Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Subdivision (103)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT ? PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM 1� Application No. : 56 —5t p AUG 15 1996 Date Received: /Public Hearing by: South Windsor Receipt No. Planning & Zoning Commission APPLICANT: RSK-KELLCO, Inc. ' ADDRESS: 1744 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS Choi Chun Sik ADDRESS: 126 Oxford Dr. , So. Windsor, CT 06074 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 1363 Sullivan Ave. , So. Windsor, CT 06074 ±9 ac. Assessor's Map # 76 Parcel # 20 Zone A20 NAME, ADDRESS, & TEL & FAX # OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Bruce S. Kelley, 1744 Ellington Rd- , S_W_ ph-644-8761 Fax: 644-5650 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check all that apply) : _1 . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) X2. Subdivision/Resubdivision a. _ Subdivision _ Minor _ Major b. _ Resubdivision Minor f Major (Public Hearing Required) C. _X Conditional Approval d. _ Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) 3. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) 4. Site Plan of Development 5. General Plan of Development 6. Earth Filling [Sec. 101 and/or Earth Removal [Sec. 91 (Public Hearing Req) 7. Regulation Amendment: Zoning Subdivision 8. Amendment to Town Plan of Development 9. Temporary and Conditional Permit 10. Other (explain in detail) : Applicant Property lbwner (See reverse side for additional information) Q fc _ (UfCC cc) r C TIME FRAMES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS/PLANS 1 . Consult Planning Department for fee schedule. This application must be signed by the applicant and owner of the property and submitted in duplicate with all maps and documents required on attached checklist. 2. All prospective applicants are urged to confer with Town Planning Department and Engineering Department staff prior to submission of any application to the Commission. 3. Plans are officially received only on regular meetings (2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month) of the Planning & Zoning Commission. 4. Three (3) sets of blueprints are required on submission for review by the Town Planning and Engineering Departments. This deadline must be met if you want to ensure that your application is officially received by PZC. These plans must be submitted as complete plans -- which includes application plus all required information contained on checklist. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all information required on the checklist is submitted in one package at the time of submission -- including landscaping plans, architectural elevations, traffic report, etc. 5. After review, Town staff will notify the application of requested/required modifications. 6. If the applicant makes recommended modifications to plans, six sets revised plans must be submitted. If a Public Hearing is required (or optional but likely) then seven sets are required. Revised plans should be complete packages (applicant may disassemble previously submitted plans and reuse sheets if so desired) . STANDARD APPROVAL MODIFICATIONS FOR S�UgBDwIVISIO9N & RESUBDIVISIONS PROJECT j % 1 v �'v'I� APPL # ARCHITECT/ENGR �/Tf Jf ����r�� PROJ # DWG # DATE REV DATE 1 . This approval is for 14 lots, numbered 2. Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on (one] HxWw1 side ] of all new streets. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. �. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. �5 . Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by �( ,6. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Town Manager. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police. 7 . Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. 8. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of $1 , 000, 000. 9 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $ S-0 0 D �10. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 11 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. (conditional approval only) 12. This conditional approval allows the subdivider to proceed with construction, maintenance, and installation of improvements and utilities in accordance with the approved subdivision plan and applicable regulations of the Town in lieu of posting subdivision surety. This approval does not allow the applicant to sell or offer for sale ay lot within this subdivision under this conditional approval. Final approval must be obtained from this Commission, per Chapter 3 .D. 2 of the subdivision Regulations, prior to selling or offering for sale any lot within this subdivision. 13. This conditional approval is valid for three years from the date of approval and shall expire on (final approval only) . All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits . All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1 " = 40 ' , shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7_/�. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer (on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter it is holding. JI. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of ($50 x to s) shall be submitted to this Commission. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk' s office. 1 approvals) Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets # with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans (including architectural elevations) must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within 90 days of the date of approval. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Revised 05/23/95 "-"'� c4j J-G-VVI-f rij i fApr"-"'A G d �ta e rY� ( rZ c1 T �1P�c� U Ike 8 be- (� a_ Cds �2� tee_ Al er", r A e-y L 0-(� ("(s /0 ryw;-lu �(f - ,���-�� .S�►ti.r� S�cam,�- re rues sw71 . 4-e evyV (ter Itk O-L ° en erw CJA��v��eyes �,� �a S4lj4 d W , D OUTH WINDSOR ID:203-644-3781 F"_ " 203 644378� No .005 P .02 TOi1N OF SOUTH YIIIDSOB CHECKLIST OF BBDSQU3= SUBMISSION DOCOUiTS v rrSUIVISIONS/R1=DIVISIO1TS APPLICANT R 5 hL K — LL60 - ZN G . PROJECT NAME SUBDIVISION This checklist must be sign d by plan preparer (P.E/L.S) declaring that all required information is provided. Place a check mark for each item supplied. Subdivision -------------- (Minor { Regular I. PROJECT-PLOT INFORMATION I A. General Information l i 1. Appl. & -owner name, address x x 2. Engineer & land surveyor name, address license no. & seal x x I I ✓ 3. Key map at l" - 100' scale showing location of tract with reference to surrounding properties, streets, I x x municipal boundaries, etc. , within 5001 . Key map must include layout of streets with names, layout of lots and lot nos. , open apace land, and names of surrounding property owners. 4. A schedule of required and provided zoning district requirements including lot area, lot frontage, lot depth, x x yard setbacks, open space, variances granted, etc. I 5. North arrow and scale. x x I ✓6. Appropriate certification block. x x ✓7- Date of original and all revisions. x x L_—8. Name of development. ( x x I ' B. Plot plan at 1" - 401 scale on standard l8" x 240 or 24" x 36" sheets with a 1/2" ruled margin containing the following data. x x Developments which require more than two 24" x 36" sheets may submit the plot plan at 1" - 100' scale. - � 1. Metes and bounds description showing dimensions, bearings curve data, length TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 F"_ ", .203 644 3'781 No .005 P .03 - --- -------------- , ---Minor Regular---- ' of tangents, radii arcs, chords, and x x central angles for all centerlines and ( ' rights-of-may, and centerline curves on .streets. Monuments are required at ) f corners and angles of all new streets and new street lines, at all points of curvature and tangency, and at critical J J corners and angles of all new .Town open space. Coordinates for monuments shall J J be in tabular form. ✓2. C or CGS datum shall be used on all subdivisions accessible to controls. J The Town Engineer shall determine the J accessibility of these controls: J L-�3. Lot layout numbers, square footage of J all lots, and all lot dimensions. Iron pine are required at all property angle x z points. • I .I 4. Yard setbacks dimensioned. z J x L--5. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, J and purpose. x x _ 1 I ✓b. Proposed buildings and other structures. ( x ( x WA 7. Development phasing, if proposed. J x + x L-18. -Names of-abutting property ,owners. z x ' _ I 1 • ✓9. Proposed street names. J x z 10. All open space reserved for common or public uses. J _ I L ✓i1. A-2 certification & PEILS seals. J x ( x II. SETTING/ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 1 I Topographic map at same scale as plot plan containing all data included on the plot plan plus the following: 1. All existing structures, streer , wetlands - � and watercourses, or other environmentally Jexist•gJ sensitive areas, including enough data Istructs( beyond property, boundaries to allow a IstreetaJ x reasonable evaluation of the property's JwetlndsJ ecological relationship to surrounding Jfldpin J areas, 100 yr. floodplain. t —2. Existing and proposed contours to extend x at least 200' beyond subject property, J as follows (town mapping) : + 100, x up to 3% grades 11 contour interval 3X grade & over: 2' contour interval J Zoo` Area' Wkin OK 5KUe I +•--- 3. Boundary limits, nature, and extent of TO,JN •OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 F" ' ^'203_644 3761 No .005 P 04 -------------- ---Minor Regular— wooded areas specimen trees, and other �"x significant physical features I I ✓�+. Existing system of drainage of subject site and of any larger tract or basin of which it is a part (can use Town ( x ( x stormwater study). . _ I I 5. Drainage area map. (. * ( x 6. Drainage calculations ( * ( x 7. Pere test data, preliminary indication of septic system feasibility if individual sanitary sewer&ge systems ( * ( x provided. --- I I III. IMPROVEMENTS & CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION ✓1. Proposed utility infrastructure plans, including sanitary sewer, water, storm ( * x water management. . I ✓2. Spot and finished elevations at all property corners, corners of all structures or dwellings, existing or x ( x proposed first floor elevations. Due-to Considerable qya&�s&eon}surs-For Prop-er}j -c'orrur eUva4-;onsl I _ 3. Construction details (per standard specs.) � . ( x 4. Road and'paving cross-sections (per standard specs) ( * x 5. Proposed street names. ( ( x 6. Lighting plan and details. .LJ& 7. Landscape plan and details. 8. Dumpsters (if needed). ✓9. Site identifications signs, traffic { control signs, and directional signs ( * x • I l 10. Sight triangles at new road intersections. ( * ( x Nil 11. Sight triangles at driveway entrance. x l ✓12. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns (less detail necessary for preapplications, concept plan, and * x general plan of development. N 13. Parking plan showing spaces, size and type, aisle width, curb cuts, drives, driveways, and all ingress & egress - � } areas. and dimensions. 14. Plans and profiles. (1" 401 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 F 203 644 '3781 NO 005 P .05 ' Subdivision ----------------------- ---Minor Regular--- horizontally and 1" - 4' vertically) x '' showing the follow: I � a. Layout of streets in 'sections coordinated by stations with the J x profile. J b. Street plan showing roadways. J J drainage, and partial lot lines J J x l I c. • Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades, all tangent grades, and all vertical curve J J x information ) J I } ✓ d. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame x elevations. Drainage pipe material to J be described. N(A e. Typical/critical cross-sections where ( J grading is outside street right-of-way J 1 x or is at street right-of-way. J J E. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook, sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to J J x determine conditions. - I • I ✓" S. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer J lines and manholes, 4ncluding pipe J J material, elevations, sizes, lengths, J + J x and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for habitable buildings J shall be shown. ✓15. Traffic report (by traffic engineer) 16. open space site improvement plan. J * J x 17. Architectural elevations/information J f per Sect. 4.20 of the zoning regulations - if required by Town '.ngineer ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ABOVE 15 INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION AT THE TIME X F I X Ct ct Plan Preparer (PE/LS) Date August 1993 T0{JN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 P `2e3 644'3;? NO .005 P .06 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS APPLICANT_ IR 5 K- PROJECT NAME I E LO S D1 (� SUS l71 V i S l0l`� This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E./L.S.) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for&I applications; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplied. 1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the following information: v a. Name, address and telephone of applicant. b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. c. Name of Development. V d. Date when drawings were made. 2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet, which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within .500 feet, I" = l oo' a s per 5 u bd,v.R09 r! a. Date block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Layout of buildings. L�— c. Layout of streets and parking. ,tom- d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows. L�-- e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows. L f. Names of surrounding property owners. A g. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. +� h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties. 3. Architectural Elevations: See attached checklist for Architecture and Design Review. 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: (1) 24" x 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" x 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street lines with center line station, curve data, and parking spaces. TOUN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 P'' `20 No .005 P .07 3 644 "3781 c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened). e. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose. f. Names of abutting property owners. g. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points, or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the lot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. i. A-2 certification; P.E./L.S. Seal. 5. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of l inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: a. All existing and proposed buildings. b. Curb Lines and pavement width, sidewalks. - c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers. d. Existing and proposed water,and-gay-nsain-;ystems. e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. L__ f. Existing and pproposed contours shall be shown in not legs than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot elevations. �- g. Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. � h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches. �- i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed. j Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. _� k. A-2 Certification; P.E./L.S. Seal. Wk 6. Landscaping plan: 7. Drainage calculations: Zero Runoff Increase per attached.guidelines. 8. Traffic Report: - 2 TOUN OF SOUTH -WINDSOR ID:203-644-3781 F 263 644 "37si� No .005 P .08 �! 9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales l inch to 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. L- b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage. L- C. Sight line at driveway & street intersections. _L-- d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. L-- e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material. f. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. +� g. Metropolitan District Commission,datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls. 17ie Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes, including elevations, sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. N 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: Por sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. I A 11. Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. 17he report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems; the report should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points: NIA a. General nature and development of surrounding area. N b. Topography and natural drainage pattern. NA c. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level conditions, ledge rock, and general nature of soil. WA d. General description of type of development contemplated, e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various ground conditions, materials to be used, and the general layout pattern to be used, etc. N/A f. Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. N/A g. map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout. NZ h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers. - 3 - TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID :203-644-3781 F 203 644'3781 No .005 P.09 i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4.13.5. All info aired above is included in this ap lication at the time of submission. x « (01 DATE May 17, 1995 -4 - FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION Planning Comments �. Key Map surrounding property owners within 500 feet must be identified curb cuts on surrounding properties must be shown 2. Zoning Table total acreage of the lot should be indicated �✓ open space requirement should be addressed(if applicant is proposing a fee in lieu of open space, an appraiser should be submitted for approval by the PZC) 3. Plot Plan the status of Parcel B must be addressed ✓ the drainage easement from the Priests to RSK-Kellco should be delineated on the plans 4. Landscaping Plan Karl Reichle, Tree Warden has suggested that the street tree planted be a Norwegian Maple(a summary sheet has been enclosed) Police Services Sgt. Mike Ritter has expressed a concern about a possible traffic problem turning left to exit Fieldstone, and also turning left from northbound Sullivan Ave. during peak hours. WPCA WPCA approval is required . Sewer easement will require construction of the gravel access road using a geofabric meeting Town requirements. There should be no structure within the easement. The cross country line should include water tight manholes. The laterals should be shown on the plans. Plans should show slopes of pipe. Provide detail of the manhole connection(new manhole) on Pierce Road. This will be an outside drop manhole. Plans should include invert elevations of the future road. Clay stops should be provided on the main line. IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW GROUP MEETING 8/30/96 Staff present: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Mike Gantick, Director of Public Works Mel Stead, Superintendent of Streets Karl Reichle, Superintendent of Parks &Grounds Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer Fred Shaw, Superintendent of Pollution Control Jeff Folger,Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer Mike Ritter,Traffic Unit, Police Services Appl. #96-57P--Petersen Pumpkin Stand. • May need ConnDOT approval; applicant should check with DOT. • Due to the very temporary nature of this request, applicant can clearly delineate the designated entrance and parking area; additional parking area site work may not be necessary. Coordinate with Town staff. Entranceway markings must not create sight line obstructions. Appl. #96-53P--Recyclers Inc. Recycling containers storage area expansion. • Wetlands mitigation will be needed(goal is 1:1 mitigation) • Screening may be needed Appl. #96-58P--Fieldstone Subdivision. • Sight line?What measurement criterion was used? Should be either design speed or 85th percentile traffic speed. Desirable sight line distances will be expected to be met, rather than minimum sight line distances, due to the extremely busy nature of Sullivan Avenue. • Sidewalk should be shown on north side of new street for snow melt • Drainage rights need to be shown • Anticipated stormwater velocities as shown in the accompanying drainage study are high and are of concern • Water velocity at drainage outlet onto Priest propertyis high; outlet treatment needs to be expanded to accommodate the high flows • Lot-to-lot drainage needs to be addressed • Temporary slope rights needed along road stub • The gravel access road over the cross-country sewer line will be need to be constructed with care due to unstable soil conditions and high groundwater. Same for sewer line under private driveway • Extreme care will be required during the installation of the:;ewer connection at Pierce Road due to unstable soils,high groundwater • Concern re: angle of connection of new sewer to existing line in Pierce Road • Concern re: new easement to Town for sewer to be constructed under existing structures, pavement(structures,pavement are prohibited over sewer easements) • High groundwater concerns • Disposition of Parcel B? • Street trees: Karl Reichle recommends use of Norwegian Sunset Shantung Hybrid Maple, will work with developer in securing this tree type Norwegian Sunset Shantung Hybrid Maple AC xx NS Acer tnincatum x A. platanoides `Kelthsform' P.P. 7529, trademarked Height: 35' to 45' (3'5' at age 30) Width: 25' to 35' (25' at age 30) Handiness Zone: 4 to 8 Crown: upright ovate, medium texture Foliage: 3" to 6", glossy dark green, orange red to red in fall Flowers: greenish=yellow Fruit: 11/2" samara Description: A naturally occurring hybrid of Shantung maple and Norway maple selected in Oregon for fall color, branching, and fast growth. Has uniform branching and crown shape. In- troduced in 1989. Advantages: Has brighter fall colors and finer branching than Norway maple.The parentage suggests the mature size will be smaller than Norway maple and more heat tolerant. Limitations: None known yet.Mature size is uncertain.Refer to Acer platanoides for possible problems. Site and Culture: Transplants readily.Tolerates partial shade and a wide range of soils, pH, heat, drought, ®1 and pollutants. Notes: 3r IFJ � lid? 1JF ©1993 by The Pennsylvania State University. Municipal Tree Restoration Program,School of Forest Resources, Penn State.University, University Park, PA 16802 RSK SULLIVAN AVE DETENTION The storm runoff for the proposed development would be piped directly to the Podunk River just downstream of Pierce Road. Based on "Natural Drainage Basins in Connecticut" prepared by Natural Resources Center of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, the watershed area of the Podunk River at the point in question is 2,590 acres. The area of the proposed development is 9.5 acres. Because of this large difference in areas, the site drainage could have no significant effect on peak flows in the Podunk River. A TR-20 computer run was done for peak flows for 10 and 25 year storms in the Podunk River with the present site and the developed site. As the attached calculations show, there is no change in the 10 year flow (814.6 cfs) and 0.1 cfs decrease in the 25 year flow (1100.2 to 1100.1 cfs). If detention was used, the peak flow from the site would be reduced, but the peak would occur closer to the peak in the Podunk River and would theoretically increase the peak flow in the river. Therefore, we recommend that detention not be used for the proposed site. 96248\Al\7000\GJM0701A.WP Corres. PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT I* Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consuiting Engineers BY {p BY �Z,S �� (,aGLtVa4 N AvG-, SHEET NO f Of 7 z: ------ WV- r- r — — -- 6w i� Li --h--- —�-- -- —j 4. - c -�• x w s=_ Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) - Project 1` S-k, 'BY Date��Z�-4� Location J 1poL{r+ [VK R � Checked Dace Circle one: P RDeveloped i Circle one: cthrough subarea NOTES: Space -for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. ' Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. - Surface description (table 3-1) ............ 2. Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L .(total L '< 300 ft) .......... ft 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in �+�_S 5. Land slope, s .............................. ft/ft t d U 0.007 (nL)0.8 Q 6. Tt - P 0.5 $0.4 Compute Tt ...... hr U + 2 . Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved'or unpaved) ..... U A 8. Flow length, L ft - f 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft �6)a44 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ft/s liz L �/ " - 11. Tt 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr • '} ' Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Netted perimeter, p ............. ... ft W. 14. Hydraulic radius, r - 8 Computer ft p _ w 15. Channel slope, s ft/ft •-16.. Hanning's roughness coef f:,•n- 17. .V 1.49 r2/3 s1/2 Compute•V•....... ft/s`= .8. Flow length, L ...... ft [nL+E:d . 19. ,T - L 3600 v c Compute Tt ...... hru 20. - Watershed or subarea ? or T. .(add Tt..in steps 6, 11, 'and 19) . hr C. ._ - (210-VI MS5,Second Ed.,4une 1986) Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or-travel time (Tt) .Project i`� ~ �+i le°xP A �vp- By aT1""t Date , �p Location �� ��.1°"' �$.�{� Checked Date Circle one: Presen Develo Circle one: Tc Tt rough subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............ L 'N 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) �Z-y 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft �• D 4. Two—yr 24--hr rainfall, P2 .................. in ?al 5. Land slope, s .............................. ft/ft •ds 0.00 (nL)0.8 3�-1 + t 3� 6. T . 0.4 Compute Tt hr 2 P 05 s Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... 8. Flow length, L ............................. ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s 4 rL 11. T L Compute Tt ...... • hr �L� + = t r t 3600 V Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw ....................... ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r a Compute r .....:. ft�, p w 15. Channel slope, s ........................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n .............. 1.49 r2/3 a1/2 17. V a n Compute V ....... ft/s 18. Flow length, L ft 19. T = L Compute Tt ...... hr + = t t 3600 V �,. 20. Watershed or .subarea Tc. or Tt :(add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19) hr V . - u (210-VI T8 55, Second Ed , June 1986) " ,- - - Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project 1`s K ^ �loG t'b�b�+'�i'1. 14y. By C7AIL Date r Location 7``d 451`i�t Checked Date � •� Circle one: Pr ent Developed Circle one: Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............ 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) ft (� 4. Two-yr 24 hr rainfall, P2 in 5. Land slope, s .............................. ft/ft 0� 6. T = 0.007 (nL)0.8 Compute Tt ...... . hr •3� + '� Tt P 0.5 s0.4 2 Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 1 ' ram, 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... U 8. Flow length, L ............................. ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ..................... ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s 11. T L Compute Tt ...... . hr 1f 6)(0 + ll�� t 3600 V Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... £t2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r - a p Compute r .....:. ft�, w 15. Channel slope, s ........................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n ..... 1.49 r2/3 sl/2 17. V = n Compute V ....... ft/s 18. Flow length, L ............................. ft 19. Tt = 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr } 20. Watershed or subarea T or T :,(add T in-:steps 6, 11, and 19). ....... .br � . c t t - `` (210-VI-TR-55,:Second Ed., June 1986) ASK X SEZZ` �d l fibs' pb�vNk Ewer? �5EL D 4Z AXIS?. 1T� X S�L-T 0 0.3 i s �L"t' db�. �CSCL t b/> l + 66 Z S CCL'T 0 0 6 X S Z-L7 oa 3s -6b- a . r, _ INLET STATION AND OFFSET ® L,� N TIME TO INLET AREA IN ACRES N y : s NI RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 'r JcJ e 1�� Ja A I � V\ p P s rn SUM OF Al TOTAL Al OD RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.t N M IJ 5` . ,j W Q TO INLET d O x o GRADE OF GUTTER CROSS SLOPE - OF SHOULDER DEPTH OF FLOW oQ 4: vi <D AT GUTTER Irl w WIDTH OF FLOW � e Q BYPASSING INLET q L,� Fr AI BYPASSING INLET s a • s - � s Al ENTERING CATCH BASIN )��° f oN 133HS AS 03H03H0 W2l1d 13381S 31V0 A803NJIS30 103rO8d I Z IN6077 SISA-IbNV MO'lJ a31166 80SONIM Hinos J0 NMO1 �O PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers BY -7/ BY 251 SHEET NO. r of y . 3 ,k .. (/� j+fir,. LL — -- - - — i { L J : v�ft� .771 � `s -- -- f 8 AL _ - -- - i FO-#110 ZORN ► PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers BY '* BY t� } SHEET NO.0f i{ - - - _ -_ --- -__ -;_ 17)• y �} ^ , i . 1 d ass ' - +� - --- - ; - - 38'> At L - ' - 64 - -- - - - FO-#110 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSORT STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN FORM 2.2 PROJECT DESIGNED BY DATE STREET FIRM �. CHECKED BY SHEET No Ly U, 10 - - — — 4 M 831VMOd3H r f r f A1I3ddV3 11nd M A110013n 30V83n17 3d01S = — '~ 3did 3o HION31 3ZIS 3dld. 0 �I✓g �� W3ISAS NI O co A.LISN31NI 11ddNIV8 I` W31SAS NI Id do Wns NISV8 HOIVO ONI831N3 Id 3W11 031V lnWnOOd v o r p — '" � 3did NI 310411 13-INI 01310411 (V 1N3W03S 3N I1 — f -� .Q -52- RSK - SULLIVAN AVE DETENTION The storm runoff for the proposed development would be piped directly to the Podunk River just downstream of Pierce Road. Based on "Natural Drainage Basins in Connecticut" prepared by Natural Resources Center of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, the watershed area of the Podunk River at the point in question is 2,590 acres. The area of the proposed development is 9.5 acres. Because of this large difference in areas, the site drainage could have no significant effect on peak flows in the Podunk River. A TR-20 computer run was done for peak flows for 10 and 25 year storms in the Podunk River with the present site and the developed site. As the attached calculations show, there is no change in the 10 year flow (814.6 cfs) and 0.1 cfs decrease in the 25 year flow (1100.2 to 1100.1 cfs). If detention was used, the peak flow from the site would be reduced, but the peak would occur closer to the peak in the Podunk River and would theoretically increase the peak flow in the river. Therefore, we recommend that detention not be used for the proposed site. 96248\Al\7000\GJM0701A.WP Corres. QQ FUSS&O'NeilI Inc. Consulting Engineers PREPAC BYRED �DATE CHEBYKED DATE PROJECT Iti SHEET NO of st Vi — i 1 ! r — - +— i his i , 1 • - A 77 1 .a• Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project 1` SK"Sv IVoK ' l'�w .By Date Location J ��la N N{�. �i`� � .Checked Date ' Circle one: P sent Developed i Circle one: c Tt through subarea NOTES: Space -for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. ' Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to TC.only) Segment ID 1. - Surface description (table-3-1) ............ { 2. Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) .. • �7 3. Flow length, L .(total L '< 300 ft) .......... ft �60 - 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, in 5. Land slope, S .............................. ft/ft d V 0.8 6_ Tt _ 0.007 (n P 0.5 s0L).4 Compute Tt hr + 2 . Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved-'or unpaved) ..... V I 8. Flow length, L .............................. ft 2�� 9. Watercourse slope, a ....................... ft/ft 1�a 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/6 G z L i 11. Tt 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr • 5 + Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Netted perimeter, p ....................... ft W. _ -- - -- - 14. Hydraulic radius, r pw8 Compute c ft p 15. Channel slope, s ........................... ft/ft �( - _ ..16.. Manning's roughness coef:f. •n 1.49 r2/3 a1/2 17. -V - V Compute ft/s 11 n - j 18. Flow length, L ft L - 19 Tt 3600 V Compute T. ...... hr + u,b .20. Watershed or subarea T or T� (add Tt in steps 6, 11, -and 19) ... 'hr ' .- c _ ��g7 ,.. .- ,. .._. '. _..�, .i .s:t-YA �«` -,_•^.,. .�y'•... ,.,mow. -�f_ _ — 1210-V I-TM5,Second Ed.,-June 1986� -.D Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) `� 5 I.t� ` t 'Q' Date t0 Z i Project ( �'°A�� U { By J � Location a.• �$ {� Checked Date .� Circle one: Presen Develo Circle one: Tc Tt rough subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............ L 'N 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft Z D 4. Two—yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in 5. Land slope, s ft/ft t© 6. T = 0.007 (nL)0'8 Compute Tt ...... hr +3�� + a •3� t P 0.5 s0.4 2 Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID sue, 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... PAIr�� 8. Flow length, L ............................. ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s 4�� 11. T L Compute Tt ...... • hr �L` + _ t 3600 V Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw ....................... ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = pa Compute r .....:. ft�, w 15. Channel slope, s ........................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n .............. 1.49 r2/3 sl/2 17. V - n Compute V ....... ft/s . 18. Flow length, L ............................. ft 19. Tt L 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr + _ . ' 20. Watershed_or .subarea T or .T (add Tt in,steps_6, 11, -and 19) ...._... hr • c , . n. r (210 VI,TR-55, Second Ed, June Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project C,t 1 �'1�(��L Ay' ay �/� Date � { Location 1 �``�' LS i k Checked Date � � �l Circle one: Pre ent Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 5. Land slope, s ft/ft "O 6. T 0.007 (nL)0.8 Compute Tt ...... hr •3,& + a _ t P .0.5 s0.4 2 Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... U N 8. Flow length, L ............................. ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft +04 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s 11. Tt 3600 V Compute Tt ......* hr + t , Channel flow Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, P. ....................... ft 14. Hydraulic -radius, r - a Compute r ....::. ft�' p + w 15. Channel slope, s ........................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n .............. 1.49 r213 s1/2 17. V - a Compute V ....... ft/s 18. Flow length, L ............................. ft 19. Tt 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr + 20. WatersFhed or subarea T -or T ..(add T♦♦ in -steps 6, 11, and 19). ....... hr e (210-VI-TR-55,-Second Ed., June`1986) - ,svv + oo z73 S X 9 0 0 1.73 S X Z 99 + a0 1.7�7SX hqQ al Q WQ44 qZl d E-0 0 17-a S7 A 31-1 y 'LSI X3 `Z 0 0 173S X XNrig4d .S�IJa 1470 17791 X No� s� n1�. gnS �s � Ni:5 viHi Ni S81: f �U QNv3 -� Ll-ST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HIM01 J08 TR-?V RKLPRINT SUMMARY N0PLOlS TITLE 001 RSK SULLIVAN AYE. 96-248A) 5 RAlNFL 3 .2V 8 0,0 V.0V2 0.0V4 V.006 01V08 8 V.VN 0.012 0.014 0.N6 0.V18 8 0.00 0,022 0.624 V.027 0.V29 R 0.031 11,.V134 V.10@ 0.038 0.041 8 0.V4J V.046 0.V49 O.V51 O.V54 R 0.V57 0.060 0.06J 11.666 0.069 8 V,O72 V.V75 0.079 V,082 01085 8 V.V89 0,V9J 0.VY7 V.0J 0.109 8 V.)15 V.12) 0.127 0.134 0.1140 8 O.148 0.\55 0.163 0,171 0.00" O 0.M 0.i99 0.2N O.2 2'27- V,2?.Ir ' 8 V.� �� 0. 6 V.�� V.JO V..7 A3 8 0.500 0.689 0.714 V.�R 8 0.751 0.7A6 0,779 0.790 0.8N1 9 0,8U 0.821 V.829 0.�8 V.P 455 � 8 0.853 0.860 0.867 V.04 0.880 � 8 0,886 V.so-, 0.898 0.90.1 0.9010 � R V.9U 0.915 V.919 V,�4 0.925 8 0.929 0.9-12 0.9315 0.938 0.941 D 0.944 0.946 0.949 0.952 0.9.5 5 B 0.9 55J V.�� V.�J V.�5 0.�J 8 0.969 0.972 0.974 0. 76 0.978 8 0.981, V.983 V.�� 0.987 M89 8 0.991. 01991) M95 0.997 0.990 8 M, 1.0 9ENDTBII 6 RUNOFF 1 VV\ i 4.V5 60.0 J..9 { 1 \ 6 RUNOFF 1 002 2 .015 75.V .44 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 003 3 .015 80.0 .25 l < l 6 AUDHYD 4 VIA 1 2 4 1 \ { 6 RUNOFF \ 005o 5 4.05 60.0 L9 { 1 6 ADDHYD 4 006 J 5 6 ENDAT A 7 lNCREM 6 .10 7 COMPUT 7 VV\ 006 V.V 4.8 1.0 J ? 01 N ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 V0l 06 0,0 5.4 L0 J 2 01 25 ENDCMP l EN0OR2 ********ee****e****e*******END OF 80-80 Vie. ^n- f 5 RSK SULLIVAN AVE, 2148n' JOB 1 PASS 1 tK %Fu l.b-__., 9az i_.44 n„=. ,J_,1:-AN As96-i na�1 REV PC 09/8.3(,21 PAGE EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCRFM MAIN TIM INCREME = i} HOURS ra3 t., . i H_ ,� RFCOR71 - FYECI;TIVF CONTROL OPFRATION CUMPUT FROM SFCTIUN 1 TO SFCTiON 6 RFCORII IG STARTING TIME _ A6 RAIN DEPTH = 4.80 RAIN 3iiRATIC'N= i,t)n RAIN TABLE NO,= ? ANT, MOIST, COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM NOx=10 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 1 OUTPUT HYDROBRAPH= 1 AREA= 4tO5 59 MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 60. TIME OF CONCENTRATION= 1,90 HOURS INTERNAL HYFtROSRAPH TIME INCREMENT= 0974 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS1 PEAK uISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK FLEVATION(FEET) 1.3,52 812,20 (RUNOFF) it f i7,49 ! 5CC1 TIME(HRSi FIRST HYUROC;RAPH POINT = Ofi HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 1t? HOURS i}RAINA(sF AREA = 4,t)5 Su,MI, 1i.Ot? DiSCHS tJ(} 011 CIO on 3[} 94 2<50 E,t"; 12,Q( 0TCr.HF 1`,08 ??. 1t 60,94 100,67 153,07 218x51 1196,23 352,$0 477-40 55ri,3 13101 T}ISCHh 634,84 698.45 747x93 782,84 s(13,86 'i1,96 8(}°,5"� 7R5,t}8 772.62 74z,3fi 4, rt' T;CH aC6,71 6_,8 a 4 �9$,tf c n ^�n a =a = 488.69 _i.. vv z_ G '} 6 F: 8 63i,1} 5L.6,8L. =9 .; 5 44, "1 da5_?4 c).x..,,+. 7_J..J.J 15,00 uISCHS 425,67 4}7,48 .39?,7u 375,17 360,73 .347,37 334,97 323,47 312.76 302x78 16.00 DISCHI G 293,56 .10,5,tit: 27„07 269,49 ^, L3 � � n � 2, n n 31^ 3.0..,,,•. _5 e9t: i49,hf �43,ra i•:stle?.J 2•rLx56 17,Ot} uISCHS 22^.7.0$ ?21,61 216,iIi 21t7x48 2t4,75 198,86 192x84 1186,76 180,70 174,75 18,0fa DjSCHG 168,95 63,29 a57 80 t-^ h a 9 43 " 1' ?5 , �n l,._ axe. i , 3 ,47.8 1. .,n;. 1,?9 1.36,23 173,01 ;..,.,,.85- 19. }1} DISCHS 127."S i"4,6' 122,03 119,`S 117,79 115,14 1- t'R(° 111 3, ,t, _i}9,1�1 tt37,,,5 20',00 1)ISCNt; 1i15,75 11 04,3P t7-,i6 1021m03 iool _ 99,t,•, 98,7r 97,72 96t66 9t_U.- 21,00 DISCHS 94,64 93,67 92x 72 9i x 7.`3 90.73 89169 S8,t.0 97,75 Sh,93 56,1 DISCHE 85,738 84,67 R 25 a^ a^ '6 9 n 4 _3,9ti 8.. Ra-75 na 39 r1, 9 n ..._. Ll i.,bt UL,1 _.. Utx•_ J!, :.,f,4t1 ' 79.2; 78,57 77,9. ?7 -j 76 6n ?8 75,36 74,5t) 73,79 79,R ," r f, 70,: 24,00 P,TRCH% 77,57 73,76 74,09 74,55 32 7'.4a ^ �" �8 ,' 4f' 4 6 77,62 78,, ta, 76,38 P,ISCHG 73 ° 0,5 ;, ' ^ ? 7.44 4^_,53 '7,`1 0, 60 0 7' 't 66,be 6_ t.9 5 r,20 52, _9 4 '6100 DISCHS '28,2? 24,70 67 a^ n LO t, _ ,.,.xt,t r,9, 16,60 14.73 13,61 11,4.3 10100 8,77 27,1'" DISCHS 7,72 6.78 5.95 5,22 4,518 4,02 3,51 3,i17 n ' 20x0 TiISt",His ?,tib 1.B0 1,58 1,38 1.si.+ 1104 191 ,79 LP 9 r: 29,t}ti 11 T S C.HS 433 37 '' 27 .23 19 .15 109 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = i.,2! WATFRSHE" TNCHF5, 1140,07 CFS-HRS. 259,5i} Ai:,RE-FEET; BASFFI.ON = C}C} CF5 OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 2 OUTPUT HYOROSRAPH= 2 AREA= 01 69 M INPUT RUNOFF Ci aE= 75, ?j� nr PO CENT N= a IRd_.- F .1 t_N RATIO ,4 HOURS INTERNAL. HYUROJBRAPH TIMF INCREMENT= 0587 H E Rr".: PCAK TIME(HRS) PEAK OISCHARSF(Ci•S) PEAK FI_EVArTION(rEEii 12.34 15,x.., (RUNOFF) THO XED 042806 15:44 RSK SULLIVAN AVE, 96-248A1 pus 1 u c .I,1� 5 _ REV PC 09183(.2) PAGE 2 TIME{HRS) FIRST HYURROGRAPH POINT = ,00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 01 SQ.MI. 9.00 D ISI:HG .00. 101 02 104 7 09 1111 c 10,00 DISCHO 1.+.9 .21 .24 .28 .32 .36 .40 145 151 17 11.00 OISMS 164 .72 .00 ,90 1103 1.20 ,.,4t+ '^ 104 ^_.,3.n ,7 3,5F€ 12 o DISCHG 6108 9147 12.88 15,00 14.53 1182 10,13 184 6.12 4,94 13,00 DIEN c16 A61 3.21 2.97 168 147 2 gi_+ 113 102 01 89 ' 8' 1.74 1.67 109 124 L 4 R.,4€? !coo i 51:H3� 1, r ,..,.r.� 3.7 ti + - + �•'} i a +e , O(i 07"%H lob .,36 1,34 1,31. 1,28 106 _,25 1,24 ;.,20 1,16 1 .00 1.07 1,04 ,99 .95 .91 16.00 DISCHS 1.12 1,+{C t. ,09 ,€?P t + !too DISCHS .84 .75 .70 .69 .70 .70 .60 E3 .60 RIO 10.00 DISCHS .SCR .63 .63 .61 .58 ,57 16 .55 .55 .55 1100 ^ISUG .55 .54 .51 .47 .46 140 151 53 20,0€1 DISCHS 50 .47 ,46 .47 147 ..45 .45 47 .47 44 21.00 DISCHS .41 .40 .42 .45 .46 .44 .41 .39 130 19 22.00 DISCHS .41 .45 .46 .44 .41 .39 '38 138 .37 _37 rSCH 7 .37 37 3 .3. 23.€�(t I)t�3,EiG ,37 ,37 .37 .37 . . r� � ,1s a5 24,00 BISCHG 43 8.3 65 ,39 nn .13 ' z4 A^ 25.00 DISCHS .01 A! '00 RUNCiFF YRUME ONE BASHUN = L31 WATERSHED INCHES, m35 CFS-HRS, 1,85 ACRE-FEET, P+ASEFLt3W = .00 CFS OPERATION HI+Nifl=F CROSS grtr•O.• 3 OUTPUT HY?:ROGRAPH= 3 AREA= .01 BE MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 80, TIME OF CONCENTRATION= e25 HOURS INTERNAL HYDR1IGRAPH TIME INCREMENT= .0333 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK 1)ISCHAR E CFS: PEA+. ELEVATION(FEET) 1.2.23 TIAME ,"tS) FIRST HY tiOBRAPH POINT = ,00, HOURS TIMEINCREMENT 10 HOURS 1RnTNAOE AREA - ,ctl ^,t?.M,, 7.00 DISCHF .0(i I rt€J 00 tit Do 00 .00 ,00 ,^fit 01 8.00 CtISCHG .03 04 �(" 07 09 .10 ,13 15 .15 17 o Or! 7TcrHr l 24 25 27 .€1 .33 136 .39 14.3 47 10,€0 OISCHG 149 , 3 ,58 164 70 ,76 °? ,90 ,98 1,07 ii,%t0 DISCHS 1119 1.30 1,40 1156 1,85 2,12 2.44 3,16 4,68 7.65 12,00 DISCHS 1170 1127 20.91 2W 21 1.4.i8 +tt,45 � 39 f u r. r.2(r .,,39 4... 3,2{ €) nr 5 1 8 s 1 2. 1 ,,44 2, 5 .1A 7. 10 2,0_ i3.0. �,SCHt; 3,4, �.20 ",9 �,8 6 ,r +. c 14,00 DISCHG 1198 1193 101 1,85 1,69 ',6,, 137 1.64 1,49 1,43 Er 15,00 UISCH 1.4r, 1149 1,42 1,31; 1.36 1.,3E 1,36 1.33 1.75 1_^it 16,00 I)ISCHG 1.:i8 + 17 1 17 ' +' , + ' +,.... ,,, a,.tr 1.,`� _.�4 _.06 A,ci,. 39 .9: ,, n L �_ 68 '3 6. 62 6t� 63 r.E,(f+7 DTSCHG 5 ..i ,76 ,78 .5 7 1e,00 I}ISCH6 71 73 66 62 w6o 60 1159 .59 159 '9 19.00 RISCHG 159 56 48 .46 52 57 59 .59 1596 20,00 DISCHS 48 '46 _ ' '' .54 .47 .46 .�3 ,54 .47 .42 21,00 DISCHS 41 43 R2 54 47 43 41 .4ti .40 43 72,00 DISCHS .52 ,54 .4•7 143 ,4% ,40 ,40 ,40 ,4C' ,o 23.00 DISCHS ,4ti 40 140 .Ott .40 40 40 .14 J.6 ,?a TR?O XFO 06-29-96 15:44 RStt SULLIVAN AVE. 96-249A1 is 1 pus 1 REV PC 09193{.2) PARE 3 't 0 IK 1 „ 3n 26 i ,>] r.tF!.#'1tJ' ,t�, 1.. +r .71. ,!_'.L ,eo .t}4 At .iE!i RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE R SEF O = 75 SED INCHES, c ?6 59 r=n HRS nr FELT c i OW = S is ABOVE i_i•i iL, 1� %,l �A�t:�'1J t.._. L�t:r�1; .. i N ,,J— j .._,�1I nle��—! _!� f7A 1FF tJ N7 r nt+ it J MENTION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 4 INPUT HYDROGRAPHS= 1,2 U PUT HYDR ORA,PH= 4 PEAK TIMF(HRS) PEAT: nISCHARRF(CFS) PEAL; E F4'ATION{FFET) 1152 814.63 (NULL) 24.71 78,36 {,lilt_#_) TIME{HRS) PINT HURL RAPH POINT = tOO 'HOURS TIME INCREMENT = to HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 4,07 Sn,MI, 9.00 DISCHS 106 lilt .02 .04 .05 .01 109 j1 .14 ,tu 10,00 OISCHR 119 .21. .24 _28 .32 .36 40 .45 151 .57 11,00 1)I SCHO .64 .72 .80 .90 1,04 1.29 L12 MR 4.94 1127, a? IS 7a a 7� i 7 a i ^ j 7. 39164 53 56 32 ,. .00 ff;.�i~,HB ::,..�6 42,u3 .,9_ 1,.'i,6 ,.67,91 ,3 ,3.3 .+06.36 _ 47Ri,. ,�; t 63n 0 70 i 74 i 7 e 76 006 54 014,.43 91 n' 7 ^4 A, 3i :s.3,C:0 OISChG ,!„r,t1._ ,t.2.,76 r:!1.15 !S_,, .,� , u1,;,:_j ,97„., 774,64 7 4,.J:. t4,00 0I,>:Ht; 708.60 670,71. 633,93 599,74 6R,55 54ii,jl7 514,09 49121. 467,R2 446.74 Co ISM F2 03 4.R.n4 39 .05 376. R 362.01. 345.6•. h 2 ?? � c 15,:.:. 15,,.,HS {..;. ,,, jl aJ 2_ 4 3 .33:,2" _4,7.t .13,9 30194 16,00 MSCHG 29C 60 296,1:j 77R,16 270.73 263,71 257.04 75173 244.7E 23105 23147 17,Olt_ i13CHR 227.92 2 7 37 716,90 N I 2 j n a 39 i 1 7L r �.:.�...! ..,...,18 ,._5.45 :.9.,56 1.93.J2 1R7,.J, 191..30 sr,,.34 1.9.00 019CHO 16655 163,92 1.5L 44 153,24 14R,47 14C 19 14130 1.36,79 13156 0166 ..r.: R 5 14 1 54 1 1 1.9."}tt Il;�,��; .2i,..7 i�w•.,_ . `27 1^' 05 9.1.7,i5 ;.i,:1,62 ti3,59 t.t.°t,6. 10471 1t)7,97 :'0.00 DISCHO 29 1 4.85 10162 rn i 10129 ^ i 1- t _ ,, t06,��.J i3._,.31 ,ti1.39 99.2� 99,s9 97...;, 9,„t)9 �a fi: DI r S r, 08 9' i n1 20 1 � f, 7 n n 15 7 a ' 9_.i.� P.:, fry P R ,31 „6.54 ci,t+[; il.e..�, .? ..,.,+5 .4,,ty ...r,J.4 i.,st, 9:•,1 ... Li.!.L•.i ._! 22,00 t7ISCHR 85,79 R5.77 84,36 83,69 9108 9155 P° 13 R1,77 9s 7 5 ,JJ Lr.., t,.:,,�,, RO,R,� t t itT- r n 7 6 7n -+t �! -�• ?3-(C: Hr ;,0.'`� 9,:'9 7 ,94 t j 77,67 7;,06 76.45 ;.,,r;. 74,7R �.03 �J 00 8 8 7 1� 7 n? 7S 7S i � 7�5 35 L ',4„� O ..t.H>; 4,{.t1 74,51 !4, ,;. �,_.2ti '1 '6,61i ,,75 !r 77,9 7_,41j 25.00 1ISCHR 73.99 7157 66.67 62M 57,20 57.79 47,44 4153 37,51 3160 2L 00 DISCHR ^n 27 7g 70 2117 1199 s E cn 14 3 tool d j i 00 n 77 Vr+. iI 1+� ii!e ,1 ,.. L.!.,�U 1 ,� L•..t}1 j.. ••; �,�.1_}i) +1, ! 2100 1)ISt,HS „2 6.7B 5.95 3.22 4,5B CA? 151 L07 i:,69 1 Mt 29,00 €aISCH6 2.06 1180 1159 1130 1.20 1.04 At 19 AR 159 29.00 DISCHR 50 ,43 37 32 ,77 .23 ,19 ,15 ,i.7 109 nUPd.,rF V,+t.aJ'tE ABOVE ;tAS,_;t.t3N - 1.21 W^TE„S#'<.0 INCHF,!, 3,.614 t,,.,-.,,•.:} 261,39 A}..9:..-Ft.r,.tg RA?.r1.0W _ ,00 t:F OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SFCTION OUTPUT HYRROORAPH= 5 AREA= C 05 90 HI INPUT Ri;OFF CURVE= 60, TIME OF CONCENTRATION= 1,90 HOURS INTERNAL HYDn O9RAPH TT NF INCREMENT= 094 HOES PEAK i j, _ a PEAK )%SCH n SE(CF R) PEAK F_FJ T tOU(FEFT) 13.5? 012.20 (RUOFF) 2 Mi 70,^n (R rOF ) RUNOFF a. .{ME AROVF r A5EF OW = 1.20 WATERSHED INCHES, 3140,1' CFS-1O',. 25-9.90 ^fPF FFF. . NA^ F_{i 0 -FS TR20 XFQ 042846 15'44 RSK SULLIVAN AVE. 96,748Ai JO8 1 PASS 1 REY PC 09/83(.2) PAU 4 OPERATION ADDHYS CROSS SECTION 6 INPUT HYDROGRAPHS= 3,5 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH= 6 PEAK TlNE(HKS) PEAK UTSCHARGE(CFS) PEAK Fi[VAT0N(FEET) 5.52 814.60 (NULU 24.711 78.29 (NULU TlM[(HRS) FIRST HYDVOG8APH POINT = .N) HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 4.07 SQ.Ml. 7.00 8lSCHO .OV .00 .00 .00 .0V .VV .VV .0V .VV At 8.O0 DlSCHG .VJ .04 .V6 .07 .09 ,N .O .|5 .15 .>7 9.0V DlSCH8 .21 .24 .25 .27 .JV .33 .J6 .39 .47 10.00 8lSCHG .49 .53 .58 ,64 .70 .76 .83 .YV .98 1.07 U.O0 8lSCHG 1.19 \.JV 1.44 1.56 1186 ?.?V 2.74 C09 7.0 14.J1 12.00 DlSCHG ?9.58 51.29 81.85 120.88 167.75 220.95 30143 3B&10 47079 50.22 13,00 DlSCKG W8.29 701.65 750.91 05.65 006.47 8\4.41 810.77 797.22 77C72 744.42 14.00 DlSCHG 709.69 60.81 633.96 599.85 56R.56 540.11 514.21 49134 46J.84 44L77 15.00 0[SCHG 427.15 400.97 397.13 376.55 362.10 340.73 336,33 32C8* MVV 30198 16.OV UlSCHG 294.74 ?Rh.0 70.25 770.82 263.8* 25112 25175 24C77 73109 23148 17.00 DlSCHG 227.83 222,29 216.82 211,25 05.53 199.62 191M IRA J9 ME 175.38 0.00 D{SCHO 169.66 164.02 15147 153.25 1o49 144,21 14134 13L82 13160 130.64 19.00 DlSCHG 127.87 125.17 12151 120.04 117.8l 115.71 1D.67 11 .68 10477 107.95 20.00 07,SCHIG 106.2h 104.84 10169 10%57 1N.39 10129 9430 90.26 M15 9&OR 2L0V 0(SCHG 95.05 94.11 93.24 92.28 91.20 90.11 89.09 88.i6 87.JJ R6.5Y � ?7.00 Dlq C Irl 9 105.90 R"/6 84.37 0.60 ONOB 0157 HL|5 8L79 91.39 Boos 23.00 8l�.H.F OV.27 710 7L97 78.33 M70 MV9 M40 M70 74.67 M17 ?C60 D19 CH 5 74,77 75.14 74.00 74.87 75.47 764S V64 M28 M90 7h.3R 2100 DIMS 7187 7157 66.62 0.09 W20 5129 M44 4153 3151 M60 26.00 D/SCHG 2B,27 24.7V 21.67 18.97 M68 /4.73 1J.N /�43 10.VO 8.77 27.00 DlSCHG 7.72 6.7V 5.95 5.22 4'58 ^.02 3.51 107 2.69 2.36 28.00 DlSCHG 2.V6 1,80 1.58 1.38 1.20 1.04 At .79 .68 .59 2100 DISCHG .5V .43 .37 .32 .27 .23 19 .15 .12 .09 RUNOFF YOLUME ABQV[ BASEFL0W = 1.21 NATERSHFD INCHES, 3166.66 CFS-HRS, 261.69 ACR[ FZT; 8ASFFLUW = .0V CFS FXECUTlVE CONTROl. OPERATION [NDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 RECORD 0 TR?V XFQ 06-28+96 15,44 RSK SULLIVAN AVE, 9h-24SAI JOB 1 PASS 2 R[V PC 09/8342} PAGE 5 H[CUTlVF CONTROL OPERATION COHPU7 FROM XSECT0N 1 TO XSFCT0N 6 K[CUVD 0 STARTlNG TIME = .0V RA7N UFPTH = 5.40 RAN DURAT0N= \.OV RAN TABLE NO.= 3 ANT. MOIST. CON0= ? ALTERNATE NO,= i STORM NO.=25 MAIN TIME INCREMENT HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SFCT0N 1 OUTPUT HYDR0GRAPH` \ AREA` 4.05 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE= 6O. TIME OF CONCENTRATION` 1.90 HOURS lNT[RNAL HYDR0GRAPH TIME lNCREMENT= .0974 HOURS PEAK TlNF(HRS> PEAK DlSCHAK8E(CFS) PEAK FiFYAT0N<FE[T> 13.48 1097.18 (RUMUFF> 74.71 95.47 <KUNDFF) TlME(HR,',) FIRST HYDRUGRAPH POINT = ,VV HOURS TlME INCREMENT ` .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 4.05 SEMI? 11,00 DISCO .00 .02 .N .31 .73 1,55 2.94 5.45 9.89 \R.73 12.00 8lSCHO 35.27 63.15 10,66 Wl! 2M.J1 33432 43L60 55L05 67165 7R&hFj 13,00 DlSCHR 8W.4B 96B4O5 102&94 106186 10101 1ML95 10 8 A,A,4 06.3.2 5 l�,� �.44 14.00 DlSCHG 937.35 979.14 B7.88 780.77 737.88 69R.8D 66133 63171 60125 57l.73 t5.V0 DISCX8 545.0i 520.62 40.05 477.22 457.91 440.08 423.56 40N.29 39m.09 381911 16.00 UISCHR 768.75 357.49 347.07 337.34 37R.15 319.47 311 29 30.58 79A24 09.09 17.00 0{SCHG 2R2.03 275.03 267.98 260.84 253.57 246.12 238.52 230.85 22L23 2i5.75 0.00 DlSCHR 20B.46 201.36 194.49 188.0 19112 17&79 17198 16L60 16L59 159.91 {9.00 DlSCN8 156.46 15J.14 149.94 146.90 144.05 1038 138.82 136.35 13197 13L75 20.0V DISCHG 129.75 12101 126.49 125.09 123.71 12135 171.03 119.77 118.43 11115 71.OV DlSCHG 115.90 U4,69 113.51 11130 111.V4 109.75 1*R.50 107.36 1V6.33 105.37 22.00 UlSPHS 104.41 103.46 10208 1O|,77 1O1.05 10141 99.B9 9144 9&94 9L30 2100 DISCHS 9155 9&75 95.95 95.0 9037 9161 7187 9L9s 9i97 90.04 24.00 1111 SC H R 89.77 99.99 90.19 90.94 91.87 93.22 94.66 9145 94.98 9J.12 25.00 DlSCPS 90.07 S&0 8422 7169 6Y73 6174 5T0 5485 4172 3174 26.00 VlSCHG 34.46 JV.\? 26.41 23,15 20.33 17'95 1v86 13.93 1?.i9 N.69 27.00 D{SCHG 9.41 8.27 7.25 6.36 5.59 4.90 4.28 3.74 3.78 2.87 28.00 DISCHG 2.51 2.19 1.97 1.68 1.46 1.77 1,N ,Y6 .G3 .77 29.00 DISCHG .61 .52 .45 .39 .JJ .28 .23 .19 ,14 ,U RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE B0SEFL0W = 1.56 WATERSHED INCHES, 4076.14 CFS HRR` 336.85 AC8F-FEET.! 8ASFF VW = .VV US � OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 2 UUTPUT HY0R0GRAPH= 2 AREA= .N SQ MI INPUT KUNOFF CURVF= 75, TIME OF CUNCFWTRAT0N= .44 HOURS lNTERNAL HYDR05RAPH TIME [NCR[MENT= .0587 HOURS PEAK TlME(HRS) PEAK VlSCHARGE<CFS> PEAK ELEVAT0N(FEFT) 12.34 18.50 (RUNOFF) TlMF(HIRE) FIRST HYDRVGRAPH POINT = .VV HOUR TIME \NCKEMFNT = .iV H0URS URAlNAGE AREA = .V\ SQ.Ml. 8.00 DlSCHG .VV .00 .0O .O0 .00 .OV .01 .V7 .0J AS TOO XED MOM 15'44 R91f. gN7VAN AVE. 9674M1 ju ) PUS 2 REY PCV90J( ?>' PAR 6 1000 DlSCHG .JJ .36 ,40 .44 .49 .55 At .67 .74 ,81 11.00 DlSCHG 190 110V 1.11 1.23 1.40 1.61 1.O8 2.79 3.04 4.39 l2.V0 DlSCHG 7.68 11.79 15.86 1130 17.9R 1446 \2.1R 9.39 7.32 5.89 1100 DlSCHG E95 C29 3.31 146 3.17 2.92 2.70 2.52 2.39 2,JO 14.0V DTSCHG 2.23 2.16 2.10 2.05 1.97 LP7 1.81 L78 473 1.65 15.00 DlSCHG 1.60 1.59 1.58 1.54 1.50 1.48 1.47 445 \.41 L36 \6,V0 UlSCHG 1132 1.29 1.27 1.26 1.76 125 \.?i l,16 1,17 117 17.0 0 DlSCH8 .9R ,88 .R2 .0 .82 .02 .79 .74 .70 .6R 0.00 DlSCH6 .70 ,73 .74 ,71 .68 .66 .65 25 .64 .64 19.00 D{SCHG .64 .63 .59 .55 .54 .56 .59 of .62 .62 20,00 DISCHG .59 .55 .54 .55 .55 153 .53 ,55 .54 .51 ?l.VV D7SCHG .48 .47 .49 .53 .53 .51 .48 .45 .45 72.08 OISCH6 .40 .57 .53 .51 .48 ,46 .45 .44 ,44 .4J 2100 DlSCHG .43 .43 .43 .43 .43 .K] .«J .41 .32 .79 24.00 DlSCHG .50 .88 ,97 .75 .45 .26 ,/5 .V8 45 .V3 25.00 DlSCHG .02 .N ,N .00 RUNOFF VOLUME A80VF B4S[FLUN = 2.8V WATERSHED lNCHES` 27.12 CPS-HRS, 2.24 ACRF-FFFT; 8ASEFLON = .00 CB OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION J UUTPUT HYDROGRAPH= J AR[0= .01 SQ Ml lNPUT RUNOFF C&RVE= R*. TIME OF CUNCFNl8ATIUN= .25 HOURS INTERNAL HYDRDG8APH TIME lNCR[MFNT= .OJJJ HOURS PEAK TlMF(HRS) PEAK DlSCHARGF(CFS) PEAK Ei[VAT0N(FFFT) � 17.2J 75.02 (RUN0FF> � 24.07 1,64 (RUNOFF) TIM[(HRS) FIRST HYURUGKAPH POINT = .VO HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .!O HOURS DRAlNAW AREA = .V1 SQ.HI. 7.0V 0/SCH8 .00 .00 ,VV .VO .VV 'N .VJ .05 .07 .09 R.VV U}SCHG .0 .l? .14 .1-6 .18 .20 .23 .?6 .7� .?8 9.00 DlSCHG .J4 ,JR .J8 .40 .45 .48 .55 .60 .65 10.00 0/SCHG .68 .73 .79 .86 .94 1.01 ).1V L0 1.?8 1.J� 1,00 DISCHS, 1.54 L67 1,79 LYY ?.J« 2.67 3.06 3.9J 5.79 9.38 12.00 07SCHG 16.61 2\.88 24.89 21.91 \7.30 D.?7 8.44 6.30 5.13 4.49 13.00 DISCHG 4.02 3.73 3.47 3.27 J.04 2 %61 ?.*9 7,4* 2.39 14.V0 UlSCHG 130 124 2.72 2.15 1.96 1.' 1.93 1.9) 1.71 l.66 15.00 DlSCKG 1.72 1.73 1.65 1.60 MR 1.57 1.57 |.54 444 1.39 16.0V DlSCHG 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.36 1,36 1.32 1.22 1.17 1.15 1.07 i7.VV DlSMS .0 .79 .R4 .8R ' .90 .07 `77 .77 .70 .72 18.00 VlSCH6 .R2 .84 .76 .71 .70 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 |Y.0O DlSCHG .69 .65 .55 .53 .61 .66 .68 .68 .69 .65 20.80 D7SCHG .55 .53 .61 .67 .54 .53 01 .62 .54 .49 2LO0 D{SCHG .47 .50 .60 .62 .54 ,49 .47 Ah X .50 ??.OV DISCHG .60 .62 .54 .49 .47 .47 .46 .4h .46 '46 23.00 D{SCH6 .46 .46 ,46 .46 . 6 . A .4A, .JY .\9 .44 24.00 UlSCHG LJO 1.6A .82 '30 A .V4 .O? .VV RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE B&SERUN = J.28 BURNED [NCHES` 31.72 CFS-PRS, 2.62 ACRE-FFFT; 8ASFR0N = .VV CFS / TR20 YF0 06-2g-96 15;44 RSK SUKLlVAIN AVE, 96'?48Al JUR ) PASS ? REV PC 09/8342) PARE 7 OPERATION AUDHYU CROSS SECTION 4 lNPUT HYDROGRAPHS= 1`7 OUTPUT HYDR0GRNPH= 4 PEAK T[ME(HRS) PEAK 8lSCHAR5E(CFS) PEAK [LEUAT0N(FFET) l3.4S 1100.15 (NUU] 24.71 95.54 MEL} TJHE(HRS) FlRST HYDR0GRAPH POINT = An HOURS TlM[ lNrRFMEHT = .10 8OURS DRAlNAGE ARFA = 4.V7 SQ.Ml, 8,O0 U7SCHG An .00 .VV .00 An .00 .01 .07 .VJ .V5 9.VV D7SCHS .07 .VY .0 .O .15 ,18 .2| .23 .26 .38 N,00 D[SCHG ,JJ .J6 .40 .44 .49 .55 .61 .67 .74 .RI 11.00 DlSCH8 .90 1.03 1171 1.53 2,13 3.\6 Co? 7.73 1193 2J.J2 12.O0 OISCHG 42.95 74.94 121.51 )87.41 ?W.29 34A78 45178 5AT44 68L97 79C54 )3.V0 DlSCH8 892.43 977.34 1037.75 1073.32 ME0 1099.97 !0 R 9.J4 1D65.77 10.30.673 985.76 14.0V DISCHA 934,57 8O479 879.90 7B2,82 739.84 700.75 6@.14 02.49 hot 9B 5713R 15.00 WHO W.74 572.21 499.63 470.76 459.4l 441.55 425,03 40173 39150 38127 16.00 D{.9CH5 170.V6 3M.77 MR.7N 3M,fO MY 370.77 3\2.50 30075 797.36 79V.15 17.00 DlSCHG 2M.01 275.91 20.80 261.65 254.39 246,94 23131 23%59 72193 216.43 is,no UlERO 209,16 202.09 195.23 18174 |R .R0 17L46 17L63 160.25 16 .73 1615� 19.00 UISCHG 157.10 15177 150.53 14J.45 {44.59 141.94 139.41 1096 134.60 13137 0.V0 A/R cl H 5 13L34 128.56 127.03 175.64 174.25 1�. S 12115 17177 1I8.97 17,M 21.00 DlSCHG 116.J8 115.16 U4.VV U2.R3 111.57 1I0.25 109.97 M8l 106.78 \V5.82 2?.VV DI9-11HR 10009 10199 10.11 1017R 10102 1OO.R7 1E34 91OR 913R 9474 23.0O VlBOB 97.99 97.18 W3s 95.39 94,80 94'04 9130 9139 91.24 90.3J 2u.00 MEN 90.27 91Hh 91.35 91.69 92.32 93.40 9Cso 9154 95.03 93.15 25.00 DlSCHR 90.V8 8A04 81.27 75,69 6173 6174 57.83 5{.85 45.72 39.74 ?6.O0 DlSCHG 34.46 3117 26.41 73.15 20.33 17.95 1186 13.93 1119 1169 27.00 DlSCHG 9.41 127 7.75 6.36 5.59 C90 u.?8 J.74 128 187 28.VO DlSCHG 7.5> 2.19 l.92 1.68 1'46 1.27 1.0 .96 .B3 '72 29.00 D{SCH8 .61 .52 .45 .JY .33 .28 .23 .19 .1) � RUNOFF VOLUME ABUVE BASFR'UW = 1.56 NAT[RSHFD 7NCHFS, 41V3.26 UWmS, 33109 ACRE-FEFY 80EF UN = An Cps OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 5 00?UT HYDR0GRAPH= 5 AM *.05 SA Ml lNPUT RUNOFF CUKVF= 60. TIME OF rONCENT8AT0N= 1.90 HOU8S lNTERNAL HYDRUGRAPH TIME lHCREMFNT= .0974 HOURS PEAK TlME(HRS) PEAK DlSCHAKGF(CFS) PEAK E|.FVAT0N(FFET) D.48 N97.18 (HUN0Fp) M7< 95.47 (RUN0FF) RUNUFF VOLUME ABOVE BAS[FLUN = }.56 WATFRSHED MCNES` 4O76.)4 CFS'HRS` 7J6.85 AC8FfFET; 8AS[FlOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADUKYV CROSS SFCTlON 6 /NPUT HYDROGRAPHS= 3,5 OUTPUT HYUR0GRAPH= 6 TR2V XFQ OKWA 15:44 PSK RIKOVAN AVE. 96-? PA1 JUB l PASS ? REV PC 09/RJ( 2), PAGE 8 PEAK TlHF(HRS) PEAK DlSCHARSE(CF3) pF0K FiFVAT0N(FBT) 0.48 >1VV.O6 (MRL> 74.71 95.46 (mKU T{N[(HRS) F\RST HYDROGRAPH PONT = .00 HOURS T7ME /NCR[NFWT = .N HOURS DRA/NA6F AREA = 4.V7 SQ.NI, 7.00 UlSCHG .00 .00 .VV .00 no .01 .AJ AS .07 .09 R.00 0SCHG .0 .12 .14 ,16 .18 .70 .23 .26 .26 .2R 9.00 D{SCHG .J* .38 .38 .40 .45 .48 Al .55 .65 1100 DlSCHG .@R .73 .79 ,86 .94 1.01 LN 1.18 L?H ).J9 11.00 VlSCHG 1.54 1.69 1.90 2130 3.07 4.27 6.Vk 9.37 W8 28.11 12.00 0lSCHS 51.RR 05.0 130.55 10107 25161 M3.59 44!05 56135 6RO.79 791/4 O.0V D}SCHG 091,50 971.78 10141 1077.13 tHL05 109179 1N8 9.?6 10A5.74 1DID.68 9R5.86 /4.OA BlSCHR 93404 BRLX R30.0 707,97 73903 700,76 661N 63161 6AlAR 57139 15.00 0ISCHG 546.85 572.34 499.70 478.81 459.49 u41.65 425.13 40187 39,53 3RO.29 16.00 VlSCHG 370.1) 35TH4 34B,47 33E69 179.51 37079 312.51 30075 797.19 79L15 17.00 DlSCHG 787.90 775.81 ME82 761.73 754.47 746.99 73%79 731.57 72192 216.47 18.0V 0lS I'll HG 7(19.28 207.70 195.26 18.74 187.81 177.48 177.66 168.29 164.70 |60.59 19.00 DlSMS 15L15 15179 15149 14L43 14C65 14103 13150 137.03 134.6A 13LAu 70.00 DISCHG 1JV.J0 128.54 17110 125.71 124.25 12187 171.63 170.34 118.97 117.64 21.00 0lSCH8 116.37 U5.19 UN.0 112.97 111.58 110.74 1*197 1082 106.79 \V5.87 27.00 VTSCHG 105.01 IOCV8 103,12 107.2h 101.52 10I88 100.35 9491 99.40 98.76 73.0V DlSCHG 98.01 97.21 96.41 95.62 94.83 94.V7 9J.33 9137 91.0 9109 24.00 DlSCHG 91.15 91.58 91.0 91.24 91.98 9J.26 94.67 95.45 94'98 9117 7.00 U7RE HS 90.07 RA0 8L77 75.69 6173 6174 57.0 51 5 4172 3 .74 Dl�14,S. 14.46 30,17 M.41 73.15 0.33 \7 95 15 86 )J � )2 19 10 m � . . . , . 27.00 0SCHG Y.u1 8.27 7.25 6,J6 5.59 4.90 4.?8 174 J.?R 2.G7 28.00 07SCH8 2.51 7.19 L9? 1.68 1.4A 1.77 LID .96 .83 .77 ?9.V0 D[SCHS 'Al .52 .45 ,JY .33 .?V .73 .19 .14 .1l RUNOFF V0iUME AR0VE BAS[FLOW ` 1,57 WATFRSHED }NCH[S, 4107.86 CFS-HRS` 339.47 ACRF-FF[Q 8AS[FLVN = .V0 CF3 FXFCUT{VE COURfli. 0PFRATlDN ENDCNP CUMP0ATTON8 CUMP [TFD FOR PASS % RFCU80 7D EXECUTIVE CVNTRUi OPERATION FNDJ08 RECUR0 0 TR2V �� V6-?8-96 15,44 RR SNL7HAN AVE. 9h-24RA1 JOB l SUMMARY RFV PC 09/8J(.2) pARF y SUMMARY TARLF I - SRFCTFV HFSULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTlVE CONTROL lNSTRUCTIUNS 7M THE ORDFR PFRrURNEU (4 STAR(*) 4FTFR THE PFAK DlSCHAR8F TlMF AND KATF {CFS) VAiUFS lNDlCATES A FIAT TUP HYDR08RAPH A QUESTION HARK(v> lND}C4TFS A HYVRUGRAPH WITH PEAK AS 1A9T P0lNT.) SIR TlOM/ STANDARD RAIN ANTFC MAlN PVFClPl TAT 0H PFAK UlSCHA8GF STRUrTUR[ CONTROL D8A{NAGE TARL[ MOlST T7NF ------------- RUN0FF ------------------_ /8 0PF8AT0N ARFA � POND 7NCREM BFG{N AM��T ��ATl0N AHDUNT FiFVAT0W TIME RATE RATE <SQ M{) (HR) (HR) (}N> (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) <CFS) (CSH> XS[CTl8N 1 RUNU�F 4.V5 3 ? .1V .0 �.8V 2�.VV 1.20 -- 13.5? RO,7V �0.5 yS[CTlON 2 RUNV[F .01 J 2 .N .O 4.B0 74.1H 2.3l -- 12.34 15.171 \014.V YAECTlDN J RUNOFF .N J 2 .N .A 4,80 24.00 2.71Z -- ]?.2J XSECT{0N 4 ADDHYU 4,07 J 2 .1V .0 4.OV ?4.00 1.2) -- )J.52 8>4.63 700,4 YSFCT7ON 5 RUNOFF 4.05 .0 4.81-D ?4.00 LB0 -- 0.51 R/2.7V 7 111)N.5 XRFC77UN 6 A0OHY0 4.07 J 2 .10 .0 4.B0 24.00 �,?) -- |J.52 YS[CT}UN 1 RUHOFF �.V5 J ? .N .V 5.4V ?4.00 �3,A8 ySFCTlON ? RUNUFF .V1 J 2 .N .0 5.«0 24.130 ?,R0 -- >2.34 0.5O |7ill.6 XSFCTlUN 3 RUNDFF .V1 J 2 .N .V 5.4V ?4.VV 3.28 -- \?.23 25.O2 l��.V %SECT{UN 4 0DUHYD 4.07 ] 2 .10 ,O 5.0- 24.66 1.56 -- �J.48 1100.15 ��.6 � YS[CT[UN 5 RUNOFF 4.05 J ? .N .V 5.4V 74,VV 13.48 1097.18 �FCTlON 6 ADOHYD 4.07 � 2 .1� .0 5.4V ?4.VO 1.57 -- 13.4R 11OV'06 7N.6 TR20 UP 66-28-96 15/44 RSIR SNllVAN AVE. 976-748A1 JUB It SUMMARY REV PC 69/8J( 2)` PART 10 SUNMARY TA8LF 3 - DlSCHARGF (CFS) AT XSECT<0NS AN8 STRVCTU8FS FD8 4U STDRMS AND A|�TERNATES YSECT0N/ DRAINAGE STKUCTURF AIRFA STORM NUN8FRS......-,.. ' lD (SQ MD 10 25 A|T[8NATE 1097.18 ALTERNAT[ 50 veUT TON �TRRNATE ALTFRNATF 1 814.6J )1VO.15 ALTFRNATF 1 812.20 1097.18 ALTERNATE 1 814.6V 11V0.06 � | ASK X5ELT l � fi�b.5' pb.�vNk �tv Ott OELTo o Z �x is-r. -ram X .S 0 03 P i26 Pas � s i i S �L"t' fib . �CSCGi e� I + 6 6 Z X S E-L.7 ob 3 + vCS t INFORMATION REQUIRED PER SECTION VIII 8.1 OF THE WETLANDS REGULATION: A. Applicant: RSK-KELLCO, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 B. Property Owner: Chun Sik& Hee Choi 1363 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 C. Option to purchase for development of single family homes. D. Proposed site is located on the west side of Sullivan Avenue,approximately 550 feet south of Sand Hill Road. Parcel No. 20. E. See Plot Plan Sheet No. 3 of 12. F. Applicant will provide proof of notification. G. Riprap ditch for storm water discharge. Construction of approximately 70 LF of ditch could be completed within 1 day. H. Approximately 40 CY of top soil and sandy subsoil (assumed from closest test pit)to be removed. I.-J. Approximately 700 SF of wetland to be altered. This area should return to a similar wetland condition. K. No stream alteration is proposed. L. 9.50±AC of project area. M. This location of discharge was the only practical point due to the natural slope of the land. 92694\A 1\GBM0814A.WPD Corres. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES TO THE WETLANDS COMMISSION THAT: a. No portion of the property on which the regulated activity is proposed is located within 500 feet of the space boundary of an adjoining municipality; b. Traffic attributable to the completed project on the site will not use streets within the adjoining municipality to enter or exit the site; C. Sewer or water drainage from the project site will not flow through and impact the sewage or drainage system within the adjoining municipality; or d. Water run-off from the improved site will not impact streets or other municipal or private property within the adjoining municipality. 92694\A 1\GBM0730A.WPD Cones. 'TCf101 OF SOUTH WINDSOR ID : 203-644-3781 AUG 07 ' 9E 8 : 54 No . 001 P . 02 r CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Statewide Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Activity Reporting Form n accordance with the requirements of Section 22a-3 9-14 of the Regulations of Connecticut Mate Igencles, this forr Is to be completed for each action. Completed forms for all reportable Actions during a calendar month shall be maile to the Commissioner by the local agency no later then the 15th day of the month following the month in which the actin was taken. (See Instructions on back) 1. TOWN: South Windsor 2. LOCATION:(original scale copy of the USG$ QUAD MaD with the site outlined or pinpointed) USES QUAD MAP NUMBER: OR NAME: Manchester. CT i 3. APPLICANTNIOLATOR OR PROJECT'NAME; Fieldstone Subdivision nc. 4. ACTIVITY TYPE CODE:- (see list of codes on back, max. of 4 codes) . • 12 ] If type code is 12 or 13, briefly describe the activity: 5. ACTIVITY PURPOSE CODE: (enter only one code letter) . . . . . . . . . . [ B ) 6. AREA OF WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES ALTERED (or proposed to be altered, temporar. or permanent, for A" agency permits, denials and enforcement actions) A. Wetland Area Altered: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1700 'ACRES o � (circle one) B. Open Water Body Area Altered: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [ 0 ACRES OR SO. FT.) (circle one) C. Stream Alteration: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [ 0 LINEAR FT.) 7. AREA OF WETLANDS OR WATERCOURSES CREATED: . . . . . . . [ 0 ACRES OR SO. FT.) (do not include wetlands converted to open water) (circle one) 8. TOTAL AREA OF PROJECT SITE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [9.5+-ACRES) For Local Agency Use Only For State Use Only 9. REPORTING MONTH: 10. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: Y N GIS CODE # 11. ACTION: enter letter A, permit issued B. permit denied C. permit extended/amended D. map amendment E. enforcement action F. jurisdictional ruling 12. AGENT: DATE RECEIVED DEP/rev.1/95 • r" �ia� `. ,..�� `••� .�, ° it� ;.r s.. /b o a n ams • inc�s� � o - '• � ILq 1 ♦ � 262 ` oa��� ��- 1 •B8. � i s er 90 frllrickyd JP d - emu:. - PPtn• _ ...V it 3SStat oo'"* ,,`'.a -`\o r Sa u Q STROM °.H oo 19 a —ROao '� ,�. o W in ■ N� ALI /00 �, �� p ��pi�` i � ''� .;�, �, moo , � � •°: � I Q. - '.r::�� JOB-\� �///� _... c:� � �- ,,. •o"'-"-:, 0 0 ••O'�//� � °� �0'� - �.:f - - �.`� ( E'f• _ mow. � o � O d� �i q �� TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT RSK-Kellco has proposed the Fieldstone subdivision comprised of 14 building lots for single family homes located at 1363 Sullivan Avenue in South Windsor, Connecticut. Fuss& O'Neill has been retained to assess the traffic impact of the proposed development. This assessment has been prepared in support of the application for subdivision approval. Access to the 14 lot subdivision will be provided by proposed Fieldstone Drive intersecting Sullivan Avenue. Fieldstone Drive will be 26' in width providing two-way traffic. Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection is approximately 36' in width providing a 13'travel lane and 5' shoulder in each direction. The posted speed limit on Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 40 miles per hour. Estimates of the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development, were made using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 5th Edition publication "Trip Generation." This publication is a compilation of trip generation data for similar facilities and provides data for entering and exiting traffic relative to the size of the development. Using the number of singe family homes proposed,the calculations yield the number of vehicles which can be expected to enter and exit the subdivision during peak hours and on a daily basis. These generation volumes are summarized in the attached Trip Generation Volume Worksheet. As can be seen in this worksheet, it is anticipated that 15 trips (4 enter, 11 exit) and 18 trips (12 enter, 6 exit) will be generated during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Sight distances looking to the left and right from the location of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection with Sullivan Avenue exceed the required sight distances as set forth in the Connecticut Department of Transportations"Guidelines for Highway Design" (January 1990). The developer will ensure that adequate site lines are provided and maintained as shown on the attached site plans. The operation of the proposed stop sign controlled "T" intersection of Fieldstone Drive with Sullivan Avenue will provide safe and efficient travel for traffic in the area. The exiting development traffic may experience fairly long delays during peak hours due to the high traffic volumes on Sullivan Avenue. However, this situation is similar to the conditions experienced at many other establishments along Sullivan Avenue, and no abnormal traffic conditions are expected. In summary, it is the professional opinion of Fuss & O'Neill., Inc. that the introduction of the traffic generated by the proposed Fieldstone subdivision in conjunction with the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection geometry and traffic control, will not disrupt the continuity of traffic flow on the adjacent Sullivan Avenue roadway system. 96284\A 1\WAV0809A.WPD Corres. O FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers TRIP GENERATION VOLUME WORKSHEET 14 LOT SUBDIVISION/1363 SULLIVAN AVENUE RSK-KELLCO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING - ITE L.U.C. 210 SIZE/UNITS 14 A. LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS* ENTER EXIT TOTAL WEEKDAY 84 84 169 AM PEAK 4 11 15 PM PEAK 12 6 18 B. RATE ANALYSIS* ENTER EXIT TOTAL WEEKDAY 67 67 134 AM PEAK 3 8 10 PM PEAK 9 5 14 * USING DATA COMPILED BY THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AS PUBLISHED IN "TRIP GENERATION" (5th EDITION) \96284\A1\TRI PGEN.WQ2 Real Estate Appraisers 624 Talcottville Road Vernon, CT 06066 Robert Morra Telephone (203) 875-6201 Michael Aletta Fax (203) 872-9663 August 16, 1996 Richard Kell]VI RSK Kellco Inc. 1750 Ellington Road South Windsor, Ct 06074 Re: Appraisal of property 1363 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Ke11�3�{ Pursuant to your request a personal inspection and appraisal was made of land located at the rear of 1363 Sullivan Avenue, in the town of South Windsor, Connecticut. The subject consists of a 9.2 +/- acre parcel of land improved with a single family dwelling. The dwelling on the minimum required lot of 40,000 s/f will not be appraised. The remaining 8 . 3 +/- acres of raw land represents the property being appraised. The 8 .3 acre is basically a level hay lot. The subject parcel being appraised has a minimal 175 feet of frontage on Sullivan Avenue. The subject is appraised "as is" raw land in a rural residential zoning district. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting subject value. It is my opinion based on my analysis the subject 8. 3 +/- acre of "as is" as of August 16, 1996 is $50, 000. 00. FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Respectfully submitted, R Zet . Morra PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL The purposes of this appraisal report is to establish an estimated fair market value of the subject property, 8. 3 +/- acres of raw land as of the date of my inspection, August 16, 1996. The appraisal report is to be used by the Town of South Windsor in determining an open space fee on the subject lot. DEFINITION FEE SIMPLE ESTATE Absolute ownership of Real Estate that is unincumbered by any other interest or estate and is subject to the limitations of eminent domain, escheat, police power, and taxations. "Income Property Appraisal" Jeffrey D. Fisher & Robert S. Martin Dearborn Financial Publishing, Inc. 1991 Page #3 -1- DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE An analysis was made to establish an Estimated Fair Market Value. Definition of Market Value -- as defined by the financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) : The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) Buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (3) A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open . market; (4) Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. The Market Value estimated in this report reflects a hypothetical sale as of the date of the appraisal. -2- TOWN DATA SOUTH WINDSOR. Hartford County.-(Form of government, town manager, town council. ) -Inc. , May, 1845; taken from East Windsor. Area, 28.5 sq. miles. Population, est. , 21,800. Voting districts, 6. Children, 2,486. Principal industries, fuel cell power plants, automatic numerically controlled drafting machines, digitizers, graphic systems, CAD/CAM systems, photoplotters, artwork generators, electronic and electromechanical controls for aircraft and missle field modular power supplies, computer controlled cloth cutters, automatic grading and market systems, jet engine/aerospace parts and components, precision machine parts, commercial printing and typesetting, bricks, waste disposal incinerators, fin tube radiation, microflake cigar binders and wrappers, heat transfer decorations, pressure sensitive labels, store fixtures, precious metal recovery, agriculture. Transp.-Passenger: Served by buses of Post Road Stages, Inc. from Hartford and Stafford Springs, and Conn. Transit from Hartford to East Windsor Hill. Freight: Served by Conrail and numerous motor common carriers. Post offices, South Windsor; South Windsor R.F.D. 1, 2 , 3 and 4; East Windsor Hill and Rockville R.F.D. 3 . -3- NEIGHBORHOOD The subject is located along Sullivan Avenue, a two lane state highway, Route 194. The subject has a day care center and small office building north of the subject. The subject also abutts an undeveloped woodlands and wetlands area to the north. The area to the west of the subject is developed with moderate single family homes. The area to the south of the subject is open farm land. The area across the street from the subject contains a PUD single family home development, several single family homes, and a professional office complex. The subject is 1/4 mile from the Town Hall, and Post Office and 1/2 +/- mile to local shopping area. The subject is convenient to local schools and employment centers. -4- LEGAL REFERENCE The subject is in the name of Hee and Chun Sik Choi. The property is described in Volume 371 at page 298 of the Town of South Windsor Land Records. ASSESSMENT Since the subject is assessed as excess acres. The current assessment is $24, 020. The assessment is based on 70% of 1994 appraisal value. ZONING The subject is located in a RR Rural Residential Zone District. The District allows for developement of single family dwellings. Minimum lot requirements Lot size 40,000 s/f Lot frontage 175 feet The property being appraised is currently open farmland and in complience with local zoning. -5- SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL The appraisal report will consider all factors which effect the subject value as of August 16, 1996. The appraisal report will value the subject as an 8.3 +/- acres parcel of raw land in a rural residential zone. The following investigations and analysis were made by the appraiser. 1. The subject was physically inspected on August 16, 1996. All available public information, including zoning regulation, Town of South Windsor assessment data, and records of the Town Clerk's office was examined. 2 . The area markets were reviewed for sales of improved property similar to the subject 3 . The area markets were reviewed for sales of unimproved land. 4 . The market data approach will be developed and analyzed. 5. A final conclusion and determination of value was made. -6- SITE DESCRIPTION The subject is located on the westerly side of Sullivan Avenue. The parcel has 175 +/- feet of street frontage. The subject has a maximum dept of 1, 605 +/- feet and an average width of 500 feet. The total area is 8. 3 +/- acres. The subject is at grade along the street then gradually slopes down toward the rear line. The subject has a drop in elevation of 30 +/- feet. The subject is mostly open hay lot with wooded area around the perimeter. The subject has no improvements. The subject has sewer and public water available at the street as well as electrical and telephone services. See attached map for details. The subject does not appear to be in a designated wetlands or in a Flood Hazard area. See attached Flood Hazard Map #090036-0004-B dated May 1, 1980. Zone "C" . The subject is not considered a building lot but is considered excess acreage. The subject is appraised "as is" acreage. -7- HIGHEST AND BEST USE The subject is presently an 8. 3 +/- acre parcel of undeveloped land. The subject is in a rural residential zone. The subject "as is" has sufficient frontag one building lot. The subject could be developed into single family building lot. Such a developement would require the construction of a new street extending at least 700 feet. The maximum number of potential lots at a minimum 40, 000 s/f per lot is 7 lots. The cost of street construction made such a development economically non feasible. The subject's as is highest and best use is for development as a large single family building lot. -8- APPROACHES TO VALUE The traditional basic methods or techniques by which data may be processed into an indication of value: COST APPROACH - That approach in appraisal analysis which is based on the proposition that the informed purchaser would pay no more than the cost of producing a substitute property with the same utility as the subject property. It is particularly applicable when the property being appraised involves relatively new improvements which represent the highest and best use of the land or when relatively unique or specialized improvements are located on the site and for which there exists no comparable properties on the market. DIRECT SALES COMPARISON APPROACH - That approach in appraisal analysis which is based on the proposition that an informed purchaser would pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an existing property with the same utility. This approach is applicable when an active market provides sufficient quantities of reliable data which can be verified from authoritative sources. The direct sales comparison approach is relatively unreliable in an inactive market or in estimating the value properties for which no real comparable sales data are available. It is also questionable when sales data cannot be verified with principles to the transaction. Also referred to as the Market Comparison or Market Data Approach. INCOME APPROACH - That procedure in appraisal analysis which- converts anticipated benefits (dollar income or amenities) to be derived from the ownership of property into a value estimate. The income approach is widely applied in appraising income - producing properties. Anticipated future income and/or reversions are discounted to a present worth figure through the capitalization process. AMERICAN INSTITUTION OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS/SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS Revised Edition Real Estate Appraisal Terminology, ed. Byrl N. Boyce (Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1981) , p. 63, 79, and 132. -9- APPROACH TO VALUE The three approaches to value were considered. The cost approach to value was not used since the subject has no improvements. The income approach to value was not used since the subject generates no income and has no significant income potential. The market data or sales comparison approach to value will be developed and analyzed. The subject will be compared to several area land sales. The sales will be adjusted to the subject for difference. -10- COMPARABLE SALES Sale #1 Location: 8 Clark Street, Map 25 Lot 31 Lot size: 14 +/- acres Lot frontage: 980 +/- feet Zone: R.R. Site description: Rectangular Lot; 50-60% has a CUP R.O.W. across it. The northerly portion has a stream through it and has wetlands area around it Sales price: $80, 000 Price per acre: $5,714.00 Date of sale: 11/18/95 Grantor: J. Lawrence Grantee: H. Czernek volume: 829 Page: 114 Comments: It appears 25% to 30% is developable. I -11- j It i Iw 9 9 0 131 9 e ! FF Q �l �litii j O[ Y h ` Is go t ��t• ♦t w�'• �Q pit Jl All I J 1 r � I t � t r t �e • �1� `� •`1• r4 3 • 2X.0 + ro` r f• `` " ; to ♦J •w ♦ . h N. ; 3S �'`` ♦ r ' • 1NYG � I"y r �4 ' •4 C =j t���• � M•N33 e•M b0.� � •� e O \ J '� `F✓? f Sri -� ��°•!' h IA � r w - a •+t n° .t «� ? wi h :$• 1 L>fR r •. l«e Y j ° •'3�� 71 { n14 j !""�•1 i°. A3 t E' �.��- - - r a ti fy " �.y/e•' • j ri y G : t i Iz IIx(: °i • ` , '� I J I 'y r1�^�r ••� ! r =� is 1 i •� ii ° • • ..r � • •�� rF «S * ;t >wx '� •• «R R j t Fft of j \ J• l le•/^^ l f j ii + tt l t iFf• in x 1• • .;IRx % ! t E 71 too V, e ♦ t I i = 1 : �•ri J e• 46 t ow Ir • ax. ! x� ti sAI` '• w �• Sale #2 Location: Rear 44 Main Street Lot size: 4. 5 +/- acres Frontage: None, rear lot Zone: A40 Site description: The subject is a rectangular vacant lot set back 900 +/- feet from the street. Sales price: $10, 000.00 Price per acre: $2,222.00 Date of sale: 9/20/95 Grantor: Levack Grantee: J.E. Shepard Company Volume: 859 Page: 91 Comments: The parcel was purchased by an abutter. -13- Comp 2 a3y -14- Sale #3 Location: Abbe Road Extension, Map 102 Page 65 Lot Size: 11.76 +/- acres Frontage: 600 +/- feet Zone: R.R. Description: undeveloped land located at the end of Abbe Road extension. The subject has a stream running through it and a wetlands area. Sales Price: $110,000.00 Price per acre: $9,354. 00 Date of Sale: 6/3/94 Grantor: Philip Ireland Grantee: Ireland Family. Limited Partnership Volume: 796 Page: 283 -15- tt • • leTr • e.Nr n N � � t r` K • e.eer e.M4 trr b s leW. v rr • .leer f « w • • rr r.r rr • H , err4. �•� r S.aM. 414 eJl.. e.rr e.tu., e.rr eeua e T . • t ♦•iiK Ze C �eqK • r I.o eM etw O I. 40 Nr e.•er *.soft = I.ur + eY. , f . Irl we lle j e.nr; I Rte • r r U,1 ------`=---- f♦eIS � t w .. LEGEND rr` --------- w Star N no on •aI _.r Re.O rr i IM. h I.Mr • •f•Sur `r aMK ` e.ttr {• --- Y• Ile ♦ IA ) „ f I.t.Y et Soeef STr Wit.. N •3 N • Y i y e.N4 a I efOr. MewtM.N w e. ettr eNr • l t.11lwel•U.t— . e./or j eZ 11 f♦ or I� A. lNr e.NK • To v r. « . I f♦ m tt.N err . � � •Ir e.Nr ♦ s $aNK r w TS • .M ; j Ze r • , r , �♦ I r•rr Ir, eMM. W W �, N • aO.NY. ♦ • ,I� t• •.11u.l•ees•e n e.Nr Nr to,1 \\` i O.NY. l.r /e � ♦ ♦+ yr i I• e.»r \\\Irl .+ r." • „ tMo[ e"M ♦ ..r�.trrt N.w.. I 0.0, I e.w rr attr 110 r...l.r.Nl.11 N.1.•.I �� is aRt ..r • STREET l + y SS e.TN• l •. r ee ~ / so tl r err • •�` ,73 le 1+.1 I' ♦, I.NK • j e.etr. lMre� lw !! 71 e j " ♦..♦' t r A ..r..rr e.r =�•� • • •Tr C • O.Nr �.` • • , j , r...n.� r. (�J 131 4 � ••��� (J e'Nr' n •Nr too N I �' ♦ r e.t.r r_ f TO r *.TV" So 1 ar leei.. OUINN ASSOCIATE e,N .4 e tlK — �� _ ltsr etor •.0.nr CO1np 3 1 .. a.Nr it tar KEY TO SHEETS •' Ip NE 107 II.T•Y. r 1 1\ Te i 70rM M eollre trleto• YT[M•NT•NYMFrrW te,NM W...r.� •� r S/KlT rt OF.te Sale #4 Location: 175 Lawrence Street, Map 129 Lot 11 Lot Size: 31.7 acre Frontage: 830 feet Zone: R.R. Description: The parcel is an undeveloped lot with an area of wetlands in the center portion. Sales Price: $200, 000. 00 Price per acre: $6, 309.00 Date of Sale: 4/18/84 Grantor: A. Trudeau Grantee: Dart Hill Realty Inc. Volume: 786 Page: 262 -17- i 2 NIN fN 12M N♦• 20117M M nr or M +7 cc [ Y 77 •. • L 0:f74O 0.N4 1e.0 71 ; 0.408. y 4 \ y f i I.NY M � g i � Is 1 a [ 0.13it 14 w. i Is ,LNG i i s 0 .77k LNN 12 { (` •....r 1..N4 MAL • 0. 1 = O i Is 1 � t " 1 i i e N4 wN4 f 7s\ 17 •[ • y aN.t. IS i 0.74" - •a17k 7t is l i O.Rk so as \ / IJ •• N. O.414 0.71N• »../ \ 71 \ t = 4111a\ =� 01ff- i } 0 UY IMN [O.11 �+ rw t e. ...il to -- w♦. t/IMNCRt 120- ►y .NJ ,rrl O M ...\ NO 17 s1 of 70 �` =S•� • 0.ION O.71N •NIA O.M4 • � n.M .1•.f f � �1.w f • a i 00 1° � w/ a7.4 w t O/fY O.Nk of SO St.30" ..r aw- 1 , / rN I3 Ji 0 •a :E CLI►IWO00 DRIVEIAOY. psl r a� IN ON i Il s • s 1. [ IRSLt I.f1Ja. L704 70to a."" e.i N4 t I.90f • _.� r I.N4 r w„ 00 �� p ..N x.M O. n. ♦ .n. OAS Y. » ♦ J 1 / ItI aN 4 �• = 0.1 ` 9N4 I.N4 2 aM4 aM4 I7 a.t k N ..J •.III♦ / ». »wN N.I a� ,� aiik �•• _/ 44 tees- YIN /Ir UN INI •n Ir/1" r R 00 » „ } 77 7/ Y ap-1, t O.N4 0.Lf4 e.N4 O"a. [ I.-ON 1+ t, e r � � ~ rn.I M •+1 `� f • .I ' 0• OMJa i tl o 93 "4 • � I.204 ` S It M 'L• N•. »n1 1 aNY • M r f aNN * - 34 1.25k r aN4 ADJUSTMENTS The sales were adjusted to the subject for difference. The sales were adjusted on a per acre basis. Sale #1, 8 Clark Street, $5,714.00 per acre was adjusted: + $2 ,000. 00 Site conditions: The sale has 300 feet. wide CL&P R.O.W. and a wetlands area 35% - $2, 000. 00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 25% + $1, 150. 00 Location: Subject superior to sale 20% + $1, 150. 00 Net adjustment $6,864. 00 Adjusted per acre value Sale #2 , Rear 44 Main Street, $2,222.00 per acre was adjusted: + $2 ,000.00 Frontage: Sale has no frontage + $1;000.00 Location: Sale is 900 feet from street + $3 , 000.00 Net adjustment $5,222. 00 Adjusted value per acre -19- Sale #3 , Abbe Road Extension, $9, 354.00 per acre was adjusted - $3 ,300. 00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 35% + $1, 000. 00 Site Condition: sale has an area of wet lands 10% S 500. 00 Time: Sale occured 26 months ago, land value depreciated 5% $2,800.00 Net adjustment $6,554 . 00 Adjusted value Sale #4, 175 Lawrence Street, $6, 309.00 per acre was adjusted: - $2 ,200. 00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 35% + $1,500. 00 Site condition: Sale has an area of wetlands, 25% $ 300. 00 Time: Sale occured 28 months ago, land value depreciated 5% $1, 000. 00 Net adjustment $5, 309. 00 Adjusted value per acre The adjusted sales indicated values of $5,222.00, $5, 309.00, $6,554. 00 and $6,864.00. The sales all bracket the subject value. The adjusted sales tend to indicate a value between $5, 500. 00 to $6,500. 00. It is my opinion the subject per acre value is $6, 000.00. -20- CONCLUSION AND RECONCILIATION The subject is an 8.3 +/- acre parcel of raw land located in an R.R. zone. The subject "as is" is not an approved building lot but is a parcel of land with potential to be developed as a building lot. The subject's highest and best use was determined to be as a single family building lot. The market data approach was developed. Four land sales were examined and adjusted to the subject. The adjusted sale indicated a value of $6, 000.00 per acre. The subject value is calculated as follows: $6, 000.00 x 8. 3 acres = $49,800.00, rounded to $50, 000. 00. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting subject value. It is my opinion, the subject's estimated fair market "as is" as of August 16, 1996 in fee simple is $50, 000. 00. FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Respectfully submitted, subm/ijntted, Rober R. Morra Appraiser -21- . °a jl' I � ^ it ill �,� �q � ; �i .� ��, � .. CERTIFICATE OF LIMITING CONDITIONS The Ap raiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the pro Ter y - apppraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal.value ofhthecompensations for it, is contingent upon the All conclusions and opinions concerning the real estate that are set forth in the appraisal report, were prepared by the Appraiser whose signature appears on the appraisal report, unless indicated as "Review Appraiser". No change of any item in the appraisal report shall be made by anyone other than the Appraiser, an a the appraiser shall have no responsibility for any such unauthorized change. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the Apppraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership. Any, sketch in the report may,show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The Appraiser has made no survey of the pro erty; The appraiser is not required o give testimon or appear in court because of have made the appraisal with reverence to the roperty in question, unless arrangements have been previously made herefore. Any distribution of the valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the exist*n program of utilization. The se arate valuations for land and buiding must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. The Appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or inapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for such condition, or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. Information estimates, and opinions furnished to the Appraiser and contained in the re ort were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed o �e true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. Disclosure of the contents of the araisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of Ue professional appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report or copy. thereof, (including conclusions as to the propert value the identity of the Appraiser, professional designation, reverence to any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the AAppraiser if connected) , shall be used for any purposes by anyone but the client specified in the retort, the borrower if appraisal fee paid by same, the mortgagee or i s successors and assigns, mort a e insures, consultants, rofessional appraisal organization, any sta e or federally ap roved financial institution, an department, agency or instrumentally of the United States or any Mate or the District of Columbia without the previous written consent of the Appraiser, nor shall it be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising public relation news, sales, or other media, without written consent and approval of the appraiser. On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner. -25- CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, - the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - the reported analyses, opinion, and conclusions are limited only be the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involves. - my compensation is not contingent on an action or event re- sulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in or the use of, this report. - my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the re- quirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the American Society of Appraisers, and with the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) - the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the American Society of Appraisers relating to review by its duly authorized representative. - Robert R. Morra made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report on various dates including no one provided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this report. -the appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the p ro of loan Robert Cmorra Appraiser Lic #RGT 1095 -26- ROBERT R. MORRA 624 TALCOTTVILLE ROAD VERNON, CONNECTICUT 06066 AGE: 52 EDUCATION Eastern Connecticut University, Willimantic, Connecticut Bachelor of Arts; Major Education, Mathematics, and Science 1969 Master's Degree; Earth Sciences 1973 Real Estate Courses and Appraisal Courses Principles and Practices, Manchester Community College 1976 Appraisal I, Manchester Community College 1978 Real Estate Finance, Manchester Community College 1979 Appraisal II, University of Connecticut 1 1993 USPAP & Code of Ethics, American Society of Appraisers 1992 Various continuing education courses and seminars 1986-PRESENT EXPERIENCE Sixteen years of sales and brokerage of commercial and industrial Real Estate 1978-Present Partner Morra-Lavitt Realty 1981-Present Fifteen years of appraisals of Real Estate 1979-Present Qualified and testified as an expert in Real Estate matters, all State of Connecticut Courts, and Federal Bankruptcy courts Licenced in Connecticut for appraisals of Residential, Industrial, and Commercial Real Estate licence #RGT 1095 Associate, Raiche Associates, Real Estate Appraisers, Wethersfield, Connecticut 1979-1987 Owner and Principal, Morra Associates, Real Estate Appraisers Vernon, Connecticut 1988-Present PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member Greater Vernon Board of Realtors; 1979-Present Member of Commercial and Industrial Division of the CAR Region Vice-President Northeast Chapter, 1983-1984, President 1985-1986 Candidate Member American Society of Appraisers 1993-Present MAJOR CLIENTS REPRESENTED Stafford Savings Bank Stafford, Connecticut Savings Bank of Rockville Vernon, Connecticut Bank of South Windsor South Windsor, Connecticut Manchester State Bank Manchester, Connecticut Bay Bank of Boston East Long Meadow, Massachusetts Prudential Relocation Shelton, Connecticut Various Mortgage Companies Connecticut Towns of Bolton, East Hartford, Somers, and Stafford, Connecticut. Numerous Connecticut and out of state Attorneys Salvation Army Connecticut Various area Corporations and individual property owners -27- J 3 FL 1' 39 FL 71-r,731 � � f -7F i2 771 7S.z 1 7.3 S' J o, ; �, o o _ 81 IN /o F,8 R3, �17.i7 errs/ tj F,,,&O'Neill Inc, consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road,Manohester,CT 06040-5921 m w 646.2469 FAx w 643-6313 1200 Converse Street,Longmeadow,MA 01106.1721 TEL 413 567.9880 FAW 413 567.8936 Frovid®noe,R1 TEL 401 828-3510 April 23, 1997 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco 1750 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Record)drawing fieldstone Subdivision South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Kelley: Based on our discussion and my review of the Progress Record Drawing, the elevation of the top of frame and invert elevations at the sedimentation chamber, at the end of the cul-du-sac of Heritage Drive.have been revised. Attached is a portion of the Progress Record Drawing depicting those changes, If can be of further assistance with this matter, please call me at 646-2469 x211. Si cerely, Lawrence R. Geissler, Jr,, L.S. Chief of Survey/Associate 962841A 11LR00423 A,W PD Corral, T•d 1I3N,O 18 ssnj wuvo:90 L6, cz Ndu F....- ................_ / LOT #9 , �- 'r 2C Ole wo , � •� / �8. 113.2 ���r �. .f�� r r `• 1 ��- r r H r ,06E 0� RO• S S94 . 4% 1 96 4� �� 1 ,,•''� OW 91 ••,,rE' Lea p�►��6 ,,%1 00.0 rr Ny( �7g.3g G 1�` V" �rt.at ce NV(N 12 co 1d � W-83.88 p� I G I LOT 6 All, � r o LOT #8 r LOT #7 I � f / j MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: August 28, 1996 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the drawings dated 8-14-96 for the proposed Fieldstone Subdivision and have the following comments: Sheet 2 1 . Curb cuts, driveways and Peachbrooke Drive should be shown. Sheet 3 1 . Sanitary easement to Pierce Road should be described with bearings and distances. 2 . Peachbrooke Drive should be shown. 3 . Disposition of "Parcel B" is not indicated. 4. The 20 ' landscape easement should be identified more clearly. 5 . The proposed name of the Road - Fieldstone - should be changed. It is similar to others in town i .e. , Stonefield, Hearthstone, Sandstone, Stonehaven, Stonehenge Sheet 4 & 5 1 . Underdrains should be placed on both sides of road from station 5+40 to cul-de-sac and around the cul-de-sac. Soils (EOA, EOB & ESA) have high groundwater tables. 2. Lot to lot drainage needs to be addressed in a positive manner - stormwater should be collected before crossing onto neighbors property. 3. Proposed sanitary easement to Pierce Road shows driveway and a shed within it. The shed should be relocated and the easement documents should indicate that the Town will not be responsible for any repairs to the driveway if repair of pipe or manhole is necessary. 4. A manhole is required in proposed sanitary main to Pierce Road. Town standards require a maximum of 300 feet of pipe between structures. 5 . Footing drains and sanitary laterals are not shown. Marcia A. Banach August 28, 1996 Re: Fieldstone Page 2. 6 . Sanitary manhole 6A should have a 6 ' (min. ) stub placed for future main to the southwest. 7 . Stormwater outlet at southwest corner of property a. A biofilter (natural earthen sedimentation channel) should be utilized with check dams to slow velocity of water. b. The end of the proposed riprap channel is on property of N/F Priest. A right to construct, an easement to the Town and a right to drain are required for this situation. 8. The storm pipe within the "Sanitary and storm sewer easement" should be moved to the west to provide more clearance for the future sanitary main. 9 . The velocities in the stormwater pipes from CB8 to MH12 should be reduced as they are in the 10 feet per second range. 10. A "Type 1 " sedimentation structure should be used at structure 11 because of the high velocities. 11 . A gravel access road in accordance with Town standards must be provided over the storm and sanitary "cross country" pipes. Also locking manhole covers are to be used for structures not in pavement. 12. Slopes of storm and sanitary pipes should be shown. 13. Another catch basin should be placed in the cul-de-sac. 14. Storm pipe is indicated as "ADS" it should state "ADSN12" . 15 . A manhole should be placed at end of storm pipe to future road (from CB6) . 16. Temporary grading rights for future road should be obtained from lots 5 and 6. 17 . Pull offs at the street line will be required for proposed driveways on lots 12 and 13. 18. Storm pipes from CB2 to CB1 & CB4 to CB5 are not identified as to size, type, length, slope. 19 . Peachbrooke Drive should be labeled. 20. Sanitary main to Peachbrooke should be shown. 21 . Test pits should be taken along proposed road and results submitted. ' Marcia A. Banach August 28, 1996 Re: Fieldstone Page 3. 22. Pavement radius of the cul-de-sac should be indicated. 23 . A manhole should be placed for expansion of sanitary sewer down future road. 24. An A-2 certification is required. Sheet 6 1 . Inverts are required for sanitary laterals and footing drains both at the houses and at the main. 2. Finish floor elevations should be indicated on plan. 3. A test hole should be dug in Pierce Road where proposed sanitary manhole is to be placed. It appears that a possible conflict with the storm pipe may exist. 4. The new sanitary manhole in Pierce Road shows to have a drop. This should be an outside drop and a detail provided. 5 . Additional cleanout required for lot 1 - town standard is for 100 ' maximum spacing. 6. Lot 3 has no footing drain or sanitary lateral shown. 7 . No footingdrain shown for lots 1 4 5 and 14. , Sheet 11 1 . Watertight, locking manhole cover detail is required for those manholes not in pavement. Sheet 12 1 . Roadway section detail should indicate that the pavement design shall be submitted to the Town Engineer for approval prior to pavement being placed. Traffic Assessment 1 . Sight distances are indicated as "exceed the required sight distances. . . ", however, there is no indication as to design speed used, whether the distances were minimum or desirable as defined in the DOT Guidelines. The desirable sight distances should be required due to the nature of Sullivan Avenue. Drainage Calculations 1 . Rational method should be used and checked against the TR55 results. JCl/JSV tal1er1JC1961MABMEM0S�UHst— FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION Planning Comments 1. Key Map surrounding property owners within 500 feet must be identified curb cuts on surrounding properties must be shown 2. Zoning Table total acreage of the lot should be indicated open space requirement should be addressed(if applicant is proposing a fee in lieu of open space, an appraiser should be submitted for approval by the PZC) 3. Plot Plan the status of Parcel B must be addressed the drainage easement from the Priests to RSK-Kellco should be delineated on the plans 4. Landscaping Plan Karl Reichle, Tree Warden has suggested that the street tree planted be a Norwegian Maple(a summary sheet has been enclosed) Police Services Sgt. Mike Ritter has expressed a concern about a possible traffic problem turning left to exit Fieldstone, and also turning left from northbound Sullivan Ave. during peak hours. Norwegian Sunset Shantung Hybrid Maple Ac xx NS l Acer truncatum x A. platanoides 'Keithsform' P.P. 7529, trademarked Height: 35' to 45' (35' at age 30) Width: 25' to 35' (25' at age 30) Hardiness Zone: 4 to 8 Crown: upright ovate, medium texture Foliage: 3" to 6", glossy dark green, orange-red to red in fall Flowers: greenish-yellow Fruit: 11/2 samara Description: A naturally occurring hybrid of Shantung maple and Norway maple selected in Oregon for fall color, branching, and fast growth. Has uniform branching and crown shape. In- troduced in 1989. Advantages: Has brighter fall colors and finer branching than Norway maple.The parentage suggests the mature size will be smaller than Norway maple and more heat tolerant. Limitations: None known yet.Mature size is uncertain.Refer to Acer platanoides for possible problems. Site and Culture: Transplants readily.Tolerates partial shade and'a wide range of soils, pH, heat, drought, !; and pollutants. i Notes: PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Matt Galligan, ed Shaw, Michael Gantick, Sargent Mike Ritter, Fire Mar ping, Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mel Stead FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: :Iaj D Zone A " Acreage �`� Commercial Subdiv X _ Site Plan Residential # of Lots/Units � "1 Industrial Location: W Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No (a) new streets (existing frontage also) (b) new open space/recreation area active passive (c) new detention area Planning Department comments: "71 Please let me know by 0 30, 9(r, if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. Thank you. L,' /.3`I -"! ,,. ,�..Ci`—"T'�Y�-v�^s-.-A LJ. � LW-- �(, � � �-v�--e-�►"-�;vim,.--,��- �< 1�-�-��,.�...� (..,z,.�g-. -h�//�,.fi/`tt�--ez..e.�d--e.x� f�t°Wl�i- -y-. cr�� , �e.�.�...,_.,,�r.,,,—�-1�- 4�.,�✓�+r-'� I V l�^-:�-'�`- p ° I_,-``K�Y V--.ns-2,"""`�{ v.�f-�, s"h�-Get ��,.�,n.., t.�,-1 /�1✓/1n-, C-1 ay Soups o,n►�«$Ln l i.10 . /V�7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: l , ligan, Fred Shaw, Michael Gantick, Sargent Mike itt 'Fire Marshal Lanning, Ray Favreau, Karl Reichle, Mel Stead FROM: Marcia A. Banach, AICP, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering De rtments have received plans for the following project: (�Z Zone A Acreage �`� Commercial Subdiv X _ Site Plan Residential # of Lots/Units � `'i Industrial Location: rp 1Aq Wf"LL Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No (a) new streets (existing frontage also) (b) new open space/recreation area active passive (c) new detention area Planning Depar tment comments: TO Please let me know by if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. Thank you. Mob IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW GROUP MEETING Friday, August 30, 1996 9:00 am., Sprenkel Room TO: John Collins Jerry Iazzetta ae Bill Lanning Mike Ritter Fred Shaw Karl Reichle Ray Favreau Mel Stead Matt Galligan Gary Tyler Ralph Hedenburg Jeff Folger Bob Deptula FROM: Marcia Banach/Michele Lipe The following applications/proposals will be reviewed at this meeting. Plans are available in the Planning Department for your advance review. 1. Appl. #96-53P, Recyclers, Inc. - Site Plan of Development for the expansion of a parking lot located on Lot #3, 600 Nutmeg Road North, I zone. 2. Appl. #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision - 14 lot subdivision on 9.5 ac., located on the westerly side of Sullivan Ave, southerly of Sand Hill Road, A-20 zone. 3. Appl. #96-57P, Russell H. Petersen - Temporary and Conditional permit for the operation of a pumpkin stand located at 225 Oakland Road, RC zone. �YD I c,rr1,. fit'!W�Cl�t-...� Gt�itNcvt� ,f'�vGt4••.... � 5�1.11M�L� Y'"�.G be bio ►; . ►-H_t r\ Ste- C14a �AAF ?? e �u�k � � AEG 2 3 1996 r p a .� l✓ �. f'�`�' �✓� /jKr 1-� a f SAM. Gt� i4- f say,, l du e ,f p4: e.eiaId, �d lag' " —,rd�wyw -'Lo 0 W crt TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR MEMO To: Jerry Iazzetta From: Mel Stead ')'1/�� Subject: Fieldstone Subdivision Date: August 23, 1996 The following is a list of items that need further evaluation and adjustment on the submitted plan: • What will be the ultimate disposition of Parcel B? Ownership, landscape maintenance. • Rear of lot 8 drainage outlet to property of another owner. What will be our deeded or legal rights, maintenance responsibility and access? • From centerline Fieldstone to center line Peachbrook is 200 feet. • Lot to lot drainage from lot 6 to lot 7 could be a problem because of orientation of house of lot 27. • We should have an additional manhole in the sanitary sewer line from Pierce Road. 438 ft. too long for sewer cleaning equipment (regulation 300 - 350 feet). • Pierce Road has special base design- poor soil conditions - and I think it has perforated pipe under drains in this area. • We have a Stonefield, Hearthstone, Sandstone, Stonehave, Stonehenge. This is very confusing to those of us that have to dispatch emergency and maintenance equipment. Should consider another name. MCS/gh A , , ;blF AUG 2 3 190'e .Jv � thy. Ar THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY T-` C W C GENERAL OFFICE: 93 WEST MAIN STREET A SUBSIDIARY OF CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC. CLINTON,CONNECTICUT 06413-1600 TEL.860-669-8636 September 5, 1996 y;tzJ1yz1 Mr. Russell Levack, Chairman SEP 6 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission Town Hall South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ South Windsor, CT 06074 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Re: Public Hearing- Fieldstone Subdivision, 1363 Sullivan Avenue Dear Mr. Levack: The Connecticut Water Company(CWC)has been made aware of the above proposed project. This property is located within the initial setback area of our Kupchunos future wellsite as delineated by our Department of Environmental Protection approved Level B aquifer map. This project is also located adjacent to this future wellsite. Therefore we are very concerned with any activities that could impact this important future drinking water supply source. I have reviewed the site plan entitled'Fieldstone Subdivision'prepared by Fuss & O'Neill Inc. dated 8/14/96 and would like to offer the following comments. 1. The prospective homeowners for lot#'s 10-12 should be made aware that their property abuts a future wellsite property. We recommend a 25 foot conservation easement area be established at the rear of these three lots to provide additional protection to our property. All development activities, including tree clearing, should be prohibited within the conservation easement area. This should be noted on the site plan and in the deeds to these lots. All prospective homeowners within this subdivision should be made aware that the dumping of any materials/chemicals onto the ground or into the storm drainage system is prohibited. 2. Underground fuel storage tanks should be prohibited on this site. This should be noted on the site plan and deeds to the individual lots. 3. The sediment chamber must be maintained for it to function properly. It should be noted on the site plan who will be responsible for the long term maintenance of this structure. 4. CWC's Northern Region office will need to review the plans concerning the location of the water main. Source protection is a vital concern of The Connecticut Water Company and we appreciate the opportunity to comment on proposals that may affect our sources of supply. Sin erely, . a&vcd,� Cindy F. Alleman Source Protection Supervisor cc: WFG, DFL E. Warren, Chr. I/W Comm. B. Kelley, RSK Kellco /� September 6, 1996 Ms. Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning Town Hall 1540 Sullivan.Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: RSK- KELLCO, Inc. Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT Dear Marcia: The following are Fuss & O'Neill's and the applicant's responses to the staff s comments concerning the Fieldstone subdivision. Comments by JerrXIazzetto Sheet 2 1. Items added Sheet 3 1. Bearings and distances added. 2. Peachbrooke Drive shown. 3. Yet to be determined. 4. Easement identified more clearly. 5. Proposed road name changed to Sheets 4 & 5 1. Underdrain was shown parallel to contours in the cul-de-sac. We are determining the need for underdrain on both sides of the road based on test pit information. 2. As shown,the flow arrows indicate swales between houses where appropriate. Contours have been adjusted to create a more positive swale between lots 6 thru 96284\A 1\GB M0905A.WPD Cones. r RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 6, 1996 Page 2 8 and lots 10 thru 14. Lots 3, , 4 and 5 slope away from the rear of the houses. An insignificant amount of surface flow crosses the rear of lot 9 from lot 10. 3. Notes added to address issues.` 4. Manhole added. 5. Footing drains and sanitary laterals added. 6. 6' stub added. 7. The riprap ditch is on a 0.20%o grade with modified riprap. This results in a velocity of 1.6 fps which can easily be accommodated in the ditch, and the ditch will soon evolve into a wetland with wetland growth. This low velocity does not require check dams. 8. Storm pipe was placed in the location shown to disturb as little of the existing tree line as possible. However,I did adjust the storm drain 2'to the west. This will give a 12' distance between pipes. This will leave plenty of room for future installation of the sanitary line. 9.. From CB#8 to Culvert End #13, the pipe grades have been flattened which results in the following velocities: 8-10 7.4 fps 10-11 7.5 fps 11-12 5.8 fps 12-13 5.7 fps 10. The sedimentation structure has a 15" pipe entering it. Normally with a"Type 1" structure, an 18" pipe would go to the chamber with a larger pipe bypassing excess flows. At this site,there is no excess flow to bypass. 11. Gravel access road revised to Town standards. Locking manhole frame and cover detail added. 12. Slopes where shown on the construction plan and profile sheets as required in section III 1. & 14.b, d, & g.of the subdivision regulations. 962 84\A I\G B M090 5 A.W P D Corres. RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 6, 1996 Page 3 13. The proposed single catch basin in the cul-de-sac is at a low point and the maximum depth of water for the design storm is .28 feet(3 3/8 inches). It is not felt that an additional basin is required. 14. Revised to "ADSN12". _ -- 15. Manhole added. 16. Temporary grading rights shown. 17. Grades adjusted. 18. See comment 12 above. Pipe sizes shown. 19. Peachbrooke Drive labeled. 20. Sanitary line shown. 21. Test pits were be taken by the applicant and results will be submitted to the Town. 22. Radius shown. 23. Land developed to the south will be served by future sanitary sewer line thru lot 8. This will serve the lower elevation of the Priest property. 24. A-2 certification shown. Sheet 6 1. Inverts shown. When the sanitary service lateral connection bend is installed at the main line location shown on the plan, the invert elevation is automatically set. 2. Finished floor elevation shown. 3. According to field location of utilities, the proposed manhole will clear 15" RCP, both horizontally and vertically. 4. Drop detail shown on sheet no. 10. 96284\A 1\GB M0905A.WPD Corres. RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 6, 1996 Page 4 5. Additional clean out shown. 6. Sanitary lateral shown, see comment 7 7. Based on test pit information by RSK,the basement floor is above high ground water. Sheet 11 1. Watertight, locking manhole cover detail added to sheet no. 11. Sheet 12 1. Design note added. Traffic Assessment The sight distances referenced in the Traffic Assessment and shown on the plans were specified in consideration of the 85th percentile speed for traffic traveling.on Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection. The 85th percentile speed data was obtained from ConnDOT which indicates 49.9 miles per hour northbound and 48.6 miles per hour southbound. The 650'sight line noted on the plan corresponds to a sight line value in accordance with current ConnDOT Guidelines for Highway Design which is between the minimum and desirable sight line distances. However, the 650' sight line is closer to the desirable sight line value. For the southbound 85th percentile speed (48.6 miles per hour) the desirable sight line value is 732' and the minimum sight line value is 534'. For the northbound 85th percentile travel speed (49.9 miles per hour) the desirable sight line value is 770' and the minimum sight line value is 565'. The 650' sight line value looking to the north from the site driveway is the maximum obtainable sight line within the existing right-of-way due to the horizontal curve on Sullivan Avenue located north of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection. It is important to note that the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection has been located as far to the south as possible in order to provide the maximum sight line distance to the north. Looking to the south,the current plan indicates a 650' +sight line indicating that a sight line in excess of 650' is obtainable. Please note that the revised plan will reflect anew value of 770' which is consistent with the desirable sight line value contained in current ConnDOT's Guidelines for Highway Design. 96284\A I\GB M0905 A.W PD Coffes. RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 6, 1996 Page 5 The sight lines to be provided at the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection will provide sufficient distance to allow for safe entering and exiting traffic maneuvers at the intersection. Field observations have noted the near-by day care operation located to the north of the development site currently operates satisfactorily with an existing sight line distance looking to the north of approximately 400'. This sight line is limited by the horizontal curve in Sullivan Avenue to the north. Drainage Calculations Calculations comparing the TR-20 (TR-55)results to Rational method are attached. As noted, the two methods use different rainfall criteria, different coefficients and different time of concentration calculations. Therefore, similar peak flows are rare. Police Services At the location of the proposed intersection of Fieldstone Drive with Sullivan Avenue, Sullivan Avenue is approximately 36' in width providing 18' of pavement'in each direction. This width will allow by-pass capability of left turning vehicles into Fieldstone Drive for northbound Sullivan Avenue traffic. Although there is sufficient width for the by-pass capability, final review and approval by ConnDOT during the Encroachment Permit process may result in lane striping modifications to further enhance the by-pass capability. As noted in the original traffic assessment submittal, it is anticipated that approximately 12 vehicles will enter Fieldstone Drive during the p.m. peak hour. Of these 12 vehicles, 6 will be turning left from the northbound Sullivan Avenue travel stream. On average, one vehicle will turn left into Fieldstone Drive every 10 minutes. In consideration of the low trip generation associated with the subdivision and the by-pass capability available on Sullivan Avenue, it is anticipated that the proposed subdivision traffic will not disrupt the continuity of traffic flow or create an unsafe condition. WPCA Comments • Gravel access road revised to Town standard. • Structure to be relocated. • Water tight manhole frame and cover. • Detail shown on Sheet No. 11. 96284\A 1\GB M0905A.W PD Corres. RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 6, 1996 Page 6 • Sewer laterals are shown on the plans. • Slopes where shown on the construction plan and profile sheets as required in section III 1. & 14.b, d, & g of the subdivision regulations. • Detail of drop manhole on Pierce Road shown on Sheet No. 11. • Land developed to the south will be served by future sanitary sewer line thru lot 8. This will serve the lower elevation of the Priest property. • Clay stop detail has been revised to indicate that stops to be installed along the main line. Planning_Comments 1. Property owner shown within 500'. 2. Total acreage shown. Fee in lieu of open space.will be submitted by the applicant. 3. Parcel B is yet to be determined. Easement from Priest to RSK-Kellco shown. 4. The applicant will take the suggestion of tree type into consideration. In-Hours Development Review All items have been addressed. Please call me if you have any questions or need clarification of my responses. Sincerely yours, Guy B. Mitchell Associate Chief of Site Design /dmp 96284\A l\GBM0905A.W PD Corres. Test Pit Information by RSK-KELLCO Date: 5/31/96 Test Hole #1 0" - 12" light brown topsoil 12" - 36" yellow/brown silty/sand subsoil J-7 '/ `- 36" - 60" white silty/sand 60" - 96" red coarse sand No water Test Hole#2 0" - 12" light brown topsoil (sandy) - 12: - 30" yellow/brown subsoil 30" -42" white silty/sand f�� 42" - 84" red/brown sand (coarse) (some small stone) Water at 52" Test Hole #3 0" - 9" dark brown topsoil 9" - 24" yellow/brown sand /silt subsoil Y Y Y ._ • " ,�• 24" - 32" red/brown sand 32" - 60" dark brown hardpan Water at 56" Test Hole#4 0" - 10" light brown topsoil 10" - 28" yellow subsoil silty/sandy 28" -45" white/yellow sand 45" - 68" brown hardpan Water at 56" Test Hole#5 0" - 8" light sandy brown topsoil 8" - 26" yellow sandy subsoil - 26" - 36" white/yellow sand 36 60" red coarse sand 60" - 80" red/brown hardpan No water 962 84\A 1\G D M 0906 A.W P D Corres. froo PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers BY BY U L L l V oVV AV SHEET NO. l of _.. . j- } f ---.. -_. fil-bpPt 1 --•PAC _ t�i Slu .. > �- ,A G _ } i _--- � - --q 7 _. v�' �P •°v�, _t' '_lN� . I 1 s i i } I � , : A t I ! I - i I i 1 i } t , 1-_444 ------- AAA TY- I ( 1 I ^i 1 j } i 17, 1 , _; --i t �`,•C' 'i/L t>. t. 5. IWt_ I i !A.- j !� I La I L: l�. TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN FORM2.2 PROJECT yf DESIGNED BY q DATE STREET FIRM CHECKED BY SHEET No 831VMod3H w 14 so cr A1100-13n 30V83nd a �., 1, 3did d0 HION31 's � 4 3ZIS 3dld 0) Lf� �1,� Lr$ +�_ ILA W3ISASNIO act. A11SN31N1 -I-lVzJNlda ti ? tom M M P.) M Nr W31SAS NI r ri IV Ao Pins NISVe H01VO 1` N SNI»31N3 Id o, M j= o Q � s o 3W11 031d'inW onOOd v 4 a r o ; N4b 3dld NI 3W11 13'1N1 013W11 cu 1N31AI03S 3NI"1 — , - �- -9 __tj 40 T} , � -3 , � 9 PEE 33E 9 A N11 N R a#39 R3« c9J S#32lq . 9p. t P 8 y gR22« Q59RIq R9 » a9rL22; \ PROGRAM INPUT DATA: 729 m!» ~: a3E ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- Channel eg, §@t per ;Re....,...2G � y9 %@R/, R7beseRRd/! e-algR..../2. %g# 2£9Im@ Slope - 9R G& a7e2e9@RR£&§, ay eaRl Slide mge ' Right R@ m75m!»z9RR@%a 2,3 2#91RR# W#hwe9...,.. ! '......... 2 ! 299a SSL2! 9yhRR Rate VelmRyRR» aR62 sae Flow Area Top weh we k2! E2; Wwr a»ES 9w2R ;RJR mG ------------------------------ ------- \3 Q Cop %t& %g2 \77 » aa7. -------�---------------���—m—�---- 9JE2?l. RAgR & .qR q 9; P R% asl7� b klnS eag, ! R,3G9\ BG. 7015 w 5 6@\ /9, h 3t7, 9 211)97 E2l9Dg9. Amanual /b e2Hm5 & 5R a#EG g@16w. . aOa-seA � S K �- So.t�vr�vDs� �� �-� � �' � 1 z , � �; �_- �/� _, _ ,�. .`�. e REC�, 1Q�'6 f,: ,i a, SEQ �w�os°R ��' � . . � . L :_ �, _6b, - N INLET STATION AND OFFSET TIME TO INLET -p w AREA IN ACRES IV vl RUNOFF COEFFICIENT Pa Al SUM OF Al TOTAL Al • O 6 J j :� ;,, '% CD RAINFALL INTENSITY N a„ oq 0 TO INLET 4 N O ii-C o GRADE OF GUTTER p _ CROSS SLOPE OF SHOULDER DEPTH OF FLOW va C> AT GUTTER b� rwC tN. �} WIDTH OF FLOW 0 BYPASSING INLET " I o a p _ a .N • . N o (� t�'1 Q y a AI BYPASSING INLET • Al ENTERING CATCH BASIN oN 133HS A8 (13)133Ha Wald 13381S 31Va A8 03N91S3a 133(`02id I Z WaO� SISA'lVNd MOIzl >d3line 8OSONIM HinoS JO NMOl �O FUSS&O'Neill Inc. ConsultingEngineersPREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO _BY —7 Z BY *!� i SHEET NO. of y • t t t 1 e I rjvLtr, l ' 1f { I , I I I 17 kolo j. j-- • I F I ( I I . I � 2 , I --} L v s. _ _ _l I i ► �3 3_. -- . ;gig _ t t folooFUSS&O'Neill Inc. CnnsuhinqEngineers PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY BY Q SHEET NO. of Lt j� ' — -- — - _ f 1 j i- t ; `t -- - ----- - - 1 -4Ift -_44+t3 T LA SYL 1 i-- A l` t - ' ! 1 -- �- TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN FORM 2.2 PROJECT DESIGNED BY DATE STREET FIRM CHECKED BY SHEET No Suu,.�vA,N �U b M � a31dMOt13H11 A1I0dddO l7fld ''� a pO o-. 04 3a -i .:;r. • �• t4 rr -r .i•:l . N �. A110013A 3E)V83Ad :371- G 3d0'1S = ^ 43 Q © © V y V 3dld d0 HION3'1 3ZIS 3dld M 1013ISASNI0 m � AlISN31Nl llVdNlda ►� •o � IY'► 0% -`3 M M M W31SAS NI 07 .� NISV8 H01VO DNIa31N3 IV 3WI1 a3ivinr4no0t/ 3dld NI 3W11 M `v 131N1 0131N11 c-i zr 1 N 3 W 0 3 S 3 N I l �� F RSK - SULLIVAN AVE DETENTION The storm runoff for the proposed development would be piped directly to the Podunk River just downstream of Pierce Road. Based on "Natural Drainage Basins in Connecticut" prepared by Natural Resources Center of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, the watershed area of the Podunk River at the point in question is 2,590 acres. The area of the proposed development is 9.5 acres. Because of this large difference in areas, the site drainage could have no significant effect on peak flows in the Podunk River. A TR-20 computer run was done for peak flows for 10 and 25 year storms in the Podunk River with the present site and the developed site. As the attached calculations show, there is no change in the 10 year flow (814.6 cfs) and 0.1 cfs decrease in the 25 year flow (1100.2 to 1100.1 cfs). If detention was used, the peak flow from the site would be reduced, but the peak would occur closer to the peak in the Podunk River and would theoretically increase the peak flow in the river. Therefore, we recommend that detention not be used for the proposed site. 96248\A1\7000\GJM0701A.WP `Corres: Q FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT r BY BY l �S 1< _ .S'1.aGL.lVA.1✓ AVM SHEET NO I Of 4-1 1 --r it--;—� � it i - 1 - I 777 R;- III � y t ,: v s J a tic• w,� \s t�� r`£. ��i ��� +�*a�', �{-s k��fi'.' F� .r.��a' q� A a,.. 4�*!Y+ .f' ,1 * "i �*,x`€ ON-0 a s� } r' S r� c3� i t t 11, Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Td or travel time (Tt) Project i\ SK—SLA)NIN1 • 1 Mom• :By Date �Z7 Location - � Checked • Date Circle one: P sent Developed = 1 Circle one: c Tt through subarea NOTES: Space -for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. ' Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow to T (Applicable c oaly) Segment ID I. ' Surface description (•table 3-1) .....,,,,,,� 77- 2. Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) .. •�7 3. Flow length, L .(total L '< 300 ft) .......... ft 4. Twoyr 24-hr rainfall, P2 ,.,•............... . in 5. Land slope, s ....... ft/ft d 0.007 (nL)0.8 b. Tc' P 0.5 0-4 Compute Tc hr Shallow concentrated flow Segment-ID 7. Surface description (paved'or unpaved) v 8. Flow length, L .............................. ft Z,JO� 9. Watercourse elope, s ........................ ft/ft �Da� 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ft/s 11. T - L t 3600 V Compute Tc ...... hr • •+' - Channel flow Segment ID -12. Cross sectional flow:area,:a ........... -ft2 13 netted perSmeter, , •- - pw. _. . .- _ . ... ft. 14 Hydraulic radius, t - _a Compute c ` p ft -7777777 15. Channel slope, s .................. ft/ftf t .Hanging's .roughness:coeff n.-....r 17 1.49 V mput n ' ` =x�Co V' Jc e 5 tls. M1ti JKc £� 18. it Flow'`length L '. : L 19 T 3b00 V Compute TcN hrf + n t dub �20 -Water rrsubarea Tc'or T .;(add T p 1$ and j s�,ij �;�,a sra 7.?..;�k ., ,. i??-3 7..t-r.`'-yam "1a atCi steps;-6. 1� .� 19) thr `t�7�,. _ ' c (a .y, eT"i'�r;,, e� t'�41'} r)A1.Ti�t •$P 1. _ F'" ,�, '�P y_ r y� `3 v'1"+ . t 15 3&E ' -?ch L nd{€ ',<+ ' '' •,1' :i 3^K �` Nif�.ly+• �'a1r l ' 'WIT T. aM +.14.t�`.� "F,�t"_ S- a 'x ,� .'•w v �� + x..„5 � -i`E�i� i_ K} v ; ±+k � t&9a.t xy ,•Mto-� a£ 'R -k4 i �i -l$� �'. `�� i"h a.. tli ,L i A4„ f )s 1�r n'r Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (TC) or travel time (Tt) Project 5 K �c `( ld'MA ��/-P� By V"T/" 1 Date Location a �� � �s Checked Date Circle one: Presen Develo Circle one: Tc Tt rough subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............ Lace► 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft �• D 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in �al 5. Land slope, s ft/ft •©� 0.8 = 0.007 (nL) + a ►3T 6' ,Tt' -0.5 0.4 Compute Tt ...... hr P2s Shallow concentrated flow '.Segment ID r 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... paV4 8. Flow length, L ............................. . ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/f t 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s L�y 11. Tt ' 3600 V Compute Tt ...... hr OLl + t a i • Channel flow _ Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ............... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw :....................... ft a 14. Hydraulic radius, r:_ Computes`.:..::.` ft pw • 15. Channel slope; s ........................... ft/ft . 16. Manning's roughness coeff., n 1 49 r2/3 s1/2 •17. -V = n Compute V ft/s,, f f 18. Flow length, L ............................. ft 19. T = L Compute T hr " r t 3600TV ��; t • .. s 20. r•k : Watershed or subarea T orb- TA(add Tin�ateps 6,-`11, 'T• 1 '°' _j a"+ - € �'•r4g'•S•t_'7-C � �,s�r�-y ,� [• y� �f 's�Fat�� �r.��e�sc�s'? r+{ k �-.t �"x' _ n., �, .`,3"•' • '+c^ n C r f F. ..f} s y S t N ;r �R. tit �7i•na 4 i�y 4'r +IVrYf¢A�'+1 r•'.+. r5; { i'y �.;F �.t } .( .gi 4rT .. j`�F`''tfxi (.^' }•4 y - Rf' • rai'� < a r ' ''+yq'�[1 `'{cv..•:`,/ L J f: � {h5 - .r r�15.i1.: S�E"' �� ; i?4,rN i T•a y{_ ,yn�.t�` <p' ,- '^ "''Rr• F . fra 1 ♦ 9 d, 'ka•%.}s .,: 6�e YS'� t��� 4 f i••L� a n • .4a£ .s.tSr':A.}f4Y xt....-- Y.aY'2..,(`-_.c!..s'•:.�!m. ti'�ari.-bSs.,..^;.,st[':I:R 2 ... � C�� " �..•e - p.. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project 1`S S�it�� V��Vim. 4V' By (�•�/� Date 0C, - .77- Location �� �''��' �s��k� Checked Date Circle one; Pr ent Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) 2. .Manning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) 3. Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in 3� r 5. Land slope, s ..................0........a.. ft/ft 0.007 (nL)0.8 •3 O } a �'6. Tt 0.5 0.4 Compute Tt ...... hr PZ s Shallow concentrated flow »•'< =Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved)..... 8. Flow length, L ............................. ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s �.Li 11. Tt ' 3600 V Compute Tt. ...... • hr Channel flow Segment ID <12. Cross "sectional flow area, a ..::........... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw .............:...:..... ft 14. Hydraulic -radius, r'= pa Compute r ::... �. -ft w 15. Channel slope, s ................. ft/ft .16 Manning's roughness::.coeff., n ........... 2/3 _ 1/2 1 49 Y 17. V _ n Compute V ft/s 18. Flow length, L ............................. ft AN 19 T _ L Compute Tt` t 3600 'KV • ', . 20 ` Watershed for sabarea''_T for al(add t ,in tepss6, 11, and�19)4.� ..* . h � � .SHi�-vc 73n:, tEt '?•}; x'..A 1LN, �� 4,�'S✓t • `ijGy� d� .. `+, at• }*E "=s `t"ss�, y'�5.'"+F'M�!'a�{ .' )'- - Yige - « "� ::'� a :-• y,+t�om�'`, ° °.. � caa..,. s :{e ,y�#� Ajs .sat fl �`"+b .S,N- ' f210=VI-TZISS �e nn� Ed::June#1986� r �� � .sb � t r: Scn7 + F Qv L73 S X 799 -t- 3.L 15' 'LS I X� Zoo 1 -3S .L739 X N gDoFUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N BY f/ / BY /^ SVEET NO. SK �- S U LLLV P�> Av of I ---I oofotoe coel 4-W-,' tl AV r ----_ --�- �---a- 5.._��i.*Y� ��- L_��`t�.��_� .-�-`���__ . .,$� taco.-- - —•---- T17 ! I i - i , .- h: I S t: r•r {y ''ti �'�'.- tiS°` •S3' �,r. ¢. < #t'v41 . I9rt.R!&t 9af: &gEes Q9q :9f 9 E2!@ . . eaBr C 28 QR/2« � 27R: 2 2g 8323 %%s §22 F�9 2Rm ------------------------------------- im Channel Bottom Qg@ /giP# l2Ow......a.. .J9 %9H/sRR#28 @WRdrlev2@K.e....a .\gC S - ek\ SSChannel mea @ . 299I8# Slop« - Byte# m7R2QR,rb3H., aR , 2221Ree W#h §9g.Q.......&...e. �u . %R\ Rq R@ Velocity Rma al2Ry 2@ y R a Area 2R Weh . . . wS . Is) wp; Wwr w@we Aw§S !R R; Rg --------------------------------------- . G3 §B ba 011116 0,0421 b 72 «an 7,2 9aR85R 9aaR §QEgR q R99\ s6 & Ra4£e, Inc., #S w 24@R, V071H 7, 2 2 . E g! §39;gzA GReI W b equations & g @ char-, -is #@lQ9. . tOW N Sf4 C710-u�� C x C 9 ?40&U' L+ ?, m e C 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 Date: September 9, 1996 To: Fuss& Oneill Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT 06040 From: Jeffrey H. Folger Zoning/Wetland Officer Town of South Windsor Re: Review of Fieldstone Subdivision, Sullivan Avenue South Windsor dated 8/14/96. I have reviewed the site plans for the proposed Fieldstone Subdivision with the following comments: 1. The construction sequence calls for erosion controls to be placed around catchbasins. This should be shown on the conservation plan also. 2. Additional silt fence should be installed along the southern property boundary abutting the Grant property to minimize possibility of sediment impacts to that property. 3. The application calls for the stormwater discharge structure to be located partially on abutting property. The land owner of that property must also sign the wetland application. 4. The stormwater outlet structure should address stormwater quality as well as quantity or velocity. Biofilters should be incorporated in the design of the outfall to be the first line of defense in minimizing impacts of nutrients, hydrocarbons and heavy metals. cc. Town Engineer Town Planner IWA/CC RSK Kellco 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040-5921 TEL 86o 646-2469 FAX 86o 643,6313 1200 Converse Street,Longmeadow,MA 01106-1721 TEL 413 567-9886 FAX 413 567-8936 Providence,RI TEL 401 828-3510 00010 FUSS&O Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers Solid Waste Management Environmental Engineering Industrial/Hazardous Waste Management Wastewater Management September 9, 1996 Stream Impact Analysis Site Planning/Engineering I� Water Resources Engineering Hydrogeology Transportation Engineering Park Design Ms. Marcia A. Banach Environmental Field Services Surveying Director of Planning Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: RSK-KELLCO, Inc. Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT Dear Marcia: The following are Fuss & O'Neill's and the applicant's responses to the staff s comments concerning the Fieldstone subdivision. Comments by Jerry Iazzetto Sheet 2 1. Items added Sheet 3 1. Bearings and distances added. 2. Peachbrooke Drive shown. 3. Parcel "B"included in lot no. 3. 4. Easement identified more clearly. 5. Proposed road name changed to "Heritage Drive". Sheets 4 & 5 1. Underdrain was shown parallel to contours in the cul-de-sac. We are determining the need for underdrain on both sides of the road based on test pit information. 2. As shown,the flow arrows indicate swales between houses where appropriate. Contours have been adjusted to create a more positive Swale between lots 6 thru 96284\A i\GBM0905A.WPD Corres. Q Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engine,, RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 9, 1996 Page 2 8 and lots 10 thru 14. Lots 3, , 4 and 5 slope away from the rear of the houses. An insignificant amount of surface flow crosses the rear of lot 9 from lot 10. 3. Notes added to address issues. 4. Manhole added. 5. Footing drains and sanitary laterals added. 6. 6' stub added. 7. The riprap ditch is on a 0.20% grade with modified riprap and wetlands plantings. This results in a velocity of 1.6 fps which can easily be accommodated in the ditch, and the ditch will soon evolve into a wetland with wetland growth. 8. Storm pipe was placed in the location shown to disturb as little of the existing tree line as possible. However,I did adjust the storm drain T to the west. This will give a 12' distance between pipes. This will leave plenty of room for future installation of the sanitary line. 9. From CB#8 to Culvert End #13, the pipe grades have been flattened which results in the following velocities: 8-10 10.2 fps 10-11 6.0 fps 11-12 8.2 fps 12-13 5.7 fps 10. The sedimentation structure has a 18" pipe entering it. Normally with a"Type 1" structure, an 18" pipe would go to the chamber with a larger pipe bypassing excess flows. At this site, there is no excess flow to bypass. 11. Gravel access road revised to.Town standards. Locking manhole frame and cover detail added. . 12. Slopes where shown on the construction plan and profile sheets as required in section III 1. & 14.b, d, & g of the subdivision regulations. Slopes added on other sheets as requested. 9628AA 1\GBM0905A.W PD Corres. R� Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulling Engineers RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 9, 1996 Page 3 13. Catch basin added. 14. Revised to "ADSN12". 15. Manhole added. 16. Temporary grading rights shown. 17. Grades adjusted. 18. See comment 12 above. Pipe sizes shown. 19. Peachbrooke Drive labeled. 20. Sanitary line shown. 21. Test pits were be taken by the applicant and results will be submitted to the Town. (Attached) 22. Radius shown. 23. Land developed to the south will be served by future sanitary sewer line thru lot 8. This will serve the lower elevation of the Priest property. 24. A-2 certification shown. Sheet 6 l. Inverts shown. When the sanitary service lateral connection bend is installed at the main line location shown on the plan, the invert elevation is automatically set. 2. Finished floor elevation shown. 3. According to field location of utilities, the proposed manhole will clear 15" RCP, both horizontally and vertically. 4. Drop detail shown on sheet no. 10 5. Additional clean out shown. 96284\A(\GBM0905A.WPD Comes. 3A0 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 9, 1996 Page 4 6. Sanitary lateral shown, see comment 7 7. Footing drains shown. Sheet 11 1. Watertight, locking manhole cover detail added to sheet no. 11. Sheet 12 1. Design note added. Traffic Assessment The sight distances referenced in the Traffic Assessment and shown on the plans were specified in consideration of the 85th percentile speed for traffic traveling on Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection. The 85th percentile speed data was obtained from ConnDOT which indicates 49.9 miles per hour northbound and 48.6 miles per hour southbound. The 650'sight line noted on the plan corresponds to a sight line value in accordance with current ConnDOT Guidelines for Highway Design which is between the minimum and desirable sight line distances. However, the 650' sight line is closer to the desirable sight line value. For the southbound 85th percentile speed (48.6 miles per hour) the desirable sight line value is 732' and the minimum sight line value is 534'. For the northbound 85th percentile travel speed (49.9 miles per hour) the desirable sight line value is 770' and the minimum sight line value is 565'. The 650' sight line value looking to the north from the site driveway is the maximum obtainable sight line within the existing right-of-way due to the horizontal curve on Sullivan Avenue located north of the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection. It is important to note that the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection has been located as far to the south as possible in order to provide the maximum sight line distance to the north. Looking to the south,the current plan indicates a 650' +sight line indicating that a sight line in excess of 650' is obtainable. Please note that the revised plan will reflect a new value of 770'which is consistent with the desirable sight line value contained in current ConnDOT's Guidelines for Highway Design. The sight lines to be provided at the proposed Fieldstone Drive intersection will provide sufficient distance to allow for safe entering and exiting traffic maneuvers at the 96254\A 1\GBM0905A.WPD Coires. Q Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 9, 1996 Page 5 intersection. Field observations have noted the near-by day care operation located to the north of the development site currently operates satisfactorily with an existing sight line distance looking to the north of approximately 400'. This sight line is limited by the horizontal curve in Sullivan Avenue to the north. Drainage Calculations Calculations comparing the TR-20 (TR-55)results to Rational method are attached. As noted, the two methods use different rainfall criteria, different coefficients and different time of concentration calculations. Therefore, similar peak flows are rare. Police Services At the location of the proposed intersection of Fieldstone Drive with Sullivan Avenue, Sullivan Avenue is approximately 36' in width providing 18' of pavement in each direction. This width will allow by-pass capability of left turning vehicles into Fieldstone Drive for northbound Sullivan Avenue traffic. Although there is sufficient width for the by-pass capability, final review and approval by ConnDOT during the Encroachment Permit process may result in lane striping modifications to further enhance the by-pass capability. As noted in the original traffic assessment submittal, it is anticipated that approximately 12 vehicles will enter Fieldstone Drive during the p.m.peak hour. Of these 12 vehicles, 6 will be turning left from the northbound Sullivan Avenue travel stream. On average, one vehicle will turn left into Fieldstone Drive every 10 minutes. In consideration of the low trip generation associated with the subdivision and the by-pass capability available on Sullivan Avenue, it is anticipated that the proposed subdivision traffic will not disrupt the continuity of traffic flow or create an unsafe condition. WPCA Comments • Gravel access road revised to Town standard. • Structure to be relocated. • Water tight manhole frame and cover. • Detail shown on Sheet No. 11. • Sewer laterals are shown on the plans. 96284\A 1\GDM0905A.WPD cones. Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers RSK-KELLCO Subdivision September 9, 1996 Page 6 • Slopes where shown on the construction plan and profile sheets as required in section III 1. & 14.b, d, & g of the subdivision regulations. Slopes added on others as requested. • Detail of drop manhole on Pierce Road shown on Sheet No. 11. • Land developed to the south.will be served by future sanitary sewer line thru lot 8. This will serve the lower elevation of the Priest property. • Clay stop detail has been revised to indicate that stops to be installed along the main line. Planning. Comments 1. Property owner shown within 500'. 2. Total acreage shown. Fee in lieu of open space will be submitted by the applicant. 3. Parcel B is included as part of lot no. 3. Easement from Priest to RSK-Kellco shown. 4. The applicant will take the suggestion of tree type into consideration. In-Hours Development Review All items have been addressed. Please call me if you have any questions or need clarification of my responses. Sincerely yours, I�• Guy B. itchell Associate Chief of Site Design /dmp 96284\A 1\GBM0905A.WPD Cones. Test Pit Information by RSK-KELLCO Date: 5/31/96 Test Hole #1 .0" - 12" light brown topsoil 12" - 36" yellow/brown silty/sand subsoil 36" - 60" white silty/sand 60" - 96" red coarse sand No water Test Hole #2 0" - 12" light brown topsoil (sandy) 12: - 30" yellow/brown subsoil 30" -42" white silty/sand 42" - 84" redibrown sand (coarse)(some small stone) Water at 52" Test Hole #3 0" - 9" dark brown topsoil . 9" -24" yellow/brown sandy/silty subsoil 24" - 32" red/brown sand 32" - 60" dark brown hardpan Water at 56" Test Hole #4 0" - 10" light brown topsoil 10" - 28" yellow subsoil silty/sandy 28" - 45" white/yellow sand 45" - 68" brown hardpan Water at 56" Test Hole#5 0" - 8" light sandy brown topsoil 8" - 26" yellow sandy subsoil 26" - 36" white/yellow sand 36" - 60" red coarse sand 60" - 80" red/brown hardpan No water 96284\A I\GBM0906A.WPD Corres. MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: September 10, 1996 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the revised drawings dated 9-6-96 for the proposed Fieldstone Subdivision and have the following comments : Sheet 4 & 5 �. Underdrains should be placed on both sides of road from station 5+40 to cul-de-sac and around the cul-de-sac. Soils (EOA, EOB & ESA) have high groundwater tables. 2 . Proposed sanitary easement to Pierce Road shows a driveway within it . The easement documents should indicate that the Town will not be responsible for any repairs to the driveway if repair of pipe or manhole is necessary, however, it is preferred that no driveway be within the easement . There is a concern about the proposed connection to sanitary sewer in Pierce Road. When the main was installed the soil encountered was very yielding causing many problems, K including losing a manhole and pipe. The developer should have special measures in place to deal with this problem. 4 . Roof leaders not addressed. 5 . Sanitary manhole 6A should have a 6 ' (min. ) stub placed for future main to the southwest . r6� A "Type 1" sedimentation structure should be used at X structure 11 because of the high velocities . 7 . A gravel access road should be shown for the storm and sanitary "cross country" pipes . Note should indicate locking manhole covers are to be used. 8 . Pull offs at the street line will be required for proposed driveways on lots 12 and 13 . 9 . Catch basin ##7 information not complete on Storm Drainage Data chart . 10 . Pavement radius of the cul-de-sac should be indicated. 11 . Labeling of "Sanitary and Storm Sewer Easement" is overlaid on storm pipe and is not clear. 12 . Sanitary manhole 3A should be moved to position it in center of "Future Road" . Marcia A. Banach Re : Fieldstone September 10, 1996 Sheet 6 1 . Inverts are required for sanitary laterals and footing drains both at the houses and at the main. A test hole should be dug in Pierce Road where proposed sanitary manhole is to be placed. It appears that a possible conflict with the storm pipe may exist . 3 . All foundation drain pipe under the proposed road must be 4 . It should be noted that locking, watertight manhole covers are to be used in "cross country" mains . Traffic Assessment It is felt that the required intersection sight distances should be based upon ConnDOT desirable intersection sight distances which would be 750 feet (using 49 . 9 MPH as design speed for Sullivan Avenue) . When desirable sight distances are measured they are measured at a point 20 feet back from the edge of pavement . The maximum sight distance provided, looking north, is 650 feet at 12 feet back from the edge of pavement . There is no indication on drawing as to what the sight distance would be at 20 feet back from the pavement . The applicant should provide this information so that we can evaluate this properly. The sight distance provided, looking south, is 770 feet . the note on sheet 6 indicates that 11 (20 ' setback can be maintained looking south) " . I would assume that this means that 770 foot sight distance is also at 20 feet back from pavement . If this is not true, please have applicant clarify. JCl/j sv va!!ez/JC1961MAEMEMOS/fie&stone9-10 RSK-KELLEUINC. + Developers Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 203-644-8761 / 644-8140 Fax: 203-644-5650 September 10, 1996 - eel p Ms. Marcia Banach SEP 10 1996 Director of Planning Town of South Windsor South Windsor 1540 "Sullivan Avenue planning & Zoningn Commissio South Windsor, CT 06074 Re:- Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Marcia: Per our conversation, attached is a copy of the appraisal that has been completed by Morra Associates to determine the Fee in Lieu of Open Space for the above project. If you have. any: questions or comments, please call. Si cerely, - Carol S. Kell We Build Our Reputation <::_�;flona C-1 1iodatei ' Real Estate Appraisers 624 Talcottville Road ' Vernon, CT 06066 Robert Morra Telephone (203) 875-6201 Michael Aletta Fax (203) 872-9663 ' August 16, 1996 Richard Kellol ' RSK Kellco Inc. 1750 Ellington Road ' South Windsor, Ct 06074 Re: Appraisal of property 1363 Sullivan Avenue ' South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kell Pursuant to your request a personal inspection and appraisal was made of land located at the rear of 1363 Sullivan Avenue, in the town ' of South Windsor, Connecticut. The subject consists of a 9.2 +/- acre parcel of land improved with a single family dwelling. The dwelling on the minimum required ' lot of 40, 000 s/f will not be appraised. The remaining 8. 3 +/- acres of raw land represents the property being appraised. ' The 8.3 acre is basically a level hay lot. The subject parcel being appraised has a minimal 175 feet of frontage on Sullivan Avenue. The subject is appraised "as is" raw land in a rural residential ' zoning district. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting subject ' value. It is my opinion based on my analysis the subject 8. 3 +/- acre of "as is" as of August 16, 1996 is $50, 000. 00. FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Respectfully submitted, R/e/t'o . Mo r r a 1 ' PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL ' The purposes of this appraisal report is to establish an estimated fair market value of the subject property, 8. 3 +/- acres of raw land as of the date of my inspection, August 16, 1996. The appraisal report is to be used by the Town of South Windsor in determining an open space fee on the subject lot. ' DEFINITION FEE SIMPLE ESTATE Absolute ownership of Real Estate that is unincumbered by any other interest or estate and is subject to the limitations of eminent ' domain, escheat, police power, and taxations. "Income Property Appraisal" ' Jeffrey D. Fisher & Robert S. Martin Dearborn Financial Publishing, Inc. 1991 Page #3 " -1- ' DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE ' An analysis was made to establish an Estimated Fair Market Value. Definition of Market Value - as defined by the financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) : ' The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently and ' knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller ' to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) Buyer and seller are typically motivated; ' (2) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; ' (3) A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open . market; (4) Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and ' (5) The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. ' The Market Value estimated in this report reflects a hypothetical sale as of the date of the appraisal. -2- ' TOWN DATA ' SOUTH WINDSOR. Hartford County.-(Form of government, town manager, town council. ) -Inc. , May, 1845; taken from East Windsor. Area, 28.5 sq. miles. Population, est. , 21,800. Voting districts, 6. Children, ' 2,486. Principal industries, fuel cell power plants, automatic numerically controlled drafting machines, digitizers, graphic systems, CAD/CAM systems, photoplotters, artwork generators, electronic and electromechanical controls for aircraft and missle field modular power ' supplies, computer controlled cloth cutters, automatic grading and market systems, jet engine/aerospace parts and components, precision machine parts, commercial printing and typesetting, bricks, waste disposal incinerators, fin tube radiation, microflake cigar binders and wrappers, heat transfer decorations, pressure sensitive labels, store fixtures, precious metal recovery, agriculture. Transp.-Passenger: Served by buses of Post Road Stages, Inc. from Hartford and Stafford Springs, and Conn. Transit from Hartford to East Windsor Hill. Freight: Served by Conrail and numerous motor common carriers. Post offices, South Windsor; South Windsor R.F.D. 1, 2, 3 and 4; East ' Windsor Hill and Rockville R.F.D. 3 . -3- ' NEIGHBORHOOD ' The subject is located along Sullivan Avenue, a two lane state highway, Route 194. The subject has a day care center and small office building north of the subject. The subject also abutts an undeveloped woodlands and wetlands area to the north. The area to the west of the subject is developed with moderate single family homes. The area to the south of the subject is open farm land. The area across the street from the subject contains a PUD single ' family home development, several single family homes, and a professional office complex. ' The subject is 1/4 mile from the Town Hall, and Post Office and 1/2 +/- mile to local shopping area. The subject is convenient to local schools and employment centers. -4- 1 i 1 iLEGAL REFERENCE 1 The subject is in the name of Hee and Chun Sik Choi. The property is described in Volume 371 at page 298 of the Town of South Windsor Land Records. ' ASSESSMENT Since the subject is assessed as excess acres. The current 1 assessment is $24, 020. The assessment is based on 70% of 1994 appraisal value. ' ZONING The subject is located in a RR Rural Residential Zone District. 1 The District allows for developement of single family dwellings. Minimum lot requirements Lot size 40, 000 s/f 1 Lot frontage 175 feet The property being appraised is currently open farmland and in ' complience with local zoning. 1 1 i 1 1 1 -5- 1 1 i 1 1 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL 1 The appraisal report will consider all factors which effect the subject value as of August 16, 1996. The appraisal report will value the subject as an 8.3 +/- acres parcel of raw land in a rural residential zone. The following investigations and analysis were made by the appraiser. i1. The subject was physically inspected on August 16, 1996. All available public information, including zoning regulation, Town of South Windsor assessment data, and records of the Town Clerk's office was examined. 2 . The area markets were reviewed for sales of improved property 1 similar to the subject 3. The area markets were reviewed for sales of unimproved land. 4. The market data approach will be developed and analyzed. i5. A final conclusion and determination of value was made. 1 1 1 1 1 -6- 1 1 ' SITE DESCRIPTION ' The subject is located on the westerly side of Sullivan Avenue. The parcel has 175 +/- feet of street frontage. The subject has a maximum dept of 1, 605 +/- feet and an average width of 500 feet. The ' total area is 8.3 +/- acres. The subject is at grade along the street then gradually slopes down toward the rear line. The subject has a drop in elevation of 30 ' +/- feet. The subject is mostly open hay lot with wooded area around the perimeter. The subject has no improvements. The subject has sewer and public water available at the street as well as electrical and ' telephone services. See attached map for details. The subject does not appear to be ' in a designated wetlands or in a Flood Hazard area. See attached Flood Hazard Map #090036-0004-B dated May 1, 1980. Zone "C". The subject is not considered a building lot but is considered ' excess acreage. The subject is appraised "as is" acreage. 1 -7- ' HIGHEST AND BEST USE ' The subject is presently an 8.3 +/- acre parcel of undeveloped land. The subject is in a rural residential zone. The subject "as is" has sufficient frontag one building lot. ' The subject could be developed into single family building lot. Such a developement would require the construction of a new street extending at least 700 feet. The maximum number of potential lots at a ' minimum 40, 000 s/f per lot is 7 lots. The cost of street construction made such a development economically non feasible. The subject's as is highest and best use is for development as a large single family ' building lot. 1 -8- 1 ' APPROACHES TO VALUE ' The traditional basic methods or techniques by which data may be processed into an indication of value: ' COST APPROACH - That approach in appraisal analysis which is based on the proposition that the informed purchaser would pay no more than the cost of producing . a substitute property with the same utility as the subject property. It is particularly applicable when the property ' being appraised involves relatively new improvements which represent the highest and best use of the land or when relatively unique or specialized improvements are located on the site and for which there ' exists no comparable properties on the market. DIRECT SALES COMPARISON APPROACH - That approach in appraisal analysis ' which is based on the proposition that an informed purchaser would pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an existing property with the same utility. This approach is applicable when an active market provides sufficient quantities of reliable data which can be ' verified from authoritative sources. The direct sales comparison approach is relatively unreliable in an inactive market or in estimating the value properties for which no real comparable sales data t are available. It is also questionable when sales data cannot be verified with principles to the transaction. Also referred to as the Market Comparison or Market Data Approach. ' INCOME APPROACH - That procedure in appraisal analysis which• converts anticipated benefits (dollar income or amenities) to be derived from the ownership of property into a value estimate. The income approach ' is widely applied in appraising income - producing properties. Anticipated future income and/or reversions are discounted to a present worth figure through the capitalization process. ' AMERICAN INSTITUTION OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS/SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS Revised Edition Real ' Estate Appraisal Terminology, ed. Byrl N. Boyce (Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1981) , p. 63, 79, and 132 . t -9- 1 ' APPROACH TO VALUE ' The three approaches to value were considered. The cost approach to value was not used since the subject has no improvements. The income approach to value was not used since the subject generates no ' income and has no significant income potential. The market data or sales comparison approach to value will be developed and analyzed. The subject will be compared to several area land sales. The sales will be adjusted to the subject for difference. 1 -10- r r r r • COMPARABLE SALES rSale #1 Location: 8 Clark Street, Map 25 Lot 31 rLot size: 14 +/- acres Lot frontage: 980 +/- feet rZone: R.R. ' Site description: Rectangular Lot; 50-60% has a CL&P R.O.W. across it. The northerly portion has a stream through it and has wetlands area around it rSales price: $80, 000 Price per acre: $5,714.00 rDate of sale: 11/18/95 Grantor: J. Lawrence Grantee: H. Czernek ' Volume: 829 Page: 114 rComments: It appears 25% to 30% is developable. r r 1 1 r -11- 1 20 0. F.03 0 0.00a•. V O.Mae. fls,• ir,�,Y 0.— -23 I 1 /-���'� •// f •'+o..co.:. O.bif. 4 ~ / 2 .iw r y N I ,k Vy, O.lMal + ` `f O.a•a.. ti, w 1 'ar 2{) fit yy O.7.M., 17 a.T V a, y/i j i LNac 4 . 102 J . O.Naa V. •• 1 so O.Nac 14•i Y a'Iy O.N4 ~ .�•Y 7L204 e 1 • a o.x.. w t i• 1 afOY y^n e.x4. w w u I,. +, dlo..w. ♦ ' °7� LEGEND 0.r � { a ~ o.sor. , r e• f l� o.na.. 10 I is O.•W.J ay, `�/ ;..ac 1r\ 14 ff„1 „ 11 0.104. K104 2 ibry , O.x_T)a. 4 O.faaa 1 •> M 11 lay Z< �• Lat as R 26a + O.M ,•.11+ p sal ♦ •.•• 1 ,•. /y, a ia. W wvlw.ut w \/\ s 0 4♦ . Iw ,°.r 1 ;O ; "' /yf 0.00b htV J a•aw»Ne.•a "\ • O.IT O.N•e C/ •� 0.!4. J It •�; . 1 a ,MMI,M•u«---__ ` 4. } J \y, •'- it .'� 01j/Y� IfJ O K 1tC. ty9 i O.Wi•. 77 Ia, !t. n.R r.».• >0 a..o.. r c • to sr'q 0 0.7aN. ♦a O.lOac. a S //1 ♦ 0.•r4 p♦•I ro7 1 curt a. W ` O.Na• , •'i d n- Tr �� ! _„r�N100, s99 ' +/ , VY al mwu 0.7,4. II ♦ 0.'NY.. ''` 3{7Y ✓-... tr 0.7T4 O C. r, -, '�•a C O.N4 a•. IN >i / ♦•. • \\ „Nru K,2Ma n ass �, In ♦ 6` 20.7.— yo o S ��' !, S } a%r- ; 1/O34 ♦' .wlo,nr••a to�.e., ` ♦ o.x,r} � } ;'6.axe.i' J »r / � 1\ w.+N..ol 7 {}14 �` „ MN 4 i j • ; ,Mtla�,• fAtr r•r0 IaNI a.2Nc2 'o.7aY. Z so A, i w _ .! waar ro»w ..• w O.W4-:a. i r 2 R 30 -,• 00 SO.O tea'••• `` 70 .7. a 03 11 _ 0.• v 0.7T4. r• :O..Oa•.311 02 w h l 0.79Ni =70 � �`• s {{ a rr»1 1 af:�t 20.2e•cicT .a % % �� ' ♦ %!~ $ _ •. ,�.. ft is OO..a _ .:.,, •i o3i +'i o..�i..`f: o.i+ac .• •„� Q �` ����.,�,1 �.... ............... Itotal e.xas a fy,r � 0.47 aa:; � J .� �'\� i e.x.a{ olt2. n e.asaa 41 t / J +�0.77ac / I �Fi OUINN ASSOCIAT w .tr i ia• o.so4 cry a. Mif XR �I� a rY! 4�=�� ft 7s �p w f -r Na1sN.r.raNNsnruw. t ►,s Taal / / 'e ��P� /•' "+ � t 133V I VO Ar r, • Mn72 *O.M4�r 1Qr•2• �/ • /j SI fa/ '/`v'� J 1O t 1 0.79af. °a 4,A 20 J O.aaac TO - •a C.Y.c. Ow, r0.7a/a Tt o.xr - / , r..«a. , / FFO aM•.t.L.P as a. f e.x.. a • �• �i a10 �iOpt,`ti w.r »n_•.y 0.7a.a / / 4 � 3� Lam-"_°J 2' N'•'-a• � ` = 1 -Y 4.tfa 1 ,'a.�rrr s s 4.xi�. / _ % 3 f r•t--�"" 4� , �"�yt.••a•• 44 •o.7aa• s•l:T as• f o.aw.! ».r 0.7..e / �l�.,1 "++( f" .{ KEY TO SHEETS 44 52 1• ar,. J tN0 I / / Te1fN Of fOUTN NIND001 n•1••M•... •arrta •�•��urn.rrs.sN w .• •I t w MT[01,NNp0a,MT•Ya,1aM 3Q ts" ,r,rlm a �?• fNEET 25 Of 110 • 1 Sale #2 ' Location: Rear 44 Main Street Lot size: 4.5 +/- acres ' Frontage: None, rear lot Zone: A40 Site description: The subject is a rectangular vacant lot set back 900 +/- feet from the street. ' Sales price: $10,000.00 ' Price per acre: $2,222.00 Date of sale: 9/20/95 ' Grantor: Levack Grantee: J.E. Shepard Company ' Volume: 859 ' Page: 91 Comments: The parcel was purchased by an abutter. -13- 1 1 �o;�h Sfire� i 1 1 1 i 1 Comp 2 i i 1 i a3y 1 -14- 1 i 1 1 Sale #3 1 Location: Abbe Road Extension, Map 102 Page 65 Lot Size: 11.76 +/- acres ' Frontage: 600 +/- feet 1 Zone: R.R. Description: undeveloped land located at the end of Abbe Road extension. The subject has a stream 1 running through it and a wetlands area. Sales Price: $110,000.00 1 Price per acre: $9,354.00 Date of Sale: 6/3/94 1 Grantor: Philip Ireland 1 Grantee: Ireland Family Limited Partnership Volume: 796 ' Page: 283 1 1 1 1 1 i -15- 1 n / • • e.Nw S.M/a e.N/i O.NOa I.Oea ffl �s LN4 w r rr rr • • NOOK to N O! • s rsf rr M •° eaoea r•� • f.ta4. • � O r „ r► • • � r S.t1•a f ! O + I N M M ~ O.waa O.Oaaa O.NO• O.fYa e.waa ONaa ° e r I.NOa + • •O.Naa 2 I.N4 f, Y �O.et4 • M1 nll O.N4. O.NOa = • St I M an 11w /� aw J e.tT•a ----err l • bN ~ `• �• v w •► '7 f -- e.Nr y O + w LEGEND ... -0 ROAD a law OO rI y M + i h�I.Maa • �/• xf }_~ L«ni.. o.Naa d I•A 1•w•IRIa[--- e.Nr i`M11 l W O.N 4. o f I 4' 1UanYh/•M M 40 1 O.O 3i4 °7 °. f e.N4 t a4 O.•Ooy Ofoaa O.Opaa /• t rK "{� I ! et 1 1 l•Oifaa l ♦y tMNw/rra•r t • --LtOaa— t 4 *' ~-. •' a -- —_ ...•. 1'1 Llatiaa • LNM. Naa ♦ I ♦ �, as w.. { 10 30 N nuts.. b 0704 / S Y N � � 1 Dan If•O.Naa � Ll11a • i O.b4. ! _ O.NM. W.I 'RI Ja 2e " • ♦l t * �, / ; 4a4rw —Est..— Yq 00 i l l �itaa♦ . 11 O.••4. a ♦ ...f �,, P ,� a+4 7f , ♦ ,qi Owa4 ;N O.ti.a ♦ \�\ In•1 i O.N4..d �.•, l • �EeMAE 0.0T4 y/ ^' Mal \ • >T _ elm' aOlao--- 20.34c 7f L•tE a"+ I- STREET `.r J' A f Lt as y •. W •..rls ae•a.0 b.a...l O.aW vim, r. 30 ! LN•a Tatrr••ol t M �..74 004. , 1 ~ .•.L»ia. `1.Oen r • •/ yN MI MI Y• K i 0 a4.ft OI t^rT rae nNl + ��' -V\ • Lq4 71 J • tir• I.N4 1N4. Im s.or r. O.T4 r f •,; ir O.N4 j !1 A �. , � wroarov r, t� 7 h .� 1 �rra. (/) •.w ..r •.+7 36 !!• • ° �M O.Mlla l� f + f .....w.w.r..r....« �.. T O.N4 , O N4 Z �, S • to !! !. • a /y O.000a O.N4 "r`r^'• To I.N4 fe on 1I ••'lMl 4 i ,• +rw of Lfoi a QUINN ASSOCIATE! • 0.9*4. 0.01" j ♦ I I A 1 � � N r.• rA W Lb4 _ •.W M a to f.]04 O.It4 on►p 3 1 S• t \ a.ro4. KEY TO SHEETS 3 93 Id 10a 10! N b 3 7oew N SOUTH wwo" NTS N PW?GMAP n M11En a0,1°N Tr.aaa r a! 1 I !MEET OO 0.so ' Sale #4 ' Location: 175 Lawrence Street, Map 129 Lot 11 Lot Size: 31.7 acre ' Frontage: 830 feet Zone: R.R. Description: The parcel is an undeveloped lot with an area of wetlands in the center portion. ' Sales Price: $200,000.00 Price per acre: $6, 309. 00 ' Date of Sale: 4/18/84 ' Grantor: A. Trudeau Grantee: Dart Hill Realty Inc. ' Volume: 786 Page: 262 t -17- t t [tLINfpO rNl N07M �I{ff0{ M w r;. ♦ 77 ' 0.7 0.f]M. 7Y. 7011•1 Z LqY. 1URN auM 74 1 f a o.nr� IS 1,3 >i 14 \ 1 err a 0.Nt•. s 1 i O fOfl. 6.24" S. is _ 0.7)Ic ♦ r r 7 �S Ilw r.r w•r`.+r 4fOts � {2 L � MAO M.707K • {.ffM. 1 rl «rr It ' " S N a •• i N 74 93 4 \• .«r 7a1 17 .} r• _ ww.�. n i 0.70" 0.64 73- � •.L 0.7t M. {{ {a . \ 1 !� O •rN 0.t1k 0.1aM. 1=K \ _ 10 aTOM I«n r IN11�.= I� N«1 \ S SPINNERS 120M. \ •+ er 4 \ riseIt ' rr~+ r.rINN r r0»I 47 as to 70 ` Y0 4. 21 • {.fe Y. O.7.ta L {I)M. a72f4 .r. f 90 4 O.NY. . » ' w r� .aK rK rr .r rf 0.7f4 O.$)M 0.NK aa11.so&. • wr 02MY -_ ai rwf of t 0.NM. IA2M 2 CLIffNOOD DRIVE '^ NI NR f N L a 11 f , •• - 0.7fY M. _ ef:M. 1.70 ,; �K 2 I.fO M. •\ , [ .! 7 I.N4 Y _. wr OfS M. r .. ..�� rr n < .rrrr.•i� .. •` as as ss n w 07 / t 0.NK 0.NK 0.Nfa 1 it, {NM. Of3K / rrr .. �..�+.,r" •1 Irl 1.71 IIN INI NN •• 44 9.0 j SPINNERS %� a:! N �•• _� 200]tc rw no I«I Iftl W.K 90 79 7a = 77 70 i aas4 5, O.tf4 aff4 a,"" OMAL f IAt4 f •1 N .I r 1� M �2 q s_D.w4.I fl .rt sl as 2 33 4 aait• Ni ""• 4.fo{t a• N 3 a�)Y. 1►•f YI f2 7 a. ! - 1.23K II ' ADJUSTMENTS ' The sales were adjusted to the subject for difference. The sales were adjusted on a per acre basis. ' Sale #1, 8 Clark Street, $5,714.00 per acre was adjusted: + $2,000. 00 Site conditions: The sale has 300 feet. wide CL&P R.O.W. and a wetlands area 35% - $2, 000. 00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 25% + $1, 150. 00 Location: Subject superior to sale 20% ' + $1, 150.00 Net adjustment $6,864. 00 Adjusted per acre value ' Sale #2, Rear 44 Main Street, $2,222 .00 per acre was adjusted: + $2, 000. 00 Frontage: Sale has no frontage ' + $1,000.00 Location: Sale is 900 feet from street + $3, 000. 00 Net adjustment ' $5,222. 00 Adjusted value per acre 1 t -19- ' Sale #3, Abbe Road Extension 9 354.00 per acre was adjusted$ p � sted - $3, 300.00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 35% ' + $1, 000.00 Site Condition: sale has an area of wet lands 10% $ 500.00 Time: Sale occured 26 months ago, land value ' depreciated 5% $2,800. 00 Net adjustment ' $6,554. 00 Adjusted value Sale #4, 175 Lawrence Street, $6, 309. 00 per acre was adjusted: $2,200. 00 Frontage. Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 35% ' + $1,500.00 Site condition: Sale has an area of wetlands, 25% ' - $ 300.00 Time: Sale occured 28 months ago, land value depreciated 5% - $1, 000.00 Net adjustment $5,309. 00 Adjusted value per acre ' The adjusted sales indicated values of $5,222 . 00, $5, 309. 00, $6,554.00 and $6,864. 00. ' The sales all bracket the subject value. The adjusted sales tend to indicate a value between $5,500. 00 to $6, 500.00. It is my opinion the subject per acre value is $6, 000. 00. -20- t ' CONCLUSION AND RECONCILIA TION ' The subject is an 8.3 +/- acre parcel of raw land located in an R.R. zone. The subject "as is" is not an approved building lot but is a parcel of land with potential to be developed as a building lot. The ' subject's highest and best use was determined to be as a single family building lot. The market data approach was developed. Four land sales were examined and adjusted to the subject. The adjusted sale indicated a value of $6, 000. 00 per acre. The subject value is calculated as ' follows: $6, 000. 00 x 8.3 acres = $49,800.00, rounded to $50, 000.00. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting subject ' value. It is my opinion, the subject's estimated fair market "as is" as of August 16, 1996 in fee simple is $50, 000. 00. FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. ' Respectfully submitted, // -' ' Rober R. Morra Appraiser -21- • � lii � � . �", • s� ' CERTIFICATE OF LIMITING CONDITIONS The Ap raiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the property ap raised; and neither the employment to make the ' appraisal, nor he compensations for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. All conclusions and opinions concerning the real estate that are ' set forth in the appraisal report, were prepared by the Appraiser whose signature appears on the appraisal report, unless indicated as "Review Appraiser". No change of any item in the appraisal report shall be made by anyone other than the Appraiser, and the appraiser shall have no responsibility for any such unauthorized change. ' The appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the Appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as ' though under responsible ownership. Any. sketch in the report may,show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The ' Appraiser has made no survey of the pro erty; The appraiser is not required fo give testimon or appear in court because of have made the appraisal with reference to the troperty in question, unless arrangements have been previously made herefore. ' Any distribution of the valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of utilization. The se crate valuations for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. ' The Appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or inapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The Appraiser assumes no ' responsibility for such condition, or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. Information estimates, and opinions furnished to the Appraiser and contained in the re ort were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to Le true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. ' Disclosure of the contents of the a ppraisal report is governed by th the Bylaws and Regulations of e rofessional appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report or copy thereof, (including conclusions as to the propertyvalue the identity of the Appraiser, professional designation, reerence to any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the Appraiser if connected) shall be used for any purposes by anyone but ' the client specified in the retort, the borrower if appraisal fee paid by same, the mortgagee or ifs successors and assigns, mort a e insures, consultants, rofessional ap raisal organization, any s a e or federally ap roved financial institution, an department, agency or instrumentalff of the United States or any state or the District ' of Columbia without the previous written consent of the Appraiser, nor shall it be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising public relation news, sales, or other media, without written consent and approval of the appraiser. ' On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike ' manner. -25- t ' CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, ' - the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. ' - the reported analyses, opinion, and conclusions are limited only be the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and ' conclusions. - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that ' is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involves. ' - my compensation is not contingent on an action or event re- sulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in or the use of, this report. - my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the re- quirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards ' of Professional Practice of the American Society of Appraisers, and with the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) ' - the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the American Society of Appraisers relating to review by its duly authorized representative. ' - Robert R. Morra made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report on various dates including - no one provided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this report. ' -the appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the pppro of loan ' Robert Morra Appraiser ' Lic #RGT 1095 -26- ROBERT R. MORRA ' 624 TALCOTTVILLE ROAD VERNON, CONNECTICUT 06066 ' AGE: 52 EDUCATION ' Eastern Connecticut University, Willimantic, Connecticut Bachelor of Arts; Major Education, Mathematics, and Science 1969 Master's Degree; Earth Sciences �J r 1973 Real Estate Courses and Appraisal Courses Principles and Practices, Manchester Community College 1976 Appraisal I, Manchester Community College 1978 ' Real Estate Finance, Manchester Community College 1979 Appraisal II, University of Connecticut 1993 USPAP & Code of Ethics, American Society of Appraisers 1992 Various continuing education courses and seminars 1986-PRESENT ' EXPERIENCE ' Sixteen years of sales and brokerage of commercial and industrial Real Estate 1978-Present Partner Morra-Lavitt Realty 1981-Present ' Fifteen years of appraisals of Real Estate 1979-Present Qualified and testified as an expert in Real Estate matters, all State of Connecticut Courts, and Federal Bankruptcy courts Licenced in Connecticut for appraisals of Residential, Industrial, ' and Commercial Real Estate licence #RGT 1095 Associate, Raiche Associates, Real Estate Appraisers, Wethersfield, Connecticut 1979-1987 ' Owner and Principal, Morra Associates, Real Estate Appraisers Vernon, Connecticut 1988-Present PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member Greater Vernon Board of Realtors; 1979-Present Member of Commercial and Industrial Division of the CAR ' Region Vice-President Northeast Chapter, 1983-1984, President 1985-1986 Candidate Member American Society of Appraisers 1993-Present ' MAJOR CLIENTS REPRESENTED Stafford Savings Bank Stafford, Connecticut ' Savings Bank of Rockville Vernon, Connecticut Bank of South Windsor South Windsor, Connecticut Manchester State Bank Manchester, Connecticut ' Bay Bank of Boston East Long Meadow, Massachusetts Prudential Relocation Shelton, Connecticut Various Mortgage Companies Connecticut ' Towns of Bolton, East Hartford, Somers, and Stafford, Connecticut. Numerous Connecticut and out of state Attorneys Salvation Army Connecticut Various area Corporations and individual property owners ' -27- t RSK-KELLED ANC. • Developers 1744 Ellington Road • Builders• Property- South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 203-644-8761 / 644=8140 Fax: 203-644-5650 September 10, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision --Model Homes We hereby request the following: 1. that we be allowed to construct three (3) model homes in the above subdivision 2. that we be allowed .to offer the existing house located at 1363 Sullivan Avenue for sale; and 3 . that we be granted a sidewalk waiver for a minimum of one side of the street. Thank you in advance for your consideration of these requests. Yours truly, Bruce S. Kelley,V.P. We Build Our -Reputation �,�o aff V FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION PH 9/10/96 ,Y" R nti su' e e id SullivanAvenu-e-squth-oflSand-Hill-Road,-A--20 zone. A zone change from RR to A-20 was granted by this Commission on July 16, 1996. Conditional approval allows the sub 'yider to con tract all o Jalicaot �ic ` "provemehts kor up to ' 6e years ithout post' g Al, subdi 's , bu �it c'o�es not ��low any lot r home sal S. and it do s not'allo th t \ Obtain an{y building p ts, iclt�ding mpdel "omes. o der b ildingjpe ts,the subdvider has tq retu�' at sm point fo al su appro , at whic tine e a sub`dlv'sion bond for the o tanding site w must ��e pos ed. 2. a i-Y`tha�=20 zone-is 20,000 square feet;-proposed lots range mom just over 2fl;000-sq#too-33;000-square-feet (1/2 to 3/4 acre t appears that zoning requirements are met for this subdivision. There is one existing house on Sullivan Avenue, an one new lot with its frontage on Sullivan Avenue. Both houses will be accessed from the new street rather than from Sullivan Avenue. a � r- � s�b has 6 ee'(" t d JThe open space requirement for this subdivision is either e la id area or a fee in lieu of open space. The applicant is requesting a fee in lieu of open space to meet the requirement. 's-avail - - - � nrSullive ,sewer would be provided via a cross-country connection to Pierce Road. WPCA approval is required. Fred Shaw, Sup't of Pollution Control has indicated that the sewer easement will require construction of the gravel access road using a geofabric meeting Town requirements. There should be no structures within the easement. The cross country line should include water-tight manholes and clay stops will be needed on the main line. The applicant should be aware that extreme care will be needed during the installation of the cross-country sewer line due to the very unstable soil conditions present near Pierce Road. These are those same soil conditions that are present in the section of Buckland Road near Town Hall where pipes have just disappeared overnight during installations, and where excavations are very unstable. There are no regulated wetlands on the site, but there is a stormwater discharge proposed that is within a regulated area on adjacent property. This application is pending with IWA/CC for their September 18 meeting. There is no 100 year floodplain shown in the area of the proposed lots. ,"/(o �o .UDC llr� `� d-e� ✓cG ��� (r�,� �� � ©dl '��,� l - Ei been shown-on ogre side-af�the-interior-stree 'the -a hc�t ts- requestinga—wai-ver-to-eliminate-side lFs=completely.the sidewalks remain, staff would like to have them on the north side for better snow melt. I?. The police department's traffic unit has reviewed these plans and has expressed the standard concern regarding new curb cuts and left turns onto and off of Sullivan Avenue during peak traffic hours. �J. The Connecticut Water Company, which owns a future well site abutting this property, has submitted correspondence requesting that a 25' conservation easement area be established at the rear of lots 10-12 to provide additional protection to the future well site. CWC is also requesting that underground fuel storage tanks be prohibited from this subdivision. They have requested that both of these items be noted on the subdivision plans and in the individual lot deeds. /16. The applicant has submitted a street tree plan showing maple trees in a 20' street tree easement. Karl Reichle, Tree Warden, has recommended that the applicant plant Norwegian Sunset Shantung Hybrid maple, which is a very hardy hybrid that tolerates a wide range of conditions and pollutants. (Pf this application is approved, in addition to above-noted modifications, the planning department requests a tree planting specification, including a standard plant type chart. wit r; RSK-llllllllllllKELLC[11NC. • Developers 1744 Ellington Road • Builders South Windsor, CT 06074 • Property managers Tel: 203-644-8761 / 644-8140 Fax: 203-644-5650 September 10, 1996 DI V. 0 1996 Ms. Marcia Banach SEP 1 Director of Planning South Windsor Town of South Windsor t✓ommisston 1540 Sullivan Avenue panning & zoning South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Marcia: Per our conversation, attached is a copy of the appraisal that has been completed by Morra Associates to determine the Fee in Lieu of Open Space for the above project. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sicer`,�/ely, C,Z.fi�C.� 7�- Carol S. Kell 'Ile aq We Build Our Reputation Extended Page We Build Our Reputation 6tN* 8Y-CUNN0VI 9-24-96 0 8 2$ i DISTRICT 1 R. H, -' i# S 1 . The 1995 ADT for this area is 15t900 vehicles, which is high for a two lane roadway. The poat'sd speed limit for the area is 40 mph with the travel, speeds approaching 50 mph. Voll;nae data fcr 1995 provided peak- hour vQlvmes in the area. of 466 vehicles eastbound and 707 vehicles westbound during the AM peak and 792 vehicles eastbound, and 663 vehicles westbound during the PH peak, With high artery volumes and speeds, the Sdditi= of the left turning volume warrants a left turn lane lespecially with the Potential for expaAs.iot with the future road shown on the plan); However, since this ' is a sm411 d19ve1',opmont', the construction of a bypass area should provide a reason-able way to reduce the risk of potential rear and a=idents. A 221 westbound half seotion mint be provided From a point 79,1 east of: the centerline of Fieldstone Drive to 'a paint 50 0" west of the .cen.terli,ne of Fieldstone Drive. Appropriate tapers must be provided.- 2- A stapi�s, 4 and stag bar must be installed on Fieldstone r)rive, 3 . The sight distances, as itdicated on the plans.' are acceptable. <J*44ight i f SOWN Sfq< - * � U� O c 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �OSOR•c0� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 25, 1996 Bruce Kelley CERTIFIED MAIL RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision At the September 18, 1996 regular meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved application#96-58P, IWA/CC permit for a subdivision of 14 lots to be known as "Fieldstone Subdivision" on 9.65 acres located on the westerly side of Sullivan Avenue and southerly of Sand Hill Road, A-20 zone (Assessor's map #76, parcel #20) as shown on plans prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc., Job Number 96-284A1 and dated August 14, 1996. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. One blueprint copy of the entire set of plans and this letter reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission. This must be completed within 65 days of approval prior to any construction activity on the site. 2. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4. The permit is valid for five years and shall expire on September 18, 2001. It has been IWA/CC's policy to notify landowner(s)/applicant(s) of expiring wetland permits. However, it is the landowner(s)/applicant(s) responsibility to track expiration dates and notify the Commission of a renewal request at least 65 days prior to expiration. 5. All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6. A contact person shall be identified on the plans. 7. We recommend a bond in the amount of$5,000 to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with the Erosion and sedimentation Control Measures. 8. The plot plans and deeds shall indicate that a 25' conservation easement has been placed along the rear property boundaries on lots #10, #11, and #12. The deeds shall indicate that prospective buyers have been informed as to the placement of the conservation easement. 9. The plots plans and deeds of all lots shall indicate that no underground tanks be permitted in Fieldstone Subdivision. The deeds shall indicate to prospective buyers that no underground tanks are permitted. Very truly yours, INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION ll ' El' a eth A. Warren, Chairman EAW/pmm cc: Chief Building Official Planning & Zoning Commission Town Engineer - y - J R Russo Associates .w .`OWN Sf4 C U s fi 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 26, 1996 CERTIFIED MAIL Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Appl ##96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on September 24, 1996 to approve wlt modi€ieations the--above-reference%'A appli for-a7-Subdivision-of property+o-e eate-J4 — lots to be known as "Fieldstone Subdivision" on 9.65 acres located at 1363 Sullivan (westerly side of Sullivan Avenue and southerly of Sand Hill Road) A-20 zone as shown on plans prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc., Job Number 96-284A1 and dated August 14, 1996. This approval is subject to the following modifications: 1. This approval is for 14 lots, numbered 1 through 14. 2. Concrete sidewalks built to Town specifications, shall be installed on the north side of the new street. 3. Drainage and construction for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by the public water. 6. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Town Manager. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police. 7. Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. 8. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 9. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of$5,000. 10. Prior to commencement of any site work, a preconstruction meeting must be held with Town Staff. I 11. All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 12. In accordance with Section 5.C.1.c a fee in lieu of open space is required. The fee will be ten percent of the fair market value of the property prior to subdivision approval. This fee is payable on a per-lot'basis, at the time of initial conveyance of each lot. The applicant must provide, with the Commission's agreement, an appraiser to determine the fair market value. 13. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, and street trees that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 14. Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" = 40', shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. 15. If, for any reason, finished grading and other individual lot site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 16. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer (on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter of Credit it is holding. 17. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$700.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 18. No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's office. 19. A 25' conservation easement must be established at the rear of lots 10-12 to provide additional protection to the Connecticut Water Company future well site. Underground fuel storage tanks are also prohibited. 20. Street trees are recommended to be Norwegian Sunset Shantung Hybrid maple and subject to approval of the tree warden. A tree planting specification and standard chart are required. 21. The existing house on Sullivan Avenue may be conveyed prior to filing of subdivision mylars in the Town Clerk's office; however, driveway relocation to the new street is required as shown on the subdivision plan. 22. Engineering comments in memorandum dated September 10, 1996, to the Director of Planning, must be addressed. 23. A 4' road stub is to be constructed in the 50' R.O.W. being deeded to the town for a future road. 24. If additional R.O.W. is needed along Sullivan Avenue, then it shall be quit claimed to the State of Connecticut. 25. Three model homes are permitted and are subject to the following conditions: - All normal building procedures still apply, e.g., provision of emergency access, building permit procedures, etc. The model home is not for sale and cannot receive certificate of occupancy until the site bond is posted and final plans are filed in the Town Clerk's office. All normal certificate of occupancy procedures remain in effect. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets 3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letter of approval of this Commission, Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission as well as WPCA must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk by January 12, 1997. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION fll G. Le ck, Chairman RGL/pmm Enclosures cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Assessor Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal Registrars Business Manager, Board of Education Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. SEP 25 !9 9F LEGAL NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INOUIRER SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 SOUTH WINDSOR - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION At its September 24, 1996 Regular Meeting, the Commission voted to take the following actions: 1. Approve with conditions appl #96-56P, John & Barbara Callahan - Two (2) year Temporary & Conditional permit for an outdoor storage unit on property located at 1212 Sullivan Avenue, RR zone 2. Approve with modifications appl #96-53P, Recyclers, Inc./Santo Lombardo - Site Plan of Development for the expansion of a parking lot on property located on Lot #3, 600 Nutmeg Road, I zone 3. Approve with modifications appl #96-58P, RSK-Kellco, Inc. - Final Subdivision approval for the creation of 14 lots to be known as "Fieldstone Subdivision" on 9.65 acres located at 1363 Sullivan Avenue, A-20 zone 4. Approve with conditions appl #96-63P, Chase Associates - Six months Temporary & Conditional permit for a model home/sales office on property located at 2033 Ellington Road, RR zone Russell G. Levack, Chairman 10'" Sf4 j O y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 tiaSOR CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 October 1, 1996 Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, Ct 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Preconstruction Meeting - Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subd IN ATTENDANCE Michele R. Lipe Town of South Windsor 644-2511 ext 252 Jerry Iazzetta Town of South Windsor 644-2511 ext 245 Karl Reichle Town of South Windsor 644-3531 Jim Slater J & H Slater Company 528-5252 75 Commerce Way South Windsor Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 644-8761 Tracy LaPiene Town of South Windsor 644-2511 ext 257 Jeff Busa SNET 725-4516 Fred Shaw Town of South Windsor 644-2511 ext 247 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting. Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth moving operations in each area and maintained/cleaned out during construction. Call the Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer for inspection when measures are in place, prior to commencement of site work. 2. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected (ringed with haybales or equal). 3. During construction of the road a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel onto Sullivan Avenue. Calcium chloride or water is to be used for dust control as required. Public Works 1. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans to be provided to Town prior to start of construction. They will be stamped by the Planning Department along with plans developer needs. Only approved plans are to be used on the job site. 2. The Public Works Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist required for the following: a. After site is staked out b. All drainage work C. Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as per Developer's checklist d. Preparation of subbase, six (6) inch lifts e. Placement of bituminous concrete, 2 inch layers maximum 3. Certification of gravel used as subbase will be required from an approved testing company. 4. Certification of all products used -- storm pipe, structures, pavement, etc., shall be presented to the Town Engineer prior to installation. 5. Two (2) weeks notice must be given prior to placing the finish pavement course. This is to allow for inspection and correction measures (if necessary) of the infrastructure, prior to final pavement. 6. Applicant/developer should be aware that the inspection of the infrastructure improvements may result in the replacement of structure tops and/or structures prior to final paving if found to be deficient. 7. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 8. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all underdrains, footing drains, and sanitary sewers located as per revised as-built checklist. 9. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment or approved equal if deep trench is encountered. Any pipe or structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 10. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Bruce Kelley, 644-8761 in the field. 11. All filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 12. Job meetings will be held as needed, and can be called by the developer or Town. 13. Forty-eight (48) hours notice needed for certificate of occupancy inspection. Two week review period (10 working days) needed for all individual site (lot) plans prior to issuance of building permit (may be longer if application is incomplete). See general guidelines for certificate of occupancy and building permit procedures. 14. Any proposed changes are to be presented to the Engineering or Planning Department prior to implementation on change order form in quadruplicate with 4 copies of the drawing. Town will attempt to turn around within 24 hours. 15. DOT permit needed for all work within state road. Copy must be given to the Engineering Department. 16. No paving after October 15 or before April 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 17. Normal hours of operation 7:00 a.in. - 5:00 p.m., no work on Sunday. 18. Drain Layers and Street Excavation Permits will be required. 19. Detail of connection to existing sanitary main in Pierce Road must be submitted to Town Engineer for approval prior to constructing. Planning_Department 1 1. Landscaping is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. If there are changes required, contact the Planning Dept. Additional landscaping installed on one part of a site will not preclude planting all of the remaining items shown on the landscaping plan. 2. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of$1,000,000. 3. In accordance with Section 5.C.I.c a fee in lieu of open space is required. The fee will be ten percent of the fair market value of the property prior to subdivision approval. This fee is payable on a per-lot basis, at the time of initial conveyance of each lot. The applicant must provide, with the Commission's agreement, an appraiser to determine the fair market value. 4. All easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, and street trees that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted on standard Town easement form where appropriate, to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds for open space, public improvements and roadways must be submitted prior to request for Town acceptance; all deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. 5. .Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer (on the enclosed form) for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter of Credit it is holding. 6. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of$700.00 shall be submitted to this Commission. 7. A 25' conservation easement must be established at the rear of lots 10-12 to provide additional protection to the Connecticut Water Company future well site. Underground fuel storage tanks are also prohibited. 8. The existing house on Sullivan Avenue may be conveyed prior to filing of subdivision mylars in the Town Clerk's office; however, driveway relocation to the new street is required as shown on the subdivision plan. 9. A 4' road stub is to be constructed in the 50' R.O.W. being deeded to the town for a future road. 10. Three model homes are permitted and are subject to the following conditions: - All normal building procedures still apply, e.g., provision of emergency access, building permit procedures, etc. - The model home is not for sale and cannot receive certificate of occupancy until the site bond is posted and final plans are filed in the Town Clerk's office. All normal certificate of occupancy procedures remain in effect. W.P.C.A. 1. WPCA approval with the approval letter shall be put on the final plans. .2. Detail for cross country line - geofabric and process stone. SNET/NU 1. Contact utilities for coordination of utilities connection. IWA/CC 1. A $5,000 bond for E & S measures is to be submitted. 2. Contact the Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer when wetlands plantings are proposed to be installed. Fire Marshal 1. Blasting (if required) to be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. Police Services 1. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to Police Services on a company letterhead. If the developer occupies or owns the building(s) after construction emergency numbers must be provided to Police Services. 2. All buildings located on property which abuts a public highway must be numbered. Such number(s) (address) shall be visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 thru 6-802. Barns, garages, and outbuildings which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure are excluded. 3. Erect temporary sign on the site during construction identifying the project. 4. If an alarm is to be installed contact Police Services. Building_De_partment 1. Plan review with Building Official/Fire Marshal required prior to application for building permit. Coordinate with Chief Building Official. Ve truly yours, Michele R. Lipe, AICP Assistant Planner/Analyst MRL/pmm cc: Michael Ritter, SWPS Mel Stead, Public Works Bob Berubt, CL&P Minh V. Le, SNET John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Jeffrey Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer MORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: &8 a� 1996 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION S q 30 We have reviewed the revised drawingsAdated 9—C-96 for the proposed Fieldstone Subdivision and have the following comments : Sheet 4 & 5 1 . U%derdra ' s should be placed on both sidesofr �� osdo +4 tocua-sacoun a de-sac. Soils( OB & ave groan er tables. 2 . Proposed sanitary easement to Pierce Road shows a driveway within it . The easement documents should indicate that the Town will not be responsible for any repairs to the driveway if repair of pipe or manhole is necessary, however, it is preferred that no driveway be within the easement. 3 . There is a concern about the proposed connection to sanitary sewer in Pierce Road. When the main was installed the soil encountered was very yielding causing many problems, including losing a manhole and pipe. The developer should have special measures in place to deal with this problem. 4 . Roof leaders not addressed. it nho sh a a n. future mai t s . 1" sedimentation s cture �shou�le se at K ctu cau of a 7 . A gravel access road should be shown for the storm a" "cross country" pipes. Note should indicate locking manhole covers are to be used. ffs a the str ine quire r pro sed drivew on 1 2 d C basi 'nform on not c lete ra' ata 1,Q u -d s i ate 1; . La 'ng o " anitary and orm Sew ase " er sto ipe i no Ilea . l itary, nhole shoul a oved of 'F re oa rcia A. Banach ,e: Fieldstone September 10, 1996 Sheet 6 1. Inverts are required for sanitary laterals and footing drains both at the houses and at the main. 2 . A test hole should be dug in Pierce Road where proposed 1'C sanitary manhole is to be placed.. It appears that a possible conflict with the storm pipe may exist. 3 . All foundation drain ipe under the proposed road must be PVC . n?,5 W AvoreD �IV r*$ sir A 4 . It should be noted that locking, watertight manhole covers are to b used in "cross country"vmainx- S'. 57rZOe7OXL-�// M 7� D0�u 67 5/DE O� j3/[�F/LT��• It ' s felt t t the required intersection sig ances shou be b ed upo ConnDOT desirable intersect ' sight clistances ich would 75 feet (using 49 . 9 MPH as gn speed fo Sulliv n Avenue) . en desirable sight dis c s are measured they re measured point 20 feet bac rom he edge of pave en . The maxi um sigh distance rovided, ooking north, is 0 feet at 12 feet back from a ed of paveme t . There is no ication on dra ing as to what a sight dis ance would be at 0 et back from he pavement. a plicant ould provide thi inf ation so t at we can ev u th' prope ly. Th sight ance provi ed, 1 ing south, is t e note o she indicates t t " (20 ' tback ca e i ined to king ou I would assu a that ea that 0 foot sight ' sta a is also at 20 a k f pavement. If this is n t true, please have applicant clarify. JC I/j sv %WvJJCD&MABMFMOS/Jkld UW9-10 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning +, FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: October 3 , 1996 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the revised drawings sheets 3 , 4 , 5 & 6 dated 9-30-96 for the proposed Fieldstone Subdivision and have the following comments : Sheet 4 & 5 1 . Proposed sanitary easement to Pierce Road shows a driveway within it . The easement documents should indicate that the Town will not be responsible for any repairs to the driveway if repair of pipe or manhole is necessary, however, it is preferred that no driveway be within the easement . 2 . There is a concern about the proposed connection to sanitary sewer in Pierce Road. When the main was installed the soil encountered was very yielding causing many problems, including losing a manhole and pipe. The developer should have special measures in place to deal with this problem. 3 . Roof leader disposition should be indicated on drawing sheet 6 . 4 . A gravel access road should be shown for the storm "cross country" pipes . Note should indicate locking manhole covers are to be used. Sheet 6 1 . A test hole should be dug in Pierce Road where proposed sanitary manhole is to be placed. It appears that a possible conflict with the storm pipe may exist . 2 . It should be noted that locking, watertight manhole covers are to be used in "cross country" storm mains . 3 . Gravel access road required for storm pipe from structure 411 to outlet, and along side of biofilter. Post-it°Fax Note 7671 D JCl/j sv ate /a/7 #ot � Toff/ pa9es� From �r Co./Dept. Co. C11 Phone# Phone# Fax# ® Fax# G y/I SOW N Sf4 C s U T-OW4-1,11t, Cie S-0ad, VfAILA lot .1 tiC71540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 October 9, 1996 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Dear Mr. Kelley: The South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority, at its regular meeting of October 1, 1996, gave approval for the connection to the Town' s sewerage system of a 14-lot residential subdivision at Sullivan Avenue, as more specifically shown on plans entitled "Proposed Fieldstone Subdivision, Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT, " as prepared by Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. , 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, CT 06040, dated 8/14/96, no revisions, and subject the following conditions : 1 . Approval of the Town Engineer. 2 . Final Authority approval and acceptance of the sanitary sewerage connection will be given once the sewer line has been installed and inspected by the Town staff, and based upon the written verification of the Town staff that said sanitary sewer line was installed in substantial conformance with the design plans previously approved by the Authority, and meeting all Town regulations and appropriate technical specifications relating to sanitary sewer construction. 3 . A gravel access road, including a geofabric and meeting Town requirements, must be provided over entire area of cross-country easement. The gravel road shall be constructed of free draining process stone between 1/2 inch and 1-1/2 inches in size laid over fabric to a depth of at least 8 inches . The fabric shall be AMOCO Fabric 2002, or approved equal . 4 . No structures shall be built over the easement and no ornamental plants shall be planted in the easement . r Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. October 9, 1996 5 . Cross-country line should include watertight manhole. Provide detail of manhole connection on Pierce Road. Outside drop manhole is required. Cross-country line must be of adequate size and slope to handle all of the upstream undeveloped property that is capable of being served by the line. 6 . Plans should include invert elevations for sewer laterals. 7 . Provide clay stops on main line every 100 feet . 8 . Easement must be enforceable, as approved by the Town Attorney. 9 . The Town shall bear no liability for repair or replacement of blacktop if a paved driveway is installed by the property owner within the cross-country sewer easement . 10 . This approval letter must be superimposed on the final approval plans. Very truly yours, J eph J. Carino, Chairman Water Pollution Control Authority JJC:bmr cc : Matthew B. Galligan, Town Manager Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer V Marcia Banach, Director of Planning John Collins, Chief Building Inspector Jeff Folger, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer /rwsoMPC4/fieldstone SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that WILLIAM C. O' BRIEN and LINDA L. O' BRIEN of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, received to their full satisfaction of RSK-KELLCO, INC. , a Connecticut corporation having its principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said RSK-KELLCO, INC. , its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use, alter, replace, and repair sewer pipes, with such appurtenances as are from time to time needed, together with the right to enter in connection therewith, under and across Grantor ' s land as more particularly described in Exhibit A. Within said parcel described in Exhibit A, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees and bushes as may be convenient or necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with men and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction of said sanitary sewer lines, sanitary sewer pipes , or sanitary sewer drainage systems and to excavate and fill, and, if necessary, to alter existing water courses or form embankments over said sanitary sewer lines, sanitary sewer pipes , or sanitary sewer drainage systems . The Grantors herein, for themselves, their heirs and assigns, shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures on said easements or rights-of-way and shall not plant or allow to be planted or grown any bushes, ornamental plants, shrubbery or trees of any kind thereon or perform any work thereon within said easements or rights-of-way which may endanger or interfere with said line, pipe or sanitary sewer systems. The Grantors herein for themselves, their successors and assigns , reserve the right to themselves , their heirs and assigns , to continue to use the land within which the aforesaid easements or rights-of-way have been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilliing the purpose for which these easements or rights-of-way are granted. The Grantee herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to restore and maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use upon the completion of any maintenance, operation, construction, replacement or repair work in said easement or right-of-way areas. .Lue Grantee agrees to hold the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the construction and/or maintenance and repair of said sanitary sewer line. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of , 1996 . Signed Sealed and Delivered GRANTORS: in the Presence of: William C. O' Brien Linda L. O' Brien STATE OF CONNECTICUT) ss : COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this day of , 1996 , before me the undersigned officer, personally appeared William C. O' Brien and Linda L. O' Brien, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same for the purposes therein contained. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand. Notary Public/Commissioner of the Superior Court EXHIBIT A Said Sanitary Sewer Easement is located on a certain piece or parcel of land on the easterly side of Pierce Road owned N/F by William C. O' Brien and Linda L. O' Brien in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut as more particularly described as Sanitary Sewer Easement To the Town of South Windsor Area = 9 ,702 Sq. Ft. on a map or plan entitled "RSK-KELLCO, INC PLOT PLAN FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT Fuss & O' Neill Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut 06040 (203) 646-2469 Job Number 96-284A1 Phase 7000 Date 8i14i96 Revision Date: 1. 9-6-96 2. 9-30-96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Scale: 1" = 40 '" , which map is on file or to be filed on the South Windsor Land Records . Said Sanitary Sewer Easement is more particularly bounded and described as follows : NORTHEASTERLY: By land NIF William C. O' Brien and Linda L. O' Brien, a distance of 369.01 ' ; SOUTHEASTERLY: By Lot #9, as shown on said map or plan, a distance of 20 ' ; SOUTHWESTERLY: By land NIF William J. Mangino and Jeanne C. Mangino, Co-Trustees , a distance of 369.02 ' ; and NORTHWESTERLY: By Pierce Road, as shown on said map or plan, a distance of 20.121 ; Said easement area contains 90702 square feet. SOW N Sf9 ° xf -ownS'0'�ale C, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 RSK-KELLCO, Inc . November 26, 1996 Mr. Bruce S . Kelley 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: RE: Paving after October 15, 1996 Please be advised that this Department is in receipt of your request to pave after October 15th at Heritage Drive. Paving will be permitted only if the following conditions are met . 1 . Weather conditions must be favorable weather. Tem erature must be 40° F or warmerving at sin dofrse pa v—inc 2 . Base surface of road/driveway must be 40 F or warmer. NO paving if there is frozen ground, snow/wet base conditions . 3 . Owner must notify Town Engineering Division 24 hours in advance of anticipated paving date. 4 • NO paving is to begin until Town has inspected site the day of paving. 5 . Paving operation to follow DOT Form 814A specifications . Should you fail to follow the conditions noted above, we may not accept/approve the improvements to your project . Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, Michael J. "Gantick,-PE. MJG/jsv Director of Public Works cc : Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer/ Melvin C. Stead, Jr. , Supt . of Street Services Scott C. Lappen, Street Service Specialist Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Project File RSK KELLCUINC. • Developers ton Road 1744 Ellin • Builders g • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 November 21, 1996 Michael Gantick, Director Public Works Department Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Paving after October 15, 1996 Dear Mr. Gantick: We hereby request permission to pave Heritage Drive on or about the first week in December 1996. We would appreciate receiving your response as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely Bruce S. Kelley N�V 2 5 1996 We Build Our Reputation i 10 N Sf4 ` •7/,/��/y 1s O c V ,� •_, mac, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 December 12, 1996 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-KELLCO, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: This is to confirm u ,, conversation on Tuesday, December 10, 1996 concerning the dstone Subdivision. When I arrived on the site, subbase material was being placed. I asked about compaction on the subgrade and was told that compaction tests were not performed prior to placing subbase material . I indicated at our meeting that the subgrade must be inspected for compaction before any further subbase or base material is placed. This should be done by removing the subbase gravel by hand digging and performing the compaction tests on those areas selected by the Town. I also indicated that sieve analysis for the bank run gravel used for the subbase must be provided to the Engineering Department, compaction tests performed and test results reviewed and approved before the base material can be placed. If you have any questions, please call me at 644-2511, extension 240 . Very truly yours, Robert Donahue Project Engineer RD:bmr cc : Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer Tracy LaPiene, Project Engineer Melvin Stead, Jr. , Supt . of Streets 1nmso/ENGINEERING/fieldstone ,OWN Sf4 J Town 0 Ile SotdA a 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR,CpC AREA CODE 203/644-2511 r`I'O December 13 , 1996 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: It is my understanding that the work on the roadway (Heritage Drive) for the Fieldstone Subdivision has not been accomplished in accordance with the Town' s requirements . At the October 1, 1996 preconstruction meeting, the procedures for inspection of the roadway were outlined and a copy of the Developer' s Checklist which details the Town' s testing requirements was distributed to you. On December 10, 1996, Mr. Robert Donahue, Project Engineer, was at your site and noticed that subbase material was being placed. He contacted me to see if compaction tests were received for the finished subgrade. He was concerned because of the wetness of the site and the movement of the subgrade when trucks were driving over it . Mr. Donahue was informed that no compaction results were received. He then returned to the site and indicated to you that the subgrade must be tested before any more subbase material was placed. It is also my understanding that you informed Mr. Donahue that you planned to place base material the next day. Mr. Donahue then stated that a sieve analysis and compaction tests on the subbase were needed before any placement of base material (in addition to compaction tests of subgrade) . However, base material was placed on the roadway even though none of the required testing was done. Therefore, we cannot allow you to place pavement until such time as it is proven that each of the courses placed meet Town Standards. It is incumbent upon you to provide a plan for testing of the subgrade, subbase and base courses to the Town for approval prior to any testing. Bru ce uce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. December 13 , 1996 Page 2 . If you have any questions, please call me at 644-2511, extension 245 . Very truly yours, #w3ine&r-,/ a I z tAa, P.E. JCI :bmr CC : Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Melvin C. Stead, Jr. , Supt . of Streets Robert Donahue, Project Engineer Tracy LaPiene, Project Engineer Barry Guliano, Town Attorney /russo/ENGINEERINGIfields one e s � *'h�JO1 CO��r I1fVironmental _....... ..- . L � _... . Getatechrtic.a! f Coinstruction Consulting • Engineering • 7e$ting I l/ REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: BRUCE KELLY PROJECT:R.S.X. KELLCO FIELDSTONE, 1363 SULLIVAN AVE.1744 ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CI' SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 DATE; April 21, 1997 OUR REPORT NO.' 095-60193-3 _ _. PAGE 1 OF 3 TEST DATA: 3?ARK BROWN SAND WITH SMALL STON28 (2) OPT, MOIST. SUPPLIED PROCTOR FOR PROCESSED (1) 144.3 DENSITY AT 5,9& MOI$'I'L1RE TEST MAXIMUM COMMENTS' NOT _ DEPTH -- ELEVATION INUMBERO — ENSITY W CONTENT pE s1TY D NSITY COWATER WET DRYERCE ON Spec. 9515 Min 1 811 _ _911 2 1320 7.2 -• . 137.5 120.3 97.2 4 A 8° -3" 1 144.3 3 ,$ 15- _� _._. _ ........ . 9 147.3 102.1 3 - A ........ ... 3-- all ---911—- --- 2 122.0 6.9 135.8 127 0 96.2 4 - A _. . gII -3" 1 144.3 3.4 14e.2 143 .3 99.3 3 - A 5 81I "��� 2 132 .0 3.4 '131.3 I 127.0 96.2 4 - A 6 81I 311 1 3,44.3 2,5 143.5 I 140.b 97.0 3 - j!, -- TEST LOCATION: ROADWAY AT FIELDSTONE 1 STATION 1+30, TEST HOLE #1 2 STATION 1+30 � 3 STATION 0+40, TEST HOLE #2 4 STATION 0+40 STATION 0+10, TEST HOLE 43 SA c 6 STATION 0+10 S, S�oE C�! �e - SAC NOTES: TESTS PERFORMED PER ASTM 132922•01 &ASTM D3017-88(93) `COMMENTS: 1.FILL MATERIAL A, TEST RESULTS CQMPLY WITH SPECIFI DENS1TIi S SHgWN:Lbs.per cubic foot 2,BACKpILL 6, PERCENT COyTI0N5 WATER C�NTENT:Percce�nt of dry Welght 3,gq E COURSE CA NY DOES NQT Cq LY PERCENT COMPACTIgN:6aseQ On rtSammum dry 4.SUBBASE NTH SPE I JICATtONS CIS obtalnep on sample indicated by a, OIL CEMENT C. RETk7. 1 t VIOUS TEST soillD number. g D. INOI R I CESS OF SPECIFICATIONS * ASTM D-15 S 7, PROCEDURE C 6.OTHER E NIO E OW SPECIFICATIONS TEST INSTRUMENT: CAMPBELL, MC-3, 6392 ITAN f DC6UNT rw p: REMARKS: PSI DIP NOT MONITOR THE FILL PLACEMENT, ADJU NTDA'fA p; ELEVATION FROM FINISHED ORPdDE FM TECHNICIAN: ' Respectfully submitted, `Professionafi$eNice Industries,Inc. cc: 2 REPORTS THESE TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS NOTED AND MAY NOT REPRESENT ANY OTHER LOCATIONS OR 4EVATION0. REPORTS MAY NOT BE AEPRQDVCEO,EXCEPT IN FULL.WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION 13Y PROFE,`-IONAL SERVICE INDUBT RIE6,INC. " "s 1q.1bi-matioll-76 Build On, -51Aa00.2(3)F P$I•55 State Straat•NOr(h Haven,CT 06473•Ph 23 _ . one 2031.. 9 3353•Fax 203/230-3453 -------------------------------------------------------- • ' APR 22 '97 13:05 FR PSI - HORTH HAVEN 2b3 239 3453 TO 18606445650 P.03/04 ffEnvironmental 1COnStruction Ceote'chnical Al Consulting • Engineering • Testimig REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: SRUCE KRLYY KELL R.S.K. ELLCO PROJECT: FIELDSTONE, 1363 SULLIVAN AVE.1744 ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH 'WINDSOR, CT SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 DATE: April 21, 19911 -- OUR REPORT NO.: 095-60193-3 PAGE 2 OF 3 TESTDATA: DARK BROWN SAND WITH SMALL STONES (2) OPT. MOIST. = 7.5$ . .-- CLIENT SUPPLIED PROCTOR FOR PROCESSED : (1) 144.3 DENSITY AT 5,g$ MOISTURE TEST TEST MAXIMUM COMMENTS` NO. DEPTH SOIL ID LAS DRY * WATER WET DRY FERG6NT —__..._ ELEVATION NUMBER DENSITY CONTENT DENSITY - DENSITY COMPACTION Spec 95V Min ---.... 7 _ gII -9" _._._.2 132_0 . 6.2 135.5 127.E 96.7 4 - A -- __. _ 9 8" -3" 1 144.3 3.2 144. 5 140.0 97,0 3 - A II "�'� 2 132.0 7, p 135.6 126,7 96.0 4 - A 1 R n ..- -___ _ 1 144, 3 2.9 151.4 147.1 101, 9 3 - A --_,...._... _....— 11 all -9" 2 132,0 6.7 142.1 133 .2 100.9 4 A 12 8" -3" 1 144 3 3 .0 153,4 148.9 103.2 3 ]a TEST LOCATION: ROADWAY AT FIELDSTONE 7 STATION 3+20I TEST HOLE #4 STATION 3+20 STATION 4+80, 'PEST HOL8 #5 10 STATION 4+80 11 STATION 6+90, Tr' ST HOLE #6 12 STATION 6+90 NOTES: TESTS PERFORMEt7 PER ASTM D2922-91 &ASTM D30.17.8a 9� *C DENSITIES SH WN•Lbs,Per cubic loot t *COMMENTS: 1.FILL MATERIAL A. TEST RESULT$COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS WATER CONT NT:percent of d weight. 2.BACKFILL B. PERCENT COMPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY PERCENT COMPACTION:Sased on maximum dry 3.BASE COURSE WITH SPECIFICATIONS ae ty obtained on sample indicated by 4 SUBBASE C. RETEST F1�PIREVIOSUS TEST soil Ib nurnber. s:�THk �MCNT E. M�ISTURE BE UW p OF FICA SPECIFICATIONS * ASTM D-1557, PROCEDURE C TEST INSTRUMENT: REMARKS: PSI DID NOT MONITOR THE FILL PLACEMENT. ADJUSTMENT DATA M: p: ELEVATION FROM FINISHED GaADE TECHNICIAN; FM Respectfully submitted, Professional Service Industries,Inc. cc: 2 REPORTS TNE$E TE:Y RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE 8PEOIFIC LOCATIONS NOTED AND MAY NOT REPRESENT ANY OTHER LOCATIONS OR ELEVATIONS. REPORT$MAY NOY BE REPRODUCED,EXCEPT 1N FULL,WITHOUT V MITTEN PERMISSION BY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INOU.STRIES,INC.. �nvim, n ienta/ Ceotechniclal MAP%WE.111". Construction Consulting • Engineering• Testing REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS TESTED FOR: BRUCE KELLY PROJECT: FIELDSTONE, 1363 SULLIVAN AVE. R.S.K. KELLCO SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 1744 ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 DATE: April 21, 1997 OUR REPORT NO.: 095-60193-3 PAGE 3-OF 3 TEST DATA: DARK BROWN SAND WITH SMA L STONES .(2) OPT. MOIST. 7.5%' CLIENT SUPPLIr_V PROCTOR FOR PROCESSED (1) 144.3 DENSITY AT 5.9$ MOISTUR) MAXIMUM COMMENTS' TEST TEST SOIL 10 I LAS DRY K WATER WET pEC. 95$ M DRY PERCENT S NO. DEPTH ELEVATION NUMBBR 0f.NSITY CONTENT DENSITY DENSITY COMPACTION 7.3 811 -91: 3 132.0 5. 9 140.4 132.6 100.5 4 A 14 811 -311 1 144.3 3 .6 146.5 141.4 I 96 .0 3 - A 1r-, 8n ='911 2 132.0 7.4..._ 138.2 j 128.7 97.5 4 - A 16 811 -311 1 144.3 2.5 144 .2 ' 140.7 97.5 3 - A ... ........ I TEST LOCATION: ROADWAY AT FIELDSTONE 13 STATION 3+30, TEST HOLE #7 14 STATION 3+30 15 STATION 0-30, TEST HOLE #$ .� �cv HP/L 1(5 STATION 0-30 NOTES: TESTS PERFORMED PER A$TM D2922-01&ASTM D3017-88(93) •COMMENT$: 1.FILL MATERIAL A. TEST RESULTS COMPLY W T�SPECIFICATIO DENNSSITIES SHOWN:Lbs.per cuolc loot 2.BACKFILL B. PERCENT COMPACTION D�E NOT COMPLY WA CER CONTENT;Percent of dry weight. 3.BASE COURSE W++TH SPECIFICATION PERCENT COMPACTION:Bases!on maximum dry 4.SUBBASE C. RETEST OF PREVIOUS TEST density obt�Ined on sample indicated by 5.SOIL CEMENT D. MOWUR IN EXCESS OF SPE IFICATIONS soil 10 nurnUer, B.OTHER E. MOISTUR-BELOW SPECIFICATIONS * ASTM D-1557, PROCEDURE C TEST INSTRUMENT; STANDARD COUNT M: ❑; REMARKS: PSI DID NOT MONITOR THE FILL PLACEMENT. ADJUSTMENT DATA M: D: ELEVATION FROM FINISRSD GRADE Respectfully submitted, TECHNICIAN: FM Professional Service lnc(ustries,It cc: 2 REPORTS THESE TESY RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS NOTED AND MAY NOT REPRESENT ANY OTHER LOCATIONS OR 81,EVAYIGNS. REPORTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED.EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY PROFF"t)ONAL SEP.VICE INDUSTRIES,INC. P&IA-i00-z 13)F PSI•55 State Street-North Haven,CT 06473•Phone 203/239-3353•Fax 203/239.3453 _ L 01N TILCON .l` vowm , Aim 60 South Main SVaat•Eatn Qramby,Conna&:ut 08028 ode December 6, 1996 R.S.K. Contractors 1774 Ellington Road South Windsor, Connecticut 06075 - RED Eaeld Stone. ulilvan Avenue South Windsor; CT LARGE RFR sTON Sieves % Eass6 DOT 814 2 1/4" 100 100 2" 97 95 - 100 314" 61 50 - 75 114" 32 25 -45 i #40 9 5 - 20 #100 3 2 - 12 i f For Compaction - 144.3 @ 5.9% moisture. TILCON RONCARI INC. I Richard Murphy Quality Control Division RM/bsr HARTFORD (850)527.1925 EAST aRANVY(880)653-2524 WINDSOR LOCKS(880)8?3.3W1 PAX(8W)$534012 An Equal Opportunity Emooyar MJFN i f N�: Environmental M Geotechnical N Construction Consulting Engineering * Testing - REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP OF SOIL TESTED FOR:. BRUCE KELLY PROJECT: FIELDSTONE, 1363 SULLIVAN AVE. R.`S:K. KELLCO SO�TTH WINDSOR, CT 1744 ELLINGTON ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 DATE: December 16, 1996 OUR REPORT NO.: 095-60193-2 - - - - --— -- --- - TEST DATA Visual Classification DARK BROWN SAND WITH SMALL STONES 144 I It'I �I 41'�Il Sample Source OFF SITE Method of Test ASTM D-1557, PROCEDURE C { II !l Rammer: Mechanical Method of Preparation: Moist ll t Test Results H 140 t� Maximum Dry Density 132.0 Ibs/ft. O {} ' } 1 C ( I Optimum Moisture Content 7.5 l�� LL L --9-3 )D4318 - (estimate)Specific Gravity: 2 .65L: PL: - PI• 136 II ,I l I i; ! I, {{L(II , }I�1 �}1 :•I I I I 1, I { I I Grain Size Analysis I I, (ASTMC136-93AND/ORC117-90)a Sieve Percent vi I 11 L r In };:, II, { 1} , I I II {. . 1 I1!I Size Passing .J il'i11 li iliil!,I' !�' I !! I 1132 I ffff ! Z w II,,L,11 I t�lli.l ! I� 128 ;i'.t.11l Ili!I!Ili li�l' lllllll I I' I If I I �" - } lii�lill� �I'I !! !i.i II I ,I 124 120 I!Il�t'rl il� 1 ,t I p 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT Respectfully submitted, REMARKS: LAB Dio. .505 Professional Service Industries,Inc. Lab Tech: RJ cc: 2 REPORTS REPORTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED.EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES,INC. hijb n.atim 7b Build Oil A-100-1(2)F,� PSI•55 State Street•North Haven,CT 06473•Phone 203/239-3353.•Fax 203/239-3453 QeoteMnlcal Construction k- `Cons4i0w• Erl.9dneering • 71ast/ng REPORT drsiEVEAVALYsis TESTING 7E$ttb kbl4: HERB HOLDEN TRUCKING VARIOUS LABpRAn)Ry TEST INO P.O. BOX 308 P.O. NUMBER 4789 EAST WINDSOIq, CT 06016 FOURTH OUARTER , PAM., DECEMSER 7, 1995 OUli RFPbNrNo.: 096-50058-00021 RESULTS ON SAMPLE'IDENTIFI80 A5 FOLLOWS, RECEIVED IN OUR LA9' ON: Dacamber 5, 1995 1 OESCRIMOM' Brown medium sand and stone ' SOURCE: S-1 VEST PERFORMED: Washed Slave Analysis L LAD NO.: 665 :;•k.. �1�+f� +•1 I `O:•I`.': .E:} .f" VT�I�1JI71J►r rJ/A•• 4/fl.. �.t •H S.v u�l.;j; .9t IV..xa:.:dai} ':i::`ti:�::,_:.::%e ;• � : ns'.Y.r n4a it 4•: //� /YyyL,JI (`j Ta••11 y "1 r 8� .,+;}t ri.l 1,• ':rf f '1• •ii'i oi•i•I I `1 .y 2� till I• �'I >:':: :.:�•:::: ••S 1•J f' , i'�v:f}.:;;:..•�••:y:>3>:<a}i Y-r....,r.;......}.....:r V ..r. ..• r•...:.::.:�.•-..-.:::..+. .. ...nv..:.:.. :.:.:. ^v>.t v. .�..<... : 1.. f�1,x.L:{.•.T;•<,•:::-.,;,rwu:' � . .,.. I.I f••kr•• .... ...::.:..::..:......:....::..�'r.•.: ,..::..:., .kri+4rittv:tyv h•Jx•,1:<.�::Ti•:It is'...,J:':til.l.l',�ij'y u.;;:�.:::5:.:...S.•�. ' r �:Yii.Xa r�•x<ih :3Ft. :<•xa:r Y Xk 'Rk. .3 4.. :ixcS ri. i•: vX N:a•:Xv> L ih» r r,. r :. ...•.,r,vr....•.: ..n:;l��t•i•.. ,•••,•,• t :;::..r;I;Sij.:,..' ... ......::..... <} ,:.:..:,'is.n`:w:v i:'•••..r lv�: ':>. ',....:.Y .,..<-:x.i:ta:t•:'v:i: .. xop,..Z:SJ:.`:.:,::::�si�.':.>::"i,��s', , r}Xtr nr2:fl:,.x. .I• J.5::40. i' L'I•• i4:irf•>X4•.:� r o>}Xsrr R f3X' f<;t, •?w+ i Sxn}:,t `ft �,�{• kC, k x>Yr � r! r' :. ...:........nr.::'a::� cv.,a.,<tY:•: •.ia.}.ay..;.Y. •:'i�.••.. • xi'• :rk}: �• i:�:Yr:Li:Xavr �+ itpt::. I �1 T: ;J J.S"%F?"SFr�`ti:::i:.:.::o:i'�:•,.y,., I rx' '•I fF:rn+ L. r- .r... � ...... ♦.�,i:....:•vY.iv:Mvni3..:i.Y:d:t;:}.>:\•Y:<.rt:.;:}:3:<v>i :t: ::i�n::l. a:sTr rt:: F•s:;•ri�ci<r:,,<f a.k6rfC�xo3..,+.x..t:{.,cw...•.x:.}n.:.: t?• 't •�'i.' a:SY.iKCx W •br x;:' 1 Kt•... .5�' T ."f`�Via:.}:.: >d4.• .i:v viaav: REMAI?KS: Tins material meets the requirad gradation specifications for this material in addition to State of CT, Form B 14 M.02,06,grading B. f?eSPbaiuily'submltted, i b aid , PSI 0J act Aeporm - 2 }r Pj 9 A � Ap�kYr►HtifU2 mnrRiririurtkn YNt0XVro wuersrrsrraL rpf: tAefrokSi�trrenttN/ti[11V0►rfJtteYr�v ._ 111 jfif'i17[l li3ll �:(i '"_'.4.:'.•., I *jMMFj%rr&ArMXM mitlan Stre jl a Phon9 203/T72.0710•P3X 203/772.0713 1 945 PAGE 293 �10'N N s c" 002623 "ty c s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soe•co� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 May 15, 1997 Carol S. Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 ` Dear Mrs. Kelley: Re: Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision Please be advised that, in accordance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statutes and the South Windsor Subdivision Regulations, the fee in lieu of open space for the above-referenced subdivision is $5,650 which was established by the Planning & Zoning Commission at the May 13, 1997 meeting. This amount is 10% of the appraised value of the subdivision land prior to subdivision approval. This fee is payable on a per-lot basis, at the time of the initial conveyance of each lot. One-thirteenth of the total amount is due with each lot conveyance ($434.62). At or before conveyance of each lot, a check payable to the Town of South Windsor must be delivered to the Planning Department. It will then be deposited into an open space fund in accordance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statutes 8-25 and 8-25B as amended. A copy of this letter will be filed on the land records so that potential buyers will be aware of the obligation on each lot. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REssell G. Lev6ck, Chairman RGL/pmm cc: Land Records Chief Building Official RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT J e RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSOR LAND RECORDS VOL PAGE BY OWN CLERK TOWN C= RSK-KELLCUINC. • Developers 1744 Ellington Road • Builders g • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 D May 7, 1997 it,. MAY 7 1991 Ms. Marcia Banach South Windsor Director of Planning Planning & Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision--Open Space Appraisal Dear Marcia: I am enclosing an amended appraisal report for the Fieldstone Subdivision to be used in establishing the fee in lieu of open space as required. The appraisal report submitted to you on September 10, 1996, was prepared based on raw land in a rural residential zone. This amended report reflects the zone change to an "A-20" zone. If you require anything further from this office, please call. Yours truly, Carol S. Kelle fstosapp We Build Our Reputation Real Estate Appraisers 624 Talcottville Road Vernon, CT 06066 Robert Morra Telephone (203) 875-6201 Michael Aletta Fax (203) 872-9663 May 5, 1997 Richard Kell RSK Kellco In 1750 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Addenda to 1363 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Ct 06074 Dear Mr. Kellff The appraisal report of August 16, 1996 of property located at 1363 Sullivan Avenue was amended to reflect the zone change to "A-20". The amended appraisal values the subject as raw land in an "A-20" zoning district. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting the subject value. It is my opinion, based on my analysis, the estimated fair market value of subject 8.3 +- acres parcel, zoned A-20, in fee simple, as of May 5, 1997 is $56,500.00. FIFTY SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS Respectfully submitted, o rt R. Morra Appraiser ADDENDA TO APPRAISAL 1363 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 The subject was appraised as being in a RR Zone. The subject is presently in an A20 Zone. The appraisal report will be amended to reflect value in an A20 Zone. HIGHEST AND BEST USE The subject could be developed into single family at 20, 000 s/f per lot with a minimal of 100 feet of frontage. The subject lot "as is" zoned A20 would have the potential of 10 buildings verses 7 lots in a RR zone. Development of the subject would also require the building of a new road and installation of sewer and public water, side walls, etc. . The subject neighborhood is developed with moderately priced homes. The potential market is for moderately priced homes. The land, therefore, would have to be moderate for a development on the subject to be economically feasible. It is my opinion, therefore, the subject's highest and best use zoned A20 is for development of moderately priced single family homes. APPROACH TO VALUE The comparable will be adjusted to the subject with consideration to the subject's highest and best use. ti ADJUSTMENTS The sales were adjusted to the subject for difference. The sales were adjusted on a per acre basis. Sale #1, 8 Clark Street, $5,714.00 per acre was adjusted: + $2, 000.00 Site conditions: The sale has 300 feet wide CL&P R.O.W. and a wetlands area 35% - $2,000. 00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject 25% + $1,150.00 Location: Subject superior to sale 200 + $1, 150.00 Net adjustment $6,864. 00 Adjusted per acre value Sale #2, Rear 44 Main Street, $2,222 .00 per acre was adjusted: + $2,000.00 Frontage: Sale has no frontage + $1,500.00 Development potential + $1.000.00 Location: Sale is 900 feet from street + $4,500.00 Net adjustment $6,722 . 00 Adjusted value per acre Sale #3, Abbe Road Extension, $9,354.00 per acre was adjusted: - $2,800.00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject, and development potential, 30% + $1,000.00 Site condition: sale has an area of wetlands 10% S 500.00 Time: Sale occurred 26 months ago, land value depreciated, 5% $2,300. 00 Net adjustment $7,054.00 Adjusted value Sale #4, 175 Lawrence Street, $6,309.00 per acre was adjusted: - $1,250.00 Frontage: Sale has significantly more frontage than subject and better development potential 20% + $1,500.00 Site condition: Sale has an area of wetlands, 25% S 300. 00 Time: Sale occurred 28 months ago, land value depreciated 5% $ 50.00 Net adjustment $6,259.00 Adjusted value per acre The adjusted sales indicated values of $6,259.00, $6,722 . 00, $6,884.00, and $7,054.00. The sales all bracket the subject value. The adjusted sales tend to indicate a value between $6,500 to $7, 000 per acre. It is my opinion the subject per acre value is $6,800. v' CONCLUSION AND RECONCILIATION The subject is an 8.3 +/- acre parcel of raw land located in an A-20 zone. The subject "as is" is not an approved building lot but is a parcel of land with potential to be developed as building lots. The subject's highest and best use was determined to be for development of single family building lots. The market data approach was developed. Four land sales were examined and adjusted to the subject. The adjusted sale indicated a value of $6,800.00 per acre x 8. 3 acres = $56,440. 00, rounded to $56,500.00. I made a careful analysis of all pertinent data effecting subject value. It is my opinion, the subject's estimated fair market "as is" as of August 16, 1996 in fee simple is $56,500. FIFTY SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS Respectfully submitted, R 2bi Morra Appraiser '4\ RSK-KELLEDINC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 Y Ma 19 1997 i»�} MAY 21 1997 Marcia Bannach, Planner South Windsor Town of South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision Bond and Reduction of Same Enclosed is the Bond Estimate Form required by the Town of South Windsor for the setting of a subdivison bond. Bruce has completed the original cost, using the Town's Unit Prices, and determined it to be $269,261. 00. The twenty-five percent contingency required makes the total subdivision bond $336, 576. 00. At the same time he has calculated the work remaining to be completed, including contingency, at $76,916. 00. It would be very much appreciated if this bond could be set and reduced at the May 27, 1997, meeting of Planning and Zoning. If anything further is required from this office, please call. Thanks in advance for your attention to this matter. Yours truly, Carol S. Kelle fstbond We Build u d Our Reputation TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROJECT: Fieldstone STREET: Heritage Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.• ENGINEER: B.Ke l l ey 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: 5/19/97 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing& Grubbing LS 1000 * 1.000 0 2. Strip &Stockpile 841 1,682 0 To soil CY 2.00 3. Earth Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadwax &Trench) CY 10.00 4. Roadway Excavation CY 1,249 12.00 14,988 0 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0=4 CY ----- 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-1 Y ----- 12.00 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-15 CY --- 15.00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 18.00 9. Roadway Exc. Rock CY ----- .0 10. Rock Trench Exe. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY ----- 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc. -20 ----- 150.00 14. Formation of Sub grade SY 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 15. Subbase Gravel CY 500 20.00 10,000 0 16. Processed AgUegate TONS 700 18.00 12,600 0 17, Common Borrow Cy ----- 10 .00 18. Gravel Borrow CY ----- 15.00 19, 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 205 10,250 0 (Class I TONS 50.00 20. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 195 10,725 10,725 Cl II TONS *vie S.T. $10,725 Page 1 Sub-Total$ 64,998,00 i BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond , Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Ouantitv Prine Cost No. 1 No. 2 21, 6" Asphalt Lip CurbingLF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22. Road Widening m 1 t Y 139 50.00 6,950 6,950 (228') 2 n Sidewalk 4' WideLF 75330,00 22,590 6,840 STORM DRAINAGE Y M COMPONENTS 24. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 130.00 25. 54" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 100.00 26, 4 " RCP Class IV In Place F ----- 75.00 27. 42' RCP Class IV In Place L ----- . 65.00 28. " RCP Class IV In Plaoe LF ----- 60.00 29. RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 50.00 0. 24" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 42.00 1. 18" RCP Class IV In Place LF 14835.00 5,180 0 2. 15" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 30.00 3. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8" AD -N-]2 or Eaual ----- 21 .00 35, 1 " AD -N-12 -"-- 22.50 36. 12" AD -N-12 or F4ual ----- 24.00 7. 1 " ADS-N-12 or Eaual 592 25.50 15,096 0 38. ] " ADS-N-12 or F4ual178 28.00 4;984 0 UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 1,255 imo 18,825 0 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF ----- 20.00 0 RIPRAP 41. Modified RipEpR 30 45.00 1,350 0 S.T. $13,790 Page 2. Sub-Total$80 555.00 I BOND ESTIMATE FORM t` Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description niQuantity Price No. 1 No. 2 42 Intemediate Riprap CY ----- 45.00 0 4 Standard Ri a ----- . 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. TxRg "C" Catch Basin EA 1 8 r2000.00 12,000 0 45. T " Double Grate EA ----- 46. T -L" Catch Basin EA ----- 1500.00 47 Manhole EA 1 1500.00 1,500 0 48. Manhole wfDrop Inlet EA 1 2500.00 2,500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA ----- 2000.00 50. Headwall EA ----- 1 Endwall EA ----- 2 x Culvert LF ----- 53. 1 " Flared End EA ----- 450.00 54, 1 " Flared End EA ' 500.00 500 • 0 55, 24" Flared End EA ----- 56. Flared End EA ----- 85 .00 7 Sedimentation Structure 1 2000. 2,000 0 8 10' Wide 59 Gravel Access Road LF 810 15.0() 12, 150 12,150 60. Reset M HC.B. EA ----- . 550.00 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 1. 12" PVC In Place SDR 1 35 LF ----- 40.00 2 1 " PVC In Plum F ----- 37.00 63, " PVC Place SDR 35 LF 1,088 35.00 38,080 64, " PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 362 30,go 10,860 * varies S.T. $12,150 age 3. Sub-Total$79,590.00 BOND ESTIMATE Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descril2tion Unit Quantity Pt ice cost No. 1 No. 2- -SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65, Sanitia Manhole EA 6 • 1 9,000 0 66. Sanitaa Manhole 1 2,500 0 w[Dro2 Inlet EA 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 1 1 2000.00 2,000 1 0 68. 69, STRUCTURES &MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF ----- 71. Fence LF ----- * 72. Guide Rail LF ----- 73. End Anchorage ----- EA 74. Guide Post iEA ----- 1 .07 Pav Markin 25 1 37.50 37.50 7 trees i s I 1 75.00 75 75.00 77. Traffic Sigm EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 78. Street Ligbts EA 2 1000.00 2,000 0 79, Furnishing 2,456 6, 140 6, 140.00 Macing ToMil SY 2.50 80, Fertilizing, Seeding 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 and Mulching l Trees EA 26 150.00 3,900 13,900.00 82. Maintenance/Protection 1,000 1,000 0 f Traffic *,000 2,000 0 83. Construction akin varies S.T.$16,367.50 * Page 4. Sub-Total$34,867.50 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item DesaiRtion Unit Guantitv Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 84, As-Builts LS 1,500 * 1,500 750 85. Iron Pins EA 30 100.00 3,000 3,000 86. Concrete Monuments EA 19 250,00 4,750 4,750 7 Driveway-Bit, Conc, SY ----- 20.00 88. 89. 90. S.T.$8,500 Sub�Total$ 9,250.00 Sub-Total Page 1 $ 64,998.00 $10,725.00 Sub-Total Page 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3$ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$ 34,868.00. 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5$ 9,250.00 8,500.00 Sub-Total$ 269,261.00 $61,533.00 25%Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 67,315.00 15,383.00 TOTAL$ 336,576 $76,916.00 * varies Page 5. z/BONDESTFORM/16m95 a� TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROJECT: Fieldstone i STREET: Heritage Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.• ENGINEER: B.Kelley 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: 5/19/97 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearinz& Grubbing LS 1000 * 1 000 0 2. Strip & Stockpile 841 1,682 0 Topsoil Cy 2.00 3. Earth Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadway &Trench) CY 10.0 4. Roadway RoadwAy Excavation CY 1,249 12.00 14,988 0 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0.4 CY ----- 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 12.00 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-1 Y ----- 15.00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 18.00 9. Roadway Exc. Rock CY ----- 50.00 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY ----- 10 .00 13. Rock Trench Exc. -20 CY ----- 150.00 14. Formation of Sub ade SY 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 15. Subbase Gravel CY 500 20.00 10,000 0 16. Processed Aggregate TONS 700 18.00 12,600 0 17. Common Borrow Y ----- 10.00 18. Gravel Borrow Y ----- 1 0 19. 1.5 "Bit. Concrete 205 10,250 0 Class I TON 50. 20. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 195 10,725 10,725 (Class II TONS *varies S.T. $10,725 Page 1 Sub-Total$ 64,998,00 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond , Unit Reduction Reduction ? Item Description nit Ouantiv Price t No. 1 No. 2 21, 6" Asphalt Lip CurbingLF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22. Road Widening m 1 t Y 139 6,950 6,950 (228') 23, Conc Sidewalk 4' Wide LF 753 3o.00 22,590 6,840 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 24. 6 " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 130.00 25. 54" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 100.00 26. 48" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 75.00 27. 42" RCP Class IV In Place L ----- 65.00 28. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 60.00 29. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 50.00 0. 24" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 42.00 1. 18" RCP Class IV In Place LF 14835.00 5,180 0 2. 15" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 30.00 3. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8" AD -N-12 or F4ual ----- 21 .00 35 1 " ADS-N-12 ----- 22.50 36. 12" AD - -12 or F4ual ----- 24.00 7. 1 " ADS-N-12 or F4ual 592 25.50 15,096 0 38. 1 " ADS-N-12 or F4Wal 178 28.00 4,984 0 UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Moe LF 1,25515.00 18,825 0 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF ----- 20.00 0 RIPRAP 41. Modified Ripja2 CY 30 1 45.00 1 1,350 0 S.T. $13,790 Page 2. Sub-Total$80,555.00 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond t Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri2tion Unit Quantity Price No. 1 No. 2 42 Intermediate Ri r ----- 45.00 0 43. Standard Ri a ----- 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. TYRA "C" Catch Basin EA 8 1500.00 12,000 0 45. T " Double Grate EA ----- 2000.00 46. T -L" Catch Basin EA 47. Manhole EA 1 1500.00 1,500 0 48. Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA 1 2500.00 2,500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA ----- 2000.00 50. Headwall EA ----- 1 Endwall EA ----- 2. Box Culvert x LF ----- 3. 1 " Flared End EA ----- 54, 4 1 " Flared End EA 1 500.00 500 - 0 5. 24" Flared End EA ----- 550.00 56. " Flared End EA ----- 850.00 7 Sedimentation Structure 1 2000. 2,000 0 58. 10' Wide 59. Gravel Access Road LF 810 15.00 12,150 12,150 60. Reset M HC.B. EA ----- 50.0 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 61. 12" PVC In Plwe SDR 35 LF ----- 40.00 2 1 " PVC In Place D F ----- 7 .00 63, " PVC In Place SDR 5 LF 1,088 35.00 38,080 0 64. " PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 362 30.00 10,860 0 varies S.T. $12,150 * Page 3. Sub-Total$7 9,5 90.00 BOND ESTIMATE Bond Bond Unlit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit Quantity n ice cost No. 1 No. 2 ` SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65. Sanitga Manhole EA 6 1 9,000 0 66. Sanitary Manhole 1 2,500 0 w[Drop Inlet EA 2500.C.` 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 1 2000.0 2,000 0 68. 69, ,STRUCTURES&MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF ----- 71. Fence LF ----- * 72. Guide Rail LF ----- * 73. End Anchoragg ___-- EA 74. Guide Post EA ----- 100.00 75, Pavement Marking LF 25 I 37.50 37.50 76. Street Signs EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 77. Traffic Sigm EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 78. Street Lights EA 2 1000.00 2,000 0 79, Furnishing 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 /Placing ToMil SY 2.50 80, Fertilizing, Seeding 2,456 6, 140 6,140.00 and Mulching 1. Trees EA 26 150.00 3,900 13,900.00 82. Maintenance/Protection 1,000 1,000 0 f Traffic *,000 2,000 0 83. Construction akin *varies S.T.$16,367.50 Page 4. Sub-Total$34,867.50 t' • BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 84, -Builts LS 1,500 * 1,500 750 85. Iron Pins EA 30 100.00 3,000 3,000 86. Concrete Monuments EA 19 250.00 4,750 4,750 7. Driveway- it Y ----- 20.00 88. 89. 90. S.T.$8,500 Sub•Total$ 9,250.00 Sub-Total Page 1 $ 64,998.00 $10,725.00 Sub-Total Page 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3$ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$ 34,868.00. 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5$ 9,250.00 8,500.00 Sub-Total$ 269,261.00 $61,533.00 25% Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 67,315.00 15,383.00 TOTAL$ 336,576 $76,916.00 * varies Page 5. lvallez/SONDES TFORMA6=95 n ,4 FUSS&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040-5921 TEL 860 646-2469 FAX 86o 643-6313 1200 Converse Street,Longmeadow,MA 01106-1721 TEL 413 567-9886 FAX 413 567-8936 Providence,RI TEL 401 828-3510 May 21, 1997 Mr. Jerry Iazzetta Town Engineer Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: RSK-Kellco, Inc. Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Mr. Iazetta: On May 20, 1997, I inspected the excavation for the sanitary sewer manhole to be placed over the existing sewer line west of Pierce Road to tie in the subject project. This area is over a deep clay area that has given problems in the past. The excavation had been open for awhile and the clay appeared to be stable. The only water present was what was running through the bedding for the sewer line. It was not a large flow with a pump keeping the hole dry. Our recommendation is to place about 6" - 8" of stone under pipe and over the top of pipe, wrapped with filter fabric. This will give ample support for the manhole. The excavation should be backfilled before any rain that will wet the clay. If you have any questions,please call. Sincerely, Glenn J. Mirtl, P.E., L.S. Associate /pig RECE�VEO s N c: Mr. Bruce Kelly MAY 2 2 1997 SOUTH WINDSOR ENG.DEPT. �t'b TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR r PROJECT: Fieldstone STREET: Heritage Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: ENGINEER: B.Ke lley 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: 5/19/9 7 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Gnibbine LS 1000 * 1.000 0 2. Strip & Stockpile 841 1,682 0 To soil CY 2,00 3. Earth Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadway &Trench) CY 10.0 4. Roadway Excavation CY 1,249 12.00 14.988 0 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 12.0 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-1 ----- 15.00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 18.00 9. Roadway Exc. Rock CY ----- .0 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY ----- 100.00 13 Rock Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 150.00 14. Formation of Sub grade SY 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 15. Subbase Gravel CY 500 20.00 10,000 0 16. Processed Aggregate TONS 700 18.00 12,600 0 17. Common Borrow CY ----- 10.00 18. Gravel Borrow CY ----- 1 19. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 205 10,250 0 Class I TONS 50.00 20. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 195 10,725 10,725 (Class II TONS *varies S.T. $10,725 Page 1 Sub-Total$ 64,9 9 8,00 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond , Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit OWntity Price t No. 1 No. 2 21, 6" Asphalt Lip CurbingLF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22. Road Widening m 1 t Y 139 50.006,950 6,950 23, ConcSidewalk 4' Wide LF30.00 753 22,590 (226,840 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM CMPONENTS 24. 6 " RCP Class TV In Place LF ----- 130.00 25. 54" RCP Class TV In PIace LF ----- 100.00 26. 48" RCP Class TV In Place LF ----- 75.00 27. 42" RCP Class TV In Place L ----- 65.00 28. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 60.00 29. " RCP Class TV In Place LF 0. 24" RCP Class TV In Place LF ----- 42.00 1. 18" RCP Class TV In Place LF 14835.00 5,180 0 2. 15" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 30.00 33. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8" AD -N-12 or ual ----- 21 .00 5. 1 " ADS-N-12 or F4ual ----- 22.50 36. 12" AD -N-12 or F4ual ----' 24.00 7. 1 " ADS-N-12 or Equal 592 25.50 15,096 0 8. 1 " ADS-N-12 al 17828.00 4,584 0 UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 1,255 15.00 18,825 0 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF ----- 20.00 0 RIPRAP 41. Modified RiIK412 CY 30 45.00 1,350 0 S.T. $13,790 Page 2. Sub-Total$80,555.00 i BOND ESTIMATE FORM ` Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item DescriRtion Unit uantitv Price No. 1 No. 2 42 Intennediate Ri r ----- 4 0 43. Standard RipjaR CY ----- 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. T Basin EA 8 1500.00 12,000 0 45. T " Double Grate EA ----- 2000.00 46. T -L" Catch Basin EA ----- 1 0 47 Manhole EA 1 1 1,500 0 48. Manhole w/Dro Inlet EA 1 2500.0 2,500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA ----- 2000.00 50, Headwall EA ----- 1 Endwall EA ----- 2 Box Culvert x LF ----- 53. 1 " Flared End EA ----- 450.00 54, " Flared End EA 1 500.00 500 • 0 55, 24" FlaredEnd EA ----- 550.00 56. " Flared End EA ----- 850.00 7 Sedimentation Structure 1 2000. 2,000 0 8 10' Wide 9, Gravel Access Road LF 810 1 0 12,150 12,150 60. Reset M.H. C.B. EA ----- 50.0 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS ` 1. 12" PVC In Place SDR35 LF I ----- 40.00 2 1 " PVC In Place SDR. 35 LF 37.00 63, " PVC In Place SDR 5 LF 1,088 38,080 " PV In P1 DR F 362 10,8600 t * S.T. $12,150 varies Page 3. Sub-Total$79,590.00 BOND ESTIMATE • Bond Bond Ulit Reduction Reduction Item Description nit QuantitX Pc ice Cost — N . 1 N . 2 J SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65, Sanitna Manhole EA 6 1 9,000 0 66. Sanitary Manhole 1 2,500 0 wfDroR Inlet EA 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 1 2000.(=0 2,000 0 68. 69, STRUCTURES&MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF ----- 7l. Fence LF 72, Guide Rail LF ----- * 73. End Anchorage ----- EA 74. Guide Post EA ----- 100.00 75, Pavement Marking LF 25 1.50 37.50. 37.50 7 . Street Signs EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 77. Traffic Si&M EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 7 . Street Lights EA 2 1000,00 2,000 0 -79, F rnishinz cingT i 2,456 2 6,140 6,140.00 ` 80. Fertilizing, Seeding 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 Mulching 1 Trees EA 26 150.00 3,900 3 900.00 82. Maintenance/Protection 11000 1,000 0 f Traffic 2,000 2,000 0 83. Construction akin *varies S.T.$16,367.50 Page 4. Sub-Total$34,867.50 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond ? Unit Reduction Reduction c Item DescriRtion Unit Quantity Price cost No. I No. 2 84, As-Builts LS 1•,500 * 1,500 750 Pin EA 30 100.00 3,000 3,000 6. Concrete Monuments EA 19 250.00 4,750 4,750 7 Driveway-Bit, Conc, SY — 20.00 88. 89. 90. S.T.$8,500 Sub•Total$ 9,250.00 . Sub-Total Page 1 $ 64,998.00 $10,725.00 Sub-Total Page 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3$ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$ 34,868.00 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5$ 9,250.00 8,500.00 Sub-Total$ 269,261.00 $61,533.00 25%Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 67,315.00 15,383.00 TOTAL$ 336,576 $76,916.00 *varies Page 5. 1va11er/80NDESTF0RM/Yorm95 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Enginee DATE: May 23, 1997 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION — 96-58P We have reviewed the bond estimate for the Fieldstone Subdivision and recommend that it be set at $374,000.00. We have also reviewed the request for a bond reduction and recommend that it be reduced to $83.000.00. Attached is a copy of the bond estimate for your records. JCl/jsv i TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROJECT: Fieldstone STREET: Heritage Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.• ENGINEER: B.Kelley 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: 5/19/9 7 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing& Grubbinz LS 1000 * 1.000 0 2. Strip &Stockpile 841 1,682 0 Topsoil 2.00 3. Earth Excavation ------ ----- (Excluding Roadway &Trench) CY 10.00 4 Roadway Excavation CY 1,249 12.00 14,988 0 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 10.0 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY zoi8 12.00 z �2 O 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-15 CY 9y 15,00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 18.00 9. Roadway Exc. Rock CY 50.00 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY ----- 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc. -20 CY ----- 150.00 14. Formation of Sub grade SY 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 15 Subbase Gravel CY 500 20.00 10,000 0 16. Processed AggLegate TONS 700 18.0 12,600 0 17. Common Borrow ----- 10 .00 18. Gravel Borrow CY ----- 15,00 19. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 205 10,250 0 Class I TONS 0. 20. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 195 10,725 10,725 (Class II TONS *varies S.T. $10,725 9o,6z�.00 Page 1 Sub-Total$-643.498-r90 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Desaiption Unit 6jantity Price t No. 1 No. 2 21, 6" Asphalt U12 CurbingLF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22. Road Widening m 1 t Y 139 50,00 6,950 6,950 23, ConcSidewalk 4' Wide LF 753 _30.00 22,590 (226,840 STORM DRAINAGE SY=M COMPONENTS 24. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- ] 30.00 25. 54" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 100.00 26, 48"'RCP ClassTV In Place LF ----- 7 5.00 27. 42" RCP Class IV In Place L ---- - 65.00 - 28. 36" RCP Class IV In Place LF 60.00 29. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 50.00 0. 24" RCP Class IV in Place LF ----- 42 1. 18" RCP Class IV In Place LF 14835.00 5,180 0 2. 15" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 30.00 33. POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8" AD -N-12 or Egual ----- 21 .00 1 " AD -N-12 or F.Qual ----- 22.50 36. 12" AD -N-12 or F4ual ----- 24.00 7. ] " ADS-N-12 or F.Qual 592 15,096 0 38, l " ADS-N-12 17828.00 4,984 0 ` UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 1,25515.00 18,825 0 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF ----- 20.00 0 RIPRAP 41. Modified Ripc aR CY 30 45.00 1,350 0 S.T. $13,790 Page 2. Sub-Total$80,555.00 i BOND ESTIMATE FORM ` Bond Bond t Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description nit antit PriceNo. 1 No. 2 42 InterTnediate Riprap 45.00 0 43. Standard RJR[ap 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. T Basin EA 8 1500.00 12,000 0 45. T " Double Grate EA ----- 2000 00 46. T -L" Catch Basin EA ----- 1 500.00 47 Manhole EA 1 1500.00 1,500 0 48. Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA 1 2500.00 2,500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA ----- 2000.00 50. Headwall EA ----- 1 Endwall EA ----- 2 Box CulvW x LF ----- 53, 1 " Flared End EA ----- 450.00 54, ] " Flared End EA 1 500.00 500 • 0 55, 24" Flared End EA ----- 550.00 56. " Flared End EA ----- 850-09 7 Sedimentation Structure 1 2000. 2,000 0 8 10' Wide 59. Gravel Access Road LF 810 15,00 12,150 12,150 60. Reset M HC.B. EA ----- . 550.00 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENT 61. 12" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF ----- 40.00 2 1 " PVC In Place SDR 35 LF ----- 7 .00 63, " PVC In Place DR 35 LF 1,088 35.00 38,080 64, " PVC In Place SDR 15 LF 362 30.00 10,860 0 *varies S.T. $12,150 Page 3. Sub-Total$79,590.00 BOND ESTIMATE Bond Bond US lit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit antic R ice Cost N . 1 No. 2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65. Sanitia Manhole EA 6 1 9,000 0 66. Sanitary Manhole 1 2,500 0 wfDrola Inlet EA 2 00.f ) 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 1 2000.(0 2,000 0 68. 69, STRUCTURES &MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF ----- 71. Fence LF 72. Guide Rail LF 73. End Anchoragg EA 74. Guide Post EA ----- 100.00 7 PavementMarking__ LF 25 1 37.50 37.50 76. Street Signs EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 77. Traffic Sigm EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 78. StreetLights 2 1000.00 2,000 0 79. Furnishing 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 [Pladng Topmil SY 2 80, Fertilizing, Seeding 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 and Mulching 1. Trees EA 26 150.00 3,900 3,900.00 82. Maintenance/Protection 1,000 1,000 0 fTraffic 2,000 2,000 0 83. Construction takin * varies S.T.$16,367.50 Page 4. Sub-Total$34,867.50 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction c Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 /Sd O 84, -Builts 1,500 * 1,500 ----q-5$ 85. Iron Pins EA 30 1 3,000 3,000 86. Concrete Monuments EA 19 25 p.00 4,750 4,750 ZOO 7 Driveway-Bit, Conc, SY - 20.00 �aDo ODO 88. 89. 90. Sul.-.,Total 13,Z Sd Sub-Total Page 1 $ 90, ,(Z1100 $10,725.00 Sub-Total Page 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3 $ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$ 34,868.00 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5$ ZS-0 Sub-Total$ Z 25% Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 2 155.,.3.g"O- /G S 7/ TOTAL$ 336,='*'`'^ .Y73 9,0 9 $76,916.09 8 ZPS'v" sp r .3,yr yo00 s�y Bs o00 * varies Page S. 1vs11cz 0NDESTFORM/lorm95 f aC Af vow I, 9d 00, g6-r8P Ap t TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROJECT: Fieldstone STREET: Heritasze Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: ENGINEER: B.Kelley 1996 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: 5/19/97 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Descri tion Unit QuantityPrice Cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS 1000 * 1.000 0 2. Strip & Stockpile 841 1,682 0 Topsoil CY 2.00 3. Earth Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadway & Trench) CY 10.00 4. Roadway Excavation CY 1,249 12.00 14,988 0 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 10.0 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-1 2o/& 12.00 2 0 7. Earth Trench Exc. 0-1 CY 9.1 15.00 8. Earth Trench Exc. 0-20 CY ----- 18.00 9. Roadwa Exc. Rock CY ----- 50.00 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11. Rock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 CY ----- 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc. -20 CY ----- 150.00 14. Formation of Sub grade SY 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 15 Subbase Gravel CY 500 20.00 10,000 0 16. Processed AggLegate TONS 700 18.00 12,600 0 17. Common Borrow ----- 10.00 - 18. Gravel Borrow CY ----- 15.00 19. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 205 10,250 0 Class I TONS 50.00 20. 1.5 " Bit. Concrete 195 10,725 10,725 Clas II T N55.00 *varies S.T. $10,725 90,6211.00 Page 1 Sub-Total$-6+-,99 yQ0 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Des ti nit antic Price t No. 1 No. 2 21 Asphalt U2 CurbingLF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22. Road Widen in g-Com2lete SY 139 50.00 6,950 6,950 2 n id walls 4' Wi LF 753 22, ,590 `226 840 STORM DRAINAGE SYSMM CoMPONENM 24. " RCP Class ]V]n Place LF ----- ] 30.00 25. 54" RCP CI&ss IV In Place LF ----- 10 .00 26, 4 " RCP Class IV In-Place F ----- 7 27 42" RCP Class IV In Place L ----- 65.00 28. " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 60.00 2 " RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 0. 24" RCP Class IV in Place LF ----- 42. 00 1. 18" RCP Class TV-In Place LF 148 35.00 5,180 0 2. 15" RCP Class IV In Place LF ----- 30.00 33. -A POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. 8" ADS-N-12orF4ual ----- 21 .00 35, ] " AD -N-l2 or Equal ----- .50 36. 12" AD -N-]2 or Eaual ----- 24.00 7. ] " ADS-N-12 ual 592 2 15,096 0 38. ] " ADS-N-12 or FMal 178 28.00 4,084 0 - UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 1,255 15.00 18,825 0 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF ----- 20.00 0 RIPRAP 41. Modifled RiIK82 CY 30 45.00 1,350 0 S.T. $13,790 Page 2. Sub-Total$80,555.00 BOND ESTIMATE FORM i. Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item DescriRtion Unit 4antitPriceNo. 1 No. 2 42 Intermediate Ri r 4 0 4 tandard Ri a A5.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. T Basin EA 8 1500.00 12,000 0 45. T " Double Grate EA ----- 2000 00 46. T -L" Catch Basin EA ----- -1500,00 47. Manhole EA 1 f500.00 1,500 0 48. Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA 1 2500.00 2,500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feet EA ----- 2000.00 50. Headwall EA ----- 1 Endwall EA ----- 2 Box Culven LF ----- 53. 1 " Flared End EA ----- 450.00 54, ] " Flared End EA 1 500,00 500 . 0 55, 24" Flared End EA ----- 550.00 56. " Flared End EA ----- 0. 00 57, Sedimentation Structure 1 2000. 2,000 0 8. 10' Wide 59. Gravel Ac= Road LF 810 15.00 12, 150 12,150 60. Reset M.H. or C.B. EA ----- . 550.00 SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 61. 12" PVC In Place SDR LF ----- 40.00 2 1 " PVC In P JF ----- 7 63, " PV P DR 1,088 38,080 64, " PVCIn PI DR 362 30.00 10,860 * varies S.T. $12,150 Page 3. Sub-Total$79,590.00 t BOND-ESTIMATE Bond Bond U:iit Reduction Reduction Item Description nit antic Pc ice Cost No. I No. 2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65. SanitmX-Manhole EA 6 1500, 91000 0 66. Sanitary Manhole 1 2,500 0 w[Dro2 Inlet EA 2500.E ) 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT EA 1 2000.(0 2,000 0 68. 69, STRUCTURES & MISC. ITEMS 70. Retaining Wall LF ----- 71. Fence LF 72. Guide Rail LF 73. End Anchoragg 74. Guide Post EA ----- 100.00 75, Pavement Marking F 25 1.50 37.50 37.50 7 Street Signs EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 77. Traffic SiSM EA 1 75.00 75 75.00 78, StreetLights FA 2 1000.00 2,000 0 79. Fu n rhing it 2,456 2TqM 6,140 6,140.00 Maci1. 80, Fertilizing, Seeding 2,456 6,140 6,140.00 and Mulching 1. Trees EA 26 150.00 3,900 31900.00 82. Maintenance/Protection 11000 11000 0 f Traffic 2,000 2,000 0 83. Construction Staking * varies S.T.$16,367.50 Page 4. Sub-Total$34,86 7.50 i' BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction c Item Descri tion Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 84. /so 0 -Builts 1,500 * 1,500 —758- 85. Iron Pins EA 30 100.00 3,000 3,000 86. Concrete Monuments EA 19 250.00 4,750 4,750 7 Driveway-Bit, zoo Y - 20.00 ed, 88. 89. 90. T- S.T.$8,500- / I_FZs-V Sub•Total$ 9-r259,40 Sub-Total Page 1 $ 90, 4rZy 00 $10,725.00 Sub-Total Page 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3 $ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$ 34,868.00 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5 S 4r54&-9e- /3,Z S'o Sub-Total$ Z 98 e&8 7 257b Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ 7/ TOTAL$ 336,5 6-/.?73, 9-0 9 $;6,916v 8 Z 8SV si4 y -3f y000 s�y 83 00o * varies Page S. /v811er/B0NDESTF0RM/1orm95 .COW N SfC -SIC3UM T&U/440t y 4 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 o mac. OSox•co�r AREA CODE 860/644-2511 May 28, 1997 Carol Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, Ct 06074 Dear Mrs. Kelley: Re: Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on May 27, 1997 to reduce the subdivision bond for the above-referenced project from $374,000 to $83,000. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of the mylar in the Town Clerk's office. Very truly yours, 7 NING & Z ,NING COMMISSION Russell G. Le?ack, CLhairman , RGL/pmm cc: Town Engineer f 1OW N Sf4 C s cv 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 '�fiOsox cow AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 25, 1997 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK Kellco Co. Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Kelley: An inspection of Heritage Drive has shown that the structures in the pavement have not been shimmed. Shims must be in place by October 15, 1997 and must be in accordance with Town Standards. (See attached) If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 644-2511, Extension 245. Very truly yours, 0 et zet n er JCl/jsv cc: Melvin C. Stead, Jr., Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer 1 UMN Ur Jvv i i i vviivvwr\ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS 1.6.0 Shimming Bituminous Class II shims are to be installed for the protection of facilities i.e. in tops, manhole frames and utility gates) during the time the binder catch basin tY 9 ) 9 P � r pavement surface is left exposed until the final coat of pavement is course p P applied. Shimming can be accomplished one of two ways. A. Be incorporated in binder course when being installed, Pavement to be graded as such to accommodate shim formula for every 1/4 inch of rise of facility above pavement equals 1 foot diameter of shim. Binder to be finished graded 1/4 inch higher than existing facility surface, for their protection from snow removal equipment. B. Can be installed separately after binder course is installed. Class II bituminous concrete to be used following shim formula for every 1/4 inch of rise of facilities above pavement equals 1 foot diameter of shim. The exception when applying fomula to catch basin tops specifically, length of shim on front of catch basin top will be six inches for every. 1/4 inch of rise. Shim to be graded 1/4 inch higher than existing facility surface for their protection from snow removal equipment. Prior to separate shim installment, a tack coat must be used to adhere shim to binder course. Outside edge of shims to be sealed with tack coat to prevent premature deterioration of shim (i.e. chipping, cracking, or flaking). 1 SHIM A MANHOLE A c c B B CATCH BASIN CURB SHIM SHIM SHIM 12' 1/4' 1/4' BASE PVMT. FRAME 4 GRATE TACK COAT ON BASE PVMT. A-A SHIM 12, 1/4' 1/4' FRAME & LID BASE PVMT. !!� OF MANHOLE TACK COAT ON BASE PVMT. SHIM 6' 1/4' � C-C � BASE PVMT. TACK COAT FRAME GRATE ON BASE PVMT. B-B NOT TO SCALE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDS❑R TEMPORARY SHIM DETAIL APPROVED STANDARD DETAIL DUNE, 1997 REVISER PUBLIC VORKS DIRECTOR j Memorandum To: Jerry Iazzetta From: Mel Stead Re: Shimming streets under construction Date: September 25 1997 Attached is Ron's report of existing conditions in the subdivisions that have binder course pavement on the streets. We seem to have difficulty every year trying to get developer cooperation in making appropriate repairs prior to cold weather setting in. Would you please generate a letter to each of the responsible parties so that we can have the work completed prior to the winter season. Thank you. , ! I s Memorandum To: Mel Stead From: Ron Asselin �Y Subject: Shims Date: September 25, 1997 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've made my annual inspection of new subdivisions in preparation of snow removal. My inspection has revealed the following observations which will have to be attended to by the respective contractors before its snows this winter season: • Chase Farms- Shims are too short and are too high. Shims around most facilities are damaged already from this condition. The shims need to be repaired and improved to meet our Public Improvement spec's. • Partridge Meadow II- Intersection of Trumbull Lane and Dart Hill Road. Trumbull Lane pavement exits at too sharp of a vertical angle. This condition will cause the removal of snow from this intersection difficult. Plows traveling north and exiting Trumbull 1;ane will dig into the pavement on Dart Hill Road. This will cause damage to the pavement on Dart Hill Road. It will also make it difficult to remove the snow from the shoulder of Dart Hill Road which runs perpendicular to Trumbull Lane. Because of the sharp angles where the two pavements meet at the intersection, snow will get trapped and will be difficult to remove. This will develop into a traffic hazard in the winter. • Cliff'wood Drive ext.-Shims are too short and are too high. Shims that where installed last year are damaged or have been removed by snow removal equipment. They will need repairs and improvement to meet the Public Improvement spec's. • Hitchcock Way- Shims are inadequate. They have been installed too short and are too high. The shims will have to be improved. •` ' 006 o shims have been installed on Heritage Drive. This will have to be completed before snow removal. Shims to be installed per Public Improvement spec's. • Fitch Meadow- There are no shims or curbing on the extension of Fitch Meadow Lane. Shims and curbing will have to be installed before snow. Also shims on older section are barely adequate. Most of the facilities on the older section have already have been damaged. Damage to the facilities was due to the inadequacy of the original shims being installed that were too short not meeting Pubic Improvement spec's. • Farmbrook- Shim around sanitary manhole on Scott Drive in poor condition from being g re damaged last season. Shim will have to be aired. Shim around catch basin in front p of lot #6 on Farmbrook lane is also damaged from last season, It also needs to be repaired. Shims have been installed to adequate proportions but have failed because of the lack of use of emulsion for tack coating. Please note numerous catch basin tops and manhole frames exhibit severe damage and should be replaced before final acceptance of the road. • Collins Crossing- Will binder course be installed and any co's issued before or during this winter season. If so shims around facilities should be in place per Public Improvement spec's The installation or repair work to shims should be completed prior to October 15th for the best results. After the 15th will require written permission to the Director of Public Works by the respective contractors to complete their work. The work is necessary to prevent injury to operators, damage to equipment and to remove snow efficiently and effectively. cc: Scott Lappen i OWtV OF SOUTH WINDSOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS w 1.6.0 Shimming Bituminous Class II shims are to be installed for the protection of facilities (i.e. catch basin tops, manhole frames, and utility gates) during the time the binder course pavement surface is left exposed until the final coat of pavement is applied. Shimming can be accomplished one of two ways. A. Be incorporated in binder course when being installed, Pavement to be graded as such to accommodate shim formula for every 1/4 inch of rise of facility above pavement equals 1 foot diameter of shim. Binder to be finished graded 1/4 inch higher than existing facility surface, for their protection from snow removal equipment. B. Can be installed separately after binder course is installed. Class II bituminous concrete to be used following shim formula for every 1/4 inch of rise of facilities above pavement equals 1 foot diameter of shim. The exception when applying fomula to catch basin tops specifically, length of shim on front of catch basin top will be six inches for every 1/4 inch of rise. Shim to be graded 1/4 inch higher than existing facility surface for their protection from snow removal equipment. Prior to separate shim installment, a tack coat must be used to adhere shim to binder course. Outside edge of shims to be sealed with tack coat to prevent premature deterioration of shim (i.e. chipping, cracking, or flaking). MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planni g FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: October 8, 1997 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the September 27, 1997 request for a bond reduction at the Fieldstone subdivision and recommend that the bond be reduced to $48,000.00. Attached is a copy of the bond estimate for your records. JCl/jsv Attachment TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Fieldstone PFt01RCI':, . _- _-- BOND iSTIlv1A-I`E FORM t 'STREET: U r'itne Drive ENGINEER: B.Kelley_— 1996 CALENDAR YEAR. DATE: 5/19/9 7 l3o nd Unit Raiuction 1tcduct I.tern Description Unit Clearingin 1000 Strip $c StQckpile 841 1,682 0 2,00 3 ,gam Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadway - d Rovidway Excavation CY 1,2491-_14,9880 -4 CY ----- 10,99 7 Trench Fe Y pAl 1-5.00 /41/4 Earth Trench Exc -20 CY ----- 18.QQ 9. wa ----- 5100 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- 50.00 11, R k Trench Ex 0-10 CY ----- 75.00 ----- Rock TmnM Ex -20 CY 150.00 14, Formation of Subzrade Sy 2,502 1.50 3,753 0 500 1 20.00 10 000 0 1 700 12 600 0 7 mmon 1.8., Gravel ---—_-- 1 Borrow CY ----- 15.00 1+5 " Bit, Concrete 205 10,250 0 ,,1;,55 .. Bit, �:oncretrs 195. 10,725 10,725 a II T *� S.T. $10,725 $10,725.00 90,6.zc/.40 Page 1 Sub-Total$ A0 TOWN OF SOUTH WiNDSOR ID : 860-644-37 1 JUN 12 ' 9 16 :t)u 1,du .ui2 1-' .02 BOND,E571MATE FORM Flood Bond Unit Rcduction Roduction hem ti nti 21, » 1,860 51580 0 2 a Widenjog, etc 139 5g,00 6,950 6,950 0 (228') 23, Cone 4' Wide LF 753 10.00 22,590 6,840 6,840 E SYMM Co 4EQNENTS 25 « R p a ----- 30, 24" R P 42 .00 31, « RCP CIm TV In Plam F 148 35.00 5,180 0 PO�.Y6�CL N�_PFPE 34, „ Equal —_— . 21.00 1 « 7 Ecual592 15,096 0 28, 1 " AD -N-12 178. 1 28.00 4,084 0 -" UNDERDRA.IN5 39, " PVg,SDR 35 TaZj&2 LE 1,25515.00 18,825 0 RIPRAP 41 M ifko R12CO2 30 11350 0 S.T. $13,790 $6,840 Page 2• Sub-Total$80,555.00 UI.I.IH Ur JUUIIi LU1I'I11,yUF, 1L • +UU--U4q-,) IQ1 JV114 1 r ' J30ND �.MMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Roduction Roduction ant 1 4 i Riprop Cy ----- '� 42, 5tandard Ri2tpR Cy ----- A5.00 DRATNAOE SCRs 1CTURFS 44. " " Qzh DMiD8 1500.00 12,000 45. T ...._—.. 2000.00 47 M 11500.00 1,500 4 w!D ct 1 25 21500 0 49. Manhole Over Ten Feel EAMA Headwall EA " F1 Fred EA 450.00 4 " , 1 500 • 0 24" MpreEnd EA ----- " --- Sedimentation Structure 1 2000, 21000 0 10, Wide 810 12, 150 12,150 0 Reset M HQ.B. EA ----- 0 SAMT R,Y„SEWER C0hffnhMM " ----- 40.00 " 1,088 38,080 N y ij 362 10,860 S.T. $12,150 0 * varies Page 3. Sub-Total S 79,590.00 I U 1 i 1 4 y U I ,.)U�t' I i I U!1 1 Y 1J.�U I'•. 1 L ✓V'J V-f 14 1 J Q I V 1,J ..r 1 I i _r 1� • _ Bond Bond ' U,lit Reduction Reduction m Description it i N 5ANiTARY SEER STRUCI'IZ= 6 9,000 0 f,,,6. Saxtitarv_Manktol4 1 2,500 0 w EA 2500.f 67 - i t.0 2,000 0 vcrF-A 69, hMUCrtURES & NIISC ITEMS inirt W t LF ----- 71. _Em ___-- >M 22, _Guide Rail -----LF EA Guide Post RA ----- 100.00 Eav=Mt Marking25 1,50 3 37.50 0 SImet 175.00 75 A 75.00 0 RA 1 75 75 75.00 Lights. 21000.00 2,000 0 Z.i'a O 72, , Furnishing 2,456 6, 140 6,140.00 e /pt2.50 DO, Fcrtittzing.Soedln¢ 2,456 6, 140 6, 140.00 5--=g and Mulghing. 2.50 26 15Q.00 3,900 3 900.00' 3,900.00 82, Maintcnanq Trrl1Wjm 1,000 1,000 0 of Traffic LS 21000 21000 0 varies s.T.$16,367.50 * �,9Aa Page 4. Sub-Total S 34,867.50 �UWi''I_ OF :7UUIh Wi1`flj::+UK ill :vr.;ti—Q4 +—,�i - . 130N1) w i irvv%I U,rVAJYL Boad Bond ~ Unit Reduction Roduction n� N 2 , it Prt 30--l— 1 3,000 3,000 3,000 S n mcK,t. 19 2 0 4,750 4,750 4,750 1 , 3.000 zo ,� zvdo �c�a '7 'v w - it 891. S.T. 11,500.0 291 S 3z xv Sub,T "" /.�',�s''otal� Sub-Total Paga 1 9c�, �F'V OD $10,725.00 Sub-Total Pago 2 S 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3 $ 79,590.00 _ 12,150.00 Sub-Total Page 4$,�34,868.00 __ 16,368.00 Sub-Total Page 5 S Sub-Total$ /C ,S' 7/ 25% Contingencies x Sub-Total, �►, 2t0 ' TOTAL S,_ � '*;L6 0' �'�i 8'•�'� Bond Reduction No. 2 Page 1: $10,725.00 Page 2: 6,840.00 * varies Page 3: 0000 Page 4: r, 0; .G0 Pegs 5. Page 5: -5QQM-" 1_2,Z 0 Contingency @ 25%: 9;"B.f•5� Total $ , F . 5 ww--�� 7 1vrNar/80NDE5TMRM1fcxm95 44 4-S'OLlo RSK-KELLEUINC. • Developers ton Road 1744 Ellin • Builders g • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 September 22, 1997 Jerry C. Iazetta, P.E. Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Fieldstone Subdivision Bond Reduction Dear Jerry: Enclosed is a request for a reduction in the Subdivision Bond for the Fieldstone Subdivision. I would appreciate your consideration of this request at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance and please call with any questions or comments. Yours ou� Carol S. Kell RACCnn (SEP FSRED2 2 2 1997 01 m v 6 � We Build Our Reputation SOW N Se4 co k- ci , U 7o-asn o-)g SotdA 7046nd-o6at ti 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 °SO -coy' AREA CODE 860/644-2511 October 17, 1997 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK Kellco Co. Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Kelley: My letter of September 26, 1997 asked that the structures in your subdivision be shimmed properly by October 15, 1997. To date this has not been done. Shimming must be completed properly for the safety of the snowplow drivers and equipment. If this is not completed by October 30, 1997, the Town will be forced to do the work and call part of the subdivision bond to pay for the shimming. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 644-2511, Extension 245. Very truly yours Jer C . ett P. . Toer cc: Melvin C. Stead, Jr, Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Memorandum To: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION From: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Date: 10/14/97 Re: Bond Reductions/Releases Subdivision Bonds Bond Reduction Balance Appl. #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision $ 83,000 $ 35,000 $ 48,000 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planni g FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: October 8, 1997 RE: FIELDSTONE SUBDIVISION We have reviewed the September 27, 1997 request for a bond reduction at the Fieldstone subdivision and recommend that the bond be reduced to $48,000.00. Attached is a copy of the bond estimate for your records. JCl/jsv Attachment - TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PROlECr� Fieldstone STREET: Reritaae Drive BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: __� ENGINEER:B.Kelley 1996 CALENDAR YEAR GATE: 5/19/97 Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction item Descriptionnit -0tiantitV Prim Cost No. I No. Clearingin 1000 CY Strip Suxkgiic 841 1,682 0 Topsoil 2.00 Z E Excavation ------- ----- (Excluding Roadway a Rovidway ExcAyfition CY 1,249 12.00 14 8 0 :4 CY ----- 1 Ea .20/B 12,00 Trench Fe y 'w7� t Earth Trench Exc -20 Y ----- 18,00 Roadway ----- 50.00 10. Rock Trench Exc. 0-4 CY ----- R k Trench Exc, 040 CY ----- 75,00 R k T n Ex -20 CY14, Formation 2,502 J,s 3,753 0 QrAvRl cy 500 10 000 0 I 700 12,600 b 7 c mmon Gravel Borrow ----- y9,w, 1.5 " Bit, Concrete 205 10,250 0 20 �,,,,,1_,5 " Bit. Concrete 1.95, 10,725 10,725 a I1 T55,00 . • S.T. $10,725 $10,725.0 *vucics 90,;,2V-dv Page 1 Sub-Total $-Cr�.• }B-s�0 BOND ESIZMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item DOzKdpfi2O Unit !2�jjmfljX &2hglt LIU Curbing LF 1,860 3.00 5,580 0 22 s WidMigg Cg 21112 139 6,950 6,950 0 (228') 41 Widc LF 1 753 30.00 22,590 6,840 6,840 DRAINAGEUORM Y M CO APONENTS 26, 1127, 47" RCP ----- 28, R p age -- _LF 30, 24" R P ----- 42 .00 31, " RCP Cim In Pin= F 148 35.00 5, 180 0 1'_OLYCG9NE-pipI 34, " Equal —__ 21.00 7 " ADS—ADS-&IZ 2EL4MM 592 15,096 p 1 " AD -N-12 or Eaull 1.78 2,8,go 4,084 4 " JINDERDRA.1NS 39, " PVQ SDR 35 In 1,255 15.00 18,825 0 4 rva5 In Pigoe ----- 20, 0 RIPRAR 41 mEdifind R12CO2 30 1,350 if 0 S.T. $13,790 $6,840 Page 2, Sub-Total S 80,555.00 UI.UI•i Lir _?U0 III UI114 - r ' BOND EMMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Roduction Rods ction an i --l1 No. 2 a i RicCry ----- 't a tandard Ri2taR Cy --"`— AID .DRAINAGE MUCrLMU » » 8 1500.00 12,000 45. T __---- 2000.00 47 M 1 11500 48. Manh2lg wtDrqp jalet 1 2500.00 21 500 0 49. Mianhole Over Ton Pool EA " FIMZd End EA ----- EA 1 500.00 500 0 24" Fi End EA ----- Sedimentation Structure 1 2000, 2,000 0 58, 10' Wide 810 12, 150 12, 150 0 Reset M HQ.B. EA ----- 550.00 �,AK"ARX SEWER COMPOhMM 1 ----- 02, Y I 63, " 1,088 35.09 38,080 §'IkVClnPlX&SPR35 362 3Q.0Q 1.10,860 S.T. $12, 150 0 # yarics Page 3. Sub-Total S 79,590.00 I 11 i 19 )i I 'I I'k. i.. 1 I'I OVIYL yu.0..4. Pond Bond U:lit Reduction Roduction m Description it ice Cost N SAMARY SEWER S-RUCi' = EA 6 9,000 0 & Sanitarv_Manholo 1 2,500 0 w EA 2500.C 1 7. SSe it= Manhole Ycr 12000.0 2,000 0 69, it jRES.&Lmsc, IL 70, 1nirt Wall ----- 71. Em ----- 22. Guide Rail LF 73, Dd Andtora EA � GuidePost 100,00 Egymot Marking_ 25 1.50 37.50 37.50 0 175.OQ 75 75.00 0 27, i 1 75 75 75.00 i 2 1000,00 2,000 0 7-4DO 72, Furnishing 2,45 6, 140 6,1.40.00 IPl150 Fcrtl07.ing. Soeding 2,456 2.50 6, 140 6, 140.00 •� 5—•--5=0 and in EA 26 150.00 3,900 3 900.00 3,900.00 82 Maintan /�rgtcdi� 1,000 1,000 0 of Traffic 2,000 21000 0 S.T.$16,367.50 ' � jades if, Pago 4. Sub-Total S 34,867.50 UbJPJ U� 6UUIN WiIAD60K r B0NU LJ 1 LNU%.S c rVNYL Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction No. 2 ;t-I ChmnlityPr► BA, -$ ii 1.1500 * 1,500 30 1 3,000 3,000 3,000 Iron S 19 2 0 41750 4,750 4,750 n ment. �Od� �4d0 D40 •v w - it 2 3.000 891 IS. 11,500.0 Sub*Total.._. Sub-Total Paga 1 $ 9n, dD $10,7 25.00 Sub-Total Pago 2$ 80,555.00 13,790.00 Sub-Total Page 3 $ 79,590.00 12,150.00 Sub-Total Pago 4 5�34,868.00 16,368.00 Sub-Total Pago 5$ Sub-Total$ 25% ContiOgeocies x Sub-Total: $.,•,' � 2 TOTAL S� Bond Reduction No. 2 Page 1: $10,725.00 Page 2: 6,840.00 varies Page 3: 0000 S Page 4: hr9.24.�0 Page 5. Page 5: 44,SSQr90 I Z i Z. 0 $ s-ee 7/,- Contingency @ 25%: 9_16�6r}'5" Q 4*71 Total $ , } . 5 te..! 1vA11&z 0NDESTFORM/Po AA rm95 `tom 31t MEMORANDUM To: Mel Stead From: Ron Asselin Subject: Shimming Date: November 4, 1997 I've have made a third inspection of streets in new subdivisions in preparation of snow removal for this winter. Unfortunately I haven't any good news to report. And I haven't received any information updating the status of the subdivisions in non-compliance. There haven't been any repairs to the shims on Hitchcock Way by Mannarino Builders as we've requested. I also have a concern of their new subdivision being built on Avery Street just north of Pine Knob Drive. Mannarino is boxing out a new street. There is one house being framed and another has had its foundation poured. Will this area have CO's issued to this area before the winter season ends?You can certainly see that they are working toward having some units built and completed within the next 90 to 120 days. Shims still haven't been installed on Heritage Drive in the Fieldstone subdivision. Having facilities exposed above the paved surface is extremely dangerous to operators and equipment if left unattended. The shims,which have been repaired on Farmbrook Lane as we requested, are poor at best. It looks like the material Lacava used was cold when applied and is showing signs of ravelling which is evident by the aggregate becoming loose from the patches. They also made no attempt to repair the shim around the only sanitary manhole on Scott Drive in that subdivision. I am also concerned about JMJ's development, Deming Hill Estates, has a binder course but no shimming around any facilities on Cardinal Way. It wouldn't surprise me that JMJ starts digging foundations shortly and builds during the winter. I would appreciate any updates on these areas as soon as possible. It has been 40 days since my first memo was issued on this matter. If you don't here something positive about these subdivisions from the Engineering department by November 15, 1997 we should sit down and discuss this with Engineering and the Planning departments to resolve these problems this winter. cc: Mike Gantick Scott Lappen R5K-KELLC111NC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 January 29, 1998 Michelle Lipe, Asst. Planner Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Letter of Credit, Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Michelle: Enclosed is Letter of Credit No. 465 in the amount of $48, 000 with an expiration date of May 30, 1998. This Letter of Credit is intended to amend LC #459 which carried an expiration date of May 30, 1998. I want to make note of the fact that it is Glastonbury Bank's policy to change the number of the LC whenever an amendment is done. If you have any questions, please call me or Dennis Weir, Vice President of Glastonbury Bank, directly. Yours truly, Carol S. Kelle We Build Our Reputation tO*N Se-4( 4 f . .4 U ��� 01 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �f`tOsoe•co AREA CODE 860/644-2511 March 2, 1998 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-KELLCO, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: I had made an insp,pction of Heritage Drive on 2119/98. At this time, I found a number of shims around structures th t were broken and are not to Town standards. The following is a list of items needing to be addressed: Shims around SMH's M 3A& 5A are broken and not acceptable Shims around CB's 2,4, 8 and 11 are broken and not acceptable At sta 2+00 5'L pothole to be repaired In cul-de-sac water gate broken—safety hazard—to be repaired. In order to ensure the safety of the Town snow removal personnel and to ensure timely snow removal on Heritage Drive,these items need to be immediately addressed. You have two options available to you at this time: 1. Repair shims and bring to Town Standards. Cold patch will not be acceptable. Hot patch is available in RI and MA. Roncari has `Perma-Patch' available which will be acceptable. This repair work must be inspected by the Engineering Department. 2. You may provide the Town with a certified letter stating that you will be responsible for all snow removal on Heritage Drive. If you choose this option, you must provide timely and thorough snow removal. Please note that no further permanent certificates of occupancy will be issued until shims are repaired per Subdivision Regulations 4D2c, "No permanent certificate of occupancy will be issued unless a roadway base and binder course of bituminous concrete, constructed in accordance with these regulations, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer." Mr.Bruce Kelley RSK-KELLCO,Inc. March 2, 1998 Page 2. Please respond by March 6, 1998 as to how you will be addressing this issue. You may speak with myself or Jerry Iazzetta at 644-2511, extension 244, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tracy . LaPiene Project Engineer TAP:bmr cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta,Town Engineer Michael J. Gantick,Director of Public Works Melvin C. Stead,Jr., Superintendent of Streets Ronald Asselin, Service Specialist—Street Services F = 4k ♦N �oNry Town of South • • Planning Department Memo To: File From: Marcia A. Banach,AICP, Director of Planning CC: Date: 05/15/98 Re: Lot 7 Fieldstone Subdivision Permission given to have two street trees instead of three planted on Lot 7 (75 Heritage). 0 Page 1 LEGAL SERVICES REQUEST FORM DEPARTMENT: PZC CONTROL # 9 K .-;3 Type of Review Date of Request Date Received Date Date of Review Dispatched 7/22/98 (Check Appropriate Box) Y RECEIVED ❑ Contractual JUL 2a 1998 ❑ Statutory ❑ Regulatory SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. Other (Please specify) Temporary Slope Easement Document Please review the Temporary slope easement being granted to the Town by RSK Kellco to allow for a roadway to be built in the future. If you have any question, please call. 4 Signature: 140.P' 41t * (To be filled in by Town Manager's Office) tpWN Sf4 U 7-0-wn are Sotic� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-co�'� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 June 23, 1998 RSK Kellco Co. Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, Cr 06074 RE: LANDSCAPE BONDS 35, 72 & 75 Heritage Drive Enclosed are three certified checks, each in the amount of$2,500 which we have been holding for the above mentioned lots to ensure landscaping improvements. Now that this work is completed, we are returning these bonds to you. Very truly yours, Jo e . Vallez Engi ring Department Enclosure Received above mentioned bonds Carol Ke ll?/ U 6/23/98 AW\ �. RSK- KELLEDINC. } • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 October 1, 1998 Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: App. No. 96-58P Fieldstone Subdivision, Bond Reduction This is to request that the bonding on the Fieldstone Subdivision be reduced to a maintenance level. All improvements have been completed and the final As Built plan is forthcoming. Please contact me if further information is required. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Yours truly, Bruce S. Kelley Vice President R cEIVED OCT 1 i99& SOUTH „uyM= FsMaint We Build Our Reputation 00 Fuss&O'Neill Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road,Manchester,CT 06040-5921 TEL 86o 646-2469 FAX 86o 643-6313 INTERNET:www.FandO.com Other Offices: Longmeadow,Massachusetts Fairfield,Connecticut East Providence,Rhode Island October 9, 1998 Mr. Jerry Iazzetta Town Engineer Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Record Drawing Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Mr. Iazzetta: This letter is to inform you that the required right-of-way monumentation and property corners have been set. The monumentation was completed by August 27, 1998. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please call me at 860-646-2469. Sincerely, Lawrence R. Geissler, Jr., L.S. Chief of Survey/Associate i !- NAMED OCT 2 2 1998 SOUTH WINOSOR ENG.DEPT. 96284\A1\LRG1009A.WPD /tq Corres. MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engine e DATE: October 27, 1998 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision We have reviewed the request for a bond reduction to maintenance level and acceptance of the infrastructure at the Fieldstone Subdivision. We recommend that this bond be reduced and the infrastructures accepted. There are a few minor items that need to be addressed during the maintenance phase namely: 1. Construction trailer to be removed. 2. Topsoil stockpile to be removed. 3. Open space access area to be topsoiled and seeded. 4. Mylars of As Builts are to be submitted. JCl/sfg Proj.-P&Z Wetlands Appl\Fieldstone\Review Oct 27.doc �py1N Sf4 F Town V/ sloe ?40znd6'0t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR,Co��'v AREA CODE 860/644-2511 r� November 3, 1998 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Rd. South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivison This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 27, 1998 to reduce the subdivision bond from $48,000 to $37,400. This reduces the bond to a maintenance level which will expire on October 27, 1999. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Walter J. Mealy, Vice Chairman WJM/dlw ✓ ����✓fit,;� t '.� �� cc: Town Engineer � Chief Building Official NOV 3 998 SOUTHIOS--OR r T RSK-KELLEDI NC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 October 1, 1998 Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: App. No. 96-58P Fieldstone Subdivision, Bond Reduction This is to request that the bonding on the Fieldstone Subdivision be reduced to a maintenance level. All improvements have been completed and the final As Built plan is forthcoming. Please contact me if further information is required. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Yours truly, Bruce S. Kelley Vice President pxECEIVED OCT 1 199&, SOUTH WINOSO I'J'fif-ma VUL FsMaint We Build Our Reputation SOr1N 8r4 O ' 7-0-Ulon ale Ci • V s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 SOR.co��ly AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 December 14, 1998 Mr. Bruce Kelley i RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Rd. DEC 14 1998 South Windsor, CT 07074 _ e SOUTH WINDSOR ENS.DEPT. Dear Mr.Kelley: Re: Appl#96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 8, 1998 to release the subdivision bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of $5,000. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s) will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION C ,zl u \ Cam) Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/dlw cc: Town Engineer RSK-KELLED I NC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 F- L V November 6, 1998 Nov i 0 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Attention: Michelle RE: Fieldstone Subdivision E & S Bond release Please release the $5, 000 Passbook Savings book you are currently holding as a bond for the Erosion and Sediment control at the Fieldstone subdivision. This project has been completed and the subdivision bond has gone to maintenance for one year. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Yours truly, 136e-la Carol S. Kelley We Build Our Reputation 0le s,ou V&U&Olt y ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �f`Y�soe•co�'�� AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 June 29, 1999 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 75 Heritage Drive (Lot 7 - Fieldstone Subdivision) Dear Mr. Kelley: On June 16, 1999, Mrs. Troiano of 75 Heritage Drive stopped by the Engineering Department in Town Hall and spoke with Mr. Joseph Perna, Project Engineer, about an existing drainage problem on her property. It has come to our attention that a buried clay tile underdrain was encountered during construction of Lot Nos. 6 and 7, and this underdrain was plugged with concrete at the rear of Lot 6 near the property line. According to Mrs. Troiano, this plug has failed as water is discharging from the ground and collecting in the southeast corner of her property directly behind her house. Mr. Perna has twice contacted your office and spoke with Mrs. Carol Kelley about this situation and was assured that the problem would be fixed. We are concerned that another "quick-fix" to this problem is not the solution. Therefore, as Mr. Perna discussed with Mrs. Kelley, we are requesting that a plan be submitted for our review, indicating how this problem will be corrected. We also are to be notified when the work is started, so that an inspection of this work can be conducted. This problem must be corrected prior to release of the maintenance bond for this subdivision. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact either myself or Joe Perna at 644-2511, extension 245. Very truly yours, Je y C. az tta, P. T n Engin er JCI1sfg cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Mel Stead, Supt. of Street Services Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Fieldstone Subdivision File TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR INSPECTION REPORT'f 1j;; PROJECT: - DEVELOPER: STREET: CONTRACTOR: DATE: —SOL(, TIME: WEATHER: INSP: WORK IN PROGRESS: r . N�Z.T wITutl� lH AT itiS ' a,�ufr.�>T oN��tr£ -ram t�lscuss Lb e 't1tl� __m1LzAsQML- sE- 15E TA{Cf� Ql1c�AR1>i�Gc 'tL(� �ci6StAR_�,AC� yP_a1,.yAc�1� -r1taT i� c Us( '� S aT -rlklS AMU S-N Rwd is �� L.,,cArr-- -MC ISW TPL '%6 g_W!g - cwiL CA►>S:) Df-AO LI' x zWi-Sp Li A, AfetLvD i1JF- SACL --IF 79E Ic,a L a"o rewiP.C-To-A i— -rkk- CATC-4 &Aila GJs�,'7� I,J -rW1- Gt.1=-Drz.-SAS e,t�T FFoti ti p iy=eLmsi , LAU —6E (N"fa c-cis-r►;<qi p2Aizs Qjj& AT-Tut- Fick cF ?u£ CATCH BAD, wrftl A ►-y— '-l- , rAC;T" ,;rs jtiEN 'ME wo9k fs „�DE(- ) kA r b.J6- C&AN `AJ Spt,-,Z' -rWf t o/v�/f�Tl�,•'S e ,1dF lS At�/A&& —MAT WE- NMD-� 10 _ �/aCJL oyT A S T K. '1' S,- CAVAYlon1 M1 t lei) PKASA�(.N CALT �r ni, S.ATFk i a Putt 79 �^►'� bUT" Do TIDE-. i.,/op-AIL IdIMSE.I.�� r �c�2►NG E+art I�tsct�Sst�a i- S&CAn4- AwAU "TIIAe-rb1E. coAkm4p o LoT U.jr AREA OF CONCERN: wA5 ��uA-6 *6 w�EJzN L,r 1Js�S. Z A% A I_AAiO Sw8a - c4AS e,^.-,rXWD AQool- -Mrz �CATy�J � r 1t£ a yL►*i�, , , C�Pa..1 fy RTtdE(C. �r 1 J�sT1GA i IoJ� y� y� gQP€AK-J My F;�Ss ,�f t�'NtILL, F-24- T'uf- Lao-20 SwAO WA-S _. Nf y6a- --T Il)rs'1 70f TWE FiaD J1jTk `j/f-1ZiJA) CIW,Q 61f*1CO, M,-T qAut- i U 17UX,7- NAAIL 5, 11 IS hrn T r-/CAf> 6y s'7Aft i AMA4.� .5u8D1U13t.-",� .s wfTu vim(( , t CIOE A�7 �CArA� S An�>✓C_ cAI(.np gttGf- We L A..Y> %oGtA3Trc> iUAr T0 11Ayr Fc)S f A-0 (DMA-*J CMX A A&W MAP f-4- FfL►,j& ,,,A It S-rKUkT "And AA19 L.AuD Swgp (�*P*4,tp , ld� Ply n>>r -a-o0Nr-t rlMWDk;t Ar>,v r -AAT - W-6 TV- n cATTWL I o NLIcJI > SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 64+-44-50 (4) (� 43� COD -own Ole SOUL/, ?d&&'40t 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074 2786 SOR.Co�'` AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 July 26, 1999 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Rd. South Windsor, CT 07074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Ap #96-S8P, fieldstone Subdivision At the July 13, 1999 special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the existing stockpile in the area of the road stub in the above referenced subdivision. It is our understanding that the Town staff has requested several times that this stockpile be q kp removed. It was the consensus of the Commission to inform you that if the stockpile was not removed, and the area re-graded and seeded by September 26, 1999 (one month prior to the expiration of the maintenance bond), the Commission will vote to extend the maintenance bond for an additional six months. If you have any questions,please contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 253. Very truly yours, PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION �� C� Sue Larsen, Chair ' SL/mrl cc: Town Engineer Town Manager R5K-KELLE0INC. • Developers 1744 Ellington Road • Builders g • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 " F x4-5650 September 10, 1999 Sue Larsen, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074-2786 RE: APPL. #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision/7/26/99 Dear Ms. Larsen: This is to notify you that as of Tuesday, September 7, 1999, the stockpile referred to in your letter of July 26, 1999, has been removed and the area seeded. Yours �truly, Carol S. Kelley Y Secretary cc Town Engineer Town Manager Town Planner Wsttopsoil We Build Our Reputation M' �tOwN Sfq( 'N `awn OP South ?&U� y G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 e•co AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 October 20, 1999 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Mr. Kelley: The maintenance bond for the Fieldstone Subdivision is scheduled to expire on October 27, 1999. As discussed with Mr. Joseph Perna, Project Engineer, there are still some outstanding items that need to be completed before this bond expires. Listed below are the items that must be addressed by October 26, 1999: 1. There is a drainage problem that still exists in the back yard of 75 Heritage Drive. A yard drain was installed that appears to be collecting surface runoff but the ground is still saturated from subsurface flow. 2. A revised as-built plan was never submitted for 75 Heritage Drive (Lot 7). A Certificate of Occupancy was issued back in March of 1998 but final grading and seeding was not complete at that time (a bond was submitted but subsequently released). 3. There is a cracked panel in the concrete sidewalk just west of the entrance drive to lot no. 1 which must be replaced. 4. The two manholes on the cross-country sanitary sewer line must be equipped with watertight frames and covers (see attached detail). This specification is stated in the approval letter from the Town of South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority. 5. The rip-rap energy dissipater at the end of the storm drainage outfall has accumulated silt — this should be cleaned out. Page Two Mr. Bruce Kelley October 20, 1999 6. A new mylar should be filed with the street name and the land swap between lot nos. 7 and 8 added. Apparently, Fuss &O'Neill created a 8- 1/2"by 11"plan of the land swap but that size is not acceptable for filing in the Town Clerk's Office. n as-built plan prepared by Fuss &O'Neill 7. A mylar copy of the subdivisio must be submitted. If these are not completed by noon on October 26, 1999 me at month h4-251sion of this bond will be required. If you have any questions, please extension 245. Very truly yours Jer C. Ia etta, . . T n eer JCl/sfg cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer File MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer (� FROM: Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Y' , DATE: October 20, 1999 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision At your request, I have completed a site inspection of this subdivision to determine remaining work to be completed before release of the maintenance bond. The following items need to be addressed: • There is a drainage problem that still exists in the back yard of 75 Heritage drive. A yard drain was installed that appears to be collecting surface runoff but the ground is still saturated from subsurface flow. I suggest that we meet with Bruce Kelley on- site to look at the problem. • A revised as-built plan was never submitted for 75 Heritage Drive (Lot 7). A Certificate of Occupancy was issued back in March of 1998 but final grading and seeding was not complete at that time (A bond was submitted but subsequently released). • There is a cracked panel in the concrete sidewalk just west of the entrance drive to lot no. 1 which must be repaired. • The two manholes on the cross-country sanitary sewer line must be equipped with watertight frames and covers (see attached detail). This specification is stated in the approval letter from The Town of South Windsor Water Pollution Control Authority. • The rip-rap energy dissipater at the end of the storm drainage outfall has accumulated silt— this should be cleaned out. • A new mylar should be filed with the street name and the land swap between lot nos. 7 And 8 added. Apparently, Fuss & O'neill created a 8 1/2" by 11" plan of the land swap but that size is not acceptable for filing in the Town Clerk's office. • A mylar copy of the subdivision as-built plan prepared by Fuss & O'neill must be submitted. SITE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST TOWN of SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUppT 75 HERITAGE DRIVE LOT_# 7 Reviewed B (En ineering) RSK-KELLCO, INC. Date Reviewed 48 roved vied 1744 ELLINGTON ROAD,SOUTH WINDSOR,CT_ Reviewed By --(P ing) BP_#_24812 Ph_#_(203)644-8761 Date Reviewe 4' Approve enied Date Submitted 04/03/98 ***** FOR of 0 ** As required in the Zoning and/or Subdivison Regulations, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until grading plans have been complied with and approved by the Town Engineer. The minimum requirements shall include: Approved Denied N/A 1. Approved building permit plan 2. Finish grading per approved building permit plan t.99M►N t=iee.r;- 3. Site work; i.e. trees, shrubs, dumpsters, required parking Delve,,, QAv" ? 4. Utility location; 1 a. sanitary sewer/septic system b. foundation drain C. electrical & telephone d. water ,f e. other 1! 5. Sewer connection charge paid J'4626 6. Appropriate certification 7. Bonding 8. Planning & Zoning/ Inland Wetlands Considerations Sewer Permit No. 6_7 63 Pavement Excavation No. COMMENTS: fn>-I-, ( AVr rs �in1a�. �eAa„vG• ,JoT cr�MgULT� Ap�n1G�r 'fppSctG f' F .K� N� DgAy CTDel" S�&wt-I w,l� J /� tRFi4� r.lt°N CRVi�v+6 r ((!!.►ilk—' RSK-KELLEUINC. • Developers ton Road 1744 Ellin • Builders g • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 Fax: 860-644-5650 4 5 e October 22, 1999 e REcEivEO 4CT 2 2 1999 SOMSM 4b erc.oEPr. Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E. Town Engineer 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision Regarding your letter dated October 20, 1999: Item 2. You are correct. As many times as we have posted bonds for the completion of landscaping we have never submitted a revised As Built drawing nor has it been requested. The bond was released upon inspection and approval by your department. Item 6. The mylar has been filed as of today showing the land swap between lots number 7 and 8. Fuss & O'Neill created a 12 ' x 18 ' mylar on September 28, 1998 . If you have something that is 8 1/2" x 11" it was obviously reduced by someone--probably for faxing purposes. The final documents between the parties and their lenders were just delivered to me by the principles involved this week. Retrospect and several thousand dollars tells me that we should have simply reduced the size of the driveway and put an end to this situation more than a year ago. Item 7. A mylar of the subdivision improvements was submitted back in October of 1998. I requested that Fuss & O'Neill prepare a second mylar which I am again submitting with this letter. You s ,truly,, C / Cx� !l Carol S. Kelley U ` Secretary We Build Our Reputation '4` "'AlF RSK-KELLEIIINC. • Developers • Builders 1744 Ellington Road • Property South Windsor, CT 06074 Managers Tel: 860-644-8761 /644-8140 44-5650 October 25, 1999 RECEIVED OCT 2 5 igg9 w SOU Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E. ENG.DEPr Town Engineer -c� 1540 Sullivan Avenue l bj , ,s South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision Further regarding your letter dated October 20, 1999: Item 1: The problem at 75 Heritage Drive was resolved when the grading and seeding was completed after the drain was installed. None of our approval letters references this item in any way. This is an item that will be addressed between the builder and the buyer and is not part of any subdivision bond. Item 2: Addressed in letter dated October 22 , 1999. Item 3 : The cracked sidewalk panel was removed today and will be replaced Tuesday, October 26, 1999 . Item 4: This item was completed by J & H Slater Monday, October 25, 1999. Item 5: The dissipater was cleaned Monday, October 25, 1999. Item 6: Addressed in letter dated October 22 , 1999. Item 7: Addressed in letter dated October 22 , 1999. Yours truly, (?aa-a,, , Carol S. Kelle Secretary cc Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer c/IAZFSBNDREL We Build Our Reputation SOwM af'1 - �i •• u -own oles-otA � m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE-SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074.2786 OR.CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 November 10, 1999 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Rd. South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Kelley: Re: Appl #96-58P, Fieldstone Subdivision This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on October 26, 1999 to release the maintenance bond and to require a $5,000 subdivision bond to cover the remaining work. Sincerely, Sue W. Larsen, Chairperson Planning and Zoning Commission cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer MEMORANDUM TO: Michele Lipe, Ass't Director of Planning FROM: Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer DATE: October 26, 1999 RE: Fieldstone Subdivision The following is a brief chronology of events regarding the drainage problem at 75 Heritage Drive: • A C. of 0. was issued on 4/14/98 with a $2500 bond posted to cover grading, landscaping and driveway construction. • The landscape bond was released on June 23, 1998. At this point, the engineering department was not aware of a drainage problem. • The Engineering Department received a call from the current property owners, Dan and Paula Troiano on June 16,1999 regarding a drainage problem in their back yard. Upon inspection of the property, there appeared to be a problem with sub-surface drainage at the rear of the property about 15 to 20 feet away from the back of the house. • RSK was contacted on two occasions 6/16/99 and 6/28/99 regarding this issue. A follow-up letter was sent on June 29, 1999 which is self explanatory (see attached). • I met with Bruce Kelley on July 9, 1999 on-site to look at the situation. His plan was to locate the end of the clay tile and connect a new drain line and yard drain to the storm drainage system out in the street. • On October 20, 1999, I conducted another inspection of the area as the maintenance bond for the subdivision was due to expire. The yard drain was installed but there was still evidence of sub-surface drainage as the lawn area was wet and soggy. RSK is aware of the situation and Bruce said that he will fix the situation but they do not want to hold up the release of the maintenance bond. Cc: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer Town ale ISOU& ?d1,k&0t y G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•co AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 June 29, 1999 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 75 Heritage Drive (Lot 7— Fieldstone Subdivision) Dear Mr. Kelley: On June 16, 1999, Mrs. Troiano of 75 Heritage Drive stopped by the Engineering Department in Town Hall and spoke with Mr. Joseph Perna, Project Engineer, about an existing drainage problem on her property. It has come to our attention that a buried clay tile underdrain was encountered during construction of Lot Nos. 6 and 7, and this underdrain was plugged with concrete at the rear of Lot 6 near the property line. According to Mrs. Troiano, this plug has failed as water is discharging from the ground and collecting in the southeast corner of her property directly behind her house. Mr. Perna has twice contacted your office and spoke with Mrs. Carol Kelley about this situation and was assured that the problem would be fixed. We are concerned that another "quick-fix" to this problem is not the solution. Therefore, as Mr. Perna discussed with Mrs. Kelley, we are requesting that a plan be submitted for our review, indicating how this problem will be corrected. We also are to be notified when the work is started, so that an inspection of this work can be conducted. This problem must be corrected prior to release of the maintenance bond for this subdivision. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact either myself or Joe Perna at 644-2511, extension 245. In uly yours, . tta, P. ngin r JCl/sfg cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Mel Stead, Supt. of Street Services Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Fieldstone Subdivision File MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Date: October 26, 1999 Re: Fieldstone Subdivision The maintenance bond for the Fieldstone Subdivision is due to expire October 271 1999, however there are still some outstanding punch list items. Therefore we recommend that the maintenance bond be extended 3 months or until these items are completed. JCl/sfg S:\ENGINEER\Proj.-P&z Wetland Applications\Fieldstone\Bond Oct 26.doc ,5(-Op MEMORANDUM To: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning From: Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Date: October 26, 1999 Re: Fieldstone Subdivision The maintenance bond for the Fieldstone Subdivision is due to expire on October 27, 1999, however there is a drainage problem that still exists at 75 Heritage Drive (Lot 7). We therefore recommend that the maintenance bond be extended 3 months or a separate $5,000.00 bond be posted until this problem can be corrected. JJP/sfg EER\Proj.-P&Z Wedand Applicauun5TIRRIammaintenance Bond.doc TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: DEVELOPER: SZSK _ STREET: CONTRACTOR: DATE: �rcG� t 4 zcvo TIME. ' 4 S WEATHER: NNc� Co INSP: WORK IN PROGRESS: Fo IIow1-- �N�P -tfoa sap' �R�+�N�aCt�c-�n� ATfL N�vs�: AT.:aaLL Q-iQyK&r a!f- -; ice 6�oMEoueN�—Me,s. �oyLla RQian,c oB SRv b ;ti� l'o�u c�1'Tlal� a� '-t1 tF� f "g- 4Agi� SGaIC�L AAcg 3 AFT A TcXZ n� gy&,, ' C akAvy q P-/ l zs oGw G'il�fL ;Ld� tn/f}t N� of �a 1 it ANO '3��z.'on] a IlAf A9XA 0 UXSTl" AT `TNSS iimr, 1S. 5-TI0 Vr=Ejj WV-T A► f> 5-(-vf- ANT--., -TIS� AMA l�F�vNr3 i►If c-1AR1� t>Raola 1� ��ovFl� tWh- yAR> Dg-% s� cal Ti�c� -5Q -Fm--L� wt,7lF (L- Mir;> AS TIJE otif (W'L ATE Asja "TWA Ab was wi,�G Ga�C7 J A1.5� �vn;► ' I-AAi Tuf, ConJ�Jf�T1 JCn is TWC- C-ATlr k $AS)� a S�z.TT � I R Fi�l� Fad i 1( P G A'� AT Mr,5 iPara��s fZ�tv��T� wt wi t t c O-F nQD cfs;rzyrc- -ref- AUA� AREA OF CONCERN: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: DEVELOPER: STREET: CONTRACTOR: �-�Elzi�ra��, l�iy� �,�K• K�tl�ct DATE: Af?GK Z�y7.ee'J TIME: 1 e co WEATHER: - ?-A►a INSP: Q RNA WORK IN PROGRESS: SPF.CTto� N of V9,a►tjAG- 'X t� AT �+f;. oP (�L« t�uR►��G STofzm AT Y'WOk-s`C e - •iM- koN—"Eea o (a ttaf�llED PPGt,{UR�/.� c�►iiiG)( �L �(J�f�T "7!!f; U� 1TIo��C ►n� -rtjf— "Ag- �,/p� �c�►uCa �p STn� E1/EN'T NS DfsSGQIfS�� 11� Any f,J�,T1oA ��.�'R-� o�J 6 4-J car 'i 11Esf r��x��rf�,zs �r , �h. o►ui y szic.uT[�./ r,v&j ss vs"L- Ate- - A saw cal T o As WEE- s -r;4f✓ AMA 5ULA4S -F& TV. coil c.7;,.�Ca g-:Ttk Ic a« ANo �c��srXtF� QuN�f� �t+u5 CAUS�+�G ;fJri So<s[s�l c T C.�vor"ioJS , 10 InNa►J 15 (fJJK nn V 6+mt�STR-ULTf Li i1tilDEP.DQAIn►S _ V ACAO is S-j'1,AJC 11 14P -r0---r-a LS WAK;j c„e+Xla -71ry ►N-O TWC jdAet-J VEAIra ev PA.T-rs" . IN►�. A(o-ck wrrA az--Q"1>,M6 AP, m/>- TU b W-AHO •Ty i,,,uvfo cotuu7Yoa of* (dfkf? Su'r Fg"6CS A-F ImE 66j;T% e- Lj(Tkl 41-S EA)41-E io Comb UP WiTk YWWIt ow^) IDEAS „ AREA OF CONCERN: �a��w y(7 � C��� Ar�� (,E.f� A MEsSSAC� w1TN Tub tlw�,F2 T� fJ4�r 11E�- (�, a CAICx+-> KA(A- wfJ-10 - ,,As to ISuT ()EPT A A4,Z4-A&L •-•rWAT s11E ►✓AS-- _ L klUa kR- s t�tRl ,T��a As '-r- 41w Suli- CAQ 617V .s1n4. W 4-'AASL �P<rAk-`fa c pf SfO� AM �F CiyR•sE AVAIL03R(.f; -T, A^ SLJC-i? ,NJy TciR-�{lf��. faAfD1ACG '-IUVS MATTE. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ?AuLA'UZmI AKL,:;, oo 0/U 644 44�a -1-L6 s +'Kc e) C w-(*- y&PT4 �sowa af,t� Fs� �• C � G! 9 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-CO AREA CODE 860/644-2511 April 24, 2000 Mr. Bruce Kelley RSK-Kellco, Inc. 1744 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: 75 Heritage Drive Lot 7, Fieldstone Subdivision Dear Mr. Kelley: At the homeowners request we have made a recent inspection of the rear yard at 75 Heritage Drive. The inspection has found that the problem of water in the yard still exists and that the measures taken last year have not been effective. It is our understanding that the homeowners have tried unsuccessfully to contact you concerning this problem. Also Mr. Joseph Perna, Project Engineer has called several times and left messages about this problem. To date we have not received a reply from you or your office concerning this issue. When this problem first was brought to the Town's attention, the Fieldstone Subdivision maintenance bond was still in effect. As this problem was the only outstanding issue in the subdivision, the Town agreed to receiving a $5,000 bond to address this problem so that the subdivision maintenance bond could be released. This $5,000 bond is still in place and will not be released until this problem is satisfactorily resolved. It is recommended that you have your engineer evaluate the situation, propose a solution and forward it to this office for our review before any other repairs are started. It is felt that an appropriate date for the completion of any remedial measures would be June 1, 2000 so that the homeowner can utilize their backyard this summer. As you know this has been a long standing problem and we would like to bring it quickly to a successful conclusion. Please advise as to your schedule for addressing this issue. Ve truly yours, Jer . Iazz , P.E. T n En JCl/sfg cc: Mr. and Mrs. Dan Troiano Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer Fieldstone Subdivision File From: Tracy LaPiene To: Melvin Stead Subject: Pierce Rd Maintenance Concern I received a complaint from Mr. Bill Mangino Sr 644-9708 at 272 Pierce Rd concerning water coming from a sanitary manhole on Pierce Rd. I spoke with Bob Lugi and he said that the resident had called in previously an after hours emergency reporting a sanitary blockage. Pollution pulled the cover and found that this was not sanitary water. Upon inspection I believe that this water is groundwater running along the stone and pipe from Heritage Drive to Pierce Road were it no longer has free draining material to flow through and then the head causes this groundwater to breakout at the surface and thus run into the roadway. I would reccommend that the shoulder area be built up a couple inches between the manhole and edge of pavement to direct the groundwater toward the wetlands. An alternative may be to replace some of the existing material to the west of the manhole with stone or other free draining material and allow the groundwater to follow that and break out along the wetland bank. If this is not addressed this season it may cause an icing problem for us during this winter. If you need any further information or assistance with this please give Jerry or myself a call. Trace CC: Jorry |ozzetto ,t0w14 SC44 .1 T-O-U'Oft �.// S-V U& ?0 � 6 ` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ���osoe•co� AREA CODE 860 / 644-2511 September 8, 2000 Ref: Surface water runoff Mr. William O'Brien 294 Pierce Rd South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. O'Brien, While responding to a call from Mr. Mangino of 292 Pierce Road,you informed me of a concern you have regarding stormwater from the rear of your property. During my inspection of your property we discussed a possible remedy to the situation, namely creating a small swale along your rear property line to intercept any surface water runoff and direct that across to Mr. Mangino's Swale. Since you would then be directing water onto adjacent property you should seek a right to drain easement from Mr. Mangino to ensure that your property will have rights to direct surface water across his property in the future should any property transfers occur. If you need any clarification or have any questions regarding this please contact the Town Engineer,Jerry C. Iazzetta at(860) 644-2511 ext. 245. Very truly yours, Mr. Tracy A. LaPiene Project Engineer tal / cc: ./ Jerry C. lazzetta,Town Engineer S:\ENGINEER\LAPIEN\Complaints\294 Pierce Rd Complaint 08310o.doc 151: I OwN 8f8 ' Y T11WZ-An O-P _ T)0&2� G � 9 G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 •c AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 September 8, 2000 Ref Surface water runoff Mr.William Mangino Sr. 292 Pierce Rd South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Mangino, In response to your concern about water coming from around the sanitary manhole across the street, it was determined that it is probably groundwater breaking out at the sanitary manhole. This has been forwarded to the Town Street Services Department to be addressed. During my inspection of your concern,your neighbor of 294 Pierce Road expressed his concern about stormwater in his rear yard. A possible remedy to the situation was discussed,namely creating a small swale along Mr. O'Brien's rear-property line to intercept any surface water runoff and direct that across to your swale. Since he would then be directing water onto your property he should seek a right to drain easement from you to ensure that his property will have rights to direct surface water across your property in the future should any property transfers occur. If you need any clarification or have any questions regarding this please contact the Town Engineer,Jerry C. Iazzetta at(860) 644-2511 ext. 245. Very truly yours, Mr. Tracy A. LaPiene Project Engineer tal cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta,Town Engineer Melvin Stead, Director of Street Services S:\ENGINEER\I.APIEMComplaints\292 Pierce Rd Complaint 083100.doc ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the 0 ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an m ■Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. d ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): ai card to you. ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address Lpermit. d ■Write'Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery to r ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Consult postmaster for fee. ° c delivered. 0 4a.Article Number 3.Article Addressed to: p 259 184 944 M E o. BRUCE KELLEY 4b.Service Type d 0 RSK—KELLCO, INC. ❑ Registered Certified N 1744 ELLINGTON ROAD ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured 0 W SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD G 7.Date of livery o a � � Z Y v P'nm ) 8.Addressee's A dre s(Only if requested 5.Recei 5,f- y' ( t Na and fee is paid) W R 6.Sign r :(Addy s a. r A nt) 00 X 2 PS Form 3811, De. m er 1 4 Domestic Return Receipt I also wish to serviceslve the (fo an m SENDER: following p ,complete items 1 �and 4b,additional services. extra fee): ,e ■Complete items 3,4a, ❑ Addressee's Address d print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that ace doesan tnot urn this 1 0 card to you• lace,or on the back if space 0 Attach this form to the front of the mailp' 2.13 Restricted Delivery a d permit. t Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. Consult postmaster for fee. ■Write"Return Raceip q The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the da e 4a.Article Number c delivered. p 259 184 936 o r � 3.Article Addressed to: d 4b.Service Type > Certified or BRUCE KELLEY ❑ Registered ❑ Insured a 0 RSK—KELLCO, INC. ❑ Express Mail i t for Merchandise ❑ COD c 17 44 ELLINGTON ROAD 4 [3 Return Race p 3 W SOUTH WINDSOR CT 7.Da f alive T 0 a 8.Address e s Addr ss Only if requested z rint Name) and fee s paid) 5.Received By:(P W 6.Signat e:( ddresse o A ent) c X Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 38119 December 1994 VOI. 1022PAGE � TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT +5 7 1. KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that RSK - KELLCO, INC., a Connecticut corporation with offices in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as ""GRANTOR" for One Dollar and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as "'GRANTEE", do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, a Temporary Slope Easement on land located in the. Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut as more fully described herein. The land affected by said easement is more particularly bounded and described as follows: A strip of land along the westerly border of Lot No. 5 which is also the easterly boundary of a future road, as shown as "20' TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT FOR FUTURE ROAD CONSTRUCTION" on a map or plan entitled, "'RSK-Kellco, Inc. Plot Plan Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT Scale: 1" = 40' Job No. 96-284A1 Date 08/14/96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Revision date: 9-6-96 9- 30-96, Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut" which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office of said Town of South Windsor to which further reference may be made. The Grantee has the right to enter on said land for the purpose of grading and road construction. The Grantee agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to restore any disturbed land within said easement area to as nearly its present condition as possible commensurate with the above-provided use of the land and to similarly restore the land at any time that it is necessary to disturb the surface thereof in connection with repairing or replacing of the road or easement area. The Grantors reserve for itself, its successors and assigns, the right to continue to use the land within the easement area for any uses and purposes which do not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purposes for which this right is granted. r VOL. 10 2 2 PAGE 192 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal this Qeday of July, 1998. Signed and Delivered in the presence of(Type or Print name below each signature. ) WITNESSES: GRANTOR: RS LLCO, INC. �f ey y: Richar S. Kelley, P71 dent 1 puce S,Ke l/ey STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss South Windsor July a $ , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK - KELLCO, INC., as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be �4ct and deed as such President and the free act and deed of said corporation, t/tvota ublic My Commission Expires: lCrI3110 ro TOWN HALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer: Date Approved by Town : i n ct ToW;� OLL, `1 � Date Received for Record: JUL 28 1998 a-f- G 5 i✓}m Date/Time Vol./Page UuL Tow Clerk •TOWN CLERK VOi. 10 2 2 PAGE 19 3 TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT 4 5 7 Z KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that RSK - KELLCO, INC., a Connecticut corporation with offices in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR" for One Dollar and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE", do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, a Temporary Slope Easement on land located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut as more fully described herein. The land affected by said easement is more particularly bounded and described as follows: A strip of land along the easterly border of Lot No. 6 which is also the westerly boundary of a future road, as shown as "20' TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT FOR FUTURE ROAD CONSTRUCTION" on a map or plan entitled, "RSK-Kellco, Inc. Plot Plan Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT Scale: 1" = 40' job No. 96-284A1 Date 08/14/96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Revision date: 9-6-96 9- 30-96, Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office of said Town of South Windsor to which further reference may be made. The Grantee has the right to enter on said land for the purpose of grading and road construction. The Grantee agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to restore any disturbed land within said easement area to as nearly its present condition as possible commensurate with the above-provided use of the land and to similarly restore the land at any time that it is necessary to disturb the surface thereof in connection with repairing or replacing of the road or easement area. The Grantors reserve for itself, its successors and assigns, the right to continue to use the land within the easement area for any uses and purposes which do not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purposes for which this right is granted. VOI. 1. ® 22PAGE 194 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal this , day of July, 1998. Signed and Delivered in the presence of(Type or Print name below each signature. ) WITNESSES: GRANTOR: RSK- LLCO, INC. ( ml S.k'e/ley UBy: Richar Ke ley, P esident Bruce, S"I"elrey STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss South Windsor July ;2 3 , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK - KELLCO, INC., as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act;and:deed as such President and the free act and deed of said corporation, befo mom, 4, 4% "•. otary P bh My Commission Expires:iolkl,X c>A fir, 7) To 14ALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer: — U 7��f98 Date Approved by Town der: �I eltc_. Date Received for Record: JUL 2 8 1998 Date/Time Vol./Page jr Town C k - *TOWN CLERK VOL. NAGE SEWER LINE AND DRAINAGE E - JUL 2?Ol 944 x KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that` K - KEbQ01 Connecticut corporation with offices in the Town of Sout' jndsor, Co Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as or ne V Dollar and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfac i IT of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE", do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns the perpetual right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use, alter, repair, replace and remove a storm water or storm drainage systems, sanitary sewers and appurtenances thereto, in through, upon and over certain piece(s) or parcels of land as described in Exhibit A. Within said parcel(s) described in Exhibit A, the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees and bushes as may be convenient or necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with people and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction of storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm drainage systems and sanitary sewers and to excavate and fill, and, if necessary, to alter existing water courses or form embankments over said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm sewer drainage systems and sanitary sewers. The GRANTOR herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures on said easements or rights-of-way and shall not plant or allow to be planted or grown any trees thereon or perform any work thereon within said easements or rights-or-way which may endanger or interfere with said line, pipe or drainage systems. The GRANTOR herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to itself, its successors and assigns, to continue to use the land within which the aforesaid easements or rights-of-way have been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purpose for which these easements or rights- of-way are granted. The GRANTEE herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to restore and maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use upon the completion of any maintenance, operation, construction, replacement or repair work in said easement or right-of- way areas. The GRANTEE agrees to hold the GRANTOR, its successors and assi n COWEYANCE TAX STATE S ....... _LOCAL$ ....--•w )C cjltaot to t of soutN ww" VOL. 101 PAGE 159 Exhibit A That certain piece or parcel of land with the buildings and improvements thereon situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, shown as "'SANITARY AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT TO BE DEEDED TO THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR FROM RSK-KELLCO, INC. AREA 12,766 SQ.FT." on a map or plan entitled, "RSK-Kellco, Inc. Plot Plan Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT Scale: 1" = 40' Job No. 96-284A1 Date 08/14/96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Revision date: 9-6-96 9-30-96, Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut" which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office of said Town of South Windsor to which further reference may be made. Said Easement being more particularly described and bounded as follows: Beginning at a point on the westerly side of the cul-de-sac at Heritage Drive; thence N58°46'45"W a distance of fifty-eight and sixty-two one hundredth feet (58.62 ); thence S33°44'41"W a distance of one hundred thirty and no one hundredths feet (130.00'); thence S11°07'44"E a distance of seventy-four and ten one hundredths feet (74.10'); thence N78°54'58"W a distance of one hundred and no one hundredths feet (100.00'); thence N33°44'41"E a distance of two hundred sixty-nine and thirty one hundredths feet (269.30'); thence S58°46'45"E a distance of ninety-six and thirty-four one hundredths feet (96.34'); thence in a southerly direction along a curve with a radius of fifty-five and no one hundredths feet (55.00') an angle of 54°04°17' and a distance of fifty-one and ninety-one one hundredths feet (51.91') to a point and place of beginning. harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the construction and/or maintenance and repair of said drainage system and sewer line. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal this 49*day of June, 1998. Signed and Delivered in the presence of(Type or Print name below each signature. ) WITNESSES: GRANTOR: RSK- LCO,INC. 0-1 / '* J By: chard . Kelley, Prtcllsident ,e�rj.�sAx9 N1. �'vv s,r,.t STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss South Windsor June c , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK - KELLCO, INC., as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to,be his free act and deed as such President and the free act and deed of said corporafriQj�,, before me. 1 a � w My Commission Expires: w r r TOWN HALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer: Date Approved by Town Manager: 7 Date Received for Record: Date/Time RECEIVED FOR RECORD ` 19 c{� AT ) 1',13 p a Vol./Page RECORDED IN SOUTH WINDSOR LAND RECORDS VOLIO' S2_PAGE_L� By L..TOTN CLER Town Clerk 55t� VOL. 1016 PAGE y STREET TREE EASEMENT ,J U L ? 031 ,115�F) This Street Tree Easement made this a,776h day of June, 1998,by and between RSK - KELLCO, INC., a Connecticut corporation with offices in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "GRANTOR" and the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, hereinafter called "'GRANTEE". WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is the owner of real property, hereinafter described, situated on Heritage Drive in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that it would be in the public interest to retain a Street Tree Easement on a portion of the premises of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agencies, has determined that the landscaping of said property can best be accomplished by the securing by the GRANTEE of a Street Tree Easement over, across and upon the said property of the GRANTOR; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR is willing, in consideration of the need to provide for the Street Tree Easement, to grant the said GRANTEE, the easement hereinafter expressed concerning said property, thereby providing for the continuation of said premises as a Street Tree Easement; and WHEREAS, the GRANTOR intends to convey the property described herein to certain purchasers subject to this Street Tree Easement and by granting said Street Tree Easement to the GRANTEE shall not change the character of private ownership of said property and the public shall have no right to enter upon same. NOW, THEREFORE, the said GRANTOR does hereby give, grant, bargain and confirm unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever the right, privilege and authority as a Street Tree Easement and restriction, to plant and perpetually preserve, street trees in their present condition a tree belt along the streets as shown as "'20' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT" on a map entitled "RSK-Kellco, Inc. Plot Plan Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT Scale: 1" = 40' Job No. 96-284A1 Date 08/14/96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Revision date: 9-6-96 9- 30-96, Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut" which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office of said Town of South Windsor to which further reference may be made. THE GRANTOR FURTHER COVENANTS AND AGREES: 1. To maintain said tree belt; and 2. To prohibit and refrain from the following operations, unless prior written consent is obtained from the GRANTEE, acting through its appropriate municipal agency or successor, on the premises conveyed herein: a. the construction or placing of buildings, structures, roads, signs or fence; b. the dumping or placing of soil, leaves and yard wastes, etc., or other substances or materials as landfill or dumping or placing of trash, CONVEYANCE TAX RECENEO STATE Q�,S L�tOCA�L,$n- No ckolc TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR VOL. 1016PAGE ashes, waste, rubbish, junk, garbage or unsightly or offensive materials; C. the excavation, dredging or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other mineral substance; d. the removal or destruction of street trees. The GRANTOR reserves unto itself, its heirs, successors, and assigns the right to continue to use the property subject to said Street Tree Easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the terms hereof. The grant of the Street Tree Easement shall in no way grant anyone other than the parties hereto the right to enter upon the property subject to the easement. The GRANTEE, or its lawful agents, may enter the property for the purpose of inspection and ensuring that the terms hereof are properly enforced. The foregoing Street Tree Easement shall be permanent and shall be binding upon the GRANTOR and its heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights, privileges or authority unto the said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RSK - KELLCO, INC. has caused these presents to be signed by its proper corporate officer and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this A17 121 day of June, 1.998. Signed and Delivered in the presence of(Type or Print name below each signature. ) WITNESSES: GRAN OR: RS - LLCO,IN . —0,"", A,�'l/-,� G� By: Richard S. Kelley,kesident ,"'XFO� STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss South Windsor June q , 1998 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK - KELLCO, INC.;,;..,, 7° as aforesaid, signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same tp,,Ee " his free act and deed as such President and the free act and deed of said corpororo, before me. lic �� C My Commission Expires: ,013,16 4 ness Town Manager Witness Date RFP.r_!'lFD FOR RECORD .._..19 98 AT O m `MORDED !N SOUTH WINDSOR L IAN���,FCO!PIDSVOL PAGE`� WN CLERK 4-SS S �� d- % WARRANTY DEED VOLG To all People to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting: 2369 KNOW YE, THAT RSK-KELLCO, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut having an office and principal place of business in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") for VALUABLE CONSIDERATION GIVEN received to its full satisfaction of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee") does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever with WARRANTY COVENANTS, the following described real property: That certain piece or parcel of land located in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut and being designated as "Heritage Drive" as shown as "Proposed Road" on those certain maps or plans entitled "RSK-Kellco, Inc. Plot Plan Fieldstone Subdivision Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT Scale: 1" = 40' Job No. 96-284A1 Date 08/14/96 Sheet No. 3 of 12 Revision date: 9-6-96 9- 30-96, Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. Consulting Engineers 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, Connecticut" which maps or plans are on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's Office to which reference may be had. Said Heritage Drive is more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK - KELLCO, INC., has hereunto set his hand this&iL day of Math 1999. Signed and Delivered in the presence of(Type or Print name below each signature. ) WITNESSES: GRANTOR: . RSK- LLCO, INC. 0�11t�lz 'uhj- f (a- Ca e e By: Richard S. Kelley, P esident STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ) } ss South Windsor A a V -h 3� , 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) Personally Appeared RICHARD S. KELLEY, President of RSK- KELLCO, INC., as aforesaid, Signer of the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such President and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me. .. C, ry u tc. My;Commission Expires: ro�3�/dd 1J, ; .dil. i;rry Grantee's Address: CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED 1540 Sullivan Avenue �. , �' f 6 STATES �LOCAL S _.._....,,No. South Windsor, CT 06074 TOWN CLERK OF SOUTH WINDSOR J � VOL. 10 7 3 PAGE 207 Schedule A Heritage Drive Beginning at a point on the westerly side of Sullivan Avenue; thence northerly along a curve with a radius of thirty and no one hundredths feet (30.00') a distance of forty-five and ten one hundredths feet (45.10') to a point; thence S 87°57'25" W a distance of eighty-eight and sixteen one hundredths feet (88.16') to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of two hundred fifty-five and no one hundredths feet (255.00") a distance of one hundred thirty-one and forty-six one hundredths feet (131.46') to a point; thence N 62°30'17" W a distance of one hundred twelve and thirty one hundredths feet (112.30') to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of six hundred ten feet and no one hundredths feet (610.00') a distance of one hundred nine and thirty-three one hundredths feet (109.33 ) to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of thirty and no one hundredths feet (30.00') a distance of forty-eight and sixty-eight one hundredths feet (48.68') to a point; thence S 14015'39" W a distance of one hundred ninety-three and fifty-four one hundredths feet (193.54') to a point; thence N 78°34'58" W a distance of fifty and six one hundredths feet (50.06') to a point; thence N 14°15'39" E a distance of one hundred ninety-one and twenty-six one hundredths feet (191.26 ) to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of thirty and no one hundredths feet (30.00') a distance of fifty-one and twenty-eight one hundredths feet (51.28') to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of six hundred ten and no one hundredths feet (610.00') a distance of ninety-three and seventeen one hundredths feet (93.17') to a point; thence S 87°34'54" W a distance of twelve and twenty-nine one hundredths feet (12.29 ) to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of sixty and no one hundredths feet (60.00") a distance of sixty-four and thirty- three one hundredths feet (64.33 ) to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of fifty-five and no one hundredths feet (55.00') a distance of two hundred thirty-one and seventy-five one hundredths feet (231.75') to a point; thence N 87°3454" E a distance of one hundred thirteen and twenty-eight one hundredths feet (113.28 ) to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of six hundred sixty and no one hundredths feet (660.00') a distance of three hundred forty-four and fifty-eight one hundredths feet (344.58 ) to a point; thence S 62°30'17" E a distance of one hundred twelve and thirty one hundredths feet (112.30') to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of two hundred five and no one hundredths feet (205.00') a distance of one hundred five and sixty-nine one hundredths feet (105.69 ) to a point; thence N 87°57'25" E a distance of eighty and seventy-two one hundredths feet (80.72') to a point; thence along a curve with a radius of thirty and no one hundredths feet (30.00') a distance of forty-nine and fifteen one hundredths feet (49.15') to a point; thence S 05°5438" E a distance of one hundred ten and twenty-five one hundredths feet (110.25') to a point and place of beginning. MA ll �,1r �a;� , ��� � ANY � ♦ it isms- e�,! f '®iZ'n�••t oil lift =0 i - i JILI j MIN If All �����1►� ,,�► � e'er s` R