I I � � t t � - I �11e► � ( • Cwtint I ` 30 .�#qo 11 t 0 I w 1 { Isomj p I t 1 I 1 rQ�� 22.1 CM loco a I ;4, 1 t D�0 1 I 1 �1 afQ 1 clan ty a` IAPhoe t LF I !� I t�n m t I I'masm.l Li: inn m t t t t t i I' i "na I I I i . I w • � t 6A 4Q i i . LF t { 717 M { ! {t t I 1 1 : ! I 36. 126 ADS•N ilL6D&N.12I l�rq M ! Z$,j4 !Igo Rkmol I p t t 1:xxr:A� s C0U4Gfo,� 1 IIf j p • vvr = T Zen� i ,� { 1�.p3 { D ASS a�'n-vtt-�9rNs LF I 3o I �.!",oa MrAdr I JUN-10-1998 08:01 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.09 . 80 D ESilMA,TIE FuftM � (� ` 19$ .. �attid Road UnitVIM (l Reduarica i Reduccioee 7/0 I p I f Ge;IA V6p s-.v". f�,JbraG,"f�R.� �� I Zod6 A 11 I b I 1 II I 000 I 0 " IFAI a I 1 fl 11 I i ., Qdl plain' ! _ I ! I ' EA ' I 1506 I+ p IPA2M 00I I I I I II t I I EA.-J..L. .. 1 i I i � . 1 ' I I � II I I .. Mid —LA& I r i � I t p I • ' I t I I I i 00 ,. I I � i 2L Ma R Mid It_EAt �- 1 t I I s o OUTt' E �0 Z 0 0 I I lSi=�1 d 06a4 CPS A t j( JQ03 1 �3oGC II I I ion wia. ! t 10 I a Il I I t I MARY LF LM ' 1 .0 lI � 1 I I3 I i5 l90 II a I 110G ro u Pop 3. Sub-Total S. 4 I i JUN-10-1998 08:01 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P_.10 + Bond 8add 7 U vau I !!> t tiadueelan s I EA ! ! s 10000 f ! 0 � 4 OL .►rtip i wte� I ► �y Am%" v •` aver to 1r't'. ! PA. ! ?i 12�1t1A.r1(s ! 4000 7A. Rptaininr WS-4 I [.F I • [ !! ! i ` Faw 1 Ira esura.R-n Atin.R• 1 t.1? i .. ! * ! � � I .. PA • MA ! t ! �irlww T A 10 T Q i 79 76 jo i • 72 •ter. 1!i I ! M„ Zaoo 1 p i I i l010�3 ! Tel 1 ! I •, •,_ - IS Zo r +. a •e,, q � 1 +�vu- JUN-10-1998 08:02 ALFORD ASSOCIATES INC 203 688 3485 P.11 -- ' :7b RAI �.. 10- w�/w:iitxf -j I I Zo06� I A I • w. i Ti I" fM f1/� .f�0 . I 8 00 you j t - _ .r. - -.IL i I v .. I gp00 ®00 o&S AD4 ri ID j0 6 0 0 0 - If oo 444 { I C%s ijacy r■ i V l) V f QV � O i>•iad sus i S �3 O _ .r w _ i 43 as75 bo /3t4¢1 lwi�;, f i lomi�o a S,_ 621 0 �J z�j :- t •eid.a ��► L J '7 c'.J,J 1 1� 7 l� / �i�� ��J 7 i 1 vria e s. 1 1 1 f I 1( 'OWN SEA C� :j 70-w-n Ole Soum m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO � AREA CODE 860/644-2511 June 24, 1998 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl#97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Phase I and II This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on June 23, 1998 to reduce the subdivision bond for Phase I from $228,000 to $126,000 and for Phase II from $172,000 to $121,000. Please forward an amendment to the bonds we are currently holding showing these reductions at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Walter J. Mealy, Vice Chairman WJM/pmm Cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official 815 Avery Street 9;0*11T4 South Windsor;CT 06074 July 14, 1998 JUL 15 1998 Mannarino Builders South Windsor. INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ 1169 Ellington Rd. CONSERVATION COMMISSIor South Windsor, CT 006074 Mr. Mannarino: We are writing to express our disappointment with your response to the existing condition that our property has been left in as a result of development of Cutler Ridge Estates. We are aware that there have been measures taken after each storm to attempt to rectify the erosion that has occurred but do not feel you have adequately addressed the damage that those storms did to our property. In a conversation with Jeff Folger after the storm of June 30, it was confirmed that the water, wood chips, traprock and soil that was deposited on our driveway and lawn was a direct result of conditions from your development. He indicated that he would mention that to you as well. We, also expected that since you had been here after the first storm that you would attempt to clean up after the second storm that left more wood chips, traprock and soil in our yard and on our driveway. Noone came in that effort and we were forced to clean the yard ourselves. Additionally the water has caused further damage to our driveway with a deepening and widening hole and a greater number of cracks and deterioration. In the nineteen years we have lived here we have not experienced this type of damage and we are very concerned about both the existing condition and the possibility of this continuing to be a problem. We have received an estimate on replacing our driveway by Boutin Brothers and they recommended that a slight rise at the top of the driveway could potentially deter water from seeking its way down to our yard. We believe that a new driveway designed this way would solve the existing situation and may be a potential deterrent to future storm damage. Consequently we are asking your company to share in the cost of this project. We look forward to resolving this issue very soon. Please notify us of your intentions within the next ten days. Thank you. Sincerely, 9-1 Cc. 7 Jtit. P'1� 1169 ELLINGTON RD SOUTH WINDSOR,CT.06074 PH.860-289-7055 South Windsor FAX.860-289-7121 INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ ....... IMMISERVATION..qqMMIS ....... .. ....................... ............. .......... .S10 N ....................... .......... ............... ............ ..... ................................. ........... ................................. ............ . .. . ... .. ... ...................... .. . ... .............................. July 20, 1998 Mr. and Mrs. Greaves 815 Avery Street South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. And Mrs. Greaves, I apologize for not responding to your letter sooner. We have made a great deal of effort to correct the erosion problem that affected your property the beginning of July. We also apologize for not helping with the clean up as you felt we should. I that we have contained the gravel so that you and your family will sustain no ..... .... ............ .... inconvenience. ........ ........ ..... .... ....... . ........ ....... . ............ ............... ... .............. . .......... ........ ..... ... . .. ke to see the estimate Boutin& Sons provided to you. Their ........... . ... . ....... . ................ ......... ....... ........................ ........... ....... ...... .... .. . .. ................................. ...................... ...........................%................... Mdm M- eh ation, to slightly raise the driveway, is one I agree with, probably ................ ................................... .............. ...........- ........... ... ...... ........ .. - 111-� .Miq that should have been considered when the original driveway was ........................... ........ .......... .............. ... ........................ ........... ........... ..........%......................... .......................... ..................................... .........t a c e I would be interested in seeing the estimate and discussing their .................... ..... .......... ........ . . ......... ..................... ...... ........ .................- ---- ... ......... ... ................- ... .......... ................... .. .....PT Osal with you so we can agree on how much financial responsibility our office ............ .................... .......... ....... ... ike for the repairing of your driveway. ... ... ......... ........................ ........................ ....................... ................ ................. ..................... ..................... ............... .......... Please contact our secretary, Marci, at our office (860) 289-7055 to set up a convenient time for us to meet and discuss your options as well as review the damage that you incurred. Sincerely, Rofbert Mannari o .......... ................ ........ ...... .. ... ................. .. .... .......... ................X. .. .... ................ ................ . . ... ............ ......... .................. ............. .... ...................................... . .... ... ..... ............. ... ..... .............. ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .................. . ..................... ............. ............. .................... ... ...... ... . ..... .......... .W ............ .... ... ..-.10 ............ . .. ....... ................................... ..................... ...... r TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE. FOR SITE &`-SUBDIVISION GENERAL: • CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON MhA0 Phone No Address ��1ri —L-'LL I tmto Site Name EJ [I 1 P&Z 'No. /7- V/p Owner ' CA ,j�.l�fAf;A� Phone No Contractor ... .....-- Signature o r `,� Date: ,�13'` Signature o h rCHANGE: (DescribSW, and nature of cha ge. Include Four (4 ) , copies of lan/profile -of Change. ) 1 , f Reason for Change: (Why is change required. ) APPROVALSi (As Required) Dir. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer Date,; Dir. of Public o ks Date:- Other:. Date: STAFF COME T White - Town Engineer Yellow. - Applicant; Pink brector of Planning Goldenrod - EMgiering Department r. ] ED' MAR 3 1999 $UUIN 'INUSuR P�.Ar3t�'t3� Dr: 29 Apple Tree Lane South Windsor, Ct 06074 February 26, 1999 Ms. Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Ms. Banach: I am writing in regard to the Cutler Ridge I property which lies adjacent to the end of Apple Tree Lane. The new homes built on Welles Lane were placed extremely close to the side of my property. So close, in fact, that my property value has depreciated thousands of dollars. The homes on Pine Knob Drive were not affected in the same manner as their deep back yards plus a wooded area lie between them and the new homes. In my situ- ation, however, the new homes were placed within 60 feet of the property line of my side yard and tower over my roof. The new homes are much taller than mine due to the fact that the turf was built up considerably by the builder before construction began. I am amazed that the builder was allowed to place homes so close to an al- ready .existing residence. To try to regain some of my lost property value, I am being forced to hire a landscaper to come up with a plan to block the view of the closely placed new homes which are visible from the beginning of Apple Tree Lane over my roof. I anticipate that this will cost me several thousands of dollars. After residing at 29 Apple Tree Lane for nearly 28 years, and paying taxes to the Town of South Windsor for that length of time, I cannot believe that Mannarino Brothers were allowed to build homes this close to my home with no consideration by the town for my property value. Furthermore, the clauses in the Conservation Easement (3592) , Vol. 1013, pages 85 and 86 were not and are not being adhered to by one of the new property owners on Welles Lane. He has removed trees and shrubs from the "buffer zone" (article D. ), he has disturbed the existing stone wall several times (article C. and F. ), and he has placed no trespassing signs in the "buffer zone" (article A. ). In fact, one evening after dark, he drilled a hole in a tree on Water Company pro- perty to place a sign. He has since removed that sign, but left a large hole in the tree, causing it to lose a considerable amount of sap much too early before spring. In closing, I am hoping that steps will be taken by your agency to prevent what has happened to me from happening elsewhere in town. It is not fair that a resident taxpayer for 28 years should have to suffer a loss of thousands of dollars in property value and then have to spend a large sum of money to try to regain the property value because a developer was allowed to construct without regard for the surrounding area. I fail to see where advanced "planning" took place, or perhaps consideration for my property was left out of the plans. Sincerely, (Mrs. ) Marie G. Baron ZT So•sN SE,` `B S ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 e•co�'�w AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 July 14, 1999 Mr. Frank Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision Dear Mr. Mannarino: There are several outstanding issues concerning the roadways in your Cutler Ridge Subdivision that must be resolved. The concerns and requirements of our January 21, 1998 letter to Mr. Robert Mannarino have not, to date, been resolved. In addition, on May 12, 1999 members of Town Staff walked the roadways in this subdivision and marked out areas that were obviously in failure. Some of these areas would be in addition to those noted in our January 21, 1998 letter. We were not able to inspect the cul-de-sac area of Chandler Drive as equipment and materials were all over the roadway. However, as has been noted in the past, the "wing"areas of the cul-de-sac need to be replaced. It now appears that this "temporary cul-de-sac"will not be temporary any longer. Therefore, replacement of the"wings" now becomes more critical as the wings will be permanent. These issues must be resolved immediately if paving is to be done this year. If the base course is to remain beyond this year, additional testing of the base pavement will be required as indicated in our January 21, 1998 letter. Page Two Mr. Frank Mannarino July 14, 1999 Please advise by July 26 1999 as to your intentions as related to our concerns and requirements for the roadways in this subdivision. Very truly yours, Pown azzetta Engineer JCl/sfg cc: Michael J. Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning I--, Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer MOWN "44 F 70-wn are U s ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•c AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 July 20, 1999 Mr. Frank Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision Dear Mr. Mannarino: The Town of South Windsor engineering staff has completed a sight line survey at your Cutler Ridge Subdivision. The results indicate that the required intersection sight distance looking south has not been met. It was also found that the stopping sight distance does not meet that required by our standards. Based upon our findings, measures must be taken to provide the required sight distance before any bond reduction or road acceptance can take place. It would be appropriate to have a meeting as soon as possible with yourself, your consultant and our staff to decide on a plan to correct these deficiencies. If you have any questions, please call me at 644- 2511, extension 245. Very, truly yours C. IazetJer t a JCl/sfg n Engineer cc: Michael J. Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer File Jul -30-99 11 :49 Tolland Bank Executive 8608753856 P.02 Sines - > Tolland Bank S,- July 30, 1999 Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor,CT 06074 RE: Mannarino Builders, Inc. Letter of Credits number 92246,92250,92251 and 1238900001 Commissioners: This letter is to confirm that the maturity dates of the above referenced Letters of Credit are hereby extended from August 1, 1999 to September 1, 1999. Except as amended by this letter all other terms and conditions of the above referenced Letters of Credit remain in full force and effect. Respectfully, Ca Ralph P. asso A Vice President Mailing Address:Post Office Box 156 ■ Tolland, Connecticut 06084 ■ 1860)875-2500 NOV-23-99 11 : 17 AM _...- ' 1169 LLLINGTON ROAD I SOOT{-!WINDSOR,Cl,06074 ' PH B60-289-7055 ' VAX.860.289.7121 I.IC#01028 I I SMALL AULUMR7006.COM i I MANNARNO BUILDER. , ANC. i Novembcr 23, 1999 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,ENGINEF..RING DEPARTMENT ATTN,JOSEPH PERNA 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT,06 :4 RE': CONSERVATION B t D DEAR MR. PERNA , PLEASE ACCEPT LETTER AS PERMISSION FOR THE TOWN 01-SOUTH I WINDSOR TO HOLD THE CONSERVATION BOND FOR CUTLER RIDGE 1, IN THE ` AMOUNT OF$ 10,000-00,TOWARDS EROSION CONTROL FOR LOT#4,9,10 AND 11 AT I CUTLER RIDGE I.IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. i SincereI �•,. +� f { ROBERT MANNARINO PRESIDFNT e-Py j o M WC,,A I fl f I f� I Ir WE BUILD OUR REPUTATION" I 1 i _I MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Date: December 15, 1999 Re: Cutler Ridge I Subdivision We have reviewed the request to reduce the bonds at Cutler Ridge I Subdivision Phases I &II to maintenance level. The Subdivision Regulations indicate that the reduction to maintenance is done twice yearly based upon the schedule listed. Since this request was made in December, the schedule indicates that staff review would be in May. Therefore the bond cannot be reduced to maintenance level until June 2000. (We will schedule an inspection of this subdivision for May 2000.) I have discussed this with Mr. Frank Mannarino and he has asked if we could reduce the bond based upon the work completed to date. We have reviewed this and almost all work has been completed with the exception of some items such as"as-built" drawings, and resolution of the edge drain at lots 6 and 7. It is our recommendation that the bonds for Phases I and II be reduced to the levels listed below. These amounts are more than the maintenance levels for both phases and is sufficient to cover the outstanding items. Phase I $70,000 Phase II $55,000 JCl/sfg S:\ENGINEER\Prof.-P&z Wetland Applications\Cutler Ridge\Reduce bond.doc Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date CAL #oges� To From Co./Dept. Co. Phone# Phone# Fax# `Ol _ �� Fax# . iowM aa+ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074.2786 ��OsoR.co�'�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 January 19, 2000 Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl 97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Phase I and Phase II This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on January 11, 2000, to reduce the subdivision bond for Phase I from $126,000 to $70,000 and the subdivision bond for Phase II from $172,000 to $55,000. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, g. " Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission WJM/dlw cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official . f Memorandum DATE: January 11,2000 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Marcia A. Banach,Director of Planning RE: BONDS Subdivision Bonds APPLICATION AMOUNT REDUCTION BALANCE 94 41P, Culter Ridge Subdivision 1:77 `— Phase $126,000 $ 56,000 $ 70,000 Phase II $172,000 $117,000�'-r`` $ 55,000 94-19P Summer Meadow Sub $ 83,000 $ 4 7,000 $ 36,000* Initiate the calling of the Letter of Credit from Webster Bank for Appl. #96-09P, Fairfield Homes in the amount of$40,000 which expires on 1/30. * Maintenance bond to expire in 1 year January 19, 2000 Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl 97- 41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision, Phase I and Phase II This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on January 11, 2000, to reduce the subdivision bond for Phase I from $126,000 to $70,000 and the subdivision bond for Phase II from $172,000 to $55,000. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Sincerely&and Wahai man Plang Commission WJM/dlw cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official 1e f -crGr-- CA�S�a, � c��%-4-t Cv, l ff di �b I � s7n�n�ti ���/ s�`n 1169 ELLINGTON ROAD �' iiiJJJ SOUTH WINDSOR,CT.06074 VV PH.860-289-7055 FAX.860-289-7121 2®IA LIC#01028 t 4 EMAIL AOL@MBI046',COMUl- 10/4/00 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT MARCIA BANACH,TOWN PLANNER 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR,CT. 06457 RE: CUTLER RIDGE I REQUEST FOR MAINTENANCE BOND. DEAR MS.BANACH, PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS A FORMAL REQUEST TO REDUCE OUR BOND AT CUTLER RIDGE I TO A MAINTENANCE LEVEL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL. SINCERELY ROBERT MANNA O PRESIDENT CC. /i a a •at/• • • Effiff \. ; in ��own of,c `B � u � �SOU& ?&UZ40t s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 S It.co AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 November 9, 2000 Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits - Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Letter of Credit: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Cutler Ridge GULF $125,000 1/21/01 In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in lieu of surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf e � `own Ole S-OUA u 9 ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ���psox•co�'��v AREA CODE 860/ 644-2511 December 14, 2000 Robert Mannarino Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl#97-41P, Cutler Ridge Subdivision We have not as yet received any renewals of the letter of credit,which expires 1/21/01 as noted in our previous renewal request. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the 1/9/01 agenda of the Planning&Zoning Commission. Calling of the letters of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal. Very truly yours, Michele R. Lipe,AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf March 27, 2001 Ms Michele Lipe Town of South Windsor Planning Sullivan Avenue RECEIVED South Windsor, CT 06074 MAR 2 7 200, SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, Subject: Cutler Ridge I Subdivision Dear Michele. My name is Richard L. Griswold and I am President of Cutler Ridge Homeowners Association. I would like to address the open areas of our subdivision known as the "islands"and what we as homeowners see as Mannarino Builder's responsibility to fulfill its obligation to the Town of South Windsor before release,or reduction of the existing bond. As we understand it,Mannarino Builders is required to install plantings and mulch on the islands in accordance with the subdivision plan. To date the plantings provided by Mannarino Builders appear not to meet the requirements of the plan in that they appear of poor quality and some appear to be dead or dying. This observation was made last fall. Further,Mannarino Builders has not placed mulch on the islands but instead has scattered untreated wood chips that has resulted in mold spreading into the soil. Our association has had landscapers look at the islands and they all recommend that the wood chips and base soil be removed in favor of topsoil. The homeowners do not want anything extraordinary done to the islands but we do insist that the islands be in the condition that the plan anticipated prior to them being accepted by the Town of South Windsor. We therefore strongly recommend that Mannarino Builder's bond not be reduced or released until these conditions have been met to your satisfaction.Please acknowledge receipt of this letter. With best regards, Richard L. Griswold 3 Chandler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 �• 1+1QTf`' +`. . ,. t �';,� f�,;�1 � $�9.5 3�rb'� .� ����r E' r ,���� �o}f1f�A'��'C�P�, `,«PIPe'''�tR',, USE C—L CRATE FOR ME C°-�-k���� Il .. ' ,C ',v,s 1 t Of� IIN 1M 11WI�\#III » •� 1111/ee:W484 61 •N y.pt IM rtti X ro a 1r 1. <.T, +{ 4et µ,'.• •y. ..r+t Y,SF ,� �r .:A.,�� R b+jjt.+ xlp.•rrvsya�i�' .1 t r'.�,'at xi a.ow : �. ti .., - CC ' Jr(i///��''''���'�� {{{{`I +�.1 ]�C .4,t #V }� �f', ./ � ?,) d `i'#.a ` ,r tic a,• it t L IPA ° 9yc. .. + •��o �4;C"r�2,� �,�"�r r a, �i, ° I � Y�.yy�y SCALE r !V [lef<. 1 f 4 f a��t t,3Y Yi •v i" 43*,t." ' .Y R zNAI L BE r rRRVV 4: v ti Y E i:_ y ,s � 1 r -s��, e.' 4 "kw. $ rh s % AS IRON ""� ! '`d+ a � ' N C tix 5 q Ar �11 �`" t; r caty r .X '.'� ! ,.,),, Y.` � Ai �?*!�';, 1� t���.,''.�r k RAMS AND =�', t r,' �r.:� k� � .,< q, ,�> � 5�`� z•,� e rt f Af 'NOARd OttAil-- i , f +f ► H 'tom g?° [. �'�/iv ��, a .._ r • 'C r ���.,+ ,p � .�4a+Ctrs � � , >I; IL , a' � � :- t�' .����,•T^ �y�",'� H, 7";�A Lr""s. �,eL ?. C'�'1•�'t!,'iN i I F,4, • x � I. .. `+o. 1v ;�r ! e. � ',;r` :�:, v '�:..r*Wire 4+�F y`4 �`r�. 4F'�.`F crl� r f''���T+!,�(�,rkd- «° ;i.�.:� t I• �.l, ems. ''. \: 1�', Y #+. r � ! Y', � s ,�C air• I ,+� t 4 k I .r wR fY�F �• "1 � .�; V i t F r� v'H•� � '� ° A*y+" >" „r „''iS •' � "5 �,� �.,ys� •td , k S N 1 � ' �'1 7 I y� ��� ',•�1 , �'vA Yy, �r• ;� I tr �.;� 1 r , �.. �< .� / �'�.I .0 "�� , "wn—•^ 'Y a � ��• y�T fr /fSri S ti 11 r...,1�"wl�Mvw"i'Y'r�47Y�"�S#nM�l�� # (sir•, ",, 7 1�� !',' t,<r r a F '�;t I :: � ✓ ,.• +".• �r�.L+JrI+�'�, -r Sq C t�� t ,.. `}+"�a � .d' f�'f� f • ° °' ''r�u. x5: .Y �' y �v" / t�$ � e. 4,Yi�� Fi Y�, �Yfp,.,v t9 h r.:' tr Y. .�,'� �' !� y C .:i-r ,. �1! •� �� ;.t J�'' .;� �,,`y 1,1;'y!1 y'¢.:: Ypv �F, � '4 ,>'A, IYy.:t`4'J #@.W �j,. i1�,1+��+��,�'.� I .. �. Y,y.,v: � tt ,� ♦.t �''''"t. �1 �',) "tS`. r .r; 1�'r+'i:t ''fA <�,V. 11�, .. .'!`�'r+`'' ref `d 0'.yn f 4 `�}�„',' •,Y a J" C'+1 0`V } •r• # _ { '•Y �y—�{ r�j�j , '9 yn. .'�,':` �+C' x •'i 1 7 A ! ♦ ':t A t .r� 1 t f�} jJy� ql� " �� t �h Iw >' �ii 1 i • nCj 4� t 7 , 1t'I� • P. Y . 1 � TRIG � .. 1• ,�� ,i• a� �, p.,' ���yplti'1 TM; T� � � ���/nyaa �y/�yQ�r r'�.yM ry�, - ) 4 y f:• Y 4 tr'F 6 'fF i,51, P Abk ,b i le ` W $ � ' ` )LE$L fiAf� t ' D�. ' .. • T (/��J��j j/� `pyi'hf I,1 'S.; t �`..°-bl ttt4'c ' 715d t��t r •�{ r+l #tKN"r�" {_ �,�� '"",{ t�,` ' 'ti'a9 r ) r'r�k ' - � ,.��� �r j!Vi 15Ri. �< I' '+ ti'�• k4� i. i 'k4'r :1� t �L, ,X Yi.-a y '+�ti • r / '�'' }aIIflrLV4� • t � :) t, � .{�; r , < .�}Y�f' '"'' W- GTT:_Tf • I f .,i�'d S''i►Y�II�i Y►Jh�7ii+f�,'Y?�"�r_lii'rl.� y y 5.r}, t 7"+, jyb ' I 'ry"� % 1 j., M. h u'� ,r��y ':.�•1 P� Ma�F � rr�t.1 �' \♦+p ra1.y::, �'. lYf'.r r re��'AST yTy�lRdyyRING I p' /r 1'4"S `pr:Rt•�-=�'r' y ak,� '°�itl?i, rt wl A�ro'•t<•'!ik ut'l,i' k ,y. , o�r.V:w�•' L.{ INTO '- u '.tk^:7i',r .0' ir;:.j.'p.;Y•, r{� ,54 ;,� t+��w6'�' 1p.+N"2",i:Clfr'a) '•1'µ )y�s.`f+> Sr^ r+tv'l}„'( y 1( Vti! ri. C ,��•' 4'v`'k'ti'7. f '7, „M1 ,�'';'G y�M1 �n'�: '4 Y'1., r �,4C �!•'.�� .,V7 �,y� <y, , R _. pit a. ,1MF'r�l? r ,,t i."�r�'•t .,�r,rr ,�s� t..`j , �' M�$�'(`R,Y ASr SHt ! .F r ,t; w i ;,rf'' 'r* •i {�''„ + ,;r.1, 7w"y'", �'i �:i:l,.'7` +.v. r f./.;� ',y '{ e1r;'�r :� '�'.1,.k_ k. r :d� z; ,t5 M1`� � •k ,V y r:,,, "r, r+, iw ``s° xr c .. ,. � '� ,�: aY xq -C y ,r .-�' '� a..k .r•.,l fi+..'>s✓,�R i .� r �'i,b�r r ;iyk '% ,�.,4R(r5 r•'�p a 2 r ,, } �� r;•y % o�y','"�w°:»"��. ,. .+''} L :fix t��' i 3 >��'. u. :a'; �d�.:,�, ,yn% :.€.r ta°y..,,�: ?:r,^ 'i�. ,r v r '� ., ,1..1 (.�' 0 ,.4fi � ' , �"}:'r u .. ,' ! �4 );t �/ .Y,f�1.. rr 'rtwS�, r K ,� y�,y A •wt;°. �:w• B d{„� .yq r s rt 1:a.,.,;"�.a rpr c}, r r ;' ':, t .'r; � .: f a ' + 'k' „a,.t, to t.ts' h S l ,mot :'+ t�.. ,.a'r 1 T � ANCHOR t niY,r Aar k. ^` ,.,ry, t r t ,°�. >. 1 1 fwr,. .'�j rr,v rL qLr;..j�,`? r�;:r D�. s*yl�r y''� vwai;; �'�t �}r .r k.�': '•1 .°ait, ;.Y.,.. .K,t: ;,:.ti a'.4' v,, r y 1;:' "'�a �¢�.', r+' ,.� rM o'iYfi"J• ,r 1p t "C• A:S, �.A'.'.' t ry :' '� : NERII►tiR BR (' 'r:.,T7�s• � M� ♦'4: '�'�"`""'lu$ri' � ).;yE''� _1t t; :' 1' '.r �F :t'.�y x �!'.} f rt° a '•.�`' v a x^'r;p �{ }y w M@ `.' "`'` Z �,ve.ir + ,'er@ , ,. 4,�►� y { 5. "1f 1Z QME EN' �;., yyxy'� "'{, a r % ;Y : t• , fit_ T k:Y �; k 1 ,�,�•1 Y.d,,` ,�w is r tC'} *' , �+ # %'R r�''�1�3t "6.i'�''�.`f*r:d s�, r 1.v f. ''' r r % f ru^♦ t � b r �t J1 I�Ct ''Y J Guts a' 1A �c 7.7 T, � '.',:' y f, r t bW '�F'Y�y s }, ,'+T'�f+isr�'."9+ b�,��,,, t•5 Y"M,e4�!i.V}�' '(�'r4 !7 '*1+'� �4 P r Y.. •h^W ' �. £ i �. <.r:� '�t .g�r� !'; "� i i ;�k GA.�. r�,.fW � 't tr '�;.`7' �, �,'•. � ,,a"? r' M1 �_• ' w40 6FI"sRf V T du. �u j E 'yy 'rkD: ,, ftr�+;.p'.' fFF P,.. ;, �' .S uk �b >"v."Li s'.,'r':. �:.. ,' 31h: •:r�r'Q'V'!A +?>I����t '• 'iy,�. ir'"I,:..,.,F'1� 9,'� .0.1�•y� ✓,,.��• ,r��t;;. ,.�. „p a ?'r•�1 w7 r tt' ?' � 'y;' :y'' ,� �?�t'A�,>;_a, ,..., .v, :,{�.i� -i,�a.. � tf y ?.1. rLJ'sS}•kA '.r�r; ,frri:: 'r }:v. °k� ,-, ,,,i- r. ".f,r ,•f..✓ F ^t+; j r 4,. t r 6, -, 4"�'i.::.{j ,}` •4„':. vt��„a:.:,{ fl k' t ..fie,e1C5tt,LL�,A"" a y Nu �. ;�' S:•{,'=4'.y,�, J;aw aF,,1;t , y!-�f 4;ti�,. '}. �.`y' f,.1 y..�; c•::' y..y ,;Cg •. 1� W ,. .,i •', 1 .i6 WA.. .I/2" $ t- ,r. a a:'^ejy,a• .0 rui•y,., u EY "4 P, h �'t•a}.4'd4"�Mf R} °s•'" 'ry "rk g r y. y i1';" iR , .ry`. ,x . }/i�}/yl q� V I, '.yrr' ��6 y.•u'f r ,�{ ,�q• ,t�:.A( o ;'' . w�O�G�: � i.•. � `/ of ,Tj-y �,,EMe�.w ,�•,...{ .x9rr n� r`!�`"''v f '.� yy��...��t w ► i °r*✓( rr r ;, M< I tC , ` L ST��.EL.COVER ! , • •.t M. l*7' r �� � �, w'� ' � ,6.>" ,�,�.� r ;;* <4 'C� E=3NbP-CO mot T*0 COATS OF At PHALTIC PA ALLCASTIN,GS Mf Ir*EIt OF H OC M f r I •.b. LARGER 312E C 1( r k °�' �S�Gf��:�l '�������� 1�•�. r a t _rc ° t� �t MORE /e}uTroN3 L�+ � r,r t t; R���'�fY; f I; �Ii�� � IIi •K� V(//]� (/y��/ .� td/ac�al� t�iwY' y�'1^w•��/ ' I r ^�i; � ,{. r p t /�fr yx a '. - � >� V� .I���:�� .. .. b t ,� s �t (, r �} 1 p ,� '%} •v �,t d f,,,a p 7�µ�1�+u f�'7" �,'� • urr` .' �, i' VV x 11 A* r • r, '` o t ? '+ � � a ,2 i111ND �/�'rN. c r., 1 �, .�' * f+r rry �L f r!' sS K e f 'b• s r,,7` j u^ ?'.:, t V° i - 4 AlIft • - �4 a .,1' •7 { `9f8, :XM ¢ �y:H ( ,...�i" t � f r', '�i ,ay. r,4^' t, r '� ' ( r , � ,rt at►R•- .r „sr S v �: ° oir r�r r r 4 `. t S : ,i t r� k ;rM1A� ;IJS '�i ' 4 jk kid y �F"� o ��. may/ r _, #AiNpR1N'1�N V..4 +M,�4YiM L tkar%, C f a to ,n �q y„ t �y*1 AI •'. p Y:y h• 1 �•r 14 wUiw • , + , , ss 1 � Q h,' x a ,•�.'•�, w,.a;� � : �f + 4.� ; !"rr. � ' ,•' >! PHO PH .[ a 4 h s v 4�R d dT 1. C 'r r x Iq.. .• u r 7° r Y f u s t g q • V ,. .: b ( ,. a r y1{i t sr�'J' ye' .t;• a r _ 7 po x '. 1. . ', fy` , � 1 ri:•..S$'�''' �f���� f� �r�k�sFx /,�� ?id x,M1?�tf �/ •t r ,� r'rA y ay � , .. _ !� u.t� �� �1, frha �R ,� w �s'P�"'P.� R(yy,r.B ♦ t �4t ,,er A1 .''T `:. k ', v ��.• !'� ':.'�� 4 =i�• � ��'j !'IY V� �����i�. (/J�{L1'{.� �},y,� Y 'fJ R Y 'V"•i'B 1, r '4 5,Fr 1 ��yfy��'• _` Syr r x •'+a '' .s t 1 r6l 7 Y .r.. ° AAA ' B y � �:,a „�!,r� r^�i,...t F 1 1. . .. 1.8 rS ryr,4, k Y,..,.C' (k'�E.1' }'' s 4.`, aT ,.r. r0r"M1 4 -1 a t Y "G 'raalra{l `f u v, r r k •,, � ,�„ 4.i�lrt xn. �R�>a,�� t�i .,thy, � �` �1 4 t•r f r ' 41, `'.irra, r ` V.';�t,�% f{.��:I,. k r1,�`,•!'4 r� {.;y � Ya s � •; r R '. f: h < .�'�1 { '.• } fti ,` t,ys :i1 a. a . r u"t.vlr+i.�w •aaatlVi •,�5. #w,WJ.L°�` 7y.,` 'td, raw i t . t .. i�to*" sf,t F Tawn OYesoiazh ?401� u 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R-co��`v AREA CODE 860/644-2511 April 4,2001 Mr. Richard L. Griswold 3 Chandler Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Cutler Ridge I Subdivision Dear Mr. Griswold: I am in receipt of your March 27,2001, letter regarding the above referenced application and your concern with landscaping of the islands. Landscaping inspections are generally done during the months of April and May. At that time, it will be determined if changes need to be made. I appreciate your input, and if I can be of further assistance,please call me at 644-2511 ext. 253. Sincerely, Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/dlf { Engineering Department Memo To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer CC: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Date: 06/26/01 Re: Cutler Ridge 97-41 P Responding to the request for bond reduction by Mannarino Builders, Inc. for the Cutler Ridge subdivision dated 10/04/00, The Engineering Department recommends keeping the bond at the present level until the outstanding items on the attached memo have been addressed. \\TOWN_HALL\VOL2\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Cutler RidpVapiene\Cutler Ridge Bond Red memo 062601 TAL.doc Page 1 of 1 Intra-Office Memorandum To: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works From: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Date: 06/25/01 Re: Cutler Ridge 97-41 P Bond reduction request to maintenance level This memo is revised to reflect the results of the meeting held on 06/22/01 between Frank Mannarino, Michele Lipe, you and me. The following items remain to be addressed prior to a bond reduction to the maintenance level and the acceptance of any roadways: Easements Upon review the following easements remain to be addressed. • Provide to Engineering Department volume and page numbers of these easements when filed. • Proposed detention basin and storm drainage easement to the Town of South Windsor bordering lots 19-26 in open space remains to be filed—new easement documents and mylars required • Property of proposed ROW at the end of Chandler is to be transferred to adjacent property owners. • Sight line easement remains to be filed on lot 22. • Drainage easement between lots 19 &20 remains to be filed—revisions required • Cutler Ridge Homeowners Association is required to file the following easements prior to bond reduction (note: these easements should have been filed prior to or along with property transfer to Cutler Ridge Homeowners Association): • Welles Lane Island • To the Town of South Windsor • Easement for paving purposes • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Easement for storm drainage purposes • Easement for water main purposes • Lot 9 • Easement for water service purposes • Lot 12 • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Lot 13 • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Stedman Circle Island • To the Town of South Windsor • Easement for paving purposes • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Easement for storm drainage purposes • Lot 15 • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Lot 16 • Easement for water service purposes • Lot 17 • Easement for water service purposes • Lot 19 • Easement for sanitary sewer purposes • Lot 20 • Lot 20 has the responsibility to keep the sidewalk clear of snow, leaves and other debris. • Lot shall be granted an easement for maintenance. S:\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Cuder Ridge\lapiene\Cutler Ridge PL3 TL062501.doc Page 1 of 3 As-Builts The following items are to be addressed on the As-Builts: • Under CALS 1996, Note 1 on every map shall include as a minimum the following: • This survey(or map) has been prepared pursuant to the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Sections 20-300b-1 through 20-300b-20 and the"Standards for Surveys and Maps in the State of Connecticut"as adopted by the Connecticut Association of Land Surveyors, Inc. on September 26, 1996; • Type of Survey; • Boundary Determination Category; and • Class (or Classes)of Accuracy. • Live signatures • The following statement must be on the plans:"The items so noted on this plan have been verified in the field as to location, elevation and completeness. The following listed items are the only deviations from the original plans approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff approved change orders: (List) (Signed and Stamped by Licensed L.S.)" • The following statement must be on the plans: "The items so noted on this plan have been verified in the field as to location, elevation, and completeness. The following listed items are the only deviations from the original plans approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff-approved change orders: (list) (Signed and Stamped by Licensed L.S.)" Sheet 1 of 7 • 2 sidewalks shown overlapping—lot 4 • Change labels for 720,723 &625 pk nails not acceptable—see monumentation Sheet 2 of 7 • OK Sheet 3 of 7 • Show sidewalk Welles Lane to end of Stedman • DMH lot 20 & 19 to be labeled DMH not yard drain • Show 342 contour Stedman Circle Sta 2+50 Sheet 4 of 7 • Show water gates at Welles Sta 3+50 • Show T.F. SMH9 • Show T.F.'s for sedimentation structure manholes • Show Inv. CB11 • Change slope of pipe CB10 to C611 to 2.5% Sheet 5 of 7 • Show what 6"pipe CB 7A is connected to Sheet 6 of 7 • Verify invert of existing SMH sta. 0+00—change order dated 9/22/97 stated intentions to lower pipe& eliminate outside drop Sheet 7 of 7 • OK S:\ENGEQEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Cutler Ridge\lapiene\Cutler Ridge PL3 TL062501.doc Page 2 of 3 r d • Monumentation Letter is required from licensed Land Surveyor stating that at the present time all iron pins and monuments have been placed and are currently in good condition and in proper location or all iron pins and monuments are to be flagged in field for inspection by the Town and location certification required by licensed Land Surveyor. • Mons. 538, 545, 547, 626, 710, 711, 712, 729, 730, - not backfilled around—backfill &verify location • Mons. 735 736—not found. • I.P. between lot 7&8 at Stedman not found • Mon. 808 now labeled as pk nail 720, 723 and 625 are not acceptable—place mon. and cover in driveway or suggest suitable alternative to be approved by Engineering Department. Pavement Chandler Drive • Driveway apron required on lot 26 • Puddling in front of C137A to be removed—provide positive flow to drainage system Detention Basin • DMH 11 replace cover marked"sewer"with manhole cover marked"storm" • Outlet structure top grates not bolted down. • Outlet structure front grate not bolted to concrete and has pulled away from structure. • Outlet structure not built to specs—grates to be placed in frame mortared to structure Sidewalk Welles Lane • 11 Welles— 1 section 7'east of 15 Welles driveway to be replaced—top damaged Utilities • 46 Stedman—Telephone box broken—replace, electrical ground rod by transformer to be made flush, ped. behind transformer to have top placed on—safety hazards. Storm Drainage • C611 both manholes to have"Storm"manhole covers. • CBs 13, 14, 15, 15A—tops to be sealed with concrete manufacturer's approved material and method. Miscellaneous • Street tree on lot 20 to be moved outside of drainage easement. S:\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Cutler Ridge\lapiene\Cutler Ridge PL3 TL062501.doc Page 3 of 3 • • Department Memo To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer CC: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Date: 06/25/01 Re: Avery Meadows 96-26P Responding to the request for bond reduction by Mannarino Builders, Inc. for the Avery Meadows development dated 10/04/00, The Engineering Department recommends keeping the bond at the present level until the outstanding items on the attached memo have been addressed. VOWN_HALLIVOL2tENGINEERTroj.-P&Z Wetland ApplicatlonsWvery MeadoMtahBondRed memo M2501 TAL.doc Page 1 of 1 Intra-Office Memorandum To: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works From: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Date: 06/25/01 Re: Avery Meadows 96-26P Bond reduction request to maintenance This memo is revised to reflect the results of the meeting held on 06/22/01 between Frank Mannarino, Michele Lipe, you and me. The following items remain to be addressed prior to a bond reduction to the maintenance level and acceptance of Hitchcock Way: Easements Upon review the following easements need to be addressed: 1. Sanitary sewer easement to N/F Josephine V. Maizon remains to be filed. (Please note Mrs. Maizon passed away this month—easement to reflect current owner)—easement to Town is not acceptable. 2. Proposed sidewalk easement to Town not required to be filed due to relocation of sidewalk in that area. 3. Open Space C remains to be deeded to Association. As-Builts • Under CALS 1996, Note 1 on every map shall include as a minimum the following: • This survey(or map)has been prepared pursuant to the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Sections 20-300b-1 through 20-300b-20 and the"Standards for Surveys and Maps in the State of Connecticut"as adopted by the Connecticut Association of Land Surveyors, Inc. on September 26, 1996; • Type of Survey; • Boundary Determination Category; and • Class (or Classes)of Accuracy. • Live signatures • The following statement must be on the plans: "The items so noted on this plan have been verified in the field as to location, elevation and completeness. The following listed items are the only deviations from the original plans approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff approved change orders: (List) (Signed and Stamped by Licensed L.S.)" • Show all utility crossings and services • Sheet 1 &2 1. Remove proposed sidewalk easement to the Town of South Windsor along Avery St (sidewalk reconstructed easement not required) 2. Show monument with coordinates at Hitchcock Way sta.4+84.54R. Monument 411 —there are two monuments placed approx. 2' apart with punched brass caps. Explain why two monuments. If correct, new maps are to be filed and deeds corrected. If not remove incorrect monument. Subdivision Plan As-Built does not show the second monument and distances labeled do not show any other monument. • Sheet 3 1. Same as sheet 1 &2 items 1-2 2. Elev. 312 contour • Sheet 4 1. Verify F.L. of SMH6 296.70 progress as-built had 296.22 2. Change slopes on profile for pipes running between SMH6 &SMH7 and C134A to CB4 Page 1 of 2 SAENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Avery Meadow\tal\Avery Meadow PL8 062501 TAL.doc • Sheet 5 1. Show locations of laterals installed not proposed • Sheets 6, 7&8 1. OK but show proper certification Monumentation 1. I.P. on Hitchcock Way between lots 2 &3 not found. Pavement Avery Street 1. Remove puddle and depression on Hitchcock Way from Sta.—0+15 to 0+10R. Storm Drainage 1. C.B.s 1&2 remove debris from inside. Utilities 1. Grounding rod lot 10 to be removed or buried tal Page 2 of 2 S:\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&Z Wetland Applications\Avery Meadow\tal\Avery Meadow PL8 062501 TAL.doc TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON l � 01 M)A C t A U Phone No.W "A "` 05 Address 116*7 5` 1 L%NA%1 74 Site Name v` vif 1r-lrjf P&Z No.. '"`4I Owner 1 lGl1 G1�`��i` 1�yr �,r ' 4C Phone No. is0 -d"-*7451�"` Contractor " A It Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design .Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change_. Include Four (4) copies of plan/profile-of- Change. ) le Re on for Change: Why is change requiredAc ) - APPROVALS (As Required) Dir. Of Planning � .h . , �L 7 Date: 11J to l Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date STAFF COMMENTS: 15 r4 ,r !e Irt Iri Pe AndicA v-e tea.. .. . i #� ' �� ` J is►, <4a ,. „ ,s 40 White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department Cutler GallJuly 1, 2001 To: Frank Mannarino Mannarino Builders Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 From: Richard L. Griswold Cutler Ridge Homeowners Association 3 Chandler Drive South Wi.ndsot, CT 06074 Subject:Change Order Dear Frank, Pursuant to our conversation last week and subsequent conversation with Rob Mannarino on June 29, Cutler Ridge Homeowners Association desires to submit a change order to the :71owr, of South .i ndsor Planning and Zoning rommission.This Chancre Order removes Mannarino Builders ' responsibility for the "islands" at Cutler Ridge in favor of the Cutler Ridge Homeowners' Association. Attached is a drawing of the landscape that the homeowners will inner-Orate upon acceptance of this change order. It is the Homeowners' desire to complete this project 1,-.1-,.e fall of 2001 . Further, as aqreed with Rob Mannarion this past Friday, Mannarino PUildcrs w-L.L proVide Tlhrcc Thousand Dollars to Cutler Ridge Homeowners ' Association during i ilia w real o Ju l y G, i ,vi aS compensation for work that would have been required of Mannarino Builders if this change order did not take place. Therefore, please submit this request to Michelle in Planning and Zoning. Should you need anything further, please contact me at your earliest. t regards, 1 B Page 1 c • '� • ' �� 3� SfG��Or, scar . i �.� N•ElC • ; Ha„1� La G os4- a r a.v. o � .i 514,.d 3 SCALE: © APPROVED BY: 1 � DRAWN 9Y(:'r' r N DATE! Z-p r REVISED r6 fp-if llQd, a—d �S •�fJ.Md..., S-F. %*w yOS DRAWING NUMBER 0Or06 S7S= 6S7S' 2 0til lr 11 PAINTED ON NO.1000N C{EARPRINT• fx►sk �� • a.� JIL • _ ' !gone i• C Y i r r be �..v�L�eo1 sCA": Q APVROVEDBy: -� � DRAWN w Y'Q'f a /�lCQ� Qw d DATE: REV I'3ED Piru q d J 4:P.t o ; S44V If @ Ec osca pE iS w+NAo S r. a1 YOS DRAWING Numma olco 87S �57C 2 ON 4 18 M11rtE�QIY MO.100011 CtEwI1MYNf• Npav'ej Fkre-%%v%iA) Area xP, fa . be pL- d x X b y h omt N. .,, '` ., / ` �.� -Car�oe�i S -"-•' L . sag►, be M-0/e ,e'd, C Mc.- Kcolje Aver s+. frOfaT Il/ej,Q PQI SCALE: O APPROVED sY f9 I! DRAWN BY reer Wuxi•/Off R1ATE: t�g3 REVISED ECOSCAPE DRAWING NUMBER ew �1f ll ff mmam ON Ma.low"CL"Itkam e Memorandum To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer Date: 10/23/01 0 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision (97-41 P) Based on a recent review of the Cutler Ridge Subdivision and discussions with Frank Mannarino, The Engineering Department recommends that the bond for this subdivision be reduced to a maintenance level. SAENG INEER\doolit\CutlerRidgeBond RedMaint.doc Spur N Sf4 o . ale s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 October 29, 2001 Mr. Robert Mannarino 1160 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Appl#97-41P Cutler Ridge I Subdivision Bond This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 23, 2001, to reduce the subdivision bond from$125,000 to a maintenance level of $122,300. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. This maintenance bond will expire on October 23, 2002. Sincerely, 7f�. 2 Walter J. Me y, Chairm Planning &Zoning Commission WJM/kag i I cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official I 'OWN SF9 m �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR,co�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 November 29, 2001 Mannarino Builders 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: Expiring Letters of Credits - Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding the following Surety Bond: PROJECTS BANK AMOUNT EXPIRATION Cutler Ridge GULF $125,000 1/21/02 In accordance with our policy for accepting surety bonds, we must have an amendment to each expiring Letter of Credit well in advance, extending the term for a one-year period from the expiration date or until the end of the maintenance period. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very truly yours, 14a.b '(114, - Michele R. Lipe Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kag ZOW N St O c .a Town ate S-OutA ?Ald6ot m . 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR.cO��� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 21, 2001 Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06095 Dear Mr. Mannarino: Re: 'Appl #97-41P, Cutler Ridge We have not as yet received any renewals of the letters of credit, which expire January 21, 2002, as noted in our previous renewal request of November 29, 2001. Please be advised that discussion of this matter will be placed on the January 8, 2002, agenda of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Calling of the letters of credit will be initiated at that time if we have not received a renewal. Very truly yours, Michele R. qLie, AICP Assistant Director of Planning MRL/kag In-House Development Review Meeting 8-27-02 Present: Banach,Reichle,Folger,Doolittle, Shaw, Gantick, Stead,Drabek Summerwood SRD Westview Office Parking DBB zone change,Maguire Rd Construction Updates Cutler Ridge/Stone Crossing subdivisions: Tennis court/mowing 1. Summerwood SRD a. Tight site,where will snow be plowed to? b. Detention basin: • design difficult to build • does not provide stormwater quality functions • is located within buffer c. DEP permit needed for dam structure? d. Numerous drainage concerns, as there are existing drainage issues in that area(see Town Engineer's review for further details): • Does drainage impact the existing systems(private yard drains and stormwater system in the street)? • Water table?Test pits? e. WPCA approval needed for sewerage, as well as the enter&hold harmless agreements for refuse collection/recycling. 2. Westview Office Park a. Possibility of eliminating existing drywell(now connected into Sullivan Ave/Ayers Rd system)? 3. DBB Zone Change: No staff input 4. Construction updates: No new major issues on ongoing construction projects 5. Cutler Ridge/Stone Crossing questions: a. Can the residents mow/maintain the Town open space along the roadway(Butler Drive)?Karl would like to see that happen; how best to accomplish that? Suggested that the residents can approach the Council under the Application Process for Modification or Expansion of Use of Town-Owned Subdivision Open Space, and request item B: Modification of existing/current Town maintenance/cultural practices. b. Can the(4) owners of the island in the large cul-de-sac erect a tennis court in the island? (Question asked by resident Mike Lanza.) Staff discussed the issues of snow removal and sight lines, and agreed that this is worth considering. The residents can submit a detailed plan showing how the tennis court would be built; fence poles must stay at least five feet from the curb, and no arborvitaes can be placed close to the street. The Town would also need a hold harmless agreement. 40*1 N at t� eT�G�� 0 , u 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074-2786 soR•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 October 1, 2002 Re: Avery Meadows 96-26P & Cutler Ridge 97-41 P Mr. Frank Mannarino Mannarino Builders, Inc. 1169 Ellington Rd. South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mannarino, The maintenance period for the Avery Meadow and Cutler Ridge subdivisions shall expire in three weeks. The Town will be performing a final site inspection of the two subdivisions and will notify your firm of any items that need to be addressed prior to the release of the maintenance bonds for these two developments. The Engineering division has yet to perform their site inspections. However, prior to a final punchlist, I wanted to inform you that a number of easements remain to be filed. For the Avery Meadow subdivision: 1. The Open Space"C"draft is OK to execute and file 2. Sanitary Sewer Easement(Open Space"C") OK to execute and file For the Cutler Ridge Subdivision: 1. Detention Basin and Storm Drainage Easement-the Town has the executed easement. Need mylar of referenced map to file with. 2. The sight line easement from the current owner of lot 22 to the Town of South Windsor remains to be filed 3. The Town has the executed easement for Sanitary Sewer Easement Bente to Mistry lot 16 in favor of lot 17. OK for you to pick this back up and file. 4. The Town has the executed easement for Sanitary Sewer Easement(Lot 19)to the Town. 5. The 17 easements over the islands on Welles Island and Stedman Circle from the homeowners association remain to be filed. I have not found any drafts of document. These could be combined into a single document. A tax conveyance form is required for each of the instruments in order for them to be filed. Please feel free for you or your attorney to give me a call if any clarification is needed to secure these easements and property transfers. Respectfully, Mr. Tracy A. LaPiene Project Engineer cc: Jeffrey B. Doolittle, Town Engineer Marcia Banach, Director of Planning \\TOWN_HALL\VOL2\ENGINEER\PROJ.P&Z WETLAND APPLIC\Avery Meadovhtal\AM CR Mannarino 100102 TL.doc Memorandum To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jeffrey Doolittle, P.E. Town Engineer IU ltD Date: 10/22/022 Re: Cutler Ridge Subdivision (97-41 P) Based on a recent review of the Cutler Ridge Subdivision and discussions with Frank Mannarino, The Engineering Department recommends that the maintenance period be extended for one month to allow the developer to finalize all the deeds and easements for this subdivision. SAENGINEERTOOLMPlanning Reviews\CutlerRidgeMaintExt.doc r/ • nl • WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. ' ENGINEERS In SURVEYORS • WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD ■ P.O. BOX 484 M WINDSOR ■ CT 06095 ■ PHONE (203) 688-7288 ■ FAX (203) 688-3485 Watershed Analysis Prepared For Mannarino Builders, Inc . Cutler Ridge Subdivision 860 Avery Street, South Windsor, CT. East Watershed Existing Conditions : Area (A) = 12:`29 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0. 30 Rainfall intensity ( i ) = 3 . 70 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 13 . 64 CFS Proposed Conditions : Flow out of detention basin = 6. 5 CFS (see detention basin analysis) Flow not detained Area (A) = 4.29 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0. 36 Rainfall intensity ( i ) = 3 . 70 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 5.70 CFS Total proposed flow = 6. 5 + 5. 70 = 12 . 20 CFS Summary : The flow to the east will be reduced from 13 . 64 CFS to 12 . 20 CFS for a 50-year storm with a time of concentration of 30 minutes . West Watershed Exi s.t i ng Condi t.i-ons : - Area (A) = 4. 85 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0 . 30 Rainfall intensity ( i ) = 2 . 80 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 4 . 07 CFS Proposed Conditions : • Area (A) = 2 . 36 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0 . 36 Rainfall intensity ( i ) = 2 . 80 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 2 . 38 CFS Summary: The flow to Avery street off the property will be reduced from 4. 07 CFS to 2 . 38 CFS for a 10-year storm with a time of concentration of 30 minutes . • BASIN BASIN MANNERINO BUILDERS, INC. 16-Jul-97 CUTLER RIDGE DETENTION BASIN HEAD IN FEET ABOVE FLOW LINE ELEV FLOW LINE 0 303 _ FLOW OUT IN CFS 12" HEAD FLOW OUT ELEV. AREA OF CONTOUR VOLUME BELOW CONTOUR 0 0 303 877 0 0.5 0.65 304 6277 3167 1 2.2 306 12321 21428 2 4.7 308 16616 50258 3 6 309 18616 67865 4 8.5 310 20616 87472 YEAR INTENSIn MAX IN MAX OUT MAX EL. DRAINAGE AREA= 10.48 100 4.0 18.86 7.00 306.40 JRUNOFF COEFF= 0.45 50 3.7 17.45 6.50 307.20 TIME OF CONCENTRA _ _30 __ 25 3.3 15.56 6.00 307.00 INTEN_S_ITY= _4 10 ___ 2.7 12.73 5.22 306.40 ANALYSIS FOR 100 YEAR STORM 2 1.7 _ 8.02 3.70 _305.60 PEAK FLOW IN= INTENSI 4 100 YEAR STORM _ TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME -- -- --- ------ Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD --- ---- -- ---- -_---_ Q OUT ELEV_ 0 0 0 0 340 0.1 0.1 303.1 6. 3.8 679 47 632 0.1 0.1 303. 1 12 7.5 2716 94 2623 0.8 1.6 303.8 18 11.3 6112 662 5450 1.2 2.7 304.2 24 15.1 1 10866 1634 9231 1.6 3.7 304.6 30 18.9 16978 2966 14011 2.0 4.7 305.0 36 16.6 23369 4658 1-8711 2.6 5.5 305.6 ` 42 14.4 26962 6631 22331 3.0 6.0 306.0 48 12.2 33757 8791 24966 3.2 6.5 306.2 54 10.0 37753 11131 26622 3.2 6.5 306.2 60 7.8 40950 13471 27479 3.4 7.0 306.4 66 5.6 43349 15991 27357 3.4 7.0 _ 306.4 72 3.3 44949 18511 26437 3.2 6.5 306.2 78 1.1 45750 20851 24899 3.2 6.5 306.2 84 0.0 45951 23191 22760 3.0 6.0 306.0 90 0.0 45951 25351 20600 2.8 5.7 305.8 96 0 45951 27418 18533 2.6 5.5 305.6 102 0 45951 29390 16560 2.4 5.2 305.4 108 0 45951 31270 14681 2.2 5.0 305.2 114 0 45951 33055 12896 ___2.0__ _4.7 _ 305_.0 120 0 45951' 34747 11204 1.6 4.2 304.8 126 0 45951 36259 9692 1.6 3.7 304.6 132 0 45951 37591 8360 1.4 3.2 304.4 138 0 45951 38743 7208 1.4 3.2 304.4 144 0 45951 39895 6056 1.2 2.7 304.2 150 0 45951 40867- -- 5084 _ 1.2 _ `2.7 304.2 ------ 156 0 45951 41839 4112 1.0 2.2 304.0 162 0 45951 42631 3320 1.0 2.2 30_4.0 168 0 45951 43423 2528 0.7 1.3 303.7 174 0 45951 43880 2070 0.6 1.0 303.6 180 0 45951 44226 1725 0.5 0.7 303.5 186 0 45951 44460 149-1-1 0.4 0.5 303.4 192 0 45951 44647 1304 0.4 0.5 303.4 198 0 45951 44834 1116 0.3 0.4 303.3 204 0 45951 44975 976 0.3 0.4 1 303.3 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS BASIN INTENSI 3.3 25 YEAR STORM _ TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0.0 0 0 280 0.0 0.0 303.0 6 3.1 560 0 560 0.1 0.1 303.1 12 6.2 2241 47 2194 0.6 1.0 303.6 18 9.3 5042 392 4650 1.0 2.2 304.0 24 12.5 8964 1184 7760 1.4 3.2 304.4 30 15.6 14007 2336 11670 1.8 4.2 304.8 36 13.7 19280 3848 15431 2.2 5.0 305.2 42 11.9 23694 5634 16260 2.6 5.5 305.6 48 10.1 27849 7607 20243 2.8 5.7 305.8 54 8.2 31146 9673 21473 3.0 6.0 306.0 60 6.4 33784 11833 21951 3.0 6.0 306.0 66 4.6 35763 13993 21769 3.0 6.0 306.0 72 2.8 37083 16153 20929 2.8 5.7 305.8 78 0.9 3774.4 16220 19524 2.6 5.5 305.E 84 0.0 37909 20192 17717 2.4 5.2 305.4 90 0.0 37909 22072- 15838 2.2 5.0 305.2 96 0.0 37909 23857 14052 2.0 4.7 305.0 102 0.0 37909 25549 12360 2.0 4.7 30_5.0 108 0.0 37909 27241 10668 1.8 4.2 304.8 114 0.0 37909 26753 9156 1.6 3.7 304.6 120 0.0 379"09 30065 7624 1.4 3.2 304.4 126 0.0 37909 31237 6672 1.2 2.7 304.2 132 0.0 37909 32209 5700- 1.2 2••.7 304.2 138 0.0 37909 33181 4728 1.0 2.2 304.0 144 0.0 37909 33973 3936 1.0 2.2 304.0 150 0.0 37909 34765 3144 0.9 1.9 303.9 156 0.0 37909 35446 2464 0.7 1.3 303.7 162 0.0 37909 35903 2007 0.6 1.0 303.6 168 0.0 37909 36248 1661 0.5 0.7 303.5 174 0.0 37909 36482 1427 0.4 0.5 303.4 1BO 0.0 37909 36670 1240 0.3 0.4 303.3 186 0.0 37909 36810 1099 0.3 0.4 303.3 192 0.0 37909 36950 959 0.3 0.4 303.3 198 0.0 37909 37091 819 0.2 0.3 303.2 204 0.0 37909 37184 725 0.2 0.3 303.2 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS BASIN INTENSM 1.7 2 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0.0 0 0 144 _0.0 0.0 303.0 6 1.6 289 0 289 0.0 0.0 303.0 12- 3.2 1154 0 1154 0.3 0.4 303.3 18 4.8 2598 140 2457 0.7 1.3 303.7 24 6.4 4616 598 4020 1.0 2.2 304.0 30 8.0 7215 1390 5826 1.2 2.7 304.2 36 7.1 9932 2362 7570 1.4 3.2 304.4 42 6.1 12309 3514 8795 1.6 3.7 304.6 48 $.2 14347 4846 9501 1.6 3.7 304.6 54 4.2 16045 6178 9867 1.6 3.7 304.6 60 3.3 17404 7510 9894 1.6 3.7 304.6 66 2.4 18423 8842 9582 1.6 3.7 304.6 _- 72 1.4 19103 10174 8930 1.6 3.7_ _ 304.6 78 0.5 19444 11506 7938 1.4 3.2 304.4 84 0.0 19529 12658 6872 1.4 3.2 304.4 90 0.0 19529 13810 5720 1.2 2.7 304.2 96 0.0 19529 14782 4748 1.0 2.2 304.0 102 0.0 19529 15574 3956 1.0 2.2 304.0 108 0.0 _19529 16366 3164 0.9 _ 1.9 _303.9 114 0.0 19529 17046 2483 0.7 1.3 303.7 120 0.0 19529 17503 2026 0.6 1.0 303.6 126 0.0 19529 17849 1680 0.5 0.7 303.5 132 0.0 19529 18083 1446 0.4 0.5 303.4 138, 0.0 19529 18270- 1259 0.3 0.4 303.3 144 0.0 19529 16410 1119 0.3 0.4 303.3 150 0.0 19529 18551 978 0.3 0.4 303.3 156 0.0 19529 18691 838 0.2 0.3 303.2 162 0.0 19529 18785 744 0.2 0.3 303.2 168 0.0 19529 16878 -•651 0.2 0.3 - - 303.2 174 0.0 19629 18972 557 0.1 0. 1 303. 1 180 0 0 19529 19019 510 0.1 0.1 303.1 186 0.0 19529 19066 464 " 0.1 0.1 303. 1 192 0.0 19529 19112 417 0.1 0.1 303.1 198 0.0 19529 19159 370 0.1 0.1 303.1 204 0.0 19529 19206 323 0.1 0.1 303.1 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS STRUCTURE AREA 'C` AxC Tc I I Q rim rirr- PIPE VIIJE vcLUL:I l Y I VELOCITY SIZE SLOPE LENGTH PACITY LOW FULL i DISCHARGE FROM/TpINC TO INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT (INCHES) 0/0 (FEET) C.F.S. FT/SEC _ FT/SEC ,;dry .4 8 .13 12 ,2`1 .13 12 q•�} _ il .(13 •5& .38 10 a•7 C32 - C�33 �15 .51 )2 2.25 15 c� 3 .2G , 4z . 11 1H y, I 4. 1 '-7 P co c'3�4A .1811 ��, . to 6o s,C.) 3 0 lg .1a I0,5G tom` 1 T .� _ o � Z � _ �72 m � cs3� -C!�� 1.63 82 1`� 14.1 3.3Co I�„ 1 ,0�� m l q 0 C 4 '1 N C�5 -C3Co 2.2 1,13 t� p . (o � ?a Z .12 5 j A o m c� 7A 1,z . '40 48 1Cp 3.9j p 0 Z Z y,2 2,o ! o • Zo 1 t � 0m ' C �I j c So ' z a � cn p 76 1 � E to a � o � 0 STRUCTURE AREA °C, A G i s 1Q PIPE PIPE- PIPE I P,E E v�:t.GGITY SIZE SLOPE LENGTH `CAPACITY LOW FULL DISCHARGE FROM/TOINC TO INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT INC TOTI(INCHES) °�o (FEET) -C.F.S FT/SEC FT/SEC —�_-- 3b ; 2,o Ia y.l l.9y s"1;c? 1,00 C& � yt .61 ;ZS ` ' Iv i y."7 1,18 2.12 ts'RcP (,oca t zo _ c8*9 14 z a r .68 37 5 6? I2.2A i� 12CP 1, Z6 n Cf3i�IS I, y S9 zo 3.�} Z v m a Z.o3 1� 3.y 3.z� I.S'RcP I o o �3 t cc) a cg-*9 .zb ,`I .�i 10 3,06 I.S 2.o S,l o 15'RcP Soo 6 I Z.S z- p n p .>.� m _0 n i z C 8-0 13 .18 4 C o fc G n � a c It 3W .SS .19 1 y,o �; b 71� can i t- 10 7,90 C" -6ti- 44 (� n 4 p (� c _ INLET STATION ul D 60 AND OFFSET P4 L71-1 l� o UI J N a N ro TIME TO INLET vA 0 - N w AREA IN ACRES 00 N N 0 Gu o° of, a N RUNOFF COEFFICIENT A I w SUM OF Al 00 _.D - N s r' Q � di- TOTAL Al W cr U' 'J' -� xco RAINFALL INTENSITY r, (0) (A U cD 0 TO INLET uh D O p G, � �l (oi p GRADE OF GUTTER U o p O G O _ CROSS SLOP -w (� O O - OF-SH0ULDER O r 3 - — DEPTH OF FLOW U1 AT GUTTER W W 06 w WIDTH OF FLOW j C7 Ul � O a 0 0 0 0 - - - Q BYPASSING INLET A -A CC C) 00 D N T -I � N N �, AI BYPASSING INLET p W oj o. .O G O 0 - a_. . (f N C = m AI ENTERING O CATCH BASIN � .� 'S3uz���oSsV�� 1�SiS 1�►� 3o°�'S aN 133HS ke 03H03H0 Wald ^ libI?1I0 l803N-II � ` ,� 103fUd rr `" ( Z wap� SISJI-IdN`d M0-1J U31iing iyO30NIM H1f10S AO NMOl S - IL I a • WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. ' ENGINEERS n SURVEYORS • WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. 200 PIGEON HILL ROAD ■ P.O. BOX 484 a WINDSOR ■ CT 06095 ■ PHONE (203) 688-7288 ■ FAX (203) 688-3485 Watershed Analysis Prepared For Mannarino Builders , Inc. Cutler Ridge Subdivision 860 Avery Street, South Windsor, CT . East Watershed Existing Conditions : Area (A) = 12.29 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0. 30 Rainfall intensity (i) = 3 . 70 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci, = 13 . 64 CFS Proposed Conditions : - Flow out of detention basin = 6.5 CFS (see detention basin analysis) Flow not detained _. Area (A) = 4.29 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0. 36 Rainfall intensity (i ) = 3 .70' in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 5.70 CFS Total proposed flow = 6.5 + 5. 70 = 12 . 20 CFS Summary : The flow to the east will be reduced from 13 . 64 CFS to 12 . 20 CFS for a 50-year storm with a time of concentration of 30 minutes . j West Watershed Exi s.t i ng Cond i t.i-ons: Area (A) = 4. 85 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0 . 30 Rainfall intensity ( i ) = 2 . 80 in/hr Flow (Q) = .Aci = 4 . 07 CFS Proposed Conditions: Area (A) = 2 . 36 acres Runoff coefficient (c) = 0 . 36 Rainfall intensity (i ) = 2 . 80 in/hr Flow (Q) = Aci = 2 . 38 CFS Summary: The flow to Avery street off the property will be reduced from 4 . 07 CFS to 2 . 38 CFS for a 10-year storm with a time of concentration of 30 minutes . BASIN BASIN MANNERINO BUILDERS, INC. 16-Jul-97 CUTLER RIDGE DETENTION BASIN HEAD IN FEET ABOVE FLOW LINE ELEV FLOW LINE 0 303 FLOW OUT IN CFS 12' HEAD FLOW OUT ELEV. AREA OF CONTOUR VOLUME BELOW CONTOUR 0 0 303 877 0 0.5 0.65 304 6277 3167 1 2.2 306 12321 21428 2 4.7 308 16616 50258 3 6 309 18616 67865 4 6.5 310 20616 87472 YEAR INTENSIn MAX IN MAX OUT MAX EL. DRAINAGE AREA= 10.48 100 4.0 18.86 7.00 306.40 RUNOFF COEFF= 0.45 50 _ 3.7 17.45 6.50 307.20 TIME OF CO_NCE_N_T_R_A _ 30_ 25 3.3 15.56 6.00 307.00 INTENSITY= 4 10 2.7 12.73 5.22 306.40 ANALYSIS FOR 100 YEAR STORM ---- - -- - --- --- -- -- - ---- --------- - 2 1.7 8.02 3.70 305.60 PEAK FLOW IN= 18.9 INTENS= 4 100 YEAR STORM _ TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0 D 0 340 0.1 0.1 303. 1 6 3.8 679 47 632 0.1 0.1 303. 1 12 7.5 2716 94 -2623 0.8 1.6 303.8 - 18 11.3 6112 662 5450 1.2 2.7 304.2 24 15.1 10866 1634 9231 1 1.6 3.7 304.6 30 18.9 16978 2966 14011 2.0 4.7 305.0 36 16.6 23369 4658 18711 2.6 5.5 305.6 42 14.4 28962 6631 22331 3.0 6.0 306.0 48 12.2 33757 8791 24966 3.2 6.5 306.2 54 10.0 37753 11131 26622 3.2 6.5 306.2 60 7.8 40950 13471 27479 3.4 7.0 306.4 66 5.6 43349 15991 27357 - 3.4 7.0 306.4 72 3.3 44949 18511 26437 3.2 6.5 306.2 78 1.1 45750 20851. 24899 3.2 6.5 306.2 84 0.0 45951 23191 22760 3.0 6.0 306.0 90 0.0 45951 25351 20600 2.8 5.7 305.8 96 0 4595r 27418 18533 2.6 5.5 305.6 102 0 45951 29390 16560 2.4 5.2 305.4 108 0 45951 31270 14681 2.2 5.0 305.2 114 0 45951 33055 12896 2.0 4.7 305.0 120 0 45951 34747 11204 1.8 4.2 304.8 126 0 45951 36259 9692 1.6 3.7 304.6 132 0 45951 37591 8360 1.4 3.2 304.4 138 0 45951 38743 7208 1.4 3.2 304.4 144 0 45951 39895 6056 1.2 2.7 304.2 150 0 45951 40867 5084 1.2 2.7 304.2 156 0 45951 41_8_39 4112 1.0 2.2 - - 304.0 162 0 45951 42631 3320 1.0 2.2 304.0 168 0 45951 43423 2528 0.7 1.3 303.7 174 0 45951 43880 2070 0.6 1.0 303.6 180 0 45951 44226 1725 0.5 0.7 303.5 186 0 45951 44460 1491 0.4 0.5 303.4 192 0 45951 44647 1304 0.4 0.5 303.4 198 0 45951 44834 1116 0.3 _ 0.4 _ 303.3 204 0 1 45951 1 44975 1 976 0.3 1 0.4 1 303.3 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS BASIN INTENSM 3.3 25 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE _HEAD Q_OUT_ _ _ ELE_V 0 0.0 0 0 280 0.0 _ 0.0 303.0 6 3.1 560 0 560 0.1 0.1 303.1 12 6.2 2241 47 2194 0.6 1.0 303.6 18 9.3 5042 392 4650 1.0 2.2 304.0 24 12.5 6964 1184 7780 1.4 3.2 304.4 30- 15.6 14007 2336 11670 1.8 4.2 304.8 36 13.7 19280 3848 15431 2.2 5.0 305.2 42 11.9 23894 5634 18260 2.6 5.5 305.6 48 10.1 27849 7607 20243 2.8 5.7 305.8 54 8.2 31146 9673 21473 3.0 6.0 306.0 60 6.4 33784 11833 21951 3.0 6.0 306.0 66 _ 4.6 35763 13993 21769 3.0 6.0 306.0 72 2.8 37083 16153 20929 2.8 5.7 305.8 78 0.9 37744 18220 19524 2.6 5.5 305.6 84 0.0 37909 20192 17717 2.4 5.2 305.4 90 0.0 37909 22072 15838 2.2 5.0 305.2 96 0.0 37909 23857 14052 2.0 4.7 305.0 102 0.0 37909 25549 12360 2.0 4.7 305.0 103 0.0 37909 27241 10668 1.8 4.2 304.8 114 0.0 37909 28753 9156 1.6 3.7 304.E 120 0.0 37909 30085 7824 1.4 _ 3.2 _304.4 126 0.0 37909 31237 6672 1.2 2.7 _ 304.2 132 0.0 37909 32209 5700 1.2 2.7 304.2 138 0.0 37909 33181 4728 - 1.0 2.2 304.0 144 0.0 37909 33973 3936 1.0 2.2 304.0 _ 150 0.0 37969 34765 3144 0.9 1.9 303.9 156. 0.0 37909 35446 2464 0.7 1.3 303.7 162 0.0 37909 35903 2007 0.6 1.0 303.6 168 0.0 37909 36248 1661 0.5 0.7 303.5 174 0.0 37909 36482 1427 0.4 0.5 303.4 180 0.0 37909 36670 1240 0.3 0.4 303.3 186 0.0 37909 36810 J1099 0.3 0.4 -- 303.3 - 192 0.0 37909 36950 959 0.3 0.4 303.3 198 0.0 37909 37091 819 0.2 0.3 303.2 204 0.0 37909 37184 72S 0.2 0.3 303.2 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS BASIN INTENSM 1.7 2 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0.0 0 0 144 0.0 0.0 303.0 6 1.6 289 0 289 0.0 0.0 303.0 12 3.2 1154 0 1154 0.3 0.4 303.3 18 4.8 2598 140 2457 0.7 1.3 303.7 24 6.4 4618 598 4020 1.0 2.2 304.0 30 8.0 7215 1390 5826 1.2 2.7 304.2 36 7.1 9932 2362 7570 1.4 3.2 304.4 42 6.1 12309 3514 8795 1.6 3.7 304.6 48 5.2 14347 4846 9501 1.6 3.7 304.6 54 4.2 16045 6178 9867 1.6 3.7 304.6 60 3.3 17404 7510 9894 1.6 3.7 304.6 66 2.4 18423 8842 9582 1.6 3.7 304.6 72 1.4 19103 10174 8930 1.6 3.7 304.6 78 0.5 19444 11506 7938 1.4 3.2 304.4 84 0.0 19529 12658 6872 1.4 3.2 304.4 _ 90 _ 0.0 19529 13810 5720 1.2 2.7 304.2 -- - ---- -- --- - - -- ----- -- - 2 96 0.0 19529 14782 4748_ 1.0 _ 2.2_ 304.0 102 0.0 19529 15574 3956 1.0 2.2 304.0 108 0.0 1952.9 16366 3164 0.9 1.9 303.9 114 0.0 19529 17046 2483 0.7 1.3 303.7 120 0.0 19529 17503 2026 0.6 1.0 303.6 126 0.0 14529 17849 1680 0.5 0.7 303.5 132 0.0 19529 18083 1446 0.4 0.5 303.4 138 0.0 19529 18270 1259 0.3 0.4 303.3 144 0.0 19529 18410 1,119 0.3 0.4 _ 303.3 150 0.0 19529 18551 978 0.3 0.4 303.3 156 0.0 19529 18691 838 0.2 0.3 303.2 162 0.0 19529 18785 744' 0.2 0'.3 303.2 168 0.0 19529 18878 651 0.2 0.3 303.2 174 0.0 19529 18972 557 0.1 0.1 303.1 180 0.0 19529 19019 510 0.1 0.1 303.1 186 0.0 19529 19066 464 0.1 0.1 303. 1 192 0.0 19529 19112 417 0.1 0.1 303.1 198 0.0 19529 19159 370 _-- 0. 1 0. 1 _303.1_ 19529 19206 323 0.1 0.1 204 0.0 303.1 7/16/97 Page 1 MANNE797.XLS STRUCTURE AREA Cl' AxC Tc I I Q rirC . rirc HIPE I VIVE vcull;l I Y VELOCITY SIZE SLOPE LENGTH CAPACITY FLOW FULL DISCHARGE FROM/TO INC TOI INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT (INCHES) °�o (FEET) C.F.S. FT/SEC FT/SEC ,27 'y g 13 12 LA cY,� -cgz .27 t3 r2 ► •�} .S7 15" • 5& .313 �a i 14,7 cat - c�3 15 .51 12 2.25 IS" 1 ,0% 1S2. c-c- ;'�3 .2( , 42 . )I y, I cis -o3A jt•2t {�2 ICI �. 1 i2,5 IS„ 1 , 3 co - z o � o to j �,� 3 0 cn.�gA-CL3� 61 Cl `-� 0 Z c-SN y 2 t o 1 2 Lt.y .1 rr^^ m 'vi v1 ct3q y>3� 1.63 0 g2 } 4,� 3.3G 15n 1 ,0�� C3- S �� �f 8 .31 12 4 H c�5 -c.t3Co 2' 1 j3 1`I 4.1 -5 3.0y, c3Co .Za 2 .12 '7 g• O n O c�� -CB7 2.4 ).z5 1 �} `I• 5.r3 j„ 3,B'� t o i ) 3 i t o S > m cap' 7A 2 . '40 48 tCa 3 q� i O n "c3`7 1 ,2 �I8 1 i3 q I•g�r tom'' ? ,p�v ' �:t '-� , Z D CL3 7 .52 C-00 31 �3 , •� y 0 y,2 2,0� l 3 m � r � 5o 10 G . Z� n a I o ca L to O PIPE PIPE PIPE _ !✓ii`� .L�v�i VELOCITY STRUCTURE AREA 'C' A G _ i I —— Q SIZE SLOPE LENGTH CAPACITY LOW FULL DISCHARGE FROM/TOINC TO INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT INC TOT (INCHES) (FEET) F.S. FT/SEC --__ �o FT/SEC - ,.Lo I� y.� .9y Is'��� I.00 Z6 5,60 C8 .q1 .b 1 Z5 ` I tv i y.'7 1,18 IZo 15,60 G$*9 N Z C C 61A 14 068: .,�l ?- Z.z9 3 0 D 3I r .68 .37 5 Ca15 I,' y S� Zo 2D3 1-0 3.`I 3.2� IS' RcP �,� a 6c) Ec� C3 �? .Zb 10 3.o6 L5 Lo q O � SED. a3A5.10 0 O .D.� m — n z 'q y a v 5�D• $A5� G n_ C z ,19 15 -1,o � in A: 10 , LAt -6b- J n �- c �u INLET STATION D p O� N AND OFFSET o Uj QO 'n iJ tJ a N ro TIME TO INLET n J Is, vA G 0 — 6, 6 w AREA IN ACRES. �s LA 00 o (fit Oo 00 -1 V/1 L 0 0 -9G, c N 6n 6) - � RUNOFF COEFFICIENT Oo 00a AI SUM OF Al 16 h J CG N 100 TOTAL AI 0) c� U' U' -� L ao RAINFALL INTENSITY If L r.t W 2 oj L L �) L G U, cN 6r Ut -� U► G Q co Q TO INLET p L 6` U� , t/I O O - - D 6: o3 � ,l 01 p GRADE OF GUTTER a � � ~C) o O O O O H O _ -OF SLOPE,_ 0 o) - OF SHOULDER F - DEPTH OF FLOW DO (� W d N ro AT GUTTER r, W w CN 0 �\ W WIDTH OF FLOW 111 (7 Ui00 — O o 0 p 0 - - - Q BYPASSING INLET J OD 0 00 a N :S 1t O - - tt O . Q W N O N 0 AI BYPASSING INLET O a N r ao _ _ AI ENTERING O -0N 09 S0 _0 - Q' CATCH BASIN 'S.3w it1d 1�il1S lgim U°j9 PbZoN 13 S 3H A8.03>103HO ala 133a1S I 21'l 'G� "e �.��' � �C! � n� 1�3f Oa "ell31b0 A8 03N'JIS30 Z wao� SISAIVNV MO'1,4 83iino HOSONIM HinoS JO NMO-L l? SPEAKERS SIGN IN NAME & ADDRESS PLEASE PRINT I (Thank you) 2 . kj�vt V 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . VOLStorm Drainage Easement PAGE 84 EXFRBIT A Those portions of lots 6, 14, 19 and 20 as designated and shown on a map entitled, "CUTLER RIDGE Open Space Subdivision-RR Zone Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc.Subdivision Plan 860 Avery Street South Windsor, Connecticut Certified substantially correct to Class A-2 standards as defined by C.A.L.S. Alford Associates,Inc.Civil Engineers Windsor,Connecticut Wilson M. Alford,Jr., P.E.&L.S. Dated:June 3, 1997 Scale: 1 in. =40 Ft. Sheet 7 Date Revision 7- 11-97 Revised per Town Staff Comments 9-2-97 Revised per Staff Comments and P&Z Approval 9-16-97 Revised per Town Engineer's Comments 9-17-97 Iron Pin (1179)'to remain and not be replaced with a monument", which map is on file, or will be filed, in the Office of the Town Clerk of South Windsor. Said Drainage Easement is more particularly described as follows: First Piece: Beginning at a monument number 733 set in Chandler Drive running easterly in a straight line by a course of S 53° 54' 33" E,for a distance of 48.36 feet to monument 731 in Stedman Circle: thence turning and running westerly along Stedman Road by a course of N 38° 53' 16" W, for a distance of 31.91 feet to monument 732; thence continuing in an arc of a curve connecting Chandler Drive having an angle of 80° 32' 21" and a radius of 15.00 feet, for a distance of 21.09 feet to the point or place of beginning. Second Piece: Beginning at a monument number 722 set in Welles Lane; thence running easterly in a straight by a course of S 50° 13' 20" E, for a distance of 36.49 feet to a point in Stedman Circle; thence turning and running westerly along Stedman Road in an arc of a curve having an angle of 04° 53' 30", for a distance of 19.21 feet to monument 721; thence continuing in an are of a curve connecting Welles Lane having an angle of 80' 24' 21" and a radius of 15.00 feet, for a distance of 21.05 feet to the point or place of beginning. Third Piece: Beginning at a point in Stedman Circle at a point 9.43 feet easterly from monument number 627 in Stedman Circle; thence running northerly in a straight line by a course of N 21' 37' 11" E, for a distance of 175.44 to a point; thence turning and running westerly in a straight line by a course of N 50°47' 38" W,for a distance of 10.49 feet to a point; thence continuing westerly in a straight line by a course of N 64'41' 20" W, for a distance of 26.76 feet to a point; thence turning and running southerly in a straight line by a course of S 08° 01' 29" E,for a distance of 33.78 feet; thence continuing southerly by a course of S 21' 37' 11" W,for a distance of 156.22 feet to a point in Stedman Circle; thence turning and running easterly along Stedman Circle in an arc of a curve having an angle of 01' 39' 49" and a radius of 388.00 feet, for a distance of 11.27 feet to monument number 627; thence continuing easterly along Stedman Circle in an arc of a curve having an angle of 09' 00' 23" and a radius of 60.00 feet, for a distance of 9.43 feet to the point or place of beginning. RECEIVED FOR RECORD8 lg AT I a �t)o Pn1 RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSORB� LAND REi✓J�RDS V�OL���!�PAG RY 'mil 1 VOL. 1 0 1 1 PAGE I I SEWER LINE EASEMENT PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS 3363 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Mannari no Builders, Inc. of South Windsor, rnnncrti ri it DOLLAR(S) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, received to its his/her full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, its successors and assigns the right, previlege and authority to construct and to perpetually maintain a sewer line, including the right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use alter, repair, replace and remove a sewer line thereto, in, through, upon and over certain piece(s) of land as described in Exhibit A. Together with the right, privilege and authority to trespass, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and repairing of said sewers, an additional feet outside of, and on either side of, the permanent Easement described in Exhibit A, which right to trespass shall terminate upon formal acceptance of the sanitary sewers by the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR; and be reasserted only on the occasion and for the duration of subsequent maintenance or repair by the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR. Within said parcel(s) described in- Exhibit A, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees .and bushes as may be convenient or necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with men and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction, maintenance or repair of said sewer line, and to excavate and fill. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STATE S .....LOCAL.S .,._.....Na X AgdLkL • ?MN CLW OF S0UM VMDS0R Sewer Eascmant VOL. Al PAGE JIB 3 EXHIBIT A Those portions of lots 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 as designated and shown on a map entitled, "CUTLER RIDGE Open Space Subdivision-RR Zone Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc. Subdivision Plan 860 Avery Street South Windsor, Connecticut Certified substantially correct to Class A-2 standards as defined by C.A.L.S. Alford Associates, Inc. Civil Engineers Windsor, Connecticut Wilson M. Alford,Jr., P.E.&L.S. Dated:June 3, 1997 Scale: 1 in. =40 Ft. Sheet 7 Date Revision 7-11-97 Revised per Town Staff Comments 9-2-97 Revised per Staff Comments and P& Z Approval 9-16-97 Revised per Town Engineer's Comments 9-17-97 Iron Pin(1179) to remain and not be replaced with a monument",which map is on file, or will be filed, in the Office of the Town Clerk of South Windsor. The Sewer Easement is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the easterly line of Avery Street, which point is S 16' 45' 02" W for a distance of 218.55 feet and S 18° 19'48" W,for a distance of 228.68 feet,both courses being in the easterly line of Avery Street, from the intersection of property belonging to the Grantor herein and land now or formerly of Gladys L. and David M. Blozie and Cynthia Robinson; thence turning and running northeasterly in a straight line by a course of N 88° 30' 17" E, for a distance of 102.65 feet to a point; thence turning and running easterly in a straight line by a course of S 73' 14' 58" E, for a distance of 161.95 feet to a point; thence continuing easterly in a straight line by a course of S 86' 29' 53" E, for a distance of 218.35 feet to a point in the westerly line of Stedman Circle; thence turning and running southerly along the said westerly line of Stedman Circle by a course of S 03' 30' 05" W, for a distance of 20.00 feet; thence turning and running westerly in a straight line by a course of N 86' 29' 55" W 212.12 feet to a point; thence turning and running southerly in a straight line by a course of S 20' 34' 00" W, for a distance of 53.96 feet to a point in the northerly line of Welles Lane; thence turning and running along the northerly line of said Welles Lane in a curve having an angle of 09' 35' 14" and a radius of 60.00 feet a distance of 10.04 feet to a point; thence continuing along the said northerly line of said Welles Lane in a curve having an angle of 09' 36' 07" and a radius of 60.00, for a distance of 10.06 feet to a point; thence turning and running northerly in a straight line by a course of N 20' 34' 00" E, for a distance of 50.84 feet to a point; thence turning westerly in a straight line by a course of N 73° 14' 58" W, for a distance of 149.22 feet to a point; thence turning and running southwesterly by a course of S 88° 30' 17" W, for a distance of 106.65 feet to a point in the easterly line of Avery Street; thence turning and running northerly along the easterly line of Avery Street by a course of N 18' 19' 48" E, for a distance of 21.26 feet to the point or place of beginning. Conservation Easement VOL. 10 13 PAGE 88 EXH[BIT A Those portions of lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 as designated and shown on a map entitled, "CUTLER RIDGE Open Space Subdivision-RR Zone Prepared for Mannarino Builders, Inc. Subdivision Plan 860 Avery Street South Windsor, Connecticut Certified substantially correct to Class A-2 standards as defined by C.A.L.S. Alford Associates,Inc. Civil Engineers Windsor, Connecticut Wilson M. Alford,Jr., P.E.&L.S. Dated:June 3, 1997 Scale: 1 in. =40 Ft.Sheet 7 Date Revision 7-11-97 Revised per Town Staff Comments 9-2-97 Revised per Staff Comments and P &Z Approval 9-16-97 Revised per Town Engineer's Comments 9-17-97 Iron Pin(1179) to remain and not be replaced with a monument", which map is on file, or will be filed, in the Office of the Town Clerk of South Windsor. Said Conservation Easement is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the easterly line of Avery Street, which point is 15.03 feet northerly from the intersection of land of the Grantor herein and land now or formerly of Kenneth and Stella Mclintock; thence running easterly in a straight line by a course of S 66°53' 26" E, a distance of 151.80 feet to a point; thence continuing easterly by a course of S 69' 56' 29" E,for a distance of 115.83 feet to a point; thence continuing easterly by a course of S 68' 23'44" E, for a distance of 808.38 feet to a point; thence continuing by a course of S 67° 52' 28" E,for a distance of 11.06 feet to a point in the easterly line of Lot No. 18 as shown on said map; thence turning and running southerly by a course of S 22° 07' 32" W, along the said easterly line of Lot No. 18, for a distance of 15 feet, to a point in the northerly line of land now or formerly of Jason D and Kathleen A. Race; thence turning and running westerly by a course of N 67° 52' 28" W, along land now or formerly of Jason D. and Kathleen A. Race, for a distance of 10.99 feet to a point; thence continuing westerly by a course of N 68° 23' 44" W, along land now or formerly of Jason D. and Kathleen A. Race, land now or formerly of Robert V. and Jane M.Mahoney, land now or formerly of Joseph E. and Marilyn J.Schoen,land now or formerly of Andrew M.,Jr. and Evelyn D. Kreller, land now or formerly of Mark and Lorrie A. Cohen, land now or formerly of Connecticut Water Company,land now or formerly of Town of South Windsor,known as Apple Tree Lane, and land now or formerly of William H. and Marie G. Baron, in part by each, for a distance of 808.11 feet to a point; thence continuing westerly by a course of N 69° 56' 29" W, along land now or formerly of William H. and Marie G. Baron and land now or formerly of Kenneth and Stella Mclintock,in part by each, for a distance of 116.03 feet to a point; thence continuing westerly by a course of.N 66' 53' 26" W, along land now or formerly of Kenneth and Stella Mclintock, for a distance of 151.31 feet to a point; thence turning and running northerly by a course of N 19°45' 13" E,in the easterly line of Avery Street, for a distance of 15.03 feet to the point or place of beginning. RECEIVED FOR RECORD JUN 9 199810, AT I a,50 1?n RECORDED RN SOUTH WINDSOR LAN ECORDSVOL Ot PAGE BY ASST.TOWN CLERK VOL PAGE 4 - 3 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its/his/her hand and seal this 5th day of March �_- , 19,58. Signed, Sealed and Delivered GRANTOR: in a Pre nce of: Mannarii2o Builders, Inc. T G 1 W. B Roe Mannar' o, Pr si en e STATE OF CONNECTICUT) COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) East Hartford On this 5th day of --March:' , 19 ` 98 , before me, - nerald W Brady , the undersigned officer, Personally appeared Robert Mannarino known to me (or satisfactorily proved) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge that he/she executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In Witness whereof I hereunto set m and. > Ger d W. Br dy /C Mrtissioner of the Superior Court Witness Town Man r L9 Date TOWN HALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer Date 4/20/90 RECEIVED FOR RECORD UUN I 199B19 AT j a:/® pgv1 RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSOR LAND RECORDS VOL IOI - PAGE—L_ — BY TOWN CLERK ASSX T MA CIERfr Trees Only mother nature could create such a thing of beauty To: Jeff Doolittle, Town Engineer From: Karl Reichle, Tree Warden Re: Trees, Cornerstone Drive Date: November 1, 2004 On October 25, 2004 Frank Mannarino of Mannarino Builders, Inc. and I mutually agreed that Mannarino Builders will install 5 tress in the spring of 2005 and will post with the Engineering Department a 5 year, $9,600.00 cash bond for the replacement of any of the street trees that need replacing as to be determined by the Tree Warden within the next five years. CC: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Michael Gantick, P.E., Director of Public Works Michele Lipe,Assistant Director of Planning Frank Mannarino, Mannarino Builders -o.*...vf.- TQi OF SOUTH WINDSOR S SITS CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE-;ORDER CONTACT PERSON ' A A-*WX/Rhone No�cF+l Address Site Naine ea 7,e 41c, 04i 'r P&Z No. 7- Owner 14 A`iW #V Ae- ,%�--Cr Vie. Ile'r r t', Phone NW. Contractor . �- a Signature of Own Date: Signature of De ign Engr. Date: e CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of Chang Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) 6�011 �GErf:. �, WE a twit.9Ak r T-FA .1:tia tee Atooft,I IV t�� Reason fdr Change: (Why is change required) yam. APPROVALS: (As Re uir ) Dir: 'Of Planning Date: / Town Engineer Date: / —4 — 2 Dr. of ,Publ`ic W r Date: Other: " Date: STAFF—ZOP4ENTS White - Town. Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink Director of Planning' ' Goldenrod -' Engineering Department 14 i6 ; �:��, o , 7 - ILLi,, Il1�'7' 4--- Cl -77 t-- UTSIDE D XJ TSIDE D 777 77 Lill .77 4L 71 °, 1 1 f •. I ,� I i,J p� �. . t { 7jr 7 it -T-7- I- STA